June 14, 2012

A Bidding War Epidemic

The City Wire reports from Arkansas. “A May 11 ruling from U.S. District Court Judge J. Leon Holmes is expected to unplug a bottleneck of foreclosure filings that began in the fall of 2011 when a bankruptcy court ruling essentially halted the sale of foreclosed homes. ‘The immediate problem with the ruling is that some people who purchased homes that had been foreclosed upon were in limbo,’ said Ethan Nobles, association executive with the Benton-Bryant Realtors. ‘A lot of inventory was stacking up as banks impacted by the ruling weren’t sure how to proceed. All in all, the reversal of the court’s decision in the case should get inventory moving again and that’s good news for a housing market that is dealing with more than its fair share of issues.’”

The Times Record in Arkansas. “Sandy Pyles with Caldwell Banker First Booneville said investors who deal in foreclosure property can turn a significant profit, though there are risks. Pyles said banks that find themselves left with unwanted property can lower the price on it, something the owner, required to make enough from a sale to pay off a loan on the property, cannot do.”

“‘There’s a lot more to come,’ Pyles said of foreclosed homes. ‘Every county in the area has quite a few.’ She said smaller towns tend to have high numbers of foreclosures. ‘Maybe it’s because of the jobs.’”

The Dallas Morning News in Texas. “While local home foreclosures remain high by historical standards, last year they were down more than a third from the peak in 2008, a close look at foreclosures by The Dallas Morning News finds. But a troubling increase in foreclosure filings here during the last two months has given analysts pause. ‘There is still a heck a lot of inventory out there they haven’t done anything with,’ said George Roddy, CEO of Foreclosure Listing Service. ‘I expect foreclosure filings to be higher for the rest of the year — there’s no doubt about that.’”

“‘The banks aren’t picking up things that fast,’ said Dr. James Gaines, an economist with the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University. ‘They are also being careful. They have figured out if we don’t flood the market with these properties all at once, we will do better.’”

“North Texas home sales soared in May to the highest level in four years. Real estate agents say that demand for homes in some neighborhoods is outstripping the supply. ‘We’re seeing multiple offers’ on some properties, said agent Lydia Player of Ebby Halliday Realtors. ‘Buyers want to take advantage of the low prices and low interest rates. But the inventory is down, and there isn’t as much to choose from,’ Player said. ‘This market has changed almost overnight.’”

The Austin American Statesman in Texas. “The Central Texas housing market has turned in sellers’ favor, with homes going to the swift, multiple offers making a comeback and prices creeping higher, local real estate agents and housing experts say. ‘It’s nuts out there,’ said Cyndy Stewart, the lead agent for Redfin in Austin. Of the 25 or so offers she has written in the past six weeks, almost all have been multiple offer situations, Stewart said.”

“‘There are typically three to four offers ahead of us,’ Stewart said. ‘We’re literally waiting our turn in line. And now we’re seeing prices creep up. We’re having to compete above list price, and sometimes we’re not winning those deals.’”

“A Steiner Ranch house priced at $515,000 sold in four days, before real estate agent Robin Curle even listed it in the Central Texas database of homes for sale. ‘Buyers feel like they better act now while they can get prices at the bottom of the market,’ Curle said.”

“The low inventory — the board said Austin had about a 4.4-month supply last month, 2.3 months less than last April — is at the root of the region’s ‘bidding war epidemic,’ said Rachel Musiker, a spokeswoman for Redfin.”

From KDFW in Texas. “Five major banks are shelling out more than $25 billion to help clean up the housing mess. It is the largest consumer financial protection settlement in history. The settlement should help millions of homeowners and Texas is getting a windfall. ‘The top box is for Goodwill,’ said Karen Sartell, pointing to a stack of boxes. The Arlington woman is packing up and moving out. She no longer owns her home. She says to avoid foreclosure she was forced to give it back to her mortgage company after falling behind on her payments.”

“‘Morally this is so wrong,’ Sartell said. ‘They have a legal license to steal. That equity is all that I had.’”

