June 7, 2011

Bits Bucket for June 7, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

385 Comments »

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-07 05:02:59

Realtors Are Liars

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 05:13:32

Love the NAR.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-06-07 05:22:54

I will go down with you in the Realtor slander witch hunt.

I agree, Realtors Are Liars. And they got their business model from Pimps.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-06-07 05:43:10

Kramer the Realtor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_zKCUG20xs - 108k -

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 10:00:04

You know, it would have been funny to see Kramer trying to be a Realtor. He never was good at lying to people’s faces.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ahansen
2011-06-07 11:45:45

Because realtors are slyer.

 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 05:49:55

Yeah, but the NAR is the taxpayer’s best friend. Their lies convince Dumb Money to commit what money they have (and what money they can borrow) to The System, and it is this Dumb Money that helps keep the system going.

Somebody has to pay, better it be the Debt Equals Wealth crowd than the rest of us.

Love the NAR; The NAR is using their dues (bless their hearts) to convince FBs and potential FBs to sacrifice all their Dumb Money.

And when all their Dumb Money has been sacrificed and is no longer available to the dummys then the only money that will be left will be money that is in smarter hands. And it is this Smart Money that will reset the distortions to the economy that the Dumb Money caused.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 06:50:52

Prices are set on the margin. Those who refuse to pay too much do not impact market prices right away, because they are not participating in transactions. The supply of Fools must be exhausted, because their transactions set market price. As long as Fools want the illusion, Realtors, Used Car Salesmen, Pimps and Presidential Candidates are required.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 07:00:08

“The supply of Fools must be exhausted, because their transations set market price.”

The supply of MONEY that these Fools can get their foolish hands on must be exhausted.

It’s not the number of Fools, it’s the amount of Foolish Money. Take the money away from the Fools and the Fools will still be about, they will just be a bit poorer.

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-06-07 08:31:36

It would appear to the outside observer that the whole purpose and focus of the Federal Government is keeping money available to all the fools.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-06-07 12:01:52

“The supply of MONEY that these Fools can get their foolish hands on must be exhausted.”

It is the NY Fed Reserve’s special purpose to make sure this never happens. And If the music does stop, I think a lot of Americans will have bigger concerns than the “dream” of home ownership.

 
 
 
 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 06:53:19

Buy now or be priced out forever.

If you don’t buy now you will never get in.

Buy the home and then in 2 years you can refinance to a better loan.

Prices will continue to go up 15% a year

We expect a “soft landing”

Don’t worry about affordability the house will take care of the payments.

In 5 years you will not be able to buy a shack in California for under a million.

We have reached a “high plateau”

Gosh this is fun. I cannot think of any others, but this is all garbage I heard or read in the media, just off the top of my head. No slander here at all!

Comment by Kim
2011-06-07 07:39:04

Don’t forget:

“You won’t be throwing your money away on rent”

“You can paint the walls any color you want”

“You’ll be locked into a good school system”

and the biggie… “You’ll get a great big tax deuction for the mortgage interest and property taxes”

Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-06-07 15:44:37

I like the one where people have to pay $800,000 to get an ocean view 2 bedroom 2 bath condo on the Esplanade in RB because they don’t want to pay the “expensive” air conditioning bills of a $200,000 Phoenix stucco box! LOL.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 07:49:36

Quit making the landlord rich.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 10:35:25

It’s time for you to be a good husband and buy a house for your wife. It’s what she wants and needs.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-06-07 15:45:53

“Men, buy a house, get a trophy wife!” - NAR

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-07 15:58:54

…and then lose everything at the same time!

 
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2011-06-07 22:14:18

My favorite:

“I have three other bidders on this property. Is this your best offer?”

 
 
 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-06-07 05:04:24

From yesterday’s UK Guardian (and linked from Drudge):

“Let me put an alternative hypothesis. America in 2011 is Rome in 200AD or Britain on the eve of the first world war: an empire at the zenith of its power but with cracks beginning to show.

The experience of both Rome and Britain suggests that it is hard to stop the rot once it has set in, so here are the a few of the warning signs of trouble ahead: military overstretch, a widening gulf between rich and poor, a hollowed-out economy, citizens using debt to live beyond their means, and once-effective policies no longer working. The high levels of violent crime, epidemic of obesity, addiction to pornography and excessive use of energy may be telling us something: the US is in an advanced state of cultural decadence.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/06/us-economy-decline-recovery-challenges

Comment by jimbolio
2011-06-07 05:27:31

addiction to pornography and excessive use of energy ….

The jokes write themselves sometimes…haha

Comment by GH
2011-06-07 06:56:33

Yeah, don’t worry about the debt, it is the “porn” and energy use…

That said, we are in pretty poor shape as a nation and as a world economically, although there do seem to be countries which have avoided debt and even built up cash and gold…

 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 10:04:05

It’s not an addiction! I can stop any time I want! It just so happens “any time I want” is about 10 minutes after I start.

*insert joke about rinse, repeat*

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-06-07 12:33:28

Hah!

Though I have to ask what the enjoyment of two-dimensional sex has to do with the downfall of society? A lot of people read, too. And post to blogs. I daresay some even get ahem, enjoyment out of it.

 
 
Comment by dude
2011-06-07 05:57:25

So we only have 200 years before our empire gets sacks by the barbarians?

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2011-06-07 06:23:56

It’ll be interesting to see whether the timeline is accelerated this time because of improvements in communications.

Comment by dude
2011-06-07 22:11:21

No doubt true that. Things move much faster now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 06:29:36

Note that the elite of the Roman Empire simply switched their status from top members of the soon-to-collapse government, to top members of the still-rich-and-powerful church, which went on to rule the barbarians in its own way.

Will our elite attempt something similar?

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 06:52:49

If you define modern religion a certain way, it is already evident.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 06:57:57

Massive multinational corporations could define things instead of country borders? To some degree borders mean a lot less than they used to.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 07:02:09

Thats what my biz school profs said.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 07:24:33

“Massive multinational corporations could define things instead of country borders?”

Substitute ‘Roman Catholic Church’ or for ‘multinational corporations’ and that’s more or less what happened in Europe during the Middle Ages. And Islam did the same in the Middle East, during the same period.

Back to the future?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 07:44:41

The Ten Commandments of the Church of Free Market Corporatism

1. There shall be no borders.
2. There shall be no taxes on corporations.
3. There shall be no capital gains taxes.
4. There shall be no public health care.
5. There shall be no Social Security.
6. There shall be no crimes that cannot be forgiven by the
paying of a fine.
7. Hotel maids are there for the taking.
8. There shall be no environmental regulation.
9. There shall be no financial regulation that does not
benefit the Church.
10. ?

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 07:52:43

So where is all of the violent crime at?

Murder rates are at all time lows.

 
Comment by Doug in Boone, NC
2011-06-07 08:58:59

“Murder rates are at all time lows.”
Official murder rates don’t mean a whole lot, since most murders are gang, drug, and/or alcohol related, committed by low-life people who know each other.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:15:35

Official murder rates don’t mean a whole lot, since most murders are gang, drug, and/or alcohol related, committed by low-life people who know each other.

Thus spake a local police officer at a presentation that I attended. In essence, if you’re not involved in gangs, drugs, or excessive alcohol consumption, it’s unlikely that you’ll show up in the Tucson murder statistics.

All the more reason to keep one’s nose clean.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 09:40:54

Or in the crossfire.

 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 10:07:45

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/123240308.html

Family on the way home from a baby shower had their infant shot to death by gang-bangers who apparently need glasses.

 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 10:10:30

So, my link is caught up in link purgatory, but this is close to where I live :
(On NBC Bay Area)

East Palo Alto police appear to have made quick work in the homicide investigation that left a two month old infant dead and his parents seriously injured.

The shooting happened early Sunday morning.

Police said they arrested one juvenile they said is responsible for the crime early Monday morning. Investigators said two teens were taken into custody during the investigation of the triple shooting. One of those teens is a suspect in the shooting. The second man was arrested on a weapons charge. They said the second man was also a “person of interest” in the weekend shooting, but would not call him a suspect. Both were taken to juvenile hall in San Mateo County following a 5 a.m. arrest.

Police held a noon press conference where they announced the details in the investigation. The mother of infant attended that press conference.

The infant and his parents were shot while leaving a baby shower in the 400 block of Wisteria Drive at about 12:50 a.m., acting Capt. Jeff Liu said. Lui said they jumped in their car immediately after the shooting and raced toward a hospital. A police officer pulled them over on University Avenue in Palo Alto for speeding and discovered the family in distress. They rushed the three shooting victims to Stanford hospital, but doctors could not save the baby.

Police said there was also a three-year-old in the car who was not harmed.

Acting police Captain Jeff Liu talked about the motive behind the shooting during the Monday news conference. Liu said that the suspect was attacked in Redwood City on May 31 by a member Sureno gang. Lui said the suspect thought the person who attacked him was at the party in East Palo Alto.

“Our investigation tells us that the suspect that we’ve arrested saw two individuals on Wisteria he believed to have participated in the crime in Redwood City,” Liu said.

Liu said police believe the teen and his cohort armed themselves and opened fire on their car.
Liu said the shooter was mistaken and shot the wrong person making the triple shooting an apparent case of mistaken identity. The family who was hit is from Redwood City, but police said they were not part of any attack at the end of May.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-06-07 11:10:27

“while leaving a baby shower… at about 12:50 a.m.”?

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-07 11:18:38

“10. ?”

There shall be no education for poor or middle class kids.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 11:22:26

“while leaving a baby shower… at about 12:50 a.m.”?

I also found that a bit jarring. I’m wondering if the baby shower morphed into a bacchanalia for the adults.

I’ve seen that happen around here among, ahem, a certain ethnic community that hails from South of the Border. Occasions like first birthday parties, christenings, graduations, etc., turn into giant drinking bashes.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-06-07 12:05:27

“a certain ethnic community that hails from South of the Border”

We’re taking about Kiwis, right? :)

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-06-07 12:27:19

Hey I’m Irish and drinking and violence (Southie in the 80s) sounds pretty familiar in certain circles. My family is from the southern part of Ireland. Is that what you meant Slim? Or maybe you did mean South Boston? ; )

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 12:52:21

Of course, it’s not murder if you are a cop:

Arizona SWAT Team Defends Shooting Iraq Vet 60 Times

A Tucson, Ariz., SWAT team defends shooting an Iraq War veteran 60 times during a drug raid, although it declines to say whether it found any drugs in the house and has had to retract its claim that the veteran shot first.

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-06-07 15:51:58

Been a nerd all my life. When my older sister was enjoying the punk era of the late 70s / early 80s I would stay home. I lived in a lower class neighborhood with stabbings and shootings anyway (thanks section 8). I figured if I stay out too late past 10pm gallavanting, I would get into some trouble. Well my sister did not get into trouble, but … that was one example.

A guy I went to high school with was beaten up by kids high on PCP a year after graduating.

I don’t really feel I missed out on anything. I never much cared for the culture of the punks back in those days anyway. Certainly not disco either.

 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 16:26:22

Arizona SWAT Team Defends Shooting Iraq Vet 60 Times

Dude, vets are tough! They’re not gonna sit down and cry if you wing ‘em once or twice!

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 20:14:40

“There shall be no education for poor or middle class kids.”

We’re sorry. The 10th Commandment is currently open for bidding. Please enter your bid amount, along with your commandment suggestion.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 20:18:43

“I lived in a lower class neighborhood with stabbings and shootings anyway (thanks section 8).”

And if there was no section 8, there would have been no stabbings and shootings? Did section 8 cause them to be low lifes? The section 8 folks would have lived somewhere. Probably pretty close to your neighborhood.

 
 
Comment by seen it all
2011-06-07 08:14:21

I believe the Roman patricians, wenta nd founded acity state beyond the reach of teh Barbarians, they named it Venetzia and it remained independent until Napoleon conquered it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 09:14:23

I believe they called it England.

 
Comment by leosdad
2011-06-07 10:16:07

That’s a bit a stretch. The Venicians were the locals there and they were on their own after Rome couldn’t protect the anymore.
But they turned the disadvantage of location into an advantage: the lagoon was too deep for (horse) mounted attackers (for instance the Huns) to get through and too shallow for bigger ships to navigate. That situation saved Venice for a long, long time.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 10:35:28

“That situation saved Venice for a long, long time.”

Location, location, location! :wink:

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 11:03:33

They were also experts at deploying the Venetian Blind.

 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 16:27:30

Which is deployed immediately following a Venetian Moon.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Natalie
2011-06-07 06:27:27

I don’t remember a peaceful, thin, non-sex obsessed society, that only used what energy they needed. Whoever wrote this has no concept of history. If they bothered to do any research at all, they would have discovered that this is probably the most tolerant and crime free period that ever existed. As far as energy consumption and porn, people have always used what they had access to and will continue to do so. Sex and comfort and two of the few forms of pleasure available to us. Most of the violence right now is simulated. As for civil rights abuses, again statistics do not show a deviation from the mean on the upside.

Comment by Natalie
2011-06-07 06:36:34

comfort and two = comfort are two

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-07 07:23:37

I think you’re spot on Natalie. The notion advanced by the creepy religious authorities that we’re in “cultural decline” is hogwash. Take the gay community for instance…. they’ve been around since the beginning of time and they’ll be here long after we’re gone. If you ask one of the religious creeps posing as an authority, they’ll tell you the gays are taking over the world.

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 07:53:47

Well to be fair, a lot if the religious creeps are gay.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 07:56:52

Oh, come on now. Surely it’s just a coincidence that a long chain of loud-mouthed anti-gay priests and preachers have been caught assuming a wide stance with other men- and boys.

 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:18:13

I don’t remember a peaceful, thin, non-sex obsessed society, that only used what energy they needed. Whoever wrote this has no concept of history. If they bothered to do any research at all, they would have discovered that this is probably the most tolerant and crime free period that ever existed.

Not long ago, I read about American colonial history. Sorry, but the title escapes me, but the book started with a description of the very prim and proper John Adams walking over to the Pennsylvania State House. (That building went on to be called Independence Hall.)

En route to the State House, Adams passed by numerous taverns, many more than exist in modern-day Philadelphia. Not to mention ladies of the night, who were all over the streets, seeking customers.

By comparison, modern American life seems quite Puritan.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 10:13:29

And with fewer piles of horse sh*t. Except, of course, at the capitol, where they are in champers preparing for a vote. (Or busy ‘lobbying’ the elected piles at the behest of the piles that run the giant companies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2011-06-07 07:06:34

I stopped doing all eBay transactions with the UK because everyone it appears is a liar and a thief.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-07 08:17:15

Haven’t done business with anyone online from the UK in quite a while.

Having said that, I am always contemptuous of UK commentary on the US. IMO, the UK has long manipulated the US from behind the scenes, hiding behind its big skirts. For a country that supposedly declared its freedom from the UK, we’ve gotten dragged into a lot of crap over the centuries on its behalf: Middle East, Israel, a couple of World Wars, etc. Not to mention being a sort of escape valve for their Indian and Pakistani immigrants.

If you read anything on line about the immigration situation in the UK, it blows major chunks. Worse than here, if that’s possible.

Comment by whyoung
2011-06-07 09:49:47

I think Europeans in general (and perhaps especially the UK) are very conflicted about us. They dislike having needed us militarily and economically and while they seem to like us paying for things don’t like the place in the world that gave us (for a while at least).

