July 6, 2012

Bits Bucket for July 6, 2012

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

208 Comments »

Comment by Muggy DBA
2012-07-06 02:10:15

Lol, Ex, just for you: Florida Realtors will strategically use ®

http://www.floridarealtors.org/AboutFar/AboutUs/Florida-Realtors-Branding.cfm

Comment by SUGuy
2012-07-06 06:28:10

I am working on my own logo “How to bitch slap a realtor”. What a crock they say a lot and mean nothing.

Sorry my anger dealing with these crooks is taking its toll. The games and lies these crooks play is unbelievable.

Comment by combotechie
2012-07-06 06:35:33

“The games and lies these crooks play is unbelievable.”

In this economic climate games and lies is all that’s left.

Comment by combotechie
2012-07-06 06:37:09

An ideal product sells itself. A product less than ideal needs a bit of help.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 07:20:25

“How to bitch slap a realtor” logo by SUGuy

I’m right with you. We just submitted our “Highest & Best” (cash & close for primary), and we’re wondering if our offer is being shopped (within the listing brokerage minimum) for a higher bid. The moral compass in that industry has no limit on the downside.

Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 07:51:31

Ya know, you’re every example why everyone here believes that now is the time NOT to buy. The losses resulting from acting now are massive from which there is no recovery.

So why are you here?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 08:20:56

Pimp Watch
So, are you saying different reasons for buying or timing isn’t OK? I was under the impression we’re not a ” group think” circle of contributors. We have a special set of circumstances in our family. Don’t be so judgmental. We are paying multiple rents and my husband could go blind. Owning free and clear is a must. We’re bleeding our hard earned money. This is our final home. Walk a mile in our shoes. It isn’t a picnic. Lighten up.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:26:15

Some of us are glad you are here, Awaiting! Please don’t let RAL run you off…

Thinking about Awaiting’s situation, it just occurred to me that their purchase decision is a fine example of Bernanke successfully pushing people out of cash and into riskier assets.

Awaiting, if your cash-waiting-for-purchase were earning a reasonable rate of return, and the returns that it was producing were easily covering your rents, then I’m guessing that you would not be feeling nearly the compulsion to buy. I’m not second-guessing your decision—it has to be really hard to watch that cash being eroded by rents in a way that makes owning a depreciating asset seem like the “safe” route. But it does strike me that this is an example of Bernanke winning.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 08:32:34

Riggggggggggght…..

Look. it’s a documentary screenplay called “Raped By A Realtor”.

How many times do you need to watch it?

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 08:37:49

This is our final home.

Everyone’s (financial and personal) situation is different.

In our case: if we buy, we assume it will be our final home. Our rent keeps going up, and if we get another rent increase we won’t be able to save very much. Buying now means renting and PITI are equal. We have seniority in our (yes, public union) jobs and we love where we live.

All that said, we are proceeding extremely cautiously. Refuse to get caught up in any bidding wars, have a serious limit (no more than $2153.00 month PITI) to what we can spend (as set by the city’s Teacher-Next-Door-Program that is giving us some DP assistance), and even though we are going to an up-and-coming neighborhood, won’t buy unless we find a house we love.

So we may wait a while for it to happen, and in that time frame, sheesh, anything could happen, right? Euro collapses, massive inflation, large earthquake in SF, whatever.

Cannot predict the future, but we need a place to live as sure as we need food.

Remain calm and carry on.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:42:48

With secure jobs in a location where you love to live, I can certainly see locking in future housing costs if it were roughly equal to rental costs. Doing so would remove a lot of risk of future housing cost increases, which are certainly possible/likely if you were to rent for the rest of your life. It would also reduce the odds of you having to move due to landlords.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 08:43:00

‘Everyone’s (financial and personal) situation is different.’

Sound familiar folks? :-)

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 08:45:44

Thinking about Awaiting’s situation, it just occurred to me that their purchase decision is a fine example of Bernanke successfully pushing people out of cash and into riskier assets.

A few weeks ago, what should I hear but a-knocking on my door. It was a friend who was sitting on a lot of cash. And she was asking me about a nearby house for sale. She wanted to purchase it as a rental.

I did everything I could, including raising my voice, to try to keep her from buying the place. I don’t know whether my efforts were successful, but at least I tried.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 08:47:15

It would also reduce the odds of you having to move due to landlords.

I hate moving. I also really dislike my landlady. And we like dogs a lot (have two, and one is a Rottie). Try renting with 2 kids and a 100 pound dog.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 08:51:59

Prime
Thank you. I’ve been taking beating on this blog lately. You are right. Our sizable house fund and additional pad should be making us $30K annual interest minimum. We are actually losing money. I only wish Bernanke and the rest of TBTP get their comeuppance.

But in reality, we need our stuff in one place. Life is flying by, and one day it will be our last day. We would like to live a better life. Isn’t that what helped drive oxide’s decision to find her place.

Thank you again Prime and also Bad Chile. It’s lonely on this island.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 08:54:21

What are u waiting for?

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-07-06 09:01:39

“I hate moving. I also really dislike my landlady. And we like dogs a lot (have two, and one is a Rottie). Try renting with 2 kids and a 100 pound dog.”

I have 2 dogs and a cat. FWIW, the two houses I rented in between owning both initially said no pets allowed on the ads. I called them up and the landlords both changed their mind when they got to know who the renters would be. Worst thing that happens if you see a rental you like that says no pets and you call….they say no to the pets. Doesn’t hurt to ask.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-07-06 09:34:25

Doesn’t hurt to ask.

True. Helped us. Our landlord was so tired of knucklehead after knucklehead trying to rent her pad she accepted our dog as a small price to pay to have good stable renters who would treat the place as if we owned it. We put throw rugs down to protect the floors and we keep it to “Pottery Barn catalog” levels of no clutter and cleanliness.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-07-06 10:08:50

Awaiting, I’m going to be blunt.

IMO, I don’t think you don’t have the right to complain about “bleeding” your hard-earned money, when just yesterday you put in a too-high offer on a house which needed an additional $50K of repair!

I tried to walk in your shoes a few months ago. You have a substantial cash cushion. You have a medical situation. You have the prospect of losing most of your income very soon. You have a few options:

1. Continue to rent and bleed and piss that cash away.

2. Spend that entire $400K on a house in California. You will have a house, but you will have nothing else. Do you think you can survive 20 more years on a house and nothing else? With very little income, a disabled spouse, and in a state that is financially and geologically broke?

3. Spend $120K on a nearly IDENTICAL house someplace else in the country, near medium-sized city with a top-notch medical center. You will have a house, but you will also have $300K left over. You could use that cash to live, to help pay for medical, to invest in decreasing your expenses, to stabilize your situation, and to generally lower your stress so you and Mr. Awaiting can enjoy each other’s company.

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 10:52:38

oxide
Thanks for the post. If Mr. Glaucoma
(hubby) can work some, we’ll be OK.

I am not upset with you, my dear oxide.
I appreciate your input. Cyber-hug :)

 
Comment by oxide
2012-07-06 11:26:46

I hope you do well, Awaiting, :-) but I do ask you to at least consider your options.

I’m afraid of two things:

1. You are focusing too hard on buying a house, any house, just to get a house, that you’re liable to bid away your last dime. You might buy something you don’t want, can’t afford, and will regret later, just to “win.”

2. You’re losing bid after bid in CA, I would take that as a sign. “Hubby can work some” in many parts of the country. And with a paid off house and cash cushion, you could get by on Lucky Ducky jobs even if Hubby can’t work some. That’s what I’m thinking of — what if Hubby can’t work some? Then you’d be stuck.

RAL/Pimp is a tough guy to be with on this blog. He seems to think that all houses locations jobs etc are the same nationwide. Brings out the worst in us , don’t it?

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 12:50:30

oxide
I went to the U-San Diego after my initial education and got certified in my sector of Commercial R E.
We have house $ and other $. We will not be broke if this deal goes through and we win this OK home (I’m not drooling), just no dream car in my future.

