May 4, 2012

Bits Bucket for May 4, 2012

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

188 Comments »

Comment by The UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-05-04 02:45:19

Florida carries burden of 30 percent of nation’s shadow inventory
by Kim Miller
The Sunshine State’s shadow inventory of 550,000 homes makes up a third of the nation’s unlisted distressed properties according to a report released this week by the Florida Realtors.

Florida Realtors chief economist John Tuccillo said despite the large volume, the slow leak of homes onto the market, as well as an increase in short sales, shouldn’t crash prices as many have feared.

The report, released Tuesday, defines shadow inventory as homes with mortgages 90 days or more delinquent, homes in the process of foreclosure and homes repossessed by the bank but not yet listed for sale.

Tuccillo said this is the first statewide analysis of the shadow inventory and its potential impact on real estate’s rebound.

“The fear…is that the inventory of delinquent and foreclosed loans will be released onto an already weakened market,” Tuccillo said. “But the reality, even in Florida where distressed properties make up a significant portion of the market, appears to be different.”

According to the report, the number of closed sales of foreclosures and bank-owned homes peaked in April 2011 with more than 9,000 sales statewide. That fell to less than 4,000 by November. At the same time, short sales _ where the lender agrees to sell the home for less than what the borrower owes on the mortgage _ have steadily increased so that now they make up more of the purchased homes than those in foreclosure.

Tuccillo said fears of another price crash are unfounded because “no business person would flood the market with his inventory just to drive prices downward.”

“Much of the behavior we have seen from lenders, the behavior which has spawned fears of a market devastated by the release of large numbers of distressed properties, was largely the result of confusion over the rules of the game,” Tuccillo said.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 3rd, 2012 at 8:25 am and is filed under Foreclosures, Housing affordability, Housing boom, Mortgages, Real estate bust. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Florida carries burden of 30 percent of nation’s shadow inventory”

12
jeff saturday Says:
May 4th, 2012 at 4:42 am

Judge: Counselor, why are you asking to have this foreclosure dismissed?

Deadbeats lawyer: Your honor, the plaintiff can not prove who owns Mr. Deadbeats loan.

Judge: (to Wells Fargo attorney) Well counselor?

Wells Fargo attorney: Your honor, do you think we would have loaned Mr. Deadbeat $425,000 on a house that he purchased for $125,000 in 1999 when he earns an annual salary of $42,000 if we knew who he was supposed to pay back?

Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 06:14:21

Florida has 30% of the shadow inventory… so how much of the remaining shadow inventory is in California, Arizona, Nevada? And how much is left for the rest of the country?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 07:23:51

If California has a comparable ratio of shadow inventory to its population, then you could guesstimate its shadow inventory by multiplying 30% by the ratio of California’s population to Florida’s population:

California Population
37,691,912 - Jul 2011
Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Florida Population
19,057,542 - Jul 2011
Source: U.S. Census Bureau

30%*(37,691,912/19,057,542) = 59%.

Is that a reasonable guesstimate for CA, given it has roughly twice the population of FL, or is the shadow inventory arguably more dense in FL, suggesting a lower percentage than 59% in CA?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 07:27:18

P.S. Weren’t both FL and CA Spanish colonies before they were U.S. states? What is it about Spain and housing manias?

Economy
Spain real estate ‘madness’ continues despite burst housing bubble
Sharon Smyth, Neil Callanan and Dara Doyle, Bloomberg News May 2, 2012 – 11:53 AM ET
Xabier Mikel Laburu/Bloomberg News files

A sign hangs on a fence at the entrance to a Sacyr residential construction site in Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain.

From atop the stone walls of Avila, Spain, a medieval city an hour’s drive northwest of Madrid, beyond the parking lots and empty playgrounds and thousands of vacant new apartments, a construction crane can be seen moving on the horizon as building continues.

“Avila isn’t an exception,” said Jesus Encinar, co- founder of Madrid-based Idealista, Spain’s largest property website, and an Avila native. “It’s a small-scale example of the madness that gripped the whole real estate industry.”

In the stages of death of a real estate boom, Spain is still in denial. In Ireland, they’re moving toward acceptance. The first auction of one of 2,000 unfinished housing estates takes place tomorrow at the Shelbourne Hotel in central Dublin, with sales expected to fetch cents on the euro, showing the Irish may be closer to the end than the beginning.

“Ireland faced up to its problems faster than others and we expect growth there rather soon,” said Cinzia Alcidi, an analyst at the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels. “In Spain, there was kind of a denial of the scale of the problem and it may be faced with many years of significant challenges before full recovery takes place.”

Spain, Europe’s fifth-largest economy, is the current focus of attempts to contain the region’s sovereign debt crisis, as Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy struggles to quell speculation it will need a bailout. Developers are showing similar optimism. They continue to build even with 2 million homes vacant around the country, new airports that never saw a single flight being mothballed, and property appraisers and banks reporting values have fallen only about 22%, said Encinar, who estimates the real decline is probably at least twice that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:25:39

Weren’t both FL and CA Spanish colonies before they were U.S. states? What is it about Spain and housing manias?

LOL! I don’t think we can blame those two on Spain. Those were our own doing!

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 10:42:25

“I don’t think we can blame those two on Spain. Those were our own doing!”

Having lived in and traveled around both states, I assure you Spanish culture remains a strong force in both places. Add some Mediterranean (or warmer) temperatures, and you have some good fundamental ingredients for a housing mania.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 12:36:31

“Having lived in and traveled around both states, I assure you Spanish culture remains a strong force in both places”

Spanish culture is also a strong force in Texas and New Mexico, yet they were nowhere nearly as bubbly. And how about Canada and Australia? No Iberian heritage there (esepcially not in Oz) and their bubbles put ours to shame.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 18:12:23

“Spanish culture is also a strong force in Texas and New Mexico, yet they were nowhere nearly as bubbly.”

Not everyone wants to live there; in fact, a lot of folks don’t want to live there.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 07:41:38

P-bear, you won’t like where I’m going with this.

If Florida has ~30% shadow inventory, and California has ~59% shadow inventory, that’s 90%. Throw in some for AZ and NV, and now you have a hypothesis that there is (little to) NO shadow inventory in any other state. So, the argument that house prices will “crater” because of “shadow inventory” would only apply to a handful of bubble states, not states like *ahem* Maryland.

Yes, you can always get lucky with a few short sales in nice condition, but I don’t anticipate large-scale cratering.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 08:10:53

Or you could interpret it as them really undercounting the shadow inventory.

 
Comment by CharlieTango
2012-05-04 08:56:18

but I don’t anticipate large-scale cratering.

Oxy,

That 60% number came from nowhere so it serves as a poor bases for you conclusion.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 09:21:33

Or you could interpret it as them really undercounting the shadow inventory.

Perhaps, other than go by anecdotal experience, whay can we go by?

Jeff is always regaling us with the stories of his endless deadbeat friends, coworkers and neighbors who haven’t made mortgage payments in years. I have yet to encounter people like that in my neck of the woods. So maybe Florida really does have 30% of the shadow inventory … or maybe it doesn’t. How can I really know?

What I do know is that houses at and under $200K are selling briskly in my little burg (on average in less than a week after listing), while houses above 300K aren’t moving at all. And from what I’m hearing it’s not investors buying them either. One of my wife’s coworkers sold her house (180K IIRC) and had multiple offers. Yet at the same time a 400K golf course home across the street from us has been on the market for over a year.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 10:21:18

I have yet to encounter people like that in my neck of the woods.

I have a relative doing it right now, but they don’t live near me. They never thought it would go on this long, but as long as nobody is asking them to leave, they can’t see any reason to.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:28:08

Oh, I’m sure there are “deadbeats” even in fair Loveland, as well as a shadow inverntory. It just doesn’t seem so visible as it does in Floriduh.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 10:45:58

‘So, the argument that house prices will “crater” because of “shadow inventory” would only apply to a handful of bubble states, not states like *ahem* Maryland.’

