January 4, 2012

Bits Bucket for January 4, 2012

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

291 Comments »

Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 00:12:36

Joshua Tree Extension 2.0 available for download. New features:
* Firefox 9.0 support (should work up to FF 20 :lol: )
* Updated visual design to allow for faster page load/layout

Use the link under my name, or here: Download

I’ve been using it for a few days and haven’t run into any issues. Do let me know if y’all install it and run into a problem.

Comment by seen it all
2012-01-04 05:15:29

Way to go!
The extension increases the value of the site more than granite countertops does for a used home!

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 09:06:45

Is that a compliment or an thinly-veiled insult? :-)

Comment by Seen it all
2012-01-04 10:12:59

I think it’s a “backhanded compliment”.

I shouldn’t be so vague in my praise. The extension is great, and Dummin is to be thanked for his efforts!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 10:15:15

The extension is great

Thank you drumminj for it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2012-01-04 10:03:41

I’m confused. There’s a firefox extension that shoves spiky trees up people’s posteriors?

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 10:05:27

Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 10:22:14

Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

and given rule #34 of the internet, there’s bound to be photos of it…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 10:04:09

Many tanks for yer efforts drumminj!

It seems the computer industrial complex has learned well from the automobile industrial complex:

15″ wheel?, sure no problem … what bolt pattern? …what year?

(The wheel$ on the ford/chevy/toyota/vw/jeep/studebaker go round & round…) ;-)

Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 10:24:03

15″ wheel?, sure no problem … what bolt pattern? …what year?

and what offset, width…

(just ordered a full-size spare tire for my car and had to sort through all that. What a PITA).

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 16:06:59

And what a rumpin’ thumpin’ extension it is! Thanks, drumminj!

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 18:04:54

drummin, I am _loving_ the extension. I should have started using it ages ago!

Thanks!

Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 18:11:08

drummin, I am _loving_ the extension. I should have started using it ages ago!

Glad to hear you’re finally on board. I can’t understand why you didn’t try it out sooner :P

Feel free to ping me with feedback/ideas. That goes for anyone using it. I have a bunch of things taking up my spare time, but find a break every now and again to tweak the software.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 18:22:27

For a while I was using a research tool that would diff two version of any webpage and show the differences highlighted. It gave me enough of the benefits that I was getting by with it, but eventually stopped running even that.

Skipping around to new posts is way easier with a Next/Prev buttons (a feature I had asked them for a long time back, btw).

The barrier for me was that I had to switch to Firefox…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by rms
2012-01-04 19:14:11

Feel free to ping me with feedback/ideas.

Are you using a cookie to track the db time-stamp?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 20:33:57

Are you using a cookie to track the db time-stamp?

initially i used cookies, but cookies get sent to the server each time, which is a waste of bandwidth.

I now store a compressed list of comment IDs in browser local storage (I forget the API name).

Why do you ask?

 
Comment by rms
2012-01-04 23:42:18

Why do you ask?

Just curious.

I now store a compressed list of comment IDs

The comment IDs are not sorted, yet the movement appears threaded.

 
 
Comment by desertdweller
2012-01-05 23:46:20

Thanks Drumminj… I got yours the first time, it was great.

Not sure if I am using this or is it working.
Have a mac now not a pc.

Thanks for any headsup.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Robin
2012-01-04 00:27:02

Why do I care about Iowa?

To see (twit) Newt Gingrich fall due to his arrogance and pride.

To see simple truth , honesty, and consistency be rewarded, as reflected in Ron Paul’s numbers.

To see Santorum rewarded for a solid platform devoid of pandering to Christian fundamentalists.

It’s all good. Let the games begin!

Let the media reap the benefits of unconstrained media buys by the PACs.

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 06:31:28

Ron Paul #3!!! He needs to run as an independent with Dennis Kucinich on a platform of no wars, no bailouts, and End The Fed.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 06:57:28

+1. A REAL choice instead of the Hollow Man Coke & Pepsi offered up by Wall Street’s Republicrat duopoly.

 
 
Comment by Politicians Are Feces®
2012-01-04 06:34:10

Mitt-f*cking Zombie. Come on.

Looks like four more years of change we need with a side of hope.

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 11:19:13

Need to push the meme that Romney is just like the guy who laid off your parents.

He’s a “job creator” just like Chainsaw Al Dunlap was at the helm of Sunbeam…

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 12:13:26

Funny you should mention Al Dunlap, goon squad.

I just got back from visiting family in eastern PA. Which required the use of Philadelphia International Airport.

Back in the day, the world HQ of Scott Paper was just down the road from the airport. Nowadays, the now-former HQ is pretty much surrounded by the airport. Matter of fact, you could probably taxi your 737 up to the back door.

After the Dunlap gutting of Scott Paper, that HQ sat empty for a long time. It now appears to be fully occupied, and I never thought I’d see that happen.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 19:48:35

How do you know Romney isn’t the person that laid off many HBBers parents?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-01-04 06:39:26

There’s a lot to feel good about with Iowa. After having no voice for many years, citizens who don’t buy into the perpetual war doctrine now have a seat at the table. ‘It is time to travel back in history and compare to the 2008 GOP Iowa Caucus. The winner of the caucus was Mike Huckabee with Mitt Romney taking second and John McCain in fourth. Take a look at the vote Ron Paul obtained in the 2008 caucus, a measly 11,841 votes. Compare to his third place finish in the 2012 caucus of over 25,000 votes’

It was remarkable to hear Sarah Palin say Paul’s backers shouldn’t be marginalized and that the party needs them. That the US is “broke”, the implication being that we can’t afford the empire. Let the other candidates go on about “American exceptionalism”. Reality has a way of creeping in and that’s always good news.

‘The last convoy of American troops drove into Kuwait on Sunday morning, punctuating the end of the nearly nine-year war in Iraq. To keep details of the final trip secret from insurgents — or Iraqi security officers aligned with militias — interpreters for the last unit to leave the base called local tribal sheiks and government leaders on Saturday morning and conveyed that business would go on as usual, not letting on that all the Americans would soon be gone.’

‘The Iraqis are going to wake up in the morning, and nobody will be there,’ said a soldier who identified himself only as Specialist Joseph.’

I wish there were as many candidates against patriot acts, wars and bailouts as there are for these things. But we have to settle for what we can get, and one victory from last night is the establishment is realizing that Paul’s campaign isn’t about him, but about us, the people who want a different course in Washington.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 06:49:13

There’s a lot to feel good about with Iowa. After having no voice for many years, citizens who don’t buy into the perpetual war doctrine now have a seat at the table.

Agree. But the strong showing of neo-con stooge Santorum shows that either the Diebold vote counting machines got hacked or the same mutants who supported McCain are lurching forth to install someone just as vile.

Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:04:18

“…either the Diebold vote counting machines got hacked…”

That thought definitely crossed my mind. For one thing, how likely is it for the spread between the top two candidates to narrow to eight votes, unless one of them happens to be the new “Not Romney” Republican candidate?

Results for Iowa Republican Caucus (U.S. Presidential Primary)
Jan 03, 2012 (100% of precincts reporting)
Mitt Romney 30,015 24.6%
Rick Santorum 30,007 24.5%
Ron Paul 26,219 21.4%
Newt Gingrich 16,251 13.3%
Rick Perry 12,604 10.3%
Michele Bachmann 6,073 5%
Jon Huntsman 745 0.6%
Herman Cain 58 0%
Buddy Roemer 31 0%
No Preference 135 0.1%
Other 117 0.1%

Source: AP

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jbunniii
2012-01-04 09:10:43

It’s amazing how tiny these numbers are. The total number of votes cast was a whopping 122,000, and yet all the candidates had to campaign for weeks to fight over those votes. Meanwhile none of them is likely to even visit California, population 37 million.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2012-01-04 10:06:39

California will cast it’s electoral votes for the democrat, period. Why should they bother?

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 10:17:28

“Meanwhile none of them is likely to even visit California, population 37 million.”

CA, bunch of throw-backs, too many “DIFFERENT” churches, hippie/civil war re-enactments, automobiles, evil environMENTAL pollution protection laws/fines, brothers of a different mother South-of-the-border, WWII/Korean/Vietnam/Grenada/Gulf-all-of-’em v1.1-1.6-2.0-3.1 vets $ucking from the citizen-taxpayer$ “tis-ALL-the-Gov’t’s-fault” $traw … ignore us. ;-)

 
Comment by jbunniii
2012-01-04 10:24:39

California will cast it’s electoral votes for the democrat, period. Why should they bother?

Not in the Republican primary, it won’t.

 
Comment by butters
2012-01-04 10:51:09

It’s not cheap to campaign there. People like Bachman, Santorum, Paul etc. can compete with Goldman Lackeys like Romney and Perry in CA.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 17:57:55

When you throw in the Democrat-on-Arrival illegals and the ever-growing Free $hit Army, the Dems have CA locked up tight.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-01-04 07:29:51

‘the strong showing of neo-con stooge Santorum’

Well, that could be characterized as remarkable. A guy who had trouble getting a couple dozen people to his rallies. Look, this is republican politics. Check out this video:

‘Republican Strategist: Iowa GOP Will Not Allow Ron Paul To Win’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQXVB9buAmc

It doesn’t matter. This stuff has been going on for years. RP got as many delegates as anyone in Iowa and that’s what counts in the primary. And as the field narrows, it won’t be 7 police state-war-mongers against 1.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 07:35:48

http://www.dailypaul.com/199753/iowa-outcome-ideal-for-ron-paul

RP went into Iowa with a strong trajectory and an army of intensely loyal supporters. His strong showing in the face of massive Establishment GOP opposition is sent a strong message that the people are waking up.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 07:40:52

And as the field narrows, it won’t be 7 police state-war-mongers against 1.

Ben, check out the cartoon at 1:38 of this EXCELLENT rap song by a Ron Paul supporter. My sentiments exactly. The images of the TSA gropees hit a nerve as well.

http://www.dailypaul.com/198546/hot-new-ron-paul-rap-videoawesome

 
 
Comment by polly
2012-01-04 10:13:39

“shows that either the Diebold vote counting machines got hacked”

You are aware that it was a caucus, not an election, right? I don’t think they use machines.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 07:13:50

If RP isn’t nominated, the GOP deserves to lose…. and will.

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 09:14:11

Sing this all together kidz:

bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-01-04 07:45:07

“It was remarkable to hear Sarah Palin say Paul’s backers shouldn’t be marginalized and that the party needs them.”

That’s not at all remarkable, for quite a while now, Palin’s job has been to round up the rogue teapartiers and libertarians who stray from the GOP herd and bring ‘em back home. They need those votes. That’s a big part their base.

What is remarkable is the radio show you posted, Ben, in which an Iowa GOP insider reveals the real disdain with which the party bigwigs hold Paul and his supporters.

Paul needs to leave the Republican party and run as an independent. What’s he doing in that party anyway?

Comment by Ben Jones
2012-01-04 07:50:41

‘What’s he doing in that party anyway?’

The first time I met Paul, he was announcing a run for congress in my district in Texas in the mid-90’s. I had breakfast with him that morning and the first thing I said was don’t run as a republican, go independent. He told me that it is impossible to get elected unless you run in one of the two parties.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lureky
2012-01-04 08:21:04

In Texas that means Republican or Republican.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 09:06:16

He told me that it is impossible to get elected unless you run in one of the two parties.

But somehow, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders managed to accomplish this feat. He calls himself a Democratic Socialist but is officially classified as an Independent.

 
Comment by Steve J
2012-01-04 10:10:32

Vermont is a very very small state. It’s population (600k)is less tha 20% of Iowa.

Hardly deserves two Senators.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 10:13:52

Hardly deserves two Senators.

“Deserve’s got nothin’ to do with it.”

 
Comment by Steve J
2012-01-04 10:18:04

The Constitution is a living document after all.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 10:23:01

In Texas that means Republican or [white-hat] Repubican. ;-)

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-01-04 13:40:40

“The Constitution is a living document after all.”

Seems more dead than alive to me.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 06:53:19

“To see (twit) Newt Gingrich fall due to his arrogance and pride.”

