April 23, 2012

Bits Bucket for April 23, 2012

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

287 Comments »

Comment by Liars Are Realtors®
2012-04-23 04:32:28

Liars Are Realtors® (my apologies to liars)

Comment by goon squad
2012-04-23 07:12:34

Let’s hear the REIC Liars® spin this one about future “household formation”

Yahoo News: 1 in 2 new graduates are jobless or underemployed

“A weak labor market already has left half of young college graduates either jobless or underemployed in positions that don’t fully use their skills and knowledge.

Taking underemployment into consideration, the job prospects for bachelor’s degree holders fell last year to the lowest level in more than a decade.

Broken down by occupation, young college graduates were heavily represented in jobs that require a high school diploma or less.

Any job gains are going mostly to workers at the top and bottom of the wage scale, at the expense of middle-income jobs commonly held by bachelor’s degree holders.”

The future belongs to Lucky Ducky :)

Comment by FB wants a do over
2012-04-23 08:05:36

1 in 2? Half?

So what they’re saying is that 50% of new college graduates are either jobless or underemployed.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 08:13:58

IIRC, this has been the case in Japan for some time. The kids graduating from second tier schools end up working menial jobs while the good jobs go to elite school grads, such as Tokyo University.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 08:17:24

Wow, that sounds familiar. Seems like there’s always more ways for the 1% kids to keep their rightful place in society.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 08:43:25

Why do you think the 1% are pushing to get rid of public education? Can’t have any poor but smart kids getting an education or — horrors — a scholarship, and competing with the little princes and princesses.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:43:29

Why do you think the 1% are pushing to get rid of public education?

Correct. You don’t need any education to do a menial job. Most illegals are functionally illiterate in Spanish (never mind English).

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2012-04-23 09:51:43

I am by no means a one percenter. I would like to see public education ended, because it fails so many kids.

Too many people (kids and adults) believe that if something is free it’s of little or no value. Make the parent(s) write a check, and provide a progressive tax credit (more money to those with less income) that offsets the cost for those at the lowest income levels.

Hey, we can even use the same logic to mandate such payments as we used to justify the health insurance mandate.

 
Comment by mathguy
2012-04-23 10:07:14

As a recipient of public education I really hope it continues, I just hope they cut the funding down to what’s really needed. Despite the bad rap public ed gets for the general population, those who choose to learn what they can while there generally benefit themselves and society greatly. Building 100 million dollar schools and paying administrators 150-300k to run a high school is stupid though. Teachers making 60k/yr in California don’t bother me, but teachers making 85k- 100k w/ a pension at 80% and 3 months of the year off does. And what bothers me more is the teachers union that fights for tenure and bad teachers. Tenure should be a yearly performance review with a good result. 2 bad years in a row and hit the bricks. Give them a 401k so it can follow them out the door instead of this pension crapola.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-04-23 10:07:56

Too many people (kids and adults) believe that if something is free it’s of little or no value. Make the parent(s) write a check, and provide a progressive tax credit (more money to those with less income) that offsets the cost for those at the lowest income levels.

I’m going to guess you’re a renter Bill… public education is not free. Ask any property owner who has to write checks quarterly for real estate taxes.

I have to write property tax checks and then checks for private school tuition because the public schools are awful… and based on .gov stats, MA schools rank as some of the highest.

The public school systems in this country need to be completely overhauled, from the closing of the Federal Department of Education to the reform of state/country/local education boards, educational administration, and teacher’s unions. It’s broke and it’s a huge money sink that more money won’t fix…

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:30:49

Our local public schools have served my kids well. They took AP classes and have done well in college. And our property tax bill is $2000 a year.

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 11:05:43

Empires are costly to run huh?

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-04-23 11:23:46

I’m a product of private school (Catholic School), my wife of public school. Both of us went to school in CA, we both have done well.

Where we live now, we will send our kids to the public school. They are quite good, but largely because (1) parents are very involved in their kids’ educations, and (2) parents in the area donate money to the schools in addition to property taxes.

We are quite lucky that our public schools are so good…it certainly isn’t the case everywhere.

 
Comment by rms
2012-04-23 11:28:49

Teachers making 60k/yr in California don’t bother me, but teachers making 85k- 100k w/ a pension at 80% and 3 months of the year off does.

You can’t live in California on $60k/yr, or else I’d be there with my $85k/yr. Plus, the teachers likely have college loans to pay. The entire system has broken down in this regard.

 
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 12:02:17

My wife is in her 3rd year of teaching. She makes slightly over $60k. I think 60,400. She’s teaching summer school this year for a STEM program so it should end up somewhere around $64k.

She’ll also get checks for not missing any work days (they buy back sick time) and for tuition reimbursement. She started at 49k (had her masters’ already) and leveled up a few times because of good performance reviews and grad school credits (she is doing her Ph.D.).

There are definitely disparities in teacher pay depending on where you teach. Baltimore City and Washington D.C. pay very well.

 
Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 12:46:08

“My wife is in her 3rd year of teaching. She makes slightly over $60k.”

Whoa, where’s this (you can be general)?

 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 13:04:57

Baltimore.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-04-23 14:11:55

Our local public schools have served my kids well. They took AP classes and have done well in college. And our property tax bill is $2000 a year.

You’re very lucky to have had your children go through the meat grinder that is public education today and come out prepared for and able to thrive in college.

Here is an article that cuts to the heart of my issues with public education (in MA and elsewhere).

Pressure Cooker Kindergarten

But we are testing them so much that I barely have time to teach the curriculum. These are 5- and 6-year-olds, and there is so little time for them to be kids.”

“I have heard stories of kids having what they call psychotic breakdowns in kindergarten, kids who are distressed because they are ‘kindergarten failures’ because they can’t read and they can’t write,”

Then came the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, which links federal funding for schools to performance on standardized tests beginning in the third grade.

The state’s Education Reform Act of 1993 led to the establishment of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment Tests (MCAS), given to all public school students in the state every year from Grade 3 through 8 and in Grade 10, to identify schools and districts where student performance is not improving and to hold those schools accountable by state watchdogs.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 14:19:46

Around here, the best public districts have one thing…….the TAX BASE to support them. Especially those future Sports and television stars……

Like the $60 million dollar, 18,000 seat High School football field in Allen, Texas…..

http://tinyurl.com/6go73hx

(My cousin drove me by this monstrosity last week when I was in DFW. This country is too f##ked to fix…….)

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 14:44:16

“I have heard stories of kids having what they call psychotic breakdowns in kindergarten, kids who are distressed because they are ‘kindergarten failures’ because they can’t read and they can’t write,”

Slim here. And I confess that I was a kindergarten failure.

I questioned the wording of the questions on the reading readiness test that we had to take at the end of the school year. And the teacher got angry and flunked me.

Mom marched over to the kindergarten, demanded to see a copy of the test, and lo and behold, the questions were very poorly worded. Next Mom-march was over to the elementary school where she enrolled me in first grade.

Guess who was the first kid in the first grade class to learn how to read? Moi.

And guess who is still very skeptical about standardized tests? The Slim family, that’s who.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2012-04-23 21:06:36

“Around here, the best public districts have one thing…….the TAX BASE to support them. Especially those future Sports and television stars……

Like the $60 million dollar, 18,000 seat High School football field in Allen, Texas…..”

Yep. What qualifies as high priority these days is absolutely vomit inducing. I’ve lost a lot of faith in this country.

 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 08:43:15

The debt markets are getting their take through student loans. The debt market doesn’t care whether it gets paid from houses or from student loans, just that as many members of the population are paying off debt.

Not so good for the RE portion of FIRE, but quite good for the FI portion.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 09:51:40

Broken down by occupation, young college graduates were heavily represented in jobs that require a high school diploma or less.

Been there myself. And that was back in the yuppified early 1980s, when working Joe Jobs was highly stigmatized.

It left me with a lasting resentment toward yuppies.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-04-23 09:58:06

Discussion on NPR today how if Congress doesn’t act soon, new federal undergrad school loan interest rates for income-eligible students will rise from the current 3.4% to 6.8%.

Typical liberal arguments of “low income college students can’t afford higher rates”. Typical conservative arguments of “this program costs too much and it impacts a small percentage of the total student loan market (because of the income-requirements). No where was it discussed, until an astute caller brought it up, how and why college tuition costs were rising at double digit rates: 500% since 1985.

The availability of cheap credit guaranteed by the government…

Of course, no one discusses the fact that those loans are not dis charged in bankruptcy. A trillion dollar abomination with consequences as dire as the housing bubble.

Comment by 2banana
2012-04-23 10:45:28

Colleges were cheap 25 years ago when the Federal government did little or nothing with the student loan industry.

Since then - the feds have done much (they now guarantee nearly all student loans, you can get student loans if you can fog a mirror, the limit on what you can borrow had gone up exponentially, it is only fair, etc.)

And guess what happened?

The rate of college inflation is double and triple that of everything else.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Northeastener
2012-04-23 11:18:48

Exactly. What drove housing prices to unsustainable levels? Cheap financing and poor underwriting: the availability of credit and the ability to offload the risk of default. Of course, you have to have borrowers who glossed over the risk, only looking at the potential profit side of the equation.

Each of those elements is present in higher education: government backed loans, easy underwriting standards, low interest rates, a mainstream meme about how critical college education is to participate in the new economy…

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-04-23 11:30:29

You are outlining the source of a Thanksgiving argument around the table. My in-laws seemed to think I was diminishing the value of education by saying that government needed to do less, not more to help people get a college degree.

What I was really saying is that the subsidies provided to get college educations were driving education inflation.

When I compared it to healthcare inflation (caused in part by overconsumption by people who are not bearing any of the marginal costs), some people’s heads exploded around the table, and I was accused of being an economist.

Silly supply and demand effects.

 
Comment by Localandlord
2012-04-23 17:32:42

I took a back route through our state U the other day and was boggled by the amount of new infrastructure. First rate athletic buildings, a perfectly functional theater being torn down to make new - ditto for the student center. The stadium was no longer a crumbling edifice but had been upgraded to give the effect of the upscale athletic temple. Very striking.

So that’s where the tuition increases are going.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 19:16:09

So that’s where the tuition increases are going.

You have a kindred spirit here in Tucson. I notice the same thing going on at the University of Arizona.

Not just a Tucson thing either. Check out the EduBubble blog. Much talk about Campus Mahals.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 19:30:55

“And guess what happened?”

I’m guessing college became more ‘affordable,’ same as housing did when they loaded up the mortgage lending system with federally guaranteed subprime loans…

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 19:34:06

“What drove housing prices to unsustainable levels? Cheap financing and poor underwriting: the availability of credit and the ability to offload the risk of default.”

Most amazingly, the geniuses at the Fed and other top government policymakers are in utter denial about this. They will probably conduct a bunch of very carefully researched studies and come out with these ‘findings’ five years from now as though they were bringing to light some kind of amazing revelation.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-04-23 21:21:16

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-09/u-s-universities-feast-on-federal-student-aid-virginia-postrel.html

The politicians as usual have fingers in their ears…”la, la, la, la”.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 11:16:58

Northeasterner, are those rates grandfathered in for existing loans? Imagine paying inflated prices for school because the school knew that loan rates were low, and then having to pay the higher loan rates.

2banana, stop it. States didn’t have much to do with student loans? No sh!t — they had everything to do with the actually educating students. 25 years ago, people had JOBS and paid state taxes which paid for state colleges. Now that the jobs have been outsourced, states don’t have the income to keep the colleges going. Hence the loans.

In addition, all those state residents who were working 25 years ago and paying taxes, are no longer paying taxes, for various reasons. And a third thing: since all the low-skill jobs were outsourced/insourced, there are few jobs to go to out of high school, and kids pretty have to go to college to compete with anyone their age. Private college were never cheap, btw.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 11:47:53

Now that the jobs have been outsourced, states don’t have the income to keep the colleges going. Hence the loans.

During the past 10 years here in the Centennial State we’ve been going from budget crisis to budget crisis, year after year. They can’t raise taxes because of TABOR and as a result funding for our state U’s ans JC’s has taken it on the chin. Tuition has gone from $2k a year to as much as 9K. In a few more years its projected that the state U’s will receive zero funding from the state gov’t. Colorado State U has considered privatizing so they can charge more, as they are restricted by law as to big tuition increases can be (meanwhile, knuckle headed, pandering politicians want to lower the rate illegals pay at the state schools)

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-04-23 12:55:42

Based on the comments by the panel, my understanding was that existing loans were locked in with the lower rates, but new loans would have the higher rates. Of course, if you’re only part-way through your college career, you’ll end up seeing your new loans with a higher rate.

 
 
Comment by Hard Rain
2012-04-23 13:26:06

Interesting the topic of education costs comes up today. I am in the process of scanning old family documents and most of my ancestors attended Harvard . I have tuition bills in front of me from 1801 and 1901, the quarterly payments averaged about 30 dollars in 1801, and in 1901 about a hundred. Maybe the government didn’t provide loans back then.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 19:29:27

Not gonna happen.

April 23, 2012, 7:06 pm
Romney Backs Extending Low Interest Rates on Student Loans

By ASHLEY PARKER

CHESTER TOWNSHIP, Pa. — Mitt Romney circled back at the end of a brief news conference Monday afternoon to clarify an issue he had failed to mention before: his support of a temporary extension of a low interest rate on federal student loans, which President Obama also favors.

“There’s one thing I want to mention that I forgot to mention at the very beginning, and that was that particularly with the mention of the number of college graduates that can’t find work or that can only find work well beneath their skill level, I fully support the effort to extend the low interest rate on student loans,” Mr. Romney said. “There was some concern that that would expire halfway through the year, and I support extending the temporary relief on interest rates for students as a result of – as a result of student loans, obviously – in part because of the extraordinarily poor conditions in the job market.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 21:53:22

I’ve not seen this angle discussed, but one of the reasons college tuition keeps going up, is that during the boom many schools decided to build new business schools, new student centers, new sports complexes, new apartment dormitories, new on-campus restaurants, new theaters, new parking structures, etc., thus significantly tapping into foundational and investment funds that formerly went for scholarships and operational expenses.

