Bernanke Steps Up Stimulus Defense, Turns Tables on China
Nov. 19 (Bloomberg)
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke took his defense of the U.S. central bank’s monetary stimulus abroad, saying it will aid the world economy, and implicitly criticized China for keeping its currency weak.
The best way to underpin the dollar and support the global recovery “is through policies that lead to a resumption of robust growth in a context of price stability in the United States,” Bernanke said in prepared remarks to a conference later today in Frankfurt. Countries that undervalue their currencies may eventually inhibit growth around the world and risk financial instability at home, he said.
The man is crazy. He wants everyone to do QE along with him. Bailouts for any nation which might topple the house of cards. Can we get rid of this delusional bastard?
Congress can, the President can, he could resign, he could drop dead, but most likely none of it will happen. It appears they all love the show that he is putting on, and The Bernake is very impressed with his own performance.
“Once appointed, Governors may not be removed from office for their policy views. The lengthy terms and staggered appointments are intended to contribute to the insulation of the Board–and the Federal Reserve System as a whole–from day-to-day political pressures to which it might otherwise be subject. If all Governors serve full terms, a President would be able to appoint only two Governors during a four-year presidential term. Moreover, even a President reelected for a second term would not have appointed a majority of the Governors until late in the second term. In reality, many Governors do not complete their fourteen-year terms, and recent Presidents have averaged more than one appointment to the Board every two years.”
For more on this topic, as seen from the perspective of a former Governor, read A term at the Fed : an insider’s view by Laurence H. Meyer. He served during the Clinton years.
I love how they keep saying “the” global recovery, as if it’s already going on. As if saying it will make it so.
His solution for everything is give more money to the banksters. Cure for cancer? - more money for banksters. The Redskins suck? - more money for the banksters. The banksters are robbing the country blind? - more money for the banksters.
Let’s be more specific: Bernanke has a personality disorder. His policies are a complete failure. His ideas are stupid. He has no clue what caused the GD, or this one. He has the highest maintenance beard I think I have ever seen.
This is kinda fun. Voters lash back at DC, with neither party trusted. Republicans denounce the Fed, Fed knocks China, many central banks attack Fed, trade uneasiness all around, unemployment stuck on high, deficits, unpopular wars.
It was all so peaceful once. The US borrowed and spent, aided by 2 decades of bubbles, globalism polutes, makes stuff and buys some of that debt. Meanwhile, the citizens watch half-billion $ bombers blow up goat herders/rusty mini-vans on the flat screen and feel assured of their unending superiority. It all worked so well until it didn’t!
Now the head clown says this:
‘Bernanke said sluggish U.S. growth, falling inflation and an unemployment rate that has hovered near 10 percent for months convinced Fed policymakers they needed to pump in more stimulus. “On its current economic trajectory, the United States runs the risk of seeing millions of workers unemployed or underemployed for many years,” he said in his speech. “As a society, we should find that unacceptable.”
Here’s the thing; back in 2005, as we got our head around the housing bubble, it didn’t take much to see that massive dislocations in the economy (jobs) were going to be the result. And we still don’t see our “leaders” addressing this directly.
I’ve got a message for the Fed and DC, like the Southpark guy says: “Bubbles are bad, mmm-kay”.
And the Fed was a big player in creating this mess, saying all along that bubbles couldn’t be seen and it wasn’t their “business” to address bubbles in any event. What’s the Fed position on bubbles now? And if we can’t get an answer on that key point, why shouldn’t we kick their sorry ass to the curb?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2010-11-19 08:38:49
I gotta agree, Ben. I still believe quite strongly that the troubles were caused by the policies which allowed banks to monopolize and jobs to be exported. You aren’t going to solve this mess with currency tweaks. You have to go to the souce: break up the bank monoplies and start slapping tarriffs on stuff that can and should be made in the US. Smoot Hawley might actually work this time.
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-19 09:34:37
“What’s the Fed position on bubbles now?”
Don’t ask — don’t tell.
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2010-11-19 11:48:25
“Meanwhile, the citizens watch half-billion $ bombers blow up goat herders/rusty mini-vans on the flat screen and feel assured of their unending superiority.”
This is the MAIN reason I voted for Obama. I want us out of the middle east, period. It’s an absolute embarrassment.
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-11-19 15:01:58
“This is the MAIN reason I voted for Obama.”
How is that working out for you?
Comment by zeus mateus
2010-11-19 15:43:57
“….why shouldn’t we kick their sorry ass to the curb?”
Whew, thank the Lord. It’s about time there was another country the rest of the world can blame things on and shake down. It’s really getting old having the US be the planet’s evil bugger. Hurrah! We can all be a victim of China now, even the US! Dang! It was just SO tiring being the cause of all the evil in the world and having to pay everyone to be our friend.
The US seems to be the only one blaming China; the rest of the world is scared of it
Just look at what happened during the G20 summit. Not a single country supported the US denouncing the currency manipulation by the Chinese; however, everyone criticized the US for what Bernanke did.
Could it be that *gasp* China is becoming as influential as the US?
China seems to be able to get away with anything they do just by denying:
Currency manipulation? It wasn’t me.
Cyber terrorism? It wasn’t me.
Illegal subsidies by the government? It wasn’t me.
Violation of trade agreements? It wasn’t me.
etc, etc
And no one can do anything about it… The Chinese are the new untouchables
The Federal Reserve’s traditional “no comment” relationship with the dollar is proving as challenging to sustain as the currency pegs of nations like China.
For many years, nearly any dollar-related question put to a central banker resulted in a referral to the authority of the Treasury Department, the nation’s officially designated dollar-policy advocate. But as an agreement between the two institutions, the deal was always a bit of a curiosity. The Federal Reserve is the ultimate arbiter of the nation’s money supply and inflation rate. Treasury secretaries may have goals for the dollar — usually, they say they want it strong — but it’s the Fed that has the power to make or break the buck.
Ever since the Fed kicked off its $600 billion Treasury buying program, global blowback has forced central bankers to break with this arrangement and take on dollar issues, if reluctantly. The responses have been all over the map, but they are talking — and that’s of note by itself. Some observers say that despite the increased chatter, officials continue to sidestep how central the dollar is to their policy aims.
A sampling of recent Fed talk finds them on the defensive about this issue, pushing back against notions that their policies are aimed at weakening the U.S. currency.
“We’re not trying to push the dollar to any particular level,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley told CNBC Tuesday. “We don’t have a view about where … the dollar should go,” he said, in an interview that said overseas leaders should be grateful for the U.S. pursuing a policy that will return the nation to health.
Newly installed Fed vice chair, Janet Yellen, told the Wall Street Journal this week the Fed isn’t trying “to push down the dollar” or to start a currency war, as some overseas officials have suggested.
Meanwhile, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said Wednesday that while the Fed isn’t trying to depress the dollar per se, textbook economics would suggest that “a modest currency depreciation is the normal consequence of easing monetary policy.” Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota said Thursday he doesn’t see “big effects” on the dollar from current Fed policy, in a speech where he offered support for the bond-buying program.
The Fed’s leader, Ben Bernanke, has also entered the fray. His highly anticipated address Friday punched back at international critics who think the central bank policy is an unfair manipulation of foreign exchange markets. Emerging economies like China, with its peg to the dollar, are pursuing a “strategy of currency undervaluation” that prevents a needed rebalancing of global economic variables, Bernanke said. If he can say other currencies need to rise in this way, it suggests he’s comfortable with a dollar drop.
…
We will see… State and local governments have too many dependents, gonna be hard to just say no…
New Republican Governors Promise After Elections Cuts Are `Going to Hurt’
The nation’s Republican governors and governors-to-be met for the first time since the Nov. 2 election that gave their party control of 29 statehouses, promising to address budget deficits by chopping the size of government.
“Why do you exist?” Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Corbett said that he would ask every state agency when he spoke yesterday at the Republican Governors Association meeting in San Diego. New Mexico Governor-elect Susana Martinez said she would reduce the public payroll by 5 percent through attrition to deal with a deficit she said recently nearly doubled to $452 million on $5.6 billion in revenue next year.
Democrats held 26 governorships before the election. The Republican victories increased the party’s influence before the 2012 presidential election and gave it more sway over the redrawing of congressional districts and in policies of states trying to recover from the recession.
South Carolina Governor-elect Nikki Haley, a state representative, said she beat candidates with more name recognition by telling voters that she would reduce the size of government.
“We need to be honest and say, ‘This is going to hurt,’” said Haley, when asked how she will explain cuts. “We are heading into a terrible budget year.”
It’s been a long, slow trip, but we truly have gone from the concept of “the consent of the governed” (Declaration of Independence) to begging, petitioning, or lobbying for the government’s consent. The governing elite, in concert with the bankers, have become our masters. The passage of TARP and Obamacare against the wishes of the majority are the big examples, but government’s reach extends even to trivial matters like outlawing trans-fats and toys in Happy Meals.
The DOI also prescribes the fix: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
The only question is, will the abolition come about peacefully or by bloody force?
Also, looks like Big Sis at DHS has rolled over for the pilots and aircrews. They won’t be scanned or groped anymore. Incredibly stupid to start with, they don’t need a frigg’n bomb to crash a plane.. they are *flying* it. Just shows how dumb these tweaks that are “defending our safety” really are. Unreal. The only remedy is vote with your feet. Just say no fly.
Comment by GH
2010-11-19 16:52:55
Personally, I really want to see security stepped up with young children. We are definitely a lot safer knowing little Jonny is being strip searched as well.
Seriously though, talk about a brain dead policy. Seems like another assault on our freedom in the name of supposed security. Osama bin laden must be laughing all day long any more to see us the way we have become. The way he wanted us to be.
“Why do you exist?” Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Corbett said that he would ask every state agency when he spoke yesterday at the Republican Governors Association meeting in San Diego.
I sure hope he asks that of PA’s antiquated State Store system. That’s where you have to go to buy wine and hard liquor. The selection is abysmal, the service even more so.
How many states have this system or something similar (in MD the stores themselves are independent, but they have to use the state as their only wholesaler)?
The New Hampshire state liquor stores seemed fine when my parents used them, but then they only used the ones right near the boarder and they were competing with the private MA stores.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-19 09:45:03
It’s better than the Texas method of dry counties, dry cities, and dry school districts. Liquor stores are few and far between.
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-19 10:35:17
I understand the have them in Utah, staffed by little old LDS ladies who keep an eye out for any of the flock who might wander into the shop.
Comment by In Montana
2010-11-19 14:35:26
‘It’s better than the Texas method of dry counties,’
That sure caught me off guard when I moved there in 1979. Long drive through the panhandle, and I thought I could pick up some beer at a C-store, lol. I had to wait until I got to the city of Dallas, where the stores were lined up chock a block on the main drags.
Montana has state stores, and also lets some bars and casinos sell package liquor. State is the wholesaler I guess.
Comment by potential buyer
2010-11-19 15:03:08
I think Utah has just done away with having to have a sponsor if you want to go in a bar. I guess people just snagged someone walking in and asked them to be their sponsor. How stupid is that?
Comment by Kim
2010-11-19 15:16:34
“I guess people just snagged someone walking in and asked them to be their sponsor.”
Yup. I was skiing in Utah with my family. When my parents ordered a beer, the waitress turned around and said, “See those two men at the bar? They’re your sponsors.”
I think everyone has a similar tale to tell about Utah.
Comment by Spokaneman
2010-11-19 15:20:54
Texas has (or had I haven’t been there for a while) very odd liquor laws. Cities, or even precincts could have local option elections.
The city where I went to College, Denton, was dry as was the county, so any beer, wine or hard liquor had to be purchased in the wet parts or Dallas, about 45 miles south.
An enterprising lawyer set up a trailer park just outside Denton, moved in a bunch of rental trailers , incorporated the thing into a town, held a local option election and viola, was selling beer, wine and hard liquor 5 miles outside the Denton City limits. That all happened about the time I was graduating in 1971, so I’m not sure how long he had the monopoly, but I’m sure he made a fortune.
In those days, even Dallas only had a few wet precincts. Lots of places were wet on one side of the road and dry on the other. I would imagine it has changed in the intervening 40 years.
Obama foreclosure-prevention effort struggles as more than half falling out of program.
WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half of the 1.4 million homeowners who enrolled in the Obama administration’s flagship foreclosure-prevention program have fallen out.
The program is intended to help those at risk of foreclosure by lowering their monthly mortgage payments. But the latest report from the Treasury Department shows that the effort is still plagued by high failure rates.
Approximately 755,000 borrowers, or 54 percent of those who tried to get their payments lowered through the program, have been cut loose through October. That compared to a 53 percent disqualification rate through September.
More than 36,300 homeowners, or 34.6 percent who had enrolled in the program, had received permanent loan modifications and were making their reduced mortgage payments on time. That was up slightly from around 34 percent in the previous report.
Actually, considering how bad the finances of many FBs are, 34% seems pretty good to me. Suspiciously good indeed. If we check back in two years, I wouldn’t be surprised if the re-default rate of that 34% is something like 50%. And it is the upon that re-default rate that we’ll ultimately judge this program. Frankly, the ability to determine quickly that more than half of the FBs that apply are beyond saving is a GOOD thing.
Do you really think it will take two years to get to that? Given how reluctant the banks were to give anyone a permanent modification, I wouldn’t be surprised if an outsized number of those in the 34% got their modifications very, very recently. Is there any info on the median number of months that 34% has been making their new payments? If the modifications were using that 31% of gross income number, they may fall off the wagon very quickly.
Well two years wasn’t intended so much to be a lower bound but an upper one. Certainly considering the high DTI’s allowed, I expect many to fail quickly. But those who have the ability and inclination to make payments for two years are pretty likely to continue to do so.
If the modifications were using that 31% of gross income number, they may fall off the wagon very quickly.
And, polly, didn’t you make the point that 31% of your gross income is like 66% of your net?
I’d venture to say that such figures are typical of a lot of people. And two thirds of net income is one heckuva lot to spend on a wigwam.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2010-11-19 09:10:31
Yup. My guess is that anyone with more than two of the following expenses would be in real trouble under that sort of payment: child care expenses, car payments, large commuting costs other than car payments, significant student loans, uninsured medical payments, aiding elderly parents, college expenses, home repairs. I’m sure others could come up with more. Now, I was doing a very rough estimate and I live in a state/county with high income taxes, but 31% of gross has to be pushing the edge for many people. Really pushing.
If you could figure out a way to get the permanent modification first and then have a huge increase in income, it might work long term. Of course, if a lot of people were seeing huge increases in their incomes, there would be fewer defaults in the first place.
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2010-11-19 09:54:22
My guess is that anyone with more than two of the following expenses would be in real trouble under that sort of payment
Absolutely true, Polly.
My wife and I have a PITI of just about 25% of our gross, and with our second kid heading into daycare, we going to have to cut down on our 401(k) contributions and stop our mortgage overpayment (we pay extra every month currently) to cover the second kid.
We owe no debt besides the mortgage, and our commutes are 3 miles and 15 miles. Adding the second kid immediately put us into careful budgeting/expense cutting. If we had to make payments on our two cars or had student loans, we would turn into ‘paycheck to paycheck’ people instead of struggling to keep our savings rate north of 10%.
Doing the budget for the second kid is what REALLY opened my wife’s eyes to the downside of owning, especially in a bubble.
Comment by polly
2010-11-19 11:11:15
Well, I’m not going to say I’m glad to hear it, but I am at least relieved to hear that I wasn’t crazy to come up with that analysis. Good for you for keeping up most of the 401k payments. And remember that after school programs are probably cheaper than full on daycare, so there will be some improvement a few years down the line.
Gosh, I think I was hoping deep down inside that someday someone would contradict me on that one. Darn.
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2010-11-19 11:46:55
I’m pretty sure people could swing 31%, even with extra expenses. But they’d be economizing and living paycheck to paycheck. And strangely, it feels like about half the population is OKAY with living hand to mouth like that. So for them, 31% might even be a minor benefit as the money they are spending on the mortgage acts as a minor form of savings (Assuming the value of their house doesn’t crater, etc etc etc.) and they were just going to spend it anyway on nicer versions of whatever they had to economize on.
Comment by polly
2010-11-19 14:36:52
But living paycheck to paycheck means that they are going to end up trying to live on social security. Live on it. My parents volunteer with seniors who try to do that. They refer a lot of folks to the local food pantries.
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2010-11-19 15:06:10
In theory, living paycheck to paycheck because of a mortgage in your twenties and thirties isn’t terrible, as you expect your income to increase and your mortgage to decrease, allowing you to start socking away retirement as your income grows.
That doesn’t seem to be the case for serial house purchasers/refinancers/etc who whenever they get breathing room realize they could afford a bigger house or pull out equity for a dream vacation.
The people living paycheck to paycheck because of credit card debt/etc are in even worse shape.
Obama foreclosure-prevention effort struggles as more than half falling out of program.
It continues to amaze me how much the politicians DON’T get it and how persistent their ignorance is.
I don’t know much about economics, but I was able to find this blog in 2006 and it didn’t take long to see that the combined wisdom here was fairly accurate - why is it so damn hard to get political advisers with the same level of cluefulness?
HAMP isn’t “struggling.” HAMP is doing a fine job of separating the wheat from the chaff.
Although, now that Fannie/Freddie own most of it, why not let Fannie/Freddie decide who’s worthy of saving, instead giving kickbacks to the (still) greedy banks to be the gatekeepers? Is it a “government takeover of the mortgage market?” You bet your butt. And why not? The government bought the mortgage market as surely as Gordon Gekko bought Teledyne Paper.
In response to my statement “[t]he real key to a good litigator is to be able to cut through the bs and evaluate the true value of the claim, convince the otherside it is worth somewhat more, and settle at FMV or a slight premium” REhobbyist wrote “[s]o to be a good litigator is to be a lying salesman?”
As to whether being a good litigator is dependent on being a good salesperson, of course the answer is “yes.” As to the lying aspect, of course I do not manufacture evidence or encourage false testimony, nor would doing so be in your best interests if you plan on mantaining your career. Most lawsuits include components that have no precise value (e.g., the value of human life, pain and suffering, lost profits, etc.) and some components that you may have a reasonable basis for requesting but know in advance you may not be granted (e.g., punitive and consequential damages, recovery of attorney’s fees, etc.). As between the client and their attorney, I believe the attorney should counsel the client on what they believe the true value of the claim is to manage expectations and to help decide what settlement amount would be fair. In doing so, you always have to take into the account the chance that you will lose the case (you never know what evidence may emerge to blindside you, or exactly what people will say on the stand, no matter how much you prepare) or that, even if you win, damages awarded will not be best case scenario for you. As between the attorney and opposing counsel, however, you have a duty to be an advocate for your client. As long as you have a reasonable basis for believing your claims or defenses have merit, you shouldn’t be working on the case and you would be a pretty lousy attorney if didn’t project the image that you expect to win on all claims. It is part of the business, and those involved know the rules. Are you saying that you believe it is lying to not to disclose to opposing counsel what you view as the biggest weaknesses in your case, the minimum amount your client would accept, and that even though you have a reasonable basis to make some claims you are not sure you will prevail? If you believe opposing counsel is not as sharp, not paying attention to the case, or for some other reason not doing the best job possible, do you believe you have a duty to help them out so that the actual outcome equals your expected mean outcome going into the case (perhaps even drafting their briefs and motions if necessary)? That is contary to American jurisprudence. Perhaps there was just a misunderstanding in that you read my statement regarding convincing the otherside that your claim is worth more than your expected mean means manufacturing evidence, as opposed to projecting an image that you expect the best case scenario for your client to occur. One is illegal, and the other duty bound.
I agree I have seen fees charged that were greater than the value added. They are, however, determined by the market. Fees of $400 or more an hour or usually reserved for seasoned partners at major lawfirms working on major cases, although there are exceptions. The path to get there is not easy. To get your foot in the door as an associate it is expected that you graduate from a top lawschool near the top of your class and work 70 hour work weeks under extreme stress. Most people cannot handle it or decide it is not worth it to them. Most successful partners have made work their number one priority, more often than not at the expense of their family and/or social lives.
Except that my firm was billing me out at $400 in 1997 as a mid level associate. Partners in high end firms were billing out at close to $1000 an hour then. It is certainly a lot higher now.
my company engaged a tax attorney that was $ 850 per hour.
he was well worth it. he was a monet and the IRS code was his canvas.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2010-11-19 08:13:08
little anecdote about him.
my old boss and i had a 10 minute conversation with him one time about a “what if” transaction. i wrote a one page memo based on his thoughts.
three years later…my company actually followed through on the transaction. his firm was no longer working with my company so my new boss used a big four accounting firm.
three senior big four partners worked on a memo discussing the tax treatment of the transaction. my nwe boss asked me to review their memo. i read it and and then dusted off the old memo from that tax attorney.
a major issue he pointed out was not even mentioned in their memo. when we pointed it out to them they had to go back and completely re-work their conclusions.
i must add though…smart as that guy was…he was one of the bigger dorks i have ever met.
Comment by Steve J
2010-11-19 09:47:56
Enrons legal team was worth every penny.
Comment by Natalie
2010-11-19 11:14:22
“i must add though…smart as that guy was…he was one of the bigger dorks i have ever met.”
Tax and engineering are some of the few areas in which looking somewhat geeky is an asset. You would be surprised, or maybe not, by the number of people that presume intelligence based on a geeky appearance. And yes, if you are going to engage is sophisticated financial transactions, the quality of your attorney is extremely important.
Tax and engineering are some of the few areas in which looking somewhat geeky is an asset.
Tell me about it!
My dad’s an engineer. Wearing matching socks is quite the challenge.
Comment by DennisN
2010-11-19 12:25:53
I’m a (retired) patent attorney, having gone to law school after working 18 years as a EE type. How geeky is that? Patent attorneys have the geekiness of an engineer added to a geekiness of a transactional-specialist lawyer.
A good friend’s base rate is $450/hour. We used him professionally once for a billed hour.
He made a cooked $20,000 over billing disappear, as in Poof.
“…Most lawsuits include components that have no precise value (e.g., the value of human life, pain and suffering, lost profits, etc.)”
“…As between the attorney and opposing counsel, however, you have a duty to be an advocate for your client. As long as you have a reasonable basis for believing your claims or defenses have merit, you shouldn’t be working on the case and you would be a pretty lousy attorney if didn’t project the image that you expect to win on all claims. It is part of the business, and those involved know the rules.”
Natalie & Polly
All I know about the perils of lawyering is based on a true incident recalled by a friend: Woman/wife cheated on Man/husband…at some point in the “subsequent legal process” to legally divide & distribute accumulated wealth, Man follows wife to her lawyers office, pulls out gun,…shoots lawyer…lawyer dies. Shooter said: “I hate my wife, I hate her lawyer even more.”
Same thing happened in a Fort Worth court room 15 years ago. I am always surprised by how nice and pleasant the sheriff’s deputies that run the metal detectors are as compared to the TSA. And they know a lot of the people passing through are serious criminals.
Perfect posts are for uptight type-a, spell-checkers with less thought put into what they say then how they say it. I try for at least three typos in all my posts.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-11-19 11:45:04
Grampa used to say “If I were perfect, then I wouldn’t have any friends.”
He should have used “than”.
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-19 13:07:45
Perfect posts are for uptight type-a, spell-checkers with less thought put into what they say then how they say it
I think Your wrong, Its Important too Get it rite;
I believe lawyers, for the most part, only reflect the will of their client.
To that end, we will not get medical costs under control short of overt rationing (either by wealth or some other means) until we stop perpetuating a system where you tell doctors you are at risk to lose everything you ever worked for unless you order every test and every procedure conceivable regardless of cost (which is usually someone else’s money)….
A doctor - ie some may get doctors who ration more or less. People might change doctors to get a doctor who rations less. Is a doctor more or less likely to ration when he is busy or when they need to be somewhere else?
An insurance company - Worst option, insurance companies would say no tx for most things. It would be based on cost not effectiveness.
A national health plan that uses an open cost benefit analysis that any patient can access to determine what the country will pay for.
A decade and half ago, I started working in intensive care with the goal of practicing the best cost effective and evidenced based medicine, trying to persuade others from inefficient use of resources focusing on well established guidelines.
After reading and hearing about experiences of fellow specialists and facing a few (unsuccessful) plantiff’s attorneys, I can tell you that nobody gives you a medal for the most cost effective care: Patients are unhappy for tests not done, medications not prescribed. You feel bad for unhappy patients. Your hospital would be happier with more services/billings.
Rationing will come, the question is how bad will it be. It very well may end up as a co-payment based system so patients will ration their own care (or their economic system will do it for them).
Patients are unhappy for tests not done, medications not prescribed.
I guess I’ve been a pay-my-own way gal for far too long. Because if I had someone like mariner22 as my doctor, I’d be dancing in the streets.
Reason: A test not done is a test that I don’t have to schlepp myself to. Or pay for. Same thing for meds not prescribed. That’s a trip to the pharmacy I don’t have to take. And money I don’t have to spend.
I did a customer service training once called “Ugly Orange” or something like that. In it, two parties must come to an agreement about an order of ugly oranges that must be split between the two parties. Both people in this exercise are given a goal and working parameters. My partner and I negotiated the split in about 2 minutes, exceeding both of our goals and completing the task the fastest, because we both laid out everything up front and discussed each others needs and wants openly.
I think I was 19 or so at the time, and that stuck with me big time. I have no idea how it contributes to this thread. Thank you.
