July 5, 2011

There Is No End In Sight In California

The Los Gatos Weekly Times reports from California. “More than 30,000 California families will face higher down payments, higher mortgage rates and stricter loan qualification requirements if conforming loan limits on mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are reduced beginning Oct. 1, according to analysis by the California Association of Realtors. ‘By reducing the conforming loan limit, thousands of California home buyers will be shut out of homeownership,’ said Beth L. Peerce, the state group president. ‘The higher mortgage loan limits are critical to providing liquidity in today’s housing market and are essential to our housing recovery.’”

The Press Democrat. “Three years ago, the federal government agreed to raise the limit on the mortgages it guarantees to as much as $729,750 in California and other states with more-expensive homes. The change resulted in maximum loan limits of $662,500 for Sonoma County and $512,500 for Mendocino County. Lake County received a maximum amount of $401,250 for FHA loans only. Unless Congress acts, Sonoma County’s limit this fall will drop to $520,950.”

“Nick Costa, president of American Mortgage Partners, said at his Ukiah office he rarely sees people who would be affected by the lower loan limit. ‘We’re in a first-time homebuyer market and first-time homebuyers aren’t buying $500,000 homes,’ Costa said.”

“Sonoma County’s condominium market is still bleeding, and no cities have been hit worse this year than Rohnert Park and Cotati. Nearly nine in 10 condos sold this year in the two cities were foreclosures or short sales. Condo sales in Rohnert Park and Cotati are ‘totally dominated by people who have to get rid of them,’ said Dave Roberts, an agent with Sotheby’s International Realty in Healdsburg who analyzed this year’s sales.”

“Prices have tumbled to the lowest level in 12 years. The median price for sales to date this year fell to $140,000, down 13 percent from the same period in 2010. Prices have dropped 62 percent since the peak year of 2006, when the median reached $365,000 during the first five months.”

The Record.net. “Martha Robles, a single mother of two young girls, is happy to have found a spot in the recently opened Gleason Park Apartments project in downtown Stockton. ‘It’s like I found the promised land here,’ she said.”

“But Robles’ experience is just one example of a larger problem for San Joaquin County. Despite the region being a poster child for the housing boom gone bust, with nation-leading foreclosure rates and imploding home prices, rental housing rates have actually increased. Almost half of San Joaquin County renters spend at least 35 percent of their income on gross rent and just over 28 percent spend 50 percent or more on housing.”

“One factor affecting the market may be foreclosure properties, said Terry Hull Sr. of Property Management Experts, one of Stockton’s largest rental management companies. Banks and lenders, having taken possession of homes, are slow to put them up for sale or rent, so they sit empty. ‘In effect, what they’ve done is reduce the supply of housing that is available,’ he said. ‘There’s been no supply. The only supply has been single-family housing that has been foreclosed.’”

The Press Enterprise. “Wil Herring, owner and president of MTG Experts and Baxter Wellington Real Estate in Moreno Valley and past president of the Inland Empire chapter of the California Association of Mortgage Professionals, said in the last couple weeks he has seen lenders start relaxing restrictions on home purchasers looking for a mortgage. ”

“What is more lenders are beginning to make loans to investors buying up to ten homes each, where before they set the limit at four homes per investor, he said. So what is going on? Herring figures there is a good chance that lenders are planning to release more of their so-called ’shadow inventory’ of homes they have foreclosed on but not yet listed for sale. Often the former owners have not been evicted, he observed.”

“‘I think they (lenders) are preparing to get rid of some of their forclosure inventory and want to make it easier for people to buy it,’ said Herring. ‘As it sits now we have to got move the properties because you can’t keep letting people live in houses who aren’t paying a mortgage.’”

The Camarillo Acorn. “The department of community development released its state-mandated annual report last week, highlighting Camarillo’s development throughout 2010 in housing, commercial and industrial properties. As part of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, Camarillo is expected to have 3,340 new homes built between 2008 and 2014.”

“The city is on track at 42 percent— or 1,392—of the seven year total. Yet zero homes were built in 2010 in the city. Camarillo approved only one new-home permit.”

The Tribune. “Jack Ranch Vineyard in Edna Valley, once one of the myriad holdings of Paso Robles businessman and developer David Weyrich, will be auctioned on the courthouse steps at 11:30 a.m. July 8. Lender RE Loans LLC., of Lafayette, reported an unpaid balance on the property of nearly $11.4 million. The ranch has an assessed value of nearly $5.8 million, according to public records.”

