All I can say is this: I’m glad there’s an HBB. What a rollicking ride it’s been for, oh, the last six years. So happy to have found this party back in the spring of 2006.
Yeah, Linus had faith that the Great Pumpkin would come. I am trying to still believe that sanity will eventually return.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-08-08 08:39:31
“Yeah, Linus had faith that the Great Pumpkin would come.”
Meanwhile, World War I Flying Ace Snoopy, in full uniform, climbs aboard his trusty Sopwith Camel (his doghouse), to engage his old nemesis the Red Baron in battle. After a fierce fire-fight which forces Snoopy to ditch his plane behind enemy lines, he crawls his way across the countryside, briefly showing up at Violet’s Halloween party, and then goes to the pumpkin patch to make mischief. One very cool scene occurs when Linus sees Snoopy’s ominous shadow rising from among the pumpkins, believing it’s the Great Pumpkin finally finding his pumpkin patch “worthy,” and then proceeding to faint. When Sally discovers that it’s only the mischievous Snoopy, she regrets missing “tricks-or-treats” and the Halloween party, and threatens to sue Linus for ruining her fun.
As Sally joins the other kids to make the best of what’s left of Halloween, Linus is still convinced that the Great Pumpkin will show up, and vows that he will put in a good word for the gang–accidentally saying if the Great Pumpkin comes, instead of when. When he realized his great faux pas, he exclaims that he is doomed and that even one mistake can cause the Great Pumpkin to pass him by.
Global stocks continued to rise throughout yesterday and overnight in Asian trading as speculation continues to mount that the European Central Bank and the U.S. Federal Reserve will announce monetary stimulus measures to boost their respective recoveries.
Asian markets saw Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index increase 0.24%, Australia’s S&P/ASX200 gain 0.70%, whilst Japan’s Nikkei 225 Index was up 0.96. The rise for the 3rd consecutive day comes as speculation the central bank of China will cut the reserve requirement for lenders or lower interest rates as the world’s second-largest economy slows. A government report tomorrow may show Chinese consumer prices increased 1.7 percent in July from a year earlier, the least since January 2010. Japan’s 10-year yields increased three basis points to 0.81 percent, the highest since July 5.
A sluggish recovery in the U.S. will likely prompt action from the Fed Reserve there and investors, helped by hints by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, are expecting the Federal Reserve will stimulate the U.S. economy via buying Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities from banks. Unemployment has continued to hover around the 8.2% mark for some time and Fed bond purchases, known as quantitative easing, weaken the dollar and keep interest rates low to aid recovery, a combination that makes stocks an attractive investment. The US 30 index closed 0.39% higher yesterday whilst the USD made small gains against most major currencies as a sell off of commodities helped the USD’s ascent. The largest swing overnight for the greenback was against the commodity linked AUD; up 0.16%.
Increasing expectations that the ECB will implement a debt buying scheme for distressed nations such as Spain, Greece and possibly Italy continued to fuel a risk-on trading sentiment that sparked strong demand for stocks. The FTSE closed 0.56% higher, whilst Germany’s DAX finished 0.71% higher. The EUR/USD was down 0.10% at time of writing.
…
I feel like the Titanic has sailed and we all know that there a limited number of life rafts. Let’s hope that there is no room for banker’s and those on Wall street.
The $2.6 billion in property value reductions is more than eight times the total from 2011, when the tax office agreed to 164 settlements for a total reduction of $305 million, city records show. In 2010, there were 11 settlements with a total reduction of $43 million. In 2009, there were 35 settlements with $83 million in reductions.
The settlements have raised concerns among some employees in the tax office, where three years ago manager Harriette Walters was sentenced to federal prison for stealing more than $48 million through fraudulent tax returns, the largest embezzlement scheme in city history.
The settlement process largely played out behind closed doors. Tax office officials said supervisors are authorized to significantly adjust property values without approval from higher-ups. The Post reviewed the publicly available settlement records for more than 40 cases and found only brief explanations for even the steepest reductions, which often occurred after staff appraisers provided written accounts supporting higher values.
“They’re just giving it away,” said one veteran city appraiser who for fear of termination declined to be identified. “It’s demoralizing because we are doing our jobs and then they change our assessments. Values are being undercut so much.”
Developers of buildings that settled with the city include longtime builder Douglas Jemal, whose company received a $25 million reduction for 12 properties in Northeast, city records show. The 53 percent reduction, signed in March by George, the chief appraiser, lowered the company’s property tax bill this year by an estimated $460,000.
A $58 million reduction went to Gallery Place, the office and retail building in the heart of Chinatown. The building was built by two of the city’s most influential developers, Herb Miller and John E. “Chip” Akridge III.
Gallery Place is next to Verizon Center, home to the National Basketball Association’s Washington Wizards and the National Hockey League’s Washington Capitals.
George signed off on a settlement that dropped the building’s taxable value to $181 million, a 24 percent reduction. The decision reduced the building’s tax bill by about $1 million. No explanation was listed on the settlement form.
Although it varies based on sector and occupation, the union difference for workers across the board is undeniable.For workers employed in the public sector:
The difference in salary amounts to roughly $165 more a week–approximately $650 more a month–for union vs. non-union.
For workers employed in the private sector:
The salary difference for union vs. non-union amounts to roughly $155 more a week–approximately $615 more a month.
Better for you. Worse for the tax payer. The gravy train is almost off the rails. WI was the first of many. The day unions are finally eradicated will be a great day in this country.
Comment by measton
2012-08-08 08:13:35
Yes a great day where there will be no safety regulation and workers will loose limbs and die with no recourse. There will be a continued downward spiral in wages and a shrinking middle class we will more and more resemble third world countries, power will be entrenched and the only way up will be nepotism or fealty. As big business and the elite will control our gov with no competition we will see entrepreneurs loose their inventions and small businesses get crushed by the large oligopolies and monopolies and the owners will be pushed back down into the lower caste to which he or she belongs. We will see the destruction of Medicare and Social Security and a return to real hunger and of course the rise in crime and social unrest that follows. Taxes actually won’t be lower for most as the elite will continue to tax themselves at less than 10% while everyone else will be paying more via VAT taxes gas taxes user fees and of course the biggest tax of all unemployment.
Comment by Combotechie
2012-08-08 08:19:27
“Better for you.”
That would be me.
“Worse for the tax payer.”
That also would be me.
“The day unions are finally eradicated will be a great day in this country.”
There are reasons unions sprung into existence in the first place. Unfortunatley those reasons are still with us, and as long as these reasons are still with us some workers (but not all workers) will need some sort of a union to serve as an offset.
Comment by 2banana
2012-08-08 09:03:45
There is a HUGE difference in private and public unions.
There is a HUGE difference in “right to work” states and “closed shops” states.
On the relative scale.
Private unions in “right to work” states are good.
Public unions in “closed shops” states are leeches bankrupting all they touch.
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-08-08 09:12:05
I can agree to and favor a right-to-work state with strong employee rights laws.
Closed shop states honestly do not offer choices, even between unions.
Comment by Combotechie
2012-08-08 10:01:22
It’s all about rules and rights. If the employer gets to set all the rules then the worker’s rights (if there are any) are at the whim of the employer.
There has to be a limit put on the employer in the form of a balanced set of rules that will restrain the employer from acting on whatever whim that may happen to overtake him/her at any given time. If these rules are not forced on the employer from without then they need to be forced on him/her from within. Hence the need for unions.
Comment by scdave
2012-08-08 10:36:45
I agree with 2fruit…I do not believe there should be unions in government jobs…
“Yes a great day where there will be no safety regulation and workers will loose limbs and die with no recourse. There will be a continued downward spiral in wages and a shrinking middle class we will more and more resemble third world countries, power will be entrenched and the only way up will be nepotism or fealty.”
But just think how much richer the banksters and other 1%ers would be!
$2.6 BILLION in tax breaks, in just that ONE city is more than the budget of any but the top 5 cities in this nation. Heck, that’s more than the budget of some STATES.
Unions are a flea on that camel’s back. They are ALSO taxpayers.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2012-08-08 09:55:40
PUBLIC union pension liabilities alone are in the TRILLIONS of dollars.
Guess who is on the hook for that? Homeowners.
THAT is one BIG FLEA.
$2.6 BILLION in tax breaks, in just that ONE city is more than the budget of any but the top 5 cities in this nation. Heck, that’s more than the budget of some STATES.
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-08-08 10:11:33
“Unions are a flea on that camel’s back. They are ALSO taxpayers.”
LOL. Union thugs are tax payers, but CEOs aren’t. Got it.
PS: Did you know eeeevil oil companies pay tens of billions in taxes every year?
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-08-08 14:31:22
There are no pension liabilities, only obligations that the government, JUST LIKE PRIVATE BUSINESSES, wants to renege on.
So a contract is contract until it becomes inconvenient, unless you’re a poor person, then you’re a deadbeat, right?
March 29, 2012|By Lisa Mascaro and Christi Parsons
Washington — An attempt to roll back oil company tax breaks was blocked in the Senate, despite a Rose Garden push by President Obama, who said the big five oil companies are doing “just fine” as consumers struggle with painfully high gas prices at the pump.
Republicans led opposition to the measure, but several Democrats from oil-rich states joined the GOP in a filibuster to prevent the legislation from advancing. The vote was 51-47, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold.
The legislation would end more than $2 billion in annual tax subsidies to the so-called big five oil companies — BP, Chevron, Exxon, Shell and Conoco-Phillips.
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2012-08-08 18:57:49
“So a contract is contract until it becomes inconvenient..?”
I usually agree with you, but I would like to say that I didn’t agree to $250k salaries for retired firefighters, nor any of the other nonsense that has taken place. Why am I paying my hard-earned money so those guys can live a life of luxury due to corrupt negotiations which I was never even allowed a voice? I am not anti-union, but these “contracts” are for the birds.
Comment by Rental Watch
2012-08-08 21:34:19
The fundamental problem is that “collective bargaining” when a private union, is private union vs. company. Company executives are absolutely looking out for the bottom line of the company (most have equity in the company), and the private union is looking out for the bottom line of the employees. A good negotiation.
“Collective bargaining” with a public union, is the public union vs. someone who doesn’t have the same interests as a company (or the same rules–like properly accounting for pension liabilities).
So, you end up with very nice pensions. And even when a Dem Governor (J Brown) in a Dem controlled state (CA) puts forth pension reform (as weak as it was), it goes nowhere.
This is nothing new. Local governments always pander to the richest folks in the city. They always get special permits, fee reductions, rezonings, and tax exemptions and reductions.
The people in the government fear the loss of business when they threaten to pull their companies and move out of town. Conversely, how many times have you witnessed your local town council meeting with a “big” company that has “plans” to come to town with 500 new jobs. Will they come here? Yes, under the following conditions: TAX BREAKS FOR 10 years or more. RE-zoning the land.
Elimination of a large portion of fees and permits, etc, etc, etc.
The politicians feel compelled to make concessions so they can say that they were instrumental in bringing>>xyz corp. to town and more good paying jobs. Hooray!
Here in Tampa, I am paying for the SECOND NFL stadium, as the first, built some 20 years before the second was deemed not fancy and new enough to keep the Buccaneers here in town. To do this Public for Private business financing they create a “sports authority” which has similar powers and responsibilities to a Port Authority.
It’s all a scam to provide public funding for very rich owners who promise the City will benefit greatly from having XXXX in their town.
I’ve never seen it. Only an “economist” can come up with a model, whereby giving a milllionaire the exclusive rights to a Stadium paid for by $300 million dollars of public funds is better than building 300 Million-dollar office buildings (or 600 half-million dollars ones) and providing them to “other” business operators.
Which would really have the greater “economic impact”>?? 500 new middle size businesses, rent-free, or one football team??
Corruption is part of the American business model.
“This is nothing new. Local governments always pander to the richest folks in the city.”
I agree 100%.
Salaries for the 10 largest unions’ bosses range from $173,000 for the United Auto Workers’ Bob King to $618,000 for Terence O’Sullivan, the president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka makes about $283,000 per year. Gerald McEntee, the president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), makes $480,000. The AFSCME stands to lose the most from any of the governors’ budget victories, as it’s currently the nation’s powerhouse public sector union, with around 1.5 million members nationwide.
Let’s compare those salaries to CEO pay in America for similarly sized organizations. You know the ones who hand pick their compensation committees and have massive golden parachutes.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Harry Connick Jr Community College Graduate
2012-08-08 09:09:03
I don’t think the unions publicize how many they employ in their organizations. They just publish the membership numbers.
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-08-08 10:10:02
If a private corporation wants to pay its CEO a gazillion dollars a year, what business is it of yours?
On the other hand if the head of a public union pays its head goon $600K, it is my business as a tax payer.
Surely you can see the difference.
Comment by In Colorado
2012-08-08 11:44:08
If a private corporation wants to pay its CEO a gazillion dollars a year, what business is it of yours?
As a shareholder it’s most definitely my business, but as a shareholder I have no say whatsoever in the lotto jackpot sized salaries CEOs get these days. That’s up to the crony filled boards of directors.
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-08-08 12:00:12
“As a shareholder it’s most definitely my business, but as a shareholder I have no say whatsoever in the lotto jackpot sized salaries CEOs get these days. That’s up to the crony filled boards of directors.”
Fine, then sell your shares. Unfortunately as a tax payer I don’t have the option to sell my share of the taxes i have to pay in order for union bosses to earn $600K a year.
Do you really not see the difference?
Comment by turkey lurkey
2012-08-08 14:42:28
Reading comprehension is not your forte, is it?
Did you NOT just read that the PRIVATE business used PUBLIC money to build a $300 MILLION facility that only it has control over?
Your math isn’t so good either. 600K is greater than 300 MILLION?
“If a private corporation wants to pay its CEO a gazillion dollars a year, what business is it of yours?”
If the corporation is a bank, there is a fairly good chance the money was either taken from taxpayers in the form of bailouts or from unwitting customers in the form of some kind of quasi-legal fraud.
You have to give Eddie for stimulating a lot of posts — way more than the recent average until he showed up again.
Never mind the majority of the additional posts were his own…
Comment by Anonymous Coward
2012-08-09 13:27:39
Wow, now Smithers is a troll? Is this forum becoming intolerant of other viewpoints? He’s not extreme, and yet there is a whole mob of you who jump on him every day with personal attacks.
The CEO’s of all major Corporations make millions per year ,and Hank Paulson as a high ranking CEO of a division of Goldmans made more than a half a billion in 5 years at this post as a Wall Street leverage money player .The damage and harm that these high paid thieves did to the entire USA and World was evil .
Mr Smithers ,you want me to get worked up over a high ranking Union man making 283 thousand a year . You must be joking me . The fact that many States can’t meet their budgets can be directly tied to the destruction that was caused by Wall Street and the Banks .You forget who created the shortfalls to begin with and the fake low interest rates and all the bail outs . The fact that they want you to look at public workers and blame them ,or look at people on Social Security and blame them ,or look at some homeless broke person and blame them is all part of take the eye off the Culprits and the ones that benefited from the crime spree that should give the money back ,as well as go to jail .
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 11:35:33
More like the jobs that were outsourced. How much money did states lose to China and India on income tax alone? Enough to pay these pensions?
Comment by Housing Wizard
2012-08-08 12:52:22
Yes ,I forgot to include Corporations as the culprits also in the gutting of the American work force .
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-08-08 13:33:45
“Yes ,I forgot to include Corporations as the culprits also in the gutting of the American work force .”
And who did those American workers, work for in the first place? I’ll give you a few moments to think about it. Time’s up. Answer is corporations.
Those corporations decided to go elsewhere because of the insane regulations and taxation levels adopted in this country. Corporations didn’t gut anything. They simply relocated production to a more hospitable environment. You want those jobs back, easy solution. Make the US a business friendly environment and they’ll come right back.
Comment by Housing Wizard
2012-08-08 19:21:58
The Corporations went to other Countries because they were allowed to without the proper penalty being put on them for taking jobs and the tax base outside of America .
They simply got into the lobby game with crooked Politicans that sold out the USA .
Also proper tariffs were not put on Foreign Countries trade wise ,no doubt more bribes to the Politicians .
You can’t bring back the business when Americans have to compete with 75cent a hour workers in other countries ,The only thing you can do to bring back business is penalize the Corporations in a penalty tax ,or treat them like a foreign corporation ,because their workforce is foreign .
Let them all go to foreign Countries and we can block their products or put a big tariff on them and than we can re-build business here again with smaller entities . let them all become foreign dealers because they aren’t our Corporations anymore . Let them try to sell their shit to
people who make 75 cents a hour .
For Unpaid College Loans, Feds Dock Social Security
More retirees are falling behind on student debt, and Uncle Sam is coming after their benefits.
By ANNAMARIA ANDRIOTIS
It’s no secret that falling behind on student loan payments can squash a borrower’s hopes of building savings, buying a home or even finding work. Now, thousands of retirees are learning that defaulting on student-debt can threaten something that used to be untouchable: their Social Security benefits.
According to government data, compiled by the Treasury Department at the request of SmartMoney.com, the federal government is withholding money from a rapidly growing number of Social Security recipients who have fallen behind on federal student loans. From January through August 6, the government reduced the size of roughly 115,000 retirees’ Social Security checks on those grounds. That’s nearly double the pace of the department’s enforcement in 2011; it’s up from around 60,000 cases in all of 2007 and just 6 cases in 2000.
Roughly 2.2 million student-loan debtors were 60 and older during the first quarter of 2012, and nearly 10% of their loans were 90 days or more past due, up from 6% during the first quarter of 2005, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “It’s really a unique problem we haven’t had to face before, and it’s only going to grow,” says Robert Applebaum, founder of Student Debt Crisis, a nonprofit advocacy group in Staten Island, N.Y.
The government’s withholding power also extends to Social Security disability benefits. Tammy Brown of Redding, Calif. says that the government has been taking $179 out of her Social Security disability check each month for the past five years. Brown, 52, became disabled in 1986 after being involved in a car accident. Unable to work, she fell behind on her student loan payments. She says the Social Security check is now too small to cover her food and medical bills, so she quit taking prescription pain pills. “It’s kind of hard to live on this amount of money,” she says.
Attorneys who specialize in defending debtors have seen a sea change as the government has stepped up its enforcement. For most of the last four years, Joshua Cohen, an attorney in Rocky Hill, Conn., has represented clients in their dealings with banks and collection agencies. It was only in the past year, Cohen says, that he started getting a growing number of calls from retirees. Now, Cohen says, “I’m getting calls from all over the country from people desperate for help.”
Compared to present-day retirees, younger generations are in deeper debt, which means stories of Social Security garnishment could become more commonplace when they enter retirement. Borrowers in their 20s and 30s owe roughly $600 billion, according to the New York Fed. They’re also leaving college with more debt than their predecessors: Sixty-six percent graduated this spring with debt, and their student loans averaging $28,720, up from $9,320 in 1993, according to FinAid.org. “It’s entirely possible that the way student loan debt is growing, this could get worse,” says Rich Williams, higher education advocate at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a nonprofit consumer group.
well, of course it’s stupid for middle-aged people to “go back to school” for some supposed training to make them more hireable.
Unless it’s a short term trade school that teaches A/c maintenance or a six-month course in some specialty wherein there is a shortage of workers.
Unfortunately, the GOVERNMENT offers these loans to people who really shouldn’t be getting them. Yes, that’s right, and OBAMA wanted the government to CONTROL all the lending, because, well, the mean, ugly, nasty, bankers and lenders wouldn’t give loans to people who had little probability of paying them back, so the GOVERNMENT went in to “Fix it”.
All Hail Obama!!
I suspect, he will pass an executive order relinquishing all debts come election time if his polling is a little light, so this should be no problem to the debtors, but probably only to those who are under say 30 years old, i.e. young voters. The SS deductions help create greater “re-distribution”.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 08:47:28
OBAMA wanted the government to CONTROL all the lending, because, well, the mean, ugly, nasty, bankers and lenders wouldn’t give loans to people who had little probability of paying them back
That would be Lyndon Johnson, dear.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 08:48:11
” Yes, that’s right, and OBAMA wanted the government to CONTROL all the lending, because, well, the mean, ugly, nasty, bankers and lenders wouldn’t give loans to people who had little probability of paying them back, so the GOVERNMENT went in to “Fix it”.”
This is a lie. There was no difference to the banks whether the borrowers paid student loans back or not because they were government guaranteed. They got paid no matter what. However, the private banks charged more for doing the origination (and whatever other fees they tacked on) than the government did. So much more, in fact, that they were willing to pay enormous kick backs to the financial aid offices in the colleges to become the default paperwork that the school would pass out to students. Even with the kickbacks, the fees were so profitable that they were making a mint on the backs of 18 year olds who didn’t know there even was another place (government direct) to get the money that charged much lower fees.
The real private loans - the ones that aren’t government guaranteed - require a co-signer or an income or both and they can’t be discharged in bankruptcy. The government has not gotten involved in this market.
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 09:20:54
Polly, aren’t these the loans that Obama moved back to the gov in the health care law?
I’m just glad that I placed a premium on paying those loans back BEFORE the nesting instinct kicked in.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 09:41:38
What “these” are you talking about?
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 11:41:22
Government-backed student loans — the old Stafford stuff. My understanding was that the Bush Admin allowed private banks to originate and service the government loans. That’s how those banks were allowed to snow the financial aid offices with their own paperwork. Of course if the student defaulted, it was the gov on the hook.
Obama didn’t like that the banks got the juicy profits while the taxpayer got the losses, so he reversed that Bush position and added it to Obamacare — that half of Obamacare that passed by reconciliation .
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2012-08-08 11:58:32
The SS deductions help create greater “re-distribution”.
“Greater” implies that Obama has re-distributed wealth from rich to poor. (which is greatly needed) But on a Macro level, the only wealth redistribution under Obama was the continued wealth redistribution from the middle-class to the rich. So why spout mis-leading propaganda?
