Welcome to the New Normal, the Lucky Ducky future that awaits any worker bees who fall off the hamster wheel and can’t get back on:
I thought technology was going to lead us to a future where everyone could work less, and yet still be better off.
Who moved my utopia?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-07-14 10:20:05
I thought technology was going to lead us to a future where everyone could work less, and yet still be better off.
Why was this such a common idea 30-40 years ago when now such ideas would be labeled as some type of “socialism”?
Could it be that the propaganda machine of the uber-rich corporatists have warped American’s minds?
Comment by tj
2012-07-14 10:26:15
I thought technology was going to lead us to a future where everyone could work less, and yet still be better off.
the benefits of technology can’t keep up with the damaging effects of higher taxes and more regulations. in other words, technology is stifled by big brotha government.
Comment by DBA Muggy
2012-07-14 12:55:51
“the benefits of technology can’t keep up with the damaging effects of higher taxes and more regulations. in other words, technology is stifled by big brotha government.”
Are you kidding me? The most egregious “end-arounds” are from the tech companies themselves. I took Steve Job’s death as an opportunity to highlight this, but nobody likes to think of their iPad as the reason why people live in polluted areas and throw themselves from the tops of buildings.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-14 14:48:44
Could it be that the propaganda machine of the uber-rich corporatists have warped American’s minds?
—
the benefits of technology can’t keep up with the damaging effects of higher taxes and more regulations. in other words, technology is stifled by big brotha government.
There’s your answer, Rio.
Comment by tj
2012-07-14 16:25:18
The most egregious “end-arounds” are from the tech companies themselves.
what “end-arounds” are you talking about?
I took Steve Job’s death as an opportunity to highlight this, but nobody likes to think of their iPad as the reason why people live in polluted areas and throw themselves from the tops of buildings.
technology can clean polluted areas. technology also can be misused, just like anything else.
compared to how we live now, our lives would seem unbearable without technology.
One of the greatest “technologies” of all time is the flushable toilet. Everything else is a rounding error on that invention as far as progress is concerned.
Whoever invents the self-cleaning toilet or bathroom (and they’re not that far off - I’m betting on the Japanese) has the ultimate money-maker on their hands.
Facebook, we never knew ya!
Anyone that rants about technology simply doesn’t understand how important extraordinarily small inventions are. Like the paper clip, or the zipper.
Seriously, people? Get some reading done, OK?
Comment by aragonzo
2012-07-14 18:37:11
When a job is automated, the wages that would have been paid to the worker now flow directly to the owner. Seeing as the objective of a business is to maximize profits, there is no incentive to share the wealth among those who are not the owners. The end result is the 1%/99% split that is happening now.
Comment by tj
2012-07-14 19:07:27
When a job is automated, the wages that would have been paid to the worker now flow directly to the owner.
and no matter what he does with his profit, it’s good for the economy.
yes, you can say that automation ends jobs, but another way to look at it, is that automation frees up labor to do other, more productive things. automation allows all of us to live better.
Seeing as the objective of a business is to maximize profits, there is no incentive to share the wealth among those who are not the owners.
“sharing the wealth” sounds nice, but ’sharing’ wealth destroys it, in the sense that it has to be accumulated again, to be able to do big things with it, like building factories etc.. and building factories, and investing or saving wealth creates more jobs.
The end result is the 1%/99% split that is happening now.
the 1%/99% thing, is a made up red herring. first, envy isn’t a very flattering demeanor. second, the wealthier a society becomes, the larger the gap will be. but as long as the poorest keep getting wealthier, (as they would with free market capitalism) why complain? are you willing to make the rich poorer, even if such actions hurt the poor more than the rich? would you be satisfied if the rich made a $100,000 less, even if the poor made a $1,000 less as a result?
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-07-14 19:10:11
And never lower prices for the buyer of the widget? Good grief! You guys slept through the computer revolution! Ever hear of the PC? My first computer had 64k memory and cost $4,000 in 1982, I clouded printer, monitor, disk drives.
Comment by aragonzo
2012-07-15 08:28:06
I’m not going to argue that automation doesn’t make goods cheaper. That is true and everyone who can afford to buy the goods benefits. The problem is about how many can afford to buy goods.
As for the growing wealth divide between rich and poor, it has nothing to do with envy and everything to do with a healthy economy. The middle and lower class are making more money now than they were 20 years ago but after adjusting for inflation, their standard of living is less. The floating boat analogy does not hold water because the tide does not raise all boats equally.
Comment by tj
2012-07-15 14:20:44
The middle and lower class are making more money now than they were 20 years ago but after adjusting for inflation, their standard of living is less.
true, but that’s because our economy has grown weaker. and automation doesn’t weaken an economy, it strengthens it.
The floating boat analogy does not hold water because the tide does not raise all boats equally.
it doesn’t matter if some boats are on a higher tide than others, as long as all boats are rising. but i agree, not all boats are rising now. all boats only rise in free market capitalism. we don’t have that anymore.
Actually I think the lower interest rates are helping housing.
It is the saver who cant find and yield and forced to buy facebook garbage.
The yield on the 10 yr is around 1.47%. so who is loaning money to uncle sam for 10 yrs and losing money with inflation?
Plus you have principal risk bigtime. If you plan to get that 1.47% for 10 years then dont worry. But if you need that money earlier and take out it could be worth substantially less. Lots of principal risk.
So who is buying all these treasuries?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Is A Loss
2012-07-14 07:53:17
Artificially low rates merely delay the inevitable for housing. Delaying the outcome results in an outcome far worse.
Old news my friend. What is new is that we never anticipated the MoneyChangers were willing exacerbate the correction to such extremes. It’s going to be very ugly.
You better have cash. You’re going to need it.
Comment by azdude
2012-07-14 08:05:36
if you want to keep being real negative than that’s your deal.
trying to look on the bright side and lower interest rates are helping the housing market.
I do not want to see a total crash. Things will get better.
Comment by combotechie
2012-07-14 08:06:34
“It is the saver who can’t find yield and forced to buy facebook garbage.”
And it is the money manager who has to at least earn his fee in order to keep his clients. Which is tough to do in this low return environment hence he needs to extend the risk part of the risk/reward ratio out a bit.
And just whose money is it that is at risk?
BTW, I know of money managers that are promising their clients ten-plus percent annual returns - and that’s after deducting their fees.
Comment by Housing Is A Loss
2012-07-14 08:13:03
if you want to keep being real negative than that’s your deal.
trying to look on the bright side and lower interest rates are helping the housing market.
I do not want to see a total crash. Things will get better.
You have a strange understanding of “help”.
And oddly, dramatically lower prices of housing is positive and bullish optimism.
‘if you want to keep being real negative than that’s your deal…trying to look on the bright side…’
You left out Homer Simpsons ‘rocket go now’.
Some things from yesterdays post:
‘The general rationale behind driving down interest rates is that such a policy is beneficial to the Canadian economy. Well, that all depends on how and by whom said benefits are defined…The temptation to go on a borrow-and-spend spree has proven irresistible to consumers who view low interest rates as ‘cheap money.’ One consequence is that the ratio of household debt to disposable income has risen by 40 per cent over the past decade: earlier this year it breeched an astounding 150 per cent, and continues to rise.’
‘Canada’s house prices have doubled since 2002. Low interest rates have fuelled a buying frenzy…and the consequence is that the market is now influenced by speculation rather than the needs of ordinary Canadian families seeking a home, more and more of whom are being excluded from that opportunity’
And: ‘Because households now borrow so much more, we’re actually paying banks almost twice as much in interest payments than we were back when interest rates were at 17 per cent – and it takes much longer to repay the average home loan’
Anything artificial merely distorts. And what was misunderstood years ago is still misunderstood today. That is, an artificially low rate environment for a few months is one thing, but having artificially low rates for years, with no end in sight, is an entirely different level of distortion.
Comment by polly
2012-07-14 09:39:20
I was going through some papers for the shred truck (I love it when big companies try to be good neighbors and sponsor events like that), and in 2006 I was making over 4% on a money market savings account. No wonder I had increased my withholding at work to make up the taxes I was going to have to pay on interest. Since then, it has ceased to be much of a problem.
Comment by azdude
2012-07-14 14:12:15
“And oddly, dramatically lower prices of housing is positive and bullish optimism.
You might want to pick yourself up off the floor.”
Are you one of those people just sitting back and b@tching about everything and hoping for doom and gloom?
Most of those kind of people missed out on a lot of opportunities to make money.
Comment by Housing Is A Loss
2012-07-14 18:09:14
Dramatically lower housing prices is gloom and doom? Really?
And “most of those kind of people” who bought a house 2003-2012 are underwater and sinking.
Because … throughout the land there is a shortage of …
… cash.
Comment by Harry Connick Jr Community College Graduate
2012-07-14 08:27:06
By the volume of CC offers I get in the mail, it feels like late 90’s.
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-07-14 09:27:38
Yup Combo Trillions of dollars in paper accounting fixes, yet they fight over giving the 99er’s 20 more weeks of unemployment cash.
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-07-14 09:29:15
Happiness is having a diverse portfolio so that you can load up on nearly 0% yielding 52-week T-bills and stare down the Feds. Yes, balanced out with municipals, series I savings bonds, and stock mutual funds and gold. One or two of those asset classes will balance out the losers.
Cash is king, in that sense.
Comment by combotechie
2012-07-14 09:43:28
“Cash is king, in that sense.”
It wasn’t all that long ago (before times became “interesting”) that debt was considered by many to be king, that anyone who was loaded up with cash or untapped home equity was considered to be somewhat of a fool.
I got read that speech in Aug 2008 literally one day before times got, shall we say, interesting?
Just a week later, I noticed that they couldn’t pick up their own tab and my father gallantly did saving them the embarassment.
Comment by DBA Muggy
2012-07-14 12:16:00
“Yet Rising Credit Card rates….dont you love it?”
Stop using your credit card.
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2012-07-14 14:15:10
I always use my credit cards. I pay them off. Going to an ATM is inconvenient. Paying the credit card balance online is convenient. Zero debt and lots o’ cash? You are king.
The Housing price should not be the economic priority,
Many bank in many country prefer lend money to property based asset,
rather than company performance.
The bank do not see how can price of property increase by 60% when salary only increase by 15%.
Bank will likely to lend money to Empty / Unoccupied real estate owner than to busy restaurant suppliers or growing movie producer.
The bank feel property is the safest way to go. And these causes property price to soars, and when economy slows, the bank get more nervous lending to non property based asset. Causing property prices increased astronomically high even though ordinary median income earner can not afford the housing market.
Once the bank lend too much to property sector, some property developers can not find cash flow to pay the interest, and the bank take over, the bank will reduce the interest rate to prevent their asset holding from falling in value.
Home buyers are burden with heavy debt, 40-50% of their income need to pay debt.
Bank, Central Bank, Big Corporation issue bonds, print money to improve market liquidity and channels most of it to property.
The property market become artificially high, and keep on rising despite no one can afford to buy. It will continue to rise until one day depositor, investor and everyone want cash out from the bank, then the bank need to sell the property at price market can afford, and that is 50% or 70% drop, which is the market value.
But then it was the worst nightmare in the economy comes in, Bank will increase interest rate, causing other sector on the economy to suffer, slash worker, to pay higher interest on their loan. And bank have to sell more property at lower price as interest rate increases, and economy slows down. Then you find property price drop by 70% and no one interested. It will settle down at price so low that developers can not produce more new houses with decent profit. Then there will be shortages in the property, and price stabilizes. And bank start pouring money again to developers when shortages caused housing price increase and a new cycle begin which will continue till the next crisis. The price will not come up and stay as the market think it should be, because the bank prefer to distort property prices, and government keep quiet as they got more tax when housing price shoot up.
Someone posted earlier in the week about NYC, and polly suggested I post my views on it so here goes.
Let’s start with the facts. There is absolutely no question that rents have gone up 10% this year (roughly - some more, some less.)
However, I remain convinced that the market is weak, and poised for a collapse.
Let’s start anecdotally. Right before the rent season started, they fired the super in my building and found a cheaper one. He was super efficient so this makes no sense. Then they raised the rents.
