February 25, 2013

Bits Bucket for February 25, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

234 Comments »

Comment by michael
2013-02-25 06:32:38

Just heard that DC metro home prices are up 11% YOY…guess I’ve been priced out forever.

Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 06:38:35

patience, grasshopper. The sequester is right around the corner!

Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 06:53:07

And don’t forget, Rome fell and so can Washington. When it does, you’ll be glad you were “priced out”!

Comment by eight pieces of chicken
2013-02-25 08:25:58

Who are the barbarians today?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe smith
2013-02-25 08:38:07

teabillies

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-02-25 09:18:09

Cultural relativist bedwetter libtards.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 10:29:59

Flat earthers.

Just smart enough to be dangerous to themselves and others.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 10:36:43

Who are the barbarians today?

The 47%… when their .gov handouts, benefits, and largess are cut, they’ll be rioting and looting and generally barbaric behavior. Got firearms?

Oh, wait, firearms are below the ruling class. They show a distinct lack of “control”, as I recall someone posting recently. And they’re associated with “Teabillies”, so they must be bad. We’ll see how that mindset works out… probably about as well as it’s working out for Assad in Syria. I hear he has lots of “control”.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 12:42:17

Did I just hear a dog whistle?

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-02-25 14:45:36

Justice For Trayvon™ will be achieved by looting Foot Locker.

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2013-02-25 17:08:14

“Who are the barbarians today?”

I see 2 groups of people.

The first own guns and think the government is out to get them.

The second own guns and are involved in the drug trade or some other illegal activity and belong to a gang.

Disclaimer: These two sets do not include all gun owners.

Open question: Are there any barbarians that are not gun owners? Banksters don’t qualify, because they buy the government. They have a vested interest in seeing the current state of affairs continue.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 17:12:56

If they work for the government do they count as barbarians? Or does that eliminate them by definition no matter how barbaric they may be?

 
Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 17:27:05

Who are the barbarians today?

The 47%… when their .gov handouts, benefits, and largess are cut,

No, the barbarians are Jack Welch, Carly Fiorina, and their greedy brethren who outsourced and insourced jobs. You know, the jobs that the 47% used to have.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-02-25 19:42:05

‘Who are the barbarians today?’

This is easy. Historically, if a power wanted to invade some place, a place where they could enslave or generally oppress the people, take their land and resources, they were called barbarians. The barbarians of the day are in Iran, Syria and Africa.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-02-26 01:17:31

Open question: Are there any barbarians that are not gun owners?

(raises hand tentatively)

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 08:39:06

Rome was founded around 750 bc and didn’t begin to fall until around 200 ad.

Are you willing to wait 950 years to get into your dream home?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 08:47:04

Apparently the US is speeding up the cycle of civilization rot.

 
Comment by Urbanachiever
2013-02-25 08:49:30

Information Age. Once it starts crumbling, collapse will be swift.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 10:28:27

Information, atomic, jet, space age.

It deosn’t get any faster than that.

Yes, everything social and technical happens at an accelerated rate these days. It makes the rat race look like a stroll in the park.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 11:37:25

My dream doesn’t include slaving for 30 years under the burden of debt. It is so unnecessary to join the herd of sheep.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-02-25 12:07:21

ohhh Blue…..

I wanna house, just like the house, that married dear ole dad.

 
Comment by mathguy
2013-02-25 12:11:09

You forget that you will always need a roof over your head and will need to work to pay for that your entire life. Even if you buy your house outright, the gov’t still charges a lower “rent” in the form of property tax that you still need to pay. Life has it’s burdens..

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 12:31:53

too funny dj!

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 12:48:51

mathguy, I’ve never heard property taxes as an argument for the debt hampster lifestyle before! The “you’ve got to live somewhere” one is pretty familiar though.

 
Comment by rms
2013-02-25 13:37:24

“Comment by Urbanachiever”

Welcome aboard!

 
Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 14:16:41

Agree. I took Latin in high school, and the teacher didn’t say anything about sandal-shiners in the Roman army hooking up the Centurians with e*trade.

 
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-02-25 11:22:06

Hi palmetto,
Where have you been lately?

Everyone-
Wired Magazine (last yr) had an article about the Utah NSA data center to be ready in Sept 2013. Scary future awaits us.
(ixquick or startpage it-no search saving database)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by inchbyinch
 
Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 11:28:06

Greetings, inch. Given the state of our gobmin, the NSA data center doesn’t scare me. Our fine blogger Ben gave me (and others here on the board) a good dose of reality on that.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-02-25 11:49:41

Don’t leave me in the dark. What was the take away on Ben’s and other brainiacs opinions?

 
Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 14:50:50

Generally speaking, incompetence on the idiocracy level.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-02-26 00:35:03

Thanks for the link, inch. For the anti-totalitarians among us this development is sobering indeed. Already thinking of alternate scenarios…. ;-)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 07:23:15

You can get this cherry picked statistic once a year if you are patient. DC home prices have been trading in a narrow range for four years, since their rapid decline was suddenly stopped at 25% off peak. The sucker’s rally is a non-event, it’s more of a sucker’s zombification.

Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 13:40:29

trading in a narrow range for four years, since their rapid decline was suddenly stopped at 25% off peak.

This sounds suspiciously like “bouncing along the bottom.”

And if it’s not a bottom, then why are the bottom feeders like Blackstone, cash buyers, and other entities buying the inventory to rent or flip or sell securities for? Like HBB likes to say, a house is worth what someone will pay for it. And if a bottom feeder pays a dollar figure for a house, then isn’t that the bottom worth of the house, instead of some historical mean from 40 years ago?

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 15:18:58

Sure it could be bouncing along a bottom, albiet a quite lofty one compared to anything before 2004. That’s not exactly 40 years ago, but we will see.

To call bouncing along sideways a sharp upturn every oscillation is either an intentional lie or a vision problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sean
2013-02-25 07:36:53

You and me both. After our trip to the playground with the kids we stumbled on an open house. Went in and saw a nice colonial 3 bedroom house for 574K. I asked how stuck they were on the price and the Realtor said “Pretty stuck, I mean they aren’t gonna GIVE it away!”

I love the way they make you sound like a freeloader. Nice house, but no where NEAR the money they are asking

Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:22:09

Just wait until you have to write a letter saying you will take care of the squirrels and fairies…

Comment by localandlord
2013-02-25 19:12:06

I’ve been worried about sfho’s fairies. Sounds like swarming termites to me. Maybe she should read over her teimite letter, maybe get the outbuildings checked.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:06:46

Prices will continue to go up in DC until the $1 Trillion/year obama deficits stop.

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 09:27:38

Perhaps that would be so, if they really were going up.

Case Shiller data says no.

Comment by Bill
2013-02-25 11:11:23

CaseShiller latest data. Washington 4.4% increase YOY.http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/sp-case-shiller-home-price-indices/en/us/?indexId=spusa-cashpidff–p-us—-

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 11:26:36

Does the concept of prices going up and down within a narrow range, without breaking out of that range, for a period of four years resonate at all with you? Have you actually looked at the Case Shiller graph or just parroting an NAR headline?

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-02-25 16:53:52

Blue,

The liars are hard at work with their BS here and everywhere.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Avocado
2013-02-25 16:10:47

maybe you will make more money someday….???

it is crazy, competitive out there these days… everyone’s margins are cutting back. Less dollars to fight for.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 18:46:36

Did you happen to smear any lamb’s blood near the door of your rental?

I’m beginning to suspect the Fed is employing a “passover” strategy, whereby Americans who don’t own homes will see their rents inflated sky high, while those who followed guidance from on high to join the Ownership Society will find that housing price inflation “passes them over,” as their monthly payments are locked in. Even if they cannot make their payments, myriad foreclosure protections are in place to keep them comfortably and affordably housed, while renters are merely hosed.

Does that sound about right?

 
 
Comment by hazard
2013-02-25 06:52:05

Posted this yesterday, this reply made me laugh.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-24 16:13:38

“American homeowners with a mortgage were collectively underwater by more than $1 trillion at the end of 2012.”

“That’s a lot of underwaterness!”

More than 70,000 South Floridians regained equity in their homes last year

by Kim Miller

“But negative equity is still very high, and millions of homeowners have a very long way to go to get back above water,” Humphries said. “As a result, negative equity will remain a major factor in the market for the foreseeable future.”

Nationally, 13.8 million homeowners with a mortgage were in negative equity at the end of last year, down from 15.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. American homeowners with a mortgage were collectively underwater by more than $1 trillion at the end of 2012.

Areas with the highest negative equity nationwide include, Atlanta (49.5 percent), Orlando (45.3 percent), Riverside, Calif. (43.8 percent), Detroit (43.4 percent), Sacramento (41.7 percent) and Tampa (41.5 percent).

http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/realtime/2013/02/21/more-than-70000-south-floridians-regained-equity-in-their-homes-last-year/ - 85k -

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 10:32:36

Source: Zillow

Yeah, that’s a credible source, alright. :lol:

Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 11:24:33

If you don’t have a sale price, the Zestimate (and similar estimates) is the only house-by-house calcuation of what a house would be “worth.” The only concrete credible source, I suppose, is neighborhood comps. That may work in cookie-cutter neighborhoods, but not in mish-mash neighborhoods like mine. Houses started off as cookie cutter 3/1 ~900 sq ft, but over the years they all spouted unique additions and features and landscaping and decks and porches etc. They are now anywhere from 900 - 1600 sq ft and from 3/1 to 5/3 (not always legal). How do you price that? And how do you price in foreclosures and short sales? Just because the house next door sold for $50K less in a short sale doesn’t mean yours non-FB house would sell for $50K less, because no bank would take a $50K hit for a non-FB. Zestimates may be just as good as comps.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 12:45:39

Estimates based on small numbers are worthless at much larger numbers…. without fancy math.

And Zillow estimates aren’t that great to begin with as have been proven here many times.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 12:55:35

‘If you don’t have a sale price, the Zestimate (and similar estimates) is the only house-by-house calcuation of what a house would be “worth.”’

Their ranges are so wide you can drive a truck through them. So what you are suggesting is that there is no reliable information whatever on what a home should reasonably sell for?

“The only concrete credible source, I suppose, is neighborhood comps. That may work in cookie-cutter neighborhoods, but not in mish-mash neighborhoods like mine.”

That’s why Zvi Griliches invented the theory of hedonic prices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 14:13:33

I’m not suggesting that there is NO reliable information. I’m suggesting that the ranges are so wide that you may as well use Zillow. Due to the different states of repair and add-ons, houses in my nabe have sold for mean +/-10%, i.e. a 20% range. And that range is due only to the house. The lot size, schools, and commute are very similar. You may as well use Zillow as well as comps. In fact you may as well throw darts.

