September 7, 2011

Something Was Bound To Go Horribly Wrong

The Worcester Business Journal reports from Massachusetts. “Foreclosure activity started to pick up again in July, according to the latest numbers from the Warren Group. Currently, Worcester County contains more communities with high rates of homes either owned by banks or in foreclosure (also known as “distressed” homes) than any other Bay State county, according to an analysis by the Massachusetts Housing Partnership. Winchendon, North Brookfield, Athol, Fitchburg, Ashburnham, Worcester, Warren, Hardwick and Leicester all made the list of the top 20 most distressed communities in the state.”

“Rick Healey, president of Foster-Healey Real Estate in Leominster, agreed that foreclosures have affected sale prices in North Central Massachusetts. ‘Does it have an impact on the market and will it continue to have an impact on the market? Yes it will, in terms of keeping prices from appreciating,’ Healey said.”

“The silver lining for real estate agents, he said, is that people who are employed have been taking advantage of lower prices and interest rates as low as three to four percent. ‘That’s almost free money,’ he said.”

The Kennebec Journal in Maine. “The Choates’ home on Bassett Road has been foreclosed on before. Shari Gregory, a neighbor, said in her 16 years living on the road, there have been four owners. The neighborhood is desirable, Gregory said. If the Choates lost their home to foreclosure, she said, another family would likely move in. Gregory, who called herself a liberal Democrat, said though the government can’t bail out all homeowners who overextend themselves, those in trouble need aid.”

“‘I can understand it’s hard in this economy,’ she said. ‘Yeah, they deserve some help.’”

“Achieva Home Loans Inc representatives told the Choates in May 2006 they were eligible for an adjustable rate loan with a 9.25 interest rate for the first two years, with no money down. Because they were buying a house for less than appraised market value, the representative said they would be eligible for a 30-year fixed loan, dropping the interest rate to 3.5 percent after a year, because of the equity in the home. ‘The reason I fell for it, I guess, was he said because I paid so much less than what the house was worth, that we would have enough equity in our house to qualify for a lower interest rate,’ Lynne Choate said.”

“That loan, with easing terms, never materialized. Instead, rates went up. In September 2006, Massachusetts shut down Achieva and 10 other mortgage firms after investigators determined ‘brokers steered prospective home buyers into mortgages they couldn’t afford, and lenders looked the other way,’ according to published reports.”

“The Choates’ phone calls and letters now come from Litton Loan Servicing. Documents show Litton — an arm of investment giant Goldman Sachs until earlier this summer — has received its own federal bailout. Documents show it has been given $50.6 million under the Making Home Affordable program since 2007. According to a Bloomberg News report, Litton had about $41.2 billion in unpaid principal mortgage balances as of March 31.”

The Brooklyn Daily Eagle in New York. “Home sales are slow but prices are holding steady, according to the New York City Quarterly Housing Update (Q2 2011) released last week by NYU’s Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy. Overall home sales volume declined 20 percent from the first to the second quarter of 2011, and is down 40 percent compared to the same period in 2010.”

“However, home prices increased citywide by about 6 percent from the first quarter to the second quarter of 2011, although they remain 21 percent below their peak in the fourth quarter of 2006, according to the report. In Brooklyn, home prices increased nearly 8 percent in the last quarter, but are still 24 percent lower than their peak.”

“In Manhattan, homes appreciated roughly 4 percent in the last quarter, and are now only 7 percent below their peak values. ‘We saw fewer foreclosure notices in this quarter than we did in the same quarter of 2010,’ said Ingrid Gould Ellen, faculty co-director of the Furman Center. ‘Yet, nearly 7,000 households were newly affected by a foreclosure notice in the second quarter of 2011 and nearly 3,100 of those households were in Brooklyn.’ Additionally, 52 percent of new foreclosure notices in the last quarter were issued to two to four family homes, mostly concentrated in Brooklyn and Queens.”

The Star. “Bob Wilmers, CEO of Buffalo’s venerable M&T Bank Corp for 27 years, ran M&T like its prudent Canadian counterparts until it mattered. Like so many of the world’s largest financial institutions in the mid-2000s, M&T gave in to peer pressure and criticism from securities analysts that it was unduly risk-averse.M&T accelerated its writing of ‘Alt-A’ mortgages, just a notch above subprime or junk mortgages, to borrowers of doubtful creditworthiness. M&T also bought $131.7 million worth of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) from Deutsche Bank AG.”

“And M&T took a 20 per cent stake in Bayview Lending Group, a Miami-based commercial mortgage lender. The Buffalo bank was soon heavily exposed in Florida, California and Arizona. Just 15 per cent of M&T’s loan book was in those three states, but they account for half the bank’s writeoffs since 2007. In the mid-2000s, ‘we were looking pretty mediocre,’ Wilmers says, compared with spectacular gains posted by fellow regionals.”

