September 17, 2011

Bits Bucket for September 17, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

256 Comments »

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 04:42:05

It appears the central bank bailout liquidity fire hose is running on high blast yet again, in an effort to put out the Eurozone debt crisis inferno. Should we anticipated record 2012 profits for systemically important Megabanks?

Which conditions (given in the IMF paper I have linked below) to make Emergency Liquidity Financing (ELF) available in the situation at hand are met, and which are not? The situation hardly meets the “nobody could have seen it coming” criterion (the fourth point in the list).

IMF LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND IMF INSTITUTE SEMINAR ON
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MONETARY AND FINANCIAL LAW
May 7 – 17, 2002
Emergency Liquidity Financing by Central Banks:
Systemic Protection or Bank Bailout?
Ross S. Delston and Andrew Campbell

I. Introduction

The aim of this paper is to consider the ways in which emergency liquidity funding (“ELF”) may be provided by central banks to individual banks that are experiencing financial difficulties. ELF takes the form of loans from, or guarantees by, the central bank that are designed to assist one or more commercial banks that are either undergoing a run on deposits as a result of concerns about safety and soundness or that are experiencing a systemic financial crisis.

By way of background, the fundamental principles of this type of assistance are relevant.

First, ELF should be given by the central bank only to banks which are illiquid and not insolvent.

Second, the loan or other financing should be subject to a penalty rate of interest.

Third, collateral (or security) should be provided.

Fourth, its use must be discretionary and there should be no expectation that such help will be available. It has also been described as “the discretionary provision of liquidity to a financial institution (or the market as a whole) by the central bank in reaction to an adverse shock which causes an abnormal increase in demand for liquidity which cannot be met from an alternative source.”

Comment by dude
2011-09-17 06:52:42

This globalization thing is really taking a nasty turn for the worse.

 
Comment by frankie
2011-09-17 07:06:24

I think we are ………………

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7RIgs3eygo

Comment by Martin
2011-09-17 10:23:58

And any news about the massive movement today at Wall Street about people protesting Egypt style against the bankers?

They are expecting a turnout of 90K.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:29:41

A 100,000 Man March for white guys?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-09-17 19:47:24

If any banking executive suffers the loss of even a cent of profit, the terrorists have won.

 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2011-09-17 04:43:21

Rent now or be priced out….

Report: Boston office rents to rise on white-collar hiring

Boston firms are expected to expand their office-worker head counts in the second half of the year, according to real estate industry research published Friday by national commercial real estate brokerage Marcus & Millichap Marcus & Millichap. The third-quarter report predicts 22,000 new white-collar jobs in Boston in 2011, a 2 percent increase that will return the Hub to its 2007 employment levels.

Established office districts like the Back Bay, Fenway and Boston’s central business district will likely see the most benefit, as tenants fill up discounted Class A space – but space won’t be plentiful for long, the report predicts. By the end of the year, Marcus & Millichap expects increased demand will give owners leverage to raise rents and cut concessions.

http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2011/09/16/hiring-fuels-boston-office-market.html

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-17 06:50:09

Supply and demand. “Space won’t be plentiful for long.”

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 07:15:43

Supply and demand. “Demand won’t be there for long.”

~Realtors Are Liars®

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:11:13

Demand is dead as a doornail, despite record low mortgage rates.

CIBT

(Comments wont nest below this level)
2011-09-17 12:16:09

Demand is going to be dead as a doornail until population growth catches up.

Then, everyone will declare “victory”.

Unfortunately, the houses are in the wrong places compared to what is needed in the future.

I’m going to channel my inner 12-year old, “Yay, victory!!!”

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-09-17 07:36:02

They don’t plan for Boston to get hit by banking sector contractions?

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-09-17 07:37:05

And the driving force for this supposed trend is what? The recovering economy? Everybody wants to move to Boston?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 04:48:02

The Fed certainly does seem to be making great strides these days towards increasing transparency in its operations.

Why didn’t the Fed release a statement on the dollar liquidity bailout?
Sep 16, 2011 18:00 EDT

Felix here. I’m about to head out of town for a couple of weeks, on a mini European tour. I’ll try to check in occasionally, but I’m not sure how often that’ll be, so I’m experimenting with guest postings. With any luck, there’ll be some fabulous stuff coming up from Mark Dow and Barbara Kiviat. But also, I’m trying to take advantage of all the great blog posts that Ryan McCarthy is finding as he edits Counterparties. The idea is that if we find something wonderful, we’ll ask if we can reprint it, while linking back to the original. Edward Harrison has already said yes, so here’s his post today on the Fed. Enjoy!

By Edward Harrison

Overnight, a group of us were exchanging e-mails on the recent coordinated central bank action to provide European banks the funding being denied them by the markets. I haven’t been active on the e-mail chain, but I did find some of the commentary interesting.

I had a few comments of note I wanted to address, but here’s why I am writing this post:

See NYT report which says clearly that the Fed did nothing to cooperate since the swap was already in place and would make no statement.

When I read that I realised it was true. Look at the post yesterday from the BoE, “Additional US dollar liquidity-providing operations over year-end”. At the end of that press release, there is a link to the statement of every other central bank participating in the liquidity measure… except the Fed. In fact, I was looking for the Fed statement yesterday and didn’t find it. And that’s when I went to the BoE and saw they linked out to the other CB statements (sans Fed).

I think this is curious messaging because the US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is over in Europe right now banging the table about the need for a Euro TARP. Cullen Roche calls it a Euro TALF. Whatever you call it, its a bailout; the original TALF sure was. Is this why the Fed went all radio silent?

I think that’s it exactly. The last post I wrote on The European Bank Bailout talks a lot about how unpopular these bailouts are; and since this is effectively a backdoor bank bailout, it makes sense that Ben Bernanke would want to keep mum, “to keep his powder dry” for QE3 as one of my friends e-mailed.

Comment by dude
2011-09-17 07:01:12

Good find GS.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 04:50:07

Crisis bailout Grand Kabuki dance in progress; record investment bank profits soon to follow.

FTSE boosted by central bank manoeuvres
Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:55am EDT
By Tricia Wright

LONDON, Sept 16 (Reuters) - Britain’s FTSE nosed higher on Friday, lifted by coordinated action from global central banks and hopes the euro zone would boost its bailout fund as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and European finance ministers prepared to meet.

 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-17 04:50:45

What is this difference from what this guy did to GS, JPM, Chase, etc.

———————————

KC man who created his own bank found guilty of fraud
Kansas City Star | Wed, Sep. 14,

A Kansas City man who marketed and sold $100 million in worthless financial documents was found guilty of multiple federal fraud charges Wednesday.

Denny Ray Hardin, 52, who ran the Private Bank of Denny Ray Hardin out of his home, was convicted of 11 counts of creating fictitious obligations and 10 counts of mail fraud. A judge found him guilty after a three-day trial in U.S. District Court in Kansas City.

According to trial testimony, Hardin used his home computer to produce more than 2,000 “bonded promissory notes,” which he claimed were backed by a U.S. Treasury Department account and could be used to pay off debts. Hardin charged a fee to purchase the notes, which he claimed he was authorized to sell because he was a private banker.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 06:50:26

He did not have the backing of a Treasury Department account, which made his claimed bank a fraud.

Next…

 
Comment by ecofeco
2011-09-17 15:36:49

$100… MILLION?

100 million?

That’s a lot of suckers. Damn!

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-09-17 18:08:38

Well, who wouldn’t trust something called the ‘Private Bank of Denny Ray Hardin’?

 
 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2011-09-17 04:51:44

Worker bees will see none of it…

Twitter Inc. gets green light to expand restricted stock awards

Social media company Twitter Inc. has been ramping up its restricted stock awards to employees and this week secured a no-action letter from the Securities Exchange Commission that says the company does not have to register the securities.

An Aug. 23 letter on Twitter’s behalf from law firm Fenwick & West LLP Fenwick & West LLP said Twitter has recently begun to grant restricted stock units to employees as part of their compensation. And in the future, Twitter may grant the restricted stock to directors and consultants, too

http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2011/09/16/twitter-restricted-stock-awards.html

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-17 06:56:01

They’ll see none of it if the stock price crashes before the earliest sell date. Otherwise it’s AOL all over again (almost-millionaire secretaries) but probably on a lesser scale.

My advice to employees: Sell the shares as soon as you can.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-17 05:00:46

No spinning this.

Obama is toxic. His policies are toxic. 2012 is going to be a landslide.

And just wait until NYC housing prices really start heading into the toilet. They are only down (maybe) 10-15% off peak

———————————

I was sunk by Obama: Weprin
NYPost with AP | Sept. 16, 201i | CARL CAMPANILE

Democrat David Weprin said yesterday that President Obama’s sagging popularity among Queens and Brooklyn voters cost him the election for ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner’s congressional seat.

In a stunning upset, Weprin was trounced by Republican Bob Turner, whose campaign had tied him to the president.

“The message of the campaign was ‘Send Obama a message,’ ” said Weprin, a Queens state assemblyman. “I think the problem was that he’s the president and people are frustrated, and it’s just natural to take it out on the top guy — or the top guy’s party.

Democrats outnumber Republicans 3 to 1 in the district.

During one press conference, Weprin refused to say whether he backed Obama’s re-election. In fact, he did not mention the president in his literature, nor did he seek Obama’s endorsement.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 06:49:28

Seems to me that his policies are mostly a continuation of what was being done before. In that regard he has been a disappointment.

Yeah, people are frustrated. They were expecting him to wave his magic wand and undo 40 years of damage. Instead were gonna get 4 more years of the same old broken policies: deficit spending, trade deficits, offshoring, bailouts for the rich, etc.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 06:53:08

“And just wait until NYC housing prices really start heading into the toilet.”

I can’t wait.

But could you spare us the knee-jerk RNC anti-Obama rhetoric, pleaze? I’m sure there are RNC-supported blogs which would luv to have your insights.

Comment by bigguy
2011-09-17 09:37:57

Yeah this is DNC only here! (Apologies to Ben)

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 09:54:51

I am not a Democrat or a DNC member.

I do confess to taking perverse pleasure in tugging on RNC trolls’ chains. The only reason I don’t give DNC trolls equal harassment is that I find their positions so annoying I don’t want to encourage further posts from them here than already happens. And perhaps also because they seem less retarded.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 09:56:38

Whacked.

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:05:38

DNC troll seems defensive

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-09-17 11:59:46

I think what Prof is saying here is that we can get recycled partisan claptrap anywhere, but we come to this board for insight and original analysis. (Emphasis on “original.”)

As you’ve pointed out, evil, in some of your own excellent posts, this sort of be-pimpled adolescent baiting is both intellectually offensive and unworthy of the audience.

And a waste of Ben’s bandwidth.

As for the relative demerits, a mere googling of the phraseology will quickly tell us which “NC” is the more frequently represented among the guilty….

 
Comment by bigguy
2011-09-17 18:17:02

They’re all crooked but CIBTH has been RNC paranoid ever since the Wisconsin drubbing, and even more of late. Too bad, he does a good service posting good links and I support him for it. But enuf of the carrying of the BO water.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 19:30:04

“They’re all crooked but CIBTH has been RNC paranoid ever since the Wisconsin drubbing, and even more of late.”

Sorry I can’t get as excited as you enlightened guys are over the American politicians who bear the closest resemblance so far to Der Führer.

 
 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:04:35

DNC troll alert.

Sigh

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:36:45

RNC copy cat alert

Hurl

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-09-17 11:35:22

Thanks for the alerts guys, but I am well-read enough to know it is all statist BS. democrats Wang to kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Wealthy democrats want to raise the drawbridge to prevent new entrepreneurs from becoming wealthy. That is all Warren Buffet. He wants to use the State to stop you and I from achieving what he achieved.

republicans want to stop me, a single man, from having sex outside of marriage. They want to cram the crap of their wierd spaghetti monster ideas down my throat. They want to enslave pregnant women until they give birth.

Less than five percent of Americans are peaceful to each other. Less than five percent of Americans think it is wrong to violate another’s property rights and civil liberties.

There. Statists suck. That is 95% of Americans (judging by percentage who vote for statists).

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-09-17 13:30:05

I suppose your respect for the sanctity of private property leads you to call for the return of America to the Indians?

And it follows that all the money we’ve made here really belongs to them too. So I guess they get your retirement savings, Bill.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2011-09-17 14:01:01

So there are currently large numbers of Americans accumulating fortunes similar in size to Warrne Buffet’s on a regular basis? I don’t think that that is happening.

Also, if 95% of Americans suck, is there a better country that you can move to?

 
Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-09-17 14:03:26

I am part American Indian. Your words here are gibberish. So what about the peoples my Indian ancestors conquered on their journey across the Bering Strait? We can go to ridiculous endless chains. One thing for sure is that objective property law was “recently” developed in the last 400 years.

But you commies are hypocrites anyway since you pretend to worry about my ancestors dozens of years before I was born but you are opposed to our property rights today.

I won’t pay for what some of my ancestors did to my Indian ancestors. Start writing your own checks alpha. Get in the hypocrite line next to Warren Buffet.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-09-17 16:09:48

“But you commies are hypocrites anyway ”

Like the guy who claims to be all about the sanctity of property rights, but then says they only started when he says they started? And the people who possessed the property earlier, that we ran off with guns, are SOL?

Now pay your taxes like a good little property thief, and can the moralizing. You owe your upbringing to FDR anyway, now it’s time to pay it back.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-17 07:02:30

I just finished reading the Saturday WSJ, and in the entire front section there was only ONE mention of the president, either by name or “the president” or even “the White House.” That was in Peggy Noonan’s opinion column. He’s temporarily gone AWOL, perhaps nursing his Low T or other form of depression (per NYT article coming tomorrow).

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-09-17 13:25:08

Who owns the WSJ?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 13:59:33

A proud Aussie American with a perpetual MUD stick.

$tir, $tir, $tir… ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 07:02:38

Apparently Congress is even less popular than the prez …

http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_18914371

Approval rating of Congress at record-low of 12 percent

 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-09-17 07:25:17

2banana
The Republicans are no win for the middle class either. Both parties are nfg.

Can we all chill on the political discourse today.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:57:04

I promise not to bring it up again unless RNC trolls show their heads, in which case I plan to play whack-a-troll.

Comment by Awaiting
2011-09-17 08:24:17

Cantankerous - whack-a-troll would then be well deserved and applauded .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:06:46

DNC troll alert.

Sigh.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 07:51:50

“I think the problem was that he’s the president and people are frustrated

Cheney-$hub Shadow Legacy Rea$on A#1: :-)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YWn2qsk7PhY/TWPmMcm7XBI/AAAAAAAABz4/Ptpt7l3paVI/s1600/9-8-War-Profiteering.jpg

Stay Focu$eD on the Root Cause$ $lippery$plitBanana!

