May 3, 2012

Bits Bucket for May 3, 2012

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

265 Comments »

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 04:18:46

Realtors Are Liars®

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:08:16

Yep, and the sun rises in the east. The sky is also blue.

Wishin’ for a truth-tellin’ realty type…

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 15:46:54

We’re gonna be waitin’ and wishin’ a long time. These lying bastards are dangerous to your economic and financial well being.

 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2012-05-03 05:03:09

Came across this link that has all the Federal salaries. I looked u and most of my friends are in GS14-15 level with pretty decent pay. They are at par with private sector or even more.

http://php.app.com/fed_employees10/search.php

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 07:19:48

The army of federal contractors will NEVER stop growing. Our own field office contractor is hiring 3 more at about the GS-11 and GS-12 level. And just within the past month the squad has received inquiries from online resume about other contractor positions with the National Park Service and the VA.

Nothing to see here folks, just some bootstrapping, rugged individualist, invisible hand of the free market, paid for with your tax dollars!

Comment by Timmy
2012-05-03 07:39:15

… more like… paid for by your INFLATION dollars….

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 07:50:55

To Infinity and Beyond!

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 07:52:03

The park service must always have seasonal hiring as the summer season gets going. I wouldn’t read too much into that.

As for the VA, what sort of contractors? They have serious needs in certain areas. A lot of the recent vets have brain injury and psychological issues. And the Viet Nam era vets are getting older and certainly sicker. You have to look at these things in context. If Congress passes a law, agencies have to devote people to enforcing it. If the rest of the work load is the same, then you are going to get slower service or you have to hire more people. Same thing when the number of people who qualify for certain services expands. Either you hire more people to cover the new beneficiaries (people who get old, get sick and get poor, being the most obvious examples), or everyone gets slower service and a backlog builds up.

You can try to create better efficiencies, but the one thing that would really help (much better and well integrated software systems) don’t get created because the federal budgeting process pretty much kills them. A lot of it is premissed on stable budgeting from year to year. A lot of business database oriented software projects require a giant push over one or two years and then they can run themselves for 5 to 10 years or more. What you end up with is me still looking up alphanumeric codes on a printed out sheet of paper so bosses can see my project status on different items. A drop down menu with descriptions to choose from would be more efficient, but the whole system needs to be redesigned from scratch (and back engineered to be used with the database that is already in place). Of the admin systems I use, only one has been updated in the 7 years I’ve been here. And it only got attention because it was DOS based and the younger employees pretty much refused to do it.

Comment by WT Economist
2012-05-03 07:59:57

I wouldn’t worry too much about the federal workforce. It is tiny as a share of the economy, almost not even there if you exclude defense and the Post Office.

The Feds bring money in and pass money on to state and local governments, the health care sector, and individuals (ie. Social Security), and holders of debt.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2012-05-03 14:26:14

In 2010 the Executive Branch workforce was 2.13 Million people. 773,000 were in the military, leaving 1.36 Million civilian workers. That of course does NOT include civilian contractors. Postal service also not included.

Yep, just a “tiny” 22 percent of the overall economy.

www dot opm.gov/feddata/HistoricalTables/ExecutiveBranchSince1940.asp

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 08:04:47

These are not seasonal, outdoor positions with the NPS. They are procurement and analyst contractor positions.

On a related note, our field office has had a large number of senior feds taking early retirement. Some have not been replaced, but a few lower level feds have moved up the food chain. And those lower level feds are being replaced with, guess what…

<More contractors!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Montana
2012-05-03 08:45:45

polly, did air traffic control ever get its new system? there was a lot of publicity about their legacy system about 10 years ago..shockingly old technology.

Is there a common DB that feds use or is it a patchwork?

Being in the software industry, I can imagine how difficult the projects would be. We do muni stuff only. State of Montana has had enough of its own disaster implementations. Fed would be a nightmare.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 09:42:25

No clue about air traffic control.

The only stuff that feds have that are fed government wide (that I know of) are certain personnel systems. I think everybody uses the same thing to update address information and stuff like that. I don’t even know if our paychecks are all handled in the same place. We do have to submit “time sheets” on Tuesday and the pay cycle doesn’t even end until Saturday. If you get sick after Tuesday, you have to submit corrections and they cost your department.

Things that allow management to follow business processes aren’t even necessarily the same thoughout the agency. It is a real mess. Of course, trying to follow very different functions within an agency with the same software also can be a mess.

But that one DOS system was a nightmare. Complete and total. You had to tab through everything. Not only did the mouse not work, the arrow keys didn’t. And it is possible we still have the same system underneath and all they did was put a new user interface on top. I don’t care. It eliminates hours of work that it took to do the other one each month.

 
Comment by Montana
2012-05-03 12:36:43

Got to admit, fed web sites like SSA and IRS are pretty awesome.

 
Comment by marshall
2012-05-03 13:17:43

The Air Traffic control has not gotten their new system as of yet. I know this because my company (large defense contractor) is one of several who are trying to win business from the FAA. They are a very prickly group and have some strange ideas about how contractors have to act and perform. I get this info from project mgrs who have supported them.
You don’t even want to know how they track some of the planes these days. Seriously. There is software but for some of the “handling” we are talking heavy paper stock strips being passed around with flight plans and wind dir etc printed out on them. Don’t open the door too fast, it may blow away.

 
Comment by marshall
2012-05-03 13:19:06

The Air Traffic control has not gotten their new system as of yet. I know this because my company (large defense contractor) is one of several who are trying to win business from the FAA. They are a very prickly group and have some strange ideas about how contractors have to act. I get this info from project mgrs who have supported them.
You don’t even want to know how they track some of the planes these days. Seriously. There is software but for some of the “handling” we are talking heavy paper stock strips being passed around with flight plans and wind dir etc printed out on them. Don’t open the door too fast, it may blow away.

 
Comment by CharlieTango
2012-05-03 13:45:03

Much of the burden of upgrading to ADS-B is on the aircraft owners, equipment has to be installed in all aircraft.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 14:45:06

Paging our former GS Fixer, got a discussion that needs your input!

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 14:56:47

I know this because my company…

Your employer, or your company?

 
 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 13:55:44

“Nothing to see here folks, just some bootstrapping, rugged individualist, invisible hand of the free market, paid for with your tax dollars!”

Are you implying that free market mantra might be a… sham?!

Rigged?!

Fixed?!

Gamed?!

A big fat lie?!

 
 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 14:54:45

I looked u and most of my friends are in GS14-15 level with pretty decent pay.

Your friends are high achievers as “GS14-15″ are managers or highly skilled (think risk) individuals. They are not typical nor do they occupy the 1st SD of the bell curve as far as ranking federal employment.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2012-05-03 05:12:08

Mitt sez:

“Let’s fight for the America we love”

Palmy say:

“Which America would that be?” (Because I think Mitty and I live in two different Americas. And I”m not gonna fight for his America)

BTW, I nearly got a beat-down yesterday from a couple of old biddies when I said I was going to vote for Ron Paul. You would have thought I’d advocated baby-killing. Priceless quote of the whole exchange:

“You can vote your conscience during the primary, but not in the general election.”

My hand to God, this really was said.

Comment by combotechie
2012-05-03 05:16:57

“You can vote your conscience during the primary, but not in the general election.”

A nation of sheep.

Comment by palmetto
2012-05-03 05:19:09

Baaaaaaaa, baaaaaaa, really.

I couldn’t believe it.

Comment by combotechie
2012-05-03 05:26:23

My interest in politics has shrunk down to where it approaches zero.

It seems to me we really have only one party that is in control and this party is made up of two factions - Reps and Dems - and the whole election process seems to be nothing but a Big Game.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Awaiting
2012-05-03 05:35:07

Gerald Celente (a trend analyst), succinctly calls our political system a snake with two heads.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 05:37:22

“My interest in politics has shrunk down to where it approaches zero.” ;-)

Cheney-Shrub $hadow Legacy Hi$tory Le$$on # 4: “…he has “Yellow-Cake!” + he tried to kill my Daddy!”"

$tart @ x2 Trillion$ + [blood] & keep on-a-countin’!

Coming $oon!: “Audit-The-Pentagon!”

Pending [ In the People's house of "TheTrueAngry's!"]:

“Audit-The-Federal Re$erve Inc.!”

Meanwhile back @ El Rancho U$A:

Job$! Job$! Job$!

+

“Do you like the price of my $tucco?”

:-/

 
Comment by combotechie
2012-05-03 05:44:34

“… a snake with two heads.”

A good comparison. A snake with two heads that has its own agenda and is always looking for ways to get fed.

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 05:45:34

It seems to me we really have only one party that is in control and this party is made up of two factions - Reps and Dems - and the whole election process seems to be nothing but a Big Game.

+1 Queue up a dog biscuit.

 
Comment by palmetto
2012-05-03 05:48:21

“always looking for ways to get fed.”

Rent seekers. Always looking for the rent to be paid to them.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-05-03 06:27:17

I’m a delegate to the state convention here in just over a week. We may have a little surprise for the establishment.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 06:31:46

Rent seekers indeed….and the rest of us.

The picture of success for the average person is to be selected to pay the most interest on their borrowed future.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 06:49:52

Good for you Ben!

 
Comment by michael
2012-05-03 07:15:33

“My interest in politics has shrunk down to where it approaches zero.”

That’s because you…like most of us here…have taken the blue pill. You have awoken and realized that not only is war politics by another means…but more importantly…politics is economics by another means.

It’s always about the money…whether you are a democrat or a republican…it’s always about the money.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 07:18:05

“It seems to me we really have only one party… ”

Is there something wrong with Corporate Communist Capitalism?

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-05-03 08:36:20

Would love to be a fly on the wall in the presidential suite when all those Paul delegates get toTampa Bay. I suppose the good part is that Romney is so plastic in his positions that some back room concessions are inevitable. A Paul VP or cabinet position would pretty much ensure the campaign support of all those enthusiastic younger voters– which let’s face it, Romney is in desperate need of co-opting.

As a Californian (also delegate,) I can’t TELL you how much I resent that the yahoos of Iowa and South Carolina get to pick our presidential candidates in the media while our (considerable,) Pacific Coast voices are essentially unheard.