The USA has re-distributed wealth for 40 years but all I got was laid-off and this lousy T-Shirt
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 13:58:02
Yes, oxide, those are the loans that were taken away from the banks, the ones where they had the risk and obligations of an administrator and got the profits as if they were actually making the loans, but even more profit than if they were the real lenders because they took no losses.
The private loans are still private.
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 15:52:45
Sign at an Occupy rally:
“Our jobs went to China and all we got were lousy T-shirts”
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2012-08-09 01:24:30
The real private loans - the ones that aren’t government guaranteed - require a co-signer or an income or both and they can’t be discharged in bankruptcy.
If they aren’t government-guaranteed, then why shouldn’t they be dischargable in BK?
“Many of these retirees aren’t even in hock for their own educations. Consumer advocates say that in the majority of the cases they’ve seen, the borrowers went into debt later in life to help defray education costs for their children or other dependents. Harold Grodberg, an elder law attorney in Bayonne, N.J., says he’s worked with at least six clients in the past two years whose problems started with loans they signed up for to help pay for their grandchildren’s tuition.”
I wonder if any of those grandchildren occupied Wall Street?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2012-08-08 08:06:16
if any of those grandchildren occupied Wall Street?
The picture you reference had nothing to do with the OWS protests. It’s either doctored or from an incident elsewhere.
The “81PCT” markings on the car indicate that it’s an 81st precinct car.
The 81st precinct is located in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn (http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/precincts/precinct_081.shtml), which was NOT policing the protests.
The site of the OWS protests is in New York’s 1st precinct, which, as can be seen in this photo (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_AeedZ8X-zY0/TOglwy9qjHI/AAAAAAAAGXk/XVTycaFrzmA/s1600/IMG_1741.JPG), are marked “1PCT”
A (interesting?) real estate investment strategy post:
I like the strategy of low housing cost leaving me fat stacks of cash to spend on traveling to cultural events. I believe it was Polly who prefers the opposite strategy, of extremely expensive housing in exchange for the DC area free culture buffet.
Whatever makes each of us happy, to each their own or whatever. However yesterday’s bits had a comment by az slim about an astronomy themed bar in Tucson. Tucson! I would have never guessed. I’ve been into astronomy and space exploration since I was a kid, but I’ve never heard of this bar until yesterdays bits. Because I’m not limited by high housing expenses, I can fly there just to visit a bar. Well it would be a lot more fun to visit during a launch or landing, than just any random day. And it needs to favorably intersect with the work/kids/school schedule that prevents me from doing “culture” for about 99% of my time. But I can certainly afford to do it, and probably will. Not this year (too much stuff already scheduled) maybe not even next year, but someday I will drink a beer at the astronomy bar while watching a launch or landing … and I’ll be paying the whole way in cash, because I can, because of where I live.
I think it is a somewhat superior strategy, at least for me, because “my culture” is (unfortunately?) all over the map. If I could live in one hyperexpensive city that hosted a CA makerfaire, a NYC Hope conference (2006 was a blast), a REAL N.O. cajun food restaurant, a Dayton hamvention, a TED conference (which I can (barely) afford but could never get the unobtainable tickets which is probably just as well), a Huntsville space museum (at least in the early 90s it was the coolest museum on the planet), az slim’s now world famous astronomy bar, a bike trail and a snow shoe trail in the north woods of Wisconsin, then I’d think, just think, about moving to that super-expensive super-city. At least some of what I’ve already done and some of what I wanna do probably appeal to some of you, but not all, my point being that as a group its probably not even theoretically possible for “a city” to appeal to everyone or even appeal to more than a tiny minority of people.
So that’s the long version of my investment strategy of putting money into planes / trains / automobiles instead of renting real estate from the bank. Inspired by az slims recent discovery of the astronomy bar. Tucson… who ever would have guessed?
For metro DC that is impressive. It’s easier to stay below that ratio in flyover (assuming a better than Lucky Ducky job). Less than 15% here, but more importantly haven’t mowed a lawn or shoveled snow in 7 years.
And by the way, we have two Air and Space museums in the DC area. I go to free lectures regularly at the DC based one (they have lecture series in the fall and spring) bringing in scientists deeply involved in exploration. I haven’t even been out to the public displays at Goddard (I bet there are bars near Goddard where you could hang out with other space enthusiasts). Smithsonian runs observation nights out in VA during new moons. The Carnegie Institute also brings in scientists for the Capital Science series throughout the year. Also free, though it covers all kinds of science. There is a group that runs science cafes in Alexandria every month - happy hour plus cheap appetizers followed by presentations and discussions.
Hamvention? Is that for ham radios? I’m sure there is a group here. You’d just have to google for it. One of the advantages of being in a place where there are a lot of people. You can find other people who are into the same stuff you are, no matter what that is. Is it better to go to a group gathering once every few years, or to a meeting with fewer people who share your interests once a month? People who could actually become your friends.
We certainly have plenty of bike trails. And bike clubs. And people who bike to work. And a lot of Metro stations have both regular racks and enclosed lockers that you can rent if you are going to bike to public transportation.
If you explain the other stuff you mention, I’ll find that for you here as well.
I don’t know about you, but I only get a few weeks of vacation a year and about a week of it (minimum) is needed for family obligations. I have no desire to live most of my life for the sake of a few weeks of vacation per year.
Uh-oh. Slim is going to have to take a trip to DC. The astronomy and bicycling scenes are way too tempting.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 09:43:59
My floor is your floor, slim. With air mattress. Or the sofa. Friend who stopped by for a conference she had in the city said it was very comfy.
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-08-08 10:19:04
My floor is your floor, slim. With air mattress. Or the sofa. Friend who stopped by for a conference she had in the city said it was very comfy.
You’re on!
Hmmm, for my next trick, I’ll be looking at affordable airfares into Our Nation’s Capital. Do you recommend the BWI, then Amtrak into the District route? Dulles? Or National?
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 11:42:41
Hey you two, I want in.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 11:47:38
BWI usually has the cheapest fares. Amtrak will get you to Union Station. On weekdays, you can also take a MARC train to Union Station. And there is a bus that will get you to the Greenbelt Metro Station (I think). Dulles is hard to get to/from by public transport, but it can be done by bus. National is very easy by public transporation (Metro goes right there), but usually has the most expensive fares.
Southwest goes to BWI.
Contact me off line for the sort of stuff you want to do so we can discuss timing. I like the Environmental Film Festival which is early March. Cherry Blossoms are lovely, but the city is very crowded. But I can find free and/or cheap stuff at all times of year. The play on Monday was free. If it doesn’t rain, the Marine Corps Band is playing a concert on the steps of the Capitol building tonight - I love Ralph Vaughan Williams. The National Youth Orchestra of Canada is at Strathmore tomorrow - free. I could keep going. The science lectures tend to go a little quiet during the summer, but they will all be back in the fall.
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-08-08 12:36:54
Contact me off line for the sort of stuff you want to do so we can discuss timing. I like the Environmental Film Festival which is early March.
I just sent you an e-mail, polly.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 14:08:06
Oxide,
You don’t need space on my floor.
Find a way to contact Slim. She can forward your e-mail to my home e-mail. We can make this a threesome.
One limitation. I have promised to play hostess to my parents and godparents sometime in the spring. And that is going to involve actually escorting them around, not just pointing them at events and museums and going to work. Not sure when.
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-08-08 14:37:00
Find a way to contact Slim. She can forward your e-mail to my home e-mail. We can make this a threesome.
My housing costs are 20% of our net income including taxes and utilities. We live in a nice development but in the smallest house in it (2000 sq ft). We also put 30% down 18 uears ago. We must have been suckers playing by the rules.
Whatever makes each of us happy, to each their own or whatever. However yesterday’s bits had a comment by az slim about an astronomy themed bar in Tucson. Tucson! I would have never guessed. I’ve been into astronomy and space exploration since I was a kid, but I’ve never heard of this bar until yesterdays bits. Because I’m not limited by high housing expenses, I can fly there just to visit a bar
And guess who will be there, ready to welcome you to Tucson. I call for an HBB meetup at the SkyBar! Anyone and everyone is invited! Let’s give vinceinwaukesha a proper welcome to the Old Pueblo!
In 2004-2005 while working for TARP bank, we would sometimes call bank customers with existing HELOCs with low or zero balances to encourage them to draw money on them, a campaign called “Activation”. For every $1,000 these customers “activated” on their HELOCs we received $5 commission. Easy money compared with selling new HELOCs or loans. Our small but proud contribution to the bubble
Vince, you don’t have to go as far as Wisconsin to find cheap housing. For example, here’s a house that’s within a 2 hour drive and a 1/2 hour Metro ride to the Smithsonian:
In fact there are some supercommuters who live just over the MD/PA line and commute into the northern suburbs each day. If they were smart, they would have bought a $70K house leaving them fat stacks of cash, and then retire in the house as an Oil City plan. But no, those yahoos “drove until they could afford” a new build.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 09:40:44
Darnit, sorry wrong thread. This was to answer vince about living cheap and traveling to culture.
By the way, there are a LOT of people who don’t take advantage of the nearby culture either. Many MD residents haven’t been within sight of the Washington Monument in years. I go downtown occasionally, but to be honest I’m so frustrated with Metro delays and screaming tourists of stroller age that I don’t go often.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 11:57:47
Which is why it is great to live close enough that if the Metro is a mess, I can just take the bus in on a weekend. Just one bus will get me from my place to right across the street from Air and Space in less than 50 minutes on a weekend and I can read during the trip.
Sarah Palin: Mama grizzlies united
By Diana Reese CLEVELAND, Mo—Sarah Palin did not disappoint.
“The crowd cheered and applauded repeatedly during her speech here Friday night, from her opening remarks about “mama grizzlies” on the Missouri state flag to her promise to stop at the local Chick-fil-A for a midnight snack.
Palin was in the Kansas City area to campaign for Sarah Steelman, who’s in a tight three-way race in Tuesday’s Republican primary for Missouri’s U.S. Senate seat. The winner will face Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) in November.
Palin was there to lend some of her magic to Steelman, who shares not only her conservative views but an independence and willingness to buck the political system. (One of Steelman’s goals is to end Congressional pensions, for example.)
Somehow, Palin has achieved celebrity status since the 2008 election. How many failed vice presidential candidates and former Alaska governors end up with book deals and reality TV shows? With an estimated net worth of $12 million?
When Palin took to the makeshift stage in the middle of a Missouri farm field, she was dressed more for the part of Hollywood celebrity than serious politician. But it was hard for me to take Palin seriously dressed as she was.
First, her shoes: Five-inch wedges. Her black capris weren’t quite skin-tight but tight enough, and her t-shirt with its Superman logo (a Steelman campaign shirt emblazoned with “Our freedom. Our fight.”) emphasized her figure. She never once removed her oversized sunglasses.”
“When Palin took to the makeshift stage in the middle of a Missouri farm field, she was dressed more for the part of Hollywood celebrity than serious politician.”
No she wasn’t. She as dressed like a white trash meth head. I saw that picture.
The RNC sure does fire lots of bullets for the American voter to dodge.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2012-08-08 07:29:04
the DNC gave us Obama…. a make-believe candidate with a made-up past. Give us a break please.
remember also that Pelosi signed the qualifications statement in two forms, one for Hawaii saying he met the Constitutional requirements for Office and one for everyone else, which does not say he qualified under the Constitution of the U.S.
and….. he got elected.
The effect of all the executive orders is only beginning to take hold, and the Costs of “healthcare” will be added starting NEXT year, conveniently, after the next election cycle.
I’ve never understood the criticism of Palin, when you stand her next to the gaftster BIDEN, she looks like a genius.
Comment by goon squad
2012-08-08 07:36:39
Give us a break please
I’m not criticizing Palin, she looks hot in that pic. I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-08-08 08:06:08
I’m not criticizing Palin, she looks hot in that pic. I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.
I get your drift. Say what you will about Joe Biden, he sure ended up with a hottie for a second wife.
Comment by UNKNOWN TENANT
2012-08-08 08:49:36
“I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.”
+1 x the US National Debt
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2012-08-08 09:25:45
“I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.”
If these are the choices I think we should take our lead from Sarah and others who preach abstinence.
Comment by oxide
2012-08-08 09:28:28
Sorry Sarah, Steelman lost the primary yesterday.
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2012-08-08 10:15:28
Sorry Oxide, but Cruz won the primary last week. It’s hilarious how the PDS sufferers ignore her wins (about 60-70%) and focus on her losses.
Comment by scdave
2012-08-08 10:53:06
the Costs of “healthcare” will be added starting NEXT year ??
Yeah…The owner of Pappa Johns (Romney Contributor) had his crying towel out today complaining about the new health care requirement going to cost an extra 14-cents per pizza…14-fricken extra cents for a pizza in return for health care…
Why is it that almost every woman running for office gets trashed for what she wears. Humm, could it be men are afraid that they’ll get into office show them up? I think most men should be afraid, very afraid!
Another leftist paper hanger finding time to criticize Palin. It’s amazing the obsession the LEFT has with her. She can’t go outside without them finding fault with her family, her dress, her demeanor, her speech, where she shops, what she eats, and whatever she has to say.
It’s almost non-stop.
And, yet, I am CERTAIN that if this same writer saw Obama in a ‘gansta’ hoodie with a backward ball cap and pants hanging down around his butt, she would think he was “hip”, not a moronic-looking dumbass, and of course, would take him quite seriously because he can read a script.
And, yet, I am CERTAIN that if this same writer saw Obama in a ‘gansta’ hoodie with a backward ball cap and pants hanging down around his butt, she would think he was “hip”, not a moronic-looking dumbass, and of course, would take him quite seriously because he can read a script.
Speaking as someone who has more than a little bit of script reading experience, it’s not that easy. Nor is using a Teleprompter. I would love to have one of those when I’m on the air. But the station doesn’t have the budget, so I just have to make do with reading off paper and a computer screen.
As for the hoodie, low-slung pants, and backward baseball cap thing, I think it looks stupid. And you’ve probably noticed that President Obama doesn’t dress that way.
First, her shoes: Five-inch wedges. Her black capris weren’t quite skin-tight but tight enough, and her t-shirt with its Superman logo (a Steelman campaign shirt emblazoned with “Our freedom. Our fight.”) emphasized her figure. She never once removed her oversized sunglasses.”
How in the Sam Hill did she walk in those shoes? They sound like a moving OSHA violation!
Update on what I mentioned about a week ago about the shortage of the Red plastic gas cans in the South . Lawyers bankrupted the small USA company that made them , because people were pouring gas on fires with them, and being made in the US ,were fair game to lawsuits .
There are red plastic gas cans available again now in the stores, they cost 3 times what the old ones did , are No-name (Chinese) , and are plastered with warnings about not pouring gas on fires.We bet they will get brittle in 6 months ,too,
The feral money-sucking lawyers made theirs on the lawsuits , now we pay with almost certainly cheaper quality , but much higher priced items,
You blame the lawyers because they were hired by stupid people?
Contrary to popular belief, lawyers really can’t initiate lawsuits on their own, even though the “ambulance chasing” rules and regulations have been slightly lessened over the years, they are still very restricted from actively pursuing clients…. just for that reason.
The more likely reason is that the mfg did what everyone else did: just stop operations here to save a buck and ordered form the Chinese and then blamed it on fabricated circumstances beyond their control, much like local governments like to blame public unions for their budget shortfalls instead of the billions in tax breaks they gave large corporations.
Comment by Harry Connick Jr Community College Graduate
2012-08-08 08:11:13
That’s what I thought. I see so many lawyer ads. I think I can call anyone anytime of the day for the flimsiest of the reason and I still think the lawyers would most likely “work” with me building a case.
That’s my retirement plan.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2012-08-08 11:58:42
my now three year old son is going to be a starting pitcher with the NY Yankees…that’s my retirmenet plan.
Comment by Harry Connick Jr Community College Graduate
2012-08-08 15:07:33
my now three year old son is going to be a starting pitcher with the NY Yankees…that’s my retirmenet plan.
I think my odds are better. I will always find a lawyer to sue for me.
…even though the “ambulance chasing” rules and regulations have been slightly lessened over the years, they are still very restricted from actively pursuing clients
Are you telling me that if the lawyer was the one injured pouring gas out of the can on to the fire that he cannot initiate a lawsuit and be his own lawyer or expand it to a class action suit?
No. How in the world did you read that into my post?
Sorry, I thought it was understood we were talking about OTHER people suing the company.
But honestly, I AM just speculating because Jess has posted no link or reference or way to verify his story. Maybe it WAS a lawyer who did this by himself.
On December 28, 2005, David Calder tried to start a fire in his wood-burning stove in his trailer home—by inserting the nozzle of a $3.99 gas can into the stove to pour gas onto the fire, which Calder admitted was “stupid.” (The container itself had “KEEP AWAY FROM FLAMES, PILOT LIGHTS, STOVES, HEATERS, ELECTRIC MOTORS, AND OTHER SOURCES OF IGNITION.” impressed into the plastic; nevertheless, Calder included a failure-to-warn claim in his suit.) The resulting catastrophe killed his two-year-old daughter and severely burned Calder. This was, Calder argued, the fault of Blitz USA, the manufacturer of the gas can, for not including more idiot-proofing, though no gas container could reasonably protect against the idiocy of Calder’s actions. A Clinton-appointed federal district judge refused to throw the case out, and refused to let Blitz USA argue the “state-of-the-art” product liability defense or argue that it complied with government regulations for the manufacture of gas cans. A sympathetic jury found millions of dollars of damages, and blamed Blitz USA to the tune of 70% of the damages. So Blitz USA, which used to employ 117 people at a factory in Oklahoma to manufacture about 75% of the gas cans sold in the US, is liquidating in bankruptcy, and Americans will have to get their gas cans from Chinese manufacturers—or resort to even more unsafe containers like milk jugs if there is a gas-can shortage during this year’s hurricane season. So trial lawyer greed and a trial-lawyer-friendly judicial appointment has cost jobs, made Americans less safe, and increased carbon emissions from the need to import bulky gas cans from overseas.
I do think that plaintiffs’ lawyers, if they get a really good recovery on some action, go trolling for more clients to do the same thing with. That can be anything from product liability to child abuse lawsuits. The truth of the matter is irrelevant. All they have to do is convince a stupid jury, or get a nice settlement.
“Tort reform” reformed nothing but consequences for negligent business entities.
But wait, aren’t you a champion of free market values and less regulations? And what’s more free market than suing for negligence because there was less regulation?
They shouldn’t sue? Than how do you redress negligence? No regs, no lawsuits? What does that leave? Name calling?
Since when does a free market mean you can sue anyone for any reason for the slimmest hopes of hitting a jackpot?
How about we have loser pays? That is VERY free market. You bring a lawsuit and you lose - you pay for the other guy’s cost.
Ah - but the trial lawyers and democrats will not allow that.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hi-Z
2012-08-08 13:23:19
I agree that loser paying all costs would change this game totally and to the good. There would be less settlements; suits would proceed to a conclusion based on merits.
Comment by 2banana
2012-08-08 14:16:55
And about 95% of suits would NEVER be filed.
I agree that loser paying all costs would change this game totally and to the good. There would be less settlements; suits would proceed to a conclusion based on merits.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 14:43:01
It also means that the little guy would never be able to sue. You can’t be totally sure you will win a case no matter how good the merits. And the big corporations can hire an army of lawyers just to jack up their costs. So if you figure you have a 70% chance of winning, but that 30% chance of losing means you will incur $10 million of the other sides’ costs = losing everything you have. Too much risk.
The real solution is for the person who sues to get reimbursed for the cost to them of the injury (medical, lost wages, etc.) and some reimbursment for pain and suffering and a reasonable hourly rate to go to their attorney and the rest of the award - the part that is supposed make the big company not do that anymore - goes elsewhere. Perhaps directly to pay down government debt. Because if the award is too small, it just leaves business saying that hurting people is fine/acceptable cost of doing business. Bad idea. But giving the part that is to punish the company to the person who is hurt is absurd - the amount has no relation to his injury. The money should go elsewhere. And bringing the compensation to the attorney down to a reaonable hourly rate also gets rid of the lawyer’s over sized incentive to bring the suits.
Comment by Hi-Z
2012-08-08 17:14:55
Polly;
Your solution just means more rules and more lawyers. Keep it simple; if you lose you pay. If it is important enough to sue, it is important enough to pay when you lose (English Rule). Nearly every Western democracy, other than the United States, follows the English rule.
What country has the most lawyers per capita?
U.S.A.: There is one lawyer for every 265 Americans.
Comment by measton
2012-08-08 19:57:54
OK but if you sue you can dictate how much both sides can spend and it has to be equal. ie if I use a 300 dollar an hour lawyer you get one 300 dollar an hour lawyer and anytime the corporate lawyer bills more than my lawyer the corporation is responsible for that amount.
Comment by polly
2012-08-08 20:21:03
Which leaves you with zero chance to access the legal system for anyone who isn’t 100% sure they can win against the largest legal team the party that injured them can put forward. Mom and pop store? They’ll get sued by everyone because their legal team is no larger than yours. Big multinationals can do anything they want and never even get sued because you can’t win against the full resources of their legal team. Just another form of “too big to fail.” Welcome to justice by the rich, for the rich and only for the rich.
Wall Street thinks better of extending three-day winning streak, at least to start.
Aug. 8, 2012, 10:05 a.m. EDT
U.S. stocks lose steam after 3-day rise
By Kate Gibson, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks started lower on Wednesday, with investors sidelined after a three-session winning streak.
“It appears this week’s three-day global stock market rally is running out of steam. Overnight, we saw Spanish debt yields drift slightly higher, providing a minor downtick in this near-term trading indicator for the euro,” emailed Fred Dickson, chief investment strategist at Davidson Cos.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA -0.03%) declined 13.10 points, or 0.1%, to 13,156.9.
…
I’ve been trying to wrap my brain around where we are headed and I came to the conclusion that home mortgages should follow the bank interest rates down to the two percent level. That will drive more speculators and investors to pull money out of the bank for property as well as the old timers turning to property management (ie. LL). The people already in housing and not under water will be able to refi at lower rates and have more spendable income to support the economy. At low rates housing would be transferred to stronger hands and we wouldn’t need QW 3.