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:03:30

—And just wait until NYC housing prices really start heading into the toilet. They are only down (maybe) 10-15% off peak—-

Yeah, we’ve had this chat here of late. Rents are up not down… so it goes. And sales prices might be down as cited generally, but in my UWS stomping grounds are not down (by my anecdote) for 1-2bdrm. Still the $4900 rent is better than paying $1.4 million to buy similar place.

2011-09-17 10:54:16

The most desirable areas rise first, fall last.

It’s fairly obvious why that should be (if you understand the credit cycle, and the fact that “affluent people” have resources to hold on.)

Pacific Heights fell by an insane 50% last time in 1993. Park Ave. fell by 35-40%.

Would you care to argue that this time is different?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:02:07

Could it be that he lacks the “vision thing,” especially since it is taking much longer than expected for housing prices to revert to the mean in the face of unprecedented federal government efforts to prop them up on a permanently-high plateau?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
2011-09-17 11:19:45

One doesn’t need “vision”. One simply needs to compare rents (which track incomes) v/s “wishing prices” (which currently do not.)

Rents track incomes. House prices track incomes in the long term.

Memorize this. Repeat it endlessly until you actually “get it”.

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:26:56

Yeah, maybe I should keep changing my name here to prove I have “vision”.

Or you are just a wee troll. Weird, I hadn’t thought of trolls online for years, until you started tossing the phrase around for those who outargue you or about those with whom you simply disagree. Charming.

Figuring I knew about the housing bubble by 2004, I figure I have at least enough of the vision thing to scuttle through.

And, with most of the gov’t efforts to prop the economy (not so much to prop housing, per se) funneling through NYC, Manhattan certainly has managed a ridiculously high plateau, though one would expect that even monstrous plateaus eventually reach the ledge before the next valley.

The “charm” of Manhattan’s plateau — such as it– , which no doubt must crash due to underlying economic principles “ownership vs rent ratios”, “house price to income ratios” and all dat dere fun stuff, is that it takes a real toll on those who are reasonable. If 1999 prices are reached again in 2019 instead of 2007 as with Tucson, many of us (eep! philosophy violation alert!) will have effectively been priced out of the market for the period of our lives that matters for crapshack buying. Who knew the realturds might’ve been right. ;)

FPSS asked “Would you care to argue that this time is different?”

A very good question and one less simple than it appears. Perhaps… no “Time” is “Different” when we use capital letters. But “most times are different” when we use small letters and when we compare each time to every other time. Always there are nuances. The nuances are the killer. My assertion would be that NYC cannot forever violate core economic tenets of housing. NYC is not “Different”, but Manhattan certainly is different (small letter- “d”) in the slope, rate, time course, etc of events from, say, Miami Florida.

How’s the saying go, “in the long term NYC won’t be Different from Miami or Tucson, but Manhattan is different enough that I might be dead before I benefit from the fact that even while it is different it is not Different”

Rents are up in the Upper West Side from last year and from five years ago. Yeah, I know. Nowhere is Different. So, that said, are rents up in the other non-different places. Perhaps.

And so it goes

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:29:11

“House prices track incomes in the long term.”

Mean reversion of home prices back down towards (real) incomes needed to support them seem a given. But what if inflation comes into play to prop up incomes at levels that support housing prices? Any thoughts on how young families watching and waiting should position their finances to hedge against inflation while they wait for mean reversion to finally happen?

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:30:20

Agreed.

Rents are up in NYC this year, in all the buildings I’ve followed the last three-five years. All are higher than 3-5 years ago.

 
2011-09-17 11:55:56

There are two or three separate questions here so let me unwind the skein.

You can’t bet on future inflation only on future unexpected inflation.

This is a subtle point.

Future inflation is already embedded into interest rates.

So if future inflation comes into play you are going to see prices crash real hard. Do you really think “they” want that to happen?

PS :- There was a one time pay-off when Nixon went off the gold standard but just like you can’t be half pregnant, you can’t go off the gold standard twice.

 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:15:40

Yep. Even in 2005, when I first played here, figured “Manhattan, last to fall”. Still, we are arguably four years into the fall… wouldn’t mind if Manhattan fell a bit already ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
2011-09-17 11:27:57

I’m being absurdly subsidized on the rent while I am building “resources”.

If it was left upto me, I’d like this situation to persist for the rest of my life.

What’s wrong with people? Can’t you just reason things through for a change? :P

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:32:50

What is wrong with people that their blinders lead them to think others cannot reason?

Rents in NYC are drastically higher than they were before the bubble. This is not so in most other parts of the country.

I opine that I find it unfortunate (feel free to disagree) that the benefits of waiting out the bubble so far have been less beneficial to those of us residing in Manhattan than to those nearly everywhere else.

Care to expose the flaw in my reasoning?

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-09-17 11:44:06

Rent stabilized? here was a starting point for negotiations in rs buyouts.. 40 times the difference between your rent and market…

or are you renting from an idiot negative cash flow “investor”?

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-09-17 12:14:39

Puss,

Your above assessment is skewered by the fact that your income level allows you to rent at a comfort level that is significantly below your means.

Those whose income is set at a survival level must spend a disproportionate amount of it on basic shelter and necessities.

From a survival standpoint, the difference between a $500 a month apartment and a $5,000 a month apartment is minimal.
And that savings can add up pretty quickly over whatever your comfort set-point is defined as.

Sometimes it just makes more sense to buy– if only to get rid of the sense of powerlessness in being at the whim of a capricious and rapacious landlord. (Yes, yes, I know….)

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 12:31:52

Zounds. I actually agree with the entire post.

 
2011-09-17 12:41:44

ahansen,

I agree with your assessment unconditionally.

It is indeed different if you change the circumstances.

However, all I can argue is that I have helped innumerous friends by urging them on to my logic. This is as much “financial advisor” and “marriage counselor” as it is the spirit of pure reason.

They have ALL come back to thank me.

Ultimately, we are all dealt a hand. We have to play it correctly, no?

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 12:43:37

—Zounds. I actually agree with the entire post.—

To clarify, agree with the post above under “ahansen”

Darn these strangely nesting blog responses!

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-09-17 17:58:14

Sillies,

One CAN be a progressive reactionary, you know. It’s called ethical realism.

Thank you. Thank you very mush….

:-)

 
Comment by bkkobserver
2011-09-17 21:16:05

In some areas of Manhattan (Inwood, Ft Tyron, etc.) I’m seeing a few price reductions on apartments, but not a whole lot. Co-op boards have a stranglehold on a lot of buildings, so people who might buy can’t (the boards can simply not accept the applicant and the deal will fall through). Helps keeps prices up, in a wierd way. No such thing as a quick sale for a lower price if the board doesn’t like the price. Also helps keeps rents up, since so many buildings don’t allow letting.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 05:11:14

Sounds as though helicopter drops of dollars are raining down on the debt-burdened Eurozone. The Fed’s cargo cult lives!!!!! Buy stocks now or get priced out forever!!!!!!

Central Banks Pour Dollars Into Europe
The world’s leading central banks joined forces to offer Europe’s beleaguered banks easy access to dollars.
—————————————————————————-
Dollar deluge shores up banks
By James Mackintosh
Published: September 15 2011 20:42 | Last updated: September 15 2011 20:42

Here we go again. In January 2008, the US Federal Reserve slashed interest rates 75bp at an emergency meeting as Jérôme Kerviel’s rogue trades were being unwound by Société Générale, the French bank. On Thursday, the Fed said it would pour dollars into Europe, via local central banks, just hours after UBS revealed losses of $2bn from alleged rogue trades. The timing appears coincidental. But the outcome could be depressingly similar.

 
Comment by BlueStar
2011-09-17 05:16:18

Yesterday unemployment in Texas reached levels not seen since 1983. Most of the losses were in industries and sectors that depend on government money like defense/security/education. Also the local Lockheed plant (largest payroll in Fort Worth) announced 600 job cuts this week and yesterday the Obama Administration blocked republican efforts to sell 66 new F-16s to Taiwan worth over 5 billion. Instead they approved a update to the 20 year old fighters Taiwan bought in 1992 from Bush. This will put a dent in our local markets because these jobs paid really good with benefits. Why would Obama do this? Looks like we caved to China on this one and Taiwan will be funneling money to the GOP candidate in 2012.
Two things to consider: 1) If Taiwan reunites with China in the future then the Chinese would end up with 66 brand new F-16s. 2) Taiwan is unlikely to find any other country willing to tic off the #2 largest economy by selling them front line weapons.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 06:42:16

#1 alone is a major consideration

Comment by oxide
2011-09-17 09:14:47

#1 sounds exactly like somethng that the Chinese and Taiwanese would agree to in secret beforehand.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 09:43:59

F-16s are 1970s technology.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by yensoy
2011-09-17 11:45:17

China has always had access to F-16 technology courtesy of their “all weather friend”. Look it up.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 15:14:53

But the newer jets would have better avionics than the old ones.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 06:56:02

“Yesterday unemployment in Texas reached levels not seen since 1983.”

Rick Perry’s Texas Miracle must be working wonders!!!

If there is one thing I hate worse than a mere politician, it’s a lying scumbag politician.

Comment by CrackerJim
2011-09-17 09:02:40

So, politics is OK as long as they are your viewpoints.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 09:46:52

He could have said “lying scumbag Republican politician”

(which is pretty much all of them, but I digress………)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 09:59:35

Well, actually, this blog is supposed to be about economics and the housing market. Unfortunately, politicians are prone to making stupid remarks in these areas, in which case I consider them fair game.

Otherwise, when some fool is posting political BS with no evidence to back it up, I plan to whack them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:27:56

If I post a link to an MSM source, I am passing on the news, not my own viewpoint, the way the RNC trolls who regularly serve up BS here are doing.

Needless to say, if jobs are added to the Texas economy, it’s because of Perry’s Texas Miracle. If unemployment goes up, it’s Obama’s fault. Simple-minded explanations have a great appeal to simple minds.

Sep 17, 2011 - 1 hour ago by ■ Lynn Herrmann

Texas unemployment on rise, Perry’s jobs growth agenda at risk

Austin - Unemployment in Texas rose to 8.5 percent in August as the nation’s economic crisis has apparently come to the Lone Star State, and the statistic will offer plenty of ammunition as GOP presidential hopefuls renew attacks on the state’s brash governor.

In numbers released by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) on Friday, the state’s jobless rate rose from the July figure of 8.4 percent. Despite the increase in unemployment, the state government agency noted private sector growth in Texas added 8,100 jobs in August, 16 straight months of positive annual job growth.

Still, the nation’s economic woes have drifted south, crossing the Red River border to finally roost in Texas, where the current unemployment rate is the highest it’s been in 24 years. “Texas continues to feel the pressures of a stagnant national economy,” said Tom Pauken, chairman of the TWC, in a media release (pdf). The current 8.5 percent is the state’s highest since July 1987, when the state was suffering through a real estate and oil bust which had seen the rate at 9.3 percent 10 months before that.

“Private sector gains were offset by government losses of 9,400 jobs in August, including 11,500 jobs lost in local government,” Pauken added.

The news could not come at a worse time for Rick Perry, the state’s governor who is seeking a presidential bid based in strong part on what he claims is the state’s s solid economic performance during his long tenure as governor. 

“His opponents will pay attention,” said Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University, the San Antonio Express News reports. “If Texas’ job-growth engine continues to sputter for several months, that would be uncomfortable for the governor.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:53:25

“The current 8.5 percent is the state’s highest since July 1987, when the state was suffering through a real estate and oil bust which had seen the rate at 9.3 percent 10 months before that.”

MACBETH

I pull in resolution, and begin
To doubt the equivocation of the fiend
That lies like truth: ‘Fear not, till Birnam wood
Do come to Dunsinane:’ and now a wood
Comes toward Dunsinane
.

– William Shakespeare

 
Comment by BlueStar
2011-09-17 12:50:18

Thanks for correcting that 19831987 unemployment statistic error. The local paper must have got it wrong or I mistyped.

Hey X-GSfixr, The original F-16 cost 12-14 million each and pound for pound it’s my favorite fighter jet. Everything since then, F-18/F-22/F-35 have only made marginal improvements to the basic fighter/bomber capabilities of a stock F-16. When measured in bang for the buck it’s still #1. A fully upgraded 1992 F-16 is still equal or better than most the newer fighters in it’s class.

 
 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:07:52

DNC troll alert

Sigh

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:37:51

Post an article or two, or else cease and desist, troll man.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:34:52

I post all sorts of useful tidbits. Links tend to be eaten by the system, so I minimize those. Thou art a troll for complaining.

Weird, how many threads are disrupted by your initiation of “troll”, like some sad grade school kid.

Soon, I shall have to respond “neaner neaner”, “I know you are but what am I”, in order to drop to your level of play.

Snort!

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-09-17 07:13:00

I’ve said for years the really big war will be taiwan. if china does a cuban missle crisis and blockades it, what would we do?

I cant fathom taiwan would voluntarilly merge back with the mother country.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 08:27:38

Top $ecret:

China Gov’t has more plan$ for Cuba than Taiwan. It’s much closer geographically to their true Long-Term Capital Management de$ires.

(This message will be brain garbled in 30 seconds) ;-)

Daffy: Don’t blame me— the Martian gets one episode per season.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 09:58:12

Because reality will set in. And the Banksters/Investor class won’t allow the US Government to smart bomb their Chinese investments into the Stone Age.

Nothing will bankrupt us quicker than trying to break a naval/air blockade of Taiwan.

We’re an ocean away from the action. Taiwan is China’s front porch.

That’s okay though……the decendents of Chiang Kai-Shek will be allowed to buy their way into the USA, while Xiuan 6 Pack will be left to operate under the new management, just like 1949.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 05:17:04

I’m starting to take the impression that French banksters are even shadier than their American counterparts.

REVIEW & OUTLOOK
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011

Dollars to the European Rescue

As central banks help French banks, we get a phone call.

The world’s central banks rode in on their Brinks trucks yesterday to stem the global run on European banks, creating new vehicles for access to U.S.-dollar liquidity. European bank stocks promptly soared, and now it would be nice if Europe’s political and financial leaders finally used this reprieve to address their solvency issues.

In its official statement, BNP Paribas said only that its borrowing from U.S. money funds had recently declined to €36 billion outstanding from €46 billion, so we asked the bank to support its claim that it was “fully able” to meet its dollar needs. BNP’s treasurer, Michel Eydoux, elaborated in an interview that “some of the money market funds have not renewed” their loans and others are of shorter maturities—generally one month instead of three to 12 months previously.

He said BNP is thus relying more on foreign-exchange swap contracts for its dollar needs. The counterparties to these swaps are, according to Mr. Eydoux, “banks and corporations who want the same maturities” that BNP is seeking and can no longer obtain from the money markets. The bank is also trying to expand its dollar deposit base among corporations and governments in Asia and Middle East that need someplace to keep their dollars.

Much to our surprise, BNP Paribas also requested that the French equivalent of the SEC, the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, “open an investigation into the publication of erroneous information about its funding in dollars in an article in the Opinions section of the Wall Street Journal.”

