August 12, 2011

It’s Not Too Late To Do Better

It’s Friday desk clearing time for this blogger. “Foreclosure activity in Manatee County skyrocketed by more than 103 percent from June to July. The increased foreclosure activity also may be a sign, according to another local attorney, that banks are returning to a less sympathetic — and less realistic — means of handling the legions of distressed homeowners. ‘We’re just not seeing the banks changing their mindsets,’ said Dawn Bates-Buchanan, an attorney who represents homeowners facing foreclosure. ‘The mindset is still, ‘Let’s push these through as fast as we can.’ Houses are still just sitting empty.’”

“Overall, the pick-up in foreclosure activity signals that the cycle set in motion at the start of the recession is proceeding and not stuck indefinitely, said real estate attorney Bob Hoonhout. ‘Some people take the position that if we’re ever to get back to the norm, these foreclosures have to be cleared up in one way or another,’ he said. ‘In that sense, I wouldn’t use the adjective ‘good.’ But this is a sign that the system is beginning to move a little cleaner and a little faster.’”

“Foreclosures in the Northstate are on the rise. Curt Largent, owner of Sheldon Largent Realty in Redding says there are currently almost 700 properties in default in Shasta County. That means homeowners have missed two months of mortgage payments. And there are almost 300 homes that have received a notice of sale, which usually leads to foreclosure.”

“Largent says more and more people are making a strategic choice to walk away from their homes, rather than it being a financial hardship. ‘The only reason why it hasn’t gotten worse faster is because they [the banks] are regulating the flow of foreclosures coming to market,’ says Largent. ‘If they were to dump everything that’s out there it would absolutely devastate the market.’”

“Foreclosure activity in the Bay State keeps rising. ‘Right now Springfield is in very serious danger. The whole neighborhoods, we have so many abandoned houses, people are getting ready to lose their houses. And then of course now we have the tornados, so Springfield, as far as its homes, we are just in a lot of danger right now,’ said Deborah Broaden, director of the Western MA Foreclosure Center.”

“The HUD agency reports that just in Hampden County there are more than 280 foreclosed properties. And that’s not including the glut of houses where foreclosure petitions have been stalled by big banks. ‘They are a little bit slower in filing the petitions. But the crisis is still here they are just tearing it, so it looks like, you hear people saying ‘oh the foreclosure numbers have gone down’ they really haven’t,’ said Broaden.”

“The Gem State’s foreclosure numbers are decreasing but a local expert warns this might not be a sign we are recovering. Tim Bundgard, a local real estate expert and CEO of Pioneer Title Company, says the decline is because of a foreclosure processing slowdown by the banks. Bundgard says 35 percent is misleading. While it may sound good, it is not a sign that the housing crisis is healing but really just a postponement.”

“In the Treasure Valley, the slowing of foreclosures has helped people trying to sell their homes. ‘If you had a big flood of foreclosures it would dampen the price of the existing market for housing. What we’ve seen is that actually a reprieve on that because it has allowed it to gain some feet underneath it. So, that has actually been a good thing for us,’ said Bundgard.”

“As a senior information specialist working for the Department of Health and Human Services, Christina Bradshaw has what a housing official called a ‘good job.’ Yet, Bradshaw said after a divorce she faced the choice of living in a community she could afford or one that was a good environment for her three kids. In the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, which includes the suburbs, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s calculations show renters in many nearby counties also need to make about $28 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment.”

“‘I was juggling,’ she said. ‘One month I could pay the rent on time, and one month I could pay the utilities on time.’”

“If Bradshaw, with her good job, was having trouble, imagine what faces Maryland’s lowest-paid workers. Affordability is based on the assumption, used by most federal housing programs, that no more than 30 percent of income should be spent on shelter. With housing costs increasing faster than wages for many workers in Maryland, more are seeking assistance, including some unexpected applicants, like Bradshaw.”

“A row of new townhomes is setting the stage to create a vibrant community in the heart of Downtown Covina. Having already sold five homes, Olson Communities president Bill Holford said young professionals and first-time buyers who are looking for something new, fresh and innovative have been attracted to the affordable home prices, which start in the mid $300,000s. ‘For the first-time buyer, rather than buying a resale home or foreclosure home, you have a new townhome with a 10-year warranty,’ Holford said.”

