A system of capitalism presumes sound money, not fiat money manipulated by a central bank. Capitalism cherishes voluntary contracts and interest rates that are determined by savings, not credit creation by a central bank.
- Ron Paul
I wonder what goes through Ben Bernanke’s mind as he sits in his gold plated boardroom in the majestic Marriner Eccles building in Washington DC and decides to impoverish grandmothers in order to further enrich Wall Street bankers. He just pledged to keep interest rates at zero percent for two more years. Ben is a supposedly book smart man. Does he have no guilt or shame for what he has wrought? How does he sleep at night knowing he has created bloody revolutions around the globe due to his inflationary zero interest policy? People are dying because he has decided that an elite group of Wall Street bankers who recklessly brought down the worldwide financial system in 2008 deserve to be kept alive and enriched at the expense of the many.
…
At one point in our wacky post 9/11 history Gaddafi was considered rehabilitated by more than a few departments of state. Most will recall Libya being elected to chair the UN Human Rights commission in early 2003.
As for Mubarak, most will recall that at least one of our more prolific “allies” in the region considers an Egypt without him a significant source of potential trouble.
So, were they loathsome to their subject peoples? Probably, depending most likely on their status in their respective societies. But both were useful to some degree to both the EU and the US for many decades - until they weren’t.
Less than two years ago, Ghadaffi was seated right next to Barack and Michelle at a fancy dinner in NYC. Now he is Obama’s PE #1. Check back with the Ministy of Truth soon for further updates you need to be made aware of.
We are way beyond “what is right or wrong” at this stage of the economic crisis; either you have power or not. The proverbial “I’ll trade my pistol for your gold coins” transaction comes to mind. Think winners and losers.
“I stopped reading as soon as I saw the term “book smart”.”
A comment that scores high on the Unintentional Comedy Scale!
Sometimes book lernin’ done gits in the way a’ common sense, sho ’nuff. But bein’ corn-pone and all folksy-like cain’t git a satellite in LEO. Let’s not “go with our guts” on complicated issues and start putting everyone without callouses on their hands up against the wall.
PB …..Everything BB has done has aided the Culprits . Of course its at the expense of the many ,that was the whole idea ,past the pain to the many ,just like take the heist at the expense of the many .
I have been a big hater of BB for a long time and the whole
gang of thieves who like to call the winners and losers .
except it didn’t work and grandma can’t borrow anything and Wall street can borrow trillions to create bubbles around the world
“Thus God’s will is made plain”
I think I got that quote from Ivanhoe, it showed why lords can kill peasants at will, because God made them lords and God made the others peasants, just like he made fish and pigs all to be used by lords. Fun times ahead in the new dark ages
If you kill someone financially ,its like killing the peasant at will .
If you take away opportunty and choices ,its like killing the
peasants at will .
When I think of how many centuries it took for the common man/women to get a decent piece of the pie ,it’s a reversal to
Kings and Lords and slaves and peasants and no opportunity
in the mix .
A couple of days ago the MSM (main shills for Coporate America and Wall Street ) was counseling people on how to
accept having their paycheck cut in half .
You know its all about a psychological problem with not accepting being screwed ,it’s your fault you can’t pay your obligations with half the income .
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–U.S. stocks registered sharp gains despite another bleak dose of economic data as investors grew increasingly optimistic that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will act later this week to spur economic growth.
…
Bank of America was a notable laggard Tuesday amid a sea of green. The stock dropped 2%, on top of Monday’s 7.9% slide, as analysts worry about the bank potentially needing to raise a significant amount of capital as well as continued mortgage litigation woes. Bank of America shares have tumbled more than 35% this month.
Investors largely overlooked Tuesday’s release of the Richmond Fed’s regional manufacturing survey, which showed economic activity in the central Atlantic region declined sharply in August. The report attracted more attention than usual ahead of its release after dismal readings last week from the New York Fed’s Empire State index and the Philadelphia Fed’s index of manufacturing activity.
Instead, the market remains fixated on Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s scheduled speech in Jackson Hole, Wyo., on Friday. Investors are looking for potential signs of additional measures to stimulate the economy.
The Fed has opened the door to new easing measures, but investors are unclear as to what Bernanke has in store.
“When you have weak reports like we’ve seen from the regional manufacturing surveys, they’re basically giving Bernanke the breathing room to do whatever is necessary to act as a backstop measure for the economy and the markets and keep things from unwinding further,” said Jason Pride, director of investment strategy at Glenmede.
Many analysts say the Fed doesn’t have as much political support to announce a third full-fledged bond-buying program, commonly known as quantitative easing, or QE3.
“I scratch my head in thinking what Bernanke is going to do or say at this point,” said Maury Fertig, chief investment officer at Relative Value Partners. “I’m more concerned that if they put a QE3 in place, what if the market yawns? Then what?”
…
“if they put a QE3 in place, what if the market yawns? ”
I guarantee you the market will yawn, because the effect of QE3 was already priced in, which is why the DOW went up. If Bernanke gets to the podium and says “I got nuthin’,” then the market should lose the 400 or so points of anticipation gains.
Buying the dip is just a another word for counting your chickens before they’ve hatched.
BOSTON (MarketWatch) — It’s not a recession yet. Neither comprehensive data for July nor the more spotty data for August confirm this, according to David Kelly, chief market strategist for J.P. Morgan Funds.
But saying it’s so will probably make it so. “Overall, the chorus of economists and strategists predicting recession has grown louder in recent days and the withering impact of these pronouncements on confidence is sadly boosting the chances that they could be right,” Kelly just wrote in his weekly commentary.
Sam Stovall, the chief investment strategies for Standard & Poor’s Equity Research, is also among those who are preparing for the worst. “If the market action in 2008 taught us anything, it was: Be proactive and expect the worst,” Stovall wrote in his weekly commentary.
…
Executive: We at the network want a dog with attitude. He’s edgy, he’s in your face. You’ve heard the expression “let’s get busy”? Well, this is a dog who gets biz-zay! Consistently and thoroughly.
Krusty the Clown: So he’s proactive, huh?
Executive: Oh, God, yes. We’re talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.
Meyers: Excuse me, but proactive and paradigm? Aren’t these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I’m accusing you of anything like that. I’m fired, aren’t I?
WSJ Money & Investing Editor Francesco Guerrera stops by Mean Street and tells the story of Wall Street’s dirty little secret: traders don’t always follow the advice they give to their customers. AP Photo/Petr David Josek
To answer drummnj’s question of yesterday more seriously than my “hunch-based” answer of yesterday, suppose there was a cartel of G-7 central bankers who could either protect individual investors in gold or could protect money center banks (not to mention themselves) which are heavily invested in fiat currencies. Which group do you think their policies would be designed to protect during the duration of a financial panic?
Aug. 23, 2011, 10:08 p.m. EDT China’s gilded gold market
Much of the growing gold demand has been driven by individuals
By Fu Tao and Sun Yanxia
BEIJING ( Caixin Online ) — At 350 tons per year, China is the world’s largest producer of gold. And yet China’s statistics show that the country has been a net gold importer since the 1990s. Gold imports and exports have been tightly controlled by the People’s Bank of China, though new avenues for investment have emerged in recent years.
Marcus Grubb, the managing director of investment research and marketing for the World Gold Council (WGC), in June said that the world gold price had yet to fully internalize the additional demand that China’s investors and consumers were bringing to the table.
At the time, the WGC had just published figures that showed China’s demand for gold surpassing that of India for the first time. This has led many to ask where China’s gold market is headed next and to wonder how China’s expanding gold imports might apply upward pressure to global gold prices.
Silence golden at PBOC
One gold investor joked: “If the central bank were to signal that it was going to buy gold, the price would reach $2,000 overnight.”
…
Gold market is in a correction. Not surprising after the run it has had. I do like palladium more than gold right now but the increase in gold has not ended and will not end until all the broke azz nations have inflated away their debts. It is harder to do QE when gold is at a record price so I expected the fiat powers to manipulate it lower in the short term. In the longer term Chidia physical buying will drive it up.
Chindia would buy it when they have money to buy it. At least India has 90% debt to GDP ratio and is on the verge of being downgraded unlike US. China may have our dollars but they will buy our bonds to keep their exchange rate fixed. Moreover, with the commodities bubble collapsing, China is here for very hard times ahead. It will take down Australia also.
RE bubble in BRIC countries may burst this year which will also include Canada, Australia, Singapore, Israel etc., provided there is no more money printing by central banks especially BB.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-24 12:35:48
It will take down Australia also.
Hwy & Family is anxiously looking forward to sailing / long train rides and x3 cheers to the wonderful Aussie peoples, places & beers!
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2011-08-24 13:00:05
Martin, while I have been in the camp of a China slowdown for sometime, I do not see how or why they would slow below 8% growth. They have more than enough dollars saved to have a robust stimulus. India still has room to grow and high tech companies are still locating over there. Until the gap between wages closes more I can’t see either one of them going into a recession. Now, it is true even China is using more robots since wages have been going up, they still have a sufficient labor pool for another decade of growth.
I particularly do not understand this statement:
“Moreover, with the commodities bubble collapsing, China is here for very hard times ahead. It will take down Australia also.”
Since China is a major importer of commodities it would gain from a sharp drop in commodities. I actually do not see that happening but it would be good for them not bad. Australia it would be bad for but don’t confuse a reaction to peak production with a bubble.
Did you know the Federal Reserve secretly loaned up to as much as $1.2 trillion to U.S. and foreign banks? This information has now been released and we even know the institutions that got the bulk of the funds. Can you say, Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC). Due to the inflammatory nature of this information, the Fed has been reluctant to share it with Americans, but now it has now come out due to a lengthy Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) investigation by Bloomberg.
…
i was telling you guys years ago that BB was lending all the cuprits mucho bucks without proper reserves or backing for those loans .
What better way to be in a blackmailed position but to give entities
loans and thereafter you have to do their bidding or they will default .
BB just fell right into their trap because hes a jerk .
Its like giving a insolvent FB a new loan and than your stuck shoring them up forever.
The culprits blew it ,they should of gone BK . The casino games of
the shadow world of banking should of been busted and altered
from corruption ,rigged decks and stacked decks and faulty leverage . Its outlandish and absurd . Shore up the corrupted is the theme song .
This editorial is being reprinted from the Detroit Free Press, where it was first published.
The horror of the nation’s housing bust has left a trail of broken dreams — and of outrage, much of which must now be directed at the government agencies ostensibly seeking to help distressed homeowners while simultaneously pushing many of them out the door.
But as an investigation by the Detroit Free Press showed, a big contributor to the horror has been Fannie Mae, the quasi-private mortgage giant that was bailed out by the federal government, in part to help salve housing woes.
The federal regulator who oversees Fannie Mae needs to act swiftly and decisively to stop the institution’s dissembling, and force it to keep more people in their homes, as federal housing programs and Fannie Mae’s own public statements demand.
While Fannie Mae publicly touted its efforts to keep people in their homes, it was privately telling banks to foreclose on a specific percentage of delinquent mortgage holders.
Fannie Mae also engages in outright lying: Promises not to foreclose on anyone who was still in the modification process were repeatedly broken.
From the outside looking in, it is difficult to assess how much of this is incompetence and how much is purposeful misrepresentation. From the top, where the Obama administration has seemed to sincerely want to help people stay in their homes, it must feel like pushing on a string.
…
The market for U.S. housing continues to be smothered by the weight of troubled real estate loans and choked on low consumer expectations of being able to get a home loan, according to a recent survey from Fannie Mae.
The now government-owned mortgage giant reported that its quarterly survey of consumer sentiment, the National Housing Survey, found that 26% of survey respondents reported being underwater on their current mortgage loans – owing more on the loan than the property is worth – an increase of 3% from the first-quarter survey.
Further the survey found that homeowners who reported being underwater on their mortgages, even if they were current on the loans, experienced greater degrees of stress about their finances and their debts.
Perhaps the biggest challenge for credit union mortgage marketers, fully 53% of the consumers surveyed said that it would be very difficult for them to get a mortgage today and that percentage climbed to 71% among renters.
“Consumers are more cautious due to concerns over employment and household finances,” said Doug Duncan, vice president and chief economist of Fannie Mae. “As a result, consumer spending, which accounts for about 70% of the economy, ground to a halt in the second quarter. Consumers are more hesitant to take on additional financial commitments, and a setback to confidence means a setback to the recovery of the housing market.”
…
While the ivory tower and DC wonks may perceive deflation, J6P on main street is living in a Stagflationary Depression.
See also the Misery Index as computed using U6 unemployment and non-fake CPI that actually reflects the increased prices of food, energy, health care, education, et cetera.
Consumers are more hesitant to take on additional financial commitments, and a setback to confidence means a setback to the recovery of the housing market.”
stupid consumers don’t they know this will cause a recession
AUGUST 22, 2011, 10:31 A.M. ET
Fannie Mae Cuts Economic Growth Outlooks For 2011, 2012
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
Fannie Mae (FNMA) cut its economic growth outlook for this year and next, while also predicting the probability of another recession is “close to a coin toss.”
The mortgage giant said it expects 1.4% growth this year, down from last month’s estimate of 2.4%. Meanwhile, for 2012, it predicted growth of 2%, down from its July forecast of 3.1%.
“Key factors, including revisions to gross domestic product data, have revealed that we have a bigger hole to dig out of, which explains the consumer angst over the lack of employment growth,” said Fannie Mae Chief Economist Doug Duncan.
Fannie also said housing activity, with the exception of the rental housing market, is expected to weaken along with the overall economy due to a renewed decline in business and consumer confidence and a softening hiring trend. The rental vacancy rate declined to 9.2% in the second quarter, the lowest rate in nine years, which Fannie said is consistent with a declining home-ownership rate and suggests a rising number of households have shifted to renting over owning.
Why does Uncle Sam insist on attaching strings to its bulk home sales? Couldn’t they actually sell those taxpayer-owned homes for more if they just offered them to the highest bidder, sans strings? (This is an application of Le’Chatelier’s principle, for anyone who cares.)
The federal government would like to sell some of its huge portfolio of foreclosure homes to investors who will rent them out.
These are houses with loans backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration that lenders and investors have foreclosed on and handed back to these federally owned agencies to take the losses on.
Last week, the U.S. Treasury Department and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requested proposals from groups to buy the homes and turn them into rentals. The federal agencies didn’t mention a discount for buying the houses in bulk, but most investors will expect one.
The federal agencies say they want to pool the homes in portfolios, because the houses are selling too slowly on an individual basis.
What happened to the federal housing plan to help people modify their mortgages and keep their homes instead of losing them to foreclosure? An investor renting out the property likely will pay much less than what was owed on the mortgage.
…
It would make me somewhat nervous as a small landlord to think that the big boyz were about to get lots of cheap houses to rent out.
My prediction is the bulk sales will be focused on crappier houses in bad neighborhoods that the gov is probably holding in large amounts (eg vinyl sided subdivisions in the middle of nowhere, or streets of crappy houses in the hood). I doubt it would include their inventory of nicer houses in better hoods. I bet they can get more at individual auction for those than by discounting and selling en masse as rentals- except in some areas perhaps.
Assuming the government is hoping to attract some serious private capital to this venture, then only making the worst of the houses available for purchase will kill the program. Private investors will refuse to participate if they suspect that the nicer inventory will become available later.
Polly, it sounds as if the nicer inventory won’t be available at all — at least not in bulk.
And I’m guessing that the proposal is for somebody to buy the homes and rent them out to the FB who is still living there. Didn’t HBB think of a scenario just like that a few years ago? It’s a good way to bring in cash from the sidelines while “keeping people in their homes” at the same time, and you can do it by computer. It’s a win-win — unless, of course, you’re an individual renter, like most of HBB.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2011-08-24 10:07:44
“Polly, it sounds as if the nicer inventory won’t be available at all — at least not in bulk.”
Not yet.
I haven’t heard that the proposal is to rent to the people in place. I’ve heard that from economists/commentators, but they were talking about Fannie/Freddie doing it directly, not private investors. Selling to private investors and then severly restricting what they do with the property they now own is a good way to make a program dead on arrival. People don’t put capital at risk for that.
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-08-24 12:57:34
Not to mention, investors that I know largely refuse to rent a house back to an FB. “If they fell behind before, what makes you think they’ll pay me?”
Granted, if you can get a place cheaply enough for cash flow with the rent, it might make sense. But most experienced investors want to pick their own tenant.
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-24 13:04:29
Granted, if you can get a place cheaply enough for cash flow with the rent, it might make sense. But most experienced investors want to pick their own tenant.
Every investor I’ve known has chosen his/her tenants. And some of them are pretty darn picky.
We live in a nice area of So Ca, and the F&F homes on their websites are usually overpriced substandard REO’s. You’re right Alpha, they aren’t in desirable hoods.
We’re actually looking in white & blue collar mix NICE neighborhoods, and the homes on F&F’s REO websites never work for us.
I note the recent rate of U.S. new home sales per capita is far worse than it was back in 1963, when the U.S. population was only 188m, compared to its present level near 309m.
WASHINGTON - Sales of new homes fell in July for the third straight month, the government reported Tuesday in a sign that housing remains a drag on the economy.
If the current pace continues, 2011 would be the worst year for new-home sales in nearly half a century.
Sales fell nearly 1 percent in July to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 298,000, the Commerce Department said. That’s less than half the 700,000 sales that economists say represent a healthy market.
Last year, 323,000 homes were sold, the worst year on records that go back to 1963.
While new homes represent less than one-fifth of the housing market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs and $90,000 in taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
High unemployment, larger required down payments, and tougher lending standards are preventing many people from buying homes.
Plunging stocks and a growing fear that the United States could tip back into another recession also are keeping people from entering the housing market.
A slowdown in the U.S. economy has more than offset any boost from super-low mortgage rates, said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.
“A new home is a luxury that many Americans can no longer afford,” Dales said.
…
Who needs new homes when we have so many existing homes?
For the foreseeable future, new home construction will be driven solely by ego trips for the rich, the need to replace housing lost demolition and abandonment, and localized shortages (NY, SF).
And the new housing units due to replacement and localized shortages will be smaller and less opulent than in the bubble.
This isn’t just due to excess supply. Rising materials prices (business cycle adjusted) relative to average American’s income will make existing buildings more valuable, at least in places that are not in the midst of social and economic collapse.
‘No upside momentum’ with housing
06:43 PM PDT on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
BY TIMOTHY R. HOMAN
BLOOMBERG NEWS
Sales of new U.S. homes declined more than projected in July to the lowest level in five months, indicating the industry is struggling to stabilize two years into the economic recovery.
Purchases fell 0.7 percent to a 298,000 annual pace after a 300,000 rate in June that was slower than previously estimated, figures from the Commerce Department showed Tuesday in Washington. The median projection in a Bloomberg News survey of economists called for a 310,000 rate in July.
Builders are less inclined to start new projects as they face competition from cheaper existing homes and the prospect of foreclosures putting more unsold properties on the market.
Yeah, I’m more interested in the existing homes number these days. New homes tend to be built in new communities further from city centers, opposite to the current trend of where people are moving, big city or small.
Existing homes are more representative of what’s happening in the overall market.
The rise in U.S. new home sales during Greenspan’s tenure at the Fed to well above their historic range and their subsequent collapse to 50-year lows in the aftermath is readily apparent from a glance at the chart for new U.S. home sales back to 1963, which is included in the article linked below. Perhaps the Housing Bubble should be rechristened the Greenspan Bubble?
I am quite certain that you could find many economists at the Fed who would be able to hold up their end of a conversation about the importance of obeying the economy’s natural speed limit. For instance, you can’t invest in residential housing at rates forever above the growth rate of the population without later suffering a day of reckoning.
New Home Sales in July fell 0.7% from June, to a rate of 298,000. Relative to a year ago, sales are up 6.8%. While the year-over-year rebound is more than welcome, it is still a very dismal rate of New Home sales.
Also, there was a downward revision to the June numbers of 12,000 to 300,000. Thus, relative to where we thought we were, it could be seen as a 4.5% decrease. The July level was worse than the expected rate of 310,000.
The 15 lowest months on record (back to 1963) for new home sales have all been in the last 15 months. New home sales have only exceeded the 400,000 level three times since September of 2008 when the financial markets collapsed. The most recent time was in April 2010, as sales were inflated by the rush to get in under the wire and collect the homebuyer tax credit. Sales collapsed after that, and July comp is thus an easy one.
Relative to the peak of the housing bubble (7/05, 1.389 million), new home sales are down 78.5%. Prior to September 2008, there had only been 20 months in which new home sales were below the 400,000 level, with the most recent being in 1982. The graph below shows the history of new homes sales (blue, left scale) along with the growth in population (red, right scale), since presumably if you have more people, you will need more places for them to live.
Take a very close look at the relationship between new home sales and the grey recession bars. New home sales fall sharply before all recessions (with the exception of the dot.com bust-caused recession of 2001) and then start to increase sharply in the middle of, or towards the end of, the recession. That clearly is not happening this time around.
If you want to know why the recovery has been anemic so far, look no further than the graph above! New home sales are vital to the overall economy. If new homes are not selling, then homebuilders have no reason to build more of them. After all, that is very expensive inventory to sit on.
…
A year after the Federal Reserve chairman primed stocks with plans to buy up bonds, investors await a key speech for signs of another big move
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
BOB MOON: Aside from Libya, of course, we still have our own problems at home — mainly, the economy. We had a recovery that felt like it wasn’t. Now, several Wall Street economists say we’re staring another potential recession in the face. What to do? Experts are divided: Should we try more federal spending to stimulate the economy, or just stop the government meddling and let it grow on its own?
Later this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will signal what, if anything, the central bank will try to do to make everyone happy. Our New York bureau chief Heidi Moore reports.
HEIDI MOORE: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has picked up several nicknames: Big Ben, The Bearded One.
Quincy Krosby is a strategist for Prudential Financial, and she likes another nickname.
QUINCY KROSBY: Ben Bernanke has become the “Market Whisperer,” if you will. When he speaks, the market listens.
The markets will be listening when Bernanke speaks at a gathering of economists later this week. And what do they want to hear?
PETER BOOCKVAR: If you’re in the market, you want to hear Bernanke throw more money from the sky. You want him to do something to save you.
…
Wait, I thought these guys were all homespun and bootstrapped and the party of personal resposibility and masters of their own Randian destiny and they don’t need a nanny state oh no precious, and now they want Bernanke to SAVE THEM?????
Like this classic:
“How about this, (Mr.) President and new administration — Why don’t you put up a web site to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages, or would we like to, at least, buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people who might have a chance to actually prosper down the road, and reward people that could carry the water, instead of drink(ing) the water…We’re thinking of having a Chicago Tea Party in July. All you capitalists that want to show up to Lake Michigan, I’m going to start organizing.”
— Rick Santelli’s epic rant, February 2009.
I guess all I can do now is sit on the edge of my seat and try and contain myself while I wait for “The Bernanke” to pull another rabbit out of a hat. I’ll be sure not to miss out on this magical event.
From “Sir Greenspan” to “Bernanke The Magnificant”
Bailout Update - $1.5 Trillion Still Owed To Treasury, Fed
Source - PR Watch
A new study released today by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) shows that, despite rosy statements about the bailout’s impending successful conclusion from federal government officials, $1.5 trillion of the $4.8 trillion in federal bailout funds are still outstanding.
The analysis, presented in charts and an online table and program profiles, is based entirely on government records. This comprehensive assessment of the bailout goes beyond the relatively small Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) program to look at the rest of the Treasury and Federal Reserve’s multi-trillion dollar response to the financial crisis. It shows that while the TARP bailout of Wall Street (not including the bailout of the auto industry) amounted to $330 billion, the government also quietly spent $4.4 trillion more in efforts to stave off the collapse of the financial and mortgage lending sectors. The majority of these funds ($3.9 trillion) came from the Federal Reserve, which undertook the actions citing an obscure section of its charter.
“In order to understand the big picture on the bailout, you have to look beyond TARP and examine the trillions the Federal Reserve has disbursed to keep the big banks above water. $4.8 trillion went out the door to aid financial companies and repair the damage they caused to financial markets, and $1.5 trillion of that is still outstanding,” said Mary Bottari, director of CMD’s Real Economy Project.
Most of the bailout funds were comprised of aid to banks – the peak outstanding amount was $2.2 trillion in January 2009 – which took place at the height of the financial crisis in the form of loans with below-market interest rates and for questionable collateral to banks directly from the Treasury and Federal Reserve.Outstanding Bank Support vs. Mortgage Lending Support - July 2011 - In Billions
Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchases
CMD’s study also shows how the government is continuing to prop up the same banks that caused the crisis in its attempt to help the housing market. The government’s housing program – which peaked at $1.6 trillion outstanding in July 2010 – is aimed at keeping mortgage lending flowing by subsidizing deals Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac make with the banks. Treasury and the Federal Reserve’s main approach has been to buy more than a trillion dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so that the two government-sponsored enterprises can continue to purchase and bundle mortgages from the banks, which they sell to Fannie and Freddie at a profit. The banks also benefit from the hundreds of billions in direct loans the government has made to Fannie and Freddie, which the GSEs then turn around and make in insurance pay-outs to banks for mortgages that have gone bad.
This massive effort is in stark contrast to the mere $2 billion the Treasury has spent to directly help homeowners stay in their homes via the widely criticized Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) program. With housing prices continuing to falter and the United States approaching 9.2 million foreclosure filings since the beginning of 2008, HAMP can be described as nothing less than an abject failure.
