November 8, 2010

Bits Bucket For November 8, 2010

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here




RSS feed | Trackback URI

480 Comments »

Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 03:51:10

Bernanke Defends Bond Purchases, Predicts Stronger Growth

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank must focus on the U.S. rather than overseas economies when trying to spur the recovery by purchasing an additional $600 billion in Treasuries.

“Our first objective, the first goal that we have, is to meet our mandate to get price stability and maximum employment in the United States,” Bernanke said yesterday in response to questions from college students in Jacksonville, Florida. “A strong U.S. economy, a recovering economy, is critical not just for Americans but it’s also critical for the global recovery.”

Bernanke came under fire yesterday from officials in Germany, China, and Brazil, who said his plan to pump cash into the banking system may jar other economies and fail to fuel U.S. growth. Critics including Michael Burry, the former hedge-fund manager who predicted the housing market’s plunge, have said Fed policy is encouraging investors to take on too much risk and threatens to undermine the dollar.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-11-08 09:46:40

This is what I was suggesting some time back: that Bernanke is blowing liquidity/potential-inflation into our leaky balloon here at home, but much of it leaks out to go elsewhere; when too much of it ends up in one place, it produces inflation there, not here. I believe this is the cause of the emerging inflation we’re seeing in emerging markets.

 
Comment by Jerry
2010-11-08 11:03:08

Is this the same man that missed the housing bubble and said the “sub prime market was contained” ? One can only wonder what his” staff of 250 full time PHD’s do all day” looking at the market conditions and determines what causes economic conditions? God help us all!

Comment by bulwark
2010-11-08 20:53:53

“missed” the housing bubble… They knew all along but like any Ponzi scam they got in too deep to deny it.

Imagine if Greenspan told the truth, “Sure, I saw it coming…”

Torches and pitchforks.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 11:19:00

Where’s Lint? Silver is up nicely today and no sign of him / her.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2010-11-08 13:47:04

Bernanke needs to be relieved of his duties immediately. His policies are reckless and dangerous, and are designed to grow the wealth of the 1%’ers, while sending tens of millions of others into poverty.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 14:51:32

Nov. 8, 2010, 4:45 p.m. EST
Fed says Congress needs better growth plan
Central bankers urge tax, regulatory reforms, pro-trade policy
By Jeffry Bartash, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Top Federal Reserve officials on Monday said the central bank has done everything it can to help a weak U.S. economy. The rest is up to Congress and the White House.

In separate speeches, three senior Fed executives said Washington needs to fashion better tax and regulatory policies that encourage businesses to invest in the U.S. and create jobs. They said there is little else the Fed can do to boost domestic growth.

“It is absolutely imperative that the Congress and the president attack the long-run budget problems the nation faces,” St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said in a speech to Wall Street financial analysts in New York.

Fed Board member Kevin Warsh, who spoke at the same event, concurred.

Sarah Palin says she’s deeply concerned about the Federal Reserve’s plan to buy $600 billion of U.S. bonds to boost the economy.

“The Federal Reserve cannot and should not do it alone,” he said. “Other policymakers must bear their burden and do their part to encourage more-robust economic growth and establish the conditions for stronger employment.”

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 15:21:07

three senior Fed executives said Washington needs to fashion better tax and regulatory policies that encourage businesses to invest in the U.S. and create jobs.

Well I’ll be darned.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 20:09:30

I said that 5 years ago .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 20:47:01

If Congress actually does something constructive, it would make evident it had the power all along, and they can no longer deflect their responsibility for not doing something earlier.

Congress: The government of last resort.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 03:52:30

“The true purpose of ‘Quantitative Easing” is to disguise the decreasing ability of the Treasury to finance its debts.” ~Peter Schiff

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 05:17:37

“The true purpose of ‘Quantitive Easing’ is to disguise the decreasing ability of the Treasury to finance its debts.”

… because there is a SHORTAGE OF MONEY.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-11-08 07:25:22

You have that right cash is hard to come by today….everyone is selling nobody is buying except at crackhead prices

 
 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2010-11-08 05:20:58

Sorry, Mate. Peter is wrong. Our man Ben tells us what it’s all about:

“Stock prices rose and long-term interest rates fell when investors began to anticipate the most recent action. Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.”

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Washington Post 11/4/2010

You see……. It’s all about the “virtuous cycle” of lending and expansion. There is no “vicious cycle”, so long as Ben can keep the money supply increasing and flowing into the economy. I also have a bridge in Brooklyn that I’d like to sell you.

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 05:34:17

“There is no ‘vicious cycle’, so long as Ben can keep the money supply increasing and flowing into the economy. I also have a bridge in Brooklyn that I’d like to sell you.”

I don’t want to buy a bridge but the Chineese might because THEY HAVE THE MONEY and they might want to buy the bridge for the RAW MATERIAL that it is made from.

The Chineese have the money (and we don’t) because we sent it to them.

“Ben can keep the money supply increasing and flowing into the economy”… and flowing right out again where it will end up in Chindia.

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 05:43:36

“and flowing right out again where it will end up in Chindia.”

Like we flowed our prezzy right out to Chindia.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 06:04:24

Greenspan spoke like a lunatic. Nothing he said was inteligible. People thought him a genius. Bernanke actually crafts whole sentences that are inteligible, but so blantantly preposterous because the meaning is clear but so so wrong.

Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2010-11-08 06:27:39

I don’t know what People you are talking about. I, for one, have always referred to him as a moron. If you mean the TIME MAGAZINE propaganda about being the “Maestro”, then you can see just how reliable they are as a source of information.
Check out the editorial board of TIME. You will see they are buddies of the FED and Wallstreet, a talking-piece for Misinformation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 07:06:45

“Wallstreet”

Washstreet. Wallington.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 07:06:25

I once saw a political cartoon with a simple line drawing depicting Maestro Greenspan at his famous Congressional hearing table, with the words in the word bubble:

“Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And thy rate interest were to raise 25 basis points.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-11-08 09:49:21

That’s AWESOME! :-)

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 10:52:10

You had me at: “itta’sa conumbdrum” ;-)

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 15:36:14

Brilliant.

 
 
Comment by roger
2010-11-08 09:55:18

Greenspan is a biological egocentric entity in a state of supreme infintile dependence and security

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 07:12:58

Well stock prices rise because of anticipated “financial inflation,” and not improved profitibility in the actual “making stuff and doing things for people” part of the economy.

 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 07:14:54

“Stock prices rose and long-term interest rates fell when investors began to anticipate the most recent action. Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.”

Low mortgage rates only make housing more affordable if you assume that downpayment requirements remain almost zero. Can you imagine what he would think if Congress actually got rid of enough of the GSEs so that the majority of lending would have to go back to traditional underwriting standards with 20% downpayments that the borrower had to prove they saved themselves (not received as a gift)? And I have no idea what he means about rising stock prices making people more confident. Price to earnings ratios of 22 with 10% unemployment is not a confidence booster for rational people.

On another note, NPR had a very brief interview with the head of the NY Fed this morning since they are broadcasting their money show from NYC this week (I think they are usually out of LA for some unknown reason). When asked if there was anything he disliked about New York, the man said that he wished housing were more affordable. The real world is amazing. You can’t imagine that sort of head exploding irony.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-11-08 09:52:05

“And I have no idea what he means about rising stock prices making people more confident.”

I actually do see this among some in my circle; a higher DJIA leads them to assume that all must be well in the business world.

I try to eductate them that recently this is just the exact same “value” being applied to the business, but that it is priced in weaker dollars. Some get it, some don’t.

Math is hard.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 07:47:13

BB said
“higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending”

Yes but higher food and energy prices and little to no return on safe investments will cut spending. He didn’t seem to mention this.

“Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment”

So far companies are just sitting on the cash waiting for the inevitable crash I imagine.

Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 14:24:52

“higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending”

He wants to replace the Wealth Effect from HELOC’s with the Wealth Effect from the DOW. I don’t think that the consumer is going to fall for it this time. FB’s aren’t going to extract $150K from their 401K just to get a boob job, that’s for sure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 15:41:11

Do FBs still HAVE $150K just lying around?

Once again they have mistaken the map for the terrain. The very people needed to boost consumerism, don’t have substantial holdings of stocks. And those did, have ALREADY spent it or at the very least, the discretionary part.

It’s all about JOBS. JOBS. JOBS. JOBS.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 15:59:42

FBs still HAVE $150k just lying around? :lol:

 
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 07:01:03

One business show guest suggested it was to shake loose the Chinese peg to the dollar. Hmmm. Anyone have any comments on that one?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:16:52

A Chinese pegleg!,…arrrgggghh sink that Junk & all she holds me matey! ;-)

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 15:52:08

Your junk-fu is superior!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 08:09:31

Why would anything that makes the Chinese angry cause them to do something that we want them to do?

Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 09:10:20

Now I’m picturing the Chinese as Richard Bannister, “Don’t make me angry, you wouldn’t like me when I’m angry.” The problem is that in THIS co-dependent relationship, WE’RE the irresponsible drunk and THEY’RE the enabling gold-digger wife.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MrBubble
2010-11-08 17:03:18

Do you mean David Banner?

I think that Bannister is the Brit who ran the 4 min mile first…

 
Comment by ahansen
2010-11-09 00:28:04

Roger Bannister.

 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-09 05:36:40

oops.

 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2010-11-08 08:17:36

I agree. It’s about trade.

This is all a message that if the rest of the world keeps buying our debt to keep the U.S. the buyer of first, last and only resort, they will be paid back in diminished money.

 
Comment by yensoy
2010-11-08 10:05:48

That’s been my theory for a while. Shameless plug below:

Comment by yensoy
2009-08-29 08:56:35
The mistake Argentina made was in projecting their currency to be stronger than it really was. The dollar peg was never workable, especially at a time when the US economy was actually quite resilient.

The US is fundamentally different because the US doesn’t peg its dollar to anybody else. If at all, it’s the other way around. Look at China and its regulated exchange rate. It’s like China is tailgating the US. US wants to desperately shake off the tailgator. So it reduces its speed (interest rate) close to zero yet the tailgator doesn’t doesn’t get bothered enough to overtake. China so far has shown a limitless appetite for buying poorly paying US dollar debt, and has refrained from making any big changes to its dollar peg.

If that changes, there will be two outcomes. US interest rates will move sharply upwards(*) and the RMB will increase in value with respect to the dollar. The latter is somewhat of a desirable outcome for the US - Chinese imports will be more expensive and US exports more competitive - hopefully these together will reduce the trade gap. The first outcome may also be something that the US can absorb given that a substantial portion of US debt obligations are held by US based parties so in effect the gainers will be more US based than foreign.

(*)this assumes there is no further sleigh-of-hand “stated interest” deals between the Treasury and the Fed.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 13:09:42

Thanks for pulling that back up, yensoy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 07:39:47

Schiff also said Bernanke has been wrong all along.

Watching Bernanke in this video, Schiff appears to be right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpD64GUoXw

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-11-08 07:52:29

You can listen to peter live on the radio 6-8 pm m-f

http://wstcwnlk.com

Then my guy Larry Shiller is on from 8-10 Mondays…

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 03:54:59

Calif borrows $40M a day to pay unemployment

With one in every eight workers unemployed and empty state coffers, California is borrowing billions of dollars from the federal government to pay unemployment insurance.

The Los Angeles Times reports that the state owes $8.6 billion already, and will have to come up with a $362-million payment to Washington by the end of next September.

The continued borrowing means federal unemployment insurance taxes are going to increase, upping the annual payroll costs $21 a year per worker.

California tops the list of 32 states that have borrowed a total of $41 billion to pay claims.

The state took out its first loan from the federal government early last year, to deal with rising payment of benefits and number of claims.

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 05:18:50

Still more evidence of a SHORTAGE OF MONEY.

Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2010-11-08 05:31:44

combo,

that sounds vaguely reminiscent of that “SHORTAGE OF LAND” story that we were hearing in Miami, Las Vegas, Collier County Florida and various other places around the country.

As we now see, there never was a “shortage of land”. There was an abundant oversupply of CREDIT that allowed people to bid up prices, as though they really had the MONEY to buy the property at the prices they bid.

Unfortunately, this sent signals to the government bureaucrats that we had a SURPLUS of money and they dutifully raised all government spending and employee benefits to rake in their “fair share”. It was a false signal, but the DEBTS accrued are real. It’s not a shortage of Money. It’s an overburden of DEBT. Cancel the contracts.
Cut back on services. Fold up the tents and send the circus back home. We are headed for the trough of the rollercoaster ride. It’s gonna take a lot of energy to get the train back up to the top of the rails before we can coast back down. Maybe we should ditch the FED and try a Merry-go-round ride, instead.
All this uP and DowN MovEmenT is MakINg me SiCk.

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 05:42:05

“It’s not a shortage of Money. It’s an overburden of DEBT. Cancel the contracts.”

Do you mean cancel the debts? One person’s debt is another person’s money. Cancel a debt and somebody on the wrong end of this cancellation gets hosed.

Cancel all or part of pension or Social Security payments and the receipiants get hosed. Getting hosed means they will not receive money that was promised, which will mean they will end up being SHORT OF MONEY.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 06:01:18

The Rain Makers are not trying to create a deluge. They are concentrating the rain on the Titans. Not all will survive, but the race of Titans will be preserved. If small fish in the tributaries perish for want of water, well that is just a cost of doing business.

 
Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 06:02:09

Cancelling a debt won’t releive a shortage of money, it will just pass the money shortage from one end of the transaction to the other end of the transaction.

 
Comment by clark
2010-11-08 07:52:52

Combo’s argument is always limited. When the payments to Social Security are cut off, he doesn’t mention the Other side of the trade as well, the taxpayers from whom the money is taken From, it is they who will have an Increase in money. But in both instances the supply of money is the same, who has it, is what changes.

Nor does he mention that his description of a shortage of money is limited to the U.S. The money supply is world wide, it’s not “local”. The money overseas Can come back, a huge wave of it causing an increase in the local supply of money resulting in further increases in prices.

 
Comment by Elanor
2010-11-08 09:24:24

If the small fish all perish, what will the Titans eat?

 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 10:04:08

“he doesn’t mention the Other side of the trade as well, the taxpayers from whom the money is taken From, it is they who will have an Increase in money.”

Clark, I’d agree with you if I thought that actually paying for all the future SS obligations was priced into the market, but it isn’t. People who expect to see certain payments in the future can never see those payments and still not have any reductions in payments made by workers and their employers. This is more of a problem in corporate and state and local pensions than in Social Security.

If market makers really expected all those state, local and corporate pensions to be paid, the states and localities would be paying junk bond prices and higher for any debt at all and the stock prices of corporations with underfunded pensions would collapse from their current levels. Remember, a lot are considered underfunded already and they are using 8% as their “safe” assumption of returns. What are the annual returns (cap gains and dividends) on the S&P 500 if you go back 10 or 12 years?

 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Virginia Beach
2010-11-08 10:38:57

Enough small fish can overcome and kill a titan fish.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:04:22

“Enough small fish can overcome and kill a titan fish.”

Only if they’re hungry enough.

 
 
Comment by Rancher
2010-11-08 06:32:24

And whether we like it or not, promises made
are not going to be kept. Do the math. It’s
just simply impossible. All future expectations are going to be drastically lowered, so get used to it.

Corn up 71%
Oil up 24%
Oats up 106%
Wheat up 67%
Soy up 44%
Copper up 47%
Gold up 21%
Silver up 48%
Dollar down 16%

Since spring/summer 2010

Thanks to Karl.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 07:22:32

Exactly.
It was a false signal, but the DEBTS accrued are real. Until they are abandoned through bankruptcy or the foreclosure of non-recourse mortgage debt. I am as tired of the bankers whining about how evil homeowers are “strategicly defaulting” them as I am with borrowers who want their debts forgiven (or partially forgiven through modification or short sales) without going through bankruptcy.

We HAVE a procedure for the orderly processing of people and corporations with unpayable debt. It’s called bankruptcy. All these crazy unpayable loans have idiots on both sides of the transaction. Look figuring out who was willing and able to pay them back was SUPPOSED to be the core competency of the credit industry. Knowing how much you can afford to pay a month is something you’re SUPPOSED to be able to figure out.

Bankruptcy, it’s not the end of the world, it’s what we need to do.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:31:53

Excellent point by the way Jim A.!

figuring out who was willing and able to pay them back was SUPPOSED to be the core competency of the credit industry.

(And here Hwy thought this whole time that it was about the “appraised value” of the “easily returnable”…collateral.)

 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 08:15:45

We’re gonna need a lot more bankruptcy judges….

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 08:17:48

Tend to agree with you Jim .Can’t change the fact that a lot of bad loans were made or that there isn’t any equity to bail out the homeowner or the Bank .The question always seems to be who is
going to be bailed out or who is the loss taker . Basically all the loan investors are the Bag-holders for most part
(Banks and Investment houses were the middlemen for this mis-rated AAA paper ).No doubt the real bag-holders under standing law would sue to try to make the Middle men the bag-holders .
THe Middlemen want the taxpayer to be the primary
bag-holders of bad loans in one way or another ,not to mention the actual borrower losing the house or any money they put into the deal .
And of course the equity extractors that got the goods don’t want to pay the debt either because they expected to use real estate always goes up to pay that bill and it didn’t happen or it crashed .

 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 09:13:28

Yeah HW, the problem is that the credit industry became not so much about spotting the turds and not buying them so much as gift-wrapping them and selling them to others.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-11-08 10:26:18

“Bankruptcy, it’s not the end of the world, it’s what we need to do.”

+1 Bazillion, Jim. Well said.

“became not so much about spotting the turds and not buying them so much as gift-wrapping them and selling them to others.”

Boo-YAH! A lovely turn of phrase! You’re on a roll. :-)

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 06:13:22

“Still more evidence of a SHORTAGE OF MONEY.”

If it was merely that then wouldn’t having the Federal Reserve sending every household a check solve the problem?

“Ben can keep the money supply increasing and flowing into the economy”… and flowing right out again where it will end up in Chindia.

Now that’s the real problem, IMHO. We consume close to $1 trillion more than we produce. Contrary to the pandering statement Obama made to the Indians, offshoring does not create jobs at home.

I bought some socks over the weekend. I made sure they were made in the USA. I guess that was my little bit to keep the money at home.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:36:46

I bought some socks over the weekend. I made sure they were made in the USA. I guess that was my little bit to keep the money at home.

Bless you!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 07:50:43

Ben can keep the money supply increasing and flowing into the economy”… and flowing right out again where it will end up in Chindia

Well if they lower the value of the dollar enough then we will be able to compete with China in manufacturing. Of course the middle class will be toast.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 08:58:02

“Well if they lower the value of the dollar enough then we will be able to compete with China in manufacturing. Of course the middle class will be toast.”

Isn’t that the plan? That way the big boyz will own everything.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:06:54

You have problem with Corporate Communist Capitalism©®™, comrade?

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 07:34:30

“California is borrowing billions of dollars from the federal government”

the federal government seems to not be lacking.

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 07:56:04

“the federal government seems to not be lacking”

I just now googled-up “national debt clock” and this clock told me the Federal government is $13,695,981,355,725 in debt.

I’d say the Federal Government is lacking.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 14:29:13

More like a shortage of JOBS. Say, instead of collecting $350/week in unemployment, that person contributed $350/week in taxes (about a $62K job at 30%). California would GAIN 40M a day instead of borrowing it.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:09:02

62K? Don’t make me larf! More like 18k jobs. At best.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 05:12:11

Taking on a Second Mortgage to Pay the Foreclosure LawyerBy DAVID STREITFELD
Published: November 6, 2010

For some Florida residents, the price of getting out of foreclosure will include taking on a second mortgage — payable this time to their lawyers.

The new mortgage, which takes effect only if the foreclosure is dismissed and the homeowner’s debt to the bank is reduced, is controversial among defense lawyers, some of whom call it “creepy” and “crass.” Yet even they acknowledge it offers a solution to a vexing question: How do they get paid?