“I ask Wilmers how could he sign off on the ill-fated CDO purchases, given his history of extricating the then-troubled M&T from exotic foreign loans. ‘I just wasn’t focused,’ he allows. ‘I had papers in front of me that said these were triple A- and double A-rated mortgages, which we fully expected to promptly resell. In hindsight, the shame of it is that our treasurer was proposing these CDOs as a means of squeezing an extra 0.25 per cent return over our customary investments. And we got left holding the bag.’”

“Like so many of his fellow bank CEOs, Wilmers says he didn’t know what either CDOs or the recent Wall Street ‘innovation’ of Alt-A mortgages were. Eyes rolled later when the music stopped and, failing to find a buyer for M&T’s unsuitable loans, Wilmers asked colleagues if the CDOs could be opened to see if there was something salvageable.”

“‘There was a long silence,’ Wilmers recalls, ‘until someone said, ‘Bob, there are 486,000 mortgages in this thing. It would take years to sort them out.’”

“It shouldn’t take hindsight to grasp something was bound to go horribly wrong when Japanese university endowment funds were holding mortgages on four-bedroom ’starter’ homes in Phoenix, and lenders in Charlotte were financing the debt of Greece. ‘You’re much less likely to do dumb things when you stick with the fundamentals of knowing your borrowers and their employees, suppliers and customers,’ Wilmers says. ‘Banking is not that difficult, you know.’”




RSS feed

28 Comments »

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-07 08:03:29

“Rick Healey, president of Foster-Healey Real Estate in Leominster, agreed that foreclosures have affected sale prices in North Central Massachusetts. ‘Does it have an impact on the market and will it continue to have an impact on the market? Yes it will, in terms of keeping prices from appreciating,’
————————————————————————–

Hey moron….. did the thought ever occur to you that inflated prices mean fewer sales?

Realtors are idiots.

Comment by BetterRenter
2011-09-08 20:15:26

Realtors are idiots.

No, realtors are drug pushers. Like all such pushers, they really can’t resist trying a bit of their product. I don’t know, but I would just bet that realtors are far more likely to fall into foreclosure than anyone else.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-09-07 08:34:03

It’s interesting to watch history be re-written and twisted. From the KJ piece:

‘Before the housing bubble burst, home prices in the nation were rising dramatically — fueling demand for larger loans, even for borrowers with shaky credit.’

So which was it, prices fueled demand for loans or loans fueled prices? Does the media not remember how great these “affordability products” were considered back then, and how Angelo Mozillo was praised as a saint for helping people “get into a home”?

‘Housing market watchers identify two waves of foreclosures — the one that set off the market bust from 2006 to 2009; and one that lingers now in a fitful economic recovery.’

“The first wave in this country was due to predatory lending,” Fields said. “The current situation — we’re looking at people who, through no fault of their own, have extended periods of unemployment.”

See, there is the villain and the innocent rest of us again. No greedy buyers/sellers, appraisers or UHS. They even throw in Goldman Sachs and mention “bail-out”.

But here’s something I found this morning:

‘The number of foreclosure petitions filed in Berkshire County last month is double the amount that were initiated in July 2010, according to Middle Berkshire Registry of Deeds Andrea F. Nuciforo Jr., although an organization that follows the state housing market claims the numbers have actually gone down.’

‘Personal income in Berkshire County is at the same level it was in 2008, according to the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis, while families in the bottom fifth of the income scale in Western Massachusetts have seen inflation-adjusted earnings drop below 1979 levels, according to a recent study by two University of Massachusetts economists.’

Gee, I wonder why these people can’t “snap up” houses with 1979 incomes?

Comment by Steve J
2011-09-07 11:24:35

Seems like the bottom 5th are not going to be buying houses for a long time, if ever.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-07 12:03:06

Gee, I wonder why these people can’t “snap up” houses with 1979 incomes?

All that’s needed is 1979 prices.

Comment by b-hamster
2011-09-07 13:43:23

…not to merntion that the square footage of homes doubled since 1970. On a similar note, I read that the square footage of retail space per capita doubled since 1980.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-07 16:43:40

“So which was it, prices fueled demand for loans or loans fueled prices?”

Affordability products fueled unaffordable prices for all except for those who didn’t mind signing their financial future away to a future foreclosure.

 
 
Comment by Patrick
2011-09-07 08:55:44

M&T was always an icon in the Niagara Frontier. It took the dive for .025 times 486,000 mortgages ! On an average 200m mtge that would be 25 million extra profit. Probably double their normal.

Greed.

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-09-07 09:04:52

Yeah, but it also raises the issue of artificially low interest rates, where everybody is chasing yield. At least this CEO is sorta honest about the whole thing.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-09-07 10:08:57

Speaking of being sorta honest, I like this quote from the story:

“It shouldn’t take hindsight to grasp something was bound to go horribly wrong when Japanese university endowment funds were holding mortgages on four-bedroom ’starter’ homes in Phoenix, and lenders in Charlotte were financing the debt of Greece. ‘You’re much less likely to do dumb things when you stick with the fundamentals of knowing your borrowers and their employees, suppliers and customers,’ Wilmers says. ‘Banking is not that difficult, you know.’”