But that’s for my mish-mash older burb where houses are wildly different from each other. For cookie-cutter zero lot-lines or for condos, the comps range of course is much narrower… as is the Zestimate.

 
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 15:30:30

Even in a condo building, there can be some range depending on the direction of the windows (how much light you get in the winter, views, noise), how high up you are, when the kitchen was last redone, etc. At my parents’ retirement place, there was a special assessment to do something to fix a construction defect in all the roofs. The development got financing for everyone who wanted to take it which was most of them. My parents got a better deal from their home equity loan, so they did it that way. During the time the financing is outstanding, a lot of the places have extra monthly carrying costs that attach to the unit. My parents’ unit doesn’t. Right there you have a variation in what the value should be. Does it make much difference over all since my parents would have to pay of the HELOC if they sold? No, of course not. But it would does make apparently identical units not as comparable as you would think.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 15:58:14

“Due to the different states of repair and add-ons, houses in my nabe have sold for mean +/-10%, i.e. a 20% range.”

Maybe Zillow is more accurate for DC area housing than for San Diego. I’ve seen +/- 50% for homes priced north of $1m.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by you're my boy, blue
2013-02-25 07:01:23

Is Se-Questa the new rapper from east coast?

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 07:40:55

Number one in the DC hood given a shout out to the PTBoyz!

Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 07:57:48

Yo, yo, yo, wuddaboud Mindless Behavior and the rioting “teens” at the mall in Chi-town?

http://www.suntimes.com/news/18448735-418/ford-city-mall-reopens-after-youths-mindless-behavior-melee.html

Just some youts who were makin’ bad choices.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 08:49:00

That story helps bolster the case for piping in classical music at malls instead of hip hop.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-02-25 10:37:16

There was a corner store in the hood (the Mission, before it was hip and expensive) that put speakers outside blasting classical music.

It worked. The guys quit hanging around the front of the store.

I think that store now sells baguette, fresh brewed kombucha, and artisanal bread.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-02-25 11:45:00

That story helps bolster the case for piping in classical music at malls instead of hip hop.

But we all know that merchants covet the “young” demographic.

I wonder if that will change since they’re all broke and up to their eyeballs in student loan debt.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-02-25 09:24:14

Posting this link is Racist®. Proceed directly to Diversity Training. Do not pass GO. Do not collect $200.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 10:25:27

I love our Pravda-ized media complex. Boy, are they EVER trying to suppress the news on incidents of this nature. It’s “teens” doing this stuff, yeah, like it’s a bunch of bobby-soxers in poodle skirts swooning en masse over some cute boy band.

But they needed 50, yes, FIFTY cop cars to get this under control.

 
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-02-25 14:03:52

Palmy, the real reason for describing these thugs as “youths” or “teens” in the media is that some group (led by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, perhaps?) will howl about discrimination, racial profiling etc. and file a lawsuit if they tell it like it is. Absolutely everyone knows what is not being said. Silence speaks volumes.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-02-25 14:41:05

“Social Justice” will not be achieved until Jesse scores another Anheuser-Busch distributorship for his kidz.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2013-02-25 07:06:52

just wondering if anyone here is familiar with the company Opower or the Home Energay Management industry as a whole?

long-term viable industry?

Comment by oxide
Comment by michael
2013-02-25 08:18:10

i actualy found that last night…i created an account…the price of the report was $ 3,900.

i think the industry as a whole is viable…Opower seems to be on the customer engagement and reporting side with a mobile app. their cloud software is able to determine a customer’s usage and then a report is sent to them comparing their usage to their neighbors and along with some “behavioral science” related thingy…able to influence the customer to become more energy efficient.

seems that smart technology is where it’s at in the Home Energy Management industry and not so much what Opower does…although they seem to be partnering quite abit with smart tech companies.

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-02-25 08:28:34

’smart technology is where it’s at’

It’s got to better than mediocre technology, or dull tech. This reminds me; the other day I was in the grocery store and I saw “Skinny Girl Margarita” for sale. Now that’s clever. I expect we’ll see “Hunk-A-Burning Love Beer.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 10:21:09

So how much does Opower charge for this near-invasion of privacy?

All this BS “behvioral science” isn’t going to do much good if people don’t have the cash to insulate attics or crawlspaces or upgrade the windows. Ridicule “cash for caulkers” if you will, but at least it did something tangible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-02-25 10:52:25

All this BS “behvioral science” isn’t going to do much good if people don’t have the cash to insulate attics or crawlspaces or upgrade the windows. Ridicule “cash for caulkers” if you will, but at least it did something tangible.

Which is what I’m dealing with right now. I’m trying to get certified as a green business in Tucson. The insulation/caulking parts cost money that I don’t have right now.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 07:39:07

Any type of advanced home energy management (which anything more than the thermostat) is already a viable industry and has been for almost 10 years, but like any industry, research your company of choice very thoroughly.

Almost all the top 20 cities have already switched most, to all, of their customers over to smart, RF meters for both water and power/gas. It is now up to the customers to advance as well and make sure the utiltiy companies aren’t stealing from them.

Digital thermostats (event he cheap ones from Big Box) were the first wave and are still the first line of home energy management.

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 08:43:57

Grandma was a pioneer at home energy management. She closed doors to rooms she wasn’t using and didn’t heat them. She wore warm clothes in the winter and kept the background heat low, except in the kitchen where you could warm up is you caught a chill. Drapes closed at night. No A/C, and a clothes line. She’d scold you if the burner on the stove was turned up so high that the flames were licking up the side of the pot. Before her time I suppose.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 08:54:25

Dad was similarly a pioneer in cost-saving home energy efficiency. He lectured any of us who turned up the thermostat too high in winter or down too low in summer. He steadfastly scolded anyone who didn’t turn out the lights after leaving the room. The habits he instilled, which carried over to my family, have probably saved us thousands of dollars over the years and would lead to significant reductions in fossil fuel emissions if everyone adopted these practices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:08:30

“Dad, I am cold”

“Put on a sweater”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 09:12:09

That’s my wife’s line nowadays…

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-02-25 09:49:56

Your home’s best energy-saving device is still the on-off switch. Use it.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-02-25 11:47:31

Dad was similarly a pioneer in cost-saving home energy efficiency. He lectured any of us who turned up the thermostat too high in winter or down too low in summer.

You guys had A/C when you were a kid? When I was a kid in the 60’s in SoCal, only rich people had A/C in their houses. Today, everyone has A/C.

 
Comment by redmondjp
2013-02-25 16:00:14

Well, we put central A/C in our home in eastern WA (similar climate to inland CA) in 1968, and it’s still working on its original freon charge too! Man was it a shock to go from triple-digits outside to 70 degrees inside though.

All of our rental units had swamp coolers, however (it was one of my jobs as a kid to get them functional in the spring and to winterize them in the fall).

 
Comment by rms
2013-02-25 22:42:18

“Man was it a shock to go from triple-digits outside to 70 degrees inside though.”

+1 I’m out in the Columbia Basin in Ephrata, and there’s maybe six weeks of temperate weather all year. Otherwise it’s too hot or cold.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 10:39:59

The biggest energy mgmt thing you can EVER do is have/get good insulation.

Next is high efficiency appliances.

Next is unplug the vampire crap. That little blue/red ready light on your stuff is sucking up a lot of combined power. (one or 3 doesn’t hurt)

Next is turn off your HVAC when not home except in extreme weather.

Next is plug the exterior cracks in your home.

Thank you. That will be $3000. Makes checks or money orders payable to me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 10:54:12

I would add:

Programmable Thermostat (turns down the heat when you are not home - some automatically by a movement sensor)

Maintain and clean HVAC regularly

Replacement of key windows or doors. Especially if gaps exists, loss of E value or face primary wind direction.

I laugh at those who spend $50,000 on a a solar or geo system.

They will never, ever make their money back - even with insane government tax breaks.

And you could have saved more money with the simple fixes.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-02-25 11:34:14

“Replacement of key windows or doors. Especially if gaps exists, loss of E value or face primary wind direction.”

We did that with a 15′, a 12′ and a 6′ slider in our new home. It made a remarkable difference. The 1960’s single paynes were energy suckers.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 12:48:11

Good additional suggestions, 2banana.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-02-25 14:04:51

2banana-

I bought a Nest Thermostat for my house…I’m a fan…not an evangelist, mind you, but a fan (I don’t see how anyone who has kids has a regular enough schedule to make the “learning” features all that great).

But, detecting that you are out of the house to turn off…cool.

Even better is the link to your smartphone…if you forget to turn off your heat before you leave, you can turn off heat remotely. And when you are coming back to town, if you are gone for an extended period, you can turn on before you get home to warm up the house above 50 degrees (just utilized this when coming back from vacation).

Also, smarter utilization of the fan…cool–it will continue to use the fan to blow hot/cool air even after the furnace/AC has shut down, to not lose that residual heating/cooling.

I’m willing to wager that I’ll make back the $250 pricetag within a couple of years, max.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-02-26 01:13:56

One week without AC, let alone electricity, and 80% of America would shrivel up and die.

I scoff at your candyarse thermostats and HVACs. A quick cold shower/bath in the summer and a nap on the passenger seat of the parked-in-the-sun car in the winter. Puzzys.

And for eco-stinginess, my mother (still) makes me look like a piker. Try three kids having to use the same tub of bathwater. Dishes washed in one sink and rinsed in another sink of water — despite a perfectly functional dishwasher sitting empty. She even had a room full of used paper bags, used wrapping paper and ribbon, used styrofoam cups– for heavens sake. Turn the heat on in winter? Forget it. And the button jars….

This was a woman married to a successful doctor.

 
 
 
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-02-25 07:40:20

Not sure about home energy management, but I think home automation is going to be huge.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 09:00:53

The hugeness of home automation has been just over the horizon for about fifty years already. Do you remember the Jetsons?

Comment by joe smith
2013-02-25 09:12:45

I don’t remember the Jetsons. However, I do know that you can have everything automated in your home for the “right price”. The problem right now is that the price is too high. I’m waiting for it to craaaater as it has with Smart TV’s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-02-25 11:49:38

So droids are going to:

Do your laundry, ironing, folding etc.?
Cook meals and clean the kitchen?
Pick up stuff and put it away?
Weed the yard?

Meet George Jetson!