“We thought, ‘Why don’t we use a bit of ingenuity to find an affordable way to represent them?’ ” said Peter Ticktin of the Ticktin Law Group in Deerfield Beach, Fla. “It’s a new model, a new paradigm.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/business/07lawyers.html

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 07:00:33

Yep, Florryduh’s just full of new paradigms and innovators.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 07:33:56

I dunno, this seems a lot less crass and creepy than ambulance chasers who take cases on contingency and/or take a % of the settlement.

The question is, what idiot bank would approve a second mortgage to an FB who had just sqeaked out of a foreclosure* of the first mortgage? :roll:

—————
*presumably based on the robo-signer technicality, not based on the Fb’s income/assets.

Comment by polly
2010-11-08 07:59:05

I read the article. It isn’t getting the money from a second mortgage from a bank. The lawyer himself gets the second mortgage if he is successful in the case (getting the foreclosure stopped and getting the existing morgage reduced). The lawyers are going to get their shirts handed to them. If the house doens’t increase in value over the reduced mortgage note they get for the client, then they have nothing at all backing their note. They are essentially etending unsecured credit to their clients.

Not the world’s best business model, but if there isn’t any other paid work to do, then I suppose it is better than nothing at all.

Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 08:24:08

I concur. They’re not likely to make much in most of these cases, and will be end up line behind other creditors when many of these FBs re-default.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 08:52:01

Regular bankruptcy lawyers have it better. It’s not my area, but I recall being told that bankruptcy lawyer fees are not dischargeable in bankruptcy. They may probably get paid eventually.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:08:03

I thought you had to pay upfront?

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 09:17:11

I thought you had to pay upfront?

Last time I consulted with an attorney (for a matter other than BK), I did have to pay up front.

 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 09:50:11

I’m not sure about the up front thing for individuals, but I believe that in corporate bankruptcies the judges essentially make the lawyers fees (up to the amount the judge approves) senior to the other unsecured debt. The idea is that without the lawyers, you can’t have the system at all. The fees to the lawyers are considered a cost that the other creditors have to bear to get their hands on the rest of the corporation’s assets.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 10:32:15

I could never understand personal bankruptcy attorneys - they seem doomed to failure. My sister (you’ve heard a lot about her over the years) declared bankruptcy about eight years ago after her divorce. The way we found out about it was when she stiffed her divorce attorney and bankruptcy lawyer and they tried to get the money from my dad and me. I ignored their letters. My dad paid some money to the divorce attorney.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:46:18

I thought that BK lawyers require payment in advance?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 05:32:37

Ron Paul to revolutionize monetary policy. Wow, I really hope he’s able to accomplish something.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/40013227

Comment by polly
2010-11-08 07:30:38

Revolutionizing the way that particular subcommittee works isn’t the same as doing all that much with monetary policy. The article didn’t even say he would be the chair of the subcommittee, just that his office announced that it was likely he would be. The article mentioned three items he wants to do.

1) I’m not sure if he can open the Feds books just at the committee level. It might require an act of the full Congress. Possible, but not a slam dunk.

2) He certainly can call all sorts of hearings, but he can’t make bank executives testify against themselves under oath, so the hearings might not be as spectacular as hoped for.

3) Putting the US back on the gold standard has about as much chance of becoming reality as I have of winning the lottery. Since I don’t play the lottery, I think you can figure out my prediction on that one.

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 07:40:05

Party pooper.

Comment by polly
2010-11-08 08:08:14

Sorry. I occasionally get to/have to/am vounteered to sit in a Congressional hearing to take notes and write up an e-mail about what happened. Maybe I’ve just been unlucky, but the spectacular revelations just haven’t been all that forthcoming. The most exciting moment is generally when I cut to the front of the line to make sure I am on the list to sit in the reserved seats. If the reservation got lost I have to flash around my ID and business card and insist that the micro junior staffers let me in early so I can sit down. Seriously, that is as exciting as it gets.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 08:25:25

Seriously, that is as exciting as it gets.

And polly is correct.

Speaking from the photographer’s perspective, these meetings aren’t exactly what we consider to be opportunities for creative work.

Imagine having to plant your butt on the floor for hours as you look up at the people holding the hearing or testifying. You get your shot, which looks pretty much like anyone else’s, and that’s the job you do for that day.

 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 07:41:33

“he can’t make bank executives testify against themselves under oath”

Isn’t there a clever game of giving immunity to force testimony?

Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 08:27:05

Worked well for Ollie North…Turns out that even congress can’t ignore the 5th ammendment to the constitution.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:09:46

Of course, it won’t apply in the civil trials that follow.

 
 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 08:53:21

Can you imagine Ron Paul giving blanket immunity to all the senior executives of Goldman or Countrywide or Citibank or AIG for anything they say before the committee? I can’t. Not even if there isn’t any chance of really prosecuting them for anything. I could be wrong on this one, but I can’t see it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 10:40:27

Ron Paul has been an outcast and somewhat of a joke in congress for many years. I wonder why his son was easily elected to the senate first time out. And I consider the son to be a pale imitation of his father, given his support of increased Medicare payments to physicians. Ron Paul, purist that he is, doesn’t participate in Medicare.

I may have answered my own question. The son can be bought. The father, not so much.

 
 
Comment by whyoung
2010-11-08 09:52:31

They’ve tried that with some underworld types.
They just choose to to jail for refusing to testify.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2010-11-08 11:06:29

I imagine the witness protection program doesn’t do much good when you have testified before congress.

 
 
 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 07:53:16

LONDON (Reuters) – Leading economies should consider adopting a modified global gold standard to guide currency rates, World Bank president Robert Zoellick said on Monday in a surprise proposal before a potentially acrimonious G20 summit.

Writing in the Financial Times, Zoellick called for a “Bretton Woods II” system of floating currencies as a successor to the Bretton Woods fixed-exchange rate regime that broke down in the early 1970s.

The former U.S. trade representative, who served in several Republican administrations, said such a move “is likely to need to involve the dollar, the euro, the yen, the pound and (a yuan) that moves toward internationalization and then an open capital account.

“The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values,” he added.

Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 08:03:14

“The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values,” he added.

Seems it already is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 09:05:06

Is the Fed part of the executive branch, or the legislative branch?

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 09:11:13

Is the Fed part of the executive branch, or the legislative branch?

It’s part of the more important banking branch.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:44:05

AKA, the “shadow” government.

 
 
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 09:53:29

Neither. But it is subject to some limited legislative oversight. As far as I know, there is no executive branch department or agency that oversees the Fed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:14:02

It really is its own branch.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 05:35:58

Ohio GMAC Foreclosure Case May Set Anti-Wall Street Precedent

When James Renfro had to stop making payments on his two-story fixer-upper in Parma, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland, he triggered events that were supposed to result in the forced sale of his home.

That Nov. 15 auction has been canceled because of defects in documents submitted by his loan servicer, Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit. Two affidavits about Renfro’s home were signed by Jeffrey Stephan, a GMAC employee who said in sworn depositions in Florida and Maine that he hadn’t read thousands of affidavits he’d signed.

Renfro’s case has created a showdown between GMAC and Ohio’s Attorney General Richard Cordray. Cordray has asked Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Nancy Russo not to let GMAC simply submit new documents to cure defects without consequences. He’s taken the same stand against Wells Fargo & Co., which has said it found defects in 55,000 foreclosures.

“This is just the first,” said Cordray, who has filed an amicus or friend-of-the-court brief in the Renfro case. The judge will consider Cordray’s views today in Cleveland. Cordray will ask Russo to punish GMAC, the fourth-largest U.S. mortgage lender, for its conduct, he said in an interview.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 06:32:01

“This is just the first,”

…and not a moment too soon.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-11-08 07:04:18

I don’t think it’s fair for us to penalize the banks for not following the law. The banks would never penalize us if we were, say, a little late on a payment or something.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 07:17:33

Cordray has asked Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Nancy Russo not to let GMAC simply submit new documents to cure defects without consequences.

I asked this question last week. Could the mortgage servicer/bank show up in court and resubmit the paperwork, with proper knowledge of the case? The answer was that there was no double jeopardy so yes they could.

Are there ‘consquences’ built into failing to follow the regulation, or is the court case itself the consequence? Is this like a simple People’s Court-type case where the defendent (the bank) “wins?” Was the bank negligent in robo-signing? What about the FB, who was negligent in payments? Maybe the most Cordray can hope for is that the two negligences cancel out.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-11-08 07:33:20

Signing false affidavits is a crime, as is devising a scheme that involves it. That should become a separate issue from the banks’ ability (or the lack thereof) to produce the proper paperwork to allow them to foreclose.

Whether or not the FB can make his payments should have no bearing on either, as it is a wholly separate issue, too.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-11-08 07:50:23

Yeah the law is the law alpha, if it was hundreds of people instead of hundreds of thousands I would agree but i feel robbed by having to scrimp to pay the rent each month while they keep coming up with ways to spend taxpayer money and keep them in their “homes”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-11-08 07:36:07

That’s really all it is…giving wall street the middle finger for this crisis

I wish I could quit paying rent for a few months or have someone pay down my CC but then i am a lowly renter, and these home liars are living free saving their payments and having a nice cash cushion….

———-HAH they are probably spending every last cent of this ill gotten gains on lawyers, bling and iphones, and will whine profusely to the newbie chicky-poo “reporter” about how they have no money to move and the sheriff is coming tomorrow to toss their stuff to the curb.

Set Anti-Wall Street Precedent

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 10:45:00

Why did the servicer stop the auction? I don’t get that. You’d expect the houseowner to initiate that action.

Of course, it’s a fixer and might not be habitable, so maybe the FB really wanted to walk away. How ironic is that?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 05:43:27

Zoellick seeks gold standard debate
By Alan Beattie, FT.com
November 7, 2010 8:07 p.m. EST
Robert Zoellick says the system of floating currencies has broken down.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Leading economies should consider readopting a modified global gold standard
* World Bank president made the comments in an op-ed written for the Financial Times
* This week’s G-20 meeting is likely to see yet more exchange rate conflict
* A U.S. plan for countries to sign up to current account targets has run into widespread opposition

(FT) — Leading economies should consider readopting a modified global gold standard to guide currency movements, argues the president of the World Bank.

Writing in the Financial Times, Robert Zoellick, the bank’s president since 2007, says a successor is needed to what he calls the “Bretton Woods II” system of floating currencies that has held since the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate regime broke down in 1971.

Mr Zoellick, a former US Treasury official, calls for a system that “is likely to need to involve the dollar, the euro, the yen, the pound and a renminbi that moves towards internationalisation and then an open capital account”. He adds: “The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values.”

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 06:58:15

“The system should also consider employing gold absorbed sunlight as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency valuessurviving for the next 3 Billion years” ;-)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 05:48:40

Is law and order really on its way back in the banking industry, or is this just more lobbyist-regulator Grand Kabuki?

* BUSINESS
* NOVEMBER 8, 2010

Which Firms Need Tougher Oversight? Don’t Look at Me
By VICTORIA MCGRANE

WASHINGTON—Companies across the financial-services industry are aggressively seeking to avoid being subjected to tougher regulation—and to make sure their competitors are.

At issue is a new regulatory designation created by Congress’s overhaul of finance rules earlier this year, in which firms classified as “systemically important” would have to comply with additional rules and submit to oversight from the Federal Reserve.

Life insurers, hedge funds and asset managers are pelting regulators with arguments for being exempt. On the other side, outside groups as well as some from within the financial-services industry are lobbying to have these very firms and others subject to the new regime.

Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 07:37:50

How is “systemically important” different from too-big-to-fail, i.e. “monopoly?”

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 08:14:30

More politically correct term?

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-11-08 11:16:18

So if you’re not considered ’systemically important’, does that mean that you will be ineligible to receive any type of federal bailout? If so, then the regulation is working quite well.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 05:56:38

Does the Treasury’s foreclosure rescue plan, as offered and executed by Megabank, Inc, pretty much amount to a scam to trick people who were current on their mortgages into underpaying so they could be foreclosed?

Megabank, Inc = masters of financial tricks and cheats

Homeowners Say Loan Mods Led Them To Foreclosure
by The Associated Press
LOS ANGELES November 7, 2010, 03:08 pm ET

Grocery store owners William and Esperanza Casco were making enough money to stay current on their mortgage, but when JPMorgan Chase & Co. offered a plan that reduced their payments, they figured they could use the extra cash and signed up.

The Cascos say they never missed a subsequent payment, so they were horrified when the bank decided the smaller payments weren’t enough and foreclosed on their modest Long Beach home.

Their story is echoed across the country by people who claim — some in lawsuits — that banks didn’t live up to their end of the deal when they agreed to trial mortgage modifications.

The suits add to a feeling among many struggling homeowners that they’re getting little help from the part of the government’s $700 billion Wall Street rescue that aimed to help them directly.

Indeed, Treasury statistics show that only about one-third of the nearly 1.4 million homeowners accepted into the government’s payment reduction program over the past year have had their reductions made permanent.

It is extremely unfair that someone like me and my wife who have owned our home for 17 years and never missed a payment could end up in foreclosure,” Casco, 47, said in Spanish through an interpreter.

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 06:56:31

“It is extremely unfair that someone like me and my wife who have owned our home for 17 years and never missed a payment could end up in foreclosure,” Casco, 47, said in Spanish through an interpreter.

Wah-wah-wah 17 years in the country and he can’t be bothered to speak the language. Oooooh, it’s so UNFAIR! Tell it to LaRaza.

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 07:09:12

And what’s really unfair is how you can own a home for 17 years and make the payments Ok and then presto! Foreclosure!

That usually only happens to lazy, greedy Americans who max out their equity. Oh, wait….

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 10:52:35

Correct, Palmy. They left out the cash-out refinance part. If they owned the house for 17 years and paid down the mortgage they would have a low, affordable payment based on the price of the house 17 years ago, or they would have so much equity that they could easily sell it. What a bunch of crap.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 13:21:05

I agree there’s somthing missing. ‘Cause if they had been making 17 years of ammortizing payments they WOULDN’T be underwater now, and their payments would be more affordable than when they started, barring job-loss or medical issues.

 
 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 10:50:20

Palmy, my dear Japanese mother has been away from her native land for 57 years, and none of us (except one of my sons) speaks Japanese, yet she has a really hard time making herself understood in English. Some people have no knack for languages.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 11:11:24

yet she has a really hard time making herself understood in English.

That’s OK if she’s in California. How’s her Spanish?

Some people have no knack for languages.

I think I have half a knack.

Half the Brazilians tell my my Portuguese is really good and half say it is pretty bad.

But what I find funny is this. I’ve been listening to bad, broken, garbled, messed up, pigeon English spoken by foreigners for a long time and I can understand most of it. Heck, sometimes it’s even fun. However a lot of Brazilians can’t even come CLOSE to understanding messed up Portuguese. Maybe I need a translator.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 11:52:39

LOL, Rio. We all have been translating my mom’s English for years! I understand her perfectly, if nobody else can.

When she speaks Japanese to her sisters or my son, her voice is transformed from her strained English voice to a musical Japanese voice. She’s quite a gal.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2010-11-08 12:42:51

My nana moved here from Italy when she was 17 years old. She died in the 80’s, and spoke English her whole life.

Problem was, no outside the family had any idea what she was saying. They thought she was speaking an entirely different language. She was a funny lady.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 13:34:27

My nana moved here from Italy when she was 17 years old. She died in the 80’s, and spoke English her whole life.

When I a-lived in a-Pittsburgh, I a-rented a room from an Italian lady. It took-a awhile to understand-a what she was saying.

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2010-11-08 13:43:04

This one is really rich. The couple inherited a paid-off property, then *somehow* ended up with a 1st and 2nd.

http://tinyurl.com/2un6mke

“Scott says she and her husband refinanced their first mortgage and took out a home equity line in 2007. They used the money to modernize the historic residence and grow their construction business. Scott, who’s always been resourceful, juggling several jobs at one time, says when they took out the loan, they never saw the bust coming.has been in her husband’s family for three generations…

“Watching her bank account drain, Scott couldn’t shake the feeling of impending doom. But that didn’t stop the 51-year-old and her husband from fighting to keep their five-acre property, which Scott’s husband, Dale Frey, received the property off Mullan Road as a family gift, and today it houses the couple, three cats, several chickens, a black lab named Zoey, and llamas that graze in the yard….”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:41:47

“They used the money to modernize the historic residence and grow their construction business”

There’s that red flag: construction business.

There was a letter to the editor in our local rag where a construction guy was whining about how he used to make well over 100K a year and now isbarely pulling in 40K.

They really thought that the income was sustainable.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 15:46:48

There’s that red flag: construction business.

There was a letter to the editor in our local rag where a construction guy was whining about how he used to make well over 100K a year and now isbarely pulling in 40K.

Trouble with a lot of people in construction is that, when times are good, they go hog-wild with all sorts of silly spending. Not just at home, but in the business too.

Then, when things slow down, they’re really hurting.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:25:40

Exactly Slim. Been there, seen that.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 09:28:19

But at some level, they DID miss full payments. The “trial modification” program IS a period of forebearance and partial payments. What did they do with the money that they weren’t paying? Could they use that to become current? If they are truely able to afford their mortgage, they should be able to make payments. I don’t even understand why they were offered a trial modification if they were current and able to make their payments. These stories always leave a ton of unanswered questions.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-11-08 13:21:41

I think the problem is the reporters take the FBs version of events at face value, and never ask reasonable follow-up questions. Like: ‘Why did they give you a trial modification if you were current on your payments?’ .

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:27:57

It the news game. They may very well have done the follow-up, but the editor cut the story to fit the company’s agenda-of-the-week as determined by the owners.

This happens every. Single. Day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 06:00:37

Regulators flawed in foreclosure oversight

During the housing boom, millions of homeowners got easy access to mortgages. Now, some mortgage lenders and government officials are taking action after discovering that many mortgage documents were mishandled.

By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 8, 2010; 12:02 AM

As foreclosures began to mount across the country three years ago, a group of state bank regulators suspected that some borrowers might be losing their homes unnecessarily. So the state officials asked the biggest national banks for details about their foreclosure operations.

When two banks - J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo - declined to cooperate, the state officials asked the banks’ federal regulator for help, according to a letter they sent. But the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees national banks, denied the states’ request, saying the firms should answer only to inquiries from federal officials. In a response to state officials, John Dugan, comptroller at the time, wrote that his agency was already planning to collect foreclosure information and that any additional monitoring risked “confusing matters.”

But even as it closed the door on state oversight, the OCC chose itself not to scrutinize the foreclosure operations of the largest national banks, forgoing any examination of their procedures and paperwork. Instead, the agency relied on the banks’ in-house assessments. These provided no hint of the problems to come until they had tripped the nation’s housing market, agency officials later acknowledged.

Based on what we were seeing and what we were concerned about, it felt like a chronic underreaction at the federal level,” said John Ryan, a senior official with the Conference of State Bank Supervisors.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 06:04:44

Number of the Week: $10.2 Trillion in Global Borrowing ~ WSJ

$10.2 trillion: The amount of money advanced-nation governments will need to borrow in 2011

As the debts of advanced countries rise to levels not seen since the aftermath of World War II, it’s hard to know how much is too much. But it’s easy to see that the risk of serious financial trouble is growing.

Next year, fifteen major developed-country governments, including the U.S., Japan, the U.K., Spain and Greece, will have to raise some $10.2 trillion to repay maturing bonds and finance their budget deficits, according to estimates from the International Monetary Fund. That’s up 7% from this year, and equals 27% of their combined annual economic output.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 09:48:29

Fire up the printing presses!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:31:00

It’s been said that the labor of every man, women and child on this planet for the next 30 years has been borrowed against by the PTB.

SERF’S UP!

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 16:33:45

It’s been said that the labor of every man, women and child on this planet for the next 30 years has been borrowed against by the PTB.

If we choose to let it stand.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 20:46:04

Pipe down! Big Brother Dancing with the Survivor Idlol is on!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 06:06:59

The age of the dollar is drawing to a close
Currency competition is the only way to fix the world economy, says Jeremy Warner.