At the end of June, seven units got vacated. All of these were families with kids. What this is saying is that 10% raise put them in a budget crisis to the point that they moved.
The vacancies have not been filled as of yet.
I know this is anecdotal of just one landlord but it seems to me that this is a scramble of cash.
Also, the credit market for buying is incredibly tight. Very few banks are loaning out jumbo’s and they will go over your finances with a toothcomb.
So there seems to the equivalent of a “short squeeze” in the rental market. Again, this is not a sign of strength.
Also, the layoffs on Wall St. keep coming. Most are permanent as in these people will never work there again EVER. Whatever the beliefs on this blog, there is regulation coming down and the era of large leveraged profits is gone forever.
The global macroeconomic situation is also deteriorating. There is no doubt that the US is gonna go into a double-dip.
Does this seem like the right backdrop to be buying?
Thanks, FPSS. I was interested in your take on it. I seem to be stuck in DC and I can live with that, but my brother and sister-in-law and their kids are in NYC and given their current school situation, they are staying put. They don’t have to rent, but the situation in New York impacts them and I’m always interested in your perspective.
I know one couple (whose wine I freely partake of) have just purchased for $1.1M.
I think they are doing financially unoptimal stuff but they are buying into a “lifestyle”. Is it “disastrous” or “unoptimal”. Hard to say.
It helps them that they are in one of the best public school districts and their eldest child goes there. So I could see why someone would be willing to “guarantee” that outcome instead of paying for private education.
However, I still think it’s boneheaded. They could just rent. They’re gonna pay almost double their rent for the dubious pleasure of owning.
But what do I know? I’m just a renter who can run a speadsheet.
My sister-in-law’s father was a specialist doctor who was very generous to his youngest child and only daughter. And I’m pretty sure he bought it for her around the bottom of the last RE trough in NY. Plus their oldest just got into one of the citywide G&T schools. They aren’t going anywhere.
Well, if he bought it for her, what’s the big deal?
Surely all they have to do is pay the co-op fees and property taxes.
And if they can’t pay that, what are they even doing there?
Unless they pulled out “equity” in which case they are the classic debt-hobo’s. What can I say?
Comment by polly
2012-07-14 10:23:14
It isn’t a big deal. But with childcare expenses and nursery school fees on top of co-op fees, it isn’t a piece of cake either. It will get easier once the munchkin is in school full time. They have a few more years where they feel seriously constrained. The G&T school is a nice bonus, but the kids were going to be in public school after preschool no matter what.
Comment by polly
2012-07-14 10:28:09
And, no, no equity was pulled out at all. She redid the kitchen right before they met, but she did it by having a roommate and saving up for it from the roommate money. Totally responsible, but kids are expensive, no matter how responsible you are.
Substitute with childcare and day-care. Temporarily.
Did they save for that ahead of time? Or just “hope” that the little bundle of joy came attached with gold bars.
My heart bleeds for them. I’ll hire a violinist from Juilliard to play them a sad tune!
Comment by polly
2012-07-14 11:49:22
They got pregnant right after the wedding. Age required they not spend a lot of extra time saving up. My brother works for his commuting costs and the child care. It is the right decision. You don’t give up a tenured position to stay home with the kids and end up with no job at the end of the process. She makes more than he does. Also, she stayed home for a year with each kid, and their savings suffered, but it was the right decision for the kids. As I said before, kids are expensive. Kids in New York City are very expensive when you are trying to keep up to middle class standards.
Kids and NYC don’t mix unless you got a lot of dough. That’s the bottom line.
They got dealt an excellent card. Paid for apartment in NYC, and access to excellent public schools. (Some of the best even paid for by other people!)
So short of a lot of whining, the world’s tiniest violin is playing a dirge for them.
Do they know how to cook? Do they cook each day or just rely on takeout? Is the academic pulling his weight?
Short of specifics, given the absurdly handsome cards that they were dealt, I am underwhelmed. I only hear whining.
Comment by howiewowie
2012-07-14 13:47:47
Just how common is this occurrence I’ve been running into quite a lot? By that I mean people having houses bought or given to them by parents, grandparents etc.
I’ve learned of three in my circle of friends within the last few months. They are all solidly middle class, but have homes way out of their price ranges. One of them even has the grandparents paying for the kids schooling at the most exclusive private school in town.
My wife and I are always grousing about how impossible it would be to save 20 percent for a downpayment and then keep learning of these people that have everything just given to them. We can’t compete.
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-07-14 14:09:44
We can’t compete.
Which is all according to plan. Not your plan, of course. But your plan doesn’t count.
Comment by polly
2012-07-14 14:24:26
Where is the whining, honey? I said I was interested in your perspective on what is going on in NY rents and prices because I had family there and they were staying. Where is that a complaint about anything? Real estate values will impact them because other people in the building bought and much more recently. It could be an issue if a lot of people in the building end up underwater. Probably not a tragedy, but it could influence their lives. For example, the obnoxious jerks downstairs might not be able to sell if prices go down too much too quickly. They would dearly love for the a–holes to be able to move. It could impact their lives if people get so desperate for the good school that the school is forced to stop sibling preferences, which is a horrible system but one that currently works to their benefit since their older child got in.
Is money tight for them? Yup. Why? Because they are prioritizing their kids for a few years. Lots of people do that. Ask Muggy.
And, yes, they cook. The favor at their wedding was a collection of the recipes they cooked for each other while dating. I don’ think they cook every day, but they certainly do most days.
Now whining? Whining would be if they were moaning to me about not being able to take fancy vacations. They don’t. Never have. No whining involved. I do wish she would stop lecturing me about buying a new car. I don’t want one. Can’t seem to get that across.
You could see that here in LIC in 2009…owning $3700 renting $2200 Hunters point, L Haus made no secret of this on their website, yet people still bought them.
————
They’re gonna pay almost double their rent for the dubious pleasure of owning.
Hmm I think you are so right. I expect a big drop in housing prices next year despite this year’s somewhat (dead cat) bounce.
People were talking about the election the other day and predictions and preceptions. I still pick Romney by a landslide. I prefer him. Lesser of two evils. But I go by the ecomomy. I did not want Obama but knew he would win partly because of the cycle and seasons of politics. I think his support this time is very shallow. Here in Arlington, suburban Boston, vitually no Obama or Elizabeth Warren signs or bumper stickers. Could be too early. But even more ominous for Obama. I have noticed that the bumper stickers from the last election have dissappeared. People are taking them off their cars rather than leaving them. 15% real unemployement not a game winner.
Thanks, Puss.
The only activity I’m seeing in the Greater Grapevine region is in the cheerleading press, and nothing at all has sold here in my little burg for 17 months. (At height of the bubble 4-5 properties per month were changing hands.) So many migrants have left the state that the highways around here are all-but deserted.
Have no hard figures, but I imagine the rental market in the valley ’round Bakersfield is pretty stagnant with many folks either moving on or hunkering in. What I’m seeing here in the semi-underground is four or five non-related people moving into one rental where previously only one or two lived there.
Waiting for the inevitable influx from the New Dust Bowl developing in TX and OK. Only this time all the field work (real and metaphoric) has been mechanized….
Up valley, the 70’s house I’ve been tracking in Tahoe finally sold after three years off and on the market for 30% below its 2004 purchase price. Whomever bought it is going to have 40 years of ski-country maintenance catch-up on their hands.
I was doing a little figuring in Quicken yesterday, and realized something that somewhat shocked me (even given my screenname). I’ve mentioned it before, taxes are, by far, my biggest yearly expense. However, the thing that I’d never done before was calculate all my taxes (income, real estate, sales, tolls, and “added taxes” on things like flights and rental cars) against my income. My total taxes paid last year were almost exactly 50% of our income. I guess that’s not all that shocking given that in the 33% bracket, anything you buy that’s taxable is immediately 40% tax. Add in things that are “pure tax” (RE taxes being the big one, but last year I had a huge “transfer tax” payment as well) and I suppose I should have realized that only about 50% of my salary is actually available for my “personal” use.
I work 4 hours a day for me, and the rest of the day for the government. I’m going to have to try not to think of it that way, but, just out of curiousity, has anyone else ever done this kind of calculation? Do you think that 50% total tax burden is a “reasonable” amount? Are you surprised that it can get that high in the “upper-middle” income brackets (I had no income in the top bracket last year).
Fail. He counts the employer share of FICA as a tax on his gross income even though it doesn’t come out of his paycheck. If he is going to include the employer share, then he has to tack it onto his gross income.
He looks at marginal tax rate on income (33%), not actual tax paid. If you are single and make 100K, you pay 10% on the first $8500 of taxable income. Based on the tax table and his standard deduction calculation of $9600, you would pay $18,936 in income taxes. So the effective income tax rate is really 19%.
He includes health insurance as an effectve tax and calculates it as 15%. If you are young and single, you can get a catastrophic insurance policy for much less. When I looked at it for my 24 year old (as part of the decision as to whether to carry him on my insurance), I could find one for $95 per month.
Just on those issues, he overstates the taxes by 14% + 7.5% + 15%, which brings the effective tax rate down to 42%. And that doesn’t account for the state and property taxes, which are local and variable. For property taxes, it is not just dependent on rates, but also on property value.
I’m not in the top tax bracket. But assume the 33% bracket, spending a dollar on anything that has sales tax, you’re already at the 40% market. If that dollar is spent on something “travel related” (as many of my dollars are), there’s big time extra taxes on that which can easily take you above 50%. That’s just the marginal tax on a dollar earned and spent, it doesn’t take into account any of the “fixed” taxes (the big one being RE tax, but last year I had a big transfer tax payment as well).
Forget about my situation for a second, do you think it’s “reasonable” that someone in this country earning 1M/yr (which is FAR more than I earn) pays 500K in taxes? Do you think that’s a “fair” number, too high or too low?
Seems pretty fair to me. You aren’t talking about paying 50% for fire and police protection. You are paying for all the services you receive from every level of government everywhere. Travel taxes are high because tourists don’t vote. Are you including taxes you paid on your honeymoon and the sales taxes you paid on that monster wedding you had because your girlfriend needed you to pay 10’s of thousands of bucks on a party? Transfer tax, so that is for the purchase of a half a million dollar house?
Firstly, someone making $1M in Manhattan would pay about $400K in taxes total not $500K (roughly speaking - I’m not gonna pull out the tax tables!)
So you are wrong to begin with.
(And that’s Manhattan not the rest of the country so you need to add that in too.)
Secondly, very few people make that kinda income as “working income”. At that level, there’s a lot more capital gains and tax-free dividends so the number $1M is dubious to begin with.
Lastly, since you don’t make this income, why are you so generously concerned about the welfare of the rich? Don’t you have better things to be worrying about?
Like the housing market, for example?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-07-14 09:51:19
I think he is adding in all the sales taxes he paid in addition to the income taxes. Plus real estate taxes, real estate transfer taxes and travel taxes. Then he added in tolls and airport fees and whatever.
So federal income taxes, state income taxes if any, local taxes other than property, property taxes, sales taxes (paid for a huge wedding last year), travel taxes and fees, transfer taxes on buying a big house, tolls on toll roads, gas taxes, and so on and so on and so on.
As I said, I’m surprised it is only 50%. And I think I backed out that his income was a minimum of $350K, possibly a lot more depending on how much was tax free interest and/or low tax dividends and cap gains. Plus with the wedding, he may have spent more than his after tax income last year upping the sales taxes.
In the 50’s high earners were taxed at 70% of a big portion of their income . What evolved was more and more tax breaks and than the lowering of the tax rates .
I think one of the biggest complaints about taxes these days is how the money is spent . Nobody thinks that the lobby system Politicial machine is looking out for the real health of
the Majority Population ,or the health of American economy in terms of what benefits the most people in the Grand Bee Hive .
The natural thought people have is ,”How are these taxes benefiting me in the scheme of things ,how did the Banker /investment house bailouts really benefit me ?”
People ask ,”How are all these Wars and the Military machine really benefiting me in the final analysis ?”
