May 11, 2010

Bits Bucket For May 12, 2010

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. The DC meetup link at the forum is here. Click here for the shadow inventory thread.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

276 Comments »

Comment by drumminj
2010-05-11 23:43:05

Ooh, I’m finally early on the BB. Woohoo!

I haven’t been reading too much lately, so I wanted to solicit comments on the Joshua Tree Extension in case I missed any comments/complaints. I’m working on a few minor tweaks based on shortcomings I see while using it….certainly happy to hear what others have to say.

Feel free to email me directly via address on web page rather than cluttering up the forum here.

Comment by seen it all
2010-05-12 09:43:52

always worked great for me.
what kind of glitches should i be on the look out for?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-05-12 10:07:38

Thank you, drum, for helping me when I had to upgrade to Firefox 3. The JT Extension’s working like a charm now.

 
Comment by drumminj
2010-05-12 11:19:02

what kind of glitches should i be on the look out for?

No glitches to look out for….I’ve not gotten many bugs reported, nor run into any on my own usage. I’m wanting to make it more helpful/easier to use, and have a few ideas. Am open to others if anyone wants to comment.

People sometimes ask questions/complain/etc in here, and since I haven’t been reading, I haven’t seen them. Just want to be sure I’ve not missed anything.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-05-12 11:41:02

drumminj,

When I click a link, and then hit the return button to come back to the HBB, The “Next” resets to “Next (0) and all the posts I haven’t read are assumed read and gone. So I just cut and paste the links most times.

But it’s really great Thank you!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:50:13

Best way to get around that is to open any links by right-clicking and selecting “Open Link in New Window” (or new tab).

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-05-12 12:56:56

Best way to get around that is to open any links by right-clicking and selecting “Open Link in New Window” (or new tab).

I never thought of right click as I have a mac. But the mac right-click workaround (control-click) works. Thanks!

 
Comment by drumminj
2010-05-12 13:17:37

Best way to get around that is to open any links by right-clicking and selecting “Open Link in New Window” (or new tab).

I could also intercept link clicks and force them to a new window…perhaps I’ll do that (or modify all the anchors).

Hrm…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 03:05:14

Bernanke Admits Printing $1.3 Trillion Out Of Thin Air
by Greg Hunter21 April 2010 USAWAtchDog Website

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke admitted the central bank created $1.3 trillion out of thin air to buy mortgage backed securities. This shocking admission came from the Joint Economic Committee hearing on Capital Hill last week.

I was dumbfounded when I saw Bernanke shake his head in the affirmative as Representative Ron Paul said,
“Well, where did you get the money? You created this money. So you did monetize debt, and that went into the banking system.”
I was amazed he admitted this. I looked up the original hearing on C-Span to make sure the clip was not edited. It was not.

What is even more shocking is I could not find a single mainstream news agency that covered this revelation. Congress just finished voting on the bitterly contested Obama health care bill that is supposed to cost nearly a trillion dollars over ten years. (Some contend it will be more than twice that amount.)

The mainstream media doesn’t even bat an eye over the Fed creating $1.3 trillion in a little more than a year to buy worthless debt no one else will touch. I do not get it. I guess we could have asked the Fed to print up a trillion dollars to pay for health care and avoided that drawn out battle in Congress.

Then, Rep. Paul brings up printing another $105 billion to bailout Greece.

Bernanke answers by saying,
“…I think one of the agreements that the G20 leaders came up with was sort of a mutual commitment to put more money into the IMF as a way of addressing the financial crisis around the world…”
Notice how Bernanke used the term “mutual commitment.”

I think what that really means is an agreement between all the G-20 nations of a “mutual debasement of their currencies.” I think this is why gold has been rising in price around the globe. I have been saying for months that we are going to have some very big inflation. (Real inflation is already at 9.5% according to shadowstats.com.)

I wrote about this last November in a post called “The Fix Is In.”

I think Bernanke just opened the Fed playbook and revealed money will be printed to fix all financial problems. I don’t think he’s even trying to hide it anymore. Rep. Paul also brought up the big debt trouble coming soon with many, many bankrupt cities and states such as Los Angeles and California. I think they will all be bailed out one way or another by the printing press.

New York Fed President William Dudley seems to be on the same page as his boss. Dudley recently said,
“The fact that our foreign indebtedness is for the most part denominated in our own currency is a huge advantage in the event the dollar were to come under significant downward pressure.”

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-05-12 05:04:30

This would explain how the stock market rally which started march 9 last year coincided to the day with the G20 summit on the credit crisis. So the whole move has been one enormous insider-trading deal. Nothing is real.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:34:01

This could potentially all come out in the Fed audit, no? I mean, using a ginormous bundle of newly-printed money created as a book entry on the Fed’s electronic balance sheet to buy up MBS and magically levitate the stock market hardly falls under the category of ordinary monetary policy operations, does it?

(Runs off to check his money and banking text book…)

Nope.

Comment by packman
2010-05-12 08:43:42

OK - I’m struggling to understand how anyone thought that this money might not have been created out of thin air. In other words - he’s basically just admitting what everyone already knew, and was in fact assumed - openly so - from the start, is he not?

What am I missing?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-05-12 08:54:23

I’m struggling to understand how anyone thought that this money might not have been created out of thin air….What am I missing?

You live near DC and you missed the bake sale?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 09:04:41

Everyone knew that Fed money comes from thin air…I don’t recall previously seeing an open admission that the money went straight to buying banker trash at full value and letting the rest of the country take the loss. I thought that so far we’d always pretended that we weren’t privatizing the profits and socializing the losses?

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:08:16

They are more open about it now because they know that the media won’t report on this and most people are fine with debasing our currency and economy if it means they might be able to cash in on their overpriced house.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:08:38

“I don’t recall previously seeing an open admission that the money went straight to buying banker trash at full value and letting the rest of the country take the loss.”

Bingo. That seems to stray from the normal conduct of monetary policy into the realm of wealth reallocation. Sounds to me like this makes the Fed’s MBS purchase program fair game for the auditors to question, no?

 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:02:04

Everyone knew that Fed money comes from thin air…I don’t recall previously seeing an open admission that the money went straight to buying banker trash at full value and letting the rest of the country take the loss. I thought that so far we’d always pretended that we weren’t privatizing the profits and socializing the losses?

Yes.

Here’s the thing then. Why the hell are people so focused on the TARP as a bailout, and completely ignoring the $1.3 Trillion bailout being given directly to the banks by the Fed???

The Fed bailout is worse in fact:
- It was done without Congressional oversight
- It’s done with nearly zero public transparency*
- It probably was given to just a few big Wall Street banks, not to a more even and fair spread of banks as the TARP was.
- It’s a tax on all the populace, via inflation, instead of Treasury spending which is progressive.**

* Hopefully that’ll change soon, with the audit. I’m not counting on it though.

** Not that I’m in favor of progressive income tax. But it’s at least supposed to be what we have in place. Fed-created money gets around this.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2010-05-12 20:07:51

I think the rationale goes something like this: “Any action, no matter how many perverse incentives it creates or how much economic injustice it creates, or how many innocent people are forcibly deprived of wealth to pay off the guilty, it’s all necessary if it HELPS THE BANKS.”

It seems to me that this economy is way too dependent on “financial engineering” for its wealth.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:21:06

“Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke admitted the central bank created $1.3 trillion out of thin air…”

Do you know of another way to create fiat money? If so, please share your revelation.

“…to buy mortgage backed securities.”

Aren’t there laws regulating the quality of the assets the Fed purchases? Toxic MBS don’t exactly rise to the same credit quality standards as U.S. Treasurys. And I am wondering how the Fed made sure they did not accidentally overpay, generating windfall profits for the banks which sold them the toxic MBS, given the market for these was just a wee bit thin at the time the purchases were made?

Comment by Jim A.
2010-05-12 06:18:17

“accidentally”? Wasn’t that more of an on purpose? After all, if the market price for this poo was sufficient to keep the banks solvent, the Fed wouldn’t have been buying it.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 06:26:13

Next time I promise to include sarcasm tags.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by exeter
2010-05-12 06:28:45

I think there is actual progress on this. The senate vote was unanimous yesterday. My speculative side says this will unleash some fury on a global basis if the pace continues.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 08:51:49

Why were the Senators so tightly united in their decision to audit the Fed? Is this a hint that they suspect foul play? I am personally wondering what was the legal basis for the Fed to print up a godzillion dollars to snap up toxic mortgages; does their charter provide for turning their balance sheet into a toxic mortgage superfund site?

 
 
 
Comment by James
2010-05-12 06:24:23

Oh, way back in 2006, the Fed decided to take on lesser quality collateral for loans. Then to pay interest on deposits as another bailout.

Not sure how this effects velocity of money and total money supply.

Like any kind of debt, it is money. However the Fed can also call up banks to repay that money to suck up that debt as well.

 
Comment by denquiry
2010-05-12 07:14:53

I wonder how many MBS’s they bought from Goldman Sach’s?

Comment by michael
2010-05-12 07:24:53

awww…come on…most everyone has paid back their TARP money…and the government MADE MONEY!

(I swear I want to puke when I hear the sheeple say this)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DinOR
2010-05-12 07:31:11

michael,

Exactly, and I don’t know why wmbz would elect to take up our vauluable time w/ non-newsworthy events such as this? Like $1.3 T is some… big deal or something?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-05-12 09:03:20

awww…come on…most everyone has paid back their TARP money…and the government MADE MONEY!

(I swear I want to puke when I hear the sheeple say this)

What is the best way to counter this misconception in a couple sentences?

Maybe?:

Yes they paid back the TARP loans however the loans were a small part of the bailout. A bigger part of the bailout that the news is not talking about is the fact that FED and the GSE’s “bought” many of the toxic mortgage assets from the banks at inflated prices. This kept bad banks from failing and now the American taxpayer is on the hook for all that trash that the banks were able to unload.

??

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:11:57

Didn’t a bunch of the crooks pay back the loans with more loans, or was that just GM?

As for the rest, I assume the reason for the stock market’s rise on hot air the past year was to make cash for the banks to pay back TARP. That, and lure in investors who will be smashed when the next engineered crash takes place.

 
Comment by michael
2010-05-12 10:17:47

“Yes they paid back the TARP loans however the loans were a small part of the bailout. A bigger part of the bailout that the news is not talking about is the fact that FED and the GSE’s “bought” many of the toxic mortgage assets from the banks at inflated prices. This kept bad banks from failing and now the American taxpayer is on the hook for all that trash that the banks were able to unload.”

when i respond with this they come back with something like…”damn mike…you just want the entire system to fail…you want people starving in the streets”.

 
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2010-05-12 05:34:20

IMO your post offers a clue as to just how much money has been destroyed so far in this Great Contraction and how much money is scheduled to be destroyed and how desperate the PTBs are in trying to keep the system working.

Desperate times call for desperate measures and all that. Print up a trillion dollars and throw them into a black hole and it still won’t be enough.

Cash will continue it’s rule because it’s destruction will outpace it’s creation.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 07:41:28

Cash will continue it’s rule because it’s destruction will outpace it’s creation.

Seems to me that there’s nothing holding them back from creating as much cash as they want. I suspect the only thing holding them back is the fear of hyperinflation.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:14:09

The goal is to find a way to convince the sheeple that hyperinflation will be good for them. It will making “housing go up!” but it will also lead to mass poverty and economic ruin. The banksters don’t care about that, but they might be a wee bit concerned about the population’s reaction to impoverishment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 09:56:10

Agreed, especially since wages won’t keep pace with hyperinflation. The payment on the McMansion will become affordable (if you have a fixed rate loan), but watch out for everything else: energy, food, clothing, healthcare, etc. And of course all bets are off if you lose your job.

 
Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 10:54:58

First person in a real, non-gov’t job who gets a raise must post it here! Then we’ll know the flood gates have opened.

 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:07:42

First person in a real, non-gov’t job who gets a raise must post it here! Then we’ll know the flood gates have opened.

If all the new jobs are government jobs - then it doesn’t matter if the raises come in the private sector or not, because the private sector is becoming increasingly irrelevant to the economy.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 12:53:17

I think I’ve heard several techies mention getting raises this year. I got a small one, and was surprised to see it.

 
Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 13:31:35

Guess trouble’s in the pipeline already, then, if techies are getting raises. Nobody I know is, but then I’m in the lovable, but struggling, MSM.

 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2010-05-12 06:49:15

can you post a link to the video? if there is one.

 
Comment by rms
2010-05-12 06:54:50

“This shocking admission came from the Joint Economic Committee hearing on Capital Hill last week.”

Shocking? I doubt it.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2010-05-12 07:11:14

“Bernanke Admits Printing $1.3 Trillion Out Of Thin Air” because he believed that $1.3 Trillion disappeared into thin air.

If they don’t hit it right, you get inflation or deflation. But even if they do, you get redistribution of well being in a way that no one would have dared to suggest.