I see a 30-year same-as-cash era coming up for houses. Imagine the prices houses could go to if you knew you were not paying any interest at all!!! Instant extra equity after the first payment and all that. I’ll tell ya, it will be a real men of genius market then.
I think you may be right about where interest rates are going. The FED is trying to push them down in the belief that low rates “stimulate” business. I am of the contention that low rates stimulate mal-investment.
That is how we got here in the first place. We are following Japan’s lead to an economy wherein investment returns are ZERO.
Why invest? Without market-set interest rates and 100% reserve banking, the “markets” don’t know where to put their money.
It’s like the Soviets “planned economy”. They made lots of stuff no one wanted and couldn’t get the stuff people did. We could build “solar energy” plants like Solyndra. Yea, that’s what we need. With Free money we can all think like Obama. WE can build ANYTHING. That will create employment. Build Citrus farms in Alaska. Yea.
I have a dream. I have a vision!!
Who knows, maybe we can get more ‘investment’ in real estate and push up prices to 2005 levels. Wouldn’t that be nice?
Why choose citrus farms in Alaska and Solyndra why not the internet, the US highway system, all the benefits that came from gov sponsored research, etc
1. Rebuild our infrastructure -Schools, roads, transmission grid, communications.
2. Why not increase our energy efficiency and install cogeneration in all gov buildings 2-3 x as efficient as central power an.d requires labor
3. Alternative energy we could tax foreign oil to make it happen,
4. Cut payroll taxes make labor more affordable in the US, we could use debt VAT tax energy tax to pay for it.
Is this really all you have in terms of energy plans?
We’ve got literally trillions of dollars of oil/gas available in the US. Yet the left’s efforts are devoted to Solyndra tax credits and caulking windows in govt buildings.
Ooops I almost forgot the other central plan in Obama’s energy policy. Inflate your tires.
The solar panel and install business is booming and has been even through the current economy. The Solydrna failure is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall industry activity.
Yes, it’s that big and growing. Google News.
Energy and mfg are about to change radically. No, I take that back: ARE changing radically.
There is a very successful craft brewery in Fort Collins (New Belgium, the makers of Fat Tire) that use 100% renewable energy. And New Belgium isn’t a mom-n-pop operation. It’s one of the biggest, if not the biggest, craft brewer in the USA. If you are ever in Fort Collins I recommend that you take the tour (free samples at the end too)
transmission grid
and Energy and mfg are about to change radically.
Considering getting my MSEE for this reason. Already have the BS. Why the MS? Because I’ve been out of the industry, so to speak, being more on the biz development side.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2012-08-08 16:08:31
Plus a lot of employers won’t touch if you don’t have a Master’s
How would your analysis change if you discovered that the FED actually does not control interest rates? Can you think of another reason that interest rates might be low? Would that make you want to buy a house?
The recession is over—but not for you. From penniless retirement accounts to frozen wages, demographic uneasiness to inept lawmakers, Newsweek’s David Frum breaks down the bad news.
Corporate profits are setting records. Companies hold mountains of cash. Private-sector output is growing 3 percent per year, in line with historic norms.
But jobs? The middling July numbers warn that it’s likely another half decade before the U.S. returns to full employment. How about prospects for a raise? Make us laugh. The future? Scary. The panic of 2008 has subsided, replaced by an ambient anxiety.
Crushed by debt, American households can’t afford to buy enough to put everyone to work. Even when households can afford to buy more, they are often buying products made by Chinese and Indian workers who work very nearly as well as Americans for a lot less pay. All of us are left to wonder: What happens to me in this new world? When can I retire? Where do I put what’s left of my savings? Will Medicare still exist when I need it?
In this election year, both presidential candidates are competing to offer a response to the anxious mood. President Obama urges Americans to put their trust in more and bigger government. In an important speech in Kansas last year, the president defined his vision for the American middle class: more government employment, more government contracting to stabilize employment in the private sector, and higher taxes on wealthier Americans to pay for it all.
Challenger Mitt Romney has not been so explicit, but his message is equally clear: don’t fight anxiety—embrace it. Medicare will become a voucher for Americans under 55. Medicaid and other social programs will radically shrink. Restrictions on the financial industry will be rolled back. Even less will be guaranteed than today—in the hope of unleashing pent-up dynamism.
About 46 percent of the country rejects the Obama approach. Another 46 percent rejects the Romney proposal. There’s not much enthusiasm anywhere for either. Four years ago, Americans looked to politics for “hope” and “change.” Today’s mood is bleaker. The incumbent seems defeated by the nation’s worries. The challenger seems indifferent to them. Altogether, the political system seems overwhelmed.
Fewer than one third of Americans believe the country is on the right track. Suicides are up; birth rates are down. Business leaders say they can’t hire because they feel so uncertain about future government regulation; consumers won’t buy because they feel so uncertain about their future incomes.
In past periods of economic distress—the 1890s and 1930s—Americans protested in the streets. Not this time. Occupy Wall Street has gone home. The Tea Party has been absorbed into the Republican Party. Today, Americans have been left to face their worries alone.
…
While they blame the patient for taking drugs without a medical need ,the question becomes why are the Doctors writing these
prescriptions that no doubt makes Pharma drug companies richer . This article places the entire blame on the person taking these addiction drugs ,while the Doctor and Drug Company isn’t part of the cause ,or even addressed as medical abuse .
There has been a serious detachment from the part the greedy
medical /Pharma industry is playing in being the ‘Dope Pusher “. This is also the case for all the anti-depression drugs that are handed out like candy these days by the medical/psychology fields.
A neighbor of mine was given a long term anti-depression drug by a doctor just because she was going through short term stress
because her husband was having a back operation . The neighbor is now on this anti-depression long term and her personality is like a zombie now .
No doubt the Doctor got perks from the Drug Company for writing such a absurd prescription .
Life has some short term stress in it at times ,but is this cause to keep a person on a anit-depression drug long term at a huge expense to this womens health , as well as the overall health care costs ?
That’s why I say ,the corruption has to be taken out of the Medical business and the high cost American health care for us to come close to a sustainable health care system . Would these
people take these anit-depression drugs long term if they knew that it will knock 10 to 20 years off their life span, or raise the risk of suicide ? The whole trend these days is how many drugs
can a Doctor get a patient on ,without really trying . This is what happens when you have Drug Companies making about 4 trillion a year,while being a big lobby group .
I content that the corruption is huge in the Health care industry and drug industry and not only with the Banks and
Wall Street investment firms .
As mentioned here before, I’m not going through the easiest of times, what with dealing with the declining health of now it’s up to four family members and my own struggles to get my business back to what it was before this Great Recession.
What truly amazes me is that no one has suggested that I go into therapy or get on some sort of drug. I guess I don’t hang around the doctor/pharma types very much, I dunno.
But if I were more of the doctor-going type, I’m sure I’d be toting all sorts of scrips. Not that I’d fill them, mind you, but oh, would they be offered.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-08-08 10:39:52
Slim I order you to see a shrink….or better yet be a DJ…..it helps soothe the blues away!!!
Comment by Arizona Slim
2012-08-08 11:44:16
Slim I order you to see a shrink….or better yet be a DJ…..it helps soothe the blues away!!!
Funny you should mention the blues, NYC.
Because that will be my next scheduled show on KXCI. August 19 at 5 p.m. Get ready for an hour of women in the blues.
Tonight I experienced the ultimate alternative to a visit to a shrink: A Branford Marsalis concert! Nobody ever told me in my music school days that playing music was supposed to be fun…
Comment by Carl Morris
2012-08-09 18:47:41
Cool. Wyton’s attitude gets on my nerves but I like Branford.
“There has been a serious detachment from the part the greedy medical /Pharma industry is playing in being the ‘Dope Pusher.’ This is also the case for all the anti-depression drugs that are handed out like candy these days by the medical/psychology fields.”
Yep, and even worse is that the massive amounts of chemicals/drugs you are feeding into your system are useless about 75% of the time. The side effects are real, but the medical effects are not:
penniless retirement accounts to frozen wages, demographic uneasiness to inept lawmakers,…Corporate profits are setting records. Companies hold mountains of cash….American households can’t afford to buy enough to put everyone to work. Even when households can afford to buy more, they are often buying products made by Chinese and Indian workers
All of the above is the end result of massive wealth redistribution from the average American to the super-rich - Reagan/Romney Voodoo Economics.
So let’s double down with Romney’s tax plan that takes more from the middle to give to the top. Yea. That’s the ticket.
“Corporate profits are setting records. Companies hold mountains of cash. Private-sector output is growing 3 percent per year, in line with historic norms.”
This doubles as (part of) the reason for a 13k Dow but why “the market” doesn’t correlate well with “the economy.”
Immigrants lag behind native-born Americans on most measures of economic well-being — even those who have been in the U.S. the longest, according to a report from the Center for Immigration Studies, which argues that full assimilation is a more complex task than overcoming language or cultural differences.
The study, which covers all immigrants, legal and illegal, and their U.S.-born children younger than 18, found that immigrants tend to make economic progress by most measures the longer they live in the U.S. but lag well behind native-born Americans on factors such as poverty, health insurance coverage and homeownership.
The study, based on 2010 and 2011 census data, found that 43 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S. at least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as high as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent immigrants.
The report was released at a time when both major presidential candidates have backed policies that would make it easier to immigrate legally and would boost the numbers of people coming to the U.S.
Steven A. Camarota, the center’s research director and author of the 96-page study, said it shows that questions about the pros and cons of immigration extend well beyond the sheer numbers and touch on the broader consequences of assimilating a population defined by tougher socioeconomic challenges.
“Look, we know a lot of these folks are going to be poor, we get it. But don’t tell the public it’s all going great, which is the story line I think a lot of people want to sell,” Mr. Camarota said. “There is progress over time. Every measure shows improvement over time, but still, the situation does not look like we’d like it to look, particularly for the less-educated. They lag well behind natives even when they’ve been here for two decades, and that is very disconcerting.”
Federal law requires that the government deny immigrant visas to potential immigrants who are likely to be unable to support themselves and thereby become public charges.
On Tuesday, a handful of Republican senators wrote to the Homeland Security and State departments asking them to explain why they don’t consider whether potential immigrants would use many of the nearly 80 federal welfare programs when they evaluate visa applications.
Neither department responded to messages Tuesday seeking a response to the senators’ letter.
Expanding legal immigration is a contentious issue for voters, the vast majority of whom tell pollsters that they want the levels either retained or decreased.
But most politicians want legal immigration expanded.
During his time in the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama backed bills that would have dramatically boosted legal immigration, potentially by hundreds of thousands a year. As president, he has called for the same thing.
Immigrants made up more than half of all farmworkers, 41 percent of taxi drivers and 48 percent of maids and housecleaners, but they also represented about one-third of all computer programmers and 27 percent of doctors.
The center found that use of public benefits varied dramatically based on where immigrants originated.
Mexicans were most likely to use means-tested benefit programs, with 57 percent, while 6 percent of those from the United Kingdom did. The rate for native-born Americans is 23 percent.
———————————————————————————-
“the situation does not look like we’d like it to look, particularly for the less-educated. They lag well behind natives even when they’ve been here for two decades, and that is very disconcerting.”
That is disconcerting, when did we become natives? Well that doesn`t look like we’d like it to look at all. So how about this….
Let the less-educated immigrants take out some student loans and get educated so the federal government can get some of our money back by withholding it from their nearly 80 federal welfare programs like they do with native-born Americans and their Social Security benefits. That will fix it.
Let the less-educated immigrants take out some student loans and get educated …………
you actually believe “education” is the problem.
I submit that letting these people into the school system would only drag down the quality of education and the results of public education to levels more in line with Mexico.
“you actually believe “education” is the problem.”
Um, that was a joke.
And as far as “public education to levels more in line with Mexico.” you drive by Jerry Thomas Elementary in Jupiter Fl. at 3PM when the kids get out and you would think you were in Mexico, or Guatemala. ESOL is big here.
I rather we make it much tougher to immigrate to the U.S. IQ above 120 and clean background we will take you. IQ 110 and above, we will consider you. IQ 100-110 unless you have a skill we need, no. Below 100, no way. No family reunification policy. There a policy that works, it is racially neutral and the high IQ people will generate more jobs than they take so we even reduce unemployment.
Comment by Harry Connick Jr Community College Graduate
2012-08-08 08:24:24
I think Canada does that at some level with its point system.
Come to think of it, Individual legal immigrants (people on visa) in USA are mostly with IQ of 100 or above; students, business people, skilled workers, etc. The people crossing the border, visa lottery winners, family visa types, refugees, etc. makes it worse for us….I think.
OT, I would be interested to know if there’s a connection between the increase of welfare state in US and the increase of border crossing.
Obama just gutted the Welfare Reform bill signed by Bill Clinton. Expect the 43% to go much, much higher in the coming years.
I don’t blame the immigrants for this. If the govt hands out welfare like candy, you can’t be mad at people for taking it. This is all part of a concerted effort by the left to get as many people permanently dependent on govt as possible. Every new welfare recipient - native born or immigrant - is a life long Democrat voter.
Please consider looking beyond the talking points sometime? The law Obama signed returned some powers to the States in regard to disposition of federal welfare assistance funding. So-called “Workfare” is not a cost effective program, (that means it costs more to administer than it saves, Smithers) and the paperwork issues alone were the reason for this “gutting welfare reform” legislation.
It’s useful to look beyond the talking points to get to the truth, but it does take a certain commitment to seeking it out….
A number of my work colleges, have interest only mortgages. In the 1980’s early 1990’s these where common in the UK; the mortgage would be paid off by an endowment policy invested in shares and bonds (this would cover the mortgage and leave you with a healthy lump sum, or so the salesmen said).
Today in work I spent a happy hour listening to a college arguing with a Help Desk about his mortgage, his endowment had paid up but he was twelve thousand pounds short. The gist of the conversation was from his point of view how they’d cover the short fall and from there’s how would he cover the short fall. No decision was made but I fear it won’t end well for him.
This conversation lead to two questions popping into my mind
1) How could this have come as a surprise to him
and
2) Are endowment mortgages a UK only occurrence or are they sold in other countries?
Comment by Harry Connick Jr Community College Graduate
2012-08-08 08:32:47
2) Are endowment mortgages a UK only occurrence or are they sold in other countries?
Can’t speak of endowment in US. When I owned a home, I set up an escrow account with the bank. It was a common occurrence that my escrow ran short and the bank would withdraw as needed from my savings account. I don’t think there was a fraud or anything like that. At least I could not prove it.
The moral of the story is NEVER TRUST ANYONE TO MANAGE YOUR MONEY. There are always surprises, not the nice ones.
‘And the City-Data forums are overrun with NAR hacks.’
I’ve heard that before. So much so, I stopped frequenting the real estate forums there. I still listen to Gil Gross on Sundays on the local radio station here. I just can’t help myself. Love it when Larry Yun calls in and gives the real estate citrus report.
Indiana: Hundreds of manufacturing jobs go unfilled
CNNMoney.com - By Parija Kavilanz - August 8th, 2012
There are hundreds of factory jobs ready for the taking as the area’s manufacturing sector has come back to life after the recession.
But even with an unemployment rate as high as the national average, companies are struggling to hire workers.
His challenge: “I’ll have to go through 500 applicants just to get the 10 that I need. And there’s no guarantee that those 10 hires will work out.
A labor shortage isn’t the problem. Companies are getting hundreds of applicants, she said. But they are either not the right fit or unqualified.
“Applicants are failing drug tests,” she said. “Some apply and then decide they want to wait until their unemployment benefit runs out before taking a factory job.”
Then there are the candidates with four-year college degrees who can’t find other work. Manufacturers shy away from hiring them, believing they’ll leave as soon as they find a job that’s a better fit.
At Daman Manifolds, among hundreds of applications the company will review in coming weeks, half will likely get dumped because folks won’t fill out the entire eight-page form, Davis said. Another big chunk won’t make it past the phone interview.
Several more will fail the hands-on assessment because they lack the right skills.
Bell estimates that the state needs about 40,000 to 50,000 manufacturing workers right now to meet the uptick in production.
All four were offered a job, and only one accepted, he said. “These statistics are not unusual at all among manufacturers here,” he said.
One stays eligible for unemployment insurance if he turns down a job offer?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2012-08-08 13:34:39
No, but he had to go and fill out forms etc to prove that he or she was actively seeking a job and that was the question.
Comment by Combotechie
2012-08-08 16:55:58
The complete question involving him saying “no” to the job offer.
Comment by aNYCdj
2012-08-08 20:29:17
Its not that simple….what would I know about a machine that puts caps on bottles?
You are asking the wrong question.
Ok Should they take a job that was offered, and lose UI and maybe other benefits, and risk the boss is a psycho, and will fire you next week for being 38 minutes late because you were a witness for a car accident?
Then the boss claims you are unreliable and now have to fight to get your UI back which takes 8-10 weeks…..so how do you survive?
Curiously, the article omits mentioning the average pay. It also neglects to mention what the “right skills” are. Are these machinist jobs or are they assembly positions?
If the “right kind” of applicants aren’t showing up there is a simple, market based solution to the problem: pay more.
Heck, I see this in the software biz. Companies open reqs but can’t find people. More than once in my career, I received a job offer that paid LESS than my current salary. When I asked them if they were serious, they insisted that they were. When I asked them why should I take a new job at lower pay they simply shrugged their shoulders. I’m sure the hiring manager later told his boss “there’s no one to hire”
“Heck, I see this in the software biz. Companies open reqs but can’t find people. More than once in my career, I received a job offer that paid LESS than my current salary. When I asked them if they were serious, they insisted that they were. When I asked them why should I take a new job at lower pay they simply shrugged their shoulders. I’m sure the hiring manager later told his boss “there’s no one to hire”
And eventually one of two things happens.
1. The manager raises the rate and finds someone
2. The manager realizes the extra person isn’t needed after all.
As usual the free market sorts it all out. Amazing how that works, eh?
“not the right fit” is bullcrap. This means you offer NO training and orientation, which means you cut corners in other areas as well.
“wait until their unemployment benefit runs” tells us you don’t pay squat.
“believing they’ll leave as soon as they find a job that’s a better fit.”… and that’s different from everybody else, why? No, you don’t hire them because they might do a better job than their bosses… and you don’t pay squat.
8 page form? What is this, the 19th century? 8 pages? For what? Name and contact, employment history, references, criminal background, skills and education. Any more than that is none of your damn business.
But ultimately it’s ALL bullcrap. People will show up at the crack of dawn and shovel poop all day, every day, if the money is good.
“wait until their unemployment benefit runs” tells us you don’t pay squat.
Ding ding ding we have a winner. I had the max unemployment payment and it added up to about $20K after taxes. These manufacturers must be paying even less.
Sqeezed by debt crisis, Greek ditch cars for bikes
ekathimerini.com | Wednesday August 8, 2012 | By Karolina Tagaris
Greece’s dire economic plight has forced thousands of businesses to close, thrown one in five out of work and eroded the living standards of millions. But for bicycle-maker Giorgos Vogiatzis, it’s not all bad news.
The crisis has put cash-strapped Greeks on their bikes - once snubbed as a sign of poverty or just plain risky - and Greek manufacturers are shifting into fast gear.
The high cost of road tax, fuel and repairs is forcing Greeks to ditch their cars in huge numbers. According to the government’s statistics office, the number of cars on Greek roads declined by more than 40 percent in each of the last two years. Meanwhile, more than 200,000 bikes were sold in 2011, up about a quarter from the previous year.
A pay cut two years ago forced Koniaraki to give up her car under a ”cash for clunkers” scheme as she could no longer afford to pay the road tax or fill up her tank. She also moved from her house in a leafy northern Athens suburb to the centre.
And to get through a cash squeeze in March, she picked up a second-hand bike for the first time since childhood.
”At first my friends would laugh at me and say: Oh, poverty!” said Koniaraki, who now cycles to work from the foothills of the ancient Acropolis, past shop-gazing tourists in Plaka and through the bustling Syntagma square.
Greek manufacturers? Who knew? Seriously, it shows how austerity actually works. Less money going out for imported oil and money staying within the country for a product that they actually can manufacture.
The problem with the rich these days is they think they can blackmail their Countries by saying if you don’t give us low tax rates we will take our marbles and go somewhere else .That’s the game that Corporations and the Rich are playing these days in this new Globalized World .
I say let them go. You got millions of Spanards fleeing Spain because of unemployment . Many unemployed young people fleeing
Ireland because of no employment . USA has had it influx of people fleeing here illegally to find work and handouts .
Basically Globalism and lack of maintainingg proper borders and tariffs and Universal min wages has created massive destablization .
The Corporations and money players just want to have slave labor and child labor and take back the labor gains and environment protections that were gained in the USA ,as well as screw up the tax base that is generated by employed workers in the USA ,yet we are suppose to give them greater tax breaks ?
The USA population should just start refusing to do business with the big Monopolies and start doing business with local small business and local small farmers and ,if there are any left in the USA . Actually I think we should start with penalty taxes for any outsourcing ,or out manufacturing ,and taking a wage from these shores .
Unless you had Universal and uniform wages in all Countries , as well as pollution standards ,your simply transfering dollars to the Corporations and the rich ,while slave and child labor is exploited
world wide while it erodes the tax base of any Country stupid enough to have other Countries producing their products . Its not as if the USA doesn’t have the natural resources to produce their own stuff as we did for decades and decades . I can understand
a Country needing some imports if they didn’t have the ability to
make the product .
Its suicide for a Country not to protect its job base and eventually there won’t be enough money tax wise to even feed the unemployed ,take care of intrastructure ,or anything that is needed for a Society to function on a higher level than a Nation with a bunch of poverty stricken people being the majority .