“Homeowners who were foreclosed on between January 2008 and December 2011 may qualify for a pay out. The banks will be forced to shell out $ 1.5 billion to homeowners who lost their homes during that time. That won’t help homeowners like Sartell who lost her home in 2012. Her only hope is that lawmakers in Austin will use the $134 million to help Texas homeowners.”

“‘I think they should do what is right. Use it for what it was meant for. Wake up people. You are screwing with the American people,’ Sartell said.”

The San Antonio Express News in Texas. “As the Federal Reserve slowly begins to interpret and enforce the Dodd-Frank Act reforming the banking industry, some community bankers are beginning to urge even more reform for the nation’s largest banks by restoring the Banking Act of 1933 often referred to as the Glass-Steagall Act.”

“Under Glass-Steagall, the general idea was for commercial banks to take deposits, pay premiums to insure them and make money by charging higher interest rates on consumer and business loans than it paid for deposits. Through the decades, banks gradually won more freedom to invest in companies and stocks, in effect taking ownership positions in companies. Banks also edged their way into riskier kinds of stocks and bonds, seeking bigger profits using depositors’ money.”

“By the time the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was enacted, officially removing many of the barriers between commercial banking and investment companies, Glass-Steagall mostly had dissolved anyway. Now, retired San Antonio banker Tom Frost is calling for the return of Glass-Steagall. He did so in a Wall Street Journal opinion article after testifying to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.”

“‘Financial institutions which provide primarily investment, hedging and speculative services’ should not have the safety net of federally insured deposits, Frost told the Senate panel. ‘I would suggest the two types of institutions have separate ownership, separate management, separate regulation,’ he added.”

“Can Glass-Steagall be resurrected? No, Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President and CEO Richard Fisher said in San Antonio this week. ‘You can’t stuff the genie back in the bottle,’ Fisher said.”

“Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc. CEO Dick Evans said this week he agrees with Frost, who once headed the company. Evans said he initially supported the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ‘because I believe in capitalism.’ What he didn’t realize then, Evans said, is that the large banks that landed into financial difficulties because of too-risky investments ‘would not be allowed to fail,’ resulting in a taxpayer bailout.”

The Santa Fe New Mexican. “The messy, long-running Thornburg Mortgage lawsuit could be coming to an end — but it’s dependent on whether thousands of shareholders of the bankrupt company are ready to accept a settlement of the litigation.”

“Garrett Thornburg came to Santa Fe in 1982 to start a mutual fund that evolved into the Thornburg Companies. The firms Thornburg Mortgage and Thornburg Investment Management are separate entities and the investment company that manages domestic and foreign stock and bond funds continues to thrive. But the mortgage company was highly leveraged, and as home values dropped and the credit crunch intensified in 2008, the company could no longer borrow money. The stock price of Thornburg Mortgage dropped from almost $30 per share to about 5 cents per share.”

“The settlement fund consists of $2 million in cash, and if a settlement can be arranged, former common and preferred stock shareholders would receive about one penny per damaged share.”




RSS feed

81 Comments »

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-06-14 06:16:56

I was on the losing side of 2 bidding wars last summer. Well, I didn’t so much lose as I declined to participate. Result was the same, house I wanted to buy was bought by someone else who paid more.

The house I did end up buying, I did participate in the bidding war and ended up with the house.

Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-06-14 08:51:42

“I did participate in the bidding war and ended up with the house.”

Hey….. it’s your funeral.

Comment by Blue Skye
2012-06-14 12:12:07

Not a funeral, 30 years to contemplate why he did that.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-06-14 13:16:01

I pay less for my mortgage than I did in rent, for a better house with more land.

Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-06-14 13:31:21

And you’re underwater. That’s your problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jingle male
2012-06-14 16:33:44

RAS you’re crass….and an idiot.

 
Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-06-14 17:17:05

Looky here JingleBalls….. If you want rah rah, you’re wrong place. Maybe go check out trulia…. You’ll fit right in there.

 
Comment by Mugsy
2012-06-15 04:14:06

Besides being underwater you get to pay exorbitant Texas real estate taxes and you’ll need to set up an escrow fund for the numerous repairs you’ll have the pleasure of making in the near future. Central Texas is harsh on homes. I owned in Austin twice and a lot of things had to be done to my homes after 2-3 years.