For good measure, he went down swinging. It’s in his blood: Remember how he piled on over Clinton’s intern affair while secretly carrying on one of his own?

Since attack ads against Gingrich worked so well for Romney in Iowa, I guess Newt will now try to turn the tables on Mitt in New Hampshire?

Jetting to New Hampshire, Newt Gingrich Tees Up Attack
by Joy Lin | January 04, 2012

Five minutes before midnight, just as Mitt Romney wrapped up his victory speech in Iowa, Newt Gingrich’s charter plane made its way across the windswept runway of the Des Moines airport and jetted off into the sky.

On board: 30 passengers, including Gingrich, his wife and members of the press, riding the two hour and 14 minute flight to Manchester at the speed of darkness.

Light chatter could be heard throughout the cabin as the flight attendant drew the curtains between reporters and first class; there would be little restful sleep that night.

“Together we survived the biggest onslaught in the history of the Iowa primary,” Gingrich said earlier to a half-empty room of 100 supporters in downtown Des Moines.

Early results indicated the one-time frontrunner would come in a distant fourth place at 13 percent and it was at that percentage point he stubbornly remained throughout the night. Whether or not there’s a fourth ticket out of Iowa, Gingrich’s parting words to the people there teed up the New Hampshire strategy he’s counting on to effort an unlikely nomination.

In his speech he congratulated Ron Paul for his third place finish but blasted the Texas congressman for being weak on foreign policy. Most importantly, he left his choicest words for Mitt Romney, who has a wide lead in New Hampshire and is expected to win the primary.

Gingrich told the audience that voters have yet to decide “whether this party wants a Reagan conservative who helped change Washington in the 1980s with Ronald Reagan and helped change Washington in the 1990s as speaker of the House” or whether “we want a Massachusetts (moderate) who, in fact, will be pretty good at managing the decay but has given no evidence in his years in Massachusetts of any act to change the culture or change the political structure or change the government.”

Wednesday morning, New Hampshire Union Leader newspaper subscribers were waking up to find a full-page ad bought by the Gingrich campaign — their effort to draw a bright line of contrast between a “bold Reagan conservative” and a “timid Massachusetts moderate.”

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 07:29:05

The best thing to come out of the Iowa elections was the death knell delivered to the campaigns of Michelle Bachman, Rick Perry, and the consummate Establishment GOP insider and influence peddler New Gingrich. Ron Paul almost single-handedly deserves credit for taking down Gingrich with his devastating “Serial Hypocricy” TV ads. From this day forward, the oligarchs and their Republicrat hirelings will have to deal with the shocking realization that their monopoly on what Americans are allowed to see and hear, via their control over the corporate media and Ministry of Truth cable news networks, has now been upset irrevocably by the power of the REAL truth unleashed through independent media and funded by defiant souls who refuse to be regarded as serfs in the incorporated globalist plantation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jzi3HBCS2M

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 10:52:58

:-) Pleasant rant Sammy!

“and their Republicrat hirelings”

(What’s a “TrueBeliever / True Hypocrite” 18-29 year old off-spring supposed to do, marry/cohabitate outside the “family” genetic line and $uffer the con$equence$?)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-01-04 22:36:09

Sammy,

Although I disagree with much of Ron Paul’s agenda, I continue to $upport his campaign for precisely this reason. He is an authentic voice in a line-up of corporatist robots.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 18:06:18

Gingrich told the audience that voters have yet to decide “whether this party wants a Reagan conservative who helped change Washington in the 1980s

The veneration of Saint Ronny by so-faux “conservatives” like Newt makes me want to puke. Reagon got 241 Marines blown up by sticking them into the middle of a 2,000 year old, five sided argument in Lebanon, not to mention massively increasing the Federal budget using borrowed money. When the Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of 70 years of forcing an unnatural order on human beings and distinct peoples and ethnicities, the military industrial complex was quick to say the culprit was the USSR’s failed attempt to outspend us. Sure. Conservatives need a hero who does more than pay lip service to conservative values (not to be confused with religious right “family values”)and principles.

 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 07:09:26

I heard 5 minutes of Santorum’s speech last night (radio stations all carried it, unfortunately). Bibles and Guns, yeah I heard that part. Political Theatre for sure.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 07:18:14

When will Preacher Rick release his Reproductive Organ Management Policy proposal?

Comment by Ben Jones
2012-01-04 07:35:29

I think Perry’s gonna bail. But just to show how this political season has gone, recall that when Perry announced he was immediately considered the front runner. I remarked at the time that I doubted most republicans even know who he was. Jeebus, Trump didn’t even formally get into the race and he was considered the front runner!

It’s a strange primary.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:38:29

It’s a strange party.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 07:43:41

Yeah Perry will bail but I was talking about the other “Rick”.

(Did you get my email Jonesy?)

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 07:54:47

It’s a strange party.

As Zbigniew Brzezinski observed recently that “the American public is abysmally ignorant about the world;” the mass media isn’t much better; and the Obama administration and Democrats are “frozen in the face of this complexity, and the party out of power is raving mad.”

Ron Paul’s popularity in Iowa a sign of a war-weary America

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-201201031830–tms–wpfafftr–v-a20120103jan03,0,7670749.column

….The clear crossover vote-getter issue on which Paul has differed from the rest of the candidate crowd is war: his hostility to the commitment of both Democratic and Republican administrations to prosecuting undeclared war in the Middle East, South Asia and everywhere else that is harboring what the American government has chosen to identify as agents of “terror,” “Islamic terrorists” or “violent extremists.”

Americans are not much given to pacifism. We are a fairly bloody-minded society, even though for many years we were given over to isolationism, which is not at all the same as pacifism. Paul is not a pacifist in the classical sense; he served as an Air Force flight surgeon during the Vietnam War, and in the National Guard. He is an old fashioned mind-our-own business American of the kind that opposes going abroad to seek out monsters to destroy, as has been the American policy in the Middle East during most of the last half-century.

He has a crankish libertarian electoral program, which is why his attempts over the years to establish himself as a national political figure have not succeeded until now….

 
Comment by polly
2012-01-04 09:10:01

My question is whether Perry will throw his money to Santorum. I haven’t heard any media people mention it, but they certainly have been talking about Santorum not having enough money right now (or as of last night, anyway).

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 09:18:05

“Ron Paul’s popularity in Iowa a sign of a war-weary America”

Is there any other choice for war-weary Americans? It seems like Obama has been more hawkish than W so far, and the other Republican candidates are all trying to position themselves as more hawkish than Obama.

 
Comment by Montana
2012-01-04 09:50:42

I hear Obama is currently trying pretty hard to extricate us from Afghanistan, and we are out of Iraq. Seems he’s doing what people want, but had to make a big show of hawkishness first.

The problem with Paul is, if he were elected he’d be going into office indicating saying he wouldn’t fight, and that invites a lot of mischief. Obama played it the traditional way, acting all hawkish while secretly trying to find excuses to get out and save face.

At least that’s the way it seems.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 09:55:39

“if he were elected he’d be going into office indicating saying he wouldn’t fight”

He never said he wouldn’t fight; he just says that we shouldn’t police the world. If a war came to our shores, he would not hesitate to defend our country.

 
Comment by Steve J
2012-01-04 10:16:42

“pretty hard”???

Isn’t Obama just following the time table establish by Bush 4 years ago?

Or is spending 3 years exiting a war pretty darn fast for a modern army? If he wasn’t trying hard, how many years would it have taken??

At least he signed that presidential order closing the Gitmo prison 3 years ago. I figure another 10 or 20 years and the prisoners there might just get a trial.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 10:34:02

“He is an old fashioned mind-our-own business American of the kind that opposes going abroad to $eek out monster$ to de$troy, as has been the American policy in the Middle East during most of the last half-century.”

As Ronnie Ray-gun was oft apt to proclaim:

“There yous go again, attacking American Free Enterprise, $cotu$ Corp.Inc Profit$, and the perpetual do-nothing to change the importation of ever declining cheap foreign OIL. Yous bunch of $olar-priu$ hippies!” or something like that… ;-)

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2012-01-04 18:03:38

PB, there is another choice for war weary Americans: Gary Johnson, who is the ex Governor of New Mexico. He switched from Republican to Libertarian so that he can be on every state’s ballot.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 18:08:37

I like Gary Johnson, too. If he’s on the ballet and RP isn’t, he’s got my vote.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 18:25:06

If he’s on the ballet

It would be interesting to see him in a tutu…

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2012-01-04 19:00:37

Prime, I guess you must be alone in having such an interest!

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2012-01-04 19:03:07

oops - I backed up a bit and found the spelling…Ok..Got it now! Still, I would not be interested in seeing Gary Johnson in a tutu (or Reverend Tutu in a Tutu, for that matter…Or for seeing anyone/anything in a Reverend Tutu (ewwww!)).

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 19:50:38

Gary Johnson polling at 9% nationally, inching further toward Obama

Karl Dickey, West Palm Beach Libertarian Examiner

January 3, 2012

Libertarian Party Presidential candidate, Gary Johnson, is growing in popularity as more people learn more about him and his policies. Just a few months ago, Johnson was polling in the 2-5% range and since his jump to the Libertarian Party from the GOP, he is gaining support from all factions of political ideologies. He is now at 9% and that figure will continue to grow with additional media coverage. He seems to be loved by liberals and conservatives alike. According to the poll, President Obama has a 43% chance of re-election.

As Obama’s approval ratings drop further with 52% of Americans disapproving of the way Obama is doing his job as President, and as America rates Congress at 8% approval rating, they are looking for alternatives. More and more people are seeking out a better political party than the one they currently belong as they realize the politicians they have put into office have betrayed them.

Visit Gary Johnson website

http://www.garyjohnson2012.com

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 20:39:50

Or for seeing anyone/anything in a Reverend Tutu (ewwww!)).

Ewwww indeed! :-)

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix and Tampa
2012-01-05 02:28:09

Yep Gary Johnson goes one further than Ron Paul and favors all my social liberal issues. At least Ron Paul would leave it up to the states to decide, not a federal issue…

 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 07:46:09

I hate Presidential election years, period. Yawn. They’re all full of themselves and full of you know what. Everyone of them is bought and sold.
I have my differences with RP, but the guy is full of original ideas and means well. The rest are vermin.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 08:17:15

The kinder, gentler, sleeveless sweater clad Santorum no longer wants to send gay people to death camps, just to give them electro-convulsive therapy :)

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 09:56:56

Lou Reed’s parents did it to him 50 years ago as referenced in his song Kill Your Sons, a time in our history the current crop of “family values” candidates seem so keen on returning to…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 10:04:12

We must remain pure……. of evil thoughts according to the Family Values Purity Propaganda.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-01-04 01:47:12

AP
“…The Montana Supreme Court restored the state’s century-old ban on direct spending by corporations on political candidates or committees in a ruling Friday that interest groups say bucks a high-profile U.S. Supreme Court decision granting political speech rights to corporations…

A group seeking to undo the Citizens United decision lauded the Montana high court, with its co-founder saying it was a “huge victory for democracy.”

Repeal will take a Constitutional Amendment ratified by 2/3 of the states, “…but With this ruling, the Montana Supreme Court now sets up the first test case for the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its Citizens United decision, a decision which poses a direct and serious threat to our democracy,” John Bonifaz, of Free Speech For People, said in a statement.

-Matt Tabbai in Rolling Stone.

Comment by palmetto
2012-01-04 04:58:54

Thank you for the good news, hansen. I hope to see more and more states’ rights movements of this sort.

 
Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 06:26:35

“… bucks a high-profile U.S. Supreme Court decision …”

Good luck in making this stand.

Montana seems to be getting a bit uppity in that it is just a state.

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 09:18:16

My favorite bit of Montana uppity-ness…their HB 246 a couple of years ago that declared any firearms made in Montana that stayed within the state were not subject to Federal firearms laws. The firearm equivalent of a “reasonable and proper” speed limit. Unfortunately the unlimited speed limit didn’t survive extended contact with reality…not sure about the gun law.