This is the data behind the data of a recent NY Times poll and I call BS. They seem to consider virtually all of the registered votes as being “likely voters” despite a 60% turn out in U.S. being very good. I will stick with Rasmussen.
We predict the 100% probability that Obamney will be (re)elected this year.
And what will remain unchanged after he is?
War in Afghanistan - check
Drone wars everywhere - check
TSA groping everyone - check
National Defense Authorization Act - check
PATRIOT Act - check
Wall Street owning Congress - check
Now back to your regularly scheduled Gays, Guns & God program…
There are 2 trustworthy pollsters. Rasmussen and Gallup. They both have a daily tracking poll and the breakdown along partisan lines is in line with actual voter turnout samples from recent elections. Both of them show a race tied at around 45/45. In general an incumbent polling below 50 loses.
Then you have NYT polls with D+15 samples that show - surprise, surprise a big Obama win. In 2008 at the height of Obama Mania, the turnout was D+8. In 2010 the turnout was even.
And yet laughably, the NYT expects 2012 to be D+15? Ohhhh-kay.
You should ignore polls that treat the electorate as a single entity. 45/45 doesn’t matter. 50/48 wouldn’t matter. 48/52 either.
The election isn’t one contest. It is 50 contests. If you aren’t looking at an electoral college analysis and polls for the swing states, you aren’t looking at a serious poll. I guarantee that the campaigns aren’t wasting their time with a poll that looks at the country as a whole.
Rasmussen does that very well. But remember Al Gore lost the electoral vote but won the popular vote. Republicans do better in the electoral vote than the popular vote since they win more low population states which still have two senators and thus get those two votes.
Romney might have his “avalanche” in hard core red states, winning them by huge majorities, while Obama might win the majority of electoral votes by small margins.
He promised change. He delivered. 110 million Americans are now on welfare. All part of the Democrat plan for a permanent dependent class.
The data come “from the U.S. Census’s Survey of Income and Program Participation shows that nearly 110,000 million individuals received a welfare benefit in 2011. (These figures do not include other means-tested benefits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit or the health insurance premium subsidies included in the President’s health care law. CBO estimates that the premium subsidies, scheduled to begin in 2014, will cover at least 25 million individuals by the end of the decade.)”
This is not just Americans, however. “These figures include not only citizens, but non-citizens as well,” according to the committee.
obama is still trying to correct the damage done under Bush.
Just Bush? You think too small. Obama inherited a structurally damaged economy due to 30 years of TrickleDownRichTakeAll/Offshoring wealth re-distribution.
4 years later - things are even worse.
And won’t get better until the wealth redistribution reverses. Will the Democrats address this? Maybe. Will Republicans? Never.
Hottest July nationwide since records have been kept.
Anyone still bold (or deluded) enough to call Global Warming an Al Gore nutcase conspiracy?
The Earth is the ultimate “house” of humanity. How is the health of the world’s McMansion?
Look at peak oil and peak consumption, and the burning of coal for electricity. The real answer is to reduce world population immediately by 2 billion and force austerity worldwide of greenhouse gas emissions to avoid global collapse in 75 years. Any volunteers?
But no worries. We’ll nuke each other long before then.
I think if you look at the global temeratures for the year you do not see anything special. South Africa just had snow for the first time since 1968. I do not argue that the Earth has warmed. The question is whether it is primarily man-made. Since 1998, we have put more CO2 in the air than we predicted at the time. However, we have not seen any global warming. The models predicted 1 degree per decade. Has not happened. So why should I believe that the warming is man-made. I do believe that a small per cent is man made but not anywhere need the proponents of man made warming
But you still need the cold air and they are exeptionally cold. No I see it more and more the proponents are sounding more like the skeptics. When we still had real global warming, the skeptics to the warming itself would point to one area of the globe that was cool. Now, that true global warming has stopped the proponents will point to one area to say there global warming. After katrina we were told there global warming means more hurricanes now that we don’t see many that prediction is ignored.
If you take an iron turn it on and heat it up and then turn it off. If you plot the temperatures by seconds, you will find that some of the hottest temperatures on the graph occur after the iron is shutoff. After the highest sun spot number is 8000 years over the the last 50 years we are beginning to decline combine that with the PDO switching from warm to cold, I think some people are desperate to get the taxes in place before they can no longer hide the cooling.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pete
2012-08-08 16:34:32
“But you still need the cold air and they are exeptionally cold.”
That is another symptom of climate change. Mother Nature overcorrects in an attempt to find equilibrium. Like housing prices. It results in more extreme weather which means some places will receive record cold, others record heat. Droughts and flooding both become more common, depending on the area.
Comment by ecofeco
2012-08-08 16:48:45
Pete gets it.
Now for some big words. (Ask your parent if you need help)
Asymmetric oscillation of a disturbed unstable dynamic system
Then using that logic, coldest January ever equals proof of global cooling. Right?
“Mind-boggling, historic cold has gripped the Last Frontier in recent weeks. Nome, Galena, and Bettles - in Alaska’s west and west interior - are all likely to have their coldest Januarys on record the National Weather Service reported today. It will likely be the 5th coldest January on record in Fairbanks, with a hard-to-imagine average temperature of -26.7. Anchorage is likely to log its 4th coldest January.”
Or how about the coldest February?
“February 10, 2012 – ROMANIA – Europe’s record freezing temperatures have claimed hundreds of lives, snarled traffic and trapped tens of thousands of residents in remote villages across Serbia and Romania. In this instance this big blocking of cold air . . . seemed to influence the way the winds behaved rather than the other way around,” he said. “We didn’t expect the cold block to become so persistent and then move westward.”
Or how about the coldest June?
“Vancouverites may love to complain about their “bummer summer,” but it’s not just casual griping any more. Current temperatures are on track to make this June the coldest on record. As of Wednesday, this month’s mean temperature — an average of the coldest and warmest temperatures each day — was 13.2 C. That’s a substantial drop from 2011’s mean temperature of 15.3 degrees.”
Or coldest May?
“Snow made an unwelcome appearance in Teesdale, County Durham, today as the cold weather was predicted to continue into next months with May forcecast to be the coldest for 100 years. The mercury dropped to around -2c (28f) overnight yesterday on high ground, although most of the snow had melted by late afternoon as temperatures rose to 7c (45f).”
The only thing of value I see there is the notion of solar activity decreasing. If so, great! But the huge list of record-setting cold/snow episodes from ‘11 and ‘12 that the author cites only hurt his case, as those are a product of an unstable atmosphere.
He writes, “Global temperatures increased for twenty years from the late 1970s to the late 1990s but have either stopped warming or have begun to cool in the last fifteen years”. OK, which is it? If it’s based on official measurements, there is no room for debate whether it “stopped warming” or “began to cool”. It’s one or the other. Or perhaps one other option he didn’t mention.
The cure for global warming of course is Marxism. You know, the only kind where 95% of the people are slaves to the state. The other 5% are the high priests.
And by the way, with 7,035,371 owner-occupied housing units in California, one in 135 in foreclosure implies there will be north of 50,000 foreclosure homes for the California market to work through in the next few years on top of normal supply plus new home construction. Sounds like there is no reason for prospective buyers to hurry up and buy now, as plenty more homes will be coming on to the market over the next few years.
For sale signs are posted on a foreclosed house in Glendale, California. Foreclosures in the state are falling, but it still had the worst rate in July.
…from the July 2012 foreclosure report that Irvine-based RealtyTrac just released…, California had the country’s highest foreclosure rate in July, with “one in every 325″ homes at risk of reverting to bank ownership.
…
Meanwhile, at the municipal level, California sports the top four cities for foreclosures, with Stockton — now bankrupt — topping the list, with one in every 135 homes in foreclosure. Vallejo-Fairfield, Riverside- [also bankrupt] San Bernardino-Ontario, and Modesto follow Stockton. Then in come Palm Bay-Melbourbe-Titusville and Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater (numbers five and nine, respectively) in Florida to break up a sweep of the top ten by California’s beleaguered cities.
…
a) Lenders continue to foreclose on deadbeat borrowers (thus continue to have high foreclosure rates), and steadily decrease non-current loan numbers; or
b) Have lenders slow-play the problem, like in Florida, Nevada, New York and New Jersey, thus having lower foreclosure numbers, but high and stagnant numbers of non-current loans?
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The regulator for government-seized mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Wednesday warned against the use of so-called eminent domain to restructure mortgages.
San Bernardino County has proposed using such powers to seize distressed mortgages at a discount and then refinance them for struggling homeowners. Chicago officials also are considering the idea, according to reports. Although mortgage rates are near record lows, underwater homeowners are essentially blocked from refinancing their loans.
According to CoreLogic, some 11.4 million, or 23.7%, of all residential properties with a mortgage are “underwater” or “upside down” — meaning that borrowers owe more on their mortgage than their homes are worth. There are federal programs to aid such borrowers, but so far they are only available to a small segment of those mortgage holders.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency made clear its opposition to the use of eminent domain for fixing mortgages. “As conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and regulator of 12 Federal Home Loan Banks, FHFA has significant concerns about the use of eminent domain to revise existing financial contracts and the alteration of the value of the companies’ securities holdings,” the agency said in a statement.
“FHFA has determined that action may be necessary on its part to avoid a risk to safe and sound operations at its regulated entities and to avoid taxpayer expense. Additionally, FHFA has concerns that such programs could negatively affect the extension of credit to borrowers seeking to become homeowners and on investors that support the housing market,” it added.
Lobbyists for banks and securities firms such as the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association have made similar points. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was cool to the idea when asked at a congressional hearing last month.
…
Even with this former obama economic adviser supporting every liberal/socialist program out there - even he does not think it is going to bring housing back.
So then - WHY DO IT?
—————————————–
Housing Market’s ‘Go-Go Days’ Are a Thing of the Past
David Chalian - Daily Ticker – August 8, 2012
The sluggish economic recovery would certainly get a short-term boost if the housing market picked up a bit of steam, but any notion that a boom in housing alone will be the key to a fully recovered American economy should be eradicated according to former Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee.
“When housing comes back, and I think in many if not most markets in the U.S. we have reached a bottom and you’ve started to see the prices recovering. But when they come back, it’s probably not going to be back to the Go-Go days,” Goolsbee told The Daily Ticker. “It’s just unrealistic. We’ve got 5 million vacant homes in the country and so the thought that we’re going to get substantial construction building more homes, I think it’s going to be several years before that happens, though we might see some relief with the prices starting to go up modestly.”
Goolsbee, who currently serves as a professor at the University of Chicago, also weighed in on a controversial policy proposal getting some attention and consideration by local officials across the country including Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
Mortgage Resolution Partners, a San Francisco-based company, has put forth a proposal where local governments would use eminent domain authority to take ownership of underwater mortgages.
It’s not clear if that would be a legal use of eminent domain, but Goolsbee said it is worth consideration.
“That kind of thing hasn’t been tried before. I’d advise anybody to look at this. In most of these housing policies when you actually sit down and look at the details a lot of them are hard to put into practice. If you are weighing in with eminent domain, I think you just got to be careful about what the spillover effects are going to be on other parts of the housing industry. But we know there $750 billion of negative equity out in the housing market and that’s a huge issue. These people who have debt overhang are not increasing their consumption. They are going to have a hard time coming back while they’re under all that debt.”
Goolsbee also expressed dissatisfaction with FHFA acting director Ed DeMarco’s continued opposition to writing down the principals for underwater homeowners.
“It’s on a strictly business decision they ought to be evaluating whether they can keep more people in their homes and get more payments out of them by writing down their principals somewhat so that they don’t default,” he said. “I find it a little frustrating that the head of Fannie and Freddie is not wanting to think anything other than let’s just hold on to these vacant homes and hopefully the prices will and let’s not consider any of these kind of alternative payment options.”
But forget that, I heard that some union teachers in a city far away from where I live actually make good money and get nice pensions when they retire.
Let’s compare those salaries to CEO pay in America for similarly sized organizations. You know the ones who hand pick their compensation committees and have massive golden parachutes.
Information on 500 of America’s largest companies, income, tax rate, CEO compensation. NerdWallet
ft dot com
August 8, 2012 6:46 pm
Americans need to face the harsh truth and pay more tax
By Jared Bernstein
One of the guiding principles of contemporary tax policy in the US is the notion that Americans are terribly overtaxed. Both candidates are running on not raising taxes for the middle classes and Mitt Romney wants to not only make the George W. Bush tax cuts permanent, he wants to cut income tax rates another 20 per cent across the board.
Yet, data from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reveal that, when it comes to federal taxation, US households are less taxed now than 30 years ago, and that is not just a function of the recession. The CBO data began in 1979 when the typical, or median, household paid 19 per cent of their income in federal taxes. In 2009, that share had fallen to 11 per cent.
Both economic and policy changes account for the decline in “effective tax rates”. In recessions, progressive tax systems provide automatic tax cuts as declining incomes push households into lower tax brackets. Middle-income households lost an average $6,000 in market-based income, an 11 per cent decline, between 2007 and 2009, but their federal tax bill fell $2,300, or 24 per cent. Thus their effective tax rate fell from 14 per cent to 11 per cent.
But policy changes also played a significant role and the Bush tax cuts have had a large impact on the fall of tax rates ever since. Over the 1980s and 1990s, the overall effective tax rate fluctuated within a narrow band of 20.2 per cent to 22.7 per cent – lower in the Ronald Reagan years, a bit higher in the Bill Clinton years. But from 2000-07, before the recession took hold, they fell by almost 3 percentage points, equal to about $300bn in revenue, or 2 per cent of gross domestic product.
Policy changes lowered taxes in the recession, too. That’s a perfectly legitimate use of tax cuts, but such cuts are supposed to be temporary and reset once the downturn has passed. Yet, every time a tax cut nears expiration, the deafening cry of “tax increase!” frightens politicians such that today’s tax policy is solidly asymmetric: rates can only go down. That makes it impossible to get on a sane fiscal path.
For Republicans who have signed the Grover Norquist pledge to never raise taxes, the misleading mantra that we are overtaxed serves two purposes. First, the wealthiest households get the biggest income boost from any across-the-board cuts.
…
Why buy stocks now when a fall 2012 crash most likely will wipe out all your gains?
Aug. 9, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EDT Stock stall, higher rates ahead?
Commentary: Bull and bear think bond boom busted
By Peter Brimelow, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Two turn-calling letters disagree on stocks — but expect higher interest rates.
…
octogenarian veteran Richard Russell’s worrying, in his Dow Theory Letters comment posted after the market close Wednesday, about the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s (DJIA +0.05%) persistent refusal to close above its May peak of 13,279.32.
Coupled with deterioration in the Dow Jones Transportation Average (DJT -0.33%), this causes Russell to suspect an imminent Dow theory sell signal.
He writes: “My conclusion is that the stock market is discounting ahead, discounting something it doesn’t like in the future, which is probably four to six months ahead.
“What could it be? If I had to guess — I’d guess it was consumers suddenly cutting back on their buying. I say this because I don’t get the perception that U.S. consumers have taken the business situation seriously — yet.
“They’ve been hypnotized by the optimistic quarterly earnings of stocks. Europe is in recession, and they will be cutting back on imports — this will hit the earnings of America’s blue chips.
“The bad news will probably hit in the fall. The news will shock and surprise America’s consumers.”
…
Like I said the other day, it`s Spring Training in South Florida for tougher gun laws.
Posted: 11:02 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2012
Man charged with attempted murder after knife attack on cab driver in Boynton Beach
By Julius Whigham II
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
BOYNTON BEACH —
A 31-year-old man was arrested Wednesday night after he allegedly attacked a cab driver with a knife while trying to rob him, city police said.
Gregory Neider is facing charges of attempted felony murder and attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, said Stephanie Slater, city police spokeswoman.
The driver, Marcellin Augustin, 56, remained in stable condition at Delray Medical Center late Wednesday, she said. The cuts to his head were deep enough to expose part of his skull, reports said.
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
Up way too early again. Long story as to why.
All I can say is this: I’m glad there’s an HBB. What a rollicking ride it’s been for, oh, the last six years. So happy to have found this party back in the spring of 2006.
Sometimes, while waiting for the world to come to its senses, I feel like Linus in the pumpkin patch waiting for the great pumpkin.
i feel more like sally.
Yeah, Linus had faith that the Great Pumpkin would come. I am trying to still believe that sanity will eventually return.
“Yeah, Linus had faith that the Great Pumpkin would come.”
Meanwhile, World War I Flying Ace Snoopy, in full uniform, climbs aboard his trusty Sopwith Camel (his doghouse), to engage his old nemesis the Red Baron in battle. After a fierce fire-fight which forces Snoopy to ditch his plane behind enemy lines, he crawls his way across the countryside, briefly showing up at Violet’s Halloween party, and then goes to the pumpkin patch to make mischief. One very cool scene occurs when Linus sees Snoopy’s ominous shadow rising from among the pumpkins, believing it’s the Great Pumpkin finally finding his pumpkin patch “worthy,” and then proceeding to faint. When Sally discovers that it’s only the mischievous Snoopy, she regrets missing “tricks-or-treats” and the Halloween party, and threatens to sue Linus for ruining her fun.
As Sally joins the other kids to make the best of what’s left of Halloween, Linus is still convinced that the Great Pumpkin will show up, and vows that he will put in a good word for the gang–accidentally saying if the Great Pumpkin comes, instead of when. When he realized his great faux pas, he exclaims that he is doomed and that even one mistake can cause the Great Pumpkin to pass him by.
Charlie Brown here, with Lucy holding that damned, seductive football.
Central bank cargo cult members worldwide must feel likewise.
Central Bank Talk Continues to Spur Markets
Wednesday, August 08, 2012
Global stocks continued to rise throughout yesterday and overnight in Asian trading as speculation continues to mount that the European Central Bank and the U.S. Federal Reserve will announce monetary stimulus measures to boost their respective recoveries.
Asian markets saw Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index increase 0.24%, Australia’s S&P/ASX200 gain 0.70%, whilst Japan’s Nikkei 225 Index was up 0.96. The rise for the 3rd consecutive day comes as speculation the central bank of China will cut the reserve requirement for lenders or lower interest rates as the world’s second-largest economy slows. A government report tomorrow may show Chinese consumer prices increased 1.7 percent in July from a year earlier, the least since January 2010. Japan’s 10-year yields increased three basis points to 0.81 percent, the highest since July 5.
A sluggish recovery in the U.S. will likely prompt action from the Fed Reserve there and investors, helped by hints by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, are expecting the Federal Reserve will stimulate the U.S. economy via buying Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities from banks. Unemployment has continued to hover around the 8.2% mark for some time and Fed bond purchases, known as quantitative easing, weaken the dollar and keep interest rates low to aid recovery, a combination that makes stocks an attractive investment. The US 30 index closed 0.39% higher yesterday whilst the USD made small gains against most major currencies as a sell off of commodities helped the USD’s ascent. The largest swing overnight for the greenback was against the commodity linked AUD; up 0.16%.
Increasing expectations that the ECB will implement a debt buying scheme for distressed nations such as Spain, Greece and possibly Italy continued to fuel a risk-on trading sentiment that sparked strong demand for stocks. The FTSE closed 0.56% higher, whilst Germany’s DAX finished 0.71% higher. The EUR/USD was down 0.10% at time of writing.
…
“I feel like Linus in the pumpkin patch waiting for the great pumpkin.”
If the Great Pumpkin does show up, will you put in a good word for the gang?
I’m just getting a little worried that the world will run out of popcorn before it collapses.
Neil ran out of popcorn three years ago.
has he been gone that long?
time flies.
Miss him and the popcorn.
I feel like the Titanic has sailed and we all know that there a limited number of life rafts. Let’s hope that there is no room for banker’s and those on Wall street.
Instead of “woman and children” first it will be “bankers and politicians” that get the life boats.
No banker left behind!
They get first dibs.
And you can take that to the Bank…
But ,Bankers and Wall Street are the ones being saved and bailed out and Main Street is already drowning .
The DC tax appeals board might be corrupt and artificially lowering property assessment values for rich developers? You don’t say?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/surge-in-dc-tax-office-settlements-reduces-commercial-property-owners-bills/2012/08/07/5af75372-d1c4-11e1-8bea-6dc0b4879aab_story.html?hpid=z1
The $2.6 billion in property value reductions is more than eight times the total from 2011, when the tax office agreed to 164 settlements for a total reduction of $305 million, city records show. In 2010, there were 11 settlements with a total reduction of $43 million. In 2009, there were 35 settlements with $83 million in reductions.
The settlements have raised concerns among some employees in the tax office, where three years ago manager Harriette Walters was sentenced to federal prison for stealing more than $48 million through fraudulent tax returns, the largest embezzlement scheme in city history.
The settlement process largely played out behind closed doors. Tax office officials said supervisors are authorized to significantly adjust property values without approval from higher-ups. The Post reviewed the publicly available settlement records for more than 40 cases and found only brief explanations for even the steepest reductions, which often occurred after staff appraisers provided written accounts supporting higher values.
“They’re just giving it away,” said one veteran city appraiser who for fear of termination declined to be identified. “It’s demoralizing because we are doing our jobs and then they change our assessments. Values are being undercut so much.”
Developers of buildings that settled with the city include longtime builder Douglas Jemal, whose company received a $25 million reduction for 12 properties in Northeast, city records show. The 53 percent reduction, signed in March by George, the chief appraiser, lowered the company’s property tax bill this year by an estimated $460,000.
A $58 million reduction went to Gallery Place, the office and retail building in the heart of Chinatown. The building was built by two of the city’s most influential developers, Herb Miller and John E. “Chip” Akridge III.
Gallery Place is next to Verizon Center, home to the National Basketball Association’s Washington Wizards and the National Hockey League’s Washington Capitals.
George signed off on a settlement that dropped the building’s taxable value to $181 million, a 24 percent reduction. The decision reduced the building’s tax bill by about $1 million. No explanation was listed on the settlement form.
Damn those public worker unions for bankrupting their local government!
