June 27, 2011

Bits Bucket for June 27, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

381 Comments »

Comment by Hard Rain
2011-06-27 03:35:34

Woo hoo I’m rich!!!

Drop in gas prices a boon to consumers

As the summer driving season revs up, Boston gas prices have fallen 19 cents from a month ago, and analysts are predicting more relief is on the way.

The average price of a gallon of self-serve regular dropped to $3.68 yesterday, down from $3.74 a week ago and $3.87 one month ago, according to GasBuddy.com.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0627oh_what_a_relief_it_is_drop_in_gas_prices_a_boon_to_consumers/srvc=home&position=4

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 04:22:36

Not possible, not in this hyperinflationary environment.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 05:57:55

They’re still pretty damn high. Out here they haven’t even dropped 10 cents from the year’s high. I seriously doubt that prices will dip below 3 before they start climbing again, especially after QE3 rears its ugly head.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-27 09:51:58

My fill-ups have dropped from $60 or a little more, to about 55 bucks.

Yeah, I’ll be able to put a kid thru college on that $5-10 a week I’m saving.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-06-27 10:57:19

The news this morning was extolling the potential coming drop of 10 cents per gallon in gas prices.

Nevermind the 90 cent increase over the past year, let alone the longer term trendline…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 12:39:19

Also, ever notice that when prices rise they do so rapidly, but when they fall its as slow as molasses on a cold day?

 
 
 
 
Comment by hobo in mass
2011-06-27 04:49:09

So lets see….on a busy week if I go to the Cape for the weekend, I drive about 180 miles. My little Civic gets about 35mpg’s in the summer. 180/35=~5 gallons….I got an extra buck.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 05:13:38

Gas prices meaningless to me. Say you drive a reasonable 25 mpg car like mine. Even if you live 20 miles from work, every 50 cent gas rise is $300 a year. It sounds like a lot, but that $300 also buys one latte — or woman’s magazine — a week. It buys $25 in utility bills per month, or a $25 month increase in HOA fee or rent, or a couple bottle of allergy pills. And those are SMALL expenses.

Government would be well-served to pass laws which work on the BIG expenses: housing, health care, college, and *sigh* taxes.

(by the way, Dems tried to cut taxes on the under-$250K crowd, and were blocked by R’s.)

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 05:51:28

“Dems tried to cut taxes on the under-$250K crowd, and were blocked by R’s”

Somehow, I suspect that this is not a simple truth.

Wake us up when Ds &/or Rs actually do something to significantly cut the size of the FedGov. Ring the church bell when one of them says no to Wall Street influence money.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:02:59

Oxide likes to regurgitate DNC talking points. Ignoring the DNC’s own role in our sad socioeconomic decline. Baaaaaaa! Baaaaaaaa!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 07:07:08

What would the libertarians have done differently? Imposed tariffs or quotas on imports? Forbidden offshoring? Why, no. They oppose all those things.

So what would be different?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-06-27 07:51:09

‘They oppose all those things’

If you’re going to “tell” us what libertarians think, at least try to get it right.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 08:23:25

Help me out, Ben. All I can see is that the libertarian party wants to blast us back to the 1700’s in the name of “freedom.”
I don’t like government housing intervention, but I like sewers. Can you see the line I am drawing here?

If my question seems inflammatory, I apologize (it’s not meant to be), but I would really like to know what the true essence of a libertarian is, even if it’s just a little “l.”

I’m asking because for a while I thought I was one…

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:49:39

Mind if I cut in? Wanting more “liberty” does not mean wanting anarchy. Defensive party hacks might paint it with the crazy brush, but that does not make it so.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 09:00:02

I’m reading up on all of this now:

http://www.lp.org/platform

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 09:13:37

I have the same dilemma…I agree with the Ls on a lot of things, but I also believe that certain things make more sense as regulated public utilities even if the Constitution didn’t originally provide for that. Tragedy Of The Commons and all that…

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:16:31

Where would we be if we didn’t have Goldman Sachs to sell us credit swaps on sewer projects??

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 09:24:46

My understanding is that most libertarians oppose any government regulation of who businesses hire, or where they hire and employ them. The free market, and all that.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 09:51:01

“My understanding is that most libertarians oppose any government regulation of who businesses hire”

In other words, they support open borders.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 10:02:59

“In other words, they support open borders.”

See, that’s what’s so weird about all of this. There are many contradictions in there; and right on the site it says they don’t believe the government should be involved with who loves who, which I interpret as gay friendly, but then the TEA party hijacks that in a religious way saying marriage is not for gays.

I don’t get it. I like a lot of the libertarian stuff, but then I get confused with the TEA party nonsense, which to me, just seems like a bunch of misinformed, old, racist, white people.

I’ve been clear about my education stance, but I also think some of the libertarian views on military are a little naive. I am against all of our current wars, but do I think we should have spooks in every corner of the planet? Yes.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 10:28:52

In other words, they support open borders.

Which is another Tragedy Of The Commons issue, IMO.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 11:11:23

I just don’t want to hear any Libertarians complain that their teens can’t find a summer job.

 
Comment by Pete
2011-06-27 19:18:08

“My understanding is that most libertarians oppose any government regulation of who businesses hire, or where they hire and employ them. The free market, and all that.”

My understanding has always been that they oppose govt. regulation only within the framework of the USA. Maybe I haven’t been keeping up, but I always saw them as fiercely protectionist, which on the surface seems contrary to their free market preachings. Feel free to set me straight. I’m not talking about the Tea Party folks, but the card-carrying members of the Lib party over the past few decades.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-28 04:43:45

“but I always saw them as fiercely protectionist, which on the surface seems contrary to their free market preachings. ”

You are correctly pointing out a contradiction in their current philosophy. Traditionally, libertarians have favored open borders- no borders, even- which, as you point out, fits in perfectly with their free market preachings.

The latest incarnation of some as protectionists is indicative of a hypocrisy that of course they are blind to. Suddenly, we need the protection of Big Government- but only in restricting the free movement of goods and people between markets.

Bend your philosophy to suit the times, just like a republicrat…

 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 06:55:30

============

December 2, 2010:

House Democrats on Thursday passed a bill making middle-class tax cuts permanent as Republicans accused them of playing political games at a sensitive time.

The bill passed 234-188 but stands no chance in the Senate. But House Democrats, who want to let the cuts expire for the wealthy, wanted to publicly stake out their position before compromising on extending the tax cuts for everyone. ..

Forty-two Senate Republicans signed a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., saying they intend to block action on all Democratic-backed legislation until the Senate votes on extending the Bush tax cuts, as well as a budget bill needed to keep funding the government into next year.

==========

And from where did I regurgitate this DNC talking point?

FOX NEWS:

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/02/lawmakers-negotiate-tax-cuts-house-plans-vote/#ixzz1QU688YHE

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 07:50:44

*crickets*

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:50:54

*frogs*

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-06-27 08:57:12

“But House Democrats, who want to let the cuts expire for the wealthy”

D’s wanted to extend tax cuts only for those under $250k.
R’s wanted to extend tax cuts for everybody.

You make it sound like R’s wanted to raise taxes on those under $250k.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 09:08:59

Isn’t it curious that this $250K is well above the salary of a congressman?

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:17:43

Congressmen are all millionaires, they must make a lot more than $250k/year.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:02:07

Gas prices meaningless to me. Say you drive a reasonable 25 mpg car like mine.

But that unfortunately is not the norm. Too many J6P’s have long commutes and drive trukz or SUVs that get around 15 mpg in real world driving conditions. I see them grimace at the gas station where they spend $100 to fill up the tank.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:06:02

How many J6Ps need to drive a monster dualie pickup to their job in a cubicle farm? Let them grimace when they fill up the tank. I’ve done plenty of grimacing in my small car when these jokers whose driving abilities are inversely proportionate to the size of their trucks have narrowly missed running into me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-27 06:34:57

Sam…. sometimes you take the words right out of my mouth.

I recall back in 2002 when it seems a switch was flipped and McMansions we’re the standard and limp wristed tie wearing office boys(who produce nothing) began driving to work in F350’s and other heavy framed haulers. I never saw them haul a single thing. I knew we were doomed back then.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 09:11:29

How many J6Ps need to drive a monster dualie pickup to their job in a cubicle farm?

None. It could even be argued that tradesmen don’t need big pickups. Tradesmen in Europe seem to get along fine with diesel powered, 4 cylinder minivans.

But these behmoths are burned into our national psyche. High enough gas prices will help us break the habit, but for now those trukz aren’t going away. J6P will drive his manhood extender into the ground and maybe then buy something that’s more fuel efficient.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 10:08:21

You could put a bed in the back of a station wagon and head out to the secluded lake with a outdoorsie type of girlie and skinnie dipp……oh wait i did that when i was 19

————-
How many J6Ps need to drive a monster dualie pickup to their job in a cubicle farm?

 
 
Comment by whyoung
2011-06-27 06:28:16

“Gas prices meaningless to me”

Perhaps, but for the average person I think they are important because it is an item they purchase regularly and use as a mental reference point regarding general pricing and when they get to the “grimace” point it (rightfully) scares them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 06:57:12

It would be nice to see a headline article discussing the impact on food and fuel prices of turning food into fuel. That would get a grimace or two.

Stop the Corn!

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 07:26:27

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2011/06/five-ethanol-myths-busted-2/

Five Ethanol myths, Busted

1. Myth No. 1: Ethanol requires more energy to make than it yields. False. Argonne National Laboratory research has shown that corn ethanol delivers a positive energy balance of 8.8 megajoules per liter.

2. Myth No. 2: Ethanol production reduces our food supply. False. Only 1 percent of all corn grown in this country is eaten by humans. The rest is No. 2 yellow field corn, which is indigestible to humans and used in animal feed, food supplements and ethanol.

3. Myth No. 3: Ethanol crops and production emit more greenhouse gases than gasoline. False. A 1996 EPA study analyzing sources of air pollution confirmed that gasoline vehicles and non-road equipment are the largest contributors to vehicular gaseous hazardous air pollutants. However, another study showed ethanol reduces tailpipe carbon monoxide as much as 30 percent and tailpipe particulate matter emissions by 50 percent (.pdf).

[Are pollutants and CO greenhouse gases?]

4: Ethanol requires too much water to produce.
False. The amount of water used to make ethanol has declined dramatically. Today, producing one gallon of ethanol requires about 3.5 gallons of water. That’s a little more than it takes to process a gallon of gasoline.

5. Cars get lower gas mileage with ethanol: OK, this one’s true.

========

I don’t quite believe the happy talk presented in the article. But even if all of this were true and ethanol was so wonderful, then I guess they can get along just fine without subsidies, right?

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 08:06:07

2. that’s an irrelevent response. Animal feed, food supplements are still part of the food supply. And of course if there wasn’t a market inflated by ethanol fuel subsidies, those fields might be planted in something different.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:08:24

I am sorry to disagree, but it does indeed take more energy to produce ethanol than you get back. Field corn is food. Geeeez. Tortillas, ya think they are made from sweet corn? Corn syrup in that Pepsi? Beef, it’s what’s for dinner? Was field corn invented just to drive our cars? What did Huck Finn steal from the farm field? They don’t sell sweet corn in farm stands in Louisianna, only Field Corn.

Apparently, the FedGov can hire any conclusion from think tanks that suits the agenda.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 08:28:49

I agree, you guys.

This article is clearly slanted and juiced in favor of ConAgra and ADM. If nothing else, ethanol takes up arable land that could be used to raise broccoli, or apples, or wheat, or chickens, or just plain prairie grasses to keep the soil from blowing away.

Blue Skye, I’m not sure it’s FedGov who “hired” this conslusion.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:45:16

You are probably right.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-06-27 08:59:11

Oxide, +1 for “I guess they can get along just fine without subsidies, right?”

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:19:55

I don’t know any farmers that produce thier own ethanol for use in farm vehicles.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-06-27 09:24:09

“I guess they can get along just fine without subsidies, right?”

Without subsidies and tariffs, we would be getting almost all of our ethanol from Brazil, where it is incredibly-cheap to make from sugar cane.

And that would be way more efficient.

 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 09:32:44

I’ve heard the return on energy investment for ethanol is like 1.1 for corn vs 6-8x for sugar cain. This is about what wikipedia says.

Seems to me we should be growing more sugar cain. I suspect that with corn positive or negative energy yield depends on a lot of assumptions about farming technique, but with sugar cain there is definitely a net positive.

I still believe we use ethanol more to drive up corn prices the way OPEC drives up oil prices.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-27 09:57:06

What’s really fun around here is watching the city slickers go out in the country and steal a few ears of field corn, then bitch about how tough it is when they try to make corn-on- the-cob for dinner.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 10:32:22

I’m a little wary about getting ethanol from Brazil. Then we’d just be beholden to the Brazilians instead of the Saudi’s. Not to mention how much Amazon forest would be cut down to raise sugar cane. That’s part of why there were those subsidies to begin with. To “protect American jobs.”

But growing corn and making ethanol is so automated now that you won’t lose THAT many ag jobs if the business went to Brazil. I’m not sure how to solve it.

 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 11:32:06

We could grow sugar cane and other crops better suited for ethanol.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 12:42:53

Oxide hits the nail on the head about the subsidies. If it took less energy to produce ethanol than gasoline, btu/btu, it wouldn’t be more expensive. Farmers would grow their own. What farmers do trumps any ivory tower study.

 
 
 
Comment by jc
2011-06-27 07:51:53

It’s not a lot for you, but it’s a big expense for truck drivers, delivery trucks, the guy who mows your lawn, etc etc. They will pass those costs onto you in some way or another.

Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 08:01:16

You’re right, jc, it is a big cost for those whose jobs are depend on vehicles.

But wait, if they are able to pass the cost off onto the consumer, then why are they complaining? It shouldn’t affect them at all.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:57:06

The difficulty comes when the “consumer” looks to pass it off. Since that isn’t going to happen (unless they work for the government) the consumer will only pay you so much. If your fuel costs go up, your earnings go down. It’s long division.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-06-27 09:12:51

There is an interesting change happening for delivery trucks. There are some companies (Frito Lay I heard was one) is electrifying some vehicles. Apparently the marginal cost is made up quickly based on difference between the cost of electricity vs. diesel/gasoline.

The need for “long haul” capabilities in delivery trucks is not a concern, as the delivery trucks have defined and predictable routes every day, so they can easily determine which routes are useful for electrification. Apparently one of the biggest issues with them are that they are too quiet…they sneak up on bikers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 09:28:51

Apparently one of the biggest issues with them are that they are too quiet…they sneak up on bikers.

That could be a problem for hard-of-hearing bicyclists like me. But, since I come from a family of ear trumpeters, it’s incumbent on me to use my rearview mirror more than most people do. This is what my deaf dad did until he was no longer able to drive.

 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 09:34:26

An easy fix with electronic noise maker. My car emits a high pitched noise when moving at low speed.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 12:52:55

So does mine, some times.

