March 14, 2013

Bits Bucket for March 14, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

350 Comments »

Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 02:53:52

CFTC is ‘examining’ process of gold price determination in London.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is determining if gold prices are being manipulated in London, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

The CFTC hasn’t began a formal investigation, but it is examining whether the setting of prices for gold, as well as for silver — a smaller market — is transparent, the Journal reported. Twice a day, a number of banks meet in London — which is the largest gold market — to set the price for a troy ounce of physical gold.

The CFTC is headed by former Goldman Sachs executive Gary Gensler, who has “called for reforms to Libor and other benchmarks that would require them to be based on actual transactions, rather than estimates submitted by industry firms,” the Journal reported.

“The idea that pervasive manipulation, or attempted manipulation [of interest rates], is so widespread should make us all query the veracity of the other key marks,” CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton at a Feb. 26 roundtable in Washington, D.C.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:44:25

“Twice a day, a number of banks meet in London — which is the largest gold market — to set the price for a troy ounce of physical gold.”

Isn’t price fixing legal outside of America, where we have the Sherman Antitrust Act to prevent it?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-03-14 07:21:07

Twice a day, a number of banks meet in London — which is the largest gold market — to set the price for a troy ounce of physical gold.

Why does the price of gold continually go up and down throughout the day on the little price ticker on CNBC?

 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 03:07:21

Profiting from municipal deadbeats: Wall Street wins in Detroit crisis

The only winners in the financial crisis that brought Detroit to the brink of state takeover are Wall Street bankers who reaped more than $474 million from a city too poor to keep street lights working.

The city started borrowing to plug budget holes in 2005 under former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, who was convicted this week on corruption charges.

“We have no lights, no buses, poor streets and now we’re paying millions of dollars a year on our debt,” said David Sole, a retired municipal worker and advocate for Moratorium Now Coalition, a Detroit group that fights foreclosures and evictions. “The banks said they need to be paid first. But there is no money.”

Banks including UBS AG (UBS), Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) have enabled about $3.7 billion of bond issues to cover deficits, pension shortfalls and debt payments since 2005, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Liabilities rose to almost $15 billion, including money owed retirees, according to a state treasurer’s review.

The debt sales cost Detroit $474 million, including underwriting expenses, bond-insurance premiums and fees for wrong-way bets on swaps, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That almost equals the city’s 2013 budget for police and fire protection.

Wrong-Way Bets

Detroit also entered into swaps contracts with UBS and SBS Financial Products Co., which serves as a counterparty on swaps transactions.

The arrangements are a bet on the direction of interest rates and can raise costs if they move unexpectedly.

Rates fell, leaving a liability of $439 million on June 30, 2012, according to a city report. That has fallen to about $350 million as rates went back up, said Jack Martin, Detroit’s chief financial officer.

The borrowing “likely contributed to our current problems,” said Martin, who took his job in May, 2012. “It was the way people did business back then. We are where we are now and working hard to right the ship.”

The city makes periodic swap payments from money generated by casinos.

Public Interest

Wall Street firms could end the deals and call for full payment because Moody’s Investors Service last March cut unlimited general-obligation bond ratings to B2, five levels below investment grade, according to the city’s 2012 financial statement. In November, Moody’s cut the rating again, sending it down two levels to Caa1.

Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:26:23

“The city started borrowing to plug budget holes in 2005 under former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, who was convicted this week on corruption charges”

TBTF banks suck and should be broken up…but it seems the voters may have some blame in this.

 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:28:38

Labor unions, Democrats, bla bla bla (insert Drudge memes here)…

The PIGS got PAID, and that’s all that matters :)

Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 06:38:36

The public unions also have not missed one dime of payment.

The banks and public unions. The only sure way to bankrupt your city.

When you start borrowing money to cover day-to-day expenses - you are on the down slope. The cliff happens when you can not even afford the interest payments.

Like I have said in the past:

We will have zombie cites that collect 100’s of millions in taxes and yet provide not ONE city service. All the money will be spent in public union and interest obligations.

Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:42:09

are the unions TBTF? i am pretty certain they are TBTJ under this administration.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Redrum
2013-03-14 06:56:57

> All the money will be spent in public union and interest obligations.

