May 9, 2010

The Problem Is The Bubble And That Hasn’t Gone Away

All Things Considered reports on Ireland. “The government has depended heavily on consumption taxes, which are down sharply, as well as taxes on real estate transactions. Because of government policies that encouraged property development and a flood of foreign investment, the country experienced an infamous construction boom. With the bust in the housing market, starting in 2007, property tax revenues slowed sharply, and Dublin began to amass a massive budget deficit. At the same time, the government decided to help prop up some of its bad banks, staggering under the weight of failed real estate deals.”

“Neither has the government altered its pro-development policies, though in this battered real estate market, few people are choosing to take advantage of them. Today, as many as 150,000 empty houses dot the landscape, in a country of about 4 million people, says Fintan O’Toole, a columnist for The Irish Times and the author of Ship of Fools: How Stupidity and Corruption Sank the Celtic Tiger. There are also several hundred ‘zombie hotels,’ erected because tax law favored their construction, he says.”

“Government policies made the problem worse, O’Toole says. It’s a situation he calls ’surreal.”When people used to come to Ireland from abroad in the 1960s and 1970s, one of the sad things you’d see on the landscape was all these empty houses, and they were the sort of physical manifestation of famine in the 19th century, of mass emigration, of the kind of depopulation of whole parts of the countryside,’ O’Toole says.”

“‘So it’s pretty sad to create that out of disasters like famine and emigration,’ he continues. ‘It’s really insane to create it out of a boom. So out of prosperity we managed to create all these empty houses, which have the same ghostly presence on the landscape as the houses from the 19th century had.’”

The Herald on Ireland. “NAMA chairman Frank Daly said that while all developers have sent representatives to meetings with the toxic loans agency, some did not attend these meetings in person. ‘Certainly not all of them have yet abandoned the extravagant mind-set of the 2003-2007 era,’ Mr Daly said.”

“Mr Daly also said one of the more baffling features of the boom was that banks seemed oblivious to other lenders who were financing similar developments in the same area. He also raised big questions about Ireland’s planning process in the past and asked how many shopping centres or apartment developments a medium-sized town could accommodate. The hundreds of unfinished housing estates across the country will never be completed, the NAMA chairman said.”

The Irish Times. “The recession has had a strange impact on interiors, says Isabel Morton. Having lived through an affluent decade in which many became obsessed with property, the nation has become knowledgeable about décor and home furnishings and now demands certain standards. Ironically, despite the number of empty properties littering the countryside, garages, attics, basements and extensions are now being converted, not as luxurious additional living space but as places for extended family members to live in.”

“Couples who have separated but have to stay living under the same roof because they can’t afford to sell their home, are erecting partition walls, installing second kitchens and battling over who gets the main bedroom. And middle-aged parents, whose adult children should have long since flown the nest, are also now housing their children’s partners and their offspring in sometimes very restricted spaces.”

“Interest-only mortgages depended on a rising market and now many in the small-time landlord sector smell trouble, writes Jack Fagan. The interest-only candy pot was also raided by an estimated 10,000 accountants, lawyers and other professionals who spent between €1 million and €2 million each on buying homes with a typical loan-to-value mortgage of 80 per cent. Ominously, the Irish Brokers Association is now warning that, with the value of many of these homes down by 50 per cent, ‘another disaster is waiting to unfold.’”

“Frank Conway of the Irish Mortgage Corporation has voiced concern that the refusal by the banks to extend interest-only facilities could lead to a ‘bloodbath in the small-time landlord sector where many properties were financed through interest-only facilities in the expectation that this market was all about capital appreciation and a relatively quick exit.’”

“Conway cites an example of one investor coming off a five-year interest-only loan facility who has been denied an extension. The borrower’s disappointment is understandable considering that he has been on an incredible deal – an interest-only repayment of only 1.95 per cent. Clearly, the bank has been subsidising the mortgage for at least two years and, with all the banks now looking at ways of bumping up profits, this arrangement – and many more – will inevitably end.”

“The €300,000 mortgage has been costing only €487.50 a month but, with no capital paid down over the past five years, the full loan is still repayable. Even with the borrower on a tracker mortgage rate of 1.95 per cent, the new capital and interest repayments over the remaining 20 years will rise to €1,510 per month – an increase of just over €1,023 a month.”

Business Daily Africa. “The battle for mortgage business is intensifying as cash-flush institutions such as Kenya Commercial Bank and Housing Finance pour cash into more housing development projects. The courtship of developers has reached fever pitch, with previously laid-back institutions now aggressively going out for customers. They are not only forming clubs for developers but also wooing them into more and even bigger housing projects.”

“CFCStanbic is targeting a wider clientele in the metropolitan after realising that the asking prices in areas close to the Central Business District are just too high. Said the bank’s home loans manager, Mr Peter Ondieki recently: ‘Property prices in Nairobi are just too high.’”

“Recently Hass Property Index showed that prices for apartments in Nairobi targeting high-end income earners had tripled in three years due to speculative nature of the market.”

AFP News in China. “China’s recent measures to rein in soaring property prices had been effective in stabilising the real estate market, a top housing official said during a rare online chat with Internet users. Prices in major cities rose 11.7 percent year-on-year in March, the fastest pace since a nationwide survey was widened to 70 cities in July 2005, official data show. At the Beijing Real Estate Expo last month, the average price of a new apartment in the Chinese capital was 21,164 yuan (3,100 dollars) per square metre, double that of last year, state media said.”

“That means a 90-square-metre apartment in Beijing would cost 1.9 million yuan, compared with the average per capita income of 17,175 yuan in 2009.”

“Questions posted on the central government’s website covered a range of issues such as the lack of affordable housing and corruption among officials. One web user with the name ‘Give Me Hope’ complained he and his wife could not afford to buy an apartment in a second-tier city and were jealous of ‘house slaves,’ referring to people with a mortgage.”

“‘We cannot afford the down-payment at all, particularly after the issuance of the new policy requiring a down-payment of at least 30 percent,’ he wrote.”

The China Post. “Europe’s debt crisis will have a “ripple effect” globally and may force China to reverse its tightening policies, JF Asset Management’s Howard Wang said. ‘There could be an economic ripple effect globally if this is not quickly contained,’ said Wang. ‘And as we saw two years ago, there’s a danger in underestimating these ripple effects.’”

