Many states (Ca for instance) make disclosure of the seller finding ” a home of choice” in the contingencies an upfront item. Buyers have way more outs than sellers. Any buyer who puts up w/ cr*p deserves their fate. Tighten up on seller escapes up front.
Hi Awaiting, I’ve noticed most of the homes for sale in Moorpark have Sold , only the most over priced are lingering on the market.
I don’t see this as a paticularly bear market in RE. where does the money comes from ? I do notice most of the people around here seem to be older Boomers while in Phoenix mostly gen X and younger. Phoenix RE has been going down steady since the bust in 2008 but here on the coast it seems to have bottomed. Older Boomers still may have some cash to buy around here ? Plus this is a fairly wealthy area and they say the rich are getting richier… although I would say simi has a fair share of public workers? just a guess.
cactus
Hello young man.
(OMG, I must be getting old.LOL)
The tight inventory is from people not making payments and coasting. I am canvasing for our home, and people are bragging to me they haven’t made a mortgage payment in years. Oh, how lovely for them. (NOT) Scumbags!
Rich to me is Lake Sherwood, North Ranch, and that level. Most of the area is living “big”. We use to live in 4,000 sq ft in Wood Ranch (remember?) and our neighbors were sinking in debt. They loved instant pools, furniture, new cars and SUV’s.(Addicted to credit.) We looked less affluent, but actually had $ and no debt. (God, I miss those days.)
Lots of illusion around this area. I’ve lived in it.
The flips that are moving usually have bad locations or bought from the inner circle of the REIC. Tight inventory and stupid buyers, imho.
Our buyer’s broker said to us (the idiot) just price it around $400K and it will sell. Regardless of size, condition, location, etc… We surely don’t trust him, but we cut a deal with him.
Moorpark has an excellent climate, but it’s not my flavor. I’ll tell you one thing, Thousand Oaks is the SFV circa 1983. ESL is the new normal.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2011-09-19 20:22:00
san fernando valley english as a second language
haha really thats just old TO between the 23 and moorpak rd plus all the rest near TO blvd
yea you’re right it is !!! almost
Olsen Rd Wildwood, sunset hills, lynn ranch and that new stuff at the end of arboles near North ranch still pretty pricy
I work in Westlake Village pretty surreal wealth wise
I’m not really looking very much anymore too lazy to fight all the BS I’m sure to encounter trying to buy around here. My flipper friend says NEVER use an escrow company to make deals, they use some other method suggested by their RE lawyer. I think if I do buy I’ll hire a laywer because realtors are liars.
Ok, here is my housing bubble idea of the day. Probably everyone will especially hate this one.
whereas the tax deduction for interest on mortgage payments is unfair to renters and those who cannot afford to own and
whereas taxes on unreported rental income is “lost revenue” to the federal and state governments and
whereas the working poor of this country are in dire need of extra money,
I hereby propose that legislation be instituted to make the first $1000 of rent paid monthly per household ($12000 anually) deductible from gross income for calculating income taxes (and not a tax credit)in addition to either the current standard deduction or as an additional line in an itemized return, so long as total rent paid is documented by 1099 to the landlord and a copy attached via tax return.
Corollary: If you live in a commercial complex which accepts Section 8 payments and/or military allowance: in return for dealing with your Section 8 neighbors, the landlord may only raise the rent on other tenants as specified by the county cost-of-living calculation.
I can sort of understand the concept of sprinkling the poor among middle class renters, and I don’t mind so much housing the poor, but I do NOT like the government effectively setting market rates for the rest of us.
I bought one of the NOLO books a month ago, so I hope it helps. I’m currently reading a book for first time buyers (Ilyce Glink), and she is writing a few of the tricks but not all of them.
landlords will love it! then they can raise it some more ??
Exactly….We talk here at nausea about how incentive-zing house purchases distorts the market…The same thing would happen to rents if you offered tax incentive’s…
Ah…You know what I meant…Not interested in a vocab lesson…
Comment by MrBubble
2011-09-19 16:45:24
I realize that language is in flux and that we’d be speaking high German or something if it were not. Heck, I don’t even need to use vwls fr ths prt nd y wld gt th drft. However, you seemed like the kind of person who would appreciate the correct provenance of a commonly misused Latin phrase. Mea culpa.
I think people over estimate the value of the mortgage interest deduction. The standard deduction is $ 11,400 for mfj, so the only benefit to itemizing (mort interest) is the level above the standard. For ex., $200k mort @ 4.5% is 9k plus other ded (taxes, cont).
The benefit on mortgage interest is another in a long line of lies sold by the housing mafia to get people to buy. 75% of Americans do not itemize but everybody says buying will save you taxes.
Plus, the standard deduction gets adjusted up regularly while if the loanowner’s proportion of payment to interest declines. Over time that delta’s going to shrink even more.
The MID is a big deal for some people. I’m in the 33% bracket, single, and have about 20K of mortgage interest and taxes to itemize this year. That’s a big deal (going from 5K to 20K), it’s probably going to “save me” about 5-6K this year to own this house (about 2 MTG payments are on Uncle Sam).
However, this is a benefit that flows almost exclusively to the upper income brackets. For someone buying a 150K house (which is what most of the country should be buying), they are going to see almost no benefit. And if you’re married, it’s even worse. My property taxes get me over the standard deduction in one fell swoop, every dollar of interest I pay is deductible.
However, all that said, this is kind of like welfare for the upper-middle class, and it’s SO twisted by Realtors when buying/selling houses (”Think of all the money you’ll save on taxes”, to a family with 2 children looking at a 150K house)..
I’ve mentioned this before, but there’s one demographic that doesn’t get mentioned here much for whom the MID is a big deal. That’s people who also pay tithing to their church in addition to borrowing for a home. Generally the tithing itself doesn’t exceed the standard deduction and the mortgage interest doesn’t exceed it by much, but when you put the two together it’s a big deal.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-19 11:18:26
Plus you get to itemize your property and local income taxe paid too.
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-09-19 14:56:26
Also if you have high medical bills over that high hurdle.
Totally agree with you OT, but for the average Joe it is a no go. To further illustrate your point about it being for upper income only, how many middle income taxpayers have a vacation property/$120k motorhome/ etc.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Overtaxed
2011-09-19 10:21:54
“how many middle income taxpayers have a vacation property/$120k motorhome/ etc.”
The answer should be “about 0″. Vacation homes are another thing that’s really for the “rich”, not something that middle income people (even folks in the 200-300K/yr range) should really consider. Without appreciation (and nobody sees that in the immediate future) there’s simply no way that you can make a vacation home make sense compared to renting a place for the 2-3 weeks of vacation that most people get. Same thing with a motorhome.
Comment by Montana
2011-09-19 13:01:04
“Same thing with a motorhome.”
Never got the motorhome fetish. It seems to come with old age, something to fuss over and brag about. I have two neighbors who each had cheaper MH, and then they both exchanged them for 5th wheelers. It seems to be some sort of competition.
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-19 15:18:29
RV are multi use rigs. They’re houses on wheels that *can* pay for themselves. I’m living in my 5ver during the week and netting $1000/month in per diem on it. We bought it in 2008 when the economy siezed up(a little over 50% of list price) and used it for pleasure for 2.5 years.
However, all that said, this is kind of like welfare for the upper-middle class
how is it welfare for the upper middle class when they’re the ones paying most of taxes anyway?
Who are the taxes they’re not paying due to MID being foisted on to?
(not that I agree with MID, but I’m not sure it’s welfare for a specific income group in any way)
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Overtaxed
2011-09-19 10:26:50
It’s welfare for the upper-middle class because they are the only ones with enough interest/taxes to make it worthwhile to deduct. The lower-middle class is just usually “duped” into believing that their going to be helped by the deductions; typically be their loving Realtor.
Who’s paying the taxes that they (I) aren’t paying? Mostly renters. And lower income households.
Where else in the tax code do we have a system that provides a bigger and bigger break for more debt and more income? That system just doesn’t make sense, even though, for me personally, it’s great. Just because it’s good for me doesn’t make it good policy (IMHO).
Removing the MID would have the biggest effect on houses in the 400-1M dollar price range. That’s where most of the folks are that are getting BIG benefits from this tax policy.
Unfortunately (from a tax perspective) I’m getting married next year, so I’m going to lose a lot of the advantage. Still going to be worth 1000’s, but not the same as it’s worth to me this year.
Comment by oxide
2011-09-19 12:34:56
Drummin refuses to admit that this really isn’t a “tax break.” MID is free money that has nothing to do with taxes.
Rather than set up a separate agency each time the government wants to hand out free money, the gov just uses the existing mechanism — the IRS — to hand out the money, mainly by subtracting from what you owe. That way there’s only one check in the mail. But it’s still free money, and still has NOTHING to do with taxes. So you can’t use the “I already pay too many taxes” argument (not that it stops them).
Drummin refuses to admit that this really isn’t a “tax break.” MID is free money that has nothing to do with taxes.
Dude, you really need to step back from the keyboard a bit. You’re attacking me directly why? Because I pointed out it’s not so much about income class as it is about homeowner vs not?
“Tax break” vs “free money” isn’t relevant to the comment I was making.
Comment by oxide
2011-09-19 15:36:53
Dude, we’ve had this discussion before. Free money is free money, no matter how rich you are.
Now to be fair, I think there should be MID on primary home only, and for the first $417K of mortgage, regardless of how luxe the house is. That way everybody gets the same freebie.
Comment by Pete
2011-09-19 19:47:26
We are paying about 8000/year in mortgage interest on a house we bought last year. Our interest paid comes nowhere near the standard deduction for mfj. I don’t know when the MID was put into effect, but I’m sure the interest rate was higher. In other words, if interest rates today were 8%, we would see a little benefit from the MID. I agree that MID law should be greatly modified, but perhaps it helped the middle class as well when it got started.
As a single guy living in a moderate to somewhat high tax state, the combination of state income and property taxes are about the same as my MID. But my mortgage interest is low and soon to disappear so it’s still not a big factor.
My benefit is less than half of what you would think it would be based on the math of the highest marginal rate, due to all sorts of limitations (AMT, etc.).
Sure, I’d like to have the MID rather than not, but it won’t be the end of the world if it goes away.
whereas taxes on unreported rental income is “lost revenue” to the federal and state governments
That’s a huge problem here in Pima County, AZ.
As mentioned umpteen times before, I go on Cycling Intelligence Agency rides around central Tucson. And Agent Slim has found numerous rental houses that are listed in the county assessor records as being residential owner occupied.
I’ve tried to report them, only to get the “lah-dee-dah” treatment down at the county government. Perhaps I should lift my game and report ‘em to the IRS.
Why should those of us who scrimped and saved to buy a house with no mortgage, who take care of all our own maintenance and insurances, pay property taxes to educate renters’ kids, protect renters’ rights and property, provide renters’ social services and subsidies, repair renters’ roads and infrastructure, etc. subsidize those who did not?
Other than that, it’s an interesting concept with no chance of going anywhere in a time of diminished tax revenues.
Hansen, the renters are still paying every cent of property tax that you are paying in the form of the rent they pay that the landlord in turn pays in tax. I see no way in which “homeowners” pay tax that renters do not. Renters just pay it to the landlord who then passes the money along. These taxes would continue to be paid by renters.
The biggest thing I see here is if you subsidize something, the price will go up. So expect rents to rise if this ever passed. However, that might push us back in balance to owning a home being more affordable, so I actually see a win here for homeowners also.
“Hansen, the renters are still paying every cent of property tax that you are paying in the form of the rent they pay that the landlord in turn pays in tax.”
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ahansen
2011-09-19 14:28:42
I’d argue that many landlords are now subsidizing their renters –who pay a fraction of the actual costs of “owning” the property they rent until “the market turns around.”
2. Many retirees, for example, rent out properties at ONLY the property tax and the original mortgage, preferring the monthly loss to the hassle of keeping the place “up to commercial standards” (which let’s face it, is a higher standard that the average homeowner maintains for himself,) in essence, taking a loss for allowing you to live there on benefit of their investment. (I know I’ve been beneficiary of this largesse.)
3. Let us not forget “rent-stabilized” and Section 8 housing units. You’re seriously arguing that these pay for the Federal State, and municipal services they consume?
4. Churches, charities, foundations rent out donated properties for far less than they cost the giver. Again, the rest of the community picks up the loss to the tax base.
Shall I continue?
Please don’t think that I’m saying it’s not a fair concept. I was just asked to support a petition to forgive underwater student loans, too. An admirable idea, but it’s another give-away at the expense of the responsible that our country simply cannot afford until it gets its financial affairs in order.
Comment by oxide
2011-09-19 15:38:16
I for one do NOT support forgiving student loans. How are you supposed to give knowledge back to the bank?
Comment by mathguy
2011-09-19 16:35:24
ahansen.. yes you should continue.. what percentage of rentals are giveaways where landlords are subsidizing the tenants? I can only guess, but being very generous I would say it is no more than 5-10% . Also, if you were section 8, in my world, this deduction wouldn’t apply due to being a competing program.
I am a firm believer in not letting perfect be the enemy of improvement. Also, no one is giving money away in this scenario. You would have to be paying rent to get the deduction. Business es deduct their lease and rental costs when doing business, but obviously can’t deduct a rental cost if they own. Seems to work perfectly fairly in that situation. OTOH, they are allowed to depreciate buildings.. can homeowners currently do this? I know landlords can expense improvements and repairs to the house/apartment…
Comment by ahansen
2011-09-19 20:16:56
Tax policy tends to favor the forces of stability. Homeowners are typically more invested in their communities than renters. They’ve built and supported the infrastructure, systems, agencies, services. Businesses and local governments are similarly encouraged, getting the tax benefits that encourage their establishment. (Theoretically, anyway.)
Renters are typically transient; coming in after the hard work is done and subsequently paying a premium for having it all there ready for their use and benefit– by the month.
Renters ARE paying the property tax in most cases. If landlords are in the red every month, one might argue they are paying for something, but for the most part, it’s the renters who are paying for the mortgage, taxes, repairs, etc.
This is in response to yesterday’s thread about more pending sales…
Interesting that you guys are all noticing an uptick in pending sales.
In our ‘hood (North County Coastal San Diego), the market seems to have fallen off a cliff. Very little is pending, and there are quite a few BOMs and listings removed from the market. Some homes that had multiple offers in the spring have been relisted, and they are now sitting without any offers at all.
If you’re seeing more activity in your areas, I’m quite sure it has to do with mortgage rates being near 60-year lows. From what I’ve seen, this is the first time in over 10 years of closely watching local markets that a drop in interest rates like this hasn’t spurred sales. As a matter of fact, it seems like the low rates and drop in sales happened about the same time.
Again, this is the first time I’ve seen this in over 10 years — there is a definite change this year. Even during the financial “crisis,” people were still out there trying to outbid one another in our area. Only in the second half of 2007 did we see a slowdown. Once the govt got involved in 2008, it was off to the races, once again.
IMHO, the second leg of the downturn has begun, and I think the political climate has changed enough that they won’t be allowed to throw money at housing in an attempt to keep prices artificially inflated. The risks have largely been shifted from the private market to the public, which means they can now allow prices to drop.
Amen. Not only are they not affordable to most but they are so poorly built and designed that even at affordable pricing I don’t want most of what is now available or will be available. There are a lot of money pits out there.
Houses are still not affordable, and neither are rents, BTW. We are lucky because I planned on this, so locked in with a very good LL back in 2004 who has not raised our rent (I’ve raised it once in order to retain control over the increases — they love us because of it, and it keeps them from rocking the boat).
“IMHO, the second leg of the downturn has begun …”
And, IMHO, this second downturn won’t be limited to just housing.
“… and I think the political climate has changed enough that they won’t be allowed to throw money at housing in an attempt to keep prices artificially inflated.”
Nor will the political climate allow money to be thrown into the economy in general to keep the economy in general inflated.
” The risks have largely been shifted from the private market to the public, which means they can now allow prices to drop.”
OK, let the third inning start.
The government guarantees were not part of a program to let prices drop, they are aimed at keeping prices up and keeping the ponzi from collapsing.
The weight put on the taxpayer shoulder only bought time. Time seems to be our enemy. In 2008, we took a dive in a global updraft. Not so today. JMO, but we’d be better off if we had hit the chutes in 2008.
“The weight put on the taxpayer shoulder only bought time.”
Is there any way the federal guarantees could be put up to vote? Because I would gladly vote to rescind them and stick them back on Megabank, Inc’s plate, where they belong.
You bring up a good point C’BT. Elections are around the corner. Might be a good time to consider not supporting the same old bunch of cronies. Is there anybody running for Congress anywhere who is not taking $$ from the big monied interests? That’s the vote we get.
I think the govt guarantees were put in place to protect the monied interests who control our govt. They were not designed to keep prices high over the long run…only during the time it took to shift the risks/losses.
That’s done, which is why I think the next leg down begins shortly.
The low interest rates and high rents are bringing the monthly nuts close enough together that it makes a LOT of sense to buy. And don’t forget that areas like DC have a “jobs premium” on housing which didn’t exist 15 or even 10 years ago. Waiting longer will just ensure that houses in my price range will be even more trashed than they already are.
We’ve had people on this board note that it is not longer the ability to buy that is keeping them from purchasing, but the belief that values will continue to fall.
Said another way. If you assume 0%+ home price growth, in most places, the math says you should buy now based on rent levels as compared to mortgage payment (even including all other ownership costs). If you assume continued falling prices, then it doesn’t necessarily make sense to purchase, even if the monthly cost of ownership is somewhat cheaper. Of course, if it is a LOT cheaper to own, you can subsidize the losses with savings each month.
I personally believe that we are close enough to bottom in prices for markets with low vacancies and low inventory, that if you find a place that you really want to live in for a long time, and you want to own a home eventually, you should consider acting now.
Keep in mind that you have to project future RENTS as well to see whether purchase makes sense. In a normal market, one of the reasons to purchase is the anticipation that rents will continue going up while cost of servicing your mortgage is fixed. Of course with the bubble and bust driven oversupply in housing, rising rents aren’t as inevitable as they were once thought to be.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Awaiting
2011-09-19 11:10:07
In our dump (apt bldg) there are 8/20 vacant apts in our little courtyard, some being vacant over 1 year. I heard out of the 48 total units (total) 14-16 are vacant, and this is Thousand Oaks. Families are bunking up and new family formation is dead. I don’t think most LL can afford to raise rents.
Comment by Moman
2011-09-19 12:38:24
Rents have been temporarily rising as the media have been so fond to point out. What they never point out, at their detriment, is that once the backlog of homes hits the market that rents should drop to the floor just as prices have. That said, in many part of the country, there’s just too many damn housing units.
Comment by oxide
2011-09-19 12:41:06
In my little hood, one family moved out about a week ago. On Saturday they replaced the carpet. It wouldn’t surprise me if they had another renter already lined up. And rents are only going up, across the board. They will NEVER go down as long as there is capacity for families to shack up and/or get government rental cheese.
Comment by Moman
2011-09-19 13:23:55
Just two years ago, in 2009, everyone was crowing about how rents were dropping in apartment homes. Not huge declines, per se, but going down. Here’s an article to refresh your memory.
Rents in many areas (not all) would be going down now if foreclosures were completed in a timely manner.
U.S. apartment rents fell in the fourth quarter from the third as the national vacancy rate climbed to a four-year high of 6.6 percent, according to a report just published by Reis Inc., a New York-based research firm.
The report defies the expectation that apartments would benefit from the housing slump as job losses and lower wages are cutting into the pool of potential renters in their twenties and thirties.
Asking rents fell 0.1 percent from the previous quarter, to $1,052 on average, their first quarter-to-quarter decline in almost six years. Effective rents, what tenants actually paid, fell to an average $996 last quarter, down 0.4 percent from the prior quarter.
Vacancy Rate
The vacancy rate rose to 6.6 percent in the fourth quarter from 6.2 percent in the third quarter and 5.7 percent at the end of 2007. The fourth quarter matched the vacancy rate in 2005’s first quarter and was the highest since the fourth quarter of 2004, when it was 6.7 percent, according to Reis.
Vacancies increased in 66 of the 79 cities measured by Reis and effective rents fell in 54 markets.
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-09-19 14:32:24
The foreclosures for the most part are still full of people. When a home is foreclosed, that family moves out, and a new family moves in…it’s a game of musical chairs.
I don’t think you can point to what was happening in January 2009 as the predictor of the future. It’s like saying that given what happened to the Dow from March 2008-March 2009, clearly the stock market should be at Dow 2000 by now…
In California, vacancy rates for rentals peaked in Q1 2010 at 7.3%, and are now down to 5.1% (Q2 2011).
In Arizona, vacancy rate for rentals peaked in Q2 2009 at 15.5%, and are now down to 8.6% (Q2 2011).
In FL, 16.7% in Q2/Q3 2009, now 11.4%.
In NJ, 8.6% in Q4 2009 and Q2 2010, now 5.9%.
Nationwide, the peak was Q3 2011 at 11.1%, now at 9.2% (having been pretty steadily falling).
Comment by oxide
2011-09-19 15:42:54
So I’m supposed to keep renting because rents are falling .4%???? My rent goes UP 10% a year.
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-09-19 21:44:28
Oxide…he was quoting rents falling in January 2009…
“In our ‘hood (North County Coastal San Diego), the market seems to have fallen off a cliff. Very little is pending, and there are quite a few BOMs and listings removed from the market. Some homes that had multiple offers in the spring have been relisted, and they are now sitting without any offers at all.”
Interesting in the context of the U-T story this afternoon showing a large increase in defaults in August versus July. Is this the beginning of a rush to the exits by some of the lenders?
“Bank of New York Mellon filings in San Diego County increased from 76 in July to 403 in August, or 430 percent. Meanwhile, Bank of America pushed through more than two times as many defaults during that same time period.”
“The two lenders, known as beneficiaries in public records, accounted for the bulk of the county’s most recent month-to-month increase. Notices rose from 1,274 in July to 2,094 in August, or 64.4 percent. That’s the largest month-to-month percentage increase since December 2008.”
This seems to be a pretty consistent story at least for the month of August in lots of states in the West. I’m waiting for the next LPS “first look” press release (should be coming out about now), and their “Mortgage Monitor” to see what happened nationally. This is usually released to the public in the first week of each month.
I see over 10 foreclosure notices in the RB News Journal every week, all with the Poway zip code (92064). The typical default amount range is $500K-$1500K ($1.5m), with a smattering of lesser amounts thrown into the mix.
I mentioned the house around the corner that came on the market the other week — pretty much a dream home/location for us. We approached the sellers directly and made a verbal offer on the spot (we know the house, neighborhood, and all the neighbors). After having another offer we made get undercut by an “inside” buyer of the listing agent who got the house for ~$68,000 less than our offer, we’ve decided to ALWAYS approach the seller directly instead of going through the agent. From this point forward, all of our offers will be handed directly to the sellers.
Anyhow, the sellers are the heirs of their mom’s estate and they came from out of state to take care of her at the end and to handle the estate. The house was priced too high — we know the area and all the past listings since we’ve lived here for over 7 years — but I figured we’d make the offer at list and then let the appraisal do the negotiating for us. Well, as expected the appraisal came in lower than they wanted, but their agent is trying to claim that the appraiser doesn’t know what he’s talking about (he does, he’s spot on, actually).
This is a tract neighborhood, and while the lot is superior/large, it backs to a school that doubles as a park on weekends with soccer and baseball games, so you always have lots of noise from the school. We’re willing to pay a $25K premium for the lot, plus pay $10K toward our agent’s commission vs. an exact model match in a better location, but with a smaller yard. Not only that, but the listing agent of the house we want was the listing agent on the comp, but she is now claiming that it’s not a good comp! This is a tract neighborhood with very simple tract homes. Finding comps is not rocket science, and no houses like this have sold anywhere near their price in years.
We’re very strong buyers, agreed to a 10-day contingency, and can close in 2 weeks (the sellers want to get this done so they can go home). The agent oversold this listing to the sellers and gave them unrealistic expectations about the home’s value. Now, she’s trying to tell them that the appraisal isn’t valid. She has relisted the home on the MLS, but our contract was not officially cancelled.
I’m not signing off on the inspection contingency (expired last Friday) until she says we’re under contract, but she won’t commit. Now, the listing agent wants us to release the contingency. WTF??? I told her that the clock stopped ticking on our side when she put us on hold. We told her to get their own appraisal and my agent even offered to pay for it if we end up buying the house. At first, she said they wouldn’t do it because they had spent enough money on the house (it’s mostly original, they just cleaned it up), then agreed to getting their own appraisal. Will hopefully see what happens with it Monday.
Their agent is a fly in the ointment. The sellers and I were getting along very well, and I think we could get the deal done if not for their agent. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen agents get in the way of a transaction. They insist on controlling everything when they are not even a party to the transaction. I’ve sold properties without agents before, and they were so much smoother and easier on everyone’s part!
Give the sellers a copy of the offer and tell them to get back to you if things don’t work out with their realtor’s offers. And then walk away. I know it is hard and you really want this, but that’s the problem. You want it too much.
I hate saying it, but letting the appraisal ‘do the negotiating’ was a mistake; because you set the price in their mind by making the offer. Your offer suggests to those without knowledge of your motivations that you’re willing to pay that much; not that you’re using it as a foot in the door as a basis to negotiate further; meanwhile, the listing has been effectively off the market.
I’d guess there is a 50/50 shot the appraiser looking at the property today will hit the number.
I have to second Palmy & Bad Chile’s comments here.
We put in an offer on a 15-year-old house last January. It had been two weeks on the market, and the sellers were greedy. They countered close to full price & we walked. Soon after, they lowered their asking price to a price point below their counter-offer to us, and recently had a second (larger) price drop. Had we left the offer in their lap with a request to “call us when your agent’s contract runs out”, we’d own that property now. The current asking price minus commissions are very much in the ballpark of our offer.
Course, moot point now, since we bought a lot elsewhere. We’ll be building a house about the same size as that one was (maybe 100 sf larger, depending on what the architect comes back with), but our total costs (lot + construction) will still be thousands (perhaps tens of thousands) less than their current (twice reduced) asking price.
How much do you anticipate the construction cost for the house will cost per square foot ??
Comment by Kim
2011-09-19 08:58:04
The asking price of the house for sale is $174/sf. We can build for less than $150/sf (and that’s on the lux side).
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-19 09:24:50
Thank you Kim….
READ ALL ABOUT IT FOLKS
“Course, moot point now, since we bought a lot elsewhere. We’ll be building a house about the same size as that one was (maybe 100 sf larger, depending on what the architect comes back with), but our total costs (lot + construction) will still be thousands (perhaps tens of thousands) less than their current (twice reduced) asking price.”
Ms. Kim is building new for less than the cost of existing.
Comment by Kim
2011-09-19 11:28:01
“Ms. Kim is building new for less than the cost of existing.”
Yup. And I had zero-nada-zilch interest in building new, but we couldn’t buy an existing house for our price.
Ms. Kim is building new for less than the cost of existing ??
Yeah, but almost three times as much as the $55.00 per foot you have been ranting and chastising me about on this board…
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-19 15:01:33
………. Do the math. $50 per sq doesn’t include the lot. And I’ll wager Ms.Kim is close to 50-60 when her lot cost is deducted.
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-09-19 16:10:52
RAL, your cost per square foot was far less than $50-$60 per foot. $40’s per foot is what I’m hearing for public builders on a hard-cost basis.
What hurts for new developments, and separates different areas are:
Land Cost
Entitlement Costs
Development Costs (Curbs/Gutters, etc.)
Fees/Permit Costs
Before, you were saying that we were crazy to assume new construction would be $100 per foot…now you are saying that $150 per foot is perfectly reasonable?
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-19 19:01:50
I said “make money at $50 per square. Look it up.
And yes…$100 per square is BS. You just don’t know it because you’re not in the business.
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-09-19 21:48:01
$100 per square including:
Land
Entitlement
Development
Fees/Permits
If you are starting from raw land in CA, it would be a challenge to make a profit with sales much less than $100psf. You just don’t know because you’re not in the business in CA.