I appreciate the concern. I like ya and will use your bullet points as a data point.

Say, did you redo the kitchen yet?

 
Comment by oxide
2012-07-06 13:16:41

Heavens no! No kitchen. There’s electrical and plumbing and insulation that I would like to do first. I’m “living within my means” and only getting stuff done when I’ve saved up the cash.

The only bad things about the kitchen are the 70’s flooring and a fridge that might conk any minute. I could fix both with under a thou if I need to. But the kitchen is more than a quick redo. It will be part of a much larger project. That’s the only thing I’d go into HELOC debt for, years from now, maybe.

 
Comment by polly
2012-07-06 14:13:08

Please don’t think of getting the house as “winning.” You may want it and that is fine. You may consider it your best option and that is fine too. But getting the right to pay more for an item than anyone else is willing to pay is purchasing that item, not winning it.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 20:16:05

“RAL/Pimp is a tough guy to be with on this blog. He seems to think that all houses locations jobs etc are the same nationwide. Brings out the worst in us , don’t it?”

Considering Neuromance’s post yesterday. You’re not getting it Oxy.

————————————————————————
Comment by Neuromance
2012-07-05 09:16:51
Creative Destruction.

It is a concept we are forced to accept when businesses restructure, jobs disappear, communities die out. The working classes in the US have been dealing with creative destruction for many decades. It’s an unpleasant but necessary part of life.

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-07-06 22:11:54

Dear Awaiting,

Probably more than anyone else on this blog I sympathize with your situation. Going blind is seriously sucky and requires a stable environment. Here’s what I would do in your situation:

Find the area you want to live in and pinpoint a few houses that aren’t listed but which appeal to you. Then–

Put an ad in the local throw-away paper, on supermarket billboards, in church bulletins,on Craig’s list, in area student papers, ANYWHERE that’s not on the MLS, stating that you’re cash buyers looking for a home, that you don’t want to go through a realtor, and here’s what you’re looking for and willing to pay.
-”Are you thinking about selling your house but don’t want to deal with a realtor?”
-”Tired of the games?”
-”Realtors are Liars. We’re not.”

Then plaster the neighborhood with fliers, handouts, half-page ads, bulk mailings, index cards on door steps, etc. Stress that you’re not looking to make a buck, that you and your husband need to find a home, and that you’ve sterling financial and personal references if the potential sellers are on the level. I’m betting that someone in the area will contact you and offer to work something out. I know I sure would if I were thinking about moving elsewhere….

 
Comment by BetterRenter
2012-07-07 03:34:49

Oxide said: “Awaiting, I’m going to be blunt.”

Good luck with that line of thought, Oxide. You’ll get nowhere with it.

The “Oil City Plan” is just a rhetorical device. Few people want to do that. Such areas are pretty much confined to the Midwest, in which I live. The poster “Awaiting” can get a house here, easy, for $60K. We have pretty good medical facilities here. But she won’t do it. Because this is the “flyover”. Anyone willing to plop down $400K for a house, now, automatically considers Oil City to be an impossible option. If you’re paying $400K for housing, you’re on the coasts. With culture. And jobs. And diversity. And real government. Few people want to give all that up.

So Awaiting’s not going to do it. You’re wasting your breath.

My personal theory is that the housing bubble got so extreme on the coasts is because those coasties were used to expensive housing in the first place. Selling a maroon on 10x income housing, is a lot easier when housing around him was commonly 4-5x income. Awaiting is merely acting out that bias. $400K on a house is normal for her. And she looks around and sees all the things she probably likes, like culture, jobs, government, etc.

I used to live in New England for a time and so I can compare here and there. There’s just no comparison. Sure, I know there’s a life in the Midwest, but that’s invisible from New England, and one might say, impossible to conceive of. Hence the term “flyover”. About the only thing that New Englanders know about the middle of the country (i.e. anything “Westa Woosta”, up to the valleys of California) is that it’s a big barrier that has to be flown over at 500mph for many hours to “get anywhere”.

I don’t hold any of this against Awaiting. It’s cultural programming and no mere discussion will overcome that.

 
 
 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 07:46:48

And its not just you SUguy. Even locally, when these criminals are mentioned, its as though a switch was flipped.

You know a few these cretins are posting on the blog too. Their lies, misconduct and malfeasance is something they seem to think is normal and acceptable. Some are under indictment but not nearly enough.

Be advised narscum employs paid proxies and surrogates whose sole purpose is to misinform everyone here.

Hint: You ought to know who they are by now.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:01:58

You know a few these cretins are posting on the blog too.

Some of our past posters definitely seemed like liars, but I can’t think of any right now that strike me as such. I think you are throwing that label around too liberally, RAL…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SV guy
2012-07-06 09:06:35

Living on the same peninsula as RW gives me an insight as to what he says about our locale is true, at least for the moment.

Everybody knows that in a free market, a truly free market, home prices would seek their natural equilibrium. Which in almost every case, if not every case, means down.

As long as we give control of OUR money supply to someone else we get what we get. Deserved or not.

 
 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 08:40:29

Be advised narscum employs paid proxies and surrogates whose sole purpose is to misinform everyone here.

I still would like some proof that people get paid to troll blogs and news sites. And where can I get paid for my opinions (besides the occasional focus group)?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 08:48:19

You’re joking right?

Ya know what…… just go sign up for a million dollar note and buy a house. DO IT!

 
Comment by butters
2012-07-06 09:22:59

I think Obama campaign had started a truth squad some time ago. I am sure they pay.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-07-06 09:27:36

Hey SF hows brooklyn??????

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 18:23:00

Hey SF hows brooklyn??????

Friggin’ hot. We’re wilting. If it hits 80 degrees in SF everyone starts freaking out that we’re having a heat wave.

NYC Triathlon in 2 days. Swim in the Hudson, woohoo! It’ll be my 3rd time doing this race, and while it’s super fun (ride your bike on the West Side Highway up to Riverdale and back and through the tollbooth!) I am usually dying from the heat and the humidity when it’s time to run.

But you can’t beat the NYC spirit and cheering as you run down the middle of 72nd Street.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Liz Pendens
2012-07-06 07:19:55

Here is a good wholesome Florida Realtor story for ya:

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-07-06/news/os-lk-meow-mix-meth-robert-morris-20120706_1_real-estate-agent-federal-prison-federal-drug-trafficking-charge

*follow-up to a story I posted a long time ago on here. This is too good…

Comment by polly
2012-07-06 07:56:27

The link is funnier than the article.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:02:58

“meow-mix”? LOL… :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 10:21:31

Not just meow-mix, meow-mix-meth…

 
Comment by polly
2012-07-06 10:42:06

I wish they had left out the guy’s first name. Wasn’t there a cat food that used a cat called Morris in its commecials?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-07-06 10:51:35

Yeah…the bane of my childhood.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 04:59:11

Upcoming Crash Will Be ‘Worse Than 2008’ Says Economist Peter Schiff

Wednesday, 13 Jun 2012 03:52 PM
By Christian Hill

Investors need to prepare for an upcoming stock market crash that will be “worse than 2008.”

Peter Schiff, the CEO of Euro Pacific Capital, says the stock market collapse we experienced in 2008 “wasn’t the real crash. The real crash is coming.”

He says that Federal stimulus, or quantitative easing, never works and that it just makes the economy sicker in the end. “The reason we are so screwed up is all this quantitative easing is toxic. I don’t doubt that we are going to pressure Germany into printing. We are like the kid who is trying to get a friend to ditch school with us to go to the beach. We are a bad influence on everybody.”

That catastrophic outlook comes from Robert Wiedemer, economist and author of The New York Times best-seller Aftershock. Before you dismiss Wiedemer’s claims, consider this: In 2006 he accurately predicted the collapse of the U.S. housing market, equity markets, and consumer spending that almost sank the United States.

Editor’s Note: See the disturbing interview with Wiedemer.

