Bits Bucket For May 21, 2010
Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. The DC meetup link at the forum is here. Click here for the shadow inventory thread.
Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. The DC meetup link at the forum is here. Click here for the shadow inventory thread.
Guten Abend, meine Freunde.
Financial reform bill passing on a day of fear and trembling for Wall Street is a mega black swan guano bomb dropped on bovines’ heads. Enjoy the long ride to the bottom, bulls!
The Wall Street Journal
Slowdown Fear Hits Market
New worries about the health of the global economy drove U.S. stocks to their first official correction since the bull market began last March, roiling credit markets and causing big swings in currencies.
Decoupling ain’t all that any more.
* ASIA MARKETS
* MAY 21, 2010, 1:43 A.M. ET
Asian Shares Off Early Lows
By SHRI NAVARATNAM and GA-WOON PHILIP VAHN By
SINGAPORE—Asian shares were down Friday, but many markets were off their lows as some investors picked up recently battered shares.
Property stocks in China and banking plays in Australia were recovering, although weak sentiment weighed on technology plays in Tokyo and Taipei.
Sentiment was hit after the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 3.6% on Thursday, its largest percentage drop since March 5, 2009, due to worries about the potential impact of the euro zone debt crisis on global growth.
An electronic board shows share index at a bank in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Friday, May 21, 2010.
“This euro-zone saga is turning into a bad horror movie. You think the monster is dead but it keeps coming back,” said Phillip Securities economist Joshua Tan. “We think something is about to give as Libor-OIS (overnight index swap) spreads continue to widen, signifying that banks are wary of lending to each other.”
Japan’s Nikkei 225 was down 2.5%, but was off an earlier fall of over 3.0%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 was 1.4% lower compared with a morning loss of about 3.2% to a 10-month low. Taiwan’s main index was down 2.4%, and China’s Shanghai Composite Index was down 2.0%.
…
Decoupling. Hmm. I hate to tell you what that used to mean.
Roidy
Less fun than recoupling, I take it?
Far less fun.
Roidy
When decoupling, you have to worry about keeping the excess liquidity contained.
Sounds kind of mechanical, when you put it that way.
I’m guessing we’ll get a bit of a rally tomorrow as the blind optimists act like the EU bailout is a good thing. The answer to too much debt is always more debt.. until it isn’t.
There has never been a better time to buy the dip.
No chance of a rally tomorrow. It’s the weekend, remember?
Check the date of the post.
If short selling is “evil,” how about selling short while naked? Go, Germany!
* The Wall Street Journal
* AGENDA
* MAY 21, 2010
Germany Pushes the Issue Too Far
By BILL JAMIESON
Is it a tell-tale sign of German weakness—or a smash-and-grab attack on the future of the euro zone that could transform the dynamic of the European Union?
As the turmoil in European markets continued to feed a vicious chain reaction across the world Thursday, investors were still struggling to come to terms with the unilateral move by Germany to ban “naked shorting” —the practice of selling currencies and stocks not already borrowed or owned.
The ban, extending across euro-zone government bonds and shares in ten key German financial institutions, was brought in without consultation with Germany’s euro-zone partners.
The high-handedness of the German action as much as its futility—it can easily be flaunted by simply moving the transaction to another European financial center—has unsettled investors, underlining worries over the future of collective or coordinated actions to defuse the debt crisis.
“Sentiment is awful and confidence has been trashed,” said David Buik, markets analyst at BGC Partners yesterday.
…
Without the Merkley-Levin amendment the reform bill is a complete and utter farce. After exposing the conflicts of interests during the hearings, they decided to ignore them.
In Crony Capitalist American, conflict of interest is a “good thing!”
So agree. This bill is a piece of cr*p. Wall street and the banks own our government. More to come.
Obama has proven to be everything he campaigned against. Sickening.
I am SO in tune with this guy’s view!
Luckily, I have some chess playing experience under my belt already.
* ROI
* MAY 19, 2010, 9:22 A.M. ET
Klarman: Why Investing Is Like Chess
The deluge of government intervention has thrown a new level of complexity into the system. Anyone rushing to buy more shares or high-yield bonds should think twice, argues Baupost’s Seth Klarman.
The Wall Street Journal
* By BRETT ARENDS
Investing, says Seth Klarman, used to be like checkers. Now it’s like chess–a lot more complicated.
Mr. Klarman runs Baupost Group, a Boston-based investment firm with about $22 billion under management. For the uninitiated, he’s a conservative value investor and one of the most highly regarded in the market. He doesn’t share his market insights that often, so when he does it’s worth listening. Tuesday morning he spoke at a conference for financial industry professionals at the CFA Institute in Boston, in a session hosted by my colleague Jason Zweig.
On the issue of checkers or chess, Mr. Klarman said he was trying to illustrate the way successful investing today involves complicating new factors and dimensions.
In particular, he is looking at the deluge of government interventions to prop up the financial system in the past couple of years and what those may mean down the road. And he is talking about the danger–not a certainty, merely a danger–that governments around the world will trash their currencies in a continuous free-for-all of “handouts and no taxes.” The near-$1 trillion bailout in Europe is just the latest worry.
Where does this leave the ordinary investor?
Anyone rushing to throw more money into shares or high-yield bonds today should think twice. And anyone with a lot invested, especially if they are risk averse, might want to think about taking some chips off the table. Mr. Klarman warns that asset prices have risen too far, too fast, and returns from these levels may be poor. “Given the recent run-up, I would worry that we will have another 10 to 12 years of zero or nearly zero returns,” he said. His firm is holding a remarkable 30% of its assets in cash.
On high-yield bonds, Mr. Klarman’s group found terrific bargains during the financial crisis but that window has long since closed. “The rally’s been indiscriminate,” he said. “On the credit [i.e. bond] side it’s been overblown. Things are now being priced for almost perfection.” (In other words, the prices are already assuming rosy future scenarios. If things get worse investors will be in trouble.)
Most investors, Mr. Klarman warns, have rushed to embrace risk again as if the financial crisis never happened. “The lessons haven’t been learned,” he said. “People are back drinking the Kool-Aid again. It’s very troubling.” By keeping interest rates low and juicing stock markets with liquidity, the government is basically pushing people to speculate, he said. If there were another serious collapse, he said, many investors would be caught out–again.
On the macroeconomic outlook, Mr. Klarman is remarkably gloomy–even by the usual standards of conservative value managers. “I’m more worried about the world, broadly, than I have ever been in my career,” he says. Governments are spending, borrowing and printing money far too freely. Whereas the Great Depression generation learned to live within their means, the Great Recession generation is taking the easy way out, he says. The Greek bailout is just the latest example. Inflation looks like the easy way out. “It’s not clear that any currency is all that trustworthy,” he says. “I worry about paper currencies.”
He goes further, mistrusting some official data and actions. “We don’t know the extent to which we have been manipulated,” he says. He believes the official figures–particularly on inflation–are suspect. “We are being lied to.”
…
“His firm is holding a remarkable 30% of its assets in cash.”
My kind of guy.
A problem cash-rich money managers face is convincing clients they should turn over to them their hard-earned money so they can keep a large chunk of it in cash, something the clients can do on their own without paying out hefty fees.
Hence money managers are forced to chase returns even when it is apparant the risk/reward ratio for doing so is unfavorable.
Yep. It’s a catch 22.
And FWIW - this principle IMO has actually been what’s largely caused the stock market bubble of the past 25 years. Many more people are putting their money into 401k’s now, and in equities, rather than in pensions. As a result of people wanting more direct control of their money - they’re less willing to put them into really safe investments like money markets, CD’s, and bonds (many of them anyhow) - they put them into equities. This actually caused equities to go up a lot more than they otherwise would have.
“Yep. It’s a catch 22.”
- It’s a conundrum.
- It’s why I talked Dad into selling all his stocks, firing his investment manager, and parking his money in cash back in spring 2007.
Yet I keep hearing that too many employees put their 401k money in overly safe investments like moneymarket.
In Montana,
And many have been there since the Spring of ‘07 as well?
Here’s the real problem. The Street can monitor these predictable inflows from Vangard, Fidelity etc. and all it does is create the perfect “foil” for the hedge funds to play ‘off’ of.
What needs to happen ( if we’re serious about leveling the playing field ) is to have the employees contributions *also* be managed in HF fashion where the mgrs. can sit in cash, buy IPO’s and even short the market etc.
What’s good for the goose! Nice call btw Prof. Bear.
Its always been a bit of an irritation to me that in most if not all 401-K plans the only “cash” option one has is the money market fund, which even in normal times might yield 1%. I’ve asked several companies to have an option of a 3 or 5 year FDIC insured CD available as a 401-K choice, but apparently it cannot be done. So, as a participant, if you are under 55, you have to either be in an equity fund, a bond fund or in Money Markets that are guaranteed to lose to inflation.
Back when CD’s paid real rates of return, that would have been a great alterative to either equities or fixed income funds, particularly over the last 12 years.
“Anyone rushing to buy more shares or high-yield bonds should think twice, argues Baupost’s Seth Klarman.”
Anyone rushing to buy investment housing should just stop thinking.
Anyone rushing to buy investment housing should just stop thinking.
TWEET - penalty for false assumption.
They weren’t thinking in the first place.
15 yards and loss of down.
Thanks for the assist; I don’t think all that clearly myself at 5:19a, but nonetheless, the thought of investing in falling knife RE never, ever enters my mind.
Some guy on CNBC put 20% of his investment portfolio into “coastal CA real estate” because “it has bottomed.” People like him, IMO, are the reason there’s been a bump in home sales and prices. Investors are rushing into real estate right now. I see anecdotal evidence everywhere I look. I think we’re on the precipice of the next leg down, where a lot of these investors get wiped out.
“The underlying problem is the collapse of the KeynesianRandian policy bubble . The government spending blowout of the last twofinancial regulations blowout of the last thirty years… ”
There! Translated it from Murdoch-talk to English.
As predicted, a similar panic is following in the wake of the Eurozone bailout to the one which followed the TARP. Enjoy the roller coaster ride which accompanies the evaporation of irrational exuberance!
Lucking for housing investors, Wall Street and the housing market are decoupled.
* The Wall Street Journal
* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* MAY 21, 2010
The Fear Returns
Europe’s policy panic is feeding another financial panic.
Anyone who thought that last week’s IMF-EU bailout would calm markets has had a rude awakening this week, especially after yesterday’s global selloff in stocks. It rarely gets uglier than a 3.6% one-day fall in the Dow and 4.1% on the Nasdaq.
Even more ominous is the return of fear in the credit markets, with interbank risk spreads hitting their widest levels since spring 2009. Investors are fleeing riskier assets and moving back to the relative safety of the dollar and U.S. Treasurys, which means less credit available to finance business and risk-taking. The plunge of the euro has exacerbated this flight to the greenback, and the rapid exchange-rate movements of recent weeks are always more disruptive to investment decisions and capital flows than conventional economic wisdom cares to admit.
Feeding the financial panic is the policy panic, especially in Europe. Instead of keeping cool, political leaders are restricting short sales, banning hedge funds, and proposing to raise taxes on any euro that moves somewhere that politicians don’t like. All of this only speeds the flight out of euro assets. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble should try not speaking for a day, and see if the euro rises.
With demand for dollars increasing, the U.S. Federal Reserve will have to keep providing liquidity to prevent even greater market overshooting. The European Central Bank will face greater pressure both to follow the Fed to near-zero percent interest rates and to stop sterilizing its purchases of euro zone bonds, thus expanding the money supply. These are risky steps for the ECB’s independence and credibility, but the central bank may not be able to resist if this euro panic grows.
