Something That Never Was
It’s Friday desk clearing time for this blogger. “The vast plains are dotted with the windmills at which Don Quixote once tilted. Squatting incongruously among them is a €1.1 billion ($1.5 billion) white elephant: Ciudad Real’s airport. Other than the chirping of autumn crickets, the silence is absolute. The only signs of life at the visitor centre are bats in the ventilation shafts. This airport tells a tale about Spain. In the past decade, during el boom, money poured in, inflating a huge construction bubble. Grand infrastructure projects like Ciudad Real airport sprouted. Many of Spain’s 17 regional governments channelled cash into trophy schemes—universities, art galleries, high-speed rail—with no concern for whether they would pay their way. They were abetted by the cajas, small unlisted savings banks, often with opaque ownership structures, that lent recklessly on the assumption that property prices could move only in one direction.”
“Earlier this year Spain’s central bank took on the cajas, nationalising some and forcing others to merge. But their asset books are clogged with bad debts and repossessed property. Shrinking credit is a big threat to the economy. ‘Banks need to be helped to do their job,’ says Ignacio Muñoz Alonso, CEO of Addax Capital, a fund manager. ‘That is to lend money, not to be large real-estate managers.’”
“Worse may be to come: property prices are only 22% off their 2008 peak. Guesses at the recapitalisation needs of the cajas run as high as €100 billion.”
“The cult of ruins dates to the 18th century, when the vestiges of ancient Rome acquired a special fascination for artists and writers. In the 18th century, especially if you were a nouveau-riche arriviste, you had to acquire antiquity. You did it by constructing a ‘ruin’ on your property. But the fall of the Celtic Tiger hardly has the weight of the fall of Rome or the end of American industrial might. The half-built houses that scar the landscape are much closer to the other notion of ruins. They are literal and metaphorical follies.”
“A new arriviste ascendancy, with more money than sense, accidentally constructed its own versions of the mock-ruins. Ghost estates are not the relics of glory. They speak to us not of something that used to be but of something that never was. Not only were they abandoned before they were inhabited, but the thing of which they speak – the Irish bubble – was an illusion. They are the vestiges not of a great empire but of a folie de grandeur. This is not a past to be mourned in passive melancholy. It is a political and social outrage, a product of bad economics, bad planning and bad politics.”
“The war in his homeland was a boom time for Sayed Aman Abed. The Kabul real estate broker made a small fortune over the past several years as billions of dollars in foreign aid and reconstruction contracts flooded into Afghanistan, creating a robust market for homebuyers and renters in the capital. Abed, a slight, boyish 25-year-old, did well enough to pick up the entire tab for his wedding last year, which cost $27,000, a princely sum in Afghanistan.”
“But Kabul’s unlikely housing bubble is deflating rapidly. ‘Ever since the Americans announced the drawdown of their forces,’ Abed said, ‘I haven’t sold a single house.’”
“Various marketing strategies are now being used by real estate developers in some Chinese provinces. A developer in Wenzhuo province dangles off a new BMW for a small deposit for the first 150 buyers in the so-called Central Mansions, a cluster of towers with 868 apartments in Wenzhou, according to Global Edge. ‘The BMW deal is a sign of the desperation felt by developers in China’s once-booming property market, which has been pounded by government measures aimed at heading off a bubble,’ the report said.”
“Right now, China is obsessed with the Occupy Wall Street movement, deathly afraid that it will spread there. How can I tell? The China Daily recently ran a column headlined: ‘U.S. Media Blackout of Protest is Shameful.’ So I called the author, Chen Weihua, deputy editor of China Daily USA. He’s based in New York. State-controlled Chinese media have made a festival of Occupy Wall Street coverage, part of the government’s effort to convince its people that they are much better off living in China rather than decadent America, riven with income inequality. ‘The U.S. crisis is a result of the unrestrained freedom for the rich,’ Global Times, a government newspaper, reported.”
“Global Times writer Wang Yizhou, a professor at Peking University, remarked: ‘Things would be very different if the protests took place in China. The government would take powerful measures, and the financial giants would dare not to refuse change.’ The China Digital Times reports that ‘a long list of banned keywords has been uncovered’ that are blocked from display on search engines. Chief among them: the word ‘occupy’ followed by every city in the country, like ‘Occupy Guangzhou.’”