Now try the same thing but you and your partner will have lawyers to help you - result - lawyers get the best oranges, and you and your partner get to split the last one, which is now rotten because it took 4 times as long to come to ageement.
Yesterday Natalie had a problem with Polly’s post regarding “bad guy” and “good guy” in civil suits. That’s the way I would think, too, because I presume that regardless of which side an attorney is on he would know the merits of the suit and where his client stood. That’s why I’m glad I went to graduate school and medical school instead of law school. I don’t ever have to deal with the bad guy - only the patient and their disease.
That said, I’ve noticed that my lawyer friends and relatives become more cynical or maybe blind as they age, and ultimately stop seeing the world in bad/good, and care more about winning.
Very few lawyers have the luxury of selecting their clients. If you work for major law firm most of your clients are institutional, and your job is to do your best to represent them or move on. Just as I am sure you get numb to death, lawyers get numb to emotional attachments and learn not to trust anyone except themselves. Since work often consumes them, their ego is tied to their success and reputation, and it is one of the few things they can try to control. I’m not saying it is a good thing. I’m just saying it happens.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mariner22
2010-11-19 14:15:37
“Very few lawyers have the luxury of selecting their clients?” Excuse me, no one forces you to take any client. Well, perhaps the pro bono assignments by judges that you see on TV shows which I doubt happens regularily in real life.
Doctors who work in emergency/intensive care - now we really have no choice in taking whoever needs our help.
Comment by Natalie
2010-11-19 16:32:35
“Excuse me, no one forces you to take any client.” Big firm politics usually dictate what deals I work on (and that I drop everything to help institutional clients having an emergency), how much I have to charge (which in itself is limiting), and how many hours I need to bill. In addition, if you are dependant on feeder clients or fellow partners for work, if you reject what they feed you, you are likely to be replaced. Also, if you decide you dislike a client after you have started working on a matter, getting out of it raises a whole host of legal and office politics issues. Very few attorneys that do what I do are in a position where they can say I only want to work on X types of deals with Y types of clients - and have their wishes realized.
[t]he real key to a good litigator is to be able to cut through the bs and evaluate the true value of the claim, convince the otherside it is worth somewhat more, and settle at FMV or a slight premium
What do you think of attorneys who have billboards by the freeway promising “I’ll fight for you”, or “I’ll be your pitbull!”, etc?
Sometimes you can survive on your reputation and specialty, and sometimes you have to advertise. I try to survive on my reputation and specialty. I wouldn’t judge an attorney based soley on their advertisements, but I certainly would take it into account.
“Thankfully the hedonically adjusted fiction story released by the Bureau of Lying Statistics came in with a “gasp” indication of more disinflation which caused everyone on Bubblevision this morning to have a joint Fedgasm about how prescient Bernanke was to inflate more money into the system just to bail out the banksters. As long as you do or buy anything outside of eating, driving, getting medical care, or paying for your schooling, then there is no threat of inflation. Thank you Saint Benron for saving us”!
* OPINION
* NOVEMBER 19, 2010
What’s Really Behind Bernanke’s Easing? My guess is that the Fed chairman knows that we still have too many banks overstuffed with toxic real estate loans and derivatives.
By ANDY KESSLER
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s $600 billion quantitative easing program has been roundly criticized in this country and around the world. So why is he doing it? Does he know something the rest of us don’t?
Mr. Bernanke claimed earlier this month in a Washington Post op-ed that “higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending.” But, as Mr. Bernanke must know, the Japanese have been trying to influence their stock market for 20 years, with little effect on their economy. It is also unlikely, as some claim, that the Fed chairman is whipping up a stealth stimulus or orchestrating a currency devaluation. He knows these have been tried and are more likely to destroy jobs than create them.
I have a different explanation for the Fed’s latest easing program: Without another $600 billion floating through the economy, Mr. Bernanke must believe that real estate (residential and commercial) would quickly drop, endangering banks.
The 2009 quantitative easing lowered mortgage rates and helped home prices rise for a while. But last month housing starts plunged almost 12%. And in September, according to Core-Logic, home prices dropped 2.8% from 2009. Commercial real estate values are driven by job-creation and vacancy rates, both of which are heading the wrong way.
Because of unexpectedly bad construction loans, the staid Wilmington Trust was sold to M&T Bank earlier this month in a rare “takeunder”—what Wall Street calls a deal done below a company’s stock value, in this case by 40%.
In other words, real estate is at risk again. But Mr. Bernanke would create a panic if he stated publicly that, if not for his magic dollar dust, real estate would fall off a cliff.
…
Federal Reserve Inc. (person) = “TrueWizardCorporation™”
Bungee-cord Theory = 1
Rope-around-the-Throat = 0
That’s just the way it’s gonna be Mr. Bear / Cantankerous-Bomb-Thrower / withered Green Shoots MegaBank mortgage kudzu…
Invasive species:
(Mortgage Kudzu was introduced from Japan into the United States in 1990 and is now common throughout most of the southeastern United States. Prior to 2006 Mortgage Kudzu had been spreading at the rate of 2,150,000 loans annually.)
The Fed is not pumping money in to the housing market to prevent if from falling. The Fed is pumping money into the banks, which have already failed, to keep them animated like holiday lawn balloon characters.
Ten-four on the lawn characters. Don’t forget it allows the banks to remain highly “profitable” which makes for large executive bonuses insuring the banks don’t lose “talent” to other ventures.
Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) — Cities across the Rust Belt, saddled with abandoned properties under their control as owners stop paying taxes, are choosing to tear down some buildings rather than sell them as residents move to the suburbs and steel, automotive and manufacturing jobs disappear. Bloomberg’s Monica Bertran reports. (Source: Bloomberg)
Cities Burying ‘Dead’ by Demolishing Homes
Cleveland has lost more than half its population since 1950 as the decline of steel, automotive and manufacturing jobs forced residents to leave for parts of the U.S. where employment was growing. Photographer: David Levitt/Bloomberg
Cleveland’s population has been shrinking for 60 years as the city lost manufacturing jobs. Now, after more than 33,000 foreclosures since 2005, it’s demolishing hundreds of deserted, derelict homes.
An agency started last year to manage abandoned houses in Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, plans to acquire as many as 1,000 properties next year, and tear down as many as 900 of them. The city of Cleveland may raze double that amount, according to Gus Frangos, president of Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corp.
“You really have to bury the dead right now,” Frangos said in a telephone interview. “You have to remove blight. It’s unfortunately on a grand scale.”
…
From the article:
“For Sun Belt cities such as Phoenix, where there likely will be greater growth than in Cleveland and Detroit, the more practical strategy may be to hold on to homes until the real estate market recovers, said Terry Schwarz, director of Kent State University’s Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative in Cleveland.”
Here in Phoenix (aka ‘Nuevo Detroit) they’ll be holding on a long time.
Well the the surplus housing stock in the bubbly sun belt IS newer than the surplus housing stock in the rustbelt. But the evidence is that there is a large surplus nonetheless.
See that’s just silly, what Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corp ought to do is “partner” with the local Catholic Churches, give ‘em the houses for free, then have the Pope make x1 brief call to GoldenmanSucks.
(Hwy helps hang the banner: “Doing God’s work,…all together!”)
Ex GF in urban Cleveland (living in mom’s house , presently in estate limbo) now has 4 vacant homes directly across from her; 2 bank owned and boarded up, 2 abandoned and beyond hope, soon, all to become parking lots. All were occupied 2 years ago.
Once the re-undeveloped land has been washed of title problems and environmental liability by the Cleveland tax foreclosure process, I wonder what the city will ask for it. I could see buying up a lot of little parcels as part of a long-term speculative venture. I sure would not want anything that still had a house on it, though.
Ohio still has quite the manufacturing base. And, if the land were free of major problems — being a Superfund site, for instance — I’ll bet that more than a few manufacturers would be interested in it.
Dallas-Fort Worth home foreclosure filings hit a record in 2010 – but not by much.
For all of this year, 63,835 homes have been posted for foreclosure in the four-county area, Foreclosure Listing Service said Thursday. That’s only 4 percent higher than 2009’s total.
Foreclosure postings in North Texas were up more than 20 percent in 2009 and 17 percent in 2008.
“The rate of increase has slowed, and it looks like 2010 is kind of the pivotal year as far as foreclosures here are concerned,” said George Roddy, president of the Addison-based foreclosure-tracking firm. “But they are still going to be high into 2011.”
…
U.S. homeowners are dropping out of the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention program at a faster rate than they are joining it, according to figures released today by the U.S. Treasury Department.
Borrowers aided by the Home Affordable Modification Program grew to nearly 520,000 in October, up 23,750 from a month earlier, the Treasury said in its monthly report. The increase was less than five percent. A total of 36,300 borrowers have dropped out of the plan for failing to make their payments, an increase of 24 percent from a month earlier.
At a congressional hearing earlier in the day, lawmakers said HAMP, which pays lenders to modify loans and reduce monthly payments for struggling borrowers, isn’t doing enough to help homeowners falling behind on their mortgages amid high unemployment and depressed real estate values.
“It’s safe to say that HAMP isn’t meeting its goal of preventing foreclosures,” Representative Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, said at a House Financial Services subcommittee hearing after the Treasury provided a preview of the report.
…
Talks between major lenders and state attorneys general about the nationwide investigation of foreclosure practices are accelerating, with state officials pushing for an overhaul of the loan-modification process that would be much broader than a crackdown on the use of “robo signers,” people familiar with the situation said.
Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit on Thursday held its first face-to-face meeting in Iowa with the multistate group involved in the investigation. Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller is spearheading the probe. Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. have recently picked up the pace of their talks or are planning to meet soon with key officials in the probe.
…
Members of Congress criticized federal regulators for failing to recognize problems with the nation’s foreclosure system before they were brought to light by media reports, and they called for an examination into whether these issues present a systemic risk to the financial system.
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) during a House subcommittee hearing said that a newly created group of senior financial regulators, known as the Financial Stability Oversight Council, should assess the potential impact on the broader economy.
“Why is it you don’t know how these systems work that you regulate? That’s the big question among members on both sides of the aisle,” Waters said.
…
You know, I’m not in the “The bubble was caused by interventions into the free market,” school, but THIS is stupid. The politicians were, for the most part, hell-bent on preventing any any sort of intervention that might have slowed the formation of the bubble. When Armado Falcon (head of the OFHEO, the regulator for Fannie and Freddie) released a report pointing out the systemic risk that they posed he was out of a job THAT VERY DAY. When some states tried to go after either shady mortgage writers, or the crazy bond securitizers, they were quickly forced to back off in the name of federal preemption. The regulator were “hands off” because that’s what the politicians wanted. So this is a case of “How dare you do what I tell you to!”
RE yesterdays UE benefits indefinite extension discussion:
I personally don’t even consider Government assistance an option. Who are all these people that just give up on taking care of themselves by the millions and expect someone else to take care of them? If I were broke, homeless, naked, and starving I would figure something out and take care of myself one way or another. What is wrong with people these days? What happened to innovation and hard work? The basic building blocks of America. If you see me lying in a ditch somewhere, do not feel sorry for me - to only means I exhausted every possible option. Survival isn’t ever guaranteed by anybody. You are responsible.
I pledge Allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America
and to the Victims for which it stands,
one nation unemployed,
it`s not your fault, it`s the evil corporations who outsourced the jobs
with Liberty and Justice for all the people who didn`t know what they were signing and thought real estate only went up
*(the word god has been removed because that might upset someone who is already angry about getting their turban frisked)*
The exception would be those, like my 53-year-old sister, who are truly unemployable. She has never collected unemployment or disability or any other type of assistance, as she is paranoid of government, and instead relies on family to take care of her. I’m just not sure that there’s enough prosperity out there for every family to take care of their relatives who are unemployable, let alone those with disabilities like autism that require lots of professional help, and the elderly who can no longer care for themselves.
But I suspect that there are plenty of families who could do more, but rely on Medicaid or state programs instead.
I’m just not sure that there’s enough prosperity out there for every family to take care of their relatives who are unemployable
Good point, but I’d argue that families would be more capable of doing so if they weren’t taxed at such a high rate.
As things stand right now, the money used to take care of these folks is funneled through a huge, inefficient bureaucracy. That leaves LESS for the people who need help.
Let me take care of my unemployed brother and disabled mother. I’ll gladly do it. As it stands right now, that’s more difficult as a large % of my prosperity is being taken from me by force.
It’s hard to innovate and work hard when the job was offshored.
Let me spell it out for you: There. Are. Not. Enough. Jobs.
And outside of entry level jobs, nobody is willing to train these days. A very bad trend that started back in the 1980s which we, as nation of complete morons, think is normal.
Haven’t you people ever seen those documentaries on the Great Depressions ? Thousands of people where living in tent communities .
There wasn’t jobs ,no matter how hard you tried . Why do you think
they had soup lines . It was a horrible situation and families didn’t have
the resources to help each other often times during those times .
It is trivial for one person to support one person. And one person may be willing to live in a tent down by the river, but the equation changes when you take responsibility for a family. What I am willing to endure, I may not be willing to force small children to endure.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard says she shares the ‘‘uncomfortable feeling’’ Australians have about huge CEO salaries.
A new study shows the average CEO will this year take home $6.4 million in total remuneration.
The Australian Financial Review survey shows executive pay rose by an average of more than $940,000 or 17.2 per cent over the past year. By comparison, the annual wage of a full-time worker rose by $3200, or 5.2 per cent.
And an ACTU study on remuneration shows a typical CEO is taking home almost 100 times what the average worker gets paid.
Does anyone know a 1%er? Sobering op-ed about our Banana Republic. “…the wealthiest plutocrats now actually control a greater share of the pie in the United States than in historically unstable countries like Nicaragua, Venezuela and Guyana.”
Suicide? I would guess that car had keys in the ignition, and an empty gas tank. People just don’t up and die in their cars, locked in the garage, all that often.
Oh, and here is a question for the legal eagles here: does the car count as equipment and/or fixtures to the house, and conveyed along under the foreclosure deed? Or does this happy homeowner have to open an estate for the deceased in order to convey it and pay off any heirs?
I think I would you advise him to push the car out to the curb and let the municipality take care of it. It is not his property, so he probably can not be fined for abandoning it.
China to Raise Reserve Ratio by 50 Basis Points From Nov. 29
China ordered banks to set aside larger reserves for the fifth time this year, draining cash from the financial system to limit inflation and asset-bubble risks in the world’s fastest-growing major economy.
Man, they should have seen that coming a mile away.
First off, the Japanese didn’t pioneer high speed rail (per the article) - the USA did. After WW II Japanese engineers traveled here to study our high speed interurbans. Back then one of the fastest was the Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee - which ran its famed Electroliners built in 1940-1.
In 1963 the US abandoned the North Shore Line.
In 1964 Japan kicked off its Shinkansen.
The rest is history, sadly a history that includes a couple of oil wars. And by the way, up until very recently the Chinese were seriously building steam locomotives - locomotives based partly off of Soviet and American designs.
So shame on Siemens, Kawasaki, and Bombardier,et. al.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2010-11-19 08:34:19
So shame on Siemens, Kawasaki, and Bombardier,et. al.
Shame on a national policy (er, fetish) that prioritized the automobile over viable forms of mass transit, long-term consequences be damned.
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-19 08:50:12
What does surprise me is that the Japanese didn’t forsee the Chinese ripping of their designs.
OMG…this whole China trade debacle is so ironic. When I was a kid the hoary ol’ Open Door crowd was just SO sure that if we’d get China to trade with us, it would be us selling to them. I don;t cry racism much, but really they just never suspected our Little Yellow Brothers could ever catch up with and exceed us. LOL
By Christine Willmsen
Seattle Times staff reporter
Emiel Kandi forever changed the lives of a pregnant hairdresser, a jobless mechanic and a single mom when he loaned them money.
“I am a wolf,” he explained.
Jefferson Marsh, a 56-year-old car mechanic, owned his Puyallup home free and clear for a decade. After he lost his job several years ago, he struggled to pay the bills
By October 2007, he was desperate. He owed $13,400 in property taxes and was about to lose his home in a sheriff’s sale if he didn’t act fast.
He turned to the bank where he had a checking account. he was turned down.
Marsh contacted Kandi
Following Kandi’s instructions, Marsh signed a promissory note for $170,000, even though he was getting only $17,000.
Marsh knew he was paying about $7,000 in fees and interest for the loan. But he had no idea he had signed his house away. Nor did the documents state the true interest rate of the loan, later determined to be 45 percent.
Kandi required Marsh to repay him in person, cash only. Marsh said that after he made the first four payments, Kandi wouldn’t meet with him to accept an April 2008 payment of $1,000.
Kandi denied that, saying Marsh didn’t have the money.
Then he flipped the property, selling it for $235,000 to a former banker who had borrowed money from Kandi in the past. The new owner had most of Marsh’s belongings tossed into the yard. Marsh’s great-grandmother’s hurricane lamp, his grandfather’s banjo and his dad’s ukulele were gone, he said.
And the Kandis walked away with more than $200,000.
I am not surprised a scumbag like Kandi would try to pull something like this off. I am shocked and appalled that the State of Washington does not have the statutes and regs making this clearly illegal and easily prosecuted.
Hey, Kandi,…enjoy your 15 min’s of “Ain’t-I-beetchin!” …as your loans get secularized & you get scrutinized.
Kandi, 34 / Kandi, a former mortgage originator / Kandi skirts mortgage requirements and disclosures by writing up his loans as “commercial.” / Kandi has been able to make hundreds of thousands of dollars.
“He finds vulnerable people and exploits them.”
“State authorities do not regulate commercial loans and the hard-money industry. There are no registrations, licenses or education requirements for the lenders.”
“Kandi is the lender of last resort for some people who’ve been turned down by banks because of poor credit or limited income. He says his requirement for a borrower is merely “a pulse and a legal ability to sign.”
Which, IMHO, is why the Chick-fil-a hit is proving to be such a tough case here in Tucson.
The hit-ee was a mortgage guy who’d been involved in a rent-to-own scam that got busted. He was popped in a Chick-fil-a restaurant, and there were plenty of witnesses.
What’s worse, the hitman escaped on a bicycle. And you know how slow those things are.
Any-hoo, he hasn’t been caught yet.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-11-19 13:25:34
The hit-ee was a mortgage guy who’d been involved in a rent-to-own scam that got busted. He was popped…
Do you all think this type of possibility keeps people more “honest” in their dealings than the law and morals do alone?
By Jonathan Weil - Nov 17, 2010 9:00 PM ET Bloomberg Opinion
Consider the recent events at Wilmington Trust Corp. The Delaware bank on Nov. 1 said it would sell itself to M&T Bank Corp. for $351 million, which was 46 percent less than its stock-market value at the time. In August, Wilmington had said the fair value of its loans was only $40 million less than their $8 billion balance-sheet value as of June 30.
That term, fair value, was supposed to have been given a uniform definition under a FASB standard issued in 2006 called Statement 157. For financial assets, including loans, the FASB defined it as the sale price that would be received in an orderly, arm’s length transaction. This is known as an “exit price.”
Make-Believe Numbers
Wilmington didn’t use that definition for its loan disclosure. The loophole instead let Wilmington show an “entry price” estimate of how much it would cost to originate similar loans, rather than what its loans would be worth in a sale. That proved to be more like mark-to-make-believe than mark-to-market. Wilmington’s investors got blindsided as a result.
Wilmington disclosed its sale plans the same day it said its third-quarter loss widened to $365.3 million from $5.9 million a year earlier. It also said M&T had identified $506 million of additional credit losses. It’s unfathomable to think that none of those losses started happening until last quarter. An exit-price approach should have provided an early warning. A Wilmington spokesman, Bill Benintende, declined to comment.
The root of the problem. Until the numbers can actually mean something, we have no idea whatsoever where we are in determining what to do next. Extend and pretend is sabotaging any chance of recovery. But the bonuses are great.
Hacker arrested after cracking Federal Reserve
November 19, 2010
A federal grand jury has indicted a Malaysian citizen for allegedly hacking into a computer network at the Federal Reserve Bank and stealing more than 400,000 credit and debit card numbers. Federal prosecutors also allege Lin Mun Poo, 32, made a career of compromising systems at financial institutions, major corporations and defense contractors.
They say he sold or traded the information he found. Also according to the Justice Department, “in approximately August 2010, he hacked into the computer system of a Department of Defense contractor that provides systems management for military transport and other military operations, potentially compromising highly sensitive military logistics information.” Poo was arrested when he traveled to the U.S. in October. If convicted of the most serious charges, he faces up to 10 years in prison.
A thirty-two-year-old Malaysian hacks into our computer systems from somehwere on the other side of the planet and causes all sort of hell here in the U.S.
Somebody here is really dumb, and it isn’t this thirty-two-year-old Malaysian.
If you have a 256 bit key thats 2^256 different combinations.
Acording to my Windows calculator thats 1.1579208923731619542357098500869e+77 different combinations.
Now if its protected by an ordinary password, that’s another story.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-19 08:55:39
well…Serious encryption is rarely broken by merely guessing keys. The allies never would have broken the Enigma if it hadn’t been for poor procedures on the part of the operators. And for public key encryption the number of possible keys for a 256 bit key ISN’T 2^256. rather it’s related to the set of primes (or is it semi-primes, I don’t remember) less than ~1.1579e+77. Still a huge, ginormous number.
Comment by In Colorado
2010-11-19 10:33:36
I think you’re talking about permutations vs. combinations, but I won’t quibble.
And I agree, when codes are broken, its due to a lucky strike (like when the Allies captured an Enigma machine).
Comment by Jim A.
2010-11-19 13:01:13
But even with a working enigma machine, the allies wouldn’t have been able to crack the enigma except for the poor operating procedure of the operators. An early example is as follows: Now even though the rotors and their order within the machine were set centrally, the starting position (letter showing) of the rotors had to be different for each message or the allies could use simple letter frequency analyis to solve ACROSS all the messages sent that day. So there was a standard starting position for the rotors, but that was used only to send the (supposedly random) starting position for that particular message. So far, quite good. But to prevent there from being any mixups and to ensure that the correct message starting positions were received, they were sent twice, without resetting. So the allies knew that the 1st and 4th, the 2nd and 5th as well as the 3rd and 6th letters of a message encrypted the same plaintext. Which could be used to eliminate the majority of possible message settings.
Comment by polly
2010-11-19 14:47:46
Jim,
Thank you. It is a good day when you learn something new.
Someone inside the federal reserve was probably compromised with a social engineering scam. The human element provides the weak link in secure systems.
Dollar to Become World’s `Weakest Currency,’ Drop to 75 Yen JPMorgan Says
By Shigeki Nozawa - Nov 17, 2010 10:25 PM ET
The dollar may fall below 75 yen next year as it becomes the world’s “weakest currency” due to the Federal Reserve’s monetary-easing program, according to JPMorgan & Chase Co
“The U.S. has the world’s largest current-account deficit but keeps interest rates at virtually zero,” Sasaki said at a forum in Tokyo yesterday. “The dollar can’t avoid the status as the weakest currency.”
The great American consumer…because people are smart!
Black Friday deals: St. Pete family is first in nation to start camping at Best Buy.
St. Petersburg, Florida — Forget just being first in line. These folks are the first in the nation to start camping out at a Best Buy store in search of Black Friday deals.
The Davenport family pitched a pair of tents Wednesday at 10 a.m. in front of the Best Buy at Tyrone Square in St. Pete to snag deals that were still nine days away.
That made them the first people to start camping out at a Best Buy store anywhere in the country. To put that in perspective: there are more than 1,000 Best Buy stores in the United States.
So the manager of the Tyrone Square Best Buy will join the Davenports on Friday, November 19 — a week before the big deal day — to present them with an award.
They’ll be recognized as the “First Family of Black Friday” and get a special gift.
How do they do it? They have ten family members taking turns.
Why do they do it?
“We’re here really early this year because we’ve always been second, third and fourth and down the line,” Lorie Davenport said.
“We’re tired of not being first and we figured we’ve put in six years, we want to be first.”
From a recent interview of ol’ Noam by Der Spiegel:
“Consumption distracts people. You cannot control your own population by force, but it can be distracted by consumption. The business press has been quite explicit about this goal.”
What? The recession is long passed and The Bernake has it all under control…Or so we’ve been told.
~ Few Businesses Sprout, With Even Fewer Jobs. ~ WSJ
Fewer new businesses are getting off the ground in the U.S., available data suggest, a development that could cloud the prospects for job growth and innovation.
In the early months of the economic recovery, start-ups of job-creating companies have failed to keep pace with closings, and even those concerns that do get launched are hiring less than in the past. The number of companies with at least one employee fell by 100,000, or 2%, in the year that ended March 31, the Labor Department reported Thursday.
That was the second worst performance in 18 years, the worst being the 3.4% drop in the previous year.
Newly opened companies created a seasonally adjusted total of 2.6 million jobs in the three quarters ended in March, 15% less than in the first three quarters of the last recovery, when investors and entrepreneurs were still digging their way out of the Internet bust.
Bernanke came accross as really gay in his latest speech. I think he is losing control of his sexuality as well as every thing else he falsely assumed he had control over.
For many years, I was represented in Congress by Jim Kolbe.
He was outed in 1996, and shortly after he was, I met him at a Tucson business networking event. He was campaigning for re-election.
I was mystified as to how Jim Kolbe could have stayed closeted for as long as he did. I mean, the guy had a way about him that would trip off the gay-dars from miles around.
