January 18, 2013

Bits Bucket for January 18, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here. And check out Chomp, Chomp, Chomp by a regular poster!




RSS feed

284 Comments »

Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 06:53:07

Do You Want To Scare A Baby Boomer?
TEC | 1-17-2013 | Michael Snyder

If you want to frighten Baby Boomers, just show them the list of statistics in this article. The United States is headed for a retirement crisis of unprecedented magnitude, and we are woefully unprepared for it. At this point, more than 10,000 Baby Boomers are reaching the age of 65 every single day, and this will continue to happen for almost the next 20 years.

State and local governments are facing trillions in unfunded pension liabilities. Medicare is facing a 38 trillion dollar shortfall over the next 75 years. The Social Security system is facing a 134 trillion dollar shortfall over the next 75 years. Meanwhile, nearly half of all American workers have less than $10,000 saved for retirement.

2. According to one recent poll, 25 percent of all Americans in the 46 to 64-year-old age bracket have no retirement savings at all.

3. 26 percent of all Americans in the 46 to 64-year-old age bracket have no personal savings whatsoever.

6. A Pew Research survey found that half of all Baby Boomers say that their household financial situations have deteriorated over the past year.

11. According to one recent survey, 70 percent of all American workers expect to continue working once they are “retired”.

12. According to a poll conducted by AARP, 40 percent of all Baby Boomers plan to work “until they drop”.

New research from the AARP also shows that those ages 50 and over are carrying higher balances on their credit cards — $8,278 in 2012 compared to $6,258 for the under-50 population.

15. A study by a law professor at the University of Michigan found that Americans that are 55 years of age or older now account for 20 percent of all bankruptcies in the United States. Back in 2001, they only accounted for 12 percent of all bankruptcies.

16. Between 1991 and 2007 the number of Americans between the ages of 65 and 74 that filed for bankruptcy rose by a staggering 178 percent.

18. In 1945, there were 42 workers for every retiree receiving Social Security benefits. Today, that number has fallen to 2.5 workers, and if you eliminate all government workers, that leaves only 1.6 private sector workers for every retiree receiving Social Security benefits.

24. Medicare is facing unfunded liabilities of more than 38 trillion dollars over the next 75 years. That comes to approximately $328,404 for each and every household in the United States.

28. The state of Illinois has accumulated unfunded pension liabilities of more than 77 billion dollars.

30. According to Northwestern University Professor John Rauh, the latest estimate of the total amount of unfunded pension and healthcare obligations for retirees that state and local governments across the United States have accumulated is 4.4 trillion dollars.

The federal government, our state governments and our local governments are already drowning in debt and we are already spending far more money than we bring in each year. How in the world are we going to make ends meet as our obligations to retirees absolutely skyrocket in the years ahead?

That is something to think about.

Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2013-01-18 06:58:35

Why don’t you all f-fade away (Talkin’ ’bout my generation)
And don’t try to dig what we all s-s-say (Talkin’ ’bout my generation)
I’m not trying to cause a big s-s-sensation (Talkin’ ’bout my generation)
I’m just talkin’ ’bout my g-g-g-generation (Talkin’ ’bout my generation)

Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 07:06:35

Go ask Pete Townshend (age 67) those questions…

 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 08:13:40

“I’m just talkin’ ’bout my g-g-g-generation (Talkin’ ’bout my generation)”

Lol, I watched a recent interview with Roger Daltrey on youtube last evening. Guy looks completely awesome for an old gent. And he’s having a ball.

Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2013-01-18 08:21:42

I cant’ splain.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 08:44:04

But I’ll tell you who hasn’t aged well: Grace Slick.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:47:50

She was hideous at 25.

 
Comment by Bad Chile
2013-01-18 12:15:45

Nor has Kathleen Turner.

“Runkle!”

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 07:20:22

Well AT&T announced today that they are setting aside 10 billion to cover their pension liability. CWA union members will at least have a better retirement than the average worker. Right-to-work laws have helped to gut the retirements of millions of americans.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-01-18 08:14:41

So Bluestar, when is the State of Illinois going to get around to funding its pensions?

Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 08:40:50

When gun violence ends in Chicago.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 09:34:32

They need to raise taxes just like the insurance companies raise premiums. A state VAT would really help.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Purgatory
2013-01-18 13:37:51

That would work only if other states do the same.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-18 23:51:35

In other words, we need more government to pay for all of the additional government. Where have I heard that? Hope you all enjoy mad max.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Montana
2013-01-18 07:24:57

gee who coulda seen it coming.

 
Comment by squad in florida
2013-01-18 07:42:07

Cueing the NAR-scum to pimp about “pent-up” demand.

Pent-up demand for cat food and pill cutters, that is :)

http://www.walmart.com/ip/Latex-Free-Pill-Cutter/10716028

Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 09:05:34

You gotta make those pills last a little longer now.

Federal agents arrest 17 in Boynton Beach accused of being part of multi-state pill mill ring

Posted: 9:23 a.m. Thursday, Jan. 17, 2013

By Alexandra Seltzer

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

After federal agents received a call on their tip line from a concerned pharmacist reporting suspicious prescriptions, federal agents went to work, eventually identifying 45 South Florida residents allegedly responsible for lining the streets with prescription pills and selling them for at least $20 a pop.

Seventeen of those named in the indictment, which is being prosecuted by the Palm Beach County State’s Attorney’s Office, were arrested Thursday throughout the county.

In addition to the 17 arrests, DEA agents working with other law enforcement agencies, including the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office, picked up one gun, about 2 pounds of cocaine and around $7,000 in cash.

The “Drug Scam Operation” had been in the works for 18 months after a Boynton Beach pharmacist in August 2011 called the DEA’s “pill mill” tip line and reported suspicions of prescription fraud.

The group is alleged to have fraudulently obtained around 45,000 oxycodone pills from April 2011 to November 2011, Ro said.

Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 09:26:33

While the brave DEA agents fights the drug war their fellow government employees at the Army Corps of Engineers are cleaning out the wretched human filth that infest our parks and wetlands.

“Army Corps’ Eco-Disaster in Valley; Army Corps homophobia may have prompted destruction of 40 acres of habitat

Facing increasing criticism for bulldozing a cherished bird habitat and wetlands ecosystem spanning 40 football fields — in a city where most wetlands were long ago destroyed — Corps officials insisted the federal flood-control agency had no choice, in part because cruising gay men and homeless campers had flocked there and endangered the public.”

http://www.laweekly.com/2013-01-10/news/sepulveda-wildlife-clearcut-homophobia-army-corps-recriminations/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 10:10:56

Bluestar you are one of my favorite posters. Love that you point out some of this idiocy.

Gay men were endangering the area!

*eye roll*

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 10:23:56

cruising gay men

How do cruising gay men endanger the public? Gay men having anonymous sex in parks is what male sexuality in its essence - without the influence of women - looks like.

I have walked through parks with this kind of scene, and as a woman, never once felt threatened in the least.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 11:41:58

Predators hang out in the parks preying on cruising gay men. The “public safety” concern is for those folks who use the area, not because of them.

And wetlands have a way of becoming wetlands again. I think they just dozed over the cover, not uprooted it.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-18 23:58:17

“I have walked through parks with this kind of scene, and as a woman, never once felt threatened in the least.”

I think they may leave behind used condoms, fecal matter and other misc body excretions. I think they need to take it to a motel or housing unit where nobody will care about their private business…except perhaps the cleaning lady.

 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2013-01-18 08:25:08

not a pot to piss in…but they probably got iphones…at least the 46 year olds.

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:28:56

….. nor a window to throw it out.

Comment by michael
2013-01-18 09:38:42

But hey…they are better off than the generations behind them. Those generations will not only have no retirement but will be saddled with enormous student loans.

Kid I work with is almost 30 and is still sitting on 60K of debt…shouldn’t he be courting a girl and settling down? hell…he can’t afford to.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 09:44:44

so those white folks are shackin up and keeping the debts separate, that means a lot less work for wedding workers

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:16:37

No pot. No window. Can’t afford an adult diaper. Maybe they can wear their parents used diapers?

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:27:56

No pot. No window. Can’t afford an adult diaper.
There’s always the street.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 11:15:01

“Kid I work with is almost 30 and is still sitting on 60K of debt…shouldn’t he be courting a girl and settling down? hell…he can’t afford to.”

Little known fact - if you default on the student debt, SLME (and state higher education authorities) will often sell it to a collector who will then allow it to be settled at a significant discount. I know people who have negotiated 40-50% off. The key is getting everything in writing & paying all at once.

Why would they do this? Because legally it can take years (decades) to college judgments, place liens, get garnishment orders, follow the person each time they move. States don’t usually allow a high % of wages to be garnished. And there are lawyer fees, court fees, overhead costs.

** This is not legal advice, but you might want to let your co-worker know this is a possibility **

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 11:54:05

Look for more of this (searching but not finding a good pun on “jingle mail”) as this decade goes on. Fully expect some sort of HAMP program for student loan debtors, if not outright repayment boycott. After all, they can’t attach your brain, and if enough people choose simply not to work in the above-board economy in order to avoid onorous loan payments, the nation’s tax base will crumble.

There is certainly a moral precedint for a jubilee, but it would likely benefit the same gene pool that benefited from the mortgage debacle. Once again, those who paid by the rules will get skewered.

 
Comment by michael
2013-01-18 12:06:16

+1

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:01:14

“There’s always the street.”

Only in San Francisco.

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 08:28:25

Hey fruitcake, I note that you selectively left out this little blurb:

——
So what is the solution? Well, one influential organization of business executives says that the solution is to make Americans wait longer for retirement.

[The Business Roundtable] is pushing a plan to gradually increase the full retirement age to 70 for both Social Security and Medicare and to partially privatize the health insurance program for older Americans. …The Business Roundtable’s plan would protect those 55 and older from cuts but younger workers would face significant changes. The plan unveiled Wednesday would result in smaller annual benefit increases for all Social Security recipients. Initial benefits for wealthy retirees would also be smaller…

But considering the fact that there aren’t nearly enough jobs for all Americans already, perhaps that is not such a great idea. If we expect Americans to work longer, then we are going to need our economy to start producing a lot more good jobs than it is producing right now.
————–

Good on Michael Snyder for at least mentioning that the real problem is lack of jobs. At least he stops short of suggesting tax cuts to create jobs. :roll: He then asks for possible solutions in the comment section.

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:31:36

Speaking of not having two dimes to rub together………..