One could say for decades that tax money was invested in America from 1945 to 1970 maybe . Than apparently it became a game of the special interest lobbying system of Politics on who would benefit and who wouldn’t ,without the concern of the entirety of the systems ,or whats good for America as a whole .Globalism emerged and this no doubt has eroded away at the tax base of America . Did anybody think about how outsourcing and outmanufacturing would take tax dollars and jobs outside this Country ? Did anybody think about how “Free Trade ” would end up reducing commerce to the lowest wage Nations becoming the producers and the monopoly ,such as China ?
In a desperate attempt to fund by raising taxes ,right at a time when less jobs are available ,it will take more buying power out of the hands of the consumers ,along with inflation
doing its damage .But health care will go up in price in spite of it breaking the backs of the average Americans.
Do the Politicians care if they set the stage for us going off the cliff ,they only know how to be loyal to their lobbyist .
Just look at what is happening in Greece today and it might be the blueprint of what is to come in the United States .
Forget about my situation for a second, do you think it’s “reasonable” that someone in this country earning 1M/yr (which is FAR more than I earn) pays 500K in taxes? Do you think that’s a “fair” number, too high or too low?
If someone earning $50,000 per year has to pay $25,000 in taxes, then I don’t see anything unreasonable with that scenario.
I am single, no kids and in the 28% bracket and trust me, I pay a lot of taxes. I am trying to save for my retirement and between wall street skimming off my 401K and taxes, I am having a hard time getting ahead of inflation.
Your figures seem right.
I pay:
Car rental taxes
Sales taxes
Capital gains taxes (short term and long term)
Dividend taxes
State income taxes
Federal income taxes
Utility taxes (5% of my cable fee is FCC fee and license fee, ten percent of my electric bill is tax)
tSA fee on airline tickets
I did not check my Verizon cell phone service taxes.
A porton of my rent goes to property taxes
“green” taxes at auto service centers for disposing of my old tires and oil.
Polly loves all these taxes.
I don’t. Private enterprise is much more efficient than government. Always. Abolish taxes.
It isn’t clear to me on the phone bill what is a direct tax to me vs. what the phone company calls a fee for “their” tax. I don’t think we should count pass throughs as our personal tax.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-07-14 11:11:21
vs. what the phone company calls a fee for “their” tax.
Some of what they tack on and call “fees” is not even for “their tax”—it’s just a revenue stream for them. Somewhere along the line, they discovered that if they make it look like a tax based on the location that they list it on the bill, then people don’t consider it in their rate-comparisons.
Oh yeah, the people younger than me should consider social security and medicare as taxes they will never be paid back. I may get money that I put in and maybe not. I don’t intend to draw from social security until 70.
Add 10%.
So I think the blogger above who said 75% is closer to the right percentage. Our economy would have a high GDP, perhaps 8% if we privatize it. We have more a planned economy than a capitalist economy.
My federal and state (Mass) income tax is about 35% including social “security.” And I figure indirect taxes all along the the value chain add about 30% to cost of everything I buy. I save half my post tax income. Live very modestly off the other half so figure my real tax rate approaches 45%.
If you are counting the employer’s half of SS and Medicare, you are already counting more than most people do. If you do that, you at least need to add that employer’s share into your salary before you do the division and specify that you are including it when no ordinary person looking at a pay stub does.
“If you are counting the employer’s half of SS and Medicare, you are already counting more than most people do. If you do that, you at least need to add that employer’s share into your salary before you do the division and specify that you are including it when no ordinary person looking at a pay stub does.”
This is one of the great propaganda scams the govt pulls. SS tax is 12.4%, employees pays 6.2, employers pay 6.2. But the great unwashed masses think the employer 6.2 is “free”. They don’t realize that the employee still pays it indirectly since the 6.2% paid by the employer would otherwise be paid in the form of wages, other benefits, etc. Same with the 2.9% Medicare tax paid 1.45/1.45 between employer/employee.
Just like any other tax by companies, it is never actually paid by companies but simply passed on to consumers/employees.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jbunniii
2012-07-14 16:23:01
Just like any other tax by companies, it is never actually paid by companies but simply passed on to consumers/employees.
I don’t disagree with this point of view, but can’t I equally well argue that I, as an employee, do not actually pay my own taxes, but rather I pass them along to my employer? After all, they could pay me a lot less if there weren’t so many taxes taken out of my paycheck before it hits my bank account.
Oh yes, I take great pleasure in telling people in the working class that about 40% of their incomes are taken by all taxes and fees paid yearly to all levels of their government. At the federal level alone, they pay SS, income and Medicare taxes. Our state level tax is for income and sales. Our local taxes also hit income, sales and property. And there are all those little taxes paid on your utilities. I keep telling people that it’s the easiest thing in the world, once you list ‘em all, and then total ‘em up. A spreadsheet is great for this. And you’re going to find at least 40% of “your” income (incl. capital gains) vanishes into the great maw of bloated, two-party, fiscally liberal government. Then I laugh and ask why they aren’t voting Libertarian. Great fun (for me, at least).
At these tax levels, if we were real men, we’d have had a second revolution by now. But due to that good ol’ opiate of the masses….
You admit to working for the government about half time (and presumably you would be earning somewhere around half your income from the government) and then you complain about high taxes based on dubious mathematics? Go cry elsewhere.
Dubious because you are mistaking marginal tax rates with overall taxation. I am also somewhere in the same bracket but pay only around 20% federal tax - no deductions etc.
I wanted to share a story about my experience with the true state of the Phoenix housing market. Listening to the MSM would have one believe that it’s all hunky dory out here, but that’s not the case. Has it improved from last year? Yes. But we also saw the same “improvement” in 2010 only to hit new lows in 2011. Is it really different this time?
I’ve been renting a seasonal residence in the east valley. The landlord is an out-of-state speculator, who purchased (cash), went down to Home Depot, bought the cheapest everything he could, and did a halfway decent renovation of the house, about $15k worth of materials and labor, and marked up the price $50k and put it back on the market. He was optimistic it would sell quickly.
Fast forward one year, after sitting on the market with well over 100 showings and three offers that fell through at the last minute, frustrated, he pulled it off the market and is going to wait it out until the market is even better next year.
This is but one story - but I gather it is not uncommon. In the area, listings are dropping because investors have snatched up many properties, driving the median asking price up 35% in the past year, but note that it does NOT mean that houses have appreciated 35% in the past year. The papers would lead one to believe that, but just because the mix of homes have changed and the numbers are skewed away from the 30k condos that were common last year. Also, people have taken their homes off the market, thinking that it will be even better next year. My personal belief is that in the next couple of months, some of the more recent investors will get cold feet and decide to sell which will precipitate the next leg down and alleviate the so-called inventory shortage.
Synopsis - Investors buying properties do not create a stable market.
I picked a great weekend to return home to Phoenix and avoided three weekends of searing heat. Monsoon is going on here in Phoenix. My air conditioner is working well. I was out early this morning for my 4100 yard swim. Will go out again for my vegetarian lunch at Whole Foods Market. But then stay in through the evening.
Will be in Phoenix for five days in August and two days in September. Then be back more frequent weekends after that through next May.
It is like that in central oregon too. So much anectotal evidence is starting to sound like data. I think when the middle of the market needs to sell en masse it will push the bottom down. However…
Low end gets multiple offers same daiy it lists, but the middle market is not like that. Here is a tale of two foreclosures both purchased in 2007.
A 270k home was just resold for 162k(22k over list in two days), for a loss in value of $108k. But it listed for 140 and sold for 162k.
Wife’s condo was purchased for 392k and it resold after foreclosure at 177k(30k less than it listed for after 6 months). Total loss in value over $215k. It was also pulled off the market at least once as it attracted no offers at 200k.
So the spread between these properties in 2007 was $122k. Now the spread between these two in 2012 is $15k. Personally I would prefer to buy a luxury unit with more square footage built in 2007, than a older beat up house without central heating or AC and also a messed up septic drainfield, but investors don’t care so much as they both would rent out for around $1100 per month, incidentally 10% more than last year.
There was only a tiny amount of corn picked fresh this morning but I bought it all. The hippie ol’ lady was like, “You’re buying it all. What about other people?” and I was like, “What do I care? I’m paying for it, right?”
Some awesome fresh onions, basil, and a delicious corn soup was made. Chilling in the fridge now.
I know some of you have regular access to amazing corn but it’s really a pleasure for us urban types.
Oh, and on that story above, if there’s anybody I haven’t offended, I apologize.
We used to grow organic sweet corn. It was a great loss leader, but a royal pain as it was heavy and tomatoes/strawberries made more sense and took up less room in the truck. The worms got to most ears and the buyers picked thru it. Worms everywhere, but who wants to pay to put a drop of oil on each ear to prevent damage on a crop that loses money anyway? But as much as I hated selling it, eating it was great!
Also, if you don’t want to ingest too many heavy metals, avoid organic celery. So much organic copper sulfate needs to be sprayed as fungicide that the tips turn blue. Sticking to the scale of gardeners rather than the “whole wallet”, corporate, organic truck farmers(they come to the market as well for the retail bucks) seems prudent. Having worked for both types, organic and monoculture are two terms that don’t combine well.
But if you wanted to farm for whole foods, you gotta step up to their scale, and also know they will dump you if the farmer up the way undercuts you by a buck. Which is how I convinced a truck farmer to let me take his goods to farmers market in the 90s. The big boys were taking over wholesale, making the pains of retail worth it. The hippy dippy garden farmer I had worked for out of college went under due to farming for lofty principles; too bad as our berries were off the hook!
I bought corn, spring peas, tomatoes, sage, basil.
There’s a local fisherman so I bought a dozen clams too. He’s great. He knows me really well so he always tells me what’s really good. Never been wrong ever!
My nickname at the market is “tomato man” because I’m really crazy about excellent tomatoes. I’ve been going there for 10+ years. They all know me.
Oh, and there’s a raspberry granita in the freezer!
my ex-boss got into heirlooms after I left. Grows them in ghetto greenhouse tunnels so he gets them early and keeps em coming to December or a freeze. Of course Santa Barbara has great weather. And I do miss the peas, or having 100 types of veggies to cook from. Don’t miss the boxes or bagging.
We had some freaks that would spend hundreds every week. People who wear gas masks out in public kind of freaks. Of course we did not refer to them that way when selling them market up food. They were our bread and butter.
Are they open before it gets light? Seeing as you were buying at the crack of dawn?
We used to pick berries and corn for same day sale; but we wouldn’t get them delivered to the market until around 8. luckily the market opened at 8:30. But I know NY is different.
That said, if it was picked even the day before how could a foodie like you be satisfied??
Oh yeah you are urban chic so; therefore you have to settle for less than the freshest ingredients.
I’m not urban chic. I want good food, and I cook daily from scratch.
I make my own broths, I can my tomatoes at the end of summer. I have friend’s help my haul my tomatoes at the end of summer so they can all get my homemade tomato past.
I also write a serious food blog (which some regulars here know about.)
So you know nothing about me.
And they get there at about 7:00am. I’ve been there before at 6:45 and it was awesome. Do you know how great it is to see Manhattan totally deserted?
I really wanna see this “oh-your’e-so-urban” type actually answer a few tough cooking questions!
Comment by mikeinbend
2012-07-14 17:41:24
I ain’t know nuthing bout stringy pea pods cuz we just ate them raw. Shell and all. Of course I ain’t talking English, or snow, rather sugar snap peas.
Yeah I heard about your blog but you still did not get fresh pricked corn. Sorry
I’m talking shell peas. You’re evading as might be obvious.
You haven’t a clue.
All these salt-of-the-earth, mono-lingual types are all the same. Push through the extent of their ignorance and they collapse faster than a classical souflée;.
The other option is to cloak it in patriotic dogsh!te. There’s nothing wrong with a steak for me, etc.
No clue whatsoever. “All hat, no cattle,” as they say!
Comment by aragonzo
2012-07-14 19:03:59
Isn’t it spelled “soufflé”? Just how mult-lingual are you?
I never dodged/ claimed knowing what to do with the shell of peas (English); just the sugar snaps. We tried English a few times but we could bring 200 lbs of snaps at $5/lb; a single box of English just took up room in the truck that could be better utilized for profit.