The competition for students and “rankings” seemingly required newer and more technologically sophisticated classroom and campus facilities, and these, as we know, cost huge (and many would argue, unnecessary and irrelevant,) amounts of money to fund.

Just as student loans are an onerous drain on future resources of the graduates, so are the massive building loans taken out by colleges and universities to build the facilities to attract them. Coupled with lowered property tax bases and dwindling alumni donations, the tuition costs to future students could only go up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-04-24 00:08:58

I was thinking this angle as well, a. Other than the main buildings, my alma mater is unrecognizable from its former self.

They even knocked down my former (fully functioning) residence hall to make greenspace after having planned a $20M renovation of the dormitory. Given how many new buildings went UP, I can’t imagine how much it’s costing them…as long as rates stay low everything should be fine, right?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 04:36:58

Donation! Will do, Ben.

 
Comment by Jess from upstate SC
2012-04-23 05:35:29

sure, and thanks for the good work . Snow is hitting the ground here in the mountains , maybe we’ll get that winter ,yet.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 06:42:50

Supposed to be a strong spring storm.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 07:56:26

In the northeast, we got our all of our winter out of the way one day last October when 2′ of wet snow fell on green leafed trees. Not a flake of snow since. But that’s typical and normal because the teevee said so. And the utilities? They were out to lunch too and were entirely unprepared for the winter event in the summer while “rate payers” tore each others eyes out in the aisles to get to the last loaf of bread.

Do you think they’ll reimburse me for the $2500 I had to spend on a generator because their service sucks so badly?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 05:44:58

Done. Give a hint later in the week if you are coming out alright…

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 08:07:33

+1

Comment by Patrick
2012-04-23 10:29:57

+2

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 05:47:46

Apparently lots of former middle-class Californians have given up in recent years on California dreamin’.

Published: April 21, 2012 7:46 a.m.
The Great California Exodus
By Allysia Finley / The Wall Street Journal

‘California is God’s best moment,” says Joel Kotkin. “It’s the best place in the world to live.” Or at least it used to be.

Mr. Kotkin, one of the nation’s premier demographers, left his native New York City in 1971 to enroll at the University of California, Berkeley. The state was a far-out paradise for hipsters who had grown up listening to the Mamas & the Papas’ iconic “California Dreamin’” and the Beach Boys’ “California Girls.” But it also attracted young, ambitious people “who had a lot of dreams, wanted to build big companies.” Think Intel, Apple and Hewlett-Packard.

Now, however, the Golden State’s fastest-growing entity is government and its biggest product is red tape. The first thing that comes to many American minds when you mention California isn’t Hollywood or tanned girls on a beach, but Greece. Many progressives in California take that as a compliment since Greeks are ostensibly happier. But as Mr. Kotkin notes, Californians are increasingly pursuing happiness elsewhere.

Nearly four million more people have left the Golden State in the last two decades than have come from other states. This is a sharp reversal from the 1980s, when 100,000 more Americans were settling in California each year than were leaving. According to Mr. Kotkin, most of those leaving are between the ages of 5 and 14 or 34 to 45. In other words, young families.

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 06:08:51

So young families or potential young families are baling on CA. No need for infant diapers anymore but shipments of Depends to CA escalating.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 06:35:32

No worries for Pampers Inc. Plenty of babies still being born to illegals.

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 06:50:43

I lived in CA in the mid 1990s and it was finished then as a place with opportunity for the average person.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2012-04-23 07:34:23

Left there 3 months ago, and have already saved 6k in rent and taxes. It’s nice, but not that nice.

Comment by jane
2012-04-23 21:32:02

Russ, where did you wind up going? - not meaning to be nosy of course.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2012-04-23 07:58:02

What has happened in the last 30 years in California?

Insane taxes, out of control public unions, every insane liberal program enacted, full protection/benefits for illegals, exponential growth of the scope and power of the government…etc.

It is funny how no one who works for a living actually wants to live under big government liberalism/socialism.

And where do these people move?

People vote with their feet.

Texas, Tennessee, Nevada, etc.

What do they have in common?

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 08:02:47

…… gawd yer lame.

 
Comment by polly
2012-04-23 08:18:19

terrible schools?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 08:26:22

Actually, prop 13 keeps property taxes low.

It wasn’t the taxes that drove us out of California, it was:

The insane housing prices
The traffic
The smog
The crime

Places like Nevada and Texas have the traffic, smog and crime too. We never even considered them as destinations. I lived briefly in Texas, the place has even less appeal to me than California, if that’s possible.

A lot of people moved from SoCal to Vegas, probably because it’s relatively close to “home”, thus making weekendcar trips to visit the folks or friends possible. But you couldn’t pay me to live in Vegas, or anyplace with sweltering heat. I remember the last time I was in San Antonio. I was attending a convention in May. I went out for a walk on the Riverwalk one night. It had to be at least 90 degrees with 90% humidity. I showered when I returned to my hotel room. For me, that’s a show stopper, plain and simple. I couldn’t wait to go home. The thought of living in a place like that is simply horrifying to me.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 08:47:43

“Actually, prop 13 keeps property taxes low.”

Only if you are locked in to a pre-Housing Bubble property tax basis…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:05:45

“Only if you are locked in to a pre-Housing Bubble property tax basis…”

True. If you paid 600K for a shack the tax bill would be 6K per year. But that is because of high property values and not “insane taxes”. We were paying 2K a year on our shack in Escondido and we would still be paying that if we still owned it.

 
 
Comment by butters
2012-04-23 09:10:55

I wouldn’t mind Austin even with that kind of temperature. Outside of Austin, TX is not worth mentioning.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2012-04-23 12:11:27

You can still get a house on the beach for less than $100k in Texas.

 
 
Comment by Doghouse Riley
2012-04-23 14:04:20

Prop 13 is basically another government wealth transfer from the young to the geriatric.

One more reason for the kids to skip out on California.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 08:46:31

“What do they have in common?”

They listen to Rush?

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:15:37

They have above average wage disparity?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2012-04-23 09:56:11

This is class warfare, politics of envy, “progressive” communist Marxist rhetoric.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:02:11

They have extreme weather?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 05:51:06

Though it is still a week early to “sell in May and go away,” he who sells first, sells best.

Stock Futures Slide Amid Debt, Economic Worries
By Adam Samson
Published April 23, 2012
FOXBusiness

Stock-index futures followed European markets deep into the red on Monday as traders fretted about political developments that threaten to derail progress on fighting Europe’s debt crisis and weak economic data.

Today’s Markets

As of 8:18 a.m. ET, Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell 135 points to 12853, S&P 500 futures dipped 14.9 points to 1360 and Nasdaq 100 futures dropped 24 points to 2650.

Market participants had a slew of headlines from across the globe to digest to kick off what may be a busy trading week.

Markit’s eurozone PMI gauge suggested the 17-member currency bloc’s economic output contracted at the swiftest pace in five months in April. The measure came in at 47.4, down from 49.1 in March. Readings above 50 point to expansion, while those below indicate contraction.

Germany, Europe’s powerhouse economy, saw activity in its important manufacturing sector contract at a the swiftest pace in 33 months. Meanwhile, France’s key service-sector activity slumped to a six-month low.

“Germany’s economy continued to rest on a knife edge of recession in April, with modest service sector growth only just counterbalancing the escalating manufacturing downturn,” Tim Moore, a senior economist at Markit said in a note accompanying the data.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 05:54:43

Got Treasurys?

ft dot com
April 23, 2012 1:16 pm
Eurozone angst spooks investors
By Hugh Carnegy in Paris, Matt Steinglass in Amsterdam and FT Markets reporters

Markets reacted nervously on Monday to the socialists’ first-round victory in France’s presidential election, as the eurozone crisis claimed another victim on Monday with the collapse of the Dutch government.

Analysis of François Hollande’s early lead – and the strategy he and Nicolas Sarkozy might adopt towards the far-right National Front’s unexpectedly large support – came amid a flood of statistical data underlining the tenacity of the eurozone’s problems.

The European Union’s statistics office said that although the 17 member states of the eurozone had reduced their deficits from 6.2 per cent of gross domestic product in 2010 to 4.1 per cent in 2011, overall debt still rose 1.9 percentage points to 87.2 per cent of GDP – the highest since the euro was created in 1999.

In The Netherlands, Mark Rutte, prime minister, will tender his government’s resignation at a meeting with Queen Beatrix later on Monday, clearing the way for elections.

Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 06:33:52

Why does it matter who wins France? If the financial powers the be don’t like the winner, they’ll just boot him out like the did in Greece. Actual votes of actual French citizens be damned.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 06:56:36

You have problem with Corporate Communist Capitalism?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 05:57:38

Greek tragedy continues…

The Associated Press April 20, 2012, 3:56PM ET
Bond swap hammers Greek banks
By DEREK GATOPOULOS and NICHOLAS PAPHITIS
ATHENS, Greece

Four major Greek banks on Friday announced combined losses of (EURO)28 billion ($36.9 billion) in 2011, hammered by a recent bond-swap deal between Greece and with private creditors that leaves local lenders in pressing need of promised bailout money.

Although the debt restructuring occurred this year, Greece’s National Bank, Alpha Bank, Eurobank and Piraeus Bank incorporated the losses into last year’s results.

Hardest hit was National Bank, the largest Greek lender by assets, which said it had suffered an operating loss of (EURO)289 million ($381.25 million) last year, but a total loss of (EURO)12.3 billion ($16.23 billion) when including the damage from the debt swap.

“It is clear that the Greek banking system is suffering the consequences of the fiscal crisis,” NBG’s CEO Apostolos Tamvakakis said in a statement.

“It faces losses that amount to tens of billions of euros, mainly because of the debt exchange for Greek government bonds, and relatively smaller sums … from anticipated future losses in banks’ loan portfolios.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 06:00:23

Intelligent Investing
4/19/2012 @ 12:58PM
Beware: A Chinese Recession Is Coming
A. Gary Shilling, Contributor

This story appears in the May 7, 2012 edition of Forbes magazine.

My Feb. 28, 2011 column predicted that in China “a hard landing is likely” and “a recession in Europe is inevitable.” Both are ­unfolding.

China just reported its slowest quarter of GDP growth since 2009, with the economy growing at an 8.1% annualized clip from January through March of 2012, down from 8.9% in the final three months of 2011. Growth has been slipping steadily from the 11.9% pace in the first quarter of 2010, and Beijing seems unable to stop the slide at this stage of the game.

China’s response to the Great ­Recession was massive fiscal stimulus that amounted to more than 12% of GDP, twice the relative size of the U.S. package. Shock therapy worked last time around for China, nearly doubling GDP growth within a year, but it came with strong inflationary side effects. Food prices rose by double-digit percentages, stinging Chinese who live on subsistence ­incomes. Stocks stunk, Chinese savers couldn’t invest abroad, and banks paid negative deposit rates.

Housing boomed, since alternative investments were few, but prices rose beyond the reach of many would-be buyers. So the government tightened property financing.

They got what they wanted: House prices fell for the fifth consecutive month in February. Don’t look for a turnaround. Premier Wen ­Jiabao said in March that house prices “are still a long way from an appropriate level.”

Meanwhile, China’s central bank hiked bank reserve requirements from 15.5% in early 2010 to 21.5% last year. That’s a caveman tactic and amounts to credit allocation. The People’s Bank raised rates only 1.25 percentage points to keep cheap loans flowing to inefficient state-owned enterprises that ­employ around a quarter of Chinese and produce 45% of GDP.

What chance does the nonindependent Chinese central bank have in ­effecting a soft landing when the ­independent U.S. Fed, with all its ­sophisticated tools, tried 12 times in the post-World War II era to cool the economy and avoided a recession only once, in the mid-1990s?

Manufacturing is already in ­contraction, along with retail sales. Exports dominate consumer spending, which is a tiny 34% of GDP. In Brazil it’s 58%, 60% in India, 58% in Germany and 71% in the U.S.

Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 06:30:39

This doesn’t make much sense to me. Am I to understand that China depends on 8% growth to stay out of recession? My logic says that they could lose growth down to 0% — that is, break even — and maintain at 0% for at least a year before plunging into recession.

It’s depending on real estate always going up, or productivity always going up. No wonder economic systems are failing. Have they no concept of a ceiling? Failure was baked into the cake since the invention of long division.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 06:39:48

I agree, why does China need 9% growth for everything to be OK?

I suspect that it is as you believe, they need it to keep their bubble economy afloat. But who is supposed to consume all this “growth”? The Foxconn City crowd? Overextended and broke westerners?

Comment by polly
2012-04-23 07:15:25

I thought that the large growth was needed to have jobs for all the young people moving from rural areas to the cities. It isn’t to avoid recession. It is to avoid riots.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ryan
2012-04-23 08:07:38

This was my understanding as well. I wonder how low GDP growth goes before the natives are restless and we see the glimmer coming off the iron fist to meet the restless natives?

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-04-23 08:40:17

Gotta keep the natives from getting too restless.

Apparently there is a lot of unrest in China…the strong growth helps keep the downtrodden content with the boot on their neck.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 09:54:39

There is indeed a lot of unrest in China. Western media doesn’t cover much of it, but it is indeed there.

 
Comment by Steve J
2012-04-23 12:12:43

The lack of women isn’t helping either.

 
 
Comment by measton
2012-04-23 08:47:54

why does China need 9% growth for everything to be OK?

Ask all the countries that export commodities to China. Crashing commodities will reveal deflation. Central bankers hate deflation.

I’d also consider that when China says they have a 5% GDP growth it’s really much less.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 06:58:03

China? Not so much. The foreign corporations? Well, duh.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-04-23 08:05:12

Consider that a huge component of Chinese “GDP” is government spending, that official government statistics are most likely not true, and that they may be enjoying the inflation that the US is exporting. Their productive economy may actually shrinking.