You are wrong, because you forget that ‘everyone wants to live’* in the sand states. A big collapse of prices in FL and CA will eventually spill over into lower prices in MA, due to the force of interstate migration on equilibrium home prices.

*I used parentheses because everyone doesn’t really have to want to live in CA, FL, AZ or NV for my argument to hold up; so long as the marginal buyer would prefer to live in CA or FL to MA, you get the result that equilibrium prices will always be lower in MA than CA or FL.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 11:09:41

I give up.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-05-04 12:31:48

The mania was not isolated to a few states. The mania was not everywhere except where you bought. You bought into the mania, when it is now obvious to most. There is no defence.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 12:38:56

I’d say that the mania was wilder in some places vs. others. And in places with bad fundamentals (i.e. no jobs) the crash will be harder and nastier.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-05-04 23:02:35

Per the LPS Mortgage Monitor, FL’s non-current rate is more than 2x California’s (21% of all mortgages vs. 9.3%). Your analysis assumes the same non-current rate for both states.

There is the added issue though regarding population relative to number of housing units. California has the second highest population per housing unit (ie. fewer homes per the population than nearly everywhere else), Florida is substantially less, so you probably shouldn’t use population, since it would skew things considerably.

Let’s use relative numbers of housing units instead of relative population…more reasonable since we are talking about housing units, not people.

From 2010 Census:

CA had ~9.6 million single-family housing units
FL had ~6.3 million single-family housing units
NV had ~840k single-family housing units
AZ had ~2.3 million single-family housing

Using non-current loan percentage as the way to get to relative numbers (not assuming all states have been dealing with shadow inventory the same):

CA=9.3% non-current
FL=21.5% non-current
NV=15.5% non-current
AZ=9.1% non-current

Now to figure the right proportions:

(FL) if 21.5%*6.3MM=1.35MM=30%
(CA) 9.3%*9.6MM=890k=20%
(NV) 15.5%*840k=130k=3%
(AZ) 9.1%*2.3MM=200k=5%

This analysis puts about 58% of all shadow inventory in those 4 states…which makes much more sense to me.

Oh, and the guy diminishing the effect of shadow inventory in FL? Good luck with that. Only if they trickle it out over such a long period that the number of distressed sales stays a very small percentage of the sales action.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 07:09:50

Got mold?

 
 
Comment by Overtaxed
2012-05-04 04:10:33

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/opinion/fl-college-student-loans-morici-0504-20120504,0,458563.story

People need to go to college and actually “train” for something, not just take the classes with the most good looking women in them? What a crazy idea!

I went to college knowing exactly what I wanted to do, and was at a crossroads between 2 degrees (EE or CS). After my first year, I decided that I liked programming better, and finished out my degree in CS. My classes were about 60-70% non-native English speakers. There was, out of the 1000 or so people in my program, 2 US native women (and probably about 30 or so foreign women, almost all oriental).

Except for one other close friend from high school who went to college to be a teacher, I’m the only person in my group of friends who works in the field that I went to college for. I was trained for a specific industry, and I immediately went to work in that industry after college and have stayed there since.

Almost all of my friends went to college for some esoteric degree (environmental science, history, English Lit, etc) and now work in jobs that have almost no, or no, use for their degree. As a result, they make dramatically less than they could had they gone to school for a degree that actually relates to the field that the work in today.

I was (still am) an odd duck when I was in school, I knew from the age of about 10 that I wanted to work with computers and my enthusiasm for the field never waned; I just kept getting more and more training in a very focused discipline (which has now focused even further into a very tiny segment of the IT industry) and moving towards the job that I have today. I realize that this is quite unusual; but, until you have SOME focus, I really don’t think that going to college “just to go” is a very good idea. Take a few years to work some different jobs and see what you like. Or, go to college for something that’s always employable (sciences, math, accounting, etc). Before you go to college for English Lit or Psychology, you better be darn sure that your path is to a PhD and a teaching position, because, if not, you very well might be flushing all that money down the toilet.

Comment by combotechie
2012-05-04 05:13:57

“… I knew from the age of about ten that I wanted to work with computers and that my enthusiasm never waned.”

What? You didn’t just wake up one morning and decided you had an interest in computers.

“I was (still am) an odd duck.”

That you are.

Comment by Overtaxed
2012-05-04 05:54:36

“What? You didn’t just wake up one morning and decided you had an interest in computers.”

Many of the people who work/worked in computers are there because “computer people make a lot of money”, not for the love of the technology. People who do this are bound to fail, this isn’t a good line of work for someone who’s not actually interested in the technology and has a real passion for it. I’d say that 50%+ of the people I went to school with for computers washed out of either the major or the career (shortly after graduation) because they didn’t have a passion for it.

Most of my friends had no idea at all what they wanted to do when they went to college. No “plan”, no intended career path, just “go” and see what happens. My wife and her brother are in that category, they went to college for no reason other than to go, not to actually train for a job/position.

“What? You didn’t just wake up one morning and decided you had an interest in computers.”

? I guess I did, at some point, have that happen. Not sure what the point of this is though.

Comment by combotechie
2012-05-04 06:03:04

“Not sure what the point of this though.”

The point is you went to college in order to gain an education to furthur your passion. You didn’t go to college to discover what your passion was, that was something you already knew; All you needed to do was develop it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2012-05-04 06:05:17

College can be a very expensive place to go just to find out who you are.

 
Comment by Overtaxed
2012-05-04 07:19:13

“College can be a very expensive place to go just to find out who you are.”

Yup, that’s exactly why I think it’s pretty silly for people to go for majors that either don’t interest them or don’t lead to a quantifiable financial advantage in the job market.

Spending 40-100’s of thousands to get an education in something that provides no real job skills just doesn’t make sense to me. I suppose if you’re already wealthy, by all means, go and make yourself a well rounded person. But, for the vast majority, if you don’t have a goal in mind (doctor, lawyer, engineer, etc) then it doesn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense to me.

This is why, IMHO, many nations (Japan comes to mind) are eating our lunch when it comes to job skills. Culture in different countries is much more “goal oriented” and seems to result in people more able to leave their education (at whatever level) and apply that education to a real job skill.

I’d hazard a guess that the number of foreign students enrolled for things like history, art, and language is dramatically lower (as a proportion) to the number of American students enrolled in those areas. And the reverse is certainly true for the sciences/engineering.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 07:50:50

College can be a very expensive place to go just to find out who you are

Especially at today’s prices. At least in the “good old days” you could major in uinderwater basket weaving at state without having to borrow tons of cash. And corporations used to hire lib arts majors (now they just want biz majors).

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:35:36

I’d hazard a guess that the number of foreign students enrolled for things like history, art, and language is dramatically lower (as a proportion) to the number of American students enrolled in those areas. And the reverse is certainly true for the sciences/engineering.

From what I saw as an employee at two different universities and a student at another, your guess is pretty spot on.

And I would hazard a guess as to why: The foreign governments are subsidizing their students’ education in America. Their subsidies are based on national need. Many of these countries are not as advanced as the U.S., and they need educated people to build their countries.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-05-04 12:37:50

The aviation business is the opposite.

About everybody gets into it because they like flying. About everyone who has been in the business 20 years or longer is looking to get out, because “love” doesn’t pay the bills.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 12:48:00

Kinda like the music business. When I was about to get out of the Army band field one of my buddies got a pretty good gig playing for one of the Mandrell sisters for part of each year and tried to talk me into joining him. I decided to stick with engineering and never regretted it. His life on a houseboat near Nashville sometimes looks kinda fun, but only if I was still single like him. No thanks.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 18:14:12

“College can be a very expensive place to go just to find out who you are”

But a dead-end job with no escape can be far more expensive…

 
 
Comment by Salinasron
2012-05-04 08:00:17

My oldest son went to UC Davis. He started out in nanotechnology, went to EE and ended up with a degree in CS. He hated the work and went back to college; he graduates next month with a PhD in pharmacy (Clinical) and will start a paid residency right after. I have never seen him more focused and work so hard as he has these last five years. His last two years of study have been in non-paid internships (eight) working 10 or more hours per day for six days a week.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Montana
2012-05-04 09:26:12

Haha, he’s gonna really hate pharmacy, if he goes retail.