Comment by oc-ed
2010-05-12 08:11:42

IMHO one goal is to keep things on a muddle through basis until the bubble resets play out in Nov 2012. If they can keep those “values” propped up to that point then there is a chance the market could actually rise to support that valuation without any artificial underpinning. A chance, but not a good one for the simple reason that the very act of injecting liquidity to prop things up is altering the economic environment for the worse. Any hope that we will have a truly robust economy may be a pipe dream if confidence in the USD fades and rates are forced higher.

It is interesting to see a flight to US Treasuries as this Greece thing played out and then the 50% plus rate jump in the 30 yr Treasuries when the Eurobailout was announced on Monday was an eye catcher.

I am unschooled in the ways of the merchant, but this circus is certainly an interesting thing to behold.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:17:46

That’s what I’ve been wondering: is there really any situation that will force the Fed’s hand and end this madness? What is to stop them from keeping rates at 0% forever, ignoring inflation when it appears, and otherwise blowing Bubbles? If they blow the right Bubbles, the sheeple will be happy (while ignoring their crumbling living standards), so some outside force has to put a limit on this madness, right?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:10:24

so some outside force has to put a limit on this madness, right?

Yes in fact - this was written about years ago.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 17:22:28

Ah, nuts…

I was sort of hoping it wouldn’t take The Four Horsemen to stop the Fed… although that does sound like a strange idea for a B grade movie…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Lesser Fool
2010-05-12 08:43:23

All senators who voted NO on this bill voted AGAINST an audit of the Fed. This vote reveals who is on the side of the people and who is with the banksters. These 62 traitors need to be VOTED OUT in December. Make your vote count!

http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00138

Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:25:41

+1

 
Comment by james
2010-05-12 11:43:22

Al Franken voted nay. Hmmm.

Interesting.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2010-05-12 12:36:26

Also a number of Republicans voted Nay and some Dems voted Yea. Very wierd for this Senate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Lesser Fool
2010-05-12 13:04:47

Letter sent by me to Senator Diane Feinstein. Copy also sent to Barbara Boxer.

==================================

Ms Feinstein,… See More
I am appalled that you would vote against the Senate amendment 3760: Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 that would provide the transparency your esteemed leader promised us. The supposed reason, that revealing this information would cause a panic, a run on financial institutions and the collapse of our economy is an insult to our intelligence and a travesty of liberty. This was the same argument given by you and your ilk when you passed the TARP and other alphabetic soups, CLEARLY going against the will of your constituents. Are you going to continue to use this argument to erode every single right that we have? Do you think that you have better judgement than us? Who are you to go against the people?

Crony capitalism and corporatism, which you are promoting, is a dastardly and traitorous act for which I hope you will be punished severely come the November elections. I for one will be voting for your opponent, and will be encouraging all my friends and colleagues to do the same.

Shame on you madam!!

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:06:31

Exactly.

The “fix” is in, and it will involve runaway inflation, higher taxes, and a significantly lower standard of living for many, particularly those who use dollars (or currency) - not debt - to survive.

The people don’t care so long as “housing only goes up,” American Idol is on, and there’s a new scam into which they can “invest.”

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:34:35

One sixth of our population already has a “lower standard of living.” Some might even say “living in poverty.”

I must have misheard when I was growing up when they said this was “the land of opportunity.” They must have said it was “the land of opportunists.”

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 17:24:14

True: the bankers won’t stop until there’s nothing but slums and gated compounds for the elite.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by mikey
2010-05-12 09:37:20

Invest in Spooks!!

This CL gem was just to precious to overlook.

“$1200000 Haunted bed and breakfast (zion, illinois)

this huge victorian house built in 1903 and was a funeral home for awhile and now has 16 bedrooms and 14 bathrooms. It is turnkey and has lots of common areas as well as a sitting room in the turret. I have cd’s to show the paranormal activity, and there is more!”

sheridan at shiloh (google map) (yahoo map)
•Location: zion, illinois

Some Fool haunted by DEBT is my bet

:)

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 09:58:07

The people don’t care so long as “housing only goes up,” American Idol is on, and there’s a new scam into which they can “invest.”

The latter (new scams) are a must, or people won’t be able to afford to eat.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 13:36:57

Get employed or be priced out forever! They aren’t making any more jobs!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-05-12 14:10:48

“Bernanke Admits Printing $1.3 Trillion Out Of Thin Air”

and for my next trick, I will make 4 million jobs disappear.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 16:15:53

I thought the next trick was making dimes out of quarters?

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 03:12:56

F&F are one damn sick joke, that will continue to burn untold dollars…

Fannie, Freddie aid cost unclear: regulator

(Reuters) - It is unclear how much U.S. taxpayers will eventually have to shell out to help mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the regulator of the two companies said on Tuesday.

“The actual cost I do not know,” Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco said in response to a question from Kentucky Republican Senator Jim Bunning at a Senate Finance Committee hearing.

Fannie Mae said on Monday it would need an additional $8.4 billion from the U.S. Treasury. The two firms have now tapped about $145 billion from the government and the Obama administration has said it will backstop losses, no matter how high they go, through 2012.

As a result, some Republican lawmakers are pushing for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to be included among firms subject to a tax aimed at financial institutions that received government money during the financial crisis.

Comment by James
2010-05-12 06:26:39

What is the point of that? Taxing back money we just handed them? Wouldn’t it make more sense to control the pay for officers and tax the bond holders?

Another level of taxation for what? Any money you take back this way will be more money they need to stay solvent.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:35:55

Churn, baby, churn
Disco inferno
Churn, baby churn!

 
 
Comment by arizonadude
2010-05-12 06:30:15

They will milk this mess as long as the govt keeps sending them blank checks.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 03:17:39

Schwarzenegger Preps ‘Terrible Cuts’ to Close Deficit (Update1)

(Bloomberg) — California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger will seek “terrible cuts” to eliminate an $18.6 billion budget deficit facing the most-populous U.S. state through June 2011, his spokesman said.

Schwarzenegger, 62, who will introduce his revised budget plans on May 14, has said he won’t seek tax increases to bolster California’s finances. The Republican’s forecast for the budget gap may rise after revenue fell short of his targets last month.

“We can’t get through this deficit without very terrible cuts,” Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear told reporters in Sacramento. “We don’t believe that raising taxes right now is the right thing to do.”

California’s revenue in April, when income-tax payments are due, trailed the governor’s estimates by $3.6 billion, or 26 percent. The gap wiped out gains from the previous four months, leaving collections $1.3 billion behind projections for the budget year that ends in June.

Schwarzenegger’s newest plan will revise the proposals introduced in January to account for the tax-collection shortages. In January, the governor said California may have to eliminate entire welfare programs, including the main one that provides cash and job assistance to families below the poverty line, without an influx of cash from the federal government.

Comment by Jim A.
2010-05-12 06:20:43

So, are they going to eliminate that homebuyer’s assistance program?

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-05-12 08:43:38

Are you crazy? Arnold said “terribe” cuts, not armageddon-inducing ones.

 
 
Comment by arizonadude
2010-05-12 06:22:03

How about firing some of the staff?

 
Comment by mikey
2010-05-12 07:34:25

Sings the old CA road to poorhouse blues chant and shuffle…

“I’m your Hollywood Debtdeterminator”

:(

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 09:42:16

“…the governor said California may have to eliminate entire welfare programs…”

Geez, the prison guards union is going to have to work “over-time” to keep funding increases rising ain’t they? :-)

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-05-12 11:47:18

“In January, the governor said California may have to eliminate entire welfare programs, including the main one that provides cash and job assistance to families below the poverty line, without an influx of cash from the federal government.”

In essence he’ll be sending them off to other states.

Phew! That was easy.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2010-05-12 12:38:54

Or countries.

 
 
Comment by Lesser Fool
2010-05-13 08:59:32

As long as they don’t eliminate any of the following:

1. New state tax credit of $10000 for first-time homebuyers
2. Capital gains exclusion tax on $250000 for singles, or $500000 for couples, from the sale of primary residence
3. Tax deduction on mortgage and property tax payments
4. 1031 exchange
5. Prop 13

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 03:20:10

CNBC’s Rick Santelli Rips Key Democrat For Ignoring Fannie/Freddie Reform
Dems’ Financial “Reform” Leaves Taxpayers on the Hook for Government Mortgage Giants ~ Washington

Democrats still don’t get it, and they refuse to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government mortgage companies that sparked the meltdown by giving high-risk loans to people who couldn’t afford it. Standing up for American taxpayers, CNBC’s on-air editor, Rick Santelli teed off on Rep. Paul Kanjorski’s (D-PA) claim that Democrats’ couldn’t reform Fannie & Freddie in their financial regulation bill because it was “too complicated,” asking: “It’s too complicated?

You think taxpayers that go to work to pay the money you are subsidizing, it will end up a half a trillion, do you think they think complicated is an excuse?”

Comment by oxide
2010-05-12 05:47:45

“government mortgage companies that sparked the meltdown by giving high-risk loans to people who couldn’t afford it.”

I seem to recall that F&F were NOT government mortgage companies at the time they were giving high-risk loans. They were semi-private entity chasing profits to please their stakeholders, on the back of the “implicit” gov guarantee. Socializing the losses as usual.

And shouldn’t Santelli be the one least able to criticize? Why is it ok for the gov to bail out Santelli’s precious trader-banks but not F&F?

Comment by basura
2010-05-12 07:31:57

Why do you assume that those people who oppose bailout to F&F automatically supported Bankers’ bailout?

Can we at least get a little bit of an intellectual honesty from people still hopped on Obama ganja?

 
Comment by Steamed Bean
2010-05-12 11:09:17

I think Santelli was pretty strongly opposed to TARP.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-05-12 11:50:48

His rant sparked the Tea Party. Course, then he had to back away after receiving his (alledged) CNBC smackdown.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2010-05-12 11:55:00

If it’s “too complicated” we need to cut them off now. I always thought the saying was to invest in things you understand. Why are we throwing money at something that’s “too complicated”?

 
 
Comment by Brett
2010-05-12 03:32:13

Good morning everyone. In a couple of hours, I am spending money in the worst possible according to this forum: plastic surgery!
I am having my nasal hump fixed!
And you know what? I paid cash!!!
I was able to get an appontment with a highly desired doctor within 5 weeks; plus, I got a nice discount for paying cash… Ha!
Wish me good luck!

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-05-12 05:33:23

You think you’re the only one making larger purchases w/cash? LOL

 
Comment by arizonadude
2010-05-12 06:24:17

Good luck dude.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-05-12 06:27:39

Good looking people are the first hired in a depression…..gotta put on a false front for clients.

Comment by drumminj
2010-05-12 08:36:56

Good looking people are the first hired in a depression…..

Guess I must be good looking, then, since I was able to find a new job :) Sweet!

Comment by basura
2010-05-12 08:56:46

Welcome to the club.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:20:57

It is part of the New Future, where appearances count first and ability last.

This is what society wanted; too bad most of us didn’t have a vote on the matter.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:38:46

It’s always been that way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ACH
2010-05-12 06:45:55

“nasal hump” ? What is that? Hmm.

A truly beautiful, sexy, desirable woman that I once knew had a large aquiline nose. She was steaming hot. Oh My Oh My little goodness! LOL! Ahhh, my misspent youth in New Orleans. If there is ever another oil boom in that town, I recommend that it not be missed.;) When DID small noses become the standard of beauty? Oh, and lest I forget those gross, fat injected lips, cheap “hooter” jobs, hair implants, and liposuction this and that. There is a woman that I used to work with who had lipo on her “saddlebags”. She thought that she looked great. I didn’t say anything but I thought she ruined some really nice “eyecandy” by becoming “perfect.” Oh well.

BTW, wasn’t Telly Savalas considered about the sexiest guy around way back in the day? Wasn’t he spear bald? I just can’t see hair implants being an improvement. I won’t dye my hair, either. It’s gray and getting grayer.

Can I have some reality that isn’t a stupid TV show?

Roidy

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 07:49:08

I also am no fan of the little upturned nose! But thin lips are sad.

Comment by ACH
2010-05-12 08:43:04

Oh, thin lips are fine. It’s her beauty and what she was born with.

Roidy

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by basura
2010-05-12 08:57:56

Never trust a man or woman with no lips.

 
 
Comment by mikey
2010-05-12 08:52:13

I hope that you have better results than that once cute actress from Dirty Dancing and Ferris Bueller’s day Off, Jennier Grey, with the beak job.

“Of the experience she said, “I went in the operating room a celebrity – and came out anonymous. It was like being in a witness protection program or being invisible.”

Nobody, not even her friends, recognized her afterwards because she looked plain Jane with a generic nose !!

:(

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 08:58:56

I LIKED her nose … Remember when the whole world seemed to want Streisand to get a nose job. She decided against it, supposedly, because it could affect her singing. Not because it was a dumb idea?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 09:06:56

I agree, the Jennifer Grey thing is just sad.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-05-12 11:58:36
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 12:58:48

No, but I agree that she became much more generic. I realize that in an ideal world we wouldn’t judge by appearance, but there’s something subliminal that made her the cute underdog before…and now…just another Hollywood chick. I’m not sure why I find the slightly “flawed” so much more interesting than the blandly beautiful. Maybe I subliminally think their life experience will be more interesting, or they will have a more pleasant attitude.