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-09-19 21:49:48
And by the way, I said above:
“your cost per square foot was far less than $50-$60 per foot”
This is consistent with making money at $50 per square. I don’t need to look it up…I agree with the record.
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-20 07:24:19
Anything in excess of $50 as square is earning profit. LOOK it up.
That agent just lost the deal for her very motivated sellers…all because of her attitude. The difference between our offer and what they countered was $13K. We are walking just to make a point to the idiot realtor.
Long story, but her appraisal came back and they didn’t even use any of the recent comps in our neighborhood! They tried to use sales from completely different tracts and with completely different ages and styles. Our appraisal used only recent sales from the same neighborhood, with the same style, age, etc. as the subject property.
Hope she rots!
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-09-19 19:37:08
This is just one more example of the corrupt, incompetent behavior of Realtor. Realtor is corrupt. Realtor is incompetent. Realtor cannot be trusted.
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-09-19 20:08:12
what if they tried to butter you up and dropped it $15K would you bite?
Comment by CA renter
2011-09-19 20:58:47
Yes. We made a very generous and firm offer. If they accept our offer, we will close escrow. The ball is in their court.
Comment by ahansen
2011-09-20 00:13:57
I’m betting you’ll get the house. Sometimes real litters don’t win.
Hang in there, CA. (And please keep us posted? This is getting exciting!)
No way. They take an ethics class and promise to uphold the values of the state assoc. & NAR. For the visuals, just add the bible.
(You learn ethics as a child. Period.)
Ca Renter
Firstly, don’t sign off on any contingencies unless YOU GUYS want to skip it, or release the liability (i.e. repairs, etc…).
I haven’t heard of an agent doing this before, so if I were you I would threaten her (and follow through) with the local board and the Ca DRE. As everyone has suggested, hold your ground. Truly, this agent is trying to pump her farm area. Using her prior listing as a negative comp and playing God. Screw this *itch.
I’m not sure if you have a signed contract that has been going back and forth legally, since verbal agreements aren’t valid in R E law in Ca.
(And the agent knows it.)
Keep us in the loop.
I agree about making the seller aware of your offer in person. We had things going on behind our back, that potential buyers knocked on our door and told us. We went to an online broker and saved $15K on the commission (as the seller-I didn’t want ot buy E&O ins/I’m licensed) and the REIC hated us. Thus they told their clients to comp our home, but they weren’t to think about buying it. We sold it.
Good article for the aging HBB coders. I was in the same boat shortly after Y2K. My shop consisted of semi-retired IBM guys padding their pensions and H-1B imports from India and Russia. When the smell of curry began to overwhelm that of Lectric Shave one could see the writing on the wall. Part of it was simply better technology, reports that once required Easytrieve could now be done with Office. Anyway, turning Forty and not liking my prospects (or coding for that matter) I bailed….
Tech hiring is tough on veteran workers
Keeping up with the latest gets ever-harder
Brewster Smith specialized in mainframe systems for 35 years in the technology industry, recently converting his employer’s mainframe to servers that use newer programming languages. When Smith completed the project in July, his company laid him off because his skills no longer fit the new system.
Elliott Kleinrock, a programmer from Burlington, Conn., who writes C++ code that “moves money around,’’ has been laid off four times since 1993, but has never had such a hard time finding another job. Kleinrock found plenty of job openings for Java programmers, but very few that matched his older C++ skills. After 10 months of looking, he recently landed a position at one of the dwindling number of companies that still uses C++
C++ is considered a dead language on the Windows platform, but certainly not in UNIX/Linux or in embedded applications. It seems that these days all Windows work is in C#, especially in the ASP.NET platform.
Mr. Kleinrock’s plight exposes the lie that there is a programmer shortage. As a C++ programmer he could be quickly retrained as a C# or Java programmer (they’re all Object Oriented). But employers only want experienced programmers, with 5 years experience in the language/platform du jour (even if it hasn’t been around that long). And when they can’t find them they demand more H1-B Visas.
There are still employers who are wise enough to bring in experienced programmers and train them in the newer languages.
Pretty hard to stay current when the technology can obsolete your career in one product cycle. Check out this new operating system from a company less than a year old.
(PhysOrg.com) — A Canada-based startup founded in November 2010 arrived at TechCrunch Disrupt last week to debut its “HTML5 operating system” called Carbyn. To get this system, there is nothing to install; you use your browser and you log in to Carbyn and you’re on your way. Beyond being an app, beyond being a web store, it is described by its founders as an operating system that happens to be app-focused. “It means you can get it on any device, they add, and “it means buying the cheapest tablet that gets you online so that you can get everything you want through your browser.”
A Canada-based startup founded in November 2010 arrived at TechCrunch Disrupt last week to debut its “HTML5 operating system” called Carbyn. To get this system, there is nothing to install; you use your browser and you log in to Carbyn and you’re on your way.
Maybe we need to define “operating system” here. In my world you need an OS already installed in order to “use your browser”. I googled the article and to me it sounds like they are talking about something that runs on top of what I think of as an OS.
Yet another “thin client”. Isn’t that basically what the Chrome OS is going to be?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by BlueStar
2011-09-19 08:38:59
Yes. What will happen over time is that the hardware guys will create dynamic CPU instruction sets to skip the Pcode step. When Java first came out back in 97 I was at the SigGraph show and they were talking about this stuff then.
if it were an operating system it wouldn’t need a browser to run in….
What OS is the browser app running in?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-09-19 09:17:04
Exactly. My guess is that they’ll have you install some minimal linux package first. I realize that typical end users think of the GUI as the OS, but it’s odd to me that techies would talk about it that way.
but it’s odd to me that techies would talk about it that way.
yeah. I love all this talk about a web-based OS, and all web-based apps. What’s the web browser built in? And all the device drivers? Is there an IDE that runs in the web-based browser? Can it compile millions of lines of code? Can you do multi-threading in the browser-based OS?
I’m all for pursuing different approaches, but really get frustrated by talks of something like this being the panacea.
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-09-19 11:28:53
What’s the web browser built in? And all the device drivers? Is there an IDE that runs in the web-based browser? Can it compile millions of lines of code? Can you do multi-threading in the browser-based OS?
Now you’re talkin’!
In short, the web-based browser still needs something underneath to guide the operation of the device that’s displaying the browser. That would be your OS.
Cloud apps? Talk about unclear on the concept of having a PC in the first place.
And what happens when the provider gets hacked (rare) or you can’t connect (common)? Yep, yer effed.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2011-09-19 21:06:34
What happens if we just like to have our own property on our own computers? Why do we need to have our private information stored in some other location, controlled by other people?
Mr. Kleinrock’s plight exposes the lie that there is a programmer shortage. As a C++ programmer he could be quickly retrained as a C# or Java programmer (they’re all Object Oriented). But employers only want experienced programmers, with 5 years experience in the language/platform du jour (even if it hasn’t been around that long). And when they can’t find them they demand more H1-B Visas.
I use mostly straight C for kernel/driver and embedded work, and Java for most everything else. Anybody using C/C++ should be able to move into java without much trouble. But for my whole career I’ve seen the same thing you describe.
Hey what ever happened to ADA? Talk about waste in Government. I bet the DoD and the defense industry spent billions trying to force-fit this in to every branch of the service. You want to see what happened check out the F-22. It had at least 2 crashes blamed on software errors. I don’t know if ADA was directly involved but it was a real pain in the butt.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Moman
2011-09-19 12:46:00
ADA is the language used in all Boeing commercial aircraft. It works very well for it’s purpose.
Anybody using C/C++ should be able to move into java without much trouble.
True, but there’s still much value in C++ development. It’s certainly not a dead language.
My company, which is ~8 years old and is growing roughly 100% year over year uses C++ for our products. It’s exactly what we need. Of course we also use java, javascript, and ruby…
I would imagine that a 10+ year C++ veteren could learn a new language much faster than someone in India starting from scratch. Yet, it seems that India churns out precisely those skills that an H1-B position will want, and so quickly.
There are only two explanations for this:
A. India has a better faster IT-training system than the US does.
B. US companies are scamming the job listings and gaming the H1-B system for the sole purpose of bringing in cheap Indian labor.
I doubt that India’s IT training system is better. From what I’ve heard, the Indian education is based on rote learning, rather than creative thinking.
So, if your Indian-trained programmer runs into something that isn’t part of the rote curriculum, he/she is at a bit of a loss.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by frankie
2011-09-19 14:00:32
I work in IT (all be it not in the USA) and have and still have dealing with Indian IT staff. I would make the following observations
1. The best of them are very good.
2. The majority are not nearly as good and in many cases are poor.
The problems they face are similar to those facing the IT industry pre the year 2K. Jobs are to plentiful, wages are rocketing and staff are moving from post to post at an eye watering rate. You seldom speak to the same person twice and you will spend an eternity going over old ground (think Indian Call Centre but worse, much worse). This is further complicated by the fact you won’t speak the same language. I speak English (with an accent), they speak Indlish (with an accent). The majority of staff you speak with will be using a script or a database of know errors (dangerous in the extreme, because they won’t really know what they are asking you to do); it’s tempting to write of Indian IT, but then you run into one of the good ones (and they are good).
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-09-19 16:23:32
Jeez, all those programming languages. Talk about a Tower of Babel!
Well, Evolutionary genetics found a new tool + clever user:
It is believed to be the first time that gamers have resolved a long-standing scientific problem.
Online gamers crack AIDS enzyme puzzle:
AFP / Yahoonews
Developed in 2008 by the University of Washington, it is a fun-for-purpose video game in which gamers, divided into competing groups, compete to unfold chains of amino acids — the building blocks of proteins — using a set of online tools.
To the astonishment of the scientists, the gamers produced an accurate model of the enzyme in just three weeks.
“Games provide a framework for bringing together the strengths of computers and humans. The results in this week’s paper show that gaming, science and computation can be combined to make advances that were not possible before.”
Their target was a monomeric protease enzyme, a cutting agent in the complex molecular tailoring of retroviruses, a family that includes HIV.
“The ingenuity of game players is a formidable force that, if properly directed, can be used to solve a wide range of scientific problems.”
One of Foldit’s creators, Seth Cooper, explained why gamers had succeeded where computers had failed.
“People have spatial reasoning skills, something computers are not yet good at,” he said.
Everyone stop,…Turkey [aka "genetic model genius"] is about to reveal what genetic models he/she has solved in the last 3 minutes…quiet now here it comes…
When the smell of curry began to overwhelm that of Lectric Shave one could see the writing on the wall.
That is a hilarious way of putting it. Lectric Shave sure was popular with the geek set that should be about ready to retire now. I haven’t smelled it in years…but I’ve smelled a lot of curry.
All computer languages are 90% the same, you just have to learn some minor differences. If you are a programmer, just fudge your resume a bit. The guy hiring you probably won’t know the difference.
CA renter
Fabulous first post.
I’ve been wondering if NAR is fighting tooth and nail not to have the shadow inventory bundled to the investor wolves and to be rented out, or even a straight rental agreement through FHFA? Going forward, if anyone of the rental deals goes through, more agents will starve. Any opinion?
In east Ventura County the market is constipated. A trickle of new listings, mostly in bad locations or just overpriced fixers. I agree, low rates haven’t been effective in moving listings. Housing is still way overpriced.
I think that more agents will starve in the near term (fewer fix/flips in the near-term), but the market will become healthier faster, and so agents will get back to higher incomes sooner than they would if the rental homes were actually sold as fix/flips.
We are hearing of very strong tenant demand for rental homes in Southern California. From an investment standpoint, while rentals can produce an interesting cash flow at high single-digits per annum after expenses, this is not the reason the investors are buying the homes. They are buying with an expectation of being able to sell for more 3-5 years from now.
In other words, the buying of big pools of REO are essentially taking those homes out of the sale market for 3-5 years, ultimately reducing the supply of distressed properties on the market.
This obviously says nothing of demand, but reduced supply is one way to bring the for-sale market into balance.
Comment by Awaiting
2011-09-19 04:34:37
CA renter
Fabulous first post.
I’ve been wondering if NAR is fighting tooth and nail not to have the shadow inventory bundled to the investor wolves and to be rented out, or even a straight rental agreement through FHFA? Going forward, if anyone of the rental deals goes through, more agents will starve. Any opinion?
In east Ventura County the market is constipated. A trickle of new listings, mostly in bad locations or just overpriced fixers. I agree, low rates haven’t been effective in moving listings. Housing is still way overpriced.
—————–
Thanks, Awaiting.
We’re seeing the same thing. Inventory is way down, and interest rates are extremely low; but even these bullish conditions are not enough to spur the housing market this year.
Here in NCCSD (North County Coastal San Diego), housing is still way overpriced, too. I think sellers are trying to take advantage of the inventory/interest rate environment, but they don’t seem to understand that buyers are very, very nervous about the economy, both here and abroad.
As European ministers meet to find a solution to the euro zone’s debt crisis, one economist says the European Union must bail out Greece, as the cost of a euro breakup will be “colossal.”
“You have to do bailout. The cost of break-up is horrendous,” said Paul Donovan, Managing Director and Deputy Head of Global Economics at UBS told CNBC on Friday.
“We did a rough estimate…for a disastrous scenario like this, it can only be a rough estimate, but for a country like Greece to leave the Euro, it would cost it (Greece) between 40 and 50 percent of its GDP.”
UBS calculates that for a weak economy like Greece leave the euro zone, it would cost citizens between 9,500 and 11,000 euros in the first year, and 3,000-4,000 euros per subsequent year. For a stronger economy like Germany to exit, it would cost 6,000-8,000 euros per person in the first year of exit, or 20-25 percent of the country’s GDP, its says.
“You’re devastating trade, you’re devastating the banking systems,” Donovan said. This is not a fixed exchange rate. This is a monetary union… this is a huge problem.”
“Almost no monetary union has broken up in the last 150 years without some kind of dictatorship or military government or civil war. The cost of these are unimaginably high,” he added.
…
“We did a rough estimate…for a disastrous scenario like this, it can only be a rough estimate, but for a country like Greece to leave the Euro, it would cost it (Greece) between 40 and 50 percent of its GDP.”
I call BS on this one. Leaving the Euro would do wonders for Greece’s economy.
There would be massive inflation, but exchange rates could adjust to the point where Greek labor would be inexpensive, and their exports would then boom.
They would to be prepared to reduce their dependence on foreign imports, though; the costs of everything they currently buy from the rest of Europe would go way up initially.
Not sure the internationally-distributed Youtube videos of Greek rioters mixing it up with police are great for the tourism industry, though they might help make vacations more affordable to foreign visitors.
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-09-19 17:50:49
“What does Greece export?”
Modern Perpetual Global $overeign Nation debt template: aka: “Thee Olympic$”
We are waiting to see what the Greeks will do about all their national debt . Hope they just do the Iceland thing , and just say “”We prefer not to pay the greedy bankers”. And live to thumb their noses at them .
Merkel’s political partners were trounced in elections over the weekend. So, maybe it’s not a question of what the Greeks will or will not do but a question of what the Germans will or will not do.
Perhaps the Finns will follow their Nordic brethrens’ lead.
Europe’s finance ministers reach no accord on debt crisis U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner warns them to hurry, but his reception is less than warm. Greece faces a delay in getting the latest installment of its bailout money.
September 16, 2011|By Henry Chu, Los Angeles Times
…
Finland’s insistence on collecting collateral from Greece on its share of any emergency loans has stirred up strife within the zone and could delay, or even scupper, approval of the bailout. No breakthrough in discussions was achieved Friday.
..
A standing offer to “take out the catastrophic risks from markets” creates a moral hazard problem for systemically risky investment banks to make foolish speculative gambles, under the rational belief that bailouts will make them whole in case their gambles go bust.
BERLIN – The European Union will not decide whether to give Greece a new installment of bailout money until October, officials said Friday, lengthening the uncertainty about whether the troubled country will default on its debts.
Investors had hoped for a quicker sense about the direction of the bailout. Greece’s financial troubles are threatening to spark a wave of credit problems for banks and countries around the euro zone, drawing an unusual visit from U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to a meeting of European finance ministers in Poland Friday and Saturday.
Geithner’s attendance at the meeting is a sign of American worry about the potential for the European problems to set off another recession.
Geithner chided European officials over “loose talk about dismantling the institutions of the euro,” saying that “governments and central banks have to take out the catastrophic risks from markets,” Reuters reported.
On Thursday, the Federal Reserve decided to open its vault to other central banks in an attempt to avoid a credit freeze, in which banks are too afraid of each other’s balance books to loan each other the cash that helps lubricate the daily transactions of financial markets.
Markets continued to be buoyed Friday by the news, with Asian markets closing higher and most European markets up slightly in trading. But U.S. stock futures were lower ahead of the market’s open.
A bitter debate has emerged about whether the European Central Bank should support troubled countries by buying their bonds, which is outside its core mandate of fighting inflation.
Portions of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s fractious coalition have suggested that Greece may default, worrying investors.
…
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Wall Street was set to open sharply lower Monday, as concerns escalated over the possibility of a Greek debt default, while the spotlight in the U.S. will be on President Barack Obama’s plan to reduce the federal deficit.
…
Sept. 19, 2011, 12:00 a.m. EDT Lordly Geithner castigates Europeans Commentary: U.S., China take turns giving advice, some of it welcome
By David Marsh, MarketWatch
LONDON (MarketWatch) — He came, he saw, he castigated.
What a pleasingly lordly duty for the American Treasury secretary to turn up in Poland and rebuke the finest of Europe’s finance over their painful failure to resolve the euro debt crisis.
Forty years after John Connally, Treasury secretary under President Richard Nixon, famously told European finance ministers in Rome the dollar was “our currency but your problem,” Tim Geithner says the euro has become a problem for the whole world. Connally’s heir lectured the latest generation of finance ministers in Wroclaw on Friday that they should stop squabbling with the European Central Bank and curb a “catastrophic risk” to financial stability.
…
Apparently retired military will be added to the list of “goons and thugs” (actually, when you think about it, that is what they are paid to be, at least that’s what people in other countries think of our soldiers).
The life time officers deserve a bit of down-sizing all around . Remember the less then $300 a month for the Cannon fodder grunts ? most of them made a life for themselves in the real world , but lots of the Commissioned Officers never did .
I believe that would be for working in a war zone, no?
Personally, I wouldn’t do it, even for six figures.
They deserve everything they make, and then some.
If the oligarchs who send them off to war are able to reap billions in profits, I think the soldiers who made that possible deserve a piece of the action.
Of course, we could just do the right thing and stop trying to force our will on other countries…but that’ll never happen.
What do the authoritarian “conservatives” think about the clawback treatment for military goons? Seriously…. they meet the conservatives definition of goon.
Ah, but you see … the military are their goons. Goons who have been trained in the art of war and how to efficiently kill lots of people. The Teamsters are pikers by comparison.
I do worry about how millions of well armed, not afraid to use their guns, goons will react if their cheese is taken away.
Oh I see…. So there are some goons that are acceptable and some goon aren’t. Interesting.
We need to establish Goonery Rules. I really don’t understand the idea of acceptable Goons and non-acceptable Goons.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2011-09-19 14:14:18
bottom line is…most people generally suck.
union goons…management…democrats…republicans…white…black…rich….poor…smart….stupid…northerner…southerner…christian…atheist…jewish…muslim…patriots fan…lions fan…straight…gay.
i just have one label…those that suck and those that don’t.
People who do their “20″ usually aren’t the ones you need to be scared of, and usually they’re used to getting screwed over (unless they were in the Air Force :-)).
My personal opinion is that they earned every penny and should be the last to be cut, but I don’t think you need to be scared of retirees.
I don’t even care what subject your comment was tracking, but you can not continue to get away with making up your own facts.
The only authoritarians in this country are progressives…period.
I will provide a small list of Bans by progressives:
Gun Bans
Bans on Speech
Bans on Food
Bans on Food Ingredients in Restaurants
Bans on Happy Meals
Bans on Soda
Bans on Thought
Bans on Tobacco
Bans on Smoking in Bars
Bans on Smoking in your own home
Bans on Grocery bags
Bans on Drilling
Bans on Cars
Bans on Lawn Mowers
Bans on Coal Power
Bans on Alcohol
Bans on Lawn Darts
Bans on Blood Drives (HIV test is discriminatory)
Bans on Responsible Forest Management
Bans on Responsible Logging
Bans on Water use
Bans on Military Recruitment
Bans on security profiling
Bans on Books
Bans on the Pledge of Allegiance
Bans on Singing the National Anthem
“They will slaute smartly and drive on with their lives.
Compare/contrast with public union goons.”
Like these guys?
The Bonus Army was the popular name of an assemblage of some 43,000 marchers—17,000 World War I veterans, their families, and affiliated groups—who gathered in Washington, D.C., in the spring and summer of 1932 to demand immediate cash-payment redemption of their service certificates. Its organizers called it the Bonus Expeditionary Force to echo the name of World War I’s American Expeditionary Force, while the media called it the Bonus March. It was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant.
Many of the war veterans had been out of work since the beginning of the Great Depression. The World War Adjusted Compensation Act of 1924 had awarded them bonuses in the form of certificates they could not redeem until 1945. Each service certificate, issued to a qualified veteran soldier, bore a face value equal to the soldier’s promised payment plus compound interest. The principal demand of the Bonus Army was the immediate cash payment of their certificates.
Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, one of the most popular military figures of the time, visited their camp to back the effort and encourage them. On July 28, U.S. Attorney General William D. Mitchell ordered the veterans removed from all government property. Washington police met with resistance, shots were fired and two veterans were wounded and later died. President Herbert Hoover then ordered the army to clear the veterans’ campsite. Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur commanded the infantry and cavalry supported by six tanks. The Bonus Army marchers with their wives and children were driven out, and their shelters and belongings burned.
wikipedia
So, the party to indemnify the “TrueWealthie$™” have gone from 1928 “Reform”,….to 1982 “De-Regulate”,…to 2011 “Reform”.
Coming soon: “TrueWealthie$™” “Volunteer” to help America with their spinetaxes $upport $taff at gourmet bread lines.
Policies
Hoover entered office with a plan to reform the nation’s regulatory system, believing that a federal bureaucracy should have limited regulation over a country’s economic system. Hoover saw the presidency as a vehicle for improving the conditions of all Americans by encouraging public-private cooperation—what he termed “volunteerism”. Hoover saw volunteerism as preferable to governmental coercion or intervention which he saw as opposed to the American ideals of individualism and self-reliance.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-09-19 14:51:02
Yeah. How’d that work out?
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-09-19 14:59:19
Yeah. How’d that work out?
It didn’t. It also contributed to Hoover’s 1932 election defeat.
I can give you dozens of examples of public union goons acting badly in the last MONTH.
Face it - if you were to cut military pensions by 50% tomorrow - there would no violence or demonstrations. There would be no threats. They would still do their jobs.
For public union goons - they think it is their right to every dime of taxpayer money and will use all means necessary to keep hold of it. Including violence, intimidation, sabotage, strikes and putting the public in danger.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-09-19 09:49:57
“You are using an example from 80 YEARS AGO?”
Yes, I like to delve into the distant past.
Comment by MightyMike
2011-09-19 13:06:45
Face it - if you were to cut military pensions by 50% tomorrow - there would no violence or demonstrations. There would be no threats. They would still do their jobs.
So if a group of veterans and active duty service members were to peacefully protest pension cuts in front fo the Capitol or the White House, you would consider that to be a form of goonery?
Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-19 13:40:56
Face it - if you were to cut military pensions by 50% tomorrow - there would no violence or demonstrations. There would be no threats. They would still do their jobs.
You sure have a high opinion of our armed forces. I’m sure they’re well trained in the art of killing, and will obey orders from higher ups even if they are morally questionable.
But I also know that they are EXPECTING to get those pensions. And I doubt they will be too happy if they get stiffed.
FWIW, history is rife with Military Coups. They aren’t the Saints you make them out to be.
Comment by In Colorado
2011-09-19 13:44:24
“You are using an example from 80 YEARS AGO?”
It was the last time the FedGov tried to stiff the military retirees. Thise who ignore history are bound to repeat it.
His treatment of the Bonus Army was one of the key non-economic factors that doomed Hoover in the 1932 re-election. As if his handling of the economy wasn’t enough.
“They will slaute smartly and drive on with their lives.”
I hope you’re right, but I doubt it. I knew way too many military double dippers when I lived in San Diego. And for most the second dip was also a FedGov or state job. Many were quite smug about all their pensions
20 years in the service, the “preferential treatment” when applying for any open government positions. Lots of ex-military guys in the FAA and various law enforcement establishment.
Then, a lot of those 20 year guys go fly/work for the Air Guard, and add time on to the 20.
Biggest house completed in my old nabe in the past 10 years was one built by a retired (at 55) Air Guard Brigadier General. He flew tankers, so he never came withing 500 miles of a SAM launch.
JMO, but I think military retiree benefits should work off a “points” scale. IOW, a guy spending 20 years in the jungle eating snakes should get a better retirement package than a guy who spent 20 years stocking shelves at the BX in San Antonio.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-09-19 14:55:02
Usually, it is that way. 90% of the time. But just like anywhere else, you have those remaining few who know how to work the system.
The choice should be simple, you either slash the defense budget by cutting these insane pet projects or you slash retiree benefits. If you saw what I have witnessed when attending these self serving defense contract shows in DC and Ft Lauderdale every year, you would get ill. I am so glad to be out of the business I was in as I was disgsuted at seeing defense contractor parasites milling around these shows and stroking every military influencer thery could get their slimy tentacles on. The money thrown about to keep selling these overinflated systems is sucking the lifeblodd out of our economy. Dwight Eisenhower was right about the MIC and what it could ultimately do to the country. If you ever want to see the largest gathering of slimy, whore parasites, go to the AUSA show in DC in October. You will need a Silkwood shower just to get the slime and stench off of your body. America at it’s worst!! I wish 60 min would infitrate this show and show America where their money is being squandered. Slash defense now and watch the country heal faster than you could ever imagine.
One snippet from Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 911 showed this in spades. A guy at a podium encouraged defense/security folks to cash in on 9/11 by jacking up prices on any stupid little thing: “whatever you ask for, they will pay it.”
They hate government, but oh will they ever take government money.
How else should they take out their displeasure on gov’t but to capitalize on it?
For one example of something that could make one dislike govt, I believe most folks were against TARP. Many even told their representatives, but were powerless to stop it.
“The protesters broke into the factory in Zhejiang province, ransacking offices and overturning vehicles before being forced back by police in a three-day protest that began on Thursday, according to state media reports. (We will) go all out to maintain stability and seriously deal with those who are suspected of violating laws in the incident in accordance with the law.”
Now that this is in the press I would not be surprised to see some company executives executed to placate the mob.
This is some hard evidence that China has had an economic policy to undercut our manufacturing base. China solar products should have a heavy tariff levied against them until this stops.
No the point was the complete disregard for the environment to give competitive advantage to the Chinese market share. Read the article and it says fluoride was the chemical in question. The same stuff in our water too and I filter it out of my drinking water with a reverse osmosis filter.
As a former organic farmer, “green” farming involves a little o’ the blue.
I mean that spraying copper sulphate on mildew-prone celery is common, almost necessary practice, to arrive at a product that had no powdery mildew. Nevermind the celery would turn blue! Especially used by the suppliers of large amounts of mono-culture organic.(Like the guys who sell to Whole Foods).
Plus organic farmers can not use commercial fertilizer; they use unprocessed poo for the most part (steer manure, sea bird guano, bat, chicken manure). It’s natural so hey it must be good for you, right? In terms of our farm; chicken manure was delivered; I know things got extremely pungent downwind when the shit hit the fan.
I mix soap with nicotine = nicotine sulfate good stuff kills everthing esp root mealy bugs but so does merit by bayer
‘Imidacloprid is the active ingredient in several widely used insecticides. Merit Insecticide ™ is used extensively in commercial plant nurseries as well as in lawn and landscape insect control. Bayer Advanced ™ branded insecticides are intended for the homeowner market and Premise ™ insecticide is use for termites and other structural pest control.