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:02:33

burn.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:05:57

He then asks for possible solutions in the comment section.
Easy. Plunge the vast majority into real poverty. The ensuing die-off will obviate most all the other issues.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 09:11:44

And this great fantastic news for the amerikkkan woika:

Obama Jobs Council hits 1 year without official meeting

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/01/obama-jobs-council-hits-year-without-official-meeting-154524.html

Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:55:12

Good to see you know how to read drudgereport and cut/paste the link!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 10:02:39

Glad to know how serious they take the jobs situation

 
Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 18:06:28

That jobs council is the one that is led by Jeffrey Immelt of “outsource and not pay tax” GE.

The less often they meet, the better.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:03:49

“The less often they meet, the better.”

Spoken like a true kool-aid drinker.

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 08:46:44

11. According to one recent survey, 70 percent of all American workers expect to continue working once they are “retired”.

At least they’re realistic. It used to be that they just assumed they would “retire”.

The real crisis is going to be in nursing homes. My in-laws have Alzheimer’s and Lewy body Dementia. They’re well off (he’s a former executive with pensions coming out of his ears) and they live in a really nice “memory care” facility. My brother-in-law, who has power of attorney for them, is becoming worried that they will exhaust their savings before they pass away. If that happens they will have to move them somewhere else.

So, if this is a problem for a couple with over $100K in retirement income, what’s going to happen when more and more waves of pensionless boomers get to that point? Will they get shipped out to nursing homes in the third world?

Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 08:55:26

Or maybe….

They will do what mankind has done for thousands of years.

The FAMILY will take care of their own instead of trying to ship them off for the government to care of…

But, but , but…

I partied all my life and spent every dime on myself.

I saved nothing and had no kids (because kids are expensive and take alot of time from partying).

So someone else needs to take care of me…

Comment by polly
2013-01-18 09:08:35

Doesn’t work too well when all the adult members of their family are working full time, bananas. And taking care of a person with severe dementia in a regular house is a full time job.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:21:08

And taking care of a person with severe dementia in a regular house is a full time job.
Really, caring for the severely demented is more like 2 to 3 full time jobs, a 24×7x365 responsibility. Individual caregivers need to sleep, rest, eat, wash, change clothes, stuff like that, or else their health will collapse. That is why institutions were created with round-the-clock staffing, organized on shifts.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:32:35

And taking care of a person with severe dementia in a regular house is a full time job.

Exactly, it’s far worse than caring for a toddler. FAR WORSE. It’s really shocking to see what has happened to my in laws, who are basically kept prisoner in the home.

In the old days, before modern medicine, grandma and grandpa typically died before reaching this stage. And if they did, they were locked up in nasty, dirty institutions.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:40:24

if they did, they were locked up in nasty, dirty institutions.
Then those inmates tended to die in very short order also. Especially in hot weather.
Even physicians tend to lack awareness of how sensitive the elderly are to hot weather.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:43:07

It’s really shocking to see what has happened to my in laws
It’s only shocking for those lacking experience with this. Medical personnel should be entirely aware of these long-term problems, but then who cares to ask their opinion?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-01-18 10:09:01

Even physicians tend to lack awareness of how sensitive the elderly are to hot weather.

Yet they all love to live in Florida and Arizona. What could possibly go wrong?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 10:11:15

The staff at the memory care center have the patience of a Saint. I doubt I could do their job.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:15:45

Yet they all love to live in Florida and Arizona.
That only happened after A/C became widely used. Pray that the grid never goes down there.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:22:13

Heat & the elderly — I forgot to mention. A great many of the casualties of Katrina in New Orleans were elderly people suddenly exposed to lack of A/C for days. They did not die of wind or flooding damage, but from the lack of A/C when they were not promptly evacuated.
My sister has been living in Albuquerque for 15 years. She turns 71 in 2 months. She is about to move back to OH. ABQ’s heat, glare and wildfires going on for weeks at a time combined with the culturally ingrained incompetence there, finally got too much for her. She has A/C in her home and her car, but it is finally too much for her.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-01-18 10:40:55

Determining the best or worse places to live for retirement is pretty subjected but Forbes and Money magazine considers Albuquerque one of the best places:
http://www.cabq.gov/mayor/news/forbes-albuquerque-in-top-5-cities-to-retire

My mother loves to visit but there is no way I can get her to move from Burlington, Vermont. Of course, Burlington is a city that oftens makes the best list for small cities, along with the liberal circuit cities of Missoula, Sante Fe, Flagstaff etc.

I love the history of the area and I can go to places such as the Luna Mansion and eat a meal which is superior to ones I have had at places at the Hotel Del Coronado and pay less than half the price.

 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-01-18 10:41:31

But living elderly constantly complain that cold weather causes joint pain. I think when you get old, the temp in general is your enemy. That’s why Florida originally got so popular for the winter.

 
 
Comment by rms
2013-01-18 09:09:37

“The FAMILY will take care of their own instead of trying to ship them off for the government to care of…”

That worked until the industrial revolution, IIRC.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 09:13:17

That worked until socialists and huge tax and spend governments took over, IIRC.

That worked until the industrial revolution, IIRC.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:15:14

The FAMILY will take care of their own instead of trying to ship them off for the government to care of…
Another complicating factor was an increasing lifespan. Quite a few of my mother’s contemporaries survived childhood, to regularly appear in census records and family photos into their mid-twenties. These doomed youths often living with in-laws and cousins, most likely providing child and elder care. They died before they could have children, but after helping other children survive.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 11:35:41

Another complicating factor was an increasing lifespan.

Indeed. Both of my parents died in their 70’s, before they lost their marbles. I was hard to see my mother consumed by emphysema, but she was lucid enough to decide on her own that she didn’t want to live 24/7 on a ventilator and went into hospice instead, and died a week later.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 12:30:31

Hope I die before I get old
Talking ’bout my generation.

Prescience?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-01-18 12:39:26

“The FAMILY will take care of their own instead of trying to ship them off for the government to care of…”

That worked until the industrial revolution, IIRC.

It probably worked OK until the 1970s. It was generally the women of the family who take care of those needed the care. Once the era of the housewife came to an end in the ’70s, those women no longer had the time to provide the care.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-01-18 14:11:28

“The FAMILY will take care of their own instead of trying to ship them off for the government to care of…””

It NEVER worked in the history of mankind. The older and more infirm, the more likely they were die very quickly.

Those who could take of them did. But since most of mankind has alwsy been the 99%’s, that didn’t work either no matter how much you cared.

It has truly only been in the last few decades that ANY kind of safety and oversight and at least halfway well run instituions have been available to the masses.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 09:16:26

This was was the whole idea behind 2 family houses….i grew up in an area of them or finished basements, MIL apartments…this is what was expected of you.

The FAMILY will take care of their own instead of trying to ship them off for the government to care of…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:37:51

i grew up in an area of them or finished basements, MIL apartments…this is what was expected of you.
A cousin of mine’s family actually took on the responsibility of caring for a maiden lady, now age 92. This elder had cared for her uncle full-time until he died age 105. She inherited his farm, which became worth a great deal as the area gentrified and became a retirement haven for the very well-off. She sold off portions of her land to pay her expenses, and in her old age formed an agreement to give my cousin what was left in return for lifetime care. My cousin built a special wing on the house she provided, to care for her when that ultimately became necessary. He dropped dead at age 58. I would not be surprised if she outlives some of his children. I am sorry I actually told them that, their faces dropped.
I’ve done some French Canadian genealogy & found several instances of agreements like this dating back to the 1700’s, for elders who had no surviving descendants, but who had assets.

 
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 12:07:26

You can’t take care of a person with severe dementia in a two family home or a mother-in-law apartment. That is for fully functioning relatives who need help with the shopping and/or being taken to doctors appointments and maybe some help with cooking and cleaning. Once it goes beyond that (help with bathing, toileting, wandering, eating, etc.) you can’t have them in a separate space.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:38:19

you can’t have them in a separate space.
You can with round-the-clock help, that is the basic problem I meant.

 
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 14:34:42

tresho,

My comment was in reaction to dj’s absurd suggestion that you put relatives with severe dementia into the other half of a two family house or a mother-in-law apartment. Not a reaction to you.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 14:59:43

no polly I never said severe dementia…..just old age….and why do we keep these people alive anyway?

I know you dont kill the cash cow….but when is enough.. enough?

 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:28:47

So someone else needs to take care of me…
Doctors used to call pneumonia ‘the old man’s friend.’ Pneumonia was often an old and decrepit patient’s last illness, and in fact is still often found on autopsy in such cases even if not identified by the caregiver. Antibiotics & other medical interventions can now stave off several incidences of pneumonia, increasing a person’s lifespan by several years as other disabilities & ailments worsen. Eventually the interacting ailments are more than any physician can treat, the end becomes like a collapsing house of cards.
Pneumonia also used to take the much younger and healthier. Antibiotics can save these lives, allowing them to live on for decades in good health. See my other comment about the die-off of young adults born in the early 1900’s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:46:26

Pneumonia was often an old and decrepit patient’s last illness

It’s what did my father in after his stroke.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:56:35

It’s what did my father in after his stroke.
Also happened to my uncle when he was 92. He was living fully independently up to his stroke. His stroke was not that severe either. The complicating factor was that he also had a severe swallowing disorder, he needed to sit bolt upright & swallow very carefully otherwise food would get stuck in his throat. This worked OK until his stroke, then he could no longer keep from inhaling his food. He lasted 2 1/2 weeks before pneumonia (probably from inhaling food) killed him.
That is what I meant by the ‘house of cards’ analogy.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:35:22

I partied all my life and spent every dime on myself.

I saved nothing and had no kids (because kids are expensive and take alot of time from partying).

So someone else needs to take care of me…

You are so totally missing the point, dude. My in-laws saved a ton (over 500K), have about $140K in retirement income and THEY MIGHT RUN OUT OF MONEY.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:47:10

THEY MIGHT RUN OUT OF MONEY.
The amount cited is chump change for a couple of elders who need dementia care, each for 10 years. $1.5 million would be a safer endowment in that scenario.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 10:17:38

They probably would have had the 1.5 mill had they lived in the Bay Area (from selling the house they bought when they were still cheap) instead of flyover. Plus being from the pension generation, they didn’t save all that much. But still, they have more than probably 90% of their contemporaries and we are facing the possibility of having to eventually move them to someplace cheaper.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:24:05

they have more than probably 90% of their contemporaries and we are facing the possibility of having to eventually move them to someplace cheaper.
Yup. I pity those less well off who are up against dementia &/or other severe disabilities.