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2011-06-27 08:02:42

“we need a debt cut not a tax cut” - eric janszen

Comment by measton
2011-06-27 09:38:31

Yesterday someone posted that tax cuts were letting people keep more of their own money

Well we should also let them keep a fair share of the US debt. The elite have benefited the most from the system with bailouts, and a military that defends their stuff and goes out and takes other peoples stuff and enforces their trade rules. One that has allowed outsourcing of jobs to their benefit and the importation of illegal and legal labor to drive down the wealth of the middle class.

Isn’t taxation to pay down the debt the same as forcing a debtor to pay his off his loans?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 11:35:24

Exactly. “keeping more of their money” is a zero sum game from a balance sheet point of view. Taxpayers pay less out of pocket, but owe more debt at the Federal level. Now of course people pay for different things out of their own pocket than they elect representatives to do on their behalf, but when were running a deficit, every extra dollar that isn’t taxed is borrowed.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 10:16:12

This plays into my ideas of cutting peoples credit card debt by $2-3000 for 1 card….its a bottom up approach to creating demand, people will hopefully spend it on deferred Needs rather then wants. a laptop vs a lapdance

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 12:33:32

I’ve got the national debt to pay off dj, I’m still not interested in funding your credit cards.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 12:43:14

I’m fine with some CC debt forgiveness, as long as the card is cancelled.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-27 13:14:21

So only irresponsible people who have run up credit card debt will benefit from this approach.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:06:38

I say make it available to anyone. Your card gets cancelled and you get a credit ding. Call it “BK Lite”.

 
Comment by michael
2011-06-27 14:14:27

“debt cut” does not mean shift it from private to public debt.

it means the bank’s take the loss…and if they fail…they fail.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 14:16:24

I know Blue i really agree with you..but ….I mean if Bernake is blowing another $300 billion, why not try blowing it on people buying things and stimulating demand. We’ve blown trillions and I cant feel any of it trickle down to me…

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 15:01:56

It is not intended to save you, me or the economy. It is simply for the banks. Cut Bernanke’s head off.

 
 
 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-06-27 11:37:49

“Gas prices meaningless to me”

Not quite, if you don’t grow your own. Even though I ride a bike, I do know that still too much of my food comes from too far away and that gas prices affect its cost upward. Don’t buy much else these days, so it doesn’t hurt too much, but still.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:07:01

Gonna get me forty and celebrate!

Oh wait… I still can’t afford it.

 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2011-06-27 03:44:34

Bank CEO sees promise here
Financial institution acquired Chestatee State in December

The CEO of one of America’s top performing banks said he sees great potential in Georgia and Forsyth County.

George Gleason, who is also chairman of Bank of the Ozarks, made a visit this week to north Georgia along with the bank’s board of directors.

“We hope to have two to three times as many offices in Georgia over the next few years,” he said, noting that the state has traditionally been real estate-driven in regards to banking.

“There are challenges, but the real estate business here is still good.”

And that’s a good fit for Bank of the Ozarks, one of whose main strengths is in real estate lending, Gleason said.

“We may be the largest bank in the country that came through the real estate market crash unscathed,” he said. “Now everyone got a few bumps and scratches, but we were able to make it basically unharmed.”

http://www.forsythnews.com/section/2/article/9141/

I beg to differ:

http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/arkansas/little-rock/bank-of-the-ozarks/

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-27 05:32:47

Yeah right…. No area was untouched by the Housing Crime Syndicate. That includes Frogballs, Arkansas and all of the Deliverance state of GA.

Make big bets Mr. Gleason…. take lots of risk.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:21:24

You, sir, are in error. The peasants in the flyover states HAVE been touched by the housing crime syndicate, though it is more accurately referred to as the Federal Reserve - Wall Street looting syndicate. All taxpayers in these benighted states, and their hapless spawn, will be paying the financial and social costs for the Republicrat’s craven and ongoing bailouts of Wall Street and the TBTF banks. And yet these same mouth-breathers continue to vote for the same Wall Street puppets who are bending them over for more Deliverance-style reamings from the banksters.

Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 07:28:00

The peasants in flyover country were ravaged by the outsourcing syndicate long before the housing syndicate was a gleam in the eye of Golden Sacks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 05:57:01

Merely a flesh wound! Latching onto the vibrant Atlanta Real Estate market is pure genius. Hey Sheila, got any more putrid failed bank assets for us to gobble up?

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-06-27 09:17:05

Wow! Check out the huge jump in their “non-accruing loans” category? It went from 19M to 106M in one year.

Think they were fudging the numbers? Maybe they had a few large construction loans (that haven’t been paying for years) suddenly run out of their “reserves”…

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 12:31:22

They also took over a bunch of failed banks from the FDIC.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 03:47:28

Yep, if’n you can getcha a Section 8 voucher, you, too, can live the good life and turn up your nose at a 1970s ranch. Oh, and you can spend your money on a couple of spoiled dogs rather than rent, perish the thought. This story just reeks of arrogance and entitlement.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/housing-vouchers-a-golden-ticket-to-pricey-suburbs/2011/06/23/AGDNc7kH_story.html

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:07:51

I wish that Section 8 scum could only be housed next to registered Republicrats who continue to vote for such government social engineering and meddling in the housing markets.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 06:44:01

Amen, brothah! Frankly, I was surprised at the way the story was written. The reporter has a fine sense of the absurd and there is a somewhat sarcastic tone to it. WaPo usually glorifies this sort of thing. Maybe the reporter has had enuf, too.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:58:04

Some of the beat reporters, unlike their bosses who live in secure guarded enclaves, are probably getting a dose of reality that contradicts the PC editorial line they must adhere to if they expect to keep their jobs. A case in point: Emily Guendelsberger, 27, city editor for local arts and entertainment content for the Onion, just got a beat-down at the hands of wilding “youth” in Philly. She might be less receptive to spouting doctrinaire liberalism once she recovers from her injuries.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110627_Woman_s_leg_broken__others_hurt_in_Spring_Garden_mob_attack.html

A WOMAN’S leg was broken and several other people were injured Saturday night when a large group of teens accosted pedestrians in Spring Garden, police and witnesses said.
Philadelphia police responded to two reports of pedestrians being assaulted by a large group of young people along Broad Street about 9:30 p.m.

One of those reports came from Emily Guendelsberger, 27, city editor for local arts and entertainment content for the Onion, the satirical newspaper and website. She was walking with seven friends on Green Street near Broad when they were accosted, she said. Guendelsberger, who remained hospitalized with a broken leg yesterday, declined to comment further.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Montana
2011-06-27 08:39:56

Seems to be something missing from that story.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:22:18

I’m sure it will be funnier when the Onion runs it.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-27 13:36:30

It’s going to be a long, hot summer. I heard unemployment is about 50% among black youth (Tavis Smiley - PBS). Among all youth it is about half that.

Nowhere to go and nothing to do is a recipe for trouble. I foresee more spending on prisons.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:12:29

It wasn’t “liberalism” that sent jobs offshore.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-06-27 06:44:56

I know a guy renting town homes to Section 8 people for $1,400 a month. The last unit I saw for sale in that complex was listed for sale @ $54k.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-06-27 07:33:03

From the article

CHARLOTTE — It was clear that Liza Jackson’s luck had changed when she drove her pearl-white Dodge sedan, the one with the huge pink plastic eyelashes over the headlights, into Pinebrook, an eight-year-old subdivision where residents tend to notice cars with huge pink eyelashes.

“There goes the neighborhood,” one homeowner said when she heard that her potential new neighbor had a federal housing voucher known as a Section 8.

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:30:52

How did she qualify for section 8? She had a job, apartment in Hawaii. And her daughter is 24.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 09:31:44

The sister of a former neighbor rented to Section 8 tenants in Ohio. She told me that she had the greatest success with Section 8-ers who were new to the program. Unfortunately, the “veterans” gave her nothing but problems.

When she moved to AZ, she got out of the Section 8 house-renting biz. And she didn’t miss it.

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 13:03:33

From the article:

After several days of looking, Jackson had seen at least a dozen houses that were supposed to represent the rewards of middle-class betterment but that were beginning to strike her as a bit shabby or “peasy.”

She did not want some of the peasy carpet she’d seen, or peasy refrigerators or dented, peasy front doors.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 03:55:49

Well, well, well. What have we here? The former chief panty sniffer at Lehman is now the treasurer for the World Bank!!!! All I can say is, I hope the b*tch does for the World Bank what she did for Lehman. L.M.A.O.

http://www.bankingtimes.co.uk/2011/06/25/ex-lehman-chief-risk-officer-appointed-world-bank-treasurer/

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-06-27 08:12:37

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!

That’s almost too good. Because she did _SUCH_ a great job of managing risk at Lehman! :-) :-) :-)

 
Comment by chilidoggg
2011-06-27 20:16:52

I looked up “panty sniffer” at urbandictionary and could find no entry for use as a derogatory term for a woman.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 04:11:23

Another section 8 story, this time from LA county. Relocating folks to the burbs. That’s EXACTLY what’s been happening around here. I spoke with a couple over the weekend who live in a relatively nice development, part of which went Section 8. Needless to say, they’re not too happy about it. Can you imagine being a schmuck still paying a high mortgage in a supposed upscale community, only to find your neighbors are Section 8? That’s gotta hurt.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/22/local/la-me-section-eight-20110622

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:10:17

I know someone who was trying to apply for Section 8 housing in SoCal. Turns out that the waiting list in most counties is up to 5 years long. In Orange County they stopped accepting applications altogether.

Just took a looksie in wikipedia:

In many localities, the PHA waiting lists for Section 8 vouchers may be thousands of families long, waits of three to six years to access vouchers is common, and many lists are closed to new applicants. When wait lists are briefly opened (often for just five days), which may occur as little as once every seven years, there can be as many as 100,000 applicants for 10,000 spots on the waitlist, with spots being awarded on the basis of weighted or non-weighted lotteries, with priority sometimes given to local residents, the disabled, veterans, and the elderly.[9][10] There is no guarantee that anyone will ever receive a spot on the waiting list.

Comment by wolfgirl
2011-06-27 06:55:16

I’ve heard that in the part of South Carolina where I live, that Section 8 applications haven’t been accepted in about 5 years. That works for me.

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 10:38:06

Wolf I used to live in Columbia and Charleston….so I never understood with so much land and so many trailer parks in SC why do you give section 8 people an actual house to live in…?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:15:24

Where I’m at the trailer park won’t allow renting specifically to avoid all those issues. You can’t get in unless you have cash or good enough credit to finance a place, AND you have to pass a background check. The neighborhood is a lot nicer (other than that you’re living in a glorified camper trailer) than the section 8 rental neighborhoods.

 
Comment by wolfgirl
2011-06-27 18:07:38

I’m not sure what goes through the minds of decision makers in this state. Some days I think nothing at all. Certainly the screening for section 8 leaves something to be desired.I once worked with a womanwho was a low level manager a Burger King and who worked another job part-time. She was living in what sounded like a nice apartment on SEction 8 funding. I know of a woman with zero income i a 2 bedroom house–only officially her although two other people live there. She has np incpme and goes to charities including churches to pay her power bill each month.

BTW, I’m in the Greenville area because it’s where my husband is from. We hope to move in a couple of years as we really are not fond of the area.

It’s getting hard to find trailer courts around here although there are still some.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 21:51:19

Come to think of it FEMA has thousands of unused trailers….

But I guess the ACLU will sue for some minor reason like the stigma of being given a trailer rent free…and you having to pay the electric bill…

Yes its maddening to live in an area where the educational level is not very high.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 07:12:43

Thanks for that, Colorado. Puts it in more perspective for me. I do tend to lump in Section 8 with other subsidized housing. Subsidized housing developments are indeed different than Section 8. Under the former, you are given a narrow choice of developments that are under subsidy by designation. We’ve got ten of these now in my area, that I know of. Both rental and ownership.

The interesting thing is that I’ve been hearing about areas that have “gone Section 8″. Which, from your information, I take to mean that they are eligible for Section 8 residents, but doesn’t mean they’ll get them.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 08:32:46

Correct. In the end, the vouchers have to somehow be funded. With declining tax bases that will become a challenge, to say the least.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 10:15:11

Subisdized housing

is also a gift to the rich.
They don’t have to pay labor a living wage and can use tax dollars from the masses to keep housing costs down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-06-27 11:03:30

I think a problem is that many go in to Section 8, but none ever come out.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 11:09:53

And this is a problem that government alone can’t solve. It’s going to take charitable organizations, religious institutions, non-profit organizations, and just plain old people who care.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:18:22

Kind of hard to get back on your feet when millions jobs get offshored

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:17:04

“Can you imagine being a schmuck still paying a high mortgage in a supposed upscale community, only to find your neighbors are Section 8? That’s gotta hurt.”

If you were that schmuck who supported Republican polices of offshoring jobs and suppressing wages, I said it’s poetic justice. :lol:

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:19:24

Dear god, I cannot type today. :lol:

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 04:22:44

Peorians living in fear

This eye-witness account is from Paul Wilkinson, president of the Altamont Park Neighborhood Association:

Tonight, around 11 p.m., a group of at least 60-70 African American youth marched down one of the side streets (W. Thrush) to the 4 lane main drag (Sheridan). They were yelling threats to white residents. Things such as we need to kill alll the white people around here. They were physically intimidating anyone calling for help from the police. They were surrounding cars. Cars on the main drag had to slam on their brakes to either avoid the youth blocking not only all four lanes, but a large section of the side street as well. fights were breaking out among them. They were rushing residents who looked out their doors, going on to porches, yelling threats to people calling the police for help.

Cars were doing U turns on the streets just to avoid the mob, mostly male. One youth stated his grandfather was white and several assaulted him on the spot. One police officer answered the call. The youth split into two large groups, one heading north, the other south. They were also yelling racial threats to the police officer but he was outnumbered. Another police car did not show up until after the youth finally dispersed and the patty wagon (van) also eventually showed up.

Residents are very shaken, both black and white alike. This is the fifth large mob action in about a month with smaller groups of 10-12 are out threatening children and adults a few evenings a week or later into the night. The times vary, even occuring during the day. In talking to the police officer, they are short staffed. Residents were advised to simply keep inside and to lock their doors. In other words buckle down, it’s not even safe to sit on your porch or go into your yards.

“The fifth large mob action in about a month.” Wow. This is really outrageous. Why is this neighborhood having to put up with this? “Residents were advised to simply keep inside and to lock their doors”? Seriously? That’s the best we can do for our fellow citizens’ safety?

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 06:05:33

“In talking to the police officer, they are short staffed.”

More short staffing is soon to come because of budget cuts.

Got guns?

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:33:41

Short staffed? I bet there are many jobs at the station house that can be turned over to civilians.

 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 10:19:57

We have to cut police services and release prisoners so that we can cut taxes for the elite and bail them out when their investments go bad.

In my view jailing those that are violent is one of the best jobs programs around. It removes the violent offender from the unemployment list and the jailor.

This is going to be a major factor in the future, and one that the HBB’rs have been talking about for years. In 10 years or more we will look a lot like Mexico.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:09:32

Look how many flash mob attacks have gone down in the US lately. Of course the MSM calls them “teens” and strenuously avoids any mention of who is being singled out for attack.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:12:48

Racially “undiverse” communities might become more popular if this continues.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 06:13:27

Yay! We’re finally getting to the pitchfork stage, right? It’s what many have called for. And then it starts happening, and those same people poop their pants.