Hope you guys can pull a noisy coup at the convention, Ben. I’m looking forward to a shake-up, if only to bring a little drama into what promises to be an otherwise tedious summer campaign.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-05-03 08:37:33

Ben, you are killing the commies here by being for Ron Paul.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 08:55:32

I’m a delegate to the state convention here in just over a week. We may have a little surprise for the establishment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOxZKDyOBkg

What is this crap? I clicked on the link and it looks like a smear piece on Paul. A Soviet-style campaign poster at the end, white nationalism, spelling errors.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 09:26:34

Agree, neuromance. “Zionist media?” Over 50% of delegates in 8 states? I don’t get it…

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 10:16:36

I just looked at the video again. The video itself is ridiculous but relatively innocuous. But I clicked on americaisbacktrump’s profile and it looks quite professional. His profile image is that of Gaddafi with the caption “Hero” underneath it. There is a crisp, professional background picture of Ron Paul next to all kinds of white nationalist videos.

The poster however is trolling. I saw this video he had uploaded previously:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5vXbeJOJug

The featured speaker in that video is Gary Bauer, a noted evangelical conservative who served as president of the Family Research Council. He spends the video bashing Paul.

The poster is trying to associate Ron Paul with white nationalism and anti-semitism. That video contains a donation link to this organization:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Committee_for_Israel

So yes, I think several of us were trolled. Very nicely done troll though. A more polished anti-Paul smear campaign than I usually see.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2012-05-03 10:27:32

Ben, you are killing the commies here by being for Ron Paul.

Yeah, I’m gonna have to stay on heart attack alert for my far left in-law. She hates Paul and has been celebrating her perspective (it’s only true if it’s come from some MSM bubblehead’s lips) that he’s out.

 
Comment by Steve J
2012-05-03 13:15:43

Rand Paul as VP…it’s a done deal.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 13:50:28

“Ben, you are killing the commies here by being for Ron Paul.”

Oh please.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 15:54:34

That’s because you…like most of us here…have taken the blue pill. You have awoken and realized that not only is war politics by another means…but more importantly…politics is economics by another means.

It’s always about the money…whether you are a democrat or a republican…it’s always about the money.

x eleventyzillion

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-05-03 20:52:16

Colorado commie and excretory commie took the bait. I was hoping the other lovers of the nanny/police state would get a rise: oxide, Alpha, Grizzly, meathead,,,

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-05-03 20:53:26

And of course Rio

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2012-05-03 09:28:56

“A nation of sheep.”

My 80 year old mil’s favorite saying: We did it that way because that’s how things were done. No kidding! I have to shake my head and walk away. Thinking for oneself almost looked down upon because that’s not “how things are done”.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-03 12:17:16

I received similar feedback. Regarding the current duopoly that some friends agree isn’t working: “Well, that’s the system and it will take decades to change.”

Uh, well, yeah but it certainly can’t change if you don’t create that change doofae, was essentially my reply.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:01:56

My favorite pt peeve saying? “Don’t hate the playas, hate the game.”

My reply? “There would be NO game without the playas, fool.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:35:27

How do the Republicans expect to “take America back” if all they have to offer is empty rhetoric?

Comment by scdave
2012-05-03 07:28:53

How do the Republicans expect to “take America back” if all they have to offer is empty rhetoric ??

IMO, the party tacked hard right with Bush and the criminal Cheney in 2000…They re-upped in 2004 with the fear & anger card and a questionable election victory..

They are now stuck in the mud with Limpy, Shawn, Beck & Nugent and the millions who think like they do…Proud to say I left after the 2000 election….

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 09:07:04

“… They are now stuck in the mud with Limpy, Shawn, Beck & Nugent and the millions who think like they do”

Bless you. Cheers!

Ike was right! [War Inc.$] …& so was Jimmay! [Oil Inc.$] & Ronnie’s wife: “Ju$t $ay No!” :-)

Guy walks into a bar and says: “I’m “Fi$cal Conservative & a Christian”
Bartender says: “…where do ya work?”
Guy says: “Raytheon Defense Systems”
Bartender says: “…what do ya do?”
Guy says: “What does it look like I do?”
Bartender says: “did you get a free bowl of soup with that tie?”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:00:38

They are now stuck in the mud with Limpy, Shawn, Beck & Nugent and the millions who think like they do…Proud to say I left after the 2000 election….

And they own them… ALL of them. Including the Bin Laden Fundamentalists like Tony Perkins, Bryan Fischer, James Dobson and the rest of the sex freaks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by butters
2012-05-03 07:40:50

Worked for Obama so Romney probably thinks it will work for him, too.

Good hair and magic underwear, that’s the ticket!

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-05-03 08:39:28

I don’t want to go back. It was dark in there.

 
 
Comment by Hi-Z
2012-05-03 07:27:48

“BTW, I nearly got a beat-down yesterday from a couple of old biddies when I said I was going to vote for Ron Paul.”

Unless he runs as a third party candidate, you won’t have that option to argue about.

Comment by drumminj
2012-05-03 07:39:26

Unless he runs as a third party candidate, you won’t have that option to argue about.

Sure you will - one can always write him in.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-03 12:20:56

Not sure how it works elsewhere, but I think he has to declare for a particular state for your vote to count. Hoping he’s on for the OR ballot, otherwise I’ll be one of the crazies writing in Bart Simpson, or the like.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 07:41:18

My hand to god?… of course this is what was said. Were you living under a rock in Florida in 2000?

Comment by polly
2012-05-03 08:10:56

I count anyone who wants to eliminate vast swathes of government spending, understands that voting for Mitt won’t really accomplish that and decides to vote third party instead as a win, oxide.

Comment by Ben Jones
2012-05-03 08:26:57

‘In Massachusetts, delegates to the Republican National Convention (RNC) are chosen by vote in these District caucuses, three delegates in each CD. The delegates are bound by oath to vote for the winner of the state primary, Mitt Romney this year, but only on the first ballot for president…The Paulites were out in force with their slate of delegates. The establishment marshaled its forces for the Mitt Romney slate. It was not hard to tell who was who in the auditorium; the older part of the crowd was with Mitt and those with kids in strollers belonged to Ron Paul. When the votes were tallied, the Liberty slate won by a 2:1 margin!’

‘That scenario was repeated again and again in most of the 9 congressional districts, with the Liberty slate trouncing the Romney gang and winning 17 of 27 delegates chosen by the caucuses.

‘http://blogs.providencejournal.com/ri-talks/this-new-england/2012/05/john-walsh-obomney-takes-a-hit-in-mass.html

‘NEVADA: The RNC warned Nevada Republicans that if Ron Paul delegates “are allowed to take too many slots for the national convention, Nevada’s entire contingent may not be seated in Tampa,” the Jon Ralston reports via Political Wire.’

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/03/11519540-more-2012-massachusetts-heats-up

‘Last fall, Jay Dardenne won more than half a million votes to be re-elected lieutenant governor of Louisiana. But last Saturday he only mustered 288 votes in the Republican Party caucuses, placing 51st in the competition for 25 delegate slots from the new Sixth Congressional District.’

‘Dardenne, who was backing former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for president, was not alone among the ranks of accomplished vote-getters who didn’t get many votes in the caucuses. That helps explain why Ron Paul’s forces carried the day, sweeping the delegate slots in four of the state’s six new Congressional Districts and gaining at least 17 delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa in August.’

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/05/jay_dardenne_among_big_name_vo.html

I could go on, but you get the idea.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 11:46:44

I’m still not sure I understand. Are you saying that the delegates are loyal to Paul and will vote for him at the convention even if their state party rules require them to vote for Romney (or Newt or Santorum)? Or that they will do it on the second ballot? I don’t think there is going to be a second ballot. All the early coverage was about a “path” to more than half the delegates.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-05-03 11:57:37

Not all states are winner take all. Santorum and Gingrich delegates are unbound. Here in AZ the delegates to the national convention have pledged to make a ‘best effort’ to vote for Romney on the first ballot. But at the state convention, we are voting for delegates to the national convention, not the presidential candidates themselves.

I don’t know what the strategies are going to be. But this might be one of them:

‘The RNC warned Nevada Republicans that if Ron Paul delegates “are allowed to take too many slots for the national convention, Nevada’s entire contingent may not be seated in Tampa”

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 12:29:22

I’m aware that they aren’t all winner take all. There are also a lot of general big shots who get to go. Most (nearly all) of them will vote for Romney.

Newt has $4M of campaign debt to settle. His people are certanly in negotiations with Romney’s people right now to get some money in exchange for their support. Of course, he can’t control what his delegates will do, but he can tell them what he wants them to do. Not sure what Santorum’s situation is, but it all becomes irrelevant if Romney wins on the first ballot. I haven’t seen a chart with the delegate count recently. Has anyone else?

And not letting a whole state’s delegation be seated would be very exciting, but I’m not sure if it would change the final outcome. Getting people very, very angry helps for the next set of primaries, not the general election.

Of course, a ton of potential Republican voters writing in Ron Paul instead and throwing the election to the President is possible. That would shake up the Republican party quite a bit, but it is mostly talk until the election after, and that is 2 years out. Plus you would still have the same president for another 4 years.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2012-05-03 19:54:27

‘The RNC warned Nevada Republicans that if Ron Paul delegates “are allowed to take too many slots for the national convention, Nevada’s entire contingent may not be seated in Tampa”

Translation: Don’t be silly people, and think you have a choice.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 08:48:53

The real wasted vote is voting for the broken status quo.

The two candidates/parties are two heads of the same hydra.

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 09:42:04

Yeah but when it comes down to choosing between parties who are BOTH pro-war, BOTH pro-bailouts, BOTH owned by Wall Street and the criminal cartel Federal Reserve, I’ll vote for the one that doesn’t want to treat women like it’s the 19th century. I’ll reluctantly take secular humanism (with all its baggage) over fundamentalist religious nutjobs who think the world is 6,000 years old and that the Rapture is imminent.

Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 10:33:07

It’s unfortunate. It’s like being offered the choice of taking a bite from a 1 inch thick sh-t sandwich or a 1.5 inch thick sh-t sandwich.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:05:34

What? Nobody told ME there was bread!!

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 15:35:11

Only the very best of the hoi polloi get bread *look down nose at lurkey*

My kind, we get bread. It’s quite the luxury. I’m proud of my bread. It really complements the taste of the sh-t.

And get this, one day, they gave me a cracker. Ohhh let me tell you something, it was glorious. A bit of salt, a delicate texture - magnificent. I was almost able to eat my entire ration of sh-t with just that one cracker.