The people, the great unwashed, as it were, just were not interested in anything but Sugar Snap Peas. I told you if they were English peas I would not know what to do with the shells. I am alright as a cook but know little of haute cuisine. But arguing with the narcissist is in vain. The only time you were ever wrong must have been the time you thought you were wrong. So I lose, but you still get corn quickly turning to starch.
I was simply telling you if you bought corn early A.M., it was most likely picked yesterday. Starch starts to form as soon as you pick it; you are settling based upon availability due to your unfortunate location for getting boutique produce year round. What do you do for fresh produce in the winter?
I have grown radish; honking 3 foot Daikons, parsnips, garlic, turnips, french breakfast radishs, and round red ones. Mandarins to mulberries. Mixed greens and baby spinach. Orange and red and striped beets, Nantes carrots Purple kohlradi, dandelion greens, celeriac radiccio,Dinosour(black) kale, pimiento pepper, pickles, english, and regular cukes, summer and winter squash. Eggplant, japanese eggplant, basil, cilantro. And scores of others A lot of the specialty items I really never wanted to mess with as I lived within a cornocopia for a decade. And we could trade with other farmes to get what we wanted to eat that was not grown in the field such as honey, eggs, etc. I may not know food but I know about growing it organically.
Mostly I liked to eat raw foods and would compost English peas shells; which is another legimate use for them. If I still ran a farmer’s market booth I would ask you for a recipe, but I don’t, so I wont. And my wife cooks now that I have taught her the basics.
I always giggled when we sent strawberries clear across the country so NY could have “fresh” organic strawberries. Sometimes $36 per case wholesale, and the berries were harder and blander to withstand shipping. For the markets we had a different variety that were great but we could not ship. Again the urban folks need to settle for high priced ripoff organics in your off season.
Comment by mikeinbend
2012-07-14 21:17:49
Mono lingual??
Me speakee spanish and french
Take your ball and go home now.
Comment by mikeinbend
2012-07-14 22:03:27
Oh yeah
You have yet to even scratch the surface regarding the depths of my ignorance.
Keep dishing it out and making assumptions about others while telling others they know nothing of you somehow you know everything about them. I am surprised that some random from the web could make you angry. Dish out all you want but maybe learn to take it too; it’s good for you!
As a foodie, do you know the only whole grain that provides a perfect protein? there is a reason rice and beans are served together as neither of those are perfect proteins and thusly combined
Why does oxide get the raz for buying, while Jethro gets a house-warming party?
What’s the diff?
Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-07-13 23:36:56
Seriously? You haven’t figured that out yet?
I’ll tell you what….. show me a single post where Jethro rationalized paying inflated prices for a depreciating asset.
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT [aka Jethro]
2012-07-12 16:05:49
Being underwater doesn`t scare or bother me one bit. I lived and worked through it before when I bought my first place. My goal is not to make money on this house, my goal is to pay it off in the next 13 years. I have a lot more confidence in my ability to do that than I have in our elected officials, Fed chiefs, banksters and Deadbeats to do the right thing and let it go.
He didn’t go about justifying his own decision publicly.
That’s a very female thing to do. First make a decision, and find all the evidence to support it while ignoring all the evidence that is accumulating. (There are exceptions like ahansen, polly, or even my sister but yes! I stand by statement that this is a very female thing to do.)
For example, foreclosure inventory, student loans, etc.
I find “sfrenter” equally annoying. She hasn’t a clue.
My sister lives in SF, and yes, money is flowing fast and furious but a stable market that does not make. It’s just “buy now or get priced out forever” in a more modern guise.
I find “sfrenter” equally annoying. She hasn’t a clue.
A clue about what? If you’re going to be dismissive, at least elaborate a little, otherwise it’s just cheap noise.
Honestly I’ve been on this blog all these years simply because I have been trying to find a stable place to live.
The only reason we started looking to buy is because finally PITI would be less than our current rent. (hey! I learned that here on HBB!!). And our landlord drives us nuts. We really are just what we seem to be: a family of 4 that needs a long-term place to live.
Renting has become more and more expensive. I know we pay more to live in SF, and also know that I do not want to spend more than 25% of our income on housing. We have considered relocating, but with 20+ years combined seniority in our teaching jobs, kids in schools we like, and a city we love, doing so as we approach our 50’s in an uncertain economy (whole lotta pink slips in most school districts) seems foolish.
I have noticed that the majority of people who are really insistent on “don’t buy” usually already have stable housing. Or no kids. Renting and saving is awesome if you live in a place where renting is cheap.
We’re hanging on and won’t buy unless PITI is less than our rent. If it takes so long that we see another leg down in the housing market, then that’s great. It probably will.
I find “sfrenter” equally annoying. She hasn’t a clue.
Well my first response didn’t show up, but maybe that’s for the best, ‘cuz faster’s dismissive tone without any explanation is just cheap noise anyways.
The best thing I learned from reading HBB all these years was to wait to buy until PITI was less than renting. Which is exactly why we are looking now.
That, and the fact that we really just need a place to live without a nutty, meddling, aging landlord.
The folks that are most vociferous about “don’t buy now no matter what” tend to be people who have either stable rentals or do not have kids and dogs and a solid community that really matters to them.
As it happens, we may not find a place that fits my criteria (2+ bedroom for less than $2200 month PITI), although I’ll be damned if that wasn’t an option last fall. And the market may well take another leg down (fingers crossed) before we find what we want, which would be great…
…but the idea that anyone who does not want to be a permarenter nor move to Oil City doesn’t have a clue is mighty condescending.
If Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell finds you “annoying” I would consider it a badge of honor. You did not jump into buying, you are being cautious while looking to do what is best for your family and give them stability while very powerful forces fight against you. And you are right, some people shooting their mouths off do not have kids and dogs and a solid community that really matters to them.” I don`t think some people take into consideration that kids do grow up and you may not have 15 years start to finish to wait this thing out.
Now Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell as far as “That’s a very female thing to do.” #1 My statement about being underwater was an answer to a post about buying a “depreciating asset”.
#2 If you post sh#t like…
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2012-07-14 12:21:26
I bought corn, spring peas, tomatoes, sage, basil.
There’s a local fisherman so I bought a dozen clams too. He’s great. He knows me really well so he always tells me what’s really good. Never been wrong ever!
My nickname at the market is “tomato man” because I’m really crazy about excellent tomatoes. I’ve been going there for 10+ years. They all know me.
Oh, and there’s a raspberry granita in the freezer
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2012-07-14 15:59:50
Hey, I went drinking with my buds and I was pretty hungover but I still got to the market at the crack of dawn to get the corn.
And then say….
“That’s a very female thing to do.”
Expect replies like this…
I know we grew up on different planets. When I “went drinking with my buds” I usually woke up with a young lady whose acquaintance I made while I was out. Besides getting pulled back into the sack for another aerobic workout before we parted ways, had I got up at the crack of dawn and went skipping off to the market to get corn, spring peas and basil I am pretty sure these young ladies would have been making a doctors appointment to get an AIDS test. Not to mention trying to explain why I knew a local fisherman so well and why he called me “tomato man”.
“First make a decision, and find all the evidence to support it while ignoring all the evidence that is accumulating”
I would contend that this is a very human thing to do. It is called rationalization and I expect that most of us are guilty of it at one time or another, regardless of gender.
Hey alpha, do you work for NBC? You left something out.
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-12 16:05:49
Being underwater doesn`t scare or bother me one bit. I lived and worked through it before when I bought my first place. My goal is not to make money on this house, my goal is to pay it off in the next 13 years. I have a lot more confidence in my ability to do that than I have in our elected officials, Fed chiefs, banksters and Deadbeats to do the right thing and let it go.
Now having said that I would not want to be underwater as far as the last owner of the UNKNOWN Casa. Cause if it goes to 0 I wouldn`t be that far underwater.
——————————————————————————-
But I am getting a good laugh out of this, cause it seems like somebody put some pepper in your vaseline.
WHO PUT THE PEPPER IN THE VASELINE by Barefoot- YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhGFNmrjMDs - 125k - Cached - Similar pages
Dec 28, 2009 … from the “Barefoot & Andy” LP BAREFOOT RECORDS BF-5704 1970s? STEREO .
Went to the Farmers Market this morning. Good news, they now accept, EBT, SNAP and WIC as payment. And they even had a representative from the state there to show you how easy it is to use your EBT/SNAP/WIC cards to purchase items.
I know of a dude who just bought an AR15 from a guy I know. $200 of the payment was with his SNAP card. They are grocery shopping together this weekend and next. The guy who bought the gun and is paying with SNAP is about 30 years old and lives with his parents. My imagination is not good enough to make this sh#t up.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2012-07-14 22:06:52
I’d trade beer or cigerettes for SNAP cards 50 cents on the dollar if I could then use the SNAP card at a farmers market.
But no I shouldn’t be buying losers smokes and beer which is why I never give homeless money just snacks I carry in my car.
But someone will
Comment by BetterRenter
2012-07-15 04:21:13
U.T., you can use your food stamps to purchase a bow and arrow set in Alaska, since hunting there is used for food.
Maybe because if they voted libertarian they could have ended working 60+ hours a week and they would not have any social security because there would not be any. Do not get me wrong. The problem is not the taxes, the problem is what you get for it.
Being libertarian nowadays makes your life harder. Everything is regulated whether you like it or not. The so called invisible hand is a fallacy. It has always been. Why? Because if you do not regulate, some people behave in auto-destructive (race to the bottom) way while others take the opportunity to make money of it.
The reality we live in is much more complicated than you can predict by being libertarian. Regulation is the correct answer to it. People prefer to reduce the risks and are not rational in their choices. Health insurance, food stamps etc. is the (flawed) way how to help those who are poor. And the rest pays for it. Get over it!
Uhm, excuse me, JohnB. The problem isn’t the taxes? 40% at least in the Midwest, and easily 50% in major urban areas? Like I said, a tax rate of HALF would have had the 1700s men grabbing their muskets. And yet we put up with it, not because we gain ‘benefits’ from having half our incomes stolen each year, but because we’re too afraid of losing what little we have when we revolt.
The government is supposed to be a management layer. Such a layer is supposed to be minimal, so that the people get their work done and their lives lived. Accepting our level of taxation like this is like accepting an OS on your computer that sucks up half the computer’s ability to do work, all on its own.
Libertarians know what works. Government is supposed to enable stable society; not be a vampire upon it. We’ve gotten far, far away from the natural Libertarian state of the design of the Republic, which is why stuff like the housing bubble happened, and why huge government debts happened, and why bailouts and corporate welfare happened. And it’s clearly destroying our culture.
Also, I do not know where this idea comes from that Libertarianism means “no regulation”. It means MINIMAL regulation, and that regulation is 100% enforced. It means that govt is put back into its proper role: A management layer. An enabler, not a consumer.
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
is it different this time?
Yes, it’s worse.
Yes, it’s worse.
Welcome to the New Normal, the Lucky Ducky future that awaits any worker bees who fall off the hamster wheel and can’t get back on:
The Sharp, Sudden Decline of America’s Middle Class
They had good, stable jobs - until the recession hit. Now they’re living out of their cars in parking lots.
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-sharp-sudden-decline-of-americas-middle-class-20120622
Welcome to the New Normal, the Lucky Ducky future that awaits any worker bees who fall off the hamster wheel and can’t get back on:
I thought technology was going to lead us to a future where everyone could work less, and yet still be better off.
Who moved my utopia?
I thought technology was going to lead us to a future where everyone could work less, and yet still be better off.
Why was this such a common idea 30-40 years ago when now such ideas would be labeled as some type of “socialism”?
Could it be that the propaganda machine of the uber-rich corporatists have warped American’s minds?
I thought technology was going to lead us to a future where everyone could work less, and yet still be better off.
the benefits of technology can’t keep up with the damaging effects of higher taxes and more regulations. in other words, technology is stifled by big brotha government.
“the benefits of technology can’t keep up with the damaging effects of higher taxes and more regulations. in other words, technology is stifled by big brotha government.”
Are you kidding me? The most egregious “end-arounds” are from the tech companies themselves. I took Steve Job’s death as an opportunity to highlight this, but nobody likes to think of their iPad as the reason why people live in polluted areas and throw themselves from the tops of buildings.