“If nationwide stats are any prediction, said Hank Hogue, VP with Crye-Leike Realtors Inc. and manager of the Cordova office, the foreclosure market doesn’t appear to be losing steam anytime soon. ‘I have read several articles through RISmedia, Inman News and Realtor.org that indicate there are 1 million homes nationwide that have not been processed for foreclosure yet,’ he said. ‘These homes should hit the market in 2012 and 2013. At present sales levels, it will be months before these properties are absorbed by the market.’”

“‘We have spent an inordinate amount of time trying to educate people that your market is local,’ said Sue Stinson Turner, broker and sales manager with Crye-Leike’s Forest Hill-Irene office. ‘For example, we had 11 ZIP codes that had higher sales prices in the first six months of 2011 versus 2010. Well, that’s good news. And are there ZIP codes that had less, yes. Let’s get the good news out instead of CNN saying, ‘Oh, the whole world’s falling down.’ What does the market mean to you here, not in Nevada or California.’”

“Local Realtors are hoping for a buying frenzy in light of the recent U.S. credit rating cut by Standard & Poor’s. In Lee County, the median home price has increased 30 percent since Jan. 1. ‘Our fire is not out,’ said Denny Grimes, a Realtor with Denny Grimes and Co. at Royal Shell Real Estate in Fort Myers. ‘We’re not ready to cook s’mores yet. But our fire is still building. We need ‘s’more’ good news.’”

“Fear and uncertainty over the wildly fluctuating stock market are having a positive affect on the housing market. But falling home prices may hurt people wanting to refinance or get a second mortgage. Gloria Morris, mortgage lending manager at Tennessee Valley Federal Credit Union, said ’sometimes the values are not coming in quite as high as they might expect but as long as they intend to live in their home, they’re not planning to sell it and if it’s enough to do, or the equity is enough of what they want to do then they should be fine with it and not worry about the value of their homes going down.’”

“Morris said the housing market is flooded with foreclosures and properties that aren’t selling so don’t expect home values to rise much in the next few years.”

“It’s hard to believe that it’s been 46 years since August 11, 1965, the day the Watts uprising began. I’ll never forget the fear that I felt watching the chaos unfold. I was shocked but not surprised: you could feel the anger and frustration building up during that hot summer. Over the following two years there were a number of additional riots in Chicago, Newark, Detroit and elsewhere. Today in Watts and across California people are feeling that familiar angry bubbling stirring up as the gap between rich and poor grows ever wider.”

“I knew something was wrong a decade ago when my mailbox began to get filled on a daily basis with offers that seemed too good to be true. The pamphlets were from realtors, brokers and lenders that were selling predatory loans. These subprime loans were designed to be more expensive products for high risk borrowers, but turned out to be a chance for loan sharks to make a buck by pushing them on my elderly and minority neighbors, whether they needed them or not. One Wells Fargo loan officer recently testified publicly to the widespread practice of steering subprime loans, cynically referred to as ‘ghetto loans,’ to borrowers with good credit.[1]”

“A plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to subsidize investors who buy foreclosures is among foreclosure-reduction strategies that have been considered by the Obama administration, according to a former White House economist. Also last week, a bill was introduced in Congress that would permit Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and banks to rent out foreclosed houses for up to five years.”

“Economist Chris Thornberg says he does not believe involvement by the federal government in the single-family home rental market will be any more successful than other federal interventions such as loan modification programs and homebuyer tax credits. ‘Just stop already,’ said Thornberg. ‘It is ridiculous. Everything they have done … has been pointless. The only thing that is going to eliminate the overhang (of foreclosures) is time.’”

“Why is everyone still referring to the recent financial crisis as the ‘Great Recession’? The term, after all, is predicated on a dangerous misdiagnosis of the problems that confront the United States and other countries, leading to bad forecasts and bad policy.”

“Too many policymakers have relied on the belief that, at the end of the day, this is just a deep recession that can be subdued by a generous helping of conventional policy tools, whether fiscal policy or massive bailouts. But the real problem is that the global economy is badly overleveraged, and there is no quick escape without a scheme to transfer wealth from creditors to debtors, either through defaults, financial repression or inflation.”

