February 26, 2012

A Useful Working Assumption

Readers suggested a topic on used house salespeople. “How about how Realtors are Liars? They’re out there advising the public to buy housing while prices are falling, attempting to create a sense of urgency by suggesting sales increasing rapidly when in fact they’re at 14 year lows and flat. These people just lie and lie and lie yet whenever their corrupt behavior is mentioned, the issue is redirected onto ‘banksters’. Why is that?”

A reply, “Because the Realtor® lies only steal 6% at a swipe from the sheeple loanowners while the banksters steal millions. Also the ‘nesting instinct’ which leads sheeple to commit financial suicide just so they can paint the walls any color they want. Sheeple love what they perceive as success/confidence, see also the furry-eyebrowed Realtor® in the movie ‘American Beauty’.”

One said, “We never hear about the realtors and all the non-banker people that are lying about real estate. Whenever you buy or sell a home, there is a long line of people demanding their cut for overpriced or completely unnecessary services. These things are borderline if not outright fraudulent. There’s no movement to go after them so they will still be around long after the bankers are gone.”

Another had this, “This is from my realtor could it be a lie?”

‘ - I’m super happy to say that we have some feedback from the lender on XXXXXXX. Believe it or not, this is lightening speed for a lender in a short sale…’

‘As in every short sale, the lender completed their own value assessment of the property. It appears that their assessment came back at a much higher value than the $399,000 list price. This can be considered great news for any buyer of this property when looking for an opportunity to purchase a property with existing equity.’

‘Fortunately, the lender is not requiring that the list price be increased for approval, but they have countered your $XXXXXX offer price. In a nut shell, we will need to increase your offer a bit in order to secure an approval. This does not mean we need to go over the asking price, but we need to be closer to the $399,000 list price. - ‘

“In all fairness this is a BANK lie being passed on to me by a Realtor like I am so stupid to think I have instant equity in a possibly still falling market and can’t use the internet to find what similair homes sell for which is about 400K except ‘as is’ foreclourses they are about 380K because they are trashed. Have to see the house again and decide if I want to increase offer. Its empty now so I can see it better. I can also use a home inspection report to drive price back down again if there is anything wrong. Don’t know what the bank will say to that but I don’t want to buy a house that’s got problems. NO need to reply too quickly to a bank in any case.”

To which was said, “You do realize that normally what the bank gets on these properties is a BPO—a ‘broker’s price opinion.’ In other words, it is just a number that one particular realtor thought would be a good value to put on the property. It is not the same as a good appraisal showing multiple recent sales as comps.”

“Short-sales are strange beasts, because everyone knows that the listing party (the nominal ‘owner’) is not the party that will have to approve the sale in the end. I mean, the owner COULD sell at a below-mortgage price, assuming they were willing to bring lots-o-cash to closing. But since they don’t have the means, the listing price is kind of a strange fiction.”

“I don’t think it’s ‘fraudish’, but it’s definitely different from a normal sale where a full-price offer would presumably get an acceptance. But since everyone knows that it is different, and they make sure to explicitly list it as a ’short sale’, I think it’s ok…”

And finally, “(This) is a constant and therefore unlikely to be part of the explanation for the RE bubble. It is NOT the case that every salesman is a lying sack of sh!t. But it IS a very useful working assumption. And always has been. Frankly weren’t we supposed to figure that out at the age of 8 after watching Saturday morning commercials?”

The Rock River Times in Illinois. “According to the Illinois Association of Realtors’ (IAR) fourth-quarter 2011 report, Illinois home sales (single family and condominiums) totaled 25,394, up 14.8 percent from 22,114 home sales in the fourth quarter of 2010. The 4Q11 statewide median home sales price was $128,000, down 10.8 percent from $143,500 in 4Q10.”

“‘Chicago continues to show an absorption of properties in the market by aggressive buyers seeking great opportunities to purchase now,’ said Realtor Bob Floss, president of the Chicago Association of Realtors and broker-owner of Bob Floss and Son Realty. ‘The decrease in median price and increase in units sold continues to show the downward pressure distressed sales still have on property values across the city. With interest rates at historic lows, and sellers and buyers looking to make real deals close, 2012 remains an excellent time for first-time, right-size buyers, or investors to get off the fence and make long-term investments in real estate.’”