Could it be that the propaganda machine of the uber-rich corporatists have warped American’s minds?
—
the benefits of technology can’t keep up with the damaging effects of higher taxes and more regulations. in other words, technology is stifled by big brotha government.
There’s your answer, Rio.
The most egregious “end-arounds” are from the tech companies themselves.
what “end-arounds” are you talking about?
I took Steve Job’s death as an opportunity to highlight this, but nobody likes to think of their iPad as the reason why people live in polluted areas and throw themselves from the tops of buildings.
technology can clean polluted areas. technology also can be misused, just like anything else.
compared to how we live now, our lives would seem unbearable without technology.
What are they smoking?
One of the greatest “technologies” of all time is the flushable toilet. Everything else is a rounding error on that invention as far as progress is concerned.
Whoever invents the self-cleaning toilet or bathroom (and they’re not that far off - I’m betting on the Japanese) has the ultimate money-maker on their hands.
Facebook, we never knew ya!
Anyone that rants about technology simply doesn’t understand how important extraordinarily small inventions are. Like the paper clip, or the zipper.
Seriously, people? Get some reading done, OK?
When a job is automated, the wages that would have been paid to the worker now flow directly to the owner. Seeing as the objective of a business is to maximize profits, there is no incentive to share the wealth among those who are not the owners. The end result is the 1%/99% split that is happening now.
When a job is automated, the wages that would have been paid to the worker now flow directly to the owner.
and no matter what he does with his profit, it’s good for the economy.
yes, you can say that automation ends jobs, but another way to look at it, is that automation frees up labor to do other, more productive things. automation allows all of us to live better.
Seeing as the objective of a business is to maximize profits, there is no incentive to share the wealth among those who are not the owners.
“sharing the wealth” sounds nice, but ’sharing’ wealth destroys it, in the sense that it has to be accumulated again, to be able to do big things with it, like building factories etc.. and building factories, and investing or saving wealth creates more jobs.
The end result is the 1%/99% split that is happening now.
the 1%/99% thing, is a made up red herring. first, envy isn’t a very flattering demeanor. second, the wealthier a society becomes, the larger the gap will be. but as long as the poorest keep getting wealthier, (as they would with free market capitalism) why complain? are you willing to make the rich poorer, even if such actions hurt the poor more than the rich? would you be satisfied if the rich made a $100,000 less, even if the poor made a $1,000 less as a result?
And never lower prices for the buyer of the widget? Good grief! You guys slept through the computer revolution! Ever hear of the PC? My first computer had 64k memory and cost $4,000 in 1982, I clouded printer, monitor, disk drives.
I’m not going to argue that automation doesn’t make goods cheaper. That is true and everyone who can afford to buy the goods benefits. The problem is about how many can afford to buy goods.
As for the growing wealth divide between rich and poor, it has nothing to do with envy and everything to do with a healthy economy. The middle and lower class are making more money now than they were 20 years ago but after adjusting for inflation, their standard of living is less. The floating boat analogy does not hold water because the tide does not raise all boats equally.
The middle and lower class are making more money now than they were 20 years ago but after adjusting for inflation, their standard of living is less.
true, but that’s because our economy has grown weaker. and automation doesn’t weaken an economy, it strengthens it.
The floating boat analogy does not hold water because the tide does not raise all boats equally.
it doesn’t matter if some boats are on a higher tide than others, as long as all boats are rising. but i agree, not all boats are rising now. all boats only rise in free market capitalism. we don’t have that anymore.
RS article definitely worth reading.
Thanks for posting this link, goonie. A very sobering article; it can happen to any of us, and faster than you can possibly imagine.
If anybody is interested although barring some major crisis I just don’t see how rates could go much lower…
Freddie Mac economist says recession could drive mortgage rates even lower
By Hudson Sangree
hsangree@sacbee.com
Published: Saturday, Jul. 14, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1A
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/14/4630687/freddie-mac-economist-says-recession.html#storylink=cpy
soon you will have to pay them to take your cash.
Falling interest rates, falling housing prices.
Look out.
Actually I think the lower interest rates are helping housing.
It is the saver who cant find and yield and forced to buy facebook garbage.
The yield on the 10 yr is around 1.47%. so who is loaning money to uncle sam for 10 yrs and losing money with inflation?
Plus you have principal risk bigtime. If you plan to get that 1.47% for 10 years then dont worry. But if you need that money earlier and take out it could be worth substantially less. Lots of principal risk.
So who is buying all these treasuries?
Artificially low rates merely delay the inevitable for housing. Delaying the outcome results in an outcome far worse.
Old news my friend. What is new is that we never anticipated the MoneyChangers were willing exacerbate the correction to such extremes. It’s going to be very ugly.
You better have cash. You’re going to need it.
if you want to keep being real negative than that’s your deal.
trying to look on the bright side and lower interest rates are helping the housing market.
I do not want to see a total crash. Things will get better.
“It is the saver who can’t find yield and forced to buy facebook garbage.”
And it is the money manager who has to at least earn his fee in order to keep his clients. Which is tough to do in this low return environment hence he needs to extend the risk part of the risk/reward ratio out a bit.
And just whose money is it that is at risk?
BTW, I know of money managers that are promising their clients ten-plus percent annual returns - and that’s after deducting their fees.
if you want to keep being real negative than that’s your deal.
trying to look on the bright side and lower interest rates are helping the housing market.
I do not want to see a total crash. Things will get better.
You have a strange understanding of “help”.
And oddly, dramatically lower prices of housing is positive and bullish optimism.
You might want to pick yourself up off the floor.
‘if you want to keep being real negative than that’s your deal…trying to look on the bright side…’
You left out Homer Simpsons ‘rocket go now’.
Some things from yesterdays post:
‘The general rationale behind driving down interest rates is that such a policy is beneficial to the Canadian economy. Well, that all depends on how and by whom said benefits are defined…The temptation to go on a borrow-and-spend spree has proven irresistible to consumers who view low interest rates as ‘cheap money.’ One consequence is that the ratio of household debt to disposable income has risen by 40 per cent over the past decade: earlier this year it breeched an astounding 150 per cent, and continues to rise.’
‘Canada’s house prices have doubled since 2002. Low interest rates have fuelled a buying frenzy…and the consequence is that the market is now influenced by speculation rather than the needs of ordinary Canadian families seeking a home, more and more of whom are being excluded from that opportunity’
And: ‘Because households now borrow so much more, we’re actually paying banks almost twice as much in interest payments than we were back when interest rates were at 17 per cent – and it takes much longer to repay the average home loan’
Anything artificial merely distorts. And what was misunderstood years ago is still misunderstood today. That is, an artificially low rate environment for a few months is one thing, but having artificially low rates for years, with no end in sight, is an entirely different level of distortion.
I was going through some papers for the shred truck (I love it when big companies try to be good neighbors and sponsor events like that), and in 2006 I was making over 4% on a money market savings account. No wonder I had increased my withholding at work to make up the taxes I was going to have to pay on interest. Since then, it has ceased to be much of a problem.
“And oddly, dramatically lower prices of housing is positive and bullish optimism.
You might want to pick yourself up off the floor.”
Are you one of those people just sitting back and b@tching about everything and hoping for doom and gloom?
Most of those kind of people missed out on a lot of opportunities to make money.
Dramatically lower housing prices is gloom and doom? Really?
And “most of those kind of people” who bought a house 2003-2012 are underwater and sinking.
And you think that’s optimistic and bullish?
Get a grip.
Yet Rising Credit Card rates….dont you love it?
“Yet rising credit card rates …”
Because … throughout the land there is a shortage of …
… cash.
By the volume of CC offers I get in the mail, it feels like late 90’s.
Yup Combo Trillions of dollars in paper accounting fixes, yet they fight over giving the 99er’s 20 more weeks of unemployment cash.
Happiness is having a diverse portfolio so that you can load up on nearly 0% yielding 52-week T-bills and stare down the Feds. Yes, balanced out with municipals, series I savings bonds, and stock mutual funds and gold. One or two of those asset classes will balance out the losers.
Cash is king, in that sense.
“Cash is king, in that sense.”
It wasn’t all that long ago (before times became “interesting”) that debt was considered by many to be king, that anyone who was loaded up with cash or untapped home equity was considered to be somewhat of a fool.
You too, eh?
I got read that speech in Aug 2008 literally one day before times got, shall we say, interesting?
Just a week later, I noticed that they couldn’t pick up their own tab and my father gallantly did saving them the embarassment.
“Yet Rising Credit Card rates….dont you love it?”
Stop using your credit card.
I always use my credit cards. I pay them off. Going to an ATM is inconvenient. Paying the credit card balance online is convenient. Zero debt and lots o’ cash? You are king.
The Housing price should not be the economic priority,
Many bank in many country prefer lend money to property based asset,
rather than company performance.
The bank do not see how can price of property increase by 60% when salary only increase by 15%.
Bank will likely to lend money to Empty / Unoccupied real estate owner than to busy restaurant suppliers or growing movie producer.
The bank feel property is the safest way to go. And these causes property price to soars, and when economy slows, the bank get more nervous lending to non property based asset. Causing property prices increased astronomically high even though ordinary median income earner can not afford the housing market.
Once the bank lend too much to property sector, some property developers can not find cash flow to pay the interest, and the bank take over, the bank will reduce the interest rate to prevent their asset holding from falling in value.
Home buyers are burden with heavy debt, 40-50% of their income need to pay debt.
Bank, Central Bank, Big Corporation issue bonds, print money to improve market liquidity and channels most of it to property.
The property market become artificially high, and keep on rising despite no one can afford to buy. It will continue to rise until one day depositor, investor and everyone want cash out from the bank, then the bank need to sell the property at price market can afford, and that is 50% or 70% drop, which is the market value.
But then it was the worst nightmare in the economy comes in, Bank will increase interest rate, causing other sector on the economy to suffer, slash worker, to pay higher interest on their loan. And bank have to sell more property at lower price as interest rate increases, and economy slows down. Then you find property price drop by 70% and no one interested. It will settle down at price so low that developers can not produce more new houses with decent profit. Then there will be shortages in the property, and price stabilizes. And bank start pouring money again to developers when shortages caused housing price increase and a new cycle begin which will continue till the next crisis. The price will not come up and stay as the market think it should be, because the bank prefer to distort property prices, and government keep quiet as they got more tax when housing price shoot up.
Someone posted earlier in the week about NYC, and polly suggested I post my views on it so here goes.
Let’s start with the facts. There is absolutely no question that rents have gone up 10% this year (roughly - some more, some less.)
However, I remain convinced that the market is weak, and poised for a collapse.
Let’s start anecdotally. Right before the rent season started, they fired the super in my building and found a cheaper one. He was super efficient so this makes no sense. Then they raised the rents.
At the end of June, seven units got vacated. All of these were families with kids. What this is saying is that 10% raise put them in a budget crisis to the point that they moved.
The vacancies have not been filled as of yet.
I know this is anecdotal of just one landlord but it seems to me that this is a scramble of cash.
Also, the credit market for buying is incredibly tight. Very few banks are loaning out jumbo’s and they will go over your finances with a toothcomb.
So there seems to the equivalent of a “short squeeze” in the rental market. Again, this is not a sign of strength.
Also, the layoffs on Wall St. keep coming. Most are permanent as in these people will never work there again EVER. Whatever the beliefs on this blog, there is regulation coming down and the era of large leveraged profits is gone forever.
The global macroeconomic situation is also deteriorating. There is no doubt that the US is gonna go into a double-dip.
Does this seem like the right backdrop to be buying?
Thanks, FPSS. I was interested in your take on it. I seem to be stuck in DC and I can live with that, but my brother and sister-in-law and their kids are in NYC and given their current school situation, they are staying put. They don’t have to rent, but the situation in New York impacts them and I’m always interested in your perspective.
I know one couple (whose wine I freely partake of) have just purchased for $1.1M.
I think they are doing financially unoptimal stuff but they are buying into a “lifestyle”. Is it “disastrous” or “unoptimal”. Hard to say.
It helps them that they are in one of the best public school districts and their eldest child goes there. So I could see why someone would be willing to “guarantee” that outcome instead of paying for private education.