“The Federal Reserve and the Treasury have spent $1.6 trillion in a bank-shot to save the mortgage lending market by using the same financial companies that got us into this mess,” said Conor Kenny, lead author of the study. “That’s more than 800 times what they’ve spent directly to keep homeowners in their houses, and the banks have made money off the whole thing.”
CMD’s analysis also shows how the $4.8 trillion bailout of the financial sector dwarfs the $600 billion that the Federal Reserve spent on the much-hyped “Quantitative Easing 2″ of 2010-2011 that was intended to help the broader economy – not just the financial sector – by lowering interest rates across the board and preventing deflation.
This here’s a story about Billy Joe and Bobbie Sue
Two young lovers with nothin’ better to do
Than sit around the house, get high, and watch the tube
And here is what happened when they decided to cut loose
They headed down to, ooh, old El Paso
That’s where they ran into a great big hassle
Billy Joe shot a man while robbing his castle
Bobbie Sue took the money and run
Go on take the money and run
Go on take the money and run
Go on take the money and run
Go on take the money and run
Make no mistake ,more than that is owed ,make no mistake ,more than that was dumped onto other balance sheets at the expense of
the taxpayers /
The accounting is bogus . I estimate about 7 trillion is more like it
or even more .
If you actually put a price tag on the real bail out ,if you conducted a analysis of all the ways the bail outs took their form ,
it would be a staggering amount .
Buttonwood Forty years on
An anniversary for the currency markets
Aug 13th 2011 | from the print edition
FORGET Watergate. For economic historians, Richard Nixon’s place in history is secure. He was the president who, 40 years ago, severed the link between global currencies and gold and ended the fixed-exchange-rate system.
Under the Bretton Woods regime, world currencies were pegged to the dollar, which in turn was tied to a set price of gold. Central banks had the right to convert their dollar holdings into bullion. But on August 15th 1971 Nixon, in the face of economic difficulties, closed the gold window, devalued the dollar against bullion and imposed a 10% surcharge on imports. The era of paper money and floating exchange rates had arrived.
…
… there were no asset bubbles to speak of in the Bretton Woods era and (not coincidentally) scarcely any financial crises. Between 1945 and 1971, the worst calendar-year loss suffered on Wall Street was a 14.1% decline in 1957.
Perhaps the lesson of the past 40 years is that neither a fixed nor a floating-rate system is a panacea. Many governments have used currency pegs as a shortcut towards economic credibility without the structural reforms needed to ensure their economies remained competitive. Floating rates create the temptation for governments to drive down their currencies and grab a bigger share of world trade. That temptation is very strong at the moment and could lead to further political tensions if America opts for another round of quantitative easing. In a world of competing devaluations, gold keeps driving higher. It surged above $1,800 an ounce on August 11th. In terms of the old gold measure, the dollar has devalued by 98% since the end of the Bretton Woods era.
ADDICTS always crave one more hit. With stockmarkets slumping over the past two weeks investors hoped that the Federal Reserve would unveil a third round of “quantitative easing” (QE), the creation of money to bolster asset prices, on August 9th. The second round, announced in August last year, had triggered an equity rally in late 2010.
Instead of pure heroin, investors got methadone in the form of a commitment from the Fed to keep rates at their current low levels for another two years. While Wall Street managed a late rally on the day (the Dow gained almost 430 points, or 4%), the Fed’s hit gave only a brief rush. Share prices resumed their fall on August 10th.
There was a more sustained reaction to the actions of the European Central Bank, which started buying Italian and Spanish government bonds on August 8th. Though the size of the buying programme was unknown, the effect on the bond markets was dramatic. The Spanish ten-year yield fell from more than 6% to 5% within two days.
At least the central banks are having a positive effect, however temporary. Politicians, meanwhile, have left investors with serious doubts about their ability to handle the crisis. European leaders have moved from an initial stance of denial about the seriousness of the region’s debt problems through a series of sticking-plaster solutions as the rot spread. American leaders, for their part, flirted with the prospect of a default before reaching a deal that neither helped the economy in the short term nor did enough to improve the government’s finances in the long term.
…
The earthquake is barely gone and now a hurricane’s a comin’.
I guess today should be emergency preparedness day… I check my food storage every three months or so, so I think I’m good. I doubt they’ll evacuate anyone, but I think I’ll take a trip to the store and the gas station just in case.
His 1993 book “The Geography of Nowhere” accurately predicted the Epic Fail of the auto-dependant exurban model of infinite growth.
How’s that working out now in the Inland Empire, Palm Beach County, Queen Creek AZ, and the other Sunbelt drive-til-you-qualify locales?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2011-08-24 07:52:51
Queen Creek and the Inland Empire are suffering because they were major hot spots of the housing bubble. If the book predicted problems in places like that due to high gasoline prices, it didn’t predict anything that has happened.
Comment by CrackerBob
2011-08-24 11:13:23
To this point, the housing collapse had nothing to do with “Peak Oil”. It may happen, so may many ugly things. The housing collapse was pure speculation and fraud.
Also, during the next Depression, Kunstler believes everyone down South will pack up and want to move to upstate New York. I really doubt that will happen. I was raised in Florida without A/C, you can live without it if you have the right kind of house. However, you cannot exist in Troy, NY without power or food shipped in from warmer climes.
Comment by Steve J
2011-08-24 12:10:14
The only signs I see of the coming carpocalypse is fewer Hummers on the road.
Comment by oxide
2011-08-24 12:34:25
“However, you cannot exist in Troy, NY without power or food shipped in from warmer climes.”
Well, they did it 150 years ago. But I don’t think you could do it with today’s population; we’d go through wood far too fast.
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2011-08-24 12:54:24
“However, you cannot exist in Troy, NY without power or food shipped in from warmer climes.”
Troy was first settled in 1787 and became a city in 1816. Miami was first settled in 1825 and incorporated in 1896.
Eskimos and Laplanders survived in harsher climates than Troy, NY.
Comment by CrackerBob
2011-08-24 13:46:44
Of course all of that is true. However, my point was that given a world without fossil fuels, I would much rather live in a warm climate. As I stated, I have lived without A/C and it is tolerable; but not preferable. That said, any rural people will weather the withdrawl of modernity better than urbanites.
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-08-24 18:29:21
Have you guys ever been to Troy, NY? You don’t want to subsist there…. hell…. you don’t want to thrive there.
I was in Costco yesterday and went passed the emergency food rations in a pail. Dehydrated vegetarian meals just do not appeal to me if the civilized world is really ending on December 21, 2012. I went for the spam. It has a shelf life of many years. Don’t eat the stuff usually but I will admit to liking it. I figure that I will go out drinking red wine and eating spam.
Ah, there’s nothing like a Spam & Velveeta sandwich with Miracle Whip dressing. Round out this culinary selection with a tall glass of Kool-Aid and two Twinkies.
I didn’t say it was good, I just said there was nothing like it.
Wall Street is waiting with baited breath for BB’s rescue plan. With such widespread anticipation of a QE3 announcement this Friday, it is hard to conceive how the Fed could surprise to the upside.
Aug. 24, 2011, 6:12 a.m. EDT U.S. stock futures drop ahead of data
Bernanke’s Jackson Hole appearance remains main event
By William L. Watts, MarketWatch
FRANKFURT (MarketWatch) — U.S. stock futures fell Wednesday, pointing to a lower open for Wall Street after two days of gains as investors awaited data on demand for durable goods and Friday’s speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.
Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJ1U -0.63%) dropped 76 points to 11,065. Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures (SP1U -0.57%) declined 8.3 points to 1,150.30, while Nasdaq 100 futures (ND1U -0.56%) fell 14 points to 2,110.
“I think the market is in a wait-and-see mode” as investors weigh prospects the Fed chairman will signal readiness to delve further into the central bank’s tool box to deliver monetary stimulus, said Steen Jakobsen, chief economist at Saxo Bank.
Bernanke is set to address an annual gathering of international central bankers and economists in Jackson Hole, Wyo., on Friday.
Gains by U.S. equities on Monday and Tuesday after a four-week global rout were tied in part to speculation Bernanke would use the speech to signal the Fed would take additional actions, including possibly a third round of quantitative easing, or QE3, to counteract a flagging economy.
Bernanke used last year’s Jackson Hole speech to lay the groundwork for operations known as QE2, helping to trigger a months-long rally in equities.
Jakobsen, however, said surveys indicate expectations Bernanke will commit to further action are more neutral, leaving room for an upside surprise if the Fed chief delivers a more detailed plan.
…
No, I didn’t refinance the Arizona Slim Ranch to buy a hot little car. Nor did I buy a second Ranch to rent out “as an investment.”
What did I do?
I fell for a former coworker-turned New York Life agent’s sales pitch, that’s what. You’ve probably heard this pitch a time or two yourself: Life insurance that’s being sold as (cue up the drumroll) an investment.
As I’ve said here many times, I’m single and have no dependents. Which doesn’t exactly place me in the center of the target market for life insurance.
So, now it looks like I’m stuck with something I don’t really want or need. And I’m wondering how hard it would be to get out of the insurance contract and find some real investments. You know, the sort of thing that you don’t need an insurance agent to find.
Then don’t hesitate. Call and tell them you want to reverse your decision. In these parts I seem to recall a three day legal window for buyer’s remorse.
Just cancel it. If you have to take a loss then take it (call it tuition) and move on.
Life’s too short to sweat the small stuff.
Which reminds me:
Deborah Tannen (who wrote “You Just Don’t Understand”) said men and women use language for different purposes in that men use language to fix problems (i.e Cancel the policy) while women use language to cope with problems (i.e What am I ever to do?).
Some problems cannot be fixed (i.e. Dad is drunk yet again but we can’t boot his sorry ass out because he is the one who brings home the bacon so we are stuck).
This is when women have the edge because they know how to cope with the problem. Men get frustrated because the unsolvable problem never gets solved.
If anyone cares to pay attention, the decisions coming from Congress appear to be made by women rather than by men.
There is a view espoused by somebody whose name I don’t remember that notes that groups of men (committees) make decisions (coping decisions) along the same lines as women would make.
Deborah Tannen (who wrote “You Just Don’t Understand”)
I should point out that in my college courses her books were used as an example of popular/junk “science” with regards to interpersonal communication. Same with John Gray’s “Men are From Mars, Women are From Venus”.
Of course that doesn’t mean their books don’t contain valuable insights…
I’m assuming you bought something like a whole life policy? Did you just purchase it and pay the first premium? Or have you had it a few years? If you’ve had it a few years already it might be worth it to take whatever the cash value is and get out of the policy.
Whole life isn’t the worst thing in the world (I mean, you could have bought a mcmansion in Oro Valley in 2007), there’s something to be said about having the guaranteed payout at the end of 20 years or what have you, but you’re right in that for someone like yourself it might not make the most sense. You could have bought another annuity that might have been less expensive.
Definitely call the salesman if you just bought it and see if you have any recourse.
I’m assuming you bought something like a whole life policy? Did you just purchase it and pay the first premium? Or have you had it a few years? If you’ve had it a few years already it might be worth it to take whatever the cash value is and get out of the policy.
I bought a whole life policy (read: commission-rich environment for insurance salesmen) and paid the first premium.
I’m trying to reach my attorney to find out what my legal rights of cancellation are in AZ. It’s still before business hours, so I’m getting his law office’s voice mail. But I’ll keep trying.
Essentially, what I plan to do is follow combotechie’s advice, “Just cancel it. If you have to take a loss then take it (call it tuition) and move on.”
And, BTW, I can make gifts to that organization without running them through an insurance company first.
Matter of fact, I’m about to step up my monthly donation, which they get right now. They don’t have to wait for me to kick the bucket.
As for kicking the proverbial bucket, the attorney I’m trying to reach also handles my will. Which needs updating. So, after this insurance matter is handled, we’ll deal with the will.
Insurance agent is a guy who worked as a fund raiser at the same organization that employed me back in the late 1980s/early 1990s. (I worked in that outfit’s PR and publications office.)
Guy lost his fund raising job a few months back and now he’s with New York Life. As insurance companies go, it’s one of the better ones. Weiss Ratings even gives it an A, and Weiss is a pretty tough grader.
Well, it didn’t take me long to figure out that:
1. Despite all of this guy’s talk about investments, what New York Life is in business to sell is insurance. Specifically, life insurance. And what does a single person with no dependents like me need life insurance for?
2. As investments go, life insurance is no great shakes. What with all of the commissions and fees involved, it’s a pretty crummy investment. You can do a lot better with a low-cost company like Vanguard. Which sells investments, not insurance in drag.
3. The guy’s been going on and on about the charitable donation aspect of insurance policies, but you know what? You can donate to your heart’s content without running the money through an insurance company.
Okay, now here comes the really bad part: The guy is planning an upcoming private party, and he wanted me to photograph it. Now, this would be an evening event with several hundred people. Truth be told, I priced the proposal rather low, but he couldn’t even afford that. So, no photo gig for me.
But he’s asking me if I can still come so he can refer me to people. Which sounded very good at first, but then I got to thinking things through.
I don’t know about you, but I’ve never found noisy parties being given by people I know to be good sources of business referrals. Because people are there to, well, party. Have a good time. They’re not thinking about work.
Furthermore, there’s what I call the Holy Grail of Business Marketing. It consists of three things:
1. Word of mouth referrals to bring you business.
2. Great search engine positioning to bring you business.
3. Social media that will bring you business.
In almost 20 years of being involved with this, that, or other business venture, I’ve never found the Holy Grail items to be very effective. As another HBB-er has put it, they’re not a substitute for boots-on-the-ground selling.
2. Great search engine positioning to bring you business.
Well, slim, all eyes can say is that without the internet ad’s eyes would have never gotten order$ from Scotland / Germany / Mexico / India / Caribbean Islands / Australia / Spain etc. etc. etc., on account’s I really don’t hanker to the $tandard “bidne$$” networking template of “slap-one-another-on-the-back-whilst-golfing-poledancedrooling-tradeshowshenanigan’$” but eyes was a manufacturer, thus perhaps that is the difference of POV.
In fact, in my new future ‘Bidne-$$” endeavor I’m going to run local print ad’s [how most folks up here in the hindersville still gets idea's, + [rumor's] that will point them to my www site, [thus not needing many catalog's to print & mail]
So it was a mixture of quasi-charity, or something akin to it, and it seeming like a better idea at the time than it really was. I bet most of us here on the HBB are the ’step back and consider this move’ types, and I’d bet many of us have still gotten caught anyway. If it makes you feel better, my purchase of YLO.CA didn’t even have an old associate behind it; just me jumping in without thinking.
“I don’t know about you, but I’ve never found noisy parties being given by people I know to be good sources of business referrals.”
I bet the purpose of the party is for your old associate to renew links with potential clients. Bet he wouldn’t like to here your take on thing. Trying to refer people to your business might help set the mood as business and fun.
I’ve had a few minor encounters with the insurance/investment industry. My impression was that the criteria for getting hired are:
1) Knowing lots of people (who are not poor.)
2) Being personable.
3) Not being to well versed in finance. It’s easier to sell a substandard product to friends, family and acquaintances if you don’t understand that it’s substandard.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-08-24 11:48:38
I’ve had a few minor encounters with the insurance/investment industry. My impression was that the criteria for getting hired are:
1) Knowing lots of people (who are not poor.)
2) Being personable.
3) Not being to well versed in finance. It’s easier to sell a substandard product to friends, family and acquaintances if you don’t understand that it’s substandard.
The fellow I’ve been dealing with fits the above three items to a tee.
Especially on item #3. I’ve been amazed at how little this guy knows about finance. I mean, jeez-Louise, even I know more, and that’s not saying a whole lot.
So, a virtual toast of your favorite beverage to you, Al. You’ve been very helpful. Thank you!
I thought life insurance was for people who had families depending on them for support. In any event, I learned in a personal finance class in college that anything but term life was a ripoff.
Take comfort in the fact that you are not alone. When I was a young medical resident, I got suckered into the life-insurance-as-investment scheme. I actually had to PAY to get out of the contract. That was painful.
This contract is less than a month old, and the day is still young here. Which means that I have a call in to my attorney, and he hasn’t gotten back to me yet.
I don’t think that this one will be too onerous to get out of, but I want to talk to the attorney anyway.
We’ve all been there. I got talked/guilt-ed into a whole life policy about 17 years ago. A “friend” of mine just got out of the military and was starting a new career. A couple years after I bought it, the life insurance company had a class action suit brought against them, something about deceptive sale practices. Long story, short I got all of my money back and a cancelled policy and have had term life ever since.
Way back when I was an E4 in the navy with a wife and a couple young kids, I go into NCOA to get a discount on car insurance (which was a good deal).
I get this hard sell about how the government $100K life insurance is way to little… at such a young age I can lock in a low life insurance rate for life… Can add money to an attached savings account that pays x% interest(way better than bank accounts)… blah blah.
I bought it hook line and stinker.
Year later I hear how NCOA is pushing these really bad “investment” whole life policies that have HUGE upfront fees to pay the FAT comissions to the salesmen. They use retired non-comissioned officers who the young military guys trust, and the young military guys are being fleeced.
You pay like 10x as much as it would cost for term insurance, and the plan doesn’t begin building a redemption value for like 5 years while it earns back the fat initial fees.
I ended up putting off cancelling it for years, compounding the bad decision.
I ended up putting off cancelling it for years, compounding the bad decision.
Which is precisely what woke me up around 4 a.m. this morn. I was thinking of keeping the thing going for a while.
Then that mean little voice inside of me barked, “Slim, if you’re having this much buyer’s remorse now, it’ll only get worse. So, get out. Now.”
And, while I was out running errands on my bike, I thought about that employer that the insurance guy and I had in common. While I worked there, he wasn’t one of my closest friends. No way.
Matter of fact, I had no idea that he was still in Tucson until I saw him a few months ago. It was right before he got fired from his fund raising job.
This conversation reminds me that my 20-year-level-premium term life insurance expires in *gulp* less than 3 years. When I took out the policy, 20 years seemed like a really long time.
Here in Canada we have Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs). They allow us to put away money each year which can grow without taxation until the wee ones aren’t so wee anymore and going off to school. Fed Gov chips in 20%, and there’s a limit that I can’t remember and am too lazy to look up.
After my little ones were born, we get contacted by a salesperson who is offering what’s called a Group RESP plan. Investors were grouped into cohorts based on when they signed up. The rep was quite personable and had a good presentation, along with some pretty glossy written material. My spidey sense started tingling, and I started asking some detailed questions which were responded to with slick non-answers. I started digging into the written material in front of the rep while my wife asked other questions. Finally the rep left, and never bothered with a follow up phone call.
She knew that I was going to figure out how the thing worked. The Group RESP plan was a non-profit, but the sales agency was for-profit and reps on commission. There were brutal upfront fees (well hidden in the literature), the fund invested in low risk gov bonds, but they advertised high rates of return. The trick was that once you signed up you had to keep paying that same amount every month until the juniors were going off to school. If you missed payments and couldn’t make them up in short order, then you were out of the plan. You’d get your contributions back, but not the 20% gov match or any interest which went to the rest of the cohort.
So basically, the good returns for those that hung in and the commissions and fees were payed for by the suckers that dropped out.
Derek Kravitz,
AP Real Estate Writer
Tuesday August 23, 2011, 4:42 pm EDT
A telling sign of how bad things have gotten for the housing industry: Prices have dropped more since the recession started, on a percentage basis, than during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
And it took 19 years for prices to fully recover after the Depression.
And it took 19 years for prices to fully recover after the Depression.
Exactly why ol’ Hwy’s in no hurry to add select raw land for my children & my childrens children to fight & argue, over & about, a little further along down the road.
(That, & future innovative improvements in home related technologies)
Mandatory evacuations are ordered in our area any time the wind is expected to be above 50mph. Ambulances cannot drive above a 50mph wind speed. We are also on the coast with water and bridges all around. No orders yet but they are not meeting until Thursday.
All eyes are on Jackson Hole. Republicans believe the government has no business doing anything to preserve values in the labor market. The question for Republican Ben Bernanke is, how about the stock market?
US Mortgage Purchase Applications at 15-Year Low
24 Aug 2011 | By: Reuters
U.S. home mortgage applications for purchases fell to a nearly 15-year low last week as resurgent worries about the strength of the economy kept buyers at bay, an industry group said on Wednesday.
The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage application activity, which includes both refinancing and home purchase demand, fell 2.4 percent in the week ended Aug.19.
The seasonally adjusted gauge of loan requests for home purchases tumbled 5.7 percent to its lowest level since December 1996, the MBA said.
Refinance demand also sagged as interest rates rose, with the refinance index slipping 1.7 percent.
“Another week of volatile markets and rampant uncertainty regarding the economy kept prospective homebuyers on the sidelines, with purchase applications falling to a 15-year low,” Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s vice president of research and economics, said in a statement.
“This decline impacted borrowers across the board, with purchase applications for jumbo loans falling by more than 15 percent and purchase applications for the government housing programs falling by 8.2 percent.” The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 79.8 percent of total applications from 78.8 percent the week before.
Fixed 30-year mortgage rates averaged 4.39 percent, up from 4.32 percent.
GE Healthcare cutting 81 jobs
By John Schmid of the Journal Sentinel
GE Healthcare Ltd. is cutting 81 jobs at its Milwaukee and Waukesha facilities, or 1.2% of the company’s positions in southeastern Wisconsin, the medical technologies division of the General Electric Co. said Tuesday.
In response to questions, a GE spokesman said notifications were sent out on Friday and that GE is reducing staff in response to the economic uncertainty in the U.S. and Europe.
GE, which employs about 6,500 in southeastern Wisconsin, provided few other details.
The MegaInc.$,…they’re $uffering $o! Hurry! reduce/eliminate their taxe$, hurry,… Agonie$ & Pain$, help ‘em!.
“Of the roughly $90 billion of profits repatriated in 2004, Pfizer was by far the biggest beneficiary, saving $11 billion in taxes, Johnston recalls. “They started destroying jobs the day they brought it back” and have cut 40,000 U.S. jobs in the ensuing years.”
Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker / Yahoo:
There’s a good chance any “grand bargain” on the deficit will include a one-time tax holiday to allow U.S.-based corporations to repatriate overseas profits, estimated at more than $1 trillion. The issue has been out of the headlines lately but has the support of a host of Fortune 500 companies, including Apple, Cisco, Duke Energy and Oracle, as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Taxing the System
The “fundamental problem” with a tax holiday is that it sends a message to corporations to “‘keep more profits offshore and then you can bring ‘em back and pay virtually no tax,’” Johnston says.
Furthermore, there’s no good way to ensure that a tax holiday will lead to job creation, he says, citing the last time this was tried — via the 2004 Jobs Creation Act — as evidence of the folly of tax holidays.
Meanwhile, tax holidays on overseas assets do nothing for purely domestic-focused companies, which tend to be smaller and family owned, Johnston notes.
“…if you tax them less, they can hire more people.”
JP Morgan May Take Over Bank Of America
By 24/7 Wall St.
There is a rumor circulated on Wall St. that JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) will takeover Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) within the week. The government will support the deal with a $100 billion investment in preferred shares issued by the combined entity. Alternatively, the government may guarantee the value of a large pool of Bank of America assets. The word is that Treasury Secretary Geithner has discussed the transaction with JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.The “merger” would completely destroy the value of BAC’s common shares.
The government feels that the deal may be necessary as Bank of America struggles unsuccessfully to close several transactions to bolster its balance sheet. The Wall Street Journal reported that the financial firm will need to raise $200 billion which would be another possible event that would wipe out common shareholders.
Bank of America’s fortunes have been hurt by events in just the last few days. A New York State judge agreed to allow institutional investors to intervene in an $8.5 billion settlement between the bank and groups that lost money on mortgage-backed securities. China Construction Bank Corp said Bank of American will continue to hold 50% of its share in the foreign financial firm. Many investors hoped Bank of America would sell its entire stake to raise money. Several analysts believe that the costs of owning mortgage firm Countrywide Credit have grown unexpectedly large.
Under federal law, JP Morgan and Bank of America could not combine because together they would have too large a share of several financial markets in the US. Treasury would apparently work with other government agencies to have those rules suspended and then the new combined bank would sell assets to get back into compliance later.
777 School Employees Will Be Let Go, in the Largest Layoff Under
By FERNANDA SANTOS The New York Times
Nearly 780 employees of the New York City Education Department will lose their jobs by October, in the largest layoff at a single agency since Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg took office in 2002.
The layoffs are a direct consequence of budget cuts to schools, which have occurred in each of the last four years, forcing principals to make tough decisions about what and whom to do without. Most of the burden will be shouldered by one labor union, District Council 37, which represents 95 percent of the workers who will be let go.
School aides were saved from layoffs last year by federal money, but 438 — about 5 percent of their ranks — will now lose their jobs. Some 82 parent coordinators, about 6 percent of the total, will also lose their jobs, essentially severing the main link between parents and administrators at dozens of schools.
The budget cuts have also cost 2,186 teachers their full-time, fixed assignments at city schools. Teachers were spared from layoffs, however, because of an agreement brokered in June between the Bloomberg administration and their union, which offered small concessions in exchange for job security for its 200,000 members, including 75,000 teachers.
A spokesman for Mr. Bloomberg, Marc La Vorgna, placed the blame for the layoffs squarely on District Council 37 and the other six unions whose members will also be let go. “The unions involved would not agree to any real savings that could have saved these jobs,” he said in a statement.
Wikipedia says approximately 1.1 Million students attend NYC public schools. Above article says there are 75,000 teachers. Doing some basic math, the student/teacher ratio works out to about 14.66 students per teacher.