“In January, 47 parcels that foreclosed at Santa Ysabel Ranch in Templeton went back to R.E. Loans because no one bid for them at the foreclosure auction. The company reported at the time that they would attempt to market the home parcels, valued at a total of $8.2 million.”

The Marin Independent Journal. “The county assessor, citing a continuing slide in home values, has reduced the value of 27 percent of Marin’s residential properties, providing tax breaks for 21,600 homeowners. The move by Assessor Rich Benson eclipses adjustments made last year that reduced the value of 21 percent of the county’s residences in what was then the biggest reassessment purge since Proposition 13, providing breaks for 16,000 property owners.”

“Benson, noting declining values in a deflated real estate market, reduced assessed valuations for thousands of parcels ‘mostly because of the economic conditions that have existed’ for several years.”

“The assessment situation reflects a lackluster real estate market. The number of Marin single-family homes sold in May dropped 12.4 percent to 169 from a year ago, and the median sales price dipped slightly to $775,000. Annual median prices peaked in Marin in 2007 at $1 million for a single-family house and $570,000 for a condo.”

“Cyd Gardner, manager of the Greenbrae office of Frank Howard Allen Realtors, wasn’t fazed by news from the county assessor, saying she’s seeing ‘increased sales activity’ for those who price homes in line with the times. ‘We’re seeing multiple offers when homes are priced right,’ she said.”

The Mountain View Voice. “Local real estate development appears to be back in full swing, as a parade of developers came before the City Council Tuesday night. But it was a bad night for Mozart development, the high flying Palo Alto developer of 5.5 million square feet of office space in the Valley and numerous homes under its subsidiary, Classic Communities.”

“Earlier in the evening the council rejected another Mozart project, one that would have squeezed 14 three-story homes on a 0.8 acre, rhombus-shaped site. Member Margaret-Abe-Koga said the homes would have been affordable for families with the estimated average sale price of $587,500 for three- and four-bedroom homes. But she ended up voting against the project because it violated many of the city’s award winning row-home design guidelines with too little parking and no common areas, only private backyards. ‘Folks won’t socialize as much,’ she said.”

The Pasadena Star News. “Real estate guru Mike Ferry told a group of about 70 local real estate agents that the current market is the best it’s been in several years and that they need to change their behavior in order to capitalize on it. ‘I’m going to tell you the truth: this is the best market we’ve seen in the past five years,’ Ferry said. ‘But there have been many changes and things are difficult. That’s why you need to change your behavior.’”

“According to Ferry, the behavior of agents, brokers, sellers and buyers has been counterproductive and is the main reason the market has failed to benefit from low interest rates and low home prices. ‘The seller wants to list their property at the highest possible price … and the buyer wants to steal it at the lowest possible price,’ he said. ‘You need to change their attitude.’”

The Voice of San Diego. “House prices in America have now fallen further than they did in the Great Depression. An economic ‘double dip’ led by housing is almost upon us, with economists unable to agree how much further house prices could fall. America’s housing policies are making a dreadful situation unbelievably scary. It is time to change course and the first thing we must do is stop the foreclosure madness.”

“What sort of society throws a million families a year onto the economic scrap heap? What kind of country creates financial cripples out of ordinary citizens who did nothing wrong? People who just tried to achieve the American Dream and were led into a mortgage nightmare.”

“Instead of throwing home-owners out of their homes, let’s create policy that requires lenders to keep them in their homes. Instead of turning communities and cities and whole regions into economic wastelands, let’s put a floor under house prices.”

The Salinas Californian. “There’s one big reason why foreclosure reforms that strongly encourage banks to redo loans for ‘underwater’ homeowners are a must for California, and soon: This state’s overall economy and employment levels cannot recover to pre-recession status until the foreclosure crisis ends.”

“Places like Merced, Stockton and Fresno grew immensely in large part because of easy money made available by banks that demanded little or no down payment on houses and then sold off the mortgages they wrote, helping cause the Wall Street debacles of the past four years. That’s had a wide impact — thousands of homes now sit vacant after their occupants either were forced out via foreclosure or abandoned houses and mortgages when property values fell to the point where loan amounts topped home values, putting them figuratively under water.”