 
Comment by Kirisdad
2013-01-18 13:41:53

Colo, is that 140k per year in retirement income ?or are you saying they have/had 640K in cash assets? hard to believe they would run out of money w/ 140k in income as well as savings.

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-01-18 14:16:00

One person can easily blow through $100k (or more) per year on long-term care. Multiply that by 2. It isn’t hard to believe at all.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 17:47:51

It’s income. He was an executive before the days of the “crazy money”

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 12:03:05

Public health policy will change to provide for more in-home caregivers — lucky ducky jobs for the one adult kid in the family who never quite got it together and makes the bulk of their living by drawing SSI/UE.

Many low-income folks where I live supplement their crappy wages by having the black sheep who’s home watching TV and eating potato chips all day anyway baby-sit Mom for $8 an hour. And travelling LVNs and perfusionists are a lot cheaper than in-facility care. As is hospice when it all gets to be too much for them to handle.

Look for more of this.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:39:41

black sheep who’s home watching TV and eating potato chips all day anyway baby-sit Mom for $8 an hour.
You left out the part about the sheep’s chain-smoking all day while his emphysematous mother suffocates. Been there, seen that.

 
 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-01-18 12:53:56

You obviously have no idea what it’s like to try to care for a severely demented elderly person, 2b. My own father is now in a care facility since it became obvious that my sister and BIL were unable to provide the 24/7 supervision he needed. We opted for a licensed facility rather than taking a chance on in-home care and all its attendant headaches. There is no happy ending apart from death in these situations. Never again will I criticize anyone who makes the decision to ship Mom or Dad off to the ‘home’.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:59:09

Never again will I criticize anyone who makes the decision to ship Mom or Dad off to the ‘home’.
Only an ignorant person would criticize that decision under the circumstances you have just described. Most people have no idea and no empathy for what family caregivers can go up against.
– Then there are those who foolishly promise their elders they will never send them to a nursing home. This is worse than promising a pension.

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-01-18 14:11:57

Tresho, my own sister and I made that promise, at least to each other. “No nursing homes!” we said. Yet here we are. People say things like that when they don’t know what the reality will be some day.

 
 
Comment by CeeCee
2013-01-18 13:41:18

I’m confused why children are somehow obligated to take care of their parents, anyways. I can see if you have good parents, but the ones who feel entitled to it tend to be crappy, anyways.

I work as a caregiver. I also do live in work, and many times I have gone days without sleep. There are many patients with dementia that won’t sleep for 3 or 4 days, and they become increasingly aggressive as time goes on. Some of them are just plain sad. They lost all of who they once were, and become severely abusive to you. Some of them become completely bedridden, so you have to bathe them, change them (every 2 hours), feed them (a lot of them through G-tubes), figure out a way to give them their medicine (good luck, because they are non compliant), and take severely violent behavior while doing all of these basic tasks. God forbid you have a person in the late stages who can still walk and is over 200 pounds.

In short, I do not blame people for not wanting to take care of their parents even if they could. Actually, even if you wanted to, it would be emotional suicide if you did it alone, to the point where you just give up and throw them in a home. And even then, there are many suicidal elderly people in nursing homes. The real issue is keeping someone alive when their quality of life is gone and they just want to pass.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 15:05:12

CeeCee that patient is a CASH COW…they die you dont have a job…and multiply that by tens, maybe hundreds of thousands a year and lots of people will lose their jobs

so keeping them alive at all costs is a jobs program, I wish they would legalize gay marriage that would be a good jobs program for dj’s……

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 15:53:44

CeeCee,
I pray I will find a personal assistant as thoughtful and articulate as you are if the time comes for me to take one on. (I’d like to think that I’d check out before it comes to that, but one never knows….)

Good on you, girl, you actually give me hope.

 
 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2013-01-18 15:55:49

My father has dementia, limited lung function, 30% kidney failure, arthritis, and vertigo from low blood pressure. He takes about a dozen different medications, spaced out 3 times a day.
My mother has arthritis, a bad back, a bad shoulder and both of them get around with walkers.
After losing my job in 2009, I was on unemployment for about a year with no luck in the marketplace. About 6 months later, surgery for Dad and rehab. They said he needed 24 hour care.

Both my brother and I live in the same town. Our jobs: Parent Care. Day on. Day off. We both are confined to quarters(i.e. stuck in town) and have been so for about 2 years. It’s not fun. It’s very tiresome. No vacations. No sick days.
Some mornings I get on-line. Most times I’m too groggy before Noon. Old people with dementia don’t usually sleep well, either. Most people won’t understand the world of aged demented parents until it happens to them. The usual solution is adult-living facilities.
It sure is good that Medicare is taking care of all this.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 18:12:28

dio i keep asking when is enough… enough?

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 18:20:22

We should all be so lucky as to have a child like you, Dio.
Hugs.

 
Comment by rms
2013-01-18 21:52:40

“It sure is good that Medicare is taking care of all this.”

Sounds to me like you and your brother are pulling down the lion’s share of the work. What does Medicare provide in this situation?

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-19 00:17:20

What does Medicare provide in this situation?
Walker(s), all those medications, surgery & rehab fees.

 
 
 
Comment by In Purgatory
2013-01-18 09:01:56

Where’s the European heat wave when you need one?

 
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 09:06:40

$100K per year of retirement income is only $274 a day. $250 a day is what you can expect to pay for good long term care per day per person in a high cost state like MA or NY. $200 for a medium cost one. If they don’t have long term care insurance, $100K of income per year is severely underfunded for long term care for two people at once. And yes, the implications of this are pretty scarey.

A lot of couples don’t end up both needing the care at the same time. Usually the woman takes care of the man for a substantial amount of the time that he needs assistance or even until he dies. That is just an average, but it is the most common situation since women live longer and are usually the younger partner.

Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:17:27

Very few men wind up needing this kind of care.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:39:24

I don’t know, I see a lot of men at the “memory care center”.

Usually the woman takes care of the man for a substantial amount of the time that he needs assistance or even until he dies

That’s kind of what happened. My FIL was affected first (Alzheimer’s). His wife looked after him for a few years, but eventually wasn’t able to continue as she came down with Dementia. He went to the memory care center first two years ago and she just joined him two months ago. Her memory is so messed up that she insists that she’s only “visiting”.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:50:55

Her memory is so messed up that she insists that she’s only “visiting”.
That may actually be a blessing. It’s harder to suffer when you can’t remember HOW LONG you’ve been suffering. Think about the logic of that.
IMO, families and friends of the demented often suffer more seeing the wreckage of a once vibrant personality as they mourn a loss that is so painful to them. The demented may know they’ve lost something, but that feeling of loss is constantly renewed, seems like it just happened to them.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 09:29:31

Polly…where is Dr Kevorkian when you need him?

We are so against people making a choice as to their end of life care, or death.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 09:55:03

Go ahead, dj. Why don’t you start a 501(c)(4) organization to lobby the government to make assisted suicide legal in all the states? I can even point you in the direction of the right forms you need to file, state and ferderal. The organization won’t have to pay taxes, but contributions won’t be deductible either.

Start raising the money now. It will cost you a few hundred bucks to get started.

 
Comment by Montana
2013-01-18 10:07:02

So what if people don’t choose death for themselves? What then? Bravado is easy when you’re not staring death in the face.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-01-18 10:46:28

Also don’t use a gun. Suicide is supported by many on the left until you use a gun and then it becomes a bad thing.

 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 11:20:02

Hunter S. Thompson was an inspiration to the left and he used a gun. I didn’t hear any outrage from the left about that suicide.

“No More Games. No More Bombs. No More Walking. No More Fun. No More Swimming. 67. That is 17 years past 50. 17 more than I needed or wanted. Boring. I am always bitchy. No Fun — for anybody. 67. You are getting Greedy. Act your old age. Relax — This won’t hurt”

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-01-18 11:32:39

Suicide by gun is messy, and so disturbing for family members who have to deal with the aftermath.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-01-18 11:41:01

Yeah, if you’re going to do that, go out in the forest or a field somewhere where nobody will have to clean it up.

 
Comment by Montana
2013-01-18 14:45:36

Haha, Hunter S. was smart. How awful to have had that plan all along, but suddenly lose the ability to carry it out.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-01-18 09:37:43

“At this point, more than 10,000 Baby Boomers are reaching the age of 65 every single day, and this will continue to happen for almost the next 20 years.”

A sizable majority of this cohort owns homes which will go back on the U.S. housing market over the next two decades, keeping a tightly-sealed lid on future price appreciation in the single-family home market.

The fact that the home construction industry has been artificially stimulated into firing up their bulldozers and building more McMansions will only serve to exacerbate the supply glut that lies in store.

Maybe the REIC can hide these homes in shadow inventory forever; time will tell!

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:41:15

Or they might pass the house down to their Lucky Ducky kids.

Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 10:01:24

pretty much that’s what happening where i grew up, 3 HS friends moved back home to take care of mom, now live there since the house is paid for and the $5-6000 yr in taxes they can cover with that lucky ducky job.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 09:42:53

This is the black swan. The massive excess boomer inventory of 35 MILLION houses just starting to empty combined with the current excess inventory of 20 MILLION units will keep prices falling for decades.

Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 12:08:53

No Black Swan, it’s been predicted for years. But public policy chose to ignore the demographic in pursuit of the quick profit.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:41:59

it’s been predicted for years And accurately predicted as it is turning out. But, the public don’t do math.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-01-18 14:42:30

Where should I tell my parents to move? They were born in ‘46 (the very front end of the baby boom–they turn 67 this year), and by your math, they should now be exiting their house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-01-18 15:18:49

http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/planning-to-retire/2010/06/23/10-things-retirees-are-doing-without

“You can generally get by with less space once your children leave home. Some 7 percent of retirees are considering downsizing to a smaller home.”

http://www.movewithnasi.com/retireesdownsize.html

“Only a minority of people make a deliberate decision to downsize, says Olivia S. Mitchell, executive director of the Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Security at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Rather, moves are more often motivated by “a shock, like the death of a spouse,” she says.”

http://www.retirement-cafe.com/Fears-about-Retirement.html

“About 10 percent of retirees said they no longer can afford do keep their primary residence.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/09/us-usa-retirees-idUSBRE82714G20120309

“65 percent of homeowners over age 65 were mortgage-free in 2009, according to the Census Bureau.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 23:40:45

Hey rental pimp. You’re parents are going to be in a box in the ground soon. It’s the same place the other 70 million boomers are going soon.