 
Comment by jinglemale
2012-06-15 04:26:44

RAS, I like contributing here and it is quite fun to watch you make a fool of yourself.

 
Comment by HowMuchaMonth?®
2012-06-15 05:03:33

JingleBalls, I like calling out liars on their lies and it’s quite fun identifying you as a liar.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 06:43:13

“The Times Record in Arkansas.

‘There’s a lot more to come,’ Pyles said of foreclosed homes. ‘Every county in the area has quite a few.’ She said smaller towns tend to have high numbers of foreclosures. ‘Maybe it’s because of the jobs.’”

Luckily, this story is about Arkansas. It’s different here in California.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 08:39:52

Maybe it’s because of the jobs.

Ya think?

Comment by jingle male
2012-06-14 16:35:21

Yeah, there are even fewer jobs in CA….11.2% unemployment…

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 06:55:32

“Five major banks are shelling out more than $25 billion to help clean up the housing mess. It is the largest consumer financial protection settlement in history. The settlement should help millions of homeowners and Texas is getting a windfall.

That won’t help homeowners like Sartell who lost her home in 2012. Her only hope is that lawmakers in Austin will use the $134 million to help Texas homeowners.”

I find this article extremely challenging to follow. For instance, how did the ‘Texas windfall’ share of $25 billion spontaneously dwindle down to $134 million? Given that Texas is one of the largest states, I’m thinking the homeowner bailout looks far more paltry in other states where households need bailouts.

(Grade school maths:

$134,000,000/$25,000,000,000 X 100% = 0.536%)

Comment by X-GSfixr
2012-06-14 11:27:05

So, it has morphed from a “penalty” to “shelling out”?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 06:57:53

“As the Federal Reserve slowly begins to interpret and enforce the Dodd-Frank Act reforming the banking industry, some community bankers are beginning to urge even more reform for the nation’s largest banks by restoring the Banking Act of 1933 often referred to as the Glass-Steagall Act.”

Given the plethora of influence peddlers who shuffle back and forth between Wall Street and K Street, how is this even remotely possible?

Comment by snake charmer
2012-06-14 07:12:20

It has zero chance of happening and both major political parties are dead-set against it. It could, and should, be raised as a question in one of this fall’s non-debate “debates” between the presidential candidates, but I already can hear the evasive answers: “we need to grow the economy” … “regulation kills jobs” … “savvy businessmen” … blah blah blah. Shut up.

Comment by Neuromance
2012-06-14 09:02:56

The farce will continue till it negatively impacts a majority of voters. It will not end till then.

Comment by BetterRenter
2012-06-14 11:22:59

I’m even more pessimistic, Neuro. To wit:

‘A lot of inventory was stacking up as banks impacted by the ruling weren’t sure how to proceed.’

It’s amazing still how people just accept this propaganda.

The bankers had no trouble whatsoever allocating resources in a market that was rising and when there were profits. But when the market falls and there are losses, we’d expected to believe they don’t know what to do? There are many thousands of pages of regulations and procedures, all written by thousands of employees in the finance industry, and by thousands of officials in the regulatory agencies. They are lying to us; they have more than enough instructions and tools to do the job. And funding. PARTICULARLY funding.

We’re sheep. The Housing Balloon is still here, full strength, with all of its consequences. At this rate, without rightful and deleterious consequences visiting the material actors in it, we’ll never get rid of it. I see now that Fannie and Freddie and other such agencies are probably just preludes to outright nationalization of housing. This will take place before 2030 AD.

I’m so glad that I own my house outright. But I’m very, very worried that owners will be usurped by an invasive set of government agencies as a part of the outright nationalization.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 11:40:17

The bankers had no trouble whatsoever allocating resources in a market that was rising and when there were profits. But when the market falls and there are losses, we’d expected to believe they don’t know what to do? There are many thousands of pages of regulations and procedures, all written by thousands of employees in the finance industry, and by thousands of officials in the regulatory agencies. They are lying to us; they have more than enough instructions and tools to do the job. And funding. PARTICULARLY funding.