What’s unique about municipal obligations is that they have been “pledged” by property taxes. It’s not “people” who are on the hook to pay these, it’s property. When you purchase a property in a city, you are - in essence - signing on to pay your fair share of any existing obligations. Sell the property, and you get to walk away from any promises you’ve made (with your prior votes).

I think that’s part of the problem. Given a more mobile population… what’s the harm in voting in/for ridiculous pension benefits. “I don’t plan to live here for more than 5 years. It will be the next guys problem”.

When shopping for property, home buyers typically have an inspection of the physical property. They’ll check out the quality of the school districts. They’ll assess their commute length, and access to public transportation, etc. I *don’t think* most people do a financial assessment of the city government, checking out the status of the pension funds, etc. Perhaps they should. I know that the next time I go property shopping, it’s probably something that will be on my checklist. I almost think it should be part of the standard property disclosures.

A fully informed market would/should bake this into the property value/price- which would provide a financial incentive for current owners to ensure their local government acts responsibly. I just don’t see it working that way now (in most cases).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2013-03-14 07:22:52

“When shopping for property, home buyers typically have an inspection of the physical property. They’ll check out the quality of the school districts. They’ll assess their commute length, and access to public transportation, etc. I *don’t think* most people do a financial assessment of the city government, checking out the status of the pension funds, etc. Perhaps they should. I know that the next time I go property shopping, it’s probably something that will be on my checklist. I almost think it should be part of the standard property disclosures.”

Transparency is difficult to achieve when things have devolved into the charade we have these days. Don’t look down.

 
Comment by Redrum
2013-03-14 07:39:11

Put another way, you’re really buying a “share” of the city. Just like buying a share (stock) in a company, it ought to come with full annual disclosures-

 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 07:57:44

it ought to come with full annual disclosures-
On the long term, disclosures are not likely to help much. I bought my present house in 1980, and real estate taxes were about $400. This year they will be about $2100. My house did not appreciate proportionally (if indeed it appreciated at all) during that time. The voters kept voting on more taxes.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-03-14 09:39:00

tresho
I assume a lot of property tax increase was education related. Voters seem to think throwing more money at education fixes it. So Ca is addicted to the concept.
“It’s for the children!”

You were smart to buy and stay, and you still got screwed.

 
Comment by Redrum
2013-03-14 10:24:02

I live in one of the lowest spending (per pupil) states in the country. That’s always talked about as a bad thing. However, our students test about average. Better than average in my more immediate area. Seems to me, that means we’re getting very good value for our educational dollars. It’s a good thing!

Education is one of the few other topsy-turvey places (besides housing) where low price is “bad” by the general public.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-03-14 12:20:14

redrum…It has never been about money its always been about demanding people speak English when you walk in the school.

When principals, teachers and parents allow Ebonics to take over, its all over for the school.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 19:30:03

The cliff happens when you can not even afford the interest payments.

That’s the point when quantitative easing comes in handy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-15 08:13:03

How soon will that be? [cough]

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:47:00

The only winners in the financial crisis that brought Detroit to the brink of state takeover are Wall Street bankers who reaped more than $474 million from a city too poor to keep street lights working.

Bloodsucking great vampire squids…

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:59:05

No they’re not. They are the producers, the job creators, the masters of the universe, doing God’s work, the makers not takers, the real Americans, Galt Gulch, Horatio Alger, born in a log cabin, bootstrapping, American exceptionalist, restorers of our future.

Comment by rms
2013-03-14 11:39:18

+1 Great summary!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 16:16:46

Yes, we must kowtow to these great people until the end of time! All hail the job creators!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by PeakHubris
2013-03-14 07:16:50

Megabank Inc. is sucking the life out the USA, and citizens are too stupid to do anything about it.

Comment by rms
2013-03-14 07:25:22

“Megabank Inc. is sucking the life out the USA, and citizens are too stupid to do anything about it.”

The courts are little help, which is why a revolution is baked-in, IMHO.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:47:57

It sounds to me like Holder drank too much of Turbotax Timmy’s too-big-to-fail koolaide.

Investment Banking | DealBook Column March 11, 2013, 9:15 Realities Behind Prosecuting Big Banks
By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

Eric Holder told senators last week that some banks are so large that prosecuting them could be economically destabilizing.

Are banks too big to jail?

