July 15, 2011

Bits Bucket for July 15, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

219 Comments »

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 03:35:56

Dimon Says Mortgage Clash Swells as ‘Everybody Is Going to Sue’
(Bloomberg) 7-15-11

JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said clashes over faulty mortgages may drag on as investors and regulators demand compensation for soured loans issued at the peak of the housing market.

“There have been so many flaws in mortgages that it’s been an unmitigated disaster,” Dimon said during a conference call today. “We just really need to clean it up for the sake of everybody. And everybody is going to sue everybody else, and it’s going to go on for a long time.”

JPMorgan disclosed about $2.5 billion in second-quarter costs tied to faulty mortgages and foreclosures. The bank added $1.27 billion to litigation reserves, mostly for mortgage matters, and incurred $1 billion of expenses tied to foreclosures, according to a slide show accompanying today’s earnings report. Repurchase losses were $223 million, according to the company, which ranks second by assets among U.S. banks.

Banks are struggling to stanch losses tied to loans based on missing or wrong data about borrowers and properties and are facing probes of foreclosures that may have used falsified documents. Lenders led by Bank of America Corp. (BAC) have reimbursed investors for losses on mortgages, and New York-based JPMorgan said it has $3.3 billion in costs so far on repurchases from government-backed firms such as Fannie Mae.

JPMorgan’s additional litigation reserve may help cover “fees and assessments related to foreclosure delays and payments for other settlements,” including probes by the U.S. Department of Justice and the state attorneys general, the bank said. Litigation reserves also cover projected costs tied to so- called private-label mortgage bonds that may have contained faulty loans, the lender said.

Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 11:57:26

They should Make Angelo Mozillo work it off by posing nude for calendars and stuff. He would be the perfect cover boy for October, the month when orange is popular.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2011-07-15 13:53:14

Do you really think that nude photos of a guy in his 70’s will help sell calendars?
Get the barf bags…

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-07-15 12:05:37

“WE just really need to clean it up for the sake of everybody”

As the Indian Scout said to Custer at the Little Big Horn: “What’s this WE $hit, paleface?”

How bout this plan? You guys created the problem. You fix it. On your nickel. And while you’re at it, pay for it with some of them money you paid out in bonuses and inflated “too valuable to lose” salaries to all the pukes that decided that bypassing the system was a good idea.

Of course, by “clean up”, he probably means give the banksters/fraudsters a “Get out of Jail Free” card.

Comment by Al
2011-07-15 20:23:10

“And while you’re at it, pay for it with some of them money you paid out in bonuses and inflated “too valuable to lose” salaries to all the pukes that decided that bypassing the system was a good idea.”

Take every penny in compensation from every ‘c’ type exec.

 
 
Comment by Max Power
2011-07-15 13:49:36

Nobody needs to step in an clean anything up. The market and the existing laws are taking care of it as we speak. Some people just don’t like what it appears the outcome is going to be. lots of lawsuits and it’s going to cost a lot of people and corporations a lot of money. If you don’t like that outcome, too bad. Should have thought about that beforehand.

If YOU want to modify contracts, reduce principal, etc then go right ahead. But don’t demand a massive rule change in the middle of the game. Got to play by the rules that were set up when the game started. If you don’t like the score, you should have played the game differently.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 03:37:05

Bank Delays May Push 1 Million U.S. Foreclosure Filings to 2012
(Bloomberg)

Lender delays in processing home- loan defaults will push as many as 1 million U.S. foreclosure filings from this year to 2012 or beyond, casting an “ominous shadow” on the housing market, according to RealtyTrac Inc.

The number of properties receiving a notice of default, auction or repossession plunged 29 percent in the first half of 2011 from the same period last year, the Irvine, California- based data seller said today in a report. About 1.17 million homes got a filing, or one out of every 111 households.

Procedural delays caused by a probe into bank documentation errors, combined with weak consumer sentiment and a jobless rate above 9 percent, are weighing on a property recovery by adding to a backlog of distressed homes, RealtyTrac said. A clogged foreclosure pipeline may prevent real estate prices from finding a bottom as the housing slump enters its sixth year.

“If you accept the premise that foreclosures are the black cloud hanging over the market, we’re not going to get price stability and people won’t leave the sidelines until that cloud is cleared away,” Nicolas Retsinas, professor of real estate at Harvard Business School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, said in a telephone interview.

U.S. home prices fell 33 percent from a July 2006 peak through April, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index of 20 cities. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said in testimony to Congress yesterday that ongoing weakness in home values is reducing household wealth and limiting consumer confidence.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 03:38:51

Muni Default Plunge Belies Whitney as Borrowers Shun Insolvency
(Bloomberg)

Time is running out for Meredith Whitney’s municipal-market default prediction to come true.

Defaults fell 60 percent in the first half of 2011 compared with the same period last year, including a $12.5 million Austin, Texas, apartment project that made a late payment in June, according to Distressed Debt Securities Newsletter.

Whitney, a bank analyst, predicted “hundreds of billions of dollars” of municipal defaults within 12 months in a Dec. 19 “60 Minutes” broadcast, fueling a wave of selling in the $2.9 trillion market. Instead, the number has fallen as cities slashed spending to balance budgets and state lawmakers stepped in to guard against insolvency and local bankruptcies.

“The data is not helping Meredith,” said Matt Fabian, a managing director at Municipal Market Advisors, a financial- research company based in Concord, Massachusetts. “It’s always been a possibility there would be a wave of defaults. You can’t say that it’s zero but it’s given no sign of starting.”

From January through June, defaults fell to 24 totaling $746 million, according to the newsletter from Miami Lakes, Florida-based Income Securities Advisor. That compares with 60 in the first half of last year, totaling $2.29 billion, and 144 in the first six months of 2009, at $4.89 billion.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 05:31:19

They want to get rid of Whitney, that much is clear. She won’t be wrong; she just may be late. Duration duration duration…

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-15 05:42:25

The whole debacle is moving along like a glacier.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-15 05:51:17

“She won’t be wrong; she just may be late.”

Given enough time, any prediction will come true. I hereby predict the end of the world.

Comment by wolfgirl
2011-07-15 08:01:32

The trick to predictions is to not give a date.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:01:08

She is only late because of unforeseen emergent circumstances, such as a serious delay in foreclosure filings (blamed on “robosigning”).

But I thought she was talking about bond defaults anyway.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 08:43:36

She was right on Citi. Roubini was right on the whole mess.

Roubini’s muni doom prediction is WAAAAY more tame than Whitney ($100B total, over a period of years).

PIMCO isn’t on the muni default bandwagon, but they did for a time avoid US debt (so they aren’t completely ignoring risk/reward).

I think there is a good possibility that she’s simply wrong in this case.

Comment by scdave
2011-07-15 09:55:18

Even with all the municipal cutting its fairly easy to balance your budget when you have the ability to raise your revenue “at will”…Our utilities and city fee’s have gone verticle. Far, Far above the inflation rate…We are talking 20% or more at a crack…Ditto will health Insurance….What can you do ?? The answer is go without or pay…

I will tell you one problem that is often discussed but not being addressed but points to even further increase in you municipal expenses…That is the differed maintenance that continues to pile up…I suppose the way out of the problem is to privatize it…However, Its bad enough to see your municipal cost spiral up…Its salt on the wound to see 5 municipal workers and three trucks standing around a 4 X 6 hole in the ground…

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-15 11:29:34

You should have seen what happened on our street a year ago…they posted no parking signs for street repaving…ok no problem street got grated….2 weeks later same thing no parking on Monday for re pavement…

Except no one came….tuesday they started towing cars at 9 am no warning no notice and then the city later ticketed those same towed cars because the tow truck driver parked them in front of fire hydrants….talk about mad. some even got towed…. it made the news and everyone was embarrassed.

———
However, Its bad enough to see your municipal cost spiral up…Its salt on the wound to see 5 municipal workers and three trucks standing around a 4 X 6 hole in the ground…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-15 12:54:23

Want to fight that parking ticket in Mass UT will cost you!

Vincent Gillespie said the $319.90 cost of appealing his July 19, 2005, parking ticket in Hampshire Superior Court far exceeded the $15 fine.

http://mobile.masslive.com/advmasslive/pm_102996/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=RKybAqpG

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-07-15 04:00:35

Foreclosure delays could hold off housing rebound
USAToday

Foreclosure actions — including default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — will be filed on about 2 million homes this year, 1 million fewer than there should be based on the number of delinquent loans, says market researcher RealtyTrac.

Delays occur for a variety of reasons, including mortgage servicing firms’ uncertainty about future foreclosure rules. Federal and state officials and the mortgage industry are negotiating a settlement that is likely to define those.

The delays mean borrowers get more time in homes without paying mortgages. They also have led to fewer distressed homes for sale, which has probably curbed price declines, says economist Mark Zandi at Moody’s Analytics.

Yet the delays extend the time to clear the housing market’s supply of distressed homes, which pull down prices of other homes.

“Foreclosures are getting delayed and that will delay the housing recovery, too,” says RealtyTrac Senior Vice President Rick Sharga.

Nationwide, more than 6 million home loans are delinquent or in foreclosure.

Home prices, down more than 30% from their 2006 peak, cannot rebound until there are fewer distressed home sales, says Stan Humphries, chief economist for real estate website Zillow.com. Current and future foreclosures and high unemployment are the two biggest drags on the U.S. housing market, he says.

In May, distressed homes accounted for 31% of existing home sales, selling at a 20% discount to non-distressed homes, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Foreclosures may pick up late this year or early next as uncertainty about new regulations subsides, says Jason Kopcak, a mortgage loan expert at Cantor Fitzgerald.

Companies have probably delayed foreclosures as they await the federal-state settlement, Sharga says. Major mortgage servicers submitted plans Wednesday to improve their processes that were mandated by federal banking regulators. Those plans will be reviewed by regulators and may change depending on the settlement with state and federal officials.