Comment by SV guy
2012-01-04 10:42:49

“Unfortunately the unlimited speed limit didn’t survive extended contact with reality…not sure about the gun law.”

The Feds threatened to withhold highway monies if a speed limit wasn’t enacted. The state had no speed limit for a long time before that (and people didn’t die in droves).

The gun bill is a justified attack on the Feds use of the Commerce Clause to claim jurisdiction on everything under the sun. Guns are the object not the subject. Read the tenth amendment.

Most Montanan’s don’t like to be told what to do by a bunch of outsiders. One of the many reasons I will retire there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:01:11

“Most x50 _______________ don’t like to be told what to do by a bunch of outsiders.”

Let’s revisit some of our history lessons regarding ‘States” Rights! vs Federal Evil-doer’s”

“Thus children, it took Federal evil-doer agents to escort black students to certain Southern Colleges, oh, that was just so unjust!” ;-)

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 11:20:15

Most Montanan’s don’t like to be told what to do by a bunch of outsiders.

You’re preaching to the choir, I’m from Wyoming :-). I like it when Montana get uppity…

 
Comment by SV guy
2012-01-04 11:24:23

You really need to stop imbibing so early Hwy.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2012-01-04 09:04:16

ahansen, I love your use of the dot dot dot after the word “corporations.” The next two words were “and unions.” I can’t imagine why you left that out. :-)

Comment by Montana
2012-01-04 09:52:13

Unions, and the many nonprofit advocacy groups who contribute to campaigns.

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-01-04 11:16:11

inadvertent, Bill. Thanks for pointing it out.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 09:11:42

Keep an eye on Montana. Not just for this court decision, but on the health care reform front. The state’s governor, Brian Schweitzer, has been talking with the premier of Saskatchewan, Brad Wall.

And it seems that Montana and Saskatchewan have a lot in common. Similar age profiles of the populations. Similar occupations. Similar ethnic compositions.

However, the provincial health care bill for Saskatchewan is just half of what Montana’s is. Hmmm, wonder why that might be. It *could* have something to do with America’s highly inefficient and costly health care system, eh?

There have been rumors of some sort of statewide single payer system emerging, but nothing concrete yet. However, recall from Canadian history that the national system started as a provincial system in Saskatchewan under Premier Tommy Douglas, who was voted as the Greatest Canadian Ever in a recent CBC poll.

Comment by Montana
2012-01-04 10:04:03

Don’t believe it. Brian is just flapping his jaws and the lefty blogs are running with it.

Besides, I’d think he’d need the legislature for this, but he won’t be in office next session.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:03:23

How’s Montana’s state budget goin’ these days?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Montana
2012-01-04 14:26:33

We’re marinally in the black, but it’s debatable. We have a pretty wild oil estraction business going on in the far east of the state, which has been saving our bacon for a few years now.

Gov. BS is a lame duck governor, and can’t do much at this point.

 
 
 
Comment by seen it all
2012-01-04 13:59:16

I read about that (Canada’s first test of universal care).

The province had doctors from Britain on stand-by to come replace the provincial doctors who threatened to strike if the reforms were enacted.

 
 
Comment by whyoung
2012-01-04 10:45:57

A few weeks ago saw a pic of a protester carrying this sign that you all might enjoy:

“I’ll believe corporations are people when Florida executes one!”

Need a t-shirt of that one…

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:15:31

That’s harsh, eyes just wish they’d REVOKE x1 Mega CorpInc. Charter for Act$ unbecoming an American Patriot & Pattern$-of-really-really-bad-behavior$ :-)

 
Comment by seen it all
2012-01-04 14:00:42

“I’ll believe corporations are people when Florida executes one!”

+1,000
re: t-shirt (mug?) Have to work on that!

 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 04:36:24

.

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 06:06:25

+1

Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-01-04 06:07:58

+2

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 06:34:37

Hey GoonMan,

Shoot me an email. goonsquad@hushmail.me

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2012-01-04 04:53:39

Nowhere to Go, Patients Linger in Hospitals, at a High Cost
NYTimes

Hundreds of patients have been languishing for months or even years in New York City hospitals, despite being well enough to be sent home or to nursing centers for less-expensive care, because they are illegal immigrants or lack sufficient insurance or appropriate housing.

As a result, hospitals are absorbing the bill for millions of dollars in unreimbursed expenses annually while the patients, trapped in bureaucratic limbo, are sometimes deprived of services that could be provided elsewhere at a small fraction of the cost.

“Many of those individuals no longer need that care, but because they have no resources and many have no family here, we, unfortunately, are caring for them in a much more expensive setting than necessary based on their clinical need,” said LaRay Brown, a senior vice president for the city’s Health and Hospitals Corporation. Under state law, public hospitals are not allowed to discharge patients to shelters or to the street.

Medicaid often pays for emergency care for illegal immigrants, but not for continuing care, and many hospitals in places with large concentrations of illegal immigrants, like Texas, California and Florida, face the quandary of where to send patients well enough to leave. Officials in New York City say they have many such patients who are draining money from the health system as the cost of keeping people in acute-care hospitals continues to escalate.

Five years ago, Yu Kang Fu, 58, who lived in Flushing, Queens, and was a cook at a Chinese restaurant in New Jersey, was dropped off by his boss at New York Downtown Hospital, a private institution in Manhattan, complaining of a severe headache. Mr. Yu was admitted to the intensive-care unit with a stroke.

Within days, he was well enough for hospital personnel to begin planning for his release, but as an illegal immigrant (he had overstayed a work visa a decade ago), he was ineligible for health benefits. And no nursing home or rehabilitation center would take him. Neither would his son in China nor the Chinese government, although the hospital volunteered to fly him there at its expense.

Mr. Yu remained in the hospital for over four years until he was transferred last spring to the Atlantis Rehabilitation and Residential Health Care Facility, a private center in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, after the federal government certified him as a “permanent resident under color of law,” essentially acknowledging that he could not be returned to China and qualifying him for medical benefits.

“This gentleman cost us millions of dollars,” said Jeffrey Menkes, the president of New York Downtown. “We try to provide physical, occupational therapy, but this is an acute-care hospital. This patient shouldn’t be here.”

Mr. Yu said that the hospital had treated him well, but that he had made enormous progress in regaining his ability to walk through his rehabilitation regimen at Atlantis. He hopes to return to China when he is well enough to be discharged.

“Here, I am very happy,” he said. “This is very nice — No. 1.”

Health professionals refer to them as “permanent patients,” trussed in red tape and essentially living in hospitals already operating on thin margins. In some cases, health care professionals say, grown children leave ailing parents at the hospitals and go on vacation. Officials call that practice a “pop drop.”

Though the problem is particularly severe in the municipal hospital system, longtime patients place a financial burden wherever they end up.

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 08:08:01

So why don’t we throw them on a plane back to their country of origin when they get healthy enough to travel?

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 08:26:59

Probly cus there member of labor unions or sumthin…

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 09:28:36

…. you mean sumpin’…..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2012-01-04 10:21:36

That would be racist.

 
Comment by polly
2012-01-04 13:36:56

Because they aren’t healthy enough to travel, or at least not unless there is someone to at least meet them when they arrive.

Generally, hospitals are not allowed to discharge patients unless they have determined that the patient will be safe when they get where they are going. It isn’t a federal rule as far as I know, so likely state based (states license hospitals). Not hard to do if you have an indigent patient who is eligible for Medicaid and can be discharged to a crummy nursing home that will accept the Medicaid reimbursement. Or if the patient has local family that speak a language spoken by at least one of the hospital’s social workers so they can talk about whether the patient will be able to access a bed and a bathroom without having to climb two flights of stairs.

Now, if the patient is here illegally, they aren’t eligible for Medicaid. If there is no family (or the family stops visiting or answering the phone because they are all here illegally or just don’t want to take care of Uncle whoever) then you can’t talk to anyone about post hospital care.

The article states that their countries of origin refuse to accept responsibility. That has to change. It is time for someone from the state department to pay a visit to the required embassies and make a huge fuss. The states can’t do this on their own as they are not allowed to have their own foreign policies. Time for the feds to help them out.

Comment by Lenderoflastresort
2012-01-05 02:31:31

Maybe This is something that has to be changed, too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2012-01-04 04:56:57

“It’s not the people who vote that count. It’s the people who count the votes that matter.”

Joseph Stalin

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 08:17:45

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would
things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night
to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had
to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for
example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city,
people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every
bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had
understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the
downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers,
or whatever else was at hand? [...] The Organs would very quickly have
suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of
Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!”

The Gulag Archipelago, A. Solzhenitsyn. Chapter 1 “Arrest”, fn. 5.

Comment by Lenderoflastresort
2012-01-05 02:36:07

“The prerequisite of genocide is disarmament of the people.” I don’t remember who said it, but it seems true.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 09:40:09

“They” are listening…

 
Comment by measton
2012-01-04 12:23:41

Joseph Stalin

I thought it was Diebold??

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 13:31:45

Sour grapes liberal bedwetters just can’t get over that one *sigh*

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 06:05:06

In my base search area 33458 there are 329 Listings Found. That`s down 130 - 150 from recent times and dropping like a rock.

All hail the Great Bernanke! HAMP, HARP, HOBO, Robo, Deadbeat, Wall Street, First time loan tryers, Mers, Mars, electric cars……

http://www.usadebtclock.com/ - 18k -

and the rent goes on……

Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 06:26:42

Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Person $394,090.50

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:22:38

War/ Nation Building x many,… is expen$ive.

$hould we $low down or $top? ;-)

(wink to my departed storytelling Uncle in Kansas)

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 13:35:18

War on the middle class: Cost?

War on the rest of the globe: Cost?

War on drugs: Cost?

War on savers: Cost?

Why must we engage in organized violence? Oh that’s right. It says so in the bible. Right? RIGHT?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by seen it all
2012-01-04 15:38:09

It says so in the bible. Right? RIGHT?

Gotta citation ? Not that I don’t believe you, just wonderin ‘ if there is a specific admonition to overthrow.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 17:20:53

Oh… I forgot. It’s just “Onward Christian Soldiers”.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-01-04 06:06:19

Sounds like they’re battening down the hatches in the Middle Kingdom. Do they see a storm ahead?

China campaign cuts entertainment TV by two-thirds
BBCNews

Satellite broadcasters in China have cut entertainment TV by two-thirds following a government campaign, state news agency Xinhua has reported.

The number of entertainment shows aired during prime time each week has dropped to 38 from 126, said the watchdog.

The news came as the president warned of the influence of Western culture.

In the piece published in a Communist Party magazine, President Hu Jintao also urged efforts to boost the country’s own soft power, said Xinhua.

Satellite channels have started to broadcast programmes that promote traditional virtues and socialist core values,” SARFT said in a statement.

Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 06:14:18

“In the piece published in a Communist Party magazine, President Hu Jintao also urged efforts to boost the country’s own soft power, sid Xinhua.”

“Soft power”?

This guy certainly has good sense of humor.

 
Comment by turkey lureky
2012-01-04 08:51:00

“In the piece published in a Communist Party magazine, President Hu Jintao also urged efforts to boost the country’s own soft power, said Xinhua.

Satellite channels have started to broadcast programmes that promote traditional virtues and socialist core values,””

Here we go again.

Note how they equate communist and socialist in the same article.

Comment by Steve W
2012-01-04 09:41:00

Does Directv-China also broadcast the Two Minute Hate?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:32:05

:-)

Glenn Beck’s BUY GOLD! BUY GOLD! BUY GOLD! ad’s were a hit!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by BlueStar
2012-01-04 12:12:22

Our TV is a toxic wasteland. I watch C-SPAN, PBS, NatGeo and few network news channels and maybe SyFy or the History channel if I want ‘entertainment’. TV in America is the main tool used to effect Behavioral Economics.

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 06:40:58

Breaking news: Those millions of dead bees we heard about several years ago weren’t raptured, they were turned into zombies.

http://news.yahoo.com/zombie-fly-parasite-killing-honeybees-230200867.html

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 06:50:49

Those same flies apparently infested 95% of the US electorate (the Obama Zombies & McCain Mutants of ‘08).

