May 25, 2011

Bits Bucket for May 25, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

227 Comments »

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 04:16:55

Realtors Are Liars

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-05-25 04:33:55

Realtors Solicit Prostitutes.

Randy Realtor Charged With Unlawful Entry

by ARLnow.com | 104 views | March 18, 2011 at 9:13 am

A real estate agent has been arrested after Arlington County police say he solicited the services of a prostitute inside a vacant, for-sale home.

Springfield, Va. resident Dennis Mahafkey, 55, was charged with unlawful entry and solicitation of prostitution after being apprehended on the 3700 block of South 2nd Street on Friday, March 11. Cops say they were tipped off when someone called to report a suspicious vehicle next to the home.

“Police were alerted when people saw a car in the driveway that did not belong there,” said police spokeswoman Det. Crystal Nosal.

Nosal said that Mahafkey was not the “listing agent” on the home, but had access via a key box on the door.

Mahafkey has 24 years of real estate experience and is noted for his “award winning service,” according to a profile on the Coldwell Banker web site. He was held on a $5,000 bond.

http://www.arlnow.com/2011/03/18/randy-realtor-charged-with-unlawful-entry/ - 82k -

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 04:38:57

Yep. Realtors are “professionals” according to Crime Syndicate NAR. uh huh.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-05-25 05:36:54

Is a Realtor a house Pimp? Went to Wikipedia.
I am going to change the word Pimp to Realtor and the word prostitute to buyer or seller and see how it reads.

Pimp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Realtor is an agent for house sellers who collects a portion of their earnings.

Business of pimping

Realtors sometimes operate like a business.[7] The Realtors may have a bottom girl who serves as office manager, keeping the Realtor apprised of law-enforcement activity and collecting money from the sellers.[8] Realtors recognize a hierarchy among themselves. The least respected, or newer Realtors, are the “popcorn Realtors” and “wannabes”. A Realtor who uses violence and intimidation to control his buyers is called a “Jonas Realtor “, while those who use psychological trickery to deceive younger buyers into becoming hooked into the system are called “finesse Realtors”. An important part of the business is obtaining and maintaining a selection of buyers. Losing one’s buyer to another Realtor is known as being “peeled”. Informing a Realtor that one of his buyers has switched Realtors is a professional courtesy, and any attempt to respond to this courtesy with violence will quickly get the violent Realtor labeled a “Gorilla” or “Godzilla”. Buyers who move between Realtors often are labeled as a “Choosey Susie”. In addition, a buyer may “bounce” from Realtor to Realtor without paying the “Realtor moving” tax.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pimp - 59k -

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 05:50:21

Technically, if the realtor is the pimp, then the house would be the prostitute, and the buyer would be the “john?”

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-05-25 06:19:11

I am thinking the Realtor is the Pimp, the seller or home owner is the prostitute and the buyer is the john. Leaving the sale of the house as the “act”.

Being that the homeowner has something of their own to sell (the house) like the prostitute has something of their own to sell ( ).

The buyer wants to buy something (a house) the john wants to buy ( ).

The Realtor makes a % profit on the sale of the house and the Pimp makes a % profit on the sale of ( ).

Same business model.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 06:54:40

There it is….. nicely done Jethro.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:17:24

“Randy Realtor Charged With Unlawful Entry”

Which ‘entry’ was the unlawful one?

 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-05-25 06:35:27

“Randy Realtor Charged With Unlawful Entry”

Anyone else get the pun?

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:16:31

It seemed like more of a double enterendre…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-05-25 11:09:48

Honestly, I don’t know why getting cash for “your services” is illegal. Many of us sold it for a night on the town in our youth. The cash is a better business deal. I’m just saying.
And this guy has been paid reasonably handsome for his services (screwing people), so it is actually nice to see him paying for it.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-05-25 11:29:47

Realtors are layers.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-05-25 14:08:52

“Realtors are layers.”

LMAO

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bad Chile
2011-05-25 05:15:26

Everyone bring their towel with them today?

Comment by Steve W
2011-05-25 06:57:27

Why, are the Vogons coming?

Comment by Bad Chile
2011-05-25 07:33:49

May 25: Towel Day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:32:46

It’s also National Planking Day.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:00:34

Vogons? Does this mean the hyper-bypass is coming through?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 12:01:53

Nope, they’re having trouble selling the bonds with a low interest rate.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 13:47:56

:lol: Where’s a good Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster when you need one?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 04:43:01

Troubled Banks Grow in First Quarter: FDIC
By: AP

The number of banks at risk of failing made up nearly 12 percent of all federally insured banks in the first three months of 2011, the highest level in 18 years.

That proportion is about the same as in the October-December quarter last year, though the increase in the number of banks on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s confidential “problem” list is slowing. The FDIC added only four banks to its list in the January-March quarter.

That brought the total to 888 from 884. Banks on the list are deemed by examiners to have very low capital cushions against risk.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 11:44:32

A couple of years back, Weiss Research released a white paper called “Dangerous Unintended Consequences.” Among other things, it suggested that the number of problem banks could be as high as 1,500. Looks like Weiss will be proven right — in time.

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-05-25 17:32:36

I had heard a couple of years ago that half of the banks would fail (this was immediately pre-Lehman…I think the day before, or the day of, in fact).

I think we will have fewer bank failures over the next few years, but not because things are getting better. More and more of the banks will simply be the walking dead (not lending, but not failing either). The FDIC simply doesn’t have the money to shut down banks in any great number, and there is no political will to give the FDIC any more money for the shutting down of banks.

The FDIC before the mess began had $50B. Last I checked, they had about $10B, but contingent liabilities (cost of shutting down the worst offending banks) of $18B.

I have also heard some anecdotes of people getting laid off from the FDIC (they originally went to the FDIC to assist in shutting down banks…less work=no job).

The great muddle through continues.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:18:55

U.S. housing crisis not over yet
Home ownership may dip before long-term improvement settles in
By: The Economist
Posted: 05/24/2011 1:00 AM

WASHINGTON — At the ripe old age of five years, America’s housing bust is still very much alive and kicking. House prices dropped 3.3 per cent in the year to February according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index, the fastest decline since November 2009. The Federal Reserve’s preferred measure, the CoreLogic house-price index, showed an even worse one-year decline of 7.5 per cent in March. And Zillow, an online real estate database, recently said that prices fell 8.2 per cent in the year to March. Zillow has reported falling prices for 57 consecutive months.

The latest housing hiccup has Americans worried that a new phase of the crash is under way. Two years ago, housing appeared to hit bottom. Prices and sales leveled off thanks to low interest rates and a generous housing tax credit. But that respite ended last summer. The tax credit expired just as a broader economic chill descended, and price declines resumed. Some forecasters expect another five per cent to 10 per cent fall in prices before the market rights itself. Robert Shiller, of Case-Shiller index and irrational exuberance fame, thinks a further 25 per cent decline is not out of the question.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 06:36:12

No one seems to want to talk about the 800 lb gorilla in the living room: employment.

And not just unemployment percentages but average and median wages, raises, etc.

They want us to spend, spend, spend. My nominal wages have been stagnant for 10 years (thank you India) so my purchasing power has taken a real hit. 10+ years ago I could afford new cars every 3 years (I leased), to periodically take the family out to dinner, to take vacations, etc. That’s history now, unless I get myself into debt.

I finally have an employer who values my contributions and gives me annual raises, so hopefully the slide will stop, or at least level off. I can’t even begin to fathom how the under $500 a week crowd survives. Out here apartment rents start in the $700-800 range and small houses are even more.

It’s one thing if you are single and have roommates, but for those that have fallen off the middle class bus and have families it’s the shame of foodstamps, and knowing that they have permanently joined the underclass.

And they wonder why houses aren’t selling?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 09:50:28

So you’re suggesting if unemployment falls to __%, housing becomes more affordable?

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 10:50:49

It depends on the wages. If wages are good, then buyers will slowly come back. If we remain the $8/hr nation, then no.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-05-25 11:35:59

Don’t worry, they’re already trying to figure out how to get mortgage rates to .5% should we become $8/hr Nation. Can’t. let. housing. prices. fall. further.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 11:40:14

Then you mean wages, not unemployment.

This idea that housing prices will magically reverse course from their plunge when unemployment falls is BS.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 12:00:47

“Should we we become $8/hr Nation”

Half the workforce makes less than $500/week. I think we’re already there.

 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:09:54

No one seems to want to talk about the 800 lb gorilla in the living room: employment.

Of course not. Somebody might finally realize that the Repubs successfully voted against ending tax breaks for sending jobs offshore.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:11:18

I finally have an employer who values my contributions and gives me annual raises

You do know that compared to most people, you’ve won lottery with this, right?

Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 10:35:16

The disturbing is part is that we’re comparing getting a god job to winning the lottery.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 11:47:28

Exactly Oxy.

We’re so lucky to be slaves!

What’s more disturbing TV like “undercover boss”. 30 years ago the public would want to see the “undercover boss” hung from a lightpole. Not anymore. The public declares, “what a nice guy that CEO is!”.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 10:54:10

“You do know that compared to most people, you’ve won lottery with this, right?”

That sad thing is that this wasn’t unusual about 10+ years ago.

And yes, having an employer who notices the 999 things you did right instead of focusing on the one you messed up on (and uses it as an excuse for no raise) does feel like winning the lottery.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 11:49:34

And yes, having an employer who notices the 999 things you did right instead of focusing on the one you messed up on (and uses it as an excuse for no raise) does feel like winning the lottery.

Reason #1 why I left the employment world. I got tired of the nitpicking.

 
 
 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-05-25 06:40:02

Five years. Let that sink in. Something “the economists” said would last only six months has now lasted five years.

Comment by CrackerBob
2011-05-25 06:47:44

Reminds me of a certain “Arabian Adventure”.

Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 07:38:37

Or that police action in south east Asia.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-05-25 08:04:34

By “Arabian Adventure” I presume you mean the Iraq War. That adventure has turned out to be so successful that even The One is standing up to take some of the credit.

Is the Arab Spring looking to emulate a repressive theocracy (Iran) or a messy and still occasionally bloody democracy (Iraq)?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:35:53

My money is on theocracy.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 09:33:23

…..the Iraq War. That adventure has turned out to be so successful that even The One is standing up to take some of the credit.

How was it successful? And was it successful compared to the money and lives spent on both sides? Please make the case. I want it to be “successful”.

 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-05-25 10:56:12

Dont worry, their oil is going to pay for the war, like Bush told us.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 11:36:49

It was a success because Saddam can no longer launch is nuclear or anthrax missiles at the US.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 11:51:08

It was a success because Saddam can no longer launch is nuclear or anthrax missiles at the US.

Back during the Iran-Iraq War, guess who we supported.

Hint: His first name begins with “s” and ends with “m”. And it has six letters.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 11:58:11

It was a success because Saddam can no longer launch is nuclear or anthrax missiles at the US.

I heard that they took out the phaser banks and photon torpedo launchers in his starships too.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 12:04:50

“That adventure has turned out to be so successful that even The One is standing up to take some of the credit.”

That’s a doozy right there. 600,000 dead human beings is a success to you huh? You’re more twisted than I ever imagined.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 13:51:20

+1 Steve.