Imidacloprid is also the active ingredient in Advantage Flea Control and many agricultural insecticides. The chemical structure of imidacloprid (right) is a synthetic analog of nicotine, the natural alkaloid found in the leaves of tobacco and related plants.”
organo phosphates sold at HD don’t hardly work they are so over used at nurseries the bugs are immune.
see all the cool triva you can learn being a cactus farmer
The Chinese subsidize solar products to sell to the US and the US subsidizes installation. We were doing the same thing aimed at the European market, which was subsidized on their end as well.
Government subsidy generating malinvestment everywhere. Can’t we just keep our wasteful subsidies at home?
I don’t like subsidies. I am not getting any direct help in buying my system. There is a tax credit but it is my option to take it. My personal investment in solar energy explicitly excluded Asian products. 28% of the total cost goes to my local contractor using all american labor. Yes I buy american made products and I am happy to do it because more money stays here. I also own a Ford for the same reason.
Xian6pack will just have to deal, while their versions of the “Masters of the Universe” will get a free ticket/buy in to Uncle Sugar Land, where they will have a completely new group of peasants to kick around.
Trolls must be sleeping late today, as they seem to be missing in action.
It’s funny how I find them highly annoying when they post here, yet miss their company when they are absent. I even occasionally yearn to hear from Eddie — I could use some reassurances just about now about how the stock market is about to take off to the upside.
Did you get the memo? The republicans have declared Class Warfare. All the troops are down at the gun shop stocking up so they can defend the top 2% of the… Job Creators.
How many goons do we have here on the blog? I’m not a goon. Most of the guys on my site are goons though. Do you work with goons? Is your spouse a goon? How about your kids? Are they goons? Or maybe goony-goo-goo’s?
I used to be a union goon in the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. Me and my fellow goons built the most powerful military in history. My neighbor is a welder goon and a member of the pipe fitters union. Goons Unite!
PS: All my fellow workers had high security clearances and there was never a case of a union worker selling secrets to the enemy EVER. All the leaks came from high level management or sub contractors. It’s a fact Jack!
One of our offspring is a goon, err public school teacher. But very much a goon mentality. Guess it’s just payback; I disappointed my partisan parents too.
I’m a former goon (public school teacher), my dad was a goon (though he fought against the union…still kept all the benies won by the union thugs, though), and my DH is a goon.
Home builders’ sentiment seems permanently stuck in the basement. It’s not the change (”dips slightly”) that matters here, but the permanently-moribund level.
Sept. 19, 2011, 10:00 a.m. EDT
Home builders index dips slightly in September
By Steve Goldstein
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes dipped slightly in September to remain in very low territory, according to an index released Monday. The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index fell by a point to 14, on a seasonally adjusted index where readings above 50 are considered good. The index, which correlates closely with single-family housing starts, has held between 13 and 16 for the last six months. Economists polled by MarketWatch had expected a 15 reading.
Interesting aside. Yesterday my wife wanted to replace a broken mini blind (58″ X 47″: white). Went to J.C. Penny’s as they had a sale going at 70% off. Standard item that we all bought in the 90’s, 2000’s for $20. The price was $190 but with 70% reduction only a mere $58. When did such inflation on cheap, crappy window products arise? I then went to Homedepot where they were still high at $38! I think I’ll watch garage sales.
The other thing we noticed was that Sear’s, J.C. Penny’s and other similar stores seemed to be getting rid of their section on bedding. Soon the mortar and brick stores will be e-online stores the modern version of J.C. Penny, Sears, and Montgomery Wards catalog store of yore.
Made in USA widget cost $10 wholesale, sold for $20.
Management goons found out they could buy an inferior widget from China for $2, price it at $17, grab market share on “price”, while increasing their profits 50%.
This works for a while. Until all your management goon competitiors move to China, and all your customers lose their jobs and can’t afford the $17 widget. Or the $10 widget. Or the $8 widget.
Duh no wonder why Fresh direct and the Unemployment office here will pay for truck driver training and almost nothing else…..and will subside your first few months of working….
FRANKFURT (MarketWatch) — Greece should begin an “orderly” default and voluntarily leave the euro in order to escape a “vicious cycle of insolvency, low competitiveness and ever-deepening depression,” economist Nouriel Roubini said in a guest column published Monday in the Financial Times. Other options, such as a sharp weakening of the euro, a rapid reduction in Greece’s unit labor costs or a rapid deflation in prices and wages appear unlikely or impractical, said Roubini, a New York University professor and chairman of Roubini Global Economics. While the process would be traumatic, a return to the drachma and a sharp depreciation in its value “would quickly restore competitiveness and growth, as it did in Argentina and many other emerging markets which abandoned their currency pegs,” he said.
I have an alternative idea. Let’s go back 2000 years and make Italy and Greece reunite. The new country could be called Christiana or Christland or some such. The debt would become the responsibility of the Catholic church and they could recover the costs by selling indulgences for past sins. They can have their own Tea Party by resurrecting the Spartans!
“The debt would become the responsibility of the Catholic church and they could recover the costs by selling indulgences for past sins.”
Wouldn’t work. Italy has the Roman Catholic Chuch and Greece is Greek Orthodox. Each has their own “management”, so to speak. I’m not sure Greek Orthodox even sells indulgences.
Nobody put guns to the heads of the bankers who made subprime loans to Greece — did they?
Transcript: Emergency Global Forum: Will This Debt Crisis Be Worse Than 2008? (Edited, as needed, for clarity)
Martin D. Weiss Ph.D. | Monday, September 19, 2011 at 7:30 am
Martin Weiss: We stand on the threshold of one of the most dramatic financial disasters of our lifetime: The default of the oldest democracy in the history of Western civilization — Greece — is threatening the largest economies in the history of civilization — the European Union and the United States.
I’m Martin Weiss, and this is the Weiss Research Emergency Global Forum. We’re here today to tell you what the consequences will be and what to do about it.
…
If I’m not mistaken, Goldman was heavily involved. Hence, no surprise Timmy is over there wagging his finger at Europe. Greece don’t pay, Goldman don’t get, Fed don’t get from Goldman. Simplistic, but I think that’s the gist of it.
They became a democracy in 1973. They are no where near being the oldest living democracy.
The basic ideas of democracy did form in those cities about the year 400 BC. but it was never a continous democracy. The basic idea is that people vote and all men serve in the military as volunteers.
Their foray into capitalistic banking practices is bound to end badly for Red China.
Sept. 18, 2011, 8:42 p.m. EDT More warnings on China’s debt
Commentary: Shadow banking sparks new worries
By Craig Stephen
HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — Three years ago, China’s banks were widely applauded as they lent their way out of the last financial crisis, hauling much of the world with them. But now with these loans coming due and interest rates on the rise, officials and analysts are increasingly sounding the alarm.
Throw into the mix new revelations about the escalation of shadow banking, and it’s little surprise “China” and “subprime” are increasingly talked about in the same breath.
So far, the loans causing most unease are with local-government investment vehicles, estimated at up to $1.7 trillion. Cheng Siwei, a former vice-chairman of the standing committee of the National People’s Congress told the World Economic Forum last week in Dalian:
Our version of the U.S. subprime crisis is the lending to local governments, which is causing defaults.
But this is by no means the only lending worry on the horizon.
…
After a summer of denial, reality has caught up with Wall Street strategists.
Having spent much of the year making ever-higher predictions for the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, and sticking to them through August’s turmoil, many strategists are now cutting their forecasts.
It is about time, some investors say—and a sign that expectations may now be better calibrated to the realities of a global market crippled by a European debt crisis and sluggish U.S. growth prospects.
David Bianco, a high-profile strategist left Merrill Lynch last week, just days after reaffirming his year-end target of 1400 for the S&P 500 and raising his 12-month forecast.
“At the beginning of the year, everyone was tripping over themselves to raise their S&P 500 targets, and now it’s the opposite,” said Scott Migliori, U.S. chief investment officer for money manager RCM, a subsidiary of Allianz Global Investors.
Goldman Sachs last Wednesday ratcheted down its end-of-year prediction for the S&P 500 to 1250, from its previous forecast of 1400. Last Monday, Wells Fargo dropped its forecast to 1250 from 1390. And on Friday, Citigroup lowered its target to 1325 from 1400.
The S&P 500 ended last week at 1216.01, which leaves most of the predictions still looking relatively bullish. Strategists on average expect the S&P 500 to end the year at 1309, according to Birinyi Associates—a rise of 7.6% from Friday’s close through year end.
At the beginning of 2011, strategists were looking for an 8.5% gain for the entire year, predicting a year-end close of 1365.
…
It is about time, some investors say—and a sign that expectations may now be better calibrated to the realities of a global market crippled by a European debt crisis and sluggish U.S. growth prospects.
But I thought that those billions of impoverished workers in the 3rd world were going to pick up the slack and buy stuff. What happened?
Week Ahead: Fed Expected to Launch New Program While Europe Debt Troubles Bubble
By: Patti Domm CNBC Executive News Editor
The Fed in the week ahead is widely expected to pull the trigger on a new easing program, as the European debt crisis continues to boil.
The housing market will also be a focus when new and existing home sales data is released Tuesday and Wednesday. New data this past week showed a jump in foreclosure starts, signaling that a big wave of foreclosed properties will hit the struggling housing market early next year.
The Dow and S&P 500 had their best week since July and second best week since July 2010, as European officials showed support for Greece. The Nasdaq did even better — jumping 6.3 percent, for its best week since July, 2009.
Market expectations are high that the Fed will announce a new program — dubbed “operation twist” — at the end of its two-day meeting Wednesday.
“Twist” is different than the much larger scale “QE2″ quantitative easing program which involved the purchase of $600 billion in Treasury securities. Fed watchers expect this program to raise the duration of the securities the Fed holds, not the amount. The program, in theory, could reduce long-term interest rates as the Fed buys more securities in the middle and longer end of the yield curve.
“It’s not their job to bail out the whole world, but next week there’s high expectations for the Fed,” said Nomura Americas Treasury strategist George Goncalves. The Fed this past week joined with the European Central Bank and others to provide more dollar liquidity for euro zone financial institutions.
European finance ministers ended their meeting in Poland with no signs of progress in handling the sovereign debt crisis. Some traders were looking for the officials to provide some clarity on the purchases of sovereign debt, which so far has fallen to the ECB. The euro zone countries are in the process of voting on enhancing the powers of the European Financial Stabilization Facility bailout fund, or EFSF.
In the coming week, the IMF meets in Washington and Europe will certainly be on the agenda. Ahead of that meeting, representatives of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are expected to meet to discuss whether they can help the European situation.
Meanwhile, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou canceled his trip to the U.S. He said in a statement that the coming week is “particularly critical for the implementation of the July 21 decisions in the euro area and the initiatives which the country must undertake.”
Inspectors from the IMF, EU and ECB will be working with Greek officials this week as they struggle to get approval for their next 8 billion euro funding tranche, without which Greece would default.
Has anyone thought about the pros and cons of taking out a 3.5% FHA loan, and just doing a strategic default if you need to sell?
The government is pushing this angle by creating the conditions which encourage it. It helps the banks and that is the goal of the government. The government is intent on dragging on the housing market price correction as long as possible, Japan-style.
I guess my question is - what is the blowback here, the consequences? I have some thoughts:
1) If you’re in a recourse state, they can garnish your wages or otherwise come you - true? If so, what can they do?
2) It will hurt job prospects because of the damage to credit rating - but what exactly would be the damage? If I have an 800 FICO and do a strategic default, what exactly will my credit rating be after this.
3) Security clearances - would a strategic default affect the chances of getting one?
4) Future home buying would be harder - true? For how long?
5) Future renting would be harder - true? For how long?
Other thoughts?
I’ve been renting for a while, and if the full force of the US government is to support the NAR (one of the largest political contributors) and the banks - is it time for “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em”?
3) Security clearances - yes it hurts if the clearance is DoD issued. It demonstrates a lack of responsibility on one hand and it maybe evidence the employee is a bit weak in basic reasoning skills for getting in such debt to begin with. If you had a security clearance before you might offset this mark on your record.
If you can’t beat them, join them… I think a lot of bubble-sitters have considered this. If the Fed/govt is so intent on forcing us into bad decisions, we might as well do what they’re rewarding us to do. Lord knows that being a responsible renter hasn’t worked so far.
First day back online after a trip to NW Montana to visit the spectacular Glacier National Park. We spent a day in Whitefish and Kalispell, which allowed me to play my favorite “Could I live here?” game.
The area appears fairly prosperous. Neat and tidy, very few empty storefronts. Tourism is big business both summer (golf, water sports, fishing, the national park nearby) and winter (skiing, fishing), along with ranching. I don’t know what else keeps the economy going there–oil & gas? Mining? Logging?. Home prices aren’t as low as I might have thought (far off the beaten path for a city dweller!) Particularly on the area’s lakes– Flathead and Whitefish–prices seemed astronomical. Saw one ad for a Flathead Lake waterfront home with a boat slip, asking price $399,500. That appeared reasonable until I saw another ad for the same property that specified it’s a CONDO. The few homes for sale on Whitefish Lake, which is on the edge of the cutesy-hip town of Whitefish, are in a similarly exorbitant seven-figure range as what you’d find in Chicago’s north suburbs on Lake Michigan.
As elsewhere, it’s all about supply and demand, with a dose of wishful seller pricing thrown in.
Hwy, do you mean there are celebrities who have homes there, like in Idaho and Wyoming? Or un-famous wealthy people? Or both? And how does an area get chosen to become a Blingville, anyway? Of course, this one has lakes, rivers, mountains and one of the most beautiful national parks nearby. So I guess it isn’t surprising. But I was surprised anyway.
Eyes mean all the above. Ultraouttastate Wealthie$ + Quasi-Wannabees lookatmyreallyhuge$helter + BuymyArtpiecestoday.
Montana is as close as the lower 48 America gets to BC Canada. (Hard to imagine the good folks of “Big Sky” country elected an Anti-American Democratic Governor who is a Gov’t fi$cal illusionist, unlike Preacher Perry in Texa$)
Elanor,
My property backs up to the Rockies south of Glacier Park. It’s one of the most beautiful places on the planet.
There is a relatively large group of people that have homes in the general area who can live anywhere they choose. Most don’t stay year round. Flathead lake is home to Maury Povich/Connie Chung, Phil Jackson (NBA coach), etc.
Whitefish lake has at least one of the Google boys who has a 20 million $ home there.
Most of the native Montanan’s live a relatively humble life. Really good people overall.
—— Obama to call for broad tax increases
Wants three dollars in taxes for each dollar of new cuts”
By Stephen Dinan
-
President Obama on Monday will propose a deficit plan that calls for about three dollars in new tax increases for every dollar in additional spending cuts as he seeks to put his imprint on the ongoing talks over reducing the government’s staggering debt burden————–
—Those HELOC for side business and rainy day use will getcha everytime—
Athena Kaiman at her Miami-area home. Falling prices are giving her pause about moving to Nashville, Tenn.
We continue our series today profiling buyers and sellers navigating the housing market. See past profiles.
Athena Kaiman is ready to leave the sun and sand of Miami for the country-music culture of Nashville, Tenn. Aside from her favorite musicians, Nashville offers affordable homes, low property taxes and proximity to an important business client.
But Ms. Kaiman, like so many other Americans ready to buy a home, is stuck. The problem isn’t just that banks are demanding a steep down payment. (She and her husband, who own a small book publishing-related company, have saved up enough money for that.) Falling prices are holding them back.
“We’re sitting on the fence, because however much money you have left over, the prices are sinking further and further, and you can’t see the bottom. It’s terrifying,” she says. “I would like to leave, but I am trapped here. I’m kind of heartsick about it.”
Ms. Kaiman lives with her husband and daughter, who is in law school, in a home she bought for $750,000 in 2006 on North Bay Island, which sits in Biscayne Bay between Miami and Miami Beach. She and her husband took out a home-equity loan as a rainy-day fund for their business, and are still saddled with $375,000 in house-related debt, Ms. Kaiman says. Meanwhile, home prices in Miami have fallen by more than half, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city composite index, to levels not seen since 2003.
When the economy worsened in 2008, Ms. Kaiman says, her bank ended her line of credit, without explaining why, a potential threat to her business. Even though she has a credit score in the 800s, Ms. Kaiman says lenders in Nashville are asking for down payments as high as 50%. Credit standards have tightened, and the couple are considered self-employed since they own their own company.
“I’m self-employed, but I might as well just say I’m unemployed when it comes to a bank,” Ms. Kaiman says.
Still, Ms. Kaiman could be tipped over the edge, she says, with the right incentive. She and her husband missed out on the first-time homebuyer tax credit, but if a lender offered loan incentives, she would consider taking the plunge. That would mean reducing fees and shaving points off of her mortgage, or a lower down payment — incentives that are sometimes offered by new home builders and their in-house mortgage units.
But barring those or another incentive, Ms. Kaiman says she’ll continue to wait until she feels better about the economy, or at least Miami’s housing market, to try and sell her North Bay Island home.
“I could probably do it if I were willing to put myself through it but … I would have to be willing to give up a good chunk of my life savings,” Ms. Kaiman says. “You don’t sleep. You’re in a constant state of agitation. You feel trapped … Where am I supposed to live?”
This one reeks.
At those price levels, $8K tax credit is an incentive only if you’re stupid.
If she bought a house for $750K, and houses have fallen to half, and she owes $375K, then she should be able to sell her home and break even exactly give or take fees.
If housing is so affordable in Nashville, then she should have no trouble putting $50K down on a $100K house. (oh wait, she probably doesn’t want a $100K house.)
If ending her HELOC is a threat to her business, then her business probably isn’t doing well enough for her to have a 800 FICO.
Just wait until someone has to pay back law school student loans…
North Bay Island is very nice. They should be able to sell the house tomorrow if the price was right. I would bet they want to recover their $750k investment so they will hold on until they can get it back, or are insolvent, whichever comes first.
I liked this response to the Florida Lady who cannot move away—
——This lady is nuts. I bought my Florida home in 2003 (mid-boom) and it is worth 20% less than I paid (it’s almost paid off though because it was within my means, not some exotic gamble dependent upon wishful thinking that homes will increase in value regardless of circumstances, in spite of the government’s best efforts to make it so. Sometimes sacrifices need to be made- I took an out of state job in 2006 and lived in an apartment 1/3 the size of my home for three years. Lifestyle took a hit, but I own my obligations. I tried to sell but the market had literally frozen at the time so I converted it to a rental property that almost was just a little cash negative. (three months earlier I could have stood in my driveway with a sign and sold the place). Of course, I drive a paid for Honda- boring as hell but it beats a $600/month payment on the BMW.
Too many people, including Baby Boomers that drove this train off the rails, (I’m a few years younger) seem to think that they should have no ramifications for poor decisions. The government shouldn’t have bailed out banks, and they shouldn’t bail out consumers, and perhaps this lady should “downsize” (egad!) and reassess her priorities. Remember people- its just stuff. Please spend your idle time at a Food Kitchen or some other environment in which people are truly struggling, not lamenting your inabliity to flip one luxury home for another.
———
Please spend your idle time at a Food Kitchen or some other environment in which people are truly struggling, not lamenting your inablity to flip one luxury home for another.
I called a local food bank couple of years ago if they needed any volunteers for the holiday season. The answer was if I belonged to a group, church or otherwise they would have me, but not as an individual. They also made a point that they were more than happy to accept my “individual” monetary contribution. Never felt so disgusted about “charity” organizations in my life……
There is a major problem with the entitlement mentality in this country. We each can do according to our own skills and ability. Too many people want to live on other’s skills and ability, and seeing get-rich-quick schemes such as real estate, stock trading, and other activities with marginal economic value, they have finally started realizing that the good old days of living on 120% of 100% of one’s income aren’t coming back.
Of the many financial reforms in Dodd-Frank, a requirement that lenders retain a share of the risk in mortgages they sell to investors seemed like a no-brainer. If lenders were on the hook, too, the thinking went, they would tighten standards and avoid the kind of defaults that contributed to the collapse of the housing marketand the financial crisis.
But now that a rule to implement this provision has been written, critics say the requirement will make it so hard to get a mortgage that it will further depress the housing market and undercut a struggling economy. “I’ve been in this business 32 years and I have never seen guidelines as tight as they are now,” said Scott Eggen, senior vice president for capital markets with PrimeLending, a mortgage lending subsidiary of Dallas-based Plains Capital Corp.
The proposal as introduced will literally erase a decade of accomplishment in defining what is a responsible loan,” said David Berenbaum, chief program officer with the Coalition, an advocacy group for community organizations that support affordable housing and equal access to credit. “It is going to narrow the range of loans that lenders are willing to originate to the point that only consumers with the best credit scores—meaning white and affluent consumers—are going to get loans.”
Regulators defined qualifying residential mortgages very conservatively, requiring a 20 percent down payment, caps on a borrower’s debt-to-income ratio, restrictions on loan terms, and other limits designed to restrict the number of loans that would qualify for the exemption.
Why is it that none of these braintrusts ever seem to consider no one but the rich being able to afford more homes than they could ever want to own will actually result in lower home prices and that their constituents would end up better in the end?
Yeah, I know, it actually isn’t about the constituents at all.
The proposal as introduced will literally erase a decade of accomplishment in defining what is a responsible loan,” said David Berenbaum…
————–
That’s funny. Is he trying to imply that the past 10 years have been a “decade of accomplishment in defining what a responsible loan” is? That’s truly side-splitting!
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Banks have stepped up their actions against homeowners who have fallen behind on their mortgage payments, setting the stage for a fresh wave of foreclosures.
The number of U.S. homes that received an initial default notice — the first step in the foreclosure process — jumped 33 percent in August from July, foreclosure listing firm RealtyTrac Inc. said Thursday.
The increase represents a nine-month high and the biggest monthly gain in four years. The spike signals banks are starting to take swifter action against homeowners, nearly a year after processing issues led to a sharp slowdown in foreclosures.
“This is really the first time we’ve seen a significant increase in the number of new foreclosure actions,” said Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac. “It’s still possible this is a blip, but I think it’s much more likely we’re seeing the beginning of a trend here.”
Obama Proposes New Czars
9/19/2011 | Lurita Doan | Townhall.com
As the Obama agenda proves increasingly impotent, Americans have witnessed Obama’s czars crash and burn or run for cover over the past thirty months. From Van Jones to Kevin Jennings to Nancy-Ann DeParle to Todd Stern to Ron Bloom, Obama’s style of management–bypassing the senate-confirmed agency heads–has failed to yield the results promised to the American people. You would think Obama would give up on the failed idea of using a curious collection of White House czars to manage complex economic and regulatory issues. No way.
Instead, in the American Jobs Act, Obama is proposing a new group of czars as a part of his “jobs” act– the American Infrastructure Financing Authority (AIFA) czars. President Obama’s newest czars will be given the authority to manage over a trillion dollars of federal funding for roads, bridges, buildings, waterways, dams and other infrastructure.
Here we go again. No doubt, Obama hopes that few legislators or American citizens will read the deadly details buried within the 199 pages of his proposed American Jobs Act that will establish this latest czar-ship, nor understand just how expensive AIFA is going to be.
As with Obama’s other czars, the AIFA czar comes with infrastructure requirements of his own: staff, office space and technology needed to perform the job. Managing what is in reality a trillion dollar budget is going to require a huge new staff that will, essentially represent an entire new federal agency. Of course, nowhere does President Obama tell us why a new czar is required to manage infrastructure projects. More importantly, Obama does not explain why the vast federal bureaucracy now responsible for these activities must be bypassed and a new, redundant agency is built.
Make no mistake: the AIFA Czar position is redundant. All of the infrastructure projects and tasks identified to be performed by Obama’s new Czar are already the responsibilities of the Senate-confirmed heads of Department of Transportation, the U.S. General Services Administration and the Department of Energy.
You won’t hear ANYONE in congress raise a fuss. The more the imperial presidency governs (this is regardless of which party holds the White House) the less congress has to govern, which allows congresscritters to devote their full time and attention to Job Number One: going out and raising money for their re-election campaigns.
BTW, you still think Hillary won’t be our next president? Maybe you didn’t read this.
Weren’t falling house prices supposed to lessen the property tax liability? What ever happend to the ’silver lining’?
(Crain’s Chicago Business) — If it seems like property taxes on your house have been rising while its value has been dropping, they have.
A new report being issued on Monday by the Civic Federation says that the “effective property-tax rate” on residential property — the percentage of a home’s real value that must be paid in taxes — rose in every corner of the metropolitan area in 2009, the latest for which data is available.
In Cook County, for instance, the effective property-tax rate on residential property rose 8.3% in Oak Park and 10.7% in Chicago between ‘08 and ‘09. Bad as that sounds, the numbers were far worse in the other 11 towns surveyed by the Civic Federation, ranging from 11.1% higher in Arlington Heights to 12.1% in Evanston, 17.1% in Glenview, 27.8% in Schaumburg and 28.5% in Chicago Heights.
“There are no give backs in public union contracts”
Just watched this happen in Palm Beach County. Not saying anything good or bad about public unions or anyone or anything else, but when you give something to someone (even if it is based on pure fantasy property values and propery taxes) it is really hard to take it away. Even after the fantasy tax values have collapsed.
Our assessed value dropped but only by a single-digit percentage (we bought a foreclosure at well under then-current market back in 2005). Based on the county website’s worksheet we expect our property tax to drop by about the same percentage.
The San Francisco Federal Reserve bank came out with a gloomy forecast last month. Its analysts said that stocks were likely to earn paltry returns over the next 10 years. The reason cited was simple enough; stockholders don’t live forever.
‘Demography is destiny,’ said Auguste Comte. ‘It works the other way around too,’ he might have added. If they thought they were going to live longer, America’s most ubiquitous age cohort — the baby boomers — might continue to buy stocks. Instead, the cold hand of the grave is on their shoulders and on the whole economy. The boomers are retiring at the rate of 10,000 per day over the next 18 years. They will sell stocks to finance their remaining years.
Old people have always been a drag on an economy. Migrating tribes left them behind. Eskimos put them out on the ice. Old people generally bowed to their fate with good grace. In times of famine, for example, they stopped eating so the young might live.
Mortality has doomed the stock market, says the S.F. Fed. P/E ratios will likely be cut in half. Investors are unlikely to see their stocks return to 2010 levels, says the report, until 2027. And this assumes that US companies will continue to grow profits as they did since 1954. Not very likely. Because democracy, energy, and financial quackery are destiny too. Jointly and severally, they are responsible for the biggest financial debacle in history.
This week, Deutsche Bank came out with a report of its own. It, too, is confident that the “Golden Age” — 1982-2007 — is over. In its place is a “Grey Age.” Instead of the nominal 12.8% gains of the Golden Age, investors have gotten returns of — 2.8% per annum for the last 4 years. Deutsche Bank expects stock market investors to lose about 10% of their money — in real terms — over the next 10 years, while the economy goes through 3 recessions!
But what would you expect? Everything droops. For the last 3 or 4 centuries the winning formula for developed economies and their governments has been simple: More energy. More output. More people. More credit. More promises. This formula has been so effective for so long people began to think it was destiny itself. It’s not. Instead, it is slave to destiny not its master.
By 2007, the slave was put in his place. The business cycle turned sour. Native populations in Europe and Japan are falling. Energy use per person in the developed world has leveled off. Private sector credit is shrinking. So is real private sector output.
The feds responded to this challenge as they had to every post-WWII slowdown. They added more — more money, more credit. The government itself spent more money and used more energy. But the economy did not react in the old manner.
An obvious reason: people are no longer as young and sans-soucis as they used to be. A young man’s eye may be drawn to fast German cars or slick Italian suits. But an old man can barely see at all. The baby boomers no longer roll their joints; they rub them. And they are no longer the source of an economic boom; now, they are the proximate cause of the bust.