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:35:52

Obama Zombies

Hey all that’s left in a cave somewhere in Iraq is:

“Killjoy was here” aka: Lil’ Opie

Got my votes worth! :-)

Peace

 
 
Comment by turkey lureky
2012-01-04 08:56:53

Just saw that this morning as well.

 
Comment by turkey lureky
2012-01-04 08:59:22

Shouldn’t that be “zom-bees?”

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 09:22:31

Sounds like a good idea for a video game.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 06:43:35

This article is a month-and-a-half old, but it nonetheless seems to contribute plenty of gloom to the economic outlook for the New Year. All the monetary machinations in the world may fail to save the planet from the real economic consequences of an epic housing bubble.

Finance
Two views of the future
The markets will reveal which is right
Nov 17th 2011 | from The World In 2012 print edition

Somebody is going to be proved wrong in 2012 and will lose a lot of money. Either the bullion market or the Treasury bond market is mistaken about the long-term inflationary outlook.

By early September 2011, gold was trading at around $1,900 an ounce, an indication that investors felt inflation was set to soar. Such an outlook would normally be bad news for government-bond markets. But the ten-year Treasury bond was simultaneously yielding less than 2%, an indication that the “bond vigilantes” were far more concerned about deflation than inflation. Although the gold price fell and bond yields rose in October, the underlying contradiction didn’t disappear.

Such historically low bond yields might seem a very bad bargain indeed. But investors have the example of Japan to ponder. Many years of fiscal deficits, a high debt-to-GDP ratio, low interest rates and quantitative easing (QE): Japan has tried the lot without escaping from its economic doldrums. By September 2011 its ten-year bond yield had slipped below 1%.

If the rich world is following Japan’s template, equity markets are likely to have a rough 2012. A year in which Treasury bond yields stay at 2% or below would probably be one in which America at least flirted with recession. But equity investors are unlikely to be much happier if the gold bugs turn out to be right. Although shares may be a better hedge against inflation than government bonds, they are still prone to suffer if prices rise sharply, as they did in the 1970s. Equity valuations, as measured by the price-earnings ratio, tend to be highest when inflation is low and stable. Furthermore, a sharp rise in inflation would probably force the Federal Reserve to abandon its commitment to keep interest rates at their current low levels. That commitment is itself a sign of the Fed’s worries about the economic outlook.

Indeed, unlike 2008 or 2009, the equity markets may not get much of a hand from the authorities in 2012, since policymakers seem to have run out of ammunition. Interest rates are about as low as they can go, while debt-burdened governments are opting for austerity rather than further pump-priming. Europe’s travails weighed on investors’ minds throughout 2011, as politicians looked for a way to deal with the high debts incurred in Greece and other countries.

There is always the hope of further QE, with the central bank creating money to buy financial assets. But the policy has become controversial, with Texas’s governor, Rick Perry, a candidate for the Republican nomination for the American presidency, describing the idea as “almost treasonous”. Nor is it clear that previous rounds of QE did much to help the real economy.

Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 06:52:44

“E

Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 06:58:42

Ooops.

“Equity valuations, as measured by the price-earnings ratio, tend to be highest when inflation is low and stable.”

In normal times. In abnormal times such as today this “low and stable” inflation rate also means low returns for investors.

Investors that depend on higher returns are going to have to dig into principle, and digging into principle means selling assets.

Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:08:47

Corollary: Selling assets to raise cash in hard times means lower valuations for the assets that get sold.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 07:19:55

Thanks, PB. That’s, uh, my point.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:39:56

I figure it never hurts to hammer home a good point in the era of bald-faced lies, truthiness and cluelessness.

 
Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 07:45:10

If one HAS to sell because he NEEDS the money then he needs to hook up with somebody who WANTS to buy and HAS the money.

In such an arrangement guess who it is that gets to set the price?

 
Comment by Rancher
2012-01-04 08:22:57

You’re assuming both the seller and the buyer
knows this..? How good of a poker player are you?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 09:21:56

“You’re assuming both the seller and the buyer
knows this..?”

Not necessarily. It is also possible the buyer faces a budget constraint that the seller is unwilling to meet. See my other posts on this thread regarding the North County San Diego housing market for evidence on the result, which is a dearth of trades.

 
Comment by cactus
2012-01-04 14:21:38

Sometimes prices go up in a bad economy

Limited Inventory
A depleted inventory of used cars is likely to continue for at least three more years, perhaps longer if the economy remains stagnant. If the economy rebounds, people may find themselves in a better position to buy new, reducing the demand for used cars and sending prices downward as inventory expands. Until then, expect to remain in a perpetual state of shock when shopping for a used car, no matter how old and decrepit the vehicle may be.

Automotive News notes that prices for some used cars are not far off the sticker price for new cars, even though the comparison is between cars that are three years old and those that are new.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 15:02:07

Yeah, sucks for me…normally I’d be driving something cool right now, but I’m driving my wife’s old minivan for now. I refuse to pay through the nose for a used car, and I refuse to pay new car prices for anything I’d actually want. If the van dies I’m not sure if I’ll buy another beater to continue the waiting game, or what.

 
Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 15:08:15

I refuse to pay through the nose for a used car,

My girlfriend recently totalled her car (didn’t have collision insurance, of course. Grumble…) It was enlightening to see the used cars that are available for sale these days and the high prices. Not a chance of finding a decent, reliable car for $5k with less than 100k miles.

She ended up buying a Honda Civic with 144k on it. Runs great, but I believe she paid about $7k for it. Crazy.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 15:17:07

Yeah, that IS crazy.

 
Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 15:37:23

Yeah, that IS crazy.

Yes, but it was the best option of any I saw or heard that she looked at. Most had pretty serious issues (one car we test drove had the turn signals stop working as soon as we pulled off the lot. Not just a burnt out light, but the whole circuit seemed to go down).

If she had let me do the negotiating (or listened to my advice) I’m sure she could have gotten it for $6k or so, but it’s her money, right? ;)

 
Comment by polly
2012-01-04 15:51:20

My mother can’t understand why I am so eager to buy their Civic off them when dad treats himself to a new car for his next “big” birhtday. It will have about 110K miles on it, and I sincerely doubt they will let me pay more than $3K. Perfectly maintained and garage parked.

I’m going to buy them Acela tickets to get home when they bring it down so they can try out the train for distance travel. I’ll even slip the sky cap a $20 to take care of them. I want that car.

 
Comment by Moman
2012-01-04 16:08:03

Honda and Toyota values are way overrated. I’ve had four GM cars goes to near 200k without issues.

Ened up buying a brand new GM a couple months ago, due to the low difference between used and new. I guess some poeple just can’t fathom buying a new car, even if the difference is 2k.

 
Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 16:18:46

I guess some poeple just can’t fathom buying a new car, even if the difference is 2k

I ended up buying a new Subaru for the same reason. My Toyota (’99 4Runner 4×4) is still going strong with 197k miles, but I’ve been having foot problems so need an automatic rather than driving the stiff clutch of the 4runner. Anyway, I digress.

Was looking at used cars and honestly the price difference between a 1-2 year old car and a new one was negligible. So, even though I set out saying I would absolutely buy used, I ended up buying new off the lot without having to haggle at all on price (salesman offered his lowest price over email, which beat everyone else I had talked to).

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 16:41:26

Honda and Toyota values are way overrated. I’ve had four GM cars goes to near 200k without issues.

Let’s not have everyone faint all at once, but here goes. Arizona Slim is about to say something good about an auto manufacturer. Specifically, GM.

While it’s easy to bash GM, and oh, it sure has provided plenty of reasons in the past, I think this company is making a very impressive turnaround. Good on ‘em.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 16:48:17

I think domestic reliability is good if my parent’s cars are typical. People are probably being lazy if the say “reliability”…because I bet they’re really complaining about design or materials. That’s what seems to be lacking to me in most domestics. That’s not to say I’ve been happy with all the imports either, but it’s hard to beat most of the Civics I’ve been in for the price. But I haven’t been in a brand new one for a few years, so my view could be outdated.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 17:42:20

Thanks for the used car vs. new car thread y’all. My Volvo hit 302,000 so I’ll be replacing her in the next year or two. I was thinking of another Volvo (used this time) until the EVs are up to par.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:43:08

“as measured by the price-earnings ratio”

Dark Ages:
x1 income = $helter

Enlightened Era:
x2 income$ = $helter

Like some cars on the Res…”no reverse!” doesn’t mean you can’t go somewhere.

;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:46:04

The MSM is brimming with dire financial predictions for 2012.

Jan. 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EST
Why you will fail in 2012
By John Nyaradi

January is the time for stock market forecasting and predictions, and all over the financial media, pundits and analysts are offering up their forecasts for 2012.

Of course, all of this is nonsense because no one has a crystal ball and no one can predict the future. Some of our “financial Merlins” will get lucky peering into their goat entrails and guess the future correctly, but most will fail. However, sadly, one prediction that almost certainly will come true is that most investors/traders will fail in 2012, not because they lack an accurate crystal ball but because they lack the skills, training and systems necessary for success in today’s challenging environment.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 07:02:01

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=200045

Analysts’ failure to foresee declining earnings per share for the biggest U.S. banks last year hasn’t stopped them from predicting an even bigger profit surge for 2012.

The six largest lenders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Bank of America Corp. (BAC) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), may post an average profit increase of 57 percent this year, according to 184 analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. A year ago, analysts predicted profit at the banks would climb 32 percent in 2011. Instead, earnings per share probably fell 18 percent as the economic recovery analysts counted on never took hold.

Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 07:15:09

Lol. With today’s accounting standards (”standards” = a word that may mean something different than what you think it means) Bank “earnings” can be whatever a bank wants them to be.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:15:50

I’m guessing it will be another good year for the dollar, and a poor one for members of the global Megabank cartel. Volatility will continue to rattle those who used to believe “the stock market always goes up.” And a QE3 announcement or other new banking bailout measures could easily throw a wrench into this mindless prediction.

GLOBAL MARKETS-Bank worries hit world stocks, dollar rises

Analysis & Opinion
Investment banking dreams may die in 2012
Where will the ECB’s billions go?

Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:41am EST

* Deeply discounted UniCredit rights issue weighs

* German debt auction unimpressive

* Dollar gains on stock selloff

By Richard Hubbard

LONDON, Jan 4 (Reuters) - Worries over the euro zone debt crisis and the region’s banks hit global stocks and boosted the dollar on Wednesday after Italian lender UniCredit priced a rights issue at a huge discount and a German bond auction failed to impress.

U.S. stock index futures pointed to weaker open on Wall Street on euro zone concerns after a strong rally in the previous session.

The U.S. dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of currencies, gained 0.6 percent to 80.10 points.

Banking sector fears were ignited by news UniCredit had launched a 7.5 billion euro ($9.8 billion) two-for-one rights issue at a discount of 69 percent to its closing share price on Tuesday.

The capital increase, meant to shore up its ravaged balance sheet, sent shares in Italy’s largest bank by assets down 8.5 percent.

Comment by combotechie
2012-01-04 07:37:59

“Bank worries hit world stocks.”

What Monday giveth, Tuesday taketh back.

Churn ‘em and burn ‘em. Suck them in one day, shake them out the next.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:52:51

no worries, any.day.now. there’s gonna be a “rat-chewed-a-data-cable!” moment, er, eyes mean: comet … dangs it: comment (or “public statement” iffin’s you prefer) ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:49:03

Extra! Extra!: “U$D & America [U$A] nation & peoples this close [..] to total & complete financial implo$ion!

Ask any “do-nothing” / “budget-as-ho$tage” in Congress. ;-)

 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 07:03:47

So we’re good for another year?

Newly Discovered Mayan Calendar Suggests One-Year Reprieve
Guatemala City British Community Connexion, Jan 2, 2012. Neelan Abercrombie

Guatemala City BCC: A recently unearthed Mayan calendar is giving end-of-the-world prognosticators new hope for at least a one-year extension of time. Previous versions of the Mayan calendar had pegged 2012 as the year the world ends or as known in the Spanish speaking academic world as the “Esta Mierda ha Terminado.” event. However the newly found calendar points to 2013 as the possible nellykracker.