(BTW, I think this story, reported only on survivalist/conspiracy websites, is a crock. But it’s a revealing one.)

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 07:07:57

“I think this story, reported only on survivalist/conspiracy websites,”

How do you know? I posted Takimag’s listing of the various flash mob actions around the country during the Memorial Day weekend, all aggregated from the MSM (yeah, and btw, since when does something reported or not reported in the MSM give it legitimacy? We were considered a bunch of nutjobs here at the HBB not too long ago. Clearly, our views on the housing bubble were as nutty as they come, right? What was happening wasn’t really happening, right? So why are you on a “conspiracy” website yourself?) These stories are being heavily suppressed. Illinois is the state getting the most action, it would appear, so much so, that the Chicago Trib actually published an editorial justifying why they weren’t mentioning the race of those involved in the flash mobs.

And no, I’m not gonna give you all sorts of links. Research it yourself. You know how to use google. I’m assuming, anyway.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 07:35:39

I did research it, and found no sources that weren’t dubious, and they all referenced a single eyewitness. No photos, which is odd, since it’s said to be a recurring thing (actually one had a photo of black kids running, but no caption, which I makes me think it was a stock photo, which is what it looked like). I don’t doubt there are flash mobs, or wildings, or whatever, I just doubted this report.

But weren’t we calling for pitchforks? This is what it looks like.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 07:46:00

“found no sources that weren’t dubious, and they all referenced a single eyewitness.”

Dubious maybe in your opinion. As to single eyewitnesses, maybe he/she was the only one willing to talk. After reading about the Knoxville Horror massacre, I would probably feel the same. (Nicholas Stix has been following that one, and aggregating all the suppressed news on it)

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 07:48:48

Why are you against the pitchfork stage?

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-06-27 08:19:36

“But weren’t we calling for pitchforks? This is what it looks like.”

No, this is NOT what “pitchforks” is supposed to look like. Pitchforks were supposed to be used on BANKSTERS only, not random passers-by. The revolt is supposed to be against the corruption in the system, not society at large.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 08:38:59

The revolt is supposed to be against the corruption in the system, not society at large.

The unwashed can’t tell the difference. Do we think for a moment that the rioters even know what the Federal Reserve is or understand offshoring?

All they know is that they see white people driving nice cars, so it’s “get ‘em!”.

Revolutions tend to be messy affairs. The American Revolution was less so because it was spearheaded by the landed gentry. The only spears today’s wealthy Americans are interested in are the ones at the Brazilian steakhouses.

 
Comment by polly
2011-06-27 08:49:34

The banksters that are responsible have very few representatives in Peoria, and getting to New York costs money and takes time. You can’t decide that civil unrest is a good thing and then complain when the people you want to feel intimidated aren’t the targets.

If people are angry at home, that is where they will act on that anger.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 09:56:33

I know I have a weird set of values, but this flash mob BS (true or not) is one reason *I DO* like Florida’s relaxed carry laws.

BANG.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-06-27 11:31:55

Just to be clear, I have never advocated violence as a means of political change.

I’m not trying to advocate “pitchforks”—merely trying to explain that it does not necessarily mean wide-spread mayhem and random violence.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:18:27

I’m not trying to advocate “pitchforks”—merely trying to explain that it does not necessarily mean wide-spread mayhem and random violence.

In an ideal world, sure. In the kind of world where the pitchforks are coming out mayhem is highly likely, at least in more populated places.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 14:35:26

Gentrifiers are the spearhead of the REIC. Shouldn’t they be pitchforked?

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 07:38:34

Weather forecast for the upcoming holiday weekend in the Windy City is for highs in the 90s. There will be fresh material next Tuesday.

Local blogs have been ablaze with these stories and the local PTB, with the help of compliant outlets such as the aforementioned Tribune, have been running a full court press to assure tourists and suburbanites that our biggest festival - The Taste of Chicago is safe.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 08:03:36

Here’s a little holiday mayhem video for those who doubt this sort of thing happens. VERY diverse. Note the general ‘tude of the police.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptHAhnPXxOI

 
Comment by Elanor
2011-06-27 08:44:09

Nothing could persuade me to attend Taste this year. And just imagine it when Illinois inevitably bows to pressure and allows concealed carry!

 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-27 14:27:28

“Research it yourself. You know how to use google.

I heard an interesting report on NPR about how the results that one person sees on google are not necessarily the same as what someone else will see. Google has a relevancy algorithm that uses past searches to determine what results to return. You can’t assume that alpha-sloth will see what you see from google.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:24:35

Google is slowing going to crap for search. They have let current news bleed over to general search, when they already have a specific category for news.

 
 
 
 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 06:13:48

funny how there is never any “hate crimes” when its black on white, or any color or thing vs white.

the whole concept of hate crimes blows, another affirmative action program if you ask me.

this story reminds me of going to the “hill district” in pittsburgh in the 1960s.

msm, obama and his ilk have been teaching the blacks that they are taken advantage of and in need of joe the plummer’s earnings.

obama has brought racism back in a big way. i’ve learned i’m a racist here on this blog, you either support his re-distributive policies or you are a racist.

time for new leadership

Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 08:23:49

“If we’re serious about reclaiming that dream, we [blacks] have to do more in our own lives, our own families and our own communities…That starts with providing the guidance our children need, turning off the TV and putting away the video games; attending those parent-teacher conferences, helping our children with their homework and setting a good example.”

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-07-14-obama-naacp_N.htm

Admittedly, that was from Candidate Obama’s famous speech to the NAACP in July 2008, the one that Jesse Jackson wanted to “castrate” Obama for. After he became President, Obama was more subtle (likely because he was busy with being President): Here’s one from 2009:

Andre Showell of BET: And in New York City, for example, the black unemployment rate for men is near 50 percent. My question to you tonight is: given this unique and desperate circumstance, what specific policies can you point to that will target these communities and what’s the timetable for us to see tangible results?

President Obama: So my general approach is that if the economy is strong, that will lift all boats as long as it is also supported by, for example, strategies around college affordability and job training, tax cuts for working families as opposed to the wealthiest that level the playing field and ensure bottom-up economic growth.

http://newsone.com/nation/cganemccalla/obama-addresses-black-unemployment-at-press-conference/

I remember a town hall where one black guy started shouting that Obama wasn’t doing enough in government and that it was time to change government. Obama replied that if the guy wanted to change government, he had the option of running for public office himself, just as he had. It got a lot of press at the time, but I can’t find a link for it.

There isn’t much press on this topic after 2009, maybe because the black community realized that Obama was not going to give any one race any favoritism?

Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 09:36:10
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 10:40:07

That was clear discrimination against black from the past, decided in a court case. Blacks were being brought up to even, not given extra favors.

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-06-27 11:00:32

So, so, so many victims!

 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 13:23:22

“That was clear discrimination against black from the past, decided in a court case. Blacks were being brought up to even, not given extra favors.”

ah thanks for the clarification. but wait a minute, they compensated many blacks that were not farmers, it was a big give away.

the article above claims we only owe another $97Trillion and they we will be even!

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-06-27 13:28:00

“That was clear discrimination against black from the past, decided in a court case. Blacks were being brought up to even, not given extra favors.”

Nothing at all clear about this discrimination claim. A feel good, guilt leavening response to PC view.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 09:40:45

Right now, I’m watching the house of some black neighbors who’ve gone out of town to visit relatives.

The father of this family died six years ago, and he’s still missed around here. When the kids were growing up, he’d demand to know what they had to do for homework. And if they didn’t have homework, they’d better have a book to read.

All three of those kids grew into fine, upstanding adults. One of them speaks five languages.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 09:41:54
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 10:11:13

Green is beautiful.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 09:38:01

this story reminds me of going to the “hill district” in pittsburgh in the 1960s.

I used to live across the valley from the Hill District. In Garfield, which was another one of Pittsburgh’s predominantly black neighborhoods.

Truth be told, it was one of the friendliest places I’ve ever lived. I still have a very special place in my heart for the impromptu cheering sections that would urge me to c’mon, keep going as I pedaled up North Atlantic Avenue. (That’s a pretty steep hill, even by Pittsburgh standards.)

Not to mention going up the top of the hill to the projects. For some of Mrs. Z’s home-made wine. Good stuff!

Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 10:20:44

slim

i started out in lawrenceville across from arsenal park.

we were almost neighbors but maybe about a decade apart.

i appreciate your anecdotal evidence that black people are good people and if you feel a need to respond with that then i guess my point isn’t being heard.

i sit here today, 40 years later, suffering symptoms from having my skull broken with a brick and my brain damaged. back in my day race riots where going down in pittsburgh.

i have no animosity, no individual predjudice, but i detest the trend to teach minorities that they are due wealth from the majority, i’m proposing that these teachings incite violence, from where i sit we are heading back to the 60’s as a result.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 10:53:15

Charlie is not racism anymore its personal choice…we have achieved MLK dream of being judged by the content of your character…..but many minorities have a horrible content of character.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-27 16:29:40

“not racism anymore its personal choice”

I would suggest that most white people are unaware of the extent of racism that still exists. It is not directed at us and we simply do not see it.

In many cases, black people don’t see it either. Housing discrimination is not out in the open - blacks are told that the rental is no longer available when whites find that it is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 22:00:57

Happy:

You know I am harping on forcing all people to read, write and speak English.

Because i believe that black people are discriminated far far more on their poor English “skilzzzz”, then on the color of their skin.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-06-28 16:00:49

Got it. I would agree with you that people will do better in life if they know how to read, write and speak formal English.

That does not mean that they should not also know how to speak the vernacular of their sub-culture.

 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:27:18

“Hate crimes” are specifically unconstitutional under “equal protection” of the law and, has it’s also been in some cases, freedom of speech.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:15:12

Cops just like to harrass law abiding citizens, writing them up because they didn’t see the new lower speed limit sign. It’s much safer and it generates revenue.

Protecting the citizenry is dangerous and unprofitable. You can’t collect that cushy pension if you get killed.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 06:52:05

You sure? It appears to me that protecting citizenry is very profitable - especially when you’re talking about whole nations.

We the people wrote a blank check to the miltary industrial complex ten years ago. (after the funds for the previous one - Cold War - ran out.) Law enforcement has also figured out the formula - only scaled it down.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 07:11:06

But the cops are smarter than the GIs. They have unions and they spend the bulk of their time doing relatively safe work: writing speeding tickets. Sure, it isn’t risk free, but I’ve noticed that when a shady type gets pulled over there are often three cruisers at the scene.

Going after real bad guys is much more dangerous, and the cops know it, which is why they try to avoid it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 07:26:45

Having bad guys around, if they are essentially harmless to the state (not to ondividual citizens) are very lucrative.

So long as these local uprisings do not take on a political voice or adopt any type of platform that might compete with the two party system (or simply with the local entrenched career pols) the response will be milquetoast.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:39:40

I have a friend that is a DARE officer. He hates the summers when he has to hit the mean streets.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 07:01:19

The whole legal system is on a for-profit basis, designed to generate lucrative earnings for lawyers, judges, and the prison-industrial complex money while caring nothing about justice, protecting the innocent, or punishing the guilty.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-06-27 07:44:35

pri$on-industrial complex Inc. ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 10:31:09

I’d say just a bit of an overstatement.

Plenty of guilty people in jail and many more getting out of jail way too early. The greedy feed on any system with money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by GH
2011-06-27 10:35:11

It is a free country the government can do what it wants.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 22:04:31

….ESPECIALLY keeping pot illegal…..There was a law firm in Charleston that had 5 rolls royces and defended every major Colombian drug dealer…..not much accountability on their “fees”

lucrative earnings for lawyers

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 07:00:42

Just wait until somebody starts taking video of mobs of African American youths beating up white folks just for being white, and sending it to the news. You think it will get the same coverage as the Rodney King beating? Will it be mentioned on the Floor of the Senate?

Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 07:06:15

Woman’s leg broken, others hurt in Spring Garden mob attack

comment from below article

“Hate crime? No. You see, according to Eric Holder, the Atty. Gen. under Obama, it would only be a hate crime if the perps were white. Since the perps are black in this case ( and every known case in Phila of mob violence)..it’s now called “Redistribution of Wealth….with a little “payback for slavery days” thrown in. Keep voting Dem. white people. It’s like you are paying for the rope that will hang you someday.
— Virgil (The Turk) Sollozzo”

Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 07:38:50

Except that while the ancestors of these flash mobs were experiencing slavery days, my ancestors were starving in Southern and Eastern Europe.

And if it were really payback, then why would the African Americans flash mob in Philly, which was a Union city?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 08:06:51

when one incites violence, logic can be omitted.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 07:07:41

They’ll probably get arrested for videotaping the crimes. They’ll be charged with “hate crimes”.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 07:47:20

Considering that lots of people have spent the last two decades videotaping household pets and relatives in various humorous poses and situations. It will take them a while to put all that A/V hardware to use.

 
 
Comment by Steve W
2011-06-27 07:13:05

The local newspaper (Peoria Journal Star) in essence said that Paul Wilkinson is a crackpot. I’m suspecting this particular event was a nonevent.

That being said, I walk down Michigan avenue (in Chicago) back and forth from work each day–pretty much ground zero as to where the “flash mob” has been lately. On Tuesday, after walking 4 blocks down the Mag Mile I counted 18 policemen. No exaggeration.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 11:30:42

“The local newspaper (Peoria Journal Star) in essence said that Paul Wilkinson is a crackpot.”

What was their take on the housing bubble?

 
 
Comment by CharlieTango
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 10:13:39

I have experienced many of these large disruptions, and there is only one way to effectively handle it: separate the two waring factions ASAP and make them disappear (I see 2 primary aggressors in this video and two secondary). Once they’re gone, the party is over.

You can’t control the crowd, so you grab the leaders.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 10:16:32

Be very afraid!

Violent crime falls 5.5% in U.S.
By JEFF BLISS Bloomberg News
May 23, 2011, 9:03AM
Chronicledotcom

Violent crime in the U.S. fell in 2010 for the fourth year in a row, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said in a preliminary report.

Today’s report showed violent crime decreased 5.5 percent compared with 2009, while property crime declined 2.8 percent. All four of the violent crime categories — forcible rape, robbery, murder and non-negligent manslaughter, and aggravated assault — fell last year, the report said.

Murder and non-negligent manslaughter declined 4.4 percent, rape was down 4.2 percent, robbery plunged 9.5 percent and aggravated assault 3.6 percent, according to the FBI.

All property crime categories — larceny and theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft — decreased, according to the FBI.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 11:47:09

“the Federal Bureau of Investigation said in a preliminary report.”

There’s a reliable source!!!

Let me tell you what I see with my own lyin’ eyes, locally:

1) Attempted break in right across the back alley from me a month ago. My buddy caught the guy in the act. Unheard of in this area before.

2) Extra cameras all over the place at the local big box stores. Why? “They” (store management) says it’s because theft is up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 12:27:25

Ah, statistics….