In a recent interview, Wiedemer unapologetically displayed shocking charts backing up his allegations, and then ended his argument with, “You see, the medicine will become the poison.”

The blame lies squarely on those whose job it was to avoid the exact situation we find ourselves in, including current Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and former Chairman Alan Greenspan, tasked with preventing financial meltdowns and keeping the nation’s economy strong through monetary and credit policies.

At one point, Wiedemer even calls out Bernanke, saying that his “money from heaven will be the path to hell.”

http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/economy-2008-crash-schiff/2012/06/15/id/442489 - 59k -

AC/DC - HIGHWAY TO HELL LYRICS

Living easy, money’s free
Season ticket on a victim ride
Paying nothing, leave me be
Taking everything in my stride
Dont need reason, dont need rhyme
Aint nothing I’d rather do
Going down, party time
Your friends are gonna be there too, yeah

We`re on the highway to hell

highway to hell

We`re on the highway to hell

highway to hell

No stop signs, speed limit
Nobodys gonna slow us down
More cash? just print it
Nobodys gonna mess me round
Hey Obama, pay my mortgage
Im playing in a rocking band
Hey Bernanke, look at me
Im on my way to the promised land

OWWW

We`re on the highway to hell

highway to hell

We`re on the highway to hell

highway to hell

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-07-06 08:26:19

Yeah, well…I keep waiting…and could have doubled my money during that time if I’d have called the bottom correctly.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 08:29:49

If Wiedemer’s prediction is correct, that we will have 50% unemployment, a 90% stock market drop, and 100% annual inflation . . . starting in 2012.”

Then maybe borrowing 500K at 3.6% to buy the house of my dreams might not be such a crazy idea after all. Because the down payment I’ve saved from renting won’t be worth jack.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-06 14:18:34

That catastrophic outlook comes from Robert Wiedemer, economist and author of The New York Times best-seller Aftershock.

This is a link to sell this guys (actual) book, nothing else. And maybe he did predict the last crash, but how long had he been predicting a crash before it actually occurred? A broken clock is right twice a day.

Peter Schiff is also a perpetual crash predictor, so his finally being correct is not impressive to me either. Plus he owns a gold-selling biz, so he’s just talking his (financial) book. I guarantee he advises you to purchase gold.

 
Comment by BetterRenter
2012-07-07 03:57:25

Worse, Schiff? Worse for whom?

The bankers and rich people (BARP) have documented proof that the government has their back now. It became a theory once the LTCM (1998) bailout was arranged, but then the 2008 bailouts solidly proved it.

So the coming slump will be worse than 2008 for everyone but the BARP. BARP’s bailouts and tax breaks and credits and subsidies are already budgeted, per se. So in a notable way, the coming slump will be even better for the BARP, since their losses will be zero, no matter what, and they will be one of the few people left standing, economically speaking, so they will go on the next buying spree for cheap assets.

I’ve told people already that the 20/80 historical split in society (where the top 20% own 80% of everything) degraded into 20/85 by the end of the first decade of the new century. That’s not good enough for the always-greedy rich, so they are going to work on becoming a 20/90 society in the next generation. Going from 20/80 to 20/90 produces the horrifying realization that half of the wealth of the lowest 80% has to be transferred to the upper 20%. So on average, the middle class guy of the year 2000 will find himself at half power, economically speaking, by 2025 AD. And he must like it that way, since he continued voting D or R to support the exact same Bailout Government in each election during that period.

 
 
Comment by Martin
2012-07-06 05:17:17

India’s bubble in full swing. Many houses but no water and open sewer. Just last week one boy drowned in an open sewer when it rained.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/dry-taps-open-sewers-welcome-to-gurgaon-indias-millennium-city/articleshow/14708570.cms

Same story of bubbles still go on on Aussie, Canada, Singapore, China etc. Will it ever deflate to 2000 prices or keep going like this.

Comment by rms
2012-07-06 06:09:19

“Just last week one boy drowned in an open sewer when it rained.”

What was the boy doing in the ditch, looking for lunch?

Comment by oxide
2012-07-06 06:31:38

That’s pretty gross. I read that India has more cell phones than toilets, and I believe it.

Comment by Bad Chile
2012-07-06 07:26:08

I’d believe it too. Cell phone infrastructure - espically in an already developed urban environment - is significantly less expensive to impliment relative to sewer or water. And it is done by private entitites instead of poorly-funded public agencies that are really low on the powers-that-be list of “things to feed my ego”.

In many developing countries, mobile phones are not only significantly cheaper than land lines, they are (on an absolute, not relative scale) significantly cheaper than say the US market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Martin
2012-07-06 07:44:29

I think they don’t have the monthly plan system that we have in US. All they do it buy a phone and keep adding money to the SIM card. Moreover, incoming calls are free and are charged only for outgoing calls.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:16:40

In many developing countries, mobile phones are not only significantly cheaper than land lines,

And they should be—the infrastructure is DRAMATICALLY cheaper to roll out. Rather than poles and wires run down every block, all you need is a tower every few miles. WAY cheaper.

 
Comment by Itsabouttime
2012-07-06 17:36:53

The pay-as-you-go (PAYGo) system is common in Europe, too. When I lived in Prague few had landlines, but most had cellphones, and most were PAYGo. The PAYGo system has lots of advantages, not least of which is that under that system companies have an incentive to provide service because no one is LOCKED into long-term contracts.

IAT

 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2012-07-06 07:37:29

I was at a party in Long Island, NY last month. It was riddled with Indian doctors with kids born in the US. I think something like 90 percent have bought apartments in NYC. The prices are low and their kids want to live in the city was a repeated theme.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Martin
2012-07-06 07:42:39

Probably not looking for lunch, but when it rains and you are walking in a puddle it is hard to see where you step.

http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/5-year-old-boy-dies-after-falling-into-open-sewerage-in-gurgaon-240067

 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2012-07-06 05:33:24

80k jobs added in june, the recovery is on track?

Comment by Get Stucco
2012-07-06 06:10:50

More like stuck in neutral?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2012-07-06 06:54:04

it is worse than neutral since it does not even keep up with population growth. A smaller and smaller percentage of the population is working. People like Howard Dean expected a V shaped recovery like we had under Reagan due to the stimulus, instead this is the mother of all L shaped recoveries. Problem is any move to stimulate will lead to a surge in oil prices and we already have around triple digit prices in Brent crude. People forget that while we may have had close to $150 prices in 2008 by the end of the year we had prices in $30s. I just don’t ever see a recovery with high debt, no progress here since the reduction in private debt is more than offset by the increase in US government debt and high oil prices. I just don’t think we have made any progress the last three years. The political hacks from both parties will just seek to inflate away the debt with easy money which keeps up the nominal price of houses but causes the worse tax on the middle class, the tax of inflation.

As I said on this board, around the day Obama was elected, I see him electing Romney. The sad part had he really pushed an “all of the above energy policy”, he might have have been successful.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2012-07-06 08:46:24

From the American Enterprise Institute today;

Job growth during the three-year Obama recovery has averaged just 75,000 a month for a total of 2.7 million. During the first three years of the Reagan Recovery, job growth averaged 273,000 a month for a total of 9.8 million. If you adjust for the larger U.S. population today, the Reagan Recovery averaged 360,000 jobs a month for a three-year total of 13 million jobs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-07-06 09:07:30

Bush’s fault!

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-07-06 09:25:40

Stimulus works. Until it doesn’t.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-07-06 09:29:17

I’ll add that it’s fascinating to watch people complain about stimulus while ignoring that of the 80s and 00s while touting the same time periods as examples of success. If anything, the 00s “stimulused” us out.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 10:07:42

Bush’s fault!

He did hand over an economy that was hemorrhaging 700K jobs per month with rising deficits. Considering that when Bush took office, there was a budget surplus and unemployment was at a 31 year low, I’d say it was his fault.

So yeah, he rolled the car into a ditch and tried to blame someone else.