 
 
 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-05-12 09:27:33

OK, Brett, I’ll bite. Don’t do it. I’ll bet you look just fine without surgery. Save the money.

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 13:56:26

Hah, maybe we all have faces made for the Web. But don’t you wonder about those poor folks you see who have some bulbous, round thing in the middle of their face? Perhaps they don’t have the cash to get it removed. Always seems a little tragic to me.

 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-05-12 03:32:22

Let taxpayers cover your mortgage
Tami Luhby, senior writer
May 12, 2010

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Unemployed? Owe more on your mortgage than your home is worth? Your state might one day pay your mortgage.

Giving people free money to cover their home loans is just one of the radical ways that four states — Florida, Michigan, California and Arizona — plan to use $1.4 billion the Obama administration is sending their way to help the unemployed and underwater avoid foreclosure.

Many consumer advocates have said the government should help cover the payments of these troubled homeowners, lest the mortgage crisis continue spinning out of control and dragging down everyone’s property values. But other housing experts warn that paying off loans creates a moral hazard and could actually dissuade people from looking for work.

Innovative programs, however, are exactly what the administration was hoping for when it unveiled the Hardest Hit Fund initiative in February. Officials are looking to help the unemployed and underwater, who are now at the heart of the crisis. Despite the administration’s best efforts to stabilize the market, home prices are still sliding and foreclosure filings are at record highs.

States have radical ideas to stop foreclosures
The federal government is doling out a total of $2.1 billion to 10 states, which also include Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Rhode Island, Ohio and Oregon. The others have not yet submitted their plans to Treasury for approval or have not made them public.

Administration officials will spend the next few weeks reviewing the proposals, but Assistant Treasury Secretary Michael Barr told CNNMoney.com that they contained some good ideas.

But delinquent homeowners aren’t the only ones who would benefit from these subsidies. In fact, the banks would come away with a huge win, said Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at The Cato Institute. Not only would they have government money securely in hand, but they’d avoid the time and expense of the foreclosure process.

Another concern is that these proposals will dissuade the unemployed from finding work or from relocating to an area with better job prospects, said Casey Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago. Such programs incent people to maintain their financial hardships.

“Why should anybody work if you are going to be in your house either way?” he said.

Comment by polly
2010-05-12 05:49:37

Yet another example of people assuming this is a liquidity crisis, not a solvency crisis.

Comment by Jim A.
2010-05-12 07:25:14

Yep. There’s a whole lot of debt that is NEVER going to be paid off. These assets (bonds, RE etc) will not “recover” if we just wait a little while. I mean, there certainly WAS a liquidity crisis, but flooding the market with liquidity does little to fix underlying balance sheet issues, it just changes whose balance sheet has a giant sucking hole in it.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:11:08

“There’s a whole lot of debt that is NEVER going to be paid off.”

Couldn’t the Fed, in principle, just expand its balance sheet, pay off whatever debt it wants to, then never again mention the toxic assets that it hid away in its virtual vault?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:40:45

Well said polly. Nailed it.

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-05-12 10:18:46

Remember “Good Bank, Bad Bank”? I think the Fed wants to make itself the martyr Bad Bank and save everybody. That is why Bernanke is man of the year. Couldn’t you just hug him!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-05-12 10:46:10

Polly, It occurs to me that part of the problem is that central bankers CAN do something about liquidity problems, and little to nothing about terminaly bad balance sheets. It’s like going to the doctor and he tells you that “there’s about a 90% chance that you’ve got fatal stomach cancer, keep taking those antacids.” “Why? those won’t cure cancer.” “Yeah, but there’s a 10% chance that you have heartburn, and THAT we can help you with.”

 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:28:55

Yet another example of people assuming this is a liquidity crisis, not a solvency crisis.

I’ll second that with a +1.

(and probably steal it from time to time)

 
 
Comment by oxide
2010-05-12 05:57:34

1.4 billion over 4 states. At an average mortgage of, say $350K, that 1.4 billion will buy you…what? 4000-5000 houses at most.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 05:59:05

“4000-5000 houses”

Two month’s worth of San Diego foreclosure notices

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:25:42

Extend and pretend… just gotta get to the 2010 election, and then who cares!?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 06:24:42

Does this deal apply retroactively? I am wondering if I could claim a reimbursement for past mortgage payments I made while I was unemployed?

 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-05-12 06:25:11

But delinquent homeowners aren’t the only ones who would benefit from these subsidies. In fact, the banks would come away with a huge win, said Mark Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at The Cato Institute. There, I fixed it for you. Because most of the severly underwater would have a better balance sheet if they went through foreclosure and bankruptcy to get debt forgiveness than if they gove government help feeding the alligator for a few more months.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:23:39

It’s ideas like this one that looked like they were ripped from The Onion that worry me… when The Onion is no longer at the forefront of insanity, it is really a bad sign!

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:42:02

What?! You thought the Onion was fake?

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 17:26:07

No, I consider them a harbinger of what is to come - but reality is becoming so stupid, so fast, that even the Onion can’t keep up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-05-12 04:00:49

Another day, more oil spill. Wonder how it is going to end, or if. Just lower BP, Transocean and Halliburton execs into that containment dome and use them to plug the leak. Less fuss than useless Congressional hearings.

Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-05-12 04:15:42

This should offer solace to those working in the fishing, tourism, etc industries in the affected areas.

Telegraph.co.uk
May 10th 2010

BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward said that the new plan is to have an oil-barrel-sized container at the leak site, a mile down from the water’s surface, within 72 hours. Then oil would be siphoned up to a tanker.

Mr Hayward rejected the notion that BP, one of the world’s largest oil companies, was ill prepared to deal with such an incident.

“Frankly, it’s been far more effective than any spill response hitherto in terms of containment offshore and preventing oil from getting to the shore. That is a fact,” he said.

“This is the largest, most comprehensive spill response mounted in the United States oil and gas industry by probably two orders of magnitude.”

Comment by palmetto
2010-05-12 04:39:53

Jeeezo Pete’s, is this guy delusional, or what? OK, there’s been a huge “response”, but not, as far as I can see, anything effective.

When a technology can so adversely affect people, places and things when there’s an accident, it just shouldn’t be used until there’s an EFFECTIVE plan for mitigation in the event of adverse circumstances.

To be sure, underwater drilling has been going on for some time without such an event, but as we’ve seen, that doesn’t mean it can’t happen.

I really hope BP is broken by this event. It should have to pay and pay and pay until all adverse effects are mitigated.

Comment by ACH
2010-05-12 06:53:30

palmetto,
Here is a scenario that may have happened.
There are a number of managers and engineers from the various companies involved sitting in a meeting for a Q&A session on the drilling well design.
Engineer#1: What if we want to shut the well down during an emergency at the well head?
Engineer#2: Well, we have the blowout preventer that will automatically shutoff if there is a problem.
Engineer#1: Oh, ok. I see.
E#1 presented a perfectly reasonable question. E#2 gave a perfectly reasonable answer. The problem was that the answer did not match the question. The question was about an emergency shutdown and the answer was about a blow out prevention technique. I see this a lot. Answers do not match the questions.

Roidy

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by James
2010-05-12 07:38:28

Oh, from an engineering standpoint there are plenty of failures you would never expect or could do anything about. It’s not like we have satellites go zombie on purpose or oil rigs explode intentionally.

Sometimes you plan and plan and nature surprises you.

Other times you make a reasonable assumption on risk. Or think you did.

Other times management brings out a stick and fires anyone who dissents on dangerous action. Hence me finding a new gig.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ACH
2010-05-12 08:41:13

“Other times management brings out a stick and fires anyone who dissents on dangerous action. Hence me finding a new gig.”

Yes, yes. Accountants and business majors firing the nay-saying engineering majors, and then blaming them when it all goes horribly wrong. It isn’t the Quants on WS, it’s the CEOs who directed them, as an example.

No problem. I’ve watched the destruction of the ecology and economy of the lower half of my beloved Louisiana, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama, too. Why would I get angry? Just because I spent my life in those marshes and fishing offshore?

Gee, my wife and I had a very steamy honeymoon on Perdido Key when it was deserted in the off-season. I guess we won’t be going back anytime soon.

The Idiots.

Roidy

 
Comment by mikey
2010-05-12 09:15:20

This deep H20 oil well disaster was a BP Managenent Risk for big profits.

They accepted it …and “Blew It”. The gov’t and the US Public share some of the blame for allowing this crap to happen.

This isn’t freakin’ spilt milk running out of the earth into the gulf.

There needs to be some heavy duty accountablity, better R & D engineering technology and better enforcement with real time monitoring of safety and environment regs for sure.

 
Comment by james
2010-05-12 09:23:19

Roidy,

Not sure what to tell you here. I’m a senior engineer doing various management tasks and engineering. You get judgement calls on risk and if you make unpopular calls, like I have done, you get pushed out of the company.

When the programs have big over runs or other costly failures, everyone holds their hands up and says “whocouldanode”.

You don’t get any significant protection from the government unless you uncover massive fraud. Not for finding things like massive inefficiency or excess risk.

And you don’t want to go to court and try and argue fine technical points in front of a judge or jury. Companies pull some PhDs out of the woodwork and everyone bows to the “expert”.

Every once in a very rare while you have a big investigation that uncovers something, like the challenger incident. Most of the time it’s burried in technical jargon.

Give everyone a hint though, you’ve got managers that are driven by short term milestones and sucesses. Just like wallstreet and origination. Those guys will hear the answers that get them their checks. Unless its clearly obvious that immediate failure will result, you get risky behavior with consequences pushed down the line.

See the BP disaster, the TARP disaster, FRE/FAN, Challenger…

Can you imagine what it was like for the engineers presenting that they needed to do a 50 million dollar modification to the space shuttle? Or to the BP platform.

Then nothing happens for a long time… till something does happen.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:54:21

Dead on, James. Seen this too many times in all aspects of life.

However, you can’t wait for everything to be perfect or nothing would ever get done, because you truly can’t guarantee 100% safety in life.

But you CAN increase the odds in your favor. And not trying to do so and persecuting anyone who tries, IS stupid.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 09:57:49

Mother Nature to humans: ;-)

“Eh, you fu#kup again?…no worries…it’ll have little “long term” impact on your “Manifest Destiny” …now get back out there…do good things, be well, …I’ll keep in touch.”

Hwy subscribes to an old Taoist notion of “environmental law”:

“Do Nothing”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:12:44

“Other times you make a reasonable assumption on risk. Or think you did.”

Do you mean like the Megabanks who operated the toxic subprime lending sump pump thought they did? I guess given that they have been bailed out and are in the green now, their risk assessments paid off handsomely.

 
Comment by james
2010-05-12 13:23:54

CIBT or FPSS or PB or GS… or whomever you are today…

My take is the banks misrepresented the risk while engaging in front running activities.

You see a history of the GS positions and they are 99% to the short side. Also like to see the derivatives products. Probably also mostly short positions.

Hard to reconcile that with what they sold to all of the pension funds.

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:29:10

I always get a laugh out of how the executives proudly trumpet “their” successes - as if the company wouldn’t exist without them - and demand pay to match, but when something goes wrong, suddenly they are not accountable, nobody could have known, just give me my bonuses and stop asking questions, etc. Right…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 10:14:22

Or worse, its the little people’s fault.

 
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2010-05-12 05:33:20

“Mr Hayward rejected the notion that BP, one of the world’s largest oil companies, was ill prepared to deal with such an incident.”

Really?! So their plan was to release millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico?

“This is the largest, most comprehensive spill response mounted in the United States oil and gas industry by probably two orders of magnitude.”

Comprehensive PR response.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 07:50:16

That’s what they get paid for.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-05-12 12:44:50

“This is the largest, most comprehensive…..by probably two orders of magnitude.”

Because it is (what appears to be) a fookup by BP by probably two orders of magnitude.

Your contingency planning should develop plans for failures that are reasonably foreseeable. Including fookups caused by human error. Assuming you believe the MSM, this scenario was foreseen, and other oil companies had equipment/planning in place to prevent and/or limit the damage caused by an event like this.

Say what you will about the Trial/Product Liability lawyers, but the fact that they can and will bring suit for damages means that there is a pretty good possibility that the truth will eventually be known about the decision making process at BP, or lack thereof.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 04:21:43

‘We are once again the schmucks of Europe!’ German media’s verdict as anger at Greek bailout swells.

German anger at the 750billion Euro Greek bailout is swelling as world markets slid after initial excitement at the bailout fizzled.

The headline on the front page of Germany’s biggest newspaper, Bild, summed up the national mood, declaring: ‘We are once again the schmucks of Europe!’

Meanwhile world stocks and the Euro dropped sharply today as the massive relief rally triggered by the plan to contain Europe’s debt crisis fizzled out.

Comment by Lip
2010-05-12 08:02:03

At least the Germans realize they’re getting screwed. Here in the good ole USA we just keep plugging along, creating money with the keystroke of an office computer.

Let me see, how does BB do it? Oh, I think I’ll deposit $1 and then add ($1,000,000,000,000) 12 zeros accidentally on purpose.