 
Comment by Salinasron
2012-05-04 11:29:37

He’s strictly hospital based, intensive care and surgical. His retail rotation was in Richmond, CA. His first week was marked with a shoot out across the street. But prior to pharm school he held a pharm. tech license and moonlighted for extra cash.

Retail in CA four years ago was paying $40k to $50K three year sign on bonus if you worked the central valley.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-05-04 12:41:23

Pharmacists……if there is a bigger “I’m in it for the money” job, I’d like to know what it is.

About everyone I know who is in college is either working on an RN degree, or Pharmacy.

I think I smell the next bubble.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 13:15:30

Maybe “I’m in it for the stabilty.” Even the useful degrees like engineering/accounting can be oursourced.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 14:09:58

Even the useful degrees like engineering/accounting can be oursourced.

I’d say engineering and accounting are particularly well-suited for outsourcing.

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 08:15:09

I’d say that 50%+ of the people I went to school with for computers washed out of either the major or the career (shortly after graduation) because they didn’t have a passion for it.

I’m in this weird situation because I wouldn’t say I have a passion for it, but I am smart enough to understand it most of the time and I do have a passion for solving problems and getting product out the door and into the hands of customers. It’s worked out so far, and is the reason that I continue to focus on trying to get into management.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Overtaxed
2012-05-04 08:33:11

“I wouldn’t say I have a passion for it, but I am smart enough to understand it most of the time and I do have a passion for solving problems”

I’d say these statements aren’t compatible. :) IT is all about solving problems, that’s what makes it so interesting to me; figure out a new and efficient way to do something, and do so without the 10 year lead time that it takes to see an idea come to completion in many other engineering disciplines. Imagine figuring out a new way to build an airplane wing. How long before you see that idea actually implemented? Now, imagine figuring out a new way to render a webpage. How long to see that idea on every computer/phone across the world? That’s what makes the “soft side” of IT so engrossing to me, you can test your ideas and model ideas/solutions so much faster than you can in just about any other engineering field.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 08:44:19

I’m not in IT. I’m an EE that writes embedded firmware.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 09:07:10

I think that what Carl means is that while he enjoys the satisfaction of solving a problem or creating a solution for a customer that he isn’t “turned on” 24/7, like some people are. Like those people who after putting in a 12 hour day at the office go home and work on some open source project until midnight every day.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 09:12:55

Yeah…I’m not one of those people. That time gets spent here trying to learn things that don’t make sense to me from people like FPSS :-).

 
Comment by drumminj
2012-05-04 11:12:55

I’m in this weird situation because I wouldn’t say I have a passion for it, but I am smart enough to understand it most of the time and I do have a passion for solving problems and getting product out the door and into the hands of customers.

I’m the same way, Carl. And it affords my lifestyle out of work…

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 06:21:53

Yada yada. Discussed on HBB long ago. But what happens when even the people who go to college for tech are outsourced (like HP), or they themselves are put out of a job by the tech they created?

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 07:02:18

They can go on disability at age 50 and live out decades of golden years as Lucky Duckies getting $800/month of SSI.

See also article on Bloomberg “Gross Says US Economy Suffering From Structural Unemployment”

Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 07:25:40

You can’t even do Oil City on $800/month.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-04 08:22:47

My parents volunteer with seniors on regular Social Security who are living on $800 a month. And in MA where you need heat for a good chunk of the year. They send a lot of them to the church food pantries after they help them with their Medicare part D enrollment.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 07:41:14

when even the people who go to college for tech are outsourced (like HP)

Dave Packard wrote in his memoirs (The HP Way) that he never intended HP to be a “hire and fire” company. Sad how that legacy has been thrown under the bus. I’m hearing from my still at HP friends that a massive layoff is in the works. I wonder if HP will still be around in 10 years, or if it will be taken over by another company?

Comment by MightyMike
2012-05-04 08:37:04

That’s the way of corporations. When Mr. Packard and Mr. Hewlett owned the company they could run it as they liked. Once their share of ownership became rather small and they had to be concerned about satufying Wall Street, the bottom line had to become more important than anything else, including their own personal feelings about how to treat their employees decently.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 08:46:11

Which is what I was talking about the other day when somebody said no, companies look at the long term all the time. To me, this is short term thinking.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 09:03:24

Actually, HP stayed fairly true to the HP Way until both Bill and Dave were pushing daisys up. Their heirs, who inherited control of the H & P families now minority shares lacked the “gravitas” their father’s had and were unable to stop Carly’s leading HP down a path of destruction. Once Hewlett died Carly threw the HP Way out of the window.

Dave Packard was opposed to growth for growth’s sake. He mentioned in his book that he and Hewlett passed over many opportunities for quick growth. In his own words, he said: “More big companies die of indigestion than starvation.” He also mentioned how he dropped his guard once, when he allowed HP to acquire Apollo Computer, and how that had been a big mistake.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 10:06:33

Corvallis is down to about 2000 here in Oregon after a high of over 7000 a decade ago. When I called on them in their heyday, I was told that for every HP employee, there were 3-5 people in Corvallis who called on them in one way or other. (engineering sales like me, landscapers, caterers, you name it)

Carly changed all that, and HP became controlled by the buyers and not the engineers. I would work on a spec with an engineer only to be told we had to figure out how to use something that was half the cost. So, either we lowered our price or had to settle for a lower spec.

To take this a step further, and sorry for politicizing this thread, I have several righty friends who keep complaining
about jobs but who, as hardline conservatives, are lining up behind….Romney. As diplomatically as I can, I’ve pointed out their hypocrisy and offer my Carly story (and how righties lined up behind her in CA even after knowing her history at HP) about how people like her and Romney offshore jobs and couldn’t care less about them. To no avail.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:38:34

“(and how righties lined up behind her in CA even after knowing her history at HP”

Not only did she offshore everything in sight, she was fired for poor results.

I think HP is a goner. The printer golden egg laying goose is dying. Without it HP will whither and die as there is absolutely no innovation going on in company anymore, just “me too”, outsourced products. Under the current management the ink jet business would never had happened as they lack the patience and teh willingness to invest in the future. Unless there is payback in the immediate future they won’t do it.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 10:59:51

And don’t forget she escaped with $20M. How much R&D could have been done for that price tag?

Corvallis used to be huge IJBU. Now they are working on things like home entertainment (?) and large scale OEM printing presses.

I once sold them $1.5M per year in product. Now I do MAYBE $50-100k per year.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:39:01

I think HP is a goner. The printer golden egg laying goose is dying. Without it HP will whither and die as there is absolutely no innovation going on in company anymore, just “me too”, outsourced products.

I agree.

Back in the day, I worked in an office that had an HP Laserjet II printer. Thing was a tank. And it printed like nobody’s business.

These days, HP’s printers are cheap junk.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 12:08:25

They took the Gillette route and went all out to sell ink instead of hardware. The buyer I used to work with is exclusively an ink trader these days.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 12:27:13

You can get away with the Gillette approach when your product is superior. In HP’s case it no longer is better than the competition.

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2012-05-04 09:46:56

Charles Hugh Smith had a great essay yesterday on this topic.

readers question:

“I would very much like to learn your thoughts on what careers may be viable for our children. With the future likely to change our lives so dramatically, where do you see opportunities for some form of career growth and some form of stability? “

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 10:21:40

Hedge all bets. Major in engineering, with a minor in business. Go on to advanced degree in medicine. Sorry, junior, no frat parties for you!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 10:23:24

Oh, and learn two foreign languages.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:44:22

Being fluent in Spanish has never helped me careerwise.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:45:43

“Hedge all bets. Major in engineering, with a minor in business”

Colorado State U has a dual DVM/MBA program. Kind of makes sense as a lot of veterinarians run their own practices.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 10:56:10

Being fluent in Spanish has never helped me careerwise.

