March 8, 2013

Our Broken Housing Market

It’s Friday desk clearing time for this blogger. “A scarcity of homes for sale and record-low mortgage rates are setting up for a bullish real estate market, Zelman & Associates CEO Ivy Zelman said on CNBC. ‘I think we’re in nirvana for housing,’ she said. ‘I’m probably the most bullish I’ve ever been fundamentally. On ‘Fast Money,’ Zelman likened consumer sentiment to a battleship pointing down for the past several years. ‘And then the inventory cleared, the blight goes away, consumers feel better and now it’s really this urgency to go find a house,’ she said. ‘I’ll tell you, there are Realtors blanketing neighborhoods, asking people to sell their homes.’”

“Consumers buying a foreclosed home in the Winston-Salem area got on average a 30.4 percent price discount in 2012, according to a RealtyTrac report. Many large and community banks serving the Triad said in recent earnings reports they pushed more unsalvageable foreclosures and nonperforming assets through their loan portfolios in 2012. Their goal: bolstering their chances at profitability in 2013 since their loan-loss provision directly affects their bottom lines.”

“‘We’re still seeing banks dribbling out their foreclosed properties,’ said Rick Epperson, president of Weichert Realtors-Triad Associates in Winston-Salem. ‘If the economy cooperates, I expect they will ease out as many homes each quarter as they feel the housing market can absorb.’”

“Phil Harlan, practicing broker at Keller Williams Olympia, said agents throughout the South Sound are aware of the shadow inventory and will continue to watch the situation. He agrees if the banks dumped their entire inventory, it would depress the market. He believes, however, that the evidence says they won’t be doing so. Harlan used Thurston County as an example. The county has 278 bank-owned properties, only 66 of which are on the market. ‘They are recognizing the foundation, at least in this area, is firming up and they can put a few more on without hurting the market,’ he said.”

“Sharon Wilson, a broker with ReMax Professionals Tacoma, doesn’t believe the banks are keeping their housing inventory off the market to benefit the public. ‘Whatever they do will be very good for them,’ she said.”

“Florida’s court system is looking for more money to pay for judges to help reduce the foreclosure backlog. Court administrator Lisa Goodner said foreclosure filings aren’t projected to come down to normal levels until the 2016-2017 fiscal year. She pointed to stalling lenders unmotivated to move cases along and hefty paperwork as the main reasons for delays.”

“‘Two major issues that the circuits report to us that continue to cause delay in these cases – one is that the plaintiffs in these cases do not have any sense of urgency to move the cases forward,’ Goodner said. ‘The other challenge that we still face is paperwork problems.’”

“Bank of Ireland reported a loss of €2.16bn in 2012 following a ‘challenging’ year for the bank which saw mortgage arrears rise. The latest loss was up from €190m a year earlier. The bank said mortgage arrears continued to increase in 2012 but the pace slowed. The figures remain stark, however. The bank said that 9.9pc of home loans for owner- occupiers are in arrears, compared to 23.4pc of buy-to-let mortgages.”

“The bank expects to carry out more repossessions of buy-to-let properties once the Government acts on a promise to update legislation to give banks more freedom to seize houses over unpaid debts. Bank of Ireland hopes to avoid, as far as possible, repossession of family homes, chief executive Richie Boucher said. The fall in house prices is estimated to be 55pc since the boom, he said.”

“Immigrant buying patterns are driving the luxury market, said Dan Scarrow, VP at Macdonald Realty. Scarrow works with realtors and individuals from mainland China who are looking for homes and may need help communicating. ‘For the past few years, we’ve seen lots of new investor-class immigrants coming into the market,’ Scarrow said. ‘… They’re not just buying a house for themselves, but also three or four residential investment properties as well.’”

“This ‘exuberance’ among immigrant buyers has slowed, Scarrow said, as the economy slowed in China and prices rose rapidly in Vancouver. ‘In 2011 the perception among investors — a lot of whom are from Mainland China, where the economic system was going crazy for the last 10 years — (was) extremely (positive). They brought that sentiment here when they immigrated here and it resulted in this big uptick in the real estate market here. But in the last two years, housing prices here have gone up a lot, so a lot of investors see that there is not that much more room in the short term for it to go much higher.’”