The AMF is “tasked with safeguarding investments and maintaining orderly financial markets in France” and it can also conduct investigations, although by its own account its jurisdiction does not normally extend to the press. An official at the AMF declined to say how often newspaper articles lead to investigations.

Meanwhile, a senior French government official called us “as a reader,” he said, to express his shock that we had published Mr. Lecaussin’s op-ed. The article, he said, “was quite damaging to this bank and to French banks generally.” At least he conceded that perhaps he was “abusing his position” as a top government official to express his displeasure.

We certainly hope the French government and BNP intention isn’t to shut down reporting on French bank problems. We can’t imagine, say, White House chief of staff Bill Daley calling us about a story on Bank of America, or BofA siccing the SEC on us. Relations between banks and the government are closer in France than they are in the U.S., but we’d have thought French politicians had enough problems without picking a fight over press freedom.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-17 07:06:25

The freedoms we take for granted (and thereby risk losing) in our country are greatly restricted or even non-existent in many other “democratic” countries.

 
Comment by rms
2011-09-17 07:36:34

“I’m starting to take the impression that French banksters are even shadier than their American counterparts.”

This is why many people’s revolutions line up the men, and inspect their palms for signs of work.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-09-17 10:43:11

Wouldn’t work so well in today’s economy—you’d end up with almost everyone except the construction workers and landscapers “up against the wall”. And both of those fields have tended to draw significant numbers of illegals.

Office workers generally don’t have calluses, except on their souls.

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-09-17 17:31:44

Yeah, and the doofuses of today who sit jobless in their mom’s basement and blog about worker’s revolutions would also be on the wall.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 08:16:01

I’m starting to take the impression that French banksters are even shadier than their American counterparts.

Speaking of “Shady”…The Chinee Gov’t communist have Capitali$m all figured out, they have a plan to… “beat the hou$e”! :-)

Hwy inserts theme music from Paul Neuman & Robert Redford: The Sting

(If a con game is successful, the mark does not realize he has been “taken” (cheated), at least not until the con men Capitali$t Grifter$ are long gone.)

heheeeheeeheehaahaaahaaheeehaahaaa… (Hwy50™)

Daffy: I’m so crazy I don’t know this isn’t possible.

China buys gold, challenges US dollar
WikiLeaks cables allege that China is buying gold to weaken the US dollar’s supremacy as the world’s reserve currency.

Chris Arsenault Last Modified: 13 Sep 2011

The cable is titled “China increases its gold reserves in order to kill two birds with one stone”. Taken together with recent policy announcements from Chinese banking officials, it may signal moves by China to eventually replace the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

China is shifting some of its massive foreign holdings into gold and away from the US dollar, undermining the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency, accoding to a recently released WikiLeaks cable.

“They [the US and Europe] intend to weaken gold’s function as an international reserve currency. They don’t want to see other countries turning to gold reserves instead of the US dollar or Euro,” stated the 2009 cable, quoting Chinese Radio International. “China’s increased gold reserves will thus act as a model and lead other countries towards reserving more gold.”

Last week, European business officials announced that China plans to make its currency, the yuan, fully convertible for trading on international markets by 2015. Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of China’s central bank, said the offshore market for the yuan is “developing faster than we had imagined” but there is no definitive timetable for making the currency fully convertible. Presently, the yuan cannot be easily converted into other currencies, because of government restrictions.

China’s gold holdings are small compared to other major economies. It has 1,054 tonnes, the sixth-largest reserves in the world, according to data from the World Gold Council.

Currency reserves

In March 2011, China held $3.04tn US dollars in reserves, Xinhua news agenecy reported. It is the largest holder of US treasuries, or government debt, with $1.166tn as of June 30, 2011, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Thus, major devaluation of the dollar would hurt China, as it would be left holding wads of worthless paper.

“If you owe the bank $100, that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $100m, that’s the bank’s problem,” American industrialist Jean Paul Getty once remarked, in a parable that sums up China’s predicament.

“China is locked into a position where they cannot sell a big portion of their dollar reserves overnight without hurting themselves,” Aizenman said. “It is too late for now to diversify rapidly the stock they have already accumulated.”

China alleged that “the US and Europe have always suppressed the rising price of gold”, but neither Weisbrot or Aizenman think such a policy is taking place or even possible.

Presently, China places strict controls on its currency, limiting foreigners from doing business in the yuan or trading it on foreign exchange markets. That could change in the next five years, according to governor Xiaochuan’s recent announcement.

By owning such large reserves of US currency, and through controlling the yuan, China can keep its currency lower than it would be if it floated freely. This makes Chinese exports cheaper.

The relationship, in which Chinese investment in US government bonds allows low interest rates for Americans to buy Chinese products, has worked well for the last 15 years. In 2010, the US ran a $273.1bn trade deficit with China.

“We pay our debts in dollars so we can print money to pay our international debts,” Weisbrot told Al Jazeera. Because of the dollar’s status as a reserve currency, the US “can run trade deficits indefinitely” while borrowing internationally without serious repercussions, giving the world’s largest economy a “big advantage”, he said.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:18:56

“China buys gold, challenges US dollar
WikiLeaks cables allege that China is buying gold to weaken the US dollar’s supremacy as the world’s reserve currency.”

That could come back to bite them if trade demand starts flowing away from China and back to the US due to its weakened currency.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 12:09:29

Achilles had a heel, thus the bold highlight 3rd to last paragraph. :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 05:18:56

BUSINESS WORLD
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011, 7:20 P.M. ET

When Greece Defaults
Countries must be allowed to go broke if the euro zone is ever to have discipline.
BY HOLMAN W. JENKINS, JR.

Greece says it’s not leaving the euro, and everyone else says Greece must default on its euro debt. What does such a scenario portend?

Athens, no longer able to borrow euros and hardly able to extract enough euros from its own population, won’t be able to pay its bills. Many of the hundreds of thousands in the Greek government’s employ stop coming to work because they stop receiving paychecks. Many private businesses that depend on their patronage also cease to function and cease to pay their employees. Savings vanish in a rash of bank failures.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 06:58:05

Greece has no choice but to leave the Euro and start printing its own currency, unless Germany continues to bail them out.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-17 07:15:45

Up for bid next is the charming Greek island of Angistri. 13 square kilometers, just an hour’s boat ride from the large Greek port of Piraeus and served by numerous ferry lines and water taxis to other nearby islands. Only 1,000 or so inhabitants to either relocate or employ, but be warned that Greeks aren’t the most reliable of employees. However, keep in mind that nearby Albania has an oversupply of willing workers.

Bidding will start at 100,000 Euros.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:41:57

If you don’t have 100,000 Euros available to snap up entire Greek islands, there are plenty of less expensive real estate investment opportunities in the PIIGS countries available at the moment for anyone on the receiving end of Fed-funded Wall Street bonus money to snap up.

HOMES
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011

Europe on Sale
The debt crisis has one silver lining: Falling prices for vacation homes in Greece, Spain, Portugal and even Italy.

By NANCY KEATES and MARY M. LANE

UNOBSTRUCTED VIEWS: Agents say some of Italy’s best values are in Umbria, above, where you can get a home comparable to one in Tuscany for 30% less.

That quintessential European villa—with a pool and maybe a lemon tree and a tennis court out back—is getting a lot cheaper.

Spain, Portugal, Greece and, to a lesser extent, Italy, all immersed in the European debt crisis, are experiencing second-home property price declines. The countries’ housing markets have been battered by escalating debts, recent austerity measures and deep uncertainty in the financial markets. A glut of new homes built in boom times in many popular vacation areas is making matters worse, as rental demand falls and financing requirements become stiffer. As a result, asking prices for second homes have fallen 15% to 30% in recent months. In less fashionable areas, prices for some properties are as much as half off what they were two years ago.
Photos: European Vacation Homes for Less

This 5,382-square-foot villa on the island of Corfu, Greece, has four bedrooms, three bathrooms, a lounge with fireplace, a swimming pool and teak deck. The villa was reduced from $2.8 million to $1.8 million.

“Price expectations have finally adjusted to the new reality. People are finally accepting that the game has changed,” says Joachim Wrang Widen, director of Christie’s International Real Estate in Europe.

 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-17 07:47:14

Do you still have to pay for the massive built in welfare system and insane public union salaries/benefits/pensions?

If so - you WILL have to pay someone to take the place.

Comment by bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-09-17 16:16:03

+1

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-09-17 07:41:01

It’s all just hearsay but the whispers have been around the web for at least a week that a soft Greek default has already happened and the stalling is about protecting the French and German highly exposed banks.

Comment by yensoy
2011-09-17 11:50:50

What’s a “soft default”? Something like “I’ll give you 60c for every dollar I owe you”?

Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-09-17 18:44:25

From a definition I’ve found, in a hard default all of a defaulting entity’s debt will be similarly affected whereby in a soft default there are considerable valuation differences

http://books.google.com/books?id=QhVWg1SqGSAC&pg=PA179&lpg=PA179&dq=define+%22soft+default%22&source=bl&ots=FIYHoOdxWs&sig=MOS2GoU8MK1O6RqxYfm_oiX0ElI&hl=en&ei=cUp1TrjhMObm0QGb6bzSDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCAQ6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q&f=false

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 05:24:08

Realtors Are Liars®

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 07:57:12

America [AA+] Day: #43

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 05:48:38

Law firm warns of foreclosure ruling’s effect

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 8:15 p.m. Friday, Sept. 16, 2011

WEST PALM BEACH — The national law firm of Greenberg Traurig issued an alert this week warning its lawyers that a 4th District Court of Appeal ruling in favor of Palm Beach County homeowners could “dramatically change the foreclosure landscape in Florida.”

The Sept. 7 decision in the case of Gary and Anita Glarum vs. LaSalle Bank says that an affidavit of indebtedness submitted by the bank was hearsay because the person who signed it did not have personal knowledge of the case. It reversed a 2010 Palm Beach County Circuit Court summary judgment that said the Glarums owed the bank $422,677.

“This decision could have broad, sweeping application in the lending and loan servicing industries and affect thousands of foreclosure cases, among other types of cases, currently pending in Florida courts,” says the alert posted on Greenberg Traurig’s website.

The Orlando-based firm of Butler & Hosch represented LaSalle Bank in the case, but Greenberg Traurig also is a bank representative.

The amount the circuit court said the Glarums owed was based on an affidavit of indebtedness signed by loan servicer employee Ralph Orsini, who pulled the information from a company computer - a move that appeals court judges said amounts to hearsay.

The court’s ruling means the home can’t go to foreclosure sale until the bank either gets another summary judgment or goes to trial. The plaintiffs have 15 days to file for a rehearing.

Ice Legal of Royal Palm Beach represents the Glarums, who have been in foreclosure since 2008 and continue to live in the home.

Ice Legal founder Tom Ice said the alert is a “transparent attempt to influence” the court to change its ruling .

“Being denied a prohibited shortcut may cost the banks a little more, but given that they are the deep pockets here, pockets lined with our own taxpayer money, the ruling is hardly unfair or earth- shaking,” he said.

Greenberg Traurig writes that the Glarum decision is the first case to specifically hold that an affidavit of a loan servicer relying on computer records is inadmissible hearsay because the affidavit was unable to identify who made the data entries, or how or when they were made.

“In the context of foreclosure matters, Glarum is especially concerning given the fact that the lending community uniformly relies upon computer data, including data from prior servicers, when drafting affidavits of indebtedness in support of summary judgment motions,” the alert notes.

It says the appeals court sent a “strong statement” that “may have achieved the unintended result of dramatically changing the foreclosure landscape in Florida.”

COMMENTS (none of them mine)

For all you holier than thou commenters that are surely going to comment on this article of how if people can’t pay they should lose their homes. Go Fxxxk yourself. This is a victory for the consumer. It is amazing to me that people who are not aware of someones circumstances are so quick to say….they deserve to lose their homes. So when the bank sales the home at 1/2 the price in a foreclosure sale. It is their fault! Right?. People are such morons….

diver4life8:50 PM, 9/16/2011

Greedy little piggies bought too much house, along came the big bad wolf and blew the house down. Now the rest of us pay for deadbeats to stay in thier Mcmansion free.

JB
9:18 PM, 9/16/2011

Hey diver4life - pay your bills so the rest of us don’t have to. Sincerely,

American Taxpayer
taxpayer
9:24 PM, 9/16/2011

So, banks can’t use computer data. Can we all now forget about our computer generated tax bills?

LOL
9:43 PM, 9/16/2011

Thanks to Tom Ice. A good lawyer working for the people. No really. All the PI guys say it but its not true. Ice is doing a good job.

Hearsay is not admissable. The amazing thing is that Banks and Credit Card companies have been allow by Judges for years to admit hearsay to nail their customers illegally.

Its very easy to put ANYTHING up on a computer screeen. If you did not prepare the numbers what you are reading is hearsay and could very easily by forged data. THisis a good ruling

Hearsay is not admissable
9:55 PM, 9/16/2011

These leaches have been living mortgage free since 2008, and continue to live in the house. What scum.

smitvict9:58 PM, 9/16/2011

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/foreclosures/law-firm-warns-of-foreclosure-rulings-effect-1862934.html - -

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 07:34:15

“The Sept. 7 decision in the case of Gary and Anita Glarum vs. LaSalle Bank says that an affidavit of indebtedness submitted by the bank was hearsay because the person who signed it did not have personal knowledge of the case.”

Sales Date
Jun-2004 17169/1558 $319,500 WARRANTY DEED GLARUM GARY &

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 6/25/2004 15:43:03
CFN: 20040370589
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 17169/1559
Pages: 20
Consideration: $255,600.00
Party 1: GLARUM GARY
GLARUM ANITA
Party 2: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
FIRST WESTERN FUNDING LLC

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 6/25/2004 15:43:03
CFN: 20040370590
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 17169/1579
Pages: 12
Consideration: $63,900.00
Party 1: GLARUM GARY
GLARUM ANITA
Party 2: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
FIRST WESTERN FUNDING LLC

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 7/20/2005 11:55:07
CFN: 20050449988
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 18935/1142
Pages: 10
Consideration: $63,750.00
Party 1: GLARUM GARY
GLARUM ANITA
Party 2: FIRST FRANKLIN

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 7/20/2005 11:55:07
CFN: 20050449987
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 18935/1125
Pages: 17
Consideration: $340,000.00
Party 1: GLARUM GARY
GLARUM ANITA
Party 2: FIRST FRANKLIN

Type: LP
Date/Time: 9/29/2008 11:47:12
CFN: 20080357258
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 22879/1902
Pages: 2
Consideration: $0.00
Party 1: LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TRUSTEE
Party 2: GLARUM GARY
GLARUM ANITA
ANITA GLARUM
FIRST WELLINGTON INC
WELLINGTON SHORES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
GREENVIEW SHORES NO 2 AT WELLINGTON HOMEOWNERS
FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Type: JUD
Date/Time: 6/25/2010 08:20:43
CFN: 20100235971
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 23921/1140
Pages: 6
Consideration: $0.00
Party 1: LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TRUSTEE
MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTORS TRUST
Party 2: GLARUM GARY
GLARUM ANITA
ANITA GLARUM
FIRST WELLINGTON INC
WELLINGTON SHORES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
GREENVIEW SHORES NO 2 AT WELLINGTON HOMEOWNERS
GREENVIEW SHORES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Total JUD $422,677.85

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-09-17 07:55:11

Muggy posted a link late last night for us to peruse those comments. Between the two it sure looks like things are getting ugly w/demand chasing limited resources down in FLA.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 08:26:18

GARY and ANITA GLARUM took $100k “eqiuty” out of “their” home and have lived there rent free since at least 2008 and that ain`t “hearsay”. By the way the 2011 Assessed Value for the house according to the county (which is still high) is $197,98. Meanwhile back at the ranch, the number of listings for sale continue to drop like a rock and rents continue to go through the roof. This is bogus man.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 12:00:59

I want a free house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 13:04:11

“I want a free house.”