The underlying problem is the collapse of the Keynesian policy bubble. The government spending blowout of the last two years has now turned into a sovereign debt rout, starting in Europe and ending who knows where. The IMF wizards who were urging more and more “stimulus” spending through last year have done a 180 and are now frantically advising tax increases and spending cuts—i.e., more austerity, rather than tax cuts or other pro-growth reforms.
We’ve been optimistic that the U.S. recovery could withstand this European panic, but markets are telling us to prepare for heavier weather.
…
LoopNet: Denver-area Q1 commercial real estate sales down 47% from 2009
Denver Business Journal
Denver-area commercial real estate sales for the first quarter were down 47 percent by dollar volume compared to the same period of 2009, according to a report Thursday from LoopNet Inc.
Selling price per square foot, by product type, dropped 27 percent year over year for office buildings and down 13 percent for industrial buildings, but was up 80 percent for retail buildings and up 7 percent for apartment properties.
Our local “lifestyle center”, “The Promenades at Centerra” (a fancy outdoor mall) has been in foreclosure for months now and they keep postponing the auction, as there are no interested parties. Same thing happened with a fancy mall in Ornage County (Anaheim Gardenwalk).
I think you should buy it and stage zombie movie reenactments ever weekend. Or, Blues Brothers!
Brilliant!
Why can’t it be both? Then you can have Belushi reprise his role!
Leading Index in U.S. Unexpectedly Dropped in April (Update2)
Bloomberg) — The index of U.S. leading economic indicators unexpectedly declined in April, a sign the economic expansion may slow in the second half of the year.
The 0.1 percent decrease in the New York-based Conference Board’s measure of the outlook for three to six months followed a revised 1.3 percent gain in March. It was the first decline for the index in a year.
There’s that “unexpectedly” again…
By the way, I want to apologize for the stock market swoon. I made a small change from cash to a fund a couple of weeks ago, and the very next day, the markets started their latest swan dive (turkey dive might be a better word). Next time I’m pondering something like that, Ill let you guys know, and you can do the exact opposite …
Are *you* the fat finger guy?!
No, he’s the guy with the stop/loss order…
I understand the fat finger guy messed up the stop-loss order guys pretty good.
Yesterday’s market swerve: fat fingers, glitch, or cyber-warfare?
Interview by Paul Smalera, senior editorMay 8, 2010: 8:29 AM ET
…
What happened yesterday?
There are two points to understand. First, what catalyzed the activity? What was the reason for the market wanting to fall? It might be that the catalyst was of such size that it overwhelmed all other factors. There are three plausible theories:
1) The fat finger. Plausible, but unlikely. Typing in billions with a “b” versus millions with an “m” seems impossible. Trading systems don’t work that way. More likely, the trading system accepts the sell/buy amount in thousands. Some trader in the heat of the moment forgets it’s in thousands, types in an order for 16,000,000 instead of 16,000. That kind of thing seems far more plausible.
But even then: why on Earth would the trading entry system not have a sanity check? For almost no one in the world is a $16 billion sell order okay to send out as soon as it’s entered. The trader should be fired, along with everyone in the IT department. If this happened, most likely, it was something along those lines. If it wasn’t all one order, maybe it was meant to sell just $1 billion shares but was sent 3 or 5 times instead of once.
…
As a side point: traders have stop loss levels; one big move triggers other moves. There are systematic, discretionary, and plain-old panic trades.
But for all of those styles and programs, once they see the stock market fall 6%, a liquidation effect takes hold. That’s just a function of people. Someone screams fire, and if enough people start running, everyone will. Those are the dynamics of computer software, people, animals, fires, whatever. It’s how we work. That kind of stampeding effect could easily be part of the response.
But the speed of the market falling down, going back up, and partway back down again? If this was really a stampede, why not repeat the 1987 crash [which kept going]? Nothing ’stopped’ this crash except that the catalyst seemed to have ended.
If it was an error or a software bug, it stopped. If it was a hack, the hackers left. In other words, the enabling side of this drop is totally irrelevant [to the catalyst]. The only interesting thing here is the catalyst. If this was a gas pedal that was stuck, it would’ve looked differently, kept going.
Whether this was intentional or unintentional, it happened all at once. If it was an intentional [attack], then the question is, was it a demonstration, a test, or the attack itself? Whatever it was, we didn’t stop it. It stopped itself.
Huh, that wasn’t my finger.
Roidy
The only finger I give the market is my mildde one.
“The index of U.S. leading economic indicators unexpectedly declined in April, a sign the economic expansion may slow in the second half of the year.”
I guess “unexpectedly” is a term to calm the sheeple before sheering. Most of the TARP funding should be out of the market and the banks probably moved into shorting the VIX.
The ‘Black Swan’ event will be when the governments around the world can’t control PM pricing. Pulling that money out of circulation and hoarding it in PM’s would create a big problem.
‘I guess “unexpectedly” is a term to calm the sheeple before sheering.’
Here I had thought it was a blanket cover-up for economic forecasting ineptitude.
Because “we had no idea this was comming, ’cause we really don’t know what we’re doing.” is always reassuring.
I’m still batting 1000!
The NAR will be howling over this, how dare they ask a person to show proof of income. How will real-a-tors be able to sell houses to illegal aliens, and other under the table workers.
Congress aims to put some discipline in lending
With sweeping bank bill, Congress seeks to end ‘too big to fail’ and ‘too good to be true’ ~ May 21, 2010
WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress is getting tougher on both borrowers and lenders blamed for inflating a housing bubble that, when it popped, plunged the nation into a severe recession two years ago.
Under sweeping financial overhauls that have now passed the House and Senate, home buyers won’t be able to get a mortgage without producing pay stubs or other evidence they can make their monthly payments. A new consumer watchdog will police lenders who offer impossible-to-resist subprime mortgages and then jack up the interest rates to impossible-to-pay levels.
“…how dare they ask a person to show proof of income.”
OMG — that is just about as audacious as asking someone crossing over the Mexico border into Arizona to show their immigration papers!
Have you ever wondered why Holder and Napolitano admit to not having read Arizona’s 16-page bill? It’s because if they said they had read it then the next question would have been, “Well, which section of the bill is unconstitutional and why?” They’d have had no answer for that.
I’ve read it and have had to argue the same thing to many others.
There is NOTHING unconstitutional in it. If there was, I’d be the first to howl about it.
Outrageous!
We discussed this on the PDX blog and believe it or not there’s still plenty of people out there that believe it’s none of their realtor’s business what their credit looks like!
In times passed, it was the realtor’s primary function to ensure you were PRE-qualified before even letting you in his car. This very re-structuring of the buyer’s behavior accounts for a good 25% of the bubble. Way to go NAR!
IMHO it’s not the realtor’s job, it’s the loan officer’s job.
bink,
It’s a step in the right direction! ( To hear ’some’ people talk, you’d have thought it was Hank Paulsen’s job? )
I mean, obviously we were talking about a LOT of money, both individually and collectively, what was wrong with creating as many “check points” as possible?
IMHO it’s not the realtor’s job, it’s the loan officer’s job.
Of course the loan officer actually does the pre-approval.
But any realtor worth his/her salt will prompt you get get pre-approval, since it’s a big plus when making an offer.
It’s reasonable for a realtor to refuse to accept someone as a client who doesn’t want to get pre-approval, since there’s a better chance they just won’t get paid by that client otherwise; though they may lose out on some business that way - clients who don’t want to get preapproval for one reason or another.
I remember maybe 10 or so years ago being approached by a neighbor, who was also a realtwhore, about buying in the 92646. She asked why we rented and we said we didn’t have any money. End of conversation. That’s how it used to be. That’s how it should be. It prevents all the shenanigans- the subprime loans, the walking away, everything. Once you have skin in the game, you wanna make sure you’re not going to lose. Years later, she explained how there were ways around the whole down payment thingy, but we didn’t care. At that point, houses were too expensive and we weren’t interested in buying crappy metal beam and sheet rock construction for nearly a million dollars. But lots of other people were, evidently. They are all still hobbling along, driving their Escalades and Navigators and pretending they have a pot to piss in. It’s amazing the lengths that people will go to to feign the appearance of wealth.
That was back when realtors wouldn’t want to waste anyone’s time (or their gas money) showing homes to people who couldn’t qualify. Now they throw anything up at the wall to see what sticks.
I just cannot believe I’m writing this, but I’m in agreement with Pelosi’s Congress for the first time. Make documentation mandatory for all loans.
Yes, this is going to drive the house prices down. But as ComboTechie said over and over “cash is king!”
The 0.04% yield of VMMXX is better than the appreciation of Phoenix houses!
Padded Pensions Add to New York Fiscal Woes ~ The New York Times
In Yonkers, more than 100 retired police officers and firefighters are collecting pensions greater than their pay when they were working. One of the youngest, Hugo Tassone, retired at 44 with a base pay of about $74,000 a year. His pension is now $101,333 a year.
Edward A. Stolzenberg collects $222,143 a year, one of the biggest New York State pensions.
WORKING OVERTIME Yonkers has arranged for its police officers to put in overtime as flagmen on Consolidated Edison construction sites. Though a company is paying the bill, Yonkers is reporting the work as city overtime to the New York State pension fund, thereby increasing future payouts.
It’s what the system promised, said Mr. Tassone, now 47, adding that he did nothing wrong by adding lots of overtime to his base pay shortly before retiring. “I don’t understand how the working guy that held up their end of the bargain became the problem,” he said.
Despite a pension investigation by the New York attorney general, an audit concluding that some police officers in the city broke overtime rules to increase their payouts and the mayor’s statements that future pensions should be based on regular pay, not overtime, these practices persist in Yonkers.
The city has even arranged for its police to put in overtime as flagmen on Consolidated Edison construction sites. Though a company is paying the bill, the city is actually reporting the work as city overtime to the New York State pension fund, padding future payouts — an arrangement at odds with the spirit of public employment, if not the law.
At least the feds aren’t prone to this particular stupidity, ’cause overtime counts not one dime towards retirement.
I heard retirement was changing for some new govt employees - no defined benefit, just 401k and thrift plans. Anyone else hear this?
I predict future public employees will be paid the minimum wage, and all people people just out of prison who sit around smoking dope.
Meanwhile, taxes will double to pay for their predecessors. We can’t take anything back from them, can we?
WT Economist,
LOL. Hasn’t the time come to dash the moniker that “by paying our public employees well, it creates an environment where it basically forces the private sector to pay as well or better?”
Can we drop that now. It obviously hasn’t played out that way in the slightest and was only a smokescreen to bulk up public wages in the meantime. We really need to let that go. Sorry.
You pay min wage, you get min wage results.
I don’t see a problem paying public employees well, if their job requires a certain level of expertise or education. But a mailman or a crossing guard or a ditch digger? No. They should make minimum wage.
ecofeco,
That’s the very mindset that led us here. Gov. employees ( contrary to popular portrayal ) aren’t stupid. Once they reached a point where they easily surpassed their pvt. sector counterparts, there was no turning back.
It took away all of the incentive to really stand out at all, I mean why bother? This ‘is’ the end of the rainbow. It drops the whole pretense of leaving after a few years to seek greener pastures.
I’m not picking on them ( my daughter ‘is’ one ) but if you lived here in OR it would be Oh… so much more apparent.
Instead of picking on civil servants (and age old pastime BTW) why aren’t you arguing for better wages in the private sector?
And if you’re arguing for a more economically efficient government, just remember that private federal contractor employees OUTNUMBER full time federal employees. And that the REAL waste in local government spending is for political favor/BIL contracts/jobs.