“Dubai’s Emaar Properties on Saturday sold units in The Address Residence Sky View project at an average price of Dh2,600 per square feet, investors, who purchased units in the tower, said. ‘We bought properties in the project for Dh2,600 per square foot,’ an investor, who bought properties, said on conditions of anonymity. He added: ‘We were told that all the units in the project released in Dubai had been sold out.’”

“Last week, the developer said it had closed on-line registration for the project in less than one hour following ‘phenomenal’ investor interest for the residences and serviced apartments in the project. Emaar.com had recorded visitor traffic from more than 75 countries.”

“Nairobi’s skyline is changing, propelled by multinationals setting up regional offices and a growing demand for high-end housing. Ravi Vasta, managing director of Mark Properties, told How we made it in Africa’s Dinfin Mulupi how an influx of expatriates and diplomats is spurring demand for unique real estate projects in Nairobi and his ambition to develop the tallest building in East Africa. Q:Describe the market response since the launch of Le’ Mac. A: We have placed six floors of one to three bedroom residential [apartments] on the market, the majority of which is sold out.”

Q: What kind of buyers are you targeting? A: About 90% of the people who have bought the residential spaces are doing so for investment purposes. They don’t want to live there themselves. The majority of the buyers are local investors and the diaspora. They would like to own property, but the price of land in preferred locations for these kind of investments is too expensive. For instance, in [Nairobi’s] Westlands [area], you would need nearly 100 million shillings ($1.15 million) to purchase a quarter an acre of land.”

“Q: You focus on luxury properties while research is showing saturation in this market. Your thoughts on this? A: There is still demand for luxury projects especially as an investment proposal.”

“The first name in luxury crystal now wants to be the ritziest name in city real estate. Baccarat, which has been making its namesake glass since the days of Louis XV, is launching a hotel and condo complex in a sleek 50-story tower on W. 53rd St. Homes range in price from $3.5 million for a one-bedroom to $60 million for a duplex penthouse atop the tower. Baccarat Hotel & Residence is being built on the site of the former Mid-Manhattan branch of the New York Public Library.”

“‘People will come from all over the world to see this hotel and building,’ said Barry Sternlicht, whose Starwood Capital Group owns Baccarat, mentioning that some are already in contract. ‘This whole project oozes sex and money,’ said a broker associated with the building.”

“Nevada has spent only 11 percent of the money it received through the Obama administration’s Hardest Hit Fund, according to the analysis of U.S. Treasury reports from the third quarter of 2012, the most recent available. Sharon Logue discovered the Hardest Hit Fund in August. In January, she was approved to receive $50,000 in principal reductions, but she has run into the same PMI roadblock as she did when she tried to refinance. All the bank representatives were willing to tell her is that she is blocked from any action because of who the PMI is with or the type of PMI. ‘I’m at a block,’ she said. ‘ … Something needs to happen or else I’ll be stuck.’”

“She bought her Carson City apartment at the peak of the market almost six years ago. It was all she could afford at the time with the skyrocketing home prices at the time. Six years later, her home is worth 30 percent of what she originally bought it for. After a job change last year and decrease in salary, her mortgage payments make up nearly half of her paychecks. ‘I thought I was doing great, but then things just went downhill,’ she said.”

“Victor Joecks, with the Nevada Policy Research Institute think tank, said the only people who benefit from the program are the politicians who use it to generate publicity. The institute is against the Hardest Hit Fund program because it believes it is unjust, he said. ‘It’s a perfect case study of how the government promises something, and it doesn’t end up being delivered as promised,’ Joecks said. ‘The Hardest Hit Fund rewards those who make poor financial decisions at the expense of those who make good ones.’”

“I own a 1890 Victorian wood home in Cleveland’s Detroit Shoreway neighborhood–considered up-and-coming, in the Cleveland way. Even though my house is newly renovated, it was recently appraised for $60,000. That seems sorta great. But owning a home worth $60,000 puts a person in a tough spot, even if they owe less than that, as I do. Here’s why: the parts that go into building–and, crucially, maintaining–a house in any market cost more than $60,000.”