What a friggen mess! Is there one governmental agency that isnt’ bleeding red in?

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 09:57:44

I think NASA has been returning $13 to the economy for every $1 it spent. (science & tech spin-offs)

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:27:59

All we need are just a couple of “good ideas” …how many kids did they let in @ Cal-Tech this year?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:32:05

Yeah but $12.99 of that is all just velcro. ;)

Seriously - got a source for that? You’ve piqued my curiosity.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 13:43:16

You’ll have to google. NASA of course has it on their website, but I have confirmed this from several other parties in the past. I don’t have those on hand at his moment.

And I have been to their technology transfer program. They will GIVE (as in FREE) a lot of their technology to any business who can make money with it. The only catch is that you must show some sort of progress within one year or they take it back. This is on their website as well.

These are just a couple of reasons why I hate NASA bashers.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:44:36

Exactly. The only thing worse than realizing you are a schmuck who is getting screwed is to get screwed and not even realize it.

 
Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 13:59:21

Rest of them must be giggling … Nein schmuck, that’s swine, Herr MegaSausagebank. You do wonder how it can hold together, with the ancient resentments …

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-05-12 12:46:01

How do you say “Tea Party” in German?

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 13:00:59

Blitzkrieg?

 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-05-12 04:27:08

Ignoring the Elephant in the Bailout
New York Times

If you blinked, you might have missed the ugly first-quarter report last week from Freddie Mac, the mortgage finance giant that, along with its sister Fannie Mae, soldiers on as one of the financial world’s biggest wards of the state.

But taxpayers should examine Freddie’s first-quarter numbers not only because the losses are our responsibility. Since they also include details on Freddie’s delinquent mortgages, the company’s sales of foreclosed properties and losses on those sales, the results provide a telling snapshot of the current state of the housing market.

Serious delinquencies in Freddie’s single-family conventional loan portfolio — those more than 90 days late — came in at 4.13 percent, up from 2.41 percent for the period a year earlier. Delinquencies in the company’s Alt-A book, one step up from subprime loans, totaled 12.84 percent, while delinquencies on interest-only mortgages were 18.5 percent. Delinquencies on its small portfolio of option-adjustable rate loans totaled 19.8 percent.

The company’s inventory of foreclosed properties rose from 29,145 units at the end of March 2009 to almost 54,000 units this year. Perhaps most troubling, Freddie’s nonperforming assets almost doubled, rising to $115 billion from $62 billion.

When Freddie sells properties, either before or after foreclosure, it generates losses of 39 percent, on average.

Freddie Mac said the main reason for its disastrous quarter was an accounting change that required it to bring back onto its books $1.5 trillion in assets and liabilities that it had been keeping off of its balance sheet.

None of the grim numbers at Freddie are surprising, really, given that it and Fannie have pretty much been the only games in town of late for anyone interested in getting a mortgage. The problem for taxpayers, of course, is that the company’s future doesn’t look much different from its recent past.

Even as its business suffers through a sour real estate market, Freddie must pay hefty cash dividends on the preferred stock the government holds. After it receives the additional $10.6 billion it needs from taxpayers, dividends owed to Treasury will total $6.2 billion a year. This amount, the company said, “exceeds our annual historical earnings in most periods.”

In spite of these difficulties, Freddie and Fannie are nowhere to be seen in the various financial reform efforts under discussion on Capitol Hill. Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, offered a vague comment to Congress last March, that after some unspecified reform effort someday in the future, the companies “will not exist in the same form as they did in the past.”

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-05-12 12:52:30

Just think of Fannie/Freddy in the same way that you think about the Louisiana Purchase.

Except we are not buying “new” land. We are buying land that we’ve already paid for once. And we’re not buying land with lots of natural resources……we are buying stucco, Tyvek, and 2×4s, assembled with illegal immigrant labor, for the most part..

Other than that, they are practically the same.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 04:33:22

‘Perfect Quarter’ at Four U.S. Banks Shows Fed-Fueled Revival

May 12 (Bloomberg) — Four of the largest U.S. banks, including Citigroup Inc., racked up perfect quarters in their trading businesses between January and March, underscoring how government support and less competition is fueling Wall Street’s revival.

Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the first, second and fifth-biggest U.S. banks by assets, all said in regulatory filings that they had zero days of trading losses in the first quarter. Citigroup Inc., the third-largest, doesn’t break out its daily trading revenue by quarter. It recorded a profit on each trading day, two people with knowledge of the results said.

“The trading profits of the Street is just another way of measuring the subsidy the Fed is giving to the banks,” said Christopher Whalen, managing director of Torrance, California- based Institutional Risk Analytics. “It’s a transfer from savers to banks.”

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-05-12 05:20:38

Proof that when banks own the government they can’t lose. Amazing how that works.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:30:55

“…racked up perfect quarters in their trading businesses…”

Heads we win, tails you’re screwed.

 
Comment by cereal
2010-05-12 06:50:49

I invited the head traders of these banks to my house. They can use my Scottrade account and various computers laying around to demonstrate how they manage to trade in the black each and every day.

I have even offered to buy Subway for the whole crew.

Comment by oxide
2010-05-12 09:06:12

I’d buy an admission ticket to that. Heck I’d even throw in for the Subway white chocolate-macadamia nut cookies.

 
 
Comment by measton
2010-05-12 07:07:01

Underscoring how
Insider trading and manipulation of markets can make you money.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:34:05

Wow - who could have guessed that having a protected monoply and an infinite supply of free money could produce profits! Gee, I’m sure glad my savings are being debased to support the soulless bankster husks!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:00:10

BOHICA!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:24:26

The Financial Page
Debtor States
by James Surowiecki April 12, 2010

Another year, another crisis. If we spent last year worried that big banks were going to fail, the fear of the moment is that entire governments may go under. The anxieties about “sovereign debt” have been most acute in Europe, where the infelicitously named PIIGS countries—Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain—have huge debt burdens, and where Greece in particular is in dire need of assistance. (It owes four hundred billion dollars, against an annual G.D.P. of around three hundred and forty billion and shrinking.) And now people are wondering if American state governments are headed for their own Greek tragedy. Last week, the Times suggested that the states could be plunged into a debt crisis, and the Wall Street Journal asked, “Who Will Default First: Greece or California?”

It’s not an outlandish question. Besides great climates and lovely beaches, California and Greece share a fondness for dysfunctional politics and feckless budgeting. While American states are typically required to balance their budgets annually, that hasn’t stopped them from amassing a pile of long-term debt by issuing municipal bonds. And, like Greece and other E.U. countries, states have used accounting legerdemain to under-report the amount they owe, even while accumulating huge, unfunded pension obligations. Just as a default by Greece (whose bonds are held by many big European banks) would have nasty ripple effects across the European economy, a state-government default would have all sorts of unpleasant consequences, as state bonds have traditionally been considered a thoroughly safe investment.

For all this, though, the comparison has been overblown. Our states’ debt burden, while sizable, is far more manageable than that of the PIIGS, which owe three times as much relative to G.D.P. as American state and local governments. And though states will certainly have to cut their budgets again this year, the cuts will be smaller (and therefore more politically palatable) than those of, say, Ireland, which is cutting government spending by almost nine per cent. Most important, the states have a fundamental advantage over euro-zone nations: they’re part of a country, not an ill-defined union, so they can count on help from the federal government.

Much of the assistance that the states get from Washington is close to automatic: in normal times, the government sends almost half a trillion dollars in aid (for everything from Medicaid to highways and education) directly to the states. And it can generally be counted on to step up its efforts in a crisis; last year’s stimulus sent more than a hundred and fifty billion dollars to state and local governments. There’s a long-standing tradition of this: one of the federal government’s first acts was to assume the debts that states had run up during the American Revolution. This meant that frugal states had to help pay the debts of profligate ones. But the assumption was that closing gaps between the states by some measure of redistribution was in the national interest. The theory is that we hang together in times of trouble lest we all end up hanging separately

Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2010/04/12/100412ta_talk_surowiecki#ixzz0niXD3D88

Comment by Lip
2010-05-12 08:22:21

“While American states are typically required to balance their budgets annually, that hasn’t stopped them from amassing a pile of long-term debt by issuing municipal bonds. And, like Greece and other E.U. countries, states have used accounting legerdemain to under-report the amount they owe, even while accumulating huge, unfunded pension obligations.”

This is the key, if the reports show that the US and the states are x in dept and they have xx unfunded liabilities, AND YET THEY ARE FUDGING THE NUMBERS!!!

IMO the greatest source of wealth that is just sitting there is our savings, IRA’s and 401K’s. They have to find a way to tap that money.

Has anyone heard about the government looking to trade our retirements $$ for government annuities? I have searched but cannot find any articles on this subject.

Comment by oxide
2010-05-12 09:22:06

It’s still in the tinfoil hat stage. They only way they could do it is to couch it in Orwellian language so that no one knew they were doing it, through the Fed or some such nonsense. No congresscritter, and I mean NO congresscritter, would survive voting for such a thing.

IMO, there are two other sources of “wealth”: means-testing Social Security, and single-payer health care.

Comment by Lip
2010-05-12 10:27:38

Oxide,

You’re right, I was thinking I’m becoming a part of the tinfoil hat klan when I typed that message, but you know its not beyond them to try and do something like this. They just haven’t figured a way to do it and get re-elected again.
Once they do, it’ll be done.

Lip

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-05-12 09:37:13

They’ll get that money eventually: I still suspect Roth IRA’s will be taxed in the end just because I can’t imagine a possible source of loot going untapped in the coming years.

The banksters have claim to the 401k’s through market games - such as how well “buy and hold” has been working out over the past decade.

One trick might be for US bonds to be pitched as a safe investment, and then they can get folks to dump their retirement funds into mortgage backed trash, which will naturally crash in value.

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 14:04:24

Who has not wondered about that, with the Roth IRAs? Or that, in the current environment of rewarding those who do not plan, that the tax on 401(k)s just might be reduced or forgiven when it’s time for a cheap stimulus? I’m not buying a house, but I’m not switching to a Roth, either, and giving away my money up front. Who knows how things will play out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:03:48

This might be a good time for everyone to refresh their memory on CAFRs (Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports)

Every government, from your local podunk to the state level, in this nation is invested in the “market.”

Google it.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-05-12 12:26:33

Has anyone heard about the government looking to trade our retirements $$ for government annuities? I have searched but cannot find any articles on this subject.

This is the advantage of gold and a paid off house maybe. I can remember a couple examples of governments “freezing” peoples cash–Brazil and Argentina. In neither case did the governments go after houses. (Gold either because not enough people owned it to matter).

Here’s a link to an article discussing Brazilian money freezes, inflation’s tax, beating inflation and currency collapses. (just fun stuff)


From 1964 through 1994, the accumulated inflation rate in Brazil fetched 1,000,000,000,000,000 % (that´s one quatrillion percent)…First of all, the inflation was very convenient to the government; the Mint printed money around the clock, at a very low cost to the Treasury (the Treasury was collecting an inflationary tax); the Budget was fixed in nominal values, which were corroded very quickly, leaving the government with a carte blanche to spend the budget; by delaying payments (to suppliers, to servants, to people who won demands in Justice), the government was in fact getting discounts.

In 1990, the wildest plan of all, the Collor Plan. President Fernando Collor had taken office promising to kill the inflation with only one shot; accumulated inflation from March 89 to March 90 had been almost 5,000%. The main measure of the Collor Plan was to freeze all financial assets in bank accounts which exceeded a few thousand dollars (the money would be gradually returned to investors only after eighteen months); again, prices and salaries were frozen, budget expenses were cut, taxes were increased; the plan brought recession to Brazil, but didn´t stop inflation

http://www.v-brazil.com/business/Real-Plan.html

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:26:25

Sounds like the EuroTARP has fixed everything, and markets are back to normal again now.

Wednesday May 12, 2010

Bloomberg
Bank Swaps, Libor Show Doubts on Europe Bailout: Credit Markets
May 11, 2010, 11:10 AM EDT

More From Businessweek

* Corporate Bond Risk Rises in Europe, Credit-Default Swaps Show
* Barroso Says Any Attempt to Weaken Euro ?Will Fail?
* Weber Says ECB Bond Purchases Pose Significant Stability Risks
* Euro Is ?Oversold,? May Rally to $1.3115: Technical Analysis
* Crude Oil Rises After Chinese Refining Increases to a Record

By Abigail Moses and Shannon D. Harrington

May 11 (Bloomberg) — Money markets and the cost of protecting bank bonds from losses show investors are concerned Europe’s almost $1 trillion rescue plan may not be enough to contain the region’s sovereign debt crisis.

The Markit iTraxx Financial Index of credit-default swaps on European banks and insurers rose to 38 basis points more than the Markit iTraxx Europe Index tied to investment-grade companies from 31 yesterday. While the gap narrowed from 58 basis points before European leaders agreed to the rescue plan, the bank index on average has traded 10 basis points less the past three years. A measure of banks’ reluctance to lend also rose to more than three times the level from March.

