August 8, 2011

Bits Bucket for August 8, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

527 Comments »

Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 01:07:49

ECB says it will buy Italian and Spanish debt and gooses worldwide markets. Watched Hong Kong’s market crater crawl back from over 5% down to only 2.03%. Europe’s losses controlled at least at the open.

But wait! Didn’t they do this last week only to reneg because there wasn’t enough money? What happened to TBTBail?

CarrieAnne, 4 am EDT

FRANKFURT (MarketWatch) — The yield on 10-year Italian government bonds plunged 43 basis points on Monday to 5.57%, while the 10-year Spanish yield /quotes/zigman/4869131 ES:10YR_ESP -14.08% dropped nearly 65 basis points to 5.39%, according to FactSet Research data, after the European Central Bank late Sunday indicated it would use its bond-buying program to purchase Italian and Spanish debt. The move is seen as crucial to helping arrest a sharp rise in borrowing costs that has threatened to push Italy, the euro-zone’s third-largest economy, and Spain, its fourth-largest, toward default.

Market Pulse Archives

Aug. 8, 2011, 3:24 a.m. EDT

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/italy-spain-yields-plunge-after-ecb-signals-buys-2011-08-08

Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 07:55:31

Economic policy is meant to shape human economic behavior. The government keeps instituting economic policies which reward destructive economic behavior (encouraging FB’s to catch falling knives to the benefit of the banks with the homebuyer tax credit, rewarding TBTF institutions with massive bailouts resulting in massive executive compensation bonuses).

All of which means, Too Big To Fail will continue, as it has, and will become Too Big To Bail.

 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2011-08-08 02:20:02

Keep over regulating and the good jobs will be forced to Bhopal….

DuPont to yank herbicide blamed for killing trees

DOVER, Del. (AP) — The DuPont Co. is halting sales of a new herbicide that has been blamed in several lawsuits for damaging trees in many parts of the country.

The company sent a letter to distributors on Thursday informing them that Dupont was implementing a voluntary suspension of the sales of Imprelis and working on a product return and refund program.

The letter was sent one day after U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials wrote DuPont with concerns that it may have misbranded the herbicide because label directions and warnings are inadequate to protect non-target plant species, and that DuPont was asserting that study data on Imprelis was confidential business information that should not be disclosed to the public.

“EPA is concerned about the sweeping nature of DuPont’s assertion of confidentiality and is evaluating whether these studies warrant such a claim under the law,” division director Abraham Ferdas wrote DuPont CEO Ellen Kullman.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/DuPont-to-yank-herbicide-apf-593965193.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=6&asset=&ccode=

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-08-08 05:06:12

Those damn communists from the EPA are destroying American jobs. Everybody should have the freedom to spray Agent Orange all over their own n’hood.

Comment by sfrenter
2011-08-08 08:02:47

It’s “over-regulation” until half your town gets cancer. It’s “over-regulation” until someone you love dies from tainted beef. Or you can’t swim in your local lake/beach/river.

“Cut taxes! Small government! Hands-off my medicare!”

 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 05:48:14

If banning the usage of a chemical that kills more than was intended is “over regualtion”, then I am all for over regulation.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 06:42:00

I’d love to know what the electric company is using to kill the small pine trees, and only pine trees, on their high-tension rights-of-way. Also, how do they apply it since pines right over the edge of the right-of-way are untouched as is all the other vegetation on the ROW. Helicopter spraying? I can’t imagine them flying UNDER the lines. Crews in 4WD pickup trucks? Rather remarkable IMO.

Comment by Marko
2011-08-08 21:07:51

I can answer that. The power companies use what is essentially roundup. They spot spray young trees and not just pines. They spray the hardwoods as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 07:56:16

Keep over regulating

“misbranded the herbicide”

DuPont (a SCOTU$ person Inc.) are Profee$$ional & Ethical and would never make such a mi$take do such a thing! ;-)

Moreover, Americans should encourage dangerous chemical manufacturing & “Financial Innovation Inc’$” to places like China & India

 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 07:59:23

I saw a Republican strategist (Alex Castellanos) on Meet The Press this Sunday, who repeated what Jamie Dimon said to him: that too much regulation on the financial markets would be a drag on the economy.

I was darkly amused. Lack of financial regulation blows economic bubbles, which pop, leaving destruction in their wake. We have just seen what a poorly regulated financial industry does, not just to the US, but to the world.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 09:40:46

We have [are] just seeing what a poorly regulated financial indu$try does, not just to the US, but to the world.

“TruePatriotCEO’$™” plead, plead, plead: give u$ a tax repatriation holiday and we’ll bring the money back and start creating Job$! Job$! Job$!…”

Hwy agree$!

(Previous conversation on the HBB with Housing Wizard) ;-)

“…witnesses to the aftermath of the largest credit expansion citizen-individual & Corp-Inc-per$on $elf-indulgence in history”

(Gene Hackman), Unforgiven’s lil’ Bill,… educatin’ Ned Logan (Morgan Freeman): “Now next time eyes whip ya, it won’t be gentle, like before…”

eyes like your 3-D high re$olution glasses HW, it really brings to life: “Mar$ Attacks! in blu-ray

HW:
took peoples eyes off the furthering of destructive Globalism and the gutting of the USA manufacturing base, job base and tax base .Who benefited from the faulty [Toxic] credit [Creation], but the [Mega] $ellers of product$. Add to this the price fixing monopolie$ , such as [Mega]Health care and other [Mega] Industries, lack of proper tariffs, and the [Hurry! Hurry! Hurry!] tendency for the Government to be the fall guy in taking on [Mega] Industries [mal-inve$ted] costs

MegaRetail
MegaChurches
MegaMedicalInc.$
MegaMilitaryIndu$trialComplexInc.$
MegaCruiseShips
MegaMarket$
MegaSuperStar$
MegaWankerBanker$

Bigger, Bigger!,…Faster, Faster!,…Don’t Stop, Don’t Stop!

(Hwy is awaiting the peon-heroes to come and vaporize them with the Straighten up and fly right! ultimate instrument of destruction!)

Power level set to: “Boycott”

Comment by Housing Wizard
2011-08-08 10:22:06

HWY ….The Madhatters and Cheerleaders are spinning and spinning today. Dow down 346 as I write this post .The true state of affairs just doesn’t go away ,

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2011-08-08 02:25:39

Bubble bubble toil and trouble….

Consumer borrowing up in June by most in 4 years
Borrowing jumped $15.5B in June; Americans lean on credit cards and loans as economy struggles

The Federal Reserve said Friday that consumers increased their borrowing by $15.5 billion in June. That’s the largest one-month gain since August 2007. And it is three times the amount that consumers borrowed in May.

The category that measures credit card use increased by $5.2 billion — the most for a single month since March 2008 and only the third gain since the financial crisis. A category that includes auto loans rose by $10.3 billion, the most since February.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Consumer-borrowing-up-in-June-apf-3022205609.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&ccode=

Comment by combotechie
2011-08-08 05:52:45

“… Americans lean on credit cards and loans as economy struggles.”

These people are short of useless, worthless, unbacked, paper fiats and so they are forced to rent these useless, unbacked, paper fiats at some very hefty interest rates. At least those who CAN do this with their credit cards do this.

Those who can’t do this with their credit cards have the opportunity to choose from many of the thousands of payday loan places that are springing up like mushrooms everywhere, and - OMG! - the interest rates these folks have to pay to rent some of these useless, worthless, unbacked paper fiats is out of sight.

But some folks do not have to play this game; These are the folks that have managed to store up some hefty cash reserves.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 06:10:12

or those who simply spend less than they earn.

Comment by combotechie
2011-08-08 06:56:24

That too. But the ones who have been doing this all along got a head start on those who just discovered the wonders offered by living below one’s means.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:20:06

But since every transaction must have a buyer and a seller, it is fundamentally impossible for everyone to be selling more than they buy.

You managed to get your cash reserves becasue someone was willing to go into debt to create the money that you no have.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-08-08 07:07:18

It’s pretty late in the game for households to be relying on borrowing to bridge their income/spending gaps don’t you think? That’s the type of short term reaction one would expect in 2008-9….or…..is what we are seeing now some of the seemingly stronger hands beginning to fold? Another layer getting pulled off the bubble onion.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 10:03:03

A new crop of 99ers?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 10:14:22

Yes to both questions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:18:12

Money does not exist until someone borrows it into existance.

No one can make money by selling more than they buy, until another someone first borrows the money into existance then spends it by buying more than they make.

There can be no net profits (selling more than you buy) unless there is also new net debt (someone buying more than they sell).

Buying and selling must be equal.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 11:25:05

then interest on debt is never borrowed into existence.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by mathguy
2011-08-08 16:34:05

False. You *can* create wealth. Farmers do it every day growing food. Miners do it refining raw ore into base metals. Manufacturers do it taking raw materials and turning them into products. All of these things to the extent that they can be traded for other goods, services, or raw materials are money. However, they are not FIAT money.

Even pigs and chickens are money in a barter economy. This is not a zero sum game as our modern economists would have you believe. Economics works because two people believe they are both getting a better deal when trade happens. A pig farmer can’t use all his pigs due to the law of diminishing returns, nor can the vegetable grower. It’s when the exchange occurs that the diversity increases net wealth in a *non*-zero sum game. The marginal utility of a diverse commodity ownership is higher than the marginal utility of a single commodity ownership, that is why trade and diversification increases net wealth. Don’t start with the doublespeak of debt is wealth.. it’s not.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 09:49:56

Borrowing jumped $15.5B in June; Americans lean on credit cards and loans as economy struggles

Hmmm, this brings up a gripe of mine: I was trying to place an online order this morning. And, wouldn’t ya know it, I could put the item in the shopping cart, log in to my PayPal account, then uh-oh, I can’t finalize my order.

The “finalize order” screen was completely blank. And I had the very same problem yesterday.

So, I called the company.

Sales guy seemed to be quite eager to sell me something. And he said that I first needed to create an account. Well, that sure was news to me because I sure didn’t see a “create account” prompt when I was ordering online.

I told him quite firmly that I’ve been in the website-makin’ field for 16 years and that his company’s online ordering system was broken. I added that his company needed to contact their web developer to get their ordering process fixed so that people can actually use it.

Once said ordering process is fixed, I’ll be happy to buy from that company. But I’m not going to whip out the credit card and order over the phone. I want to pay online. With PayPal.

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-08-08 02:26:34

Just realized my post on housing from the mountains of southern Poland is a bit more complicated. It’s not really bubbly here in a housing bubble sense…because they don’t appear to be selling them to each other. A nice new one is being built next to the 100-200 year old shack and is owned by the same family. The question is where is that new money coming from? The member of the family that’s been working in western Europe the last few years building their bubbly houses?

Speaking of working, these people are physically amazing. They walk everywhere, and do their farm work mostly by hand with some help from a creaky old tractor here and there. A skinny little 19-20yo kid I’ve been working with on some genealogy work here just took third in a local mountain biking competition where he rode 8km with the uphill sections totaling over 2000m vertical in about 24 minutes. I’m sure that some momentum from downhill sections helped but that blows me away.

Comment by 2banana
2011-08-08 05:58:14

because they don’t appear to be selling them to each other.

My experience in Slovakia (just next door) is that there is a huge RE bubble.

The average person earns $500-$1000 per month.

The average flat (not even a SFH) cost about $250,000.

Do the math on that.

Yes - you can have bubble with “equity locusts” from other places. Take a look at Spain.

Comment by SDGreg
2011-08-08 07:40:23

“Yes - you can have bubble with “equity locusts” from other places. Take a look at Spain.”

That’s not news, but it would surprise me if it’s still happening given what’s happening with the economies in many countries in Europe which were home to those equity locusts. Or is it a matter of the building momentum continuing in anticipation of equity locusts that will never come?

It’s my recollection that there were lots of workers from Poland doing the building in Ireland during the bubble, presumably because of lack of jobs in Poland. If jobs/incomes in Poland are limited, it’s hard to believe they’d be building all of those new houses for each other which ties in with Carl’s observation.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 08:36:45

I suppose it depends on how much they saved during their stints outside of Poland. I know a lot of houses get built in Mexico with “remesa” money sent by a family member from the USA.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 09:54:24

Yesterday, I was bicycling with a friend who has a buddy from Nicaragua. He came to the United States (illegally) and worked in the construction trades for three years.

To put it mildly, he wanted no part of staying here, getting on the Pathway to Citizenship (or whatever it’s being called now), and getting naturalized. He couldn’t wait to get back to Nicaragua. He was just here to make some money.

Well, he’s back in Nicaragua now, and guess what. He started a business down there — he’s a mechanic — and things are going quite well.

Multiply this guy’s story by a few million, and you have a trend.

Takeaway for us: Just because they’re here now doesn’t mean they’ll stay. A lot of our illegal immigrants don’t want to be here as much as a lot of us don’t want them here.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:07:36

I think that is the problem - the smart industrious illegal aliens go back. The rest stay in the US.

 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 08:39:26

Dublin had a Polish tv station when I was there almost 4 years ago.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 09:06:08

And weren’t there stories of lots of Irish workers moving to Poland for jobs? Waterford Crystal comes to mind.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 09:13:00

I seem to remember a story about Waterford moving production to Slovakia.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 09:55:53

Anytime I’m in the mall, I poke into Macy’s and turn over their Waterford goblets just to see what non-Irish country is printed on the sticker that particular week. It used to be Ireland, then Poland, then Romania. Now it’s Slovakia?

A friend of mine is loading up on the older Irish pieces from ebay. Evidently young couples don’t want crystal anymore.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:10:27

A friend of mine is loading up on the older Irish pieces from ebay. Evidently young couples don’t want crystal anymore.

If the young ‘uns have to move frequently for jobs, crystal is kind of hard to move.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:14:19

Sorry, it’s Slovenia, not Slovakia. I got my Eastern European geography mixed up.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 12:02:09

It’s like marriages and home furnishing are going downhill at the same time. A young couple with even modest means (or lots of relatives) could begin marriage with nice furniture, china, and crystal which was expected to last the entire 50 years of marriage. Now it’s made-in-china glass from Target and particle-board furniture from IKEA which last just long enough until the next move. The marriages don’t fare much better.

 
 
 
 
Comment by mikeinbend
2011-08-08 07:22:42

6500 feet straight up verically in 24 minutes?? Plus whatever lateral motion? Over 1 mile of vertical climbing? Scratching my head, as my climbs of 1 hour only net me about 600m vert? I am slow; but 270 feet up per minute? That would be like cllimbing the vertical from Bend (4000 ft) to Bachelor(6500 ft) in 12 minutes. Takes most riders well over two hours to accomplish this! Maybe a math boo boo or these guys climb mountains like they are but molehills!

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 07:51:24

Q: How many Polacks does it take to measure a bike race distance correctly?

A: We don’t know, they haven’t done it yet.

Maybe he sat backwards on his bike, rode down the mountain, and fooled everybody.

(All apologies to our Polish friends, but, hey, I grew up in the 70s;-)

Comment by mikeinbend
2011-08-08 08:25:46

Have you heard of the (insert ethnicity here) who swam three quarters of the way across the lake; got tired, and turned around and swam back??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-08-08 08:38:03

I have heard this one; a guy in a country store wagers with a young fellow that he can’t eat a whole barrel of pickles. The young man excuses himself, leaves for over an hour, and upon returning accepts. He then eats all the pickles and wins the bet. While paying up, the first man asks him where he went before and the young man replies, “I wanted to make sure I could do it so I ate another barrel of pickles first.”

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 10:17:37

If we assume the man and the bike together weigh 200 pounds then the man is doing 200 x 270 = 54,000 ft-lbs per minute of work. Divide that by 33,000 (one horsepower = 33,000 ft-lb/minute) and the man is putting out an average of at least 1.63 horsepower for 24 minutes. Sorry, that’s not possible.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 10:45:39

You are only looking at one side of the equation. There was downhill involved as well. Up and down.

1/8 Hp is about what a human can do.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-08-08 12:04:56

I know, that’s what I was thinking, too. But it was explained to me that there was a lot of downhill as well that is not counted. They are counting just the uphill sections and I assume a lot of momentum is carried through some of it. They are definitely NOT ending up at an elevation 2000m higher than the starting point.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mikeinbend
2011-08-08 12:52:29

Let’s just agree that they were hauling aspens(name of local marathon held yesterday; mostly on trail) both up and down the trail and that is impressive!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-08-08 03:03:53

Turbo Tax Timmy: S&P showed terrible judgement

WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says the credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s showed “terrible judgment” in lowering the U.S. government’s credit rating.

Geithner said the agency’s decision showed a “stunning lack of knowledge” about the basic math used to develop the federal budget.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 05:34:16

i just hope the basic math to develop the federal budget is easier than doing your taxes.

 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 05:42:00

Went to a WNBA game last night. Phoenix Mercury vs. Conneticut Sun. It was a very close game, and the refs made some very bad calls against us. They missed a TOTALLY obvious double dribble, called a ball in when the replay clearly showed it had bounced out…

We lost by 1 point.

What did the coach say? “We got screwed by the officiating?”

NOPE. The coach said that it was our fault. Our players had ample oppertunites to win the game despite the bad calls. It was our fault for playing so poorly that a bad call or two could make the difference in the game.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 06:06:28

“they” say obama is keeping him to avoid a confirmation hearing for the new guy.

obama is a true leader.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 06:44:29

That’s Dear Leader to you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 07:12:37

“the basic math”

Lies do come back to bite you. The party line a week ago was that the country was going to default. Where was your math then?

 
Comment by Elanor
2011-08-08 07:39:36

From perusing this morning’s headlines, it doesn’t appear that many leading financial publications agree with Timmy’s assessment of the downgrade.

 
Comment by measton
2011-08-08 08:07:07

My guess is S and P is working with Treasury and global banking cartel.

They want money in risky assets and they don’t want money flowing from Europe to US bonds. If stocks and US treasuries don’t look so good then by comparison EU debt might look a little better.

Seriously where was S and P when the huge tax cuts during a time of war went through, where were they with the Medicare prescription drug plan that forbids medicare to bargain for cheaper drugs?? Where were they during the housing bubble?? The reality is that these rating agencies are propaganda arms not sources of information. You’ll notice that US treasuries have increased in value with the downgrade.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 08:39:46

force rates up without the fed having to do so.

i thought about that this weekend. although i do not think S & P is in on it…just the pawn of the Fed, banksters, and the ruling elite…although the ruling elite could be pawns as well.

 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 09:29:49

The voters showed terrible judgement I am afraid for picking leaders with the terrible judgement of appointing TTT as Secretary of the Treasury.

Terrible judgement seems to be the source of many of the problems of today.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 10:10:36

McCain would have been better?

Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 10:12:20

McCain would have been better?

as if that was the only option….

false choice, anyone??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 10:35:36

Perot and Anderson have done the best of any 3rd party candidates in the last 50 years and didn’t come close to winning. It is not a false choice.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 10:51:42

Was Clinton electable? Would she have done better than Obama? Would a white woman get better cooperation from Republicans than a black man?

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 11:00:07

Perot and Anderson have done the best of any 3rd party candidates in the last 50 years and didn’t come close to winning. It is not a false choice.

They’re all electable. If people didn’t vote like politics was horse racing.

Seriously….absolutely a false choice. It was not McCain or Obama. That’s just the excuse everyone uses to avoid actually voting for someone that represents their interests.

 
Comment by Max Power
2011-08-08 12:55:52

Amen. Polling and the media basically decide who the winner is before anyone even votes. For some crazy reason, people would hold their nose and vote for someone with a chance to win than just vote for the best candidate. It’s bizarre. People treat elections like sports. No one want’s to be stuck cheering for the loser at the end of the game.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 14:02:12

No one want’s to be stuck cheering for the loser at the end of the game.

I proudly do, and proudly still have my “Don’t Blame Me - I Voted For Ron Paul” bumper sticker…

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 15:44:23

For some crazy reason

If you count Ralph Nader as a “crazy reason” then yes, I have every intention of voting for the establishment candidate. The 4300 dead in Iraq will thank me.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 18:22:42

The 4300 dead in Iraq will thank me.

Because they’ll have more company soon?

The dems controlled Congress. They didn’t cut funding and force the president to bring the troops home. The dems controll the white house/Commander In Chief position. They still haven’t brought the troops home.

So which establishment candidate is going to bring the troops home, and what makes you believe they will? Because they really really mean it this time around??

 
 
Comment by michael
2011-08-08 10:28:36

whenever i think of the failed policies of this administration the image of that video with john mccain suggesting that the federal goverment should pay people’s mortgages on the premise that if a home is foreclosed on…it drops the property value for everybody in the neighborhood.

absolute foolishness on both sides of isle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by measton
2011-08-08 11:24:33

We all know McCain’s history with Savings and Loans.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 11:33:45

We all know McCain’s history with Savings and Loans.

Or, as one of my neighbors says, “I used to work for American Continental. I knew what kind of a crook he is.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by Al
2011-08-08 09:38:41

It would be interesting to take the US fiscal situation, drop a bunch of zeroes off it (turn billions into thousands) and see what kind of credit score the US would get. I’m betting it couldn’t get a mortgage to buy a modest condo.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 09:56:33

Senator Sanders says, in essence, why the heck should we listen to S&P now? Where were they four years ago?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 03:39:40

The “terrible” judgement they showed was waiting so long!

ITEM: Geithner attacks S&P for terrible judgment in downgrading government credit rating

WASHINGTON (AP) — The credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s showed “terrible judgment” in lowering the U.S. government’s credit rating, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Sunday.

“They’ve handled themselves very poorly. And they’ve shown a stunning lack of knowledge about the basic U.S. fiscal budget math,” Geithner said in his first public comments about the credit rating decision.

Interviewed on CNBC, Geither said that U.S. Treasury securities were just as safe now as they were before S&P announced its downgrade. He predicted that China and investors would remain strong purchasers of U.S. government debt.

Republicans have blamed President Barack Obama for the first-ever downgrade of the government’s credit rating.

But Geithner said Congress owns the credit rating because the Constitution gives Congress the power to tax and spend.

Late Friday, S&P announced it was lowering its rating for U.S. debt one notch from AAA to AA+.

Comment by salinasron
2011-08-08 05:16:15

” He predicted that China and investors would remain strong purchasers of U.S. government debt.”

Timmy old boy, if that’s what your crystal ball tells you and you believe it, why protest? Just wipe those tears and get back to spending, your retirement is in the bag.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 06:02:07

Did Geithner ever say exactly what math the S&P didn’t get right? I’ve checked several news stories and can’t find a follow up question or answer.

Here is the “overview” of the S&P downgrade:

The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics.
· More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
· Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government’s debt dynamics any time soon.

The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to ‘AA’ within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.”

Full S&P report here (8 pages or so):

http://tinyurl.com/44xrv4f

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 06:57:23

In other words, it is going to be difficult to get austarity as a mix of tax increases and spending cuts, past our polarized political system

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 08:43:07

The down grade was all out revenue ( or lack there of ).

That has not made it to MSM.

Comment by CrackerJim
2011-08-08 12:41:01

“The down grade was all out revenue ( or lack there of ). ”

That is not what S&P say.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 06:33:06

Unless we change policy and probably personnel soon, we will lost our reserve currency status which will be a much greater problem by a couple of orders of magnitude.

BTW, here is a link to the Coptic Christian attacks in Egypt: http://global-security-news.com/2011/05/27/islamists-target-egypt%e2%80%99s-christians/

In a response to my earlier post someone said that my views were retarded, what has been retarded is political development in Islamic nations due to Islam, As long as the majority of people believe there should be a death penalty for converting from Islam, democracy is neither possible or even desirable. Any U.S. government policy that promotes it is hopelessly naive and a waste of treasure and blood. Iran was better off under the Shah despite him being a corrupt despot.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 06:38:29

BTW check out this pew poll:

http://pewglobal.org/2010/12/02/muslims-around-the-world-divided-on-hamas-and-hezbollah/

75% in Egypt favor the death penalty for conversion from Islam. Do you really think democracy is going to work out well?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-08-08 06:57:42

‘Just days after the Egyptian protesters attacked the state’s internal security headquarters and rescued reems of documents about Mubarak-era crimes that were about to be destroyed, some of the dirtiest such deeds are starting to come to light. And even for the notorious Mubarak regime, they’re surprisingly bad.’