Maybe they’ll turn up one of these. Hey, we finally found bin Laden didn’t we?

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 07:58:46

Something “the economists” said would last only six months has now lasted five years.

And there’s still no light at the end of the tunnel. How can there be? We’re still offshoring like crazy, foodstamp enrollment is skyrocketing, etc.

Even if we were to change policies now (and I’m not holding my breath for that) it would take years, if not decades, to undo the damage from the past 40+ years.

And the scary thing is that pretty much the whole world has their wagons hitched to the North American and European consumer horses, which are a couple of broken down old nags. If we don’t buy their crap then they crash.

Ain’t Globalism wonderful?

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-05-25 08:23:46

Which is probably why our debtors/suppliers should be more uneasy than they are letting on so far.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 11:48:26

At the ripe old age of five years, America’s housing bust is still very much alive and kicking.

Five years? I’d say it’s more like six years old. Data points:

1. I can recall seeing a national TV news story about the housing slowdown back during the fall of 2005. I think it was on ABC News.

2. During the summer of 2005, our local fishwrap reported that local appraisers were no longer agreeing with the inflated valuations on Tucson area homes. Which meant that sellers would have to drop their prices or buyers would have to come up with more money. Long story short: A lot of deals were falling through. Wish I could find a link, because this was a real game-changer around here. Before that, the local fishwrap had been quite the real estate cheerleader.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:21:42

Outlook for S&P 500 and Economic Growth Cut: CNBC Survey
Published: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 | 9:48 AM ET
By: Steve Liesman
Senior Economics Reporter

The Federal Reserve will execute a gentle, staged exit strategy that won’t begin until the end of this year at the earliest and will put the Fed Funds rate just 50 basis points higher 13 months from now, according to the latest CNBC Fed Survey.

The 62 participants in the survey actually lowered their outlook for the Funds rate in June 2012 to an average of 75 basis points, down from 90 basis points in the April survey.

Even in December 2012, the Funds rate only rises to an average of 1.37 percent, compared with 1.67 percent in the April survey.

Respondents, who include economists, fund managers and strategists, also cut their outlook for growth and the level of the S&P 500. They now see growth of just 2.77 percent this year, compared with a 3.07 percent forecast in April. The S&P is seen hitting 1367 in December, about 2.7 percent lower than the prior forecast.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 06:37:44

Sure, and the check is in the mail.

Comment by albuquerquedan
2011-05-25 06:54:41

Low interest rates without another QE? I guess they also say we really can cut deficits without cutting entitlements or raising taxes on the wealthy. Time to fire up the printing press. They seem to admit that the only plan is to inflate our way out of debt.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 10:02:29

“They seem to admit that the only plan is to inflate our way out of debt.”

What else is there, other than defaulting?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 11:20:38

Well I suppose you make sure that low-skill jobs pay enough for Americans to do, bring back all those offshored jobs, let the housing market crash and allow FB’s to declare BK so they can rent and then buy a smaller house and a better price, institute single-payer health care, even out the tax code, and dust off the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:26:20

Did somebody give journalists the world over stupid pills? Yesterday I pointed out repeatedly here and elsewhere that the U.S. new home sales figure released was down 23.1% year-on-year (April 2010-April 2011). Yet this and every other news story I have seen reports it as an “increase.” Don’t home sales typically increase each spring from March to April “to the highest level this year”?

Go figure…

US stocks fall despite positive housing news
May 25, 2011 - 6:42AM

US stocks fell, with benchmark indexes falling to one-month lows, as a drop in automobile and other industrial companies offset a report showing that sales of new homes rose to the highest level this year.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 06:39:01

Do they teach “Spin doctoring 101″ in journalism schools these days?

 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 07:52:59

This is exactly the problem.
The press has consolidated and been taken over by the elite. No more investigative journalism. No more independent reporting. It is nothing more than a tool used to influence the masses. This is again why I blame the bankers and the elite. They created the spin, they roled back the laws, and they profited.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:15:33

Got “spin?”

World wide MSM is controlled by a relatively small number of groups.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2011-05-25 21:01:46

And really had it not been for the cheer-leading of the MSM during the Boom ,I doubt the Mania would of gain the traction it did .

Every commercial on TV was a loan ad,or a home improvement
ad ,or a positive rah rah report on housing , Interviews with flippers who had made a killing or shows about them .

It was really odd ,if you think about it ,like the whole World revolved around real estate , Articles designed to make people feel foolish if they didn’t get in on the bandwagon .

I am convinced that people can be brainwashed on a mass level .Who were the advertisers ,who owned the press ? It was rare to get any counter data on a positive take on real estate always goes up . The Experts were in la la land .

This blog was actually one of the few places that was calling the shot on the insanity of it all .

Actually its scary when you think about how mass marketing or brain washing can be this powerful ,combined with suppression of information .
You don’t really think all these Americans made these gross errors without being helped by a little help from the Mad-hatters at the Top ,and their agents ,along with a whole lot of fraud and deception .

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:33:54

I question the “cushion to families in no-recourse states” comment in the following piece: If a family has been paying the mortgage for years, then suddenly can no longer afford to do so, then won’t they potentially lose a large share of their (supposed) life savings when the bank eventually takes back the home?

What am I missing here?

Construction Forecasts
News & Analysis
U.S. new and existing home sales move in opposite directions in April
05/24/2011 by Alex Carrick, RCD Chief Economist

Some aspects of the U.S. housing market will be the subject of serious academic study in the years ahead. For example, what role has “no recourse” played in destabilizing the market? This is the practice whereby, in many states, lenders are not allowed to go after delinquent mortgage payers for the difference between the selling price of the house and the outstanding loan amount.

Typically, no-recourse loans (since they are riskier) are granted only for lower loan-to-value ratios, such as 50% to 60%. They are big in commercial markets. In residential markets, they almost always appear only in first mortgages, not seconds. Nevertheless, the out-sized drop in home prices (-33% nation-wide) has brought them attention in the latest housing market cycle.

There has been some correspondence between large price adjustments and “non-recourse” states. Some of the latter with “no recourse” are Arizona, California, Washington D.C., Washington State, Oregon, New Hampshire, Nevada and Texas (only to some degree for the latter two).

One must acquire legal expertise in these matters, depending on where one lives. “Anti-deficiency statutes” in some states determine the degree to which lenders do or do not have “recourse” against borrowers. Another factor also plays a role in determining the financial commitment of the homeowner - whether or not the state requires judicial foreclosure (i.e., court action) or non-judicial (only requiring public notices that follow legislated guidelines.)

“No recourse” may have played a significant role in setting the stage for the housing market collapse. Since it limits liability, it promotes bidding wars, leading to speculative price bubbles.

While it is hard on lenders, it does provide a cushion to many individuals and families. In “no recourse” states, it can sometimes be clearly to the homeowner’s advantage to mail in the keys if they are not able to make the monthly payments. Such actions are labeled “strategic defaults.”

There can be huge savings in monthly payments. Furthermore, administrative detail and a reluctance to take action have left some delinquent homeowners in their houses an extra eight months. This may be a partial explanation for how U.S. retail trade has come back so quickly.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 11:52:34

While it is hard on lenders, it does provide a cushion to many individuals and families. In “no recourse” states, it can sometimes be clearly to the homeowner’s advantage to mail in the keys if they are not able to make the monthly payments. Such actions are labeled “strategic defaults.”

Here in AZ, there’s a whole lotta strategic defaultin’ goin’ on.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:39:29

Reading about these killer twisters makes me wonder why more Midwestern folks don’t build so-called “safe rooms,” which can withstand winds up to 250 mph (higher than the Joplin tornado generated). What is stopping them if the technology is there (plus a 75% subsidy from FEMA)?

U.S. NEWS
MAY 25, 2011, 8:27 A.M. ET

Storms Kill at Least 13 More

Storms that moved through the central U.S. late Tuesday and early Wednesday left at least 13 people dead in Oklahoma, Arkansas and Kansas.

Oklahoma Medical Examiner’s Office spokeswoman Cherokee Ballard on Wednesday said at least five people, including a young child, died in the Oklahoma City metropolitan area. She didn’t have further details.

At least three people died as the storms hit Franklin and Johnson counties in Arkansas, state Department of Emergency Management spokesman Tommy Jackson said. One person died after a tornado swept through the tiny western Arkansas community of Denning early Wednesday. Another person died in an area called Bethlehem, in Johnson County.

A number of people were injured in Franklin and Johnson counties, though officials weren’t sure exactly how many. A rural fire station in Franklin County was left without a roof as emergency workers rushed to the wounded. Downed trees and power lines tossed across roadways also slowed search-and-rescue crews’ efforts.

In Kansas, police said two people died when high winds threw a tree into their van around 6 p.m. near the town of St. John, about 100 miles west of Wichita. The highway was shut down because of storm damage.

The storms followed Sunday’s tornado that killed at least 122 people in Joplin, Mo. On Tuesday, teams of firefighters, police officers, search dogs and volunteers fanned out across Joplin, picking their way through flattened homes, churches, schools and other buildings in search of hundreds of missing people.

More
Seven Bodies Recovered at a Home Depot
Riding With the Rescue Team
Twister Season Proves Deadliest Since 1953
Harrowing Scene at Joplin Hospital
Coroner: ‘We Are Getting More Bodies’

Comment by whyoung
2011-05-25 07:01:17

“makes me wonder why more Midwestern folks don’t build so-called “safe rooms”

If all you can afford is a trailer, a “safe room” is probably a luxury.

And like a fallout shelter, it would only be useful if you are nearby and have enough warning to take cover.

 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 07:56:40

ON NPR they said the cost is about 5,000. The chances of getting hit even in tornado alley are about 1 in 2-3000. My guess is most of those killed were at the store or on their way to work or at work.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:23:04

Say the chances of getting hit are 1/3000 and the cost is $5000; then a risk-neutral homeowner benefits by the amount of

E(benefit) = V/3000 - $5000, where V = value of protection in the event of a twister.

This expected benefit is positive provided that

V > 3000*$5000 = $1.5 million.

I suppose most people would rather part with $1.5 million than face a tornado without protection, no?

Comment by measton
2011-05-25 08:31:22

I guess I’d add that the odds of dieing in a twister even without a safe room are much lower than actually getting hit by a twister. So I suspect the cost per life saved might be very high.

I assume you could build a cheaper safe room though. 5000 seems high to me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:57:50

Don’t know if the $5000 considers FEMA’s offer of a 75% subsidy, either. Yesterday I posted a link to their web site, which provides guidance for how to build a “safe room” that can withstand winds up to 250 mph. If you are unlucky enough to face winds more extreme than that in your lifetime, then I would say that God is out to get you…

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:23:55

5K is cheap. (a safe room is generally a room of 4-6″ thick re-enforced concrete walls and roof with ventilation and batteries for lights)

And yes, this is beyond most people’s budget.

 
Comment by polly
2011-05-25 10:24:17

Is God out to get you if you build a safe room and you aren’t near it when the tornado crosses your path?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 11:55:14

Matthew 5:45

“He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.”

He sounds pretty equal opportunity to me.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 12:01:05

“He sounds pretty equal opportunity to me.”