The loan package for debt-laden nations including Greece is part of an attempt to stop a decline in the euro and stave off a sovereign default that would threaten recovery from the worst global recession since the 1930s. European financial companies, which hold more than 134 billion euros ($170 billion) in Greek, Portuguese and Spanish sovereign debt, are under scrutiny by investors concerned that they’re owed too much by Europe’s most- indebted countries.

“Sovereign risk hasn’t gone away in the slightest,” said Jim Reid, head of fundamental strategy in London for Deutsche Bank AG, Germany’s biggest bank. “What this package has done is massively reduce the tail risk in European markets without necessarily changing the medium- to long-term dynamics of financial markets.”

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:05:19

SHAM WOW!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:28:20

Bloomberg
Libor for Three-Month Dollars Climbs to Highest Since August
May 12, 2010, 7:47 AM EDT

By Keith Jenkins

May 12 (Bloomberg) — The rate banks say they pay for three-month loans in dollars rose to the highest level in almost nine months today.

The London interbank offered rate, or Libor, for such loans climbed almost 1 basis point to 0.430 percent, the highest level since Aug. 17, according to data from the British Bankers’ Association.

The Libor-OIS spread, a gauge of banks’ reluctance to lend, widened to 20.2 basis points, the most since Aug. 21.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-05-12 05:44:11

Cover Story
April 1, 2010, 5:00PM EST

Goldman Sachs: Don’t Blame Us

When it comes to its role in the financial crisis, Goldman Sachs has a message for the world: Not guilty. Not one bit

Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Blankfein Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

By Roben Farzad

The bankers at Goldman Sachs (GS), by traditional measures, ought to be on top of the world. Eighteen months removed from the depths of the financial crisis, Goldman posted a $13.4 billion profit in 2009, a Wall Street record. When Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein went on a recruiting trip to Stanford, he was greeted by an overflow crowd. Goldman cast off its Troubled Asset Relief Program yoke and proceeded to pay its employees more than $16 billion. The firm is moving into a new $2.1 billion headquarters on the Hudson River.

Goldman’s reputation with its clients—who must have at least $10 million to open an account—has never been better. Among the general public, however, the perception is that Goldman is the toxic epicenter of everything wrong with Wall Street. The firm’s 32,000 employees are seen as an army of Gordon Gekkos, greedy manipulators who pumped up the housing bubble, then bet opportunistically on its implosion as American International Group (AIG), its trading partner, buckled under massive debts. It is widely alleged—though unproven—that Goldman called on its close friends in government to arrange for an AIG bailout, effectively pocketing billions of taxpayer dollars. “Every game has a sucker,” says William K. Black, a professor of law and economics at the University of Missouri at Kansas City who was deputy director of the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp., “and in this case, the sucker was not so much AIG as it was the U.S. government and taxpayer.”

Heads Goldman wins, tails you lose, America.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:03:57

“…Goldman’s reputation with its clients—who must have at least $10 million to open an account”

So, that why GoldenmanSucks told me: “hmmm sorry, you need to go elsewhere”

Here I thought all this time it was because they somehow knew old Hwy50 really wasn’t a “Savvy Investor”

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:10:10

A business that represents the apex of American capitalism and the horror philosophy of social darwinism deserves no sympathy for its hypocrisy.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:30:35

It’s not sympathy they’re after, never has been… ;-)

(awesome summation in any regards, ecofeco)

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 14:10:20

And they’ve got a nice new building downtown, with a huge assist from N.Y. taxpayers, across the street from Ground Zero. They used to be low-key about their location, but they must be gaining in confidence, if that were possible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2010-05-13 00:18:10

Perhaps Goldman is a willing participant, along with Progressives in Government, in bringing about a total collapse of the Capitalist system and replacing it with some type of unrecognizable Fascist system where we have the Big Business/Government Elite and the rest of us.

An extreme theory…yes. You can not discount the role of Progressive elected officials in this mess. They intend to destroy the middle class and bring the U.S. down to a level equal to any other third world hell hole.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 05:50:48

Debt induced large-ass:

Todd Harrison

May 12, 2010, 12:01 a.m. EDT

The war on capitalism
Commentary: European leaders take aim at free markets

By Todd Harrison

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The capital market machination cracked last week and stopped functioning in an orderly manner.

A few short sessions — and $1 trillion dollars — later, many in the mainstream media declared that all is well in the world.

While calmer heads are quick to put the panic into perspective — the S&P 500 (SPX 1,156, -3.94, -0.34%) is a mere 5% from fresh 18-month highs — the system broke, if only for a short period of time. That, by definition, is a crash.

As I wrote last week, there are a few ways to view what happened, ranging from the obvious to the conspiratorial to the nonsensical. At the end of the day — and from this day forward — the takeaway has little to do with the “why” and everything to do with the “what.” (Read Minyanville’s “The 1000-point plunge.”)

Politicians were quick to declare war on the perceived culprits; German Chancellor Angela Merkel lashed out, saying “speculators are our adversaries” and she’s “resolved to win the battle against markets.” Senator Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said on Sunday that high-frequency trading created a “casino environment” where “finance is getting detached from the real economy.”

To be sure, there is plenty of blame to go around. As we’ve long posited in Minyanville, the spectrum of culpability stretches from over-extended consumers to institutions that financially engineered the markets to policymakers complicit by acceptance. While the system collapsed during the first phase of the financial crisis and snapped anew last week, those events were not the cause of concern — they were simply the effect.

Long-time readers of Minyanville understand the causal elements of cumulative imbalances and the societal ramifications of percolating class wars, as well as the potential pitfalls inherent in a finance-based, derivative-laced global economy. Those are among the reasons why we warned of “a prolonged period of socioeconomic malaise entirely more depressing than a recession” in the summer of 2006.
Emergency measures; deja vu!

We’ve long drawn the distinction between drugs that mask the symptoms and medicine that cures the disease, as well as the difference between a legitimate economic recovery and debt-induced largess.

Over the weekend, taking a page from the stateside playbook, the European Union crafted a $962 billion emergency loan package with hopes of containing the contagion. Read Minyanville’s “A Five-Step Guide to Contagion.”

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:07:48

6+ Billion humans is fundamentally a “natural receipt” for… equality.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:12:40

Never forget: “free market” is code for “free-to-bend-you-over-market.”

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2010-05-13 00:29:04

Yeah. Let’s have a bunch of college trained progressives in Government handle the markets. During the bubble years you at least had freedom of choice, greedy people made stupid decions and bent themselves over. With progressive government you make your choice with a gun to your head.

 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2010-05-12 05:55:43

Yesterday someone talked about salaries for Teachers. I wanted to talk more about salaries for PhDs getting hired in B-Schools in universities.

I can understand that salaries in top tier schools like Harvard etc. are high. Even the starting salaries range in 200K range for Assistant Professor at the top 10. But what about schools that are ranked like40th or 50th and starting salaries for Asst. Profs are still close to 150K for 9 months. And they make another 50K in summer.

One reasonI think is that many B-Schools have made their institutes as Factories to sell MBA, part-time MBA, Executive MBA etc. And they need more faculty to teach. This has created a huge demand in the past 6-7 years for Business Faculty.

But would this last for a long time. Google for DIamondback Salary Guide and it lists salaries for B-School in College Park. I didn’t see any Prof. making less than 140-150K and as high as 380K for 9 months.

Well, they write papers and educate the MBAs but looking at Wall Street it doesn’t look like this education is helping the country.

IS MBA degree a bluff?

Comment by DennisN
2010-05-12 08:04:47

Accreditation may be contingent on faculty salary.

I don’t know about B schools, but I do know that the ABA looks at faculty compensation as a factor in granting law school accreditation. If the average pay is too low the ABA won’t grant accreditation.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:10:43

“Rosebud…”Financial Innovation” stills needs quite a bit of “polishing”" ;-)

 
Comment by AdamCO
2010-05-12 14:33:17

my city planning professors used to make 60k-80k. Pretty fair, given their education and knowledge. Can’t speak for other departments. I went to a top 25 planning school, state university it was

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 06:00:22

BULLETIN Morgan Stanley loses 5% of market value in premarket trades following investigation report

MarketWatch dot com

 
Comment by django
2010-05-12 06:04:43

Just got a new 2009 Maserati listed for $131k for 88K. Thanks Stepn2 for risking your life for me so I can get cheap gas. Only 10 miles per gallon.

Comment by combotechie
2010-05-12 06:06:31

Stepn2 was in Afghanistan; what he risked his life for was cheap dope, not cheap gas.

 
Comment by palmetto
2010-05-12 06:50:57

I get the sarcasm, but that’s in incredibly poor taste. So funny, I forgot to laugh.

Stepn2 and his associates need to be on our southern border, not in Afghanistan. What’s being done to these soldiers is a travesty.

Comment by combotechie
2010-05-12 06:55:05

Poor taste? Afghanistan supplies 87 percent of the world’s supply of heroin.

“What’s being done to these soldiers is a travesty.”

Agree. These soldiers and the United States in general are being played.

Comment by palmetto
2010-05-12 07:16:48

That post was meant for django.

But yeah, we’re being played.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by django
2010-05-12 11:12:08

I agree. I was being ironic. It is a shame that soldiers are being sent to die and kill for OIla nd heroin. We need to live within our means and stop exploiting the rest of the world. IF Gas goes to $8 per gallon so be it. The free market will create alternate transportation, high speed rails , smaller houses , higher milage cars, car pools etc . People dont need to die around teh world or here so we can consume 25% of the worlds resources.

 
 
Comment by MrBubble
2010-05-12 09:19:11

Why do the words “Just got a new 2009 Maserati listed for $131k for 88K” sound so much like:

“I have massive feelings of inadequacy” or
“I molest Collies” or
“Screw everybody else” or
“I want a bigger share of trashing the planet” or
“Who cares?” or
“I got mine, sh1tbird” or
“I’m a complete d-bag” or
“I just can’t understand that the worm has turned and I just bought something impractical and pretentious that is likely to get me put first up against the wall, but whatever!”?

No matter the differences that Stepn2 and I have, that comment sucks on so many levels, even if sarcastic.

MrBubble

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-05-12 09:35:30

OK, what’s going on with male HBBers today? One is getting a nose job and another a Mazerati. Next thing you know, our friend CantankerousProfessorStuccoShoots is going to buy a McMansion in La Jolla with a jumbo loan.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 10:01:04

our friend CantankerousProfessorStuccoShoots is going to buy a McMansion in La Jolla with a jumbo loan.

Well duh! Everone in San Diego knows that there is no life east of I-5!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:17:42

“…our friend CantankerousProfessorStuccoShoots is going to buy a McMansion in La Jolla with a jumbo loan” ;-)

Awesome! I relish the “opportunity” to show Mr. Cole how to paper a “got stucco” house in the modern era…(Hwy50 laments that “back-in-the-day, it might result in a “summons”…now… “1st strike felony” (even if you show evidence to the court that you used bio-degradable” paper)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:46:23

OK, what’s going on with male HBBers today? One is getting a nose job and another a Mazerati. Next thing you know, our friend CantankerousProfessorStuccoShoots is going to buy a McMansion in La Jolla with a jumbo loan.

Invoice for new keyboard forthcoming…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-05-12 10:24:37

Nice try. I scored a long gentle kiss from a charming lady. I’m ahead.

 
 
Comment by CincyDad
2010-05-12 06:10:42

Ohio house prices zooming upward…

http://cincinnati.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2010/05/10/daily22.html

YoY increases in median home prices (per NAR):

Cincy: + 14.5%

Other Ohio cities:

“Akron’s median price jumped 90 percent; Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor saw its median price rise 54 percent; Dayton was up 23 percent; and Toledo, 13 percent. Columbus, whose housing market suffered the least in Ohio, saw its median price jump about 6 percent over the year.”

Comment by ragerunner
2010-05-12 08:49:30

To bad the percentage increase in home prices were not accompanied by the same percentages in job growth and reduction in unemployment. I am sure its all very sustainable.

Comment by CincyDad
2010-05-12 10:57:28

Well, when you pay people to buy homes, pesky little things like income become irrelevant.

Notice how the median prices in the cities are actualy down from 2009Q4. So the tax credit seems to have really helped leading up to its intial deadline, but not so much since the extension.

(Ohio doesn’t get a lot of coverage on this blog, so I have to throw in local observations and stories from time-to-time.)

 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-05-12 09:38:56

Not to worry, folks. In my town the median price is up year over year. But if you look you see that prices are up from last year’s overshoot $80/sqft low-end foreclosures, while prices for high-end houses have finally dropped. Many more low-end houses are selling than the high. Hence, median prices have risen. Hold your powder for the fall/winter price plummet.

 
Comment by AdamCO
2010-05-12 14:34:47

been watching the market very closely in Cincinnati. The last weeks in April were complete madness, 200 units on the market every day and 220 pending sales.

Now it is may. Now there are 200 units on the market every day and 50 pending sales. uh oh.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 06:10:50

NYC’s competitor across the pond is considering bank breakups. If NYC banks don’t follow suit, and remain in their current inefficiently gargantuan scale of bailout-worthiness, they may lose market share to competitively rightsized international rivals.