“People who own $50,000 homes in Cleveland might not be able to borrow the money to fix their roof if something goes wrong, even if they make a fair amount of money. Banks just don’t see these properties as a good bet. I know this for a fact because I can’t get a bank to loan me a dime. Even though my credit score is considered good. Even though my annual salary is close to the remaining balance on my home. It’s not a matter of credit or income: it’s simply the appraisal, they tell me.”

“The upshot is, banks or real estate agencies aren’t going to help you out if you want to buy a low-cost fixer upper in Cleveland. These two industries teamed up over the last few decades to produce our fundamentally broken housing market and they aren’t giving up now. They want to put you in the most expensive house you can possibly afford. A ‘new build’ if possible–all the better for folks trying to make a quick buck–on a former farm field, far away from every conceivable amenity, save a television set, a Walmart, and an interchange.”

“It’s sad, because the lesson of this housing bust, in my opinion, was BUY A CHEAPER HOUSE THAN YOU CAN AFFORD, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. But if you want to do so, you’d better have cash.”




RSS feed

39 Comments »

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-08 08:03:47

CNBC is pimping hard.

Zelman had the entire stage yesterday, Cramer picked up today.

Want the truth?

Search for Carolyn Baum’s Bloomberg discussion yesterday.

Comment by michael
2013-03-08 08:48:15

i only see one from today and 2 on march 6:

“Low Inflation Alone Can’t Deliver Promised Land”

and

“Hold the Obituary on Manufacturing”

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-08 09:43:43

Did Zelman get stupid since starting up her own firm? Or is she just talking her book?

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-08 09:57:17

“Consulting” income always seems to change things.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2013-03-08 18:50:07

It’s sad to see people resort to lying through their teeth for money.

Comment by rms
2013-03-09 00:51:27

“”And then the inventory cleared, the blight goes away, consumers feel better and now it’s really this urgency to go find a house,” she said. “I’ll tell you, there are Realtors blanketing neighborhoods, asking people to sell their homes.”

Zelman is a shameless shill commission junkie looking to destroy feckless young families who are trying to get started in life. CNBC has really lowered the honesty bar. Disgusting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Montana
2013-03-08 11:21:52

Kinda funny to watch Kernan’s expression though…like he’s constantly wondering, how can stocks keep going up? wtf?

 
 
Comment by scdave
2013-03-08 08:45:02

Thanks for the great research & postings Ben…

Shaking my head with this quote;

‘This whole project oozes sex and money,’ said a broker associated with the building.”

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-03-08 08:55:30

‘$3.5 million for a one-bedroom’

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-08 10:12:12

‘This whole project oozes sex…’

Of the prison variety.

 
 
Comment by snake charmer
2013-03-08 10:12:07

The artist’s rendition looks hideous. To me, anyway. It does have a vaguely phallic appearance, so maybe that’s where the sex reference is coming from.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-03-08 09:11:45

Because NO ONE saves anymore.

Not even a few thousand for a roof. Not even for an emergency.

Thank you obama and ben for the 0.0001% interest rates…

“People who own $50,000 homes in Cleveland might not be able to borrow the money to fix their roof if something goes wrong, even if they make a fair amount of money.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-08 09:44:56

Why do you always blame the low rates on Obama? Doesn’t the FOMC set interest rates?

And BTW, Ben Bernanke is a Republican.

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-03-08 10:14:59

Party politics aside, there isn’t any question about the systems bias toward higher house prices.

‘They want to put you in the most expensive house you can possibly afford. A ‘new build’ if possible–all the better for folks trying to make a quick buck–on a former farm field’

Here we have a person trying to keep up an older existing house and can’t get a loan. But then we have this:

‘In January, she was approved to receive $50,000 in principal reductions, but she has run into the same PMI roadblock’ ..She bought her Carson City apartment at the peak of the market almost six years ago. It was all she could afford at the time with the skyrocketing home prices at the time. Six years later, her home is worth 30 percent of what she originally bought it for. After a job change last year and decrease in salary, her mortgage payments make up nearly half of her paychecks.’