 
Comment by butters
2012-07-06 12:22:45

Considering that when Bush took office, there was a budget surplus and unemployment was at a 31 year low, I’d say it was his fault.

Wasn’t Bush also handed a dotcom bust and sure to follow recession when Clinton left office?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-06 14:30:55

Wasn’t Bush also handed a dotcom bust and sure to follow recession when Clinton left office?

What did his two wars cost us?

$3.7 trillion (with a ‘T’) and counting…

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 15:45:05

It is easy to sell stimulus to our Congress when it is for a war.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-06 18:34:21

It is easy to sell stimulus to our Congress when it is for a war.

Some will take their stimulus no other way.

 
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2012-07-06 06:11:54

“80k jobs added in june…”

Trick is to be one of those peeps, and I’m sure those 80k were among the best at what they do.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:21:19

Trick is to be one of those peeps, and I’m sure those 80k were among the best at what they do.

I wish I had your optimism, rms; I think it’s actually fairly hard to ensure that based strictly on a resume.

Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 11:06:21

I wish I had your optimism, rms; I think it’s actually fairly hard to ensure that based strictly on a resume.

We’re back to the 70’s, where it was all about who you knew, not what you knew. My mother’s experience of trying to break into public education in the 70’s (and failing) was that if you didn’t have a friend in school administration or on the school board, you weren’t getting a job…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 15:46:28

“My mother’s experience of trying to break into public education in the 70’s”

Baby bust.

 
 
 
 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 06:11:56

“80k jobs added in june, the recovery is on track?”

8,733,461: Workers on Federal ‘Disability’ Exceed Population of New York City

By Terence P. Jeffrey
July 2, 2012

(CNSNews.com) - A record of 8,733,461 workers took federal disability insurance payments in June 2012, according to the Social Security Administration. That was up from 8,707,185 in May.

It also exceeds the entire population of New York City, which according to the Census Bureau’s latest estimate hit 8,244,910 in July 2011.

In June 1992, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 118,419,000 people employed in the United States, and, according to the Social Security Administration, there were 3,334,333 workers taking federal disability payments. That equaled about 1 person taking disability payments for each 35.5 people actually working.

In May of this year, there were 142,287,000 people employed, and 8,707,185 workers taking federal disability payments. That equaled 1 worker taking disability payments for each 16.3 people working.

Federal disability insurance is funded by a 1.8 percent payroll tax split between employers and workers. Self-employed people pay the entire 1.8 percent.

The Social Security System’s Disability Insurance Trust Fund has run deficits in each of the last three fiscal years, meaning the government has needed to borrow money to pay disability benefits to the workers claiming them. In fiscal 2009, the Disability Insurance Trust Fund deficit was $8.5 billion. In fiscal 2010, it was $20.8 billion. And in fiscal 2011, it was $25.3 billion.

“Social Security work credits are based on your total yearly wages or self-employment income,” SSA explains. “You can earn up to four credits each year. The amount needed for a credit changes from year to year. In 2012, for example, you earn one credit for each $1,130 of wages or self-employment income. When you’ve earned $4,520, you’ve earned your four credits for the year.”

According to SSA’s formula, someone under 24 years of age would qualify for disability payments if he or she had earned at least 6 credits—or about $6,780—over the three years before they became disabled.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/8733461-workers-federal-disability-exceed-population-new-york-city - 31k

Comment by michael
2012-07-06 06:42:29

no fraud there…move along.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:30:34

I’m beginning to think that people on “disability” (many of who are very able) should be required to allow their position and activities to be monitored. Those who are hitting the links, etc, should get cut off.

I knew a fellow who was on “disability” from Boeing due to an issue with his back. I think the initial injury was real, but he seemed to live a perfectly active life thereafter, milking it as a permanent injury when its effect seemed quite temporary. Based on the other things he was able to do, there’s no way that he was unable to perform some sort of useful job function.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-07-06 08:36:29

Based on the other things he was able to do, there’s no way that he was unable to perform some sort of useful job function.

I’m sure that’s true. The problem is the cases where “some sort of useful job function” isn’t exactly the same as their old job. They probably aren’t going to be able to get hired at something else…

 
Comment by michael
2012-07-06 10:10:48

i know someone that’s literally been just hanging out the past 30 years.

he loves golf, cooking, and his two beautifully restored anitque automobiles.

he was a cop and injured his shoulder when he was 40.

he is also a staunch republican.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-07-06 19:17:14

“he is also a staunch republican.”

You guys kill me.

 
 
 
Comment by rms
2012-07-06 07:24:10

“According to SSA’s formula, someone under 24 years of age would qualify for disability payments if he or she had earned at least 6 credits—or about $6,780—over the three years before they became disabled.”

That’s the Gangsta challenge! Can’t ‘ya lower the bar some, bro?

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 07:29:30

Living on $1200/month of disability must be some real fine living, high on the hog. Better cut that back to $400/month so all those non-producers don’t get too uppity.

Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 07:41:30

No kidding.

$1200 might be a good income to someone living in the backwoods, but the moment to live somewhere with running water, sewers, electricity, paved roads and more than one stoplight, you are just barely getting by.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2012-07-06 08:20:29

eustance on the new show mountain men on history channel says he lives on 2 grand a year.He sells firewood and lumber for his land. he is a hardcore survivalist though. grows his own food, hunts deer, cuts his own lumber etc.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 09:07:55

…and I know people who live under bridges. :lol:

But is that what we want for society? That standard of living is generally considered to be 3rd world.

 
Comment by michael
2012-07-06 10:28:20

i know quite a few people that live on that…or even less.

one in particular is a very talented artist. hasn’t pai a dime in taxes…cept for maybe on some wages here and there he earned doing construction or working on the river boat from time to time.

you people really should get out more.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 11:09:02

If you think everyone can live on less that 1200 a month for long periods of time, YOU should get out more often.

I’ve seen far too many people DIE from being poor. Personally seen them.

 
Comment by oxide
2012-07-06 11:15:01

If you collect a gov check as your income, then you’re not tied to an office or a commute, and you can live in the backwoods no problem.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-07-06 07:46:04

Goon add in medicaid Food stamps, and low subsidized rent or mom basement…and it don’t look to bad to some 50+ year old slub who decided after 25 resumes I’m too old to be hired anymore.

Add in Ohboozoo lack of support for EEOC, cutting job training funds so he can spend it in Afghanni and you have a viable alternative.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 09:28:42

The EEOC was gutted by years, er, DECADES of Republican obstruction.

Spent it on Afghanistan? What about the withdraw from Iraq? Or did that war just suddenly cease to have ever existed?

 
 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 07:55:57

“Better cut that back to $400/month so all those non-producers don’t get too uppity.”

The dude who I lived across the street from for a few years who was getting federal disability payments, he had 2 kids and had recieved a settlement from a workers comp. case. He was a big bike rider, pretty good at playing ball with his kids and working on his boat. As his oldest kid approached 18 he started expressing interest in getting back into the work force.

How much will your child receive in benefits?

How much your child receives in benefits depends upon how much money you, as the disabled individual, receive as a SSDI benefit. Generally, your child will receive up to 50% of your total SSDI benefit. It is important to note that there is a maximum amount that a family can receive based on one disabled individual’s benefits. The family limit is usually 150% - 180% of the total SSDI benefit awarded to the disabled individual. If your family would receive above that percentage, each individual receiving a benefit (with the exclusion of the disabled individual) will have their percentage of benefit lowered proportionally until the total benefit is below the percentage limit.

For example, if you are a single mother with four children and you become disabled, each child could potentially receive 50% of your SSDI award. However, if each child received 50% of your award, Social Security would be paying out 300% of your total award (100% received by you and 50% received by each of your four children). Therefore, you would receive your 100% as the disabled individual and your children would have their percentages lowered equally until the total family benefit fell below the percentage limit set by Social Security.

How long will your child receive benefits?
Generally, children will receive dependent SSDI benefits until they reach the age of 18 years old. The benefit will end the month before their 18th birthday.

