November 29, 2011

Bits Bucket for November 29, 2011

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

297 Comments »

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 04:18:54

Black Friday weekend: Record $52.4 billion spent

By Jessica Dickler @CNNMoney
November 27, 2011: 7:07 PM ET

Total spending over the four-day weekend following Thanksgiving reached a record $52.4 billion, up 16% from $45 billion last year, according to a survey by the National Retail Federation released Sunday.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/27/pf/black_friday/index.htm - 60k

Where do they get the money to shop?

Home foreclosures starting to rise again
By Chris Isidore November 17, 2011: 10:50 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Home foreclosure filings rose in the third quarter, as recent declines in the rate of new foreclosures came to an end, according to an industry trade group.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/17/real_estate/home_foreclosures/index.htm - 67k

Comment by DF
2011-11-29 07:29:13

The thing to watch is how much people spend the rest of the holiday season. They might be condensing their shopping to the Thanksgiving weekend in order to milk all of the deals. I can tell you that’s what I did.

Financial Times seems to agree with me:
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e592b82a-19e9-11e1-b9d7-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1f6XOQ9s7

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 08:40:07

I suspect that as well. I picked up some new clothes, bought some booze and eatables.

Comment by ahansen
2011-11-29 10:45:25

I find it very hard to be thankful, let alone festive, in a crowd of sneezy people expelling the off-gassing of yesterday’s overindulgence, but to each his own….

There is a hubbub about too many people in too-limited spaces that makes me think of that scene in Dr. Zhivago where the Bolsheviks divvy up Yuri’s lovely ancestral home into apartments for the starving rabble, and he and his books are forced into a storage closet up in the attic.

Ancient mahogany wainscotting become fuel for cooking fires, babies squall and puke on marble mosaic below while he gamely allows some old apparatchik babushka to take over the apportionment and scold him for his bourgeoise sentimentality.

Some people cite the shower scene in Psycho as the seminal blood-curdler, some the “Honey I’m Home” scene from The Shining. But for sheer horror, the haunted look on Zhivago’s face when the comrade-yahoo woman uses his great-grandmother’s Imperial Czarist porcelain as a chamber pot is the one that most resonates with me.
But I digress….

Though it’s tempting to ascribe to political integrity my refusal to join in the Black Friday (that term always makes me think of the plague,) consumerist zeitgeist, I think it’s actually a disdain for the enforced community of the whole thing (and the overall corporate shoddiness of the offerings.) I don’t enjoy sporting events for the same reason…the reversion to mob mentality is just too close to the surface for my tastes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by lizpendens
2011-11-29 15:22:05

I love reading your posts more than I am sure you enjoy composing them :). There is some strange sense of relief that comes from creatively documenting the alarming greed-driven shortcomings of our “advanced” society. Nature is no fool. Thank you for sharing your appreciated thoughts.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2011-11-29 20:56:47

Beautiful, ahansen. We have more in common than I ever knew..

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 21:43:59

“…my refusal to join in the Black Friday (that term always makes me think of the plague)…”

Hah! The term always makes me think of Black Monday

 
 
 
Comment by Jim A
2011-11-29 09:01:28

Me, I can’t stand the crowds and the crazy on black Friday. I wonder to what extant psychologically the amount of effort and pain of shopping on BF gets incorporated into givers mental accounting of how much they’re giving. Something like “This gift is very special because I had to wait in line for hours to buy it.” Like a much smaller version of part of the mental process that goes on in military basic training. “This organization is so hard to get in that it must be worthwhile.”

Comment by redrum
2011-11-29 10:10:21

One of the most important life lessons I’ve learned is to disassociate cost from value.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 09:48:39

I can say that the few shopping centers I passed after work on Monday have no more cars in the parking lot than normal, and that’s not a lot.

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 09:30:57

I had my car worked on. Does that count?

Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 16:14:26

Small Business Saturday?

 
 
Comment by AZGolfer
2011-11-29 12:30:21

It seems to me that every year the banks back off on the foreclosures until after the holidays. Bad press to be kicking the poor homeowner out before the holidays. I expect to see an increase after the first of the year. Does anyone agree with me?

The house across the street from me has had the action date pushed back several times. The guy has been living payment free for over a year. Also not paying the association fees which makes the rest of us pay more.

 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk VA
2011-11-29 13:13:25

Friends of mine showed up with some black Friday goods. Some tablet computer things they got for $250 each, down from $400. Mind you, neither have jobs — but they have leads on jobs I think. Credit I guess. Both just graduated college on GI bill.

I’m going to buy a 32″ 1080p HD TV from craigslist for $25, then invest $50 into it to hopefully make it work. If I get it working, it will go to my parents as a gift.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 05:01:56

Amy Hoak’s latest NAR-sponsored puff piece, this is like the 2nd one in 2 weeks, NAR must have upped their ad buy :)

How to know whether it’s time to buy a home
Six considerations for those weighing whether to rent or buy

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) — As another year of the housing downturn ends, some are wondering if it finally is more advantageous to buy instead of rent, given discounted home prices and mortgage rates near historical lows.

The answer not only depends on where you live, but also your personal finances, the stability of your job and what you expect for home prices and rental rates in the years ahead.

Historically, renting has been the better choice, according to recent research.

Renting was the better move about 75% of the time, according to “Lessons from over 30 years of buy versus rent decisions: Is the American Dream always wise?,” a paper scheduled for publication next year.

The catch: Renters need to invest all the money they saved.

“We find that if people don’t invest the money, actually about 90% of the time, you’re better off buying,” said Eli Beracha of East Carolina University, who co-authored the paper with Ken H. Johnson of Florida International University.

That’s because for many Americans, their home has become a sort of forced savings account, allowing them to build savings through home equity.

That said, the case for buying a home is getting more compelling for many, according to the report, especially as monthly mortgage payments become more competitive with rental payments.

Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 06:25:35

This is a puff piece for about 90% of the population. I think I fall into the 10% where this may apply.

Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 07:43:39

See also article just posted on Bloomberg: Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Decline More Than Forecast (suprisingly the word unexpectedly doesn’t appear in the article). The chart at the bottom of the article says that DC prices have dropped only 1.02% from three years ago, followed by Boston 4.09%, Denver 4.21%, and Dallas 4.52%.

 
 
Comment by ProperBostonian
2011-11-29 14:21:32

“That’s because for many Americans, their home has become a sort of forced savings account, allowing them to build savings through home equity.”

What a crock. What I see is that the home becomes a means to borrow ever more and more money. My neighbor’s son just went off to college. What’s the first thing she does? Has her house appraised so she can get a home equity loan for his college expenses. Then she tells me what a good investment a house is because hers has appreciated by $75,000 (only $25,000 according to city assessor) since she bought it in 2000. Then she goes on to list all the expenses she’s incurred which more than equal $75,000, not including taxes and interest on the mortgage.

 
Comment by buckwheat
2011-11-29 23:22:53

Mortgage payments in my neighborhood have dropped below rent within the last 6 months. Average rent is 2k for an average house, mortgage (assuming 20% down) is about 1700 with PITI. I’m thinking about offering to buy our place from the LL…

 
 
Comment by ZekeinVABeach
2011-11-29 05:10:45

Abraham Lincoln, the Prophet. In his last message to Congress he said:
“As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an area of corruption in high places will follow, and the money, power of the country will endevor to prolong its reign by working on the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggragrated in a few hands and the Replublic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of the war. God grant that my suspicions may prove to be groundless.”

Personally, I do not feel that I can add anything of value to Mr. Lincolns statement. I do however, have new insight as to why he was assinated.

Comment by Jim A
2011-11-29 09:03:02

A cursory review of Grant’s term as president would seem to show that he was not far from the mark.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 09:34:59

It was a few years after his death that corporations were granted initial personhood.

“In Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886), an insertion into the decision’s headnotes by the clerk, J.C. Bancroft Davis, led many to believe the Supreme Court had recognized corporations as persons for the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment”

- Wikipedia

 
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 10:01:10

Back then, actors didn’t make enough money to be one-percenters.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 05:22:49

Realtors Are Liars®

Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 07:17:38

What does that make MarketWatch columnist Amy Hoak then?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 09:35:42

GoonMan……. Isn’t she a beaut? I wonder how much NAR, MBA and NAHB is paying her?

That’s ok because her articles are reaItor magnets. I hunt and excute Iying reaItors on MW.

 
 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2011-11-29 08:13:15

You, sir, are giving a bad name to liars. There are some liars who have some sense of morality when it comes to the levels to which they will go to deceive others. Perhaps Con-artists, Grifters, or Flim-flam maestros would be more appropriate. A little obsfucation is not so bad as a huge fabrication.
“if you don’t buy now, you’ll be priced out forever”.
“There’s never been a better time to buy.”
Real estate always goes up?” You see my point.

vs……………”it’s a great neighborhood.” when you can see its a ghetto.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 09:22:48

You know…. you have a point. But I’ve developed this belief that keeping it simple and accurate seems to deliver a greater punch.

Kind of like “congressional campaign contributions versus the truth which is “Corrupt Congressman soliciting bribes”.

I had a question for you yesterday. Did you see it? I’ll ask you here.

Do you think your congressional whore is cheaper than my congressional whore?

Congressmen Are Whores®

Where is my old HBB friend Congressmen Are Whores®?

Comment by Sabrina
2011-11-29 14:31:42

Insult to whores if you ask me. They at least make people happy in real time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2011-11-29 20:13:48

My Congressman is too stupid to know what he is doing, so any offer would probably do. I vote your whore to be the more expensive of the 2. As group, however, they are massively overpriced. We get street-whore service for call-girl pricing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 22:39:27

Well…. Congressional Whores are much too costly for peons like me. It seems I pay, pay and pay more and get nothing from Congressional Whores. Congressional Whores certainly service high rollers though. Such is the life of a Congressional Whore. They whore themselves to the highest bidder. Congressional Whores are the types that need to be jailed.

Do you think Congressional Whores should be jailed? I do.

And dammit! Where is my long lost cohort and blog contributor Congressmen Are Whores®? You out there buddy?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2011-11-29 05:23:19

Is Christmas over yet? Seriously. I’m already sick of the feeding frenzy mentality. How do people who actually celebrate the holiday deal with the way it is treated?

Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 05:28:37

They spend money they don’t have?

Comment by palmetto
2011-11-29 05:44:06

I have come to really despise the “holiday” season. What’s “holiday” about it? It’s a huge distraction and gives everyone a reason to take a dump and put off decisions (it’s the holidays!) People turn into worse idiots than they are the rest of the year. Ask anyone who tries to do business on anything other than a retail trinket level. It’s all push ‘n shove and road rage and crappy decorations.

Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 05:49:24

“It’s all push ‘n shove and road rage and crappy decorations.”

But, but, but … does this move merchandise off the shelf?

Yes? Then expect a continuation of the push ‘n shove and road rage, etc. More even.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 05:53:45

Sheep are sheared, what?, once a year?

Sheeple are sheared every day of the year, but some days the shearing is a wee bit closer to the flesh than on other days. We have now entered the season of “close to the flesh”.

 
Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 05:57:49

One thing neat about shearing sheeple is you don’t have to spend a lot of time rounding them up. Instead you condition them to come to you.

 
Comment by palmetto
2011-11-29 06:02:41

An excerpt from Jim Goad’s article on the Black Friday brawls over at Takimag:

“No one’s forcing these slovenly idiot hairballs to club one another over the heads for flat-screen TVs. I’ve been exposed to the supposedly irresistible allure of capitalist advertising for five decades now, yet it never compelled me to knee someone in the groin for a cheaper iPad. If any of these baseball-cap-wearing ass-sores clawing over one another at midnight to score a discounted toaster oven using their nearly tapped-out credit card had the slightest chance to be a despised villainous oligarch, they’d cannibalize every peasant within a hundred miles and then go out for lobster puffs with champagne. This isn’t to say that greed is inherently good, only to point out that it’s not confined to those who’ve been successful at it. Much of this recent robotic class-war fist-pumping can be summarized with the popular ghetto term “player-hating.”

http://takimag.com/article/the_black_friday_brawls/print#ixzz1f6BsieeE

 
Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 06:17:42

“Black Friday brawls”? What is this, a form of reverse mugging.

Instead of fighting with others to get money these people are fighting with others to get rid of it.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:00:32

Crazy, ain’t it?

…and that’s why we’re forked.

 
Comment by Steve J
2011-11-29 10:39:07

Christmas had a tradition of drunken brawls and fighting for most of the past 2000 years.

It was one of the reasons the Pilgrims left England.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 06:38:20

The holiday part is for the young children. When done right, Chirstmas decorations (any holiday decor) looks pretty nice, and kids still ike toys.

How this turned into a war for flat screen TV’s is beyond me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 06:48:31

I think people get a little extra crazy/depressed when the daylight starts getting so short. The ‘holiday season’
(really the winter solstice- when the days are at their very shortest) was originally designed to get our minds off the darkness, and to celebrate the beginning of the end of the darkness.

We probably shouldn’t have our elections at this time of year, either.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 07:57:34

I love the pageantry, the music, and the real message of Christmas. The “stuff” should be left for the kids from Santa, but in a few presents, tame form. I’ve read after 5, the presents lose their punch.