FWIW, to hear our local cops tell it, the brass learned to game the system just like their banker counterparts. Our former Police Super, himself a former FBI man (Weis), was rumored to be a proponent of this approach. As a result, many crimes went “under-reported” - they simply were assigned into non-violent or otherwise lesser crime categories - or the victims were convinced not to file a report. This approach made everyone from the beat commander to the local pols look good, not to mention it was easier in many ways.

During the recent spate of highly publicized mob crimes here, local blogs - ran by or frequented by cops - strongly suggest that many victims decline to file any compliants. They simply wipe off the blood and go home. Sometimes the responding officers even encourage them to do so - such is their feeling towards the Cook County criminal justice system. The feeling being that any trial will just add to the trauma. A few victims even allege they were coerced not to make a report, still others say they were merely cajoled into not doing so.

So, there are statistics and there are stories. If one listens to the stories one might easily be afraid to leave the house. OTOH, the state issues plenty of statisitcs that suggest we should all be better off and safer than we might actually feel. It’s up to the individual to decide and respond accordingly.

Bringing it back to housing, it is worth noting that a lot of the real estate that changed hands during the boom here did so during a comparatively more placid time on the streets. Statistics or not, the mood here has changed dramatically - perhaps rationally and perhaps not. Bottom line, the gentrifiers didn’t shell out the boomtime money they did for the city as it is perceived today. The effect this will have on house prices remains to be seen but is certainly worthy of observation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-06-27 10:02:50

They need to send more government checks quick!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 04:35:15

We have a bit of cliff-hanger going on in South Carolina at the moment, and it has to do with financial austerity. Governor Nikki Haley must sign off on the state budget before Wednesday, OR veto all or parts of it. The Republican Party is on pins and needles because she may not okay taxpayer funds for the GOP’s state primary election. The political club would be forced to hold a meeting to pick its nominees instead of opening the voting places with taxpayers footing part of the bill.

And the S.C. Arts Commission is fearful Haley may nix $2.1 million the legislature approved for its operation. The Commission has mounted a vigorous campaign to show that if it can’t continue its operation the arts will fall into the hands of well-to-do and the rest of us will have to do without. ??

This is a tough call for the young governor, and it’ll be a big test of her nerve. All the states in the union are facing financial headwinds and the danger of the economy slumping back into recession is not over, despite wishful thinking on almost everybody’s part. It’s imperative that state and local governments cinch in their belts, bite the bullets, and live within the taxpayers’ means - which are very apt to become surprisingly slender in the second half of this year.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 09:20:40

Here in the Centennial state cutbacks have been a way of life for the past 10 years. The main difference was that at one point they only had to shave 100 million off the budget on a given year, and now they’ve been talking bigger numbers these past few years sometimes approaching a billion.

Keep in mind that Colorado is a “small” state with just 5 million people, so 1 billion has a big impact, especially when you consider that we are one of the lowest spending states per capita (we’re right there with Texas) in the country.

 
 
Comment by bink
2011-06-27 04:44:19

My father in law is a geologist who lives in the backwoods of Pennsylvania. He’s now talking about having to move out of his retirement/dream home due to fracking. He says numerous ground water supplies have already been contaminated.

This article reads like it was written by the oil and gas industry. Unfortunately, I know about as much about geology as I do ancient Japanese culture.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303936704576398462932810874.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Maybe moving to Oil City wasn’t a great idea after all.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-06-27 07:46:44

Sorry to hear about that bink.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 15:21:23

Fracking is awful. I can’t believe it was allowed to go on for so long.

Another problem “the market” solved.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 15:42:27

“Another problem “the market” solved.”

The frackers would never do anything to hurt the environment, because it would hurt their own reputations! (*snicker*)

Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 16:20:31

Abolish the EPA!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 04:45:05

We have this thing…Called a digital printing press.

Fed May Buy $300 Billion in Treasuries After QE2
(Bloomberg)

The U.S. Federal Reserve, which injected $2.3 trillion into the financial system after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September 2008, will keep buying Treasuries to keep market rates down as the economy slows.

The Federal Reserve will remain the biggest buyer of Treasuries, even after the second round of quantitative easing ends this week, as the central bank uses its $2.86 trillion balance sheet to keep interest rates low.

While the $600 billion purchase program, known as QE2, winds down, the Fed said June 22 that it will continue to buy Treasuries with proceeds from the maturing debt it currently owns. That could mean purchases of as much as $300 billion of government debt over the next 12 months without adding money to the financial system.

The central bank, which injected $2.3 trillion into the financial system after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September 2008, will continue buying Treasuries to keep market rates down as the economy slows. The purchases are supporting demand at bond auctions while President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress struggle to close the gap between federal spending and income by between $2 trillion and $4 trillion.

“I don’t think the Fed wants to remove accommodation in any way, shape or form,” said Matt Toms, the head of U.S. public fixed-income investments at Atlanta-based ING Investment Management, which oversees more than $500 billion. “It’s quite natural for them to reinvest cash,” he said. “That effectively maintains the accommodative stance.”

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 11:38:33

100 million credit cards reduced by $3000 is $300 Billion…

————————-
While the $600 billion purchase program, known as QE2, winds down

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 12:49:50

Like I said, I’d be for that if the credit cards got cancelled and a credit ding was attached (so they don’t just go out and get another CC). That way they could spend the interest they used to pay to Citi, Chase or Wells Fargo on groceries or gas.

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-06-27 13:16:28

So you think those of us who have NO credit card debt should subsidize the people who can’t or don’t control their finances. I guess this correlates to the current thinking whereby renters and people with no mortgage have to subsidize get-rich-quick home-moaners who got in over their head.
Wouldn’t just dropping a few hundred billion dollars from the sky do the trick also? After all, we have a candy crapping unicorn in charge. Free Cheese! Free Cheese!

Once again, so, so, so, so many victims!

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:08:19

Just saying that if there is debt forgiveness that there should be strings attached.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 22:18:26

YES …..good show ….let tan man off the hook for $100 mill but kill millions of Americans credit over a lousy $3000….that sounds fair.

We should not help pay for student loans which i could have easily racked up in the last few years, by staying off this board.

And we should only help people who took out heloc or refied to use as a necessary expense such as to save the life of a spouse or child. Or to build an addition when the wifey suddenly has triplets and you have a 2 bedroom house.

No help for his and hers SUV’s botox or the booob job for the old bag.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:16:54

Time will tell. Of course, if we leave the same congresscritters in place he won’t be able to do anything.

 
Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-06-27 06:46:56

1. Too few are waking up to be of any danger to our financial elites.
2. Our political system favors the status quo. It is virtually impossible to start a new political movement. If it could pose any danger to the ruling elites the movement is immediatly highjacked by the establishment and defused, see Tea Party.
3. The powers in charge are too entrenched to be dislodged by peaceful means. Miami for example. We just voted out corrupt mayor Alvareaz in re-call election. I think 88% voted against him. Now we have 2 new candidates Gimenez (union thug) and Roubaina (mobster) who are just as corrupt as the guy we just got rid off.
Sorry for being so pessimitic.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-06-27 17:02:27

Now we have 2 new candidates Gimenez (union thug) and Roubaina (mobster) who are just as corrupt as the guy we just got rid off.

Sorry for being so pessimitic.

I don’t think this is pessimistic because if you realize the whole system is corrupt you realize the only candidates even presented to the masses have already been vetted through the corrupt system. How could you ever believe a savior was going to be coming from that?

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 06:50:35

“Are the sheeple finally waking up?”

Surprisingly, yes. I was reading a story on Tampabay.com (St. Pete Times website) about an elderly man in Tampa who left his home to visit a relative in New Mexico. He came back to find it had been completely emptied by one of those trash-out companies the banks use when taking a foreclosure, and padlocked. All his possessions gone. Problem is, he wasn’t in foreclosure and the trash-out company had the wrong address. BofA ordered the action.

The reader comments were intelligent, for a change. Lots of talk about ending the Fed, and lots of knowledge on the issue. Music to my ears.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 07:03:29

I’ve noticed for awhile that reader comments to MSM stories like this are a lot more enlightening and on target than the articles themselves. Music to my ears as well.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 09:49:27

“The lower-level people were saying, ‘It had to be us. We had a work order to go out to 4255,’ ” Santiago Jr. said.

His father’s mailbox could have caused confusion.

On one side, it displayed the number “4205.” But on the other side, the “0″ was missing.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/civil/tampa-retiree-says-he-lost-belongings-in-foreclosure-blunder/1177248

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 11:49:57

Sure. A number is missing, so let’s just take a guess what the real number might be, and trash it out.

As noted in the comments, that’s what public records and maps are for. Verification.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 12:19:36

Gotta contract it out to the lowest bidder. Whaddya want, some government regulation that says they have to do x, y, and z?

Get the bums out! No time for legal niceties! Robo-sign it, and trash it (or one near it) out!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 15:34:34

They knew. They damn well knew it was the wrong address. They stole his property, plain and simple.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 04:57:53

Why China is headed for a hard landing, Part 1. (Gary Shilling) (Bloomibergi)

China’s labor force is aging. Its consumers save too much and spend too little. Its political and economic policy tools remain crude. Its state bureaucracy seems likely to curb spending just as exports weaken, and thus risks deflation. … Even China’s middle and upper classes had only 6 percent of Americans’ purchasing power.

…[China] believes in the misguided concept of global decoupling — the idea that even if the U.S. economy suffers a setback, the rest of the world, especially developing countries such as China and India, will continue to flourish.

This concept is flawed for a simple reason: Almost all developing countries depend on exports for growth…the majority of exports by Asian countries go directly or indirectly to the U.S. … Wages remained low, due to ample labor supplies, and held down consumer spending… [So the Chinese have their own version of under $500/week. Whoda thunk.]

…But before you worry about China’s becoming No. 1 any time soon, consider the remaining gap between its economy and the U.S. economy. In 2009, China’s GDP $3,709 [per capita] was only 8 percent of the U.S.’s $46,405.

=======

China achieved most of its growth by selling exports to the US. If the US suddenly stops spending (likely, and soon), then the Chinese will realize that they can’t have their own consumer economy because they don’t have any good consuemrs. China will either have to blow up a debt bubble for people to buy the stuff, or stop making the stuff (layoffs). Then what will happen to those workers packed into those overpriced sardine flats in Beijing?

I’m just a silly lib, but have the Chinese considered cutting corporate taxes and getting rid of insane regulations? That why they can all keep their jobs even without consumer demand!

:roll:

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 06:15:35

Yep.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:20:57

Globalism is about to hit a brick wall. Between broke Americans and economic crisis in the Eurozone Asian exports can only go down. Latin Americans remain protectionist (especially Brazil), so China shouldn’t count on them to pick up the slack.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 06:55:05

Exactly, sounds like the consumers of the world aren’t living up to the dreams of the bankers. Oh those cockeyed optimists, those bankers, they keep watering that tree hoping it’ll grow to the sky.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 07:22:47

“those bankers, they keep watering that tree hoping it’ll grow to the sky.”

I don’t think urine is the best choice of moisture, although it works for jellyfish stings.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 10:38:20

Oh those cockeyed optimists, those bankers, they keep watering that tree hoping it’ll grow to the sky

That’s just it the bankers haven’t been watering the tree they’ve been diverting the water to their swimming pool. Now they wonder why the tree won’t grow. Actually I suspect those at the very top know why the tree won’t grow and plan on burning the tree for firewood once it collapses.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 06:59:13

Eff globalization. With. A. Stick.

Comment by CharlieTango
2011-06-27 08:25:59

i have always advocated free trade.

i’m re-thinking my position

guess it doesn’t work out when the playing field is tilted steeply

question is, can you go back if you want to at this point?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 08:56:58

question is, can you go back if you want to at this point?

There may be no other option. If you don’t have anything to trade for what you need then you need to start making your own stuff.

I’m sure the Asians and the Banksters thought that lopsided trade was great. Now our “trading partners” have wheelbarrels full of our IOUs and are beginning to worry about just how much they are really worth.

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-06-27 17:08:53

Don’t forget peak oil and rising transportation prices. Heh heh. I’ve been enjoying all my favorite globally sourced food stuffs while they’re still available. I suppose after that it’s back to grandma’s depression era supper recipes.

 
 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-06-27 07:34:28

China’s labor force is aging. It’s consumers save too much and spend too little.
—————
I’m tired of this being cast out as a negative. So let’s get the story right: The chinese big business economy may be in for a hard landing, but the regular people will be just fine.

I guess they peaked over to the US, and saw that the US big business economy was being bailed out, but the little people were being screwed.

“insanity is doing the same thing but expecting different results”.

I guess the insane Chinese are the ones buying Canadian housing.

Comment by polly
2011-06-27 09:00:05

If I lived in a country that had no retirement support and had been enforcing one child per couple for nearly two generations, I’d save a lot too.

Well, I save a lot anyway, but seriously, a young couple might be responsible for helping 4 parents and 8 grandparents as well as their own child. That is a lot of aging people depending on help from fewer and fewer younger people. Everyone in that scenario needs to be saving a lot.

Comment by WT Economist
2011-06-27 10:25:12

Yeah, but would you invest it in the USA?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-06-27 07:50:02

1.34 Billions

verses:

314 Millions

Place your bet$ on personal & financial security folks! :-)

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:27:06

“China achieved most of its growth by selling exports to the US.”

Again, this is misinformation.

China also has strong exports to the EU, S. America, Japan and Russia.

They CAN feel our pain, but it’s not enough to cripple them.

I’m still not sure what of the purpose of this misinformation, but I’ll eventually find out.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:29:02

Dyslexic day. :lol:

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 05:04:53

Saved by China?

China business:By Malcolm Moore, in Shanghai, Peter Foster in Beijing and Andrew Cave in London
Enter the dragon ‘to save the euro’

It is in the interest of cash-rich China to help resolve the eurozone debt crisis, but Chinese premier Wen Jiabao, who is visiting Britain and Continental Europe, will want a share of the West’s buying power in return .

Chinese premier Wen Jiabao realised that his economy needs struggling Europe to keep buying its goods.

As Wen Jiabao, the Chinese premier, stepped off his plane in Birmingham on Saturday, it was difficult to avoid the feeling that the UK, and Europe, have never looked weaker in Chinese eyes.

In private, senior Chinese diplomats are now openly scornful of Britain’s economic prospects and have even asked why Mr Wen should grace such a weak trading partner with three days of his time.

Indeed, it is telling that the first stop on Mr Wen’s tour is Longbridge, the old MG Rover car factory that passed into Chinese hands in 2005. Once a byword for poor productivity, wildcat strikes and trade union power in its British Leyland and Austin Rover days, the plant is now host to China’s biggest industrial presence in the UK. Owned by Shanghai Automobile Industry Corporation, the factory designs and assembles MG cars in the UK made from car parts manufactured in China.

However, the Longbridge site remains the only major example of Sino-British co-operation, something that the Prime Minister, David Cameron, whose advisers have helped co-ordinate the visit, is determined to change.