Any-hoo, he was re-elected that year. And he continued winning elections until he decided to retire in ‘06.
QE2 indirectly buying commercial RE? $31m for a bad strip-mall.
A local story just popped up that makes no sense whatsoever. The aging strip-mall featured in the article has absolutely nothing going for it. An outdated movie theater-complex, a serial failure restaurant location, and a crappy old-school Home Depot. Something really fishy is going on here:
He’s right. Some may, but of them are built and owned by the corp. on corp. land. Think about it. Ever see a Home depot actually connected to another building?
Harrah’s Shelves $531 Million IPO on Market Conditions
Harrah’s Entertainment Inc., the world’s biggest casino company, said that it terminated its $531 million initial public offering due to market conditions.
The casino company taken private by Apollo Global Management LLC and TPG Capital was scheduled to sell 31.3 million shares for $15 to $17 yesterday, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and data compiled by Bloomberg. Las Vegas-based Harrah’s planned to change its name to Caesars Entertainment Corp. before the initial offering.
Here’s a report from Central Texas. We’ve just made another offer, this one on a lovingly maintained late 1970s 2100 sq. ft. 4BR/2.5BA in a location that would allow my husband to walk to work and allow us to remain a one-car family. The only objectionable thing about it is that the kitchen is basically original. They want $220k. We have offered $165k and told the sellers that our offer is good for two weeks. We’ve got two kids in private school, so we really can’t budge too far up on our offer. I’m going to hate it if this one gets away. On the bright side 1) they are closing on another house in three weeks and 2) we still have a good year and a half left before we have to leave our rental.
Good luck, Amy! Sounds like you are in the drivers seat on this one. I hope it works out for you.
As for us, well, DD is so happy in her new school, and we want to keep her there, so our househunting area has been contracted considerably. Its okay, though, because lots and teardowns have come down to where we can build new for close to the same as wishing price of existing homes.
I just saw one active listing reprice itself 8% lower in one shot - a far cry from the days of a seller offering a <1% reduction and thinking they were doing the world a favor.
“if you talk to listing agents, showings on most listings are very slow and a lot of homes are getting pulled from the market. In the first chart, note that in Oct, 60% of all listings that departed the Austin MLS were failed sales efforts. ”
It wouldn’t surprise me if the seller decides not to sale and holds on to the house and rents it…
I am currently paying $1450 for a 870 sq ft apartment in the heart of downtown Austin… When I moved in two years ago, parking was free…. My lease will be up in 80 days… I got a letter from management indicating my new parking bill will be $80 and my rent will go up to $1630. My total bill will be $1,710 or an increment of ~18%.
Apparently, higher end 1-bedroom units are in high demand…. I spent the last couple of days looking at other units within the area, and every single complex has raised the prices and decoupled rent from parking… I could not find any other complex nearby that could match the price, size or location… The only way for me to keep a similar rate would be to compromise location OR to take one of the 500 or 600 sq ft studios
I also took a look at resale condos in nearby buildings. However, buying doesn’t make a whole of sense with the high property taxes in Texas (2.5%) and the high HOA costs. For example, there are two comparable units in the 360 condos, which are 2 blocks away from where I currently live:
-Unit for rent is 748 sq ft on the 18th floor facing west. Going rate is $1650.
-Unit for sale is the same floor plan, but on the 19th floor also facing west. Sales price is $279,900. Annual Taxes $6,078. Monthly HOA fees of $277. If I were to put 20% to avoid mortgage insurance and I got a 4.75% interest on my loan, the monthly payment would be $2,126.
Renting for $1650 or buying for $2,126 a month…. why would anyone do that?
Financially, I am doing great…. single engineer, no student loands, no credit card debt, no car payments… who are these people renting/buying high end apartments/condos in downtown Austin?
Apparently there are many. Over the past 24 months, there have been 8 new apartment buildings in the downtown area: super high end Ashton with rents starting at 2100. In addition, they opened Legacy on the Lake, Cole, Gables Pressler, Gables Park Plaza, Gables 5th Street Commons and Red Rivwr flats. All those start around $1500 for 600 sq units. There are even 500 sq ft studios being leased for $1,300.
In addition, you have rentals in all the new condos and multiple other apartment complexes that are less than 5 years old (Monarch, AMLI downtown, AMLI on 2nd, some other Gables, 400 N Lamar). You will not find anything under 1400 but they are tinny units. AMLI om 2nd has a 626 sq ft unit going for 1700.
Maybe the producers of “Mega Movers” could arrange to relocate some massive condoze from Las Vegas and Miami to Austin? They could borrow the big tracked-thingie from NASA that they used to bring the space shuttle to the pad - they don’t need it anymore…
That is true, but Dell and many of those business are FAR from downtown. There’s no way anyone would wanna sit through an hour of traffic when there are beautiful suburban communities much closer to your work.
Renting for $1650 or buying for $2,126 a month…. why would anyone do that?
#1…You would do it so you don’t continue to get the increased rent notices like you just received…
#2… Assuming tax laws did not change (which is a big assumption) your effective payment (plus principal reduction) would be well below what you are paying in rent…
Not suggesting that it would make sense for you, But it could make sense for someone given the close relationship of the two payments…
I might add that I was quite stunned that downtown Austin rents are that expensive…It appears that it is comparable to the other major metro’s in the country…
Actually, nowdays that condo in Austin that Brett cites can be beaten quite easily up here in Chicago.
Last week I read about a short sale of a condo of similar size to Brett’s 748 sf unit mentioned- and one that included parking and was on a higher floor - all for $100k! Plus, the taxes were half what he quotes for that Austin condo (but the HOA was double).
Things are really screwy right now in condoland (US urban markets), best to wait until this shakes out.
I would rather rent in San Diego, where I go for quality not quantity (laid).
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Brett
2010-11-19 16:05:51
I saw a recent list where Austin was ranked as the best city for singles and with one of fittest communities. There’s a ton of good looking people everywhere.
Dude, mine is at the low end of prices for downtown apartments… You can easily pay 2k+ for 1br/1ba units if you go to nicer/larger units.
There’s a really nice 900sq ft unit across the street where I live. The rent is 2200 a month. The finishes and ammenities are nicer; the unit is new, but that’s a low of $$$ for Texas
Property taxes are 2.5% in Austin. That’s not going down any time soon; they might actually go up to close budget gaps. HOAs can only go up.
I am not sure how you can deduct my effective monthly payment would be lower.
how you can deduct my effective monthly payment would be lower ??
Well, it depends on your tax bracket but since you can afford this type of rent I am assuming you do pretty well income wise…
Your interest is deductible…Your HOA is deductible…Your taxes are deductible…Your earlier statement said “Renting for $1650 or buying for $2,126 a month”…If you can claim a 30% deduction on that payment your effective payment would be $1488. AT…
“5. Homeowners association fees
Forget homeowners association fees for maintaining common areas. Any fees specifically identified as your portion of taxes and/or interest would be allowable.
If you get a bill without a breakdown, none of the fees is deductible.”
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2010-11-19 10:19:53
If you get a bill without a breakdown, none of the fees is deductible.” ??
You get a breakdown annually from the HOA..Its mandatory…Sometimes semi-annual depending on the size of the complex…Even quarterly for really big ones…
Fed chief Ben Bernanke argued in a speech in Germany today that the Fed’s Treasury bond purchases are needed to promote faster job creation and reduce the risk that very low inflation could turn into deflation.
Even so, the Fed’s program by itself can’t fix all the economy’s problems, Bernanke said.
“There are limits to what can be achieved by the central bank alone,” he said, tamping down expectations.
~~Fed Can’t Do It Alone~~
< This should cause a shudder among Americans. Bernanke says the Federal Reserve System needs help to get the economy rolling again. Whence cometh the help? From the U.S. Congress. Think “another stimulus package.”
Crazy, to be sure, but that’s the track the experts are following. Dr. John Maynard Keynes, a dead but very influential economist, is still running the game. Unemployment high? Print money. Debt load making the economy sluggish? Take on more debt. These policies are leading to a tragic ruin of the U.S. dollar.
Greece needs to go through a period of deflation to return to competitiveness and ensure sustainable growth, John Sfakianakis, group chief economist at Banque Saudi Fransi, told CNBC Friday.
Greece’s lack of competitiveness is a major issue that is not being addressed and it, coupled with the burgeoning debt, could stall the country’s return to growth considerably, Sfakianakis said.
“Right now in Athens coffee is going for 4 euros, so you cannot have a competitive economy when you are charging everybody an arm and a leg. Deflationary economics have to set in, in order for Greece to become competitive,” he said.
Default
Leave the Euro
Print your own money (hmmm - wonder what to call it).
Become the cheap place to visit and to hire labor you once were
Add a few zeros to your currency every few years to keep insane public union pensions under control
I imagine the ratio in D.C. must be around 1 out every 2.
Nearly 1 in 5 Americans had mental illness in 2009
CHICAGO - More than 45 million Americans, or 20 percent of U.S. adults, had some form of mental illness last year, and 11 million had a serious illness, U.S. government researchers reported on Thursday.
Young adults aged 18 to 25 had the highest level of mental illness at 30 percent, while those aged 50 and older had the lowest, with 13.7 percent, said the report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration or SAMHSA.
The rate, slightly higher than last year’s 19.5 percent figure, reflected increasing depression, especially among the unemployed, SAMHSA, part of the National Institutes of Health, said.
“Too many Americans are not getting the help they need and opportunities to prevent and intervene early are being missed,” Pamela Hyde, SAMHSA’s administrator, said in a statement.
Web Censorship Bill Sails Through Senate Committee
Who says Congress never gets anything done?
On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved a bill that would give the Attorney General the right to shut down websites with a court order if copyright infringement is deemed “central to the activity” of the site — regardless if the website has actually committed a crime. The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) is among the most draconian laws ever considered to combat digital piracy, and contains what some have called the “nuclear option,” which would essentially allow the Attorney General to turn suspected websites “off.”
Washington (CNN) — The United States is beefing up its firepower in Afghanistan by employing heavily armored tanks in Afghanistan for the first time in the nine-year war, a military spokesman said Friday.
The U.S. Marine Corps plans to use a company of M1A1 Abrams tanks in restive Helmand province by early spring, said Marine Maj. Gabrielle Chapin.
The M1A1 tank is the fastest and most deadly ground combat weapons system available. It will allow for more aggressive missions while mitigating risks to U.S. forces, the military said.
U.S. forces used the tanks to battle insurgents successfully in Iraq’s Anbar province, Chapin said.
Economic Stimulus: The company that makes the tanks must need to sell more right now. I bet somebody’s uncle’s brother-in-law put the deal together. The military picks up quite a bit of slack as evidenced by Dick Cheney’s demonstration.
IIRC the Russians used tanks in Afghanistan in their 1980’s decade long war. One problem; the main gun could only elevate a few degrees. The insurgents simply climbed higher up the mountain than the main gun could elevate. From there they launched anti tank weapons. It took the Russians a long time to modify their tanks.
“Everyone knows that the entire apparatus of the [airport] security line is a national homage to political correctness. Nowhere do more people meekly acquiesce to more useless inconvenience and needless indignity for less purpose.” ~Charles Krauthammer
So says he in November 2010, but in November 2001? Commentators like him are part of the reason we have this issue now. From patriotic duty to meek acquiescence all within a decade.
No, actually Krauthammer, who is a neocon, has always been against the type of airport screening that we do in the US. He’s probably more of a fan of Israel’s screening. They are less tech-oriented, and do more interviewing, profiling.
Kids…ya know I love ‘em! (for context: the deadline to declare candidacy for mayor of Chicago is this Monday)
(From today’s Chi Tribune)
Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart said today he will resume foreclosure evictions as early as next week despite continuing questions over the legality of bank paperwork.
He said he wanted bank attorneys to sign a sworn affidavit saying they had verified the foreclosure was valid before he would carry out an eviction for them. But none would, he added.
Now, he said, the Cook County state’s attorney’s office has told the sheriff’s office it must attempt to enforce all foreclosure eviction orders that are signed by a judge, even if a review by sheriff’s staff finds some irregularities in the file. The state’s attorney advised that once a judge signs an eviction order, it is is presumed to be valid, he said.
The bond vigilantes may have woken up first in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal. “But France,” Roubini says, “does not look much better than the periphery.”
In Roubini’s view, the probability of the right steps being taken in France soon is not great. “Politically they are constrained from making reforms.” For example, after the French made relatively small changes in their social welfare system-raising the retirement age from 60 to 62 -”You had massive riots in the streets.”
And that, in Roubini’s view, was just the beginning of the necessary austerity.
“What’s going to happen when you do more radical reform? That’s an open question in the case of France.”
Looking beyond France to the future trajectory of the crisis, Roubini says, “The next one in line is going to be Portugal. “Due to the severity of Portuguese debt problems, Portugal is going to lose market access-and that means they are going to require IMF support as well.
But the real nightmare domino is Spain. Roubini refers to the Spanish debt problems as “the elephant in the room”.
“You can try to ring fence Spain. And you can essentially try to provide financing officially to Ireland, Portugal, and Greece for three years. Leave them out of the market. Maybe restructure their debt down the line.”
“But if Spain falls off the cliff, there is not enough official money in this envelope of European resources to bail out Spain. Spain is too big to fail on one side-and also too big to be bailed out.”
I just think the average person would be much more willing to take a hit in retirement etc if the banking elite who caused this mess took their medicine too.
Meredith Whitney Plans to Launch Rival Rating Agency
Meredith Whitney, a Wall Street analyst who shot to prominence with bearish calls on banks before the financial crisis, plans to set up a credit-rating agency to go head to head with Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s.
Meredith Whitney
Ms Whitney said in an interview with the Financial Times that her new agency would use the same business model as established agencies, in which issuers of debt pay for ratings. She maintained that she would be able to manage potential conflicts of interest, saying: “If you run a good business and you have compliance in place, there should not be problems.”
Indeed, the huge amounts of debt financing and refinancing activity that has been going on this year in the capital markets, particularly in the US bond markets where interest rates are at record lows, have boosted revenues for the biggest rating agencies. Bond sales by companies with “junk” or “high yield” ratings, for example, are higher this year than they have ever been before.
“If you run a good business and you have compliance in place, there should not be problems.”
I wish her the best. What is really needed is lots more competing raters. Eventually those whose ratings pan out would survive, and those whose ratings prove to be rubbish would go out of business.
By the way, my suggestion is based on the principles of free-market capitalism. With very few ratings agencies, the risks of group think stupidity or collusive coordination of ratings to satisfy client preferences is very high.
Sadly, I bet Meredith runs into a stone wall similar to the one Tucker encountered with the Big Three. The criminal syndicate called Wall Street won’t let outsiders into their club.
At NATO summit, Obama’s ride is talk of the town
Whoops, President Obama must have missed the memo on this one.
While the Portuguese prime minister and the Portuguese president of the European Union’s executive commission are tooling around the NATO summit here in no-emission electric vehicles, Mr. Obama is fouling the Lisbon skies with his no-efficiency “Beast,” the eight-ton, diesel-fueled behemoth of a limousine the president carts around the world with him.
Oh, and to drive the point home, journalists attending the summit are being ferried to events in electric buses, as well.
A “note to the media” left at every journalist’s work station in the summit press center says the use of electric vehicles is meant to raise awareness of Portugal’s “world pioneering leadership in electric mobility.” Portugal claims to derive 45 percent of its electricity consumption from “clean” energies. Its “Mobi.E” electric mobility network – with 100 charging stations in 25 municipalities around the country, set to rise to 1,300 charging points by mid-2011 – is considered a world leader.
But the Portuguese press is more interested in the Beast. Pages in Lisbon newspapers have been dedicated to cutaway renderings of “Cadillac One,” with charts and boxes offering every detail of the vehicle that the Secret Service divulges: the Kevlar tires, the special foam in the gas tank to immediately extinguish any fire from a direct hit, the supply of presidential blood.
Another point of fascination is the unparalleled security detail to accompany Obama as he moves from bilateral meetings with Portuguese leaders to the summit venue to the Lisbon Marriott Hotel, where he may or may not sleep. (Another overnight option, to keep everyone guessing, is the residence of the US ambassador to Portugal).
While Obama’s motorcade is accompanied by the 35 Portuguese police motorcycles, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev – who arrives for a three-hour visit Saturday to participate in a NATO-Russia Council meeting – will get no such treatment.
On the bright side for Mr. Medvedev, he – unlike Obama – will be able to claim that his modest transport is more in line with the NATO meeting’s green theme.
ISTR some sort of event where Obama was asked about greening The Beast. His reply was that he’d asked about running the car on clean energy, but the Secret Service nixed the idea.
Sorry to say, but if you want to power a heavy vehicle like the Beast — and give it some pickup — gasoline is still the best fuel choice.
When they make an electric armored vehicle that is also impervious to EMP, I’m sure the President will get one… right after everyone stops complaining about the cost.
Wesley Snipes to Be Ordered to Prison for Tax Evasion (AP)
A federal judge granted a government motion that actor Wesley Snipes be ordered to prison.
Snipes had been convicted on tax evasion charges in 2008.
His attorneys had requested a new trial, but that motion was denied on Friday by U.S. District Court Judge William Terrell Hodges.
Earlier this month, federal attorneys had asked a central Florida judge to revoke Wesley Snipes’ bond if the actor was granted a new trial, but it looks like that point is now moot.
Snipes’ attorneys argued he deserved a new trial because of jury bias in his 2008 conviction. They said two jurors were accusing other jurors of deciding the case without hearing evidence.
They also said prosecutors hid damaging information about a key witness.
Federal prosecutors argued interviewing those jurors about their deliberations would violate juror rules, and intimidate future juries.
The star of the “Blade” trilogy faces a three-year prison sentence.
So James Carville has been saying Hillary should some of her testicular fortitude w/Obama so then they’d both have some. The comment was in reference to how he’s handled the banks. He he he! That’s just beautiful.
This guy is truly amazing. I hope to meet him some day. He has the most honest, simple, forthright explanation of how Megabank, Inc systemically steals from middle-class American families that I have heard to date.
Proposals to fix the deficit are coming fast and furious in Washington these days. One major target: Social Security.
Whether you favor cutting Social Security may depend on how you view the Social Security trust funds, which currently contain $2.5 trillion for retirement benefits. That’s $2.5 trillion that, according to some people, don’t actually exist.
Here’s the back story.
If you look at your paycheck, in the spot where it lists deductions, there’s a line that says “FICA.” That’s the money that gets taken out of your check to pay for Social Security.
For the past 25 years or so, the amount of money the government has raised through those taxes has been greater than what it’s been spending to fund Social Security.
The surplus came largely from the baby boomers — and we’re going to need that extra money when they retire and start collecting Social Security.
This is where the $2.5 trillion trust funds come in.
The government has invested all that money in Treasury bonds, which are traditionally considered among the safest investments in the world.
But a Treasury bond, remember, is the way the government borrows money. So the government is lending the Social Security surplus to itself. And the obligation to repay those loans is the trust funds’.
“They are nothing like any trust fund that any one of us would think of,” says Maya MacGuineas of the New America Foundation. “It conjures up an image of really holding savings, and it doesn’t do that at all.”
TOKYO (Dow Jones)–The U.S. dollar fell against the yen in Asia Friday from a fresh six-week high hit overnight in New York, after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke mounted a strong defense of the Fed’s easy-money policies.
In remarks prepared for delivery Friday in Frankfurt, Bernanke showed his resolve to continue with the Fed’s second round of quantitative easing.
“On its current economic trajectory the United States runs the risk of seeing millions of workers unemployed or underemployed for years,” Bernanke said. “As a society, we should find that outcome unacceptable.”
Bernanke’s remarks followed comments by other Fed officials who supported the easing steps to stimulate the U.S. economy. Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Narayana Kocherlakota, who was presumed to be uncomfortable with the Fed’s recent decision to buy $600 billion in longer-dated Treasurys, said late Thursday, “I did express support for the decision at the recent meeting (of the Federal Open Reserve Committee).”
Foreign exchange participants sold the dollar in reaction, pushing it lower.
“Although some recent U.S. economic indicators turned out to be stronger than expected, comments from Fed officials have given the reassurance that the Fed is going to implement the QE2 just as it announced,” said Satoshi Tate, senior vice president of the foreign exchange division of Mizuho Corporate Bank.
…
Oh my — just when it seemed like the financial crisis was finally dying down, it looks like Goldman Sachs may be in for another thirty lashes with a wet noodle. Oh, the humanity!
By SUSAN PULLIAM, MICHAEL ROTHFELD,JENNY STRASBURG and GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
Federal authorities, capping a three-year investigation, are preparing insider-trading charges that could ensnare consultants, investment bankers, hedge-fund and mutual-fund traders and analysts across the nation, according to people familiar with the matter.
The criminal and civil probes, which authorities say could eclipse the impact on the financial industry of any previous such investigation, are examining whether multiple insider-trading rings reaped illegal profits totaling tens of millions of dollars, the people say. Some charges could be brought before year-end, they say.
The investigations, if they bear fruit, have the potential to expose a culture of pervasive insider trading in U.S. financial markets, including new ways non-public information is passed to traders through experts tied to specific industries or companies, federal authorities say.
One focus of the criminal investigation is examining whether nonpublic information was passed along by independent analysts and consultants who work for companies that provide “expert network” services to hedge funds and mutual funds. These companies set up meetings and calls with current and former managers from hundreds of companies for traders seeking an investing edge.
Among the expert networks whose consultants are being examined, the people say, is Primary Global Research LLC, a Mountain View, Calif., firm that connects experts with investors seeking information in the technology, health-care and other industries. “I have no comment on that,” said Phani Kumar Saripella, Primary Global’s chief operating officer. Primary’s chief executive and chief operating officers previously worked at Intel Corp., according to its website.
In another aspect of the probes, prosecutors and regulators are examining whether Goldman Sachs Group Inc. bankers leaked information about transactions, including health-care mergers, in ways that benefited certain investors, the people say. Goldman declined to comment.
…
If there is a silver lining to the uproar over the Federal Reserve’s decision to create $600 billion in new reserves in the next few months, it is the renewed public attention to the Fed’s impossible dual political mandate for stable prices and maximum employment.
To be specific, Paul Ryan suddenly has company. The Wisconsin Congressman has since 1999 proposed legislation that would let the Fed focus monetary policy solely on the goal of stable prices. This week he’s been joined by fellow Republicans Mike Pence of Indiana and Tom Price of Georgia, while Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee told us he plans to work with Mr. Ryan to introduce legislation next year that would lift the dual mandate. If the 112th Congress did nothing else, this would be worth the price of its election and a major contribution to better economic policy.
These columns have decried the dual mandate since it became the law of the land in 1978 with the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act, aka Humphrey-Hawkins. To appreciate the problem, consider that in the original Federal Reserve Act of 1913 Congress asked the central bank to supervise banks. It did not mention explicit economic goals. Even in the Keynesian heyday of the Employment Act of 1946, Congress did not ask the Fed to manage the economy.
But with Humphrey-Hawkins, Congress ordered the central bank to “promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates.” The political context in that age of Jimmy Carter will sound familiar. U.S. unemployment was stubbornly high and the fiscal policies (tax rebates) of a Democratic Congress had failed to stimulate. So the politicians decided to conscript the Fed in its job creation mission by ordering the ostensibly independent central bank to target employment as well as prices.
The contradictions were as apparent then as now; as Mr. Corker puts it, a central bank cannot have “a bipolar mandate.” The pressure to bring down unemployment using money creation during difficult economic times will inevitably complicate the task of maintaining stable prices. As the Fed pushes money out the door, whether or not there is an economic demand for more dollars, there will be an illusion in the short-run that people are better off. But the longer-term effect may be inflationary as too much money chases too few goods.
…
Turns out that jobs today are more important to the world outside California than dire prospects for catastrophic consequences of global climate change that are supposed to happen at some indeterminate point a century or more into the future.
The Wall Street Journal
* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* NOVEMBER 20, 2010
Cap and Retreat The largest U.S. carbon market collapses.
A cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions has been touted by environmentalists as a market-friendly mechanism to reduce global warming. Well, the market has spoken. The Chicago Climate Exchange, which advertises itself as “North America’s only cap and trade system for greenhouse gasses,” is shutting down.
The CCX launched to great fanfare in 2003 with a grant of some $1.1 million from the Joyce Foundation. Time magazine called company founder Richard Sandor a “hero of the planet.” The exchange got off to a blazing start with hundreds of companies—from DuPont to Ford to Motorola—voluntarily agreeing to buy and sell rights to emit CO2 above a legally binding quota. At its peak in May 2008, CCX was trading 10 million tons of carbon permits per month. The price of carbon offsets rose from $1 a ton to a high of $7.40 in mid-2008.
The market collapsed in 2009 when the price fell to $1, and trading all but ceased this summer. The fate of the carbon trading market closely followed the prospects of passing a mandatory federal cap on carbon emissions in Congress. Once the Senate rejected the cap-and-tax scheme—because the tax would have cost millions of jobs—many corporations suddenly lost interest in paying for greenhouse gas emissions. A market that green groups had predicted would exceed $500 billion a year in trading is now flat-lined. The only place cap and trade is still alive and well is, alas, California.
If you decide to buy a foreclosure home, by all means don’t hesitate to ask questions about former occupants. Can banks be charged in the deaths of home owners who are facing eviction? What if it turns out someone dies because of an erroneous robo-signing eviction?