“China’s economy slumped to the slowest pace of growth in almost 10 years in the first quarter last year, after a U.S. housing market collapse sparked a credit crunch and sent the world’s largest economy into recession. Chinese growth rebounded after the government implemented a 4 trillion yuan stimulus plan and banks lent an unprecedented 9.6 trillion yuan.”

From The Star in Canada. “Last week, I detailed the economic impact of the residential construction industry in the GTA and mentioned a statement by Gluskin Sheff chief economist and strategist David Rosenberg to the effect that housing was behind Canada’s miraculous economic recovery. This week, I re-read Rosenberg’s economic commentary and took heart in his glowing comments about the contribution of housing to the economy, particularly of late.”

“‘Looking back to last year, it would have been inconceivable to be talking about a Canadian economic miracle, but that is exactly what we have on our hands today; a classic V-shaped recovery. This begs the question as to what has been the principal factor underpinning this impressive Canadian economic revival, especially in relation to what is happening in the United States. We can answer the question in one word: housing,’ Rosenberg wrote.”

“‘Based on our statistical work, around half the seven per cent annualized growth rate in nominal GDP from the recession trough has been due to the combined direct and indirect benefits from the housing boom. And when we apply the price deflators to the various sectors of the GDP, we actual find that every penny of economic activity, in real terms since this recovery began, has occurred thanks to the housing sector’”

“So there you have it — housing and housing alone lifted Canada out of the recession. The question is whether housing can continue to be the driving force in the economy as government stimulus is withdrawn and interest rates start to increase.”

“Meanwhile, out of the blue, the feds took some buyers out of the market by tightening mortgage financing rules for first-time buyers and severely clamping down on condo investors. Regulators might want to take note of Rosenberg’s description of housing as the ‘goose that laid the golden egg.’”

The Vancouver Sun in Canada. “There is a theory — well-oiled and much-flogged — that home ownership in Metro Vancouver is beyond the limit of ordinary working folk. it’s a promulgation fed beyond logic by those who rail about our cost of living, about leaky condos and greedy developers and non-residents driving up prices, about the average cost of a detached house in the region being too close to $1 million.”

“Turns out there are a lot of sweet deals out there. The national Multiple Listing Service site has 382 listings for apartments under $300,000 in Vancouver alone, with hundreds more in surrounding municipalities. But what about a house, you say, one that comes unattached on dirt, one for raising babies and planting perennials, one that doesn’t cost more than, oh, $500,000, which by all accounts is almost reasonable given recent local real estate history.”

“Barring an inheritance or a winning lottery ticket, everyone has budget limitations, and that means sacrifice and compromise. It means getting over the fact that no matter how hard you work, you probably missed the boat on buying an Edwardian pile in Dunbar like the one your grandparents paid $15,000 for 50 years ago. It means you might have to buy what you can afford and not what you want.”

“The property ladder, despite that kvetching grapevine, is not a phantom hope. Here in paradise it just requires some whittling of the wish list. So stop with the despair already. If your grail is to own a little piece of Metro Vancouver paradise, get on with it.”

News 1130 in Canada. “There’s been a huge surge in home sales across the province over the last year. According to a new BMO survey British Columbians are the most confident across the nation to have bought a home because they felt prices would keep rising. Joanne Gassman with the Bank says the sense of urgency to get into the market is due to the upcoming HST. She explains the spike in interest rates and a rebounding economy are the two key reasons people are deciding to sign on the dotted line.”

“‘We’re actually seeing house prices go up as well. In Vancouver, actually house prices are up about 31 per cent compared to what we’ve seen as a national average which is around 18 per cent over last year.’ Gassman adds housing prices have risen 89 per cent since 2002.”

The Windsor Star. “Out-of-town investors with the right approach can compete, said real estate agent Rhys Trenhaile, who has been buying and selling apartment buildings in Windsor for seven years. He and his group have worked with 140 out-of-town investors, including White and his partners. Most are from Western Canada and the Toronto area. Some are ‘fixers and flippers’ but more longer-term investors are moving into the market recently as the vacancy rate is starting to come down, said Trenhaile, who is bullish on the city’s future.”

“‘A lot of these guys are betting Windsor is going to be the next Regina, the next surge city,’ he said.”

The New Zealand Herald. “Confidence in the housing market has weakened as people await details of expected tax changes in the Budget on May 20 and the start to a series of interest rate rises from the Reserve Bank. ASB’s quarterly survey of sentiment in the housing market has recorded a marked drop in the proportion of people expecting house prices to rise over the next 12 months, to a net 35 per cent from 51 per cent three months ago.”

“Looking forward, ASB expects the Budget changes to reduce demand for investment properties and therefore lower activity in the housing market. ‘Beyond the ups and downs of 2010 we expect weak house price growth. A positive for house prices is continued population growth at a time when new construction has not kept pace,’ it said. ‘However, prices do remain quite high compared with incomes and rents.’”

From Scoop in New Zealand. “ASB Economist Chris Tennent-Brown says the drop in confidence reflects the cooling in housing market activity over the last six months. ‘Overall it looks as though the supply of houses is more than keeping pace with the very modest turnover of house sales so far in 2010,’ Mr Tennent-Brown says. ‘Taking these supply and demand dynamics into account, it appears the balance is now tipped slightly in favour of buyers.’”

“‘This compares to the previous quarter, which saw a reduced supply of new listings feeding an increased demand as the market rebounded,’ he says. ‘Beyond 2010, we expect to see some house price growth, but not at the levels house sellers have enjoyed in the past.’”

The Herald Sun. in Australia. “One Victorian property owner is being evicted each day as consumer advocates express fears household repossession will increase as interest rates go up. About 250 properties have been seized in the state while repossession writs filed in the Supreme Court for the same period total 1388. The highest year for Supreme Court repossession writs in the past decade was 2008-09, when more than 3000 writs were issued.”

“The figures indicate that households are facing a similar spike in repossession to that experienced during the last period of high interest rates in 2006-07. Mortgage and debt-related stress are again becoming a major issue for all Australians, a fact recognised during the week by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd after last Tuesday’s interest rate increase. Mr Rudd described the rate rise as ‘a slug for working families.’”

“Richard Foster, CEO of the Financial and Consumer Rights Council, said financial counsellors were now reporting that more than half of their clients were seeking help over issues related to housing affordability. ‘It’s those people who managed to hang on the last time interest rates were high and who had a second bite of the cherry, that refinancing has now fallen in a heap,’ he said.”