If your child is a full-time student, the benefit will end when they graduate from or leave secondary school or two months after they turn 19, whichever happens first.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:34:47

As his oldest kid approached 18 he started expressing interest in getting back into the work force.

Think of the work-ethic that these kids grew up witnessing. Wonder how that will work out for them.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 08:45:15

Don’t even get me started on the Mormons and Hasidim with 10+ kids and everyone on public assistance. There’s some insanity.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/13/welfare-reform-not-for-the-orthodox.html

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-06 18:39:00

The dude who I lived across the street from for a few years who was getting federal disability payments, he had 2 kids and had recieved a settlement from a workers comp. case. He was a big bike rider, pretty good at playing ball with his kids and working on his boat.

Why didn’t you take some pictures, send them in, and bust him?

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-07-06 09:10:34

$1200/month + spouse working full time + under the table job + whole bunch of other benefits available to those on disability like food stamps/Medicaid = living pretty well

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 09:24:21

You know nothing about how government bennies are handled do you? There are plenty of people in jail who think the administration agencies don’t think of these things either.

You REALLY need to experience this to understand. I sincerely hope you get your turn. You have a 60% chance, you know.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 10:06:49

I sincerely hope you get your turn. You have a 60% chance, you know.

“Smithers, release the hounds!”

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 10:55:22

Mr. Smithers, you forgot the Earned Income Tax Credit!

Let’s review the income guidelines from IRS Pub 596. In 2011, to qualify for the maximum EIC of $5,751, a married filing jointly taxpayer with three children must have an income of $12,750 to $21,800. A single or head of household taxpayer must have an income of $12,750 to $16,700 to qualify for the maximum EIC of $5,751.

Life must be pretty grand when you’re making under $16,700 or $21,800?

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 10:56:50

^ Edit: single or head of household taxpayer with three children

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-07-06 19:20:16

“I sincerely hope you get your turn. You have a 60% chance, you know.”

If your people get their way, we will all get a turn.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2012-07-06 08:16:11

I think Wall Street is happy with this report as they can bet on QE3 by August now. Would it happen? Probably in an election year it would.

Comment by azdude
2012-07-06 10:02:29

I flipped on cnbc and all they talk about is QE? How about some real work out here for people?

You would think QE would be seen as a sign of desperation not prosperity.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 11:11:45

QE3?! WTF?!

The DOW is steady over 12K and Fortune 1000 companies are showing record profits! And they need more assistance?!

BULLCRAP!!

 
 
 
Comment by JDinCT
2012-07-06 06:13:01

Healthcare discetionary?
Apparently so.
I just heard an economist on CNBC say that she had had conversations with multiple CEO’s and was surprised to hear that in some places half of prescriptions are not being picked up and people are using doctors/hospitals much less.

it kind of reminds me of back in 2008-2009 when dentists offices were left empty because people were cutting back.
i’m waiting for September to roll around and hear from the universities taht wonder why the students aren’t coming.

If anyone has any links/anecdotes along these lines it would be interesting to hear them.

Comment by butters
2012-07-06 06:31:12

I have friends in their 30’s still visit their doctors every time they get a cold or flu.

Comment by rms
2012-07-06 07:35:44

So you know my wife, huh?

Comment by butters
2012-07-06 08:11:24

She said she wasn’t married.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 08:51:41

Doctors scare me. Fortunately, I have good health, so staying away from doctors has worked pretty well.

Comment by azdude
2012-07-06 11:02:16

scare me too. the distrust out there is not healthy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 11:20:10

The reason I distrust them is because I can’t be sure that what they’re recommending is as good for my health as it is for their income. After all, they get paid for doing things. Whether those things are good is often beside the point.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-06 18:45:01

I can’t be sure that what they’re recommending is as good for my health as it is for their income.

The inherent problem of the for-profit health care system.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 21:02:31

MD’s will put you under the knife when you don’t need it. They do it all the time.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 07:48:36

i’m waiting for September to roll around and hear from the universities taht wonder why the students aren’t coming.

I’ve been waiting for that to happen for the last few years. Hasn’t happened yet. Part of the problem with an economy not producing enough jobs is that everyone is told it is a good time to go back to school, get that degree for a new job/graduate degree to be more qualified/competitive (and rack up more debt).

When the college bubble bursts, it’s going to be epic…

Comment by aNYCdj
2012-07-06 07:57:35

Yup NE years ago I predicted at least 1/3 of the colleges would have to be eliminated over this but hopefully a lot of the money could be spent on real life training….how to fix things for yourself and be more self sufficient ……and make a HS diploma really mean something again.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 08:24:51

American HIgh School grads will have the pleasure of serving meals and scrubbing toilets for college educated Indian H1-b’s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2012-07-06 09:14:54

And American College Grads will serve coffee to Asian American Engineers, Doctors and Scientists.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 09:16:07

…who will be paid half of what the position paid the previous generation.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 10:01:15

“who will be paid half of what the position paid the previous generation.”

We’re already getting close. The H1-B program has been Corporate America’s good friend, as 10+ years of stagnant wages in tech will bear witness,

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 11:13:41

Close? We’re WAY past that point.

At the last place I worked, several years ago, many of people I met there were already making half of what they had been making 10 years previously.

 
 
Comment by Pete
2012-07-06 14:14:10

“how to fix things for yourself and be more self sufficient”

That’ would put alot of people out of work…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 08:54:19

Anecdotal evidence from Tucson: “To make the situation even more disturbing, [the author of a recent newspaper article] says that the UA is now ‘backing away from earlier enrollment projections of a 12.5 percent increase over the next five years.’”

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 12:20:16

I wonder if developers of those luxury student apartments were relying on those stats?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 12:23:14

We neighborhood activists think that they were.

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-07-06 07:52:09

And of course this is azzzz backwards in America..if we are a service face to face economy who is going to hire you with missing or bad teeth? Heck even cheap video conferencing has HD cameras…

it kind of reminds me of back in 2008-2009 when dentists offices were left empty because people were cutting back

Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 08:26:53

The Lucky Duckies will have jobs at Walmart. No good teeth needed there.

Comment by Carl Morris
2012-07-06 08:37:35

I bet good teeth still help when there are 10 positions and 100 resumes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 09:56:24

Maybe. I suspect that at Walmart they are more concerned if you will show up on time for your shift.

 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 11:14:53

…and sober.

 
 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 11:13:56

The back teeth are not apparent on casual inspection. I have gold caps on the back teeth that broke. The gold ones are more durable where I really need the durability. I have porcelain ones on the teeth that are visible.

I wonder if there will be a market for a cheap, over the counter, veneer in a few years. Go to the drugstore and pick up a set for the interview. Maybe they already have them.

 
 
Comment by polly
2012-07-06 08:03:13

“i’m waiting for September to roll around and hear from the universities taht wonder why the students aren’t coming.”

As long as the loans are processed, they will show up. You need money or at least a functioning credit card to pick up a prescription.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 08:33:40

Part of the problem with prescriptions is that if they aren’t long time generics, you’re probably looking at paying at least $100 to fill it, if not more. And not all generics are cheap either.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 11:15:24

There are stories around of seniors self-rationing their prescriptions - taking them every other day or half a dose.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 08:22:42

“If anyone has any links/anecdotes along these lines it would be interesting to hear them.”

My doctor’s practice has been steadily shrinking. It went from six doctors and you can’t get in to see one for a week, to three doctors and they can see you today. Now the practice is being shut down and merged into another one, which is corporate owned (Banner Health).

“I have friends in their 30’s still visit their doctors every time they get a cold or flu.”

They must not have an HD plan. Everyone I know who’s been forced into one of those is skipping the visits to the doctor.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:37:28

Everyone I know who’s been forced into one of those is skipping the visits to the doctor.

Maybe it will turn out that we don’t have a shortage of doctors after all…

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 08:56:41

I have an HD plan. It’s pretty much the same as what any other self-employed person has. And my crappy insurance company is being sued up the wazoo.