ARKADELPHIA, Ark. (AP) — An international compressor manufacturer has laid off 100 workers at its Arkadelphia factory because of a seasonal slow-down in the industry.
Danfoss Scroll Technologies said in a statement the layoffs of 60 full-time employees and all temporary workers were effective this past Thursday. Officials said they had to adjust the business in order to secure its long-term success.
Danfoss Scroll general manager Paul Dean told the Arkadelphia Siftings Herald that about 40 temporary workers were affected and about 400 people are still employed.
The statement also said officials have eliminated the factory’s third-shift in production and will operate with one shift in assembly and one in machining.
The company also has implemented productivity improvement efforts to ensure it is price-competitive in the residential air conditioning market.
I am thinking a good many people may be disappointed when the Bernake releases his statement from Jackson’s Hole. I think it will be mostly hot air and no QE-111 launch at this time. I hope I am correct.
You have to admit, reading the financial press this week is downright gut busting.
During the “prosperity” of the past few decades we watched the media/popular culture lionize CEOs, big shareholders, hedgies, etc. They were the astronauts of our age. We were urged to mimic their every move lest we be left behind.
Now these men, these pillars of our enlightened modern age, hang on every word dripping from the lips of a little bald man.
U.S. housing faces extra drag - low appraisals
NEW YORK | Wed Aug 24, 2011
(Reuters) - When Sean McGowan signed a contract to buy a New Jersey home in November, he didn’t expect he’d still be living with his parents nearly a year later.
The deal fell through after two appraisals came in tens of thousands of dollars below the contract price, part of a wider trend of differences over property valuations that is compounding the U.S. housing crisis.
“It was very frustrating. We really wanted to move in,” said McGowan, a 31-year-old real estate lawyer.
Many housing experts say low appraisals are yet another headwind for a housing market already suffering from a plunge in prices, high unemployment and tight credit.
Lenders are forced to cap their mortgage loans at the value set by appraisers and buyers and sellers often can’t agree on how to make up the difference with an original deal price.
“It’s hard to talk about any recovery of the housing market and home prices until the appraisal issue is squared away, and that is a broad issue,” said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance, a Maryland-based trade publication.
Sixteen percent of Realtors reported contract cancellations in July, matching June’s level, which was the highest since March 2010, when the National Association of Realtors began collecting data.
Nine percent reported contract delays due to low appraisals, and 13 percent reported a contract was renegotiated to a lower price because an appraisal came in below the original price in the last three months, the NAR said.
Appraisers in the United States have long been used to controversy for their role in the country’s housing market.
The appraisal system has been reformed in recent years to put a stop to the high estimates of property values that even appraisers admit helped inflate the housing bubble.
Many industry watchers argue the new regime has caused the pendulum to swing too far to the other side, inadvertently causing the opposite problem: artificially low appraisals.
“The industry, both from a lending perspective and appraising perspective, has gotten as outrageously conservative now as they were outrageously aggressive a few years ago,” said Rick Sharga, senior vice president of data firm RealtyTrac.
Homeowner Groups Sue to Force Foreclosures
By John Gittelsohn - Aug 24, 2011 Bloomberg
Members of the Vintage East Condominium Association in Miami Beach got tired of waiting for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) to foreclose on unit 9, so they sued the bank in February to take control of the property.
In June, more than four years after the owner stopped making payments, a judge ruled that JPMorgan lost its claim to the $144,000 mortgage. The apartment is now on the market for $87,500, and the association may stave off insolvency with proceeds from the sale and a new owner who pays monthly dues, said Jane Losson, a board member at the complex. Four of the 11 other owners at the property are also behind on dues.
“I find it an outrage that the bank had decided to do nothing and the other owners got stuck,” Losson, who’s had her Vintage East condo since 2004, said in a telephone interview. “If we get this unit sold, we’ll have a little money.”
Financially troubled condo associations are taking banks to court as foreclosure delays enable delinquent homeowners to stay in their buildings for years, often without paying dues that keep boards running. The groups start by pressuring lenders to speed up home seizures and take over payment of the monthly fees. In extreme situations, like the Vintage East case, associations may force banks to give up rights to the property.
“The lenders are stalling foreclosures,” Ben Solomon, the Miami Beach attorney for the Vintage East association, said in a telephone interview. “Our complaints say the banks abandoned their interest and either need to accept responsibility for the title or walk away.”
‘Mortgage Terminator’
Solomon, whose Association Law Group represented homeowner boards in 16 Florida counties with 15,000 delinquent owners, also won what he calls “mortgage terminator” lawsuits in claims against Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), Deutsche Bank AG (DB) and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), according to court records.
About 60 million people, or one in five Americans, live in residences with condo or homeowner associations, according to the Community Associations Institute, a trade group in Falls Church, Virginia. States with some of the highest foreclosure rates — Florida, Nevada, California and Arizona — are also among those with the biggest share of populations in homeowner associations, said Frank Rathbun, spokesman for the 30,000- member trade group. The associations maintain residents’ common interests such as parking lots, roofs, landscaping and trash removal.
“About 50 percent of our members said the housing crisis and economic downturn have had a severe or serious impact on their association,” Rathbun said in a telephone interview.
“In his nearly 11 years as the state’s chief executive, Perry, now running for the Republican presidential nomination, has overseen more executions than any governor in modern history: 234 and counting. That’s more than the combined total in the next two states —Oklahoma and Virginia —since the death penalty was restored 35 years ago.
He vetoed a bill that would have spared the mentally retarded, and sharply criticized a Supreme Court ruling that juveniles were not eligible for the death penalty. He has found during his tenure only one inmate on Texas’s crowded death row he thought should receive the lesser sentence of life in prison.”
There’s nothing more all-American than executing retards, except perhaps dropping bombs on brown and black people. USA! USA! USA!
Certainly not. The executions probably were supported by a majority of his constituents. It’s just sad that this country remains on a short list of nations with the death penalty that includes China, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and other gems of human rights.
That must feel odd, being a devoted oath commited “TrueEvangelicalist™” whilst doing your daily job of signing a State issued death decree for a human animal.
It’s Perry’s fault for vetoing a law that would have spared the mentally retarded, who are probably more likely to be railroaded into false confessions.
He vetoed a bill that would have spared the mentally retarded, and sharply criticized a Supreme Court ruling that juveniles were not eligible for the death penalty.
Compassionate Conservative + Jesus the woodworker from Oaxaca + white “cowboy” hat = Sis boom rah! Judgment Day!, Sis boom rah! Judgment Day!
“let those who are without sin pull the 1st switch…” or something like that.
“I am not a big death penalty fan, mostly because I don’t trust government prosecutors.”
Yes. Reasonable minds can disagree about the concept of the ultimate punishment. But the wheels of justice do not turn smoothly. In a perfect world, we could trust ourselves/our govt. to execute those who ‘deserve it’. Justice is not a perfect process, therefore I oppose the death penalty, even if some who deserve it have to live. I can only guess the number of innocents who have been executed at the hands of the state.
once the innocent project agrees they have the right person…then make it a swift execution no more then 30 days.
I knew a few lawyers who did work on these type cases and once the DNA proved they had the right person, they pretty much stopped working on the case because they only had so much $$$ to spend.
Next Stimulus Must Be for the Housing Market: Hays
By Matt Nesto | Breakout
As investors anxiously wait to see whether or not Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has another rabbit up his sleeve, at least one pro is calling for the next round of stimulus to come from the government rather than the Federal Reserve.
“If you look at the economy, it is slowly coming back, but there is one area - a massive area - that has hit this economy for the last two years, and its housing,” says Don Hays, President and Chief Investment Strategist of Hays Advisory. He wants policymakers to try something new and different that will jump-start the entire economy, not just the banking sector. As much as stimulus has become a much harder sell in Washington, D.C. these days, I think a populist pitch to prop up housing might just catch on.
Hays is particularly fond of a proposal that is being circulated by Ed Yardeni that would make rental income tax-free for a decade to encourage investment into vacant homes. Given the dubious benefits derived from the first few rounds of stimulus and easing, a handout to housing seems at least worth a try.
“We have 2.2 million people in the housing construction industry that are still out of work and cannot get a job so that is the place that has to be stimulated,” Hays says. “We think that is the one area that has not had the same long term encouragement.”
Normally, when economies are rebounding, housing is a locomotive. But this time Hays says it has been a “terrible laggard” that has been left behind. Whether you agree or disagree, the reality is that housing plays an outsized role in our economy and to attempt to repair one without the other just doesn’t make sense.
As Hays sees it, a shot-in-the-arm for housing would lead to knock-on effect for the broader economy, a spiral-effect that would feed on itself for the better. “People feel more optimistic. Banks start lending. Companies start hiring more and it sort of feeds on itself and that’s what we have to have, that stimulus, that fuel, to kick-start the economy.”
Hays is clear in pointing out that this is not an investment idea, but something for Washington, D.C. to consider as a starting pointing at a time of great hunger for fresh solutions. Nothing ventured, nothing gained?
Hays is particularly fond of a proposal that is being circulated by Ed Yardeni that would make rental income tax-free for a decade to encourage investment into vacant homes. Given the dubious benefits derived from the first few rounds of stimulus and easing, a handout to housing seems at least worth a try.
As if we don’t have enough rental vacancies already. And where are all the tenants going to come from?
Well, further up today’s thread we hear of the gov’t desire to move foreclosed properties in bulk to investors. So, if rental income were to be made tax exempt would that not be a huge incentive for VC and other big players to sop up as much inventory on the cheap as possible?
Somehow that doesn’t sound like it will lead to any kind of narrowing of the wealth gap, let alone equate to a tax increase on the “rich”. Sounds more like a gimme for the big boys, a tax shelter hid in plain sight.
Unless those houses sit empty, they aren’t taken off the market. Turning them into rentals will just drive down rent, crush those that were first to catch falling knives, and increase the reason to walk.
” As if we don’t have enough rental vacancies already..”
Why weren’t the builders paid to stop building? They’ve paid farmers to stop farming. Do we have too many housing units or don’t we?
“As Hays sees it, a shot-in-the-arm for housing would lead to knock-on effect for the broader economy, a spiral-effect that would feed on itself for the better.”
These dummies ignore the overhang from Easy Al’s two-decades long shot in the housing market’s arm, which has resulted in a glut of 6m or so foreclosure homes. Building more houses now would be like handing a recovering alcoholic another bottle of Jack Daniels.
This is a special day on the Blue Skye; The Monarch caterpilar that the first mate brought aboard and fed milkweed leaves is today a butterfly. Watched the wings turn from crumpled tissue to rigid this morning. There haven’t been many of these guys this year. Last year was a devastating season for them. A month from now it will be in Mexico.
Was called Horatio, but turns out to be a Rachael.
Was called Horatio, but turns out to be a Rachael.
Isn’t it just wonderful how Mother-Nature makes everything so clean cut! Nary a mistake!,…nor seldom a mis-interpretation!
“Horatio [tho thou started off a female, but now art male], do you take Rachael to be you lawfully wedded S.O.”?
Fella’s-Y-yee’s all are doomed!, …perhaps:
Future evolution[Relax, it's just scientific..."speculation!" y'all don't have to sign a pledge or anything.]
In the terminal stages of the degeneration of the Y chromosome, other chromosomes increasingly take over genes and functions formerly associated with it. Finally, the Y chromosome disappears entirely, and a new sex-determining system arises.
Primate Y chromosomes, including in humans, have degenerated so much that primates will also evolve new sex determination systems relatively soon, in about 14 million years in humans.
“Satchmo”
What A Wonderful World
Songwriters: Thiele, Robert; Weiss, George David;
I see trees of green, red roses too
I see them bloom, for me and you
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
I see skies of blue, and clouds of white
The bright blessed day, dark sacred night
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
The colors of the rainbow, so pretty in the sky
Are also on the faces, of people going by
I see friends shaking hands, sayin’, “How do you do?”
They’re really sayin’, “I love you”
I hear babies cryin’, I watch them grow
They’ll learn much more, than I’ll ever know
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
Yes, I think to myself
What a wonderful world
Oh yeah
Congratulations! There have been precious few monarchs around these parts this summer. What (or who) was responsible for the devastation in monarch populations last year? Habitat loss/pollution/disease/other?
Bad weather in Mexico over the winter. Too hot or too cold in Quebec two years ago. Milkweed loss to farming, house building and busy roadside maintenance crews.
Now that you mention milkweed, I recall reading about Monsanto (the Evil Company of Dooooom) developing Roundup-ready seeds so farmers could blast all the milkweed out of their fields, leaving the desired crop intact. One side effect was a sharp decline in butterfly populations.
Home Prices Decline 5.9% in Second Quarter- Bloomberg
U.S. home prices fell 5.9 percent in the second quarter from a year earlier, the biggest drop since 2009, as foreclosures added to the inventory of properties for sale, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
European Bank Job ‘Bloodbath’ Surpasses 40,000
bloomberg
Gavin Finch and Liam Vaughan, August 24, 2011
UBS AG (UBSN)’s decision to cut 5 percent of its workforce brings to more than 40,000 the number of jobs cut by European banks in the past month as the region’s worsening sovereign debt crisis crimps trading revenue.
UBS, Switzerland’s biggest bank, said yesterday it will eliminate 3,500 jobs, mainly from its investment bank. It follows HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA), which announced 30,000 cuts on Aug. 1, Barclays Plc (BARC), which is cutting headcount by 3,000, and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (RBS), which is eliminating 2,000 posts. Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN) announced 2,000 reductions on July 28.
European banks are slashing jobs this year six times faster than their U.S. peers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, as concerns about the creditworthiness of Italy, Spain and France roil financial markets and reduce income from fixed- income trading, stock and bond underwriting as well as mergers and acquisitions. Financial firms are also cutting costs as regulators force banks to hold more and better quality capital to withstand future shocks.
“It’s a bloodbath, and I expect things to get worse before they get better,” said Jonathan Evans, chairman of executive- search firm Sammons Associates in London. “I cannot see a lot of those who have lost their jobs getting re-employed. Regardless of how good someone is, no one wants to talk about hiring. Life will be very difficult for two or three years.”
1. A broker who is primarily focused in the northern Central Valley, CA and who has been selling lender REO noted that in the beginning of the mess, he might have several nicer homes in a newer subdivision to sell. Now most of what he has to sell is pretty crummy (75/25 crummy to decent ratio).
2. To my surprise (no, shock), a regional builder called Atherton Homes is selling homes in Manteca at upwards of $150 per square foot.
I thought maybe these were simply listed prices and actual sales were much lower. However, if you look at Zillow, sale prices are pretty high (and there are quite a few of them).
Without the Atherton Homes sales data, I would have shrugged my shoulders at the commentary from the broker. However, the new home sales data was new to me and surprising. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. It won’t take burning through ALL of the shadow inventory to have housing starts increase, just the higher quality stuff. At that point new homes will have generally less competition, as the crummy foreclosures are not really competition for new homes. If someone wants a new home, they want a new home.
Less supply of quality foreclosures and other supply is the only explanation for the Atherton Homes sales.
If you voted for him in ’08 to prove you were not a racist, you have to vote for someone else in ’12 to prove you’re not an idiot. i read this today, and have been chuckling to myself for hours…had to share it.
Sorry, but I just don’t see the Republican party nominating someone that does not accept the holy trinity, that Jesus is the one and only Lamb of God who died on the cross to forgive men of their sins, personal lord and savior… Blah, blah.
Sorry, but I just don’t see the Republican party nominating someone that does not accept the holy trinity, that Jesus is the one and only Lamb of God who died on the cross to forgive men of their sins, personal lord and savior… Blah, blah.
Name 1 democrat or republican president in the last 100 years that did not.
Even Obama has publically said he is Christian and goes to church.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-08-24 15:12:02
Even Obama has publicly said he is Christian and goes to church.
but, but, but, eyes thought the “true” claim was that lil’ Opie was a (Non-Hawaiian) Indonesian-Kenyan Muslim who had love-in sessions with a Satan worshiper?
He looks like one, he talks like one, he smells like one…right slipperybanana?
If you want to see that (all of you reading), then register republican and vote in the primary.
Even if you don’t want to see RP get elected, wouldn’t it be nice to have him in the debates that are aired on prime time? To actually have public debate over the important issues?
You can vote against him come November, but at least get him in the race. I think our country would be much better off if we could just get things that far…
i read this today, and have been chuckling to myself for hours
Hey, eyes like it! really.
This is what is makin’ Hwy chuckle also [actually eyes in “$hock & Awe!”:
They are further arguing that if their advice had been heeded, the intervention in Libya would have been swifter and even more successful!.
heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)
A new era in U.S. foreign policy:
By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
Back in March, many neoconservatives in Washington were extremely dismissive of the way President Obama was handling the intervention in Libya. They argued that he was doing too little and acting too late – that his approach was too multilateral and lacked cohesiveness. They continuously criticized President Obama for, in the words of an anonymous White House advisor, “leading from behind.”
But now that these critics are confronted with the success of the Libya operation, they are changing their tune and claiming paternity of the operation. They are further arguing that if their advice had been heeded, the intervention in Libya would have been swifter and even more successful. But the Libya intervention is so significant precisely because it did not follow the traditional pattern of U.S.-led interventions. Indeed, it launched a new era in U.S. foreign policy.
It is important to emphasize that even though it was a “supporting role,” the U.S. was indispensable to the operation. Nobody else could have eliminated Gadhafi’s air defenses – and, effectively, his air force - within three days. Without America, the operation in Libya could not have taken place. But the U.S. was also “supporting” in the sense that after these initial strikes, it moved into the background and asked its NATO partners to do the heavy lifting. Thereafter, the U.S. intervened only when it felt it needed to. All of this suggests a very different model for intervention, which I believe is a vast improvement over the old, expansive and expensive model.
Looks like our nation’s private employers are getting out of the health insurance business. And I’ll betcha money that Uncle Sam will have to pick up the slack.
Health care reform was not nearly radical enough. Health insurance needs to be cut off from place of work entirely, to free up labor market mobility and support entrenuership.
What you need is for the government to pay for the basics, and individuals to pay for everything else if they can afford it.
I think it should be more that the government pays for catastrophic coverage in case you get cancer or get hit by a dump truck. The basics, you catch a cold, should be covered by you.
Az Silm …Thats the whole idea with Corporate America ,pass that business expense to the government or the employee .
Do you think Corporate America is going to raise salaries to make up for dumping benefits …hell no .
As if the government or the employee is going to be able to afford
covering all the people private industry wants to dump . A breakdown of the long term systems for the benefit of greater profits for the industrial complex . Make the worker pay ,make the
Government pay .
Part of the long term theme and takeover by Corporate America and Wall Street . How dare the American worker expect benefits
from their employer ,or pensions ,or wages that keep up with inflation . Your suppose to work so some billionaire can get more billions and the stock market goes up higher .
As I xplain to Mr. Cole as we head out camping to Utarrr…[driving through Vega$ babeeee!] see those tall radiant ca$ino buildings, that’s where the monie$ game$ are played, x1 person against “the house”…yes, there are winners & losers son, some win more often than others…but as tall as those $parking buildings are, there’s even taller one’s in Manhattan NY, London, Hong Kong,…then our conversation tends to drift to geography & population numbers. :-/
Well like they used to say at Cheney-Halliburton Inc. : “Bidne$$ is Bidne$$!”
Libya rebels announce $1.7 million bounty for Qaddafi
Libya rebel leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil also said that the National Transitional Council would allow Qaddafi safe passage into exile if he relinquished power.
By Kristen Chick, Correspondent / August 24, 2011 / The Christian Science Monitor.
Mustafa Abdel Jalil, leader of the National Transitional Council (NTC) that has been governing rebel territory from Benghazi, announced Tuesday that anyone who kills or captures Mr. Qaddafi will be pardoned for any past crimes, in an attempt to entice one of his inner circle to give him up. The money had been raised by businessmen, he said.
[Talk about your "compassionate conservative" type leaders:]
Mr. Jalil also said that if Qaddafi renounces his claim to power, the NTC would give him safe passage to any country that would accept him for exile. He said the NTC would allow the Libyan leader to go to a nation that is not a member of the International Criminal Court, which has issued a warrant for Qaddafi’s arrest on charges of crimes against humanity – which in practice would allow Qaddafi to escape ICC trial.
You can rationalize all you want, but it won’t protect you from the downside of irrational exuberance.
MarketWatch dot com
The Tell
The Markets News and Analysis Blog
Don’t read too much into gold’s drop
August 24, 2011, 12:25 PM
If gold was actually in a bubble, has that bubble popped? It’s a question some traders are asking today with gold GC1Z dropping by as much as $97 an ounce, or over 5%, but it’s probably safer not to read too much into the metal’s decline.
Kitco Metals analyst Jon Nadler on Tuesday argued that speculators were turning gold into a risky bet, even as other analysts were chiming in with predictions for gold at $2,000 – or even $3,000 an ounce.
But Austin Kiddle, an analyst at London-based bullion brokers Sharps Pixley, said Wednesday that the current downward movement in gold is “more in line with profit taking than a move out of safe-haven territory,” especially given that next month is a big month for gold as the Indian wedding season begins.
“There will still be buying on the dips that should support gold (in some fashion), and we will be lead by some factors in the next few days (U.S. Jobless data and Jackson Hole) which will give a clearer direction on the price of gold,” he said, but “at the moment, it’s watch and wait.”
Cash-strapped Einstein Moomjy files for Chapter 11
August 24, 2011 BY HUGH R. MORLEY The Record
Einstein Moomjy, the 63-year-old rug store with its flagship showroom in Paramus, has filed for bankruptcy re-organization and cut its operations to the bone in the face of plummeting revenue brought on by the housing slump and recession.
The company, started in 1948 by Iranian and German immigrants, has slimmed its workforce from more than three dozen to just a pair of unpaid employees and members of the Moomjy family who run the company’s three stores, in Paramus, North Plainfield and Whippany, the company’s bankruptcy attorney said.
Daniel M. Stolz, the Millburn-based attorney, said Einstein Moomjy hopes that a bankruptcy sale, expected to take place in late September or early October, at the three stores will enable the company to get back on its feet and continue to operate North Plainfield and Whippany stores. The lease on the Paramus store expires in February, he said, and the company does not expect the landlord to extend it.
“There is hope that these sales would raise enough money to keep the creditors happy and allow the Moomjys to continue in business,” Stolz said.
In Chapter 11 bankruptcy papers filed Aug. 19, Einstein Moomjy reported assets of $2.5 million and liabilities of $4.47 million, about half of that for unpaid rent.
“The economy has been killing them,” said Stolz. “They kept hoping that the economy was going to turn around. They kept waiting and waiting for it [business] to pick up, and it just hasn’t been the case.”
Revenue so far this year is about $921,000, compared to $6.65 million in 2010 and $13.35 million in 2009, court papers show.
Chavez nationalise$ gold:
Venezuela / August 25, 2011 / The Sydney Morning Herald
CARACAS. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has signed into law the official nationalisation of the country’s gold mining industry.
He signed the ”natural law that reserves the exploration and management of gold, as well as the connected activities, to the state” at a ministerial meeting broadcast by state media.
During the ceremony, Mr Chavez brandished gold bullion from the Central Bank of Venezuela’s coffers, which holds 154 tonnes of gold, an amount worth $US7.2 billion ($A6.88 billion).
Last week, he announced his intention to nationalise the country’s gold sector in order to stop ”mafias” exploiting Venezuela’s natural resources. Illegal mining makes up 60 per cent of local production in the gold sector.
Obama consults with GE, AMEX execs on job creation
Obama seeks advice from leaders of his jobs council in advance of economics speech August 24, 2011
VINEYARD HAVEN, Mass. (AP) — President Barack Obama is soliciting advice from the co-chairmen of his jobs council on employment boosting initiatives in advance of a major economics address he intends to deliver after Labor Day.
The discussions Wednesday morning with General Electric CEO and chairman Jeffrey Immelt and American Express CEO and chairman Kenneth Chenault focused on increasing engineering graduates and adding construction jobs by making buildings more energy efficient. That from White House spokesman Josh Earnest.
Earnest said the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness will hold meetings Aug. 31 in Portland , Ore., to discuss efforts to add engineers to the workforce. Another meeting Sept. 1 in Dallas will focus on spending on infrastructure projects.
Like the comments the other day, not so gung-ho for the National point-to-point, but cool would be state-to-state, region-to-region destinations. Anywho, CA is a looooong state.
Maybe like Japan we’ll get some kick butt infrastructure out of this. Maybe even a bullet train line or two.
Anyone ever ridden a bullet train? Closest I’ve ever come is Amtrak Acela, which is more like a pullet than a bullet.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pete
2011-08-24 13:22:09
“Anyone ever ridden a bullet train? ”
I’ve been on the TGV in France. This was back in 1990, it was pretty new then. Man, it hauls. There are many routes here in the US where there would be great demand. I just hope that if we do it, we do it right, if that’s not asking too much!
Comment by In Colorado
2011-08-24 14:24:23
I rode the EuroStar once.
Comment by MrBubble
2011-08-24 16:06:46
If you start off an idea/suggestion with how well they do it in Europe, you won’t have a chance of getting it off the ground.
We’re ‘Merukins! We won the war! They put mayonnaise on their freedom fries! Their wimmins got hairy ‘pits!
Comment by Bronco
2011-08-24 16:57:48
Yea, was on a bullet train in China a few months ago— 350kph!!!
If Obama really wants to focus on job creation, he needs to focus on small to mid-sized businesses. Over time, they’ve been net job creators. OTOH, the big corps have been net job destroyers.