Mark Twain would have agreed with you. His later works highlight the arbitrariness of God’s choices of whom to rapture.

 
 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-05-25 11:15:15

2 things -
Per this,
http://www.worlddisaster.info/what-are-the-odds-of-having-your-home-destroyed-in-a-tornado/

You have a 1 percent chance of your house being struck in a 50-year period
Chance of house being hit by tornado, 1 in 150,000.

The chances of dieing are even lower, so let’s consider this using your values.

#2, I think your expected value calcuation is wrong. EV is the value of the loss (which is not considered in your case) vs the value of a win with the probabilites of each.

The loss is the cost of the bunker if your house is not destroyed in 50 years. -$5000 with the probability 2999/3000. Actually, it’s more than that, but let’s not consider opportunity costs. That number equals $-4998.

Your house/life whatever would be X/(1/3000). Call it .0003.

So, for the bunker to be economically worth $5000, then

EV(loss) -$4998 + EV(win) [X/.0003] = $5000. If I’m calculating correctly, then X = $30million dollars.

Of course, this is a 50 year calculation. The present value would be less than $30mm, so let’s call it $10-20mm.
So your home and possessions would need to be worth about $10mm to make the purchase of a shelter neutral over 50 years.

This is in-line with tornado insurance being about $50 a year extra.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2011-05-25 14:52:46

Overdog,

Your house and possessions aren’t protected from loss by having a safe room. Your life and the lives of whoever is with you are protected. At least they would be if you are at home when the tornado comes, are warned in some way before it arrives and have time to get to the safe room before it hits.

Your calculation is if making the house tornado proof cost $5000 and you assumed you weren’t home when the tornado hit.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 07:57:21

So you expect the same people who wouldn’t buy car or medical insurance unless it was mandatory are going to spend money building tornado shelters??

Next you are going to tell me that people should save money for their retirement.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:24:58

…even though they get laid off every 6 years.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 11:52:21

And wipe our their savings while they job hunt for 6-12 months.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-05-25 08:09:40

‘ Reading about these killer twisters makes me wonder why more Midwestern folks don’t build so-called “safe rooms,” ‘

How many people built bomb or fallout shelters during the cold war in the ’50’s and ’60’s?

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-05-25 08:32:57

How many Californians have safe rooms? Or is that what all those Vegas condos were supposed be?

Comment by MrBubble
2011-05-25 10:43:54

Lots of us do in the SF Bay. It’s just that it’s more of a safe word room kind of thing…

Comment by ahansen
2011-05-25 22:44:21

Tee hee.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 12:02:42

We don’t need them, as our sporadic twisters seldom exceed EF1 intensity.

 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-05-25 17:32:41

Mine is a loosely nailed up tree house in a really old oak tree. I forget what it keeps me safe from.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:46:46

Just because the spring rapture was a fraud doesn’t mean the fall rapture isn’t for real!

Stupid is as stupid believes.

Brett Arends’ ROI
May 25, 2011, 12:06 a.m. EDT
Rapture’s back on! Should I sell my home?
Commentary: Doomsday is Oct. 21, so get your finances in order
By Brett Arends, MarketWatch

BOSTON (MarketWatch) — The world is coming to an end. Again.

Harold E. Camping, the radio “Rapture” guy out in California, has told his followers that the world will end — or, at least, that all the Chosen Ones will get raised up to Heaven — on Oct. 21. (Camping gave this update after Saturday’s big letdown, his second.)

I know what you’re thinking: “What does this mean for my personal finances?”

Harold Camping, the broadcaster who predicted the world’s end on May 21, says he got it wrong — but not completely.

Well, here at MarketWatch we’ve always got your back. So if you’re getting ready for the Rapture, here are my 10 personal-finance tips.

Comment by liz pendens
2011-05-25 06:09:30

Raptures are like real estate bottoms. The next one is always the one that is the real deal.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-05-25 07:39:14

Maybe he got it right and the worthy were the quiet ones no one’s noticed missing.

Uh oh that means we’re heading into the Tribulation.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:00:49

Maybe he was right all along, but none of us were chosen?

Comment by whyoung
2011-05-25 08:08:07

how embarrassing for the minister if he wasn’t among the chosen…

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:24:54

It clearly was part of God’s plan. How could he possibly have warned his followers about the October 21, 2011 rapture if he had been chosen for the May 21, 2011 rapture?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 11:25:08

I can’t think of a better warning for an October 21 rapture, than a May 21 rapture.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 11:49:43

He could have left a video behind!

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 11:51:10

And speaking of which, does anyone recall all those “Left Behind” novels that used to be red hot on the best sellers list?

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-05-25 08:11:40

+1 :-)

Religion is creepy.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 09:49:57

Religion is creepy.

Come on. Some in religion might be creepy but religion in itself is not creepy. It is part of the human condition, part of every society in the world (which indicates a human need for it) and religion has helped people and society much more than it has ever hurt.

And yea, I know about the harm it has caused.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-05-25 11:05:56

What organization has done more harm to mankind, Catholic Church or Nazi party?

http://www.zenzoneforum.com/threads/18325-The-Roman-Catholic-church-deadly-enemy-of-mankind

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 12:37:15

What organization has done more harm to mankind, Catholic Church or Nazi party?

Adjusted for the relative time they were in existence and their per capita effect on whom were in contact with them, the Nazis.

It’s not even in the same ballpark or county that the ballpark is located in.

Also you can substitute the word “good” for “harm” in your question to help grasp the difference.

 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-05-25 17:35:07

no “adjusting.”

The Inquisitions might have killed as many…

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:14:50

Some folks in Joplin probably wonder if their neighbors were chosen.

Concord
The Concord Stormchaser witnesses more tornado destruction in Oklahoma
Posted by Your Town May 25, 2011 10:11 AM
By Chris Curtis, Guest Columnist

My name is Chris Curtis and most days I run the West Concord Five and Ten in Concord, but this weekend I headed to Oklahoma to find some tornadoes for the next two weeks. What follows is a diary of the third day of storm chasing with our group. You can click here to find my diary from Day One, where I witnessed the destruction of Joplin, and click here for Day Two.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 09:46:01

Doomsday is Oct. 21,

I’m glad they delayed it. I didn’t do my taxes yet.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 11:51:29

But if only it hadn’t been delayed, you would no longer have to prepare your taxes…

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 12:03:47

But if only it hadn’t been delayed, you would no longer have to prepare your taxes…

Uh huh because nothing is certain but death and taxes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by redrum
2011-05-25 10:04:23

Best idea I’ve heard is: to go to your local thrift store and buy several complete outfits of clothing. Late night, Thu Oct 20, or real early Oct 21, lay these outfits out on the ground in plain view to be discovered by the “believers” (at a church?). The implication being, of course, the rapture happened and they were left behind!

Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 11:40:54

Sounds like a good excuse for a man to “disappear.” The family thinks he was raptured when he really ran off with the mistress. Oh the irony…

 
Comment by lavi d
2011-05-25 12:18:36

The implication being, of course, the rapture happened and they were left behind!

I like the idea of filling inflatable, human-sized dolls with helium and letting them go.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 05:55:25

To add to yesterday’s dismal new home sales figure (the widely-misreported “increase” that was off 23.1% since April 2010):

Durable orders fall in April

U.S. orders for durable goods fall sharply, mainly because of lower demand for aircraft and automobiles, government data show. Fewer bookings for Boeing and automotive supply-chain disruptions are cited.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 06:11:45

My takeaway from this article is that labor costs in China are rising. Soon the pesky peasants will hire union goons and demand gold-plated benefits and insane pensions. I remember when all those “Made in Japan” stickers were replaced with “Made in China.” I guess those “Made in China” stickers will be replaced with “Made in mudhut for 1/9 bowl of rice in 3rd-world-nation-du-jour.”

———
Toy Prices Rise as China Wages Increase
By Bloomberg News - May 24, 2011 7:13 PM ET

Hundreds of toymakers at the China Import and Export Fair, the country’s largest, are charging more as the world’s second- largest economy battles inflation that soared to an almost three-year high of 5.4 percent in March. Mattel Inc. (MAT), which makes Barbie dolls, and Hasbro Inc. (HAS), owner of the Transformers brand, raised prices earlier this year as Chinese factories pass on higher costs for raw materials and labor.

“If you take into account everything Chinese toymakers are dealing with — labor, material, exchange rate — a price hike is only a natural consequence,” said Hua Zhongwei, a macroeconomic analyst with Huachuang Securities in Beijing. “There is a big chance for shoppers in the U.S. to face higher prices for Christmas gifts this year.”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 06:40:50

That’s what happens in the race to the bottom. There is always someone who can dive deeper than you can.

 
Comment by albuquerquedan
2011-05-25 06:41:48

No question labor is going up but China will never allow real unions. Everything is controlled by the government, while nominally communist is is truly fascist. Since we are moving in that direction we shall soon now what it is like to live under that type of system.

Comment by measton
2011-05-25 08:01:43

I’d say we are already there.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:06:01

Fascism is anti-materialism isn’t it?

I don’t see that happening here any time soon.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 08:11:17

“Fascism is anti-materialism isn’t it?”

Not so sure about that. My in laws grew up in Nazi Germany. They said that at first everyone loved Hitler because he led them into prosperity. Then he went nuts and started invading his neighbors.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:46:17

After 9/11 I don’t think Hitler would have told everyone to go out and spend money.

Nor would I see him bailing out AIG or Goldman Sachs.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 09:58:28

“After 9/11 I don’t think Hitler would have told everyone to go out and spend money.”

I think that he understood that weath is created through work. Of course, he had the German work ethic to back him up.

 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 10:47:14

Facism is not anticonsumerism it is prowealth consolidation which results in less overall consumption. It is against financial and corporate regulation which results in fraud and less investment. This is where the US is now and it will continue to get worse.

 
Comment by leosdad
2011-05-25 12:41:30

Hitler and work ethic? You must be kidding. Until he became chancellor he never held a job in his life. He was essentially a bum with a big mouth, nothing more. And a felon as well. And even in the years after 1933 he was quite lazy, history about his private life tells.

 
Comment by denquiry
2011-05-26 01:51:50

Looks like Obama and Hitler have a lot in common.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:30:25

No. Fascism is defined and a merging of government and corporations with very strong nationalism.

To argue whether the nation then leans more government or busines, is moot.

And yes, we’re there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 13:53:16

“…AS a merging…”

 
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 08:00:38

Like I said my MIL purchased clothes for the kids a few weeks ago. Pants and shirts were 2-3 bucks each at Walmart. Made in Kenya. It’s a race to the bottom that will drag us all down. The US as a whole would be better off throwing up trade barriers or increasing the costs of imported goods with a VAT tax. The elite will have nothing to do with this they want slaves and they want to continue stripping the wealth from the US.

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 09:35:33

Kenya? Must be Obama’s fault.

How’s that Hope and Change working out for you now kidz?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 12:13:26

How’s that Hope and Change working out for you now kidz?

Just swell Wally! :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 09:55:52

Made in Kenya

Your worried about USA making clothes??? Relax……. This is the beauty of free-markets.

Making shirts in Kenya frees up Americans to do the higher value jobs that can be done in India.