“And a Shanghai news site reports: ‘Multiple sources have told the Shanghaiist that police have been going around bars asking foreigners if they’ve got anything to do with the Occupy Wall Street movement,” afraid that those people ‘might start an Occupy Shanghai.’”
“Some American journalists are guilty of their own overexuberant, even gleeful, reporting on China’s problems. Late last month, a reporter for MarketWatch wrote: ‘Forget Greece. Forget Italy. Forget Occupy Wall Street. The really ominous news right now: China’s housing bubble is finally bursting.’”
“Looking over all of this, Chen, the China Daily columnist, said protesters told him: ‘It’s natural that corporate-controlled media outlets are not going to cover a protest that is fighting excessive corporate influence in society.’ (Sounds like a typical young American protester’s concern, doesn’t it?)”
“When it comes to buying a condo, what’s a better investment? Buying one that’s already built and is being resold, or buying on the hype of a new building that’s yet to be constructed? Jana Masiewich considered both a resale and pre-construction condo before deciding that buying a condo prior to it being built presented a better opportunity for her to make money on her investment.”
“While it might be a wait to move in, the initial financing moves fast. ‘It can be financially daunting to put down 20 per cent in six months. Most people don’t walk into a sales centre with $50,000 in a briefcase,’ says Ms. Masiewich, who is accessing the Home Buyers Plan, her savings, and short-term family loans, to meet the financial requirements. The downside is having this 20 per cent tied up, with no monthly returns, for the next few years.”
“‘Patience is a virtue,’ laughs Ms. Masiewich.”
“Nearly one in six Marin homeowners were underwater on their mortgages in the third quarter, up slightly from the previous quarter but a dramatic jump from the third quarter of 2010. The problem is more pronounced in the northern part of the county, where home prices have fallen most sharply. In parts of Novato, some houses that once sold for $600,000 are now valued at $300,000 to $350,000, said Connie Irwin, an agent for Pacific Union International.”
“‘If people are underwater, I basically tell them to talk to a financial tax person and a bankruptcy person to figure out their options,’ Irwin said. ‘I don’t think it’s worth losing their home if it’s a small amount. I don’t see the market going down dramatically anymore.’”
“‘I know they are destroying lives. If I lose my home, I mean, being up there in age, I’m not going to go house shopping again,’ said Brad Mays, who is facing foreclosure. Mays was victimized twice by banks after buying his dream home in Laughlin. He has a good job with the railroad, but when he sat down to sign final loan documents, the monthly payments listed on the new documents were much higher than what he agreed to pay. Callister calls it a bait and switch.”
“‘They said they would correct it. Let’s just get in the house and correct it. So I signed the loan documents,’ said Mays.”
“Asset markets, in this case, property, are the subject of speculation based upon the delusional premise that past price rises will continue indefinitely into the future, with no chance that a downturn will occur. The dream of creating and realising capital gains has prompted ever more Australians to participate in the property market as either first home buyers or investors (speculators).”
“Incomes rise too slowly and savings are too low to inflate a bubble into the stratosphere. Another ingredient is needed: mortgage debt. Property is not bought for the rental income stream it provides because this is insufficient to finance the debt used to purchase property at inflated prices during a bubble. Since 2000, rental income has not even covered interest charges. No rational individual purchases an asset that generates a net negative yield – but clearly speculators have been pursuing capital gains instead.”
“Australians have shouldered a mountain of debt, readily supplied by the banking system. Mortgage debt currently stands at $843 billion and $359 billion for owner-occupier and investment properties, respectively, for a combined total of $1.2 trillion or approximately 90% of GDP in 2011.”
“The fault of the government lies not in creating these inefficiencies, but rather amplifying them via social engineering and poor tax structures. But rather than implementing policies that will prevent or diminish the possibility of a housing bubble, the Australian government has done the exact opposite.”
“In this vein, business journalist Alan Kohler’s words are priceless: ‘Five years ago Treasurer Peter Costello told Australians: ‘Work for a living and we’ll tax you at close to 50 cents in the dollar; speculate and we’ll only take 25 cents. Not only that but, as a special deal – while stocks last – we’ll pay half your speculating costs.’”