Not only that, they’re trying to tell us that they keep losing paperwork. Come on. They’re businesses. And one of the things you learn when you first go to work in the business world is that proper handling of paperwork is VERY important.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 20:14:32

It already negatively impacts a majority of voters; just not the top 1% who pay campaign contributions for both parties’ candidates.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 07:00:20

“‘Financial institutions which provide primarily investment, hedging and speculative services’ should not have the safety net of federally insured deposits, Frost told the Senate panel. ‘I would suggest the two types of institutions have separate ownership, separate management, separate regulation,’ he added.”

Investment = casino gambling

Hedging = heads we win, tails you lose

Speculative services = taking high-risk gambles with the expectation of a bailout in case they don’t pay off

“Can Glass-Steagall be resurrected? No, Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President and CEO Richard Fisher said in San Antonio this week. ‘You can’t stuff the genie back in the bottle,’ Fisher said.”

Why not give it the old college try?

Comment by oxide
2012-06-14 07:13:47

They stuffed the genie back in the bottle in 1933, didn’t they? Of course, back then they had bread lines and Grapes-of-Wrath style images instead of food stamps, and real reporters to show those images instead of bubble-headed bleach blondes on the evening cable news.

And back then we had honest-to-goodness telephone-book filibusters instead of Citizens United.

Comment by 2banana
2012-06-14 08:09:35

We also had a government that took a fraction of the GDP in taxes compared to today.

We also didn’t have a government that bribed it voters with free benefits and free sh*t.

We also didn’t have a government that bribed it bankers with free benefits and free sh*t.

And we didn’t public union thugs.

Kinda makes it easier - don’t you think?

Comment by snake charmer
2012-06-14 08:26:33

Can you write a housing-related post without referring to non-existent “union thugs”? It makes you sound like a paranoid.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 08:41:45

I can’t wait to tell my mother that she’s a retired public union thug. (She taught in the public schools for 22 years.)

And, dual bananas, I hope you never meet up with my mother. ‘Cause she’ll whup ya one!

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2012-06-14 09:59:15

In a word: No. 2be must have a program that inserts the words “union thug” randomly into every post.

Slim, I think I would like your mother. :)

 
Comment by 2banana
2012-06-14 10:24:49

Hey - I met this banker.

Really nice guy. Donates alot of time and money to charities. He even loves his mother.

Does that make the whole FIRE industry all fuzzy wuzzy?

No, it is still corrupt to the bone, will bankrupt America and needs to be reformed.

————————–

Union President’s Email Tells Members to Get ‘Everyone We Know to Vote For Democrats
Capitol Confidential | 6/13/2012 | Tom Gantert

A union president of school employees sent an email that appears to be from her work email asking school employees to get “everyone we know to vote for Democrats.”

“You might want to share this with your membership. This is what an EFM can do once they take over a district. This is the future for public education in Michigan with a Republican Governor and legislature. If our members do not get out to vote in November, we have no one to blame but ourselves for not voting and getting everyone we know to vote for Democrats.”

 
Comment by michael
2012-06-14 10:50:39

“Hey - I met this banker.

Really nice guy. Donates alot of time and money to charities. He even loves his mother.

Does that make the whole FIRE industry all fuzzy wuzzy?

No, it is still corrupt to the bone, will bankrupt America and needs to be reformed.”

good one.

 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2012-06-14 07:53:14

Some parts of that law made no sense.

Banks confined to one state? Banks allowed to underwrite loans, but not corporate bonds?

The crux of the problem is banks speculating in the markets, and making money by winning zero sum bets with no economic purpose, which is what all those derivative contracts are.

That is what the Volker rule is designed to stop. That is what the banks are fighting to keep.

Comment by Blue Skye
2012-06-14 12:17:19

When I was younger, banks were confined to One County (NJ).

 
Comment by BetterRenter
2012-06-14 12:22:46

Fighting, WTE? That implies exertion. There’s none of that sweaty exercise going on. Bankers sashay into the Congress and pass a few jokes and anecdotes back and forth with the panel members they are allegedly testifying to, like they are old friends… BECAUSE THEY ARE OLD FRIENDS.