Oh wait…
From the SEIU website:
Although it varies based on sector and occupation, the union difference for workers across the board is undeniable.For workers employed in the public sector:
The difference in salary amounts to roughly $165 more a week–approximately $650 more a month–for union vs. non-union.
For workers employed in the private sector:
The salary difference for union vs. non-union amounts to roughly $155 more a week–approximately $615 more a month.
You’re right. For once.
“You’re right. For once.”
And I am glad he is.
I’ve worked union and I’ve worked non-union.
Union is better.
Better for you. Worse for the tax payer. The gravy train is almost off the rails. WI was the first of many. The day unions are finally eradicated will be a great day in this country.
Yes a great day where there will be no safety regulation and workers will loose limbs and die with no recourse. There will be a continued downward spiral in wages and a shrinking middle class we will more and more resemble third world countries, power will be entrenched and the only way up will be nepotism or fealty. As big business and the elite will control our gov with no competition we will see entrepreneurs loose their inventions and small businesses get crushed by the large oligopolies and monopolies and the owners will be pushed back down into the lower caste to which he or she belongs. We will see the destruction of Medicare and Social Security and a return to real hunger and of course the rise in crime and social unrest that follows. Taxes actually won’t be lower for most as the elite will continue to tax themselves at less than 10% while everyone else will be paying more via VAT taxes gas taxes user fees and of course the biggest tax of all unemployment.
“Better for you.”
That would be me.
“Worse for the tax payer.”
That also would be me.
“The day unions are finally eradicated will be a great day in this country.”
There are reasons unions sprung into existence in the first place. Unfortunatley those reasons are still with us, and as long as these reasons are still with us some workers (but not all workers) will need some sort of a union to serve as an offset.
There is a HUGE difference in private and public unions.
There is a HUGE difference in “right to work” states and “closed shops” states.
On the relative scale.
Private unions in “right to work” states are good.
Public unions in “closed shops” states are leeches bankrupting all they touch.
I can agree to and favor a right-to-work state with strong employee rights laws.
Closed shop states honestly do not offer choices, even between unions.
It’s all about rules and rights. If the employer gets to set all the rules then the worker’s rights (if there are any) are at the whim of the employer.
There has to be a limit put on the employer in the form of a balanced set of rules that will restrain the employer from acting on whatever whim that may happen to overtake him/her at any given time. If these rules are not forced on the employer from without then they need to be forced on him/her from within. Hence the need for unions.
I agree with 2fruit…I do not believe there should be unions in government jobs…
“Yes a great day where there will be no safety regulation and workers will loose limbs and die with no recourse. There will be a continued downward spiral in wages and a shrinking middle class we will more and more resemble third world countries, power will be entrenched and the only way up will be nepotism or fealty.”
But just think how much richer the banksters and other 1%ers would be!
$2.6 BILLION in tax breaks, in just that ONE city is more than the budget of any but the top 5 cities in this nation. Heck, that’s more than the budget of some STATES.
Unions are a flea on that camel’s back. They are ALSO taxpayers.
PUBLIC union pension liabilities alone are in the TRILLIONS of dollars.
Guess who is on the hook for that? Homeowners.
THAT is one BIG FLEA.
$2.6 BILLION in tax breaks, in just that ONE city is more than the budget of any but the top 5 cities in this nation. Heck, that’s more than the budget of some STATES.
“Unions are a flea on that camel’s back. They are ALSO taxpayers.”
LOL. Union thugs are tax payers, but CEOs aren’t. Got it.
PS: Did you know eeeevil oil companies pay tens of billions in taxes every year?
There are no pension liabilities, only obligations that the government, JUST LIKE PRIVATE BUSINESSES, wants to renege on.
So a contract is contract until it becomes inconvenient, unless you’re a poor person, then you’re a deadbeat, right?
And you wonder why you don’t get any respect?
…and receive billions in tax breaks.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/29/news/la-pn-senate-blocks-proposed-end-to-oil-company-tax-breaks-20120329
March 29, 2012|By Lisa Mascaro and Christi Parsons
Washington — An attempt to roll back oil company tax breaks was blocked in the Senate, despite a Rose Garden push by President Obama, who said the big five oil companies are doing “just fine” as consumers struggle with painfully high gas prices at the pump.
Republicans led opposition to the measure, but several Democrats from oil-rich states joined the GOP in a filibuster to prevent the legislation from advancing. The vote was 51-47, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold.
The legislation would end more than $2 billion in annual tax subsidies to the so-called big five oil companies — BP, Chevron, Exxon, Shell and Conoco-Phillips.
“So a contract is contract until it becomes inconvenient..?”
I usually agree with you, but I would like to say that I didn’t agree to $250k salaries for retired firefighters, nor any of the other nonsense that has taken place. Why am I paying my hard-earned money so those guys can live a life of luxury due to corrupt negotiations which I was never even allowed a voice? I am not anti-union, but these “contracts” are for the birds.
The fundamental problem is that “collective bargaining” when a private union, is private union vs. company. Company executives are absolutely looking out for the bottom line of the company (most have equity in the company), and the private union is looking out for the bottom line of the employees. A good negotiation.
“Collective bargaining” with a public union, is the public union vs. someone who doesn’t have the same interests as a company (or the same rules–like properly accounting for pension liabilities).
So, you end up with very nice pensions. And even when a Dem Governor (J Brown) in a Dem controlled state (CA) puts forth pension reform (as weak as it was), it goes nowhere.
“Guess who is on the hook for that? Homeowners.”
Good thing they have all that real estate equity saved up.
Oh wait…
This is nothing new. Local governments always pander to the richest folks in the city. They always get special permits, fee reductions, rezonings, and tax exemptions and reductions.
The people in the government fear the loss of business when they threaten to pull their companies and move out of town. Conversely, how many times have you witnessed your local town council meeting with a “big” company that has “plans” to come to town with 500 new jobs. Will they come here? Yes, under the following conditions: TAX BREAKS FOR 10 years or more. RE-zoning the land.
Elimination of a large portion of fees and permits, etc, etc, etc.
The politicians feel compelled to make concessions so they can say that they were instrumental in bringing>>xyz corp. to town and more good paying jobs. Hooray!
Here in Tampa, I am paying for the SECOND NFL stadium, as the first, built some 20 years before the second was deemed not fancy and new enough to keep the Buccaneers here in town. To do this Public for Private business financing they create a “sports authority” which has similar powers and responsibilities to a Port Authority.
It’s all a scam to provide public funding for very rich owners who promise the City will benefit greatly from having XXXX in their town.
I’ve never seen it. Only an “economist” can come up with a model, whereby giving a milllionaire the exclusive rights to a Stadium paid for by $300 million dollars of public funds is better than building 300 Million-dollar office buildings (or 600 half-million dollars ones) and providing them to “other” business operators.
Which would really have the greater “economic impact”>?? 500 new middle size businesses, rent-free, or one football team??
Corruption is part of the American business model.
“This is nothing new. Local governments always pander to the richest folks in the city.”
I agree 100%.
Salaries for the 10 largest unions’ bosses range from $173,000 for the United Auto Workers’ Bob King to $618,000 for Terence O’Sullivan, the president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka makes about $283,000 per year. Gerald McEntee, the president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), makes $480,000. The AFSCME stands to lose the most from any of the governors’ budget victories, as it’s currently the nation’s powerhouse public sector union, with around 1.5 million members nationwide.
Let’s compare those salaries to CEO pay in America for similarly sized organizations. You know the ones who hand pick their compensation committees and have massive golden parachutes.
I don’t think the unions publicize how many they employ in their organizations. They just publish the membership numbers.
If a private corporation wants to pay its CEO a gazillion dollars a year, what business is it of yours?
On the other hand if the head of a public union pays its head goon $600K, it is my business as a tax payer.
Surely you can see the difference.
If a private corporation wants to pay its CEO a gazillion dollars a year, what business is it of yours?
As a shareholder it’s most definitely my business, but as a shareholder I have no say whatsoever in the lotto jackpot sized salaries CEOs get these days. That’s up to the crony filled boards of directors.
“As a shareholder it’s most definitely my business, but as a shareholder I have no say whatsoever in the lotto jackpot sized salaries CEOs get these days. That’s up to the crony filled boards of directors.”
Fine, then sell your shares. Unfortunately as a tax payer I don’t have the option to sell my share of the taxes i have to pay in order for union bosses to earn $600K a year.
Do you really not see the difference?
Reading comprehension is not your forte, is it?
Did you NOT just read that the PRIVATE business used PUBLIC money to build a $300 MILLION facility that only it has control over?
Your math isn’t so good either. 600K is greater than 300 MILLION?
Truly, you are a troll.
“If a private corporation wants to pay its CEO a gazillion dollars a year, what business is it of yours?”
If the corporation is a bank, there is a fairly good chance the money was either taken from taxpayers in the form of bailouts or from unwitting customers in the form of some kind of quasi-legal fraud.
“…troll.”
You have to give Eddie for stimulating a lot of posts — way more than the recent average until he showed up again.
Never mind the majority of the additional posts were his own…
Wow, now Smithers is a troll? Is this forum becoming intolerant of other viewpoints? He’s not extreme, and yet there is a whole mob of you who jump on him every day with personal attacks.
The CEO’s of all major Corporations make millions per year ,and Hank Paulson as a high ranking CEO of a division of Goldmans made more than a half a billion in 5 years at this post as a Wall Street leverage money player .The damage and harm that these high paid thieves did to the entire USA and World was evil .
Mr Smithers ,you want me to get worked up over a high ranking Union man making 283 thousand a year . You must be joking me . The fact that many States can’t meet their budgets can be directly tied to the destruction that was caused by Wall Street and the Banks .You forget who created the shortfalls to begin with and the fake low interest rates and all the bail outs . The fact that they want you to look at public workers and blame them ,or look at people on Social Security and blame them ,or look at some homeless broke person and blame them is all part of take the eye off the Culprits and the ones that benefited from the crime spree that should give the money back ,as well as go to jail .
More like the jobs that were outsourced. How much money did states lose to China and India on income tax alone? Enough to pay these pensions?
Yes ,I forgot to include Corporations as the culprits also in the gutting of the American work force .
“Yes ,I forgot to include Corporations as the culprits also in the gutting of the American work force .”
And who did those American workers, work for in the first place? I’ll give you a few moments to think about it. Time’s up. Answer is corporations.
Those corporations decided to go elsewhere because of the insane regulations and taxation levels adopted in this country. Corporations didn’t gut anything. They simply relocated production to a more hospitable environment. You want those jobs back, easy solution. Make the US a business friendly environment and they’ll come right back.
The Corporations went to other Countries because they were allowed to without the proper penalty being put on them for taking jobs and the tax base outside of America .
They simply got into the lobby game with crooked Politicans that sold out the USA .
Also proper tariffs were not put on Foreign Countries trade wise ,no doubt more bribes to the Politicians .
You can’t bring back the business when Americans have to compete with 75cent a hour workers in other countries ,The only thing you can do to bring back business is penalize the Corporations in a penalty tax ,or treat them like a foreign corporation ,because their workforce is foreign .
Let them all go to foreign Countries and we can block their products or put a big tariff on them and than we can re-build business here again with smaller entities . let them all become foreign dealers because they aren’t our Corporations anymore . Let them try to sell their shit to
people who make 75 cents a hour .
“Mr Smithers ,you want me to get worked up over a high ranking Union man making 283 thousand a year . You must be joking me .”
Don’t sweat it, Wiz. It’s clear that EddieTard is a paid troll who cooks up strawmen here to take attention off high-level crime and corruption.
“And who did those American workers, work for in the first place?”
1. The military industrial complex?
2. The real estate industrial complex?
AUGUST 7, 2012, 3:18 P.M. ET.
For Unpaid College Loans, Feds Dock Social Security
More retirees are falling behind on student debt, and Uncle Sam is coming after their benefits.
By ANNAMARIA ANDRIOTIS
It’s no secret that falling behind on student loan payments can squash a borrower’s hopes of building savings, buying a home or even finding work. Now, thousands of retirees are learning that defaulting on student-debt can threaten something that used to be untouchable: their Social Security benefits.
According to government data, compiled by the Treasury Department at the request of SmartMoney.com, the federal government is withholding money from a rapidly growing number of Social Security recipients who have fallen behind on federal student loans. From January through August 6, the government reduced the size of roughly 115,000 retirees’ Social Security checks on those grounds. That’s nearly double the pace of the department’s enforcement in 2011; it’s up from around 60,000 cases in all of 2007 and just 6 cases in 2000.
Roughly 2.2 million student-loan debtors were 60 and older during the first quarter of 2012, and nearly 10% of their loans were 90 days or more past due, up from 6% during the first quarter of 2005, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “It’s really a unique problem we haven’t had to face before, and it’s only going to grow,” says Robert Applebaum, founder of Student Debt Crisis, a nonprofit advocacy group in Staten Island, N.Y.
The government’s withholding power also extends to Social Security disability benefits. Tammy Brown of Redding, Calif. says that the government has been taking $179 out of her Social Security disability check each month for the past five years. Brown, 52, became disabled in 1986 after being involved in a car accident. Unable to work, she fell behind on her student loan payments. She says the Social Security check is now too small to cover her food and medical bills, so she quit taking prescription pain pills. “It’s kind of hard to live on this amount of money,” she says.
Attorneys who specialize in defending debtors have seen a sea change as the government has stepped up its enforcement. For most of the last four years, Joshua Cohen, an attorney in Rocky Hill, Conn., has represented clients in their dealings with banks and collection agencies. It was only in the past year, Cohen says, that he started getting a growing number of calls from retirees. Now, Cohen says, “I’m getting calls from all over the country from people desperate for help.”
Compared to present-day retirees, younger generations are in deeper debt, which means stories of Social Security garnishment could become more commonplace when they enter retirement. Borrowers in their 20s and 30s owe roughly $600 billion, according to the New York Fed. They’re also leaving college with more debt than their predecessors: Sixty-six percent graduated this spring with debt, and their student loans averaging $28,720, up from $9,320 in 1993, according to FinAid.org. “It’s entirely possible that the way student loan debt is growing, this could get worse,” says Rich Williams, higher education advocate at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a nonprofit consumer group.
http://www.smartmoney.com/borrow/student-loans/grandmas-new-financial-problem-college-debt-1344292084111/?link=SM_hp_ls4e - 111k
No dollar, FB or otherwise, shall be allowed to escape.
Millions going deeply into debt to go to school just before retirement? Suggests that retirement was not really what those millions planned.
not really what those millions planned
But the big lie sold to middle age worker bees laid off from obsolete industries was “go back to school” and retrain for the hot jobs of the future!
well, of course it’s stupid for middle-aged people to “go back to school” for some supposed training to make them more hireable.
Unless it’s a short term trade school that teaches A/c maintenance or a six-month course in some specialty wherein there is a shortage of workers.
Unfortunately, the GOVERNMENT offers these loans to people who really shouldn’t be getting them. Yes, that’s right, and OBAMA wanted the government to CONTROL all the lending, because, well, the mean, ugly, nasty, bankers and lenders wouldn’t give loans to people who had little probability of paying them back, so the GOVERNMENT went in to “Fix it”.
All Hail Obama!!
I suspect, he will pass an executive order relinquishing all debts come election time if his polling is a little light, so this should be no problem to the debtors, but probably only to those who are under say 30 years old, i.e. young voters. The SS deductions help create greater “re-distribution”.
OBAMA wanted the government to CONTROL all the lending, because, well, the mean, ugly, nasty, bankers and lenders wouldn’t give loans to people who had little probability of paying them back
That would be Lyndon Johnson, dear.
” Yes, that’s right, and OBAMA wanted the government to CONTROL all the lending, because, well, the mean, ugly, nasty, bankers and lenders wouldn’t give loans to people who had little probability of paying them back, so the GOVERNMENT went in to “Fix it”.”
This is a lie. There was no difference to the banks whether the borrowers paid student loans back or not because they were government guaranteed. They got paid no matter what. However, the private banks charged more for doing the origination (and whatever other fees they tacked on) than the government did. So much more, in fact, that they were willing to pay enormous kick backs to the financial aid offices in the colleges to become the default paperwork that the school would pass out to students. Even with the kickbacks, the fees were so profitable that they were making a mint on the backs of 18 year olds who didn’t know there even was another place (government direct) to get the money that charged much lower fees.
The real private loans - the ones that aren’t government guaranteed - require a co-signer or an income or both and they can’t be discharged in bankruptcy. The government has not gotten involved in this market.
Polly, aren’t these the loans that Obama moved back to the gov in the health care law?
I’m just glad that I placed a premium on paying those loans back BEFORE the nesting instinct kicked in.
What “these” are you talking about?
Government-backed student loans — the old Stafford stuff. My understanding was that the Bush Admin allowed private banks to originate and service the government loans. That’s how those banks were allowed to snow the financial aid offices with their own paperwork. Of course if the student defaulted, it was the gov on the hook.
Obama didn’t like that the banks got the juicy profits while the taxpayer got the losses, so he reversed that Bush position and added it to Obamacare — that half of Obamacare that passed by reconciliation .
The SS deductions help create greater “re-distribution”.
“Greater” implies that Obama has re-distributed wealth from rich to poor. (which is greatly needed) But on a Macro level, the only wealth redistribution under Obama was the continued wealth redistribution from the middle-class to the rich. So why spout mis-leading propaganda?
The USA has re-distributed wealth for 40 years but all I got was laid-off and this lousy T-Shirt
Yes, oxide, those are the loans that were taken away from the banks, the ones where they had the risk and obligations of an administrator and got the profits as if they were actually making the loans, but even more profit than if they were the real lenders because they took no losses.
The private loans are still private.
Sign at an Occupy rally:
“Our jobs went to China and all we got were lousy T-shirts”
The real private loans - the ones that aren’t government guaranteed - require a co-signer or an income or both and they can’t be discharged in bankruptcy.
If they aren’t government-guaranteed, then why shouldn’t they be dischargable in BK?
“Many of these retirees aren’t even in hock for their own educations. Consumer advocates say that in the majority of the cases they’ve seen, the borrowers went into debt later in life to help defray education costs for their children or other dependents. Harold Grodberg, an elder law attorney in Bayonne, N.J., says he’s worked with at least six clients in the past two years whose problems started with loans they signed up for to help pay for their grandchildren’s tuition.”
I wonder if any of those grandchildren occupied Wall Street?
if any of those grandchildren occupied Wall Street?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2046586/Occupy-Wall-Street-Shocking-photos-protester-defecating-POLICE-CAR.html
The picture you reference had nothing to do with the OWS protests. It’s either doctored or from an incident elsewhere.
The “81PCT” markings on the car indicate that it’s an 81st precinct car.
The 81st precinct is located in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn (http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/precincts/precinct_081.shtml), which was NOT policing the protests.
The site of the OWS protests is in New York’s 1st precinct, which, as can be seen in this photo (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_AeedZ8X-zY0/TOglwy9qjHI/AAAAAAAAGXk/XVTycaFrzmA/s1600/IMG_1741.JPG), are marked “1PCT”
Time to put this one to rest.
I thought it meant he ate a 1%er.
Never - EVER - co-sign for a student loan…
This goes for any loan.
Wow, I agree with both of you
Scary
Wow. Same here.
SNARP
A (interesting?) real estate investment strategy post:
I like the strategy of low housing cost leaving me fat stacks of cash to spend on traveling to cultural events. I believe it was Polly who prefers the opposite strategy, of extremely expensive housing in exchange for the DC area free culture buffet.
Whatever makes each of us happy, to each their own or whatever. However yesterday’s bits had a comment by az slim about an astronomy themed bar in Tucson. Tucson! I would have never guessed. I’ve been into astronomy and space exploration since I was a kid, but I’ve never heard of this bar until yesterdays bits. Because I’m not limited by high housing expenses, I can fly there just to visit a bar. Well it would be a lot more fun to visit during a launch or landing, than just any random day. And it needs to favorably intersect with the work/kids/school schedule that prevents me from doing “culture” for about 99% of my time. But I can certainly afford to do it, and probably will. Not this year (too much stuff already scheduled) maybe not even next year, but someday I will drink a beer at the astronomy bar while watching a launch or landing … and I’ll be paying the whole way in cash, because I can, because of where I live.
I think it is a somewhat superior strategy, at least for me, because “my culture” is (unfortunately?) all over the map. If I could live in one hyperexpensive city that hosted a CA makerfaire, a NYC Hope conference (2006 was a blast), a REAL N.O. cajun food restaurant, a Dayton hamvention, a TED conference (which I can (barely) afford but could never get the unobtainable tickets which is probably just as well), a Huntsville space museum (at least in the early 90s it was the coolest museum on the planet), az slim’s now world famous astronomy bar, a bike trail and a snow shoe trail in the north woods of Wisconsin, then I’d think, just think, about moving to that super-expensive super-city. At least some of what I’ve already done and some of what I wanna do probably appeal to some of you, but not all, my point being that as a group its probably not even theoretically possible for “a city” to appeal to everyone or even appeal to more than a tiny minority of people.
So that’s the long version of my investment strategy of putting money into planes / trains / automobiles instead of renting real estate from the bank. Inspired by az slims recent discovery of the astronomy bar. Tucson… who ever would have guessed?
Interesting that the concept of investment is a choice between blowing the money on overpriced housing or travel.
My housing costs are less than 20% of my gross income and that includes utilities.
For metro DC that is impressive. It’s easier to stay below that ratio in flyover (assuming a better than Lucky Ducky job). Less than 15% here, but more importantly haven’t mowed a lawn or shoveled snow in 7 years.
Mine are under 5% here in boat over country including utilities. Not for those with lots of rug rats to care for.
And by the way, we have two Air and Space museums in the DC area. I go to free lectures regularly at the DC based one (they have lecture series in the fall and spring) bringing in scientists deeply involved in exploration. I haven’t even been out to the public displays at Goddard (I bet there are bars near Goddard where you could hang out with other space enthusiasts). Smithsonian runs observation nights out in VA during new moons. The Carnegie Institute also brings in scientists for the Capital Science series throughout the year. Also free, though it covers all kinds of science. There is a group that runs science cafes in Alexandria every month - happy hour plus cheap appetizers followed by presentations and discussions.