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 11:30:13

I had one of those plans a few years back. It ended up saving me more than I paid in when my son had an accident and my husband had a defibrillator replaced. It was cheap and we could afford it.

They covered what they said they would cover. We paid about 25% of what the providers billed. The insurance company paid about the same. I did not feel that I was oversold or lied to by the agent. And when I changed to an employer provided plan, that HD plan meant that pre-existing conditions were covered.

I did get in the mindset of not going to the doctor for ordinary health maintenance type of care. There were only so many dollars available for health care.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by cincydad
2012-07-06 08:24:19

“i’m waiting for September to roll around and hear from the universities taht wonder why the students aren’t coming.

If anyone has any links/anecdotes along these lines it would be interesting to hear them”
—————–
My wife teaches at a university. Main campus, one of the better universities in MidWest, is having trouble attracting students. The branch campuses, on the other hand, have record enrollments.

(Main campus = traditional students, 4 year degree-oriented, isolated college town.

Branch campuses - cost 1/2 as much as main campus, lots of non-trad students, 2 & 4 year degrees, located nearer big cities)

Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 08:29:53

Branch campus also mean you can live at home and skip the $8-10K per year “residence halls”.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-06 08:39:17

+1. I would guess that that is the main driver of this trend…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 08:52:44

Miami U in Oxford? The squad considered going there but went to OSU Columbus instead after a year at Community College.

 
Comment by MissMouseAZ
2012-07-06 12:30:02

Opposite story here in Tucson, especially at the medical school (where I happen to work). This year, over 800 students competed for 115 spots - and the ones that made it will pay about $60,000 per year.

I hear business is booming on the main campus as well. Mainly because it’s cheaper for California residents to pay for out-of-state tuition and housing for their kids, than it would cost for them to stay in-state in CA.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 13:10:59

Okay, MissMouseAZ, I’m calling Tucson HBB meetup. You in?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MissMouseAZ
2012-07-06 14:19:03

Bring it on! Now that we’re below triple-digits, it seems like a splendid time to get out and about!

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 14:35:25

Cool. Let’s do it. Here’s a linky-doo that you can use for getting in touch with me.

If it can possibly wait until early next month, that would be good. For the rest of this month, I’m being held hostage by a certain radio station. You know the one.

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 08:36:10

Healthcare discetionary?

Healthcare is for closers?

 
 
Comment by Bad Chile
2012-07-06 07:08:28

Awaiting
How’d your best and final go? Here in the more desireable burbs of Boston a similar thing happens to what you see in CA. 80% of the housing stock has some serious ignored maintenance, and the remaining 20% gets pounced on like (fill in the blank). So despite there being record inventory, the only inventory getting action is 1 out of 5. It was (and would be) a difficult decision to be stuck in. But better than being stuck in a house you don’t want.

Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 07:35:11

Bad Chile
Haven’t heard anything, but in Ca it’s a 72 response time. We might just have been baited for a highest, to set the floor for another cash & close, or a buyer who will bring more to the close to get the appraisal issue resolved.

It’s a crapshoot, and the wait is nerve wrecking.

Your last sentence is sinking in. You have an excellent point.(The amt of our highest and the home’s inners makes me numb.Nice on exterior and great neighborhood.)

Hopefully, we’ll get a sorry or a congrats this weekend.

Comment by Bad Chile
2012-07-06 08:17:17

Good luck!

Lots of us have been there before, and you have a good attitude. You’ll be happy either way, and that is a pretty good place to be.

Enjoy the remaining 48+ hours!

 
Comment by SUGuy
2012-07-06 08:45:36

My advice is never to get attached to any deal. In your case there will be another nice house around the corner coming on the market soon at a lower price soon. You are selling cash someone has to part with a house to get that cash, and as combo says you are da KING.

Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 10:08:33

I use to think cash was king too, but not anymore. With the FHA 3.5% down, a low credit limit, and using your cash to buy down the appraisal delta, an idiot can overpay and wipe out our cash offer. SFH sales is a dirty business that preys on ignorance. So far, UHS don’t much like us.

Having an EE in the house is like garlic or sunlight to a vampire, plus my original career was accounting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-07-06 10:52:00

The only place cash will give you an advantage is a place that needs so much structural or other major work that only a cash buyer can consider it since you need cash to make repairs. If people can get financing for major repairs, then cash doesn’t give you an advantage at all.

 
Comment by SV guy
2012-07-06 11:25:43

“The only place cash will give you an advantage is a place that needs so much structural or other major work that only a cash buyer can consider it since you need cash to make repairs. If people can get financing for major repairs, then cash doesn’t give you an advantage at all.”

Which is an excellent way to go if you’ve got the time and $$. You will have remodeled it to suit your own tastes.

Easier said than done though.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 07:44:35

As long as prices are being set at the margin and the 20% of housing stock that is moving is setting lower comps, I’m happy. Seeing some lowering of prices on SFH’s in Southeastern MA that have been sitting, but that is just putting them closer to what it costs to build new. I’m also guessing the sellers are panicking because we’re past peak selling season for “family-friendly” housing.

Still waiting for $100/sqft in our target towns on something in the 2500sqft range. Currently those towns are at 175-200/sqft.

Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 08:30:23

Northeastener
Try $205-$247/ sq ft for a plain 1970’s one-story shack that needs work. So Ca is insane.

Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 08:48:44

You’ve just described why I won’t be relocating to CA unless I’m disgustingly rich.

Hear you on the whole fixer-upper thing. I swore to my wife I would never buy another fixer-upper again in my lifetime (have owned 2). Next house will only need paint and carpeting…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 09:09:15

I would never move to CA no matter how rich I was. Oregon and Washington are far more appealing.

 
Comment by b-hamster
2012-07-06 09:30:18

It’s amazing the number of Califonrnians that move up to Washington only to head back after a few winters. I told my housemate (from Flagstaff) “don’t worry, it gets a little easier after the second or third winter here.” She assured me there wasn’t going to be a second winter.

And for what it’s worth, homes sell upwards of $200/sf her with a median hourly wage of $18/hour. But at least the temperature has finally hit the seventies.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2012-07-06 09:50:06

“It’s amazing the number of Califonrnians that move up to Washington only to head back after a few winters.”

Same here. Which has led to my admittedly not very positive thoughts of “Just go away” every time I see another CA plate here. Although they’re not the only ones. There’s no doubt in my mind this transient population has distorted many markets up here. Can’t tell you how many houses I’ve followed that have been bought then sold two years later by out of staters.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 09:54:05

Same here. Which has led to my admittedly not very positive thoughts of “Just go away” every time I see another CA plate here.

We say the same things here in Arizona. To the point where, whenever I see a CA licensed car making a turn toward the west, I say “Yup, I-10’s that way. Keep going!”

 
Comment by b-hamster
2012-07-06 10:41:08

It’s not really the Californians, per se, that I oppose. But it’s the ones that expect the exact same lifestyle (generic subdivisions, strip malls, pavement) that they ran away from.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 11:08:31

it’s the ones that expect the exact same lifestyle (generic subdivisions, strip malls, pavement) that they ran away from.

I thought they were running away from high taxes and high prices?

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-07-06 19:27:41

“It’s not really the Californians, per se, that I oppose. But it’s the ones that expect the exact same lifestyle (generic subdivisions, strip malls, pavement) that they ran away from.”

They also want to import the same twisted brand of progressive politics that made California the toilet it is today.

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-07-06 23:07:23

Funny. That’s how I feel about all the out-of-staters who come here to CA and bring their asinine politics and expectations with them. Fifth generation here, like it just fine. Please stay out?

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-07-07 00:06:23

I lived in Santa Barbara for Seven Years and the Bay area for two, been there and done that. You can have it. I notice you don’t live around all of the carnage your political allies have created in the golden state. It’s easy to preach from high upon the mountain…What’s the saying? “Not in my back yard!”