If there was any doubt about the answer to that question, Eric H. Holder Jr., the nation’s attorney general, last week blurted out what we’ve all known to be true but few inside the Obama administration have said aloud: Yes, they are.

“I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if we do prosecute — if we do bring a criminal charge — it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy,” Mr. Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large.”

Mr. Holder continued, acknowledging that the size of banks “has an inhibiting influence.” He said that it affects “our ability to bring resolutions that I think would be more appropriate.”

To put this in the proper perspective, Mr. Holder said, for the first time, that he has not pursued prosecutions of big banks out of fear that an indictment could jeopardize the financial system.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-03-14 08:21:00

Mr. Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large.”

Sounds like he agrees with us.

 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 08:39:53

Sounds like he agrees with us.

Then he should quit and be a blogger if he’s not going to do anything about it.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 09:00:03

Making those remarks WAS doing something about it. Now it is up to the American people to follow through with a demand for reforms. There is no sound reason to enable firms in one sector of the economy to reach too-big-to-jail size.

 
 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 07:57:53

And Marie Antoinette didn’t get it either.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 19:38:08

Friday, Mar 1, 2013 07:57 AM PST
Why I let Wall Street walk
Justice Department prosecutor Lanny Breuer gives an unapologetic exit interview to Dealbook
By David Dayen

I’ve never seen as relatively unheralded an official as the head of the criminal division at the Justice Department get so many exit interviews in national newspapers. But Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who’s retiring to spend more time with his family at white-shoe law firms on Wall Street, has been given multiple chances to make a last impression. When you spend nearly four years and fail to prosecute anyone of significance for the financial crisis that caused millions of foreclosures, layoffs and a giant hole in the economy that has still not been papered over, I guess you need your pals in the establishment to help you plead your case.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-03-14 08:18:06

Which stupid citizens would that be? The ones who sat in a nice chair on a sunny Saturday and sang “Proud to be an American?” or the ones who Occupied Wall Street for weeks?

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 08:56:35

Yeah, but Drudge posted a link to a UK Daily Mail piece that had a pic of some dude taking a dump on a NYPD cruiser.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2046586/Occupy-Wall-Street-Shocking-photos-protester-defecating-POLICE-CAR.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-03-14 09:42:01

All anybody has to do is stop borrowing, get another person to stop borrowing, and get that other person to get somebody to do the same.

That’s it. The banks would have no new customers, and most likely collapse within months.

Instead, we’ll stupidly let it get bad enough that the only resolution is bloodshed.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 08:57:52

Damn unions and socialeest commies!

Oh wait…

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 09:34:51

Current banner ad on HBB:

https://www.teapartypatriots.org/

 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 03:16:56

Dallas Fed Proposed Cap Seen Shrinking U.S. Banking Units by Half

A proposal by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas to limit government support for banks could force JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Bank of America Corp. to shrink their U.S. consumer and commercial-lending units by more than half.
The plan would cap assets at deposit-insured divisions of the largest U.S. financial firms at about $250 billion and wall off investment banking from traditional lending, Dallas Fed Executive Vice President Harvey Rosenblum said in an interview. The limit is needed to allow the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to shut a failed bank without using taxpayer funds, he said.
“The regulators are going to use their powers and new tools to make life so tough for the big banks that they’ll end up shedding assets, businesses and breaking up de facto on their own.” said Brian Gardner, a Washington policy analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.
JPMorgan’s U.S. consumer and commercial-lending units had assets of $646 billion at the end of December, according to a regulatory filing by the New York-based bank. Similar divisions at Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America had $686 billion of assets. That means each would have to shrink by about 60 percent to drop below the Dallas Fed’s proposed cap. JPMorgan is the largest U.S. bank by assets, and Bank of America is No. 2, when all their businesses are included. JPMorgan is 51 percent bigger than it was in 2007, Bank of America’s assets have increased 29 percent, and Wells Fargo is more than twice as large, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. All three acquired other banks during the financial crisis. Citigroup, which didn’t, is 15 percent smaller.
Industry lobbying groups, including the Financial Services Forum, which represents the chief executive officers of 19 of the largest financial firms, have spoken out against the plan, saying the U.S. needs the Vampire Squid to enlarge to an infinite size big banks.
Forum CEO Rob Nichols wrote in a Jan. 28 Dallas Morning News op-ed: “Large institutions provide unique and significant value that smaller banks simply cannot provide such as a rapid and catastrophic collapse of the banking system.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:48:11

Why are the most important lines crossed out?