So the government will get involved to attempt to gift 50k off this loan, but someone trying to keep an old house in liveable condition can’t even borrow money he/she pledges to pay back! This is all so terribly screwed up, it’s hard to describe.

Why can’t people in DC at least contemplate a world where houses don’t cost an arm and a leg. That a downpayment of 20% wouldn’t be so hard to save. Where houses were affordable enough that paying a fair rate of interest wouldn’t be a burden, so savers could actually earn a little something for their sacrifice. It isn’t hard to imagine that the amount of earnings we would have left over in such a world would free us up to do all sorts of better things with our lives. Much better than slaving away to pay the lenders interest.

Comment by GrizzlyBear
2013-03-08 18:57:09

“Why can’t people in DC at least contemplate a world where houses don’t cost an arm and a leg.”

Because they are heavily vested in real estate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-08 10:21:43

“And BTW, Ben Bernanke is a Republican.”

They’re all just puppets. We have blue puppets and red puppets. The red puppet team actually ran a (minor) puppeteer as its candidate for the top puppet job last fall. And still people focused on the color of the puppet and not what goes on behind the puppet curtain. Smart people would watch the puppeteers. There are not many smart people in America these days, just people cheering and jeering for the red or blue puppets. Wash, rinse, repeat.

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-03-08 11:03:39

‘people cheering and jeering for the red or blue puppets’

Every once in a while something interesting happens:

‘Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is continuing to criticize his fellow Republicans for their filibuster of incoming CIA Director John O. Brennan over drone policy. In an interview with the Huffington Post, McCain referred to Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) as “wackos.”

“They were elected, nobody believes that there was a corrupt election, anything else,” McCain said. “But I also think that when, you know, it’s always the wacko birds on right and left that get the media megaphone.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/08/mccain-calls-paul-cruz-amash-wacko-birds/

From the comments

‘None of this makes any sense until you start ignoring the party affiliations. It’s not Republicans versus Democrats, not really. It’s Statists versus Classical Liberals. If you look at it that way, it becomes quickly apparent why nothing seems to change no matter what party is in power.’

‘From a candidate who practically THREW the 2008 election.
Don’t you like the Constitution either, John? You’ve been in the beltway tooooo long, John. Time to move on. You are completely irrelevant.’

‘I certainly hope we have as many watching this as watched that filibuster. The dems are exposing themselves, defending McCain; trashing the Constitution and the rights of the American people. ‘

‘This type of stuff is a big reason why McCain didn’t get elected. Many republicans see him as a liberal with an R after his name on the ballot. And many liberals don’t listen to him because he has an R after his name onthe ballot. I respect his heart and the motivation he gave to many soldiers while they were POWs. But he is part of the problem in the political system. His attitude of not rocking the boat and making back room deals to get legislation passed is a big reason why this country is in such a bad fix.’

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-08 11:22:35

Interesting but still ultimately puppet-watching IMO. If Romney won, he’d be using the drones as well (on the advice of the military and intelligence communities, same as Obama is). The pushback would’ve come from Bernie Sanders or Ron Wyden, etc. (they went on TV rather than filibustering.) It’s above average puppet theater and it’s great someone actually performed a filibuster, but still ultimately theater.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-08 11:25:53

When was McCain assigned champion of everything war material and military contracts? He cares about nothing else. Or is it personal motive(cha-ching)? I think it’s important to ask that question because he’s the public face of DoD.

Either way, everything he says and does is done to expand the MIC above all else.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-03-08 11:50:03

’still ultimately puppet-watching IMO’

I don’t think so. What it looks like to me is the downfall of the neocons, and maybe even a dent in the so-called “liberal interventionist” thugs. First; Chuck Hagel is now in charge of their primary killing machine.

Consider this:

‘It isn’t just drone strikes on American soil that Sen. Paul is calling into question. He challenged the so-called “signature strikes,” and asked the vital questions that none of his colleagues (save Sen. Wyden) dared raise until now: how do we know who is a “terrorist”? Who is authorized to launch or veto these strikes? What standards are used to determine if a target is a legitimate one? How many civilian deaths have resulted from our drone campaign? Has this helped us or hurt us in the countries we are bombing?’

