July 19, 2011

Bits Bucket for July 19, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

391 Comments »

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 02:56:02

AP Exclusive: Mortgage ‘robo-signing’ goes on
AP Exclusive: ‘Robo-signing,’ at center of foreclosure probe last year, is still rampant

Mortgage industry employees are still signing documents they haven’t read and using fake signatures more than eight months after big banks and mortgage companies promised to stop the illegal practices that led to a nationwide halt of home foreclosures.

County officials in at least three states say they have received thousands of mortgage documents with questionable signatures since last fall, suggesting that the practices, known collectively as “robo-signing,” remain widespread in the industry.

The documents have come from several companies that process mortgage paperwork, and have been filed on behalf of several major banks. One name, “Linda Green,” was signed almost two dozen different ways.

Lenders say they are working with regulators to fix the problem but cannot explain why it has persisted.

Last fall, the nation’s largest banks and mortgage lenders, including JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and an arm of Goldman Sachs, suspended foreclosures while they investigated how corners were cut to keep pace with the crush of foreclosure paperwork.

Critics say the new findings point to a systemic problem with the paperwork involved in home mortgages and titles. And they say it shows that banks and mortgage processors haven’t acted aggressively enough to put an end to widespread document fraud in the mortgage industry.

“Robo-signing is not even close to over,” says Curtis Hertel, the recorder of deeds in Ingham County, Mich., which includes Lansing. “It’s still an epidemic.”

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 05:33:48

“Robo-signing is not even close to over,” says Curtis Hertel, the recorder of deeds in Ingham County, Mich., which includes Lansing. “It’s still an epidemic.”

Those ‘robots’ keep signing, because none of the higher-ups want to sign the fraudulent papers.

Isn’t the phrase ‘robo-signing’ an interesting and revealing euphemism? Is that what the MSM thinks of lower-level workers? That they’re robots? It also implies some sort of automation, with the idea that it’s more of an accident of too much work, rather than a well-thought-out fraudulent activity.

Why don’t they just call it what it is: Fraudulent bankster foreclosure filings.

If they need something catchier but still accurate, how about ‘fraud-filings’.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 05:56:43

“It also implies some sort of automation, with the idea that it’s more of an accident of too much work, rather than a well-thought-out fraudulent activity.”

It’s the newfangled version of ‘computer error.’

As any of us who know even a little bit about computers realize, 99.999999999%+ of computer error is due to bad programming.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 10:48:40

“Neither you nor your customers ever find the last bug.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 05:34:20

Housing starts for June up by 80K to 629K as compared from May.

The million dollar question is why we are building so much when inventory is so high and banks are already fightning issues as mentioned above.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 05:39:15

And where are they doing all this contsruction? Not around here.

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 05:50:19

Apartment construction, a volatile part of the industry, surged 31.8 percent last month. Single-family home construction rose a more modest 9.4 percent. Building permits, a gauge of future construction, increased 2.5 percent.

More homes lead to more jobs. For every home built, three jobs are created for a year and about $90,000 in taxes are generated, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 05:50:32

They are doing some in the outer burbs of the DC area. They are just starting a new mega-development right next to the another recent mega-development. They think people are going to pay upwards of $300K for a “stacked townhome” out in the sticks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 10:50:07

Despite a huge supply of existing homes, including foreclosures and “deed in lieu” listings, there are at least three new starts in our community. There were none on 2010.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 13:32:28

I live in the construction capital of the world (so it seems) and there is very little going on here right now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by wolfgirl
2011-07-19 05:45:29

I don’t suppose they are building smaller, more affordable homes, are they?

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 07:06:09

Probably yes, but “affordable” is a relative term.

It used to be that you could buy a cutie-patootie detached SFH for 2.5 times your income. Now, you have to pay 3.5 times your income for an attached product slap-up with no yard and an ever-increasing HOA. Technically you can afford it, but your quality of life quietly decreases as you spend a higher % of your income on housing (and gas and bread and e-).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 08:10:01

you could buy a cutie-patootie detached SFH for 2.5 times your income. Now, you have to pay 3.5 times

But isn’t the monthly payment and the total money spent after 30 years about the same (or less) because of today’s rock bottom interest rates compared to back in the day?

 
Comment by whyoung
2011-07-19 09:07:27

“But isn’t the monthly payment and the total money spent after 30 years about the same (or less) because of today’s rock bottom interest rates compared to back in the day?”

Perhaps, but I heard this used as the rationalization by friends who bought three years ago and are now unable to relocate (due to being underwater) and facing increases in property taxes and commuting costs that are becoming a real budget buster.

I’m not sure how many are rooted enough and financially secure enough to stay in one place for 30 years… While it was common in my parents generation, I don’t know anyone in mine who is anywhere close to having a mortgage burning party.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 09:20:46

I heard this used as the rationalization by friends who bought three years ago and are now unable to relocate (due to being underwater) and facing increases in property taxes and commuting costs that are becoming a real budget buster.

Today, I would guess that one could buy a house for a fair/safe price in about 50% of America.

In two more years I would say in about 90% of America.

Thoughts?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 11:03:36

Today, I would guess that one could buy a house for a fair/safe price in about 50% of America.

Problem is that it’s the 50% of America where $10/hr is a “high paying job”

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 05:57:51

It’s all good: Housing construction is up, and there are also 6m+ future foreclosures in shadow inventory to come back on the market over the next decade or so. Any year now, a buyer’s market will materialize!

 
Comment by Kim
2011-07-19 06:42:54

“The million dollar question is why we are building so much when inventory is so high and banks are already fightning issues as mentioned above.”

I can’t speak for all areas, but when I checked the local stats a month or so ago, we could buy existing for $147/sf or build for $150/sf. Arguably those prices are still ridiculously high. However - if I was determined to buy NOW - for $3/sf I’d rather go new (and get exactly what I want) rather than messing with someone else’s 100 amp electric, 40 year-old tyvex, and worn-out carpet and paint choices.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-19 08:39:45

Two things I can think of:

1. Apartment values are driving apartment construction, as fueled by expectations of rent growth AND ridiculously cheap debt as provided by Fannie/Freddie (heard this story before?); and

2. Housing supply is not universal. Some markets have very high vacancy rates (low to mid teens). Other markets have relatively low/stable vacancy rates (mid single-digits). It is highly likely that the development is occurring in markets/states where the vacancy rates are on the lower end.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 05:54:55

“Mortgage industry employees are still signing documents they haven’t read and using fake signatures more than eight months after big banks and mortgage companies promised to stop the illegal practices that led to a nationwide halt of home foreclosures.”

No surprises — a natural consequence of allowing an entire industry to operate above the rule of law.

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-19 05:57:06

How is this any different from the rubber stamps used by secretaries for decades to sign their bosses’ names?

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-19 06:13:57

Legal documents, not interoffice memos.

Comment by Big V
2011-07-19 07:30:49

Rubber stamps have been used on legal documents for a long time. It’s OK if the person using the stamp is an authorized stamper.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-19 13:37:49

I think in these cases, the document being signed is an affadavit that they have reviewed the file and/or that they have standing to foreclose. The document itself is fraudulent because nobody is reviewing the files and, in some cases, they are foreclosing on people that are not in default. The process calls into question all of the documents being robo-signed.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 23:50:17

“The document itself is fraudulent because nobody is reviewing the files and, in some cases, they are foreclosing on people that are not in default.”

Good question, Big V, and thanks to Happy2bHeard for an excellent answer.

 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 06:28:57

Could they sign an affidavit with a rubber-stamped signature of a fake name?

Comment by Jojo
2011-07-19 07:44:54

They could if they didn’t get caught.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:26:43

It’s specifically not legal.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:11:14

“Robo-signing is not even close to over,” says Curtis Hertel, the recorder of deeds in Ingham County, Mich., which includes Lansing. “It’s still an epidemic.”

If Ingham County is anything like this county, it has a County Attorney’s office. Here in Pima County, it’s headed by Barbara Lawall, who isn’t much taller than I am. But, trust me, she’s a force of nature, a doggie with a bone, you get the point.

If I were a county attorney, I’d be all over this robo-signing fraud like white on rice.

And that’s enough cliches for one comment. I yield the rest of my time, Mr. Speaker.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 04:23:29

Realtors Are Liars

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 04:47:28

“and even interfered with Ms. Huen’s ability to earn a living as a realtor,”

More charges in case of domestic slavery

By Mike Raptis,
The Province; With A File From Frank Luba
July 8, 2011

A Vancouver couple who allegedly brought a Filipina nanny into their home, stole her passport and forced her into domestic slavery are facing additional charges following an arraignment hearing Thursday in B.C. Provincial Court.

The couple have now also been charged with employing a foreign national, while Orr faces an additional charge of misrepresentation, after allegedly providing false information in a 2008 application for a temporary work visa for the woman.

Investigators say the couple took the woman’s passport from her and forced her into servitude 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

“This has been a very difficult time for them. They never expected this to happen and the publicity it has attracted has been very stressful . . . and even interfered with Ms. Huen’s ability to earn a living as a realtor,” Preovolos said.

http://www.theprovince.com/news/More+charges+case+domestic+slavery/5070845/story.html - 188k -

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 04:57:30

“They never expected this to happen and the publicity it has attracted has been very stressful” . . .

Wonder if their 24 hour a day slave felt any “stress”? Hope they throw the book at these lowlifes.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 05:15:11

Realtors Are LowLifes

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:28:25

“This has been a very difficult time for them. They never expected this to happen and the publicity it has attracted has been very stressful . . . and even interfered with Ms. Huen’s ability to earn a living as a realtor,” Preovolos said.

She’s going to love prison.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-07-19 22:16:44

Realtors are slavers.

 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 05:24:43

I wrote a contract on a house for investment. The realtor came back saying that the bank wants 99K and my offer was 79K. The house was listed at 120K. I asked the realtor if I can see in writing from the bank about their counter offer. He said there is nothing in writing and neither can I talk to the bank. I just have to trust him. I told him that my offer was in writing and I want any communication fom them also in writing. Nope, that’s not how it works said the realtor.

I told him to return my earnest money and I walked away. So, many realtors are liars.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 05:30:32

Simply demand your written offer be endorsed by the seller. There is no other way.

The fraud game you just described is going on everywhere and has been for a couple years now. A scumbag realtor in Rutland, Vt pulled the same stunt on me.

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-07-19 05:35:04

Reminds me of the scene in “Fargo”: “They said they only want to deal with me. These are very rough people…”

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-19 06:01:45

Kinda funny how they ask you to give earnest money on an offer they have not accepted. Earnest money is usually only deposited after an actual agreement has been made, but before the inspection.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-07-19 06:20:35

My Earnest money check always went with my offer. I wouldn’t accept a verbal response to a written offer. That Realtor should lose their liscense.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 07:03:34

BINGO

 
Comment by Kim
2011-07-19 08:37:03

“My earnest money check always went with my offer.”

We always write up our offers to say the earnest money check is due upon seller acceptance. No sense wasting a check until I am sure the offer is going to lead somewhere.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 10:55:47

Having sold a number of residences over the years I can tell you there was no way we ever would have entertained an offer without an earnest money deposit. The buyers can’t be very earnest if they don’t put up any money.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 11:13:04

Yep, Bill, it really is a good test for how serious a buyer is. I made a few more pennies when the buyers of my house decided to opt out after I accepted their offer.

Trouble is, the sellers have to authorize the release of that money from escrow. So, even though they put up $15k in earnest, I “only” got $8k out of them after negotiations. Otherwise, “negotiations” could have gone on indefinitely.

IMO, if an offer is accepted by the seller, and the buyer backs out after accepting the inspection, the money should automatically be forfeited to the seller.

And I agree with others. If, in the scenario described by Martin, a realtor suggested that “I trust him,” I would have asked for his manager. If he WAS the manager/principal broker, I’d report him immediately to the state RE board…

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 11:42:39

Certified check with an offer puts the seller on the defense. Its really the only way to go and that’s *aggressive*. Know what you’re willing to pay, back it up with cert check, write your contingencies(or waive other items in lieu of an immediate acceptance of offer) and be prepared to walk away from obscene counters.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 11:59:45

sellers have to authorize

Oops, I meant *buyers* have to authorize the release…

 
 
 
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 11:42:45

“nothing in writing” = Run, don’t walk away.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-19 11:58:21

Agree with all the comments. At least in CA, they are required to present your written offer to the seller. Demand that they do so.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 04:51:22

More Shoppers to Delay Their Back-To-School Spending
(Bloomberg)

Retailers will be biting their nails this back-to-school shopping season as consumers are expected to put off purchases until nearly the last minute, according to a new report.

A study by NPD shows consumers will be shopping later, looking for value and searching out lower-priced options.

According to a study of consumer purchasing plans conducted by market researcher NPD Group, the majority of shoppers are planning to spend about the same as they did last year on their back-to-school shopping.

About 40 percent of consumers said they plan to spend the same amount, 38 percent expect to spend less, and 22 percent said they would spend more, NPD said. That’s the same breakdown that occured in last year’s NPD survey.

The study also asked consumers when they would begin their shopping. About 60 percent said they would start by Sept. 1, about 35 percent said they would start by Aug. 1, and the remaining 5 percent said they wouldn’t start until after Sept. 1.

This is an acceleration of the number of consumers who are putting off their shopping until closer to the start of school.

“The consumer is holding on, but it is an indication that consumers remain cautious about their spending,” said Marshal Cohen, chief industry analyst at NPD.

There can be a number of reasons consumers will wait to buy. Sometimes, it is as simple as a child wanting to wait to until they go back to school and see what their friends are wearing.

But other times, it speaks to a need to put off a purchase until money is saved or until it is needed. Some consumers also expect they will get a better deal the longer they wait.

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 06:47:17

Could it have anything to do with the $40K job with benefits that got outsourced and has been replaced by 2 part-time jobs totalling $500/week? Or $4 gas? Or 20% inflation of food prices?

This is what the “recovery-less recovery” looks like.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 08:28:49

“Some consumers also expect they will get a better deal the longer they wait.”

Buy it when you actually need it and it’ll be on sale. I needed shorts at the beginning of summer and they were already on the sale rack, and they were moving in fall/back-to-school clothes. Ridiculous.

Comment by Kim
2011-07-19 08:43:18

“I needed shorts at the beginning of summer and they were already on the sale rack, and they were moving in fall/back-to-school clothes. Ridiculous.”

Hobby Lobby already has several aisles of Christmas merchandise out. Ugg!

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 09:21:25

I used to get crafting catalogs that had Christmas stuff all year round. That was understandable — a Christmas afghan or cross-stitch kit can takes months to complete. But now the craft stores are basically turning into junk stores with pre-made crap from China. Why bother?

(Case in point: in the mid 2000’s there was a strike at the docks in Long Beach so no goods could come in from China. The store the news profiled was AC Moore, a craft store, because they couldn’t get new inventory to the shelves.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 09:23:02

Only 158 Days
12 Hours
36 Minutes

Until Christmas!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by whyoung
2011-07-19 09:11:55

Retailers have trained consumers to wait for sales or discount coupons and are now paying the price.
Except for something “hot and trendy” there is little incentive to buy at full price.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 10:18:09

“Except for something “hot and trendy” there is little incentive to buy at full price.”

And if it’s “hot and trendy”, that’s an incentive not to buy it at all.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by whyoung
2011-07-19 10:34:51

For me and you, but not the wannabees who will spend hundreds on a handbag…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Pete
2011-07-19 15:10:56

“There can be a number of reasons consumers will wait to buy. Sometimes, it is as simple as a child wanting to wait to until they go back to school and see what their friends are wearing”

I always wondered what the economic fallout would be if we mandated school uniforms.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 15:42:14

I always wondered what the economic fallout would be if we mandated school uniforms.

I was such a fashion nerd that it wouldn’t have mattered at all. And, if my father’s workplaces (which were research labs) had mandated uniforms, my mother would have been delighted. Because he’s the one I inherited my fashion nerdiness from.

Comment by Pete
2011-07-19 16:42:12

“I was such a fashion nerd that it wouldn’t have mattered at all. ”

You were not America’s daughter!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-19 18:54:52

What would be the fallout if we mandated everyone speak English and must be able to read the NYTimes out loud to get a HS diploma?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 04:53:35

First it was 5,000 then 10,000 now it’s 11,500…

Cisco Plans to Cut Workforce by 11,500 to Slash Costs
By: Reuters with CNBC.com

Cisco Systems plans to cut its workforce by 11,500 employees as part of its plan to cut annual expenses by $1 billion and revive its business.

Cisco said Monday that it would cut 6,500 employees. Of those, 2,100 employees will take early retirement.

The company also plans to sell its manufacturing facility in Juarez, Mexico, to Foxconn and transfer 5,000 employees to the contract manufacturing company as part of the deal.

Analysts had predicted thousands of job cuts after Cisco said in May that it planned to reorganize the company which has been losing ground in the network equipment business.

The company announced more cuts than some analysts expected.

Comment by polly
2011-07-19 05:18:02

And about 11,000 Borders employees according to the radio this morning. I think I might have to skip the “fire sales” for the final shut down. The one near my office and the the two near my apartment (one really close, one a few miles up the street) are already closed.

Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 05:21:31

IQT Solutions cuts 1200 jobs
U.S. company closes three call centres in Quebec, Ontario

Probably moving them I’m sure to India/China.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2011/07/15/iqt-solutions-layoffs-quebec-ontario.html

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 05:48:34

I’ve pretty much given up hope that any of my kids will ever find non-menial employment.