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-02-25 11:54:12

I LOVE my roomba. And washing machine. And dishwasher.

Bring on the robots!

 
 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-02-25 10:38:25

Still waiting for my jetpack….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-02-25 11:41:31

The Jetson cartoon generation here.
We thought the flying cars would be here by now. What happened?

Gotta love a bed that pops you awake like a toaster. lol And Rosie, the robot maid was a doll.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by cactus
2013-02-25 16:27:34

Check out the home automation in this movie

Brazil a 1985 British science fiction fantasy film directed by Terry Gilliam

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-02-25 16:35:30

Brazil is one of my all time favorite films. Not all the automation worked very well, and he included government torture, false flag bombings.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-02-26 01:15:27

+1. Great flick.

 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 09:17:18

Beyond a programmable thermostat, what really needs to be automated in a house?

Comment by michael
2013-02-25 09:43:20

that’s what i am thinking alpha…or maybe a mobile app that lets you control it remotely.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 10:26:32

Dontcha know, we a multithousand dollar system to tell us when a $3.00 carton of milk is about to go bad.

I think ALL this stuff is just a cover to collect and sell our household consumption information.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-02-25 16:43:17

‘to collect and sell our household consumption information’

That’s already happening. These new electric meters can tell when you get home, how late you stay up, etc. And this data is being collected. What about those preferred shopping cards at the grocery store? Do you think anything is happening with that information?

But heck, why worry? After all, every single email, text, blog comment, and phone call is being recorded and stored in giant databases. We can trust the government with all this, right? Otherwise, people would stand up and demand the privacy guaranteed by law. Wouldn’t they?

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-02-25 22:10:38

I’d be flattered that somebody found my drivel interesting enough to spy on.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-02-25 22:21:09

‘I’d be flattered that somebody found my drivel interesting enough to spy on.’

Oh, you’re right. I for one welcome our government overlords. Like I said, we can trust the government, otherwise average people might grow a backbone and insist on the Bill of Rights being enforced. As it is, as long as we keep our discussions down to mindless drivel, we’ve got nothing to worry about. How about those Kardashians?

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-02-26 01:17:28

But…but…the terraists! Who will save us from the terraists?

 
 
Comment by vinceinwaukesha
2013-02-25 10:33:06

“really needs to be automated in a house”

“really”? Nothing, nothing at all. Whats nice to have, well that’s a whole different matter. Assuming you already have electricity and a home file server or other dedicated server computer, its really cheap to gradually roll out.

As for what I do at home, coming from a programming background I’ve had “misterhouse” doing all kinds of tasks for about a decade (or more now?) Its the kind of thing you set up with one X10 outdoor security light on your old fileserver and one little thing after another a decade later you’ve got 100+ insteon devices doing all manner of crazy things.

Primarily it acts like a ridiculously complicated atomic clock accurate timer. Like on days that I’m going to work when the sunrise today based on my lat/lon is more than 30 minutes in the future after the bedroom lights turn off, shortly after the kitchen lights turn on, turn on the outside lights to the garage and turn them off 5 minutes after either the kitchen lights turn off or the garage door closes or 5:35 am or sunrise whichever comes first.

This is pretty simple compared to my tropical fish tank light system which attempts to replicate tropical lighting based on season, etc. I am a “non-salt” molly owner. (Salt in the molly tank is something of an intense nearly religious controversy)

I do a lot of occupied sensing too. The zoned thermostat in the office cares a lot about if there is actually someone in there, and the setting of the lights care a lot about the elevation of the sun at this moment on this day.

At the lowest level I’ve done a lot of stupid virtual 3-way switch tricks over the years where non-3way switches and non-switched outlets get automagically connected to other switches. And a lot of mode switching, like the kids bedroom lights are shutting off on a school day when they leave for school, assuming they left them on.

You need a programming background for home automation, not because its complicated (its some of the simplest, clearest, cleanest perl code I’ve ever used) but because you need a programming mindset without which flowcharts and boolean algebra would be incomprehensible. If you can get over the hurdle of properly defining what you’re trying to do, which probably requires quite a bit of programming basic skills, then actually doing it is pretty easy with modern tools. Its certainly a lot easier than when I started out a long time ago. This is also why hiring an outside contractor to do your automation is a waste of time and money, because its unlikely he’s going to have any idea what you’d actually want, other than providing the grunt labor of wiring stuff up.

You also tend to find home automation VERY closely tied in with similar yet completely unrelated tech like whole house audio and security system which I also have. Some tie ins are pretty useful, like if the security system can tell the window is open and the inside temp is not too ridiculous then shut off the HVAC.

Early on, you learn that coding in easy to access exception control is very important. You don’t want HAL telling you that you can’t do that, when you really do want to.

Maybe the simplest way to describe it is my house does what I want it to, at a conceptual level beyond flipping switches. Instead of flipping a 3way switch at each end of the path from the house to garage on a work day every day, I wrote a program once a decade ago and haven’t touched those switches since. I still do have physical switches, I just don’t use them, I guess they’re a security blanket for me. Walk into the office and the lights adjust properly without my having to do it manually, etc. Lock the security system because we’re leaving and the HVAC does the “green” thing all hands off.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 10:43:57

Interesting. I’ve used x10 devices at work and am capable of doing what you are talking about, but find myself totally unmotivated to do it. It’s interesting to me that other people find it quite motivating and perhaps even entertaining.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 10:44:00

I get 90% of that with motion/light sensor lights and a programmable thermostat, with minimal programming.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-02-26 01:19:42

Or you could just open/close a window….

 
 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-02-25 10:40:20

what really needs to be automated in a house?

The truth is, some of us just really *like* gadgets. I don’t *need* any of my gadgets, but they are fun.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 10:57:56

I’d like my shower head to be hooked up to a thermostat. I’m tired of alternating between frigid cold or scalding hot water. It’s a bit too evocative of central banking policy for my taste…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 11:17:18

I’d like my shower head to be hooked up to a thermostat.
Products like this have been on the market for a long time. I’ve been using one at home for 20 years. Set the temp you like, and your shower water will stay very close to that. If the incoming cold water pressure shuts off, so will your shower, saving you from getting scorched. In more normal ops, the volume of the shower flow will change, but the temp will not.

 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-02-25 11:57:28

You missed the sprinker system. If you could automate to water the exact perfect amount for each zone and nothing more, then you’d save a lot of water and a not exactly small amount of money.

I’ve played with Mr House, but X10 switches are not very good in my opinion and a mix of ardudino and X10 is more time than my wife will let me spend on piddly projects.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 12:51:25

X10s are still around? And they haven’t improved?

Sheesh. How do they stay in business?

(first saw these about 20 years ago)

 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-02-25 13:45:24

X10s are still around? And they haven’t improved?

——-
No, they are still stymied by the fact that the current travels over electrical circuits which need to be built in a certain way to be reliable, and they are ’stateless’ in that the module can’t tell if they are on or off. It just sends a signal to do the opposite of the current state.

Once wifi and standard controllers (ambient temp, time, etc) are small enough to fit in standard electrical boxes and cheap enough for that to be a legit ask not a pricey upgrade, home automation will really take off.

They also need APIs since Creston/infineon whomever don’t make software that works with each other’s products.

 
Comment by vinceinwaukesha
2013-02-25 15:28:11

“and they are ’stateless’ in that the module can’t tell if they are on or off. It just sends a signal to do the opposite of the current state.”

that’s actually not true, the solution to the “missed code” problem is simply to send everything three (or more) times.

Its a stateful protocol by your definition in that there is an “on” and “off” code. Its stateless in the TCP vs UDP sense in that there used to be no feedback. Send and hope.

Toward the end of my X10 experiments they started to sell interrogatable devices which when appropriately poked would transmit their status back. So a smart enough system could set, test, set again if necessary. Those devices as I recall cost more than Insteon, which actually does work with a stateful protocol that resends at least 3 times until it gets an ack, and also is faster and larger address space. So I dropped X10 like a hot potatoe and have used insteon since then. They had a little capacitor problem or whatever around 2007 or so which was legendary but post that era they’re pretty good devices.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-02-25 14:06:26

Try looking up “Nest Thermostat”.

Former Apple iPod designer startup.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by hazard
2013-02-25 07:26:44

Now is Erin Andrews a racist or is Fitty a sexist?

Erin Andrews REJECTS 50 Cent’s kiss attempt (WATCH) - NASCAR …
http://aol.sportingnews.com/nascar/story/2013-02-25/daytona-500-erin-andrews-50-cent-kiss-video-fox-tv-danica-patrick-mark-martin - -

Comment by rms
2013-02-25 23:49:10

“Now is Erin Andrews a racist or is Fitty a sexist?”

In Seattle or San Francisco nobody would look twice, but they’re in the deep south where this teasing banter could ruin a career, or worse.

 
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-02-25 07:37:20

Yes, the DOJ is joining a FCA (false claims act) suit against Lance Armstrong, just as I’d predicted:

Attorneys watching the case said the lawsuit is the latest evidence of the DOJ’s willingness to push the False Claims Act into new territory, in this case targeting an individual with a sponsorship agreement, rather than a traditional government contractor.

“That’s a pretty aggressive approach. It’s an extension of the FCA to a sponsorship, and I’m not sure that’s been done before,” said Anthony Anikeeff, co-chair of the government contracts practice at Williams Mullen. “But it shows a continuing trend by the Justice Department to expand the reach of the False Claims Act into new areas.”

The decision to intervene was somewhat of a surprise to some, because the DOJ took its time and got several extensions before making its decision. But the intervention signals the DOJ’s confidence in the case, and its intent to use Armstrong’s celebrity status to take a high-profile warning shot aimed at others who commit fraud against the government, said Lori Pines, a partner Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.

“The DOJ wouldn’t want to create bad legal precedent that would somehow limit their use of the FCA, but I don’t see any real downside for them in intervening here,” Pines said. “Certainly this will help publicize the False Claims Act and how serious the DOJ is about using it as a tool to fight fraud against the government.”

The government’s intervention shows that it believes it can win the case or reach a favorable settlement, which would require an aggressive theory of damages. The government will likely argue that the entire contract was obtained by fraud, so the entire amount is invalid, according to Anikeeff.

http://www.law360.com/governmentcontracts/articles/417893?nl_pk=9d07ff26-0986-46de-917f-4b7f3ce1f9dc&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=governmentcontracts

BTW, DOJ pushing the boundaries of the FCA is *great news* for private law firms…

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-02-25 08:48:16

Martha Stewart Syndrome. Crush the celebrity and let the slimy bankers go free.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-02-25 11:51:40

Bingo.