The Chicago Tribune in Illinois. “‘If you’re selling your place, right now you’re in a beauty contest and a pricing war,’ said Tommy Hicks, an agent at SouthportSotheby’sInternational Realty in Chicago. ‘The really good stuff goes in a week,’ said Hicks, who with his wife has been looking for three months for a $1 million fixer-upper in Chicago’s Lincoln Park neighborhood. ‘People seem to be catching on to the fact that if you bought something in the last seven to eight years, you probably can’t sell it for what you bought it for.’”

“‘Realtors are busy like the old days,’ said Bob Floss, president of the Chicago association. ‘They’re saying, ‘We’re working like dogs but for a third of what we used to make.’”

“At this point, Floss said, it’s a pretty cut-and-dried conversation with homeowners interested in listing their home for sale. ‘If you want to sell, this is what we got now,’ he said. ‘And if you want to wait, wait, but how long is the wait? (Sellers) are saying ‘OK, we don’t like it but this is what it is.’”

The Nashua Telegraph in New Hampshire. “According to RE/MAX of New England, which releases a regional housing report each month, in January 2012, more housing units were sold in the state than in the same month the previous year, but the median sale price dipped almost 3 percent. The median price of units sold in New Hampshire dropped from $185,000 in January 2011 to $180,000 in January 2012. Still, that 2.7 percent decline was one of the smallest in New England. Only Maine saw a smaller decline, of 2.3 percent. Connecticut and Rhode Island saw the biggest median price drops over the period, with declines of 12.2 and 12.3 percent, respectively.”

“‘The slight uptick in sales is encouraging as it means buyers are active in the market, however we are still trying to find a balance between buyer expectations and market realities when it comes to pricing,’ said Jay Hummer, executive vice president of RE/MAX of New England.”




RSS feed

34 Comments »

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2012-02-25 18:18:41

Real estate broker charged with grand theft

NAMPA — A former Nampa real estate broker who filed for bankruptcy in November 2010 is charged with two counts of felony grand theft for taking more than $400,000 from business clients.

http://www.ktvb.com/news/local/Real-estate-broker-charged-with-grand-theft-138408939.html

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-02-25 08:06:13

‘this is a BANK lie being passed on to me by a Realtor’.

I understand the frustration. But if you are looking to buy a house today, this is a big part of the inventory and the best prices. So it is constructive to understand it’s a business. First; these aren’t the banks you are dealing with. It’s asset managers. And they have decided to work through UHS. With HUD, you cannot make an offer without a buyers agent.

These asset managers job is to get the most money for the house. You’ll never talk to them, never know who they are, etc. It’s helpful to realize these asset managers tell the UHS how the cookie crumbles, not the other way around. It’s best to approach the whole REO market without emotion. Base everything on cold facts and cash. Watch your back, and assume everyone involved is looking out for themselves, cuz they are.

Comment by cactus
2012-02-25 09:36:21

Base everything on cold facts and cash. Watch your back, and assume everyone involved is looking out for themselves, cuz they are.”

Thats exactly right thanks for the reminder

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-25 10:02:39

“asset managers”

Joe Homebuyer is squaring off with members of the 1% club who will scam, lie and deceive him into paying top dollar for a piece of cr@p, and who can pay for the best attorneys on the planet to defend their actions. Good luck at doing any better than overpaying for a piece of cr@p!

Comment by Muggy
2012-02-25 18:06:38

“Good luck at doing any better than overpaying for a piece of cr@p!”

I’ve been thinking about this… then why not hire a guy like RAL to build new?

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2012-02-25 18:21:10

Joe Six Pack will get cut off at the knees yet again.

 
2012-02-25 18:57:15

Not to get technical, these are not guys in the 1%.

They are guys who are trained by the guys in the 1%.

These guys are much more likely to be upper middle class than rich actually. However, the facts still stand. Their job is to get the max $ for the house. Your job is the opposeite.