Body in 1 foreclosed Fla. home, death in another
By TAMARA LUSH The Associated Press
Friday, November 19, 2010; 3:42 PM
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — A man who bought a foreclosed Florida home discovered a body in the garage, and it may be that of the former owner, authorities said Friday.
The man went to the home in Cape Canaveral on Thursday, a day after buying it, Brevard County Sheriff’s Major Andrew Walters said. He found the body in a car in the garage.
Walters said it’s unclear how long the body had been there, or how the person died. An autopsy was underway.
News of the gruesome find came the same day as a 71-year-old man in Gulfport, across the state, died after shooting himself in the head Monday as he was about to be evicted from his home under foreclosure.
Boyd Rubright shot himself as a sheriff’s deputy tried to drill through the lock on his front door, police said.
The body in the Cape Canaveral house was believed to be that of a woman, Walters said. Investigators think it may the home’s previous owner, because she hasn’t been seen for a while. She went through foreclosure earlier this year.
Mortgage lender Wells Fargo & Co. sold the home Wednesday. Neighbors told authorities that the woman had “disappeared” some time ago.
In Gulfport, foreclosure proceedings against Rubright began two years ago, court records show.
Gulfport Police Sgt. Robert Burkhart said the eviction was scheduled for the weekend but was postponed for a few days, Burkhart said. On Monday, when a deputy went to the house to evict Rubright, the officer knocked and received no answer.
That’s when he began drilling the lock and heard a single shot.
Burkhart, who later responded to the scene, said Rubright was discovered in a recliner with a .357-caliber revolver in his hand.
Authorities spoke with Rubright’s family, who said the elderly man had lived in his home for 20-plus years.
“He had mentioned to them that they were not going to take his house from him,” Burkhart said. “They, I assume, meaning the bank.”
One of a million foreclosures this year.
Anthony Suau for TIME
Trevor Douglas, 54, may soon lose his Orlando house. Sure, Douglas hasn’t paid his mortgage in more than two years, which is what a Bank of America spokesperson tells me “is important to remember.” It is. Still, if it happens, I will feel partially responsible. I helped push Douglas closer to eviction.
Like many other home loans, Douglas’ IOU was bought and sold numerous times and finally packed into a bond. So when his foreclosure notice finally arrived, the entity trying to kick him out was one he had never heard of, something called GSAMP 2005-HE3. Worse, GSAMP said it had lost the original document — called a promissory note — to prove they owned his loan. Douglas hired a lawyer, who got the foreclosure put on hold. And that’s when I showed up. Much of the ire focused on the banks recently has been on their use of robo-signers — low-wage workers hired by banks to witness and sign hundreds of thousands of foreclosure notices without verifying that the grounds for the evictions were valid. On Thursday, a Federal Reserve official told lawmakers on a House Financial Service subcommittee that U.S. bank regulators are conducting a review of the banks’ foreclosure practices. In hundreds of thousand of cases, the promissory note that proves a bank owns a borrower mortgage is now gone. Vanished. Some borrowers may walk away scot free. In other instances, banks may be forced to dramatically reduce what a borrower owes. Many foreclosures have already been halted by the courts or by the banks themselves. Still, bank officials say, even if they are missing the original promissory note, they have the paperwork to prove they own the mortgages. (See pictures of Americans in their homes.)
Just how bad is the problem? TIME dug into the mortgage of one troubled borrower. What we found suggests that many promissory notes are not lost. In an effort to rush homeowners to foreclosure, and hide damaging information, bankers’ have needlessly created a huge legal mess that once again questions the financial industry’s credibility and ethics. “They [banks] don’t comply with the law when they’re taking people’s homes,” says Michael Olenick, who owns Legalprise, a legal research firm.
…
Angelo Mozilo
Photo Illustration; Mozillo: Mark Wilson / Getty; Getty
The son of a butcher, Mozilo co-founded Countrywide in 1969 and built it into the largest mortgage lender in the U.S. Countrywide wasn’t the first to offer exotic mortgages to borrowers with a questionable ability to repay them. In its all-out embrace of such sales, however, it did legitimize the notion that practically any adult could handle a big fat mortgage. In the wake of the housing bust, which toppled Countrywide and IndyMac Bank (another company Mozilo started), the executive’s lavish pay package was criticized by many, including Congress. Mozilo left Countrywide last summer after its rescue-sale to Bank of America. A few months later, BofA said it would spend up to $8.7 billion to settle predatory lending charges against Countrywide filed by 11 state attorneys general.
…
CHICAGO (AP) — An Illinois sheriff who halted foreclosure evictions last month because some bank employees weren’t following the proper procedures said Friday he’s been forced to order his deputies to carry them out, but he will continue investigating the matter and could charge banks and their employees with crimes.
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart said he is only ordering evictions to resume because county prosecutors told him that he was legally bound to carry out foreclosure eviction orders signed by a judge.
“For the people who have been involved with this and think now that because the (Cook County) State’s Attorney’s office has ordered me to go ahead with the evictions that everything’s fine . . . No, we are going to be looking at you for criminal violations,” Dart said. “You may have got through one storm now, the other one is coming.”
Dart singled out Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and GMAC/Ally Financial last month for problems with eviction notices. He said Friday that investigators continue to find problems with bank employees signing off on foreclosure documents they haven’t read, although he did not single out individual companies.
“When we asked a month ago . . . send me an affidavit to say that everything was done legally, not one organization, law firm handling these cases, not one of them sent in one document,” Dart said. “Not one, and they had over a month to do it.”
The sheriff said that if anything, his office’s investigation has shown the problems that prompted the moratorium were even more widespread than he first thought.
“We are being overwhelmed with abundant evidence that there are irregularities,” he said, adding that just a cursory investigation by his financial crimes unit has shown problems in eviction order after eviction order. “Irregularities are going on all over the place here. It’s the norm.”
…
I was talking to a friend of mine this morning who is a defense attorney, and we were discussing some of the facts of the mortgage cases our firm is handling. As I’ve mentioned in previous cases, many of these mortgage companies are representing that they will review the clients’ situation for a modification, or approving their modification, and at the same time, they proceed with foreclosure.
While we were talking, it struck me. What’s the rush? Why are these banks moving so quickly to foreclose? Why are they putting themselves in this position? It doesn’t make sense.
The current situation in the United States is unprecedented. These banks have never had so many loans in default. The banks, even though very large (Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, CitiMortgage, etc.), are not equipped to handle all of these modifications and foreclosures. So, why not slow down? Quit rushing the process. You don’t have to foreclose immediately. You don’t have to commit fraud and misrepresentations. You don’t have to throw people out on the street.
Why are they rushing? Well, I can only think of a couple reasons. First, many of the people handling the modifications and foreclosures are low level employees, and they do not think outside the box. They are given their structure and told what to do, and they are scared to deviate even if it means helping the customer.
Second, there might be some accounting, tax and/or regulatory reasons why the banks have to get these bad loans off their books. If this is the case, then maybe we need new legislation to address the problem. However, if they weren’t losing documents and making people file their packages on multiple occasions, they might not need to rush to foreclosure.
We have been successful in helping a couple people with these issues, but there are thousands suffering. Hopefully, in the future, better processes will be developed, and better decisions will be made. Until then, the court dockets will continue to increase with these types of cases.
Home sales have plunged since the home buyer tax credit breathed its last in April.
But now, thanks to the robo-signing scandal, along comes another artificial stimulus to prop up the housing market.
Hammered with questions over the validity of foreclosure paperwork, banks are pulling back big time, putting on hold both initial foreclosure petitions and foreclosure deeds, the last step in the process.
Foreclosure petitions fell 51 percent in October, while foreclosure deeds, representing completed home seizures, fell 39 percent, according to The Warren Group, publisher of Banker & Tradesman.
Now don’t get fooled here into thinking this is some great boost for the battered housing market. In fact, there are already some suggestions to that effect, unbelievably really. While this could prove a short-term boon for sellers - stick with me, I will get to that - it is likely to prove another unfortunate roller coaster ride for the housing market as a whole.
Just wait until the spring, when foreclosure petitions and takings soar after the major banks work out the paperwork kinks. After all, the foreclosure crisis was already on track to set new records here in Massachusetts and across the country before the robo-signing controversy erupted.
So we are looking at a temporary lift followed by another deep dip, similar to what happened this summer after the home buyer tax credit went away.
But for anyone faced with having to sell a home, yes, the next few months could prove to be a rare opportunity akin to what we saw last spring in the months leading up to the end of the credit.
…
Peter Ticktin, the South Florida attorney who has received national attention as a foreclosure defense expert, has something in common with his clients: He is fighting the bank to keep his house.
Deutsche Bank National began foreclosure proceedings on Ticktin’s Boca Raton home in 2007 after the lawyer and his wife fell behind on their loan. The couple haven’t made a mortgage payment since December 2006 and continue to live in the 3,920-square-foot house in Paradise Palms.
Ticktin has fought Deutsche Bank using the same strategy that he’s been able to use for his clients: uncovering sloppy paperwork and poorly prepared mortgage files. In the Ticktins’ case, Deutsche Bank didn’t have their mortgage note, a problem that has surfaced in tens of thousands of foreclosure defense cases nationwide.
Deutsche Bank dropped its foreclosure action in February after the Ticktins’ attorneys claimed they didn’t have enough information to respond because there was no note. The bank refiled the foreclosure last month, saying it has original affidavits showing it has the right to foreclose.
“It’s embarrassing that I’m in foreclosure. But I now understand my clients better than some lawyers who never had a problem in their lives,” said Ticktin, whose firm is handles 3,000 foreclosure defense cases at two Florida offices, one in Deerfield Beach and one in Tampa.
He said he’s confident he and his attorney, Jamie Sasson, can defend against the action. “[Deutsche Bank] doesn’t have the paperwork,” Ticktin said.
…
Foreclosures got attention on Capitol Hill this week, as the Senate Banking Committee heard testimony related to foreclosure paperwork problems plaguing lenders.
The “robo-signing” controversy that caused some lenders to halt foreclosures might be a bigger crisis than originally thought, said Christopher Dodd, the committee’s chairman.
The problems could further deepen the current foreclosure crisis, said Diane Thompson, a lawyer for the National Consumer Law Center, in her testimony to the committee.
“The lack of restraint on servicer abuses has created a moral hazard juggernaut that at best prolongs and deepens the current foreclosure crisis and at worst threatens our global economic security,” Thompson said, according to a news release. “Recent exposures of robo-signing and lack of ownership documentation by servicers have taken the wraps off a servicing system that has failed homeowners, investors and our society.”
Meanwhile, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Thursday that a greater percentage of mortgages entered the foreclosure process in the third quarter.
…
We’ve got an interesting discussion this week with financial analyst Reggie Middleton of the BoomBust Blog.
Earlier this week, the S&P Case-Shiller Index of home prices was released, reflecting a 0.3% drop in home prices in August 2010 from the previous month. Doesn’t sound too bad, right? But wait — Reggie tells us that in averaging the current price of houses in certain US markets, the Case-Shiller boys left out a few little, um, important details…
Reggie also talks about his background in real estate investing, and the warning signs that led him to exit the New York real estate market.
I was under the impression that debt from the housing (FHA), the big three (GMAC, CC, FC), student loans (SM), consumer credit cards (AE, MC, Visa, etc.) as well as commercial paper losses have all been purchased (at par?) by the federal reserve bank, which they add to their balance sheet. The entire process is called QE. FWIW, I never once heard the term QE during my education.
I’m too busy supporting a family to pay attention to the details, but that’s my simplistic assumption, PB.
Reggie says that Case-Shiller/S&P 500 excludes foreclosures from their data. This obviously skews the index to the high side, as the percentage of recent home sales transactions which are foreclosures approaches 50 percent of the market in some areas.
If this guy knows what he is talking about, the Case-Shiller index is nothing but an upwardly-biased statistical lie.
The rate of home sales has plummeted in The OC. Further significant price declines are in the bag, especially once the robo-signer paperwork issues are cleared up and foreclosure sales kick back up into overdrive.
The housing market continued to struggle against fierce headwinds last month, losing ground in the face of tightfisted lenders and edgy buyers.
The median price of an Orange County home – or price at the midpoint of all sales – fell to $438,000 last month, housing tracker MDA DataQuick reported Tuesday.
That’s the lowest since April and up just 0.3 of a percentage point (or $1,500) from the October 2009 median.
Find out how the rest of Southern California’s housing markets did on Lansner on Real Estate.
Meanwhile, sagging sales stretched into their fourth month, with 2,298 Orange County homes trading hands in October.
That’s 9 percent fewer than in September and 17.9 percent below the October 2009 tally.
While sales typically drop from September to October, last month was the second-slowest for an October since DataQuick began tracking home sales in 1988. It also was nearly 36 percent below the average of around 3,600 housing deals in a typical October.
The market appeared to be on fire during the first half of the year. But industry insiders now fret that state and federal tax breaks failed to ignite a stronger, longer-lasting recovery after ending in the second half.
“A lot of us were disappointed that the wind that would be in our sails just faded,” observed Jeff Culbertson, executive vice president for Coldwell Banker’s Southwestern U.S. region, which includes Orange County.
“We’re not in a bad market,” Culbertson added. “But we’re not in a good market.”
…
Just when it looked like U.S. banks were starting to reveal the true values of their loans, it turns out there’s an accounting loophole they can exploit to keep bad news buried.
Ever since new rules took effect last year, lenders have been required to disclose the “fair value” of their loans each quarter. The results have been something of a mystery, though. Some banks show large disparities between these numbers and the loan values on their balance sheets. Others don’t.
One big reason: Thanks to the loophole, they don’t all have to follow the same definition of fair value. My guess is most investors don’t know this. Often lenders’ disclosures don’t clearly explain which approach they’re using, or that companies have a choice. Unsuspecting readers of their financial statements easily could be misled.
…
Total housing sales in 2010 will be down about 8 percent from last year, and will mark the bottom of the downturn, says a monthly report from Fannie Mae economists.
…
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is taking some highly unusual steps to counter widespread opposition to his $600 billion plan to jump-start the economy. He’s pressing China to let its currency rise and pushing Congress to pass more stimulus aid.
Yet as he veers into these political debates, Bernanke may be putting at risk the Fed’s strongest tools — its credibility and independence.
…
A wave of pension conversions from defined benefit to defined contribution plans played out on a massive scale twenty years ago in the U.S. private sector. The wave appears to be catching up to the public sector now, and typically, San Diego appears to be the canary in the mine shaft.
As time runs down in San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders’ tenure, his proposals to solve the city’s financial crisis are becoming more drastic. This summer, he embraced a tax hike. Friday, he proposed 401(k)-style retirement accounts for most new city employees, and in turn, eliminating their pensions.
Staring him and everyone else in the face is a $70 million-plus ongoing deficit, one that neither a tax increase or a pension elimination will fix. The tax hike won’t work because voters said no. The pension elimination, which also needs voter approval, won’t save any money for years and wouldn’t go on a ballot until next year at the earliest.
Sanders has two more years to solve the financial problem he was elected to fix. Friday, he recommitted to the task.
“I won’t pass the structural deficit on to the next mayor,” Sanders said.
…
How’s a bankruptcy judge like a symphony conductor?
In the latest edition of San Diego Explained, we explain how municipal bankruptcy works and why the issue’s so complex. It’s done in partnership with NBC 7/39.
And don’t miss our explainer that explores whether pensions are fair game in bankruptcy.
Interviewed in this video are Marvin Hamlisch, principal pops conductor for the San Diego Symphony, and Jan Goldsmith, city attorney for the city of San Diego.
…
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
The Bernake sez…
Bernanke Steps Up Stimulus Defense, Turns Tables on China
Nov. 19 (Bloomberg)
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke took his defense of the U.S. central bank’s monetary stimulus abroad, saying it will aid the world economy, and implicitly criticized China for keeping its currency weak.
The best way to underpin the dollar and support the global recovery “is through policies that lead to a resumption of robust growth in a context of price stability in the United States,” Bernanke said in prepared remarks to a conference later today in Frankfurt. Countries that undervalue their currencies may eventually inhibit growth around the world and risk financial instability at home, he said.
The man is crazy. He wants everyone to do QE along with him. Bailouts for any nation which might topple the house of cards. Can we get rid of this delusional bastard?
“Can we get rid of this delusional bastard”?
Congress can, the President can, he could resign, he could drop dead, but most likely none of it will happen. It appears they all love the show that he is putting on, and The Bernake is very impressed with his own performance.
Most academics generally are…
Can the President really just fire him? Or does he have to be inpeached? These “independent” government agencies are confusing to me in their status.
There’s always the Henry II solution if we have any swordsmen left.
These days you have to offer some cash instead of just muttering about needed some priest offed.
Be careful, Joey might be reading and he’ll go into hysterics over this sort of thing.
“Once appointed, Governors may not be removed from office for their policy views. The lengthy terms and staggered appointments are intended to contribute to the insulation of the Board–and the Federal Reserve System as a whole–from day-to-day political pressures to which it might otherwise be subject. If all Governors serve full terms, a President would be able to appoint only two Governors during a four-year presidential term. Moreover, even a President reelected for a second term would not have appointed a majority of the Governors until late in the second term. In reality, many Governors do not complete their fourteen-year terms, and recent Presidents have averaged more than one appointment to the Board every two years.”
http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqbog.htm
Try looking it up. Very effective.
For more on this topic, as seen from the perspective of a former Governor, read A term at the Fed : an insider’s view by Laurence H. Meyer. He served during the Clinton years.
With regards from your HBB Librarian…
I love how they keep saying “the” global recovery, as if it’s already going on. As if saying it will make it so.
His solution for everything is give more money to the banksters. Cure for cancer? - more money for banksters. The Redskins suck? - more money for the banksters. The banksters are robbing the country blind? - more money for the banksters.
Maybe he believes that if he gives enough money to the banksters. his hair will grow back!
“He wants everyone to do QE along with him.”
How long before the flock infiltrates China’s vital organs?
Let’s be more specific: Bernanke has a personality disorder. His policies are a complete failure. His ideas are stupid. He has no clue what caused the GD, or this one. He has the highest maintenance beard I think I have ever seen.
And whose fault is everything? China.
If he shaved it would make an austerity statement which could panic the markets, I mean banks.
This is kinda fun. Voters lash back at DC, with neither party trusted. Republicans denounce the Fed, Fed knocks China, many central banks attack Fed, trade uneasiness all around, unemployment stuck on high, deficits, unpopular wars.
It was all so peaceful once. The US borrowed and spent, aided by 2 decades of bubbles, globalism polutes, makes stuff and buys some of that debt. Meanwhile, the citizens watch half-billion $ bombers blow up goat herders/rusty mini-vans on the flat screen and feel assured of their unending superiority. It all worked so well until it didn’t!
Now the head clown says this:
‘Bernanke said sluggish U.S. growth, falling inflation and an unemployment rate that has hovered near 10 percent for months convinced Fed policymakers they needed to pump in more stimulus. “On its current economic trajectory, the United States runs the risk of seeing millions of workers unemployed or underemployed for many years,” he said in his speech. “As a society, we should find that unacceptable.”
Here’s the thing; back in 2005, as we got our head around the housing bubble, it didn’t take much to see that massive dislocations in the economy (jobs) were going to be the result. And we still don’t see our “leaders” addressing this directly.
I’ve got a message for the Fed and DC, like the Southpark guy says: “Bubbles are bad, mmm-kay”.
And the Fed was a big player in creating this mess, saying all along that bubbles couldn’t be seen and it wasn’t their “business” to address bubbles in any event. What’s the Fed position on bubbles now? And if we can’t get an answer on that key point, why shouldn’t we kick their sorry ass to the curb?
I gotta agree, Ben. I still believe quite strongly that the troubles were caused by the policies which allowed banks to monopolize and jobs to be exported. You aren’t going to solve this mess with currency tweaks. You have to go to the souce: break up the bank monoplies and start slapping tarriffs on stuff that can and should be made in the US. Smoot Hawley might actually work this time.
“What’s the Fed position on bubbles now?”
Don’t ask — don’t tell.
“Meanwhile, the citizens watch half-billion $ bombers blow up goat herders/rusty mini-vans on the flat screen and feel assured of their unending superiority.”
This is the MAIN reason I voted for Obama. I want us out of the middle east, period. It’s an absolute embarrassment.
“This is the MAIN reason I voted for Obama.”
How is that working out for you?
“….why shouldn’t we kick their sorry ass to the curb?”
Man…you’ve got me there!
The FED appears to be a consortium of large banks. No surprise where their loyalties are.
“And whose fault is everything? China.”
Whew, thank the Lord. It’s about time there was another country the rest of the world can blame things on and shake down. It’s really getting old having the US be the planet’s evil bugger. Hurrah! We can all be a victim of China now, even the US! Dang! It was just SO tiring being the cause of all the evil in the world and having to pay everyone to be our friend.
The US seems to be the only one blaming China; the rest of the world is scared of it
Just look at what happened during the G20 summit. Not a single country supported the US denouncing the currency manipulation by the Chinese; however, everyone criticized the US for what Bernanke did.
Could it be that *gasp* China is becoming as influential as the US?
China seems to be able to get away with anything they do just by denying:
Currency manipulation? It wasn’t me.
Cyber terrorism? It wasn’t me.
Illegal subsidies by the government? It wasn’t me.
Violation of trade agreements? It wasn’t me.
etc, etc
And no one can do anything about it… The Chinese are the new untouchables
Hardly, the real untouchables are on this side of the Pacific.
The Chinese are the ones with the surpluses and job creation. You don’t see much of that around here…
No, the US/China relation is more like that old childhood chestnut:
“I’m rubber and you’re glue. Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!”
China=rubber
US=glue
Curiouser and curiouser…
WSJ Blogs
Real Time Economics
Economic insight and analysis from The Wall Street Journal.
* Geithner Defends Fed’s Mandate To Seek Full Employment
* November 19, 2010, 5:09 PM ET
Central Bankers Give In, And Discuss The Dollar
By Michael S. Derby
The Federal Reserve’s traditional “no comment” relationship with the dollar is proving as challenging to sustain as the currency pegs of nations like China.
For many years, nearly any dollar-related question put to a central banker resulted in a referral to the authority of the Treasury Department, the nation’s officially designated dollar-policy advocate. But as an agreement between the two institutions, the deal was always a bit of a curiosity. The Federal Reserve is the ultimate arbiter of the nation’s money supply and inflation rate. Treasury secretaries may have goals for the dollar — usually, they say they want it strong — but it’s the Fed that has the power to make or break the buck.
Ever since the Fed kicked off its $600 billion Treasury buying program, global blowback has forced central bankers to break with this arrangement and take on dollar issues, if reluctantly. The responses have been all over the map, but they are talking — and that’s of note by itself. Some observers say that despite the increased chatter, officials continue to sidestep how central the dollar is to their policy aims.
A sampling of recent Fed talk finds them on the defensive about this issue, pushing back against notions that their policies are aimed at weakening the U.S. currency.
“We’re not trying to push the dollar to any particular level,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley told CNBC Tuesday. “We don’t have a view about where … the dollar should go,” he said, in an interview that said overseas leaders should be grateful for the U.S. pursuing a policy that will return the nation to health.
Newly installed Fed vice chair, Janet Yellen, told the Wall Street Journal this week the Fed isn’t trying “to push down the dollar” or to start a currency war, as some overseas officials have suggested.
Meanwhile, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said Wednesday that while the Fed isn’t trying to depress the dollar per se, textbook economics would suggest that “a modest currency depreciation is the normal consequence of easing monetary policy.” Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota said Thursday he doesn’t see “big effects” on the dollar from current Fed policy, in a speech where he offered support for the bond-buying program.
The Fed’s leader, Ben Bernanke, has also entered the fray. His highly anticipated address Friday punched back at international critics who think the central bank policy is an unfair manipulation of foreign exchange markets. Emerging economies like China, with its peg to the dollar, are pursuing a “strategy of currency undervaluation” that prevents a needed rebalancing of global economic variables, Bernanke said. If he can say other currencies need to rise in this way, it suggests he’s comfortable with a dollar drop.
…
We will see… State and local governments have too many dependents, gonna be hard to just say no…
New Republican Governors Promise After Elections Cuts Are `Going to Hurt’
The nation’s Republican governors and governors-to-be met for the first time since the Nov. 2 election that gave their party control of 29 statehouses, promising to address budget deficits by chopping the size of government.
“Why do you exist?” Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Corbett said that he would ask every state agency when he spoke yesterday at the Republican Governors Association meeting in San Diego. New Mexico Governor-elect Susana Martinez said she would reduce the public payroll by 5 percent through attrition to deal with a deficit she said recently nearly doubled to $452 million on $5.6 billion in revenue next year.
Democrats held 26 governorships before the election. The Republican victories increased the party’s influence before the 2012 presidential election and gave it more sway over the redrawing of congressional districts and in policies of states trying to recover from the recession.
South Carolina Governor-elect Nikki Haley, a state representative, said she beat candidates with more name recognition by telling voters that she would reduce the size of government.
“We need to be honest and say, ‘This is going to hurt,’” said Haley, when asked how she will explain cuts. “We are heading into a terrible budget year.”
“Why do you exist?” Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Corbett said that he would ask every state agency when he spoke yesterday
To suck the taxpayers dry to pay for our insane public union salaries/benefits/pensions?
It’s been a long, slow trip, but we truly have gone from the concept of “the consent of the governed” (Declaration of Independence) to begging, petitioning, or lobbying for the government’s consent. The governing elite, in concert with the bankers, have become our masters. The passage of TARP and Obamacare against the wishes of the majority are the big examples, but government’s reach extends even to trivial matters like outlawing trans-fats and toys in Happy Meals.