 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 03:32:52

US tax cheats nailed after snail mail SNAFU:

Swiss financial adviser Beda Singenberger’s case shows you also have to be pretty careful when you mail things the old-fashioned way. Over an 11-year period, federal prosecutors charge, Singenberger helped 60 people in the U.S. hide $184 million in secret offshore accounts bearing colorful names like Real Cool Investments Ltd. and Wanderlust Foundation.
Wegelin & Co. of Switzerland pleaded guilty in Manhattan federal court in January 2013 to conspiring to help hide more than $1.2 billion in assets from the IRS, while opening undeclared accounts for at least 70 U.S. taxpayers who were former UBS clients. Then, according to a prosecutor, Singenberger inadvertently mailed a list of his U.S. clients, including their names and incriminating details, which somehow wound up in the hands of federal authorities. Now, U.S. authorities appear to be picking off the clients on that list one by one. “He was sending mail to someone in the United States, and apparently in error he included a list of U.S. taxpayers,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Dan Levy said on March 5 at the sentencing in New York of Jacques Wajsfelner, an 83-year-old exile from Nazi Germany. “The government has mined that list to great effect and prosecuted a number of people who were on that list.” Wajsfelner only learned at his March 5 sentencing that he came to the government’s attention through the misdirected list, according to his lawyer, Jeffrey Denner. “That was definitely news to me and my client,” he said. “Beda Singenberger, to my understanding, is a figure who’s certainly put a lot of people in the frying pan. I don’t think a lot of people recognized they were so close to the fire.”

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:01:12

So that makes them part of the 47%, right? Or are they 40% of the 47%?

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-03-14 04:02:58

“If you buy a house today at the current massively inflated prices, you’re going to lose a lot of money…… ALOT of money.

Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:28:54

i want the t-shirt and bumper sticker.

 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:31:43

You won’t just loose alot of money, you’ll loose years of life expectancy, your hair, your spouse, your kids, your mind. The sum of those losses will be incalculable.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 07:47:01

Your spin is probably the only way the average ‘merkan will ever come around to realizing that buying a house has real risk. Losing money, I actually think people can stomach that*, even if it is “alot of money” [sic].

Losing my wife or health? Now those are persuasive. Those are the road to ruin. Yes, maybe you can put your life back together afterwards, but also maybe not.

* they’ll still be in denial that they could lose money, but I think some people would still rather own a house even if it costs quite a bit more than renting

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 09:18:03

The losses in suburban Maryland and in San Francisco will be incalculable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 12:12:00

“some people” want to pay double the cost for shelter?

There’s another doozy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 07:58:02

You’ll also get ED … don’t say you weren’t warned.

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 08:01:44

You’ll also get ED

Watching the “Suzanne Researched It” is as stimulating as dunking your junk in a bucket of ice water.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Coastal Cal
2013-03-14 04:13:02

California Foreclosure Starts Skyrocket 41.3 Percent in February

http://www.centralvalleybusinesstimes.com/stories/001/?ID=23020

A full 4 million houses are either in default, delinquency, underwater or empty in CA. And with rental rates half the monthly cost of buying a house, housing demand at 17 year lows and falling, housing inventory in the millions and growing, why buy a house with these kind of massive personal risks looming?

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-03-14 06:40:34

California Foreclosure Starts Skyrocket 41.3 Percent in February

This is surprising (though obviously a good thing). Does anyone have any inkling of why we might be seeing this now?

Isn’t this the opposite of what we’ve assumed the banks want?

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-03-14 06:43:32

Brown rot is the reason.

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 07:13:20

That’s Racist®

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-14 08:58:04

CA has been steadily working through their distress–they’ve gone from a 15.3% non-current loan rate in early 2010 down to 7.4% as of February 2013. The “Homeowner Bill of Rights” was thought to slow this down, but I think what it is really doing is stopping banks from processing a foreclosure while they are also trying for a short sale. So if you just pegged dealing with distress by measuring foreclosure activity, you would think things slowed down more than they actually have.