But there’s more to this new Grey Age than demography. People too are subject to the law of declining marginal utility. They wear out. But so do even the most enduring and impressive economic trends. There were only 450 million people on the planet in 1500. It took 99,000 years to reach that level. Then, over the next 5 centuries — the population soared 10 times. Today, it is hard to find a parking place in any major city. How was such a big jump in population possible? Destiny was demography. With ready, cheap energy at hand, man could grow more food. And then he could ship it all around the world. And he could put his talents to work making more and better machines…which would vastly increase his output and his standard of living.
But the Machine Age ages too. The first tractors appeared more than 100 years ago. They may have increased production 10…20…100 times. Since then, improvements have been incremental, not revolutionary. We have bigger, faster, better tractors — that use more energy than ever.
Meanwhile, energy itself came to be more expensive. When the price of energy rose in the ’70s, the “30 glorious years” that followed WWII were soon over. Hourly wage rates stopped increasing and have not gone up since.
Yes, there is plenty of energy around. But it is net output that you get from energy that counts, not the raw output. If a gallon of gasoline costs $5…it must produce more than $5 in additional output or the economy gets poorer. As the price rises fewer and fewer new energy apps pay off.
Likewise, credit is subject to the law of declining marginal utility too. In 1950, an additional dollar of credit added about 70 cents to GDP. By 2007, the US economy was adding more than $5 of debt to produce a single new dollar’s worth of GDP. Now, the feds’ new credit inputs produce negative real returns.
If there’s anyone who’d be justified in using one of those, it would be my mother. Why? Because she was recently in a car accident with my dad.
They were making a left turn at an intersection with a traffic light, and some SUV/van/I’m not quite clear on what the other driver was in broadsided them. Dad’s car was totaled, and mom was hurt.
She says she’s okay now. Meaning that she’s not using a cane anymore.
I didn’t dare bring up the scooter topic. Why not? Because when I see her again, I don’t want her going into the closet and fishing out that cane so she can whack me with it.
In short, don’t get my mom started on scooters. Just don’t.
“Deutsche Bank… is confident that the “Golden Age” — 1982-2007 — is over.”
Strange coincidence that a former beknighted Federal Reserve chairman’s term closely mirrors that timeframe, and he was last seen in the employment of Deutsche Bank.
Historic central Pennsylvania seed company in danger of closing launches online campaign
ANDREW SHAW The York Dispatch
NEW FREEDOM, Pa. — A 227-year-old New Freedom company that at one point supplied seed to George Washington and is one of the oldest continuously operating companies in America is in danger of going out of business.
Now staff members are using a fervent online campaign and plea for help to help support the D. Landreth Seed Co., which needs to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars this fall to remain open.
Landreth started in Philadelphia in 1784 and moved around the region until settling in New Freedom around 2006 after being purchased by Barb Melera and her husband, Peter.
Landreth has long been well-known in the gardening world for its heirloom seeds, Melera said.
That’s not to mention Landreth’s introducing America to zinnias and the white-fleshed potato, among other achievements.
Now the company is in danger of folding because of more than $400,000 in loan payments to investors due immediately.
The money was originally due two years ago, and was caught up in courts until a judge recently ordered a freeze on Landreth’s bank accounts.
Landreth is hoping to raise at least $250,000 by the end of the month through donations and sales, particularly off its full-color 2012 seed catalog.
Without at least that much, the accounts will likely remain frozen, bills won’t get paid and 227 years of history and growth — in all senses of the word — vanish.
Melera said she’s not upset people who had lent Landreth money sought payment.
“These people have every right,” she said.
The money was due in 2009, and Melera’s plan to return the company to profitability was behind schedule because Landreth had several broken pieces of equipment and was way behind on technology.
“Accounting had been done on index cards. They were using a typewriter,” Melera said of how things were done before 2003.
The loan was to help update Landreth “after 75 years of neglect,” Melera said. The company has since become profitable again, she said.
Vendors and customers have both stood by the company’s side, she said with tears in her eyes, offering to make deals to keep Landreth afloat in the short-term.
“It’s been overwhelmingly positive,” she said.
The online campaign through Facebook has helped drum up about $50,000 in catalog orders, and about $800 has been donated.
The Huffington Post, as well as several gardening blogs around the country, asked readers to support Landreth as well.
Now Landreth hopes to get some big donors or investors willing to buy thousands of catalogs to help raise enough money to make up the significant gap.
The $5 catalogs are Landreth’s bread-and-butter, as the company specializes in 800-plus organic, heirloom vegetable, fruit and flower seeds hard to find in chain stores.
“It’s a resource if you want to know the history of the things you eat,” Melera said.
Plus, the catalogs are full of advice, something Landreth officials started including in the mid-1800s to help immigrants.
That’s what Melera said she is hoping to protect, more than just saving a locally owned and operated business.
“This is our legacy. It’s not the Enrons and AIGs. This is as much America today as it was 200 years ago,” she said.
“Accounting had been done on index cards. They were using a typewriter,” Melera said of how things were done before 2003.
Now THAT is old school.
But I can’t help but wonder why the upgrading of their accounting system requires a six-figure expenditure.
I mean, come on. There’s plenty of off-the-shelf accounting software out there. This company’s probably a bit too big to use QuickBooks, but there are packages out there that can handle mail order operations.
Slim wants to see the business plan that went with the pitch to outside investors. Something’s not adding up here.
They should declare $600.00 Pro-Bono Chapter 11 BK. Use the incoming donation’s as “seed money” for a new-old school family company with $2,000 worth of computers.
An increase in child abuse, mostly involving infants, is linked with the recent recession in new research that raises fresh concerns about the impact of the nation’s economic woes.
The results are in a study of 422 abused children from mostly lower-income families, known to face greater risks for being abused, and the research involved just 74 counties in four states. But lead author Dr. Rachel Berger of Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh said the results confirm anecdotal reports from many pediatricians who’ve seen increasing numbers of shaken baby cases and other forms of brain-injuring abuse.
…
“The counties studied included Pittsburgh and western Pennsylvania; central and southern Ohio; and a handful of counties in northern Kentucky and in the Seattle area. The researchers examined medical records and national labor statistics for 2004 through November 2007 and compared them with data from the recession.
Of the 422 children diagnosed with abusive head trauma during the study, roughly 65 cases occurred each year before the recession, versus about 108 yearly during the recession.
Federal government data suggest that the recession did not affect child abuse rates. But the study authors said those numbers are based on reports from child protective services, not medical diagnoses, and did not address brain injuries specifically.”
…
“Most parents who abuse young children aren’t “ill-intentioned,” he said. “Most of it is kind of just snapping…maybe being sleep-deprived and just losing it. It’s something that can happen to anyone. Economics is just another stress” that can increase the risks, Sherman said.”
Holding down several part time jobs could increase sleep deprivation. And stressed parents or hunger could contribute to fussiness in children.
I believe it’s their lack of English skills and rap music is designed to keep them there, why would good soul blues and clean music not be welcomed today?
Liberals vow to challenge Obama in Democratic primaries
By Seth McLaughlin
President Obama’s smooth path to the Democratic nomination may have gotten rockier Monday, after a group of liberal leaders, including former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, announced plans to challenge the incumbent in primaries next year.
The group said the goal is to offer up a handful of candidates from various fields and areas where the president either has failed to stake out a “progressive” position or where he has “drifted toward the corporatist right.”
“Without debates by challengers inside the Democratic Party’s presidential primaries, the liberal/majoritarian agenda will be muted and ignored,” Mr. Nader said in a news release. “The one-man Democratic primaries will be dull, repetitive, and draining of both voter enthusiasm and real bright lines between the two parties that excite voters.”
In search of candidates, Mr. Nader and the others sent out a letter, endorsed by 45 “distinguished leaders,”to elected officials, civic leaders, academics and members of the progressive community who specialize among other things in labor, poverty, military and foreign policy. The list, they said, also includes progressive Democrats who have held national and state office and have fought for progressive reforms.
“We need to put strong Democratic pressure on President Obama in the name of poor and working people,” said Cornel West, author and professor at Princeton University who has been highly critical of Mr. Obama’s tenure since helping him get elected in 2008. “His administration has tilted too much toward Wall Street, we need policies that empower Main Street.”
Mr. Nader and Mr. West are joined by Christ Townsend, of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, and Brent Blackwelder, president emeritus of Friends of the Earth.
President Obama’s smooth path to the Democratic nomination may have gotten rockier Monday, after a group of liberal leaders, including former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, announced plans to challenge the incumbent in primaries next year.
Ah, yes. Ralph Nader. The most famous person I’ve ever shot (as a photographer).
40% of consumers slash spending
By Deborah Brunswick September 19, 2011
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Worries about the economy and the stock market caused 40% of consumers to cut their spending over the past two months, according to a study on financial security from Bankrate.com.
Americans across all income groups reduced their spending in the last 60 days. Among those earning $75,000 a year or more, 37% cut back. And 43% of households making less than $30,000 spent less.
“This type of widespread cutback in consumer spending, if sustained for any length of time, is how recessions are born,” said Bankrate’s senior financial analyst Greg McBride.
Bankrate’s Financial Security Index for the month of September rose slightly from the previous month, indicating that Americans are feeling better about their personal finances. In August, the index fell to an all-time low amid the debt-ceiling crisis.
However, with 46.2 million people now living in poverty and median incomes on the decline, consumers are feeling less financially secure than they were a year ago.
Hustling ways to make extra cash
More Americans over the age of 30 reported a lower net worth compared to last year, the study found. And across all education levels, more people said their net worth is lower today than it was last year.
Job security was a big concern. Only 23% of respondents under age 30 said they felt more secure in their jobs than they did 12 months ago. Among those between the ages of 50 and 64, only 10% felt more secure in their jobs.
The house prices are heavily set by the monthly payment. If interest rates rise to 8 percent, prices will have downward pressure because of the monthly payment.
This is in someways a look back at Oly Gal…who viewed Zions Bank as the LDS bank of Utarrr….
There’s an empty “hole” in the most prime location in downtown Boise: the corner of 8th and Main. A building there burned down in 1987 - that’s 24 years ago - and developers who wanted to build there have all come a cropper.
Today Zions Bank announced plans to build a 15 story building there, which will house their Idaho headquarters.
Federal housing program faces barriers in Florida market
By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 10:24 p.m. Sunday, Sept. 18, 2011
A $15 billion housing program in President Obama’s recently proposed American Jobs Act may face challenges in Florida as similar federal plans toil to overcome a real estate market rife with investors and light on lending.
Dubbed Project Rebuild, the program intends to spur construction jobs with grants to for-profit and nonprofit groups and government entities to buy, renovate and sell foreclosed and abandoned homes in hard-hit neighborhoods.
Florida could receive $2.7 billion from Project Rebuild, which also would allow money to go to homeowners through assistance programs approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The current Neighborhood Stabilization Program has pumped $6.82 billion nationwide to struggling communities hit by high foreclosure rates and with the same basic idea as Project Rebuild: Refurbish and resell.
There’s no question families have benefited from the program, which awarded its first grants in 2009. About 15 rehabbed homes in Palm Beach County have new owners or are leased.
But there have been barriers to success. Program administrators say they’ve been undercut by cash investors when trying to buy foreclosures and stymied by banks with tighter lending standards that exclude too many homebuyers. They also have struggled with competition from homes in nicer communities selling for comparatively low prices.
“It creates the perfect storm against trying to attain your ultimate goal, which is to put income-eligible households into homes,” said Mike McManaman, neighborhood stabilization administrator for Lake Worth’s Community Redevelopment Agency.
Palm Beach County’s take from three Neighborhood Stabilization allocations is about $90 million. Boynton Beach was awarded about $4 million, Lake Worth received $23.2 million and West Palm Beach has $6.4 million to spend. While there is flexibility on how the money can be used, including offering mortgages and building homes, much of it has been directed toward the buy-and-resell approach.
The Lake Worth CRA has closed on about 60 homes in a small area surrounding the city’s downtown and has completed renovations on five townhomes and one condominium. None has sold yet. McManaman expects to have a tally of jobs created from the work in October when the next quarterly report is due to HUD.
Nearly 300 jobs were generated with a portion of Neighborhood Stabilization money awarded to buy and rehab homes, according to the Community Land Trust of Palm Beach County, which is based in West Palm Beach. The trust was a recipient of federal money that flowed through the county. It has purchased seven homes, resold two and has two under contract. Another 11 have been purchased and are being rehabilitated but have not been resold.
But it also has wrangled for properties with cash buyers and faced other obstacles, such as imperfect inspections and appraisals coming in below the agreed-upon purchase price.
“For a first mortgage buyer, the condition of the home has to be excellent for the bank to consider it,” said Cindee LaCourse-Blum, executive director of the trust. “Items that haven’t been issues in forever are now required to be checked off.”
Wellington got about $680,000 through the county for five homes. The homes, one of which is in a gated community, have been on the market since May with no takers yet.
Assistant County Administrator Shannon LaRocque said the county anticipated some of the problems with reselling the homes. Not wanting refurbished but unsold homes, it put much of its Neighborhood Stabilization money into mortgage programs for homeowners who buy foreclosures.
As of last week, 73 homebuyers had received mortgages through the county plan.
“When you buy homes and sell them, so much is depending on the banks’ lending,” LaRocque said.
Still, the county has had to work out kinks. One of its plans was to offer supplemental or second mortgages to homebuyers. The problem was not enough homebuyers could get first mortgages. The county had to request a change in its spending plan, which LaRocque said took eight months for HUD to approve.
Her advice for Project Rebuild: Be more flexible.
“They have to be able to respond very quickly to change,” LaRocque said.
Dubbed Project Rebuild, the program intends to spur construction jobs with grants to for-profit and nonprofit groups and government entities to buy, renovate and sell foreclosed and abandoned homes in hard-hit neighborhoods.
———————-
Grants…so that flippers can, once again, destroy the housing market. Why can’t we just allow housing prices to drop to affordable levels to that people can buy them without having to stretch their finances and get all kinds of new, gimmicky loans?
How much do you want to bet that these govt-paid flippers are making crazy profits (or expecting to) with our taxpayer money???
Italy downgrade adds to eurozone contagion fears Standard and Poor’s drops credit rating to A from A+, blaming sluggish economy and ineffective government reforms Reuters
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 20 September 2011 00.59 EDT
Italy has had its sovereign credit rating cut by Standard and Poor’s , with the ratings agency keeping the country’s outlook on negative in a major surprise that adds to contagion fears in the debt-stressed eurozone.
The agency cut Italy’s government debt rating to A from A+ and said Italy’s economic growth prospects were getting weaker, with planned reforms by the government not expected to help much.
“We believe the reduced pace of Italy’s economic activity to date will make the government’s revised fiscal targets difficult to achieve,” S&P said in a statement.
Italy follows eurozone partners Spain, Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus in having its credit rating downgraded this year.
…
Is ‘intentional foreclosure’ ethical?
By Steve McLinden • Bankrate.com
Dear Steve,
I bought a home two years ago that’s now worth $120,000 less than I paid for it. Ouch! What’s more, the bank won’t touch a refinance. But I do have about $80,000 in savings. If I used it for a down payment to buy another home, then let the other go into foreclosure, could the bank come after the equity in the more recently bought home? Yes, it’s a shady thing to do, but I feel it’s my only option.
–Stephen K.
Dear Stephen,
I have been besieged with similar questions. First, it’s unlikely but not impossible that the bank would go after your equity in such a scenario. That said, I can’t in good conscience just say go ahead and arrange such an “intentional foreclosure,” even as the practice becomes increasingly common, particularly in parts of the country that saw huge artificial run-ups in home values earlier this decade.
The first effort on the part of borrowers should always be to seek loan remediation agreements with their lenders/servicers. However, based on media and trade reports, there have been relatively few good outcomes from attempting to do this. The reality is that there are tens of thousands of people out there in similarly challenging situations who are watching as homes just like theirs sell for far less than what they still owe.
I must note that there’s no absolute guarantee in most states that a buyer can just buy another house and walk away unscathed from the other one, aside from absorbing that big, ugly credit splotch, of course. That’s because states often give lenders latitude to sue borrowers in such cases.
However, such “recourse” practices are seldom employed these days because of the expense and the fact that people in these upside-down situations typically have little nonhousing wealth to pursue. Ironically, some credit experts say it will be faster and easier to re-earn a decent credit score after a foreclosure than after a bankruptcy — especially if you have established a new mortgage in the interim.
There are numerous blogs dedicated to the practice that you’re considering and some businesses, such as San Diego-based You Walk Away. Opponents to your strategy have called this “underhanded,” “cheating,” “unethical” and say that agents who facilitate this practice are just coaching people into bigger mistakes. Others say it’s the only way for some people to emerge as homeowners out of this mess.
Hopefully, there’s an important history lesson here for an industry that aggressively marketed so many risky low-down-payment or 100-percent loans with ARMs attached and a government that at least tacitly encouraged them. It’s actually an old lesson: The less skin you have in the game, the easier it is to walk away from the table.
If you do proceed, you would be wise to spend a little of that $80,000 nest egg on a legal representative to review your loan documents to determine if you will be on the hook for anything.
“We’re hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn’t anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site,”
I think they what happens to the animals will be shocking too.
PETA to launch porn site in name of animal rights
By Ray Sanchez
Reuters
Posted: 2:56 p.m. Monday, Sept. 19, 2011
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, no stranger to attention-grabbing campaigns featuring nude women, plans to launch a pornography website in the name of animal rights.
The nonprofit organization, whose controversial campaigns draw criticism from women’s rights groups, said it hopes to raise awareness of veganism through a mix of pornography and graphic footage of animal suffering.
“We’re hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn’t anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site,” said Lindsay Rajt, PETA’s associate director of campaigns.
Anger over Spain’s financial woes spread to schools as Madrid teachers strike over staff cuts
MADRID (AP) — Anger over government austerity measures spread Tuesday to Spain’s education system, as public secondary school teachers in Madrid went on strike to protest staff cuts.
The work stoppage in some 300 schools is to last at least two days and perhaps three, and teachers elsewhere in the country also plan strikes or protests this month against budget cuts.
Teachers say education should be spared as Spain tightens its belt to resurrect its economy, allay fears it might need an international bailout and reinvent itself for the future with a modern, educated workforce after the collapse of an economy fueled largely by a real estate bubble
“We are on strike to improve state education. It is not true that we are on strike because we have to work more. The timetable is the same as we had last year. What we want is better conditions for public teaching,” Pilar Hortal, a 57-year-old English teacher standing at a picket line in Madrid, told The Associated Press.
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
Ganzanging is the new gazumping: Latest peril in buying a new home (and 54,000 have fallen victim this year)
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2038972/Ganzanging-new-gazumping-Latest-peril-buying-new-home-54-000-fallen-victim-year.html#ixzz1YNfEP0xD
The term is used to describe when a buyer is ‘left hanging’ as a seller pulls the plug on a deal at the last minute,
Many states (Ca for instance) make disclosure of the seller finding ” a home of choice” in the contingencies an upfront item. Buyers have way more outs than sellers. Any buyer who puts up w/ cr*p deserves their fate. Tighten up on seller escapes up front.
Hi Awaiting, I’ve noticed most of the homes for sale in Moorpark have Sold , only the most over priced are lingering on the market.
I don’t see this as a paticularly bear market in RE. where does the money comes from ? I do notice most of the people around here seem to be older Boomers while in Phoenix mostly gen X and younger. Phoenix RE has been going down steady since the bust in 2008 but here on the coast it seems to have bottomed. Older Boomers still may have some cash to buy around here ? Plus this is a fairly wealthy area and they say the rich are getting richier… although I would say simi has a fair share of public workers? just a guess.
They still flip homes here can you beleive it ??
cactus
Hello young man.
(OMG, I must be getting old.LOL)
The tight inventory is from people not making payments and coasting. I am canvasing for our home, and people are bragging to me they haven’t made a mortgage payment in years. Oh, how lovely for them. (NOT) Scumbags!
Rich to me is Lake Sherwood, North Ranch, and that level. Most of the area is living “big”. We use to live in 4,000 sq ft in Wood Ranch (remember?) and our neighbors were sinking in debt. They loved instant pools, furniture, new cars and SUV’s.(Addicted to credit.) We looked less affluent, but actually had $ and no debt. (God, I miss those days.)
Lots of illusion around this area. I’ve lived in it.
The flips that are moving usually have bad locations or bought from the inner circle of the REIC. Tight inventory and stupid buyers, imho.
Our buyer’s broker said to us (the idiot) just price it around $400K and it will sell. Regardless of size, condition, location, etc… We surely don’t trust him, but we cut a deal with him.
Moorpark has an excellent climate, but it’s not my flavor. I’ll tell you one thing, Thousand Oaks is the SFV circa 1983. ESL is the new normal.
san fernando valley english as a second language
haha really thats just old TO between the 23 and moorpak rd plus all the rest near TO blvd
yea you’re right it is !!! almost
Olsen Rd Wildwood, sunset hills, lynn ranch and that new stuff at the end of arboles near North ranch still pretty pricy
I work in Westlake Village pretty surreal wealth wise
I’m not really looking very much anymore too lazy to fight all the BS I’m sure to encounter trying to buy around here. My flipper friend says NEVER use an escrow company to make deals, they use some other method suggested by their RE lawyer. I think if I do buy I’ll hire a laywer because realtors are liars.
Ok, here is my housing bubble idea of the day. Probably everyone will especially hate this one.
whereas the tax deduction for interest on mortgage payments is unfair to renters and those who cannot afford to own and
whereas taxes on unreported rental income is “lost revenue” to the federal and state governments and
whereas the working poor of this country are in dire need of extra money,
I hereby propose that legislation be instituted to make the first $1000 of rent paid monthly per household ($12000 anually) deductible from gross income for calculating income taxes (and not a tax credit)in addition to either the current standard deduction or as an additional line in an itemized return, so long as total rent paid is documented by 1099 to the landlord and a copy attached via tax return.
What’s not to like about a proposal to at least somewhat level the Ownership Society’s unlevel playing field in renters’ favor?
Agreed.
It’s about time someone said something about the unfairness of our housing finance/tax system.
Corollary: If you live in a commercial complex which accepts Section 8 payments and/or military allowance: in return for dealing with your Section 8 neighbors, the landlord may only raise the rent on other tenants as specified by the county cost-of-living calculation.
I can sort of understand the concept of sprinkling the poor among middle class renters, and I don’t mind so much housing the poor, but I do NOT like the government effectively setting market rates for the rest of us.
oxide
I answered your posts from yesterday, and defined Transfer Disclosure Statement. Do you see it?
Not yet, I’ll have to look later. Busy day, but thank you.
Yes, just read it.
I bought one of the NOLO books a month ago, so I hope it helps. I’m currently reading a book for first time buyers (Ilyce Glink), and she is writing a few of the tricks but not all of them.
Or my idea….
Get your rent 1/2 off, if you live with Section 8 renters.
As partial payment/gratitude from the government, for setting a good example to all the Section 8ers……
(And as partial reimbursement for all of your stuff the Section 8ers trash or steal, but I digress…….)
landlords will love it! then they can raise it some mopre.
…more
landlords will love it! then they can raise it some more ??
Exactly….We talk here at nausea about how incentive-zing house purchases distorts the market…The same thing would happen to rents if you offered tax incentive’s…
at nausea = ad nauseam
“To a disgusting or ridiculous degree; to the point of nausea. [Latin ad, to + nauseam, accusative of nausea, sickness.] …”
Ah…You know what I meant…Not interested in a vocab lesson…
I realize that language is in flux and that we’d be speaking high German or something if it were not. Heck, I don’t even need to use vwls fr ths prt nd y wld gt th drft. However, you seemed like the kind of person who would appreciate the correct provenance of a commonly misused Latin phrase. Mea culpa.
And those landlords will STILL be deducting the mortgages on the property that they’re renting out, because THAT’S a business expense.
I think people over estimate the value of the mortgage interest deduction. The standard deduction is $ 11,400 for mfj, so the only benefit to itemizing (mort interest) is the level above the standard. For ex., $200k mort @ 4.5% is 9k plus other ded (taxes, cont).
The benefit on mortgage interest is another in a long line of lies sold by the housing mafia to get people to buy. 75% of Americans do not itemize but everybody says buying will save you taxes.
Plus, the standard deduction gets adjusted up regularly while if the loanowner’s proportion of payment to interest declines. Over time that delta’s going to shrink even more.
The MID is a big deal for some people. I’m in the 33% bracket, single, and have about 20K of mortgage interest and taxes to itemize this year. That’s a big deal (going from 5K to 20K), it’s probably going to “save me” about 5-6K this year to own this house (about 2 MTG payments are on Uncle Sam).
However, this is a benefit that flows almost exclusively to the upper income brackets. For someone buying a 150K house (which is what most of the country should be buying), they are going to see almost no benefit. And if you’re married, it’s even worse. My property taxes get me over the standard deduction in one fell swoop, every dollar of interest I pay is deductible.
However, all that said, this is kind of like welfare for the upper-middle class, and it’s SO twisted by Realtors when buying/selling houses (”Think of all the money you’ll save on taxes”, to a family with 2 children looking at a 150K house)..
I’ve mentioned this before, but there’s one demographic that doesn’t get mentioned here much for whom the MID is a big deal. That’s people who also pay tithing to their church in addition to borrowing for a home. Generally the tithing itself doesn’t exceed the standard deduction and the mortgage interest doesn’t exceed it by much, but when you put the two together it’s a big deal.
Plus you get to itemize your property and local income taxe paid too.
Also if you have high medical bills over that high hurdle.
Totally agree with you OT, but for the average Joe it is a no go. To further illustrate your point about it being for upper income only, how many middle income taxpayers have a vacation property/$120k motorhome/ etc.
“how many middle income taxpayers have a vacation property/$120k motorhome/ etc.”
The answer should be “about 0″. Vacation homes are another thing that’s really for the “rich”, not something that middle income people (even folks in the 200-300K/yr range) should really consider. Without appreciation (and nobody sees that in the immediate future) there’s simply no way that you can make a vacation home make sense compared to renting a place for the 2-3 weeks of vacation that most people get. Same thing with a motorhome.
“Same thing with a motorhome.”
Never got the motorhome fetish. It seems to come with old age, something to fuss over and brag about. I have two neighbors who each had cheaper MH, and then they both exchanged them for 5th wheelers. It seems to be some sort of competition.
RV are multi use rigs. They’re houses on wheels that *can* pay for themselves. I’m living in my 5ver during the week and netting $1000/month in per diem on it. We bought it in 2008 when the economy siezed up(a little over 50% of list price) and used it for pleasure for 2.5 years.
What’s a 5ver?
fifth wheel.
However, all that said, this is kind of like welfare for the upper-middle class
how is it welfare for the upper middle class when they’re the ones paying most of taxes anyway?
Who are the taxes they’re not paying due to MID being foisted on to?
(not that I agree with MID, but I’m not sure it’s welfare for a specific income group in any way)
It’s welfare for the upper-middle class because they are the only ones with enough interest/taxes to make it worthwhile to deduct. The lower-middle class is just usually “duped” into believing that their going to be helped by the deductions; typically be their loving Realtor.
Who’s paying the taxes that they (I) aren’t paying? Mostly renters. And lower income households.
Where else in the tax code do we have a system that provides a bigger and bigger break for more debt and more income? That system just doesn’t make sense, even though, for me personally, it’s great. Just because it’s good for me doesn’t make it good policy (IMHO).
Removing the MID would have the biggest effect on houses in the 400-1M dollar price range. That’s where most of the folks are that are getting BIG benefits from this tax policy.
Unfortunately (from a tax perspective) I’m getting married next year, so I’m going to lose a lot of the advantage. Still going to be worth 1000’s, but not the same as it’s worth to me this year.
Drummin refuses to admit that this really isn’t a “tax break.” MID is free money that has nothing to do with taxes.