:)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-05-03 05:26:36

Palmy
People’s political beliefs are a religion. Just like religion, it brings out the possessed.

Comment by palmetto
2012-05-03 05:32:02

“it brings out the possessed.”

I’m tellin’ ya. My interest in politics is, like combo’s, mild to zero. Hence, I never understand the rabidity of response to an innocuous comment about my choice of candidate.

Would that these people were a little more passionate about other issues.

Comment by Awaiting
2012-05-03 05:46:50

The same is true for religious zealots who refuse to let you just “be”, and cram their Jebus or hell down your throat, and you just want to shop for food.

Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 06:35:26

Humans really want/need to join clubs, be told what to do, what to think and be surrounded by other people in agreement. Their compulsion to share this joy with you may be sincere. Most riders do not have a ticket all the way to the terminal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Montana
2012-05-03 14:39:35

I dunno, seems like nowadays people have to dragged kicking and screaming to join a club (unless they’re a Realtor or financial advisor on the make) yet they’ll willingly pay to a sporting event to scream along with The Crowd like a fool.

Just a different kind of communion I guess.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 05:27:24

The mind-$et of the Federal Re$erve Inc. is going Global: :-)

“I see nothing wrong with beautifying our surrounding$. We are not trying to keep the poor out of the picture,” he said.

Philippines erect$ wall to ob$cure view of slum$:
Associated Press – 3 hrs ago

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Delegates attending an international conference in the Philippines capital may not see what they came to discuss:

abject poverty.

A makeshift, temporary wall has been erected across a bridge on a road from the airport to downtown Manila that hides a sprawling slum along a garbage-strewn creek.

Presidential spokesman Ricky Carandang defended the wall’s installation, saying Thursday “any country will do a little fixing up before a gue$t comes.”

He expressed hope that this week’s annual meeting of Asian Development Bank Board of Governors, which includes finance minister$ and senior official$ from 67 member states, will show the Philippines is open for busine$$. The lending in$titution, which is headquartered in its own walled compound in Manila, aims to cut poverty in the Asia-Pacific region.

“We need to show our visitors that Metro Manila is orderly. We owe it to ourselves,” said metropolitan Manila chief Francis Tolentino.

“I see nothing wrong with beautifying our surroundings. We are not trying to keep the poor out of the picture,” he said.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 07:23:47

I wonder what it would cost to clean the creek.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 08:51:07

You mean the invisible hand didn’t take care of it?

I remember how bad the smog was in LA when I was a kid. And there were a lot LESS people living there back then. Had it not been for “business unfriendly regulations” I imagine that LA would now have as bad or even worse smog than Mexico City does on a really bad thermal inversion day.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:12:06

El DF is sometimes referred to as Cochetitlan. “Coche” is an informal word for “car.” And “Titlan” is what the indigenous people call a city.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 09:59:50

About 20 years ago I flew into Mexico City. The smog that day was so bad that day, there was this haze above the city that had zero visibility. I couldn’t see the ground until we were just a few hundred feet above it. Our connection was to Ixtapa, and just seconds after take off we were back iinto the smoggy soup.

The winter thermal inversions are so bad that they now have switched summer break with winter. They don’t want kids going to school when the smog is that bad. The kids are encouraged to stay indoors during the winter. I’m sure the air indoors is any better, but they are probably not active so it doesn’t affect them as much.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 10:21:40

And “Titlan” is what the indigenous people call a city

It’s the Nahuatl (Aztec) word for city. Not all indigenous Mexicans speak Nahuatl, some speak other languages.

Mexico City’s predecessor was called Tenochtitlan.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 11:13:43

Thanks for clearing that up, In Colorado. I thought that “Titlan” was a Nahuatl (Aztec) word, but I wasn’t sure.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 13:39:27

No problem! :-)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:02:08

Is France still a socialist country these days?

Why are French policy makers offering unsolicited advice on U.S. domestic wealth redistribution?

Isn’t this sort of question supposed to be for Congress to decide?

(Let me guess: Her position as IMF chief gives Lagarde free rein to make unsolicited policy prescriptions to sovereign governments around the world.)

IMF chief Lagarde calls for U.S. mortgage relief

View Photo Gallery — Christine Lagarde, IMF’s first female managing director: The International Monetary Fund tapped Lagarde in June to be its first female managing director. Here’s a look at what she has been doing since taking the helm at the fund and the road she took to get there.

By Howard Schneider, Published: April 12

International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde called on the U.S. government to reduce the mortgage debt owed by homeowners as a way help to revive the nation’s economy and stimulate growth in the wider industrialized world.

Speaking Thursday at the Brookings Institution, Lagarde urged that this relief be extended to loans held by mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The issue of whether to reduce mortgages held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, representing more than half of U.S. home loans, has become contentious in Washington in recent months.

Comment by measton
2012-05-03 07:53:19

This has nothing to do with redistributing the wealth.
She wants the tax payer to let these people off so they can then pay off their loans to the banks and take out new loans from the banks.

Everything these central bankers do is for the large banks.

Comment by scdave
2012-05-03 08:24:36

+1….Has nothing to do with saving the minions and everything to do with bailing out the lenders…

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 10:15:15

How is handing a select group of individual households an average of $51,000 a piece in unearned income not about wealth redistribution?

Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 10:34:21

Reverse Robin Hood effect :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:09:02

You’re thinking of the “Sheriff of Nottingham” effect.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Al
2012-05-03 12:06:18

“Why are French policy makers offering unsolicited advice on U.S. domestic wealth redistribution? ”

Yes, because US politicians would never meddle in affairs outside their own borders….

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 13:12:55

Please show me an example of where any high level U.S. policy maker has made recommendations to the French government on how to conduct their internal economic affairs so I can better understand your point.

Comment by Steve J
2012-05-03 13:19:43

US State Department meddling in France: This time it’s to “increase diversity”.

Activist Abdelaziz Dahhassi established a think tank to find new ways of “fighting ethnic and religious discrimination” in France. Where did backing for the venture come from? The U.S. State Department.

A series of Wikileaked cables reveals U.S. Ambassador Charles Rivkin has an “ambitious agenda meant to ‘amplify France’s efforts to realize its own egalitarian ideals, thereby advancing U.S. national interests.’” Orwellian much?

So in short, the United States is surreptitiously using your tax dollars to fund politically correct social engineering programs in other countries. Wonderful. Oh, and we should point out that Rivkin was one of the many Obama donors who got plum ambassadorships in exchange for their brib… er… contributions. We called that one back in 2009.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:10:46

And this is just the tip of the TIP of the iceberg.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 14:23:15

Interesting. Who directs the U.S. state department these days?

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 22:16:10

Interesting. Who directs the U.S. state department these days?

God’s children.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:04:17

Housing regulator scolds lawmakers over principal reductions letter
By Vicki Needham - 05/01/12 05:05 PM ET

The federal housing overseer for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shot back at lawmakers on Tuesday over allegations he hasn’t provided Congress with documents that would reflect the benefits reducing mortgage principal on government-backed loans.

Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco sent a same-day response on Tuesday to House Democrats Elijah Cummings (Md.) and John Tierney (Mass.), scolding them for releasing confidential information and alleging he had not been completely forthcoming in his testimony before Congress.

“I wish to convey my disappointment with this letter, the failure to contact FHFA to address your concerns, and the release of selective elements of the proprietary and confidential materials you received,” DeMarco wrote to the lawmakers, who sent their letter out earlier Tuesday.

“I strongly disagree with any characterization of FHFA’s work or motives as anything but in keeping with the professionalism expected of this agency,” he wrote.

“Throughout FHFA’s communications with you and the committee, we have focused on getting to the facts and the supporting information and analytics in what is a most important matter for homeowners and taxpayers.”

As part of the response, FHFA released an April 12 letter, which DeMarco said contained information requested by the lawmakers, as well as summaries of principal forgiveness pilot programs.

Cummings, ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and Tierney, a panel member, wrote DeMarco asking him why he hadn’t told lawmakers about a proposed pilot program that would have provided, with an assist from Citibank, homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages and current on their payments with mortgage principal reductions.

The lawmakers said they had received documents from an independent source that brought into question whether DeMarco had withheld some information from Congress.

The exchanges comes as Democratic lawmakers press the agency to consider reducing principal on some loans.

Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 06:27:43

More free obama money on the way…

The exchanges comes as Democratic lawmakers press the agency to consider reducing principal on some loans.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:33:44

Why do you say it is “on the way”? Where is your party on this whole issue? Do they think political principles can be upheld by remaining silent?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 16:55:35

Here they are…very impressive letter, I must say.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 07:58:55

More free obama money on the way…

I’ll believe it when I see it.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:13:21

Yeah, I could use some of that free money too. Darn money. Only kind I can find is the sort that I have to work for.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:11:51

The only kind I find is the kind that is owed to other people. :(

 
 
 
Comment by measton
2012-05-03 08:29:13

2banana

Go to Zfacts.com and take a look at who has handed out the free money. Most of the deficit we’ve had over the last 3 years is due to tax cuts and increased spending on medicaid and unemployment due to the bursting credit bubble. If you want to look at big spenders I’d start with the peopel who drove up the debt during the good times. Hint - No bid contracts are handing out free money. Medicare prescription drug plan is handing out free money. Tax cuts for the elite that have them paying an effective tax rate 10% less than me is handing out free money.

Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 09:11:48

So obama biggest problem is just that he is just a huge tax cutter????

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:15:32

You know, every time I see your handle, I think of the proper number of bananas in a smoothie. Any more than that, the taste of banana just overwhelms the other ingredients.

With that said, I’d like to invite the HBB cooking SIG to submit favorite smoothie recipes. Links to your own cooking blog are welcome!

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 09:53:42

“So obama biggest problem is just that he is just a huge tax cutter????”

Well, he did renew the Bush tax cuts, plus he gave us the SS tax holiday. And if he’s re-elected he’ll probably renew them both in 2013.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 11:29:33

he’ll probably renew them both in 2013

Obama can’t renew the tax cuts by himself. He needs Congress. And I suspect that the Senate Dems — at Obama’s encouragement — will demand to renew tax cuts only on the $250K and below crowd. I think the Republicans will take the Senate in 2012, but remember, they need 60 votes.

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 11:52:14

2013 = after election = whole new world

Even if the president is re-elected, it is a whole new world. Not necessarily in what can’t get done, but the reasons for not being able to get it done and the visuals about not getting it done and…just a whole new world. I can’t even begin to speculate.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-03 12:32:43

Obama’s biggest problem is that, upon winning, he didn’t immediately demand a recount.