I actually set foot in a Best Buy on the weekend. The first time in ages. Apparently the “associates” all have college degrees.

So now you need a college degree to be a sales clerk in big box store?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 06:45:04

“given up hope that any of my kids will ever find non-menial employment.”

Hey, they can always be robo-signers!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-07-19 08:43:50

Actually Colorado, you have to have a degree from Stanford like the “Chuck” television show. Life imitating “art”.

 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 08:41:15

I guess Borders was not too big to fail.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:19:52

I know I’ve shared this story sceen-teen times already, but here I go again: Back when I was a wee little Slim at the University of Michigan, I hung out at the original Borders store on State Street. Great place to take a study break and all that.

I’m of the mind that, if Borders had stuck to its original store and made it into a destination store, well, heck, they would have owned the block. And it’s a pretty big block, too.

Well, they got big box fever, and look where it got them. Out of business, that’s where.

Now, to switch gears, there’s a locally owned and operated outdoor store here in Tucson. It’s called the Summit Hut, and it’s been in business for, oh, forty-some years. It has two stores locally, and one heckuva mail order business. I’ve used it for special orders, and I’ve always been super-happy.

If Borders had followed the Summit Hut model with a flagship store on State Street, then maybe another out in one of many
the shopping centers near Ann Arbor, plus an Internet/mail order operation, it would *probably* still be around.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:07:58

I’m not sure that there’s somthing wrong per se with their basic business model. After all, their main competitor, Barnes and Noble isn’t going through bankruptcy. But apparantly they were poorly run and made several bad business mistakes whch left them with too much debt in a time of contraction.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 13:15:34

But apparantly they were poorly run and made several bad business mistakes whch left them with too much debt in a time of contraction.

They were poorly run. Here’s a story from my alma-paper with some juicy details. Key quote:

Keith Taylor, coordinator for the University [of Michigan]’s Undergraduate Creative Writing Program, was an employee at Borders from 1981 to 1989. He worked at the first store brothers Tom and Louis Borders opened on State Street in 1971.

Taylor said the initial Borders store was a unique concept and was very popular.

“The whole idea of a book superstore was brand new,” Taylor said. “In the early ages, Borders was one of the first ones.”

Taylor said he left Borders because he felt uncomfortable with the company’s corporate atmosphere. He said he thinks that starting in 1985, the bookstore began to make poor business choices which ultimately led to the company’s downfall.

“They ruined themselves,” Taylor said. “They made all the wrong decisions.”

Taylor said he feels no sympathy for the store because of its financial troubles.

“It’s a junk store now,” Taylor said. “It doesn’t deserve to live.”

 
Comment by Elanor
2011-07-19 13:34:31

I read today that the Borders brothers sold their company (allegedly to the Kmart Corp!) in the early 90s when it was a 21-store chain. After that, rapid expansion, a failure to jump on the internet sales wagon and lack of an e reader affiliation killed the business.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 13:52:25

Recall that Louis Borders was behind Webvan, one of the biggest money-losers of the dotcom era.

 
Comment by bink
2011-07-19 14:00:39

I read today that the Borders brothers sold their company (allegedly to the Kmart Corp!) in the early 90s when it was a 21-store chain.

You’d really have to try hard to run a business worse than K-Mart/Sears. They’re run worse than American automobile manufacturers.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 14:46:09

re: Webvan

My personal fave was Kosmo. At the time, there was no RedBox or NetFlix. I think it could have survived RedBox (lazy is as lazy does!), but NetFlix streaming would have killed it off eventually anyway.

 
Comment by RedmondJP
2011-07-19 14:50:23

Ahhhh yes, Webvan! At a local thrift store, I purchased refrigerator magnets for both Home Grocer and Webvan, just to remind myself what a collossal marketing fail that purchase was.

Home Grocer spent a wad to successfully build up their marketing and public presence, doing one thing and doing it well and even children knew who the “peach man” was; their trucks were in my neighborhood daily. Then Web Van came along, bought it and killed it, just buried it . . .

I need some bananas and a back scratcher, hey, I’ll just call Webvan (but it’s 2011, so it’s Amazon instead, at least for the back scratcher).

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-19 19:01:45

But I see jobs DAILY here for Fresh Direct, mostly truck drivers with a CDL license or warehouse boxers working in the refrigerated areas, and a few IT jobs.

What kind of skills do you need to load and unload boxes for rich people?

Ar least you have a riding buddy, yes its cheaper to pay 2 people in NYC then to pay all the double parking tickets…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 05:18:14

Cisco keeps hiring in Bangalore and keeps firing people in NC/CA. ALready all their manufacturing is in China and all their IT stuff in Bangalore. Good they have now competition from Juniper.

 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 06:58:05

Foxconn? As in that Foxconn, in Shenzhen? Did Foxconn let Cisco borrow some of their worker-dormitory anti-suicide netting to help with the transition?

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 09:39:48

The bottomless Stockholder Maw demands profit. Okay, so Cisco goes to Foxconn, and makes a ton of profit to feed The Maw. Where is Cisco going to get its profit NEXT year? The Maw waxes nervous when it is not fed.

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 10:04:59

A recent HBB post mentioned ‘The Jungle’ and ‘The Grapes of Wrath.’

The corporatist pigmen will never stop until the the other 99% of us are reduced to living like Jack London’s ‘People of the Abyss.’

It would be karmic retribution if they were dealt a fate like what befell the male protagonist of Theodore Dreiser’s ‘Sister Carrie.’

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:43:40

Little realized fact: every government from your small town to the state level are invested in the stock market in some form or another.

So it’s LITERALLY the local governments that are part of sending your jobs offshore in search of better returns.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 14:50:21

So it’s LITERALLY the local governments

Don’t forget the individual either! I think it’s a Catch-22 that few talk about. We cheer our 401k holdings while we say bye-bye to our jobs.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:18:41

We weren’t given a choice about 401s, or IRA, were we?

But yes, that is all part of the plan.

 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:40:48

Yes, that Foxconn. Which builds about 90% of all PC and server parts. (mobos, graphic cards, NIC cards, chassis, power supplies, monitors, etc)

They in turn, are owned by Hon Hai, which builds 85% of ALL, ALL, world wide consumer electronics.

 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 09:01:57

GOLDMAN to cut 1000 people.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 05:03:45

Here in central S.C. all of our old soda shops are gone. There was nothing like getting to sit on the soda fountain counter stool while the soda-jerk fixed a coke float when I was a kid. Oh well, things change.

Elliston Place Soda Shop Closing After 72 Years

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - A Midtown Nashville mainstay that has been around for more than 70 years will close its doors this weekend. The Elliston Place Soda Shop is slated to serve its last meal on Saturday.

The restaurant has been in business since 1939.

“We’re the oldest, continuous operating restaurant in Nashville, and if it goes away, it’s just going to be a shame,” said manager Janet Melton.

The restaurant has become famous for its nostalgic feel and its milkshakes. The owner blamed a dispute over rent with the building’s landlord for the closing.

Jim Gibbs had no idea the Elliston Place was shutting down when he brought his granddaughters in Monday afternoon.

“There’s not too many soda shops around these days. There’s a lot of ice cream shops, but there’s not too many soda shops in the way I grew up with them. So I thought I’d bring them downtown here and introduce them to Elliston Place,” Gibbs explained.

Melton has worked at the soda shop for the last 17 years.

“It’s very upsetting. I’ve fought tears all day. It’s very upsetting. What are we all going to do? What’s going to happen to the soda shop?” Melton asked out loud.

There is a slight chance the soda shop could move to another location in the area, but Melton said that is a very slight chance.

The best chance to save Elliston Place Soda Shop is if the owner and the landlord can come to an agreement on rent.

“I think it’ll be sad for everybody in Nashville that enjoy old pieces of Nashville history that this isn’t going to be around. It’ll be sad,” Gibbs said.

Five people will lose their jobs when the soda shop closes its doors on Saturday.

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-19 08:00:28

http://www.wyff4.com/r/28592862/detail.html

Chief: Copper Thief Found Dead; 3,000 Lose Power
Explosion, Fire Reported Monday Night

COWPENS, S.C.

Comment by whyoung
2011-07-19 09:15:16

Wow, not bright enough to learn a bit about basic electricity.

I think we have a candidate for a Darwin Award!

http://www.darwinawards.com/

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:45:30

Yes indeedy!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk
2011-07-19 14:59:04

Heh. A friend said years ago there were similar issues around here and the power company switched the neutral line that was being stolen over and over with a hot (energized) line. And they killed their thief.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 15:10:30

After all, the thieves aren’t smart enough to carry one of those little testers that buzzes a warning if the wire is hot.

 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2011-07-19 20:55:52

At least they died doing what they loved.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:21:19

Nothing like using your body to complete a circuit.

BTW, 15 milliamps is enough to kill a human. That’s all.

Comment by Robin
2011-07-19 18:17:28

At what voltage?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-07-20 07:50:46

Whatever voltage it takes to force the 15mA through.

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-19 08:04:08

WMBZ…

The one across from where we lived in Mt pleasant is still there survived Hugo..

http://www.pittstreetpharmacy.com/pittstreethome.html

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 08:25:41

Yea, I’ve been there many times, just feels nice to walk in a place like that.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 08:20:49

Here in central S.C. all of our old soda shops are gone. There was nothing like getting to sit on the soda fountain counter stool while the soda-jerk fixed a coke float when I was a kid.

We had one in our little Illinois town. Red and green rivers, coke, root beer, soda syrup….I remember when they removed the fountain too and went to bottles. We was bummed out but didn’t know why.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 11:08:28

My first summer job was in a drug store. Tobacco counter, lunch counter, wherever they needed me. I made myself some mighty fine chocolate milkshakes back then! Also tried every major cigarette brand over about a month’s time. Decided I liked Lucky Strikes the best but could never stand the taste in my mouth the next morning so I gave them up.

Comment by Pete
2011-07-19 15:47:33

“Decided I liked Lucky Strikes the best but could never stand the taste in my mouth the next morning so I gave them up.”

Yeah, you’re the guy we need at the “stop smoking” meetings–
“Really, it’s no biggie, just focus on how bad your mouth tastes in the morning, you’ll be fine!”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Robin
2011-07-19 18:19:12

Cherry phosphate… MMMMM!

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 05:11:38

Bayou La Batre’s mayor says federal government may close some areas to shrimping. ~ Steve Alexander Reporter

BAYOU LA BATRE, Alabama - Shrimpers in our area are upset about a proposal by the federal government to close shrimping areas and put turtle excluder devices on skimmer boats.

Among those not happy: Bayou la Batre’s mayor.

Shrimpers are hoping for a good season after the oil spill.

But now, Bayou La Batre Mayor Stan Wright said new proposals from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, could cause more problems.

Wright said, “They (NOAA officials) were calling a public hearing today to consider permanently closing some bottoms to shrimping. ”

And, also, putting turtle excluder devices on in-shore skimmers.

Wright said, “All you’re doing is cutting a big hole in your net to let these so-called species out, and you really don’t catch them anyway. Its like putting a hole in your milk bucket when youre trying to milk the cow.”

He said enough is enough.

Wright said, “I dont know what else can be blamed on the commercial fishermen. I guess they’re the ones who killed Jimmy Hoffa.”

Others said don’t blame commercial fishermen for dead sea turtles, because the oil spill prevented them from shrimping last year.

Avery Bates with the Organized Seafood Association of Alabama said, “Something killed the turtles, but I dont think it was boats tied to the dock.”

Shrimper Bill Sessions said, “I think that’s crazy. I don’t think they’re catching enough turtles out here for that.”

Wright is asking commercial fishermen to sign a letter to Senator Richard Shelby asking NOAA to drop the proposals.

He said, “He’s on the committee that funds NOAA. I’m going to ask that he cut their funding.”

Wright is also going one step further.

He said, “I’m asking Shelby to fire everyone of them, or send them to Wal-Mart to work. They want to run immigrants off? Put these people to work in the fields picking watermelons and strawberries.”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 05:50:40

Isn’t most shrimp sold these days farm raised in Asia?

Comment by CharlieTango
2011-07-19 06:10:26

most farm raised shrimp are from asia

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 08:44:53

A lot comes from Central America.

 
 
Comment by CrackerBob
2011-07-19 10:04:25

All of that foreign shrimp is grown in cesspools of feces and anti-biotics; fact! The only good shrimp available is caught wild in the US.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 10:33:54

Where can you buy it? The only shrimp I ever see is imported from Thailand.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-07-19 14:05:32

Thanks for pointing that out…I’ve been telling people for a few years now that since shrimp farming got big I don’t eat them any more at restaurants because they don’t taste good. But if I happen to be on the US coast and get some fresh off the boat they are still good, so I know it’s not just my tastes changing. Now I’m connecting the dots…

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:48:59

It’s getting harder to find on the gulf coast as well.

I’ve given up shrimp for this very reason. :sad:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 05:13:28

POLITICO
David Catanese

Warren will think about Senate race at home

Consumer advocate and liberal heroine Elizabeth Warren did her best to sidestep questions about a potential Massachusetts Senate candidacy Monday.

But a parsing of her words made clear she’s contemplating it.

After standing beside the president during his appointment of Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Warren told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell she would think about waging a challenge to freshman Sen. Scott Brown from her home in Massachusetts.

“Massachusetts does beckon, in that it’s my home,” Warren said when asked about the prospect of a campaign. “I need to do that thinking from home . . . not from Washington.”

With Democratic leaders in Washington unimpressed with the current slate of Democratic candidates, a growing amount of attention has turned to Warren as the sliver-bullet solution.

“Paul Wellstone used to say he could use ten more progressives in the Senate — ‘or one Elizabeth Warren.’ Like Paul Wellstone, Elizabeth Warren is a bold progressive icon. And it’s fitting that she’d be the one to win back Ted Kennedy’s seat from Republican Scott Brown in 2012,” wrote PCCC’s Stephanie Taylor in an e-mail to supporters.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 07:11:50

“I need to do that thinking from home . . . not from Washington.”

…away from the political reporters, I imagine. By the way, the *ahem* liberal blogs are trying to recruit her to run for Senate, even collecting signatures and donations.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:26:08

I know. I’ve been getting the e-mails.

Here’s what I think Warren will do: She’ll go back to Harvard Law, where she has tenure. I’ve heard that she’s quite a good bankruptcy law prof, but you’d better be ready to stand up to her in class. Around Harvard Law, she’s known as Socrates with a Machine Gun.

She’ll get to work on a tell-all tale about her time in Washington. And, unlike such Clinton-era memoirs as Robert Reich’s Locked in the Cabinet, George Stephanopoulos’ All Too Human, and Matthew Latimer’s Bush White House account, Speech-less, it will sell well. Very well.

 
 
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:12:31

I try to see the bright side. It’s GOOD to see somebody go to Washington, do some good, and leave before they are corrupted by the politcal process.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 13:17:20

Once Warren’s outside the Beltway and speaking freely, oh boy-o-boy. A lot of people are going to be very uncomfortable.
Including a certain resident at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Not to mention that top guy in the office across the street. (Tim Geithner, I’m lookin’ right at you.)

Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 18:04:11

Yeah her next book is a must buy, I’ll pick one up at Bord…D’oh!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 23:54:50

Sounds like Geithner may be out of Washington before Warren is?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 05:16:36

Not many houses are coming to the market. In the past 3-4 months I’ve seen only a few townhouses in 5 zip codes that came for selling. It has never been this slow. At least banks should list the houses at whatever price they wish. Our area is the eastern panhandle of WV.

DC metro has houses but the townhouses get snatched by investors even today. They don’t stay more than a 4-5 days in the market and are sold. I tried in Vienna, Fairfax, Ashburn, Reston and Herndon. Not to mention that they are still priced very high as compared to rent you can get. If rent is $1800, price is 450K. Doesn’t make financial sense.

Comment by hobo in mass
2011-07-19 05:25:40

Exact opposite here in my region of the Boston suburbs. We have a ton of inventory. The problem here is that people are still putting up wishing prices. What’s kinda scary is that 1/4 of the places are listed at a loss to the owners and are still 30% higher than recent sales. Decreasing the inventory is going to be slow here.

Comment by Kim
2011-07-19 09:08:22

That about sums up my nabe as well.

Folks can’t afford to sell at market prices, so the true inventory - that which is realistically available to most buyers (those constrained by mortgage-required appraisals, lending restrictions, or good old common sense) - is far smaller than it appears.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 05:51:48

Almost no houses for sale this summer in my nabe. And the few for sale aren’t moving.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 14:11:25

Around here, there are still quite a few places priced way up there in the wish-o-sphere. Needless to say, they’re not selling.

Or they’re busted up and empty, having been abandoned by investors who didn’t get their hoped-for appreciation. Most of these houses have finally been sprung from foreclosure purgatory, and now they’re on the market.

The real adventure, if you’re interested in such things, is figuring out how much they are. These aren’t the places that have info-tubes suspended from the “for sale” signs. Instead, you have to call or text the real estate agent (no thanks) or go to the website, which may or may not have the information.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 06:02:20

Northern Virginia is a different beast from Montgomery County on the other side of the river. In Moco, there are hundreds of townhomes and a few beat-up SFH for sub-$225K. The same beat-up house would be $329K in NoVa.

I think NoVa is in for a dive. 9/11, Iraq, and Afghanistan have been good to NoVa, but that good thing will come to an end. Whoever is investing in those NoVa townhomes is going to take a bath.