As for min wage, the true min wage, according to Toms’ Inflation Calculator, should be $9.15hr. (based on $3.10hr in 1980) Anybody here tried living on less than $12hr lately? I dare you.
Sorry. Missed the “…not picking on them…”
Poor choice of words on my part.
The private sector is constrained by the absolute requirement to make a reasonable return on investment. Unfortuantely, for most businesses, labor is the single largest managable cost the business has. Therefore the business is forced to pay the least it can to get the quality of worker it deems necessary to do the job.
The public sector is under no such constraints. It has almost unlimited capacity to raise taxes or divert money from other needs to pay its employees above market compensation.
I hadn’t heard anything. The current defined benefit pension for feds hired since ~1985 is basicly 1% (1.1% if you’re 62 or older) x the average of your highest three years of salary x your years of service. So if you worked for 35 years you’d get about 35% (38.5% if you’r 62 or older) of your salary. Of course it’s actually a bit more complicated, especially when calculating when you’re eligible to retire, but that’s the gist of it. Which is pretty nice, but for most of us not enough to live on by itself.
nb the thrift plan IS the 401k equivalant. It provides a maximum match of 5% of income. Which is certainly nice in this day and age.
Only an idiot would argue that the federal government doen’t provide good retirement benefits, because they’re quite nice. They’re not quite as gold plated as some think that they are, but they are nice, and expensive to provide. Cutting back to a defined contribution only plan sounds like the sort of political theater that has little chance of passage in the near term, but if we have a “lost decade” or so like the Japanese, that could very well happen.
I heard retirement was changing for some new govt employees - no defined benefit, just 401k and thrift plans. Anyone else hear this?
Do you mean Federal employees?
Because 401ks have been the norm in my town for years now. Only The Cops and Firefighters here get pensions (it pays to have a good union).
As I’ve said before, NYC, LA, Chicago, etc. usually represent only the extreme examples.
Most civil servants I know are not making fat bank.
Hence, why you need to make sure that Barry doesn’t bail them out.
The other thing is the unlimited medical benefit. You have to look askew at removing any cost penalty.
Idaho Homeowners may Face Higher Property Taxes
School districts across the Treasure Valley are desperate to cover the funding lost in this year’s budget cuts.
Now many homeowners may find that even though their home values are dropping their property tax may go up.
The Ada County Assessor said home values are expected to fall by $2-billion dollars this year and if it continues to drop the Meridian School district said they will have no choice but to ask voters to increase property taxes for the first time in 15-years.
School districts rely on property taxes to build new schools, maintain buildings, and make big capital purchases like school buses. But as home values continue to plummet schools are seeing a huge loss in funding.
“Last year the market value in the state of Idaho went down by $7-billion dollars in total. $2-billion of that was in our school district,” said Meridian School District spokesman Eric Exline.
“Now many homeowners may find that even though their home values are dropping their property tax may go up.”
But, but, but, where are the “silver lining” stories now? Whoa is the houseowner who thought their tax liability would go down along with prices. Did they think their schools would close? Their firemen work for free? Their local pols suddenly turn honest?
Well in real bubble areas, people are discovering that vacant, investor-owned houses don’t add many students to the rolls.
Not necessarily, those families had to go somewhere, what if they rent now? With the rental market having its own issuses they may be getting lower rents and the landlords will feel the pinch. Bottom line: there are x households with public school students, and there are now x-y households paying property tax.
It’s not that people moved somwehere else, but that the people to move into these homes never really existed, just Casey Serins and other flippers. In many bubble areas we simply have more housing than people to fill it. In many of them, schools and stripmalls and other infrastructure was built on the assumption that people would actually move into those houses. If an area has a vacency rate somewhere north of 20% that is a lot of less full classrooms, and less foot traffic at the strip malls.
Jim A,
Exactly what happened in Elk Grove. They built a new high school (or junior high school, can’t remember which) based on the houses that were sold. Most of those houses were flippers.
Woe indeed.
This tactic seems to be trending in one nationwide direction — with particularly virulent future tax trendlines in places such as our beloved Cook County.
Now That Is One SERIOUSLY Hyperbolic Alert On CNBC
Joe Weisenthal
According to CNBC, the “FATE OF FREE WORLD HANGS ON VOTE IN GERMAN PARLIAMENT.”
That would be the vote tomorrow to officially approve Eurotarp.
That’s intense.
Sounds to me like Megabank, Inc is pulling a PR stunt to pin the blame for the consequences of their ongoing piracy operation on the German government.
Of course.
More like the “Fate of the Fiat World”.
Free world = PTB status quo
Their fate is your fate, or so they want you to think.
According to CNBC, the “FATE OF FREE WORLD HANGS ON VOTE IN GERMAN PARLIAMENT.”
Nothing says “house of cards” like the ability to knock it down with just one slight breeze.
If it truly is a house of cards - maybe it’s time for it to fall, so that we can build a house of brick to replace it.
In the long run, Keynes’ theory is dead.
JMK, RIP.
* The Wall Street Journal
* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* MAY 21, 2010
The Fear Returns
Europe’s policy panic is feeding another financial panic.
Anyone who thought that last week’s IMF-EU bailout would calm markets has had a rude awakening this week, especially after yesterday’s global selloff in stocks. It rarely gets uglier than a 3.6% one-day fall in the Dow and 4.1% on the Nasdaq.
Even more ominous is the return of fear in the credit markets, with interbank risk spreads hitting their widest levels since spring 2009. Investors are fleeing riskier assets and moving back to the relative safety of the dollar and U.S. Treasurys, which means less credit available to finance business and risk-taking. The plunge of the euro has exacerbated this flight to the greenback, and the rapid exchange-rate movements of recent weeks are always more disruptive to investment decisions and capital flows than conventional economic wisdom cares to admit.
Feeding the financial panic is the policy panic, especially in Europe. Instead of keeping cool, political leaders are restricting short sales, banning hedge funds, and proposing to raise taxes on any euro that moves somewhere that politicians don’t like. All of this only speeds the flight out of euro assets. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble should try not speaking for a day, and see if the euro rises.
With demand for dollars increasing, the U.S. Federal Reserve will have to keep providing liquidity to prevent even greater market overshooting. The European Central Bank will face greater pressure both to follow the Fed to near-zero percent interest rates and to stop sterilizing its purchases of euro zone bonds, thus expanding the money supply. These are risky steps for the ECB’s independence and credibility, but the central bank may not be able to resist if this euro panic grows.
The underlying problem is the collapse of the Keynesian policy bubble. The government spending blowout of the last two years has now turned into a sovereign debt rout, starting in Europe and ending who knows where. The IMF wizards who were urging more and more “stimulus” spending through last year have done a 180 and are now frantically advising tax increases and spending cuts—i.e., more austerity, rather than tax cuts or other pro-growth reforms.
We’ve been optimistic that the U.S. recovery could withstand this European panic, but markets are telling us to prepare for heavier weather.
“Unexpectedly” heavier weather.
~Clipped from Martin Weiss~ 5-20-10
The Dow’s 1000-point “flash crash” of two weeks ago was NOT a fluke! Nor is today’s 376-point slide in the Dow!
These events are lightning bolts that strike deep into the market’s core
These signals all confirm what we’ve been telling you for the last 60 days:
1. The great rally since March of 2009 is — or will soon be — over.
2. Despite its impressive duration and magnitude, that rally was little more than a temporary interlude — an intermission between two phases of a greater bear market.
3. The first phase came in the wake of the great Housing and Debt Crisis of 2008-2009, wiping out as much as HALF of America’s stock values.
4. The second phase has struck with the Great Sovereign Debt Crisis of 2010, and it’s just now getting under way.
Maybe someone leaked out the news that the Senate’s version of financial reform was “worse than expected” for the Street?
CIBT,
Exactly, after all ‘any’ regulation would be viewed as an infringement.
Goldman Sacked; I am thinking there might be a great opportunity to buy the dip just ahead (in six months or so)…
* The Wall Street Journal
* POLITICS
* MAY 21, 2010, 7:04 A.M. ET
Wall Street Firms Brace for Seismic Changes
By RANDALL SMITH
The Senate version of financial regulation hits Wall Street harder than expected, with some analysts estimating it could cut the profits of major financial institutions by roughly 20%.
Critics of a comparable bill that passed the House in December said the Senate version has fewer escape routes and exceptions that leave room for Wall Street firms to work around new restrictions on their riskiest activities.
The Wall Street bull. Some skeptics weren’t convinced the bill would seriously hurt financial firms.
Adam White, a derivatives analyst at White Knight Research & Trading in Atlanta, said it is “miraculous” that the Senate proposals are “stronger than the House and not weaker.”
Some skeptics aren’t convinced that even the toughened bill will seriously hurt Wall Street.
“The lobbyists are firmly in control of Washington, and the reform efforts are likely to be modest,” said Jim Hardesty, president of Hardesty Capital Management LLC in Baltimore. Wall Street firms “can reinvent themselves, and they’ve proved remarkably adaptive over many market cycles.”
The tide shifted after Congress pushed through a White House health-care plan in March over objections from Republicans, emboldening Democrats to follow a similar course for Wall Street. Adding impetus were fraud charges brought last month by securities regulators against powerful Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
The most important set of changes relate to derivatives, which are contracts with prices tied to other market instruments. While the House bill required some derivatives to be cleared to reduce the risk of nonpayment, the Senate version could force Wall Street firms to keep derivatives separate from their bank units—or even spin them off entirely.
Clearing requires both parties to a trade to post collateral with a central clearinghouse to ensure that each side can absorb losses.
Guy Moszkowski, an analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch who follows banks and securities firms, estimates that derivatives account for half of all trading revenue at the biggest firms. At J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., the second-largest U.S. bank in assets behind Bank of America Corp., derivatives generate an estimated 8% of the company’s total revenue.
The legislation could cut derivatives-related revenue by 30% to 50%, according to Mr. Moszkowski. Had that occurred in this year’s first quarter without any offsetting declines in fixed expenses or capital, per-share earnings at J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would have been at least 16% smaller than what the three companies reported. Citigroup Inc.’s profit per share would have shrunk by 7%.
Goldman analysts recently tried to quantify the impact of the changes likeliest to survive, including already adopted caps on fees for checking accounts and credit cards, as well as restrictions in the Senate bill on proprietary trading with the banks’ own money and the House curbs on derivatives. Those elements alone could shave 17% off bank earnings, Goldman said. Less-likely changes could boost the hit to 23%.
…
You will probably post this somewhere but Goldman got busted up in the later 30s for their antic around the great depression. There is a NYT article link on yahoo finance.
Anyhow, takes a few years of incumbents getting thrown out for legislation to get through. Then you have to get the legislation right.
We have another decade to wait.
Anyone who follows Gollum’s dumb money losing suggestions is a maroon.
And John Paulson’s brazillion dollar win on shitty mortgage assets looks more and more like a fraudulently rigged short bet than reflective of any kind of market knowledge. At this point, it looks like his brain is more bovine than ursine in nature.
* The Wall Street Journal
* BUSINESS
* MAY 21, 2010
Pro-Growth Collapse Pounds Markets
Unwinding of Risky, Highly Leveraged Investments Sends Dow Down 376.36; Oil, Dollar Join Plunge
By SUSAN PULLIAM And MARK GONGLOFF
A financial professional gestures on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in the middle of a global selloff Thursday.
The dramatic unwinding of a highly leveraged trading strategy embraced by hedge funds contributed to the global market selloff on Thursday.