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 22:19:37

You know, every time I see your handle, I think of the proper number of bananas in a smoothie.

Reminds me of a former girlfriend.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 16:34:32

My hunch is that DeMarco has ample political cover, thanks to his being squarely in the middle of a tug-of-war between the two parties on this issue. I would be interested in hearing from anyone who believes I am wrong, and that the Democrats will be able to force him to implement principal reductions before the November 2012 election.

Unless their sole objective was to open up a wedge issue on housing during campaign season, it appears the Democrats have overplayed their hand.

House Republicans urge housing regulator to remain steadfast on principal reductions
By Vicki Needham - 05/03/12 05:37 PM ET

Two House Republicans are urging a federal housing regulator to resist pressure by Democrats to offer mortgage principal reductions on government-backed loans before completing an evaluation of its merits.

House Government Reform and Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) on Thursday wrote to Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Acting Director Edward DeMarco urging him to “carefully evaluate relevant information prior to making a decision that could cost taxpayers billions if the government were to pay down the principal value of underwater mortgages for select homeowners.”

“As conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, you have a unique obligation to preserve and conserve the assets and property of [Fannie and Freddie],” wrote Issa and McHenry, chairman of the Subcommittee on TARP, Financial Services and Bailouts of Public and Private Programs.

Earlier this week, DeMarco said he would need more time to complete an examination of the policy and make a decision about how Fannie and Freddie would proceed.

House Democrats and the Obama Administration have been pressuring DeMarco to clearly show why he has, so far, been reluctant to consider principal reductions, especially when some preliminary data shows savings for taxpayers.

“We regret that the tenor of the housing debate in this country has become increasingly politicized and that your integrity and independence of your office have been directly challenged,” Issa and McHenry wrote.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:10:11

I can’t find this guy. He seems to be promising a bundle of everything to everybody which does not pencil out; that, despite his reputation as some kind of financial wizard, due to how much money he made in private business.

Case in point: The Democrats are pounding poor Ed DeMarco into submission over their desire for $35 bn in mortgage principal reductions (aka unearned income) at F&F. Where are the Republicans? Where is Romney? Will they remain silent on other huge domestic policy issues if they regain the WH?

Bloomberg News
Romney’s Conflicting Tax Goals Make Burden Shift Likely
By Richard Rubin on May 02, 2012

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s tax plan rests on a set of principles that, taken together, are difficult to reconcile.

Romney wants to reduce individual income tax rates by 20 percent, keep preferential rates for capital gains and dividends, broaden the tax base to limit revenue loss, and retain the tax-burden distribution across income groups.

Those goals are in conflict and will require that Romney consider limiting or eliminating the tax breaks for charitable deductions and home mortgage interest, said Martin Sullivan, contributing editor at Tax Analysts in Falls Church, Virginia.

“As soon as he gets in, he’s going to have to start backpedaling big-time on all of his promises,” Sullivan said. “It’s just not doable under any conceivable, realistic scenario.”

Comment by combotechie
2012-05-03 06:17:17

“As soon as he gets in, he’s going to have to start backpedaling big-time on all of his promises.”

LOL. Now there’s a first.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:30:32

That’s a big difference between Romney’s and Obama’s positions. Romney can claim that Obama wrecked the economy and hasn’t done enough to fix it, without either telling anyone what he would have done differently, or how he would have paid for it.

Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 06:40:01

This sentence would work well if the names were changed and the date was back some multiple of four years.

The only position of interest to either of these guys is that coveted seat at the head of the bus. It’s not about where the bus is going.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 07:02:45

Darn that math.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 08:30:46

Value-Added Tax would raise tons for US coffers

A tax only on consumption does not tax returns on capital. While most of the base-broadening proposals in plans such as Simpson-Bowles are sound, one recommendation is pernicious: to tax capital gains and dividends at the same rate as ordinary income. Rather than making the tax code more neutral, the change would actually make the double taxation of equity investments more distorting. The VAT offers a way to expand tax collections without going after capital

Ah, yes… untouchable “capital”. Create a consumption tax that hits everyone, especially the bottom 90%. Those in the 1-3% have plenty of money to continue consumption by treating capital gains as sacrsanct. Cui bono?

Who has all the money again? Why should the bottom 97% take the tax hit while the top 3% get privileged treatment?

Here’s an idea: Get rid of federal income tax completely. Create the VAT tax and tax capital gains at 50%. There… plenty of tax revenue to go around and the little people can save if they don’t spend it all on iCrap and Government Motors while the big shots don’t get to keep all the money

Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 08:46:04

So would non “Government Motors” cars be exempt from the VAT? Or was that just a pot shot at GM (which beat expected earnings)?

Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 08:56:28

o would non “Government Motors” cars be exempt from the VAT? Or was that just a pot shot at GM (which beat expected earnings)?

Was just a pot shot at GM… while attempting to make the point that if the bottom 97% stopped spending all their take-home on $50k Yukon SUV’s and Sierra pickups, they might have a bit more to save and invest…

I like many GM vehicles, I just despise the government bailout and reaming GM bond holders took. Ford managed to turn things around while playing by the rules. GM, not so much… yet here we are, “beating earnings estimates”. Of course they are, they managed to dump a whole lot of debt and lower wages/pensions while sucking at the bosom of the Treasury.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 15:12:16

” Ford managed to turn things around while playing by the rules.”

Not really. Ford is up to its eyeballs in debt and in a much more precarious position than GM or Chrysler.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 15:58:46

Not really. Ford is up to its eyeballs in debt and in a much more precarious position than GM or Chrysler.

ISTR reading that Ford mortgaged everything. Including that big logo on the building in Dearborn.

 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-03 08:52:44

Get rid of federal income tax completely. Create the VAT tax and tax capital gains at 50%

I like it.

Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 09:13:34

Unfortunately my proposal would never pass muster as it benefits labor and “penalizes” two core demographics that vote and contribute heavily via campaign contributions and lobbyists: retirees and the wealthy (top 3%).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 09:49:36

How would it penalize the retiree?. If they have a paid off house and Medicare, their only expense would be food, electricity, co-pays, and a few luxuries like internet so they can see pix of the grandkids.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 09:58:58

How would it penalize the retiree?

Retirees would feel the sting of the VAT and higher capital gains on retirement accounts while seeing very little benefit in the elimination of federal income tax.

Of course, you could exempt a certain amount, say the first 10%, so as not to penalize those living off of investments in retirement. I hate to start getting into exemptions and such as they tend to complicate things…

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 11:58:11

Retirement accounts are taxed as ordinary income, not capital gains. Only retirees with substantial portfolios outside of their retirement accounts care about capital gains. Pretty small fraction of the whole and they are the wealthier ones.

Is the 50% cap gains rate meant to be the 35% corporate rate plus the 15% current dividend rate? Do you include eliminating the corporate income tax? So it is just the current corporate rate plus the current (extremely low) cap gains rate and you only pay it when you sell your shares? That is a nice boondoggle for the big corporations.

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 12:02:52

Oxide,

It penalizes savers in general because they paid taxes on their income while they were saving and now have to pay taxes on it while they spend it. If you are a borrower, not a saver, you got to buy your stuff before buying it was a taxable event and then pay it off with income that isn’t taxed as income. Not really applicable if most of your savings was done in tax advantaged retirement accounts. It is a pretty big hit to the economics of the ROTH IRAs without some pretty complex transition rules.

The moment of transition from income tax to VAT (if you eliminate the income tax part) is a huge hit to savers.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 16:24:44

Honestly Polly, I’m not sure how to change the tax code to take into account corporate/business tax law… all I know is the current tax system is completely warped, overly complicated, and benefits the 1% as well as large multinationals.

The point I am trying to get at with the idea above is to simplify the code,tax consumption instead of labor, and reduce the benefits capital gains has over labor. I’m sure the brains here on the HBB can take it come up with something that would actually work…

 
 
 
Comment by Hi-Z
2012-05-03 12:07:07

“Here’s an idea: Get rid of federal income tax completely. Create the VAT tax and tax capital gains at 50%”

The Capital Gains tax IS federal income tax.

Comment by Steve J
2012-05-03 13:22:26

Capital gains % is not dependent on income level.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-05-03 12:54:14

Why don’t Republicans just propose a 100% tax on all income over $50,000. And claim it will spur the economy by making people work harder to avoid starvation?

Notice how no one proposes replacing the regressive payroll tax with a regressive VAT. Nope, get rid of the regressive income tax, keep the regressive payroll tax, and add a regressive income tax to it.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:12:09

Why don’t Republicans just propose a 100% tax on all income over $50,000. And claim it will spur the economy by making people work harder to avoid starvation?

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 15:50:22

Wouldn’t taxing value have the undesirable effect of reducing value? Why would you want to tax something on the margin that is in the collective interest? (Same comment could be applied to taxing income…)

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:15:08

Obama has a mortgage plan. What do the Republicans have to offer in return? Silence?

Obama’s Election-Year Mortgage Plan
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Written by:
Shanthi Bharatwaj

President Barack Obama has made economic stimulus a priority in his administration and much of that effort has been focused in revitalizing the housing industry. To do so, Obama has tweaked federal programs to help distressed borrowers avoid defaulting on their mortgages and it is no accident many of his initiatives are targeted at the middle class home-loan borrower. Critics argue Obama has not done enough and that programs like the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) and the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) have been largely ineffective. Many also believe that government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not doing enough to help. Even so, Obama continues to make refinancing available to struggling homeowners with hopes that more will be able to take advantage. For more on this continue reading the following article from TheStreet.

Housing has been among the top priorities for the Obama administration heading into the election year, with the government announcing a slew of measures aimed at providing relief to troubled borrowers in the past few months.

Many of the recent proposals are just tweaks to existing programs and the jury is still out on whether they will provide enough relief to borrowers to prevent them from defaulting and losing their home to foreclosure.

But the announcements of such measures play an important part in framing the narrative for the Obama re-election campaign.

“Most of these measures are aimed at the middle class. It is a calculated strategy of appealing to those most likely to vote,” said David Johnson, CEO, of political consulting agency Strategic Vision and a senior Republican consultant who worked on Bob Dole’s1988 Presidential campaign.

Through these mortgage relief programs, the administration is advancing its claim that it is “fighting for the middle class” and that Republicans, who are against further government intervention in housing, are ” out of touch,” with the plight of average American, says Johnson.