We follow the Magical Christmas Caroling Truck and the Circus size Train, full of carolers through the streets. We all wear Christmas hats, sing along, and belong to a happy annual event. Even the four legged friends have fun.

The rest of the hoopla, we skip.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 06:51:03

FWIW, Black Friday was pretty tame in our neck of the woods. I even ventured out to buy a couple of shirts for myself. It didn’t look all that busy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-11-29 07:45:55

My son said his friend texted him at 2 am from some major line somewhere. It didn’t sound 2nd hand like it was his idea to be there. I guess he might have been there to help carry heavy items.

We went to Best Buy late in the day on Black Friday the traffic was heavier but no lines. The one item I was interested in was sold out. However I could go back home and order it online for the same price w/o a problem.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 09:53:43

Here in Tucson, I went to a bike shop to order something for a bike that I’m working on updating. But for Yours Truly, the place was deserted. I felt sorry for the lone employee. She seemed bored out of her mind.

Then I went to a local restaurant at the far end of a very busy strip shopping center. Place was only about half full at its busiest. And this was the lunch rush, mind you.

Afterward, I went to the library. Which was jam-packed for the entire time I was there.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 11:12:21

My youngest daughter and her boyfriend went to Wal Mart at midnight on Black Friday. Along with a bunch of their friends.

They weren’t buying anything, they just wanted to watch the brawls. Nothing funnier/more entertaining than watching a couple of hillbillies wrestling on the floor, fighting over a video game console.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-29 11:14:23

Now THERE is a perspective I’d not considered. Suggests a whole new arena for MMA fans….

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 11:29:51

Nothing funnier/more entertaining than watching a couple of hillbillies wrestling on the floor, fighting over a video game console.

I guess for some people saving $50 on an Xbox is worth a bloody nose.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 11:33:02

Run in front of the stampeding herd of morons headed toward the flat screens- it’s just like being in Pamplona!

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 11:50:33

Local radio show a couple of years back had people call in with their “Black Friday” stories.

One guy calls in about going to Wal Mart with his mom, who wanted to get a Playstation. Doors open and the mad rush to electronics starts, he saunters in behind the mob.

When he gets to the back of the store, he finds his mom and some other woman wrestling on the floor over the last one in stock.

When asked what he did, he says “I just watched and laughed, and yelled out “You can take her, mom!!”

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 11:54:51

“MMA fans”

That’s exactly what she said. Said that the only problem is that women always seem to want to grab a big chunk of their opponents hair.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 16:19:09

There’s a Simpsons parody of that. Bart plays the arcade game of “Mall Fight” which is clearly a parody of Mortal Kombat. Two women fight over on pair of shoes, while the announcer guy says “The hair. Go for. the hair…. finish herrrrrr.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 06:06:46

Yesterday,I went to the post office to buy stamps and pick up our p o box mail, and it was a mad house, so I left. Packages galore, you’d think it was the last mailing day.

It pays to be a deadbeat on your mortgage.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 09:55:07

For the past several years, I’ve noticed that the holiday post office lines are very heavy on people mailing packages.

The Christmas card mailers? Not so much. Methinks that Christmas cards are going out of fashion.

Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 10:09:31

Slim
We use to do the Christmas card mailing thing, but at 44C a pop, that’s history. We get maybe 2-4 cards these days.
I heard postage was going up Jan 22nd, 2012 on 1st class to 45C. Still won’t save their a@s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 10:58:51

I’m noticing the same thing, Awaiting. I’m getting just a handful of Xmas cards, and that’s it.

As for sending them, I haven’t done that for many years. It just didn’t seem to be worth the effort anymore. And don’t get me started on the cost.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 12:02:59

Helpful shipping hint:

Check out “Fedex Ground”. Usually cheaper than UPS. You get a tracking number, and you don’t have to pay for a delivery confirmation/receipt, like you do with the USPS.

You’ll have to use a debit/credit card to pay. They don’t carry much cash at the regular Fedex sites.

If presented for shipment before noon-1pm, it will usually be delivered next day to addresses within 200 miles. Shipments from the Midwest to either coast are usually 2-3-4 days.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 11:32:37

For the past several years, I’ve noticed that the holiday post office lines are very heavy on people mailing packages.

Maybe it’s also because the post office is way cheaper than UPS (especially if you can use media mail). The last time i tried to ship something via UPS I almost had a heart attack when I saw the price (I then marched over to the post office). I guess they have to make up for the low rates they charge Amazon.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk VA
2011-11-29 13:25:16

Huge lines at the post office because they are slow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SaladSD
2011-11-29 16:02:17

Correction, the people posting stuff are slow… as in bringing unpackaged items to the counter, not having shipping tape, not having their package properly addressed or addressed at all, etc. etc. The postal clerks are incredibly patient. I’d definitely go postal….

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 06:44:26

How do people who actually celebrate the holiday deal with the way it is treated?

1) Watch as little TV as possible
2) Stay away from all malls, big box stores, etc.
3) Throw all of the sales flyers straight into the rcycling bin

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-11-29 06:48:45

‘Throughout “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley, the concepts of consumption and utopia are constantly juxtaposed and compared to determine whether or not they are genuinely compatible. Although one could state that the citizens of this world in “Brave New World” are genuinely happy, this is more a result of ignorance and blindness rather than a truly fulfilling sense of bliss. Because the state in “Brave New World” has meticulously given consumption an almost holy significance, the culture that exists around it must accordingly be conducive to it.’

‘As a result as the constant emphasis on consumption in “Brave New World” the signifiers of identity such as a concept of nature, religion, and self, have been obliterated to foster a powerful and complete reliance on the state. Because of the almost infantile degree of dependence the state has created in “Brave New World” the culture of consumption is able to thrive. It is only through the character of John, who is most allied with our perception of reality, that the reader is able to discern how the ideas of consumption and utopia cannot be compatible. Through his eyes, it is possible to see how instead of creating happiness in “Brave New World” by Huxley the combination of these two opposing forces breeds dependence and destroys the individual.’

http://www.articlemyriad.com/68.htm

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 06:52:48

Plus aren’t they all stoned on soma?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by BlueStar
2011-11-29 07:02:17

Ben, Did you ever watch “The Century of Self” by Adam Curtis?
It’s documentary series about the history of advertising and consumer society, about ethics (and their absence), about notions of the self and its manipulation in the interests of power and profit. In “Century of the Self” Adam Curtis lays bare the mechanisms of consumerist brainwashing. He does so using archival footage, amateur videos and interviews of great historical and ideological value.
A lot of what Aldous Huxley portrayed in Brave New World is vividly illustrated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 07:13:39

You can watch it on the net. Just google “the century of self”. It will be presented to you in parts.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 07:21:33

BlueStar
I am very familiar with the documentary and the man, having read books on him. Truly, once you’ve been introduced to the Engineering Of Consent there is no turning back.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-11-29 08:29:40

Blue:

Think of diamonds, a relativly rare item but with very little uses, outside of drilling heads and bits and record styluses, (and we all know how many people still play records)

So how did it wind up on hundreds of millions of womens 2nd finger?

bare the mechanisms of consumerist brainwashing.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 10:47:07

RE “Century of Self”: it is a must watch. “The Policeman Inside Your Head” was a memorable chapter.

RE diamonds: if you can make your product equal to love (to many), you win. If the CCD process didn’t require N2 (and turn them yellow), we would have gone with those. Canadian was the best we could do and their discovery is very cool.

RE record players: the movers broke the cover, but she still plays!

RE carousel: Great reference. “Look! It’s clear!”

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-29 10:59:43

The female fascination with small glittery things is biologically ingrained in many species. As is the human female’s social hierarchic requirement, which requires a passive display of the dominant male’s relative social position.

Though clever, the diamond cartels have done nothing more than exploit human genetics. Diamonds are a highly portable signifier– like a car or a house you can take into a gathering with you. It’s easier to wear your status on your finger than lug it around on a cart piled high with cannon balls.

Power takes on many facets….

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 11:14:45

AHansen — what about matriarchies like those in some Uighur communities where the women have multiple mates who fight over her — sort of a reverse elk herd or Brother Husband thing? Shouldn’t we see reverse marketing from DeBeers for them?

“Diamonds: render him speechless” (or just give him a bag of beef jerky and a copy of Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim)

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-29 16:02:23

More mates=more diamonds.
Them Uighur ladies ain’t stupid.

Not sure how to explain New Jersey, though.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 16:19:56

Well played!

 
 
Comment by chilidoggg
2011-11-29 08:14:32

Carrousel is a LIE!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2011-11-29 08:23:41

If you don’t believe in Carousel, how can you hope for ‘renewal’?
I mean, really, you must be some kind of lame-brained moron!

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2011-11-29 11:38:42

‘A friend of mine went on carousel. Now he’s gone. ‘

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-11-29 08:38:12

It’s humbling to learn how thoroughly and accurately some were able to comprehend our current path so many years ago (BNW - 1931).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-11-29 07:49:55

How do people who actually celebrate the holiday deal with the way it is treated?

1) Watch as little TV as possible
2) Stay away from all malls, big box stores, etc.
3) Throw all of the sales flyers straight into the rcycling bin

4) Stay away from the shopoholics w/stars in their eyes and stories of “the get”.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 09:16:18

LOL! That too! I must run in good circles, as I never meet people like that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2011-11-29 14:08:48

I minimize my exposure to the commercialized frenzy by avoiding all shops, except for groceries, between Thanksgiving and New Year’s Day.

Comment by Montana
2011-11-29 15:28:16

I do the same. Makes it kinda hard, when someone breathlessly asks

Comment by Montana
2011-11-29 15:29:35

…GOT ALL YOUR SHOPPING DONE?? and I have to remind myself what in hell he’s talking about.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 05:27:34

polly asked…

“How do people who actually celebrate the holiday deal with the way it is treated?”

Well,

Burl Ives - A Holly Jolly Christmas lyrics

Have a holly jolly Christmas
Cause you paid no rent this year
I don’t know if there’ll be snow
But eviction you don`t fear

Have a holly jolly Christmas
And when you walk down your street
Say hello to friends you know
Even the Deadbeats

Oh, ho the mistletoe hung where you can see
They`ve lived here for five years, last three years for free

Have a holly jolly Christmas
And in case you didn’t hear,
Deadbeats set a Black Friday shopping record, this year!

Have a holly jolly Christmas
Don`t forget to pay your rent,
If you do, I know that you
Will be living in a tent.

Oh, ho the mistletoe hung where you can see
She got a diamond ring, thanks to living free!

Have a holly jolly Christmas
And in case you didn’t hear,
Deadbeats gonna have a holly jolly Christmas this year!

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 06:26:55

BRAVO Jethro!!!!

Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 09:12:39

Jeff - Kudos!

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 06:57:42

Does anyone have a hard stat on what percentage of “homeowners” are deadbeats? I ask because I have yet to meet one. I know a lot of people on SNAP, but no one who is living rent free (I do know a few who have been foreclosed and evicted).

I suspect that the holiday binge spending is probably localized to where the few good paying jobs remain. As for the “stats” of Black Friday sales being up substantially, haven’t we leaned to not trust the numbers from the Ministries of Truth and Plenty?

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 07:41:32

“I suspect that the holiday binge spending is probably localized to where the few good paying jobs remain.”

Hundreds line up in darkness, chill to save cold cash at Kohl’s in Boynton on Black Friday

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Posted: 5:35 a.m. Friday, Nov. 25, 2011

BOYNTON BEACH — A chill wind and full bellies didn’t deter the more than 450 early-bird shoppers in the queue at Kohl’s late Thursday night waiting for the special midnight opening.

Crowds snap up bargains, snacks at Boynton Beach Mall

Shoppers fill Macy’s inside the Boynton Beach Mall after the store opened the doors at midnight Black Friday morning.

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 5:53 a.m. Friday, Nov. 25, 2011

BOYNTON BEACH — Black Friday at the Boynton Beach Mall is a little like being in a Las Vegas casino. At nearly 2 a.m., it might as well noon.

Food court restaurants such as Subway, Popeyes, Taco Bell and Sbarro’s Pizzeria are open and bustling as they cater to shoppers hungry for a post-Thanksgiving snack or early breakfast. Music pumps through mall speakers. And bargain hunters mingle with shuffling teenagers socializing.

Black Friday ‘a madhouse’ for 2 Lake Worth veteran shoppers in Boynton Beach

By Kimberly Miller and Emily Roach
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Updated: 3:50 p.m. Friday, Nov. 25, 2011
Posted: 6:00 a.m. Friday, Nov. 25, 2011

Wafa, who thought the crowds and craziness would be fun, had nothing for herself and said she was pretty much over Black Friday.

One nephew, Abdelgani Aziz of Boynton Beach, had suggested they give Black Friday shopping a try, even after seeing the lines earlier in the evening. He landed a PlayStation 3 and was happy.

“I came to see the line,” he said.

Shoppers pull all-nighters

By Emily Roach Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 8:13 p.m. Friday, Nov. 25, 2011

ROYAL PALM BEACH — Caffeine and camaraderie fueled this year’s unprecedented all-night Black Friday shopping expeditions.

“We look at it as an adventure,” says Jennifer Sullivan of Royal Palm Beach. “We’re just here to have fun.”