Rather than set up a separate agency each time the government wants to hand out free money, the gov just uses the existing mechanism — the IRS — to hand out the money, mainly by subtracting from what you owe. That way there’s only one check in the mail. But it’s still free money, and still has NOTHING to do with taxes. So you can’t use the “I already pay too many taxes” argument (not that it stops them).
Drummin refuses to admit that this really isn’t a “tax break.” MID is free money that has nothing to do with taxes.
Dude, you really need to step back from the keyboard a bit. You’re attacking me directly why? Because I pointed out it’s not so much about income class as it is about homeowner vs not?
“Tax break” vs “free money” isn’t relevant to the comment I was making.
Dude, we’ve had this discussion before. Free money is free money, no matter how rich you are.
Now to be fair, I think there should be MID on primary home only, and for the first $417K of mortgage, regardless of how luxe the house is. That way everybody gets the same freebie.
We are paying about 8000/year in mortgage interest on a house we bought last year. Our interest paid comes nowhere near the standard deduction for mfj. I don’t know when the MID was put into effect, but I’m sure the interest rate was higher. In other words, if interest rates today were 8%, we would see a little benefit from the MID. I agree that MID law should be greatly modified, but perhaps it helped the middle class as well when it got started.
As a single guy living in a moderate to somewhat high tax state, the combination of state income and property taxes are about the same as my MID. But my mortgage interest is low and soon to disappear so it’s still not a big factor.
My benefit is less than half of what you would think it would be based on the math of the highest marginal rate, due to all sorts of limitations (AMT, etc.).
Sure, I’d like to have the MID rather than not, but it won’t be the end of the world if it goes away.
i’m a renter…i would prefer if you just left me out of your “plans”.
thank you.
Don’t you understand that it is your assigned duty as a renter to cross-subsidize members of the Ownership Society?
I don’t understand.. It would be a deduction… obviously you could choose not to take the deduction…
whereas taxes on unreported rental income is “lost revenue” to the federal and state governments
That’s a huge problem here in Pima County, AZ.
As mentioned umpteen times before, I go on Cycling Intelligence Agency rides around central Tucson. And Agent Slim has found numerous rental houses that are listed in the county assessor records as being residential owner occupied.
I’ve tried to report them, only to get the “lah-dee-dah” treatment down at the county government. Perhaps I should lift my game and report ‘em to the IRS.
You can fill out a form on the IRS website and get 10% of the IRS recovery as a reward for letting the IRS know.
Agent 00Slim licence to make a killing.
Why should those of us who scrimped and saved to buy a house with no mortgage, who take care of all our own maintenance and insurances, pay property taxes to educate renters’ kids, protect renters’ rights and property, provide renters’ social services and subsidies, repair renters’ roads and infrastructure, etc. subsidize those who did not?
Other than that, it’s an interesting concept with no chance of going anywhere in a time of diminished tax revenues.
Hansen, the renters are still paying every cent of property tax that you are paying in the form of the rent they pay that the landlord in turn pays in tax. I see no way in which “homeowners” pay tax that renters do not. Renters just pay it to the landlord who then passes the money along. These taxes would continue to be paid by renters.
The biggest thing I see here is if you subsidize something, the price will go up. So expect rents to rise if this ever passed. However, that might push us back in balance to owning a home being more affordable, so I actually see a win here for homeowners also.
” So expect rents to rise if this ever passed. However, that might push us back in balance to owning a home being more affordable.”
This exact scenario happened in DC about a year ago.
just for emphasis:
“Hansen, the renters are still paying every cent of property tax that you are paying in the form of the rent they pay that the landlord in turn pays in tax.”
I’d argue that many landlords are now subsidizing their renters –who pay a fraction of the actual costs of “owning” the property they rent until “the market turns around.”
2. Many retirees, for example, rent out properties at ONLY the property tax and the original mortgage, preferring the monthly loss to the hassle of keeping the place “up to commercial standards” (which let’s face it, is a higher standard that the average homeowner maintains for himself,) in essence, taking a loss for allowing you to live there on benefit of their investment. (I know I’ve been beneficiary of this largesse.)
3. Let us not forget “rent-stabilized” and Section 8 housing units. You’re seriously arguing that these pay for the Federal State, and municipal services they consume?
4. Churches, charities, foundations rent out donated properties for far less than they cost the giver. Again, the rest of the community picks up the loss to the tax base.
Shall I continue?
Please don’t think that I’m saying it’s not a fair concept. I was just asked to support a petition to forgive underwater student loans, too. An admirable idea, but it’s another give-away at the expense of the responsible that our country simply cannot afford until it gets its financial affairs in order.
I for one do NOT support forgiving student loans. How are you supposed to give knowledge back to the bank?
ahansen.. yes you should continue.. what percentage of rentals are giveaways where landlords are subsidizing the tenants? I can only guess, but being very generous I would say it is no more than 5-10% . Also, if you were section 8, in my world, this deduction wouldn’t apply due to being a competing program.
I am a firm believer in not letting perfect be the enemy of improvement. Also, no one is giving money away in this scenario. You would have to be paying rent to get the deduction. Business es deduct their lease and rental costs when doing business, but obviously can’t deduct a rental cost if they own. Seems to work perfectly fairly in that situation. OTOH, they are allowed to depreciate buildings.. can homeowners currently do this? I know landlords can expense improvements and repairs to the house/apartment…
Tax policy tends to favor the forces of stability. Homeowners are typically more invested in their communities than renters. They’ve built and supported the infrastructure, systems, agencies, services. Businesses and local governments are similarly encouraged, getting the tax benefits that encourage their establishment. (Theoretically, anyway.)
Renters are typically transient; coming in after the hard work is done and subsequently paying a premium for having it all there ready for their use and benefit– by the month.
If the mortgage is cheaper than rents, yet people can’t afford the mortgages now, how will they be able to buy?
What am I missing?
The point of this blog?
You got a point there!
Exactly right, mathguy.
Renters ARE paying the property tax in most cases. If landlords are in the red every month, one might argue they are paying for something, but for the most part, it’s the renters who are paying for the mortgage, taxes, repairs, etc.
This is in response to yesterday’s thread about more pending sales…
Interesting that you guys are all noticing an uptick in pending sales.
In our ‘hood (North County Coastal San Diego), the market seems to have fallen off a cliff. Very little is pending, and there are quite a few BOMs and listings removed from the market. Some homes that had multiple offers in the spring have been relisted, and they are now sitting without any offers at all.
If you’re seeing more activity in your areas, I’m quite sure it has to do with mortgage rates being near 60-year lows. From what I’ve seen, this is the first time in over 10 years of closely watching local markets that a drop in interest rates like this hasn’t spurred sales. As a matter of fact, it seems like the low rates and drop in sales happened about the same time.
Again, this is the first time I’ve seen this in over 10 years — there is a definite change this year. Even during the financial “crisis,” people were still out there trying to outbid one another in our area. Only in the second half of 2007 did we see a slowdown. Once the govt got involved in 2008, it was off to the races, once again.
IMHO, the second leg of the downturn has begun, and I think the political climate has changed enough that they won’t be allowed to throw money at housing in an attempt to keep prices artificially inflated. The risks have largely been shifted from the private market to the public, which means they can now allow prices to drop.
“If you’re seeing more activity in your areas, I’m quite sure it has to do with mortgage rates being near 60-year lows.”
That’s what I thought too. But seriously, by now people should be able to figure out the difference between affordable money and an affordable house.
Houses still aren’t affordable.
“Houses still aren’t affordable.”
Amen. Not only are they not affordable to most but they are so poorly built and designed that even at affordable pricing I don’t want most of what is now available or will be available. There are a lot of money pits out there.
Amen X2.
Houses are still not affordable, and neither are rents, BTW. We are lucky because I planned on this, so locked in with a very good LL back in 2004 who has not raised our rent (I’ve raised it once in order to retain control over the increases — they love us because of it, and it keeps them from rocking the boat).
Here in Tucson, the REIC’s trying to gin up some refi biz. From yesterday’s fishwrap:
How to get in on mini-boom in refinancings
With a total potential cost of $2,200 to $4,700, I can’t understand why people aren’t flocking to take advantage of this fabulous refi deal.
“IMHO, the second leg of the downturn has begun …”
And, IMHO, this second downturn won’t be limited to just housing.
“… and I think the political climate has changed enough that they won’t be allowed to throw money at housing in an attempt to keep prices artificially inflated.”
Nor will the political climate allow money to be thrown into the economy in general to keep the economy in general inflated.
And, IMHO, this second downturn won’t be limited to just housing.
Agreed. The first downturn affected a lot more than just housing.
The picture of the P-51 nose down about 50 feet above the crowd of spectators pretty much sums up the real estate market here in FL.
When do you think it will be “safe” to venture back into residential real estate in FL?
“The picture of the P-51 nose down about 50 feet above the crowd of spectators pretty much sums up the real estate market here in FL.”
SCHWEEET!
Not really.
Found out last night that my sister’s in-laws were at Ground Zero
Four of them have lose legs. One is still officially “missing”.
(Educated guess: She’s not “missing”. Just unidentifiable at this time).
This story sucks for reasons beyond what you will read in the newspapers. Wrongs done to this family, that will never have the chance to be put right.
One of my local friends (a former USAF fighter pilot) put up a very good blog post on this story.
Truly terrible news X.
My sincere condolences.
Four of them have lose legs. One is still officially “missing”.
Wow!…Geez,…reminds me of my motorcycle return trip from Alaska in 1979. I’ll post the details another time. Really stunned to hear about that fixr…
In an unrelated event to the horrific accident, many of the recent speculators in Florida housing will soon get killed financially.
Oh wait, nevermind, the Brazilians or are buying all the homes in .
” The risks have largely been shifted from the private market to the public, which means they can now allow prices to drop.”
OK, let the third inning start.
The government guarantees were not part of a program to let prices drop, they are aimed at keeping prices up and keeping the ponzi from collapsing.
The weight put on the taxpayer shoulder only bought time. Time seems to be our enemy. In 2008, we took a dive in a global updraft. Not so today. JMO, but we’d be better off if we had hit the chutes in 2008.
“The weight put on the taxpayer shoulder only bought time.”
Is there any way the federal guarantees could be put up to vote? Because I would gladly vote to rescind them and stick them back on Megabank, Inc’s plate, where they belong.
You bring up a good point C’BT. Elections are around the corner. Might be a good time to consider not supporting the same old bunch of cronies. Is there anybody running for Congress anywhere who is not taking $$ from the big monied interests? That’s the vote we get.
I think the govt guarantees were put in place to protect the monied interests who control our govt. They were not designed to keep prices high over the long run…only during the time it took to shift the risks/losses.
That’s done, which is why I think the next leg down begins shortly.
The low interest rates and high rents are bringing the monthly nuts close enough together that it makes a LOT of sense to buy. And don’t forget that areas like DC have a “jobs premium” on housing which didn’t exist 15 or even 10 years ago. Waiting longer will just ensure that houses in my price range will be even more trashed than they already are.
Sentiment is holding people back.
We’ve had people on this board note that it is not longer the ability to buy that is keeping them from purchasing, but the belief that values will continue to fall.
Said another way. If you assume 0%+ home price growth, in most places, the math says you should buy now based on rent levels as compared to mortgage payment (even including all other ownership costs). If you assume continued falling prices, then it doesn’t necessarily make sense to purchase, even if the monthly cost of ownership is somewhat cheaper. Of course, if it is a LOT cheaper to own, you can subsidize the losses with savings each month.
I personally believe that we are close enough to bottom in prices for markets with low vacancies and low inventory, that if you find a place that you really want to live in for a long time, and you want to own a home eventually, you should consider acting now.
But only in some places.
Only in the places that most of us would not want to live, and where you cannot walk around the neighborhood at night.
Keep in mind that you have to project future RENTS as well to see whether purchase makes sense. In a normal market, one of the reasons to purchase is the anticipation that rents will continue going up while cost of servicing your mortgage is fixed. Of course with the bubble and bust driven oversupply in housing, rising rents aren’t as inevitable as they were once thought to be.
In our dump (apt bldg) there are 8/20 vacant apts in our little courtyard, some being vacant over 1 year. I heard out of the 48 total units (total) 14-16 are vacant, and this is Thousand Oaks. Families are bunking up and new family formation is dead. I don’t think most LL can afford to raise rents.
Rents have been temporarily rising as the media have been so fond to point out. What they never point out, at their detriment, is that once the backlog of homes hits the market that rents should drop to the floor just as prices have. That said, in many part of the country, there’s just too many damn housing units.
In my little hood, one family moved out about a week ago. On Saturday they replaced the carpet. It wouldn’t surprise me if they had another renter already lined up. And rents are only going up, across the board. They will NEVER go down as long as there is capacity for families to shack up and/or get government rental cheese.
Just two years ago, in 2009, everyone was crowing about how rents were dropping in apartment homes. Not huge declines, per se, but going down. Here’s an article to refresh your memory.
Rents in many areas (not all) would be going down now if foreclosures were completed in a timely manner.
Rents Show First Decline in Over Five Years
http://www.american-apartment-owners-association.org/blog/2009/01/12/rents-show-first-decline-in-over-five-years/
by Apartment Building Management Insider
U.S. apartment rents fell in the fourth quarter from the third as the national vacancy rate climbed to a four-year high of 6.6 percent, according to a report just published by Reis Inc., a New York-based research firm.
The report defies the expectation that apartments would benefit from the housing slump as job losses and lower wages are cutting into the pool of potential renters in their twenties and thirties.
Asking rents fell 0.1 percent from the previous quarter, to $1,052 on average, their first quarter-to-quarter decline in almost six years. Effective rents, what tenants actually paid, fell to an average $996 last quarter, down 0.4 percent from the prior quarter.
Vacancy Rate
The vacancy rate rose to 6.6 percent in the fourth quarter from 6.2 percent in the third quarter and 5.7 percent at the end of 2007. The fourth quarter matched the vacancy rate in 2005’s first quarter and was the highest since the fourth quarter of 2004, when it was 6.7 percent, according to Reis.
Vacancies increased in 66 of the 79 cities measured by Reis and effective rents fell in 54 markets.
The foreclosures for the most part are still full of people. When a home is foreclosed, that family moves out, and a new family moves in…it’s a game of musical chairs.
I don’t think you can point to what was happening in January 2009 as the predictor of the future. It’s like saying that given what happened to the Dow from March 2008-March 2009, clearly the stock market should be at Dow 2000 by now…
In California, vacancy rates for rentals peaked in Q1 2010 at 7.3%, and are now down to 5.1% (Q2 2011).
In Arizona, vacancy rate for rentals peaked in Q2 2009 at 15.5%, and are now down to 8.6% (Q2 2011).
In FL, 16.7% in Q2/Q3 2009, now 11.4%.
In NJ, 8.6% in Q4 2009 and Q2 2010, now 5.9%.
Nationwide, the peak was Q3 2011 at 11.1%, now at 9.2% (having been pretty steadily falling).
So I’m supposed to keep renting because rents are falling .4%???? My rent goes UP 10% a year.
Oxide…he was quoting rents falling in January 2009…
That is not the story today.
It was almost 6 years to the bottom of the Saving & Loan disaster.
You can raise rents all you want. People without money are still people without moeny.
CA Renter…Whats your zip code ??
We are looking in 92009 and 92024, but I also watch 92057, 92025, 92084…and in L.A., I watch 91367 and 91307.
My parents noted to me that there are fewer homes available for sale in their master plan than ever before.
Nothing about sales volume, just very few listings.
“In our ‘hood (North County Coastal San Diego), the market seems to have fallen off a cliff. Very little is pending, and there are quite a few BOMs and listings removed from the market. Some homes that had multiple offers in the spring have been relisted, and they are now sitting without any offers at all.”
Interesting in the context of the U-T story this afternoon showing a large increase in defaults in August versus July. Is this the beginning of a rush to the exits by some of the lenders?
“Bank of New York Mellon filings in San Diego County increased from 76 in July to 403 in August, or 430 percent. Meanwhile, Bank of America pushed through more than two times as many defaults during that same time period.”
“The two lenders, known as beneficiaries in public records, accounted for the bulk of the county’s most recent month-to-month increase. Notices rose from 1,274 in July to 2,094 in August, or 64.4 percent. That’s the largest month-to-month percentage increase since December 2008.”
Link:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/sep/19/foreclosure-numbers/
This seems to be a pretty consistent story at least for the month of August in lots of states in the West. I’m waiting for the next LPS “first look” press release (should be coming out about now), and their “Mortgage Monitor” to see what happened nationally. This is usually released to the public in the first week of each month.
IMHO, the second leg of the downturn has begun”
Go Poway !! my landlord there assured me prices were going up when I left …
I see over 10 foreclosure notices in the RB News Journal every week, all with the Poway zip code (92064). The typical default amount range is $500K-$1500K ($1.5m), with a smattering of lesser amounts thrown into the mix.
Need to vent about lying, scumbag realtors.
I mentioned the house around the corner that came on the market the other week — pretty much a dream home/location for us. We approached the sellers directly and made a verbal offer on the spot (we know the house, neighborhood, and all the neighbors). After having another offer we made get undercut by an “inside” buyer of the listing agent who got the house for ~$68,000 less than our offer, we’ve decided to ALWAYS approach the seller directly instead of going through the agent. From this point forward, all of our offers will be handed directly to the sellers.
Anyhow, the sellers are the heirs of their mom’s estate and they came from out of state to take care of her at the end and to handle the estate. The house was priced too high — we know the area and all the past listings since we’ve lived here for over 7 years — but I figured we’d make the offer at list and then let the appraisal do the negotiating for us. Well, as expected the appraisal came in lower than they wanted, but their agent is trying to claim that the appraiser doesn’t know what he’s talking about (he does, he’s spot on, actually).
This is a tract neighborhood, and while the lot is superior/large, it backs to a school that doubles as a park on weekends with soccer and baseball games, so you always have lots of noise from the school. We’re willing to pay a $25K premium for the lot, plus pay $10K toward our agent’s commission vs. an exact model match in a better location, but with a smaller yard. Not only that, but the listing agent of the house we want was the listing agent on the comp, but she is now claiming that it’s not a good comp! This is a tract neighborhood with very simple tract homes. Finding comps is not rocket science, and no houses like this have sold anywhere near their price in years.
We’re very strong buyers, agreed to a 10-day contingency, and can close in 2 weeks (the sellers want to get this done so they can go home). The agent oversold this listing to the sellers and gave them unrealistic expectations about the home’s value. Now, she’s trying to tell them that the appraisal isn’t valid. She has relisted the home on the MLS, but our contract was not officially cancelled.
I’m not signing off on the inspection contingency (expired last Friday) until she says we’re under contract, but she won’t commit. Now, the listing agent wants us to release the contingency. WTF??? I told her that the clock stopped ticking on our side when she put us on hold. We told her to get their own appraisal and my agent even offered to pay for it if we end up buying the house. At first, she said they wouldn’t do it because they had spent enough money on the house (it’s mostly original, they just cleaned it up), then agreed to getting their own appraisal. Will hopefully see what happens with it Monday.
Their agent is a fly in the ointment. The sellers and I were getting along very well, and I think we could get the deal done if not for their agent. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen agents get in the way of a transaction. They insist on controlling everything when they are not even a party to the transaction. I’ve sold properties without agents before, and they were so much smoother and easier on everyone’s part!
I hate these idiotic realtors!
Give the sellers a copy of the offer and tell them to get back to you if things don’t work out with their realtor’s offers. And then walk away. I know it is hard and you really want this, but that’s the problem. You want it too much.
Be prepared to walk.
I hate saying it, but letting the appraisal ‘do the negotiating’ was a mistake; because you set the price in their mind by making the offer. Your offer suggests to those without knowledge of your motivations that you’re willing to pay that much; not that you’re using it as a foot in the door as a basis to negotiate further; meanwhile, the listing has been effectively off the market.
I’d guess there is a 50/50 shot the appraiser looking at the property today will hit the number.
I have to second Palmy & Bad Chile’s comments here.
We put in an offer on a 15-year-old house last January. It had been two weeks on the market, and the sellers were greedy. They countered close to full price & we walked. Soon after, they lowered their asking price to a price point below their counter-offer to us, and recently had a second (larger) price drop. Had we left the offer in their lap with a request to “call us when your agent’s contract runs out”, we’d own that property now. The current asking price minus commissions are very much in the ballpark of our offer.
Course, moot point now, since we bought a lot elsewhere. We’ll be building a house about the same size as that one was (maybe 100 sf larger, depending on what the architect comes back with), but our total costs (lot + construction) will still be thousands (perhaps tens of thousands) less than their current (twice reduced) asking price.
So stick to your guns!!! Good luck to you.
but our total costs ??
How much do you anticipate the construction cost for the house will cost per square foot ??
The asking price of the house for sale is $174/sf. We can build for less than $150/sf (and that’s on the lux side).
Thank you Kim….
READ ALL ABOUT IT FOLKS
“Course, moot point now, since we bought a lot elsewhere. We’ll be building a house about the same size as that one was (maybe 100 sf larger, depending on what the architect comes back with), but our total costs (lot + construction) will still be thousands (perhaps tens of thousands) less than their current (twice reduced) asking price.”
Ms. Kim is building new for less than the cost of existing.
“Ms. Kim is building new for less than the cost of existing.”
Yup. And I had zero-nada-zilch interest in building new, but we couldn’t buy an existing house for our price.
Ms. Kim is building new for less than the cost of existing ??
Yeah, but almost three times as much as the $55.00 per foot you have been ranting and chastising me about on this board…
………. Do the math. $50 per sq doesn’t include the lot. And I’ll wager Ms.Kim is close to 50-60 when her lot cost is deducted.
RAL, your cost per square foot was far less than $50-$60 per foot. $40’s per foot is what I’m hearing for public builders on a hard-cost basis.
What hurts for new developments, and separates different areas are:
Land Cost
Entitlement Costs
Development Costs (Curbs/Gutters, etc.)
Fees/Permit Costs
Before, you were saying that we were crazy to assume new construction would be $100 per foot…now you are saying that $150 per foot is perfectly reasonable?
I said “make money at $50 per square. Look it up.
And yes…$100 per square is BS. You just don’t know it because you’re not in the business.
$100 per square including:
Land
Entitlement
Development
Fees/Permits
If you are starting from raw land in CA, it would be a challenge to make a profit with sales much less than $100psf. You just don’t know because you’re not in the business in CA.
And by the way, I said above:
“your cost per square foot was far less than $50-$60 per foot”
This is consistent with making money at $50 per square. I don’t need to look it up…I agree with the record.
Anything in excess of $50 as square is earning profit. LOOK it up.
Thanks guys and gals.
We just faxed the cancellation.
That agent just lost the deal for her very motivated sellers…all because of her attitude. The difference between our offer and what they countered was $13K. We are walking just to make a point to the idiot realtor.
Long story, but her appraisal came back and they didn’t even use any of the recent comps in our neighborhood! They tried to use sales from completely different tracts and with completely different ages and styles. Our appraisal used only recent sales from the same neighborhood, with the same style, age, etc. as the subject property.
Hope she rots!
This is just one more example of the corrupt, incompetent behavior of Realtor. Realtor is corrupt. Realtor is incompetent. Realtor cannot be trusted.
what if they tried to butter you up and dropped it $15K would you bite?
Yes. We made a very generous and firm offer. If they accept our offer, we will close escrow. The ball is in their court.
I’m betting you’ll get the house. Sometimes real litters don’t win.
Hang in there, CA. (And please keep us posted? This is getting exciting!)
I heard somewhere that Realtors sometimes lie.
No way. They take an ethics class and promise to uphold the values of the state assoc. & NAR. For the visuals, just add the bible.
(You learn ethics as a child. Period.)
“They insist on controlling everything when they are not even a party to the transaction.”
You’ve just described every RE agent I’ve ever meant. Worse, they are exactly like this in every other aspect of their lives.
Ca Renter
Firstly, don’t sign off on any contingencies unless YOU GUYS want to skip it, or release the liability (i.e. repairs, etc…).
I haven’t heard of an agent doing this before, so if I were you I would threaten her (and follow through) with the local board and the Ca DRE. As everyone has suggested, hold your ground. Truly, this agent is trying to pump her farm area. Using her prior listing as a negative comp and playing God. Screw this *itch.
I’m not sure if you have a signed contract that has been going back and forth legally, since verbal agreements aren’t valid in R E law in Ca.
(And the agent knows it.)
Keep us in the loop.
I agree about making the seller aware of your offer in person. We had things going on behind our back, that potential buyers knocked on our door and told us. We went to an online broker and saved $15K on the commission (as the seller-I didn’t want ot buy E&O ins/I’m licensed) and the REIC hated us. Thus they told their clients to comp our home, but they weren’t to think about buying it. We sold it.
Realturds are truly scum, in my humble opinion.
Just faxed the cancellation.
Another reator botches up a transaction.
Thanks for your support, Awaiting.
Good article for the aging HBB coders. I was in the same boat shortly after Y2K. My shop consisted of semi-retired IBM guys padding their pensions and H-1B imports from India and Russia. When the smell of curry began to overwhelm that of Lectric Shave one could see the writing on the wall. Part of it was simply better technology, reports that once required Easytrieve could now be done with Office. Anyway, turning Forty and not liking my prospects (or coding for that matter) I bailed….
Tech hiring is tough on veteran workers
Keeping up with the latest gets ever-harder
Brewster Smith specialized in mainframe systems for 35 years in the technology industry, recently converting his employer’s mainframe to servers that use newer programming languages. When Smith completed the project in July, his company laid him off because his skills no longer fit the new system.
Elliott Kleinrock, a programmer from Burlington, Conn., who writes C++ code that “moves money around,’’ has been laid off four times since 1993, but has never had such a hard time finding another job. Kleinrock found plenty of job openings for Java programmers, but very few that matched his older C++ skills. After 10 months of looking, he recently landed a position at one of the dwindling number of companies that still uses C++
http://articles.boston.com/2011-09-18/business/30173049_1_software-engineers-technology-microsoft-windows
C++ is considered a dead language on the Windows platform, but certainly not in UNIX/Linux or in embedded applications. It seems that these days all Windows work is in C#, especially in the ASP.NET platform.
Mr. Kleinrock’s plight exposes the lie that there is a programmer shortage. As a C++ programmer he could be quickly retrained as a C# or Java programmer (they’re all Object Oriented). But employers only want experienced programmers, with 5 years experience in the language/platform du jour (even if it hasn’t been around that long). And when they can’t find them they demand more H1-B Visas.
There are still employers who are wise enough to bring in experienced programmers and train them in the newer languages.
Pretty hard to stay current when the technology can obsolete your career in one product cycle. Check out this new operating system from a company less than a year old.
(PhysOrg.com) — A Canada-based startup founded in November 2010 arrived at TechCrunch Disrupt last week to debut its “HTML5 operating system” called Carbyn. To get this system, there is nothing to install; you use your browser and you log in to Carbyn and you’re on your way. Beyond being an app, beyond being a web store, it is described by its founders as an operating system that happens to be app-focused. “It means you can get it on any device, they add, and “it means buying the cheapest tablet that gets you online so that you can get everything you want through your browser.”
www carbyn com/
A Canada-based startup founded in November 2010 arrived at TechCrunch Disrupt last week to debut its “HTML5 operating system” called Carbyn. To get this system, there is nothing to install; you use your browser and you log in to Carbyn and you’re on your way.
Maybe we need to define “operating system” here. In my world you need an OS already installed in order to “use your browser”. I googled the article and to me it sounds like they are talking about something that runs on top of what I think of as an OS.
Yet another “thin client”. Isn’t that basically what the Chrome OS is going to be?
Yes. What will happen over time is that the hardware guys will create dynamic CPU instruction sets to skip the Pcode step. When Java first came out back in 97 I was at the SigGraph show and they were talking about this stuff then.
if it were an operating system it wouldn’t need a browser to run in….
What OS is the browser app running in?