‘Sex tapes, documents detailing broad surveillance of Egyptian dissidents and transcripts of telephone conversations between the dissenters and their family members, sure, but the biggest of what has come out so far reveals something far worse: official government involvement in the Alexandria church bombing and in a 2005 resort bombing.’

‘Its the sort of allegation that would normally seem too extreme to have any credibility, but they’re detailed in official documents as absolute facts. The Sharm al-Sheikh terrorist attacks of July 2005 were blamed on local Bedouins, but the documents instead reveal they were plotted by Interior Minister Habib el-Adly to target a business rival of Hosni Mubarak’s son Gamal.’

‘That and the New Years Eve attack on the Coptic Church in Alexandria, which many were already speculating was an inside job (pointing to the lack of government interest in investigating a major attack) both appear to now be confirmed, at least assuming the documents are authentic (and all indications are that they are). The revelations will likely spark another call to move legally against regime leaders for their crimes.’

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 07:10:35

Oh yeah. Obama’s great diplomatic failure was in not propping this guy up. RIGHT…..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 07:19:41

See my post above and I do find it interesting that many documents were destroyed by the internal security but not those. Ben , what is the source of your post if you do not mind me asking?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-08-08 07:38:17

I put the link in there, which links to other articles. I looked it up when you mentioned the Copts, and recalled this report. Govts get nervous when information surfaces about this stuff:

‘False flag (aka Black Flag) operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.[citation needed] The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time.’

‘In the 1931 Mukden incident, Japanese officers fabricated a pretext for annexing Manchuria by blowing up a section of railway. Six years later they falsely claimed the kidnapping of one of their soldiers in the Marco Polo Bridge Incident as an excuse to invade China proper.[citation needed]‘

‘In the Gleiwitz incident on August 31, 1939, Reinhard Heydrich made use of fabricated evidence of a Polish attack against Germany to mobilize German public opinion and to fabricate a false justification for a war with Poland. This, along with other false flag operations in Operation Himmler, would be used to mobilize support from the German population for the start of World War II in Europe.[citation needed]‘

‘On November 26, 1939, the Soviet Union shelled the Russian village of Mainila near the Finnish border. The Soviet Union attacked Finland four days afterwards, claiming the shelling to have been a Finnish military action. Russia subsequently agreed that the attack was initiated by the Soviets.[8] Also, the nearest Finnish artillery pieces were well out of range of Mainila.[9]‘

‘In 1953, the U.S. and British-orchestrated Operation Ajax used “false-flag” and propaganda operations against the formerly democratically elected leader of Iran, Mohammed Mosaddeq. Information regarding the CIA-sponsored coup d’etat has been largely declassified and is available in the CIA archives.[10]‘

‘The planned, but never executed, 1962 Operation Northwoods plot by the U.S. Department of Defense for a war with Cuba involved scenarios such as fabricating the hijacking or shooting down passenger and military planes, sinking a U.S. ship in the vicinity of Cuba, burning crops, sinking a boat filled with Cuban refugees, attacks by alleged Cuban infiltrators inside the United States, and harassment of U.S. aircraft and shipping and the destruction of aerial drones by aircraft disguised as Cuban MiGs. These actions would be blamed on Cuba, and would be a pretext for an invasion of Cuba and the overthrow of Fidel Castro’s communist government. It was authored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy. This later came to light through the Freedom of Information Act.’

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 07:39:02

new dot antiwar dot com. Ben linked it.

 
Comment by measton
2011-08-08 08:19:06

Don’t forget 9/11.

The neocon white papers said we will need another Pearl Harbor to invade Iraq, and they got it???

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 09:27:21

‘They planned, but never executed,…It was authored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

Ha, Dick Cheney selected a different option when he was vPOTUS. He musta found those dusty old war-plan documents hidden on the top shelf under the large print edition of War & Peace! :-)

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-08-08 10:56:37

There was a chance to ask some tough questions in 2002-3. As bad as what is happening today might seem, I’d argue 2002-3 was a darker time. At least now there’s a debate of sorts whereas 2002-3 was a collective headlong rush to prove one’s “patriotism”.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 07:17:10

Mubarak clearly broke bad and in my posts in February, I did say that he needed to go but that does not mean that democracy is going to be good for Egypt. The Islamists’ attacks on the Copts is well documented over decades.

The army taking over control of Egypt and retaining power is probably the best of the bad options we have there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-08-08 07:31:08

‘the best of the bad options we have there’

Options we have? The US govt uses bribes, torture, assassinations, whatever, to manipulate the lives of millions of people, and still thinks it can shrug off decades of wrongs and move on to the next best “option”.

Now it’s tied down in the graveyard of empires, assuming it can succeed where the Greeks, Romans, British and Russians failed. The US empire has gone the way of all empires; bankrupted by its conquests and hubris.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2011-08-08 07:49:19

“The US empire has gone the way of all empires; bankrupted by its conquests and hubris.”

Interestingly, those most often arguing for the deepest spending cuts want to exempt the military from those cuts.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 08:46:26

The torture compounds in Egypt were heavily used by the CIA to extract information from Al Qada and one innocent Canadian.

Luckily, those documents were destroyed.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:01:18

The torture compounds in Egypt were heavily used by the CIA to extract information from Al Qada and one innocent Canadian.

I just finished reading the book The Interrogator. It’s by a former CIA interrogator. He spent some time at one of the CIA’s black sites. To put it mildly, he didn’t think that the “enhanced” techniques did much good. The amount of intel they produced was miniscule.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 10:31:19

“Interestingly, those most often arguing for the deepest spending cuts want to exempt the military from those cuts.”

I talked with one of these folks last weekend. He has completely bought into the idea that if we fight them over there, we won’t have to fight them here.

Although he believes if we simply cut federal workers to the level they were at in 2008, we can eliminate the deficit in 15 years. I am not sure where he is getting that idea.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 10:56:36

Moslem brotherhood hijacking the movement in Egypt just like the Islamists took over Iran:
http://english.freecopts.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1300&Itemid=9

Islam will be satisfied with nothing less than world conquest and that has been at war with the West and every non-Muslim country practically since its conception. Europe has been invaded numerous times by Muslims and Muslim pirates attacked U.S. ships two hundred years ago when we had no empire. The Crusades were a reaction to Muslim aggression not the cause. People can put their heads in the sand just like they did about our deficits but Islamic expansion is not in our best interest. Even Bill Mayer understands it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 09:58:32

ITEM: Geithner attacks S&P for terrible judgment in downgrading government credit rating

I think that Geithner realizes that his job is in jeopardy. The headlines may not say so, but somewhere, there’s a pirate ship constructing a plank with Timmy’s name on it.

 
Comment by Space Case
2011-08-08 14:36:48

AA+ is hardly at the junk level. This is all so overblown.

 
 
Comment by cereal
2011-08-08 03:53:58

QE3 this week?

Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 03:55:49

To soon, IMO, however you never know with the fools we have in charge of our “best interests”. I’m loving every minute of it!

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-08-08 04:20:42

Yeah might as well make all the small people suffer….I’m still looking out my window at a view of Manhattan waiting to see if any of that QE1 or QE2 money will be delivered today.

 
Comment by michael
2011-08-08 04:49:42

I’m waiting for Q Pentium.

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 04:58:10

I say no. Bond yields are already ridiculously low. Gas and food are still ridiculously expensive. The blame has already been put on the FED for these conditions. I believe Bernanke was bluffing when he said he would do more QE.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 07:23:45

I suspect the markets will have to crash far enough so there is a loud, desperate clamoring on Wall Street for QE3 before the Fed goes there.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 08:41:34

So how low will it have to go? Is Dow below 10K low enough? Or does it need to go lower?

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 10:01:40

Not sure how useful this is, but it seems like the market dipped to about DJIA = 6K before the March 2009 edition of QE was rolled out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 12:14:20

Palmetto says 8000. I’m guessing a little higher - 8500 to 9000. Too many people waiting for the market to drop, and get back in (yours truly included). If you stack the cash in a high enough pile, it will stop the falling knife before it hits its natural bottom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 08:02:52

Devaluing the currency, and causing a loss of faith in the currency, would be the greatest blunder of all. That would get Americans out into the streets.

The policy makers are trying to protect the financial industry through this deleveraging. The public is already paying for the deleveraging. It’s time to stop devaluing the currency and stealing from the public (isn’t an intentional currency devaluation a stealth tax? Doesn’t Congress need to act on that sort of thing?) to make the financial industry whole.

Comment by measton
2011-08-08 08:27:44

Devaluing the currency, and causing a loss of faith in the currency, would be the greatest blunder of all. That would get Americans out into the streets.

It would however put more Americans back to work. The reality is that if we are going to have free global trade then having a strong middle class is going to be a handycap. We need slave labor that won’t purchase anything other than food made here in the USA. The elite have decided to cut the middle class off.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 08:48:45

LOL! Like Americans are going to flood into the streets and demand less spending and more taxes.

A devalued dollar is already happening.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 03:54:03

Au @ $1700.00 can’t wait to hear the same old voices howl “bubble” They don’t get it, can’t get it and will never get it! They just can’t understand why it’s happening, this ain’t the 80’s. I’ll carry on laughing when it crosses the $2000.00 mark. While the decade+ old bubble callers try and convince themselves over and over that gold is a fools investment/insurance policy.

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-08-08 05:10:55

Yeah, some old, same old, housing has hit bottom yet again and gold is in its usual bubble. Better flee into the security of PIIGS sovereign debt.

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2011-08-08 05:35:55

I’m glad I have some exposure to precious metals in my portfolio. I haven’t run the numbers in a while, but I have noticed on the volatile (down) days in the equity markets that the metals holdings tend to go up.

Today will probably be a very *interesting* day in the financial markets.

Comment by rusty
2011-08-08 06:00:03

shhhh wmbz, don’t let the secret out to the unwashed masses yet. Buy more while it is still cheap and then hang on when the massive bubble finally does hit. Don’t be greedy, sell when made a profit and let someone else hold the bag and catch the falling knives.

Still not sure what the next safe haven will be. I am so burned on real-estate I can’t get excited about that very much.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 07:24:53

I’ll laugh in due time when the gold bubble pops (albeit maybe after it hits $2000/oz). Too many too-clever-by-half buyers are snapping it up now, including central bankers!

Comment by sfrenter
2011-08-08 08:15:35

It was already a bubble by the time the AM radio stations started advertising “buy gold” commercials every 30 minutes. That was at least a year ago, maybe two.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 10:03:09

That’s just it: Everyone and his dog knows that gold is the place to park your money to keep it safe from the evil bankers. Once a mania is this widespread, it’s just a matter of time before it’s over.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 15:08:45

Once interest rates start to rise (in other words, no more QEs) then gold will drop.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 08:25:13

“this ain’t the 80’s”

So true, as far as slogans go. The debt expansion mania is over for the majority of Americans. It wasn’t in the 80s. Just how backwater our FedGov is has proven amazing. Five years after the housing bubble blew out and maybe now there is some recognition. I believe Pelosi was right in a sense, if FedGov lets the great credit expansion stop, life, as they know it in DC and on Wall Street, will cease. Should that come to pass, there will be a painful pinch for speculators who are all in.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 09:11:17

Should that come to pass, there will be a painful pinch for $peculators who are all in.

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

an example of immediate “di$tributional pain medicine” that relieves the the Wealthie$ of their throbbing “no tax increase” ailment$

The “TrueGridLok$editionist’s™” wee-peeParty tea toadlers have a measuring $poon for proper do$age. ;-)

 
 
Comment by peter a
2011-08-08 09:09:59

Aladinsain where are you?

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 10:05:28

Last we heard, he was in Sane.

My personal bet is that he went back to the monastery in the mountains of Mexico and swore an oath of poverty.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 03:57:56

The next housing shock
(CBS News)

Home prices have been falling for months, sending us into a second housing shock. Home values are almost down to what they were back in 2002. A key factor bringing down prices - and holding back the recovery - is the huge number of foreclosed houses.

Many of them are stuck on the market for a reason that you wouldn’t expect: banks can’t find the ownership documents. It’s bizarre, but it turns out that Wall Street cut corners when it created those mortgage-backed investments that triggered the financial collapse.

As we reported earlier this year, now that banks want to evict people, they’re discovering that often the legal documents behind the mortgages simply aren’t there. Caught in a jam of their own making, some companies appear to be resorting to forgery and phony paperwork to throw people, down on their luck, out of their homes.

Who really owns your mortgage?

Scott Pelley explains a bizarre aftershock of the U.S. financial collapse: An epidemic of forged and missing mortgage documents.

In the 1930s we had breadlines; venture out before dawn in America today and you’ll find mortgage lines. This past January in Los Angeles, 37,000 homeowners facing foreclosure showed up to an event to beg their bank for lower payments on their mortgage. Some people even slept on the sidewalk to get in line.

So many in the country are desperate now that they have to meet in convention centers coast to coast.

In February in Miami, 12,000 people showed up to a similar event. The line went down the block and doubled back twice.

Dale DeFreitas lost her job and now fears her home is next. “It’s very emotional because I just think about it. I don’t wanna lose my home. I really don’t,” she told “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley.

“It’s your American dream,” he remarked.

“It was. And still is,” she replied.

These convention center events are put on by the non-profit Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, which helps people figure what they can afford, and then walks them across the hall to bank representatives to ask for lower payments. More than half will get their mortgages adjusted, but the rest discover that they just can’t keep their home.

For many that’s when the real surprise comes in: these same banks have fouled up all of their own paperwork to a historic degree.

“In my mind this is an absolute, intentional fraud,” Lynn Szymoniak, who is fighting foreclosure, told Pelley.

While trying to save her house, she discovered something we did not know: back when Wall Street was using algorithms and computers to engineer those disastrous mortgage-backed securities, it appears they didn’t want old fashioned paperwork slowing down the profits.

“This was back when it was a white hot fevered pitch to move as many of these as possible,” Pelley remarked.

“Exactly. When you could make a whole lotta money through securitization. And every other aspect of it could be done electronically, you know, key strokes. This was the only piece where somebody was supposed to actually go get documents, transfer the documents from one entity to the other. And it looks very much like they just eliminated that stuff all together,” Szymoniak said.

Szymoniak’s mortgage had been bundled with thousands of others into one of those Wall Street securities traded from investor to investor. When the bank took her to court, it first said it had lost her documents, including the critical assignment of mortgage which transfers ownership. But then, there was a courthouse surprise.

“They found all of your paperwork more than a year after they initially said that they had lost it?” Pelley asked.

“Yes,” she replied.

Asked if that seemed suspicious to her, Szymoniak said, “Yes, absolutely. What do you imagine? It fell behind the file cabinet? Where was all of this? ‘We had it, we own it, we lost it.’ And then more recently, everyone is coming in saying, ‘Hey we found it. Isn’t that wonderful?’”

But what the bank may not have known is that Szymoniak is a lawyer and fraud investigator with a specialty in forged documents. She has trained FBI agents.

Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 05:24:19

If it weren’t for food stamps (1939), we would have breadlines 45 million people long. Of course they don’t want that on the news.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 05:46:23

Exactly.

Go back to reporting unemployment the way we did in 1937, push all those people that haven’t made a payment in 2 years of their houses, then get rid of food stamps and replace them with breadlines, and it would be obvious to all that we are in depression.

 
Comment by combotechie
2011-08-08 05:57:41

In a sense food stamps ARE bread lines.

Comment by measton
2011-08-08 08:30:56

food stamps aren’t bread lines

That’s just it, you don’t see the long line of poor looking people, many your neighbors who have fallen on hard times. The poverty is hidden to keep the masses from demanding action and to keep them from pulling their heads into a shell which would cut off all spending.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 08:44:35

They’re virtual breadlines, designed to keep the problem hidden, which is why they’ve switched from coupons to debit cards.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 08:50:38

The switch was more to do with reducing fraud and lowering costs then hiding anything.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-08-08 09:09:33

Right Steve it used to be common knowledge you could buy a candy bar or chewing gum for a quarter give then $1 coupon get back 75 cents change and then go buy a beer….or doing it twice and then buying a pack of cigarettes in SC with super low taxes

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 10:03:46

Wiki has a very good write-up on the history of food stamps.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 10:32:13

The switch was also about “privatizing” more government in the name of “efficiency” which only really meant a captured market for the banks who actually administer SNAP.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:22:02

SNAP is administered by the Dept of Agriculture. I don’t think the really have the ability to do it all in house.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 13:20:30

Food stamps were originally run in-house by the government. After a bunch of cuts and additions in the 80’s and 90’s, they changed it to SNAP and put it on EBT cards, administered by a contractor. They found a way to put other welfare money on the cards too, hence the midnight lines at Wal-Mart.

—————
An interesting side note:

The 2008 Farm Bill established HIP, the healthy incentives program, now in pilot stages for part of the SNAP population. Wiki: “HIP offers select SNAP recipients a 30% subsidy on produce… Produce, under the HIP, is defined as fresh, frozen, canned, or dried fruits and vegetables that do not have any added sugar, salt, fat, or oil.”

Bolding is mine. In other words, canned fruit with “no sugar added” is 30% off on SNAP.

Very recently, in the canned fruit aisle in Giant I saw a LOT of canned peaches and pears and pinapple which say in very bold print: “NO SUGAR ADDED.” The canned fruit is stuffed with sucralose (Splenda). At first I thought they were catering to healthy-minded moms, but nope. Big Ag read the new law, and is now peddling Splenda-laced food to poor moms, at 30% off.

I hope sucralose doesn’t cause cancer or something…

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 17:23:35

The checkout girl at the supermarket yesterday said “debit, credit, or EBT?”

Never would have heard that a couple years ago.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-08-08 06:02:06

But what the bank may not have known is that Szymoniak is a lawyer and fraud investigator with a specialty in forged documents. She has trained FBI agents.

First question:

Have you made your mortgage payments? Can you show us the cancelled checks?

Oh - so this is really a something for nothing game. The FBI has a word for that…

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 07:12:21

default?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 05:43:22

“But what the bank may not have known is that Szymoniak is a lawyer and fraud investigator with a specialty in forged documents. She has trained FBI agents.”

Is taking cash out refis that you never planned to pay back to the tune of $600k fraud or just an honest mistake? Check yesterdays Bits for the public records of Lynn Szymoniak.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 06:04:56

What did she do that was illegal?

Comment by Kirisdad
2011-08-08 06:24:53

She didn’t do anything illegal. But, she should be ridiculed for going on national TV and portraying herself as a victim.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 06:55:07

“She didn’t do anything illegal”

Exactly. So there’s really no moral equivalence between what she did and the banks forging documentation and engaging in fraud, as much as some seem to think there is.

“she should be ridiculed for going on national TV and portraying herself as a victim.”

I’m fine with that. As long as people don’t use her flakiness to somehow justify the banks’ forgery and fraud, as some seem prepared to do.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 07:45:05

“She didn’t do anything illegal”

“Exactly. So there’s really no moral equivalence between what she did and the banks forging documentation and engaging in fraud, as much as some seem to think there is.”

Too bad there is no Robo signing with credit cards. Then everyone (with good credit anyway) could run up hundreds of thousands of $ that they never intended to pay back (which wouldn`t be illegal) buy all kinds of stuff and go on vacations stop paying the minimum right after you maxed out, keep the cars, furniture, TVs and inground pools. Then, go on 60 minutes and say….

Who really owns my credit card debt?

Scott Pelley explains a bizarre aftershock of the U.S. financial collapse: An epidemic of forged and missing credit card documents.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2011-08-08 10:40:42

I would have to look at her loan documents and loan applications to determine if she did anything questionable ,

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 12:13:30

Type in SZYMONIAK LYNN E and see what you can find.

http://www.mypalmbeachclerk.com/OrisSearch - 43k -

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 14:51:43

Szymoniak is an unsympathetic character.

But if we let banks get by with fraudulent paperwork (e.g. re-creating it after its loss), what is to prevent them from manufacturing paperwork to take any house they want?

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 17:43:17

They can have this one, my LL doesn`t pay the mortgage anyway.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 06:05:40

By the way, how did the bank “find” the papework for all these refi’s and not for the actual house? Hmmmm….

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 05:54:44

Here is the last of many cash out refis by “Honest Lynn” Szymoniak along with the LP filed a couple of years after she stopped paying.

Date/Time: 2/15/2006 08:27:13
Consideration: $780,000.00
Party 1: SZYMONIAK LYNN E
Party 2: OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Legal: HORSHOE AC W. RPL B5 L12 BL

Type: LP
Date/Time: 8/6/2008 16:00:12
CFN: 20080293601
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 22796/1110
Pages: 1
Consideration: $0.00
Party 1: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE
Party 2: SZYMONIAK LYNN E
DOE JANE
DOE JOHN
SZYMONIAK SPOUSE
Legal: HORSHOE AC W. RPL B5 L12 BL

Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 08:22:33

Gotta ask yourself one question: “Why wouldn’t a lender care about being repaid?”

In the answer to that question lies the cause of the global financial crisis.

And that answer is, “Lenders did not have to bear repayment risk.” They made their profit through sale of the debt. So, what do they care if it gets repaid or not? That’s how people keep lending over and over to Ms. Szymoniak.

The real fault here lies first with politicians, and then with the regulators they defanged, to the delight of Wall Street.

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 06:02:35

” Caught in a jam of their own making, some companies appear to be resorting to forgery and phony paperwork to throw people, down on their luck, out of their homes.”

Ahem. Just as I predicted. Robo-signing wasn’t about cutting corners in haste. It was about having unknowing underlings (oops- I mean ‘robots’) sign the fraudulent papers, because those in the know didn’t want to do it.

Next, we’ll see how easy it is to fix. Prediction: not easy.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 07:00:07

“Ahem.”

Do you spit after you do that?

Comment by mikeinbend
2011-08-08 08:02:26

but what is fair and equitable for both. asking for pie in the sky free houses is unreasonable. asking owners that are being foreclosed upon for not making payments to look the other way (as the bank has jeopardized its own ability to legally evict by making egregious errors and compensating by fabricating lost documents) is also unreasonable.

The AG’s are having a field day; in Washington state, the AG claims that Recontrust has been in legal violation in its foreclosure actions taken against some 10k borrowers.

so they stand to receive some 2k or something to admit that the bank owns the house.

How can this be fairly resolved so people like us can walk; having been given a fair shake by the bank. Including a chance to refi if it is appropriate.

Denying they received FedEx documents is not a fair way of doing business. Denying modifications on borrowers who fit the HAMP profile is wrong; so who is blaming borrowers by trying to make the bank cross its t’s because they certainly have to.

So we are asking for reproduction of original note, and contact information for all the servicers that have handled our loans. they are obliged to do this befoe repossession of house. If it means pushing back the foreclosure for awhile more so be it.

They should not be allowed to operate above the law when borrowers are not, and those who played by the rules and followed govt guidelines being jerked around deserve to be able to cry foul and have their voices heard.

Free houses….NOT. Due process on every one of the millions of foreclosures may even bring a few offshored jobs home as Linda Green signers and the notaries that verified her signatures were acting for the banks but in an illegal way. they need to sort this out while the deadbeats sit in their homes mortgage free.

A side effect of their unfair practices. We have not paid in a year and a half, but are asking for the bank to produce our note in a stalling tactic; because it will benefit noone but the bank when eviction occurs and our house sits empty and falls into disrepair in our absence.

we need to pay market rent on a house (we will offer the new owners a fair market rent if they want to collect money on this home while they sell it. If they take the time to look, they will see it is well taken care of. We may move into my paid in full “retirement” home and operate without that rental income. too bad for us, good for the bank. Just want their ducks to be in a row before they start shooting recklessly!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 08:06:31

Yep. I hock a loogie in honor of the banksters and their brilliant deregulation schemes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 08:11:11

“Yep. I hock a loogie in honor of the banksters and their brilliant deregulation schemes.”

OUTSTANDING! :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 07:26:05

“It’s bizarre, but it turns out that Wall Street cut corners when it created those mortgage-backed investments that triggered the financial collapse.”

Isn’t that a blatant case of FRAUD!? Where are the perp walks!!?

Comment by SDGreg
2011-08-08 08:00:12

It’s not bizarre at all, for then. The business model was fraud, to the core.