However, I still think it’s boneheaded. They could just rent. They’re gonna pay almost double their rent for the dubious pleasure of owning.
But what do I know? I’m just a renter who can run a speadsheet.
My sister-in-law’s father was a specialist doctor who was very generous to his youngest child and only daughter. And I’m pretty sure he bought it for her around the bottom of the last RE trough in NY. Plus their oldest just got into one of the citywide G&T schools. They aren’t going anywhere.
Well, if he bought it for her, what’s the big deal?
Surely all they have to do is pay the co-op fees and property taxes.
And if they can’t pay that, what are they even doing there?
Unless they pulled out “equity” in which case they are the classic debt-hobo’s. What can I say?
It isn’t a big deal. But with childcare expenses and nursery school fees on top of co-op fees, it isn’t a piece of cake either. It will get easier once the munchkin is in school full time. They have a few more years where they feel seriously constrained. The G&T school is a nice bonus, but the kids were going to be in public school after preschool no matter what.
And, no, no equity was pulled out at all. She redid the kitchen right before they met, but she did it by having a roommate and saving up for it from the roommate money. Totally responsible, but kids are expensive, no matter how responsible you are.
Double income, no mortgage or rent.
Substitute with childcare and day-care. Temporarily.
Did they save for that ahead of time? Or just “hope” that the little bundle of joy came attached with gold bars.
My heart bleeds for them. I’ll hire a violinist from Juilliard to play them a sad tune!
They got pregnant right after the wedding. Age required they not spend a lot of extra time saving up. My brother works for his commuting costs and the child care. It is the right decision. You don’t give up a tenured position to stay home with the kids and end up with no job at the end of the process. She makes more than he does. Also, she stayed home for a year with each kid, and their savings suffered, but it was the right decision for the kids. As I said before, kids are expensive. Kids in New York City are very expensive when you are trying to keep up to middle class standards.
Kids and NYC don’t mix unless you got a lot of dough. That’s the bottom line.
They got dealt an excellent card. Paid for apartment in NYC, and access to excellent public schools. (Some of the best even paid for by other people!)
So short of a lot of whining, the world’s tiniest violin is playing a dirge for them.
Do they know how to cook? Do they cook each day or just rely on takeout? Is the academic pulling his weight?
Short of specifics, given the absurdly handsome cards that they were dealt, I am underwhelmed. I only hear whining.
Just how common is this occurrence I’ve been running into quite a lot? By that I mean people having houses bought or given to them by parents, grandparents etc.
I’ve learned of three in my circle of friends within the last few months. They are all solidly middle class, but have homes way out of their price ranges. One of them even has the grandparents paying for the kids schooling at the most exclusive private school in town.
My wife and I are always grousing about how impossible it would be to save 20 percent for a downpayment and then keep learning of these people that have everything just given to them. We can’t compete.
We can’t compete.
Which is all according to plan. Not your plan, of course. But your plan doesn’t count.
Where is the whining, honey? I said I was interested in your perspective on what is going on in NY rents and prices because I had family there and they were staying. Where is that a complaint about anything? Real estate values will impact them because other people in the building bought and much more recently. It could be an issue if a lot of people in the building end up underwater. Probably not a tragedy, but it could influence their lives. For example, the obnoxious jerks downstairs might not be able to sell if prices go down too much too quickly. They would dearly love for the a–holes to be able to move. It could impact their lives if people get so desperate for the good school that the school is forced to stop sibling preferences, which is a horrible system but one that currently works to their benefit since their older child got in.
Is money tight for them? Yup. Why? Because they are prioritizing their kids for a few years. Lots of people do that. Ask Muggy.
And, yes, they cook. The favor at their wedding was a collection of the recipes they cooked for each other while dating. I don’ think they cook every day, but they certainly do most days.
Now whining? Whining would be if they were moaning to me about not being able to take fancy vacations. They don’t. Never have. No whining involved. I do wish she would stop lecturing me about buying a new car. I don’t want one. Can’t seem to get that across.
I find a Manhattan talking about cars positively weird.
Most here don’t even have driver’s licences!
You could see that here in LIC in 2009…owning $3700 renting $2200 Hunters point, L Haus made no secret of this on their website, yet people still bought them.
————
They’re gonna pay almost double their rent for the dubious pleasure of owning.
Hmm I think you are so right. I expect a big drop in housing prices next year despite this year’s somewhat (dead cat) bounce.
People were talking about the election the other day and predictions and preceptions. I still pick Romney by a landslide. I prefer him. Lesser of two evils. But I go by the ecomomy. I did not want Obama but knew he would win partly because of the cycle and seasons of politics. I think his support this time is very shallow. Here in Arlington, suburban Boston, vitually no Obama or Elizabeth Warren signs or bumper stickers. Could be too early. But even more ominous for Obama. I have noticed that the bumper stickers from the last election have dissappeared. People are taking them off their cars rather than leaving them. 15% real unemployement not a game winner.
“Lesser of two evils.”
Unfortunately, we always end up with the evil of two lessers.
(I know, I know - I always drag that old joke out every election but its that time again)
Thanks, Puss.
The only activity I’m seeing in the Greater Grapevine region is in the cheerleading press, and nothing at all has sold here in my little burg for 17 months. (At height of the bubble 4-5 properties per month were changing hands.) So many migrants have left the state that the highways around here are all-but deserted.
Have no hard figures, but I imagine the rental market in the valley ’round Bakersfield is pretty stagnant with many folks either moving on or hunkering in. What I’m seeing here in the semi-underground is four or five non-related people moving into one rental where previously only one or two lived there.
Waiting for the inevitable influx from the New Dust Bowl developing in TX and OK. Only this time all the field work (real and metaphoric) has been mechanized….
Up valley, the 70’s house I’ve been tracking in Tahoe finally sold after three years off and on the market for 30% below its 2004 purchase price. Whomever bought it is going to have 40 years of ski-country maintenance catch-up on their hands.
Will they really go to California? It is very easy to find out that there isn’t any work to go to these days.
Who needs work if there are good social programs? If you are going to be poor and unemployed, why not while away the hours in a nice place?
Mild climate can make homelessness a ittle easier.
I was doing a little figuring in Quicken yesterday, and realized something that somewhat shocked me (even given my screenname). I’ve mentioned it before, taxes are, by far, my biggest yearly expense. However, the thing that I’d never done before was calculate all my taxes (income, real estate, sales, tolls, and “added taxes” on things like flights and rental cars) against my income. My total taxes paid last year were almost exactly 50% of our income. I guess that’s not all that shocking given that in the 33% bracket, anything you buy that’s taxable is immediately 40% tax. Add in things that are “pure tax” (RE taxes being the big one, but last year I had a huge “transfer tax” payment as well) and I suppose I should have realized that only about 50% of my salary is actually available for my “personal” use.
I work 4 hours a day for me, and the rest of the day for the government. I’m going to have to try not to think of it that way, but, just out of curiousity, has anyone else ever done this kind of calculation? Do you think that 50% total tax burden is a “reasonable” amount? Are you surprised that it can get that high in the “upper-middle” income brackets (I had no income in the top bracket last year).
Lucky you. If you have to pay all those taxes they you must be earning some big bucks.
There is a way for you to not pay any taxes at all but I don’t think you would want to go there.
Either you make a lot of money, or you’re lying (or both?)
I do very well, and I pay a lot less than that. That includes NYC tax because I live in Manhattan.
That’s total tax one more time not marginal tax. The marginal tax does approach your mythical 50% but it’s still lower than that.
I call BS.
The Real-World Middle Class Tax Rate: 75%
http://www.oftwominds.com/blogjuly12/real-world-tax-rate7-12.html
Fail. He counts the employer share of FICA as a tax on his gross income even though it doesn’t come out of his paycheck. If he is going to include the employer share, then he has to tack it onto his gross income.
He looks at marginal tax rate on income (33%), not actual tax paid. If you are single and make 100K, you pay 10% on the first $8500 of taxable income. Based on the tax table and his standard deduction calculation of $9600, you would pay $18,936 in income taxes. So the effective income tax rate is really 19%.
He includes health insurance as an effectve tax and calculates it as 15%. If you are young and single, you can get a catastrophic insurance policy for much less. When I looked at it for my 24 year old (as part of the decision as to whether to carry him on my insurance), I could find one for $95 per month.
Just on those issues, he overstates the taxes by 14% + 7.5% + 15%, which brings the effective tax rate down to 42%. And that doesn’t account for the state and property taxes, which are local and variable. For property taxes, it is not just dependent on rates, but also on property value.
I’m not in the top tax bracket. But assume the 33% bracket, spending a dollar on anything that has sales tax, you’re already at the 40% market. If that dollar is spent on something “travel related” (as many of my dollars are), there’s big time extra taxes on that which can easily take you above 50%. That’s just the marginal tax on a dollar earned and spent, it doesn’t take into account any of the “fixed” taxes (the big one being RE tax, but last year I had a big transfer tax payment as well).
Forget about my situation for a second, do you think it’s “reasonable” that someone in this country earning 1M/yr (which is FAR more than I earn) pays 500K in taxes? Do you think that’s a “fair” number, too high or too low?
Seems pretty fair to me. You aren’t talking about paying 50% for fire and police protection. You are paying for all the services you receive from every level of government everywhere. Travel taxes are high because tourists don’t vote. Are you including taxes you paid on your honeymoon and the sales taxes you paid on that monster wedding you had because your girlfriend needed you to pay 10’s of thousands of bucks on a party? Transfer tax, so that is for the purchase of a half a million dollar house?
I’m surprised the amount is so low.
Firstly, someone making $1M in Manhattan would pay about $400K in taxes total not $500K (roughly speaking - I’m not gonna pull out the tax tables!)
So you are wrong to begin with.
(And that’s Manhattan not the rest of the country so you need to add that in too.)
Secondly, very few people make that kinda income as “working income”. At that level, there’s a lot more capital gains and tax-free dividends so the number $1M is dubious to begin with.
Lastly, since you don’t make this income, why are you so generously concerned about the welfare of the rich? Don’t you have better things to be worrying about?
Like the housing market, for example?
I think he is adding in all the sales taxes he paid in addition to the income taxes. Plus real estate taxes, real estate transfer taxes and travel taxes. Then he added in tolls and airport fees and whatever.
So federal income taxes, state income taxes if any, local taxes other than property, property taxes, sales taxes (paid for a huge wedding last year), travel taxes and fees, transfer taxes on buying a big house, tolls on toll roads, gas taxes, and so on and so on and so on.
As I said, I’m surprised it is only 50%. And I think I backed out that his income was a minimum of $350K, possibly a lot more depending on how much was tax free interest and/or low tax dividends and cap gains. Plus with the wedding, he may have spent more than his after tax income last year upping the sales taxes.
So to borrow a classic ploy, why doesn’t he spend less and not take vacations?
He’ll save on taxes.
Let him eat moldy cake!
In the 50’s high earners were taxed at 70% of a big portion of their income . What evolved was more and more tax breaks and than the lowering of the tax rates .
I think one of the biggest complaints about taxes these days is how the money is spent . Nobody thinks that the lobby system Politicial machine is looking out for the real health of
the Majority Population ,or the health of American economy in terms of what benefits the most people in the Grand Bee Hive .
The natural thought people have is ,”How are these taxes benefiting me in the scheme of things ,how did the Banker /investment house bailouts really benefit me ?”
People ask ,”How are all these Wars and the Military machine really benefiting me in the final analysis ?”
One could say for decades that tax money was invested in America from 1945 to 1970 maybe . Than apparently it became a game of the special interest lobbying system of Politics on who would benefit and who wouldn’t ,without the concern of the entirety of the systems ,or whats good for America as a whole .Globalism emerged and this no doubt has eroded away at the tax base of America . Did anybody think about how outsourcing and outmanufacturing would take tax dollars and jobs outside this Country ? Did anybody think about how “Free Trade ” would end up reducing commerce to the lowest wage Nations becoming the producers and the monopoly ,such as China ?
In a desperate attempt to fund by raising taxes ,right at a time when less jobs are available ,it will take more buying power out of the hands of the consumers ,along with inflation
doing its damage .But health care will go up in price in spite of it breaking the backs of the average Americans.