If it were up to me, I would kick ten 3 year non-paying victims out and give you your choice of which house you wanted for free.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 13:30:50

I Wanna Be Rich lyrics

Songwriters: Gentry, Melvin; Calloway, Reggie; Calloway, Vincent; Lipscomb, Belinda; (jeff saturday :) )

Imagine
Cash cold, and a free house that’s what I need

These bill collectors, they ring my phone
They bother me when I’m not at home
Ain’t got no time to be fooling round
On this house I am upside down, you see

I owe money, lots and lots of money
I want the pie in the sky
I owe money, lots and lots of money
So don’t be asking me why

I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house with some love, peace and happiness

I want my cake, wanna eat it too
I want the stars and the silver moon
I spend my money on lottery
My favorite number is 1 2 3, you see

I owe money, lots and lots of money
I want the pie in the sky
I owe money, lots and lots of money
So don’t be asking me why

I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house with some love, peace and happiness

I want to do things that owners do
Buy new cars and vacation too
These are things that you`re gonna find
When you`re house note is three years behind

Because I owe money, lots and lots of money
I want the pie in the sky
I owe money, lots and lots of money
So don’t be asking me why

I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house for a little love, peace and happiness

 
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 14:52:52

I don’t support the banks, it’s their fault for giving out loans to people they knew couldn’t pay. But I am sick and tired of watching people live for free while I struggle to pay my rent, utilities,my student loans, attend college fulltime and work fulltime just to make ends meet. My neighbor has been living for free for 4 yrs now,has purchased 2 brand new cars since and has gone on multiple estravagant vacations.all b/c they know how to play the system. Would like 2 bail on my student loans
Student
11:02 PM, 9/16/2011

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-09-17 19:26:57

Student,

If seeing your freeloading neighbors live the good life does not make you depressed enough, here is a recent headline that should really send you right over the edge.

Kim Kardashian set to make $17.9 million on nuptials

Enjoy.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-17 05:59:54

When your hometown newspaper has an article like this - you know things are bad.

This ONE scandal is going to hand around obama’s (and the dems) neck for the next 12 months. And there are more coming…

Along with a double dip and housing prices that will continue to slide.

I predict in 2012 that democrat candidates will not use the word “obama” or “democrat” in their political ads…

——————————————

Obama’s Solyndra scandal reeks of the Chicago Way
Chicago Tribune | September 18, 2011 | by John Kass

The Solyndra scandal cost at least a half-billion public dollars. It is plaguing President Barack Obama. And it’s being billed as a Washington story.

But back in Obama’s political hometown, those of us familiar with the Chicago Way can see something else in Solyndra — something that the Washington crowd calls “optics.” In fact, it’s not just a Washington saga — it has all the elements of a Chicago City Hall story, except with more zeros.

And now the Tribune Washington Bureau has reported that the U.S. Department of Energy employee who helped monitor the Solyndra loan guarantee was one of Obama’s top fundraisers.

Fundraising? Contracts? Imagine that.

Steve Spinner was the Obama administration official in charge of handing out billions and billions of tax dollars to “green” energy deals. According to the Tribune story, Spinner the other day invited Obama’s national political finance committee to a meeting in Chicago.

The name of the Obama fundraising initiative?

“Technology for Obama.”

The idea of the Obama fundraisers getting together, talking “green,” and perhaps offering taxpayer loan guarantees to insider businesses in the interest of helping the environment — it all seems rather fresh.

Like a mountain meadow.

There are the guys who count. The guys who bring the cash. They count because they do the counting. They have leverage. They’re always there at the fundraisers. And so they’re the ones who are allowed to gorge at the public trough.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 06:56:26

I think the $20B a year we spend on A/C’ing tents in Afghanistan is far more scandalous. But since it makes companies like Halliburton rich, we won’t hear or read anything about it in the corprorate owned MSM.

We’ll see if the Solyndra deal will hurt Obama anywhere nearly as much as the mandatory Gardasil vaccination order will hurt the GOP’s near certain candidate Perry. The only reasonable candidate the GOP has is Romney, but if they nominate Mormon Romney a lot of Evangs and Fundies will either vote 3rd party or stay home on election day.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:09:27

“The only reasonable candidate the GOP has is Romney, but if they nominate Mormon Romney a lot of Evangs and Fundies will either vote 3rd party or stay home on election day.”

The sanctimonious RNC fools have gotten themselves stucco with an intractable political rivalry between a popular, unelectable candidate and a less-popular, though electable one. The RNC base won’t go for a Mormon when a hard-core Protestant-style Christian fundamentalist candidate is available. And the damage these two will inflict on each other before one emerges as the victor in the primaries may turn the finalist into tainted goods in the eyes of the national electorate.

It appears Obama is a shoe-in for the 2012 election.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-17 07:27:09

I’m betting Obama will pull an LBJ. “… I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your President.”

Then watch for a huge “grass roots” draft-Hillary movement.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 08:05:54

Hillary and Perry are both unelectable, IMHO.

But I acknowledge that I am not an expert in political science, and I often underestimate the ability of porcine beauticians to sway the sheeple.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-17 10:17:44

I think Hillary used to be unelectable, but I think that has probably changed. I had a big problem with Bill and used to rule her out just due to him. I suspect I’m not the only one. Time and horrible alternatives have reduced that pain for me. I doubt I’d vote for her, but she’s paid her dues (and for some of Bill’s sins) and I’d no longer actively work against her.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:26:14

“…but I think that has probably changed.”

I may join the RNC if you turn out to be right on that one.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-09-17 13:00:51

Bill you read my mind….It will be the only way to salvage his rep or this country….

———-
I’m betting Obama will pull an LBJ. “… I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your President.”

 
Comment by MightyMike
2011-09-17 14:18:29

You’re forgetting how that story ended. We ended up with a Republican president.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-17 15:22:16

Funny how many stories end that way.

 
 
Comment by frankie
2011-09-17 07:30:17

I wouldn’t bet my house on that; in fact I think I might wager a small amount the other way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2011-09-17 07:45:58

I think the $20B a year we spend on A/C’ing tents in Afghanistan is far more scandalous. But since it makes companies like Halliburton rich, we won’t hear or read anything about it in the corprorate owned MSM.

You keep bringing this number up as a talking point:

1. Your logic is that if anything cost LESS than this it is not really a scandal.

2. That two wrongs make a right?

3. I do not believe the numbers. I was over there for a year. You may have one kooky left wing article that estimated this amount, it is wrong.

4. You god-son obama is commander in chief. He could FIX THIS AT ANY TIME. But another round of golf awaits with his major campaign donors…

Comment by bigguy
2011-09-17 09:53:19

How dare you question the DNC

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:01:03

Why do RNC trolls think this blog is a good place to post their anti-Obama rhetoric?

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:10:45

DNC troll.

Sigh

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-17 10:19:52

Perhaps when they see the DNC crap they assume it’s a free for all? Didn’t somebody already debunk the 20B A/C bill and show that it actually included a lot of other stuff? And the point the Obama could order the A/C units shut off any time he wanted to is valid…

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 12:37:51

And the point the Obama could order the A/C units shut off any time he wanted to is valid…

Well geez, lil’ Opie could only do that after Jan 20th 2009 ;-)

It was Cheney-Shrub who left the A/C electric meter running 24/7 365 days a year for:

2003: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2004: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2005: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2006: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2007: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2008: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

“heheeheeeheeehee”

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-17 15:23:21

I bring it up because its a much bigger deal than Solyndra, yet the right certainly doesn’t care (and why should they.

“You god-son obama is commander in chief. He could FIX THIS AT ANY TIME.”

Correct (and no, I don’t worship at his altar). The fact the he has done nothing to bring runaway military expenses under control shows that he’s no different than the guys with R’s after their names.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-09-17 09:36:35

Myabe the debt ceiling panic backfired a bit. The debt ceiling rhetoric got the public accustomed to thinking in terms of trillions here and trillions there. So when some scandal like Soyndra comes up, people breathe a sigh of relief that Solyndra will cost “only” 500 million.

Meanwhile, the Gardasil scandal has no dollar value to an uncompromising evangelical base.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:01:17

Would you mind starting your very own anti-Obama blog, pleaze, instead of ranting about him in your every tiresome post?

Comment by butters
2011-09-17 08:20:40

Pot, meet kettle.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2011-09-17 09:18:16

Yep.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:03:32

“Would you mind starting your very own anti-Obama blog…”

Point out any anti-Obama posts I have ever made here, and I will be compelled to agree with you. Otherwise, I will have to conclude youse are a bunch of RNC trolls trying to turn me into a strawman miscaricature of my former self.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 10:08:40

CIBT, like me, is an “Equal Opportunity” BS caller.

We can’t help it if the majority of BS is generated by Republicans.

Like Jon Stewart said, you guys need to go to the doctor to fix that permanant boner you are getting over this Solyndra deal.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:12:17

“…the majority of BS is generated by Republicans.”

Stoopid is one of the most reliable sources of BS on the planet.

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 10:27:47

This site is disproportionately dominated by left of the center views. Libertarians like myself may be in distance second and knee-jerk conservatives like 2B, a distant third. I am no fan of Banana but while calling people triple chin, retardicans, not sure how can you pretend that you are elevating the substantive arguments here….

Permanent boner? That’s a good one. We should have permanent boners for any kind of fraud and corruption whether it’s Solyandra, Guardsil or Haliburton. Why does it bother you so much to talk about Solyandra?

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:39:30

“This site is disproportionately dominated by left of the center views.”

AKA anything to the left of RNC troll positions…

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:48:09

“…retardicans…”

If the shoe fits…

I’m not the one who elevated a campaign platform whose main purpose seems to be to pander to stupid people, so don’t blame me for pointing this out.

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 10:54:30

Not sure what RNC troll positions are? You may know it because most of your political commentary sound exactly like the ones out of DNC talking points……

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 10:54:49

All I want is for the freaking white collar crooks to go to jail. No matter what the party affiliation.

I voted Obama (the first time I’ve EVER voted for a Democrat for national office), because (silly me) I believed that he would be less likely to let white collar crooks walk, when compared to the Republicans, who seem more interested in putting poor people in jail than their financial supporters.

I used to be an idealist, and believe the “American Exceptionalism” propaganda. Now, it’s almost to the point where I’d welcome a Communist Chinese takeover. At least they have executed a few white collar crooks.

We’re about 10 years behind being Russia, in my estimation. But we’re a “free market”, so we’re catching up fast.

Democrats want to let everyone off the hook, and hand the bills to someone else, doesn’t matter who.

Republicans want to turn the country into some kind of Neo-Fascist Fundamentalist Christian police state, and hand the bills to J6P.

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 10:56:09

whose main purpose seems to be to pander to stupid people

So, you don’t believe the Dems do the same?

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 11:02:15

And……I’ve said NOTHING about Solyandra one way or the other, prior to my comment about “boners”. From wha’t been initially reported, sounds like someone needs to go to jail.

So I guess we’ve got a preview for next year in Washington. All “Impeach Obama”, all the time. While Nero fiddles………

It just seems like a certain segment of the population is way too giddy about it. Because it deflects attention away from other criminal behavior, and stupid stuff being said in “Debates”.

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 11:02:21

Good post, X-G. I feel the same although I was never a repub nor voted repubs in my life. I pretty much stay home or vote straight libertarians when I make it to the polls. I have come to accept that both parties are equally guilty, so it bothers me a little bit when this person or that person make it sound like one party is “slightly” better than other……

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:04:08

“You may know it because most of your political commentary sound exactly like the ones out of DNC talking points…”

That’s pretty funny. I guess the DNC comes here for its ideas, since I do my best to avoid political teevee or radio like the plague. But I truly hope some of my posts help serve to stamp out Retardicanism from the national political debate.

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 11:04:51

It just seems like a certain segment of the population is way too giddy about it

True. I wish the Dems were as giddy when they found out about Haliburton and demanded some action. Things could have been a little different now……..

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 11:07:29

Republicans are diabolical and corrupt.
Democrats are inept and corrupt.

That pretty much sums up how I feel about the 2 parties.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:11:00

…pander to stupid people

So, you don’t believe the Dems do the same?”

They have to aim higher, since their constituents are better educated than the average Retardican.

September 24, 2008
Education Level Linked to Party Affiliation, Poll Suggests

Once upon a time, political scientists could look at a voter’s income and history of church attendance and predict how he or she would vote in a presidential election. Working-class voters, the conventional wisdom went (and polls confirmed) tended to vote Democratic, while churchgoers trended Republican.

No longer. In the 2008 presidential election, the biggest predictor of party affiliation may be education, argues Alan Wolfe in an opinion piece in The New Republic.

As evidence, Mr. Wolfe points to a new poll by Washington Post/ABC News that found that white people without a college degree favor John McCain, the Republican candidate, by 17 percentage points, while those with a college degree prefer Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, by 9 percentage points.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 11:12:06

“Permanent boner? That’s a good one.”

That’s not what the commercial says.

In the rare event of an erection lasting more than 4 hours—also known as priapism—seek immediate medical help to avoid long-term injury.

http://www.viagra.com/taking-viagra/viagra-side-effects.aspx - 23k -

I have wondered if anyone has ever gone to the doctor for this condidtion. Seems like it might be a little embarassing in the waiting room.

This Jon Stewart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jon Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz; November 28, 1962)[6] is an American political satirist, writer, television host, actor, media critic and stand-up comedian.
Stewart was born into a Jewish family in New York City. He and his older brother, Larry Leibowitz (currently Chief Operating Officer of the New York Stock Exchange),[12][13] grew up in Lawrenceville, New Jersey, where they attended Lawrence High School.[6] Stewart has said that he was subjected to anti-Semitic bullying as a child.[7] He describes himself in high school as “very into Eugene Debs and a bit of a leftist.”[15]

Stewart criticizes news organizations for not holding public officials accountable, but when he interviewed John Kerry, Stewart asked a series of “softball” questions (Stewart has acknowledged he voted for Kerry in the 2004 presidential election).[67] Stewart responded that he didn’t realize “the news organizations look to Comedy Central for their cues on integrity.”