However, don’t get too excited that banks are accelerating their foreclosure activity…you’ve got to put the increase in February into context though (per Foreclosure Radar):

NOD’s filed:

December 2012: 11,431
January 2013: 4,861
February 2013: 6,866

So, yes, there was an increase from January to February, but we are still WAY below December levels, and even farther below February 2012 levels (19,004).

Why are we seeing it now? It’s just the dead cat bounce after banks adjusted in January for the new law. Banks certainly aren’t using the law as cover to stop foreclosing altogether.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:49:40

“California Foreclosure Starts Skyrocket 41.3 Percent in February”

I’m sure this is an anomaly, as California has a Homeowners Bill of Rights to protect all Ownership Society members from foreclosure proceedings.

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-14 08:59:41

“California has a Homeowners Bill of Rights to protect all Ownership Society members from foreclosure proceedings.”

How does the law do this? I keep reading people say this, but I have yet to read any provision of the bill that actually does this.

 
Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy
2013-03-14 08:59:56

Thank goodness the Californian’s will be protected and saved- they represent what modern America is all about: blithering ignorance, crushing entitlement, over-consumption, oppressive taxes, reality TV show personalities, overbearing and clueless government apologists micromanaging people’s lives and enabling feral human behavior through cultural rationalization. Without California, New York and New Jersey there would be no America as we know it. Oh and Massachusetts too. We really need the Kennedys and their 6th-grade mentality ‘Camelot-dynasty’ bullshit too.

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 09:23:05

enabling feral human behavior through cultural rationalization

That’s not a very COEXIST thing to say, now is it?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy
2013-03-14 11:11:20

No its not, but then again everyone now has to also embrace MY diversity and accept MY resultant antisocial behaviors. After all, they are part of MY proud culture and ethnicity. We’re ALL winners now!

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 12:03:09

Don’t get too excited. California’s foreclosure rate is 450% higher than trend.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 04:22:13

Home Repossessions Drop 29% to Lowest in U.S. Since 2007

Home repossessions in the U.S. plunged 29 percent last month from a year earlier to the lowest level since 2007 amid increased efforts by state lawmakers and courts to delay property seizures, according to RealtyTrac.
Banks took 45,038 properties from delinquent borrowers in February, an 11 percent decrease from the previous month and the fewest since September 2007, the Irvine, California-based data provider said today in a report. Forty-one states had drops in completed foreclosures from February 2012, led by declines of 78 percent in Oregon and 69 percent in Massachusetts.
“The U.S. foreclosure inferno has been effectively contained and should be reduced to a slow burn in the next two years,” Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac, said in the report. “But dangerous foreclosure flare-ups are still popping up…”

 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 04:39:15

Akron sues man who sold condemned house to veteran

The city of Akron filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the former owner of a house that a veteran purchased last year, only to see it demolished in February.

In the filing, the city says the former owner, John Hufnagel, should pay the $8,400 in asbestos abatement and demolition costs.

Veteran Larry Modic bought the home from Hufnagel last year for $10,000. Modic said he was unaware there were pending housing violations associated with the residence when he made the purchase.

Hufnagel has said the house should not have been torn down. In an effort led by state Rep. Zack Milkovich, D-Akron, another home has been purchased for Modic in Akron through donations. Closing on that transaction is expected soon.

On Monday, the Akron City Council passed legislation requiring sellers to provide written notification of housing and zoning violations to a buyer.

The city on Monday released a residential disclosure form Hufhagel signed in early 2012 that indicated he was not aware of any violation of building or housing codes.

It would seem to be easier for the city’s housing & zoning authorities to simply publicize the alleged violations and bypass the owner’s role in notifying anyone. But that’s just me.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:05:59

That would required them actually providing a useful service, which is just crazy socialeest, big government commie talk.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-03-14 04:50:06

Handy-dandy guide to Pimp-RAL stock posts:

“You’re a lying realtor” —> +1
“Why don’t you tell us your losses” —> +1
“Your losses will be incalculable” —> looks like a decent pencil-out.
“Craaaaater!” —> Good morning. :-)
“If you buy a house today you’re going to lose money, a LOT of money.” —> Good morning.
“Surely you can’t be that deluded” —> insightful post!
“If you paid more than $50 sq/ft, you paid an inflated price.” —> I agree on the difference between job areas and non-job areas.
“Let’s see you balance your checkbook” —> +1
“Rent is half the carrying cost of buying, always” —> looks like a decent pencil-out.
“Housing is always a depreciating asset. Always.” —> but I see the value of a paid-off house.
“Why buy today when you can buy for 65% off” —> +1
“^^^^^^LOL^^^^^” —> This.