Smarten up.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:10:47

31. 100% of those from 46-64 think their house funds their retirement in some strange way.

Comment by WT Economist
2013-01-18 11:14:46

It does, or at least it used to.

If you pay it off, you don’t have to pay rent or a mortgage. Somehow people forgot about the paying it off part.

By the way, the first half of the baby boom had a radically different experience than the second half, and I’d be those 44 to 54 are worse off by all these measures than those who went before. They have been at each prior phase of life, and will be in old age.

And those under 45 are worse off still.

 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2013-01-18 07:10:13

It is quite shocking how many people have cash to buy homes outright these days especially CA. I wonder if they are being backed by hard money lenders?

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-01-18 11:01:23

If they are buying them as fix-and-flips, yes.

If they are buying them as buy-and-hold rentals, or owner occupied, they’re making a huge mistake and those places will be back on the market in a year or so.

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-01-18 14:38:44

“If they are buying them as fix-and-flips, yes.”

Most of what I’ve seen for fix/flips actually have their cash from equity investors. Hard money typically requires some paperwork to close (title policy, appraisal, etc.), lots of fix/flip are acquired at auction, with no time to get the paperwork done. Moreover, hard-money won’t lend you 100%, but most typically 50-60%…there needs to be lots of cash even with hard money.

If the fix/flip is buying a short-sale or REO, there would likely be time to get the paperwork done, and could be sourced with hard money as a part of the capital source, but as noted above, unlikely to be 100%.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 07:11:55

Taxes and spending.

It is what makes a country great!

———————————-

Liberals have no shame at all
Boston Herald | January 18, 2013 | Michael Graham

After six years of exploding state spending and steady tax hikes, is Gov. Deval Patrick even a little embarrassed about pushing a $2.8 billion-per-year income and business tax increase? Not a bit.

President Obama, having jacked up the debt by almost 60 percent in just four years announces it’s time to simply get rid of any ceiling on the debt because what we need is more spending.

Less than a week after a $620 billion tax hike, Democrats in Washington were announcing that it was time for . . . more tax hikes. Nancy Pelosi didn’t even blink (assuming that’s still anatomically possible) when she said, “There’s more to do on the revenue side.”

To paraphrase Joseph Welch to U.S. Sen. Joseph
McCarthy — have you liberals no shame?

In 2011, Patrick increased the budget by 10 percent — $3 billion — in a single year.

Last year, he raised it another $2 billion to $32.5 billion, and he is likely to spend around $35 billion next year.

Many people were aghast when they heard Patrick’s call for nearly $2 billion in net new taxes. The Herald editorial page spoke for most taxpayers yesterday when it declared “Governor, this is WAR!”

But when you keep adding billions in new spending, you need billions in new taxes to pay for it — particularly when Massachusetts has more debt per capita than nearly any other state.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 08:10:08

Well now, I think this country is governed by the most incredible financial. geniuses. ever. Think about it: tax breaks for the rich and for big biz (and all sorts of other loopholes), benefits and public services for masses of low and no-income, jobs outsourced and offshored for the folks in the middle, debt ceilings raised to the moon. And it just keeps on going! It’s a miracle!

Lol, wasn’t Patrick on the board of Ameriquest?

I predict a Massodus. At least, if I was some middle class grunt, or someone with employee status of any sort, I’d get the snot outta Mass as fast as I could.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:27:11

The problem with fleeing places like Mass is that the other places (the cheap ones) don’t have jobs. As Northeastemer has pointed out, techies in his neck of the woods get raises and bonuses every year, while in flyover those are as rare as a Republican who thinks we should just get out of the middle east.

Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:58:48

The problem with fleeing places like Mass is that the other places (the cheap ones) don’t have jobs.
d—-d reality!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 13:37:02

If cheap places had jobs, they wouldn’t be cheap.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 14:41:09

This.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 15:25:28

If cheap places had jobs, they wouldn’t be cheap.

That’s why rents are not falling in places with jobs.

The Bad News: As Suspected, Rental Rates Have Increased Dramatically Over the Past Year

The bottom line: the average rental apartment listing price (in SF) has doubled year over year (Q1 2011 vs. Q1 2012) in some neighborhoods; increased dramatically in most.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 23:43:29

The bottom line?

The bottom line is you’re posting junk because it fits into your fantasy narrative.

Nice try though.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:18:33

Better buy a house before they all get snapped up.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 08:01:38

“Underwater dwellers”

“You did have this kind of asset, only now it’s a liability,” said Chris Gahlsdorf. “There’s more equity in my paid-off car in the driveway.”

Housing crash leaves a generation of young homeowners underwater: Diminished expectations

By Elliot Njus, The Oregonian The Oregonian
December 02, 2012 at 11:00 AM

Chris and Katy Gahlsdorf bought a house the year they got married. They thought, as young couples had for generations, that buying a home was the financially responsible thing to do and would provide security for their future.

That was 2007. Within a year, home values in Oregon were in free-fall.

The house still has its original, drafty 1950s windows and a cramped kitchen with a jungle-green tiled floor. The couple updated the home’s wiring and added a dryer vent upon moving in, but other improvements went on the to-do list to revisit once they had built up some equity.

That equity never came, and now there’s no road map out of the house for years to come.

Underwater dwellers

An analysis by Zillow — whose estimates of negative equity tend to be higher than other research firms — found 47.8 percent of metro mortgage holders under 40 are underwater. The rate for homeowners above 40 is 24.1 percent.

Put another way:

“You did have this kind of asset, only now it’s a liability,” said Chris Gahlsdorf. “There’s more equity in my paid-off car in the driveway.”

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/12/housing_crash_leaves_a_generat.html - 87k

Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 08:15:06

Suzanne and Century 21 - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcTjhXSmnmc - 150k -

 
Comment by squad in florida
2013-01-18 08:33:03

From the article … negative equity peaks among age 30-34

Cueing up “Happiness In Slavery” by Nine Inch Nails

LOOSERS!

Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 08:36:01

what brings you to our little corner of the world?

Comment by squad in florida
2013-01-18 09:43:21

We are in St Pete for a Justice For Trayvon® conference over the MLK holiday weekend. Watching the dolphins out in the bay is rather nice after -5F temperatures last weekend.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 12:14:14

Perfect sqaud:

Mr. President, Chicago’s Gun Victims Need You Now

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/01/18/mr_president_chicagos_gun_victims_need_you_now.html

Do forget trayvon was transitioning from a cute kid to a gangsta thug, ( all his middle finger gang signs pix are off FB)….and it was that thug that confronted zimmerman….

 
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-01-18 09:10:51

I prefer “Closer”…

 
 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:46:32

Oregon is a mess. Massive housing inventory and cratering demand while new spec inventory is added everyday.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 08:50:12

Hmmm…

Did you get a zero down, 120% equity, no doc loan guaranteed by the government for that car?

Did you feel you had to get on the “car ladder” no matter what the cost?

Did the car salesmen promise you that “car values” always go up?

Were illegal strawberry pickers buying $100,000 Mercedes with no money down?

Funny - the more a government STAYS out of a market (aside from prosecuting fraud and enforcing generally accepted accounting standards), the more affordable and sane that market becomes.

Like the housing market - pre-1990

“You did have this kind of asset, only now it’s a liability,” said Chris Gahlsdorf. “There’s more equity in my paid-off car in the driveway.”

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:23:32

Actually, new and used car prices are at all time highs. A well equipped compact (say a Focus/Civic/Corolla/Cruze/etc.) Runs in the low 20’s. A vanilla family sized car will set you back 30K. A nice SUV can run 40K or more.

Of course, this is an apples and oranges comparison. Ordinary cars have never appreciated, unlike houses. They aren’t considered investments, which is what drove the housing bubble, the belief that an easy killing could be made.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-01-18 10:33:30

Wrong again, dude.

Someone pulled the old “identity theft” plan, and used my deceased brother-in-law’s info to buy a $40K plus F series Ford truck with ZERO money down in 2006.

The government had absolutely nothing to do with the decision to watch a $40K truck disappear into the sunset, on just a (fake) signature.

 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-01-18 11:29:11

They thought, as young couples had for generations, that buying a home was the financially responsible thing to do and would provide security for their future.

But WHY? If you can’t answer the question of WHY it was the “financially responsible thing to do” you have no business buying a loan, er…I mean…a home.

 
Comment by BetterRenter
2013-01-18 13:25:14

Chris and Katy Gahlsdorf bought a house the year they got married. They thought, as young couples had for generations, that buying a home was the financially responsible thing to do and would provide security for their future. [...] That equity never came, and now there’s no road map out of the house for years to come.

Born flippers. The perversity of the bubble is built right into the language. Emerging families built homes by STAYING PUT. That’s what really built security and equity. It’s like you can’t even say that in modern reporting language. All you can do when you’re a reporter is repeat the same bubble language.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-01-18 15:24:40

And without job security, there is no “staying put”.

 
 
 
Comment by mikeinbend
2013-01-18 08:05:29

Prineville as well as the rest of Central Oregon are looking forward to a continued recovery of the Real Estate Market in 2013. We have seen prices rise slightly each month for the last 6 months. This is in part because we experienced a very low inventory of properties for sale in 2012. As a resut we have seen and continue to see multiple offers on properties, which in turn drives the prices up. We are also seeing a lot more CASH Buyers jumping into the market. Bare land is selling again too. People are looking to buy land now while the prices and interest rates are low, and plan to build later when they retire. Prineville sold 18 more lots in 2012 than in 2007. Bend sold just 2 lots under their 2007 record. If it’s priced well it won’t stay on the maket long!

Not my words, but I will be looking to sell this spring as I would like to get out before prices begin to fall again.

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:20:12

If you think prices are low now, you’re going to be shocked over the coming years.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 08:48:43

Uh, he said was planning on selling this spring.

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:56:28

That’s great. Get what you can now because its going to be less later for years to come.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:29:38

65% less, to be exact.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 09:35:24

Considering how massively inflated prices of existing housing is, you’re fairly accurate JoeSmith.

 
 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-01-18 16:46:15

Not my words, but I will be looking to sell this spring as I would like to get out before prices begin to fall again.”

The trick is you don’t know when RE will peak and if RE will fall or just stall.

Not saying you have a bad plan.

I am watching interest rates. I figure if rates head up and the FED can’t fight it we are in real trouble. That could bring on more deflation in rate sensitive assets.

Anyway Good Luck

 
 
Comment by Brett
2013-01-18 08:13:35

After the lay offs, I got worse than expected rent news.