I haven’t read anything indicating that their consumption of raw materials or electricity is on the rise, nor that they are populating those empty cities. Building useless things improverishes, but GDP numbers look good.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 06:03:29

Euro zone slump deepens unexpectedly in April
By Andy Bruce
LONDON | Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:01am EDT
An illustration picture shows a one Euro coin being melted by a smith in Skopje, December 6, 2011. REUTERS/Ognen Teofilovski

(Reuters) - The euro zone’s business slump deepened at a far faster pace than expected in April, suggesting the economy will stay in recession at least until the second half of the year.

Chinese factories enjoyed their best performance this year, the latest purchasing managers indexes (PMIs) also showed on Monday, but economists focused on the euro zone’s grim outlook which was worse than any projection in a Reuters poll.

The Markit PMI fell to 47.9 from 49.2 in March, a five-month low and confounding the forecast for a rise to 49.3.

Optimism from this weekend’s deal to boost the International Monetary Fund’s crisis-fighting firepower quickly evaporated and worried investors sold the euro and bought safe-haven German and U.S. government bonds.

“Today’s dismal PMI figures clearly indicate that the euro zone economy remains in dire straits,” said Martin Van Vliet, senior economist at ING.

“Our base case scenario is still for a gradual return to modestly positive growth in the second half of this year, but with the lingering debt crisis and the ongoing drag from fiscal policy, the risks are clearly skewed to a more protracted recession.”

European factories had their worst month since June 2009. Companies said their order books were shrinking and they were cutting jobs in reaction to falling demand.

The overall index slipped further below the 50 threshold that divides growth from contraction.

Politics added to the sense of concern about Europe on Monday. France’s presidential election was thrown wide open by the surprisingly high score of a far-right candidate in the first round vote while the Dutch government was set to resign in a crisis over budget cuts.

LOSING MOMENTUM

The United States is the only Western economy making a significant contribution to global economic growth but surprisingly weak employment data last week raised questions about whether this will continue.

 
Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 06:10:42

Done, Ben.

You, this blog, and the motley cure that dwells here have been my lighthouse since 2006.

- Realtors are liars
- Cash is king
- Drink box wine (measure carefully!)

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 07:24:09

And don’t forget…… deadbeats.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 08:12:10

You just gave me a funny idea for an 80s cover band with a weird setlist…maybe Dread Zeppelin-ish. Huh huh…Motley Cure. They would do songs from either band, but always in the style of the other band.

 
Comment by Doghouse Riley
2012-04-23 14:05:37

Feed the squirrels.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 06:15:36

Homebuilder Outlook Plunges, Reversing Spring Rebound
Published: Monday, 16 Apr 2012 | 10:00 AM ET
By: Diana Olick
CNBC Real Estate Reporter

In a stark reversal during the heart of the spring housing market, confidence among the nation’s homebuilders dropped in April to levels not seen since January.

An association index measuring sentiment fell three points, changing course after seven straight months of gains.

It now stands at twenty-five; fifty is the line between positive and negative sentiment.

“What we’re seeing is essentially a pause in what had been a fairly rapid build-up in builder confidence that started last September,” said National Association of Home Builders Chief Economist David Crowe in a release.

“This is partly because interest expressed by buyers in the past few months has yet to translate into expected sales activity, but is also reflective of the ongoing challenges that are slowing the housing recovery—particularly tight credit conditions for builders and buyers, competition from foreclosures and problems with obtaining accurate appraisals,” the release goes on to say.

The three components of the index each posted a decline, both current sales and sales expectations down three points and buyer traffic down four points from March.

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 08:15:08

Let me guess…people are starting to think about buying, but only at prices that compete with foreclosures. Somebody saw the interest and assumed it was at full bubble pricing?

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 09:58:53

“This is partly because interest expressed by buyers in the past few months has yet to translate into expected sales activity, but is also reflective of the ongoing challenges that are slowing the housing recovery—particularly tight credit conditions for builders and buyers, competition from foreclosures and problems with obtaining accurate appraisals,” the release goes on to say.

Slim here. Let me explain a couple of terms:

Interest: We in the big, small, and micro business world hear this all the time. Someone’s interested in what we sell. Well, that’s lovely. We’re rarin’ to sell it to you.

Sales: What happens when one or more interested people bust out the checkbook, the credit card, the PayPal, or the cash and actually buy what we’re selling. This group of people is a lot smaller than the first.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 06:18:15

Regulator seeks speedier action on troubled US mortgages
WASHINGTON | Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:38pm EDT

(Reuters) - The regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Tuesday announced a new policy that aims to speed up the process mortgage servicers apply when dealing with distressed loans backed by the two U.S. government-run companies.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency said it has directed both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to develop “enhanced and aligned strategies” for securing a so-called short sale, in which the servicer or bank accepts less than the balance owed on a property, the regulator said in a statement.

FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco said the new policy will “prevent foreclosures, keep homes occupied and help maintain stable communities.”

Short sales often benefit neighborhoods clear out stagnant properties that may have a negative impact on home values that have already dropped more than 30 percent from their peak in 2006. The Obama administration has urged the mortgage industry to make such sales instead of starting the foreclosure process.

The new timeline will require servicers, who collect borrowers’ mortgage payments, to respond to a request for a short sale within 30 days and to make a final decision on the property at the end of 60 days.

The banks will also need to give weekly updates to any borrowers that might be aided by the short sale if the offer is under review.

The short sale effort will begin in June and then progress in stages as the mortgage industry reviews the new policy, FHFA said.

Comment by The UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-04-23 07:34:36

“The Federal Housing Finance Agency said it has directed both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to develop “enhanced and aligned strategies” for securing a so-called short sale,”

Short sales expected to surge this year

By Les Christie @CNNMoney April 19, 2012: 5:13 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Short sales are rising sharply, offering many struggling homeowners a better alternative to foreclosure in many of the nation’s hardest hit states.

House flipping is back

The rich walk away: Million-dollar foreclosures

It’s safe to sell your home again

Also helping to speed things along is the government’s Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative program, which launched in late 2009, according to Charlie Engel, a spokesman for RealtyTrac,

The program pays incentives to those who sell their home in a short sale rather than let it fall into foreclosure.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/19/real_estate/short-sale-rise/index.htm - 61k -

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 06:23:26

Silence can be deafening.

March 28, 2012, 7:04 PM
Geithner: Fannie and Freddie Favor Loan Write-Downs
By Alan Zibel and Jeffrey Sparshott

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Wednesday he believes that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac favor writing down loan balances for troubled U.S. homeowners, despite resistance from their regulator.

Geithner’s remarks at a Senate subcommittee hearing add fuel to an ongoing debate over whether the government-controlled mortgage finance firms will reduce loan balances. They also highlight frustration among top Obama administration officials about their inability to influence the regulator of the mortgage giants, the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

“I think Fannie and Freddie themselves are actually pretty supportive of this,” Mr. Geithner said. Their regulator, he said “has been a little more conservative.”

The Obama administration has stepped up pressure on the regulator for Fannie and Freddie to grant reductions, which it doesn’t currently allow. In January, officials said they would triple the amount of taxpayer money that investors — including Fannie and Freddie – receive when they reduce loan balances.

The housing regulator, along with executives at Fannie and Freddie, has been evaluating the incentives the administration has offered. But the agency’s acting director, Edward DeMarco, has resisted doing so, saying that it may not make economic sense for Fannie and Freddie and could encourage more borrowers to default.

An FHFA spokeswoman did not comment on Geithner’s remarks but said the agency plans to make a decision on the incentives next month. Representatives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac declined to comment.

Mr. Geithner’s remarks underscore how tensions between the administration and Mr. DeMarco have grown in recent months.

“We have been encouraging Fannie and Freddie to take another look at the math, the economics of it,” Mr. Geithner said. ”We think there is a strong case in some circumstances to add principal reduction as part of their strategy to maximize return to the taxpayer.”

Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 07:30:12

In spring 2010, Timmy had his visible altercation with Elizabeth Warren during a hearing with the Congressional Oversight Committee. Warren wanted something to be done about massive foreclosures, and Geithner responded that they couldn’t stop all foreclosures because (paraphrased) “they can’t save everybody.” (Unfortunately I can’t find a good source for it, but it was big news at the time.) Now, Geithner wants write-downs. So, did Geithner change his mind? Did somebody pull his strings? Or is he still being internally consistent by advocating writedowns only under “some circumstances?” What would these circumstances be? Reporters have yet to ask.

On another note, it seems that Ed DeMarco at FHFA is the only one even mentioning the optics of this giant moral hazard. At the end of the day when the math is done, writedowns may decrease the overall taxpayer losses. But with numbers this big and debt so fuzzy, what does “overall taxpayer losses” mean? Nothing, likely, since we borrow it from China anyway. Meanwhile, Joe Motorboat and Jane Boobjob next door rub their $51K cramdown in your face.

Which would you rather have: a few billion more in “taxpayer loss”, or Joe and Jane getting kicked to the curb as their just desserts?

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 07:51:07

Joe BassBoat and Jane BoobJob. Nice.

…… hey….. aren’t they the two snarky, arrogant douchebags who said they were semi-retired back in 2006?

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 08:19:40

Hey, they’ve had some good times on that boat. And best of all she doesn’t even need a lifevest.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-04-23 09:08:12

If the implants are filled with saline, they should be neutrally boyant. Real ones float because they are mostly fat.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:19:09

So that’s one way of spotting the “bionic” gals at the pool. :-)

 
Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 09:34:24

The mrs’s bionic boobs don’t float or sink…. they just look good. Really good.

 
 
 
Comment by measton
2012-04-23 08:51:28

Now, Geithner wants write-downs. So, did Geithner change his mind? Did somebody pull his strings?

Could it be that the banks initially wanted the properties, ie maybe many had some equity, but now realize that taking over the title won’t fix their problems.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 10:01:02

Now, Geithner wants write-downs. So, did Geithner change his mind? Did somebody pull his strings?

He’s already announced that he’s going to be leaving the Obama Administration in January. Perhaps he’s been told that his resignation letter could be accepted sooner. As in, at any time.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2012-04-23 08:03:37

More free obama money.

For renters and those who pay their mortgage - you get jack and squat.

Wonder how many are going to now stop paying to take advantage of the free obama bucks.

And yes - many bankers are evil and need to be in jail.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 08:43:46

Wonder how many are going to now stop paying to take advantage of the free obama bucks.

I’ll believe it when I see it. This isn’t the first time they promised free money to underwater homedebtors.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 12:48:01

I remember quite a few stories posted here a while back about folks who stopped paying their mortgages thinking that would be the ticket to free money, only to learn otherwise a few months later when a Notice of Default was sent their way from the lender.

I’m sure this time is different, though…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 08:56:20

“Wonder how many are going to now stop paying to take advantage of the free obama bucks.”

This is a question I have tried to find the answer to, with no luck so far: Can F&F mortgagees still qualify for write downs if they stop paying their mortgages now, or was there a cutoff date?

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-04-23 08:58:16

Geez, didyaknow that Germany also has bank$ that have the IMPLICIT backing of the German Gov’t? (inconceivable! Frank & Franziska?) Really, they do, google it.

“My oh my, its trouble$ that makes the monkey’$ chew on red pepper$!” ;-)

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 11:55:06

April 2, 2012, 11:51 AM

Is Mortgage-Debt Forgiveness Worth the ‘Moral Hazard’?
By Nick Timiraos

It’s been one of the most vexing problems of the mortgage crisis: Do policies to restructure loans for underwater borrowers encourage homeowners who don’t need help to default?

The federal regulator for mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said creating such a “moral hazard” is one of his top concerns now that the Treasury Department has offered to subsidize the costs of debt forgiveness for loans backed by the firms.

“What I’m really worried about is what happens if you put an incentive shift out there that says, ‘If you can demonstrate hardship, you can have your debt forgiven,’” said Edward DeMarco, the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal.

Right now, about three-quarters of homeowners who are deeply underwater on mortgages backed by Fannie and Freddie are still making payments. (“Underwater” borrowers owe more than their homes are worth.)

There’s been little research on the subject, in part because the speed and depth of the housing price-crash of the past five years has little national precedent.

One study suggests such concerns aren’t without reason. In 2008, Bank of America agreed to modify mortgages in a settlement related to allegedly predatory lending practices at Countrywide Financial Corp. A study published in January 2011 by economists at Columbia University concluded that Countrywide’s relative delinquency rate “increased substantially…during the months immediately after the public announcement of settlement.”

Moreover, the borrowers most likely to default after that announcement “were the borrowers least likely to default otherwise.”

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 06:26:15

April 23, 2012, 8:39 a.m. EDT
Gold falls on dollar gains, Europe, China worries
By Barbara Kollmeyer, MarketWatch

MADRID (MarketWatch) — Gold and silver prices fell in electronic trade during Monday business hours in Europe, as the dollar rose on risk aversion amid worrying political developments in the euro zone and as China data showed continued contraction for the manufacturing sector.

Gold for June delivery (GCM2 -0.95%) fell $13 to $1,629.80 an ounce, down from the contract’s settlement at $1,642.80 Friday on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, losing 1% on the week.

Comment by combotechie
2012-04-23 06:34:10

“Gold and silver prices fell … as the dollar rose on risk aversion …”

Gold fell and the dollar rose because of risk aversion?

Useless, unbacked fiats ROSE in value and gold, the only true money, FELL?

Lol.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 06:41:02

The trend is your friend.

How much was gold worth 5 years ago?

Comment by palmetto
2012-04-23 06:45:45

ED ZACHARY!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by combotechie
2012-04-23 06:49:24

How much was real estate worth five years ago?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 07:15:24

How much was food five years ago?

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-04-23 11:25:44

Food cost more five years ago because ipads are cheaper now and there is no inflation.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 07:37:00

To answer seriously? About $680 nominal USD. Look up Gold Price in Wiki, they have a nice chart.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2012-04-23 08:40:30

It was in the $200s when I started watching it.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:22:27

The thing about gold is that it is rather portable. If the Chinese choose to hoard it, it’s fairly easy to load it on a plane or a ship for transport to China or wherever they decide to stash (hide) it.