The foreclosure slowdown began last fall after revelations that tens of thousands of foreclosure cases may have been improperly handled.

Foreclosure filings through June were down 29% year-over-year, RealtyTrac says. Homes lost to foreclosure in the second quarter were in the foreclosure process for an average 318 days — 41 days longer than in the same quarter last year.

The falloff in foreclosures has been sharper in some states. In Connecticut, Maryland, New Jersey and New York, foreclosure sales are down more than 70% since September, says mortgage tracker LPS Applied Analytics. The average drop nationwide was 37%.

States that clear their foreclosures quickly will probably see prices increase faster than those that take longer to absorb foreclosure inventories, Zandi says.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-15 07:16:10

“Nationwide, more than 6 million home loans are delinquent or in foreclosure.”

Shadow inventory for everyone!

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 09:15:46

We also need to consider three things when thinking about the 6MM number:

1. While new delinquencies are slowing, there are more foreclosures to come, especially given the number of homes still underwater. While slowing, this will still happen at a greater pace than historically “normal”;
2. The exit from being delinquent is not always foreclosure (there are self-cures–someone missed one payment, short sales, renegotiation of debt); and
3. “normal” levels of delinquencies/foreclosure is about 5% of loans (per LPS, in December 2005, delinquent loans were 4.66% of total, and foreclosures were 0.48% of total, for just over 5% of all loans in some sort of trouble). In May 2011, we were at 12%. 5% represents 2.5MM loans. 6MM needs to shrink to 2.5MM to get to “normal”…not 0.

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-07-15 09:46:54

The diverted mortgage payments (in the form of consumer purchases) from these individuals are now necessary to prop up “the Recovery”. Expect no foreclosures any time soon.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:04:58

They don’t have that in Canada.

Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:06:37

Yes they do, tardV McGee. It’s CHINA where they don’t have that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:09:29

DUMMIES!

They have that everywhere except for Australia. It’s like you guys never even took Special Austrailian Econ 101. Didn’t you even go to kindergarten? You probably went to kindergarten for Americans, where they dumb everything down for the smaller brains of the kids there.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:13:35

It saddens me to see so many small-potatoes people such as yourselves arguing over something that you will never be a part of. You should accept your lot in life and gracefully allow the smarter, faster, stronger corporate executives to guide the world economy however they might. Besides, don’t you have some work you should be doing right now?

 
Comment by Max Power
2011-07-15 13:57:28

I declare Big V the winner of that debate. Hands down.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-07-15 14:29:52

I’m not so sure…the other one had some good points.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-07-15 04:03:56

Stranger moves into foreclosed home citing Texas law

FLOWER MOUND - A little known Texas law and a foreclosure could have a man in Flower Mound living on easy street.

Flower Mound’s Waterford Drive is lined with well-manicured $300,000 homes. So, when a new neighbor moved in without the usual sale, mortgage-paying homeowners had a few questions.

“What paperwork is it and how is it legally binding if he doesn’t legally own the house?” said Leigh Lowrie, a neighboring resident. “He just squats there.”

Lowrie and her husband said the house down the street was in foreclosure for more than a year and the owner walked away. Then, the mortgage company went out of business.

Apparently, that opened the door for someone to take advantage of the situation. But, Kenneth Robinson said he’s no squatter. He said he moved in on June 17 after months of research about a Texas law called “adverse possession.”

“This is not a normal process, but it is not a process that is not known,” he said. “It’s just not known to everybody.”

He says an online form he printed out and filed at the Denton County courthouse for $16 gave him rights to the house. The paper says the house was abandoned and he’s claiming ownership.

“I added some things here for my own protection,” Robinson said.

The house is virtually empty, with just a few pieces of furniture. There is no running water or electricity.

But, Robinson said just by setting up camp in the living room, Texas law gives him exclusive negotiating rights with the original owner. If the owner wants him out, he would have to pay off his massive mortgage debt and the bank would have to file a complicated lawsuit.

Robinson believes because of the cost, neither is likely. The law says if he stays in the house, after three years he can ask the court for the title.

He told News 8 his goal is to eventually have the title of the home and be named the legal owner of the home.

“Absolutely,” he said. “I want to be owner of record. At this point, because I possess it, I am the owner.”

Robinson posted “no trespassing” signs after neighbors asked police to arrest him for breaking in.

Flower mound officers say they can’t remove him from the property because home ownership is a civil matter, not criminal.

Lowrie and her neighbors continue to look for legal ways to get him out. They are talking to the mortgage company, real estate agents and attorneys. They’re convinced he broke into the house to take possession, but Robinson told News 8 he found a key and he gained access legally.

“If he wants the house, buy the house like everyone else had to,” Lowrie said. “Get the money, buy the house.”

Robinson said he’s not buying anything. As far as he’’s concerned, the $330,000 house is already his and he has the paperwork to prove it.

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 06:00:23

wow…a selling price of zero…that will set the comps.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 06:08:04

Hey, it’s Texas. Can’t they just shoot him?

Comment by scdave
2011-07-15 10:01:28

That was my thought also…

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-07-15 06:12:22

But, Robinson said just by setting up camp in the living room, Texas law gives him exclusive negotiating rights with the original owner.

Robinson posted “no trespassing” signs after neighbors asked police to arrest him for breaking in.

Flower mound officers say they can’t remove him from the property because home ownership is a civil matter, not criminal.

So what stops the next squater to move in when Mr. Robinson is out having lunch somewhere??

And cite them same laws?

And put up their own signs?

Mr. Robinson seems to want it both ways.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 06:25:38

That right thar is the makin’s of a reality show on the tee-vee…

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-15 07:32:47

So what stops the next squater to move in when Mr. Robinson is out having lunch somewhere??

“an online form he printed out and filed at the Denton County courthouse for $16 “

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 07:42:34

and the key.

mr. robinson had the key.

the other guy would be a criminal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-15 06:14:54

10 years in NY.

 
Comment by measton
2011-07-15 08:02:03

Seems that the neighbors would want someone owning the home and taking care of it.

This is really about the neighbors being angry that this guy did his homework and may get a house for almost nothing, and it’s all legal.

Sour grapes

 
Comment by Montana
2011-07-15 09:15:51

Lots of states have adverse possession laws. It’s 5 years here. They were designed for situations like this, where property is being wasted. It was one of my favorite legal topics, and it’s interesting to see it put in to use.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-07-15 12:11:57

Dig a well, and set up a wind turbine to pump it out and supply electricity, and he’s on easy street.

This assumes that the wind blows in Texas.

Comment by Steve J
2011-07-15 12:56:51

The mound in Flower Mound is not that tall.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:16:29

That’s what they get for abandoning the house.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-15 12:23:57

Yes, and they don’t care. The catch here is if the bank just processes the foreclosure and takes title, they can then go and yell at the guy telling him to leave and his three years is shot in the ass.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2011-07-15 14:21:28

Isn’t Texas a Deed of Trust state?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 14:45:13

“if the bank just processes the foreclosure and takes title, ”

But the mortgage company he got the loan from went out of business. What’s that? Someone must own the note? Well, of course, let’s just run it through MERS and well see who that is.

Oh, wait a minute…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-07-15 04:05:17

Jamie Dimon for president.
Rich people are job creators.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 05:56:23

Realtors are sages of truth.

 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-15 07:22:00

“Prosperity is just around the corner” - President Hoover, 1932

 
Comment by measton
2011-07-15 08:03:03

Why would he want to be president when he can make tons of money owning one?. His income would be a lot less if he were president, plus he would have to disclose it to the public.

Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-07-15 09:02:01

Jamie’s turn to take one for the team. Similar to Hank Paulson’s stint as Secretary of the Treasury.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 10:14:44

Exactly why we get the politicians that we have. The financially savvy are too busy milking a broken system to spend their time fixing it.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 04:08:53

U.K. Rightmove House Prices Fall in July
(Bloomberg)

U.K. home sellers lowered asking prices in July for the first time this year as a mortgage squeeze deterred buyers, Rightmove Plc said.

Asking prices dropped 1.6 percent from the previous month, when they had gained 0.6 percent, the U.K.’s biggest property website said in an e-mailed statement today. Seven out of 10 properties listed in 2011 are still available for sale, which Rightmove described as a “sobering reflection” of the market.

“We expect further falls over the next few months as buyer momentum ebbs away due to a combination of seasonal factors and a continuing lack of both mortgage finance and buyer confidence,” Miles Shipside, commercial director of Rightmove, said in the statement.

Values are up 0.1 percent from a year earlier to an average 236,597 pounds ($382,000). The monthly decline is the first since December, when asking prices fell 3 percent.

Seven of 10 regions tracked by Rightmove showed declines in July from June, led by a 3.5 percent drop in East Anglia. Asking prices in London fell 1.4 percent to an average 432,641 pounds, though they are still up 2.5 percent on the year.

The capital “is a less price-sensitive location than other parts of the country,” Shipside said. Nevertheless, “many of its buyers still require finances and so are also susceptible to the tightening of mortgage lending, pressure on income and the rising cost of living.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 04:10:32

Consumer Comfort in U.S. Rose Last Week on Boost in Finances
(Bloomberg)

Consumer confidence in the U.S. rose last week as households became more upbeat about the state of their finances and optimism climbed among wealthier Americans.

The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index increased to minus 43.9 for the period ended July 10 from minus 45.5 the prior week. Even with the gain, which is within the survey’s 3-point margin of error, the gauge is lower than it was at the start of the year.

While cheaper gasoline prices since May helped stabilize optimism, Americans’ assessment of the U.S. economy soured to a 15-week low. The pessimism likely reflects employment gains in June that were the smallest in nine months, a possible risk to consumer spending that accounts for about 70 percent of the world’s largest economy.