 
 
Comment by snowgirl
2013-02-25 09:07:42

Does anyone else think the real story here is how much the Post Office was spending for this sponsorship? I thought they were bleeding money throughout this whole time period. Did the PO really have an awareness or market reach problem it needed their huge marketing budget to overcome?

Comment by joe smith
2013-02-25 09:21:24

The USPS had revenues of $64 Billion in 2012. That sponsorship was very small, especially when you consider it was over a ~10 year period.

Moreover, the reason that USPS “loses money” is because Congress (which loves political donations from UPS and FedEx) requires USPS to pre-fund its workers retirement healthcare, unlike what is required for any other federal agency.

The other reason the USPS “loses money” is because they are not allowed to run like a business. If they ran like a business, they’d restrict rural deliveries to a few days a week and probably discontinue package service to some areas entirely because the fee structure makes sense.

In other words, perhaps USPS should stop serving upstate NY, the upper Midwest, and the deep South except for a few days a week (or maybe entirely). They should be allowed to make business decisions, IMHO. Just like FedEx and UPS do.

Right now a lot of what USPS is a subsidy to rural America. The way to make money would be to use their infrastructure to deliver overnight mail between urban hubs (court filings, banking documents, etc) and delivery packages for e-commerce.

Conversely, people who live in rural areas should have to pay more for USPS services if they want to continue them. I’m tired of paying more for my mail to subsidize poors. But I’m even more tired of uninformed idiots interjecting scattershot opinions about what they “know” about the USPS. LULZy stuff, indeed.

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 09:34:19

Moreover, the reason that USPS “loses money” is because Congress (which loves political donations from UPS and FedEx) requires USPS to pre-fund its workers retirement healthcare, unlike what is required for any other federal agency.

Sounds like a great candidate for a hostile takeover by someone with the right connections once they’ve “failed”. Probably a lot of cash in that retirement fund ready to be liberated and “put to work”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 10:14:24

Probably a lot of cash in that retirement fund ready to be liberated and “put to work”.

Exactly. Lesson number 1 of the beginning of the corporate-takeover era was don’t have well-funded pension funds or the like. That was like wearing a huge diamond ring in the ghetto.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 10:53:53

And the USPS is probably the Hope Diamond.

 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 09:45:03

I’m tired of paying more for my mail to subsidize poors. But I’m even more tired of uninformed idiots interjecting scattershot opinions about what they “know” about the USPS.

The Postal Service is like the health care debate. Either it’s a useful government endeavor that should be funded regardless of cost because society finds it beneficial, or not, and let it operate and compete as a private entity.

Instead we get this bastardized health care monstrosity that is neither free-market based nor completely socialized. Seems the Postal Service is being given the same treatment: hold it accountable to profit/loss even though it is a government-funded entity with government-mandated rules.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2013-02-25 10:33:57

Instead we get this bastardized health care monstrosity that is neither free-market based nor completely socialized.

+10 we agree!

But this is what is known as a “public-private partnership.” Private sector always finds a way to capture any profit from the deal, while the taxpayer get the branchy end of the Joshua tree.

On the Post Office, I don’t see what’s wrong with less-frequent delivery… isn’t that how it happened a hundred years ago anyway. I guess rural residents could choose between either 3-day a week delivery or, if they want mail every day, they could get a post-office box at the nearest town larger than X population.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 10:54:54

the branchy end of the Joshua tree

That’s almost Oly-class poetry there.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 11:08:37

+1

 
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 11:21:11

On the Post Office, I don’t see what’s wrong with less-frequent delivery… isn’t that how it happened a hundred years ago anyway.
200 years ago, the recipient of a letter had to pay the carrier 25 cents to get delivery. This was at a time when an acre of land cost $1.25. Mail could take a couple of months to get from Connecticut to Ohio, assuming the postman didn’t get scalped by the Indians. Those were the good old days.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-02-25 22:44:48

The half cent is the smallest denomination of United States coin ever minted. First authorized by the Coinage Act of 1792 on April 2, 1792,[1] the coin was produced in the United States from 1793 to 1857. The half-cent piece was made of 100% copper and was valued at five milles, or one two-hundredth of a dollar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half_cent_%28United_States_coin%29

 
 
Comment by vinceinwaukesha
2013-02-25 10:53:40

“I’m tired of paying more for my mail to subsidize poors.”

There’s a networking effect where the value of the service you get scales with the number of people you could theoretically reach. Cutting off the least profitable half of the population would cut the value of the service by far more than just half. For example cutting off Cincinnati, OH sounds like a great idea 364 days of the year, at least to me… except for the one day I want to mail in my IRS tax return.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-02-26 01:33:04

And I’m tired of paying for your cheap, easy access to the internet, cable, cellular communications, hospital system, police and fire services, utilities, etc., all of which I pay taxes for, none of which I receive. Welcome to society, joe.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 09:31:23

Thay were told they needed to act like a business and improve their “brand.” Sponsorship of sports teams was one way to do it, and I think that they picked a fairly cheap way to get the major sponsorship. They also redesigned their logo and did a lot of advertising to try to win profitable overnight shipping work back from UPS and whoever.

The problem with the suit is that they are going to have a heck of a time proving any damages to the post office. Confirmation of the drug use came out years (has it been a decade?) since the post office sponsored LA’s team. He had a few others in between and some years off. He clearly violated the agreement, but has it really tarninshed the reputation of the post office?

If the contract has pre-defined damages in the terms and no restriction on the time after the violation when those damages can be recovered, then that shouldn’t be an issue as he has admitted it all in public. But if they have to prove damage to their reputation to recover anything? How are they even going to separate the damage done by sponsoring a team that cheated with people’s general feeling that the post office shouldn’t have been sponsoring a team at all (clearly not LA’s fault)?

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 10:57:00

Yeah. A decade.

And for me, that’s the biggest question of this whole thing.

Why so dman long? If the tests didn’t show he was cheating then, how you can you say he was cheating?

There’s a reason the Constitution bans ex-post facto laws and this a great example of what happens if you don’t.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 11:49:53

No, this is just an example of what happens when you have a contract and it takes a long time to find out that one of the clauses of that contract was violated.

The rule was there when they were sponsoring the team, they just didn’t know about the cheating.

There are laws limiting the time in which you can get caught breaking various types of criminal laws. A contract might have a similar limitation, but it doesn’t have to.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 12:55:58

I’m not talking about that part of this theater, but the fact that 7 years of tests didn’t show anything.

7 years in a ROW.

How DID that happen? How COULD it happen?

And the ONLY thing they could get after all these was a very questionable witness and STILL no real science.

I’m no Lance fan, but I know fish when I smell it.

 
Comment by Montana
2013-02-25 13:55:28

“How DID that happen? How COULD it happen?”

Timing. Also IIRC some blood was stored and the tests developed for the cutting-edge PEDs he was using came along later.

Also Tyler Hamilton was not the only witness, though maybe the most persistent.

 
Comment by Montana
2013-02-25 13:57:09

…oh, and I was a Lance fan…and he admitted to it anyway, on Oprah, or so I hear.

 
 
Comment by vinceinwaukesha
2013-02-25 11:18:40

“has it really tarninshed the reputation of the post office?”

Order 40 pounds of kitty litter over the internet via amazon prime free 2nd day air shipping. Now is a ‘roid using mailman hauling buckets of kitty litter down the street a positive or negative? Think about it… I’d get better service outta a ‘roid user. Maybe my mailman could carry two 40 pound buckets at a time if he did roids like Lance. And that would be good.

The only negative I can immediately come up with is the legendary “roid rage” combined with the distant historical habit of postal workers “goin’ postal”. I can’t remember the last postal worker who went postal, that kinda stuff only happens at schools now. “Now back in the day, sonny, we went postal at the post office not schools like you kids do now, and did I mention we walked uphill to school, in the snow, both ways?”

Now he could tarnish the rep by being really slow or getting lost on the way to the finish line or demanding more money each year or demand that he’ll never race on a sunday, fed holiday, or now saturdays. How about if he made the journalists interviewing him wait in line for more than an hour and only between 9am and 4:30pm weekdays and they get to pay to park too? And when the interviewing journalists finally step up to his interview counter he starts cross examining them “does this box contain any indian arrowheads, human remains, or glitter?” and about 50 other stupid questions. And sneer.

I think there’s a pretty big echo chamber for roids where no one really cares but everyone knows everyone else says they care, so as spineless roidless weaklings they say they care too. Sure, ruin your life and future and body and health in every way other than roids and thats A++ only the best for our modern gladiators, but just that one little thing, and suddenly its all bad, eh come on who really cares. Its not like they’re saints and perfectly healthy in every other area of their lives, so if they want the roids, let em. Its not like its going to ruin their drinking, womanizing, and hopelessly bad financial planning ANY WORSE. Don’t tell me it’ll destroy and shorten their lives, because as a group athletes already do an excellent job of that without the roids.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2013-02-25 08:03:51

Did the FED buy all the MBS that was made up of loans that countrywide originated? Is that why all these houses are able to sit with squatters in them and no payments being made? So in essence the original investors in the MBS got their money back and now the FED is taking the losses?

Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:12:38

Isn’t bigger and bigger government great!

Much better than the “bad old days” when we had a free market.

When the banks ate their bad loans.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 09:25:06

When the banks ate their bad loans.

After taking their profits,stiffing their depositors, and then reopening down the street under a different name, to do it again.

Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 10:42:40

1500 bankers went to jail in the S&L scandal.

Bankers used to routinely lose their jobs and bonuses for making too many bad loans.

Under obama - ZERO in jail. Trillions in bailout.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 10:58:31

Bullcrap. A quick Google shows thousands of prosecutions, just not the masterminds.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-02-25 11:52:50

Been doing my part to help this go viral:

Elizabeth Warren’s first grilling of regulators is a YouTube hit

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 20:16:55

1500 bankers went to jail in the S&L scandal.

Oh, you think that was a period of ‘free market’ banking? With FDIC insurance and the like?

I think you mean better-regulated banking, not free market banking. It was quite the opposite of free market.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 10:56:15

“After taking their profits,stiffing their depositors, and then reopening down the street under a different name, to do it again.”

That’s where tar and feathers come in handy, something the U.S. banking system is sorely lacking.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 09:34:37

Isn’t bigger and bigger government great!

That’s why I laugh at the libtards threatening that the sequester will “create long lines at the airports”, “create shortages of chicken”, etc. The world functioned just fine before the government had to inspect all the food and molest people boarding airplanes. How about we go back to less food inspections and less pat-downs instead of creating artificial barriers for daily life to continue?