As far as the the lack of perp walks, I suspect some day we’ll find out it’s one of a couple of things or a combination of the two:

- Eric Holder is a total corporate tool.

- There are so many GWB hack holdovers in DOJ and/or so many Obama appointees have been held up by the Republicans that the DOJ has been effectively neutered.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:09:18

Wasn’t the DOJ one of the biggest roadblocks to the Watergate investigation?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 10:11:06

- There are so many GWB hack holdovers in DOJ and/or so many Obama appointees have been held up by the Republicans that the DOJ has been effectively neutered.

Seriously? It’s all the pubs fault and the dems would absolutely do the right thing if only they were given the chance???

Are you really that naive? BOTH parties are toothless. Both are corporate/banker tools. Have you really not looked at Obama’s cabinet?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 10:40:28

Most of us here are NOT thrilled with O’s cabinet, but niether him nor his cabinet were responsbile for the actions of 30 years of business deregulation that was, and STILL is, the Repubs ONLY agenda, the linchpins of which were SOLEY authored and sponsored by Repubs.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 11:03:24

but niether him nor his cabinet were responsbile for the actions of 30 years of business deregulation

Who said anything about regulation/deregulation? You’re arguing off-topic again.

The implication was that there have been no perp walks due to republican stonewalling/cabinet members. The presumption here is the law was broken…regulation isn’t relevant in this context.

 
Comment by measton
2011-08-08 11:42:31

Clinton was in there as well.
NAFTA
Glass Steagle etc

 
 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-08-08 07:36:01

Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America

I’ve read mixed reviews of these guys. It seems the docs to seal the deal with the banks (decision maker for the lender), aren’t done at these events, and many deals have fallen through. Months later, those who waited in line are still dealing with a nightmare.

On their website, they have a video of all these happy homemoaners, but there is no follow up video of the failures. Happy turns to where’s my mod, I just did an infomercial for them.

Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 07:48:14

I have noticed a distinct lack of follow-up on ANYTHING in today’s journalism. Only PBS seems to go back to the same people they interviwed and do follow-up stories.

Example: In 2005 or so, PBS Now (heavily liberal, no longer on the air) showed a Hispanic Re-al-TOR helping his Hispanic neighbors to achieve the American Dream. In one segment, a middle-age man does a five-minute walk through of a McMansionish house in California and said in Spanish si, he would like to buy it. The re-al-TOR whips out his phone and does the deal there and then on the sidewalk. The families hailed him as a genius and loved him like a brother.

A couple years later, NOW went back to the same re-al-TOR for a follow up. The realtor said that all those families were now foreclosing and were looking to their realtor for “help” and to take care of them, but the realtor cuts them off. He can’t help them now.

Sad endings. Maybe that’s why they don’t do follow ups?

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:06:23

Here in Tucson, our daily fishwrap is reporting that bailed-out banksters are snapping up tax liens. Needless to say, the locals aren’t happy.

Excerpt from the fishwrap story: Although the primary goal of the $700 billion bailout was to prop up struggling banks stung by the mortgage crisis, the government has criticized banks that took bailout money for not doing enough to help customers stay in their homes. In June, the U.S. Treasury Department withheld an estimated $24 million in combined monthly incentive payments from three - Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo - for not doing enough to help homeowners, and it could do the same for July. All three are among the biggest buyers of tax liens in Arizona.

Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 13:28:25

Measton and Alpha-sloth get another one right! They predicted this a year ago. Go bankrupt, let their crap fall in price, get bailout, use the money to snap up their own crap at pennies on the dollar, use rest of bailout to flip for a(nother) profit.

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 04:15:57

Here’s an article on the Mercedes Benz dealership expansion V tried to tell me I was making up:

Romano brothers expand Fayetteville dealership to suit Mercedes Benz

Fayetteville, NY — A decade after moving their Mercedes-Benz dealership from Syracuse’s West Side to Fayetteville, brothers Michael and Joe Romano have finished renovating the shop to suit the German carmaker’s standards.

Everything from the tiles on the floor to the furniture in the offices to the tool boxes in the service bays matches Mercedes specifications. Pointing to the ceiling, Michael Romano says, “every light fixture in this place has been changed to Mercedes-Benz standard.”

The renovations cost “over seven figures,” he said.

The new tool boxes alone cost $68,000, Joe Romano said.

Mercedes wants its dealerships to match, to give customers a higher level of experience, the two said. So they complied, expanding the dealership toward the front with a glass-front showroom. The color schemes in the showroom, the service waiting room and the offices are muted, chosen from a Mercedes-approved palette.

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/08/romano_brothers_expand_fayette.html

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 05:13:36

So what does this mean to you?

Comment by 2banana
2011-08-08 06:03:25

So what does this mean to you?

$500 to replace the front brake pads…?

Comment by pdmseatac
2011-08-08 06:57:15

A co-worker of mine has an audi. Having the brake pads replaced was over $3,000. He was b!tching about it a few years back. The car has a dash light that comes on when the brakes need servicing so it was impossible to ignore.

I have had only Japanese compacts or American heavy metal. A similar brake job might cost about $200 ( or at least it did back when I still owned cars ).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by redrum
2011-08-08 07:49:04

We have a ‘05 Land Rover. A similar light came on, indicating time for new pads (I knew they were thin). Dealer wanted over $800 to replace them. Generic replacement parts were around $100. Took me a couple of hours in the garage, listening to music, taking a break now and then to sip on a cold one. There was one uncommon socket I needed (17mm 12 point I think) to get the front calipers free from the upright- my neighbor had one I could borrow.

This is a very basic maintenance job that most car owners should be capable of doing. $700 savings should be motivation enough. Yeah, you’re going to get a little dirty-

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 08:48:22

So you can’t take your Kraut mobile to Brakes-Plus?

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 16:11:30

Sorry redrum, this is not windshield wiper fluid. I am NOT replacing my own brakes…

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 08:03:53

Well yeah. That’s the obvious. I’m waiting for Carrie to make her point.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 11:38:43

My point was the post where I referred to this expansion was the one where V went nuts on me calling me a complete fake.

What kind of point were you waiting for?

I am on and off this site due to my schedule. I’d like to be more conversational and I think you can tell the days when I’m able to hang by the computer more but pretty much on most days I throw out what hits my mind as interesting to see if anyone else thinks it is. Other than that I don’t sit around staking out my point. Mostly cause I don’t do argueing that well. For me personally it seems like a huge waste of time. So I guess you can say my biggest “point” is my family’s survival. And other than that everyone here can go in the exact opporsite direction if that works for them. Isn’t that what it’s about for most of us (including the majority which are lurkers)? Where’re all just trying to survive this. Whether you can quote me in 10 years or not is of little consequence to me.

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 11:30:28

V accused me of making it up.

 
 
Comment by DF
2011-08-08 05:38:53

So I’m guessing no Harbor Freight tools in those toolboxes ;-) ?

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-08-08 09:10:46

Sometimes Snap-On is the only thing that will work.

My rear calipers have 10mm bolts that are in a machined recess in the calipers. Harbor Freight sockets are too thick to fit into the recess. Has to be either a 1/4 drive 10mm Snap-On, or go to the pawn shop or swap meet, and find the thinnest wall Craftsman socket you can find, and turn it down on a belt sander.

Why are Snap-On tools expensive? Because a lot of times, they are worth it.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:13:28

Why are Snap-On tools expensive? Because a lot of times, they are worth it.

Indeed they are!

Back when I worked in the bike shop, the boss had some Snap-On tools. If you were really good and asked him very nicely, he’d let you borrow them for a minute or two.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 04:21:22

Today’s houses, bank-owned neighbors:

Here’s a light fixer-upper foreclosure at a low-ballable price in an okay neighborhood:

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/4723-Boiling-Brook-Pkwy-Rockville-MD-20852/37092882_zpid/#hdp-photo-lightbox

07/07/2011 Listed $250,000
06/07/2004 Sold $10 <– not a typo
08/07/1978 Sold $65,000

1953 3/1.5 on a quarter acre.
Looks like Grandma died in 2004?
Somebody tried to flip in 2005, now in foreclosure.
The kitchen needs a total redo.

And here is a nearly identical house two doors down, just SOLD.

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/4719-Boiling-Brook-Pkwy-Rockville-MD-20852/37092676_zpid/

04/07/2011 Sold $352,072 <– fraud? There is no way this house would sell for this price, not even in DC.
03/31/2011 Listed for sale $300,000
2004 tax assesment: $212,890

Very good location. But it’s got the Ugliest. Interior. Ever.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 07:01:02

Zillow has a feature where an interactive map/satellite image can show recent sales or resales in a given area. Once you’ve zoomed in to the area you want to check you click the mouse while over that area and all the sales show up. Click on one of them to show the address and some house details.

We used that feature to look at a number of the old nabes where we used to live. Prices have held up very well in NoVa thank you very much. In Annapolis they’re still a bit higher than we sold in 2002. They are WAY down everywhere else.

In NoVA our old 2400 sf, brick front house (doesn’t even qualify as a McMansion) that’s now over 30 years old would apparently sell in the upper $600K range, based on recent nearby sales. That’s out near the Loudoun County line in FFX county. Around here it would be in the low $200K range.

Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 07:50:35

I like zillow because of the map. Re al TOR . com makes you put in a zipcode, and doesn’t have the tax and sales info.

NoVa is where the Pentagon is. Montgomery County is where the Fed workers have their bedroom communities. MoCo is still holding up at 2004 prices.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:14:42

Anything on a street called “Parkway” sends up a red flag. And on that red flag, I see two words:

Traffic Noise.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 04:32:54

Fannie Mae loss widens; asking taxpayers for $2.8B

By MICHELLE CHAPMAN AP Business Writer
August 5, 2011 10:49PM

NEW YORK — Government-controlled mortgage company Fannie Mae said Friday that its second-quarter loss widened as it continues to seek loan modifications to help reduce defaults amid the ongoing difficulties in the housing and mortgage markets.

Fannie Mae also made $2.3 billion in dividend payments to the U.S. Treasury during the period, which reduces the amount it will be asking taxpayers for to $2.8 billion from $5.1 billion.

Fannie’s rescue has been one of the most expensive government bailouts. The amount of money it has received from the Treasury to stay afloat is set to rise to $104.8 billion when accounting for the latest request. Fannie has paid back $14.7 billion to the Treasury in dividends as of the end of June.

http://www.suntimes.com/business/6909877-420/fannie-mae-loss-widens-asking-taxpayers-for-2.8b - -

Comment by 2banana
2011-08-08 06:04:50

Fannie Mae loss widens; asking taxpayers for $2.8B

U.S. Move to Cover Fannie, Freddie Losses Stirs Controversy
WSJ
Dec 28, 2009
By JAMES R. HAGERTY and JESSICA HOLZER

The Obama administration’s decision to cover an unlimited amount of losses at the mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the next three years stirred controversy over the holiday.

The Treasury announced Thursday it was removing the caps that limited the amount of available capital to the companies to $200 billion each.

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-08-08 09:15:08

I’m really sick of rich people being guaranteed by the guv. how about dropping the max loan limit to $200K with 3% down $300 with 10% and back to $417 with 20%…

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 14:43:59

Is there a point where the “unlimited amount of losses” guarantee will be lifted? What might trigger that consideration?

 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 06:44:01

One person can’t sell more than they buy, unless someone else is buying more than they sell. For one entity to make money, someone else has to go into debt.

To unwind that debt, the person with the money has to spend it. If they won’t spend it, then the person with the debt can’t pay off the debt. If the debt is written off as unpayable, then the money has to go away. If the government doesn’t want the money to go away, then they must make the debt payable by transferring it from one entitiy to another.

Doesn’t change the fact that if the people with money won’t spend it, then the government can’t pay off the debt.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 07:27:13

“…asking taxpayers for $2.8B”

Do taxpayers have a right of refusal? Where do I sign up?

Comment by mikeinbend
2011-08-08 09:01:08

Fannie needs a Wide Load sticker.
Maybe that is why all the BofA loans are being called in our county. Recontrust is getting down to the business of foreclosing and taking back properties ultimately owned by Fannie.

690 going up for auction this year; after a more than a year hiatus. Looking to see how many of their 8 scheduled auctions go back to the bank and subsequently fannie today and every other business day this year.

Good market to study as they have sold 0 for so long it will be easy to follow these properties and how long it takes them to go from homeowner to servicer to loanowner(fannie) then to market as REO. and if they succeed at putting 700 props on the market; what will that do to said market? Which is very hot on the low end; offers coming in hours after placing a well priced offering.

Of course many fall thru. My mom had an offer all but “accepted” by BofA on a short sale; before they decided to stop countering after a tenative deal had been reached. Decided not to go thru with the short sale; maybe because the underwater borrower may be good for a few more payments?

She is now gonna start shopping from the auction list, cuz BofA may be interested in dealing on these homes more than those not on the auction list. Of course that short sale is not on their auction list just yet BofA must not be motivated.

I have a friend who diligently applied for HAMP; only to get denied for not sending in documents (ha! he sent them in plenty of times and can prove this and their receipt of said documents).

But instead of qualifying for HAMP; he has found himself on Recontrust’s auction list. they are such a pain to deal with, and patently unfair; so no wonder homemoaners are trying to hang on to the beast whose actions truly are beastly.

Off to the coast with my kids to volunteer my time at a non-profit summer camp. Its water week so I get to teach surfing; water safety; and camp with my kids. Cheapo vacation that I can do thanks to SNAP food bennies but wife cant come cuz she has to rent videos to the general public at the supermarket. she will be missed but we are gonna have fun and I am taking my kids surfing!

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 16:13:00

“Where do I sign up?”

At the voting booth, unfortunately…

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:30:51

The problem with that plan is that your vote has little effect on desperation measures taken to alleviate a crisis. Take the TARP, for instance: Voter approval was nonexistent, yet the Congress went through with it because the Treasury Secretary convinced them that it was necessary to prevent financial and economic Armageddon.

So far as I can tell, the TARP failed to prevent Armageddon, but did help Goldman Sacks to profit handsomely from it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 04:40:00

Democrats seek to pin credit downgrade on tea party

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/7/democrats-seek-to-pin-credit-downgrade-on-tea-part/

“While continuing to cast doubt on the credibility of Standard & Poor’s, several Democrats on Sunday said there is an even greater culprit in the downgrade of the nation’s credit rating: the tea party.

“I believe this is, without question, the tea party downgrade,” Sen. John F. Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday… David Axelrod, a former senior adviser to President Obama, used the exact same phrase in dubbing the credit rating drop the “tea party downgrade,” as Democrats tried to position themselves as reasonable, pragmatic leaders and conservative Republicans as irresponsible ideologues who caused the downgrade by refusing to accept any new taxes.

That’s exactly the kind of blame game that led Standard & Poor’s, one of three key credit-ratings agencies, to strip the U.S. federal government of its AAA status Friday night and reducing it to AA+ for the first time in the nation’s history.”

———

People in the same political party using the exact same phrase to create a talking point? Oh the horror!!!

Comment by 2banana
2011-08-08 06:07:05

Democrats seek to pin credit downgrade on tea party

The dems know where the blame is going in 2012.

Right on obama.

And obama will drag them down with him.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-08-08 09:17:31

Gee, let’s see…..

-Who forced this issue? the Tea-publicans.

-Who has been saying for the past three months that a default didn’t mean anything? The Tea-publicans.

If a default didn’t mean anything, then why are the Tea-publicans running around pointing fingers at Obama? Own it.

I swear to God, I’ve been transported into a parallel universe, where all of the “leadership” is channeling their inner 5 year old.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 09:38:25

“And obama will drag them down with him.”

Wishful thinking.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 07:28:14

I thought S&P basically pinned the downgrade on the Tea Party. Is the MSM equating S&P with “Democrats”?

Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 07:58:42

Here’s more from the S&P report (I linked it above:)

“We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government debt burden by the middle of the decade.”
———

In other words, S&P pegged both Dems for not reforming entitlements and R’s for walking out on revenue increases. However, the “prolonged controversey” rest squarely on the Tea Party.

You know, Obamacare DID reform entitlements, when it cut Medicare ADVANTAGE which was a private middleman.

S&P also assumes that the Bush tax cuts will expire. If they don’t, then S&P will downgrade us again.

Comment by butters
2011-08-08 08:32:44

So in other words, we don’t want democracy. We don’t want people discussing in public. We still want the way Paulson did. Middle of the night, one page document for 700 bil……

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:27:12

That truly sucked, but I believe Big Hank truly seemed desperate.

The question I have often asked myself was, “Why?” Did he truly believe he was somehow saving the system by handing $700bn to Wall Street, or was it all a highly convincing acting job?

 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 09:19:42

“If it injures the people that we represent, but it’s benefiting the whole country, that’s what we need to be concerned about,” she said.

The comments came at a meeting sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. Martin was joined by fellow TPP co-founder Mark Meckler, who laid out view that the default terror expressed by both sides of the aisle is essentially a myth.

He said that the government would still be able to pay its “sovereign obligations” if the debt ceiling isn’t raised, meaning the only real hit would be to the expensive government programs tea partiers want to see slashed anyway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:24:37

Sounds like S&P’s laid the blame for the downgrade where it belongs: On Republican Congressmen & Women plates. No amount of Koch-funded Republican spin can change the basic reality of the situation, or the S&P’s honest assessment thereof.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 04:41:06

Realtors Are Liars®

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:55:48

Is it true that their monthly cases of mouthwa$h are an allowable irs “bidne$$” tax deduction?

 
 
Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-08-08 04:42:40

Where do you put your savings?
ECB is buyer of last and only resort for PIIGS treasuries.
Will the Bernank print more money? Why is gold in a bubble, or isn’t it?
Buying treasuries with freshly printed money is inflationary. This money will quickly find its way into the economy via government spending. On the other hand there are clearly deflationary forces such as defaulting homeloaners and PIIGS countries. Long term I am still not convinced about deflation. No amount of austerity will stop the runaway debt train plus you run the very real risk of insurrection and revolution if you create a desperate unemployed underclass with no gubernmint cheese.
Personally I do not consider fiat money a reliable store of value for my savings. Real estate is subject to punishing property taxes by desperate municipalities plus I really hate being a slum lord. Stocks haven’t gone nowhere in the last 14 years, actually inflation adjusted they’re down. Some pay 5-6% dividends which is nice. Maybe some energy stocks once peak oil starts to bite.
Other than high quality corporate bonds, dividend stocks and PM I don’t see very many places that make for a reliable long term store of value. Do you?

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 05:50:07

I wish I knew. No gold options available in my 401(k).

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-08-08 06:31:10

Yeah, that 401K money. Luckily we have more options now. We can buy any mutual fund that’s traded on Wall Street. My wife only has a limited number of options, maybe 20. One PIMCO fund being one of them. Those guys seem pretty smart, I told her those are the least likely to gamble away her retirement money. Personally I like Jeff Gundlach, he manages Doubleline securites, like DBLTX. He seems rather competent. I just hope those guys don’t turn out to be another Madoff.
Yesterday I was at a local coin show to make my usual monthly investment in PM. It’s pretty easy to buy or sell there. The spread is typically 3%.
It can’t go on much longer like this. The financial situation is coming to a head. 401K accounts are sitting ducks for desperate politicians. I tried to get my money out but I would have to quit my job to do that, not an option.

Comment by SDGreg
2011-08-08 08:10:34

“My wife only has a limited number of options, maybe 20.”

Lucky her, I have a whole 5. I can decide which of 5 poor options I can take to the bottom. I’m got everything in the treasury fund option, which appears to be the least bad option at the moment. I’m still in a preserving principal mode as best I can.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:18:19

I’m got everything in the treasury fund option, which appears to be the least bad option at the moment. I’m still in a preserving principal mode as best I can.

Good for you, SDGreg.

Back when I was employed, if you weren’t full-bore in the stock market, you were belittled. Especially if you were a woman. If you didn’t touch the market, you were being too cautious, and since women live longer than men, how could you afford NOT to be in stocks?

We know how that one turned out.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:21:34

“Especially if you were a woman.”

There certainly is a case for holding your ground in times like these. Albeit it was part luck, but I did take what little gains I had in the stock market off the table this past spring, and now I am witnessing a market collapse with the vague reassurance that I don’t have much skin in the game, while wondering when to get back in before the Fed tries to inflate away all their problems with QE3.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 06:03:56

People seem to worship this gold standard currency, seeming to not understant that money was still borrowed into existance. There were still booms and busts, runs on banks… There were like 22 recessionce in the 100 years between the Civil War and the end of the gold standard.

For every buyer there has to seller. In a non-barter economy, it is possible to sell more than you buy. We call that imbalance, money.

Money is borrowed into existance when someone goes to a bank and gets a loan, and then uses that loan to buy more than tehy sell.

In barter, no one can sell more than they buy becuase there is no money or debt. Money and debt are the offsetting factors that make it possible to sell more than you buy (getting money) and buy more than you sell (getting debt).

And, it does not matter if that debt is backed by leveraging gold or by leveriging promises of the federal government to repay its share of the debt, it is still leverage.

Unwinding leverage requires one of three things. The people with money start buying more than they sell so that it will be possible for others to sell more than they buy. (remember, there has to be a buyer for every seller and a seller for every buyer.) OR the people with debt go through bankruptcy and the debt is written off as uncollectable and the offsetting money is written off as uncollectable OR the basis of the leverage must increase.

In a gold standard you are locked into 1, 2, or some middle-ground of the 3. With a fiat currency, you have 3 options or some middle-ground of the 3.

Is stagflation really that much worse than depression?

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-08-08 06:55:41

A gold backed currency is certainly no “cure all” for our economic ills. A quick look into the history books will confirm various panics and recessions during the good ole days. An additional constraint our economic system is facing is that we live in a finite world with finite resources from food to energy to raw materials.
It seems to be inherently difficult to have money as a medium of exchange and a store of value at the same time. A big problem during the gold currency days was that people would hoard gold as a means of saving.
I don’t have the numbers but I would like to know how much paper value exists versus how much all the real stuff (real estate, commodities, factories, infrastructure, etc.) is worth. I have the suspicion that there’s too much money and not enough stuff. Or put another way, that stuff is relatively cheap versus the amount of paper assets.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 07:09:03

Yes, but the small recessions were like small forest fires in the West, they allowed for creative destruction that enhanced low inflation growth. Check out the low inflation during that period. When government is allowed to create fiat currency they mess up the business cycle and create conditions for the total collapse of an economy. Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe are two examples of that.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 07:15:29

I do not disagree. I am just pointing out that gold is no cure all.

So, 20 small fires are better than one HUGE one? Yeah, I’d agree with that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 07:22:36

“Yes, but the small recessions were like small forest fires in the West, they allowed for creative destruction that enhanced low inflation growth”

What about the large depressions? Like the Long Depression, which lasted from 1873 to 1896, and was called the Great Depression, until the one in the 30s gained that title (old people at that time still said that the current depression wasn’t as bad or as long as the ‘real’ Great Depression- the one that lasted decades.

wikipedia:
In the United States, economists typically refer to the Long Depression as the Depression of 1873–79, kicked off by the Panic of 1873, and followed by the Depression of 1893, book-ending the entire period of the wider Long Depression.[4] The National Bureau of Economic Research dates the contraction following the panic as lasting from October 1873 to March 1879. At 65 months, it is the longest-lasting contraction identified by the NBER, eclipsing the Great Depression’s 43 months of contraction.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 10:26:31

Propaganda from the fiat crowd on this alleged great depression in the 1870’s falling prices yes. Mass unemployed no:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2006/06/03/1870s_economics/

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 10:44:06

I think we would like to have another period like the 1870’s just the opposite from the stagflation we have now:

Murray Rothbard on the Long Depression:

“Orthodox economic historians have long complained about the “great depression” that is supposed to have struck the United States in the panic of 1873 and lasted for an unprecedented six years, until 1879. Much of this stagnation is supposed to have been caused by a monetary contraction leading to the resumption of specie payments in 1879. Yet what sort of “depression” is it which saw an extraordinarily large expansion of industry, of railroads, of physical output, of net national product, or real per capita income? As Friedman and Schwartz admit, the decade from 1869 to 1879 saw a 3-percent-perannum increase in money national product, an outstanding real national product growth of 6.8 percent per year in this period, and a phenomenal rise of 4.5 percent per year in real product per capita. Even the alleged “monetary contraction” never took place, the money supply increasing by 2.7 percent per year in this period. From 1873 through 1878, before another spurt of monetary expansion, the total supply of bank money rose from $1.964 billion to $2.221 billion—a rise of 13.1 percent or 2.6 percent per year. In short, a modest but definite rise, and scarcely a contraction. It should be clear, then, that the “great depression” of the 1870s is merely a myth—a myth brought about by misinterpretation of the fact that prices in general fell sharply during the entire period. Indeed they fell from the end of the Civil War until 1879. Friedman and Schwartz estimated that prices in general fell from 1869 to 1879 by 3.8 percent per annum. Unfortunately, most historians and economists are conditioned to believe that steadily and sharply falling prices must result in depression: hence their amazement at the obvious prosperity and economic growth during this era. For they have overlooked the fact that in the natural course of events, when government and the banking system do not increase the money supply very rapidly, free market capitalism will result in an increase of production and economic growth so great as to swamp the increase of money supply. Prices will fall, and the consequences will be not depression or stagnation, but prosperity (since costs are falling, too) economic growth, and the spread of the increased living standard to all the consumers.”[41]

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 11:19:22

Oh, Murray Rothbard, the Austrian School historian/economist, says the Log Depression wasn’t so bad?