 
 
Comment by roger
2011-05-25 11:01:26

I found a million dollar baby (doll) in the five and ten cent store!

 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-05-25 12:39:57

oxide
I re-posted this article below, not knowing you did. I apologize. It does make me wonder if the business model for the dollar store segment is in trouble? Maybe not… the race to the bottom has hit Africa. (just thinking out loud)

Comment by ahansen
2011-05-25 22:52:16

China is simply outsourcing to its holdings in Africa now.

 
 
 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 06:13:13

Stagflation: it’s what’s for breakfast

Comment by liz pendens
2011-05-25 06:40:58

Home of the ten-dollar cell phone and the hundred-dollar fill-up.

 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 08:03:31

I don’t know things seem to be swinging down again

OJ 2 bucks a quart this week
Milk 2.22 a gallon
both on sale.
Kids clothes 2-3 bucks for shirts and pants.
Gas moving lower.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 08:08:37

The question is: was the price of milk and OJ really lower, or were they just loss leaders?

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-05-25 08:15:47

The number of items on sale had declined significantly the last few months, but my last two trips to the grocery resulted in me stocking up on a number of “specials” again.

Of course the joke will be on me if prices are indeed headed downward.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 10:07:19

“The number of items on sale had declined significantly the last few months”

I’ve noticed this as well in the Wednesday flyers. Nice cuts of meat are rarely on sale, and stuff that is on sale costs as much as $1/lb more than it on previous sales.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 11:36:28

Even if stores can’t afford sales, they need sales anyway to clear out inventory eventually because stuff expires. Your sale stock-up stuff may have been old — by old I mean a month, ancient in gocery time.* So being on sale doesn’t necessarily correlate to anything economic.

Lean Cuisine seems to operate on a monthly cycle. The meals sit there for three weeks doing nothing, then it goes on sale for 40% off and disappears in 3 days. The pattern is so consistent that they can probably schedule their chicken slaughter to match.

—————-
*except for Twinkies and Ho-hos, which last as long as Toyotas.

 
 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 08:18:27

Not seeing it here in Denver, not at King Soopers (Kroger) or Safeway. And we have some of the cheapest gas in the country here!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 09:55:23

Same here. It didn’t get as high as elsewhere (I think we maxed out in the low 3.70 range. I’m seeing maybe 3.66 now.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-05-25 11:04:51

I passed $4.09 in Sausalito on my way to SF. Luckily I was on my bike and singing in the rain! A little higher price up near San Quentin where I live (near, not in San Quentin).

 
 
Comment by polly
2011-05-25 10:49:56

Loss leaders only work if people buy a lot of other stuff too. This is where the beauty of being able to walk to the grocery store comes in. If you have to drive a ways to go to the store, you are going to do your general shopping at the place where you went to get the specials. If you can stop off at the store on the way home, you can pick up what is on sale and wait for the next sale to get the other stuff. I stopped off for groceries last night. There wasn’t a single thing in my cart that wasn’t on sale, most of it substantially on sale. I’ll stop off for a few sale items at the other store tonight or tomorrow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MrBubble
2011-05-25 11:10:10

I feel lucky that I have that option. I can stop by either of two grocery stores on my bike commute home to pick up the specials. You’d be amazed at what you can carry in two rear-rack panniers and bungee cords! I look like Fred Sanford’s truck, but I don’t have to “pay at the pump”.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-05-25 06:21:12

Banks Face $17 Billion in Suits Over Foreclosures
wsj.com

State attorneys general told five of the nation’s largest banks on Tuesday they face a potential liability of at least $17 billion in civil lawsuits if a settlement isn’t reached to address improper foreclosure practices, according to people familiar with the matter.

The figure doesn’t cover additional billions of dollars in potential claims from federal agencies such as the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Justice Department. State and federal officials haven’t proposed a specific comprehensive settlement figure, but Tuesday’s discussions represented the first effort to formally quantify potential liability.

Representatives of the nation’s largest banks met in individual meetings on Tuesday with state and federal officials designed to highlight the potential costs they will face if a settlement isn’t reached.

Banks and federal officials have made halting progress over two months to settle allegations of abuses related to mortgage servicing, and the numbers floated Tuesday indicate that the two sides are still far apart on the size of the penalty.

Banks have proposed a $5 billion settlement that would be used to compensate any borrowers previously wronged in the foreclosure process and provide transition assistance for borrowers who are ousted from their homes. Federal and state officials have dismissed that as insufficient. Some officials have pushed for a total price tag of more than $20 billion to resolve foreclosure-handling abuses that surfaced last fall.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-05-25 06:31:29

FB wants a do over

Time to change that to FB gets a do over.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-05-25 06:28:20

For those of you renting in NYC

——————–

Here’s Why New York City’s Rent Is Still Too Damn High
Real Clear Markets | 05/25/2011 | Stephen Meister

With New York City’s rent laws set to expire June 15, “tenant” activists are decrying the catastrophic consequences should Albany’s Republican-controlled Senate fail to renew them. But these laws actually harm most tenants: By protecting long-term residents at the expense of newer (not wealthier) ones, they’ve caused huge increases in the City’s overall rents.

Given over 8 million people call the Big Apple home - only a million of whom are fortunate enough to live in rent-regulated apartments - the wild popularity of the rent stabilization laws among New York Democrats only proves that a cohesive voting bloc has enabled a tyranny of the minority, and the perpetuation of common-sense defying and grossly unjust laws.

The complex labyrinth of State and City rent laws imposes price controls on buildings built before 1974 (and some newer ones where the owners have sought special property tax breaks). Protected tenants (including their children if they remain in the apartment after their parents die) must be given a never-ending series of lease renewals at the “legal” rents.

That means as these older buildings obsolesce, they can’t be demolished and replaced with modern high rises containing far more apartments because there’s no way to evict the protected tenants.

That’s why New York City’s streetscape is still littered with thousands of old tenements - low-rise “walk ups” with outdoor fire escapes I wouldn’t want to put to the test. In a free-market, developers would assemble several adjacent tenements, raze them and build a modern high-rise containing hundreds of apartments to replace the handful lost.

But, because of the rent laws, even a single protected tenant, can block a major development; either that, or the “hold-outs” end up with massive pay-offs to vacate.

The laws also encourage protected tenants to hoard apartments too large for their needs: As they grow older and their children move out, or spouses die off or divorce, it doesn’t pay for them to scale down to a smaller apartment because then the tenant would be forced to enter the free market and pay more for the appropriately sized apartment.

more

Comment by yensoy
2011-05-25 08:09:30

Reporter has never heard of eminent domain, it seems.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2011-05-25 08:30:17

But of course! Is ham-fisted government intervention in the RE market causing problems? Then the answer must be to add a different type of ham-fisted government intervention!

 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:20:35

Do they really charge lower rent in new buildings?

Comment by whyoung
2011-05-25 12:38:44

No, they definitely don’t charge lower than stabilized rents in a new building. Market rates fluctuate and vary a lot by location.
But a developer can sometimes get tax breaks and permission to build bigger/higher if they set aside a number of apartments as “affordable” (rented based on income, usually with a lottery).

Also, zoning restrictions on height/density can make it not viable to replace the old style tenements in some neighborhoods, as you could not build something substantially bigger than is already there.

In NYC they also have a thing called “air rights”… each parcel of land has a theoretical maximum of how large a building can be built in that space. Under some circumstances those rights can be sold to adjacent parcels so they can build higher than they would be able to otherwise. (A friends church made big bucks off selling the air rights over their church and parsonage.)

 
 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 08:20:45

Wow 2 banana and I agree
Rent control and placing low cost housing in high cost areas is a HUGE waste. I think it’s done not to keep the poor happy but to keep cheap labor close to high priced buisnesses. Do away with cheap housing and these companies will have to pay higher wages or bus people in to work for them or close and move which will drive down real estate prices and fix the problem. It’s a waste of tax dollars, that benefits the rich company owner (who make more money), the customers of said company (who pay lower prices) and to some extent the poor employee who is lucky enough to get into one of these programs (possibly better schools and nicer neighborhood but food and all other things are still more expensive so it may be a wash). It does not increase employment and hurts property owners outside the elite zone who have to compete with these wage subsidies. It also hurts workers in the elite zone that don’t get cheap housing.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-05-25 10:07:16

Speaking as one who lives here, while this is all true, the housing bubble changes one’s perspective.

Would it have really made sense to toss hundreds of thousands out of the neighborhoods they lived in when rents spiked, only to have those rents crash again? Rent “stabilization” actually worked.

In most of the U.S. if you want stability and a long term stake in a neighborhood, you buy. But here only 1/3 of the housing units are owner occupied, and the price to rent ratio they charge you to get one of them is massive.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 10:35:02

…and this is the city that runs our country.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-05-25 19:04:45

As a Noo yorker here is the truth

Rent stabilization was done as WT explained to smooth out the peaks and valleys of apartment buildings rental income.

Think of it as an encumbrance on the property, like allowing people to use your driveway to get to the property in back….

It also fosters Long term ownership of the building by allowing the landlord to raise the rent to a new market rate, when they move out or die.So hold the building for 30 years and most of the apartments will be market rate.

The criminality comes in when the landlord wants to speed up the process by harassing the lowest paid tenants. And refusing to pay a tenant to leave in exchange for cancelling the lease.

Now a lot of those “I am the KING of my castle” type landlords refuse to honor the lease and of course tenants have an option not to pay the rent…and it becomes a standoff.

What people don’t realize is if the building was a market rate building the landlord could have never afforded to buy it in the first place since yearly rental income has a direct relation to the selling price.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-05-25 06:32:03

Maybe there is hope…

——————

The U.S. fiscal solution: Follow Canada’s fiscal lead
Globe and Mail | 05/25/2011 | David Rosenberg

As we have seen time and again, every country pursuing profligate debt-financed fiscal policies ultimately hits some sort of wall - as was the case in Iceland recently, not to mention the Club Med countries in the euro zone. The United States may, too, if it doesn’t get its fiscal act together, as the recent Standard & Poor’s credit outlook warning attests.

Canada did hit that debt wall nearly two decades ago as its deficits and debts became increasingly difficult to reverse. The federal government, both Liberals and Conservatives, borrowed and spent like drunken sailors for a long time. Similar actions unfolding in the U.S. today may well create the illusion of prosperity, but as any Canadian will tell you (or perhaps anyone from New Zealand a decade earlier), there is no such thing as a free lunch.

Canada endured not just the ignominy of credit downgrades but also recurring financial market gyrations that frequently disrupted business activity. The Liberal government that found its way to power in 1993 spent most of the next five years enacting tough deficit-reducing policies that it never campaigned on.

Indeed, at a time when the world is looking for leadership, especially when it comes to fiscal rectitude, Canada has evolved as the poster child for how to do things right. After years of massive deficit financing from the late 1960s to the early 1980s, Canada headed into the 1990s in very rough shape from a national balance-sheet perspective.

The problem for the U.S. is that the deficit ratio is about twice what it was in Canada, and in Canada we had a government with a majority that could take charge without special-interest groups exerting an influence on the decision-making process. Sacred cows were slaughtered, just as unaffordable U.S. handouts like mortgage-interest deductibility will be, once real tax reform eventually comes their way.