On Mr Cameron’s visit to China last year, a target was announced for increasing bilateral UK-China trade to $100bn by 2015, from its 2010 total of $63bn and Number 10 sources said yesterday that they believe that “progress has been made” on hitting that figure.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:23:12

“Chinese premier Wen Jiabao realised that his economy needs struggling Europe to keep buying its goods. ”

Kind of hard to do when nation after nation in the Eurozone is facing high unemployment and austerity measures. Or are they expecting France and Germany to do all the heavy lifting?

 
Comment by CrackerBob
2011-06-27 06:31:47

I have a 60 year old MG made in Abingdon. I don’t think I will be buying one made in China.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 09:46:54

In private, senior Chinese diplomats are now openly scornful of Britain’s economic prospects and have even asked why Mr Wen should grace such a weak trading partner with three days of his time.

That’s all we are to them, suckers who will crap from them.

Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 11:36:39

“suckers who will crap from them.”

Could the word “buy” be missing, there?

Or, should it read “suckers who will crap for them”?

How about “former suckers who will crap on them”?

Asians in general think the dumb Amellicans are huge fun. Especially Lawrence Yun. You can tell he enjoys himself when he talks to an audience of realtors.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 12:51:55

That’s what I get blogging while on the job :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 05:08:17

Ford, GM, Chrysler Asked to Study Fuel Economy Rules of 56.2 MPG
(Bloomberg) - Jun 26, 2011

Automakers including Ford Motor Co. (F) and Toyota Motor Corp. (7203) that sell vehicles in the U.S. may have to boost car and light truck fuel economy to an average 56.2 miles per gallon by 2025 under a White House proposal presented last week.

In separate meetings with Ford, General Motors Co. (GM) and Chrysler Group LLC on June 22, the Obama administration asked the three largest U.S. automakers to analyze the effects of a 56.2 mpg fuel-economy target, two people familiar with the talks said.

That represents an improvement of about a 5 percent per year in each company’s fleetwide average fuel economy from 2016 when they are required to have a 35.5 mpg average for vehicles sold in the U.S. The Detroit News reported the administration’s plan yesterday.

Republicans including Environmental Protection Agency administrators for every Republican president since Richard Nixon joined other Republicans this week in requesting Obama to write “aggressive” fuel economy standards for 2017 to 2025, the years covered by the rule now being drafted.

Increasing fuel economy by the amount proposed could cost at least $2,100 per vehicle, according to a document prepared last year by the EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, who have said they will publish a proposed rule by Sept. 30. California’s Air Resources Board is also helping write the rule and was represented at this week’s meetings, according to the people familiar with the talks.
Rigidity of Jello

“We continue to work closely with a broad range of stakeholders to develop an important standard that will save families money and keep the jobs of the future here,” Clark Stevens, a White House spokesman, said in an e-mail. “A final decision has not been made, and as we have made clear we plan to propose that standard in September.”

Any number being floated now is early in the process, Greg Martin, a spokesman for Detroit-based GM, said in an interview.

“There’s a way go to in this process,” said Martin, who said he doesn’t know what the White House said in the meeting. “Any number out there right now has the rigidity of Jello.”

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 06:04:36

All problems will be addresssed in 2025. Relax.

You guys are going to have to buy a bunch of those expensive electric cars to keep my Chevy 454 on the road. I presume that electric motivation is considered “free” in the white house model. Ha, if GM started including bicycles in its “fleet” that would help too.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 06:27:24

Diesel tech can help in this regard too. LOts of 50 mog vehicles already for sale in Europe. But make no mistake, trukz and SUVs as commuter vehicles will have to go.

Of course, if fuel prices keep going up (and subsequent incarnations of QE will insure that) buyers will begin to demand these 50 mpg cars, once it costs $300+ to fill up the F-150.

Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 07:05:46

Or at least truckz and SUVs able to accelerate quickly and maintain high speeds while going up hills.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 08:59:58

Or at least truckz and SUVs able to accelerate quickly and maintain high speeds while going up hills.

My 4 cylinder 35 mpg car has no problems doing that.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 09:23:38

I can keep up with any truck or SUV unless it’s got the supersized 400 HP V8 under the hood.

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 11:43:22

Of course, IC. But your car weighs quite a bit less. And it is smaller, so it has to move less air out of it’s way. It requires more horsepower to accelerate those heavier vehicles, or move them up hills. Also, it requires more horsepower to push them at highway speeds because of air resistance and rolling drag.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:21:51

Wasn’t that the point?

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-06-27 14:10:23

This is where stepping hard on the gas pedal just before you climb a hill has to be taught to American drivers

———————————-
Or at least truckz and SUVs able to accelerate quickly and maintain high speeds while going up hills.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:15:01

Like I mentioned elsewhere, tradesmen in Europe seem to get by with 4 cyclinder diesel powered minivans. I rarely see a pickup doing something that only a pickup could do. I love those commercials where they load a mountain of bricks or gravel into the pickup’s bed (who does that?). Most tradesmen have a toolbox on the back and that’s it. You don’t need a 12 mpg truck for that.

It’s a manhood extender, nothing else. And a pretty lame one if you ask me, as a decent muscle car will run circles around any pickup and leave it in the dust in a straight line.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 14:21:02

The guys I know in that category pulled some big toys around on the weekends. So basically they just wanted their daily driver to also be their toy hauler.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 15:02:45

I rarely see a pickup hauling a boat or a trailer. Most pickup owners I know have neither.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 15:16:32

I’m just talking about the big 1-ton guys. The ones I know have toys. They actually hook up to them maybe 4-6 times a year?

 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-27 06:30:10

Aren’t you an mech E.? This is a good thing. We both know it.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 06:50:27

The lack of urgency or real thinking from the government just appalls me to sarcasm. We don’t need new technology to achieve huge leaps in efficiency and conservation. We only need an ounce of will.

Case in point. I have a 1985 vehicle that weighs 17,000 pounds. note: I do not commute to work in this beast. It gets 9 miles per gallon. Its HP/weight is about 1/10 that of my pickup, which has a similar engine. If the pickup was powered with a proportinally smaller engine, I’d be a little slow off the traffic light, but it would get about 50 mpg. In a little two seater, 100 mpg should be in the rear view mirror. This stuff is not rocket science!

The vehicle would be cheaper to manufacture. The drop in demand for gas would make the price fall off a cliff. So, what’s our national policy? Maintain the status quo until sometime way way out in the future. In the meantime, talk, talk, talk….and eat french fries while admonishing kids to lose weight.

The obstacle is that we want the same performance, the same size and comfort, for less. It is exactly the way we handle the national budget.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-06-27 08:22:20

What kind of vehicle do you have that weighs 17,000 lbs? A Cat dumptruck? An F350 weighs half that. You have to be off there, by some factor close to 2. An ‘85 suburban with a 454 (or something close to it) weighs 5000 lbs.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:42:48

A 1985 31 ft long Airstream, with a naked redhead aboard.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-06-27 10:17:08

Wow! Very cool. However, in the automakers’ defense, past gov’t regulations have required the 50mpg across the fleet based on sales, which means that for every 9mpg (just making up numbers here) vehicle they sell, they have to sell 3 65 mpg vehicles to meet those regulations. That could mean that specialty vehicles such as yours get cut from being manufactured.

As an example, Aston Martin is making the Smart-esque Cygnet to make up for all the sportscars it sells.

So instead of having sports car manufacturers having to make dinkmobiles they don’t want to sell, the makers should work more closely with various gov’ts to set legitimate fuel standards that still allow them to make the cars that people want.

 
Comment by polly
2011-06-27 12:18:32

Read recently that cafe standards are a remarkably poor method for increasing fuel efficiency. Gas taxes work better.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:25:47

I would love to see us use gas taxes to take the place of CAFE and goofy ideas like the 55mph speed limit from the bad old days. Let people buy what they want and drive it at the speed they want and pay the price at the pump. Anything else distorts the car market and law enforcement priorities in some really strange ways.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 12:32:50

Let people buy what they want and drive it at the speed they want and pay the price at the pump.

Only problem with letting people drive at the speed they want is that it can come to a very bad end. Case in point: The death of Ryan Dunn and his passenger in West Chester, Pennsylvania.

As mentioned before, I grew up outside of West Chester. I’m very familiar with the stretch of road where Dunn was estimated to have been going 130-140 mph. It’s posted 55 mph for a reason.

One more thing about this dual fatality accident: I feel awful for the family of the man who was riding with Dunn. He just got back from Iraq. And he was a new father. No way did he deserve to die the way he did.

I also have quite a bit of sympathy for the first responders and the agencies that dealt with the aftermath of this crash. I’d venture to guess that at least one person in this group is a friend or acquaintance of my family. I couldn’t begin to imagine what they’re going through now.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 13:12:01

Dunn was so drunk he could have crashed at any speed.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 13:30:07

I didn’t mean any speed an individual wanted…I meant the standard best practice of setting a limit at the 85th percentile speed rather than setting it for fuel conservation of revenue generation or any other dubious reason.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 13:30:46

Dunn was so drunk he could have crashed at any speed.

That’s another thing that torques my jaw.

And it’s not like you can’t call a cab in West Chester. You certainly can.

Best company I know of is called Rainbow Cab. It also has limos, which might have been more suitable for Dunn, but you have to make a reservation in advance.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 14:59:54

I used to take Rainbow Cab’s limo to the airport from Exton when I lived down there. Cost only as much as a few beers.

 
 
 
 
Comment by redrum
2011-06-27 07:01:13

“Increasing fuel economy by the amount proposed could cost at least $2,100 per vehicle, according to a document prepared last year by the EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration”

Shouldn’t these - almost by definition - be smaller, less powerful (ie. cheaper) cars?

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 09:05:06

Today’s “small cars” aren’t like small cars from 20-30 years ago.

Most “compact cars” today weigh between 2500 and 3000 lbs, in large part to be able to meet today’s safety standards. Gone is the 1900 lb hatchback of the 70’s and 80’s.

I once had a 1979 Golf/Rabbit. I was able to grab the rear fender and lift it high enough that the wheel wouldn’t touch the ground. I know I couldn’t do that with my 2009 4 banger, even though I am stronger now than I was back then.

Comment by measton
2011-06-27 10:45:15

IT’s more than that take a look at todays civic vs an accord from the 90’s. Or an aveo vs a rabbit. The newer small cars are actually much much bigger.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 10:56:18

Today’s Civic is yesterday’s Accord. The Fit is close, but still maybe a little big compared to the old Civic. You just have to go down one model to find equivalence to yesterday…except for the extra safety equipment and luxuries that increase the weight even if the size is the same.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 11:17:23

“The newer small cars are actually much much bigger.”

That too.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 11:26:45

“The Fit is close, but still maybe a little big compared to the old Civic.”

The Fit doesn’t even have all that great MPGs.

But even a Fit weighs 2489 lbs.

My wife’s MINI Cooper weighs 2535 lbs.

My Pontiac G5 weighs 2752 lbs.

Contrast this with a 1990 Nissan Maxima we once had: 3086 lbs.

Or a 1990 Ford Escort Hatchback: 2242 lbs.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:30:58

Yep, and cars like the CRX were under 2000 until the late 80s. I’m thinking the safety equipment and luxury stuff that’s now standard must be about 500lbs in that class of car.

 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:35:28

Shouldn’t these - almost by definition - be smaller, less powerful (ie. cheaper) cars?”

Not in this country. The idea is to gouge the customer, not cut them a break. The process begins with lies of increased costs for less product.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-06-27 10:29:01

If this was more of a can-do, work together country, this is what would happen.

An increase in carpooling for those who can’t walk, bike or use transit, enabled by IT. Reducing vehicle miles by one-third.

And a doubling of fuel efficiency, not by having small cars, but through technology in fuel efficient cars that can fit five Americans.

Just like this, passenger auto fuel use drops by 2/3. Shift that fuel to electric power created using domestic natural gas, and problem solved.

Whine…oh but it’s too hard and inconvenient for me! I wonder how today’s Americans would have coped with WWII rationing? There was a small minority of black market profiteers back then. More today.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:31:40

“There’s a way go to in this process,”

Yeah, it’s called “turbo diesel” and it’s been around a few decades.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-27 05:18:45

Realtors Are Liars

 
Comment by oxide
2011-06-27 05:36:01

“No man can be a good citizen unless he has a wage more than sufficient to cover the bare cost of living, and hours of labor short enough so that after his day’s work is done he will have time and energy to bear his share in the management of the community. We keep countless men from being good citizens by the conditions of life by which we surround them.”

– Theodore Roosevelt

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 05:54:24

I would add the high toll on families and society when both parents have to work to cover the essential costs of living.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 06:10:06

I personally found this very difficult as a single dad.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 06:23:00

Raising kids is a two-parent proposition. My heart goes out to those forced to go it alone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 06:32:13

Well, I found that giving birth was a two parent proposition. Raising them alone turned out to be easier. They were worth it!

 
Comment by palmetto
2011-06-27 07:24:27

Blessed are you among men.

Nothing is more valuable than a good parent.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 11:00:18

“Nothing is more valuable than a good parent.”

(Prepares bucket of chum)

You mean “the market” doesn’t raise children?

:grin:

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:32:19

Nah, it takes a village :-P.

 
Comment by mikeinbend
2011-06-27 12:47:24

Child rearing has been seen as valuable to us on a very personal level. Having had two parents at home to raise our kids during their pre-school years; I think my kids benefitted having us around. I even taught at a couple schools where my kids attended; so they could take emotional refuge in dad’s classroom for awhile. Now mom is lunch lady at the kids school; they do homework or mom gives them jobs in the lunchroom each morning. The pay is peanuts, but it beats volunteering which is what she did before she had the job in the school.

Thank you housing bubble; (and bum back, cuz I gave up a 60 hr/week job to train for a teaching career), for the ability to say I raised my own pre-school children w/my wife.

Two parent household; till they go off to school; then being involved in their schools FTW! Our kids are not angels; but public school is not failing them; They are on the honor role and we know who the bad apples to watch out for are. We see the sexualization of 6th graders that used to take place much later; but at least we know what they are talking about and are up to by being around.

And we role model by taking them hiking, advising them about being their own people in spite of peer pressure and the desire to conform; taking them camping; surfing, sporting. Its exhausting, but where else would be better energy spent? Pictures adorning the cubicle?

(Two parent stay at home households are never even mentioned by the MSM; too pie in the sky I guess). When dad gets home at 8:00 pm most days;isn’t mom effectively a single mom if she also is heavy into the workforce herself in the two earner model.

One middle school has two pregnant seventh graders; last year there were also pregnant seventh and eighth graders. My daughter is a modest prude; yay! She is not looking for an unfortunately virulent father figure which sadly many of them are. I see seventh grade girls flirting with me and it makes me queasy, uneasy, and apprehensive about the future!

Check out the graying of the churches. They used to provide community for our kids, who now, for the most part, raise themselves. Today’s Almighty is a talking head, as in TV and other media, and it does most the parenting and role modeling.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:19:54

Nah, it takes a village :-P.

I know that this phrase will endure scorn and ridicule for decades to come, but once upon a time if you misbehaved as a child even total strangers felt OK with chewing you out, and in many cases your parents thanked them.

Today they would call the cops.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 14:38:07

I know that this phrase will endure scorn and ridicule for decades to come, but once upon a time if you misbehaved as a child even total strangers felt OK with chewing you out, and in many cases your parents thanked them.