The strategy, known as the pro-growth trade, was based on a view that global economies would recover strongly and included bets that commodities, high-yielding currencies and stocks would keep rising, while safer investments such as Treasurys would fall.
The Greek debt crisis and efforts by governments in Asia and Australia to rein in growth have undone the trade in recent weeks and the big moves in the currencies and commodities on Thursday were likely driven by investors selling their holdings to limit their losses.
The stock market reacted to the moves in other markets with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 376.36 points, or 3.6%, to 10068.01, its worst day since March 2009, just before it hit a 12-year low. The market, which had its lowest close since Feb. 10, is down just over 10% from its recent peak in late April, marking its first correction since the powerful bull market began last March.
“The markets are telling you the growth trade is over,” says Michael Novogratz, who oversees macro hedge funds at Fortress Investment Group. In recent days, he says, Fortress has unwound many of its positions that reflected its “pro-growth” mindset, including investments in Asian currencies.
The pro-growth trade began to gain popularity about a year ago, when the banking crisis was thought to have passed. Investors, in particular big macro hedge funds that make bets based on their broad economic views, grew convinced that global growth led by China, India and Korea would pick up steam. When the trade worked, other funds jumped on the bandwagon.
Among the major hedge funds thought to have been big players in at least one or more of the pro-growth bets include Paulson & Co., Moore Capital Management and Fortress. Wall Street, in particular Goldman Sachs, provided investment ideas to hedge funds to play the trade. Spokesmen for Paulson and Moore declined to comment.
Among the most popular pieces of the “pro-growth” trade were: bullish bets on the U.S. stock market, the Australian and Canadian dollars and the Brazilian real. Investors bet against U.S. Treasurys and the Japanese yen, which are considered safe havens that rise when investors are worried about growth.
Some investors bought commodities that they thought would be linked to a surge in manufacturing, such as copper. Many investors put on bearish bets on the euro as a hedge against a bet on global growth.
“There was a widespread view among hedge funds that the place to be was long global growth,” says David Kostin, who follows hedge funds for Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
…
There was a widespread view among hedge funds that the place to be was long global growth
Herd behavior at its best.
Why don’t they just set it right, and change the moniker “hedge fund” to “herd fund”?
Hedges, herds, whatever. Both are there to be trimmed.
My former broker was in a meeting with Paulson about two months ago. He was hyping his new Au fund to brokers. He is making a big play into the PM. I embrace his strategy somewhat but my problem with these so called “experts” is they need to use my $. While collecting generous management fees. There were other profit sharing covenants to benefit JP. I finally reached a point where I couldn’t take these peoples greed. My broker also said the guy was an arrogant prick. During the meeting JP looked at his watch and said “We’re done” and got up and left the room. Hubris run amok.
I suggested two things to my broker, whom I like btw.
#1 - Take a long hot shower when you get home from work.
#2 - Keep a UPS jacket and hat in your closet. When the mob storms your building put on the UPS gear and shout to the crowd “He’s in there” while pointing at your soon to be demolished office.
SV Guy,
Wasn’t that right about the time ( or shortly thereafter ) that the Aussies implemented a 40% Tax! on the mining co’s?
Nice ‘research’ fellas. Worth every penny of their Fee I’m sure.
I think you’re right DinOR about the tax.
Research is overrated when you win regardless of the investment return.
SVGuy,
I probably wouldn’t have even known about that myself except for the fact I have a good trader friend that lives or dies based on what Freeport McMoran etc. does.
Bully for you walking out btw.
There are 2 ways to get rich in the world.
1) Acquire more money than everyone else.
2) Make everyone else lose money so they have even less than you in comparison.
Many fund managers adopt both strategies, hence the “surprising” losses investors often suffer when trusting them.
The problem, IMHO, is confusing government bailouts and money printing with “growth.”
There has been no real growth, IMHO in years in this economy overall. Just bailouts, printing money, and lies. Now, as this reality hits home, suddenly things are “worse than expected!”
There’s been no real growth in this country at all since the 1980s. It’s ALL been Wall St. funny money games while jobs were sent offshore, real wages stagnated and our industrial base was slowly dismantled.
Actually one thing has been showing quite tremendous growth since the 1980’s.
Good find.
Yeah good point. But you have to admit, the best place to park your money was stock funds as soon as the movie “Blade Runner” came out - 1982 and just held. Whether you cashed out in 2000 or cashed out in 2008 (in October) you would be very well off if you put $50,000 in the S&P 500 index fund that year. You’d be a millionaire if you put $50,000 in VFINX upon its inception date in 1976 and just held. Gold was around $105 per ounce in August of 1976, so the S&P would have been a better deal than $50,000 in gold in 1976.
Everyone now is asking “Where is the next bubble so that I can ride on it?”
Just accumulate and sip on a fine wine. Who cares?
Executives who gained–or lost–the most in the economic crisis
By David A. Graham
Who says a financial catastrophe is bad for everyone? A few lucky financiers and policymakers have seen their stars rise as the global economy has fallen. Others, however, have become pariahs, subject to the scorn of their peers and the general public, and are blamed with bringing down the financial system. Here are the five biggest winners and five biggest losers of the financial crisis.
I see the pre-markets have gone from green to red, I’m sure the spin dotors will be pumping/pimping as hard as they can this AM.
Death by CDO: What killed Fort Pierce’s Riverside National Bank and
By Robert Trigaux, The St. Petersburg Times
Posted: 9:54 a.m. Thursday, May 20, 2010
If there’s a mantra small Florida financial institutions should repeat, it is this:
Don’t tug on Superman’s cape.
Don’t spit into the wind.
And above all, don’t mess around with collateralized debt obligations.
If you thought “CDOs” were just part of the alphabet soup of controversial Wall Street creations that get vaguely mentioned in the news but have no practical effect here in Florida, guess again.
CDOs have suddenly cropped up as a principal cause for the recent demise of at least two Florida financial institutions: Eastern Financial Florida Credit Union in Miramar and Riverside National Bank of Florida in Fort Pierce.
In both cases, less-than-savvy managers of these struggling Florida institutions were convinced by Wall Street that heavy, leveraged investing in CDOs somehow could rescue them from their downward spiral brought on by recession and the popped real estate bubble.
As doomsday scenarios go, this sounds awfully familiar.
Riverside, which failed last month, was taken over by Canadian-owned TD Bank.
Eastern Financial, chartered way back in 1937 and sponsored by now-defunct Eastern Airlines, failed last May and its remains were absorbed by the Space Coast Credit Union. It had offices in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties.
Other Florida institutions got bushwhacked by CDOs, too. But let’s eyeball Eastern Financial and Riverside National more closely and see how two such unsophisticated institutions bet so big, and so badly, on investing in CDOs.
So we are clear from the start, CDOs are securities that are backed by a pool of bonds, loans and other assets. Wall Street sells them.
A recent report from the inspector general of the National Credit Union Administration, the federal overseer of credit unions, shows how a naive Eastern Financial got stuck with a concentrated pile of CDOs purchased from Wall Street, how quickly those investments dropped in value, and how effectively they gutted the credit union’s bottom line and led to its failure.
“Eastern Financial’s board failed to understand and manage the level of risk undertaken by management in its acceptance of the strategy to invest in higher risk CDO investments,” the inspector general report concludes.
The sad tale of Riverside National’s demise - death by CDO - is much the same.
One CDO package called “Taberna II” and purchased from Merrill Lynch lost 91 percent of its value. In all, Riverside’s CDOs lost two-thirds of their value.
The Florida bank had crammed its investment portfolio with 27 CDOs. If that does not sound like a lot, consider this. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. owns more than 250 CDOs purchased by small institutions that later failed. When Riverside failed, its pile of CDOs by itself nearly doubled the leveraged value of those debt obligations owned by the FDIC.
Many of the 200 bank failures since the beginning of 2009 have been accelerated by losses in CDOs similar to those Riverside purchased.
The End of the Euro
How the crisis in Greece could lead to the demise of Europe’s most ambitious project.
By Niall Ferguson | NEWSWEEK
Published May 7, 2010
From the magazine issue dated May 17, 2010
Crisis—from the Greek “krisis,” for a turning point in a disease—is one of many English words we owe to the ancient Athenians. Now their modern descendants are reminding us what it really means.
Just when it seemed safe to start using the word “recovery,” a Greek crisis is threatening the world economy, and the very existence of the world’s second-biggest currency.
The euro seemed like such a good idea just 10 years ago. Europe had already achieved remarkable levels of integration as a trading bloc, to say nothing of its consolidation as a legal community. Monetary union offered all kinds of alluring benefits. It would end forever the exchange-rate volatility that had bedeviled the continent since the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system of fixed rates in the 1970s. No more annoying and costly currency conversions for travelers and businesses. And greater price transparency would improve the flow of intra-European trade.
A single European currency also seemed to offer a sweet trade. European countries with problems of excessive public debt would get German-style low inflation and interest rates. And the Germans could quietly hope that the euro would be a little weaker than their own super-strong Deutsche mark.
Monetary union had geopolitical appeal, too. In the wake of German reunification, the French worried that Europe was heading for a new kind of domination by its biggest member state. Getting the Germans to pool monetary sovereignty would increase the power of the other members over a potential Fourth Reich. And, best of all, it would create an alternative reserve currency to challenge the mighty U.S. dollar.
Still, when European Commission president Jacques Delors first proposed monetary union, it seemed a wildly ambitious project. Even when it was formally adopted as the third pillar of the European Union in the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, many economists—myself included—remained skeptical.
…
Financial Shockwaves Around the World
By Katie Paul, Lily Huang. Kathy Jones and David Graham
Wall Street and Main Street weren’t the only places struck with financial fear when the financial crisis hit in 2008. Around the globe, economies large and small continue to reel from the United States’ financial crisis. Once stable European banks faced failure or government bailout. Meanwhile, emerging markets, such as the Baltic states, which enjoyed robust growth in the past few years, were suffering unrest as their economies rapidly deteriorated (at left, rioters in Athens protest the Greek government’s “austerity” spending cuts on May 5, 2010). Here is a look at how an American-made crisis has shaken markets, and nations, the world over.
Sorry for the misplaced link to the Meg Whitman story; I got a story ahead of myself while posting. Try this one.
This is hardly just an American-made crisis. The Brits were hip deep in risky financing schemes too. Americans had nothing to do with housing bubbles in Spain, UK, Ireland that have collapsed much less ones in Australia and Canada that haven’t, but will. Wall Street made things worse, but many other areas would have been in trouble even in the absence of the actions of Wall Street.
SDGreg,
Sorry, that’s a point of view we frown upon here. Any possible explanation that doesn’t start, end and completely blame Wall Street simply will -not- be tolerated!
This is hardly just an American-made crisis. The Brits were hip deep in risky financing schemes too. Americans had nothing to do with housing bubbles in Spain, UK, Ireland that have collapsed much less ones in Australia and Canada that haven’t, but will.
Agreed. I’m pretty tired of the “American exceptionalism” argument as applied to wreaking havoc in financial markets — we may be leading edge in creating Financial Instruments Of Mass Destruction, but there were (and are) plenty of other international players in this particular game.
Bye bye, Celtic Tiger. Bye bye, Costa del Sol. Bye bye, Winnipeg real estate values of a lifetime …
Bye bye, Celtic Tiger. Bye bye, Costa del Sol. Bye bye, Winnipeg real estate values of a lifetime …
Indeed. We live during “interesting” times, when all of the true, wealth generating activity is performed in 3rd world cesspools by peons who are paid less tha burger flippers in the 1st world.
There never was a Celtic Tiger. Corporate America briefly set up shop in Ireland until they found even cheaper pastures.