Comment by polly
2011-05-25 07:59:21

Of course, Canada has socialized health insurance which makes it much easier for new businesses to start up and become profitable. It also has a giant trade surplus with its big neighbor to the south. The Canadian embassy has a huge map with detailed information on the trade relationship with the US for each province and territory. I was there for an movie that was part of the environmental film festival this year. I think there was a tiny trade deficit for Ontario, but all the others were surpluses. A lot of it is energy exports, but manufacturing too.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 08:06:27

Canada is benefiting from the commodities bubble. But I pretty much agree with what you said.

Too bad they’re still in their housing bubble.

Comment by aragonzo
2011-05-25 10:07:52

You can’t imagine. There’s very little industry in Vancouver yet houses are going for SF prices. If an average household bought an average priced house in Vancouver at today’s prices, 70% of the pre-tax income would go to financing the mortgage. To put that in perspective, an impoverished Ugandan spends 80% of earnings on food and shelter. The insanity has gone on for ten years. At some point, it will end because it can’t continue. However, the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 08:04:17

So we have to emulate our commie cousins from the great white north? Who woulda thunk?

Question: How are capital gains taxed in Cananda?

Answer: (from wikipedia)

“Currently 50.00% of realized capital gains are taxed in Canada at an individual’s tax rate. Some exceptions apply, such as selling one’s primary residence which may be exempt from taxation.[2] Capital gains made by investments in a Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) are not taxed.

For example, if your capital gains (profit) is $100, you are only taxed on $50 at your marginal tax rate. That is, if you were in the top tax bracket, you’d be taxed at approx 43%. A formula for this example using the top tax bracket would be as follows:

Capital gain x 50.00% x marginal tax rate = capital gain tax

= $100 x 50.00% x 43%

= $50 x 43%

= $21.50

In this example your capital gains tax on $100 is $21.50, leaving you with $78.50.”

Gasp! Candians (especially the Rich!) pay more taxes than in the US! How is it that Canada even survives?

Comment by yensoy
2011-05-25 08:12:03

Very sensible, as I have argued before, to offset the effects of inflation. A 50% discount effectively gives you a cushion for about 10 years worth of inflation. For shorter terms, you actually come out ahead.

Comment by The_Overdog
2011-05-25 08:46:36

How is this sensible vis a vis inflation?

50% at the max tax bracket of $43 is 21.5%. So the max capitial gains tax in Canada is 21.5%. It doesn’t mention a breakdown between short and long term, so I’m assuming there is none.

The max US capital gains tax percent is 15%, for stocks held longer than a year (You mentioned 10. That’s longer than one). How does paying 6.5% more (if you are wealthy) have any direct impact on inflation? It doesn’t.

I personally like Canada’s model better than the US, because at my tax bracket, I’d be paying less capital gains than I do in the US, but that is neither here or there. If there is no breakdown between short and long term, then being a daytrader is much more lucrative in Canada tax-wise than it is in the US.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2011-05-25 12:06:51

yensoy is referring to the economic ideal where you only pay tax on the amount of capital gain that is not attributable to inflation. This idea, of course, has been around since the beginning of the concept of capital gains, but has never been implemented anywhere because it is too complicated to implement. Or, it has been too complicated to implement in the past. With computer aided tax calculation so widespread, it is arguable that you could implement it now. But no one ever will, because it is sufficiently complicated that most people don’t see it immediately (they want to think that they made *good* investments, not that their investments kept up with inflation plus a tiny bit more) and governments don’t want to give up the money. When the anti-tax crowd argues, they just skip straight to “capital gains shouldn’t be taxed” rather than try to make this argument.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-05-25 13:13:30

Oh ok. That makes sense. I mean not really. If we’re going to zero out inflation for captital gains, shouldn’t we zero it out for everything?

The settlement process with retailers for unconsumed items is gonna be a blast!!! It’ll double the size of the US economy by itself!!

I liked it better when anti-taxers were honest about being against taxes. Now they try to be all clever but just aren’t.

 
Comment by polly
2011-05-25 15:08:37

Raising the income at which higher marginal rates kick in (this year you start paying 28% at $X, but next year you start paying it at $Y where X <Y) is how you would do that. Also bumping up the standard dedcution.

Again, politicians don’t talk about it that way, because if they did it too much, voters might start to decide they should get that adjustment every year. There are very few places in the tax code where numbers that could get adjusted every year actually are adjusted every year. I think they set out a new interest rates on various payment issues quite often, and mileage rates (for use as a business deduction) are adjusted every year.

 
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 08:24:05

I’ll bet the fact that they pay 3500 per person in medical care vs the 7000+ in the US doesn’t hurt either.

Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 09:19:51

Neither does an abundance of oil.

 
 
Comment by Al
2011-05-25 10:02:05

I like David’s work, but he needed to do a bit more research on this one.

The Liberal govt in 1993 didn’t cut that much. The main cutting was in transfers to the provinces, which proceeded to rack up obscene debt levels. A combination of federal and provincial debt in Canada compared to federal and state debt in the US wouldn’t look that much different. Ontario makes California look like a paragon of thrift.

Main differences between Canada and the US? Less spending on war-fighting, and taxation that’s less favourable to the upper class.

Comment by measton
2011-05-25 10:56:45

and health care that costs 50% less.

 
Comment by polly
2011-05-25 11:32:20

Thanks for the extra info.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 07:17:21

U.S. Mortgage Applications Climbed 1.1% Last Week on Purchases
~ Bloomberg - May 25,

Mortgage applications in the U.S. rose for the fourth consecutive week as home purchases and refinancing gained.

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s index of loan applications climbed 1.1 percent in the week ended May 20. The group’s purchase index was up 1.5 percent and a measure of refinancing increased 0.9 percent.

The data are consistent with a government report yesterday that showed purchases of new houses rose in April for a second month, helped by job creation and borrowing costs close to a six-month low. At the same time, the excess supply of unsold homes and foreclosure-driven price declines are preventing a sustained rebound in housing.

“There is still a long way to go before the sector becomes normal or healthy,” Jennifer Lee, a senior economist at BMO Capital Markets in Toronto, said before the report. “Demand will remain constrained by high unemployment, constrained credit conditions and fears of further price falls.”

The average rate on a 30-year fixed loan increased last week to 4.69 percent from the prior week’s 4.60 percent that was the lowest since the end of November, today’s report showed. Borrowing costs reached 4.21 percent in October, the lowest since the group’s records began in 1990.

The average rate on a 15-year fixed mortgage rose to 3.78 percent from 3.75 percent.

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2011-05-25 07:46:23

‘In a free-market, developers would assemble several adjacent tenements, raze them and build a modern high-rise containing hundreds of apartments to replace the handful lost.’

Economic incentives for construction jobs?

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 07:46:28

Note:Now the IMF says they will take the Greeks gold as collateral! Screw the damn IMF, I hope

~From: Aaron Task of The Daily Ticker.

ITEM: Financial markets shuddered Monday as fears over Europe’s sovereign debt crisis resurfaced yet again. Still, the Dow closed off its worst levels of the session amid the conventional view that Greece’s debt crisis can be managed.

But Endgame author John Mauldin says Greece won’t be any more “contained” than subprime mortgages were in 2008.

“It’s not something that stops at the European waters,” Mauldin says. “Just like the subprime crisis didn’t stop in California…I’m worried this one has a lot of contagion and it’ll affect the world.”

As for the mechanism for that contagion, Mauldin lays out the following scenario in the event of a Greek default:

- Greece has to nationalize its banks.
- Greek citizens are forced to take deposits in drachmas, rather than euros.
- Greek consumers and businesses then default on all debts because of the resulting haircut, which he estimates at 50%.
- French and German banks are forced to take write-downs on their Greek exposure.
- The ECB is forced to take a write-down on its exposure to Greek debt.

Such a scenario would not go unnoticed in Portugal or, especially, Ireland, where voters have already shown their displeasure with having to pay for bank bailouts, Mauldin notes.

Meanwhile, U.S. banks have written credit-default swaps to European banks. Most of these positions are hedged but “you’re only balanced as long as both of those counterparties are good,” Mauldin says. “If you have a bad counterparty, now you’re out of balance.”

If you’ll recall, it wasn’t the failing subprime mortgages per se that caused the real crisis in 2008, but banks refusal to trade with other banks. It was this “counterparty risk” which caused the financial system to seize up, which is why policymakers here and in Europe are doing everything and anything to prevent a repeat.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-05-25 07:50:24

Mark Haines passes away.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/43167028

Comment by oxide
2011-05-25 11:43:58

Does this mean more Larry Kudlow?

Comment by CrackerJim
2011-05-25 13:39:56

Who is Larry Kudlow? Wait, back up, who is Mark Haines?

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 07:51:25

Note: Now the IMF says it will accept Greece’s gold as collateral. Perfect time for Greece to say, up-yours IMF default and get the hell out of the EU.

ITEM: Shades of 2008: A Greek Default Won’t Be ‘Contained’, John Mauldin Says. By Aaron Task | Daily Ticker –

Financial markets shuddered Monday as fears over Europe’s sovereign debt crisis resurfaced yet again. Still, the Dow closed off its worst levels of the session amid the conventional view that Greece’s debt crisis can be managed.

But Endgame author John Mauldin says Greece won’t be any more “contained” than subprime mortgages were in 2008.

“It’s not something that stops at the European waters,” Mauldin says. “Just like the sub-prime crisis didn’t stop in California…I’m worried this one has a lot of contagion and it’ll affect the world.”

As for the mechanism for that contagion, Mauldin lays out the following scenario in the event of a Greek default:

- Greece has to nationalize its banks.
- Greek citizens are forced to take deposits in drachmas, rather than euros.
- Greek consumers and businesses then default on all debts because of the resulting haircut, which he estimates at 50%.
- French and German banks are forced to take write-downs on their Greek exposure.
- The ECB is forced to take a write-down on its exposure to Greek debt.

Such a scenario would not go unnoticed in Portugal or, especially, Ireland, where voters have already shown their displeasure with having to pay for bank bailouts, Mauldin notes.

Meanwhile, U.S. banks have written credit-default swaps to European banks. Most of these positions are hedged but “you’re only balanced as long as both of those counter-parties are good,” Mauldin says. “If you have a bad counter-party, now you’re out of balance.”

If you’ll recall, it wasn’t the failing subprime mortgages per se that caused the real crisis in 2008, but banks refusal to trade with other banks. It was this “counter-party risk” which caused the financial system to seize up, which is why policymakers here and in Europe are doing everything and anything to prevent a repeat.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-05-25 09:51:23

Now the IMF says it will accept Greece’s gold as collateral. Perfect time for Greece to say, up-yours IMF default and get the hell out of the EU.

Crafty bankers! They will lend you fiatscos if you put up gold as a guarantee. Why don’t the Greeks just promise to pay it back with their own fiatscos? They could bring the Drachma back!

Comment by measton
2011-05-25 10:55:39

Seriously the bankers want gold, but the workers will get paid in Drachma.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 08:12:51

“The attempt to maintain stable prices through monetary manipulation became a swamp which the Federal Reserve entered in 1923, and in which it has been mired ever since.” ~Elgin Groseclose

~ We should abandon our debt-based currency and establish a sound money system. At some point in time the fiat dollar will go bye,bye no matter what the fed does. They are certainly doing a fine job of dollar destruction, getting better at it every day.