The small, reddish colour, stone calendar is believed to come from the Late Classic Maya period of 600-900 AD where such type calendars were thought to have been given away by trading, political or religious entities to express thanks or engender goodwill towards patrons or supporters.

The calendar was discouvered in the Chimpiqua slum Bolas de la Mulas in 2008 by Eduardo “Fingers” De La Guardia. (pictured left in Lakers jumper) Of all things, Mr. De La Guardia was digging a privy hole in his front yard when his spade unearthed the calendar. (translated from Spanish) “I was digging a bloody hole for my loo in my front yard and I hit the thing with my spade” De La Guardia excitedly describes in a quiet monotone. “We didn’t know what it was but the size was good” adding that the calendar served as the privy hole cover for 2 years before being nicked in 2010. Eventually ending up in the Chimpiqua City Market, the calendar was re-discouvered in June 2011 by Chimpiqua history professor Juan Garcia “Buzz” Ortega. “I thought it was one of those head busting Frisbees used by the sierra gauchos. They play wild drinking games when away from their birds” Ortega explained with a toothy grin. “But then I noticed the Mayan characters in the centre and knew what it meant. I had discovered an authentic Calendero de Mayan….. I prayed to the Virgin of my country.” Buzz Ortega sobbed.

Although a very rare find in itself, the now famous Bolas de la Mulas Calendar soon proved to be quite different. On September 24, the tenth and final day of the Asno de los Cerdos holiday, Buzz Ortega and his neighbour and mate were using the calendar playing Perra, No lo Rompa the traditional, heads-or-tails drinking game played in the sand usually with the family’s best dinner plate. Both men disagree exactly when (being quite dillywompered at the time) but on about the 10th occasion the calendar landed upside down Mr. Ortega noticed faint markings on the back of the calendar. “I thought I’d turned barmy but it turned out to be 2013.” “Buzz” Ortega chortled, adding “Blimey! The bloody extra year! Just like modern calendars give us an extra month – my 2011 calendar lists January 2012 as a bonus. Well this is the 2013 Mayan calendar bonus. It is brilliant”!

But not only did the Bolas de la Mulas Calendar give the extra 2013-year, it was soon discovered that the extra year before the world began was included in the markings. Beginning as -00/-00/-01 this newly designated year might prove to be an even more important banger discovery in the years ahead. (If there are any) This is because scientists and historians have been at bollyknockers for decades on the organization of time before time existed. Indeed.

For historians, the calendar is the dog’s bollocks because the Bolas de la Mulas Calendar clearly indicates that months, days and years existed in structure even before they existed in reality. This has given the historians a smashing edge over the scientists in the debate going forward or at least until the now postponed 2013 “Esta Mierda ha Terminado.” event. An extra year for he world? Perhaps. A brilliant discovery for the world at large? Quite.

Postscript: The Bolas de la Mulas Calendar has been moved to the Guatemalan National University for further study. Eduardo “Fingers” De La Guardia has been given a duplicate of the Bolas de la Mulas Calendar along with a Guatemalan official Certificate of High Standing, Juan Garcia “Buzz” Ortega was named Chimpiqua middle-school 2011 teacher of the year and was awarded the Guatemalan National Medal of Substantial Things on December 12, 2011.

Neelan Abercrombie is an English haberdasher and tailor of bespoken suits in Guatemala City, the President of the Guatemala/Honduras English Culinary Assn., an avid cat lover and a frequent contributor of the Guatemala City British Community Connexion.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 11:55:50

Eyes was sweatin’ missing out on taking Mr. Cole to the Gettysburg-Richmond tree recognition tour.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-01-04 13:24:09

A recently unearthed Mayan calendar is giving end-of-the-world prognosticators new hope for at least a one-year extension of time

It’s a scam by the banksters and the other PTB to keep everyone hanging in there. Don’t run on the bank until 2013! Keep paying your mortgage another year.

The end has been postponed. Carry on.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 07:05:05

Bank of America short-sale incentives draw mixed reviews

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Updated: 7:19 p.m. Sunday, Jan. 1, 2012
Posted: 6:18 p.m. Sunday, Jan. 1, 2012

COMMENTS

No clients have received incentives yet, 1 client in Tampa received a written offer. So, how many homeowners actually participatated? How many actually received the incentive? Mrs. Miller, I think you need to do a little deeper investigation and come up with figures. I think I will be one of the ones that ride it out, 41 months and my foreclosure was dismissed by the bank. I think I will be alright for another 24 months if not more.
diver4life
8:45 PM, 1/1/2012

Banks cannot prove they own the loan, so they are trying to Bribe the homeowner into submission. Facts are the Banks are losing at trial, not Summary Judgment when a good law firm defends the case. The banks deserve to lose, next time maybe they will follow the law and not try to commit fraud for a quick buck.
The Truth
8:13 PM, 1/1/2012

As I’ve posted before, we have not paid our mortgage in over 2 years and nothings been done about it. Our mortgage payment was over $2000 per month. Do the math. We have saved over $50,000 over the last 2 years. Cash is tucked away safely for our future use. We felt guilty at first but NOT ANYMORE. I would encourage everybody to do the same. Screw the bankers.
Free Ride
9:49 AM, 1/2/2012

@freeride

Great job !…get the word out to everyone, eventually those who bad mouth you, will see the light !….do not ever walk away, everyone must fight back and then we will win against the evil that caused this
javagold
12:13 PM, 1/2/2012

Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-01-04 07:28:43

“Banks cannot prove they own the loan, so they are trying to Bribe the homeowner into submission.”

Sometimes I wonder if the proof of ownership of pretty much all the loans made during the biggest boom years might be inadmissible in a court of law, and another of the ‘beneficial’ byproducts of the extended low interest rate period is to get everyone who isn’t totally underwater to refi into mortgages whose chain of ownership can be proved legally.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-01-04 07:21:12

In the Financial Times, Alan Greenspan, the man who chaired the commission that jacked up payroll taxes on workers to “Save Social Security” in 1982 and claimed that the U.S. could afford huge income tax cuts for the wealthy in 2001 now says the U.S. cannot afford senior benefits. For younger generations.

But that’s fair, he implies, since the Baby Boomers were the most productive workers in U.S. history whereas those coming after are less deserving.

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 07:56:39

Alan Greenspan should be caned.

 
Comment by Steve W
2012-01-04 08:10:44

I hope and pray that no one is listening to this jerk anymore. I think that article just burst an aneurysm in my brain.

Comment by rms
2012-01-04 08:21:44

I hope and pray that no one is listening to this jerk anymore.

Unfortunately they are paying $1,000+ per plate for the privilege of listening to him in the flesh. I wonder if he speaks plainly to his paying audience?

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-01-04 08:11:18

The Wikipedia entry on Greenspan includes a section on criticisms of his policies and does not even mention the 1982 Commission and its aftermath. The Generational Betrayal. Predictably, neither does Greenspan.

Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 09:26:22

Monday, January 02, 2012 9:58:13 AM
Opinion: Social Insecurity, or “Honey I Shrunk The Kids’ Wealth”

Arun Muralidhar: As much as I enjoy my taxes being cut, one has to look at the consequences of these decisions and, sadly, I have to be a really negligent father to be excited by these cuts.

“Not only it’s not right, it’s not even wrong.” Wolfgang Ernst Pauli

Maybe Wolfgang Paul was being prescient in commenting on the moves by Congress to use the Social Security payroll tax cut to stimulate the economy for a second year running. A more easily recognizable analogy would be “stealing from Peter to pay Paul.” As much as I enjoy my taxes being cut, one has to look at the consequences of these decisions and sadly I have to be a really negligent father to be excited by these cuts.

Social Security is a mandatory (with some exceptions) defined benefit pension plan and pays citizens who participate for a minimum number of years a pension, through death with some survivor benefits, based on average lifetime income. It is one part pension system and one part wealth redistribution as low-income earners get a slightly higher pension replacement rate than higher earners. Because the first generation of retirees were paid a pension without ever having contributed (lending some credence to Rick Perry’s Ponzi scheme quote), the funding principle underlying Social Security is termed “Pay-As-You-Go” or PAYGO. For such a system to work efficiently, the commitment every future generation is making to the previous generation is to produce more children (so that more folks are taxed) and/or grow the economy, especially as life expectancy increases. Social Security is not a pure PAYO because in the 1980s, Alan Greenspan headed a commission that recognized that this social contract was being violated, raised the payroll tax to the current rate of 12.4% and all excess contributions over pensions were placed in a “Trust Fund” that would earn an artificial rate of interest. Unlike a typical corporate or public pension plan, this Trust Fund was not segregated from the US Government’s other revenues and were plundered to finance budget deficits under the Reagan Administration (leading George W Bush to make the accusation that Social Security did not have assets but just some IOUs).

Comment by Steve J
2012-01-04 10:26:16

Everyone I know under 50 has never planned on Social Security being there when they retire.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 10:37:12

Well, lookie here. The financial industry’s propaganda ministry has done its job well. The young ‘uns have been brainwashed into the Disappearing Social Security Cult.

Nice job, financial industry. You deserve our undying praise for your selfless service.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 11:09:11

Everyone I know under 50 has never planned on Social Security being there when they retire.

You don’t know me.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-01-04 11:18:16

Is that why they saved so much money out of their much lower incomes? I did. But if they cut the benefits in half by means testing for those under 55, but not 55 and over, I’m thus screwed. And so is anyone else who saved. All three of them.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-01-04 11:48:32

“Everyone I know under 50 has never planned on Social Security being there when they retire.”

It’s gonna be there, but it’s not going to amount to much compared to what they paid in.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:00:31

“Because the first generation of retirees were paid a pension without ever having contributed”

Define: “Contributed”?

Always the focu$ is on the tangible$ in the ledger, alway$

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2012-01-04 07:22:27

I would love a gander at this place…

None of the Chinese developers who built the vacation resort named Jackson Hole, in Hebei Province, had ever been to Wyoming.

“They absolutely fell in love with the idea of anything cowboy and Indian,” Smith said. “It just took off.”

The developers bought stock Western home plans from an architect in Oregon. Smith created an identity for each themed house within the 850-home development: Billy the Kid, Geronimo, Stagecoach Station, Betsy, Big Bear, etc.

Prospective buyers took the two-hour bus rides north of Beijing to see the site before signing contracts.

The homes in Jackson Hole, China, have sold out and nearly tripled in value since being built, Smith said.

http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/article.php?art_id=8100

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:11:53

“the idea of anything cowboy and Indian”

Hey Losty, load up the raft & get ready, they’re a comin’, in drove$! ;-)

 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 07:25:32

Housing’s Huge Supply and Demand Imbalance
http://www.cnbc.com/id/45858675?__source=RSS*blog*&par=RSS
Ivy Zelman-now a bull and Laurie Goodman-the realist are quoted.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:30:14

My impression that the North County San Diego real estate market was dead this year was not imaginary.

HOUSING: Fewest house sales in North County since 1991
By ERIC WOLFF ewolff@nctimes.com |
Posted: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:00 pm

Century 21 real estate agent Jack Pope sits in a big office in Oceanside with empty desks Friday. Pope hopes that 2012 will be a better year for home sales. JAMIE SCOTT LYTLE | lytle@nctimes.com

North San Diego County will see fewer houses sold in 2011 than it has since 1991, according to a North County Times analysis of transactions from the San Diego County Assessor’s office.

That’s 12 percent fewer houses sold than in 2008, when house prices went into free fall, and just 81 sales more than in 1991, when financial havoc caused by the imploding savings and loan industry depressed house sales.

In Temecula and Murrieta, house sales were down 7 percent from 2010, but fared less poorly, according to the Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors.

The real estate market found itself caught in a pincers of uncertainty among buyers and sellers: People who might wish to sell their homes lost too much value since they bought them, and many can’t pay off their loans; while people looking to buy a house struggle to get home loans from tight-fisted banks. The result has been the slowest year for house sales in two decades in North County.