Exactly. My guess is that they’ll have you install some minimal linux package first. I realize that typical end users think of the GUI as the OS, but it’s odd to me that techies would talk about it that way.
but it’s odd to me that techies would talk about it that way.
yeah. I love all this talk about a web-based OS, and all web-based apps. What’s the web browser built in? And all the device drivers? Is there an IDE that runs in the web-based browser? Can it compile millions of lines of code? Can you do multi-threading in the browser-based OS?
I’m all for pursuing different approaches, but really get frustrated by talks of something like this being the panacea.
What’s the web browser built in? And all the device drivers? Is there an IDE that runs in the web-based browser? Can it compile millions of lines of code? Can you do multi-threading in the browser-based OS?
Now you’re talkin’!
In short, the web-based browser still needs something underneath to guide the operation of the device that’s displaying the browser. That would be your OS.
Cloud apps? Talk about unclear on the concept of having a PC in the first place.
And what happens when the provider gets hacked (rare) or you can’t connect (common)? Yep, yer effed.
What happens if we just like to have our own property on our own computers? Why do we need to have our private information stored in some other location, controlled by other people?
That’s just freaky to me.
sounds like citrix to me.
Mr. Kleinrock’s plight exposes the lie that there is a programmer shortage. As a C++ programmer he could be quickly retrained as a C# or Java programmer (they’re all Object Oriented). But employers only want experienced programmers, with 5 years experience in the language/platform du jour (even if it hasn’t been around that long). And when they can’t find them they demand more H1-B Visas.
I use mostly straight C for kernel/driver and embedded work, and Java for most everything else. Anybody using C/C++ should be able to move into java without much trouble. But for my whole career I’ve seen the same thing you describe.
Hey what ever happened to ADA? Talk about waste in Government. I bet the DoD and the defense industry spent billions trying to force-fit this in to every branch of the service. You want to see what happened check out the F-22. It had at least 2 crashes blamed on software errors. I don’t know if ADA was directly involved but it was a real pain in the butt.
ADA is the language used in all Boeing commercial aircraft. It works very well for it’s purpose.
Anybody using C/C++ should be able to move into java without much trouble.
True, but there’s still much value in C++ development. It’s certainly not a dead language.
My company, which is ~8 years old and is growing roughly 100% year over year uses C++ for our products. It’s exactly what we need. Of course we also use java, javascript, and ruby…
I would imagine that a 10+ year C++ veteren could learn a new language much faster than someone in India starting from scratch. Yet, it seems that India churns out precisely those skills that an H1-B position will want, and so quickly.
There are only two explanations for this:
A. India has a better faster IT-training system than the US does.
B. US companies are scamming the job listings and gaming the H1-B system for the sole purpose of bringing in cheap Indian labor.
I vote for B.
No vote required, it’s been proven.
I doubt that India’s IT training system is better. From what I’ve heard, the Indian education is based on rote learning, rather than creative thinking.
So, if your Indian-trained programmer runs into something that isn’t part of the rote curriculum, he/she is at a bit of a loss.
I work in IT (all be it not in the USA) and have and still have dealing with Indian IT staff. I would make the following observations
1. The best of them are very good.
2. The majority are not nearly as good and in many cases are poor.
The problems they face are similar to those facing the IT industry pre the year 2K. Jobs are to plentiful, wages are rocketing and staff are moving from post to post at an eye watering rate. You seldom speak to the same person twice and you will spend an eternity going over old ground (think Indian Call Centre but worse, much worse). This is further complicated by the fact you won’t speak the same language. I speak English (with an accent), they speak Indlish (with an accent). The majority of staff you speak with will be using a script or a database of know errors (dangerous in the extreme, because they won’t really know what they are asking you to do); it’s tempting to write of Indian IT, but then you run into one of the good ones (and they are good).
Jeez, all those programming languages. Talk about a Tower of Babel!
Well, Evolutionary genetics found a new tool + clever user:
It is believed to be the first time that gamers have resolved a long-standing scientific problem.
Online gamers crack AIDS enzyme puzzle:
AFP / Yahoonews
Developed in 2008 by the University of Washington, it is a fun-for-purpose video game in which gamers, divided into competing groups, compete to unfold chains of amino acids — the building blocks of proteins — using a set of online tools.
To the astonishment of the scientists, the gamers produced an accurate model of the enzyme in just three weeks.
“Games provide a framework for bringing together the strengths of computers and humans. The results in this week’s paper show that gaming, science and computation can be combined to make advances that were not possible before.”
Their target was a monomeric protease enzyme, a cutting agent in the complex molecular tailoring of retroviruses, a family that includes HIV.
“The ingenuity of game players is a formidable force that, if properly directed, can be used to solve a wide range of scientific problems.”
One of Foldit’s creators, Seth Cooper, explained why gamers had succeeded where computers had failed.
“People have spatial reasoning skills, something computers are not yet good at,” he said.
Mr. Rogers: “You are my friend, you are spatial.”
I remember when this came out. Solved in 3 years! Wow! That was fast.
I think it was three weeks, not years.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, is it?
First line of the article… “Developed in 2008 by the University of Washington…”
The video game was developed in 2008, which I guess works for any number of enzymes.
They plugged this particular AIDS protein into the game three weeks ago. Gamers solved it in 3 weeks. Sorry, lurkey…
Solved in 3 years! Wow! That was fast.
Everyone stop,…Turkey [aka "genetic model genius"] is about to reveal what genetic models he/she has solved in the last 3 minutes…quiet now here it comes…
When the smell of curry began to overwhelm that of Lectric Shave one could see the writing on the wall.
That is a hilarious way of putting it. Lectric Shave sure was popular with the geek set that should be about ready to retire now. I haven’t smelled it in years…but I’ve smelled a lot of curry.
“Anyway, turning Forty and not liking my prospects (or coding for that matter) I bailed….”
Bailed to do what instead, Hard Rain?
Yes, I often wonder what the future holds personally, since I am in a similar boat…
Yes, I often wonder what the future holds personally, since I am in a similar boat…
same here. Sadly I haven’t yet come up with a ‘plan B’ that I would find enjoyable. Perhaps DennisN took the right approach…
(speaking of which, haven’t seen him in a while…)
All computer languages are 90% the same, you just have to learn some minor differences. If you are a programmer, just fudge your resume a bit. The guy hiring you probably won’t know the difference.
Most places now require you to write some code as part of the interview process.
CA renter
Fabulous first post.
I’ve been wondering if NAR is fighting tooth and nail not to have the shadow inventory bundled to the investor wolves and to be rented out, or even a straight rental agreement through FHFA? Going forward, if anyone of the rental deals goes through, more agents will starve. Any opinion?
In east Ventura County the market is constipated. A trickle of new listings, mostly in bad locations or just overpriced fixers. I agree, low rates haven’t been effective in moving listings. Housing is still way overpriced.
“more agents will starve.”
What a great thought to start my day.
Karma at work.
I agree. I’m still interfacing with arrogant, self righteous agents and brokers. Nothing seems to humble these a-holes.
“Nothing seems to humble these a-holes.”
“Nothing” is what will finally do the trick.
“S’Wonder”, Cantankerous.
(Ira was a wordsmith.)
“What a great thought to start my day.”
Indeed. Emaciate them beginning with the blood sucking leeches that are Realtor. Then work up the food chain.
““more agents will starve.”
What a great thought to start my day.”
But they’ll starve because the houses are being artificially kept off the market, thus delaying the panacean Resetting of All Prices.
I think that more agents will starve in the near term (fewer fix/flips in the near-term), but the market will become healthier faster, and so agents will get back to higher incomes sooner than they would if the rental homes were actually sold as fix/flips.
We are hearing of very strong tenant demand for rental homes in Southern California. From an investment standpoint, while rentals can produce an interesting cash flow at high single-digits per annum after expenses, this is not the reason the investors are buying the homes. They are buying with an expectation of being able to sell for more 3-5 years from now.
In other words, the buying of big pools of REO are essentially taking those homes out of the sale market for 3-5 years, ultimately reducing the supply of distressed properties on the market.
This obviously says nothing of demand, but reduced supply is one way to bring the for-sale market into balance.
Comment by Awaiting
2011-09-19 04:34:37
CA renter
Fabulous first post.
I’ve been wondering if NAR is fighting tooth and nail not to have the shadow inventory bundled to the investor wolves and to be rented out, or even a straight rental agreement through FHFA? Going forward, if anyone of the rental deals goes through, more agents will starve. Any opinion?
In east Ventura County the market is constipated. A trickle of new listings, mostly in bad locations or just overpriced fixers. I agree, low rates haven’t been effective in moving listings. Housing is still way overpriced.
—————–
Thanks, Awaiting.
We’re seeing the same thing. Inventory is way down, and interest rates are extremely low; but even these bullish conditions are not enough to spur the housing market this year.
Here in NCCSD (North County Coastal San Diego), housing is still way overpriced, too. I think sellers are trying to take advantage of the inventory/interest rate environment, but they don’t seem to understand that buyers are very, very nervous about the economy, both here and abroad.
Realtors Are Liars®
America [AA+] Day: # 45
Funny how it is a UBS economist who insists on the need for a Greek bailout, given other recent UBS-related news.
Are the fear factors he raises real, or is he just talking Megabank, Inc’s book?
Greek Bailout a Must, as Cost of Euro Breakup ‘Horrendous’: Economist
Published: Friday, 16 Sep 2011 | 5:59 AM ET
By: CNBC.com
As European ministers meet to find a solution to the euro zone’s debt crisis, one economist says the European Union must bail out Greece, as the cost of a euro breakup will be “colossal.”
“You have to do bailout. The cost of break-up is horrendous,” said Paul Donovan, Managing Director and Deputy Head of Global Economics at UBS told CNBC on Friday.
“We did a rough estimate…for a disastrous scenario like this, it can only be a rough estimate, but for a country like Greece to leave the Euro, it would cost it (Greece) between 40 and 50 percent of its GDP.”
UBS calculates that for a weak economy like Greece leave the euro zone, it would cost citizens between 9,500 and 11,000 euros in the first year, and 3,000-4,000 euros per subsequent year. For a stronger economy like Germany to exit, it would cost 6,000-8,000 euros per person in the first year of exit, or 20-25 percent of the country’s GDP, its says.
“You’re devastating trade, you’re devastating the banking systems,” Donovan said. This is not a fixed exchange rate. This is a monetary union… this is a huge problem.”
“Almost no monetary union has broken up in the last 150 years without some kind of dictatorship or military government or civil war. The cost of these are unimaginably high,” he added.
…
“We did a rough estimate…for a disastrous scenario like this, it can only be a rough estimate, but for a country like Greece to leave the Euro, it would cost it (Greece) between 40 and 50 percent of its GDP.”
I call BS on this one. Leaving the Euro would do wonders for Greece’s economy.
There would be massive inflation, but exchange rates could adjust to the point where Greek labor would be inexpensive, and their exports would then boom.
They would to be prepared to reduce their dependence on foreign imports, though; the costs of everything they currently buy from the rest of Europe would go way up initially.
“and their exports would then boom.”
What does Greece export?
Olive oil? Feta cheese?
Kidding aside, it would make tourism a bargain, and that brings in foreign reserves.
Agree. Greece is already a great travel bargain, and will get even cheaper in the future.
The only trouble is all those beautiful young naked Swedes on the beaches.
Agreed. Greece would only benefit from defaulting and reverting to using their own currency.
Default is the only logical solution for all debtors who are in over their heads, IMHO.
“What does Greece export?”
1. Feta cheese
2. Olive oil
3. Olives
4. Vacations and related services
“Vacations and related services”
Not sure the internationally-distributed Youtube videos of Greek rioters mixing it up with police are great for the tourism industry, though they might help make vacations more affordable to foreign visitors.
“What does Greece export?”
Modern Perpetual Global $overeign Nation debt template: aka: “Thee Olympic$”
We are waiting to see what the Greeks will do about all their national debt . Hope they just do the Iceland thing , and just say “”We prefer not to pay the greedy bankers”. And live to thumb their noses at them .
Merkel’s political partners were trounced in elections over the weekend. So, maybe it’s not a question of what the Greeks will or will not do but a question of what the Germans will or will not do.
Interesting times.
Interesting times ??
Yep…..Going to be big winners and big losers again…Who & what will they be…
Euro coin$ = monetary uniformity
Tax Conformitie$ = left out of the euro-gang fi$cal design blue-prints.
Oops. :-/
Perhaps the Finns will follow their Nordic brethrens’ lead.
Europe’s finance ministers reach no accord on debt crisis
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner warns them to hurry, but his reception is less than warm. Greece faces a delay in getting the latest installment of its bailout money.
September 16, 2011|By Henry Chu, Los Angeles Times
…
Finland’s insistence on collecting collateral from Greece on its share of any emergency loans has stirred up strife within the zone and could delay, or even scupper, approval of the bailout. No breakthrough in discussions was achieved Friday.
..
The conundrum:
A standing offer to “take out the catastrophic risks from markets” creates a moral hazard problem for systemically risky investment banks to make foolish speculative gambles, under the rational belief that bailouts will make them whole in case their gambles go bust.
Privatize profits, socialize losses…
Decision on new Greek bailout funds delayed until October
By Michael Birnbaum, Published: September 16
BERLIN – The European Union will not decide whether to give Greece a new installment of bailout money until October, officials said Friday, lengthening the uncertainty about whether the troubled country will default on its debts.
Investors had hoped for a quicker sense about the direction of the bailout. Greece’s financial troubles are threatening to spark a wave of credit problems for banks and countries around the euro zone, drawing an unusual visit from U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to a meeting of European finance ministers in Poland Friday and Saturday.
Geithner’s attendance at the meeting is a sign of American worry about the potential for the European problems to set off another recession.
Geithner chided European officials over “loose talk about dismantling the institutions of the euro,” saying that “governments and central banks have to take out the catastrophic risks from markets,” Reuters reported.
On Thursday, the Federal Reserve decided to open its vault to other central banks in an attempt to avoid a credit freeze, in which banks are too afraid of each other’s balance books to loan each other the cash that helps lubricate the daily transactions of financial markets.
Markets continued to be buoyed Friday by the news, with Asian markets closing higher and most European markets up slightly in trading. But U.S. stock futures were lower ahead of the market’s open.
A bitter debate has emerged about whether the European Central Bank should support troubled countries by buying their bonds, which is outside its core mandate of fighting inflation.
Portions of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s fractious coalition have suggested that Greece may default, worrying investors.
…
It looks like traders who assumed a great big fat Greek bailout was “in the bag” are slightly disappointed.
Sept. 19, 2011, 8:00 a.m. EDT
U.S. stock futures sink as Greece worries mount
President Barack Obama due to unveil deficit-cutting plan
By Polya Lesova and Greg Morcroft, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Wall Street was set to open sharply lower Monday, as concerns escalated over the possibility of a Greek debt default, while the spotlight in the U.S. will be on President Barack Obama’s plan to reduce the federal deficit.
…
Suck ‘em in, shake ‘em out.
Buffet Rule.
Bailouts in Trillions
Taxes in Millions.
America still loses……..
But America loses less.
It’s only a small, necessary part of the equation.
Sept. 19, 2011, 12:00 a.m. EDT
Lordly Geithner castigates Europeans
Commentary: U.S., China take turns giving advice, some of it welcome
By David Marsh, MarketWatch
LONDON (MarketWatch) — He came, he saw, he castigated.
What a pleasingly lordly duty for the American Treasury secretary to turn up in Poland and rebuke the finest of Europe’s finance over their painful failure to resolve the euro debt crisis.
Forty years after John Connally, Treasury secretary under President Richard Nixon, famously told European finance ministers in Rome the dollar was “our currency but your problem,” Tim Geithner says the euro has become a problem for the whole world. Connally’s heir lectured the latest generation of finance ministers in Wroclaw on Friday that they should stop squabbling with the European Central Bank and curb a “catastrophic risk” to financial stability.
…
Save America: Ruin the Euro.
http://takimag.com/topic/commerce#axzz1YLJYnBu5
Sarcastic, but he does make a compelling case.
The Euro is what unites the EU and makes it the largest economic superpower, and therefore a theat to the usual superpowers.
For the usual superpoweres, this “just will not do.”
Apparently retired military will be added to the list of “goons and thugs” (actually, when you think about it, that is what they are paid to be, at least that’s what people in other countries think of our soldiers).
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44575140/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times/
“Military retiree benefits vulnerable as Congress struggles to cut debt”
I wonder how they will react to having their cheese taken away? I hope those guys remembered to save for their golden years.
The life time officers deserve a bit of down-sizing all around . Remember the less then $300 a month for the Cannon fodder grunts ? most of them made a life for themselves in the real world , but lots of the Commissioned Officers never did .
“Remember the less then $300 a month for the Cannon fodder grunts ?”
I have a cousin who was a sargeant (he’s retired now). He was getting close to 6 figures and a big chunk of his income wasn’t taxable.
I believe that would be for working in a war zone, no?
Personally, I wouldn’t do it, even for six figures.
They deserve everything they make, and then some.
If the oligarchs who send them off to war are able to reap billions in profits, I think the soldiers who made that possible deserve a piece of the action.
Of course, we could just do the right thing and stop trying to force our will on other countries…but that’ll never happen.
Not enough promised money paid out means many will have to somehow learn to do without.
This is what deflation looks like.
What do the authoritarian “conservatives” think about the clawback treatment for military goons? Seriously…. they meet the conservatives definition of goon.
Let’s hear if from the authoritarians…..
Ah, but you see … the military are their goons. Goons who have been trained in the art of war and how to efficiently kill lots of people. The Teamsters are pikers by comparison.
I do worry about how millions of well armed, not afraid to use their guns, goons will react if their cheese is taken away.
Oh I see…. So there are some goons that are acceptable and some goon aren’t. Interesting.
We need to establish Goonery Rules. I really don’t understand the idea of acceptable Goons and non-acceptable Goons.
bottom line is…most people generally suck.
union goons…management…democrats…republicans…white…black…rich….poor…smart….stupid…northerner…southerner…christian…atheist…jewish…muslim…patriots fan…lions fan…straight…gay.
i just have one label…those that suck and those that don’t.
Hey Mikey, that’s two labels -
People who do their “20″ usually aren’t the ones you need to be scared of, and usually they’re used to getting screwed over (unless they were in the Air Force :-)).
My personal opinion is that they earned every penny and should be the last to be cut, but I don’t think you need to be scared of retirees.
That’s nacho cheese man.
“Let’s hear if from the authoritarians….”
I don’t even care what subject your comment was tracking, but you can not continue to get away with making up your own facts.
The only authoritarians in this country are progressives…period.
I will provide a small list of Bans by progressives:
Gun Bans
Bans on Speech
Bans on Food
Bans on Food Ingredients in Restaurants
Bans on Happy Meals
Bans on Soda
Bans on Thought
Bans on Tobacco
Bans on Smoking in Bars
Bans on Smoking in your own home
Bans on Grocery bags
Bans on Drilling
Bans on Cars
Bans on Lawn Mowers
Bans on Coal Power
Bans on Alcohol
Bans on Lawn Darts
Bans on Blood Drives (HIV test is discriminatory)
Bans on Responsible Forest Management
Bans on Responsible Logging
Bans on Water use
Bans on Military Recruitment
Bans on security profiling
Bans on Books
Bans on the Pledge of Allegiance
Bans on Singing the National Anthem
It’s late, feel free to add more.
I wonder how they will react to having their cheese taken away? I hope those guys remembered to save for their golden years.
They will slaute smartly and drive on with their lives.
Compare/contrast with public union goons.
“They will slaute smartly and drive on with their lives.
Compare/contrast with public union goons.”
Like these guys?
The Bonus Army was the popular name of an assemblage of some 43,000 marchers—17,000 World War I veterans, their families, and affiliated groups—who gathered in Washington, D.C., in the spring and summer of 1932 to demand immediate cash-payment redemption of their service certificates. Its organizers called it the Bonus Expeditionary Force to echo the name of World War I’s American Expeditionary Force, while the media called it the Bonus March. It was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant.
Many of the war veterans had been out of work since the beginning of the Great Depression. The World War Adjusted Compensation Act of 1924 had awarded them bonuses in the form of certificates they could not redeem until 1945. Each service certificate, issued to a qualified veteran soldier, bore a face value equal to the soldier’s promised payment plus compound interest. The principal demand of the Bonus Army was the immediate cash payment of their certificates.
Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, one of the most popular military figures of the time, visited their camp to back the effort and encourage them. On July 28, U.S. Attorney General William D. Mitchell ordered the veterans removed from all government property. Washington police met with resistance, shots were fired and two veterans were wounded and later died. President Herbert Hoover then ordered the army to clear the veterans’ campsite. Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur commanded the infantry and cavalry supported by six tanks. The Bonus Army marchers with their wives and children were driven out, and their shelters and belongings burned.
wikipedia
President Herbert Hoover = “Lincoln” Republican
So, the party to indemnify the “TrueWealthie$™” have gone from 1928 “Reform”,….to 1982 “De-Regulate”,…to 2011 “Reform”.
Coming soon: “TrueWealthie$™” “Volunteer” to help America with their
spinetaxes$upport $taff at gourmet bread lines.Policies
Hoover entered office with a plan to reform the nation’s regulatory system, believing that a federal bureaucracy should have limited regulation over a country’s economic system. Hoover saw the presidency as a vehicle for improving the conditions of all Americans by encouraging public-private cooperation—what he termed “volunteerism”. Hoover saw volunteerism as preferable to governmental coercion or intervention which he saw as opposed to the American ideals of individualism and self-reliance.
Yeah. How’d that work out?
Yeah. How’d that work out?
It didn’t. It also contributed to Hoover’s 1932 election defeat.
You are using an example from 80 YEARS AGO?
I can give you dozens of examples of public union goons acting badly in the last MONTH.
Face it - if you were to cut military pensions by 50% tomorrow - there would no violence or demonstrations. There would be no threats. They would still do their jobs.
For public union goons - they think it is their right to every dime of taxpayer money and will use all means necessary to keep hold of it. Including violence, intimidation, sabotage, strikes and putting the public in danger.
“You are using an example from 80 YEARS AGO?”
Yes, I like to delve into the distant past.
Face it - if you were to cut military pensions by 50% tomorrow - there would no violence or demonstrations. There would be no threats. They would still do their jobs.
So if a group of veterans and active duty service members were to peacefully protest pension cuts in front fo the Capitol or the White House, you would consider that to be a form of goonery?
Face it - if you were to cut military pensions by 50% tomorrow - there would no violence or demonstrations. There would be no threats. They would still do their jobs.
You sure have a high opinion of our armed forces. I’m sure they’re well trained in the art of killing, and will obey orders from higher ups even if they are morally questionable.
But I also know that they are EXPECTING to get those pensions. And I doubt they will be too happy if they get stiffed.
FWIW, history is rife with Military Coups. They aren’t the Saints you make them out to be.
“You are using an example from 80 YEARS AGO?”
It was the last time the FedGov tried to stiff the military retirees. Thise who ignore history are bound to repeat it.
…exactly.
His treatment of the Bonus Army was one of the key non-economic factors that doomed Hoover in the 1932 re-election. As if his handling of the economy wasn’t enough.
“Compare/contrast with public union goons.”
Because military goons are “different”.
You got a bad case of legalism going on there Banana. And where there is legalism, you’ll find hypocrisy. Every. Single. Time.
RAL, what’s your ZIP code? I’ll furnish you with the military recruiter office addresses. Walk a mile…
Walked many miles in the US Army my friend. I did my patriotic duty. You on the other hand….
The Coast Guard wasn’t interested in me when I was 50.
“They will slaute smartly and drive on with their lives.”
I hope you’re right, but I doubt it. I knew way too many military double dippers when I lived in San Diego. And for most the second dip was also a FedGov or state job. Many were quite smug about all their pensions
You got that right.
20 years in the service, the “preferential treatment” when applying for any open government positions. Lots of ex-military guys in the FAA and various law enforcement establishment.
Then, a lot of those 20 year guys go fly/work for the Air Guard, and add time on to the 20.
Biggest house completed in my old nabe in the past 10 years was one built by a retired (at 55) Air Guard Brigadier General. He flew tankers, so he never came withing 500 miles of a SAM launch.
JMO, but I think military retiree benefits should work off a “points” scale. IOW, a guy spending 20 years in the jungle eating snakes should get a better retirement package than a guy who spent 20 years stocking shelves at the BX in San Antonio.
Usually, it is that way. 90% of the time. But just like anywhere else, you have those remaining few who know how to work the system.
A new life as a Goonery Sergeant?
The choice should be simple, you either slash the defense budget by cutting these insane pet projects or you slash retiree benefits. If you saw what I have witnessed when attending these self serving defense contract shows in DC and Ft Lauderdale every year, you would get ill. I am so glad to be out of the business I was in as I was disgsuted at seeing defense contractor parasites milling around these shows and stroking every military influencer thery could get their slimy tentacles on. The money thrown about to keep selling these overinflated systems is sucking the lifeblodd out of our economy. Dwight Eisenhower was right about the MIC and what it could ultimately do to the country. If you ever want to see the largest gathering of slimy, whore parasites, go to the AUSA show in DC in October. You will need a Silkwood shower just to get the slime and stench off of your body. America at it’s worst!! I wish 60 min would infitrate this show and show America where their money is being squandered. Slash defense now and watch the country heal faster than you could ever imagine.
Defense contractors- the biggest welfare queens of all. (And they all have smart phones, cable, and air conditioning;-)
Oh so true.
“Defense contractors- the biggest welfare queens of all. (And they all have smart phones, cable, and air conditioning;-)”
No schnit. I know one dude that has a Lambroghini, in fact he has TWO - his gift to the world? A guidance system for missiles that don’t exist.
+1 Alpha…
Ditto that.
Exactly right, alpha.
One snippet from Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 911 showed this in spades. A guy at a podium encouraged defense/security folks to cash in on 9/11 by jacking up prices on any stupid little thing: “whatever you ask for, they will pay it.”
They hate government, but oh will they ever take government money.
How else should they take out their displeasure on gov’t but to capitalize on it?
For one example of something that could make one dislike govt, I believe most folks were against TARP. Many even told their representatives, but were powerless to stop it.
“Oh well, more cheese, pleez!”
Chinese Solar Company employees riot over toxic pollution at factory.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/asia/257302/china-shuts-factory-after-pollution-protests
“The protesters broke into the factory in Zhejiang province, ransacking offices and overturning vehicles before being forced back by police in a three-day protest that began on Thursday, according to state media reports. (We will) go all out to maintain stability and seriously deal with those who are suspected of violating laws in the incident in accordance with the law.”
Now that this is in the press I would not be surprised to see some company executives executed to placate the mob.
This is some hard evidence that China has had an economic policy to undercut our manufacturing base. China solar products should have a heavy tariff levied against them until this stops.
What? Green products use deadly chemicals? I thought they use seaweed fibers and unicorn horn dust to make those things.
No the point was the complete disregard for the environment to give competitive advantage to the Chinese market share. Read the article and it says fluoride was the chemical in question. The same stuff in our water too and I filter it out of my drinking water with a reverse osmosis filter.
Hydroflouric acid may be one of the culprits. It’s used extensively in chip manufacturing.
Very harmful stuff.
Damn Chinese Goons and Thugs………
Hydroflouric acid eat your bones away
I hear they spend most of the day at Jazz the big foundary in Newport beach cashing down HF spills
True ? I don’t know I heard it from a young guy who used to work there
“True ?”
Very true.
LMFAO!
As a former organic farmer, “green” farming involves a little o’ the blue.
I mean that spraying copper sulphate on mildew-prone celery is common, almost necessary practice, to arrive at a product that had no powdery mildew. Nevermind the celery would turn blue! Especially used by the suppliers of large amounts of mono-culture organic.(Like the guys who sell to Whole Foods).
Plus organic farmers can not use commercial fertilizer; they use unprocessed poo for the most part (steer manure, sea bird guano, bat, chicken manure). It’s natural so hey it must be good for you, right? In terms of our farm; chicken manure was delivered; I know things got extremely pungent downwind when the shit hit the fan.