“Consumers are feeling a little bit better about the fact that gasoline prices have come down materially over the last several weeks,” said Russell Price, a senior economist at Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. in Detroit. “But on the other side of the coin, the lack of any real traction in job growth” is also weighing on consumers.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-15 05:36:07

In my neck of the woods gas prices are rising again, after falling a paltry 30 cents.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-07-15 12:15:03

Around here, dropped to $3.29 for about a week in mid-June, currently back up to the $3.50-ish range. For no good reason that I can see.

 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-15 04:17:38

Realtors Are Liars

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 04:46:59

“We have to keep all the options on the table. We don’t know where the economy is going to go”

~ Ben Bernanke

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 04:58:37

Return of the Gold Standard as world order unravels
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard - The Telegraph UK.

As the twin pillars of international monetary system threaten to come tumbling down in unison, gold has reclaimed its ancient status as the anchor of stability. The spot price surged to an all-time high of $1,594 an ounce in London, lifting silver to $39 in its train.
gold nuggets and bars

On one side of the Atlantic, the eurozone debt crisis has spread to the countries that may be too big to save - Spain and Italy - though RBS thinks a €3.5 trillion rescue fund would ensure survival of Europe’s currency union.

On the other side, the recovery has sputtered out and the printing presses are being oiled again. Brinkmanship between the Congress and the White House over the US debt ceiling has compelled Moody’s to warn of a “very small but rising risk” that the world’s paramount power may default within two weeks. “The unthinkable is now thinkable,” said Ross Norman, director of thebulliondesk.com.

Fed chair Ben Bernanke confessed to Congress that growth has failed to gain traction. “Deflationary risks might re-emerge, implying a need for additional policy support,” he said.

The bar to QE3 - yet more bond purchases - is even lower than markets had thought. The new intake of hard-money men on the voting committee has not shifted Fed thinking, despite global anger at dollar debasement under QE2.

Fuelling the blaze, the emerging powers of Asia are almost all running uber-loose monetary policies. Most have negative real interest rates that push citizens out of bank accounts and into gold, or property. China is an arch-inflater. Prices are rising at 6.4pc, yet the one-year deposit rate is just 3.5pc. India’s central bank is far behind the curve.

“It is very scary: the flight to gold is accelerating at a faster and faster speed,” said Peter Hambro, chairman of Britain’s biggest pure gold listing Petropavlovsk.

“One of the big US banks texted me today to say that if QE3 actually happens, we could see gold at $5,000 and silver at $1,000. I feel terribly sorry for anybody on fixed incomes tied to a fiat currency because they are not going to be able to buy things with that paper money.”

China, Russia, Brazil, India, the Mid-East petro-powers have diversified their $7 trillion reserves into euros over the last decade to limit dollar exposure. As Europe’s monetary union itself faces an existential crisis, there is no other safe-haven currency able to absorb the flows. The Swiss franc, Canada’s loonie, the Aussie, and Korea’s won are too small.

“There is no depth of market in these other currencies, so gold is the obvious play,” said Neil Mellor from BNY Mellon. Western central banks (though not the US, Germany, or Italy) sold much of their gold at the depths of the bear market a decade ago. The Bank of England wins the booby prize for selling into the bottom at €254 an ounce on Gordon Brown’s orders in 1999. But Russia, China, India, the Gulf states, the Philippines, and Kazakhstan have been buying.

China is coy, revealing purchases with a long delay. It has admitted to doubling its gold reserves to 1,054 tonnes or $54bn. This is just a tiny sliver of its $3.2 trillion reserves. China’s Chamber of Commerce said this should be raised eightfold to 8,000 tonnes.

Xia Bin, an adviser to China’s central bank, said in June that the country’s reserve strategy needs an “urgent” overhaul. Instead of buying paper IOU’s from a prostrate West, China should invest in strategic assets and accumulate gold by “buying the dips”.

Step by step, the world is edging towards a revived Gold Standard as it becomes clearer that Japan and the West have reached debt saturation. World Bank chief Robert Zoellick said it was time to “consider employing gold as an international reference point.” The Swiss parliament is to hold hearings on a parallel “Gold Franc”. Utah has recognised gold as legal tender for tax payments.

A new Gold Standard would probably be based on a variant of the ‘Bancor’ proposed by Keynes in the late 1940s. This was a basket of 30 commodities intended to be less deflationary than pure gold, which had compounded in the Great Depression. The idea was revived by China’s central bank chief Zhou Xiaochuan two years ago as a way of curbing the “credit-based” excess.

Mr Bernanke himself was grilled by Congress this week on the role of gold. Why do people by gold? “As protection against of what we call tail risks: really, really bad outcomes,” he replied.

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 05:41:54

Alad posted his “goodbye” message about 3 years too early.

Comment by palmetto
2011-07-15 06:19:58

I was a confirmed “gold bug” for many years. I drank gallons of that Kool-Aid daily. After watching Bill Still’s documentary, I did a very sharp about-face and started eating crow instead of drinking Kool-Aid.

A gold standard, especially an international one, is EXACTLY what you don’t want. Who do you think’s gonna have all the gold if we go that way?

But, you see, this whole debacle can be used to institute an international gold standard. Or jade standard. Or amethyst standard. Or dog turd standard.

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:27:12

“Or dog turd standard”

We already have that one.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 06:37:45

“Or dog turd standard.”

What’s so interesting about the gold thing, is if it really goes their way, and I mean REALLY goes their way, do they think people are going to give them lettuce and a cow for a piece of metal?

Again, when gold becomes that valuable, I’m thinking what most people will really want is something to eat.

He who has the cow makes the rules.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-15 07:46:43

What’s so interesting about the gold thing, is if it really goes their way, and I mean REALLY goes their way, do they think people are going to give them lettuce and a cow for a piece of metal?

But what are the chances of the end of the world like that? I mean it’s never happened so far so who cares what gold would buy then? Because it’s the “end of the world.” And even in Europe during the plagues the depression and WWI and WWII gold bought a lot of stuff.

do they think people are going to give them lettuce and a cow for a piece of metal?

Of course. If not gold then lead. (a godbug’s 2nd favorite metal)

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-15 08:07:03

After WWI in Germany, many with an ounce of gold bought entire businesses for that sum. This led to a lot of resentment, aimed particularly at one ethnic group. Later, there were energetic attempts to wipe that ethnic group off the planet.

I dare say there are havenot haters around still and such things are possible in the future lest we take care.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-15 09:36:20

I dare say there are havenot haters around still and such things are possible in the future lest we take care.

Exactly. The PTB better take care and read some history. And a way to “take care” would be to liberally re-distribute the wealth and opportunities back to the poor and middle-class by taxing the rich and corporations at past historical levels, reverse globalization, cut the military and spend saved money on “socialized” medicine with a private option, enact tariffs, support small over large businesses, bust trusts, institute publicly financed campaigns and criminalize crony-capitalistic corruption.

(and I mean it but let me know if I need to use any more inflammatory buzzwords)

 
Comment by mathguy
2011-07-15 12:08:51

Rio,

You start out right :

a way to “take care” would be to liberally re-distribute the wealth and opportunities back to the poor and middle-class

but you ask to do it in a partially bad way:

by taxing the rich and corporations at past historical levels

I agree we need to end our military forays and the “military-industrial complex”, and reign in globalization, but I think that you miss the reason we have the huge wars is because the Feds have been raiding supposedly “good” entitlement programs to fund the wars. Giving them more money to “redistribute” will just ensure they redistribute it to their cronies in the M.I.C.

IMHO, we need to get rid of personal income tax, and create a flat 30% employment tax on all wages paid.. no deductions at the personal level. Spend or save, it is up to you, but no subsidies for housing, cars, energy efficient lightbulbs, kids, marriage, etc… Then to address the wealth gap, we need to tariff imports in all countries that don’t follow UN human rights guidelines (or even better, strict US guidelines) and environmental controls similar to the US, and pay a living wage. Those tariffs can fund social programs. In the meantime, jobs should come back to the US as the tariffs level the playing field for who gets to sell into our home market, and at what cost.

 
Comment by mathguy
2011-07-15 12:11:04

Oh, and also increase capital gains to match the 30% employment tax.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 16:00:48

Blue and Rio, thanks for your thoughts. So… I am screwed?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-15 05:51:27

Mr. Bernanke, you are the really really bad outcome.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:19:50

“So gold is the obvious play”.

BUT - When everyone’s buying it, then there must come a time for everyone to sell it!

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 15:23:34

Then sell yours.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-07-15 15:45:29

Gold is about to start a mania spike, not sure how long it will last. Timing the top will take a bit of luck, common sense and open eyes.

Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-07-15 17:56:28

I am enjoying the spot price climb. I expect to be out west this December selling a few ounces to my favorite dealer as I do my annual asset rebalancing. Then relax around the fireplace with a glass of Silver Oak Cab in Az! Low temps will be in the 30s that time of year.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 05:11:28

Note how TTT excludes himself in his comment, rightfully so I guess because he will never feel any pain economically.

-Timothy Geithner in an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press a few days ago:

“It’s going to feel very hard, harder than anything they’ve experienced in their lifetime now, for a long time to come.”

Comment by palmetto
2011-07-15 06:05:22

OK, what happened to my “that’s what she said” comment?

Really, I just couldn’t resist.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-07-15 12:18:45

Damn…..beat me to it…..

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 05:27:15

What Happened to the $2.6 Trillion Social Security Trust Fund?
WASHINGTON, DC - Forbes - Merrill Matthews

Here’s how President Barack Obama answered CBS’s Scott Pelley’s question about whether he could guarantee that Social Security checks would go out on August 3, the day after the government is supposed to reach its debt limit: “I cannot guarantee that those checks [he included veterans and the disabled, in addition to Social Security] go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.”

And Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner echoed the president on CBS’s Face the Nation Sunday implying that if a budget deal isn’t reached by August 2, seniors might not get their Social Security checks.