“Acknowledging that we have been using the wrong framework is the first step toward finding a solution. It is too late to undo the bad forecasts and mistaken policies that have marked the aftermath of the financial crisis, but it is not too late to do better.”




RSS feed

26 Comments »

Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-12 09:55:43

The Rogoff article was one of a spate in favor of inflating away the debt I read recently. I’ll give him credit because he and Reinhardt are the ones who got things right.

I wouldn’t necessarily agree that the FED cannot create inflation. Imagine this. The federal government issues 0% interest, zero coupon, 100-year bonds. Who would buy such things? The FED.

And the federal government uses the money to provide $100,000 to every American. If you are in debt, the money goes first to pay it off. If you are not, you get the cash.

Voila — debt vaporizes, and so does the value of savings, as inflation soars.

“The real problem is that the global economy is badly overleveraged, and there is no quick escape without a scheme to transfer wealth from creditors to debtors, either through defaults, financial repression or inflation.”

The government doesn’t need a scheme to have the transfer happen via defaults. All it has to do is let the market make it happen by itself. Should it?

Comment by polly
2011-08-12 11:26:37

That isn’t the Fed creating inflation. That is the Fed enabling the federal government to create inflation. Congressional action is needed, and you ain’t going to get that in the current atmosphere.

And if you are trying to make already incurred private debts more affordable, the only useful inflation is the type that increases wages. I still don’t see how you get that while China artificially surpresses the value of the yuan.

Government obligations (federal, state and local) often are in forms that go up with or even faster than inflation (paying for health services, retirement benefits, salaries, contractors, etc.) so inflation doesn’t help much with those.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-12 17:36:00

“…either through defaults, financial repression or inflation.”

I vote through defaults, without bailouts, as then lenders who made foolish loans are drummed out of the system.

I don’t claim to know what financial repression is, except that it sounds unpleasant. And inflation is too much like theft for my taste — why should the Fed be allowed to siphon away the value of fixed-income retirees’ future earning streams to make whole lenders whose foolish lending practices should result in their going out of business?

Comment by GH
2011-08-12 21:23:03

You DO realize who the primary creditors are right?

1. Social Security recipients
2. Pension recipients
3. Banks
4. Minicipalities, States, The Rich, The Poor
5 but not last - Wall Street

EVERYONE gets defaulted on!

As it stands general policy appears to be to allow default and then fund the creditor quietly in the background with government bailout money. This is not working very well as it has the net effect of nationalizing debt

It is my firm belief that if we continue on our present course we will see the complete destruction of the US dollar and a period - perhaps an extended one of world war, anarchy and destruction on a level no one on this planet has seen since? OK new experience for all of us.

The bottom line of this world is no money in ATM’s, closed banks which tell you to call the FDIC, which in turn is broke …

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-12 23:36:30

“OK new experience for all of us.”

We have many troops who have served multiple tours of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan who may beg to differ.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Lily
2011-08-12 11:37:10

Interesting post and I appreciate @ET’s opinions. This is quite a sticky situation we seem to be in and, unfortunately, I do not realistically see this fixing itself; but I do hope that the government chooses not to allow banks to rent out foreclosures.

Comment by WT Economist
2011-08-12 12:12:06

Looks like another Republican wedge issue.

“Obama is using federal bailout properties to get Black gang members out of the cities and into the suburbs!”

Rather than be tarred with that, the should just let the free market the Republicans are allegedly in favor of do the job for them!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-12 12:30:15

“But the real problem is that the global economy is badly overleveraged, and there is no quick escape without a scheme to transfer wealth from creditors to debtors, either through defaults, financial repression or inflation.”

“Acknowledging that we have been using the wrong framework is the first step toward finding a solution. It is too late to undo the bad forecasts and mistaken policies that have marked the aftermath of the financial crisis, but it is not too late to do better.”