Comment by lavi d
2011-05-25 12:37:58

We should abandon our debt-based currency and establish a sound money system

One word: Bitcoin.

“Bitcoin’s peer-to-peer topology and lack of central administration make it infeasible for any authority, governmental or otherwise, to manipulate the value of bitcoins or induce inflation by producing more of them.”

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:37:54

Fewer government jobs during tough times
But payroll costs continue to grow
By Brian Joseph
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 at 5:35 p.m.

In this time of crushing budget deficits and guaranteed public pension plans, one sentiment seems widespread among voters: government always grows. Even with cutbacks and a floundering economy, many Americans clearly believe that government only gets bigger.

But in California, government has indeed shrunk by one metric: the number of employees on the payroll. Employment numbers independently collected by the state Employment Development Department show that since the housing market collapsed in 2008 more than 100,000 federal, state and local government jobs have been eliminated in California, creating the worst job market in that sector since at least 1990.

All of those lost jobs can be attributed to cuts made to address the state’s chronic, multi-billion budget deficit or to the economic conditions that contributed to the deficit, California economists say.

“It’s indicative to how very wired government is into the economy,” said Christopher Thornberg, founding principle at Beacon Economics in Los Angeles.

State Budget Watch is a project to give readers a deeper understanding of the scope, impact and reasons behind California’s fiscal problems, and to explore the stakes involved in potential solutions. The project includes Sacramento reporters Michael Gardner of The San Diego Union-Tribune and Brian Joseph of the Orange County Register and editor Daniel Weintraub of California Health Report, a website that focuses on health and public policy issues in the state.

More than 3,600 government jobs have been lost, on average, each month since June 2008, when government employment in California peaked at more than 2,522,000. In all, more than 118,000 government jobs — or about 5 percent — were lost through March 2011.

That doesn’t compare to the pain faced by the construction industry, which lost 280,000 jobs (33 percent) during that period, or the manufacturing industry, which lost more than and 201,000 jobs (14 percent). But over the last year, the government sector has been the biggest drag on California’s job recovery while construction, manufacturing and other industries have begun to rebound.

In government, the hardest hit were employees of school districts, counties and cities, who combined accounted for the vast majority of the lost government jobs. State government, on the other hand, lost a few thousand jobs while the federal government actually increased its job offerings in California by a few thousand, all in the Department of Defense.

Jobs lost

How the reduction of government jobs at all levels in California compares to other hard hit sectors since June 2008.

Government: 118,000

Manufacturing: 201,000

Construction: 280,000

Source: California Employment Development Department

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 12:10:15

while the federal government actually increased its job offerings in California by a few thousand, all in the Department of Defense.

“TrueAngry™” + “TrueReducetheDeficitNow!Today!™” = “The protection of Bangor, Maine & Astoria, Oregon from sudden military invasion proceeds relentle$$ly!” ;-)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 08:40:43

Stink bug spread worries growers across nation
Associated Press

EMMITSBURG, Md. — An insect with a voracious appetite, no domestic natural predators and a taste for everything from apples to lima beans has caused millions of dollars in crop damage and may just be getting started.

The brown marmorated stink bug, a three-quarter-inch invader native to Asia, is believed to have been brought first to the Allentown, Pa., area in 1998. The bug began appearing in mid-Atlantic orchards in 2003-04 and exploded in number last year.

This spring, stink bugs have been seen in 33 states, including every one east of the Mississippi River and as far west as California, Oregon and Washington.

“All that we do know for certain is that a tremendously large population went into overwintering in fall 2010. So, if they survived, there could be a very large population emerging in the spring,” said Tracy Leskey, a research entomologist at the U.S. Agriculture Department’s Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville W.Va.

Growers in the mid-Atlantic region have reported the worst problems, and the apple industry appears hit hardest, with $37 million in damage to growers in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia, according to the U.S. Apple Association. That’s about 18 percent of the Mid-Atlantic crop.

Mark Seetin, the association’s director of regulatory and industry affairs, called it the worst threat to farmers he’s see in his 40 years in agriculture.

Growers in Washington state, the nation’s biggest apple producer, haven’t seen major damage so far, said Mike Willett, vice president for scientific affairs for the Yakima, Wash.-based Northwest Horticultural Council. The bug was first spotted in the state a couple years ago.

The bug, named for the foul smell it gives off when crushed, will feed on nearly anything, including cherries, tomatoes, grapes, lima beans, soybeans, green peppers, apples and peaches. It uses a needle-like mouth to pierce the skin of its host fruit or vegetable, leaving behind a spot that is disfigured and discolored.

Stink bugs wiped out up to 40 percent of Tom Haas’ peaches last season at his Cherry Hill Orchards in Lancaster, Pa. The peaches looked so bad that Haas let the fruit fall to the ground, where it rotted.

“This is the worst, probably, that I’ve dealt with in 25 years,” said Haas, the owner of the family-run orchard. “The damage they do to fruit is horrendous.”

Comment by Steve J
2011-05-25 08:50:17

Maybe the Asian carp will take care of them!

 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 12:50:44

The stink bugs came from Asia. Obama grew up in Asia (Indonesia). Therefore the stink bugs are Obama’s fault.

How’s that Hope and Change working out for you now kidz?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 13:42:18

The stink bugs came from Asia. Obama grew up in Asia (Indonesia). Therefore the stink bugs are Obama’s fault.

Hey Wally, you’ll always have a friend in Rash Limpbaughs if you keep exercising your critical thinking skills with that sorta logic! :-)

How’s that Hope and Change working out for you now kidz?

Just swell Wally! :-)

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 15:37:44

Who is Wally?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-05-25 14:02:15

Wow. I had no idea. I’ve seen these in Oregon for awhile now and found one in my car last week. In fact, an Oregonian article I just looked up lists my old neighborhood as the first place to see them, and as having them since 2004. I think I remember seeing them even before that when I lived there…

I will commence with squishing on the next one I see.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 08:55:02

market pulse

May 25, 2011, 11:45 a.m. EDT · CORRECTED
House prices slip 2.5% in first quarter, FHFA says
By Steve Goldstein

(Fixes description of price drop from April 2007 peak.)

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — U.S. house prices fell a seasonally adjusted 2.5% in the first quarter and 0.3% in March, the Federal Housing Finance Agency said Wednesday, using home sales price information from Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-acquired mortgages. The March index is 19.8% below its April 2007 peak.

 
Comment by measton
2011-05-25 10:36:49

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Testimony by White House consumer adviser Elizabeth Warren before a House subcommittee broke down into acrimony when the panel’s Republican chairman accused her of lying about the terms of her appearance.

Warren testified on Tuesday before a House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform panel about her efforts to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency Republicans and Wall Street do not like and want to gut.

The hearing focused on disputes over the scope of the agency’s power, but her appearance ended in heated wrangling over how long she would testify.

About an hour into the hearing Republicans sought to temporarily adjourn for votes. Warren objected to sticking around for more questions upon their return, saying her afternoon was packed with meetings and that the committee had agreed she would only stay an hour.

“Congressman, we had an agreement,” she told Republican subcommittee Chairman Patrick McHenry after some back-and-forth.

[ For complete coverage of politics and policy, go to Yahoo! Politics ]

“You had no agreement, you are making this up, Ms. Warren,” McHenry responded.

The committee’s lead Democrat, Elijah Cummings, jumped in, telling McHenry, “I’m trying to be cordial here, you just accused the lady of lying.”

Tuesday’s mini-drama of Democrats vs. Republicans vs. Warren has played out for months and would escalate if the Obama administration formally nominates her to become the director of the consumer agency.

Warren, a Harvard law professor who previously served as a watchdog for the government’s $700 billion financial system bailout, has run into strong opposition from Republicans, who say she would be too confrontational with the financial industry.

Anyone else think that a little confrontation with the financial industry might be a good thing. Seriously who supports the GOP here. We’ve just been raped by WS and they are worried about a little confrontation, F them.

news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_financial_regulation_warren

Comment by measton
2011-05-25 10:54:21

The last line was great

But McHenry got in a parting shot, releasing a statement at the end of the day: “I was shocked by Ms. Warren’s blatant sense of entitlement.

Sounds like McHenry hates uppity women

and

Isn’t this the pot calling the kettle black. Is there anyone with a bigger sense of entitlement than a Congressman. Well other than WS bankers of course Heads I win Tails I win.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 11:59:38

Sounds like McHenry hates uppity women

Yes, those darn women. The nerve of them, wanting to have careers and boss the menfolk around. They should stay home and…

…you can guess where this is going, so I’ll stop right here.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-05-25 11:59:52

shocked by Ms. Warren’s blatant sense of entitlement.

Man those people are so un-original with their overused words shoveled to them by the puppet masters. Is there an original thought in their head??????? Here, let me play……

The lazy whiners with the greatest sense of entitlement are the moochers wanting to live in a collectivist utopia where their socialist, empty-suit wealth-redistributing pals punish the evil and mean producers who are responsible for all the free-market private job creation.

But in china. What a joke.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 11:59:29

“…has run into strong opposition from Republicans, who say she would be too confrontational with the financial industry.”

“…about her efforts to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency Republicans and Wall Street do not like and want to gut.”

We repubicans care deeply about the peon consumers, we really do, trust us, besides de-regulated “TrueCorporation$Inc.™” SOCOTUS persons are “profee$ional” & “ethical” too! Look at their “pattern$-of-behavior$”, $imply out$tanding! ;-)

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 12:04:04

“…an agency Republicans and Wall Street do not like and want to gut.”

Republitards = Wall Street’s cheap whores

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 13:01:06

“Republitards?” That’s not a very Hopey Changey thing to say.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-05-25 18:30:45

Retardicans view women as objects and vessels. They’ve never respected women and never will.

 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-05-25 11:09:49

Nevada wants to make it easier for buyers to overpay for housing by making appraisers lie.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42849615/ns/business-personal_finance/

“Nevada state Sen. Mike Schneider is trying to fight back with proposed legislation that aims to set a floor under prices, which have fallen well over 50 percent on average in the Las Vegas area over the past five years. A few months ago, he sponsored a bill proposing a radical new mandate for appraisers: Stop paying attention to those “distressed” sales. Legislators in other states and industry executives are watching closely.”

“The legislation’s legality has been called into question because it runs counter to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, the federal regulations home appraisers are required to follow.”

“Opponents — who include professional appraisers and their trade association, as well as some skeptical realtors — say there’s no way such a law can be worded that wouldn’t require appraisers to violate those regulations.”

If everyone knows they are lying because that’s the law, their lies would be less valuable.

Comment by vicever
2011-05-25 17:16:26

Why not the appraiser and insurance company merge into one entity. If the house fall lower than appraised value, the entity pays the difference. That way, the incentive to over-inflate will be gone. It is just like two children dividing an apple, one take the cut, the other choose first. The apple will be divided perfectly. I wish the same principle can be applied to everywhere, we will have the fairest country.