Don’t try that with a house.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 06:28:09

Index Futures:
S&P 500 1,361.00 -14.25 -1.04%
DOW 12,854 -134.00 -1.03%
NASDAQ 2,651 -23.00 -0.86%

There’s a slump in future(s)

Europe’s politics and lagging manufacturing in China filter into U.S. stock futures.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 06:29:44

Would now be a good time to buy the dip?

Comment by palmetto
2012-04-23 06:34:16

dipdipdipdipdipdipdipdipdipdipdipdipdipdip get a job…

Comment by palmetto
2012-04-23 06:39:11

Ooops, made a mistake. It should be:

dipdipdipdipdipdipdipdip mum mum mum mum mum mum get a job

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 07:14:36

na-na-na-na-na

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-04-23 07:23:13

“U.S. stocks decline sharply Monday as political uncertainty in Europe casts doubt on the region’s ability to deal with its debt crisis, while, domestically, cereal maker Kellogg cuts its 2012 forecast.”

Funny, I’ve never read that stocks declined mostly because they were priced too high to begin with. But that is clearly the case here.

 
Comment by The UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-04-23 08:18:39

“Would now be a good time to buy the dip?”

I guess it`s a good time to but and flip.

“When we smell mold we say cha-ching”

House flipping is back - Video - Business News
Mar 30, 2012 … With real estate prices possibly bottoming out, investors are starting to buy, fix and flip homes once again.
http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2012/03/30/n_house_flipping.cnnmoney/ - 42k - Cached -

Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 08:54:28

In the DC area it never went out of style. When I was househunting I saw two homes which had granite countertops slopped over 1980’s cabinetry, just so they could advertise granite. :roll:

Maybe this is also why even semi-trashed houses are not going down in price — banks are holding off waiting for flippers to compete for potential profits. However, appreciation needs to outpace the cost of the reno, and that ain’t happening yet.

Yesterday I went to — wait for it — HOME DEPOT, and — wait for it — the paint counter was busy. Not terribly busy, but it was raining buckets outside.

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 09:54:16

This obsession with granite is funny in that granite (other than granite curbs and tombstones) is truly ugly due to the color and natural variations of the rock. Granite slabs inside a house doesn’t lend itself to timeless architecture. Besides, once it cracks(and it will), the entire slab gets replaced.(that is if you haven’t stripped it out because it’s sheer ugliness a’la avacado appliances and shag rugs.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mathguy
2012-04-23 10:41:13

Have to disagree with you on this. Nicely sealed granite wears nicely. It’s the grout on tiled kitchen counters that gets stained over time that looks ugly. The formica counters were popular for a while becuase they avoided the whole tile grout issue. They just wore poorly and were backed by particle board that fell apart if it got wet. Now there is also the fake granite which looks like a nice option as well. As long as you get a nice piee of homogenized granite without the gold /quarts sparkle ripples, I think you are set on a nice looking and good wearing kitchen remodel for a good many years.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 10:44:56

Nothing will prevent granite from cracking. NOTHING.

Secondly, it WILL go out of style if it hasn’t already.

Thirdly, there is nothing more durable than epoxy resin. And epoxy resin is timeless as it will never go out of style.

 
Comment by Ryan
2012-04-23 11:24:35

Do you understand how retarded that last statement about epoxy resin never going out of style is? Especially after just stating that the current trend will go out of style?

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 11:28:44

Do you understand what epoxy resin is? What is your background in architecture? Is epoxy resin a fad? Or is granite a fad? How about color?

Let’s hear it architect.

 
Comment by Ryan
2012-04-23 11:43:33

I’m well aware of what epoxy resin is and it’s applications. I’ve used epoxy in several different applications in my career.

Nope no Architect here. I suppose though that you must be?

But if you can predict the future and future home furnishing trends, why bother working at all?

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 11:50:12

“home furnishing trends”?? Really? Really? ;)

Millions of others “have used” epoxy resin too. “Several applications”? mmkay. Instead “using applications”, how about demonstrating where you’ve specified, designed, laid out or installed ANY epoxy resin. Photos would be a real help.

Thanks.

 
Comment by Ryan
2012-04-23 12:01:47

The one that sticks with me most was installing GE LM6000s in Doha, Kuwait. We used Chalkfast to anchor the turbines to the slab as well as the turbines to their housing. If you are interested, feel free to google search the product. I have specifically used the red and orange varieties.

I don’t question the effectiveness of epoxy. I question how you can assert that it will never go out of style in the counter top arena. If you can predict that why not predict something useful? Tell me the winning Powerball numbers for Wednesday’s drawing instead of blathering about epoxy counters.

 
Comment by Ryan
2012-04-23 12:07:47

My last reply didn’t take.

The one that comes to mind the quickest is the use of Chockfast. We used this while installing GE LM6000s in Doha, Kuwait. Specifically the orange variety to anchor the turbines to their housing and the red to anchor the turbines to their slabs. You can search Chockfast if you like.

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 12:14:04

I don’t have to “look it up”.

Chockfast is “an or equal” two part epoxy grout (i.e, portland cement) to Sika’s SikaDur42 for high vibration, rotating equipment applications. It’s not a countertop. Not remotely close.

 
Comment by Steve J
2012-04-23 12:17:41

Interior design is similar to fashion design.

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 12:20:46

….and when you can’t demonstrate one single instance of a typical application (rotating equipment doesn’t cut it), have never specified it, laid it out or installed it or used it for that matter, how would you possibly have any idea of its’ merits?

I think the truth is you have worthless ugly rocks in your kitchen.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2012-04-23 12:21:26

Epoxy resin countertops (for everyone who wants to laugh at this fight) are the black countertops you had in your high school and maybe college science labs.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2012-04-23 12:28:42

You can get them in other colors and styles as well, but the majority share that ‘mess of colors’ look that granite has and is roughly the same price per sq foot.

 
Comment by Ryan
2012-04-23 12:39:11

Epoxy is epoxy. Nobody cares. Neither counter tops nor setting rotating equipment is rocket science.

The fact is and what you continue to avoid answering is that you can’t predict trends counter tops because it is akin to predicting the future.

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 13:14:29

The truth is you care enough about it to conflate a portland cement product with an epoxy resin in order to misrepresent your architectural experience. You’ve already demonstrated you have none and really don’t know what you’re talking about.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 13:20:29

I don’t think that granite or any other material will go out of style. I do think that the extra veiny extra colored granites will go out of style, especially that horrid speckled tan which looks like rat poop strewn around a sandbox. I predict a return to understated solids or muted patterns, in all materials. After periods of excess we always return to the classics.

 
Comment by Middle Coaster
2012-04-23 13:27:23

As Ahansen so aptly pointed out recently, granite countertops have been around for hundreds of years. I believe her specific example was medieval castles. At any rate, those countertops are still there.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 14:08:34

Fred Flintstone had granite countertops.

 
Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 14:16:24

I don’t have to “predict” to know a fad. Granite was a fad and is a poor performing material.

 
Comment by SV guy
2012-04-23 15:50:22

How long you been selling epoxy countertops Ex? ;)

 
Comment by skroodle
2012-04-23 17:54:50

Epoxy resin countertops (for everyone who wants to laugh at this fight) are the black countertops you had in your high school and maybe college science labs.

Maybe in the rich school districts, my school’s were made from soapstone.

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 22:26:08

There are cathedrals, chateaux and farmhouses in Europe with granite floors, walls, and work surfaces that have been there (uncracked, as it turns out,) for many hundreds of years. It’s a highly durable material, and quite literally “timeless” in its appeal.

I’ve used granite and marble countertops all my life and never had any problem with cracking or staining. Perhaps it has to do with workmanship?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by The UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-04-23 07:27:59

Mortgage-Tax Break Curbed by Housing Slump

By Amanda J. Crawford - Apr 20, 2012 12:01 AM ET

The cost of one of the country’s most expensive individual tax breaks is shrinking as the number of Americans who own homes declines and mortgage rates hover near historic lows.

Federal tax filers claimed almost $71 billion less in mortgage interest deductions for 2009 than for 2007, a 14 percent drop, according to the Internal Revenue Service. That trend continued in 2010, the IRS said in a report last month, as preliminary data showed that lower interest rates, home ownership and home prices curbed use of the tax deduction by 7.2 percent.

“People are walking away and losing their homes and they no longer have the mortgage interest deductions,” said Andrew Hanson, an assistant professor of economics at Georgia State University who has researched the tax break. “That’s got to be a big part of it.”

Tax revenue fell as unemployment rose during the most severe recession since the 1930s, and the housing market was shaken by 16 million foreclosures since 2007. On the flip side were gains from declining use of the mortgage deduction, saving the U.S. government $13 billion to $26 billion from 2007 to 2010, according to an estimate from Hanson.

The effects extend to states, more than half of which allow the deductions either on their own or through use of federal itemization. In Arizona, officials say less use of such deductions was behind an 8 percent rise in tax liability for state residents in 2010 even as unemployment climbed to 10.8 percent that year.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-20/mortgage-tax-break-curbed-by-housing-slump-as-states-get-reward.html - 181k -

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 15:29:45

“…and the housing market was shaken by 16 million foreclosures since 2007.”

Is that an accurate figure? And if so, how many have been resold, versus left stranded in shadow inventory limbo?

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2012-04-23 19:52:26

Some of us have refinanced to a lower rate and a shorter amortization schedule.
My interest deduction dropped by about 40%.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 20:05:25

An alternative to explore would be to take out a shorter-term loan with a balloon payment. Not sure whether “financial innovation” has progressed to the point where these are widely available, though.

For instance, one might do better on a 10-year interest-only mortgage (with fully deductible payments) with a balloon payment at the end of the 10 years, meanwhile paying what would have gone to the mortgage into another investment vehicle besides real estate which is not likely to continually decline in value for the next decade. After ten years, pay off the loan with either a new loan or full payment of what is owed, or sell if necessary. Make as large a downpayment as necessary to get your “innovative” lender to go along with the deal.

I’m sure there are regulations that prohibit creative financing schemes like the above, but the idea is at least worth exploring…

 
 
 
Comment by The UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-04-23 07:42:01

The Great California Exodus

A leading U.S. demographer and ‘Truman Democrat’ talks about what is driving the middle class out of the Golden State..

THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW
April 20, 2012, 7:19 p.m. ET

By ALLYSIA FINLEY

‘California is God’s best moment,” says Joel Kotkin. “It’s the best place in the world to live.” Or at least it used to be.

Mr. Kotkin, one of the nation’s premier demographers, left his native New York City in 1971 to enroll at the University of California, Berkeley. The state was a far-out paradise for hipsters who had grown up listening to the Mamas & the Papas’ iconic “California Dreamin’” and the Beach Boys’ “California Girls.” But it also attracted young, ambitious people “who had a lot of dreams, wanted to build big companies.” Think Intel, Apple and Hewlett-Packard.

Now, however, the Golden State’s fastest-growing entity is government and its biggest product is red tape. The first thing that comes to many American minds when you mention California isn’t Hollywood or tanned girls on a beach, but Greece. Many progressives in California take that as a compliment since Greeks are ostensibly happier. But as Mr. Kotkin notes, Californians are increasingly pursuing happiness elsewhere.

Nearly four million more people have left the Golden State in the last two decades than have come from other states. This is a sharp reversal from the 1980s, when 100,000 more Americans were settling in California each year than were leaving. According to Mr. Kotkin, most of those leaving are between the ages of 5 and 14 or 34 to 45. In other words, young families.

“Basically, if you don’t own a piece of Facebook or Google and you haven’t robbed a bank and don’t have rich parents, then your chances of being able to buy a house or raise a family in the Bay Area or in most of coastal California is pretty weak,” says Mr. Kotkin.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304444604577340531861056966.html - 172k

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 08:49:14

“Basically, if you don’t own a piece of Facebook or Google and you haven’t robbed a bank and don’t have rich parents, then your chances of being able to buy a house or raise a family in the Bay Area or in most of coastal California is pretty weak,” says Mr. Kotkin.

I was in Santa Clara a few weeks ago. Tiny condos go for 600K. Pure insanity.

Comment by SV guy
2012-04-23 15:52:39

Santa Clara is ground zero for the H1-B Indians.

Comment by mikeinbend
2012-04-24 05:38:55

My sister is a Veterinarian in San Mateo. She says the industry has been taken over by Indian trained foreigners, and she characterizes them as inept, for the most part. And they seem to all live in Fremont.

Her ex-husband, trained at UCD as well, says the same thing re Indian vets.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-04-23 09:29:51

Nobody goes there anymore. It’s too crowded.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-04-23 12:21:33

:)

When you get to the fork in the road, take it.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 12:58:38

I have a photo of Yogi Berra in my living room. He was talking with my father’s father, who was a sports writer.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2012-04-23 08:13:00

How to bankrupt a city - The promise of easy money and public unions…

There is only one solution of course. Declare bankruptcy, wipe out the debts and cancel the public union contracts.

Coming soon to a city near you…
———————

Here Come the Municipal Bankruptcies
Michigan Capitol Confidential | 4/15/2012 | Anne Schieber

The city of Allen Park has a $2.6 million budget deficit this year and doesn’t know how it’s going to pay for it.

The city is asking taxpayers for more money but they’ve said no before and there’s no reason to believe they’ll be in any more of a mood when the May 8 millage election arrives.

Over the past 10 years, this Detroit suburb of just over 28,000 people suffered from the same malaise afflicting other Michigan cities. Its population dropped, in this case, 4 percent. Property values shrunk nearly 50 percent. Instead of doubling down by restructuring and cutting expenses, the city made a bet: Enticed by a state law requiring taxpayers to reimburse movie producers 42 percent of their expenses of movies shot in Michigan, the city decided to get into the movie business.

Without voter approval or an appraisal, Allen Park bought an old Visteon plant (originally Montgomery Ward’s main distribution center) to turn into a movie making enterprise to be called Unity Studios. It paid nearly $40 million for the property and improvements.