[and now I'm po'd at myself for not figuring it out sooner.]

Comment by Montana
2013-03-14 06:18:48

No, it’s “ALOT”of money.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:24:09

I explained the “a lot” thing to him so we could get our HBB Spreadsheet updated but he claimed “alot” is for emphasis.

*shrug*

 
 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:33:42

Amy Hoak, is that you?

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 06:43:15

Poor Miss Craterton…… her losses have blinded her.

Comment by oxide
2013-03-14 08:20:53

Thank you for the +1, sweetie. :grin:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 06:41:21

It’s a lonely job being the HBB poster girl for housing mania and debt donkeyness.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 06:51:39

It’s a lonely job being the HBB poster girl for housing mania

She did not buy in a “mania” and there was nothing manic about her buying decision.

and debt donkeyness

She pays less than her prior rent with a fixed interest rate that’s the lowest in our lifetimes. I’ll bet she can have that house fully paid for in about 17 more years.

The value of facing facts is incalculable.

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 06:58:11

There is nothing factual in the post by our Brazilian Bubble poster child.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 07:13:36

There is nothing factual in the post by our Brazilian Bubble poster child.

Says our poster child of denial.

I am a bubble poster child. My house was paid for in cash, has very low carrying costs and has tripled in value in less than 6 years. Tripled. Dang.

But it’s not my doing. I didn’t expect any bubble. I (as did oxide) bought because I wanted to own and it penciled out.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 07:39:29

No one expects the Brazillian Housing Bubble.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 09:00:56

And you couldn’t find a buyer for that sea side shanty in the slums for a fraction of what you’ve got it.

But do keep telling yourself how much your dump is worth.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 09:22:54

you couldn’t find a buyer for that sea side shanty in the slums for a fraction of what you’ve got it

Buyers are trying to find me. Every couple weeks my intercom bell rings with someone asking if I want to sell. “Sea-side shanties” are the cat’s meow right now.

keep telling yourself how much your dump is worth

Like how much the smaller house 50 meters away from me sold for in January? Their gain is calculable if they have a calculator. I’ll bet their 30-40% of the sale price bag of unreported cash that usually goes along with a Brazilian home sale is calculable.

I am just talking current reality here. But the amount of jive you are spewing and the entertainment you are providing is incalculable.

 
Comment by polly
2013-03-14 09:25:30

“for a fraction of what you’ve got it.”

Could you translate this to what you actually meant to type? Ususally I can figure it out, but this is too vague.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 09:31:47

Of course you’re convinced your sea side shanty in the slum is worth something. Everything you’ve got is tied up in it.

Carry on debt junkie.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 09:41:43

sea side shanty in the slum is worth something. Everything you’ve got is tied up in it.

This is not true. Even 5 years ago what I had “tied up in it” represented a less than 1/3 fraction of what I had.

(And that fraction was not incalculable then and is not incalculable now even though that fraction has risen ALOT.)

Don’t hate me because my fractions are calculable. :)

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 10:00:15

““for a fraction of what you’ve got it.”

Could you translate this to what you actually meant to type? Ususally I can figure it out, but this is too vague.”

——————–

That’s a typo I made in the HBB RAL spreadsheet I put together when I was interning for RAL. He means “what you’ve got in it” meaning cumulative payments, renovations, etc.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 10:15:22

….because your entire world is wrapped up in a depreciating seaside shanty in the slums.

 
Comment by PeakHubris
2013-03-14 18:08:38

“My house was paid for in cash, has very low carrying costs and has tripled in value in less than 6 years. Tripled. Dang.”

Yeah, that’s normal. Nothing to see here. Move along.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 18:47:12

“bag of unreported cash ”

This is a poser that we can trust.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 08:05:11

She pays less than her prior rent with a fixed interest rate that’s the lowest in our lifetimes.