Well, either Obama and Geithner are lying to us now, or they and all defenders of the Social Security status quo have been lying to us for decades. It must be one or the other.

Here’s why: Social Security has a trust fund, and that trust fund is supposed to have $2.6 trillion in it, according to the Social Security trustees. If there are real assets in the trust fund, then Social Security can mail the checks, regardless of what Congress does about the debt limit.

President Obama’s budget director, Jack Lew, explained all this last February in USA Today:

“Social Security benefits are entirely self-financing. They are paid for with payroll taxes collected from workers and their employers throughout their careers. These taxes are placed in a trust fund dedicated to paying benefits owed to current and future beneficiaries. … Even though Social Security began collecting less in taxes than it paid in benefits in 2010, the trust fund will continue to accrue interest and grow until 2025, and will have adequate resources to pay full benefits for the next 26 years.”

Notice that Lew said nothing about raising the debt ceiling, which was already looming, and it shouldn’t matter anyway because Social Security is “entirely self-financing” and off budget. What could be clearer?

Unconvinced, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer wrote a subsequent column questioning Lew’s assertions. “This [Lew’s] claim is a breathtaking fraud. The pretense is that a flush trust fund will pay retirees for the next 26 years. Lovely, except for one thing: The Social Security trust fund is a fiction. … In other words, the Social Security trust fund contains—nothing.”

Merrill Matthews is a resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation in Dallas, Texas.

Comment by palmetto
2011-07-15 05:53:49

“but if it had real assets the president wouldn’t be talking about seniors missing their checks.”

Not necessarily true, IMO. First of all, the writer assumes the president knows whereof he speaks. I doubt if the president does. Secondly, there’s nothing better TPTB like to do than mau-mau the public to death. Fear, fear! I saw that statement as a deliberate effort to get a bunch of geezers on the phone to their Senators and Representatives, all panicked about raising the debt ceiling. Hey, it worked for TARP, so why not? The statement made by the president was deliberate and meant to take advantage of the fact that most people don’t know how Social Security is supposed to work. Hoodwink-wink!

Third, the writer has a naked agenda: “Had we shifted to a system of pre-funded, personal Social Security retirement accounts years ago,”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-15 06:09:42

Third, the writer has a naked agenda: “Had we shifted to a system of pre-funded, personal Social Security retirement accounts years ago,”

If anyone could have done an even worse job with SS funds than the gov’t, it would have been Wall St.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 06:28:00

Naked agenda is right. I commented on who is funding all these friendly “non-partisan” folks. It will show up in a minute.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 06:23:24

Institute for Policy Innovation in Dallas, Texas.

Ya know, I’m seeing a lot of opinions from “non-partisan” experts from “non-partisan” Institutes, and Foundations, and Orgs these days. I’ve gotten into the habit of looking them up. It’s quite the eye-opener. IPI’s mission on IPI DOT org:

Advocating lower taxes,
fewer regulations,
and a smaller, less-
intrusive government.

From sourcewatch DOT org:

“The Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI) is a think tank based in Lewisville, Texas and founded in 1987 by Congressman Dick Armey to “research, develop and promote innovative and non-partisan solutions to today’s public policy problems. The conservative Capital Research Center ranked IPI as amongst the most conservative groups in the US, scoring it as an “eight” on a scale of one to eight. ”

Biggest funders (more at sourcewatch):

Carthage Foundation $245,000
John M. Olin Foundation $305,000
Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation $470,575
Sarah Scaife Foundation $225,000

Let’s check out these Foundations:

The Carthage Foundation and the Scaife Foundation are the same outfit — money from Mellon [yes, that Mellon] heir Richard Mellon Scaife.

Olin Foundation supports conservative causes — mainly about “freedom” — but is being phased out. [Why? Maybe, not enough money? The Olin chemical fortune was only $90 million... :-( ]

“The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to The Bradley Foundation 1998 Annual Report, was giving away more than $30 million per year. Harry was one of the original charter members of the far right-wing John Birch Society, along with another Birch Society board member, Fred Koch, the father of Koch Industries billionaire brothers and owners, Charles and David Koch.”

———–

Short version: More wingnut welfare!

Comment by chilidoggg
2011-07-15 07:14:29

Did you know Tax Freedom Day did not change from 1980 to 2007? We’re all still working to May 2 to pay for all government spending.

http:// www dot taxfoundation dot org /taxfreedomday/

 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-07-15 08:45:12

oxide
Great post, thank you. The so called “Think Tank” was one of the tricks of “The Engineering Of Consent” Edward Bernays was famous for. Thanks for doing the research, oxide.

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-07-15 19:11:28

So did you only research conservative based think tanks?
or..Did all the liberal think tanks come up clean as a whistle?

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-15 20:26:38

It looks like the research was just for the author(s) of the article. Relevant, IMHO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-07-15 06:25:17

we can and will pay SS benefits 1st but something will have to give. We borrow $134B per month with no ability or intention to pay it back how moral is that? Why should your children be burdened with this debt or the resulting collapsed economy so that we can spend more than we have?

is obama using scare tactics or does he intend to not pay the ss benifits to current seniors?

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 06:36:45

“Why should your children be burdened with this debt or the resulting collapsed economy so that we can spend more than we have?”

because we can…until the bond market says we can’t.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:40:50

“is obama using scare tactics or does he intend to not pay the ss benefits to current seniors”?

Pure politics, nothing more. The SS checks will go out. It’s just that the old geezers are very easily upset, and they raise hell about it. Plus they certainly cast votes.

Some of the loudest are the ones that have received back all of the money that they paid in and are now living out of other peoples pockets.

Comment by measton
2011-07-15 08:11:02

I hope he holds ss and medicare just so we can see the look on the Tea Party faces when it happens. What do you mean I don’t get a check this week. I’d love to see the face of local business owners when 30% or more of their customers go poof. Then the corporate CEO’s would be next, of course they’ve planned for this by borrowing massively at low rates so they can get their bloated paycheck good times or bad.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-07-15 09:24:06

old people should suffer so you can see the look on my face?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 14:50:56

old people should suffer because the rich refuse to pay a penny more in taxes, despite the fact that they’re currently paying the lowest rates in modern history?

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 16:17:55

No, old people should suffer for a whole week, just to inform them of exactly what they are voting for.

 
 
 
Comment by salinasron
2011-07-15 06:59:53

“is obama using scare tactics or does he intend to not pay the ss benifits to current seniors?”

It’s scare tactics, but I’m willing to call his bluff? So he withholds some payments, maybe people will wake up and pay attention to the real world around them.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-15 10:38:38

So he withholds some payments, maybe people will wake up and pay attention to the real world around them.
go buy some dog food.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-15 07:16:41

Keep harping on *morals*. Do it every day as loudly as you can.

 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-07-15 10:44:25

The gov must spend to prevent an even worse depression. History taught us that. O has the right plan.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 13:28:27

+1

I just wish he’d spend it on the middle class, not on bailing out billionaires. Sometimes he reminds me of Neville Chamberlain, thinking he can make ‘peace in our time’ with the Wall Street plutocrats.

As Churchill said of Chamberlain’s treaty, ‘with some people, there can be no peace’.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 13:40:20

As FDR said about the same plutocrats,

“They are unanimous in their hatred of me. And I welcome their hatred.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 13:41:39
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-15 14:44:57

Big diff between Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Obama: Being born into wealth and privilege. Which gave Franklin a first-hand education in how “organized money” operated. And still operates to this day.

OTOH, Obama came up from modest means. So, he didn’t have the skepticism about “organized money” that Roosevelt may have developed during childhood.

Just read Obama’s Audacity of Hope description of his ride on a corporate jet. He was dazzled — bigtime.

For Roosevelt, a ride on such a jet wouldn’t have been that big of a deal. When it comes to riding in style, he’d been and there done that since infancy.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 15:09:16

I agree, Slim. It also made it much harder to convince people he was a commie/socialist, who was ‘attacking the rich’ and ‘engaging in class warfare’, since he was himself rich, and from the upper class.

Not that they didn’t try.

The Repubs have lived ever since in mortal fear of another FDR. They even got the two-term limit on presidencies put in place to forestall another one, and it ended up biting them in the a$$, because Reagan was the first guy since FDR who could have won a third term. Ha-ha.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 15:22:20

Yea it’s “taught” us that all right! See were it got us.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 11:27:40

My understanding is that the “Trust Fund” has been lent to the US government (part of the $14.3T debt). If I’m correct, then the trust fund could refuse to roll it’s debt, and require the US government to pay off any of the notes that are coming due. The US government could issue new debt to replace that rolling debt to generate the cash needed to pay the benefits and still stay under the debt limit.

They would be refinancing one lender (the SS trust fund) with another (China? the Fed?) in order to write the checks.

The question is whether the loan maturities match with the need.

This is all of course assuming the the government acts financially logically.

Comment by polly
2011-07-15 13:11:52

Setting up a bond sale takes some time and figuring out how to convince anybody to *buy* bonds because these aren’t being issued in excess of the debt ceiling (therefore illegally) because they are being used to redeem other bonds of eaqual amount would really take some time. And since you have to issue them to get the money to redeem the other ones, I don’t know that there is any way to do it without going over the debt ceiling - not unless you do it in advance which means not paying some other bill before you actually have run out of cash.

When I was doing foreign sovereign debt issuances we could do an easy take down from an already established tranche in about 24 hours, but that was only because it was an easy take down from an already established tranche. Anything complicated would have take a lot more time. And that was just the lawyer part of the deal - the bankers had to do their stuff as well and I’m guessing that they couldn’t do all of it at the same time as we were pushing our paperwork. Some of their part must have been before and after we did our part.

