December 30, 2011

‘Free Money’ That’s Not Free

It’s Friday desk clearing time for this blogger. “When Donna Vieira bought a $560,000 home in Reno in 2005, the San Leandro, Calif., resident thought she had the perfect second home. Six years and $350,000 worth of payments later, Vieira finds herself out of her Reno property and in the middle of an extended legal battle against Wells Fargo. Vieira alleges that she was the victim of both a fraudulent loan and a fraudulent appraisal. A second appraisal that came as she closed escrow revealed that the value of the home she bought was $243,000 less than the mortgage she signed, Vieira said. Vieira was so upset that she reported the original appraiser, whose license eventually got suspended.”

“‘I haven’t even moved into the house yet when I found out,’ Vieira said.”

“For Jenny and Robert Click, the loss of their Dale City home, scheduled to be sold at a foreclosure auction Jan. 6, has loomed over their holidays. Last week, the only sign of Christmas was the tree that took up a corner of the living room, where Click said she had cried tears of joy the day her family moved in 11 years ago. ‘I was thinking I had finally made it,’ she said. ‘I had my own house.’”

“When they bought the three-bedroom house for $87,000, Click was earning $18 an hour driving a dump truck. Robert Click was earning slightly more by driving a truck for a construction company. Once the run-up in house prices began, she said, they were bombarded with offers to refinance. They did so twice, pulling out $70,000 in equity to make much-needed repairs to the roof and a bathroom and to pay off their cars.”

“‘It’s like free money,’ is what they said,’ she recalled. ‘Except that it’s not free!’”

“The average Maryland home reassessed last year lost a record 22 percent of its value, while the average drop the year before was nearly 20 percent, assessors said. It’s hard for a homeowner to decide how to react to falling assessments, said Carlos Plazas, who lives in Patterson Park, one of the Baltimore neighborhoods the state just revalued. He likes the idea of a lower tax bill, but it would also mean that homes in his neighborhood have lost value. ‘I don’t know if it’s a good thing or not,’ said Plazas.”

“Winfield realtor Joan Turner, who tracks homes that may be headed for foreclosure, observed the price of many homes in foreclosure lately has been between $50,000 and $60,000. In addition to the moderately priced homes listed in foreclosure filings this fall, there were also a few with higher and lower mortgages, including a home with a $132,000 mortgage and a mobile home with a $6,000 mortgage.”

“But the picture was changed from 2009 and 2010, when foreclosure filings included homes with mortgages of up to $350,000. More than one high-end homeowner simply walked away during that period, Winfield realtor Alan Herrman said. Both Mike Mildfelt, president of the Community National Bank in Winfield, and John Sturd, community president in Arkansas City for the Union State Bank, pointed to lax mortgage-making on the part of brokers and outside lenders as a prime cause of those troubles.”

“‘There were a large group of folks who were not prepared to own a home’ who got mortgages in the 2005-2006 period, Mildfelt said.”

“With foreclosures still hitting the housing market hard, at least one metro city is so wary about empty houses turning into rundown rental properties that it plans to limit the number of rentals allowed on each block. Those types of rules are already established in Minnesota college towns such as Winona and Mankato, but as metro areas seek to try them, it could lead to a battle: property owners who can’t sell their vacant houses and say they could face foreclosure if they can’t rent them out vs. cities that say too many rentals can drag down everybody else’s property values.”

“City Council Member Jim Englin said too many rental properties can crush a neighborhood. ‘If I have three renters around me and you are telling me my housing value doesn’t go down, you are wrong.’”

“The Dzierzbickis live in Cary, Ill. They bought a house in Winona for their daughter while she attended Winona State, and they have been unable to sell it since her graduation this past spring. Although they spent $30,000 to upgrade the house for safe renting, the city wouldn’t let them rent rooms to students when their daughter was there, and it’s standing empty now because of the rental restriction, Ted Dzierzbickis said.”

“‘I have a very strong personal belief that the city is overstepping its bounds by telling us we can’t rent a property that we own,’ he said.”

“The well-known Northside Realtor at the other end of the phone line was angry. She had just come from a foreclosure closing on a $150,000 house. The defaulting homeowner, who put no money down and only made three payments, walked away from the closing with a $13,000 check, thanks to various government programs.”

“‘This is just wrong,’ she said. ‘The man makes $11,000 a month as a salesman. He trashed the house and walked away with a big check. The public needs to know that this type of thing is going on.’”

“According to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, resales are likely to rise by nine percent in 2012, to 36,000 transactions. It also anticipates that the annual average price for all home types will settle at $788,000 in 2011, which is 17 percent over that of the previous year. For 2012, the average price is forecast to increase by two percent to $805,000.”

