May 20, 2011

The Bad Juju Was Somehow Overlooked

It’s Friday desk clearing time for this blogger. “A Del City family fears they may be out on the streets after a shocking notice appeared on their door Tuesday. Nick Evans and his brother packed up their families earlier this year and moved from Reno, Nevada to Oklahoma looking for a new life. Evans was able to find work right away, but as soon as they moved in to a rental home in Del City, they knew something was wrong. When they moved in, the city wouldn’t let them hook up water because of an issue with the owner of the home. A notice condemning the home suddenly appeared on their door giving them until 9 a.m. Wednesday to get out.”

“Evans says, ‘It’s pretty frustrating. I thought I was coming to Oklahoma to make a better life for ourselves and it’s turned out to be a lot worse situation.’”

“The person who actually owns that home lives in California. We’ve learned that person has at least ten other properties in Oklahoma County now facing foreclosure.”

“Over five days in April, Allegheny County Judge Michael McCarthy oversaw 138 rapid-fire mortgage conciliation conferences designed to bring lenders together with homeowners who are in over their heads. Not every homeowner leaves with a smile. Joseph Moses of Mt. Lebanon appeared before McCarthy, unemployed and $7,000 behind on mortgage payments since early 2009. HSBC Bank USA filed foreclosure proceedings that June and was demanding full payment on the $235,204 mortgage.”

“‘If your wife and you get employment (that) you can show the lender, do so — but this case has been in conciliation for several years, and I can’t just keep pushing paper,’ McCarthy told Moses, removing him from the program. ‘Good luck to you, sir.’”

“The judge later explained: ‘I can’t let people live in their homes indefinitely without paying anything.’”

“From 2000 to 2010 the supply of new housing units outpaced demand by 50 percent in the four largest metro Atlanta counties (Fulton, Gwinnett, DeKalb and Cobb). The result: In those four counties alone, more than 143,000 houses, condos, apartments and other units were vacant in 2010. That’s good news for renters and bad news for landlords and often for neighborhoods.”

“Just ask Edward Nyankori, an Atlanta man who thought he was ahead of the investment game when he purchased a few rental properties eight years ago. That belief was quickly shattered when the economy tanked.”

“‘People are not willing to pay the price I need just to break even, because there are so many other things on the market,’ he said.”

“Alma Welch, once a globe-trotting Salt Lake City Olympic booster moving among Utah’s wealthy elite, has been turned out of her posh Federal Heights mansion and is struggling to pay medical bills and survive on what little remains of a once multimillion-dollar estate. Take away the Olympic glitz and big-dollar amounts, and Welch’s experience is akin to those of thousands of Utahns who built fortunes only to see them toppled by Utah’s real estate collapse.”

“More than 15,000 residents have lost their homes since 2008 and, like Welch, they often talk of divorce, medical calamity and financial miscalculation. ‘I was at the top of the world,’ Welch said. ‘If it can happen to me, if I can end up homeless, it can happen to anybody.’”

“One of the biggest disasters in securitized mortgage history became official on Monday when the $196.3 million in mortgages for the Biscayne Landing project in North Miami were completely written off. Yes, that’s a 100 percent write-down, according to Trepp LLC. A pool of commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) granted for nearly $200 million is now valued at zero.”

“At one point, Boca Developers planned to build 6,000 homes on the 188-acre Superfund site. It completed two condo towers, which were later lost to another lender, and then went into default on the CMBS debt.”

“There are a million stories in the Naked City, and about 1,500 of them involve the doomed and domed four-story complex of five-star mondo-condos known as Chapala One. By its glitzy grand opening in 2008, construction of Chapala One cost about $35 million. It was more than two years late. And with total costs running closer to $60 million, the project managed to be upside-down and underwater at the same time.”

“The economy had tanked, and suddenly there weren’t a lot of people interested in $3.5-million penthouses. The lender initiated foreclosure proceedings. In the meantime, $6 million in bills didn’t get paid, precipitating a daisy chain of grief and pain that was left to a jury to apportion blame and responsibility. The bad juju involved in transforming a union hall for working stiffs into luxury condos for gazillionaires should now be obvious, but at the time, it was somehow overlooked.”

“In the Northeast, where residential construction starts were down 29.4 percent to 60,000, and building permits issued were down 16.7 percent, also to 60,000. Jeff Wittmann, a homebuilder in Woodbridge Township, knows how bleak the market has been. For the past two years, he has held onto on a quarter-acre parcel in Woodbridge Township, waiting for the right buyer to come. He is offering to sell the lot itself for $199,000, or the four-bedroom colonial home and two-car garage he envisions there for $499,000. He has already lowered the asking price from $529,000.”