My rent is going up from $1675 to $1899… I just received the 30-day notice by landlord.

I spent a few hours yesterday looking at properties around the same area (downtown / central Austin), and the situation isn’t much different.

There are 4 or 5 active 1-bedroom condos under $350k. I don’t wanna pay that much.

There are two condos about 2-3 miles away from my current place for sale for around $160k. Nice amenities.

Condo #1 is close to the university and it was built in the 80s. Non-warrantable because 40% of all units are investors.

Condo #2 is closer to my work and it was built in 2008. Really nice amenities and I would put an offer on it, but it’s not warrantable (30% investors) or FHA approved.

I read non-warrantable loans require a higher down payment, which isn’t an issue, but what bothers is the apparent higher interest rate lenders charge on them due to the higher risk.

Anyone has any feedback or experience on non-warrantable loans?

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 08:21:31

Why buy when your rent is half the monthly cost of buying?

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 08:53:06

If his rent is $1899 then its about the same. Of course, there is always the risk of getting stucco.

Of course, he could move a few miles from downtown and rent a condo for less. But that wouldn’t be cool or hip.

Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:11:15

Condos seem particularly bad as a long term shelter plan because there often aren’t strong restrictions against renting them out… so if other condo owners can’t sell, they will rent out and the place could take on a completely different character over time.

Secondly, condo assessments and fees. The average rube doesn’t know what they’re getting into.

Third, when places aren’t FHA approved or warrantable, it’s a red flag. Often it means the property values have dropped or there are a lot of defaults/foreclosures in the building.

Fourth, is this guy sure he’ll want to live in a condo for 10, 20, 30 yrs? What if he gets a 2nd car and there aren’t available parking spots? What if he gets married/has kids? Are you going to live in a condo with teens one day? What if a family member has to move in with you (parents, for example)? Would it be uncomfortable/lack of space? Would it even be allowed?

I could go on and on, but the more savvy people here can fill in the blanks for themselves.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2013-01-18 16:47:40

correct condos suck

 
 
Comment by Brett
2013-01-18 09:29:19

I could move 2/3 miles from downtown and you’re still paying 1300-1400 for a decent place
You could also move to the middle if nowhere or sleep under the bridge
Some of us actually enjoy having certain quality of life besides sitting in front of a computer, playing in the yard or sitting in the couch

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-01-18 10:39:36

“Quality of life” ……how quaint. :)

“….sitting in front of a computer, playing in the yard, or sitting in the couch.”

You forgot “eating rice and beans, and not owning a cellphone”

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-01-18 11:42:22

Seems like a reasonable tradeoff to save 500-600 dollars a month on rent and still be within easy driving distance, or even a bike ride, from where the fun is.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 11:44:20

How much time do you really spend clubbing? That’s why you want to live downtown, right?

 
Comment by Inflation vs. Deflation
2013-01-18 11:45:30

Or worse…move into Old West Austin.
I used to live here –>
http://tinyurl.com/a9e896r
2 miles from downtown… but $22K for taxes for a 2688sf 3-2 (nice place, but). I sold this in the mid-1990s…taxes then were $6K.

 
 
 
Comment by Brett
2013-01-18 09:20:16

It is not. I am sorry you live in the middle of nowhere, but the rents are sky high in Austin and buying is CHEAPER than renting at the current rents

Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:25:38

Is it cheaper if you factor in condo fees, transaction costs (fees, taxes), property insurance, property taxes, maintenance, etc?

Does this hold true if you only live there 5 or 6 yrs (and remember, transaction costs when it comes time to sell as well)?

Have you figured out why the building isn’t FHA approved? (These things don’t happen randomly, usually their are strong incentives to be FHA approved bc you can get more money out of potential buyers)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 09:29:11

‘Is it cheaper if you factor in condo fees, transaction costs (fees, taxes), property insurance, property taxes, maintenance, etc?’

Of course its not. Renting is a fraction of the cost of buying…… so long as you’re using honest math.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:42:30

I prefer to let him draw the conclusion. If he decides to buy and he plans on living there 30 yrs plus and doesn’t mind what happens to the building during that time… *shrug*… that’s his decision.

I just lack sympathy when people can’t unload their place (at their desired price) or bemoan the changes in a condo over time. Ummm… this is predictable. The smart people are the ones who build the condo and then sell it. And they’re long gone by that time, what do they care if the place becomes less desirable/worn out or if people can’t sell used units at inflated prices??!

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 09:47:52

‘The smart people are the ones who build the condo and then sell it.’

Now we’re getting somewhere.This is a nugget of truth.

The profit in housing is made when it is built and sold to the end user/buyer. The losses begin accruing for the buyer from that day forward.

 
Comment by Brett
2013-01-18 10:02:42

Actually, it is. A similar unit to the one I’m renting sold for $270k recently.
Grab a chula for and try it.
20%
3.5% interest
6k Taxes
250 in HOA fees (includes common insurance, maintenance of common areas, security guards, etc)
$600 home insurance/ year

$1770 a month!!!!

Less than $1900

You guys like to make statements with little to no foundation when it comes to numbers

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:08:51

And you misrepresent the truth about housing in Austin with your unverifiable hypotheticals.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 10:16:45

You have to include the down payment in the costs. That isn’t free money.

You also have to allow for a rise in HOA fees. As buildings age, things need replacement.

How much do parking spots go for? How much is it for a 2nd spot?

Don’t forget fees to record the deed, etc. And RE fees. On the purchase and the sale.

If you don’t plan to live there long-term, I’d rethink this. But if you do, go for it. I personally don’t look at saving a hundred bucks (or whatever) a month as a strong reason; there are other ways to save an amount like that which don’t involve HOAs, condo restrictions, maintenance, etc.

I note that you didn’t account anything for maintenance in your analysis.

Buy if you want, but if you lose your job next yr and the best job you’re offered is in San Fran or Boston or whatever… have fun with your condo that you bought to save some piddling amount of chump change (TM).

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 10:18:53

“$1770 a month!!!!

Less than $1900″

=============

RAL, I need you to weigh in. Is it OK for me to call this chump change?

( Also note - He didn’t factor in ANYTHING for maintenance/special assessments for condo-wide repairs, he hasn’t explained the parking situation, and I don’t think he’s factored in closing costs, so I doubt he’d save that much anyway, if he were capable of the full analysis)

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:37:37

By the way…. I just picked a 2nd OEM alternator for the DirtyMax. $90. Your Honda? $700.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 11:11:53

I don’t keep a car long enough for it to require alternator replacement.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-01-18 11:44:26

On the domestics is a $90 alternator reliable? Last domestic I had was a Mustang and the Autozone alternators for it were not reliable, but the OEM ones weren’t that expensive.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 11:46:58

Buy if you want, but if you lose your job next yr and the best job you’re offered is in San Fran or Boston or whatever… have fun with your condo that you bought to save some piddling amount of chump change (TM).

On the other hand, if Austin is really as jumping as he says it is, he should be able to find another job.

Unless, of course, things change.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 12:03:52

Carl…

They’re quite reliable, especially GM’s but like everything else, alternators get weak as they age. I bought another to add twin alternator set up on the DirtyMax. I just bought 2 new replacement batteries for it and notice the system voltage takes substantially longer to get up to operating range(which means weak alternator). As you been saying, proceed at your own risk with non-OEM parts. Some are ok but there is too much risk of getting stranded by screwing around with non-OEM alternators even though it’s a 15 minute job to replace it.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 12:09:42

“On the other hand, if Austin is really as jumping as he says it is, he should be able to find another job”

But would it be the *best* job?

Best meaning not only best salary, but best potential, best work environment, best benefits, best management, etc.

There are a lot of jobs. No one is saying he couldn’t get a job.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:49:37

Some are ok but there is too much risk of getting stranded by screwing around with non-OEM alternators even though it’s a 15 minute job to replace it.
I’ve been stranded when an OEM alternator failed. Felt no better than if I had been stranded with a non-OEM. You pay your money and makes your choice. If OEM costs 3X a non OEM, it might make sense to buy 2 of the cheaper ones & carry the extra with your spare tire. Changing a spare tire takes about 15 minutes too. Of course some vehicles take much longer to service.
My new Elantra came with no spare tire of any kind. It’s the newest fad to save weight and increase mileage. The day after I bought the Elantra I bought a full-size spare tire. Couple of weeks ago it was parked in my driveway & got a flat during a snow storm. 15 min changeout & I was on my way. I could have called Elantra’s road service for free but didn’t want to wait the 1-2 hours it would have taken.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 12:51:36

Also keep in mind, maybe he does get a job but it’s on the other side of Austin. Or on the outskirts. Or another area of Texas.

I don’t know that much about IT but it does seem like contracts and projects come and go. I would expect staffing and company needs to be routinely in flux.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 13:02:34

There are a lot of jobs. No one is saying he couldn’t get a job.

Well, since he seems to love Austin so much, I guess that’s the price he has to pay.

 
 
 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2013-01-18 08:49:05

LMAO!

No matter where Californians move, they soon destroy it.

Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:07:12

Ran into an older, aged hippie type couple yesterday who moved from San Fran to Tampa Bay. From one bay area to the other. I commented that it must be culture and weather shock for them. Their reply was that it was a very welcome move. Didn’t elaborate any further, actually quite standoffish.

Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 09:10:46

And they will soon turn Tampa Bay and Florida into the liberal democrat hell-hole they just left…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:27:38

To be fair, Tampa already kind of is a hell hole.

Keep in mind, there are also some very nice places in FL that are liberal and not hell holes. Not everything is partisan, Banana! Many of the nicest places to live are are quite liberal. If I had to guess, I’d say it was a majority.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 09:30:23

I know.

I kinda luv Camden, Newark, Stockton, Cleveland, Detroit, Philly, etc.

 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:33:48

Don’t forget Washington, DC and Chicago!

 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:42:51

And Baltimore!

 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:44:26

“To be fair, Tampa already kind of is a hell hole.”

Indeed it is. DON’T. MOVE. HERE.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:46:06

I kinda luv Camden, Newark, Stockton, Cleveland, Detroit, Philly, etc.

————

Ridiculous cherry picking.

Look at the most desirable places to live in the U.S. and tell me how many of them voted for Mittens?

As I’ve said many times, I’ve voted for more GOP than I have for Dems (although I favor independents). And Obama was the only Dem I voted for in ‘16.

Partisanship and voting don’t dictate whether an area is nice or not. It’s just interesting that most upscale areas voted for Obama.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:51:34

Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:42:51
And Baltimore!
————

And New York!