‘Sen. Paul’s critique has gone beyond even this, extending into the foreign policy realm. He used the drone issue to make a very effective criticism of our interventionist forays in general, pointing out how the notion of a perpetual war has empowered the Imperial Presidency and threatened the very foundations of our republican form of government.’

‘It was a wide-ranging indictment of our foreign policy of global interventionism, a gauntlet thrown down in the path of the neocons who control the foreign policy department of the GOP.’

‘John McCain and Lindsey Graham both understand this, which is why these two “amigos” were on the Senate floor the next morning denouncing Paul in no uncertain terms. Of course they had to respond: and in that response – which had little to do with Paul’s actual arguments – they only underscored their own weakness. The Amigos are losing their grip on the Republican foreign policy shop – and that is the good news we’ve been waiting for.’

‘Being politicians, with their fingers perpetually in the wind, the Republicans who got up off their fat butts and ran down to bask in Paul’s limelight did so out of political necessity rather than commitment to principle. After all, where were Minority Whip John Cornyn, Saxby Chambliss, Pat Toomey, and the rest during the Bush years?’

‘What was significant about the presence of so many Republicans rushing to the Senate floor to get in on the action was that they felt compelled to do so.’

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/03/07/standwithrand/

 
Comment by michael
2013-03-08 11:57:41

paul wasn’t challenging obama, democrats, or republicans. his filibuster was symbolic…a challenge to the status quo.

i am sure obama and mccain’s masters are doing everything they can to squash paul…just like they did to the tea party and OWS movements.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2013-03-08 19:01:50

“Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is continuing to criticize his fellow Republicans for their filibuster of incoming CIA Director John O. Brennan over drone policy.”

It’s time for this old crony to be put down. He needs horse tranquilizer in a bad way.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-03-08 20:41:38

This Fox News interview with McCain shows what I’m talking about regarding a sea change in GOP politics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ1g-FxBios

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-08 21:34:18

I totally agree with you, which is why I wish certain puppets of the sock variety would give it a rest around here for a while.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-08 13:12:39

A vote for Obama was effectively a vote for status quo FOMC policy. Does anyone think O WON’T reappoint Bernanke?

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-08 09:53:11

“The county has 278 bank-owned properties, only 66 of which are on the market. ‘They are recognizing the foundation, at least in this area, is firming up and they can put a few more on without hurting the market,’ he said.”

I find if fascinating that the MSM casually discusses price fixing by banks as though it is legal. Just imagine the affordable housing benefits to consumers if collusion to prop up prices were ended!

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-03-08 10:05:25

On top of that, they report it as an undeniably good thing. As are higher house prices or delayed foreclosures.

 
Comment by Pete
2013-03-08 17:55:23

“I find if fascinating that the MSM casually discusses price fixing by banks as though it is legal.”

Unless banks are legally obligated to quickly sell every foreclosed property they own, there’s nothing illegal here. I’m not up on property law, but this one seems a given.

Comment by NihilistZerO
2013-03-08 18:32:34

Anti-trust law is the issue. They are certainly in violation.

Comment by Pete
2013-03-08 19:01:59

“Anti-trust law is the issue. They are certainly in violation.”

Maybe, according to wikipedia:

The Sherman Act prohibits “[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce.”[4] Conduct falls within the scope of this prohibition only if some form of agreement or concerted action can be proven.”

I agree that there is apparent manipulation going on, but the banks seem to be doing it without any form of communication with each other (lack of “agreement or concerted action”).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-08 21:46:28

I personally don’t find the tacit collusion argument you make plausible without a severe lack of competition among banks. WITH competition, if one bank tries to hold his inventory off the market, his competitor gains advantage by selling REO. Competition among many banks would drive home prices down to affordable levels.

But if only a few banks control a majority share of the industry, local market control to eliminate competition and drive prices up to monopolistic levels which guarantee outsized profits for the REOwner becomes far easier to implement.

Are Banks Becoming Too Big to Jail?
Use Antitrust Policy to Break Up Mammoth Banks
By Dean Baker, Codirector of the Center for Economic and Policy Research
March 8, 2013

This week the nation’s chief law enforcement officer told a Senate committee that he was concerned that prosecutions of large banks could endanger the country’s financial system. As a result, the Justice Department may not prosecute cases against these banks that it would bring against ordinary citizens or smaller banks.