“‘If we have a buyer, the house could be completed in five months,’ Wittmann said, who is president of the Colonia-based Kimball Builders. ‘A couple of people looked at it, but nobody for real.’”

“Las Vegas real estate broker Ken Lowman would love to sell one of his luxury listings, an 8,500-square-foot., 8 bedroom masterpiece with an amazing poolside cabana and gourmet kitchen, for its original price of $4 million. But the value of homes in the area has plummeted, forcing Lowman to put the mansion on the market for nearly half its price.”

“‘I have the home listed today for $2.35 million,’ said Lowman. ‘It’s definitely challenging to have to sell property at prices vastly reduced from just a matter of three or four years (ago). In the luxury market today, 20-25% of the sales are unfortunately foreclosures.’”

“The Obama Administration wants the government to gradually step away from the mortgage market and turn it over to the private sector. As a part of its plan, the temporary loan limit increase for expensive homes, also known as ‘jumbos,’ will expire after September 31 and will drop from $729,750 to $625,500. States with expensive home markets could be drastically affected by the move, which would mean larger down payments for higher-end homes.”

“‘We strongly oppose a reduction in loan limits because it means financing would become even more difficult,’ said Walt Molony, a senior public affairs specialist for the National Association of Realtors. ‘If more expensive loans were entirely dependent on private financing, you could see a real crisis in areas like California when capital disappears.’”

“The Warren Group reported Tuesday that 518 foreclosures were completed last month, a 62 percent decline from April 2010 levels. But the number of foreclosure petitions filed last month represented the highest number of petitions filed in any month in Massachusetts since last September. Warren Group CEO Tim Warren said he would not be surprised to see monthly petitions exceeding last year’s levels by the end of the year – based on the number of foreclosures that were initiated in April.”

“‘I was optimistic about the real estate market in the latter part of last year, and those improvements just haven’t materialized,’ Warren said. ‘I think foreclosures are going to be with us for quite a while longer. I’m just not too optimistic that it’s going to slide down a slippery slope to a perfect solution.’”

“Weld County has seen one of the sharpest increases in overall housing vacancy rates over the past decade, a 135 percent increase, trailing only Garfield County’s 166 percent and Arapahoe’s 141 percent. ‘I think there are some properties kind of frozen in the marketplace because banks are not turning them over and that’s creating demand in other areas,’ said Becky Safarik, Greeley community development director.”

“In Baldwin County, the population increased by nearly 30 percent, new census data revealed. The housing also proliferated, until the number of housing units had swollen by 40 percent to a total of 104,000. But more than 13 percent of those units, excluding seasonal or vacation homes, were vacant in 2010, according to the census.”

“Anthony Kaiser, chief operating officer for Century 21/Meyer Real Estate, said that in the early part of the decade, Baldwin County saw a tremendous surge in new housing, including builders taking over swaths of land for development. ‘As a result, when the economy went down, due to the recession and the hurricanes, … then we began to see where all those subdivisions began to be empty and began to go into foreclosures,’ Kaiser said.”

“A majority of Americans do not expect the housing market to recover before 2014, according to a new survey that shows growing numbers expect a longer wait for market conditions to return to pre-recession levels. The many foreclosed and to-be foreclosed homes are another major factor delaying a housing recovery, said RealtyTrac Senior VP Rick Sharga. These factors are mirrored within the Inland Empire, where the post-2007 housing crash has been particularly profound.”

“Trulia and RealtyTrac’s data show Americans expect, on average, to pay 38 percent less for a foreclosure than a comparable property. What’s more, the U.S. has enough bank-owned properties to last two years. Even though the pace of foreclosures has slowed, banks are repossessing homes faster than buyers can pick them up, Sharga said.”

“Banks spend more than 400 days processing a foreclosure in California, Sharga said. ‘We’re not expecting a bump from the bottom. We’re expecting prices to flatten for a couple years,’ he said.”

“Owning a home was a huge part of the American Dream, and it was dutifully drummed into my head as long as I can remember. Only people who wanted to be poor threw money away on rent, I was told, over and over. I’ve yet to own a home and have no plans to do so even though median prices have fallen more than 60 percent. It raises the question of whether that thinking is wrong or just a reflection of the different society we live in today compared with that of our grandparents and parents.”

“Look, it’s not wrong. Not at all. And don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.”