At 9 p.m. Thursday, Sullivan, Julie Fanning and Tracey Sullivan are in line at the Toys R Us on U.S. 441 near Belvedere Road.

Fanning, also of Royal Palm Beach, says they will have to “motivate each other” when fatigue sets in. That will happen around 2 a.m. at Walmart, when Sullivan is “feeling rough.” Chicken McNuggets and a Rockstar energy drink do the trick.

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 3/21/2006 10:06:28
CFN: 20060163709
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 20079/904
Pages: 23
Consideration: $185,200.00
Party 1: FANNING TIMOTHY P
FANNING JULIE ELIZABETH
Party 2: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA INC
Legal: 27 43 41 POR ACRE

Type: MTG
Date/Time: 3/21/2006 10:08:14
CFN: 20060163725
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 20079/946
Pages: 10
Consideration: $46,300.00
Party 1: FANNING TIMOTHY P
FANNING JULIE ELIZABETH
Party 2: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA INC
Legal: 27 43 41 POR ACRE

Type: LP
Date/Time: 1/15/2009 12:51:47
CFN: 20090017874
Book Type: O
Book/Page: 23037/1799
Pages: 2
Consideration: $0.00
Party 1: US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TRUSTEE
Party 2: FANNING TIMOTHY P
FANNING JULIE ELIZABETH
WEYBRIDGE WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
WEYBRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
STRATHMORE GATE WEST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
DOE JOHN
DOE JANE
Legal: 27 43 41 POR ACRE

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 08:48:29

Interesting … I bought my shirts at Kohls, and I went late in the day. The shelves were well stocked and the store was definitely unbusy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 11:19:36

Everybody I’ve talked to say that once the riot/brawl for the loss leader specials ended, everybody left…….well before noon.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 11:36:11

I think Kohl’s loss leader was some cheapo Android tablet or something. Like I want a useless toy like that.

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:09:00

Standing in line… is fun?

We are SO forked.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 10:30:26

Under “Hobbies”, I’ve seen people list “shopping”. That always amazed me.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 11:36:48

Under “Hobbies”, I’ve seen people list “shopping”. That always amazed me.

Was at a party this weekend, and a friend was describing the shopping behavior of his Malaysian (I believe) wife.

His wife, her sister, and a friend (I may be mis-recollecting) would go on shopping “vacations”. On day one they would do recon - walk around, make notes, and in the evening compare prices to figure out what the best deals. I’m not sure what day 2 was. Day 3 they’d go buy the things they had come for, but it’d only be a few items.

I just can’t relate to that…at all.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 12:56:51

“I’m not sure what day 2 was.”

Frontal lobotomy?

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2011-11-29 16:41:08

I’d rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-11-29 17:07:17

“Under “Hobbies”, I’ve seen people list “shopping”. That always amazed me.”

You and me both. On the other hand, it is a handy descriptor for weeding out potential mates.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2011-11-29 17:11:29

And I see her response of “just” being there to have fun as a nervous, caught-off-guard, nonsense response. She knows how ridiculous it is for her to be there and needs to pretend to make fun of herself. Reality is she is there to shop just like everyone else.

 
 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 10:33:16

“Hundreds line up in darkness, chill to save cold cash at Kohl’s in Boynton on Black Friday”

Until people figure out that when they are “saving cash” in this consumptive manner they are merely spending less than they otherwise would have, the lesson will not end.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 11:37:51

Until people figure out that when they are “saving cash” in this consumptive manner they are merely spending less than they otherwise would have, the lesson will not end.

Hah, and then maybe our politicians can’t get away with considering the same type of behavior “spending cuts”/”budget cuts”

 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 07:45:19

(So Ca)Last night I met a deadbeat at Costco who told me it was a business decision not to pay her mortgage. Meanwhile, I was buying lean proteins and she was buying Christmas presents. It must be nice to have a raise in your disposable income. Pretty affluent area, btw.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-11-29 07:57:20

I talked about a couple a few weeks ago that was trying to sell their home first but was considering BK. They met w/their lawyer and last month skipped their first payment. They make $170k between them. Their home is only worth a bit more than that one year income. I did mention their biggest pressure in their financial world was probably their education debt. That and keeping up w/the local “Joneses” families.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2011-11-29 08:35:49

Carrie:

I wonder how many deadbeats stood in line on black friday?

Are they the only reason the economy is still being propped up?

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 08:51:21

Just remember, they will eventually get kicked out, have ruined credit and will probably end up renting an apartment.

These people are going to have a blast with all their toys when the sheriff eventually shows up and kicks them out.

But as I’ve said before, this is the bank’s fault. If foreclosures and evictiones were swift there would be no “deadbeats”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 09:07:24

“But as I’ve said before, this is the bank’s fault.”

Who has allowed the banks to allow the Deadbeats to stay in “their” homes? Did the banksters do it all on their own or do they have an accomplice? I agree that the banksters are scum and the Deadbeats are, well they are deadbeats. But we are missing one more layer of pond scum here. I think it begins with a G. After we find that word we may have to look for an R and D.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 09:55:01

“Who has allowed the banks to allow the Deadbeats to stay in “their” homes? ”

FASB?

wikipedia
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a private, not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States in the public’s interest. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) designated the FASB as the organization responsible for setting accounting standards for public companies in the U.S

In June 2009, FASB was criticized by an advisory panel of investors after making changes on mark-to-market accounting in response to political pressure. Lobbyists had obtained its permission for banks to apply a special accounting treatment for toxic assets.[5]

 
Comment by polly
2011-11-29 10:57:34

Hw many times do we have to repeat it. The banks don’t own those loans. They are the servicers. They follow the rules set out in the servicing agreement. They have no reason to accelerate the foreclosure because that will eventually end the stream of payments they get for being the servicer of record for the loan. It will happen. Slowly. But don’t expect it to be quick. Not unless someone arranges for them to get paid more to be quick than to be slow.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 14:43:19

Someone is making the decision to not foreclose, and it’s definitely not the “deadbeat”.

 
 
 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2011-11-29 08:30:29

(I do know a few who have been foreclosed and evicted).
Well, there you have it. you DO know some deadbeats. they’ve already been thrown out. did you ask them how long they got to stay in “their” house before the bank took possession for non-payment? A year? two years?
you probably know a few more living in your own neighborhood.
look to see who is doing unusually well by their buying habits. New car? New toys? A grand or 2 a month in “new net income” can change a persons lifestyle overnight.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 08:58:15

It was typically 6 months, they were unemployed and scrambling to find a new job. They weren’t living it up.

What is interesting is that their now empty houses are not for sale. I see them dark and empty when I walk the dog. But yeah, from what I’ve heard out here foreclosures in my part of the world are pretty quick.

As for new cars … I don’t know anyone who has bought one lately. The nightly walk with the dog shows a dearth of the ubiquitous “new car” tags. It was rathe rdifferent 5 years ago.

Look, I’m not saying it doesn’t happen in your neck of the woods, all I’m saying is that unlike some of you I have yet to meet someone who is living “rent free.”, and by that I mean people who chose to nopt pay the mortgage, as opposed to not paying becauase they are broke and unemployed. People don’t talk about it out here. I go to parties and I don’t hear a peep about it. I don’t meet strangers who brag to me in CostCo about not paying.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-11-29 09:08:56

I know someone who hasn’t made a mortgage payment in quite a while…it’s turned into years. They assumed it wouldn’t go on this long but plan to stay until told to leave. They stretched really hard to buy at the peak (they had bad credit and therefore paid a high interest rate) and were told that in a couple of years they could refi down to a competitive rate. When that time came the bubble was bursting and nobody would refi them at a lower rate. They said “screw it”. They’ve been offered a couple of different workouts to get current again, but in each case it was simply the bank trying to suck more money out of them but reserving the right to take the house back at any time if the market went back up.

I know someone else who is upside down and thinking hard about doing the same thing.

I know others I suspect are in the same boat but don’t actually know the facts about them.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 11:40:37

As for new cars … I don’t know anyone who has bought one lately.

I bought one, but it was a better deal (and basically same price) as buying used, and I paid cash.

Sadly I don’t get to live rent-free, so instead my savings took a hit. But I’ve been disciplined and have savings, and am slowly replacing what I spent earlier this year.

 
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 08:57:45

“but no one who is living rent free (I do know a few who have been foreclosed and evicted).”

Before they got foreclosed and evicted, were you aware that they were living rent-free?

I’m guessing that you know more than you suspect; you just won’t know they were until after things become public-record.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 09:03:05

As my kids would say … duh!

What I’m saying is that they are getting evicted after 6 months or so. And in their case it wasn’t a “strategic default”.

Has it not ocurred to some of you that many are being foreclosed because they don’t have any income, and not because they chose to buy a luxury car instead of paying the mortgage?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Awaiting
2011-11-29 09:19:07

In Colorado
The deadbeats who have fallen on hard times aren’t really deadbeats. It’s the ones that made it a business decision, I have absolutely no respect for. Those gaming the system are scum. The people hurting, I feel for.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 09:26:48

“What I’m saying is that they are getting evicted after 6 months or so. And in their case it wasn’t a “strategic default”.

It must be different there and I am not saying that as a smart @ss. Because they are evrywhere around here, some poor, some middle class and some rich or posing as being rich and they have not paid in many cases for years. But as you say the bank or Fannie or whoever does not kick them out. One of the many things that bothers me about the DBs is the longer it goes the more they feel they are entitled to live in “their” house for free. I know about the Robo signing but they speak and act as if that is a General Absolution from ALL of their sins.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-11-29 09:29:11

many are being foreclosed because they don’t have any income, and not because they chose to buy a luxury car instead of paying the mortgage

And statistically, there are just not that many “deadbeats”.

About 33% of Americans own their home outright, 33% of Americans are renters and most people’s mortgage is under control. I don’t thing there is any way that the “deadbeats” statistically affected Black Friday. Do any of you?

About a third of all houses in the US are owned free and clear with no mortgage. Of the two-thirds that are mortgaged, the median mortgage is $101,000, 55% of the value of the house. investing.calsci dot com

one can conclude that the average American resides in his or her own home, pays roughly $1,000 per month in mortgage payments for a three or less bedroom house with no more than one occupant per room.[27] wiki

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 10:14:23

To the extent that people in your area are not paying their mortgages but are out spending their extra money, they are actually stimulating your local economy, and therefore probably helping you financially.

You should thank them. They’ll get theirs in the end, and in the meantime their spending will help you through the depression.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 10:15:21

“About 33% of Americans own their home outright, 33% of Americans are renters and most people’s mortgage is under control. ”

So why is there such a huge shadow inventory? The former houses of the 33% renters? And if so many mortgages are under control, then we can’t expect house prices to drop much more…

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 10:36:37

It’s all relative.

There are about 130 million housing units in the US. 33% of that is 43 million (give or take).

There are about 6 million loans in default or in the foreclosure pipeline. There is also plenty on the books of investors/banks/Fannie/Freddie, etc.

From the FDIC, this totals about $12B of residential (how many homes is this? At a value of $125k apiece, this is about 100k homes on the books of FDIC insured institutions.

Let’s say a high estimate of REO and mortgages in trouble is 9 million. Pick a different number if you have a better feel for it.

That’s 9 million units out of 130 million units. Or 9 of 43 million (which is a huge percentage)

Normally, even in good times, there would be likely 2.5 million homes with mortgages in some stage of delinquency and foreclosure and another several hundred thousand owned by financial institutions. So, let’s say that “normal” is 3 million of 43 million.

With my estimate, that means 6 million of excess to burn off through:

Short sale
Foreclosure
Loan restructurings (which have been more successful–meaning fewer redefaults)
Miracle self-cures (which do happen)

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 11:02:17

So why is there such a huge shadow inventory? The former houses of the 33% renters?

Here in Tucson, I would venture to guess that a good bit of the shadow inventory is rental property. As in, houses that were bought as investments that were supposed to appreciate to the sky. While said appreciation was being hoped for, the houses were rented out.

Well, you know tenants. Many of them aren’t very kind to rental houses. Which put another crimp in the specu-vestors’ plans. So, they’ve been letting those houses go back to the bank.

These days, they’re just sitting there, not for sale. And they’re very unoccupied. In many locations, they’re being vandalized.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 11:16:31

“What I’m saying is that they are getting evicted after 6 months or so. And in their case it wasn’t a “strategic default”.

Interesting. I know a couple myself that are strategic.

“Has it not ocurred to some of you that many are being foreclosed because they don’t have any income, and not because they chose to buy a luxury car instead of paying the mortgage?”

It definitely is something that I am well aware of. There are real victims in this downturn, who did not buy above their means, and yet were impacted on the earnings side by the downturn. I feel for them.

Actually, I do not judge even the strategic defaulters; they are making a smart business decision. And it’s not like the concept of strategic default is new. The banks have been aware of it for a LONG time, and their knowledge of it should have served to prevent them from taking part in the bubble. But they put their heads in the same.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 11:18:26

s/same/sand/.

I can’t type today. :-(

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 11:21:31

It must be different there and I am not saying that as a smart @ss.

