May 7, 2006

Buyers ‘Want The Price Cut And Get It’ In Chicago

The Chicago Tribune announces, ‘It’s a buyer’s market.’ “It’s been a long time, at least five years, since the Chicago area’s real estate market worked this way. Homes sell in months, not hours. Prospective buyers actually browse. They drift back for a second look at a place weeks later, confident that it still will be available. They want the price cut. And they get it.”

“That means it’s time for a seller attitude adjustment, real estate agents say. Think about making a mere profit rather than a killing. ‘I tell sellers, this is not the market we used to have,’ said Gold Coast agent Jeri Dry. ‘I tell them to be prepared for a six- to nine-month marketing time, and that’s if they’re priced correctly. It could be a year,’ Dry said. ‘Lots of condos have been on the market for 300 days.’”

“What has changed in terms of verifiable statistics is that the inventory of homes on the market has surged, even for the traditional spring selling season. Faced with so much competition, many sellers are being counseled to settle in for a longer wait, and think hard about their asking prices.”

“‘You tell them, `Tighten your belt as tight as you can get it,’ said Deerfield real estate agent Honore Frumentino. She said that North Shore homes in the $2million to $4 million range, which already had been selling slowly in 2005, are getting even less attention now. ‘We had a three-year supply of those homes last year, now it’s up to five,’ she said.”

“In the first four months of 2006 the Chicago-area market took on about 97,000 new listings of single-family homes and condos, up from 83,000 new listings in the year-earlier period, according to the Multiple Listing Service of Northern Illinois.”

“A leading concern is that while the number of homes on the market is higher, the pace of sales has not changed. That translates into an advantage for buyers. ‘I’m worried about selling,’ said (appraiser) Chip Wagner, whose home in Naperville went on the market about two weeks ago. ‘There are 30 percent more listings this year than there were at the same time last year, and 20 percent fewer homes under contract,’ Wagner said.”

“‘This is a year when I’ve had more low-ball offers, people coming in $60,000 to $80,000 below asking prices,’ said Oak Park agent Donna Karpavicius, who recently took over another agent’s languishing ‘needs work’ listing of a home in Riverside. She immediately got the price reduced to $429,900 from $489,500 but has received little response, other than a couple of too-low offers around $350,000.”

“‘There’s a type of seller who expects they’ll be able to finance their 2-year-old daughter’s Yale education on the sale of their two-bedroom, two-bath,’ said North Side agent Lino Darchun. ‘They don’t understand the concept of ‘comps.’”

“Mike Malloy took a long, hard look at the ‘comps’ last weekend when he met with Downers Grove agent Veneris. ‘If this were last year at this time, I’d be telling him to go $10,000 higher,’ said Veneris. Malloy said he is philosophical about the $10,000 difference that a year can make. He’s not greedy, he said.”

“He paid $199,000 in the heat of the boom; the home had been on the market just one day when he bought it in 2003. He figures he’ll do well if it sells anywhere near his $274,000 asking price. ‘I’ve only been here three years, so either way, that’s a lot of money,’ he said.”

“Some industry analysts see other factors at play. Analysts say that some buyers have gotten skittish, they’ve heard the word ‘bubble’ so many times that they are holding back, waiting to see what happens. At some point enough people start to think things are slowing down that they behave differently, creating the self-fulfilling prophecy of a slower market.”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

12 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-05-07 09:20:40

Thanks to the readers who sent in this link.

Comment by Northern VA
2006-05-07 11:33:45

WARREN BUFFETT- weighs in on the housing bubble. http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/05/news/newsmakers/buffett_050606/index.htm

 
 
Comment by incessant_din
2006-05-07 10:00:56

Of course it’s the talk of bubble that is keeping buyers from paying 38% more than he did 3 years ago. Darn us all.

 
Comment by looking4mee
Comment by looking4mee
2006-05-07 10:14:51

From Harpers Magazine for May “The New Road To Serfdom”

I am off to go buy it today, here is part of what was said, so they are not my words.

Free markets are based on choice. But more and more homeowners are discovering that what they got for their money is fewer and fewer choices. A real estate boom that began with the promise of “economic freedom” almost certainly will end with a growing number of workers locked in to a lifetime of debt service that absorbs every single spare penny. Indeed, a study by The Conference Board found that the proportion of households with any discretionary income whatsoever had already declined between 1997 and 2002, from 53 percent to 52 percent. Rising interest rates, rising fuel costs, and declining wages will only tighten the squeeze on debtors.

But homeowners are not the only ones who will pay. The overall economy likely will shrink as well. That $200 billion that flowed into the “real” economy in 2004 is spent, with no future capital gains in the works to fuel more such easy money. Rising debt-service payments will further diverty income from new consumer spending. Taken together, these factors will further shrink the “real” economy, drive down those already declining real wages, and push our debt-ridden economy into Japan-style stagnation or worse.

Then only the debt itself will remain, a bitter monument to our love of easy freedom.

Maybe we’ll look back on these as the good times?

 
 
Comment by Breck
2006-05-07 10:23:12

This was especially interesting since it was the headline on the front page section of the Sunday tribune. It wasn’t burried in the 20 sections of real estate ads.

Comment by sfbayqt
2006-05-07 11:16:42

Where are you Breck? What tribune are you reading? I’m in the SF Bay Area.

BayQT~

Comment by sfbayqt
2006-05-07 11:17:17

Oops! ok, Chicago Tribune.

 
 
 
Comment by SchnooksIL
2006-05-07 11:24:50

Yep.. Chicago Trib! My husband told me yesterday that that was going to be the front page article… hurry up and get this thing going so I can get my dang house in the NW burbs!

SAHM renter.

 
Comment by Brad
2006-05-07 11:33:45

more from the Harper’s article:

“Never before have so many Americans gone so deeply into debt so willingly.”
And: “…a modern equivalent to peonage, a lifetime spent working to pay off debt on an asset of rapidly dwindling value.”

Comment by skipintro
2006-05-07 11:46:53

“…a modern equivalent to peonage, a lifetime spent working to pay off debt on an asset of rapidly dwindling value.”

Trouble is, it’s not rapidly dwindling in value.

Comment by Gekko
2006-05-07 14:35:44

not yet.

 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post