God forbid we roll back the size and scope of what the government does as opposed to just cutting their budget…

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 10:57:57

The world functioned just fine before the government had to inspect all the food and molest people boarding airplanes.

I’m with you on the airplane thing. As far as food inspection goes, I’m sure it was more efficient to skip that but I don’t think I can give that a “just fine”. I’m willing to pay a little extra for clean fresh food. That’s way more efficient than me having to grow or kill and butcher it all myself.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 11:15:22

I’m willing to pay a little extra for clean fresh food.

The reason for the need for food inspections is in part the size and breadth of the food supply chain and the industrialization of food production.

If you buy local meat, poultry, fish and produce, not as much need for the government inspections. Heck, I know plenty of guys who hunt deer and have the carcasses turned into sausage by their local butcher. Think the Feds need to inspect that? Nope. Have my hunter friends ever gotten sick off of bad venison sausage? Nope…

My point is the Feds are threatening to shut down “essential services”. Well, guess what Feds? I don’t consider most of what you do “essential”. And that’s the whole point of the sequester…

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-02-25 11:21:50

The problem is, you will be paying the same price for horsemeat as you are for USDA prime.

Are you set up to lab test every package of hamburger to see if it has horse/deer/dog meat in it? Yeah, I didn’t think so.

Here’s the problem. The cheaters/skuzzballs will undercut the legit businesses, and put them out of business, before John Q Public every catches on. And once they control the market, the skuzzballs will have all of the money they need to buy off whoever they need to buy off the keep their operation running.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 11:23:11

My family has taken wild game to local butchers and done it themselves…ended up doing it themselves only for about the last 30 years due to suspicion that what they were getting back wasn’t the same thing they took in.

But anyway, getting rid of the inspections doesn’t seem like a good way to try to force people to go back to local food production even if you think that would be best. I consider it an essential service in today’s world. There are probably lots of other areas that I would agree with you on, though.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 11:36:29

Are you set up to lab test every package of hamburger to see if it has horse/deer/dog meat in it?

The government isn’t set up to do that currently. It also didn’t help the current EU issue with horsemeat in the beef supply chain and I’m sure the EU had plenty of inspectors working. Are you advocating for more money to .gov for more food inspections?

Here’s the problem. The cheaters/skuzzballs will undercut the legit businesses, and put them out of business

Then stop buying crap food produced on an industrial scale and start buying more local. You can pay more for your local sourced food and keep your local providers working or you can give more money to the government to babysit large corporations who might try and screw you. Take your pick.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-02-25 12:10:18

“Think the Feds need to inspect that?”

Hate to spoil your point, but butchers are inspected/certified by the FDA and/or DOA.

But thanks for once again highlighting the wet-dream of the Randian/Death-to-government train of thought. Which is believing we will be better off living a 19th century lifestyle.

There won’t be a lot of people around to maintain any of this high tech infrastructure, like transportation, the internet, you-name-it, if 90% of the citizenry has to revert to the farmer/hunter/gatherer lifestyle.

I, for one, think deer meat sucks. If it was any good, why do most guys I know have to turn it into jerky or sausage?

 
Comment by mathguy
2013-02-25 12:29:34

X-Gs could you elaborate on this? I thought the local butcher shops, even in vons/albertsons were under the regulation of the local county health and agricultrure dpeartments… when did the feds get involved there? Also, why does it need to be federal instead of county?

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-02-25 12:56:22

As there is two feet of snow on the ground, it’s gonna be hard to do any gardening.

And if everyone had to procure their animal protein by hunting, the local population of deer and turkeys would all be culled by now. I suppose I could fry up some guinea pigs, like they do in Peru, and had some gold dust to pay for them.

Yeah, sure, but I should have stocked up for the winter, you say? Okay, then cut my income by $15K….the amount I made on my part-time contract work last year.

Or find a wife who is good at canning, cooking raccoons, and making clothes by hand. Good-freaking luck with that.

All you guys need to sit down at the dinner table tonight, and tell the little women: “Honey, we’re going to simplify our lives….you need to quit the job that you went to college to get, and learn canning, butchering, making bread at home, doing laundry using a washboard, tending to the critters, and learning how to hitch the horses to a buggy. And don’t forget, Hobby Lobby has a class on rendering animal fat into candles and lamp oil. We’ll need to know how to do that too, once the whales are hunted close to extinction again….”

Lay that speech on the little woman tonight, and get back with us tomorrow with the replies……

The 21st century has sucked so far, but everything I know/read tells me I’m better off than if I had lived in the late 19th century.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 13:32:22

I, for one, think deer meat sucks. If it was any good, why do most guys I know have to turn it into jerky or sausage?

It helps if the back yard is an 80 acre corn field. Deer raised on corn are pretty good and can be used for about anything you’d use beef for. Deer that work for a living, maybe not so much. All I know for sure is that Pronghorn antelope that get by on sagebrush can be horrible. Elk from the mountains are kind of tough once they’re more than a couple of years old, but are OK. Kind of like your description of deer or maybe a little better.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 13:57:00

The 21st century has sucked so far, but everything I know/read tells me I’m better off than if I had lived in the late 19th century.

Buying more locally sourced food does not mean you need to spend you entire day (or your wife) hunting, canning, and preparing. You have a local butcher? Where does the butcher get his beef?

If I want fresh seafood, I can go to the seafood market right next to the docks in New Bedford or the big box grocery store. Guess who buys right off the boats in New Bedford and guess who buys frozen seafood from distributors sourced globally? And don’t tell me the Feds need to inspect the local seafood store, because they don’t and they aren’t. That’s a local health and safety inspection, not an FDA inspection…

Hell, we get eggs from my aunt and uncle who have chickens… they have more eggs than they know what to do with. Doesn’t require any more effort for us to pick up eggs from family than it does to buy them at the grocery store.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-02-25 14:10:01

When you get right down to it, all of this talk about going back to the 19th Century was of doing business, is code-talk for “Get rid of the 47%’s support apparatus, and the 47% will magically disappear” train of thought.

IOW, a sanitized, code-worded, media-friendly plan to despose of the “worthless breeders/eaters”; for those who don’t have the sack to advocate in public the full “Lebensraum/Pack them on ice floes, and tow them out to sea” plan.

Yeah, we’ll put all of them in their place. Those that can find some way to support themselves can and will. Go ahead and kill the minimum wage while your at it…….no sense paying anyone any more than they are economically “worth” (by whoever is appointed to decide this……..business?”).

Gonna be hard to get employees, when the cost of getting to work exceeds the pay, which is close to what is happening in a lot of places out here in Flyover.

The rest? Well give it six months, and the problem will take care of itself.

Just do it at the beginning of winter, when the plan will be the most effective, and the cold will keep the smell down.

Someone need to write a novel about what happens when the oligarchs/kleptocrats force the 47% into becoming societies of hunters/gatherers/Plains Indians and/or Mongol tribesman, when all of the land and animals are corporate owned, or killed off at a tactical move. Especially when the “Indians” are “tech-saavy” Indians.

See the future. Visit Nigeria.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-02-25 14:25:23

X-GSfixr, I just don’t see what you’re talking about. At no point in the history of the United States were we like Nigeria. At no point in time were people dying in the streets and stinking up the place because nobody cared and people were left to rot. We were never societies of hunters/gatherers/Plains Indians and/or Mongol tribesman, when all of the land and animals are corporate owned, or killed off at a tactical move. This all sounds like hyperbole - the same kind the government keeps trotting out to go with their self-made crises: “The world’s gonna end if you don’t do this thing now”. You might have some good points but they get lost in the forest…

By the way, if anybody comes up with sanitized, media-friendly code words, it’s the left…

 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-02-25 16:59:40

I do support regulators who monitor the food supply. I wouldn’t want to go back to the 19th century either.

But here’s one data point I’d like to get some information on: The sequester is not actually a spending decrease. It’s a reduction in the yearly increase in spending. So next year, the government is spending more. But not as much more as it would have.

Is that true? The answer, according to US News and World Report, is yes.

If so, then there is a lot of theater going on here, for both parties playing to their bases.

We were exposed to the theater when the Sequester was originally agreed to. CBS News noted that a majority of members of both parties voted for the 2011 Budget Control Act.

That was theater. They voted for the cuts but their cover story was that because they couldn’t agree, they’d put together a hyper-partisan group of politicians (the “Supercommittee”) who would then be more likely to undo the Sequester under penalty of the cuts they really don’t want (wink wink) going through.

Right.

Both sides are furiously trying to gain political advantage here, with the frothing Democrats in the MSM and the frothing Republicans on AM talk radio. Money is how politicians gain power and prestige and privilege. No politicians wants to limit his or her power.

More and more I’m thinking it’s theater.

Of course, it’s laudable that they try to reduce the government debt. But… with the Fed flexing it’s muscle, testing out the limits of its currency printing operations via unsterilized bond buys, it might be kind of moot.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-02-25 17:12:51

At no point in the history of the United States were we like Nigeria. At no point in time were people dying in the streets and stinking up the place because nobody cared and people were left to rot.

That may be true. Nevertheless, the typical American family had a much lower standard living 100 years ago. Just to take one example, there were a number of diseases that killed children under the age of five. Talk to Americans today, and most people would agree that the death of a child is probably the greatest tragedy that a parent could experience. In the 19th century and the early 20th century, it was not at all uncommon.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-02-25 17:41:56

the typical American family had a much lower standard living 100 years ago. Just to take one example, there were a number of diseases that killed children under the age of five. Talk to Americans today, and most people would agree that the death of a child is probably the greatest tragedy that a parent could experience. In the 19th century and the early 20th century, it was not at all uncommon.

I don’t think anybody was saying (I certainly wasn’t) that going back to the 19th Century way of doing business would mean that we also throw away all the scientific achievements and drugs and medicines, etc. that have been developed. This is just more hyperbole along the lines of “the world will end”.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 20:24:02

“Buy local, it will solve everything.”

And how will you know it’s really local, without inspections, etc?

Makes it hard to get a sandwich out of town, too.

 
 
 
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 09:54:14

I was doing securitization transactions on bank issued credit card debt in the early 90’s.

Your vision of free-market banking has been dead (except for credit unions and a small number of local banks) for decades.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 11:01:37

:lol: Right?

There sure are a lot of Rip Van Winkles who post here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 13:49:39

I’d also like to point out that credit card debt was some of the last debt to be securitized. Since a lot of the people who made decisions about bond purchases at mututal funds, insurance companies, etc. paid off their credit cards every month, it took a while for them to believe that there were enough people carrying large balances month after month after month that there was a way to put together a decent pool of stable debt to securitize.