I was thinking Chinese for the tech world, and Spanish/Chinese for the medical world. And both help with that other side of the brain.

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 11:40:00

This idea only applies to parents who actually give a sh*t about their kids’ futures and do actual parenting. Which is mostly a middle class, upper middle class thing (the 1%ers can just buy their kids jobs and admission to Harvard), as well as a minority of poor immigrants.

Consider that most of this country is on track toward Idiocracy. TeeVee and high fructose corn syrup do the parenting, resulting in the majority of this country being fat and uneducated. Most Lucky Duckies can’t envision anything beyond their next trip to McDonalds or who’s on Dancing With The Stars tonight, let alone their kids’ future “careers”.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-04 12:39:57

I was thinking Chinese for the tech world

How ’bout those folks who studied Russian back in the day. Not so helpful now, huh?

New studies have shown that learning a language or instrument or any other brain cell boosting activity works better if coupled with exercise. By itself, those crossword puzzles aren’t going to help with memory retention.

I’ve been wondering where I can get a RFID for my glasses, wallet, coffee cup, and keys.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 12:45:40

Agreed. And in my neck of the woods, Spanish, Chinese, AND even Russian would be helpful to know if working in a hospital. Plenty of practice.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-05-04 12:57:06

Future career fields?

We can take our guidance from the African-American community, since they have been Lucky Duckies longer, and have figured things out a long time before us Dumazz crackers.

Boys = Sports. At minimum, you will get a free college degree, and if you don’t/can’t go pro, you can become a talking head, or get hired by a rich alum who wants you around for PR.

(A former female friend worked at a major law firm. One of the employees was a retired MLB player. No college at all. Tells baseball stories all day. Said his job description should say “Professional BS Artist”)

Girls = Professional “Skank”. The skankier, looser the morals/apparant self esteem, the better.

A dumb hot chick will go a lot farther than a high IQ average chick, 90% of the time. Either look around you, or turn on your TV to see hundreds of examples.

Self repect is overrated.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 13:05:43

Funny X-GS. A masters in Snookie!

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 13:19:28

The Lucky Ducky community has figured out every line and loophole in the government cheese laws. That’s how they make their living.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 15:09:54

Auto mechanic, electrician, plumber. Low stress jobs that cannot be outsourced and that allow you to grow as much or as little as you want. My auto mechanics have it great- a little old stone garage on the edge of downtown, all the business they can handle because of their location plus they’re honest and relatively inexpensive, they have a bunch of old cars and strange little go-carts that they’re playing around with when I pick up my car after work. Seems pretty mellow, and the harder times are the more people hang onto old cars needing repairs. Hell, my old Volvo and VW probably put their kids through college. (Never again!)

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-04 15:36:15

Auto mechanic, electrician, plumber. Low stress jobs that cannot be outsourced and that allow you to grow as much or as little as you want.

Delete auto mechanic (my former career) from that list. Unless you want to be a sidewalk mechanic, you gotta keep your skills up to date.

Many of my friends are/were tradespeople. We were all good in our 20’s and 30’s. But construction, auto mechanics, landscaping, etc. gets harder as you age. I got out of mechanics in my mid-30’s because I wanted to have kids and it was just too toxic.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 16:25:14

it was just too toxic.

My guys wear plastic gloves- their hands are as clean as mine.

Yeah, you gotta stay up to date, but who doesn’t? I can’t argue with what I see. They have all the business they care to handle (in fact there are several brands of cars they refuse to work on, and they pretty much take only referrals as new customers), they’ve got music playing in the shop, cats sitting in the sunny windows with the plants, neat old cars they’re fixing up…seems pretty sweet’n'easy to me. I don’t see where any pressure would come from.

Came across the same thing when my car broke down driving to Florida. There was some guy with his own little shop, specializing in German cars(always a money-maker), in the middle of nowhere (Cleveland,Tennessee I think- very oil City), but he was just off I-75, in the most mountainous stretch of the entire highway (exactly where your car might finally reach its breaking point) , and he had quite a few cars in there. It was just him and another guy, and it seemed very similar to my guys’ setup.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-05-04 10:36:08

“I knew from the age of about 10 that I wanted to work with computers”

I envy people who are focused like this. I tell my kids I still don’t know what I want to be when I grow up. I had a music teacher in high school who told my mother I could be a professional musician (French horn) if I wanted to be. Music was not the only thing I was interested in, so I did not pursue it. I ended up in computers and it has been a good fit.

Through the years, I have known a significant number of people who had English or liberal arts degrees who ended up in computers. Some of them in the technical side and some in the user interface or design side. Psychologists are particularly well suited for UI work. To get your foot in the door today, you probably need a technical certificate of some sort in addition to a liberal arts degree.

IMHO, the UI/design people are as important as the technical people for producing a successful product. And those who can explain technical things to a non-technical audience are even rarer than the pure technical people.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:30:35

I realize that this is quite unusual; but, until you have SOME focus, I really don’t think that going to college “just to go” is a very good idea.

Unfortunately, your sentiment runs squarely against a lot of the brainwashing that kids get. Many parents (and kids) view themselves as failures if they don’t go straight from high school to a “good” school.

That being said, I agree with you.

 
Comment by mikeinbend
2012-05-04 13:32:29

Ding Ding
I went to college with no initiative of my own. My parents thought I should have a degree. So I entered the EE program; failed out, almost out of UCSB, before getting a “Law and Society” BA degree.

Useless. Completely. Except now they use BA’s as a basic screening tool; so you are darned if you go; darned even worse if you don’t. Unless you are an entrepeneur.
Got into farming and was passionate about the cause, no thanks to school.
When I decided I wanted to be a teacher; bam two more years of college.
On my own dime I had a 4.0. Too bad about the 6 years wasted initially(academically; the surfing and partying and girl studying were epic); and the 2.0 GPA that accompanied my tomfoolery.

But, as fate would have it, I picked one of the only states that requires a masters to continue teaching (the teaching license was useful, and I suppose the BA was instrumental in getting into a licensure program, but I could have gone into education initially for that matter).

So unless you plan to get a hard science degree, BA’s for the sake of BAs are useless.

On the other hand, a cop guest lecturer here at the high school today(my long term gig got moved to October so I am back wherever they will have me!) said to be considered as a law enforcement candidate you have to have some college now.

Says he is a 31 Y.O. cop who makes 75k per year with no college. Seems a detective position that had 70 applicants 6 years ago has 300 now. So they use college to screen them.

So it is a f’up world. I gotta have a masters to teach, but a policeman makes double what I can; right from Les Schwab tire guy to cop. But even that avenue is currently congested according to him. So its too late, ya gotta go to college (and to come full circle regarding the utility of at least some college in today’s job market)

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 14:59:26

Says he is a 31 Y.O. cop who makes 75k per year with no college. Seems a detective position that had 70 applicants 6 years ago has 300 now. So they use college to screen them.

My mother’s father was a detective. No college degree, just a lot of street smarts, which he passed on to Mom.

Trust me, I couldn’t put anything past my mother. Nothing, zip, nada. The woman had/has eyes in the back of her head.

 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 04:46:44

Realtors Are Liars

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2012-05-04 05:55:31

“Realtor$ Are Thieving Pukes®”

That beg$ the question: What does that make these folk$?:

[Define: Indemnified!] :-)

They’re ProFee$$ional$ / oozing Ethical$ from the pore$ of their $oul$ / & laboring every second of every hour of every day, … doing God’s work! Right? Right??

“If you get screwed,” Theodore Eppenstein says, “now you have no place to go.”
Looking for Luxuries

No place to go, that is, if you’re looking for luxuries like publicly filed documents, juries that hear the facts and judges that preside over open proceedings.

The McMahon decision was damaging enough for the impact it had on individual brokerage customers, who tell their stories about fraud, misrepresentation and churning behind closed doors where the public — including reporters — isn’t welcome. Perhaps worse is what happens when a powerful industry gets accustomed to keeping its squabbles quiet: Wrongdoers are inclined to relax, sending ethics to ever-lower lows.