Eastern panhandle WVa? That’s quite a commute…

Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 06:43:06

75 miles one way to work. And the high gas prices. Still feel good away from DC traffic and congestion. Here in Easter Panhandle houses are “buy one get one free”.

Comment by MrBubble
2011-07-19 09:53:39

75 miles one way? So that’s 150 miles/day * 1/30 gal/mile * 5 days/week * 4 dollars/gal * 50 weeks/year = $5000 a year in gas?… after taxes? Ouch!

Sorry that you had to travel so far to get out of DC. I lived there for 6 years and that was enough!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 06:56:58

Oxide,
In MoCo, I just looked at North Potomac in the wooton school district, the TH are still in 400Ks. Is this right for that area? What are the zip codes you seeing cheaper THs. I’m looking to get one to rent the top 2 floors and keep the basement room as a backup for me in case I’ve to stay over in case of snow or some other emergency. Also, how much are the rents in the area you mentioned.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 07:25:16

Potomac is the most expensive area in the county, so $400K townhomes aren’t surprising, and they’re probably new and luxury. The cheaper townhomes that I referred to are 70’s-80’s 3/2 with small bedrooms. I recommend looking on Zillow dot com to find for houses for sale, because you can click around the map instead of hunting for zip codes. Look in the 270 corridor: Gaithersburg, Germantown, maybe Rockville. Townhomes like this rent for about $1900, maybe a little less the further you go north you go on 270.

Your rent-and/or-stay option will probably not work. All the townhomes I’ve seen either have a garage in the basement, or a regular basement. They don’t have the English basement-type apartments that you see in inner-city townhomes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 11:18:44

Don’t forget Wheaton and Silver Spring.

My wife and I grew up in, and lived in, the D.C. area most of our lives. Would never go back to live there. Some time after moving here we drove to the D.C. area to attend a funeral. Just about the time we hit the I-85/I-95 merge (south of Richmond) we noticed that we could smell the air. And it didn’t smell good.

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:19:25

Near the Beltway MoCo is cheaper in the East. Far from the Beltway, MoCo is cheaper in the West.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 12:31:03

DC has its problems, but it’s Where the Job Is. Twice I left Maryland for another state, twice things didn’t go well, and twice I had to come back. I don’t want to risk leaving again.

I don’t know what Martin’s commute would look like coming from the Panhandle, and I thought Wheaton and Silver Spring were a little far. Both towns are great to live in… if you want to learn Spanish by immersion.

 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 07:15:01

Oxide,
Also, Maryland is a “Recourse” state. The banks can go after the people defaulting for deficiency. Do you think that could be causing investors to flee from Md and prices are dropping?

I think the prices are still very high. There is a hype for MoCo school system. Except PG county, most Md counties have very good schools and the best are in Baltimore and Clarksville, not in MoCo.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 07:28:59

Yes, prices are very high. They are in line with 120x rents, but that’s because rents are too high as well. Prices aren’t anywhere CLOSE to being in line with incomes. A working class family should be able to live in one of those older townhomes, but they would need a $85K income or so to do it safely. This is the two-income trap that Elizabeth Warren wrote about. You can do it on two lower $40K a year jobs. But if one spouse loses a job, or if you’re single, you’re stuck.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:21:55

Very few buyers have any idea about the difference between recourse and non-recourse. Heck, even the banks don’t seem to make a distinction when setting interest rates. We still have seen very few difficiency judgements.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-19 06:06:36

Weird. Southern Virginia has houses for sale and foreclosures everywhere. They’re like freckles on an Irish girl.

Comment by CA renter
2011-07-19 07:19:51

Here in San Diego (North County Coastal), the market is pretty dead. It was the slowest “spring selling season” I’ve seen in over ten years, based on my personal observations.

OTOH, very little new inventory is coming on the market. The hopeful sellers are probably waiting for the market to come back…next year.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:27:46

Freckles on an Irish girl? I resemble that remark!

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:51:16

Damn Slim. Stop teasing me like this. :lol:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk
2011-07-19 17:42:45

Neighbor? Is that you?

Another Southeastern Virginia person on the HBB?

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 05:24:38

BofA Needs $50 Billion Cushion as Mortgage Expenses Swell
(Source: Bloomberg)

Bank of America Corp. (BAC) may have to build its capital cushion by $50 billion and renege again on Chief Executive Officer Brian T. Moynihan’s pledge to raise the firm’s dividend as mortgage losses drain funds.

Expenses tied to soured home loans may total $20.4 billion in the second quarter, pulling the bank further from capital ratios demanded under new international standards, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based company said June 29. The gap may equal 2.75 percent of risk-weighted assets starting in 2013 — at about $18 billion for each percentage point — crimping Moynihan’s ability to raise dividends and repurchase shares.

“They are likely to be in capital-building mode for longer than previously anticipated,” Jason Goldberg, a Barclays Capital analyst, said in an interview. For now, he said, “I’m hard-pressed to see meaningful capital redeployment.”

Moynihan, 51, has booked about $30 billion in settlements and writedowns to clean up mortgage liabilities at the biggest U.S. bank since succeeding Kenneth D. Lewis last year. As the costs mounted, Bank of America’s stock declined 27 percent this year, the worst showing in the 24-company KBW Bank Index. The company reports second-quarter results tomorrow and has told investors to brace for a loss of as much as $9.1 billion.

“The charges have had the effect of reducing mortgage uncertainty but have pushed dividend increases further into the future,” Richard Staite, an analyst with Atlantic Equities LLC, said in a June 30 note. Staite and Goldberg both estimate that Bank of America needs to raise $50 billion to comply with the new capital requirements, designed to build a buffer against losses and avert a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-19 05:43:32

“BofA Needs $50 Billion Cushion as Mortgage Expenses Swell.”

This headline should serve as a warning to anyone who does business with BofA in that the bank is desperate for money and it will do whatever it takes to get it.

Starve the beast.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 05:53:45

They’re gonna have to be very aggressive, they need $160 from every man, woman and child in the country.

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-19 06:10:18

As long as they enjoy the status of TBTF then they are covered.

This “$160 from every man, woman and child in the country” is very doable via the tax man.

IMO the problem lies with the TBTF status; If a bank, or any other business, is deemed TBTF then it must be protected at all costs because … well, because it’s TBTF.

TBTF should mean it is too big. In a common sense world that just what it would mean. In a common sense world the TBTF status would be yanked away from it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 06:46:27

True, the Fed will just fire up the printing press, lend them the 50 billion @ 0% and they will turn around and buy treasuries.

Its all good. Except at the gas pump and grocery store checkout, but that only affects the little people, so who cares?

 
Comment by pdmseatac
2011-07-19 07:12:34

If the U.S. defaults, will the ongoing bank bailouts continue or will they be cut along with SS, medicare, military, etc. ? At some point, bailing out banks could soak up the entire budget.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 09:37:00

Read carefully. BoA needs to build up its cushion, or it won’t be able to RAISE its dividend to stockholders.

What, they can’t keep the dividend the same, or even decrease it a just little bit? Nope, stockholders can’t have that. They must preserve the profit at all costs.* So BoA will go whining the government that they claim to hate so much. I hope Timmy shows them the door. (yeah right)

————–
*I saw this with the oil companies too. When Congress wanted to tax those profits, an oil lobbyist began to threaten jobs. Instead of give up $80K in profit, they” just cut somebody’s $80K job.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:04:42

“Mortgage Expenses Losses Swell”

Just because a company is named ‘Bank of America,’ does that automatically mean the U.S. taxpayer owes them a living?

Perhaps I should rename our little homestead ‘Household of America’ and see whether we soon grow into too-big-to-fail size…

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-19 06:16:53

I would like to be granted the status of “Too Important to Be Fired” at work, then I would be able to do whatever I want, whenever I want, and with whomever I want.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 06:48:45

At HP I saw the near desperation of worker bees to move into management, knowing that as a manager you are much “safer” than as a worker bee.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 10:31:49

And the pay is much better too, even for first tier managers (it didn’t used to be that way).

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-07-19 14:24:02

I tried to make that leap in the old job and failed totally and completely. It’s looking a lot more doable in the new job if I still want to.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:06:33

“Moynihan, 51, has booked about $30 billion in settlements and writedowns to clean up mortgage liabilities at the biggest U.S. bank since succeeding Kenneth D. Lewis last year.”

What about legal bills related to the robo-signing scandal. Have those cases even been settled yet, much less added to Megabank, Inc’s growing list of ‘expenses’?

Comment by mikeinbend
2011-07-19 17:26:59

Some of this expense surely comes from consolidating their debt servicing from BAC to Bank of America, N.A.

Why would they bother doing that?

It gave them the chance to let their borrowers know that unless disputed; their debts would be considered valid. Fixes Robo-scandal I presume, if borrowers don’t object

Also they let borrowers know who owns the loan (Fannie, in my wifes case) but that BofA, N.A. is named as “creditor”. I did not know creditor and servicer were synonymous!

 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 07:36:02

Looks like Goldman is running out of bailout money and tricks to create scams.

Goldman Sachs stock fell to its lowest level since April 2009 after the bank admitted it had a “disappointing” second quarter.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 05:34:32

If the payment don`t fit you must acquit.

“The evidence will show that we were defrauded,” said Jill Segal.

This is a Remix but I just love a Flock of Segals.

Squatter Nation: 5 years with no mortgage payment
By Les Christie June 12, 2011: 9:23 PM ET

These cases can go on and on. Nationwide, it takes an average of 565 days to foreclose on borrowers in default from their first missed payments to the final auction. In New York, the average is 800 days and in Florida, where the “robo-signing” issue is particularly combative, it’s 807.

If they want to fight evictions hard, borrowers can remain in their homes even longer while their cases are being worked through.

The Segals have been doing that — in court. They bought their home in 2003 with an adjustable rate mortgage. After a few years, their monthly payments tripled to $3,000, just as their home-inspection business was cratering.

The Segals want the bank to modify the mortgage so payments are affordable, and they think the court will agree that their lender put them into a toxic loan.

“The evidence will show that we were defrauded,” said Jill Segal.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/09/real_estate/foreclosure_squatter/index.htm - 62k -

Comment by combotechie
2011-07-19 05:48:06

“The evidence will show we were defrauded.”

The evidence will show you willingly signed mortgage papers that contained an ARM.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 05:52:40

“The evidence will show you willingly signed mortgage papers that contained an ARM.”

Thank you.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 06:40:49

“The evidence will show you willingly signed mortgage papers that contained an ARM.”

It still amazes me that these victim`s stories get printed without any fact checking to see if they are telling the truth. Yes an Adjustable Rate Rider on 5/9/2003, the evidence also shows that Jill and Charles were serial refinancers who stole hundreds of thousands of $ and are now crying foul. Oh, JILL P and SEGAL CHARLES F also own a condo they refied a couple of times but these are only the refis on the 2003 purchase.

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 5/9/2003 11:15:33
Consideration: $225,000.00
Party 1: SEGAL JILL P
SEGAL CHARLES F
Party 2: M I FINANCIAL CORP

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 4/6/2004 08:23:31
Consideration: $100,000.00
Party 1: SEGAL CHARLES F
SEGAL JILL P

Type: MTG
Consideration: $382,500.00
Party 1: SEGAL CHARLES F
SEGAL JILL P

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 6/3/2005 13:47:53
Consideration: $99,000.00
Party 1: SEGAL JILL P
SEGAL CHARLES F

There were satisfactions mixed in but I figure they got about $260k out on this one.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 14:54:49

Oh ho!

Good find.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 05:56:42

“Charles and Jill Segal have not made a mortgage payment in nearly five years — but they continue to live in their five-bedroom West Palm Beach, Fla. home”.

I’ll bet living in a home for free, while not paying a debt you agreed to does not bother them in the least. Things did not go as they planned and now it’s “we were defrauded” say what they will but I am sure they were not held at gun point and forced to sign the mortgage docs.

The $hit hit the fan their house went down in value and they don’t like it. Plus they bought more house than they could afford.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:02:30

Are these the kind of fools Uncle Sam is trying to rescue? I doubt they even vote…

Comment by michael
2011-07-19 07:14:05

“Are these the kind of fools Uncle Sam is trying to rescue?”

yes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 08:47:53

Two more years and it willbe off thier credit report.

Comment by Kim
2011-07-19 09:18:19

Hold off the actual foreclosure for seventeen more months and they will have to pay taxes on the amount of their default. Sweet!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-07-19 09:55:17

I thought the tax code changed under Bush so that FBs would not have any tax liability on debt forgiveness of a mortgage on their primary residence.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:01:26

“The evidence will show that we were defrauded,”

Either that, or that she and hubbie were too giddie about getting into the home that Suzanne researched for them to bother reading or understanding any of that fine print gibberish on their mortgage contract…

 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-19 06:10:03

The evidence will show that you borrowed more money then you could ever repay, using your residence as collateral. Then you stopped making payments for how long again? Was that FIVE YEARS?

What to do, what to do.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 06:28:46

“It’s very hard to save,” said Jill Segal. “Our company’s billing is 90% off and my husband is only working about four days a week.”

So, they still have nominal income. But, if they can’t put away any savings when they have a $0 mortgage payment, then how will they be able to afford a modified mortgage payment, say, $1500?

It’s a done deal that they will lose in court, but what I want to know is if Segals will be penalized for five years of living for free.

My guess (hope?) is that the bank will take the house and forgive them the $180K of mortgage payments they didn’t make. And then the IRS will slap them with a 1099 for about $50K in income taxes.

Comment by wolfgirl
2011-07-19 08:39:28

I’m ok with that.

 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-07-19 05:53:19

Baby sloth yawning: Watch now or never see it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL5mAbwUYpM

It’s soooooooooooooooooo cute.

Comment by michael
2011-07-19 06:16:22

i must admit…that was pretty cute.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 06:49:45

I`m feeling a little sleepy now.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 06:57:03

We’re even cuter when we’re full-grown.

Comment by michael
2011-07-19 07:16:28

friend of mine dressed up like a sloth for halloween once.

he even went to the national zoo to “observe” them beforehand.

he was a pretty eccentric fellow.

Comment by polly
2011-07-19 09:43:17

Naw. Now, if he went to the National Zoo to research naked mole rats for a Halloween costume, you might want to worry.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:28:20

NMR are UGLY, but fascinating on a bunch of different levels.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk
2011-07-19 17:53:15

Heeey youuuu guysss

Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 18:05:31

What about Naomi?

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 06:02:57

United Spiral Pipe warns of 83 layoffs in Pittsburg,
Steel mill could avert layoffs or reduced hours if orders pick up
Contra Costa Times

For the second time this year, employees at United Spiral Pipe in Pittsburg face job cuts or reduced hours due to sluggish orders for the East Bay steel mill.

The company has filed an official notice with state labor officials to cut up to 83 employees out of approximately 100.

That doesn’t mean all these jobs will be lost, though.

“A decision has not been made yet about layoffs,” Michael Connally, manager of human resources with United Spiral Pipe. “There is a potential of layoffs based on business conditions.”

United Spiral makes big steel pipes for the energy and water industries.

In December 2010, the company disclosed it was planning to lay off about 110 employees. But while those employees were able to keep their jobs, they didn’t escape unscathed. The company cut their hours in January from 40 a week to 32, effectively a 20 percent pay cut.

“We didn’t lay off anyone,” Connally said. “But we reduced the hours and kept people.”

Under normal circumstances, wages range from $17 to $26 an hour, company officials said in late 2009 when the plant opened.

The sour economy is the big problem that haunts the steel mill.

“Business has yet to improve,” Connally said. “The entire pipe industry is facing pretty much the same thing.”

At the time United Spiral opened its doors it employed roughly 150 people. The company now has about 100.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 06:33:19

“Steel mill could avert layoffs or reduced hours if orders pick up Obama cuts their taxes.”

Fixed it for you.

:roll:

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 11:27:22

Wow, now THAT’S clueless!

If the company doesn’t make a profit there’s no taxes to be cut.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 12:33:28

Feel the snark…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-07-20 02:41:04

Good one, oxide!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:08:32

There has never been a better time to buy Gold(enman)!

Goldman hits 52-week low

Financial-sector earnings grab Street attention, with Goldman Sachs shares hitting lowest level in a year after missing mark. Bank of America swings to a loss in the quarter, but investors look on bright side.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 11:28:30

It may well be a good time to buy. Do you think Goldman is going to go BK?

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:16:49

In my dreams…

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:12:37

Stick a fork in the gold bubble. Bubbling overconfidence is a key factor in popping every bubble. We saw it in the parabolic phase of the housing bubble circa 2005-2006, and we are there now in the shiny yellow PM.

The nice thing about the popping of this bubble: The pain will be very broadly distributed, as hordes of Asians are long gold.

July 19, 2011, 12:01 a.m. EDT
Gold’s run is almost over
Commentary: Excitement in the gold market has reached fever pitch
By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (MarketWatch) — Brace yourself, gold traders.

Bullion’s extraordinary run is fast running out of steam. Don’t be surprised if gold pulls back in coming sessions.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 06:52:33

It’ll surge once QE3 is announced. Finance ministers around the world will shake their fists in anger, knowing that the USD denominated paper they hold has once again been devauled.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-07-19 08:59:23

Agreed Colorado. How often had we heard that golds bubble is coming to end? All this bubble talk about gold is just a distraction for the real bubble which is in the Internet social media stocks. Who has time to spend on these sites and how many sites can people be on?
BTW, the housing bubble was supported by the left:
Carter’s mandate for banks to make loans in minority communities
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Barney Frank’s protection of them.

By the right: financial deregulation (Bush and Clinton supported) and gutting any police function at the SEC.