“With so many houses vacant, or even derelict, there is little or no demand for new housing. That means there’s little or no new residential construction under way or in prospect. Last September, the Associated General Contractors of America reported California construction employment was off by almost 51,000 jobs from the preceding year. Put these numbers together, and they suggest the construction industry has lost more than 250,000 jobs in this state since the foreclosure crisis began.”

“That doesn’t even count all the out-of-work real estate brokers, carpet salespeople, air conditioning installers, furniture salespeople, fence builders and more in myriad other construction and remodeling fields. California has been so dependent on homebuilding for so long that its virtual disappearance has led to an inevitable nightmare.”

“California needs actions that can somehow alter the foreseeable future. Foremost among these should be mortgage loan reforms, laws compelling banks to work with underwater homeowners on restructuring payments so homeowners won’t be on the hook each month for more than they’d pay to rent something similar to their houses. There are no signs Congress will do anything, so it may be up to state legislators to act.”

“Without this kind of move, there is no end in sight to the foreclosure crisis, high unemployment or the persistent recession.”




RSS feed

47 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-07-05 08:12:00

‘because of easy money made available by banks that demanded little or no down payment on houses and then sold off the mortgages they wrote’

I guess I have to repeat these facts: subprime loans didn’t take off until 2003. No-doc loans even later than that. Prime loans dropped sharply around the time subprime exploded. IMO, the industry started looking for new pools of buyers as the prime market was maxed out. So you can say that lending caused this or that, but the housing bubble was well under way before 2003.

And while we’re discussing easy money, what about this?

‘Three years ago, the federal government agreed to raise the limit on the mortgages it guarantees to as much as $729,750 in California and other states with more-expensive homes.’

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 08:31:24

Was it legal to federally guarantee $729,750 loans to wealthy Californians but not to wealthy residents of other states? One might argue that by providing a relatively larger artificial inflation boost to California homes, the law gave unfair advantage to California home owners over those in other states.

Comment by polly
2011-07-05 15:27:17

it is not illegal to give preferences to people based on state of residence. “Not a resident of California” isn’t a protected class.

 
Comment by Space Case
2011-07-06 14:19:29

I don’t believe thats what they did. California is referenced as an example, isn’t it?

 
 
Comment by rms
2011-07-05 11:32:34

“Three years ago, the federal government agreed to raise the limit on the mortgages it guarantees to as much as $729,750 in California and other states with more-expensive homes.”

Increased lending risk means increased cost of money, nothing new here. Market forces, right?

 
Comment by Overtaxed
2011-07-05 11:36:58

729K was such an eye-popping number that I can’t believe the nobody in the MSM did the math to see what income bracket that law was subsidizing.

To afford a 700K+ home, you have to have income of 200-300K/yr. I don’t care what part of the country you’re in, that’s a very high annual income. And that person (making close to 10X the median income) needs a “government handout” to be able to buy their home?

Frankly, even 400K is too high (assuming 20% down, that’s a 500K house, which, again, is not what the median citizen is buying, that’s top 10% only). But 700K was really just obnoxious.. Come on, these folks are making 1/4 of a million dollars a year, and somehow, they need government help to buy their houses??

Comment by michael
2011-07-05 13:45:36

and the NAR lobbying machine goes nuts when they mention lowering the threshold.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-06 07:04:23

By 2007, $729k had become the minimum number required to purchase a house. You could get an 80-year-old cottage in San Jose that was built for farm workers, and that would cost you $729k. You were considered “poor” at that price point. POOR!

Comment by jbunniii
2011-07-06 16:20:08

You can buy a pretty nice house in San Jose these days for $729k, but I think the same house will be $600k or less a few years from now, so I’m not biting yet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by traderjack
2011-07-05 17:57:33

Ben Jones, you have hit the nail on the head and driven it home.

When the prices of home exceed the median incomes the demand goes down, the only way to keep selling homes is to lower the income requirement, and , of course, credit requirements.

First you get the buyers who can afford anything, when they buy, then you have to go to less desirable buyers, and the system finally requires that if you want to sell houses you have to sell houses to people who can not afford to buy a tent in the field.