The bankers have strong allies all through the government. There’s no conflict worth mentioning. Paulson bailed out the bankers with free government cheese as easy as a detachment of SEALS invading Bikini Bottom, taking Spongebob hostage. The bankers took us over as easily as a squad of Marines taking over a grade school in Connecticut. Fight? Who can call that sort of thing a fight?

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2012-06-14 07:03:11

A Steiner Ranch house priced at $515,000 sold in four days

I wonder if this is the house? If not, I’m sure it’s very similar. The satellite image of Steiner ranch shows a hundred identical houses.

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/12109-Rayo-De-Luna-Ln-Austin-TX-78732/64513822_zpid/

Current Zestimate: $472K
2011 Tax assess: $422K
June 4: Listed $515K

2003 5/4 4000 sq ft on .22 acre. Fairly cookie cutter McMansion. Giant footprint, so there is very little yard. I don’t know much about the climate there, but a two-story home with big windows and narrow eaves on a comparatively small lot doesn’t sound like a good idea in any part of Texas.

[and how do they get such small yards? My one-story house is 1580 sq ft. Their 2-story house is 4000 square feet. We have the same size lot. Yet, this house has almost no lawn, while mine takes me 45 minutes to mow.]

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 07:07:30

“A Steiner Ranch house priced at $515,000 sold in four days

Current Zestimate: $472K”

$43,000 underwater in a heart beat…

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2012-06-14 07:10:33

That’s a good find; I bet that is it. Notice the annual tax bill of over 11k. It shows a rent zestimate of 3.4k/month. Ha!

‘how do they get such small yards?’

Because the developers make all the rules in Central Texas.

 
Comment by Bad Andy
2012-06-14 07:10:38

In my neck of the woods you can tell when a house was built just by the size. The stuff built in the 1970’s and 1980’s is small and those people seem to have endless lots. The stuff built in the 1990’s is typically bigger with more architectural details but still plenty of room to roam. Anything built after about 2002 is stupid. People have 4,500 square foot McMansions that make the lot they’re on seem like zero lot line suburbia…and we have 1.16 to 1.5 acre lots!

 
Comment by salinasron
2012-06-14 07:53:46

“Yet, this house has almost no lawn, while mine takes me 45 minutes to mow.” Dah! Sounds like you have an 85 yr old rehab mowing fer ya. Here in Cally a mow and blow lawn operation would pull up with 2-4 illegals and be gone in 15 minutes tops.

 
Comment by The_Overdog
2012-06-14 07:55:18

Large lawns are like jacuzzi tubs. everyone thinks they want one until they actually get one, and they spend more time maintaining it that actually using it.

Look behind that house - tons of native land, which blows the doors of of a lawn in terms of beauty and maintenance.

Comment by Ben Jones
2012-06-14 08:09:14

I owned and lived on 12 acres south of Austin years ago. It was great, I couldn’t even hear the neighbors, watch deer and foxes running around.

‘Look behind that house - tons of native land’

Used to be native land where those houses are too. You gotta have roads so the workers can get to town and earn enough to pay for that monstrosity. And when they sell out, they might build on that empty, unproductive native land. IMO, these developments have ruined the hill country.

Comment by The_Overdog
2012-06-14 09:05:37

I think these developments are just a symptom of Texans’ love (or crappy laws, who knows which?) for sprawl, so I agree that it’s ruined the hill country, but people like the hills and have to live somewhere. Austin seems to be happy turning itself into the next Houston or Dallas.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bad Andy
2012-06-14 10:53:30

Dallas never bothered me as much as Houston. I still vividly remember my last trip there. Highways where lanes suddenly end or take you somewhere you don’t want to be and sprawl as far as the eye can see. Yuck!

 
Comment by snake charmer
2012-06-14 13:55:39

A frustrated Houstonian once joked with me that he was convinced a conspiracy existed to block off every entrance and exit into the downtown area. Just flying into the city, I’ve never seen so much concrete, with the exception of L.A., where I’ve read that one-third of all surface area is paved in some way.