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 13:40:40

Since there is money coming in, there can be a cash cushion built of some amount, alleviating the chicken/egg issue. Depending on how much they needed in order to bridge the gap between Payroll taxes and debt rollover, I’ll bet they could call Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, etc., and get a line of credit at 3% up to $10Billion…or more. The odds that a default on US debt lasting any significant length of time is small, and someone out there would be willing to lend at 2-3% points higher than the current market almost certainly.

There is also the Fed, that would probably be willing to expand it’s own balance sheet at the drop of a hat at lower rates, as the SS Trust Fund shrinks.

I’m not saying it is likely, but I’m sure they would figure out a way to spend as much money as humanly possible without going over the debt ceiling.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 13:43:54

Here’s the more precise answer Polly:

http://www.startribune.com/politics/125606908.html

Damn near impossible to make it work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2011-07-15 15:27:25

Which is fairly close to what I said - it is complex and there is an issue with “redeeming” old bonds with new bonds because of the timing.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 15:58:44

I wasn’t aware however, of the laws surrounding the treatment of SS receipts. If that were not forced into buying Treasury securities, there could be a way to build the cushion. A grand debt shift to keep paying SS looks to be improbable.

Let’s face it though, the gutless in DC won’t fail to come up with some ridiculous “compromise” that will allow the debt ceiling to be raised. If they are too fearful of their own political future to raised taxes when needed, or cut spending when needed, they are certainly too fearful to allow even a temporary US default.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 05:44:37

“In an already lean budget year, Florida’s public schools are facing yet another challenge: Finding money to build badly needed new schools and fix crumbling old ones.

The state’s primary fund to help schools pay for construction, the Public Education Capital Outlay, dropped from $254.2 million last year to just $51.3 million in the 2011-12 school year.

And though legislators found enough money to bump that to $77 million, they decided not to give the state’s traditional K-12 public schools any of it.

So where is that money going? Charter schools, colleges and universities. Lawmakers earmarked about $55 million for just the charters…”

http://www.tampabay.com/news/education/k12/as-florida-school-construction-money-dries-up-charter-schools-are-the/1180581

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 05:55:42

BTW, Charter Schools are allowed to deny certain students admission and expelling basically for any reason. Since they discriminate, they should not receive public funds.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 06:45:08

I’ve been wondering about this for some time, Muggy. What do you think of charter schools which have admission tests based on merit, and can expel based on bad behavior?

One of the reasons that the US ranks so low in world education is that we mandate school up the age 16 for everybody, not just the middle or the elite. If, for example, China tried to educate all the hundreds of millions of poor kids in the villages who didn’t have the brains or drive or money to move to the cities, their rankings would drop too…

But in the US, they try to educate everybody. So what you get is public schools where good kids and the smart kids are ignored in favor of the attention getters and discipline cases and kids who need extra attention, and the like.

I was a smart kid in a working-class school 30 years ago. I was lucky in that the working class — although not great academically — at least behaved themselves enough to not be too disruptive. I was also lucky that states still had enough funding to support art and music and PE and excel classes for talented-and-gifted. I can’t imagine what it’s like now, with drugs and guns and kids who were brought up with ONLY Spanish (stupid stupid parents couldn’t even turn on Sesame Street so the kids could learn English). In today’s world i would have benefitted greatly from a charter-type school. I understand that you don’t want a polarization into schools with good kids and schools which are basically jails, but what other fair alternative is there?

Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:25:20

Public schools should be able to handle all the kids. They can have accelerated classes for the smarter ones and remedial classes for the ones who have fallen behind.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-15 13:12:23

Money spent in Spanish only classes are a waste of taxpayer money.

They should learn in Spanish in thier own time.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 15:59:04

“They can have accelerated classes for the smarter ones and remedial classes for the ones who have fallen behind.”

My new job is overseeing exactly this ^^ at 5 schools where neither of those options existed last year. I am excited about it.

 
Comment by Pete
2011-07-15 16:11:18

“Money spent in Spanish only classes are a waste of taxpayer money. They should learn in Spanish in thier own time.”

I’m with you as far as teaching Spanish-speaking children in Spanish, but many schools are “Spanish Immersion”. It’s fairly popular here in CA, don’t know about other states. Anyway, English-speaking children are enrolled by their parents in this program. Sometimes it’s a whole school–West Davis Elementary ten years ago became all Spanish Immersion, and changed it’s name to Cesar Chavez Elementary. Kindergarten-3rd grade is all Spanish. They are “immersed” in it. In the later elementary grades, English is slowly mixed in more, until by 6th grade, it’s 50-50, and voila, bilingual kids. Whether this is a benefit to our society or not remains to be seen, but parents aren’t forced to use the program. And their kids learn their English at home. Now, if I had my druthers, there would be “Italian Immersion”, but I don’t see that happening.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 17:59:09

“What do you think of charter schools which have admission tests based on merit, and can expel based on bad behavior?”

I think it violates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. I have no idea how so many are getting away with it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Dave of the North
2011-07-15 07:14:42

In the good or bad old days, depending on your POV, all schools did this. Certain kids didn’t get in (e.g. mentally handicapped) and the behaviour problems were expelled and the kids that couldn’t keep up with the material quit as soon as they could (age 16 up in these parts). Also the high schools streamed the academic kids into different classes based on grades (more or less) and had different programs - Industrial, Home Ec, Business etc. (vocational programs).

All that was swept away in the 70’s and 80’s as our schools became inclusive and non-discriminatory. The stated goal that everyone would graduate from high school with the same type of diploma meant that the curriculum had to adapt to fit all students. In an unrelated development, universities found that incoming students couldn’t read, write or do math very well. In another unrelated development, schools now have grad classes with 65-75% honour students compared to 10% when I graduated in 1969.

 
 
Comment by Kirisdad
2011-07-15 06:10:06

My nephew goes to a FL charter school that is owned by… a FL legislator.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-15 06:46:22

You mean Charters don’t have to be non-profits?

I’ve heard that corruption in the south is bad, but I never thought that it was this open.

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 06:57:22

“TALLAHASSEE — A Tallahassee mother of three said she filed an ethics complaint this week against state Rep. Erik Fresen over his family’s ties to a charter school company.”

http://www.tampabay.com/news/education/k12/ethics-complaint-filed-against-state-rep-erik-fresen/1166765

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Kirisdad
2011-07-15 07:58:22

Read the comments Muggy, John Legg and the Daysprings academy.

 
 
Comment by measton
2011-07-15 08:15:10

This is what privitization is all about my friends. Another privitize the gains, ceo makes money, teachers make less. Then socialize the losses, poor students get kicked out and more so than now take to a life of crime.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-15 13:51:54

Private colleges get Federal/State money.

They don’t let in everyone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 15:14:27

Private colleges get Federal/State money?

 
Comment by polly
2011-07-15 15:32:01

Research grants, Pell grants to students, subsidized student loans, etc.

If you want to go a little further, many are tax exempt and that can be classified as a “tax expenditure.” However, I don’t know if any of them would make a tax profit on their school operations under existing rules. They get a big benefit from being exempt from property taxes.

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-15 11:38:53

Muggy:

I don’t understand why they wont spend money on teaching kids English? what wrong with being able to read and understand the NY Times in exchange for your HS diploma?

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-07-15 19:17:20

“In an already lean budget year, Florida’s public schools are facing yet another challenge: Finding money to build badly needed new schools and fix crumbling old ones.”

I don’t think Florida needs any new schools; we have more than we need now. Popoulation growth has slowed to a crawl and schools were built way out there on the boom planning cycle. No one knows how to shrink, only to grow.

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-16 06:06:28

Hi CrackerJim, the article is talking about repairing schools, too. Both new construction and major repairs come from capital outlay funds.

I don’t know of any district in my area that is building schools. They simply want the roof to stop leaking.

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-15 06:05:31

Don’t know if this made the HBB earlier this week. From the Northern Virginia HBB:

“Northern Virginia’s June 2011 housing sales were down 18% YoY, and median prices were up 8%. The average days on the market increased by 24% to 51 days.”

Fifty-one days! In most areas the average DOM is probably five or more times that. In NoVA, buy now or be priced out forever.

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 06:18:46

i would love to see the terms to those mortgages.

i bet they are still “sub prime”.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 06:56:38

Wait… sales are down, therefore inventory is up, and median price is …up? Who repealed the law of supply and demand?

However, I think I know what’s happening. Duration duration duration has yet to hit DC. The government hired a lot of employees and a lot of contactors in the past 3 years, including me. We newbies have been here a while, and we’re sick of rents that are just too damn high. This is actual pent-up demand.

Yes, the government has most stopped hiring, and offered a few buyouts for people retiring, but the jobs cuts haven’t come yet. We are only at 2004 prices now.

There was a VERY steep run-up from 2002-2004. Houses here have dropped greatly, but they leveled at 2004 pricings. I’ve seen this in the Zestimate history for almost every house in the area. I’m waiting for the final drop from 2004 prices to 2002 prices. I think — really — that the bottom for DC is still 2-3 years away, probably at 2002 prices.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-15 11:06:47

“Wait… sales are down, therefore inventory is up, and median price is …up?”

Doesn’t this simply highlight the potential pitfalls of using median price as an indicator?

It could be explained by a complete shutdown of purchases on the low end. Poof! The new sample set now shows only high end (or shall we say, high priced) home sales, thus adjusting the median up.

It doesn’t indicate that prices on individual homes or home types actually went up.

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 12:14:47

there is definiately a shift in vienna, virginia.

a year or so a go most of the homes on the market were the lower end…now most of the inventory is 900K+.

i think the northern, va area was a little late to the party…but boy did they party.

i bet alot of the high end homes bought with 5 to 7 year arms are just now beginning to reset…and that is why there is an excessive amount of high end homes just now reaching the market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
Comment by howiewowie
2011-07-15 15:15:28

It’s funny, to us here in Lee County, Sarasota isn’t considered Southwest Florida. We consider Charlotte, Lee and Collier counties as SW Fla. I guess we must be South Southwest Florida to those in Sarasota because I know we’re not South Florida…that’s Miami and surrounding communities on the other side of the state.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-07-15 06:18:51

Gawd I LUV public unions…

It is not as though it is real money - it is only taxpayer money.