He should also consider the impressive growth of what are called non-employer businesses. Those are the one-man and one-woman bands you’ve heard so much about.
True, many of these people are involuntarily self-employed, but they’re still out there. And the numbers are heading up.
Make no mistake ,if Corporate America/Wall Street doesn’t like something ,it wont get passed . In fact anything that gets passed must benefit them /
The job-givers ,who aren’t really giving jobs ,but they are good at
using that as blackmail ploys . Liars
Tell the public they won’t get jobs unless Corporate America gets
the lions share of benefits and tax breaks . than of course they never deliever . Therefore ,tax breaks should only be given based on giving them after a Corporate America actually gives jobs and it can be
determined that they just didn’t fire a bunch of people just to re-hire them to get the tax break . Also more penalty taxes are in order .
You say this isn’t the American way . What is so American way about what Corporate America /Wall Street has been doing lately .
Funny how nobody is demostrating superior performance these
days and it can be rationized that nobody deserves a raise because a Foreigner can replace you .
The way of the past was that Employers gave cost of living increases . It just wasn’t the pattern to give cost of living going up decreases .
you might be getting raises ,because you either work for a
good Company or you truely are a superior employee that is not easy to replace ,even with foreigners
But ,i do agree with you that some income increases should be based on superior performance ,as well as advancements within a Company . Incentive for performance should come into play
no doubt .
A Huge Housing Bargain — but Not for You
By Roger Arnold
NEW YORK (RealMoney) — The largest transfer of wealth from the public to private sector is about to begin. The federal government will be bulk-selling the massive portfolio of foreclosed homes now owned by HUD, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to private investors — vulture funds.
These homes, which are now the property of the U.S. government, the U.S. taxpayer, U.S. citizens collectively, are going to be sold to private investor conglomerates at extraordinarily large discounts to real value.
You and I will not be allowed to participate. These investors will come from the private-equity and hedge-fund community, Goldman Sachs(GS_) and its derivatives, as well as foreign sovereign wealth funds that can bring a billion dollars or more to each transaction.
In the process, these investors will instantaneously become the largest improved real estate owners and landlords in the world. The U.S. taxpayer will get pennies on the dollar for these homes and then be allowed to rent them back at market rates.
On Wednesday, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Treasury Department issued a Request for Information (RFI) concerning the disposition of the inventory of foreclosed homes owned by the federal government.
An RFI is ostensibly a way for the federal government to get input from the private sector on how to accomplish the goals laid out in the request. But that’s really just a facade, as the RFI was structured by the investors to begin with.
In reality, the RFI is a way for the members of Congress to find out if they can get away with bulk-selling these homes to private companies without incurring the wrath of their constituents, taxpayers and former owners of the properties.
Assuming taxpayers don’t push back, the next step will be to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP). The RFP will be the bid and plan for these homes by investors.
The way to keep taxpayers from pushing back is to structure the RFI so that the real intention, the bulk sales, is masked by feel-good goals, such as stabilizing neighborhoods and increasing the supply of rental properties.
As intended, the mass media are playing their part in classic style. Every major newspaper in the U.S. has run articles discussing the plan as a rental conversion, allowing readers to assume that Fannie, Freddie and HUD will be renting the properties directly to families who need housing. And although there is an allowance for these kinds of rentals, it is a minor political facade to the obvious true goal of bulk-sale privatization of these homes.
The investors in this program have been waiting for this opportunity since the portfolio of homes owned by HUD began to spike in 2007, when foreclosures surged first in the “Rust Belt,” principally Ohio and Michigan.
The way to keep taxpayers from pushing back is to structure the RFI so that the real intention, the bulk sales, is masked by feel-good goals, such as stabilizing neighborhoods and increasing the supply of rental properties.
Here in Tucson, we already have a glut of rentals. What are we to do with even more of them?
WATERLOO — A 90-year-old construction company that built many of the buildings of Waterloo’s largest manufacturers and retail centers is closing.
Prairie Construction, the successor to Jens Olesen & Sons Co., one of Waterloo’s oldest construction businesses, is closing effective at the end of next month.
The announcement of the impending closure was made to its employees Friday.
“We had a stockholders meeting Thursday and developed a plan to dissolve the company,” Prairie President Mike Christiason said. “It’s been a pretty difficult economic climate in which to operate for a few years, so we decided this was the best direction for the company.”
Several options were considered.
“It’s a business decision. Not a business failure,” Christiason emphasized. “We will proceed with the work we have under contract and go about closing out the affairs of the company and meeting all the obligations to our clients currently under contract.”
That includes two high-profile downtown Waterloo projects: the Public Market building at the RiverLoop Expo plaza, and Riverfront Renaissance work on the west bank of the Cedar River between US Bank and the Waterloo Center for Arts.
“Most of our projects will be completed by the end of September,” Christiason said, when a company equipment and inventory auction is scheduled.
The company currently employs about 25 people. Prairie officials will do what they can to help them find other work, Christiason said.
Judging from how many of gold’s “worst days” have occurred in the wake of the onset of the financial panic, it seems likely gold has further upside potential from here until the panic eventually subsides.
Marketwatch dot com
Gold’s 10 worst days
August 24, 2011, 11:05 AM
Gold futures are falling sharply Wednesday, with the precious metal losing $86.30, or 4.6%, to trade at $1,775.50 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Analysts said the metal’s failure to top $1,900 an ounce appears to have marked a near term top given gold’s steady rally all year.
Still Wednesday’s sharp decline is a candidate for one of the metal’s worst days ever, in percentage losses.
The 10 worst days for gold, according to data compiled from FactSet Research:
-7.30 6/13/2006
-5.83 3/19/2008
-5.51 8/05/1993
-5.37 5/24/2006
-5.15 12/01/2008
-4.85 10/02/2008
-4.83 10/24/1997
-4.41 2/04/2010
-4.27 10/22/2008
-4.23 8/11/2008
-4.11 10/16/2008
-4.01 12/04/2009
“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth”.
– John Maynard Keynes – The Economic Consequences of the Peace
Ritz Interactive files for Chapter 11
Los Angeles Business from bizjournals
Ritz Interactive , the Irvine-based parent of Internet retailers RitzCamera.com, WolfCamera.com and BoatersWorld.com, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
According to the Orange County Register, the company had $2.4 million in sales in 1999, its first year of operations, and grew to $111 million in sales in 2007. But the company began to experience a revenue downturn in the second half of 2008 due to the U.S. economic recession.
In February 2009, Ritz’ primary supplier at the time, Ritz Camera Centers, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which hurt inventory availability, the Register reported, citing Ritz’ bankruptcy filing last Friday. Then camera manufacturer Canon U.S.A. Inc., whose product historically accounted for more than 15 percent of Ritz’ sales, refused to do business with Ritz after having lost significant funds in connection with the Ritz Camera Centers’ bankruptcy, the filing said.
In addition, Ritz Camera Centers liquidated its Boaters World stores and warehouse, and as a result, the Ritz lost its main supplier for Boatersworld.com, which in 2008 accounted for 13 percent of its sales.
All these factors caused Ritz to report operating losses in 2009, 2010 and year-to-date 2011, according to the filing.
Frivilous economic activity report from your man on the dock: While I was in Canada, there was no sign of any slump in the boating world. I was anchored out most of the time anyway. I’m back on the Erie Canal System and the popular tie up points are empty, empty, empty. Towns like Phoenix and Seneca Falls, which have primo “walls” w/ free electric and stuff…one other boat besides mine at both. These other boats were crewed by folks who’ve been retired for years, so I guess they didn’t get the memo. The wonderful gal who runs the Bridgehouse Brats in Phoenix told me that August has been dead. The weather has been great!
I did see a lot of the fishermen off Oswego trolling, so the meat eaters are still at it.
Odd to note, huge reduction in for sale signs along the way. No new construction since last year.
Henry Blodget vs. Bank of America: “Rotted to the Core”
By Aaron Task | Daily Ticker –
A major controversy has erupted in the blogosphere over the value of Bank of America’s balance sheet, and whether the bank will be forced to raise capital in the near future.
At the center of the debate is my colleague Henry Blodget, who touched off a maelstrom Tuesday with a blog that concluded Bank of America might need to raise up to $200 billion in capital.
“The trouble is that the market doesn’t believe Bank of America’s assets are worth anything close to what Bank of America says they are worth,” Henry writes, citing the following items other observers think should or will be subtracted from the bank’s $222 billion of book value:
$15-$20 billion in Increased mortgage-litigation reserves. Zero Hedge thinks BOFA is understating the liability for mortgage litigation costs by this amount. See explanation here.
Some percentage of $80 billion of “second mortgages.” Yves Smith thinks these should probably be written down by 60%, or $48 billion. You can pick your own number.
Some percentage of $47 billion in commercial real estate loans.* The “extend and pretend” game in commercial real-estate is even more pronounced than in residential real estate. So as Yves Smith observes, there’s almost no chance those loans are actually worth $47 billion. (UPDATE: Our original post said BOFA’s CRE exposure was $182 billion, which was a number cited by Yves Smith. BOFA said this number was off “by a factor of 4.” Yves has since rechecked the filings and realized that she made a mistake. I apologize for relaying it.)
A healthy percentage of $78 billion of “goodwill.” Bank of America built itself by acquisition. “Goodwill” is what’s left over when management overpays for something. As Yves Smith observes, Bank of America’s former CEO Ken Lewis loved overpaying for things. He overpaid for Countrywide, for example, which has since been written off to zero, and Merrill Lynch, which he could have had for free by waiting a couple more days.
Untold amounts of exposure to collapsing European banks and sovereign debt.* Yves Smith says Bank of America says its European exposure is $17 billion. (UPDATE: Bank of America issued a statement clarifying that its “sovereign” exposure–to the debt of PIIGS countries–is $1.7 billion. The overall European exposure is $17 billion. But the big concern here is not just sovereign exposure–debt of countries–but bank exposure. Along with the associated derivatives.) Really? Has the firm not written any credit default swaps protecting customers in the event that European banks or countries go belly up? Might the firm have to post some cash “collateral” to satisfy these contracts? That’s what Lehman had to do, after all. And that’s what made Lehman go from “having plenty of capital” to being broke overnight.
“The market also doesn’t believe that Bank of America has reserved anywhere near enough to pay the costs of litigation surrounding its mortgage behavior during the housing boom,” for which it has already paid $13 billion in settlements, Henry added.
Bank of America’s response was quick and ruthless: “Mr. Blodget is making ‘exaggerated and unwarranted claims’ which is what the SEC stated publicly when he was permanently banned from the securities industry in 2003,” the bank declared.
“The trouble is that the market doesn’t believe Bank of America’s [Insert Company name]:____________ a$$ets are worth anything close to what Bank of America [Insert Company name]:____________ says they are worth,”
Now, we have a foundation for discu$$ion.
(Hwy reaches into misc. bit$ bucket, pulls out a scrap of paper): Toll Bro$
“Some percentage of $80 billion of “second mortgages.” Yves Smith thinks these should probably be written down by 60%, or $48 billion. You can pick your own number.”
“Under-water California Homeowners get some Much Needed Protection from Lenders with the passage of Senate Bill 458
August 22, 2011 - On July 15th, 2011, our Governor of California, Jerry Brown (much easier to spell then our previous Governor) signed Senate Bill 458, also known as SB458 that protects homeowners who are upside down on their homes from any junior lien holders from coming after the homeowner in the event of a short sale.”
So, in many cases BOA is the junior lien holder, Viola!
Sacre Bleu! Wealthy French Push for Higher Taxes, Warren Buffett Smiles
By Aaron Task | Daily Ticker – 3 hours ago
“It’s a sign of just how fast the political-economic climate is changing and also how much underlying social tensions there are, not just in the U.S.,” Tett says. “If there’s going to be a question of finite resources and allocating pain, there could be quite a nasty backlash against the rich.”
The top income tax rate in France is 40% and French citizens pay a 19.6% VAT sales tax, yet some of the country’s wealthiest individuals say they want to pay more.
“At a time when the government is asking everyone to show solidarity, we feel we must contribute,” 16 of the nation’s wealthiest individuals declared in an open letter published on the website of weekly magazine Le Nouvel Observateur.
My realtor was given the option of full-time exclusive agent for a luxury (yes, it’s really freakin’ luxurious) Gulf-front condo building, but he’d have to quit his $43k/yr teaching job.
Steve Jobs resigns as Apple CEO (finally!). Gold drops $100 and latest polls has Perry surging over Obama for 2012.
So long and thanks for all thee fish.
I’d be curious how the Cult of Steve (aka Apple) will do now. I’ve always thought that Apple was a *tad* too dependent on Steve Jobs.
OTOH, it seems to me that, despite all of the bashing that it gets, Microsoft seems to be rolling right along, even though Bill Gates is no longer the top guy.
latest polls has Perry surging over Obama for 2012.
Really?
Polls show Perry with broad lead over Romney [aka, lil' Opie]
August 24th, 2011 / by Martin Wisckol, Politics reporter
How to win friends seniors & Influence voters! by former cheerleader/yell-er Rick Perry
Perry questions constitutionality of Social Security
Sad fact for Republicans: Romney may be electable in a national election, Perry is not. Unless all Americans decide to vote like anti-science Kansans, that is…
Jebster III looks like he is seriously is into barbi-q-ribs & the sauce! Porky’s revenge!
Romeny-Shrub III
Perry-Palin
Bachmann-Coulter
Hwy’s quasi-republican Senator gals in Maine must feel awfully neglected amused.
TRENDING: Jeb Bush: ‘You can’t just be against the president’
By: CNN’s Megan Dougherty
(CNN) - Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush offered advice to 2012 Republican hopefuls: bashing President Barack Obama is not enough to win on the campaign trail.
“I hope that the Republican candidates, when they are offering their solutions, it’s good to be critical of the president, I think the president means well, but his policies have failed,” But just to stop there and say, ‘Well, I’m going to win because I am against what is going on’ is not enough.”
When asked by Fox News Host Neil Cavuto if some in his party overdo their criticism of Obama, Bush said, “I do. I think, when you start ascribing bad motives to the guy, I think that is wrong. It turns off a bunch of people that want solutions.”
You can’t just be against the president,” Bush said.
“I’m neutral in the presidential race, but I’m an admirer of Governor Romney’s,” Bush said, while noting he is looking forward to the unveiling of Romney’s jobs agenda in September.
Ha ha ha ha…the planet has gone topsy-turvey today!
I’m in a good mood, anyway. I was up wasting hand lotion most of the night last night, but I think it is out of my system for now. Looking forward to the big speech in Jackson Hole on Friday.
Glenn Beck boasts ‘courage’ at Israel rally:
By Joe Pompeo | The Cutline 8/24/2011
Israeli religious and political figures both on the left and right came out against the rally, presumably as a reaction to Beck’s track record of controversial remarks. There was even a Facebook page called “Glenn Beck Stay Home” created in protest.
But in the end, 1,700 supporters showed for the sold-out event, and an additional 3,000 gathered at a nearby viewing station where it was beamed in live, a spokesman for Beck told The Cutline. The Guardian, among others, contested those figures, reporting a “surprising number of empty seats belied the organisers’ claims that demand for tickets had outstripped availability.” Many of the attendees were evangelical Christians from the United States, according to reports.
“In Israel, there is more courage in one square mile than in all of Europe,” Beck said in his keynote address. The event, titled “Restoring Courage,” was billed as a rally to declare support for the Jewish state.
“In Israel,” Beck continued, “there is more courage in one soldier than in the combined and cold hearts of every bureaucrat at the United Nations. No country is perfect. But it tries, and it is courageous. Today, the world needs courage more than ever.”
“In Israel, there is more courage in one square mile than in all of Europe,” Beck said in his keynote address. The event, titled “Restoring Courage,” was billed as a rally to declare support for the Jewish state.
It’s also one of the rudest countries on this planet. Seriously, if you’re looking for kindness and hospitality, go to any Arab country.
Completely off topic for the AZ crowd. We live between Surprise and Wickenburg on 2.5 acres in the desert. We have rescue dogs, one of which is a bloodhound found lost in the desert by my wife. A great dog, as this is her property and anything that comes close sets her off. So, this am while getting ready for work I hear her high pitched howl which I heard once before when she located a rattlesnake in the back. Since we have a new puppy, the last thing we need is a snake bite (all the dogs get vaccinated for rattlesnake just in case). Turns out she had targeted a scorpion the size of my fist and was keeping a safe distance while sounding the alert. I am glad she was brought into our life! Besides that, she is just plain cute. Just another day in the desert.
Just wanted to thank everyone who stepped forward to offer their support today. Yes, I know. I made a dumb mistake and bought life insurance that I don’t need. Or want.
I’m going to be seeing my attorney tomorrow afternoon to find out what my legal rights are. So, if you don’t see much verbiage from me tomorrow, it’ll be because I’m getting ready for the attorney meeting — and taking part in it.
BTW, some states have “cold feet” laws that let you get out of a purchase within so many days if you were approached either door-to-door or via phone-solicitation.
I believe some states even have more specific laws regarding insurance–e.g. you have so many days to review the policy after purchase, and you can back out if you don’t likeit.
It totally depends on the state law, but it is worth asking whether your state has any of these sorts of provisions. It may depends on whether they contacted you, or vice-versa.
The CME agrees with my humble opinion that gold has entered a parabolic bubble price blowout phase. Once prices have gone quasi-exponential, watch out below, folks!
For the second time this month, the CME Group Inc., the parent company of the main metals and energy exchanges in the U.S., announced late Wednesday an increase in margin requirements to trade gold. It raised the amount of money needed to trade gold contracts by 27% to $9,450 per 100-ounce contract.
The move comes on the heels of a $104-an-ounce drop in gold futures prices, which some analysts had blamed partly on speculation that the CME would raise margin requirement again.
Gold’s approach to $2,000 an ounce “invited excess speculation and therefore margin concerns for exchanges,” said Richard Hastings, a macro strategist at Global Hunter Securities. “The quasi-exponential price behavior was dangerous and the exchanges today view this with significant concern — and act quickly.”
…
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
Bernanke Impoverishing Grandmothers to Benefit Wall Street Bankers
By James Quinn
08/15/2011
I wonder what goes through Ben Bernanke’s mind as he sits in his gold plated boardroom in the majestic Marriner Eccles building in Washington DC and decides to impoverish grandmothers in order to further enrich Wall Street bankers. He just pledged to keep interest rates at zero percent for two more years. Ben is a supposedly book smart man. Does he have no guilt or shame for what he has wrought? How does he sleep at night knowing he has created bloody revolutions around the globe due to his inflationary zero interest policy? People are dying because he has decided that an elite group of Wall Street bankers who recklessly brought down the worldwide financial system in 2008 deserve to be kept alive and enriched at the expense of the many.
…
“How does he sleep at night knowing he has created bloody revolutions around the globe due to his inflationary zero interest policy?”
The overthrow of some loathsome tyrants is about the only silver lining of Bernanke’s misguided monetarism thus far.
Loathsome?
At one point in our wacky post 9/11 history Gaddafi was considered rehabilitated by more than a few departments of state. Most will recall Libya being elected to chair the UN Human Rights commission in early 2003.
As for Mubarak, most will recall that at least one of our more prolific “allies” in the region considers an Egypt without him a significant source of potential trouble.
So, were they loathsome to their subject peoples? Probably, depending most likely on their status in their respective societies. But both were useful to some degree to both the EU and the US for many decades - until they weren’t.
Less than two years ago, Ghadaffi was seated right next to Barack and Michelle at a fancy dinner in NYC. Now he is Obama’s PE #1. Check back with the Ministy of Truth soon for further updates you need to be made aware of.
be skeerd of the boogeyman!
Only Isreal recievec more Foriegn aid than Egypt.
treason?
We are way beyond “what is right or wrong” at this stage of the economic crisis; either you have power or not. The proverbial “I’ll trade my pistol for your gold coins” transaction comes to mind. Think winners and losers.
Ben is a supposedly book smart man.
I stopped reading as soon as I saw the term “book smart”.
“I stopped reading as soon as I saw the term “book smart”.”
A comment that scores high on the Unintentional Comedy Scale!
Sometimes book lernin’ done gits in the way a’ common sense, sho ’nuff. But bein’ corn-pone and all folksy-like cain’t git a satellite in LEO. Let’s not “go with our guts” on complicated issues and start putting everyone without callouses on their hands up against the wall.
PB …..Everything BB has done has aided the Culprits . Of course its at the expense of the many ,that was the whole idea ,past the pain to the many ,just like take the heist at the expense of the many .
I have been a big hater of BB for a long time and the whole
gang of thieves who like to call the winners and losers .
but Grandma can borrow money cheap to buy a house
that’s all that’s important
except it didn’t work and grandma can’t borrow anything and Wall street can borrow trillions to create bubbles around the world
“Thus God’s will is made plain”
I think I got that quote from Ivanhoe, it showed why lords can kill peasants at will, because God made them lords and God made the others peasants, just like he made fish and pigs all to be used by lords. Fun times ahead in the new dark ages
cactus …it is a reversal to the DARK AGES .
If you kill someone financially ,its like killing the peasant at will .
If you take away opportunty and choices ,its like killing the
peasants at will .
When I think of how many centuries it took for the common man/women to get a decent piece of the pie ,it’s a reversal to
Kings and Lords and slaves and peasants and no opportunity
in the mix .
A couple of days ago the MSM (main shills for Coporate America and Wall Street ) was counseling people on how to
accept having their paycheck cut in half .
You know its all about a psychological problem with not accepting being screwed ,it’s your fault you can’t pay your obligations with half the income .
AUGUST 23, 2011, 3:19 P.M. ET
US Stocks Surge In Final Trading Hour
By Steven Russolillo
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–U.S. stocks registered sharp gains despite another bleak dose of economic data as investors grew increasingly optimistic that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will act later this week to spur economic growth.
…
Bank of America was a notable laggard Tuesday amid a sea of green. The stock dropped 2%, on top of Monday’s 7.9% slide, as analysts worry about the bank potentially needing to raise a significant amount of capital as well as continued mortgage litigation woes. Bank of America shares have tumbled more than 35% this month.
Investors largely overlooked Tuesday’s release of the Richmond Fed’s regional manufacturing survey, which showed economic activity in the central Atlantic region declined sharply in August. The report attracted more attention than usual ahead of its release after dismal readings last week from the New York Fed’s Empire State index and the Philadelphia Fed’s index of manufacturing activity.
Instead, the market remains fixated on Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s scheduled speech in Jackson Hole, Wyo., on Friday. Investors are looking for potential signs of additional measures to stimulate the economy.
The Fed has opened the door to new easing measures, but investors are unclear as to what Bernanke has in store.
“When you have weak reports like we’ve seen from the regional manufacturing surveys, they’re basically giving Bernanke the breathing room to do whatever is necessary to act as a backstop measure for the economy and the markets and keep things from unwinding further,” said Jason Pride, director of investment strategy at Glenmede.
Many analysts say the Fed doesn’t have as much political support to announce a third full-fledged bond-buying program, commonly known as quantitative easing, or QE3.
“I scratch my head in thinking what Bernanke is going to do or say at this point,” said Maury Fertig, chief investment officer at Relative Value Partners. “I’m more concerned that if they put a QE3 in place, what if the market yawns? Then what?”
…
“if they put a QE3 in place, what if the market yawns? ”
I guarantee you the market will yawn, because the effect of QE3 was already priced in, which is why the DOW went up. If Bernanke gets to the podium and says “I got nuthin’,” then the market should lose the 400 or so points of anticipation gains.
Buying the dip is just a another word for counting your chickens before they’ve hatched.
buy on the rumor sell on the news kind of thing
sell now the news will be lame as you mentioned above
Aug. 24, 2011, 12:01 a.m. EDT
How to get ready for a double-dip recession
By Robert Powell, MarketWatch
BOSTON (MarketWatch) — It’s not a recession yet. Neither comprehensive data for July nor the more spotty data for August confirm this, according to David Kelly, chief market strategist for J.P. Morgan Funds.
But saying it’s so will probably make it so. “Overall, the chorus of economists and strategists predicting recession has grown louder in recent days and the withering impact of these pronouncements on confidence is sadly boosting the chances that they could be right,” Kelly just wrote in his weekly commentary.
Sam Stovall, the chief investment strategies for Standard & Poor’s Equity Research, is also among those who are preparing for the worst. “If the market action in 2008 taught us anything, it was: Be proactive and expect the worst,” Stovall wrote in his weekly commentary.
…
“But saying it’s so will probably make it so.”
That’s how flimsy our economy is?
“Be proactive”
Executive: We at the network want a dog with attitude. He’s edgy, he’s in your face. You’ve heard the expression “let’s get busy”? Well, this is a dog who gets biz-zay! Consistently and thoroughly.
Krusty the Clown: So he’s proactive, huh?
Executive: Oh, God, yes. We’re talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.
Meyers: Excuse me, but proactive and paradigm? Aren’t these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I’m accusing you of anything like that. I’m fired, aren’t I?
Executive: Oh, yes.
lovely!
“withering impact of these pronouncements on confidence “
So it’s a confidence game.
Want To Know Wall Street’s Dirty Little Secret?
Aug. 22, 2011
WSJ Money & Investing Editor Francesco Guerrera stops by Mean Street and tells the story of Wall Street’s dirty little secret: traders don’t always follow the advice they give to their customers. AP Photo/Petr David Josek
Tankxs Mr. Bear, eyes just poured my 1st cup of joe…
tells the story of Wall Street’s dirty little secret: traders don’t always follow the advice they give to their customers.