“It means that all sorts of scams against individuals, however large, are very unlikely to come to the attention of the media and the public,”

Wall Street’s Legal Magic Ends an American Right:
BloombergBy Susan Antilla | Bloomberg – 13 hours ago

American business entered its Teflon era on a spring day 25 years ago.

Lawyer Madelaine Eppenstein had taken the morning off from work for a parent-teacher event at her 5-year-old’s elementary school on June 8, 1987, when she was summoned to the principal’s office for an urgent call. Her husband and law partner, Theodore Eppenstein, told her they lost the Supreme Court case he had argued two months before on behalf of a couple trying to sue their stockbroker for fraud.

“I felt like I got punched in the face,” she told me in an interview late last month.

If Eppenstein was punched, the investing public was mauled. The case known as Shearson v. McMahon would wind up locking investors out of U.S. courts any time they tried to sue a broker. A tiny clause in customer agreements turned out to be Wall Street’s magic formula to keep its transgressions out of sight. The agreement that Eugene and Julia McMahon signed said that any dispute between them and their broker at Shearson/American Express Inc. — a trusted fellow parishioner at their church –”shall be settled by arbitration” in a Wall Street forum. Investors since then have either had to agree to similar terms, or forget about having a securities account.

heheeheeheeeheeeheeeeheee :-/

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-04 07:00:06

If nothing else comes from this latest recession, (and I don’t think for one minute there’s going to be any real reform) it’s that I sincerely hope people end up with the same attitudes toward the FIRE sector they had from the Great Depression.

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 07:06:08

Ditech: “People are smart”

No they’re not. Hamster wheel debt slavery is the only way so many sheeple have known for so long, how could they imagine living any differently?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 08:21:31

What different does attitude make in a needs industry? People have to have insurance, people have to live somewhere. Therefore they have to buy those products from sombody, and the lesser of evils is still evil.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-04 08:25:46

Stockbroker. Not insurance broker.

 
Comment by Al
2012-05-04 08:55:14

You can also minimize insurance costs such as having high deductables on car and home insurance, skipping collision, etc. Only the most very basic. Health insurance is a tougher one.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-04 09:35:15

Tough? 52 million already have NO health insurance and won’t be getting it anytime soon, if ever.

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 10:04:04

In addition to those 52 million, consider how many people think they are insured until they have a real medical event and get denied/dropped coverage.

“Health” insurance companies operate on the same sociopathic model of the Wall Street pigmen, and their pig executives are long overdue for a date with a lamppost and rope :)

 
Comment by Al
2012-05-04 10:25:51

Tough, as in taking the least expensive option when there is a choice. How many would chose no health insurance when they can afford it, or chose a crappy plan when they can afford a good one?

It’s easy to drop collision on a $3000 car when you can easily afford to replace it.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-04 10:51:38

The workforce has 152 million people.

52 million of them cannot afford ANY type of health insurance. Hell they really can’t afford ANY type of insurance, period.

Why? Because of that 152 million workforce population, 72 million make $500 a week or less. That’s almost half of the workforce.

So the example of “tough” now only applies the other 80 million. Well minus the 1%s. So that now makes roughly ~70 million people.

So it looks like the 52 million number is in fact, outdated.

Guess what happens to a nation that can’t afford health care? “Maintaining an empire and increasing standard of living” is neither one those things.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2012-05-04 05:25:58

An article from the New York Times: For Craftsmen, Fragile Lifeline From Craigslist:

“With few places to turn, construction workers have colonized Craigslist as the cyberspace equivalent of the street corner or the Home Depot parking lot. Some are getting more than they bargained for as they search for ad hoc jobs. One Palm Beach man who previously worked on crews renovating Walmart stores agreed to clean out an apartment after a tenant committed suicide. But he drew the line at hanging up a sex swing.”

I found it an interesting read about how some of the displaced workers in the construction trades are scraping by in the post boom bust.

Here’s the line to the article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/business/economy/for-craftsmen-craigslist-is-a-slender-lifeline.html?smid=pl-share

Comment by scdave
2012-05-04 06:18:51

The underemployed labor group….Reading the article, it is what I have witnessed around here for a couple of years…Highly qualified tradesmen scrambling to do anything to make a buck…

Comment by Northeastener
2012-05-04 09:28:51

With few places to turn, construction workers have colonized Craigslist as the cyberspace equivalent of the street corner or the Home Depot parking lot. Some are getting more than they bargained for as they search for ad hoc jobs.

I’m working on an app that can help to address this very problem… hopefully more effectively and promptly than craigslist (else what’s the point).

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 09:50:32

It seems that most jobs are on Craigslist now. Gone are the days when jobs (and most other things) were advertised in the newspaper’s classifieds.

Comment by Northeaster
2012-05-04 10:19:10

readership and more importantly subscribership are down for local newspapers and the local rag websites are often pretty poor, hence the move to “free” craigslist or backpage for classifieds

but, would you say craigslist ads are effective: defined as relevent, timely, and reliable?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:42:39

I sold a piano and a gym school quality trampoline on Craigslist, and both sold quickly and at the price I was hoping to get.

As for jobs, it’s hard to say. My previous employer advertised on Craigslist a lot.

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-04 10:48:49

Depends on how good you are with your serch terms. And how good the ads are with including appropriate key words.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-04 12:41:20

but, would you say craigslist ads are effective: defined as relevent, timely, and reliable?

My motto is: “If you can’t buy it used on craigslist, you don’t need it”

 
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 09:31:09

lmao… that’s too funny….. read this from the article:

But he has rebuffed other responses to his ads, variations on “RENT A HUSBAND ! ! ! HANDYMAN SERVICES - 25% OFF.” Last month, he said, “I had a guy call me 10 o’clock at night and ask me if I had a vise. And I said yeah, and he said ‘Can you meet me somewhere and I want to put my hand in the vise and you crush it?’ ” Ken said he demurred.

Then there was the woman from Fort Lauderdale who called wanting to hire him to rig up a sex swing while her husband was away. “She wanted me to come hang it in her ‘room of doom,’ ” he said. “She offered me a lot of money, but I said ‘No, no it just doesn’t seem like something I want to get involved in.’ ”

One guy wants his balls crushed in a vice and some old broad wants a gigolo…. lmao.

 
 
Comment by cottagechris
2012-05-04 05:26:01

Not sure if this was posted: Some Flippers could be hit with a nice Canada Revenue Agency tax bill:

Some investors who bought new homes or condos in the past few years planning to flip them in a hot Toronto market are facing HST bills of up to $30,000.

That’s because they didn’t read the fine print on the purchase agreement and they now have a problem that relates to the HST rebate that is available to buyers of new homes under certain conditions.

In plain terms, you can get a rebate on sales tax paid for new homes…but only if you live in them. Looks like some people are screwed!

http://www.moneyville.ca/article/1167175–why-cra-wants-30-000-hst-rebates-back

 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 05:42:27

National Association of Realt-Liars is in the top 3 bribe payers to DC this year

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2012&indexType=s

Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 06:15:45

Which corrupt congressman/senator accepted the largest realtor bribe so far this year? I bet he/she was a republican or democrat.

Comment by michael
2012-05-04 06:40:14

did you just ask yourself a question?

(jk)

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 06:45:24

The chart is for lobbying costs, not for direct political contributions.

Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 07:14:21

A distinction without a difference.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-05-04 08:36:26

There absolutely is a difference. If you pay a lobbyist $1000 an hour to put together stats and charts and graphs and reports and the lobbyist manages to get it in the door at a Congressional office so some low level staffer reads it, that staffer may draft an outline for the Rep that uses your slant on the meaning of the numbers. It is incidious when only big business can afford the good lobbyists, but you can’t fault people for wanting to communicate with members of Congress about things that impact their business.

Political contributions are just giving money to the rep’s reelection campaign or to the party directly after a conversation with the rep (they are required to raise big bucks this way or face the wrath of the leadership) are a very different animal.