FSA might ‘survive’; Commission to investigate bank break-ups
Author: Katrina Baugh
IFAonline| 12 May 2010 | 10:00

Many advisers will be disappointed this morning the FSA is likely to survive as new Chancellor George Osborne has been forced to water down plans to hand over banking supervision to the Bank of England.

However, it is not all good news for the banking sector as an independent commission will consider breaking up big banks, which combine retail and investment banking arms. It will report back within a year, the Financial Times reports.

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 07:55:31

Isn’t that backward? I thought the banks were mulling a gov’t breakup.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 13:27:11

Mutually Assured Destruction

Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 14:25:48

So we’re looking at 40-year standoff, maybe? Good one.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 06:23:18

Beware of politicians who deal with Gollum.

Whitman’s words put spotlight on deeds

A lucrative Goldman Sachs deal, a Craigslist battle and personal investments raise questions.

In her autobiography, Whitman disavows Wall Street “self-dealing and fraud” and rejects as myth the idea that successful executives must “step on people, stretch the truth … and make heartless decisions based only on the bottom line.” (Paul Sakuma, Associated Press / April 23, 2010)

A lucrative deal that Whitman cut for herself with investment banking giant Goldman Sachs was called “corrupt” by the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee. The partnership she forged between EBay and online rival Craigslist landed in court and is still there; Craigslist has accused EBay of stealing trade secrets and fraudulent advertising. At another company, her dismissal of a subordinate executive resulted in an age-discrimination lawsuit and a secret court settlement.

As an investor, she put millions of dollars into private equity firms with a reputation for callous business practices. Subsidiaries of one of the “distressed asset” firms in which she identifies herself as a limited partner foreclosed on dozens of victims of Hurricane Katrina.

“It’s nice to say if you just behave ethically, you will make profits,” said Meir Statman, a professor of finance at Santa Clara University who focuses on ethics. “If that were true, life would be really easy. But . . . there are tradeoffs. And if you are a politician, you have to account for them.”

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:16:27

Wow. That must be her picture in the dictionary next to “tool.”

 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2010-05-12 06:43:16

Report from the field. Lest you still think they are handing mortgages out to any Tom, Dick or Harry - here’s what I’m experiencing. I settle on Friday. My mortgage company called me last night to tell me they need some documentation from me (even though I applied for the mortgage weeks ago).

I’ve been divorced for 3 years, but never changed my withholding status on my paychecks from married. Because of this, they are requesting two things:

1) A letter from me stating why this says married if I’m not and
2) Proof that I’m not married (divorce decree)

They took it even one step further and said that, to be sure I wasn’t paying alimony, I need to provide my entire divorce settlement document. Not really happy having to involve anything to do with my ex in the single most independent thing I’ve ever done in my life, but I guess my bad for not changing the withholding status (though the IRS doesn’t care).

How dead people got mortgages in the past decade is beyond me.

Comment by DennisN
2010-05-12 08:08:34

For a while the banks were even giving out credit cards to kitties.

 
Comment by nycjoe
2010-05-12 08:56:23

Luck with the purchase. Btw, I’m hitched and had to change my withholding status to SINGLE to possibly avoid owing another pile next year.

 
 
Comment by James
2010-05-12 06:51:32

Hello All,

Well, the family went out for a walk last night and we stopped to take a look at a home for sale.

A modest 3/2 in my fairly shabby hood in the slightly less of a war zone in Harbor gateway was offered at 495,000.

It has some company on the market though. A couple other homes listing at 400k range.

There is one listing under 400k as a short sale. Good luck while the bank ponders the other listings.

Our hood… well… we got multifamily dwellings on several of the major streets, lots of illegals working corners and some legals as well. A good bit of gang graffiti but not much other action. Saw some of the homeboys with their pit bull out on the walk. Wished I had my hand cannon with me. Don’t want my kid to get mauled. Some amount of crime here too.

Would say that incomes are under 75k per household here. So prices are floating around 5-8x income still. Plenty of houses with the do-not-enter stickers on them from the banks but not on the market.

Over a few blocks in Torrance proper, prices are even higher with plenty of 400k+ steals on 2+1 homes. That is in North Torrance snuggled up against crime ridden Gardena, also possibly in the El Camino enclave which has no school funding. Modest 3/2’s next to the railroad track with HOAs are 450K.

As you can imagine, I’m not considering buying for a while yet. Meanwhile we got reports of inflation running at 10% up above.

Comment by Lip
2010-05-12 08:33:36

At least you’re a couple of miles from the ocean.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:18:37

Seriously, CA deserves to go down.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:56:38

From: Go Dog GO! by P.D.Eastman

“Do you like the price of my house?”

“No, No, I do not like the price of your house!”

“Do you want to get in line behind these others to bid on my house?”

“No, I do not want to get in line behind others to make a bid!”

“Do you like my offer for your house?”

“No!, No! I most certainly do not like your offer for my house.”

“Good-bye!”

“Good-Bye…” :-)

 
 
Comment by measton
2010-05-12 07:10:38

DETROIT – The war on vacant houses in Detroit took on new force Tuesday as officials announced plans to demolish about 450 of the most dangerous structures within the next two months, and immediately tore into the first home on the list.

Crews collapsed the chimney of a two-story bungalow in northwest Detroit in a ceremonial start to the $4.5 million project backed by Wayne County and faith-based groups. It’s the latest step in an aggressive effort to rid the city of thousands of vacant homes.

“It’s part of the rebirth we are going through,” County Executive Robert Ficano said, surrounded by other local officials and a dozen religious leaders. “These are havens for drugs and other things.”

Detroit’s mayor wants to tear down 10,000 vacant houses over the next four years and, with them, evict the illegal drug and weapons operations that often move in after residents move out.

Of course those illegal drug and weapons operations will just move to other neighborhoods. Seems like some homeless people could move into these houses??

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-05-12 09:26:13

Wait, I thought they were not making any more land?

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-05-12 10:21:14

Sure and then get a legal aide lawyer to sue the city for getting robbed because the city took the bars off the windows and doors to make it look like a nicer community….

————–
Seems like some homeless people could move into these houses??

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-05-12 13:05:31

“….faith-based groups…”

The NAR? Tea-Partiers?

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-05-12 07:22:12

Worker shortage in a few years? This is going to mean wage inflation.

http://tinyurl.com/32edxyf

“In a study done at Northeastern University earlier this year, Barry Bluestone and Mark Melnik say that in eight years, more than five million jobs may go begging unless there’s a big boost in what’s called the labor force participation rate — the percentage of Americans who seek work. The big driver here is that the numbers of Baby Boomers leaving the work force will exceed the supply of new workers coming from younger generations.”

Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 07:45:01

They’ve been saying this for years, if not decades. The Baby Boomers aren’t going to retire until they are too decrepit to work. And there will always be plenty of illegals and H1-B’s to keep wages down.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:24:26

It’s bull. I’ve been hearing this since the 1980s.

Maybe in another 20 years when most of the boomers finally die off and those door greeter jobs they were forced to take because their pension/retirements were gutted, open up.

And there ARE jobs that go begging today. But you need multiple degrees and certs and be willing to do what it took 5 people to do in the past for half of what it paid just 15 years ago.

And no, I’m not exaggerating.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-05-12 13:12:48

I’ve been hearing this since the 70’s in the aviation business.

First it was “Demand for A&Ps is going to go way up when the WWII guys retire….” Then it was “…the Korean War guys…” Then it was the “…..Vietnam War guys……”

I full expect that 500 years from now, on a moon of Jupiter or some similar hellhole, the guys on the flightline at 0-dark-Thirty are going to be assured that “……demand for skilled intergalactic starship mechanics is going to go way up, when those Romulan-Venusuian Clone War guys retire……”

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 11:09:41

Not to mention that more recessions will also keep labor demand down.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-05-12 20:14:57

You guys been eating too many prunes. Do you plan to retire before age 65? I’m still kicking. I will work until I drop. My sisters are in their 50s, older than me. They will work until they drop.

 
 
 
Comment by salinasron
2010-05-12 09:14:43

Yesterday while driving back from SJ I heard an interview with Roubini hyping his book. I thought I might get insight into where we are heading but got absolutely nothing. In fact, I really wonder if he really has a clue to events to come or has joined the MSM trying not to talk badly of the current fiscal situation.

He said that we would definitely not have a black swan event, but a white swan event (as if he or we know all the precursors to any catastrophic event coming our way.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 09:21:25

He said that we would definitely not have a black swan event

Well…nobody knows whether we’ll have a black swan event…that’s what makes them black swan events :-).

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-05-12 09:58:19

I am holding out for the ultra-rare purple swan. No, an oil-soaked white one does not count.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 10:28:06

While it’s not easy to predict the future of everything, it’s also not hard to know that neglect and greed always leads to disaster or that if you let go of the wheel of your car, you WILL hit the tree.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:49:59

“I really wonder if he really has a clue to events to come or has joined the MSM trying not to talk badly of the current fiscal situation.”

I can’t imagine where he came up with this idea, but I like it.

Bust Up the Banks

The president’s half-measures won’t fix our failed financial system. Here’s what will.

By Nouriel Roubini and Stephen Mihm | NEWSWEEK
Published May 7, 2010
From the magazine issue dated May 17, 2010

In early January, Ben Bernanke defended the Fed’s handling of the recent financial crisis. The lesson he drew was simple: better regulation could have prevented it.

This is correct. Regulation could be better and smarter. Regulators could eliminate banks’ intentional evasion of regulatory oversight. They could solve the too-many-cooks-in-the-kitchen problem, in which an overabundance of regulators and a lack of coordination frustrate effective supervision of the system.

But sometimes it’s not enough to impose new regulations on the status quo; sometimes a bit of regulatory “creative destruction” is in order. Many of President Obama’s reform proposals are good, but they don’t go far enough. There are more drastic changes that can and should be imposed in the coming years, including breaking up big banks and imposing new firewalls in the financial system. There is an even more radical idea: use monetary policy to prevent speculative bubbles.

What follows is a glimpse of the possible future of finance—if policymakers and politicians recognize that confronting crises requires radical reform.

Smaller Is Better

There’s a very simple way to curtail the power of the big firms that helped cause the crisis: break them up. The recent crisis highlighted the “too big to fail” problem. The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the resulting cardiac arrest of the global financial system revealed that many institutions had become so large, leveraged, and interconnected that their collapse could have systemic and catastrophic effects.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 13:16:55

The Buzz
Are big banks dead in the water?

Shares of Morgan Stanley fell on reports of a federal investigation similar to the one that’s plaguing rival Goldman Sachs. By Paul R. La Monica, editor at large May 12, 2010: 1:58 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Like sharks drawn to fresh blood in the water, it seems that federal regulators have a ravenous appetite and they are set to pounce on big banks.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) is now the subject of an investigation over complex mortgage securities, just like Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500). Shares of Morgan Stanley fell more than 3% Wednesday.

This has some wondering if Morgan is the next Goldman. But the scope of that question might be too narrow. A better one is this: Are all the big banks going to come under increased scrutiny from regulators?

It appears this might be the case. Interestingly though, shares of other large banks didn’t get hit on the Morgan news Wednesday. Goldman’s stock was up about 2% — small consolation for investors considering that it’s still down 22% since the SEC charged it with fraud in late April.

But shares of Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) and UBS (UBS) — two banks mentioned in the report about Morgan as also having a role in marketing the mortgage investments in question — were both up Wednesday morning.

Still, even if it turns out that no charges are ever filed against Morgan, it’s clear that the SEC, DOJ and other federal agencies have found religion in going after the big banks.

Many politicians have also been intensely critical of the large financial firms as taxpayers continue to bristle about the bailout of the sector in 2008 and the quick return to profitability enjoyed by many of the banks that were propped up with government support.

The Senate is in the midst of debating a Wall Street reform bill and there are considerable questions about whether a new law may be passed that could have enough teeth in it to put a crimp in the industry’s profits.

“Uncertainty is the biggest cloud. A lot of investors may stay on the sidelines until reform passes and we get that behind us,” said Frank Barkocy, director of research with Mendon Capital Advisors, a Rochester, N.Y.-based investment firm that focuses on financial stocks.

 
 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 11:57:20

Of course it’ll be a white swan event. Lots of countries have defaulted on their debt and/or hyperinflated it away.

In our case, it’ll just be a honkin’ big 5,000-lb white swan.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 13:45:41

With a bad attitude. :lol:

 
 
 
Comment by salinasron
2010-05-12 09:20:31

We print money out of thin air, hold property off the market, bail out foreign nations and our own, don’t create jobs in the private sector, extend EI to where people won’t even take lower level jobs available, and we are still going to come out of this unchaffed.

No, we have opened a new book and a new way of life to which the masses have yet to see.

The feds print money for fed projects, but who will bail out the States, the Counties, the Cities. Where will all that tax money come from?

 
Comment by Hard Rain
2010-05-12 10:16:13

“F&F are one damn sick joke, that will continue to burn untold dollars…

Fannie, Freddie aid cost unclear: regulator

(Reuters) - It is unclear how much U.S. taxpayers will eventually have to shell out to help mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the regulator of the two companies said on Tuesday.