Ho ho, hah hah, hehehehehehe, BwaHaHaAhHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! (Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower™)
To answer drummnj’s question of yesterday more seriously than my “hunch-based” answer of yesterday, suppose there was a cartel of G-7 central bankers who could either protect individual investors in gold or could protect money center banks (not to mention themselves) which are heavily invested in fiat currencies. Which group do you think their policies would be designed to protect during the duration of a financial panic?
Aug. 23, 2011, 10:08 p.m. EDT
China’s gilded gold market
Much of the growing gold demand has been driven by individuals
By Fu Tao and Sun Yanxia
BEIJING ( Caixin Online ) — At 350 tons per year, China is the world’s largest producer of gold. And yet China’s statistics show that the country has been a net gold importer since the 1990s. Gold imports and exports have been tightly controlled by the People’s Bank of China, though new avenues for investment have emerged in recent years.
Marcus Grubb, the managing director of investment research and marketing for the World Gold Council (WGC), in June said that the world gold price had yet to fully internalize the additional demand that China’s investors and consumers were bringing to the table.
At the time, the WGC had just published figures that showed China’s demand for gold surpassing that of India for the first time. This has led many to ask where China’s gold market is headed next and to wonder how China’s expanding gold imports might apply upward pressure to global gold prices.
Silence golden at PBOC
One gold investor joked: “If the central bank were to signal that it was going to buy gold, the price would reach $2,000 overnight.”
…
Gold Bubble is bursting. It is down almost $100. Looks like the speculators got the memo that BB is not doing QE3.
Gold market is in a correction. Not surprising after the run it has had. I do like palladium more than gold right now but the increase in gold has not ended and will not end until all the broke azz nations have inflated away their debts. It is harder to do QE when gold is at a record price so I expected the fiat powers to manipulate it lower in the short term. In the longer term Chidia physical buying will drive it up.
Chindia would buy it when they have money to buy it. At least India has 90% debt to GDP ratio and is on the verge of being downgraded unlike US. China may have our dollars but they will buy our bonds to keep their exchange rate fixed. Moreover, with the commodities bubble collapsing, China is here for very hard times ahead. It will take down Australia also.
RE bubble in BRIC countries may burst this year which will also include Canada, Australia, Singapore, Israel etc., provided there is no more money printing by central banks especially BB.
It will take down Australia also.
Hwy & Family is anxiously looking forward to sailing / long train rides and x3 cheers to the wonderful Aussie peoples, places & beers!
Martin, while I have been in the camp of a China slowdown for sometime, I do not see how or why they would slow below 8% growth. They have more than enough dollars saved to have a robust stimulus. India still has room to grow and high tech companies are still locating over there. Until the gap between wages closes more I can’t see either one of them going into a recession. Now, it is true even China is using more robots since wages have been going up, they still have a sufficient labor pool for another decade of growth.
I particularly do not understand this statement:
“Moreover, with the commodities bubble collapsing, China is here for very hard times ahead. It will take down Australia also.”
Since China is a major importer of commodities it would gain from a sharp drop in commodities. I actually do not see that happening but it would be good for them not bad. Australia it would be bad for but don’t confuse a reaction to peak production with a bubble.
See my post below; it’s had lots of 4%+ corrections since 2008. Not sure this is the onset of the big one…
Fallout from the Fed’s secret $1.2 trillion bank bailout
August 23, 2011, 12:12 PM
By Kurt Brouwer
Did you know the Federal Reserve secretly loaned up to as much as $1.2 trillion to U.S. and foreign banks? This information has now been released and we even know the institutions that got the bulk of the funds. Can you say, Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC). Due to the inflammatory nature of this information, the Fed has been reluctant to share it with Americans, but now it has now come out due to a lengthy Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) investigation by Bloomberg.
…
Geez, ALL them thar loan$ seem to have been DI$TRIBUTED Before Jan 20th 2009? Is that right Professor Bear?
Stop that! Don’t you know that Everything Is Obama’s Fault?(TM)
Clinton taught us that it goes with the job.
i was telling you guys years ago that BB was lending all the cuprits mucho bucks without proper reserves or backing for those loans .
What better way to be in a blackmailed position but to give entities
loans and thereafter you have to do their bidding or they will default .
BB just fell right into their trap because hes a jerk .
Its like giving a insolvent FB a new loan and than your stuck shoring them up forever.
The culprits blew it ,they should of gone BK . The casino games of
the shadow world of banking should of been busted and altered
from corruption ,rigged decks and stacked decks and faulty leverage . Its outlandish and absurd . Shore up the corrupted is the theme song .
About that 1.2 Trillion; last month they told us the GOA discovered 16 Trillion in such loans. So which is it?
I have estimate the amount to be about 10 trillion ,but that’s just my estimate ,it might be more .
BB forced into shoring them up so they can pay back loans ,but some of it is just being transferred to taxpayers obligation .
Let’s see BOA gets $100B and buys out Countrywide.
JP Morgan Chase gets 100B and buys out WaMu
Citigroup gets 100 B and buys Wachovia
Somebody help me out here….
What’s really sad about those buyouts is that we on the HBB could see that things weren’t going to end well.
Imagine that. A buncha housing bubble bloggers getting it right.
Citigroup didn’t buy Wachovia, Wells Fargo bought Wachovia. Citigroup couldn’t afford to buy anybody even with an extra $100B.
Thanks, Max. I forgot they got torpedoed in favor of WFC after the “deal” was announced.
Housing bust leads to broken dreams, outrage
Aug 22, 2011
This editorial is being reprinted from the Detroit Free Press, where it was first published.
The horror of the nation’s housing bust has left a trail of broken dreams — and of outrage, much of which must now be directed at the government agencies ostensibly seeking to help distressed homeowners while simultaneously pushing many of them out the door.
But as an investigation by the Detroit Free Press showed, a big contributor to the horror has been Fannie Mae, the quasi-private mortgage giant that was bailed out by the federal government, in part to help salve housing woes.
The federal regulator who oversees Fannie Mae needs to act swiftly and decisively to stop the institution’s dissembling, and force it to keep more people in their homes, as federal housing programs and Fannie Mae’s own public statements demand.
While Fannie Mae publicly touted its efforts to keep people in their homes, it was privately telling banks to foreclose on a specific percentage of delinquent mortgage holders.
Fannie Mae also engages in outright lying: Promises not to foreclose on anyone who was still in the modification process were repeatedly broken.
From the outside looking in, it is difficult to assess how much of this is incompetence and how much is purposeful misrepresentation. From the top, where the Obama administration has seemed to sincerely want to help people stay in their homes, it must feel like pushing on a string.
…
Consumer Negativity on Housing Continues
By David Morrison
The market for U.S. housing continues to be smothered by the weight of troubled real estate loans and choked on low consumer expectations of being able to get a home loan, according to a recent survey from Fannie Mae.
The now government-owned mortgage giant reported that its quarterly survey of consumer sentiment, the National Housing Survey, found that 26% of survey respondents reported being underwater on their current mortgage loans – owing more on the loan than the property is worth – an increase of 3% from the first-quarter survey.
Further the survey found that homeowners who reported being underwater on their mortgages, even if they were current on the loans, experienced greater degrees of stress about their finances and their debts.
Perhaps the biggest challenge for credit union mortgage marketers, fully 53% of the consumers surveyed said that it would be very difficult for them to get a mortgage today and that percentage climbed to 71% among renters.
“Consumers are more cautious due to concerns over employment and household finances,” said Doug Duncan, vice president and chief economist of Fannie Mae. “As a result, consumer spending, which accounts for about 70% of the economy, ground to a halt in the second quarter. Consumers are more hesitant to take on additional financial commitments, and a setback to confidence means a setback to the recovery of the housing market.”
…
While the ivory tower and DC wonks may perceive deflation, J6P on main street is living in a Stagflationary Depression.
See also the Misery Index as computed using U6 unemployment and non-fake CPI that actually reflects the increased prices of food, energy, health care, education, et cetera.
“While the ivory tower and DC wonks may perceive deflation, J6P on main street is living in a Stagflationary Depression.”
Must be regional. Sure doesn’t seem to be taking hold around these parts. Quite baffling.
Consumers are more hesitant to take on additional financial commitments, and a setback to confidence means a setback to the recovery of the housing market.”
stupid consumers don’t they know this will cause a recession
at least Toll brothers profits are up
AUGUST 22, 2011, 10:31 A.M. ET
Fannie Mae Cuts Economic Growth Outlooks For 2011, 2012
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
Fannie Mae (FNMA) cut its economic growth outlook for this year and next, while also predicting the probability of another recession is “close to a coin toss.”
The mortgage giant said it expects 1.4% growth this year, down from last month’s estimate of 2.4%. Meanwhile, for 2012, it predicted growth of 2%, down from its July forecast of 3.1%.
“Key factors, including revisions to gross domestic product data, have revealed that we have a bigger hole to dig out of, which explains the consumer angst over the lack of employment growth,” said Fannie Mae Chief Economist Doug Duncan.
Fannie also said housing activity, with the exception of the rental housing market, is expected to weaken along with the overall economy due to a renewed decline in business and consumer confidence and a softening hiring trend. The rental vacancy rate declined to 9.2% in the second quarter, the lowest rate in nine years, which Fannie said is consistent with a declining home-ownership rate and suggests a rising number of households have shifted to renting over owning.
Why does Uncle Sam insist on attaching strings to its bulk home sales? Couldn’t they actually sell those taxpayer-owned homes for more if they just offered them to the highest bidder, sans strings? (This is an application of Le’Chatelier’s principle, for anyone who cares.)
Feds want foreclosures sold in bulk to be rentals
by Catherine Reagor, The Arizona Republic - Aug. 23, 2011 05:03 PM
The federal government would like to sell some of its huge portfolio of foreclosure homes to investors who will rent them out.
These are houses with loans backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration that lenders and investors have foreclosed on and handed back to these federally owned agencies to take the losses on.
Last week, the U.S. Treasury Department and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requested proposals from groups to buy the homes and turn them into rentals. The federal agencies didn’t mention a discount for buying the houses in bulk, but most investors will expect one.
The federal agencies say they want to pool the homes in portfolios, because the houses are selling too slowly on an individual basis.
What happened to the federal housing plan to help people modify their mortgages and keep their homes instead of losing them to foreclosure? An investor renting out the property likely will pay much less than what was owed on the mortgage.
…
It would make me somewhat nervous as a small landlord to think that the big boyz were about to get lots of cheap houses to rent out.
My prediction is the bulk sales will be focused on crappier houses in bad neighborhoods that the gov is probably holding in large amounts (eg vinyl sided subdivisions in the middle of nowhere, or streets of crappy houses in the hood). I doubt it would include their inventory of nicer houses in better hoods. I bet they can get more at individual auction for those than by discounting and selling en masse as rentals- except in some areas perhaps.
Assuming the government is hoping to attract some serious private capital to this venture, then only making the worst of the houses available for purchase will kill the program. Private investors will refuse to participate if they suspect that the nicer inventory will become available later.
Sounds like HUD Homes. In these parts, “HUD Homes” are synonymous with the word “dumps.”
Polly, it sounds as if the nicer inventory won’t be available at all — at least not in bulk.
And I’m guessing that the proposal is for somebody to buy the homes and rent them out to the FB who is still living there. Didn’t HBB think of a scenario just like that a few years ago? It’s a good way to bring in cash from the sidelines while “keeping people in their homes” at the same time, and you can do it by computer. It’s a win-win — unless, of course, you’re an individual renter, like most of HBB.
“Polly, it sounds as if the nicer inventory won’t be available at all — at least not in bulk.”
Not yet.
I haven’t heard that the proposal is to rent to the people in place. I’ve heard that from economists/commentators, but they were talking about Fannie/Freddie doing it directly, not private investors. Selling to private investors and then severly restricting what they do with the property they now own is a good way to make a program dead on arrival. People don’t put capital at risk for that.
Not to mention, investors that I know largely refuse to rent a house back to an FB. “If they fell behind before, what makes you think they’ll pay me?”
Granted, if you can get a place cheaply enough for cash flow with the rent, it might make sense. But most experienced investors want to pick their own tenant.
Granted, if you can get a place cheaply enough for cash flow with the rent, it might make sense. But most experienced investors want to pick their own tenant.
Every investor I’ve known has chosen his/her tenants. And some of them are pretty darn picky.
We live in a nice area of So Ca, and the F&F homes on their websites are usually overpriced substandard REO’s. You’re right Alpha, they aren’t in desirable hoods.
We’re actually looking in white & blue collar mix NICE neighborhoods, and the homes on F&F’s REO websites never work for us.
And I’m soooooo sure these will be added to the comps for the area, right?
I note the recent rate of U.S. new home sales per capita is far worse than it was back in 1963, when the U.S. population was only 188m, compared to its present level near 309m.
Posted on Wed, Aug. 24, 2011
New-home sales fall again, on pace for worst year since ‘63
By Derek Kravitz
Associated Press
WASHINGTON - Sales of new homes fell in July for the third straight month, the government reported Tuesday in a sign that housing remains a drag on the economy.
If the current pace continues, 2011 would be the worst year for new-home sales in nearly half a century.
Sales fell nearly 1 percent in July to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 298,000, the Commerce Department said. That’s less than half the 700,000 sales that economists say represent a healthy market.
Last year, 323,000 homes were sold, the worst year on records that go back to 1963.
While new homes represent less than one-fifth of the housing market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs and $90,000 in taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
High unemployment, larger required down payments, and tougher lending standards are preventing many people from buying homes.
Plunging stocks and a growing fear that the United States could tip back into another recession also are keeping people from entering the housing market.
A slowdown in the U.S. economy has more than offset any boost from super-low mortgage rates, said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.
“A new home is a luxury that many Americans can no longer afford,” Dales said.
…
Who needs new homes when we have so many existing homes?
For the foreseeable future, new home construction will be driven solely by ego trips for the rich, the need to replace housing lost demolition and abandonment, and localized shortages (NY, SF).
And the new housing units due to replacement and localized shortages will be smaller and less opulent than in the bubble.
This isn’t just due to excess supply. Rising materials prices (business cycle adjusted) relative to average American’s income will make existing buildings more valuable, at least in places that are not in the midst of social and economic collapse.
‘No upside momentum’ with housing
06:43 PM PDT on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
BY TIMOTHY R. HOMAN
BLOOMBERG NEWS
Sales of new U.S. homes declined more than projected in July to the lowest level in five months, indicating the industry is struggling to stabilize two years into the economic recovery.
Purchases fell 0.7 percent to a 298,000 annual pace after a 300,000 rate in June that was slower than previously estimated, figures from the Commerce Department showed Tuesday in Washington. The median projection in a Bloomberg News survey of economists called for a 310,000 rate in July.
Builders are less inclined to start new projects as they face competition from cheaper existing homes and the prospect of foreclosures putting more unsold properties on the market.
Yeah, I’m more interested in the existing homes number these days. New homes tend to be built in new communities further from city centers, opposite to the current trend of where people are moving, big city or small.
Existing homes are more representative of what’s happening in the overall market.
The rise in U.S. new home sales during Greenspan’s tenure at the Fed to well above their historic range and their subsequent collapse to 50-year lows in the aftermath is readily apparent from a glance at the chart for new U.S. home sales back to 1963, which is included in the article linked below. Perhaps the Housing Bubble should be rechristened the Greenspan Bubble?
I am quite certain that you could find many economists at the Fed who would be able to hold up their end of a conversation about the importance of obeying the economy’s natural speed limit. For instance, you can’t invest in residential housing at rates forever above the growth rate of the population without later suffering a day of reckoning.
New Home Sales Drop Again
Dirk van Dijk, CFA
August 23, 2011
New Home Sales in July fell 0.7% from June, to a rate of 298,000. Relative to a year ago, sales are up 6.8%. While the year-over-year rebound is more than welcome, it is still a very dismal rate of New Home sales.
Also, there was a downward revision to the June numbers of 12,000 to 300,000. Thus, relative to where we thought we were, it could be seen as a 4.5% decrease. The July level was worse than the expected rate of 310,000.
The 15 lowest months on record (back to 1963) for new home sales have all been in the last 15 months. New home sales have only exceeded the 400,000 level three times since September of 2008 when the financial markets collapsed. The most recent time was in April 2010, as sales were inflated by the rush to get in under the wire and collect the homebuyer tax credit. Sales collapsed after that, and July comp is thus an easy one.
Relative to the peak of the housing bubble (7/05, 1.389 million), new home sales are down 78.5%. Prior to September 2008, there had only been 20 months in which new home sales were below the 400,000 level, with the most recent being in 1982. The graph below shows the history of new homes sales (blue, left scale) along with the growth in population (red, right scale), since presumably if you have more people, you will need more places for them to live.
Take a very close look at the relationship between new home sales and the grey recession bars. New home sales fall sharply before all recessions (with the exception of the dot.com bust-caused recession of 2001) and then start to increase sharply in the middle of, or towards the end of, the recession. That clearly is not happening this time around.
If you want to know why the recovery has been anemic so far, look no further than the graph above! New home sales are vital to the overall economy. If new homes are not selling, then homebuilders have no reason to build more of them. After all, that is very expensive inventory to sit on.
…
New home sales have only exceeded the 400,000 level three times since September of 2008 when the financial markets collapsed.
Jan 2009 - Aug 2011 = 32 months -3 = <400,000 x 29 months
How’s my math this morning Prof?
What happens just after a T$unami?
Cheney-Shrub Shadow Legacy Effect #3: “We left y’all with the worst POS economy in 80 years…see ya!“
Toll brothers report of higher profits:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Toll-Brothers-3Q-net-income-apf-1282396128.html?x=0
Markets await words from Fed’s Bernanke
By Heidi Moore
Marketplace, Monday, August 22, 2011
A year after the Federal Reserve chairman primed stocks with plans to buy up bonds, investors await a key speech for signs of another big move
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
BOB MOON: Aside from Libya, of course, we still have our own problems at home — mainly, the economy. We had a recovery that felt like it wasn’t. Now, several Wall Street economists say we’re staring another potential recession in the face. What to do? Experts are divided: Should we try more federal spending to stimulate the economy, or just stop the government meddling and let it grow on its own?
Later this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will signal what, if anything, the central bank will try to do to make everyone happy. Our New York bureau chief Heidi Moore reports.
HEIDI MOORE: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has picked up several nicknames: Big Ben, The Bearded One.
Quincy Krosby is a strategist for Prudential Financial, and she likes another nickname.
QUINCY KROSBY: Ben Bernanke has become the “Market Whisperer,” if you will. When he speaks, the market listens.
The markets will be listening when Bernanke speaks at a gathering of economists later this week. And what do they want to hear?
PETER BOOCKVAR: If you’re in the market, you want to hear Bernanke throw more money from the sky. You want him to do something to save you.
…
“You want him to do something to save you.”
Looks like there’s a fine line between desperation and confidence nowadays.
“Desperation is a stinky cologne”
“You want him to do something to save you.”
Wait, I thought these guys were all homespun and bootstrapped and the party of personal resposibility and masters of their own Randian destiny and they don’t need a nanny state oh no precious, and now they want Bernanke to SAVE THEM?????
Like this classic:
“How about this, (Mr.) President and new administration — Why don’t you put up a web site to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages, or would we like to, at least, buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people who might have a chance to actually prosper down the road, and reward people that could carry the water, instead of drink(ing) the water…We’re thinking of having a Chicago Tea Party in July. All you capitalists that want to show up to Lake Michigan, I’m going to start organizing.”
— Rick Santelli’s epic rant, February 2009.
“Wait, I thought these guys were all homespun and bootstrapped…”
I think that IS what they want done (ie - no more QE).
Trouble is, as I mentioned yesterday, are they prepared for the fallout and are they prepared to give praise for doing the right thing?
Or will they continue to whine about jobs, economy, worst President ever, etc.
I guess all I can do now is sit on the edge of my seat and try and contain myself while I wait for “The Bernanke” to pull another rabbit out of a hat. I’ll be sure not to miss out on this magical event.
From “Sir Greenspan” to “Bernanke The Magnificant”
Visual:
http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/83138/83138,1278357505,5/stock-photo-a-happy-cartoon-magician-pulling-a-rabbit-out-of-his-hat-56577118.jpg
That image reminds me of Bullwinkle:
“Watch me pull a rabbit out of this hat”
[Pulls a lion, lion roars]
“Oops, wrong hat”
“Whata we do now Rocky?”
Bailout Update - $1.5 Trillion Still Owed To Treasury, Fed
Source - PR Watch
A new study released today by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) shows that, despite rosy statements about the bailout’s impending successful conclusion from federal government officials, $1.5 trillion of the $4.8 trillion in federal bailout funds are still outstanding.
The analysis, presented in charts and an online table and program profiles, is based entirely on government records. This comprehensive assessment of the bailout goes beyond the relatively small Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) program to look at the rest of the Treasury and Federal Reserve’s multi-trillion dollar response to the financial crisis. It shows that while the TARP bailout of Wall Street (not including the bailout of the auto industry) amounted to $330 billion, the government also quietly spent $4.4 trillion more in efforts to stave off the collapse of the financial and mortgage lending sectors. The majority of these funds ($3.9 trillion) came from the Federal Reserve, which undertook the actions citing an obscure section of its charter.
“In order to understand the big picture on the bailout, you have to look beyond TARP and examine the trillions the Federal Reserve has disbursed to keep the big banks above water. $4.8 trillion went out the door to aid financial companies and repair the damage they caused to financial markets, and $1.5 trillion of that is still outstanding,” said Mary Bottari, director of CMD’s Real Economy Project.
Most of the bailout funds were comprised of aid to banks – the peak outstanding amount was $2.2 trillion in January 2009 – which took place at the height of the financial crisis in the form of loans with below-market interest rates and for questionable collateral to banks directly from the Treasury and Federal Reserve.Outstanding Bank Support vs. Mortgage Lending Support - July 2011 - In Billions
Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchases
CMD’s study also shows how the government is continuing to prop up the same banks that caused the crisis in its attempt to help the housing market. The government’s housing program – which peaked at $1.6 trillion outstanding in July 2010 – is aimed at keeping mortgage lending flowing by subsidizing deals Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac make with the banks. Treasury and the Federal Reserve’s main approach has been to buy more than a trillion dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so that the two government-sponsored enterprises can continue to purchase and bundle mortgages from the banks, which they sell to Fannie and Freddie at a profit. The banks also benefit from the hundreds of billions in direct loans the government has made to Fannie and Freddie, which the GSEs then turn around and make in insurance pay-outs to banks for mortgages that have gone bad.
This massive effort is in stark contrast to the mere $2 billion the Treasury has spent to directly help homeowners stay in their homes via the widely criticized Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) program. With housing prices continuing to falter and the United States approaching 9.2 million foreclosure filings since the beginning of 2008, HAMP can be described as nothing less than an abject failure.
“The Federal Reserve and the Treasury have spent $1.6 trillion in a bank-shot to save the mortgage lending market by using the same financial companies that got us into this mess,” said Conor Kenny, lead author of the study. “That’s more than 800 times what they’ve spent directly to keep homeowners in their houses, and the banks have made money off the whole thing.”
CMD’s analysis also shows how the $4.8 trillion bailout of the financial sector dwarfs the $600 billion that the Federal Reserve spent on the much-hyped “Quantitative Easing 2″ of 2010-2011 that was intended to help the broader economy – not just the financial sector – by lowering interest rates across the board and preventing deflation.
“$1.5 Trillion Still Owed To Treasury, Fed”
Ha ha ho ho he he he he he…
Make no mistake ,more than that is owed ,make no mistake ,more than that was dumped onto other balance sheets at the expense of
the taxpayers /
The accounting is bogus . I estimate about 7 trillion is more like it
or even more .
If you actually put a price tag on the real bail out ,if you conducted a analysis of all the ways the bail outs took their form ,
it would be a staggering amount .
Buttonwood
Forty years on
An anniversary for the currency markets
Aug 13th 2011 | from the print edition
FORGET Watergate. For economic historians, Richard Nixon’s place in history is secure. He was the president who, 40 years ago, severed the link between global currencies and gold and ended the fixed-exchange-rate system.
Under the Bretton Woods regime, world currencies were pegged to the dollar, which in turn was tied to a set price of gold. Central banks had the right to convert their dollar holdings into bullion. But on August 15th 1971 Nixon, in the face of economic difficulties, closed the gold window, devalued the dollar against bullion and imposed a 10% surcharge on imports. The era of paper money and floating exchange rates had arrived.
…
… there were no asset bubbles to speak of in the Bretton Woods era and (not coincidentally) scarcely any financial crises. Between 1945 and 1971, the worst calendar-year loss suffered on Wall Street was a 14.1% decline in 1957.
Perhaps the lesson of the past 40 years is that neither a fixed nor a floating-rate system is a panacea. Many governments have used currency pegs as a shortcut towards economic credibility without the structural reforms needed to ensure their economies remained competitive. Floating rates create the temptation for governments to drive down their currencies and grab a bigger share of world trade. That temptation is very strong at the moment and could lead to further political tensions if America opts for another round of quantitative easing. In a world of competing devaluations, gold keeps driving higher. It surged above $1,800 an ounce on August 11th. In terms of the old gold measure, the dollar has devalued by 98% since the end of the Bretton Woods era.
Financial markets
Hit me baby one more time
Markets will take any help they can get
Aug 13th 2011
ADDICTS always crave one more hit. With stockmarkets slumping over the past two weeks investors hoped that the Federal Reserve would unveil a third round of “quantitative easing” (QE), the creation of money to bolster asset prices, on August 9th. The second round, announced in August last year, had triggered an equity rally in late 2010.