The Australia. “Every time the Reserve Bank of Australia raises interest rates, Wayne Swan expresses his deepest sympathy for hard-pressed Australians with mortgages. His concern is touching, to be sure. But it would sound more convincing if he did more to address booming house prices, which is one of the factors feeding into higher rates.”

“Of course, you’ll never catch politicians criticising rising house prices. They would look too much like party poopers, given that higher prices are a cause for celebration for the 68 per cent of Australians who already own houses or are paying them off. Rather, they announce measures that pretend to do something about housing affordability, such as first-home buyers grants that feed directly into higher prices.”

“The Henry tax review thought it was better to get to the root of the problem. Its report says favourable tax and transfer provisions increase overall demand, particularly for owner-occupied housing. That is, exempting the family home from capital gains and land taxes means we tie up too much of the nation’s income in housing compared with more productive areas and we drive up house prices.”

“The report suggests addressing the bias in investment housing towards negatively geared investment, which it describes as ‘a major distortion in the rental property market.’”

“The Australian Taxation Office says losses declared from negatively geared property grew by 35 per cent in 2007-08 to $8.6 billion. The losses, which are the differences between rental income and deductions, mainly interest payments, do not send too many property investors broke, otherwise 1.2 million Australians and rising wouldn’t be plunging so eagerly into negative gearing. Instead, they make a profit from rising property prices with the help of another tax break, the 50 per cent discount on capital gains.”

“If negatively geared investment went mainly into new housing, you could argue that it was helping keep down prices, as well as rents, by adding to supply. Instead, 90 per cent goes into existing houses, meaning it is competing with people buying their own homes. Since the restoration of negative gearing in 1987, there has been an increase from 8 per cent to 40 per cent in the proportion of finance for existing homes that is taken by investors.”

“The Henry review says median house prices have risen from three times to five times average household earnings in the past two decades. Figures collated by Macquarie Bank’s Rory Robertson show house prices rising by 40 per cent in the past five years, compared with a fall of almost 20 per cent in the US. We wouldn’t want to wish the subprime debacle in the US on us but that’s only part of the story. While house prices in Australia have tripled since 1996, in the US they increased by 70 per cent.”

“Considering it is lower-income earners who suffer most from high housing prices and high rents, this does not look much like the actions of a Labor government. As Reserve Bank economist Tony Richards argued last year: ‘As a nation we are not really any richer when the price of housing rises but the more vulnerable tend to be hurt.’”

“Australia is in the midst of an unsustainable housing bubble that could burst at any time, warns the man who predicted the global credit bust of 2007. Edward Chancellor, of US investment management firm GMO, says the Australian economy is yet to emerge from the global financial crisis, despite the widespread belief it has escaped the worst of it ahead of the rest of the world.”

“Mr Chancellor, whose Crunch Time for Credit? was published in 2005, estimates Australian house prices are more than 50 per cent above their fair value - a once in 40-year event. ‘If house prices were to revert to their historic long-term average (ratio of average price to average income) they would fall quite considerably,’ he told The Australian.”

“He described Australia’s banking system as a ‘cartel’ and said luck rather than skill had allowed the Australian economy to fare better in the global financial crisis than other developed economies. He attributed Australia’s ‘luck’ to a comparative lack of competition among local banks, enabling them to avoid much of the reckless lending that occurred in the US, as well as the commodities recovery led by China.”

“‘My view is Australia had a private sector credit boom just like the US and the UK and it had a real estate boom,’ he said. ‘Those are the facts and you can’t paper over them. In this environment, house prices rose last year and that seems to me to actually have exacerbated the problem. The problem is the bubble and that hasn’t gone away.’”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

74 Comments »

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-05-09 06:11:28

That’s what happened here in Long Island city you had to get the foundation built by i think june 2008 in order to qualify for a 15 year real estate tax abatement. So everything was luxury condozes….

And with lower taxes, the how much a month crowd didn’t realize the developers jacked up the price $100K or more to compensate for the lower costs….

———————————————————-
There are also several hundred ‘zombie hotels,’ erected because tax law favored their construction, he says.”

 
Comment by ACH
2010-05-09 06:18:33

This is getting SO tiresome. Here we are at 3 years into the major crisis and nearly five years after the start STILL reading about how “it’s different here.” I still remember how house sales went sour in Florida. The remark by a Florida Realtor reverberates in my mind even now: “It’s like someone flipped a switch!” House sales were never the same. I wanted to sell my house in Tampa and when I walked the neighborhood asking how much everyone was listing for/how long on he market I was reassured that the bottom was indeed falling out. I sold my house in three weeks. I priced it correctly for the market. I looked it up recently and it is worth 2/3 what I got for it.

If and until the poison is “washed out” we will not be able to move on. We need to nationalize these banks/investment houses and take the toxic assets onto the Feds balance sheet. We can then reintroduce these as “healthy” businesses into the market. This will require a true bottom in the house market, the investors taking a real haircut, the bondholders taking their fair share, and the Corporate Executives losing their bonuses and being summarily dismissed.

I have to stop. I’m just killing myself! ROTFLMAO.

Roidy

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-05-09 06:32:05

Canada just blows my mind. While growing up, we visited family around Toronto a lot. It seemed back then (70s) they were acutely aware and sensitive to the state of the U.S. economy. I remember my dad talking at length with his counterparts about plant closings, unemployment, etc. on every visit. Now it seems they’re “all in” on the Great Decoupling.

Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2010-05-09 09:07:18

Canadians certainly can’t claim that they’re running out of land. For all practical purposes, once you get more than 50 miles from the US border, the place is nearly empty. Yes, Edmonton and a few other decent sized cities are beyond that limit, but if you’ve driven through parts of Ontario and Quebec (nos. 1 and 2 in population), you see stretches that appear virtually untouched.

Toronto (Eastern Canada’s bubble central) has no physical barrier to its expansion (except Lake Ontario), so why has it become so expensive? I don’t know whether Vancouver is geographically hemmed in (perhaps it sits in a valley?) but BC on the whole appears to have a lot of space, so why a bubble there?

Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 09:18:00

When I was growing up I thought the Rockies went north/south across the middle of north America. Now I realize the Rockies go on a diagonal starting in El Paso TX and ending up on the Pacific coast in BC. There’s only a limited shelf of land near Vancouver BC between the mountains and the sea.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-05-09 09:28:54

I drove down that side of BC years ago. It is a nice part of the world, but wasn’t that always the case? Check out the familiar characterization of urban ‘pioneers’:

‘Project name: Avant, 2901 Wall St., Vancouver, Residence size: 1,065-1,894 sq. ft. Prices: $480,900-$871,900′

‘If necessity truly is the mother of invention, then we can thank Vancouver’s shrinking supply of developable land for inspiring planners to unearth innovative pockets of paradise we didn’t know we had. A case in point is the forthcoming esplanade waterfront development at the base of Renfrew Street in East Vancouver. Renfrew waterfront, you say? Believe it.’