But dont panic; it’s organic!
But dont panic; it’s organic!
I mix soap with nicotine = nicotine sulfate good stuff kills everthing esp root mealy bugs but so does merit by bayer
‘Imidacloprid is the active ingredient in several widely used insecticides. Merit Insecticide ™ is used extensively in commercial plant nurseries as well as in lawn and landscape insect control. Bayer Advanced ™ branded insecticides are intended for the homeowner market and Premise ™ insecticide is use for termites and other structural pest control.
Imidacloprid is also the active ingredient in Advantage Flea Control and many agricultural insecticides. The chemical structure of imidacloprid (right) is a synthetic analog of nicotine, the natural alkaloid found in the leaves of tobacco and related plants.”
organo phosphates sold at HD don’t hardly work they are so over used at nurseries the bugs are immune.
see all the cool triva you can learn being a cactus farmer
The Chinese subsidize solar products to sell to the US and the US subsidizes installation. We were doing the same thing aimed at the European market, which was subsidized on their end as well.
Government subsidy generating malinvestment everywhere. Can’t we just keep our wasteful subsidies at home?
I don’t like subsidies. I am not getting any direct help in buying my system. There is a tax credit but it is my option to take it. My personal investment in solar energy explicitly excluded Asian products. 28% of the total cost goes to my local contractor using all american labor. Yes I buy american made products and I am happy to do it because more money stays here. I also own a Ford for the same reason.
My hat is off to you!
It is difficult when there is no white sticker on the bottom giving the origin.
We try to buy American; it is getting harder and harder.
Some things are worth fight’in for, keep at it!
Their entire country is becoming a toxic cesspool.
maybe thats the plan
they wont live past 60 so no old age problems like “were do we put grandma ….. she has no idea what a toilet is.
Not a problem.
Xian6pack will just have to deal, while their versions of the “Masters of the Universe” will get a free ticket/buy in to Uncle Sugar Land, where they will have a completely new group of peasants to kick around.
Trolls must be sleeping late today, as they seem to be missing in action.
It’s funny how I find them highly annoying when they post here, yet miss their company when they are absent. I even occasionally yearn to hear from Eddie — I could use some reassurances just about now about how the stock market is about to take off to the upside.
Today we will just have to bask in the warm glow of your benign and generous presence.
Any time. Or if you prefer, use the Joshua Tree Extension to avoid my posts.
No need to do that. Couldn’t let you suffer a day without some riding.
They were all sucked unde by Barak Hussein Obama’s recession, and lost their internet.
Hope that helps. My troll fu is weak today.
Did you get the memo? The republicans have declared Class Warfare. All the troops are down at the gun shop stocking up so they can defend the top 2% of the… Job Creators.
Yes they did. Declared war in 1981. And they’ve won.
Yep!
Only the unemployed ones.
DNC Troll Alert.
-Sigh-
dnc troll alert
sigh
Some of us “Trolls” have to keep the economic engine turning so you self proclaimed blog arbiters can post your progressive propaganda unfettered.
Fortunately I did make it to the blog before closing time:)
How many goons do we have here on the blog? I’m not a goon. Most of the guys on my site are goons though. Do you work with goons? Is your spouse a goon? How about your kids? Are they goons? Or maybe goony-goo-goo’s?
I count a lot of Hares.
But then; hare today, goon tomorrow.
I used to be a union goon in the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. Me and my fellow goons built the most powerful military in history. My neighbor is a welder goon and a member of the pipe fitters union. Goons Unite!
PS: All my fellow workers had high security clearances and there was never a case of a union worker selling secrets to the enemy EVER. All the leaks came from high level management or sub contractors. It’s a fact Jack!
First I was an IAM goon, then I became management.
For the most part, the “goons” were more honest.
One of our offspring is a goon, err public school teacher. But very much a goon mentality. Guess it’s just payback; I disappointed my partisan parents too.
I’m the offspring of a goon. She’s a retired public school teacher. And she’s still a union member. So there.
Goon Child!
Yup, that’s me — the Goon Child!
lmao AZ.
Goonies never say die!
“Or maybe goony-goo-goo’s?”
“Your kids, they’re 1/4 Bigfeet!”
Or maybe a few retired Goonery Sergeants….
I’m a former goon (public school teacher), my dad was a goon (though he fought against the union…still kept all the benies won by the union thugs, though), and my DH is a goon.
Goons unite!
Home builders’ sentiment seems permanently stuck in the basement. It’s not the change (”dips slightly”) that matters here, but the permanently-moribund level.
Sept. 19, 2011, 10:00 a.m. EDT
Home builders index dips slightly in September
By Steve Goldstein
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes dipped slightly in September to remain in very low territory, according to an index released Monday. The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index fell by a point to 14, on a seasonally adjusted index where readings above 50 are considered good. The index, which correlates closely with single-family housing starts, has held between 13 and 16 for the last six months. Economists polled by MarketWatch had expected a 15 reading.
Interesting aside. Yesterday my wife wanted to replace a broken mini blind (58″ X 47″: white). Went to J.C. Penny’s as they had a sale going at 70% off. Standard item that we all bought in the 90’s, 2000’s for $20. The price was $190 but with 70% reduction only a mere $58. When did such inflation on cheap, crappy window products arise? I then went to Homedepot where they were still high at $38! I think I’ll watch garage sales.
The other thing we noticed was that Sear’s, J.C. Penny’s and other similar stores seemed to be getting rid of their section on bedding. Soon the mortar and brick stores will be e-online stores the modern version of J.C. Penny, Sears, and Montgomery Wards catalog store of yore.
Does your area have a Fallas Paredes?
Big Lots?
Wal-Mart?
What the heck, it’s Chinese anyway.
I thought importing crap from China was going to lower prices. It didn’t work out that way after all, huh?
That “savings” never made it to the shelves.
Made in USA widget cost $10 wholesale, sold for $20.
Management goons found out they could buy an inferior widget from China for $2, price it at $17, grab market share on “price”, while increasing their profits 50%.
This works for a while. Until all your management goon competitiors move to China, and all your customers lose their jobs and can’t afford the $17 widget. Or the $10 widget. Or the $8 widget.
There it is, in a nutshell.
Well said, X-GS!
Soon the mortar and brick stores will be e-online stores ??
Which will fatally torpedo 50% of the standing commercial real estate across this country…Might as well tear it down…
So why is the USPS dying??
MegaWalTartMegaIkeaMegaHomeDespotMegaCostcoMegaLowes
Re-arrange the letters to spell:
Megawalkingworkoutacrossparkinglottointerioraislejogathon
You crack me up Hwy…
Inflaiton went through the roof right around 2001 and got even worse over the last 4 years.
When people tell me they haven’t personally seen it, that tells me they either don’t get out enough or are about to expereince it.
Correct.
Went to the grocery store yesterday and paid almost $200 for a cart that was maybe 3/4 filled. No inflation????
Ron:
Duh no wonder why Fresh direct and the Unemployment office here will pay for truck driver training and almost nothing else…..and will subside your first few months of working….
they want truck drivers….and lots of them
…which is strange as MOST truck drivers BARELY make a living these days.
most truck drivers have no idea how to drive in a big city either..
The number of drivers daily that have no idea how to swing an 18 wheeler around a curb with parked cars at a meter
lots of back up traffic.
What do I like about Dr. Doom? The guy understands how to skip to the chase.
Sept. 19, 2011, 7:12 a.m. EDT
Greece should default, exit euro, Roubini says
By William L. Watts
FRANKFURT (MarketWatch) — Greece should begin an “orderly” default and voluntarily leave the euro in order to escape a “vicious cycle of insolvency, low competitiveness and ever-deepening depression,” economist Nouriel Roubini said in a guest column published Monday in the Financial Times. Other options, such as a sharp weakening of the euro, a rapid reduction in Greece’s unit labor costs or a rapid deflation in prices and wages appear unlikely or impractical, said Roubini, a New York University professor and chairman of Roubini Global Economics. While the process would be traumatic, a return to the drachma and a sharp depreciation in its value “would quickly restore competitiveness and growth, as it did in Argentina and many other emerging markets which abandoned their currency pegs,” he said.
I have an alternative idea. Let’s go back 2000 years and make Italy and Greece reunite. The new country could be called Christiana or Christland or some such. The debt would become the responsibility of the Catholic church and they could recover the costs by selling indulgences for past sins. They can have their own Tea Party by resurrecting the Spartans!
“The debt would become the responsibility of the Catholic church and they could recover the costs by selling indulgences for past sins.”
Wouldn’t work. Italy has the Roman Catholic Chuch and Greece is Greek Orthodox. Each has their own “management”, so to speak. I’m not sure Greek Orthodox even sells indulgences.
But thanks for playing!
IIRC, the sale of indulgences was banned by the Council of Trent.
Shucks, add or subtract a few paragraphs in their holy books and they are all selling the same snake oil.
Actually the RCC and Orthodox “Holy Books” are the same ones.
Nobody put guns to the heads of the bankers who made subprime loans to Greece — did they?
Transcript: Emergency Global Forum: Will This Debt Crisis Be Worse Than 2008? (Edited, as needed, for clarity)
Martin D. Weiss Ph.D. | Monday, September 19, 2011 at 7:30 am
Martin Weiss: We stand on the threshold of one of the most dramatic financial disasters of our lifetime: The default of the oldest democracy in the history of Western civilization — Greece — is threatening the largest economies in the history of civilization — the European Union and the United States.
I’m Martin Weiss, and this is the Weiss Research Emergency Global Forum. We’re here today to tell you what the consequences will be and what to do about it.
…
No, they didn’t. Funny how they are now “victims.”
If I’m not mistaken, Goldman was heavily involved. Hence, no surprise Timmy is over there wagging his finger at Europe. Greece don’t pay, Goldman don’t get, Fed don’t get from Goldman. Simplistic, but I think that’s the gist of it.
I dunno why they don’t tell him to stuff it.
I dunno why they don’t tell him to stuff it.
I think they did. They just did it so politely that some people missed it.
They became a democracy in 1973. They are no where near being the oldest living democracy.
The basic ideas of democracy did form in those cities about the year 400 BC. but it was never a continous democracy. The basic idea is that people vote and all men serve in the military as volunteers.
N
Their foray into capitalistic banking practices is bound to end badly for Red China.
Sept. 18, 2011, 8:42 p.m. EDT
More warnings on China’s debt
Commentary: Shadow banking sparks new worries
By Craig Stephen
HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — Three years ago, China’s banks were widely applauded as they lent their way out of the last financial crisis, hauling much of the world with them. But now with these loans coming due and interest rates on the rise, officials and analysts are increasingly sounding the alarm.
Throw into the mix new revelations about the escalation of shadow banking, and it’s little surprise “China” and “subprime” are increasingly talked about in the same breath.
So far, the loans causing most unease are with local-government investment vehicles, estimated at up to $1.7 trillion. Cheng Siwei, a former vice-chairman of the standing committee of the National People’s Congress told the World Economic Forum last week in Dalian:
But this is by no means the only lending worry on the horizon.
…
ABREAST OF THE MARKET
SEPTEMBER 19, 2011
Wall Street’s Optimism Fades
By JONATHAN CHENG
After a summer of denial, reality has caught up with Wall Street strategists.
Having spent much of the year making ever-higher predictions for the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, and sticking to them through August’s turmoil, many strategists are now cutting their forecasts.
It is about time, some investors say—and a sign that expectations may now be better calibrated to the realities of a global market crippled by a European debt crisis and sluggish U.S. growth prospects.
David Bianco, a high-profile strategist left Merrill Lynch last week, just days after reaffirming his year-end target of 1400 for the S&P 500 and raising his 12-month forecast.
“At the beginning of the year, everyone was tripping over themselves to raise their S&P 500 targets, and now it’s the opposite,” said Scott Migliori, U.S. chief investment officer for money manager RCM, a subsidiary of Allianz Global Investors.
Goldman Sachs last Wednesday ratcheted down its end-of-year prediction for the S&P 500 to 1250, from its previous forecast of 1400. Last Monday, Wells Fargo dropped its forecast to 1250 from 1390. And on Friday, Citigroup lowered its target to 1325 from 1400.
The S&P 500 ended last week at 1216.01, which leaves most of the predictions still looking relatively bullish. Strategists on average expect the S&P 500 to end the year at 1309, according to Birinyi Associates—a rise of 7.6% from Friday’s close through year end.
At the beginning of 2011, strategists were looking for an 8.5% gain for the entire year, predicting a year-end close of 1365.
…
It is about time, some investors say—and a sign that expectations may now be better calibrated to the realities of a global market crippled by a European debt crisis and sluggish U.S. growth prospects.
But I thought that those billions of impoverished workers in the 3rd world were going to pick up the slack and buy stuff. What happened?
Imported turd world populations in this area have other ideas. Why buy when you can steal?
Week Ahead: Fed Expected to Launch New Program While Europe Debt Troubles Bubble
By: Patti Domm CNBC Executive News Editor
The Fed in the week ahead is widely expected to pull the trigger on a new easing program, as the European debt crisis continues to boil.
The housing market will also be a focus when new and existing home sales data is released Tuesday and Wednesday. New data this past week showed a jump in foreclosure starts, signaling that a big wave of foreclosed properties will hit the struggling housing market early next year.
The Dow and S&P 500 had their best week since July and second best week since July 2010, as European officials showed support for Greece. The Nasdaq did even better — jumping 6.3 percent, for its best week since July, 2009.
Market expectations are high that the Fed will announce a new program — dubbed “operation twist” — at the end of its two-day meeting Wednesday.
“Twist” is different than the much larger scale “QE2″ quantitative easing program which involved the purchase of $600 billion in Treasury securities. Fed watchers expect this program to raise the duration of the securities the Fed holds, not the amount. The program, in theory, could reduce long-term interest rates as the Fed buys more securities in the middle and longer end of the yield curve.
“It’s not their job to bail out the whole world, but next week there’s high expectations for the Fed,” said Nomura Americas Treasury strategist George Goncalves. The Fed this past week joined with the European Central Bank and others to provide more dollar liquidity for euro zone financial institutions.
European finance ministers ended their meeting in Poland with no signs of progress in handling the sovereign debt crisis. Some traders were looking for the officials to provide some clarity on the purchases of sovereign debt, which so far has fallen to the ECB. The euro zone countries are in the process of voting on enhancing the powers of the European Financial Stabilization Facility bailout fund, or EFSF.
In the coming week, the IMF meets in Washington and Europe will certainly be on the agenda. Ahead of that meeting, representatives of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are expected to meet to discuss whether they can help the European situation.
Meanwhile, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou canceled his trip to the U.S. He said in a statement that the coming week is “particularly critical for the implementation of the July 21 decisions in the euro area and the initiatives which the country must undertake.”
Inspectors from the IMF, EU and ECB will be working with Greek officials this week as they struggle to get approval for their next 8 billion euro funding tranche, without which Greece would default.
“The Fed…to provide more dollar liquidity for euro zone financial institutions…..no signs of progress in handling the sovereign debt crisis…..”
I seem to have read over and over that providing liquidity (loans) will not solve a debt crisis. I think I can grasp that simple concept.
I wonder if the Fed pays European financial institutions to take the loans, like they do in the US.
Has anyone thought about the pros and cons of taking out a 3.5% FHA loan, and just doing a strategic default if you need to sell?
The government is pushing this angle by creating the conditions which encourage it. It helps the banks and that is the goal of the government. The government is intent on dragging on the housing market price correction as long as possible, Japan-style.
I guess my question is - what is the blowback here, the consequences? I have some thoughts:
1) If you’re in a recourse state, they can garnish your wages or otherwise come you - true? If so, what can they do?
2) It will hurt job prospects because of the damage to credit rating - but what exactly would be the damage? If I have an 800 FICO and do a strategic default, what exactly will my credit rating be after this.
3) Security clearances - would a strategic default affect the chances of getting one?
4) Future home buying would be harder - true? For how long?
5) Future renting would be harder - true? For how long?
Other thoughts?
I’ve been renting for a while, and if the full force of the US government is to support the NAR (one of the largest political contributors) and the banks - is it time for “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em”?
Well, after 2012 the difficiency amount will be taxable.
3) Security clearances - yes it hurts if the clearance is DoD issued. It demonstrates a lack of responsibility on one hand and it maybe evidence the employee is a bit weak in basic reasoning skills for getting in such debt to begin with. If you had a security clearance before you might offset this mark on your record.
If you are married you can claim temporary lapse of facilities.
“DoD”
Yeah, and we all should be careful if this whole thing goes sideways… they may be the last employer standing.
“pros and cons of taking out a 3.5% FHA loan, and just doing a strategic default if you need to sell?”
What are the ‘pros’ of doing this?
No rent increases.
No housing costs!
If you can’t beat them, join them… I think a lot of bubble-sitters have considered this. If the Fed/govt is so intent on forcing us into bad decisions, we might as well do what they’re rewarding us to do. Lord knows that being a responsible renter hasn’t worked so far.
First day back online after a trip to NW Montana to visit the spectacular Glacier National Park. We spent a day in Whitefish and Kalispell, which allowed me to play my favorite “Could I live here?” game.
The area appears fairly prosperous. Neat and tidy, very few empty storefronts. Tourism is big business both summer (golf, water sports, fishing, the national park nearby) and winter (skiing, fishing), along with ranching. I don’t know what else keeps the economy going there–oil & gas? Mining? Logging?. Home prices aren’t as low as I might have thought (far off the beaten path for a city dweller!) Particularly on the area’s lakes– Flathead and Whitefish–prices seemed astronomical. Saw one ad for a Flathead Lake waterfront home with a boat slip, asking price $399,500. That appeared reasonable until I saw another ad for the same property that specified it’s a CONDO. The few homes for sale on Whitefish Lake, which is on the edge of the cutesy-hip town of Whitefish, are in a similarly exorbitant seven-figure range as what you’d find in Chicago’s north suburbs on Lake Michigan.
As elsewhere, it’s all about supply and demand, with a dose of wishful seller pricing thrown in.
Flathead and Whitefish = Montana’s “Blingville”
Hwy, do you mean there are celebrities who have homes there, like in Idaho and Wyoming? Or un-famous wealthy people? Or both? And how does an area get chosen to become a Blingville, anyway? Of course, this one has lakes, rivers, mountains and one of the most beautiful national parks nearby. So I guess it isn’t surprising. But I was surprised anyway.
Eyes mean all the above. Ultraouttastate Wealthie$ + Quasi-Wannabees lookatmyreallyhuge$helter + BuymyArtpiecestoday.
Montana is as close as the lower 48 America gets to BC Canada. (Hard to imagine the good folks of “Big Sky” country elected an Anti-American Democratic Governor who is a Gov’t fi$cal illusionist, unlike Preacher Perry in Texa$)
Elanor,
My property backs up to the Rockies south of Glacier Park. It’s one of the most beautiful places on the planet.
There is a relatively large group of people that have homes in the general area who can live anywhere they choose. Most don’t stay year round. Flathead lake is home to Maury Povich/Connie Chung, Phil Jackson (NBA coach), etc.
Whitefish lake has at least one of the Google boys who has a 20 million $ home there.
Most of the native Montanan’s live a relatively humble life. Really good people overall.
Choteau?
West of the divide.
—— Obama to call for broad tax increases
Wants three dollars in taxes for each dollar of new cuts”
By Stephen Dinan
-
President Obama on Monday will propose a deficit plan that calls for about three dollars in new tax increases for every dollar in additional spending cuts as he seeks to put his imprint on the ongoing talks over reducing the government’s staggering debt burden————–
Hmmm…. This will end well.
—Those HELOC for side business and rainy day use will getcha everytime—
Athena Kaiman at her Miami-area home. Falling prices are giving her pause about moving to Nashville, Tenn.
We continue our series today profiling buyers and sellers navigating the housing market. See past profiles.
Athena Kaiman is ready to leave the sun and sand of Miami for the country-music culture of Nashville, Tenn. Aside from her favorite musicians, Nashville offers affordable homes, low property taxes and proximity to an important business client.
But Ms. Kaiman, like so many other Americans ready to buy a home, is stuck. The problem isn’t just that banks are demanding a steep down payment. (She and her husband, who own a small book publishing-related company, have saved up enough money for that.) Falling prices are holding them back.
“We’re sitting on the fence, because however much money you have left over, the prices are sinking further and further, and you can’t see the bottom. It’s terrifying,” she says. “I would like to leave, but I am trapped here. I’m kind of heartsick about it.”
Ms. Kaiman lives with her husband and daughter, who is in law school, in a home she bought for $750,000 in 2006 on North Bay Island, which sits in Biscayne Bay between Miami and Miami Beach. She and her husband took out a home-equity loan as a rainy-day fund for their business, and are still saddled with $375,000 in house-related debt, Ms. Kaiman says. Meanwhile, home prices in Miami have fallen by more than half, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city composite index, to levels not seen since 2003.
When the economy worsened in 2008, Ms. Kaiman says, her bank ended her line of credit, without explaining why, a potential threat to her business. Even though she has a credit score in the 800s, Ms. Kaiman says lenders in Nashville are asking for down payments as high as 50%. Credit standards have tightened, and the couple are considered self-employed since they own their own company.
“I’m self-employed, but I might as well just say I’m unemployed when it comes to a bank,” Ms. Kaiman says.
Still, Ms. Kaiman could be tipped over the edge, she says, with the right incentive. She and her husband missed out on the first-time homebuyer tax credit, but if a lender offered loan incentives, she would consider taking the plunge. That would mean reducing fees and shaving points off of her mortgage, or a lower down payment — incentives that are sometimes offered by new home builders and their in-house mortgage units.
But barring those or another incentive, Ms. Kaiman says she’ll continue to wait until she feels better about the economy, or at least Miami’s housing market, to try and sell her North Bay Island home.
“I could probably do it if I were willing to put myself through it but … I would have to be willing to give up a good chunk of my life savings,” Ms. Kaiman says. “You don’t sleep. You’re in a constant state of agitation. You feel trapped … Where am I supposed to live?”
This one reeks.
At those price levels, $8K tax credit is an incentive only if you’re stupid.
If she bought a house for $750K, and houses have fallen to half, and she owes $375K, then she should be able to sell her home and break even exactly give or take fees.
If housing is so affordable in Nashville, then she should have no trouble putting $50K down on a $100K house. (oh wait, she probably doesn’t want a $100K house.)
If ending her HELOC is a threat to her business, then her business probably isn’t doing well enough for her to have a 800 FICO.
Just wait until someone has to pay back law school student loans…
Whine, whine, b*tch, b*tch! How about suck it up and stay in Miami?
North Bay Island is very nice. They should be able to sell the house tomorrow if the price was right. I would bet they want to recover their $750k investment so they will hold on until they can get it back, or are insolvent, whichever comes first.
I liked this response to the Florida Lady who cannot move away—
——This lady is nuts. I bought my Florida home in 2003 (mid-boom) and it is worth 20% less than I paid (it’s almost paid off though because it was within my means, not some exotic gamble dependent upon wishful thinking that homes will increase in value regardless of circumstances, in spite of the government’s best efforts to make it so. Sometimes sacrifices need to be made- I took an out of state job in 2006 and lived in an apartment 1/3 the size of my home for three years. Lifestyle took a hit, but I own my obligations. I tried to sell but the market had literally frozen at the time so I converted it to a rental property that almost was just a little cash negative. (three months earlier I could have stood in my driveway with a sign and sold the place). Of course, I drive a paid for Honda- boring as hell but it beats a $600/month payment on the BMW.
Too many people, including Baby Boomers that drove this train off the rails, (I’m a few years younger) seem to think that they should have no ramifications for poor decisions. The government shouldn’t have bailed out banks, and they shouldn’t bail out consumers, and perhaps this lady should “downsize” (egad!) and reassess her priorities. Remember people- its just stuff. Please spend your idle time at a Food Kitchen or some other environment in which people are truly struggling, not lamenting your inabliity to flip one luxury home for another.
———
Please spend your idle time at a Food Kitchen or some other environment in which people are truly struggling, not lamenting your inablity to flip one luxury home for another.
I like this commenter’s style.
evildocs
I’ll second Az Slim’s admiration for you.
I called a local food bank couple of years ago if they needed any volunteers for the holiday season. The answer was if I belonged to a group, church or otherwise they would have me, but not as an individual. They also made a point that they were more than happy to accept my “individual” monetary contribution. Never felt so disgusted about “charity” organizations in my life……
Well, butters, you’ll love the story that’s breaking in our local fishwrap. Call it the clash of the mental health agencies. And, if you really need to raise your heart rate, check out this guy’s salary.
Kick his a$$, Sea Bass!
There is a major problem with the entitlement mentality in this country. We each can do according to our own skills and ability. Too many people want to live on other’s skills and ability, and seeing get-rich-quick schemes such as real estate, stock trading, and other activities with marginal economic value, they have finally started realizing that the good old days of living on 120% of 100% of one’s income aren’t coming back.
From the “SPIN AND WHAT ARE THEY SMOKIN’” File
———-
Of the many financial reforms in Dodd-Frank, a requirement that lenders retain a share of the risk in mortgages they sell to investors seemed like a no-brainer. If lenders were on the hook, too, the thinking went, they would tighten standards and avoid the kind of defaults that contributed to the collapse of the housing marketand the financial crisis.
But now that a rule to implement this provision has been written, critics say the requirement will make it so hard to get a mortgage that it will further depress the housing market and undercut a struggling economy. “I’ve been in this business 32 years and I have never seen guidelines as tight as they are now,” said Scott Eggen, senior vice president for capital markets with PrimeLending, a mortgage lending subsidiary of Dallas-based Plains Capital Corp.
The proposal as introduced will literally erase a decade of accomplishment in defining what is a responsible loan,” said David Berenbaum, chief program officer with the Coalition, an advocacy group for community organizations that support affordable housing and equal access to credit. “It is going to narrow the range of loans that lenders are willing to originate to the point that only consumers with the best credit scores—meaning white and affluent consumers—are going to get loans.”
Regulators defined qualifying residential mortgages very conservatively, requiring a 20 percent down payment, caps on a borrower’s debt-to-income ratio, restrictions on loan terms, and other limits designed to restrict the number of loans that would qualify for the exemption.
Why is it that none of these braintrusts ever seem to consider no one but the rich being able to afford more homes than they could ever want to own will actually result in lower home prices and that their constituents would end up better in the end?
Yeah, I know, it actually isn’t about the constituents at all.
The proposal as introduced will literally erase a decade of accomplishment in defining what is a responsible loan,” said David Berenbaum…
————–
That’s funny. Is he trying to imply that the past 10 years have been a “decade of accomplishment in defining what a responsible loan” is? That’s truly side-splitting!
What an idiot!
Shakin out da mess:
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Banks have stepped up their actions against homeowners who have fallen behind on their mortgage payments, setting the stage for a fresh wave of foreclosures.
The number of U.S. homes that received an initial default notice — the first step in the foreclosure process — jumped 33 percent in August from July, foreclosure listing firm RealtyTrac Inc. said Thursday.
The increase represents a nine-month high and the biggest monthly gain in four years. The spike signals banks are starting to take swifter action against homeowners, nearly a year after processing issues led to a sharp slowdown in foreclosures.
“This is really the first time we’ve seen a significant increase in the number of new foreclosure actions,” said Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac. “It’s still possible this is a blip, but I think it’s much more likely we’re seeing the beginning of a trend here.”
Obama Proposes New Czars
9/19/2011 | Lurita Doan | Townhall.com
As the Obama agenda proves increasingly impotent, Americans have witnessed Obama’s czars crash and burn or run for cover over the past thirty months. From Van Jones to Kevin Jennings to Nancy-Ann DeParle to Todd Stern to Ron Bloom, Obama’s style of management–bypassing the senate-confirmed agency heads–has failed to yield the results promised to the American people. You would think Obama would give up on the failed idea of using a curious collection of White House czars to manage complex economic and regulatory issues. No way.