Instead of pure heroin, investors got methadone in the form of a commitment from the Fed to keep rates at their current low levels for another two years. While Wall Street managed a late rally on the day (the Dow gained almost 430 points, or 4%), the Fed’s hit gave only a brief rush. Share prices resumed their fall on August 10th.
There was a more sustained reaction to the actions of the European Central Bank, which started buying Italian and Spanish government bonds on August 8th. Though the size of the buying programme was unknown, the effect on the bond markets was dramatic. The Spanish ten-year yield fell from more than 6% to 5% within two days.
At least the central banks are having a positive effect, however temporary. Politicians, meanwhile, have left investors with serious doubts about their ability to handle the crisis. European leaders have moved from an initial stance of denial about the seriousness of the region’s debt problems through a series of sticking-plaster solutions as the rot spread. American leaders, for their part, flirted with the prospect of a default before reaching a deal that neither helped the economy in the short term nor did enough to improve the government’s finances in the long term.
…
Realtors Are Liars®
The earthquake is barely gone and now a hurricane’s a comin’.
I guess today should be emergency preparedness day… I check my food storage every three months or so, so I think I’m good. I doubt they’ll evacuate anyone, but I think I’ll take a trip to the store and the gas station just in case.
See also “The Long Emergency” by James Howard Kunstler
“Kunstler”, the #1 “I am not a doomer” Doomer. Every event that happens around the world he tries to tie into his predictions and/or rants.
His 1993 book “The Geography of Nowhere” accurately predicted the Epic Fail of the auto-dependant exurban model of infinite growth.
How’s that working out now in the Inland Empire, Palm Beach County, Queen Creek AZ, and the other Sunbelt drive-til-you-qualify locales?
Queen Creek and the Inland Empire are suffering because they were major hot spots of the housing bubble. If the book predicted problems in places like that due to high gasoline prices, it didn’t predict anything that has happened.
To this point, the housing collapse had nothing to do with “Peak Oil”. It may happen, so may many ugly things. The housing collapse was pure speculation and fraud.
Also, during the next Depression, Kunstler believes everyone down South will pack up and want to move to upstate New York. I really doubt that will happen. I was raised in Florida without A/C, you can live without it if you have the right kind of house. However, you cannot exist in Troy, NY without power or food shipped in from warmer climes.
The only signs I see of the coming carpocalypse is fewer Hummers on the road.
“However, you cannot exist in Troy, NY without power or food shipped in from warmer climes.”
Well, they did it 150 years ago. But I don’t think you could do it with today’s population; we’d go through wood far too fast.
“However, you cannot exist in Troy, NY without power or food shipped in from warmer climes.”
Troy was first settled in 1787 and became a city in 1816. Miami was first settled in 1825 and incorporated in 1896.
Eskimos and Laplanders survived in harsher climates than Troy, NY.
Of course all of that is true. However, my point was that given a world without fossil fuels, I would much rather live in a warm climate. As I stated, I have lived without A/C and it is tolerable; but not preferable. That said, any rural people will weather the withdrawl of modernity better than urbanites.
Have you guys ever been to Troy, NY? You don’t want to subsist there…. hell…. you don’t want to thrive there.
Get out fast.
Beat the crowd. The rush will be on Saturday morning.
Hurricanes and earthquakes are really nothing. The biggest dangers arise when Congress is in session.
I was in Costco yesterday and went passed the emergency food rations in a pail. Dehydrated vegetarian meals just do not appeal to me if the civilized world is really ending on December 21, 2012. I went for the spam. It has a shelf life of many years. Don’t eat the stuff usually but I will admit to liking it. I figure that I will go out drinking red wine and eating spam.
Ah, there’s nothing like a Spam & Velveeta sandwich with Miracle Whip dressing. Round out this culinary selection with a tall glass of Kool-Aid and two Twinkies.
I didn’t say it was good, I just said there was nothing like it.
At least it won’t be hard to id the contents of your stomach if anyone is around to do an autopsy.
LOL, Cracker Bob. I cringed just reading it….
I bought a can of Spam for my emergency pantry. I have no intention of ever opening it. I just bought it for cultural and mathematical completeness.
Wall Street is waiting with baited breath for BB’s rescue plan. With such widespread anticipation of a QE3 announcement this Friday, it is hard to conceive how the Fed could surprise to the upside.
Index Futures:
S&P 500 1,152.25 -6.25 -0.54%
DOW 11,078 -63.00 -0.57%
NASDAQ 2,112 -12.25 -0.58%
Aug. 24, 2011, 6:12 a.m. EDT
U.S. stock futures drop ahead of data
Bernanke’s Jackson Hole appearance remains main event
By William L. Watts, MarketWatch
FRANKFURT (MarketWatch) — U.S. stock futures fell Wednesday, pointing to a lower open for Wall Street after two days of gains as investors awaited data on demand for durable goods and Friday’s speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.
Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJ1U -0.63%) dropped 76 points to 11,065. Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures (SP1U -0.57%) declined 8.3 points to 1,150.30, while Nasdaq 100 futures (ND1U -0.56%) fell 14 points to 2,110.
“I think the market is in a wait-and-see mode” as investors weigh prospects the Fed chairman will signal readiness to delve further into the central bank’s tool box to deliver monetary stimulus, said Steen Jakobsen, chief economist at Saxo Bank.
Bernanke is set to address an annual gathering of international central bankers and economists in Jackson Hole, Wyo., on Friday.
Gains by U.S. equities on Monday and Tuesday after a four-week global rout were tied in part to speculation Bernanke would use the speech to signal the Fed would take additional actions, including possibly a third round of quantitative easing, or QE3, to counteract a flagging economy.
Bernanke used last year’s Jackson Hole speech to lay the groundwork for operations known as QE2, helping to trigger a months-long rally in equities.
Jakobsen, however, said surveys indicate expectations Bernanke will commit to further action are more neutral, leaving room for an upside surprise if the Fed chief delivers a more detailed plan.
…
Bernanke is set to address an annual gathering of international central bankers and economists in Jackson Hole, Wyo., on Friday.
Featured Keynote $pecial Topic:
America [AA+]: Day 19!
Major case of buyer’s remorse here.
No, I didn’t refinance the Arizona Slim Ranch to buy a hot little car. Nor did I buy a second Ranch to rent out “as an investment.”
What did I do?
I fell for a former coworker-turned New York Life agent’s sales pitch, that’s what. You’ve probably heard this pitch a time or two yourself: Life insurance that’s being sold as (cue up the drumroll) an investment.
It didn’t take much research to figure out that life insurance is protection against economic loss. Nothing more. Nothing less. It is not an investment.
As I’ve said here many times, I’m single and have no dependents. Which doesn’t exactly place me in the center of the target market for life insurance.
So, now it looks like I’m stuck with something I don’t really want or need. And I’m wondering how hard it would be to get out of the insurance contract and find some real investments. You know, the sort of thing that you don’t need an insurance agent to find.
Then don’t hesitate. Call and tell them you want to reverse your decision. In these parts I seem to recall a three day legal window for buyer’s remorse.
Just cancel it. If you have to take a loss then take it (call it tuition) and move on.
Life’s too short to sweat the small stuff.
Which reminds me:
Deborah Tannen (who wrote “You Just Don’t Understand”) said men and women use language for different purposes in that men use language to fix problems (i.e Cancel the policy) while women use language to cope with problems (i.e What am I ever to do?).
This is a good example, IMO.
I should add:
Some problems cannot be fixed (i.e. Dad is drunk yet again but we can’t boot his sorry ass out because he is the one who brings home the bacon so we are stuck).
This is when women have the edge because they know how to cope with the problem. Men get frustrated because the unsolvable problem never gets solved.
If anyone cares to pay attention, the decisions coming from Congress appear to be made by women rather than by men.
There is a view espoused by somebody whose name I don’t remember that notes that groups of men (committees) make decisions (coping decisions) along the same lines as women would make.
Deborah Tannen (who wrote “You Just Don’t Understand”)
I should point out that in my college courses her books were used as an example of popular/junk “science” with regards to interpersonal communication. Same with John Gray’s “Men are From Mars, Women are From Venus”.
Of course that doesn’t mean their books don’t contain valuable insights…
I’ve read both.
Tannen is not junk science. Soft science yes, but not junk.
John Gray is junk.
TITLE: Life (Insurance) begins at 50:
Tax advantages, savings guarantees, + death benefit [ha] that never expires…
Kiplinger’s pg 56 June 2011
I’m assuming you bought something like a whole life policy? Did you just purchase it and pay the first premium? Or have you had it a few years? If you’ve had it a few years already it might be worth it to take whatever the cash value is and get out of the policy.
Whole life isn’t the worst thing in the world (I mean, you could have bought a mcmansion in Oro Valley in 2007), there’s something to be said about having the guaranteed payout at the end of 20 years or what have you, but you’re right in that for someone like yourself it might not make the most sense. You could have bought another annuity that might have been less expensive.
Definitely call the salesman if you just bought it and see if you have any recourse.
I’m assuming you bought something like a whole life policy? Did you just purchase it and pay the first premium? Or have you had it a few years? If you’ve had it a few years already it might be worth it to take whatever the cash value is and get out of the policy.
I bought a whole life policy (read: commission-rich environment for insurance salesmen) and paid the first premium.
I’m trying to reach my attorney to find out what my legal rights of cancellation are in AZ. It’s still before business hours, so I’m getting his law office’s voice mail. But I’ll keep trying.
Essentially, what I plan to do is follow combotechie’s advice, “Just cancel it. If you have to take a loss then take it (call it tuition) and move on.”
So if you have no dependents, who did you designate as the benificiary when you filled out the forms?
A local non-profit.
And, BTW, I can make gifts to that organization without running them through an insurance company first.
Matter of fact, I’m about to step up my monthly donation, which they get right now. They don’t have to wait for me to kick the bucket.
As for kicking the proverbial bucket, the attorney I’m trying to reach also handles my will. Which needs updating. So, after this insurance matter is handled, we’ll deal with the will.
I have to ask, what triggered the buy?
Thanks for asking, Al. Here’s my sheepish answer:
Insurance agent is a guy who worked as a fund raiser at the same organization that employed me back in the late 1980s/early 1990s. (I worked in that outfit’s PR and publications office.)
Guy lost his fund raising job a few months back and now he’s with New York Life. As insurance companies go, it’s one of the better ones. Weiss Ratings even gives it an A, and Weiss is a pretty tough grader.
Well, it didn’t take me long to figure out that:
1. Despite all of this guy’s talk about investments, what New York Life is in business to sell is insurance. Specifically, life insurance. And what does a single person with no dependents like me need life insurance for?
2. As investments go, life insurance is no great shakes. What with all of the commissions and fees involved, it’s a pretty crummy investment. You can do a lot better with a low-cost company like Vanguard. Which sells investments, not insurance in drag.
3. The guy’s been going on and on about the charitable donation aspect of insurance policies, but you know what? You can donate to your heart’s content without running the money through an insurance company.
Okay, now here comes the really bad part: The guy is planning an upcoming private party, and he wanted me to photograph it. Now, this would be an evening event with several hundred people. Truth be told, I priced the proposal rather low, but he couldn’t even afford that. So, no photo gig for me.
But he’s asking me if I can still come so he can refer me to people. Which sounded very good at first, but then I got to thinking things through.
I don’t know about you, but I’ve never found noisy parties being given by people I know to be good sources of business referrals. Because people are there to, well, party. Have a good time. They’re not thinking about work.
Furthermore, there’s what I call the Holy Grail of Business Marketing. It consists of three things:
1. Word of mouth referrals to bring you business.
2. Great search engine positioning to bring you business.
3. Social media that will bring you business.
In almost 20 years of being involved with this, that, or other business venture, I’ve never found the Holy Grail items to be very effective. As another HBB-er has put it, they’re not a substitute for boots-on-the-ground selling.
2. Great search engine positioning to bring you business.
Well, slim, all eyes can say is that without the internet ad’s eyes would have never gotten order$ from Scotland / Germany / Mexico / India / Caribbean Islands / Australia / Spain etc. etc. etc., on account’s I really don’t hanker to the $tandard “bidne$$” networking template of “slap-one-another-on-the-back-whilst-golfing-poledancedrooling-tradeshowshenanigan’$” but eyes was a manufacturer, thus perhaps that is the difference of POV.
In fact, in my new future ‘Bidne-$$” endeavor I’m going to run local print ad’s [how most folks up here in the hindersville still gets idea's, + [rumor's] that will point them to my www site, [thus not needing many catalog's to print & mail]
So it was a mixture of quasi-charity, or something akin to it, and it seeming like a better idea at the time than it really was. I bet most of us here on the HBB are the ’step back and consider this move’ types, and I’d bet many of us have still gotten caught anyway. If it makes you feel better, my purchase of YLO.CA didn’t even have an old associate behind it; just me jumping in without thinking.
“I don’t know about you, but I’ve never found noisy parties being given by people I know to be good sources of business referrals.”
I bet the purpose of the party is for your old associate to renew links with potential clients. Bet he wouldn’t like to here your take on thing. Trying to refer people to your business might help set the mood as business and fun.
I’ve had a few minor encounters with the insurance/investment industry. My impression was that the criteria for getting hired are:
1) Knowing lots of people (who are not poor.)
2) Being personable.
3) Not being to well versed in finance. It’s easier to sell a substandard product to friends, family and acquaintances if you don’t understand that it’s substandard.
I’ve had a few minor encounters with the insurance/investment industry. My impression was that the criteria for getting hired are:
1) Knowing lots of people (who are not poor.)
2) Being personable.
3) Not being to well versed in finance. It’s easier to sell a substandard product to friends, family and acquaintances if you don’t understand that it’s substandard.
The fellow I’ve been dealing with fits the above three items to a tee.
Especially on item #3. I’ve been amazed at how little this guy knows about finance. I mean, jeez-Louise, even I know more, and that’s not saying a whole lot.
So, a virtual toast of your favorite beverage to you, Al. You’ve been very helpful. Thank you!
I thought life insurance was for people who had families depending on them for support. In any event, I learned in a personal finance class in college that anything but term life was a ripoff.
Take comfort in the fact that you are not alone. When I was a young medical resident, I got suckered into the life-insurance-as-investment scheme. I actually had to PAY to get out of the contract. That was painful.
This contract is less than a month old, and the day is still young here. Which means that I have a call in to my attorney, and he hasn’t gotten back to me yet.
I don’t think that this one will be too onerous to get out of, but I want to talk to the attorney anyway.
We’ve all been there. I got talked/guilt-ed into a whole life policy about 17 years ago. A “friend” of mine just got out of the military and was starting a new career. A couple years after I bought it, the life insurance company had a class action suit brought against them, something about deceptive sale practices. Long story, short I got all of my money back and a cancelled policy and have had term life ever since.
Raises hand… Been there, done that too.
Way back when I was an E4 in the navy with a wife and a couple young kids, I go into NCOA to get a discount on car insurance (which was a good deal).
I get this hard sell about how the government $100K life insurance is way to little… at such a young age I can lock in a low life insurance rate for life… Can add money to an attached savings account that pays x% interest(way better than bank accounts)… blah blah.
I bought it hook line and stinker.
Year later I hear how NCOA is pushing these really bad “investment” whole life policies that have HUGE upfront fees to pay the FAT comissions to the salesmen. They use retired non-comissioned officers who the young military guys trust, and the young military guys are being fleeced.
You pay like 10x as much as it would cost for term insurance, and the plan doesn’t begin building a redemption value for like 5 years while it earns back the fat initial fees.
I ended up putting off cancelling it for years, compounding the bad decision.
I ended up putting off cancelling it for years, compounding the bad decision.
Which is precisely what woke me up around 4 a.m. this morn. I was thinking of keeping the thing going for a while.
Then that mean little voice inside of me barked, “Slim, if you’re having this much buyer’s remorse now, it’ll only get worse. So, get out. Now.”
And, while I was out running errands on my bike, I thought about that employer that the insurance guy and I had in common. While I worked there, he wasn’t one of my closest friends. No way.
Matter of fact, I had no idea that he was still in Tucson until I saw him a few months ago. It was right before he got fired from his fund raising job.
This conversation reminds me that my 20-year-level-premium term life insurance expires in *gulp* less than 3 years. When I took out the policy, 20 years seemed like a really long time.
Here in Canada we have Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs). They allow us to put away money each year which can grow without taxation until the wee ones aren’t so wee anymore and going off to school. Fed Gov chips in 20%, and there’s a limit that I can’t remember and am too lazy to look up.
After my little ones were born, we get contacted by a salesperson who is offering what’s called a Group RESP plan. Investors were grouped into cohorts based on when they signed up. The rep was quite personable and had a good presentation, along with some pretty glossy written material. My spidey sense started tingling, and I started asking some detailed questions which were responded to with slick non-answers. I started digging into the written material in front of the rep while my wife asked other questions. Finally the rep left, and never bothered with a follow up phone call.
She knew that I was going to figure out how the thing worked. The Group RESP plan was a non-profit, but the sales agency was for-profit and reps on commission. There were brutal upfront fees (well hidden in the literature), the fund invested in low risk gov bonds, but they advertised high rates of return. The trick was that once you signed up you had to keep paying that same amount every month until the juniors were going off to school. If you missed payments and couldn’t make them up in short order, then you were out of the plan. You’d get your contributions back, but not the 20% gov match or any interest which went to the rest of the cohort.
So basically, the good returns for those that hung in and the commissions and fees were payed for by the suckers that dropped out.
Derek Kravitz,
AP Real Estate Writer
Tuesday August 23, 2011, 4:42 pm EDT
A telling sign of how bad things have gotten for the housing industry: Prices have dropped more since the recession started, on a percentage basis, than during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
And it took 19 years for prices to fully recover after the Depression.
And it took 19 years for prices to fully recover after the Depression.
Exactly why ol’ Hwy’s in no hurry to add select raw land for my children & my childrens children to fight & argue, over & about, a little further along down the road.
(That, & future innovative improvements in home related technologies)
Mandatory evacuations are ordered in our area any time the wind is expected to be above 50mph. Ambulances cannot drive above a 50mph wind speed. We are also on the coast with water and bridges all around. No orders yet but they are not meeting until Thursday.
All eyes are on Jackson Hole. Republicans believe the government has no business doing anything to preserve values in the labor market. The question for Republican Ben Bernanke is, how about the stock market?
We all know that the govt’s job is to preserve the rich at the expense of everyone else.
US Mortgage Purchase Applications at 15-Year Low
24 Aug 2011 | By: Reuters
U.S. home mortgage applications for purchases fell to a nearly 15-year low last week as resurgent worries about the strength of the economy kept buyers at bay, an industry group said on Wednesday.
The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage application activity, which includes both refinancing and home purchase demand, fell 2.4 percent in the week ended Aug.19.
The seasonally adjusted gauge of loan requests for home purchases tumbled 5.7 percent to its lowest level since December 1996, the MBA said.
Refinance demand also sagged as interest rates rose, with the refinance index slipping 1.7 percent.
“Another week of volatile markets and rampant uncertainty regarding the economy kept prospective homebuyers on the sidelines, with purchase applications falling to a 15-year low,” Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s vice president of research and economics, said in a statement.
“This decline impacted borrowers across the board, with purchase applications for jumbo loans falling by more than 15 percent and purchase applications for the government housing programs falling by 8.2 percent.” The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 79.8 percent of total applications from 78.8 percent the week before.
Fixed 30-year mortgage rates averaged 4.39 percent, up from 4.32 percent.
GE Healthcare cutting 81 jobs
By John Schmid of the Journal Sentinel
GE Healthcare Ltd. is cutting 81 jobs at its Milwaukee and Waukesha facilities, or 1.2% of the company’s positions in southeastern Wisconsin, the medical technologies division of the General Electric Co. said Tuesday.
In response to questions, a GE spokesman said notifications were sent out on Friday and that GE is reducing staff in response to the economic uncertainty in the U.S. and Europe.
GE, which employs about 6,500 in southeastern Wisconsin, provided few other details.
Previously:
The MegaInc.$,…they’re $uffering $o! Hurry! reduce/eliminate their taxe$, hurry,… Agonie$ & Pain$, help ‘em!.
“Of the roughly $90 billion of profits repatriated in 2004, Pfizer was by far the biggest beneficiary, saving $11 billion in taxes, Johnston recalls. “They started destroying jobs the day they brought it back” and have cut 40,000 U.S. jobs in the ensuing years.”
Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker / Yahoo:
There’s a good chance any “grand bargain” on the deficit will include a one-time tax holiday to allow U.S.-based corporations to repatriate overseas profits, estimated at more than $1 trillion. The issue has been out of the headlines lately but has the support of a host of Fortune 500 companies, including Apple, Cisco, Duke Energy and Oracle, as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Taxing the System
The “fundamental problem” with a tax holiday is that it sends a message to corporations to “‘keep more profits offshore and then you can bring ‘em back and pay virtually no tax,’” Johnston says.
Furthermore, there’s no good way to ensure that a tax holiday will lead to job creation, he says, citing the last time this was tried — via the 2004 Jobs Creation Act — as evidence of the folly of tax holidays.
Meanwhile, tax holidays on overseas assets do nothing for purely domestic-focused companies, which tend to be smaller and family owned, Johnston notes.
“…if you tax them less, they can hire more people.”
“tax holidays on overseas assets do nothing for purely domestic-focused companies, which tend to be smaller and family owned”
Giving the little domestic guy a break would be unconventional.
There’s “small” bidne$$, then there’s “micro” bidne$$, then there’s NOY-Bidne$$
JP Morgan May Take Over Bank Of America
By 24/7 Wall St.
There is a rumor circulated on Wall St. that JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) will takeover Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) within the week. The government will support the deal with a $100 billion investment in preferred shares issued by the combined entity. Alternatively, the government may guarantee the value of a large pool of Bank of America assets. The word is that Treasury Secretary Geithner has discussed the transaction with JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.The “merger” would completely destroy the value of BAC’s common shares.
The government feels that the deal may be necessary as Bank of America struggles unsuccessfully to close several transactions to bolster its balance sheet. The Wall Street Journal reported that the financial firm will need to raise $200 billion which would be another possible event that would wipe out common shareholders.
Bank of America’s fortunes have been hurt by events in just the last few days. A New York State judge agreed to allow institutional investors to intervene in an $8.5 billion settlement between the bank and groups that lost money on mortgage-backed securities. China Construction Bank Corp said Bank of American will continue to hold 50% of its share in the foreign financial firm. Many investors hoped Bank of America would sell its entire stake to raise money. Several analysts believe that the costs of owning mortgage firm Countrywide Credit have grown unexpectedly large.
Under federal law, JP Morgan and Bank of America could not combine because together they would have too large a share of several financial markets in the US. Treasury would apparently work with other government agencies to have those rules suspended and then the new combined bank would sell assets to get back into compliance later.
Pretty soon it could just be Jamie boy and Ben…
Yep, and when BB retires from his post Jamie will be appointed and all will be right with the world of finance.
“…the new combined bank would sell assets to get back into compliance later.”
Don’t hold your breath. Note also, how when the my-tee ‘Merikun financial juggernaut sputters the first response is to “have those rules suspended”.
ISTR that JPM Chase also ate Bear Stearns. Wonder how that’s worked out for them.
if teddy was the Trust Buster….obama is the Trust Maker.
…. in other words Federal Reserve proxy JPMC will own BofA.
Because….hmmm… let me see…. “we need MORE rich people”?
777 School Employees Will Be Let Go, in the Largest Layoff Under
By FERNANDA SANTOS The New York Times
Nearly 780 employees of the New York City Education Department will lose their jobs by October, in the largest layoff at a single agency since Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg took office in 2002.
The layoffs are a direct consequence of budget cuts to schools, which have occurred in each of the last four years, forcing principals to make tough decisions about what and whom to do without. Most of the burden will be shouldered by one labor union, District Council 37, which represents 95 percent of the workers who will be let go.
School aides were saved from layoffs last year by federal money, but 438 — about 5 percent of their ranks — will now lose their jobs. Some 82 parent coordinators, about 6 percent of the total, will also lose their jobs, essentially severing the main link between parents and administrators at dozens of schools.
The budget cuts have also cost 2,186 teachers their full-time, fixed assignments at city schools. Teachers were spared from layoffs, however, because of an agreement brokered in June between the Bloomberg administration and their union, which offered small concessions in exchange for job security for its 200,000 members, including 75,000 teachers.
A spokesman for Mr. Bloomberg, Marc La Vorgna, placed the blame for the layoffs squarely on District Council 37 and the other six unions whose members will also be let go. “The unions involved would not agree to any real savings that could have saved these jobs,” he said in a statement.
Wikipedia says approximately 1.1 Million students attend NYC public schools. Above article says there are 75,000 teachers. Doing some basic math, the student/teacher ratio works out to about 14.66 students per teacher.
Wow.
Don’t forget to add in ‘administrators’.
Yet in Wisconsin - where public union collective bargaining was partially done away with…
They are actually HIRING teachers.
I agree that unions suck up too much wealth. They are worse than a layer of government beurocracy.
If I were king, I’d abolish unions and then impliment all the things unions have fought for into federal labor law.
If I were king, I’d abolish unions and then impliment all the things unions have fought for into federal labor law.
The problem is that our “Kings” are doing just the opposite.