There is a finite limit to buyers who can afford to buy homes, and when the developers can’t stop developing, and everyone is making money , and want to keep on making money, they have to find ways to get people to buy, come hell or high water.

I saw it start back in the 60’s

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-05 08:21:32

Didn’t have time to do this again so I Googled it, and guess what.

The Housing Bubble Blog » Bits Bucket for May 28, 2011
28 May 2011 … The Housing Bubble. Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, …… Seems they don`t foreclose in southern California …
http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=6508 - 244k - Cached - Similar pages

Albert Hammond
It Never Rains in Southern California

Got on board a westbound seven forty seven
Didn’t think before deciding what to do
Ooh, that talk of opportunities, Flippin shows and movies
Rang true, sure rang true

Seems they don`t foreclose in southern California
Seems I’ve often heard that kind of talk before
They don`t foreclose California
Cause lawyers there will warn ya
It`s MERS, man it`s MERS

Out of work, I’m out of my head
Out of self respect, I’m out of bread
I overpayed, I’m underfed, I wanna free home

They don`t foreclose California
cause lawyers ther will warn ya
It`s MERS, man it`s MERS

Will you tell the folks back home I nearly made it
Had offers but don’t know which one to take
Please don’t tell ‘em how you found me
Don’t tell ‘em how you found me
Gimme a break, give me a break

Seems they don`t foreclose in southern California
Seems I’ve often heard that kind of talk before
They don`t foreclose California
Cause lawyers ther will warn ya
It`s MERS, man it`s MERS

Comment by Overtaxed
2011-07-05 11:38:07

Hey Jeff.. I’ve always wondered.. Does you’re last name start with an “O”? If so, I read you quite a bit, and used to comment extensively (before they changed the system to the garbage one they have now) on your articles.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-07-05 08:23:09

Nearly nine in 10 condos sold this year in the two cities were foreclosures or short sales. Condo sales in Rohnert Park and Cotati are ‘totally dominated by people who have to get rid of them,’ said Dave Roberts, an agent with Sotheby’s International Realty in Healdsburg who analyzed this year’s sales.”

“Prices have tumbled to the lowest level in 12 years.

Is this the despair part of the curve?

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 08:32:37

‘totally dominated by people who have to get rid of them,’

AKA yesteryear’s savvy investors…

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-05 12:11:06

Ben has told us many times that Condo Mania happens at the last. Perhaps then Condo Despair happens at the first.

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-07-05 12:16:53

I was repeating it. I read that quote from Jack McCabe in Florida, probably in 2005. I think it was something like, condos are the last to take off and the first to crash.

The first part has to do with the timing; getting them to market before the boom ends. The second is they crash first because they are ill-conceived as far as housing goes. I would add that condo conversions (from apartments) are the very last to take off and generally crash even before regular condos. (Assuming the regular condos were ever started at all).

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 19:37:16

Something else I have thought about regarding how condos fall early and harder:

During a boom, when inventory is snapped up in bid wars, any given condo park will have only a very few units for sale at any given time. Consequently, so far as prospective buyers are concerned, these condos have a similar “uniqueness factor” to SFRs. If more than one buyer is interested in one of these condos, there may be few if any close substitutes on the market, and a bid war may ensue.

Flash forward to the bust: The same condo park which may have only had one or two units on the market at any point during the boom may now sport ten or more identical units for sale. If any of the owners tries to raise the price, on the assumption their unit is special, there are nine or more identical places which can be purchased for less. A proliferation of identical units makes condos behave more like commodities than SFRs do as the market goes down, resulting in a faster correction of condo units to prices in line with fundamentals.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 20:43:39

Condos in this development sold for $127K or so — around $89/sq ft — back in 1996. This is based on first-hand knowledge. :-)

For Sale (MLS-listed)
$129,900
2553 GROVEVIEW Dr Richmond, CA 94806
Beds: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq. Ft.: 1,462
$/Sq. Ft.: $89
Lot Size: -
TYPE: Townhouse
STYLE: Contemporary
STORIES: 2
VIEW: Other
Year Built: 1986
Community: Hilltop
County: Contra Costa
MLS#: 40531411
Source: EBRD
Status: Active

On Redfin: 7 days
FABULOUS 2 STORY UNIT, ALL NEW INTERIOR CARPETS & PAINT, 3 BED, 2.5 BATHS, APPROX. 1462 SQFT, 2 CAR GARAGE, PATIO, WALK TO SHOPPING, TRANSPORTATION.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 20:44:59