“There’s two fence-sitters, the buyers and the sellers,” said Jack Pope, an Oceanside Realtor with 21 years in the business. “The buyers are sitting on the fence thinking it’s (the price) still going down; the sellers are waiting to be close to having some equity.”

With 2011 not quite completely on the books, North County projects to have 8,140 house sales by the end of the year, down 15 percent from 2010, according to a North County Times tally of house sales through November, and a projection for December.

San Diego County will see the same trend: The county reassessed 54,500 properties countywide because of change of ownership in 2011, fewer than in the past four years, themselves part of a housing bust, said Jeff Olson, division chief for the San Diego County Assessor.

Related Stories
HOUSING: Lack of move-up buyers holding back house prices
HOUSING: Unpredictable mortgage approvals frustrate buyers, drag down market
HOUSING: San Diego County homeowners deeper underwater, Riverside-San Bernardino improving
HOUSING: Prices collapsing in senior communities

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:17:09

Related Stories:

1. Job$! Job$! Job$!
2. Family income = x2 (a theory based on e$crow intial$)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 07:37:23

Wouldn’t it be smarter for a prospective buyer to just keep renting until home prices reach a stable bottom, rather than trying to “win” a decent used home sale price from a deluded seller?

HOUSING: Berg: A house purchase is not a zero sum game

By ERIC WOLFF ewolff@nctimes.com | Posted: Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:30 am

Nearly every month, I hear from a real estate agent kvetching about how either prospective buyers will only take “smoking deals” or how sellers cling to prices above the norms of the market —- or both. In a recent blog post at her San Diego Home Blog, Rancho Bernardo Realtor Kris Berg says both sides need to stop trying to “win” a house purchase. She writes:

As a buyer, then, prices are what they are - today. That’s not to say that there isn’t room to negotiate. Of course there is. Depending on the seller’s needs and motivation, certain terms (like timing, financing and all those little contingency sticking points) may have value to the seller and may translate to a lower price. But it’s still not a zero sum game. There is give and take and, hopefully, a lot of what we call “dealing in good faith.” In most successful transactions, both parties ultimately benefit.

I see too many buyers playing to beat the seller instead of playing for a personal best. They take the asking price and offer 10 or 20% less, not because this seems like a fair price, but because it seems like a victory. Much like the sellers whose homes have languished on the market for too long, these buyers languish in the market for too long, firing too many blanks and missing too many opportunities.

Related Stories
HOUSING: San Diego County house prices down in October, Case-Shiller says
HOUSING: Local home prices decline with temperatures

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 07:49:47

“Much like the sellers whose homes have languished on the market for too long, these buyers languish in the market for too long, firing too many blanks and missing too many opportunities.

There’s that code language again. “Opportunity”, “buyers market”, “stabilize”. All reaItor code words to misrepresent the truth about prices.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-01-04 11:46:39

“Opportunity” = chance to lose lots of money

“buyers market” = nobody in their right mind would buy now, which leaves few buyers

“stabilize” = temporary government-sponsored price support

Are there any other weasel words which need their definitions clarified?

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 12:00:05

Correction: “Stabilize”= Prices are falling.

(one must remember the inversions and apply the same rule all conditions)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Pete
2012-01-04 12:49:44

“nobody in their right mind would buy now, which leaves few buyers”

Its been widely and confidently expressed on this board that what you just described is actually the best time to buy. “Buy when no one else is buying” I think is how it’s been stated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-01-04 14:45:06

“Nobody in their right mind” and “nobody” leaves a huge gap.

 
Comment by Pete
2012-01-04 17:22:07

” ‘Nobody in their right mind’ and ‘nobody’ leaves a huge gap.”

Oh yeah. Oops.

 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 08:12:56

Nothing about taking care of the squirrels?

PS – If you price a house correctly – you will get multiple offers…

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-01-04 11:44:33

I don’t know how North County San Diego home sellers manage to perpetually miss this simple bit of market insight.

Comment by Avocado
2012-01-04 13:59:50

I am looking at Vista. Is it full of gang bangers? Is the traffic horrible to get to the beach or SD?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 14:14:23

For a moment, I thought you were talking about Windows Vista.

 
Comment by cactus
2012-01-04 14:36:19

I am looking at Vista. Is it full of gang bangers?”

Look at the school scorces at “great schools dot com”

then you tell me if not gang bangers then what ? just a bunch of nices kids getting free lunches and 40 % on tests ?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 19:54:40

“Is it full of gang bangers? Is the traffic horrible to get to the beach or SD?”

Yes, no, yes.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:22:13

“both parties ultimately benefit.”

Eyes in a conundrum, where does this get edited in?:

Realtors Are Liars®

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 13:03:20

ReaItors are what?

 
 
 
Comment by Seen it all
2012-01-04 07:48:42

There’s something happening here.
What it is ain’t exactly clear.
There’s Sarah with a gun over there,
Telling me I got to beware.
I think it’s time we stop, children, what’s that sound?
Everybody look what’s going down.

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 08:15:41

The ObamaPureThoughts Committee has requested you report to re-education camp #546.

Failure to comply will result in arrest/imprisonment without charges or trail.

We thank you for your support for hope and change.

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 09:30:31

Recent news stories regarding record gun sales in 2011, and that 12/23 was the highest number of gun-purchase background checks for a single day.

See also post from 2012 predictions thread: “Anger, lots of anger”

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 11:58:39

Who do you think is buying?

Hint: It is not the “save the earth, give peace a chance, hope and change, government is the answer, where is my government cheese” type people…

Recent news stories regarding record gun sales in 2011, and that 12/23 was the highest number of gun-purchase background checks for a single day.

See also post from 2012 predictions thread: “Anger, lots of anger”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 13:26:21

A couple of statistics come to mind:

1. In the United States, most gun sales are made to people who already own guns.

2. Since the 1970s, the rate of household gun ownership has been declining. Back in the 1970s, slightly more than 50% of American households had guns. It’s now down to about 33%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 13:46:50

2. Since the 1970s, the rate of household gun ownership has been declining. Back in the 1970s, slightly more than 50% of American households had guns. It’s now down to about 33%.

I do not think by choice.

Places like NJ, NYC, CA etc. since the 1970s have made it much harder for law abiding citizens to own guns.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by turkey lureky
2012-01-04 09:10:07

No posts for me today?

Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 09:32:42

Just to fix the spelling of your name, please.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-01-04 09:43:22

:lol: I clear the cache every day and it also clears my sig.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 09:53:37

You’ll go blind… :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:23:44

Ha!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2012-01-04 09:11:30

“Third banker pleads guilty in huge Sarasota flipping fraud case”

The banker’s last name is Bangasser. LOL!

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20120103/ARTICLE/120109903/2416/NEWS?Title=Third-banker-pleads-guilty-in-huge-Sarasota-flipping-fraud-case

Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 09:27:35

“Bangasser”

Is that a German name?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-01-04 10:46:26

Wife’s name Amanda?

2012-01-04 18:57:16

Ivana Bangasser!

Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 19:55:58

Iva Nevabenna Bangasser.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 09:25:09

Carl Morris…. I saw your response to my personal retirement plan. Hilarious dude!

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 09:43:59

I had to go back and look it up, but yeah, we can trade off if you get tired of the grocery entrance. You don’t have to tag as many returns there but you have to deal with the grumpy old ladies. We can have electric scooter races after closing…

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 09:53:54

Yes…. we can race back to the RV park after our 12 hour shift.

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 10:04:10

Hey, and if we charge them at work that’s one less expense…although the RV park probably has some unguarded plugs we could snag. Or what the heck, power might even be included in the lot rent. If we work the system right we could probably even snag a couple of expired steaks on the way out and live it up back at the trailers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 10:31:50

…..ahhh… the savory smell of expired mystery meat in retirement…….. shangri-la.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 11:22:08

Get the coals good and hot and it’s all good.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 09:28:31

Yes! 5-10% is “in the bag” because the poll says it’s different here.

http://www.brecorder.com/business-a-economy/single/672/189/1265583/

Brazil’s property bubble should avoid bursting in 2012, a Reuters poll showed on Friday, forecasting real estate prices in Latin America’s largest economy would increase modestly after years of stellar rises.

The poll of 15 banks, research groups and business associations, taken over the past week, downplayed the risk of a sharp downturn, with a recent credit boom underpinned by a steady improvement in wages and affordability conditions.

The rapidly expanding Brazilian middle class is expected to keep a close eye on opportunities to stop renting and move into ownership, holding up prices even after they almost doubled in some neighbourhoods.

“When the slums disappear and the Brazilian housing sector gets more mature, then prices will stop rising,” said Andre Perfeito, chief economist at Gradual Investimentos brokerage.

…”There are structural factors in place to justify such a strong performance”

Brazilian home prices should rise between 5 and 10 percent in 2012, according to nine of 14 forecasts in the Reuters poll, with one analyst saying there would be a lesser rise.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 10:08:35

On a sadder note:

Michele Bachmann quits presidential race following poor showing in Iowa

AP WEST DES MOINES, Iowa–Michele Bachmann announced her exit from the presidential race Wednesday morning following a sixth-place finish in the first-in-the-nation caucus state of Iowa.

“Last night, the people of Iowa spoke with a very clear voice. And so I have decided to stand aside,” the Republican representative from Minnesota told reporters during a morning media availability here at the Marriott hotel.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 10:19:35

The mental institution found their missing patient.

Comment by sfrenter
2012-01-04 14:16:24

The mental institution found their missing patient.

And not a minute too soon. Man o man that lady is nutso.

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 10:38:51

Thus ends the free entertainment… :-(

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 10:38:55

This just in from the Bachmann campaign HQ:

Don’t worry, America. I’ll find a way to keep myself in the spotlight for the remainder of my days on earth. Because being the center of attention is so much fun.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 10:47:36

God told her run for President and now she quits? So much for her faith and obedience to God.

Comment by Michael Viking
2012-01-04 11:14:03

God changed his mind. It happens.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 11:25:31

You’re right. And the world thanks him this time. bwhahaha

 
 
 
Comment by whyoung
2012-01-04 10:53:57

And because I can make a lot of money having a book ghostwritten and going on the talk show/banquet speech gravy train.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:27:45

Sounds like that was plagiarized from “$arah-the-Barracude$$”

ding-ding rhymes with Ka-ching!

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-01-04 10:48:23

At least I’ll always have her Newsweek cover to make these long winter nights less lonely *sigh*

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 11:44:17

Oh boy! Obama says Richard Cordray is going to make sure you can call your bank and make sure you are getting a fair shake on your mortgage. I look forward to more years of paying rent while those poor people who bought and refied in the bubble continue to live for free because of the evil Wall Street people who took advantage of them.

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 12:01:09

Not the hope and change you were expecting?

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-01-04 12:20:59

As I noted before, the runaway debt markets have significantly disrupted the lives of millions of registered voters. This is a tentative first step to regain control of those markets. No wonder it has met with massive pushback from those making big money from the runaway debt markets, and from the politicians they own.

Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 13:44:04

“I am now the director and my work will be to protect American consumers,” Cordray said at the airport in Cleveland, where he was accompanying the president to a speech on the economy. “I’m going to be 100 percent focused on that.”

Every time they protect someone, I get screwed.

Comment by Neuromance
2012-01-04 14:16:12

If by protect, they mean wrapping up everyone in bubble wrap, then yes, we’ll get screwed.

If by protect, they mean they’ll prevent my neighbor from using his yard as a tire dumping site, then we’ll be helped.

If by protect, they mean they’ll stop a factory from dumping effluent into river, and I’m downstream of the factory, then we’ll be helped.

I think the recent operation of the financial system has been closer to the second and third items in that I have to pay for other people’s messes. The financial system privatized their profits and socialized their losses, imposing massive public costs. If they can stop that, I welcome their protection.

We’ll have to see how it goes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-01-04 15:05:50

If by protect, they mean wrapping up everyone in bubble wrap, then yes, we’ll get screwed.

Bubble wrap. I just adore that stuff. Love to pop those little bubbles, every one. It’s what I call stress relief.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 17:03:19

President Barack Obama appoints Richard Cordray to lead new consumer watchdog agency

01/04/2012 3:38 PM

President Barack Obama made the announcement in Ohio, with Cordray at his side.