The DOI also prescribes the fix: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
The only question is, will the abolition come about peacefully or by bloody force?
And the TSA seems determined to take the point on destroying liberty.
This used to be the home of the brave. Now I think it’s time to rewite that line.
“Rule by fear”.
Another particularly offensive action by TSA:
“Cancer surviving flight attendant forced to remove prosthetic breast during pat-down”
http://www.wbtv.com/global/story.asp?S=13534628
Also, looks like Big Sis at DHS has rolled over for the pilots and aircrews. They won’t be scanned or groped anymore. Incredibly stupid to start with, they don’t need a frigg’n bomb to crash a plane.. they are *flying* it. Just shows how dumb these tweaks that are “defending our safety” really are. Unreal. The only remedy is vote with your feet. Just say no fly.
Personally, I really want to see security stepped up with young children. We are definitely a lot safer knowing little Jonny is being strip searched as well.
Seriously though, talk about a brain dead policy. Seems like another assault on our freedom in the name of supposed security. Osama bin laden must be laughing all day long any more to see us the way we have become. The way he wanted us to be.
“Why do you exist?” Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Corbett said that he would ask every state agency when he spoke yesterday at the Republican Governors Association meeting in San Diego.
I sure hope he asks that of PA’s antiquated State Store system. That’s where you have to go to buy wine and hard liquor. The selection is abysmal, the service even more so.
How many states have this system or something similar (in MD the stores themselves are independent, but they have to use the state as their only wholesaler)?
The New Hampshire state liquor stores seemed fine when my parents used them, but then they only used the ones right near the boarder and they were competing with the private MA stores.
It’s better than the Texas method of dry counties, dry cities, and dry school districts. Liquor stores are few and far between.
I understand the have them in Utah, staffed by little old LDS ladies who keep an eye out for any of the flock who might wander into the shop.
‘It’s better than the Texas method of dry counties,’
That sure caught me off guard when I moved there in 1979. Long drive through the panhandle, and I thought I could pick up some beer at a C-store, lol. I had to wait until I got to the city of Dallas, where the stores were lined up chock a block on the main drags.
Montana has state stores, and also lets some bars and casinos sell package liquor. State is the wholesaler I guess.
I think Utah has just done away with having to have a sponsor if you want to go in a bar. I guess people just snagged someone walking in and asked them to be their sponsor. How stupid is that?
“I guess people just snagged someone walking in and asked them to be their sponsor.”
Yup. I was skiing in Utah with my family. When my parents ordered a beer, the waitress turned around and said, “See those two men at the bar? They’re your sponsors.”
I think everyone has a similar tale to tell about Utah.
Texas has (or had I haven’t been there for a while) very odd liquor laws. Cities, or even precincts could have local option elections.
The city where I went to College, Denton, was dry as was the county, so any beer, wine or hard liquor had to be purchased in the wet parts or Dallas, about 45 miles south.
An enterprising lawyer set up a trailer park just outside Denton, moved in a bunch of rental trailers , incorporated the thing into a town, held a local option election and viola, was selling beer, wine and hard liquor 5 miles outside the Denton City limits. That all happened about the time I was graduating in 1971, so I’m not sure how long he had the monopoly, but I’m sure he made a fortune.
In those days, even Dallas only had a few wet precincts. Lots of places were wet on one side of the road and dry on the other. I would imagine it has changed in the intervening 40 years.
I haven’t seen any Bowles-Simpson style efforts on the part of the states thus far.
Idaho’s state revenues are down 14% this year, and the state legislature is already in the planning stage for next year’s budget fight.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/11/17/1421484/lawmakers-prepare-for-deep-cuts.html
It ain’t easy to walk the walk…
Obama foreclosure-prevention effort struggles as more than half falling out of program.
WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half of the 1.4 million homeowners who enrolled in the Obama administration’s flagship foreclosure-prevention program have fallen out.
The program is intended to help those at risk of foreclosure by lowering their monthly mortgage payments. But the latest report from the Treasury Department shows that the effort is still plagued by high failure rates.
Approximately 755,000 borrowers, or 54 percent of those who tried to get their payments lowered through the program, have been cut loose through October. That compared to a 53 percent disqualification rate through September.
More than 36,300 homeowners, or 34.6 percent who had enrolled in the program, had received permanent loan modifications and were making their reduced mortgage payments on time. That was up slightly from around 34 percent in the previous report.
Actually, considering how bad the finances of many FBs are, 34% seems pretty good to me. Suspiciously good indeed. If we check back in two years, I wouldn’t be surprised if the re-default rate of that 34% is something like 50%. And it is the upon that re-default rate that we’ll ultimately judge this program. Frankly, the ability to determine quickly that more than half of the FBs that apply are beyond saving is a GOOD thing.
Do you really think it will take two years to get to that? Given how reluctant the banks were to give anyone a permanent modification, I wouldn’t be surprised if an outsized number of those in the 34% got their modifications very, very recently. Is there any info on the median number of months that 34% has been making their new payments? If the modifications were using that 31% of gross income number, they may fall off the wagon very quickly.
Well two years wasn’t intended so much to be a lower bound but an upper one. Certainly considering the high DTI’s allowed, I expect many to fail quickly. But those who have the ability and inclination to make payments for two years are pretty likely to continue to do so.
If the modifications were using that 31% of gross income number, they may fall off the wagon very quickly.
And, polly, didn’t you make the point that 31% of your gross income is like 66% of your net?
I’d venture to say that such figures are typical of a lot of people. And two thirds of net income is one heckuva lot to spend on a wigwam.
Yup. My guess is that anyone with more than two of the following expenses would be in real trouble under that sort of payment: child care expenses, car payments, large commuting costs other than car payments, significant student loans, uninsured medical payments, aiding elderly parents, college expenses, home repairs. I’m sure others could come up with more. Now, I was doing a very rough estimate and I live in a state/county with high income taxes, but 31% of gross has to be pushing the edge for many people. Really pushing.
If you could figure out a way to get the permanent modification first and then have a huge increase in income, it might work long term. Of course, if a lot of people were seeing huge increases in their incomes, there would be fewer defaults in the first place.
My guess is that anyone with more than two of the following expenses would be in real trouble under that sort of payment
Absolutely true, Polly.
My wife and I have a PITI of just about 25% of our gross, and with our second kid heading into daycare, we going to have to cut down on our 401(k) contributions and stop our mortgage overpayment (we pay extra every month currently) to cover the second kid.
We owe no debt besides the mortgage, and our commutes are 3 miles and 15 miles. Adding the second kid immediately put us into careful budgeting/expense cutting. If we had to make payments on our two cars or had student loans, we would turn into ‘paycheck to paycheck’ people instead of struggling to keep our savings rate north of 10%.
Doing the budget for the second kid is what REALLY opened my wife’s eyes to the downside of owning, especially in a bubble.
Well, I’m not going to say I’m glad to hear it, but I am at least relieved to hear that I wasn’t crazy to come up with that analysis. Good for you for keeping up most of the 401k payments. And remember that after school programs are probably cheaper than full on daycare, so there will be some improvement a few years down the line.
Gosh, I think I was hoping deep down inside that someday someone would contradict me on that one. Darn.
I’m pretty sure people could swing 31%, even with extra expenses. But they’d be economizing and living paycheck to paycheck. And strangely, it feels like about half the population is OKAY with living hand to mouth like that. So for them, 31% might even be a minor benefit as the money they are spending on the mortgage acts as a minor form of savings (Assuming the value of their house doesn’t crater, etc etc etc.) and they were just going to spend it anyway on nicer versions of whatever they had to economize on.
But living paycheck to paycheck means that they are going to end up trying to live on social security. Live on it. My parents volunteer with seniors who try to do that. They refer a lot of folks to the local food pantries.
In theory, living paycheck to paycheck because of a mortgage in your twenties and thirties isn’t terrible, as you expect your income to increase and your mortgage to decrease, allowing you to start socking away retirement as your income grows.
That doesn’t seem to be the case for serial house purchasers/refinancers/etc who whenever they get breathing room realize they could afford a bigger house or pull out equity for a dream vacation.
The people living paycheck to paycheck because of credit card debt/etc are in even worse shape.
Those involved in mortgage salvage efforts probably participate with an expectation that RE prices are going back up sometime soon.
Shoot, a lot of the behavior we’re seeing nowadays is based on that expectation. It’s going to take more time.
Obama foreclosure-prevention effort struggles as more than half falling out of program.
It continues to amaze me how much the politicians DON’T get it and how persistent their ignorance is.
I don’t know much about economics, but I was able to find this blog in 2006 and it didn’t take long to see that the combined wisdom here was fairly accurate - why is it so damn hard to get political advisers with the same level of cluefulness?
I’m sure they know it, but if they ever SAID “Well, we’re boned” to the electorate they’d be out on their butts.
Didn’t the baffable GW say “This sucker’s going down”? Or was that my imagination?
HAMP isn’t “struggling.” HAMP is doing a fine job of separating the wheat from the chaff.
Although, now that Fannie/Freddie own most of it, why not let Fannie/Freddie decide who’s worthy of saving, instead giving kickbacks to the (still) greedy banks to be the gatekeepers? Is it a “government takeover of the mortgage market?” You bet your butt. And why not? The government bought the mortgage market as surely as Gordon Gekko bought Teledyne Paper.
How about a seperation of the wheat from the rat turds.
In response to my statement “[t]he real key to a good litigator is to be able to cut through the bs and evaluate the true value of the claim, convince the otherside it is worth somewhat more, and settle at FMV or a slight premium” REhobbyist wrote “[s]o to be a good litigator is to be a lying salesman?”
As to whether being a good litigator is dependent on being a good salesperson, of course the answer is “yes.” As to the lying aspect, of course I do not manufacture evidence or encourage false testimony, nor would doing so be in your best interests if you plan on mantaining your career. Most lawsuits include components that have no precise value (e.g., the value of human life, pain and suffering, lost profits, etc.) and some components that you may have a reasonable basis for requesting but know in advance you may not be granted (e.g., punitive and consequential damages, recovery of attorney’s fees, etc.). As between the client and their attorney, I believe the attorney should counsel the client on what they believe the true value of the claim is to manage expectations and to help decide what settlement amount would be fair. In doing so, you always have to take into the account the chance that you will lose the case (you never know what evidence may emerge to blindside you, or exactly what people will say on the stand, no matter how much you prepare) or that, even if you win, damages awarded will not be best case scenario for you. As between the attorney and opposing counsel, however, you have a duty to be an advocate for your client. As long as you have a reasonable basis for believing your claims or defenses have merit, you shouldn’t be working on the case and you would be a pretty lousy attorney if didn’t project the image that you expect to win on all claims. It is part of the business, and those involved know the rules. Are you saying that you believe it is lying to not to disclose to opposing counsel what you view as the biggest weaknesses in your case, the minimum amount your client would accept, and that even though you have a reasonable basis to make some claims you are not sure you will prevail? If you believe opposing counsel is not as sharp, not paying attention to the case, or for some other reason not doing the best job possible, do you believe you have a duty to help them out so that the actual outcome equals your expected mean outcome going into the case (perhaps even drafting their briefs and motions if necessary)? That is contary to American jurisprudence. Perhaps there was just a misunderstanding in that you read my statement regarding convincing the otherside that your claim is worth more than your expected mean means manufacturing evidence, as opposed to projecting an image that you expect the best case scenario for your client to occur. One is illegal, and the other duty bound.
I buy that. Can you explain why what you do is worth $400/hour?
I agree I have seen fees charged that were greater than the value added. They are, however, determined by the market. Fees of $400 or more an hour or usually reserved for seasoned partners at major lawfirms working on major cases, although there are exceptions. The path to get there is not easy. To get your foot in the door as an associate it is expected that you graduate from a top lawschool near the top of your class and work 70 hour work weeks under extreme stress. Most people cannot handle it or decide it is not worth it to them. Most successful partners have made work their number one priority, more often than not at the expense of their family and/or social lives.
Well organized and sensible answer. A+
Except that my firm was billing me out at $400 in 1997 as a mid level associate. Partners in high end firms were billing out at close to $1000 an hour then. It is certainly a lot higher now.
“I buy that. Can you explain why what you do is worth $400/hour?” You get what you pay for if you do your DD.
When you are knee deep in quicksand and your options are limited, $400/hour can be pretty cheap.
my company engaged a tax attorney that was $ 850 per hour.
he was well worth it. he was a monet and the IRS code was his canvas.
little anecdote about him.
my old boss and i had a 10 minute conversation with him one time about a “what if” transaction. i wrote a one page memo based on his thoughts.
three years later…my company actually followed through on the transaction. his firm was no longer working with my company so my new boss used a big four accounting firm.
three senior big four partners worked on a memo discussing the tax treatment of the transaction. my nwe boss asked me to review their memo. i read it and and then dusted off the old memo from that tax attorney.
a major issue he pointed out was not even mentioned in their memo. when we pointed it out to them they had to go back and completely re-work their conclusions.
i must add though…smart as that guy was…he was one of the bigger dorks i have ever met.
Enrons legal team was worth every penny.
“i must add though…smart as that guy was…he was one of the bigger dorks i have ever met.”
Tax and engineering are some of the few areas in which looking somewhat geeky is an asset. You would be surprised, or maybe not, by the number of people that presume intelligence based on a geeky appearance. And yes, if you are going to engage is sophisticated financial transactions, the quality of your attorney is extremely important.
Tax and engineering are some of the few areas in which looking somewhat geeky is an asset.
Tell me about it!
My dad’s an engineer. Wearing matching socks is quite the challenge.
I’m a (retired) patent attorney, having gone to law school after working 18 years as a EE type. How geeky is that? Patent attorneys have the geekiness of an engineer added to a geekiness of a transactional-specialist lawyer.
A good CRE lawyer in San Jose, CA costs ~$650/hr.
A good friend’s base rate is $450/hour. We used him professionally once for a billed hour.
He made a cooked $20,000 over billing disappear, as in Poof.
ouch.
“…Most lawsuits include components that have no precise value (e.g., the value of human life, pain and suffering, lost profits, etc.)”
“…As between the attorney and opposing counsel, however, you have a duty to be an advocate for your client. As long as you have a reasonable basis for believing your claims or defenses have merit, you shouldn’t be working on the case and you would be a pretty lousy attorney if didn’t project the image that you expect to win on all claims. It is part of the business, and those involved know the rules.”
Natalie & Polly
All I know about the perils of lawyering is based on a true incident recalled by a friend: Woman/wife cheated on Man/husband…at some point in the “subsequent legal process” to legally divide & distribute accumulated wealth, Man follows wife to her lawyers office, pulls out gun,…shoots lawyer…lawyer dies. Shooter said: “I hate my wife, I hate her lawyer even more.”
Same thing happened in a Fort Worth court room 15 years ago. I am always surprised by how nice and pleasant the sheriff’s deputies that run the metal detectors are as compared to the TSA. And they know a lot of the people passing through are serious criminals.
Paragraphs…..they’re your friend.
I post from an Iphone. I gave up on trying to have perfect posts a long time ago.
And I gave up on reading your post one line into it. I don’t care if you post from a Cray.
Well at least I should thank you for taking the time to comment.
Perfect posts are for uptight type-a, spell-checkers with less thought put into what they say then how they say it. I try for at least three typos in all my posts.
Grampa used to say “If I were perfect, then I wouldn’t have any friends.”
He should have used “than”.
Perfect posts are for uptight type-a, spell-checkers with less thought put into what they say then how they say it
I think Your wrong, Its Important too Get it rite;
Yup, gave it a B+. Disclaimer - the grading occured within the range of A+ to D- because here in Amerika no one should get an F.
I believe lawyers, for the most part, only reflect the will of their client.
To that end, we will not get medical costs under control short of overt rationing (either by wealth or some other means) until we stop perpetuating a system where you tell doctors you are at risk to lose everything you ever worked for unless you order every test and every procedure conceivable regardless of cost (which is usually someone else’s money)….
So who should control rationing.
A doctor - ie some may get doctors who ration more or less. People might change doctors to get a doctor who rations less. Is a doctor more or less likely to ration when he is busy or when they need to be somewhere else?
An insurance company - Worst option, insurance companies would say no tx for most things. It would be based on cost not effectiveness.
A national health plan that uses an open cost benefit analysis that any patient can access to determine what the country will pay for.
Measton -
A decade and half ago, I started working in intensive care with the goal of practicing the best cost effective and evidenced based medicine, trying to persuade others from inefficient use of resources focusing on well established guidelines.
After reading and hearing about experiences of fellow specialists and facing a few (unsuccessful) plantiff’s attorneys, I can tell you that nobody gives you a medal for the most cost effective care: Patients are unhappy for tests not done, medications not prescribed. You feel bad for unhappy patients. Your hospital would be happier with more services/billings.
Rationing will come, the question is how bad will it be. It very well may end up as a co-payment based system so patients will ration their own care (or their economic system will do it for them).
Patients are unhappy for tests not done, medications not prescribed.
I guess I’ve been a pay-my-own way gal for far too long. Because if I had someone like mariner22 as my doctor, I’d be dancing in the streets.
Reason: A test not done is a test that I don’t have to schlepp myself to. Or pay for. Same thing for meds not prescribed. That’s a trip to the pharmacy I don’t have to take. And money I don’t have to spend.
I did a customer service training once called “Ugly Orange” or something like that. In it, two parties must come to an agreement about an order of ugly oranges that must be split between the two parties. Both people in this exercise are given a goal and working parameters. My partner and I negotiated the split in about 2 minutes, exceeding both of our goals and completing the task the fastest, because we both laid out everything up front and discussed each others needs and wants openly.
I think I was 19 or so at the time, and that stuck with me big time. I have no idea how it contributes to this thread. Thank you.
Now try the same thing but you and your partner will have lawyers to help you - result - lawyers get the best oranges, and you and your partner get to split the last one, which is now rotten because it took 4 times as long to come to ageement.
Yesterday Natalie had a problem with Polly’s post regarding “bad guy” and “good guy” in civil suits. That’s the way I would think, too, because I presume that regardless of which side an attorney is on he would know the merits of the suit and where his client stood. That’s why I’m glad I went to graduate school and medical school instead of law school. I don’t ever have to deal with the bad guy - only the patient and their disease.
That said, I’ve noticed that my lawyer friends and relatives become more cynical or maybe blind as they age, and ultimately stop seeing the world in bad/good, and care more about winning.
Very few lawyers have the luxury of selecting their clients. If you work for major law firm most of your clients are institutional, and your job is to do your best to represent them or move on. Just as I am sure you get numb to death, lawyers get numb to emotional attachments and learn not to trust anyone except themselves. Since work often consumes them, their ego is tied to their success and reputation, and it is one of the few things they can try to control. I’m not saying it is a good thing. I’m just saying it happens.
“Very few lawyers have the luxury of selecting their clients?” Excuse me, no one forces you to take any client. Well, perhaps the pro bono assignments by judges that you see on TV shows which I doubt happens regularily in real life.
Doctors who work in emergency/intensive care - now we really have no choice in taking whoever needs our help.
“Excuse me, no one forces you to take any client.” Big firm politics usually dictate what deals I work on (and that I drop everything to help institutional clients having an emergency), how much I have to charge (which in itself is limiting), and how many hours I need to bill. In addition, if you are dependant on feeder clients or fellow partners for work, if you reject what they feed you, you are likely to be replaced. Also, if you decide you dislike a client after you have started working on a matter, getting out of it raises a whole host of legal and office politics issues. Very few attorneys that do what I do are in a position where they can say I only want to work on X types of deals with Y types of clients - and have their wishes realized.
[t]he real key to a good litigator is to be able to cut through the bs and evaluate the true value of the claim, convince the otherside it is worth somewhat more, and settle at FMV or a slight premium
What do you think of attorneys who have billboards by the freeway promising “I’ll fight for you”, or “I’ll be your pitbull!”, etc?
Maybe they just have those in Las Vegas…
Sometimes you can survive on your reputation and specialty, and sometimes you have to advertise. I try to survive on my reputation and specialty. I wouldn’t judge an attorney based soley on their advertisements, but I certainly would take it into account.
“Thankfully the hedonically adjusted fiction story released by the Bureau of Lying Statistics came in with a “gasp” indication of more disinflation which caused everyone on Bubblevision this morning to have a joint Fedgasm about how prescient Bernanke was to inflate more money into the system just to bail out the banksters. As long as you do or buy anything outside of eating, driving, getting medical care, or paying for your schooling, then there is no threat of inflation. Thank you Saint Benron for saving us”!
~ John Galt
* OPINION
* NOVEMBER 19, 2010
What’s Really Behind Bernanke’s Easing?
My guess is that the Fed chairman knows that we still have too many banks overstuffed with toxic real estate loans and derivatives.
By ANDY KESSLER
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s $600 billion quantitative easing program has been roundly criticized in this country and around the world. So why is he doing it? Does he know something the rest of us don’t?
Mr. Bernanke claimed earlier this month in a Washington Post op-ed that “higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending.” But, as Mr. Bernanke must know, the Japanese have been trying to influence their stock market for 20 years, with little effect on their economy. It is also unlikely, as some claim, that the Fed chairman is whipping up a stealth stimulus or orchestrating a currency devaluation. He knows these have been tried and are more likely to destroy jobs than create them.
I have a different explanation for the Fed’s latest easing program: Without another $600 billion floating through the economy, Mr. Bernanke must believe that real estate (residential and commercial) would quickly drop, endangering banks.
The 2009 quantitative easing lowered mortgage rates and helped home prices rise for a while. But last month housing starts plunged almost 12%. And in September, according to Core-Logic, home prices dropped 2.8% from 2009. Commercial real estate values are driven by job-creation and vacancy rates, both of which are heading the wrong way.
Because of unexpectedly bad construction loans, the staid Wilmington Trust was sold to M&T Bank earlier this month in a rare “takeunder”—what Wall Street calls a deal done below a company’s stock value, in this case by 40%.
In other words, real estate is at risk again. But Mr. Bernanke would create a panic if he stated publicly that, if not for his magic dollar dust, real estate would fall off a cliff.
…
“What’s Really Behind Bernanke’s Easing?”
“QE2 is largely a waste of time.”
Federal Reserve Inc. (person) = “TrueWizardCorporation™”
Bungee-cord Theory = 1
Rope-around-the-Throat = 0
That’s just the way it’s gonna be
Mr. Bear/Cantankerous-Bomb-Thrower/withered Green ShootsMegaBank mortgage kudzu…Invasive species:
(Mortgage Kudzu was introduced from Japan into the United States in 1990 and is now common throughout most of the
southeasternUnited States. Prior to 2006 Mortgage Kudzu had been spreading at the rate of 2,150,000 loans annually.)The Fed is not pumping money in to the housing market to prevent if from falling. The Fed is pumping money into the banks, which have already failed, to keep them animated like holiday lawn balloon characters.
A “The Nightmare Before Christmas” sort of character:
http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs12/i/2006/294/0/2/Oogie_Boogie_by_chillywilly101.png
I just rememberedthat I forgot to watch the Nightmare Before Christmas on Halloween. It’s kind of become a tradition for me.
Ten-four on the lawn characters. Don’t forget it allows the banks to remain highly “profitable” which makes for large executive bonuses insuring the banks don’t lose “talent” to other ventures.
Yep. Without confidence in the financial soundness of banks financial transactions will not clear and then the economy will screech to a halt.
I forgot the word “perceived”; Without the PERCEIVED financial soundness of banks financial transactions will not clear.
Thank goodness then that the Fed is replacing all the moolah the banksters threw down the toilet on their failed mortgage gambles.
Gambles ???
It’s not gambling when you get bonus money knowing that someone else is going to take the loss.
Good point! They just look like gambles to those who don’t understand too-big-to-fail bailout policy; on Wall Street and Vegas, the house always wins.
But like the WMDs the FBs are the stated excuse for thier actions.
The FBs are the conduits used to direct the flow of money from the Fed to the banks.
Could the FBs be arrested for money laundering then?
“…keep them animated like holiday lawn balloon characters.”
+1 Well said.
Rust Belt Cities Demolish Homes as Foreclosures Blight Cleveland, Detroit
By Brian Louis - Nov 17, 2010 9:01 PM PT
Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) — Cities across the Rust Belt, saddled with abandoned properties under their control as owners stop paying taxes, are choosing to tear down some buildings rather than sell them as residents move to the suburbs and steel, automotive and manufacturing jobs disappear. Bloomberg’s Monica Bertran reports. (Source: Bloomberg)
Cities Burying ‘Dead’ by Demolishing Homes
Cleveland has lost more than half its population since 1950 as the decline of steel, automotive and manufacturing jobs forced residents to leave for parts of the U.S. where employment was growing. Photographer: David Levitt/Bloomberg
Cleveland’s population has been shrinking for 60 years as the city lost manufacturing jobs. Now, after more than 33,000 foreclosures since 2005, it’s demolishing hundreds of deserted, derelict homes.
An agency started last year to manage abandoned houses in Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, plans to acquire as many as 1,000 properties next year, and tear down as many as 900 of them. The city of Cleveland may raze double that amount, according to Gus Frangos, president of Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corp.
“You really have to bury the dead right now,” Frangos said in a telephone interview. “You have to remove blight. It’s unfortunately on a grand scale.”