The movie studio never happened. There was no grand opening. No job fair. No prospects to pay off the millions of dollars in bonds the city sold to buy the property.

Bob Armstead and a number of angry residents have since spent countless hours trying to figure out how taxpayers were hoodwinked. He calculates that the city will be stuck with the mess for 28 years and ultimately it will cost taxpayers more than $100 million.

“I think it’s needed. I think it’s a wakeup call for everybody,” Sisko said at the March 13th council meeting. Council members were especially dismayed when the city’s biggest unions, those representing police officers and firefighters, refused to reopen their contracts for concessions.

The contracts have been a special irritant to taxpayers. Firefighters and police can retire at age 52, can factor in the best three of 10 years in salaries for pension formulas and receive full medical, dental and optical care for life. Members of the two unions contribute 6 percent of their salary to the pension program. According to the attorney representing the firefighters’ union, the city owes the pension fund $26 million and has no money set aside to pay for retiree health benefits.

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 09:14:58

So your wife ran off with a public service worker. Was he an equipment operator? Fireman? Water utility foreman? Come clean with us.

Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 11:58:23

“Was he an equipment operator?”

Probably a heavy equipment operator.

ZING!

Comment by exeter
2012-04-23 12:05:59

lmao

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 22:36:05

Nice, mugs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by The UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-04-23 13:54:57

“So your wife ran off with a public service worker. Was he an equipment operator? Fireman? Water utility foreman?”

A State Trooper remember, that`s why he was going 150mph in his new Corvette. He thought the State Trooper was trying to bring her back 15 years later.

Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 15:31:48

lmao…. thank you for the reminder of that joke Unknown Jethro.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2012-04-23 12:20:58

I don’t know why the firefighters/policeman won’t voluntarily lower thier pensions to make up for a boondoggle commissioned by city politicians.

Where is thier team spirit?

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-04-23 12:33:45

http://www.iaff1604.org/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&homeID=201843

“FIREFIGHTERS PENSION SYSTEM UNDER ATTACK IN WASHINGTON STATE

In the latest move again public employees unions, fire and police pensions are under attack in Washington state, as Republican legislators in both the state Senate and House move to cut funding to pension systems. The result is a literally “raiding” of the LEOFF 2 funds. The Senate and House budget plans will reduce contributions to the LEOFF 2 fund, creating a $75 million dollar shortfall. The action also undermines the authority of the LEOFF 2 Board and ignores Initiative 790 that Washington state voters passed in support of their firefighters and police officers. This is a backdoor plan to once again attempt to paint firefighters as the cause of the nation’s economic woes. A similar plan in New Jersy resulted in the state not paying their end of contributions to firefighter retirement plans for years… and then declaring the plan “underfunded and unsustainable”. Here in Washington state, firefighters pay heavily into their retirement. This latest decietful effort by politicians appears to be yet another attempt to sweep around existing rules and undercut the very firefighters and police officers that keep our communities safe.”

I know a retired firefighter who thinks it is OK to get rid of Social Security, Medicare, and pensions for younger generations to balance the budget. He is raising his granddaughter and is not concerned for her future. She will have time to plan and save. He claims there was a lawsuit that saved his pension. He is also a social conservative, so we have had some interesting discussions.

 
 
Comment by polly
2012-04-23 08:27:56

How did everyone else celebrate earthday? I took public transportation (plus a lot of walking in the rain) to my social and cultural activities.

I also bought my nephew a used birthday present on ebay. Love it when someone with a good version of an item I want doesn’t check the comps before listing. Of course, none of the others seem to be selling, so perhaps his price was “better” despite being less than half of any of the other one, even though his looked to be in better shape. Gosh, I almost feel like I got a good deal on house.

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 08:48:00

How did everyone else celebrate earthday?

I celebrated by not waking up outdoors like I did the day before. Went with son to his first Scout campout. It was Wilderness Survival merit badge time, so no tent.

 
Comment by goon squad
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 09:49:37

I’ll celebrate Earth Day when people put wind and solar on their houses instead of buying SUVs.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 10:07:48

I sat at the KXCI booth at Tucson’s Earth Day Festival.

As is typical at these events, someone stopped by and expressed an interest in our deejay training. The station’s community engagement director gave him the run-down:

Come to a volunteer orientation, fill out the volunteer orientation form, and get on the list to be notified of upcoming classes. Then you have to go to the classes, practice a LOT, and if you show some promise, you’ll be invited to shadow the KXCI staff. Over time, shadow time becomes air time.

Now, this guy did have a good radio voice. But the chances of him actually doing the above are small. Matter of fact, of the 17 people who expressed interest in the class I was in, only five of us have made it to the airwaves.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:18:06

I also bought my nephew a used birthday present on ebay.

I’m a bit of a comic book/graphic novel junkie. I usually buy my stuff used on Amazon.

Comment by polly
2012-04-23 10:57:57

The nephew is going to turn three. Not yet into comic books/graphic novels.

Vintage Sit ‘N Spin. The new ones got horrible reviews on Amazon. Seems they are made with plastic bearings, so they don’t spin very quickly and the plastic for the platform is much thinner which leads to cracks. This one has metal bearings and should be much sturdier. Most of the vintage ones are listed between $35 and $60 (higher end of the range might include shipping, might not). A few with really clean stickers are higher. This one looks fine and I got it for $12.50 plus $11 shipping. Plus, it doesn’t need batteries and I kept it out of the landfill.

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 12:23:07

Anyone who has never been around one should be warned about how noisy they are. One of my younger siblings liked to operate it with a full diaper. So you can imagine what we called it when the parent’s weren’t there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 12:57:51

:lol: Damn near forgot all about that name!

 
Comment by polly
2012-04-23 12:59:22

My brother suggested it when I asked him what my nephew would like. I told him it was doable and insisted that he clear it with my sister-in-law before I actually bought anything. I believe that is enough to absolve me of any noise issues. Another reason for going vintage was the lack of any lights or electronically generated sound effects.

 
 
Comment by mikeinbend
2012-04-24 05:45:02

I just about threw up when we had kids, were looking for a sit and spin; and they all included BATTERIES. So it could have beeps and flashes of light! Totally unnecessary to the mechanism of real action (spinning in circles; and fast). but if it don’t irritate the heck out of the adult, it’s not a kid’s toy anymore. We just took the batteries out.

Go vintage and you are gonna get something more durable; and less annoying!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-04-23 11:26:36

I celebrated by not having children.

Comment by Middle Coaster
2012-04-23 11:56:16

What a coincidence, so did I !

Also re-potted my tomato seedlings into Solo cups I had saved from last year’s tomato seedlings.

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-04-23 13:32:22

The Duggar family have more than made up for your shortfall :)

 
 
Comment by The_Overdog
2012-04-23 11:32:45

I planted a peach tree. My first good tree in my yard, as the others are sweetgum (terrible), oak (ok) and crepe mytle (ok).

 
Comment by Doghouse Riley
2012-04-23 14:13:24

“How did everyone else celebrate earthday?”

Well, it was a day early, but I went to watch a couple of guys fire up a World War I Liberty V-12 engine.

Thirty minutes of gas-sucking, carbon spewing horsepower, with a sound like a 400 pound Cuisinart pureeing a set of bone china.

Happy Earth Day everyone!!!

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 22:44:37

Planted another few rows of corn, squash, potatoes, beans, and salad greens. Rode the horses into town to the vet clinic for shots (trailed by the dogs for theirs.) Repaired irrigation lines and repurposed damaged hoses. Then raided the hen house for some eggs for a frittata for dinner.

It was Earth Day?

Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 22:46:25

Oh! And saw the coolest meteor ever. Green and golden– in the DAYTIME!

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 08:40:23

STUDENT DEBT THREAT
Ever-increasing burden of college loans represents a gathering storm for economy, officials say
By Becky Yerak Chicago Tribune
12:01 a.m., April 23, 2012
Updated 3:47 p.m. , April 20, 2012

Move over, mortgages. Get out of the way, Greece. Another economic doomsday scenario is emerging.

Student loan debt has reached about $870 billion — exceeding credit cards and auto loans — and balances are expected to continue climbing, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York said last month.

Borrowers age 60 and above accounted for about 5 percent of that debt — and still owe about $36 billion in student loans. More than 10 percent of those loans are delinquent. The share for Americans age 50 and older is 17 percent. As a result, consumer advocates say, it is not uncommon for Social Security checks to be garnished or for debt collectors to harass borrowers in their 80s over student loans that are decades old.

In February, the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys referred to a “student loan ‘debt bomb’ ” and wondered if it was shaping up to become “America’s next mortgage-style economic crisis.” Such a burden could crimp an already weak economy.

“Student debt poses a large and growing threat to the stability of our economy,” Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan testified March 20 before a U.S. Senate judiciary subcommittee hearing in Washington on the looming student debt crisis.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 08:56:08

And unlike with a mortgage there is nothing to repossess. That’s what really scares them. But it could make real the scenario most young pups fear become reality “not getting a penny from SS”. Not because SS won’t pay out, but because it will be intercepted.

I wonder how many dual nationality kids will simply leave the US and their student loans balances behind? And will their be talk of restricting US Passports to those who are in default or simply have huge SL balances?

Comment by measton
2012-04-23 09:03:27

My sisters in Europe w 40k in school debt, maybe I should tell her to stay there??

My guess is that many will join the underground economy. ie day labor and live in Mom’s basement. Wait until the debts are forgiven. It’s one of those situations where you either want to have no debt or be in debt up to your eyeballs with no chance of paying it back. That’s true of most debt these days.

I went to my friends yesterday and he was fixing up his house to try to get a good home assessment so he could fold his car payments into his home loans at a lower rate. I’ll be interested to see if he can make it fly now, and if he can’t how it affects life going forward. They spend everything and are in debt up to their eyeballs.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:33:20

It’s one of those situations where you either want to have no debt or be in debt up to your eyeballs with no chance of paying it back

It’s one of the reasons I now find the idea of buying a new car with a loan to be so repugnant. In one more year our last car loan should be paid off and I want to keep it that way as long as possible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 09:51:28

“My sisters in Europe w 40k in school debt, maybe I should tell her to stay there??”

I would. Hell, tell her to emigrate if she can!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 12:44:05

“And unlike with a mortgage there is nothing to repossess.”

Doesn’t that depend on whether the borrower has income and/or assets?

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 14:08:21

Agreed, but those who aren’t paying back their loans usually have neither.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 15:27:58

Yet another conundrum, it seems…

 
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2012-04-23 09:04:06

I still don’t see how they think that this is goign to be comparable to the last crisis? In the last one, the government “had” to come in to bail out the banks/bondholders because people couldn’t make payments on their houses (without being able to refi). In student loans, there is a government guarantee on a lot of it (all of it?) so the mechanism for a bailout is already in place. And they are never dischargable in bankruptcy, so there is no equivalent of jingle mail.

Now, the burden of student debt can slow down the future spending of the graduates for years, even decades. But that is because they already spent the money. The idea was that they would have higher earnings, so they would be able to pay back the loans and spend more too. Works until the schools figure out that they can take a lot more of the present value of those future earnings than they used to and suddenly everyone/a lot more people have a degree, so the degree is not necessarily a free ride to higher earnings. When only 10% of the population had one, it was a big advantage. Now it is just the price you pay to get in the door.

This has all the makings of nasty slog. Not a crisis.

Comment by goon squad
2012-04-23 09:44:19

“nasty slog?”

For the Lucky Duckies repaying student loans, yes it will be a lifetime of stagflationary living conditions. As the squad has correctly predicted, within twenty years there will only remain the 1%, and less than 15% below them will have what could be considered a middle class standard of living, and the vast majority of this country will be working poor. This preciction is 100% correct, you’ll see :)

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 09:56:55

For those of us without student loans, it’s already been “a lifetime of stagflationary living conditions.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:07:43

As the squad has correctly predicted, within twenty years there will only remain the 1%, and less than 15% below them will have what could be considered a middle class standard of living, and the vast majority of this country will be working poor.

The demographics of a 3rd world nation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 10:57:29

Just what the world needs: another 3rd world nation with 5000 atomic bombs.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 08:43:35

ECONOMY
April 22, 2012, 8:36 p.m. ET

Urban Center Is Budget Hole
Kansas City, Mo., Must Set Aside Millions as Complex Falls Short of Projections
By ELIOT BROWN
[KANSAS3] Steve Hebert for The Wall Street Journal

Kansas City’s Power & Light District has lured tenants but has produced lower-than-expected sales and property taxes.

KANSAS CITY, Mo.—The tab is mounting for this Midwestern city on a bet it made during the real-estate boom on an $850 million entertainment district meant to breathe new life into its struggling downtown.

While the eight-block restaurant, nightclub and retail complex named the Power & Light District is mostly complete, traffic and sales are well below initial projections when construction started in 2006.

Such woes are common among real-estate developers who imagined values and rents in a fast-growing U.S. economy would continue to rise for years.

But the Power & Light District stands out because it was financed through a technique that seemed like it would pay for itself. Kansas City directed future sales and property taxes in the district to pay back the $295 million in bonds that the city issued for the project, which went toward infrastructure and to directly support the development. In the event there weren’t enough taxes, the city agreed to pick up the difference.

Today, the project, which sits near the onetime headquarters of Kansas City Power & Light Co., generates less than one-third of what is needed to cover the debt service on the bonds. The city is setting aside $12.8 million in its budget for the fiscal year that starts next month to cover the gap, a notable hole in a $1.3 billion budget that calls for $7.6 million in cuts to the fire department.

Given the sluggish real-estate recovery, the city expects similar gaps to persist for years. “Our street maintenance has had to come down; our budget for neighborhood and community services has had to come down,” says Scott Wagner, a first-term member of the city council. “You have a very large expense associated with a certain project, and that can’t help but stand out.”

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 09:58:19

Remind me again what kind of stability and tangible benefits “entertainment” produce?