“For someone who has moved around quite frequently, locking myself long-term to a piece of property simply didn’t make sense. Moving to Las Vegas from Los Angeles in early 2005, lifestyle came into the equation as well. I wanted a piece of the Strip, and the only way to achieve that was to rent. For less than $900 a month, I was able to rent a 750-square-foot unit at the Meridian. I had a third-floor unit with a balcony overlooking the Strip north of Flamingo Road. That was until Meridian was bought out in the condo conversion craze shortly after I moved in, and the developer offered units for sale to tenants.”

“When someone wants to know if you’ll pay $385,000 for a one-bedroom unit that’s built as an apartment when new homes are selling for a median price of less than $300,000, what are they smoking? I decided in 2007 to rent a town house rather than purchase at Meridian. That unit I could have bought is now worth less than $100,000.”

“It was that 20th-Century, American-Dream thinking that prompted many Las Vegans to buy even during the boom. After the median price shot up 68 percent from $164,000 in 2003 to $275,000 in 2005, many plunged into buying. The price peaked in 2006 before it fell. A lot of those people are underwater—they owe more on their mortgages than the homes are worth. I’m sure a lot of those folks now wish they’d rented.”

“Just because renting is a viable option, it doesn’t mean the dream of homeownership has died forever. I may still purchase a home one day, but sometimes dreams don’t follow one path and instead have alternatives, especially if I choose bachelor, high-rise living. For now.”




RSS feed

42 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-05-20 06:14:32

This was a fun week. My thanks to everyone who supports this blog. Please check back this weekend for news, your topics and market observations.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 06:39:29

“Take away the Olympic glitz and big-dollar amounts, and Welch’s experience is akin to those of thousands of Utahns who built fortunes only to see them toppled by Utah’s real estate collapse.”

Sounds to me like she built herself a fortune in mortgage debt. But the article really doesn’t explain that, does it?

But for the sake of argument, had she built a fortune free and clear of anything owed to the bank, then she could sell part of said fortune and live off the proceeds, right?

Comment by CincyDad
2011-05-20 10:23:36

‘I was at the top of the world,’ Welch said. ‘If it can happen to me, if I can end up homeless, it can happen to anybody.’”

This is the line that had me screaming at my pc. Her claim of being “at the top of the world” must have been, as PB said, the “top of the debt world”.

Comment by snake charmer
2011-05-20 13:47:51

It gets worse. From the article:

“It will be an awful sight to see me as a bag lady,” she said. “I shop at the dollar store now. It’s a far cry from the Chanel store on the Champs-Elysees in Paris.”

She sounds like just another bubble-era arriviste.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-20 14:33:44

This Utah bag lady article is the gift that just keeps on giving. Here’s another fun passage:

The [marital] breakup brought Alma Welch a settlement estimated at $2.2 million. In 1998, records show, she bought a 4,400-square-foot home for at least $679,300 on South Temple in Salt Lake City’s historic and upscale Federal Heights.

“It was my city home,” Alma Welch said. “Remodeling it became my therapy.”

Through a trust set up in her name, property records show, Welch also secured an adjustable interest rate line of home-equity credit worth at least $400,000 from Zions Bank.

She concedes she was naive about money and ill-prepared to manage the loan but maintains bank officials should have known better.

To which I say:

You know that old expression about a fool and his/her money being soon parted? Here’s a classic case in point.

Lady could have borrowed library books on managing one’s life after a divorce. Or, what the heck, she could have sprung for a few sessions at Divorce Recovery.

But no. She had to go on a remodeling therapy binge.

Yeesh.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SaladSD
2011-05-20 19:36:08

A Real Housewife of Utah. Man, I hate those shows…the women are cookie-cutter aliens with too much spare time, glycolic peels and silicone. As I age I’m putting my freak on and going au naturale.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 06:41:25

“$196.3 million in mortgages for the Biscayne Landing project in North Miami were completely written off. Yes, that’s a 100 percent write-down, according to Trepp LLC. A pool of commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) granted for nearly $200 million is now valued at zero. At one point, Boca Developers planned to build 6,000 homes on the 188-acre Superfund site.

That story takes the toxic mortgage concept to a new level.

Comment by Jerry
2011-05-20 10:50:56

Does this mean the Christmas party is canceled?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 06:43:44

“The bad juju involved in transforming a union hall for working stiffs into luxury condos for gazillionaires should now be obvious, but at the time, it was somehow overlooked.”

Too funny, yet tragically emblematic of bubble excesses!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 06:45:16

Dumb question of the day:

Has the Fed ever once owned up to the role of their easy money lending policies on creating the sea of real estate malinvestment and toxic mortgage debt in which we swim? Or was all of this an act of God?