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 11:44:19

white people without a college degree favor John McCain, the Republican candidate, by 17 percentage points, while those with a college degree prefer Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, by 9 percentage points.

Why only select the whites? How about the whole population?
2004 it was even, I believe. One election cycle doesn’t make a trend. I am pretty certain that it will be even next election cycle.

Then again your premise it totally wrong. College degree doesn’t mean an education.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:46:31

“…while churchgoers trended Republican.”

Full disclosure –

1. I am degreed.

2. I am a church goer.

3. I vote either Republican, Democrat or whatever else I choose depending on the candidate.

4. I despise empty political campaign rhetoric which is targeted at people with empty skulls, and plan to repudiate it at every available opportunity.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 11:48:13

Eugene V. DebsFrom Wikipedia

Eugene V. Debs

Debs in 1897
Member of the Indiana Senate
from the 8th district
In office
1885–1889
Personal details
Born Eugene Victor Debs
November 5, 1855(1855-11-05)
Terre Haute, Indiana, U.S.
Died October 20, 1926(1926-10-20) (aged 70)
Elmhurst, Illinois, U.S.
Political party Socialist
Other political
affiliations Social Democratic
Democratic
Spouse(s) Kate Metzel (m. 1885)

Eugene Victor Debs (November 5, 1855 – October 20, 1926) was an American union leader, one of the founding members of the International Labor Union and the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), and several times the candidate of the Socialist Party of America for President of the United States.[1] Through his presidential candidacies, as well as his work with labor movements, Debs eventually became one of the best-known socialists living in the United States.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 12:25:55

“All I want is for the freaking white collar crooks to go to jail. No matter what the party affiliation.”

I will go along with that. After all the freaking white collar crooks are in jail, if it`s not too much trouble would you mind kicking all of the victim deadbeats out of the houses they have been living in rent free for the last 3 or 4 years. And if anyone knows, who would I vote for that actually has a chance to win that will make all of that happen? Nobody that has a chance to win, that`s what I thought.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 13:05:47

You gotta start somewhere.

Start with the biggest Wall Street crooks, and the biggest freeloaders in the “walk away from the mortgage crowd”.

As one of our fellow bloggers does so well, use the public records to show that a lot of these “victims” are actually serial refinancers who live high on the hog with 100% borrowed money (while running up the price of houses in the process).

Absent the free money from Wall Street, house prices would have collapsed in 2000-2001, thanks to wealth transfer, offshoring, etc.

There are no “victims” here, just levels of guilt. I’m just a high school grad, with technical training, and I could do the math back in 2003. Been renting since 2004.

The only reason I put more of the responsibility on the banksters is:

-They were the “financial experts”. And were paid accordingly

-They, and their partners in FIRE, are the only people who walked away with cash (well, the serial refinancers too).

It has occurred to me that the reason nobody has gone to jail, is because the crooks and swindlers are the majority now.

 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 13:47:27

The only reason I put more of the responsibility on the banksters is:

I still think the bigger villain was the gobmint. Banksters got the wink/wink that they will be bailed out, so they carried the government program, “affordable housing for everyone.”

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 15:23:27

“affordable housing for everyone.”

I Wanna Be Rich lyrics

Songwriters: Gentry, Melvin; Calloway, Reggie; Calloway, Vincent; Lipscomb, Belinda; (jeff saturday )

Imagine
Cash cold, and a free house that’s what I need

These bill collectors, they ring my phone
They bother me when I’m not at home
Ain’t got no time to be fooling round
On this house I am upside down, you see

I owe money, lots and lots of money
I want the pie in the sky
I owe money, lots and lots of money
So don’t be asking me why

I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house with some love, peace and happiness

I want my cake, wanna eat it too
I want the stars and the silver moon
I spend my money on lottery
My favorite number is 1 2 3, you see

I owe money, lots and lots of money
I want the pie in the sky
I owe money, lots and lots of money
So don’t be asking me why

I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house with some love, peace and happiness

I want to do things that owners do
Buy new cars and vacation too
These are things that you`re gonna find
When you`re house note is three years behind

Because I owe money, lots and lots of money
I want the pie in the sky
I owe money, lots and lots of money
So don’t be asking me why

I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house, ohh
I want a free house for a little love, peace and happiness

 
 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:39:49

DNC troll alert.

So why is this CIBT stucco’d on being the first to whine “troll” on the blog every single day?

Just sayin’

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-09-17 06:47:02

The “reasonably” price single 60 year old “2″ family house next street over
is still here 69 days….

http://www.trulia.com/property/3057290732-Single-Family-Home-Sunnyside-NY-11104

But it does have a nice sized backyard big enough for a round pool…maybe a shed, BBQ, nice trees kids would love having a nice play area….its at the top of a hill so the yard is flat and opposed to the bottom where the yard goes downhill..

Comment by Robin
2011-09-17 18:50:17

Overall area rating is good. If you’re in it for the long haul, what’s stopping you from pulling the trigger, if not putting in a low-ball offer?

Comment by aNYCdj
2011-09-18 06:34:29

the numbers still dont work its at least 40% too high….plus why would I want ILLEGAL renters living under me just to make the mortage..

Con ED will not allow me to put in a 2nd electric meter without a CO.

So i risk a non paying renter using up utilties and having to go through a costly process of eviction….

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:14:53

Whatever taboo Hank Paulson instated during his tenure as Secretary Treasury against uttering the word “bailout” certainly has ended.

Bailout delay squeezes Greece
Phillip Inman
September 18, 2011

Desperate … a police officer rushes to douse a man who set himself on fire outside a bank in Thessaloniki, Greece. The man was taken to hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening. Photo: AFP

LONDON: European finance ministers have pressured the Greek government to accelerate its privatisation program and implement deeper spending cuts, after they told Athens a €8 billion ($10.7 billion) bailout payment would be delayed until next month.

The Luxembourg Prime Minister, Jean-Claude Juncker, who chaired a meeting of the group of single currency finance ministers in Poland, said officials recognised renewed efforts by Greece to meet its fiscal targets, but a decision on releasing the next tranche of cash would not be taken until October.

The move was met with incredulity by Greek officials. They have already warned they will be out of money by mid-October and are reported to be making contingency plans to lay off public sector workers.
Advertisement: Story continues below

The US Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, who flew to Poland on Thursday to emphasise Washington’s fears of a second financial meltdown, urged euro zone countries to expand their bailout fund to better tackle the debt crisis. He warned the crisis posed a ”catastrophic risk” to financial markets.

”What is very damaging [in Europe] from the outside is not the divisiveness about the broader debate, about strategy, but about the ongoing conflict … you need … to work together to do what is essential to the resolution of any crisis,” Mr Geithner said.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:18:00

Trichet responds to Geithner’s ‘damage from Europe’ comment: EUX.TV
Uploaded by EUXTV on Sep 17, 2011

Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank, on Saturday said that the advanced nature of international economies requires increasing international cooperation between regulators such as central banks and finance ministries when it comes to dealing with crises.

Trichet made his comment in answer to an EUX.TV question, asking for his reaction to a comment made a day earlier by United States Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who spoke on Friday to eurogroup ministers after the “damage caused to us from Europe.”

Geithner’s comment was accidentally made public by the audiovisual services working for the Polish EU presidency at the finance ministers meeting in Wroclaw, Poland.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:22:11

bail·out
noun \ˈbā-ˌlau̇t\
Definition of BAILOUT
: a rescue from financial distress

Examples of BAILOUT

government bailouts of large corporations

First Known Use of BAILOUT
1951

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:24:47

Humpty-dumpty sat on the wall.
Humpty-dumpty had a great fall.
All the king’s horses and all the king’s men
Couldn’t put Humpty together again.

CNNMoney.com’s bailout tracker

The government is engaged in a far-reaching - and expensive - effort to rescue the economy. Here’s how you can keep tabs on the bailouts.
By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer

CNNMoney.com is tracking developments in the economic rescue as they happen. Click the links to the right or scroll down to find out how much the government is putting on the line.
Chart Links

Troubled Asset Relief Program
Federal Reserve rescue efforts
Federal stimulus programs
American International Group
FDIC bank takeovers
Other financial initiatives
Other housing initiatives
List of bailed out banks
List of failed banks
Obama mortgage plan servicers
Glossary of terms

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:27:08

Thousands of protesters to ‘Occupy Wall Street’ on Saturday
By Julianne Pepitone @CNNMoneyTech September 16, 2011: 7:06 PM ET

A flyer for Occupy Wall Street, in which thousands of protesters are slated to flood the Manhattan financial center.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Egyptians did it for democracy. So did people in Tunisia, Yemen, Bahrain and Syria. Now, activist groups are hoping Americans will launch their own uprising — in the form of thousands of protesters descending on Wall Street this weekend.

Occupy Wall Street is a “leaderless resistance movement” spearheaded by activist magazine Adbusters. Organizers want people to swarm into lower Manhattan on September 17 and set up camp for two months, then “incessantly repeat one simple demand.”

What’s that demand? They haven’t decided yet.

The plan is to crowdsource the decision. Protestors are set to meet and discuss the issue at the iconic Wall Street Bull statue at noon Saturday, as well as at a “people’s assembly” at One Chase Manhattan Plaza at 3 p.m.

The protestors’ demand will likely be focused on “taking to task the people who perpetrated the economic meltdown,” says Kalle Lasn, the editor-in-chief of Adbusters.

“The demand could be some stupid lefty thing like ‘overthrow capitalism,’” Lasn says. “We’re hoping it’s something specific and doable, like asking Obama to set up a committee to look into the fall of U.S. banking. Nothing extreme about that.”

Comment by SV guy
2011-09-17 08:58:17

“WHAT DO WE WANT?”
“Ummm” (crowd murmurs)
“WE’RE NOT SURE”
“WHEN DO WE WANT IT?”
“NOW!” (crowd cheers)

2011-09-17 09:59:58

BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:04:36

R u there watching (from a safe distance, hopefully)?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
2011-09-17 10:15:39

Firstly, Wall St. is closed on Saturday so they are protesting to a buncha buildings which has all kinds of irony written all over it. :P

And yes, I live on the UWS.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 12:28:46

set up camp for two months,

That should make up for Saturday. :-)

 
2011-09-17 13:07:49

Yeah, OK - the freakin’ computers are in Mahwah and Carteret.

Good luck with whatever they are trying. Sucks to be st00pid!!!

 
 
 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 10:12:03

Howz that Egyption Democracy working out. Mubarak the dictator is gone. Military the dictator is still there.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:46:03

Troll alert

Comment by frankie
2011-09-17 11:29:47

“Months after ousting Mubarak, the dictator who many called the Pharaoh, Egyptians are still living under emergency laws and are ruled by a military council full of the former president’s old ministers and advisors while the economic and social situation has slowly continued to degrade.”

“Also despite being in power for months, the new government, which is supposed to be a transitional one, has failed to come up with a timetable framing the next legislative and presidential elections, which will give Egypt the opportunity to elect its political representatives.”

http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/215164/20110916/is-egypt-a-proof-the-arab-spring-failed.htm

Ahh the more things change, the more they stay the same.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2011-09-17 14:41:43

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 11:36:09

DNC troll alert.

Sigh. Again.

It cannot argue issues, instead it whines. Gotta run. Got some Stucco to paint.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 11:43:36

It will be fine so long as the seeds of democracy are left alone and uncorrupted by Israeli govt.

Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 12:36:06

Should I say, “DNC Troll Alert”? If i were to do some stucco role modeling.

Instead… Sigh. If Egypt ever manages to embrace democracy as Israel has, Egypt might actually have some… democracy. That said, those places that lean to repression and caliphate tend not to stay free for long. As with Gazastan, they do have an election, maybe even with international observerse… once. Then the elected extremists, who were popular with the masses, toss their opposition off the roof, as happened in Gazastan, and that’s the end of election, until the next “Spring” , 30 years later.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 13:03:16

“If Egypt ever manages to embrace democracy as Israel has

SNORT!

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 14:53:32

I very much agree. The notion of Egypt embracing democracy the way the USA or Israel sees it really does merit a Snort. Thanks!

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 17:20:58

You agree so there is hope for you yet.

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 17:25:20

Yep. I agree a “snort” is in order, at the notion the Egypt will embrace democracy of the sort employed by Israel and by the United States of America.

You are welcome

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 18:17:47

The notion that Israel won’t interfere, agitate and corrupt the process is a……..

Snort Snort.

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 19:30:19

snort snort?

it agrees with me… twice. Cool

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:30:00

BAILOUT
By Merle Hazard and Wolf Jackson. Based on an idea by David Shayne.

I was working one day down at Treasury, when Bear Stearns gave me a call.

They said “Merle, we’re almost broke right now. We’re headed for a fall.

So I called up Ben Bernanke, and told him Bear was as good as dead.

He said, “Merle, let’s structure a massive loan, with a guaranty from the Fed!”

We got a little bailout, ain’t it fine to see?

Yeah we got a little bailout, from Fed and Treasury

Hope you like our bailout. Each brokerage and bank

Is getting extra capital so markets do not tank

Bailout! (Bailout)

Bailout! (Bailout)

Uh, Ben, I hate to say it, but the banks are afraid to make loans…. Yeah, yeah, and the money markets are totally frozen too. Isn’t it a little bit like Japan, or, really a lot like it? … Well, sayonara to you too, good buddy.

I thought that might be the end of the problems in our e-conomy

But we had some failures at regional banks, taken over by the F-D-I-C.

The problems kept a growin’, ‘twas a non-stop panic attack

We set up a federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

We have a swelling bailout. We hope you won’t dispute

The rapid way we’re spending. The problems are acute.

Come on support our bailout, we’re working ‘round the clock

To buy up toxic paper, and help the banks sell stock

Bailout! (Bailout)

Bailout! (Bailout)

I’m checking right here Ben, the T-bill yields yesterday were NEGATIVE. And unemployment could easily hit 11 percent, that is not a stretch….uh pitchforks in the street is about right, 10-4……Uh, yeah, we just can’t let them know that WE messed up.

Lehman filed for Chapter 11. Merrill had to sell to B of A

Morgan Stanley and Goldman are commercial banks now, it’s easier to tap the Fed that way

AIG, a big insurance firm, had some problems with derivatives they wrote

We’re sending billions to Detroit just to keep the auto industry afloat

He never showed me all the loans he made, but Ben kept printing up more cash.

Seems the more we did, the worse it got. Then we had a brutal stock market crash!

So we scrambled some jets from the federal fleet. We dropped ten trillion from the planes,

Plus some reprinted copies of “The General Theory of Employment” by John Maynard Keynes

We got a great big bailout, ten trillion bucks and more

Unprecedented bailout, it costs more than a war

We bailed out even big banks, like Citi and WaMu

Yes we got a great big bailout, but there’s more left to do!