Instead, in the American Jobs Act, Obama is proposing a new group of czars as a part of his “jobs” act– the American Infrastructure Financing Authority (AIFA) czars. President Obama’s newest czars will be given the authority to manage over a trillion dollars of federal funding for roads, bridges, buildings, waterways, dams and other infrastructure.
Here we go again. No doubt, Obama hopes that few legislators or American citizens will read the deadly details buried within the 199 pages of his proposed American Jobs Act that will establish this latest czar-ship, nor understand just how expensive AIFA is going to be.
As with Obama’s other czars, the AIFA czar comes with infrastructure requirements of his own: staff, office space and technology needed to perform the job. Managing what is in reality a trillion dollar budget is going to require a huge new staff that will, essentially represent an entire new federal agency. Of course, nowhere does President Obama tell us why a new czar is required to manage infrastructure projects. More importantly, Obama does not explain why the vast federal bureaucracy now responsible for these activities must be bypassed and a new, redundant agency is built.
Make no mistake: the AIFA Czar position is redundant. All of the infrastructure projects and tasks identified to be performed by Obama’s new Czar are already the responsibilities of the Senate-confirmed heads of Department of Transportation, the U.S. General Services Administration and the Department of Energy.
How about a Czar Czar?
Was that Zsa Zsa’s first husband?
Zsa Zsa’s Czar Czar? Sure!
Obama doesn’t have Czars. He has Goons and Thugs.
Czar-Czar Binks.
Nice.
You won’t hear ANYONE in congress raise a fuss. The more the imperial presidency governs (this is regardless of which party holds the White House) the less congress has to govern, which allows congresscritters to devote their full time and attention to Job Number One: going out and raising money for their re-election campaigns.
BTW, you still think Hillary won’t be our next president? Maybe you didn’t read this.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-chapman-obama-reelection,0,622512.column
They even trotted Bill out on CNBC today. Next step will be the announcement of a Draft Hillary movement. Remember, you heard it here first.
Weren’t falling house prices supposed to lessen the property tax liability? What ever happend to the ’silver lining’?
(Crain’s Chicago Business) — If it seems like property taxes on your house have been rising while its value has been dropping, they have.
A new report being issued on Monday by the Civic Federation says that the “effective property-tax rate” on residential property — the percentage of a home’s real value that must be paid in taxes — rose in every corner of the metropolitan area in 2009, the latest for which data is available.
In Cook County, for instance, the effective property-tax rate on residential property rose 8.3% in Oak Park and 10.7% in Chicago between ‘08 and ‘09. Bad as that sounds, the numbers were far worse in the other 11 towns surveyed by the Civic Federation, ranging from 11.1% higher in Arlington Heights to 12.1% in Evanston, 17.1% in Glenview, 27.8% in Schaumburg and 28.5% in Chicago Heights.
The money has been spent
There are no give backs in public union contracts
You will pay no matter what your house is worth
Or another union goon will come (with a gun) and take it from you
Damn goons……
“There are no give backs in public union contracts”
Just watched this happen in Palm Beach County. Not saying anything good or bad about public unions or anyone or anything else, but when you give something to someone (even if it is based on pure fantasy property values and propery taxes) it is really hard to take it away. Even after the fantasy tax values have collapsed.
Our assessed value dropped but only by a single-digit percentage (we bought a foreclosure at well under then-current market back in 2005). Based on the county website’s worksheet we expect our property tax to drop by about the same percentage.
Huh? Why did this show up down here?
Destiny is Demography
Bill Bonner
The San Francisco Federal Reserve bank came out with a gloomy forecast last month. Its analysts said that stocks were likely to earn paltry returns over the next 10 years. The reason cited was simple enough; stockholders don’t live forever.
‘Demography is destiny,’ said Auguste Comte. ‘It works the other way around too,’ he might have added. If they thought they were going to live longer, America’s most ubiquitous age cohort — the baby boomers — might continue to buy stocks. Instead, the cold hand of the grave is on their shoulders and on the whole economy. The boomers are retiring at the rate of 10,000 per day over the next 18 years. They will sell stocks to finance their remaining years.
Old people have always been a drag on an economy. Migrating tribes left them behind. Eskimos put them out on the ice. Old people generally bowed to their fate with good grace. In times of famine, for example, they stopped eating so the young might live.
Mortality has doomed the stock market, says the S.F. Fed. P/E ratios will likely be cut in half. Investors are unlikely to see their stocks return to 2010 levels, says the report, until 2027. And this assumes that US companies will continue to grow profits as they did since 1954. Not very likely. Because democracy, energy, and financial quackery are destiny too. Jointly and severally, they are responsible for the biggest financial debacle in history.
This week, Deutsche Bank came out with a report of its own. It, too, is confident that the “Golden Age” — 1982-2007 — is over. In its place is a “Grey Age.” Instead of the nominal 12.8% gains of the Golden Age, investors have gotten returns of — 2.8% per annum for the last 4 years. Deutsche Bank expects stock market investors to lose about 10% of their money — in real terms — over the next 10 years, while the economy goes through 3 recessions!
But what would you expect? Everything droops. For the last 3 or 4 centuries the winning formula for developed economies and their governments has been simple: More energy. More output. More people. More credit. More promises. This formula has been so effective for so long people began to think it was destiny itself. It’s not. Instead, it is slave to destiny not its master.
By 2007, the slave was put in his place. The business cycle turned sour. Native populations in Europe and Japan are falling. Energy use per person in the developed world has leveled off. Private sector credit is shrinking. So is real private sector output.
The feds responded to this challenge as they had to every post-WWII slowdown. They added more — more money, more credit. The government itself spent more money and used more energy. But the economy did not react in the old manner.
An obvious reason: people are no longer as young and sans-soucis as they used to be. A young man’s eye may be drawn to fast German cars or slick Italian suits. But an old man can barely see at all. The baby boomers no longer roll their joints; they rub them. And they are no longer the source of an economic boom; now, they are the proximate cause of the bust.
But there’s more to this new Grey Age than demography. People too are subject to the law of declining marginal utility. They wear out. But so do even the most enduring and impressive economic trends. There were only 450 million people on the planet in 1500. It took 99,000 years to reach that level. Then, over the next 5 centuries — the population soared 10 times. Today, it is hard to find a parking place in any major city. How was such a big jump in population possible? Destiny was demography. With ready, cheap energy at hand, man could grow more food. And then he could ship it all around the world. And he could put his talents to work making more and better machines…which would vastly increase his output and his standard of living.
But the Machine Age ages too. The first tractors appeared more than 100 years ago. They may have increased production 10…20…100 times. Since then, improvements have been incremental, not revolutionary. We have bigger, faster, better tractors — that use more energy than ever.
Meanwhile, energy itself came to be more expensive. When the price of energy rose in the ’70s, the “30 glorious years” that followed WWII were soon over. Hourly wage rates stopped increasing and have not gone up since.
Yes, there is plenty of energy around. But it is net output that you get from energy that counts, not the raw output. If a gallon of gasoline costs $5…it must produce more than $5 in additional output or the economy gets poorer. As the price rises fewer and fewer new energy apps pay off.
Likewise, credit is subject to the law of declining marginal utility too. In 1950, an additional dollar of credit added about 70 cents to GDP. By 2007, the US economy was adding more than $5 of debt to produce a single new dollar’s worth of GDP. Now, the feds’ new credit inputs produce negative real returns.
The jig is up. More no longer works.
Regards,
Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning
“Old people generally bowed to their fate with good grace. In times of famine, for example, they stopped eating so the young might live.”
Now it’s mobility scooters…at no cost to you!
Oh, brother. Scooters.
If there’s anyone who’d be justified in using one of those, it would be my mother. Why? Because she was recently in a car accident with my dad.
They were making a left turn at an intersection with a traffic light, and some SUV/van/I’m not quite clear on what the other driver was in broadsided them. Dad’s car was totaled, and mom was hurt.
She says she’s okay now. Meaning that she’s not using a cane anymore.
I didn’t dare bring up the scooter topic. Why not? Because when I see her again, I don’t want her going into the closet and fishing out that cane so she can whack me with it.
In short, don’t get my mom started on scooters. Just don’t.
Sorry to hear about you mom’s accident, Slim. At least she sounds like she is healing fairly well.
I wonder if he factors in the possibility the US dollar’s value will distort those numbers?
The jig is up. More no longer works.
So is he saying that what we call “capitalism” will be swept into the dustbin of history?
We can hope, right?
Just kidding…kind of.
The theoretical type of capitalism — where everyone is good and there is full transparency — is a nice ideal, but reality just doesn’t work that way.
you mean…consumer based economies start to suck when people consume less?
shocking.
“Deutsche Bank… is confident that the “Golden Age” — 1982-2007 — is over.”
Strange coincidence that a former beknighted Federal Reserve chairman’s term closely mirrors that timeframe, and he was last seen in the employment of Deutsche Bank.
Past the researched referenced reports, Bonner is talking out of his… hat.
Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning
yes correct meanwhile we all wait for the new technology to lift us back to growth again.
Historic central Pennsylvania seed company in danger of closing launches online campaign
ANDREW SHAW The York Dispatch
NEW FREEDOM, Pa. — A 227-year-old New Freedom company that at one point supplied seed to George Washington and is one of the oldest continuously operating companies in America is in danger of going out of business.
Now staff members are using a fervent online campaign and plea for help to help support the D. Landreth Seed Co., which needs to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars this fall to remain open.
Landreth started in Philadelphia in 1784 and moved around the region until settling in New Freedom around 2006 after being purchased by Barb Melera and her husband, Peter.
Landreth has long been well-known in the gardening world for its heirloom seeds, Melera said.
That’s not to mention Landreth’s introducing America to zinnias and the white-fleshed potato, among other achievements.
Now the company is in danger of folding because of more than $400,000 in loan payments to investors due immediately.
The money was originally due two years ago, and was caught up in courts until a judge recently ordered a freeze on Landreth’s bank accounts.
Landreth is hoping to raise at least $250,000 by the end of the month through donations and sales, particularly off its full-color 2012 seed catalog.
Without at least that much, the accounts will likely remain frozen, bills won’t get paid and 227 years of history and growth — in all senses of the word — vanish.
Melera said she’s not upset people who had lent Landreth money sought payment.
“These people have every right,” she said.
The money was due in 2009, and Melera’s plan to return the company to profitability was behind schedule because Landreth had several broken pieces of equipment and was way behind on technology.
“Accounting had been done on index cards. They were using a typewriter,” Melera said of how things were done before 2003.
The loan was to help update Landreth “after 75 years of neglect,” Melera said. The company has since become profitable again, she said.
Vendors and customers have both stood by the company’s side, she said with tears in her eyes, offering to make deals to keep Landreth afloat in the short-term.
“It’s been overwhelmingly positive,” she said.
The online campaign through Facebook has helped drum up about $50,000 in catalog orders, and about $800 has been donated.
The Huffington Post, as well as several gardening blogs around the country, asked readers to support Landreth as well.
Now Landreth hopes to get some big donors or investors willing to buy thousands of catalogs to help raise enough money to make up the significant gap.
The $5 catalogs are Landreth’s bread-and-butter, as the company specializes in 800-plus organic, heirloom vegetable, fruit and flower seeds hard to find in chain stores.
“It’s a resource if you want to know the history of the things you eat,” Melera said.
Plus, the catalogs are full of advice, something Landreth officials started including in the mid-1800s to help immigrants.
That’s what Melera said she is hoping to protect, more than just saving a locally owned and operated business.
“This is our legacy. It’s not the Enrons and AIGs. This is as much America today as it was 200 years ago,” she said.
“Accounting had been done on index cards. They were using a typewriter,” Melera said of how things were done before 2003.
Now THAT is old school.
But I can’t help but wonder why the upgrading of their accounting system requires a six-figure expenditure.
I mean, come on. There’s plenty of off-the-shelf accounting software out there. This company’s probably a bit too big to use QuickBooks, but there are packages out there that can handle mail order operations.
Slim wants to see the business plan that went with the pitch to outside investors. Something’s not adding up here.
The 5 figure “consultant?”
Looks like they died two years ago.
They should declare
$600.00Pro-Bono Chapter 11 BK. Use the incoming donation’s as “seed money” for a new-old school family company with $2,000 worth of computers.Lucy: “Hwy you’re such a BLOCKHEAD!“
Tragic, but not surprising.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2016250767_apusmedchildabuserecession.html
An increase in child abuse, mostly involving infants, is linked with the recent recession in new research that raises fresh concerns about the impact of the nation’s economic woes.
The results are in a study of 422 abused children from mostly lower-income families, known to face greater risks for being abused, and the research involved just 74 counties in four states. But lead author Dr. Rachel Berger of Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh said the results confirm anecdotal reports from many pediatricians who’ve seen increasing numbers of shaken baby cases and other forms of brain-injuring abuse.
…
“The counties studied included Pittsburgh and western Pennsylvania; central and southern Ohio; and a handful of counties in northern Kentucky and in the Seattle area. The researchers examined medical records and national labor statistics for 2004 through November 2007 and compared them with data from the recession.
Of the 422 children diagnosed with abusive head trauma during the study, roughly 65 cases occurred each year before the recession, versus about 108 yearly during the recession.
Federal government data suggest that the recession did not affect child abuse rates. But the study authors said those numbers are based on reports from child protective services, not medical diagnoses, and did not address brain injuries specifically.”
…
“Most parents who abuse young children aren’t “ill-intentioned,” he said. “Most of it is kind of just snapping…maybe being sleep-deprived and just losing it. It’s something that can happen to anyone. Economics is just another stress” that can increase the risks, Sherman said.”
Holding down several part time jobs could increase sleep deprivation. And stressed parents or hunger could contribute to fussiness in children.
Child abuse, both physcial but espcially mental, is the biggest obstacle to leaving the poor neighborhoods and breaking the cycle of poverty.
I dont buy that turkey
I believe it’s their lack of English skills and rap music is designed to keep them there, why would good soul blues and clean music not be welcomed today?
…is the biggest obstacle to leaving the poor neighborhoods and breaking the cycle of poverty.
Ray Bradbury (the writer) believed it was the lack of an automobile. (at least in the deep South)
Liberals vow to challenge Obama in Democratic primaries
By Seth McLaughlin
President Obama’s smooth path to the Democratic nomination may have gotten rockier Monday, after a group of liberal leaders, including former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, announced plans to challenge the incumbent in primaries next year.
The group said the goal is to offer up a handful of candidates from various fields and areas where the president either has failed to stake out a “progressive” position or where he has “drifted toward the corporatist right.”
“Without debates by challengers inside the Democratic Party’s presidential primaries, the liberal/majoritarian agenda will be muted and ignored,” Mr. Nader said in a news release. “The one-man Democratic primaries will be dull, repetitive, and draining of both voter enthusiasm and real bright lines between the two parties that excite voters.”
In search of candidates, Mr. Nader and the others sent out a letter, endorsed by 45 “distinguished leaders,”to elected officials, civic leaders, academics and members of the progressive community who specialize among other things in labor, poverty, military and foreign policy. The list, they said, also includes progressive Democrats who have held national and state office and have fought for progressive reforms.
“We need to put strong Democratic pressure on President Obama in the name of poor and working people,” said Cornel West, author and professor at Princeton University who has been highly critical of Mr. Obama’s tenure since helping him get elected in 2008. “His administration has tilted too much toward Wall Street, we need policies that empower Main Street.”
Mr. Nader and Mr. West are joined by Christ Townsend, of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, and Brent Blackwelder, president emeritus of Friends of the Earth.
President Obama’s smooth path to the Democratic nomination may have gotten rockier Monday, after a group of liberal leaders, including former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, announced plans to challenge the incumbent in primaries next year.
Ah, yes. Ralph Nader. The most famous person I’ve ever shot (as a photographer).
President Hillary Rodham Clinton. Get used to the sound of it.
Saw this on the news tonight. I’m glad to see Ralph Nader leading the charge here. I could not agree with him more!
Ralph Nader = Narcissist PR machine, only outdone by $arah “The Rouge”
40% of consumers slash spending
By Deborah Brunswick September 19, 2011
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Worries about the economy and the stock market caused 40% of consumers to cut their spending over the past two months, according to a study on financial security from Bankrate.com.
Americans across all income groups reduced their spending in the last 60 days. Among those earning $75,000 a year or more, 37% cut back. And 43% of households making less than $30,000 spent less.
“This type of widespread cutback in consumer spending, if sustained for any length of time, is how recessions are born,” said Bankrate’s senior financial analyst Greg McBride.
Bankrate’s Financial Security Index for the month of September rose slightly from the previous month, indicating that Americans are feeling better about their personal finances. In August, the index fell to an all-time low amid the debt-ceiling crisis.
However, with 46.2 million people now living in poverty and median incomes on the decline, consumers are feeling less financially secure than they were a year ago.
Hustling ways to make extra cash
More Americans over the age of 30 reported a lower net worth compared to last year, the study found. And across all education levels, more people said their net worth is lower today than it was last year.
Job security was a big concern. Only 23% of respondents under age 30 said they felt more secure in their jobs than they did 12 months ago. Among those between the ages of 50 and 64, only 10% felt more secure in their jobs.
It is all about jobs…
When will we get a politician (better yet, a group of them) who will honestly address our tax and trade policies?
Oh I wish I were a Deadbeat victim loaner
That is what I`d truly like to be
For if I were a Deadbeat victim loaner
I would get to live somewhere for free
I want a free house too.
“I want a free house too.”
Just click your heels together and repeat after me.
I can`t pay this loan
I can`t pay this loan
I can`t pay this loan
This victims rights message has been brought to you by the Law Firm of Robo Loaner & Loaner
Will interest rates ever go up? I am tempted to buy now only because rate are close to 4%. At 8% that $250k house is expensive again.
Dude!
Take a cold shower.
250K at 4 percent = 1193.54
163K at 8 percent = 1196.04
The house prices are heavily set by the monthly payment. If interest rates rise to 8 percent, prices will have downward pressure because of the monthly payment.
Thank you!
It’s too bad most people don’t get this.
The bubble was caused by low interest rates, and the bubble will truly burst when interest rates rise.
Citation: http://www.bankrate.com/calculators/mortgages/mortgage-calculator.aspx
“I am tempted to buy now only because rate are close to 4%. At 8% that $250k house is expensive again.”
Where are you going to find a $250k home on the Central Coast?
The CC is cheap now. Lots to choose from for under $250k.
I have my eye on one fixer at $100k.
At 8% that $250k house is expensive again.
What is it @ 14+% ?
This is in someways a look back at Oly Gal…who viewed Zions Bank as the LDS bank of Utarrr….
There’s an empty “hole” in the most prime location in downtown Boise: the corner of 8th and Main. A building there burned down in 1987 - that’s 24 years ago - and developers who wanted to build there have all come a cropper.
Today Zions Bank announced plans to build a 15 story building there, which will house their Idaho headquarters.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/09/19/1805227/zions-bank-will-build-15-story.html
I’m not sure why they want to spend the money but one would think a bank would know better…..
Guess when it comes to the Mayan Calender, they’re 2012 “Non-Believer$”
Funniest comedy ever!
Federal housing program faces barriers in Florida market
By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 10:24 p.m. Sunday, Sept. 18, 2011
A $15 billion housing program in President Obama’s recently proposed American Jobs Act may face challenges in Florida as similar federal plans toil to overcome a real estate market rife with investors and light on lending.
Dubbed Project Rebuild, the program intends to spur construction jobs with grants to for-profit and nonprofit groups and government entities to buy, renovate and sell foreclosed and abandoned homes in hard-hit neighborhoods.
Florida could receive $2.7 billion from Project Rebuild, which also would allow money to go to homeowners through assistance programs approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The current Neighborhood Stabilization Program has pumped $6.82 billion nationwide to struggling communities hit by high foreclosure rates and with the same basic idea as Project Rebuild: Refurbish and resell.
There’s no question families have benefited from the program, which awarded its first grants in 2009. About 15 rehabbed homes in Palm Beach County have new owners or are leased.
But there have been barriers to success. Program administrators say they’ve been undercut by cash investors when trying to buy foreclosures and stymied by banks with tighter lending standards that exclude too many homebuyers. They also have struggled with competition from homes in nicer communities selling for comparatively low prices.
“It creates the perfect storm against trying to attain your ultimate goal, which is to put income-eligible households into homes,” said Mike McManaman, neighborhood stabilization administrator for Lake Worth’s Community Redevelopment Agency.
Palm Beach County’s take from three Neighborhood Stabilization allocations is about $90 million. Boynton Beach was awarded about $4 million, Lake Worth received $23.2 million and West Palm Beach has $6.4 million to spend. While there is flexibility on how the money can be used, including offering mortgages and building homes, much of it has been directed toward the buy-and-resell approach.
The Lake Worth CRA has closed on about 60 homes in a small area surrounding the city’s downtown and has completed renovations on five townhomes and one condominium. None has sold yet. McManaman expects to have a tally of jobs created from the work in October when the next quarterly report is due to HUD.
Nearly 300 jobs were generated with a portion of Neighborhood Stabilization money awarded to buy and rehab homes, according to the Community Land Trust of Palm Beach County, which is based in West Palm Beach. The trust was a recipient of federal money that flowed through the county. It has purchased seven homes, resold two and has two under contract. Another 11 have been purchased and are being rehabilitated but have not been resold.
But it also has wrangled for properties with cash buyers and faced other obstacles, such as imperfect inspections and appraisals coming in below the agreed-upon purchase price.
“For a first mortgage buyer, the condition of the home has to be excellent for the bank to consider it,” said Cindee LaCourse-Blum, executive director of the trust. “Items that haven’t been issues in forever are now required to be checked off.”
Wellington got about $680,000 through the county for five homes. The homes, one of which is in a gated community, have been on the market since May with no takers yet.
Assistant County Administrator Shannon LaRocque said the county anticipated some of the problems with reselling the homes. Not wanting refurbished but unsold homes, it put much of its Neighborhood Stabilization money into mortgage programs for homeowners who buy foreclosures.
As of last week, 73 homebuyers had received mortgages through the county plan.
“When you buy homes and sell them, so much is depending on the banks’ lending,” LaRocque said.
Still, the county has had to work out kinks. One of its plans was to offer supplemental or second mortgages to homebuyers. The problem was not enough homebuyers could get first mortgages. The county had to request a change in its spending plan, which LaRocque said took eight months for HUD to approve.
Her advice for Project Rebuild: Be more flexible.
“They have to be able to respond very quickly to change,” LaRocque said.
Dubbed Project Rebuild, the program intends to spur construction jobs with grants to for-profit and nonprofit groups and government entities to buy, renovate and sell foreclosed and abandoned homes in hard-hit neighborhoods.
———————-
Grants…so that flippers can, once again, destroy the housing market. Why can’t we just allow housing prices to drop to affordable levels to that people can buy them without having to stretch their finances and get all kinds of new, gimmicky loans?
How much do you want to bet that these govt-paid flippers are making crazy profits (or expecting to) with our taxpayer money???
I HATE, HATE, HATE, HATE FLIPPERS!!!!!!
PIIGCS
Italy downgrade adds to eurozone contagion fears
Standard and Poor’s drops credit rating to A from A+, blaming sluggish economy and ineffective government reforms
Reuters
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 20 September 2011 00.59 EDT
Italy has had its sovereign credit rating cut by Standard and Poor’s , with the ratings agency keeping the country’s outlook on negative in a major surprise that adds to contagion fears in the debt-stressed eurozone.
The agency cut Italy’s government debt rating to A from A+ and said Italy’s economic growth prospects were getting weaker, with planned reforms by the government not expected to help much.
“We believe the reduced pace of Italy’s economic activity to date will make the government’s revised fiscal targets difficult to achieve,” S&P said in a statement.
Italy follows eurozone partners Spain, Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus in having its credit rating downgraded this year.
…
Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2012
LEGEND: Republican Democrat On the fence
= Between 40% and 59% to both parties
= Leans Dem/Repub (60%-69%)
= Strongly Dem/Repub (70%-89%)
= Solidly Dem/Repub (over 90%)
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php - 61k -
Is ‘intentional foreclosure’ ethical?
By Steve McLinden • Bankrate.com
Dear Steve,
I bought a home two years ago that’s now worth $120,000 less than I paid for it. Ouch! What’s more, the bank won’t touch a refinance. But I do have about $80,000 in savings. If I used it for a down payment to buy another home, then let the other go into foreclosure, could the bank come after the equity in the more recently bought home? Yes, it’s a shady thing to do, but I feel it’s my only option.
–Stephen K.
Dear Stephen,
I have been besieged with similar questions. First, it’s unlikely but not impossible that the bank would go after your equity in such a scenario. That said, I can’t in good conscience just say go ahead and arrange such an “intentional foreclosure,” even as the practice becomes increasingly common, particularly in parts of the country that saw huge artificial run-ups in home values earlier this decade.
The first effort on the part of borrowers should always be to seek loan remediation agreements with their lenders/servicers. However, based on media and trade reports, there have been relatively few good outcomes from attempting to do this. The reality is that there are tens of thousands of people out there in similarly challenging situations who are watching as homes just like theirs sell for far less than what they still owe.
I must note that there’s no absolute guarantee in most states that a buyer can just buy another house and walk away unscathed from the other one, aside from absorbing that big, ugly credit splotch, of course. That’s because states often give lenders latitude to sue borrowers in such cases.
However, such “recourse” practices are seldom employed these days because of the expense and the fact that people in these upside-down situations typically have little nonhousing wealth to pursue. Ironically, some credit experts say it will be faster and easier to re-earn a decent credit score after a foreclosure than after a bankruptcy — especially if you have established a new mortgage in the interim.
There are numerous blogs dedicated to the practice that you’re considering and some businesses, such as San Diego-based You Walk Away. Opponents to your strategy have called this “underhanded,” “cheating,” “unethical” and say that agents who facilitate this practice are just coaching people into bigger mistakes. Others say it’s the only way for some people to emerge as homeowners out of this mess.
Hopefully, there’s an important history lesson here for an industry that aggressively marketed so many risky low-down-payment or 100-percent loans with ARMs attached and a government that at least tacitly encouraged them. It’s actually an old lesson: The less skin you have in the game, the easier it is to walk away from the table.
If you do proceed, you would be wise to spend a little of that $80,000 nest egg on a legal representative to review your loan documents to determine if you will be on the hook for anything.
Read more: Is intentional foreclosure ethical? http://www.bankrate.com/finance/real-estate/is-intentional-foreclosure-ethical.aspx#ixzz1YUIbPMUF
“We’re hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn’t anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site,”
I think they what happens to the animals will be shocking too.
PETA to launch porn site in name of animal rights
By Ray Sanchez
Reuters
Posted: 2:56 p.m. Monday, Sept. 19, 2011
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, no stranger to attention-grabbing campaigns featuring nude women, plans to launch a pornography website in the name of animal rights.
The nonprofit organization, whose controversial campaigns draw criticism from women’s rights groups, said it hopes to raise awareness of veganism through a mix of pornography and graphic footage of animal suffering.
“We’re hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn’t anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site,” said Lindsay Rajt, PETA’s associate director of campaigns.
Spanish schools hit by strike over staffing cuts
Anger over Spain’s financial woes spread to schools as Madrid teachers strike over staff cuts
MADRID (AP) — Anger over government austerity measures spread Tuesday to Spain’s education system, as public secondary school teachers in Madrid went on strike to protest staff cuts.
The work stoppage in some 300 schools is to last at least two days and perhaps three, and teachers elsewhere in the country also plan strikes or protests this month against budget cuts.
Teachers say education should be spared as Spain tightens its belt to resurrect its economy, allay fears it might need an international bailout and reinvent itself for the future with a modern, educated workforce after the collapse of an economy fueled largely by a real estate bubble
“We are on strike to improve state education. It is not true that we are on strike because we have to work more. The timetable is the same as we had last year. What we want is better conditions for public teaching,” Pilar Hortal, a 57-year-old English teacher standing at a picket line in Madrid, told The Associated Press.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/110920/eu_spain_financial_crisis.html?.v=1 - -