‘All residents have private decks or patios and access to a residential fitness facility in a prime spot near the water. The rooftop decks have sexy gas fireplaces, as well. A full-height reclaimed feature wall of recycled brick from vintage Vancouver buildings says ‘warehouse chic.’

‘In the case of this development’s forward thinking began with the name and tag line: Avant “Lead the way”, chosen mostly because of the surprise factor of the neighbourhood — to make a proposition that offers typical city-dwellers or suburbanites something a little unexpected in terms of lifestyle and location.’

‘We felt that in order for someone to come in to Avant, they had to have the spirit of a pioneer because there has not been much development in this area,’ says Wan. ‘It’s new and it dares them to be a little bit different, if they’re ready to pave the way.’

‘Turns out, he needn’t have questioned the proposition one bit. One week after opening, 35 out of 48 units have sold. Response is brisk and enthusiastic, says Wan, with the undiscovered gem now officially out of the bag.’

http://www.vancouversun.com/business/real-estate/Eager+buyers+grab+East+Vancouver+waterfront/2973972/story.html

 
Comment by snake charmer
2010-05-09 18:57:34

Is that building in the heroin-addict skid row near the Chinese Garden? During my visit to Canada eight years ago, that particular area, known as the Downtown Eastside, was described as the worst neighborhood in the entire country. I walked to the Garden from my hotel near Robson Street and things went downhill in a hurry.

Take it from a Floridian, here’s a classic sign of a bubble about to burst: the use of the word “paradise” in a real estate sales pitch. And my God, people talking about speculating in Windsor, a city which on the plus side produced Bob Probert but otherwise is tied too closely to the automobile manufacturing industry.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 09:41:05

A picture is worth 1,000 words: behold Vancouver BC.

http://z.about.com/d/govancouver/1/0/F/0/-/-/GrouseMountain.jpg

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-05-09 10:03:56

Yeah, so what? Prices crashed in Tokyo after that bubble:

http://www.fgautron.com/gallery/tokyophotosandco/rhillsfeb007

 
Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 10:13:43

My post was in response to irishhoosiers’ wondering whether buildable land near Vancouver was limited by geography.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-05-09 11:06:25

‘I don’t know whether Vancouver is geographically hemmed in (perhaps it sits in a valley?) but BC on the whole appears to have a lot of space, so why a bubble there?’

The question of a RE bubble doesn’t have much to do with land limitations. I’m sure places like Tokyo/Vancouver have high wages and little land, but they are still subject to natural limits of what things can be worth. During a mania, these limits are disregarded in the pursuit of ‘getting in.’ (As we’ve discussed at length, there is also a fear of ‘missing out’ that draws in the last greater fools).

Let’s look at irrational behavior in Vancouver; crowds lining up to borrow silly amounts to buy small, preconstruction condos. This is a well documented bubble sign, and a late-in-the-game one at that. As for the basics; is it cheaper to rent? What are the income to purchase price ratios? What is the level of speculation and speculative building? Take all this together, and Vancouver appears to be one of the most overpriced, and yes, overbuilt, cities on the planet.

 
Comment by NYCResident
2010-05-09 11:45:44

Is it wrong to pay a larger premium to live in an efficient condo in dynamic places like Vancouver or Manhattan or Sydney? I cannot say I understand why prices remain elevated in these cities, but I do know that you can save a lot of money annually by living a car free existence.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-05-09 12:25:25

Premium to rents is not a good sign. There is disagreement on this issue, but IMO, rents should be higher than owning. This is the trade off for immobility, maintenance and taxes. Plus, if this wasn’t so, why would anyone want to be a landlord?

Econ 101 shows that any time prices get above equilibrium, supply will rise and eventually drive prices down. With housing this takes the form of overbuilding. And during a prolonged period of high prices, the market mix is distorted, like condos. So what we’ve see in many urban markets, like NYC, is massive overbuilding of condos.

Some cities lend themselves to a true “urban living” situation. And I’ve learned over the years that each bubble market has a bit of truth to the mania built around it; high wages in Boston, NYC, LA, London. Sunshine in Florida, mild weather on the coast of California. Population growth in Las Vegas or Phoenix. But to determine if there is a bubble, I prefer to weight the factors I mentioned above. And if you’ve got a bubble, it’s gonna go down, no matter where it is.

 
Comment by scdave
2010-05-09 13:39:29

Your first paragraph does provoke some thought Ben…The reason “in the past” was that by being a landlord you were rewarded with appreciation or, what ever you want to call it…Today, not so…Going forward likely not so for as far out as one can see…I like your supposition that “rents should be higher than owning”…Like I said, thought provoking…

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 15:40:29

“Plus, if this wasn’t so, why would anyone want to be a landlord?”

Inflation hedge?

With the massive piles of debt weighing down the global economy at so many levels, the motive for central banks to create ‘higher than expected’ inflation which ‘nobody could have seen coming’ is clear; whether they can manage to do so remains to be seen.

 
Comment by NYCResident
2010-05-09 18:05:44

Interesting ideas, Ben. When rents are a premium to owning, there is an incentive to buy. It is frustrating that cap rates to buy in Manhattan are as low as 3-3.5%, which is less than the interest rate on a mortgage, but more than income from a bank CD. Maybe that explains why a lot of recent transactions are all cash. To get to equilibrium, either prices need to fall or go sideways for a very long time or rents need to rise. I agree that there will be dramatic adjustments, but it is not clear how or when. I was lucky to buy 12 years ago when rents were a premium to ownership costs. Selling may be a very prudent move, but there are high transaction costs to trade and no guarantees.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-10 09:33:22

And rents can’t rise because salaries are not rising… yet we’re supposed to believe “housing only goes up!”

 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 09:13:37

One article above references a new “HST”. I looked it up and it’s a new “harmonized sales tax” in BC.

They charge SALES TAX on the sale of a house! New rules go into effect 1 July 2010 so there’s a push on up north to buy/sell now.