“In ancient times, the Egyptian Pharaohs would decree ‘our pyramids must be strengthened and made larger: find more slaves.’ In modern times, the Australian corporate state declares: ‘our housing pyramid must be kept strong: find more Australian debt-slaves.’”
“He has a good job with the railroad, but when he sat down to sign final loan documents, the monthly payments listed on the new documents were much higher than what he agreed to pay. Callister calls it a bait and switch.” “‘They said they would correct it. Let’s just get in the house and correct it. So I signed the loan documents,’ said Mays.”
Railroaded. So who benefitted from this fraud? Not the bank, or at least not the shareholders of the bank. Probably everyone who got a commission, that’s who.
Genius sequence of events of the “poor victim”:
1) Agree to terms of contract with bank
2) View bank-prepared contract
3) Notice contract is not as contemplated
4) Contract has been modified
5) Gee, we better sign contract before someone else “snaps up” this property (they aren’t makign any more land, you know)
6) Sign document with a half-assed oral promise to modify contract as signed
7) Waaaaaa, I’m a victim, waaaaaa
Are you kidding me? Why would you SIGN that?
This is why a basic fundamentals of law class needs to be mandatory to graduate High School. I won’t be as hard on this buyer as you because I saw this time and time again from 2003-2007. What everyone must know is a verbal contract is meaningless when a written contract is in place. Unfortunately this person was told they’d get it fixed. There’s no way to fix it once the deal is done.
It is even more basic than that. People who “sell” you money are exactly the same as anyone else who sells you anything. They are sales people and their interests are in direct opposition to yours most of the time.
I think a lot of people understand that if the sales person said, “Don’t worry about the store’s return policy. We’ll take it back even if you take the tags off/shred the heel/wait more than 30 days/etc,” that you can’t believe it. Why do they not understand that with a loan? They don’t get that they are dealing with a salesperson.
I think you’re giving the consumer too much credit Polly. That same customer in your example almost certainly would be at the return desk 2 months later with their hand out.
I think you’re giving the consumer too much credit Polly. That same customer in your example almost certainly would be at the return desk 2 months later with their hand out.
I’ve worked retail and have encountered such people. They’re the reason why a lot of stores have cracked down on returns.
Solution to all problems: “May I have that in writing? And oh by the way here’s a stamped addressed envelope to my lawyer. Could you just put a signed copy in there too for him, bless yo’ heart…”
That will send them screaming from the table.
“But we can’t do that, we might not get the house!”
First principle in any negotiation - if you’re not truly willing to walk away entirely (not just bluffing), you’ve already given away the store.
Unless you’re a top notch poker player, of course. But most of us aren’t.
I just think that getting people to think about it in a way that is familiar would help a little. In some stores, the return policy is posted in back of the check out clerk, or printed on your slip. Financial docs can be hundreds of pages of densely printed legal terms that most folks rarely even see, never mind sign. Having a point of reference would help a bit.
Having everyone from high school graduate with basic finanacial and personal legal literacy would be even better, but I don’t think we are ever going to get that.
Must be a lot of people closing without a conselor. I have never done a contract without my own lawyer.
Back in the middle of the last decade, there was this Saturday morning radio show which was a bogus question/answer real estate charade. The hosts would convince caller after caller to extract equity from their homes to buy real estate in other parts of the country.
After a short while it occurred to me that this was a great business plan. Get the suckers, er.. investors to buy the properties [commissions for the hosts] and then use the hosts’ management company to manage the far flung property [income stream from management] for the investor.
All kinds of way to make money for the radio parasites, er… hosts with very little risk.
I remember that show. (on a well known LA FM station).
What a bunch of smooth operators.
As noted, the show hosts got all the real time income from commissions and management fees. The owners/suckers would get income from appreciation.
They also pushed how great it was to be a Section 8 landlord because the “checks always arrive on time”. Guess they forgot about the drug deals, shoot outs and tenants running meth labs.
What was a real kicker was that the hosts were pushing not to buy just one property but to “buy in bulk”. Be the first on your block to own a whole city block of Section 8 rentals.
I think the downsides of landlording are playing out in the next block. Two houses right next to each other:
1. House #1 was the home of a bunch of shady characters. You know the kind. All sorts of tricked-out hoopties racing up and down the street and making brief stops at this place.