…
From the article:
“For Sun Belt cities such as Phoenix, where there likely will be greater growth than in Cleveland and Detroit, the more practical strategy may be to hold on to homes until the real estate market recovers, said Terry Schwarz, director of Kent State University’s Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative in Cleveland.”
Here in Phoenix (aka ‘Nuevo Detroit) they’ll be holding on a long time.
Well the the surplus housing stock in the bubbly sun belt IS newer than the surplus housing stock in the rustbelt. But the evidence is that there is a large surplus nonetheless.
See that’s just silly, what Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corp ought to do is “partner” with the local Catholic Churches, give ‘em the houses for free, then have the Pope make x1 brief call to GoldenmanSucks.
(Hwy helps hang the banner: “Doing God’s work,…all together!”)
Ex GF in urban Cleveland (living in mom’s house , presently in estate limbo) now has 4 vacant homes directly across from her; 2 bank owned and boarded up, 2 abandoned and beyond hope, soon, all to become parking lots. All were occupied 2 years ago.
Even decades ago, Cleveland was nicknamed, “The Mistake on the Lake.”
Once the re-undeveloped land has been washed of title problems and environmental liability by the Cleveland tax foreclosure process, I wonder what the city will ask for it. I could see buying up a lot of little parcels as part of a long-term speculative venture. I sure would not want anything that still had a house on it, though.
Ohio still has quite the manufacturing base. And, if the land were free of major problems — being a Superfund site, for instance — I’ll bet that more than a few manufacturers would be interested in it.
2010 a record year for foreclosure filings in Dallas-Fort Worth
12:00 AM CST on Friday, November 19, 2010
By STEVE BROWN / The Dallas Morning News
Dallas-Fort Worth home foreclosure filings hit a record in 2010 – but not by much.
For all of this year, 63,835 homes have been posted for foreclosure in the four-county area, Foreclosure Listing Service said Thursday. That’s only 4 percent higher than 2009’s total.
Foreclosure postings in North Texas were up more than 20 percent in 2009 and 17 percent in 2008.
“The rate of increase has slowed, and it looks like 2010 is kind of the pivotal year as far as foreclosures here are concerned,” said George Roddy, president of the Addison-based foreclosure-tracking firm. “But they are still going to be high into 2011.”
…
But I thought the streets in Texas were paved with gold!
No judicial review required to foreclose in Texas.
U.S. Homeowners Drop Out of Foreclosure Program Amid Record Defaults
By Lorraine Woellert and Clea Benson - Nov 18, 2010 4:26 PM PT
U.S. homeowners are dropping out of the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention program at a faster rate than they are joining it, according to figures released today by the U.S. Treasury Department.
Borrowers aided by the Home Affordable Modification Program grew to nearly 520,000 in October, up 23,750 from a month earlier, the Treasury said in its monthly report. The increase was less than five percent. A total of 36,300 borrowers have dropped out of the plan for failing to make their payments, an increase of 24 percent from a month earlier.
At a congressional hearing earlier in the day, lawmakers said HAMP, which pays lenders to modify loans and reduce monthly payments for struggling borrowers, isn’t doing enough to help homeowners falling behind on their mortgages amid high unemployment and depressed real estate values.
“It’s safe to say that HAMP isn’t meeting its goal of preventing foreclosures,” Representative Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, said at a House Financial Services subcommittee hearing after the Treasury provided a preview of the report.
…
Maybe working on the unemployment is something they should be looking into instead. People without jobs are certainly not going to stay in HAMP.
* REAL ESTATE
* NOVEMBER 19, 2010
Foreclosure Talks Gain Steam
Attorneys General Embracing Broad Strategy to Probe Other Mortgage Practices
By VANESSA O’CONNELL and DAN FITZPATRICK
Talks between major lenders and state attorneys general about the nationwide investigation of foreclosure practices are accelerating, with state officials pushing for an overhaul of the loan-modification process that would be much broader than a crackdown on the use of “robo signers,” people familiar with the situation said.
Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit on Thursday held its first face-to-face meeting in Iowa with the multistate group involved in the investigation. Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller is spearheading the probe. Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. have recently picked up the pace of their talks or are planning to meet soon with key officials in the probe.
…
Regulators criticized for not catching foreclosure crisis
By Ariana Eunjung Cha
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 18, 2010; 8:31 PM
Members of Congress criticized federal regulators for failing to recognize problems with the nation’s foreclosure system before they were brought to light by media reports, and they called for an examination into whether these issues present a systemic risk to the financial system.
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) during a House subcommittee hearing said that a newly created group of senior financial regulators, known as the Financial Stability Oversight Council, should assess the potential impact on the broader economy.
“Why is it you don’t know how these systems work that you regulate? That’s the big question among members on both sides of the aisle,” Waters said.
…
You know, I’m not in the “The bubble was caused by interventions into the free market,” school, but THIS is stupid. The politicians were, for the most part, hell-bent on preventing any any sort of intervention that might have slowed the formation of the bubble. When Armado Falcon (head of the OFHEO, the regulator for Fannie and Freddie) released a report pointing out the systemic risk that they posed he was out of a job THAT VERY DAY. When some states tried to go after either shady mortgage writers, or the crazy bond securitizers, they were quickly forced to back off in the name of federal preemption. The regulator were “hands off” because that’s what the politicians wanted. So this is a case of “How dare you do what I tell you to!”
Didn’t Offenbach write a work called “OFHEO in the Underworld”?
(With apologies to Josefa Heifitz):
“Offenbach,
was often in hock
for underpaid mortgage bills.”
(Sung to the tune of Barcarolle, from Tales of Hoffmann)
“Why is it you don’t know how these systems work that you regulate? That’s the big question among members on both sides of the aisle,” Waters said.”
Ms. Waters, why do you think you were elected to Congress, for you mental prowess?
You owe me a new keyboard.
WRAPUP 3-US lawmakers hit banks, regulators on foreclosures
Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:49pm EST
* Banks say they tightening foreclosure procedures
* Regulators tipped by news reports
* Bank regulator doesn’t see widespread industry issue
* U.S. loan modification program still disappoints
* Lawmakers ask risk panel to weigh servicing spinoff (Adds lawmaker letter, HAMP data update)
…
RE yesterdays UE benefits indefinite extension discussion:
I personally don’t even consider Government assistance an option. Who are all these people that just give up on taking care of themselves by the millions and expect someone else to take care of them? If I were broke, homeless, naked, and starving I would figure something out and take care of myself one way or another. What is wrong with people these days? What happened to innovation and hard work? The basic building blocks of America. If you see me lying in a ditch somewhere, do not feel sorry for me - to only means I exhausted every possible option. Survival isn’t ever guaranteed by anybody. You are responsible.
“You are responsible.”
Man that`s old school.
I pledge Allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America
and to the Victims for which it stands,
one nation unemployed,
it`s not your fault, it`s the evil corporations who outsourced the jobs
with Liberty and Justice for all the people who didn`t know what they were signing and thought real estate only went up
*(the word god has been removed because that might upset someone who is already angry about getting their turban frisked)*
You spelled Amerika wrong.
God wasn’t in the original version. It was added in the 50’s to help us win the Korean war.
There are laws against sleeping by the side of the road.
Not if you are no longer breathing.
Then it’s “littering”.
“Illegal dumping”. Bill me the fine.
Not if you do it on Capitol Hill, or in a state legislature, or at city hall - then it’s called “public service”.
The exception would be those, like my 53-year-old sister, who are truly unemployable. She has never collected unemployment or disability or any other type of assistance, as she is paranoid of government, and instead relies on family to take care of her. I’m just not sure that there’s enough prosperity out there for every family to take care of their relatives who are unemployable, let alone those with disabilities like autism that require lots of professional help, and the elderly who can no longer care for themselves.
But I suspect that there are plenty of families who could do more, but rely on Medicaid or state programs instead.
I’m just not sure that there’s enough prosperity out there for every family to take care of their relatives who are unemployable
Good point, but I’d argue that families would be more capable of doing so if they weren’t taxed at such a high rate.
As things stand right now, the money used to take care of these folks is funneled through a huge, inefficient bureaucracy. That leaves LESS for the people who need help.
Let me take care of my unemployed brother and disabled mother. I’ll gladly do it. As it stands right now, that’s more difficult as a large % of my prosperity is being taken from me by force.
As it stands right now, that’s more difficult as a large % of my prosperity is being taken from me by force.
Like at toll booths?
“Good point, but I’d argue that families would be more capable of doing so if they weren’t taxed at such a high rate.”
American families would use the windfall for a pimped-out SUV.
American families would use the windfall for a pimped-out SUV.
Some might. Many wouldn’t. Many people in this country have a philosophy of taking care of their own.
Global warming is removing all the icebergs we’d need to properly care for the elderly and infirm.
“What happened to innovation and hard work?”
It’s hard to innovate and work hard when the job was offshored.
Let me spell it out for you: There. Are. Not. Enough. Jobs.
And outside of entry level jobs, nobody is willing to train these days. A very bad trend that started back in the 1980s which we, as nation of complete morons, think is normal.
Haven’t you people ever seen those documentaries on the Great Depressions ? Thousands of people where living in tent communities .
There wasn’t jobs ,no matter how hard you tried . Why do you think
they had soup lines . It was a horrible situation and families didn’t have
the resources to help each other often times during those times .
Did the fricken people survive? I thought so.
It is trivial for one person to support one person. And one person may be willing to live in a tent down by the river, but the equation changes when you take responsibility for a family. What I am willing to endure, I may not be willing to force small children to endure.
Much the same down under:
Prime Minister Julia Gillard says she shares the ‘‘uncomfortable feeling’’ Australians have about huge CEO salaries.
A new study shows the average CEO will this year take home $6.4 million in total remuneration.
The Australian Financial Review survey shows executive pay rose by an average of more than $940,000 or 17.2 per cent over the past year. By comparison, the annual wage of a full-time worker rose by $3200, or 5.2 per cent.
And an ACTU study on remuneration shows a typical CEO is taking home almost 100 times what the average worker gets paid.
I guess it’s better than “mildly amused’ …..
Does anyone know a 1%er? Sobering op-ed about our Banana Republic. “…the wealthiest plutocrats now actually control a greater share of the pie in the United States than in historically unstable countries like Nicaragua, Venezuela and Guyana.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/18/opinion/18kristof.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=homepage
A new study shows the average CEO will this year take home $6.4 million
They need it for the “risks” they take by assuming the job.
What’s in your foreclosure?
Guy finds body in his new purchase:
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20101118/BREAKINGNEWS/101118021/1086/Body+found+in+foreclosed+home+in+Cape+Canaveral
And the address was on “Cherie Down Lane”.
Could have been worse - could have happened in the hot summertime.
New article up on floridatoday….they took the old link down.
Appears the skeletal remains may have been there for up to a year.
Suicide? I would guess that car had keys in the ignition, and an empty gas tank. People just don’t up and die in their cars, locked in the garage, all that often.
Oh, and here is a question for the legal eagles here: does the car count as equipment and/or fixtures to the house, and conveyed along under the foreclosure deed? Or does this happy homeowner have to open an estate for the deceased in order to convey it and pay off any heirs?
I think I would you advise him to push the car out to the curb and let the municipality take care of it. It is not his property, so he probably can not be fined for abandoning it.
If it’s on blocks it conveys.
What a waste of a perfectly good Halloween decoration, though!
Cue Chunk from Goonies:
IT’S A STIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!!!
China to Raise Reserve Ratio by 50 Basis Points From Nov. 29
China ordered banks to set aside larger reserves for the fifth time this year, draining cash from the financial system to limit inflation and asset-bubble risks in the world’s fastest-growing major economy.
China tightens up because China is flooded with money. The U.S. loosens up because the U.S. is short of money.
Lol, as if there wasn’t some sort of money flow connection going on here.
Oh, dear, diddums get burnt by the Paper Tiger, boyz? Are ya crying “No Fair!”? Tsk, tsk, such a shame…
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704814204575507353221141616.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Man, they should have seen that coming a mile away.
First off, the Japanese didn’t pioneer high speed rail (per the article) - the USA did. After WW II Japanese engineers traveled here to study our high speed interurbans. Back then one of the fastest was the Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee - which ran its famed Electroliners built in 1940-1.
In 1963 the US abandoned the North Shore Line.
In 1964 Japan kicked off its Shinkansen.
The rest is history, sadly a history that includes a couple of oil wars. And by the way, up until very recently the Chinese were seriously building steam locomotives - locomotives based partly off of Soviet and American designs.
So shame on Siemens, Kawasaki, and Bombardier,et. al.
So shame on Siemens, Kawasaki, and Bombardier,et. al.
Shame on a national policy (er, fetish) that prioritized the automobile over viable forms of mass transit, long-term consequences be damned.
What does surprise me is that the Japanese didn’t forsee the Chinese ripping of their designs.
OMG…this whole China trade debacle is so ironic. When I was a kid the hoary ol’ Open Door crowd was just SO sure that if we’d get China to trade with us, it would be us selling to them. I don;t cry racism much, but really they just never suspected our Little Yellow Brothers could ever catch up with and exceed us. LOL
Lender seizes desperate borrowers’ homes
By Christine Willmsen
Seattle Times staff reporter
Emiel Kandi forever changed the lives of a pregnant hairdresser, a jobless mechanic and a single mom when he loaned them money.
“I am a wolf,” he explained.
Jefferson Marsh, a 56-year-old car mechanic, owned his Puyallup home free and clear for a decade. After he lost his job several years ago, he struggled to pay the bills
By October 2007, he was desperate. He owed $13,400 in property taxes and was about to lose his home in a sheriff’s sale if he didn’t act fast.
He turned to the bank where he had a checking account. he was turned down.
Marsh contacted Kandi
Following Kandi’s instructions, Marsh signed a promissory note for $170,000, even though he was getting only $17,000.
Marsh knew he was paying about $7,000 in fees and interest for the loan. But he had no idea he had signed his house away. Nor did the documents state the true interest rate of the loan, later determined to be 45 percent.
Kandi required Marsh to repay him in person, cash only. Marsh said that after he made the first four payments, Kandi wouldn’t meet with him to accept an April 2008 payment of $1,000.
Kandi denied that, saying Marsh didn’t have the money.
Then he flipped the property, selling it for $235,000 to a former banker who had borrowed money from Kandi in the past. The new owner had most of Marsh’s belongings tossed into the yard. Marsh’s great-grandmother’s hurricane lamp, his grandfather’s banjo and his dad’s ukulele were gone, he said.
And the Kandis walked away with more than $200,000.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2013427831_hardmoney14.html - 93k -
Debt is slavery, sometimes more than others.
I am not surprised a scumbag like Kandi would try to pull something like this off. I am shocked and appalled that the State of Washington does not have the statutes and regs making this clearly illegal and easily prosecuted.
Hey, Kandi,…enjoy your 15 min’s of “Ain’t-I-beetchin!” …as your loans get secularized & you get scrutinized.
Kandi, 34 / Kandi, a former mortgage originator / Kandi skirts mortgage requirements and disclosures by writing up his loans as “commercial.” / Kandi has been able to make hundreds of thousands of dollars.
“He finds vulnerable people and exploits them.”
“State authorities do not regulate commercial loans and the hard-money industry. There are no registrations, licenses or education requirements for the lenders.”
“Kandi is the lender of last resort for some people who’ve been turned down by banks because of poor credit or limited income. He says his requirement for a borrower is merely “a pulse and a legal ability to sign.”
I wonder how many of his “customers” are/were “free market” cheerleader?
Are there not laws against loan sharking?
This “wolf” is going to meet a hunter with a real gun one day.
No kidding!
Remember Oly’s posts about her armaments collection? The one that she kept on hand in case she had to defend her property from Bigfoot?
ISTR that she wasn’t the only well-armed Washingtonian who’s posted on the HBB.
Funny you should mention Olygal. This story about Joan Baez falling out of a treehouse reminded me of her.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/11/19/entertainment/e033930S54.DTL
It’s hard to solve a murder when one has so many enemies.
Which, IMHO, is why the Chick-fil-a hit is proving to be such a tough case here in Tucson.
The hit-ee was a mortgage guy who’d been involved in a rent-to-own scam that got busted. He was popped in a Chick-fil-a restaurant, and there were plenty of witnesses.
What’s worse, the hitman escaped on a bicycle. And you know how slow those things are.
Any-hoo, he hasn’t been caught yet.
The hit-ee was a mortgage guy who’d been involved in a rent-to-own scam that got busted. He was popped…
Do you all think this type of possibility keeps people more “honest” in their dealings than the law and morals do alone?
I hope you have a good alibi Slim!
Mark-to-Make-Believe Perfumes Rotten Bank Loans:
By Jonathan Weil - Nov 17, 2010 9:00 PM ET Bloomberg Opinion
Consider the recent events at Wilmington Trust Corp. The Delaware bank on Nov. 1 said it would sell itself to M&T Bank Corp. for $351 million, which was 46 percent less than its stock-market value at the time. In August, Wilmington had said the fair value of its loans was only $40 million less than their $8 billion balance-sheet value as of June 30.
That term, fair value, was supposed to have been given a uniform definition under a FASB standard issued in 2006 called Statement 157. For financial assets, including loans, the FASB defined it as the sale price that would be received in an orderly, arm’s length transaction. This is known as an “exit price.”
Make-Believe Numbers
Wilmington didn’t use that definition for its loan disclosure. The loophole instead let Wilmington show an “entry price” estimate of how much it would cost to originate similar loans, rather than what its loans would be worth in a sale. That proved to be more like mark-to-make-believe than mark-to-market. Wilmington’s investors got blindsided as a result.
Wilmington disclosed its sale plans the same day it said its third-quarter loss widened to $365.3 million from $5.9 million a year earlier. It also said M&T had identified $506 million of additional credit losses. It’s unfathomable to think that none of those losses started happening until last quarter. An exit-price approach should have provided an early warning. A Wilmington spokesman, Bill Benintende, declined to comment.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-18/mark-to-make-believe-perfumes-rotten-loans-commentary-by-jonathan-weil.html - 56k -
The root of the problem. Until the numbers can actually mean something, we have no idea whatsoever where we are in determining what to do next. Extend and pretend is sabotaging any chance of recovery. But the bonuses are great.
It’s all about the Benjamins…. in MY pocket.
“It’s Over” - A Realtor Finally Speaks the Truth About the US Housing Market
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO5IU3GQlZE - 113k
This is a good one. Watch it folks.
Wow. Sounds like he hangs out here!
Indeed…
Hacker arrested after cracking Federal Reserve
November 19, 2010
A federal grand jury has indicted a Malaysian citizen for allegedly hacking into a computer network at the Federal Reserve Bank and stealing more than 400,000 credit and debit card numbers. Federal prosecutors also allege Lin Mun Poo, 32, made a career of compromising systems at financial institutions, major corporations and defense contractors.
They say he sold or traded the information he found. Also according to the Justice Department, “in approximately August 2010, he hacked into the computer system of a Department of Defense contractor that provides systems management for military transport and other military operations, potentially compromising highly sensitive military logistics information.” Poo was arrested when he traveled to the U.S. in October. If convicted of the most serious charges, he faces up to 10 years in prison.
Lin Mung Poo…. mung and poo in the same name? get the #$% out.
lol.
A thirty-two-year-old Malaysian hacks into our computer systems from somehwere on the other side of the planet and causes all sort of hell here in the U.S.
Somebody here is really dumb, and it isn’t this thirty-two-year-old Malaysian.
There’s no such thing as a pick-proof lock. There’s no such thing as a secure on-line system.
If you have a 256 bit key thats 2^256 different combinations.
Acording to my Windows calculator thats 1.1579208923731619542357098500869e+77 different combinations.
Now if its protected by an ordinary password, that’s another story.
well…Serious encryption is rarely broken by merely guessing keys. The allies never would have broken the Enigma if it hadn’t been for poor procedures on the part of the operators. And for public key encryption the number of possible keys for a 256 bit key ISN’T 2^256. rather it’s related to the set of primes (or is it semi-primes, I don’t remember) less than ~1.1579e+77. Still a huge, ginormous number.
I think you’re talking about permutations vs. combinations, but I won’t quibble.
And I agree, when codes are broken, its due to a lucky strike (like when the Allies captured an Enigma machine).
But even with a working enigma machine, the allies wouldn’t have been able to crack the enigma except for the poor operating procedure of the operators. An early example is as follows: Now even though the rotors and their order within the machine were set centrally, the starting position (letter showing) of the rotors had to be different for each message or the allies could use simple letter frequency analyis to solve ACROSS all the messages sent that day. So there was a standard starting position for the rotors, but that was used only to send the (supposedly random) starting position for that particular message. So far, quite good. But to prevent there from being any mixups and to ensure that the correct message starting positions were received, they were sent twice, without resetting. So the allies knew that the 1st and 4th, the 2nd and 5th as well as the 3rd and 6th letters of a message encrypted the same plaintext. Which could be used to eliminate the majority of possible message settings.
Jim,
Thank you. It is a good day when you learn something new.
Many of the systems don’t belong connected to the public internet.
Exactly.
Someone inside the federal reserve was probably compromised with a social engineering scam. The human element provides the weak link in secure systems.
If you knew just how half-assed computer security was in this country at all levels, you would have a heart attack.
If he stole 400k worth of credit cards, he made at least $50 PER ACCOUNT. The top end for full identity is $300 per account.
He was stupid for even thinking about traveling here. Probably came over pick out a new Corvette.
Dollar to Become World’s `Weakest Currency,’ Drop to 75 Yen JPMorgan Says
By Shigeki Nozawa - Nov 17, 2010 10:25 PM ET
The dollar may fall below 75 yen next year as it becomes the world’s “weakest currency” due to the Federal Reserve’s monetary-easing program, according to JPMorgan & Chase Co
“The U.S. has the world’s largest current-account deficit but keeps interest rates at virtually zero,” Sasaki said at a forum in Tokyo yesterday. “The dollar can’t avoid the status as the weakest currency.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-18/dollar-to-become-world-s-weakest-currency-drop-to-75-yen-jpmorgan-says.html - 52k -
I guess this means we’ll go “greek.”
with or without lube?
The great American consumer…because people are smart!
Black Friday deals: St. Pete family is first in nation to start camping at Best Buy.
St. Petersburg, Florida — Forget just being first in line. These folks are the first in the nation to start camping out at a Best Buy store in search of Black Friday deals.
The Davenport family pitched a pair of tents Wednesday at 10 a.m. in front of the Best Buy at Tyrone Square in St. Pete to snag deals that were still nine days away.
That made them the first people to start camping out at a Best Buy store anywhere in the country. To put that in perspective: there are more than 1,000 Best Buy stores in the United States.
So the manager of the Tyrone Square Best Buy will join the Davenports on Friday, November 19 — a week before the big deal day — to present them with an award.
They’ll be recognized as the “First Family of Black Friday” and get a special gift.
How do they do it? They have ten family members taking turns.
Why do they do it?
“We’re here really early this year because we’ve always been second, third and fourth and down the line,” Lorie Davenport said.
“We’re tired of not being first and we figured we’ve put in six years, we want to be first.”
Only in America. Where consumerism is a competition.
Where consumerism is a competition ??
I agree…Get a life for god’s sake…Kind of embarrassing really…
It is beyond embarrassing. It is mental illness.
It’s not worth it - they might miss dancing with the stars and america’s biggest loser.
No, they are America’s biggest loser.
Does anyone else smell a publicity stunt?
Sees like the modern day equivalent of flag pole sitting to me.
Or maybe the equivalent of the “Bonus Marchers” encampments of the last depression.
Which were broken up rather violently.
Publicity stunt? This has been going on for decades.
“How do they do it? They have ten family members taking turns.”
That’s ten people who don’t value their time very highly. Sad.
From a recent interview of ol’ Noam by Der Spiegel:
“Consumption distracts people. You cannot control your own population by force, but it can be distracted by consumption. The business press has been quite explicit about this goal.”
Combined with state-of-the-art psycho warfare techniques and most people don’t stand a chance.
Real American Heros: Bud Light Commercial
“Here’s to you, mister black-friday camper-outer guy”
No bull$hit, we already have professional competitive eating. Why not professional competitive consuming?
Get a life.
Several federal agencies have issued warnings to all large retailers that they must have adequate crowd control in place or face heavy fines.
Which reminds me of a joke I heard last year:
So I went to a Wally World Black Friday sale and a hockey game broke out.
What? The recession is long passed and The Bernake has it all under control…Or so we’ve been told.
~ Few Businesses Sprout, With Even Fewer Jobs. ~ WSJ
Fewer new businesses are getting off the ground in the U.S., available data suggest, a development that could cloud the prospects for job growth and innovation.
In the early months of the economic recovery, start-ups of job-creating companies have failed to keep pace with closings, and even those concerns that do get launched are hiring less than in the past. The number of companies with at least one employee fell by 100,000, or 2%, in the year that ended March 31, the Labor Department reported Thursday.
That was the second worst performance in 18 years, the worst being the 3.4% drop in the previous year.
Newly opened companies created a seasonally adjusted total of 2.6 million jobs in the three quarters ended in March, 15% less than in the first three quarters of the last recovery, when investors and entrepreneurs were still digging their way out of the Internet bust.
Bernanke came accross as really gay in his latest speech. I think he is losing control of his sexuality as well as every thing else he falsely assumed he had control over.
“Bernanke came accross as really gay in his latest speech”
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
For many years, I was represented in Congress by Jim Kolbe.
He was outed in 1996, and shortly after he was, I met him at a Tucson business networking event. He was campaigning for re-election.