Listen up California! Charge sales tax (presently about 9%) on the sales of homes! You budget problems would all go away. ;)

Comment by Groundhogday
2010-05-09 14:21:49

Washington state charges a “transfer” tax on the sale of real estate, roughly 2.5-3% depending upon how much your county and local government tack on. Roughly 35 states charge such a tax.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Dave of the North
2010-05-10 02:52:36

I don’t know what the rules are in BC, but in New Brunswick we have GST (the federal part of HST) only on new house sales. Used houses are exempt. We also have a GST rebate supposed to be given back to the purchaser, but every builder puts in the contract that it be given to the builder.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-10 09:27:47

The mindset won’t change, IMHO.

People need to believe The Lie or they will have to face the sad reality that they’ll never be able to get rich quick and that being frugal and cautious is the only path to any real wealth vs. spinning the wheel and betting it all on housing (or whatever the same of the year is.)

Here in Maryland, the Bubble still rolls on, though at a lower size than before. But everyone still believes real estate “only goes up!” even though it doesn’t.

 
 
Comment by Boise Idaho
2010-05-09 06:27:34

I was researching the Boise Market this week and it looks like they over built, again? not sure if the demand is there or if builders are overly optimistic. Boise Definitely has had a solid spring run. It is driven by in-migration, Californians of course.

Comment by arizonadude
2010-05-09 09:25:52

They aint making any more land.Didnt idaho get invaded by californians with equity money?

Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 09:35:02

I invaded Idaho but not with “equity” money. Rather I SOLD my San Jose house and bought in Boise.

The Realtor above probably is referring to the numerous “stalled” projects around Boise that are only now being completed: “Napoli” in Meridian, “Pepperwood” townhouses in Boise, etc. The original developers of these subs went belly-up and only recently have new developers shown up with the funding to complete the subs.

Comment by eudemon
2010-05-09 10:20:47

Same difference.

Make your bundle in California, sell big, then screw up real estate values elsewhere.

After you do that, question why others at age 59 still have a mortgage. Or age 56. Or age 53.

Typical mindset of people in their 60s and 70s. Make a boatload of money in your 40s due largely to demographics (i.e., “luck”), then complain about younger generations who can’t afford to buy what you’re trying to sell.

Enjoy your paid-for retirement.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-10 09:35:44

Yep, we have plenty of those types round here at work. They love to trumpet how high housing prices are vital to economic health - and Maryland still has very high prices so that is a “good thing” - but when I ask them if they could afford to buy their own house at today’s price, they say that they couldn’t. Well, then how are younger people with less money supposed to afford it?! Argh!

 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 10:26:23

azdude,

From my point of view, Idaho didn’t get invaded by Californians who sold their homes in CA and moved here.

Rather, many Californians HELOCed their CA houses to speculate on houses here, often buying multiple places with minimal down.

There are only so many people in Boise, and most of them already had a place. Similarly, people moving to Boise from out of state could generally afford buy a place. Hence the house rental market was very soft here even during the bubble.

The soft rental market was a drag on the out-of-state speculators during the bubble. Many of these speculative purchases remained empty for years. Then when the bubble burst they just all went into default.

The actual local people are now more able to buy nice new houses at greatly reduced prices.

 
 
Comment by Bad Chile
2010-05-09 10:52:59

My favorite spammer is back!

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2010-05-09 06:31:07

The entire world is in a property bubble. Everyone wanted something for nothing and the banks were happy to help. The governments LOVED the increased taxes and spent like there was no tomorrow.

Well, tomorrow is here.

My experiences in eastern europe are the same. Take for example Slovakia - Average wage is $500-700 and the average apartment (let alone a house) is $300,000. Even worse math in the baltics and the ukraine.

The whole world needs to deflate. Many will default.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-09 06:57:06

It’s a Small Bubbly World after all ….

Maybe we could sell the concept to DIsney as a update for the ride that everyone seems to hate. They could rip out al the world landmarks from the ride and just replace them all with high rise condoze with ‘for sale’ signs.

 
Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2010-05-09 09:14:00

Doesn’t Slovakia in essense have a bifurcated market, i.e., one for foreigners who want the latest & greatest in granite and stainless steel, and another for the locals (I’m thinking the communist monstrosity apartments in Petrzalka)? I can’t believe those Brezhnev era POS apartments could ever sell for more than $20,000 USD.

Haven’t been there since ‘95, so maybe the place has turned into yet another out of control bubble.

 
Comment by snake charmer
2010-05-09 19:00:12

I don’t always agree with you 2banana but that was a good post.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-09 06:47:56

Great cornucopia of “evidence” Mr. Ben, tankxs…I feel like I just hopped, skipped, and slid around the “spinning planet” this morning! :-)

“That means a 90-square-metre apartment in Beijing would cost 1.9 million yuan, compared with the average per capita income of 17,175 yuan in 2009.”

China = “TrueBambooLie™” ;-)

BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! (fpss™)

Comment by scdave
2010-05-09 08:31:23

“That means a 90-square-metre apartment in Beijing would cost 1.9 million yuan ??

So lets do the conversion here…A Meter is 39.3 inches so this apartment is over 8,000 sq.ft. ??

Comment by combotechie
2010-05-09 08:46:17

One square meter equals 10.76 square feet.

10.76 square feet times 90 equals 954 square feet.

 
Comment by scdave
2010-05-09 08:52:35

oops…Need more coffee…

 
Comment by GH
2010-05-09 10:01:03

Whats a decimal point amongst friends :-)

I noted the decimal point is still in the wrong place when it comes to price though, but of course it would not be a bubble would it?

 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2010-05-09 06:49:57

“Mr. Daly also said one of the more baffling features of the boom was that banks seemed oblivious to other lenders who were financing similar developments in the same area.”

Nothing baffling here; this is Groupthink at work.

The boom fed on itself because the members of the groupthinkers, the bankers in this case, excluded from their presence anyone who disagreed with the consensus of the groupthinkers. Conform or get lost.

Eventually all that was left were conformists who viewed the world in a way that was divorced from reality.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-09 06:53:44

Anyone who disagreed was “not a team player”.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 06:55:59

“Government policies made the problem worse, O’Toole says. It’s a situation he calls ’surreal.”When people used to come to Ireland from abroad in the 1960s and 1970s, one of the sad things you’d see on the landscape was all these empty houses, and they were the sort of physical manifestation of famine in the 19th century, of mass emigration, of the kind of depopulation of whole parts of the countryside,’ O’Toole says.”