Neighbors got suspicious. We made numerous reports to the police about various goings-on.
Well, they just moved out. And you should have seen the lowlifes who came to help them move. Yeesh!
That house is now getting cleaned up and repaired, and it’s looking like quite the job.
2. House #2 had some sort of notice hanging off the front doorknob on Monday. It’s been vacant since the end of August, although people are coming around to do cleanup and repairs.
I figured that the door hanger was a Notice of Trustee Sale. Wrong-o. It was a notice of an animal control investigation. Dog on the property attacked and bit someone.
Hmmm. I didn’t even know there was a dog there.
Yesterday evening, I was walking home from the store, and there was an animal control truck parked by this house. Officer and a couple of women were having words. I couldn’t hear the particulars from across the street, but the tone of the conversation wasn’t sounding too pleasant. And there was a dog barking in the back yard.
This morning, there’s some sort of nastygram posted on the gate that leads into the back yard. I don’t know if it’s an anti-animal control diatribe, but I suspect so.
Slim, this is really sad that your neighborhood has been so affected by the bubble. Was it pretty stable before the bubble took off?
Slim, this is really sad that your neighborhood has been so affected by the bubble. Was it pretty stable before the bubble took off?
According to longtime residents, it was.
.Their back…!!
. Extract equity from you home for you
. Buy out of state (cheap) property
. Put in tennant.
. Manage
. Do all repairs etc.
. All in (their) house, saves YOU from gouging..haha
Their speil..yes we do make a profit, but we put this back into
buying more properties for you. You can then buy more..!!
I listen to this Sat morning LA show for laughs at what their saying..what’s sad, is callers that I thought were shills, I think are actually real, and swallowing it, hook line and sinker. PT Barnum wasn’t wrong.
How can people be protected from themselves, they can’t it seems. So glad I didn’t fall for those, refi, take out equity type deals, that flooded the mail boxes (still do) during the boom.
It all seemed to good to be true, it WAS.
Did refi half way thru a 30, to a 15 at lower int. Kept original payment plus some more, paid it off in under 7 years. Great to
be mortgage free. Didn’t burn the mortgage, got a MERS statement!! Try as I did, couldn’t get back my original mortgage.
I find solace on this blog, were there is sanity. Friends, relatives, co workers are oblivious to what’s going on. I’ve given up trying to explain what is staring them in the face. It’s impossible to predict where we are going. But to be debt free will help.
Happy thanksgiving to all..
…Didn’t burn the mortgage, got a MERS statement!! Try as I did, couldn’t get back my original mortgage…
This is one of the scariest statements I have read in a long time.
If only you receive is a MERS statement at payoff time, how in God’s green earth is title properly re-conveyed?
Do MERS statements hold legal standing with respect to re-conveyance?.
Seems like all of this is a giant loophole to be taken advantage of by scam artists who will try to get a new loan for your already paid off home without your knowledge, etc.
Please somebody with a better legal background tell us all this isn’t true!
So who has the original title? No matter how they sliced and diced the loan, somebody has to have the paper. That’s your house and you have every right to title.
When I paid off my car, they sent me the title, said “congrats you paid off your car, now go to the DMV to get a stamp that says the lien is cancelled.” I still have the paper title.
Wiz - please check with the county that you live in and and make sure that the mortgage was reconveyed and that your title is clear.
If you ever have to sell down the line, finding out that the title isn’t clear - meaning that you are the undisputed owner of the property - will delay a sale for as long as it takes to clean things up.
Property was transfered correctly. Just no return of mortgage.
Just MERS statement reflecting payment satisfaction.
This is some bad journalism. “New” documents showed higher payments than the old(?) documents. What old documents. Then there’s a “refi” which I guess is the same as “correcting” the new documents. Then after 18 months BoA “changes its mind” and reverts to the higher payment. I’ve never seen a mortgage operate like this. Was it a real refi? A trial refi (but the payment goes up?) A correction of the orignial loan?
I can’t figure out what Mays signed.
“China’s housing bubble is finally bursting.”
This should offer hope to California home buyers who are tired of competing with all-cash buyers from Asia.
In my area most of the homes are in the million dollar range and most have been bought in the past 3 years by Asians.