ET-Chicago,
Right, someone needs to call the Dept. of Blame America First ASAP! All thru this thing I’ve been forced to defend my pos. that the Cap Gains Exemeption was a good part of what caused The Bubble.
Others were only too quick to point out.., Well how does that explain the boom in Spain, Ireland etc? I still don’t have an acceptable explanation other than to offer, it’s simply the nature of mania’s?
All I can say is “If Tommy jumped off a bridge, does tha mean -you- have to do it too?” Nobody wanted to run the risk of not gettin’ their’s, and obviously all bankers think alike.
Nobody wanted to run the risk of not gettin’ their’s, and obviously all bankers think alike.
Not just the bankers — potential real estate “owners” the world ’round bought the same claptrap hook, line & sinker.
We hear a lot about how the typical American consumer is fat, greedy, and ignorant. Well, no argument there, let’s just note that the rest of the world’s population is more or less cut from the same cloth. American consumers ain’t cornered the market on stupid.
Yeah — it is funny how a global real estate mania gets pinned on America. Nonetheless, you have to admit there were lots of subprime mortgage lending kingpins headquartered on Wall Street (Megabank, Inc) and K Street (Fan and Fred).
Well right, and we haven’t forgotten that Northern Rock Trust’s demise has a direct linkage to US.
I think this though was more about home ‘prices’ themselves than the actual financing ‘mechanisms’. Our level of blame has gotten more than it’s fair share of press time.
Sounds to me like once the dust of the current wave of financial panic once again settles on this Senate financial reform bill, Wall Street will be able to take great comfort in the role of the fox-in-the-chicken-coop Fed to execute its provisions from behind their veil of secrecy.
And we already learned from the Fall 2008 collapse of Fannie and Freddie that systemic risk regulators don’t work, as the GSEs had a dedicated regulatory oversight agency all along right until the day they blew up. Guess we get to relearn that lesson again a few decades hence, neh?
* The Wall Street Journal
* POLITICS
* MAY 20, 2010
Senate Passes Finance Bill
Biggest Regulatory Overhaul of Wall Street Since Depression Moves Closer to Law
By GREG HITT And DAMIAN PALETTA
Sen. Scott Brown stands outside of the Senate chamber before voting on Thursday.
WASHINGTON—The Senate on Thursday approved the most extensive overhaul of financial-sector regulation since the 1930s, hoping to avoid a repeat of the financial crisis that hit the U.S. economy starting in 2007.*
The legislation passed the Senate 59 to 39 and must now be reconciled with a similar bill passed by the House of Representatives in December, before it can be sent to President Barack Obama to be signed into law.
The controversial measure, supported by the Obama administration, sets up new regulatory bodies and restricts the actions of banks and other financial firms. It is designed to try to make order of the cascading regulatory chaos that ensued in 2008 when mammoth banks and some unregulated financial firms collapsed, and public funds were used to save them. Among other things, the legislation would:
• Establish a new council of “systemic risk” regulators to monitor growing risks in the financial system, with the goal of preventing companies from becoming too big to fail and stopping asset bubbles from forming, such as the one that led to the housing crisis.
Sen. Christopher Dodd, left, smiles while flanked by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (second from the right), Sen. Richard Durbin (right), Sen. Blanche Lincoln (second from the left) and Sen. Mark Warner after the Senate voted to pass Wall Street reform on Thursday.
• Create a new consumer protection division within the Federal Reserve charged with writing and enforcing new rules that target abusive practices in businesses such as mortgage lending and credit-card issuance.
• Empower the Federal Reserve to supervise the largest, most complex financial companies to ensure that the government understands the risks and complexities of firms that could pose a risk to the broader economy.
• Allow the government in extreme cases to seize and liquidate a failing financial company in a way that protects taxpayers from future bailouts.
• Give regulators new powers to oversee the giant derivatives market, increasing transparency by forcing most contracts to be traded through third-parties instead of only between banks and their customers. Derivatives, which are complex financial instruments, are often used to hedge risk. Speculative trading in the contracts led to losses at many banks in the 2008 crisis.
“Simply, the American people are saying, ‘you’ve got to protect us,’ and we didn’t back down from that,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.). “When this bill becomes law, the joyride on Wall Street will come to a screeching halt.”
…
*It ain’t over till it’s over.
“Consumer protection.” HA! I’ll believe it when I see it.
This house builder, Chuck Miller, is going through the numbers on the cost of building a house versus traditional affordability and is doing a right fair job of it, too. He ends this article with a muse about building apartments. I think he is actually getting it.
I’ve included some excerpts. He has the irritating habit of repeatedly asking if this is realistic. House builders should not attempt rhetorical writing styles. They can’t pull it off.
Google this (below) and you’ll find his blog:
Chuck Miller GMB CGB CGP MIRM CMP MCSP CSP
Roidy
“As a Builder, I am extremely interested in the current debate about the home building and mortgage finance industry. One comment I have heard repeatedly over the past several weeks is the need to return to “sound mortgage standards” based on home values of 2.5 to 3 times income, 30 year fixed rate mortgages at 80% loan-to-value and a 20% down payment. But just how realistic is this?
According to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the median household income in the U.S. in 2007 was $59,000. If we return to sound mortgage standards, median home values would have to be $147,500 (2.5x) to $177,000 (3x).
So under “sound mortgage standards,” a household earning the median income would have to save $29,500 (2.5x) to $35,400 (3x) - 50% to 58.5% of their annual household income - for their down payment before they could purchase a home. Is this realistic? I did an informal poll of mortgage lenders and found that, home buyers with down payments of 20% or more accounted for approximately 30% of the purchase transactions over the past 12 months and approximately 70% of home buyers purchased their homes with less than 20% down.”
… and so on and so forth. I think he really understands. Really. - Roidy
I read the article and came away thinking he did not want to accept the reality that with reasonable lending standards, a huge piece of the house buying market is going away, and with that the livlihood of a lot of house builders.
The NAR and NHBA realize that to be the case, and oppose even realatively minor changes such the repeal of the mortgage interest deduction, which, in practical terms should not affect demand for housing to any significant degree.
By this guys reasoning, we should go back to the lending standards of 2006, as it allows him to earn massive amounts of money building home, and to employ legions of tradesmen, ultimately at the taxpayers expense.
The whole RE mkt was structured so as to render the Down Payment obsolete! Hey, it was hardly just first time buyers that were coming in w/ low/no DP.
Mortgage brokers were very adept at explaining to even doctors and well paid pub. employees ( the -ultimate- leveraging tool ) that they were a thing of the past!
Once ( or when ) you sell your home, you’ll ( I’ll ) pay down all these bills you have on your credit report and the only thing showing will be the house! ( Which is 100% deductible against your income btw, wink-wink )
Spokaneman,
I thought the same as you do. Then I realized that with the amount of data and understanding he was in possession of, he has begun an epiphany. His turning point arises from initiation of an understanding and ergo a different viewpoint. No, Chuck Miller isn’t quite there yet. Still, he cannot stay where he is intellectually speaking. He has attained understanding and with understanding comes action. You are looking at the beginnings of an epiphany.
There is hope yet.
Roidy
“U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the median household income in the U.S. in 2007 was $59,000″
Say what? NO effin way.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf
Page 5 (graphic)- 2007 median household income = $50,233
Excerpt: Real median household income increased 1.3 percent between 2006 and 2007, from $49,568 to $50,233
That’s what, a 15% difference? I’d like a 15% raise, please!
Exactly. They’ve projected a curve that doesn’t exist in reality and have been for years if not decades.
The only folks I know who have been getting more than cost living raises (+/-3%) over the last 20 years are those who make over 100K.
Felipe Calderon`s Flying Circus
Felipe Calderon Gets Standing Ovation In Congress After Condemning Arizona Immigration Law
First Posted: 05-20-10 01:07 PM
Mexican President Felipe Calderon spoke before a joint session of Congress Thursday and received resounding applause after condemning Arizona’s controversial immigration law.
“I am convinced that a comprehensive immigration reform is also crucial to securing our common border. However, I strongly disagree with the recently adopted law in Arizona,” Calderon said.
Applause then broke out for around 15 seconds, while Democratic members of Congress, Attorney General Eric Holder, Director of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and Vice President Joe Biden joined in the standing ovation. It appeared that most lawmakers on the Republican side of the aisle remained seated.
AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
Wolf Blitzer Questions Mexican President Felipe Calderon
by Maynard on May 20, 2010
BLITZER: So if people want to come from Guatemala or Honduras or El Salvador or Nicaragua, they want to just come into Mexico, they can just walk in?
CALDERON: No. They need to fulfill a form. They need to establish their right name. We analyze if they have not a criminal precedent. And they coming into Mexico. Actually…
BLITZER: Do Mexican police go around asking for papers of people they suspect are illegal immigrants?
CALDERON: Of course. Of course, in the border, we are asking the people, who are you?
And if they explain…
BLITZER: At the border, I understand, when they come in.
CALDERON: Yes.
BLITZER: But once they’re in…
CALDERON: But not — but not in — if — once they are inside the — inside the country, what the Mexican police do is, of course, enforce the law. But by any means, immigration is a crime anymore in Mexico.
BLITZER: Immigration is not a crime, you’re saying?
CALDERON: It’s not a crime.
BLITZER: So in other words, if somebody sneaks in from Nicaragua or some other country in Central America, through the southern border of Mexico, they wind up in Mexico, they can go get a job…
CALDERON: No, no.
BLITZER: They can work.
CALDERON: If — if somebody do that without permission, we send back — we send back them.
BLITZER: You find them and you send them back?
CALDERON: Yes. However, especially with the people of Guatemala, we are providing a new system in which any single citizen from Guatemala could be able to visit any single border (INAUDIBLE) in the south. And even with all the requirements, he can or she can visit any parts of Mexico.
I would have told Pepe we’ll just convert to the same laws they enforce, and then bounced his punk ass back across the boarder!
Ah, so protecting their borders and nation is fine for them, but not for America. Got it.
Link?
just go to google and type…wolf blitzer interview calderon…it’ll come up.
Thanks.
Got to love the Presidential Race Card.
I need to buy a new hypocrisy meter. Mine just broke.
Made in China or Mexico?
Recent college grads won’t be buying housing any time soon:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a8f9A4GYLECE&pos=14
“Ten months after graduating from Ohio State University with a civil-engineering degree and three internships, Matt Grant finally has a job — as a banquet waiter at a Clarion Inn near Akron, Ohio.”
“Schools from Grant’s alma mater to Harvard University will soon begin sending a wave of more than 1.6 million men and women with bachelor’s degrees into a labor market with a 9.9 percent jobless rate, according to the Education and Labor departments.”
Students who graduated in the early 1980s — when two recessions drove unemployment to a peak of 10.8 percent — suffered wage losses of more than $100,000 in the next 15 years compared with those who came into the job market during the decade’s boom years, according to Kahn’s research.
“They get shifted down into a lower level and lower pay scale,” she said. “They are working for worse firms, they’re not learning as many skills and they’re not moving up the career pyramid as quickly.”
“Unemployment among people under 25 years old was 19.6 percent in April, the highest level since the Labor Department began tracking the data in 1948.”
For all of the efforts to prop up financial firms, the economy’s still fundamentally broken with near depression level unemployment. How does housing or anything else recover amidst that backdrop?
SDGreg,
Simple ( it doesn’t ) But I’m sure the Clarion Inn is a very, very nice place! God help us.
Recent engineering grads waiting tables as their sole source of income after a year out of school just screams green shoots doesn’t it?