Company lays off 100 at Arkansas plant
ARKADELPHIA, Ark. (AP) — An international compressor manufacturer has laid off 100 workers at its Arkadelphia factory because of a seasonal slow-down in the industry.
Danfoss Scroll Technologies said in a statement the layoffs of 60 full-time employees and all temporary workers were effective this past Thursday. Officials said they had to adjust the business in order to secure its long-term success.
Danfoss Scroll general manager Paul Dean told the Arkadelphia Siftings Herald that about 40 temporary workers were affected and about 400 people are still employed.
The statement also said officials have eliminated the factory’s third-shift in production and will operate with one shift in assembly and one in machining.
The company also has implemented productivity improvement efforts to ensure it is price-competitive in the residential air conditioning market.
I am thinking a good many people may be disappointed when the Bernake releases his statement from Jackson’s Hole. I think it will be mostly hot air and no QE-111 launch at this time. I hope I am correct.
You have to admit, reading the financial press this week is downright gut busting.
During the “prosperity” of the past few decades we watched the media/popular culture lionize CEOs, big shareholders, hedgies, etc. They were the astronauts of our age. We were urged to mimic their every move lest we be left behind.
Now these men, these pillars of our enlightened modern age, hang on every word dripping from the lips of a little bald man.
Earth to Bernanke! Earth to Bernanke! Come in Bernanke!
Astronauts or Space Cadets?
http://www.joshuadysart.com/journal/archives/mars030a.jpg
“They were the astronauts of our age.”
That makes me want to vomit.
QE-111
——
No need to be so negative. I’m sure one of the QE’s between 3-and 110 will work just fine!
U.S. housing faces extra drag - low appraisals
NEW YORK | Wed Aug 24, 2011
(Reuters) - When Sean McGowan signed a contract to buy a New Jersey home in November, he didn’t expect he’d still be living with his parents nearly a year later.
The deal fell through after two appraisals came in tens of thousands of dollars below the contract price, part of a wider trend of differences over property valuations that is compounding the U.S. housing crisis.
“It was very frustrating. We really wanted to move in,” said McGowan, a 31-year-old real estate lawyer.
Many housing experts say low appraisals are yet another headwind for a housing market already suffering from a plunge in prices, high unemployment and tight credit.
Lenders are forced to cap their mortgage loans at the value set by appraisers and buyers and sellers often can’t agree on how to make up the difference with an original deal price.
“It’s hard to talk about any recovery of the housing market and home prices until the appraisal issue is squared away, and that is a broad issue,” said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance, a Maryland-based trade publication.
Sixteen percent of Realtors reported contract cancellations in July, matching June’s level, which was the highest since March 2010, when the National Association of Realtors began collecting data.
Nine percent reported contract delays due to low appraisals, and 13 percent reported a contract was renegotiated to a lower price because an appraisal came in below the original price in the last three months, the NAR said.
Appraisers in the United States have long been used to controversy for their role in the country’s housing market.
The appraisal system has been reformed in recent years to put a stop to the high estimates of property values that even appraisers admit helped inflate the housing bubble.
Many industry watchers argue the new regime has caused the pendulum to swing too far to the other side, inadvertently causing the opposite problem: artificially low appraisals.
“The industry, both from a lending perspective and appraising perspective, has gotten as outrageously conservative now as they were outrageously aggressive a few years ago,” said Rick Sharga, senior vice president of data firm RealtyTrac.
well…then shouldn’t the seller just lower the price? Oh, never mind.
+1
“buyers and sellers often can’t agree on how to make up the difference with an original deal price.”
Translation: seller has no cash to bring to the table.
Blasphemer!
Homeowner Groups Sue to Force Foreclosures
By John Gittelsohn - Aug 24, 2011 Bloomberg
Members of the Vintage East Condominium Association in Miami Beach got tired of waiting for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) to foreclose on unit 9, so they sued the bank in February to take control of the property.
In June, more than four years after the owner stopped making payments, a judge ruled that JPMorgan lost its claim to the $144,000 mortgage. The apartment is now on the market for $87,500, and the association may stave off insolvency with proceeds from the sale and a new owner who pays monthly dues, said Jane Losson, a board member at the complex. Four of the 11 other owners at the property are also behind on dues.
“I find it an outrage that the bank had decided to do nothing and the other owners got stuck,” Losson, who’s had her Vintage East condo since 2004, said in a telephone interview. “If we get this unit sold, we’ll have a little money.”
Financially troubled condo associations are taking banks to court as foreclosure delays enable delinquent homeowners to stay in their buildings for years, often without paying dues that keep boards running. The groups start by pressuring lenders to speed up home seizures and take over payment of the monthly fees. In extreme situations, like the Vintage East case, associations may force banks to give up rights to the property.
“The lenders are stalling foreclosures,” Ben Solomon, the Miami Beach attorney for the Vintage East association, said in a telephone interview. “Our complaints say the banks abandoned their interest and either need to accept responsibility for the title or walk away.”
‘Mortgage Terminator’
Solomon, whose Association Law Group represented homeowner boards in 16 Florida counties with 15,000 delinquent owners, also won what he calls “mortgage terminator” lawsuits in claims against Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), Deutsche Bank AG (DB) and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), according to court records.
About 60 million people, or one in five Americans, live in residences with condo or homeowner associations, according to the Community Associations Institute, a trade group in Falls Church, Virginia. States with some of the highest foreclosure rates — Florida, Nevada, California and Arizona — are also among those with the biggest share of populations in homeowner associations, said Frank Rathbun, spokesman for the 30,000- member trade group. The associations maintain residents’ common interests such as parking lots, roofs, landscaping and trash removal.
“About 50 percent of our members said the housing crisis and economic downturn have had a severe or serious impact on their association,” Rathbun said in a telephone interview.
From the Washington Post:
Rick Perry holds the record on executions
“In his nearly 11 years as the state’s chief executive, Perry, now running for the Republican presidential nomination, has overseen more executions than any governor in modern history: 234 and counting. That’s more than the combined total in the next two states —Oklahoma and Virginia —since the death penalty was restored 35 years ago.
He vetoed a bill that would have spared the mentally retarded, and sharply criticized a Supreme Court ruling that juveniles were not eligible for the death penalty. He has found during his tenure only one inmate on Texas’s crowded death row he thought should receive the lesser sentence of life in prison.”
There’s nothing more all-American than executing retards, except perhaps dropping bombs on brown and black people. USA! USA! USA!
There’s nothing more all-American than executing retards, except perhaps dropping bombs on brown and black people.
Are you suggesting it’s Perry’s fault that the judge and jury found these people guilty and sentenced them to death?
Certainly not. The executions probably were supported by a majority of his constituents. It’s just sad that this country remains on a short list of nations with the death penalty that includes China, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and other gems of human rights.
The executions probably were supported by a majority of his constituents.
Perhaps, but even that is irrelevant. Justice, as per the laws on the books, should not be subject to public whim (though laws themselves may be).
Justice? JUSTICE? Go ahead. Demand it. Go for it.
That must feel odd, being a devoted oath commited “TrueEvangelicalist™” whilst doing your daily job of signing a State issued death decree for a human animal.
Cognitive dissonance? What, me worry?
The Texas Govornor is only allowed to grant a full
pardon to a prisoner after the Board of Pardons and Paroles votes to grant a pardon.
Otherwise, the governor is limited to a 30 day reprieve on executions.
/Govornor Hogg used to sell pardons. Got kicked outta office for it. //His wife Ma Hogg won the next election.
So, that’s what’s on the law books now,…
canshouldought that be modified?It’s Perry’s fault for vetoing a law that would have spared the mentally retarded, who are probably more likely to be railroaded into false confessions.
He signed his own death sentence.
He vetoed a bill that would have spared the mentally retarded, and sharply criticized a Supreme Court ruling that juveniles were not eligible for the death penalty.
Compassionate Conservative + Jesus the woodworker from Oaxaca + white “cowboy” hat = Sis boom rah! Judgment Day!, Sis boom rah! Judgment Day!
“let those who are without sin pull the 1st switch…” or something like that.
That guy really scares me HWY ,as do some of the others.
I am not a big death penalty fan, mostly because I don’t trust government prosecutors. One innocent man being executed is one too many.
exactly.
“I am not a big death penalty fan, mostly because I don’t trust government prosecutors.”
Yes. Reasonable minds can disagree about the concept of the ultimate punishment. But the wheels of justice do not turn smoothly. In a perfect world, we could trust ourselves/our govt. to execute those who ‘deserve it’. Justice is not a perfect process, therefore I oppose the death penalty, even if some who deserve it have to live. I can only guess the number of innocents who have been executed at the hands of the state.
That’s why Nick all death penalty prisoners deserve one last look at the evidence by:
http://www.innocenceproject.org
once the innocent project agrees they have the right person…then make it a swift execution no more then 30 days.
I knew a few lawyers who did work on these type cases and once the DNA proved they had the right person, they pretty much stopped working on the case because they only had so much $$$ to spend.
Next Stimulus Must Be for the Housing Market: Hays
By Matt Nesto | Breakout
As investors anxiously wait to see whether or not Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has another rabbit up his sleeve, at least one pro is calling for the next round of stimulus to come from the government rather than the Federal Reserve.
“If you look at the economy, it is slowly coming back, but there is one area - a massive area - that has hit this economy for the last two years, and its housing,” says Don Hays, President and Chief Investment Strategist of Hays Advisory. He wants policymakers to try something new and different that will jump-start the entire economy, not just the banking sector. As much as stimulus has become a much harder sell in Washington, D.C. these days, I think a populist pitch to prop up housing might just catch on.
Hays is particularly fond of a proposal that is being circulated by Ed Yardeni that would make rental income tax-free for a decade to encourage investment into vacant homes. Given the dubious benefits derived from the first few rounds of stimulus and easing, a handout to housing seems at least worth a try.
“We have 2.2 million people in the housing construction industry that are still out of work and cannot get a job so that is the place that has to be stimulated,” Hays says. “We think that is the one area that has not had the same long term encouragement.”
Normally, when economies are rebounding, housing is a locomotive. But this time Hays says it has been a “terrible laggard” that has been left behind. Whether you agree or disagree, the reality is that housing plays an outsized role in our economy and to attempt to repair one without the other just doesn’t make sense.
As Hays sees it, a shot-in-the-arm for housing would lead to knock-on effect for the broader economy, a spiral-effect that would feed on itself for the better. “People feel more optimistic. Banks start lending. Companies start hiring more and it sort of feeds on itself and that’s what we have to have, that stimulus, that fuel, to kick-start the economy.”
Hays is clear in pointing out that this is not an investment idea, but something for Washington, D.C. to consider as a starting pointing at a time of great hunger for fresh solutions. Nothing ventured, nothing gained?
Hays is particularly fond of a proposal that is being circulated by Ed Yardeni that would make rental income tax-free for a decade to encourage investment into vacant homes. Given the dubious benefits derived from the first few rounds of stimulus and easing, a handout to housing seems at least worth a try.
As if we don’t have enough rental vacancies already. And where are all the tenants going to come from?
Well, further up today’s thread we hear of the gov’t desire to move foreclosed properties in bulk to investors. So, if rental income were to be made tax exempt would that not be a huge incentive for VC and other big players to sop up as much inventory on the cheap as possible?
Somehow that doesn’t sound like it will lead to any kind of narrowing of the wealth gap, let alone equate to a tax increase on the “rich”. Sounds more like a gimme for the big boys, a tax shelter hid in plain sight.
But slim nailed it.
Unless those houses sit empty, they aren’t taken off the market. Turning them into rentals will just drive down rent, crush those that were first to catch falling knives, and increase the reason to walk.
” As if we don’t have enough rental vacancies already..”
Why weren’t the builders paid to stop building? They’ve paid farmers to stop farming. Do we have too many housing units or don’t we?
“As Hays sees it, a shot-in-the-arm for housing would lead to knock-on effect for the broader economy, a spiral-effect that would feed on itself for the better.”
These dummies ignore the overhang from Easy Al’s two-decades long shot in the housing market’s arm, which has resulted in a glut of 6m or so foreclosure homes. Building more houses now would be like handing a recovering alcoholic another bottle of Jack Daniels.
This is a special day on the Blue Skye; The Monarch caterpilar that the first mate brought aboard and fed milkweed leaves is today a butterfly. Watched the wings turn from crumpled tissue to rigid this morning. There haven’t been many of these guys this year. Last year was a devastating season for them. A month from now it will be in Mexico.
Was called Horatio, but turns out to be a Rachael.
Was called Horatio, but turns out to be a Rachael.
Isn’t it just wonderful how Mother-Nature makes everything so clean cut! Nary a mistake!,…nor seldom a mis-interpretation!
“Horatio [tho thou started off a female, but now art male], do you take Rachael to be you lawfully wedded S.O.”?
Fella’s-Y-yee’s all are doomed!, …perhaps:
Future evolution[Relax, it's just scientific..."speculation!" y'all don't have to sign a pledge or anything.]
In the terminal stages of the degeneration of the Y chromosome, other chromosomes increasingly take over genes and functions formerly associated with it. Finally, the Y chromosome disappears entirely, and a new sex-determining system arises.
Primate Y chromosomes, including in humans, have degenerated so much that primates will also evolve new sex determination systems relatively soon, in about 14 million years in humans.
“Satchmo”
What A Wonderful World
Songwriters: Thiele, Robert; Weiss, George David;
I see trees of green, red roses too
I see them bloom, for me and you
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
I see skies of blue, and clouds of white
The bright blessed day, dark sacred night
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
The colors of the rainbow, so pretty in the sky
Are also on the faces, of people going by
I see friends shaking hands, sayin’, “How do you do?”
They’re really sayin’, “I love you”
I hear babies cryin’, I watch them grow
They’ll learn much more, than I’ll ever know
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
Yes, I think to myself
What a wonderful world
Oh yeah
Congratulations! There have been precious few monarchs around these parts this summer. What (or who) was responsible for the devastation in monarch populations last year? Habitat loss/pollution/disease/other?
Bad weather in Mexico over the winter. Too hot or too cold in Quebec two years ago. Milkweed loss to farming, house building and busy roadside maintenance crews.
Now that you mention milkweed, I recall reading about Monsanto (the Evil Company of Dooooom) developing Roundup-ready seeds so farmers could blast all the milkweed out of their fields, leaving the desired crop intact. One side effect was a sharp decline in butterfly populations.
I haven’t seen one of those in NYC in years. I used to look forward to it. Orange is my favorite color, and fall my favorite season.
Somebody is dumping gold and buying BoA. Looks like the taxpayer has the priviledge to fund another bailout.
Home Prices Decline 5.9% in Second Quarter- Bloomberg
U.S. home prices fell 5.9 percent in the second quarter from a year earlier, the biggest drop since 2009, as foreclosures added to the inventory of properties for sale, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Thank you WMBZ…….
No comments folks? Nothing?
This is the first I’ve the data reported as a decline. Take a looky here on Marketwatch…. they headline the news release as a price increase.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-housing-prices-climb-09-in-june-fhfa-says-2011-08-24
…. and thank you Michael Bloomberg. The rest of you in the media can rot in hell.
European Bank Job ‘Bloodbath’ Surpasses 40,000
bloomberg
Gavin Finch and Liam Vaughan, August 24, 2011
UBS AG (UBSN)’s decision to cut 5 percent of its workforce brings to more than 40,000 the number of jobs cut by European banks in the past month as the region’s worsening sovereign debt crisis crimps trading revenue.
UBS, Switzerland’s biggest bank, said yesterday it will eliminate 3,500 jobs, mainly from its investment bank. It follows HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA), which announced 30,000 cuts on Aug. 1, Barclays Plc (BARC), which is cutting headcount by 3,000, and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (RBS), which is eliminating 2,000 posts. Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN) announced 2,000 reductions on July 28.
European banks are slashing jobs this year six times faster than their U.S. peers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, as concerns about the creditworthiness of Italy, Spain and France roil financial markets and reduce income from fixed- income trading, stock and bond underwriting as well as mergers and acquisitions. Financial firms are also cutting costs as regulators force banks to hold more and better quality capital to withstand future shocks.
“It’s a bloodbath, and I expect things to get worse before they get better,” said Jonathan Evans, chairman of executive- search firm Sammons Associates in London. “I cannot see a lot of those who have lost their jobs getting re-employed. Regardless of how good someone is, no one wants to talk about hiring. Life will be very difficult for two or three years.”
A couple of things I heard yesterday:
1. A broker who is primarily focused in the northern Central Valley, CA and who has been selling lender REO noted that in the beginning of the mess, he might have several nicer homes in a newer subdivision to sell. Now most of what he has to sell is pretty crummy (75/25 crummy to decent ratio).
2. To my surprise (no, shock), a regional builder called Atherton Homes is selling homes in Manteca at upwards of $150 per square foot.
http://www.atherton-homes.com/summitcollection.html
I thought maybe these were simply listed prices and actual sales were much lower. However, if you look at Zillow, sale prices are pretty high (and there are quite a few of them).
http://www.zillow.com/homes/manteca,-CA_rb/#/homes/for_sale/Manteca-CA/53148_rid/6m_days/37.837439,-121.215915,37.827525,-121.249861_rect/15_zm/1_rs/1_fr/
Without the Atherton Homes sales data, I would have shrugged my shoulders at the commentary from the broker. However, the new home sales data was new to me and surprising. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. It won’t take burning through ALL of the shadow inventory to have housing starts increase, just the higher quality stuff. At that point new homes will have generally less competition, as the crummy foreclosures are not really competition for new homes. If someone wants a new home, they want a new home.
Less supply of quality foreclosures and other supply is the only explanation for the Atherton Homes sales.
OK, flame on…waiting for it.
If you voted for him in ’08 to prove you were not a racist, you have to vote for someone else in ’12 to prove you’re not an idiot. i read this today, and have been chuckling to myself for hours…had to share it.
Priceless. Forwarding to my email list.
Although, with the field the way it currently is, talk about a rock and a hard place. Unless Paul gets the nomination.
I’m here to tell ya, though, it’s gonna be Huntsman. Wait and see. Perry & Bachmann too scary, Mitt too squishy.
Huntsman is a morman.
Sorry, but I just don’t see the Republican party nominating someone that does not accept the holy trinity, that Jesus is the one and only Lamb of God who died on the cross to forgive men of their sins, personal lord and savior… Blah, blah.
Sorry, but I just don’t see the Republican party nominating someone that does not accept the holy trinity, that Jesus is the one and only Lamb of God who died on the cross to forgive men of their sins, personal lord and savior… Blah, blah.
Name 1 democrat or republican president in the last 100 years that did not.
Even Obama has publically said he is Christian and goes to church.
Even Obama has publicly said he is Christian and goes to church.
but, but, but, eyes thought the “true” claim was that lil’ Opie was a (Non-Hawaiian) Indonesian-Kenyan Muslim who had love-in sessions with a Satan worshiper?
He looks like one, he talks like one, he smells like one…right slipperybanana?
Unless Paul gets the nomination.
If you want to see that (all of you reading), then register republican and vote in the primary.
Even if you don’t want to see RP get elected, wouldn’t it be nice to have him in the debates that are aired on prime time? To actually have public debate over the important issues?
You can vote against him come November, but at least get him in the race. I think our country would be much better off if we could just get things that far…
He ran circles around everyone in the last debate (and, I assume, the one before that, although I didn’t see it).
Not sure why the right doesn’t embrace him.
i read this today, and have been chuckling to myself for hours
Hey, eyes like it! really.
This is what is makin’ Hwy chuckle also [actually eyes in “$hock & Awe!”:
They are further arguing that if their advice had been heeded, the intervention in Libya would have been swifter and even more successful!.
heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)
A new era in U.S. foreign policy:
By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
Back in March, many neoconservatives in Washington were extremely dismissive of the way President Obama was handling the intervention in Libya. They argued that he was doing too little and acting too late – that his approach was too multilateral and lacked cohesiveness. They continuously criticized President Obama for, in the words of an anonymous White House advisor, “leading from behind.”
But now that these critics are confronted with the success of the Libya operation, they are changing their tune and claiming paternity of the operation. They are further arguing that if their advice had been heeded, the intervention in Libya would have been swifter and even more successful. But the Libya intervention is so significant precisely because it did not follow the traditional pattern of U.S.-led interventions. Indeed, it launched a new era in U.S. foreign policy.
It is important to emphasize that even though it was a “supporting role,” the U.S. was indispensable to the operation. Nobody else could have eliminated Gadhafi’s air defenses – and, effectively, his air force - within three days. Without America, the operation in Libya could not have taken place. But the U.S. was also “supporting” in the sense that after these initial strikes, it moved into the background and asked its NATO partners to do the heavy lifting. Thereafter, the U.S. intervened only when it felt it needed to. All of this suggests a very different model for intervention, which I believe is a vast improvement over the old, expansive and expensive model.
Success has many fathers, failure is an orphan.
success of the Libya operation
Yeah, like that of Iraq, right? Just wait few more months….
Eyes hear an echo that sounds like someone chewing on sour grapes:
“heheheeeeheeeee”
And if we voted for hm bacuase McSame would have been as bad or worse, then look at the current field of Republicans….
Really? These are our choices?
I dont get it.
News for members of the single payer/public option fan club:
Survey: Employers consider ending health coverage
Looks like our nation’s private employers are getting out of the health insurance business. And I’ll betcha money that Uncle Sam will have to pick up the slack.
A continuation of a trend going back two decades.
Health care reform was not nearly radical enough. Health insurance needs to be cut off from place of work entirely, to free up labor market mobility and support entrenuership.
What you need is for the government to pay for the basics, and individuals to pay for everything else if they can afford it.
I think it should be more that the government pays for catastrophic coverage in case you get cancer or get hit by a dump truck. The basics, you catch a cold, should be covered by you.
Are you from Maine?
Others on here have likened it to car insurance. You handle the oil changes and car washes, and insurance handles accidents.
I tend to agree.
Az Silm …Thats the whole idea with Corporate America ,pass that business expense to the government or the employee .
Do you think Corporate America is going to raise salaries to make up for dumping benefits …hell no .
As if the government or the employee is going to be able to afford
covering all the people private industry wants to dump . A breakdown of the long term systems for the benefit of greater profits for the industrial complex . Make the worker pay ,make the
Government pay .
Part of the long term theme and takeover by Corporate America and Wall Street . How dare the American worker expect benefits
from their employer ,or pensions ,or wages that keep up with inflation . Your suppose to work so some billionaire can get more billions and the stock market goes up higher .
—Thats the whole idea with Corporate America ,pass that business expense to the government or the employee . —
Weird. That’s how they do it in all those countries we don’t label, “corporatist”. Canada, England, Japan…
As I xplain to Mr. Cole as we head out camping to Utarrr…[driving through Vega$ babeeee!] see those tall radiant ca$ino buildings, that’s where the monie$ game$ are played, x1 person against “the house”…yes, there are winners & losers son, some win more often than others…but as tall as those $parking buildings are, there’s even taller one’s in Manhattan NY, London, Hong Kong,…then our conversation tends to drift to geography & population numbers. :-/
Well like they used to say at Cheney-Halliburton Inc. : “Bidne$$ is Bidne$$!”
Libya rebels announce $1.7 million bounty for Qaddafi
Libya rebel leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil also said that the National Transitional Council would allow Qaddafi safe passage into exile if he relinquished power.
By Kristen Chick, Correspondent / August 24, 2011 / The Christian Science Monitor.
Mustafa Abdel Jalil, leader of the National Transitional Council (NTC) that has been governing rebel territory from Benghazi, announced Tuesday that anyone who kills or captures Mr. Qaddafi will be pardoned for any past crimes, in an attempt to entice one of his inner circle to give him up. The money had been raised by businessmen, he said.
[Talk about your "compassionate conservative" type leaders:]
Mr. Jalil also said that if Qaddafi renounces his claim to power, the NTC would give him safe passage to any country that would accept him for exile. He said the NTC would allow the Libyan leader to go to a nation that is not a member of the International Criminal Court, which has issued a warrant for Qaddafi’s arrest on charges of crimes against humanity – which in practice would allow Qaddafi to escape ICC trial.
You can rationalize all you want, but it won’t protect you from the downside of irrational exuberance.
MarketWatch dot com
The Tell
The Markets News and Analysis Blog
Don’t read too much into gold’s drop
August 24, 2011, 12:25 PM
If gold was actually in a bubble, has that bubble popped? It’s a question some traders are asking today with gold GC1Z dropping by as much as $97 an ounce, or over 5%, but it’s probably safer not to read too much into the metal’s decline.
Kitco Metals analyst Jon Nadler on Tuesday argued that speculators were turning gold into a risky bet, even as other analysts were chiming in with predictions for gold at $2,000 – or even $3,000 an ounce.
But Austin Kiddle, an analyst at London-based bullion brokers Sharps Pixley, said Wednesday that the current downward movement in gold is “more in line with profit taking than a move out of safe-haven territory,” especially given that next month is a big month for gold as the Indian wedding season begins.
“There will still be buying on the dips that should support gold (in some fashion), and we will be lead by some factors in the next few days (U.S. Jobless data and Jackson Hole) which will give a clearer direction on the price of gold,” he said, but “at the moment, it’s watch and wait.”
-Myra Saefong
to much money flowing in one direction always creates a bubble
eventually .
“A vastly over$old Debacle…” Ben Jones
1. DotBomb$
2. Get$tucco
The HBB magnet stills points the true direction!
Cash-strapped Einstein Moomjy files for Chapter 11
August 24, 2011 BY HUGH R. MORLEY The Record
Einstein Moomjy, the 63-year-old rug store with its flagship showroom in Paramus, has filed for bankruptcy re-organization and cut its operations to the bone in the face of plummeting revenue brought on by the housing slump and recession.