Yes, the Austrian School is heavily invested in rewriting history by claiming that the Long Depression (which is covered in every history textbook on the period), didn’t actually happen, or was actually a good period that somehow garnered the popular name ‘the Great Depression’ from people who lived through it. You will find all the footnoted entries in wikipedia that question the reality and severity of the Long Depression are linked to Austrian Schoolers.

I worry about economic/political movements that try to rewrite history. It signals something about them, and it ain’t good.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 11:23:22

LoNg Depression (Did I mention it was worldwide, and appears in the world’s history textbooks, too? Quite a misunderstanding/conspiracy to convince the entire world they’d gone through a long, great depression.)

wikipedia
It was most notable in Western Europe and North America, at least in part because reliable data from the period is most readily available in those parts of the world. The United Kingdom is often considered to have been the hardest hit; during this period it lost some of its large industrial lead over the economies of Continental Europe.[2] While it was occurring, the view was prominent that the economy of the United Kingdom had been in continuous depression from 1873 to as late as 1896 and some texts refer to the period as the Great Depression of 1873–96.[3]

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 11:55:09

LoNg Depression (Did I mention it was worldwide, and appears in the world’s history textbooks, too? Quite a misunderstanding/conspiracy to convince the entire world they’d gone through a long, great depression.)

Look we were the China of that era and the deflation we exported did hurt places like the UK, just like we are being hurt today. But it was a Golden era for United States and the U.S. workers. The standard of living for U.S. workers rose 75% after inflation between 1865-1900, all of which occurred prior to the federal reserve and when we were on a gold standard.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 12:24:46

“But it was a Golden era for United States and the U.S. workers. ”

Then why did the people who lived through it call it the Great Depression? Mass hallucination?

Here’s an answer to your GDP growth argument:

wikipedia
In the United States, the Long Depression began with the Panic of 1873. The National Bureau of Economic Research dates the contraction following the panic as lasting from October 1873 to March 1879. At 65 months, it is the longest-lasting contraction identified by the NBER, eclipsing the Great Depression’s 43 months of contraction.[5][22] Figures from Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz show net national product increased 3 percent per year from 1869 to 1879 and real national product grew at 6.8 percent per year during that time frame.[23] However, since between 1869 and 1879 the population of the United States increased by over seventeen and one-half percent,[24] per capita NNP growth was lower. Following the end of the episode in 1879, the U.S. economy would remain unstable, experiencing recessions for 114 of the 253 months until January 1901.[5]

The dramatic shift in prices mauled nominal wages - in the United States, nominal wages declined by one-quarter during the 1870s,[9] and as much as one-half in some places, such as Pennsylvania.[

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 12:34:00

Oh, and perhaps the extensive history of worldwide crises and panics during the period will convince you it actually occurred? Or was the whole world under a mass hallucination?

wikipedia
The Panic of 1873 has been described as “the first truly international crisis.”[8] The optimism that had been driving booming stock prices in central Europe had reached a fever pitch, and fears of a bubble culminated in a panic in Vienna beginning in April 1873. The collapse of the Vienna Stock Exchange began on May 8, 1873 and continued until May 10, when the exchange was closed; when it was reopened three days later, the panic seemed to have faded, and appeared confined to Austria-Hungary.[8] Financial panic arrived in America only months later on Black Thursday, September 18, 1873 after the failure of the banking house of Jay Cooke and Company over the Northern Pacific Railway.[9] The Northern Pacific railway had been given 40 million acres (160,000 km2) of public land in the West and Jay Cooke sought $100,000,000 in capital for the company; the bank failed when the bond issue proved unsalable, and was shortly followed by several other major banks. The New York Stock Exchange closed for ten days on September 20.[8]

The financial contagion then returned to Europe, provoking a second panic in Vienna and further failures in continental Europe before receding.

In America the speculative nature of financing due to both the greenback which was paper currency issued to pay for the US Civil War and rampant fraud in the building of the Union Pacific Railway up to 1869 culminated in the Credit Mobilier panic. Railway overbuilding and weak markets collapsed the bubble in 1873. Both the Union Pacific and the Northern Pacific lines were center in the collapse; another railway bubble was the UK railway mania.

Recovery began in 1878. The mileage of railroad track laid down increased from 2,665 mi (4,289 km) in 1878 to 11,568 in 1882.[21] Construction began recovery by 1879; the value of building permits increased two and a half times between 1878 and 1883, and unemployment fell to 2.5% in spite of high immigration.[18]

The recovery, however, proved short-lived. Business profits declined steeply between 1882 and 1884.[18] The recovery in railroad construction reversed itself, falling from 11,569 mi (18,619 km) of track laid in 1882 to 2,866 mi (4,612 km) of track laid in 1885; the price of steel rails collapsed from $71/ton in 1880 to $20/ton in 1884.[18] Manufacturing again collapsed - durable goods output fell by a quarter again.[18] The decline became another financial crisis in 1884, when multiple New York banks collapsed; simultaneously, in 1883-1884, tens of millions of dollars of foreign-owned American securities were sold out of fears that the United States was preparing to abandon the gold standard.[18] This financial panic destroyed eleven New York banks, more than a hundred state banks, and led to defaults on at least $32 million worth of debt.[18] Unemployment, which had stood at 2.5% between recessions, surged to 7.5% in 1884-1885, and 13% in the northeastern United States, even as immigration plunged in response to deteriorating labor markets.[18]

This second recession led to further deterioration of farm prices. Kansas farmers burned their own corn in 1885 because it was worth less than other fuels such as coal or wood.[18]

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:14:45

“I worry about economic/political movements that try to rewrite history. It signals something about them, and it ain’t good.”

Do you mean like that ‘Paradox of Thrift’ Keynesian nonsense you were ranting about last night?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:17:36

Railway Housing overbuilding and weak markets officially-sanctioned accounting fraud collapsed the bubble in 1873 2008.”

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 08:11:42

Darrell, what about labor? Doesn’t that count as money too? How does that fit in?

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:34:57

Labor is transitive stuff. Just like with real stuff, there has to be a buyer and a seller.

In a barter economy, labor is traded just like goods. I’ll clean your house for a loaf of bread.

But in the case of a labor imbalance, where you want someone to do labor for you but you don’t have labor they want you to do for them, you go and borrow some money into existance to get the guy to do some labor for you.

You then better be able to find someone that wants you to do some labor or wants some stuff from you, and they better have money to give you for it, so you can go pay back your loan.

Money is stil just some “people owe me in the future” and it is offset by “I owe someone something in the future”. Stuff or labor doesn’t matter.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by sfrenter
2011-08-08 08:26:13

Thanks Darrell_in_PHX for your persistence in explaining the money system.

This should be required for every 4th grader.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-08-08 09:52:18

In a non-barter economy, it is possible to sell more than you buy. We call that imbalance, money.

——————-
It’s possible to sell more than you buy in a barter econonmy too. EX: I own a farm. I don’t need food or clothes, so i just buy a tv. I trade a goat and some apples for a tv. Boom. I have other goats who can breed to replace the goat i sold and i have an apple tree to make more apples.

Money is more of a value store for an accumulation of assets than it is an imbalance between buying and selling. In what world besides Econ101 books are buyers and sellers for a single transaction always perfectly balanced?

What does ‘balanced’ even mean in any economy?

They way you want to redefine all these terms reminds me of Robert Kiowayaskai.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:42:48

“It’s possible to sell more than you buy in a barter econonmy too. EX: I own a farm. I don’t need food or clothes, so i just buy a tv.”

If the exchage rate for a tv is a goat and some apples, and you exchage a goat and some apples for a tv, then there is no trade imbalance.

Value of goat and apples = x.
Value of tv = y.
x=y is the negotiated exchage rate.

You sold a goat and some apples and bought a tv. You sold just as much as you bought. No imbalance.

You go to the same guy wanting a tv. He says, sorry, you don’t have anything I want to trade for a tv. Go get some money. You go to the bank and take out a loan of money. You use the money to buy the tv. You bought more than you sold by generating debt, and he sold more than he bought so has money.

Now, you better be able to find someone to buy your stuff (or labor) in exchage for money, or you can’t pay back your loan. If you do not pay back your loan, then the bank that issued the loan goes under. In the old days that meant the guy with the money suddenly found that money worthless. In moderntimes, the bank issued me a loan in federal reserve notes, so the government take on the debt of that money when I failed to repay.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 08:57:57

Dont forget, the ECB is still rated AAA.

 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 04:43:45

“They’ve handled themselves very poorly. And they’ve shown a stunning lack of knowledge about the basic U.S. fiscal budget math,” Geithner said in his first public comments about the credit rating decision.

-Says a guy who claims he was completly stymied by the complexities of Turbo-Tax.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:50:53

Well to be fair, some fellas seem to do things better at work, than at home.

 
 
Comment by Montana
2011-08-08 05:28:56

So late Sat night I overhear an old friend saying how his new GF’s tenants aren’t paying rent and won’t leave, so she’s thinking of letting the thing go back to the bank because she can’t make the payment. She bought at the height of the market, and he is telling her OMG it’s a house in the Bitterroot, don’t let it go back! He’ll help with the mortgage..besides she still has a house in LA that is *worth* 800k!

FB’s everywhere, as far as the eyes can see.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 05:46:34

Is Bitterroot the next town over from Frogballs, Arkansas?

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-08-08 07:21:08

and they want a do over!!!

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:49:08

OMG it’s a house in the Bitterroot

They aren’t making anymore snow in pine trees,…Montana has it all to herself. ;-)

 
 
Comment by michael
2011-08-08 05:57:49

everyone ready for the financial porn today?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 06:26:49

Haven’t we had enough of this theatre?

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 06:35:19

Every day is a good day for “the bottom” at this point. Remember how this works?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 08:01:38

That’s right. How could I forget serial bottom calling??? NARscum perfected that lie.

Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 08:41:02

David Lereah is your Hiltler, isn’t he?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 09:32:59

That would be Nordquist.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 06:10:42

“Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says the credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s showed ‘terrible judgment’ in lowering the U.S. government’s credit rating. Geithner said the agency’s decision showed a “stunning lack of knowledge” about the basic math used to develop the federal budget.”

Mr. Geither, you’ve given the President some very bad advice. This is just a financial crisis and short term recession. It is the collapse of a debt driven economy that has been building, other than a few years after George HW Bush broke his no tax pledge and actually cut spending, for 30 years.

Federal debt. State and local debt. Retirement promises made but not paid for. Credit card debt. Second mortgage and HELOC debt. Private equity buyout debt. Derivative debt.

Thirty years of current account deficits. This was going to collapse, is going to collapse, and all your efforts have only delayed the collapse at great cost to the government.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 06:24:18

did you mean to say this is NOT just a financial crisis and short term recession?

Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 07:00:04

Right, sorry.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:44:36

Second mortgage and HELOC debt ;-)

but, but, but…they were Profee$$ionaly $tamped AAA+ with a $trong $upporting Opinion! (oh, eyes forgot,… that’s ancient hi$tory)

$tandard & knotPoor, one of the three main credit-rating agencies, “True$editionist$$erialEnabler$™”

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 06:32:41

America’s Great Unwinding… Decades in the making yet millions upon millions just can’t grasp what brought “it” about, including the dunces in D.C. Sadly all they are doing is making it worse.

ITEM: America’s Fiscal Rot Set in Years Ago: HSBC
Monday, 8 Aug 2011 | CNBC EMEA Head of News

The US fiscal position is messy, and steadily getting worse, according to HSBC chief economist Stephen King.

“The downgrade by S&P, the ratings agency, merely confirms what everyone already knew. The symbolism, however, is mightily important,” King wrote in a research note Monday.

Whilst the battle over the debt ceiling [cnbc explains] has grabbed the headlines in recent months, King believes it did little to address the real problems facing the US.

“Even before the financial crisis, the fiscal path was unsustainable: an ageing population combined with extravagant social security commitments suggested either the need for massive tax increases or draconian spending cuts,” said King.

The downgrade does put pressure on the US to act according to Jan Poser, chief economist at Sarasin in Zurich.

“The most important consequence of the US rating downgrade is the fact that US economic policymakers now have their backs to the wall. They are forced to make savings,” Poser wrote in a note on Monday.

“On the other hand, the need to economize means that fiscal policy to prevent another downturn will drop out of the picture. Monetary policy, which does not appear very effective at the current interest rate level, will bear the full burden.”

“As a consequence, poor macro data releases are likely to make investors more nervous than was hitherto the case,” he added.

Following the financial crisis which started 4 years ago, the US fiscal position has got much worse, and is now far worse than in crisis hit Europe according to King.

The US federal, state and local government deficit jumped from 2.9 percent of GDP in 2007 to 10.6 percent, and the ratio of debt to GDP jumped from 62 percent to 93 percent in 2010, according to OECD figures.

The euro [EUR=X 1.4171 -0.0213 (-1.48%) ] zone’s average deficit of 6.0 percent of GDP, a primary deficit of 1.1 percent of GDP and debt/GDP ratio about the same as America’s is “nothing like as bad” and “rising nowhere near as quickly” said King.

Poser believes the debt story is now all about the data and not about the politics.

“In the event of a more severe economic downturn, debts would rise with or without fiscal countermeasures and trigger a further downgrade. Hence, economic data will play a more important role than the political debate,” said Poser.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 06:52:46

One unchangable aspect of economics is that for every buyer there must be a seller, and for every seller there must be a buyer.

For one person to sell more than they buy (getting money as a measure of this imbalance) someone else has to be getting debt (again, the off-setting measure of the imbalance).

Supply-side economics allowed people with stuff to sell to sell that to people that wanted it, by allowing those people that wanted it to go into debt. One entity gets money and the other gets debt.

Corporation have not raked in mega profits DESPITE a massive run up in debt. They were able to make profits BECAUSE the massive run up in debt.

Now, the people with debt can’t pay it back unless the people with money start buying more than they sell so that the people with debt can sell more than they buy.

Unwinding leverage requires those with money to have less money.

Comment by sfrenter
2011-08-08 08:30:48

Darrell_in_PHX:

How does interest fit into the money-creation? Seems to me that there will never be enough money to pay back interest: if money is created by taking on debt, the interest that is supposed to be paid back comes from…nowhere?

Comment by The_Overdog
2011-08-08 10:36:27

sfrenter: Darrell’s analysis is not taking time nor multiple sellers and buyers with different needs into account. Money is not created by taking on debt in any true sense of the word. ” One entity gets money and the other gets debt.” No. One entity gets a promise it will be repaid and the other gets debt.

Debt is created by taking on debt, where debt means you didn’t have enough money at the time to purchase what you wanted. It didn’t create any money. The person you are indebted to realizes this and he realizes that you may not pay him back, as he charges you interest on his loan to you. Interest is the realization that time is an important factor with reguard to money.

To illustrate this point and to keep things simple, assume the debt is a consumable — an apple. Wimpy will pay you tomorrow for an apple today. You need the money so instead of finding a buyer who can pay now, you say sure, the price is X today, and X+$1 tomorrow. Well Wimpy eats the apple and doesn’t pay crap tomorrow and furthermore, says he can never pay.

How much money was created? None. As a matter of fact some was destroyed. You have an uncollectable debt for a product no longer in existence. In this world, there are no lawyers, so instead you break Wimpy’s arm to teach him a lesson about destroying money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:52:26

Interest is simply yet another loaning money into existance.

When the bank charges me interst, it credits its money account and deducts my loan account.

Example. I go borrow $100K from the bank. I give it to someone selling a house. A month goes buy and the bank charges me $500 in interst. The bank has just loaned me $500 and taken $500 profit to themselves. I owe the bank $100500.

The person I bought the house from spends $1000 of the money I gae him for the house. That $1000 cycles through the economy to IBM.

I do some labor for IBM, and they hand me a check for $1000. I give the check to the bank. The bank reduces my balance by $1000 so I only owe them $99500. The $1000 just went away.

The guy I bought the house from has $99K left. The bank has $500. And I owe the bank the $99,500.

Those people with the money better keep spending, or someone else better take out a loan and spend it, becasue I need money to keep coming to me so that I can pay that debt. The only way I can get that money is if a rich person is getting less rich or someone else is going further into debt.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 08:42:56

“Unwinding leverage requires those with money to have less money.”

That’s where the taxman comes in.

It’s hard to force someone to buy a yacht when they already own ten. You tax them, and yes, you redistribute the wealth to the poorer people. And guess what? It all ends up back in the pockets of the wealthy in a few months, anyway. But along its path there, it juices the entire economy, and essentially makes the whole thing work.

Income taxes are the creative destruction of capitalism at work. The wealth of the rich is ‘destroyed’ (taken by taxes), and given to the poorer, who promptly spend it and create the economy in which we live.

Without taxes to do this, we need to have regular major economic wipe-outs to redistribute this wealth from where it is ‘locked-up’ in the hands of the wealthy. We have found that the disruptions caused by these meltdowns (WW2, etc), in modern times (ie when we’re not a nation of subsistence farmers anymore) are too extreme, and therefore we wisely let the taxman do it for us. At least we used to, and it worked quite well for quite a while.

Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 09:05:12

Capitalism is supposed to play a part as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 09:28:55

wikipedia
Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit, usually in competitive markets.

There’s no contradiction between capitalism and the gov taking the money of the wealthy through taxation and giving it to the poor to spend at privately-owned, for-profit businesses in competitive markets.

It’s a necessary part of capitalism, otherwise the money ends up in the hands of the few, the many revolt, and capitalism is replaced with the latest cockamamie scheme the idealists have dreamed up.

Capitalism is the best economic system, as long as safeguards are in place to buffer its more extreme aspects (eg people starving in the streets), and to mitigate its self-destructive tendency towards extreme wealth concentration in the hands of the few.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:27:42

It’s the competitive part that is missing.

It all about lobbying now a days, not about the competing.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 12:56:21

“It’s the competitive part that is missing.”

Where the recipients of government welfare choose to spend their money is decided in a relatively open, competitive market.

“It all about lobbying now a days, not about the competing.”

I agree lobbyists have too much power, and can use that power to decrease their industries’ competition. The solution to that is publicly-funded elections and strong limits on lobbying. The usual suspects oppose that, of course, and have filled the Supreme Court with like-minded individuals, who think corporate money equals speech, and its origins are nobody’s business, even when the money is used in political campaigns.

 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:55:15

It doesn’t matter how we get the money from the peope with it. Forcing them to spend it to avoid taxes, direct taxes, or just letting the debt default and go away as uncollectable.

The fact remains that for the people to get out of debt, the people with the money that was created from that debt, have to no longer have that money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by measton
2011-08-08 11:54:12

Which is why they have lobbied so hard to have the gov loose the money instead of themselves.

Privatize the gains socialize the losses. The elite want the shrinking upper middle and middle class to pay the losses. At somepoint there will be no more money to raid and then what. Buy an island and hide until the war destroys everything?

 
 
 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-08-08 07:23:19

One does get the impression that part of the story behind this downgrade episode is that the gov’t GDP forecasts have finally come under some serious scrutiny.

At my state and local level this has not yet happen, but I can’t say why. State and local revenue forecasts are taken as gospel although with each passing quarter they fall by the wayside.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2011-08-08 08:16:40

“Even before the financial crisis, the fiscal path was unsustainable: an aging population combined with extravagant social security commitments suggested either the need for massive tax increases or draconian spending cuts,” said King.”

The Social Security commitments aren’t extravagant, and they’re mostly paid for. Raise or remove the cap on income subject to Social Security taxes and there would be no financial issues at all for Social Security.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 10:54:40

Not to mention that Gen X & Y are larger than the “aging population” that is retiring.

Extravagant? $1100 a month is livin’ large? Only in the countries we outsource to. Here, you’re poor. Period.

 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:57:09

Ture. It is actually the Medicare benefits that are extravagant and can’t be paid for.

Comment by measton
2011-08-08 11:56:38

The medicare benefits could be paid for if we adopted a much more efficient medical system. Socialized medicine costs 3500 per person per year vs 7k here in the US. Our medical costs could be cut in half with no impact on our overall health.

The problem of course is that the fleecing of America by insurance giants, pharmaceutical giants etc could not continue. You’ll notice that when they make cuts it’s always to doctors and hospitals never to what they will pay for a drug or medical device.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 14:35:44

That’s where I think we need to go, measton. If some of these runaway costs were reigned in the proposed cuts could be more manageable plus the deleveraging really does need to take place at every level. What better place to start than in areas that swam in profits the last two decades?

But I have never heard any candidate for any office ever make a proposal that mentions cuts on the corporate side. They’re way too afraid of it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:36:42

Sadly all they are doing is making it worse.

…and the award for the Gubmint’$ “True$olutionsCzar™” certificate of achievement is…

[Daffy anxiously holds the "CryPiS$&Moan$NoMore" statue] ;-)

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 10:51:19

What hypocrisy. HSBS is one of the main CAUSES of our “rot.”

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 06:34:32

Obama Admin. to push waivers to NCLB requirements without waiting for Congress to act.

“(Education Secretary Arne) Duncan has warned that 82 percent of U.S. schools could be labeled failures next year if No Child Left Behind is not changed. Education experts have questioned that estimate, but state officials report a growing number of schools facing sanctions under the law.”

Can’t meet the standard? Then we obviously need to lower the bar. And of course throw more money at the problem.

“This Congress faces real challenges reaching bipartisan, bicameral agreement on anything,” said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, in a written statement. “Given the ill-advised and partisan bills that the House majority has chosen to move, I understand Secretary Duncan’s decision to proceed with a waiver package to provide some interim relief while Congress finishes its work.”

Gosh, did Harkin say that when the ill-advised and partisan Obamacare bill was working its way through the House?

Comment by 2banana
2011-08-08 06:41:37

Wow - who would have thought that government run and public union controlled schools would have an 82% failure rate.

There is only one solution.

Throw more money at the problem…

Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 06:54:28

“There is only one solution”.

“Throw more money at the problem”…

And “they” will, hasn’t done a damn bit of good, but no matter. A person or child that is educable can learn outside under a tree!

 
Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 07:04:45

You can’t blame everything on unions, or even on “government run.”

Direct from wikipedia:

“Research shows that the achievement gap, which often first manifests itself through standardized tests in elementary school, actually begins well before students reach kindergarten as a “school readiness” gap.[9] One study claims that about half the test score gap between black and white high school students is already evident when children start school.[10]“

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 09:43:35

Hence the need for Head Start and early childhood nutrition programs. There’s nothing fair or morality-instilling in letting the kids of crack-heads and morons grow up malnourished and mentally stunted by their home environment.

Even though it is ‘welfare’, and therefore inherently evil, I’m told.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:23:42

I live just a few steps away from a neighborhood center with a Head Start program. It’s been there for years and you know what? We neighbors are glad that it’s here.

It gives the kids a place to go where they can learn positive things, and we’re all for that. Our neighborhood Head Start also employs some of the parents of the kids that are enrolled in the program.