Hamvention? Is that for ham radios? I’m sure there is a group here. You’d just have to google for it. One of the advantages of being in a place where there are a lot of people. You can find other people who are into the same stuff you are, no matter what that is. Is it better to go to a group gathering once every few years, or to a meeting with fewer people who share your interests once a month? People who could actually become your friends.
We certainly have plenty of bike trails. And bike clubs. And people who bike to work. And a lot of Metro stations have both regular racks and enclosed lockers that you can rent if you are going to bike to public transportation.
If you explain the other stuff you mention, I’ll find that for you here as well.
I don’t know about you, but I only get a few weeks of vacation a year and about a week of it (minimum) is needed for family obligations. I have no desire to live most of my life for the sake of a few weeks of vacation per year.
Uh-oh. Slim is going to have to take a trip to DC. The astronomy and bicycling scenes are way too tempting.
My floor is your floor, slim. With air mattress. Or the sofa. Friend who stopped by for a conference she had in the city said it was very comfy.
My floor is your floor, slim. With air mattress. Or the sofa. Friend who stopped by for a conference she had in the city said it was very comfy.
You’re on!
Hmmm, for my next trick, I’ll be looking at affordable airfares into Our Nation’s Capital. Do you recommend the BWI, then Amtrak into the District route? Dulles? Or National?
Hey you two, I want in.
BWI usually has the cheapest fares. Amtrak will get you to Union Station. On weekdays, you can also take a MARC train to Union Station. And there is a bus that will get you to the Greenbelt Metro Station (I think). Dulles is hard to get to/from by public transport, but it can be done by bus. National is very easy by public transporation (Metro goes right there), but usually has the most expensive fares.
Southwest goes to BWI.
Contact me off line for the sort of stuff you want to do so we can discuss timing. I like the Environmental Film Festival which is early March. Cherry Blossoms are lovely, but the city is very crowded. But I can find free and/or cheap stuff at all times of year. The play on Monday was free. If it doesn’t rain, the Marine Corps Band is playing a concert on the steps of the Capitol building tonight - I love Ralph Vaughan Williams. The National Youth Orchestra of Canada is at Strathmore tomorrow - free. I could keep going. The science lectures tend to go a little quiet during the summer, but they will all be back in the fall.
Contact me off line for the sort of stuff you want to do so we can discuss timing. I like the Environmental Film Festival which is early March.
I just sent you an e-mail, polly.
Oxide,
You don’t need space on my floor.
Find a way to contact Slim. She can forward your e-mail to my home e-mail. We can make this a threesome.
One limitation. I have promised to play hostess to my parents and godparents sometime in the spring. And that is going to involve actually escorting them around, not just pointing them at events and museums and going to work. Not sure when.
Find a way to contact Slim. She can forward your e-mail to my home e-mail. We can make this a threesome.
Hey, oxide, you can contact me via my website.
I want to see a pic of polly, oxide, and slim in DC.
My housing costs are 20% of our net income including taxes and utilities. We live in a nice development but in the smallest house in it (2000 sq ft). We also put 30% down 18 uears ago. We must have been suckers playing by the rules.
Whatever makes each of us happy, to each their own or whatever. However yesterday’s bits had a comment by az slim about an astronomy themed bar in Tucson. Tucson! I would have never guessed. I’ve been into astronomy and space exploration since I was a kid, but I’ve never heard of this bar until yesterdays bits. Because I’m not limited by high housing expenses, I can fly there just to visit a bar
And guess who will be there, ready to welcome you to Tucson. I call for an HBB meetup at the SkyBar! Anyone and everyone is invited! Let’s give vinceinwaukesha a proper welcome to the Old Pueblo!
home equity makes the world go round.
lmao
In 2004-2005 while working for TARP bank, we would sometimes call bank customers with existing HELOCs with low or zero balances to encourage them to draw money on them, a campaign called “Activation”. For every $1,000 these customers “activated” on their HELOCs we received $5 commission. Easy money compared with selling new HELOCs or loans. Our small but proud contribution to the bubble
Thank you Sir. May I have another?
$5? Man, EVERYBODY was getting screwed.
Vince, you don’t have to go as far as Wisconsin to find cheap housing. For example, here’s a house that’s within a 2 hour drive and a 1/2 hour Metro ride to the Smithsonian:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/580-Oak-St-Chambersburg-PA-17201/78633206_zpid/
(expanded 1974 manufactured home on 0.4 acre)
In fact there are some supercommuters who live just over the MD/PA line and commute into the northern suburbs each day. If they were smart, they would have bought a $70K house leaving them fat stacks of cash, and then retire in the house as an Oil City plan. But no, those yahoos “drove until they could afford” a new build.
Darnit, sorry wrong thread. This was to answer vince about living cheap and traveling to culture.
By the way, there are a LOT of people who don’t take advantage of the nearby culture either. Many MD residents haven’t been within sight of the Washington Monument in years. I go downtown occasionally, but to be honest I’m so frustrated with Metro delays and screaming tourists of stroller age that I don’t go often.
Which is why it is great to live close enough that if the Metro is a mess, I can just take the bus in on a weekend. Just one bus will get me from my place to right across the street from Air and Space in less than 50 minutes on a weekend and I can read during the trip.
My credit union used to throw HELOC parties in the lobby. Complete with popcorn.
Being a good HBB-er and fan of “Got Popcorn?” Neil, the irony was not lost on me.
A half percentage drop on mortgage rates will drop the monthly payment 6% on a $300K loan which translates into further devaluing of the dollar.
Or $100K or $10M.
Godesses Are Liars:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rhinestone-Real-Estate-Goddess-Realtor-Pin-/350585748506?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item51a089fc1a
Sarah Palin: Mama grizzlies united
By Diana Reese CLEVELAND, Mo—Sarah Palin did not disappoint.
“The crowd cheered and applauded repeatedly during her speech here Friday night, from her opening remarks about “mama grizzlies” on the Missouri state flag to her promise to stop at the local Chick-fil-A for a midnight snack.
Palin was in the Kansas City area to campaign for Sarah Steelman, who’s in a tight three-way race in Tuesday’s Republican primary for Missouri’s U.S. Senate seat. The winner will face Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) in November.
Palin was there to lend some of her magic to Steelman, who shares not only her conservative views but an independence and willingness to buck the political system. (One of Steelman’s goals is to end Congressional pensions, for example.)
Somehow, Palin has achieved celebrity status since the 2008 election. How many failed vice presidential candidates and former Alaska governors end up with book deals and reality TV shows? With an estimated net worth of $12 million?
When Palin took to the makeshift stage in the middle of a Missouri farm field, she was dressed more for the part of Hollywood celebrity than serious politician. But it was hard for me to take Palin seriously dressed as she was.
First, her shoes: Five-inch wedges. Her black capris weren’t quite skin-tight but tight enough, and her t-shirt with its Superman logo (a Steelman campaign shirt emblazoned with “Our freedom. Our fight.”) emphasized her figure. She never once removed her oversized sunglasses.”
“When Palin took to the makeshift stage in the middle of a Missouri farm field, she was dressed more for the part of Hollywood celebrity than serious politician.”
No she wasn’t. She as dressed like a white trash meth head. I saw that picture.
The woman who almost became this country’s first female Vice President:
http://oi50.tinypic.com/2w2ip34.jpg
The RNC sure does fire lots of bullets for the American voter to dodge.
the DNC gave us Obama…. a make-believe candidate with a made-up past. Give us a break please.
remember also that Pelosi signed the qualifications statement in two forms, one for Hawaii saying he met the Constitutional requirements for Office and one for everyone else, which does not say he qualified under the Constitution of the U.S.
and….. he got elected.
The effect of all the executive orders is only beginning to take hold, and the Costs of “healthcare” will be added starting NEXT year, conveniently, after the next election cycle.
I’ve never understood the criticism of Palin, when you stand her next to the gaftster BIDEN, she looks like a genius.
Give us a break please
I’m not criticizing Palin, she looks hot in that pic. I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.
I’m not criticizing Palin, she looks hot in that pic. I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.
I get your drift. Say what you will about Joe Biden, he sure ended up with a hottie for a second wife.
“I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.”
+1 x the US National Debt
“I would rather have sex with Sarah Palin than with Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.”
If these are the choices I think we should take our lead from Sarah and others who preach abstinence.
Sorry Sarah, Steelman lost the primary yesterday.
Sorry Oxide, but Cruz won the primary last week. It’s hilarious how the PDS sufferers ignore her wins (about 60-70%) and focus on her losses.
the Costs of “healthcare” will be added starting NEXT year ??
Yeah…The owner of Pappa Johns (Romney Contributor) had his crying towel out today complaining about the new health care requirement going to cost an extra 14-cents per pizza…14-fricken extra cents for a pizza in return for health care…
The woman who almost became this country’s first female
VicePresident:http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-PT227_hillar_DV_20110921103837.jpg
The last 20 years haven’t been kind but she was hot in 1992.
“The last 20 years haven’t been kind but she was hot in 1992.”
I am assuming your lasik surgery was in 1993.
Hot if you like hairlips and crossed eyes. lmao
Wouldn’t that be Geraldine Ferraro? I guess it depends on your definition of “almost.”
That would indeed be Geraldine Ferraro. Mondale’s veep pick in 1984.
Who was never “almost” the VP. Compare 2008 election results with 1984.
Give her a smoke and she’d be Peg Bundy.
great rack
lol
i think she’s an idiot that i would never vote for in a million years…but i do think she is pretty hot.
Why is it that almost every woman running for office gets trashed for what she wears. Humm, could it be men are afraid that they’ll get into office show them up? I think most men should be afraid, very afraid!
Palin does look trashy (but hot) in that outfit. She pales in comparison to the elegance and sexiness of Michele Bachmann.
Republican women in elected office are more hot than the Democrats.
i think pelosi is kinda hot…old…but hot.
Both are the imagine of mental health!
I can only think of twelve million reasons why she would want to do this.
Interesting shows on Alaska bush pilots….women are tough in AK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaaB-_iOTPg
“… women are tough in AK.”
Yep. Wiki-up “Susan Butcher” for an example.
Another leftist paper hanger finding time to criticize Palin. It’s amazing the obsession the LEFT has with her. She can’t go outside without them finding fault with her family, her dress, her demeanor, her speech, where she shops, what she eats, and whatever she has to say.
It’s almost non-stop.
And, yet, I am CERTAIN that if this same writer saw Obama in a ‘gansta’ hoodie with a backward ball cap and pants hanging down around his butt, she would think he was “hip”, not a moronic-looking dumbass, and of course, would take him quite seriously because he can read a script.
And, yet, I am CERTAIN that if this same writer saw Obama in a ‘gansta’ hoodie with a backward ball cap and pants hanging down around his butt, she would think he was “hip”, not a moronic-looking dumbass, and of course, would take him quite seriously because he can read a script.
Speaking as someone who has more than a little bit of script reading experience, it’s not that easy. Nor is using a Teleprompter. I would love to have one of those when I’m on the air. But the station doesn’t have the budget, so I just have to make do with reading off paper and a computer screen.
As for the hoodie, low-slung pants, and backward baseball cap thing, I think it looks stupid. And you’ve probably noticed that President Obama doesn’t dress that way.
That was the old test for an announcer rip and read no practicing.
so I just have to make do with reading off paper and a computer screen.
I’ve been practicing just by opening books to any old place. Then I start reading.
This is a great way to improve your cold reading. I can’t recommend it enough.
The LEFT. All caps. Do you shriek it each time you say it?
A good start for a hysterical and moronic post, I guess… it’s pretty obvious why she’s your idol. You’re birds of a feather.
finding fault with her
I find fault with her quitting her job as Governor for what, exactly? That’s all I need to know.
First, her shoes: Five-inch wedges. Her black capris weren’t quite skin-tight but tight enough, and her t-shirt with its Superman logo (a Steelman campaign shirt emblazoned with “Our freedom. Our fight.”) emphasized her figure. She never once removed her oversized sunglasses.”
How in the Sam Hill did she walk in those shoes? They sound like a moving OSHA violation!
OSHA is for the work-place, not for the working-it-place.
Women do the dumbest things to supposedly give them a visual edge. Pointy shoes is another example.
I was never terribly gifted in the visual edge department.
Instead, I rely on the quick wit and the clever turn of the phrase. Which attracts some guys and intimidates others.
I can spell. I sware.
U swar? I dun’t beleeve u.
Update on what I mentioned about a week ago about the shortage of the Red plastic gas cans in the South . Lawyers bankrupted the small USA company that made them , because people were pouring gas on fires with them, and being made in the US ,were fair game to lawsuits .
There are red plastic gas cans available again now in the stores, they cost 3 times what the old ones did , are No-name (Chinese) , and are plastered with warnings about not pouring gas on fires.We bet they will get brittle in 6 months ,too,
The feral money-sucking lawyers made theirs on the lawsuits , now we pay with almost certainly cheaper quality , but much higher priced items,
‘people were pouring gas on fires with them’
Did Bernanke get sued too?
Snort!
Is it too late for us to enter a class-action lawsuit against him?
(See, not all lawsuits are bad.)
You blame the lawyers because they were hired by stupid people?
Contrary to popular belief, lawyers really can’t initiate lawsuits on their own, even though the “ambulance chasing” rules and regulations have been slightly lessened over the years, they are still very restricted from actively pursuing clients…. just for that reason.
The more likely reason is that the mfg did what everyone else did: just stop operations here to save a buck and ordered form the Chinese and then blamed it on fabricated circumstances beyond their control, much like local governments like to blame public unions for their budget shortfalls instead of the billions in tax breaks they gave large corporations.
“… they are still very restricted from actively pursuing clients …”
That’s why we don’t see lawyer ads on TV.
That’s what I thought. I see so many lawyer ads. I think I can call anyone anytime of the day for the flimsiest of the reason and I still think the lawyers would most likely “work” with me building a case.
That’s my retirement plan.
my now three year old son is going to be a starting pitcher with the NY Yankees…that’s my retirmenet plan.
my now three year old son is going to be a starting pitcher with the NY Yankees…that’s my retirmenet plan.
I think my odds are better. I will always find a lawyer to sue for me.
You left out the context:
…even though the “ambulance chasing” rules and regulations have been slightly lessened over the years, they are still very restricted from actively pursuing clients
Are you telling me that if the lawyer was the one injured pouring gas out of the can on to the fire that he cannot initiate a lawsuit and be his own lawyer or expand it to a class action suit?
No. How in the world did you read that into my post?
Sorry, I thought it was understood we were talking about OTHER people suing the company.
But honestly, I AM just speculating because Jess has posted no link or reference or way to verify his story. Maybe it WAS a lawyer who did this by himself.
Linky - http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2012/07/blitz-usa-closes-oklahoma-factory.php
On December 28, 2005, David Calder tried to start a fire in his wood-burning stove in his trailer home—by inserting the nozzle of a $3.99 gas can into the stove to pour gas onto the fire, which Calder admitted was “stupid.” (The container itself had “KEEP AWAY FROM FLAMES, PILOT LIGHTS, STOVES, HEATERS, ELECTRIC MOTORS, AND OTHER SOURCES OF IGNITION.” impressed into the plastic; nevertheless, Calder included a failure-to-warn claim in his suit.) The resulting catastrophe killed his two-year-old daughter and severely burned Calder. This was, Calder argued, the fault of Blitz USA, the manufacturer of the gas can, for not including more idiot-proofing, though no gas container could reasonably protect against the idiocy of Calder’s actions. A Clinton-appointed federal district judge refused to throw the case out, and refused to let Blitz USA argue the “state-of-the-art” product liability defense or argue that it complied with government regulations for the manufacture of gas cans. A sympathetic jury found millions of dollars of damages, and blamed Blitz USA to the tune of 70% of the damages. So Blitz USA, which used to employ 117 people at a factory in Oklahoma to manufacture about 75% of the gas cans sold in the US, is liquidating in bankruptcy, and Americans will have to get their gas cans from Chinese manufacturers—or resort to even more unsafe containers like milk jugs if there is a gas-can shortage during this year’s hurricane season. So trial lawyer greed and a trial-lawyer-friendly judicial appointment has cost jobs, made Americans less safe, and increased carbon emissions from the need to import bulky gas cans from overseas.
Thanks!
…there’s something fishy about all that…
Ahhh. God, I LOVE the Internet.
http://www.setexasrecord.com/news/245316-blitz-usa-closes-plant-due-to-cost-of-lawsuits
Since 2007, the Southeast Texas Record has reported on about 10 suits filed against Blitz USA in the U.S. Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
http://www.setexasrecord.com/news/245317-suits-against-blitz-usa-include-several-from-eastern-district-of-texas
I do think that plaintiffs’ lawyers, if they get a really good recovery on some action, go trolling for more clients to do the same thing with. That can be anything from product liability to child abuse lawsuits. The truth of the matter is irrelevant. All they have to do is convince a stupid jury, or get a nice settlement.
They do.
Guess who are some of the biggest campaign contributors in America?
Trial Lawyers.
And guess who they give most of their money to?
Democrats.
And guess who blocks tort reform at every opportunity?
Democrats.
“Tort reform” reformed nothing but consequences for negligent business entities.
But wait, aren’t you a champion of free market values and less regulations? And what’s more free market than suing for negligence because there was less regulation?
They shouldn’t sue? Than how do you redress negligence? No regs, no lawsuits? What does that leave? Name calling?
Since when does a free market mean you can sue anyone for any reason for the slimmest hopes of hitting a jackpot?
How about we have loser pays? That is VERY free market. You bring a lawsuit and you lose - you pay for the other guy’s cost.
Ah - but the trial lawyers and democrats will not allow that.
I agree that loser paying all costs would change this game totally and to the good. There would be less settlements; suits would proceed to a conclusion based on merits.
And about 95% of suits would NEVER be filed.
I agree that loser paying all costs would change this game totally and to the good. There would be less settlements; suits would proceed to a conclusion based on merits.
It also means that the little guy would never be able to sue. You can’t be totally sure you will win a case no matter how good the merits. And the big corporations can hire an army of lawyers just to jack up their costs. So if you figure you have a 70% chance of winning, but that 30% chance of losing means you will incur $10 million of the other sides’ costs = losing everything you have. Too much risk.
The real solution is for the person who sues to get reimbursed for the cost to them of the injury (medical, lost wages, etc.) and some reimbursment for pain and suffering and a reasonable hourly rate to go to their attorney and the rest of the award - the part that is supposed make the big company not do that anymore - goes elsewhere. Perhaps directly to pay down government debt. Because if the award is too small, it just leaves business saying that hurting people is fine/acceptable cost of doing business. Bad idea. But giving the part that is to punish the company to the person who is hurt is absurd - the amount has no relation to his injury. The money should go elsewhere. And bringing the compensation to the attorney down to a reaonable hourly rate also gets rid of the lawyer’s over sized incentive to bring the suits.
Polly;
Your solution just means more rules and more lawyers. Keep it simple; if you lose you pay. If it is important enough to sue, it is important enough to pay when you lose (English Rule). Nearly every Western democracy, other than the United States, follows the English rule.
What country has the most lawyers per capita?
U.S.A.: There is one lawyer for every 265 Americans.
OK but if you sue you can dictate how much both sides can spend and it has to be equal. ie if I use a 300 dollar an hour lawyer you get one 300 dollar an hour lawyer and anytime the corporate lawyer bills more than my lawyer the corporation is responsible for that amount.
Which leaves you with zero chance to access the legal system for anyone who isn’t 100% sure they can win against the largest legal team the party that injured them can put forward. Mom and pop store? They’ll get sued by everyone because their legal team is no larger than yours. Big multinationals can do anything they want and never even get sued because you can’t win against the full resources of their legal team. Just another form of “too big to fail.” Welcome to justice by the rich, for the rich and only for the rich.
Personally, I have observed no lapse in my ability to buy red gas cans.
Same here. Just overpriced at gas stations as opposed to big box stores, but it’s always been that way, those dang opportunists!
The stock market is in a massive bubble, and a meltdown is coming.
The Plunge Protection Team is in hyperdrive for now…the MarketWatch people are behind the curve.
Stocks losing some steam
Wall Street thinks better of extending three-day winning streak, at least to start.
Aug. 8, 2012, 10:05 a.m. EDT
U.S. stocks lose steam after 3-day rise
By Kate Gibson, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks started lower on Wednesday, with investors sidelined after a three-session winning streak.
“It appears this week’s three-day global stock market rally is running out of steam. Overnight, we saw Spanish debt yields drift slightly higher, providing a minor downtick in this near-term trading indicator for the euro,” emailed Fred Dickson, chief investment strategist at Davidson Cos.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA -0.03%) declined 13.10 points, or 0.1%, to 13,156.9.
…
I’ve been trying to wrap my brain around where we are headed and I came to the conclusion that home mortgages should follow the bank interest rates down to the two percent level. That will drive more speculators and investors to pull money out of the bank for property as well as the old timers turning to property management (ie. LL). The people already in housing and not under water will be able to refi at lower rates and have more spendable income to support the economy. At low rates housing would be transferred to stronger hands and we wouldn’t need QW 3.
I see a 30-year same-as-cash era coming up for houses. Imagine the prices houses could go to if you knew you were not paying any interest at all!!! Instant extra equity after the first payment and all that. I’ll tell ya, it will be a real men of genius market then.
Geez, AB, don’t give them any ideas!
I think you may be right about where interest rates are going. The FED is trying to push them down in the belief that low rates “stimulate” business. I am of the contention that low rates stimulate mal-investment.
That is how we got here in the first place. We are following Japan’s lead to an economy wherein investment returns are ZERO.
Why invest? Without market-set interest rates and 100% reserve banking, the “markets” don’t know where to put their money.