The company, started in 1948 by Iranian and German immigrants, has slimmed its workforce from more than three dozen to just a pair of unpaid employees and members of the Moomjy family who run the company’s three stores, in Paramus, North Plainfield and Whippany, the company’s bankruptcy attorney said.
Daniel M. Stolz, the Millburn-based attorney, said Einstein Moomjy hopes that a bankruptcy sale, expected to take place in late September or early October, at the three stores will enable the company to get back on its feet and continue to operate North Plainfield and Whippany stores. The lease on the Paramus store expires in February, he said, and the company does not expect the landlord to extend it.
“There is hope that these sales would raise enough money to keep the creditors happy and allow the Moomjys to continue in business,” Stolz said.
In Chapter 11 bankruptcy papers filed Aug. 19, Einstein Moomjy reported assets of $2.5 million and liabilities of $4.47 million, about half of that for unpaid rent.
“The economy has been killing them,” said Stolz. “They kept hoping that the economy was going to turn around. They kept waiting and waiting for it [business] to pick up, and it just hasn’t been the case.”
Revenue so far this year is about $921,000, compared to $6.65 million in 2010 and $13.35 million in 2009, court papers show.
the 63-year-old rug store :-/
In “The OC!” there was a rug company that was in bk for like,… 30 years
I think there urgency mantra’$ went something like this:
Hurry! Hurry! Hurry!…were’ closing soon!
What is it with these rug companies? I can remember them being around in my childhood and they did just fine.
Did they expect that the stock/housing bubble years would continue indefinitely?
I think there’s more wrong here that just that old bugaboo, The Economy.
It’s like September 11 — remember that? It seemed like every business that ran into trouble blamed it on 9/11.
Which I can understand if your biz was located at Fulton Street and Broadway in lower Manhattan. But in other cities and states? Please.
BWAHAHAHicHAHAHicHAHAHAHAHicHAHAHic* (DennisN™)
Chavez nationalise$ gold:
Venezuela / August 25, 2011 / The Sydney Morning Herald
CARACAS. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has signed into law the official nationalisation of the country’s gold mining industry.
He signed the ”natural law that reserves the exploration and management of gold, as well as the connected activities, to the state” at a ministerial meeting broadcast by state media.
During the ceremony, Mr Chavez brandished gold bullion from the Central Bank of Venezuela’s coffers, which holds 154 tonnes of gold, an amount worth $US7.2 billion ($A6.88 billion).
Last week, he announced his intention to nationalise the country’s gold sector in order to stop ”mafias” exploiting Venezuela’s natural resources. Illegal mining makes up 60 per cent of local production in the gold sector.
Obama consults with GE, AMEX execs on job creation
Obama seeks advice from leaders of his jobs council in advance of economics speech August 24, 2011
VINEYARD HAVEN, Mass. (AP) — President Barack Obama is soliciting advice from the co-chairmen of his jobs council on employment boosting initiatives in advance of a major economics address he intends to deliver after Labor Day.
The discussions Wednesday morning with General Electric CEO and chairman Jeffrey Immelt and American Express CEO and chairman Kenneth Chenault focused on increasing engineering graduates and adding construction jobs by making buildings more energy efficient. That from White House spokesman Josh Earnest.
Earnest said the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness will hold meetings Aug. 31 in Portland , Ore., to discuss efforts to add engineers to the workforce. Another meeting Sept. 1 in Dallas will focus on spending on infrastructure projects.
Another meeting Sept. 1 in Dallas will focus on spending on infrastructure projects.
Wonderful!
Maybe like Japan we’ll get some kick butt infrastructure out of this. Maybe even a bullet train line or two.
Like the comments the other day, not so gung-ho for the National point-to-point, but cool would be state-to-state, region-to-region destinations. Anywho, CA is a looooong state.
Job$! Job$! Job$!
Maybe like Japan we’ll get some kick butt infrastructure out of this. Maybe even a bullet train line or two.
Anyone ever ridden a bullet train? Closest I’ve ever come is Amtrak Acela, which is more like a pullet than a bullet.
“Anyone ever ridden a bullet train? ”
I’ve been on the TGV in France. This was back in 1990, it was pretty new then. Man, it hauls. There are many routes here in the US where there would be great demand. I just hope that if we do it, we do it right, if that’s not asking too much!
I rode the EuroStar once.
If you start off an idea/suggestion with how well they do it in Europe, you won’t have a chance of getting it off the ground.
We’re ‘Merukins! We won the war! They put mayonnaise on their freedom fries! Their wimmins got hairy ‘pits!
Yea, was on a bullet train in China a few months ago— 350kph!!!
Didn’t we build bunch of grand infrastructure from the stimulus of 2009?
RE: More $timulus
Might be helpful iffin’ you relate it to
teencollegeadult sex, as in: Not enough.If Obama really wants to focus on job creation, he needs to focus on small to mid-sized businesses. Over time, they’ve been net job creators. OTOH, the big corps have been net job destroyers.
He should also consider the impressive growth of what are called non-employer businesses. Those are the one-man and one-woman bands you’ve heard so much about.
True, many of these people are involuntarily self-employed, but they’re still out there. And the numbers are heading up.
Make no mistake ,if Corporate America/Wall Street doesn’t like something ,it wont get passed . In fact anything that gets passed must benefit them /
The job-givers ,who aren’t really giving jobs ,but they are good at
using that as blackmail ploys . Liars
Tell the public they won’t get jobs unless Corporate America gets
the lions share of benefits and tax breaks . than of course they never deliever . Therefore ,tax breaks should only be given based on giving them after a Corporate America actually gives jobs and it can be
determined that they just didn’t fire a bunch of people just to re-hire them to get the tax break . Also more penalty taxes are in order .
You say this isn’t the American way . What is so American way about what Corporate America /Wall Street has been doing lately .
Tell the public they won’t get jobs unless Corporate America gets
the lions share of benefit$ and tax break$
Eyes hear ya HW! The choir singing, the congregations stompin’, Lordy! Amen!
Damn those in$ignificant, pe$ky, “can’t-afford-Lola-the-Lobbyi$t” “TruePeon$™” Bidne$$Gnats”
There’s “small” bidne$$, then there’s “micro” bidne$$, then there’s NOY-Bidne$$!
We interupt this revival meeting with an important me$$age from our $ponsor:
Cue Coca-Cola video on 1,2,3…:
“I like to teach / the world to $ing / in perfect harmony…”
“You say this isn’t the American way”
I certainly don’t. I get a raise after I’ve demonstrated superior performance, not before. Why should it be any different with Corps?
Funny how nobody is demostrating superior performance these
days and it can be rationized that nobody deserves a raise because a Foreigner can replace you .
The way of the past was that Employers gave cost of living increases . It just wasn’t the pattern to give cost of living going up decreases .
you might be getting raises ,because you either work for a
good Company or you truely are a superior employee that is not easy to replace ,even with foreigners
But ,i do agree with you that some income increases should be based on superior performance ,as well as advancements within a Company . Incentive for performance should come into play
no doubt .
as well as advancements within a Company
Which Company? [Ha!] they change owner$hip every 18 months!
A Huge Housing Bargain — but Not for You
By Roger Arnold
NEW YORK (RealMoney) — The largest transfer of wealth from the public to private sector is about to begin. The federal government will be bulk-selling the massive portfolio of foreclosed homes now owned by HUD, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to private investors — vulture funds.
These homes, which are now the property of the U.S. government, the U.S. taxpayer, U.S. citizens collectively, are going to be sold to private investor conglomerates at extraordinarily large discounts to real value.
You and I will not be allowed to participate. These investors will come from the private-equity and hedge-fund community, Goldman Sachs(GS_) and its derivatives, as well as foreign sovereign wealth funds that can bring a billion dollars or more to each transaction.
In the process, these investors will instantaneously become the largest improved real estate owners and landlords in the world. The U.S. taxpayer will get pennies on the dollar for these homes and then be allowed to rent them back at market rates.
On Wednesday, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Treasury Department issued a Request for Information (RFI) concerning the disposition of the inventory of foreclosed homes owned by the federal government.
An RFI is ostensibly a way for the federal government to get input from the private sector on how to accomplish the goals laid out in the request. But that’s really just a facade, as the RFI was structured by the investors to begin with.
In reality, the RFI is a way for the members of Congress to find out if they can get away with bulk-selling these homes to private companies without incurring the wrath of their constituents, taxpayers and former owners of the properties.
Assuming taxpayers don’t push back, the next step will be to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP). The RFP will be the bid and plan for these homes by investors.
The way to keep taxpayers from pushing back is to structure the RFI so that the real intention, the bulk sales, is masked by feel-good goals, such as stabilizing neighborhoods and increasing the supply of rental properties.
As intended, the mass media are playing their part in classic style. Every major newspaper in the U.S. has run articles discussing the plan as a rental conversion, allowing readers to assume that Fannie, Freddie and HUD will be renting the properties directly to families who need housing. And although there is an allowance for these kinds of rentals, it is a minor political facade to the obvious true goal of bulk-sale privatization of these homes.
The investors in this program have been waiting for this opportunity since the portfolio of homes owned by HUD began to spike in 2007, when foreclosures surged first in the “Rust Belt,” principally Ohio and Michigan.
The way to keep taxpayers from pushing back is to structure the RFI so that the real intention, the bulk sales, is masked by feel-good goals, such as stabilizing neighborhoods and increasing the supply of rental properties.
Here in Tucson, we already have a glut of rentals. What are we to do with even more of them?
If you know any Dem politician, might be a good time to use that connection to buy some of these houses dirt cheap.
If I had some money.
I have a friend who has a saying, “We could have ham and eggs, if we had some ham - if we had some eggs.”
I told youz guyz Repatriate the buck….sell a million McMansions to china.. for $50 billion…$50k each
90-year-old construction firm closing
By PAT KINNEY, pat.kinney@wcfcourier.com |August 24, 2011 1
WATERLOO — A 90-year-old construction company that built many of the buildings of Waterloo’s largest manufacturers and retail centers is closing.
Prairie Construction, the successor to Jens Olesen & Sons Co., one of Waterloo’s oldest construction businesses, is closing effective at the end of next month.
The announcement of the impending closure was made to its employees Friday.
“We had a stockholders meeting Thursday and developed a plan to dissolve the company,” Prairie President Mike Christiason said. “It’s been a pretty difficult economic climate in which to operate for a few years, so we decided this was the best direction for the company.”
Several options were considered.
“It’s a business decision. Not a business failure,” Christiason emphasized. “We will proceed with the work we have under contract and go about closing out the affairs of the company and meeting all the obligations to our clients currently under contract.”
That includes two high-profile downtown Waterloo projects: the Public Market building at the RiverLoop Expo plaza, and Riverfront Renaissance work on the west bank of the Cedar River between US Bank and the Waterloo Center for Arts.
“Most of our projects will be completed by the end of September,” Christiason said, when a company equipment and inventory auction is scheduled.
The company currently employs about 25 people. Prairie officials will do what they can to help them find other work, Christiason said.
Judging from how many of gold’s “worst days” have occurred in the wake of the onset of the financial panic, it seems likely gold has further upside potential from here until the panic eventually subsides.
Marketwatch dot com
Gold’s 10 worst days
August 24, 2011, 11:05 AM
Gold futures are falling sharply Wednesday, with the precious metal losing $86.30, or 4.6%, to trade at $1,775.50 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Analysts said the metal’s failure to top $1,900 an ounce appears to have marked a near term top given gold’s steady rally all year.
Still Wednesday’s sharp decline is a candidate for one of the metal’s worst days ever, in percentage losses.
The 10 worst days for gold, according to data compiled from FactSet Research:
-7.30 6/13/2006
-5.83 3/19/2008
-5.51 8/05/1993
-5.37 5/24/2006
-5.15 12/01/2008
-4.85 10/02/2008
-4.83 10/24/1997
-4.41 2/04/2010
-4.27 10/22/2008
-4.23 8/11/2008
-4.11 10/16/2008
-4.01 12/04/2009
-Tom Bemis
Here are some guesses about what else was going on at around these times.
-7.30 6/13/2006 Housing bubble pops
-5.83 3/19/2008 Bear Stearns collapses
-5.51 8/05/1993 ?
-5.37 5/24/2006 Housing bubble pops
-5.15 12/01/2008 Wall Street in a major meltdown
-4.85 10/02/2008 GSEs recently collapsed
-4.83 10/24/1997 Asian currency crisis
-4.41 2/04/2010 ?
-4.27 10/22/2008 GSEs recently collapsed
-4.23 8/11/2008 “Credit Crunch”
-4.11 10/16/2008 Credit still crunched
-4.01 12/04/2009 ?
“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth”.
– John Maynard Keynes – The Economic Consequences of the Peace
Ritz Interactive files for Chapter 11
Los Angeles Business from bizjournals
Ritz Interactive , the Irvine-based parent of Internet retailers RitzCamera.com, WolfCamera.com and BoatersWorld.com, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
According to the Orange County Register, the company had $2.4 million in sales in 1999, its first year of operations, and grew to $111 million in sales in 2007. But the company began to experience a revenue downturn in the second half of 2008 due to the U.S. economic recession.
In February 2009, Ritz’ primary supplier at the time, Ritz Camera Centers, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which hurt inventory availability, the Register reported, citing Ritz’ bankruptcy filing last Friday. Then camera manufacturer Canon U.S.A. Inc., whose product historically accounted for more than 15 percent of Ritz’ sales, refused to do business with Ritz after having lost significant funds in connection with the Ritz Camera Centers’ bankruptcy, the filing said.
In addition, Ritz Camera Centers liquidated its Boaters World stores and warehouse, and as a result, the Ritz lost its main supplier for Boatersworld.com, which in 2008 accounted for 13 percent of its sales.
All these factors caused Ritz to report operating losses in 2009, 2010 and year-to-date 2011, according to the filing.
I’m surprised that Ritz is still around. I thought they went under when they closed their retail storefronts.
Frivilous economic activity report from your man on the dock: While I was in Canada, there was no sign of any slump in the boating world. I was anchored out most of the time anyway. I’m back on the Erie Canal System and the popular tie up points are empty, empty, empty. Towns like Phoenix and Seneca Falls, which have primo “walls” w/ free electric and stuff…one other boat besides mine at both. These other boats were crewed by folks who’ve been retired for years, so I guess they didn’t get the memo. The wonderful gal who runs the Bridgehouse Brats in Phoenix told me that August has been dead. The weather has been great!
I did see a lot of the fishermen off Oswego trolling, so the meat eaters are still at it.
Odd to note, huge reduction in for sale signs along the way. No new construction since last year.
Henry Blodget vs. Bank of America: “Rotted to the Core”
By Aaron Task | Daily Ticker –
A major controversy has erupted in the blogosphere over the value of Bank of America’s balance sheet, and whether the bank will be forced to raise capital in the near future.
At the center of the debate is my colleague Henry Blodget, who touched off a maelstrom Tuesday with a blog that concluded Bank of America might need to raise up to $200 billion in capital.
“The trouble is that the market doesn’t believe Bank of America’s assets are worth anything close to what Bank of America says they are worth,” Henry writes, citing the following items other observers think should or will be subtracted from the bank’s $222 billion of book value:
$15-$20 billion in Increased mortgage-litigation reserves. Zero Hedge thinks BOFA is understating the liability for mortgage litigation costs by this amount. See explanation here.
Some percentage of $80 billion of “second mortgages.” Yves Smith thinks these should probably be written down by 60%, or $48 billion. You can pick your own number.
Some percentage of $47 billion in commercial real estate loans.* The “extend and pretend” game in commercial real-estate is even more pronounced than in residential real estate. So as Yves Smith observes, there’s almost no chance those loans are actually worth $47 billion. (UPDATE: Our original post said BOFA’s CRE exposure was $182 billion, which was a number cited by Yves Smith. BOFA said this number was off “by a factor of 4.” Yves has since rechecked the filings and realized that she made a mistake. I apologize for relaying it.)
A healthy percentage of $78 billion of “goodwill.” Bank of America built itself by acquisition. “Goodwill” is what’s left over when management overpays for something. As Yves Smith observes, Bank of America’s former CEO Ken Lewis loved overpaying for things. He overpaid for Countrywide, for example, which has since been written off to zero, and Merrill Lynch, which he could have had for free by waiting a couple more days.
Untold amounts of exposure to collapsing European banks and sovereign debt.* Yves Smith says Bank of America says its European exposure is $17 billion. (UPDATE: Bank of America issued a statement clarifying that its “sovereign” exposure–to the debt of PIIGS countries–is $1.7 billion. The overall European exposure is $17 billion. But the big concern here is not just sovereign exposure–debt of countries–but bank exposure. Along with the associated derivatives.) Really? Has the firm not written any credit default swaps protecting customers in the event that European banks or countries go belly up? Might the firm have to post some cash “collateral” to satisfy these contracts? That’s what Lehman had to do, after all. And that’s what made Lehman go from “having plenty of capital” to being broke overnight.
“The market also doesn’t believe that Bank of America has reserved anywhere near enough to pay the costs of litigation surrounding its mortgage behavior during the housing boom,” for which it has already paid $13 billion in settlements, Henry added.
Bank of America’s response was quick and ruthless: “Mr. Blodget is making ‘exaggerated and unwarranted claims’ which is what the SEC stated publicly when he was permanently banned from the securities industry in 2003,” the bank declared.
Henry Blodget vs. Bank of America sounds like that bout between the pot and the kettle.
Let’s $ummarize & expand:
“The trouble is that the market doesn’t believe
Bank of America’s[Insert Company name]:____________ a$$ets are worth anything close to whatBank of America[Insert Company name]:____________ says they are worth,”Now, we have a foundation for discu$$ion.
(Hwy reaches into misc. bit$ bucket, pulls out a scrap of paper): Toll Bro$
“Some percentage of $80 billion of “second mortgages.” Yves Smith thinks these should probably be written down by 60%, or $48 billion. You can pick your own number.”
“Under-water California Homeowners get some Much Needed Protection from Lenders with the passage of Senate Bill 458
August 22, 2011 - On July 15th, 2011, our Governor of California, Jerry Brown (much easier to spell then our previous Governor) signed Senate Bill 458, also known as SB458 that protects homeowners who are upside down on their homes from any junior lien holders from coming after the homeowner in the event of a short sale.”
So, in many cases BOA is the junior lien holder, Viola!
What will the Vatican do now?
vive la différence!
Sacre Bleu! Wealthy French Push for Higher Taxes, Warren Buffett Smiles
By Aaron Task | Daily Ticker – 3 hours ago
“It’s a sign of just how fast the political-economic climate is changing and also how much underlying social tensions there are, not just in the U.S.,” Tett says. “If there’s going to be a question of finite resources and allocating pain, there could be quite a nasty backlash against the rich.”
The top income tax rate in France is 40% and French citizens pay a 19.6% VAT sales tax, yet some of the country’s wealthiest individuals say they want to pay more.
“At a time when the government is asking everyone to show solidarity, we feel we must contribute,” 16 of the nation’s wealthiest individuals declared in an open letter published on the website of weekly magazine Le Nouvel Observateur.
“… we feel we must contribute …”
Blah, blah, blah. Words, words, words.
Talk is cheap. Money ain’t. They seem ready enough to let loose the words, let’s see how ready they are to let loose some cash.
My realtor was given the option of full-time exclusive agent for a luxury (yes, it’s really freakin’ luxurious) Gulf-front condo building, but he’d have to quit his $43k/yr teaching job.
He declined the listing.
Steve Jobs resigns as Apple CEO (finally!). Gold drops $100 and latest polls has Perry surging over Obama for 2012.
So long and thanks for all thee fish.
I’d be curious how the Cult of Steve (aka Apple) will do now. I’ve always thought that Apple was a *tad* too dependent on Steve Jobs.
OTOH, it seems to me that, despite all of the bashing that it gets, Microsoft seems to be rolling right along, even though Bill Gates is no longer the top guy.
latest polls has Perry surging over Obama for 2012.
Really?
Polls show Perry with broad lead over Romney [aka, lil' Opie]
August 24th, 2011 / by Martin Wisckol, Politics reporter
How to win
friendsseniors & Influence voters! by former cheerleader/yell-er Rick PerryPerry questions constitutionality of Social Security
Sad fact for Republicans: Romney may be electable in a national election, Perry is not. Unless all Americans decide to vote like anti-science Kansans, that is…
Jebster III looks like he is seriously is into barbi-q-ribs & the sauce! Porky’s revenge!
Romeny-Shrub III
Perry-Palin
Bachmann-Coulter
Hwy’s quasi-republican Senator gals in Maine must feel awfully
neglectedamused.TRENDING: Jeb Bush: ‘You can’t just be against the president’
By: CNN’s Megan Dougherty
(CNN) - Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush offered advice to 2012 Republican hopefuls: bashing President Barack Obama is not enough to win on the campaign trail.
“I hope that the Republican candidates, when they are offering their solutions, it’s good to be critical of the president, I think the president means well, but his policies have failed,” But just to stop there and say, ‘Well, I’m going to win because I am against what is going on’ is not enough.”
When asked by Fox News Host Neil Cavuto if some in his party overdo their criticism of Obama, Bush said, “I do. I think, when you start ascribing bad motives to the guy, I think that is wrong. It turns off a bunch of people that want solutions.”
You can’t just be against the president,” Bush said.
“I’m neutral in the presidential race, but I’m an admirer of Governor Romney’s,” Bush said, while noting he is looking forward to the unveiling of Romney’s jobs agenda in September.
Ha ha ha ha…the planet has gone topsy-turvey today!
I’m in a good mood, anyway. I was up wasting hand lotion most of the night last night, but I think it is out of my system for now. Looking forward to the big speech in Jackson Hole on Friday.
Got popcorn?
GlenBeckinstan Speaketh!
Glenn Beck boasts ‘courage’ at Israel rally:
By Joe Pompeo | The Cutline 8/24/2011
Israeli religious and political figures both on the left and right came out against the rally, presumably as a reaction to Beck’s track record of controversial remarks. There was even a Facebook page called “Glenn Beck Stay Home” created in protest.
But in the end, 1,700 supporters showed for the sold-out event, and an additional 3,000 gathered at a nearby viewing station where it was beamed in live, a spokesman for Beck told The Cutline. The Guardian, among others, contested those figures, reporting a “surprising number of empty seats belied the organisers’ claims that demand for tickets had outstripped availability.” Many of the attendees were evangelical Christians from the United States, according to reports.
“In Israel, there is more courage in one square mile than in all of Europe,” Beck said in his keynote address. The event, titled “Restoring Courage,” was billed as a rally to declare support for the Jewish state.
“In Israel,” Beck continued, “there is more courage in one soldier than in the combined and cold hearts of every bureaucrat at the United Nations. No country is perfect. But it tries, and it is courageous. Today, the world needs courage more than ever.”
“In Israel, there is more courage in one square mile than in all of Europe,” Beck said in his keynote address. The event, titled “Restoring Courage,” was billed as a rally to declare support for the Jewish state.
It’s also one of the rudest countries on this planet. Seriously, if you’re looking for kindness and hospitality, go to any Arab country.
Completely off topic for the AZ crowd. We live between Surprise and Wickenburg on 2.5 acres in the desert. We have rescue dogs, one of which is a bloodhound found lost in the desert by my wife. A great dog, as this is her property and anything that comes close sets her off. So, this am while getting ready for work I hear her high pitched howl which I heard once before when she located a rattlesnake in the back. Since we have a new puppy, the last thing we need is a snake bite (all the dogs get vaccinated for rattlesnake just in case). Turns out she had targeted a scorpion the size of my fist and was keeping a safe distance while sounding the alert. I am glad she was brought into our life! Besides that, she is just plain cute. Just another day in the desert.
Just wanted to thank everyone who stepped forward to offer their support today. Yes, I know. I made a dumb mistake and bought life insurance that I don’t need. Or want.
I’m going to be seeing my attorney tomorrow afternoon to find out what my legal rights are. So, if you don’t see much verbiage from me tomorrow, it’ll be because I’m getting ready for the attorney meeting — and taking part in it.
Thanks again to this wonderful community!
Best of luck getting out of it, Slim…
BTW, some states have “cold feet” laws that let you get out of a purchase within so many days if you were approached either door-to-door or via phone-solicitation.
I believe some states even have more specific laws regarding insurance–e.g. you have so many days to review the policy after purchase, and you can back out if you don’t likeit.
It totally depends on the state law, but it is worth asking whether your state has any of these sorts of provisions. It may depends on whether they contacted you, or vice-versa.
The CME agrees with my humble opinion that gold has entered a parabolic bubble price blowout phase. Once prices have gone quasi-exponential, watch out below, folks!
CME raises gold margin requirements again
August 24, 2011, 5:17 PM
For the second time this month, the CME Group Inc., the parent company of the main metals and energy exchanges in the U.S., announced late Wednesday an increase in margin requirements to trade gold. It raised the amount of money needed to trade gold contracts by 27% to $9,450 per 100-ounce contract.
The move comes on the heels of a $104-an-ounce drop in gold futures prices, which some analysts had blamed partly on speculation that the CME would raise margin requirement again.
Gold’s approach to $2,000 an ounce “invited excess speculation and therefore margin concerns for exchanges,” said Richard Hastings, a macro strategist at Global Hunter Securities. “The quasi-exponential price behavior was dangerous and the exchanges today view this with significant concern — and act quickly.”
…