Good grief, lobbying expenditures *could* be on a properly conducted scientific study of something. Not that the information would get out if the results don’t support the position of the person requesting the study, but it could be.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 09:20:21

You’re wasting your time, Polly.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 09:21:26

Whether public policy is influenced by direct campaign contributions or indirect bribes through lobbyists is a distinction without a difference.

 
Comment by polly
2012-05-04 11:03:22

So putting together information about the evironmental impact of a particular farming subsidy is the same as a bribe? You are going to have to explain that one to me.

A lot of the lobbying that goes on in this town is nasty. It can just be a guy going to a rep’s office and dangling future donations. More often is is giving the donations outright along with a statement of where they came from and what those people care about these days.

It also can be similar to when I was on a project team writing some stuff [details deleted] and we had a few meetings with people who represented the different parst of the industry that was regulated. They told us what information the software systems their industry already used provided (and filled us in on some of the internal terms of art), so we could see if we could get what we needed without overly burdening them. We also got a big song and dance about how X is really part of Y and should be reported that way. We used the info that we needed, spent some time discussing the whole X is part of Y thing, decided we disagreed and rejected the suggestion (all this a vast oversimplification). Lobbying can be like that too.

It is, of course, much easier for lobbying to be similar to my example, if there was no money involved, as there wasn’t for us, but it isn’t impossible even with our system. A Rep could refuse to do the bidding of the party leadership, refuse to listen to anyone who gave them more than $100 (or represented anyone who gave them more than $100), plan on only being in office for one term, and try it. It would still be possible to communicate because e-mail and the internet and tweets are cheap. I’d like to see it tried at least once. But honestly it would be a lot of work and the people who want to be in Congress like the shmoozing or they wouldn’t be in politics to begin with.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-04 11:48:00

I’m sure it’s all very legal per the jot and tittle of the law. But as Dick Durbin put it, if he’s got a hundred voicemails when he gets back to the hotel room, he’s going to take the ones from the big donors first.

Regardless of the nature of the lobbying expense it’s almost certainly highly directed to influence policy. Or else it wouldn’t be lobbying.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2012-05-04 06:45:13

Ok RAL…you are not going to believe this but here goes…

My wife and I have been “in the market” for a house for 5 years now. Once or twice a year my wife will reach out to this realtor we met who actually lives in the neighborhood we want to live.

We saw a house we really liked so my wife called the real estate agent. She basically told my wife that although it is a nice house, the original builder was questionable and that the neighbors on each side are horrible.

I couldn’t believe that she was actually being honest with us.

Comment by michael
2012-05-04 06:46:45

she also said the street is very very busy and probably not good since we have a 2 and half year old and another one on the way.

Comment by palmetto
2012-05-04 07:12:48

“She basically told my wife that although it is a nice house, the original builder was questionable and that the neighbors on each side are horrible.”

Translation: “The property is fabulous. In fact, I’m going to submit a lowball bid for myself/colleague/friend/investor. Reasonable bids from buyers such as yourself would mess things up.”

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 11:33:30

+1. That’s how I would read it. Do your own research. Drive by at different hours of the day including both weekends and weekdays.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-05-04 07:16:08

michael
So ask this decent UHS what “sister” areas (similar look, size, feel) are out there from another builder, and keep a watch out for a home there.

Also, ask for the tract list in the area (or download it from the local regional association) and start looking for all the “sister” neighborhoods. For instance, we know our ideal floor plan was built by 4 builders and has 10 locations. 4 are possibilities, the rest are awful traffic noise neighborhoods.

I’m licensed in Ca (career isn’t in residential), and we are actively looking ourselves.

That UHS is a rare find.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 07:12:00

That’s actually stunning.

–>Did she immediately offer a alternate a’la shell game scam?

Comment by michael
2012-05-04 08:43:38

nope…but i do like palmetto’s perspective.

Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-04 11:50:36

I once had a realtor explain to me that a house next to train tracks was not noisy or in any way undesirable. 8-O

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:56:54

Here in Tucson, there’s a hip and trendy neighborhood called Dunbar Spring. And a railroad track runs right by it.

I’ve never understood what the attraction of the Union Pacific is. I mean, come on. I’m almost two miles away from those tracks, and there are times when the train sounds like it’s going through my living room.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-05-04 12:10:18

Train horns are quite Andy Griffith-ish as a faint background noise. Otherwise, who in their right
mind would love to feel the rattle and hear the noise.

We’ve turned down some “good buys” and let other go for
it due to noise issues of any kind. We’re too damn old for that nonsense.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-04 12:42:43

Train horns are quite Andy Griffith-ish as a faint background noise.

I feel the same way about fog horns. I love to hear them but not right out my window

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 12:45:46

I feel the same way about fog horns. I love to hear them but not right out my window

True story: When I was a wee little Slim, my family went on vacation to Nantucket Island. This was back when said island was still affordable for those who weren’t running hedge funds.

Any-hoo, we were renting a cottage in town, right by the harbor, and whooooooop! A very loud horn went off. I freaked out. Major tears, fear, comforting hugs of the motherly sort.

ISTR that it was a fog horn.

 
Comment by rms
2012-05-04 15:43:04

And a railroad track runs right by it.

We have a major east - west rail corridor right through downtown with a daily run of 12 to 18 heavy mountain trains of 120 plus cars and five engines that stretch for miles. They love to blow the horn long-n-loud as they pass through the center of town, but hey, housing costs are…

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2012-05-04 16:45:11

“Train horns are quite Andy Griffith-ish as a faint background noise.

Same here. We have to be outside and it has to be really still. Even the banjo music has become pretty much inaudible here, only 40 years after the release of “Deliverance.” :-)

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 17:42:51

Trains are great heard in the distance, a nightmare anywhere closer. Remember that traintracks are often far busier at night- you can spend 2 hours at an open house and never have a train go by, but that first night after you buy, there may be one every half hour, roaring by so fast and loud that the whole house shakes, and no one can sleep through it. That’s a first night to remember.

 
Comment by Localandlord
2012-05-04 20:12:14

I love the trains. They are close enough to shake the house a little and I love the rumble - puts me to sleep somtimes. BUT - no horns. Well every now and then a new conductor lays on the horn by mistake, but I can’t recall one ever waking me up.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-05-04 23:03:23

I once rented a house next to railroad tracks. I never woke up for the trains.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-05 03:06:15

I never woke up for the trains.

Then it was a slow spur. I know someone who lives next to a busy main track, those trains go by with incredible power, all night long. Ever stood on the side of an interstate when a semi roars by at 80 mph? Multiply that by about twenty to experience what the trains feel like. The entire house shakes. She’s lived there for years and says it still wakes her up.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 07:12:56

Is it already too late to “Sell in May, Go away”? Or will a QE3 announcement at the next FOMC meeting make those who stayed in the market look smart?

May 4, 2012, 9:52 a.m. EDT
U.S. stocks take opening dip on jobs report
By Kate Gibson, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) —U.S. stocks fell sharply Friday after April’s job gains came in below forecasts and an upward revision to the prior month and a decline in the jobless rate failed to curb opening losses.

The jobs report was “a little disappointing, but I don’t put a tremendous amount of credence in some of the reports, as the weather has really moved up some of the economic activity this year,” said Mike McGervey, president and founder of McGervey Wealth Management in North Canton, Ohio. “Seasonal jobs normally created now were already created in prior months.”

Comment by Ryan
2012-05-04 09:41:27

Again, the real story here is participation rates, which have fallen to levels last seen in 1981. A total of 522k left the labor force. Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/people-not-labor-force-soar-522000-labor-force-participation-rate-lowest-1981

It’s amazing how well-rigged the BLS numbers are; the jobs market was in the basement already and is now digging into the floor. Yet, somehow, through the magic of calculation the unemployment rate holds steady or goes down.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 10:39:22

“Yet, somehow, through the magic of calculation the unemployment rate holds steady or goes down.”