“Although houses are expensive in Metro Vancouver, Central 1 Credit Union’s Pastrick doesn’t view the regional market as being in a bubble. ‘A bubble in real estate or in any asset market usually needs to have a fair amount of speculation present as well as very easy money,’ Pastrick said. ‘Money is cheap but not easy.’”

“Royal LePage’s third-quarter House Price Survey indicated that home prices in West Van have increased a staggering 25 per cent, the largest jump in the region. A detached bungalow in West Van rose to $1.2 million, up from $900,000, while two-storey homes jumped to $1.3 million, compared to $988,000 in the previous quarter.”

“From January to September 2011, 969 detached homes sold in West Vancouver with a median price of $1,780,000. Over the same period last year, 537 homes sold at a median price of $1,488,000. Bill Binnie, broker and owner of Royal LePage North Shore, told The Outlook one reason for the dramatic increase in prices was a ’shift in consumer demand’ from Asian buyers from Richmond to West Vancouver.”

“West Van realtor Jason Soprovich told The Outlook this spring marked ‘one of the most feverish pitches in purchasing power’ he’d seen in nearly 20 years.”

“Alice Batista readiliy admits she was blinded by dollar signs and slick advertising when she dialed up the Trump hotel and condo sales office back in 2006. The single mother of three became convinced that $50,000 was a small price to pay to get in on the ground floor of what was, at the time, the glitziest new high-rise planned for downtown Toronto — the five-star Trump International Hotel & Tower.”

“In fact, Batista became so swept up in the hype, within a few weeks she’d put $165,000 deposits on two units worth $2.4 million. Only as the Kitchener-area woman signed the legal documents would she find out that one of the suites — a one-bedroom condo with library on the 45th floor — was owned by the director of sales for the project. Legal documents obtained by the Star show that sales director Adina Zak bought the preconstruction condo for $948,100 in 2006 and flipped it to Batista six months later for $350,000 more.”

“That $1.3 million flip of an unbuilt unit to a new buyer violates a key condition in sales agreements, imposed on most buyers by developer Talon International Inc. That condition stipulates that units can’t be sold until completion. But her boss, Talon chief executive Val Levitan, defends the sale, saying he had a “moral obligation” to let Zak — ‘and a few other customers’ — buy a unit and flip them for their own profit. ‘Adina has been with me for 11 years. She is a very dedicated person who I wanted to do a favour for . . . Sometimes you make an exception.”

“Zak refused to comment when reached by the Star: ‘We’re on vacation and she’s not taking any calls,’ said her husband.”

“Batista is kicking herself for getting so caught up in the condo craze and Trump name. ‘I don’t belong in Trump tower,’ says the woman who has bought, renovated and rented out several homes, but never condos. ‘I thought I’d be able to get a Trump tower suite for less than everybody else. I didn’t think I’d get rich. I just thought I’d make a little money and maybe have a place to retire someday.’”

“For those watching local real estate values, it’s a frequent question: ‘After we’ve suffered through all that we have, when will there be light visible at the end of the tunnel?’ There is no better metaphor to describe the journey of ups and downs-well, downs-of the Malibu market. Actually, there is light visible at the end of the tunnel! For a specific portion of the local market, the darkness is turning to bright light.”

“Annual sales over the past four years have averaged about 150 home units in Malibu, not nearly enough to sustain previous values. (That is, the sales pace has been inadequate unless the inventory also stayed very low, which it has not). Whereas the joyous 2003-2005 years saw the tally of Malibu home listings below the 150 level, it bloated to more than 300 this past summer. Thus, inevitable price drops, now in the 40-45 percent range from the peak, have resulted.”

“The supply/demand dynamics get worse the higher you go. For properties listed at more than $5 million there have been 19 sales recorded, with 105 properties on the market. Talk about being in a dark, narrow place.”

“At least this can be said about current times: It is more encouraging than 18 months ago when all of Malibu’s micro-market box cars were deep in the mountain, the light faded from the rear and imperceptible ahead, scant few sales and way too many sellers at every price. Not far down the tracks, particularly for lower-priced investment-seekers, comes the next real estate phenomenon: all those buyers who grew comfortable standing on the platform, not realizing the choo-choo left the station.”




RSS feed

29 Comments »

Comment by Insurance Guy
2011-12-30 09:14:20

I went to Winona State. Winona is a great place. On the Mississippi river with very high bluffs on the west side.

I rented a room in a house. Shared the bathroom with 4 other apartments. Thought is was wonderful.