Comment by 2banana
2012-04-23 10:56:19

Remind me again why a city is investing in a eight-block restaurant, nightclub and retail complex based on the speculation of appreciation?

And that if it fails it will wipe out the city?

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 13:06:43

You don’t realize it but you just agreed with me.

I think that large scale entertainment should NEVER get subsidies as they produce NOTHING tangible in the way of civic improvements and only benefits the least amount of people after construction and local government sure as hell should NOT be helping to the tune of millions.

Now I’m all about the arts. Love it! But I’ve seen the art/entertainment game inside and out and like most of “entertainment” it’s dirty and inbred. The entertainment industry is the last group on this planet that should EVER claim to be a “business”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 22:53:58

LOL, turkey. Biggest scam on the planet– people pay YOU to put them to work.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 19:42:29

“…tangible benefits “entertainment” produce…”

Ask your friendly neighborhood Secret Service agent.

 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 08:53:01

“Stretching the central bank’s credibility” - what exactly does that mean?

Draghi’s ECB Rejects Geithner-IMF Push for Measures
By Jeff Black, Rainer Buergin and Meera Louis - Apr 23, 2012 5:47 AM ET
Bloomberg

European Central Bank officials led by President Mario Draghi resisted calls from the International Monetary Fund and U.S. Treasury to do more to stem the debt crisis roiling the euro-area economy.

Further measures to quell financial turmoil in Spain risk stretching the credibility of the bank’s monetary policy, Luc Coene, ECB Governing Council member and governor of Belgium’s central bank, said in an interview on April 21.

“We have done what we can do so far within our mandate and within the possibilities we have,” he said in Washington. “The only thing we could do is overstretch ourselves and then we would even lose the credibility we have at that moment.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-22/draghi-s-ecb-rejects-geithner-imf-push-for-measures.html

Comment by measton
2012-04-23 09:05:33

Stretching the central bank’s credibility” - what exactly does that mean?

Investors belief that the FED can fix everything by printing more money. If people feel they can’t, which I believe they can’t w/o gov help, people will go to cash and wait for the collapse.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 10:03:28

I’ve been cash-n-carry for over 12 years. I did take out one loan for a new vehicle over that same time because the old had over 200K and wasn’t worth repairing anymore.

My job instability from 6 recessions will NEVER allow me to buy a house and I work white collar!

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:20:01

My job instability from 6 recessions will NEVER allow me to buy a house and I work white collar!

It’s reached the point where you expect to eventually be laid off.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 10:29:32

It’s reached the point where you expect to eventually be laid off.

Welcome to 1995.

You’re going to implode if you operate any other way.

 
Comment by measton
2012-04-23 10:30:15

Which goes to Henry Fords idea that supporting a middle class creates economic growth and crushing destroys it. People with unsteady jobs(ie more and more of America) are less likely to buy houses, invest in house or community, spend like the paycheck will always be there).

Admittedly in a global free market which allows states that use slave labor to compete nothign works, it’s a race to the bottom. Which country can suffer more pain. Countries don’t want outflows of money and the way to control that is to crush the middle class. They want manufacturing and the way to get that is to crush the middle class and drive down wages and benefits. This is what’s going on across the globe with no one thinking about how this is going to affect demand. I saw a talk by Charlie Rose with a bunch of central bankers the other day. Only one, the guy from India, mentioned jobs and bolstering the middle class. You should have heard the bloated banker from Mexico, all about concentrating the wealth.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 11:01:38

1995? Try 1975 when steel mills, shipbuilders, car makers and electronics mfgrs were getting their butts handed to them by foreign companies who were using modern technology.

It’s been downhill ever since.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 15:44:43

“You should have heard the bloated banker from Mexico, all about concentrating the wealth”

That would be Agustin Carstens

 
Comment by SV guy
2012-04-23 16:06:10

Henry Ford also had a strong opinion regarding ‘the money changers’.

Hmmmmmmmm.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2012-04-23 08:59:02

KANSAS CITY, Mo.—The tab is mounting for this Midwestern city on a bet it made during the real-estate boom on an $850 million entertainment district meant to breathe new life into its struggling downtown.

All these investments depend on people with piles of cash from equity extraction. Those people are gone.

Comment by butters
2012-04-23 09:14:34

“If you build it, they will come” doesn’t seem to work in the long run.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 09:35:53

The local “alternative” newspaper, “The Pitch” has been all over this.

A story that is not uncommon.

-Developer proposes a “partnership” with government. (Meaning……the developer makes bank if it succeeds; if it doesn’t, then the government is the bagholder. We know it as corporate socialism)

-Developer and/or government hires “consultants”, who go out and assume the best case scenarios will all happen; minimizing/underestimating costs, and assuming the absolute best case on the revenue projections.

The main one being that people will fight the traffic to drive 25-30 miles into downtown from the Kansas burbs, pay 10.725% sales taxes, plus parking, plus marked up prices, plus dealing with the KCMO PD/Waffen SS, and all of the other PDs watching for DUI candidates, just to be in on the newest trendiest hot spots.

Anyone who calls any of the soothsayers projections into question is accused of being anti-progress, a cheapskate, not interested in growth, etc.

Of course, the revenue projections ALWAYS miss. (In this case, 2008 projection for tax revenue generated = 14.1 million. Actual = 2.2 million).

The developer’s response? “From our perspective, we’d like to focus on the present”. Of course you would.

In the meantime, the city is on the hook for $15-20 million/year, for the next 20 years, if they are lucky.

Comment by measton
2012-04-23 10:23:33

Chump change compared to football stadiums

I’ll just take issue with this

Developer proposes a “partnership” with government. (Meaning……the developer makes bank if it succeeds; if it doesn’t, then the government is the bagholder. We know it as corporate socialism)

It has nothing to do with socialism, you can call it corporatism or facism (elite run the government and completely ie TARP and FED) but not socialism.

 
Comment by b-hamster
2012-04-23 10:25:24

This is no different than anything else that is “privatised.” Take the prison industry, for example. A private firm comes in to operate the prisons. They are guarenteed a certain prison population, and consequently, a predictable revenue stream and level of profitability. If enough priisoners don’t populate the facility, the government kicks in, basically ensuring profitability with no (or little) risk to the company operating the prison. The whole notion of privatisation is a joke, especially when you socialy risk and privatise reward. Tax dollars going to fund a private company is not privatisation.

An aside, I was listening to the CBC this morning and a recent study (god knows who funded it) concluded that Vancouver’s public schools perform as well, if not better, than private schools in science and physics.

Comment by measton
2012-04-23 10:35:01

Tax dollars going to fund a private company is not privatisation.

I’d add it’s not a free market
It’s not capitalism
It doesn’t save money in the long run.
It doesn’t improve services or reliability.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2012-04-23 12:29:09

Hmmmm…the mayor’s name is “Sly” isn’t it?

 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 10:07:00

As I posted earlier, remind me again what stability, improved living standard and tangible benefits “entertainment” provides?

Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 22:59:10

SAG cards?

 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 09:02:32

Europe’s Debt Crisis Getting Worse, Pimco’s El-Erian Says
By Susanne Walker and Kathleen Hays - Apr 11, 2012 3:21 PM ET
Bloomberg

Europe’s fiscal crisis is getting worse and will keeping fueling market instability, according to Pacific Investment Management Co.’sMohamed A. El-Erian.

“People are realizing that the tranquility that we have is bought rather than earned,” El-Erian said. “It depends on the ECB putting in liquidity in order to calm markets. At the first indication that the ECB may not be committed to this, people get really nervous.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-11/europe-s-debt-crisis-getting-worse-pimco-s-el-erian-says.html

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 09:03:01

Want to know why I spend the majority of my time blasting Republicans? Because they do/say most of the stupidest things.

Note to Kansas Republican leadership: You don’t offer buyouts to people who have jobs that are in demand, and/or whose replacements will be even more expensive.

“Kansas State hospitals face staffing crisis”

http://tinyurl.com/7fj577u

A former co-worker got his nursing degree in 2009. He worked for the state at the local juvenile detention center for about a year, then left (and doubled his pay) at a local hospital.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 09:40:07

Nurses make good coin. A friend in Houston tells me that his wife (a neo natal ICU nurse) makes about 120K a year, with some overtime.

Comment by Realtors Are Stunningly Unethical®
2012-04-23 09:47:03

And they work every hour on the clock and every day on the calendar. Basically, their job is first and everything else second. No thanks.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:06:05

I agree, its a tough job.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-04-23 09:51:45

“blasting Republicans?”

The only reason anyone ever blasts them is because of the class-warfare, politics of envy, that is the communist playbook from Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals”. Ask Allen West, he has correctly identified that over 80 members of the House Progressive Caucus are in fact Marxist communists. It’s all true, there was a Breitbart story linked from the Drudge Report!

 
 
 
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 09:26:22

I mentioned about 2 weeks ago that I resolved to find a new firm to work for since my firm decided not to shutter its real estate department/title company. After a year of cutbacks and layoffs, combined with a salary freeze/reduction for the younger workers, I decided it was the last straw. RE isn’t going to make a comeback anytime soon and, even if it does, it won’t be in exurban areas such as where my firm is located (Bel Air, MD).

I found a new job that’s as good as I could expect in a lot of ways. They’re very busy and very profitable–no real estate sink hole where all the profits from other practice areas get flushed.

Only downside? I still have to commute to the suburbs, about 30 min each way. :( It’s in Columbia, MD and public transit would take 3.5 hrs according to Google, whereas a car takes 29 min. And biking isn’t an option because I’d have to go through downtown at rush hour because you obviously can’t take a bike through the Harbor Tunnel. I can’t complain too much about this–this job pays better and has better long term prospects, not to mention not having to hear about “real estate is going to make a comeback” as an excuse for why I need to take a salary cut to help them stay in business. Just more motivation to keep working on moving to one of the larger firms in the city or to start my own practice in the city (I don’t have enough experience yet to learn some practice areas AND worry about generating business).

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 10:12:09

Just more motivation to keep working on moving to one of the larger firms in the city or to start my own practice in the city (I don’t have enough experience yet to learn some practice areas AND worry about generating business).

Joe, if you’re interested in the generating biz part, one of my clients is an expert in marketing for lawyers. Want her contact info? Just ask!

Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 11:29:42

I would do this but I’m not quite ready to go it on my own. Well, I could, but I want to do quality work and add value, as opposed to being a commodity and relying on a high volume of cases. You are exposed to a lot of people and ideas when you work for a firm–not saying I want to do it forever, of course.

And yes, lawyers should spend more time developing a marketing and online presence. Hard to believe how many lawyers have a) no web presence b) a very limited web presence or c) a web presence that makes them look amateurish/lazy/second rate.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 11:39:14

And yes, lawyers should spend more time developing a marketing and online presence. Hard to believe how many lawyers have a) no web presence b) a very limited web presence or c) a web presence that makes them look amateurish/lazy/second rate.

Preach it!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 12:07:46

Most lawyers, like most people, are bad with money. Take a solo practice guy who brings in 100k. Instead of investing 10% of that into things that will grow the business (and return much more than 10k over time), most will spend it on other things. I have been astounded at the disconnect between lawyers and good business practices. Most of them view support staff and technology as expenses, rather than as ways to add value, leverage their time, and scale their practice. You would be amazed at how many law offices have only a few scanners, have minimal hard drive storage capacity, have outdated computers, and still use mostly paper documents (takes up a LOT of space and is hard to search).

This is to say nothing of how many firms would rather hire the lowest-cost employees (despite complacency or unrealiability) rather than someone who will add to their bottom line over time.

 
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 12:13:41

Slim,

I look forward to needing your friend’s contact info in the future. I might need a website as well. However, I’m pretty certain I need at least a yr or two of additional “seasoning” before I will be ready to really add value for clients.

 
 
 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 10:20:54

When I take salary cuts, it’s only to give me time to look for another job.

No matter what happens, the company has shown me it can’t manage its money and has no foresight.

Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 11:17:34

This was my thinking as well. However, when this first happened, I had only been at the job a few months and wanted a good reference + I actually learned quite a bit from the lawyers I worked with. The firm also came up with a plan to phase out the RE/title side of things, which gave some reason for confidence. However, as I said a few weeks ago, Spring came early to the NE and there has been a bump in RE transactions compared to what is usual for Feb/March/April. As in, the number of transactions is far ahead of this time last yr (or the yr before). I believe this won’t last and that the firm will continue to lose money overall with the RE dealings–they lost close to 100k on the RE department last yr. So the fact they didn’t carry through and close the obvious, gaping hole in their balance sheet was my sign to walk.

Many/most law firms up here in exurbia have a title company attached to or owned by the firm. This is a remnant of the 2000-2008 era when firms made a lot more money doing title work and settlements than practicing law. And firms know that if they shut down their title/settlement work, they’ll never get the business back because the RE agents and Mort brokers will form other relationships. So what you have is dozens of firms fighting it out for a shrinking pool of home purchases, with all the firms thinking “if we can only hang on, we’ll make all our money back in the next boom”. Stupid, if you ask me.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 10:26:53

You should specialize in BK Law. I have a feeling there is going to be long term demand for that. The trick I suppose is getting your customers to pay upfront.

“It’s in Columbia, MD and public transit would take 3.5 hrs according to Google, whereas a car takes 29 min. ”

Which is why no one rides the bus except in very dense population centers. I have no idea of how long public transit would take from where I live to where I work in Broomfield. Probably 2-3 hours as well.

Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 10:52:41

I just find this a little weird, because I live in Baltimore and Columbia MD is about 1/2 way between DC and Baltimore. It’s actually a fairly dense area.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 11:50:14

By “densely populated” I meant that one lives on the 10th floor of an apartment building, not in a cul de sac.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 12:11:42

Columbia is actually a pretty dense, planned community. It was started by James Rouse to be the first mixed-use development in the U.S. You can look it up on wikipedia, it’s pretty interesting. It’s mostly 3-4 story apartments/condos and townhouses. The type of places that oxide described not being interested in.