Mano a mano.

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-02-25 15:50:22

It’s best to approach the whole REO market without emotion. Base everything on cold facts and cash. Watch your back, and assume everyone involved is looking out for themselves, cuz they are.

One other thing: if you are trying to buy a REO or short-sale, expect that things may move VERY slowly. Glacial, in fact.

It is a totally different timeline that you would expect from a normal seller.

Comment by Ben Jones
2012-02-25 16:48:04

‘expect that things may move VERY slowly’

For a short sale, yes, but HUD guarantees an answer in 24 hours. It’s usually less. Fannie/Freddie pretty much the same, but it isn’t guaranteed.

You can put response deadlines in your offer too.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-02-26 11:44:53

For a short sale, yes, but HUD guarantees an answer in 24 hours. It’s usually less. Fannie/Freddie pretty much the same, but it isn’t guaranteed.

Wow, I didn’t realize that HUD/Fannie/Freddie moved that quickly on REO sales. Good to know—thanks Ben!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:05:10

Is there any centralized information source for identifying REO properties in your area which are HUD/Fannie/Freddie owned?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:28:57

Millions of homes in shadow inventory, yet only nine HUD REO homes, none of them half-decent, for all of the 3m San Diego County residents?

Hmmmmmmm…

Search Results for HUD Homes in San Diego County, CA
9 listings found
Details

044-426890 15935 Spring Oaks Rd #199
El Cajon, CA 92021
San Diego County $39,600 [The Listing and Selling Brokers are eligible to receive a commission of $1,250 for the sale of this property] 3 2.00 Extended [All Bidders] 02/27/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-429527 1423 Graves Avenue Unit 172
El Cajon, CA 92021
San Diego County $80,000 1 1.00 Exclusive [Owner Occupants, Nonprofits, and Government Agencies only] 02/28/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-429589 614 Great Sandy Trl #T
Julian, CA 92036
San Diego County $106,400 [Price Reduced] 3 2.00 Extended [All Bidders] 02/27/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-433574 4150 Charles Street
La Mesa, CA 91941
San Diego County $249,000 [New Listing] 2 1.00 Exclusive [Owner Occupants, Nonprofits, and Government Agencies only] 03/03/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-437585 2230 Jefferson Avenue
Escondido, CA 92027
San Diego County $255,000 3 2.00 Exclusive [Owner Occupants, Nonprofits, and Government Agencies only] 02/27/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-438173 235 Country Garden Lane
San Marcos, CA 92069
San Diego County $376,000 [Price Reduced] 3 2.00 Extended [All Bidders] 02/27/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-438208 1476 Levant Ln #1
Chula Vista, CA 91913
San Diego County $161,100 [Price Reduced] 2 2.00 Extended [All Bidders] 02/27/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-439293 1632 San Miguel Ave
Spring Valley, CA 91977
San Diego County $179,000 [New Listing] 3 1.50 Exclusive [Owner Occupants, Nonprofits, and Government Agencies only] 03/06/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info
044-440015 1720 Englewood Drive
Lemon Grove, CA 91945
San Diego County $195,000 3 1.10 Exclusive [Owner Occupants, Nonprofits, and Government Agencies only] 02/27/2012 View Street
Map it
Email Info

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-02-26 12:35:02

All three have REO websites. They are often incomplete, especially HUD. Properties are being added, taken off (under contract), and then added back (deal falls through) continuously. For HUD, there are UHS in every area who are HUD brokers. Contact them and they’ll email you a PDF list when it comes out, usually with photos.

A big problem for consumers is the data stranglehold UHS have. The MLS will have the best picture of what’s available any given day. Then you have price reductions, which are obviously important. How long has it been on the market? Disclosures, seller remarks, all sorts of things. Try to find a free MLS website that allows you to sort details, check ‘new foreclosures today’, price reductions. Then check it every day and that will be about as good as you can get. A combination of the above is even better.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:38:05

Here are three Fannie Mae REO homes in our zip code. The Zestimate for the Bristol Ridge Terrace home shows $1.2m as the value in February 2005, but I have no idea how they come up with that cr@p.