By the FED: easy money, not sure if you can call that right or left.

BY the MSM: with the buy now stories.

Gold does not have government support,the fiat currency nations always try to manipulate gold lower and the MSM is constantly trying to claim it is in a bubble. No, what supports gold is the printing presses of most governments. There is no bubble. I will change my mind at about $2400 an Oz inflation adjusted. I am not a permanent bull but I think this run still has legs. Yes, a correction is possible after the recent run but that is just another buying opportunity.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 09:28:36

There are several co-workers here who are Facebook addicts. They measure their worth by how many Friends they have. At one training class, whipped out the iCrap at every break to check Facebook.

These are all men, with advanced college degrees in advanced subjects. it must be far worse for the women.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Elanor
2011-07-19 10:01:17

Grown men possessing advanced degrees who measure their worth by number of Facebook friends? They should audition to be on The Big Bang Theory. Or you could send that idea for a story line to the writers.

BTW, there is a reunion group recently formed on FB that might interest you. Sometime in 2012.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-07-19 10:25:34

Oxide and others, I found an internet link to The Economist story about housing prices in the world and fair value: http://www.economist.com/node/18925999

BTW, when I mentioned that I thought it was the government plan to drive up rents, you asked whether I was suggesting that I was claiming the Government was calling landlords to raise rents. I have never suggested this but I have for a number of years suggested that the government would create general inflation to raise housing prices. This plan would understand that the general inflation would raise rents thus helping to restore a normal rent/own relationship without dropping house prices further. When you add in keeping houses off the market by the big banks it does come down to a plan to raise rents.
I would think that right now the PTB are identifying ways to foreclose on strategic defaulters, quickly. Unlike other people they do have the ability to pay rent if evicted from the homes. The real FBs have to move in with relatives etc and don’t create more demand for rental units.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:30:36

There are several co-workers here who are Facebook addicts. They measure their worth by how many Friends they have.

I feel sorry for those co-workers. Really, I do.

At the same time, if I ever met them, I’d holler “Get a life!” at ‘em!

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 12:35:32

I’d holler Get a Life too, but I can’t talk; I’m an HBB addict.

I don’t have FB.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 13:19:21

I’d holler Get a Life too, but I can’t talk; I’m an HBB addict.

I don’t have FB.

Yipes, you’ve just described me to a tee! I’m also an HBB addict. Without a Facebook page.

Y’know what? When I come to DC to see the sights and visit a client or two, we HBB-ers are going to have to get together for, ahem, an addicts’ support group meeting.

 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 08:56:47

Stick a fork in the gold bubble. Bubbling overconfidence is a key factor in popping every bubble.

That article is about the short term outlook of gold. And gold could drop to about $1200 and still not break its 10 year uptrend line. The 5 year chart of Gold looks pretty orderly and understandable too especially in light of what’s gone down the past 5 years.

http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au1825nyb.html

Comment by 2banana
2011-07-19 09:53:00

Shoeshine boy moment?

A few neighbors and the HVAC man are buying silvers and storing it in their houses in “secret” compartments…

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 12:27:40

Maybe? Silver isn’t as rare as gold and because its cheaper its easier for J6P to buy and hoard.

One thing is certain: If the QEs keep coming, Au and Ag will continue to rise. Once QE stops and interest rates climb … look out below!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 06:14:18

Keller ISD Approves Pay-To-Ride School Bus Program

KELLER,Tx. (CBSDFW.COM) – The Keller ISD school board approved a plan Monday night to make parents pay for students who wish to ride the bus.

Under the plan, parents or guardians will pay $185 a semester for one child to ride the bus and $135 for a second child. Students who get free and reduced lunches will have to pay $100.

“There will be buses,” superintendent James Veitenheimer told parents after initial worries that there wouldn’t be bus service during the school year. “They just won’t be free.”

Students will now carry identification cards that will track if they have paid the fees. There is no monthly payment plan; the fees must be paid up front.

“Had we known there was not going to be an option to get our kids to school we’d have bought a house right next to the school,” said Jennifer Rosenthal, one of the 100 parents who came to the board meeting Monday.

Buses have always been a necessary part of getting to school for the Rosenthal family. Her children travel two miles to Keller Middle School and just over three miles to Bear Creek Intermediate.

But that’s no longer a guaranteed service: Each year Keller spends between $260 and $360 per student on school bus transportation. District officials say when Keller voters rejected a 13-cent increase in the property tax rate they were left to find other ways of generating money.

During the 2010-2011 school year the district provided about 120 school bus routes. During the next school year, there will be just 72 stops. Routes will be released Thursday.

But, there will still be 40 routes for special needs children, which a state mandate.

Comment by pdmseatac
2011-07-19 07:31:29

I used to ride the bus with my sister back in the late 50s, 60s, and early 70s. We had to pay back then, too. What’s the big deal ? We also usually had to walk up to a half-mile or so to the nearest stop. Somehow we survived the ordeal.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 08:51:25

Very few school districts in Texas let you ride the bus if you live within 2 miles of the school.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-19 15:24:58

Interesting. I wonder how many parents will opt to drive their kids to school instead, increasing traffic before and after school.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-19 15:27:35

Ooh, Ooh! I wonder how many will form car pools. And how many will offer to drive their neighbors’ kids for 1/2 the bus fare.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:21:33

I’d agree with this guy, except for one thing:

I can’t foresee any other candidate resisting the lure of ginormous Wall-Street funded financial rewards for abandoning the rest of America’s interests and catering to the top 1% any better than Obama has.

When you get down to it, only the top 1%ers matter anyway, right?

July 19, 2011, 12:01 a.m. EDT
1 reason Obama can lose in 2012
Commentary: President made single, critical mistake with economy

Blame as much of the problem on his predecessor as you like, the fact is Obama hasn’t come up with a solution. In fact, he’s made things worse by filling his top economic posts with banking-friendly interests, status-quo advisers and milquetoast regulators.

And if there’s one reason Obama loses in 2012, it’ll be because he failed to surround himself with people willing to take drastic action to get the economy moving again.

Comment by Rancher
2011-07-19 07:29:43

Bingo. Only 8% of his advisers have any kind of business
background, the rest are academics.

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 07:36:20

“the rest are academics”.

Yes but they are big lofty thinkers! No common sense but that is of little consequence.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 08:54:37

Bush had an MBA from Harvard.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:20:54

Barely. (C student)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 09:36:52

Only 8% of his advisers have any kind of business
background, the rest are academics.

Why is this necessarily a negative? It is not the big “business backgrounders” that have opened our borders, sent our jobs overseas and morphed our economy into a crony-capitalistic kleptocracy?

Who has destroyed our middle-class? The academics or the big business backgrounders?

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:22:16

Both. Unfortunately.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:37:48

Bingo. Only 8% of his advisers have any kind of business
background, the rest are academics.

That’s what bopped me over the head while I was reading, correct me if I’m wrong, Jonathan Alter’s book, The Promise.

And it sums up a lot of my misgivings about the Obama Administration. The fellas (and they are mostly fellas in the key positions) just don’t seem to get what starting and operating businesses truly entails.

For one thing, there are a lot of US business that are what I like to call “evil non-job creators.” Meaning that we’re in business for ourselves, by ourselves. There isn’t a whole lot of government help or encouragement for us.

Is the new Startup American initiative going to help us succeed? Not according to this blogger.

Key point from the link:

So let me try to explain it to the folks that the Startup America Partnership, because I don’t think they get it. Who are we? Many - probably most, Americans with startup companies are struggling in this economy. We don’t get unemployment insurance, if business goes down for us, we just starve. We watched in amazement as people expressed so much sympathy the “99 weekers” - those who have had unemployment insurance for nearly two years who still can’t find work. No one begrudges them this benefit, but it is amazing at how generously the government rewards them generously for losing their corporate jobs, while not caring at all about us.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:30:01

Contrary to popular mythology, this country does everything possible to discourage and penalize the very small business start-ups.

Most of that, at the local level.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:23:47

Bubble naysaying is making a comeback:

James Altucher’s
This is Insane!
July 18, 2011, 3:43 PM ET

Today I opened up a business section of a random newspaper and it said: “We’re heading into a bubble.” This is so far from the truth it doesn’t even make me laugh. It makes me angry. In other words, all talk of bubbles are insane (other than the suggestion I have at the very end of this article).

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 06:33:35

I don’t actually understand why a debt default would automatically lead to higher interest rates; couldn’t the Fed simply pass QE3 and start buying more bonds? If anyone thinks they understand the ‘debt default will lead to higher bond yields’ argument, please explain.

P.S. If the ‘higher rates’ argument is correct, there could be a silver lining to a debt default, in the form of more affordable housing in response to borrowing costs more in line with historical levels.

P.P.S. If Congress voted year-in, year-out to raise the debt ceiling since 1917, is it fair to blame the Fed for inflating away the value of the dollar?

Perhaps the discussion is moot, as I believe the Republicans have realized they stand to lose big time if the debt ceiling is not raised.

July 19, 2011, 12:01 a.m. EDT
Perils of a default
Commentary: Without a debt deal, we will all suffer
By Irwin Kellner, MarketWatch

In most years since the founding of the Republic, spending has exceeded revenues. The result was that the government had to borrow to make up the difference.

Not surprisingly, Washington’s yearly deficits far exceeded whatever surpluses it managed to run on an annual basis, resulting in a growing accumulation of debt.

Even though the Congress was largely responsible for this debt, it decided to limit how much the government could borrow by enacting a debt ceiling back in 1917.

Inevitably the ceiling had to be raised. This provided an opportunity for the party that did not control the White House to criticize the one that did. It was as if the president alone had crafted the budget and was trying to convince a tight-fisted Congress to spend.

Now you would think that, after having raised the debt ceiling nearly 100 times since 1917, the politicians, confronted with the need to raise the ceiling again, would be content to pontificate, score their points against the opposition, and then vote to raise the ceiling.

After all, most of today’s debt outstanding is the result of the actions of past Congresses and administrations — not just simply reflecting the past couple of years. In other words, the government has already spent the money, and now it has to come up with the funds to pay its bills.

But the debate appears to be particularly fierce this time.

Unlike past episodes, a political standoff has developed over such basic issues as the size of government. The two parties have dug in their heels, suggesting the very real possibility that the debt ceiling will not be raised in time to allow the government to borrow enough to meet its obligations.

And while it may have enough funds coming in to pay interest on its debt and even to redeem bonds that come due, at least for a while, the inability of Washington to borrow would shock the financial markets, leading to all sorts of repercussions.

First of all, the nation’s credit rating would be downgraded for the first time in our history. This would cause foreign investors to demand higher interest to buy our bonds, sending rates up across the board and making it more difficult for consumers and business to get loans.

Comment by polly
2011-07-19 08:06:10

Is this one of your “rhetorical” questions, Bear?

If the debt ceiling isn’t raised, it will call into question the ability of the US government to get past partisan politics to pay for the level of government they have already passed in a budget. That doesn’t necessarily mean an actual default on existing debt, but it raises the risk so much that people will want some sort of risk premium to own that debt. In the meantime, lots and lots of financial entities (like insurance companies, pension funds, banks, etc.) hold treasury debt as part of the triple A rated assets they are required to hold as reserves against their obligations. If US debt is downgraded, all those entities will have to use some other triple A rated obligations to fulfill this requirement. This will lead to a vast increase in the amount of treasuries that need to be sold, at the same time as people are nervous about the ability of the government to get access to the money to pay them.

High supply and low demand leads to much lower prices which in bonds translates to higher rates.

For the Fed to jump in and try to correct something that is inherently a political conflict is a very dangerous thing for them to do. I think they would hesitate - a lot - and possibly not do it at all.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 14:47:25

“will have to use some other triple A rated obligations to fulfill this requirement.”

Does gold count as a triple A rated obligation?

 
 
Comment by cactus
2011-07-19 17:58:51

couldn’t the Fed simply pass QE3 and start buying more bonds?”

Does the FED ever plan to sell these bonds back ? If interest rates rise the FED will take a loss on all these bonds it has bought.

Is it possible the FED dosen’t have to worry about making money?

Like if I could just make credit cards for myself and buy anything I want to and never have to work to pay it back? Is that how the FED bank works ?

I don’t see how a Fed bank can do that and not destroy itself and the currency ?

Is that why so many are buying Gold ?

Comment by drumminj
2011-07-19 22:27:52

If interest rates rise the FED will take a loss on all these bonds it has bought.

Only if it doesn’t hold to maturity. What’s to compel the fed to sell?

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 06:38:46

Coca-Cola Earnings Increase 18% as Sales Gain
(Bloomberg)

Coca-Cola Co. the world’s largest soft-drink maker, said second-quarter profit rose 18 percent as sales in Latin America and Asia gained.

Net income advanced to $2.8 billion, or $1.20 a share, from $2.37 billion, or $1.02, a year earlier, the Atlanta-based company said today in a statement. Excluding some items, profit was $1.17 a share, topping the $1.16 average of 14 analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

Chief Executive Officer Muhtar Kent has built new plants in emerging markets and pushed more profitable package sizes overseas to help offset limited U.S. pricing gains this year. Second-quarter net operating revenue climbed 13 percent in Latin America and 15 percent in Coke’s Eurasia and Africa division.

“The surprise is not that international markets grew but the rate at which they grew,” Philip Gorham, a senior equity analyst for Morningstar Inc. in Chicago, said today in an interview. “Coke is investing in distribution in emerging markets and gaining points of sale.”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 06:50:58

When I lived in Mexico soda pop was subsidized via sugar subsidies. I remember when a 750 ml Coke cost 10 US cents. And because of the subsidies the price was fixed by the govenrment, it was illegal to sell it for more than the “official” price.

Comment by butters
2011-07-19 08:26:05

Remove the corn subsidies in US, you will see price go up in everything including coke and pepsi.

Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 08:56:03

Remove the sugar tariffs and you will see it go back down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-07-19 11:36:12

But we need those tariffs to protect and even expand U.S. jobs (in this case farming jobs). Right?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 12:13:33

Funy how sugar beet farmers have more clout than the American middle class.

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:48:49

There are more Senators per voter in the net food producing states than the net food consuming states.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2011-07-19 06:41:50
Comment by CA renter
2011-07-19 07:09:41

Found this from Russ Winter’s site (he used to post here in the early days). It’s related to this, IMHO. Agree with basically everything they stand for, here:

As a broad-based network representing people across the political spectrum, we are working together to reach common ground and fight for pivotal political reforms. As long as the economy and government are rigged in favor of the top economic 0.1%, we will all lose.
Here’s a general outline of our common ground platform:
Enforce RICO Laws
Break Up the Big Banks
End the Fed
Break Up the Mainstream Media
Shut the Revolving Door
End Closed Door Lobbying
Increase Government Transparency
End Corporate Personhood
Amend Campaign Finance
Verify All Votes
Investigate War Profiteers
Investigate War Crimes
End the Wars
Reopen the 9/11 Investigation
Restore Civil Liberties
Uphold the Constitution
Clean Air, Water & Food
Reduce Healthcare Costs, Profiteering
Make Healthcare a Human Right
Improve Education For All, Reduce Costs
Reform Prison System
Reform Drug Laws
Immigration Reform
Rebuild Infrastructure
Protect Internet Freedom
Empower States’ Rights
End Corporate Welfare
Raise Taxes on Richest 0.1%
Reduce Taxes for 99%

http://www.wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/winter/?p=3977

Comment by The_Overdog
2011-07-19 09:01:45

How about a sexy broad for each unsexy guy too, if we’re dreaming!

How do you shut a revolving door? I thought the design of revolving doors was that another door behind the one you are passing through is shut as the one you are in opens.

So wouldn’t you want to stop the revolving door from revolving so quickly rather than just shut it?

Lesson: Don’t outsource your metaphors to Paul Krugman.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:32:27

Even revolving doors have locks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 06:56:07

Video shows enraged Chihuahua attacking robbers

AP – 3 hrs ago

ALTADENA, Calif. (AP) — Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies have released a video of a barking Chihuahua angrily chasing off robbers at an Altadena smoke shop.

The video, released Monday, shows two hooded men, one armed with a rifle, running into the Ace Smoke Shop on July 7 and demanding money.

As the store owner begins putting money in a backpack carried by one of the men, the owner’s Chihuahua begins barking incessantly and jumping at the men, chasing them out of the store and down the street.

At one point, one of the men even points his rifle at the Chihuahua, but the dog is undaunted.

Neither the store owner, nor the dog was injured.

http://news.yahoo.com/video-shows-enraged-chihuahua-attacking-robbers-054806171.html - -

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 07:05:29

Bill to curb California college execs’ pay raises
Nanette Asimov, Chronicle Staff Writer -SF Gate - July 19, 2011

Days after California’s public universities handed lucrative new pay and bonuses to three executives and a chancellor while raising student tuition, a state senator has introduced a bill to make such pay increases illegal in tough economic times.

The bill, filed Monday by state Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, would prohibit executive pay increases at the University of California and California State University in years when the state does not raise its allocation to the schools.

This year, California slashed $650 million from each university system. In response, the UC regents and CSU trustees raised tuition last week, both for the second time in less than a year. CSU tuition is 23 percent higher than it was last fall. UC tuition is 18 percent higher.

At the same time, CSU trustees approved a $400,000 salary for Elliot Hirshman, incoming president of the San Diego campus, that is $100,000 higher than his predecessor. The campus foundation will pay for $50,000 of it.