“He’ll be in charge of one thing: looking out for the best interests of American consumers,” Obama told a crowd assembled at a high school in Cleveland. “His job will be to protect families like yours from the abuses of the financial industry. His job will be to make sure you’ve got all the information you need to make important financial decisions.”

http://www.boston.com/Boston/politicalintelligence/2012/01/president-barack-obama-appoint-richard-cordray-lead-new-consumer-watchdog-agency/RfKLDpcd6ITRKwfJkyisWN/ - -

“His job will be to protect families like yours from the abuses of the financial industry. His job will be to make sure you’ve got all the information you need to make important financial decisions.”

Richard`s first call to a consumer.

Dude you make $30k delivering pizza, you can`t afford a $500k house.

WA-Wa wa wa

What do you mean I`m too late?

Wa-wa Wa wa

In 2006 huh.

How do you pay for it?

Wa wa

You don`t?

Wa wa wa wa

Four years and you still live there?

 
Comment by SV guy
2012-01-04 18:40:02

I see the prez’s lips move but I don’t hear anything?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by thejdog
2012-01-04 12:16:55

Singapore:

Did you know that more than half of Singapore’s population (of nearly 5 million people) falls within the world’s top 8.8% wealth bracket? The country’s average wealth per adult is nearly $300,000 (USD) and rising.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 12:22:42

Did you know that more than half of Singapore’s population (of nearly 5 million people) falls within the world’s top 8.8% wealth bracket?

That’s because they are all Germans! Oh wait…..

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:33:07

“The country’s average wealth per adult is nearly $300,000 (USD) and rising.”

china man looking down at tank tracks that destroyed his village in the previous winter:

“Look, green shoots in the mud!”

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-01-04 12:43:41

I think they offshored all the low paying jobs to Malaysia.

I’ve also heard that apartments are very pricey in Singapore and that most folks don’t have AC, even though Singapore is in the tropics.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-01-04 12:23:02

The Fed reports $7t was wiped off the value of U.S. housing (and btw, that is 35 times the $200bn to which subprime was supposed to be contained). With 114m or so households in the U.S., that equates to a rough home equity loss of $7,000,000,000,000 / 114,000,000 = $61,403.51 per U.S. household.

Of course this (incorrectly) assumes the losses are evenly distributed over all U.S. households, when in fact they are concentrated on homeowner households. Following this article’s estimate of 71 million U.S. homeowning households, the loss per homeowner household comes out to $7,000,000,000,000 / 71,000,000 = $98,591.54.

The truth lies somewhere in between these extremes, as many of the losses doubtless landed on investors who either held on to their properties or defaulted, dumping the loss on their lenders, after the housing bubble collapsed. Losses are also not uniformly distributed, with bigger losses landing on households located where real estate prices got a bit frothy.

Jan. 4, 2012, 2:00 p.m. EST
Fed may push for rentals of foreclosed homes
By Steve Goldstein

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The Federal Reserve may push supervisors to accept banks and the government-owned mortgage buyers renting out the homes they own, according to a paper issued by the central bank setting out ways to improve the housing market. In a letter to the heads and ranking members of the House and Senate banking committees, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke also said he would push banks and the big buyers of mortgages, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to “find an appropriate balance between prudent lending and appropriate consumer protection, on the one hand, and not unduly restricting mortgage credit, on the other hand.” The paper on “the U.S. housing market: current conditions and policy considerations” seeks to provide a framework for considering the issues and tradeoffs in housing, at a time when prices have dropped about 33% from their 2006 peak, wiping off some $7 trillion of household wealth and hurting consumption.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 12:58:01

No selling $helters to one another, no tossing bomb$ at invading “gangs” home countries, … what’s a MegaDefen$eIndustrialComplexInc. SCOTU$ person suppose to do?

What’s the matter with Kansas? (new POV)

Boeing to close Wichita facility by end of 2013, move tanker work to Texas, Okla., Wash.
AP – 2 hours 45 minutes ago

WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — The Boeing Co. has told its employees that it plans to close its massive defense plant in Wichita by the end of 2013 in a bid to cut costs in a tight market for defense spending.

Wednesday’s announcement means the loss of 2,100 well-paying jobs at its Kansas facility, which was once considered the centerpiece of Wichita’s claim as the air capital of the world.

It also dashes hopes for an additional 7,500 direct and indirect jobs that the company once promised to bring to Wichita with the Air Force air refueling tanker contract.

The work will move to Boeing facilities in Texas, Oklahoma and Washington.

Job reductions at the Wichita facility are scheduled to begin in the third quarter of 2012.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-01-04 13:42:26

SUCKERS!

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-01-04 13:44:14

$700 BILLION a year defense budget is “tight”?!

Marie Antoinette didn’t get it either.

What they really meant to say: “We screwed up the Dreamliner project and now you have eat it.”

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 14:21:45

The military is 20% of the Federal Budget and is shrinking

Entitlements are 55% of the Federal Budget and growing

The feds borrow 40 cents of every dollar they spend.

Do the math.

$700 BILLION a year defense budget is “tight”?!

Comment by CarrieAnn
2012-01-04 15:32:37

So you’re saying we can’t engage in warfare again till the boomer die-off is complete?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 15:47:44

I’m seeing some potential synergy here… :-).

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-01-04 16:06:51

Once again, you are either a liar or misinformed. I lean toward you being a liar and deliberate troll.

The budget is actually, more like $1 TRILLION.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PerCapitaInflationAdjustedDefenseSpending.PNG

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States

Look down the page for the pie chart. Entitlements? Yeah, Wall St. received $16 TRILLION in TAXPAYER backed loans.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-01-04 16:23:53

Oh, he’s a $lipperybanana alright, non-organic type too! ;-)

x1oz of War$ prevention is worth x16oz of Domestic cure$, do the 5th grade math. :-)

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-01-04 17:26:17

BananaDon got caught lying again.

Imagine that.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2012-01-04 13:29:01

B-b-but isn’t this the agency that’s been backing most of the new mortgages the past 3-4 years?

According to the report, the percentage of loans in the FHA’s portfolio with three missed payments or more rose to 9.3% in November, up from 8.4% in August.

“It’s highly likely that the FHA will need a taxpayer bailout over the next three to five years,” said Joseph Gyourko, a real estate professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and author of a report entitled “Is FHA the Next Big Housing Bailout?.”

http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/30/real_estate/federal_housing_bailout/index.htm?iid=HP_LN

Comment by Moman
2012-01-04 14:15:00

The problem is that FHA Has gone away from it’s original mission (young, first time homebuyer) to “first time for this house” homebuyer.

It will almost certainly need a bailout in the future.

Comment by sfrenter
2012-01-04 14:18:06

The problem is that FHA Has gone away from it’s original mission (young, first time homebuyer) to “first time for this house” homebuyer.

Amazes me that “first time home buyer” means someone who has not purchased in 3 years.

Comment by 2banana
2012-01-04 14:22:46

For up to $700,000…

:-(

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-01-04 16:16:59

More weasel words:

$729,750 = “affordable”

 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 18:08:07

sfrenter
We have been suck renting for almost 7, and we owned for 23 years prior. Some of us are legitimate re-entry buyers who fall under “first time” buyers. Maybe it should be renamed to “re-entry”. You do have a point.

What I am not crazy about is the short sale sellers/cash out refi’s getting healed credit in 3 years and another FHA guaranteed loan. That’s BS.

We’re cash and close, having sold our oversized *pos in a regular sale.

*’1998 construction was done by illegals. What a nightmare.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 18:10:24

oops “stuck” not “suck”
it suck-s must have been subliminal.

 
Comment by Anon In DC
2012-01-04 19:02:13

Me thinks you’re not stuck but very clever for being patient.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-01-04 20:43:15

Thanks Anon, but my patience is waning. We have 5 rents going, and we’ve been house hunting a long time. We’re seeing $35K haircuts on stuff in our price range, but oh man, these homes need updating.
So Ca is a freakin mess, with tight housing inventory, and high prices still. Most of what is on the market for us doesn’t pencil out or there are other deal breakers.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-01-04 21:03:18

So Ca is a freakin mess,

Bailed So Ca 94…bailed Nor Cal 08. There’s more to life than there, no matter the reasons why there’s not.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
Comment by jeff saturday
2012-01-04 15:03:59

“Glad this has a good ending:”

+1

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 15:16:06

I’m also glad the locals having been taking donations to help her out. What a crappy holiday season.

 
Comment by drumminj
2012-01-04 15:38:48

Someone please explain the 18 year old widow who’s husband died of lung cancer. How old was this guy? How old was she when had the baby? What’s the age of consent in OK? How creepy is it regardless?

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-01-04 15:49:17

Now now…don’t judge, we do things different in the country :-).

I don’t know. I feel bad for her regardless of what may have been going on in that area.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 17:55:14

How old was this guy?

They showed a photograph of the guy on the video segment; he didn’t look _that_ old…

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-01-04 19:29:02

Andy Kaufman’s gone wrestling…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Kaufman#Illness_and_death

Summary: Andy Kaufman died of lung cancer at 35.

I have no idea about this woman’s husband but good on her for being a lioness instead of a rabbit.

 
 
Comment by SV guy
2012-01-04 18:46:23

Awwww, that’s too bad. Poor intruder.

 
 
Comment by sold in 04
2012-01-04 17:01:38

We will all be living our retirement years in the Calif Desert. Its called the Slabs,and you can live for free, it has huge population !

Comment by combotechie
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2012-01-04 22:38:31

Nice.

 
 
 
Comment by measton
2012-01-04 17:55:20

guest James Rickards, the author of Currency Wars: says this slowdown will be significantly worse than most people think. He believes it will trigger a policy response from the United States that will likely lead to a third round of “quantitative easing” by the Fed.

Rickards thinks China’s economy could slow to a 3.5% growth rate. This doesn’t sound bad, but it would be a disaster relative to the 10% growth rate of the last few decades, and it is much more of slowdown than most analysts are looking for.

In response, Rickards says, the Chinese government would likely devalue China’s currency relative to the dollar, to help stimulate exports. This would counter Washington’s ongoing attempts to do the same thing. Rickards believes that the U.S. would respond with another round of quantitative easing designed to produce inflation, likely through a technique called “nominal GDP targeting.”

(Nominal GDP targeting would allow the Fed to explicitly focus on a target GDP growth rate that includes inflation, as opposed to trying to fight inflation by focusing on real GDP growth. Inflation would help the U.S. reduce the real burden of its massive debt load, and it might also make U.S. exports more competitive.)

A sharp China slowdown could also hammer Europe, which is already reeling from a banking and sovereign debt crisis.

finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/rickards-china-slowdown-worse-think-165205164.html

It’s a race to the bottom.
This will of course crush demand across the globe. Things people need will cost more but they won’t be making more money. Thus they will cut back on manufactured goods. This will create more unemployment and down we go.

The US will fare far better than China in this type of war. Why?
1. We have a lot of debt.
2. We export food and coal
3. We import a lot of manufactured goods produced in China.

This does not mean that things won’t suck here in the US of A they will just suck more in China.

My guess is trade wars will follow currency wars, once countries realize that the people are getting angry. Once the US has printed enough money to monetize the debt then they can pump some cash at the population and put up trade barriers. China will be sitting on a pile of worthless paper and won’t have access to any markets around the globe.

 
2012-01-04 18:32:39

Headed to India for an epic trip.

Photography bag all packed.

Will try and drop in tomorrow (flight is in the evening.)

Check out my photo website (link above.) Might be able to update on the road but no promises are being made.

If not, see y’all all in February with plenty of tales about culinary adventures and derring-do! :P

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 18:41:34

Have a great trip, FPSS!

 
Comment by rms
2012-01-05 00:18:37

Headed to India for an epic trip.

No kids in school?

 
 
Comment by Anon In DC
2012-01-04 19:10:45

The gradual return of the ~$300K house in suburban Boston. Another few years and at $250K or $225K I might bite. Getting closer to buying = renting.