Or maybe its different where you are. You guys make it sound like every other house has a deadbeat in it, buying luxury cars (if they really are, then why are car sales still in the tank?) buying goodies left and right (while retail sales and sales tax collections are still below historical averages) with the mortgage payment money.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 11:40:52

“You guys make it sound like every other house has a deadbeat in it, buying luxury cars…buying goodies left and right ”

aka pumping the propaganda

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 13:12:14

CO, the data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis shows that there has been negative mortgage equity withdrawal over the past couple of years (meaning people are putting money into their homes, not taking it out). I don’t know how they count reduction in debt due to default in this mix, but there is a growing amount of data that household balance sheets are looking better.

The Fed is showing that household net worth is now rising again (and has been for a bit).

And the third leg…regardless of actual levels of debt, the cost to service that debt for consumers is going down. The Fed shows that the “Financial Obligation Ratio” is at levels last seen in the mid-90’s.

My parents are a good example. They have one mortgage on a vacation home that has been in our family since the 60’s. The mortgage is less than a third of value, and they are considering refinancing and dropping the rate by 1%…no cash out. They are focused on paying the sucker off, but if they weren’t, the amount of money they can spend would go up by more than $100 per month.

Taking the low rates that the Fed is giving us and refinancing mortgage debt is like giving yourself a raise (in some cases a big one). While wages are stagnant, a ton of people have more money in their pockets each and every month.

If austerity isn’t forced onto Americans, Americans will spend. The challenge for the Fed is that a lot of their “temporary QE” is resulting in PERMANENT increases in available cash for consumers…how they take away the punchbowl to stop inflation is anyone’s guess…

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 13:47:15

Taking the low rates that the Fed is giving us and refinancing mortgage debt is like giving yourself a raise (in some cases a big one). While wages are stagnant, a ton of people have more money in their pockets each and every month.

This is only true for debtors, though. For savers, well….we’re getting screwed.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 14:18:18

Absolutely true drumminj.

Even for us savers though, having financially healthy debtors is better than financially sick debtors.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 14:49:46

If austerity isn’t forced onto Americans, Americans will spend.

Hmmmm…

Median household income has dropped over 10% in my county during the past 10 years. Factor in inflation and the real number is close to 30%.

I can get into just about any restaurant on a Friday or Saturday night with little or no wait.

Several car dealerships in my county have gone out of business.

That sounds like austerity to me.

I think the BF sales stats are BS, meant to make “the consumer” feel more “confident”.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 15:20:01

I can tell you there is no such forced austerity in the fantasyland of Silicon Valley (and it’s going to get worse now that LinkedIn employees can sell, and worse yet when Facebook goes public).

Ultimately the sales this holiday season will be known when retailers report profits in January. Until then it’s a guessing game.

Based on better looking household balance sheets and debt service requirements, it is certainly possible that consumption is up…and given the continued poor employment picture, possible that the books are cooked.

As an aside, I heard some positive commentary relating to jobs in Northern NV recently–that temp firms are booming…a precursor to permanent positions.

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 16:35:03

I can tell you there is no such forced austerity in the fantasyland of Silicon Valley

Not apparent on the east side of Seattle, either. Restaurants seem full whenever I go out (granted I go to the ‘good’ restaurants, not Applebee’s). Malls seemed packed this past weekend.

But this is tech country, and so far the tech industry has held up.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by polly
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 06:52:17

PBS covered this last night (dang, they cover everything!)

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec11/citigroup_11-28.html

EXCERPTS:

“PBS: Explain the machinery here. Why did Judge Rakoff have to sign off on this deal in the first place once it was negotiated between the erring bank and a regulator?

EDWARD WYATT, The New York Times: Well, the SEC brought the case in federal district court. And it was asking for an injunction which would prevent Citigroup from violating the securities laws again. And because of that and because its’ a federal agency, they had to get the judge’s approval for the decision..

…JACOB FRENKEL, former Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement lawyer: What I really saw was Judge Rakoff saying to the SEC and really to Citigroup as well, you didn’t tell me, the judge, enough for me to be able to sign off on the settlement, because this practice of the SEC settling cases without admitting or denying allegations,.

——-

Lots of good stuff in this article. The judge criticized the common practice “neither admitting or denying wrongdoing,” because how can he tell what the public interest is if there isn’t even a clear verdict? Once he get that admission of guilt, the expert he’ll agree with the terms of the settlement.

At the same time, without that “neither admitting or denying” wrongdoing option, banks are less likely to settle. They are more likely to continue their wrongdoing, knowing they can delay any prosecutions by outspending and overwhelming the understaffed court system.

(I suppose we could solve all this with a “regulation holiday.” :roll: )

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 12:07:32

The “neither admitting nor denying” disclaimer makes it harder to file a civil suit.

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:19:58

It’s about damn time somebody kicked the SEC’s butt up around their heads.

Every damn watchdog agency has been gutted over the last 20 years and this needs to change.

Never forget that “less government” is code for “free to eff you over.”

Without rules and regulations, the invisible hand of the free market always ends up your rectum.

Comment by polly
2011-11-29 11:09:09

They are going to need a lot more people and therefore a lot more money if they are going to start providing factual records that private individuals can use to sue the issuers of securities for fraud. Lots and lots more people. And it is almost impossible for the owners of those securities to start the proceess themselves. Early on they have very little information about what happened. I’ve said here before that I think it could happen, but it is hard. Much easier for the regulator who has the actual skill set to establish the basic facts of the case.

Regulators are staffed for normal times, not crisis mode. And the SEC is understaffed even for normal times.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 15:52:18

This is one area of government that I would really like to see fully-funded in normal times, and have available whatever budget they need to go after the evil-doers who caused a financial crisis.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 05:58:34

American Airlines to declare bankruptcy, check any online source.

Airlines are notorious for going BK just to shove pensions off on the taxpayer. Is this one for real, or are they just crying wolf again?

Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 06:03:13

So, what should we expect to see from this? Ticket prices going up maybe?

A deflationary event - a bankruptcy - leading to higher prices?

Comment by BlueStar
2011-11-29 06:52:29

I was struck by the fact they closed a deal to buy a bunch of Boeing and Airbus planes a few months back. Who in the hell put that financing package together? JP Morgan, Goldman, Ben Bernanke?
You think Boeing is going to take those sales off the books?

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-11-29 07:46:20

It’s Chapter 11. They intend to keep operating after they get rid of current union contracts, pensions and the like.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/american-airlines-parent-files-for-bankruptcy-protection-after-labor-agreements-fail/2011/11/29/gIQALIHd8N_story.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 10:21:13

CRAP
I knew it:

“American was embroiled in negotiations with unions for all of its major work groups as far back as 2006, seeking to boost employee productivity and erase part of what it said was an $800 million labor-cost disadvantage to other carriers.

…American’s pilots, flight attendants, mechanics and baggage handlers wanted to use the contract talks to regain some of the $1.6 billion in annual concessions they gave in 2003 to help the company avoid bankruptcy.

AMR shares have plunged 79 percent this year and analysts including Philip Baggaley of Standard & Poor’s have warned the company could face a cash crisis during the next 12 months without new labor agreements.”

———-

The pilots already gave up over a billion years ago. They wanted to get some back, or at least keep status quo. AA’s response was to abuse the bankruptcy laws stomp the little guy.

*sigh* So paying a living wage is now considered a “cost disadvantage.” Pretty soon the only way to make an acceptable profit will be for all the employees to make minimum wage with no health insurance, no matter how skilled they are.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:21:37

Exactly.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-29 23:30:00

“Exactly.”

Really? Over a billion years ago?

 
 
Comment by Steve J
2011-11-29 10:51:58

The planes were not funded. The deal contained a clause about AA not declaring bankruptcy, so both deals are dead.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 09:07:42

So, what should we expect to see from this? Ticket prices going up maybe?

In the short term, probably nothing.

The BK might allow American to get rid of unpaid/leased aircraft they no longer need, which would result in lower capacity.

I don’t fly a lot, but when I do the planes are always packed.

Comment by Steve J
2011-11-29 10:54:30

Ticket prices normally go down and mileage bonuses go up to entice fliers onto a bankrupt airline.

Citi may now own AAdvantage.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 06:45:59

Airlines are notorious for going BK just to shove pensions off on the taxpayer.

Yes. Another way to socialize costs. But I can hear the dimwits now… it goes something like:

uhhhh ummm… gee… What’s wrong with thaaaaaaaaaaat? They’re ‘nice guys’ golldarnit it, and we might fly on a airplane sum day.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:24:01

After all, it’s the unions’ fault anyway. (even though AA unions have been giving serious wage compromises and concessions for the last 20 years)

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 10:51:23

Of course it’s the union goons fault. It’s never about the guys at the top robbing the company blind.

Put a few of these mofo’s in jail and see how quickly things change.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2011-11-29 08:43:56

They just want to be like the rest of the kids on the block.

Nice timing too, plenty of media opps to put images of stranded kiddies en route to grandma’s into the peeps’ minds. Ya know, grease the skids for a little lovin’ from Uncle Sugar.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-11-29 09:41:26

Expect air travel to get more expensive and worse. The golden age for passengers is over.

AA was the last carrier with excess labor costs; they’ve been slashed to rock bottom levels elsewhere. Energy is unlikely to get cheaper.

Now imagine what happens if investors actually demand to make money rather than subsidizing the airlines with serial losses?

 
 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-11-29 06:23:26

How does BK shove pensions off on the taxpayer?

Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 06:25:44

Via the PBIC.

Comment by rms
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-11-29 09:25:33

With these additional obligations, PBGC’s total obligations rose to nearly $107 billion. Although our investment assets increased as well, overall our net deficit rose from $23 billion at the end of FY 2010 to $26 billion this fiscal year.

We are so screwed!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:25:12

Now yer gettin’ it.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 10:30:27

“deficit rose from $23 billion at the end of FY 2010 to $26 billion this fiscal year. ”

That’s about 2 month’s cost of the war in Iraq.

 
 
 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2011-11-29 08:41:24

Be more specific: Pension Benefit Insurance Corp.?
I think it is actually Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp…….another ingenious idea of CONgress to pay the pensions of Companies who failed to fully fund the pensions they offered their employees.
Since we don’t have consistent 8%-10% growth into eternity, which was them metric “financial planners” used to base the pension income upon, they are mostly “underfunded”.
Expect more to collapse.
One good thing, they DON”T pay out the full amount of the golden pensions. If you got your 20, or got your 30, and the business collapses, they will look at your AGE and adjust the payments down.
Otherwise the PBGC would need perpetual Bailouts from Congress.
I expect they will be at the trough soon, though.

Comment by Jim A
2011-11-29 09:16:08

And of course because the managers of those retirement funds are desperately trying to get the above-market returns mandated, they’re not looking very closely at how risky those investments may be.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2011-11-29 10:57:06

PBGC has caps on how much they will pay out. Pilots will be the big losers and those that retired under 65.

If AMR is successful, the PBGC is allowed to give the pension back.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 11:45:01

Now that they’ve been screwed out of their pensions and insurance, it will be interesting to see how many AA pilots end up staying on, and how many quit to take contract work in China and the Middle East.

Perusing “climbto350″, numerous positions in Asia for Boeing and Airbus captains and First Officers…..of course, being non-USA, they can be as age/gender discriminate as they want. They are looking for the 30-50 year old, with 5000hr TT, 1000-1500 hours in type.

AA will replace them with $30K/year guys with 1500 hours total time, 1100 of which is in a Beech Baron, or some other bug-beater.

The physical infrastructure isn’t the only thing crumbling.

 
Comment by Moman
2011-11-29 15:22:03

The key difference between flying a 777 and a bug beater is staying ahead of the airplane. Flying is stick and rudder, and by some accounts, easier in commercial airliners due to automation. The only thing that concerns me as a passenger is the 1% of the flying time that becomes an “emergency” and the “oh s&&t” moment, where only experience can provide the training to properly and safely assess the situation and get the aircraft back on the ground.

 
Comment by pdmseatac
2011-11-29 18:47:35

“Comment by Moman
2011-11-29 15:22:03
The key difference between flying a 777 and a bug beater is staying ahead of the airplane. Flying is stick and rudder, and by some accounts, easier in commercial airliners due to automation. The only thing that concerns me as a passenger is the 1% of the flying time that becomes an “emergency” and the “oh s&&t” moment, where only experience can provide the training to properly and safely assess the situation and get the aircraft back on the ground.”

The perfect example of this is the Air France flight 447 disaster in the Atlantic.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-29 11:26:56

Keep in mind that these pensions and guarantee funds are required by law to be invested in AAA-rated instruments and you will understand why housing has not been allowed to fall to its market price.

Good to see you again, CT. How the snow pack coming?

Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 11:52:23

and you will understand why housing has not been allowed to fall to its market price.

and why the loss of AAA rating on US Treasuries would be problematic.

 
Comment by CharlieTango
2011-11-29 13:21:32

snow pack is coming slowly

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 06:31:33

Why don`t they skip the middle man and get the money direct from China?

Obama Says U.S. ‘Stands Ready to Do Our Part’ for Eurozone Crisis

Nov 28, 2011 6:25pmObama

As the European debt crisis continues to escalate, President Obama urged European Union leaders today to act quickly to resolve the eurozone crisis, saying that “the United States stands ready to do our part to help them resolve this issue.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/obama-says-u-s-stands-ready-to-do-our-part-for-eurozone-crisis/ -

Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 06:37:58

“… act quickly to resolve the debt crisis …”

“Resolve”: I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

Comment by Ben Jones
2011-11-29 08:16:56

http://finance.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON (AP) — Europe’s deepening debt crisis is echoed in the United States by the inability of President Barack Obama and Congress to strike a bipartisan deficit deal. On both sides of the Atlantic, leaders are having a hard time making tough, unpopular decisions. And things come together only at the very last minute, if at all, while the global economy hangs in the balance.’