Also, I think they have a hard time coming to terms with the fact that in many ways we ARE them in a slightly different evolved form, so we can’t be completely dismissed as “the other”. It’s easy to be a bit resentful of the “black sheep” relatives that go off and become make something of themselves you never dreamed of, especially if they have to save your bacon a few times.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by frankie
2011-06-07 08:34:51

Charmed, I’m sure.

I’m aware of people who have the same opinion of ebayers in the United States. I suspect the issue may be more to do with the clientele of ebay; rather then the general population of the UK.

That of course is not to say the population of the UK are saints, of liars and fools we have more than our fair share; but that unfortunately seems to be the case of the world in general.

Comment by rms
2011-06-07 11:33:07

FWIW, I have had positive eBay results from China, western Europe, Israel, Japan and Taiwan; not quite sure what is wrong there in the UK.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 16:00:00

Perfidious Albion?

I lived in England for a while, and was only ripped off by one person- my employer, at the end of my employment (skrewed me on the final payment). Other than that, they seemed about average trustworthy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 12:45:26

PPl have been saying that about us ever since day 1. They’re jealous.

I’m telling u, we need tariffs to solve all this.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:06:56

We should bring our jobs back first.

Republicans block ending offshore jobs tax breaks | Reuters

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68R40I20100928

 
Comment by frankie
2011-06-07 14:07:41

I would not take the Guardian as repetitive of people in the UK; the Guardian speaks for the Guardian readership (a small but vocal minority of a minority). In many way the UK is a reflection of the US; we abandoned the manufacture of goods and believe we could get rich selling houses and dodgy financial products to the world. This fallacy has had a devastating effect on much of Europe, but not all; I would suggest the German Economy is one many other countries could learn from and try to emulate.

We could argue why countries have become involved in wars, but to be blunt it probably occurred because the leaders of those countries wished too or miscalculated their actions and what they would lead too. For example there is an argument that the American Trade Embargo of Japan lead to the USA’s entry into the Second World War

http://faroutliers.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/effect-of-economic-sanctions-on-japan-1941/

As to people being jealous and envious of the US, it a basic instinct of people when they encounter people or countries more successful than themselves to be so; I suspect the time to worry is when they are no longer envious of you

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 14:15:34

I would suggest the German Economy is one many other countries could learn from and try to emulate.

Funny you should mention Germany. Because Angele Merkel is making an official visit to Washington, DC. Wouldn’t you just love to be a fly on the wall as she schools Obama on such things as:

1. Having an industrial policy.
2. Providing apprenticeship and trade training for kids who aren’t college-bound.
3. Making the transition from fossil fuels to solar energy.
4. Doing one’s work with attention to quality. They don’t call it German engineering for nothing.

I could go on, but you get the point.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 04:27:25

+1, Slim

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by liz pendens
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 13:42:09

Oh, I was wondering why Fannie Mae over-reported the price I paid for one of their houses. Now I know.

Comment by bink
2011-06-07 15:46:31

How many Fannie Mae houses have you bought?

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:15:39

Wow. It just never ends, does, it?

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-06-07 05:42:51

Well, that and “hope and change” means that once they graduate they go home to live in the parent’s basement with $50,000 of debt and no job…

———————-

Obama Losing The Youth Vote ‘Because White Students Don’t Think He’s Cool Anymore’
Daily Mail (UK) | June 06, 2011 | PAUL BENTLEY

President Barack Obama famously won the 2008 election on a wave of support from America’s youth. But any hopes the 49-year-old had of keeping down with the kids appear to have faded - his support from young people is rapidly waning, a poll has found. And for a man known for his ‘jacket off’ casual style the reason for this slump may be particularly hurtful - students are abandoning the President because they do not think he is cool anymore, it has been claimed.

Back then: In 2008, students voted for Obama because they ‘thought he was cool’ According to the National Journal’s Ronald Brownstein report, President Obama has dramatically lost support from young people - and particularly young white people - in America since 2008. His approval rating among those aged 18 to 29 is currently at 56 per cent - a huge fall of ten points since the 2008 exit polls.

And this comes in stark contrast to Obama’s general approval rating levels, which are pretty consistent with those of 2008. The reason for this sudden drop is because students, who rushed behind the Obama campaign in 2008, no longer think he is cool, according to those at Oberlin College, which is known for its hipster left-wing activism.

Comment by Montana
2011-06-07 05:54:28

Back then: In 2008, students voted for Obama because they ‘thought he was cool’

not a few Boomers as well.

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 06:01:01

As for me, I thought we were going to get Volcker along with Obama. When I voted for Obama I was really voting for Volcker.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2011-06-07 06:26:54

I didn’t fall for it. Every liberal Democrat has a conservative or two hanging around somewhere on the periphery, to give the broader populace something to latch on to.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 06:52:15

“Every liberal Democrat has a conservative or two hanging around somewhere on the periphery”

Maybe. Except that Volcker is a Democrat.

VOLCKER OUT AFTER 8 YEARS AS FEDERAL RESERVE CHIEF; REAGAN CHOOSES GREENSPAN
By ROBERT D. HERSHEY Jr., Special to the New York Times
Published: June 03, 1987

President Reagan brought to a close today Paul A. Volcker’s stewardship as one of the most powerful economic policymakers in the nation’s history, nominating Alan Greenspan to succeed him as chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.

The main philosophical difference between Mr. Volcker, a Democrat, and Mr. Greenspan, a Republican, appears to be in their views of the structure and regulation of the banking system. Mr. Volcker has tended to resist deregulation of banks while Mr. Greenspan is more favorably disposed to it.

 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 07:01:22

Not a popular belief, but our current economic problems are indeed the end result 25 years later of Regan policies, specifically his desire to deregulate big business.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 08:02:11

“Mr. Volcker has tended to resist deregulation of banks while Mr. Greenspan is more favorably disposed to it.”

Kinda like: ‘Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor today. Seen as slightly less sympathetic towards minority rights than his predecessor…’

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2011-06-07 11:55:31

There are conservative Democrats, alpha. And the significant difference between Volcker and Greenscam has nothing to do with your fetish about regulation. It’s sound money vs. easy money, plain and simple.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 14:28:36

“It’s sound money vs. easy money, plain and simple.”

Sound money requires a sound economic system at its base, which is achieved through proper regulation, and destroyed by the lack of proper regulation. As we have just seen.

The US dollar became the world’s reserve currency under FDR’s reforms. We’re losing that status after having relaxed FDR’s reforms.

Yes, I do have a fetish about there being a rule of law that extends even unto the wealthy elite. Call me a sicko if you must, but I bet Volcker agrees with me on this. In fact, even old Greenie has discovered the wrongness of his free-love economic system for the elite. They cheated on him. Big time.

 
 
Comment by CrackerBob
2011-06-07 06:46:17

I too thought that. I guess it does not matter, Dem or Rep, they all waste boatloads of cash buying votes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 04:37:20

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 06:01:01
As for me, I thought we were going to get Volcker along with Obama. When I voted for Obama I was really voting for Volcker.

—————–

Yes, this was definitely a consideration when I voted for Obama. He sold himself as the guy who was going to put all this financial fraud behind us…as someone who was against “fat cat bankers,” and who was for “the working man.” Shows what fools we were for believing him.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 09:46:52

“Back then: In 2008, students voted for Obama because they ‘thought he was cool’

not a few Boomers as well.”

Cool had nothing to do with my vote. The prospect of McCain-Palin was enough.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 10:11:24

Same here.

And, on a personal note, one of my neighbors worked at American Continental during the 1980s. That was one of Charles Keating’s companies.

Reflecting that experience, my neighbor said, “I knew what kind of a crook he was.” In the previous sentence, the word “he” is referring to the current senior Senator from Arizona, John McCain.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 06:09:45

Does anyone find it disturbing that young people vote for someone because he’s “cool?” Can’t the college-educated future of our country articulate their views with a little more thought or vocabulary?

I was in the middle of writing a longer post on another topic and gave up. It takes too long to explain and all I get is a non-specific talking point in return. Why bother.

Comment by Montana
2011-06-07 06:22:35

Yes.

 
Comment by Natalie
2011-06-07 06:33:35

Obama went after childen and minorities for votes because they are easy to manipulate. Most well educated people with a little life experience could see through his bs, even Democrats that wanted so badly to find something decent to find in him.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-07 06:37:22

I was not impressed with the alternative, either. So I voted third party.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Natalie
2011-06-07 06:41:17

Yes. I did not mean to imply that either choice was acceptable. I refrained to vote because I didnt want the guilt associated with knowing I voted for either one of them. It is time we start demanding something a little better from both parties.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 09:48:48

“It is time we start demanding something a little better from both parties.”

Move to Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina.

 
Comment by polly
2011-06-07 11:05:24

I knew that I would perfer the supreme court justices he would appoint over the ones McCain would appoint and that was more than enough to make a decision and cast a vote even if there had been no other issues.

 
Comment by jbunniii
2011-06-07 13:56:35

Move to Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina.

Another terrible aspect of the two-party system. Three otherwise irrelevant states have a disproportionate impact on which candidates the rest of us get to choose from.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 14:42:30

“I knew that I would prefer the supreme court justices he would appoint over the ones McCain would appoint and that was more than enough to make a decision and cast a vote even if there had been no other issues.”

Exactly. And the decisions made since the election by the current Supreme Court have confirmed this.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 21:00:42

“Move to Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina.

Another terrible aspect of the two-party system. Three otherwise irrelevant states have a disproportionate impact on which candidates the rest of us get to choose from.”

If we had all presidential primaries on the same day, the small states would have no voice at all and the candidates would never go there. They would concentrate their campaigns in the largest states.

Maybe we should try an open primary with the top two from each state qualifying for the November ballot in all states. Ron Paul could campaign exclusively in a small state for the primary and be on the ballot in all states in the general election. At least each state’s primary would be an interesting race.

 
 
Comment by michael
2011-06-07 07:00:50

Yes I Can!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 07:07:49

This looks like the problem shaping up in the next election. So far the R’s have not put forward a worthy candidate, which means again we will have to pick the dog with the least fleas.

I actually think things are best when the Senate and Congress are the opposing party to the Whitehouse, so I am fine with O getting reelected so long as the Senate is taken by the R’s, which I am pretty sure it will be.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 08:18:44

“Worthy Candidate”

We haven’t had one of those since Eisenhower.

 
Comment by whyoung
2011-06-07 09:19:10

“Worthy Candidate”

We haven’t had one of those since Eisenhower.

___________

Someday before I die I’d love to have the experience of voting “for” someone (in a state or national election), instead of whoever scares/repels me the least.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 09:48:42

Heck, I’m just waiting for the first time (in a couple of generations) for one of our political hacks to actually tell a group of core supporters to go pound sand, and do what’s right for the country, instead of what’s right for the base.

See Eisenhower ending the Korean War, Nixon going to China. Johnson and Civil Rights.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 10:57:26

One could argue that Obama did that in his health care bill. He told the lefty liberals to go pound sand on single-payer and the public option, while he went and made closed-door deals with Big Pharma and Republicans. He knew that he had to pass some form of healthcare just so that there was something available to the jobless, and to stop the denials for preconditions and cover children udner 26 — that is, the most egregious lapses in the uninsured. And he had to do it before the lobbysists and Republicans could muster enough opposition to kill health care entirely. Even then it was a near thing. Obama’s deals caused an incredible amount of anger on the left, and, coupled with enthusiasm from the teabags, was a direct cause of the loss of the House to the Rebublicans in 2010.

Soon after, Obama told his lefties to again go pound sand when he made that “tax deal” with the Republicans to extend the Bush tax cuts for another two years. Obama knew full well that the rich would get away with a lot of loot, but he did it to support the long-term unemployed, and to repeal dADT and to pass a nuclear arms treaty with Russia.

Now, were these things “good for the country?” I guess it’s debatable, but then I’m not sure that Nixon going to China worked out all that well in the end either. But there is no doubt that Obama defied his base for these laws.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 12:08:52

We finally recognized the fact that the PRC (and it’s billion plus people) existed.

A recognition of the obvious

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 17:31:06

Yeah, we were so grateful for their existance that we sent sent them five million jobs as a thank-you gift.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 21:04:55

“cover children udner 26 “

Interesting choice of words. A 25 year old has been legally an adult for 7 years.

 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 22:00:13

Not many jobs available to an 18 year old carry health insurance. Keep in mind if you want decent health insurance you are required to work as a W2 employee at a large employer. That is by law!

 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 06:36:14

“It takes too long to explain and all I get is a non-specific talking point in return.”

We are a nation that responds only to sound bites.

Because of that it is difficult to get a concept across to a listener.

Or to a reader.

First, each sound bite must be seperated from the concept you want to present.

Then the sound bite must be presented in its simplest form.

Otherwise the audience will tune out.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 07:05:58

In biz school we were taught to keep our written communications as brief as possible, otherwise the recipients(s) would tune it out. Apparrently its an American thing, and we were told that American execs often find their foreign counterparts to be “long winded”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 08:23:45

I’ve had to give presentations/reports at the CEO/CFO level. You get about 5 minutes in, and you start getting the “Glazed eye” look.

In their defense, they usually have a lot going on. Their philosophy is that they hired you to delegate this stuff to, so all they really want is a brief outline of their options, and what you recommend that they do.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 08:31:18

That’s what were were told in biz school, keep it brief and get to the point … fast, even if you have to gloss over important details. I guess it also means “Tell them what they want to hear”

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 10:02:42

That usually depends on the CEO.

I usually made two written reports, one with the “basics” that i used as a basis for my presentation, and another, more detailed report for review if anyone needed more info.

 
 
 
Comment by seen it all
2011-06-07 08:16:46

come on Oxy.

speak your piece!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:20:33

Does anyone find it disturbing that young people vote for someone because he’s “cool?”

ISTR a similar wave of youthful enthusiasm for JFK back in 1960. And for McGovern in 1972.

Comment by CrackerBob
2011-06-07 09:41:55

And it is interesting that old folks voted for Nixon, who as a Quaker, sat out the war while McGovern was a super-stud B-29 pilot who bombed the bejusus out of Germany.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jbunniii
2011-06-07 14:06:17

Or Clinton in 1992, for that matter. He was the first candidate to appear on MTV, if I recall correctly. Also he played saxophone on “The Arsenio Hall Show.” (There’s a name you don’t hear much anymore!)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 14:17:46

Also he played saxophone on “The Arsenio Hall Show.”

Harry Truman was a much better musician. (He played piano.)

And, if my reading of history is correct, Jefferson probably could have outdone them all in the music department.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-07 14:27:36

He was the first candidate to appear on MTV, if I recall correctly.

Boxers or briefs?

 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2011-06-07 09:37:00

Why bother with all that when everything the candidates tell you about themselves is a lie anyway? Might as well throw darts to decide.

 
Comment by Pete
2011-06-07 16:56:25

“Does anyone find it disturbing that young people vote for someone because he’s “cool?” ”

It’s just another version of the now media standard, “which candidate would you rather have a beer with?” And it wasn’t our youth they were asking.

Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 04:46:37

Sad, but true.

They sell us the “warm fuzzies,” instead of the cold, hard facts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2011-06-07 06:51:15

White Students Don’t Think He’s Cool Anymore’ ??