Why does that sound vaguely familiar? Oh yeah…

No one home: 1 in 9 housing units vacant
Updated 2/13/2009 3:00 PM

Two houses with discontinued construction surround an empty lot, next to a finished home, in Miami on Jan. 22.
Enlarge image Enlarge By Joe Raedle, Getty Images

By Haya El Nasser and Paul Overberg, USA TODAY

A record 1 in 9 U.S. homes are vacant, a glut created by the housing boom and subsequent collapse.

“The numbers are further documentation of the gravity of the housing problem,” says Nicolas Retsinas, head of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies. “This inventory is delaying any kind of housing recovery.”

The surge in empty houses, condominiums and apartments is creating a wave of problems for communities desperate to shore up property values and tax revenues that pay for services. Vacant homes create upkeep and safety problems that ripple through neighborhoods.

“It has a contagion effect,” Retsinas says. “A house that is vacant is often a house that is less well kept up.”

A construction frenzy began pushing the vacancy rate up in 2005 but empty homes sold quickly at that time.

“This is a different problem,” says Dowell Myers, housing demographer at the University of Southern California. “It’s high now because of lack of demand. Now, vacancies we see are from units that have been empty for a period of time.”

Census numbers show:

• More than 14 million housing units are vacant. That number does not include an estimated 4.8 million seasonal or vacation homes, most of which are occupied part of the year. The combined vacancy rate of almost 15% is higher than during previous recessions: 11% in 1991 and 9.4% in 1984.

• About 3% of owned homes are vacant. In normal times, “maybe 1% should be vacant,” Myers says.

• More than 9% of homes built since 2000 are vacant compared with about 2% for older homes.

• Homes priced at $500,000 or more are just as likely to be empty as homes that cost less than $100,000.

I apologize this article is over a year out of date. I am sure with the Green Shoots of recovery we just had, the U.S. housing vacancy problem is 100 percent solved by now.

Here is some data that accompanied the article I posted, for which I again apologize regarding its datedness:

UNOCCUPIED

Fourth-quarter 2008 vacancy rates for all types of housing:

Rental

2000: 7.8%
2001: 8.8%
2002: 9.4%
2003: 10.2%
2004: 10.0%
2005: 9.6%
2006: 9.8%
2007: 9.6%
2008: 10.1%

Homeowner

2000: 1.6%
2001: 1.8%
2002: 1.7%
2003: 1.8%
2004: 1.8%
2005: 2.0%
2006: 2.7%
2007: 2.8%
2008: 2.9%

Note: Does not include vacation homes
Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 07:30:43

Empty feeling: 28% of Orlando-area housing units vacant

But housing pain is renters’ gain as apartments dangle enticements
January 21, 2010|By Mary Shanklin, Orlando Sentinel

Orlando had more vacant houses, condos and apartments than any other major U.S. city during the third quarter, driving down rents and sparking landlord concessions just five years after finding an apartment was virtually impossible.

The four-county metro area had a vacancy rate of 28 percent for all housing in the late summer months of 2009, according to the newest U.S. census information. Orlando’s vacancies surpassed those of any of the other top 75 metropolitan areas in the country.

The information, drawn from a sampling with a 7 percent margin of error, is yet another indicator of the magnitude of the housing slump in this market. The Orando area has the nation’s 11th-highest foreclosure rate and what may be the country’s largest drop in condo prices.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-09 07:40:01

While Uncle Sam pisses away the nation’s collective wealth on keeping housing prices unsustainably supported at unaffordable levels, vacant homes across the landscape are piling up and crumbling into desuetude. Keep up the good work, boyz!

BTW, one of my sons and I participated in a service project yesterday to help clean up trash along an area river. We spent most of the time working under a freeway overpass that was littered with refuse and cigarette butts. Two homeless guys watched us as we worked from the area where they had set up a makeshift household. I thought to myself, how sad that our nation’s housing policy has produced the absurd situation where people live under bridges while 19 million housing units sit vacant, all in the name of ‘affordable housing.’ Who are the architects of this policy disaster, and what can the American people possibly do to thank them?

market pulse

April 26, 2010, 10:41 a.m. EDT
U.S. vacant housing hits record 19 million
By Rex Nutting

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The number of vacant housing units in the United States increased to a record 19 million in the first quarter of the year, up from 18.9 million in the fourth quarter, the Commerce Department reported Monday. About 14.5% of homes were vacant, with 4.4 million available to be rented and 2 million available to be sold. The vacancy rate for rentable units fell to 10.6% from 10.7% in the fourth quarter. The vacancy rate for homes ready to be sold was steady at 2.7%. In the past year, the housing inventory rose by 1.14 million to 130.9 million, while occupied homes increased by 1.07 million to 111.9 million.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-09 07:47:39

If the MarketWatchers’ assertion statement that “about 14.5% of homes were vacant” as of Q4 2009 is correct, then we can update* the USA Today story line to read, “A record 1 in 9 7 U.S. homes are vacant, a glut created by the housing boom and subsequent collapse.”

* According to Google, 100/14.5 = 6.89655172.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 07:54:02

Maybe if Ben Bernanke reread Ch 1 in one of those introductory economics text books that he publishes, he could figure out the connection between the Fed’s housing price support (MBS purchase) program and the record glut of vacant homes that dot the U.S. landscape.

Comment by combotechie
2010-05-09 08:08:59

Ch 1 of those introductory economic books also suggests that if bank’s collateral disappears then the bank will soon follow.

Bottom line: Supporting house prices supports bank’s collateral. It’s all about saving the banks, IMO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2010-05-09 08:43:37

Yep…The policy save the banks and not just for us but world wide…

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 08:48:17

I know it is different here in the U.S., but the Japanese experience suggests that collateral can keep declining in value for decades following a bubble without an outright collapse of the banking system.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 08:50:37

The unsettled part of the debate appears to be whether it is better to just get the collapse over and done with, and quickly start rebuilding out of the rubble, or to drag out the crash for years or even decades (Japan again) and live with endless economic malaise. The current generation of U.S. dismal scientists in top policy circles appears to have concluded that a slow, painful death is preferable to a quick and painless one.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-09 09:42:19

Slow death saves the banks, nobody else gets a vote?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-05-09 11:41:22

The current generation of U.S. dismal scientists in top policy circles appears to have concluded that a slow, painful death is preferable to a quick and painless one.

Can you guarantee it will be quick and painless? How?