 
 
 
Comment by Montana
2012-06-14 08:29:04

I hate our lawn! I would love nothing better than to let half of it go back to long meadowgrass, but I’m not sure I can get there from here. Anyone ever try doing that with the usual bluegrass/fescue/quackgrass/dandilion mix?

Comment by Ben Jones
2012-06-14 08:31:17

Yeah, just stop cutting it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Montana
2012-06-14 12:42:53

Nope, went and looked into it. Noxious weeds will take over..got to strip everything off first, then plant meadow grass and fight weeds for a couple years. We’re too old to deal with all that.

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2012-06-14 14:15:50

Montana, look into smothering the lawn instead of stripping it. Waaaay less work. Save up your newspapers and junk mail. Lay them over an area of lawn, water the paper, then spread stuff over it: leaves, grass clippings, wood chips, bark mulch, compost, whatever (no meat, oil or dairy stuff though; think of it as a giant open-air compost bin). Let it marinate for a few months. Then you can plant stuff. If you want the process to go faster, cover the grass with black plastic until it dies.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 08:43:52

Many years ago, my father developed a major hatred for the front and back lawns. So, away went the grass, and in went the ivy and pachysandra.

Forty-some years later, ivy and pachy are still going strong. My dad, even in his addled state, has no regrets about the lawn terminator move.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2012-06-14 10:04:55

I’ve been pulling ivy out of my landscaping ever since some landscape architect talked me into having it planted. It had to be trimmed at least monthly. Am substituting pachysandra, which is more well-behaved and easier to rake the leaves out.

The lawn is steadily shrinking as I convert a part into a garden every year. This year we have beans, peas and lettuce in raised beds that used to be lawn. Much more useful, and more interesting too. My eventual goal is to eliminate the lawn altogether. That should keep me busy for another dozen years or so!

 
Comment by oxide
2012-06-14 11:42:54

I’m on the same track as you, only a LOT slower. I stupidly bought a book “The Backyard Landscaper” (1992) with sketches of different ways to do a backyard — pools, food gardens, play sets, low maintenance…. All the plans had one thing in common: every plan had replaced a third of the lawn with either hardscape or mulched planting beds.

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2012-06-14 14:19:17

I have been working on my property for 22 years, and I still have plenty of lawn that could be replaced, on 0.2 acre. If I ever ‘finish’ I probably won’t know what to do with myself. Start over with a different plan maybe (not that there ever was any actual ‘plan’).

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-06-14 15:58:56

When ever I start my engines to leave the dock, the grass below gets a trim, without a thought.

I do appreciate the natural marsh behind me and am glad that it’s a game preserve. The best way to maintain something is not to carry it on your back.

Not to depreciate all you joyful lawnmower pushers and earth diggers, but it’s cruising season!

It’s ironic, don’t you think, that some of our highest aspirations are to do field work, for free, in our spare time.

 
Comment by Patrick
2012-06-14 18:45:57

Blue Skye

Are you docked on the American side of Lake Ontario? Near?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2012-06-15 05:26:13

Yes, but I spend the summer on the Canadian side.

 
 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2012-06-14 10:09:10

You may have to get rid of the fescue mix and start over. You can do it a little at a time. The grass can be smothered with newspaper and junk mail. Throw some pine bark mulch and compost on top of that, let it cook for a while, and then you can plant whatever you want there, with very little digging.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-06-14 08:59:54

“Large lawns are like jacuzzi tubs. everyone thinks they want one until they actually get one, and they spend more time maintaining it that actually using it. ”

Not really.

I have several acres. Only about 1/2 an acre is a manicured lawn. That 1/2 is the only part that needs regular maintenance. I mow it which takes me 1 to 1.5 hrs a week. The rest is jut wild grasses that needs mowing once or twice a year. Guys with tractors will do it for a $200-300 a pop.

My closest neighbors are about 1000 feet away and the road is 750 feet away (which means an hour with the snow blower on the driveway after a big storm in the winter). Well worth the extra expense and time to have that kind of elbow room and quite around me.