Right from the start of the financial crisis, it was apparent that one of its biggest long-term casualties would be the mighty dollar, and with it, very possibly, American economic hegemony. The process would take time – possibly a decade or more – but the starting gun had been fired.

At next week’s meeting in Seoul of the G20’s leaders, there will be no last rites – this hopelessly unwieldy exercise in global government wouldn’t recognise a corpse if stood before it in a coffin – but it seems clear that this tragedy is already approaching its denouement.

To understand why, you have to go back to the origins of the credit crunch, which lay in the giant trade and capital imbalances that have long ruled the world economy. Over the past 20 years, the globe has become divided in highly dangerous ways into surplus and deficit nations: those that produced a surplus of goods and savings, and those that borrowed the savings to buy the goods.

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 06:20:26

“Over the past 20 years, the globe has become divided in highly dangerous ways into suprlus and deficit nations: those that produced a surplus of goods and savings, and those that borrowed the savings to buy the goods.”

Which means one group of nations transfered its wealth to the other group of nations.

Dollars that left the US are claims on US assets. Whoever has the dollars gets to call the shots when it comes to deals involving dollars. This is true within the confines of the US and it is true outside the confines of the US, as we are beginning to find out.

Comment by clark
2010-11-08 08:38:21

“Whoever has the dollars”

Exactly, the ever increasing supply of Dollars.

 
 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 09:23:18

It is interesting to note that in the credit bubble whose bursting caused the Great Depression, the US was the big creditor and producer, but in the runup to the Great Recession, we were the big debtor and consumer.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-11-08 13:22:18

Which suggests that our role in and how we are affected by this depression will be different from that one. I wonder how things will go for China playing our old role?

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:32:58

It’s interesting in the same way as being thrown under the bus.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 21:18:15

LOL ecofeco ….you don’t know how funny you are some times .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 06:08:09

California renters who are struggling to keep up on your monthly, and California homeowners who already lost your homes to foreclosure, eat your hearts out. You are not the kind of people the Obama administration considers worthy of assistance.

California expects mortgage-aid program to begin in weeks
By Dale Kasler
dkasler@sacbee.com
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page 6B

Struggling California homeowners will have to wait several more weeks for the start of a $1.83 billion government aid program that will pay down loan balances and provide monthly cash assistance.

The “Keep Your Home California” program was supposed to begin Monday. But it’s been delayed because of logistical issues, according to officials with the California Housing Finance Agency.

The agency said the program will start on a limited basis in a few weeks and expand from there.

Diane Richardson, an agency official who’s running the program, said major technical hurdles arose because the program has been expanded since it was announced by the Obama administration in February.

We’re pushing as hard as we can,” Richardson said. “The program has more than doubled – they’re very complicated programs.

Comment by arizonadude
2010-11-08 06:37:44

moer welfare to homeowners who overbought?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-11-08 07:18:18

More punishment for savers and the fiscally responsible who sat out the housing bubble mania.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:41:48

ziiiiiiiiiiiiinggggggggggggggggggggg….. (exeter™)

Some folks seem to have experienced non-committal “AVOIDANCE ISSUES”. ;-)

http://b.saaraa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rd-sign-e1267828047806.jpg

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:13:14

No, just a quicker route to when California files bankruptcy. I applaude the politicians who are speeding this process along.

 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 11:00:14

It’s been delayed since Feb 2010? Here is a link that shows how the Obama administration provided funds in Feb 2010 for states: “Hardest Hit” funds. Apparently California has been dithering since that time on how to spend their almost two billion. I wonder what the other states did with their funds. Maybe if California dithers a little longer the administration will take back the funds.

http://www.financialstability.gov/roadtostability/hardesthitfund.html

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 12:00:40

I just took a harder look at the website. Apparently this is part of the stimulus, and the other states haven’t started spending the money either. So we HBBers can be cheered that it isn’t newly-allocated money.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-11-08 06:08:53

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-08/ohio-gmac-foreclosure-case-may-set-a-precedent-for-punishing-wall-street.html

Well looky here. The TBTF banks, having raped and pillaged the fly-over states with impunity thanks to their Republicrat top cover, are now encounterng push-back from local juries and politically ambitious AGs who are taking the opportunity for payback time. This is what happens when moral hazard and disdain for the rule of law infects a society from the top down.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 12:10:38

Call me idealistic, but I’m going to give the AGs the benefit of the doubt, giving them credit for doing something because they are tired of seeing the banksters running roughshod over the rule of law, rather than having political ambitions driving the decision making process.

(But I won’t be surprised if I’m proven wrong) :)

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:36:10

It what’s known as a “happy coincidence.”

They are doing it for BOTH reasons.

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-11-08 13:27:23

This is why I was dubious that the ‘egg recall’ was the reason out-of-state money flooded into Iowa in an unsuccessful attempt to oust their AG- who was also coincidentally taking the lead in investigating foreclosuregate. They wanted to make an example of him: ‘See, this is what happens if you go after us banksters’. Thankfully, they failed in their attempt.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 06:12:02

These firms already slowly faded away (70 years or so was it up to Fall 2008?). My prediction: Now the conferred wisdom will be to make them fade away slowly; after the recovery, their status as recession-weary survivors will bolster the case for keeping them around.

Globe Editorial
The Boston Globe
Scale Fannie and Freddie down — but don’t do so just yet
November 8, 2010

FANNIE MAE and Freddie Mac make for sweeping campaign rhetoric but tough policy decisions. While the two government-guaranteed mortgage giants loomed as villains in the Fourth District challenger Sean Bielat’s unsuccessful bid to unseat longtime incumbent Barney Frank, what to do with them is among the most complicated questions facing the new Congress.

Over time, Fannie and Freddie should cease to exist, at least in their current form, but the trick is to make them fade away only slowly. The two entities are so deeply entrenched in the nation’s real estate market that abruptly privatizing them could help cast a slowly recovering economy back into recession.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:38:38

Everything will be done to try and make them go away. After all, they’re buying the toxic waste from Wall St. and this means they know where the skeletons are buried.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 06:13:07

Zoellick seeks gold standard debate

Leading economies should consider readopting a modified global gold standard to guide currency movements, argues the president of the World Bank.

Writing in the Financial Times, Robert Zoellick, the bank’s president since 2007, says a successor is needed to what he calls the “Bretton Woods II” system of floating currencies that has held since the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate regime broke down in 1971.

Mr Zoellick, a former US Treasury official, calls for a system that “is likely to need to involve the dollar, the euro, the yen, the pound and a renminbi that moves towards internationalisation and then an open capital account”. He adds: “The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values.”

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 06:22:54

“The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values.”

Genius.

Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:14:37

Doesn’t Russia have more gold in the ground than South Africa?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 06:15:58

NAR: Record share of first-time buyers
Survey finds most buyers applied for tax credits
By Inman News, Monday, November 8, 2010.

First-time homebuyers accounted for half of all home sales from July 2009 through June 2010, according to a National Association of Realtors survey of buyers and sellers.

That’s the highest share of first-time-buyer purchases in the history of the survey, which dates back to 1981. First-time buyers responding to the survey made up 47 percent of sales in 2009.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 08:34:00

Might this have something to do with the fact that home prices have fallen to the point where (at least some of) the first-time buyers can afford them?

I put the “at least some of” in parentheses because I’m skeptical of how the first-time homebuyer tax credit will actually work out over the long run. Methinks that some of those first-timers will find that they have stretched too much.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 13:24:45

Problem is that when it rains they’re REALLY going to be underwater.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:38:42

Place looks nicer than the apartment I was living in when I was in school.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2010-11-08 14:32:54

It’s certainly nicer than being homeless in Montana.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-11-08 14:56:11

You don’t see a lot of homeless panhandlers in the northern Rockies…anywhere north of Boulder that I’ve seen. Between the harsh weather and the fact that the people you’re asking for a handout from are on their way to a job that you don’t want to do and therefore they don’t have much sympathy…

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:36:52

“You don’t see a lot of homeless panhandlers in the northern Rockies…”

Maybe its just me, but I’m seeing a lot of them at freeway offrams lately.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-11-08 15:53:55

You’re up around Loveland, right? It’s been a while since I got off the interstate there.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 06:23:30

The Next Wave Of The Irish Crisis: A Massive Mess Of Underwater Mortgages

Morgan Kelly offers a big picture look at the current state of the crisis, and argues what’s next:

The next act of the crisis will rehearse the same themes of bad loans and foreign debt, only this time as tragedy rather than farce. This time the bad loans will be mortgages, and the foreign creditor who cannot be repaid is the ECB. In consequence, the second act promises to be a good deal more traumatic than the first.

Where the first round of the banking crisis centred on a few dozen large developers, the next round will involve hundreds of thousands of families with mortgages. Between negotiated repayment reductions and defaults, at least 100,000 mortgages (one in eight) are already under water, and things have barely started.

Banks have been relying on two dams to block the torrent of defaults – house prices and social stigma – but both have started to crumble alarmingly.

Comment by arizonadude
2010-11-08 06:40:13

I really think we need to take a hard look at helping people who are underwater on thier homes, paying thier bills and cannot refinance.Lots of people are paying thier bills but cannot take advantage of these low rates.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 09:10:19

Isn’t that what the “August Surprise” was supposed to be? Automatic refi to a lower rate if you have a Freddie or Fannie orwned mortgage?

 
Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 15:28:27

Why should we help them? When the DOW was 6000 last year, I didn’t get much help to take advantage of low stock prices…

 
 
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:16:56

Prices in Ireland are pretty bizarre - those old crumbling farm houses went for millions of pounds.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 06:39:44

Now For Some “Recent Turbulence in the Mortgage Industry”
Nov. 5 2010 - 6:46 pmBy AGUSTINO FONTEVECCHIA

With all heads turned towards the equity markets after Bernanke’s announcement of more quantitative easing, the foreclosure mess was the missing protagonist from the week’s headlines. Here’s a re-cap of some of the important things happening in the depths of foreclosure-land.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 06:49:08

Ok, Ok, it involves jade and not GOLD! CASH! or audit the Fed…but it went good with Hwy’s not-yet-adjusted-post-daylightsaving-earlier-than-usual …coffee :-)

The Rise of the Tao
By IAN JOHNSON / Published: November 5, 2010 / NY Times Magazine

“Taoism can save the world.”

Zhengzhou is one of China’s grittiest cities. An urban sprawl of 4.5 million, it owes its existence to the intersection of two railway lines and is now one of the country’s most important transport hubs. The south side is given over to furniture warehouses and markets for home furnishings and construction materials. One of the biggest markets is the five-story Phoenix City, with more than four million square feet of showrooms featuring real and knockoff Italian marble countertops, German faucets and American lawn furniture. Living in splendor on the roof of this mall like a hermit atop a mountain is one of China’s most dynamic and reclusive Taoist patrons, Zhu Tieyu

The articles 5 page ending… ;-)

“…with its millions of people racing toward modern China’s elusive goals — prosperity, wealth, happiness.”

(Ian Johnson is the author of “A Mosque in Munich” and “Wild Grass: Three Stories of Change in Modern China.” He is based in Beijing.

A version of this article appeared in print on November 7, 2010, on page MM52 of the Sunday Magazine.)

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 06:50:22

Faithful mortgage payments may hobble economy
By Don Lee McClatchy-Tribune
Posted: 11/04/2010 02:21:51 PM PDT

WASHINGTON — For almost two years, home foreclosures have swept the nation, spreading misery among once-buoyant families, spattering lenders with red ink and undermining efforts to restart the economy.

But a bigger problem may turn out to be the millions of Americans who are still faithfully paying their mortgages, but on houses worth far less than before the bubble burst. It’s not that these homeowners will stop making their payments. It’s just the opposite — that they will keep doing it.

How could that be a source of future trouble? Because, with home prices stagnant in much of the country, payments on mortgages that are underwater could absorb billions of dollars that might be used for other forms of

And the drag could persist for years.

Of the estimated 15 million homeowners underwater, about 7.8 million owed at least 25 percent more than their properties were worth in the first quarter of this year, according to Moody’s Analytics’ calculations of Equifax credit records and government data.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_16524856?source=most_viewed

Comment by palmetto
2010-11-08 06:58:13

He must’ve gotten his talking points from the Amazing Zandi.

 
Comment by Elanor
2010-11-08 09:41:05

People should stop making their car payments too. After all, a new car diminishes in value the moment it’s driven off the lot!

Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 15:34:21

Much easier to repo a car than a house…

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 12:20:39

The fact that people who are still paying their bills are considered a “problem” says volumes……….

USA = Too fooked to fix.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:47:09

Short of a total meltdown and some REAL hardship, nothing is going to get fixed.

And it WILL come. Maybe not today or even this decade, but history shows a nation, and especially and empire, cannot survive plunder by its aristocracy.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 06:55:52

Harley-Davidson to build bikes in India

Harley-Davidson, the iconic American motorcycle brand with a cult-like following, has announced it has chosen to build its second assembly plant ever outside the United States in India.

The “complete knock down” plant or CKD is expected to be up and running in the northern Indian state of Haryana in first half of 2011. Parts made in America will be put together for the Indian market in Haryana.

“What we are doing is made in USA, assembled in India, which will have a positive job effect back home which is why we are driving this investment as quickly as we are,” Anoop Prakash managing director for Harley Davidson India told CNN.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 07:04:24

And over time the Indian content will increase until its 100%, then they will start importing the hogs from India back into the USA.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 07:06:46

Then would it be an “Indian”?

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 07:25:38

It would be an “American Indian”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2010-11-08 12:14:20

+1 LOL!

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 12:27:10

“Hari-Davidson”

Selling models like the “Vishnu-Rod”

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 16:48:35

Or the Shiva Twin.

 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:20:47

then they will start importing the hogs & the made-in-China hog spare parts from India back into the USA ;-)

Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:26:41

I believe there are still import tariffs on motor bikes coming into the US.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 11:16:25

IIRC it’s only for “large displacement” bikes which would compete with Harleys, e.g. Honda Gullwings.

It would be poetic justice to charge the tariff against Harley that Harley lobbied to put in place.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:12:10

Harley-Davidson, the iconic American motorcycle brand with a cult-like following, has announced it has chosen to build its second assembly plant ever outside the United States in India.

BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! (fpss™)
&
Ho ho, hah hah, hehehehehehe, BwaHaHaAhHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! (Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower™)

As I mentioned to RA RA yesterday, India’s 1.1 Billion consumers & China’s 1.3 Billion consumers scrambling about for a 250 sqf wifi shelter with a detatched moped shed, ain’t exactly what “the lil’ people” are goin’ be content with…long-term.

Ouch!,…(Hwy gets smacked alongside the head with a made-china-assembled-India 20# Louis Vuitton bag.) ;-)

Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 07:57:31

We work with folks from India who regularly talk of one day owning a Harley Davidson. One guy had like 300+ pictures he’d taken at a biker event. I asked if he had any pictures of Hondas, Suzuki, Etc. Nope, Harleys only.

We now use Harleys as an ice breaker when conversing with (male) Indians for the first time. They seem to like those Harleys.

Comment by oxide
2010-11-08 15:38:10

I read somewhere than Indians like to show off to their friends (the example I read was that Indian hostesses change their clothing multiple times during a party to show off wealth). The H1-B’s neighbors in Ohio loved buying SUV’s with their names on the vanity license plates.

I guess Harley’s are all about image?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 15:47:19

(Indian hostesses change their clothing multiple times during a party to show off wealth).

I prefer throwing crumpled wads of dollar bills at my Brazilian party guest’s feet.

But I chuckle when I do it so they don’t get offended.

 
 
 
Comment by yensoy
2010-11-08 10:46:40

Maybe Harley will do the right thing and make fuel efficient mopeds for a start!

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 09:27:18

Will they change the nickname away from “hogs” in order to not offend Muslim sensitivities? India has the largest Muslim population of any country.

Comment by Elanor
2010-11-08 09:43:07

How about “sacred cows” ?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 10:05:49

True Story: For a few years, President Harry Truman’s official plane was called the Sacred Cow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 11:06:40

India has the largest minority Muslim population of any country. But they have the third largest Muslim population, after Indonesia and Pakistan.

 
 
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-08 13:29:18

I belive Mahindra got their start making CKD Jeeps. They still make ‘em there, albiet with a different engine. http://www.film.queensu.ca/cj3b/world/MahindraJp.html

 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 06:58:59

Regional report from the NY Fed Reserve:

Select reasons why the housing sector helped the New York-New Jersey region fare better than the nation during the recent downturn include:

The region’s housing sector is relatively mature. Housing construction and related jobs generally account for a smaller share of economic activity here than they do in regions with faster population growth;
Upstate New York added relatively few jobs in housing-related sectors (e.g. construction and sales of consumer durable goods) during the boom years;

Overall, the region had less penetration of nonprime loans into its housing market and therefore has lower mortgage delinquencies;
Fewer mortgages are “underwater”—whereby more is owed than the home is worth—lessening foreclosure risk and consequent accompanying distress and reduced consumption.
“During this recession, the housing sector contributed less volatility to the regional economy than it did in much of the nation,” Mr. Dudley added.

Other highlights from within the region:
Upstate New York: The housing boom and bust largely bypassed upstate New York where construction activity is a relatively small part of the overall economy. Home prices have generally stabilized across upstate New York, with some parts (Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse) even experiencing price increases over the past year.

************
I’m not being an arguing troll here but there is some exhaustion in waiting for prices to fall and watching them actually increase. Confusion sets in. And with a second announcement of QE I do wonder if the clock is ticking on the purchase window. Wtg for prices to even return to what we saw in 2008 has been like waiting for Godot and inventory in my niche has disappeared so no pressure there.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 07:13:57

Welcome to the “Wall Street is the Economy” community. “We’ll be fine as long as the stock market holds up.”

CarrieAnn, you can join the army of zombie debt slaves anytime you want, they are holding the door open for you.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 07:23:43

Some get shored up w/reminders of why it’s good to wait and some just get knocked down. My apologies for being unworthy. Thanks for your support Blue Skye.

I’m just asking to deal with the actual on the ground facts not just the mantra. But thanks for treating me like just another troll despite years of acting otherwise.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 08:11:36

After another wonderful season living on my boat and bobbing around the CA/US border waterways, I’ve taken residence in a nice little lake cottage. My benefactor is a lady who several years ago bought the dream cottage for 8Xincome on a lifespan mortgage. She’s sure it is a wealth wagon and she is generous enough to offer a partnership. I’m compelled to stick to the carpentry projects that are my end of the lodging bargain and continue quietly on my own path in the spring.

This twilight zone housing/credit bubble that refuses to die costs us all in one way or another.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 10:13:45

“This twilight zone housing/credit bubble that refuses to die costs us all in one way or another.”

I’m absolutely with ya on that one.

I’m down because I’m confused. I’m confused because the signs of capitulation I’m waiting for in the very market I’ve been watching (not the MSM reports) aren’t surfacing. And I have to admit what’s really eating at me is the continued QE. And to tell you the truth, Blue, as I’ve said to DH lately, I hang around way too many people w/deep pockets so I don’t get a lot of reinforcement of how bad things are. In fact, I get just the opposite. I’m steeped in continual pressure. Usually bounces off me. Today I needed hbb for help.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 12:15:21

I hang around a lot of people who talk of deep pockets too. Some of them may have resources to swim against the tide, some of them just talk their bets, and some of the biggest talkers keep turning up with their pockets turned inside out. What’s best for them or their egos isn’t best for one’s self. The direction of the tide is certain in NY. House prices are headed down, with some celebrated partial bounces along the way. Income and tax revenues in the state are falling. The state is in a crisis because of it. This is a time to increase one’s financial security by avoiding leveraged investment in falling assets and avoiding entanglement in future obligations to pay.