Bailout! (Bailout)

Bailout! (Bailout)

The entire system? Borderline insolvent Ben? You’re right, I CAN’T handle the truth. So the hundred billion we gave Citi and B of A wasn’t enough? …10-4 Ben, just keep printing!

Some say to just shut down failing banks when problems start

And fire the boards and CEOs but, we don’t have the heart.

It’s easier to patch and mend and temporize away

Immediate cost is tough, we favor gradual decay

Bailout! (Bailout)

Bailout! (Bailout)

Setting a bad example? Messing around with incentive structures? Ben, you really are an academic. Remember what Tim Geithner said: those things don’t really matter any more…and don’t listen to Sheila Bair. All right…just keep kickin’ that can down the road and we’ll worry about that some other day, good buddy…Over.

Copyright 2009 Merle Hazard, Wolf Jackson and David Shayne.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:43:45

HOUSE TALK
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011

Will Expiring Loan Limits Kill My Sale?
By JUNE FLETCHER

Q. My house is for sale for $878,000. I have already dropped the price three times, and can’t afford to drop it any lower. I am very worried about the upcoming expiration of conforming loan limits, and what that will do to the pool of buyers that can get a mortgage to buy my house. Your thoughts?

–Arlington, Va.

A. The current caps on so-called “jumbo conforming” loan limits are set to expire on Sept. 30, although lobbying groups for home builders and real estate agents are pushing Congress to extend them. In high cost areas like yours, the cap for these federally-backed loans will drop to $625,500 from $729,750. A Federal Housing Administration study showed that the lower limits will affect a fifth, or 669 out of 3,334 counties, that are eligible for its insurance. The National Association of Realtors estimates that some five million homes will be affected by the change.

So to get a jumbo conforming loan, buyers who agree to your asking price now have to come up with a $148,250 down payment, or 16.8% of the purchase price. After the limits expire, they will have to put down at least $253,000, or 28.8% of the price. If they can’t, they will have to find alternative or supplemental financing.

One obvious possibility is a true jumbo loan. However, these typically require at least 20 percent down and usually are more expensive and harder to get than government-backed loans. Hybrid adjustable-rate jumbo loans are another possibility, although with today’s low interest rates, the savings are not likely to offset the bigger down payment.

Alternatively, buyers could find a lender who will provide a piggyback loan that allows a lower down payment. Such lenders generally are community or niche banks that keep such loans in their own portfolios. For instance, in your area, First Place Bank is offering an 80/10/10 loan that requires a 10% minimum down payment. The bank makes a first loan up to the conventional limit in tandem with a second. So in this instance, the buyer would put down $87,800, and then have a first loan of $729,500 and a second of $60,450.

2011-09-17 10:05:13

Dude/Dudette, that sale was already sunk given that you lowered the price thrice and nobody bit.

How do you feel about the Joshua Tree Treatment?

Sincerely,
– FPSS

Comment by Müggy
2011-09-17 11:13:25

“How do you feel about the Joshua Tree Treatment?”

They’re not just going to give it away!

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:43:08

More likely gonna ride the high-end falling knife all the way to the floor…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
2011-09-17 12:03:04

If you combine the JT metaphor with the “falling knife” metaphor, you get all kinds of wonderful images in your head.

Am I twisted? Probably.

But no more so that the twisty JT knife metaphor. :P

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:15:23

The sale price you could get now if you lowered your wishing price to market value is going to drop further if you don’t sell it by October 1, when conforming loan limits are scheduled to drop.

Sell now, or get priced in forever!

– CIBT

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-09-17 11:03:52

“The sale price you could get now if you lowered your wishing price to market value is going to drop further if you don’t sell it by October 1, when conforming loan limits are scheduled to drop.”

The price you could get now has _already_ dropped, since it is too late to get a loan funded by Oct 1 based on an application submitted now.

That train has already left the station.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:14:03

Cool! I look forward to reading about the big drops in high-end valuations next spring which “nobody could have seen coming.”

But I feel for a coworker who has a home on the market in the above-conforming-loan-limit price range. There are way more homes for sale up there than there are prospective buyers. Lower sale prices appear to be the only way forward from here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Robin
2011-09-17 18:58:19

And PMI?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:46:49

WEEKEND INVESTOR
SEPTEMBER 17, 2011

Who Killed Private Pensions?
How Companies Helped Hasten the End of Retirement Plans and Benefits
By ELLEN E. SCHULTZ

Gary Skarka had a rewarding middle-management career at AT&T, along with some of the best retirement benefits in the country. But instead of enjoying a comfortable retirement, he is working as a security guard. “I know I will have to work at menial jobs until I die,” he says.

Mr. Skarka’s financial predicament isn’t the result of investment losses or runaway spending. He is among millions of Americans who encountered an unexpected risk to their retirement: their employer.

Over the past two decades, companies have cut pensions, slashed retiree health coverage and killed other benefits. Many have reduced their contributions to 401(k)s as well.

Companies say they are the victims of a “perfect storm” of unforeseen forces: an aging work force, market turmoil, adverse interest rates. Certainly, these all contributed to the retirement crisis. But employers have played a big and hidden role in the death spiral of pensions and retiree benefits as well.

Workers with a significant portion of their net worth tied up in employer-sponsored retirement plans should be aware of the hidden risks they face. Here are some to watch out for:

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-09-17 21:00:07

“Many companies, including AT&T, converted their pensions to so-called cash-balance plans, which slowed the growth of benefits for older workers and, in many cases, froze them altogether for a period of years. Mr. Skarka, 64, who left the company in 2003, says his pension would have been $50,000 a year, but is only $18,000 because of the pension changes.”

“His $1,500 monthly pension was further reduced by $500 a month to pay for his share of retiree health benefits, leaving the South Thomaston, Maine, resident a monthly pension of just $1,000.”

“Employers’ ability to generate profits by cutting retiree benefits coincided with the trend of tying executive pay to performance. Intentionally or not, top officers who green lighted massive retiree cuts were indirectly boosting their own compensation.”

Unless you have an iron clad employment contract, you have very little if any recourse in this type of situation, and at most companies only those hired by the board (top tier executives) have legally binding employment contracts. Sucks for Mr. Skarka, but a good lesson for the rest of us.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:48:33

STUDENT LOANS
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011, 12:46 P.M. ET

For Student Borrowers, a Hard Truth

More people are defaulting on their student loans — and discovering the consequences are far-reaching.

By ANNAMARIA ANDRIOTIS

As many students and parents struggle to make payments on their student loans, many are finding this debt comes with some serious strings attached.

After years of economic difficulty and rising college tuition, the recent news that the default rate on federal student loans has risen came as little surprise to many. Nearly one in ten federal student-loan borrowers defaulted during the two years ended Sept. 30, 2010, meaning they failed to make a payment on their loans for more than 270 days, according to the Department of Education. That’s up from 7% in 2008. Much of that increase came from for-profit colleges, whose students’ default rate jumped to 15% from 11.6%, but the default rate among students at public and private, four-year universities also increased.

What many people may not realize, however, when taking out a student loan is just how different it is from other kinds of debt. Credit-card debt, for example, can be wiped out in bankruptcy. Mortgages can be discharged through foreclosure. For borrowers with crippling student loan debt, financial failure offers no such fresh start. The loan still must be paid off, and often with new collection costs tacked on, making it much more expensive than before. On top of that, up to 25% of a person’s wages can be deducted until the loan is paid back in full. (Private lenders must get court approval for wage garnishment and the amount they can take varies.) With federal loans, the government can also keep your federal and state income tax refunds, intercept future lottery winnings and withhold part of your Social Security payments. “Defaulting can be completely devastating to a family’s finances and sense of well being,” says Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org and Fastweb.com.

2011-09-17 10:08:35

Last night I had to explain in patient, gory detail the distinction between these two statements:

[1] There is no worth in having a Philosophy degree.

[2] There is no worth in paying $100K for a Philosophy degree.

For the record, the counterpart had a philosophy degree.

He simply couldn’t grasp that there is a LOT of worth in having a philosophy degree just not enough to justify shelling out $100K.

Thankfully, he was paying for the booze (which was much needed.)

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:45:01

A former professor of mine, whose undergrad degree was in philosophy, once shared a funny insight with me:

If you see a business school professor and a philosophy professor in a debate around campus, you know two things:

1) The philosophy professor is kicking the b-school professor’s butt.

2) The b-school professor makes three times the philosophy professor’s salary.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:50:00

September 16, 2011, 10:43 AM ET

Study: Lightly Regulated Lenders Made Riskiest Mortgages
By Nick Timiraos

A new working paper from economists at the International Monetary Fund finds that counties that had higher shares of mortgages sold by lightly regulated independent lenders also had higher foreclosure rates, a finding that suggests lax regulation of mortgage lending may have fueled the housing bubble.

The paper uses econometric analyses to show how these non-bank, independent originators contributed to riskier lending at a disproportionate rate relative to more-heavily regulated banks. “The market share of these independents as of 2005 is a strong predictor of the increase in foreclosure rates between 2005 and 2007,” write IMF economists Jihad C. Dagher and Ning Fu.

The findings, of course, don’t absolve banks. Instead, they argue that mortgage brokers and non-bank originators, such as Ameriquest, New Century, and WMC Mortgage, “contributed disproportionately” to the credit bubble. (Consumer advocates have also criticized bank regulators for failing to do anything to stem a deterioration in mortgage lending and for preempting more aggressive efforts by states to head off risky practices.)

The research suggests that deregulation played a significant role in fueling the mortgage boom and bust. It takes data on foreclosures, home prices, and the market share of independent lenders to make a series of findings:

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:52:34

September 14, 2011, 11:03 AM ET

Report: Housing Inventory Hits 2011 Low
By Nick Timiraos

Housing inventory dropped for the fourth straight month, falling in August to the lowest level of the year.

The number of homes listed for sale in August fell by 1.9% from July. Overall, the number of homes listed was down 19% from one year ago, according to data from Realtor.com.

The 2.27 million homes listed for sale was the lowest of the year. Inventories tend to increase by around 2% in August over the past 28 years, according to Zelman & Associates, a research firm, as sellers make one last push before the beginning of the school year.

The Realtor.com figures include sale listings from more than 900 multiple-listing services across the country.

The data show that the summer selling season drew to an early close, as consumer confidence sustained multiple shocks from the debt-ceiling drama, the eurozone crisis and the stock market volatility.

Normally, a decline in inventory would be a positive sign, but in the current market, that isn’t necessarily the case. Instead, low sales volumes and declining inventory suggests that there aren’t many opportunities for “price discovery.” The upshot is that buyers and sellers, uncertain about whether they’re overpaying for a home or under-pricing the one they’re selling, are further frozen on the sidelines.

Moreover, there’s still millions of properties in some stage of foreclosure or where borrowers have missed three or more straight mortgage payments. This “shadow inventory,” plus sellers that are waiting on the sidelines until demand picks up, will loom over housing markets for years.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 07:54:16

September 15, 2011, 11:12 AM ET

Buying and Selling Homes in Hard Times: Stuck in Miami
By Robbie Whelan

We continue our series today profiling buyers and sellers navigating the housing market. See past profiles.

Athena Kaiman is ready to leave the sun and sand of Miami for the country-music culture of Nashville, Tenn. Aside from her favorite musicians, Nashville offers affordable homes, low property taxes and proximity to an important business client.

But Ms. Kaiman, like so many other Americans ready to buy a home, is stuck. The problem isn’t just that banks are demanding a steep down payment. (She and her husband, who own a small book publishing-related company, have saved up enough money for that.) Falling prices are holding them back.

“We’re sitting on the fence, because however much money you have left over, the prices are sinking further and further, and you can’t see the bottom. It’s terrifying,” she says. “I would like to leave, but I am trapped here. I’m kind of heartsick about it.”

Ms. Kaiman lives with her husband and daughter, who is in law school, in a home she bought for $750,000 in 2006 on North Bay Island, which sits in Biscayne Bay between Miami and Miami Beach. She and her husband took out a home-equity loan as a rainy-day fund for their business, and are still saddled with $375,000 in house-related debt, Ms. Kaiman says. Meanwhile, home prices in Miami have fallen by more than half in Miami, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city composite index, to levels not seen since 2003.

When the economy worsened in 2008, Ms. Kaiman says, her bank ended her line of credit, without explaining why, a potential threat to her business. Even though she has a credit score in the 800s, Ms. Kaiman says lenders in Nashville are asking for down payments as high as 50%. Credit standards have tightened, and the couple are considered self-employed since they own their own company.

“I’m self-employed, but I might as well just say I’m unemployed when it comes to a bank,” Ms. Kaiman says.

 
Comment by Montana
2011-09-17 07:57:16

so how’s #occupywallstreet going? I don’t have cable.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 08:01:03

Oops…

September 14, 2011, 7:27 PM ET

Billions in Unemployment Benefits Paid in Error
By Sara Murray

Nearly $19 billion in state unemployment benefits were paid in error during the three years that ended in June, new Labor Department data show.

The amount represents more than 10% of the $180 billion in jobless benefits paid nationwide during the period. (See a sortable chart of each states’ overpayments) The tally covers state programs, which offer benefits for up to 26 weeks, from July 2008 to June 2011. Layers of federal programs that help provide benefits for up to 99 weeks weren’t included.

The figures were released Wednesday as the Obama administration promotes its bid to reduce waste at federal agencies. The federal government foots the bill for administering the programs, and states are supposed to pay for the benefits. Many states exhausted their unemployment insurance trust funds during the long recession and slow recovery, prompting them to borrow from the federal government to replenish their funds.

Improper payments most often occur when recipients claim benefits even though they have returned to work; employers or their administrators don’t submit timely or accurate information about worker separations; or recipients don’t correctly register with a state’s employment-service organization.

The Labor Department launched a plan to crack down on the improper payments, targeting Virginia, Indiana, Colorado, Washington, Louisiana and Arizona in particular for their high error rates. Those states will undergo additional monitoring and technical assistance until their error rates dip below 10% and remain there for at least six months, according to the Labor Department.

“The Unemployment Insurance system is a unique partnership between the federal government and the states. States bear the responsibility of operating an efficient and effective benefits program, but as partners the federal government must be able to hold them accountable for doing so,” Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said in a release.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 08:03:58

POLITICS
SEPTEMBER 17, 2011

In California, More Cuts Are in the Cards
By VAUHINI VARA

California Gov. Jerry Brown already anticipates relying on spending cuts and forgoing higher taxes to balance his state’s budget next year, sobered by his deadlock with Republicans over revenue issues this year.

“There will be no taxes, as far as I know, by the legislature,” he said in an interview this week.

The Democrat also said he hasn’t decided whether to seek a ballot measure next year that would allow him to bypass the legislature and ask voters to boost taxes—apparently backing off earlier plans to do so. “I’m talking to groups…but we don’t have a clear path forward,” he said.