I was mystified as to how Jim Kolbe could have stayed closeted for as long as he did. I mean, the guy had a way about him that would trip off the gay-dars from miles around.
Any-hoo, he was re-elected that year. And he continued winning elections until he decided to retire in ‘06.
Difference between wrong and unstable.
Are you claiming that Quantitative Easing causes homosexuality?
The undesirable side effects are completely unknown and appear to be limitless. “The Fly” comes to mind.
Wait, are you now claiming that homosexuality is undesirable? Because I have it on good authority that it’s FAAAAABULOUUUUUS!
Jeez…
First look at the blog this morning and there’s a re/max banner ad with a big photo of that hideous, haggard-looking RealtLiar Margaret Kelly.
What a way to start a Friday.
“Having the right agent is more important than ever.” She smugly proclaims. As if a reator’s make-up job is key to not getting screwed.
In her case, it is.
Except in the opposite direction.
QE2 indirectly buying commercial RE? $31m for a bad strip-mall.
A local story just popped up that makes no sense whatsoever. The aging strip-mall featured in the article has absolutely nothing going for it. An outdated movie theater-complex, a serial failure restaurant location, and a crappy old-school Home Depot. Something really fishy is going on here:
http://www.news-journalonline.com/business/local-business/2010/11/19/volusia-square-sale-biggest-deal-in-years.html
$160. per foot could be the motivation particularly if Home Depot is in on a long term lease…
Home Depots don’t lease.
Maybe they discovered gold??
Home Depots don’t lease ??
Huh ??
He’s right. Some may, but of them are built and owned by the corp. on corp. land. Think about it. Ever see a Home depot actually connected to another building?
Usually, no.
“a serial failure restaurant location”
Funny how every community has a few of those.
Here in Tucson, there was one of those within easy walking distance of the Arizona Slim Ranch.
I say *was* because the last restaurant went out of business and then the place just sat there. And sat there.
There was an attempt to sell, but that failed too. So the restaurant building was bulldozed.
A very busy gas station now operates from the same location.
Harrah’s Shelves $531 Million IPO on Market Conditions
Harrah’s Entertainment Inc., the world’s biggest casino company, said that it terminated its $531 million initial public offering due to market conditions.
The casino company taken private by Apollo Global Management LLC and TPG Capital was scheduled to sell 31.3 million shares for $15 to $17 yesterday, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and data compiled by Bloomberg. Las Vegas-based Harrah’s planned to change its name to Caesars Entertainment Corp. before the initial offering.
Taken private by Apollo during rising RE prices now wants to unload to public through the exchange. Let’s hope they hold on to the bitter end!
And you all want to “Audit the FED” …fine, which of you wants to ‘xplain it all to the rest of us mis-fit-wee-li’l-people?:
http://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/content/dan-teri-securities-transaction-process-reverse-engineered
Ho ho, hah hah, hehehehehehe, BwaHaHaAhHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! (Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower™)
Here’s a report from Central Texas. We’ve just made another offer, this one on a lovingly maintained late 1970s 2100 sq. ft. 4BR/2.5BA in a location that would allow my husband to walk to work and allow us to remain a one-car family. The only objectionable thing about it is that the kitchen is basically original. They want $220k. We have offered $165k and told the sellers that our offer is good for two weeks. We’ve got two kids in private school, so we really can’t budge too far up on our offer. I’m going to hate it if this one gets away. On the bright side 1) they are closing on another house in three weeks and 2) we still have a good year and a half left before we have to leave our rental.
Where in Central TX? Austin? What part of town?
Good luck, Amy! Sounds like you are in the drivers seat on this one. I hope it works out for you.
As for us, well, DD is so happy in her new school, and we want to keep her there, so our househunting area has been contracted considerably. Its okay, though, because lots and teardowns have come down to where we can build new for close to the same as wishing price of existing homes.
I just saw one active listing reprice itself 8% lower in one shot - a far cry from the days of a seller offering a <1% reduction and thinking they were doing the world a favor.
Do you have any other options?
From a local real estate blog:
“if you talk to listing agents, showings on most listings are very slow and a lot of homes are getting pulled from the market. In the first chart, note that in Oct, 60% of all listings that departed the Austin MLS were failed sales efforts. ”
It wouldn’t surprise me if the seller decides not to sale and holds on to the house and rents it…
In the first chart, note that in Oct, 60% of all listings that departed the Austin MLS were failed sales efforts
I can’t help thinking that these were failed efforts because the price was too high for Mr. Market. You know him. In the end, he wins.
With Texas prop taxes, going to private school there is a double bummer.
Amy, I don’t want to rain on your parade, but double check if it has aluminum or copper wiring.
Texas is indeed different…
I am currently paying $1450 for a 870 sq ft apartment in the heart of downtown Austin… When I moved in two years ago, parking was free…. My lease will be up in 80 days… I got a letter from management indicating my new parking bill will be $80 and my rent will go up to $1630. My total bill will be $1,710 or an increment of ~18%.
Apparently, higher end 1-bedroom units are in high demand…. I spent the last couple of days looking at other units within the area, and every single complex has raised the prices and decoupled rent from parking… I could not find any other complex nearby that could match the price, size or location… The only way for me to keep a similar rate would be to compromise location OR to take one of the 500 or 600 sq ft studios
I also took a look at resale condos in nearby buildings. However, buying doesn’t make a whole of sense with the high property taxes in Texas (2.5%) and the high HOA costs. For example, there are two comparable units in the 360 condos, which are 2 blocks away from where I currently live:
-Unit for rent is 748 sq ft on the 18th floor facing west. Going rate is $1650.
-Unit for sale is the same floor plan, but on the 19th floor also facing west. Sales price is $279,900. Annual Taxes $6,078. Monthly HOA fees of $277. If I were to put 20% to avoid mortgage insurance and I got a 4.75% interest on my loan, the monthly payment would be $2,126.
Renting for $1650 or buying for $2,126 a month…. why would anyone do that?
Financially, I am doing great…. single engineer, no student loands, no credit card debt, no car payments… who are these people renting/buying high end apartments/condos in downtown Austin?
I know Austin is nice, but geez can the very many people there pay that?
Apparently there are many. Over the past 24 months, there have been 8 new apartment buildings in the downtown area: super high end Ashton with rents starting at 2100. In addition, they opened Legacy on the Lake, Cole, Gables Pressler, Gables Park Plaza, Gables 5th Street Commons and Red Rivwr flats. All those start around $1500 for 600 sq units. There are even 500 sq ft studios being leased for $1,300.
In addition, you have rentals in all the new condos and multiple other apartment complexes that are less than 5 years old (Monarch, AMLI downtown, AMLI on 2nd, some other Gables, 400 N Lamar). You will not find anything under 1400 but they are tinny units. AMLI om 2nd has a 626 sq ft unit going for 1700.
Maybe the producers of “Mega Movers” could arrange to relocate some massive condoze from Las Vegas and Miami to Austin? They could borrow the big tracked-thingie from NASA that they used to bring the space shuttle to the pad - they don’t need it anymore…
I am amazed at the building that occurred in downtown Austin. I know two people that purchased condos for thier kids to live in while going to UT.
“I know Austin is nice, but geez can the very many people there pay that?”
It’s the state capital, so there must be no shortage of well paid bureaucrats. Dell and and a few others also have a major presence there.
That is true, but Dell and many of those business are FAR from downtown. There’s no way anyone would wanna sit through an hour of traffic when there are beautiful suburban communities much closer to your work.
Brett, there is no “demand” except from the property owners colluding and “demanding” more money.
It’s just way they’ve always done business there.
Move.
Renting for $1650 or buying for $2,126 a month…. why would anyone do that?
#1…You would do it so you don’t continue to get the increased rent notices like you just received…
#2… Assuming tax laws did not change (which is a big assumption) your effective payment (plus principal reduction) would be well below what you are paying in rent…
Not suggesting that it would make sense for you, But it could make sense for someone given the close relationship of the two payments…
I might add that I was quite stunned that downtown Austin rents are that expensive…It appears that it is comparable to the other major metro’s in the country…
Dude, mine is at the low end prices of downtown apartments… You can easily pay 2k+ for 1br/1ba units if you go to nicer/larger apartments.
Gee’s…Maybe there a reason its that expensive…Must be fun…
It’s a blast to live downtown. Safe, got great bars/restaurants, got the lake, can get laid any day of the week, beautiful people everywhere… Lol
can get laid any day of the week ??
Is it the water or the women ?? Kind of hoping its in the water so this old man can drag his wife down there and give her a couple of pints of it…
It’s the margaritas/martinis/beer… LOL
Got It….Somethings never change…Best inhibition eliminator ever… Alcohol !!
So there is a fornication bubble underlying the Austin housing bubble?
That’s what is underlying every urban condo bubble! Don’t think so? Visit one and observe for yourself.
Oooops, market - not bubble. Poor word choice.
Actually, nowdays that condo in Austin that Brett cites can be beaten quite easily up here in Chicago.
Last week I read about a short sale of a condo of similar size to Brett’s 748 sf unit mentioned- and one that included parking and was on a higher floor - all for $100k! Plus, the taxes were half what he quotes for that Austin condo (but the HOA was double).
Things are really screwy right now in condoland (US urban markets), best to wait until this shakes out.
I would rather rent in San Diego, where I go for quality not quantity (laid).
I saw a recent list where Austin was ranked as the best city for singles and with one of fittest communities. There’s a ton of good looking people everywhere.
Dude, mine is at the low end of prices for downtown apartments… You can easily pay 2k+ for 1br/1ba units if you go to nicer/larger units.
There’s a really nice 900sq ft unit across the street where I live. The rent is 2200 a month. The finishes and ammenities are nicer; the unit is new, but that’s a low of $$$ for Texas
Property taxes are 2.5% in Austin. That’s not going down any time soon; they might actually go up to close budget gaps. HOAs can only go up.
I am not sure how you can deduct my effective monthly payment would be lower.
how you can deduct my effective monthly payment would be lower ??
Well, it depends on your tax bracket but since you can afford this type of rent I am assuming you do pretty well income wise…
Your interest is deductible…Your HOA is deductible…Your taxes are deductible…Your earlier statement said “Renting for $1650 or buying for $2,126 a month”…If you can claim a 30% deduction on that payment your effective payment would be $1488. AT…
How is the HOA dues deductable?
30% deduction… Is that realistic?
Well sure is…Someone on the board here can tell us what the GSI is for a 30% bracket or so.
Factor in the insane prop taxes!
I think you got it wrong my friend:
“5. Homeowners association fees
Forget homeowners association fees for maintaining common areas. Any fees specifically identified as your portion of taxes and/or interest would be allowable.
If you get a bill without a breakdown, none of the fees is deductible.”
If you get a bill without a breakdown, none of the fees is deductible.” ??
You get a breakdown annually from the HOA..Its mandatory…Sometimes semi-annual depending on the size of the complex…Even quarterly for really big ones…
By the way Bret…Is downtown “Bicycle Friendly” ??
Fed chief Ben Bernanke argued in a speech in Germany today that the Fed’s Treasury bond purchases are needed to promote faster job creation and reduce the risk that very low inflation could turn into deflation.
Even so, the Fed’s program by itself can’t fix all the economy’s problems, Bernanke said.
“There are limits to what can be achieved by the central bank alone,” he said, tamping down expectations.
~~Fed Can’t Do It Alone~~
< This should cause a shudder among Americans. Bernanke says the Federal Reserve System needs help to get the economy rolling again. Whence cometh the help? From the U.S. Congress. Think “another stimulus package.”
Crazy, to be sure, but that’s the track the experts are following. Dr. John Maynard Keynes, a dead but very influential economist, is still running the game. Unemployment high? Print money. Debt load making the economy sluggish? Take on more debt. These policies are leading to a tragic ruin of the U.S. dollar.
Jim Jones can’t drink the Kool-aid alone or on your behalf. YOU must drink deeply for you own wellness. Let us all drink together…
He sure does go to great lengths to qualify all his statements, I wonder who he learned that from?
Bond purchases=job creation?! Say What?!
How about ending tax breaks for offshoring jobs?
Greece Needs Deflation to Be Saved: Economist
Greece needs to go through a period of deflation to return to competitiveness and ensure sustainable growth, John Sfakianakis, group chief economist at Banque Saudi Fransi, told CNBC Friday.
Greece’s lack of competitiveness is a major issue that is not being addressed and it, coupled with the burgeoning debt, could stall the country’s return to growth considerably, Sfakianakis said.
“Right now in Athens coffee is going for 4 euros, so you cannot have a competitive economy when you are charging everybody an arm and a leg. Deflationary economics have to set in, in order for Greece to become competitive,” he said.
How to save Greece:
Default
Leave the Euro
Print your own money (hmmm - wonder what to call it).
Become the cheap place to visit and to hire labor you once were
Add a few zeros to your currency every few years to keep insane public union pensions under control
Hey - it worked for 200 years…
I imagine the ratio in D.C. must be around 1 out every 2.
Nearly 1 in 5 Americans had mental illness in 2009
CHICAGO - More than 45 million Americans, or 20 percent of U.S. adults, had some form of mental illness last year, and 11 million had a serious illness, U.S. government researchers reported on Thursday.
Young adults aged 18 to 25 had the highest level of mental illness at 30 percent, while those aged 50 and older had the lowest, with 13.7 percent, said the report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration or SAMHSA.
The rate, slightly higher than last year’s 19.5 percent figure, reflected increasing depression, especially among the unemployed, SAMHSA, part of the National Institutes of Health, said.
“Too many Americans are not getting the help they need and opportunities to prevent and intervene early are being missed,” Pamela Hyde, SAMHSA’s administrator, said in a statement.
In a related story, 20% of Americans think that it’s never been a better time to buy!
20% of Americans think pro-westling is real.
Pro wrestling is so yesterday. Now it Mixed Martial Arts.
I wonder how one of the todays MMA guys would fare against Andre the Giant? Assuming of course that it wasn’t rigged.
I am an MMA fighter, I would need 45 secs against Andre. I weigh 185.
DC? More like 10 to 1.
Web Censorship Bill Sails Through Senate Committee
Who says Congress never gets anything done?
On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved a bill that would give the Attorney General the right to shut down websites with a court order if copyright infringement is deemed “central to the activity” of the site — regardless if the website has actually committed a crime. The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) is among the most draconian laws ever considered to combat digital piracy, and contains what some have called the “nuclear option,” which would essentially allow the Attorney General to turn suspected websites “off.”
It is dead now thanks to a senator from OR.
It should not pass.
Let’s ask the Chinese how web censorship is working.
YOU CAN’T CENSOR THE WEB. That ship has sailed.
U.S. sending tanks to Afghanistan for first time
Washington (CNN) — The United States is beefing up its firepower in Afghanistan by employing heavily armored tanks in Afghanistan for the first time in the nine-year war, a military spokesman said Friday.
The U.S. Marine Corps plans to use a company of M1A1 Abrams tanks in restive Helmand province by early spring, said Marine Maj. Gabrielle Chapin.
The M1A1 tank is the fastest and most deadly ground combat weapons system available. It will allow for more aggressive missions while mitigating risks to U.S. forces, the military said.
U.S. forces used the tanks to battle insurgents successfully in Iraq’s Anbar province, Chapin said.
Economic Stimulus: The company that makes the tanks must need to sell more right now. I bet somebody’s uncle’s brother-in-law put the deal together. The military picks up quite a bit of slack as evidenced by Dick Cheney’s demonstration.
Repeating a question that Helen Thomas asked a few months ago: Why are we *in* Afghanistan?
Because the Taliban refused to turn over Bin Laden and dared to ask for evidence any of the 9/11 events were plotted from Afghanistan.
All the evidence pointed to Germany or Saudi or Pakistan, so we invaded Afghanistan.
Makes lots of sense now doesn’t it?
IIRC the Russians used tanks in Afghanistan in their 1980’s decade long war. One problem; the main gun could only elevate a few degrees. The insurgents simply climbed higher up the mountain than the main gun could elevate. From there they launched anti tank weapons. It took the Russians a long time to modify their tanks.
“Everyone knows that the entire apparatus of the [airport] security line is a national homage to political correctness. Nowhere do more people meekly acquiesce to more useless inconvenience and needless indignity for less purpose.” ~Charles Krauthammer
So says he in November 2010, but in November 2001? Commentators like him are part of the reason we have this issue now. From patriotic duty to meek acquiescence all within a decade.
No, actually Krauthammer, who is a neocon, has always been against the type of airport screening that we do in the US. He’s probably more of a fan of Israel’s screening. They are less tech-oriented, and do more interviewing, profiling.
They are less tech-oriented, and do more interviewing, profiling.
Brazil does a lot of interviewing/questioning on flights to the USA.
Bubble Flashback:
“Mortgage Products” - Huge pet peeve.
You know its a bubble when lenders are advertising mortgage products. Its a freakin’ loan, there are no products!
No other lender can do what Countrywide can.
Or as the banner proudly proclaims at a local Chase branch: “Loan sale”
Which reminds me of those stores that fly banners urging people to “Shop Here And Save!”
Which makes me respond by saying, “Stay home and save even more!”
Kids…ya know I love ‘em! (for context: the deadline to declare candidacy for mayor of Chicago is this Monday)
(From today’s Chi Tribune)
Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart said today he will resume foreclosure evictions as early as next week despite continuing questions over the legality of bank paperwork.
He said he wanted bank attorneys to sign a sworn affidavit saying they had verified the foreclosure was valid before he would carry out an eviction for them. But none would, he added.
Now, he said, the Cook County state’s attorney’s office has told the sheriff’s office it must attempt to enforce all foreclosure eviction orders that are signed by a judge, even if a review by sheriff’s staff finds some irregularities in the file. The state’s attorney advised that once a judge signs an eviction order, it is is presumed to be valid, he said.
Kids…ya know I love ‘em! (for context: the deadline to declare candidacy for mayor of Chicago is this Monday)
Has Rahm kicked his tenants out yet?
Has Rahm declared formally yet?
Yes, but Dart is not going to do so.
The bond vigilantes may have woken up first in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal. “But France,” Roubini says, “does not look much better than the periphery.”
In Roubini’s view, the probability of the right steps being taken in France soon is not great. “Politically they are constrained from making reforms.” For example, after the French made relatively small changes in their social welfare system-raising the retirement age from 60 to 62 -”You had massive riots in the streets.”
And that, in Roubini’s view, was just the beginning of the necessary austerity.
“What’s going to happen when you do more radical reform? That’s an open question in the case of France.”
Looking beyond France to the future trajectory of the crisis, Roubini says, “The next one in line is going to be Portugal. “Due to the severity of Portuguese debt problems, Portugal is going to lose market access-and that means they are going to require IMF support as well.
But the real nightmare domino is Spain. Roubini refers to the Spanish debt problems as “the elephant in the room”.
“You can try to ring fence Spain. And you can essentially try to provide financing officially to Ireland, Portugal, and Greece for three years. Leave them out of the market. Maybe restructure their debt down the line.”
“But if Spain falls off the cliff, there is not enough official money in this envelope of European resources to bail out Spain. Spain is too big to fail on one side-and also too big to be bailed out.”
I just think the average person would be much more willing to take a hit in retirement etc if the banking elite who caused this mess took their medicine too.
Meredith Whitney Plans to Launch Rival Rating Agency
Meredith Whitney, a Wall Street analyst who shot to prominence with bearish calls on banks before the financial crisis, plans to set up a credit-rating agency to go head to head with Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s.
Meredith Whitney
Ms Whitney said in an interview with the Financial Times that her new agency would use the same business model as established agencies, in which issuers of debt pay for ratings. She maintained that she would be able to manage potential conflicts of interest, saying: “If you run a good business and you have compliance in place, there should not be problems.”
Indeed, the huge amounts of debt financing and refinancing activity that has been going on this year in the capital markets, particularly in the US bond markets where interest rates are at record lows, have boosted revenues for the biggest rating agencies. Bond sales by companies with “junk” or “high yield” ratings, for example, are higher this year than they have ever been before.
You go, Meredith!
I’m a fan of hers, too. She seems forthright and has been willing to be bearish/honest about the past few years.
“If you run a good business and you have compliance in place, there should not be problems.”
I wish her the best. What is really needed is lots more competing raters. Eventually those whose ratings pan out would survive, and those whose ratings prove to be rubbish would go out of business.
By the way, my suggestion is based on the principles of free-market capitalism. With very few ratings agencies, the risks of group think stupidity or collusive coordination of ratings to satisfy client preferences is very high.
Sadly, I bet Meredith runs into a stone wall similar to the one Tucker encountered with the Big Three. The criminal syndicate called Wall Street won’t let outsiders into their club.
The Big Three made that serious mistake with Deming as well.
I bet the guys that actually made the decision were able to make their money before the company paid the consequences.
At NATO summit, Obama’s ride is talk of the town
Whoops, President Obama must have missed the memo on this one.
While the Portuguese prime minister and the Portuguese president of the European Union’s executive commission are tooling around the NATO summit here in no-emission electric vehicles, Mr. Obama is fouling the Lisbon skies with his no-efficiency “Beast,” the eight-ton, diesel-fueled behemoth of a limousine the president carts around the world with him.
Oh, and to drive the point home, journalists attending the summit are being ferried to events in electric buses, as well.
A “note to the media” left at every journalist’s work station in the summit press center says the use of electric vehicles is meant to raise awareness of Portugal’s “world pioneering leadership in electric mobility.” Portugal claims to derive 45 percent of its electricity consumption from “clean” energies. Its “Mobi.E” electric mobility network – with 100 charging stations in 25 municipalities around the country, set to rise to 1,300 charging points by mid-2011 – is considered a world leader.
But the Portuguese press is more interested in the Beast. Pages in Lisbon newspapers have been dedicated to cutaway renderings of “Cadillac One,” with charts and boxes offering every detail of the vehicle that the Secret Service divulges: the Kevlar tires, the special foam in the gas tank to immediately extinguish any fire from a direct hit, the supply of presidential blood.
Another point of fascination is the unparalleled security detail to accompany Obama as he moves from bilateral meetings with Portuguese leaders to the summit venue to the Lisbon Marriott Hotel, where he may or may not sleep. (Another overnight option, to keep everyone guessing, is the residence of the US ambassador to Portugal).
While Obama’s motorcade is accompanied by the 35 Portuguese police motorcycles, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev – who arrives for a three-hour visit Saturday to participate in a NATO-Russia Council meeting – will get no such treatment.
On the bright side for Mr. Medvedev, he – unlike Obama – will be able to claim that his modest transport is more in line with the NATO meeting’s green theme.
ISTR some sort of event where Obama was asked about greening The Beast. His reply was that he’d asked about running the car on clean energy, but the Secret Service nixed the idea.
Sorry to say, but if you want to power a heavy vehicle like the Beast — and give it some pickup — gasoline is still the best fuel choice.
Diesel is actually the power of choice for heavy stuff. Less explosive too, if the vehicle were attacked.
Not so, Slim—bio-diesel burns almost identically to dino-diesel, and would be an incredibly-simple way to power The Beast.
Paranoia is rampant now in the federal government.
But the Portuguese press is more interested in the Beast.
I’d cruse the Beast too. That’s one bad 8-ton ride.
More crap stirring by the press.
When they make an electric armored vehicle that is also impervious to EMP, I’m sure the President will get one… right after everyone stops complaining about the cost.
Dude! Gotta pay your taxes…
Wesley Snipes to Be Ordered to Prison for Tax Evasion (AP)
A federal judge granted a government motion that actor Wesley Snipes be ordered to prison.
Snipes had been convicted on tax evasion charges in 2008.
His attorneys had requested a new trial, but that motion was denied on Friday by U.S. District Court Judge William Terrell Hodges.
Earlier this month, federal attorneys had asked a central Florida judge to revoke Wesley Snipes’ bond if the actor was granted a new trial, but it looks like that point is now moot.
Snipes’ attorneys argued he deserved a new trial because of jury bias in his 2008 conviction. They said two jurors were accusing other jurors of deciding the case without hearing evidence.
They also said prosecutors hid damaging information about a key witness.
Federal prosecutors argued interviewing those jurors about their deliberations would violate juror rules, and intimidate future juries.
The star of the “Blade” trilogy faces a three-year prison sentence.
Why didn’t he agree to pay the back taxes and a penalty to avoid this? NUTS!
what-a-dumb-ass
How much did Exxon pay in taxes last year?
Exxon Mobile paid $81 billion world wide in taxes imn 2009
Amount of taxes paid in the county with the highest corporate taxes in the developed world (America) - $0
I think there is a lesson in there somewhere…
Why does the USA still subsidize Exxon?
So James Carville has been saying Hillary should some of her testicular fortitude w/Obama so then they’d both have some. The comment was in reference to how he’s handled the banks. He he he! That’s just beautiful.
Reposting Jeff Saturdays link. This is a great commentary.
“It’s Over” - A Realtor Finally Speaks the Truth About the US Housing Market
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO5IU3GQlZE
Don’t you wish the Fed could explain the situation that clearly? We need glasnost at the Fed.
This guy is truly amazing. I hope to meet him some day. He has the most honest, simple, forthright explanation of how Megabank, Inc systemically steals from middle-class American families that I have heard to date.
75-year Ponzi scheme demystified:
Are The Social Security Trust Funds A Mirage?
Categories: Government, Debt
01:21 pm
November 19, 2010
Proposals to fix the deficit are coming fast and furious in Washington these days. One major target: Social Security.