On Friday, UC regents gave a 24 percent raise to Associate Vice President Santiago Muñoz, from $201,400 to $250,000. Taxpayers pay 40 percent. They approved a 10 percent increase for Vice President Patrick Lenz, from $272,500 to $300,000, all from taxpayer funds. And they gave Mark Laret, who runs the UCSF Medical Center, a $195,300 raise, to $935,000, with a retention bonus of $1 million over four years. His pay is from medical center revenue.

The approvals were appalling, Yee said in a statement. “UC and CSU are public institutions, not Wall Street banks.”

Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a similar bill from Yee in 2009.

Gov. Jerry Brown’s position on the new bill isn’t known, but in a letter last week he urged CSU trustees to reject the new salary for the San Diego president.

Assemblyman Luis Alejo, D-Watsonville, wrote UC President Mark Yudof that the regents’ decision “reveals a shocking misalignment of priorities.”

Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 09:10:11

That’s about what school superintendents get paid in a lit of states. And there is only one president.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-07-19 12:32:05

$400k huh? Guess they felt they had to keep up w/this. These figures are from 2008:

Here are the total compensation packages for presidents of private colleges in Central New York in 2008:
Nancy Cantor, Syracuse University, $1,386,464
David Skorton, Cornell University, $915,913
Rebecca Chopp, Colgate University, $596,369*
Mark Gearan, Hobart & William Smith Colleges, $533,547
Joan Stewart, Hamilton College, $470,028
Lisa Marsh Ryerson, Wells College, $299,142
Fred Pestello, Le Moyne College, $189,895**
Thomas Rochon, Ithaca College, $178,568**
* Left Colgate in 2009
**Started in July 2008
Source: IRS Form 990 reports; Chronicle of Higher Education

 
 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 07:16:17

Some HBB posters can’t seem to post stories unless they’ve been linked off of Drudge, most of which are just non-news sensationalistic right wing garbage that seeks to inflame the allegedly righteous indignation of its readers.

On that note, here’s one you missed, from political hack site the Daily Caller:

Stress-related condition ‘incapacitates’ Bachman; heavy pill use alleged

“She carries and takes all sorts of pills. Prevention pills. Pills during the migraine. Pills after the migraine, to keep them under control. She has to take these pills wherever she goes.”

The stress of “curing” all those homosexuals would probably give me a headache too.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 07:26:01

The Bachman freakshow is getting as good as the Palin freakfest. What nutjobs. lmao.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-07-19 16:41:26

Plus her husband (the ‘cure-your-gayness’ counselor) sure seems gay himself. What a screwed-up marriage they must have.

 
 
Comment by butters
2011-07-19 08:19:15

I guess praying doesn’t cure everything…..

Looks like Romney and Pawlenty are really scared of her…….

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 09:08:08

“Looks like Romney and Pawlenty are really scared of her”…….

She will never be nominated by the GOP, ain’t gonna happen. Mitt is far more likely to get it. He is part on the big money club, loves the un-federal reserve. Dines with the big banksters and w.street, knows how to play their game. All of this is what the GOP loves. Just like the DEMS they worship at the big money alter. The snookered voters will line up and do their duty thinking as always they are going to get more, just like the liars promise. Hook, line and sinker, time and time again. Because… voters are smart!

Comment by polly
2011-07-19 09:40:38

There may be footage of him begging for a bailout for Bain at some time in the past. My parents mentioned an ad. Seems the company got some money and he pocketed a large chunk of it.

Won’t play well in small government circles if it is as bad as described.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 11:03:34

Don’t worry, the media will bury it. McCain was part of the S&L scandal (Keating 5) and that never got any traction. But if there’s video, that might change things.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 09:11:20

JFK took lots of pills for his back pain.

Comment by CrackerBob
2011-07-19 10:14:57

JFK did not have regular conversations with God where God actually spoke back to him. Mrs. Bachman has those conversations. Like RAL says, it is going to be a freakshow.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:41:15

JFK took lots of pills for his back pain.

Indeed he did.

Matter of fact, there was a doctor he used to consult with regularly while he was President. Around the White House, she became known as Dr. Feelgood.

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-19 20:22:00

Slim here is the Gunlocke JFK chair he used in the white house…I have a similar type newer gunlocke chair and I love it….

http://www.newyorkfirst.com/gifts/5109.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-07-19 11:09:51

JFK

Largest tax cut in American history (up to that time)
NRA Life Member
Put America’s strategic interests first
Bombed the crap out of the commies and
A War Hero

Hmmmm…..

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 12:40:01

“Largest tax cut in American history (up to that time)”

You really think you can convince us that in a time of no outsourcing or insourcing, still plenty of jobs that didn’t need a college degree, house prices in line with incomes, and people well-paid because of *the horror* unions, that a tax cut from 90% to 70% is what pushed the middle class into prosperity?

You need to post on board with dumber people.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2011-07-19 14:09:12

My dad was still in the Air Force when Kennedy was president. They were posted in Germany for a year. The village was largely filled with war widows scraping by on next to nothing. Young adult children lived with their mothers, though the youngest children of these women would still have been teenagers. Meat was strictly rationed.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:39:09

We were stationed in GB at the time.

 
 
Comment by Jim A
2011-07-19 12:54:06

Lowered the top marginal income tax rate to what, 70% or so? You wouldn’t get very far arguing for JFKs tax policy, not with 1% ers controlling congress.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars
2011-07-19 17:43:38

Yes JFK knew something about marginal rates. He zero’ed in on a top marginal rate of 70%. Let’s do it again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 07:24:12

Clipped from a NYT article:

An extraordinary amount of personal income is coming directly from the government.

Close to $2 of every $10 that went into Americans’ wallets last year were payments like jobless benefits, food stamps, Social Security and disability, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. In states hit hard by the downturn, like Arizona, Florida, Michigan and Ohio, residents derived even more of their income from the government.

By the end of this year, however, many of those dollars are going to disappear, with the expiration of extended benefits intended to help people cope with the lingering effects of the recession. Moody’s Analytics estimates $37 billion will be drained from the nation’s pocketbooks this year.

In terms of economic impact, that is slightly less than the spending cuts Congress enacted to keep the government financed through September, averting a shutdown.

Unless hiring picks up sharply to compensate, economists fear that the lost income will further crimp consumer spending and act as a drag on a recovery that is still quite fragile. Among the other supports that are slipping away are federal aid to the states, the Federal Reserve’s program to pump money into the economy and the payroll tax cut, scheduled to expire at the end of the year.

In Arizona, where there are 10 job seekers for every opening, 45,000 people could lose benefits by the end of the year, according to estimates from the state Department of Economic Security. Yet employers in the state have added just 4,000 jobs over the last 12 months.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:37:47

But BofA will get its 50B bailout.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:48:08

“In Arizona, where there are 10 job seekers for every opening, 45,000 people could lose benefits by the end of the year”

If this is a recovery, I don’t want to see what a “recession” is like!

(snaps fingers)

I know! Let’s just eliminate minimum wage. That way more people will have jobs (incluing those already employed) that don’t pay enough to live off of, an dthey too can apply for goodstamps, section 8 housing, disability or apply for early (and reduced) social security benefits.

Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 10:26:21

Someone recently mentioned the Earned Income Tax Credit. The ’sweet spot’ at which a single parent of 3 children qualifies for the maximum credit of $5,666 in 2010 is an income between $12,550 and $16,450. The ‘recovery-less recovery’ will be creating many jobs in that income range.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 12:15:08

That’s the ticket! Whe should allow employers to pay nothing and have their workers survive off of welfare!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 12:33:09

Everyone could be an unpaid intern! Why didn’t I think of that before!! Take that, China!

Imagine the profits!! And stocks would shoot through the roof!!

Of course there would be even more tax breaks for Corporate America, so the wouldn’t have to pay income tax on all the money they save by not paying salaries.

You might laugh, but there’s probably a CEO out there saying: Hey, that’s not a bad idea!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:42:30

No “probably” about it. It’s their wet dream.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:41:10

“Unless hiring picks up sharply to compensate, economists fear that the lost income will further crimp consumer spending and act as a drag on a recovery that is still quite fragile. </i.

They’d better fear more than that.

I remember the riots of the 60s. They made the Rodney King riots look like a picnic.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 07:30:48

~MSNBC

SunPower is thinking big — even more so after French oil giant Total S.A. acquired 60 percent of the solar energy firm this spring. The company followed up its recent launch of the most efficient mass-produced solar cell in the world with an announcement that it will soon start construction of the biggest solar roof in North America. SunPower has entered into a contract for a 1.1 million square-foot solar installation atop the Gloucester Marine Terminal in Gloucester, N.J. The company’s primary competitors include First Solar, Suntech Power and China-based Yingli Green Energy Holding Company.

Showcasing SunPower’s capabilities …
The Gloucester Marine Terminal near the Walt Whitman Bridge on the Delaware River is owned by the Holt family. The installation will use 27,528 photovoltaic rooftop solar panels from SunPower, and will have a power generation capacity of 9 megawatts. The electricity generated — sufficient to power 1,500 homes — will account for as much as 80 percent of the power needs of the terminal, a shipping facility that boasts the largest refrigerated capacity of any terminal in the United States.

The $42 million privately funded project is already under way, and will be completed this fall.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 07:33:00

State Street takes 850 IT staff off the payroll
State Street is to sack 530 IT staff and transfer 320 other tech personnel to IBM and Wipro under an enterprise-wide technology
IBM Financial Services

The lay-offs are part of a major cost-cutting programme first announced by the US bank in December last year. The restructuring, which will incur up to $450 million in charges, comes as the company struggles to realise returns in a low interest rate environment.

At the time, the bank said it was prepared to make “sustained investments” in its technology platform, with a view to moving to lower-cost operating models through the development of private processing clouds. The first stage of this ambition was realised in June, when State Street rolled out a private cloud environment to provide clients with access to data and analysis in real time.

In step with these initiatives, the company is expanding its relationships with IBM and Wipro to “support components of its technology infrastructure and application maintenance and support systems”.

State Street says 320 non-client facing IT positions will be transferred to IBM and Wipro, and a further 530 positions will be eliminated over the course of the next 12-18 months. The cuts will come from the bank’s North American operations, removing approximately 20% of its 4000-strong IT workforce off the payroll.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:35:51

When I worked at HP we had a major IT purge as well. These days IT support at HP is self serve. I once had to reimage my laptop soI ordered the CDs and downloaded the 30+ page PDF instructions.

It was a daunting task as the intstructions were often vage and ambiguous. It takes almost a whole day to complete the process. I can only imagine what the process must seem like to non-technical staff. And don’t ask for someone to hold your hand, there isn’t anyone.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:44:39

This is one reason why I will never buy HP again.

Or Dell for that matter.

 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 09:16:16

Wipro is an Indian outsourcing company. Those 350 new employees had better not plan on staying very long.

 
 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 07:34:24

From LulzSec’s twitter feed:

“Arrest us. We dare you. We are the unstoppable hacking generation and you are a wasted old sack of sh*t, Murdoch. ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWER!”

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:31:13

Did these brazen twitterers not hear about what happened to the whistle blower? A gun beats an iPhone any day.

Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 09:20:45

I think they may actually be working for an Agency with guns.

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2011-07-19 08:44:06

As early as 1976, my editor was telling anyone who would listen, that this upstart Aussie would be the biggest threat to American democracy in the last 100 years. Turns out, he was right.

What amazes me is that it’s taken this long for this particular Murdoch scandal to catch and resonate. My Brit friends were saying this one would take down Cameron– if not the Brown government — nearly three years ago when it first hit the media.

From “The Independent” (uk) November 12, 2009. “…They suspect that the Conservative Party has been tailoring its policies on media regulation and the BBC to suit the commercial interests of News International….)

Sound familiar?

But recall that the same British newspaper had reported that the Niger “yellow cake uranium” assertions were a fraud based on an Italian grad student’s paid assessment, a full 8 MONTHS before GWBush “revealed” them in his SOTU address in January and used it a pretext for his ruinous little war in Iraq.

Oh wait, that was when Fox News ruled the airwaves….

It’s a grand day for journalism. May his rotten empire go down in flames.

Comment by CrackerBob
2011-07-19 10:20:27

Well, at least we can depend on the good old Wall Street Journal for real integrity; no..wait, Duh! Murdock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by ahansen
2011-07-19 10:49:53

Yep. That was always his stated intention, and with its acquisition (and long-sought legitimacy,) came his downfall. Almost Shakespearian, when you think about it.

After I posted the above, I realized I’d gotten the Murdoch treatment myself a few years back. Some reporter from The Sun kept calling and calling and finally cobbled together a completely fabricated “exclusive interview” with me from other sources, including quotes I’d never made and events that never occurred. I counted eight egregious errors in the first three paragraphs alone. Then she sold it to the National Enquirer without my permission, and I learned about it when I saw my face stapled next to pix of John Travolta’s dead son while I was waiting in the grocery line at Von’s.

Unlike the London Police, I never saw a pence from it….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Elanor
2011-07-19 13:43:18

It may not be too late to sue them for that egregious exploitation and fabrication. Hit ‘em while they’re down.

 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:44:30

My parents have been readers of the WSJ since I was in utero. And probably before that too.

Any-hoo, on my last visit to the Parental Unit House, I read the WSJ. And I was shocked at how the quality of the writing had deteriorated.

Methinks that the Murdoch buyout served as a “Get Outta Here!” signal the WSJ’s best and brightest. And get out they did.

Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 11:08:58

I wouldn’t bother with Murdoch himself. He’s OLD. I want them to find out who his chosen successor is, and start working on that guy NOW.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:47:26

His son.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-07-19 18:39:35

Saw that today. He’s on the hot seat too. I think this is a good thing.

 
 
Comment by Robin
2011-07-19 22:50:11

Slim- Their editing for grammar is now embarrassingly bad, don’t you think?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-07-19 11:22:21

“Oh wait, that was when Fox News ruled the airwaves….”

I think I have heard enough whining from the poor progressive left about the so called right wing media. For 50+ years the majority of US citizens (that would be those on the center right) had to be force fed a daily barrage of progressive garbage called the nightly news and public television.

Then, as news expanded into cable we were given that same twaddle, only now we had it 24 x 7. Did the center right create subversive organizations like media matters who’s sole purpose is to limit speech by attempting to drive alternative sources of news off the air? No, they sat back and took it and eventually used outlets like magazines and talk radio to reach the majority of Americans. What was the progressive answer to the competition from talk radio? Boycotts against advertisers and having politicians attempt to re-institute the “fairness doctrine”.

Then comes Fox News who would bring the country hard news from the center and display a mostly right wing cast of editorial commentators. In short order Fox would take a huge lead in the ratings and progressives began to lose their minds and become white with anger. How dare anyone compete with establishment media monopoly and expand speech…The public can not handle competing ideas, they have to be controlled. Again, the reaction from progressives and others on the fringe is to find a way to silence Fox rather than compete in the arena of ideas…shameful and un-American.

“It’s a grand day for journalism. May his rotten empire go down in flames.”

On my worst days, I never referred to Ted Turners Empire as rotten and never wished that it would “go down in flames” nor did I wish MSNBC, PBS, NBC, ABC, CBS or NPR off the airwaves. I may disagree with progressive drivel, but I want those ideas to be heard, I want the American people to make up their own minds and embrace the philosophy that most suits their values.

Regardless of what happens to New Corporation’s “Empire”, the model has been created, there is a huge market for alternative media. The vacuum will be filled and progressive fringe groups like media matters will have a new villain to debase and boycott…The great protectors of limited speech.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 11:56:15

Then comes Fox News who would bring the country hard news from the center

There is nothing “from the center” about Fox News - maybe from the center of your world but not from the center of the average American political spectrum.

Much of FOX “hard news” is right-wing editorial propaganda disguised as news.

You also have to look at FOX’s message, who they support and are supported by (the globalists, bankers and wealth concentrating re-distributors) and the consequences of their supporter’s public policy influence.

The consequences can easily be seen. Richer rich, gutted economy, police state, endless wars and a vanishing middle-class. If you feel good about supporting NewsCorp which facilitates the above and engages in illegal activities, you really don’t get the big picture.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2011-07-19 12:00:10

Journalism is journalism. Twaddle is twaddle. But it takes about 20 IQ points to tell the difference, apparently.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:49:22

If you think Fox News is center, you’re haven’t a clue.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-20 01:19:00

Most of what is on Fox is opinion and outright lies. There is very little factual content.

I have stopped watching most of the other cable news channels as well. Too much opinion and too little news.

We do have a regional cable news channel that is mostly news that I still watch. Its format is similar to what the original Headline News was - international, national, local news, weather, sports. Mostly the same thing over and over all day long, but I can pretty much count on getting actual news anytime of the day or night.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-20 01:22:04

I really despise the talking heads interviewing political spinmeisters that shout each other down. Takes me back to Saturday Night Live - “Jane, you ignorant slut.”

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 07:38:57

Q:
Is there a way to read the blog that I can see only new postings and not the old ones. I’ve to scroll everytime on this page and look for new ones. I’m sure there is some application people are using to see the comments in a different format. Thanks.

Comment by drumminj
2011-07-19 08:13:17

yes. A firefox extension I created:

http://mysite.ncnetwork.net/drumminj_tx/joshuatree.html

Comment by Martin
2011-07-19 09:41:32

Amazing. Thanks a lot.

 
 
 
Comment by butters
2011-07-19 07:56:00

No insider information, I will stay cash….. From ZeroHedge.