There were more houses for sale on this little gem of a Finger Lake than anyone can remember ever. Some of them sold. Not so many though, lots of weathered signs still along the road. With patience, we’ll see how that turns out over several years. The one next to me is an ugly attemped transformation of a century old one story cottage into a three story bubble house. It is stopped. Mr. Deep Pockets apparently has some funding issues.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 09:36:47

“reminders of why it’s good to wait”

and I thought I had given several reminders in short. Perhaps it is the cold north wind today that has you down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2010-11-08 08:07:12

“inventory in my niche has disappeared”

Actually, the same can be said for us. About four houses I have been following all went under contract in the past two months. One lot I had my eye on had its first contract fall through and within weeks went under contract again, and sold on Friday. There is nothing on the market now that remotely interests us. There are, however, a few possibilities stuck in the foreclosure pipeline. Eventually the python will digest those pigs. I can be patient.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 10:47:08

It’s good to hear your patience comment, Kim. I know there have been a few posts here reporting the same from several places. I think most of us are in flyoverville but I’m not certain of that.

The rent to purchase ratios are very very different in this market than what many others are looking at. We have amazingly little SFH rental inventory so If you can even find one, most SFH rents avg $2200 in this particular school district. This puts the rent vs buy equilibrium at a completely different place than most people are dealing with, even people just the next town over.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2010-11-08 14:44:09

As somebody who bought in the last year, I’d like to give you a thumbs up for waiting further. We had a bump in sales and prices in the city I live in which made everybody think the worst is over and congratulate us on buying “at the bottom” as properties sold even a few months later had a significant price bump.

I’ve stopped telling them over and over that 2012 is the EARLIEST we’ll see a bottom as they don’t want to hear it.

On the other hand, keep your eyes open. Maybe you’ll find a probate or some other ‘must sell’ situation that has blown all their waiting time on wishing prices and have to get serious extremely quickly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2010-11-08 10:48:34

Well Carrie I agree with you on one point; prices are still grossly inflated in upstate. You and the Fed are wrong about;

Prices are “stabilized”

The bubble bypassed upstate

Construction related employment didn’t impact employment rates

Lie Lie and Lie. (No you’re not a liar)

If the bubble bypassed upstate, how did prices as much as quadruple from 1998-2008?

If prices have stabilized, why am I seeing price reductions day after day on zillow and trulia?

If employment wasn’t driven by housing during the bubble years, then why did unemployment fall and where did all those newly employed people work? (I have a hint….. it wasn’t at the hundreds of shuttered mills and factories)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 06:59:58

Hugo Chavez defends state takeovers of apartments

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — Facing a wave of criticism from business leaders, President Hugo Chavez is defending his order for government officials to seize control of residential complexes.

Chavez promised Sunday to crack down on construction and real estate companies that he accused of unjustly boosting prices, which he labeled “housing fraud.”

The president, a self-proclaimed revolutionary who idolizes Cuba’s Fidel Castro and is currently on a visit to Havana, called his decision last week to order the expropriation of six residential complexes and “the temporary occupation” of eight gated communities in Caracas and other cities “an act of justice.”

Venezuela’s consumer protection agency and state prosecutors are investigating complaints that construction companies and real estate firms are illegally charging buyers high interest on unfinished apartments, even though the buyers settled on a price years ago and made down payments.

“We have decided to put an end to this type of organized crime,” Chavez wrote in his weekly newspaper column.

Comment by 2banana
2010-11-08 07:05:41

Wow - now that is a unique solution.

I wonder if they have no doc loans, corrupt apprasials and CDOs in Venezuela…?

Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 09:30:26

I’ll bet FBs are terminated with extreme prejudice.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 07:18:31

Go Hugo! Go Hugo! Go Hugo! :-)

Comment by Kim
2010-11-08 07:51:36

He is way behind the curve. Our government took over Fannie and Freddie (and about oh, 90% of the lending market) years ago.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 07:07:35

According to the National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association, more than 10 million U.S. households will not be able to afford to heat their homes this winter without assistance, which would be a new all-time record.

< Especially tough for people heating with oil. Home heating oil runs to nearly $3.00 a gallon these days. Put on sweaters, set the thermostat at 62 degrees and hope for a mild winter!

~ The 10 million households which need assistance to pay the heating bills? They must turn to government (taxpayers, present and future) for a handout.

Comment by combotechie
2010-11-08 07:15:14

Cash, cash, cash …

Comment by clark
2010-11-08 08:03:06

cash cash cash, nope, shell game.
They just want to take the money from me, to give to them.

 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-11-08 07:19:47

“According to the National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association, more than 10 million U.S. households will not be able to afford to heat their homes this winter without assistance, which would be a new all-time record”

Oh great. More freebies from the govt. So now Obama is paying your mortgage, buying you a car, taking care of your health care and now as a final cherry on top of the socialist pie, he’s going to pay your heating bills too.

What a swell guy.

Remind me why I should work again….

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 08:50:21

More freebies from the govt. ..paying your mortgage, buying you a car, taking care of your health care and …he’s going to pay your heating bills too. Eddie

I don’t understand why all of these are deemed necessary if times are as good as you constantly say they are.

Remind me why I should work again….

So you can get a table at Chili’s?

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 12:39:31

I figured him as more of a “Cracker Barrel” guy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:45:38

I like their breakfasts, even if my waist line doesn’t.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:44:11

Cracker Barrel is a staple for corporate pilots on road trips.

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2010-11-08 17:59:42

So now Obama is paying your mortgage, buying you a car, taking care of your health care and now as a final cherry on top of the socialist pie, he’s going to pay your heating bills too.

Eddie - Home heating assistance is not a new program dreamt up by Obama. It’s been around for decades.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 07:25:09

“It is not consistent when the Americans accuse the Chinese of exchange rate manipulation and then steer the dollar exchange rate artificially lower with the help of the printing press.”

~Wolfgang Schäuble,

Comment by seekingsun
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 07:35:48

GLOBAL ECONOMY-Obama returns fire after China slams Fed’s move

NEW DELHI, Nov 8 (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama defended the Federal Reserve’s policy of printing dollars on Monday after China and Russia stepped up criticism ahead of this week’s Group of 20 meeting.

The G20 summit has been pitched as a chance for leaders of the countries that account for 85 percent of world output to prevent a currency row escalating into a rush to protectionism that could imperil the global recovery. [ID:nSGE6A703T]

But there is little sign of consensus.

The summit has been overshadowed by disagreements over the U.S. Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing (QE) policy under which it will print money to buy $600 billion of government bonds, a move that could depress the dollar and cause a potentially destabilising flow of money into emerging economies.

“I will say that the Fed’s mandate, my mandate, is to grow our economy. And that’s not just good for the United States, that’s good for the world as a whole,” Obama said during a trip to India.

“And the worst thing that could happen to the world economy, not just ours, is if we end up being stuck with no growth or very limited growth,” he said.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:46:35

We tried to play nice…….and were laughed at.

So now they are bitching. Have them call 1-800-555-WAAH

 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-11-08 07:37:23

Over the weekend I spent time looking at TVs. I went to the usual places, Costco, Best Buy and one local high-end electronics place. I don’t know if I have ever seen Costco as it was Saturday. Craziness.

Next up Best Buy. Within about 20 seconds of showing interest in a TV, I was offered 24 months interest free financing. To me it’s always kind of weird thinking of financing for a $2500 item. But it’s there at 0% which explains how those $2500 TVs are flying off the shelves.

Then off to local high end place. Same thing with the financing there. Except they’re offering 36 months interest free. When I parked, there was a guy putting a 58″ Samsung in his van. When I left, there was a couple carrying out a 46″ LG to their car. Seems like the financing is working there as well.

I didn’t buy anything yet. So many options I was a little overwhelmed and need to digest everything I saw, read some more reviews online. But judging from these 3 stores, a) there is no shortage of credit out there b) despite the doom and gloom presented by the MSM and HBB, people are out these spending money, c) cash is king is BS. Anyone can walk into a BEst Buy with $0 in their pocket and walk out with a brand new TV.

PS: Yes, I know for most of you $2500 for a TV is crazy and you’re more than happy with the 19″ b&w you’ve owned since 1977. No need to tell me.

Comment by Ben Jones
2010-11-08 07:59:38

OK troll, I’ve called you out on this before and you vanished. Let’s try it again:

‘despite the doom and gloom presented by the MSM and HBB, people are out these spending money’

So you define what this ‘blog’ thinks, and go on about how long it took to get a pizza or a TV. But how do you reconcile this with your statements earlier?

‘Oh great. More freebies from the govt. So now Obama is paying your mortgage, buying you a car, taking care of your health care and now as a final cherry on top of the socialist pie, he’s going to pay your heating bills too. What a swell guy. Remind me why I should work again….’

‘Here’s the thing. Nobody can make a profit on good make in America. Not with unions, a 35% tax rate, OSHA, ObamaCare and the other thousands of regulations imposed on American manufacturing. And without a profit, no company will stick around to operate as a charity simply to provide jobs.’

So which is it? Is the economy doing just peachy, or have Obama/unions/socialists destroyed the economy?

Comment by Eddie
2010-11-08 08:20:44

You’re asking apples to oranges questions.

10 million households that get freebies from Obama and Co to heat their homes is about 10% of the population. Which is also, surprise, surprise, 10% of the population. This 10% will be unemployed for life since there is no incentive for them to get work. Obama is subsidizing every aspect of their lives. I’m sure many of the Best Buy people are on some kind of govt assistance. It’s not mutually exclusive to have socialism and lots of people buying things at Best Buy. Problem is as Margaret Thatcher said so well 30 years ago, this system work great until you run out of other people’s money.

And my statement regarding making a profit manufacturing in the US is valid. It is virtually impossible to do so with unions, osha, etc. All these pipe dreams you (collectively on HBB) have about the glorious return of manufacturing are ridiculous. When it costs $30 an hour for a unionized high school dropout to do the same work that can be done for $30 a day in Chindia, nobody in his right mind would choose the American option. And that’s where socialism/unions have destroyed things.

The same people who complain endlessly about outsourcing jobs are the same ones who want more taxes, more regulation and more impediments to business. I can’t for the life of me figure out how someone doesn’t see the connection between the two.

Finally, on the HBB there is endless talk of the so-called FB having no money. And while that may be true, it is irrelevant. One does not need money to buy things. One needs credit. So all this talk of CASH IS KING is total BS. There is an endless supply of money available to consumers at 0% or close to 0%. For cars, TVs, boats, you name it. So the notion that anyone without cash in the bank is effed, as is the standard thinking here, is wrong. I could walk into any car dealership today without a penny to my name and drive out in a brand new car. Someone with cash in the bank is no better off than someone with no cash in the bank. Actually the guy with no cash is in a better position. Once you pay cash for the car, you’re out the money. If you pay $0 and 6 months later decide you don’t want the car anymore, you’re out nothing but 6 months worth of payments.

Comment by Ben Jones
2010-11-08 08:37:23

‘All these pipe dreams you (collectively on HBB)…on the HBB there is endless talk of…all this talk of…the notion that’

You’re not fooling me with this strawman bullshit, and dodging the questions. I can’t see any reason to let you continue to post here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2010-11-08 10:10:56

Strawmen, ducking, weaving and insidious lies and insults. It’s what the EddieTard does best.

Shut his dumb@$$ down BJ.

 
 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 08:37:47

Dumbest statement of the day.

“Once you pay cash for the car, you’re out the money. If you pay $0 and 6 months later decide you don’t want the car anymore, you’re out nothing but 6 months worth of payments.”

1. If you borrowed the money you have to pay it back. So if the car depreciates which they all do you still have to pay it back. You’re out much more than 6 months worth of payments.

2. If you don’t have a job you can buy anything.

3. If you are worried that you won’t have a job or that your going to need a larger and larger portion of your income to pay for food and fuel you won’t buy things like 52 inch TV’s. See arcitle below.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 08:41:36

2. If you don’t have a job you can’t buy anything, or are they giving TV’s to homeless people now?

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-08 08:41:31

“If you pay $0 and 6 months later decide you don’t want the car anymore, you’re out nothing but 6 months worth of payments.”

And so comes to an end the “lifestyle”.

The train of thought is a little shy of a full load.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 09:32:12

“Finally, on the HBB there is endless talk of the so-called FB having no money.”

I don`t think I have seen that here. I have seen people post that “the so-called FB” has money to spend, the money they are not paying the mortgage with becomes disposable income. I personally know several of them. One who had their house sold at auction 2 months ago and was supposed to be out of the house Oct 21 after not paying the mortgage for 3 years and now gets to stay. The people who bought the house at auction are getting their money back, and “the so-called FB” has no payment again while waiting to hear from their attorney. Presto! More disposable income.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-11-08 10:02:49

There isn’t any one view or ‘collective’ anything on this blog or anywhere else, for that matter. I’ve been involved in politics, and other sorts of public stuff many times. People rarely share exactly the same opinions. What I’ve noticed is each individual develops a way they see the world and other people in it. It might be more class based, race based, ideology, environmental, etc, more ways than can be named. They may be open to opposing ideas or not. The biggest flaw in making assessments about people is to generalize, IMO.

For example, I go to a lot of foreclosed houses. Some of these people drain themselves financially trying to keep the house. Others walk away after blowing the refinancing loot. On and on. There isn’t any way to make millions of people fit any one description.

Sure, people will grasp an example that validates their view and magnify that beyond its real significance. I think that’s human nature. And in public discourse, what matters or is real can be debated, and hopefully a clearer understanding can be achieved. This is where I don’t see this troll adding anything. He makes false, blanket statements telling us what “we” think, and then proceeds to tell us how wrong “we” are lecture everyone on how the world works. Why waste his time and ours, unless it’s more like a teenager making crank calls?

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 10:25:23

Ben Jones

Wise man.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 11:21:20

Eddie,

Did you ever hear about the “strawman that broke the camel’s back”?

No? Maybe you just did.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 11:26:54

I don’t know why, but I am often entertained by Eddie. Maybe it’s because he’s too young to realize that he doesn’t know it all. Maybe it’s because he’s kind cartoonish in his heartlessness. And he’s certainly persistent and has a very thick skin - others would have gotten discouraged and disappeared on their own. Can you let him come back in ten years, Ben?

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 10:07:25

Cheer up Eddie

30 years ago in Port Chester N.Y. at a less than fancy drinking establishment I got into a fight with what I thought were 2 guys. Turned out each of them had 3 friends there. Only 2 days later my vision had returned to normal, only a week and a half and my teeth tightened up and after only a month I could sneeze without pain.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-11-08 11:27:40

Yeah, back in high school the biggest, toughest senior, Steve, one day showed up with his middle finger in splints. He had been in a bar (18YOs could legally drink back then) and during an argument with a roughneck, he flipped the guy off. This oil-field fellow grabbed his finger and broke it sideways.

All week, Steve went on about how he was going to get this guy the coming Friday at the same bar. He talked and talked, really getting wound up about it. The next Monday he came to school and he had the other middle finger in splints. And a black eye.

True story!

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 18:10:20

I was just trying to point out to Eddie that he would recover from the beating he was about to take. I hope everything worked out for Steve.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 21:37:06

Oh come on ,the only thing that can explain Eddie and Joey is they must be paid to divert and give straw man arguments . Or maybe their income depends on some kind of outsourcing ,but that still wouldn’t explain how they tolerate the abuse . Could a person actually just find it fun sport to have such opposing views and
get a kick out of it like the crank call example Ben gave ?

What is interesting is Joey and Eddie have not changed one bit
in all the time they have been on this blog . Never any doubt in the Powers that Be ,never any doubt in the system ,always a oh well attitude about the pain and suffering of their fellow man .

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-11-08 21:57:48

‘trying to point out’

I was trying to point out that sometimes people go too far, and it bites them in the ass.

I’m sure Steve is safe tonight, sleeping in his redneck dreams, with crooked middle fingers.

 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2010-11-08 08:47:32

They’ve destroyed what could have been a much more amazing economy. If not for them, we’d all have flying cars and live forever.

 
Comment by SaladSD
2010-11-08 18:15:11

Eddie sees rich people. His parallel universe.

The richest 1 percent of Americans now take home almost 24 percent of income, up from almost 9 percent in 1976. As Timothy Noah of Slate noted in an excellent series on inequality, the United States now arguably has a more unequal distribution of wealth than traditional banana republics like Nicaragua, Venezuela and Guyana.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/opinion/07kristof.html

 
 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 08:12:38

SEATTLE – Companies that make huge flat-screen televisions and their LCD panel components are alerting investors that demand is dropping in the U.S. and other developed markets.

The forecasts trickled out as Asian electronics manufacturers reported earnings for the most recent fiscal quarter.

On Thursday, Sharp Corp. of Japan slashed its earnings forecast for the fiscal year, which ends in March, saying it had to adjust its production of LCD panels in the most recent quarter to respond to a sharp decline in demand for the large-size panels.

Let’s see we can believe Eddie’s observation or we can believe the reports from the companies that make them.

Comment by measton
2010-11-08 08:32:27

What Eddie is describing isn’t a strong market anyway. Companies that want to sell TV’s have to give big incentives to move them out of the store.

I’m going to go down to the local Homeless shelter and let them know that “anyone” can walk into a store with 0 dollars and buy a 52 inch TV. Then I’ll wait around the back and buy it from them for 200 bucks. Enjoy you’re 2500 dollar TV Eddie.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 08:31:34

Appears Eddie is a typical consumer when it comes to due diligence.

Flat-screen prices to tumble ahead of holiday season
September 23, 2010

An historically large oversupply of LCD TV panels is causing television prices to fall right in time for the holiday shopping season.

By the end of this month, LCD TV prices will be about 5% lower than they were at the same time last year, according research firm DisplaySearch. But a tailspin will start in October: In the last three months of the year, the firm forecasts that prices will keep falling until they bottom out at 12% below 2009 levels.

In some blowout sales, the price slash could be even more dramatic.

On Black Friday, 32-inch LCD TVs will drop to an average price of between $249 and $299, with the best deals as low as $199, according to a prediction from research firm iSuppli. The 32-inch LCD TVs currently sell for $349 to $399, on average, with the cheapest model (Emerson’s LC320EMX) selling for $300.

The forecasted price plunge stems from an enormous surplus of LCD panels that has accumulated over the first nine months of the year. Shipments of the panels rose to 52 million in the second quarter, but only 38.7 million TVs were actually shipped to retailers, according to iSuppli.

That 36% inventory gap piles on top of a 25% oversupply in the first quarter. Those figures are higher than anything seen in 2009 — which was also an awful year for flat-screen TVs. Sales were were so bad last year that prices fell by as much as 30%, according to DisplaySearch.

Why is the supply chain so overstuffed? Because demand for flat-screen TVs has been sluggish this year, thanks in part to manufacturers’ decision to hold back on price chops. The average selling price for LCD TVs even increased in July, as larger TVs and those with Internet and 3-D capabilities were added to the mix.

Prices finally starting to fall in August — after this summer’s World Cup proved to be a much smaller sales catalyst than TV makers had hoped.

Comment by polly
2010-11-08 09:15:24

There should be some really great sales right before the Superbowl…

 
Comment by WT Economist
2010-11-08 09:28:11

Bought my 37 inch when the price finally fell below $600.

If I had waited two years, I could have gotten a better deal for sure. The same model is on sale for $460 in the same store.

Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 10:34:22

I’m sure those numbers will come in handy when it’s time for the government to calculate CPI.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:04:00

You know it.

 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 18:08:13

Yep all of a suden flat screen TV prices will represent 20% of Core inflation.

 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 12:07:49

We watch news and sports, so I refuse to buy high definition at any price. The last thing I want to see is high definition spit emanating from the corner of a newscaster’s or baseball player’s mouth. Maybe when we get older and can’t see well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-11-08 09:30:50

Hey Eddie,

Don’t forget to purchase the extended warranty.

From the Best Buy forum
Buyer Beware -

Our 46″ Samsung broke after only 14 months. Unfortunately, the warranty is only valid for 12 months, so now we have a $2,000 piece of crap hanging on our wall that we (a) barely ever used (average about 6 hours per week); and (b) we had Geek Squad install so we could avoid any “future issues” as our salesperson so eloquently put it.