That doesn’t bode well for the future of the country, does it? There’s a lot of work to be done to undue 30 years of bad policies and bad decisions.
Uh, recent college grads SHOULDN’T be buying a house right out of college no matter what the economic climate.
Agreed. But how are they going to move up from the house that mommy and daddy bought them so they’d have a place to stay while going to school?
I suppose the main point was diminished economic circumstances will delay the time until most new grads are in a position to buy which is yet one more reduction in future demand in the near term.
True, that.
European markets slide despite German vote- AP
Europe’s stock markets slid again Friday even though German lawmakers approved a massive eurozone rescue package — another sign that worries over the continent’s debt crisis and the future of the euro currency itself have not gone away.
Calif. City Takes Stand Against Illegal Immigration as Ariz. Boycott Battle Rages ~ FOXNews.com
A California city mere miles from the metropolis that imposed a boycott on Arizona over its immigration law has just weighed in on the other side of the debate — voting to declare itself a “Rule of Law City” where illegal immigrants are not welcome.
A California city mere miles from the metropolis that imposed a boycott on Arizona over its immigration law has just weighed in on the other side of the debate — voting to declare itself a “Rule of Law City” where illegal immigrants are not welcome.
The decision by the Costa Mesa City Council comes after the Los Angeles City Council voted last week to suspend official travel to Arizona and end future contracts with state businesses in protest of Arizona’s immigration policy. That decision sparked a war of words between Los Angeles and Arizona officials, who this week warned the city their Arizona-based power supply could be at risk.
Rhode Island lawmaker files bill that follows Arizona immigration law
By Karen Lee Ziner
Journal Staff Writer
PROVIDENCE –– State Rep. Peter G. Palumbo, saying that he’s “fed up,” and “we’re all under attack” by illegal immigrants, has filed a bill mirroring a controversial Arizona law that is considered the toughest immigration legislation in the country.
Palumbo’s bill, like the Arizona law, gives local police more authority to question and arrest illegal immigrants. It makes failure to carry immigration documents a state crime, and requires police to question people “where reasonable suspicion exists” that the person is unlawfully in the United States. The bill, H 8142, also targets people who hire illegal immigrants, or who knowingly transport them.
Much of Palumbo’s bill is taken verbatim from the Arizona bill, SB 1070, signed into law by Gov. Jan Brewer last month, over the objection of President Obama. It would put in place far stricter controls than Palumbo’s previous unsuccessful attempts, or Governor Carcieri’s controversial 2008 executive order cracking down on illegal immigration.
Palumbo, a Cranston Democrat, had stated he had no plans to file such legislation this year. But he changed his mind last week as opposition to the Arizona law — including a spreading economic boycott and legal challenges — continued to mount.
“What pushed me over the edge was, when I heard the mayor of San Francisco and mayor of L.A. chastising the governor [Brewer] for her efforts, I just snapped. When they said they’re going to economically boycott one of their sovereign states — that’s what did it,” Palumbo said.
“We’re all under attack, basically,” he said. “People are coming in from all our borders and they’re coming in quickly. Everyone agrees something needs to be done … I’m trying to show the people in Arizona that there are more people in support of them, than against them.”
“Rule of Law”
What a concept.
+1,000,000
A rule of law city?!
What?! Unpossible! Law is for “others” - right? Hey, maybe they can dish out Law to any Wall Street crooks that show up in their city, too! I’d love that.
Good for Costa Mesa! Enforce the law since the crooks in charge won’t!
It will be interesting to see if they pass any laws to back it up, because “Coasta Mesa” is very hispanic.
Costa Mesa is snow white OC.
Predictions for the stock market today?
1. PPT defibrillator set on high?
2. “He’s dead, Jim?”
PPT will be hot on the job today, along with the BS soothsayers in MSM. Going below 10,000 at the opening bell for sure, but who knows how it will close. I think the DOW is heading back down to 8000 and below over the rest of this year.
Gonna need bigger props!
Dow 5000 realistic?
Fat Finger Friday!!!!!!!!!!
“Dow 5000 realistic”?
I certainly think that 5000 is very realistic, of course many folks will scoff at that number. Far too many financial falsehoods out there, intermingled with trillions of government pump dollars.
The system will eventually flush itself, and lots of unsuspecting people will get hammered. That’s the nature of the beast.
“The system will eventually flush itself, and lots of unsuspecting people will get hammered.”
Yep. That’s when it will be time to move out of cash and into stocks.
I love America. Land of opportunity.
If the flush is “allowed”* to occur, I might just become an optimist…for a while anyway.
* no more Keynesian nonsense
‘If the flush is “allowed”* to occur,…’
fuggetaboutit
The flush is only allowed to continue with ample liquidity to paper over nominal losses with future inflation, coupled with a wealth transfer from Main Street retirees on fixed income pensions towards the Wall Street Megabank bonus pool.
Fed financial engineering in action…
6000 by September.
Don’t you need higher Treasury yields for the DJIA to retrace to 6K?
In due time…
I think the DOW is heading back down to 8000 and below over the rest of this year.
I wouldn’t mind seeing that scenario, really, but thusfar the propping has been pretty resilient.
Is it different is time?
“I wouldn’t mind seeing that scenario, really, but thusfar the propping has been pretty resilient”.
Very true, the digital printers are running at warp factor 5, and the PTB are bound and determined to allow no failure. At some point it can not be sustained. When? I don’t know, but the fuse is lite globally. We are in a new financial frontier.
What is sad is that the “cure” - runaway inflation - is worse than the problem, which is the mountain of lies and debt crashing down.
Looks like the dead cat bounce is done. Pretty obvious in the 6 month chart.
~ As of Wednesday the nation’s debt clock was ticking ever closer to the $13 trillion mark. Not to worry! Congress recently voted to raise the debt ceiling to $14.3 trillion so it can keep spending money it doesn’t have until after the November elections.
Cool, we gots Mo Money! Hopefully we can hit 15 trillion over the next year. We’re #1.
Maybe we should start a pool.
A drowning pool?
Do-it-yourself waterboarding.
Sputter.
Wonder what percentage of people in prison are evil pot smokers and small time drug dealers?
“With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States has almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners.”
~ Laurence Vance
Well, in all fairness, a great number of countries don’t always take prisoners - they shoot and ask questions (or not) later.
And a fair percentage of USA’s prisoners are illegal immigrants, which might skew the stats a bit.
Well, in all fairness, a great number of countries don’t always take prisoners - they shoot and ask questions (or not) later.
In all fairness, America is supposed to be a democracy (er, republic), not a police state. Our numbers are telling, however, particularly in regard to the so-called War On Drugs.
Since when does being a democracy/republic preclude the right to lock up criminals?
Since when does being a democracy/republic preclude the right to lock up criminals?
Since when did it become OK for a democracy to lock up a greater percentage of its legal population than any autocratic/totalitarian regime on the planet?
“Since when did it become OK for a democracy to lock up a greater percentage of its legal population than any autocratic/totalitarian regime on the planet?”
That was my original point: we’re locking criminals up. An autocratic/totalitarian regime often just executes their criminals (or suspected criminals for that matter). That’s one way to keep prison populations low and skews the average.
Now measton (see post below) has a point that maybe some things that are illegal shouldn’t be, and sometimes the punishment doesn’t fit the crime, but that’s a different argument.
Now measton (see post below) has a point that maybe some things that are illegal shouldn’t be, and sometimes the punishment doesn’t fit the crime, but that’s a different argument.
No, it’s part of the same argument. We lock up too many non-violent offenders, mostly for drug-related offenses. That’s exhaustively documented, so I feel no need to mention it. (But thanks, Measton.)
Furthermore, execution rates aren’t that high anywhere with a stable-but-repressive regime (e.g., I’m not talking about countries in open turmoil — the Congo, etc. — but somewhere like China or North Korea). Fold in documented execution rates with incarceration rates and we still come out on top. That’s shameful.
One more thing: according to Amnesty International, we rank #5 in the world in documented executions, right behind such luminaries as China, Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. (North Korean data is hard to come by, but assuming they and a few other repressive regimes best us in this category, we still easily land in the top 10.)
I would be willing to be that in most of those regimes you mentioned, undocumented execution rates are far higher than undocumented, which again skews the numbers.
You have no data to back up your premise, just a “gut feeling”? You’re beginning to sound like a Realtor.
Do you really think we belong in the same company as China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, North Korea, et al — and if so, why?
There is no developed country that comes close to our rates of execution or incarceration, plain and simple. As far as the verifiable data goes, we’re ahead of every other country as well, no matter how poor they are or what form of government they live under. Do you find that acceptable?
You have no data to back up your premise, just a “gut feeling”?
You have no data to back up yours either, other than giving totalitarian regimes the benefit of the doubt.
You have no data to back up yours either, other than giving totalitarian regimes the benefit of the doubt.
What are you talking about? There’s plenty of data. And I wasn’t giving anyone the benefit of the doubt.
First, it’s easy to demonstrate that we’re the 30-length leaders in both execution and incarceration rates in the “free” (used loosely, as that term is a little nebulous) world. That includes our first world nation-peers as well as countries with less-than-sterling civil rights reputations, like Singapore, Venezuela, and Pakistan. I know you’re smart enough to find that data.
Secondly, there is indeed verifiable data for places such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, culled from their own reports as well as independent sources (pick your favorite: Amnesty International, the UN, the CIA, and many others if those don’t appeal to you). Want to multiply that data by two or three or five for skeptic’s sake? Go ahead, we’re still (embarrassingly) in the hunt.
I’m all for jail.
I’d let all the drug users go and legalize drugs.
That would make plenty of room for real criminals.
I’m for 2 strikes (if they are violent) and your out.
Vandalism, breaking and entering, mugging people get you a slap on the wrist now. White call crime get’s no jail or a club med vacation. These people need to spend serious time in jail.
Jail takes bad people off the street and gives good people a job.
I’d much rather spend money on jail then welfare and unemployment.
The bigger question is how many prisoners cant read, write or speak English?
I would venue a realistic guess 90% speak ghetto. So it’s no wonder we jail a lot of seriously stupid people.
I have to agree with this from first hand observation.
Can we spay and neuter them at the same time? Might avoid a lot of future problems.
Bad news. They have babies somewhere between high school and prison.
Well what do you expect in a land where the most advanced, scientific and technical achievement in propaganda and social engineering is used to make people dissatisfied… just to make them buy things?
And then destroys their jobs?
QUESTION FOR ALL HBB’ers:
My boss who has consistently overpriced his house and can’t sell it, thinks the thing to do is to get a ReEVERSE MORTGAGE.
He’s 62, retiring , has significant savings, but has already bought his dream condo in So. Cal. (near John Wayne Airport) on the other side of the country.
I told him he would be better off just making a huge price reduction and selling the thing.
Thoughts?
Nothing price cant fix!Your boss should be working for you.
I find it constantly amazing how many stupid people have money and positions of authority.
“I told him he would be better off just making a huge price reduction and selling the thing”.
Thoughts?
You told him exactly what he should do, IMHO. Probably won’t change his mind on the reverse mortgage though.
“Real estate always goes up in the long run”… even if it takes 50 years.
Reverse mortgages easily come with fees up to 10 percent. If he’s serious about a reverse mortgage then he’ll need to shop around.
A very dear friend (who, quite frankly, was not of sound mind) got a reverse mortgage in 2006. Fell in the shower and broke her leg pretty badly before Xmas 2007.
After surgery and five weeks in a rehab center, it was obvious that she’d no longer be able to live in her house. So, one of her sons moved her into his place.