LOL, any city has terrible and great areas. Baltimore has awesome areas–Fells Point, Canton, Harbor East, Locust Point, Roland Park, Homeland, Roger’s Forge, Federal Hill… much nicer than 99.9% of flyover.

Of course cities are segregated. I wrote yesterday that my neighborhood is 95%+ white and asian. Lots of Johns Hopkins people. But if you go a mile, you’re in areas that are mostly ignored and less than 25% white.

If you have a good education and want a good job, B’more is a good place to be. Best hospital in the US, tons of gov jobs (your social security checks come from Bmore), etc. Now, if you want to retire and have low cost of living, obviously B’more isn’t anywhere near the top of the list.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-01-18 10:30:50
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-01-18 10:55:01

Take a look at a 2012 election map

-Douglas County Kansas was the only county in Kansas that Obama won in. Lawrence is where Kansas University is (aka Mission Hills/South Johnson County Community College).

What’s interesting is how many die hard Republicans work for the government in Topeka, screw up the rest of the state by under-funding everything, but live in high-tax Lawrence/Douglas County.

There was a reason why the first section of the Kansas Turnpike to be widened to six lanes is the 15 mile stretch between Topeka and Lawrence…….and strangely enough, it’s the cheapest (per mile) toll on the whole turnpike.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 11:28:12

Good call on the muder maps of DC and Baltimore. I think I’ve posted these before to point out that the homicides are clustered in very well known areas. A majority are between Lombard Street on the south and Pulaski Highway/Orleans Street on the North. The other groupings are very predictible as well. The average person living in, say, Harbor East or Little Italy has no idea where any of those places are, other than if they see them on the news. Those places might as well be in a different country.

I wish the map had timestamps… Vast majority of the killings are between 10pm and sunrise. I wonder why??

On my side of town, when you see murders south of Eastern Avenue (there are usually a few per yr), you’re talking about domestic/family disputes.

Allocation of police resources is very interesting. There are bike cops and cops who use segways in the nicer areas of town, to deter property crime and keep out undesirable elements. In other areas, police only show up in force to knock down doors and bust dealers. Perversely, it’s the latter activities that get federal money, even though they serve to continue the ridiculous “war on drugs” that keeps drug prices high and increases violence in the long run. Idiotic.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 11:37:04

I just checked the murder map for 2012…

There were zero (0) homicides with guns in southeast baltimore, south of Eastern Avenue in 2012. This is the 21224 ZIP code, which has the highest pop of any Maryland ZIP code.

There was one (1) total homicide in that area in 2012, which was in December and involved a mother stabbing her 2 yr old baby. Sickening, obviously. I believe it had something to do with child protective services going to remove the child from the woman’s custody but I forget the exact story.

Looking at homicide is interesting… the analysis should really be on who is killing, who is being killed, and why.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:51:52

Vast majority of the killings are between 10pm and sunrise.
I found that true from my readings. Only good thing that happens in that time frame is a baby being born.

 
Comment by jane
2013-01-18 21:02:23

Umm. I do the bulk of my school assignments within that window. At the risk of being obvious and boring, those are the traditional hours for writers and would-be scholars.

There’s something marvelously ascetic about toiling away through the hour of the wolf, imagining yourself in a garret and living on crumbs.

I don’t actually like it very much.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-01-18 21:45:42

There are a number of texts that stipulate those late hours are very productive for programmers as well… Has to do with a lack of distractions and a tired mind required to focus as opposed to a hyperactive mind that may switch focus and context easily during the day.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:12:58

Their reply was that it was a very welcome move.

Well, the cost of living must be lower. And if they sold a paid for house in San Fran, they have a ton of money leftover after buying a new place in Tampa.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:23:01

Older people can move because they don’t need jobs. It’s not like we’re going to start seeing educated workers flocking to Floriduh anytime soon.

The equity vulturing can be good, surely. Sell a million dollar crap shack in Silicon Valley, buy a palatial house in FL for a fraction of the price. The thing is, the cultural shock doesn’t sink in until later. My parents sold their primary Howard County MD house and moved to Jensen Beach, FL for most of the year. The house is really nice, but the area is really tacky/trashy. The area is very white and also pretty old. A mix of red necks and people in “God’s waiting room”. When they’re down there, they don’t get a lot of visits from any of us kids.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:54:03

The thing is, the cultural shock doesn’t sink in until later.

Yup, but if they have no pensions and just the equity in their Bay Area crap shack, they might have no other choice other than to grin and bear it.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:12:31

“Sell a million dollar crap shack in Silicon Valley”.

They won’t be able to because by the time they’re ready to sell, they’ll be so far underwater that they can’t.

Remember. SF Bay area has not corrected yet.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 10:29:37

“One day if I do go to heaven… I’ll look around and say, ‘It ain’t bad, but it ain’t San Francisco.’” Herb Caen.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:32:50

SF Bay area has not corrected yet
And it won’t as long as people are willing to ‘pay any price, bear any burden’ to live there.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 10:45:35

I’ve been following Bay Area RE pretty closely since about 2002.

Prices came down almost 30% in SF (in many, but not all, neighborhoods), which is not nearly as much as they went up during the bubble. The lowest point was in the Fall of 2011.

Now we are in another RE bubble here, and it’s anyone’s guess how this will end. This time around rents are rising insanely, which was not the case during the mania 2004-08.

Here the discussion is how the City is becoming “Manhattanized”, meaning everyone but the wealthy will be priced out. There seems to be more distress about the rising costs of rents and buying this time around than there was last time. In the last bubble there was mania and euphoria, nowadays more people are worrying about whether the city will lose its “soul” because of the high cost of living.

And yet, the young people keep moving here, in droves. It’s not for everyone, but here is something magnetic about SF.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:47:13

” something magnetic about SF.”

Shit attracts flies.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 11:13:15

Pimples,

You seem like one unhappy guy. Too much online glooming and dooming? Get outside and enjoy life a little. Find a hobby, spend a little money on something frivolous, get laid, whatever…
…but sheesh, quit spreading your misery around.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 11:36:28

Still pretending to ignore me while hanging on my every post.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 11:58:49

They won’t be able to because by the time they’re ready to sell, they’ll be so far underwater that they can’t.

I’d assume that some (definitely not all) Bay Area seniors have paid for houses that right now could fetch 1 million or more. And even if the prices drop, if they are paid for, they can sell them at the market price and move somewhere cheaper.

But some people won’t move, no matter what.

We have some friends in San Marcos, CA. They bought their shack for 80K back in the early 80’s. They have lucky ducky jobs. During the bubble they had realtors cold call on them, telling them that they could get them 500K for their decrepit (and I mean DECREPIT) house.

I advised them to take the money and run. At the time they could have bought a brand new house in our little burg for 150K. Since they had lucky ducky jobs they would be easy to replace.

So by dumping the dump:
1) They could have had a paid for, brand new house.
2) Had at least 300K leftover, in the bank
3) Could have found work locally. Nothing great, but no worse than what they left behind.

But they chose to stay put, since San Marcos was their “home”

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 12:15:25

“The liberal hellhole that is San Francisco”. Thanks, nannerz, I’m gonna enshrine that one.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:14:21

Come to think of it, I actually ran into two Cali to Fla transplant baby boomer couples yesterday, one from NoCal, the other from SoCal. Interesting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:15:06

People who move for cheaper housing are often (not always, obviously!) the “less desirable” elements of a certain region.

It’s simply a form of adverse selection.

Manhattan/DC/Silicon Valley are sort of the opposite. People moving to an area to take advantage of it network effects.

Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:29:49

“People who move for cheaper housing are often (not always, obviously!) the “less desirable” elements of a certain region.”

The No-Cal-ers didn’t say why they had moved. Like I said, very tight lipped and standoffish. The So-Cal-ers were delightful folks who have retired and moved here to be closer to their family members on the East Coast. They plan on spending summers in the Mid-Atlantic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:38:49

“They plan on spending summers in the Mid-Atlantic.”

So in other words, they’re not moving to FL for jobs, they’re moving to snowbird and tax haven. Not really a great long term trend for FL housing prices. These people will be fine, after all they sold in CA to move there. However, with long term demographics being what they are, this will not end well for FL/FL homedebtors.

 
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:41:41

Very few people move to Florida for jobs, lol.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-01-18 13:00:44

You call those Northern Californians standoffish. It could be that they came from some colder part of the country before moving to California. People from the great frozen north are less likely to spill their life stories to total strangers that they meet walking down the street.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 13:52:18

They won’t stay in Florida for long. Mid-Atlantic winters are not bad enough to escape from. On the ~20 bad days, a retiree can stay inside. And the winter doesn’t drag on two months too long like it does up north.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-01-18 13:06:43

‘the “less desirable” elements of a certain region…It’s simply a form of adverse selection’

So on top of being obsessed with how much people earn (so you can look down on them), you’re a candidate for Grand Wizard too!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 13:55:05

I like the way that on poster on HBB tells me to “chase cheaper rent” while another poster on HBB tells me that I am a “less desireable element of a certain region” for chasing cheaper rent.

 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 09:03:51

Isn’t great that obama re-inflated the housing bubble with $6 Trillion of deficit spending?

Enjoy the benefits of “hope and change”

I know I will…

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-01-18 10:22:57

He not only reinflated the housing market he reinflated the stock market which was much more important to the truly rich. The creation of paper money put trillions back into their net worth. The stock market recovered, the job market has not.
The tax increase on the rich will take back around 42 billion per year, do the math and see how long it takes to get back even one trillion. Meanwhile the paper money caused inflation raising gas prices from around 1.70 a gallon to over $3 and raising food prices throughout the world hitting the middle class. How, I use to get attacked on this board for saying that Obama’s policies benefit the rich over the working class. Now, while some try to isolate him from the Fed policies, it is orthodoxy that the easy money has favored the rich and punished the working class.

About half the people have figured it out: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-begins-second-term-51-percent-approval-poll-131220929–election.html

 
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:35:53

So, big layoffs at your company just yesterday and today you’re thinking of buying?

Interesting.

Comment by Brett
2013-01-18 10:06:03

My rents have increases in the same area from $1300 to now $1900 since 2009 when I moved downtown.
What am I looking for?
Freaking stable housing costs… I hate these increments every year

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:14:54

Brett…. you’re one of my favorite real estate professionals…… you really are.