By that time in the early 90’s all sorts of other bank generated debt was regularly securitized. And the stuff generated by manufacturers (financing sales of big equipment and cars) was almost all securitized. Ford Motor Credit did these deals all the time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-02-25 10:11:08

When was this? Are you a time traveler from another planet?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-02-25 11:54:26

Isn’t bigger and bigger government great!

The Federal Reserve isn’t a branch of the government, dude.

Comment by mathguy
2013-02-25 12:30:43

Whose treasuries does the Fed sell? Where does the Fed get it’s money to make asset purchases? Where does the authority to get that money come from?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by snowgirl
2013-02-25 09:13:19

Isn’t that essentially happened w/TARP especially w/the AIG bailout?

Wikipedia: AIG suffered a liquidity crisis when its credit ratings were downgraded below “AA” levels in September 2008. The United States Federal Reserve Bank on September 16, 2008 made available an $85 billion credit facility to the company to meet increased collateral obligations consequent to the credit rating downgrade, in exchange for the issuance of a stock warrant to the Federal Reserve Bank for 79.9% of the equity of AIG. The Federal Reserve Bank and the United States Treasury by May 2009 had increased the potential financial support to AIG, with the support of an investment of as much as $70 billion, a $60 billion credit line and $52.5 billion to buy mortgage-based assets owned or guaranteed by AIG, increasing the total amount available to as much as $182.5 billion.[7][8] AIG subsequently sold a number of its subsidiaries and other assets to pay down loans received, and continues to seek buyers of its assets.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 12:58:22

…and is currently suing the Gov for not bailing out them enough.

But they aren’t the 47%, ya know?

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 09:16:34

I suspect you are right on all counts, but don’t know where one would find the information. For some reason the Fed is exempt from the laws which require other federal government agencies to conduct their operations openly, subject to public scrutiny.

Note the beauty of the scheme, which is that if the Fed takes the losses, then no tax dollars are involved, as the Fed can create the money needed to cover the losses (e.g. to buy worthless MBS at a price of its own choosing) out of thin air.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-02-25 10:33:19

Note the beauty of the scheme, which is that if the Fed takes the losses, then no tax dollars are involved,

It is rather ingenious. They just need to maintain people’s faith in the currency. Arguably a system so cleverly devised may increase people’s faith in it.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 10:54:18

Since keeping people who stopped making payments in their homes serves to keep these homes off the market, supporting higher housing prices and offsetting deflationary pressures, there is even more to this policy for the Fed to like than first meets the eye.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-02-25 19:47:04

I think ultimately though, if the population at large gets wind that the Fed is printing money to spend as it sees fit, it will reduce faith in the value currency.

And faith in the currency is what keeps the entire show afloat. I don’t think it will be an immediate lurch, but a gradual movement.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 09:18:47

QE, like a water spigot, can vary in force
February 25, 2013, 11:08 AM

Investors should try to get used to the idea that the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program may work like a water spigot, with the central bank turning up or down the pace of purchases depending on the incoming information, but without shutting off the faucet completely.

At the moment, the Fed is talking about turning down or “tapering” the pace of the the asset purchases. According to the Wall Street Journal Monday, John Williams, the president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve believes this idea makes sense.

St. Louis Fed president James Bullard said in a speech last week that the faucet could work both ways — the Fed could add purchases if needed.

The Journal report also said that Fed officials are mulling a rethink of their June 2011 “exit strategy.” The strategy calls for the Fed to first start raising interest rates and then selling mortgage-related assets on its balance sheet, returning to the historical norm of keeping only Treasurys.

 
 
Comment by eight pieces of chicken
2013-02-25 08:12:44

It’s time for the percolator.

Jack Lew is the nominee for Treasury secretary whose own bonus as an investment banker was bailed out by the Treasury Department when it rescued Citigroup Inc. (C) in 2008. He owes much to America’s taxpayers. He should also be grateful to Citigroup for agreeing to let him rejoin the government without suffering much for it financially.

An intriguing revelation from Lew’s Senate confirmation hearing last week was that he stood to be paid handsomely by Citigroup if he left the company for a top U.S. government job, under his 2006 employment agreement with the bank. The wording of the pay provisions made it seem, at least to me, as if Citigroup might have agreed to pay Lew some sort of a bounty to seek out, and be appointed to, such a position.

Of course he is close to one of the biggest snakes in the grass in modern American history, Robert Rubin.

He joined Citigroup in 2006 as chief operating officer of its global wealth-management division. Lew was recommended by former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who at the time was chairman of Citigroup’s executive committee. (There seems to be an unwritten rule that every Treasury secretary must have deep ties to Rubin.)

Lew’s employment agreement with Citigroup said his “guaranteed incentive and retention award” wouldn’t be paid if he quit his job, with limited exceptions. One was if he left Citigroup “as a result of your acceptance of a full-time high level position with the United States government or regulatory body.”

A similar provision concerned his stock-based compensation. If Lew left in 2008 or afterward to accept a high-level U.S. government position, all of his outstanding equity awards, including restricted stock, would vest immediately, the document said.

When I asked Citigroup what its rationale was for including the government-service exception, a spokeswoman, Danielle Romero-Apsilos, said: “Citi routinely accommodates individuals who wish to leave the firm to pursue a position in government or nonprofit sector.” I pointed out that the contract terms I was asking about didn’t mention anything about a nonprofit, but she declined to elaborate on her statement.

Of course she did.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 11:04:50

“It’s a very exlcusive club, and YOU AIN’T IN IT!”

 
 
Comment by hazard
2013-02-25 08:28:29

Robert Swift is refusing to abandon his bullet-ridden, beer can-strewn foreclosed house
.
By Kelly DwyerFri, Feb 22, 2013 12:05 PM EST

Robert Swift’s short NBA career, sadly, produced more bad punchlines than it did productive seasons. The heavily-tattooed big man was drafted directly out of high school in 2004 and was a favorite amongst several well-respected NBA GMs, but his game never found a groove and he last played in the NBA back in 2009. After a stint in the NBA’s minor league and a jaunt playing professionally in Tokyo, Swift apparently has settled back in the Pacific Northwest, living in the same house he bought as a member of the Seattle SuperSonics.

His house was recently foreclosed upon, though, and the new owner would like Swift to abandon the property. Swift, according to the television station KOMO (via Deadspin) isn’t going anywhere. And the rubble surrounding Swift’s current squalor isn’t something you’d expect from someone that turned 27 two months ago. Watch:

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ball-dont-lie/robert-swift-refusing-abandon-bullet-ridden-beer-strewn-170507711–nba.html - 167k

Comment by eight pieces of chicken
2013-02-25 08:41:50

Let’s see where he spent most of his monies.

Government of various levels - Roughly 60%
Luxury items - 20%
Baby Mamas - 15%
Mortgage - 10%

The worse thing is he never got any gratification (sexual or other) from his largest beneficiary. Sad, truly sad.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:05:31

Give him a break.

He is a victim.

It is all the bank’s fault.

He was lied to. He didn’t understand the forms he was signing.

He needs a bailout to save his home. It is only fair. The banks got a bailout and so should he.

The sheriff is a racist if he comes to evict him.

We need OWS and Al and Jesse to start a protest march.

“We shall overcome some day…”

Comment by vinceinwaukesha
2013-02-25 10:59:37

“The sheriff is a racist if he comes to evict him.”

LOL I don’t follow sports much but even the shortest glance at the picture in the article would show he’s one of the relatively few white NBA players…

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 11:06:13

*snerk*

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 09:07:59

Do Wall Street traders really base their buy/sell decisions on Italian politics?

Bulletin U.S. blue chips follow suit after Italian rally fades
Investor Alert
Feb. 25, 2013, 10:10 a.m. EST
U.S. stocks rebound from weekly drop
By Kate Gibson, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks opened higher on Monday, with the S&P 500 index rebounding from its first weekly loss in eight, as Italians voted in general elections and on the belief Japan would move to stimulate its economy.

Italian stocks rose in the wake of reports that had initial exit polls giving the edge to center-left leader Pier Luigi Bersani over former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi in the nation’s parliamentary election.

“Many investors think that an Italy led by Berlusconi could return to a path of fiscal disaster,” said Fred Dickson, chief investment strategist at Davidson Cos., wrote in an email. See: Markets cheer signs Italy has shut down Berlusconi.

Equities climbed on speculation Japan’s prime minister would select a central bank head who supports stimulus.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA -0.06%) rose 61.35 points, or 0.4%, to 14,062.

The S&P 500 index (SPX -0.03%) added 8.36 points, or 0.6%, to 1,523.96.

Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:17:33

Here is how it works.

The Italians elect someone (conservative) who will tell the banks to eat their bad loans.

Then Italian banks default. Then the Spanish Banks. Then Greek. Portugal. French. Etc. (since they ALL loan to one another).

Europe then goes through a sharp and hard recession. The recession will spread to America.

Stocks get hammered.

We can’t have that.

That is the measure on how well the obama administration is doing - even according to obama.

Comment by eight pieces of chicken
2013-02-25 09:20:50

You are not that far off.

Had a conversation with a Obamabot yesterday. “Obama got the stock market higher than ever before, what else do you want?”

Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 09:37:27

Had a conversation with a Obamabot yesterday. “Obama got the stock market higher than ever before, what else do you want?”

LOL. Yeah, I hear the stock market in Zimbabwe is on a tear as well… as Ron White says: “You can’t fix stupid”, though I’m sure the libtards will tax us to fund an attempt. Oh, wait…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 11:15:18

I don’t hear anyone complaining about their stock investments…

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 11:25:11

Do you even hear yourself?

The 1%ers thank you for your support.

I don’t hear anyone complaining about their stock investments…

 
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 11:25:31

I don’t hear anyone complaining about their stock investments…
I stopped doing that in 2007.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-02-25 11:56:29

The 1%ers thank you for your support.

Whoa! Did you just say that?

There’s hope for you yet, tovarish.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 13:02:53

Did the market go up or not? Are you losing money like you did in 2007-2009?

Everyone knows I’m the first to point out the stock market is rigged, gamed and tilted.

But I have yet to hear anybody say they are currently losing money.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-02-25 22:36:35

I heard an investor on CNBC comment that the best performing stock market in the world over the past several years was Zimbabwe…but that now your entire portfolio will only buy 3 eggs…

 
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 22:54:51

now your entire portfolio will only buy 3 eggs…
But that’s really good, compared to a portfolio that can only buy a single mopane worm.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 12:58:28

Gold traders are sure loving something about the way markets are trending today. It took them only a week after a massive selloff to get back their mojo.