This is very frustrating to have a $2,000 TV last only 14 months, only to have the company who sold it to you claim no responsibility or propose any remedy.

Remember when TV sets used to last 14 years? That was also a time when our economy was stronger! … ironically?

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:41:04

“Remember when TV sets used to last 14 years? That was also a time when our economy was stronger! … ironically?”

We have our 25 year old Kenmore freezer/fridge in the garage, still serving as an overflow box. Still purrs like a kitten. The side by side in the kitchen is 11 years old now and has had a few problems, such as the water dispenser valve crapping out.

I doubt any of the new $2000+ fridges will last more than 3 years as their Chinese compressors will give up the ghost by then.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 13:35:48

And I’m using a 16-year-old telephone. And a two-year-old fridge that replaced its 17-year-old predecessor.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2010-11-08 13:32:49

Maybe its the lead free solder failing , my ex-boss explained how he fixed his big TV by re-flowing all solder joints on the power supply board.

curious how the military will not use lead free solder

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 14:00:55

Yeah, another cost of environmental mandates that get passed along to the consumer. Of course, the manufacturer get the blame for the “drop in quality”, ignoring the problems caused by the arbitrary government mandate.

The electronic OEMs have been talking about the potential problems caused by lead-free solder for several years.

We had the EPA try to ban one of the solvents we use in the aviation business. All the EPA-approved replacements cost twice as much, and worked half as well. The ban quietly went away when the OEMs showed that continuing to use the EPA approved stuff caused “safety of flight” issues.

Maybe the price of big screens will get so low, you won’t mind replacing them every 24 months.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 14:02:04

…….or there will be a collector’s market for “Vintage” flat panel displays.

 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:33:39

The hd conversion also spurred a lot of sales. Now everyone who wants one has one.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 10:35:27

is crazy and you’re more than happy with the 19″ b&w you’ve owned since 1977. No need to tell me.

“TrueHaskell™” didn’t any of your friends suggest a model to buy?

(Hwy glances over at the “friend recommended” 13″ color Sylvania w/remote that Mr. Cole now uses for used .50 cent Nintendo games, bought on sale at Fedco, 1988)

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 11:17:11

I took my mom to Costco in SoCal on Friday. Lots of parking available. There were lines to the cashier, but they moved quickly because people didn’t have much in their carts.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 12:14:48

I was in Home Depot yesterday. I’m here to tell you that the El Con Mall store wasn’t terribly busy.

Unlike the housing bubble days of the mid-aughts, several HD employees greeted me and asked if they could help me find things.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:51:59

Same here! I needed an adaptor to conect an air compressor to my sprinkler system (to blow it out).

The greeter walked me to the aisle where the stuff I needed was.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 15:44:08

I blew out my sprinklers myself for the first time this year. Saved myself $25 that way. Takes a long time with a homeowner sized compressor, but that’s not a problem when you’re retired.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:36:03

My experience at Sams Club as well. Shopping carts not as full as in years past.

We’ll see what Christmas looks like this year. Last year they had tons of Christmas candy and chocolate left over and they sold it at fire sale prices.

Comment by Kim
2010-11-08 13:11:09

I was in Sam’s Club yesterday. While I waited for the customer service counter to assign my one day pass a valid number, I noticed about 60%+ of the carts leaving with five or fewer items. Even though it sucked to have to stop by customer service first, I’m not sure it would be worth $40 a year to fill my cart with so few items.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2010-11-08 13:21:50

BJ’s just sent me a free 60 day membership. I can activate it any time between now and the end of the year.

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:14:22

The options:

-Believe Haskell, or

-Believe what you see with your very own Mark I eyeballs.

The gazillionaire I’m working a contract for, paid 13 million dollars for an airplane that would have sold for 23-25 million for 3 years ago. He had (and still has) cash. Mostly because of plain, dumb-azz luck. (Sold his company to a conglomerate in the spring of 2008, right before the banks started melting down)…..For him, life is currently good.

OTOH, the other guy I work for has a “knife catching” problem of his own. Bought an airplane in late 2008, thinking the bottom of the airplane market was in. Now wants to upgrade to something newer and bigger, but doesn’t want to take the million dollar hit he’d have to take on his current airplane (even though he can afford to, if push came to shove).

So nobody’s happy…….he can’t get the airplane that better suits his needs, and nobody can sell one to him, and do an upgrade of their own, or getting the airplane off their books.

My point is, a lot of educated people, with a lot of highly paid investment and money management help, have misjudged the way things have played out. I’m going to cut a little slack to the average Joe Blow from Kokomo, who made misjudgements based on unrelenting propaganda.

REAL cash is still king

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2010-11-08 13:22:10

Maybe it IS different in Portland. Everywhere we went to eat this weekend had a wait. And the restaurants within walking distance of there (that we had no interest in) were all busy as well. There are either a lot of people still in debt, people with more money than we given them credit for, or a lot of people and not enough restaurants in town.

We then had to go to Verizon since the battery on my phone keeps dying, which meant a trip to the strip mall in Beaverton. People everywhere, hard to find parking.

I don’t eat out a lot. So, to me it seems:
1. American humans can’t (or are too lazy to learn how to) cook.
2. American humans need to be entertained and fulfill that by shopping which, given where I live, I find disturbing.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 14:10:01

Or…..

3. With the price of groceries the way they are, you can eat out just as cheap as you can eat at home, and not have a mess to deal with.

My mom is pi$$ed. All her old recipes are being screwed up by the downsizing going on with grocery store stuff. Many of her recipes call for “one can of Campbell’s soup”, or something similar. Now, she has to buy two cans, and throw most of the second can out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 07:51:42

I don’t get it .
Ok ,America had long term systems in which health care ,taxes ,Social Security and future retirement were tied to America Jobs (long term jobs )

Ok ,so than all those long term financial systems get challenged by free
trade ,outsourcing ,losing USA manufacturing to other Countries by cheap
labor monopolies . The health care system increasingly burdens business by
the ever increasing price fixing monopoly that defies free market
capitalism because its a insurance monopoly . Now the Health care liability
is crushing business making American companies even more non-competitive. This is why Health care ties into the ever mounting American
business problems overall .

In return for these new Global systems ,apparently the USA gets the benefit of getting cheap foreign crap so people can go to Wal Mart and buy crap and industry can order cheap drywall from China and we can
have china take our steel and make inferior products . In the meantime
the middlemen and American Companies gain more profits ,and more
importantly other Countries gain jobs . So than America gets to gain wealth by selling overpriced real estate to each other ,than it crashes .

And nothing about this seems to have anything to do with the cost of living
in America or jobs that are needed for survival because the Global Market Makers bottom line is gross profits. So the markets disconnected from
the actual reality of all long term financial systems in America .Just like Wall Street and Banks disconnected from the fact that people needed to
afford the loans they took out . The disaster that Wall street and the Corporate machine has created in just a decade ,while they insist on bribing the Politicians to keep the casinos and faulty trade policies alive ,is
their fault and the fault of policymakers that can’t see the problems that
are created for main street ,the tax base, and the Social Security base .

The noble idea of allowing illegal immigration ,no doubt to supplement business ,ends up creating the problem of inheriting Mexico’s job problems
and welfare problems .But that’s OK, Ford and other American Companies
can just move their manufacturing base to Mexico and give the jobs to
the potential illegal immigrants ,such a easy solution the illegals don’t have to come here any more ,lets just move our manufacturing base to Mexico .
After all industry doesn’t have to give the Mexican worker health benefits,or the China worker .

Basically you had Corporate America ,Wall Street Middlemen ,Monopolies,
influencing and designing policy ,laws, and trade policies for a good 15 years now that has basically torn down anything that resembles something that would protect Main Street and the Majority of USA in terms of the long term systems in America and the job and manufacturing base .

And how is small local business going to compete with the big slave labor monopolies ,not likely in the long run .

If this is the brave new World, it’s actually a takeover from within . Add to that the bloated Union liabilities because of unsustainable promises ,especially in lite of the tax base being creamed, and you have a big rock with a American ship headed toward it .It’s correctable ,but not if the American people continue to get the same old PR BS . The Fat Cats are
now suggesting that it’s a simple matter of burning Americans on health care or promised benefits,after all the objective is to benefit Business ,as if Business operates outside the carnage of people .

When will it be apparent what has really happened here to the voting
population ,especially since the PR machine is alive and kicking with their bizarre solutions that won’t make a different with the real problems .

Comment by clark
2010-11-08 08:09:22

“When will it be apparent what has really happened here”

When the military boot meets the big fat bottom, and not a moment sooner.

See: The Fuzzy Logic of Useful Idiots.

 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 08:43:54

bottom line is…other countries can make stuff cheaper than we can.

Comment by exeter
2010-11-08 10:04:31

“bottom line is…other countries can make stuff cheaper than we can.”

BZZZZZZZT! Wrong.

The bottom lie is other countries devalue their currencies making stuff appear cheaper.

But do go on repeating those fantasical lies.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 10:39:28

A blast from the past….1993 in fact.

…I have been a free trader all of my life…But my recent analysis of the American economy has shaken my belief. I now find that trade liberalization in the US has produced a sharp drop in inflation-adjusted wages for as much as 80% of the population.

When a person changes his long-held beliefs, there must be overwhelming evidence to justify the change. Briefly my thesis is as follows:

The experience of most countries shows that prosperity lies in the expansion of manufacturing rather than agriculture and services. This is because manufacturing has much higher worker productivity than other sectors so that its salaries tend to be 150 to 200 percent of those in other areas..

Manufacturing, not trade, is the main source of prosperity. And history, recent and past, confirms this resoundingly.

Dr. Ravi Batra The Myth of Free Trade, 1993, Scribners Press Page: 3


This work appears at a time when the country is debating (NAFTA). Let me state it bluntly: Nafta would deal another crippling blow to America’s shrinking living standard. In (my book) GREAT DEPRESSION, I warned the government against its policy of financial deregulation and enrichment of the rich. My warning was unheeded, and now the nation is saddled with huge losses in the banking and thrift industries, an unprecedented social tumor of wealth concentration, and mass unemployment…

…America today stands at a crossroads. The passionate debate stirred up by NAFTA suggests that the proposed accord could make or break the system. With our myriad socioeconomic ills, I feel strongly that the free trade agreement could be the straw that breaks America’s back.

Dr. Ravi Batra The Myth of Free Trade, 1993, Scribners Press Page: 6

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:15:50

As I’ve been saying…

Yet the American people just voted more power to the very party that just boned them on jobs… again.

 
 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 11:39:10

“…making stuff appear cheaper.”

isn’t that like being sort of pregnant.

it is cheaper (in dollars) to a U.S. consumer or it isn’t.

not unlike the fact that my billing rate in a small rural MS town in 1998 was $ 45 per hour as opposed to $ 90 per hour in a more northern urban setting. my rent for a two bed room townhouse was $ 375 per month in MS and $ 950 per month for a one bed room apartment in Northern VA.

i think Virginia and Mississippi have the same currency.

someone who has a lower standard of living can make something cheaper than someone who has a higher standard of living.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 11:51:25

“…making stuff appear cheaper.”

isn’t that like being sort of pregnant.

it is cheaper (in dollars) to a U.S. consumer or it isn’t.

No because quality and lifespan of the product are very important considerations that are not easily quantified at the time and point of purchase.

There is no doubt in my mind that the quality of consumer items (now imported) has declined markedly the past 20 years.

Also: How “cheap” is a Chinese toaster when one takes into account the lost American jobs? Not so cheap in fact. In fact, it is dearly expensive.

 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 12:16:02

someone paying $ 375 rent per month can make a widget cheaper than someone paying $ 950 rent per month…all other factors being the same.

is that a true statement?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 12:26:25

someone paying $ 375 rent per month can make a widget cheaper than someone paying $ 950 rent per month…all other factors being the same.

is that a true statement?

You are missing the point that America has missed. It does not matter if that statement is true or not in the context of my argument.

My argument (and of many) is that the United States should subsidize, support and protect its manufacturing base as does most of the developed EU, Japan, China, Brazil and other countries.

Your argument is the failed argument of unrestricted free-trade that has hollowed out and gutted like a fish the middle class and our industrial base.

But we have “cheap” toasters.

 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 12:59:49

are you in favor of QE2 then…which may create a tariff by proxy?

 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 13:07:55

and i am not necessarily arguing for failed “unrestricted” free trade. i’m just having a discussion. if my post(s) seem snarky…that was not my intent.

i believe in free trade…but both parties should be on relatively even playing fields…which China is/was not IMHO.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 13:08:06

are you in favor of QE2 then…which may create a tariff by proxy?

If you mean by weakening the dollar then no. Weakening the dollar poses a danger to America and our long-term middle-class standard of living.

Rather, as our competitors do, The United States should subsidize, support and protect its jobs and manufacturing base.

The only reason we don’t and other countries do is because our corporate powers dominate our public policy more than theirs. We worry about our corporations. They worry about their country and their people.

 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 13:48:33

“The United States should subsidize, support and protect its jobs and manufacturing base.’

could one argue that if this had been policy over the past 30 years…the dollar would be weaker today…our standard of living would be lower…and our economy would not have been as robust?

all three of which are necessary now to bring equilibrium to this mess IMHO.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 15:18:36

could one argue that if this had been policy over the past 30 years…(of subsidizing, supporting and protecting American jobs)

our economy would not have been as robust?

I think it would have been differently “robust” as in a much healthier balance sheet for the middle class and less wealth inequality. Much of our “robustness” has been a mirage built on mountains of credit and GDP stats that overstate the distribution of our “growth” amongst our social classes. Almost all of our “growth” has been enjoyed only by the rich.

our standard of living would be lower…

Maybe “lower” in the amount of cheap stuff but higher in peace of mind, job and financial security.

the dollar would be weaker today…

I think the dollar would be stronger because we would be more of a producer producing real wealth and not having to rely on printing money and staggering debts.

 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 09:08:50

If this is the brave new World, it’s actually a takeover from within

That just about nails it Housing Wizard

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 09:29:04

“After all industry doesn’t have to give the Mexican worker health benefits”

Actually, Mexico has a national health system, the Instituto Mexico de Seguro Social (IMSS). Granted, the financial burden the IMSS places on workers and employers in Mexico is miniscule compared to what American workers and employers have to pay for health insurance in the USA.

Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:36:01

Never have understood why prescriptions are so much cheaper in Mexico.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 09:57:29

Perhaps because the IMSS has determined what it will pay for them?

As I pointed out the other day, the IMSS is in trouble as the pension liabilities (it’s Mexico’s national health and Social Security org) are overwhelming it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 12:19:54

I’m sorry I missed the discussion. Does Mexico have universal coverage? I had no idea.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:29:41

Mexico used to have 3 tiers:

The SSA (Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia) covered everybody, but the level of service was basically appalling.

You could step up and pay into the IMSS. Care quality was half decent.

If you worked for the gov’t then you were covered by ISSSTE, which was better than IMSS. ISSSTE also had subsidized grocery stores and and othe rbennies,

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 11:07:01

Maybe because US patents don’t apply in Mexico.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:30:53

Its the same pharma companies down there. Generics weren’t that big when I lived there. Could be different now.

 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 18:21:21

Canada also has cheaper drugs
They dictate what they will pay for medications.

This and other regulation is why countries with socialized medicine pay half as much per person for medical care yet have very similar outcomes overall.

This is a HUGE benefit to their companies which don’t have to pay as much and for it’s citizens who have extra change in their pocket for spending on other things.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 10:29:34

Ok ,that’s good if Mexicans get some benefits from their Country ,and
that is all the more reason why its a desirable place for a American
Company to build a plant there where they don’t have to contribute to
health benefits .

 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 08:14:52

Realtors don’t want appraisers to consider foreclosure prices because “that kind of skews the market”.

Metro-east homeowners, banks are both suffering as foreclosures show no sign of slowing

http://www.bnd.com/2010/11/08/1465892/howeowners-and-banks-are-both.html#ixzz14hfG2Abv

(Southern Illinois) The ongoing spate of foreclosures shows no sign of slowing down anytime soon and is changing the way real estate sales are conducted.

The continuing mass foreclosures have dragged down some housing costs. Judy Doyle, a broker at Strano & Associates in Swansea, said the real estate market is saturated with an abundance of homes, but it has not dragged down all home values.

“I’ve asked appraisers if they use foreclosure prices, and they don’t necessarily use that because that kind of skews the market,” Doyle said. “It is not a true indication.”

The first wave (of foreclosures) was mostly centered around bad loans, and the current wave is the result of government action, such as delaying foreclosure processes …

“The unintended consequence of that is that it is still leaving many properties in the foreclosure process for a much longer period of time,” …”I would say the majority of cases they assist were delaying the inevitable, causing ever more uncertainty in the market as well.”

That has meant that the foreclosure process that once took 150 days is now taking twice as long…

“I think a lot of people have been dipping into their savings and retirement funds to stave off foreclosure,” … “The longer they continue to be out of work, the more pressing that becomes. Until the unemployment numbers bounce back to healthy levels, we will still see high levels of foreclosure.”

 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 08:15:22

WSJ

Individual investors are wading back into the U.S. stock market. That ought to make über-bulls think twice.

Positive forces including strong corporate earnings, improving economic data and more bond buying by the Federal Reserve have fueled a 17% rally in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index since late August. The market has now punched through its prior 2010 highs, set in April, to reach levels last seen in 2008 before the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

Predictably, that has also triggered a rebound in bullish sentiment and helped coax investors back into the market. The American Association of Individual Investors finds 48% of investors surveyed are bullish on stocks as of last week—the highest level since February 2007. Bearish sentiment, at 27%, is at its lowest since January 2006.

For now, this support could help the market extend its recent run. Yet it may also mean it is late in the rally game. Retail investors are usually a lagging indicator, reacting to past performance rather than predicting future gains. Their flows, says Harvard University lecturer Owen Lamont, can create “a short-term lift” but it rarely lasts beyond a few months. He and Andrea Frazzini of AQR Capital Management have written a series of papers together on this “dumb money” phenomenon.

Admittedly, the flow of money from individual investors back into the market has been more a trickle than a flood—from January 2009 through August, individuals pulled around $162 billion from equity funds.

Even so, a return of retail investors argues for caution. The prior high in sentiment this year came in late spring, just as the market was headed for a bruising selloff. It may not be wise to fight the Fed, but it can be just as ill-advised to follow the crowd.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:26:12

What can one do to preserve capital in an environment where the UDS is depreciating heavily against other currencies, with possible hyperinflation?

Are people moving back to the stock market, hoping that it will appreciate as the dollar declines?

Comment by measton
2010-11-08 12:31:43

You can bet that Lucy will pull the football away from Charlie Brown once again.

Arrrrrgh!

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:34:13

But she showed him a signed document!

Oops! It wasn’t notarized!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 19:05:18

Individual investors are wading back into the U.S. stock market. That ought to make über-bulls think twice…

Admittedly, the flow of money from individual investors back into the market has been more a trickle than a flood….individuals pulled around $162 billion from equity funds.

What’s he saying… That anytime individual investors feel confident enough to re-enter the market, it means the market is too high?
… that individuals and their “dumb money” don’t belong in the market at all?

48% of investors surveyed are bullish on stocks as of last week..

And 52%.. the majority.. are bearish?

Hey Owen.. Don’t bother me until the maids and ex-playboy bunnies brag about how they are going all-in.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 08:24:07

Families “helping” family….

Housing-Market Bust Changes Buyer Behavior

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20101108-707082.html

At a time when many Americans are wondering how–and when–the housing market will recover, some people not only are encouraging first-time buyers to jump in to the market, they’re also helping them come up with a down payment.