Comment by The_Overdog
2012-06-14 09:10:37

I’m only 5′10″. I don’t need that much elbow room. I grew up on that much land, and my dad didn’t pay me anywhere near $300 to mow it. Talk about inflation!

Different strokes for different folks though. After growing up in BFE, I don’t have that much love for empty open spaces anymore. Maybe if I had some hobbies that tend towards noisy or illegal I’ll be buying some land out in the sticks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-06-14 10:47:06

I’m in a country setting, but less than a 10 minute drive, over the mountain, to a suburb with all the city things…mall, movie theaters, schools, grocery stores, parks, doctors offices, etc.

Bet of both worlds…secluded but close to stuff.

 
 
Comment by Montana
2012-06-14 12:45:21

That’s the way to do it. Keep a small mowed lawn around the house, the rest in long grass. Unfortunately that wasn’t the style when mine was put in (circa 1980).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-06-14 10:02:45

When I want a floozy in a jacuzzi, the Mrs and I rent one for the night.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 10:20:59

You can rent those too? Or do you just go to a hotel with in-room jacuzzis?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-06-14 13:06:12

lmao….. just me, the floozy and the jacuzzi.

 
 
 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-06-14 11:13:17

I’ve been trying to get a lawn going in my little urban backyard rental and I am officially giving up as of today: the water bill came yesterday and they have increased the water rates again (SFH rental means we pay all utilities).

I’ll still have to water my veggies and flowers, but paying for a lawn is too much, or at least until we can buy a house and install a grey water system. A friend recently took a class on how to do this and promises that it’s not too hard and she will teach me. Our landlord is a nervous nelly so I won’t even bother asking her if I can mess with the plumbing.

So now I will troll craigslist until find some cool free rocks to create some sort of rock garden.

 
 
Comment by Mugsy
2012-06-15 04:21:30

Steiner Ranch is nothing but tract homes. Expensive tract homes but tract hone nonetheless.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2012-06-14 07:05:35

“The settlement fund consists of $2 million in cash, and if a settlement can be arranged, former common and preferred stock shareholders would receive about one penny per damaged share.”

Trickle-down economics in action…

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 08:44:52

So much for investing in stocks for the long run.

Comment by 2banana
2012-06-14 10:26:51

You could go with bonds, they used to be pretty save and FIRST in line if there is a bankruptcy - unless the company is taken over by obama in order to save the UAW.

Then you get nothing too.

Comment by Mugsy
2012-06-15 04:22:45

Long run = 3 months till next bubble appears.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Malfunction Junction
2012-06-14 11:09:25

It’s nice to see evidence of bidding wars in print. I tried to contact a realtor about a quadriplex in Miami earlier this week. He wont even return my calls…Clearly, its time to hold off and continue stacking up cash reserves until we get a sea change in trading conditions.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 11:34:02

I can still remember the Tucson house bidding wars in 2003 and 2004.

Only reason I got the Arizona Slim Ranch nailed down in late ‘04 was that this nabe, located in Tucson’s much-reviled 85705 zip code, wasn’t considered to be that desirable.

Although that’s beginning to change, ‘05 still has some pretty bad areas. Go west of Stone Avenue, which is near here and you’ll see what I mean.

Back to the bidding war thing. Around here, they came to a screeching halt in the summer of 2005. Suddenly, there was a proliferation of “for sale” signs. Some of those signs stayed up for years.

So, I’m of the mind that this bidding war phase is just a phase. Unleash the hounds of pent-up shadow inventory…

Comment by oxide
2012-06-14 11:48:47

Phase or no, I’m glad I bought. I could easily have spent $70K in rent waiting for the release of said hounds. And by that point, what’s left may not be worth fighting over.

Comment by Blue Skye
2012-06-14 16:46:25

I’m sure you will make out fine. Your corner of the universe is pretty much built on nothing can go wrong and things will stay like they are for a long long long time. Really, sincerely. And there has to be something in life that promises permanence, or we freak.