Earlier today we saw what happens to investment banks when the Fed no longer clearly telegraphs its intentions vis-a-vis which asset has to be frontran (see Goldman post earlier). It is not just banks. In the absence of the Fed semaphore, it turns out even such “legendary” hedge funds as Soros’ $25 billion Quantum are about as clueless as everyone else. Bloomberg reports that “the fund is about 75 percent in cash as it waits for better opportunities, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the firm is private.” The reason: ““I find the current situation much more baffling and much less predictable than I did at the time of the height of the financial crisis,” Soros, 80, said in April at a conference at Bretton Woods organized by his Institute for New Economic Thinking.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:54:32

“They want your effin’ retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something? They’ll get it . . . they’ll get it all from you sooner or later cause they own this effin’ place.

It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.”

- George Carlin

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-07-20 01:27:33

The world has become significantly less predictable since the crisis in September, 2009. All systems have become increasingly chaotic (mathematically speaking).

It reminds me of the footage of the Tacoma Narrows bridge before it tore itself apart (it had a cameo in a commercial in the last decade).

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 08:00:20

Chrysler UAW workers caught drinking, smoking pot during lunch – for the third time

Submitted by Patrick Rall on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 18:21

This time the Jefferson North plant isn’t involved but once again, Chrysler workers have been caught by Fox 2 Detroit drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana – this time while on lunch break from the Trenton Engine Facility. Not only are they so brazen as to drink and use illegal drugs out in public in broad daylight – but they are parking in a lot directly behind the local UAW hall while doing this. Chrysler spoke on the segment about this problem with Fox 2 Detroit, assuring the public that they were working to identify the employees caught on tape and once they did, the employees will be “suspended indefinitely”. We can assume that if Chrysler can positively identify these workers, these folks will have plenty more time to spend their afternoons smokin’ and drinkin’, as they will most likely (and deservingly) be excused from their duties. Considering the amount of unemployment in this area and how many auto workers are out of work, you would think that those who DO have a job wouldn’t be so stupid as to get drunk and high during and before work but the videos show us otherwise.

http://www.torquenews.com/106/chrysler-uaw-workers-caught-drinking-smoking-pot-during-lunch-%E2%80%93-third-time - 47k -

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:29:16

I’ve witnessed similar behavior from non-union, white collar workers where I have worked in the past.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:51:00

In other words, stupidity knows no boundaries.

Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 09:23:27

Yeah, it’s not 1968 anymore.

All though the way the advertise beer on tv, you would think it would be ok.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by drumminj
2011-07-19 08:52:19

non-union, white collar worker

Sure, but what did their work contracts say (regarding alcohol, at least)? And were they doing manufacturing work?

Drinking when on break for a manufacturing job is WAY different than having a drink over lunch when all you do is sit at a computer and press keys all day.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 15:56:02

That’s what the SEC said.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 16:12:01

“That’s what the SEC said.”

Are you talking porn? Or last year’s trading glitch plunge? :-)

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:22:06

All of the above.

 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 10:48:26

I’ve witnessed similar behavior from non-union, white collar workers where I have worked in the past.

Me too. So did my mother.

Back when my mother worked for the gas company in Pittsburgh, she was the assistant safety director for the whole company. And it was well known that she was really acting in the capacity of the director, who spent a good part of his workday drunk as a skunk.

Said director was well-connected with the higher-ups, so there was no way that he’d lose his job. Which Mom kept right on doing for him.

Well, time came when he left the company, the job came open, and guess whose mother wasn’t hired? I came along a short while later, and it being the 1950s, it was unseemly for a woman to work outside the home after the birth of a child.

As for Mom’s boss, his drinking caught up with him. He got fired from his post-gas company job.

 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 08:02:18

Brazil (Bubble?) Bulletin

Figures just in. Rio’s apartment prices have almost doubled in 3 years. Here are the median monthly rent vs buy costs for 3 bedroom apartments in 3 Rio neighborhoods. (Priced in US dollars $/Source: O Globo Newspaper)

Ipanema: (Rich/Beach close-in neighborhood)
Cost to buy: $1.3 million
Cost to rent: $7K

Copacabana: (middle/upper middle class/Beach close-in neighborhood)
Cost to buy: $592K
Cost to rent: $2.6K

Meier: (Middle class, distant suburb with no beach & surrounded by slums )
Cost to buy: $154K
Cost to rent: $700

I think interest rates are about 9% here for 20 year loans. 20-30% down and mostly cash deals are typical. Based on rent/buy costs is this a bubble?

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:11:24

“is this a bubble?”

What is the annual income of the typical buyer in the “Meier” neighborhood? I seem to recall you saying that the typical cubicle dweller over there earns $1000-2000 per month. If that is the target demographic, then I would say yes, there is a bubble.

What are costs in cities other than Rio or Sao Paolo? Is it more affordable?

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 09:13:35

the typical cubicle dweller over there earns $1000-2000 per month.

Maybe $1500-2500 now in Rio but I don’t have a good handle on this. But Brazilians have much more equity in their homes compared to Americans because mortgages have only been available the past 7 years or so. It’s the first time buyers getting hammered.

What are costs in cities other than Rio or Sao Paolo? Is it more affordable?

No decent areas of Brazilian cities are “cheap” but yes, Rio and Sao Paulo are the least affordable Brazilian cities.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 11:12:47

And these are apartment prices. I don’t even want to think what a house costs there! Or do people prefer apartments for security reasons? I know these days in Mexico City if you have a house it has to be secured like a fortress.

Anecdote: the street we used to live on in the “Herradura” neighborhood on Mexico City’s West side now has gated guard stations at each end of the block, and even then people are robbed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2011-07-19 08:14:57

Yes. But the bubbles in true metropolis like Rio, NYC, Singapore, Hongkong can last for decades.

 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-07-19 10:31:47

Is it true the Brazilian woman love the gringos?

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 11:14:25

They do if they have lots of money!

Kidding aside, if its anything like Mexico, upper middle class and above view Americans with disdain.

Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-07-19 11:34:22

That is not what I read. Apparently Gringo do very well in Brazil. Plus Brazilian woman are much hotter than Mexican.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 12:30:54

if its anything like Mexico, upper middle class and above view Americans with disdain.

In Brazil in general, the mid and higher classes don’t look upon Americans with disdain. They think we do some things better than them and they do some things better than us. Brazilians are known for being nice and most really are on a personal level. I did catch heat about W but when Obama was elected most of that went away. They didn’t like us bombing Libya the same time Obama came to Brazil though. They like Americans but not a lot of our policies.

Or do people prefer apartments for security reasons?

Most middle class people from Rio don’t know too much about houses which are usually row houses on gated cul-de-sac side streets butting up to a big rock mountain and sometimes with a guard or even guards in the richest areas. Middle class row houses cost a bit more than apts and you save about $200-300 a month in condo fees. The houses with “yards” in the richest areas are of the charts in prices. I’ll bet an average apt is a bit safer than a gated/non guarded row house and that is in people’s minds. It sounds to me that Rio is a bit safer than the Mexico City you remember or even of today and Rio is a funny place. It is known mostly for muggings. Sao Paulo is known for the brutal home invasions. IDK why.

They do if they have lots of money!

As is everywhere, there is that aspect too. The main problem with a gringo meeting a nice Brazilian girl in Brazil is the language. Yes some of the middle class and rich girls speak English but in Rio de Janeiro, they’ve seen gringo tourists come and go all of their lives so the novelty has worn off. Of course money and looks will help. Now if a gringo goes to somewhere like Belém or the North East, that’s a totally different story because they don’t see as many gringos.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 11:33:45

Is it true the Brazilian woman love the gringos?

I don’t know if Brazilian women love gringos any more or less than they love Brazilians but they tend to be loving in general if they love someone.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 16:50:08

Ipanema: (Rich/Beach close-in neighborhood)
Cost to buy: $1.3 million
Cost to rent: $7K

WRONG WRONG Sorry

The the cost to rent the 3bd apartment in Ipanema is $4.4K a month NOT $7K. I forgot to convert to US dollars. All the other figures I listed on Copacabana, Meier and Ipanema were correctly converted.

This tells me the high end (Ipanema is most overvalued) $1.3 million to buy and $4.4K per month to rent.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 08:05:47

Federal workers more likely to die than lose jobs
By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY

Federal employees’ job security is so great that workers in many agencies are more likely to die of natural causes than get laid off or fired, a USA TODAY analysis finds.

Death — rather than poor performance, misconduct or layoffs — is the primary threat to job security at the Environmental Protection Agency, the Small Business Administration, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Office of Management and Budget and a dozen other federal operations.

The federal government fired 0.55% of its workers in the budget year that ended Sept. 30 — 11,668 employees in its 2.1 million workforce. Research shows that the private sector fires about 3% of workers annually for poor performance, says John Palguta, former research chief at the federal Merit Systems Protection Board, which handles federal firing disputes.

The 1,800-employee Federal Communications Commission and the 1,200-employee Federal Trade Commission didn’t lay off or fire a single employee last year. The SBA had no layoffs, six firings and 17 deaths in its 4,000-employee workforce.

When job security is at a premium, the federal government remains the place to work for those who want to avoid losing a job. The job security rate for all federal workers was 99.43% last year and nearly 100% for those on the job more than a few years.

HUD spokesman Jerry Brown says his department’s low dismissal rate — providing a 99.85% job security rate for employees — shows a skilled and committed workforce. “We’ve never focused on firing people, and we don’t intend to start now. We’re more focused on hiring the right people,” he says.

San Francisco State University management professor John Sullivan, an expert on employee turnover, says the low departure rates show a failure to release poor performers and those with obsolete skills. “Rather than indicating something positive, rates below 1% in the firing and layoff components would indicate a serious management problem,” he says.

The government laid off 385 people in reorganizations last year — a 0.02% rate, or one in every 6,000 employees. No comparable private sector layoff rate is available.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 08:27:34

FWIW, unlike Corporate America, which fires people simply to boost the bottom line, FedGov has no such incentive. As long as they can continue to borrow money there is no reason to reduce headcount. Government grew under both the GOP and the Dems.

Comment by CA renter
2011-07-20 03:32:52

And like Mr. Brown said in the article, government employees tend to be more thoroughly screened during the hiring process.

In every case I know of, public employers have higher requirements WRT education and experience vs. their private sector counterparts. And government workers will tend to be more security conscious, so they value having a steady job, and will be more likely to keep their noses clean at work.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 08:18:37

If you had a Chia Pet you were a farmer.

Meeting set over USDA loan bias

By Susan Salisbury Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 10:32 a.m. Tuesday, July 19, 2011

WEST PALM BEACH — Hispanic, female, black and native American farmers and ranchers may be eligible for claims under several alleged discrimination agreements reached with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The topic will be addressed at 6 p.m. today at Exhibit Hall A, Clayton Hutcheson Center, 559 N. Military Trail, near West Palm Beach.

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Frederick Pfaeffle is scheduled to speak. Farmers in groups who were denied equal access to USDA loans during certain time periods may be entitled to awards of up to $50,000.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:00:10

I personally know a black farmer who was effed hard by this.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 08:32:10

UnitedHealth 2Q Profit Soars With Enrollment
July 19, 2011 | FOXBusiness

UnitedHealth (UNH) reported on Tuesday stronger-than-expected second-quarter profit as customers continued to enroll in its many offerings, leading the company to lift its fiscal view.

The largest U.S. health insurer booked net earnings of $1.3 billion, or $1.16 a share, compared with $1.12 billion, or 99 cents a share, in the same quarter last year, and ahead of average analyst estimates polled by Thomson Reuters of 94 cents.

Revenue for the Minnetonka, Minn.-based company was $25.2 billion, up 8% from $23.26 billion a year ago, matching the Street’s view.

“We are achieving strong and consistent growth as customers respond to our focus on consistent fundamental execution and solutions-oriented innovation around their needs,” UnitedHealth chief executive, Stephen Hemsley, said in a statement.

Comment by Steve J
2011-07-19 09:27:51

Obama are strikes again.

 
Comment by Left Ohio
2011-07-19 09:53:40

The invisible hand of the free market is a healing hand indeed. In our weekly work newsletter e-mail is a classified soliciting donations for 10 year old Daphne who has a rare type of cancer. She has exhausted her insurance coverage and her parents have been reduced to offering pins and ribbons supporting her struggle with cancer in exchange for donations toward her treatment expenses.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 10:00:51

10 year old Daphne who has a rare type of cancer. She has exhausted her insurance coverage and her parents have been reduced to offering pins and ribbons

And her “exhausted” insurance company makes billions and its CEO makes millions.

What a country. What a people.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 10:22:33

God Bless America!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 10:24:35

“In our weekly work newsletter e-mail is a classified soliciting donations for 10 year old Daphne who has a rare type of cancer”

And then there’s those ubiquitous “begging jars” you see at the mom-n-pop stores, with some tyke’s photo taped to it, begging for spare change to help pay for little Jared’s leukemia treatment.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 11:22:20

They should contact St.Judes and see if they have a program for her. They would not be turned down for lack of ins.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 08:57:18

Well Mr. respective mayor, I can tell you one thing that will happen if you tax each bullet a dollar. Bullet sales will plummet, however there will still plenty purchased, it will just not be in Baltimore.

‘Bullet Tax’ Proposed By Mayoral Candidate - WBAL TV

BALTIMORE — A city mayoral candidate’s plan to reduce violence in Baltimore includes a “bullet tax” that he said will increase the cost of committing a crime.

Otis Rolley said he would, if elected, propose a $1 per bullet tax on all bullet purchases in the city. He also said he wants to improve recruitment standards and training for the Baltimore City Police Department, work closely with the media to increase awareness of wanted suspects, and reduce the number of vacant properties.

The Rolley Plan To Reduce Crime In Baltimore

Rolley released his plan Tuesday. He cited recent holiday violence at the Inner Harbor and the city’s reputation as one of the most violent in the country as reasons for change.

“It is unacceptable that too many of us feel unsafe in own city, own neighborhoods, even in our own homes,” he said.

As for the bullet tax, Rolley said the measure would cause a decrease in “random firings that too often happen around holidays” and put a high price tag on the cost of committing a crime.

“While the courts have consistently ruled against significant gun control legislation, there is still a way to decrease crime: substantially increase the cost of its commission,” Rolley’s plan states.

“Increasing the cost of guns won’t work, because many criminals don’t purchase new guns, and they can be borrowed or even rented in some areas,” his plan states.

Comment by drumminj
2011-07-19 09:11:28

A city mayoral candidate’s plan to reduce violence in Baltimore includes a “bullet tax” that he said will increase the cost of committing a crime.

And make protecting oneself cost-prohibitive. Genius.

Guess I’ll just buy 6 bullets for my revolver. But I can’t afford to go to the range to practice/become competent with the gun. I’m sure nothing bad will happen when I go to use it “for real”.

Idiots.

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 09:23:08

The comedian Chris Rock had a funny bit once about charging $10,000 a bullet to bring down gun related crime.

In the real world that would open up a great black market opportunity.

I believe this mayor prospect may also be thinking the $1 tax will bring in some added revenue. It would have an adverse effect instead.

Comment by Robin
2011-07-19 23:04:31

Disagree.

With some previous NRA training, I think one clip should suffice for a tune-up. $1 per hollow-point substitute is fine with me - :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 09:18:02

We are also going to need a Hammer Tax.

Port St. Lucie 17-year-old accused of bludgeoning parents to death, then having party

By Will Greenlee
TCPalm

Posted July 18, 2011

PORT ST. LUCIE — Tyler Hadley posted an invitation to a party on Facebook, then killed his parents with a hammer before as many as 60 people attended the gathering at his home on Granduer Avenue, according to police.

Early Sunday morning, Port St. Lucie police received an anonymous tip indicating a 17-year-old might have killed his parents and the bodies were in the home. Police went to the home about 4:20 a.m. Sunday.

There police found a hammer between the bodies of Mary Jo Hadley, 47, and 54-year-old Blake Hadley. Tyler Hadley, 17, was arrested late Sunday and charged with two counts of first-degree murder.

“It was a merciless killing. It was brutal and the Facebook invitation — a party to have your friends and 40 to 60 people come over — I think speaks for itself,” Port St. Lucie police Capt. Don Kryak said, standing at the scene Monday. “The blunt force trauma to the head and torso with a 22-inch framing hammer can effect a considerable amount of injury.”

http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2011/jul/18/port-st-lucie-police-conducting-death-investigatio/ - 127k -

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 09:33:56

Looks like Chicago needs a bullet tax…

Chicago man kills another over dripping air conditioner

CHICAGO (STMW) - A dripping window air conditioner led to the execution-style killing of a West Side man, police said Monday.

Charles Sims, 28, shot Jimmy Parker eight times about 2 a.m. on June 2, police said. Sims appeared in court Monday on a charge of first-degree murder. He is being held without bond.

Sims’ sister had complained to him that Parker dropped water on her from the window of an apartment building in the 5600 block of West Washington, police said.

But the water was simply condensation falling from an air conditioner in a third-floor apartment where the 29-year-old Parker was visiting a woman, Chicago Police Detective Anthony Noradin said.

The warm water fell on Sims’ sister when she returned home to the building shortly before midnight on June 1, police said. She called police to report the incident.

She also told her brother, who returned to the building and confronted Parker outside, police said. When Parker denied it, Sims punched him, police said.

Then Parker hit Sims, who allegedly pulled a 9mm handgun and shot Parker. Sims allegedly stood over Parker to finish him off, Noradin said.

“He administered a coup de grace of sorts,” he said.