Whether you favor cutting Social Security may depend on how you view the Social Security trust funds, which currently contain $2.5 trillion for retirement benefits. That’s $2.5 trillion that, according to some people, don’t actually exist.
Here’s the back story.
If you look at your paycheck, in the spot where it lists deductions, there’s a line that says “FICA.” That’s the money that gets taken out of your check to pay for Social Security.
For the past 25 years or so, the amount of money the government has raised through those taxes has been greater than what it’s been spending to fund Social Security.
The surplus came largely from the baby boomers — and we’re going to need that extra money when they retire and start collecting Social Security.
This is where the $2.5 trillion trust funds come in.
The government has invested all that money in Treasury bonds, which are traditionally considered among the safest investments in the world.
But a Treasury bond, remember, is the way the government borrows money. So the government is lending the Social Security surplus to itself. And the obligation to repay those loans is the trust funds’.
“They are nothing like any trust fund that any one of us would think of,” says Maya MacGuineas of the New America Foundation. “It conjures up an image of really holding savings, and it doesn’t do that at all.”
* NOVEMBER 19, 2010, 1:09 A.M. ET
WORLD FOREX: Dollar Drifts Lower Against Yen As Bernanke Defends QE2
By Kosaku Narioka
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
TOKYO (Dow Jones)–The U.S. dollar fell against the yen in Asia Friday from a fresh six-week high hit overnight in New York, after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke mounted a strong defense of the Fed’s easy-money policies.
In remarks prepared for delivery Friday in Frankfurt, Bernanke showed his resolve to continue with the Fed’s second round of quantitative easing.
“On its current economic trajectory the United States runs the risk of seeing millions of workers unemployed or underemployed for years,” Bernanke said. “As a society, we should find that outcome unacceptable.”
Bernanke’s remarks followed comments by other Fed officials who supported the easing steps to stimulate the U.S. economy. Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Narayana Kocherlakota, who was presumed to be uncomfortable with the Fed’s recent decision to buy $600 billion in longer-dated Treasurys, said late Thursday, “I did express support for the decision at the recent meeting (of the Federal Open Reserve Committee).”
Foreign exchange participants sold the dollar in reaction, pushing it lower.
“Although some recent U.S. economic indicators turned out to be stronger than expected, comments from Fed officials have given the reassurance that the Fed is going to implement the QE2 just as it announced,” said Satoshi Tate, senior vice president of the foreign exchange division of Mizuho Corporate Bank.
…
Oh my — just when it seemed like the financial crisis was finally dying down, it looks like Goldman Sachs may be in for another thirty lashes with a wet noodle. Oh, the humanity!
* HEALTH INDUSTRY
* NOVEMBER 20, 2010
U.S. in Vast Insider Trading Probe
By SUSAN PULLIAM, MICHAEL ROTHFELD,JENNY STRASBURG and GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
Federal authorities, capping a three-year investigation, are preparing insider-trading charges that could ensnare consultants, investment bankers, hedge-fund and mutual-fund traders and analysts across the nation, according to people familiar with the matter.
The criminal and civil probes, which authorities say could eclipse the impact on the financial industry of any previous such investigation, are examining whether multiple insider-trading rings reaped illegal profits totaling tens of millions of dollars, the people say. Some charges could be brought before year-end, they say.
The investigations, if they bear fruit, have the potential to expose a culture of pervasive insider trading in U.S. financial markets, including new ways non-public information is passed to traders through experts tied to specific industries or companies, federal authorities say.
One focus of the criminal investigation is examining whether nonpublic information was passed along by independent analysts and consultants who work for companies that provide “expert network” services to hedge funds and mutual funds. These companies set up meetings and calls with current and former managers from hundreds of companies for traders seeking an investing edge.
Among the expert networks whose consultants are being examined, the people say, is Primary Global Research LLC, a Mountain View, Calif., firm that connects experts with investors seeking information in the technology, health-care and other industries. “I have no comment on that,” said Phani Kumar Saripella, Primary Global’s chief operating officer. Primary’s chief executive and chief operating officers previously worked at Intel Corp., according to its website.
In another aspect of the probes, prosecutors and regulators are examining whether Goldman Sachs Group Inc. bankers leaked information about transactions, including health-care mergers, in ways that benefited certain investors, the people say. Goldman declined to comment.
…
* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* NOVEMBER 20, 2010
The Fed’s Bipolar Mandate
Time to repeal the Humphrey-Hawkins Act of 1978.
If there is a silver lining to the uproar over the Federal Reserve’s decision to create $600 billion in new reserves in the next few months, it is the renewed public attention to the Fed’s impossible dual political mandate for stable prices and maximum employment.
To be specific, Paul Ryan suddenly has company. The Wisconsin Congressman has since 1999 proposed legislation that would let the Fed focus monetary policy solely on the goal of stable prices. This week he’s been joined by fellow Republicans Mike Pence of Indiana and Tom Price of Georgia, while Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee told us he plans to work with Mr. Ryan to introduce legislation next year that would lift the dual mandate. If the 112th Congress did nothing else, this would be worth the price of its election and a major contribution to better economic policy.
These columns have decried the dual mandate since it became the law of the land in 1978 with the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act, aka Humphrey-Hawkins. To appreciate the problem, consider that in the original Federal Reserve Act of 1913 Congress asked the central bank to supervise banks. It did not mention explicit economic goals. Even in the Keynesian heyday of the Employment Act of 1946, Congress did not ask the Fed to manage the economy.
But with Humphrey-Hawkins, Congress ordered the central bank to “promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates.” The political context in that age of Jimmy Carter will sound familiar. U.S. unemployment was stubbornly high and the fiscal policies (tax rebates) of a Democratic Congress had failed to stimulate. So the politicians decided to conscript the Fed in its job creation mission by ordering the ostensibly independent central bank to target employment as well as prices.
The contradictions were as apparent then as now; as Mr. Corker puts it, a central bank cannot have “a bipolar mandate.” The pressure to bring down unemployment using money creation during difficult economic times will inevitably complicate the task of maintaining stable prices. As the Fed pushes money out the door, whether or not there is an economic demand for more dollars, there will be an illusion in the short-run that people are better off. But the longer-term effect may be inflationary as too much money chases too few goods.
…
Turns out that jobs today are more important to the world outside California than dire prospects for catastrophic consequences of global climate change that are supposed to happen at some indeterminate point a century or more into the future.
The Wall Street Journal
* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* NOVEMBER 20, 2010
Cap and Retreat
The largest U.S. carbon market collapses.
A cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions has been touted by environmentalists as a market-friendly mechanism to reduce global warming. Well, the market has spoken. The Chicago Climate Exchange, which advertises itself as “North America’s only cap and trade system for greenhouse gasses,” is shutting down.
The CCX launched to great fanfare in 2003 with a grant of some $1.1 million from the Joyce Foundation. Time magazine called company founder Richard Sandor a “hero of the planet.” The exchange got off to a blazing start with hundreds of companies—from DuPont to Ford to Motorola—voluntarily agreeing to buy and sell rights to emit CO2 above a legally binding quota. At its peak in May 2008, CCX was trading 10 million tons of carbon permits per month. The price of carbon offsets rose from $1 a ton to a high of $7.40 in mid-2008.
The market collapsed in 2009 when the price fell to $1, and trading all but ceased this summer. The fate of the carbon trading market closely followed the prospects of passing a mandatory federal cap on carbon emissions in Congress. Once the Senate rejected the cap-and-tax scheme—because the tax would have cost millions of jobs—many corporations suddenly lost interest in paying for greenhouse gas emissions. A market that green groups had predicted would exceed $500 billion a year in trading is now flat-lined. The only place cap and trade is still alive and well is, alas, California.
If you decide to buy a foreclosure home, by all means don’t hesitate to ask questions about former occupants. Can banks be charged in the deaths of home owners who are facing eviction? What if it turns out someone dies because of an erroneous robo-signing eviction?
Body in 1 foreclosed Fla. home, death in another
By TAMARA LUSH
The Associated Press
Friday, November 19, 2010; 3:42 PM
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — A man who bought a foreclosed Florida home discovered a body in the garage, and it may be that of the former owner, authorities said Friday.
The man went to the home in Cape Canaveral on Thursday, a day after buying it, Brevard County Sheriff’s Major Andrew Walters said. He found the body in a car in the garage.
Walters said it’s unclear how long the body had been there, or how the person died. An autopsy was underway.
News of the gruesome find came the same day as a 71-year-old man in Gulfport, across the state, died after shooting himself in the head Monday as he was about to be evicted from his home under foreclosure.
Boyd Rubright shot himself as a sheriff’s deputy tried to drill through the lock on his front door, police said.
The body in the Cape Canaveral house was believed to be that of a woman, Walters said. Investigators think it may the home’s previous owner, because she hasn’t been seen for a while. She went through foreclosure earlier this year.
Mortgage lender Wells Fargo & Co. sold the home Wednesday. Neighbors told authorities that the woman had “disappeared” some time ago.
In Gulfport, foreclosure proceedings against Rubright began two years ago, court records show.
Gulfport Police Sgt. Robert Burkhart said the eviction was scheduled for the weekend but was postponed for a few days, Burkhart said. On Monday, when a deputy went to the house to evict Rubright, the officer knocked and received no answer.
That’s when he began drilling the lock and heard a single shot.
Burkhart, who later responded to the scene, said Rubright was discovered in a recliner with a .357-caliber revolver in his hand.
Authorities spoke with Rubright’s family, who said the elderly man had lived in his home for 20-plus years.
“He had mentioned to them that they were not going to take his house from him,” Burkhart said. “They, I assume, meaning the bank.”
It must be great to be Too-Big-to-Jail!
Foreclosure Foul-up: Tracking Down Those ‘Lost’ Mortgages
By Stephen Gandel Monday, Nov. 29, 2010
One of a million foreclosures this year.
Anthony Suau for TIME
Trevor Douglas, 54, may soon lose his Orlando house. Sure, Douglas hasn’t paid his mortgage in more than two years, which is what a Bank of America spokesperson tells me “is important to remember.” It is. Still, if it happens, I will feel partially responsible. I helped push Douglas closer to eviction.
Like many other home loans, Douglas’ IOU was bought and sold numerous times and finally packed into a bond. So when his foreclosure notice finally arrived, the entity trying to kick him out was one he had never heard of, something called GSAMP 2005-HE3. Worse, GSAMP said it had lost the original document — called a promissory note — to prove they owned his loan. Douglas hired a lawyer, who got the foreclosure put on hold. And that’s when I showed up. Much of the ire focused on the banks recently has been on their use of robo-signers — low-wage workers hired by banks to witness and sign hundreds of thousands of foreclosure notices without verifying that the grounds for the evictions were valid. On Thursday, a Federal Reserve official told lawmakers on a House Financial Service subcommittee that U.S. bank regulators are conducting a review of the banks’ foreclosure practices. In hundreds of thousand of cases, the promissory note that proves a bank owns a borrower mortgage is now gone. Vanished. Some borrowers may walk away scot free. In other instances, banks may be forced to dramatically reduce what a borrower owes. Many foreclosures have already been halted by the courts or by the banks themselves. Still, bank officials say, even if they are missing the original promissory note, they have the paperwork to prove they own the mortgages. (See pictures of Americans in their homes.)
Just how bad is the problem? TIME dug into the mortgage of one troubled borrower. What we found suggests that many promissory notes are not lost. In an effort to rush homeowners to foreclosure, and hide damaging information, bankers’ have needlessly created a huge legal mess that once again questions the financial industry’s credibility and ethics. “They [banks] don’t comply with the law when they’re taking people’s homes,” says Michael Olenick, who owns Legalprise, a legal research firm.
…
25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis
The good intentions, bad managers and greed behind the meltdown
Angelo Mozilo
Photo Illustration; Mozillo: Mark Wilson / Getty; Getty
The son of a butcher, Mozilo co-founded Countrywide in 1969 and built it into the largest mortgage lender in the U.S. Countrywide wasn’t the first to offer exotic mortgages to borrowers with a questionable ability to repay them. In its all-out embrace of such sales, however, it did legitimize the notion that practically any adult could handle a big fat mortgage. In the wake of the housing bust, which toppled Countrywide and IndyMac Bank (another company Mozilo started), the executive’s lavish pay package was criticized by many, including Congress. Mozilo left Countrywide last summer after its rescue-sale to Bank of America. A few months later, BofA said it would spend up to $8.7 billion to settle predatory lending charges against Countrywide filed by 11 state attorneys general.
…
Chicago-area sheriff resumes foreclosure evictions
(AP) – 7 hours ago
CHICAGO (AP) — An Illinois sheriff who halted foreclosure evictions last month because some bank employees weren’t following the proper procedures said Friday he’s been forced to order his deputies to carry them out, but he will continue investigating the matter and could charge banks and their employees with crimes.
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart said he is only ordering evictions to resume because county prosecutors told him that he was legally bound to carry out foreclosure eviction orders signed by a judge.
“For the people who have been involved with this and think now that because the (Cook County) State’s Attorney’s office has ordered me to go ahead with the evictions that everything’s fine . . . No, we are going to be looking at you for criminal violations,” Dart said. “You may have got through one storm now, the other one is coming.”
Dart singled out Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and GMAC/Ally Financial last month for problems with eviction notices. He said Friday that investigators continue to find problems with bank employees signing off on foreclosure documents they haven’t read, although he did not single out individual companies.
“When we asked a month ago . . . send me an affidavit to say that everything was done legally, not one organization, law firm handling these cases, not one of them sent in one document,” Dart said. “Not one, and they had over a month to do it.”
The sheriff said that if anything, his office’s investigation has shown the problems that prompted the moratorium were even more widespread than he first thought.
“We are being overwhelmed with abundant evidence that there are irregularities,” he said, adding that just a cursory investigation by his financial crimes unit has shown problems in eviction order after eviction order. “Irregularities are going on all over the place here. It’s the norm.”
…
Mortgage Foreclosures - What’s the Rush?
I was talking to a friend of mine this morning who is a defense attorney, and we were discussing some of the facts of the mortgage cases our firm is handling. As I’ve mentioned in previous cases, many of these mortgage companies are representing that they will review the clients’ situation for a modification, or approving their modification, and at the same time, they proceed with foreclosure.
While we were talking, it struck me. What’s the rush? Why are these banks moving so quickly to foreclose? Why are they putting themselves in this position? It doesn’t make sense.
The current situation in the United States is unprecedented. These banks have never had so many loans in default. The banks, even though very large (Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, CitiMortgage, etc.), are not equipped to handle all of these modifications and foreclosures. So, why not slow down? Quit rushing the process. You don’t have to foreclose immediately. You don’t have to commit fraud and misrepresentations. You don’t have to throw people out on the street.
Why are they rushing? Well, I can only think of a couple reasons. First, many of the people handling the modifications and foreclosures are low level employees, and they do not think outside the box. They are given their structure and told what to do, and they are scared to deviate even if it means helping the customer.
Second, there might be some accounting, tax and/or regulatory reasons why the banks have to get these bad loans off their books. If this is the case, then maybe we need new legislation to address the problem. However, if they weren’t losing documents and making people file their packages on multiple occasions, they might not need to rush to foreclosure.
We have been successful in helping a couple people with these issues, but there are thousands suffering. Hopefully, in the future, better processes will be developed, and better decisions will be made. Until then, the court dockets will continue to increase with these types of cases.
Stay tuned . . .
Sell now, or get priced in forever by future waves of foreclosure sales!
Foreclosures, Markets
Sellers, here’s your chance
Posted by Scott Van Voorhis
November 19, 2010 06:22 AM
Home sales have plunged since the home buyer tax credit breathed its last in April.
But now, thanks to the robo-signing scandal, along comes another artificial stimulus to prop up the housing market.
Hammered with questions over the validity of foreclosure paperwork, banks are pulling back big time, putting on hold both initial foreclosure petitions and foreclosure deeds, the last step in the process.
Foreclosure petitions fell 51 percent in October, while foreclosure deeds, representing completed home seizures, fell 39 percent, according to The Warren Group, publisher of Banker & Tradesman.
Now don’t get fooled here into thinking this is some great boost for the battered housing market. In fact, there are already some suggestions to that effect, unbelievably really. While this could prove a short-term boon for sellers - stick with me, I will get to that - it is likely to prove another unfortunate roller coaster ride for the housing market as a whole.
Just wait until the spring, when foreclosure petitions and takings soar after the major banks work out the paperwork kinks. After all, the foreclosure crisis was already on track to set new records here in Massachusetts and across the country before the robo-signing controversy erupted.
So we are looking at a temporary lift followed by another deep dip, similar to what happened this summer after the home buyer tax credit went away.
But for anyone faced with having to sell a home, yes, the next few months could prove to be a rare opportunity akin to what we saw last spring in the months leading up to the end of the credit.
…
Peter Ticktin fights his own home foreclosure by Deutsche Bank
By Diane C. Lade, Sun Sentinel
November 19, 2010
Peter Ticktin, the South Florida attorney who has received national attention as a foreclosure defense expert, has something in common with his clients: He is fighting the bank to keep his house.
Deutsche Bank National began foreclosure proceedings on Ticktin’s Boca Raton home in 2007 after the lawyer and his wife fell behind on their loan. The couple haven’t made a mortgage payment since December 2006 and continue to live in the 3,920-square-foot house in Paradise Palms.
Ticktin has fought Deutsche Bank using the same strategy that he’s been able to use for his clients: uncovering sloppy paperwork and poorly prepared mortgage files. In the Ticktins’ case, Deutsche Bank didn’t have their mortgage note, a problem that has surfaced in tens of thousands of foreclosure defense cases nationwide.
Deutsche Bank dropped its foreclosure action in February after the Ticktins’ attorneys claimed they didn’t have enough information to respond because there was no note. The bank refiled the foreclosure last month, saying it has original affidavits showing it has the right to foreclose.
“It’s embarrassing that I’m in foreclosure. But I now understand my clients better than some lawyers who never had a problem in their lives,” said Ticktin, whose firm is handles 3,000 foreclosure defense cases at two Florida offices, one in Deerfield Beach and one in Tampa.
He said he’s confident he and his attorney, Jamie Sasson, can defend against the action. “[Deutsche Bank] doesn’t have the paperwork,” Ticktin said.
…
Isn’t it great that the recession and the banking crisis are finally over, so America can get back to business as usual again?
Real Estate Weekly
Nov. 19, 2010, 5:01 p.m. EST
This week’s Real Estate stories
By MarketWatch
Foreclosures got attention on Capitol Hill this week, as the Senate Banking Committee heard testimony related to foreclosure paperwork problems plaguing lenders.
The “robo-signing” controversy that caused some lenders to halt foreclosures might be a bigger crisis than originally thought, said Christopher Dodd, the committee’s chairman.
The problems could further deepen the current foreclosure crisis, said Diane Thompson, a lawyer for the National Consumer Law Center, in her testimony to the committee.
“The lack of restraint on servicer abuses has created a moral hazard juggernaut that at best prolongs and deepens the current foreclosure crisis and at worst threatens our global economic security,” Thompson said, according to a news release. “Recent exposures of robo-signing and lack of ownership documentation by servicers have taken the wraps off a servicing system that has failed homeowners, investors and our society.”
Meanwhile, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Thursday that a greater percentage of mortgages entered the foreclosure process in the third quarter.
…
007 Financial Survival Podcast –
Reggie Middleton Reveals the Nasty Little Detail Left Out of the Case-Shiller Home Price Index
by admin on October 28, 2010
Reggie Middleton
We’ve got an interesting discussion this week with financial analyst Reggie Middleton of the BoomBust Blog.
Earlier this week, the S&P Case-Shiller Index of home prices was released, reflecting a 0.3% drop in home prices in August 2010 from the previous month. Doesn’t sound too bad, right? But wait — Reggie tells us that in averaging the current price of houses in certain US markets, the Case-Shiller boys left out a few little, um, important details…
Reggie also talks about his background in real estate investing, and the warning signs that led him to exit the New York real estate market.
Dumb question of the day:
Can (does) the Fed use QE2 to directly prop up housing prices?
I was under the impression that debt from the housing (FHA), the big three (GMAC, CC, FC), student loans (SM), consumer credit cards (AE, MC, Visa, etc.) as well as commercial paper losses have all been purchased (at par?) by the federal reserve bank, which they add to their balance sheet. The entire process is called QE. FWIW, I never once heard the term QE during my education.
I’m too busy supporting a family to pay attention to the details, but that’s my simplistic assumption, PB.
Reggie says that Case-Shiller/S&P 500 excludes foreclosures from their data. This obviously skews the index to the high side, as the percentage of recent home sales transactions which are foreclosures approaches 50 percent of the market in some areas.
If this guy knows what he is talking about, the Case-Shiller index is nothing but an upwardly-biased statistical lie.
The rate of home sales has plummeted in The OC. Further significant price declines are in the bag, especially once the robo-signer paperwork issues are cleared up and foreclosure sales kick back up into overdrive.
Published: Nov. 16, 2010
Updated: 5:18 p.m.
Housing prices flat, sales sinking
By JEFF COLLINS
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
The housing market continued to struggle against fierce headwinds last month, losing ground in the face of tightfisted lenders and edgy buyers.
The median price of an Orange County home – or price at the midpoint of all sales – fell to $438,000 last month, housing tracker MDA DataQuick reported Tuesday.
That’s the lowest since April and up just 0.3 of a percentage point (or $1,500) from the October 2009 median.
Find out how the rest of Southern California’s housing markets did on Lansner on Real Estate.
Meanwhile, sagging sales stretched into their fourth month, with 2,298 Orange County homes trading hands in October.
That’s 9 percent fewer than in September and 17.9 percent below the October 2009 tally.
While sales typically drop from September to October, last month was the second-slowest for an October since DataQuick began tracking home sales in 1988. It also was nearly 36 percent below the average of around 3,600 housing deals in a typical October.
The market appeared to be on fire during the first half of the year. But industry insiders now fret that state and federal tax breaks failed to ignite a stronger, longer-lasting recovery after ending in the second half.
“A lot of us were disappointed that the wind that would be in our sails just faded,” observed Jeff Culbertson, executive vice president for Coldwell Banker’s Southwestern U.S. region, which includes Orange County.
“We’re not in a bad market,” Culbertson added. “But we’re not in a good market.”
…
Which kind of criminal is worst: A bankster, a fraudster or a thief?
Mark-to-Make-Believe Perfumes Rotten Bank Loans: Jonathan Weil
By Jonathan Weil -
Nov 17, 2010 6:00 PM PT
Bloomberg Opinion
Just when it looked like U.S. banks were starting to reveal the true values of their loans, it turns out there’s an accounting loophole they can exploit to keep bad news buried.
Ever since new rules took effect last year, lenders have been required to disclose the “fair value” of their loans each quarter. The results have been something of a mystery, though. Some banks show large disparities between these numbers and the loan values on their balance sheets. Others don’t.
One big reason: Thanks to the loophole, they don’t all have to follow the same definition of fair value. My guess is most investors don’t know this. Often lenders’ disclosures don’t clearly explain which approach they’re using, or that companies have a choice. Unsuspecting readers of their financial statements easily could be misled.
…
I’m guessing we will see no housing bottom until well after Fannie and Freddie are shut down.
Housing downturn has hit bottom
The Business Journal - by Jeff Clabaugh
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 3:10pm CST
Total housing sales in 2010 will be down about 8 percent from last year, and will mark the bottom of the downturn, says a monthly report from Fannie Mae economists.
…
High wind, indeed!
HIGH WIND WATCH
Bernanke on perilous ground for Fed chairman
Last Update: 11/19 4:17 pm
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is taking some highly unusual steps to counter widespread opposition to his $600 billion plan to jump-start the economy. He’s pressing China to let its currency rise and pushing Congress to pass more stimulus aid.
Yet as he veers into these political debates, Bernanke may be putting at risk the Fed’s strongest tools — its credibility and independence.
…
A wave of pension conversions from defined benefit to defined contribution plans played out on a massive scale twenty years ago in the U.S. private sector. The wave appears to be catching up to the public sector now, and typically, San Diego appears to be the canary in the mine shaft.
Posted: Friday, November 19, 2010 6:49 pm
Mayor Proposes Eliminating City Pensions
by Liam Dillon
As time runs down in San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders’ tenure, his proposals to solve the city’s financial crisis are becoming more drastic. This summer, he embraced a tax hike. Friday, he proposed 401(k)-style retirement accounts for most new city employees, and in turn, eliminating their pensions.
Staring him and everyone else in the face is a $70 million-plus ongoing deficit, one that neither a tax increase or a pension elimination will fix. The tax hike won’t work because voters said no. The pension elimination, which also needs voter approval, won’t save any money for years and wouldn’t go on a ballot until next year at the earliest.
Sanders has two more years to solve the financial problem he was elected to fix. Friday, he recommitted to the task.
“I won’t pass the structural deficit on to the next mayor,” Sanders said.
…
San Diego Explained: Bankruptcy
Posted on November 17, 2010
by Dagny Salas
How’s a bankruptcy judge like a symphony conductor?
In the latest edition of San Diego Explained, we explain how municipal bankruptcy works and why the issue’s so complex. It’s done in partnership with NBC 7/39.
And don’t miss our explainer that explores whether pensions are fair game in bankruptcy.
Interviewed in this video are Marvin Hamlisch, principal pops conductor for the San Diego Symphony, and Jan Goldsmith, city attorney for the city of San Diego.
…