On Sept. 9, the last day of the legislature’s eight-month session, Mr. Brown failed to pass a plan to rework state tax breaks after GOP senators balked. It was the 73-year-old’s latest letdown after he unsuccessfully tried to pass a budget pairing deep cuts with the extension of some expiring tax increases. Those higher taxes would have been subject to voter approval.

Although the Democrats control both houses of California’s legislature by wide margins, many types of laws—such as raising taxes or suspending an annual education-funding requirement—require the support of at least two-thirds of lawmakers, making it imperative that a governor be able to reach across the aisle. While predecessors, including Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, also struggled to strike bipartisan deals in their first legislative sessions, Mr. Brown, a former two-term governor, campaigned on the idea that his experience would help him navigate the state’s structural and political minefields.

“The most skilled politician will run into a buzzsaw” because of California’s dysfunctional system, said political analyst Larry Gerston of San Jose State University.

Comment by SV guy
2011-09-17 09:18:36

I hope the PC crowd is proud of the steaming third world hellhole that this formerly great state has turned into.

Maybe when moonbeam is finished mandating that school age children have to read ‘Little Johnny’s parents are rump rangers’ or ‘Lisa has two mommies’ he can get back to the fiscal responsibilities of his administration*.

* JB made a class in gay history mandatory curriculum for our public schools. Some things are better left private imo.

Comment by palmetto
2011-09-17 13:39:55

I’m with ya, SV guy. I don’t live there, but California was always like a golden symbol for much of the US, in so many ways. In a way, it WAS the American dream, immortalized by The Mamas and The Papas. Even if you didn’t live there, had never been there, it was a part of your life.

Now it’s just a symbol of the overall degradation of the US. Sigh. They say that “trends” start in Cali and spread to the rest of the US.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 10:23:52

2 accused of grim, real-life ‘Weekend at Bernie’s’

Posted on Saturday, 09.17.11

By STEVEN K. PAULSON
Associated Press

DENVER — Two men are accused of driving around Denver with a dead friend, running up a bar tab on his account and using his ATM card at a strip club in what appeared to be a disturbing reflection of the movie “Weekend at Bernie’s.”

Robert Young, 43, and Mark Rubinson, 25, have been charged with abusing a corpse, identity theft and criminal impersonation.

It’s unclear how Jeffrey Jarrett, 43, died, but the men are not charged in his death. The coroner said toxicology tests were pending. Young and Rubinson are free on bond but couldn’t be reached for comment Friday.

In the 1989 Hollywood comedy, two ne’er-do-wells find their boss dead at his ritzy beachfront home and escort his body around town, attempting to save the weekend of luxury they had planned.

In Denver last month, according to a police affidavit that gives an account of a story first reported by the Denver Post (http://bit.ly/nEgeF4), Young arrived at Jarrett’s home and found him unresponsive.

But rather than call the authorities, police say, Young went to find Rubinson.

The duo returned to Jarrett’s home and put his lifeless body into Rubinson’s SUV and headed to a nightspot where they spent more than an hour drinking - leaving Jarrett’s body in the vehicle, according to police documents. Police say the two men used Jarrett’s card to pay for the drinks on Aug. 27, noting “they did not have Jarrett’s consent.”

Rubinson and Young then drove to another restaurant to hang out, Jarrett’s body slumped in the back along for the ride, police say.

They then returned to Jarrett’s home, carried him in and put him in bed, according to court papers.

From there, police say, Rubinson and Young went to get gas and made a stop at a burrito joint, again using Jarrett’s card. The two men then went to a strip club, where authorities say they used Jarrett’s card to take out $400 from an ATM.

As the men left the Shotgun Willie’s strip club parking lot, one told the valet and a police officer standing nearby that “they were driving around with a dead guy and they didn’t know what to do with it and they were just going to go home really fast,” general manager Matthew Dunafon said.

Police went to Jarrett’s home and found the body.

Police say Young told them Jarrett was obviously dead while they were at the first stop of the night.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/17/2411396/2-accused-of-grim-real-life-weekend.html

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:52:34

The Wall Street Journal
September 8, 2011, 6:10 PM ET

Does Perry Owe ‘Texas Miracle’ to the Fed?
By Patrick O’Connor

Mitt Romney isn’t the only person who thinks Rick Perry is taking too much credit for the strength of the Texas economy.

Scott Lilly, a senior fellow with the liberal Center for American Progress Action Fund, argued in a blog post Thursday that Texas owes its riches more to the Federal Reserve than any initiative Mr. Perry put in place during his decade as governor.

Just as the Fed hurt farmers and oil drillers in the 1980s by increasing interest rates to tame inflation, Mr. Lilly says the central bank’s decision to keep rates low to spur economic growth led to the recent spikes in oil and commodity prices – spikes that helped Texas create nearly 40% of the jobs in the U.S. since the recession began in 2009. according to the Dallas Fed.

As the race drags on, don’t expect Mr. Perry to thank Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke for juicing commodity prices, given how many of his rivals for the Republican presidential nomination have threatened to replace the Fed chief. But you can expect to hear Democrats – and maybe even some Republicans – repeat these arguments as they seek to explain the job growth in Texas during the decade Mr. Perry has served as governor.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-09-17 13:26:14

Oil, and outsourcing of jobs from California, and the Industrial Midwest.

When those jobs move from Texas and South Carolina to Mexico and China, they can just blame themselves for their “over-regulated”, “overpaid” “overtaxed” selves (when compared no reg/$12 day Mexico and China).

The trend is toward the $5/day workday. Too bad all of your liabilities and assets are priced in 2010 dollars. It’s gonna be a bitch paying off that $80K student loan, the $35K car, that $10K Visa bill, or selling that $250K house.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:55:15

September 8, 2011 9:07 AM
Rick Perry doubles down on Ponzi
By Walter Shapiro

Republican presidential candidate Texas Gov. Rick Perry speaks during a Republican presidential candidate debate at the Reagan Library Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2011, in Simi Valley, Calif. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
(The New Republic)

In his inaugural presidential debate, Rick Perry had a choice. He could have emulated sports heroes like Charles Barkley in 1991 and Terrell Owens in 2006 and claimed that he was misquoted in his own autobiography.

Instead, the Texas governor invoked the never-retreat spirit of the Alamo and bravely repeated his description of Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” and a “monstrous lie to our kids.” That decision spoke volumes about Perry’s literary integrity, but it also may have left him about as electable as Barry Goldwater.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 12:22:54

Preacher Perry, aka, “TrueEvangelicalistia™” Christian Intimidator!

“Listern here you lil’ old spud, I’m bigger, meaner, and can wup your audit-the-FEDInc. arse all across the Texas sage brush!”

(Image Worth 1000 Words): ;-)

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/09/what-is-rick-perry-telling-ron-paul.html

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 10:59:58

A Question For Rick Perry When He Slams Bernanke’s Money Printing
07:00 pm
August 25, 2011
by Frank James

Texas Gov. Rick Perry greets supporters at Tommy’s Ham House in Greenville, SC, Aug. 20, 2011.
Enlarge RICHARD SHIRO/AP

Texas Gov. Rick Perry did a phone interview with Laura Ingraham’s radio show Thursday and it didn’t take long for the new frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination to go after the Federal Reserve once more.

He didn’t threaten Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke by name again as he infamously did recently. He did, however, express unhappiness with the central bank for “printing more money.”

Americans get it about this Federal Reserve printing more money and devaluing the dollars that are already not worth what they were two years ago because of the just absolutely horrible monetary policies and stimulus and debt creation that this president, his administration and, frankly, a complicit Congress were involved in.

Here’s the question someone should ask Perry the next time he pursues this argument. What would he have done about the deflation threat that worried central bankers and many economists in 2009 and 2010?

Comment by butters
2011-09-17 11:20:19

Perry would have done the same. If you are part of the status-quo, you will do whatever it takes to prop it up, like Obama.

But letting the nature take its course was another option. Not sure why people still support this massive money printing which has nothing but helped the banksters at the expense of regular folks?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:24:12

Dunno, and don’t know why the candidates can’t address something substantive and relevant to the national debate, instead of, say, religion?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 12:07:44

The New Testament Reconstructionists will lose the election for Pandering Perry. Pimping and pretending appears genuine to the NT Recon’s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 12:15:36

“TrueEvangelicalistia™” Headquarters Bully Pulpit: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. DC

:-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2011-09-17 11:14:12

Meetings on European Debt Crisis End in Debate, but Little Progress

Seems like truth comes out when the markets are closed. When markets are open, nothing but lies, propaganda and rumors……

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:16:36

“…lies, propaganda and rumors…”

More and more, it seems as though these factors make the world go around these days.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:19:37

REAL ESTATE - ON THE BLOCK
Mortgage deduction: Should this sacred cow be slain?
By Samantha Masone | sammasone@yahoo.com
Published online 5:05am Thursday Sep 15th, 2011
and in print issue #1037 dated Thursday Sep 15th, 2011

But just how helpful is that deduction?

Presently, only the 35 million tax-paying homeowners who itemize deductions (roughly 40 percent of all those eligible) can claim the MID, which allows homeowners to deduct the interest on loans up to $1,000,000 and home equity lines up to $100,000. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the average benefit to a taxpayer making $50,000 to $75,000 a year is approximately $1,227 while those earning more than $200,000 annually see a benefit of around $6,600. Given these figures, it’s easy to see why critics view this as a tax break that favors the wealthy and provides an incentive to borrow more money, a factor some economists believe played a significant role in creating the housing bubble.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:41:06

“According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the average benefit to a taxpayer making $50,000 to $75,000 a year is approximately $1,227 while those earning more than $200,000 annually see a benefit of around $6,600.”

MID = Welfare for the Wealthy

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 11:22:30

I don’t see any reason that politicians can’t keep talking about eliminating the unfair, regressive mortgage interest deduction while endlessly kicking the can down the road — same as they have done so far with proposals to wind down the GSEs.

Mortgage interest tax deduction: safe until after 2012 election?
Supercommittee’s likely course coming into focus
By Ken Harney, Tuesday, September 13, 2011.
Inman News™

Congress’ supercommittee — the bipartisan, 12-member panel assigned the task of cutting $1.5 trillion from the federal deficit in the next 10 weeks — met for the first time last Thursday, appointed top staff, and took preliminary peeks at alternative combinations of spending reductions and revenue increases that could get them to their goal by Thanksgiving.

Severe cutbacks or elimination of longtime tax preferences as the mortgage interest deduction and local real estate write-offs were on some of the menus that floated into the staff.

For example, the influential, bipartisan private-sector Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget urged members to “go big” and “go long” — well beyond $1.5 trillion — and offered several options on the mortgage interest deduction, including elimination of second-home interest write-offs outright, capping the primary home mortgage interest deduction at $500,000, and turning it into a credit.

Over a 10-year period, the group estimated that by limiting mortgage interest deductions and other itemized write-offs for high earners — presumably those with household incomes above $250,000 or individual incomes above $200,000 — it could knock $250 billion off the deficit.

Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 12:20:13

Write off the mortgage interest deduction for… everyone. It is a destructive thing even in principle.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 12:37:42

Glad we can finally agree on something, evildocs.

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2011-09-17 14:43:31

I agree.

 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 11:52:52

Israel descends deeper into fascist corporatism

http://www.philosophyoffreedom.com/node/5537

Israel continues to be such a bountiful source of internationally reported examples of the suppression of the individual that I can’t seem to get away from it. Israel has now passed a new law outlawing citizens and organizations from advocating for boycotts against any Israeli person or entity.

This is what the Israeli Govt wants for everyone.

Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 12:41:49

Ahhh, Arabs are melting down left and right. 3000 unarmed dead in Syria this season alone. And some obsess that a USA type country amidst the rot, has internal ups and downs similar to those in the USA. I heard so much noise here about USA Supreme Court letting corporations give money to candidates.

Darn that Israel, acting like Corporate America. Perhaps if they just acted like their lofty Arab neighbors.

In 1982 the Syrian government killed 30,000 – 40,000 of its own citizens. Assad leveled an entire city with an air bombardment followed by artillery and tank fire. Why? They were anti Baath party, and apparently in 1982 in Syria that was a death sentence…

CAUTION: Graphic descriptions of atrocities in the article
Source

“The residents of a Syrian city named Hama had been more persistent in their criticisms of the dictator than other towns. For that reason,

Hafez Assad decided that Hama would be the staging point of the example he was to make to the Syrian people. In the twilight hours of February the 2nd, 1982, the city of Hama was awakened by loud explosions. The Syrian air force had begun to drop their bombs from the dark sky.

The initial bombing run cost the city few casualties. It’s main purpose had been to disable the roads so that no-one could escape. Earlier in the night, Syrian tanks and artillery systems had surrounded Hama. With the conclusion of the air bombing run, the tanks and artillery began their relentless shelling of the town.

The cost in human lives was severe. As homes crumbled upon their living occupants and the smell of charred skin filled the streets,

Comment by ahansen
2011-09-17 22:26:18

Way to evade and deflect responsibility there– all while blaming someone else for one’s own moral shortcomings.

Gee. Come to think of it….

Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 23:29:04

Specifically, which responsibility even exists here, never mind one evaded and deflected.

USA has all sorts of laws and checks and balances. So does Israel. They argue about them in court (here and there) and some are tossed. Try protesting in the USA next time there is a nominating convention or try taking over Wall street as was done today ala Tahir Square and see what happens to you.

Still, in the USA and Israel, you might get sued or you might have to argue in court. You might appeal to the Supreme Court. In countries not complained about by Lying Realtor, they turn your town into a parking lot, with you under the pavement.

Perspective… folks need perspective before they gripe about a country.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2011-09-17 13:13:30

In the USA we have laws against saying hateful things about anybody.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-17 13:31:54

Did they give the Comedy Channel an exemption?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-17 20:18:39

One has to wonder.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2011-09-17 19:39:36

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote a book called Pandaemonium in which he cites high level, pre-WWII activity for a Jewish state in its former ancestral land, but that it couldn’t be pulled-off without the United States complete involvement.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 12:36:01

College Grads Behind Increase in Bankruptcy Filings
A new report suggests that advanced education can’t protect people from financial reality.
By Greg Howard | Posted Tuesday, Sep. 13, 2011, at 1:01 PM EDT

College graduates represent the fastest growing demographic of consumers who have filed for bankruptcy over the past five years, according to a new report out Tuesday.

Wait, really? Our high school guidance counselors always told us that a college degree guaranteed financial success down the road.

Not necessarily so, according to the survey by the Institute for Financial Literacy, which found that wealthier, more educated households are driving the recent spike in bankruptcy filings.

“We’re told that if you do go and get advanced education, you’re going to be almost guaranteed this economic success,” Leslie Linfield, the group’s executive director, told the Washington Post, which got an early look at the report. Linfield added that the recession proved that “higher education was no guarantee that you weren’t going to be at risk.”

The percentage of debtors with bachelor’s degrees rose from 11.2 percent to 13.6 percent between 2006 and 2010, and debtors with graduate degrees increased from 4.9 percent to 6.7 percent. In the same span, there was a decline in the percentage of bankruptcy filers who didn’t finish college, though they still accounted for about a third of all bankruptcies, the Post reports.