House got a cosmetic fixup and was put on the market in mid-2008. Didn’t sell. “For Sale” sign came down in February 2009. That summer, I heard that the place was in foreclosure. It was listed for sale last year and appears to have been sold to…
…someone who’s living there. I’ll have to bike by and see. In a lot of cases, the property is listed as residential owner-occupied, but it’s really a rental.
If he can find a sucker to pay him more than it’s worth, very unlikely, take the money and run.
I must admit I am not well versed in RM’s. If the lenders only claim is to that particular property it might be worth doing.
Reverse mortgages are killers with huge fees.
I believe that the home has to be your principal residence to qualify for a Reverse Mortgage, does it not?
FNM is going below .90 today, gubmint better get to pumping it up.
What time are they going to wheel out the ppt today?
Oh we’ll probably get one of those mid day or afternoon “miracle” turn arounds, due some better than “expected” numbers from somewhere to close just over 10,000. Da Boyz don’t like turning deep red going into the weekend.
No matter, I think we will be closer to 8000 than 12,000 sooner than many may think.
O’Bummer Sings “Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran” and the MSM Conveniently Freezes:
As if uncontrollable economic contagion was not enough for the administration, Obama is now willing to add geopolitical risk to the current extremely precarious economic and financial situation. Over at Debkafile we read that the WH occupant has decided to “boost US military strength in the Mediterranean and Persian Gulf regions in the short term with an extra air and naval strike forces and 6,000 Marine and sea combatants.” With just one aircraft carrier in proximity to Iran, the Nobel peace prize winner has decided to send a clear message that peace will no longer be tolerated, and has decided to increase the US aircraft carrier presence in the region by a 400-500% CAGR.
with attribution to Zero Hedge
My mother keeps saying that war is coming. Considering she’s been through it and Opie hasn’t, I’ll listen to family over a politician any day.
We’re either setting the stage to defend Israel against counterattacks when it starts bombing Iran, OR sending Israel a message that it better not bomb Iran.
Given who currently resides in the White House, I suggest it’s the latter.
Check out Charles Krauthammer’s column today. WaPo has it and there are other links as well.
We’re either setting the stage to defend Israel against counterattacks when it starts bombing Iran, OR sending Israel a message that it better not bomb Iran.
Given who currently resides in the White House, I suggest it’s the latter.
History shows what happens to nations who get into military or political conflicts against the Israelis/Jews. Things tend to not work out so well for them.
I really, really hope we don’t get into such a course of action.
Wealth Destroyed
War not immediate…
Hwy50
You sure? Let’s hope you’re right, after all, war is in a sense the ultimate stimulative policy tool.
War is coming? Did she forget about Afghanistan and Iraq?
Meant to say, a bigger one.
Ah. On that she may be right.
The Prophet of Change is indeed going to change things… just not for the better.
“The Senate’s passage of the reform bill has some clear negatives for ratings agencies Moody’s Corp., S&P and McGraw-Hill’s”
Where the heck is his birth certificate…
Hwy50 sends kind regards to those Maine D.I.D.’s (Democrapts in Disguise)
Cheers ladies!
Big drop right off the bat…
NASDAQ Composite ~ Change:Down 113.97 (4.96%)
PPT fired off the turbo chargers, going green soon.
Today’s market is starting to remind me of some of my ex-girlfriends.
Hot and cold and hot and cold…
or
if you stay in game long enough you will be broke?
With …or without makeup?
Sounds to me like fun!
girlfriends
Bipolar? Or just slow to warm up?
Over-priced.
Schizophrenic.
Can’t hold one thought for more than a few seconds.
Controlled by a bunch of old men.
The jokes write themselves. For the day to truly end like one of my past relationships, it would have to close on a very sour note.
Well, at least you didn’t list… a Stalker!
Chase closing facility; 600 to lose jobs ~ May 21, 2010 News-Post
Six hundred employees of JPMorgan Chase will lose their jobs by the end of the year with the closing of the company’s credit card center in Frederick .
Tim Keefe, a spokesman for the financial company, said the decision to close the center on Presidents Court was announced to employees on Wednesday. Keefe spoke from the company’s credit card operations headquarters in Delaware.
Declining delinquent accounts and a need to create more business efficiency drove the decision, Keefe said. The center dealt primarily with delinquent credit card accounts.
Note that this is in Maryland, land of the Infinite Housing Bubble, where everyone has a job for life, money falls from the sky, and paying any less than 5x your household income for a house is just silly since “housing only goes up!”
I assume that some Realtor will be out there helping these folks who are now out of work to buy more overprices houses….
(In all seriousness, my sympathies to those losing their jobs.)
Seems premature.
Rand starts digging
What I don’t like from the president’s administration is this sort of, ‘I’ll put my boot heel on the throat of BP,’” Paul said in an interview with ABC’s “Good Morning America.” “I think that sounds really un-American in his criticism of business.”
OK BP has jeopordized the livelyhood of how many Americans and we shouldn’t say any harsh words. This makes me wonder how Rand views Wall Street? Should we not say anything bad about GS.
Here’s a retort POV:
The lesson of Rand Paul: libertarianism is juvenile
By Gabriel Winant, Salon
“Libertarians like Paul are walking around with the idea that the world could just snap back to a naturally-occurring benign order if the government stopped interfering. As Paul implied, good people wouldn’t shop at the racist stores, so there wouldn’t be any.
This is the belief system of people who have been the unwitting recipients of massive government backing for their entire lives. To borrow a phrase, they were born on third base, and think they hit a triple.
Think about the New Deal. Although libertarian ingrates will never admit it, without the reforms of the 1930s, there might not be private property left for them to complain about the government infringing on. Not many capitalist democracies could survive 25 percent unemployment, and it doesn’t just happen by good luck.”
“Ironically, the best way into this point comes from another brilliant libertarian, legal scholar Richard Epstein. Says Epstein, “To be against Title II in 1964 would be to be brain-dead to the underlying realities of how this world works.”
There’s the key — “the underlying realities of how the world works.” Because never, and I mean never, has there been capitalist enterprise that wasn’t ultimately underwritten by the state.”
“And that’s why the best rap on libertarians isn’t that they’re racist, or selfish. (Though some of them are those things, and their beliefs encourage both bad behaviors, even if accidentally.) It’s that they’re thoroughly out of touch with reality. It’s a worldview that prospers only so long as nobody tries it, and is too unreflective and self-absorbed to realize this. In other words, it’s bratty.”
(Hwy inserts a throwback tune…)
Artist: Fogerty John
Song: Centerfield
Album: Centerfield
Chorus:
Oh, put me in, coach - I’m ready to play today;
Put me in, coach - I’m ready to play today;
Look at me, I can be centerfield.
Got a beat-up glove, a homemade bat, and brand-new pair of shoes;
You know I think it’s time to give this game a ride.
Just to hit the ball and touch ’em all - a moment in the sun;
(pop) it’s gone and you can tell that one goodbye!
The emergence of Ron Paul, and now Rand Paul, remind me of what Gandhi once said:
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”.
Sounds like a slip cover endorsement for Lil’ Opie’s Bio…
“…really un-American in his criticism of business.”
Here we go with lil Opie & un-American again…
While, too, consider libertarians naive, at best, to say that large corporations shouldn’t be severely punished nor harshly crtisized for their catastrophic mistakes is insane… and truly un-American.
But what else would you expect from Corporate Communist Capitalism©®™, comrade?
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer, is seeking to take over U.S. transportation services from suppliers in an effort to reduce the cost of hauling goods.
The company is contacting all manufacturers that provide products to its more than 4,000 U.S. stores and Sam’s Club membership warehouse clubs, said Kelly Abney, Wal-Mart’s vice president of corporate transportation in charge of the project. The goal is to take over deliveries in instances where Wal-Mart can do the same job for less and use those savings to reduce prices in stores, he said.
Say goodbye to independent truckers.
My guess is that this will also increase the costs to businesses other than Wal-mart that buy from these same suppliers.
Exactly: Wal marts wants to own the whole distribution chain.
Remember when those crooks wanted to become a bank, though one that wasn’t really regulated because it would make their books look better? Yeah, gee, you think being able to play games with the books might make them look better.
They dream of a world where they are the only source of all products, jobs, money, etc. Where we all work there, bank there, eat there, and die there.
The end game of capitalism is oligopoly and monopoly. Then you no longer have capitalism you have corporatism. My guess is that eventually people and employees will become so poor that they will start shop lifting enough from big box stores that they will have a harder time competing against mom and pop who will guard their goods with a gun.
Rent the film “Rollerball” with James Caan.
WAY ahead of it’s time. The book was even scarier.
Personally I have no problem with it - as long as they’re not using government regulation to their advantage. (E.g. the way the banks use TBTF to their advantage, vis a vis lower borrowing costs for banks deemed as such).
Question - why is it that a company that doesn’t specialize in trucking, might be able to do trucking for cheaper than a company that does specialize in trucking? Wouldn’t the principle of specialization dictate otherwise?
(P.S. - that’s a rhetorical question. Without looking it up I’ll bet I know what the answer is.)
What if these transportation services were also used by their competitors? And what if they jacked up prices for them? It’s not quite to the level of Standard Oil, but it still gives me the heebie-jeebies.
This is exactly what it will do.
Company now needs to ship product in smaller quantities to competion, or even worse use FED Ex,.
The next step of course is to have Walmart buy up the highway system and exempt their trucks from paying a toll.
There’s a good idea. Take over the trucking so they can cut the wages and cut corners on safety.
That worked real good for the private bus industry. (increased accidents, deaths and safety violations. hmmm, come to think of it, that reminds me of airlines)
That worked real good for the private bus industry. (increased accidents, deaths and safety violations. hmmm, come to think of it, that reminds me of airlines)
????
Are you saying that the safety record of airlines has been getting worse ? My impression is exactly the opposite. I am a very nervous flyer and really hate air travel, but it seems that the safety record has gotten better and better over the last couple of decades. I rarely hear of serious accidents anymore.
The Wal-Mart virus: A great visual!
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/storysupplement/walmart_spread/index.html
Good find. I haven’t seen that in a while and had forgotten all about it.
That’s awesome, tankxs…
PS,
That large black area in Nevada…last spot in America where they did above ground nuclear testing…
“Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer, is seeking to take over U.S. transportation services from suppliers in an effort to reduce the cost of hauling goods.”
Keep in mind, this may mean they might not ship goods the same way as suppliers. This doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll cut corners on safety or reduce wages. J.B. Hunt and Schneider both increasingly use rail to move their trailers as it’s more energy efficient and cheaper. Walmart might simply end up using a mix of transportation modes that’s different and cheaper, not for lower wages or with less safety.
Jobless rates drop in 34 states and DC, sign employment picture is improving
WASHINGTON (AP) — Unemployment rates fell in a majority of states last month as improved economic conditions spurred hiring.
The Labor Department said Friday that 34 states and the District of Columbia reported lower jobless rates in April. Six states reported higher rates, while 10 saw unemployment hold steady.
That marked an improvement from March when 16 states and D.C. reported declines in unemployment, 22 states saw increases, and 12 had no change, according to revised figures.
South Carolina’s rate fell to 11.6 percent in April, from 12.2 percent in March. That marked the largest monthly drop of any state.
After cutting their work forces to the bone during the recession, companies are starting to boost hiring as their sales and profits improve.
Nationwide, employers added a net 290,000 job in April, the most in four years, the department reported earlier this month. The U.S. unemployment rate, though, rose to 9.9 percent as hundreds of thousands of job hunters — feeling more confident about their prospects — resumed or started searches.
Yet there were 200,00 layoff just of the “mass layoff” (defined as job cuts involving at least 50 people from a single employer ) category.