Do the Politicians care if they set the stage for us going off the cliff ,they only know how to be loyal to their lobbyist .
Just look at what is happening in Greece today and it might be the blueprint of what is to come in the United States .
One could say for decades that tax money was invested in America from 1945 to 1970 maybe.
Vietnam?
It’s one of the factors that made the US go off the gold standard and effectively “default”.
The US has been overspending for a very long time.
Forget about my situation for a second, do you think it’s “reasonable” that someone in this country earning 1M/yr (which is FAR more than I earn) pays 500K in taxes? Do you think that’s a “fair” number, too high or too low?
If someone earning $50,000 per year has to pay $25,000 in taxes, then I don’t see anything unreasonable with that scenario.
I am single, no kids and in the 28% bracket and trust me, I pay a lot of taxes. I am trying to save for my retirement and between wall street skimming off my 401K and taxes, I am having a hard time getting ahead of inflation.
Your figures seem right.
I pay:
Car rental taxes
Sales taxes
Capital gains taxes (short term and long term)
Dividend taxes
State income taxes
Federal income taxes
Utility taxes (5% of my cable fee is FCC fee and license fee, ten percent of my electric bill is tax)
tSA fee on airline tickets
I did not check my Verizon cell phone service taxes.
A porton of my rent goes to property taxes
“green” taxes at auto service centers for disposing of my old tires and oil.
Polly loves all these taxes.
I don’t. Private enterprise is much more efficient than government. Always. Abolish taxes.
Yeah, have a couple of glasses of wine before you look at the taxes added to your phone bill. Its simply astounding.
It isn’t clear to me on the phone bill what is a direct tax to me vs. what the phone company calls a fee for “their” tax. I don’t think we should count pass throughs as our personal tax.
vs. what the phone company calls a fee for “their” tax.
Some of what they tack on and call “fees” is not even for “their tax”—it’s just a revenue stream for them. Somewhere along the line, they discovered that if they make it look like a tax based on the location that they list it on the bill, then people don’t consider it in their rate-comparisons.
And now that our health insurance is a tax we can add that into the total as well….
Oh yeah, the people younger than me should consider social security and medicare as taxes they will never be paid back. I may get money that I put in and maybe not. I don’t intend to draw from social security until 70.
Add 10%.
So I think the blogger above who said 75% is closer to the right percentage. Our economy would have a high GDP, perhaps 8% if we privatize it. We have more a planned economy than a capitalist economy.
My federal and state (Mass) income tax is about 35% including social “security.” And I figure indirect taxes all along the the value chain add about 30% to cost of everything I buy. I save half my post tax income. Live very modestly off the other half so figure my real tax rate approaches 45%.
If you are counting the employer’s half of SS and Medicare, you are already counting more than most people do. If you do that, you at least need to add that employer’s share into your salary before you do the division and specify that you are including it when no ordinary person looking at a pay stub does.
Typcially I half the employer share of SS figuring the employee and employer would spilt the savings. So add ~3.5% to my above figure.
“If you are counting the employer’s half of SS and Medicare, you are already counting more than most people do. If you do that, you at least need to add that employer’s share into your salary before you do the division and specify that you are including it when no ordinary person looking at a pay stub does.”
This is one of the great propaganda scams the govt pulls. SS tax is 12.4%, employees pays 6.2, employers pay 6.2. But the great unwashed masses think the employer 6.2 is “free”. They don’t realize that the employee still pays it indirectly since the 6.2% paid by the employer would otherwise be paid in the form of wages, other benefits, etc. Same with the 2.9% Medicare tax paid 1.45/1.45 between employer/employee.
Just like any other tax by companies, it is never actually paid by companies but simply passed on to consumers/employees.
Just like any other tax by companies, it is never actually paid by companies but simply passed on to consumers/employees.
I don’t disagree with this point of view, but can’t I equally well argue that I, as an employee, do not actually pay my own taxes, but rather I pass them along to my employer? After all, they could pay me a lot less if there weren’t so many taxes taken out of my paycheck before it hits my bank account.
(Overtaxed at 50%)
Oh yes, I take great pleasure in telling people in the working class that about 40% of their incomes are taken by all taxes and fees paid yearly to all levels of their government. At the federal level alone, they pay SS, income and Medicare taxes. Our state level tax is for income and sales. Our local taxes also hit income, sales and property. And there are all those little taxes paid on your utilities. I keep telling people that it’s the easiest thing in the world, once you list ‘em all, and then total ‘em up. A spreadsheet is great for this. And you’re going to find at least 40% of “your” income (incl. capital gains) vanishes into the great maw of bloated, two-party, fiscally liberal government. Then I laugh and ask why they aren’t voting Libertarian. Great fun (for me, at least).
At these tax levels, if we were real men, we’d have had a second revolution by now. But due to that good ol’ opiate of the masses….
+1, and why I have been a libertarian since I was 20, that was 1979.
You admit to working for the government about half time (and presumably you would be earning somewhere around half your income from the government) and then you complain about high taxes based on dubious mathematics? Go cry elsewhere.
Dubious because you are mistaking marginal tax rates with overall taxation. I am also somewhere in the same bracket but pay only around 20% federal tax - no deductions etc.
Here is why your diatribe is wrong:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard63.html
I wanted to share a story about my experience with the true state of the Phoenix housing market. Listening to the MSM would have one believe that it’s all hunky dory out here, but that’s not the case. Has it improved from last year? Yes. But we also saw the same “improvement” in 2010 only to hit new lows in 2011. Is it really different this time?
I’ve been renting a seasonal residence in the east valley. The landlord is an out-of-state speculator, who purchased (cash), went down to Home Depot, bought the cheapest everything he could, and did a halfway decent renovation of the house, about $15k worth of materials and labor, and marked up the price $50k and put it back on the market. He was optimistic it would sell quickly.
Fast forward one year, after sitting on the market with well over 100 showings and three offers that fell through at the last minute, frustrated, he pulled it off the market and is going to wait it out until the market is even better next year.
This is but one story - but I gather it is not uncommon. In the area, listings are dropping because investors have snatched up many properties, driving the median asking price up 35% in the past year, but note that it does NOT mean that houses have appreciated 35% in the past year. The papers would lead one to believe that, but just because the mix of homes have changed and the numbers are skewed away from the 30k condos that were common last year. Also, people have taken their homes off the market, thinking that it will be even better next year. My personal belief is that in the next couple of months, some of the more recent investors will get cold feet and decide to sell which will precipitate the next leg down and alleviate the so-called inventory shortage.
Synopsis - Investors buying properties do not create a stable market.
Why is this false notion about Fee-Nix even taken seriously? The same thing played out in LV in 09-10 and it has since crashed once again.
The risk is high. Prices are inflated and falling, rates are sinking.
Plus, it’s Fee-Nix fer heavensake.
I picked a great weekend to return home to Phoenix and avoided three weekends of searing heat. Monsoon is going on here in Phoenix. My air conditioner is working well. I was out early this morning for my 4100 yard swim. Will go out again for my vegetarian lunch at Whole Foods Market. But then stay in through the evening.
Will be in Phoenix for five days in August and two days in September. Then be back more frequent weekends after that through next May.
It is like that in central oregon too. So much anectotal evidence is starting to sound like data. I think when the middle of the market needs to sell en masse it will push the bottom down. However…
Low end gets multiple offers same daiy it lists, but the middle market is not like that. Here is a tale of two foreclosures both purchased in 2007.
A 270k home was just resold for 162k(22k over list in two days), for a loss in value of $108k. But it listed for 140 and sold for 162k.
Wife’s condo was purchased for 392k and it resold after foreclosure at 177k(30k less than it listed for after 6 months). Total loss in value over $215k. It was also pulled off the market at least once as it attracted no offers at 200k.
So the spread between these properties in 2007 was $122k. Now the spread between these two in 2012 is $15k. Personally I would prefer to buy a luxury unit with more square footage built in 2007, than a older beat up house without central heating or AC and also a messed up septic drainfield, but investors don’t care so much as they both would rent out for around $1100 per month, incidentally 10% more than last year.
Mike, who are the three best employers in Bend, OR., and what is the average salary for someone with a 4-yr degree and 5-yrs of experience?
I got down the farmers’ market at daybreak.
There was only a tiny amount of corn picked fresh this morning but I bought it all. The hippie ol’ lady was like, “You’re buying it all. What about other people?” and I was like, “What do I care? I’m paying for it, right?”
Some awesome fresh onions, basil, and a delicious corn soup was made. Chilling in the fridge now.
I know some of you have regular access to amazing corn but it’s really a pleasure for us urban types.
Oh, and on that story above, if there’s anybody I haven’t offended, I apologize.
We used to grow organic sweet corn. It was a great loss leader, but a royal pain as it was heavy and tomatoes/strawberries made more sense and took up less room in the truck. The worms got to most ears and the buyers picked thru it. Worms everywhere, but who wants to pay to put a drop of oil on each ear to prevent damage on a crop that loses money anyway? But as much as I hated selling it, eating it was great!
Also, if you don’t want to ingest too many heavy metals, avoid organic celery. So much organic copper sulfate needs to be sprayed as fungicide that the tips turn blue. Sticking to the scale of gardeners rather than the “whole wallet”, corporate, organic truck farmers(they come to the market as well for the retail bucks) seems prudent. Having worked for both types, organic and monoculture are two terms that don’t combine well.
But if you wanted to farm for whole foods, you gotta step up to their scale, and also know they will dump you if the farmer up the way undercuts you by a buck. Which is how I convinced a truck farmer to let me take his goods to farmers market in the 90s. The big boys were taking over wholesale, making the pains of retail worth it. The hippy dippy garden farmer I had worked for out of college went under due to farming for lofty principles; too bad as our berries were off the hook!
I bought corn, spring peas, tomatoes, sage, basil.
There’s a local fisherman so I bought a dozen clams too. He’s great. He knows me really well so he always tells me what’s really good. Never been wrong ever!
My nickname at the market is “tomato man” because I’m really crazy about excellent tomatoes. I’ve been going there for 10+ years. They all know me.
Oh, and there’s a raspberry granita in the freezer!
Urban haters, eat sh!t and die. LOL.
my ex-boss got into heirlooms after I left. Grows them in ghetto greenhouse tunnels so he gets them early and keeps em coming to December or a freeze. Of course Santa Barbara has great weather. And I do miss the peas, or having 100 types of veggies to cook from. Don’t miss the boxes or bagging.
We had some freaks that would spend hundreds every week. People who wear gas masks out in public kind of freaks. Of course we did not refer to them that way when selling them market up food. They were our bread and butter.
We ate that stuff up for free! Yay us!
“There was only a tiny amount of corn picked fresh this morning but I bought it all.”
You dick.
Hey, I went drinking with my buds and I was pretty hungover but I still got to the market at the crack of dawn to get the corn.
Apparently, you can have it all without even being 1%.
Are they open before it gets light? Seeing as you were buying at the crack of dawn?
We used to pick berries and corn for same day sale; but we wouldn’t get them delivered to the market until around 8. luckily the market opened at 8:30. But I know NY is different.
That said, if it was picked even the day before how could a foodie like you be satisfied??
Oh yeah you are urban chic so; therefore you have to settle for less than the freshest ingredients.
I’m not urban chic. I want good food, and I cook daily from scratch.
I make my own broths, I can my tomatoes at the end of summer. I have friend’s help my haul my tomatoes at the end of summer so they can all get my homemade tomato past.
I also write a serious food blog (which some regulars here know about.)
So you know nothing about me.
And they get there at about 7:00am. I’ve been there before at 6:45 and it was awesome. Do you know how great it is to see Manhattan totally deserted?
Didn’t have my camera but I wish I had.
As a self-proclaimed, “salt-of-the-earth” type, I bet you don’t even know what to do with pea pods (an example from today!)
I challenge you. Tell me what you do with them besides feed cattle!
You people are full of yourself without any knowledge to back up the bluster.
what to do with pea pods
I use them in my stir frys.
That’s for the tender ones.
What do you do with the tough fibrous ones?
I really wanna see this “oh-your’e-so-urban” type actually answer a few tough cooking questions!