Lots of “white” students never thought he was cool to begin with particularly in some geographic locations in our country but they remain mostly irrelevant anyway…A majority of that group rarely vote anyway…To busy whining about somebody moving their cheese….They are perfect fodder for the Palin/Armey Hyperbole….

Comment by michael
2011-06-07 07:50:14

56% of white students still think he’s cool.

what percentage of black students thinks he isn’t?

Comment by scdave
2011-06-07 09:05:37

Is that you Eddie ??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2011-06-07 09:57:18

Nope

 
 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-06-07 20:53:09

I voted for O because the other options was ridiculous. Palin? !?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CrackerBob
2011-06-07 09:44:24

“Palin Hyperbole” or Palin Honeyhole?

Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 11:00:22

Based the one positive aspect of Palin, I vote for honeyhole…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-06-07 08:32:52

The Fonz was cool. Obama is a dork.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 09:42:04

If the coolness spectrum has the Fonz on one end and Obama on the other, I want to be towards the Obama end.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 10:19:56

I recall an old Happy Days episide where the Fonz is stomping for Eisenhower: “My Bike Likes Ike”. Richie is devastated when Stevenson loses.

Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-06-07 20:54:42

We voted for O as he is smart, and after Bush for 8 years, that is all we wanted.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 10:18:39

Maybe if he started using ebonics….

Comment by Pete
2011-06-07 17:05:06

“Maybe if he started using ebonics….”

Most probably won’t believe me, but if you go back to his campaign speeches and early post-election speeches, they are peppered with “yo”s here and there, in place of “you know”, or even the popular abbreviation “y’know”. It was only used as the first “word” in a sentence. Maybe some here remember this. I started listening closely when I first heard it, thinking either he goofed, or my hearing was messed up, but he often did it several times per speech. Backup, anyone?

Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 17:41:15

Sorry I’m late, but yes, Obama really ramped up the “Preacher mode” in some of hismore colorful campaign speeches, especially to his more colorful audiences.

Funny thing though, the preacher mode sounded a little forced, while the articulate well-spoken policy Obama sounded more natural. I guess he was only pretending to be an empty suit?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pete
2011-06-07 21:00:25

“Funny thing though, the preacher mode sounded a little forced, while the articulate well-spoken policy Obama sounded more natural.”

Yeah, but then he hit those three-point jumpers in front of the troops, which kept us confused just long enough.

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 17:47:55

Word to your mother.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2011-06-07 23:09:03

Yep. And Hillary did the same thing. Cadences and pronunciations sort of go with the flow for people who speak frequently and to many different audiences. It makes it easier for people to understand what you’re are saying.

For example, Bronx and Dallas. New Orleans and Tulsa. Holy Roller church and San Francisco dinner party. Almost two different languages.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 13:36:56

Yeah, kinda hard to get a job when you’re an American. Don’t you know Congress passed a law against that?

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:28:45

Exactly. See my post below.

And let’s not forget the United States Chamber of Commerce actually PAYING to train THOUSANDS of offshore workers to take our jobs.

(I really had to dig to find this. It’s been deliberately buried. Look at the date)

http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/soa_webservices/226500202?subSection=News

Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 16:14:49

That news would be unbelievable if I didn’t believe it. How can this be happening? I really think people need to know about this stuff. It’s awful.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 16:29:47

Because it has to be repeated over and over, but then other people get bored hearing it.

Ironic, no?

 
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 04:49:23

Nope, only idiots would get bored hearing it over and over.

Keep up the good work, eco!

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:23:31

When did Obama become a Republican?

Republicans block ending offshore jobs tax breaks | Reuters

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68R40I20100928

 
Comment by butters
2011-06-07 15:29:27

Of courese not if he appoints people like this.

Senate Confirms Former RIAA Lawyer for Solicitor General

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-06-07 15:56:07

But…But the 26 and under crowd get health coverage man!

 
 
Comment by dude
2011-06-07 05:55:57

We are recently returned from a week of vacation on Oahu. We previously had gone in ‘07. We stayed in a rented house on north shore both times.

The contrast was striking, the number of beachfront see through houses is astonishing. There are 7 rentals on the stretch of beach where we stayed just south of Laie and ours was the only one rented the week we were there. It was great for us but that can’t be very good for the owners.

I also noted that the Polynesian Cultural Center was running far under capacity, with many empty seats at both the luau and the night show, both of which were as good as ever. It was reminiscent of Disneyland on a rainy day in February.

We were in Honolulu on Saturday, which also mirrored our ‘07 experience and the reduced crowds were very noticeable. I filled my rental for $3.85/gallon, only one cent more than I pay at Sam’s in P’dale. My mini-van rental was only $45/day as well, about half what I paid in ‘07.

Despite all this the run down shacks on the beach are still listed at asking prices of nearly $1 million. It makes me wonder at what point the investors who own these will be overcome by carrying costs.

Anyway, that’s my report, FWIW.

Comment by 2banana
2011-06-07 06:10:08

Despite all this the run down shacks on the beach are still listed at asking prices of nearly $1 million. It makes me wonder at what point the investors who own these will be overcome by carrying costs.

What are the taxes on those run down shacks?

My guess - very high as Hawaii has some of the most lavish benefits/pensions for their public union “public servants”.

Property taxes are usually the largest chunk of carrying costs in public union controlled states.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 07:07:20

Why don’t you just look it up, instead of merely bloviating?

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 07:11:33

Just saying, as Texas has VERY high property taxes, and having hard data would be more useful than sound bites.

Anyway, I just took a looksie. For residential its anywhere from 0.3% to 0.9%.

In other words, very average, maybe even on low side.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mikeinbend
2011-06-07 08:16:29

I don’t envy Hawaii property owners, as a home valued at 1 mil (without protection from something like prop 13 in CA), means even a mill rate of 0.9% is 9k per year. And with vacancy rates fairly high, as Dude notes, how are the property owners making it without feeding the alligator from their own alligator skin wallets?

I know when I sold my home in Goleta, CA, never again would I own again in coastal CA, due to the property taxes alone. They went up from $300 per month for us to $1000 per month for the new owners.

As with Hawaii, gotta have plenty of $$ to own there and it does not appear to be changing very fast. Our suburban Santa Barbara street had illegal garage conversions lining the street; my home had one of the only permitted second units, a granny flat over the garage, which is why I bought it. That’s how folks were making it back then; collecting around 1k/month for their garages that were converted for maybe 5k. Pays good until someone complains; and it seemed that mostly nobody did as the units are still there after 1.5 decades.

But even high rents wont pay for astronomical tax bills along with other carrying costs. Sounds like deferred maintainance would be an issue there as it is in Goleta; photos from above our old neighborhood reveal ground Ivy covering most lots. Digging that stuff out is nearly impossible; we left ours in place for the duration of owning the home; the new owners dug it out(It WAS the fence with the neighbors, as the old fence had rotted away leaving the ivy as the new fence). Lets just say rat and possum heaven! I imagine Hawaii would be similar with lots of landscaping/window washing/vermin chasing required as well.

BTW, To actually permit the granny flat when I bought in 95, the old owners had to; install its own water meter (although never actually installed a seperate service line to the unit; that was not required oddly enough), provide an additional off street parking spot in order to get the permitting finalized which I made contingent on my purchase of the house. Probably explains why the meter was installed but no service line; cuz it was on the old owners dime.

Dude did you get to see Pipeline or any of the other famous breaks in action? I am heading to the OR coast today to teach a surfing lesson out there Wednesday. More for fun than money!

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-06-07 07:52:01

You are correct. Looks like Hawaii collects most of their taxes from income taxes. Property taxes are around the national average.

———————

Hawaii tax burden 5th highest in U.S.
August 8, 2008
The Maui News

HONOLULU - The tax burden for Hawaii residents is the fifth highest in the country when it comes to state and local levies.

Tax Foundation, a Washington-based group that monitors tax issues, has put out a new study, saying Hawaii residents will pay out an average of $4,920 in state and local taxes this year.

That figure represents nearly 11 percent of a person’s income.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 07:59:07

But, at least Hawaii has no sales tax.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 08:37:33

“That figure represents nearly 11 percent of a person’s income.”

I found a neat interactive map:

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/tax-burdens-by-state/

The national average appears to be in the nineish range (the map shows Hawaii at 10.6%)

 
Comment by chilidoggg
2011-06-07 09:46:46

The average of taxes paid last year by me and Bill Gates was over $100 million.

 
Comment by easthawaii
2011-06-07 13:38:17

There is a Hawaii sales tax and an excise tax and an income tax. I vacation rental my second bedroom/bath as a detached cottage (permitted and finaled). On this island, the excise tax (GET) + Transient Acommodations tax (TAT) totals 13.4166% on about $4000-5000 annual income on the cottage. You are taxed starting with the first dollar you make here. Airfare is high, no tourists. Last summer, when the MSM declared a recovery, it was much better. It would be nice if the 80% who have their jobs would take a vacation. Two houses in my oceanview subdivision (96778) that would have sold for 650k in 2005 (nothing sold in 2006-7) sold as shortsales for $215k and $275k in 2010. 1/2 acre houselots are around $80-100k. I don’t think they will go back down to $25k unless the lava flows through here. Houselots peaked at $190k. There are no foreclosures on the market in my small neighborhood.

 
 
 
 
Comment by bink
2011-06-07 16:03:21

The media here (Oahu) has been reporting a slight decrease in visitors, but the hotel occupancy rate is still very high. They say the number of Japanese visitors only dropped slightly after the tsunami. Those empty rentals are probably the result of people here overestimating their value. I had to look for rentals for my parents when they came for our wedding and the asking prices for vacation rentals are astronomical. That’s true for any place near a beach or considered “luxury.” People here have been able to postpone the bubble a bit longer, it seems. Not that prices aren’t dropping.

There are a million rental condos in Waikiki, studios and 1 bedrooms, for far less than the cost of a hotel. Maybe that’s the real way to judge the health of the market.

As others have said, the property tax rate here is actually very low, relatively speaking. I think a million dollar home pays around $200-300/month. The assessed values are well below the actual values. The income tax rate is extreme. IIRC it’s around 8-10%.

Btw, my landlord just got hit with a hefty bill. This “million dollar” property was built in the 70s. Apparently building codes back then didn’t require much more than a simple concrete pad, 2×2, to put your stilted house on. Now water is running beneath the house and eroding the dirt underneath these pads. Several stilts are now hanging loose, as they say.

Total bill for repairs is expected to be over $30k. That’s assuming they hire someone licensed to do such repairs. They won’t be turning a profit on their rental property this year.

 
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 04:56:41

Thanks for the report, dude. That’s the kind of info that makes the HBB so very valuable.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 05:56:00

Cash-strapped states look to roll back tax credits
By John Wisely, USA TODAY

Tough budget times are forcing state governments to rethink the tax breaks they grant.

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer overruled a vote to repeal several clean energy tax credits last May.

Michigan last week eliminated several tax credits, including those for small donations made to universities, food banks, museums and public television. The state also capped at $25 million a year the tax incentives it gives the film industry, which has been lured to the state since 2008 by some of the more generous incentives in the nation. The changes were part of a tax overhaul that Republican Gov. Rick Snyder says will spur job growth.

The Oklahoma Legislature has set up a special committee to review tax incentives there. A report from the Oklahoma Tax Commission in October 2010 listed the cost of hundreds of credits and incentives.

“It’s like a big Christmas tree,” says Larkin Warner, emeritus professor of economics at Oklahoma State University, who serves on the committee. “The legislators ought to take a hard look.”

Economists generally favor more uniform taxation but acknowledge that incentives can advance policy goals such as capital investment, cleaner energy use or job creation, says Dana Johnson, recently retired chief economist at Comerica Bank.

“Taxes can be used, just like direct subsidies, to (encourage) certain behavior,” Johnson says. “The question you always have to ask is: Is it worth the revenue?”

Comment by Montana
2011-06-07 06:25:29

we took the clean energy credit when we got a pellet stove, but then the price of pellets shot up so we haven’t used it in 3 years.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 10:21:47

Aren’t those pellets made out of leftover sawdust?

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 14:28:18

Interestingly, building collapsed around the time pellets shot up. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 10:33:42

“The changes were part of a tax overhaul that Republican Gov. Rick Snyder says will spur job growth.”

The new catch phrase. It is no longer “for the children”. Now it’s to “spur job growth”. No explanation of how that will work.

“universities, food banks, museums and public television … film industry”

Sounds like bastions of liberalism are on the chopping block. Not only will “conservatives” cut welfare and food stamps, but they will undermine support for food banks as well. Let them eat cake!

I get it now - with no social support system, the “leeches” will have to go out and get jobs. Silly me, I forgot. The reason so many people are out of work is that social programs undermine their incentive to work.

And if they can’t find a job, they should just start their own business. Ignore the fact that most new businesses fail in the first 5 years - many because they are undercapitalized. Ignore the fact that many of those who are out of work have now burned through all of their assets and are poor candidates for start up loans. Ignore the fact that the economy is weak and people and businesses are not spending as much.

Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 10:45:07

I get it now - with no social support system

You’re well aware that the private sector can - and does - provide such services. It has for centuries (millenia?). Government being the source of such services is a relatively recent development in the grand scheme of things.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 11:08:24

In this case, support for private social systems is being undermined as well. Most food banks are private, charity organizations. Removing deductions for contributions to food banks reduces the amount that is available to be donated.

And just how well did those charity organizations work in the past to provide for the needs of the indigent? Did they eliminate starvation? Did they house the homeless? I will have to look for it later - I read an article recently about missions in Los Angeles charging for overnight stays.

Were orphanages healthy places?

How well does charity provide for the indigent of Africa and Asia? When there are droughts and threats of mass starvation, governments provide a lot of the aid.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 12:06:37

Removing deductions for contributions to food banks reduces the amount that is available to be donated.

Read the article. It’s not about removing deductions. The state was crediting back 50% of the donated amount. That’s a very different beast - that’s the state (aka other taxpayers) making the contribution.

And just how well did those charity organizations work in the past to provide for the needs of the indigent?

I’d suggest you ask the same question of the effectiveness of government programs.

Did they eliminate starvation?

Clearly not. Is it something that can even be eliminated (I’d argue the answer is no, and that answer can be found by observing populations of animals in any environment). But here’s a question - has any ‘progressive’ governement?

Did they house the homeless?

Certainly

I read an article recently about missions in Los Angeles charging for overnight stays.

Yep, because they can’t afford to support all the indigent out there, and they felt they were simply teaching dependence.

How well does charity provide for the indigent of Africa and Asia?

Quite well. But the reality is that land simply can’t support the population. Starvation is nature’s means of addressing the imbalance. Any food we provide simply extends the problem, and results in even more population growth.

It’s great to think of a world with no starvation. But that can only happen if populations don’t increase when more food is available. In the ‘natural’ world, there’s a see-saw of population growth, then starvation. There’s no such thing as a “steady state”, but simply a constant undulation.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 12:45:47

The state was crediting back 50% of the donated amount. That’s a very different beast - that’s the state (aka other taxpayers) making the contribution.

We had a discussion about this. So a tax credit counts as “government spending,” but a tax deduction does not? Nope. They are not a different beast at all: the only difference is in the amount; the net result is exactly the same.

And I thought that eliminating a tax credit was the same thing as raising taxes, right? I thought that was a bad thing. So why are you supporting it?