Comment by Steve J
2011-05-20 09:34:52

I think Greenspan finally owned up to it a few years back.

 
 
Comment by rms
2011-05-20 06:47:24

From the Utah piece: “Who sells a 47-year-old woman who’s never had a job, with five kids in the nest, a $400,000 loan?” Welch asked. “That never should have happened.”

Sure, play the victim card. Loser!

Comment by 2banana
2011-05-20 10:14:59

But - that would be red-lining! Obama says no.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-05-20 18:12:06

It’s easy to mock, but Alma is right.

30 years ago, every bank would have saved her from herself. Isn’t that how mortgages earned such a safe reputation — because thousands of banks DID saves millions of FB’s from themselves. Amazing how low risk can be when you filter out the risky folks BEFORE handing out the money.

But then in the past 10 years in pursuit of the quick buck, shoddy banks made crap loan assets, but used the homey imagery and safety record of 50-70’s era to paint the crap as 50-70’s era quality. Taking advantage. It’s an insult to my hard-working parents and grandparents. It’s also an insult (really) to the careful local bankers of that era who made money the old-fashioned way — by waiting 7-30 years for it.

This is why I think those banks should eat it more than the FB’s. While some FB’s did know it was a crock, many more were just trying to be like dad and grandpa. But those banks knew, full well.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-20 19:59:22

While some FB’s did know it was a crock, many more were just trying to be like dad and grandpa. But those banks knew, full well.

I think so too. (ITST)

Comment by VegasBob
2011-05-20 22:19:45

Of course the banks knew what was going on. But the banksters were in it for the fees. The fees could be as much as 15K on a 300K mortgage. Who’s not going to scoop up all that easy loot?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 06:47:40

“‘We strongly oppose a reduction in loan limits because it means financing would become even more difficult,’ said Walt Molony, a senior public affairs specialist for the National Association of Realtors. ‘If more expensive loans were entirely dependent on private financing, you could see a real crisis in areas like California when capital disappears.’”

So in other words, it is up to working stiffs in the U.S. Heartland to funnel in massive infusions of federal tax dollars to keep wealthy Californians comfortably housed in homes a Midwesterner could never possibly afford?

Comment by CincyDad
2011-05-20 10:29:11

Midwesterners* are too sensible to ever pay those house prices. I can get 10x the house at 1/3 the price. And my salary would not be much higher in CA.

* the sensless midwesterners move to CA looking for ’something for nothing’ because they aren’t practical enough to achieve in the MW.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-20 06:58:35

There is an simple solution: LOWER YOUR PRICE

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-05-20 07:33:41

“The person who actually owns that home lives in California. We’ve learned that person has at least ten other properties in Oklahoma County now facing foreclosure.”

—————————-
In 5 years, instead of Califorians wasting their money to buy multiple houses in Oklahoma (why on earth???), it will be idiot Canadians and Chinese.

Comment by The_Overdog
2011-05-20 07:35:29

…using their money to buy houses and defaulting I mean.

 
Comment by Ken Best
2011-05-20 12:17:06

How could that one Californian bought more than 10 houses ?
Can we say fraud?

Who enabled the frauds? The banks, the Fed, and Greenspan.
Greenspan did more damage to America than Bin Laden.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-05-20 18:14:51

The Chinese and Canadians are using cash. Even if they lose, they won’t go under.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-20 09:25:17

From the original post:

“The Obama Administration wants the government to gradually step away from the mortgage market and turn it over to the private sector. As a part of its plan, the temporary loan limit increase for expensive homes, also known as ‘jumbos,’ will expire after September 31 and will drop from $729,750 to $625,500. States with expensive home markets could be drastically affected by the move, which would mean larger down payments for higher-end homes.”

To which I say:

It’s still early here in Tucson, but I’m already puckering up. Why? Because I want to give the Obama Administration a big smooch, that’s why.

 
Comment by 2banana
2011-05-20 10:08:43

“The Obama Administration wants the government to gradually step away from the mortgage market and turn it over to the private sector. As a part of its plan, the temporary loan limit increase for expensive homes, also known as ‘jumbos,’ will expire after September 31 and will drop from $729,750 to $625,500. States with expensive home markets could be drastically affected by the move, which would mean larger down payments for higher-end homes.”

Wait until 1 OCT to start looking at these homes…

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2011-05-20 11:18:57

Dang I was looking for the “Like” button and realised I wasn’t on that big social network that will remain nameless. ;)

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-05-20 12:36:24

And $625,000 is STILL pretty far above the $417,000 limit that F&F would be willing to buy without special, temporary authority.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-05-20 10:12:10

“Owning a home was a huge part of the American Dream, and it was dutifully drummed into my head as long as I can remember. Only people who wanted to be poor threw money away on rent, I was told, over and over.