—————————–

Dearborn Gives Four Problem Teachers $197K to Go Away
Michigan Capitol Confidential | 7/14/2011 | Tom Gantert

At the Dearborn Public Schools, the administration wanted to get rid of two teachers accused of sexual misconduct and two more that were accused of possession of illegal substances outside of school. The district ended up paying the four teachers a combined total of $197,353 to get them to quit their jobs.

Yet this outcome may have been the fiscally prudent one from the perspective of the local taxpayers. The district says its analysis of going through a costly and lengthy tenure process in each of those cases would have cost a total of nearly $400,000. They based this on the costs of two cases in which they did go through the tenure process.

“The perception is you are buying out a bad teacher. ‘Why are we paying these people?’” said Timothy Currier, the attorney who handles tenure cases for Dearborn Public Schools.

But Currier said it’s cheaper than going through the tenure process, which can cost the district more than $170,000 for two cases and take about 10 months.

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-15 06:34:19

“accused of sexual misconduct” and “accused of possession of illegal substances” is not the same as “convicted”.

If these people are found guilty of these crimes then they can be fired and jailed. Until then they are considered innocent.

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-15 06:53:45

If any child at any time points his or finger at any adult - male or female - and says that this adult molested him/her the the adult is automatically put on the defense to the extednt that his/her life is in jeapardy of being totally destroyed.

No evidence need be presented, just the accusation.

Go back twenty-five-or-so years and take a look at the McMartin Pre-school case here in So Cal for a good example.

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 07:23:49

i have seen a few documentaries discussing these types of false allegations.

at the center of every story is some asshole cop.

i saw one where at the appeal the prosecutor actually said the following to the the three judge panel.

“but…children don’t lie.”

the female judge who quickly envoked her experience with her on children basically berated the prosecutor openly in court for such nonsense.

The defendents won the appeal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-07-15 12:38:09

Yeah they could fire them. And run the risk of paying out money for wrongful termination and back pay if the charges are dropped, or if they are found not guilty.

Of course, we have a certain percentage of people in this country who think “Due process” should be thrown in the crapper for expediency, and to save a few bucks.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 15:22:12

Due process is for producers. Little people are presumed guilty. Especially if they belong to a union. And are accused of possessing dried plants.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:29:26

Where in the article did it say the teachers were accused of molesting a child? They could have been having sex with each other. That would probably count as misconduct.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-07-15 18:26:23

Back in those days I was a young version of the computer geek that I am now. In the high desert of California. I could tell that the case was a witch hunt. It taught me to avoid any dealings with kids. If they fell off a bike in front of my house and skinned a knee, I would call the police first before going to assist. That is how the witch hunt made me paranoid of being a good adult citizen at an early age.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-15 15:30:40

I know a superintendent for the Dallas Scool District that got caught with an 8-ball. He teaches kindergarten in Austin now.

 
 
Comment by hondje
2011-07-15 06:19:49

…If you build it, they will come…! er, right..?

From todays Houston Business Journal
Bayport Cruise Terminal: Same fate as Astrodome?

Could the vacant $108.4 million Bayport Cruise Terminal become Houston’s next Astrodome?

That’s the question I posed to Harris County Judge Ed Emmett, as a follow up to my July 8 Houston Business Journal print edition story about cruise operators ignoring the Port of Houston Authority Port of Houston Authority

Emmett told me the empty facility reminds him more of San Antonio’s unsuccessful attempt to secure an NFL team by constructing the Alamodome.

The county judge said the terminal could become another empty edifice like the Astrodome in the long run, but if it does, it would be the Port’s problem, not the county’s.

He said many people confuse the Port Authority with Harris County because the county handles the Port’s tax collections. He said the only connection between the two is through Port Commission appointments. Harris County Commissioners Court appoints two people to the Port Commission and appoints the Port Chairman jointly with the city of Houston.

Emmett said the Port’s RFP ended up like he expected it would.

“Clearly, I wish it had gotten some responses,” said Emmett, who was not in county government when the terminal was proposed. “I didn’t really expect them to immediately get a response, but it was good for the Port to remind the cruise industry that it is there.”

The judge had higher hopes for the terminal in 2008, when he told the Houston Chronicle that he was not worried about landing a cruise line.

“I have confidence in the folks at the Port,” Emmett said at the time. “They will get a cruise line. I know everybody is a little frustrated at the delay.”

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-15 09:54:05

“I have confidence in the folks at the Port,” Emmett said at the time. “They will get a cruise line…”

Just sit right back and you’ll hear a tale,
A tale of a fateful trip
That started from this tropic port
Aboard this tiny ship.

The mate was a mighty sailing man,
The skipper brave and sure.
Five passengers set sail that day
For a three hour tour, a three hour tour.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:20:14

Currency guru,Chuck Butler, sez:

“Let me remind you that in August, there will be about $500 Billion in Treasuries come due… And with those maturities come interest payments that are due… So, let’s just say that the whole enchilada $500 Billion gets “rolled”, new issues get sold to pay off the maturing bonds… Where does the money come from to pay that ‘interest’? Ahhh grasshopper… Well, it either comes from the taxes that we pay, or it gets added to the debt… and that’s why the debt ceiling will get raised before those bonds come due!”

Comment by NJGuy
2011-07-15 15:25:28

IIRC, That 40% of outstanding debt is due this year and 70% buy 2014. Notice that the pols want 2.4 billion to last to 2014.

I think they will need more but it covers a lot of debt rollover.

Comment by NJGuy
2011-07-15 15:31:35

Oops…it Trillions not billions

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:24:47

Citigroup posts 6th quarterly profit in 2Q
Citigroup records 6th quarterly profit as losses from failed loans decline
July 15, 2011

NEW YORK (AP) — Citigroup Inc. turned a profit for the sixth straight quarter as losses from failed loans declined.

The New York bank says losses from bad loans fell 35 percent during the quarter to $5.4 billion. That allowed the bank to release $2 billion from its loan loss reserves and count it as income.

Net income rose 24 percent to $3.3 billion, or $1.09 cents per share, on revenue of $20.6 billion. That compares to net income of $2.7 billion, or 90 cents per share, during the same quarter last year. The earnings per share was adjusted to account for a reverse split, where 10 Citi shares were exchanged for one this May.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:35:26

I can hardly wait for QE-3! All us kooks that were buying Au&Ag 10 years ago are feeling just terrible about the stupid move we made.

Go B.B. Go mighty U.S. Dollar Print, baby print!

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:44:32

From Germany’s Der Speigel

“With no solution to the US debt crisis in sight, the rest of the world is starting to get nervous. German commentators urge congressional leaders to get their act together. A US default would have catastrophic consequences, they warn.”

- The only holdup to raising the debt ceiling is the jousting between Republicans and Democrats for position. They will strike a deal voters will find unappealing, so each side must try to come across as doing the least damage. Bottom line: American austerity lies ahead and the big trick is to postpone it until after election day, 2012.

President Obama meets the press this morning to discuss the impasse..

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-15 07:01:16

Am I the only here on this message board that thinks all this is screwy, that things have been turned upside-down?

If a country is struggling to live within its means then it should be considered a GOOD credit risk, not a bad one.

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 07:13:18

“If a country is struggling to live within its means”

Question, which country are you talking about?

Surely it can not be the U.S.of A. Because we aren’t struggling we are fighting not to live within our means. Some of our citizens may be but the country is not.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-15 07:39:27

wmbz, you beat me to it. For most people it’s, “Don’t touch MY cheese! Oh, and don’t you dare raise my taxes!”

Only difference between us and Greece is that we’re not rioting in the streets. Yet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-07-15 10:58:51

They aren’t raising taxes on 90% of us. Who cares. If you spend (Bush) you must pay some day!

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 11:12:19

“They aren’t raising taxes on 90% of us”.

Now that’s funny, where did you get that info?

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-07-15 11:29:16

If you spend (Bush)Congress, both democratic- and republican-controlled

 
Comment by Pete
2011-07-15 16:28:06

“Now that’s funny, where did you get that info?”

The 2005 census has 85% of the US population making under 100,000 in 2003. I don’t have today’s info, but it’s close enough. Obama’s notion, right or wrong, of raising taxes on those who make over 250,000 amounts to less than 2% of the population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States

If he lowered that income threshold to 200,000, we’re looking at three percent of the population. And, even if he lowered that income threshold to households making 100,000 or more, which doesn’t seem likely at present, AVOCADO’s estimate would be pretty close.

If you’re speculating that he’ll raise everyone’s taxes after he’s re-elected, I guess we’ll see, but that’s no easy feat.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 16:30:54

Unfortunately, raising taxes on the wealthy will just cause the wealthy to pass the increase on down to the little guy. If ExxonMobil wants to make $34 billion in profit, it will make $34 billion in profit. If you raise taxes by a billion, Exxon Mobil will simply raise their gas prices to recoup that $1 billion from the little guys. Hence maintaining their $34 billion in profit.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-07-15 18:19:20

“If ExxonMobil wants to make $34 billion in profit, it will make $34 billion in profit.”

If they can so easily choose to make whatever profit they “want to make”, why are they choosing to earn only $34B instead of $100B, $200B, $1T, etc of profits?

Ergo, they do not have the monopoly pricing-power that you suggest.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 06:51:28

Manufacturing Gauge Slumps as Core Inflation Gains
15 Jul 2011 | By: Reuters

U.S. consumer prices fell slightly more than expected in June to post their biggest drop in a year on weak gasoline costs, but underlying inflation pressures remain elevated.