And on another note, government programs work JUST FINE as long as they don’t enlist the “help” of private sector in a public-private partnership.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 13:00:02

oxide - thanks for reminding me why I don’t read your posts.

Again, you construct and attack a strawman and ignore the actual content of my comment.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 17:16:37

“It’s not about removing deductions. The state was crediting back 50% of the donated amount.”

Thanks for the correction regarding deduction vs. credit. Credit has more impact on taxes collected, but other than that, they have a similar effect.

As I see it, this is a credit that pushes decision making to the taxpayers. I would think you would favor that. Instead of the government deciding which programs to support, small contributors get to choose. It appears to be quite democratic (small D) and small government.

The article does not state whether contributions to any other non-profits will be credited, but I would favor expanding it to include religious organizations like local churches and any other non-profit, as long as the donation was spent in Michigan.

What irritates me is not that they are examining tax code and looking at cutting back credits and deductions. That is necessary from time to time to keep government effective. Examination of the effectiveness of government programs is also called for from time to time.

What irritates me is that the targets appear to be political. They are not looking at all credits and programs. Only the ones that don’t match their political philosophy. When budgets are tight is a good time to review all income and expenditures.

My other irritation is “creating jobs”, the new smokescreen.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 18:40:10

As I see it, this is a credit that pushes decision making to the taxpayers. I would think you would favor that. Instead of the government deciding which programs to support, small contributors get to choose.

They’re choosing with other people’s money (in addition to their own). It’s really no different from the government taxing and then appropriating the funds based on popular referendum, except that those that are donating have a larger voice. I suppose that’s slightly better, but I still don’t agree with other taxpayers getting to appropriate my income for their causes.

Consider a simple $100 donation to the SPCA. You donate $100. You get to write that off of federal taxes, so the fedgov simply doesn’t take money from you they otherwise would have. Now the state gives you back $50. What has happened? The SPCA got $100, you only gave $50, so where did the other $50 come from? My pocket! In this scheme, the government could have to increase taxes simply to support the credits they’re giving!!!!

Examination of the effectiveness of government programs is also called for from time to time.

We’re in agreement here.

What irritates me is that the targets appear to be political.

Perhaps I’m missing something, but isn’t ALL government spending political, and based on the current representatives’ (the one doing the allocation) political philsophy?

Why do you expect budget cuts to work any differently from budget appropriations? Aren’t they exactly the same thing?

My other irritation is “creating jobs”, the new smokescreen.

We agree, but possibly for different reasons. It’s not the government’s job to “create jobs”.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 19:20:02

“Perhaps I’m missing something, but isn’t ALL government spending political, and based on the current representatives’ (the one doing the allocation) political philsophy?”

The difference for me is that it seems that a lot of the recent budget cutting and legislation is designed to consolidate political power and not to accomplish a policy goal. IOW, it is not about governance but about power.

I think this is why 2banana is so opposed to public employee unions. He sees it as a political power issue.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 21:15:16

“Now the state gives you back $50.”

This is $50 that comes out of the money you owe. So the state collects $50 less from you than it would have.

I don’t think credits will take you below zero. At least not at the federal level. I am not sure how Michigan handles it. If you have $40 withheld all year, you would only get $40 from the state.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 23:07:26

I don’t think credits will take you below zero. At least not at the federal level

I believe you’re wrong about that. It apparently depends on whether it’s a “refundable credit” or not. I’ve not looked up which credits are refundable versus not, but here’s a quote from TurboTax’s help pages:

In certain cases, though, you can get a child tax credit refund when the credit exceeds your tax liability. This means that you would get a check for the remaining child tax credit after your tax bill has been reduced to zero. This refundable child tax credit is called the Additional Child Tax Credit.

Ahh, with a bit more digging, from Yahoo Finance (avoiding links to save Ben work)

Nonrefundable credits include the child tax credit, dependent care credit, adoption credit, education credits, retirement savings credit, credit for the elderly and disabled, mortgage interest credit, and D.C. first-time homebuyer credit. Refundable credits include the additional child tax credit, the earned income credit, the health coverage credit, and the long-term unused minimum tax credit. If the credit exceeds your tax liability, you will receive a refund for the excess.

Of course that’s just at the federal level

 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 11:10:29

Yeah, private sector will provide those services — for a price, drumminj. Like multinationals buying wells and “providing” bottled water for quadruple the price and suing the people if they try to collect rainwater from their own roofs.

Do you truly believe that it is right to make a profit off of “needs?” And because it’s a need, there is no limit to what any company can charge, because people have to buy it.

How “relatively recent” did government develop social support systems? Ancient Rome? You could even argue that the skilled laborers on the Pyramids were government employees. (No insane pension though, sorry.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2011-06-07 11:16:12

bottled water for quadruple the price and suing the people if they try to collect rainwater from their own roofs.

I thought the government did that in the name of public safety. The whole public safety is nothing but a racket used to prop up the big businesses. Do you honestly believe that FDA, EPA, FCC, etc look out for the little guys?

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 11:55:37

Comment by oxide [this morning]
2011-06-07 06:09:45

I was in the middle of writing a longer post on another topic and gave up. It takes too long to explain and all I get is a non-specific talking point in return. Why bother.

 
Comment by polly
2011-06-07 12:23:27

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2011/06/13/110613ta_talk_surowiecki

About Elizabeth Warren and financial regulation, but ends with this:

While some bankers accept the need for consumer protection, they maintain that the C.F.P.B. will go too far and end up strangling financial innovation. But, over the past century or so, new regulatory initiatives have inevitably been greeted with predictions of doom from the very businesses they eventually helped. Meatpackers hated the Meat Inspection Act of 1906, but it rescued the industry from the aftereffects of the publication of “The Jungle.” Wall Street said that the creation of the S.E.C. would demolish stock trading, but the commission helped make the U.S. the world’s most liquid and trusted stock market. And bankers thought that the F.D.I.C. would sabotage their industry, but it transformed it by effectively ending bank runs. History suggests that business doesn’t always know what’s good for it. And, at a time when Americans profoundly distrust the financial industry, a Warren-led C.F.P.B. could turn out to be the friend that the banks never knew they needed. ♦

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:39:47

We NEED to strangle financial “innovation.”

It is a fact that without rules and regulations in commerce, people WILL and DO, lie, cheat and steal.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:42:01

You would be stupid to drink rainwater from your roof. It’s what is known as “grey water” and “non-potable.”

Water your yard with it? Wash your car? No problem.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:44:10

Do you honestly believe that FDA, EPA, FCC, etc look out for the little guys?

See my post above.

I trust them far, FAR more than I will EVER trust business. EVER.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 14:54:26

You would be stupid to drink rainwater from your roof. It’s what is known as “grey water” and “non-potable.”

Water your yard with it? Wash your car? No problem.

I water my yard with greywater from my kitchen sink. Every day, in fact. I don’t have the sink plumbed to the back yard. Too rich for my budget.

Instead, I use a quart-sized yogurt cup to scoop the dishwater into buckets. Then I carry the buckets out to the thirsty plants.

Which raises the question of what to wash the dishes with. The answer is water harvesting-friendly soaps like BioPac or Oasis. The Oasis soaps are specifically formulated to break down into nutrients for plants.

As for drinking roof-harvested rainwater, I have friends who do just that. They have a 10,000-gallon cistern, so they’re all set in the drinking water department. And, yes, they do have a water filtration system.

 
Comment by butters
2011-06-07 15:01:27

I am sure you can filter it. A friend lives in CA and I suggested he buy a Berkey water filter if he wanted to minimize the flouride intake. As it turns out, Berkey filters can’t be shipped to CA because of some obscure CA regulations. This is how government works. Your government is as good as people who run it. It’s not a talking point.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:04:30

Water filtration, no problem.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 13:48:45

You haven’t read much Dickens, have you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:37:17

Wasn’t he on Dancing with the Survivors Idol?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 15:49:08

“You haven’t read much Dickens, have you?”

I have found most libertarians to be woefully unlearned about the periods of history when their philosophy has already been tried- and found wanting.

Apparently it will be different this time.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:36:09

You’re well aware that the private sector can - and does - provide such services.

Name them. And the number of people covered.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 11:17:54

And if they can’t find a job, they should just start their own business. Ignore the fact that most new businesses fail in the first 5 years - many because they are undercapitalized.

Slim here. Gotta weigh in on this one.

I’ve had business ventures that succeeded. And ventures that failed.

What the failures had in common was plain old ignorance. As in, I didn’t know enough about business to make them successful. Or to decide that they were worth pursuing in the first place.

Now, to be fair, the above is almost guaranteed to happen to someone who spent a good bit of her employed life in non-profits and academia. Those aren’t exactly the right places to learn about business.

So, if I had the past to do over again, I would have gone into the for-profit sector a lot sooner than I did. I really needed the business experience — and the knowledge gained via experience — that badly.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 11:59:25

Inexperience in business is another major cause of failure. I would guess that most employees of for profit businesses are not experienced enough in business to succeed their first couple of times.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 12:17:42

Inexperience in business is another major cause of failure. I would guess that most employees of for profit businesses are not experienced enough in business to succeed their first couple of times.

The thing that really turned things around for me was having to take a Saturday job in a bike shop.

That job provided me with enough money to pay my grocery bill. And that was a big load off my shoulders. Despite the romanticism about starving artists, it’s tough to do anything when you’re hungry.

In addition to helping me meet a basic need, that job taught me how to sell. That was something that was missing from my business toolkit, and oh, did I need it.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:50:29

No matter what anyone says, just plain lack of customers is the number one reason for business failures.

I’ve seen many a business with their heads up their rear ends who only stayed in business because they had enough customers to cover their mistakes, even though it was obvious that it was only a matter of time before they went under from incompetence.

But until then, it was the volume of customers that forestalled that time.

I’ve seen other business that had all the right moves, but couldn’t find enough customers and shortly folded.

If this doesn’t make sense to you, let me tell you, it didn’t to me either, but that didn’t make it less true. I’ve seen it dozens of times.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:11:31

Agreed, eco.

It’s a demand-driven economy, contrary to what the “supply-siders” would like us to believe.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 05:59:07

Fed Exit Should Start ‘Long Before’ Jobs Recovery Is Assured, Plosser Says (Bloomberg)

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Charles Plosser said an exit from stimulus measures should start “long before” a recovery in the U.S. jobs market is assured.

“Somewhat tighter monetary policy is possible by the end of the year,” he said today at a press conference, after speaking at an event organized by the Bank of Finland in Helsinki. “We will have to begin exiting from our policies long before the unemployment rate is down to what people would like to have. That’s going to be a difficult decision.”

Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and the Federal Open Market Committee, which includes Plosser, are considering the tools they would use to pull back stimulus, according to the minutes of their April meeting. One possible sequence is to end the policy of reinvesting proceeds from maturing securities and later raise interest rates and sell assets, though such moves “would not necessarily begin soon,” according to the minutes.

“The challenge of when to begin to reverse course, the challenge to pick the timing and the pace of that correctly, is the challenge that we’re going to face,” Plosser said. “We will have to figure out a way to do it at the right time, because if we wait too late, we fall into traps.”

Plosser, 62, voted to complete the central bank’s $600 billion of bond purchases and backed its decision to keep interest rates “exceptionally low” for an “extended period.” In 2008, he dissented twice in favor of less monetary stimulus.

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-06-07 06:55:10

That can’t be good for the stock market or speculative bubbles in general. I am still not convinced thet the FED will stay out of the markets long term. Their balance sheet loaded with toxic waste, lender of last resort to the gubernmint. They might not be as vocal about it anymore but I would think they find ways extend QE.
Any idea what rising interest rates would do to housing, government debt, consumer credit, stock market, muni bonds, etc.
Either totally crash this wreck of an economy or keep on printing. No way out. I guess this would qualify as a conundrum.

Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 07:05:39

“They might not be as vocal about it anymore but I would think they find ways extend QE”.

Yep, count on it. No way the fed turns off the pumps at the end of the month.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:52:08

What jobs recovery?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 06:07:20

The Once and Future Dips of the US Economy
Bill Bonner Reckoning from Farmington, Pennsylvania…

Last week, it looked as though a tide might have turned. The Dow fell another 97 points on Friday. And the 10-year US Treasury note rose to yield less than 3%.

What will happen next? We don’t know. But it wouldn’t be a bad thing if investors took a beating. At least, the rest of the country would probably like to watch.

Yes, dear reader, pity the proletariat!

While investors have recovered most of their ‘08-’09 losses, the poor working stiff is still getting it in the chops. He doesn’t own stocks. He owns a house. And housing just keeps going down.

His earnings have been going down too.

He’d better get used to it. If we’re right, he won’t have to worry about just a ‘double-dip’ but about a triple-dip…a quadruple dip…and maybe even a quintuple-dip. Forget recovery. What we’re talking about is an on-again, off-again slump that will last for a decade or more. Heck, it’s already in its fifth year!

Why so?

Everything that has happened over the last 4 years confirms that our “Great Correction” hypothesis was right. This economy is going through major adaptations, adjustments and rehabilitation. And by the look of things, it’s going to be in an out of rehab for a long time.

The latest reports show:
1) No real growth
2) No real recovery
3) No end to the unemployment problem
4) No bottom in the real estate crisis
5) No benefit from QE2

The numbers that came out on Friday were just more bullets shot into a corpse. We knew the recovery was dead. But the non-farm payroll numbers killed it again anyway.

Comment by scdave
2011-06-07 06:57:19

#6….No government hiring…

Alabama County Faces Major Layoffs - NYTimes.com

Jul 31, 2009 … In every part of Jefferson County — Alabama’s most populous county … when two- thirds of county employees eligible for layoffs — up to 1400 …

Comment by GH
2011-06-07 07:20:58

I assume the 1/3 employees NOT eligible for layoffs are the Union Administrative levels where the real cost savings could happen at the least impact to services?

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 08:04:03

Is that the same county that spent 1 billion on a water treatment plant?

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 08:32:27

Yep. With the financing by Gollum Sucks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 14:53:22

That’s the one. But it’s the union’s fault they have to lay of those employees.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by polly
2011-06-07 08:17:42

That article is almost 2 years old. Not that the state finances have recovered or anything, but still, you couldn’t have looked for something more relevant?

Comment by scdave
2011-06-07 09:21:53

That article is almost 2 years old ??

but still, you couldn’t have looked for something more relevant ??

The original article “suggesting” future cuts maybe but the actual cuts have just started to occur…Try doing a little research before you get all condescending Miss Polly..

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama | Mon Jun 6, 2011 7:47pm EDT

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama (Reuters) - Alabama’s troubled Jefferson County says it may have to lay off up to 1,000 workers due to a $70 million shortfall in its operating revenue that is adding to its chronic debt problems.

The fiscal gap appeared in March when a state court ruled a tax for the county unconstitutional and officials says that as a result it will run out of operating funds in July.

It is also struggling to ward off what would be the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history over a $3.2 billion debt it owes on sewer bonds.

“There are close to 1,000 layoffs on the table. Even if the bill passes, the footprint of government in Jefferson County is still going to change drastically. We don’t have a choice,” county finance commissioner Jimmie Stephens told Reuters.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 09:38:24

$3.2 billion on a water treatment plant.

The Vampire Squid at work!

 
Comment by polly
2011-06-07 11:15:08

So why didn’t you just post the current one in the first place?