 
Comment by Insurance Guy
2011-12-30 09:18:04

My rent was $100 per month. My tuition was about $1,000 for the three semesters each year.

Just a great place in 1980 to 1984.

And even then there were complaints in the newspaper about all the housing going into rentals.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-12-30 09:32:38

“Six years and $350,000 worth of payments later, Vieira finds herself out of her Reno property and in the middle of an extended legal battle against Wells Fargo.”

Sounds like Wells Fargo just scored $350,000 worth of payments plus a house. Not bad!

Comment by Reno Guy
2011-12-30 12:35:27

Zillow indicates that the Vieiras purchased the house in 2005 for 718K. Public records show a 560K Deed of Trust, adjustable rate mortgage. Even if her payment was 3k a month it would not amount to 350k. It appears that Ms. Vieira put a substantial down payment on this place, which is now gone and is probably the source of her litigious anger. House now listed for 230k, still a little high, I might look at it but the Lis Pendens is a problem.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-12-30 23:20:14

“…purchased the house in 2005 for 718K. …
House now listed for 230k, still a little high,…”

Stupid is as stupid does.

– Forrest Gump

 
 
 
Comment by snake charmer
2011-12-30 09:36:20

“… grew comfortable standing on the platform, not realizing the choo-choo has left the station”
__________________________/

Hey there Malibu Times, I’ve seen a picture of that train:

http://www.thefloridakeys.com/history.htm

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-12-30 09:43:04

“‘It’s like free money,’ is what they said,’ she recalled. ‘Except that it’s not free!’”

Awesome money-quote, Ben! :-) :-)

I would LOVE to know how long it took this simple fact to dawn in her consciousness.

The word “loan” generally refers to something that has to be paid back, with interest—in other words, it never refers to “free money”.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2011-12-30 10:10:33

The Free $hit Army suffers another casualty.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-12-30 10:40:19

So, they buy a house ten years ago for $87K. Then pull out $70K in “equity”. In other words, the theoretical “value” of their house appreciated almost 100% in 10 years.

When they were kids, these two always had “Kick Me” signs taped to their backs

Comment by polly
2011-12-30 11:53:26

My parents almost doubled their mortgage (from $18K to about $35K) to fix the roof and the septic system when I was a kid (not sure how old - maybe when I was around 10). By the time I was a junior in high school my father’s income had increased over 500% from when they bought the house when I was 2 or 3.

It isn’t almost doubling the mortgage that is the only issue. What is happening to your income matters quite a bit too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2011-12-30 12:56:59

Two points about your story jump out to me, Polly.

The first point is that your parents took the loan proceeds and put it back into the house in the form of financing major repairs.

The second point (and I’m making an inference here about the timing) is that your father’s 500% rise in income was probably assisted by the inflationary economic times of the late 1970’s.

Income does indeed matter. So does the intended use of the funds from the proceeds of the refinance.

 
Comment by polly
2011-12-30 14:37:00

I think my father’s increase in income had some help from the inflation of the 70’s, but also from a switch in industries (paper and packaging products to high tech).

The article about these people said that the money went to home repairs (not remodeling, repairs) plus paying off their cars (not getting new cars, just getting rid of the car loans). I see that as pretty similar to what my parents did.

That is why I brought up the story here. This doesn’t sound all that different than what my parents did - almost doubling the loan and doing it for necessary repairs. The difference was that my dad made more money when they did the refi and kept making more money after the refi.

I have to say that the money my parents took out ALL went to needed repairs. The leaking roof had resulted in some water damage to my bedroom wall. They didn’t fix the cosmetic crack in the wall. Once it was clear that the leak was fixed, my mom glued cork tiles to the wall so I could hang up posters and pictures and cards and whatever else I wanted on the wall with push pins. It was kind of fun.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2011-12-30 09:55:37

From the Malibu article: “As seen time and again, the different price tiers follow each other’s trends. As previously described, when things were getting worse, it happened first for the low-end condos (in early 2008). This year has seen the upper end suffering most.”

A metaphor: When upwelling in the ocean occurs plankton blooms due to the available nutrients, and this plankton feeds the anchovies and the krill and their populations explode, this in turn feeds the tuna and the whales who show up so as to cash in on it all.

When the upwelling ceases the plankton die off; this causes mass starvation among the anchovies and the krill which causes them to die off. The only alternative to the whales and the tuna, who feed on the anchovies and krill, is to leave the area and search out another part of the ocean that has upwelling, else they too will starve and die off.

But what if the tuna and whales can’t find another place where there is upwelling? Then they too are screwed, are they not?