Anyways…. rental rates have fallen nearly 9% in Austin, TX…. and still falling.

http://www.zillow.com/local-info/TX-Austin-home-value/r_10221/#metric=mt%3D46%26dt%3D1%26tp%3D5%26rt%3D8%26r%3D10221%252C274685%252C271391%252C271635%26el%3D0

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 10:22:12

What will happen when you need to repair your place? (replace an appliance, for example)? Or when you need to move for work? Selling is not as simple as breaking a lease and paying a fee.

Do you also realize that property taxes and property insurance increase over time?

Why are some forms of inefficiency more preferable to you than others? Is it because they’re more obvious because Americans have been trained to think a certain way?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:26:56

Freaking stable housing costs… I hate these increments every year
Then I wish you good luck. You will need it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 10:31:01

Yep.

AC unit spent? Cha-ching
New roof? Cha-ching
Property tax levy? Cha-ching

Stick with the stable, predictable and more affordable rents while housing prices continue to fall.

 
 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 10:35:54

Brett, I hear ya. There are certain places where renting is crazy expensive, despite what some folks here say.

But anything with an HOA is not stable, price-wise.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by localandlord
2013-01-18 11:25:27

Brett, don’t do it. Especially withof the job situation.

I’m mapping out a 2 week vacation for you to take this summer. Don’t book rooms in advance - some cities you will want to breeze through - some you will stay a couple of days.

Start in Nashville, then Chattanooga, Atlanta, Greenville, Charlotte, Raliegh, Greensboro, Knoxville, Lexington, Louisville, St Louis, Kansas City, then home.

You will discover affordable cities that have some form of hip night life and a decent economy. See if any feel like home and start researching job options. It may be time to vote with your feet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 09:39:33

Brett, I’m sorry, but I don’t think you can buy, with the unstable job situation. Do you think you’ll have a job for the next 5-6 years? If you lose your job and have to sell and move, that’s how long it would take you to break even, at least.

Unfortunately, you may have to leave downtown. Not that you have to chase cheaper rent and live among the Section 8s (I as I have), but that hip lifestyle comes with a price.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 09:41:29

$1899 where do the poor people live? geez i have a view of the new WTC and pay a whole lot less..

Comment by sfhomowner
2013-01-18 10:47:38

$1899 in Manhattan? Rent control?

Comment by polly
2013-01-18 11:03:55

He lives in Queens.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 11:31:30

A basement in Queens, I believe.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 12:16:35

With cats. :-)

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-01-18 13:18:03

nope 2 family house great landlord and a view of Manhattan in winter when the leaves fall off the front trees….sun in the back bedroom in the morning sun in the front right now….but

the Bad part its gets freakin hot in the summer without at least 1 ac running 24/7 ….old house brick, plaster walls and a flat roof….

 
 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-01-18 11:26:05

After the lay offs, I got worse than expected rent news.

Maybe they knew you were one of the lucky ones who. They’ve gotta milk money out of those who actually still have it.

 
Comment by Inflation vs. Deflation
2013-01-18 11:40:14

How can you get a mortgage with no job? Or is it cash?

Move east of I-35 or south of Town Lake… to get something cheaper… unless you need to walk to the 6th St “action” and more importantly back home :-) .

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-01-18 15:29:35

Which part of “condos are always a bad idea” is not getting through to people?!

And Brett. 2-3 miles is “just down a couple of blocks”, in Texas.

Be smart. GTF out of downtown Austin. I’ve been there. It ain’t “all that”.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:24:00

Austin? Really? WTF? Awful heat and humidity in the warm months, makes Phoenix look good. Must be a lot of good paying jobs in Austin.

 
 
Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 08:19:51

An odd new ad from Century 21.

By Seth Stevenson|Posted Monday, April 10, 2006, at 12:14 PM ET

The Spot:A title card reads “The Debate.” We fade in on a couple standing in their kitchen, arguing about whether to buy a new house. The wife is the aggressor; the husband has his doubts. “Suzanne researched this,” says the wife in exasperation. As we’re wondering who Suzanne is, the ad cuts to an image of the couple’s kitchen telephone. “This listing is special, John,” says the voice of their real estate agent over the speakerphone. “You guys can do this.” The husband caves. “This is awesome,” says the wife. We see a picture of the agent’s Century 21 business card.

(Click here to see the ad.)

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/ad_report_card/2006/04/the_nastiest_wife_on_television.html - 101k -

Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 14:05:45

Jeffy did you catch this little gem in the article?

It’s not just that the housing market seems poised for a dip,

April 2006! Good for Slate. :cool:

Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 14:25:04

I`m just trying to figure out why I am not mad about being called “Jeffy”.

Comment by oxide
2013-01-18 18:08:59

Feminine mystique?? :razz:

There, now you can get mad at that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 18:33:48

Nah I`m good, but thanks for trying.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 08:57:48

Bursting the University Bubble
Townhall.com | January 18, 2013 | Suzanne Fields

“Bubbles form when too many people expect values to go up forever,” Reynolds says. “Bubbles burst when there are no longer enough excessively optimistic and ignorant folks to fuel them. And there are signs that this is beginning to happen already where education is concerned.” With so much fat in the system the knowledge protein may not be enough to produce the intellectual muscle needed for a prosperous life in the 21st century. Like fast food and high-energy drinks, empty calories offer only temporary highs.

“The college presidents with their $1 million-plus salaries and bloated administrative staffs, the whole system of tenure has turned out to be as much a recipe for intellectual conformity as it is a fiscal nightmare,” observes the New Criterion, a magazine that closely follows the politicization of the university.

In the decade after 2001, the number of administrators grew 50 times faster than the number of instructors, according to the U.S. Department of Education. A decline in the hours spent in teaching by tenured professors coincides with sharply increasing tuition fees to pay for luxury dorms, dining halls and gyms that have little to do with actual learning but everything to do with bulking up the academic bureaucracy.

Moody’s Investors Service, the credit rating firm, finds that students are “increasingly attending more affordable community colleges, studying part time or electing to enter the workforce without the benefit of a college education.” Total student debt now approaches a trillion dollars.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that new technology offers less expensive access to information, providing quality goods at lower cost.

There are obstacles aplenty to improving higher education for less money, but the trends inspire optimism. One professor of computer science at Stanford discovered he could reach as many online students in one year as it would take 250 years in a college classroom. Harvard and MIT now offer a credentialed certificate for students who complete their online courses and can show a mastery of the material.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:10:41

It’s going to be interesting to see how this turns out, as even low paying, menial jobs like “assistant manager” in retail often require a bachelor’s degree these days.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-01-18 09:41:21

“Bubbles burst when there are no longer enough excessively optimistic and ignorant folks to fuel them. And there are signs that this is beginning to happen already where education is concerned.”

How much longer will it take for the U.S. housing bubble to burst? Because for the time being, it doesn’t appear we have run out of buyers with buckets of money and boxes of stupid.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 09:00:00

Hope and change boyz…

Forward to a new America.

———————

AP sources: New nonprofit to promote Obama agenda
Associated Press | Jan 18, 2013 3:57 AM EST | Ken Thomas

In an unprecedented move, President Barack Obama’s vaunted political organization is being turned into a nonprofit group—funded in part by corporate money—to mobilize support behind the president’s second-term agenda.

Democratic officials familiar with the plan said Thursday the tax-exempt organization will be called Organizing for Action and seek to harness the energy of the president’s re-election campaign for future legislative fights. Officials said the group will be separate from the Democratic National Committee and advocate on key policy issues such as gun control and immigration, train future leaders and devote attention to local issues around the nation. …

Coming just days before Obama’s second inauguration, the move represents the first time a sitting president has ever transformed his presidential campaign operation into an outside group with the express purpose of promoting his agenda.

Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 10:24:05

Hope and Change or Gloom and Doom?
Friday, January 18, 2013
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 54% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat approve of President Obama’s job performance.

CNN/Time/ORC 55% 1/14-15/13
NBC/Wall St. Journal 52% 1/12-15/13
AP-GfK * 54% 1/10-14/13
ABC/Washington Post 55% 1/10-13/13

Comment by Albuquerquedan
Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 11:46:01

Yes the new American terrorist movement is getting stronger and now even our own military is noticing.

A new study from a think tank connected to the West Point Military Academy highlights the threat of violent far-right movements in the United States, leading to the conclusion that, while diverse in in their causes, they are similar in their use of violence to achieve their aims.

http://www.ctc.usma.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ChallengersFromtheSidelines.pdf

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 12:56:22

threat of violent far-right movements in the United States
What type of movement would you say the Fast & Furious guys belonged to, the ones who were responsible for sending dozens of assault weapons into Mexico & with the inevitable drifting back in the USA? The weapons that have so far killed several hundred innocents.

 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-01-18 13:30:30

The ATF is a toothless bureaucracy that has the same number of agents (2500) they did back in 1972. The gun running idea was recycled from a old CIA scheme. I can’t think of one good thing to say about the ATF.

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:28:25

Frightened Bluestar? Maybe even paranoid?

 
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 12:00:30

You know what they ususally do with it?

Give it to the campaigns of other politicians in their party or to the party campaign committee itself which then spends it on campaigns for other party members.

This is a significant step up from the uses that the money is generally put to. There are significant restrictions on non-profit organizations.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 09:04:36

Bubble aftermath keeps getting crazier:
Akron homeowner who threatened to kill anyone who attempted to demolish house taken into custody

An Army veteran and retiree who threatened to kill anyone who attempted to demolish his condemned Akron house was taken into custody Wednesday night after he drove away from the property.
Lawrence “Larry” L. Modic, 57, of Lakewood, was picked up by Akron police after a traffic stop. He was taken to the Portage Path Psychiatric Emergency Services facility in Akron, where he remained under evaluation Thursday, police Lt. Rick Edwards said.
Upon entry into the home at 1480 Manchester Road, police on Wednesday found four rifles and a handgun, all loaded, along with two boxes of ammunition, as well as military-style Meals Ready to Eat (MREs) and a flak jacket, Edwards said.
“Yes, I am willing to take someone’s life” to “protect what’s mine,” Modic wrote in a December email to state Rep. Vernon Sykes, D-Akron, one of many similar threats.
Last week, Modic received a letter from the city telling him the property would be boarded up on or after Jan. 16 and that demolition would follow. The letter also said Modic no longer would be allowed inside the house without city permission.

“Over my dead body,” Modic told a reporter was his reaction to the letter.

On Monday, Modic emailed the city official who wrote that letter. “You will learn that this mistake you made will be costly!” he replied. “I promise you that if this continues.”

The home was boarded up Thursday, and the electricity was cut off, city officials said.