Is there an example in history of a developed country having a major economic crash, and by letting the ‘chips fall where they may’, promptly and painlessly entering into a sustainable economic recovery? (By which I mean not just entering into a new bubble.)

These aren’t rhetorical questions, I truly want to know. I can’t think of an example of it occurring, but it seems to be self-evident to some. I’m curious how they’re so sure.

 
Comment by polly
2010-05-09 15:44:14

I doubt that an example can be found no matter what definition is used, but the first thing you have to do is define “painless.”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 15:44:23

“These aren’t rhetorical questions, I truly want to know.”

Good luck at finding an example of an economic crisis where the government truly let the free market correct the situation; I am also curious if anyone thinks they have an example.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-09 16:23:50

I’ve heard of a crash that occurred early in the 1920s used as an example, but I’ve never studied it enough to know anything about it.

 
 
 
Comment by Lola
2010-05-09 09:05:58

“The number of vacant housing units in the United States increased to a record 19 million in the first quarter of the year, up from 18.9 million in the fourth quarter, the Commerce Department reported Monday. About 14.5% of homes were vacant, with 4.4 million available to be rented and 2 million available to be sold.”

4.4 million + 2 million = 6.4 million
19 million - 6.4 million = 12.6 million housing units that are … where?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 09:09:04

“12.6 million housing units that are … where?”

Shadow inventory, perhaps?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 08:57:51

Fair Game
Ignoring the Elephant in the Bailout
By GRETCHEN MORGENSON
Published: May 7, 2010

IF you blinked, you might have missed the ugly first-quarter report last week from Freddie Mac, the mortgage finance giant that, along with its sister Fannie Mae, soldiers on as one of the financial world’s biggest wards of the state.

Freddie — already propped up with $52 billion in taxpayer funds used to rescue the company from its own mistakes — recorded a loss of $6.7 billion and said it would require an additional $10.6 billion from taxpayers to shore up its financial position.

The news caused nary a ripple in the placid Washington scene. Perhaps that’s because many lawmakers, especially those who once assured us that Fannie and Freddie would never cost taxpayers a dime, hope that their constituents don’t notice the burgeoning money pit these mortgage monsters represent. Some $130 billion in federal money had already been larded on both companies before Freddie’s latest request.

But taxpayers should examine Freddie’s first-quarter numbers not only because the losses are our responsibility. Since they also include details on Freddie’s delinquent mortgages, the company’s sales of foreclosed properties and losses on those sales, the results provide a telling snapshot of the current state of the housing market.

That picture isn’t pretty. Serious delinquencies in Freddie’s single-family conventional loan portfolio — those more than 90 days late — came in at 4.13 percent, up from 2.41 percent for the period a year earlier. Delinquencies in the company’s Alt-A book, one step up from subprime loans, totaled 12.84 percent, while delinquencies on interest-only mortgages were 18.5 percent. Delinquencies on its small portfolio of option-adjustable rate loans totaled 19.8 percent.

The company’s inventory of foreclosed properties rose from 29,145 units at the end of March 2009 to almost 54,000 units this year. Perhaps most troubling, Freddie’s nonperforming assets almost doubled, rising to $115 billion from $62 billion.

When Freddie sells properties, either before or after foreclosure, it generates losses of 39 percent, on average.

There is a bright spot: new delinquencies were fewer in number than in the quarter ended Dec. 31.

Freddie Mac said the main reason for its disastrous quarter was an accounting change that required it to bring back onto its books $1.5 trillion in assets and liabilities that it had been keeping off of its balance sheet.

NONE of the grim numbers at Freddie are surprising, really, given that it and Fannie have pretty much been the only games in town of late for anyone interested in getting a mortgage. The problem for taxpayers, of course, is that the company’s future doesn’t look much different from its recent past.

Comment by Paul Johnson
2010-05-09 14:33:18

I will bet that these numbers for Fannie and Freddie are not any worse than for privately-held investment companies, which are not required to release this kind of information. The claim that “Freddie and Fannie have been the only games in town of late” may be true for 2008 through 2010, but completely untrue for the period in which the loans were made that are now in default. Republicans need to curb their enthusiasm with some comparative facts.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-09 15:46:17

I think the main issue many are raising now days is that F&F recently seem to be ignoring Rule Number 1 for extricating one’s self from a hole:

STOP DIGGING!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-10 09:42:30

We can always print more money, so there’s no problem!?

 
 
 
Comment by Man from Long Island
2010-05-09 09:04:56

My ususal rant / frustration… Just curious what people think about the current state of the market in New York area. I bought in 321 w. 90th Street (nice coop with no doorman, 1 bedroom “natural” apartments) in 1998 for 150k… sold in 2001 for 365k… recently seeing ads for 630k for approx a 750 square foot apartment…
Just google 321 West 90th Street #7D and you can see for yourself. Beautiful pre-war, non-doorman coop, but almost 650k? Where is the bubble popped? I want to move up from where I am now on Long Island for last nine years but prices on nicer parts of Long Island (north shore) are similarly sticky/resistant. I wish interest rates WOULD go to 15%… prices still insane in nicer areas. South Shore where I moved to has seen significant easing in prices but still inflation-adjusted well above 1998 levels. My house is not that much more than I paid in 2001 (after inflation…) but is still way above 1998 levels. On other hand, Port Washington, other areas in northwest Nassau county (nicer areas) have not dropped commensurately. Very frustrating. Only on the island because of my wife’s family being here, but would love to move from South Shore (airplane-noise-land) while keeping a reasonable commute into the city.

Comment by scdave
2010-05-09 10:07:38

Where is the bubble popped ??

What we have now is a broad range of falling prices from the worst (Florida,Az,NV & CA) to the least in some urban cores…Jobs and more likely historical low mortgage rates are the support…Government revenue enhancement is coming from all directions and a real estate is the perfect “Captive” target…

Transfer taxes, curtailment of the mortgage interest deduction, elimination of the Fed property tax deduction, and in particular, higher interest rates and other revenue generators will all work against high housing costs…

 
Comment by bink
2010-05-09 10:22:13

Why not rent? If it’s anything like the non-deflated areas of DC, rent will be much cheaper than a mortgage.

Comment by scdave
2010-05-09 10:49:16

rent will be much cheaper than a mortgage ??

A mortgage at historical lows I might add…

Through the years, the mortgages that I had ranged from the low’s of mid 8% to the highs of 13%…We have mortgages @ 5% right now…
Even lower under some circumstances…What happens if by market forces, interest go back up to 8% + ??