Six witnesses have identified Sims as the shooter, Noradin said, adding that Sims has denied involvement in the shooting.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 09:45:42

I really hate to do this but we`re going to need a few more taxes.

Suburban West Palm man charged with beating girlfriend with shoe, belt, spray can

By Michael Finch II Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 12:05 p.m. Tuesday, July 19, 2011

When the ex girlfriend of a 27-year-old man came to collect her final possessions from a suburban West Palm Beach home, she allegedly was not allowed to leave before he beat her with a leather shoe, belt and an aerosol spray can.

Taroy Bernard was arrested by Palm Beach County Sheriff’s deputies on charges of three counts of aggravated battery, according to an arrest report.

This morning, Palm Beach County Circuit Court Judge Edward H. Fine ordered Bernard released on a $5,000 bond and to have no contact with the victim.

When the woman, who was named in the report, arrived at the home she was approached by Bernard who began striking her back and body with a leather sandal, the report said.

Bernard somehow stopped to allow her to continue collecting her things and placing them in her car.

When the woman went back into the house, Bernard began hitting her in the head several times with a metal spray can.

According to the report, the woman was treated at Good Samaritan Medical Center for several superficial marks to her back, as well as 4-inch abrasion, a 3-inch abrasion to her arm and several lumps on her head.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:03:59

I wonder why she left him? Seems like real charmer to me.

I hope he finds a new girlfriend in jail.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 09:49:32

“Charles Sims, 28, shot Jimmy Parker eight times about 2 a.m. on June 2, police said.”

If they only had the ‘Bullet Tax’ he probably could have only afforded to shoot him six times.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-07-19 11:20:17

Looks like Chicago needs a bullet tax…

Sounds more like we need an a/c tax…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 09:39:36

And a Machete Tax, we need one of those too.

Judge orders man accused of attacking wife with machete held without bond

By Michael Finch II Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 11:33 a.m. Tuesday, July 19, 2011

A suburban Boca Raton man who allegedly struck his wife multiple times with a machete was ordered held with no bond this morning by Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Edward H. Fine.

Tilakdharry Basdeo, 33, was arrested Monday afternoon on charges of attempted first degree murder, aggravated assault and child abuse, according to a Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office arrest report.

When the woman arrived home around 3:30 p.m. Monday, Basdeo, who was outside chopping trees, called a family meeting to discuss his wife staying out late the previous night.

The discussion soon escalated to an enraged argument between the two, according to the report.

An allegedly frustrated Basdeo left the room while shouting, “I’m going to get a machete and cut you into pieces.”

He then returned to make good on his claim, holding his wife down and swinging the machete toward her shoulder several times, the report says.

When the couple’s daughter began to cry, Basdeo raised the machete above his head as if to strike her and yelled, ’stop crying,’ the report said.

But when his daughter screamed for him to stop, he returned to strike the mother four to five more times, the report said.

An apparently dazed Basdeo then dropped the machete and walked into the dining room.

Sheriff’s deputies responded to the Marlin Drive residence in suburban Boca Raton around 4:45 p.m. after Basdeo made a 911 call saying, ‘I think i just murdered my wife.’

Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 10:20:02

Looks like Fl. needs to go on and add a circular saw tax also.

Teen’s hand hacked up as dad cuts off plaster cast with circular saw. From: NewsCore - July 19, 2011 3:28PM

A US man was charged with child abuse after he used a circular saw to cut a plaster cast off the hand of his teenage son, causing severe injuries.

An affidavit from Coral Springs police revealed Lawrence Roberts, 33, used a 25cm saw - usually used to cut wood - to try to cut the purple cast off the right hand of his 15-year-old son about 11am today (local time), the Sun Sentinel in Florida said.

“The defendant cut off the top of the victim’s right thumb, [and] the middle of the victim’s right index finger was almost cut entirely off,” the affidavit said.

His son also received a 7.6cm cut on his right hand, between his thumb and index finger, and was taken to the Coral Springs Medical Centre for treatment before being taken to a Fort Lauderdale facility for emergency surgery to repair his thumb.

Medical personnel also removed the cast, police spokesman Sergeant Dave Kirkland said.

Mr Roberts, who was charged with aggravated child abuse, was released on $7500 bond today.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 10:31:06

Teen’s hand hacked up as dad cuts off plaster cast with circular saw.

“Looks like Fl. needs to go on and add a circular saw tax also.”

I think this would fall under the Dumb@ss Tax.

But if one of those could be put in place there wouldn’t be any problems with the debt ceiling, we would have surpluses as far as the eye could see.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 10:31:33

Teen’s hand hacked up as dad cuts off plaster cast with circular saw.

…..to save money because he was under or uninsured I bet.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 10:39:14

“…..to save money because he was under or uninsured I bet.”

No doubt. I’ll bet the office visit would have been at least $200.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-07-19 10:42:27

“…..to save money because he was under or uninsured I bet.”

This would fall under the Dumb@ss Tax if he is insured, under insured or uninsured.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 11:26:09

…..”to save money because he was under or uninsured I bet”.

Nah, the guys a stone cold idiot. If you wanted to cut off your own cast you simply buy a vibrating cast cutting saw/grout cutting saw at Northern Tool for $39.00.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 11:54:19

Nah, the guys a stone cold idiot. If you wanted to cut off your own cast you simply buy a vibrating cast cutting saw/grout cutting saw at Northern Tool for $39.00.

No doubt he’s an idiot. But why was he cutting it off himself? Does he also do appendectomies with a some needlenose pliers and an exacto knife?

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 12:12:48

“No doubt he’s an idiot. But why was he cutting it off himself”?

Some people especially younger folks cut off their own casts more than you might think. I personally know two teenagers that cut theirs off when it was time, this past summer. May not be the smartest thing to do, but it is not always a case of no ins. or money.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 12:42:52

Nah, the guys a stone cold idiot. If you wanted to cut off your own cast you simply buy a vibrating cast cutting saw/grout cutting saw at Northern Tool for $39.00.

Unless of course you already own a jigsaw with a wood bit.

(kidding)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-07-19 09:56:20

Ex-trader admits threatening to kill U.S. regulators

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former commodities trader pleaded guilty on Monday to threatening to kill more than 40 financial regulators, including the heads of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Vincent McCrudden, 50, admitted in court that he posted the threats on his company’s website last December, asking for help executing his plan. His guilty plea came the day testimony was to begin in his federal trial, said his lawyer Bruce Barket.

McCrudden pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Central Islip, New York, to two counts of transmission of threats to injure.

His posts included the names of current and former officials including SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro and CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler, as well as officials at the National Futures Association and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

“These people have got to go! And I need your help, there are just too many for me alone,” McCrudden wrote in one post, according to the indictment.

He also sent an email last September to Daniel Driscoll, the executive vice president and chief operating officer of the NFA, that said: “It wasn’t ever a question of ‘if’ I was going to kill you, it was just a question of when.”

McCrudden faces up to 10 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for December 5.

McCrudden worked on Wall Street for more than 20 years, specializing in commodities, derivatives and foreign exchange, according to his biography on the website of his company, Alnbri Management LLC.

“This defendant crossed the line when he directly threatened to kill public officials who were working to keep our financial markets fair and open, and invited others to join him,” Loretta Lynch, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said in a statement.

Barket, of law firm Quadrino Schwartz, said McCrudden apologized in court when he entered his plea. He called his client “a talented, decent guy who will find other work.”

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 10:25:02

This defendant crossed the line when he directly threatened to kill public officials

Ya think?

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:06:37

Damn regulations!

Oh wait…

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 10:00:38

Hotel occupancy rate hits 3-year high
charlotteobserver.com

Charlotte’s hotel industry is showing signs of strength, according to figures released last week by the Charlotte Regional Visitors Authority.

May’s occupancy rate was 66.1 percent, the highest rate in three years. In addition, the CRVA said 664,309 hotel rooms were sold in May, the most since October 2007.

The Charlotte, N.C. hotel market went into steep dive during the first two years of the recession, with occupancy rates and revenue falling faster than the national average, and faster than the city’s 13 peer cities, which include Tampa, Atlanta, St. Louis, Greensboro and Raleigh.

But in the past year, Charlotte hotel business has improved.

The Charlotte area’s occupancy rate for the first five months of the year is 61 percent, compared with 58 percent for the peer cities. The revenue per room in Charlotte is $51, compared with $53 in the peer cities.

The upswing began in the winter and spring of 2010, and has continued.

“We have come back to a degree,” said Mark Schwantner, general manager of the Renaissance Charlotte Suite Hotel. “Our corporate business is a little bit better than expected.”

Schwantner said occupancy and other measures are a few percentage points higher than in 2010.

“We’re not back to the heyday yet,” he said, referring to 2007 and 2008, before the recession.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:09:22

3 year high?! That’s not saying much! :lol:

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 10:26:27

Goldman Sachs Targets 1,000 Layoffs

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — Goldman Sachs(GS_) might layoff as many as 1,000 employees globally as it copes with a more difficult operating environment, management said during the analyst conference call on Tuesday.

The investment bank offered little details on the nature of the layoffs, saying it would be broad-based, but that it was unlikely to be significant in its growth markets where it continues to invest.

Goldman is targeting $1.2 billion in compensation and non-compensation expenses this year, the effects of which are likely to be fully realized only next year, CFO David Viniar said.

Management is focused on the dollar savings rather than the “number of heads”, meaning that layoffs could be both at the senior and the junior level, Viniar added.

Compensation expenses declined 16% year on year in the second quarter to $3.20 billion or 44% of total revenues.

Analysts have been expecting investment banks to reduce headcount in order to drive profitability as revenues remain under pressure. Goldman already said in a filing recently that it would cut 230 employees in the New York region this year.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-07-19 10:37:45

“Goldman Sachs(GS_) might layoff as many as 1,000 employees ”

“Goldman is targeting $1.2 billion in compensation and non-compensation expenses this year,”

So just how much is the average employee paid? 1 million per year?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 11:32:11

The DOW is loving all the strong profit reports today! Hammering it’s way to 13,000. If wall street is happy them everyone should be happy!

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-07-19 12:01:10

They seem to be reacting positively to the Gang of Six plan that appears likely to gain traction in the Senate and the WH. Let’s see if it goes anywhere.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:10:41

It won’t. There will be much hype and then it will fizzle.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 12:05:39

Man accused of hacking millions of papers at MIT

BOSTON (AP) — A Harvard University fellow studying ethics has been accused of using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s computer network to steal nearly 5 million academic articles.

A federal indictment released Tuesday accused 24-year-old Aaron Swartz of stealing the documents from JSTOR, a subscription service that offers digitized copies of articles from more than 1,000 academic journals.

Prosecutors say Swartz hacked into MIT’s system between September and January after breaking into a computer wiring closet on campus. The indictment says Swartz was a fellow at Harvard’s Center for Ethics at the time. Prosecutors say he intended to distribute the articles on file-sharing websites.

Swartz was released on $100,000 unsecured bond after pleading not guilty at his arraignment Tuesday to charges including wire fraud. He faces up to 35 years in prison if convicted.

Comment by 2banana
2011-07-19 12:24:23

The indictment says Swartz was a fellow at Harvard’s Center for Ethics

A 24 year old university FELLOW????

Comment by ahansen
2011-07-19 13:26:18

Smart AND ethical….

Academic research papers are fostered by public institutions of higher learning (or private ones with public funding.) They are based upon (and peer reviewed by,) the publicly-supported work of those who went before. There is an implicit understanding that knowledge is a public good, not a private domain.

Open sourcing=an informed electorate. Or so the thinking goes….

 
Comment by bink
2011-07-19 14:34:48

He was founder of a company that merged with reddit.com years ago. He might have been fairly well off.

It seems silly that he’s being charged with all these crimes for surreptitiously using MIT’s network to gain access to and spider scholarly journals. He should be charged with trespass and being an incredible nerd. It doesn’t sound like there was any hacking involved. He just broke into a closet and plugged into their network.

There’s probably a lot more to it than we’re hearing now.

Comment by ahansen
2011-07-19 14:42:59

And you can bet your booty it has to do with DARPA.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 13:22:25

I’ve already gotten a “give money for legal defense” missive from one of the progressive groups. Didn’t donate any.

I’d like to hear more of the facts of the case before advocating for or against this guy.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 12:48:39

Consumers are consuming Apple!

Investors Ready for Another Blowout Apple Quarter- Reuters

Apple Inc likely will dazzle investors with another round of strong quarterly results on Tuesday, propelled by demand for its iPhone and the new iPad 2 tablets.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 12:59:42

Man the pumps…

IMF: Debt threatens to engulf Europe

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — The debt crisis engulfing Europe poses a significant risk to the global economy and the European Union must take decisive action to stop the spread of contagion, the International Monetary Fund said Tuesday.

In a review of euro zone financial policies, the IMF said the economic recovery is “solid” in most EU nations.

But the fund warned that unresolved fiscal problems in Greece, Ireland and Portugal could “spill over” into other nations and threaten the global economy.

“There was shared concern that the sovereign tensions could spill over into the core economies via the financial system with large adverse regional and global implications,” the report states.

The report comes ahead of a key meeting in Brussels on Thursday. European leaders are set to hammer out the terms of a second bailout for Greece and discuss the intensifying debt crisis as it threatens to spread to Italy and Spain.

“The crisis in the periphery is not fully addressed yet,” said Luc Everaert, a division chief in the IMF’s European Department. “And the directors think this should be done very urgently.”

Comment by michael
2011-07-19 13:53:50

The Bernank should patent his printing press.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:13:05

Please don’t give him any ideas!

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 13:44:38

This is a tried and true way to boost sales, raise your prices…

Nissan Boosts Leaf Price, Expands Sales
(Bloomberg)

Nissan Boosts Leaf Price, Expands Sales

Nissan Motor Co., the top-seller of electric cars in the U.S., is lifting the price of the battery- powered Leaf as much as 10 percent and expanding sales to nine more states, mostly in the South.

A 2012 SV grade Leaf will cost $35,200, or 7.4 percent more than the 2011 SV’s $32,780 price, while the 2012 SL version rises to $37,250 from $33,720, Nissan said in a statement today. The increase covers new standard equipment, said Brendan Jones, Nissan’s U.S. sales manager for Leaf.

“There’s a higher content level on the cars, including a cold-weather package that’s now standardized for both grades,” and fast-charge capability for the SL that allows it to be recharged in as little as 30 minutes from a high-voltage charger, Jones said in a phone interview. The price increases aren’t related to sales volume, he said.

Nissan, Japan’s second-largest automaker, sold a record 1,708 Leafs to U.S. drivers in June and 3,875 in 2011’s first half, topping General Motors Co. (GM)’s rival plug-in Chevrolet Volt by more than 1,000 cars. The Yokohama-based company has been working to accelerate deliveries after initial snags left some U.S. customers waiting more than a year to get their cars.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 14:26:17

I’m starting to see them…uh…grow (sprout?) around here big time. I see one just about every day now. Of course, I think every one I’ve seen is blue, so maybe it’s just the same guy driving around in circles.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 14:36:10

Here in Tucson, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Leaf on the road. But the Prius? Man, those things are ubiquitous.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-07-19 15:02:39

Yeah, I’ve a particular disdain for Prii. Not because I don’t like the technology, but because for some reason they seem to have replaced the minivan as the vehicle most likely to be moving slow in the left lane.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:14:33

As I’ve said, in general, supply and demand is a fairy tale.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 13:50:14

Fed Bank Directors Expressed ‘Heightened Caution’ on Outlook for
Bloomberg - Jul 19, 2011

Directors at the Federal Reserve’s regional banks expressed “heightened caution” about the pace of improvement in the economy, according to minutes of Board of Governors’ meetings in May and June.

The directors of the 12 banks “generally noted that recent economic data had been weaker than expected, and they expressed a heightened caution about the likely pace of improvement in the economy over coming quarters,” according to the minutes released in Washington today, which summarize discussions at the regional banks.

The minutes show that directors of the Fed’s regional banks shared Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s view in a press conference last month that some of the “headwinds” facing the economy, such as weakness in housing, “may be stronger and more persistent than we thought.”

“Several directors attributed the slower pace of recovery, in part, to factors that were likely to be transitory, but they expected the recovery would only be moderately strong even after those factors had dissipated,” according to the record of the meetings.

Previous summaries of discount rate meetings included the sentence that “most directors recommended that the current accommodative stance of monetary policy be maintained.” Today’s release said instead that “most directors recommended that the current primary credit rate be maintained.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 15:23:20

Fine by me.

Postmaster: Saturday mail delivery could end soon
By John Bacon, USA TODAY

Saturday mail delivery could end soon and in 15 years “we’ll be talking about delivering mail three days a week,” Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe told the USA TODAY Editorial Board today.

USA TODAY staffer Carly Mallenbaum reports that Donahue forecasts an $8.3 billion loss in the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30 as the nation’s drift from paper to electronic communication continues to hammer the Postal Service. Even first-class mail, which had been the top moneymaker, stopped turning a profit when the recession hit, Donahoe says.

Donahoe told the board that eliminating Saturday mail delivery could happen soon, but stopped short of calling it “likely.” He did cite a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll from 2010 that showed more than half of Americans had no problem with dropping Saturday mail delivery.

USPS also is reviewing 3,600 post offices for potential elimination. Donahoe says the Postal Service will conduct customer meetings and make final decisions next spring.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-07-19 15:43:53

Fine by me too. Matter of fact, if they dropped it down to three or four days, I’d be okay.

 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-19 15:58:23

They should just do once a week, say every Thursday. That would simplify my life.