If the actual number unemployed stays the same but 522K unemployed people leave the labor force, the unemployment rate drops:

New UE rate = (Old number unemployed - Newly discouraged workers)/(Old number in labor force - Newly discouraged workers).

Since the newly discouraged workers subtract a larger proportion from the “Old number unemployed” than from the “Old number in labor force,” the “New UE rate” is smaller, even though the employment picture worsened due to more people who could be working leaving the work force.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:44:06

Again, the real story here is participation rates, which have fallen to levels last seen in 1981.

I plead guilty to being one of those 1981 non-participants. Spent a good chunk of that year bicycling around the United States.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 18:16:23

I was among the underemployed in 1981…low level job at a department store.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 10:48:32

Behind the dark cloud of every market correction, there is a silver lining.

May 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EDT
Oil and gas prices look like they’ve peaked
Commentary: No supply crunch, easing tension in Middle East
By Howard Gold

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Remember just a few short weeks ago, when the media were speculating about how high gasoline prices could go? I know—I wrote a story like that myself.

[Read why Howard Gold thought gasoline prices would remain high on MoneyShow.com.]

In early March, gasoline prices hit $3.94 a gallon, and topped the magic $4.00 mark in California and other states. That was based on a jump in Brent crude oil prices to $128 a barrel.

Some of it was due to a growing U.S. economy and some logistical issues. But the main reason was fear of either an Israeli air strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities or Iranian military action to break sanctions from the international community.

Now, as negotiations with Iran have resumed and war talk has quieted, investors and speculators have realized how weak the fundamentals in the energy market are. Their response: sell. On Wednesday, Brent traded on the spot market just below $118 a barrel, an 8% drop from the peak.

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-05-04 19:22:29

I am sure it will drop down to $40 per barrel just in time to get President Organizer re-elected. :lol:

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 07:22:43

Mike in Bend, you proposed spending your potential $100K on a master’s degree. With just five minutes of googling, this is what I came up with:

————

Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT) —NOT ACCEPTING STUDENTS 2011–2012
Immersion Program: This program is a one-year, full-time experience. Students are placed in culturally diverse schools in Salem and Portland. The program leads to initial elementary teaching licensure, an ESOL/Bilingual Endorsement and the master’s degree.
Two-Year, Part-Time Program: This program is a part-time program. Students attend classes on campus approximately one weekend a month for two academic years. The program leads to initial elementary teaching licensure, an ESOL/Bilingual Endorsement and the master’s degree.

http://catalog.oregonstate.edu/MajorDetail.aspx?major=2310&college=03

Graduate Tuition and Fee Schedule for 2011–2012

Full-time students, 9 to 16 credits per term (resident)
Per term $3,925.67
Per year $11,777.01 [sounds like a quarter system instead of a semester system?]

http://catalog.oregonstate.edu/ChapterDetail.aspx?key=37

————-

The Master’s degree will cost $25K in tuition, at most, NOT $100K. If you bought a house outright and saved $1000/month in rent, the rent savings alone would pay for your masters degree. If you did the part time program, you could still sub teach during the masters — at a private school if you had to — and even further defray the cost of your education. Of course, I don’t know if this is the right thing for you, and only you can decide what to do.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 07:53:20

It’s amazing how much tuition has gone up in just a few years. My worthless MBA cost $10K, half of which my employer paid. And I graduated in 2005. I believe that same degree, at the same State U, would now cost $25K today.

Comment by oxide
2012-05-04 08:24:48

I couldn’t find how many classes/credits you need for the degree, but I thought that Master’s were one year worth of classes, 18 months at most? The masters may cost $12K instead of $25K.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 08:55:31

In my case it was 36 units. It took two years, on a part time schedule.

I just looked at the school’s website. The current cost for the evening MBA program is about $32K. So now students can pay 3x more for the same worthless degree.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-04 09:39:06

MBA now or be priced forever!

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 09:48:06

Too bad I can’t “flip” my sheepskin. I’d be willing to part with it for $20K!

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 09:52:51

The University of Denver’s MBA program is 80 credits x $1062 per credit hour = $85,000.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 10:40:32

I sometimes wonder who can actually afford places like DU or Regis?

Imagine coughing up 85K for an MBA and not getting a single job offer.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-04 10:53:48

That’s easy to answer: The sons and daughters of the board of directors.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:49:29

Many years ago, I was thinking of getting an MBA. And, wouldn’t you know it, I got a job at the University of Pittsburgh, which had a very generous deal on employee tuition.

My job consisted of annotating academic business and economic books. And, yes, that was every bit as exciting as it sounds. My biggest challenge was staying awake.

I was required to annotate quite a few books used in MBA programs. Man, I was bored!

So, in short, I decided not to go for the MBA.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 11:50:58

My thoughts on an “MBA,” since it’s worthless anyway:

Find a decent biz school and visit their bookstore. Get the books for the MBA specialty you’re interested in and create your own MBA. Use the knowledge to demonstrate ability, put it on a resume. Granted, I’m sure most employers are looking for the acronym “MBA” on a resume but experience and demonstrated ability should count for something. A lot cheaper anyway…

 
Comment by butters
2012-05-04 12:02:01

personalmba.com

I like it. I have read few books mentioned there.

In 2007, I actually applied to 3 MBA programs. Took GMAT, did pretty well. Got accepted in one top 20 program, but at the last minute I bailed out. Turned out to be a good decision.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 12:43:13

personalmba.com

I like it. I have read few books mentioned there.

I read the book associated with the above site. The part about why one should avoid going for an MBA was quite good. But the actual MBA course material bored me up one wall and down the other.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 12:44:54

I sometimes wonder who can actually afford places like DU or Regis?

I’m surprised to hear the two in the same sentence…when I went to Regis it felt a little under-rated to me and nobody seemed to think Regis was at all close to DU in desirablity. I went in the late 90s and early 2000s and my employers paid for all of it. I didn’t think it was that expensive at the time. More of just a “well, guess I’ll go ahead and take some classes just in case it comes in handy someday” kind of thing. I paid for each class up front and then got reimbursed.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-05-04 12:50:20

But the actual MBA course material bored me up one wall and down the other.

I actually kind of liked mine and the stuff I didn’t like was still good for me (the accounting and statistics type of stuff I’d always avoided).

 
 
 
Comment by butters
2012-05-04 11:42:47

My worthless MBA cost $10K

Did you learn anything even though it didn’t help with your career advancement?

Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 12:29:02

I can calculate Net Present Value :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hi-Z
2012-05-04 14:46:06

So can Excel.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-05-04 15:56:09

i know :-)

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2012-05-04 14:43:02

“It’s amazing how much tuition has gone up in just a few years.”

My masters cost about $12k, and I graduated in 2009. My wife is in the same program and I am projecting it will cost around $15k, and she’ll graduate in 2013.

Comment by Patrick
2012-05-04 19:29:46

Talked about this the other day. My son’s from Laurier University cost $21,000 tuition and mine a zillion years ago cost $3,000. He has an accounting ($24,000) and a law degree ($24,000) as well. All numbers approximate.

When my four children went off to university I took a vow of perpetual poverty and I have been very good at keeping it too !

Was it worth it ? Absolutely - they have all done well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Thieving Pukes®
2012-05-04 08:01:42

Just for shits and giggles, if you had the opportunity to meet up with other folks on the HBB, who would you want to meet?

Me? I want to have a sit down with Jethro and suck down a couple pots of coffee and trade war stories. GS seems like a real far out dude too. Nickpapageorgio might provide some interesting conversation. Mike(in MD i think) and CarrieAnn too.

Comment by butters
2012-05-04 08:24:11

Oh, no…….

I don’t want my worlds to collide.

Comment by butters
2012-05-04 08:32:35

Seriously though….It had to be Aladinsane for me.
He is/was crazier…..

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 08:56:48

“far out”? If you wanna get far out you can meet me here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crestone,_Colorado

at the Lotus Cafe, bring your dogs and guns and drugs!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 11:51:46

Having met several HBB-ers in person or over the phone, I can say that you’re at least as entertaining in real life as you are on this board. So, I vote for more meetups.