Twenty-seven percent of first-time buyers who purchased a home between July 2009 and June 2010 received a gift from family or friends to help with the down payment,

That’s up from 22% a year earlier, and is the highest percentage in the more than 20 years…

Also, 9% of first-time buyers received a loan from a relative or friend in the most recent data, compared with 6% who said the same in the results released last year… It’s likely many parents were motivated to help their children take advantage of a now-expired home-buyer tax credit of up to $8,000, and other favorable conditions, including lower prices and mortgage rates, researchers said. Tougher lending criteria may have also been a factor playing into the trend,…

First-time home buyers made up a record 50% of all buyers during the period, up from 47% in last year’s figures…

Certainly, many potential buyers aren’t buying in today’s market because they’re worried about the economy; for instance, they may be concerned about the security of the job they currently have.

Comment by salinasron
2010-11-08 08:46:51

“Certainly, many potential buyers aren’t buying in today’s market because they’re worried about the economy; for instance, they may be concerned about the security of the job they currently have.”

Certainly, many potential buyer aren’t buying in today’s market because they know house prices are out of whack with wages and they therefore are not going to loan or give money to their kids to purchase either.

 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 08:34:32

You guys ,investing in stocks is not the way Main Street America makes
a living . I guess thats how Americans are going to make a living without jobs
they will become day traders .

Comment by michael
2010-11-08 08:38:47

unemployed architect buddy of mine made out pretty good on the sale of his house and is day trading now.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 08:49:15

michael. Of course other countries can make products cheaper than
us . The point is how do we even buy cheap products if we don’t have jobs . What is the point here ,for the USA to trade positions with poverty stricken Countries ?

Comment by whyoung
2010-11-08 10:06:56

Has anyone watched the sitcom Outsourced?

Anyway, it’s about a call center in India for a novelty company that sells junky plastic stuff… there was one episode where the workers were asking why Americans needed to buy this stuff and a funny justification by their American manager…

(you can catch a few episodes on Hulu…)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 11:10:50

We also know of someone who’s daytrading after being laid off. That and he opened a strip club.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 11:29:10

We also know of someone who’s daytrading after being laid off. That and he opened a strip club.

Which one does he like doing more?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 12:05:24

My guess is that he’ll be able to give wonderful anecdotes about the “process” of “stripping”,…that’ll be happening right before his eyes. ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Elanor
2010-11-08 09:57:15

I hope they do better at day trading than I did, or most of them will go broke.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 11:43:10

LOL Rio …..Anyway I suspect that the American Majority day-trading will work out about as well as the Real Estate flipping did .

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 12:23:50

Ugh. I remember when my dad day-traded after he retired. Worked great until 2000-2001 when he lost more than half his retirement.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Elanor
2010-11-08 13:46:29

Ouch. That’s sad. I feel kind of fortunate that my dad can’t even use a computer. It keeps him out of trouble. ;)

 
Comment by In Montana
2010-11-08 14:56:49

My father was a home computer pioneer (even had an Altair) and used to monitor the markets online with a dialup modem..but lost his facility with a keyboard just as the WWW and all the online trading outfits were coming in.

A pity, really. He would have loved it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 19:16:57

You guys ,investing in stocks is not the way Main Street America makes a living

You called it investing. That’s what it is..
True, it’s no way to make a living, but it’s a good way to build money for retirement.

Day trading is a good way to make an ulcer.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 08:35:41

(But)…“it’s a great time to buy.”

Real estate agents’ ranks likely to shrink further, experts say

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-salesindustry_08bus.ART0.State.Edition1.3ca0535.html

As the residential sales industry struggles through its fourth year of declining sales, top executives are bracing for even more downsizing in the business.

The number of U.S. home sales agents and brokers has dropped by about a quarter since the industry’s salad days before the housing market crash.

But home sales have fallen even further – they’re down almost a third since 2005.

The gross commission total has plunged 50 percent in the last five years, estimates Lawrence Yun…

“The pie has gotten smaller,” he said over the weekend at the Realtors’ annual meeting, where about 20,000 members were expected. In 2007, more than 30,000 Realtors showed up…

“The truth is we have too much capacity,”…”There are way too many brokers in America.”

The National Association of Realtors, the industry’s biggest trade group, has about 1.1 million members. It had 800,000 a decade ago when home sales were at about current levels.

“We bubbled up to about 1.4 million members” in 2006, Peltier said. “We don’t need 1.4 million. We need probably 750,000 agents.”

The industry has been in survival mode the last few years, …

“Most brokers were consumed with right-sizing their business for the size of the market,” …”They were closing and consolidating offices and laying off staff. That’s not pretty when you have to do that.”

…home sales professionals have to ponder how they will prosper as they move ahead in a slower growth period….”There really is nothing on the horizon that would suggest this market is going to recover materially anytime soon,”…

Most agents who have hung on during the economic storm are making significantly less than they did a few years ago.

“They are working harder than they have ever worked in their lives for less money,” Perriello said. “Don’t get discouraged.

“Depending on what market you are in, this has been going on for four or five years – don’t give up.”

The National Association of Realtors is predicting only a modest increase in pre-owned home sales next year.

…as many as 25 percent of the home sales her nationwide company is seeing are to investors, many of whom are buying foreclosed homes.

“Distressed properties over the next few years are going to be a significant part of the business we do,” Kelly said. “One of the things we are pushing to get the public to realize is don’t sit on the sideline – it’s a great time to buy.”

Comment by clark
2010-11-08 08:58:28

”They were closing and consolidating offices and laying off staff. That’s not pretty when you have to do that.”

Ok, that explains the latest new realtwhore in town. The one driving down the road in a rust free 1960’s pickup truck with his logo on the door.
He must have gotten the contract for the hot potato houses that are Still over priced and not selling, just sitting.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 09:19:57

Ok, that explains the latest new realtwhore in town. The one driving down the road in a rust free 1960’s pickup truck with his logo on the door. He must have gotten the contract for the hot potato houses that are Still over priced and not selling, just sitting.

I’d love to see a photo!

Comment by clark
2010-11-08 09:59:52

Sorry, all I can give is a description. It was a white G.M. truck with stock wheels and tires. The logo was red lettering.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 09:03:35

BTW: These were NOT Lawrence Yun Quotes clipped from the above article.

“The pie has gotten smaller,” he said over the weekend at the Realtors’ annual meeting, where about 20,000 members were expected. In 2007, more than 30,000 Realtors showed up…

“The truth is we have too much capacity,”…”There are way too many brokers in America.”

 
Comment by exeter
2010-11-08 09:59:28

“The gross commission total has plunged 50 percent in the last five years”

This is huge and cannot be overstated.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 10:25:50

Which tells me that the future lies in online buyer-seller matching services like Redfin and Zip Realty.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:28:52

I think that it might take some time for people to get used to, as they are accustomed to the worthless “hand holding” a Realtor gives them.

This brings back a memory: Around 2000 or so I booked a vacation completely online (via a package): rental car, airfare, hotels, etc. It was the first time I did that without talking to someone on the phone. It felt weird back then. Of course now I wouldn’t blink an eye at doing that, as it seems very natural and normal.

Eventually Realtors will go the way of the travel agent.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:31:35

Heck, I bought tires last week at tire rack. Had them shipped directly to a shop where they were mounted. Beats the hell out of going to the tire store.

There were tons of customer reviews which steered me away from tires that wear out fast (avoid Kumho tires) or that have poor snow traction. Try getting that at a tire store!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 15:49:31

Eventually Realtors will go the way of the travel agent.

These days, travel agents seem to be doing a lot of cruise business. I don’t know how lucrative that is, but it seems as if that’s where they’ve ended up.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:24:37

On-line is how I shopped for my last house back in 2000. It’s also how I found comps and was able to make a fair offer that was accepted almost without question.

It’s even easier today.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 08:45:07

Think about it ,people use to invest about 10% of their income into stocks ,CDs , bonds ,whatever . Usually these investments were set up for a long
term yield ,(the get rich quick or speculation stocks use to represent a small
percentage of the market) . Without jobs how are the people even going to invest that 10% . Is Wall Street going to get that capital from the rest of the World ?

Seriously another by product of Americans losing jobs to Globalism is that
less American dollars go into American investment . Talk about a tight money market where less funds will be available for even prudent investments .

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 09:13:01

I have oftened wondered how much of the money shoveled into 401ks actually was used for real investment and not simply just buying existing stocks hoping for speculative appreciation?

I suppose that some companies sold new stock issues into the market, but what percent of all transactions did that ever really represent?

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 09:45:12

Wall Street is a bogus Casino now in which the allocations of funds into
productive or needed avenues is creamed by short term gain rigged
markets . Wall Street investments have nothing to do with investing in America anymore ……god knows what your investing in because Companies are in part Global and you might be investing in a new
plant in Mexico /

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 10:14:23

Wall Street investments have nothing to do with investing in America anymore ……god knows what your investing in

Forty percent of the S&P 500 biggest corporations are now doing more than 60 percent of their business abroad. And America’s biggest investors are also going abroad to get a nice return on their money.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/05/americas_two_economies/index.html

There are two economic systems in this country. One is on the mend. The other is still coming apart

So don’t worry about America’s Big Money economy. According to the Wall Street Journal, Wall Street’s bonus pool is already up 5 percent from last year.

But there’s another American economy, and it’;s not on the mend. Call it the Average Worker economy.

Yet the American economy has lost 15 million jobs since the start of the Great Recession. And if you add in the growth of the labor force — including everyone too discouraged to look for a job — we’re down about 22 million.

Inhabitants of the Big Money economy are celebrating Republican wins last week. They figure financial regulations will be rolled back, environmental regulations will be canned, and it will be harder for workers to form unions.

Inhabitants of the Average Worker economy aren’t so sure. The economy has been so bad they’re angry at politicians. They showed their anger at the ballot box. They took it out on incumbents.

But if nothing changes in the Average Worker economy, there will be hell to pay.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 16:25:54

But if nothing changes in the Average Worker economy, there will be hell to pay.

Yep, Yep, & You betcha! / Jobs!, Jobs!, Jobs!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:28:48

“But if nothing changes in the Average Worker economy, there will be hell to pay.”

I doubt it. The party that just boned J6P on jobs was just given more power.

Just in time for redistricting.

All those votes didn’t come from just the well off.

 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 18:27:02

When things really turn shty you can bet that there will be a scapegoat for out anger. Religion will become a big issue, and rising nationalism.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 19:26:33

…But if nothing changes..

as if that’s even possible..
During what time of crisis in past history did nothing change?

Huge pressures towards change are developing. Maybe since you are participating, it’s difficult to see. An outsider can’t miss it.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 21:48:12

During what time of crisis in past history did nothing change?

During the past 5 years of crisis in the housing market considering our government’s public policy and fiscal response to it? Practically speaking.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 22:00:43

5 years.. that takes us back to 2005. Too early to expect change.
Maybe 3 years is fair.

But considering that RE is the slowest moving of markets and the effects of those movements are commonly delayed by years, I’d suggest the world is reacting to this current crisis in real-time… without any significant delay.

 
 
 
Comment by In Montana
2010-11-08 15:00:37

In Colorado, you know I never really understood how buying someone else’s used stocks helped the economy. What kind of growth does that facilitate? How does it enable some company’s capital investment?

Someone enlighten me..

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:24:38

“Used stocks”. LOL. I like that.

I guess its just like buying and selling used houses. The broker get s a commission whether or not you made any money in the transactions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 21:03:54

The smart money tends to buys stock in good companies with growth potential. That investment helps growing companies get bigger, and thus the economy grows and flourishes.

Stupid money buys stock in companies that are doomed to shrink or fail. That reduces stupid money as well as the number of dumb investors.

So, thanks to natural selection, the investment community gradually becomes smarter on average, and more money is invested in successes than in failures.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 22:02:06

I think you are missing the money making that takes place by shorting stocks . For that matter there is a whole world of casino playing that is taking place these days like credit default swaps and all kinds of leverage games . I think you are missing the lender
trades taking place .

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 22:07:15

and i think you missed the question i was answering, and are bringing up an entirely different subject.

In Montana
I never really understood how buying someone else’s used stocks helped the economy.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 09:13:54

Criminal barbering? Raids at Orange County shops lead to arrests, raise questions.

As many as 14 armed Orange County deputies, including narcotics agents, stormed Strictly Skillz barbershop during business hours on a Saturday in August, handcuffing barbers in front of customers during a busy back-to-school weekend.

It was just one of a series of unprecedented raid-style inspections the Orange County Sheriff’s Office recently conducted with a state regulating agency, targeting several predominantly black- and Hispanic-owned barbershops in the Pine Hills area.

In “sweeps” on Aug. 21 and Sept. 17 targeting at least nine shops, deputies arrested 37 people — the majority charged with “barbering without a license,” a misdemeanor that state records show only three other people have been jailed in Florida in the past 10 years.

The operations were conducted without warrants, under the authority of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation inspectors, who can enter salons at will. Deputies said they found evidence of illegal activity, including guns, drugs and gambling. However, records show that during the two sweeps, and a smaller one in October, just three people were charged with anything other than a licensing violation.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 09:22:45

Many years ago, when I was living in Pittsburgh, I went to a barber like the ones described above. Guy had a shop in his house, which was right next door to where I worked, and, oh, could he cut hair.

His prices were a screaming bargain, and he was a sweet fella too. He had quite the interest in men, but he wasn’t running a gay barbershop. It was just a shop where people went to hang out — and get a great cut.

I miss him.

 
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:44:06

Unsanitary barbering can lead to all sorts of nasties being spread.

Used razors are almost as bad as used needles if they are not sanitized properly.

Comment by yensoy
2010-11-08 10:10:40

How did you conclude that the raided sites were not sanitary? I don’t see that in the excerpt above.

Folks have been cutting hair for hundreds of years. It is not rocket science. Do you need a license to shave your face next?

Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 14:19:11

Because I’ve been to Mexico.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 10:22:05

Most states have an “Orange County”. Which one was this?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 11:59:26

Crissy Cox’s ‘hood silly : ‘The OC!”

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 10:51:44

As many as 14 armed Orange County deputies, including narcotics agents, stormed Strictly Skillz barbershop during business hours on a Saturday in August, handcuffing barbers in front of customers.

The USA today:

Busts For Barbers, Bonuses For Bankers

(who said we wouldn’t see any perp walks?)

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 12:21:59

“Busts For Barbers, Bonuses For Bankers”

Or

“Laws only apply to the little people”.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 09:23:22

Ok ,Ok , I have talked until I’m blue in the face . Joey or Eddie have not been able to explain how this New World economy is going to sustain
the American Majority .We have a unemployment or underemployment
situation that is more like 20% or more now .How good is that for the tax base or the Social Security fund base ,or even funds for investment in future industry that might be the American base ?

And why is it that the cheap product is the highest ideal so the middle men can make more profit . Why is it we went for years in this country
having more expensive products while we watched other countries
produce junk ,and we didn’t have the ideal that we should shift to that .

I remember years ago I found out that whenever we shipped cheap oranges to Japan they charged tariffs and made sure the American
product didn’t consume their market resulting in our cheap oranges costing
5 bucks a orange over there . Now why would a Country be so protective ?

If you can’t see the big picture ,than just keep believing that Globalism
and rigged markets and low wage monopolies are going to save America
because the 25% we save at Wal Mart is groovy ,

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 10:55:46

If I’m not mistaken both Eddie and Joey have at one time or another called for the elimination of the middle class and its replacement with minimum wage serfs.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:32:17

You’re wrong. They also called for the elimination of the minimum wage at the same time.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 19:55:10

Again you make no sense.

Assuming I enjoy and profit from offshoring, why would I want to eliminate one of the biggest reasons it’s so profitable?

That American wages have a huge difficulty falling to suit changing economic conditions is a boon to offshoring enthusiasts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 21:22:13

Then why the tax breaks for offshoring jobs?

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 21:54:06

Why is our esteemed leader.. BO .. right now saying offshoring creates jobs?
Ask him.. or do some freakin research on your own for a change.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 22:10:42

Why is our esteemed leader.. BO .. right now saying offshoring creates jobs?

To appease powerful clowns that you admire and work for?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 11:06:50

Ok adding to my above post . Lets say the fact that this Global economy
is benefiting the job base of Countries other than America and the highest idea is the cheapest manufacturing of a product (even if it has a lower lifespan ,is produced without American type regulations ,and the products produce more pollution for the World ,and the foreign workers
are exploited by cheap wages without benefits .)

So ,lets say this job creation in other Countries is a good thing . Ok so since most the time the Countries that are producing this stuff won’t be
able to form Unions ,especially in Communist Countries ,the fact is
the work force of those Countries will continue to be exploited and not
be able to increase their wage to actually afford many of the products
that they ship ( at least not at the prices that Americans end up getting charged for the junk ).
So I’m saying lets say the cheap wage foreign exploited worker somehow forms unions and demands wage increase and benefits and they want to benefit by producing things for their own consumption .Than the true uplifting of a Countries people would result in the cost of production going up .Only if these workers remain exploited workers with low wages and all the other ill effects I mentions above will they remain
the better cheaper labor producers of crap for the world (while the middle men get the benefit of the high profit margins from cheaper production . So, it pads the pockets of Industry ,not so much the people

So America gives up its job base so China workers can barley raise their
standard of living because of no ability to increase wages by Unions or
anything that Americans were able to fight for . So, isn’t it exploitation
of any worker so more profits goes to the Fat Cats ,even if the fat cats
are the Government of China or whoever is pocketing the lions share of the money ? How can the exploitation of workers be a good thing .

How can Americans compete against workers that don’t even have the ability to rise up. So, the most powerless workers of the World ,that don’t even have Governments that allow for people revolting,are what we have to compete with . I guess you should just put the chains on
Americans now because you have reduced a entire Nation to the job
exploitation of powerless slave wage workers .

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:37:57

Actually, there has been a lot of labor unrest, protests and strikes in China in the last few years.

Wages for the Wu6P ARE going up. Slowly, but surely.

Here? Going down. Slowly but surely.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 21:10:50

Eddie and Joey keep saying that this exploitation of lower wage
labor is some kind of good thing ,like it’s that highest ideal that can be achieved and the sin of Americans were that they were just
not cheap enough . Its almost like Eddie and Joey think the Americans deserve their destiny of being betrayed by their Politicians and Companies /fat cats .

I think the bulk of Americans didn’t know what in the F—–K was going on ,especially when they are sold a PR campaign on
how lucky they were to have Wal marts . The American people were sold on some retarded real estate Ponzi-scheme also in which you can only say a hell of a lot of brainwashing went on to pull that one off .

Would you normal run of the mill American be looking that close or suspect that the Fat Cats were having their pockets stuffed and the Politicians would be going along with it to the degree they did .
Americans were probably looking for terrorist rather than traitors
that were running the Country .

In fact , I do think the trauma of 911 might of set the stage for
Americans to be somewhat off kilter .Its always a combination of
forces that contribute to a breakdown in logic or common sense .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 22:00:23

Eddie and Joey keep saying that this exploitation of lower wage labor is some kind of good thing ,like it’s that highest ideal that can be achieved and the sin of Americans were that they were just not cheap enough .

Well put. And it’s total BS anti-American propaganda. 30 years ago it would not have been tolerated.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-11-08 22:13:51

‘this exploitation of lower wage labor is some kind of good thing…30 years ago it would not have been tolerated’

I couldn’t agree more. These trade agreements have sold us out, and we’ve lost the backbone to resist it.

 
 
 
Comment by measton
2010-11-08 18:33:05

The bottom line is natural resources.

When natural resources are plentiful the elite need a large middle class to expand their wealth and power. As natural resources become limited they only need to control the natural resources. This is where we are now. The world as a whole is becoming more populated and consuming more and there is relatively less and less oil. The elite who control resources don’t care about having a large middle class anymore. IT’s actually a problem on the global stage. The sweet spot now is to have a lot of resources and a poor educated population to produce for the few that have money.

Globilization has been sold to us the the slogan that a rising tide lifts all ships. The problem of course is this is not true as the ships on the other end of the ocean see a falling tide. Also when the water is really shallow (depleted resources) there ain’t much of a tide for anyone.