It’s like the Soviets “planned economy”. They made lots of stuff no one wanted and couldn’t get the stuff people did. We could build “solar energy” plants like Solyndra. Yea, that’s what we need. With Free money we can all think like Obama. WE can build ANYTHING. That will create employment. Build Citrus farms in Alaska. Yea.
I have a dream. I have a vision!!
Who knows, maybe we can get more ‘investment’ in real estate and push up prices to 2005 levels. Wouldn’t that be nice?
Why choose citrus farms in Alaska and Solyndra why not the internet, the US highway system, all the benefits that came from gov sponsored research, etc
1. Rebuild our infrastructure -Schools, roads, transmission grid, communications.
2. Why not increase our energy efficiency and install cogeneration in all gov buildings 2-3 x as efficient as central power an.d requires labor
3. Alternative energy we could tax foreign oil to make it happen,
4. Cut payroll taxes make labor more affordable in the US, we could use debt VAT tax energy tax to pay for it.
Why choose citrus farms in Alaska and Solyndra why not the internet
Because for every dollar spent, may be a dime or nickel worth of return we get. Rest is waste/corruption/Mal-investment.
Is this really all you have in terms of energy plans?
We’ve got literally trillions of dollars of oil/gas available in the US. Yet the left’s efforts are devoted to Solyndra tax credits and caulking windows in govt buildings.
Ooops I almost forgot the other central plan in Obama’s energy policy. Inflate your tires.
The solar panel and install business is booming and has been even through the current economy. The Solydrna failure is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall industry activity.
Yes, it’s that big and growing. Google News.
Energy and mfg are about to change radically. No, I take that back: ARE changing radically.
There is a very successful craft brewery in Fort Collins (New Belgium, the makers of Fat Tire) that use 100% renewable energy. And New Belgium isn’t a mom-n-pop operation. It’s one of the biggest, if not the biggest, craft brewer in the USA. If you are ever in Fort Collins I recommend that you take the tour (free samples at the end too)
transmission grid
and
Energy and mfg are about to change radically.
Considering getting my MSEE for this reason. Already have the BS. Why the MS? Because I’ve been out of the industry, so to speak, being more on the biz development side.
Plus a lot of employers won’t touch if you don’t have a Master’s
Yea.
I have a dream. I have a vision!!
OK Diogenes you seem kinda stressed out on Obama but this might help. Just relax and visualize this:
Barack Hussein Obama II is the President of the United States.
Now picture Barack Hussein Obama’s face and repeat to yourself:
Barack Hussein Obama is my President (picture his face)
Barack Hussein Obama is my President
Better?
How would your analysis change if you discovered that the FED actually does not control interest rates? Can you think of another reason that interest rates might be low? Would that make you want to buy a house?
America the Anxious: Why We’re Freaking Out
by David Frum
Aug 6, 2012 1:00 AM EDT
The recession is over—but not for you. From penniless retirement accounts to frozen wages, demographic uneasiness to inept lawmakers, Newsweek’s David Frum breaks down the bad news.
Corporate profits are setting records. Companies hold mountains of cash. Private-sector output is growing 3 percent per year, in line with historic norms.
But jobs? The middling July numbers warn that it’s likely another half decade before the U.S. returns to full employment. How about prospects for a raise? Make us laugh. The future? Scary. The panic of 2008 has subsided, replaced by an ambient anxiety.
Crushed by debt, American households can’t afford to buy enough to put everyone to work. Even when households can afford to buy more, they are often buying products made by Chinese and Indian workers who work very nearly as well as Americans for a lot less pay. All of us are left to wonder: What happens to me in this new world? When can I retire? Where do I put what’s left of my savings? Will Medicare still exist when I need it?
In this election year, both presidential candidates are competing to offer a response to the anxious mood. President Obama urges Americans to put their trust in more and bigger government. In an important speech in Kansas last year, the president defined his vision for the American middle class: more government employment, more government contracting to stabilize employment in the private sector, and higher taxes on wealthier Americans to pay for it all.
Challenger Mitt Romney has not been so explicit, but his message is equally clear: don’t fight anxiety—embrace it. Medicare will become a voucher for Americans under 55. Medicaid and other social programs will radically shrink. Restrictions on the financial industry will be rolled back. Even less will be guaranteed than today—in the hope of unleashing pent-up dynamism.
About 46 percent of the country rejects the Obama approach. Another 46 percent rejects the Romney proposal. There’s not much enthusiasm anywhere for either. Four years ago, Americans looked to politics for “hope” and “change.” Today’s mood is bleaker. The incumbent seems defeated by the nation’s worries. The challenger seems indifferent to them. Altogether, the political system seems overwhelmed.
Fewer than one third of Americans believe the country is on the right track. Suicides are up; birth rates are down. Business leaders say they can’t hire because they feel so uncertain about future government regulation; consumers won’t buy because they feel so uncertain about their future incomes.
In past periods of economic distress—the 1890s and 1930s—Americans protested in the streets. Not this time. Occupy Wall Street has gone home. The Tea Party has been absorbed into the Republican Party. Today, Americans have been left to face their worries alone.
…
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-25/prescription-painkiller-abuse-surged-in-u-s-study-finds.html
Abuse of prescription drugs .
While they blame the patient for taking drugs without a medical need ,the question becomes why are the Doctors writing these
prescriptions that no doubt makes Pharma drug companies richer . This article places the entire blame on the person taking these addiction drugs ,while the Doctor and Drug Company isn’t part of the cause ,or even addressed as medical abuse .
There has been a serious detachment from the part the greedy
medical /Pharma industry is playing in being the ‘Dope Pusher “. This is also the case for all the anti-depression drugs that are handed out like candy these days by the medical/psychology fields.
A neighbor of mine was given a long term anti-depression drug by a doctor just because she was going through short term stress
because her husband was having a back operation . The neighbor is now on this anti-depression long term and her personality is like a zombie now .
No doubt the Doctor got perks from the Drug Company for writing such a absurd prescription .
Life has some short term stress in it at times ,but is this cause to keep a person on a anit-depression drug long term at a huge expense to this womens health , as well as the overall health care costs ?
That’s why I say ,the corruption has to be taken out of the Medical business and the high cost American health care for us to come close to a sustainable health care system . Would these
people take these anit-depression drugs long term if they knew that it will knock 10 to 20 years off their life span, or raise the risk of suicide ? The whole trend these days is how many drugs
can a Doctor get a patient on ,without really trying . This is what happens when you have Drug Companies making about 4 trillion a year,while being a big lobby group .
I content that the corruption is huge in the Health care industry and drug industry and not only with the Banks and
Wall Street investment firms .
As mentioned here before, I’m not going through the easiest of times, what with dealing with the declining health of now it’s up to four family members and my own struggles to get my business back to what it was before this Great Recession.
What truly amazes me is that no one has suggested that I go into therapy or get on some sort of drug. I guess I don’t hang around the doctor/pharma types very much, I dunno.
But if I were more of the doctor-going type, I’m sure I’d be toting all sorts of scrips. Not that I’d fill them, mind you, but oh, would they be offered.
Slim I order you to see a shrink….or better yet be a DJ…..it helps soothe the blues away!!!
Slim I order you to see a shrink….or better yet be a DJ…..it helps soothe the blues away!!!
Funny you should mention the blues, NYC.
Because that will be my next scheduled show on KXCI. August 19 at 5 p.m. Get ready for an hour of women in the blues.
Tonight I experienced the ultimate alternative to a visit to a shrink: A Branford Marsalis concert! Nobody ever told me in my music school days that playing music was supposed to be fun…
Cool. Wyton’s attitude gets on my nerves but I like Branford.
“There has been a serious detachment from the part the greedy medical /Pharma industry is playing in being the ‘Dope Pusher.’ This is also the case for all the anti-depression drugs that are handed out like candy these days by the medical/psychology fields.”
Yep, and even worse is that the massive amounts of chemicals/drugs you are feeding into your system are useless about 75% of the time. The side effects are real, but the medical effects are not:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/01/28/the-depressing-news-about-antidepressants.html
How about more play, more community, more culture and less drugs? Hmmmm, not enough money in it.
“When can I retire?”
When your health fails.
“Where do I put what’s left of my savings?”
T-bills at minus 2.0% per year in real dollars.
“Will Medicare still exist when I need it?”
The Democrats will provide medical marijuanna followed by legal assisted suicide. The Republicans don’t even want people to get that.
penniless retirement accounts to frozen wages, demographic uneasiness to inept lawmakers,…Corporate profits are setting records. Companies hold mountains of cash….American households can’t afford to buy enough to put everyone to work. Even when households can afford to buy more, they are often buying products made by Chinese and Indian workers
All of the above is the end result of massive wealth redistribution from the average American to the super-rich - Reagan/Romney Voodoo Economics.
So let’s double down with Romney’s tax plan that takes more from the middle to give to the top. Yea. That’s the ticket.
Why do you hate Chinese and Indian workers so much?
“Corporate profits are setting records. Companies hold mountains of cash. Private-sector output is growing 3 percent per year, in line with historic norms.”
This doubles as (part of) the reason for a 13k Dow but why “the market” doesn’t correlate well with “the economy.”
DOW 13,000 is not long for the world. Hello, crash.
I know some here like a good study so……
Como se dice SNARP?
Nearly half of all immigrants on welfare
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/8/slow-path-to-progress-for-us-immigrants/
43% on welfare after 20 years
Immigrants lag behind native-born Americans on most measures of economic well-being — even those who have been in the U.S. the longest, according to a report from the Center for Immigration Studies, which argues that full assimilation is a more complex task than overcoming language or cultural differences.
The study, which covers all immigrants, legal and illegal, and their U.S.-born children younger than 18, found that immigrants tend to make economic progress by most measures the longer they live in the U.S. but lag well behind native-born Americans on factors such as poverty, health insurance coverage and homeownership.
The study, based on 2010 and 2011 census data, found that 43 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S. at least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as high as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent immigrants.
The report was released at a time when both major presidential candidates have backed policies that would make it easier to immigrate legally and would boost the numbers of people coming to the U.S.
Steven A. Camarota, the center’s research director and author of the 96-page study, said it shows that questions about the pros and cons of immigration extend well beyond the sheer numbers and touch on the broader consequences of assimilating a population defined by tougher socioeconomic challenges.
“Look, we know a lot of these folks are going to be poor, we get it. But don’t tell the public it’s all going great, which is the story line I think a lot of people want to sell,” Mr. Camarota said. “There is progress over time. Every measure shows improvement over time, but still, the situation does not look like we’d like it to look, particularly for the less-educated. They lag well behind natives even when they’ve been here for two decades, and that is very disconcerting.”
Federal law requires that the government deny immigrant visas to potential immigrants who are likely to be unable to support themselves and thereby become public charges.
On Tuesday, a handful of Republican senators wrote to the Homeland Security and State departments asking them to explain why they don’t consider whether potential immigrants would use many of the nearly 80 federal welfare programs when they evaluate visa applications.
Neither department responded to messages Tuesday seeking a response to the senators’ letter.
Expanding legal immigration is a contentious issue for voters, the vast majority of whom tell pollsters that they want the levels either retained or decreased.
But most politicians want legal immigration expanded.
During his time in the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama backed bills that would have dramatically boosted legal immigration, potentially by hundreds of thousands a year. As president, he has called for the same thing.
Immigrants made up more than half of all farmworkers, 41 percent of taxi drivers and 48 percent of maids and housecleaners, but they also represented about one-third of all computer programmers and 27 percent of doctors.
The center found that use of public benefits varied dramatically based on where immigrants originated.
Mexicans were most likely to use means-tested benefit programs, with 57 percent, while 6 percent of those from the United Kingdom did. The rate for native-born Americans is 23 percent.
———————————————————————————-
“the situation does not look like we’d like it to look, particularly for the less-educated. They lag well behind natives even when they’ve been here for two decades, and that is very disconcerting.”
That is disconcerting, when did we become natives? Well that doesn`t look like we’d like it to look at all. So how about this….
Let the less-educated immigrants take out some student loans and get educated so the federal government can get some of our money back by withholding it from their nearly 80 federal welfare programs like they do with native-born Americans and their Social Security benefits. That will fix it.
It is Racist® to discuss this. Please make out your donation check to Race Hustlers, Inc® and proceed to the Re-Education Camp©.
Let the less-educated immigrants take out some student loans and get educated …………
you actually believe “education” is the problem.
I submit that letting these people into the school system would only drag down the quality of education and the results of public education to levels more in line with Mexico.
“you actually believe “education” is the problem.”
Um, that was a joke.
And as far as “public education to levels more in line with Mexico.” you drive by Jerry Thomas Elementary in Jupiter Fl. at 3PM when the kids get out and you would think you were in Mexico, or Guatemala. ESOL is big here.
I rather we make it much tougher to immigrate to the U.S. IQ above 120 and clean background we will take you. IQ 110 and above, we will consider you. IQ 100-110 unless you have a skill we need, no. Below 100, no way. No family reunification policy. There a policy that works, it is racially neutral and the high IQ people will generate more jobs than they take so we even reduce unemployment.
I think Canada does that at some level with its point system.
Come to think of it, Individual legal immigrants (people on visa) in USA are mostly with IQ of 100 or above; students, business people, skilled workers, etc. The people crossing the border, visa lottery winners, family visa types, refugees, etc. makes it worse for us….I think.
OT, I would be interested to know if there’s a connection between the increase of welfare state in US and the increase of border crossing.
According to my bilingual ed teacher sister, virtually all of her students receive welfare benefits.
And that’s my point Colorado….No English No Ebt card
Let them make a choice as to which language they prefer.
That’s Hope and Change we can believe in
I’d take it a step further, only citizens should be eligible for any form of public aid.
I bet most of those kids are US citizens.
Some are, but according to my sis, most of her students are from Mexico and are illegals. Granted, that is an anecdote.
I propose a restriction on the H1B program: You get to come work for 2-3 years. But only you. No parents, NO wife, and no hardship provision.
Eventually everyone will be a citizen.
I say more the merrier. Legals, Illegals we take them all. It’s only natural for people to move to places they think they will have a better life.
Do you want to buy the world a Coke too?
Obama just gutted the Welfare Reform bill signed by Bill Clinton. Expect the 43% to go much, much higher in the coming years.
I don’t blame the immigrants for this. If the govt hands out welfare like candy, you can’t be mad at people for taking it. This is all part of a concerted effort by the left to get as many people permanently dependent on govt as possible. Every new welfare recipient - native born or immigrant - is a life long Democrat voter.
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-12/mississippi-whites-not-used-to-help-back-republican-aid-cutters.html
Please consider looking beyond the talking points sometime? The law Obama signed returned some powers to the States in regard to disposition of federal welfare assistance funding. So-called “Workfare” is not a cost effective program, (that means it costs more to administer than it saves, Smithers) and the paperwork issues alone were the reason for this “gutting welfare reform” legislation.
It’s useful to look beyond the talking points to get to the truth, but it does take a certain commitment to seeking it out….
A number of my work colleges, have interest only mortgages. In the 1980’s early 1990’s these where common in the UK; the mortgage would be paid off by an endowment policy invested in shares and bonds (this would cover the mortgage and leave you with a healthy lump sum, or so the salesmen said).
Today in work I spent a happy hour listening to a college arguing with a Help Desk about his mortgage, his endowment had paid up but he was twelve thousand pounds short. The gist of the conversation was from his point of view how they’d cover the short fall and from there’s how would he cover the short fall. No decision was made but I fear it won’t end well for him.
This conversation lead to two questions popping into my mind
1) How could this have come as a surprise to him
and
2) Are endowment mortgages a UK only occurrence or are they sold in other countries?
2) Are endowment mortgages a UK only occurrence or are they sold in other countries?
Can’t speak of endowment in US. When I owned a home, I set up an escrow account with the bank. It was a common occurrence that my escrow ran short and the bank would withdraw as needed from my savings account. I don’t think there was a fraud or anything like that. At least I could not prove it.
The moral of the story is NEVER TRUST ANYONE TO MANAGE YOUR MONEY. There are always surprises, not the nice ones.
Houses still cost too much.
And the City-Data forums are overrun with NAR hacks.
‘And the City-Data forums are overrun with NAR hacks.’
I’ve heard that before. So much so, I stopped frequenting the real estate forums there. I still listen to Gil Gross on Sundays on the local radio station here. I just can’t help myself. Love it when Larry Yun calls in and gives the real estate citrus report.
+1
Indiana: Hundreds of manufacturing jobs go unfilled
CNNMoney.com - By Parija Kavilanz - August 8th, 2012
There are hundreds of factory jobs ready for the taking as the area’s manufacturing sector has come back to life after the recession.
But even with an unemployment rate as high as the national average, companies are struggling to hire workers.
His challenge: “I’ll have to go through 500 applicants just to get the 10 that I need. And there’s no guarantee that those 10 hires will work out.
A labor shortage isn’t the problem. Companies are getting hundreds of applicants, she said. But they are either not the right fit or unqualified.
“Applicants are failing drug tests,” she said. “Some apply and then decide they want to wait until their unemployment benefit runs out before taking a factory job.”
Then there are the candidates with four-year college degrees who can’t find other work. Manufacturers shy away from hiring them, believing they’ll leave as soon as they find a job that’s a better fit.
At Daman Manifolds, among hundreds of applications the company will review in coming weeks, half will likely get dumped because folks won’t fill out the entire eight-page form, Davis said. Another big chunk won’t make it past the phone interview.
Several more will fail the hands-on assessment because they lack the right skills.
Bell estimates that the state needs about 40,000 to 50,000 manufacturing workers right now to meet the uptick in production.
All four were offered a job, and only one accepted, he said. “These statistics are not unusual at all among manufacturers here,” he said.
“All four were offered a job, and only one accepted, he said.”
And that is because …? Oh, since we were never told I guess we will never know.
Applicants bother to show up, bother to fillout - what? - an eight page application form? and then they say “no” to the job offer?
Why would they do this?
(snark)
To stay eligible for unemployment insurance?
One stays eligible for unemployment insurance if he turns down a job offer?
No, but he had to go and fill out forms etc to prove that he or she was actively seeking a job and that was the question.
The complete question involving him saying “no” to the job offer.
Its not that simple….what would I know about a machine that puts caps on bottles?
You are asking the wrong question.
Ok Should they take a job that was offered, and lose UI and maybe other benefits, and risk the boss is a psycho, and will fire you next week for being 38 minutes late because you were a witness for a car accident?
Then the boss claims you are unreliable and now have to fight to get your UI back which takes 8-10 weeks…..so how do you survive?
Curiously, the article omits mentioning the average pay. It also neglects to mention what the “right skills” are. Are these machinist jobs or are they assembly positions?
If the “right kind” of applicants aren’t showing up there is a simple, market based solution to the problem: pay more.
Heck, I see this in the software biz. Companies open reqs but can’t find people. More than once in my career, I received a job offer that paid LESS than my current salary. When I asked them if they were serious, they insisted that they were. When I asked them why should I take a new job at lower pay they simply shrugged their shoulders. I’m sure the hiring manager later told his boss “there’s no one to hire”
Yep.
“Heck, I see this in the software biz. Companies open reqs but can’t find people. More than once in my career, I received a job offer that paid LESS than my current salary. When I asked them if they were serious, they insisted that they were. When I asked them why should I take a new job at lower pay they simply shrugged their shoulders. I’m sure the hiring manager later told his boss “there’s no one to hire”
And eventually one of two things happens.
1. The manager raises the rate and finds someone
2. The manager realizes the extra person isn’t needed after all.
As usual the free market sorts it all out. Amazing how that works, eh?
“The manager raises the rate and finds someone”
Managers seldom have that discretion.
“Unqualified” I understand.
“not the right fit” is bullcrap. This means you offer NO training and orientation, which means you cut corners in other areas as well.
“wait until their unemployment benefit runs” tells us you don’t pay squat.
“believing they’ll leave as soon as they find a job that’s a better fit.”… and that’s different from everybody else, why? No, you don’t hire them because they might do a better job than their bosses… and you don’t pay squat.
8 page form? What is this, the 19th century? 8 pages? For what? Name and contact, employment history, references, criminal background, skills and education. Any more than that is none of your damn business.
But ultimately it’s ALL bullcrap. People will show up at the crack of dawn and shovel poop all day, every day, if the money is good.
“wait until their unemployment benefit runs” tells us you don’t pay squat.
Ding ding ding we have a winner. I had the max unemployment payment and it added up to about $20K after taxes. These manufacturers must be paying even less.
Sqeezed by debt crisis, Greek ditch cars for bikes
ekathimerini.com | Wednesday August 8, 2012 | By Karolina Tagaris
Greece’s dire economic plight has forced thousands of businesses to close, thrown one in five out of work and eroded the living standards of millions. But for bicycle-maker Giorgos Vogiatzis, it’s not all bad news.
The crisis has put cash-strapped Greeks on their bikes - once snubbed as a sign of poverty or just plain risky - and Greek manufacturers are shifting into fast gear.
The high cost of road tax, fuel and repairs is forcing Greeks to ditch their cars in huge numbers. According to the government’s statistics office, the number of cars on Greek roads declined by more than 40 percent in each of the last two years. Meanwhile, more than 200,000 bikes were sold in 2011, up about a quarter from the previous year.
A pay cut two years ago forced Koniaraki to give up her car under a ”cash for clunkers” scheme as she could no longer afford to pay the road tax or fill up her tank. She also moved from her house in a leafy northern Athens suburb to the centre.
And to get through a cash squeeze in March, she picked up a second-hand bike for the first time since childhood.
”At first my friends would laugh at me and say: Oh, poverty!” said Koniaraki, who now cycles to work from the foothills of the ancient Acropolis, past shop-gazing tourists in Plaka and through the bustling Syntagma square.
Greek manufacturers? Who knew? Seriously, it shows how austerity actually works. Less money going out for imported oil and money staying within the country for a product that they actually can manufacture.
Of course if they were like us, they would import their bikes (and everything else consumers buy) from China.
On the plus side Ms. Koniaraki will be in great shape.
‘ditch their cars in huge numbers’
All I can think is how great it would be for us here in the US to have the same humanity.