 
Comment by Eggman
2011-09-07 11:21:30

I remember a quote (kinda) from a guy who ran a feeder fund for the Madoff fund. He said that people would do _anything_ for another percentage point of yield. That was much of what was behind Madoff’s success.

I don’t understand why people characterize the desire for good ROI as being ‘greed’. I can see stupid, and i can see risky, but the desire to maximize return is normal, isn’t it?

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-09-07 11:49:58

Well, right, who doesn’t want to earn the best return on their savings? What I’m referring to is the central bank keeping rates low. (You can make the case that doesn’t effect long term rates). Greenspan was accused of this. The current Fed is doing much the same thing, openly trying to drive people into the stock market by buying treasuries.

I wonder if this bank would have been buying into these CDOs if the Fed funds rate hadn’t been so low?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Steamed Bean
2011-09-07 11:21:47

They did it for alot less than that. Article says they bought $130 million of CDOs with yields 25 basis points higher. That works out to an extra $325k of income annually (130,000,000 X .0025).

 
 
Comment by trainwreck
2011-09-07 09:45:58

But they were rated AAA! That was the hook.

 
Comment by JohnF
2011-09-07 09:51:45

“The silver lining for real estate agents, he said, is that people who are employed have been taking advantage of lower prices and interest rates as low as three to four percent. ‘That’s almost free money,’ he said.”

Free money…….except for that loan balance you have to pay off for the next 30 years….

Comment by 2banana
2011-09-07 10:34:13

Free money - like what they USED to call home equity loans…

Comment by JohnF
2011-09-07 11:36:14

Hey……they were only spending what their house had “earned” for them…….

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-07 10:38:38

Gregory, who called herself a liberal Democrat, said though the government can’t bail out all homeowners who overextend themselves, those in trouble need aid.”

The BEST way to help these people is NOT with another government handout.

The best way would be show them HOW to declare bankruptcy - wipe the slate clean - and start over.

Then HOW to live below your means.

Then if and when you THINK you can buy another house - 20% down and no more than 2.5x annual income.

But this way would be cruel and heartless to the libs. Quick - let’s throw out another $300 billion out of helicopters…

 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-07 10:43:02

“Like so many of his fellow bank CEOs, Wilmers says he didn’t know what either CDOs or the recent Wall Street ‘innovation’ of Alt-A mortgages were. Eyes rolled later when the music stopped and, failing to find a buyer for M&T’s unsuitable loans, Wilmers asked colleagues if the CDOs could be opened to see if there was something salvageable.”

“‘There was a long silence,’ Wilmers recalls, ‘until someone said, ‘Bob, there are 486,000 mortgages in this thing. It would take years to sort them out.’”

You and your fellow bank CEOs should be in jail. All salary and bonuses from 2002 should be clawed back. And you should be forced to walk through the streets with a sign that reads “I am a greedy fool and I lost all your money.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-09-07 10:48:19

I like your anger!

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-09-07 11:36:52

“It also raises the issue of artificially low interest rates, where everybody is chasing yield.”

My impression is that unlike the mid-2000s, no one is chasing despite artificially low interest rates. This time is different!

Comment by Patrick
2011-09-07 12:33:03

WT

Right on. First you look at who is the holder of your funds and check them out very carefully. Equities, assets, deposits - whatever. We always did this - but today we now laugh at higher than normal yields.

Of course we could all invest (gamble) in Greece !

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-07 23:21:33

“Of course we could all invest (gamble) in Greece !”

I had a fantasy (perhaps it was a dream) a couple of days (nights?) back about quitting my job, moving to Vegas, and setting up a gambling casino whose focus was strictly financial bets. For instance, a fella could go there and take either side of the bet that Greece will default on its debt within X period of years. The house would take a cut, of course, but anyone who had a strong conviction either in favor of or against a Greek default would have a place to satisfy their urge to gamble.

Would this be legal?

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2011-09-08 10:28:06

I have a certain amount of money in a junk bond fund paying over 8%. But I KNOW it’s a junk bond fund - even the ticker symbol is “JNK”. LOL. Truth in advertising.

 
 
Comment by doom
2011-09-07 15:04:48

Banks continue this cat and mouse shell game at real homeowners expense, they hold back foreclosure and tell the public they don’t want to flood the market and drop prices even more.

What a joke, anybody can see that they put inventory on the market at their whim and still price it below comps of your neighborhood thus you have people not paying a mortage, taxes, and HOA dues. Then the banks buy the house at auction they then low ball the price for a quick sale all along they make you think this is all for your good and for the value of your home???

The foreclosure folks got away with no payments for a year or two and you also get the shaft from the bank, so much for doing the right thing in your life, very nice!

 
Comment by DennisN
2011-09-08 10:40:12

There really is a town in MA called “Athol”? Is it pronounced like a vulgar word spoken by a guy with a speech impediment?

Comment by Eugene
2011-09-08 13:55:19

Yep. It’s really “Athol”. But it’s pronounced more like “ath haul” than the other way.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-08 14:24:07

Maybe you’re thinking of Mathol?

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post