Owning a home with 20% down, 2.5x your income and a stable job was a huge part of the American dream…

$7.50/hour strawberry pickers owning $750,000 houses - not so much.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2011-05-20 11:18:03

Yep. Don’t forget the 15-20 year mortgage terms, max.

There was a time when the American Dream included paying off the entire mortgage before the kids were grown, which would help free up cash to pay the college bills.

 
Comment by Ken Best
2011-05-20 12:12:55

But the late night infomercials told us that RE is the way to get rich with no money down, and using other people money.

The realtors told us that RE always goes up. Watts said 6% is in the bag.

There were a lot of frauds in the RE business.

Comment by toast on the coast 90803
2011-05-20 18:08:43

I remember attending a Gary Watts seminar and he stated prices would never go down in the OC because we are “rich”.
Agents in my office would bring their clients to the seminars to persuade them to buy. I’m sure they have lost the homes by now.

Comment by snake charmer
2011-05-20 20:59:03

I would have loved to sneak into one of those seminars, just to see firsthand the mindset of the attendees. I’d have to stay undercover though. In a similar setting, I know someone who worked at a Scientology holiday party here and he noticed after awhile that he had been assigned a “minder” who followed him around.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2011-05-21 10:33:21

And without the “stable job” part of that equation, even 20% down and 2.5x income sounds pretty risky.

My American dream is to keep renting and saving until I can afford to put at least 50% down and borrow no more than 2x income. Should be there in another 2-3 years, and less if prices keep dropping.

 
 
Comment by JoJo
2011-05-20 11:57:17

““‘People are not willing to pay the price I need just to break even, because there are so many other things on the market,’ he said.””

People don’t want to overpay rent to cover his overpriced mortgage! What an outrage!

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-20 12:10:40

Yeah, what a bunch of mean renters! The nerve of those people!

 
 
Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-05-20 14:58:18

Janet Jackson had a posh Las Vegas loft for sale a few months ago. Her or Latoya. Would be a kick to get that at half of what she asked. Think it was 2,000 square feet.

Comment by oxide
2011-05-20 18:16:33

Pretty sure it was LaToya. Janet was the only sensible one in the entire litter.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 21:06:17

“Tom and Alma Welch made headlines worldwide three years later, when Tom, then the chief 2002 Winter Games organizer, was charged with misdemeanor battery and pleaded no contest to assaulting Alma during a July 9, 1997, argument in the garage of their Salt Lake City home. He resigned as president of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, the job Mitt Romney eventually took over after a 1999 bribery scandal shook up the SLOC leadership.

The couple split after Tom Welch was accused of corruption amid reports that some International Olympic Committee members received lavish treatment from Salt Lake City and other cities bidding for the right to stage the 2002 Winter Games.

The IOC expelled some members for taking money and excessive gifts from the Salt Lake Bid Committee.”

This story is starting to come back now, especially the part about how the 2002 SLC Winter Olympics almost went up in the flames of a financial scandal before Mitt Romney stepped in and rescued the situation. This was a key stepping stone in Mitt’s rise to political prominence.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-05-20 21:55:13

It is key, because it seems to be the one hard thing that he did right and nobody argues with. If anybody ever proves that reality wasn’t that flattering to him on that task, he’ll have nothing left to point to. Personally, I think his involvement in health care in MA is kinda cool, but now he gets no points for it since he is apparently ashamed to be associated with it.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 22:05:48

“It is key, because it seems to be the one hard thing that he did right and nobody argues with.”

He managed to serve as Republican governor in one of the most liberal Democratic states, appearing to be able to lead from a sufficiently centrist stance to satisfy the voters.

But rather than tout his centrist cred, he tried to position himself far to the right of Obama in the 2008 election, probably to lay claim to the so-called Republican base, which is far to the right of Obama. This was a spectacular political folly, as Mitt needs votes more than he needs campaign contributions, and his political career may never recover from being positioned far to the right of a centrist president.

Comment by VegasBob
2011-05-20 22:22:52

Are you calling Obama centrist? Surely you jest! He is serving Bush’s 3rd term.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-20 21:09:17

“Who sells a 47-year-old woman who’s never had a job, with five kids in the nest, a $400,000 loan?” Welch asked. “That never should have happened.”

Wouldn’t denying her the loan have been considered gender discrimination?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post