Housing remains among the few macro-economic indicators that is yet to show any sign of improvement in a slowly recovering economy.

While not as critical an issue as, say, job growth when it comes to determining who wins the election, housing policy has always been a political hot potato and there is nothing quite like stories of people losing homes to stir politicians into “doing something.”

“”I’m not one of those people who believe that we just sit by and wait for the housing market to hit bottom,” Obama said at a news conference, in an obvious shot at Governor Mitt Romney, who previously suggested that foreclosures be allowed to run their course. “There are real things we can do right now that would make a substantial difference in the lives of innocent, responsible homeowners.”

Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 06:41:20

How about stop the insane spending and stop the insane bailout programs that do not work????

Obama has a mortgage plan. What do the Republicans have to offer in return? Silence?

Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 09:01:11

How about stop the insane spending and stop the insane bailout programs that do not work????

Exactly. This is right out of animal farm: some animals (homeowners) are more equal than others…

How about we start following the rule of law and stop promoting moral hazard?

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 13:10:07

Rather than ranting on about your own partisan perspectives, why not address the point I raised, which is that Republicans have offered no response to Obama’s mortgage program, by proving me wrong with a link to contrary evidence?

Comment by CharlieTango
2012-05-03 13:30:59

The Democrats have failed to respond to Republican budgets for 3 years now. A budget for the largest Economy on earth when running trillion dollar deficits is a primary responsibility of the congress.

Compare that to the Republican’s responsibility to respond to another Obama transfer of wealth, a program that is certainly destined to failure as were the previous attempts, a program burdened with moral hazard and you can see your question implies a responsibility that does not exist.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:16:39

We are NOT the largest economy on earth.

That would be the Eurozone, by FAR.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 14:21:43

I didn’t mean to suggest the Republicans are somehow being irresponsible by not responding. I merely was noting they are missing an opportunity to define themselves differently than the incumbent. It is certainly their prerogative to waste opportunities if they see fit to do so.

 
Comment by CharlieTango
2012-05-03 15:00:32

We are NOT the largest economy on earth.

That would be the Eurozone, by FAR.

The Eurozone is proving to be a collection of disparate economies.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 15:47:58

“…disparate economies.”

More like “desperate”…

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-03 19:17:05

Republican budgets

These are the guys who start wars but keep them off the books, right?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 06:42:17

It is difficult to argue with something that makes no sense.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 06:15:12

Corporation$ Inc., don’t need no stinkin’ Gov’t regulation, on account$ of theys “ProFEE$$ional$” & “Ethical$” & good ol’ “Bidne$$Folk$” :-)

” …But those fee$ have more than doubled in recent months, reaching the 24 cent average like all other shops, Duncan said. So retailers selling 99-cent cups of coffee may now be paying almost a quarter in fee$ on a sale.

Card companies “followed the rule but not the spirit of what the Fed said,” Duncan said.” ;-)

heheeheeheeheeeheee :-/

Bank$ slash retailers’ debit card fee$:
By Jose Pagliery @ CNNMoney May 3, 2012

End of FDIC program may hurt small firm lending

It’s still unclear whether the savings from lower fees are being passed on to consumers. It’s even unknown whether most shops have seen the savings themselves.

Some have fallen victim to a legal loophole, according to Robert Day, managing partner of Merchant Relief Council, a Tustin, Calif., group which seeks to protect retailer profits.

His explanation involves credit card processing companies, which fill middleman roles between shops and banks.

“Debit card companies had to lower fees to processors, but there’s no rule that says the processors have to pass that on to the merchants,” he said. “They’re pocketing that savings for themselves.”

According to the Fed report, Visa and MasterCard are charging shops 24 cents on average, while Discover’s rate is lower, at 17 cents. A dozen smaller companies fall into a similar range.

It’s a sharp fall from what the big three were charging in 2009, when the average was 55 cents for each transaction.

Today, the cap is set at 21 cents, plus a percent of the sale amount.

In the age of plastic, the total amount buyers put on debit cards has grown. In 2009, $1.4 trillion was spent in 37.6 billion debit card transactions. Last year, $1.8 trillion was spent in 46.7 billion transactions.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 07:30:25

People need to go back to cash before they decide to do away with it altogether.

And don’t think for one second they won’t if they can get away with. Who would pass up a chance to make money by charging people to use their own money?

What a scam!

Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 08:00:44

It was not too long ago that shops had little signs that said “$20 minimum for credit card purchases.” Only in the past 6-7 years have credit card companies made headway into the under-$25 transactions. It took a lot of incentive for merchants and a huge marketing push to train the consumers, but notice how those little signs went away?

But if debits and credit cards become greedy and merchants have to pay a 24¢ fee to sell a $1 cup of coffee, those signs will come back.

Comment by polly
2012-05-03 08:14:38

Credit card companies changed their contracts. If the merchants don’t take the credit cards for all transactions (no matter how small), they can’t take the cards at all. The signs aren’t going to come back unless some state invalidates the contracts with legislation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 08:17:57

Oh, and even then, I don’t think the signs would come back. There has been a lot of rearch done that people spend more when they use their cards (throw an extra something in the cart because they don’t have to worry about having enough cash or needing to go to the bank to get more). That alone would probably keep the merchants accepting cards for all transactions, just to keep the people who prefer using cards coming to their store. And with the tech set ups (and cashiers who can’t count change) it can be faster to process a card transaction than a cash one anyway.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 14:49:36

There has been a lot of rearch done that people spend more when they use their cards

We’ve gone all cash these last few months (except for an occasional online purchase that requires a CC) and we are spending WAY less money.

 
 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:18:28

…and there you have it.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:22:22

I’ve known or met a couple of fellows over the years who worked at F&F. They were long gone before the current wave of departures.

ECONOMY
Updated April 30, 2012, 10:53 p.m. ET

Freddie, Fannie Departures Escalate
By NICK TIMIRAOS

Concerns are growing about departures at mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a situation that some executives argue is making it difficult to manage the companies and their $5 trillion mortgage business.

Freddie Mac has found it harder to retain employees amid reduced compensation and public complaints, such as a protest in Los Angeles in February.

The latest sign came Monday when Freddie said that Anthony Renzi—the executive who oversees the single-family mortgage business, by far the company’s largest and most complex division—would leave this month to take another job in the industry.

Mr. Renzi, who has spent two years at Freddie, joins a growing list of industry veterans who have departed over the past year. The chief executives of both Fannie and Freddie have said they plan to leave this year. In the past two years, dozens of senior managers, many with long tenures, have left.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2012-05-03 07:05:35

“Reduced compensation.” It’s my understanding that F & F employees have a pay scale that’s different (higher) than the regular government GS pay scale, and they are being moved into the GS system.

So where are they going? Maybe some of them are close enough to retirement age to just drop out, but certainly not all of them are in that situation.

Comment by polly
2012-05-03 08:02:15

Heads of agencies and certain senior managers aren’t paid in the GS scale. They are under Senior Executive Service. But even they have to make less than Congress and the Congress critters haven’t been giving themselves raises. Then, of course, the highest GS levels have to make less than the SES people, so they are sometimes denied any increase it looks like they should get on the pay scale to make sure they are paid less than SES who are getting paid less than Congress.

At least that is what I was told the last time anyone explained it.

F&F must have been on an entirely different system. Their CEOs got millions. There is plenty of room for their pay to go down without getting them anywhere near GS levels of comp.

Hmm…Fannie is right down the street from me. It would be really easy commute…

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:25:49

Adam Levin
Say Something Already! Obama and Romney’s Housing Crisis
Posted: 04/27/2012 3:04 pm

President Obama, Governor Romney and their backers may be spending hundreds of millions of dollars to live in the most expensive and exclusive house in the nation, but they aren’t saying enough about the fact that housing in America is broken. Despite what the media and candidates might have you believe, real estate, home ownership and mortgages are the most important issues of the coming presidential election. No one, however, is really talking about how it broke, who is responsible or what should be done with them. Worst of all, they’re not talking about how to fix it. Really fix it.

Across this nation there is marked frustration with the persistent and toxic residue of the Great Recession. Some 12 million Americans find themselves $700 billion under water — their homes threatened by foreclosure. There is a general sense that the $26 billion settlement by which the five major mortgage-servicing banks escaped further liability on some issues was more a victory for the banks than it was for the government or the public. And, just last week another settlement in a class-action suit against Bank of America was challenged, after its $20 million award was agreed to by the lawyers in New York.

That litigation was brought by pension funds seeking redress for nondisclosure of Merrill Lynch’s disastrous financial condition at the time that it was purchased by B of A — a condition that resulted from Merrill’s real estate and mortgage investments. Lawyers in a collateral case that would be extinguished by such a settlement raised several objections — two of which revolved around charges of collusion, and the fact that the New York settlement involved no payment by individuals.

Those plaintiffs are frustrated — like everyone else. There’s a general feeling that people who should be on opposite sides of a barbed wire fence are actually winking and nodding at each other. With all the lawsuits and settlements that have already occurred, and are ongoing at this moment, there are precious few individuals who have been called to account by a civil court, and virtually no one has been prosecuted criminally. Instead, for the most part there have been a number of settlements and fines paid by institutions rather than individuals. Those payments have generally been infinitesimal in comparison to the magnitude of the collapse, have had very little effect on the problem itself, and in most cases were made by financial institutions that benefited directly or indirectly from the taxpayer bailouts of 2008 and 2009.

In other words, everyone can hear the piper but only the taxpayers are paying him. It sure seems like the bad guys are slithering away yet again.

And that’s the real issue. It seems like the people who looted our nation and took away the American dream are getting away with it. And we all know it… including the presidential candidates. It’s the elephant in the room. OK, it’s the donkey in the room, too.

Comment by WT Economist
2012-05-03 06:42:20

“With all the lawsuits and settlements that have already occurred, and are ongoing at this moment, there are precious few individuals who have been called to account by a civil court, and virtually no one has been prosecuted criminally. Instead, for the most part there have been a number of settlements and fines paid by institutions rather than individuals.”

What would it cost our broke government to throw everyone who committed some act of fraud in the housing bubble in jail, or even put them on trial?