I grew up in an environment like that.

 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-06-27 10:30:10

“No man can be a good citizen unless he has a…hours of labor short enough so that after his day’s work is done he will have time and energy to bear his share in the management of the community.”

Or watch hours of cable TV.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:42:15

Theodore Roosevelt was one of a kind.

He would be called a tree-huggin’ socialeest/commie by today’s standards. Yet he was one the most hard’assed law enforcers and advocates for REAL justice this country has ever seen.

Check out his bio on Wiki for the highlights.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 16:52:46

Roosevelt used to take people on hikes through the forests of DC. Yup, the place does have forests.

ISTR reading that one of his favorite hiking haunts was Rock Creek Park, which has lots of steep hills. He especially enjoyed a good bushwack going right up a steep hill.

And if the President of the United States led you up a tough slope, well, you followed right along.

Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 17:54:17

A piker, distance wise, compared to supreme court justic William O Douglas, who once lead an 8 day long hike of the length of the C&O canal. http://www.nps.gov/choh/forkids/justicedouglasonemancanmakeadifference.htm

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 05:39:58

Fed will continue pumping gambling money to its Primary Dealers even after QE II officially ends.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-27/fed-seen-buying-25-billion-a-month-in-treasuries-after-qe2-comes-to-end.html

The Federal Reserve will remain the biggest buyer of Treasuries, even after the second round of quantitative easing ends this week, as the central bank uses its $2.86 trillion balance sheet to keep interest rates low.

While the $600 billion purchase program, known as QE2, winds down, the Fed said June 22 that it will continue to buy Treasuries with proceeds from the maturing debt it currently owns. That could mean purchases of as much as $300 billion of government debt over the next 12 months without adding money to the financial system.

The central bank, which injected $2.3 trillion into the financial system after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September 2008, will continue buying Treasuries to keep market rates down as the economy slows. The purchases are supporting demand at bond auctions while President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress struggle to close the gap between federal spending and income by between $2 trillion and $4 trillion.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 05:51:16

The little people don’t need to know what their betters are making. It would only ‘confuse’ them.

Companies lobby to hide disparity in CEO, worker pay
By Peter Whoriskey
The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — One financial figure some big U.S. companies would rather keep secret is how much more their CEO makes than their typical worker.

A group backed by 81 major companies — including McDonald’s, Lowe’s, General Dynamics, American Airlines, IBM and General Mills — is lobbying against new rules that would force disclosure of this comparison.

A House committee Wednesday approved a bill that would repeal the disclosure requirement.

Disclosing such comparisons “can mislead or confuse investors,” said Rep. Nan Hayworth, R-N.Y., who filed the bill to repeal it and who counted three financial firms among her top donors. “It creates heat but sheds no light.”

The vote was largely along partisan lines: Republicans supported repeal, angering Democrats.

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 06:22:08

“… new rules that would force disclosure of this comparison.”

The is an abundant supply of information out there in cyberville in case anyone wants to take a look.

For example, there are full disclosure documents corporations have to file with the SCC. and they are but a few keyboard clicks away.

Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 06:26:22

SCC = SEC

 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 10:47:41

A little harder to find out what the average worker at the company makes.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 12:50:49

If it’s so readily available, why are they lobbying so hard to block its dissemination?

Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 13:39:49

’cause of stuff like this:

Johnson’s plastics company paid him $10 million in deferred compensation shortly before he was sworn in as Wisconsin’s junior senator, according to his latest financial disclosure report.

The first-term Republican declined to say how his Oshkosh firm, Pacur, came up with a figure that so closely mirrored the amount he personally put into his campaign fund.

“You take a look in terms of what would be a reasonable compensation package, OK?” Johnson said this week. “It’s a private business. I’ve complied with all the disclosure laws, and I don’t have to explain it any further to someone like you.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 19:48:31

Are you talking about blocking information from a public company or a private one?

If you are talking about a private one then, yeah, information is hard to come by. But if you are talking about a public one then it isn’t.

 
Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 20:15:57

Just for the heck of it I just now chose a stock at random - IBM - to see how easy it is to get information about this stock off the net.

In about one minute-or-so I learned that IBM filed Schedule 14A with the SEC on March 7, 2000.

I then accessed this Schedule 14A and learned the total compensation - in detail - that was paid out to all the officers and directors of IBM.

I doubt if even five minutes had passed from start to finish.

 
Comment by combotechie
2011-06-27 20:17:39

“March 7, 2000″ should be “March 7, 2011″.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-28 04:50:04

Then why are they lobbying so hard to block it, combo?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 06:30:11

Truth “can mislead or confuse investors”

If I were an investor, I’d be interested in the ratio of CEO compensation to stock dividend. I know, it would confuse me, but I’d like to see it anyway. As for the FedGov, they should not be in the pillory business.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:48:49

Bookmark this:

www2.gmiratings.com

The Independent Global Leader in Corporate Governance and ESG

Formerly “The Corporate Library”, the best source of independent news on corporations, CEO and BOD compensation, policies and governance.

This the gold standard for this kind of information.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-27 05:51:58

Hey Housing Crime Syndicate goons……. if you can’t find a smidgen of honesty, why don’t you sign in right here on this post and tell us how sales are.

Thanks,

~Realtors Are Liars

 
Comment by Al
2011-06-27 07:19:10

Yesterday I was watching CTV Newsnet. It’s a Canadian 24 hour news channel, and it has the scrolling headlines across the bottom of the screen. One of those scrolling headlines caught my eye, it approximately said:

“Government debt is one of the oldest and most successful forms of investments in human history. Now it’s becoming more popular with household investors.”

It struck me as odd. There was no actual story related to that headline (though that’s not uncommon.) The only current event it could be tied to is the upcoming defaults in Europe, but then that wouldn’t be the right headline. Are they trying to get the Canadian public to run out and lighten the banks’ load of soon-to-be bad government debt? Has anyone else seen anything else like this?

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 08:13:03

Yes. Canadian household debt surpasses US. Canada is #1!

Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 10:16:35

You’ll get the bacon later, I promise.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 12:28:34

I don’t care what they call it, that’s not bacon.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 14:51:06

That’s what they say about American Cheese.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-28 04:52:58

“That’s what they say about American Cheese.”

Well, they would, wouldn’t they? They’re all commies.

At least we haven’t banned unpasteurized cheese, eh!?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by In Raleigh
2011-06-27 08:08:06

Does anyone here have any experience buying foreclosed houses through HUD? I know you need to used an agent to bid on them. There are two that we’re interested in. Is there a way to get the utilities turned back on for an inspection? Also, are the prices they are listed at real prices? Or are they really just the starting bid?

Comment by Kim
2011-06-27 10:11:46

“Is there a way to get the utilities turned back on for an inspection?”

It is my understanding that it can be done, but the potential buyer foots the bill for it.

Comment by Max Power
2011-06-27 13:22:45

True. Call the utility company to find out exactly how it works. In Phoenix, they have a program set up for exactly these kinds of situations. They apply to all kinds of foreclosures or vacant short sales.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-06-27 08:17:38

Time to blow the whistle on the banks
Mark Crosby
June 28, 2011

‘Should we remain hostage to the possibility that financial institutions in western Europe might drown in the foolishness of their Greek loans?’

‘Should we remain hostage to the possibility that financial institutions in western Europe might drown in the foolishness of their Greek loans?’ Photo: Reuters

Financial failures have their place, writes Mark Crosby.

WILL Greece default and lead us to global financial crisis II, as many alarmists seem to be predicting? Well, if it does, bring it on. The first global financial crisis is unfinished business, and needs to be finished before economies in Europe and the US properly recover. Supposedly the great risk facing financial markets is that a default in Greece will bring down banks across Europe and potentially elsewhere, leading to the sort of chaos that we observed after the failure of Lehman Brothers in 2008.

What we learned from Lehman Brothers’ collapse was that financial markets are interconnected. We learned that in many countries, financial institutions were undercapitalised and lacked liquidity. Financial institutions also held toxic assets. What we seem not to have learned from the GFC is that financial institutions sometimes need to fail.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/time-to-blow-the-whistle-on-the-banks-20110627-1gnfh.html#ixzz1QUR4pm83

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 10:35:19

So…What ever happened to the Daimlers? http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=2844

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:11:36

WTH? You consumers need to get out there and consume…

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans spent in May at the weakest pace in 20 months. . .the worst result since September 2009. And when adjusted for inflation, spending actually dropped 0.1 percent. Incomes rose 0.3 percent for the second straight month. But adjusted for inflation, after-tax incomes increased only 0.1 percent in May, after falling by the same amount in the previous month

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:27:49

If they want us to spend then they need to pay us more. It ain’t gonna happen though.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:54:02

Can’t spend what we don’t have and can’t borrow.

How’s them low wages working for you, Corporate America? I wouldn’t put too much faith in the Chinese market if I were you. They like to “roll their own” after they steal your IP.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:14:00

Elderly woman asked to remove adult diaper during TSA search
Florida Freedom Newspapers

A woman has filed a complaint with federal authorities over how her elderly mother was treated at Northwest Florida Regional Airport last weekend.

Jean Weber of Destin filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security after her 95-year-old mother was detained and extensively searched last Saturday while trying to board a plane to fly to Michigan to be with family members during the final stages of her battle with leukemia.

Her mother, who was in a wheelchair, was asked to remove an adult diaper in order to complete a pat-down search.

“It’s something I couldn’t imagine happening on American soil,” Weber said Friday. “Here is my mother, 95 years old, 105 pounds, barely able to stand, and then this.”

Sari Koshetz, a spokeswoman for the Transportation Security Administration in Miami, said she could not comment on specific cases to protect the privacy of those involved.

“The TSA works with passengers to resolve any security alarms in a respectful and sensitive manner,” she said.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:55:13

They are, of course, denying it today.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:15:35

In passing: Marc Faber, the often quoted financier: “The debt level, especially in the US, if we include the unfunded liabilities of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and these entitlement programs, is beyond repair. And this will necessitate printing more money. Also, in my view, there is no real political will to address the issues, because who ever would cut entitlements, will not be re-elected. So we have a tyranny of the masses.”

← “Tyranny of the masses.” Good way to put it. The majority of voters want more money from the public treasury, not less. Therefore, political candidates cannot promise to operate the federal government within the limits of its income. That isn’t possible without imposing austere measures in the popular entitlement programs.

This the voters would never approve.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-06-27 12:54:19

““The debt level, especially in the US, if we include the unfunded liabilities of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and these entitlement programs, is beyond repair. And this will necessitate printing more money. ”

It will also necessitate the implementation of a single-payer universal health coverage plan.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 13:31:50

It will also necessitate the implementation of a single-payer universal health coverage plan.

I sure hope so!

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:18:52

“Buy American act” surely they are kidding…

Home Depot Accused Of Violating “Buy American” Law
By Henry Blodget | Daily Ticker –

In 1933, in an effort to protect American jobs, the US enacted something called the “Buy American” Act.

The law mandates that public buildings be built using only materials that have originated from the US and a few favored countries, like Canada and Israel. Home Depot has now become the latest American company accused of violating it.

In theory, rules that require the American government to only buy products and services from American companies sometimes sound like they make sense, especially with the US unemployment rate above 9%: Why should the government spend American tax dollars to help foreign companies compete against US companies?

In practice, however, the global economy has become so intertwined that it is extremely difficult to define what constitutes an “American” product.

Is a Toyota that was built by American workers in a domestic plant in Tennessee an “American car”? If not, why is that Toyota really less of American car than a General Motors car built primarily of parts imported from China? And what if the GM car was built in Europe by European workers and then imported to the US–would that be an American car?

Beyond the challenge of defining what is and isn’t an American product, there is the reality that American-made products do not always provide the best value for the money relative to imported products. And in an era defined by massive government budget deficits, shouldn’t government spending get the most possible value for American taxpayers?

In any event, The Department of Justice is now investigating Home Depot for possibly violating the Buy American Act. In the last six, several other companies have faced similar investigations, including Office Depot, Fastenal, Staples, OfficeMax, and W.W. Grainger. All of the companies have settled by paying fines, which have totaled about $30 million.

Comment by Jim A
2011-06-27 12:41:25

I thought that Home Depot had a corporate policy of NOT being a government contractor because they didn’t want to deal with these sorts of contracting regulations. And they enforced it to such a strong degree that they wouldn’t accept government issued charge-cards.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:57:15

All of the companies have settled by paying fines, which have totaled about $30 million.

…and then continued just as they were.

 
 
Comment by measton
2011-06-27 11:22:36

BIG SKY, Montana (Reuters) – Lawmakers should change the tax code to discourage household and business borrowing that threatens the stability of the financial system, a top Federal Reserve official said on Monday.

“You are all very aware that our country has gone through a difficult financial crisis and that we are still only beginning to make our way back from its impact,” Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota told the Tri-State Bankers Summit in Big Sky, Montana.

The current tax code allows households to deduct interest payments on home mortgages and corporations to deduct interest payments on debt.

Policymakers could make new crises less likely to occur if they limit such deductions, which subsidize the kind of excessive borrowing that helped trigger the recent financial crisis, Kocherlakota said.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:23:20

Nice to see the DOW heading north, what with all the good monetary info. flooding in.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 16:59:00

It’s GOOD to be the Banksta!

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-06-27 11:25:08

Christie: The unions stuck it to Malloy
June 27, 2011 at 12:29 pm
by Tom Cleary

Just a few days after Malloy saw his concessions deal with the union fall apart, his rival appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Christie laughed as one of the show’s host Joe Scarborough mentioned Malloy’s name, and then took him to task for lecturing and preaching about how his concessions deal was the proper way to deal with a budget crisis and then leaving the people of Connecticut hanging when the deal fell through.

“Dan Malloy was lecturing me about how he can get it done, he’s conciliatory he negotiates with people. He got these big concessions in return for big tax increases,” Christie said. “So now what do the people of Connecticut have? Big tax increases with no concessions because the union stuck it to him.”

“He went around and trumpeted the 1.6 billion in concessions that he got and they voted it down. So now the people of Connecticut have the tax increases without the labor concessions,” said Christie. “And now what he is going to have to do is lay off up to 7,500 people. I’d say that’s going to make him even more popular in Connecticut.”

http://www.greenwichtime.com/ - 136k -

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:00:29

As well they should have. Raise taxes and cut wages?

I don’t think SO.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:25:41

International Judges Order Arrest of Muammar Qaddafi
June 27, 2011| Associated Press

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – International judges ordered the arrest Monday of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi for murdering civilians, as NATO warplanes pounded his Tripoli compound and world leaders stepped up calls for him to end his four-decade rule.

The International Criminal Court said Qaddafi, his son Seif al-Islam and his intelligence chief Abdullah al-Sanoussi are wanted for orchestrating the killing, injuring, arrest and imprisonment of hundreds of civilians during the first 12 days of an uprising to topple Qaddafi from power, and for trying to cover up the alleged crimes.

The warrants turn the three men into internationally wanted suspects, potentially complicating efforts to mediate an end to more than four months of intense fighting in the North African nation.