BTW, I used to work with a lady whose son went through Head Start. She was a a crusty curmudgeon with a real acid tongue, and everyone in the office took at least one verbal lickin’ from her. However, when it came to Head Start, she was full of compliments.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 10:29:14

If those interventions only worked.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-08-08 10:31:35

Whoops, hit a wrong key. Meant to add- I recall a study saying the Head Start advantage pretty much disappeared by the time the kid was in 4th or 5th grade.

 
Comment by MrBubble
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 13:02:17

“I recall a study saying the Head Start advantage pretty much disappeared by the time the kid was in 4th or 5th grade.”

I guess we should just let ‘em starve in their dysfunctional households, if some study has found that early childhood nutrition isn’t that important, after all.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 14:39:21

Thanks for the link, MrBubble.

The study shows that in terms of education, preschool kindergarten graduates score slightly better in education areas, while Head Start graduates score slightly better in health areas. Sounds like we need a combination of both, not neither.

 
 
 
Comment by howiewowie
2011-08-08 18:23:17

No Child Left Behind is the disaster, not the schools, so much.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-08-08 07:37:35

The number of non-union charter schools in Chicago expanded under Arne Duncan. He was a renown proponent of education “reform” - a word that appears to have very different meanings to different people.

During the 2010 state elections a very well funded lobby sprung onto the scene in IL - “Stand up for Children”, IIRC. It has a warchest funded by some of Chicago’s wealthiest families and it was the new motor behind legislation to reign in the Chicago Teacher’s Union.

Interesting stuff, because the on the surface union teachers are supporting the current state and national administrations in without question. This is even though some of the biggest players are where they are because they nursed along educational policies that to a great extend run afoul of the union agenda.

There are signs locally that some are waking up to this, but at present they have no political alternative as the other party (R) has been entirely advesarial and written off.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:24:19

I understand Secretary Duncan’s decision to proceed with a waiver package to provide some interim relief while [certain “TrueGridLok$editionist's™” wee-peeParty tea toadlers in] Congress finishes its work,…[“ToGetlil'Opie™”]

…reading between the lines meaning
;-)

 
Comment by sfrenter
2011-08-08 08:34:54

Find me some schools filled with middle class and upper class students that are failing.

I dare you.

They don’t exist. There is a direct correlation between socio-economic status and academic achievement. Punish the teachers when their impoverished students don’t do well on the tests and all that will happen is that teachers will either a)leave the profession b)transfer the high-performing schools in wealthier neighborhoods c) cheat on the high-stakes tests.

“(Education Secretary Arne) Duncan has warned that 82 percent of U.S. schools could be labeled failures next year if No Child Left Behind is not changed. Education experts have questioned that estimate, but state officials report a growing number of schools facing sanctions under the law.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 08:58:48

Agreed.

 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:59:05

Bingo.

Nothing helps a kid learn like parent involvement. How is the teacher supposed to force the parents to get involved? We punish the teacehr for getting a job in a neighborhood of broken families and illeterate parents?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 11:37:34

Here’s a school where they don’t expect the parents to be involved. Reason: Parents are already working two or three jobs, so they can’t come to the school for parent conferences.

For more on this school’s educational philosophy, I recommend the founder’s book. Full of all sorts of politically incorrect stuff — that’s funny as all get-out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 20:03:54

Great philosophy. Do they get to kick kids out?

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 14:09:03

Find me some schools filled with middle class and upper class students that are failing.

I dare you.

Are we talking failing on paper or failing in reality? The grade changing fiasco comes to mind.

Comment by oxide
2011-08-08 17:25:45

The grade-changing fiasco was in a poor neighborhood, not upper class.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 06:46:29

. Simple Math

U.S. income: $2,170,000,000,000
Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000
New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
Recent budget cut: $ 38,500,000,000

Mind boggling numbers, to be sure.
But remove eight zeros and look at them as
a family budget.

Total annual income for the Jones family: $21,700
Amount of money the Jones family spent: $38,200
Amount of new debt added to the credit card: $16,500
Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
Amount cut from the budget: $385

Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 06:58:12

Mitigating factor. The reason the Jones are having to borrow is they are both unemployed as a result of the economy.

Compounding factor: they were both borrowing away to enhance their lifestyle during the housing bubble when the money was rolling in, and pledging their children’s future income as collateral.

The sin was committed over the past 30 years. Not the past 30 months, for those who want to blame Obama, or 30 days, for those who want to blame the Tea Party.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 07:04:00

They were borrowing back when they both had jobs as well.

New debt adding money to the economy is a necessary prerequisite to others making money. This is the essence of supply-side economics. Some people had stuff they wanted to sell, but they didn’t want to buy an equal offsettign amount of stuff (making money). For this to be possible, we had to make it possible for others to buy without an offsetting sell (making debt).

The explosion of debt was a necessary prerequisite to explosion in profits.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 09:12:11

We should expect the current titular head of this family to take the blame. We should expect him to blame the dogs following the herd. That is how denial works.

 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 07:01:09

Then realize that no one can get more money, unless someone gets more debt.

People with debt can’t pay it back, unless there is more debt being generated somewhere, or the entites with money start buying more than they sell so they have less money.

I see no indication that the people with money are eager to start spending it just becuase the people with debt must be able to get that money so that they can pay back thier debts.

Therfore, someone has to be adding the new debt that is required to add money to the system so that the people with the debt can get some money to pay on that debt, and the people with money can continue to make more money.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 06:51:20

U.S. Can’t Default
As long as its paper supply holds out.

“The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default” said former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on NBC’s Meet the Press.

← The U.S. doesn’t really have to run the currency printing
press to meet its obligations, thanks to the efficient world of
digital money!
However, this method of clearing debt would destroy the
purchasing power of the dollar, just as it did in the 18th century
when the Continental dollar went kaput. Greenspan knows the truth.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 07:06:49

But there has to be the political willingness to allow that money to be printed.

If the money is printed, the money becomes worth less (if not worthless).

If the money is not printed, then the debt becomes someone elses uncollectable asset.

 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 08:44:16

If we keep a AAA rating the printing can go on indefinitely. Both scams are required in order for the plan to work. Scams are fast becoming the number one export.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:21:55

Fast becomming? Where have you been?

Junk bonds, DotComs, MBS, CDO, CDO squared… Ask Iceland if scam exporting is something new for the USA.

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2011-08-08 06:59:32

offtopic question:

i need a home accounting/finance/budget software and was wondering what any of you would suggest.

i am thinking of getting quicken mainly becuase i used it years ago.

any other suggestions or experiences would be appreciated. it would be cool to find one that works with an Iphone app too.

thanks for your time.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:17:52

July’s Kiplinger’s zine had an article ’bout mint.com (Aaron Patzer), page 48

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:26:01

I’ve been using MYOB for both my business and personal accounting.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2011-08-08 07:29:44

AIG sues BofA for $10 billion alleging “massive fraud”

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The insurer AIG is suing Bank of America Corp to recover more than $10 billion of losses from a “massive fraud” on mortgage debt, deepening the morass of litigation faced by the largest U.S. bank.

American International Group Inc, still largely owned by taxpayers after $182.3 billion of government bailouts, is the latest of a growing number of investors filing lawsuits to hold banks responsible for losses on soured mortgages that contributed to the financial crisis.

The AIG complaint accuses Bank of America and its Countrywide and Merrill Lynch units of misrepresenting the quality of mortgages placed in securities and sold to investors. AIG said it suffered its losses on $28 billion of investments.

“Defendants were engaged in a massive scheme to manipulate and deceive investors, like AIG, who had no alternative but to rely on the lies and omissions made,” said the complaint, being filed in the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 07:35:03

well…i guess since holder want do anything…it’s better than nothing.

 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:20:09

Massive fraud. That describes our entire business model for the last 30 years, from junk-bonds, through the DotCom maina, and then the housing bubble.

As Wall Street likes to say, the Obama administration is the biggest obsticle to business ever. Right. Business is fraud, and the Obama administration is using Dodd-Frank and the DoJ in an attempt to stop the fraud.

And Wall Street is screaming, without fraud, we can’t do businesss.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 10:58:30

AIG sues BofA?

Wow! They’ve taken irony to whole new level!

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 12:16:24

headline should have read “pot sues kettle”.

 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 07:39:30

This won’t even get interesting until we reach, wait for it…

Dow 10,000!

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 08:08:07

Give me 6500.

Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 08:49:56

I think you are right in the ballpark, I’ve thinking between 5000 & 7000.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 09:34:48

Gotta retest the lows.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:27:34

I’ll put a wager on 8000.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-08-08 11:13:55

my (FXP) is up 10% today, too bad my other stocks are down 10%.

Time to move to New Zealand and live off the land.

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2011-08-08 12:29:14

8000 is my guess, too.

 
Comment by palmetto
2011-08-08 13:22:45

palmy say, DOW 8000 or BUST!!!!!!!

Of course, let’s remember that Patrick did post a few days ago that the long term trend line is 9000. So I’ll settle for that. At least it will be realistic.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:12:07

Didn’t it settle out at around 6K around March 09 before Fed-funded stimulus rocketed it back up?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 08:09:53

“Who am I to blow against the wind?” signed: (anxiously awaiting anonymous person,… looking for x1 stock market mi$take, once again.) ;-)

 
Comment by bink
2011-08-08 08:16:49

Maybe we’ll actually see DJIA 2000 as some here predicted back in 2008. ;)

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:15:48

We’ll get QE 10 long before we get DOW 2000.

Well just remove all the leverage by growing the Fed’s balance sheet to the full $38T in business, household and federal government debt. Oh… we’ll have to add on the state and local government debt too.

Take it down to a 0 leverage ratio.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:11:04

That’s just it. The Fed would far prefer to devalue the dollar (and fixed-income retiree’s pensions) than to allow the DJIA to drop to nominal 2K.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 08:08:33

Krugman, et. al. say that we need to keep government spending to encourage an economic recovery, and to ignore the debt. That the only important number is the Debt-to-GDP ratio. If that stays low, we’re fine.

I started thinking about the numbers. Say US debt used to be at a sustainable level - say 10% of GDP. Now, it’s closing in on 100% of GDP. How long would it take us, at 5% GDP growth and zero debt growth, to get back down to 10% of GDP.

Answer: 47.5 years.

Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 08:14:18

As a followup to the comment I just posted, here are the numbers:

Starting GDP assumption = 10 (here debt would = 10% of GDP = 1)

So, now, since debt = 100% of GDP, debt is 10 as well. How long will it take GDP to grow to 100, so that a debt of 10 is back to 10%? That answer is 47-48 years.

Column 1 is GDP at start of year
Column 2 is growth rate (.05 = 5%)
Column 3 is GDP at end of year
Column 4 is year number.

10.00,|,0.05,|,10.50,|,1
10.50,|,0.05,|,11.03,|,2
11.03,|,0.05,|,11.58,|,3
11.58,|,0.05,|,12.16,|,4
12.16,|,0.05,|,12.76,|,5
12.76,|,0.05,|,13.40,|,6
13.40,|,0.05,|,14.07,|,7
14.07,|,0.05,|,14.77,|,8
14.77,|,0.05,|,15.51,|,9
15.51,|,0.05,|,16.29,|,10
16.29,|,0.05,|,17.10,|,11
17.10,|,0.05,|,17.96,|,12
17.96,|,0.05,|,18.86,|,13
18.86,|,0.05,|,19.80,|,14
19.80,|,0.05,|,20.79,|,15
20.79,|,0.05,|,21.83,|,16
21.83,|,0.05,|,22.92,|,17
22.92,|,0.05,|,24.07,|,18
24.07,|,0.05,|,25.27,|,19
25.27,|,0.05,|,26.53,|,20
26.53,|,0.05,|,27.86,|,21
27.86,|,0.05,|,29.25,|,22
29.25,|,0.05,|,30.72,|,23
30.72,|,0.05,|,32.25,|,24
32.25,|,0.05,|,33.86,|,25
33.86,|,0.05,|,35.56,|,26
35.56,|,0.05,|,37.33,|,27
37.33,|,0.05,|,39.20,|,28
39.20,|,0.05,|,41.16,|,29
41.16,|,0.05,|,43.22,|,30
43.22,|,0.05,|,45.38,|,31
45.38,|,0.05,|,47.65,|,32
47.65,|,0.05,|,50.03,|,33
50.03,|,0.05,|,52.53,|,34
52.53,|,0.05,|,55.16,|,35
55.16,|,0.05,|,57.92,|,36
57.92,|,0.05,|,60.81,|,37
60.81,|,0.05,|,63.85,|,38
63.85,|,0.05,|,67.05,|,39
67.05,|,0.05,|,70.40,|,40
70.40,|,0.05,|,73.92,|,41
73.92,|,0.05,|,77.62,|,42
77.62,|,0.05,|,81.50,|,43
81.50,|,0.05,|,85.57,|,44
85.57,|,0.05,|,89.85,|,45
89.85,|,0.05,|,94.34,|,46
94.34,|,0.05,|,99.06,|,47
99.06,|,0.05,|,104.01,|,48
104.01,|,0.05,|,109.21,|,49
109.21,|,0.05,|,114.67,|,50
114.67,|,0.05,|,120.41,|,51

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:10:20

BUT……

GDP is inflation adjusted but debt is not. Crank up the inflation rate to 10-15% for a few years. Sure, that would explode interest rates, but if a lot of our debt is locked in to long-term bonds (which we should be doing but are not), we can give ourselves… say 5 years of 15% inflation. With compounding, we’ve pretty much doubled our GDP on flat debt. Poof, 100% GDP/debt becomes 50%, and that is without any real GDP growth.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 09:14:29

Darrell for Fed Chairman!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:44:00

I am not saying this is a good course of action. I am simply saying that it is a possible course of action. Since it doesn’t require a specific vote by congress to approve it, I fear this is the most likely outcome.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 10:10:21

“Since it doesn’t require a specific vote by congress to approve it, I fear this is the most likely outcome.”

I think that’s why gold keeps going up.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-08 11:42:50

GDP is inflation adjusted but debt is not. Crank up the inflation rate to 10-15% for a few years. Sure, that would explode interest rates, but if a lot of our debt is locked in to long-term bonds (which we should be doing but are not), we can give ourselves… say 5 years of 15% inflation. With compounding, we’ve pretty much doubled our GDP on flat debt. Poof, 100% GDP/debt becomes 50%, and that is without any real GDP growth.

I thought that two years ago and posted it. I thought it was the plan to drive up housing prices and by keeping wages rising below the inflation rate to make us more competitive. However, if you think we can do it and still remain the reserve currency then I think you are wrong.

 
 
 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:13:38

What the economists fair to admit, is that one person’s money is another person’s debt.

If some people are selling more stuff than they buy (making profits and money), then someone has to be buying more than they are selling (adding debt). If we are to maintain huge corporate profits to justify stock prices, and not force the people with all the money to spend it, then someone has to be adding new net debt to the economy.

For one person to get more money, someone else has to be getting more debt. This is the fatal flaw of supply-side economics. The infinate hunger of one side of the trade to always be getting more money, is not equally offset by an infinate ability on the other person to always be adding more debt.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 10:58:18

That the only important number is the Debt-to-GDP ratio.

Gov’t spending is included in GDP. So while the ratio will rise, it will rise more slowly than it would if gov’t spending wasn’t included in GDP (as it shouldn’t be)….

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:09:37

Thanks for the simple, convincing, though grim analysis.

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-08-08 09:03:45

Is Greenspan honest to goodness this clueless? First with the “financial markets will regulate themselves” silliness, and now, “No Chance of Default, US Can Print Money” claim?

It’s not the paper dollars people want, it’s the value the paper represents to them. Currency is a virtual economic item, historically the first one. It represents value. Confidence that others view it as having value is essential. Printing money devalues the currency and shakes confidence in it.

Of course we can print enough to pay off our debts. Of course. But what people are actual concerned about is not getting a stack of paper - I have great confidence in government printing technology - but getting the value the paper represents!

It is pure sophistry to suggest the US can’t default because it can print money. It avoids the actual concern that the US will not deliver the value promised due to currency debasement.

The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default” said Greenspan on NBC’s Meet the Press

http://www.cnbc.com/id/44051683

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 09:46:06

But our debt isn’t denominated in stuffs. It is denominated in ledger transactions that we call dollars. Whether people want the ledger entries or not is irrelivant to fact that is all they are going to get.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 09:54:27

Those ledger entries are increasingly worth more and more of the lives of the American toiler. The compound interest is a bitch too.

 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 10:00:53

I did this example on another website last night.

It is 1880 in the old west and we have gold standard monetary system. I am the blacksmith and you run the saloon. A miner comes into town buys a drink with a junk of gold he just mined. The new bank that just opened up has a nice and secure vault, so you take your unit of gold and deposit it into the bank as their first and only deposit. They create a ledger entry indicating they owe you one gold.

I really want a drink, but don’t have any gold. I go to the bank and say, look I am the blacksmith and people have me shod their horses, but I need a loan right now which I will pay you back soon. The bank prints up a note that says “this note can be exchaged for one unit of gold”. It makes an entry that I owe them 1 unit of gold or note equivilant, then hands me the note.

I go into your saloon and buy a drink in exchage for the note. Again, you take the note and deposit it into your account. A ledger entry is made that no the bank owes you 2 units of gold or note equivilant.

I want a drink, but no one has come to me to get their horse shod. I go to teh bank and ask for another loan. They give me another note for another ledger entry that I owe them a unit of gold or equivilant.

I go get me that other drink, so now you have your note again. The bank owes you 3 gold, but they only have one, becasue the other 2 is what I owe them.

How do we unwind this? Well, someone, hopefully that has money, not another person borrowing your note from the bank, has to come get their horse shod by me, and give me money to pay back my debts.

If no one comes and buys from me, then I go bankrupt and the debt is written off as uncollectable. Word gets out that the bank just had to write off uncollectable debts, so everyone runs to the bank to be the first to get their money out. You show up to find that you account may say 3, but the bank, in fact, has but one unit of gold. You get your gold, but the other 2 units of money go poof when the bank ceases to exist.

In the case of FDIC, the federal government just gives you notes from their bank… but hopes not everyone goes and tries to take them all out at the same time.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:29:33

Is Greenspan honest to goodness this clueless?

Yes.

From what I’ve been able to tease out from my reading, Greenspan’s #1 skill is schmoozing. That’s right, schmoozing. Guy knows how to show up at all the right dinner parties and wow ‘em with his…

…words.

As for his skills as an economist, so-so at best.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 11:03:48

You’ve just described half of the “executive” class in this nation.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 09:10:51

West Palm Beach firm rolls out a new loan modification for underwater borrowers

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 7:44 a.m. Monday, Aug. 8, 2011

WEST PALM BEACH — Lenders have long resisted cutting loan amounts for struggling homeowners, fearing it would entice more borrowers to default.

But one locally based servicer, Ocwen Financial Corp., believes it has found a solution.

The company is rolling out a new loan modification plan for underwater borrowers that lowers the amount owed on the loan - thus reducing the monthly payment - but asks for a share in the appreciated value when the house is either sold or refinanced.

The kickback to the lender may deter people who can afford to make their payments from defaulting, while giving an incentive to either the lender or investor to modify the loan.

Called a shared appreciation modification, it’s fairly simple on its face.

A home’s principal amount is reduced to 95 percent of the current market value. That portion is forgiven in equal amounts over a three-year period as long as the owner stays current on the loan.

When the house is later either sold or refinanced, the homeowner must give the lender 25 percent of the appreciated value of the home.

For example, say the principal balance on a loan is $125,000, but the current value of the home is only $100,000. Ocwen’s plan would reduce the balance to $95,000, putting $30,000 in a non-interest-bearing account that will be forgiven over a three-year period.

If the house is later sold for $120,000 - marking an appreciation of $20,000 - the homeowner would get to keep $15,000, while $5,000 would go to the lender. If the home doesn’t appreciate, then the sale occurs as it normally would.

“You have folks breaking their necks to make payments on a home where there is no hope in their lifetime of it regaining equity,” Koches said. “A homeowner in a negative equity situation is one-and-a-half to two times more likely to go into delinquency.”

“We’ve felt for a long time that unless you do principal write-downs, you really aren’t getting at the problem,” Day said. “It’s in everyone’s best interest to keep a credit worthy person in their home.”

Diane Thompson, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center, is optimistic that Ocwen’s plan will work for many borrowers. But she has concerns that it isn’t enough for people whose home purchase was based on fraudulent appraisals that artificially hiked the value of a home.

“People who were ripped off should get more than shared appreciation or principal write-down,” she said.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/real-estate/west-palm-beach-firm-rolls-out-a-new-1710729.html - -

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 09:17:58

I wonder if any other states rely heavily on big nanny?

~ Georgia stands to
 lose in debt plan
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Georgia has increasingly used federal funding to pay for state services, but that strategy may backfire now that the president and Congress have approved a debt reduction plan.

The state government’s $37 billion overall budget is propped up with about $11 billion in federal funding, which goes towards everything from health care for the poor to historic preservation. Federal tax money has helped avoid bigger state and local government layoffs than the state has already made.

State officials know the debt deal approved last week will likely mean major cutbacks in how much money they receive from the federal government. They just don’t know when the hit will come, how much it will be, and which programs will be affected by the decision by Congress to slow the flow from the federal spigot.

“Every chance we could, we switched state [program] funds to federal funds in the budget,” said Senate Appropriations Chairman Jack Hill, R-Reidsville. “It threads its way all through our budget. Whether it’s short term or long term, cutbacks are going to touch states and they are going to touch us. Yeah, it’s scary.”

But Kelly McCutchen, president of the free market Georgia Public Policy Foundation think tank, said state services have survived past cuts in federal funding, such as the elimination this year of economic stimulus money.

“We don’t believe that the concerns with state funding should stand in the way of getting the federal government’s fiscal house in order,” he said.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 10:03:33

Getting more than they give to the federal gov is a red state tradition. It will indeed be poetic justice as the TeaKoch partiers cuts come home to roost.

They’ve treaded upon themselves.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:31:27

Those states are smack-dab in the Dummy Belt.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 11:45:00

Tankxs! Poetica!

We are a land of many ‘belts’: the Bible Belt, the Rust Belt, the Sun Belt, to name a few.

But watching the near dissolution of our political institutions and our international reputation as a scientific, medical, and cultural leader at the hands of ideologically puritanical and intellectually useless base idiots, the time has come to name another of America’s ‘belts’: the DUMMY BELT.

To identify the Dummy Belt, I selected four criteria:

* Percentage of voting population that is
evangelical
* Bachelor’s degrees per capita
* High-school drop-out rates
* Infant mortality

There are doubtless other criteria that could be used, but I selected those that seem to most directly bear on the idiocy and backwardness of a region. First, I compiled data on the percentage of the voting population of every state comprised of evangelicals. There is no better measure of idiocy than mindless religious extremism. Evangelicals manifest an admixture of willful ignorance and irredeemable stupidity found in no other bipeds on earth. :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-08-08 11:57:51

Individual poor people = impoverished, and we need to help them. My heart bleeds for the situation they have found themselves in.

Poor states: F* ‘em! They are taking our money that we worked hard for. Some of them are stupid too! They should get even less of our hard earned cash that we earned by being intelligent.

Cognitive dissonance would cause heads to explode if the world was just.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 23:22:07

Following the link to the Teap Party caucus led me to wikipedia:

“According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the top contributors to the Tea Party caucus members are health professionals, retirees, the real estate industry and oil and gas interests. “

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 10:34:00

“It will indeed be poetic justice as the TeaKoch partiers cuts come home to roost.”

I don`t have a dog in the fight but…

Tea partyers exult in Democrats’ name-calling

By Dave Boyer
The Washington Times
Updated: 8:15 p.m. on Thursday, August 4, 201

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/4/tea-party-democratic-attacks-prove-we-won-debate/ - 66k -

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 11:25:11

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

coffee4closers (comments section)

The reformation [deformation] of the GOP has begun, in earnest..Guess who leads the band? The House & Senate TEA Party Caucus’, that’s who..RINO’s are soon to be an extinct political class..Do you hear us Boehner, Cantor, McConnell, Lugar, Graham, Collins, Snowe, Kyl, McCain, Scott Brown, Chambliss, Crapo, Coburn….2010 was Act1: 2012 is the punch to your RINO guts….Bachmann, DeMint, Mike Lee, Issa, Paul Ryan, Steve King (IA) Grassley, Roscoe Bartlett, Andy Harris will be the new [cult-pledge-signers] template for the GOP going forward…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 11:11:05

Texas is a state does.