What happens to housing prices with the combination of higher taxes & fee’s, with persistent un & underemployment and a curtailment of real estate related deductions ??

I believe the headwinds are so strong and from so many directions that you cannot make a plausible case for prices to not continue to fall…

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2010-05-09 13:00:52

The NYC area has not dropped that much in real estate prices. All the TARP and stimulus money basically went to Wall Street insane bonuses/salaries and they kept right along spending in the metro NYC region. They also have been hiring recently.

It can’t last. Taxes are going way up, regular jobs are leaving NYC (manufacturing, service, etc.). Bloomberg is going to lay-off 11,000 people. NYS will lay-off massive amounts of people also.

The wall of cards is coming down. Especially if more fiscally conservative politicians get elected in NOV.

Patience…Stalingrad will fall. The pincers have almost encircled it. Next comes block by block fighting until mid-town apartments go for $150,000 (but you may not want to live there then).

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-09 14:11:19

I don’t want to be the Germans at Stalingrad.

Comment by DennisN
2010-05-09 14:35:01

The Russians lost maybe 2 million killed in retaking Stalingrad, although the German 6th Army was wiped out almost to a man.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-09 14:41:10

Yeah, I hope the HBBer fate is better than that.

 
 
 
 
Comment by NYCResident
2010-05-09 18:43:10

Man from Long Island, I have lived in your old neighborhood for 27 years. I’m originally from the midwest, but came to NYC to work on Wall Street, which I left 15 years ago. I must say that the neighborhood and all of NYC is a lot nicer to live in than it was 27 years ago. Unfortunately, the high cost of renting today is about 2 or 2.5 times what it was in the early eighties. The cost of ownership has risen by about 3 times.

 
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2010-05-09 12:21:47

Outstanding collection of articles Ben. This madness is truly worldwide. The beat goes on…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-09 20:15:56

At a price tag of €750 bn ($964 bn), the Eurozone Shock and Awe bailout is bigger than the TARP was. As I recall, the U.S. stock market went to hell in a hand basket over the six months following the TARP. I guess lightning never strikes twice, though?

The Wall Street Journal
EU Agrees to €750 Billion Bailout Plan

The EU agreed an audacious €750 billion bailout plan in an effort to stanch a burgeoning sovereign debt crisis that began in Greece but now threatens the stability of financial markets world-wide.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-09 20:21:05

So far as I am aware, brake is a car part, while break is the present tense of broke, which is what you are likely to soon be if you buy real estate in the near future. We are about to break through the Eurozone bailout looking glass; hold on tight to your seat during the ride!

Real-Estate Pain to Continue
* THE OUTLOOK
* MAY 10, 2010

Real Estate’s Far Reach to Continue to Pinch

As the economy struggles to regain its strength, real estate is expected to continue to act as a break, rather than an accelerator.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-10 09:44:46

Well, real estate will break the world’s economy, so that’s sort of correct…

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-09 20:22:51

So far as I am aware, brake is a car part, while break is the present tense of broke, which is what you are likely to soon be if you buy real estate in the near future. We are about to break through the Eurozone bailout looking glass; hold on tightly to your seat during the ride!

Real-Estate Pain to Continue
* THE OUTLOOK
* MAY 10, 2010

Real Estate’s Far Reach to Continue to Pinch

As the economy struggles to regain its strength, real estate is expected to continue to act as a break, rather than an accelerator.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-09 20:30:04

The leading story below is indeed sad, but for Chrissakes, the HAMP cannot possibly double as a health insurance plan of last resort, can it?

When Mortgage Relief Is a Band-Aid

* The Wall Street Journal
* BUSINESS
* MAY 8, 2010

Mortgage Paid, but a Dozen Debts to Go
Home-Loan Aid Brings Little Relief To Those With Other Big Bills Waiting

By JAMES R. HAGERTY And RUTH SIMON

After months of negotiations, Wells Fargo & Co. agreed in February to reduce Cynthia Mason’s mortgage payments by about $300 a month.

But the 49-year-old resident of Volente, Texas, a former school secretary who is unemployed and battling cancer, says her income still falls short of what she needs for medical and legal bills, health insurance, credit cards, a car loan—and the mortgage.

“I think the whole process is a sham,” Ms. Mason said, angry that the San Francisco bank didn’t do more to help reduce her debt load. A Wells Fargo spokeswoman declined to comment on her situation.

As the Obama administration prods banks to rev up mortgage modifications for millions of households, an obstacle is emerging: Many people’s debt woes go far deeper than home loans. Rewriting their mortgages is little more than a bandage on a gaping financial wound.

Mike Thompson, director of the Iowa Mediation Service, which counsels borrowers facing foreclosure, said 25% to 30% of borrowers who got mortgage modifications last year are now coming back for more help because they are struggling with their remaining debt payments.

Debt counselors say some borrowers got into trouble because of overspending, while others are wallowing in debt because of such things as illness, divorce or unemployment.

At Citigroup Inc., borrowers who had mortgages restructured but are again falling behind on payments “have a much higher [overall debt burden] than those who don’t,” said Sanjiv Das, president of the New York bank’s mortgage unit.

The slippage is the latest sign of trouble for the Obama administration’s foreclosure-prevention program, which has been widely criticized for its slow pace since being launched in February 2009. Through March, roughly 228,000 borrowers had been granted reduced payments for the next five years, and an additional 781,000 were in “trials” to qualify for such relief. The Treasury Department’s target is to help as many as four million borrowers by the end of 2012.

The Home Affordable Modification Program provides financial incentives for mortgage companies and investors to reduce mortgage-related payments, including taxes and insurance, to 31% of pretax income. The program doesn’t mandate that total debt payments be cut to a certain level, though it does prescribe financial counseling for borrowers whose debt ratios are 55% or more.

Among households that have received a mortgage modification, the median ratio of total debt to pretax income was 61% as of March 31, according to the Treasury Department. That level “is ridiculously high,” said Chris Krehmeyer, chief executive of Beyond Housing, a nonprofit counseling group in St. Louis. At ratios higher than about 50%, “if you have one bump in the road, the apple cart can turn upside down,” he said.

A Treasury spokeswoman said HAMP and other loan-modification programs weren’t intended to save all homeowners from foreclosure or bankruptcy. The U.S. government has taken several steps that address the need for “comprehensive affordability,” she added, including new incentives for banks and other holders of junior-lien loans to cut payments on the loans when the first mortgage is eased.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post