Seriously, I said that I was aware that state balance sheets had not improved, but a story from this month proves your point a heck of a lot better than one from 2 years ago.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 12:00:08

+1 Steve J.

Now I don’t know much about water treatment plant construction, but even the behomoth Texas Stadium cost only a bil. What the heck are they building down there in Birmingham? Pipes to Nowhere? Somebody must be luvvin’ them some kickbacks.

 
 
 
 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 07:19:43

There is NO possible way to repair this economy without inflating our way out, and that means wage increases and price increases. Wage increases and price increases mean protectionist policy, strong regulation of the finance sector and a willingness to allow home prices to settle to their natural level.

Something will have to be done to contain medical costs (hint not Obamacare) - I would be good for changing medical insurance to major disaster (hit by a bus rather than Joe has a sneeze) like car insurance and having folks pay for prescriptions and day to day care. The medical industry would have a fit with all their customers price shopping eh?

Several years ago while working big corporate on a software project I had vision coverage. The coverage did not work at Costco where I have been treated well in the past and the eye check was $45, but to save ME the $45 I went to a local optometrist who did take the insurance. Same tests, same result, but they billed insurance $450, but what did I care, I saved $45 right? This is repeated millions of times a day in America.

Comment by 2banana
2011-06-07 07:34:54

Amazing how costs come down when joe 6-pack (or geezers) have to actually pay for their medical services.

I find the cost DROPS of cosmetic surgery pretty amazing.

Competition does work.

Not covered by insurance - procedures in this field have come down dramatically. For example - the cost of laser eye surgery has come down by about 50% over the last 10 years.

Medical insurance (for decades) used to be you got reimbursed AFTER you had the medical procedure. So the cost was initially out of your pocket.

Did people shop around back then? Oh yeah. Even if they got back 100% of what they put out.

And medical costs increases were about the same rate as inflation.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 08:40:34

Good luck with that free market wet dream.

Ain’t gonna happen. The medico/narco/insurance cartel is too entrenched.

And if you haven’t been paying attention for the past 30 years, they’ve been transferring costs onto the back of Joe Q. as fast as they can……higher copays, higher premiums, “Billing in excess of plan” transfers, “procedure not covered” transfers, etc.

The whole system has been designed not to improve care, but to generate the maximum amount of revenue.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 08:52:46

Yup. I remember when we were told that copays were going to put a lid on cost increases as people would be more judicious on whether or not seek medical attention.

Now they’re saying the same about HD plans. The doctor’s office is a ghost town these days, but the price hasn’t come down there nor at the pharamacy.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:23:52

The whole system has been designed not to improve care, but to generate the maximum amount of revenue.

Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!

 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 10:51:03

“I find the cost DROPS of cosmetic surgery pretty amazing.

Did people shop around back then? Oh yeah. Even if they got back 100% of what they put out.”

Free market works fine for elective surgery. For infectious diseases and emergency care, not so much.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:19:35

Exactly.

What the libertarians don’t seem to understand is that the difference between “needs” and “wants” creates two different types of markets.

IMHO, all “wants” can be private; I couldn’t care less what they want to do. But the “needs” should be owned, controlled, or regulated by a transparent govt that is fully accountable to “We the People.”

 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 13:55:46

I concur, GH.

 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-06-07 11:25:40

What is a Recovery?

The definition seems to have mophed into a new meaning for the word.

Recovery appears to now mean effectiveness of stimulus propaganda.

A drug user in recovery will always be a drug user. Just pretending that they don’t need drugs. America will always be jonesing for bull$hit.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 06:10:33

USA Today:

Squeezed on both sides by stagnant wages and rising prices, consumers believe the chances of bringing home more money one year from now are at their lowest in 25 years, according to analysis of survey data by Goldman Sachs.

Goldman’s economist Jan Hatzius looked at the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters poll, which asks consumers whether they believe their family income will rise more than inflation in the next 12 months. Hatzius applied a six-month moving average to smooth out the data and found that wage pessimism is at its lowest in more than two decades.

“Households are already very pessimistic about future real income growth,” wrote Goldman’s economist to clients. “A slowdown in job growth would presumably translate into a further deterioration in (expected and actual) real income growth. This would heighten the downside risks to our current forecast that real consumer spending will grow 2.5 percent to 3 percent over the next year and might call for another downward revision to our forecast for US GDP growth in 2011 and 2012.”

Real hourly wages have dropped 2.1 percent on an annualized basis over the past six months, a rate of decline not seen in 20 years, according to Goldman. This analysis is backed up by the other most-watched consumer survey from the Conference Board, which indicated earlier this week that the proportion of consumers expecting their incomes to increase was below 15 percent in May.

“The crawl out of this economic ditch is going to be long and slow,” said Patty Edwards, chief investment officer at Trutina. “Even if they’re employed, many consumers aren’t earning what they were two years ago, either because they’re in lower-paying jobs or not getting as many hours.”

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-06-07 07:08:49

How’s that Hope and Change working out for you now, kidz?

*paid for by Palin/Santorum 2012 PAC

Comment by scdave
2011-06-07 07:56:55

*paid for by Palin/Santorum 2012 PAC ??

Didn’t we already try the “evangelical” route for eight long years ??

How did the Evangelical work out for you, Kidz ?

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 13:58:50

But where are prices rising? I don’t see that happening.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:07:51

You are very lucky. I saw +/-50% inflation in my region last year. It’s back below 10%, but last year hurt and hurt bad.

My income didn’t go up 50% and still hasn’t.

 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 15:09:54

At the grocery store.

Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 16:10:36

See, I can’t tell about the grocery store because I moved from the west to the east. Food out east is at least 30% higher than out west. When I was living in the west, the food prices were definitely not rising there. Maybe it has something to do with Mexican farms, I don’t know.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 16:29:54

Raw inputs are going up. Packaged foods and getting smaller unit volume/weight.

Eggs are up. Milk is up. Butter is up. Veggies are up. Meat is definitely up. Ice-cream/chips/etc get smaller and smaller portions per container while maintaining the same size.

Bonus : We’ll get thinner through being super poor!

 
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:24:07

Food, gas, utilities (SDG&E, phone company, cable, water, etc. — ALL have raised rates this past couple of years), medical insurance, rents, etc.

Inflation is everywhere, largely due to the actions of the Fed, IMHO.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:00:35

…as I’ve been saying. Only this has been going on for 30 years.

Good find wmbz

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:09:20

Pessimistic? Gee, I wonder why?

Republicans block ending offshore jobs tax breaks | Reuters

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68R40I20100928

 
 
Comment by tgun
2011-06-07 06:10:56

Hey gang! We have a winner here in Minneapolis-St. Paul. A columnist who writes for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune who actually “gets it” regarding the housing market. Here is his article which was published Sunday June 5th. Hope you enjoy it!

Housing rebound? Let’s find the bottom first
Article by: ERIC WIEFFERING , Star Tribune Updated: June 4, 2011 - 3:12 PM

As soon as home prices began tumbling five years ago, real estate agents, anxious homeowners, would-be buyers and panic-stricken lenders began looking for “The Bottom.”

While it’s so far proven to be as elusive as the Grail, unicorns and other totems of mythology, I’m confident that someday we will find the bottom in the housing market.

But let’s not confuse a bottom with a bounce back. They are not the same thing, and the first does not assure the second.

By now it’s obvious to all that housing, like tulips and dot-com stocks, was a classic speculative bubble. But the thing most people don’t appreciate about speculative manias is that it can be decades, if ever, before asset values or prices revisit the lofty levels seen during the peak of the mania.

For all the gold fever of late, prices when adjusted for inflation remain more than 40 percent below the all-time peak in 1980. Or, consider the tech stock-dominated Nasdaq index, which is 46 percent below its 2000 peak. Tulips, meanwhile, found a bottom 475 years ago.

Yet many homeowners and real estate boosters seem afflicted with the assumption that, once a bottom is reached, homes will begin to recover most, if not all, of the value lost during the past five years.

“There’s no reason to expect that,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. “It’d be like buying into Nasdaq and assuming it’s going to bounce back to 5,000.”

Baker was among the first to warn that the run-up in home prices was a speculative mania that would end badly. His 2002 paper was met with scorn far and wide. The Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University responded with its own study that declared there was little basis for concern about a housing bubble.

Few were as dismissive of Baker’s research as David Lereah, then the chief economist for the National Association of Realtors. Lereah’s 2006 book, “Why the Real Estate Boom Will Not Bust — And How You Can Profit From It,” occupies a special shelf in the business canon, alongside James Glassman’s late 1999 tome, “Dow 36,000.”

Baker worried in 2002 that housing prices nationally could fall as much as 22 percent, wiping out $2.6 trillion in household wealth. The plunge proved even deeper because the bubble kept inflating for four years longer. Nationally, average home prices are 34 percent below their 2006 peak, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index.

In Minnesota’s 13 most populous counties, the median price fell 26 percent between 2006 and 2010, according to sales data compiled by the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. Of the 103 sales markets tracked by the group, 101 have experienced a decline in median home prices since 2006. Meanwhile, the average price of homes sold in 2010 is roughly the same as it was in 2001.

Lost decade, anyone?

Just for fun, I tried to reach a few people who were brave enough to call a bottom in the housing market over the years. One who was sporting enough to take my call, Mary Bujold, is president of the Minneapolis-based real estate consulting firm Maxfield Research. I could almost hear her cringe when I reminded her of her March 2009 prediction, which she offered up to a Star Tribune reporter.

“Please, you don’t have to read it back to me,” Bujold said.

For Bujold, the biggest surprise was how deeply distorted the market turned out to be, and how much the entire economy had come to rely on consumer confidence tied so closely to a falsely inflated home value.

“When the whole tower started to tumble, I think there was a shock as to how far-reaching those effects were,” she said.

That’s the thing about bubbles: The bottom always seems to be six to nine months away, and it’s always a lot further down than anyone
ever led you to believe.
ericw@startribune.com • 612-673-1736

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-07 09:21:43

And there is the media doing it’s job.

The lies of NAR, Lereah, Yun and every realtor in the US need frequent exposure.

Well done Star-Tribune.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:00:18

I didn’t read the article, but I will applaud the author as a favor to tgun.

You go author. Go author, go!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:10:55

Exactly. It took 6 years to get to the bottom in the Savings & Loans disaster and this current catastrophe is far, FAR larger.

 
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:27:01

That was awesome, tgun! :)

 
 
Comment by dude
2011-06-07 06:24:24

Yesterday, with regard to QE3 Carl Morris wrote:

“I’m assuming that will happen. I wonder if they will find a way to do it under the table this time, though.”

My son-in-law who just finished his internship at the Treasury is firmly convinced that QE3 will be disguised and unannounced, it will simply consist of rolling all assets previously acquired by the Fed into T-bonds as they mature.

I see this as plausible but I don’t think the numbers add up unless QE3 will back off the level of pump underway with QE2.

FWIW.

Comment by butters
2011-06-07 07:22:32

Chirs Whalen said the same thing. There’s enough money coming in from QEI & QEII that no need to QE3 for some time……

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 08:19:12

The double-dip is here. There will be plenty of grandstanding over QEIII.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-06-07 13:49:28

As I said a while ago they will not announce it but when they continue to say they will keep interest rates low that is code speak for they will continue to print money to buy bonds. That is the only way they can keep interest rates down, the Chinese are selling not buying U.S. debt.

 
 
Comment by Jess from upstate SC
2011-06-07 06:27:14

Over a half million $$$$ per household . That is what the federal government’s obligations are at this time .. That will never be repaid . But the big question is , when will it all come down ???

Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 06:41:01

U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions ~ USA TODAY

The federal government’s financial condition deteriorated rapidly last year, far beyond the $1.5 trillion in new debt taken on to finance the budget deficit, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

The government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010, largely for retirement programs such as Medicare and Social Security. That brings to a record $61.6 trillion the total of financial promises not paid for.

This gap between spending commitments and revenue last year equals more than one-third of the nation’s gross domestic product.

Medicare alone took on $1.8 trillion in new liabilities, more than the record deficit prompting heated debate between Congress and the White House over lifting the debt ceiling.

Social Security added $1.4 trillion in obligations, partly reflecting longer life expectancies. Federal and military retirement programs added more to the financial hole, too.

Corporations would be required to count these new liabilities when they are taken on — and report a big loss to shareholders. Unlike businesses, however, Congress postpones recording spending commitments until it writes a check.

The $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations amounts to $534,000 per household. That’s more than five times what Americans have borrowed for everything else — mortgages, car loans and other debt. It reflects the challenge as the number of retirees soars over the next 20 years and seniors try to collect on those spending promises.

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-07 06:48:17

“The $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations amounts to $534,000 per household.”

So as to be in the running for the Nobel Prize in economics I am going to write and submit a paper demonstrating that this sum of money is somewhat unlikely to be paid.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 07:55:18

You may be correct Combo, but I take exception to the math, specifically to the lack of denominators. Let’s look at an individual’s “unfunded obligations”.

Say you’re 30 and earn $50K. You buy a nice little house for $200K, with a 30 year mortgage, in NY. You will need to pay back the $200K, and another $200K in interest. You’re also going to pay $300K in taxes and $100K in utilities. At 5% of the home price to maintain it and periodically upgrade the appliances and furniture, chalk up another $500K over your measly lifespan. Oh, utilities, throw in another $100K. So, you are going to be obliged to pay $1.4 million bucks, and you only make $50K!

HAHAHaHahaha!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by GH
2011-06-07 07:27:43

People do not get that Social Security is currently paying out a lot more than it took in, even if you allow for investment growth.

I hear the “I paid in all my life” garbage, but the problem starts when the calculations by which you originally paid did not include factors like medical costs increasing 20% a year for decades.

Every cent I pay into the system is paid out in benefits to someone who failed to pay in enough when they were working, and by every calculation possible when I retire in another few decades there will not be anything for me anyway, so really just a tax on the young to pay the elderly who vote in numbers.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 08:01:32

This is exactly how things looked 40 years ago. What I paid went to my grandmother and then to my mother. No way it would be solvent by the time I got old. I’m sure there will be adjustments in retirement age (there already are), tax rates and caps and the standard of living on the payouts, but “not a penny for you” is kind of extreme.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 08:42:46

“but “not a penny for you” is kind of extreme”

I agree. We wil most likely see a combination of an increased payroll tax and reduced SS benefits. SS COLAs (like private sector cost of living inreases) are a thing of the past anyway, so there’s your benefit cut.

 
Comment by Montana
2011-06-07 10:00:31

“I’m sure there will be adjustments in retirement age”

How can you be so sure? Any proposal like that is immediately shot down and demagogued. We can’t seem to get there from here.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-07 10:39:50

Maybe, but people born a decade after me need to wait an extra year for full benefits.

 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-06-07 12:19:10

That’s the problem w/inflation. Whenever unfunded Ponzi style entitlements are discussed you really can’t discuss simple math w/o including the influence / damage wrought by deflating the value/buying power of our currency. That turn of events was not brought on by the working class but by their central bank masters.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:31:15

Exactly what I was going to post, CarrieAnn!

Thank you.

**Inflation** is the cause of so many of our problems, IMHO.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:04:29

Social Security is predicated on the notion that people will always produce enough children to support us all in our old age.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 08:21:12

These obligations can be changed with the stroke of a pen. There is no legal basis preventing this from happening.