Comment by bink
2011-07-19 17:34:09

But, but, but… NETFLIX!

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-19 18:13:48

Good point! I wonder how many billions of dollars subsidize Netflix!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-20 05:13:21

This is a DUMB idea…..unless you keep the post offices Open on Saturdays. Its amazing how busy they are here… they started closing last year at 5pm when its been 7pm M-F for probably 20 years, so now they are jammed on Saturdays

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 15:26:45

Relaxation drinks see energetic growth in U.S.

(Reuters) - People have been guzzling energy drinks for the last 10 years — maybe it’s time to relax.

Sales of “relaxation drinks” with names like Vacation in a Bottle, Dream Water and Just Chill, while small, are growing.

“There is clear potential for further growth in the coming years,” said Cecilia Martinez, market analyst at UK-based beverage research group Zenith International.

Relaxation drinks help the body chill out by relieving muscle tension and reducing levels of cortisone, the main stress hormone, according to a report that Martinez wrote about the drinks earlier this year.

The drinks, which evolved in Japan as far back as 2005, contain no alcohol but some have melatonin, a hormone that can cause drowsiness.

The biggest relaxation brands include Innovative Beverage Group’s Drank, Purple Stuff and Jones GABA. Another called Slow Cow is up and coming. Their names provide a marked contrast to engine-revving energy drinks such as Red Bull, Hansen Natural’s Monster and Dr Pepper Snapple Group’s Venom Energy.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 16:16:12

Why do energy drinks taste so nasty and why do people drink them?

That alone tells me the human race is insane.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-07-19 16:43:15

Why do energy drinks taste so nasty and why do people drink them?

Because when used as a mixer you can drink twice as much vodka.

(But the next day you realize it.) My favorite name of one is “Rock Star” I don’t drink them.

 
 
Comment by bink
2011-07-19 17:31:16

Relaxation drinks help the body chill out by relieving muscle tension and reducing levels of cortisone, the main stress hormone, according to a report that Martinez wrote about the drinks earlier this year.

The FDA and FTC have been out to lunch for years now. Those sound an awful lot like unproven medical claims to me. I hear commercials that make these BS claims all the time on news radio stations.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-07-19 17:55:49

ALL the consumer watchdog agencies have been consistently gutted over the last 30 years.

Over-regulation stifling business, don’tcha know?

You betcha!

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-20 05:22:05

Yes Bink….but as long as they pay their advertising bill on time it will keep getting aired.

Gotta take whatever steady PAYING clients you can get these days!

——-
I hear commercials that make these BS claims all the time on news radio stations.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 15:30:30

Monroe mattress-pad maker Perfect Fit to lay off 123
charlotteobserver.com

Perfect Fit Industries Inc. of Charlotte, maker of mattress pads and bed pillows, notified the state this week that the company will lay off 123 employees at its manufacturing location in Monroe in September. The layoffs are expected to be permanent. The number of workers at the facility wasn’t available.

The Monroe plant, at 201 Cuthbertson St., was established in the early 1950s. The company recently upgraded the plant through a $2 million investment from its new owners, Michigan-based Anderson Group. The upgrade boosted production capacity to more than 20 million pillows annually. Daniel Hammer, Perfect Fit Industries president and CEO, called Monroe “the pillow capital of the United States” at the ribbon cutting.

Perfect Fit, with its corporate office in Charlotte and other manufacturing facilities in New Hampshire and California, supplies bedding products to Target, Kmart, Bed Bath & Beyond and JCPenney.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-07-19 15:32:04

UMATILLA: Chemical depot closure means job cuts in east Ore.
The Associated Press

Hermiston About 1,000 people will lose their jobs when the Army finishes work at the Umatilla Chemical Depot, and Eastern Oregon is poised to feel the economic fallout.

The East Oregonian reports an Army demilitarization contractor is expected to finish destroying chemical munitions at the depot in November.

After that, security guards, military leaders, clerks and contractors will likely be looking for work.

Oregon State economist Bruce Sorte says the total economic loss will be about $17 million.

Sorte says about 685 jobs will be lost in Umatilla and Morrow counties.

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-07-20 05:25:44

We will be seeing a lot of them here Next year:

http://www.co.umatilla.or.us/deptwebs/jail/roster/alljail.htm

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-07-19 17:40:29

Not being able to be on HBB during the day sucks!

Must.Have.Blog.

 
Comment by Muggy
Comment by bink
2011-07-19 19:50:47

That’s quite some color. Was it a brothel at some point?

Comment by Muggy
2011-07-19 20:06:33

I didn’t say target color! I said, “HOUSE,” man. If it wasn’t a brothel, I’ll make it one.

And good night!

Comment by Robin
2011-07-19 23:15:18

Triple the price if in the OC (not Casey Land)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2011-07-20 00:27:39

Pretty expensive place considering a decade long depression is looming. How about hurricane insurance costs since the warm shallow coast is so near?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-19 23:31:48

I guess so long as you don’t use a gun, bank robbery is destined to remain legal going forward? Heckuva job, Eddie and Joey, and friends!

And — no surprises here — the Republitards have taken the lead in killing financial reform.

Can you even imagine any other industry raising hordes of money to be used in fighting the basic legal protections which most Americans at least used to believe were in place? I can; did you hear the story about that recently-caught Boston-area mob boss who bought off the FBI?

The Billion Dollar Bank Heist

By Gary Rivlin
Newsweek
July 12, 2011

How the financial industry is buying off Washington and killing reform. The only winners seem to be well-paid lobbyists and the legislators who are being showered with campaign dollars.

Freshman GOP Rep. Sean Duffy, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, raised more than $200,000 in his first three months in office. Duffy said then he was still “getting up to speed” on issues like banking “that I didn’t deal with in my entire life.” :-)

There are the bills a president signs sitting in the Oval Office and the bills that merit a Rose Garden ceremony. And then there are bills so momentous—or at least so critical to a president’s reelection prospects—that those around the commander in chief orchestrate a more elaborate ceremony. Such was the case with Dodd-Frank, the financial-reform package that President Obama signed into law last July against a backdrop of velvet curtains in a resplendent venue a few blocks from the White House.

“Passing this bill was no easy task,” Obama told the 400 dignitaries who witnessed the most ambitious overhaul of the financial system since the Great Depression. “We had to overcome the furious lobbying of an array of powerful interest groups and a partisan minority determined to block change.”

The pomp and ceremony may have been premature. Ever since the law’s passage, those same “powerful interest groups” who opposed Dodd-Frank have been trying to prevent it from taking effect. As written, the law delayed implementation of most of its new rules for at least 12 months so regulators would have time to hammer out the finer points of the 2,319-page bill. But that delay has also provided an opening to banks and other financial institutions seeking to defang the law. “Just because we lost that round,” says Cam Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, which spent $1 million in the first three months of this year to lobby against implementation, “doesn’t mean we just give up. Congress changes its mind all the time.”

Take what’s been happening with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is the law’s most significant and controversial provision. The agency is set to go live next week, except that Republicans in the Senate have made it clear they won’t confirm anyone to serve as its head unless the agency is radically scaled back. All told, Dodd-Frank has some 300 provisions, and the bulk of them are under attack by a number of foes, from bankers to check-cashing companies to free-market Republicans.

And so it is, says a discouraged Rep. Barney Frank, that his eponymous bill is “facing a death through a thousand cuts.”

The story of this evisceration is largely one of money—the tens of billions of dollars in profits that banks and other financial institutions stand to lose if Dodd-Frank is implemented, and the astonishing sums they’re spending to squash it. The industry paid lobbyists $1.3 billion in 2009 and through the first three months of 2010, according to the Center for Public Integrity, which added up the spending by the 850 businesses and trade groups fighting financial reform. Many of these same businesses are now spending as much money, if not more, to lobby for curbs on the new law.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-20 00:14:41

The Wall Street Journal
POLITICS
JULY 20, 2011

Obama Backs Latest Bargain
By JANET HOOK, NAFTALI BENDAVID and DAMIAN PALETTA

President Barack Obama, in a last-ditch bid for a bipartisan “grand bargain” on the budget, threw his weight Tuesday behind a $3.7 trillion deficit-reduction plan unveiled by six Republican and Democratic senators.

President Obama backed a $3.7 trillion deficit-reduction plan from the “Gang of Six” as “a very significant step” after it gained fresh momentum from a bipartisan group in the Senate. Nell Henderson has details from Washington.

The plan, which would span a decade, has scant chance of passing intact as the solution to the current debate over raising the government’s borrowing limit. Some Republicans were wary of the plan’s changes in tax rules. Democrats said it would be near impossible to draft legislative language and pass it quickly.

Still, some elements from the so-called Gang of Six senators could be incorporated into a final deal to shrink the deficit and raise the government’s $14.29 trillion debt cap by Aug. 2. That’s when the Treasury Department says the government will run out of cash to pay all its bills without an increase in borrowing authority.

Even House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R.,Va.), one of the party’s most combative conservatives, didn’t dismiss the plan out of hand. “While there are still portions that are unclear and need more detail, this bipartisan plan does seem to include some constructive ideas to deal with our debt.”

The developments come against a backdrop of a dramatic shift in public attitudes toward the debt ceiling. A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found a plurality of Americans—38%—now say the debt ceiling should be raised, while 31% say it shouldn’t. A month ago, sentiment was the reverse, with 39% opposing the idea while just 28% said it should be raised.

Historically, the U.S. has run up deficits during wars and recessions, but then debt has substantially declined.

The senators backing the new proposal say 74% of the deficit reduction would come from spending cuts and 26% from new taxes. It would impose spending cuts and caps, and make changes in Social Security to make the program solvent over 75 years. It would direct congressional committees to reduce the deficit by specific levels in their areas of jurisdiction, likely including major entitlements such as Medicare and Medicaid.

The plan also would make big changes to the tax code. It would lower personal and corporate tax rates, eliminate the unpopular Alternative Minimum Tax and many deductions and tax breaks.

Comparing the Gang of Six plan to current law, which provides that all Bush tax cuts expire in 2012, it would cut taxes by $1.5 trillion over 10 years, making it attractive to some Republicans.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-20 00:20:15

Downgrade could be KO for housing
By JOSH BOAK | 7/19/11 10:34 PM EDT

As the rating agencies have recently made clear, failure to raise the nation’s debt ceiling would threaten more than Social Security checks and interest payments to China.

The chain reaction from a downgrade of the Treasury’s top rating would hit thousands of municipalities, student loan provider Sallie Mae, too-big-to-fail banks and places that have dealt with plagues of truly biblical proportions: Israel ($11.9 billion of U.S. guaranteed debt) and Egypt ($1.25 billion).

But nothing might be more vulnerable than the housing market that spawned the financial crisis three years ago.

Mortgage firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could lose the top-notch ratings made possible through their government conservatorship.

Tucked into Moody’s recent report is a footnote estimating that, without explicit government support, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would have the equivalent of a B2 junk bond grade.

In perspective, the sovereign debt of Sri Lanka, recovering from a 26-year civil war, has a better stand-alone rating. And up until June, so did the dangerously cash-strapped and protest-laden nation of Greece.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-20 00:23:28

Reuters Breakingviews
Time for Action on Freddie and Fannie
By AGNES T. CRANE, GEORGE HAY and PETER THAL LARSEN
Published: July 18, 2011

A year after passage of the Dodd-Frank act, the $10.5 trillion American mortgage market remains in limbo. One big reason is that the law scarcely touches Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration — the government-run lenders that dominate the home loan market.

The consequences of lax mortgage lending were central to the crisis that Dodd-Frank was intended to make unrepeatable. But rather than tackle the huge and highly political issue of Fannie, Freddie and the F.H.A., the law narrowly focused on one part of the market. That’s the private-label mortgage-backed securities area, source of more than $3 trillion of mortgage bonds from 2002 to 2007.

The most significant new rule could require private sector financial institutions to hold at least 5 percent of securities they create by repackaging loans. Giving them some incentive to ensure the securities are creditworthy isn’t a bad idea, but it reinforces the notion that the private sector is at a competitive disadvantage to government lenders if it returns to the mortgage-backed business. That’s because Fannie and other government-run programs would be exempt from this requirement.

The risk retention rule plays into another Dodd-Frank initiative: the creation of standards for safer home loans known as qualified residential mortgages. Such loans, in which the proposal is that homeowners must put 20 percent down, among other criteria, would be exempt from risk retention requirements.

Banks, real estate lobbyists and consumer groups want looser standards because mortgages that don’t qualify could be costlier. That hardly seems catastrophic for borrowers when 30-year mortgage rates are as low as 4.5 percent. But it’s easy to see the point when federally backed housing agencies sometimes allow homeowners to borrow 96.5 percent of the value of their homes.

In short, the reform effort so far seems to make it harder for the private sector to re-establish itself while entrenching the cost, and risk, with taxpayers. Congress and regulators must assess housing finance as one market. Until the future of the hulking government mortgage finance companies is mapped out, the worthy goals of Dodd-Frank don’t mean much.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-20 00:32:56

TheMoneyIllusion
A slightly off-center perspective on monetary problems.
A demographic depression

When I read the newspapers from the 1930s I’d occasionally see hopeful articles about how consumer spending would have to pick up soon, because of all the “pent-up” demand. If people hadn’t been buying cars for a while then presumably their cars would wear out, and this would trigger new demand for replacements. Of course I knew that there actually was no light at the end of the tunnel, which made these articles seem slightly pathetic—as if they were grasping for straws. They overlooked the fact that the depression made America much poorer, and that low consumer demand reflected that poverty. For similar reasons, there isn’t much “pent up demand” for cars in Somalia, despite low sales in recent years.

Sometimes I see this argument applied to the housing slump. Housing construction is down 70%, to levels far lower than at any time in post-war history (relative to population.) And this slump has been going on for a number of years. Surely we’ll soon need to build more houses, to meet our growing population. If only that were true. Unfortunately, as sharply as housing construction has fallen, household formation has fallen even faster.

Jim Glass sent me some very interesting data on household formation, which casts a very different light on the recent housing crash.

By my simple measure recent housing starts peaked with an inventory of 40% of an average year’s worth of starts above the trend line in 2007. That’s a cyclical high but a typical one. About the same or a little higher was reached in three other cycles since 1960.

But the plunge in starts since 2007 is unprecedented — by the end of 2010 cumulative starts were 72% of an average year’s worth of starts below trend. The next-lowest figure was 46% below trend back in 1970. If things were “normal” this would predict a huge boom in housing starts soon.

But housing starts are *following* household formation, which is plunging even faster, like an ICBM heading straight to its target.

In 2007 household formation was 1627k (average 1998-2007: 1499k) and housing starts were 1355k (average 1998-2007: 1716k). In 2010 household formation was all of 357k, down 78% from 2007 and down 76% from the prior ten year average. Housing starts were 587k, down 57% from 2007 and down 66% from the prior ten years. That’s a big fall, but it is still *well behind* the fall in household formation.

If I still had my blog I’d post the graphs — the line for household formation is heading straight down like to the bottom of the sea, it’s three times the fastest-deepest decline of the last 40 years. The line for housing starts looks like it is just striving to not fall too far behind.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that light at the end of the tunnel is an onrushing train called falling household formation. It’s caused by three factors:

1. Less immigration due to the post-2006 crackdown.

2. Less immigration due to the severe recession and high unemployment

3. 20-somethings who can’t get jobs are living with their parents.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-07-20 00:39:02

Did Sister Sledge mean “We are household” instead of “We are family”? Understanding Household Formation
Submitted on June 15, 2011 - 5:33pm

When thinking about the housing sector, we can think about the short, medium, and longer term. In the short-term, we receive a wide variety of indicators, such as the data released today on housing starts and permits (both rose in May and the April data were revised upwards). In the medium-term (say the next year or so), a variety of factors will be at play, including the improving job market. In the longer-term, the key driver will be changes in the numbers of households. Given that “household formation” isn’t often discussed, we thought it might be useful today to go into a little more detail about what is a household and what has recently been happening on the household formation front.

Household Growing Pains

Our statistical agencies define a household as any single person or group of persons residing in a single housing unit. Housing units generally are defined as separate living quarters with direct access. So, a house, apartment, group of rooms, or even a single room intended for occupancy as separate living quarters can be a housing unit. For instance, if you rent out an apartment above your garage (say to someone called “Fonzie”), then the folks who occupy that apartment would be considered a separate household.

What’s happening to the number of households in the U.S.? In first quarter 2011, there were an estimated 112.2 million households in the U.S., but household formation has slowed drastically over the last few years. And though the slowdown in household formation coincided with the recession, as the economic recovery began and strengthened last year, household formation has yet to pick up.

For this slowdown to occur, overall population growth has to slow and/or the number of persons living in the average household has to increase. We have seen a fair amount of the former and a tiny bit of the latter. Between 2007 and 2010, the civilian non-institutional population age 16 and over (younger persons and the institutionalized would not presumably head a household) grew by 2.6 percent, down from the 3.8-percent growth over the three years prior to the recession and, in fact, the slowest growth in over half a century. The slowdown reflects a sharp drop-off in net migration. The foreign-born population age 16 and over increased by 3.3 million persons or 10.2 percent from 2004 to 2007, but just 0.9 million or 2.4 percent from 2007 to 2010. Contrast that with the native-born population, whose growth ticked down from 5.3 million to 5.1 million over those two time periods. Average household size edged up a tad from 2.56 persons per household to 2.59 from 2007 to 2010 after having been essentially unchanged for several years. This slowdown in household formation certainly has not helped the housing industry recover from its woes.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post