17161 Alva Rd Unit 1724
San Diego, CA 92127
Condo/Co-op
Under Contract
1 br / 1 ba
$139,900
YES

15996 Turtleback Rd
San Diego, CA 92127
Single-Family
Under Contract
2 br / 2 ba
$324,000
YES

15499 Bristol Ridge Ter
San Diego, CA 92127
Single-Family
Under Contract
3 br / 2.5 ba
$494,900
YES

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:41:03

“A big problem for consumers is the data stranglehold UHS have.”

Totally! Before I started posting on this web site, I used to live under the delusion that there were laws in the U.S. against price fixing and collusion. Now I know better.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:44:37

“$494,900″

There was a fellow I used to know quite well when he lived down the street from us and we shared carpool duties to get our daughters, who were best friends, to school. I once discussed the possibility of his family buying a home in that area where Bristol Terrace is located, but he opined that they could never have afforded it.

To make a long story short, the urgency of wifey’s nesting instincts overcame his superior judgment about three years ago, when they paid around $500K for a crappy condo in a far less attractive area…

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-02-26 12:48:32

I used to live under the delusion that there were laws in the U.S. against price fixing and collusion.

It’s even more fun once you realize that the majority of these colluding/price-fixing “trade association” cartels were specifically approved into existence by the government during the Great Depression under the theory that doing so would help stimulate the economy.

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:50:58

“$494,900″

Don’t know how accurate that Zestimate of $1.2m for the Feb 2005 price is, but for the record, the recent sale price represents a reduction of

($494,900/$1,200,000-1)*100% = -58.8%.

I honestly had no idea home prices in our area were down by over 50%…

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 12:53:49

This is classic: Change your estimate of my home’s value, or I am never going to use your web site again! LOLOLLOOLLOLLLOOOOL!!!!!!!

My home’s zestimate is way off.
Can I contact anyone to have them review it?

My house is showing a zestimate of 96,000. This is miles away from reality, My home was bought for around 97,000 in 2002 and had a nearly $100,000 remodel in 2007 before I purchased the home. I am assuming this is why the zestimate is off.

I know many people come to this site to get a rough idea of what properties are worth and to look at homes for sale. My wife and I are considering selling in the next year to move back closer to her family and I would love to use Zillow to help sell my home. I think its a fantastic site and for the most part, the zestimates are pretty accurate. But I am not going to use zillow at all if it is telling potential buyers that the home is worth $75,000 less than fair market value. their bird’s eye view even points to a home that is not mine…. it’s 5 houses down

Is there a way to contact someone to have my property reviewed? I recently updated a few flaws in the home facts, but I don’t think it will impact my zestimate as largely as it should.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 13:02:22

Here is what comes up when you search Freddie Mac’s REO site for San Diego County homes with 4 or more bedrooms.

You have to wonder what kind of drastic renovation might be necessary to bring a 5br home priced at $235K up to habitable condition.

Homesteps Search Results

Click a photo to view property details or begin a New Feature Search

5 Properties Found (Limit: 100)
Page 1 of 1

Address Price Rooms Beds Bath
6075 SCHUYLER ST
SAN DIEGO, CA $219,900 9 4 2.00
1137 KERN PL
ESCONDIDO, CA $234,575 5 5 2.50
379 PASEO MARGUERITA
VISTA, CA $297,500 7 4 3.00
1811 NAVAJO PL
ESCONDIDO, CA $339,900 7 4 2.50
830 RANCHO BRAYDON LANE
ALPINE, CA $419,900 15 5 3.0

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-26 14:23:20

“My home was bought for around 97,000 in 2002 and had a nearly $100,000 remodel in 2007 before I purchased the home.”