DING DING DING! WE HAVE A WINNER, FOLKS!!!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-12 12:59:49

From the original post:

“I knew something was wrong a decade ago when my mailbox began to get filled on a daily basis with offers that seemed too good to be true. The pamphlets were from realtors, brokers and lenders that were selling predatory loans. These subprime loans were designed to be more expensive products for high risk borrowers, but turned out to be a chance for loan sharks to make a buck by pushing them on my elderly and minority neighbors, whether they needed them or not. One Wells Fargo loan officer recently testified publicly to the widespread practice of steering subprime loans, cynically referred to as ‘ghetto loans,’ to borrowers with good credit.[1]”

To which I say:

I strongly suspect that one of my now-former neighbors signed for one of these loans. My first worry-sign was when his partner said that their house was worth well north of $200k. That was back in 2005 and Tucson’s housing bubble was still raging.

I kept my mouth shut, because I really didn’t think their place was worth that much. I mean, it’s a nice enough house and they did a lot to spruce up the interior and exterior, but still. I figured that the guys were so happy about their house’s new value that they were taking a cash-out refi.

Well, the place went into foreclosure and our neighborhood lost a truly delightful man. Bob was a Vietnam vet and had some physical and mental issues due to Agent Orange exposure. Not the sort who should have been signing papers to refinance the house without getting some sort of help.

His partner, Pete, still lives around here, and what a broken man he has become. Guy used to like to sit out in the front yard and chat with Bob and whoever passed by. That’s how I met them.

These days, it appears that Pete is trying to drink himself to death.

 
Comment by palmetto
2011-08-12 13:46:27

Did anyone catch the item about the Federal Appeals Court striking down the individual mandate in Obama’s healthcare legislation on the grounds of unconstitutionality? Praise Jeebus.

That sucker’s headed all the way to the Supreme Court, I’ll bet.

And if I’m Obama, I’m wondering how to lift the dang curse.

“Who the gods would destroy, they first make proud.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-12 14:56:25

And if I’m Obama, I’m wondering how to lift the dang curse.

C’mon, Barack, just say “public option.”

The insurance industry will threaten to wash your mouth out with soap, but that’s okay. Being nasty is what health insurers do.

Put a public option in that thing, and you’ll cruise to re-election.

Comment by palmetto
2011-08-12 15:13:15

“Put a public option in that thing, and you’ll cruise to re-election.”

How would that come about? What exactly would have to occur? Do they amend the legislation, or what?

IMO, the Supremes will likely affirm the appeals court decision. There’s precedent, and probably there will be some sighs of relief on both sides of the aisle, considering the debt and all that.

 
Comment by GH
2011-08-12 21:29:34

Republican controlled congress will never allow this to happen. Besides UK has a “public option” of sorts and health care there suffers. Can you say health rationing.

I like Professor Bears suggestion health insurance be only for catastrophic.

The health industry would go ballistic at the prospect of having to charge fees ordinary folks could afford…

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-12 23:38:18

“The health industry would go ballistic…”

Politicians might also get quite upset, if their flow of campaign contributions from the health insurance industry was squeezed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SdNewbie
2011-08-12 14:44:25

So, it’s been several months since I’ve posted . . . but I couldn’t resist. There are times when political motivations can be obscured, and the individual mandate is one of them.

I don’t believe the intent was EVER to keep that in the bill. I think it was put in the bill to get it past the health insurance lobby with the expectation it would eventually be removed.

The important note here is the rest of the health care legislation remains in tact.

Mission accomplished . . . .

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-12 14:58:46

The important note here is the rest of the health care legislation remains in tact.

Mission accomplished . . . .

I won’t consider this mission to be accomplished until the health insurance industry is wearing cement shoes.

Comment by palmetto
2011-08-12 15:10:01

Amen, sistah!

Comment by BKKObserver
2011-08-12 17:30:58

Hallelujah!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ncinerate
2011-08-17 08:27:16

Since the health care legislation was passed:

My deductible has doubled and copay/percentages have raised significantly in order to keep my plan at the same monthly rate I had budgeted in for it (I’m finishing up a teaching degree and we are living on a tight 1-income budget off my wife’s teaching contract).

I’ll be the first person to tell you I cheered on health care reform when it was being pushed through. Better consumer protections, lower prices, health care available for every american despite preexisting conditions? Sign me up! Unfortunately, the reality of the situation seems to be FAR removed from the pixie dust I was being promised.