And this is what seems to be happening to the super rich. The super rich indirectly cashed in all these years on the upwelling of easy money that allowed the unwashed masses to borrow-and-spend. It was this borrowing and spending that allowed the super rich to live the good life because they one way or another got a healthy cut of each of transaction done by the unwashed masses.

The super rich were like the tuna and whales that fed off the anchovies and the krill that in turn fed off the plankton, and the plankton only existed because there was upwelling of nutrients.

Take away the nutrients and the tuna and whales are hosed. Take away the easy money from the unwashed masses and the super rich are hosed.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2011-12-30 10:44:42

Yeah, but you forget that the whales and the tuna were able to “save and invest” their plankton and krill.

The bankster whales are currently swindling/stealing the plankton and krill from the other whales and tuna. (Re: MF Global)

Comment by Carl Morris
2011-12-30 11:06:05

But no matter how much plankton and krill you stockpile, what’s their nutritional value once they’ve been dead for a couple of years?

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-12-30 12:08:43

The whales stockpile them in a different form—blubber—so it does have nutritional value over time. It’s not like they carry around a bunch of dead plankton & krill.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2011-12-30 12:46:24

I’m not so sure about that.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-12-30 23:26:10

“…blubber…”

The whale’s equivalent to a bankster’s mattress money…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-12-30 23:24:35

Are you a marine scientist? I love the ecosystem analogy to the economy!!

 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2011-12-30 10:41:14

Donna Vieira bought a $560,000 home in Reno in 2005…A second appraisal that came as she closed escrow revealed that the value of the home she bought was $243,000 less than the mortgage she signed.

Huh. That’s quite a difference. And the article states she put $151K down so the mortgaged amount would be $409K. Are we to read this as the appraisal came in at $166K (mtg amount of $409K minus the $243 K) or is it $243K less than the sale price of $560K which would be $317K?

Either way, there had to be data out there to support the fact that $560K was an excessively high price. I mean Zillow has lots of issues, but I’ve found that the “Zestimate” is at least somewhere in the ballpark of what a house will appraise for. I found that to be the case when I bought my house, I found that to be the case when friends refinanced.

I’m not saying there wasn’t fraudulent loan and appraisal practices, but geez-oh-man, people, do your legwork!

 
Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy
2011-12-30 11:00:00

“‘It’s like free money,’ is what they said,’ she recalled. ‘Except that it’s not free!’”

‘Its like its too good to be true… Except that its not really true!’
‘Its like money grows on trees… Except that it doesn’t really grow on trees!’
‘Its like I’m made out of money… Except that I’m not actually made out of money!’
Its like a whole new paradigm… Except that its not really a paradigm shift!’
Its like its different this time… Except its not really different!’
‘Its like the sun shines out my a$$… ‘

I could go on and on…

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2011-12-30 23:27:21

“It’s like candy coming out of a unicorn’s a$$!”

 
 
Comment by b-hamster
2011-12-30 11:56:16

“We did our due diligence and continued to make our mortgage payments for years in the hopes that they would work with us,” Vieira said.

~~~

Um, the due diligence should be performed before you sign the paperwork, not after.

 
Comment by jbunniii
2011-12-30 12:36:15

When Donna Vieira bought a $560,000 home in Reno in 2005, the San Leandro, Calif., resident thought she had the perfect second home.

She must have a pretty low standard for “perfect.”

Six years and $350,000 worth of payments later, Vieira finds herself out of her Reno property and in the middle of an extended legal battle against Wells Fargo.

“Finds herself…” as if she fell asleep like Rip Van Winkle and woke up in a financial mess?

$350k in six years = $4861/month, which makes no sense even if she financed the entire $560k. There are some important details we are not being told.

Comment by eastcoaster
2011-12-30 13:33:00

I’m sure they’re factoring in her $151,000 downpayment.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2011-12-30 13:53:03

Still leaving a rather significant payment of $3333.00/mo.

Comment by Steve J
2011-12-30 21:33:07

Don’t forget property tax and insurance and PMI.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by FED Up
2011-12-31 12:43:57

More to the story:

“Vieira and her husband, Nuno, started a successful real estate appraisal business at the peak of the housing market.”

http://americawhatwentwrong.org/stories/family-wont-give-up/

Since it says it was a second home, wonder if they tapped equity in the first home for a down payment?

 
Comment by Jim Wagoner
2011-12-31 15:38:15

This story is being repeated everywhere, but the real problem is people owing more than the house is worth. Even if they can make the payment it sometimes isn’t worth keeping the house, especially if its an investment property.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post