“Perfect Hair Forever” Perry made it a point over the last 3 years to reject any and all government aid for unemployment and job losses… until they found out the $25 BILLION state deficit could no longer be hidden and was going to start impacting industry.

Go on, guess what happened next…

And let’s not forget that those tax breaks for the oil industry benefit Texas more than all the other states combined.

There is so much hypocrisy in this state I’m surprised more people’s heads don’t ’splode.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 11:22:16

Remember … it’s not welfare when it benefits you!

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:35:11

Perry never actually ever rejected an Federal aid. He talked about it a lot, though.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2011-08-08 12:09:07

US oil subsidies total per year about $4billion. So if Texas gets the most, that’s like $3 billion?

Oil subsidies are like corn subsidies. Unnecessary, but hardly the monster people make them out to be.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 13:41:08

$3 billion here, $3 billion there, pretty soon you’re talking about real money.

Send it back, if it’s no big deal. I’m sure the blue states that sent it could use it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 09:26:35

Newsflash: Flash Crash is imminent.

…this one could be a 2k point drop.

Just a hunch.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 09:56:25

Just a hot flash?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:07:54

But remember the Flash Crash was down and up by roughly the same (10%) amount in the same day.

Is that what you are predicting, or is it more of a Black Monday (down 20% with long-lasting effects)?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 09:31:24

Jim Rogers: Don’t See How US Can Ever Pay Off Debts
Sunday, 7 Aug 2011 | CNBC Asia

The U.S. doesn’t deserve a AA-plus credit rating, much less triple-A, commodity bull and noted investor Jim Rogers told CNBC on Monday.

Rogers said the country was unlikely to be able to pay off its debt and Standard and Poor’s rating cut had come too late and should have happened long ago.

“It seems to me it’s physically, humanly impossible for the U.S. to ever pay off its debt [cnbc explains] ,” Rogers said. “They can roll it over and continue to play the charade, but the U.S. is bankrupt.”

Rogers’ comments came during a CNBC interview with the head of sovereign ratings at Standard and Poor’s, David Beers.

Beers said that according to S&P’s calculations, total U.S. public debt, which includes local, state and federal government debt, will be $11 trillion this year, and will rise to $14 trillion in 2015 and to $20 trillion by 2021.

To put those numbers into perspective, according to the U.S. government’s Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. annual gross domestic product (GDP) totaled $15 trillion in the second quarter of 2011.

Rogers, who has been critical of the U.S. economic policies for some time, said he remains short 30-year Treasurys [cnbc explains] , emerging markets and U.S. technology stocks but was long safe havens such as the Swiss franc, the yen and the dollar.

Rogers said he was also long commodities, especially gold and agriculture, and accepted that some of his long commodity positions may suffer in a selloff. Still, he won’t be selling.

“You should nearly always buy into panic just like you should sell hysteria,” Rogers said. “I own gold, I’m worried about gold, it’s going so up so much, I’m not going to sell it but it looks like it’s setting itself up for a nice correction. I hope so then I can buy more.”

Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 11:12:41

It can’t and never will. But that’s what world wars are for!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 09:42:35

30,000 college students kicked out of food aid program in Michigan
State’s new eligibility rules to save $75M; more students got aid than thought. - From The Detroit News

Lansing — Michigan has removed about 30,000 college students from its food stamp program — close to double the initial estimate — saving about $75 million a year, says Human Services Director Maura Corrigan.

Federal rules don’t allow most college students to collect food stamps, but Michigan had created its own rules that made nearly all students eligible, said Brian Rooney, Corrigan’s deputy director. As a result, the number of Michigan college students on this form of welfare made the state a national leader. For example, Michigan had 10 times the number of students on food stamps as either Illinois or California, Rooney said.

Cutting off the students is part of what Corrigan says is an effort to change the culture of the state’s welfare department and slash tens of millions of dollars of waste, fraud and abuse.

“Maybe (students) could go get a part-time job — that’s what I did,” said Corrigan, a former justice of the Michigan Supreme Court who attended Detroit’s Marygrove College and University of Detroit Mercy School of Law.

“We want to encourage people to be self-sufficient, not to be dependent on the government,” she said in an interview with The Detroit News.

But critics say state funding has shrunk and tuition has skyrocketed since Corrigan attended college in the late ’60s and early ’70s. They cite Michigan’s still-battered economy and say the suffering the cuts will create won’t be apparent until after cash-strapped students return to campuses this fall.

Corrigan, appointed by Republican Gov. Rick Snyder in January to head the $6.9 billion Department of Human Services, has also ordered administrators to start looking at applicants’ assets, not just their income. That move follows an uproar after it was revealed Leroy Fick of Auburn remained eligible for food stamps and continued using them after he won $2 million in the state lottery TV show “Make Me Rich!” in June 2010.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 09:58:26

“We want to encourage people to be self-sufficient, not to be dependent on the government,”

What! Now that`s just crazy talk.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2011-08-08 10:53:10

Self sufficency require a job that pays for the cost of survival in the Country the person lives in .

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:32:48

This must have been a recent development, because I sure don’t recall any of my University of Michigan classmates being on Food Stamps back in the 1970s.

Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 10:57:25

I had never heard of that either. I knew a few hungry college students that would have been all over it, if it had been available those years ago.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-08 11:15:55

Well, if you’re really that poor you’d qualify for grants. At the college my daughter attends in Greeley the “less fortunate” students get all kinds of grants and scholarships, even if they are C students.

When we did our research into private scholarships we found that about 80% of them target students from “disadvantaged” backgrounds. Of the remaining 20%, most were super specialized: Only for students from county X, for people majoring in unusual courses of studies, etc.

Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:39:25

Very few students have assets that allow them to live large. Most live off the largeness of thier parents. Grants take this into account until age 26.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 11:40:42

At the college my daughter attends in Greeley the “less fortunate” students get all kinds of grants and scholarships, even if they are C students.

If I were the funder of a grant or a scholarship, I’d be all over the kids’ transcripts like white on rice. Nothing less than a B, kids.

And, yes, this includes the “hard” courses. Because nothing makes a “hard” course easier like really throwing yourself into the studying, going to the prof’s office hours, and going to class and paying attention.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Elanor
2011-08-08 11:40:21

I did know a pair of brothers in the 1970s who both worked at a Ford plant during the summers and were laid off before college started in the fall. Then they collected unemployment throughout the school year. Their father must have known someone at Ford. That was a lucrative scam they had going.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 13:47:00

It’s illegal to collect UE while you’re in school, although I’m sure people lie and do it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by howiewowie
2011-08-08 18:28:33

They made that legal after the unemployment rate started skyrocketing in 2008 or 09.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-08-08 18:31:54

Alpha its NOT illegal to collect while going to school…if you are already registered and paid at least a non refundable deposit for the classes.. or actually in classes BEFORE you get laid off….but you still have to make your 3-4 job searches a week to collect.

Fine line there…plus your going to classes cannot have any bearing on why you got fired.

 
 
 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 11:08:41

If we want people to be self sufficient, then we have to create an environment where their wages are sufficinet for them to be self sufficient. Of course, that will hurt corporate profits and we can’t have that.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 11:42:56

“If we want people to be self sufficient, then we have to create an environment where their wages are sufficinet for them to be self sufficient.”

(this looked good right up to the last line)

No matter what kind of pioneer he or she was, they had to rely on themselves and the land to stay alive. It’s amazing how ingenious these people were. They took advantage of the plentiful wild game and fruits, nuts, plants and trees growing in the wilderness. They built their homes and furniture by splitting trees. They tapped syrup from the trees in the spring to make maple syrup. Salt was obtained by boiling the water of saline springs.

Their way of life was filled with work and chores. The women crafted household goods such as pails and dippers out of the gourds that grew around them. They made soap from wood ash and molded candles from tallow. Clothes were made from wool and linen and animal skins that were tanned. They hunted for game, worked in the fields and split rails to make fences. They also had to take care of their livestock.

The children worked just a hard as their parents. The girls mended clothes, baked, made soup and candles, pounded dried corn to make cornmeal and helped their mothers. The boys learned to fell timber and split wood for the fire. They hauled water from a nearby stream, hoed in the fields and helped their fathers with other chores. It was both the boy’s and girl’s responsibility to chase animals such as deer, squirrels and rabbits from the cornfield.

Pioneer families were normally large, and usually there was always a young child in the family. They needed large families to help out on their homesteads. Neighbors were pretty much essential and were valued on the frontier. House- raising, log rolling, barn- raising and hunts were a community affair.

When we look back at these rugged pioneer people, it’s hard to believe that they survived! But they did, and they paved the way for future generations to form our land to become what it is today.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/122607/the_pioneer_way_of_life_in_america.html - 29k -

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 12:41:44

No matter what kind of pioneer he or she was, they had to rely on themselves and the land to stay alive. It’s amazing how ingenious these people were. They took advantage of the plentiful wild game and fruits, nuts, plants and trees growing in the wilderness. They built their homes and furniture by splitting trees. They tapped syrup from the trees in the spring to make maple syrup. Salt was obtained by boiling the water of saline springs.

Their way of life was filled with work and chores. The women crafted household goods such as pails and dippers out of the gourds that grew around them. They made soap from wood ash and molded candles from tallow. Clothes were made from wool and linen and animal skins that were tanned. They hunted for game, worked in the fields and split rails to make fences. They also had to take care of their livestock.

This is one of the points that Rob Hopkins makes in his book, The Transition Handbook. It’s about making a better world for ourselves as we go through climate change and peak oil.

The Handbook talks a lot about “skilling up for powering down.” And makes it sound like a rollicking good time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 13:05:49

“Their way of life was filled with work and chores.”

I guess they didn`t have anyone to create an environment where their wages were sufficinet for them to be self sufficient.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 23:38:37

They didn’t have to buy the land.

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-08-08 13:27:06

Another meme from the “walked uphill through blizzards” to school crowd.

Yeah, they were being pioneers. And they weren’t going to college. Of working in IT. Or fixing airplanes, for that matter.

If anyone thinks pioneer living was so great, there’s plenty of places you can move out here in Flyover where you can recreate the experience. Hell, if you pi$$ed off enough of them, I’ll bet you could even come up with some Sioux war parties. Tell them about all your gold coins.

Me, I sorta like living in the 21st century.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 13:36:18

Another meme from the “walked uphill through blizzards” to school crowd.

Well, my mother did walk through blizzards to get to school. She’s from Buffalo, NY.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-08 23:39:51

I walked uphill both ways - literally. :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 11:18:07

Maybe they can get jobs at the Koch’s newly privatized, no bid, former state owned, power plants?

Comment by CrackerJim
2011-08-08 12:33:39

Just how many instances of that have occurred, not conjectured?

 
 
Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-08-08 11:19:35

A job? Where? 40 year olds took those.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 10:05:25

The DOW is holding up nicely today.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 10:36:38

“Utilized Chao$” can be rewarding, or one could just do nothing. :-)

signed: anxiously awaiting anonymous person

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 10:06:14

“Boycott ‘em!” (& their Fee$ible Opinion$) :-)

S&P is a bad joke
By Jonathan Bernstein / Washington Post

This is about the rating agency, not the US budget or political system. For those who believe that this downgrade had anything to do with the federal budget situation and actual debt levels: c’mon, get serious. S&P made a political argument, not an economic one. Besides, the “Obama Downgrade” really makes no sense; after all, Obama had a lot more to say about budgets and deficits in 2009-2010, and there wasn’t even a hint of a downgrade then. Now, it is true that electing a whole bunch of Republicans who (rhetoric notwithstanding) are far more interested in low tax rates than they are in the deficit probably is correctly assessed as harming future fiscal balance, but it’s hard to see how that’s Barack Obama’s fault.

$tandard & knotPoor, one of the three main credit-rating agencies, “True$editionist$$erialEnabler$™”

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 10:10:50

Has S&P grown a pair, or are they just covering their a$$ as the downdraft picks up speed?

S&P Lowers Fannie, Freddie Citing Reliance on Government

(Bloomberg) — Standard & Poor’s lowered credit ratings for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other lenders backed by the federal government. The U.S.-sponsored mortgage finance companies were lowered one step from AAA to AA+, and S&P said the downgrade reflects the companies’ “direct reliance of the U.S. government.” S&P lowered the U.S. credit rating on Aug. 5. (Source: Bloomberg)

Standard & Poor’s lowered credit ratings on debt issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other lenders backed by the federal government, citing the U.S. loss of its AAA status.

The mortgage finance companies were lowered one step from AAA to AA+, S&P said in a statement today. The downgrade reflects their “direct reliance on the U.S. government,” S&P said.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into government conservatorship in September 2008 as losses tied to subprime mortgage lending pushed them toward insolvency. Since then, the two government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, have drawn almost $170 billion in federal aid. The GSEs own or guarantee more than half of U.S. mortgage debt.

The downgrades of Washington-based Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac of McLean, Virginia, and other government-backed debt was predicted by some analysts after S&P lowered the U.S. sovereign credit rating by one level on Aug. 5. On Friday, banking regulators including the Federal Deposit Insurace Corp. said that government-issued securities would be “unaffected” by the sovereign downgrade.

Yields on GSE bonds jumped to their highest relative to U.S. Treasuries in more than two years. The downgrade was only part of the reason for the wider spreads, said Walt Schmidt, a mortgage strategist in Chicago at FTN Financial, in a note to clients. He said the spreads are “based on uncertainties regarding prepayments and supply, not credit-based downgrade fears.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 10:35:07

Has S&P grown a pair, or are they just covering their a$$ as the downdraft picks up speed?

I think that they’re in posterior-covering mode. Especially since Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders called ‘em out.

Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 11:24:23

Now what makes you think something like that? :lol:

 
 
Comment by rms
2011-08-08 12:11:27

You have to be a team player…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vhv8cW5sAo

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 10:28:34

Is the U.S. Credit Rating a Victim of GOP Sabotage? ;-)

By Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance.| Contrary Indicator – Fri, Aug 5, 2011

The fiscal clown show continues.

It has long been obvious to all observers — to economists, to politicians, to anti-deficit groups, to the ratings agencies — that closing fiscal gaps will require tax increases, or the closure of big tax loopholes, or significant tax reform that will raise significantly larger sums of tax revenue than the system does now. Today, taxes as a percentage of GDP are at historic lows. Marginal rates on income and investments are at historic lows. Corporate tax receipts as a percentage of GDP are at historic lows. Perhaps taxes don’t need to rise this year or next, but they do need to go up in the future.

Otherwise, the math of deficit reduction simply doesn’t work. And that’s how the deficit reduction deals signed off on by Repubican presidents like Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush came about.

Yet the action in Washington in the past year has all gone in the opposite direction. President Obama deserves some of the blame. Several months ago, he struck a deal with Congress to make the fiscal situation worseextending the Bush $hrub tax cuts Gift$ for two more years and enacting a temporary cut in the payroll tax.

But Congressional Republicans deserve much more of the blame. For this calamity was entirely man-made even intentional. The contemporary Republican Party is fixated on taxes. It possesses an iron-clad belief that the existing tax rates should never go up, that loopholes shouldn’t be closed unless they’re offset by other tax reductions, that the fact that hedge fund managers pay lower tax rates than school teachers makes complete sense, that a reversion to the tax rates of the prosperous 1990’s or 1980’s would be unacceptable.

In the past two years, this attitude has combined with a general hostility to playing ball with Democrapts on large legislative issues, a near-blanket refusal to conduct business with President Obama, and, since the arrival of the raucous Tea Party freshman, a cavalier attitude toward the nation’s obligations. It was common to hear duly elected legislators argue that it wouldn’t be a big deal if the government were to pierce the debt ceiling and default on its debts.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-08-08 10:30:58

With S&P downgrading Fannie and Freddie this morning, what will that mean to us home buyers who are waiting for the right house to show up?

Higher interest rates?
Underwriting standards tightened some?
Lower prices with more inventory?

Realology(sp?) the owner of the Coldwell Banker and C21 franchises wants a Housing Summit in the WH. (I read this as no freakin inventory=they’re sinking) They want the banks to release some inventory.

Are things lining us for us buyers by fall?

Comment by ecofeco
2011-08-08 11:27:57

The Savings & Loan crisis wasn’t really over until the banks cried uncle and finally started unloading properties like watermelons from the back of farm trucks on the side of the road.

Literally.

It will be the same this time.

By the end of the eyar? I doubt it, but this is a sign we’re getting there.

Comment by Steve J
2011-08-08 11:41:32

It wasn’t over until the first bank execs went to prison.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 11:49:10

According to William K. Black’s book, The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One, those prison sentences took a while to happen. But there were more than 1,000.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by rms
2011-08-08 12:04:21

+1 I remember when Alan Cranston’s chit didn’t stink. The Cranston family is hiding these days, just like Dubya.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Awaiting
2011-08-08 13:41:55

ecofeco,AzSlim,Steve J, & rms
Thanks for the replies. I appreciated them. You see, we have a cash flow crunch, but the money for the house is stashed, so the sooner we buy (cash) the sooner we stablize the cash flow issue. (Glaucoma & Eye Virus issue)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:02:19

“Higher interest rates?”

When have depressionary conditions ever led to higher interest rates? I foresee lower interest rates and home prices twelve months from now.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 10:38:28

I notice Lurch Kerry has been out whining and crying more than usual…

Democrats seek to pin credit downgrade on tea party
Partisan gridlock is real culprit, S&P says (Associated Press)

While continuing to cast doubt on the credibility of Standard & Poor’s, several Democrats on Sunday said there is an even greater culprit in the downgrade of the nation’s credit rating: the tea party.

“I believe this is, without question, the tea party downgrade,” Sen. John F. Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, a day that also saw mounting anxieties in world markets over the downgrade among myriad other economic woes worldwide. Some of the world’s top financial ministers issued a joint statement Sunday night committing themselves to preserve the stability of financial markets and their economies.

David Axelrod, a former senior adviser to President Obama, used the exact same phrase in dubbing the credit rating drop the “tea party downgrade,” as Democrats tried to position themselves as reasonable, pragmatic leaders and conservative Republicans as irresponsible ideologues who caused the downgrade by refusing to accept any new taxes.

That’s exactly the kind of blame game that led Standard & Poor’s, one of three key credit-ratings agencies, to strip the U.S. federal government of its AAA status Friday night and reducing it to AA+ for the first time in the nation’s history.

“Congress and the administration are jointly responsible for the conduct of fiscal policy. So, this is not really about either political party,” David Beers, the head of S&P’s government debt-rating unit, said during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday.”

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 11:05:54

How do we expect to address our issues if we are not willing to accept that profits are a direct result of an underlying imbalance of trade that generates money and debt.

Money can not continue to be borrowed into existance as is needed for the profits to continue, if the borrowers are tapped out and can’t keep taking on more debt?

 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 10:43:45

Obama speech delayed…

Rome burns, while Barry takes a $hit.

Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-08-08 11:26:32

Do you think Obama can fix this mess? What do you suggest he does?

Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 12:01:54

Get a job. (a different one)

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 12:20:05

Lil’ Opie should watch as the 20th Maine Regiment fix their bayonet$ for a counter attack! / Vote! :-)

Wisconsin recall elections carry implications for 2012:
Six Republican state senators are being challenged in the latest fallout from the passage of anti-union legislation. The races are seen as test battles for the presidential and congressional election next year.

By Rick Pearson, Chicago Tribune / August 6, 2011

Pasch maintains that Darling and Walker have pushed through, “in a very rapid way, an extreme agenda, undoing years of Wisconsin history in a very short time.” Darling, she said, had been viewed as a moderate Republican early in her career, but “she has been sliding to the right and I don’t think she can go further right.”

Darling counters that Pasch and her union supporters are trying to flip the results of last November’s election, which the GOP [“TrueReduceTheDeficitNow!! Today!™”] interpreted as a demand by voters to eliminate the state’s budget deficit and rein in spending.

 
Comment by howiewowie
2011-08-08 18:30:26

He should snap his fingers to fix everything like Bachmann says she can do.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2011-08-08 10:50:22

When they have more panic about a drop in the Dow to the point where the President must speak soon ,rather than panic when the job loss numbers come out bad ,than you know the priorities of
this Nation are retarted . Again I say ,you can’t have a economy that revolves around investments and bubbles rather than jobs and
production.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 11:02:47

But that would require the people with money to start buying more than they sell… meaning negative profits. We can not have that.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-08-08 11:05:34

Speeches like this are to keep the typical middle class family from freaking out. Such speeches mean nothing to the homeless down in the park, or the plugged in rich for that matter. So in a way, this is tacit admission that the PTB need the beleagured middle class more than the beaten up middle class needs the PTB.

 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 11:19:28

Oh, another -500 day. I’m betting margin calls are flying again!

Wonder if the Tea Party people would go along with a TARP 2.0?

Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 11:59:47

I’m betting margin calls are flying again!

and yet gold and silver are both up significantly…

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-08-08 13:33:30

Gold appears to be doing better than it did during the last meltdown. I wonder why?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 14:30:58

I wonder why?

less leveraged speculation? I don’t know…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 11:08:35

For once I have to agree with this old windbag. Ron Paul has been saying this for years.

Dem: US credit down because of military spending

WASHINGTON (AP) — The senior Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee says the biggest reason the United States is seeing its credit downgraded is that it spends too much money being “the military policemen of the world.”

Rep. Barney Frank tells CBS’s “The Early Show” that reining in defense spending is “going to be my mantra” for the next few months.

The liberal Massachusetts Democrat says $200 billion could be saved “without in any way endangering our security” by dialing back U.S. military involvement in the world, including operations in Western Europe. Frank says the military establishment has always had this “great momentum” in politics, but says the credit reversal “could change our thinking.” Frank calls the military a logical target “if we’re looking for something that breaks the mold” on spending.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 11:21:50

I am sure that cutting military spending and laying off people will be wonderful for the economy and peoples’ ability to pay back their debts while continuing to buy to keep corporate profits up.

Do we need to cut spending? OH YEAH. Is that alone going to fix our problmes? Nope. In the short-term, it is going to make them much worse.

Comment by AV0CAD0
2011-08-08 11:29:23

Wow. there is no solution.

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 12:03:00

On the contrary, there are several solutions. The longer we postpone, the worse they get.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 11:30:04

“In the short-term, it is going to make them much worse”.

Well putting off the inevitable over and over and over again, makes the pain at the end of the road far worse. The time has long passed for the U.S. to step up and show some responsibility for decades of irresponsibility.

The debt must be paid one way or the other, and it will be.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 11:16:26

Weiss Ratings Credits S&P for Important First Step;
Renews Challenge to Moody’s and Fitch to Downgrade U.S. Debt

JUPITER, Florida (August 8, 2011) — Weiss Ratings, the nation’s leading independent rating agency of U.S. financial institutions, credits Standard & Poor’s for taking an important first step in the right direction, while renewing its public challenge to Moody’s and Fitch to downgrade the long-term debt of the U.S. government.

The Weiss Ratings Challenge, reissued today, was initially made to all three credit rating agencies on May 10, 2010, or 15 months before S&P announced its downgrade of U.S. debt from AAA to AA+ last Friday.

Weiss Ratings president Dr. Martin D. Weiss commented: “S&P deserves credit for breaking with nearly a century of precedent and focusing the world’s attention on the urgency of this problem. However, we do not believe a one-notch downgrade adequately reflects the rapid deterioration of the nation’s finances since the debt crisis of 2008.”

Although a downgrade can have negative short-term repercussions, Weiss believes the consequences of procrastination can be far more serious, while an honest rating can be constructive for the country in the long term. Addressing the major credit rating agencies, he wrote:

“To the degree that you continue to reaffirm stellar ratings for U.S. debt, you help entice millions of hard-working citizens, retirees, and their intermediaries to pour more money into a potential debt trap; or at best, to be severely underpaid for the actual risks they are taking. You give policymakers a green light to perpetuate their fiscal follies, further degrading our government’s ability to meet future obligations. And you help create a false sense of security overall — the recipe for a possible meltdown in the market for U.S. sovereign debts.”