 
 
Comment by Brett
2013-02-25 09:11:55

Here’s a little condo I looked into back in 2008/2009…

MLS#: 9007274

Dec 15 2008 - $198,017
This home was foreclosed and bank-owned.

Back on the market on Friday, and it went ‘Pending’ the same day!
Feb 24 2013 - Pending
Feb 24 2013 - Listed (Active) - $275,000

Roughly $80k ‘appreciation’ or 40% of the sales price in Dec 08!

And based on today’s sales, this is a ’steal’

Comment by eight pieces of chicken
2013-02-25 09:22:29

Offer 300k with the letter you wrote, this house will be yours.

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-02-25 09:22:59

Hurry up and buy now, Brett. Even if you’re laid off in the next round of layoffs, maybe you can just live in the condo for a few years for free.

Comment by Brett
2013-02-25 10:11:58

I don’t believe people stay in foreclosed properties for long in Texas

“Texas foreclosures occur quickly. In just 60 days an uncontested foreclosure can be completed. If the lender seeks a delay or if the borrower contests the foreclosure or files for bankruptcy then it will take longer to foreclose on the property.”

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 11:16:30

…and you WILL forcibly evicted at gunpiont by law enforcement if need be.

No joke.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-02-25 09:18:55

So some of you over the weekend were wondering about investing in the stock market only on the highest gain days or lowest gain days.
No need to wonder about that. Yahoo and other sites offer historical stock price data that can answer that question. It’s great for all sorts of financial calculations, like monte carlo analysis or simple correlations and despite Yahoos many other limitations, I’m really happy they give it away for free.

So I downloaded the data for the S&P 500 and here are the greatest single day gains and largest single day losses since 2000: I used adjusted close because that normalizes for dividends.

So the columns are Date and percent gain from previous day.
Date Percent Gain from Previous Day
10/13/2008 0.11580036
10/28/2008 0.107890025
3/23/2009 0.07075754
11/13/2008 0.069212719
11/24/2008 0.064722573
3/10/2009 0.063663104
11/21/2008 0.063247568
7/24/2002 0.057327316
9/30/2008 0.054174726
7/29/2002 0.054078139

Date Percent Gain (Fixed)
10/15/2008 -0.090349796
12/1/2008 -0.089295278
9/29/2008 -0.088067784
10/9/2008 -0.076167076
11/20/2008 -0.067122914
8/8/2011 -0.066634428
11/19/2008 -0.061155601
10/22/2008 -0.061012512
4/14/2000 -0.058277971
10/7/2008 -0.057394809

2008 was a wild swinging year!

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 09:19:52

This is the obama housing bubble v2.0

Get in on the property ladder before you are priced out forever.

The 47% have spoken.

Forward.

Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 09:50:21

This is the obama housing bubble v2.0

Let’s examine the bubbles we can blame Obama for inflating or continuing to inflate:

Bond bubble, check.
Stock bubble, check.
Housing bubble, check.
Gun and ammo bubble, check.
Education bubble, check.
Fed Gov bubble, check.

I think we’ve reached peak bubble. Is there any bubble we’ve missed?

Comment by snowgirl
2013-02-25 09:59:18

Derivative bubble.

Credit bubble.

Comment by sfhomowner
2013-02-25 10:42:58

The Housing Market “Recovery” Is A Complete Myth

When you analyze the critical variables underlying the housing market, it leaves no doubt that the market is still fundamentally damaged and overvalued, with a very high probability that market has another serious decline ahead of it. Furthermore, housing stocks have completely dislocated from market fundamentals and investors who hold them risk a significant loss of capital once the equity market discounts the underlying fundamentals outlined below.

The housing market recovery that is perceived by investors and the public at large is a product of deceptively reported housing statistics and hyperbolic media reporting. The entities that report housing market data (Government agencies and housing market associations) take a lot of liberties with adjusting the data, often utilizing data massaging techniques such as “seasonal adjustments.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-02-25 11:02:15

Thanks for posting that. I notice they have a whole section in the article labeled “The illusion of low inventory”.

 
Comment by rms
2013-02-26 00:29:25

“When you analyze the critical variables underlying the housing market…”

Like ability to make PITI each month? Draconian.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-02-26 05:41:13

Nothing like poor analysis to exaggerate the problem…

Looking at Mark Hanson’s analysis (from a link in the article):

Let’s take his first number of 11.6 million in shadow inventory to work through (not his “ghost” inventory):

“1) 60-days late or in Foreclosure – 5 to 6 million units

2) short sales – 600k annually

3) modified legacy loans – 6 million (I call mods “new-vintage, higher-leverage, worse-than-Subprime loans). Mods redefault at a faster pace than legacy Subprime loans defaulted in 2006 to 2008. Once loans are modified everybody forgets that these borrowers remain more risky than legacy subprime borrowers…they simply forget about them. But with respect to default and short sale volume, this is an extremely important cohort track closely month to month.”

Now the reality.

1. “Normal” is approximately 2.5 million non-current. The most recent “non-current” count was 5.3 million total, so the excess was 2.8 million to work through, not 5-6 million. Hanson implies that ALL 5-6 million are shadow inventory. As said over, and over, and over again, the number of non-current loans won’t get anywhere close to 0, even in a robust market.

2. 600 short sales per year. Does he think that the 600k short sales are coming from borrowers who are current? No lender is going to approve a short sale if the borrower is still current. Adding anything here is double counting from #1.

Still at 2.8 million.

3. 6 million modified loans. Approximately 4 million of these loans were modified in 2010 and earlier, and have already re-defaulted (ie. included in the non-current loan count above, or were already short sold/foreclosed). Fannie Mae notes that 65% of their modifications from 24 months prior are still performing (implying a 35% default rate within 2 years). A full 25-30% of modifications redefault within 12 months, so what you are really looking at are how many modifications have happened in the last year, since 25-30% default in year one, and another 5-10% in year 2 (ie. the action is with the recent modifications). There were less than 1 million mods in 2012. I don’t know what the total additional defaults should be included for the future, but it sure ain’t 6 million (since most early mods have already redefaulated, many mid-aftermath mods are already included in the 5.3 million non-current loans, and many later mods that included principal reduction never will redefault).

Could it be another 1 million? Over time? Maybe. Another 2 million (key word being “another”)? That could be a stretch.

So, his 11.6 million of shadow inventory to potentially clear the market is more like 3.8 million–and, as I’ve said many times they aren’t evenly spread throughout the US. Some markets will be done within the next year…others will take YEARS beyond even his projection.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-02-26 19:02:41

Not that anyone is reading this anymore, but per LPS, approximately 50% of all foreclosures are REPEAT foreclosures, which stands to reason that approximately 50% of the excess non-current loans (ie. 50% of 2.8MM, or 1.4MM) are from re-defaulted modifications.

Which makes sense from a magnitude perspective.

So, add the redefaults that need to happen from the newest year or two of modifications (10% more for mods greater than 1 year, and 25% for newest mods), and you get another ~350,000 loans that need to re-default that aren’t already included in the non-current loan pool.

His 11.6MM of shadow inventory is more like 3.2 million…even when taking into account re-defaulting loan modifications.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 10:46:38

Health care bubble.
Insane public union bubble
Bankrupt cities bubbles
No bankers in jail bubble
Bailout any bank bubble
Kill list of Americans bubble
Drone strike of kids bubble

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 13:04:49

Double bubble
Toil and trouble

Fire burn
And cauldron bubble

 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
Comment by 2banana
2013-02-25 11:26:56

He is a democrat and from NJ.

He will just use the John Corzine defense.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 11:27:03

I think that practice can safely be called “Buy-sexuality”

Comment by palmetto
2013-02-25 11:32:40

OK, tresho, now that’s just too awesome right there, I don’t care who y’are!

Thanks for the laugh!

 
 
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 14:01:47

I can’t speak to any of the current accusations against Senator Menendez. I have no personal knowledge and no second or third hand knowledge either. And I’m not following the news coverage all that closely.

But he is a bit of jerk. Man ran off like a bat out of heck from the first anniversary of 9/11 in Hoboken which was in his Congressional district. Hoboken had a lot of people who worked at the WTC and a lot of losses. Most pols take a few minutes after something like that to offer a few words to people who are suffering. I’m not sure why people find comfort in that sort of thing from a complete stranger who happens to have won an election, but they do. He got the message that he had to be there. Didn’t get the message that he was meant to be there and to have a word or two with the people who were remembering what was likely the worst day (or one of the worst days) of their lives. I was in the chorus that sang that day. I tried to thank him for coming as I started to walk home and he ran away like I had thrown something at him.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-02-25 14:58:43

Yep. That’s “jerk” right there.

 
Comment by eight pieces of chicken
2013-02-25 15:10:35

Is there another kind of politician? I am convinced that politicians are the lowest of the forms, just a notch above banksters.

 
Comment by Resistor
Comment by Resistor
2013-02-25 17:32:16

I recall now. I think you lived in JC.

That makes you more bridge/tunnel than I was.

:razz:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by polly
2013-02-25 19:48:52

I think that plaza was a bit south of me, wasn’t it?

I was right over the Jersey entrance of the Holland tunnel.

I didn’t even get home until the next day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Resistor
2013-02-25 21:34:42

North.

Hoboken, Pier A.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-02-25 16:38:58

For those who don’t keep track of the latest “move/counter-move” in the gun control debate, here’s the latest:

Firearms companies ranging from gun shops to machinists are joining forces to oppose new gun control laws. Some are threatening to move away from states that crack down on guns, others are refusing to sell gear to police that can’t be sold to citizens.

See the article here.

THE LATEST COMPLETE LIST OF GUN MAKERS & SELLERS SAYING ‘NO!’ TO LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ANTI-2ND AMENDMENT STATES

See the article here.

A number of firearms-related companies have said that they will no longer do business with any government organization of any state that enacts laws curtailing 2nd Amendment rights. Previously, law enforcement, for example, would be exempt from sales bans for things like “Non-compliant Assault Weapons” and “High-capacity Magazines”. No longer. These patriotic companies, ranging from retailers like Midway USA to manufacturers like Barret Firearms have said they will boycott those states and their business going forward.

Additionally, Magpul, a manufacturer based in Colorado, has threatened to move to a “freedom-loving state” if Colorado passes new gun legislation. While Magpul only employs 200 or so, it does over $18 million in business with suppliers in Colorado.