 
 
Comment by Steamed Bean
2011-06-07 08:21:24

And every year the number gets larger because the money is not set aside earning the required investment return embedded into the analysis. Assuming a 5% investment return adds another 3.1 trillion to the unfunded liabilty next year.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:02:03

I keep seing incarnations of what the we owe ourselves, and they keep getting bigger. It’s beginning to sound like a fish story to me.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:12:59

Study says most corporations pay no U.S. income taxes | Politics | Reuters

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1249465620080812

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 06:31:54

Roseland developer files for bankruptcy protection
TIMES-DISPATCH By Carol Hazard June 07, 2011

The developer of the huge Roseland residential and commercial project in northwestern Chesterfield County is fighting a second legal battle to get the development off the ground.

G.B.S. Holding Ltd, managing owner of about 900 acres in the 1,300-acre, mixed-used development, filed for Chapter 11 reorganization with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Richmond.

G.B.S. also guaranteed loans secured by Roseland Village, managing owner of a 342-acre high-density piece of the project, which filed for bankruptcy protection in late January to stop foreclosure proceedings.

“Those same banks [that went after Roseland Village] have turned on the grantor,” Bruce E. Arkema with DurretteCrump, the lawyer for G.B.S., said Monday.

With the first avenue blocked, the lenders went after G.B.S., forcing the bankruptcy filing on Friday of that entity, Arkema said.

Arkema said he plans to ask the bankruptcy judge to consolidate the two cases, so the borrower can more easily reorganize and proceed with the project.

“There are a lot of irons in the fire,” he said. “There are good prospects to get the development going.”

No homes have been built yet in Roseland, but a lot of pre-development activity is taking place, including road and master planning design. Houses have been built in the adjacent Hallsley subdivision.

George B. “Casey” Sowers III, manager of the family business developing Roseland and building houses in Hallsley, said the lending landscape hasn’t changed in the last couple of years, making financing difficult, but tools are available to get Roseland moving again.

“One is to pay off the loans, which we can’t right now,” Sowers said. “Or we can give the land back to the bank and allow for a fire sale. Or if you have enough equity, you can let the court protect it [the project] and let the development proceed.”

G.B.S. has bank loans of $23.3 million and assets of $57.9 million, so the hope is to proceed with the development and make the banks and everyone involved in the project whole again, Sowers said.

Essex Bank in Tappahannock, Central Virginia Bank in Powhatan County, Franklin Federal Savings Bank in Henrico County and Paragon Commercial Bank in Raleigh, N.C., are listed as creditors in court records.

Banks are under pressure from regulators to call or not renew development loans, even those made to developers with large equity positions such as G.B.S., Arkema said.

“Raw land loans are way out of favor,” he said. “Banks got their stimulus from the government through TARP [Troubled Asset Relief Program], but they won’t help out the poor developer.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:26:48

The bankruptcy hit parade just keeps on marching! Here’s the latest from Tucson:

3 Tucson hotels file for bankruptcy protection

Key point from the story:

“Hanson, who has filed for personal bankruptcy protection, has run into cash-flow problems because he acquired much of his real estate portfolio in 2007 when property values peaked, and he had to take on substantial debt to finance the purchases. During the recession, the hospitality industry has struggled as room rates plunged, many people cut back on leisure travel and convention business slowed.”

To which I say:

That “buy high, sell low” thing will get ya every time!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 06:35:22

Fewer jobs for unemployed workers
CNNMoney June 7, 2011

There are fewer jobs listed at one New Jersey career center. The unemployed feel the economic slowdown first-hand.

HACKENSACK, N.J. (CNNMoney) — No one has to tell the folks at the One-Stop Career Center in northern New Jersey that the economy is getting softer.

They feel it first-hand.

“The last month or two, it’s gotten very slow,” said Susan DeGroat, who lost her job as a billing manager two years ago. “I go online and the same jobs are still posted.”

DeGroat, who was using the computers to search for jobs at the One-Stop center in Hackensack, N.J., on Monday morning, has not been on an interview in more than a month. The 55-year-old applied for several positions lately, but has not heard back from the firms.

DeGroat is not imagining things. Fewer businesses are hiring these days and more people are coming in to discuss their unemployment insurance claims, said Salvatore Mastroeni, who directs the center.

The uptick in job openings he saw earlier in the year has waned amid concerns of regulatory uncertainty in Washington D.C. and fallout from the natural disasters hitting Japan and elsewhere in the U.S.

“Many of the employers that we talk with are hunkering down,” said Mastroeni, who first noticed the shift in April. “They are not willing, with the unknown before them, to expand and to rehire people at this particular point in time.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 06:37:46

Obama’s Commerce Nominee: Cap and Trade Good for ‘Hiding’ Carbon Taxes.

(CNSNews.com) – John Bryson, President Obama’s nominee to head the Commerce Department, told a University of California Berkeley audience in 2010 that a cap and trade system was a good way to hide a carbon tax from the public.

Bryson, formerly the CEO of Edison International, said that a carbon tax was the new “third rail” of politics because politicians wouldn’t want to tax energy directly.

“I think it’s still unlikely there’ll be a carbon tax bill because I think in the end a very high percentage of the members of Congress think it’s kind of the third rail to support a tax, even if it’s a carbon tax,” Bryson said.

“Greenhouse gas legislation, either with a tax or with cap and trade – which is a more complicated way of getting at it but it has the advantage of politically sort of hiding the fact that you have a tax – but that’s what you’re trying to do,” he added.

Bryson said that carbon taxes – whether open or hidden in a cap and trade regime – were still not the best way to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gasses. The best way, he said, was a robust system of regulations that penalized energy producers for producing more energy than the government deemed necessary.

“In the great debate between economists and others about whether we ought to be proceeding primarily with market signals or regulatory steps, I believe we ought to do both,” He said. “But the regulatory steps act right now [with] immediate requirements.”

Comment by 2banana
2011-06-07 07:14:06

Bryson said that carbon taxes – whether open or hidden in a cap and trade regime – were still not the best way to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gasses. The best way, he said, was a robust system of regulations that penalized energy producers for producing more energy than the government deemed necessary.

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

A very catchy phrase for the current administration…

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-06-07 13:58:16

It is happening all over the country with coal plants being forced to reduce their consumption of coal or being closed. Meanwhile, China is not burning almost 1/3 of all the coal produced in the world or three times the amount we burn.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 07:02:26

Mexican drug gangs building own tanks as war intensifies
http://www.mcclatchydc.com

MEXICO CITY — Mexico’s rival crime gangs are in an arms race, and the latest sign of that are the homemade “Mad Max” type heavily armored vehicles they deploy to withstand fierce clashes with each other.

The army found two more “narco tanks” over the weekend in Ciudad Camargo in Tamaulipas state along the border with Texas.

In earlier discoveries in April and May, armored vehicles found by authorities contained swiveling turrets, snipers’ peepholes and gadgets to dump oil and scatter tire-puncturing nails on roadways.

The latest discovery showed that the gangs are upping their game. The two armored vehicles were cloaked in inch-thick steel plating. Built on a three-axle truck bed with a heavily armored cabin, the latest “narco tanks” are far larger than previous versions.

“You can easily fit 20 armed people in here,” an unidentified army officer told El Porvenir TV as he showed the inside of one of the vehicles.

The officer said the vehicles could withstand fire from 50-caliber mounted weapons and grenade blasts, and contained a vicious pointed steel battering ram.

An army patrol found the tanks after soldiers spotted two armed men along a road on the highway from Nuevo Laredo to Reynosa, just outside Camargo, authorities said. The men ran into a warehouse. Inside, soldiers found the two armored trucks and a workshop to fabricate more. Two more trucks were in the process of being fitted with steel armor.

Each of the armored trucks had special synthetic insulation to deaden the sound of incoming rounds and air conditioning for the compartment.

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 08:25:01

A simple IED can take those “tanks” out as seen in Acapulco two weeks ago.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 07:11:53

East St. Louis, IL (KSDK) - East St. Louis no longer has a hospital - Kenneth Hall Regional Hospital closes its doors at 7 a.m. Tuesday.

The hospital has a history in East St. Louis that goes back more than 100 years but come Tuesday morning that history will come to a close and would be patients will have to find other options for emergency care.

Kenneth Hall is a nonprofit hospital run by the Southern Illinois Healthcare Foundation. The foundation says since 2000, the hospital host has lost $5 million a year, every year.

The hospital was already down to an emergency room and 39 mental health beds. Those services will now be moved to Touchette Regional Hospital in nearby Centreville, which is operated by the same organization. And while that’s not far it’s not good for East St Louis say city leaders - a sentiment shared by one of the last people to visit the hospital Monday night in need of a doctor.

“There’s going to be a lot of people getting hurt around here and Centerville is too far to be trying to rush somebody to the hospital if they get shot or killed or whatever,” said Farina Larkin. “I don’t think that’s a good idea for them to be closing down this hospital. And our police need it too in case one of them gets shot.”

Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 09:45:22

If somebody got killed, why would it matter which hospital they rushed him to?

[sorry couldn't resist]

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 10:27:02

Reminds me of the old “where would they bury the survivors” riddle.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:08:16

Her name is Farina.

 
 
Comment by mikeinbend
2011-06-07 07:21:45

Who was it again who broke the Weiner story? I heard from an unreputable source that since he was not resigning; that he was “pumped up” regarding his re-election bid and would be appreciative of continued constituent support.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 08:27:47

Who was it again who broke the Weiner story?

Oscar Meyer?

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 08:48:37

Johnsonville

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:27:52

Who was it again who broke the Weiner story?

Trojan?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 10:28:31

“Johnsonville”

That one probably went over the heads of most Californians. I don’t think I ever saw a bratwurst, not even once, when I lived there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jbunniii
2011-06-07 16:45:33

I assumed it was a play on words, “johnson” = “weiner” (cf. Big Lebowski).

 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 09:41:43

I thought he posted the pict on Twitter for all to see?

Comment by SaladSD
2011-06-07 10:19:59
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Montana
2011-06-07 10:02:06

I think it was Breitbart.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 07:39:19

GM chief pushing for higher gas taxes. ~ The Detroit News

Detroit — General Motors Co. CEO Dan Akerson wants the federal gas tax boosted as much as $1 a gallon to nudge consumers toward more fuel-efficient cars, and he’s confident the government will soon shed its remaining 26 percent stake in the once-bankrupt automaker.

“I actually think the government will be out this year — within the next 12 months, hopefully within the next six months,” Akerson said in a two-hour interview with The Detroit News last week.

He is grateful for the government’s rescue of GM — “I have nothing but good things to say about them” — but Akerson said the time for that relationship to end is coming because it’s wearing on GM.

“It’s kind of like your in-laws: It was a nice long weekend. We didn’t say a week,” Akerson said with a laugh.

And while he is eager to say goodbye to the government as a part owner of GM, Akerson would like to see it step up to the challenge of setting a higher gas tax, as part of a comprehensive energy policy.

A government-imposed tax hike, Akerson believes, will prompt more people to buy small cars and do more good for the environment than forcing automakers to comply with higher gas-mileage standards.

“There ought to be a discussion on the cost versus the benefits,” he said. “What we are going to do is tax production here, and that will cost us jobs.”

For the years 2017-25, federal officials are considering 3 percent to 6 percent annual fuel efficiency increases, or 47 mpg to 62 mpg. That could boost the cost of vehicles by up to $3,500.

“You know what I’d rather have them do — this will make my Republican friends puke — as gas is going to go down here now, we ought to just slap a 50-cent or a dollar tax on a gallon of gas,” Akerson said.

“People will start buying more Cruzes and they will start buying less Suburbans.”

With gas already over $4 a gallon in parts of the country, a higher gas tax is a hard sell.

Rebecca Lindland, an analyst with IHS Global Insight, said higher gas taxes in Europe did lead consumers to buy more fuel-efficient cars.

But she acknowledged that’s virtually impossible to see in the United States.

“It’s career suicide for a politician to call for raising gas taxes,” Lindland said.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 08:53:27

If the government is really interested in reducing fuel consumption, they will start raising fuel taxes.

The main reason why the Euros have fuel efficient cars, and high tech diesel engines, is because of their high fuel taxes.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-06-07 09:12:17

I hate bags of crap like this guy.

“A government-imposed tax hike, Akerson believes, will prompt more people to buy small cars and do more good for the environment than forcing automakers to comply with higher gas-mileage standards.
There ought to be a discussion on the cost versus the benefits,” he said. “What we are going to do is tax production here, and that will cost us jobs.”

Won’t selling fewer Suburbans also lead to job losses, especially since the Cruze is a very average/below average car in it’s category and the Suburban is above average for its category? Besides, if they can’t make the Suburban’s engine comply with federal fuel standards, then they should probably stop making it.

I’m ok with higher gas taxes too, as they would be directly borne by those driving the miles. But not at the expense of higher federal fuel standards, in addition to.

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 09:45:40

It takes more hours to build a small car than a pickup truck.

Comment by MrBubble
2011-06-07 10:59:46

“It takes more hours to build a small car than a pickup truck.”

Good. More jobs and better for the planet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-07 22:29:37

But we won’t look cool in our big-a$$ truck!

 
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 09:29:11

Here in Tucson, I’m well acquainted with more than a few people in the bicycle business. To a man and woman, they’re doing quite well these days. And they’re anticipating further business improvement.

Comment by rms
2011-06-07 21:05:58

Is that a bicycle store, or custom builder like Co-Motion of Oregon?

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:16:55

72 million people, half the US workforce, can’t buy new cars no matter how damn fuel efficient they are.

Marie Antoinette didn’t get it either.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-06-07 07:46:22

I would think that people who post on this blog would understand that the economic problems we have are longstanding, and will require years of painful restructuring to get past. They are not the result of the policies of the Obama Administration, which have mostly be palliatives.

The WSJ editorial page may not know what is going on, but someone there does.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304906004576369960155065484.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_markets

The worst that may be said of the Obama Administration is that THEY don’t fully understanding “that the economic problems we have are longstanding, and will require years of painful restructuring to get past” either. But “we’re screwed so let’s buckle down and tough it out together” doesn’t seem to win elections in the USA.

Obama said a few things along those lines early one. He should have stuck with it. This “we’re turning the corner” nonsense is just going to make a whole lot of Americans who are less worse than they were blame him.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-07 09:00:03

The top 10%ers have “turned the corner”. As Obama is a member of that class, he is is technically correct.

As for the rest of us? We are considered a “liability” for the most part.

Call it a back door genocide. Policies have been and continue to be implemented to increase attrition. Whack enough people, by accident or design, and in 5-10 years, your demographic problems are fixed.

Comment by 2banana
2011-06-07 09:47:18

Call it a back door genocide.

The “constitution right” front door works much better.

Like when blacks make up about 13% of the US population and they have 40% of all abortions. In some states, more blacks babies/”blobs-o-tissue” are aborted than born.

 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 08:12:49

Job Openings Fall First Time in Three Months
Bloomberg - Jun 7, 2011

Job openings in the U.S. decreased in April for the first time in three months, showing companies started to lose confidence in the expansion’s durability even before hiring slumped in May.

The number of positions waiting to be filled fell by 151,000 to 2.97 million, the fewest since January, the Labor Department said today in a statement posted on its website. The number of people hired and the number of workers fired also decreased.