‘European Council President Herman Van Rompuy said eurozone nations have already done a lot to tackle the crisis with measures that “would have been unthinkable” a year ago. “But we have to do more.”

Unthinkable, as in forcing Goldman Sachs cronies on sovereign countries with no vote? BTW, GS was instrumental in getting Greece into the EU by helping them hide debt. Everyone involved knew this was happening. A few years pass and now a GS person is running the country. “We have to do more…”

‘And one top Democratic lawmaker even suggested that “the public cannot be totally absolved of responsibility.” “They elected us,” Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., senior Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee said at a news conference Monday called to announce his retirement after more than three decades. “Congress is not some autonomous entity that parachuted through the dome,” Frank said. “We were elected.”

Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Fl)
2011-11-29 08:47:34

Frank. What a notorious liar and loser. He promoted the housing boom, then denied he had anything to do with it. When I hear his “you elected us” ( i didn’t and never would) I hear the sounds of the Who singing Baba O’reilly……………Meet the new boss, same as the old boss……………….we won’t get fooled again!!!!
I know we will.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:28:36

Not to defend Frank,m but it wasn’t him who authored the Commondities Modernizaitona Act and repealed Glass Steagal.

As for subprime defualts, you do know that prime defaults took the lead earlier this year, right.

Prime.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 10:41:37

“Prime.”

You range?

No worries—it’s all contained.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 11:22:27

s/range/rang/.

Wow, I _really_ can’t type today!

Apparently I can’t proofread either. :-(

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-11-29 08:53:55

Yes, the public wanted something for nothing — more tax cuts, more senior health care spending, etc. — and Frank’s generation of members of Congress delivered. And was re-elected.

Now it’s time to pay the bill, and no one is happy.

Were people fooled? Should they have known there would be a reckoning? Or did they just not care? Take a look and consumer debt levels to see the answer.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2011-11-29 09:16:50

‘the public wanted something for nothing’

I hear what you’re saying and agree. But let’s not forget that even today there are those who insist that cutting spending/borrowing is not the thing to do in a recession. I asked a while back why was it that the EU was imposing austerity and the US was passing stimulus programs. Does Keynesian policy only work for the US?

 
Comment by Jim A
2011-11-29 09:18:19

Yeah, tell people that your plan is to raise their taxes and cut their benefits and their pork barrel projects. That platform is SURE to get you elected. /sarcasm voice.

 
Comment by Montana
2011-11-29 10:16:44

weird situation to be in, to decry the goodies voted in by Congress, but vilify those who even suggest cutting them back. I can’t say for sure that it’s the same people, but I am definitely getting mixed messages somehow.

I guess that’s how the Euros got in the mess they’re in.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 10:44:04

“why was it that the EU was imposing austerity and the US was passing stimulus programs. Does Keynesian policy only work for the US?”

I guess we’re about to see if austerity programs during depressions work well, thanks to Europe’s experiments with them.

I’m not sure we’ve had Keynesian stimulus here yet, except maybe the payroll tax break. Most stimulus has been monetarist, ie flushing the financial system with cash at super-low rates.

But I agree we’ve not had the austerity measures that are being forced on the PIGS by the banksters, so there will be some room for comparison of austerity vs. stimulus.

 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 10:51:24

1. The total gov stimulus in the US is miniscule when you add in the collapse of State and Local Spending.
2. Bailing out banks who then sit on the money is not stimulus.
3. The people didn’t vote for invading Iraq, and even if they did they were lied to, they didn’t vote for TARP, the repeal of glass steagle, they didn’t vote for a Medicare prescription drug law that prevents Medicare from bargaining for cheaper drugs and thus paying 60% more than the VA, they didn’t vote for alot of the stuff gov does, and even when they try to vote in someone new they find that that person is also beholden to the elite of the country at everyone elses expense.
4. Give the EU time, I still expect a wall of money once Germany and Bankers get’s what they want. I’m not sure it will help as I think the bankers think they can stimulate the country by concentrating the wealth so the wall of money will not end up in the hands of hte many.

 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 12:23:00

Note
From 2008 to 2010 States saw a 200 billion drop in income. Cities and municipalities suffered as well. Factor state and local job cuts, increased fees, and decreased services and this took a big bite out of total gov spending.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2011-11-29 06:45:55

In case anyone missed this expose on how executive pay is set, it is just how public employee unions and the politicians they control set pension levels. Anyone want to call this the free market?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/cozy-relationships-and-peer-benchmarking-send-ceos-pay-soaring/2011/09/22/gIQAgq8NJL_story_1.html

“This is how it’s done in corporate America. At Amgen and at the vast majority of large U.S. companies, boards aim to pay their executives at levels equal to or above the median for executives at similar companies.”

“The idea behind setting executive pay this way, known as “peer benchmarking,” is to keep talented bosses from leaving.
But the practice has long been controversial because, as critics have pointed out, if every company tries to keep up with or exceed the median pay for executives, executive compensation will spiral upward, regardless of performance. Few if any corporate boards consider their executive teams to be below average, so the result has become known as the “Lake Wobegon” effect.”

“The practice has persisted because corporate board members, many of whom have personal or business relationships with the chief executive, have been unwilling to abandon the practice.”

“These kinds of ties — between chief executives and the boards that oversee them — permeate corporate America. On a typical board, the chief executive considers about about 33 percent of the board of directors as “friends” rather than as mere “acquaintances,”according to a survey of chief executives at about 350 S&P 1500 corporations conducted over 15 years by University of Michigan business professor James Westphal.
More tellingly, the chief executive is likely to find even more friends on the compensation committees of corporate boards — almost 50 percent.”

Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 07:10:39

Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%…

Compare ratio of median average worker bee to CEO in Amerikwa forty years ago to today, or that same ratio in Germany today.

 
Comment by oxide
2011-11-29 07:34:54

Yes, they don’t really “need” the money, and their pay doesn’t have much relation to the actual work they do. They just get paid that much so that they can SAY they get paid that much. They just want a “46″ in front of their 000,000 instead of a “29.”

To them, that’s a $17,000,000 ego stroke. To the 99%, that $17M is ~300 good bennie jobs.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-11-29 09:51:16

regardle(-$$) of performance.

regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.
regardle(-$$) of performance.

Don’t!…Stop!…hiring…’em!
Don’t!…Stop!…hiring…’em!
Don’t!…Stop!…hiring…’em!
Don’t!…Stop!…hiring…’em!
Don’t!…Stop!…hiring…’em!

:-)

Comment by alpha-sloth
2011-11-29 10:46:11

and patterns of behavior

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:32:19

Oh it’s even worse. They are also board memeber of multiple corproations simultaneously.

In other words, they control not just one compnay, but often dozens.

Isn’t communist capitalism great!

Comment by WT Economist
2011-11-29 11:28:16

You should see the comments on the article — by business people who actually started companies. Don’t invest of businesses you don’t own yourselves these days.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 12:32:08

Whoa. The 99% are NOT happy campers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 13:04:04

Don’t invest of businesses you don’t own yourselves these days.

My sentiments exactly!

 
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 12:25:29

I’d love to see a comparison of pay packages of private companies vs public companies. My guess is that in private you have very few golden parachutes and more/better performance pay that is tied to long term results.

Comment by WT Economist
2011-11-29 12:58:23

Are you talking about companies that are still owned mostly by their founders? Or companies taken private by private equity guys.

In the former case, it makes no sense for someone such as Bloomberg of Bloomberg LLC to overpay himself or his replacement CEO, since he would be ripping himself off.

In the latter case, the game was to buy companies with lots of debts and resell to greater fools at a higher price in the public market. My guess is a lot of executive compensation is tied to that later sale, which may not happen as greater fools are shrinking in supply.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2011-11-29 14:03:08

In case anyone missed this expose on how executive pay is set, it is just how public employee unions and the politicians they control set pension levels. Anyone want to call this the free market?”

Who cares about shareholder’s anyway ? or taxpayers ?

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-11-29 07:56:38

A recent foreclosure notice in the local fishwrap got my attention because the house is in our ‘hood. This one was NOT one of those new construction failed flips. County records show the couple bought the house in 1991 and did not take out a mortgage. However, in 2005 they took out some kind of HELOC for an amount that was 50% higher than their original purchase price. OK class, what happened in 2005 and what might they have done with the money? Anyone? Buehler?

Now, six years later they’re being foreclosed. Given that this is a mostly retiree community, they gotta be in their 80’s now.

Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 08:08:37

“OK class, what happened in 2005 and what might they have done with the money? Anyone? Buehler?”

Obviously someone broke into their home and forced them at gunpoint to do a cash out refi and probably told them if they didn`t blow the money they would never see their granchildren again.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-11-29 08:13:19

If they’re in their 80s, maybe they were paying off a medical bill and kept the house.

That’s one thing years on HBB has done for me too. I see a listing and wonder about the story behind it. Our towns are small. Lots of times w/in a 3-4 town radius I do eventually find out. I don’t know the story on this one however.

Empty, well located w/in walking distance to the tennis club, the town beach/park, restaurants w/outdoor service and entertainment and the rest of the village, this listing is very underpriced. A whiff of trouble in dreamland?

http://cnyhomes.com/Listing/Search/info.cgi?mlnum=S252948

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-11-29 09:20:34

“If they’re in their 80s, maybe they were paying off a medical bill and kept the house.”

Medicare hasn’t really started rationing care yet so I doubt that’s the case. Especially given the size of that HELOC.

BTW, seniors who are wealthy, and even those who just have a comfortable retirement, pay way too little for their Medicare coverage, to the detriment of their kids and grandkids. Thanks a lot, AARP. That’s one of the reasons I convinced my wife to not renew when her membership expired. I was never a member.

Comment by Montana
2011-11-29 10:20:06

Yeah I can’t believe they wouldn’t have had both Medicare and a medigap policy, plus the prescription drug benefit. When my father went through all his health problems, there was a mess of paperwork but basically it was bills for one service then the EOB’s from the insurance companies, and he didn’t pay anything.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CincyDad
2011-11-29 10:43:31

CarrieAnne,

Yes, Caz is a nice little village to live in. Always loved going over there for dinner or what-ever.

However, jobs in CNY keep drying up. NPG is about to close for good, right? There are still some decent paying jobs in the area, and some better paying corporate execs around, but the number has not grown over the past 2 decades.

How many people are left in greater Syracuse who can afford a $499,000 house, $14,600 annual tax bill, very high heating bills ($12k/yr on that place?), and $$$$ annual mantainance on any sizeable property in CNY? What would it cost to replace that roof, something that needs to be done more often in CNY than elsewhere?

Given the stagnate/ declining employment picture of Syracuse, how can you claim the house is under-priced? A couple would need to earn well north of $200k/year to afford that place in Cazanovia. How many jobs in CNY pay more than $80k/yr?

I live in SW Ohio, north of Cincinnati. I have almost that much land (and a barn for horses if I wanted them), my house is almost as old, but admittedly, it’s only 4bd, not 5. It cost about half of what that house costs, my taxes are 1/4 that annually, my heating bills are trivial comparred to that house (I have 2 geothermal units for my house), and yes, I have some maintenance to do, but all hsitoric 19th century houses require lots of maintenance.

Your perpective on what is “underprice” is simply mind-boggeling to 80% of the people in this country.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2011-11-29 17:49:30

Very simply almost everything around here w/the exception of Syracuse itself seems to be slapped w/a price tag of $100/sq foot. That’s a 5700 sq foot home on over 4 acres walking distance to the lake.

And I’m really so confused why you keep saying there’s no money around Syracuse. What do you think Coach Boeheim is paid? Or for that matter Nancy Cantor? What do you think the specialty surgeons in the expanding hospitals are paid? Or the oncologists? I have acquaintences who were here helping w/fracking contracts in the general area who sold a home worth more than that and went and bought another in TX for just below a million. You keep looking at what the worker bees make but where do you think the owners of the local news organization lives, or the dual doctor couples or the commercial developers. (Yup met one of those retired brain surgeons that moved here cuz it was a good place for his son he had late w/his trophy wife to play lacrosse. She worked as a Dr. at University Hospital). I didn’t even get into the old manufacturing wealth still kicking around here or the retired brokers. (Did you really think they just stayed in Manhattan or CT for the rest of their lives?)

Your comment that 80% of the people in this country would think a $500k home doesn’t ring true to a person who watched Boston inflate. In the neighborhoods I frequented even now my friends are looking at prices like this for a 2500 sq footer in an aging tightly developed neighborhood, not a 5700 sq footer by the lake. Everything’s relative to the experience.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muggy
2011-11-29 20:20:22

There are plenty of millionaires in that area, I agree.

I still can’t get over how many seasonal residents Skan has. It’s NOT cheap.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-11-29 21:10:27

Not meaning to pile on but I’ve made the same point before Carrie. This notion that anything is underpriced in Syracuse is baffling to me too.