The Consumer Price Index fell 0.2 percent, the Labor Department said on Friday, the largest drop since June 2010, after rising 0.2 percent in May. Economists had expected prices to fall 0.1 percent.

But stripping out food and energy, core CPI rose 0.3 percent after a similar gain in May and above economists’ expectations for a 0.2 percent increase.

“We are getting a very, very sharp rebound in core inflation and much more than the Fed had bargained for. We will be at price stability and possibly through it before the end of this year,” said Eric Green, chief economist at TD Securities in New York.

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-15 07:33:05

Sweet! I can use my newly-affordable i-Pad to apply for food stamps online.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-15 10:52:46

lol

 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:34:47

I’m confused. Are they going to do QE3 or not? I thought Bernake said no.

Comment by NJGuy
2011-07-15 15:29:37

Benny said he would do it if economic contitions got a lot worse. Funny thing was, he did not get specific on which conditions would be the trigger.

 
 
 
2011-07-15 06:56:17

Well, I’m off for more adventures around the globe.

Destination: Philippines.

Hold the fort down while I’m gone. :)

Comment by palmetto
2011-07-15 11:10:38

You’ll have to tone down your fabulousness a tad to make sure you don’t get abducted. And don’t attend any “friendly family gatherings”, especially one where more than one brother is in attendance.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-15 11:48:17

ah you have a rent controlled apartment on the upper west side, now i see how you can afford to be a world food guru

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 15:39:04

“Destination: Philippines.”

Have some lechon for me!

 
Comment by NJGuy
2011-07-15 18:30:46

Try the duck eggs with a touch of salt…Mmmmm.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-07-15 23:30:18

Munch well, darling.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 07:05:26

Nice to see oil heading back toward $100.00

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 07:25:25

Are Bank Examiners to Blame for Slow Job Growth?
The New York Times -SIMON JOHNSON- July 14, 2011

Simon Johnson, the former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, is the co-author of “13 Bankers.”

With unemployment back up to 9.2 percent, as reported last week, the hunt is on for an explanation of why job creation has been so slow since the financial crisis of 2008. Some House Republicans think they have found a specific culprit: bank examiners.

In the view of Representative Bill Posey of Florida and some colleagues on the House Financial Services Committee, bank examiners are clamping down on otherwise perfectly healthy banks - and forcing them, inappropriately, to classify some loans as “non-accrual” (meaning less likely to be paid back).

Mr. Posey has therefore introduced a bill that would direct examiners to regard all loans as “accrual,” as long as payments are still being made - and a hearing was held on July 8 to discuss the merits of the matter.

I testified at the hearing and was not supportive of the bill. On the subsequent panel of witnesses, representatives of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the relevant regulators, testified even more forcefully against the proposal.

George French, on behalf of the F.D.I.C., said in written testimony, “This proposed legislation would result in an understatement of problem loans on banks’ balance sheets and an overstatement of regulatory capital.”

The big issue is “regulatory forbearance” - whether regulators should look the other way when banks get into trouble, allowing them to be nicer to their borrowers and, in the optimists’ view, manage their way to recovery.The problem with such forbearance is that it has a long history of leading to much bigger problems. The savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s began as a relatively small problem at some Texas mortgage lenders.

Congress responded to the complaints of these institutions, which asserted that they had been poorly treated by various changes in rules, and the result was legislation that gave these savings and loans enough additional rope (and forbearance) to hang themselves.

In the end, a significant number of people went to jail and taxpayers had to pay nearly $150 billion to clean up the mess. (Recommended summer reading for all members of Congress and everyone else: “The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is to Own One: How Corporate Executives and Politicians Looted the S&L Industry,” by William K. Black.)

The core problem today is that while community banks were not the main driving force behind the financial boom and bust, in some states they made some very bad decisions. Among the members of Congress who spoke on Friday, I heard strong voices from Florida, as well as from New Mexico and Georgia. In all of these places, thinly capitalized community banks made very bad bets on real estate, often commercial real estate.

The regulators made it very clear in their testimony that the rules have not changed, and they continue to apply the same accounting principles as before. The principles are straightforward and reasonable: a loan cannot be classified as accrual if you do not expect it to be repaid in full.

Allowing banks to classify failing loans as accrual will overstate their financial results and make it look as though they have more capital — that is, greater shareholder equity — than they do. The problem is that some community banks do not have big enough loss-absorbing buffers — the role that bank equity plays.

If we had any kind of free market in banking, you would expect banks to have equity funding of at least 30 percent of total assets. But since the advent of deposit insurance in the 1930s, retail banks have been happy to have much less equity relative to debt, because the government is, in effect, providing a subsidy to debt.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-07-15 08:12:17

“The regulators made it very clear in their testimony that the rules have not changed, and they continue to apply the same accounting principles as before.”

I suppose that’s one way for the bankstas to throw the heat off, blame the regulators. So many voices right now, some calling for new regs and others calling for fewer regs. Meanwhile those trying to enfore existing regs are cast as scapegoats?

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:36:33

Yes, it must be bank examiners, since it has nothing to do with offshoring and we don’t need tariffs or taxes for offshoring.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 07:33:13

Debt is the slavery of the free -Publilius Syrus, Sententiae, c 50 BC

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-15 09:31:11

Debt is slavery.

Blue Skye c 1950 AD

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-15 15:42:24

Slavery rules.

Wall Street c 2011 AD

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 07:38:28

July Consumer Sentiment Worst Since March 2009- Reuters

Consumer sentiment deteriorated in early July to the lowest level since March 2009 on increasing pessimism over falling income and rising unemployment, a survey released on Friday showed.

Comment by butters
2011-07-15 14:50:36

Still no effect on stocks……

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-15 15:07:24

Hey! Up and to the right. Are you with us, or against us?

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 07:42:21

So long U.S.A. hello Mexico…

Fostoria plant closing after 24 years

FOSTORIA, Ohio (WTVG) — More than one hundred employees at InterMetro Industies in Fostoria are dealing with the cold reality that their jobs are heading out of the country. The plant has been a part of Fostoria for 24 years, but that’s about to change.

“I’m single with two kids so I cried.” said Kristina Loar who has been an employee at the plant for nearly seven years.

Dave Morlack, also an employee for seven years has experienced this before. “My other job got sent to Mexico. It’s getting harder and harder to find jobs in this area.” he said.

The company makes storage equipment for food service, health care and commercial product industries. During the next two years the one hundred and eight jobs at the Fostoria plant will be transferred to a new plant in Mexico.

“what else is going to be left here? Everything is you know made in the USA. It’s US, US but everything is leaving the US. ” said Loar.

Their sign says “we put space to work” but the Mayor of Fostoria isn’t too happy where that work is going. “the company doesn’t care about the American workers all they care about is the American dollar. They’ll send a plant down to Mexico and make an inferior product.” said Mayor John Davoli.

In a statement InterMetro Industries Corporation told 13abc, “This difficult decision is no reflection on the employees at this facility, who have served the company well. These changes are necessary to keep InterMetro competitive in a challenging global market for its products.”

But it’s hard for these employees to continue to dedicate themselves to their job knowing in a few months it’ll be gone.

“people are having a hard time coming to work and when they are here it’s why you know - meh.” said Loar.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-15 07:57:30

Voices of the long-term unemployed.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/down-not-voices-long-term-unemployed-125453267.html

Does D.C. (and I don’t just mean the politicians) even have a clue?

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-15 08:08:54

Does D.C. (and I don’t just mean the politicians) even have a clue?

Seems all they care about is keeping housing unaffordable.

Comment by measton
2011-07-15 08:19:18

nope they only care about keeping banks solvent and allowing elite to exit before the collapse.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-15 11:57:31

NO NO NO NOT MY metro shelving units……..I been using them forever

I store my records on them my tv dj equipment even have a 6foot x 18″ chrome shelving on top of my computer desk….NO NONO..

I use the NSF safe freezer ones for my records, they can hold hundreds of pound per shelf….these are my friends they are wonderful in a NYC apartment….oh please

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-07-15 12:09:23

I’m still amazed that one of these guys doesn’t find the CEO and or board members (busy outsourcing their own workers) who outsourced his job and just do at little extraordinary rendition of his own followed by water boarding. These P & L terrorists deserve nothing but the finest moistened imported alpaca chamois though.

 
Comment by NJGuy
2011-07-15 18:34:58

The joke will be on the Mexicans when their jobs get sent to China/Vietnam/Cambodia!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 08:18:56

“The Treasury security is viewed as the safest and most liquid security in the world, and the notion it would become suddenly unreliable and illiquid would throw shock waves through the entire global financial system,”

~ The Bernank

Comment by butters
2011-07-15 10:40:32

Same language was used by many during the bailout in 2008.

History repeats and rhymes.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-07-15 09:47:28

The Green Acres Bubble?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Down-on-the-farm-investors-apf-2437798760.html?x=0

Interesting story, shows where some of that loose money flows (no, not job creation - running up ag land). My fiance’s dad is a farmer, I’ll have to ask him what he sees at the auctions.

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 09:58:48

“I never thought prices would get this high,” says Robert Huber, 73, who just sold his 500-acre corn and soybean farm in Carmel, Ind., for $3.8 million, or $7,600 an acre, triple what he paid for it a decade ago. “At the price we got, it’s going to take a long time for him to pay it off — and that’s if crop prices stay high.”

Comment by Insurance Guy
2011-07-15 10:33:39

There was a similar bubble in farm land prices in the late 1970’s. It popped with the grain embargo fo the Soviet Union. I lived through auction after auction as neighbors went under. It gave me a good education to spot a bubble. Serve me well during the housing bubble.

It is repeating itself. This time things are different with corn being converted to gas, nations that were once poor can now afford american agricultural goods, land always goes up, this is your last chance, et al.

The financing comes from the Federal Land Bank. So it is the Fed’s allowing the price to go up by financing it.

It is a repeating story. We all know the ending.

Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-07-15 18:34:20

A real jerk I know has 160 acres of farmland he co-owns with his twin brother. He kept bragging about it over the years. It is the only successful RE he has. He also has two condos in Biscayne Bay. He does not talk much about those. Nor does he talk much about his house he was building in Jamaica. Last I heard, he was trying to sell it before it was completed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-16 10:05:45

A real jerk I know has 160 acres of farmland he co-owns with his twin brother. He kept bragging about it over the years. bill in Phoenix and Tampa

Braggarts suck don’t they?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-15 12:40:44

Fiancee? I thought she was a GF. Did you get a promotion?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 10:26:47

55% Oppose Tax Hike In Debt Ceiling Deal

As the Beltway politicians try to figure out how they will raise the debt ceiling and for how long, most voters oppose including tax hikes in the deal.

Just 34% think a tax hike should be included in any legislation to raise the debt ceiling. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 55% disagree and say it should not.

There is a huge partisan divide on the question. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Democrats want a tax hike in the deal while 82% of Republicans do not. Among those not affiliated with either major political party, 35% favor a tax hike and 51% are opposed.

Americans who earn more than $75,000 a year are evenly divided as to whether a tax hike should be included in the debt ceiling deal. Those who earn less are opposed to including tax hikes.

Voters remain very concerned about the debt ceiling issue. Sixty-nine percent (69%) believe that it would be bad for the economy if a failure to raise the debt ceiling led to government defaults. Only 6% believe it would be good for theeconomy. Fourteen percent (14%) believe it would have no impact and 11% are notsure. These figures are little changed from a few weeks ago.

At the same time, however, 52% believe it would beeven more dangerous to raise the debt ceiling without making significant cuts in government spending. Thirty-seven percent (37%) take the opposite view and believe a government default would be more dangerous.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-15 14:24:32

“Americans who earn more than $75,000 a year are evenly divided as to whether a tax hike should be included in the debt ceiling deal. Those who earn less are opposed to including tax hikes.

Why is this? Hopes for a trickle down?

 
Comment by Pete
2011-07-15 21:59:38

“Americans who earn more than $75,000 a year are evenly divided as to whether a tax hike should be included in the debt ceiling deal. Those who earn less are opposed to including tax hikes.”

The survey questions, while not included in the article, were given a link by Rasmussen.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/questions/pt_survey_questions/july_2011/questions_debt_ceiling_july_12_13_2011

Only question 2 mentions taxes, and only as it pertains to the debt ceiling, not in conjunction with spending cuts. The way those questions are phrased, it’s no wonder the results came out the way they did. Hell, even question 5, which mentions spending cuts, doesn’t mention taxes. This was an oddly conducted poll, given what we know about the complexity of the situation, and it’s an odd one to cite.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 11:18:27

Obama Singles Out Drug Companies for Savings
July 15 (Bloomberg)

Drug companies may be targets for Medicare spending cuts as U.S. lawmakers push to reach an agreement on a deficit plan ahead of an Aug. 2 deadline, President Barack Obama said.

“The drug companies, for example, are still doing very well through the Medicare program,” Obama said today at a news conference. “Although we have made drugs more available at a cheaper price to seniors who are in Medicare through the Affordable Care Act, there’s more work to potentially be done there,” he said in referring to the 2010 health-care overhaul.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the drug industry’s Washington lobbying group, didn’t immediately respond.

Cuts to drugmakers weren’t among as much as $353 billion in Medicare and Medicaid cuts on a list produced by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican. Medicare is the U.S. health insurance program for the elderly and disabled, and Medicaid is the federal-state health plan covering the poor.

Drug companies were targeted in Obama’s proposal this year that called for $200 billion in U.S. budget savings in a decade from the industry. Spending on drugs in Medicare totaled $55 billion in 2009, about 11 percent of the program’s total spending that year, according to the U.S Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-15 12:55:14

“The drug companies, for example, are still doing very well through the Medicare program,” Obama said today at a news conference.

They sure are! Especially since the government can’t negotiate with them for lower prices. (Thank you, GWB, for Medicare Part D.)

 
Comment by polly
2011-07-15 13:23:44

Wow. Are they actually going to allow Medicare to negotiate for lower drug prices? And the companies worked/lobbied so hard to get out of that in the Medicare D program.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 13:21:11

Overall, if their numbers are right, I think this is a positive article:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/43609261

But I’m still trying to wrap my head around the following statement from the article:

“Twice as many Americans are saving more money today than they did before the recession, according to a survey conducted by America’s Research Group for CNBC.com.”

Huh?

Comment by michael
2011-07-15 14:03:44

are they saving half as much?

 
Comment by Max Power
2011-07-15 15:01:52

Sounds good. But yeah, twice as many as what? So before the recession 25% of people were saving more money than they were before the recession, but after the recession 50% are saving more money than they were before the recession! That’s great!

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-15 16:00:44

Twice as many as what? is the right question.

Before the recession 25% of the people were saving more money than they were before the recession….

I think we need Doc Brown and his DeLorean to sort this one out…

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 13:26:57

You know damn well unions did not expect him to get Ram tough on their people.

U.S. News
Chicago mayor announces 625 layoffs July 15, 2011

CHICAGO, July 15 (UPI) — Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Friday 625 city employees will be laid off in an effort to close Chicago’s $30 million budget gap.

“It has been two weeks and despite ongoing talks, none of the changes have been addressed or agreed upon,” Emanuel said of the time he has given unions to close the budget hole, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Among those affected will be custodians, Water Department call-center operators and seasonal Transportation Department workers, the newspaper said.

Emanuel said he will do what it takes to close the entire budget gap created when a deal with City Hall labor unions for unpaid days off expired. He also asked unions for more concessions and introduced work rule changes, including the suggestion paid holidays be reduced from 12 to nine.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 13:30:36

This one is a TB (True-Buffoon) when you got nothing, play the thread bare race card…

Jackson Lee: Congress complicating debt ceiling because Obama is black
By Josiah Ryan - 07/15/11 The Hill

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) on Friday strongly suggested that members of Congress are making it difficult for President Obama to raise the debt ceiling because of his race.

“I do not understand what I think is the maligning and maliciousness [toward] this president,” said Jackson Lee, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus. “Why is he different? And in my community, that is the question that we raise. In the minority community that is question that is being raised. Why is this president being treated so disrespectfully? Why has the debt limit been raised 60 times? Why did the leader of the Senate continually talk about his job is to bring the president down to make sure he is unelected?”

Earlier in her speech, Jackson Lee said Obama has been targeted unlike any other president.

“I am particularly sensitive to the fact that only this president — only this one, only this one — has received the kind of attacks and disagreement and inability to work, only this one,” said Jackson Lee from the House floor.

“Read between the lines,” she continued. “What is different about this president that should put him in a position that he should not receive the same kind of respectful treatment of when it is necessary to raise the debt limit in order to pay our bills, something required by both statute and the 14th amendment?”

Jackson Lee concluded by saying that she hoped someone would step up and say that what appears obvious to her is not in fact true.

“I hope someone will say that what it appears to be is not in fact accurate,” said Lee. “But historically it seems to be nothing more.”

Comment by butters
2011-07-15 13:55:35

I do not suspect the race. The repubs would have done the same to any Dem president but not to their own. I am very suspectful of the repubs’ motives but since I tend to agree with end result I am supportive of them on this issue.

Obama can change this in his favor in a dime. Just tell the republicans that he will not sign any bill unless he sees a 10% reduction in defense. That should be the end of it. Repubs love their war machine just a little more……

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-16 10:09:26

I do not suspect the race.

I think it has something to do with it. I read a lot of comments from other blogs.

 
 
Comment by NJGuy
2011-07-15 18:40:35

Interesting, this woman has the name of two Confederate Generals in her name!

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-15 14:56:02

Newt, she’s headed for the rhubarb!

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-15 15:27:17

OMG! Screw the country and it’s stupid debt ceiling this is what matters…

Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony Split |PEOPLE

After seven years of marriage, it’s over for Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony.

“We have decided to end our marriage,” they tell PEOPLE exclusively in a joint statement. “This was a very difficult decision. We have come to an amicable conclusion on all matters.”

“It is a painful time for all involved,” the statement continues, “and we appreciate the respect of our privacy at this time.”

Comment by wolfgirl
2011-07-15 18:52:23

I will give them all the privacy they want. I will read no articles about them and buy no magazines with them in it and attend no movie she’s in. Don’t know or care who he is. Now if everyone else would do the same, they would never have to worry about lack of privacy again.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 16:02:56

Forgive me HBB’ers, for I have sinned.

I went to IKEA today and bought stuff.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-15 16:36:57

I’ll forgive you for buying stuff, but sorry, the IKEA pushed you over.

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-15 18:53:20

Hit or miss. Some of their stuff is a’ight.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-07-15 16:15:56

On Thursday, two Republican candidates for President signed the “Marriage Vow” pledge issued by Iowa’s Bob Vander Plaats and the Family Leader. In response, dark horse GOP (non-Establishment) Presidential candidate Gary Johnson stated:

“Government should not be involved in the bedrooms of consenting adults. As a Republican, I am an advocate of liberty and the elimination of unnecessary government intervention into our lives.

“This pledge is offensive to those principles, and as far as I am concerned, it is un-Republican and un-American.”

To which Sammy says, Amen!

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-07-15 16:23:37

http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=718

VIPR Searches and the American Citizen: ‘Dominate. Intimidate. Control.’

“They’re trying to scare the pants off the American people that we need these things… Fear is a commodity and they’re selling it. The more they can sell it, the more we buy into it. When American people are afraid, they will accept anything.”–Kate Hanni, passengers’ rights advocate

“Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government…Among deprivations of rights, none is so effective in cowing a population, crushing the spirit of the individual and putting terror in every heart.”– Justice Robert Jackson, chief U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post