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-07-07 00:23:45

“My political allies?” And who might those be, nick? I’m about as far right and as far left as it’s possible to be in this state and still be called upon to serve on either State party committee. I’ve friends on both sides and all peripheries of the political aisle…all based on political practicalities.

Over the years I’ve left Laguna, Malibu, Palos Verdes, upper Bev Hills and Mammoth Lakes because of nouveau riche rednecks with too much money and too little appreciation for what they were effing up. Never had that problem with the true conservationists and the creative community that’s lived here for generations– only the folks who come here and think they have a clue because they’ve “been there and done that” for a few years.

As for my “back yard” it’s so redneck that even the rednecks are afraid to come up here and get all rednecky. So take your assumptions and well, keep them out of my state. :-)

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-07-08 02:22:25

I will agree with you on the Rednecks, they do have a way of ruining things for the rest of us.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-07-06 19:27:05

So. Calif is insane, true. But central Cal has location location location (if you are in an ocean view): MLS #186955: 9245 Sycamore Canyon Rd: Big Sur, CA $1,495,000, 5 acres with ocean views, always cool temperatures, high above tsunamis, and with lots of clean air.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2012-07-06 21:12:27

Big Sur has some bad assed weather. I lived with my sister there for one summer back in the very early 80’s and the memory of the weather has stuck with me all these years. Nites are perfect sleep weather. Dry, cool. Then day after day of perfect 70-75 degree days, not a cloud in the sky….. endless perfect weather.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by drillboss
2012-07-06 09:16:17

The Cost of Moving: how is this included in the rent-vs-buy decision? I moved in November (to a home I had built) and the moving cost was almost $8000. As a renter, even infrequent moves (which may be outside of your, or even the landlords control) can change the dynamic. Or not?

Comment by butters
2012-07-06 09:31:31

$8000? Did you hire an armored vehicle?

Last time I moved it was $300 and tips and I emptied a 1600 SQ feet house.

Comment by In Colorado
2012-07-06 09:43:46

8K does seem like a lot of an in town move. It’s about right for a town to town professional move, where they pack everything for you

Comment by drillboss
2012-07-06 10:14:27

It was 350 miles. And everything boxed/packed properly, as I am fortunate to have some nicer items

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 16:14:40

“It was 350 miles. And everything boxed/packed properly, as I am fortunate to have some nicer items”

It was 350 miles by weight or up front price? Worked for over the road movers in my early twenties out of a North American agency. They would have the guys they hired locally get out of the truck for the weigh in before the truck was loaded and have us stay in the truck for the weigh in after the truck was loaded. They got paid by lbs. x miles.

“I am fortunate to have some nicer items”

A couple of years before I worked at that North American agency they broke a Ming vase. It was something the guys in the yard and on the trucks joked about but it was not something the people in the office joked about. :)

 
Comment by sfrenter
2012-07-06 18:28:31

Maybe we shouldn’t have gotten that piano. Moving a piano is easily $300.

 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 09:32:22

Moving 1400 miles cross country in 2009 cost about $3000: U-Haul rental, gas for truck and squadmobile, travel meals and lodging, most of which taken as above the line tax deduction. Moving 10 miles across town in 2010, less than $200. And will likely be moving across town this fall to new rental for proximity to new job, at higher rent but worth paying for quality of life in less commuting time…

Comment by drillboss
2012-07-06 10:15:42

Wow, I had a semi plus a 30ish foot long truck,

Do you carry everything yourself too?

Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 10:24:24

This was to move a 900SF apartment, not a house. And since metro Denver remains overpriced at 4-5x median incomes, no desire to buy soon, if ever…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 09:33:59

Moving costs are why landlords think they can raise rents with impunity.

Moving IS expensive if you hire it all out. Moving yourself is no fun either. Best compromise is not to own a lot of stuff AND heavy furniture and make it a point to live on the ground floor near parking and move as much of your stuff as can, hiring out only the heavy lifting.

But yes, moving costs are an important factor whether renting or owning.

 
Comment by ahansen
2012-07-06 23:18:13

Agree, drillguy.

I could have made a decent down-payment with all the money I spent on moves over the years– seemingly necessitated at the whim of rapacious LL’s. Then there’s the cost of setting up a new household; cleaning supplies, small furnishings, utility deposits, re-orienting commutes, new schools, etc.

 
 
Comment by wphr_editor
2012-07-06 09:44:19

Today’s HBB-ready headline comes from ABCnews via google news:

“5 Million Jobs Still Missing Since Recession Ended”

Recession - what recession? I don’t see a recession around here anywhere…..

Here’s the full article although it looks like they changed the headline: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/us-employers-add-80000-jobs-economy-struggles-16723934#.T_cVqfWDl8E

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 09:58:06

Here’s a Rich Toscano column about jobs lost in San Diego. He notes that a lot of them were bubble jobs — real estate, mortgage, construction, and retail. And a lot of the retail had some connection with the bubble, such as furniture stores.

So, I’d like to see a national breakdown. I suspect that there’s an over-representation of bubble jobs like the ones that went poof in San Diego.

Comment by b-hamster
2012-07-06 10:51:48

Well here my anecdotal observation: I had lunch last week with a friend who owns a shredding/recycling company up here. He said that he recently met with twenty-five of his biggest clients and over half were adding staff - some managers, but mostly laborer types in the $10-$15/hr range. A bright spot in employment? I dunno.

Comment by azdude
2012-07-06 11:06:04

10- 15 bucks an hour a bright spot? can you live on that? 30-40 might get some people off the couch.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-07-06 11:21:47

$10 is real min wage and $15 is just barely above it. $18hr is just barely able to live on your own, no roommates, not have dumpster furniture (but still used/2nd hand) and save some money if you’re frugal. (I said frugal, not monk)

$20+ and you’re starting to move into lower middles class.

For reference, please see: http://www.halfhill.com/inflation.html

 
Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 11:22:20

Half of this country’s workforce make less than $500/week.

The future belongs to Lucky Ducky :)

 
Comment by b-hamster
2012-07-06 11:51:56

Unfortunately, $15/hr is the new norm as we continue to evolve into a service economy in a race to the bottom. Get used to it.

I do without the newest iPhones, televisions, shiny cars, expensive hobbies, and live quite comfortably on modest means. Most of my contemporaries couldn’t fathom it though.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2012-07-06 20:04:15

“10- 15 bucks an hour a bright spot?”

If I found myself unemployed, I would not be above working for that amount, and if I could get my wife to to the same, we would survive just fine.

 
 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 17:18:53

The economy created just 80,000 jobs in June, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. But that same month, 85,000 workers left the workforce entirely to enroll in the Social Security Disability Insurance program, according to the Social Security Administration.

The disability ranks have outpaced job growth throughout President Obama’s economic recovery. While the economy has created 2.6 million jobs since June 2009, fully 3.1 million workers signed up for disability benefits.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by DBA Muggy
2012-07-06 10:41:55

“A woman watching Fourth of July fireworks from a golf course was struck in the leg by a falling bullet as her 7-year-old son sat in her lap, Temple Terrace police said.”

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/woman-recovering-after-being-hit-by-falling-bullet-in-temple-terrace/1239010

Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 11:19:12

Don’t think for one second that a responsible, law-abiding, NRA-supporting gun owner would do something as dangerous as firing blindly into the air in celebration. If I saw someone doing that, I would be the first person to call the police.

You can’t legislate away stupidity and ignorance…

Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 11:22:40

Before he could no longer be trusted with guns, my father was one of those responsible, law-abiding, NRA-supporting gun owners. And he was as anti “shooting into the air in celebration” as they come.

Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 11:33:12

Alzheimer’s is a terrible disease.

Bottom line, you must be of sound mind and good judgement… the responsibility of gun ownership is not to be taken lightly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 12:27:57

On that fine day when I got the call from the hospital, the following happened:

My mother was successfully operated on for her hip and wrist breaks. She went to rehab shortly thereafter.