This does make you ask what might happen if they can no longer buy these homes?
“…the delusional premise that past price rises will continue indefinitely into the future, with no chance that a downturn will occur.”
Ignoring the redistributional effects for the moment (e.g. implicit theft from retirees on fixed-income pensions), can’t a determined central bank run the printing press sufficiently fast to ensure that real estate always goes up?
In practice, no. Central banks can print all they want - they can’t actually direct where the money goes or force it to be spent. This is one of the main problems that Bernanke is facing right now.
Ahh, the old “Velocity of Money” problem.
But wait, give the money to government and *they* can be forced to spend it. Problem is, what are they spending it on?
Reducing the population with wars. It’s important work.
“can’t a determined central bank run the printing press sufficiently fast to ensure that real estate always goes up?”
Yes they can, provided that they are willing to allow the price of everything else to go up as well.
The only limit on their ability to print and inflate is political.
Given how many Baby Boomers are about to move on to retirement with nothing saved except their paltry fixed-income pensions, the political negatives of creating 1970s era inflation at this point may give the Fed pause.
Deficits don’t matter, remember? The idea is just to keep GDP growth above the interest rate, no matter what. GDP is largely government spending, so spend what you have to, where it is politically correct, and go about your business. It doesn’t matter to the pols what interest rates are, they can handle the required spending.
No the other guy was right. Just because more money is printed does not mean it will be put in average peoples paychecks where it would cause real estate to go up. Unlike the 1960-1970 era where unions still got cost of living increases, price increases no longer mean anyhting but higher profits for corporations. That money is stolen by the corporate insiders and has little effect on the general housing market.
“Jana Masiewich considered both a resale and pre-construction condo before deciding that buying a condo prior to it being built presented a better opportunity for her to make money on her investment.”
“While it might be a wait to move in, the initial financing moves fast. ‘It can be financially daunting to put down 20 per cent in six months. Most people don’t walk into a sales centre with $50,000 in a briefcase,’ says Ms. Masiewich, who is accessing the Home Buyers Plan, her savings, and short-term family loans, to meet the financial requirements. The downside is having this 20 per cent tied up, with no monthly returns, for the next few years.”
________________________/
No, the downside is that Ms. Masiewich is going lose that 20%, and be broke and living with her relatives, once the Canadian bubble pops. Which is likely to make for some difficult dinner conversations, seeing as how she gambled away family money on a stupid pipe dream.
How much money is she spending on a condo when she doesn’t even have $50K to her name? And who are the relatives who think this is a good enough idea to want to help?
Arrggg….
$50K = 20% down +/- for closing costs –> about a $230K condo. This is in downtown Toronto. That’s bubble pricing.
I think the political consequence of this foolishness, when it ends, might be the long-forecasted break-up of Canada. I’ve speculated here before on whether Spain will stay together. When I was there a couple of years ago, the principal Barcelona paper editorialized on Catalan nationalism and had a drawing of a volcano emitting steam. The leaders of Western democracies have made it clear that everything is on the table if the alternative is the failure of large financial institutions. I don’t think they’ve quite grasped the implications of that value judgment.
I’ve speculated here before on whether Spain will stay together. When I was there a couple of years ago, the principal Barcelona paper editorialized on Catalan nationalism and had a drawing of a volcano emitting steam.
I can recall hearing similar rumblings when I was in Spain during the 1970s.
People in Valencia would proudly tell me that they were not Spanish. No way. They were Valenciano. And they’d proceed to teach me some key phrases in Valenciano.
It’s quite possible that the austerity demanded by the financial industry will require a dictatorship at some point. And I doubt the imposition of a Madrid-based autocratic government will be accepted; less than forty years have elapsed since Franco. Montjuic was rebranded after the Barcelona Olympics, but Catalans know the historic purpose for the prison and fortifications up there.
We’ll have to see what happens. Some of this is blue sky thought, but political change can be very sudden, especially when the underlying economic and resource edifice is so rotten. I remember when the USSR collapsed. I had just taken several college courses focusing on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, and not one professor or student or textbook in any of those classes predicted what in fact was imminent. I know I didn’t think it.
Good to see you, Snake
“The leaders of Western democracies have made it clear that everything is on the table if the alternative is the failure of large financial institutions. I don’t think they’ve quite grasped the implications of that value judgment.”