A public shaming may be more cost effective. But then everyone is seeking votes, campaign contributions or both from those who deserve to be shamed.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 06:34:13

Occupy’s image blown to smithereens
The Plain Dealer | May 3, 2012 | Kevin O’Brien

What a lucky, lucky week this has been for Greater Cleveland — especially for whichever unsuspecting souls were driving across the Ohio 82 bridge across the Cuyahoga Valley while five petty criminals associated with Occupy Cleveland were trying to community organize it.

The Occupiers, authorities tell us, thought they had rigged the span with plastic explosives that would detonate when they punched a code into a cellphone.

The only thing that went up in smoke, though, was their plot. They were working with dummy devices — fitting — sold to them by an FBI informant whom they failed to recognize as the Man.

I’m sorry. Your call to anarchist glory cannot be completed as dialed. Please check the number and dial again. And again. And again.

General Electric was lucky, too. Its lighting plant was to have been the site of an Occupy Cleveland protest about taxbreakssinglepayerAfghanistanenvironmentaldestructioncorporategreedCitizensUnitedjobtrainingstudentloandebtgayrightsdefensespendingteacherpayimmigrationpolicyChinesecurrencyshenanigansIraqGlassSteagallforeclosures.

Once the alleged bomb plotters’ arrest became public, the unions and leftist organizations that were going to bring the party favors to the GE May Day demo backed out. In Cleveland, rigging public bridges for destruction is still considered bad form.

Comment by combotechie
2012-05-03 06:48:25

Supposidly these guys are pissed at the One-Percenters so they - what? - they go after people who are trying to cross a bridge?

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 07:57:31

“associated with Occupy Cleveland” is enough of a link to discredit any and all discussion of wealth inequality in this country. That is the meme the 1%er pigmen and their corporate media fluffers want you to believe…

Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-03 08:10:26

Exactly. Funny how the most cynical posters suddenly become wide-eyed believers in the MSM’s every word, when the issue suits them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 08:42:48

Supposidly these guys are pissed at the One-Percenters so they - what? - they go after people who are trying to cross a bridge?

Two points:

1. Anarchists are very much a part of the OWS movement… if you think otherwise, then you are aren’t seeing clearly.

2. Project Mayhem, aka Fight Club, was all about the destruction of the financial system to bring about the collapse of modern society and return life to a simpler, more “equal” time. It wouldn’t surprise me if this movie served as the “Anarchist’s cookbook” of our time…

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 09:16:51

“2. Project Mayhem, aka Fight Club, was all about the destruction of the financial system to bring about the collapse of modern society” ;-)

Goggle:

“Wall $t. blames rat chewing through cable for late $tock Market di$ruptions yesterday”

[Really, that's what "they" said happened.]

Somebody lost monie$, somebody made monie$, … now stay focu$ed:

“Linda-the-Lunch-Lady-Live$-Lavi$hly!”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 10:07:00

There was a rat all right, but it had two legs,not four…

I got this rat, this gnawing, cheese eating effin’ rat and it brings up questions…

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 09:28:30

The bridge is located in Brecksville, which according to city data dot com has a median household income of $82,124, as compared to statewide median of $45,395. This is where the pigmen live, $82K is a lot of money in Ohio.

While there likely would have been some collateral damage, there is the probability that a few PIGS would have gone down with the bridge. Maybe not truly 1%er pigmen, but top 2-5%er pigmen who are the 1%ers’ house slaves and fluffers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Steve J
2012-05-03 13:25:03

Anarchists do not join movements.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 14:53:22

Right? I was LMAO when I read that.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 16:35:33

Anarchists do not join movements.

Are you really that naive? Political movements are co-opted all the time. Do you honestly think the Anti-globalist movement isn’t full of anarchists? Do you think the riots, attacks, and general mayhem at every WTO meeting are performed by peaceful protesters just trying to get their message across?

 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 07:14:00

If only they were teabaggers they would have had some TARP cash to successfully complete their plot:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-30/tea-party-congressmen-accept-cash-from-bailed-out-bankers.html

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-03 08:01:37

They were NOT associated with Occupy. This is an outright lie and straight ahead psycho warfare propaganda.

Just like when Sony blamed Anonymous when their game network got hacked… 3 times.

Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2012-05-04 07:24:17

I’m pretty sure George Holtz inspired members of Anonymous to take down certain parts of sony like the login servers. Whether they swiped the credit card data remains to be seen.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 08:05:03

They called themselves “Occupy” and that they were going to “community organize” the bridge? They should have gone for the trifecta and ask for the FBI informant’s birth certificate.

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 09:14:11

And if they did there would be a Breibart story linked as the top Drudge Report headline about it!

 
 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 08:35:31

sold to them by an FBI informant whom they failed to recognize as the Man.

Apparently (according to many eyewitnesses) when a splinter group of the Occupy May 1st march smashed windows and cars in SF’s Mission District the police practically escorted the looters down the street.

No arrests. Not a one. Hmmmm.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-03 09:10:57

The Kochtopus does like to add its astroturf to grass roots movements.

You tell yourself ‘no, they’d never go so far’, but then you look at what Murdoch was up to in Britain- wiretapping the whole country, a little b&e when needed, bribing cops, etc.

These guys are a bit crazy.

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-05-03 08:48:55

Right, butt,
And Baptists blew up the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma.

Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 09:13:29

According to Clinton - it was right wing talk radio

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-03 09:34:29

Timothy McVeigh was a teabagger before there was a tea party, he should be considered as one of the movement’s intellectual founders :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:39:40

How are prospects looking for QE3, given the ever-improving labor market situation against the backdrop of ultra-low U.S. interest rates?

FPSS: I am going to mock you if QE3 doesn’t come to pass.

May 3, 2012, 8:36 a.m. EDT
U.S. jobless claims drop 27,000 to 365,000
Applications for benefits decline for first time in one month
By Jeffry Bartash, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The number of people who applied for jobless benefits fell last week for the first time in a month to just slightly above a four-year low, according to the latest government data.

Jobless claims declined by 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 365,000 in the week ended April 28, the U.S. Labor Department said Thursday. Claims from two weeks ago were revised up to 392,000 from an original reading of 388,000.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 06:41:45

From the MarketWatch dot com home page:

STOCKS AND SECTORS
U.S. stock futures extend gains after data

Story Not Found

The story you requested could not be found.

To find what you’re looking for, try one of these options:

MarketWatch Front Page
A starting place for all your financial news and information needs.

Search
Search MarketWatch news, past and present.

Quotes
Get quotes for stocks, mutual funds, options and major market indexes.

If you reached this page by clicking a link on the MarketWatch site, please report it to MarketWatch Feedback.

 
Comment by measton
2012-05-03 08:25:15

I saw an interview on Colbert last night and the guy was saying that OWS was looking into starting their own bank that would be run more like a credit union, ie those with money in the system would be the owners.

Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 08:35:51

Is this an example of “if you can’t beat them, join them”?

While too big to fail banks is part of the problem, it doesn’t address the fact that the entire financial system is set up to benefit those who primarily earn money through “capital gains”, not earned income.

Creating a new credit union does nothing to address this, as there are plenty of small banks and local credit unions already available.

Comment by b-hamster
2012-05-03 09:29:12

From what I’ve heard in the Occupy citrcles, the interest was in creating state banks - I believe ND has a state bank.

Credit Unions are heavily regulated, I believe, and do not have the same lending ability that private and national banks have.

I recall reading about the benfits of state banks, versus national banks, and the reasoning sounded compelling (such as publicly owned).

Link for Washington state-onwed bank:
http://www.nwprogressive.org/weblog/2010/02/hasegawa-proposes-state-owned-bank-of.html

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-05-03 08:39:53

The mutual fund companies ought to do that. Oh wait…Vanguard already is investor-owned. SAIac too.

Comment by WT Economist
2012-05-03 10:34:45

No sustitute for values, as the Liberty Mutual example from yesterday showed.

But yes, we need new banks. They just need to prove they can prevent customer funds from getting stolen by hackers. That’s the biggest deal in banking right now.

 
 
 
Comment by Michael Viking
2012-05-03 08:31:49

This just in from my dental hygienist: “I can’t wait for home prices to start rising!”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:20:15

I hope you bit down on said person’s finger.

 
 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 08:43:21

OK I’m calling uncle. I guess we wait it out another 6 months, 1 year, forever.

Just found out that a house we put an offer in on Monday went to an all cash, no contingency offer. This would be the third time this exact same thing has happened in as many months.

Here’s the house: http://www.trulia.com/property/3082367070-236-University-St-San-Francisco-CA-94134

List 599K, we offered 617K.

Agent said there were 25 offers, and judging by the traffic at open houses, I don’t doubt it.

Oil City would be Plan B, but we have jobs here.

Comment by Salinasron
2012-05-03 09:00:32

wow, unbelievable that the game goes on! As long as the cash flows there seems no one wants to know where the money comes from. Also says nothing about where the neighbourhood is headed, family or rental. I hope things change and you will find something. They can’t keep the game going forever but even two more years will seem like forever.

Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 09:11:58

They can’t keep the game going forever but even two more years will seem like forever.

This neighborhood is not Pac Heights, not even close.

From looking at the comps, it appears that we are about 6 months late to this party.

But anyway, thanks to HBB (and a shout out to patrick.net), we do have a plan B, and it involves buying a way smaller, way cheaper house.

My partner really liked this house and really wants a bigger house, but in a way I am relieved. It would have been a stretch and I would have had to go back to work full-time.

I would be happy with a small 2 bedroom (950 sq. ft. or so) and a smaller mortgage and the ability to take a surfing vacation to socal or Hawaii at least once a year.

You guys have all made me (rightfully) scared of taking on a big mortgage, and while we are waiting we are saving up beaucoup bucks.

You save a lot of money switching from Peet’s coffee to Costco brand.

Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 09:18:46

Good luck. SF is one whacky market.

Eventually - the housing bust is going to get there. And a few other places like NYC, New Jersey, upstate NY and nearly ALL of Canada.

In the meantime - rent the best you can and enjoy life

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AV0CAD0
2012-05-03 10:08:23

Is SF getting Chinese speculators like Vancouver?

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 11:10:11

Is SF getting Chinese speculators like Vancouver?

Y-E-S

Crazy big time

 
Comment by avocado
2012-05-03 13:56:23

China: Why invade us? Just buy us with all the money we spent on cr@p.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 11:44:17

I don’t understand that house at all.

$617K is what, 8-9 times your combined income? I thought you would be competing with that $90K down payment money. I certainly wasn’t expecting people to have over $600K in cash for… a house I don’t understand.