And don’t think gun-rights supporters haven’t noticed. I for one support these companies and what they are doing and will provide patronage in the future to reward their efforts. Now our efforts are aimed at getting a large company like Smith & Wesson, Ruger, Springfield, Colt, Glock, or Sig Sauer to join. Cripple law enforcement in these ban-happy states and we’ll see the politicians change their tune real quick… the list is up to 67 companies and growing.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 18:37:13

Dang! I just knew I should have bought a home at the bottom. Look now: Housing keeps going up and up, and stocks fall almost every day. Obviously these markets are now divergently decoupled, right?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-02-25 18:40:40

Everything except housing always goes down!

Asian Stocks Fall on Italian Election Concern; Yen, Oil Decline
By Richard Frost & Adam Haigh - Feb 25, 2013 4:38 PM PT

Asian stocks fell for the first time in three days on concern Italy’s elections will lead to renewed turmoil in European markets. The yen weakened, following its biggest gain since May 2010, and oil declined.

The MSCI Asia Pacific Index lost 0.4 percent as of 9:24 a.m. in Tokyo. The yen slid 0.8 percent to 92.51 per dollar after surging 1.7 percent yesterday. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average (NKY) dropped 2.1 percent from its highest close since September 2008. Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures added 0.2 percent. Ten-year Treasury yields rose two basis points to 1.88 percent, after declining 10 basis points yesterday. Crude retreated 1 percent in New York.

Italy may require another vote after partial election results suggested the four-way race may end in a divided parliament, an aide to Democratic Party candidate Pier Luigi Bersani said. Bersani, who led in opinion polls throughout the race, campaigned to maintain the budget rigor of outgoing Prime Minister Mario Monti. U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is due to testify before lawmakers today and tomorrow.

“Uncertainty about the Italian election result has sparked fears that they may abandon their austerity drive, possibly sparking another bout of volatility in Europe,” said Matthew Sherwood, head of investment market research in Sydney at Perpetual Investments, which manages about $25 billion. This may “make governing and implementing much-needed economic reforms almost impossible.”

About 10 stocks dropped for each that rose on MSCI’s Asia Pacific Index (MXAPJ), with materials producers and financial companies leading declines.

U.S. Data

The S&P 500 sank 1.8 percent yesterday, after recording its first weekly loss of the year in the period ended Feb. 22. U.S. data scheduled for this week includes the Institute for Supply Management’s factory index as well as official reports on durable goods orders, household spending and fourth-quarter economic growth.

U.S. Commerce Department data due at 10 a.m. today in Washington may show new-home sales climbed in January, according to a Bloomberg survey. Home prices in 20 U.S. cities probably rose 6.6 percent in December from a year earlier, the biggest increase since July 2006. The S&P/Case-Shiller index is released at 9 a.m. in New York.

 
Comment by azdude
2013-02-25 18:55:34

get on board dude. hedge funds and banks need to unload some stock on your dime.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 23:24:46

Actually I’m thinking it might soon be a good chance for dips to buy stocks. Based on today’s action, it seems like quite the sh!t storm is brewing. Hang on for the ride!

 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 20:49:18

Lucky Ducks making millions off illegal can smuggling

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan lawmakers want to crack down on can and bottle smugglers they say are scamming Michigan for undeserved recycling refunds, corrupting a generous 10-cent per container payback policy once infamously portrayed in a “Seinfeld” episode and which beverage officials now claim costs the state millions of dollars annually.

“Seinfeld” characters Kramer and Newman failed miserably in their comedic attempt to cash in on the refund, when they loaded a mail truck full of cans and bottles in New York and attempted to drive them to Michigan. But lawmakers say it’s a serious problem, especially in border counties, and they want to toughen penalties on people who try to return unmarked, out-of-state cans and bottles for refunds….Despite their best efforts to clamp down on fraudulent bottles, a federal lawsuit may shake things up even more. In 2012, a federal appeals court in Cincinnati struck down the Michigan law that makes beverage companies put a special mark on cans sold in the state. It said the Michigan law is illegally affecting interstate commerce by dictating where cans can be distributed.

Joy Yearout, spokeswoman for Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, said the office has requested a stay on the ruling and plans to file a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court in April.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-02-25 22:44:11

Venison-gate in Louisiana: State agency destroys donated deer meat to save the hungry from having to eat it

The decision last week by a bureaucrat at Louisiana’s Department of Health and Hospitals to dump $8,000 worth of donated deer meat intended for use at the Shreveport/Bossier Rescue Mission, based on a peculiar interpretation of the state’s Sanitary Code, has blown up into a full-scale scandal.

I wonder if this was the same state agency that thought it was fine for the now-permanently closed New Orleans Charity Hospital to keep its emergency generators below sea level, to not have a helicopter pad, and to not have an emergency evacuation plan in case of flooding?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2013-02-25 23:34:40

It’s warming up nice and early this year, which makes me feel like coming out of hibernation soon. I wonder how the markets are shaping up. Is it a good year to be a bear?

VIX: Fear we go again?

It’s starting to feel a lot like the hyper-volatile days of August 2011, when concerns about Europe and U.S. political infighting prompted the Dow to dump 200 points in a day and goosed the so-called fear index.
• U.S. stocks dive after Italy votes | After Hours: Autodesk down on outlook | Fear index jumps 35%

Fear we go: Is VIX jump déjà vu all over again?
February 25, 2013, 6:29 PM

It’s starting to feel a lot like the hyper-volatile days of August 2011 when concerns about Europe and U.S. political infighting prompted the blue chips to dump 200 points in a day and goosed the so-called fear index.

That’s what happened Monday when the CBOE Volatility Index VIX +34.02% jumped 34% to 18.99, its biggest one-day percentage gain 18 months, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA -1.55%) fell 216.40 points, or 1.6%, to close at 13,784.17, its worst day of 2013.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2013-02-25 23:41:47

How long from now until when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are shut down, to stem the rape of the American taxpayers who are forced, without a vote in the matter, to federally insure their loans?

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 23:43:50

As long as the Fed is buying these MBS with its QE3 purchase program, where is the concern?

Financial Times
February 26, 2013 12:09 am
Risk concerns raised over mortgage bonds
By Tracy Alloway and Tom Braithwaite in New York

US banks are marketing mortgage bonds with new features that shield them from having to buy back defective loans, potentially raising risks for investors, two credit rating agencies have warned.

US regulators have been trying to revive the market for mortgage-backed securities by limiting the obligation of banks and other issuers to buy back faulty loans.

But a Fitch Ratings report last week said new private-label mortgage-backed securities (MBS) – mortgage bonds that are not backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, the government-controlled housing companies – include features that go beyond the limits set by regulators.

“Fitch has been approached with a multitude of [legal mechanisms in private-label MBS] that substantially differ from its criteria,” the agency said.

Moody’s said in a report Monday that such provisions may lead to lower credit ratings even if the underlying loans are high quality.

The bulk of private-label MBS sold since the financial crisis has been issued by Redwood Trust, a Californian mortgage manager and investor, and Swiss bank Credit Suisse.

JPMorgan Chase is among the banks marketing a private-label deal, according to a person familiar with the placement. The bank declined to comment on the deal

Both Moody’s and Fitch said the legal provisions in Redwood’s private-label MBS deals met their criteria for protecting investors. Redwood said in a letter to investors last week it intends to sell about $7bn of private-label MBS this year, up from about $2.3bn in 2012. Rating agency Standard & Poor’s said total private-label MBS sales could rise from $6bn in 2012 to $15bn in 2013.

Suzanne Mistretta, lead author of last week’s Fitch report, said the rating agency had seen about half a dozen deals in recent months with worrying legal features. “It appears that this may be the trend going forward,” she said.

Those features include so-called “sunset provisions” that limit the amount of time banks are on the hook to buy back fraudulent loans.

A new framework from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limits repurchase demands for certain loans if a borrower makes 36 consecutive monthly payments.

However, some new private-label MBS deals limit the buyback period to as early as 18 to 24 months, Fitch said.

“They want to reduce their repurchase liability,” Ms Mistretta said in an interview. “They probably have a sense of the likelihood of something going into default within 18 months.”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-02-25 23:48:44

Bipartisan group lays out plan to shutter Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
By Margaret Chadbourn
February 25, 2013 8:14 PM GMT

A bipartisan panel called on Monday for winding down government-controlled mortgage finance firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as part of an effort to have private lenders take on more of the risk of supplying credit to the U.S. housing market.

The proposal from the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington-based think tank, aims to jump-start a stalled debate on the government’s role in housing and help build a consensus for change.

Under the plan, banks and other private companies would take the lead not only in originating mortgages, but in issuing mortgage-backed securities as well.

Those firms and private insurers would then bear the risks of default, except in extreme cases when they are unable to absorb further losses, in which case a “public guarantor” funded by premium payments would provide a backstop.

“The problems in housing remain both severe and urgent,” said former Senator George Mitchell, a Democrat who co-chaired the panel. “We think this proposal is a good basis to begin a national discussion and to get it on the radar screen.”

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders and repackage them as securities for investors, which they guarantee. The firms were seized by the government in 2008 as mortgage losses threatened their solvency, and they have since drawn almost $190 billion from the U.S. Treasury.

The latest proposal, which was pulled together over the last 16 months by a 21-member commission of retired lawmakers and former housing officials, would attempt to shrink the government’s footprint in housing and have private capital play a larger role, a process that promises to take years.

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration currently back nearly nine of 10 new mortgages. At a news conference to unveil the report, members of the commission said winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be a five to seven-year process.

A Treasury Department official said the White House hopes the proposal moves the debate on housing finance reform forward and helps build a political consensus for change.

However, with Congress focused on budget debates and with immigration and gun control top priorities, action on housing is not likely to come until at least 2014. After years of red ink, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now profitable and the housing market is recovering, taking away the urgency for action.

Still, both Democrats and Republicans generally agree the system needs to change.

“A greater federal intervention was necessary when the housing market collapsed, but the dominant position of the government which currently exists is unsustainable,” said panel co-chairman Mel Martinez, a former Republican senator and U.S. housing secretary.

In a first step to open the door wider for private capital, the report said Congress should gradually reduce the loan limits for government-guaranteed mortgages. It suggests limits of about $275,000 for loans eligible for government backing, down from $417,000.

Later, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be replaced with a public entity that would provide a limited and explicit government guarantee for mortgage-backed securities, but would only step in if private companies were unable to cover losses.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post