The unemployment rate rose to 9.1 percent in May while employers added the fewest workers in eight months, Labor Department data showed last week. More job gains are needed to drive consumer spending after economic growth slowed in the beginning of the year.

“We’ve got a very weak, very mild recovery, which does not create enough demand for labor,” said Henry Mo, an economist at Credit Suisse in New York. “Even if all the open positions were filled overnight, we’d still have almost 11 million workers without jobs.”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 08:22:45

“Even if all the open positions were filled overnight, we’d still have almost 11 million workers without jobs.”

But I thought those 11 million were just lazy bums who want to spend the whole playing Xbox and eating pizza with their friends in their parents’ basement?

Comment by The_Overdog
2011-06-07 09:14:52

Well, that’s my cousin-in-law, who got fired from his job and quit school so he could wallow on unemployement. :)

But he’s probably a rare case, rather than the average.

 
 
Comment by michael
2011-06-07 08:23:51

“We’ve got a very weak, very mild recovery, which does not create enough demand for labor,”

add:

while having a zero interest rate policy…we are screewed blued and tatooed if we have another recession.

Comment by michael
2011-06-07 08:28:12

excuse me…when…we have another recession.

 
Comment by Steamed Bean
2011-06-07 08:41:03

Oddly enough, the fed set the stage for the next recession with QE2. Initial reaction to QE2 was the decline in the dollar and an increase in stock prices, but now the lagged affects of the lower dollar are starting to flow through. Higher gas and food prices that resulted from the lower dollar are now choking an economy that is 70% driven by consumer consumption. J6P can’t afford to buy anything else.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 11:16:41

I wonder how Americans would handle an austerity program like the ones Argentina and Mexico had to endure in the recent past?

Mexico had the benefit of an escape valve, as millions joined the Mexodus to the USA. Where would or could Americans run off to to escape the coming day of reckoning?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steamed Bean
2011-06-07 11:39:14

I don’t know. However, we are going to find out. Since the govt currently has $62 trillion in unfunded liabilities, and growing, alot of people expecting future benefits are going to be disapointed.

 
Comment by michael
2011-06-07 14:12:26

“Where would or could Americans run off to to escape the coming day of reckoning?”

to war.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:22:09

WW3 to be exact.

 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:11:44

“Congress has a law against hiring Americans.”

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:20:54

“We’ve got a very weak, very mild recovery, which does not create enough demand for labor,”

Just like the last 4 recession.

Thank god it’s not a trend or I would start to get suspicious.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 08:34:06

Half Moon Bay will cut staff in half under new budget
By Julia Scott julia.scott@bayareanewsgroup.com

HALF MOON BAY — And then there were 19. Or more accurately, 19.6.

That is the number of staff, or “full-time equivalent” employees, that will be left on the city payroll after the Half Moon Bay City Council votes Tuesday to outsource its police and recreation services. In so doing, it will lose more than half its employees — from 38 down to 19 and change.

The city has inked an agreement with the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office to take over the staffing, facilities and equipment of the Half Moon Bay police, a transition that will officially take effect at midnight Saturday. The move is expected to save the city $509,723 a year, though the savings won’t take effect until fiscal year 2012-2013.

Half Moon Bay already halved its staff in 2009, after the economy robbed the city of crucial tourist dollars and the city began paying off a costly legal settlement. Those cuts saved more than $500,000, but they weren’t enough.

“We had the hardship of the lawsuit, but we were able to recoup from that, do the budget and make our cuts,” said Mayor Naomi Patridge. “The thing that really hurt us besides that was the economy.”

The city of San Carlos will take over Half Moon Bay’s recreation department. Police and recreation will join a long list of other Half Moon Bay city services that have been outsourced in recent years, including the city attorney, public works and engineering, building inspection and code enforcement services.

Ironically, the $11.1 million budget the City Council adopted last week is slightly larger than last year’s budget — owing to some $500,000 in transition costs associated with switching over to a contract with the Sheriff’s Office and some street-improvement projects the city had been deferring until now. The council had to draw down its reserves to backfill a $1.1 million deficit, but officials say the savings will start to show next year.

For all its charm and natural beauty, Half Moon Bay has become a poster child for cities on the edge. National media outlets, including The Wall Street Journal and National Public Radio, have documented its fall from grace ever since the city lost a $36.8 million court judgment in 2007.

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 09:51:03

Why, yes a real estate deal was the cause if the law suit:

The dilemma arose from a long-running dispute over a 24-acre parcel just east of Highway 1 that is flanked by housing developments, spotted with trees and choked by 6-foot-tall weeds.
The property, known as Beachwood, is owned in trust by Palo Alto developer Charles “Chop” Keenan, whose trustee bought it in 1993 for $1 million in a foreclosure sale and planned to build an 83-unit residential subdivision.
The city had given tentative approval to a previous owner for the development but opposed the new plan, saying protected wetlands had appeared on the property. Keenan’s trustee sued.
Walker ruled that the city had created the wetlands - and damaged the property - by botching a storm drain project and by allowing dirt to be removed for a nearby housing development. Its wetlands status meant the plot could not be developed under state coastal regulations.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 16:13:17

So he should have been out 1 million plus some planning fees. 36 million is a ridiculous judgment.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:25:12

But, but, we all know it’s the overpaid union employees, and not bad deals and million dollar mistakes by the wise leaders, that are the cause of government employee layoffs!

Comment by Anon in DC
2011-06-07 19:49:20

The jobs are being outsourced. There still will be approx. the same number of employees but outsourcers don’t pay the lavish salaries and benefits that government employees get.

Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:54:19

They “outsourced” to other public employers. The employees are still government employees.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 09:10:37

The Markets News and Analysis June 7, 2011

Corporate insiders are selling

It may be only one straw in the wind, but it’s an ominous one: Corporate insiders last week accelerated the selling of their companies’ shares, even as the stock market was declining.

That at least according to this week’s issue of the Vickers Weekly Insider Report, published by Argus Research.

This represents an ominous shift in the insiders’ behavior.

Up until now during this bull market, the insiders have pulled back on their selling in the face of any market weakness — suggesting that they had confidence that the market would soon recover. Last week, in contrast, they apparently lost that confidence.

This doesn’t automatically doom the market, of course. And it’s always possible that the insiders will change their tune in coming weeks. But, for now, it can’t be a good sign that corporate insiders have been selling into the decline.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:28:58

And they aren’t in jail, why?!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 09:21:58

NL’s whale fountain shut off for sanitary reasons
By Kathleen Edgecomb : TheDay.com

New London — The city turned off the water at the new whale tail fountain over the weekend after someone reportedly defecated in the water.

“People are using the tail as a latrine,” Evelyn Louziotis said. “It’s an $11 million bathroom.”

“It’s sad,” City Councilor Michael Buscetto III said during Monday’s City Council meeting. “It’s two steps forward and three steps backward. There are people in the city who don’t care, and they need to be dealt with.”

Buscetto said since water started flowing in the whale fountain last month, police and fire officials have been called for people urinating, defecating and washing themselves off in the fountain water. He said some people who have cut themselves have also used the fountain to rinse off blood.

“I’m concerned with the sanitary aspect of the water,” Buscetto said, adding that there needs to be more supervision at the Parade. He said city officials know who is abusing the fountain and the Parade area.

“Let’s call them frequent flyers,” he said, referring to a group of people who routinely hang out on the benches on the Parade.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 11:20:21

Maybe they should install a port-a-potty nearby?

Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 12:07:47

That’s been tried in other places, with the end result that the porta-potties were quickly transformed into *ahem* houses of ill-repute.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:27:54

So because someone might be getting a BJ in a bathroom, they aren’t built and public health is ignored for the 98% of population who is doing nothing wrong?

Makes perfect sense to me. :roll:

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 09:28:32

ITEM: Dennis Kucinich Calls For Congress To Take Back The Power Of The Purse, Demands The Abolition Of The Federal Reserve: “The Founders Did Not Intend For America To Be Run By Big Banks And Wall Street”

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-07 09:32:18

Dam liberals and socialists. The Fed is our friend. We *need* the fed.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 09:44:58

gotta respect that man. He’s got his principles, and is true to them.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-06-07 10:22:57

As I’ve said:

Paul / Kucinich 2012

That combo makes no sense, and yet makes complete sense.

Comment by drumminj
2011-06-07 10:29:28

Paul / Kucinich 2012

Agreed. Having competing ideologies (but both with principles/integrity) in the executive would be great for this country.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:57:42

Yep.

I’d add Bernie Sanders and Ralph Nader to the list, as well.

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-07 11:29:47

Paul / Kucinich 2012

I would vote for them even if the D was at the top of the ticket. Despite things that I would disagree with both of them about, it would be real hope and change.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-06-07 16:05:18

+1.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 10:28:56

I agree 100% with Mr. Kucinch on this issue. He is correct in that “The Founders Did Not Intend For America To Be Run By Big Banks And Wall Street”

Congress has the power to do away with the federal reserve, however the vast majority will not go along with it. A damn shame!

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:30:23

It is in fact, the very reason for the American Revolution.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 09:31:34

Natural Gas Entering ‘Golden Age’
~ WSJ ~ Tuesday, June 7, 2011

The increasing abundance of cheap natural gas, coupled with rising demand for the fuel from China and the fall-out from the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, may have set the stage for a “golden age of gas,” the International Energy Agency said Monday.

Under a scenario set out by the IEA, global consumption of natural gas could rise by more than 50% over the next 25 years, with it accounting for more than a quarter of global energy demand by 2035, up from 21% now.

But while natural gas is more clean-burning than coal and oil, it is still a fossil fuel, and its increased use will lead to higher emissions of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, the IEA warned. More gas will also mean less take-up for low-carbon energy sources like renewables and nuclear power. “An expansion of gas use alone is no panacea for climate change,” said Nobuo Tanaka, the IEA’s executive director.

The global natural gas market is in the midst of a revolution that has huge implications for the future of energy. In the U.S., technological advances like hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,”—in which water laced with chemicals is injected into the ground to crack open dense, gas-bearing shale rock—have fueled a surge in production from vast new gas reserves stretching from Texas to Pennsylvania. Such techniques are now being applied in other countries with big shale-gas resources, such as China. The IEA says that over the next 25 years, 40% of the growth in total gas production will come from unconventional gas.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 11:21:57

Pick your poison, I guess.

Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-06-07 11:39:01

With fracking, you get poison, no picking.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-07 13:42:50

That’s what I meant, fracking poison or nuke poison.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-07 22:34:50

I had a golden age of gas yesterday. :)

Comment by CA renter
2011-06-08 05:59:09

:)

 
Comment by dude
2011-06-08 18:31:50

Nicely played.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 09:49:15

Price of average home has fallen £130 every week for the last year
By Becky Barrow, Business Correspondent

The average price of a home in Britain has plunged by nearly £130 every week for the last 12 months, an alarming report revealed today

Over the last year, house prices have dropped by a total of 4.2 per cent, the biggest annual fall since October 2009 during the depth of the recession.

The scale of the price plunge is massive, equal to the amount that a typical family spends on their weekly supermarket shop.

Tumbling: During May house prices fell at their fastest rate for 19 months

It is in sharp contrast to the boom years when people’s properties used to ‘earn’ more than they did every week.

But the figures, from the Halifax bank, show how thousands of people who recently bought a home have been left badly out of pocket.

In May last year, the average home cost £167,207. Today, the same property is worth £160,519, a drop of £6,688 or £128 every week.

This is likely to have tipped many people into negative equity, when the size of their mortgage is bigger than the value of their home.

On a more optimistic note, Martin Ellis, housing economist at the Halifax, said yesterday that house prices will stop falling later this year.

He expects prices will ‘stabilise’ during the second half of the year, although there may be a few more modest drops over the next few months.

Mr Ellis said: ‘We expect a moderate improvement in the economy during the remainder of 2011 which, combined with continuing low interest rates, is likely to support housing demand.

‘This should prevent a further marked fall in prices and help to stabilise property values later in the year.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Comment by Kim
2011-06-07 10:06:25

£130 = approx $213.71

Wow.

 
 
Comment by varelse
2011-06-07 10:08:14

Sarah Palin

Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 10:30:49

I’d get Palin out of my head, as should the media, she stands no chance of being nominated.

Comment by varelse
2011-06-07 11:49:02

Don’t want her nominated, but I do enjoy the frenzy she stirs up, among both those who love her and those who hate her.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:15:04

I refuse to validate that comment with a reply.

I mean, oops …

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 10:17:26

Talbots slumps after sales, outlook disappoint. June 7, 2011,

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Talbots Inc. TLB -39.14% shares slumped 31% in premarket trading on Tuesday after its fiscal first-quarter sales missed analysts’ estimates and the company pointed to a disappointing second-quarter outlook.

Second quarter-to-date sales and customer traffic continue to trend negative and the company expects second-quarter sales and gross margin will be “significantly below” last year, the women’s clothing retailer said.

“Our first quarter performance reflects an inconsistent customer response to our merchandise assortments, a challenging competitive environment and high levels of promotional activity,” said President and Chief Executive Trudy Sullivan.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 11:20:27

Second quarter-to-date sales and customer traffic continue to trend negative and the company expects second-quarter sales and gross margin will be “significantly below” last year, the women’s clothing retailer said.

When I was growing up, my mother got the Talbots catalog. I used to thumb through it.

Found the prices to be truly amazing. Not the sort of clothing I could afford. Yes, it was good stuff, but there was that matter of money…

Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 12:01:03

Looks like more folks are experiencing that “matter of money”

Women’s clothing store chain Talbots Inc. reported lower sales for its latest quarter, warned the decline would continue and increased the number of planned store closings nationwide to 110 locations.

| Washington Business Journal

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-07 12:13:55

It’s crappy stuff now. Talbots used to make very good, very classy clothing that well-to-do women could wear to work, including a very sharp pin-stripe pantsuit that I defended my thesis in. Then about 5 years ago, they changed so that they now sell yuppie faintly nautical casual clothes. Capri pants and cute sweaters, polo shirts, maybe a short twill skirt, with a few accesories. The quality is still very good and the prices are still high, but WHERE would I wear those outfits except a yacht party?

If I’m going to pay these prices for an outfit, it had better be appropriate for the office. For weekend wear, I can go to Wal-mart. I think millions of women had the same thought.

Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:16:28

Yeah, and they got into the weird habit of building Oompa-Loompa hips into all their skirts and slacks a while back.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Elanor
2011-06-07 14:19:22

Yep, that’s about when I stopped buying their stuff.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Elanor
2011-06-07 12:42:46

Talbots clothing lasts a long time if well cared for, and if you buy truly “classic” stuff, you can wear it for years and years…which I do. I maybe add a couple of new white shirts or a skirt per year, and that’s it. Multiply my shopping habits by a couple of million shoppers and you get declining revenues. Younger women don’t shop there and a lot of us older women are being more frugal these days. Sorry Talbots, when it’s time to watch the spending, you’re among the first things to forego.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 10:52:48

What, you guys haven’t read CNN yet today? It says homeowners are getting “ruthless” and walking away. lol.

-Home OWNERS

-Ruthless

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 11:24:36

Here’s the link. And, yes, the story quotes my favorite University of Arizona law professor, Brent White.