“The actual cost I do not know,” Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco said in response to a question from Kentucky Republican Senator Jim Bunning at a Senate Finance Committee hearing.”

What is truly awe inspiring is the burn rate has only increased. One would like to think the gubberment could quickly to extinguish the fire. Instead, either knowingly or through stupidity (my bet’s on knowingly) have increased the size of the blaze. A pilot program to buy commercial real estate from troubled developers ??? I mean WTF who thinks this crap up:

“Freddie Mac hopes to securitize two CMBS offerings by the end of this year, then the program will be rolled out to the broader network of lenders. “When this thing is completely baked and rolled out broadly, we’re going to be known as the high-quality conduit,” said May.”

http://www.freddiemac.com/multifamily/termsheet_cme.html

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:45:49

“What is truly awe inspiring is the burn rate has only increased.”

Wasn’t burn rate the dot bomb era measure of success?

 
 
Comment by reuven
2010-05-12 10:23:04

I love looking at “urban ruins” websites.

See this abandoned shack, for example?

http://www.forgotten-ny.com/YOU‘D%20NEVER%20BELIEVE/seagirt/15.P4200490.JPG.jpg

(From the excellent website http://www.forgotten-ny.com)

It’s a beachfront bungalow in New York City! Somone once owned it as a summer home. Thought it would be a great investment, probably. After all, they’re not building any more land in New York city, are they?

Now there are hundreds of houses like this, in once upscale Brighton Beach and other areas.

Anyone who doesn’t think house prices can go all the way to $0 is mistaken!

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:48:17

1st link…no good for me. :-(

 
Comment by Reuven
2010-05-12 10:48:21

That link didn’t work. Try this: http://bit.ly/cuDZP2

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 11:19:23

“…At their height, some 100,000 bungalow units turned the peninsula into a seasonal city.”

Me no understand the sit-u-ation? That’s not what happened in Newport Beach, CA…

 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 10:45:23

Filed under: “Boy, they must really love ice hockey in Phoenix” ..or…”…them damn illegals again!” ;-)

“Less heartwarming hockey story: Glendale, Ariz., taxpayers are on the hook for $25 million of the Coyotes’ financial losses for next season if the team is not sold, which keeps the team from fleeing to Winnipeg for now, but at a price.”

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 11:11:53

“whocouldaknowed” that hockey wouldn’t make a lot of money in the southern states?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-05-12 11:20:46

You mean to tell me that the illegals in Arizona aren’t fans of “Los Coyotes”!

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 11:59:09

:-)

Do they charge tax on the beer in their stadium?

 
 
Comment by Lip
2010-05-12 16:07:57

Actually we have a lot of hockey fans, but most root for other teams.

This bailout is a shame but they built this huge commercial development near the Cardinals stadium and they must bring in huge sums of tax money from the sales.

http://westgatecitycenter.com/explore_westgate.php

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 10:51:19

Looks like the Fed’s War on Savers is succeeding wildly!

Full Post
Posted Wednesday, May 12, 2010 9:24 AM
Savings Rate Down as Americans Spend More
Newsweek

Leading Indicator

2.7%
The personal savings rate for Americans in March. The post-crash savings rate peaked at 6.4 percent in May 2009, and hasn’t been below 3 percent since October 2008.

Comment by packman
2010-05-12 12:01:50

Unlike interest rates - the savings rate can (and did) go below zero. That is, until they later shifted it upwards (by a lot).

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 13:07:13

Is that due to an actual change in consumer saving behavior, or a change in accounting method to sweep bad news under the rug?

I am thinking it might be interesting to include not only income and expenditures but also household wealth effect gains and losses in the comparison (e.g. vanishing home equity and stock market portfolio values). I’m guessing the picture might get a lot more negative if these components of permanent income were factored in to the measure?

Comment by packman
2010-05-12 13:23:48

I am thinking it might be interesting to include not only income and expenditures but also household wealth effect gains and losses in the comparison (e.g. vanishing home equity and stock market portfolio values). I’m guessing the picture might get a lot more negative if these components of permanent income were factored in to the measure?

Actually the number would get quite huge, and in fact could go infinite.

E.g. say in -

Year X:
————–
HH income (including equity etc gains) = $50,000 average
Savings = $5,000 average
= 10% savings rate

Year Y (say 2008 - worst of the crash)
——————
HH income = $50 avg ($50,100 salary - $50,050 equity loss)
Savings = $500 average
= 1000% savings rate

As income approaches zero - savings as a percentage of income approaches infinity (though may suddenly jump to negative infinity)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 11:01:25

For those of you who think life is just a matter of making smart investments:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/37103788/ns/today-today_people/

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 11:57:14

Must been really hot down in Georgia that day… :

“In addition, there was talk in the small town because she had mowed her lawn wearing a thong.”

Prosecutors, truth or conviction?…In California, it’s a sure path to career destruction if you have a tendency to…over-charge a suspect.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-05-12 13:30:50

I’m guessing that she would have been the “talk of the town” if she was mowing the yard in a thong, no matter what size of town it was.

Which is what makes me laugh about big city people moving to the country, especially one populated with good ol’ Southern Baptists. The definition of “culture shock”. Especially when they use their bubble market equity to overpay for property out in Bumf##k, and outbid the locals.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-05-12 13:39:11

I’d never thought about one part of “outbidding the locals” factor when it comes to problems that city folks have out in the country. In my little hometown in the sticks, people keep their eye on property for decades. Some idiot comes in and overpays, it’s just that many more years they’re going to have to wait for it. Yeah people are going to be annoyed when you do that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by packman
2010-05-12 14:03:43

Man - that stinks. Good for her for working so hard to clear her name - that took a lot of courage and work. Seems like the prosecutors should foot the $500k bill for her costs though.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-05-12 19:07:30

Doesn’t work that way. What WILL is lawsuit city against the school district and the parents of the other children.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 11:32:43

The End of the Euro

How the crisis in Greece could lead to the demise of Europe’s most ambitious project.

By Niall Ferguson | NEWSWEEK
Published May 7, 2010
From the magazine issue dated May 17, 2010

Crisis—from the Greek “krisis,” for a turning point in a disease—is one of many English words we owe to the ancient Athenians. Now their modern descendants are reminding us what it really means.

Just when it seemed safe to start using the word “recovery,” a Greek crisis is threatening the world economy, and the very existence of the world’s second-biggest currency.
===========================================================
PHOTOS
A History of Greek Protest Dogs

Though there are many weapons available to the street protester, there is perhaps only one for which there is no defense: a really cute friggin’ dog.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
 
Comment by dude
2010-05-12 11:41:25

An old friend sent me this link and asked me to comment, I’ve copied my reply below:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/237631

I generally like Roubini, and he has a very good track record as a forecaster. Two things not mentioned in the article were limits to size of these banks and the leverage they carry. I’ve seen it suggested that they could be limited to 1% of nominal GDP, for example. This would help avoid the “to big to fail” problem, but not if all of them fail together.

This brings up the second point he didn’t cover, which is limits on leverage. The greatest single prognosticator of bank failures has been the level of leverage they carried. It is precisely due to derivatives and CDS that the banks wrongly thought they could carry higher than the traditional 9X leverage.

Now my pesimistic side says there will be no change enacted to avoid another bust. The reason is that any change to actually protect against another bust would precipitate a crash because most firms operate above reasonable reserve requirements and a restriction would cause them to curtail lending drastically and send us into another phase of contraction.

As far as what to do, maybe a sane person or group could propose that we start backing off on the leverage point by point, month by month, until we get to safe levels, but I personally will go forward expecting one “unexpected” crash after another, that no one could have seen coming.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 11:41:43

News from behind “The O.C.” Curtain:

Medical billing transgressions.. no worries, it’s “contained” ;-)

“Justice’s lawyer issued a statement saying Justice is “ashamed and repentant about his billing transgressions.”

BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! (fpss™)

Doctor in fraud case selling Newport mansion:
May 12th, 2010, by Jeff Collins OC Register

“Last week, he put his oceanfront home overlooking Little Corona Beach on the market.

At nearly $21 million, his Corona del Mar home is the 10th-priciest listing in Orange County

Respected oncologist. Cancer center director. USC clinical professor of medicine. President of the Orange County division of the American Cancer Society.

Justice treated victims in the Chernobyl disaster and cared for Vietnamese refugees in Northern California. He spent 10 days treating earthquake victims in Haiti, and planned to return there in June.

That reputation was marred last month, however, when Justice agreed to plead guilty to charges that he defrauded Medicare and other insurers of up to $1 million for injectable cancer medications that never were provided.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 11:41:59

This is rich, the ‘dingle’ Barry is giving economic advise to other countries.

Who’s running Europe? Now Obama pressures Spain over cuts after whispers he advised Merkel on saving the euro.
Mail Foreign Service 12th May 2010

Barack Obama is pressuring Spain to make austerity cuts as the European debt crisis rumbles on, it has emerged.

The U.S. President has also been credited with helping to save the Euro, after giving advice to European leaders on how to handle the debt crisis.

U.S. officials have been adamant that Europe must take the lead in resolving the crisis.

But amid fears for the impact on the American economy, behind closed doors the U.S. has been taking a far more active role.

Mr Obama and his aides have privately pressured European leaders to take bold action to calm the storm in financial markets.

Pressure: U.S. President Barack Obama has called Spanish Prime Minister Jose Zapatero to urge Spain to take ‘resolute action’

Yesterday he called Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero to discuss the importance of ‘resolute action’ by Spain.

Spain’s public finances, along with Portugal’s, have caused the most concern after those of Greece, which secured a European bailout.

The White House said Mr Obama was actively engaged in ensuring that Europe’s debt crisis did not hurt the global economy.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-05-12 11:50:26

And it doesn’t include BB’s printing presses.

May 12 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. reported a budget deficit for April, the second such shortfall since 1983 for the month that typically sees an increase in income tax payments.

The excess of spending over revenue rose to $82.7 billion last month compared with a $20.9 billion gap in April 2009, the Treasury Department said today in Washington. It was the largest April deficit ever and exceeded the median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 13:03:15

Uncle Sam is not the only government entity having trouble balancing the books:

California sees tax receipts plunge

SACRAMENTO
May 7, 2010 12:07pm

The total taxes and fees paid to California plunged in April, according to a report Friday from state Controller John Chiang.

The month’s receipts dropped below the Governor’s 2010-11 budget estimates by $3.6 billion, or 26.4 percent.

Through March, the state’s revenues were tracking more than $2.3 billion ahead of projections.

“Four months of positive receipts were erased in the last 10 days of April,” says Mr. Chiang. “Because a surge in revenues has not come, the Governor and Legislature need to move quickly and forge the consensus needed for a balanced budget. Any delay will only limit their options and expose already struggling Californians to greater harm.”

Year-to-date revenues are now behind estimates by approximately $1.3 billion. Personal income taxes accounted for most of the drop in April, coming in $3.1 billion below projections for the month and $2.2 billion short for the year-to-date.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 11:59:14

Home prices could sink without tax credit ~ USA TODAY

Home prices are widely expected to fall now that a tax credit for home buyers has expired.

That’s raising concern about a possible double dip in home prices.

National housing prices stopped falling early last year and rose 0.3% over the 12 months ending in February, according to a study by real estate analytics firm CoreLogic.

The firm predicts prices will fall this year before starting to rise again in late 2010. Even so, next February’s prices are likely to be 4.2% lower, it forecasts.

“Home prices will struggle for maybe another year,” says Mark Fleming, CoreLogic’s chief economist.

A shrunken pool of buyers due to the tax credit’s expiration is one reason.

“The tax credit is the big reason home prices have been so buoyant, and sales will drop” with its expiration, says Paul Ashworth of Capital Economics. “You will see a double dip in housing prices.”

Another reason is the number of distressed houses — including foreclosures and short sales — that are on the market or that will be in coming months.

Distressed homes, typically sold at discounted prices, accounted for 36% of first-quarter sales, the National Association of Realtors reported Tuesday. The first quarter’s median single-family home price ($166,100) was roughly flat with a year earlier, despite gains in nearly two-thirds of 152 metro areas that the NAR surveys.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 13:00:51

“Home prices could sink without tax credit”

As long as the zombie GSEs are making loans to enable marginally qualified borrowers to purchase homes they can barely afford, I don’t see this happening.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 12:00:25

Ga. Regents approve up to 16 percent tuition hike

Georgia college students will pay up to $1,000 more in tuition in the coming school year under hikes passed by the state Board of Regents on Tuesday, a move that comes amid one of the worst state fiscal crises in recent history.

The tuition increases for the state’s 35 public colleges and universities hit hardest at research universities: Georgia Tech, the University of Georgia and Georgia State University. Many students will pay $3,535 per semester, a 16 percent increase over last fall.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 12:11:34

LET ME SEE IF I GOT THIS RIGHT…

IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.

IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.

IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.

IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.

IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.

IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET:

1 - A JOB,

2 - A DRIVERS LICENSE,

3 - SOCIAL SECURITY CARD,

4 - WELFARE,

5 - FOOD STAMPS,

6 - CREDIT CARDS,

7 - SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,

8 - FREE EDUCATION,

9 - FREE HEALTH CARE,

10 - A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON

11 - BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR LANGUAGE

12 - AND THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY’S FLAG WHILE YOU PROTEST THAT YOU DON’T GET ENOUGH RESPECT IN OUR COUNTRY

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I HAD A FIRM GRASP ON THE SITUATION…

Comment by bink
2010-05-12 12:23:49

Capslock is cruise control for cool.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-05-12 14:26:07

I wonder why those countries are so intolerant?

2006 (First Quarter) INS/FBI Statistical Report on Undocumented Immigrants

CRIME
* 95 % of Warrants in LOS ANGELES are for ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 83 % of Warrants for MURDER in Phoenix Arizona are FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 86 % of Warrants for MURDER in Albuquerque New Mexico are for ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 75 % of those on the most wanted list in Los Angeles, Phoenix, Albuquerque are ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 24.9 % OF ALL INMATES in California detention centers are Mexican Nationals here ILLEGALLY
* 40.1 % of all inmates in Arizona detention centers are Mexican Nationals here ILLEGALLY
* 29 % (630,000) Convicted ILLEGAL ALIENS felons fill our state and federal prisons at the cost of $1.5 Billion Annually
* 53 % Plus of all investigated burglaries reported in California, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona and Texas are perpetrated by ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 50 % Plus of all gang members in Los Angeles are ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 71 % Plus of all apprehended Cars stolen in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California were stolen by ILLEGAL ALIENS or “Transport Coyotes “
* 47 % of cited / stopped Drivers in California have NO License, NO Insurance, and NO Registration for the vehicle of that 47 %, over 92 % were ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 63 % of cited / stopped Drivers in Arizona have NO License, NO Insurance, and NO Registration for the vehicle of that 63 %, over 97 % are ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 66 % of cited / stopped Drivers in New Mexico have NO License, NO Insurance, and NO Registration for the vehicle Of that 66 %, over 98 % were ILLEGAL ALIENS

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 14:51:24

Illegal aliens from Mexico…America’s #1 problem, where’s the National Guard?

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-05-12 12:13:07

Get ready for more street protests.

May 12 (Bloomberg) — Spain’s Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero performed a U-turn and cut public wages, caving in to pressure from the rest of Europe to reduce spending to avoid being dragged deeper into the Greek crisis.

Spain will cut public wages 5 percent this year and freeze them in 2011 while suspending a pension raise, Zapatero told parliament in Madrid today. A 2,500-euro ($3,168) subsidy for new parents will be scrapped and foreign aid trimmed, while public investment will fall 6 billion euros in 2011.

The government, whose members will take a 15 percent pay cut, aims to push the deficit to 6 percent of gross domestic product next year from 11.2 percent in 2009, in what would be the largest two-year reduction since at least 1980. Finance Minister Elena Salgado said as recently as February that Spain would honor wage agreements with public-sector unions.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 12:23:37

Many American Students Entering College Need Remedial Courses

Davie, Fla. (AP) - Professor Derron Bowen teaches high school math to college students, patiently chalking equations on the board on basic arithmetic topics such as the speed of a driver on a a 20-hour trip.

Bowen’s class at Broward College in South Florida is for students who didn’t score high enough on an entrance test to get into college-level math. In all, about two-thirds of students entering the community college need to take at least one remedial course in math, English or reading.

Nationwide, about a third of first-year students in 2007-08 had taken at least one remedial course, according to the U.S. Department of Education. At public two-year colleges, that number rises to about 42 percent.

Education observers worry that the vast numbers of students coming to college unprepared will pose a major roadblock to President Barack Obama’s goal for the United States to once again lead the world in college degrees.

“We don’t get there from here,” said Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education and former governor of West Virginia.

In October, the Education Department reported that many states declare students to have grade-level mastery of reading and math when they do not. In a 2007 ACT National Curriculum Survey of college professors, 65 percent said their states poorly prepare students for college-level coursework.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-05-12 20:58:11

This story begs the question: how did these kids even get accepted in to the school’s curriculum in the first place.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 12:32:15

Canadian Home Swallowed by Sink Hole, 2 Family Members Dead, Dog Alive ~ NewsCore

All four members of a Canadian family were feared dead Tuesday after their farmhouse was swallowed by a massive sinkhole

All four members of a Canadian family were feared dead Tuesday after their farmhouse was swallowed by a massive sinkhole.

Police found the Prefontaine family — father Richard, his wife Line and their two daughters — in the basement of their home, CP24 reported.

Two were confirmed dead after their bodies were removed from the site, while the status of the other two was yet to be confirmed.

Incredibly, the family’s dog was found alive, although weak, after being dragged into the sinkhole.

It is believed all of the family were in the basement when the earth opened up and swallowed their country home on Monday night.

Their home is located in St. Jude, Quebec, approximately 55 miles northeast of Montreal.

Neighbors said the area’s soil is unstable and a similar landslide wiped out a small bridge a few years ago.

The two adults were in their 40s while the daughters were a fourth grader and a high school student, The Globe and Mail reported.

Police moved the security perimeter closer to the scene of the landslide on Tuesday. Surete du Quebec Police spokesman Ronald McInnis said the crater is 500 meters by 100 meters (1,640 feet by 330 feet) wide and 30 meters (98 feet) deep.

Three cars in front of the house were also swept away, as well as a nearby road, the Globe and Mail said. Five other houses in the area were evacuated.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 12:43:58

30 billion was forecast… we hit $83 billion. Go team Barry, if you try really hard perhaps we can hit $100 billion this month!

U.S. April budget deficit $83 billion: Treasury

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The U.S. government ran a $83 billion budget deficit in April, the Treasury Department reported Wednesday. Income was $245.3 billion, the Treasury said, 8% below the total recorded last April. Spending was $328.0 billion, up 14% year-over-year. The deficit in line with a Congressional Budget Office estimate and marked the 19th consecutive monthly budget shortfall. A year ago in April the deficit was $20.9 billion. For the first seven months of the fiscal year, the government incurred a budget deficit of about $800 billion, roughly the same as last year.

Comment by packman
2010-05-12 13:31:58

Dang good thing they include capital gains in the trust funds in that calculation. That hides the fact that the true deficit for April was $175.6 Billion.

3/31 Total Debt: $12,773 Billion
4/30 Total Debt: $12,948 Billion

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-05-12 12:59:12

Funny how when the DJIA rallies, Uncle Buck tends to take it in the shorts. From Bloomberg:

CURRENCY VALUE CHANGE % CHANGE TIME
EUR-USD 1.2624 -0.0039 -0.3048% 15:38
GBP-USD 1.4826 -0.0129 -0.8649% 15:38
USD-CHF 1.1111 -0.0006 -0.0531% 15:38
USD-SEK 7.5574 -0.0534 -0.7020% 15:38
USD-DKK 5.8938 0.0167 0.2836% 15:38
USD-NOK 6.1583 -0.0332 -0.5365% 15:38
USD-CZK 20.1280 -0.0395 -0.1958% 15:38
USD-SKK 23.8640 0.0878 0.3692% 15:38
USD-PLN 3.1294 -0.0507 -1.5941% 15:39
USD-HUF 215.2300 -2.3650 -1.0869% 15:39
USD-RUB 29.9720 -0.1823 -0.6047% 12:59
USD-TRY 1.5230 -0.0131 -0.8528% 15:38
USD-ILS 3.7530 -0.0030 -0.0799% 15:38
USD-KES 77.7500 -0.1500 -0.1926% 10:06
USD-ZAR 7.4756 -0.0410 -0.5448% 15:38
USD-MAD 8.7738 0.0412 0.4712% 15:39

 
Comment by basura
2010-05-12 13:32:10

This is why more and more single women are buying houses:

Class of 2010.

Degrees Male Female Females per 100 Males

Associate’s 37.7 62.3 166
Bachelor’s 42.6 57.4 135
Master’s 39.7 60.3 152
Prpfessional 50.6 49.4 98
Doctor’s 48.4 51.6 107

mjperry.blogspot.com/2010/05/huge-college-degree-gap-for-class-of.html

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 15:46:46

Any like comparisons for Islamic countries?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 13:33:04

I would imagine LA could fire 1700 and never miss them. Here in our little burg in central S.C. we could cut out a third of our shovel leaners and keep right on peculating.

Analyst: 1,700 Layoffs Needed to Close LA Budget Gap
May 11, 2010

The Los Angeles City Council’s chief legislative analyst Tuesday recommended eliminating more than 1,700 positions to help close a projected $492 million deficit in the budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

Councilman Bernard Parks, who chairs the council’s Budget and Finance Committee, said the “bulk” of those positions are currently occupied by city employees who would be issued pink slips unless alternative solutions are found to close the budget gap.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s original plan called for laying off about 750 employees and forcing thousands of others to take up to 26 furlough days.

Parks said those calculations were based on revenue projections that were “too ambitious.”

After adjustments were made by the Budget and Finance Committee, the $492 million deficit in the proposed budget grew by another $93 million.

To compensate, Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller recommended eliminating 1,761 positions.

Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 13:34:28

peculating = percolating

 
Comment by CentralCoastDude
2010-05-12 14:11:36

Finally, cut the fat!!!!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-05-12 13:54:12

San Francisco landmark home for sale.
Address: 201 Buchanan St., Hayes Valley

Asking price: $1.575 million

Description: Built for John Nightingale, an early San Francisco pioneer, this Eastlake-style home was named San Francisco Landmark 47 in 1972. The property, known as the Nightingale House, also was the residence of San Francisco artist Jo Hanson, who died in March 2007.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/12/BU0P1DC9DL.DTL#ixzz0nkbrWjM0

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2010/05/12/BU0P1DC9DL.DTL&object=%2Fc%2Fpictures%2F2010%2F05%2F11%2Fba-walkthrough12_0501654290.jpg

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-05-12 14:58:58

First time I have seen this. I know some on this blog said the April 30 cut off didn`t matter because they would just back date the contract if they could close by June 30. Well here is an active listing from realtor.com that says they can close on/or before 6/30. Why would that matter now if they weren`t going to back date the contract?

Property Information
in short sale process will be able to close on/or before 6/30 opportunity knocking at make an offer we have to get the banks approval on an accepted offer and we only deal with 1 contract 1Buyer until its final conclusion Property Features
•Single Family Property
•Status: Active
•Area: Stuart - South of Indian St
•County: MARTIN
•Year Built: 2000
•3 total bedroom(s)
•2 total bath(s)
•2 total full bath(s)
•Approximately 2044 sq. ft.
•Type: Single Family Detached
•Master bedroom
•Living room
•Dining room
•Kitchen
•Master bedroom is 14×14
•Living room is 23×14
•Dining room is 10×9
•Kitchen is 16×10
•2 covered parking space(s)
•2 car garage
•Attached parking
•Heating features: Electric/Central
•Central air conditioning
•Exterior construction: Concrete block, Concrete/Stucco
•Roofing: Asphalt/Fiberglass
•Approximate lot is 5488 sqft
•Call agent for details on association fee info.

Comment by Kim
2010-05-12 15:26:37

Backdating the contract this late could have serious ramifications. For example, once both parties sign the contract, it initiates the attorney review period (5 days is the standard where I live). If a buyer was to backdate a contract today, their entitlement to attorney review could be wiped out. If the contract allows ten days for inspection, well, today is the 12th, so that right is gone too. Buyers and sellers can and will easily get away with backdating these contracts one or two days past the deadline, but this late in the game might mean the buyer would be playing with fire.

I suppose the buyer could rewrite the purchase agreement to say they could get out at any time and for any reason up to closing - but they’d have to get the seller to agree. You can bet the seller’s agent and attorney don’t want to see that kind of stipulation included.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-05-12 15:15:45

So, if Lil’ Opie (The non-Hawaiian) wins this years “Dicky Boy” Cheney “Paddle Award”, do ya think he’ll present the award in person?

“…Barack Obama warned today that coalition forces in Afghanistan faced months of hard fighting, but said they had started to “reverse the momentum of the insurgency” by taking the fight to the Taliban.”

Lil’ Opie sounds more & more like a Republican from 1863:

“There are many difficult days ahead in Afghanistan. We face a determined and ruthless enemy but we go forward with confidence,” he said.

“We’ve had very frank discussions, and President Karzai agrees with me that we can’t win through a military strategy alone. That we’re going to have to make sure that we have effective governance, capacity building, economic development, in order for us to succeed.”

Hwy’s Authorial intrusion:
President Karzai: “…this includes my friends & family members, right?”

Obama says taking the fight to the Taliban is paying off:
Guardian UK

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-05-12 20:09:51

Reading about a community involved in a development controversy I came across the gem:

““We are not snobs who just don’t want the YMCA here,” she said. “We have real concerns about traffic and noise. We work four jobs to live here because we wanted to live in a nice, quiet neighborhood.””

Four jobs to live in a particular neighborhood! There’s a support to that argument you were making the other day, oxide.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post