Rents are also higher than buying in my little burg.The monthly payment here on a 3 bedroom ranch, including property tax is less than the rent on a decent (non ghetto) 2 bedroom apartment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 12:45:45

The monthly mortgage on the Arizona Slim Ranch is less than the rent on a lot of places in this nabe. Not to mention the fact that I have a nicer yard (grin) and garden (big grin).

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-03-14 14:18:54

“Rents are also higher than buying in my little burg.The monthly payment here on a 3 bedroom ranch, including property tax is less than the rent on a decent (non ghetto) 2 bedroom apartment.”

Doubtful but I’ll give you a chance to prove it.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-03-14 14:32:54

The monthly mortgage on the Arizona Slim Ranch is less than the rent on a lot of places in this nabe. Not to mention the fact that I have a nicer yard (grin) and garden (big grin).

Renting is not always cheaper or better. Often, but not always.

What is amazing to me is that PW is NOT A RENTER, yet posts here dozens of times per day insisting that everyone should rent.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 15:55:02

ALWAYS.

And what is amazing to me is that sfhomowner is a debt slave, yet posts here daily insisting everyone else should be a debt slave too.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 18:50:21

My payments are less than rent. I live under a bridge.

 
Comment by CRATER!!!!
2013-03-14 18:58:11

Mine too. I live in a CRATERRRRRRRRRRRRR!

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:51:03

Isn’t it awesome how a one-poster wrecking crew can trash utterly trash the NAR’s propaganda message?

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 09:35:28

Yep.

And the resident ruses expose themselves for the paid hacks they are.

Got reputation.com?

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-03-14 07:31:56

I’m looking for a place to build my $50/ft2 vinyl-sided shack in lower Manhattan. I’m going to put in a three-car garage by the koi pond in the backyard, because I know parking is a problem there. Anybody know of any good lots available?

Are there alot of lots?

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 07:44:23

Battery Park might be a good fit.

The Koi Pond is unfathomable.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-03-14 07:48:03

The Koi Pond is unfathomable.

That helps them overwinter.

You can park your boat on it if you’re ever in town.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 07:50:33

$50/ft2 vinyl-sided shack in lower Manhattan.

It’s ALWAYS cheaper to rent than to buy for $50/ft2 in Manhattan.

ALWAYS.

Your losses will cause hair growth on the palms of your hands.

(or at least one of them)

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 07:54:35

Yeah, the availability of lots thing is funny. There are no lots in my part of B’more that are appropriately sized for SFR. You could buy someone’s existing SFR and build new I guess?

The new houses are all attached product (townhouse style) or condoze. There are lots of new rental properties, though. Hundreds. In very good locations like Brewer’s Hill/Canton.

But if you want SFR for your own personal reasons you have to go to the suburbs. Which, Hell no, not happening. (BiLA if you’re out there today, you should see what the suburb of White Marsh has turned into. Townhomes and McMansions on postage stamp lots for miles in all directions, many new road projects, and traffic on I-95 backed up for miles at rush hour.)

Comment by localandlord
2013-03-14 18:00:04

Joe, could you combine two townhouses that depreciated to zero and build a SFH where they once stood? I realize they may well be in a ‘hood that you don’t want to live in but is it possible from a zoning standpoint?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 08:01:24

Are there alot of lots?
Lots of them, past the low water mark. It would be to your advantage to start out underwater.

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 09:29:46

Isn’t it great how liars cherry pick? Lying cherry picking debtors.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 09:55:53

Isn’t it great how liars cherry pick?

You’ve been busted again Pimp Watch.

If your rant “it’s ALWAYS cheaper to rent than to buy” were true….then would it not be impossible to “cherry-pick” examples that disprove it?

You can find the word “always” in any reputable dictionary. Heck…..it’s even in my pocket-sized English/Portuguese dictionary.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 11:04:04

Speaking of cherry picking liars.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 04:55:12

“The bank has tried to work with me, but on only a social security income, it was tough,” said Thomas, who got into trouble after refinancing during the real estate boom and then losing his job during the recession.”

Posted: 6:00 a.m. Thursday, March 14, 2013

Florida’s foreclosure rate more than three times the national average

With one in every 282 homes receiving a foreclosure notice last month, Florida’s foreclosure rate was more than three times the national average, according to a report from the market research firm RealtyTrac.

“The courts are bearing down and forcing cases to trial whether they are ready or not,” Golant said. “There are many files that could and should be closed, but they are pushing cases across the board.”