The immediate issue at hand was the decision not to prosecute the bank HSBC because of its involvement in laundering money for Mexican drug gangs. Just to be clear, these drug gangs were not just people that sold drugs to willing buyers, they also engage in kidnapping, murder, torture, and a variety of other criminal activities. Attorney General Eric Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee that big banks may be able to share the profits with such outfits with impunity because prosecuting them could lead to financial instability.

There are two possible stories here. In one case the concern about financial instability is nonsense but is being used to protect powerful financial interests. The second possibility is that the Justice Department really is concerned that its prosecutions of big banks could bring down the financial system.

The first possibility is quite plausible. When Enron was about to collapse in 2002, former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who was at the time a top Citigroup executive, called a former aide at Treasury. He asked him to intervene with the bond rating agencies to get them to delay downgrading Enron’s debt. Citigroup owned several hundred million dollars in Enron debt at the time.

The Treasury official refused. When the matter became public, Robert Rubin claimed that he was concerned about instability in financial markets. It is entirely possible that the reluctance to prosecute big banks represents the same sort of fear of financial instability as motivated Robert Rubin. In other words, it’s a hoax.

But let’s say that we really do have to worry that prosecuting the criminal activities of Bank of America or J.P. Morgan really would sink the economy. How can we justify allowing such dangerous behemoths to exist? The country ostensibly has an antitrust policy to prevent corporations from becoming this powerful.

In principle we would use antitrust law to break up a phone company because it was charging us $10 a month too much on our cable. How could we not use antitrust policy to break up a bank whose size allows it to profit from dealing with murder rings with impunity?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jingle Male
2013-03-08 12:10:55

“…..in [Nairobi’s] Westlands [area], you would need nearly 100 million shillings ($1.15 million) to purchase a quarter an acre of land.”

WTF is that? $4,600,000 per acre? $105/SF of land. In Nairobi?

That exceeds the price of prime commercial real estate land in most of the top 25 U.S. Cities.

Absurd……

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-08 12:15:25

Tell us about the Cow Town (Sacramento) RE market.

Are all the call center employees lining up for suckers’ mortgages?

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2013-03-08 19:05:39

Yes, it’s the biggest global bubble in the history of mankind, and you bought into it. Your shacks are going to CRATEEERRRRR!!! like you never imagined.

 
 
Comment by Pete
2013-03-08 17:26:58

“‘I’ll tell you, there are Realtors blanketing neighborhoods, asking people to sell their homes.’”

That would be a fascinating conversation.

Realtor: “Yeah, now’s the time to sell, everyone’s getting multiple offers above the asking price”

Owner: “I think I’ll wait a few years for the value to go up even more”

Realtor: “Well, this is a Fed-fueled spike, not really sustainable. I’d unload now”.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-08 21:50:58

I’ve received advice from no fewer than four SoCal friends and associates that I’d better hurry up and buy a home NOW before prices go up.

The word that SoCal prices are going up is out there now, and everyone seems quite convinced…

 
 
Comment by rms
2013-03-09 01:06:03

From the third piece: “Shedding light on shadow inventory”

” Phil Harlan, practicing broker at Keller Williams Olympia, said agents throughout the South Sound are aware of the shadow inventory and will continue to watch the situation.

“It’s not something to be terrified of,” Harlan said.

He agrees if the banks dumped their entire inventory, it would depress the market. He believes, however, that the evidence says they won’t be doing so.

“I think the banks are smarter than that,” he said.”

No mention of the federal reserve providing financial support and approving phony asset accounting rules to save these “smart banks.”

 
Comment by rms
2013-03-09 01:16:56

From the piece: “Dubai-style property developments arrive in Kenya”

“Q: What kind of buyers are you targeting?

A: About 90% of the people who have bought the residential spaces are doing so for investment purposes. They don’t want to live there themselves. The majority of the buyers are local investors and the diaspora.

Maybe the Somali pirates are laundering their loot into real estate?

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-16 16:13:39

-18

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post