Those Western Democracy governments need those large financial institutions in order to continue operating. If the big banks go, central gov’t will not be able to continue operating and everything will fall apart.
I agree with you…sacrificing geographic parts of your country (or people) to keep the rest intact may be the result of all this.
“How much money is she spending on a condo when she doesn’t even have $50K to her name? And who are the relatives who think this is a good enough idea to want to help?”
Maybe it’s the only way they could get her out of the house. I used to have a neighbor whose family paid rent on three apartments and 5 storage units just to keep her out of their hair.
Maybe it’s the only way they could get her out of the house. I used to have a neighbor whose family paid rent on three apartments and 5 storage units just to keep her out of their hair.
My mother did the same thing with her mother. Grandma had been crashing with her sister in FL. The plan was that Grandma would find her own FL abode, but nothing was up to her lofty standards.
So Grandma’s sister kicked her out.
Grandma came up to PA, hoping my family would take her in. I have the feeling that if we did, my dad would have left Mom to raise me herself.
So, Mom got Grandma into a nearby hotel, and then into an apartment. Where she lived until she had to go into a nursing home. She died in the county home, which is where she went after the nursing home got too $$.
It’s nice to see Wall Street bankers and the Communist leaders of China agree that the Occupy xxx protests should not be allowed.
Protests are meaningless if we continue to vote for people because they have a D or an R after their name. The Democrats will takeover this occupy nonsense in the same manner that Republicans took over the tea party.
Don’t count on it, Andy.
Yeah, I bet that’s something they could really work together on.
From the article on Spain:
“After a couple of years of misery, in which passenger numbers came nowhere near estimates, the airport’s managers filed for bankruptcy. It is tempting to call the project quixotic, but the owners got there first: the airport was opened under the name ‘Don Quijote’ in 2008.”
________________________/
This is as bad as that absurd Miami condo whose ground floor pillars were shaped like Easter Island statues. The background of Cervantes’ novel is Spain in decline, for Christ’s sake.
State-controlled Chinese media have made a festival of Occupy Wall Street coverage, part of the government’s effort to convince its people that they are much better off living in China rather than decadent America, riven with income inequality. ‘The U.S. crisis is a result of the unrestrained freedom for the rich,’
China: “Money is the root of all Evil!”
USA: “Lack of money is the root of all Evil!”
China: “Lack of money is the root of all Evil!”
USA: “Money is the root of all Evil”
Lucy: “Hwy50 you’re such a BLOCKHEAD!”
Tankxs Mr. Ben, that was a good find.
“In this vein, business journalist Alan Kohler’s words are priceless: ‘Five years ago Treasurer Peter Costello told Australians: ‘Work for a living and we’ll tax you at close to 50 cents in the dollar; speculate and we’ll only take 25 cents. Not only that but, as a special deal – while stocks last – we’ll pay half your speculating costs.’”
“In ancient times, the Egyptian Pharaohs would decree ‘our pyramids must be strengthened and made larger: find more slaves.’ In modern times, the Australian corporate state declares: ‘our housing pyramid must be kept strong: find more Australian debt-slaves.’”
“Bidne$$ is Bidne$$” all.around.the.Globe.
“
Australians_________________ have shouldered a mountain of debt, readily supplied by the banking system.““
Australians_________________ have shouldered a mountain of debt, readily supplied by the banking system.““
Australians_________________ have shouldered a mountain of debt, readily supplied by the banking system.““
Australians_________________ have shouldered a mountain of debt, readily supplied by the banking system.““
Australians_________________ have shouldered a mountain of debt, readily supplied by the banking system.““When it comes to buying a condo, what’s a better investment? Buying one that’s already built and is being resold, or buying on the hype of a new building that’s yet to be constructed?
When it comes to buying a condo, what’s the worst investment? Buying one that’s already built and will fall apart in 5 years, or buying a new building that’s yet to be constructed and will fall apart before being built?
Best answer: Just don’t buy.
It’s interesting that with all the talk about Greece and Italy that it’s really Spain that has the potential to blow up the EU. It’s incredible that they have the third largest amount of debt in the world considering the size of their economy. They are a ticking time bomb that is not going away soon.