 
 
 
Comment by jane
2011-11-29 21:31:22

They couldn’t pay their property taxes, is my guess.

 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-30 00:00:36

That’s a very appealing house, CarrieAnn, in what sounds like a wonderful neighborhood. A similar place in a similar neighborhood in CA would be in the low-to-mid-seven figures– at least. That’s literally a 1984 price it’s sporting.

There is definitely a story in THAT one….

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 10:05:43

Just up the street is an empty house. I think it was rented, because the people living there vanished at the end of July.

A search of the county assessor records shows some sort of warranty deed taken against the property about four years after it was purchased. I suspect a refi.

Now that the property’s empty, it’s being cleaned up, but at a very leisurely pace. And there’s a dog in the back yard that’s recently bitten someone. There was an animal control investigation notice posted on the front door earlier this month. Among other things, it said that the dog appeared to be abandoned (since it’s on a property where no one’s living) and that animal control was about to impound it.

That brought a couple of gals to the house a few days later. I walked by while they were having a very heated exchange with an animal control officer.

The dog’s still there, and there’s a handwritten screed on the gate saying that the dog is NOT abandoned, that it is an OUTDOOR dog, and a few other things. I didn’t care to linger long enough to read the whole thing. I don’t know how strong the back yard gate is, and I don’t want to be that dog’s next victim.

But my question is: Why would someone leave a dog at an unoccupied property? That isn’t what I would call being kind to animals.

Comment by stewie
2011-11-29 13:44:33

They’re probably inFESTors and the dog is guarding their “investment.” You know, from the real scum of society, the squating homeless.

sarc off.

Seriously, these people have no problems with screwing over their fellow Americans, why would they care about an animal?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 13:51:36

I’m tempted to put a report in with the local crime-stoppers hotline. House has an alley behind it, which is just perfect for off-loading stolen property without anyone seeing anything from the street. As long as the dog knows who the off-loaders are, no problem.

Methinks it bit someone else. And, maybe just maybe, that someone else is filing suit against the owner of the property.

That might be part of the reason why those two gals were so huffy with the animal control officer. Facing a personal injury lawsuit doesn’t exactly put one in a good mood.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 14:57:40

They’re probably inFESTors and the dog is guarding their “investment.” You know, from the real scum of society, the squating homeless.

That is easy to deal with.

1) Bring a rabbit.
2) Open gate, dog comes out
3) Toss rabbit in front of dog (a cat will also work)
4) Rabbit takes off, dog chases it.

Problem solved!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2011-11-29 12:43:06

“However, in 2005 they took out some kind of HELOC for an amount that was 50% higher than their original purchase price. OK class, what happened in 2005 and what might they have done with the money? Anyone? Buehler?”

They sold their house to the bank at the top of the bubble. Older, wiser!

 
 
Comment by rms
2011-11-29 08:35:20

Bond Dealers See Fed Buying $545 Billion
of Home-Loan Debt in Third Easing
http://tinyurl.com/ce6ffhy (Bloomberg)

“The biggest bond dealers in the U.S. say the Federal Reserve is poised to start a new round of stimulus, injecting more money into the economy by purchasing mortgage securities instead of Treasuries.”

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 09:10:29

Rat b@s7@rds.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 10:34:33

I’ve seen alcoholics with more self-control.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-29 11:37:22

Jif Creamy Peanut Butter Spread
$44.29
Size/Count 18.0 oz.

No refrigeration required
#1 choice of choosy moms
Contains no preservatives

Hellmann’s Mayonnaise
$64.49
Size/Count 22.0 oz.

Double whisked for great taste
Naturally rich in omega 3

http://webpickup.walgreens.com/reviews/wrapper.jsp

 
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 11:58:39

y purchasing mortgage securities instead of Treasuries.

how will the Treasury fund all the US spending then????

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-11-29 16:21:28

Add buying up toxic-waste mortgages to the Fed’s endless bailouts of its bankster accomplices.

The list of institutions that received the most money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 131 of the GAO Audit and are as follows..

Citigroup: $2.5 trillion ($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Sterns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)
and many many more including banks in Belgium of all places

View the 266-page GAO audit of the Federal Reserve(July 21st, 2011):http://www.scribd.com/doc/60553686/GAO-Fed-Investigation

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2011-11-29 09:07:57

Case-Schiller numbers for September are now out. MOM prices dropped in 17 of 20 cities. The three that didn’t drop, or rose, were New York, Portland OR, and, wait for it… Washington, D.C.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 09:17:03


Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk VA

2011-11-28 13:23:04

[...]

Now I’m ready to downsize again. I own a Cray “supercomputer” and it’s really heavy, there is no way to move it to my apartment. I probably should sell it, I’ve almost got it working. It’s so heavy. But there are only like 5 in the wild of my model that I know of.

Wow, that is a SERIOUS geek-collector’s item, Va Beyatch! My hat is off to you.

Of all the geek-cred toys, that one by far takes the cake from any that I have heard of.

What model # is it, btw? I did a bit of work on a Y-MP back in the day, but I’m guessing that yours is one of the older models.

Wow.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-11-29 10:00:07

Talk about a hummer of a carbon footprint! :-)

Comment by redrum
2011-11-29 10:23:19

The ones I used to work on typically needed their own cooling facility.

Comment by Steve J
2011-11-29 13:47:16

Doesn’t the iPhone have the same processing power as an 80’s Cray?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 10:51:19

And now (or soon), the same computing power will be in our pockets…amazing.

Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 11:28:53

And with the Bernanke and lying liar CPI soon it will be cheaper to eat i-Pads than ramen noodles :)

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 13:46:48

It already is…it already is…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 14:09:25

Hmm … does a top of line Pentium have more CPU power than an old Cray?

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 14:20:45

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=42332

Ask Google, and you shall receive.

Looks like the Core 2 Duo beats the Cray-2…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-11-29 09:49:12

U.S. Consumer Confidence Rises Most Since ’03

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-29/u-s-consumer-confidence-rises-by-most-since-april-03-amid-holiday-season.html

Rising consumer confidence may help sustain sales during the holiday shopping season, which accounts for as much as 40 percent of retailers’ annual revenue. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Consumer confidence climbed in November by the most in more than eight years as Americans grew more upbeat about employment and income prospects.

The Conference Board’s index increased to 56 from a revised 40.9 reading in October, the biggest monthly gain since April 2003, figures from the New York-based private research group showed today. The gauge, at a four-month high, exceeded the most-optimistic forecast in a Bloomberg News survey of economists.

Rising sentiment may help sustain sales during the holiday shopping season, which accounts for as much as 40 percent of retailers’ annual revenue. Fewer new claims for jobless benefits and cheaper fuel costs are easing the burden for American consumers, whose spending accounts for about 70 percent of the economy.

“The improvement in the labor market must be offering greater comfort to consumers,” said David Semmens, a U.S. economist at Standard Chartered Bank in London. “This points to a consumer that is feeling more holiday cheer.”

Comment by WT Economist
2011-11-29 11:22:51

Actually, evidence is accumulating that things are starting to get moderately better. We’ll see if it keeps up.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 12:05:24

At least until the next good shock to the system…

 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2011-11-29 09:58:08

It’s good to be a banksta….

How Henry Paulson Gave Hedge Funds Advance Word of 2008 Fannie Mae Rescue

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-29/how-henry-paulson-gave-hedge-funds-advance-word-of-2008-fannie-mae-rescue.html

….Over sandwiches and pasta salad, he delivered that information to a group of men capable of profiting from any disclosure.

Around the conference room table were a dozen or so hedge- fund managers and other Wall Street executives — at least five of them alumni of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), of which Paulson was chief executive officer and chairman from 1999 to 2006….

…After a perfunctory discussion of the market turmoil, the fund manager says, the discussion turned to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Paulson said he had erred by not punishing Bear Stearns shareholders more severely. The secretary, then 62, went on to describe a possible scenario for placing Fannie and Freddie into “conservatorship” — a government seizure designed to allow the firms to continue operations despite heavy losses in the mortgage markets.
Stock Wipeout

Paulson explained that under this scenario, the common stock of the two government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, would be effectively wiped out. So too would the various classes of preferred stock, he said.

The fund manager says he was shocked that Paulson would furnish such specific information — to his mind, leaving little doubt that the Treasury Department would carry out the plan. The managers attending the meeting were thus given a choice opportunity to trade on that information.

…William Black, associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, can’t understand why Paulson felt impelled to share the Treasury Department’s plan with the fund managers.

“You just never ever do that as a government regulator — transmit nonpublic market information to market participants,” says Black, who’s a former general counsel at the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. “There were no legitimate reasons for those disclosures.”

Janet Tavakoli, founder of Chicago-based financial consulting firm Tavakoli Structured Finance Inc., says the meeting fits a pattern.

“What is this but crony capitalism?” she asks. “Most people have had their fill of it.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 11:06:03

…William Black, associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, can’t understand why Paulson felt impelled to share the Treasury Department’s plan with the fund managers.

“You just never ever do that as a government regulator — transmit nonpublic market information to market participants,” says Black, who’s a former general counsel at the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. “There were no legitimate reasons for those disclosures.”

Janet Tavakoli, founder of Chicago-based financial consulting firm Tavakoli Structured Finance Inc., says the meeting fits a pattern.

“What is this but crony capitalism?” she asks. “Most people have had their fill of it.”

And yet, when some of the people start camping in public places and voicing their displeasure about the above, that is bad. Very bad indeed.

Comment by measton
2011-11-29 12:29:53

Yep you get cops and corporate sponsored barking dogs.

Speaking of which were is GEG and 2banana? Disappeared at the same time.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 13:05:19

Yeah, measton, I’ve noticed that too. Seems as though our dynamic duo has taken a powder.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 13:16:30

Or were one and the same person?

Eloped?

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2011-11-30 00:09:19

Think poor Banana/Gag bit off more than he could chew with all the folks here calling him out on his easily refuted talking points.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-11-29 14:48:56

“What is this but crony capitalism?” she asks. “Most people have had their fill of it.”

Wrong. 95% of the zombie sheep known as the US electorate gave their explicit sanction to crony capitalism by voting for its hand-picked political frontmen and enablers, Obama and McCain. While a small minority of intelligent, principled citizens are indeed fed up with crony capitalism and the Wall Street-Federal Reserve Griftopia, the brain-dead mass of Obama and McCain voters, docile and stupid, have signaled the oligarchs that they will pick up the soap on demand.

 
 
Comment by Bub Diddley
2011-11-29 09:58:57

Listen to the comments by the bitter renter they interview. “The furnace breaks - not my problem. The roof needs fixing - not my problem.” And she talks about how she feels she is lucky that she didn’t buy a house, unlike some of her friends:

http://www.npr.org/2011/11/29/142883184/demand-for-denver-apartments-outstrips-supply

Demand For Denver Apartments Outstrips Supply

The housing crisis has stalled home building but apartment construction is undergoing a bit of a renaissance. There’s now a huge pool of people forced to rent because they can’t afford to buy a home, or they were a victim of foreclosure. In Denver, there aren’t enough apartment vacancies.

Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 11:15:33

This is a joke, NAR-sponsored Lie.

The squad just renewed the lease at the same rate, going month-to-month would have been a 3% increase. If you are renting in Highlands, LoDo, WashPark, Cherry Creek, then yes you will pay a douchebag premium for renting in those areas.

And +1000 to the bitter renter comments above :)

Comment by AmazingRuss
2011-11-29 17:51:20

Was looking around for a new rental on craigslist today, and was shocked to see how many and how cheap they were. I’d say rents are down 20% over the last year.

 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2011-11-29 10:26:00

$9.99 Bad Pizza / “Brother” of another mother

What did wing-nut say?: “looks more like 666, as the devil is in the details…” Amen. ;-)

“heheeheeeheeeheeehee…”

Herman Cain considers dropping his presidential bid:
By Rachel Rose Hartman | The Ticket – 26 mins ago

Cain announced to staff during a conference call Tuesday morning that he is reassessing his presidential campaign, though he noted this is not the first time he has reassessed his 2012 plans.

“Now with this latest one we have to do an assessment as to whether or not this is going to create too much of a cloud in some peoples’ minds as to whether or not they should support us going forward,” Cain said, according to the Des Moines Register, in reference to White’s claim.

Cain reconfirmed that he regarded White as a friend and did assist her financially, but denied her claims of an affair.

“If a decision is made, different than we should plow ahead, you all will be the first to know,” Cain said.

He reportedly added that his campaign will arrive at a decision in the coming days.

Holly Bailey contributed to this story.

Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 14:53:45

He was a flavor of the month. Raise the flag and flag and see if anyone will salute.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-11-29 15:45:42

The ABR party has moved on…

 
 
 
Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 10:53:28

Quick renter story: Was trying to replace the outside flood lights and called the LL for fuse info so as not to be zapped. She told me to take the $7 bulbs off the rent. That’s $25 I just didn’t throw away on an over-priced mortgage. Woo-hoo! Still horribly expensive rent, but not bad considering an alternative. The house across the street is on the mkt for 550K. Wonder if the “owners” are getting $5500 a month in rent?

Nelson Muntz: Ha ha!

Comment by goon squad
2011-11-29 11:25:30

Loan-Ownership sucks. Take that $25 little victory and multiply it by thirty years of mortgage albatross debt slavery and it adds up :)

From where to where is your daily bicycle commute now that you’re carless?

Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 11:42:45

“From where to where is your daily bicycle commute now that you’re carless?”

Oooh, sore spot! I’ve gone from 20 miles every morning to 0 miles since I telecommute to SF 6 hrs a day. Getting (even) fatter, more out of shape, had to bail on my century ride (wife had to work weekends during harvest), sleeping worse, (even) crankier.

I did bike with an avocado tree in my pannier yesterday but only a half mile from the hardware store. We’ll grow it in a wine barrel in case we move. Wanted a fig tree too to balance myself out, but they looked scraggily.

And g-squad, it’s “car-free” not “car-less”. ;) Wife’s Mini will be paid off at the end of the year (just didn’t deal with writing the check), but cost of ownership and operation will still be in my favor. Now if I can just get her to bike to work… But it’s 9 hilly miles on a sketchy road and I’m not going to fight that battle nor would it be worth it for her to get hurt.

MrBubble

 
 
Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 12:02:09

She told me to take the $7 bulbs off the rent

Hah. For any work I do, i have to submit receipts to the prop mgmt company and simply get reimbursed via check. How likely do you think that makes me to do simple repairs on my own?

(read: highly unlikely).

A few of the sprinkler spikes had broken, and I wanted to replace them. It took me two trips to HD and $5 in parts to fix things. A sprinkler repair service wanted $75 to just come out, plus whatever in time/materials to fix. That’s how I learned how crappy things are with my management company and why I won’t do any more repairs myself.

Comment by MrBubble
2011-11-29 13:03:00

I agree, for the most part. If a toilet is running constantly, I’ll jiggle the handle and check to see that the chain isn’t fouled up, but I won’t replace the flapper if it’s rotten. I’ll change a lightbulb or fuse, but I won’t rewire something.

I think that doing minor things (and letting them know of what you are doing) puts the LL’s at ease (a bit) and make them more likely to give in on something (painting a wall, putting in a garden, having chickens, etc.) if they feel like they have good, caring tenants. No data, gut feeling only.

Ugh — I just read a similar msg below from Prime. Ah well. Back to the quarterly reports…

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 12:08:35

Funny—I sent my LL an email this morning asking for his permission to do a minor electrical repair myself.

I want to keep him happy, because I love the house, think the rent is more than fair, and have a great LL.

If doing minor maintenance helps keep him happy (trouble-free renter == happy LL), then it’s a small price to pay.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 12:11:40

We make sure to provide our LLs with a holiday gift each December. Coming up on year seven, it’s pretty much a family tradition by now!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 13:06:56

Funny—I sent my LL an email this morning asking for his permission to do a minor electrical repair myself.

Back at my last rental, I would ask my landlady if I could assist while she was making repairs. She was glad to have an extra pair of hands, and I learned a lot.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 11:37:47

November 29, 2011, 9:21 AM ET

Home Prices Disappoint, Hitting Futures
By Mark Gongloff

The long chain of better-than-expected economic data that helped drive stocks higher in October seems to have been broken.

The latest example is the Case-Shiller home-price index for September. It fell 0.6% from August, a harder drop than the 0.1% economists expected. The year-over-year decline fell to 4.11%, the worst since march.

This was the fifth straight monthly decline in home prices.

This news is ancient and probably somewhat to be expected, but it’s still unwelcome. There was a brief period there when people thought housing was actually going to be a bright spot in the economy. It’s harder to see that happening these days, though conceivably it couldn’t get a whole lot worse. Knock on wood!

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 11:41:35

This was posted yesterday by PB/CIBT late in the day, but I think it is worthy of a repost:


Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©

2011-11-28 23:17:47

Economics focus
House of horrors, part 2

The bursting of the global housing bubble is only halfway through
Nov 26th 2011 | from the print edition

MANY of the world’s financial and economic woes since 2008 began with the bursting of the biggest bubble in history. Never before had house prices risen so fast, for so long, in so many countries. Yet the bust has been much less widespread than the boom. Home prices tumbled by 34% in America from 2006 to their low point earlier this year; in Ireland they plunged by an even more painful 45% from their peak in 2007; and prices have fallen by around 15% in Spain and Denmark. But in most other countries they have dipped by less than 10%, as in Britain and Italy. In some countries, such as Australia, Canada and Sweden, prices wobbled but then surged to new highs. As a result, many property markets are still looking uncomfortably overvalued.

This raises two questions. First, since American homes now look cheap, are prices set to rebound? Average house prices are 8% undervalued relative to rents, and 22% undervalued relative to income (see chart). Prices may have reached a floor, but this is no guarantee of an imminent bounce. In Britain and Sweden in the mid-1990s, prices undershot fair value by around 35%. Prices in Britain did not really start to rise for almost four years after they bottomed. Some 4m foreclosed homes could come onto America’s market, which may hold down prices.

The second question is whether home prices in markets that are still overvalued are likely to fall. Some economists reject our measures of overvaluation, arguing that lower interest rates justify higher prices because buyers can take out bigger mortgages. There is some truth in this, but interest rates will not always be so low. The recent jump in bond yields in some euro-area countries has raised mortgage rates for new borrowers.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 13:10:59

From my perch in Tucson, this is what I’m seeing:

1. Compared to mid-2005 to about the end of 2009, there isn’t as much housing inventory on the market. I think a lot of people are waiting for prices to rebound (fat chance) or they may have tried to sell, but couldn’t find a buyer.

2. There are quite a few houses lurking in the shadow inventory. In my neck of the woods, a lot of them were bought as investments a few years ago. They were rented out, and I guess dealing with tenants while awaiting for double-digit appreciation turned out to be too much of a pain. So, they’ve gone back to the bank.

3. In the resale market, there are quite a few trashed out foreclosures. If you have a sense of adventure and are handy with tools, you might get a good deal.

4. There are a few houses priced well (as in, under $150k) and they are selling as long as they are in reasonable condition.

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 13:52:51

Tucson is a pretty unique case…the emptiest City in the US according to CNBC.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/44860467/The_10_Emptiest_US_Cities?slide=11

With that level of vacancy, it will take longer for prices to rebound in Tucson than in many other markets, as substantially all those empty homes/apartments need to be absorbed by renters or buyers first.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 14:08:32

Agreed, Rental Watch. I see what the above link refers to every day. Summary of our situation:

Rental vacancy rate: 15.9%
Homeowner vacancy rate: 6.8%

The emptiest city in the U.S. is the second largest city in Arizona: Tucson. With rental vacancies at 15.9 percent, the city is seventh most vacant among major cities, while the 6.8 percent homeowner vacancy rate is the highest in the country as of the second quarter of 2011.

What’s really laughable, at least from my perspective, is how our local developers are insisting on rezoning of major transportation corridors. For higher density.

I can’t help but wonder where all the people and business activity is going to come from to support this higher density. It’s not as if we can just put up a big magnet and draw them here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 14:24:24

When people ask about home prices going up…I point to vacancy rates.

Ultimately, supply and demand will cause prices to rise, regardless of whether the homes are being rented or “owned”.

If you have low vacancy, either prices will rise, if people are inclined to buy, which will pull up in it’s wake rental rates, or, if people are inclined to rent, will drive up rents, which will pull up in it’s wake home prices.

Regardless of any other data (shadow inventory, foreclosure rates, etc.), reduction of vacancy will come before a housing rebound.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2011-11-29 14:51:43

Food for thought: If purchase demand shows any sign of life the builders will come out of the woodwork and start building like crazy.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 15:25:55

Agree. However, in CA, the lead time can be substantial. Few new finished lots are being built today, and most homes that are being sold today are were built on finished lots that were constructed during the boom.

So, if there is to be a significant ramp-up in activity, it will be going from land to homes, not finished lots to homes. In CA, if you want to go from raw land (even if it is mapped) to actual completed homes, it will take at least 6 months (4-5 months to build a home off of a finished lot, and 1-3 months to do underground work, etc.), and potentially a year or longer if you need to do any work with a City, bringing utilities to the site, earthwork, etc.

Some of this work can happen concurrently, but my bet would be that builders will start out cautious.

And once that happens, lots of new jobs will be created, giving a boost to the rest of the economy.

 
 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2011-11-29 14:14:28

This raises two questions. First, since American homes now look cheap, are prices set to rebound? ”

Good question what’s the answer ? Here on the coast in Ventura Co. prices are still fairly high about equal to rents

I think there are lots of 1% around here. Keeps the prices high compared to Phoenix or Las Vegas. Plus building moratoriums equals chronic home shortgages.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 18:10:12

“…only halfway through…”

Take it from the magazine that was already publishing articles on the housing bubble back in 2003, a point when the Fed leadership was in full-fledged denial.

Let’s do a little math:

Bubble bursts 2006
Today, it’s 2011
Elapsed years 2011 - 2006 = 5
“Halfway through” means (roughly) 5 years to go = 2011 + 5 = 2016

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 13:14:00

Kansas University football coach gets $6.2 million dollar buyout, after 5-19 record.

http://tinyurl.com/7mvqvgb

Talk about “poor investments”. As the article states, 6.2 million will pay for tuition, room, board and books for 350 students. Or, using a little creative math, a 4 year degree for 87 students.

But the former coach is one of the “creative class”, where there is no such thing as “failure”, when it comes to paychecks.

What could you do with $6.2 million? How about funding full scholarships for the best 87 science and engineering students in the state? How about starting a state of the art “industrial park” where the best science and engineering students have access to the tools to build/create their ideas without going broke, or signing half of their rights away to some “Venture Capital” vulture?

Where does all this money come from, to pay $2 million dollars a year to a crappy football coach? From TV contracts, and rich alumni. Where do they get the money? From advertising, which comes from companies/alumni that are selling stuff to the wretched refuse. And how much are those products marked up, to pay for the TV Sports/Advertising Industrial complex?

Basically, J6P is helping to refine/pay for his own brain washing system. Sounds like “socialism” to me.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2011-11-29 15:26:09

I seen it said somewhere (here I think) that we have socialism for the rich and no-holds-barred captialism for the rest of us.

 
 
Comment by Va Beyatch in Norfolk VA
2011-11-29 13:33:34

Renter tip #3.

Ever have your slumlord say “I see no issue with the clothes machines, they’re profitable” when you report machines unable to undampen a single garment after an hour on maximum hot? I have.

Odd fact. The needed component (k to the e to the y) to open the utility door on said machine is standard among all money operated clothes machines. You can order it from parts suppliers. Open door, hit start, you’re good.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-11-29 16:05:26

Hey, Va Beyatch; did you catch my Cray-worship up above? Q for you there on what model you have.

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2011-11-29 13:36:10

Wow. Contrast the European Central Bank approach with that of the US Fed.

The European Central Bank failed to fully offset the extra liquidity created by its bond purchases for the first time in seven months, a sign of mounting tensions among euro-area banks.

The Frankfurt-based ECB said today that 85 banks bid a total of 194.2 billion euros ($259 billion) for seven-day term deposits. It had aimed to drain 203.5 billion euros, the amount its bond purchases have created since the program began in May last year. It last fell short of its intended total on April 26.

The ECB tries to drain the same amount from the banking system each week that its purchases have created to ensure they don’t swell the money supply and fuel inflation. It says this is what distinguishes its bond program from those of the Federal Reserve and Bank of England, which aim to increase the money supply to boost economic growth.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-29/ecb-fails-to-fully-offset-bonds-purchased-under-program-to-finance-eu-debt.html

Comment by Rental Watch
2011-11-29 14:27:53

The last EU CPI number that I saw was 3%. Wait until that number begins to fall in the face of a weakening European economy…then the ECB will see a green light to print, print, print.

Unless of course, the leaders decide to expand the ECB’s mandate sooner…

Comment by Neuromance
2011-11-29 15:34:11

IMHO, giving the Fed a dual mandate of stable prices (I read that as controlling inflation) AND maximum employment is a mistake.

Why is the Fed involved in managing employment? Isn’t that Congress and society’s job? Manipulating the currency to boost employment? It seems an invitation to abuse, especially at times like these. If the Fed were simply charged with maintaining the value of the currency, there would be less financial shenanigans involved with manipulating the currency and more real discussion about how the society can boost employment.

Instead of having a discussion about manufacturing, trade surpluses, Congress can avoid responsibility, focus on re-election and let unelected “technocrats” manipulate the money supply for short term employment changes. Unbelievable.

Bernanke recently tepidly suggested that Congress should do more to fix the economy, but that was cast on deaf ears as policitians focus on their real jobs - political theater and winning re-election.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 21:08:42

“Why is the Fed involved in managing employment?”

I’ll handle this one…

July 13, 2011, 5:20 PM ET

Humphrey-Hawkins: What’s That About?
By Katie Glueck

When Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke addresses the House Financial Services Committee twice a year as he did on Wednesday, he can thank the late lawmakers Sen. Hubert Humphrey (D., Minn.) and Rep. Augustus Hawkins (D., Calif.).

The Humphrey-Hawkins Act of 1978 expired, but the name lives on, used unofficially to describe the semi-annual reports the central bank’s policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee must present to Congress assessing the state of the economy and monetary policy. The reports, every February and July, are now mandated under a housing law passed in 2000.