Speaking of which, anyone coming to Tucson? I’d love to organize one here.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 11:58:50

I am fortunate to have shared tater tots and microbrews (and discussion of overpriced housing) with Oly.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-05-04 12:29:31

“…microbrews…”

Thought Oly was LDS?

Comment by sfrenter
2012-05-04 12:44:05

Thought Oly was LDS

She was come-to-your-senses-ex-LDS

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-05-04 12:49:43

“She was come-to-your-senses-ex-LDS”

Yep. I think it was only her fam back in Utahrr that was still practicing…

IIRC she was drinking a Terminator Stout. So not only a microbrew, but a pretty heavy one at that. Cheers, Oly!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 12:51:31

IIRC she was drinking a Terminator Stout. So not only a microbrew, but a pretty heavy one at that. Cheers, Oly!

I’ll bet she also enjoyed The Devastator. That’s from Wasatch Brewing, which also offers Polygamy Porter.

 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 12:47:50

Tater tots and micro brewskis with Oly? Sounds like a good time. I’m jealous.

And romp through the Eternal Forest in peace, Oly!

 
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-05-04 19:45:26

“Me? I want to have a sit down with Jethro and suck down a couple pots of coffee and trade war stories. GS seems like a real far out dude too. Nickpapageorgio might provide some interesting conversation. Mike(in MD i think) and CarrieAnn too.”

We could create a Hannibal Lechter style anit-REIC kryptonite shock wave that would spread for miles depending on the number of beers. :)

 
 
Comment by measton
2012-05-04 08:36:28

Who needs a legal system. Corporate America has set up a system of Arbitration where they control the arbitrator and the release of news about their wrong doing. What could go wrong?

finance.yahoo.com/news/wall-streets-legal-magic-ends-230024311.html

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-05-04 09:41:19

Are you saying there is something wrong with Corporate Communist Capitalism?

That’s just damn hippie terraeest talk!

Comment by goon squad
2012-05-04 09:55:46

The Masters Of The Universe, doing “God’s work” do not care for your uppity attitude, filthy peasant. Now get back to work and spin that hamster wheel faster!

Comment by Northeaster
2012-05-04 10:26:38

at least the hampsters are getting exercise…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2012-05-04 12:30:22

a posted an article that has not showed up yet.

apparently Chicago Federal Reserve president Charles Evans is advocating a “nominal GDP targeting” strategy.

has anyone read about it?

Goldman Sachs apparently likes the idea and we know what that means.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2012-05-04 12:40:08

Banks May Have to Disclose Profits From ECB Emergency Loans
By Ben Moshinsky - May 4, 2012 5:27 AM ET
Bloomberg

Banks may have to disclose profits from carry trades derived from 1 trillion euros ($1.3 trillion) in European Central Bank loans and exclude the money from bonus pools, under draft proposals from European Union lawmakers.

Profit from carry trades, where investors borrow money at a low interest rate to buy higher yielding securities, “should not count toward computation of remuneration and bonus pools” at banks, under plans being weighed by European Union lawmakers, according to a document obtained by Bloomberg News. The measure is one of dozens of proposed amendments to legislation to implement global capital and liquidity rules for EU lenders.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-03/banks-may-have-to-disclose-profits-from-ecb-emergency-loans.html

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 12:50:08

Chant heard at a May Day protest:

Wells Fargo, what the f—-!
We bailed you out and you still suck!

You can substitute the name of your least-favorite bank for WF and chant away. Have fun!

Comment by EnglishmanInNJ
2012-05-04 14:23:39

Ha, this is great. Think I’ll try it at work today.

Will let you know how it owrks out for me Slim.

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2012-05-04 16:09:11

Hmmm…. what rhymes with Citi?

 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-05-04 13:29:39

Another housing bear turned non-bear (I will refrain from calling him a bull):

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-04/pimco-housing-bear-kiesel-says-it-s-time-to-start-buying.html

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-05-04 19:54:53

Nope.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2012-05-04 13:43:59

Adam Yauch of the Beastie Boys Dies

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/adam-yauch-of-the-beastie-boys-dies/

This is weird. These guys are superheroes that never die.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 18:59:06

You gotta fight…for your right…to paaarrrtttyyy!

Isn’t that a succinct version of the Declaration of Independence?

RIP MCA

Comment by Muggy
2012-05-04 19:13:05

In… maybe 2002? I was in Sam Ash Midtown and he was politely expressing frustration at a sales guy over a busted sound card not being re-ordered.

The whole time I was thinking, “Man, if the Beasties can’t get service, I am screwed.”

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2012-05-04 13:47:13

On life and death:

“In early June 2011, Capitol Land Trust acquired a 34- acre property on the northeastern shore of Totten Inlet on the Steamboat Island Peninsula… The project was originally championed by local resident and south Sound conservationist Gayle Broadbent-Ferris… “Gayle, more than anyone, would have been thrilled to know the property is now under conservancy,” Laurence said.”

http://griffinneighbors.blogspot.com/2011/07/conservation-of-pocket-estuary.html

 
Comment by EnglishmanInNJ
2012-05-04 14:22:34

OK, at the risk of making myself unpopular….here I go:

So, if you have a beef with your broker it HAS to go to arbitration.

Well, just do what you do if the price of anything is too high for you. Don’t buy any. Ever.

Quite frankly, the vast majority of people should NOT own stocks anyway. The whole system is rigged against them. From disclosure (or lack thereof), to out-and-out lies (later “restated” if caught out), to getting raped on the price when both buying and selling, I can practically guarantee you will not make any money, in real terms, buying stocks, unless you are lucky.

Think about it, who can read a balance sheet unless you are specifically trained to do so? And then, have expertize in that particular area of business. I’m trained at both degree level and in specific industry knowledge to read financial statements and I will be totally honest and admit that I cannot properly understand my own company’s 10K’s and annual statements. And often the bits that are unclear to me are very big in nature……..$5BN in Tier One Capital represented as “Goodwill” anyone? And it’s been there on the statement for FOUR YEARS…..in violation of GAAP and FASBY.

And then, ha ha, should you get lucky and make money it’s counted as taxable income!!!

C’mon everyone, with the exeption maybe of Polly, who among us can really understand the real business or financial position of any company? Who among us has heard of the term “The Big Bath”? And no, it doesn’t refer to something you can sink into after a long day at work!!

DO NOT BUY STOCKS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD!!!

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-05-04 15:01:31

EnglishmanInNJ, you’re a man after mine own heart. You’ve pretty well summed up why most of my portfolio is NOT in stocks.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-05-04 15:42:32

I’m lucky. I work for a 1%er (who got his money the old fashioned way, built up a company from the ground up, then sold it to a Multi-National and retired ….. :) ….)

My 401K (besides being fully vested and a 1-1 match on any money invested from Day 1), is run by the outfit that does his personal portfolio.

They sent a couple of guys out to the shop, to brief me on the plan, and to see what my tolerance for “risk” was.

My first question was “What is a “safe” investment?”

I then invested all of my money in the riskiest bets possible. Told them that it was the only way I saw to get ahead, and if things tanked and I lost it all, well, I’m in the poorhouse now as it is…..

(-fixr speaking as he selects funds to invest in: “C’mon dice, Baby needs new shoes……..)

Comment by Patrick
2012-05-04 19:32:58

During the first Depression many millionaires emerged by having bought shares so cheaply. They were often called wise investors !

Can I borrow your dice ?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 20:30:31

During the first Depression many millionaires emerged by having bought shares so cheaply.

IIRC, one guy bought one share of every stock on the NYSE that was below 10$ during the depths of the crash, and made a fortune. Of course, he was some insider stockbroker type.

 
 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-05-04 19:20:07

DO NOT BUY STOCKS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD!!!

So you’re saying DCA?

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-05-04 20:04:32

Wow…just wow.

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000088447

I’m speechless.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-05-04 20:18:59

And the exact opposite of Vanilla Ice…Charlie Munger:

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000088395

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post