My dad couldn’t remember how to drive back home. (He forgot the route.) So, the hospital social worker and I found a neighbor who could get him back to the house.

Neighbor found the key to the gun closet and locked it. He took the key back to his house. I think he still has it. When I came back here, I left my mother to take care of that detail.

She also told me that she wanted the guns out of the house, and I gave her the name of a nearby shop that buys collections. The rest was up to her, and she hasn’t said what she did. Reason: When she’s on the phone, my father’s usually hovering nearby.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-07-06 12:36:10

I forget…where are they? I think I remember you saying they were back east, but if they are in AZ I have a relative with a gun shop in Sun City if that would ever be useful information to you…

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-07-06 13:12:03

I forget…where are they? I think I remember you saying they were back east…

Thanks for asking, Carl. My folks are in eastern PA.

 
 
 
Comment by DBA Muggy
2012-07-06 15:46:38

Chill out NE, Obama and I aren’t coming to take your gun(s).

Comment by Northeastener
2012-07-06 20:43:58

Just making sure :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by DBA Muggy
2012-07-06 10:51:46

Realtors smoke meow mix meth.

 
Comment by cactus
 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 15:00:09

Just got the sorry, it’s not you email from our broker (not an agent-a real broker).

We think not only did someone pay more, they didn’t put a clause in the highest and best, that we would not close escrow until we walk thru the vacant house, since it was a rental. We didn’t want the headache of getting rid of a tenant. We don’t know any of these people and were protecting ourselves. It kind of sounded like we insulted the owner. I hope the bidding winner protected themselves as well. (Actually not.)

 
Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 15:02:38

I think we did the right thing.COE + 2 could turn into weeks or months until the tenant was out.

We’re moving to another area. We’re done here.

Comment by goon squad
2012-07-06 15:08:49

Leaving Los Angeles? To go where?

Comment by Awaiting
2012-07-06 16:31:20

goon
Working on that this weekend.

I’ll let you guys in on the decision soon.

Happy weekend everyone.

 
 
Comment by Bad Chile
2012-07-06 16:43:03

Another story. Sorry. At least it sounds like you didn’t lose.

Where to next?

 
Comment by SV guy
2012-07-06 19:00:53

“We’re moving to another area. We’re done here.”

You just widened your options significantly!

 
Comment by jane
2012-07-07 17:24:43

Personally, I think you dodged a bullet. Fwiw, I have done just that (left) on a couple of occasions and wound up just fine. About the act of “leaving” an insane environment that beggars you and rewards the leeches - I side staunchly with Oxy.

Very best to you and Hubs!

 
 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 16:39:45

See Deadbeat.

See free money.

See free money for Deadbeat.

See Deadbeat run for free money.

Run Deadbeat run!

Foreclosure help letters should be written at middle-school level

by Kim Miller

The Post published a story today about the low response to an Office of the Comptroller of the Currency program that could net homeowners harmed by a foreclosure up to $125,000.

It turns out, one reason for the lack of interest could be the complex letters sent to more than 4 million Americans explaining the Independent Foreclosure Review.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report June 29 that said a consumer group study found the letters were written at a second-year college reading level.

The Securities and Exchange Commission recommends that materials to consumers be written at a sixth- to eighth-grade level, the report notes. Nearly half of the adult population in the U.S. reads at or below the eighth-grade level, according to a 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy report.

Even the foreclosure review’s website gets dinged for its complexity in the government report. The legal section of the online submission form where borrowers acknowledge they are requesting a review of their foreclosure and swear to the truthfulness of their application is written at a level equivalent to a college junior.

“Readability tests of the outreach letter, request-for-review form, and website indicate that a high school or even a college reading level may be required to understand them,” the GAO report says. “However, the use of some complex terms may be unavoidable.”

http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/realtime/2012/07/06/foreclosure-help-letters-should-be-written-at-middle-school-level/ - -

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2012-07-06 17:56:12

It is possible to write unintelligibly and not use large, technical, or obscure language.

 
 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-06 16:57:20

July 2, 2012, 7:18 PM.

Listing Gone Stale? Extol the Virtues of Ghost-Free Living

There’s no room for humor in real estate.

That’s what some fellow real-estate agents told Jake Palmer when he started adding ironic descriptions to for-sale signs outside a home in the Canadian city of Saint John. He’s the agent for the sellers, who were having trouble finding a buyer.

One sign boasted that the home is “not haunted.” Another said it had “indoor plumbing.”

There’s more: “It’s a brick, house,” went up as Mr. Palmer added the Commodores’ disco anthem by the same name to the listing’s website. “Love shack, baby” appeared another week. (Slide show.)

Fellow real-estate brokers, Mr. Palmer said, rolled their eyes and wagged their fingers. Humor and real estate don’t mix well, they said.

Mr. Palmer, an agent with Re/Max Professionals Saint John, admits the approach is unconventional, but with the listing languishing after a year on the market, he and the sellers, Ray and Kim Seaward, decided it was time for something new. “We really felt it had gone stale,” Mr. Palmer said. One deal had fallen through around Christmas after the prospective buyer, who had already put down a sizeable deposit on the home, inexplicably backed out.

For his part, Mr. Seaward said they just wanted local attention to keep people looking. And that seems to have worked: There’s been an uptick in foot traffic, although there’s no buyer yet. (There have also been callers asking whether the house is really ghost-free.)

The home, which is listed for 197,900 Canadian dollars (roughly US$195,000), fits a younger couple looking for a starter home, Mr. Palmer said, and the signs seem to hit the right chord.

The trio is trying other things as well. Mr. Palmer lowered the list price every week by $500 for four weeks, he said, to ensure that the local listing service kept the home at the top of the queue. Still, Mr. Palmer says the home is stuck at “a very saturated price point.” Saint John is in the province of New Brunswick.

In any event, Mr. Palmer is sticking with his strategy.

“I’m changing that sign every week until the thing sells.”

http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2012/07/02/listing-gone-stale-extol-the-virtues-of-ghost-free-living/ - 60k -

 
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-07 09:29:28

SHOUT
Otis Day and The Knights from Animal House

Well…………………I feel all right-

You know you make me want to (SHOUT)
Throw my hands back and (SHOUT)
Throw my head back and (SHOUT)
Kick my heels up and (SHOUT)-Come on now
Don’t forget to pay your bills
Don’t forget to pay-ay-ay-ay-ay (PAY YOUR BILLS)
Say it right now baby (SAY YOU WILL)
Come On-Come On (SAY YOU WILL)
Say it right heeeere-Come on y’all
(SAY) Say that you won`t live free (SAY) Your not a Deadbeat
(SAY) Say that you won`t be (SAY) You spent the money (SAY YOU DID)- Come on now (SAY YOU DID)-(x4)

I still remember, when your condo was 9 years old, yeah, yeah
You refied to the peak but the bottom felt so cold, yeah-yeah
And now that you’ve grown up , I want to let you know yeah-yeah
You want to live free-You need to let it go-

I want you to know, I said I want you to now right now
You’ve been a Deadbeat buddy, No one to blame but yourself, hey-hey
And if you ever live free, I don’t want nobody else no-no
I said I want you to know, I said I want you to know right now

You know you`d make me want to (SHOUT)
Yeah, yeah-Yeah, yeah, yeah
Come on now, Come on now
Oh all right, Oh all right
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah (x4)
All-All right (x4)

Now wait a minute- I feel a~l~l~l~l~l~l~l right-
Now that You’ve got a rent payment- I feel a~l~l~l~l~l~l~l right-
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah (x4)
Every time I think about you, And how you lived for free
You know it makes me want to (SHOUT)
Throw my hands back and (SHOUT)
Throw my head back and (SHOUT)
Kick my heels up and (SHOUT)
Come on now, Come on now
Hey-ey easy, Hey-ey easy
A little bit softer now etc.
A little bit louder now etc.

Shout now-jump up and shout now
Everybody out now- throw the Deadbeats out
out, out, out, Deadbeats, out out out Deadbeats out

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post