On April 28, 2011, 15 months after issuing its initial challenge to the major ratings agencies, Weiss Ratings introduced the Weiss Sovereign Debt Ratings, giving the United States a grade of C, and subsequently, with its release of July 15, 2011, Weiss Ratings downgraded U.S. debt to C- (approximately equivalent to a BBB- at S&P).

Weiss Ratings senior financial analyst Gavin Magor commented: “The U.S. is facing some of its greatest financial challenges of modern times, while global investors continue to take very substantial risks when buying medium- and long-term U.S. government securities. These include the risks of currency devaluation, reduced bond market liquidity, bond price declines, and rapidly escalating costs of insuring against a possible future default.”

Today, Weiss Ratings reaffirmed its C- rating of U.S. medium- and long-term debt. Among the 49 sovereign nations covered, the United States continues to score very low in terms of its debt burdens, macro-economic trends, and international stability, while still getting a relatively high grade for the broad acceptance and marketability of its debt securities.

About Weiss Ratings:
Weiss Ratings is the nation’s leading independent provider of bank, credit union and insurance company financial strength ratings, accepting no payments for its ratings from rated institutions. Weiss Ratings also provides debt ratings on 49 sovereign nations.

 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 11:19:45

“Could be” Nope, it will be.

- Second Recession in U.S. Could Be Worse Than First
nytimes

If the economy falls back into recession, as many economists are now warning, the bloodletting could be a lot more painful than the last time around.

Given the tumult of the Great Recession, this may be hard to believe. But the economy is much weaker than it was at the outset of the last recession in December 2007, with most major measures of economic health — including jobs, incomes, output and industrial production — worse today than they were back then. And growth has been so weak that almost no ground has been recouped, even though a recovery technically started in June 2009.

“It would be disastrous if we entered into a recession at this stage, given that we haven’t yet made up for the last recession,” said Conrad DeQuadros, senior economist at RDQ Economics.

When the last downturn hit, the credit bubble left Americans with lots of fat to cut, but a new one would force families to cut from the bone. Making things worse, policy makers used most of the economic tools at their disposal to combat the last recession, and have few options available.

Anxiety and uncertainty have increased in the last few days after the decision by Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the country’s credit rating and as Europe continues its desperate attempt to stem its debt crisis.

President Obama acknowledged the challenge in his Saturday radio and Internet address, saying the country’s “urgent mission” now was to expand the economy and create jobs. And Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in an interview on CNBC on Sunday that the United States had “a lot of work to do” because of its “long-term and unsustainable fiscal position.”

But he added, “I have enormous confidence in the basic regenerative capacity of the American economy and the American people.”

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 12:52:04

Someday people will accept that this is not 2 recessions, but one solvancy depression. Yes, we may have had a few quarters of growth, but that was simply delay of the inevitable as we do not want to accept inevitable natural rebalancing of the economy.

For 30 years we’ve created an environment where some entities could sell way more than they were buying, buy allowing other entities to buy way more than they were selling. This was done though debt increasing at 3x the sustainable level. That debt can not be paid back until the entities start buying more than they are selling, so that the people in debt can begin selling more than they are buying. OR… the debt will have to be writtin off as uncollectable and the money will just go away.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-08-08 13:18:36

Nobody outside of NYC or Washington thinks we’re having “two recessions”.

 
Comment by michael
2011-08-08 14:09:02

2 recessions?

try 3 or more…the dot com collapse showed the cracks.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 11:36:38

Explosive Jackie O tapes ‘reveal how she believed Lyndon B Johnson killed JFK.

Former first lady Jackie Kennedy is said to have made the tapes within months of JFK’s assassination

Jackie Onassis believed that Lyndon B Johnson and a cabal of Texas tycoons were involved in the assassination of her husband John F Kennedy, ‘explosive’ recordings are set to reveal.

The secret tapes will show that the former first lady felt that her husband’s successor was at the heart of the plot to murder him.

She became convinced that the then vice president, along with businessmen in the South, had orchestrated the Dallas shooting, with gunman Lee Harvey Oswald – long claimed to have been a lone assassin – merely part of a much larger conspiracy.

Texas-born Mr Johnson, who served as the state’s governor and senator, completed Mr Kennedy’s term and went on to be elected president in his own right.

The tapes were recorded with leading historian Arthur Schlesinger Jnr within months of the assassination on November 22, 1963, and had been sealed in a vault at the Kennedy Library in Boston.

The then Mrs Kennedy, who went on to marry Greek shipping tycoon Aristotle Onassis, had ordered that they should not be released until 50 years after her death, with some reports suggesting she feared that her revelations might make her family targets for revenge.

She died 17 years ago from cancer aged 64 and now her daughter, Caroline Kennedy, has agreed to release the recordings early.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2023418/Jackie-O-tapes-reveal-JFKs-affairs-believed-death.html#ixzz1USp6Gxqu

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-08-08 12:40:51

JFK assassination: Secret Service Standdown

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8 - 114k -

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 12:45:31

The secret tapes will show that the former first lady felt that her husband’s successor was at the heart of the plot to murder him.

She became convinced that the then vice president, along with businessmen in the South, had orchestrated the Dallas shooting, with gunman Lee Harvey Oswald – long claimed to have been a lone assassin – merely part of a much larger conspiracy.

Lest we dismiss this as yet another JFK conspiracy theory — and brush Jackie off as a ditzy dame who’s feeling mixed emotions after the death of a guy who cheated on her — keep in mind that Jackie was a pretty smart lady. Because she was pretty and the First Lady, she was often underestimated.

It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out.

Comment by CharlieTango
2011-08-08 15:39:58

Blood-Money-Power-L-B-J-Killed J-F-K

great read, convinced me

 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-08-08 11:37:29

Do you guys think we will default?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 11:47:20

Argentina did a decade ago. Last I heard, that country was doing just fine.

Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 13:00:19

Not what I hear. But Argentina and pre-Lula Brazil are good indicators of where were are going. Brazil is doing fine after a couple of lost decades.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 13:20:23

To hear it from our very own Rio, Brazil is doing a lot of things right.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by pdmseatac
2011-08-08 14:31:59

My wife is Chilean, and we travel there a lot. Argentina is still quite turbulent from what I have seen, unlike Chile.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 15:09:50

I would attribute some of this turbulence to the Argentines themselves. You know how we sometimes call people drama queens or kings?

Well, meet Argentina, the drama capital of South America.

How do I know this? Through a friend of one of my neighbors. He’s Argentine on his mother’s side.

He says that Argentina is a great place to be if you’re a shrink. It seems as if the whole country’s in therapy or has been there.

On the national level, he characterizes Argentines as being bitter because their country isn’t in Europe.

And, silly me, I had to go and repeat this to another acquaintance who’s from (you guessed it) Buenos Aires. She hotly disagreed with his assessment of the Argentine national character. (Detect a bit of turbulence? I sure did!)

 
Comment by pdmseatac
2011-08-08 17:52:46

I absolutely agree, the Argentine character tends to be like that. We have lots of Argentine friends ( they go in and out of Chile quite freely ). There are a lot of people there descended from Italians; their version of Spanish even sounds vaguely Italian, and they act like you might expect Italians to: voluble, extravagantly emotional, gesticulating, egotistical, stylish, etc. My wife loves this and likes to visit Buenos Aires whenever she has a chance.

 
 
 
 
Comment by liz pendens
2011-08-08 12:00:08

I think Geithner will not make it until friday. (before getting fired)

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 12:00:41

This old hunter tracked a panther years ago for two days, following the tracks in the snow. On the second day it dawned on me that she was hunting me.

It is possible that these signals (flags) that are being shown point away from what is going to happen.

 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 12:44:50

We will not default. We will take the path of leaset resistance, in my opinion. That is to neither cut spending significantly, nor eaise taxes, instead we will just get the Federal Reserve to buy our debt, causing inflation.

Only after a substantial time of run-away inflation will we actually begin to worry about the underlying problems of trade imbalnce, both internationally and domestically.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-08-08 13:08:29

Nah.

Tea Party forced a political power play, and S&P called their bluff. Too many Really Big Players would lose bucketloads on a default. I think this is just grandstanding for a technical reset to 10,000.

‘Course, if BAC gets a bailout, the TeaParty will go rabid and all bets are off….

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 13:37:40

Looks like the market’s giving BAC the finger.

 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-08-08 15:32:30

the house ( read tea party ) submitted a budget, deficit reduction plans, even plans to raise the debt ceiling.

the opposition, barry and harry agreed to not even consider them.

barry’s got a lot of power, serious bills by the house should get to be heard in the senate but we have the 3rd branch controlling 1/2 of the 2nd.

the dems haven’t submitted a budget in years, barry submitted one that was so harmful the senate voted it down 97-0

i don’t buy your contention that the tea party forced a power play, the tea party has now power yet.

Comment by howiewowie
2011-08-08 18:34:26

And what didn’t the House (tea party) consider. More revenue.

What’s the difference?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2011-08-08 14:08:28

I do. Bye bye, big playas. HAHAHAHAHAHa.

Damn it feels good to hate a banksta.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 11:41:51

The NYSE is getting it’s butt cut this afternoon.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 12:53:08

-600 and counting on the DOW

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:11:52

Center City Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia, Curfew, Flash Mobs, KYW

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) - Mayor Michael Nutt today announced a tighter weekend curfew in the Center City and University City regions of the city, as he continues grappling with the threat of “flash mobs” in Philadelphia.

Nutter today described those engaging in flash mob rampages as “a tiny minority of ignorant, reckless fools.”

Then, flanked by dozens of law enforcement and community leaders, he spelled out a substantive (though temporary) change in the city’s curfew for two key areas — Center City and University City — on Friday and Saturday nights.

Anyone under 18 in those areas must now be off the streets by 9 PM.

And when parents come to pick up curfew violators, the mayor said, they’ll be told to keep track of the child.

“If you don’t even bother to pick up your child, we are immediately calling the Department of Human Services, and you can then be taken to court for other violations including neglect of your child,” he warned.

Comment by CrackerBob
2011-08-08 12:21:24

“A tiny minority”! Were they Anglo-Saxon or Jews? Maybe Japanese? Anybody?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 12:48:57

University City? I know that area well. It’s where the University of Pennsylvania is. A few blocks to the west, you’re in one of the nastiest ghettoes around.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 12:22:18

I have a suggestion for those folks (and there are some) who whine that New York City has been “Disneyfied” and isn’t cool like it was in the 1970s.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 12:50:54

I was a college intern in NYC during the summer of 1978. Boy, was it a hostile town.

I remember being hollered at by some guy who thought I looked at his girlfriend funny. (All I was doing was changing my facial expression.) Fortunately, Mr. Hothead moved on. And was I relieved.

Went back to NYC in early 2002, and was floored by how polite the place was.

 
Comment by Pendulum
2011-08-08 20:35:30

Go to East New York? BedStuy?

 
 
Comment by Montana
2011-08-08 15:12:19

Can’t hear you, la-la-la…

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:22:55

“What Obama fails to understand, and it means he’s a 1-term president, is that the markets are rigged. So saying that ‘markets believe we’re still AAA’ is like saying the tooth fairy is real. To say Obama’s delusional does not even begin to address the problem”. -Max Kieser

Obama: “No Matter What Some Agency May Say, We’ve Always Been And Always Will Be A ‘Triple-A’ Country” (BI)

President Barack Obama addressed the S&P downgrade in a statement to the American people Monday, saying “no matter what some agency may say, we’ve always been and always will be a AAA country.”

He called the action by S&P “a warning” and called on the “Super Committee” on deficit reduction to reach a compromise on reforming taxes and Medicare.

Obama added that the downgrade was a reflection of the ratings agency’s doubt in “our political system’s ability to act” to rein in growing deficits.

He called on Congress to quickly pass an increase to the payroll tax cut set to expire next month, warning it could cost as many as 1 million jobs.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 12:38:59

The president has 2 competing jobs. He has to inform, but he also has to cheerlead.

If he came out and said, “oh, we’re so toast”, would that really be productive?

Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 14:49:52

but he also has to cheerlead.

Can you point to that part of the job description in the Constitution? I must have missed that part…

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 15:05:21

Cheerleading is the interpretive dance version of leadership.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 15:11:16

I’m well acquainted with the wife of Bob Walkup, who’s the mayor of Tucson.

You haven’t met a Tucson cheerleader until you’ve met Bob. Or his wife, Beth.

It’s part of the job, folks.

 
 
Comment by howiewowie
2011-08-08 18:36:28

Gimme a break. Every president is like this. It’s also not in the Constitution that the president has to fly in Air Force One or live on the second floor of the White House….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2011-08-08 14:01:56

“…and always will be”

hubris

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:29:08

S&P downgrades roll on: Insurers whacked

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — The credit ratings of five major insurance companies were whacked by Standard and Poor’s on Monday as the rating agency systematically downgraded debt that is closely linked to the federal government.

The latest victims are insurers Knights of Columbus, New York Life, Northwestern Mutual, Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America and United Services Automobile Association.

The ratings were moved from AAA to AA+, and S&P assigned a negative outlook, which means another downgrade could take place in the next few years. (Read: Treasuries are safe. Sorta)

At the same time, S&P affirmed the AA+ rating on Assured Guaranty (AGO), Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Guardian, Massachusetts Mutual and Western & Southern — but lowered their outlook from stable to negative.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 13:31:47

“Boycott ‘em!” (& their Fee$ible Opinion$) :-)

McGraw-Hill owns Standard & Poor’s, educational publisher McGraw-Hill Education, Platts energy information services and J.D. Power and Associates

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

Shares of McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. fell $3.22

NEW YORK (AP) — McGraw-Hill took a little friendly fire Monday, seeing its stock tumble nearly 8 percent after its Standard & Poor’s agency downgraded the U.S. government’s credit rating, helping to send the market into a tailspin.

“These f@!king Guys!,” Jon Stewart.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:31:25

You can bet the howls for QE-3 will be out in full force now!

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2011-08-08 12:33:46

A flash mob is cool and entertaining everywhere but in Philly. I am embarrassed for my city of brotherly…love?

Comment by eastcoaster
2011-08-08 12:35:07

Ooops…meant to post under wmbz’s post.

 
Comment by Montana
2011-08-08 15:04:53

I guess you don’t mean this kind of flashmob.
http://violentflashmobs.com/

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 15:39:02

Interesting that the Pittsburgh mob happened right after a church picnic. And the flash-mobbers were attending said picnic.

Back when I lived in Pittsburgh, there were groups of unemployed people who made a habit of disrupting the church services of the wealthy and powerful.

Nothing like rubbing their noses in the Gospel. Especially the part about (paraphrasing Jesus speaking) “Doing unto the least of you being the same as doing unto me.”

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:37:23

Legal Aid of NC closing 3 offices and cutting 30 positions
newsobserver.com

Facing budget cuts of more than $2 million, Legal Aid of North Carolina plans to eliminate about 30 positions and close its offices in Smithfield, Boone and Henderson by the end of September.

Those three offices have served about 2,000 households a year in Johnston, Harnett, Sampson, Allegheny, Ashe, Avery, Mitchell, Watauga, Wilkes, Vance and Yancey counties.

The nonprofit looked at furloughs and salary cuts but the reductions in funding were too great, said George Hausen, Legal Aid of North Carolina’s executive director.

Legal Aid’s total budget had been around $20 million a year before the cuts.

By closing rural offices, Legal Aid hopes to maximize the number of poor people it serves at its current funding level.

“We serve poor people, and in the rural areas we have to travel a much greater distance to serve fewer people,” Hausen said. “In order to keep the numbers high and serve as many poor people as we possibly could we decided that we needed to circle the wagons in the big, urban offices.”

Legal Aid of North Carolina has about 150 lawyers on staff who assist more than 40,000 low and moderate-income households with various legal matters each year. In recent years, the organization has been heavily involved in providing mortgage assistance to people facing foreclosure.

Those programs have been spared from cuts, Hausen said.

Legal Aid gets its funding from a range of sources, but its biggest sources are the state and federal governments, which have been cutting spending in a range of areas. Some of Legal Aid’s funding is also tied to commercial real estate transactions, which are down significantly in recent years.

The cuts come at a time when there is increased demand for Legal Aid’s services as a result of the economic downturn.

“Even under the best funding that we had we’re still turning away over half the clients who apply to us with good cases,” Hausen said. “We have a burgeoning poverty population here in North Carolina and we’re cutting these services at a very critical time.”

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 12:59:16

We can not cut our way out of this any more than we can spend our way out.

We have to attack the underlying trade imbalance, both internationally and domestically. We need the rich to start getting poorer so the poor can get out of debt. Whether that is done through encouraging spending, or taxation, or flat out default and writing off the debt, does not matter. Until we attack the underlying problem, everything else is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic as the first class passengers sail away in the only life boats.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 13:26:56

your analagy of the titanic with respect to rich and poor is understood and it does illustrate a valid point…however…there were alot of us who put on our life jackets and headed for a lifeboat in a prudent and orderly fashion while alot of those “rich” and “poor” where doing jello shots off strippers asses in the lower decks. i could either row off in my half full lifeboat or go down with a bunch of fools.

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 14:02:45

And what is your “half-full lifeboat”? Guns, lots of ammo, and a bunker in the woods that is full of canned food?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 14:52:14

so the poor can get out of debt

Or perhaps the poor should simply drown in their bad decisions.

The rich don’t have to do anything to make up for bad decisions made by others. Sorry, it’s not my fault I was cautious while others weren’t.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 15:06:46

“Or perhaps the poor should simply drown in their bad decisions.”

You’ll find they won’t drown without dragging down everyone else.

Would you really prefer to live in a country that allows people to starve to death, rather than pay a few more points in income taxes?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 15:35:34

Would you really prefer to live in a country that allows people to starve to death, rather than pay a few more points in income taxes?

How many times does that argument need to be used to raise taxes?

Sure, I’m all for that. But we pay more than enough in taxes to cover that right now.

So we raise taxes, and throw a few pennies their way. And then they can now make even MORE bad decisions (ie eat out yet another night a week, get a newer iPhone, etc)…and we’re back at square one. When does it stop?

If someone is poor, not due to poor decisions, and truly cannot afford food? Sure. But what percentage of “poor” in this country fall in that category? What percentage never eat out, don’t have any consumer electronics, live in an efficiency apartment, don’t have kids, take on as much work as they can find, only buy stuff when it’s on sale (when possible), etc?

Note that I’m not arguing that EVERYONE who is poor or is struggling has made bad decisions. I’m only talking in the context of those who are in that position because of their decisions, which I would argue is a very large percentage.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 18:39:59

What about the children? (seriously)

“I’m only talking in the context of those who are in that position because of their decisions”

How do we determine that?

“What percentage never eat out, don’t have any consumer electronics, live in an efficiency apartment, don’t have kids, take on as much work as they can find, only buy stuff when it’s on sale (when possible), etc?”

I think a lot more than you’ve been led to believe on your Kochtopus websites that constantly repeat malarkey about ‘I was behind some you-know-what who was talking on his smart phone and buying…’

I’m not saying they own no electronics, but you guys have talked yourselves into believing something that isn’t there: people living large on food stamps. Those that are are perpetuating fraud, and I agree they should be prosecuted. The majority are not.

And what percentage of your taxes do you think goes to pay for food for people?

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 22:56:39

I think a lot more than you’ve been led to believe on your Kochtopus websites that constantly repeat malarkey about ‘I was behind some you-know-what who was talking on his smart phone and buying…’

back to the ignore list you go….silly me…

 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2011-08-08 16:42:50

If the poor can’t get money they need to pay on their debt, then they simply do not pay it back. The poeple that loaned it eat the loss. If the people that have the money won’t spend it, then the poor can not pay back their debts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 18:23:58

then the poor can not pay back their debts.

Fine with me. But then they shouldn’t be able to borrow any more money, and simply will have to live with wherever that leaves them.

In the future, perhaps they shouldn’t take on debt they can’t pay back.

 
 
Comment by SaladSD
2011-08-08 21:08:04

You’re assuming all rich people “earned” it. Lots of trust funders, in addition to drug money and corruption. I’m very impressed when I meet a rich person that actually earned it without mommy & daddy paying their way ala the Donald.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 22:59:02

You’re assuming all rich people “earned” it

Actually I’m not. Just because their ancestors earned it doesn’t make it right to take it away.

Obviously I’m not going to support someone who unjustly or illegally acquired their wealth. I’m simply saying it’s not fair to take from anyone - rich or middle class or poor - to bail out someone from their bad decisions. That’s theft, unjust, and indefensible IMO.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:42:04

So when they launch the QE-3 how large should she be? $3 to $5 trillion?

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 12:56:48

Probably just $1 more trillion for now. You can’t add the liquidity faster than you unwind the debt via bankruptcy. I don’t think Bernanke wants to create run-away commodity inflation… just keep oil in that $90-100 range and aggrogate prices similar under that.

Or, another way of looking at it. Government is spending $1T more than it is taking in over the next 6 month. If the Fed just buys up that, it should be enough to keep us going.

QE4 discussion just in time for xmas.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 12:58:23

Crude down near $80.00 that’s a little good news.

Comment by bink
2011-08-08 14:04:01

That’s west Texas. Brent is still above $100.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:54:37

Now $76.52. I’m thinking I will soon once again be able to afford my daily commute.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-08 13:02:02

The too big to fail banks are down big time, and Fannie Freddie are downgraded. Kind of lets you know what the private sector is relying on, eh?

Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 14:12:24

Any word on the 2 European banks that were supposed to be teetering? One Italian, one German. There was chatter of possible runs on their deposits today.

Sorry…I was out all day today.

 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 13:02:08

Wow… down 600. S&P off 6.5%. And finished right at the lows of the day. That means it was imbalanced to the downside.

Comment by palmetto
2011-08-08 13:32:42

POOF! POOF! POOF! All that “wealth” up in smoke.

Aw, dat’s beautiful.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:53:26

Would now be a good time to buy the dip, or is it better to wait until the Fed clarifies whether QE3 is on the way?

 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 13:12:56

Wish I would have bought me some of that Pandora at 26 (now at 12.5) or Zillow at 60 (now at 26) or even LinkedIn at 122 (now 75).

I guess the new tech bubble and its centerpiece Facebook are on hold for awhile.

Comment by michael
2011-08-08 13:18:09

don’t forget that gubmint pumped and dumped GM…glad i got me some of that!

Comment by darrell_in_phoenix
2011-08-08 13:59:26

oh, nice. 52 week high of 39.5 now sitting at 24.5.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 13:21:26

Wish I would have bought me some of that Pandora at 26 (now at 12.5) or Zillow at 60 (now at 26) or even LinkedIn at 122 (now 75).

I’m of the mind that LinkedIn is way overvalued, even at 75.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-08-08 17:45:52

+1, Slim.

But I suspect the market may take quite a long time to realize it.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:52:18

Zillow zucks. Their share price apparently was as overvalued as their housing valuations are.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 13:35:53

I think we are lucky to have a AA+ That is generous.

S&P executive: 1 in 3 chance of future downgrade

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Standard & Poor’s official says there is a 1 in 3 chance that the U.S. credit rating could be downgraded another notch if conditions erode over the next six to 24 months.

The credit rating agency’s managing director, John Chambers, tells ABC’s “This Week” that if the fiscal position of the U.S. deteriorates further, or if political gridlock tightens even more, a further downgrade is possible.

Chambers also said Sunday that it would take “stabilization and eventual decline” of the federal debt as a share of the economy as well as more consensus in Washington for the U.S. to win back a top rating.

S&P downgraded the U.S. rating Friday, from AAA to AA+, for the first time.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 14:12:39

$tandard & make’emPoor, one of the thee main credit-rating agencies, “True$editionist$$erialEnabler$™”

“Boycott ‘em!” (& their Fee$ible Opinionbaiter$) ;-)

S&P has no business downgrading US bond rating:
When and how America brings down its debt shouldn’t matter to Standard & Poor’s. The ratings agency wasn’t doing it’s job in 2008, when it gave Wall Street’s riskiest securities a AAA rating, and it’s not doing its job now by hurting the US economy with an unnecessary downgrade.

By Robert B. Reich / August 8, 2011 / The Christian Science Monitor.

Who gave S&P authority to tell US how to shed debt?

Pardon me for asking, but who gave Standard & Poor’s the authority to tell America how much debt it has to shed, and how?