The warrants will be sent to Libya, where Qaddafi remained defiantly entrenched. But when the U.N. Security Council ordered the court to investigate the bloodshed in Libya, it also urged all nations and regional organizations to cooperate with the court.

Presiding judge Sanji Monageng of Botswana called Qaddafi the “undisputed leader of Libya” who had “absolute, ultimate and unquestioned control” over his country’s military and security forces. She said there were “reasonable grounds to believe” that Qaddafi and his son are both responsible for the murder and persecution of civilians.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 11:46:25

Well, this tells us one thing - his continued existence is useful to someone in high places - otherwise he’d be finished by now.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 13:54:25

When NATO kills civilians it is to save them from Qaddafi.

Comment by drumminj
2011-06-27 14:43:32

When NATO kills civilians it is to save them from Qaddafi.

yeah, that stood out to me. Seems any charges against Qaddafi could easily be levied against the US.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:02:51

Qaddafi doesn’t have 13 nuclear aircraft carrier task groups, hundreds of nuclear bombers nor thousands of ICBMs, so he gets punked.

And THAT’S how THAT works.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:29:29

From down under…

Average household food bill nears $200 as food inflation tipped to surge as high as 5pc From: The Daily Telegraph

The average household food bill is nearing $200 amid warnings of soaring inflation. Picture: File

FAMILIES already hurting from the rising cost of living are facing yet another cruel blow to their budgets - the price of food is set to soar.

Analysts believe food inflation will surge as high as 5 per cent in the coming quarter and continue to rise over 18 months, pushing the average household’s weekly food spend dangerously close to the $200 mark.

With electricity prices set to rise 17 per cent in the next 12 months, further compounded by increases to gas, water, rates and taxes, the surge in food prices is merely the latest in a long line of rising costs helping to erode the savings of Australian families.

Retailers, burdened with excessive input costs - including electricity, labour and commodities, both overseas and domestically - have been left with no choice but to pass on costs to the consumer.

According to Citigroup’s June equities report, the input costs for food and liquor in the three months to May rose 25.2 per cent on the previous corresponding period, driven by soft commodities such as coffee, wheat, canola, sugar and oil and partially offset by a stronger Australian dollar.

It said supermarket inflation had started to accelerate, with predictions of more than 4 per cent by September.

Australian Food and Grocery Council chief executive Kate Carnell said inflation was more around the vicinity of 5 per cent and that prices for commodities like sugar and wheat, both fundamental for many food products, had increased 20 to 30 per cent in the last few years.

The grim forecast comes as the Daily Telegraph today reveals the average consumer is paying $1300 a year more than two years ago for exactly the same basket of groceries.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 14:55:29

Weren’t rising commodity prices supposed to be good for the Australians?

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-06-27 11:37:26

Comment by Kim
2011-06-26 15:21:01

“Good article. This is worth the read, HBBers.”

Illinois Stiffs Vendors From Mortuary to IBM as $4 Billion Debt Piles Up

By Tim Jones and Melissa Silverberg
June 24, 2011 12:01 AM ET

Illinois, which borrowed to make its two most recent annual pension payments, is tied with California as the lowest-rated state in the estimation of Moody’s Investors Service, at A1.

In January, lawmakers approved increases of 67 percent in the state income tax and a 46 percent in the corporate income tax. Those, however, weren’t sufficient to cover the backlog, and the bills will be passed onto the fiscal year that begins July 1.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-24/illinois-stiffs-vendors-from-mortuary-to-ibm-as-4-billion-debt-piles-up.html - 73k -

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-06-27 11:51:10

Springfield is already whispering that the hike in the corporate tax rate might be lessened. This is after several high profile companies - most notably the Chicago Mercantile Exchange - openly threatened to move. Of course there is no parallel effort to roll back the increase in personal income tax.

No matter, the article is exactly right, the problems in IL are so dire that they have already swallowed the increased revenue from those tax hikes.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:51:27

Well since states can not print their way to prosperity, they’ll have to TAX their way there! Should be very popular with voters.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:41:38

There WILL be blood prosperity.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-06-27 13:35:17

Fron the article above about Connecticut.

“He went around and trumpeted the 1.6 billion in concessions that he got and they voted it down. So now the people of Connecticut have the tax increases without the labor concessions,” said Christie. “And now what he is going to have to do is lay off up to 7,500 people. I’d say that’s going to make him even more popular in Connecticut.”

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:05:51

I’ve learned the hard way to NEVER go beyond net’30 with customers.

Never. They want to drop you? Fine. It just means they were going to screw you anyway.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:39:36

“The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent vice of Socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”

~Winston Churchill

Comment by chilidoggg
2011-06-28 04:49:00

That was pithy 70 years ago. It seems Japan, Germany, Scandinavia, and to a lesser degree Italy and Holland have somewhat “refudiated” Churchill’s assessment.

The genius of Gallipoli. And the Burmese Famine.

In response to an urgent request by the Secretary of State for India, Leo Amery, and Viceroy of India Achibald Wavell, to release food stocks for India, Winston Churchill the Prime Minister of that time responded with a telegram to Wavell asking, if food was so scarce, “why Gandhi hadn’t died yet.”

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 11:49:17

Appears this summer may be a rough one…Some more “misguided youth”

Woman’s leg broken, others hurt in Spring Garden mob attack
Philadelphia Daily News

A WOMAN’S leg was broken and several other people were injured Saturday night when a large group of teens accosted pedestrians in Spring Garden, police and witnesses said.

Philadelphia police responded to two reports of pedestrians being assaulted by a large group of young people along Broad Street about 9:30 p.m.

One of those reports came from Emily Guendelsberger, 27, city editor for local arts and entertainment content for the Onion, the satirical newspaper and website. She was walking with seven friends on Green Street near Broad when they were accosted, she said. Guendelsberger, who remained hospitalized with a broken leg yesterday, declined to comment further.

A friend who was with her at the time, Daily News staff writer Molly Eichel, said that they were walking down Green Street when a group of teens was walking down Broad. “We heard kids yell, ‘Run, run,’ ” Eichel said. “Some kid just came out of nowhere and punched my friend Charlie in the face.”

Eichel said that when her group tried to run, about 20 teens chased them down the street. “They were kicking kids down and punching them when they were down,” she said.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 12:05:50

One of these days, these “misguided youth” are going to pick the wrong crowd to mess with. As in, a mild-mannered looking group that may actually have just gotten out of the military. Or a group of friends who share an interest in the martial arts. Or something like that.

And look for those “misguided youth” to get their butts kicked bigtime. I can see this sort of thing happening in Philly. People there don’t put up with shhhhhhhhhh-t forever.

Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:21:01

Yep, hopefully sooner than later. I know several people in Philly, they all carry guns.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:44:23

Who was that (in?)famous nerdy guy in NYC back in the 80s that went to trial for shooting a misguided youth with a screwdriver on the subway? Bernie something…? I expect to see a similar incident sometime fairly soon if the reports aren’t exaggerated.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 13:34:05

That was Bernhard Goetz.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 13:48:34

Yes I do remember that, but can not think of his name.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-06-27 14:07:15

Goetz was eventually charged with attempted murder, assault, reckless endangerment, and several firearms offenses. A jury found him not guilty of all charges except an illegal firearms possession count, for which he served two-thirds of a one-year sentence

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:10:27

I have a friend who’s a mechanic, black fellow I’ve known for years, he’s in his 50’s. We talk about every damn thing except sports. He comes from a very large hard working family. This morning he says to me, you know David something is very wrong with this country, I can feel it. It’s been going on for years. Politicians are liars and just make matters worse, it doesn’t matter who you vote for, they are in it for themselves, plain and simple. He went on to say that he does not think that “things” will ever come back to the way they were prior to the recession. Because things got out of hand, peoples eyes were bigger than their stomachs, they want it all and want right now. I’ll work until the day I die, got to feed my family.

Dave has no savings works pay check to pay check, earns every bit of it and rarely complains. There are a whole lot of people out there in the same boat as Dave. They know something is not right and know they can’t do anything about it, so they are frustrated and rightfully so.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:58:12

Wait until the snakes come to take their social security away.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:07:54

Where have they been for the last 30 years? :roll:

 
Comment by rms
2011-06-27 17:45:21

“This morning he says to me, you know David something is very wrong with this country, I can feel it.”

Sounds like he was recently in line at the grocery store waiting behind a young obese tattooed young woman in flip flops playing with her iPhone who paid with a social food card.

“Dave, stop. Stop, will you? Stop, Dave. Will you stop, Dave? Stop, Dave. I’m afraid. I’m afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it.” -HAL9000

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:19:28

Former Citi VP Charged With Embezzling $19M
Published June 27, 2011 | FOXBusiness

A former vice-president at Citigroup was arrested and charged with skimming $19 million from the bank and diverting into his personal account.

Gary Foster, 35, was a vice-president in Citigroup’s treasury finance department, according to a statement released by federal prosecutors in New York. He was arrested Sunday in New York after arriving on a flight from Bangkok.

Foster, who’s been charged with bank fraud, was scheduled to appear in court on Monday.

According to the federal complaint filed against him, Foster transferred money from various Citigroup accounts to Citigroup’s cash account and then to his personal account at a different bank.

Between July 2010 and December 2010, he allegedly moved about $900,000 from Citigroup’s interest expense account and about $14.4 million from Citigroup’s debt adjustment account to the bank’s cash account. Later he wired the money out of Citigroup’s cash account to his personal account at another bank in eight separate wire transfers, the complaint alleges.

Prosecutors say Foster attempted to cover his tracks by creating a phony contract or deal number that was used in the wire transfer to create the appearance that the transfer was tied to an actual contract.

“The defendant allegedly used his knowledge of bank operations to commit the ultimate inside job,” U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch said in a statement.

Citigroup said in a statement: “We are outraged by the actions of this former employee. Citi informed law enforcement immediately upon discovery of the suspicious transactions and we are cooperating fully to ensure Mr. Foster is prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 12:27:37

Aha! Evidence of control fraud finally rears its ugly head.

And what is control fraud? It’s gaining control of a company for the purpose of looting it. A recent example would be Enron. Going back a bit further in U.S. history, there was quite a bit of control fraud in the savings and loans that bit the dust in the 1980s.

Now, I wouldn’t be your HBB Librarian without leaving you with a book recommendation. For learning more about control fraud, I recommend William K. Black’s book, The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:38:25

Couch money, I’ll get excited when “they” go after the real thieves. Never happen, I know.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 12:46:27

I’ve never understood how you make vice-president at a company that big by 35.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 12:51:23

Read the book Snakes in Suits. It’s about psychopaths in the workplace. It could also be read as a how-to manual for rising to the top of dysfunctional organizations.

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-06-27 12:56:21

I think half the people working at banks are vice presidents of some sort.

Comment by NYchk
2011-06-28 05:20:09

“I think half the people working at banks are vice presidents of some sort.”

That’s true. “VP” is a common title a banks for lower to middle management.

Fancy titles are common at banks. AVP, VP, Director or Executive Director, doesn’t mean squat if you’re not getting paid.

Especially at Citibank, Citi is known to give out titles like candy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 12:59:11

From what I have seen its the new normal. The image of the VP in his 50’s and the CEO in his 60’s is an anachronism from the Eisenhower administration. Now they are in their 30’s (VPs) and 40’s (CEOs).

Its all about being on the management fast track and having a “mentor” who will help you move ahead quickly. I recall young (early 30’s) middle managers at HP fretting that they had been left in the dust, their hopes of moving into upper management dashed when their trek to the top of the pyramid stalled. And the reason for their despair was of course knowing that they would never make (as a coworker called it) the “crazy money” that upper management would get. They also knew that their lack of advancement meant that someday they too would be laid off to make room for the next generation of up and rising management stars.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 13:34:40

Its all about being on the management fast track and having a “mentor” who will help you move ahead quickly.

As a redneck military veteran with a BSEE and an MBA I either never got close enough to the fast track to positively identify it, or else was too ignorant to identify it even when it was in plain sight. All I know for sure is that nobody ever came up to me and told me to hop on.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-27 14:03:31

The fast trackers are pretty easy to identify.

Their noses are brown. Sometimes their whole heads.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:05:09

From what I have heard its indispensible to have someone take you under their wing and groom you for moving up into the rarified atmosphere of upper management. IIRC Carly Fiorina was groomed that way when she worked at Lucent (pre HP) and she eventually married her mentor.

From what I understand you need that mentor to gain access to the “club” at which point cronyism is your friend and you will be able to hop around with your CEO as s/he moves from company to company. One thing that really stood out with Mark Hurd at HP was how he shoved career a lot of HP execs out the door (these were people who worked their entire careers at HP) and replaced them with his cronies.

“All I know for sure is that nobody ever came up to me and told me to hop on.”

Few are called. My brother (also an MBA) used to work at Sarah Lee as a mid level manager and he saw first hand how upper management brought in their proteges and how quickly they climbed the ladder. Like you, he and the rest of the middle management team were not invited to the party.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-06-27 14:33:19

So where was the party invitation originally obtained? Ivy League contacts? From the right part of the right town and your parents knew their parents? Just trying to figure out how the country really works…

I just know that with my personality even if I’d gone to the right Ivy League school I wouldn’t have made the right contacts, therefore making all the extra costs of going there pointless.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 14:41:12

I just know that with my personality even if I’d gone to the right Ivy League school I wouldn’t have made the right contacts, therefore making all the extra costs of going there pointless.

I’m with ya, Carl.

I’m one of those people who’s downright awful in formal networking situations like prestige schools, clubs, etc. I just never took to those situations.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:55:59

My brother said that the guy had an Ivy League degree and that at a personality level he was very polished. Beyond that he didn’t know.

My brother later worked for a tire company and for a brief instance an upper manager was talking about moving him to HQ. In the end it didn’t happen and my brother eventually moved on.

 
Comment by RedmondJP
2011-06-27 16:01:22

At one company where I used to work, certain individuals were selected by mgmt. to “volunteer” in leadership development seminars (aka management training). If you chose not to participate, you could pretty much kiss your chances of moving up into the hallowed ranks goodbye.

Then, once you had passed this test, your loyalty to the corporation was then further tested by job assignments at locations across the country/world.

I’m guessing that they picked people based upon their work ethic, and their willingness to be “yes” men. Troublemakers (those who dare question authority) such as myself didn’t stand a chance.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 16:20:19

I was fast tracked at a very recognizable huge company some decades ago. Jumped to upper management in just a few years. I failed an immorality test with flying colors and was dropped from the program like a hot rock. A case of mistaken identity. I concluded that you were either all in or all out. I suspect the last big company that an “honest job”, as they called it, got you ahead was Bell Telephone (before the breakup). This fast track thing would kill the average person in short order. It’s no wonder they are all young.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:09:20

Schadenfreude meter PEGGED!!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:28:57

Twice as fast as Concorde: The supersonic jet that will fly from London to New York in TWO HOURS By Daily Mail Reporter

It has been eight years since Concorde was retired from service, and with it the supersonic dreams of millions around the world.

Now supersonic travel is on the cards again after a manufacturer unveiled plans for a plane that will travel twice the speed of Concorde.