And again the “employment is up but so is unemployment” bull crap.
Doubleplus good, eh?
Colorado Department of Labor borrowing millions to pay unemployment benefits
DENVER - The state’s Unemployment Trust Fund has run out of money forcing the Colorado Department of Labor to borrow more than $250 million in federal funds to keep paying thousands of people who are out of work.
Advertisement
Because of the swell of unemployment claims during the recession, the Colorado Department of Labor says its unemployment fund has reached insolvency.
As of May 11, the state has borrowed $254 million in federal funds to continue to pay benefits to people who are unemployed.
“Thankfully we’ve been able to give the same benefits going forward even though we are borrowing money,” Executive Director of the Department of Labor & Employment Don Mares said.
Although people who are unemployed will not see a change in their checks, businesses across the state will feel the pinch in the form of unemployment insurance rate hikes.
Colorado Department of Labor borrowing millions to pay unemployment benefits
And unemployment is supposed to be “low” in the Centennial state, a “mere” 8%.
IIRC, most states are borrowing money to cover UE benefits.
Well known tax cheat, little Turbo Tax Timmy, will be traveling the globe calming the waters and instilling CON-fidence…
US, Britain and Germany to discuss debt crisis
WASHINGTON(AP) – Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will confer with finance officials in Britain and Germany next week about ways to restore global confidence in the financial system.
The Treasury Department announced the trip Thursday after a rough day on global financial markets. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 376 points, its biggest point drop since February 2009.
In a statement, Treasury said that Geithner will “meet with European officials to discuss the economic situation in the region and the measures being taken to restore global confidence and financial stability and to promote global recovery.”
Investors are concerned that the debt problems in countries like Greece and Portugal will spread across Europe and threaten to derail the economic recovery in the United States and elsewhere.
April mass layoffs rise led by manufacturing ~ May 21, 2010
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of mass layoffs by U.S. employers rose in April led by manufacturers who shed workers even as the economy began to recover.
The Labor Department said the number of mass layoff events — defined as job cuts involving at least 50 people from a single employer — increased by 228 to 1,856 as employers shed 200,870 jobs on a seasonally adjusted basis.
The number of mass layoffs in the manufacturing sector totaled 448 resulting in 63,616 initial jobless benefit claims, the department said. That was more than 24,000 higher than the previous month, but well below the 125,000 initial jobless claims in the manufacturing sector a year ago.
The Labor Department said the manufacturing sector accounted for 23 percent of all mass layoffs and 28 percent of the initial claims filed in April.
February-March 2010, the MSM begins chanting the mantra that manufacturing will lead the US out of its worst recession in 70 years.
Just sayin’.
Whose manufacturing? Ours or the Chinese?
Oops, doesn’t look ours.
(Reuters) - The number of mass layoffs by U.S. employers rose in April led by manufacturers who shed workers even as the economy began to recover.
The Labor Department said the number of mass layoff events — defined as job cuts involving at least 50 people from a single employer — increased by 228 to 1,856 as employers shed 200,870 jobs on a seasonally adjusted basis.
The number of mass layoffs in the manufacturing sector totaled 448 resulting in 63,616 initial jobless benefit claims, the department said. That was more than 24,000 higher than the previous month, but well below the 125,000 initial jobless claims in the manufacturing sector a year ago.
The Labor Department said the manufacturing sector accounted for 23 percent of all mass layoffs and 28 percent of the initial claims filed in April.
The U.S. jobs market is lagging the broader economic recovery that started in the second half of 2009. Since December 2007, when the worst recession in 70 years started, the U.S. economy has shed more than 8 million jobs and the latest data suggest it will take some time to make up for those losses.
It’s all good, just raise taxes, UK.
U.K. Posts Record April Deficit as Budget Looms (Update4)
May 21 (Bloomberg) — Britain posted its largest April budget deficit since monthly records began in 1993, highlighting the scale of the squeeze to come as Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne prepares to deliver an emergency budget.
The 10 billion-pound ($14.4 billion) shortfall compared with 8.8 billion pounds a year earlier, the Office for National Statistics said in London today. The result was below the 10.9 billion-pound median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey.
The report sets the scene for what economists say will be the sharpest cuts in public spending for a generation. Osborne has ordered departments to find 6 billion pounds of savings this year and will set out further measures in his June 22 budget.
“This is a hole that they’ll have to fill not just by spending cuts but also by tax rises,” said Peter Dixon, an economist at Commerzbank AG in London. “They have no room for maneuver.”
It looks like we’ve found our next Greek/Thialand riots.
Can’t they print their own just like us? Should prevent the scenario you describe.
Monthly records began in 1993?? Did Britain not get computers until then?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1280155/Pecking-order-Jackal-nipped-nose-trying-snatch-hungry-vultures-scrap-meat.html
This picture of a jackal getting nipped on the nose by a vulture cries out for a fitting caption by our gifted HBB snarks.
See below…
Goldenmansucks Vulture: “Oh, so…you have teeth, but what’s that badge you’re wearing…Oh, SEC, I’m like …sooooooooooooooo afraid!
The jackal represents Gollum’s clientele, and the vulture is John Paulson.
It’s GOOD to be the Banksta!
I’m thinking the vulture would be one of us gorging on the FB carrion that’s going to be littering the landscape after the REAL housing bubble bust. But what’s the jackal - a realtor? a mortgage broker? One of Gollum’s rented Congress-critters? But then I realized jackals are much higher life forms than any of them.
WOah. THe PPT kicked it into gear at 3:45
Highly irregular. Go to Zero Hedge later tonight. They’ll probably have an explanation.
Things seem to be a bit ABNORMAL in Normal, AL
Boy, there seems to be a lot of CORPORATIONS that are not cheerful about Lil’ Opie’s… Hope & Change activities…
Farmers tell feds poultry companies control them:
Farmers tell feds considering antitrust action that big poultry companies control industry
Christopher Leonard, AP Agribusiness Writer, On Friday May 21,
NORMAL, Ala. (AP)
“Friday’s hearing was packed with farmers, lobbyists and agribusiness representatives who are keeping a close eye on the hearings, eager to see what new rules or federal lawsuits might result.”
Kay Doby, a former chicken farmer from North Carolina, said government intervention is long overdue. Companies lure farmers into borrowing money to build chicken houses, then threaten to cancel their contracts if farmers complain about pay or refuse to invest more money to upgrade the buildings, she said.
“This system takes hardworking farmers and makes them indentured servants on their own land,” Doby said. “I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard that our contract would be canceled if we did such and such.”
Friday’s hearing was the second of five workshops that the Obama administration will hold this summer and fall to examine competition in agriculture, where seed, cattle, chicken and hog markets are dominated by a few large corporations.
Staples and other farmers said they have been putting up with more demands and smaller payments from the poultry companies. In some regions, farmers only have one or two potential buyers, so it’s hard to make demands. Staples owes more than $1 million on his farm, and he doesn’t want to upset Pilgrim’s Pride.
“The chicken companies know they don’t have to treat you fairly,” Staples said.
Staples, the 57-year-old Alabama poultry farmer, said he feared Pilgrim’s Pride would retaliate against him for his testimony, a notion that made the Army veteran choke up during his testimony.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who both attended the hearing, said stepped up antitrust enforcement in agricultural businesses is a top priority for the Obama administration. If that happens, farmers might earn more, but food prices might also increase.
Holder suggested during a news conference that the Justice Department hasn’t been vigilant enough in pursuing antitrust cases against big poultry companies.
“There is a new attitude in the antitrust division,” Holder said. “Everyone should understand. There is no hesitancy on the part of this antitrust division, in this administration, to take action where we think it is needed. This antitrust division is open for business again.”
BP swamped by criticism (But not from Rand-y Paul):
HOUSTON/VENICE, Louisiana (Reuters)
By Anna Driver and Matthew Bigg Anna Driver And Matthew Bigg
(Additional reporting by Anna Driver and Chris Baltimore in Houston, Matt Spetalnick in Washington; Tom Bergin in London; Writing by Pascal Fletcher; Editing by Bill Trott)
Boy, they put that “team” together in a flash…it would have taken the Gov’t what?… 3 years & how many hearings…If the Gov’t would just get out of their way,…BP would have this DEBACLE solved in24 hrs…
“BP said it was working with a newly created Flow Rate Technical Team to determine the exact amount of oil escaping.
Suttles said BP had spent almost $700 million on the spill response and had “thrown absolutely everything” at the job. BP also is drilling a relief well to try to plug the leak but it probably would not be finished until August.
On the Louisiana coast, fishermen counted the cost to their livelihoods. “This is going to keep killing stuff and it will make whole areas incapable of supporting marine life,” said George Barisich, president of the United Commercial Fishermen’s Association.
BP has promised to pay legitimate damages claims and faces billions of dollars in expected cleanup and damages costs.
“TrueDoNothing™ / “TrueObstructionists™ / TrueGridLokers™” &
“TrueAnger™” PeeParty tea toadlers might be sippin’ on some old Kentucky bourbon this weekend…
Fellow Republicans and even his ‘tea party’ backers steer clear of his remarks on the BP oil spill and civil rights laws.:
By Kathleen Hennessey, Tribune Washington Bureau May 22, 2010
“…Privately, Republicans said Friday that if elected, Paul and his vote would be welcomed into the caucus, but his more controversial views might not.
“Very extreme statements like the one on civil rights won’t be tolerated,” said a former leadership aide, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid angering party officials. “He’ll be treated much like Ron Paul is treated in the House — he caucuses with the majority, but they won’t have him on every vote.”
This simpleton is off to the jacuzzi with some vino, alas… tomorrow beckons…
Doomsayers Beware, a Bright Future Beckons
By JOHN TIERNEY Published: May 17, 2010
“The first school despairs because it foresees inevitable ruin. The second school is hopeful — but only because these intellectuals foresee ruin, too, and can hardly wait for the decadent modern world to be replaced by one more to their liking. Every now and then, someone comes along to note that society has failed to collapse and might go on prospering, but the notion is promptly dismissed in academia as happy talk from a simpleton.
“Empires bought stability at the price of creating a parasitic court; monotheistic religions bought social cohesion at the expense of a parasitic priestly class; nationalism bought power at the expense of a parasitic military; socialism bought equality at the price of a parasitic bureaucracy; capitalism bought efficiency at the price of parasitic financiers.”
Progress this century could be impeded by politics, wars, plagues or climate change, but Dr. Ridley argues that, as usual, the “apocaholics” are overstating the risks and underestimating innovative responses.
“The modern world is a history of ideas meeting, mixing, mating and mutating,” Dr. Ridley writes. “And the reason that economic growth has accelerated so in the past two centuries is down to the fact that ideas have been mixing more than ever before.”
But with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, Dr. Ridley expects bottom-up innovators to prevail. His prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.”
Search FT com
Friday May 21 2010
UK government spending
Prepare for age of austerity, says Laws
By George Parker and Chris Giles
Published: May 21 2010 22:24 | Last updated: May 21 2010 22:24
The Liberal Democrat minister in charge of Britain’s biggest postwar spending squeeze has said he is ready to make “aggressive” cuts to bring down the £163bn budget deficit, admitting the choice lies between “the unpalatable and the disastrous”.
David Laws, Treasury chief secretary, will on Monday set out £6bn of savings this year, but told the Financial Times that this was just a start. “We are moving from an age of plenty to an age of austerity in the public finances,” he said.
In his first newspaper interview since moving to the Treasury, Mr Laws said he was “mentally prepared for getting a lot of representations from angry people” as the cuts begin in earnest next year.
…