“…around $89/sq ft — back in 1996…”

Note this was the nominal dollar price back then. 1996 dollars were worth quite a bit more than 2011 dollars; hence the current REAL PRICE is a lot lower than the 1996 price.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-06 07:09:10

Oh woe is me. I despair all day. I live in a pit of despair. I stayed for years and paid no rent, and now I’m getting cash for keys and have to sell it short. Oh, when will it be my summer again? The cold and dark and silence is deafening. Woe is me.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-07-05 08:25:50

The mu$ic is changing, is the piano tuner finished? ;-)

“Prices have tumbled to the lowest level in 12 years. The median price for sales to date this year fell to $140,000, down 13 percent from the same period in 2010. Prices have dropped 62 percent since the peak year of 2006, when the median reached $365,000 during the first five months.”

“Nick Costa, president of American Mortgage Partners, said at his Ukiah office he rarely sees people who would be affected by the lower loan limit. ‘We’re in a first-time homebuyer market… and first-time homebuyers aren’t buying $500,000 homes,…

That’s right Nick, here pick one that you like: (not anymore. not just yet. not for awhile. not till the the U$ Deficit is at $127.00. not till it cost $3.00 to watch a NASCAR race. not ’till Alfafa blow dries his hair.)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 08:38:55

‘The seller wants to list their property at the highest possible price … and the buyer wants to steal it at the lowest possible price,’

Sounds to me like the seller wants to steal a 2006 housing bubble price premium from the buyer. It won’t work, because the buyer doesn’t have a 2006 crazy loan available to fund the purchase.

Comment by Dale
2011-07-05 17:20:47

“…..let’s put a floor under house prices.”

That’s funny, their was never a call to put a ceiling on house prices, even when it was obvious no one could afford them.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 20:24:07

Mr Market himself put the ceiling on home prices.

But why Uncle Sam assumes it is his solemn duty to put in an artificial price floor, at the cost of a virtual shutdown of the pace of used home sales, is a mystery to me.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-06 07:13:48

Conditional morality.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-07-05 08:39:04

Forwarding this to exeter! (This is gonna be a no-holds-bar champion title belt match)

RAL get your “attitude-adjustment” suit on! :-)

‘I’m going to tell you the truth: this is the best market we’ve seen in the past five years,’ Ferry said. ‘But there have been many changes and things are difficult. That’s why you need to change your behavior.’”

“According to Ferry, the behavior of agents, brokers, sellers and buyers has been counterproductive and is the main reason the market has failed to benefit from low interest rates and low home prices. ‘The seller wants to list their property at the highest possible price … and the buyer wants to steal it at the lowest possible price,’ he said. ‘You need to change their attitude.’”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-05 11:27:39

‘You need to change their attitude.’

Just how do they propose to do that? At gunpoint perhaps?

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-07-05 11:35:53

The seller or the buyer?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 08:40:49

“Instead of turning communities and cities and whole regions into economic wastelands, let’s put a floor under house prices.”

Didn’t they try this?

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-05 08:49:43

“Instead of turning communities and cities and whole regions into economic wastelands, let’s put a floor under house prices.”

“Didn’t they try this?”

By Jeff Ostrowski Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 10:12 p.m. Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Chart shows brakes slammed on house price declines in 2009.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/consumer-confidence-slips-in-south-florida-where-home-1568434.html - 84k -

 
Comment by snake charmer
2011-07-05 09:08:31

People getting the short end of that scenario don’t even enter the writer’s mind, just like the people slammed by artificially low interest rates and who aren’t part of the national discussion. Wordlessly and soundlessly sacrificed, and for what?

It’s bad enough to have an economy and culture that forces us to gamble with our money and to pay Wall Street while doing so, but what’s worse is that certain bets aren’t allowed to pay off and certain entities aren’t allowed to lose.