The institute also found sharp changes in the ages of consumers filing for bankruptcy. While the number of consumers between 18 and 34 who have filed since 2006 has fallen 31 percent, the amount of people 55 and older who have filed has increased 25 percent.

 
Comment by butters
Comment by rms
2011-09-17 14:04:34

The United States has become a lawless land.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-17 15:35:46

Only for some.

 
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2011-09-17 21:15:56

Too busy chasing guitar makers.

 
 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 15:14:11

Syracuse with frost and “hard freeze” warning for tonight. Mid Sept. Sigh, where did the summer go. This won’t be good for housing prices ;)

Comment by Müggy
2011-09-17 18:57:56

Jealous!

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-09-17 15:37:52

GM, UAW agree on profit-sharing in new contract

The Associated Press

GM CONTRACT: General Motors Co.’s 48,500 workers will get $5,000 signing bonuses and the possibility of sweeter profit-sharing checks as part of a new four-year contract agreement. The deal also includes pay raises for entry-level workers and guarantees new products at plants in Spring Hill, Tenn.; Romulus and Warren, Mich.; and Wentzville, Mo.

BACK STORY: This is the first contract agreement since GM’s bankruptcy in 2009. GM and the United Auto Workers reached the agreement after nearly seven weeks of bargaining.

WHAT’S NEXT: GM workers vote on the agreement over the next 10 days. The UAW now bargains with Chrysler and Ford.

September 17, 2011 06:02 PM EDT

 
Comment by evildocs
2011-09-17 18:44:46

I admit, I found it funny a fellow should post here that because Israel had a knesset (parliament) vote for a law he might not like, that he posted a major harshing here about Israel. I appropriately smacked it down, showing comparison to real problems, like Syria killing 40,000 of its non-violent citizens for supporting an opposition party.

So, naturally, hours later I see this in the news:

Hundreds of people marched near Wall Street in New York in a failed attempt to occupy the heart of global finance to protest greed, corruption and budget cuts.

Plans by protesters to turn Lower Manhattan into an “American Tahrir Square” was thwarted when police on Saturday blocked all the streets near the New York Stock Exchange and Federal Hall in Lower Manhattan.

The demonstrators had planned to stake out Wall Street until their anger over a financial system they say favors the rich and powerful was heard.

“The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99 Percent that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the one percent,” said a statement on the website Occupy Wall Street.

Now, this all is fine, really. But, would folks not find it weird if I posted, ,”look! The USA is worse than Egypt!!!”

That is why I object to simplistic “bashing” posts. Good and decent countries (USA and Israel) have laws we don’t like, have checks and balances (Israel’s left-leaning supreme court more often overturns laws from Parliament than does USA’s less left-leaning supreme court), and have contention. But, we don’t take a snippet to try to de-legitimize the country, Lying Realtors notwithstanding

Comment by ahansen
2011-09-17 22:35:58

You’re fighting a losing battle here, evil. De-legitimization is done quite adequately by the parties involved– your protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.

As we will soon see, the rest of the planet seems to agree. Maybe “Good and decent countries” should take note and ask themselves why…?

Comment by evildocs
2011-09-18 09:09:00

So you believe the USA is not legitimate. We will have to disagree.

 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-09-17 19:51:02

Zelman & Associates (regarding a posted article on housing today)- Their client list reads like the who’s who of the housing building industry. Sprinkle in home improvement box stores and related products. Even the REITs are clients.

Oh yeah, objective article. NOT

Reminds me of Christopher Thornberg’s career. I use to respect Ivr Zelman, too.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:07:23

U.S. jobs crisis may get bloody
Bloomberg, experts warn of riots
By Brendan Lynch
Saturday, September 17, 2011 - Updated 13 hours ago

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg warned yesterday if the national jobs crisis doesn’t end soon, the United States would see riots in the streets.

“We have a lot of kids graduating college, can’t find jobs,” Bloomberg said on his radio show. “That’s what happened in Cairo. That’s what happened in Madrid. You don’t want those kinds of riots here.”

Thomas Kochan, a professor at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, agreed with Bloomberg’s assessment.

“There’s so much frustration at the lack of jobs,” Kochan said. “I’m surprised there aren’t more visible signs of anger already. The American public is very tolerant and not prone toward civil unrest, but we’re living on borrowed time with this economy.”

And the hits keep coming — yesterday the Federal Reserve released a report saying U.S. household income fell for the first time in a year, dropping .3 percent to $58.5 trillion. Earlier this week, the Census Bureau put the U.S. poverty rate at 15.1 percent, the highest since 1993. And the national unemployment rate held steady at 9.1 percent as the U.S. added zero jobs in August.

But Bay Staters may not be as ready to riot as New Yorkers. Massachusetts’ unemployment rate dropped to 7.4 percent in August and Kochan said the state’s strong, diversified, innovation-based economy creates high-paying jobs.

“That doesn’t absolve us,” he said. “Young people have also been leaving the state because of high costs and because they’re having a hard time starting families here.”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:09:41

London riots rupture the ruling class
DOUG SAUNDERS
LONDON— From Saturday’s Globe and Mail
Published Saturday, Sep. 17, 2011 2:00AM EDT

In the month since my city exploded in flames and mob violence, much has been swept clean. The burned-out blocks in Tottenham, Croydon and Clapham have been boarded up, the glaziers have repaired thousands of smashed shop windows and the courts have tried 1,715 looters, most of them young and male.

The violence is done, for now. But what’s opened up is a rupture in the ruling classes over how the riots should be understood and confronted. Prime Minister David Cameron’s Conservative Party has spoken in three distinct and disharmonious voices.

It’s worth listening to each of them, because they’re talking about something that extends far beyond the grey skies of London, confronting the major cities of most of the Western world’s economies.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:13:35

Weather ‘right’ for riots
Causes sought as Watts smoulders

Alistair Cooke, New York
The Guardian, Sunday 15 August 1965 06.25 EDT

Today Watts, one of the eighty or hundred small towns that interlock across the beach meadows, the mountains, and inland valleys of Southern California to form the weird urban complex known as Los Angeles, was said to be becalmed or cowed or smouldering, according to the colour and temperament of one’s informant.

At any rate, it is at bay, which is only to be expected of any small town between Cyprus and South Vietnam where you have ten thousand soldiers patrolling, manning machine gun emplacements, and erupting out of “staging areas”.

In the sooty pall of uncounted fires and the rubble of a thousand looted stores, the Californians are , in their energetic fashion, calling in their heads of police, their Governor and his cabinet, their State senate, their sociologists (in a city whose university school of sociology is especially distinguished) to find out how it happened and why.

It is very early to isolate first causes or assign blame, but there has been no foot-dragging among resident Civil Rights spokesmen; institutional psychiatrists and liberals, who overnight have put together these “reasons” for the explosion of a routine drunken driving charge into the most mindless orgy of race-rioting that has happened in this country since the second world war, or in California since the anti-Chinese riots of the last century.

Watts has the lowest per capita income of any part of Los Angeles except its downtown “Skid Row” section for chronic drunks. Its population is 90 per cent Negro. Its crime rate is the highest of the Los Angeles suburbs: it had a record of close to 200 murders, rapes and felonious assaults, and 800 other crimes in the last three months. Unemployment is if anything, worse that the usual Negro rate. The school drop-outs are about normal for a Negro community.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:22:59

Housing Market May Be Better Off Left Alone—Economists
Published: Wednesday, 14 Sep 2011 | 12:28 PM ET
By: Karina Frayter, CNBC Markets Producer

President Obama’s proposal to expand access to mortgage refinancing has reignited a debate about the appropriate role for government in supporting the housing market. Some economists argue that the best way to spur the recovery is to stop intervening, let matters run their course, and allow home prices to normalize naturally.

The new initiative, briefly mentioned by the president in his jobs speech last week, seeks to help homeowners to refinance their mortgages at lower interest rates with hopes to stimulate consumer spending and boost economic growth.

Anthony Sanders, professor of real estate finance at George Mason University, says it’s a mere extension of The Home Affordable Refinance Program, which has helped only a small number of homeowners. In his view, the initiative is unlikely to have any significant stimulative effect on the economy.

“At best, that plan will generate $90 billion in additional borrower income. But that is only one tenth of one percent of personal consumption expenditures,” Sanders told CNBC.

“Households will appreciate the additional $150-$300 per month, but those will be taken from pension funds and others who invested in Agency (Fannie, Freddie, FHA) mortgage-backed securities,” adds Sanders.

In a recent working paper, Congressional Budget Office also expressed skepticism about potential benefits of a large-scale mortgage-refinancing program.

“Because the estimated gains and losses are small relative to the size of the housing market, the mortgage market, and the overall economy, the effects on those markets and the economy would be small as well,” concluded the report.

Some argue that government efforts to help struggling homeowners would alleviate labor mobility, which has been hampered by the housing woes.

But Stijn van Nieuwerburgh, associate professor of finance at NYU Stern Business School, says labor mobility has not been a big issue. “All areas in the U.S. are affected, and it is not the case that there are abundant jobs anywhere.”

Nieuwerburgh’s argument misses the point, which is that with affordable housing, workers with specialized skills can afford to relocate to places where those specialized skills are in demand. You don’t need “abundant jobs” for this to work — just enough jobs with specialized skills demanded where the would-be workers can’t come due to unaffordable housing prices for a potential drop in the local unemployment rate to not happen.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:27:26

Coffee Talk
House prices continue to fall
By: Gulf Coast Business Review
September 15, 2011

Federal government data on house prices continue to paint a grim picture of housing values on the Gulf Coast.

Using data from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the purchase and refinance of homes, the federal government showed second-quarter drop in prices in every area of the Gulf Coast except Fort Myers.

Nationally, using data from mortgages for acquisitions and refinancing, house prices were 1.9% lower in the second quarter compared with the first quarter and down 4.5% for the full year.

The table below shows the wreckage of the economic downturn on house prices over the last five years.

Three areas of the Gulf Coast experienced five-year declines of more than 50%.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:29:53

Property prices fall in more Chinese cities in August
(Xinhua)
12:19, September 18, 2011

BEIJING, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) — More cities reported lower or unchanged property prices in August amid cumulative government efforts to cool the market, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).

In August, some 46 cities out of the statistical pool of 70 major cities saw new home prices decline or remain unchanged from a month earlier, compared with 31 cities in July, the NBS said in a report.

Sixteen cities saw month-on-month declines in new home prices in August, up from 14 in July. Meanwhile, prices in 30 cities remained unchanged, according to the NBS.

As for resold housing units, 26 cities reported second-hand home price declines month-on-month in August. Second-hand home prices stayed unchanged in 17 major cities in August from July, according to the NBS.

In the latest effort to curb property prices, the State Council, China’s Cabinet, required local governments to establish new home price control targets based on economic growth and increases in disposable income.

The government has started to prepare home purchase restrictions in the country’s second and third-tier cities to prevent prices from further increases.

Previously, the government has restricted residents in major cities from buying second or third homes. Home buyers were also required higher down payments for mortgages, and property taxes have been levied in the cities of Chongqing and Shanghai.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:34:44

September 13, 2011, 7:01 pm Legal/Regulatory
Regulators Aim to End ‘Too Big To Fail’
By BEN PROTESS
Martin J. Gruenberg, the acting chairman of the F.D.I.C.Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg NewsMartin J. Gruenberg, the acting chairman of the F.D.I.C.

Nearly three years to the day that Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and Wall Street teetered on the brink, federal regulators are seeking to wipe out the infamous phenomenon that Wall Street is too big to fail.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation unanimously approved two sets of rules on Tuesday that would mandate so-called living wills at the nation’s largest financial firms, a crucial step in enforcing the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul passed in the wake of the financial crisis.

One new rule will force huge bank holding companies like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase — along with other sprawling corporations that present a systemic risk to the economy — to spell out plans for unwinding their business through bankruptcy should they once again fall on hard times.

Under a separate rule adopted on Tuesday, the F.D.I.C. will require the depository arm at the nation’s 37 largest banks, those housing more than $50 billion in total assets, to create their own contingency plans. The so-called resolution proposal would allow the F.D.I.C., acting as receiver, to dismantle the banks outside the bankruptcy process.

“These two rules will ensure the comprehensive and coordinated resolution planning for both the insured depository and its holding company and affiliates in the event that an orderly liquidation is required,” the F.D.I.C.’s acting chairman, Martin J. Gruenberg, said in a statement. The Federal Reserve must now bless the living will plan for it to become official, a move that is expected to come as soon as this week.

The rules underscore the changing regulatory landscape unfolding since the financial crisis, when Washington enacted a $700 billion bailout for banks, the automotive industry and the giant insurer American International Group. At the time, the Bush and Obama administrations said they had no choice but to rescue the firms. After all, they were so large and interconnected that their collapse would have further imperiled the nation’s already fragile economy.

But under the F.D.I.C.’s new living will plan, big financial firms must provide a road map of their business to regulators, who can then keep an eye on Wall Street’s health. The documents will open a window into the financial industry’s investments, trading counterparties and concentration of risk. The firms also must share what amounts to a Plan B — details for how the company can be wound down through the bankruptcy process.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-09-17 23:37:23

Posted at 06:00 AM ET, 09/16/2011
Say ‘good-bye’ to ‘too big to fail’
By Dominic Basulto

A Wall Street sign hangs on a signpost in front of the New York Stock Exchange (LUCAS JACKSON - REUTERS)

Three years ago, as the world’s largest banks teetered on the edge of collapse, the global financial system nearly experienced the financial equivalent of Armageddon. When Lehman Brothers finally went under in September 2008, the chaos that ensued was largely blamed on a wide-scale embrace of the “too big to fail” mentality. Put simply: America’s largest financial institutions were considered too large, too complex and too hopelessly interconnected to ever be allowed to collapse. That is no longer the case, now that the FDIC, Federal Reserve and Financial Stability Oversight Council have united on the mandatory creation of “living wills” for the largest banks in the country.

The idea behind these “living wills” is simple — before a large financial institution is ever allowed to reach the precipice, it will be required to lay out, point-by-point, exactly how its assets would be distributed in the event of its demise. Contrary to the wonderfully elegant risk calculation models of the Wall Street moneymen, there are, indeed, Black Swans in the financial universe — and far more than might be expected. Making sure that banks like Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and Bank of America have contingency plans in effect is a way of ensuring that a $700 billion bailout of the banking system will never be required again.

By next July, the nation’s largest banks with more than $250 billion in assets — the likes of Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, and Bank of America — will be required to detail how they should be broken up if they, indeed, need to be broken up in the future. By Dec. 2013, any bank or bank holding company with more than $50 billion in assets will be required to present an orderly plan for how their assets can be liquidated before they file for bankruptcy. Even foreign banks with significant exposure to the U.S. market will be required to put together a comprehensive contingency plan.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post