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-06-07 12:23:41

Giving a house back to the bank that they agreed to take in the event of a default is ruthless? Sounds like a simple execution of contract to me.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 13:55:20

And, if my real estate agent cousin’s experience is any guide, the bank may not want the house back.

My cousin’s investment property was in foreclosure. So, to the bank he said, “Take my house—please!”

Well, so much for the Henny Youngman act. The bank made my cousin an offer for a much-reduced mortgage. He accepted.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 11:38:13

The Next Financial Crisis Will Be Hellish And It’s On Its Way
Posted by Addison Wiggin

Bernanke and Volcker: Different men, vastly different monetary policies

“There is definitely going to be another financial crisis around the corner,” says hedge fund legend Mark Mobius, “because we haven’t solved any of the things that caused the previous crisis.”

We’re raising our alert status for the next financial crisis. We already raised it last week after spreads on U.S. credit default swaps started blowing out. We raised it again after seeing the remarks of Mr. Mobius, chief of the $50 billion emerging markets desk at Templeton Asset Management.

Speaking in Tokyo, he pointed to derivatives, the financial hairball of futures, options, and swaps in which nearly all the world’s major banks are tangled up.

Estimates on the amount of derivatives out there worldwide vary. An oft-heard estimate is $600 trillion. That squares with Mobius’ guess of 10 times the world’s annual GDP. “Are the derivatives regulated?” asks Mobius. “No. Are you still getting growth in derivatives? Yes.”

http://blogs.forbes.com/greatspeculations/2011/06/01/the-next-financial-crisis-will-be-hellish-and-its-on-its-way/

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:34:28

ELE

Extinction Level Event

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 12:09:52

Dude, and I ate a seafood queasadilla just the other day. Hope it was at least Atlantic:

http://epaper.ardemgaz.com/WebChannel/ShowStory.asp?Path=ArDemocrat/2011/04/14&ID=Ar06107

On April 1, Food Safety Net reported that the amount of radioactive iodine-131 isotopes in samples taken just off the coast of the Pacific Ocean had surged to 4,385 times above the regulatory limit …

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-06-07 12:51:04

“off the coast of the Pacific Ocean ”
Good thing that the Pacific Ocean only has one coast. That narrows it down.
Was it off Japan or California? The article is not very clear about it.

Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 14:18:39

Doesn’t matter. The same fish swim around both coasts. They’re annoying like that. Every time I see one, I’m like “stop swimming on different coasts, fish”, but it never stops. It always just turns around and starts swimming back to the other coast again.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-07 12:53:33

“4,385 times above the regulatory limit …”

Those are banker numbers right there…

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-07 13:07:33

Japan doubles estimate of radiation leak

BBC News - 2 hours ago

Japan’s official nuclear safety agency has more than doubled its estimate of how much radiation escaped from the Fukushima nuclear plant in the week after it was crippled by the earthquake and tsunami in March. More than 80000 local residents living …

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13689299

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-06-07 14:32:16

Yet organic food has beat the total people killed by the nuclear disaster by a factor of 10. May not ever no for sure the cause but all signs point to the organic farms:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-06-07/sprouts-can-t-be-excluded-as-e-coli-source-researchers-say.html

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-06-07 14:42:17

No =Know. Why a story from April. Nothing current on radiation levels?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 16:22:45

The FDA says they won’t test the fish for radiation. The reason given is that they don’t think there will be very much radiation in there. OK, so why not just test a few then? They are probably worried about fisheries going out of business. I guess that’s why we haven’t heard very much news. Perhaps some consumer organization will eventually test it for us. Personally, I don’t have a radiation-testing kit.

Radiation in medium to low levels does not kill you right away. You don’t find out until a bunch of people start getting abnormal cancers. And it can cause genetic mutations that are carried through your evolutionary line until it gets to the end.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 16:19:13

Organic food does not carry antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Maybe in Europe, I don’t know. In the US, you can’t call it organic unless it’s fertilized with droppings from organic depositors.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by albuquerquedan
2011-06-07 18:48:25

Organic food does not produce antibiotic resistent bacteria but apparently in Europe it has produced other outbreaks of e-coli:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/qatar-bans-imports-of-cucumber-tomato-lettuce-from-germany-and-spain-over-e-coli-outbreak/2011/06/05/AGXl0QJH_story.html?wprss=rss_world

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 12:35:40

“as a buffer against taxpayer-funded bailouts should the institutions fail”.

Fed eyes global bank surcharge: report June 7, 2011

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The Federal Reserve is backing a proposal at the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that would have the largest global systemically significant banks hold a capital surcharge of three percentage points. Bloomberg News, citing a person familiar with the discussions, said regulators meeting in Basel, Switzerland want to have more capital for the largest banks as a buffer against taxpayer-funded bailouts should the institutions fail.

Fed governor Daniel Tarullo said Friday that work among international regulators on a Basel committee charged with writing global rules for bank capital has sped up recently and that the Fed is coordinating its introduction of a U.S. proposal for a capital surcharge for big banks with a similar one under consideration by international regulators. The surcharge would be required by some big banks in addition to an already agreed-to requirement that global banks hold top-quality capital totaling 7% of their risk-bearing assets, according to the report.

 
Comment by Muggy
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 13:56:38

ISTR that poison sumac had much pointier leaves. But I could be wrong.

 
Comment by Neuromance
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-07 17:08:08

It’s a Brazilian Pepper tree, and I must destroy it.

Comment by Big V
2011-06-07 18:44:33

Yeah, pepper tree. They make great shade, and you can eat the pepper.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 12:58:15

~ Clipped from the 5 Min. Forecast

The chairs and nameplates are being lined up, the caviar is being prepped, the world’s finest hookers and blow are standing by. Tomorrow, OPEC gathers for one of their occasional price-fix… er, production quota meetings in Vienna, Austria. As always, the party will ensue.

But for a bunch of people who supposedly hold the world economy by the short and curlies… we can’t help but notice the ministers are looking decidedly feeble these days. As a consequence, the bickering — in Arabic, Farsi, Spanish, Portuguese and English — is liable to be more heated than usual this time around.

For starters, some of OPEC’s member nations are supporting a military campaign against another member nation. Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates back the rebels trying to dislodge Libya’s Col. Gaddafi from power.

True, OPEC has been through this before… with Saddam Hussein 20 years ago. But it’s a lot harder for 12 guys in a room to reach a decision when three of them have bosses who are scheming to overthrow or even kill the boss of another. Just sayin’…

OPEC’s two key movers, Saudi Arabia and Iran, are also bitter enemies. That said, they appear to be in agreement this time on one essential issue: They think it’s time to bring more oil onto the market by boosting OPEC’s production quotas.

They’ve sat unchanged since they were lowered in December 2008 — when oil prices had crashed to $32 a barrel and it looked as if nuclear winter was descending over the world economy.

“OPEC is trying to compensate part of the shortage of supply of crude and create a balance in the market,” Iran’s OPEC governor Mohammad Ali Khatibi said recently. Usually, the Iranians are in the lead pushing for higher prices.

It’s one thing for OPEC ministers to say they want to boost production. It’s another to actually pull it off. This brings us back to an issue we’ve examined before — “spare capacity.”

Spare capacity is the ability of oil producers to jump-start new production within one month and keep it going for three months. Right now, there’s not much of it…

Libya’s 1.3 million barrels a day of production are out of the picture for the duration of the war there
Production in Venezuela, under the stunning mismanagement of our favorite caudillo Hugo Chavez, has been falling for years
Oil installations in Iraq have come under attack in recent months
Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates are already pumping full-tilt.
That puts the spare capacity burden, as usual, on Saudi Arabia.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-06-07 16:53:24

I thought the Muslim members of OPEC only get hookers in heaven.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 13:02:26

In the meantime, let’s add this next item to our “man-versus-bureaucracy” file — proof that when it comes to busybodies, no good deed goes unpunished.

The good deed in this case is Mike Haege helping folks in Minneapolis whose trees had been knocked down by a tornado May 22.

As the owner of a tree-trimming business in a town about 40 miles away, Haege figured he could help. The morning after the tornado, he drove to Minneapolis to volunteer with the Urban League. He signed a waiver and headed out with his bucket truck and a wood chipper to get started.

Then a city inspector showed up.

You know where this is going. Haege doesn’t have a license to trim trees in Minneapolis. Never mind that he was volunteering his services.

Neighbors came out to tell the inspector he, indeed, was working for free. Haege showed the waiver he signed.

Nothing doing. He had to go. So he packed up. Passersby who saw his bucket truck begged him to stop and help. He did stop once — to move a tree, an act that, presumably, does not require a permit.

At that point, plainclothes cops who had nothing better to do pulled him over.

Unbeknownst to him, they’d been following him to make sure he left town. And they called in a bunch of uniforms for backup… just to make sure this obvious menace to the community didn’t pose a threat to the officers’ safety.

Haege hit “record” on his cell phone video camera as he was detained for the next two hours…

Finally, he was let go. In his mailbox a couple of days later was a citation from the City of Minneapolis for trimming trees without a license — a $275 offense.

~ The 5Min. Forecast

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 14:00:53

Oh, for pete’s sake!

Back when I was doing post-Katrina reconstruction in MS, one of my fellow volunteers was a union plumber from Georgia.

Since he was doing a job in Moss Point, MS, he stopped in at the city hall to see what kind of licensing he needed. He had all the necessary paperwork — Georgia contractor’s license, union card, business license from his hometown, etc.

He had no problem getting the proper certification to work in Moss Point. And the city hall people were amazed that he was coming to their town to work for free.

Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 15:55:17

Well after Hugo plenty of folks came in to help us out, long before FEMA ever showed up with their BS. We did just fine on our own no need to get permission from gubmint to work and clean up! Funny how that works out.

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-07 14:46:41

I wonder who had a brother-in-law with a tree business?

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 16:35:34

You know it.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-07 15:37:20

As I’ve said, it your LOCAL government hat is the most intrusive and oppressive.

LOCAL.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 13:09:53

NJ plant closing, laying off 146 workers

PENNSAUKEN, N.J. — LiDestri Foods, Inc. is closing its 230,000-square-foot plant and laying off 146 workers.

The maker of Francesco Rinaldi spaghetti sauce, private-label sauces and other foods is consolidating operations at its base near Rochester, N.Y.

LiDestri will close July 22, Terry Carr, Pennsauken’s associate director of economic development, said this morning. The company will work with the state labor department’s business closing response team to help find new jobs and training opportunities for the people who will lose their jobs.

“This is a very sad day,” he said. “It is always hard when people are out of work.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 13:37:51

Sounds like B.B. is sniffing crack again, green crack that is…

Bernanke Sees Stronger Growth in 2nd Half of Year- AP

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says temporary factors, such as higher gas prices and the crisis in Japan, are the main causes of a softening economy. But he predicts growth will pick up in the second half of the year

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 13:43:05

“which ended in June 2009″ LOL! Yea riiight!

Consumers borrowed more for 7th straight month

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans borrowed more money in April for the seventh straight month, but they cut back on using their credit cards.

Consumer borrowing rose by nearly $7.2 billion, fueled by greater demand for school and auto loans, the Federal Reserve said Tuesday. A category that measures credit card use fell for the second time in three months. It has risen only twice since August 2008, the height of the financial crisis.

The 3.1 percent overall increase pushed consumer borrowing to a seasonally adjusted annual level of $2.43 trillion, just above the nearly four-year low of $2.39 trillion hit in September.

The report includes auto loans, student loans and credit cards, but excludes mortgages and loans tied to real estate. The Fed will give a more complete picture of Americans’ debt on Thursday when it issues its quarterly report on household net worth.

Households began borrowing less and saving more to cope with the recession, which ended in June 2009. Credit card use has plummeted nearly 19 percent over the past 20 months and it has dropped 5 percent over the past year.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 14:21:10

WSJ confirms what we’ve long suspected about HELOCs. Story:

More Homeowners With Second Mortgages Are Underwater

The lede:

“Almost 40% of homeowners who took out second mortgages—extracting cash from their residences to cover everything from vacations to medical bills—are underwater on their loans, more than twice the rate of owners who didn’t take out such loans. “

Comment by Neuromance
2011-06-07 15:53:07

There are those to whom the concept of saving money, amassing any kind of cash, is an utterly alien concept.

I’m not saying that pejoratively, or in any kind of negative way. Merely as a statement of fact. And it applies for these people regardless of cash flow. I knew an Ivy League engineer who lived like this.

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-06-07 15:47:50

High comedy - Jamie Dimon allegedly griping to Bernanke about new too-harsh regulation. Pure political theater. If this guy can get an audience with Bernanke in public, do you think they’ve not previously spoken in private? The Jamie and Bernie Show. High comedy.

Jamie Dimon gripes to Bernanke
By Annalyn Censky
CNNMoney June 7, 2011: 6:34 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is still griping about financial reform, and this time, he took his complaints straight to the top official at the Federal Reserve.

[...]

Dimon blames financial reform for stifling growth. He gave the Fed Chairman a laundry list of ways regulators have already cracked down on the banking system, after the Dodd-Frank financial reforms were passed last year.

[...]

http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/07/news/economy/jamie_dimon_bernanke_dodd_frank/?section=money_latest

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-07 16:32:50

If I were Bernanke, I’d tell Jamie to drop and give me 20. Pushups, that is.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-07 15:52:06

Our local TV channel runs commercials constantly with Henry “the fonz” Winkler pimping reverse mortgagees from quicken loans. To listen to these folks “testimony” it’s apparent the plan all along was to live off their home once they retired. Now they can live the life they deserve!

Comment by jbunniii
2011-06-07 17:16:22

Nothing wrong with that IMO. You can’t take it with you.

 
 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2011-06-07 17:01:35

The police officer was injured when he tried to keep a party reveler from breaking off the Mercedes-Benz logo of his patrol car.

Hamburg police have a WAAAAY better union that any in the U.S. It’s on Huffpost about the German girl who accidentally invited all of facebook to her birthday party (including her home address).

Facebook Party Gets Out Of Control After German Girl Forgets Privacy Setting - Huffington Post

 
Comment by rms
2011-06-07 17:45:34

Comment by GH
2011-06-07 07:01:22

“Not a popular belief, but our current economic problems are indeed the end result 25 years later of Regan policies, specifically his desire to deregulate big business.”

I was all but wiped-out as a high rise building contractor when Reagan let the trail lawyers have their “deep pockets” joint and several liability act. My insurance premiums were jacked-up so high that my clients decided to cut back my services by half; it didn’t take long before the trophy girlfriend was gone among other things. On the bright side, the event forced me to return to college for an engineering degree. I’m still bitter looking back though. The seventies and eighties were tough years.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-06-08 00:41:08

Baby bulls are throwing a tantrum: “Where’s my next bailout?!”

The Financial Times
Markets sulk after Bernanke calls halt to QE
By Jamie Chisholm in London and Song Jung-a in Seoul
Published: June 6 2011 07:48 | Last updated: June 8 2011 08:02

Wednesday 08.00 BST. Markets are sulking after Ben Bernanke late on Tuesday appeared to signal the end of quantitative easing.

The chairman of the Federal Reserve acknowledged that “accommodative monetary policies are still needed” as the US economy struggles for traction. But he stopped short of suggesting any further quantitative easing, as some had hoped.

Wall Street promptly threw a strop, swiftly giving up gains to finish at a fresh 11-week low, and that has carried through into Wednesday’s action.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post