Comment by snake charmer
2011-07-05 10:18:26

And the author, by the way, is the Chairman of a real estate investment company called the Barratt Group, which for me completely invalidates his plea for the “million families a year being thrown on the economic scrap heap.”

http://www.barratt.com

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-05 12:13:11

We can save them, by throwing the entire country on the scrap heap!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 08:44:01

“With so many houses vacant, or even derelict, there is little or no demand for new housing. That means there’s little or no new residential construction under way or in prospect. Last September, the Associated General Contractors of America reported California construction employment was off by almost 51,000 jobs from the preceding year. Put these numbers together, and they suggest the construction industry has lost more than 250,000 jobs in this state since the foreclosure crisis began.”

It’s odd how almost no MSM writers seem capable of connecting the housing bubble’s aftermath to the unsustainable frenzy of lending, building and home buying that preceded it.

 
Comment by KenWPA
2011-07-05 08:55:34

“California needs actions that can somehow alter the foreseeable future. Foremost among these should be mortgage loan reforms, laws compelling banks to work with underwater homeowners on restructuring payments so homeowners won’t be on the hook each month for more than they’d pay to rent something similar to their houses. There are no signs Congress will do anything, so it may be up to state legislators to act.”

“Without this kind of move, there is no end in sight to the foreclosure crisis, high unemployment or the persistent recession.”

_I am very confident that the state legislators will come up with a very intelligent, well thought out plan to solve all of the state’s problems. Obviously more government interference in this market is what the Doctor ordered.

It isn’t fair that someone might be able to rent a house for a lower payment than a genius homebuyer is paying to own the home. Plus the renters don’t have to feed the squirrels, bake cupcakes or any of the other responsibilities of home ownership. It ain’t fair! It ain’t fair!

 
Comment by jess
2011-07-05 10:27:36

Why does the word, “community” become a more popular used word at this present moment in time? Where was the community when the few were speaking. Jobless /wageless recovery didn’t happen overnight.

Although, I am reminded that during the depression everyone in the “community” was in the same situation therefore, the “shame of losing” was contained.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-07-05 11:39:08

I am a little concerned about what that might mean for me/us going forward. If things get worse will we need to make even more of an effort to lay low and not appear to be in a different financial situation than the FBs? In order to avoid triggering the “shame of losing”?

Ideally they’d take it out on Wall Street, but we’re a lot closer…

Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-07-06 15:53:10

I think most of us live below the radar already. I doubt if there will be a battle between Fooked Buyers and the renters of multiple unit dwellings anytime soon. If you rent everything, you own nothing. What’s to take?

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-07-05 16:56:31

‘By reducing the conforming loan limit, thousands of California home buyers will be shut out of homeownership,’ said Beth L. Peerce, the state group president. ‘The higher mortgage loan limits are critical to providing liquidity in today’s housing market and are essential to our housing recovery.’”

Translation: The dissemblers of the CAR are having a hissy fit because it’s getting harder to make a quick killing by putting future FBs into overpriced crapboxes they have no possibility of actually affording over time. I bet southern California used car lots are filling up with Mercedes and BMW SUVs, while applications at strip joints (a more noble calling than selling real estate, it must be said) must be soaring.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 20:21:36

“…(a more noble calling than selling real estate, it must be said)…”

I’m guessing more than a few former used home sales people have applied for positions in that more noble profession.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 16:59:09

Unless I misread this report, there were 51,906 new foreclosures in CA for May 2011. And 3,585 in San Diego alone (annualized level of 43,020).

No end in sight, indeed!

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-05 20:19:53

“1 in 259 CA housing units were foreclosed in May 2011″

Q. Over about how many months at this pace would ONE IN FOUR CA housing units have undergone foreclosure?

A. 259/4 = about 65 months / five years and five months
(65 / 259 = 0.251)…gulp.

 
 
Comment by rms
2011-07-05 18:13:56

Wow, housing incest is encouraged!

Bill Calls for Fannie, Freddie Merger
http://tinyurl.com/3r5dr24

 
Comment by rms
2011-07-05 18:39:33

Coastal comfort v. inland heat:
http://tinyurl.com/67j2l9h

Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-07-06 15:54:56

The Central California coast is almost always in the 60s this time of year. I wish I was living there, but still gotta work.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-06 07:01:07

BAAAAAAAhahahahahhahahah!

 
Comment by lavi d
2011-07-08 12:23:09

“Without this kind of move, there is no end in sight to the foreclosure crisis, high unemployment or the persistent recession.”

Why yes. Yes there is.

When a house costs what an average couple can afford working in the service industry - then the foreclosure crisis will end.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post