Comment by ahansen
2011-05-25 23:21:49

You can do that with apples, too…!?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 11:58:59

I can’t help but wonder whether all this stormy weather won’t put a damper on the otherwise red hot summer sales season for Midwest homes?

‘Major Tornado Outbreak’ Seen for Midwest
By Brian K. Sullivan - May 25, 2011 10:33 AM PT

A “major tornado outbreak” is expected to develop in the central U.S. states surrounding the area where the Mississippi and Ohio rivers meet, according to the U.S. Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Oklahoma.

The National Weather Service is currently tracking two storms capable of producing tornadoes in western Missouri, including Kansas City.

A tornado watch, meaning the deadly storms may develop, was issued from Missouri to Indiana, including Indianapolis and St. Louis, according to the weather service. Memphis, downstream from where the Mississippi and Ohio rivers meet in southern Illinois, is covered by the storm center’s forecast for later today.

“The potential is increasing for a major tornado outbreak,” the center said. “Widespread wind damage and large hail are also a prominent concern through the evening hours.”

Today’s outbreak comes a day after tornadoes swept across Texas, Arkansas, Kansas and Oklahoma yesterday, killing 14 people, according to the Associated Press. Earlier this week, at least 122 people were killed by a tornado in Joplin, Missouri, the single deadliest U.S. twister on records going back to 1950.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 12:03:00

If the residential housing bubble hasn’t been a total laugh riot, well, save your yuks for the collapse of commercial real estate. Data point from Tucson:

Foothills’ Gallery Row faces foreclosure

This is a ritzy shopping center in the most well-off part of the Tucson area. Fun story comment:

“the whole intersection of campbell/skyline is a MASS FORECLOSURE

“lots of debt up there for lenders to cramdown - ie take losses on

“don’t worry, it’s only a $100-200 million in losses

“glad we don’t have to eat that”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 12:26:17

Wonder what the libs think about one of their own saying things like this about their leader. Plenty of them are very disappointed in Barry.

ITEM: Did Peter Fonda Commit a Federal Offense by Threatening President Obama? (AP)

While promoting a new documentary at the Cannes film festival in France last weekend, Peter Fonda made comments that could be construed as threats against President Obama.

“I’m training my grandchildren to use long-range rifles,” the actor told The Daily Telegraph at the international film festival. “For what purpose? Well, I’m not going to say the words ‘Barack Obama,’ but …”

With those words, the “Easy Rider” star may have committed a federal crime.

“Clearly, there is a federal law that prohibits threatening the president,” Washington, D.C.-based attorney Ross Nabatoff tells FOX411.com. “Now, the question is, is that a threat as opposed to him expressing his First Amendment rights? But you could conceivably construe that as a threat—he names the president. It’s a federal offense. He could be incarcerated.”

Fonda’s comments could attract the attention of the Secret Service, Nabatoff said.

“They take threats against the president pretty seriously these days,” explains Nabatoff. “There’s a lot of angry people.”

The Secret Service had no comment on the matter.

Fonda’s attorney did not return a request for comment, and Fonda’s representative was unable to reach the actor.

Back at Cannes, the actor wasn’t finished.

“We are heading for a major conflict between the haves and the have nots,” Fonda said. “I came here many years ago with a biker movie, and we stopped a war. Now, it’s about starting the world.”

“There’s no room any more for a sissy and, like I said, don’t forget that I’ve got grandsons who I’ve trained with long-distance rifles,” Fonda repeated. “We have to run like mofos to change this world.”

The fact that Fonda, 71, made his comments overseas could work in his favor should legal trouble ensue.

“The federal courts may not have jurisdiction in France,” Nabatoff said.

Fonda was in Cannes promoting “The Big Fix,” a documentary about the BP Gulf oil spill, a movie critical of Obama’s handling of the crisis.

Last week while promoting the film, Fonda said that he “sent an email to President Obama saying, ‘You are a f***ing traitor,’ using those words… ‘You’re a traitor, you allowed foreign boots on our soil telling our military — in this case the Coast Guard — what they can and could not do, and telling us, the citizens of the United States, what we could or could not do’.”

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 12:44:40

“…telling our military — in this case the Coast Guard — what they can and could not do, and telling us, the citizens of the United States, what we could or could not do’.”

Hey Peter, the “non-Hawaiian” in the event of a Nation emergency/disaster, by golly he gets to be “The Decider!” or should we let the US Congress form a committee & discuss before acting? ;-)

Perhaps suffering from LSD induced Dementia…

 
Comment by lavi d
2011-05-25 12:46:59

Wonder what the libs think about one of their own saying things like this about their leader. Plenty of them are very disappointed in Barry.

I’d say it’s pretty obvious that Fonda is not one of the “libs” own.

Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 13:04:49

LOL! Riiiiight!

 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-05-25 16:10:03

This is good news. If inflation starts hitting the electronics/toys/cheap crap from China/etc, it’ll be harder for The Bernanke to claim inflation is under control.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 12:37:45

I’ll be brief:

BWAHAHAHicHAHAHicHAHAHAHAHicHAHAHic* (DennisN™) :-)

“The O.C.!”

Agent hopes to save mansion from foreclosure
May 25th, 2011, by Jeff Collins / OC Register

At one point, McMonigle was asking $87 million for the property, then listed it for $57 million when it officially was added to the multiple listing service database in May 2010. He eventually lowered the price to $37 million, although it’s still the highest-priced house on the Orange County market.

McMonigle left Coldwell Banker in October and formed his own independent brokerage, the McMonigle Group.

McMonigle says his brokerage will continue operating — in a new location if necessary.

In addition to the Newport Coast mansion and his headquarters, three other delinquent properties will be surrendered to the bank since they’re worth less than is owed on them, he said.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 12:53:41

~ I am sure this clown preacher loved the bank when they lent the money…

Faith Christian files for bankruptcy
S. BRADY CALHOUN / News Herald Writer

PANAMA CITY BEACH — Faith Christian Family Church has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and staved off, for now, a foreclosure auction against the church building and property.

According to court documents, SunTrust bank loaned the church $2.8 million in August 2008, taking the deed on the church at 13300 Back Beach Road as collateral. The church stopped making payments in October of 2010, the documents state, and SunTrust filed for foreclosure earlier this year. An online auction of the church had been set for Thursday.

Markus Bishop, the pastor of Faith Christian, said he sat down with executives from SunTrust when the church was only two months behind and tried to work out a repayment plan but they refused to take anything that was “remotely reasonable.”

“First of all we intend to pay 100 percent of all our debts and we’re only here because we have been forced into a position to defend ourselves against SunTrust bank,” Bishop said. “We’re not going to lay down and let somebody foreclose” on a building that has $4 million in equity.

SunTrust officials said they make every effort to work with every customer in distress but declined to comment further on the situation.

Instead of a foreclosure, the church will attempt to sell any assets it has under judicial guidance in order to pay off its debts. Bishop’s multi-million parsonage is already up for sale and has been for some time, he said.

“That doesn’t fit who we are today,” Bishop said. “Who we are today is much different than who the man was who built that house.”

However, Bishop’s home is also at the center of a lawsuit between the church and the Bay County Property Appraiser’s Office, who refused to grant it tax exemption status as a parsonage.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 13:00:46

Eliminating the Mortgage Interest Deduction:
“before the bell…”

It’s Professor Bear…vs…”The poor, poor, Wealthie$”

Tax Scenario

The scenario includes interest payments of 5 percent on a $400,000 mortgage, Fleming said. If the mortgage deduction is eliminated, the family’s tax bill would increase 19 percent to $150,080 in 2013 from 2011, according to the analysis.

Deficit May Clip 12-Year Tax Streak for Wealthy Americans:
By Margaret Collins / Bloomberg

The year 2013 may snap a 12-year winning streak for wealthy Americans on taxes due on income, capital gains, dividends and giving money to their heirs.

Rates on income, capital gains and dividends will rise in 2013 because tax cuts extended last year are scheduled to expire at the end of 2012, unless Congress acts. In 2013, top earners also face additional levies on unearned income and wages to help pay for health-care reform.

Investments are the main asset of the wealthy while for the middle class it’s their home, said Edward Wolff, a professor of economics at New York University. The top 10 percent of wealth holders in 2007, the latest data available, owned 81 percent of stocks, Wolff said. “The preferential tax treatment of capital gains and dividends in the tax code definitely mainly benefits the rich,” :-)

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 13:02:40

WOW! This comes as a shock! Not…

Financially-Fragile Americans Lack Emergency Savings
By Kate Rogers May 25, 2011| FOXBusiness

So much for that old golden rule of having three-month’s salary saved up for a rainy day. According to a recent study, if an unexpected emergency warranted nearly half of American households couldn’t come up with $2,000 in 30 days.

In a recent study “Financially Fragile Households: Evidence and Implications,” published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, 28% of respondents said they “certainly” would not be able to put together the $2,000 in 30 days, while 22% said they “probably” would be unable to do so. These respondents were in households making between $100,000 and $150,000 annually.

The study was conducted among a random sample of 2,100 adults. It asked, “How confident are you that you could come up with $2,000 if an unexpected need arose within the next month?”

The study also found that 19% of respondents would rely, at least partially, on pawning or selling possessions or taking payday loans.

Study leader, Annamaria Lusardi of the George Washington School of Business, said America puts so much emphasis on financial security in the long-run for retirement that people don’t see the importance of saving for short-term needs.

“People are really not able to buffer themselves against a potentially small shock,” Lusardi said. “This speaks to why it’s so hard and painful if you don’t have a buffer.”

Although this was not included in the study, Lusardi said it is her own belief that the saving trend has been zero toward savings, and prior to the recession, the economy was running on credit. Those who do not have a precautionary fund rely on borrowing, however things have changed since the economic tornado.

“We have less opportunity now to rely on borrowing, because credit was also related to housing. Now with negative equity, that has gone away,” she said. “You don’t want to borrow at a high interest rate when a shock happens. That strategy is a dangerous strategy.”

Comment by The_Overdog
2011-05-25 14:01:20

Study leader, Annamaria Lusardi of the George Washington School of Business, said America puts so much emphasis on financial security in the long-run for retirement that people don’t see the importance of saving for short-term needs.

————–
Uhhh, if this is true, then within 30 days the majority of Americans (with 401ks and certainly among those households making $150k or more) could take a 401k loan to get $2k. So either they are grossly uninformed about the ways they can possibly come up with $2k over the course of 30 days or they don’t have much long term savings either.

 
Comment by rms
2011-05-26 00:05:45

“Although this was not included in the study, Lusardi said it is her own belief that the saving trend has been zero toward savings, and prior to the recession, the economy was running on credit.”

The U.S. economy [is] running on credit. QE2?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 13:03:32

Al Lewis

May 25, 2011, 2:04 p.m. EDT
The name is Dimon, not Demon
Commentary: Vilified CEO says the anger has surprised him
By Al Lewis

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — It’s not easy to stump a world-class executive who commands more than $2.2 trillion in assets, but one shareholder activist succeeded at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.’s annual meeting in Ohio last week.

“As a person of faith, my God believes you shouldn’t take advantage of people when they are down,” Dawn Dannenbring told the bank’s CEO Jamie Dimon, highlighting casualties in the mortgage mess. “Do you believe in the same God I believe in?”