Still, you didn’t buy. You borrowed and promised to pay. It is probably just semantics to you. To me it is very real, having hit the speed bumps at speed. I don’t recommend it.

Nothing personal, but the 10s and 10s of millions who do as you will be the death of all of us. Buy what you can’t pay for and let tomorrow take care of itself. It’s a national/global philosophy and it doesn’t just shut out of the market those who won’t go into debt slavery, it supports the biggest credit bubble in history, which has become a vital agenda of nations to expand, on credit, and will bankrupt our children and their children.

I’m supporting your decision to borrow large (imaging to make a veritable killing), by paying your interest through dilution of our currency and obligation for future taxes to make your deal of a lifetime possible. It is a bill that will continue to arrive long past my time here. So when you say your are glad, my reaction is that you are glad that you are contributing to effing over my children.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by HowMuchaMonth?®
2012-06-14 19:04:43

“You borrowed and promised to pay.”

And right there is the #1 problem with the entire thing. And personally, I’ll be God damned before I ever agree to pay $500k for a $250k loan. Not that need to….. it’s the principle of it all. People don’t think….. they’re all about howmuchamonth and that makes for a crowded, inflated trade for responsible people.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by BetterRenter
2012-06-14 12:43:25

‘Morally this is so wrong,’ Sartell said. ‘They have a legal license to steal. That equity is all that I had.’

This is the big, big problem that’s rising, folks. People used to believe that they had to pay for what they wanted. Now housing is becoming more and more viewed as some sort of ‘civil right’ in the USA.

If one of the best vetted contractual processes in the United States is believed to be a “license to steal”, then we’re really looking at the beginning of the end of real private property in the nation.

I believe now that Fannie’s and Freddie’s dominance of the housing market is the beginning of the new order in viewing what private property is: Really a long-term lease from the government. Both major parties have been looking for a way to exert direct control over our financial lives. This is one way they will do it.

One thing that’s likely to happen is the imposition of a national property tax, or an “imputed rent” tax; the same thing, really. That will be designed to subvert those bastards (like me) who tried to dodge renting and lenders.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-06-14 15:21:15

I believe now that Fannie’s and Freddie’s dominance of the housing market is the beginning of the new order in viewing what private property is: Really a long-term lease from the government.

It already is a long-term lease from the government. Just stop paying your property taxes. You’ll find out who really owns your property.

Comment by 2banana
2012-06-14 15:54:44

Public unions?

;-)

Comment by BetterRenter
2012-06-15 09:56:04

Well, the bite of property taxes fuels a LOT of parasites, not just the mass of county and city employees who gather their big paychecks, huge benefits and gargantuan pensions off of them. Basically, property taxes fuel union goons, the civil engineering (construction) mafia, a variety of crony contractors, and finally all those “professionals” like a ‘county health director’ who can’t get a real job otherwise to save their lives. Our local property taxes also empower a public transit system of buses which is one of the biggest welfare cases, ever; fares only cover less than 20% of the operating costs of the system.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by BetterRenter
2012-06-15 09:43:36

Yes, AS. I already know about feudal title. But property taxes can be turned off, although North Dakota opted not to do so. Once that happens, you really can’t be kicked off your land unless eminent domain comes along.

 
 
 
Comment by Malfunction Junction
2012-06-14 18:46:49

“I had one last month that had 62 offers,” said Marta DuPree, an agent for Keyes in South Florida. “I had one the other day that had 12 offers. It’s very challenging for buyers.”

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/realestate/fl-realtytrac-may-foreclosures-broward-20120614,0,5365718.story

Comment by HowMuchaMonth?®
2012-06-14 19:25:20

wow…… another herd of suckers.

How many times they going to open the feed lot?

Comment by BetterRenter
2012-06-15 09:46:22

I think the False Recovery is officially ON.

They are just a new crop of FBs. The alligators will continue to be fed. Prices are kicked downward by buying and selling, remember. So transaction activity shouldn’t surprise us.

 
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2012-06-14 22:09:27

Curious, isn’t it, how this sudden spate of “urgency” stories coincides with the NRA’s “Rally to Protect the American Dream” and the national realtor’s conference last month.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post