Edwards said Modic was picked up because he was considered a threat to himself or others in the community because of the threats he has made. He had no weapons in his car and did not resist being taken into custody.

A retired Army sergeant, Modic bought the home on a short sale May 30 for $10,000. He said he had no idea the city’s Housing Appeals Board had numerous issues with it and was considering it for demolition.

The real estate agent who handled the sale also said he was not aware there were orders on the house.

The city provided the Beacon Journal with a number of letters it sent to the previous owner, from 2003 through 2011, listing numerous issues it had with the home and said it was the seller’s responsibility to inform the buyer.

Left out of the article were the Housing Appeals Board ‘issues’ and just how it might be possible for a potential buyer to learn about them prior to a sale with or without help of a realtor. The city has nothing to do with housing sales, that all happens at the county level. Comments to this item are interesting.

Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 09:22:33

The guy got screwed over by a government selling an asset without disclosing it was going to demolish the place?

So the guy goes nuts and buys a box of MREs :-)

Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 10:14:15

guy got screwed over by a government selling an asset
Article did not say that the local government had anything to do with this sale, it seems to have been made from a private party. See summary of his house from county records here.
The county has assessed this home as 200% of its most recent selling value, quite an over-assessment for this county! It says its “condition” is 88%. My own house’s condition is 93% from the same source and it is not condemned for demolition (at least as far as I know at the moment). My assessed total is from 30-50% of what I might be able to sell it for.
The Akron city government apparently has some authority over housing demolition but zero responsibility for notifying anyone about it. Nice job if you can get it.
The guy is getting screwed over AFTER buying an asset. But this is not worth killing anyone over.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-01-18 15:35:12

“…said it was the seller’s responsibility to inform the buyer.”

Exactly. Now find them and take everything they own.

 
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:05:58

As I mentioned the other day, it looks like the legal action against Lance Armstrong by USPS relies on the False Claims Act.

And they have a very strong case.

http://www.law360.com/governmentcontracts/articles/408457?nl_pk=9d07ff26-0986-46de-917f-4b7f3ce1f9dc&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=governmentcontracts

——————————————–
Law360, New York (January 17, 2013, 9:14 PM ET) — A former teammate of Lance Armstrong detailed rampant doping by the U.S. Postal Service cycling team in a False Claims Act suit leaked to the media Thursday as the U.S. Department of Justice faced a deadline to decide whether to join the suit.

In the complaint, published Thursday on the New York Daily News’ website, former Armstrong teammate Floyd Landis claims the team practiced blood doping, used steroids and injected human growth hormone, which the Postal Service claims violated the “morals clause” of their contract.

The DOJ declined to comment when asked whether it had intervened in a False Claims Act suit against Armstrong, but a source familiar with the case said a filing had been made before Thursday’s deadline, although it remained under seal.”

Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 09:31:40

Lol, look for Armstrong to renounce his US citizenship and move elsewhere.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-01-18 09:45:15

Perhaps Belize?

News
McAfee’s Escape From Belize Turns Movie
Tale of eccentric antivirus founder John McAfee’s escape to Guatemala and Miami set to be adapted by the team behind Crazy, Stupid, Love.
Mathew J. Schwartz | January 16, 2013 01:17 PM

The story of eccentric 67-year-old antivirus firm founder John McAfee’s escape from Belize, to Guatemala, to Miami, is set to hit the big screen.

Warner Bros. has optioned the rights to “John McAfee’s Last Stand,” a Wired story written by contributor Joshua Davis, reported Hollywood Reporter.

John Requa and Glenn Ficarr will reportedly adapt the story, as well as direct and produce the film. The pair previously directed the 2011 Warner Bros. comedy Crazy, Stupid, Love, which earned $143 million worldwide. Both Wired publisher Conde Nast Entertainment and Davis will serve as movie co-producers.

Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 12:19:00

Good for Josh! What a fun shoot THAT could be. Bill Murray?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 09:52:50

Lol, look for Armstrong to renounce his US citizenship and move elsewhere.
————

Wouldn’t matter under FCA, he and his assets would still be fair game. As they should be.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 09:56:32

What if they’re hidden offshore?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2013-01-18 10:22:59

I’m sure he’s already planned for any and all contingencies. He may be a doper, but he’s no dope.

Besides, it’s a lot more fun to hound some tatooed Polynesian football player over a little bit of romantic drama.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 10:29:01

I can’t answer all the what-ifs. The fed gov has incredible resources and leverage, the real question is whether it makes sense to take this thing to trial (resource allocation, publicity, prosecutorial discretion) vs getting a reasonable settlement. IIRC, Lance owns a handful of properties around the country. He also had 2 very public divorces, pays child support, etc. The sources of his money are also incredibly easy to identify; Nike et al were not paying him “under the table”. It certainly does not appear that he was arranging his life to make his assets hard to identify. I’d be shocked if he was aggressively preparing to be disgraced and taken to court.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 10:59:02

Besides, it’s a lot more fun to hound some tatooed Polynesian football player over a little bit of romantic drama.

I just don’t understand the uproar over this.

 
Comment by In Purgatory
2013-01-18 12:18:24

Phone leaders, phony economy and we wonder why our athletes suck a$$.

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Purgatory
2013-01-18 09:54:07

I didn’t see this in discussion yesterday so I am going to ask it…

Why in the hell USPS has to sponsor and spend money in advertisements to begin with? Blowing money left and right and they wonder how they are in a hole.

Comment by 2banana
2013-01-18 10:54:06

Are you questioning government accounting practices?

How very unpatriotic…

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 11:02:53

Why does anyone use professional athletes as endorsers? Most of them are sleazebags.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-01-18 11:03:03

They are in direct competition with UPS and Fedex…..maybe not in letters, but in (more profitable) packages.

 
Comment by joesmith
2013-01-18 11:29:59

The USPS would make money except for the fact it is required to double-fund its pensions. The USPS is treated differently than other government agencies in this regard. The intent is/was to disadvantage the USPS (which is not allowed to make political contributions) compred to UPS, FedEx, DHL (which contribute lavishly to politicians).

Comment by ahansen
2013-01-18 12:33:34

Yep. It’s run as a corporation, but has to get Congressional approval for any changes to update its business model. (From 1974!)

They had $55 BILLION in excess pension funding that Congress just couldn’t wait to get its grubby hands on a few years ago.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2013-01-18 11:05:58

And there is the Postal Service saying he violated the moral clause in the contract.

What was I saying just the other day?

 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-01-18 11:41:02

As a former employee of a smaller, Hedgie “managed” company, whose demise didn’t make the front page, this story is too familiar

http:/tinyurl.com/a2zbexy

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-01-18 11:53:50

In our case, it wasn’t pension contributions. It was EVERY payroll deduction for a 3-6 month period…….tax withholding, 401K contributions, health/life dental insurance premiums…..

On top of that, they were billing clients for parts and services, but stiffing the actual providers.

They basically pocketed all this money, then declared bankruptcy a few days before the quarterly tax check had to be mailed to the IRS. All of us working stiffs suddenly became “unsecured creditors”.

(Yeah, tell that to the IRS, when you have to essentially pay the same tax bill twice).

As near as I can calculate, about 3/4 of a billion dollars disappeared into the pockets of about 10-12 people. Nobody in the law enforcement establishment seems interested in finding out.

IOW, it’s all perfectly legal.

I’ve taken the position that most suit trash = pond scum, until proven otherwise. About 99% of the time, it doesn’t take long to confirm my evaluation.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 12:04:05

As near as I can calculate, about 3/4 of a billion dollars disappeared into the pockets of about 10-12 people. Nobody in the law enforcement establishment seems interested in finding out.

I’m sure the huge paychecks and bonuses they received were perfectly legal and untouchable in BK court.

Comment by tresho
2013-01-18 13:01:42

Legal or not, it was fraud. I’m sure similar misfortune has happened to many.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-01-18 13:05:25

Oh, I’m sure it was intentionally fraudulent. Just saying they planned their scam very well. I’m sure they consulted the finest attorneys to set it up just right.

 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-01-18 16:59:37

“Nobody in the law enforcement establishment seems interested in finding out.”

Most law enforcement agencies are underfunded. On purpose. This of course means they are understaffed.

To add insult to injury is the regular propaganda campaign that they are overpaid.

The corruption in this country is second to none.

 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 15:59:57

“Inventories have plunged”

“Another reason prices have recovered so nicely is that inventories have fallen to record low levels, particularly relative to the working-age population, as you can see below.”

“Rock-Bottom Inventories”

Since I know this is based on a massive cover-up I have to assume the rest of the charts are too.

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-01-18 16:11:53

The inventory issue differs by state…in some cases (ahem, Florida), low inventories would be much higher if there wasn’t so much distressed housing clogging the courts, in other cases, it is less clear that there is a significant supply in the shadows.

In any event, she provides references for each chart, so at least the results should be replicable (if you believe there is a kernal of truth to the source data).

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-01-18 23:38:33

Rental Pimp still pimping the REIC lies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by moral hazard
2013-01-18 15:50:39

Florida homeowners, and homebuyers, get $60 million boost

By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 4:34 p.m. Friday, Jan. 18, 2013

State lawmakers this week divvied up how $60 million of Florida’s mortgage settlement money will be used to aid struggling homeowners, with more than half flowing to first-time homebuyers for down payment assistance and millions directed at borrowers through legal aid and housing counseling.

Also, Florida’s circuit courts will get $5 million for additional employees to handle foreclosures and to provide “technology solutions” to speed cases through the system.

The money is part of $334 million the state received in the March settlement between attorneys general and the nation’s five largest banks to atone for foreclosure-related abuses. State coffers got $74 million of the payment, which included a 10 percent civil penalty allowed for in the settlement and another $40 million civil penalty added through an agreement between lawmakers and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

How Florida will spend $60 million from its share of the national mortgage settlement

• $5 million to legal aid groups

• $35 million to a first-time homebuyer down payment assistance program

• $10 million to HUD-approved housing and credit counseling groups

• $5 million to state courts to pay for additional employees and develop a technological solution to speed foreclosure cases

• $5 million to reimburse the Florida attorney general’s office for legal fees

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-01-19 00:31:19

“We need more government to pay for all of the additional government.”

- Anonymous Progressive

“Is there any activity, food, service, habit or thought that the progressives will not attack and try to eliminate?”

- Concerned citizen of the world

“Chaos - When you absolutely positively have to fundamentally change a perfectly good country in just under two terms.”

- Nickpapageorgio

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post