HyperMach claims its SonicStar aircraft will be so quick that travelling from London to New York will take just two hours.
Return of supersonic travel: The SonicStar aircraft will be twice as fast as Concorde - so quick that travelling from London to New York will take just two hours. It was unveiled at the Paris Air Show

Return of supersonic travel: The SonicStar aircraft will be twice as fast as Concorde - so quick that travelling from London to New York will take just two hours. It was unveiled at the Paris Air Show
SONICSTAR’S SPECS

Maximum cruise speed - Mach 3.6
Long-range cruise speed - Mach 3.1
High-speed cruise speed - Mach 3.4
Engines - Two SonicBlue S-MAGJET Hybrid Supersonic 4000-X Series
Thrust - Flat-rated to 54,700lb
Wing area - 1,800 square feet
Landing distance - 4,800ft
Range - 6,000 nautical miles
Highest Altitude - 62,000ft

CABIN

Length - 64metres
Height at maximum - 2.6metres
Width at maximum - 2.7metres

A trip from New York to Sydney, meanwhile, will be cut by a staggering 75 per cent - from 20 hours on a commercial airliner to just five hours.

British firm HyperMach revealed its plans for the 20-seat plane at the Paris Air Show last week.

It will be able to cruise at Mach 3.1, a speed made possible by S-MAGJET hybrid gas turbine engine technology; nobody has ever travelled that fast before.

Its top speed, however, will be Mach 3.6.

Richard Lugg, the chief executive of HyperMach, said: ‘Mankind has always been inspired to do things better, quicker and faster and that is our ambition.’

HyperMach plans to build its engine by the end of the decade and to have the plane itself constructed by 2025.

With relatively low fuel consumption, the Sonic Star ‘overcomes the economic and environmental challenges of supersonic flight to revolutionise the way we travel and drive air transportation forward into the future,’ claims HyperMach.

By using electromagnetic currents across the fuselage to suppress the sonic boom, the plane is able to overcome the noise regulations that constrict supersonic travel.

It has a range of 6,000 nautical miles and its 54,700 thrust class S-MAGJET engine - actually two engines - is optimised to fly the aircraft at 62,000ft.

But it is the reduction in jet engine emissions that HyperMach believes will prove the secret of SonicStar’s success.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 13:55:05

Sounds cool, well see if it ever actually happens.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-06-27 14:00:12

About every three years, a bunch of guys nobody has ever heard of show up at Paris or the NBAA convention with the latest/greatest SSBJ concept…….usually they have a pretty nice model on display.

And they all disappear after a couple of years.

Notice they don’t give any weights (MTOW, Empty weight, etc). Weight is critical. Would be nice to see their weight estimates to see if they are being realistic, or dreaming.

A 4800 ft takeoff roll is total BS.

Does that New York-Sydney estimate include the fuel stop? 6000 NM range only gets you 2/3 of the way there. Nobody has ever had a Mach 3.6 airplane that needed a “quick turn” before, how long does it have to sit on the ground cooling off before they can hook up the single-point?

The thing had better get fuel economy close to what a G-5 or Global Express gets. Everybody is already bitching in the corporate world about paying 7-8 bucks a gallon for fuel.

My advice…….believe it when you see it. And you are more likely to see it coming from Gulfstream, Dassault/Falcon, Sukhoi, or Lockheed, or a partnership of one/all of the above. Maybe in 2025.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 14:43:35

Thanks for such a crystal-clear explanation, X-GSfixr.

And that’s one of the things I love about this blog. One person posts a news story and then someone else with in-depth knowledge posts a response. Which demolishes the hype in the original story.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:13:26

Thanks X-GSfixr. You just saved me from a lot of typing on why this is just pie-in-the-sky marketing.

Remember the bullcrap surrounding the first attempts at supersonic passenger service?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 19:54:28

Relax. We’ll have it figured out by 2025.

Just which airport in NYC with a 1 mile runway we will use is still “up in the air”.

Electronic fuzzies on the body to eliminate the sonic boom. lol.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:43:00

Debt Hamstrings Recovery
Inability of Nations, Consumers to Get Out of Hock Weighs on Global Economy. WSJ

The Federal Reserve is just days away from ending one of the major steps to aid the U.S. economy—but the effort has done little to solve the original problem: The government and individuals alike are still heavily in debt.

Around the globe, the inability of governments and households to reduce their debt continues to cast a shadow over Western economies and the financial health of individuals. Today, U.S. consumers have more mortgage and credit-card debt than they did five years ago, and the U.S. budget deficit is worsening. At the same time, European governments are having to throw billions more …

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:14:56

You have to wonder…. will the Bankstas put us all in jail when we can’t pay?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 12:47:53

Hold it, I thought it was different in limey land…

Business Digest: No one’s moving, no one’s buying… Habitat is just the first to go. JUNE 27, 2011 - Read a full report at the Sunday Times

Retail experts say that so many shops could close this summer that some British shopping streets and malls could be left virtually empty. The miserable forecast follows the collapse of the homeware chain Habitat and that of Homeform, owners of Dolphin Bathrooms and Moben Kitchens.

Other high street names on the verge include fashion chain Jane Norman, which will go into administration unless a buyer is found within days, and Clinton Cards, where a radical restructuring is expected to lead to many of its 700 outlets closing, or worse. Kesa, the French owner of Comet, is weighing up “strategic alternatives”.

The retailers are in trouble because of the shift of many consumers to internet shopping and the big drop in people moving home and wanting to refurnish. But there’s also the general slump in consumer confidence and the fact that some chains over-expanded during the boom and took on too much debt.

Nick Moser, head of insolvency at the international law firm Taylor Wessing, said: “I would be amazed if others were not on the brink of insolvency.”

Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:17:12

Just what they need. Already extremely high unemployment and some currently very upset students and unions.

Oh dear.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 13:22:10

Iran to stage missile wargames from Monday

TEHRAN (AFP) – Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards are to launch military exercises on Monday with the firing of different range ballistic missiles, the state news agency IRNA reported.

The exercises, codenamed Great Prophet-6, are to start on Monday, said a Guards commander, General Ami Ali Hadjizadeh, quoted by IRNA, without specifying how long the manoeuvres will last.

“Short-, medium- and long-range missiles will be fired, especially the Khalij-Fars, Sejil, Fateh, Ghiam, and Shahab-1 and -2 missiles,” he said.

The general, whose force carries out war-games each year in the Gulf region, said the latest exercises were “a message of peace and friendship to the countries of the area.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 13:28:25

Soros Says a Euro Exit Mechanism Is ‘Probably Inevitable’ Amid Debt Crisis June 27 (Bloomberg)

Billionaire investor George Soros said it’s “probably inevitable” that a mechanism will be put in place to allow weaker economies to exit the euro.

“There’s no arrangement for any countries leaving the euro, which in current circumstances is probably inevitable,” Soros, 80, said at a panel discussion in Vienna yesterday on whether liberal democracy is at risk in Europe. “We are on the verge of an economic collapse which starts, let’s say, in Greece, but it could easily spread. The financial system remains extremely vulnerable.”

Concern Greek lawmakers will fail to pass austerity measures to ensure the next installment of the nation’s bailout is roiling global markets and pushed the euro to a record-low against the Swiss franc last week. Greece is one of three euro- region members to have sought international bailouts amid the sovereign debt crisis.

“I think most of us actually agree that” Europe’s crisis “is actually centered around the euro,” said Soros. “It’s a kind of financial crisis that is really developing. It’s foreseen. Most people realize it. It’s still developing. The authorities are actually engaged in buying time. And yet time is working against them,” he said.

The euro was created in 1999, with 11 member states — Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, Austria, Portugal, Spain and Ireland. Greece was the 12th country to adopt the shared currency in 2001, while Estonia is the newest member of the euro region, joining this January.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:51:15

He’s 80? I guess the super rich are different.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 13:34:07

Doctors Turn Away Insured on Low Payments
By Drew Armstrong - Jun 27, 2011 (Bloomberg)

U.S. doctors are turning away an increasing number of patients, including those with private insurance, according to a study in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Physicians were willing to accept about 88 percent of patients who had private insurance in 2008, down from 93 percent in 2005, the study released today found. Patients in Medicare, the U.S. health insurance program for the elderly and disabled, also had a harder time finding a doctor. About 93 percent were accepted by physicians in 2008, down from 96 percent in 2005.

The drop in doctors willing to take private insurance was caused by low payments for services as well as administrative hassles from health plans, said Dr. Tara Bishop, an assistant professor of public health at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York.

“At a moment when the country is poised to achieve near- universal coverage, patients’ access to care could be a casualty of the collision between the medical profession and the insurance industry,” Bishop said in a statement.

The health-care overhaul signed into law in March 2010 requires people to buy private insurance policies and provides tax subsidies to help with the purchases. The Congressional Budget Office projects it will expand coverage to 24 million people.

The U.S. government is planning its own assessment of access to physicians under a “secret shopper” program that will have surveyors contact doctors’ offices trying to get appointments. Jay Carney, a White House spokesman, said at a briefing with reporters the initiative hasn’t started and that similar approaches have been used by past administrations.

In 2009, 57 percent of Americans under age 65 got health coverage through work, and 20 percent were on Medicaid or other public insurance programs, according to the Menlo Park, California-based Kaiser Family Foundation.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-06-27 14:46:26

And are these doctors finding a hidden store of patients to make up for those “undesirables” who don’t carry the kind of insurance that they yearn for? I doubt it.

If anything, they’re probably drumming their fingers, wondering where all the people went.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-06-27 14:49:50

“At a moment when the country is poised to achieve near- universal coverage”

What planet does he live on? Or is there another United States of America I haven’ heard of?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 20:04:11

“moment when the country is poised to achieve near- universal coverage”

So close, yet so far.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 13:45:45

There are always strings…

S.C. qualifies for $140M in fed money, groups say
The State News Paper

South Carolina could tap more than $140 million in federal money to save teacher jobs, school advocacy groups said Monday.

But that would require state and congressional lawmakers to agree to go after the money.

South Carolina is the only state that has not received money from the so-called federal education jobs fund, meant to preserve teachers’ jobs during The Great Recession, the groups said in a press conference. They called on S.C. political leaders to agree to apply for the money.

“We can’t do anymore,” said Paul Krohne, director of the S.C. School Boards Association. “It’s now up to the state and congressional leadership to make this happen and get these needed funds.”

The groups also want political leaders to apply for a portion of a $700 million federal “Race to the Top” money. That money would go toward strengthening education programs and creating new preschool ones.

But state Superintendent of Education Mick Zais and Gov. Nikki Haley, both Republicans, have said they will not apply for the “Race to the Top” dollars. Zais has said the federal dollars come with strings attached and would be used to start programs the state later would have to find a way to pay for on its own.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-06-27 15:29:31

We really need to get this over with, the U.S. dollar is done as the worlds reserve currency, sooner or later…

Dollar seen losing global reserve status
By Jack Farchy in London (FT)June 27, 2011

The US dollar will lose its status as the global reserve currency over the next 25 years, according to a survey of central bank reserve managers who collectively control more than $8,000bn.

That marks a departure from previous years, when the central bank reserve managers have said the dollar would retain its status as the sole reserve currency.

UBS surveyed more than 80 central bank reserve managers, sovereign wealth funds and multilateral institutions with more than $8,000bn in assets at its annual seminar for sovereign institutions last week. The results were not weighted for assets under management.

The results are the latest sign of dissatisfaction with the dollar as a reserve currency, amid concerns over the US government’s inability to rein in spending and the Federal Reserve’s huge expansion of its balance sheet.

“Right now there is great concern out there around the financial trajectory that the US is on,” said Larry Hatheway, chief economist at UBS.

The US currency has slid 5 per cent so far this year, and is trading close to its lowest ever level against a basket of the world’s major currencies.

Holders of large reserves, most notably China, have been diversifying away from the dollar. In the first four months of this year, three quarters of the $200bn expansion in China’s foreign exchange reserves was invested in non-US dollar assets, Standard Chartered estimates.

The prediction of a multipolar currency world replacing the current dollar dominance chimes with the thinking of some leading policymakers.

Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, last year proposed a new monetary system involving a number of major global currencies, including the dollar, euro, yen, pound and renminbi.

The system should also make use of gold, Mr Zoellick added. The results of the UBS poll also point to a growing role for bullion, with 6 per cent of reserve managers surveyed saying the biggest change in their reserves over the next decade would be the addition of more gold. In contrast to previous years, none of the managers surveyed was intending to make significant sales of gold in the next decade.

Comment by RedmondJP
2011-06-27 16:08:46

And this is why gold is going to keep going up, up and up!

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-06-27 16:14:08

Until it collapses just like in 1980….

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 20:06:28

Hey, don’t insult other’s religion.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-06-27 23:26:03

Yep.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-06-27 17:20:53

Little known fact: in the year before we invaded Iraq, they were in the process of converting their oil trade to Euros…

In the news yesterday: Russia and China agreed to trade oil in Yuan and Rubbles.

Uh oh.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-06-27 20:09:33

Sure, the first was well publicized. Only those with no memory aren’t aware. The latter has been broadcast for years. Let them trade in their own currencies. It is breaking your back, this holding up of the reserve status.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-06-27 17:12:06

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303627104576412172854764168.html

Bernanke “loans” the TBTF banks billions at near-zero interest, then they turn around and loan it to black holes like New Jersey for 9%. Of course NJ will default, and of course the Republicrats will ensure the taxpayers get billed for the full amount plus interest plus fees. Crony capitalism at its finest.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-06-27 17:36:26

Here’s something that’s probably difficult to quantify but I’ve been wondering how many of us are out there wtg for the sthtf, wtg to purchase, wtg to for a buying opportunity. I don’t mean how many hbbers but how many Americans. Or even what’s the proportion worldwide that is reading up every day and just watching, waiting.

I know there are no answers for this. Truly I wonder when market capitulation comes if I’ll even want to buy or if I’ll feel like there’s a better place for that still dry powder. Personally I’m looking forward to be able to talk about it all publically even though I think the hbb and several other sites are the best thing since sliced bread. Of course I’d still show up every day for the intelligent & insightful discourse as long as Ben still felt like making this space available.

But I have a hunch the reveal is nigh. And athough it’s ultimately frightening there’s a piece of me that is just so ready for J6pk and his higher income deniers to get a clue…..and then the real work begins.

Comment by Muggy
2011-06-27 18:36:41

Palmy said it before, but now that a lot of my target homes are within my target price range, I don’t want one.I will start accumulating cash again soon, but I have no idea where to put it. I’m even getting paranoid about IRA accounts. CU accounts are insured up to $250k so I have a long way to go until I need to worry.

“But I have a hunch the reveal is nigh.”

You know what’s messed up? I have a co-worker that was showing me pix of her home renovation, and then she admitted to me that when she finishes grad school she’ll be $150k in debt. We’re talking about a typical FL crapshack. I wanted to tell her to save her back and stop lifting all of those pavers… to each their own.

I hear Blue and Combo in my head a lot these days.

Cash is king. Debt is slavery.

Alad still bounces around in there a bit, too.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post