Tell me again how exactly this has benefited me? Maybe I’m missing the silver lining while staring down a new increased deductible/copay percentage that GUARANTEES credit default if I, or my son, is significantly sick or injured. Am I the only one seeing this?

 
 
Comment by traderjack
2011-08-12 17:34:02

Come on, folks,no has forced anyone to buy Health Insurance, have they?

They force you to buy Car Insurance, and, if you home has a loan on it, Property Insurance!

But, no one forces you to buy Health Insurance.

I recommend that no one buy Health Insurance at all. If you get sick pay the doctor bills with cash or credit card, and save the monthly payments.

I can believe that people are willing to by $5,000 to $10,000 a year on the chance that they might get sick.

How do you think your grandparents did it?

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-12 17:39:45

“I recommend that no one buy Health Insurance at all. If you get sick pay the doctor bills with cash or credit card, and save the monthly payments.”

Lovely plan until someone gets truly sick, can’t work, can’t pay big medical bills, and goes broke.

The right plan is to design legitimate insurance, with high deductibles to keep costs down and higher prices for those who take unnecessary health risks (e.g. smokers). This insures those who are truly ill with coverage that will protect them when they are not in a position to work or cover expensive treatment, while keeping premiums low by excluding routine medical treatment from the coverage.

Comment by GH
2011-08-12 21:26:34

That is 100% right. Health insurance needs to work like other kinds of insurance. Not for day to day stuff, but there if you need it after an accident of major illness etc.

Changing health care from managed care to catastrophic coverage would solve a great many problems.

Comment by Professor Bear
2011-08-12 23:07:54

While we are on the subject of insurance, here is a little tip:

OASDI = Old Age, Survivor’s and Disability INSURANCE.

Social Security was not designed to be a taxpayer-funded giveaway of two decades’ worth of post-65 spending money for people with plenty of other retirement assets. It is high time to return Social Security to its intended purpose, which was to provide insurance against a lack of adequate income in old age due to problems beyond the control of the insured, rather than a wealth transfer from working adults to old folks who don’t need the money.

Is this really that hard to figure out? I think not…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by lint
2011-08-13 08:13:28

“Lovely plan until someone gets truly sick, can’t work, can’t pay big medical bills, and goes broke.”

Fear motivates yet has little to do with real outcomes.

I was pretty sick and refuse to have medical insurance (I will not participate in scams including popular ones like medical insurance)

My week stay in the short staffed American hospital would have been fatal without the wife reminding the few staff available to bring me anti-biotics. Lots of fully insured people at this hospital getting the exact same treatment. I bet lots of insured die from neglect in Us hospitals.

Anyhow, to take care of my problem after the emergency phase, I was quoted $350,000 here in the states with the strong likelihood of contracting MRSA. So I went to India to have the problem solved at $12,000 with the benefit of a well staffed and MRSA free hospital.

Insurance is for suckers and folks that do not think about their health much.

I

 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-08-13 05:39:09

You have a point there unless something catastrophic occurs. While you are in your 20s and 30s, instead of paying $150 or more per month for health insurance you’d save that amount in Series I Savings bonds and EE bonds. Then in your 40s you better start buying health insurance in case of something catastrophic. In my 20s and 30s the worst I had was walking pneumonia. Everything else was like sinus infections. In my 40s I had what was most likely an ulcer.

Things get worse from there. The best you can do is to live an extremely healthy lifestyle. I sometimes think I’d go as far as live in a bike-friendly community such as Davis, Ca. and give up my car - to avoid car accidents. My 90-something uncle was a regular cyclist and drove into his 90s and that was his problem. You lose some judgement and reaction time the older you get and he got into an accident. Died months later.

 
 
Comment by TraderJack
2011-08-13 22:10:17

There is always some reason why people want medical coverage, and the big reason is that they want someone else to cover their excess medical expenses.

I have suggested to our state that all emergency room service require that the patient sign a loan for the cost of the work, that loan would then be sold to the state on a discounted basis, and the patient required to pay the bill from any income tax refund, or , upon death, would be a debt for the estate.

Of course the problem is that the er’s charges tend to be phony, and , so, the loan would be the amount that would be reimbursed by Medicare as if the patient was covered by Medicare.

Of course I go no response to my suggestions. LOL

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post