If we pay our bills, we’re a good credit risk. If we don’t, or aren’t likely to, we’re a bad credit risk. When, how, and by how much we bring down the long-term debt – or, more accurately, the ratio of debt to GDP – is none of S&P’s business.

In other words, had Standard & Poor’s done its job over the last decade, today’s budget deficit would be far smaller and the nation’s future debt wouldn’t look so menacing.

We’d all be better off had S&P done the job it was supposed to do, then. We’ve paid a hefty price for its nonfeasance.

A pity S&P is not even doing its job now. We’ll be paying another hefty price for its malfeasance today.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-08 14:16:16

When it comes to being very wrong, the major ratings agencies have quite the track record.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 15:15:43

$tandard & make’emPoor, one of thee main credit-rating agencies, “True$editionist$$erialEnabler$™”

“Boycott ‘em!” (& their Fee$ible Opinionbaiter$ Progno$tication$) ;-)

The Wrong Conversation About Credit Ratings Agencies:
Posted by Yuval Bar-Or / Aug. 8 2011 / Forbes

This brings up an important distinction: abolishing the NRSRO designation means taking away the safe haven and barriers to entry which have served to protect a small number of firms. It does not mean abolishing ratings. Ratings are a legitimate measure for approximating credit risk. The correct approach is not to kill off ratings but rather to take away their exclusivity.

Only one panelist came prepared for the correct discussion: professor Larry White focused on what should have been the starting point of discussions three years ago: abolishing the NRSRO designation altogether.

As media and public opinion was drawn to other stories over intervening years, including national debt crises, lingering unemployment, wars, and partisan politics, we lost our hunger for necessary credit agency reforms.

Meanwhile, industry lobbyists worked behind the scenes to ensure that whatever changes came along, they did not disrupt the golden goose—the oligopolistic Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) framework which has been at the root of so many problems.

Critics also argue that removing the NRSRO designation would disrupt markets, but a simple analogy dispels such claims. Instead of removing a cancer we have patched it up with layers of band-aids (regulations). Clearly, this is not a cure. It is a superficial approach which merely delays the inevitable. Critics are suggesting that we cannot remove the cancer now because it is too deeply entrenched in the market system. This makes it all the more urgent to act decisively, because allowing a cancer to remain means only one thing: it will spread further, making it even harder to deal with later.

Fortunately, unlike advanced cancers which cannot be removed without irreparable damage to the patient, the NRSRO designation can be jettisoned, and alternatives do exist to assist in the healing and renewal process. Markets will not collapse

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:51:11

“A Standard & Poor’s official says there is a 1 in 3 chance that the U.S. credit rating could be downgraded another notch if conditions erode over the next six to 24 months.”

Could S&P’s move offshore? Because the response of U.S. leaders to the downgrade sounds rather menacing to me; perhaps they would be able to better conduct their ratings business in a neutral country like, say, Switzerland.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 15:06:55

Clipped from The 5Min. Forecast…

“I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution,” wrote Thomas Jefferson in 1798. “I would be willing to depend on that alone for the reduction of the administration of our government; I mean an additional article taking from the Federal Government the power of borrowing.”

Well, it never came about. Hamilton won the day with his argument about the national debt being a “national blessing.” Now the debt is so huge it can never be paid off, except by rendering the currency worthless.

Comment by Mike in Miami
2011-08-08 15:42:28

Well, then we should consider ourselves extraordinarily blessed.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 16:07:37

Hamilton was founder of the Bank of NY. For sure, he had only the interests of the country in mind. Well, the interest on the debt part anyway.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2011-08-08 15:12:49

I’m surprised this fat tub-of-sh!t hasn’t retired to Cuba to live the good life!

- Michael Moore to Obama: ‘Show some guts,’ arrest S&P head
The Washington Times

Liberal firebrand Michael Moore called on President Obama to respond to the U.S. credit downgrade by arresting the leaders of the credit-ratings agencies.

On his Twitter feed Monday, the Oscar-winning film director also blamed the 2008 economic collapse on Standard & Poor’s — apparently because it and other credit-ratings agencies did not downgrade mortgage-based bonds, which encouraged the housing bubble and let it spread throughout the economy.

“Pres Obama, show some guts & arrest the CEO of Standard & Poors. These criminals brought down the economy in 2008& now they will do it again,” Mr. Moore wrote.

Standard & Poor’s, one of three key debt agencies, stripped the U.S. federal government of its AAA status Friday night and reduced it to AA+ for the first time in the nation’s history.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 16:17:09

“fat tub-of-sh!t”

Hey, a new addition to wmbz’s descriptive adjectives:

“…slack jawed jackass”

“Diversity” The puke word of the decade…”

“one less puke…”

“…witch parties ass is occupying the oval orifice”

“….thousands of examples of candy assed, bed wetter, thumb sucking policies”

“that little puke…”

“that asswipe…”

“one of the top turds…”

“I hope they throw this POS out on his fat old lying ass…”

“Bunch of mouth breathing, nose picking, bed wetting, short bus riding, ugly morons…”

“He may be a spaz/retard when it comes to…”

“Boxer is one ugly POS”

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 16:54:30

These criminals brought down the economy in 2008 & now they will do it again,” Mr. Moore wrote.

You betcha!

Standard & Poor’s Seen Surrendering to Tea Party at U.S. Taxpayer Expense
Zeke Faux, On Monday August 8, 2011

‘Always Wrong’:

S&P kept an A- rating on Iceland until October 6, 2008, when the country’s government was forced to guarantee all domestic bank deposits after its currency plunged. The company reaffirmed its AAA rating for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s financial products unit on Sept. 12, 2008, three days before the bank failed. It downgraded Bear Stearns Cos. to BBB on March 14, 2008, two days before JPMorgan agreed to buy the failing securities firm.

$2 Trillion Error

S&P came under scrutiny for ratings of financial products linked to subprime mortgages after losses and writedowns by the world’s biggest financial institutions reached $2.1 trillion.

‘Last People’

“There is no reason to take Friday’s downgrade of America seriously,” Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman said in a New York Times column. “These are the last people whose judgment we should trust.”

$tandard & make’emPoor, = “True$editionist$$erialEnabler$™”

“Boycott ‘em!” (& their Fee$ible Opinionbaiter$ Progno$tication$) ;-)

Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 17:21:05

Sincere. From the Greek: without crack.

Insincere. From Wall Street: Don’t look at my other hand.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-08-08 17:23:21

Thank you WMBZ

I like your post!

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 15:55:45

“hoc tui splat!” (In Montana™)

Even Donald Trump says S&P is doing this for publicity. :-)

Ho ho, hah hah, hehehehehehe, BwaHaHaAhHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! (Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower™)

“I can just see these guys sitting in their little office on Wall Street, or wherever they are, saying, ‘We’re going to take down the United States!’” he told Fox News. “Because they want the publicity, because they want to restore their reputation. They love it.”

“Boycott ‘em!” (& their Fee$ible Opinionbaiter$ Progno$tication$)

S&P gets a tongue lashing over US downgrade:
By Kim Peterson on Mon, Aug 8, 2011 / MSN Money

“Our currency is not AAA and in recent months the performance of our government has not been AAA, but our debt is AAA,” Buffett said. His company, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), has about $48 billion in cash and cash equivalents, and at least $40 billion of that is in U.S. Treasury bills. Buffett said he’s still going to hold those.

“If anything, it may change my opinion on S&P,” he said. Keep in mind that Berkshire is one of the biggest shareholders in Moody’s, one of S&P’s main rivals. (Moody’s, by the way, affirmed its AAA rating for the U.S. Monday.)

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

The Blood Bath on Wall Street Is the Blood of Main Street:
Submitted by Robert Oak on Mon, 08/08/2011 / Economic Populist

More and more S&P is being accused of playing politics, buying into Tea Party insanity, instead of objective analysis:

At a point with such a jobs crisis ongoing for 43 months, this could indeed be the tipping point. Consumer spending is already D.O.A. and real income, adjusted for inflation, has declined 13.7% from 2007

Like all great economies, when one moves to financialization, complete with bail outs and lobbyists, instead of a production economy and then gets a series of crazies out to destroy social safety nets and the U.S. middle class along with it, these are the results.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 16:30:01

Geez, joining together & getting involved in finding solutions for their own kind region, how novel. ;-)

Arab nations step up pressure on Syrian regime:

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Bahrain withdraw their ambassadors as more nations seek to pressure President Bashar Assad to end the assault on the pro-democracy movement.
By Borzou Daragahi, Los Angeles Times / August 9, 2011

Over the weekend, the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council, a body of six wealthy Arabian peninsula kingdoms, also denounced the violence. And on Monday, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Bahrain withdrew their ambassadors.

In addition, Turkey, once a steadfast ally, is preparing to take a harder approach. Turkish reports said Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu would arrive in the Syrian capital, Damascus, on Tuesday to deliver an ultimatum.

The two nations “will sit down and talk for one last time,” the Turkish daily Hurriyet quoted an unidentified Foreign Ministry official as saying. “The talks will show whether the ties will be cut loose or not, or if a new [Turkish] policy is to be outlined on Syria. That’s the last meeting.”

“Members of the security forces may themselves be concerned that the violence is pointless and exposes the whole Alawite community to the wrath of the population,” which is overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim, Malley said.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-08-08 17:16:42

Navy Seals slaughtered in Afganistan.

Obama gets busy fundraising.

for the families of the fallen soldiers?

Sometimes the juxtaposition of headlines is sickening.

Comment by Muggy
2011-08-08 17:41:11

“Sometimes the juxtaposition of headlines is sickening.”

Funny the way it is…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwi4KpI_MgE

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 17:54:47

tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
(Yield not to misfortunes, but advance all the more boldly against them)

victis honor
(Honor to the vanquished)

Really, eyes was delighted with this juxtaposition on May 2 2011 / The Rash Limpbaughs Show:

Rash Limpbaughs: “Ladies and gentlemen, we need to open the program today by congratulating President Obama.”

“No one else thought of that. Not a single intelligence advisor, not a single national security advisor, not a single military advisor came up with the idea of using SEAL Team 6 or any of the Special Forces.”

Our military wanted to go in there and just scorch the earth, leaving no evidence of anything after the mission. But President Obama single-handedly understood what was at stake here. He alone understood the need to get DNA to prove the death. Obama alone understood the aftermath, alone understood that there would be doubting Thomases if the place was just obliterated and no evidence was to be found. According to news reports, not one member of the military, not General Petraeus, nobody in the intel community, nobody had the slightest idea of going in there and using Special Forces. It was President Obama, single-handedly and alone, who came up with the strategy that brought about the effective assassination of Osama Bin Laden.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2011-08-08 17:26:35

I can’t believe it took me this long to discover box wine.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-08-08 18:43:59

Careful- you never know how much you’ve drunk until the box that was going to last a week lasts two hazy days.

 
 
Comment by liz pendens
Comment by Muggy
2011-08-08 17:52:32

Man, the internet can be so stupid, but I love that.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 19:23:38

As for himself, Mr. Robison, who grew up in Lake Elsinore, Calif., said that as Wall Street’s problems spilled over onto Main Street - and into his own life - he had stopped finding the humor in market collapses.

His parents’ home was foreclosed upon last year. The public school where his mother teaches has been gutted by budget cuts. And while he is freelancing for a number of publications, including the popular Web site The Morning News, Mr. Robison says he cannot find steady work in Madison.

“I don’t think it’s funny anymore,” he said. “Now it’s kind of sad because I just want the economy to recover.”

Hey Mikey, a new recruit for The 20th Maine Regiment fixed bayonet$ for a counter attack! / Vote! ;-)

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:38:09

“Lake Elsinore, Calif.”

This is near San Diego. I think John Albert Gardiner III lived there before he decided to rape and kill young girls closer in to San Diego proper.

“…he had stopped finding the humor in market collapses.”

Aside from savoring the collapse of Eddie’s portfolio, I find market collapses about as humorous as a tsunami, as in, not at all. The next leg of collapse will obviously be a worsening labor market, with higher unemployment, foreclosures, bankruptcies, etc.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Comment by rms
2011-08-08 21:55:01

“Aside from savoring the collapse of Eddie’s portfolio…”

Don’t tell me Eddie is living in your head, rent free?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:34:47

“Brokers with Hands on their Faces”

Is it 1929 again? Because these guys are acting as I imagine stock traders acted during the Great Crash. The looks of disbelief on their faces say it all.

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-08-08 17:43:04

I wonder how Eddie enjoyed watching his portfolio today?

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:28:06

Hardy har har!!! Better luck in your next lifetime, Eddie!

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-08 20:20:57

Poor TardBoi Eddie.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:34:21

“TardBoi Eddie”

Bawn’ and bred in a briar patch!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by drumminj
2011-08-08 23:00:43

Better luck in your next lifetime, Eddie!

And your true colors show. You wish ill upon someone you’ve never met - great character there PB. :: shakes head ::

And you assume Eddie is a perma-bull and currently long, when all he did was argue for a run up in the market.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-09 04:23:41

Speaking of wobblers, weavers and tardboi’s….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:25:18

QE3 time?

Market Pulse Archives

Aug. 8, 2011, 2:53 p.m. EDT
Fed more likely to act Tuesday, economist
By Greg Robb

Stories You Might Like
Goldman Sachs cuts S&P 500 target to 1,400
Paul B. Farrell: 2011-2020: Decade of U.S.…
U.S. stocks open sharply lower on downgrade
Bank of America’s swoon hits financials

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Michael Moran, chief economist at Daiwa Securities America, said he was more confident in his prediction that the Federal Reserve would act Tuesday to try to counter the negative psychology in financial markets. Moran said the Fed would likely decide to lengthen the maturities of its balance sheet at its policy meeting to put downward pressure on long-term interest rates. The message would be that the Fed is “on the job,” Moran said. Market psychology has been damaged by the discord in Congress and the downgrade of the U.S. top-tier AAA credit rating, he said.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:31:49

According to Josh Rogin, the Congressional debt ceiling battle was merely the warmup act in their upcoming effort to sink the U.S. economy.

Enjoy life in economic hell, America, courtesy of your Congress!

Aug. 8, 2011, 1:44 p.m. EDT
2011-20: Decade of U.S. economic hell
Commentary: More bad news for ‘America’s Worst Decade’
By Paul B. Farrell, MarketWatch

SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. (MarketWatch) — Next decade? Toxic politics promises to make economic matters much worse than even today.

“The U.S. economy appears to be coming apart at the seams,” warned Columbia Prof. Robert Lieberman earlier this year in Foreign Affairs.

Now, over at Foreign Policy magazine, Josh Rogin warns: “This Fight Ain’t Over: Think the debt ceiling gridlock was ugly? Congress is just getting warmed up. Here are eight more foreign-policy battles right around the corner,” when they get back to sinking the economic recovery even deeper this fall.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 19:58:54

It seems pretty obvious the Fed will soon announce QE3; are they deliberately letting markets crash to politically justify it?

They are already floating the plan on NPR; and they misspelled ‘worthless.’

U.S. Debt Downgraded
The Fed steps up
By John Dimsdale Marketplace, Monday, August 8, 2011

Now that partisan politics has rendered the government unable to function, only one player in Washington has the power to affect the economy: the Federal Reserve

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies during a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee July 13, 2011 on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Kai Ryssdal: A reasonable question right about here might be: So, if our political system can’t run our economy anymore, who can?

Our Washington bureau chief John Dimsdale has that part of the story.

John Dimsdale: Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke only has two tools left in his belt, but he’s been using both a lot lately. He’s hammered interest rates down to zero, and ratcheted up the printing presses several times. Some say it’s time to crank ‘em up again and print more money.

Todd Zwicki: The theory is that what we already owe on the debt would become easier to pay back because each dollar would be worth less.

You heard right. George Mason University professor Todd Zwicki says the Fed may be considering a little inflation. That way, the government could re-pay the expensive dollars it borrowed with cheaper ones. It would help underwater homebuyers, too.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 20:33:04

“Todd Zwicki: The theory is that what we already owe on the debt would become easier to pay back because each dollar would be worth less.”

Well d’oh! Thanks a lot, you maroon!!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 21:07:28

After peaking north of 39K circa 1989, the Nikkei is still dropping 22 years later:

Nikkei falls over 4 percent, biggest loss since quake
By Ayai Tomisawa
TOKYO | Mon Aug 8, 2011 10:46pm EDT

(Reuters) - The Nikkei average tumbled more than 4 percent in heavy volume Tuesday, posting the biggest one-day fall since the March earthquake as investors fled the stock market in the wake of a plunge on Wall Street and a downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt.

The mood was exacerbated by news that China’s consumer price inflation rose to 6.5 percent in July from June’s 6.4 percent, topping market forecasts for 6.3 percent and fuelling fears of more tightening in the world’s second-largest economy.

Despite relatively cheap valuations, the Tokyo market could not avoid the repercussions of the U.S. downgrade, which prompted investors to unload risky assets.

Analysts said many investors initially underestimated the potential market impact of Standard & Poor’s downgrade of U.S. debt, with the Nikkei posting a less severe slide on Monday, but it now looks vulnerable with new sell orders coming in and the potential for fund redemptions and margin calls.

“Foreign investors wasted little time to unload Japanese stocks, and there may be more selling in the coming days,” said Makoto Nagahori, head of equities at Instinet, adding that investors may hedge against potential losses ahead of the Nikkei options settlement on Friday.

The benchmark Nikkei .225 was down 4.4 percent at 8,694.31 by the midday break after falling as low as 8,656.79, just above an intraday low marked on March 17 of 8,639.56.

Analysts said if the Nikkei drops below that mark the next support is seen at 8,227.63, an intraday low posted on March 15.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 21:42:14

Would now be a good time to buy the Nikkei dip, or will that geriatric overhang weigh on the Japanese economy for several more decades, sinking share prices indefinitely?

Dips buyers want to know.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 21:58:44

Robust, bust. Think like a Bayesian, Mark!

Stock market’s drop is more unique than you think
August 8, 2011, 4:12 PM

The stock market’s drop over the last couple of weeks may indeed be a 1-in-20 event, as it was reported this morning that Dan Greenhaus, chief global strategist at BTIG, had said. But in fact, what’s happened over the last two weeks is even more unique than that.

That’s because double counting is involved in coming up with those other 20 events. It turns out that they actually occurred in three clusters: The 1987 Crash and immediate aftermath, the Credit Crunch in October and November 2008, and the last couple of days prior to the bear market’s bottom in March 2009.

An appreciation of this uniqueness provides only limited solace, however. A sample of just three events is not big enough to support robust statistical conclusions, of course.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 22:04:28

How can anyone be dumb enough to doubt the Fed will enact QE3. Isn’t it completely obvious? The big-bad selloff merely serves to set the stage.

Downgrade Ignites a Global Selloff
Dow’s 634.76-Point Plunge Is Worst Since ‘08 as Worries Rise About U.S. Economy; Asian Markets Drop at Open
By E.S. BROWNING

The downgrade of the U.S.’s credit rating sparked a global selloff on Monday, pushing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to its sharpest one-day decline since the financial crisis in 2008.

In scenes reminiscent of three years ago, selling accelerated as the day went on, and investors were forced to sell to meet margin calls from lenders demanding more collateral. The Dow ended the day down 634.76 points, or 5.5%, at 10809.85, its lowest close since last October. Trading volume of stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange hit the fourth-highest level in history.

In Asia Tuesday morning, investors continued the global selloff with huge stock market losses and a rapid unwinding of currency and commodity bets. South Korea’s Kospi Composite plunged 7.6% in morning trading, leaving it more than 20% lower since Aug. 1. Japan’s Nikkei Stock Average traded more than 4% lower, and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng was down 7% and below the 20000 level for the first time since July 2010. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 lost nearly 3%, putting the market there into bear territory, down more than 20% from its April 11 high.

Monday’s Dow decline was its biggest percentage drop since December 2008 and its sixth-largest point decline ever. Other major stock indexes also fell heavily. Traders also dumped corporate bonds and industrial commodities.

Investors fled to the traditional refuges: gold, currencies of safe-seeming countries such as Switzerland, and, ironically, the very securities that Standard & Poor’s downgraded on Friday, U.S. Treasury bonds. For most investors, Treasurys seemed a lot safer than stocks.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council, a group of U.S. regulators led by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, held an emergency conference call Monday afternoon to discuss the financial-market volatility, a person familiar with the call said.

“There’s probably as much uncertainty as we’ve seen since 2008,” said Eric Pellicciaro of asset manager BlackRock’s Fundamental Fixed Income division, which has $612.5 billion in assets under management. “There’s a general feeling that policy options are few and far between. There’s a feeling that fiscal austerity is coming at the worst possible time.”

While there are no indications that the Federal Reserve intends to launch a new bond-buying program to support financial markets, investors are already speculating that the Fed may act in some way. Central-bank officials are set to meet Tuesday to discuss monetary policy.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-08-08 22:04:40

Now this doesn’t leave one very warm or fuzzy:

Fed’s Sheets Quits as Bernanke’s Chief International Adviser

“The Federal Reserve said D. Nathan Sheets quit as the central bank’s chief international economic adviser after almost four years in the position and a day before policy makers meet……

Sheets is using annual-leave days between now and his official departure date of Sept. 9 and won’t attend tomorrow’s FOMC meeting, said David Skidmore, a Fed spokesman.

The departure means all three of Bernanke’s top staff advisers have left their positions or announced their departures in the last 13 months. Brian Madigan, former director of the Division of Monetary Affairs, retired last year, while the Fed said in May that David Stockton, director of the Division of Research and Statistics, is retiring Sept. 30. ”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-08/fed-s-d-nathan-sheets-resigns-as-bernanke-s-chief-international-adviser.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 22:06:28

Why all the fear over banks? Didn’t investors get the 2008 memo that Megabank, Inc is too-big-to-fail?

BUSINESS
AUGUST 9, 2011, 12:57 A.M. ET

Fear Returns for U.S. Banks
BY DAN FITZPATRICK

Fears about the health of the U.S. banking system are back in a big way.

Bank stocks plunged 11% Monday in their biggest one-day drop since April 2009, as investors questioned how well giant financial firms will weather a slowing economy and tumultuous markets after an unprecedented downgrade of U.S. debt.

Hardest hit was Bank of America Corp., which saw its stock tumble 20% and the cost of insuring its bonds against default surge 50%.

Comment by SDGreg
2011-08-09 02:05:05

Bank stocks plunged 11% Monday in their biggest one-day drop since April 2009, as investors questioned how well giant financial firms will weather a slowing economy and tumultuous markets after an unprecedented downgrade of U.S. debt.

How much was the lawsuit by AIG against BofA a factor in the BofA decline versus the other factors?

 
 
Comment by rms
2011-08-08 22:11:56

The fed now owns more shares than any hedge fund these days since their buying binge following the late 2008 rout, so if anyone got hurt today it was Bernanke. How about Mad Money’s Jim Cramer? Did he turn inside out today, a la The Thing?

John Carpenter’s The Thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TevQS4qgE_Q

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 22:14:26

I would like to take the opportunity to heartily congratulate the Tea Party for their highly-successful effort to crash the economy over their debt ceiling negotiations. So far, they are succeeding at a level which I am sure few investors could have imagined.

Just wait until the labor market endures the next leg down; they will try their hardest to blame it on Obama, but I predict the American voter will rightfully cast blame on Republicans.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-08 22:43:29

“TrueReducetheDeficitNow! Today!!™” + “TrueGridLok$editionist’s™” wee-peeParty tea toadlers = (as one HBB poster said today):

Looks like the treaded on themselves & their families ;-)

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

Since July 22, when Repubicans abandoned debt negotiations with the White House for the third time that month, the index has lost $2.9 trillion in value.

The Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index, the broadest index of U.S. stocks, lost 891.93 points, or just over 7%, Monday. This represents a paper loss for the day of approximately $1.0 trillion.

By Steve Hargreaves August 8, 2011 / CNN Money

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-08 22:23:58

DJIA 52-week high = 12,876.00

Current level = 10,809.85

Looking on the bright side, the market isn’t even off by 20% yet — still a ways to go before entering bear market territory:

((12,876.00-10,809.85)/12,876.00)*100 = 16% down so far.

‘Tis a mere flesh wound!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post