Humphrey-Hawkins also reinforced the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate: Promote full employment and keep prices stable. The bill was introduced at the height of America’s stagflation woes, and was officially titled the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Neuromance
2011-11-29 21:39:52

Hmm. And ultimately Volcker raised the Fed Funds rate to get inflation back under control. And the government engaged in a borrow and spend spree to help employment.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 14:06:59

American Airlines files Chapter 11. Press releases notwithstanding, mainly to get out from under union contract and pension obligations.

Of course, things would be hunky-dory if it weren’t for the “union goons”. AA management is to be applauded for sticking it to them.

But if the same union goons use the same rules/laws to stick it to the banksters and MBS holders, they are “deadbeats”.

Consistency is sooooooo overrated……..

Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 14:29:19

X-GS, who’s applauding AA’s mgmt while at the same time calling ‘union goons’ deadbeats?

Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 15:00:40

He’s being sarcastic.

Comment by drumminj
2011-11-29 16:37:32

I think he’s saying there’s a double-standard/inconsistency. But that’s only true if the same person/people are making those two separate judgements.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 18:31:16

You obviously haven’t been around a $hitload of Red State Republicans like I live with every day.

To a man/woman, this summarizes their world-view precisely.

Pointing out this inconsistency just makes them mad.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-11-29 17:03:14

For a moment there you had me hoping. It’s no secret that I am more in favor of corporations than unions/OWS types. Partly as a reaction against the majority of the comments on HBB and other blogs. I still have some of my cash in banks (two different banks) and a credit union and T-bills. I don’t see a need to take money out of banks to make a stupid statement. My parents were with one of my banks. So it’s like 50 or 60 years.

Comment by combotechie
2011-11-29 17:57:57

“I don’t see a need to take money out of banks to make a stupid statement.”

Then take it out so they won’t have an opportunity to screw you.

Mega banks, such as BofA, are hurting bad and need money bad -this is why they wanted to impose a five-dollar fee for ATM withdrawls. They dropped their fee idea not because they no longer need the money; they dropped it because of the outcry of their customers.

BUT THEY STILL NEED THE MONEY, which suggests they will explore other opportunities to screw their customers.

They don’t get much money in the way of loans (because they’re not making many loans) so they need to make money any way they can. And they, like most anyone else, will take the path of least resistance.

Remember the adage: “When somebody shows you who they are, believe them the first time.”

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-11-29 15:46:37

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/budget/8924629/Autumn-Statement-2011-George-Osborne-unveils-public-sector-pay-cuts-on-eve-of-massive-strike.html

Millions of UK public sector workers being hit with pay cuts. Good. Now they might finally start getting pissed off when they see the banksters being bailed out and City of London grifters pocketing obscene bonues with taxpayer money. Ditto for the public sector workers in this country who voted for hope ‘n change or McSame/Palin.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2011-11-29 16:59:49

Seems like a good idea, however the article refers to the United Kingdom “State” employees as the recipients of the pay cuts.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 16:45:54

When I was growing up, my father and I frequently went target shooting. If I were ever to even hint that the gun club should offer such an event, oh, brother would I get a talking to. Such things were NOT appropriate, to say the least.

 
 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 16:18:01

Ahh the war machine must have it’s profits.

In September, President Obama awarded the Medal of Honor, the nation’s most prestigious military award, to Sgt. Dakota Meyer, the marine who saved 36 of his comrades during an ambush in Afghanistan.

Obama called Meyer one of the most “down-to-earth guys that you will ever meet.”

But today Meyer, 23, is having trouble getting a job because of allegations by defense contractor BAE Systems that he has a drinking problem and is mentally unstable. Meyer filed legal papers Monday claiming the allegations were in retaliation for objections he raised about BAE’s alleged decision to sell high-tech sniper scopes to the Pakistani military.

After leaving active duty in May 2010, Meyer worked at Ausgar Technologies, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business in California, until April 2011.

“He exhibited a maturity for his age and an insightful capability to get the job done and provide recommendations to improve on what we are doing. I was very impressed while he was working for us. He was an outstanding employee,” Tom Grant, a retired military naval officer and a senior program manager at Ausgar Technologies, told ABC News.

When asked about the allegations of mental instability and a drinking problem, Grant said, “While Meyer was working for me, I never saw evidence of either of those issues.”

In March 2011, Meyer began working at BAE Systems, a British military contracting company, where he learned the company was trying to sell advanced thermal optic scopes to the Pakistani military.

“We are taking the best gear, the best technology on the market to date and giving it to guys known to stab us in the back,” Meyer wrote to BAE Systems manager Bobby McCreight, his former co-worker, according to the lawsuit. “These are the same people killing our guys.”

news.yahoo.com/marine-won-medal-honor-fights-allegations-mentally-unstable-171346866.html

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-11-29 16:43:59

“Who the Gods would destroy, they must first make mad.”

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2011-11-29 16:51:10

Good on this guy for taking his story to the news media. I hope he raises a royal stink.

On a personal note, my mother once worked for a Medal of Honor winner. She was part of the staff at the Bartlesville, OK veterans hospital in the early 1950s.

Her boss was a full-blooded Cherokee and was treated horribly in Bartlesville. Because of Jim Crow laws, he could only be served in one bar and one restaurant in the whole town. My mom doesn’t recall hearing him complain, that was just how things were back then.

My folks were in Bartlesville because my dad got a job with Phillips Petroleum. The expectation was that he would spend his entire engineering career with them. But they found the local culture, if you can call it that, and the Jim Crow to be so stifling that they left after just two years.

As for my mom’s former boss, the Muskogee VA is named for him. It’s the Jack Montgomery VA, and I can’t think of anyone more deserving of such an honor.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-11-29 18:26:13

“These are the same people killing our guys”

“Our guys..” is so old paradigm/John Wayne thinking.

“Our guys” (new paradigm) = BAE upper management/stockholders

Sorry kid, but what does that have to do with anything?

Guess you are to young to have seen how MNCs have been “killing our people” (figuratively and literally) by selling out US Americans for a long time now.

Comment by Neuromance
2011-11-29 21:43:29

This reminds me of “Catch-22″.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 16:34:48

year ago, Spectrum Brands moved its headquarters back to Madison after a six-year run in Atlanta.

On Tuesday, the former Rayovac Corp. announced a deal with the state to invest $40 million in its Wisconsin operations, hire 60 new staffers immediately and keep its headquarters in Madison through 2016.

For help, Spectrum Brands is receiving an interest free, $4 million forgivable loan from the Wisconsin Economic Development Commission.

If Spectrum follows through on its plans and maintains at least 470 full-time employees in Madison until Oct. 1, 2016, it doesn’t have to pay the money back.

http://host.madison.com/ct/business/biz_beat/biz-beat-spectrum-brands-lands-million-from-the-state-to/article_5b14af4a-1ac6-11e1-92d0-001cc4c002e0.html#ixzz1f8jpNQ6I

The WEDC is Wisconsin’s lead economic development agency. Created in statute as a public authority, the WEDC is responsible for economic development activities previously administered by the Department of Commerce, a state agency eliminated on July 1, 2011.

What a great way to spread tax payer dollars directly to corporations. This stuff is killing the country. Talk about picking winners and loosers.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-11-29 16:42:17

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=198272

WSJ predictably unhappy about Judge Rakoff standing up for rule of law.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 18:07:09

They have to throw the occasional bone to the banksters who comprise an important readership constituency…

 
 
Comment by BlueStar
2011-11-29 18:45:22

Texas drought attracts scavengers and historians.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/texas-drought-is-revealing-secrets-of-the-deep.html

Interesting stories but this drought is really bad. The number of big trees that are dying around here will take a long time to replace. The water restrictions in most areas are mandatory and yet the NatGas fracking guys are consuming millions of gallons of water, mixing it with secret sauce fracking fluid and then injecting back into the ground.

 
Comment by measton
2011-11-29 20:02:23

What do you want to bet that this winning loto ticket is really claimed by someone close to the lottery management, and will the IRS let this stand. That’s a 125million dollar loss for them right?

Three wealth managers who won a $254 million Powerball jackpot in Connecticut Monday deny reports that someone else hired them to claim the ticket.

“To be clear, there are a total of three trustees, and there is no anonymous fourth participant,” the men said in a statement released by a representative, Gary Lewi, today.

Earlier, two sources told ABC News that Greg Skidmore, Brandon Lacoff and Tim Davidson were not the “real” winners of the lottery but rather a front for an anonymous winner.

The three men appeared with their attorney, Jason Kurland, at the Connecticut Lottery offices Monday to accept their winnings. There, Kurland announced that the trio had formed a trust, called the Putnam Avenue Family Trust, to manage the money.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2011-11-29 20:21:04

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGQIxYfKKtc

The gathering storm in Europe.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 21:49:13

“…apply more leeches…”

That is the perfect metaphor for banksters’ debt-based hair-of-the-dog remedies for the mother of all debt hangovers…

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 20:53:03

Something tells me the Obama campaign is going to be sad to see this rival exit the race.

The Cain mutiny
GOP voters don’t appear to care about his foreign policy gaffes, but they recoil over sexual harassment and infidelity allegations.
November 30, 2011

When Herman Cain told his staff Tuesday that he was doing a “reassessment” of his campaign after new accusations of adulterous behavior, many pundits saw it as the beginning of the end for the onetime GOP presidential front-runner. Maybe, or maybe not. But if his alleged affair with an Atlanta woman does prove the straw that broke the Cain campaign’s back, it will say something troubling about the conservative donors and voters who until now have supported him: They’re less bothered by his woeful lack of knowledge about foreign affairs than his apparent inability to keep his trousers zipped.

Cain’s policy pronouncements, like those of most of the GOP hopefuls, have largely been a recitation of tea party talking points. One area of distinction is his “9-9-9″ tax plan, which would eliminate loopholes and impose a 9% federal tax on sales, individual income and corporate income. We can understand why this plan would appeal to rightward-leaning voters, even though it is fraught with risks and would worsen the tax burden for the lower class. But another area in which Cain has stood out is his breathtaking ignorance of, and disdain for, key foreign trading partners and conflicts. A Cain presidency would be marked by rising hostility around the world, diminishment of U.S. international influence and frequent diplomatic breaches.

Think we’re exaggerating? Cain reveled in his own foreign policy shortcomings by saying in an October interview that when the media ask him “who’s the president of Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan, I’m going to say, ‘You know, I don’t know. Do you know?’” In response, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice commented that this “probably wasn’t a great thing to say if you’re running for president.” He has stated a belief that most American Muslims are extremists, offered to release every prisoner at Guantanamo Bay in a deal with Al Qaeda in exchange for a single American soldier, and suggested that China represented a threat to the U.S. because it is “trying to develop nuclear capacity” (China has had nuclear weapons since the 1960s). More recently, his inability to recall any details of U.S. policy in Libya was one of the more painful-to-watch video moments of the 2012 campaign.

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-11-30 08:48:36

They’re less bothered by his woeful lack of knowledge about foreign affairs than his apparent inability to keep his trousers zipped.

Everybody has been aware that one wing of the GOP has felt that way since the Clinton scandal. I would think you’d give them points for being consistent across party lines :-).

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 21:42:09

ECB’s Noyer: situation in Europe has significantly worsened
By Kevin Lim and Saeed Azhar
SINGAPORE | Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:38pm EST

(Reuters) - European Central Bank governing council member Christian Noyer said on Wednesday Europe’s debt crisis had significantly worsened, threatening global financial markets, but was confident the euro area would emerge stronger and more cohesive.

“The situation in Europe and the world has significantly worsened over the past few weeks,” Noyer said at a conference in Singapore. “Market stress has intensified.”

“We are now looking at a true financial crisis — that is a broad-based disruption in financial markets.”

Italy’s borrowing costs hit a euro lifetime high of nearly 8 percent on Tuesday, heaping more pressure on fractious euro zone leaders to staunch a two-year-old debt crisis that is threatening to splinter the euro zone bloc and push the world economy into a recession.

“In a period of intense market disruption, it is essential to ensure that the monetary policy transmission mechanism actually works. This may involve temporary and exceptional interventions on those market segments where dysfunctions are most apparent,” Noyer said.

He did not elaborate on the remarks.

Sources told Reuters last week that the ECB was looking at extending the term of loans it offers banks to two or even three years to try to prevent the euro zone crisis from sparking a global credit squeeze that will choke the world economy.

“The essential weakness of Europe does not primarily lie in the fragility of any of its components,” Noyer said. “Europe’s fragility comes from its difficulty to organize and manage in times of crisis the complex interactions occurring at the heart of its financial system.”

“It is essential to stabilize European bond markets. We have to recognize that the necessary degree of fiscal adjustment is heavily dependent on the level of market confidence.”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-11-29 21:52:29

EU Slavery: Media hiding truth about debt crisis
Uploaded by RussiaToday on Nov 27, 2011

RT’s Sara Firth talks to Aris Hatzistefanou, author of the documentary “Debtocracy”, who casts doubt on the course EU leaders have chosen, to tackle the debt crisis.

Comment by rms
2011-11-30 00:33:02

Exactly, the last step is the sale of public property, a la Russia.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2011-11-30 10:32:33

Timbuctoo (a poem)

Tim and I a huntin` went
Found us three whores in a tent
Since they were three and we were two
I bucked one and Tim bucked two

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post