I do see your point, though. And as energy costs rise, I think there will be less and less demand for exurban housing, so perhaps jobs will migrate back towards the inner cities as well? The US seems to subsidize big oil, energy, and transportation, though…. to say nothing of the lobby by the NAR and home builders.

 
Comment by polly
2012-04-23 13:08:02

Joe, you are not in the exurbs. Not even close. Referring to Columbia, MD as the exurbs and then describing it as half way between B’more and DC is just silly.

 
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 15:02:25

I didn’t refer to where I work as an exurb. Columbia, as I noted, is fairly dense. Mostly attached housing (LOTS of “luxury” townhomes) interspersed by some single family housing. Things really start to spread out after Columbia.

That said, even though Columbia is fairly dense, it’s public transit availability is minimal and poor. I really don’t understand why it would take 3 hrs by public transit when it takes me 29 min to drive. I think the answer is the county line (Columbia is in Howard County, not Baltimore or Anne Arundel) and the priorities of that county government, which is far more conservative than Balt or AA counties, to say nothing of Balt City.

It’s the same with my current job in Bel AIr, MD. Takes me 35 min to drive. To take public transit, it really wouldn’t be possible at all. The routes line up only 2 or 3 times a day at absurd hours. And even then it would take 3 hrs.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 10:40:32

Staying ahead of the curve is probably The Onion’s biggest challenge.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 11:36:14

Idiocracy rising.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 10:37:33

Don’t buy on the dip, buy on the crater.

Comment by FedReserve Gov's Are Corrupt®
2012-04-23 10:59:24

Prices are falling. Why buy now? Buy later after prices crater.

 
 
Comment by rms
2012-04-23 11:17:22

HBB Fundraising Week

One Benjamin on the way!

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 11:42:47

Just sent some monetary love of my own. I heart the HBB!

 
Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 11:47:47

Make it rain!

 
 
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 11:55:24

Just wanted to say that during my job search the past 2 weeks, I came up against quite a few air-headed “chicky poos” who inexplicably seem to be in charge of setting up interviews at many places. If you’re hiring someone who will be part of the revenue-generating business you’re trying to sell, why would you put some minimally-skilled, uneducated person in charge of the hiring process?

I understand that the lawyers (partners) get to make the final call, but if you delegate the “narrowing down” process to someone who just cut and pastes questions via email, it gives a very bad first impression. I didn’t take any of these firms seriously.

Another thing I noticed that seemed not to make sense was I ran into a couple law firms that have absolutely atrocious insurance. As in, high deductible plans or plans where only the employee is covered.

I’m going to use my wife’s excellent insurance (she’s a teacher) so it didn’t matter to me directly. However, this also gave me a very bad impression of those firms as low-end sweatshop mentality places. One of them actually does a lot of foreclosure work for Bank of America. They must have a fairly low profit margin, because they’re clearly only concerned with getting someone who will do the work at a minimally proficient level (or worse), rather than actually growing the firm.

OK, so those were just some observations I had… clearly the mantra that “first impressions matter” goes both ways and some firms/companies either don’t realize it or don’t care. And I can’t imagine the kind of people who would be satisfied working at these places. The turnover must be tremendous.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 12:10:29

Another thing I noticed that seemed not to make sense was I ran into a couple law firms that have absolutely atrocious insurance. As in, high deductible plans or plans where only the employee is covered.

Welcome to the land of insurance for the self-employed. Oh, wait. You’re applying for a job.

Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 12:39:30

Slim, I wasn’t saying that the system is right… but rather making a broader comment that a) our current health care system that links healthcare to a job is absurd… but b) it makes a very bad impression when you get to the part of the interview where health coverage is discussed and you tell the prospective employee that the firm’s group insurance is little better than what Walmart or McDonald’s offer. One of the only good things about working for someone else’s business instead of being self-employed is that the pooling of risk should allow for better insurance rates and, therefore, decent insurance.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-04-23 12:55:29

One of the only good things about working for someone else’s business instead of being self-employed is that the pooling of risk should allow for better insurance rates and, therefore, decent insurance.

One of the few good reasons to work for a big company: they usually offer better insurance. Every small company I’ve worked at offered crummy insurance, I would say that HD plans are now the norm in small companies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 13:19:58

Today’s deductibles used to be the WHOLE cost of the procedure!

Talk about creating a “welfare” culture! Corporate welfare!

 
 
 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-04-23 13:11:24

“I came up against quite a few air-headed “chicky poos” who inexplicably seem to be in charge of setting up interviews at many places.”

This has been my experience in the last few years.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 13:46:41

Gotta put all those kids with semi-worthless BA degrees somewhere.

Comment by Awaiting
2012-04-23 14:09:26

Is HR a low-demand degree?
(A sprinkle of state laws no doubt, but the rest seems foo-foo)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 14:13:52

Is there actually a degree in HR? I’d never heard of anybody getting a degree in that. I thought it was made up of people with other degrees who somehow ended up there.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 14:16:51

I thought it was made up of people with other degrees who somehow ended up there.

I haven’t heard of an HR major at the university level. But I do know that community colleges offer certificates in the field.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-04-23 14:18:43

HR -
OK, I looked it up. Math, Accounting (who would have thunk), Psychology, and lots of Humanities, and even Microeconomics.
Considering my negative interactions, I am surprised. The ones I meet in the REIT world are worthless.

I use to hire by personality and some knowledge. Prior,I use to hire by resume alone, and they never lasted. You’re a work family.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-04-23 18:28:43

It’s a Business Administration with an emphasis in HR at some universities, and it is also offered at the grad school level. My former company had masters in HR idiots.

 
 
Comment by joesmith
2012-04-23 15:10:55

In one case, I emailed back and forth with an HR chickypoo, about 4 exchanges in each direction. She was clearly just cutting and pasting from a script. I could tell because the line breaks were in weird places and the questions had clauses like “if applicable…” and contained a bunch of legalese (e.g. “and/or”). I’m not sure exactly who they were looking for, but it really doesn’t matter–I would likely not have been able to take them seriously if that is their hiring process.

The idea is to build a career and some skills, not to be a commodity shuffling from one employer to the next. Especially in the law, you get cr@pped on until you’re bringing in business and handling major cases on your own. In many cases, the partners literally view the associates as monkeys.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-04-23 16:14:54

The idea is to build a career and some skills, not to be a commodity shuffling from one employer to the next.

That used to be the idea for everybody. Now it’s only for the top monkeys.

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 23:09:17

Shaquille O’neill is getting a PhD in HRD. ‘Nuff said.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-04-23 14:02:52

Those psychological questions in the HR (Human Remains) screening process are just dumb. I wish I could speak to my future direct report.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 14:36:28

I’ve NEVER gotten an interview, much less a job wading thru the HR gauntlet.

The whole reason for the HR hiring process is to find reasons NOT to hire a specific person, to cull the number of people to actually get an interview to a manageable level.

My advice……forget the online process. When you hear about a job opening, find out if you know someone that works there, and see if you can arrange an intro to who the new hire will report to. Or whoever HIS boss is. And go pay a visit. Or call, but it’s easier to give an outright NO to someone over the phone, than it is to someone standing in front of you.

And I can’t stress enough how important it is to DRESS appropriately.

-One of my daughter’s boyfriends applied for a job with a couple of hundred applicants for 6-8 open positions. He wore a dress shirt, and I loaned him a tie. He was the ONLY kid to show up wearing a tie. He was hired.

-A former co-worker didn’t have the money for a suit when he got out of college, so I gave him one of mine. Wore it to the interview, when he applied for an good paying RN position. Has been there a year now. Talked with him a week or so ago. Said he was chatting with his boss, and she told him the only reason he was hired over other candidates, is that he wore a nice suit to the interview.

Comment by Awaiting
2012-04-23 18:46:06

X-GSfixr
Thank you for the constructive advice. Yeah, I decided looking for work in your pj’s and sending in 100’s of e-resumes and letters of she’s wonderful from the VP’s was a zero end game.
Now I get all gussied up in my Sunday best, and meet and greet, knock on doors, and soft sell myself.

In my field, jobs are few, the stress is high, and the competition is fierce. As my former firm changed, I left for self preservation. I did the right thing, but boy has it cost me. I could have picked a relocation (they loved me) but I didn’t like the direction of the firm. Nuff said.

 
 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-04-23 14:07:32

A bunch of stats and another rant on “Zero Hedge” about fat, lazy Americans. I’d just like to point a couple of things out….

-The writer discusses all of the people applying for disability benefits after their unemployment runs out…….this is proof that they are fat and lazy.

Maybe it’s a sign of something else……….like, maybe, there are NO JOBS. Especially, if you are:

-Over 45 (too much training/experience, won’t work for slave wages and will bail if and when a better job comes along), or

-Under 30 (not enough experience, costs too much to train).

Also says that Americans are out of work because they are stupid, and aren’t capable of getting advanced science or technical degrees. Says if you are a “specialist” you don’t have a problem finding work.

It’s actually the opposite. Employers are looking for “specialized” people that don’t exist. Either because they don’t want to pay for any training, or the want to use the “We can’t find qualified American…..s” spiel to justify hiring an H-1B. Or a combination of both.

I don’t know where he’s from, but around here the jobs that require advanced science and technical degrees are even scarcer that run of the mill McJobs. And pay less than they did five years ago…….25-40% less.

Globalization. Great if you are worried about the standard of living in China and Mexico, or if you are a business looking to increase profits by cutting costs. Not so great for anyone else.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 14:28:10

“When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.”

The Northern European advocacy of fiscal restraint, lower debt and austerity versus liquidity injections and central bank purchases of government bonds. I think the Europeans have two bad choices. They have to choose the lesser of two evils.

Europe’s Austerity Backlash Gathers Steam in Merkel Test
By James G. Neuger - Apr 23, 2012 11:44 AM ET
Bloomberg

Europe’s backlash against austerity gained momentum, in a challenge to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s budget-cutting prescriptions for resolving the debt crisis.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy lost the first round of his re-election bid and a revolt against extra spending cuts in the traditionally budget-conscious Netherlands propelled Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s coalition toward an early breakup.

Hollande pressed the advantage today, telling a rally in Quimper on the Brittany coast that a Socialist victory would “be the end of imposing austerity everywhere, austerity that brought desperation to people throughout Europe.”

This kind of message is what people want to hear. But does it make any sense?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-23/europe-s-austerity-backlash-gains-steam-in-challenge-to-merkel.html

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 16:46:17

“Prices for bottom-tier properties have improved since 2011, reports Zillow, while top-tier prices keep falling.”

So long as top-tier prices are falling, isn’t this also a good time to rent?

Mortgage payments at lowest level in decades
By Beth Braverman @Money April 23, 2012: 11:24 AM ET

(Money Magazine) — For today’s homebuyers, the weight of the monthly mortgage bill is the lightest it’s been in decades.

Put 20% down on a median-priced ($154,400) existing home, and your payment will come to $616 a month, only 12.1% of the median U.S. family income.

In 98 of the top 100 metro areas, it’s now cheaper to buy than rent.

“If you have good credit,” says IHS Global Insight economist Patrick Newport, “this is the best time in 40 years to buy.”

Want to trade up? You may think the buyer of your current home is getting a deal, but you might get an even better one on your next place.

Real estate’s best-kept secret

Prices for bottom-tier properties have improved since 2011, reports Zillow, while top-tier prices keep falling.

Want to invest? To get the best rate (a quarter to a half point higher than for your primary residence), you’ll have to put at least 25% down, according to federal guidelines.

Comment by Realtors Are Parasites®
2012-04-23 17:44:39

Realtors Are Parasites®

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2012-04-23 17:12:56

For all of the cat lovers here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M7ibPk37_U

Comment by ahansen
2012-04-23 23:21:40

Oh, Muggy.

That one is going into my hall of fame. Absolutely perfect!

Je suis perdu…. Nous sommes touts Henri.

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 17:30:21

Very interesting. An orange piece of paper was pasted on the door to another apartment. A notice of a court date and the reason - failure to pay rent. These apartments are on one-year leases. There’s all kinds of scary language in the lease about what happens to people who don’t pay off the entire year.

Anyway - this person has got to go to court. If they don’t show up, they’ll get a contempt of court or some such and get jailed.

I thought wow - what about people with mortgages who just decide to walk? No harm, no foul? Just walk away? No court dates? No contempt of court? No risk of jail time?

We hear all the sob stories about homeowners. A renter? Don’t pay, and not only will your stuff wind up in the street in a few weeks time, but you’ll have to show up for court. No “just walk away” there. But precious few sob stories.

Related story:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505144_162-57417654/jailed-for-280-the-return-of-debtors-prisons/

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-04-23 19:19:29

Here in Tucson, the Writ of Restitution is taped to the front door or window where curious neighbors and other passersby can see it. In essence, this piece of paper gives you a very limited time to claim your stuff before the landlord can claim it as his or her own.

Happened next door. Very nice guy just up and vanished last summer. We neighbors are still scratching our heads over that one. We really liked him.

Any-hoo, his car and van ended up being the property of his landlord. Who sold both.

Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 20:41:31

This is an actual summons. It says “Summons” in bold black letters towards the bottom of the document. I just took a picture of it to make sure I had the details correct. It lists a court location, date of trial and time. If they don’t show, that will cause a whole host of follow-on issues.

Wow. Walking away from a rental contract seems to be a lot more onerous than walking away from a mortgage. I’d like to see some ability to strategically default on rent.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 17:50:34

Global shares fall on European political uncertainty
By Chikako Mogi
TOKYO | Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:28pm EDT

(Reuters) - Asian shares fell on Tuesday as political uncertainty and disappointing data in Europe raised fears the euro zone could struggle to push through austerity measures and may stay in recession until late in the year.

After a Sunday vote in France placed the presidential race wide open, Dutch Price Minister Mark Rutte on Monday tendered his government’s resignation in a crisis over budget cuts, creating a political vacuum in one of the euro zone’s most stable nations.

U.S. stocks fell over 1 percent and European equities plunged to a three-month low on Monday, hurt by data showing the euro zone’s business slump deepened at a far faster pace than expected in April.

MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan .MIAPJ0000PUS inched down 0.2 percent while Japan’s Nikkei average .N225 opened down 0.8 percent.

Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 19:55:53

It looks to my jaundiced eye as though the IMF is propping up the Global DOW to a level of 1900.

April 23, 2012, 4:34 a.m. EDT
Asia markets drop on China data, French elections
By Virginia Harrison and V. Phani Kumar, MarketWatch

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — Asia markets fell Monday after data showed Chinese manufacturing activity continued to contract in April, albeit at a smaller pace, with investors also wary before the outcome of French presidential elections and upcoming global economic events.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 19:52:03

China is going hog wild building malls, just in time for a recession. This is definitely going to end badly.

April 23, 2012, 10:36 p.m. EDT
China tops world in shopping mall construction
By Chris Oliver, MarketWatch

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — China dominates the world in terms of shopping-mall construction, with some cities little-known in the West throwing up retail centers on a scope unmatched anywhere else in the world, as developers place high expectations on the spending power of the Chinese consumer.

In terms of shopping-center space under construction, China holds the top three spots worldwide, and accounts for 8 of the cities that make up the top 10, according to CBRE, which released the data as part of its global retail survey earlier last week.

The world’s busiest mall-construction hub, Tianjin, a major northeastern Chinese port city near the capital Beijing, has more shopping-center space under construction than the entire existing mall-space inventory of any single European city, apart from Paris and Moscow, according to CBRE.

About 16 projects are in various stages of completion, entailing 2.45 million square meters (26.4 million square feet), according to the CBRE data.

Shenyang, an industrial city about an hour’s train ride from North Korea, ranks No.2 globally in terms of retail construction. The provincial capital, which also serves as a commercial hub for trade with Russia, Japan and the Koreas, is building 2.18 million square meters of retail space in 18 shopping development projects.

Also bustling with retail construction, and ranking third globally, is Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan province in China’s southwest. The city, home to 14 million residents, is located near the region devastated by a major earthquake in 2008, and it has about 24 retail development projects underway, equivalent to around 1.89 million square meters, according to CBRE.

Wuhan a provincial capital of more than 10 million in China’s central interior, ranked fifth, or just slightly behind Abu Dhabi. Nearly one million square meters of retail developments are underway in the city, according to the data.

Sebastian Skiff, executive director at CBRE Asia in Beijing, said at first glance, the nationwide numbers appear to be a “scary” symptom of the overbuilding that has been a part of China’s rapid growth.

Comment by Neuromance
2012-04-23 20:50:35

Ahhh, speculation. Is there anything it can’t do?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-04-23 19:59:09

April 22, 2012, 9:52 p.m. EDT
New jail threat for Hong Kong bankers
Commentary: Are they scapegoats for mainland China equity fraud?
By Craig Stephen

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — It is doubtful many would shed tears if a few unpopular bankers were to end up in jail. This fate now looms as a new career risk for Hong Kong bankers if proposals to make listing sponsors legally liable for the accuracy of prospectuses goes through.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 23:40:43

The Reaping is coming to Wall Street.

If history is any guide, the fallout will land on Main Street.

BUSINESS
Updated April 23, 2012, 3:58 p.m. ET

Music Stops for Wall Street Bankers
By ANUPREETA DAS And GINA CHON

Several major U.S. banks are planning to trim investment-banking units that were built for an era of deals aplenty. Anupreeta Das has details on The News Hub. Photo: Bloomberg.

Wall Street’s latest problem: too many bankers and not enough deals.

Amid new regulation, lower profits and a dreary market for mergers and acquisitions, several banks are planning to trim investment-banking units that were built for an era of deals aplenty.

Having already slashed bonuses, banks including Citigroup Inc., (C -1.89%) Goldman Sachs Group Inc., (GS -0.61%) J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM +0.30%) & Co. and Morgan Stanley (MS -2.86%) are preparing to cut dozens of jobs, including some held by senior bankers, according to people familiar with the matter. As they pursue this targeted round of trims as soon as next month, they and rivals are also revisiting profit expectations for their advisory businesses, people familiar with the matter said.

Until recently, Wall Street’s ax had largely fallen on trading desks, which shed thousands of jobs as business dried up due to regulations and lackluster markets.

But the cost-cutting focus is now expanding to deal makers and corporate advisers that have remained among Wall Street’s most high-profile professionals even as their contributions to banks’ bottom line has been dwarfed by traders. In addition to mergers-and-acquisitions advisory, investment banking includes raising capital through stock and debt.

“The whole paradigm of banking is changing so there is a lot of right sizing and that will continue throughout this year,” said Michael Karp, managing partner at Options Group, a financial-services industry executive search firm. All of the top firms “have overcapacity,” he added.

As is often the case in Wall Street’s Darwinian culture, the culling is expected to affect the old and the weak. The job losses will target underperforming bankers and those nearing retirement age, according to people familiar with the situation.

The goal is to remove people who aren’t “pulling their weight,” said one investment-banking head at a major bank, adding that “banks are overbuilt” in relation to the work available. As compared with years past, banks are less willing to keep those employees on board in hopes of a near-term recovery.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 23:44:42

WSJ dot com
COMMODITIES
Updated April 23, 2012, 3:26 p.m. ET

Gold Falls, Silver Sinks
By MATT DAY

NEW YORK—Disappointing global economic data and anxiety about Europe’s debt crisis drew investors to the safety of the U.S. dollar Monday, denting demand for gold and pushing the precious metal to its lowest price in more than two weeks.

The most actively traded contract, for June delivery, fell $10.20, or 0.6%, to settle at $1,632.60 a troy ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. That is the lowest settlement price since April 5.

Gold fell sharply early in European trading hours, as heavy selling jolted the market awake amid thin liquidity. The collapse of austerity talks in the Netherlands, the challenger’s lead in the first round of France’s presidential elections, and data showing contraction in the euro zone’s manufacturing and service economies all gave gold traders pause Monday.

“Europe sneezed and we are catching cold,” said George Gero, a vice president and precious metals strategist with RBC Capital Markets.

Some investors turn to gold as a safe harbor from turmoil in other markets, but that dynamic hasn’t held when worries about Europe’s debt crisis were front and center.

Silver, which sees more use by industry than as an investment, settled down 3.5% at $30.531 a troy ounce for the most-active May contract, the lowest price since Jan. 17.

Industrial metals saw sharper declines than gold Monday on weaker demand expectations after the release of European economic data and news of a continued manufacturing slowdown in key raw materials consumer China. HSBC’s gauge of China’s nationwide manufacturing activity remained in contraction for a sixth consecutive month in April, according to preliminary estimates.

A potential freeze in Europe’s financial system has spurred traders to favor the flexibility of cash instead of precious-metals futures. And rising concerns about Europe tend to prop up investment in U.S. dollar-denominated debt, driving the currency higher and weighing on dollar-denominated gold by making the futures appear more expensive for buyers using other currencies.

Also weighing on gold Monday was diminished expectations that the Federal Reserve would soon announce fresh steps to support U.S. economic growth, said Bart Melek, head of commodity strategy with TD Securities.

“People are saying, ‘I don’t think we’re going to see anything definitive’” from the Federal Reserve, he said. Gold tends to benefit from such accommodative monetary policies, as investors seek a hedge against weakness in paper currencies. But with the U.S. economy still expanding at a faster clip than many had expected entering the year, and some Federal Reserve officials vocally reluctant to take further action, the central bank isn’t widely expected to give the gold market new fuel with its policy statement Wednesday afternoon.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 23:48:11

REVIEW & OUTLOOK EUROPE
April 22, 2012, 3:37 p.m. ET

The Dutch Collapse

Willem Buiter, Citigroup’s chief economist, told the House of Lords last October that Germany was “the only honest triple-A rated sovereign in the G-7.” The rest enjoyed their credit grades “but for the grace of God and the ratings agencies.” He was referring to France, but the admonition holds equally for the euro zone’s three remaining triple-A borrowers that aren’t Germany: Finland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. With the collapse of the Dutch government’s budget talks on Saturday and the likely announcement of early elections, the ratings agencies may soon have reason to stop being so obliging.

The Netherlands’ problem isn’t its public debt, which was 66% of GDP last year. The budget deficit in 2013 is expected to be around 4.6% of annual output—higher than the European Commission’s 3% ceiling but hardly an outlier in Europe these days. Rather, the Netherlands’ problem is the ongoing bust in real estate, which has saddled households with mortgage debt exceeding 100% of GDP. Total household debt stands at 249% of GDP, the highest in the euro zone.

Unlike Spain and Ireland, where collapsing house prices have similarly threatened household and bank solvency, the Netherlands did not experience a construction boom that would have sent joblessness skyward when the real-estate bubble popped. Dutch unemployment is, for now, below 5%. But private debt has sapped consumption and investment, putting the country into recession since the third quarter of 2011. The country’s fiscal troubles are a consequence of its broader economic woes, not their cause.

That said, it’s worth asking why, with the stakes so high, Dutch lawmakers couldn’t agree on cuts and savings worth €14 billion—no small change but not insurmountable. The ruling coalition is grumbling about the obstinacy of Geert Wilders, the head of the euroskeptic Freedom Party. But markets began discounting the Netherlands months ago despite its gold-plated credit rating. Even without Mr. Wilders’s opposition to austerity, it was only a matter of time before market pressure would have political reverberations, as the examples of Greece, Ireland and Italy have shown.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2012-04-23 23:54:55

“Risk sharing” = somebody else helps to pay for your house

Origins of the Indebted American Homeowner
Equitable Mortgage Company
Source: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division
By R. Daniel Wadhwani
Apr 20, 2012 1:56 PM PT

Not long after the economic crisis began, the president’s landmark Conference on Homeownership reported that “down payments of 10 percent, 5 percent, and even nothing down” had become common practice in the home-mortgage market. Reliance on second mortgages and novel financing terms, the report noted, were also widespread.

Although these developments sound all too familiar, this Conference on Homeownership was held in 1931 and the president sponsoring it was Herbert Hoover, not George W. Bush or Barack Obama. We often think of the expansion of easy mortgage financing as a relatively recent development, but the growth of indebted homeownership has older and more complicated origins.

The rules and institutions for financing homeownership weren’t always as conducive to buying as they are today. In the 19th century, most Americans bought or built a home outright, or saved substantial nest eggs to make large down payments, because financial institutions either didn’t lend to average homebuyers or did so on relatively stringent terms. National banks were actually prohibited from lending on real estate and state banks typically limited mortgages to 50 percent of the underlying value of a property. Such loans also matured in a relatively short period, usually three to five years. These terms meant that buying a home often required years of saving and typically wasn’t an option for young families.

Although historians commonly view the New Deal as the moment that changed these lending practices, the easing of credit terms to homebuyers actually began decades earlier. In the late 19th century, many states sought to promote homeownership by passing legislation that enabled the formation of building-and-loan associations, which offered small amortized loans secured on homes. Building-and-loans were structured to accept lower down payments and make longer-maturity loans. Policy makers promoted them partly as conduits for ordinary Americans to gain greater economic security by accumulating property.

By the early 20th century, other types of institutional lenders started seeing mortgages as safe and attractive investments, especially as real estate prices rose in urban America. National banks successfully lobbied to relax the rules prohibiting them from lending on real estate. Residential mortgage lending by financial institutions grew about 20-fold from 1890 to 1930. As institutional lenders waded into the market, wealthy individuals and home sellers, who had once been the main suppliers of loans to homebuyers, were increasingly pushed into offering second mortgages with junior liens. By the 1910s and 1920s, these developments had made low-down-payment financing increasingly common.

Ordinary Americans welcomed these developments. For many, the easing of loan terms was crucial to buying into the American dream of economic stability and mobility. Homeownership became accessible even for relatively young families. As Robert and Helen Lynd noted in their 1920s study of Muncie, Indiana, the custom of “rent hunting” among newlyweds was steadily being replaced by home-buying. Labor Department studies from the period suggest that the expansion of indebted home-buying by young families was the linchpin in a broader shift in household economic planning that included increasing investment in children’s education, decreasing dependence on income from children and increased equity-building in the home in lieu of traditional saving.

Yet the expansion of indebted homeownership also introduced risks, which became clear during the Great Depression. In particular, for many buyers indebted homeownership entailed the risk of owning a highly leveraged asset at a moment in their economic lives when they were especially undiversified and vulnerable to shocks. The decline of real estate values during the Depression not only devastated these families, but also spilled over into the economy by inhibiting mobility, reinforcing downward pressure on home prices, and depressing personal consumption and investment.

New Deal programs responded by extending and institutionalizing credit practices in federal policy as a way of restimulating the borrowing that had become an essential element of economic growth. The Federal Housing Administration further extended the maturity of loans and assumed the risks that financial institutions bore in making them. And Fannie Mae created a secondary market for such loans. These programs were bold and novel in interjecting the federal government into real estate finance. But they were also betting that recovery would be based on re-establishing the trend toward indebted homeownership that had started decades earlier.

Our current housing problems force us to revisit the risks of indebted homeownership. Simple attempts to “fix” the American inclination for ownership by promoting renting seem naive in historical perspective. Long-held preferences for ownership in family economic planning; the cultural and political support for owning; and the economic interests of financial institutions have made indebted ownership a persistent feature of the U.S. economy — despite the crises it has experienced (and created) over the past century. A recent Pew Research Center poll found that 81 percent of Americans still believe that “buying a home is the best long-term investment a person can make.”

The idea that the pain created by the most-recent crisis will completely change such preferences seems misguided.

A more useful approach would be to mitigate the economic risks that indebted homeownership has introduced, particularly for highly leveraged and undiversified homeowners. A century of financial innovation and policy making has focused on making homeownership accessible. The same creativity ought to be devoted to the devising products, markets and policies to better deal with risks so that people can stay in their homes when crises arise. Risk-sharing policies and insurance innovations that protect homeowners against price fluctuations seem particularly promising.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post