Good luck SF renter; in your situation I would have no idea what to do.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 12:08:07

Renter, is the ratio that high? You don’t seem like the type.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:30:22

I thought you would be competing with that $90K down payment money. I certainly wasn’t expecting people to have over $600K in cash for… a house I don’t understand.

120K down payment is no match for all cash.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:34:38

Renter, is the ratio that high? You don’t seem like the type.

Rents for a 2-3 bedroom SFH are well over 3K month.

A 600K house with 120 down puts us on par with what we are paying in rent. which is what we have been waiting for.

We have considered leaving the area, but with our combined seniority in the school district (and looming education cuts everywhere), 2 kids in school, and a strong community of friends, well…

…we are between a rock and a hard place.

We will just keep shelling out the rent and hope that this is a temporary spring insanity.

Inventory in SF is down 45% YOY.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:35:43

Rents for a 2-3 bedroom SFH are well over 3K month.

It was the Dec 24th $200 a month rental increase (and the fall sales comps) that got us into looking to buy in the first place.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 13:35:46

I think they listed their income, but I don’t remember where. Teachers at San Fran schools, and one is part time. What kind of income would that be? $150K? Hmm, so that would be closer to 4x, and would be 3x if both worked full-time.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:39:54

What kind of income would that be? $150K?

130K when I go back full-time.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 14:02:46

I certainly wasn’t expecting people to have over $600K in cash for… a house I don’t understand.

Second house in that neighborhood that we were outbid by all cash and higher offer.

Here’s the first one. http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Francisco/539-Holyoke-St-94134/home/1430916

It was listed for 499K in January. Sold for 588 all cash. WTF.

 
Comment by Muggy
2012-05-03 14:37:40

Wait, you make 130K/yr. teaching? What level/subject?

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 16:03:21

There are two of them and they are pushing 50.

 
Comment by Muggy
2012-05-03 16:21:38

Got it, sorry — speed reading.

 
 
Comment by Dale
2012-05-03 11:54:40

“…while we are waiting we are saving up beaucoup bucks.”

Use it to fund your retirement. That is what we have been doing. Funny how fast it creeps up on you when you are not expecting it. There is some solace for not having a house in seeing the retirement fund go up, up, up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:38:49

Use it to fund your retirement

Inflation + high rent make it hard to save, but we are on a roll so a-saving we go. 1% interest woohoo!!!

After 30 years of renting I was hoping for the opportunity for a fixed monthly cost on housing. When I first moved here is was paying $425 for a 1 bedroom garden apartment in the Mission.

Now, 2 kids later 3K for a 3 bedroom. No rent control on SFHs here.

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 21:57:47

After 30 years of renting I was hoping for the opportunity for a fixed monthly cost on housing. When I first moved here is was paying $425 for a 1 bedroom garden apartment in the Mission.

You need to wait for 50-million boomers to die-off before SF becomes available. In the mean time rent, and enjoy the mobility option.

 
 
Comment by drumminj
2012-05-03 14:40:52

You save a lot of money switching from Peet’s coffee to Costco brand.

The Trader Joe’s coffee is really good, too. Not as cheap as Costco, though, but tastier IMO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-03 10:16:45

I drove through SF yesterday on the 101. I didn’t see any For Sale signs.

I hope they never get a really heavy rain there, the way the bubble row houses are stacked up the hill sides to the south of town!

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-05-03 11:19:03

And I just met with an appraiser on the house I bought a year ago (drop the 30-year rate by nearly 1%, why not?).

He said that while they have no problem appraising for more than I paid, they are still characterizing the Bay Area market as “flat to declining”.

 
Comment by cactus
2012-05-03 12:23:53

that is too expensive

costal living is tough I have to find another rental because the landlord wants to move into the house I currently rent

big pain

Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:42:53

costal living is tough I have to find another rental because the landlord wants to move into the house I currently rent

That has happened to us 2X already. Just when you get all settled and comfy in a nice rental, oops, time to go.

I am not interested in dealing with that again, and especially not when I am old. I really do not want to be a permarenter.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-05-03 13:16:47

I like it SF…..a full first floor for 2 cars and an open space to build a family room or serious office..or heck a video photography studio..home business

Alt side thursday 12-3 pm, you can park another car in front of your garage…they do it here its legal to park in front of your own garage on the street…..nice concrete yard for a pool plus some real dirt on the back

But the got dammm price ………..

Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-03 13:45:19

I like it SF…..a full first floor for 2 cars and an open space to build a family room or serious office..or heck a video photography studio..home business

Home business it is. Or was going to be.

The real deal is we are presently running a side business/home business surrepticiously out of our rental. Can’t expand any more (because we are renters).

Won’t go into details, but no worries, it’s not meth…or illegal in any way

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 14:19:01

“This would be the third time this exact same thing has happened in as many months.”

Is there any evidence on where these all-cash offers originate (e.g. U.S., China or elsewhere)?

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 21:50:35

List 599K, we offered 617K.

$617k? Speechless.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:23:07

Free “house for sale” advertising from southern Arizona’s leading fishwrap:

Nat’l Building Museum spotlights Tucson home

The money quote:

“The house features a swimming pool and outside living area carved into a cliff face and a kitchen cantilevered over the downhill slope of the house’s 3.5 acres of desert property. The exterior is clad in heavy-gauge steel, with the lower level formed from cast-in-place concrete.

“The house, at 6620 N. Eagle Ridge, is now for sale, listed at $5.2 million, according to the website of Robin Sue Kaiserman, the Long Realty real estate agent representing the sellers.”

To which I say:

Robin Sue does a lot of listings like this. She’s one of those agents who seldom stoops to list anything within the Tucson city limits. We’re just not uppah crust enough for her.

Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 11:59:41

Oooh, that exhibit is actually worth going downtown to see. Even with the lousy Metro.

Comment by polly
2012-05-03 12:11:53

The Ntional Building Museum is awsome. The central space is incredible. See if they still have the Lego exhibit up. They extended it several times.

Also, best gift shop in DC.

Comment by oxide
2012-05-03 13:41:25

I didn’t check on the Lego exhibit. It’s one the few pay exhibits they had. My favorite was still the eco-friendly house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-03 16:08:33

Oh, but that one was totally worth a few bucks to see. I’m spoiled because so much is free around here, but I’ll pay for something like that. Says it is $8 now. I thought I only paid $5…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 09:25:42

The MegaIndu$trialMedicalComplexInc.$ [+ the Billing $y$tem]

Their ProFee$$ional / Ethical$ / and their main concern is every $ingle one of yer health i$$ue$! :-)

The $urprising $ecret Behind Doctor Referral$
A little-known profe$$ion that just might influence which doctor you see next.:
SMARTMONEY MAGAZINE / MAY 2, 2012

All good news for McKenzie — because even though she is nursing a lingering cold, that’s not what brings the 32-year-old University of Alabama grad, stylishly turned out in a black dress and triple strand of pearls, to the small town of Bay Minette (population: 8,500). She’s making the trek as a principal of AdvisorsMD, one of a small but growing number of health care consultancies around the country that promise to help specialist physicians reel in more referrals by marketing their services to fellow doctors.

In this business, it’s all about pitching one doctor to another — often without one having seen the other in action, or face-to-face. On this morning, McKenzie is promoting two clients: a 20-doctor orthopedic group trying to fend off a nearby competitor and a solo urogynecologist who handles pelvic and bladder issues. But she knows she has only a few minutes to get through her pitch, a spiel that touches on a host of body parts, from arthritic hands and hips (”We’ve got some top surgeons”) to leaky bladders (”Do you get many older patients complaining of incontinence?”). Not an expert on medicine herself, McKenzie has brought along some show-and-tell, including a glossy flier that looks like a yearbook page for the lab-coat set, complete with 20 smiling head shots of doctors posing with diplomas or spinal vertebrae models.

The internist, with patients waiting outside, nods absently. There is no discussion about the physicians’ credentials or experience. (McKenzie later says she has met this doctor before and that clinical quality of AdvisorsMD’s clients is assumed.) She doesn’t describe the nonsurgical treatments the bladder guy offers, nor how the orthopedists handle pain management. But wait times are a different matter; McKenzie excitedly describes a referral hotline that guarantees appointments within 24 hours. A business card, with an X-ray of a skeletal hand holding a phone, completes the pitch. “This is good for the girls at the front desk to keep handy,” she says.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:48:34

Out here in the small biz/freelance world, referrals are worshipped. I mean, if you’re not getting referrals, well, what is wrong with you?

Part of the problem may be that you have clients who like to think of you as their “best kept secret.” They don’t want to share you with others, especially the competition.

Or you may be dealing with people who just don’t offer referrals, even if you ask them pretty-please. I’ve had this experience with academics.

The way around this is to contact others who the happy client may know. If you have the happy client’s permission, go ahead and drop his or her name.

The most troubling about the above scenario is that there are kickbacks taking place behind the scene. And you can imagine how that goes over with patients. Yeah, I know. They’re not kickbacks. They’re referral fees. Or commissions. Or something like that. (Feel better?)

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 10:43:29

“Yeah, I know. They’re not kickback$. They’re referral fee$. Or commission$. Or $omething like that.”

What’s the most current billing co$t for a “name-brand” Q-Tip? Tongue depre$$or? Building crane for the new Ho$pital out-patient wing? ;-/

 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 09:38:49

“More profit$”, less workers! … in America.

& if you gift us a “Tax Amnesty”, we’ll bring our Profit$ back to the U$A & hire more workers, really!, honest!, we truly mean it this time! :-)

[It's a beautiful MegaCorporation Inc. "Financial Innovation".]

America’s Jobs Crisis
The 86 million invisible unemployed:
By Annalyn Censky @ CNNMoney May 3, 2012

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — There are far more jobless people in the United States than you might think.

While it’s true that the unemployment rate is falling, that doesn’t include the millions of nonworking adults who aren’t even looking for a job anymore. And hiring isn’t strong enough to keep up with population growth.

As a result, the labor force is now at its smallest size since the 1980s when compared to the broader working age population.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 09:44:19

I thought that the woman who did “bartering” was interesting. What was also interesting was that there wasn’t any mention of foodstamps or other “welfare” assistance by the long term unemployed.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 09:51:07

I’m getting more requests for bartering than I used to.