Dimon’s response was appropriately circumspect: “That’s a hard one to answer.”

I asked Dimon about this encounter after he spoke at a scholarship dinner for the University of Colorado-Denver Business School on Thursday.

“I didn’t know what to say,” Dimon told me. “It’s a complicated question.”

It also underscores some fundamental differences between how people think on Main Street versus Wall Street. Is there really an old man in the sky watching over this confusing tangle of transactions we call the economy?

Dimon could have answered this theological inquisition by saying he believed in the God who commands, pay your debt. He could have quoted Psalm 37:21. “The wicked borrow and do not repay.”

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-05-25 13:34:45

a modified version of that Psalmistic sentiment: :-/

“The wicked borrow sons & daughters to fight in wars & preserve a $afe place for their wealth and do not repay.”

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 13:10:46

Number of home buyers plummets ‘as people were distracted by Royal Wedding and Easter’ By Daily Mail Reporter 25th May 2011

Bank holiday weekends made a significant dent in the property market last month after mortgage approvals dropped and buyers were rocked by economic uncertainty.

The number of mortgages agreed fell by 6 per cent during the month to 29,355 - almost a fifth lower than the previous April, according to the British Bankers’ Association (BBA).

The drop in the number of home owners remortgaging was even sharper, down 12 per cent from March to 20,844, the lowest level since January last year.
Slump: Mortgage approval rates in the UK took a dip in April after a run of bank holiday weekends

Slump: Mortgage approval rates in the UK took a dip in April after a run of bank holiday weekends

The BBA partly blamed the drop on the Easter and Royal Wedding bank holiday weekends in April, which distracted people from the property market as they made the most of the time off work.

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-05-25 13:24:38

Bloody Royals!!! I bet they blame this month’s slump on the Obama visit “distracting people from the property market”

How’s that Hope and Change working out for you now, limey wankers?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 13:55:12

Yeah, tell me about it. I e-mailed someone in Cornwall yesterday and they still haven’t responded.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-05-25 14:14:21

That`s correct. I was going to buy a house last month but because of the Royal Wedding, Easter and the fact that a decent house in a decent neighborhood still costs way too much I decided to wait.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 13:41:04

~ Clipped from The 5Min Forecast…

As long as we have housing on the brain, we see no sign of recovery in one of the nation’s worst-hit markets for home-builders. The Southern Nevada Home Builders Association says closings on new construction could fall to as few as 4,000 this year — down from the 2006 peak of 35,000.

No doubt the Vegas housing market is still hurting because of overcapacity. But one home-builder appears to be doing gangbusters business…

The bailout era gets weird…

Habitat for Humanity Las Vegas ranks No. 3 on a list of rapidly growing charities ranked by Charity Navigator — the website that tracks what percentage of your donations actually help people, instead of going for overhead. Programs and services by Habitat’s Vegas division have grown 90% in the last three years.

So let’s see if we have this straight. The banks refuse to unload foreclosed houses because they don’t want to book a loss… and Habitat is building new houses for the people who’ve lost their homes to foreclosure. There’s no way a big glut in empty houses can’t form in this environment.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 15:00:22

A couple of years ago, I was one of the photographers for one of Habitat for Humanity Tucson’s big annual events. After I was done shooting this, that, and the other aspect of this event, I got to talking with one of the staffers. She asked me if I knew of anyone who was looking for a Habitat home.

I didn’t.

But her reason for asking me was quite interesting. Seems that prices had come down to the point where people who would have been interested in signing up and doing Habitat sweat equity hours could just buy a house. Not to mention the fact that the Habitat homeowner target market wasn’t feeling as job-secure as they had, say, back in 2004.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-05-25 13:59:28

“The nasty things that you think are coming always take longer to arrive than you think they will, but once they get here, they make up for their tardiness by being worse than you thought they’d be.”

-Richard Maybury

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 15:02:33

News from Tucson: Man shoots self during standoff, police say

From the story:

A man facing foreclosure triggered a six-hour SWAT standoff in a northwest Tucson neighborhood Tuesday. Police said it ended when he took his own life.

It started Tuesday morning when Pima County’s regional SWAT team and Marana Police were called to a home off of Cortaro Farms Road. Deputies were there to serve civil paperwork to Neil Francis McHugh, 65, who was being evicted for the foreclosure of his home.

“This was not a surprise visit. Mr. McHugh knew his home was being foreclosed and that the deputy was going to serve paperwork to him that morning,” Marana Police Sgt. Tim Burnenkant told KGUN9 News.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-05-25 15:45:32

It is breathtaking to witness how much energy people waste on things…

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 15:15:45

Krugman apparently overlooked the potential for “Ghosts of Bubbles Past” when he opined that the Fed had run out of bubbles.

Technology
Ghosts of Bubbles Past Make Their Return
By Matt Egan
Published May 25, 2011 | FOXBusiness

Whether the gravity-defying price explosion was taking place in tech stocks, real estate or commodities, the bubbles of recent past all carried similar warning signs that signaled the party would soon be coming to a screeching halt.

These common threads included justifying surging prices by ignoring traditional metrics, a false belief that prices would always rise and overestimating the potential of new technologies that connect people.

Watch for these clues in the mushrooming social-networking space as some believe last week’s shocking $9 billion LinkedIn IPO signals another bubble is brewing in the tech world.

“People do lose their heads,” said Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst at the Oil Price Information Service. “There’s that herd mentality and there’s always this tremendous bullish bias, regardless if we’re talking about Internet stocks, commodities or housing.”

Shelter as Securities?

The U.S. economy is still attempting to recover from the bursting of the incredible housing bubble, which was created by a flood of credit, a belief prices would never fall and fraud in the financial industry.

At the peak of the bubble, the hottest markets like Las Vegas and Miami were enjoying ridiculous price increases of 3% to 5% a month.

“Houses became almost like securities,” said Richard Sylla, an economics professor and financial historian at NYU. “The places were not even built yet and people were buying them and selling them before construction even started.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-05-25 15:39:37

Watch for these clues in the mushrooming social-networking space as some believe last week’s shocking $9 billion LinkedIn IPO signals another bubble is brewing in the tech world.

I’m of the mind that the opening price of this IPO is yet another one of the many signs that LinkedIn is overvalued. Yes, it does derive quite a bit of its income from corporate headhunters, who pay to have access to the site. And, yes, it does have advertising revenue.

Now, let’s get down to the brass tacks: LinkedIn memberships. I would venture to guess that the HBB-er population of LinkedIn members isn’t paying any sort of membership fee. (I’m not!) And I’ll also go out on a limb by saying that most LinkedIn members aren’t paying either.

Why might that be? Well, here I go, walking further out onto that aforementioned limb. It may be due to the notion of value.

As in, the free membership folks don’t see any value in LinkedIn. If they’re on the business owning/entrepreneurial side of the fence, they’re not finding customers. Or, if they’re in employee mode, they’re not finding the job/career leads that they were hoping for.

Look for the air to start hissing out of the social media hype-bubble real soon, people.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-05-25 17:49:49

What’s crazy is that LinkedIn makes what, $15MM per year?

What’s the Zynga IPO going to look like? They are projected to make something like $600MM this year…

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-05-25 17:36:42

Something is messed up with my mail.com account. I haven’t been getting emails from anyone! Argh!

HBB braintrust, what is a reliable, SIMPLE email provider? I would use pine again if I could! I refuse to use gmail.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 19:33:54

Gmail

Best spam filter on the planet as well.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-05-25 19:35:32

Sorry, but they can’t be beat.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-05-25 20:57:25

Maybe storm shelter construction can occupy Midwest construction workers for the time being, as demand for housing adjusts to the Baby Boomer retirement era.

Storms Create a Scramble to Install Shelters
Joe Songer/THE BIRMINGHAM NEWS, via Associated Press
Danny Cole, at left, helped his girlfriend, Teresa Fugate, out of a shelter in the town of Phil Campbell, Ala., early this month.
By KIM SEVERSON
Published: May 25, 2011

ATLANTA — Gloria Jones climbed out of a relative’s storm shelter in an Oklahoma City suburb on Wednesday night and saw only rubble where the house used to be.

A shelter in Piedmont, Okla., northwest of Oklahoma City, where deadly storms struck Tuesday.

Eight people and two dogs had packed into that shelter, dodging a tornado that killed at least 10 people.

As soon as she gets over the shock of the disaster and helps her neighbors get back on their feet, she will order a shelter for her own house.

“I won’t go through that again without one,” she said. “It saved our lives.”

She, like thousands of others, is joining a storm shelter gold rush.

What is on track to be the deadliest tornado season in the nation’s history has prompted record-breaking sales for companies that sell safe rooms and shelters designed to withstand the powerful storms that have killed hundreds of people this spring.

From Minnesota to Texas — and especially in the tornado-ravaged South and Midwest — people are begging installers to get to their houses as soon as possible.

“We are having such a bad season that people say, ‘I thought about it for two years and put it off, but now I really need to get one,’ ” said Alisa Smith, director of sales for the Arkansas branch of Family Safe Shelter. Her company is scrambling to install more than 40 shelters a day around the country.

“Everybody would like to have one, and they want them yesterday,” she said.

But only in select cases are people required to build them. Government regulations mandating storm shelters, either public or private, are inconsistent. There are some regulations for apartment buildings, and some states, like Minnesota and Kansas, require that shelters be built near mobile home parks. Many areas, like Williamson County in Illinois, commandeer churches or schools to serve as voluntary shelters.

Alabama passed a law this year that requires shelters to be built into new schools. But cities do not require residents to build their own storm shelters.

“People in Alabama get very sensitive when you start to talk about government mandating certain things,” said William Bell, the mayor of Birmingham, which was hit with a deadly storm in April. “If you are going to put a mandate on people, how are you going to help them pay for it?”

When a tornado or hurricane is coming, people are largely on their own.

Perhaps less than 3 percent of the homes in the United States have storm shelters, said Ernst Kiesling, a professor of civil engineering at Texas Tech University and executive director of the National Storm Shelter Association.

The group began in 2000 as a way to increase the number of storm shelters in the country and improve industry standards. While some municipal building codes outline what constitutes a proper safe room or shelter, the field is largely unregulated.

A shelter can cost from about $3,000 for a concrete bunker to tens of thousands of dollars for elaborate steel rooms. A good one should have at least three deadbolts on the doors and walls that can withstand a piece of debris slamming into it at 100 miles per hour. It needs to be anchored to concrete pads, or, if buried underground, designed not to collapse when air pressure changes, according to the shelter association.

Not all of those on the market meet those standards, Dr. Kiesling said. Some are little more than septic tanks rigged to accommodate people, or use materials so flimsy the doors could be ripped off in a high wind.

“Almost anyone can start up a shelter business and build shelters,” he said.

Although the value of the storm cellar has long been recognized among rural Americans, the above-ground shelter has been around for about 30 years, said Dr. Kiesling, although the interest in storm shelters began to rise only recently.

For more than a decade, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has encouraged states to use disaster relief money to help homeowners and cities offset the cost of installing storm shelters. The program will pay up to 75 percent of the cost of approved shelters.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post