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/Arlington_MA_02474_M32640-20311

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/Arlington_MA_02474_M35334-24400

 
2012-01-04 19:10:49

If any of you take trips, and this is an entirely gratuitous post about packing but very useful, the important fact is that most of the space is taken up by the air between fabric.

I was taught that in entirely FPPS™ style by a friend of mine who came over before a trip (a long time ago), and opened the conversation with, “Dude, you suck!” when he saw my bag (and no wine had been consumed at that point.)

He then proceeded to re-pack my very neatly packed bag with one-third the space. There was literally blank space. Tons of it!

After that, I learnt. You roll the neatly folded “flat” stuff into tight precise rounds and lay them out in formation. (Scientists will recognize that crystal-packing is what’s being done.)

Apparently, there are also these vacuum-seals for clothes that need to stay ironed (suits, etc.) They sit flat at the bottom of the case.

Hope my experience helps someone!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 19:45:35

Jan. 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EST
These high yielders look good for 2012
By Bill DeShurko

There’s a good reason why the term “liquidity” sometimes refers to money. Like a liquid, money will always flow to fill a void.

In 2012, there will be a lack of attractive voids where money can flow. The one big exception will be the U.S. Despite all of our troubles, to anyone sitting with a big pile of cash (particularly outside our borders), we have to look downright attractive. Picture yourself sitting almost anywhere in the world with a few hundred million to invest. Where would you put it?

China? China’s facing a slowing economy - slowing to a pace we envy, but slowing nonetheless. Slowing means wage stagflation, unemployment and unrest. Remember one big advantage of our political system is that when we don’t like our leaders, we have elections. In China, they have revolutions. I’d steer clear.

Emerging markets? Most emerging market economies revolve around commodities. Slowing global economies mean stagnant or falling commodity prices. No opportunity there.

Europe? Need anything be said?

The one global constant is that the printing presses will likely be running at full throttle to keep each economy afloat.

That leaves the world’s largest economy, with a stable political system (true, it may not seem that stable by November!) and a stock market full of modestly priced stocks of companies chock full of cash on their balance sheets, with modestly growing net earnings to add further to their coffers.

Comment by measton
2012-01-04 20:02:41

I’d add that the things to invest in are things people with piles of money and access to cheap credit might buy as a long term inflation hedge. Don’t invest in anything that requires a consumer. The consumer will be unemployed and fearing for his life. I think infrastructure plays are also interesting. My guess is a lot of this cheap money will still be spent by gov.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-04 23:18:23

The consumer will be unemployed and fearing for his life. I think infrastructure plays are also interesting.

Well said. Another though is that you don’t want to invest in anything that the consumer will be selling to raise the cash that they need.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2012-01-04 20:19:05

Latest from Charles Hugh Smith:

President Obama, Demopublican

President Obama’s signal accomplishments could easily have been signed into law by a moderate Republican.

The corporate Mainstream Media depends on ideological differences to generate “news” and advertising revenues, and the Status Quo depends on ideological differences to generate fear “of the other side” and enthusiasm “for our side.”

As the 2012 election season kicks off in earnest, we have to ask: exactly what is the difference between President Obama’s actual policies and those of centerist Republicans?

The president recently highlighted three centerpiece accomplishments of his supposedly rabidly Democratic administration:

1. Ending the war in Iraq

2. Ending the Armed Forces’ policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell”

3. Passing sickcare reform, oops, I mean “healthcare” reform

If we examine these supposedly tremendous accomplishments, we find that moderate Republicans were equally capable of passing such lukewarm reforms. The war in Iraq was deeply unpopular, acceptance of gays is increasingly mainstream, and healthcare reform had been on everyone’s agenda for years.

Anyone with the slightest grasp of American history could find equally “liberal” accomplishments in the administrations of Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and even George Bush 1. Indeed, it could easily be argued that Obama ended the war far later than a moderate Republican might have, and that he caved into the sickcare Status Quo to such a degree that his “reform” essentially accomplishes nothing.

The hundreds of pages of reform boil down to a super-committee that is supposedly going to set prices and practices lower in the future. Meanwhile the program is at least 40% waste and fraud and continues growing at multiples of the underlying economy and tax revenues.

By any measure, this “reform” simply confirms the healthcare cartels remain firmly in charge.

On the other side the of the ledger, Obama continues the FUBAR war in Afghanistan, sacrificing American lives and treasure for political posturing, and he agreed (”with reservations”) to a congressional bill that gives the President unprecedented rights to impose “prolonged detention” on suspected terrorists and handing them to the U.S. Armed Forces, even as the military insists it has no interest or need in assuming such detention responsibilities.

Would a moderate Republican have agreed to gut the Bill of Rights with such tepid “reservations”?

It can be argued that Obama, visibly uncomfortable with members of the Armed Forces and fearful of being labeled “soft” on terrorism, has carved out an essentially fascist policy far to the right of even “rock-ribbed” Republicans.

From a more objective view stripped of phony ideological parsing, what exactly is the difference between Obama’s policies and those of moderate Republicans? We can get a better grasp on his Demopublican nature by asking a few key questions:

How many bloated weapons systems has he cancelled? (Zero)

How many overseas bases of the Empire has he closed? (none)

Who runs his financial policies? Wall Street cronies.

I think you get the idea here: there is literally no difference between Obama and a moderate Republican when it comes to the truly important policies governing the nation’s insolvent finances, its predatory financial sector, its corrupt and fraudulent sickcare system or its sprawling Empire.

Obama’s policies have all aided and abetted existing Status Quo cartels and fiefdoms. He has changed absolutely nothing of import except further eroding civil liberties.

President Obama can be charitably characterized as an ineffectual Demopublican. From those demanding more, then he can be accurately described as a well-meaning puppet of Wall Street and the rest of the Status Quo cartels and fiefdoms.

Longtime readers know I reject all the phony ideological “differences” between the two stooge parties; in reality, the differences are purely cosmetic and are exaggerated for propaganda and fund-raising purposes. Both stooge parties are in thrall to Wall Street and the financial sector, the sickcare cartels, etc., and both support a global Empire and endlessly rising public debt to finance their cronies. Both have consistently supported private profits while shifting monumental losses to the public. Both have consistently supported an out-of-control Federal Reserve. In every truly important way, the two stooge parties are merely two sides of the same Imperial coin.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 23:25:08

Got giant snakes? :-)

Giant non-native pythons spreading in Florida
By Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY
Updated 9m ago

Giant Burmese pythons have already established themselves across thousands of square miles of Florida’s Everglades, where outdoor workers now routinely find them. The state had held out hope that bays, inlets and open seas would form a natural barrier, keeping the non-native snakes, often discarded pets, from spreading to the Florida Keys and beyond. But that might not be the case.

Research published this week finds that even newly-hatched pythons can survive in seawater for up to a month.

“The fact that this study has ruled out one of the most hoped-for forms of physical barriers, saltwater, as preventing the spread of invasive pythons in Florida puts even more onus on human action to prevent the spread of these damaging reptiles,” U.S. Geological Survey director Marcia McNutt said in a release. “This study demonstrates the distinct possibility that pythons could spread to new suitable habitats one estuary at a time.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 23:40:07

Get ready for more Fed-sponsored stealth bailouts of homemoaners and banks, which shift the costs of their foolish lending decisions to those who tried their best to avoid any housing bubble participation whatever.

The prudent must be punished to save greater fools from the financial fallout of their folly!

Financial Services
Fed’s Housing Fix Means Everyone Loses

By Shanthi Bharatwaj 01/04/12 - 04:06 PM EST

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — The Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday proposed policies that would force a recovery in housing, but cautioned that there was no single solution to the housing market’s problems and that everyone from investors to taxpayers would need to feel the pain.

In a 26-page white paper, the Fed outlined ways to ease some of the pressures afflicting the housing market.

While some of the weakness was due to weak labor market conditions and poor demand, policies that would address the excess inventory of foreclosed homes, borrower access to mortgage credit and inefficient foreclosure procedures should be considered, the central bank said.

Still, while policy action in these areas could facilitate the recovery of the housing market, “economic losses will remain, and these losses must ultimately be allocated among homeowners, lenders, guarantors, investors, and taxpayers,” the Fed cautioned.

Some of the proposals in the white paper have been discussed before, including one that looks at the conversion of foreclosed homes to rental units. “..The large inventory of foreclosed or surrendered properties is contributing to excess supply in the for-sale market, placing downward pressure on house prices and exacerbating the loss in aggregate housing wealth. At the same time, rental markets are strengthening in some areas of the country, reflecting in part a decline in the homeownership rate,” the paper noted.

“Reducing some of the barriers to converting foreclosed properties to rental units will help redeploy the existing stock of houses in a more efficient way. Such conversions might also increase lenders’ eventual recoveries on foreclosed and surrendered properties.”

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-05 08:52:02

“economic losses will remain, and these losses must ultimately be allocated among homeowners, lenders, guarantors, investors, and taxpayers,” the Fed cautioned.

The hunt for the bagholder continues…

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 23:44:51

I’m heartened that at least some top economists learned valuable lessons from the housing bubble’s collapse.

September 8, 2009, 2:00 pm
What We’ve Learned: Ugly Truths About Housing
By EDWARD L. GLAESER
A broken Shannon Stapleton/Reuters A broken “For Sale” sign outside a home in Queens, N.Y.
Today’s Economist

With the anniversary of the failure of Lehman Brothers approaching, we asked each of our Daily Economists to explain what we’ve learned from the financial crisis. Here Edward L. Glaeser, an economics professor at Harvard, responds. Find the rest of the series here.

One year ago, Lehman Brothers fell and our financial markets teetered at the brink of a precipice. This event looms large in global finance, but it appears less momentous from the perspective of the housing markets.

Housing prices peaked not 12 but 40 months ago in May 2006. After experiencing a staggering 96 nominal percent price increase during the six years before then (72 percent in real dollars), prices started a slow decline. By September 2008, prices had already dropped 22 percent from the peak. Of course, they fell another 12 percent in the six months after Lehman collapsed.

What have we learned from the great housing bubble and crash of the aughts? Most obviously, we have learned that housing prices can be extraordinary volatile. This was less obvious from previous housing cycles.

During the last housing cycle, from 1987 to 1993, the Case-Shiller 10-city index increased by 31 percent between January 1987 (when Case-Shiller data starts) and the peak in March 1990. During the 38-month period before the more recent peak, the 10-city index increased by 55 percent.

But during the recent period, five metropolitan areas (out of 20) experienced price growth above 75 percent; no city experienced such a massive boom during the earlier cycle.

After the earlier peak, the market fell for 42 months before bottoming, with the 10-city decline at about 8 percent in nominal terms, which was closer to 20 percent in real terms. While there are no guarantees against further declines, national housing prices seemed to stop falling in May 2009, exactly three years after the more recent peak. In the current decline, housing prices dropped by 33 percent in nominal terms, or perhaps 38 percent in real terms. A 24 percentage point larger nominal rise in the recent boom was associated with a 25 percentage point greater nominal fall.

So let no one ever again say foolish things like housing prices never fall.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-01-04 23:48:41

WSJ dot com
U.S. NEWS
JANUARY 5, 2012

Apartment-Vacancy Rate Tumbles to 2001 Leve
BY DAWN WOTAPKA

The nation’s apartment-vacancy rate in the fourth quarter fell to its lowest level since late 2001 as Americans continued to favor renting homes instead of buying them.

Rents climbed, but data firm Reis Inc. said the increase was less than expected. Landlords of properties intended for lower-income renters found it more difficult to raise prices, according to Reis.

Multifamily property has been the star of the real-estate sector for more than a year, generating profits for landlords but headaches for renters struggling with the economic downturn. Demand has swelled from people being foreclosed out of their houses…

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-01-05 00:06:41

Funny, I was just looking at that article myself, PB…

It is shocking how quickly the vacancy rate has fallen over the past two years. There’s a nice chart of it on CR right now.

Is this just the effect of moving people out of foreclosures and into apartments, and the foreclosures remaining off the market?

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post