I ain’t know nuthing bout stringy pea pods cuz we just ate them raw. Shell and all. Of course I ain’t talking English, or snow, rather sugar snap peas.
Yeah I heard about your blog but you still did not get fresh pricked corn. Sorry
I’m talking shell peas. You’re evading as might be obvious.
You haven’t a clue.
All these salt-of-the-earth, mono-lingual types are all the same. Push through the extent of their ignorance and they collapse faster than a classical souflée;.
The other option is to cloak it in patriotic dogsh!te. There’s nothing wrong with a steak for me, etc.
No clue whatsoever. “All hat, no cattle,” as they say!
Isn’t it spelled “soufflé”? Just how mult-lingual are you?
It was a typo. Anger is not conducive to reason.
And I speak French just fine.
I never dodged/ claimed knowing what to do with the shell of peas (English); just the sugar snaps. We tried English a few times but we could bring 200 lbs of snaps at $5/lb; a single box of English just took up room in the truck that could be better utilized for profit.
The people, the great unwashed, as it were, just were not interested in anything but Sugar Snap Peas. I told you if they were English peas I would not know what to do with the shells. I am alright as a cook but know little of haute cuisine. But arguing with the narcissist is in vain. The only time you were ever wrong must have been the time you thought you were wrong. So I lose, but you still get corn quickly turning to starch.
I was simply telling you if you bought corn early A.M., it was most likely picked yesterday. Starch starts to form as soon as you pick it; you are settling based upon availability due to your unfortunate location for getting boutique produce year round. What do you do for fresh produce in the winter?
I have grown radish; honking 3 foot Daikons, parsnips, garlic, turnips, french breakfast radishs, and round red ones. Mandarins to mulberries. Mixed greens and baby spinach. Orange and red and striped beets, Nantes carrots Purple kohlradi, dandelion greens, celeriac radiccio,Dinosour(black) kale, pimiento pepper, pickles, english, and regular cukes, summer and winter squash. Eggplant, japanese eggplant, basil, cilantro. And scores of others A lot of the specialty items I really never wanted to mess with as I lived within a cornocopia for a decade. And we could trade with other farmes to get what we wanted to eat that was not grown in the field such as honey, eggs, etc. I may not know food but I know about growing it organically.
Mostly I liked to eat raw foods and would compost English peas shells; which is another legimate use for them. If I still ran a farmer’s market booth I would ask you for a recipe, but I don’t, so I wont. And my wife cooks now that I have taught her the basics.
I always giggled when we sent strawberries clear across the country so NY could have “fresh” organic strawberries. Sometimes $36 per case wholesale, and the berries were harder and blander to withstand shipping. For the markets we had a different variety that were great but we could not ship. Again the urban folks need to settle for high priced ripoff organics in your off season.
Mono lingual??
Me speakee spanish and french
Take your ball and go home now.
Oh yeah
You have yet to even scratch the surface regarding the depths of my ignorance.
Keep dishing it out and making assumptions about others while telling others they know nothing of you somehow you know everything about them. I am surprised that some random from the web could make you angry. Dish out all you want but maybe learn to take it too; it’s good for you!
As a foodie, do you know the only whole grain that provides a perfect protein? there is a reason rice and beans are served together as neither of those are perfect proteins and thusly combined
Hypocrisy, thy name is Truth?
Comment by alpha-sloth
2012-07-13 14:22:16
Why does oxide get the raz for buying, while Jethro gets a house-warming party?
What’s the diff?
Comment by Realtors Are Swindlers®
2012-07-13 23:36:56
Seriously? You haven’t figured that out yet?
I’ll tell you what….. show me a single post where Jethro rationalized paying inflated prices for a depreciating asset.
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT [aka Jethro]
2012-07-12 16:05:49
Being underwater doesn`t scare or bother me one bit. I lived and worked through it before when I bought my first place. My goal is not to make money on this house, my goal is to pay it off in the next 13 years. I have a lot more confidence in my ability to do that than I have in our elected officials, Fed chiefs, banksters and Deadbeats to do the right thing and let it go.
He didn’t go about justifying his own decision publicly.
That’s a very female thing to do. First make a decision, and find all the evidence to support it while ignoring all the evidence that is accumulating. (There are exceptions like ahansen, polly, or even my sister but yes! I stand by statement that this is a very female thing to do.)
For example, foreclosure inventory, student loans, etc.
I find “sfrenter” equally annoying. She hasn’t a clue.
My sister lives in SF, and yes, money is flowing fast and furious but a stable market that does not make. It’s just “buy now or get priced out forever” in a more modern guise.
I find “sfrenter” equally annoying. She hasn’t a clue.
A clue about what? If you’re going to be dismissive, at least elaborate a little, otherwise it’s just cheap noise.
Honestly I’ve been on this blog all these years simply because I have been trying to find a stable place to live.
The only reason we started looking to buy is because finally PITI would be less than our current rent. (hey! I learned that here on HBB!!). And our landlord drives us nuts. We really are just what we seem to be: a family of 4 that needs a long-term place to live.
Renting has become more and more expensive. I know we pay more to live in SF, and also know that I do not want to spend more than 25% of our income on housing. We have considered relocating, but with 20+ years combined seniority in our teaching jobs, kids in schools we like, and a city we love, doing so as we approach our 50’s in an uncertain economy (whole lotta pink slips in most school districts) seems foolish.
I have noticed that the majority of people who are really insistent on “don’t buy” usually already have stable housing. Or no kids. Renting and saving is awesome if you live in a place where renting is cheap.
We’re hanging on and won’t buy unless PITI is less than our rent. If it takes so long that we see another leg down in the housing market, then that’s great. It probably will.
I find “sfrenter” equally annoying. She hasn’t a clue.
Well my first response didn’t show up, but maybe that’s for the best, ‘cuz faster’s dismissive tone without any explanation is just cheap noise anyways.
The best thing I learned from reading HBB all these years was to wait to buy until PITI was less than renting. Which is exactly why we are looking now.
That, and the fact that we really just need a place to live without a nutty, meddling, aging landlord.
The folks that are most vociferous about “don’t buy now no matter what” tend to be people who have either stable rentals or do not have kids and dogs and a solid community that really matters to them.
As it happens, we may not find a place that fits my criteria (2+ bedroom for less than $2200 month PITI), although I’ll be damned if that wasn’t an option last fall. And the market may well take another leg down (fingers crossed) before we find what we want, which would be great…
…but the idea that anyone who does not want to be a permarenter nor move to Oil City doesn’t have a clue is mighty condescending.
sfrenter
If Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell finds you “annoying” I would consider it a badge of honor. You did not jump into buying, you are being cautious while looking to do what is best for your family and give them stability while very powerful forces fight against you. And you are right, some people shooting their mouths off do not have kids and dogs and a solid community that really matters to them.” I don`t think some people take into consideration that kids do grow up and you may not have 15 years start to finish to wait this thing out.
Now Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell as far as “That’s a very female thing to do.” #1 My statement about being underwater was an answer to a post about buying a “depreciating asset”.
#2 If you post sh#t like…
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2012-07-14 12:21:26
I bought corn, spring peas, tomatoes, sage, basil.
There’s a local fisherman so I bought a dozen clams too. He’s great. He knows me really well so he always tells me what’s really good. Never been wrong ever!
My nickname at the market is “tomato man” because I’m really crazy about excellent tomatoes. I’ve been going there for 10+ years. They all know me.
Oh, and there’s a raspberry granita in the freezer
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2012-07-14 15:59:50
Hey, I went drinking with my buds and I was pretty hungover but I still got to the market at the crack of dawn to get the corn.
And then say….
“That’s a very female thing to do.”
Expect replies like this…
I know we grew up on different planets. When I “went drinking with my buds” I usually woke up with a young lady whose acquaintance I made while I was out. Besides getting pulled back into the sack for another aerobic workout before we parted ways, had I got up at the crack of dawn and went skipping off to the market to get corn, spring peas and basil I am pretty sure these young ladies would have been making a doctors appointment to get an AIDS test. Not to mention trying to explain why I knew a local fisherman so well and why he called me “tomato man”.
“First make a decision, and find all the evidence to support it while ignoring all the evidence that is accumulating”
I would contend that this is a very human thing to do. It is called rationalization and I expect that most of us are guilty of it at one time or another, regardless of gender.
Hey alpha, do you work for NBC? You left something out.
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-07-12 16:05:49
Being underwater doesn`t scare or bother me one bit. I lived and worked through it before when I bought my first place. My goal is not to make money on this house, my goal is to pay it off in the next 13 years. I have a lot more confidence in my ability to do that than I have in our elected officials, Fed chiefs, banksters and Deadbeats to do the right thing and let it go.
Now having said that I would not want to be underwater as far as the last owner of the UNKNOWN Casa. Cause if it goes to 0 I wouldn`t be that far underwater.
——————————————————————————-
But I am getting a good laugh out of this, cause it seems like somebody put some pepper in your vaseline.
WHO PUT THE PEPPER IN THE VASELINE by Barefoot- YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhGFNmrjMDs - 125k - Cached - Similar pages
Dec 28, 2009 … from the “Barefoot & Andy” LP BAREFOOT RECORDS BF-5704 1970s? STEREO .
Went to the Farmers Market this morning. Good news, they now accept, EBT, SNAP and WIC as payment. And they even had a representative from the state there to show you how easy it is to use your EBT/SNAP/WIC cards to purchase items.
You are right. This is excellent news. Thanks for passing it along.
Yeah, it’s excellent news.
The awesome fresh tomatoes were $4/lb. I wonder which EBT people bought those.
Dude, don’t these partisan posts kinda stink? Am I the only one that’s totally irritated and bored by these?
I know of a dude who just bought an AR15 from a guy I know. $200 of the payment was with his SNAP card. They are grocery shopping together this weekend and next. The guy who bought the gun and is paying with SNAP is about 30 years old and lives with his parents. My imagination is not good enough to make this sh#t up.
I’d trade beer or cigerettes for SNAP cards 50 cents on the dollar if I could then use the SNAP card at a farmers market.
But no I shouldn’t be buying losers smokes and beer which is why I never give homeless money just snacks I carry in my car.
But someone will
U.T., you can use your food stamps to purchase a bow and arrow set in Alaska, since hunting there is used for food.
There ain`t much hunting going on in Jupiter Fl.
@BetterRenter
Maybe because if they voted libertarian they could have ended working 60+ hours a week and they would not have any social security because there would not be any. Do not get me wrong. The problem is not the taxes, the problem is what you get for it.
Being libertarian nowadays makes your life harder. Everything is regulated whether you like it or not. The so called invisible hand is a fallacy. It has always been. Why? Because if you do not regulate, some people behave in auto-destructive (race to the bottom) way while others take the opportunity to make money of it.
If you were right, why there would be increase in US immigration to Canada?
The reality we live in is much more complicated than you can predict by being libertarian. Regulation is the correct answer to it. People prefer to reduce the risks and are not rational in their choices. Health insurance, food stamps etc. is the (flawed) way how to help those who are poor. And the rest pays for it. Get over it!
Uhm, excuse me, JohnB. The problem isn’t the taxes? 40% at least in the Midwest, and easily 50% in major urban areas? Like I said, a tax rate of HALF would have had the 1700s men grabbing their muskets. And yet we put up with it, not because we gain ‘benefits’ from having half our incomes stolen each year, but because we’re too afraid of losing what little we have when we revolt.
The government is supposed to be a management layer. Such a layer is supposed to be minimal, so that the people get their work done and their lives lived. Accepting our level of taxation like this is like accepting an OS on your computer that sucks up half the computer’s ability to do work, all on its own.
Libertarians know what works. Government is supposed to enable stable society; not be a vampire upon it. We’ve gotten far, far away from the natural Libertarian state of the design of the Republic, which is why stuff like the housing bubble happened, and why huge government debts happened, and why bailouts and corporate welfare happened. And it’s clearly destroying our culture.
Also, I do not know where this idea comes from that Libertarianism means “no regulation”. It means MINIMAL regulation, and that regulation is 100% enforced. It means that govt is put back into its proper role: A management layer. An enabler, not a consumer.