And now a musical interlude:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eG23MqIMos
Setting aside all the environmental benefits of more cyclists and less motorists, this is a clear sign of a country losing first world status.
New York real estate prices will be up due to rich French fleeing France?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/48568622
The problem with the rich these days is they think they can blackmail their Countries by saying if you don’t give us low tax rates we will take our marbles and go somewhere else .That’s the game that Corporations and the Rich are playing these days in this new Globalized World .
I say let them go. You got millions of Spanards fleeing Spain because of unemployment . Many unemployed young people fleeing
Ireland because of no employment . USA has had it influx of people fleeing here illegally to find work and handouts .
Basically Globalism and lack of maintainingg proper borders and tariffs and Universal min wages has created massive destablization .
The Corporations and money players just want to have slave labor and child labor and take back the labor gains and environment protections that were gained in the USA ,as well as screw up the tax base that is generated by employed workers in the USA ,yet we are suppose to give them greater tax breaks ?
The USA population should just start refusing to do business with the big Monopolies and start doing business with local small business and local small farmers and ,if there are any left in the USA . Actually I think we should start with penalty taxes for any outsourcing ,or out manufacturing ,and taking a wage from these shores .
Unless you had Universal and uniform wages in all Countries , as well as pollution standards ,your simply transfering dollars to the Corporations and the rich ,while slave and child labor is exploited
world wide while it erodes the tax base of any Country stupid enough to have other Countries producing their products . Its not as if the USA doesn’t have the natural resources to produce their own stuff as we did for decades and decades . I can understand
a Country needing some imports if they didn’t have the ability to
make the product .
Its suicide for a Country not to protect its job base and eventually there won’t be enough money tax wise to even feed the unemployed ,take care of intrastructure ,or anything that is needed for a Society to function on a higher level than a Nation with a bunch of poverty stricken people being the majority .
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/08/08/us/politics/08poll-results-documents.html
This is the data behind the data of a recent NY Times poll and I call BS. They seem to consider virtually all of the registered votes as being “likely voters” despite a 60% turn out in U.S. being very good. I will stick with Rasmussen.
We predict the 100% probability that Obamney will be (re)elected this year.
And what will remain unchanged after he is?
War in Afghanistan - check
Drone wars everywhere - check
TSA groping everyone - check
National Defense Authorization Act - check
PATRIOT Act - check
Wall Street owning Congress - check
Now back to your regularly scheduled Gays, Guns & God program…
A new Nobel Peace Prize?
There are 2 trustworthy pollsters. Rasmussen and Gallup. They both have a daily tracking poll and the breakdown along partisan lines is in line with actual voter turnout samples from recent elections. Both of them show a race tied at around 45/45. In general an incumbent polling below 50 loses.
Then you have NYT polls with D+15 samples that show - surprise, surprise a big Obama win. In 2008 at the height of Obama Mania, the turnout was D+8. In 2010 the turnout was even.
And yet laughably, the NYT expects 2012 to be D+15? Ohhhh-kay.
You should ignore polls that treat the electorate as a single entity. 45/45 doesn’t matter. 50/48 wouldn’t matter. 48/52 either.
The election isn’t one contest. It is 50 contests. If you aren’t looking at an electoral college analysis and polls for the swing states, you aren’t looking at a serious poll. I guarantee that the campaigns aren’t wasting their time with a poll that looks at the country as a whole.
Rasmussen does that very well. But remember Al Gore lost the electoral vote but won the popular vote. Republicans do better in the electoral vote than the popular vote since they win more low population states which still have two senators and thus get those two votes.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/07/models-models-everywhere/
Bingo!
Romney might have his “avalanche” in hard core red states, winning them by huge majorities, while Obama might win the majority of electoral votes by small margins.
Current casino odds on US presidential race:
Obama 2-5
Romney 15-8
Looks like the free market of gambling is picking Obama.
The Iowa Electronic Market futures prices also pick Obama, with increasing divergence in Obama’s favor since Romney’s London debacle.
Kinda ironic, given how Romney’s name with the ‘R’ removed is an anagram for Money.
Rasmussen?
It doesn’t get any more right wing that that.
He promised change. He delivered. 110 million Americans are now on welfare. All part of the Democrat plan for a permanent dependent class.
The data come “from the U.S. Census’s Survey of Income and Program Participation shows that nearly 110,000 million individuals received a welfare benefit in 2011. (These figures do not include other means-tested benefits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit or the health insurance premium subsidies included in the President’s health care law. CBO estimates that the premium subsidies, scheduled to begin in 2014, will cover at least 25 million individuals by the end of the decade.)”
This is not just Americans, however. “These figures include not only citizens, but non-citizens as well,” according to the committee.
110 million Americans are now on welfare. All part of the Democrat plan for a permanent dependent class.
Correction: All part of the Republican plan of the 1% stealing wealth from everyone else. Got wealth redistribution??
It is always the same answer from the left.
obama is still trying to correct the damage done under Bush.
4 years later - things are even worse.
But obama has no responsibility.
It gets SO old.
obama is still trying to correct the damage done under Bush.
Just Bush? You think too small. Obama inherited a structurally damaged economy due to 30 years of TrickleDownRichTakeAll/Offshoring wealth re-distribution.
4 years later - things are even worse.
And won’t get better until the wealth redistribution reverses. Will the Democrats address this? Maybe. Will Republicans? Never.
It gets SO old.
That you don’t get it?
4 years? 2009 - 2012 = 3
Math is be HARD for neocons.
“4 years? 2009 - 2012 = 3″
Jan 21, 2009 - Aug 8, 2012 = 3 years? So how many months is it from Aug 8, 2012 until Jan 2, 2013?
He couldn`t have played 100 rounds of golf and attended 132 re-election fundraisers in 3 years. It wouldn`t have left any time for his vacations.
I keep trying to set the record straight on this, against an endless Republican propaganda campaign to hide the truth.
But here it is again: THE GREAT RECESSION STARTED IN DECEMBER 2007, ON GEORGE W. BUSH’S WATCH.
So all the lame efforts by EddieTard and other Republican trolls to blame the bad economy on Obama amount to nothing but A PACK OF LIES.
WAKE UP, AMERICA!!! DON’T BELIEVE THE LYING LIARS WHO ENDLESSLY TRY TO DECEIVE YOU!!!!
Hottest July nationwide since records have been kept.
Anyone still bold (or deluded) enough to call Global Warming an Al Gore nutcase conspiracy?
The Earth is the ultimate “house” of humanity. How is the health of the world’s McMansion?
Look at peak oil and peak consumption, and the burning of coal for electricity. The real answer is to reduce world population immediately by 2 billion and force austerity worldwide of greenhouse gas emissions to avoid global collapse in 75 years. Any volunteers?
But no worries. We’ll nuke each other long before then.
Al Gore made it all up just to sell more movie tickets.
No, he made it up to sell carbon offset credits and become rich.
I think if you look at the global temeratures for the year you do not see anything special. South Africa just had snow for the first time since 1968. I do not argue that the Earth has warmed. The question is whether it is primarily man-made. Since 1998, we have put more CO2 in the air than we predicted at the time. However, we have not seen any global warming. The models predicted 1 degree per decade. Has not happened. So why should I believe that the warming is man-made. I do believe that a small per cent is man made but not anywhere need the proponents of man made warming
Again, a warmer atmosphere means more moisture in the atmosphere, which makes something like snow in S. Africa more likely to happen, not less.
Before someone nit picks first snow in Pretoria, SA since 1968.
But you still need the cold air and they are exeptionally cold. No I see it more and more the proponents are sounding more like the skeptics. When we still had real global warming, the skeptics to the warming itself would point to one area of the globe that was cool. Now, that true global warming has stopped the proponents will point to one area to say there global warming. After katrina we were told there global warming means more hurricanes now that we don’t see many that prediction is ignored.
If you take an iron turn it on and heat it up and then turn it off. If you plot the temperatures by seconds, you will find that some of the hottest temperatures on the graph occur after the iron is shutoff. After the highest sun spot number is 8000 years over the the last 50 years we are beginning to decline combine that with the PDO switching from warm to cold, I think some people are desperate to get the taxes in place before they can no longer hide the cooling.
“But you still need the cold air and they are exeptionally cold.”
That is another symptom of climate change. Mother Nature overcorrects in an attempt to find equilibrium. Like housing prices. It results in more extreme weather which means some places will receive record cold, others record heat. Droughts and flooding both become more common, depending on the area.
Pete gets it.
Now for some big words. (Ask your parent if you need help)
Asymmetric oscillation of a disturbed unstable dynamic system
Don’t bother. It’s like trying to convince a Protestant Fundy that the Earth is more than 6000 years old. You’re wasting your time.
Hottest July = proof of global warming. Got it.
Then using that logic, coldest January ever equals proof of global cooling. Right?
“Mind-boggling, historic cold has gripped the Last Frontier in recent weeks. Nome, Galena, and Bettles - in Alaska’s west and west interior - are all likely to have their coldest Januarys on record the National Weather Service reported today. It will likely be the 5th coldest January on record in Fairbanks, with a hard-to-imagine average temperature of -26.7. Anchorage is likely to log its 4th coldest January.”
Or how about the coldest February?
“February 10, 2012 – ROMANIA – Europe’s record freezing temperatures have claimed hundreds of lives, snarled traffic and trapped tens of thousands of residents in remote villages across Serbia and Romania. In this instance this big blocking of cold air . . . seemed to influence the way the winds behaved rather than the other way around,” he said. “We didn’t expect the cold block to become so persistent and then move westward.”
Or how about the coldest June?
“Vancouverites may love to complain about their “bummer summer,” but it’s not just casual griping any more. Current temperatures are on track to make this June the coldest on record. As of Wednesday, this month’s mean temperature — an average of the coldest and warmest temperatures each day — was 13.2 C. That’s a substantial drop from 2011’s mean temperature of 15.3 degrees.”
Or coldest May?
“Snow made an unwelcome appearance in Teesdale, County Durham, today as the cold weather was predicted to continue into next months with May forcecast to be the coldest for 100 years. The mercury dropped to around -2c (28f) overnight yesterday on high ground, although most of the snow had melted by late afternoon as temperatures rose to 7c (45f).”
See the big words I posted above.
No. Hottest June, coldest May, coldest May, hottest January…all those point to global warming. Thanks for supporting the point.
For your point of view, you don’t want records falling anywhere, either on the cold or hot side.
Smitty, you’re good on search!
I suggest people look at this website: http://isthereglobalcooling.com/
The only thing of value I see there is the notion of solar activity decreasing. If so, great! But the huge list of record-setting cold/snow episodes from ‘11 and ‘12 that the author cites only hurt his case, as those are a product of an unstable atmosphere.
He writes, “Global temperatures increased for twenty years from the late 1970s to the late 1990s but have either stopped warming or have begun to cool in the last fifteen years”. OK, which is it? If it’s based on official measurements, there is no room for debate whether it “stopped warming” or “began to cool”. It’s one or the other. Or perhaps one other option he didn’t mention.
The cure for global warming of course is Marxism. You know, the only kind where 95% of the people are slaves to the state. The other 5% are the high priests.
Fannie Mae put out their second quarter credit supplement today (which includes information on bubble state delinquency rates).
http://www.fanniemae.com/resources/file/ir/pdf/quarterly-annual-results/2012/q22012_credit_summary.pdf
On serious delinquencies:
CA is down from 2.24% to 2.07% (Q1 to Q2)
AZ is down from 3.22% to 2.82%
FL is down from 11.35% to 11%
NV is UP from 7.06% to 7.15%
Shadow inventory lurks in FL an NV far more than AZ and CA.
Hey Pimp…..
Inventory is skyrocketing in CA.
All the lies in the world can’t change reality.
And by the way, with 7,035,371 owner-occupied housing units in California, one in 135 in foreclosure implies there will be north of 50,000 foreclosure homes for the California market to work through in the next few years on top of normal supply plus new home construction. Sounds like there is no reason for prospective buyers to hurry up and buy now, as plenty more homes will be coming on to the market over the next few years.
California and Stockton top foreclosure statistics nationwide
By Matthew DeBord
Foreclosures Spike As Banks Accelerate Loan Default Notices
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
For sale signs are posted on a foreclosed house in Glendale, California. Foreclosures in the state are falling, but it still had the worst rate in July.
…from the July 2012 foreclosure report that Irvine-based RealtyTrac just released…, California had the country’s highest foreclosure rate in July, with “one in every 325″ homes at risk of reverting to bank ownership.
…
Meanwhile, at the municipal level, California sports the top four cities for foreclosures, with Stockton — now bankrupt — topping the list, with one in every 135 homes in foreclosure. Vallejo-Fairfield, Riverside- [also bankrupt] San Bernardino-Ontario, and Modesto follow Stockton. Then in come Palm Bay-Melbourbe-Titusville and Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater (numbers five and nine, respectively) in Florida to break up a sweep of the top ten by California’s beleaguered cities.
…
There were 47,190 homes sold in the State of California in the month of June 2012.
http://www.zillow.com/local-info/CA-home-value/r_9/#metric=mt%3D24%26dt%3D1%26tp%3D5%26rt%3D14%26r%3D9%252C394806%252C395057%252C395025%26el%3D0
It puts 50,000 homes in context.
Would you rather:
a) Lenders continue to foreclose on deadbeat borrowers (thus continue to have high foreclosure rates), and steadily decrease non-current loan numbers; or
b) Have lenders slow-play the problem, like in Florida, Nevada, New York and New Jersey, thus having lower foreclosure numbers, but high and stagnant numbers of non-current loans?
I don’t fully understand what is at stake in this political tug of war, but would be interested in the explanation from anyone who does.
(I do get the “23.7% upside down” part of the story.)
Aug. 8, 2012, 2:45 p.m. EDT
Housing regulator warns about ‘eminent domain’ use
By Steve Goldstein, MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The regulator for government-seized mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Wednesday warned against the use of so-called eminent domain to restructure mortgages.
San Bernardino County has proposed using such powers to seize distressed mortgages at a discount and then refinance them for struggling homeowners. Chicago officials also are considering the idea, according to reports. Although mortgage rates are near record lows, underwater homeowners are essentially blocked from refinancing their loans.
According to CoreLogic, some 11.4 million, or 23.7%, of all residential properties with a mortgage are “underwater” or “upside down” — meaning that borrowers owe more on their mortgage than their homes are worth. There are federal programs to aid such borrowers, but so far they are only available to a small segment of those mortgage holders.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency made clear its opposition to the use of eminent domain for fixing mortgages. “As conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and regulator of 12 Federal Home Loan Banks, FHFA has significant concerns about the use of eminent domain to revise existing financial contracts and the alteration of the value of the companies’ securities holdings,” the agency said in a statement.
“FHFA has determined that action may be necessary on its part to avoid a risk to safe and sound operations at its regulated entities and to avoid taxpayer expense. Additionally, FHFA has concerns that such programs could negatively affect the extension of credit to borrowers seeking to become homeowners and on investors that support the housing market,” it added.
Lobbyists for banks and securities firms such as the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association have made similar points. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was cool to the idea when asked at a congressional hearing last month.
…
Even with this former obama economic adviser supporting every liberal/socialist program out there - even he does not think it is going to bring housing back.
So then - WHY DO IT?
—————————————–
Housing Market’s ‘Go-Go Days’ Are a Thing of the Past
David Chalian - Daily Ticker – August 8, 2012
The sluggish economic recovery would certainly get a short-term boost if the housing market picked up a bit of steam, but any notion that a boom in housing alone will be the key to a fully recovered American economy should be eradicated according to former Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee.
“When housing comes back, and I think in many if not most markets in the U.S. we have reached a bottom and you’ve started to see the prices recovering. But when they come back, it’s probably not going to be back to the Go-Go days,” Goolsbee told The Daily Ticker. “It’s just unrealistic. We’ve got 5 million vacant homes in the country and so the thought that we’re going to get substantial construction building more homes, I think it’s going to be several years before that happens, though we might see some relief with the prices starting to go up modestly.”
Goolsbee, who currently serves as a professor at the University of Chicago, also weighed in on a controversial policy proposal getting some attention and consideration by local officials across the country including Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
Mortgage Resolution Partners, a San Francisco-based company, has put forth a proposal where local governments would use eminent domain authority to take ownership of underwater mortgages.
It’s not clear if that would be a legal use of eminent domain, but Goolsbee said it is worth consideration.
“That kind of thing hasn’t been tried before. I’d advise anybody to look at this. In most of these housing policies when you actually sit down and look at the details a lot of them are hard to put into practice. If you are weighing in with eminent domain, I think you just got to be careful about what the spillover effects are going to be on other parts of the housing industry. But we know there $750 billion of negative equity out in the housing market and that’s a huge issue. These people who have debt overhang are not increasing their consumption. They are going to have a hard time coming back while they’re under all that debt.”
Goolsbee also expressed dissatisfaction with FHFA acting director Ed DeMarco’s continued opposition to writing down the principals for underwater homeowners.
“It’s on a strictly business decision they ought to be evaluating whether they can keep more people in their homes and get more payments out of them by writing down their principals somewhat so that they don’t default,” he said. “I find it a little frustrating that the head of Fannie and Freddie is not wanting to think anything other than let’s just hold on to these vacant homes and hopefully the prices will and let’s not consider any of these kind of alternative payment options.”
So then - WHY DO IT?
Duh! Because its what the banksters want.
But forget that, I heard that some union teachers in a city far away from where I live actually make good money and get nice pensions when they retire.
Damn Union Goons!
Why is it that realtors are reluctant to admit their occupation? They seem ashamed of it.
Why is that?
Let’s compare those salaries to CEO pay in America for similarly sized organizations. You know the ones who hand pick their compensation committees and have massive golden parachutes.
Information on 500 of America’s largest companies, income, tax rate, CEO compensation.
NerdWallet
Oh SNAP!
Another evening with Linquine and Clam Sauce
wouldn’t lobster be better?
King crab trumps lobster.
Speaking of which, got into Boston tonight…just had one.
I hear they are just giving them away these days?
Not lobsters.
ft dot com
August 8, 2012 6:46 pm
Americans need to face the harsh truth and pay more tax
By Jared Bernstein
One of the guiding principles of contemporary tax policy in the US is the notion that Americans are terribly overtaxed. Both candidates are running on not raising taxes for the middle classes and Mitt Romney wants to not only make the George W. Bush tax cuts permanent, he wants to cut income tax rates another 20 per cent across the board.
Yet, data from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reveal that, when it comes to federal taxation, US households are less taxed now than 30 years ago, and that is not just a function of the recession. The CBO data began in 1979 when the typical, or median, household paid 19 per cent of their income in federal taxes. In 2009, that share had fallen to 11 per cent.
Both economic and policy changes account for the decline in “effective tax rates”. In recessions, progressive tax systems provide automatic tax cuts as declining incomes push households into lower tax brackets. Middle-income households lost an average $6,000 in market-based income, an 11 per cent decline, between 2007 and 2009, but their federal tax bill fell $2,300, or 24 per cent. Thus their effective tax rate fell from 14 per cent to 11 per cent.
But policy changes also played a significant role and the Bush tax cuts have had a large impact on the fall of tax rates ever since. Over the 1980s and 1990s, the overall effective tax rate fluctuated within a narrow band of 20.2 per cent to 22.7 per cent – lower in the Ronald Reagan years, a bit higher in the Bill Clinton years. But from 2000-07, before the recession took hold, they fell by almost 3 percentage points, equal to about $300bn in revenue, or 2 per cent of gross domestic product.
Policy changes lowered taxes in the recession, too. That’s a perfectly legitimate use of tax cuts, but such cuts are supposed to be temporary and reset once the downturn has passed. Yet, every time a tax cut nears expiration, the deafening cry of “tax increase!” frightens politicians such that today’s tax policy is solidly asymmetric: rates can only go down. That makes it impossible to get on a sane fiscal path.
For Republicans who have signed the Grover Norquist pledge to never raise taxes, the misleading mantra that we are overtaxed serves two purposes. First, the wealthiest households get the biggest income boost from any across-the-board cuts.
…
Why buy stocks now when a fall 2012 crash most likely will wipe out all your gains?
Aug. 9, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EDT
Stock stall, higher rates ahead?
Commentary: Bull and bear think bond boom busted
By Peter Brimelow, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Two turn-calling letters disagree on stocks — but expect higher interest rates.
…
octogenarian veteran Richard Russell’s worrying, in his Dow Theory Letters comment posted after the market close Wednesday, about the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s (DJIA +0.05%) persistent refusal to close above its May peak of 13,279.32.
Coupled with deterioration in the Dow Jones Transportation Average (DJT -0.33%), this causes Russell to suspect an imminent Dow theory sell signal.
He writes: “My conclusion is that the stock market is discounting ahead, discounting something it doesn’t like in the future, which is probably four to six months ahead.
“What could it be? If I had to guess — I’d guess it was consumers suddenly cutting back on their buying. I say this because I don’t get the perception that U.S. consumers have taken the business situation seriously — yet.
“They’ve been hypnotized by the optimistic quarterly earnings of stocks. Europe is in recession, and they will be cutting back on imports — this will hit the earnings of America’s blue chips.
“The bad news will probably hit in the fall. The news will shock and surprise America’s consumers.”
…
If the PPT ever loses control I expect the last few YEARS of gains to be wiped out, not just the last few months.
Like I said the other day, it`s Spring Training in South Florida for tougher gun laws.
Posted: 11:02 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2012
Man charged with attempted murder after knife attack on cab driver in Boynton Beach
By Julius Whigham II
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
BOYNTON BEACH —
A 31-year-old man was arrested Wednesday night after he allegedly attacked a cab driver with a knife while trying to rob him, city police said.
Gregory Neider is facing charges of attempted felony murder and attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, said Stephanie Slater, city police spokeswoman.
The driver, Marcellin Augustin, 56, remained in stable condition at Delray Medical Center late Wednesday, she said. The cuts to his head were deep enough to expose part of his skull, reports said.