I usually tell the barter wannabes that I have an estimated tax payment coming up, and I can’t pay the feds with barter. Those guys want m-o-n-e-y. Likewise, the utility companies. They’re funny that way too.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-05-03 13:38:41

Almost Hwy….you SPEND the money in America on American workers creating American jobs No H1b or visas, no stock buybacks or mergers no executive pay raises unless the janitor and secretaries get the same percentage…..and then all the money you SPENT in America will not be subject to the 35% tax……

if you gift us a “Tax Amnesty”, we’ll bring our Profit$ back to the U$A & hire more workers, really!, honest!, we truly mean it this time

Comment by polly
2012-05-03 16:14:20

That is already in the tax code. Business expenses are deductible (though some capital expenses are amortized over several years, usually far less than the useful life of the item purchased). Do you seriously no know this, dj? They don’t have to spend in the US to get this deduction on their US income; they are already taking it.

Comment by aNYCdj
2012-05-04 05:03:46

Polly then why is Apple and other companies complaining about the tax?

Oh they don’t want to spend it on Americans ? They want to spend it on stock buybacks and mergers? Which will put people out of work in the combined companies?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 10:19:09

Iffin’ Oct-O-Mom had thought of this she’d had x14 different Gun Manufactures + the NRA to $upplement / Enhance her “Financial $it-U-A-$hun”

[Eyes had to create a new archive folder for articles like this one: “Breaking news in America & around the Globe!!!!!” :-/

Levi Johnston to Name Baby Daughter After a Gun:
By Russell Goldman | ABC OTUS News – 19 hrs ago

Alaskan baby daddy Levi Johnston, former fiancé of Bristol Palin and father of their child, has another baby on the way and plans to name her after his favorite pistol.

Johnston said he and girlfriend Sunny Oglesby would name their baby “Breeze Beretta,” after the Italian handgun.

Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-03 10:43:57

Johnston said he and girlfriend Sunny Oglesby would name their baby “Breeze Beretta,” after the Italian handgun.

Lol. Not that we plan on having any more children, but I guess if we did we could name him/her Kalashnikov Savage Smith-Wesson… kind of rolls off the tongue, and it works for a boy or girl. :)

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 15:59:48

“and it works for a boy or girl.”

“You brings the bait & eye’lls bring the pole”

Boy, is that a throw back or what? ;-)

 
 
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 21:43:37

Johnston said he and girlfriend Sunny Oglesby would name their baby “Breeze Beretta,” after the Italian handgun.

I was on the road today, and I stopped for lunch at a fast food outlet. While there I watched a young couple with a toddler in the parking lot climbing down, yup…climbing, from a totally jacked-up full sized late model diesel SUV with huge lugged tires and polished wheels. It’s no surprise to me when I read about the escalating cost of “well-baby” services doled out to young peeps who apparently can’t afford their care. “We’re all in this together.” Um, okay, whatever.

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-03 10:41:33

I see that once again, a society is tending towards allowing a small handful of people to control the distribution of vast amounts of wealth.

Historically, we had kings/dictators. Then we moved to more representative democracies and republics. Then highly successful business people wound up forming de facto oligarchies (the Citigroup plutonomy memo anyone? Robber barons?). Then with communism, there are small groups of government apparatchiks who wind up controlling and distributing vast amounts of wealth. The same holds true with socialism.

Now, I see The Bernank doing the same thing with his vast money printing and bond-buying programs. This state of affairs seems to be what human societies tend towards. And it is something we should guard against, this concentration of wealth and wealth-distribution powers.

Failing that, who do I see to supplicate The Bernank and key politicians in order to receive some of that largesse? :)

 
Comment by 2banana
2012-05-03 12:43:15

The same media that tell us Elizabeth Warren is Native American but George Zimmerman is white…

Astounding that this election is even close. But that says a lot. Even for the “Kennedy Seat” in one of the most liberal states in the union.

—————————–

Warren: I used minority listing to share heritage
Boston Herald | 5/3/12 | Chabot

Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, fending off questions about whether she used her Native American heritage to advance her career, said today she enrolled herself as a minority in law school directories for nearly a decade because she hoped to meet other people with tribal roots.

The Harvard Law professor argued she didn’t use her minority status to get her teaching jobs, and slammed her Republican rival U.S. Sen.Scott Brown for suggesting otherwise.

Warren is looking to shake off the story of her Native American background, which has hounded her since the Herald first reported that Harvard Law School has touted Warren as a minority hire. She also listed herself as a minority in a law school directory for nine years between 1986 and 1995.

Warren’s statements come as genealogists at the New England Historic Genealogical Society were unable to back up earlier accounts that her great great great grandmother is Cherokee.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 13:07:51

With due respect to Ben’s discretion over what to let through the filter, what does this Republican political witch hunt discussion item have to do with the HBB? Doesn’t the RNC run a blog where such items are more appropriate?

Comment by Muggy
2012-05-03 13:15:07

C’mon bear, a little latitude is alright for the regulars.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 14:16:03

He demands a lot of latitude for his personal political agenda, which is aired here constantly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Steve J
2012-05-03 13:31:41

She has as much Indian blood as Bill Baker the Chief of the Cherokee Nation (1/32).

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 15:26:31

(1/32) :-)

OK, being a geneticist let’s start the proverbial [chestnut] balls rolling:

1/32.0000000000000000000000000031416

Rule #1:
No rounding over time!

Someone please verify!:

http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/digits.html

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-03 13:37:56

“The same media that tell us Elizabeth Warren is Native American but George Zimmerman is white…”

FWIW, it’s the tribes who define how much “blood” is required to be a tribe member. It has nothing to do with the media.

And by the way, banana boy, you can be “white” and “hispanic”. I know I am. Tune in to a Univision soap opera. They are chock full of “white” people.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 14:51:16

You can also be black and Hispanic.

Case in point: My former housemate, the brother of Pittsburgh Pirates star Rennie Stennett. That family’s first language was Spanish.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-03 15:49:48

“We’re all related” ;-)

Ya forgot to mention the small details called:

1. The $pinning Planet$.
2. The ca$t $unlight, 8.34 minute$ hence.

But why worry?, GOLDenman$uck$ is doing God’$ work, and that’s a direct quote, Google it iffin’ you plea$e! ;-)

Comment by Muggy
2012-05-03 16:07:37
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-05-03 13:17:47

http://www.realestateconsulting.com/content/SBMI-201205

Good graphical description of the market data. Burns’ opinions are his opinions.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 15:43:16

Johns Burns The Used House Pimp.

Go burn John before “Realtor John” burns you.

Housing prices are cratering. Why buy now when you can buy later after prices crater?

 
 
Comment by cactus
2012-05-03 14:04:09

and why will this make housing go up in price ?

‘The number of workers receiving SSDI jumped 22 percent to 8.7 million in April from 7.1 million in December 2007, Social Security data show. That helps explain as much as one quarter of the decline in the U.S. labor-force participation rate during the period, according to economists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley.

Expiring Benefits
The participation rate — the share of working-age people holding a job or seeking one — was 63.8 percent in March after falling to a three-decade low of 63.7 percent in January. Disability recipients may account for as much as 0.5 percentage point of the more than 2 point drop since the end of 2007, the economists calculate, and that contribution could grow when some extended unemployment benefits expire at the end of this year.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 15:45:35

“Housing Prices Are FALLING In Silicon Valley”

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/04/24/businessinsiderbelieve-it-or-not-ho.DTL

Don’t believe reaItor lies about housing. Prices are falling even in Silicon Valley.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 15:49:50

Just for shits and giggles, the engineering and construction biz appears to be growing at a pretty good rate in the Ohio area. Weird huh? New hires, new designs in the pipeline, etc.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-03 16:00:39

Indeed it is. I know someone who owns a construction company in Ohio. He’s doing quite well, TYVM.

Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:17:35

Yeah this isn’t just a one time blip on the radar. It seems every few months they hire more people since about 2009.

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2012-05-03 15:55:28

Well, well, well… what do we have here.

Crackhead Corporate welfare mama daddy.

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120503/BUSINESS/305030034/Scott-Congel-Medley-Centre-Irondequoit?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Home&nclick_check=1

Tell Congel to pull himself up by his designer boot straps.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2012-05-03 16:54:16

I think he should sell one or two of this megadigs. I heard he put the gates up this week on his latest beast that all the neighbors are up in arms about because he drained a local pond that used to be their water frontage. I also recently heard on the gossip lines his son now lives in the old McMansion around the street.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:45:15

“NJ Realtor Charged With Fraud”
(imagine that)

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/04/real_estate_agent_charged_with.html

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:46:59
Comment by rms
2012-05-03 21:25:27

In court Tuesday, a prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney’s office accused the Elegados and their associates of targeting low-income families and helping them falsify documents so those families could qualify for loans.

Nobody could have seen it coming; I’m shocked!

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:48:26

“NY Realtor Charged With Theft”
(nahhh…. it can’t be!)

http://www.wgrz.com/news/article/153718/13/Williamsville-Real-Estate-Agent-Charge-With-Stealing-

 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2012-05-03 16:49:58

“CA Realtor Charged With Embezzlement, Forgery And Theft”
(typical of a realtor)

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_19939009

 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-03 17:05:14

These links to realtor criminality should be a warning to you all.

Comment by Muggy
2012-05-03 19:25:30

Realtors are jibronies.

 
 
Comment by avocado
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-03 23:33:13

Treasury may seek a post-Fannie Mae safety net
By Cheyenne Hopkins, Clea Benson and Ian Katz
Bloomberg News
April 19, 2012
Jonathan Ernst/Bloomberg News

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said Treasury may offer a plan for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in coming weeks.

WASHINGTON - Treasury officials are leaning toward recommending that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac be replaced with a government safety net for the mortgage finance system and continued federal backing for loans to lower-income homebuyers, said three people briefed on the discussions.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said that a recommendation for winding down the two taxpayer-owned mortgage companies could be released in coming weeks.

In timing its proposal, Treasury must balance political and economic realities. Presidential campaign politics and deep divisions between Democrats and Republicans make it unlikely that mortgage-finance overhaul will be enacted this year.

Yet the lack of a clear blueprint is contributing to continued weakness in the housing market, said Karen Dynan, a former economist with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

“The uncertainty surrounding the future of the mortgage finance system has impeded the rebound of the housing market and the private housing-finance market,’’ said Dynan, now a vice president at the Brookings Institution. “It’s just really hard for the players to make decisions when you don’t know what the rules are going to be in the future.’’

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post