Are there lots of sellers out there living under the delusion that the market value of their home increases dollar-for-dollar with their remodeling costs?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-25 08:32:47

My last business conversation of any length with a Realtor® was back in 2004, when one was trying her best to talk my wife and me into taking out an interest-only loan to buy a bubbleliciously-priced San Diego property. I politely held my ground on what a foolish idea that seemed, but she just wouldn’t back down.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-02-25 09:27:35

Here is my thought on Realtors: They are the Banksters’ pawns. The Banksters could have nipped the bubble in the bud had they insisted on historical underwriting. The Realtor’s job was to create the feeding frenzy, for which they were rewarded handsome commissions, the highest in the world.

What is interesting is that other countries had housing bubbles without the equivalent of the NAR Crime Syndicate or the MLS monopoly in their territory.

In many countries, house sales are a private transaction between the buyer and seller, with realtors seldom being involved. for example, my parents sold 3 pieces of real estate in Mexico City over the years. Each time the sale was accomplished via a newspaper advert. There are realtors in Mexico of course, but unlike here it isn’t hard to sell without retaining one.

In almost every bubble nation the banksters were handing out loans like candy

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-02-25 09:56:49

“They are the Banksters’ pawns.”

And home buyers get to enjoy pride of pawnership plus free govt-sponsored insurance, just as soon as they join the Pawnership Society.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-02-25 09:51:32

see also the furry-eyebrowed Realtor® in the movie ‘American Beauty’

The squad saw “Sex, Lies, and Videotape” for the first time a few months ago and was wondering where we recognized the creepy lawyer/husband character from… It’s because he was a Realtor® in “American Beauty”, a creepy, egomaniac, sociopath Realtor®.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001251/

 
Comment by Bombo_Buster
2012-02-25 11:41:05

Really? The banks had to take most of the haircuts as they were holding the bag when countless of borrowers defaulted with little or no consequences. There were no 1099 sent out to them for the shortfall in the short sale or foreclosure. And the government (both federal and state) are going like hungry wolves after the banks for the so-called foreclosure irregularities. And all the people who took loans that they obviously could not afford or those who could afford them, walked out with impunity are portrayed as victims.

Comment by Blue Skye
2012-02-25 12:56:50

No one here believes that the deadbeats were vicitms.

No one here believes that the banks have taken the brunt of the defaults either. Rather; the banks have intentionally postponed foreclosure and mark to market accounting just to avoid “bearing the brunt”. In the meantime, the taxpayer buys up their rotten securities and force feeds them with free money. All is well for the banks as long as their managers can suck off the government teat and pay themselves a big fat bonus.

You work for which bank?

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-02-25 15:55:36

And the government (both federal and state) are going like hungry wolves after the banks for the so-called foreclosure irregularities.

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

You kill me.

The settlement was a _pittance_. And most of it is coming from the taxpayers; for example, the banks can claim credit against the $25B total for modifications where Fannie/Freddie actually are taking the hit.

My understanding is that only about $5B will actually come from the banks.

You are clearly an agent of the banks.

Comment by Robin
2012-02-25 23:36:06

I truly hate that our blog allows the perpetuation of the myth that the lying, cheating real estate used home seller gets $60k on a $1m sale.

In CA, tell me if I am wrong, it is split 4 ways between the listing agent and listing broker, the selling agent and selling broker.

All is very negotiable, but IMHO tremendously overvalued and overpriced.

Spout invective if you will, but trash not the facts, please!

Two or three in CA must be worthwhile - :)

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-02-26 07:00:58

Are you disputing the assertion(really a fact) that reaItors are lying, corrupt, unethical incompetent scumbags?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by LasVegasDude
2012-02-26 09:21:52

Does it really, really matter if it is split up to four ways?? Does it matter how many lying, unethical people are involved in a transaction?? You prove the HBB point of a bunch of hungry, lying wolves devouring the sheeple and the economy.

Give me and the Southern Nevada economy a bloody break!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2012-02-26 10:40:00

“This can be considered great news for any buyer of this property when looking for an opportunity to purchase a property with existing equity.”

she lobotomized me with her words.

 
Comment by frankie
2012-02-27 04:15:06

While it is self evident that realtors or as we would say in the UK Estate Agents are liars, I suspect they fall into the
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”
section of society and are quite happy for the rest of us to join them in LaLa land.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post