Comment by Rancher
2010-11-08 18:43:57

When the tide goes out, that’s when you see who’s really naked.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:35:08

They can’t answer it Housing Wizard, because it won’t and can’t sustain J6P.

So they deflect, deflect, deflect. And why not? It’s worked pretty good for the last 30 years and more importantly, the last 20. Well, for the upper 10% of the population, anyway.

But the other 90% shot themselves in the foot as well, so why would they deserve any respect?

Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 19:46:33

bs.. you talk a good talk, but then you vote with your wallet when you buy all those cheap products… hide them under your bed so nobody sees what you’ve done… hypocrite!

We fund and support the status quo with our money and with our votes.

We tell Washington we care more about hindering American business practices and about the environment than we do about creating jobs. It all comes down to priorities.

You can’t have your cake and eat it too..

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 21:28:11

Me? There you go generalizing again. And deflecting too.

People without jobs or who have their wages cut have no choice but to buy those cheap products.

You still don’t have a rational answer for why the Repubs blocked ending tax breaks for offshoring jobs. Tax breaks that would have…. wait for it… wait for it…. gone instead to local business to hire.

Tax breaks for American businesses AND jobs.

Would you like some more? I can bring it all day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 21:49:33

bah.. i already answered it. You refused to hear and/or were too lazy to look it up..

“The legislation that was defeated in the Senate today would make US companies pay an extra tax, of up to 35%, compared to foreign competitors, and really hit companies like John Deere, where they have big overseas markets,” Grassley said.

The Iowa Republican also suggested that no evidence exists to support the view that deferral rules - the bete noir of the Obama administration - motivate firms to avoid US tax. These rules allow a US corporation to defer paying US tax on the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries until such earnings are sent back to the parent.
——

The bill was a sham.. it’s main focus was to tax offshore profits.. money that never even gets here.. at US rates.

The bill should have been called “Make US Companies Less Competitive”…

or “Prevent Offshoring by Encouraging US Companies To Leave the Country Entirely”.

After all, they can’t offshore if they aren’t even in the country..

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 22:12:28

Grassley said.

lol!

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 22:08:13

bs.. you talk a good talk,

You don’t even talk a good talk anymore Joey/Eddie/Cato Institute. Your message is threadbare, disproven by the results of history and vapid.

Vapid Dude.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mike in Miami
2010-11-08 09:24:35

The German secretary of finance:

Schäuble: The German export successes are not the result of some sort of currency manipulation, but of the increased competitiveness of companies. The American growth model, on the other hand, is in a deep crisis. The United States lived on borrowed money for too long, inflating its financial sector unnecessarily and neglecting its small and mid-sized industrial companies. There are many reasons for America’s problems, but they don’t include German export surpluses.

SPIEGEL: Last week, the US Federal Reserve Bank decided to flood the economy with $600 billion in new money. Will this stimulate the economy as hoped?

Schäuble: I seriously doubt that it makes sense to pump unlimited amounts of money into the markets. There is no lack of liquidity in the US economy, which is why I don’t recognize the economic argument behind this measure.

SPIEGEL: The US wants to depress the value of the dollar in this way, so that it can sell its products abroad more easily. In light of the ailing US economy, isn’t that a completely reasonable strategy?

Schäuble: No. The Fed’s decisions bring more uncertainty to the global economy. They make it more difficult to achieve a reasonable balance between industrialized and emerging economies, and they undermine the US’s credibility when it comes to fiscal policy. It’s inconsistent for the Americans to accuse the Chinese of manipulating exchange rates and then to artificially depress the dollar exchange rate by printing money.

The full interview is on spiegel dot de slash international slash world

Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 11:37:40

While I believe he is correct were was all this hand wringing over the last few years? BB didn’t just start printing money yesterday!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 09:31:07

‘I’m Going To Be Doing A Lot Of Investigating’…

“The most important thing my Committee can do is seek the truth. We’re the investigations committee, we’re the accountability committee, but Paul [Ryan] can’t be effective if the underlying facts and assumptions are not mutually agreed and it’s one of the problems we had in the previous two years was that we couldn’t agree on what the facts were therefore the conclusions that were different – each side blamed the other – that’s got to end,” Rep. Issa (R-CA) told “FOX News Sunday.”

 
Comment by ann gogh
2010-11-08 09:34:51

If you had little labels next to your names I would know if you are for social justices or prefer capitalism. I always side with combo and wmbz but sure hate the fighting in here!
anyway, my mom is moving to a senior condo and we are selling her pasadena condo. so far it’s down 300k from the highs. question: sell as is or repaint and repair first?

Comment by Steve J
2010-11-08 09:46:56

A fresh coat of paint goes a long way for $20/gallon.

 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 10:32:04

When I sold my place in 2006, the rule was that paint costs couldn’t be added to the RE basis for cap gains UNLESS it was applied less than 6 months prior to sale. Otherwise it was considered merely “maintenance” and didn’t affect the basis.

Is she going to face a big cap gains hit? You may want to work the numbers.

Would you do the work yourself?

Comment by ann gogh
2010-11-08 10:49:23

newsflash, my mom has four rooms of wallpaper. we are terrified of the fussy buyers. I am sure we’ll hire a crew just to get people in. that’s interesting about the cap gains rule.

Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 11:28:33

It always depends on who’s looking, the house we bought was dated with plenty of interesting wall paper and shag carpet in two rooms. My wife just didn’t see how things could look, but now with all the changes she is glad we bought it.

So if I were selling my mothers house, I would empty it, clean it, fluff & buff it, but wouldn’t go to far. The next people are libel to change everything anyway.

JMO and best of luck selling her house!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 12:16:38

So if I were selling my mothers house, I would empty it, clean it, fluff & buff it, but wouldn’t go to far. The next people are libel to change everything anyway.

Thanks, wmbz, for writing my soon-to-be job description for me.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 11:43:04

newsflash, my mom has four rooms of wallpaper. we are terrified of the fussy buyers.

I would for sure paint it in some kind of neutral off white. It might make a BIG difference for the right buyer. If it doesn’t, you’re not out too much.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-11-08 12:34:54

I agree with Rio. You can go two ways:

1) drastically lower the price and sell it fast.

2) remove wallpaper and old carpet, paint, stage and sell it at a higher price. It’s amazing how afraid many people are to do a little work. Makes no sense to me, but that’s how it is.

 
Comment by whyoung
2010-11-08 13:00:23

Don’t think too many people have the patience to properly strip wallpaper… Not difficult, but hard time consuming work.

In the mid eighties I helped a friend strip multiple layers of wallpaper off the living room in a early 1900’s house. Above the fireplace mantle was the dated signature of the worker who installed the first layer at about the time it was built.

I found that a charming testament to the pride of the paper hanger… signing your work in a place where it may never be seen.

 
Comment by SaladSD
2010-11-08 19:57:27

If the wall paper is snug on the wall, it’s much much easier to spackle the seams and paint over it. I just removed a border print left behind by the previous owners and it was a nasty job, took me two weekends. OTOH, my mom was able to remove wall paper from a small bathroom and it just peeled off the walls. Really depends on the condition of wallpaper adhesive. Check a small corner first.

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2010-11-08 15:13:46

Ugh. Who invented wallpaper, and why.

Same goes for the web version…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:44:21

To cover the cracks in the shiplap boards that were the standard interior of the day. It was cheaper and more colorful than plaster.

From Wikipedia:

“Sackett Board” was invented in 1894 by Augustine Sackett. It was made by layering plaster within four plies of wool felt paper. Sheets were 36″ x 36″ x 1/4″ thick with open (untaped) edges.”[4]

“Gypsum Board” evolved between 1910 and 1930 beginning with wrapped board edges, and elimination of the two inner layers of felt paper in favor of paper-based facings. Later air entrainment technology made boards lighter and less brittle, then joint treatment materials and systems also evolved.

 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 11:38:25

I would know if you are for social justices or prefer capitalism.

They are not at all mutually exclusive, however in the past 40 years:

The European model of social justice has promoted their capitalism way better than the American model of capitalism has promoted our social justice.

Comment by ann gogh
2010-11-08 12:03:08

But why do people with savings have to be lumped into wall street greed? just because i can pay my own way, why am I part of the problem? There will be plenty of time to hand out my money when I die.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 12:16:55

But why do people with savings have to be lumped into wall street greed? just because i can pay my own way, why am I part of the problem?

Well, I’ve never lumped people with savings into the Wall Street Greed machine. Maybe I have savings.

Most older, middle and upper-middle class savers have been punished by Wall Street greed and the “war on savers”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:48:17

I haven’t seen too many posts like that, ann gogh, except maybe from some folks who talk about kicking seniors to the curb.

Rio is right. It’s been Wall St. that has punished savers.

And yes, capitalism and social justice are not mutually exclusive. Just the way we practice it, is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Real Estate Refugee
2010-11-08 20:32:27

I’ve found that buyers respond really well to Benjamin Moore’s Linen White. Also like Simply White for trim.

Pay particular attention to where your eyes go whenever you enter a room. I installed a fairly expensive Bosh dishwasher in an otherwise unspectacular kitchen because it was the first thing you saw as you entered the kitchen. The buyer put it into the contract that the dishwasher stayed while he paid way too much for the place. Offered over asking. Of course this was 2006.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 21:31:10

Flat or satin for walls, semi gloss for trim.

A really neat trick is to make the trim just a little bit lighter shade than the wall color.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 22:29:08

I installed a fairly expensive Bosh dishwasher in an otherwise unspectacular kitchen because it was the first thing you saw as you entered the kitchen.

I brought my fairly expensive Bosh dishwasher to Brazil. It flat out ROCKS. (Some Brazilians don’t understand it because they have maids BUT, my Bosh never gets in my way)

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 22:40:24

I brought my fairly expensive Bosh dishwasher to Brazil.

Made in the USA. Almost all of my appliances I moved to Brazil were made in America. When I move back to America in a few years, I hope there is still American stuff to buy.

I wonder. :(

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 10:07:49

Homeowners say loan mods led them to foreclosure

LOS ANGELES – Grocery store owners William and Esperanza Casco were making enough money to stay current on their mortgage, but when JPMorgan Chase & Co. offered a plan that reduced their payments, they figured they could use the extra cash and signed up.

The Cascos say they never missed a subsequent payment, so they were horrified when the bank decided the smaller payments weren’t enough and foreclosed on their modest Long Beach home.

Their story is echoed across the country by people who claim — some in lawsuits — that banks didn’t live up to their end of the deal when they agreed to trial mortgage modifications.

The suits add to a feeling among many struggling homeowners that they’re getting little help from the part of the government’s $700 billion Wall Street rescue that aimed to help them directly.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-11-08 11:31:17

The Banking system has never been sincere in helping homeowners,or they might not be able to . For all practical purpose ,a lot of those loans were just bad loans and you can’t save a unemployed person who can’t make any payment .Add to that
people who are walking who might be able to afford the payment but
they don’t want to because they are underwater and both sides of the
contract are stroking each other and playing games . Both sides of the contract want a bail=out .

 
 
Comment by rms
2010-11-08 10:20:59

I took a drive from Santa Cruz to San Luis Obispo along the coast on Saturday, which was a beautiful drive. Monterey was crowded as usual, but we had a nice lunch there after visiting the skydiving center in Marina. Cursory observation: People along the coast [are] different from fly-over country, leaner, taller, more refined; lots of pretty women of proper height and weight with slender legs and bony ankles. In the Central Valley (Stockton, Modesto, Fresno) you see families with children when you are in a grocery store, but along the coast it’s uncommon; the cost of living has priced-out the family. RE prices are still extremely high even in unincorporated places like Los Osos. Not a chance I’d buy a falling knife around there despite my desire to return. I’ve been away for thirteen years now; I’ve done my penance. I’m uncertain my opportunity will ever arrive under desirable conditions. Tuesday I return to the cold and wind of fly-over country to sit out another “six month winter.” :(

Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 10:55:37

Palo Alto used to have three high schools: Paly, Cubberley, and Gunn. It’s down to two now (Cubberley was closed) and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Paly close now too due to it’s non-earthquake-code compliance.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 12:01:31

People along the coast [are] different from fly-over country, leaner, taller,

I lived there for 22 years but I think many only appear “taller” because they are leaner.

It’s amazing how many short Brazilians are so tall too.

But your observations hold a lot of truth.

 
Comment by m2p
2010-11-08 14:43:18

My old stomping grounds, lived in MB for over 30 years. I’ve got some of those bony ankles and elbows. The latter not so pretty.

 
Comment by In Montana
2010-11-08 15:17:20

Los Osos! I have family friends who retired there 30 years ago. They musta made out good, if they didn’t refi.

Comment by rms
2010-11-08 17:58:18

Los Osos isn’t a “hard scrabble” town, but it’s real close. Everyone I know there drives no less than 20-minutes one way to work, and few of them enjoy benefits that come with metro area employment. However, I like the fresh air and slower paced life there. Every once in a while I tune into an IP radio broadcast from a Cayucos radio station, and it feels like I’m back there.

 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 10:27:58

This article is a year old…I found it during some surfing around the web. But it contains charts showing the residential vs. the commercial real estate bubble collapses. I hadn’t seen a good graph of CRE’s collapse before.

http://www.american.com/archive/2009/september/it-wasnt-a-bubble-it-was-a-double-bubble

The CRE bubble collapsed at a downward rate even faster than did the residential RE bubble.

So much for my friend who bought all that CRE with high leverage back in 2007. :roll:

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-11-08 11:54:57

Tankxs!

My home was worth…
My commercial building was worth…
My savings was once…
We used to have xx number of employees…

GOP: “Extend Shrubs tax credits to the most wealthy, Shazam!-it’ll-solve-EVERYTHING-trust-us!” ;-)

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:50:37

As well as the tax breaks for offshoring jobs.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 11:21:19

I notice Au&Ag are enjoying all the good money pumping news. Go QE2,3,4,etc,etc…

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:03:02

Celebs beware! New Pandora’s box of ‘personal’ drones that could stalk anyone from Brangelina to your own child ~ Daily Mail

They could put your mind at ease - or do very much the opposite.

A new arms race is on and it could change everything from the way we parent to how we get our celebrity gossip.

For the technology currently being used by the CIA to ferret out terrorist leaders in the hills of Pakistan is set to arrive in a neighbourhood near you - and there’s nowhere to hide.
Coming to a sky near you?

Personal drones - smaller, private versions of the infamous Predator - are the next hot technology for people looking to track celebrities, cheating lovers, or even wildlife.

And it could be a dream tool for the paparazzi, named after the Iralian for buzzing mosquitoes.

Now the metaphor is coming to life. Several personal drones are scheduled for completion next year.

Already in the UK police are using drones to track thieves. In February, the Air Robot was deployed by Merseyside police after officers lost an alleged car thief who had escaped on foot in thick fog.

Using the device’s on-board camera and thermal-imaging technology, the operator was able to pick up the suspect through his body heat and direct foot patrols to his location.

It led officers to a 16-year-old youth, who was hiding in bushes alongside the Leeds-Liverpool canal, in Litherland, Merseyside.

The drone, which measures 3ft between the tips of its four carbon fibre rotor blades, uses unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology originally designed for military reconnaissance.

Comment by Kim
2010-11-08 12:48:28

Yeah, but the British don’t carry guns. In the US, flying a personal drone outside of a park or one’s own property would be seen as an opportunity for target practice.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:20:33

LOL! FWIW, Brits do have shotguns. I think its just pistols and revolvers that are impossible to acquire (legally) over there.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 15:50:45

FWIW, Brits do have shotguns.

My cousin certainly had one. He used it on the birds that he didn’t want in his yard. And, since his yard wasn’t near anyone else’s, he could blast away.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 16:17:16

My cousin certainly had one. He used it on the birds that he didn’t want in his yard. And, since his yard wasn’t near anyone else’s, he could blast away.

Why would a Brit not want a lot of birds in his yard?

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 16:21:58

Why would a Brit not want a lot of birds in his yard?

There were certain birds — the Across the Pond equivalent of starlings and grackles — that he didn’t want on his property.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 16:32:16

I was just teasing. The Brit’s slang meaning of “birds”.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:52:17

Big deal. Anyone can buy an RC airplane and equip it with a cheap vid and transmitter these days.

Why does it have to be “custom made?”

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:11:01

Americans’ debt slashing nears $1 trillion

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Americans have paid off nearly $1 trillion in debt over the past two years, although the pace of repayment has slowed, according to a regional Federal Reserve report released Monday.

Total consumer debt was $11.6 trillion as of Sept. 30; down 7.4%, or $922 billion, from the peak reached in the third quarter of 2008, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Consumer indebtedness fell another 0.3% in the third quarter, after a 3.3% decline in the prior quarter.

In addition, total household delinquency rates fell for the second consecutive quarter. The report said 11.1% of outstanding debt was in some stage of delinquency at the end of September — compared to 11.4% on June 30, and 11.6% a year earlier.

“If consumers can continue to repair their balance sheets, that bodes well for the sanity of the economy in the long term,” said economist John Canally of LPL Financial.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 12:18:58

Speaking of which, I dipped into my savings to buy a new camera earlier this year. Had to do it. There was a gig that my entry-level DSLR rig just couldn’t handle.

And today I just popped some savings repayment bucks into the credit union. More to come very soon. (Business has been on the upturn around here.)

Comment by yensoy
2010-11-08 16:50:43

What did you buy?

 
 
Comment by michael
2010-11-08 12:20:52

“paid off” or “walked away from”?

 
Comment by Kim
2010-11-08 12:40:19

“Americans have paid off nearly $1 trillion in debt over the past two years”

Does that include debt discharged in bankruptcy and/or foreclosure?

Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:18:52

Probably

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:54:05

Funny how they don’t specify, isn’t it?

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-11-08 12:13:39
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2010-11-08 15:22:11

Wouldn’t that be nice? Would we get back all the money we put in when we do so?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:19:07

Sounds like the Brits “section 8″ housing system works like a charm.

Mother-of-two lives in Britain’s most expensive council house (valued at £2.5m) for two years… rent free ~ Daily Mail Reporter

Taxpayer-funded: Mother-of-two Ruth Ben-Adir leaves her £2.5m council house in North London, where she has been living rent-free

A mother-of-two who was moved to a £2.5million council property ’so she wouldn’t be disturbed by local building works’ has been living rent-free for more than two years.

Ruth Ben-Adir, 46, moved into the Grade II-listed Victorian lodge - thought to be Britain’s most expensive council house - with her two sons, Kingsley, 24, and Fab, in 2008.

The property - on the edge of a 29-acre estate in Highgate Village, north London - is neighboured by homes owned by celebrities such as George Michael and Sting.

It’s thought the house could fetch £100,000 rent per year if rented out on the private market.

The Ben-Adirs were moved there by Camden Council from nearby Kentish Town after officials decided the refurbishment of a leisure centre next to their home would disturb them.

But work on the centre finished in July - and the family is still living rent-free in the three-bedroom property in Waterlow Park.

The family isn’t paying rent on the house - nor on their original home, where Mrs Ben-Adir is the registered tenant.

Tory opposition leader Andrew Mennear told the Evening Standard: ‘This was a bizarre form of temporary accommodation and it has to come to an end. Did they just forget about them?’

New figures show the council is paying £720,000 a year in housing benefits to just 20 families, with one on £6,565 a month.

Changes to the housing benefits system mean that from April next year there will be caps of £400 a week for a four-bedroom property and £250 a week for a two-bedroom home, leaving up to 10,500 people in London at risk of losing their homes.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:55:29

“It’s thought the house could fetch £100,000 rent per year if rented out on the private market.”

In their DREAMS! :lol:

I really love how so many British news article are fact free and long on speculation.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:25:32

From the 5Min. Forecast…

President Obama faces a choice going into the G-20 meetings starting Thursday in Seoul: He can seek ways to avoid a currency and/or trade war with China… or he can purposely seek one out in a bid to stoke up anti-China fervor and boost his re-election chances.

He may be sincerely seeking the former… but this morning, he appears to be stumbling into the latter.

For starters, he stood next to India’s prime minister in New Delhi and declared he supports India getting permanent membership on the U.N. Security Council.

Of course, that’s guaranteed to anger Pakistan, India’s nuclear-armed archrival, whose support the president needs for his war in Afghanistan. But it’s also guaranteed to anger China — which has had a smoldering border dispute with India for some 50 years.

India has long been freaked out by China’s bases high up in Tibet, looming above India’s plains; decades ago, India’s leader Jawaharlal Nehru complained about it to Mao Zedong’s right-hand man, Chou Enlai.

“If I wanted to destroy India,” Chou was said to reply, “I would march 100 million Chinese to the edge of the Tibetan plateau and order them to piss downhill. We would wash you into the Indian Ocean.”

Old hatreds die hard; is anyone in the White House clued in to this?

Probably not, judging by other developments…

“We can’t continue situations,” declared the president, “where some countries maintain massive [trade] surpluses, other countries have massive deficits and never is there an adjustment with respect to currency that would lead to a more balanced growth pattern.”

So… that sounds as if Obama is going to make a full-court press at G-20 for Tim Geithner’s harebrained scheme to have everyone limit their trade surpluses and deficits to 4% of GDP — the scheme the Chinese dismissed last week as a relic of “planned economies.”

But even as the president spoke those words in New Delhi, Geithner was backing down in Tokyo. At a meeting of Asia-Pacific finance ministers, he said the concept is still sound, but “it’s not something that can reduce easily to a single number.”

Is it too much to ask that these guys get on the same page?

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:33:54

You can make the point that political stability works against the interests of the USA.

We spend a lot of money, blood and energy promoting it, which creates economic competitors, and a stable worldwide transport system.

 
Comment by yensoy
2010-11-08 16:48:44

In related news…

(NYT)

Fed Action Gets an Unexpected Endorsement From India
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and VIKAS BAJAJ

NEW DELHI — When the United States Federal Reserve announced last week that it would buy $600 billion in Treasury bonds to help bolster the economy, it quickly came under attack from Germany, Brazil and China, which said America was trying to devalue the dollar to the detriment of other nations’ exports.

On Monday, the Fed’s plans earned a hearty endorsement from at least one foreign trade partner — India.

“Of all the various countries in the G-20, the one that is least dependent on export-led growth is probably India,” said Suman Bery, director general of the National Council of Applied Economic Research in New Delhi. “India has more to gain by reactivation of the U.S. economy than it has to lose from a depreciation of the U.S. dollar.”

Furthermore, India, unlike other developing nations like Brazil and Thailand, has generally welcomed foreign capital that has flooded into emerging markets in search of higher-yielding assets. India needs foreign investment to help fund its large current account deficit — more than 3 percent of its gross domestic product.

end

Printing money is something Indians know only too well, but governments have been kept in check by inflation triggered protests / lack of voter support. But if someone else is inflating their money and that makes for cheap capital/cheap imports/reduction of deficit in real terms, hey that’s a win-win situation!!

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 17:58:19

Fed Action Gets an Unexpected Endorsement From India

Well, well, well. So THAT’S what it was all about.

China and India are competitions for our business. But they are bitter rivals.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 18:00:55

“…competitors…”

GAH!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by yensoy
2010-11-08 19:29:57

No I think this has less to do with China and India competing for US business (which don’t really overlap) and more to do with India’s import basket becoming cheaper given that most import/commodity prices are pegged in USD. India is somewhat hurt by the Yuan pegging (making Chinese goods cheaper shipped to India than factory production cost of same goods in India itself) which hopefully should decouple with this gambit. Also the general hospitable mood surrounding Obama’s visit.

But don’t kid yourself - Indians know that this won’t end well for the US. Prime Minister Singh used to head India’s “fed” Reserve Bank, and he understands the impact of printing money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 21:33:55

That as well. I agree.

I was just commenting on how this plays the 2 against each other. I didn’t expect that. Something like that, but not that exactly.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by sfrenter
2010-11-08 12:29:03
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:34:17

The High Cost of ‘Free’ Trade: Obama “Doesn’t Understand Fundamental Reality” says Alan Tonelson of the U.S. Business & Industry Educational Foundation and author of The Race to the Bottom.

Obama’s comments (and actions) reflect conventional economic thinking that “everyone benefits” from free trade. But nothing could be further from the truth - at least judging by the “free trade” agreements of the past 20 years, says Alan Tonelson of the U.S. Business & Industry Educational Foundation and author of The Race to the Bottom.

“[President Obama] doesn’t seem to understand — or want to understand — the fundamental reality that doubling exports…does absolutely nothing to generate growth or employment in the U.S.,” Tonelson says. “These open trade policies have dug such a deep debt hole for this economy.”

Rx for ‘Draconian Measures’

Rather than pursuing more free trade agreements, the U.S. needs to make an abrupt about-face so that trade policy becomes an “engine of growth at home, not abroad,” Tonelson says. “On a net basis the U.S. economy has lost big time because higher and higher trade deficits mean lower and lower growth rates, higher and higher unemployment rates and more and more national debt.”

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:25:25

We’re going to flail around for 10 years before the so-called leadership and management in this country admits that they erred in their “free-trade is universally good” dogma.

We’ve thrown one industry after another under the bus during the past 30 years. What’s left is under siege.

Maybe the “Banana Republic” model is the “mean” of political/economic systems, and we are just reverting to it.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 18:02:56

The history of mankind says it is. The lord/serf model has been the most prevalent form of society for the last 13,000 known years.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-08 15:17:02

I think that Obama uttered that nonsense (that offshoring creates jobs in the USA) because he was pandering to the Indians to close the weapons deal they made.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 15:52:06

There is a grain of truth to what he said.

Matter of fact, one of my business vendors is an India-based company that outsources its tech support to the USA. And that tech support office is just a short bike ride away from the Arizona Slim Ranch.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:44:36

STD Test? There’s an App for That

British health officials are hard at work on a new app that will allow users to pee into their cell phones and find out within minutes if they have an STD.

Seriously, we could not make this stuff up if we tried.

According to The Guardian, 4 million pounds have been invested in the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, which is creating a smartphone app that will allow users, “to put urine or saliva on to a computer chip about the size of a USB chip, plug it into their phone or computer and receive a diagnosis within minutes.”

The techno-savvy approached is aimed at young brits, who apparently are too embarrased to visit the doctor face to face and have been experiencing rising rates of STD (or STI as they call them cross the pond).

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-11-08 13:17:17

I’m developing an app to restrict my daughter’s cell phone usage, by having me pee on their phones.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 18:04:20

:lol: I think I’ve hurt myself laughing!

Damn you!

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 12:47:23

CNN) — Twinkies. Nutty bars. Powdered donuts.

For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.

His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most — not the nutritional value of the food.

The premise held up: On his “convenience store diet,” he shed 27 pounds in two months.

For a class project, Haub limited himself to less than 1,800 calories a day. A man of Haub’s pre-dieting size usually consumes about 2,600 calories daily. So he followed a basic principle of weight loss: He consumed significantly fewer calories than he burned.

His body mass index went from 28.8, considered overweight, to 24.9, which is normal. He now weighs 174 pounds.

But you might expect other indicators of health would have suffered. Not so.

Haub’s “bad” cholesterol, or LDL, dropped 20 percent and his “good” cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent. He reduced the level of triglycerides, which are a form of fat, by 39 percent.

“That’s where the head scratching comes,” Haub said. “What does that mean? Does that mean I’m healthier? Or does it mean how we define health from a biology standpoint, that we’re missing something?”

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 13:33:25

Haub’s “bad” cholesterol, or LDL, dropped 20 percent and his “good” cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent. He reduced the level of triglycerides, which are a form of fat, by 39 percent.

Maybe just losing weight helps cholesterol. I lost 10% of my body weight just living in Rio and my cholesterol went from “bad” to “good”.

How and why? IDK Maybe because it’s hot, I walk more and they use the metric system down here.

Comment by m2p
2010-11-08 14:34:54

Add this to the “can’t figure it out file”. Hubby and I tried the Atkins diet for a couple months. He loses 20+ lbs and cholesterol levels went down. I lose maybe 3lbs and my normal 170 cholesterol level went to 230.
Dr. wasn’t happy, so back to normal eating, which for most is a carbo nightmare, and levels are back to normal.

 
 
Comment by Elanor
2010-11-08 14:07:51

Look for his upcoming book, “The Twinkie Diet” to top the best-seller list. ;)

Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 16:04:54

Too bad Dan White isn’t alive or I’m sure he’d buy a copy.

 
 
 
Comment by fisher
2010-11-08 13:27:02

Whoops, now Jesse Ventura is ringing the alarm about The Great Vampire Squid Conspiracy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wRfuAUubT0&feature=player_embedded#!

Kinda late, and kinda lurid to jazz up the complexities for his tv show, but some people won’t get the heads up any other way.

Full disclosure:
I hope Gary Johnson (former NM Gov & noted libertarian) & Jesse team up for a 2012 POTUS run as the Men of Iron, Balls of Steel tour!

Comment by DennisN
2010-11-08 16:08:11

Hey Ahhhnold needs a new job too.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 18:06:52

When it comes to the mass audience, you can never be repetitive enough nor too lurid.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 13:44:31

Attention consumers your chance to load up on cheap crap from China is going to cost you less, good news!

Wal-Mart Fires Shot in Toy War
Retailer Cuts Prices After Learning Target’s Are Lower

The annual battle for the minds and wallets of toy-buying parents has gotten off to a particularly fierce start, with Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT - News) slashing prices in an effort to keep Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT - News) from being the low-cost leader this holiday-shopping season.

Toys are key to many retailers’ success at Christmas, because parents will buy stuff for their kids even when the economy is awful. But in recent years shoppers have tended to snap up the biggest toy bargains and ignore stores’ other offerings.

This year, with economic conditions somewhat improved, retailers are hopeful that if they can lure parents with a great price on electronic hamsters or Stinky the Garbage Truck, shoppers will make other purchases. But store chains continue to feel the need to stake their low-cost claims just days after Halloween.

“It will still be a very competitive season for toys,” said Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners, a retail and consumer consulting firm. “The reason you are seeing so much early discounting is that retailers are trying to get an early share of the market.”

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 18:08:36

Hmmm. I wonder if my landlord would take Transformer payments? Or maybe he prefers Hot wheels or Barbies?

Toy arbitrage isn’t easy.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 13:53:39

‘Arizona Style’ Immigration Law Proposed in Texas
conservative lawmaker files bill in first hour of filing period for 2011 session

Less than an hour after the period began for filing bills for consideration in the 2011 Legislative session, State Rep. Debbie Riddle (R-Tomball), a leader of the newly muscular conservatives in the Legislature, filed an ‘Arizona style’ measure that would crack down on illegal immigration, 1200 WOAI news reports.

Riddle says her measure is a response to what she says is the escalating violence caused by Mexican and Latin American gangs in Texas.

“It is absolutely out of control with the gang related crime, which is going through the roof, so, yes, we are addressing this, and quite frankly, I am not worried about political correctness,” Riddle told 1200 WOAI news.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 18:10:26

This is news to me.

Our biggest problem is more with illegal drunk drivers who kill. Although retail robbery is way up. But that seems to be equal opportunity.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 13:55:22

Fed official raises doubts over new Fed program
Fed official with ties to Bernanke raises doubts over Fed’s $600 billion aid program

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Federal Reserve official with a close working relationship with Chairman Ben Bernanke is expressing skepticism over the Fed’s new $600 billion program to bolster the economy.

Kevin Warsh, a Fed governor, warns that there are “significant risks” associated with the Fed’s bond-buying program, including the potential for triggering inflation.

The Fed’s program, announced last week, is aimed getting Americans to spend more and invigorate the economy by making loans cheaper. But Warsh doubts the program will have “significant” or “durable benefits” for the economy. Despite his reservations, Warsh voted for the program.

During the 2008 financial crisis, Warsh worked closely with Bernanke to craft programs to get credit — the economy’s oxygen — to flow again.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 13:58:21

The Fed’s program, announced last week, is aimed getting Americans to spend more and invigorate the economy by making loans cheaper. But Warsh doubts the program will have “significant” or “durable benefits” for the economy. Despite his reservations, Warsh voted for the program.

Last week, I posted a comment that followed a FireDogLake story. The FDL story commenter had a relative who runs a credit union. Which has all sorts of money, which means that it’s paying next to nada in interest on member accounts.

Relative also reports that there’s very little demand for loans. If people still have jobs, they’re not interested in taking on any more debt. They’re paying down what they already have. And, if they’re out of work, well, no loans for them.

Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 14:19:28

“If people still have jobs, they’re not interested in taking on any more debt”.

Yes, and that is driving BB&Co. nuts. They are seriously pushing on a string now.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-11-08 17:00:48

Bernanke’s latest folly will cost us

By Bill Fleckenstein
MSN Money

With a wave of his magic wand, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke committed to creating $75 billion a month out of thin air through June by buying government paper (or roughly $600 billion in all). That, combined with other buying the Fed is engaged in, comes to a total of almost $900 billion over nine months.

But, you may ask, how does the Fed create money? Isn’t that the Treasury’s job?

In a nutshell, the Fed “prints” money by participating in the bond market. It buys Treasury bonds from other large financial institutions and pays for them by adding credits to the sellers’ accounts at the Federal Reserve (as opposed to transferring actual cash). Poof! New money.

How can the Fed do this? There isn’t room here for the long answer, but the short answer is: Because it is the Fed.

If you didn’t think the Fed was irresponsible enough with its money-out-of-thin-air policies, all doubts should have been laid to rest Nov. 4, when Bernanke took the unusual tack of defending his moves in a Washington Post op-ed piece headlined “What the Fed did and why: Supporting the recovery and sustaining price stability.”

I am not going to go through his entire worthless apologia for the Fed’s actions, but I do want to cover two points: first, his bass-ackward thought process regarding inflation, and second, the Fed’s targeting of stock prices to achieve its goals (and possibly for validation of its policies).

A nonproductive argument
Bernanke goes on to say: “Although low inflation is generally good, inflation that is too low can pose risks to the economy — especially when the economy is struggling. In the most extreme case, very low inflation can morph into deflation.”

Oh, yeah? Says who? I have not seen any instance where a “too low” inflation rate led to deflation. When deflation is caused by new inventions or increased productivity (or in the old days, bumper crops), which we might term “good” deflation, it was not a consequence of too little inflation; it was due to progress. Similarly, the “bad” deflation isn’t created via inflation that is too low; it tends to come from burst bubbles. In other words, misguided policies, not low inflation, are the cause of deflation.

Continued: Put your money where his mouth is

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/ContrarianChronicles/bernankes-latest-folly-will-cost-us.aspx - 65k

 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2010-11-08 14:03:36

Interesting new trend - open source textbooks.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2013373872_textbooks08m.html

“For a community-college student who pays about $3,000 a year in tuition, $1,000 in textbook expenses can make up one-quarter of the overall cost of a two-year degree. The Open Course Library “will fundamentally and significantly reduce the cost of going to college,” Green said.”

“College textbooks are a $10 billion-a-year market, Green said, and publishers are, not surprisingly, wary of Washington’s efforts. When work first started on the Open Source Library, Green said he met with textbook publishers and tried to secure their cooperation.

“I said, ‘This is not about putting you out of business,’ ” Green said. “We’d love to partner with you. … At first, they said, ‘You’re crazy.’ ”

But as publishers realized the state was planning to give away its general-education curriculum for two-year colleges, some began to cooperate, Green said. They began offering to sell electronic versions of texts that expire after a quarter for $30, or offering old versions of books for that price.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-11-08 14:25:06

This guy’s working the same concept into his Khan Academy business model.

Key point from his story:

“We are developing other applications to create repositories of teacher- and student-generated questions (on which we would collect the same metadata and ratings on quality, difficulty, and importance). Between these apps and our 2,000-plus and growing on-demand video library, which is being used by more than a million students a month, there is a genuine opportunity for educational institutions to rethink the system so that it is both more effective and more economical. We have decided to do this as a not-for-profit venture, so that our goal of optimizing learning never conflicts with profit maximization (which leads to the type of behavior we see in publishers).

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-11-08 14:44:10

Magazine names Charleston friendliest city in US
CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Charleston has won another travel honor.

Travel + Leisure Magazine on Monday named Charleston the friendliest city in the nation. The magazine also named the city tops in bed and breakfasts, inns and antique stores.

Last month, Charleston was listed among the nation’s top destinations by readers of Conde Nast Traveler magazine. Charleston placed second behind San Francisco.

About 4 million people visit Charleston each year.

Charleston and the rest of the South Carolina coast are the heart of the state’s $18 billion tourism industry.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2010-11-08 16:18:12

Peter Schiff show on right now. Listen at schiffradio dot com.

He’s going to do battle with Robert Prechter on inflation vs deflation at 6:30 (3:30 PST)

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 16:24:33

Peter Schiff show on right now. Listen at schiffradio dot com.

Thank you. I’m listening to it from Brazil. The world IS smaller now.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-08 16:28:44

Peter Schiff just said…

“(Europe) will be better than America”

woa

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 16:57:38

Back into the vortex we go… WHEEEEEE!!!!!

Ambac cries uncle
Financial crisis still felt with bond insurer in Chapter 11

Shares of Ambac are sucked down into a vortex after hours, losing more than 60% of their value.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 17:03:02

Could be an exciting evening, with the Global DOW plunging on the Ambac bankruptcy news…

Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-11-08 20:01:28

Ambac has been hanging on by the skin of it’s teeth for 2 years.

Buy the dip.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 17:05:10

What color light is the after-hours Ambac news giving stocks? I’m thinking red, but who knows what the PPT can do tomorrow to contain the damage?

Giving Stocks a Green Light
Nov. 8, 2010
The midterm election results and the Federal Reserve’s easy-money moves are bullish for stocks, says Harvey Rowen, chief investment officer at Starmont Asset Management. He talks with MarketWatch’s Jonathan Burton.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-11-08 21:38:47

How big is Ambac? As in percentage of market? How much do they insure?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 17:11:45

* BUSINESS
* NOVEMBER 9, 2010

Ambac Files for Chapter 11

By ERIC MORATH And ERIK HOLM

Ambac Financial Group Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Monday after failing to reach an accord with its debt holders on a prepackaged bankruptcy.

It listed holders of more than $1.62 billion in bonds as its largest unsecured creditors in its filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan.

The filing comes a week after the bond insurer, which sold protection on mortgage securities, said its board had voted to skip a $2.8 million interest payment on senior notes due in 2023. At the time, the company said it planned to file for bankruptcy by year end and had been attempting to negotiate a prepackaged bankruptcy with a group of its senior debt holders.

In a statement late Monday, Ambac said that it was “unable to agree to terms” with the group. But the company and the creditors “agreed to a nonbinding term sheet that will serve as a basis for further negotiations” and could allow Ambac to “emerge from bankruptcy more expeditiously.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 19:38:14

Report: N.C. to shatter foreclosures record with month to spare
Triangle Business Journal - by Lee Weisbecker
Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 10:32am EST

North Carolina will break 2009’s record crop of home foreclosures before the end of November, according to a new study by the Raleigh-based North Carolina Justice Center.

The state is on pace for 70,476 total foreclosure filings this year, outpacing the record of 63,286 set last year, the study says.

“Based on filings through the third quarter of this year, North Carolina projects to break last year’s foreclosure record on Nov. 23 of this year,” the report says.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-08 19:40:14

The Associated Press
November 7, 2010, 12:00PM
Homeowners say loan mods led them to foreclosure
By JACOB ADELMAN
LOS ANGELES

Some struggling homeowners say they’re being unfairly foreclosed on despite making all their payments under trial mortgage modification programs.

They equate that to mistreatment by banks who agreed to help borrowers when they took part in the government’s $700 billion Wall Street rescue.

Attorneys in California, Kentucky, Massachusetts and other states are seeking class-action status for lawsuits accusing banks of breach of contract for not making trial modifications permanent.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post