Despite the processing push, suburban Lake Worth resident Aubrey Thomas was able to get his 2009 foreclosure delayed. The 70-year-old, whose house was scheduled to be sold at auction on Monday, recently found a full-time job in housekeeping with the Department of Veterans Affairs. He now is hoping to get a loan modification that will allow him to keep his home.

“The bank has tried to work with me, but on only a social security income, it was tough,” said Thomas, who got into trouble after refinancing during the real estate boom and then losing his job during the recession.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/business/sixth-month-in-foreclosure-first-place/nWrDK/

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:09:22

I guess he should have known he would be laid off without any warning.

What a lazy deadbeat!

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 11:55:27

“said Thomas, who got into trouble after refinancing during the real estate boom”

“The 70-year-old, whose house was scheduled to be sold at auction on Monday,”

Perhaps 64 or 65 is not the appropriate age to start a cash out refinancing career.

 
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-03-14 05:04:05

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/a/SB10001424052970204422404576596630897409182?mg=reno64-wsj

Good discussion of why employers “can’t find anyone qualified to hire”.

The other day, the richest guy on hbb finally admitted it when pressed: he wants 100k coolies. Must be willing to travel half your time, be on call 24/7, and spend a lot of time and money to get a laundry list of certs.

Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:33:44

who’s the richest guy on facebook?

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:39:24

I said on HBB.

And it’s not important who it is but rather what he said and then what he said when others pointed out his unrealistic laundry list of qualifications for a job in that pay range.

I think he’s a good poster, so it wasn’t a personal thing, he’s just insane to think someone who could do the things he wants should work for him for less than they could get elsewhere.

Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:53:03

lol…sorry…meant HBB.

i think we all know who the richest person on FB is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:58:19

ok…forget about who he is…how do you know he’s the richest.

did i miss an HBB contest or something?

not saying i would have won but would like to know where i shake out with the rest of yall.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 08:05:29

I don’t “know” for sure. Based on how he writes and the types of things he’s discussed I find him credible. Especially because he’s made declarations against his own interest (e.g. that he’s not going to make money off his house, he’s going to loose [sic] alot [sic]). Declarations against interest are an exception to the general Hearsay Rule so as a Lying Lawyer I find those types of things pretty compelling.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-03-14 20:19:02

I would wager that a few of the MD’s posting here as well as some of our retired investors make considerably more than the mid-six figures suggested by your example. ;-)

And never underestimate the number of semi-nomadic singles who welcome the traveling tech/sales rep lifestyle. (Worked for me; works for Bila.) It’s a great place to start one’s career and an excellent way to make useful contacts for later on. Nothing like doing business abroad on the company dime….

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-14 08:41:00

I think he’s a good poster, so it wasn’t a personal thing, he’s just insane to think someone who could do the things he wants should work for him for less than they could get elsewhere.

Obviously he occasionally finds them. There are all sorts of people out there who are motivated by a wide variety of things. But it seems to require a significant amount of searching according to him.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 09:11:18

Turnover has costs. I can’t speak to his business, but our clients would notice if every 6 months or year their work was being written by different people. And they’d notice if it was good people leaving as opposed to bad. I’m assuming if you underpay, good people are not going to stay long, but mediocre people might be inclined to hang around (unable to get better comp)

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-03-14 09:27:55

Joe you can always underpay someone who lives walking distance or 5 minutes from the office with a free parking space.

 
Comment by polly
2013-03-14 09:31:06

Good people will especially not stay in places very long if, in addition to being underpaid, they are in position where their hard earned technical skills are going to atrophy. He specifically said he needed people with great technical skills/certs for credibility, but that they would lose those skills because they wouldn’t be using them.

That plus the horrible travel schedule and I you have set an ideal way to chase employees out the door.

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 11:29:54

Joe you can always underpay someone who lives walking distance or 5 minutes from the office with a free parking space.
——

Funny you mention this. For Overtaxed’s position, it’s a combination of work from home and travel. Sort of takes one’s exact location out of the equation. This makes the position even more challenging. Not everyone has a home office where they can truly get work done on a consistent basis and very few people really want to spend all day, everyday at home. Then you mix in the travel to random places for at least 1/3 of the time… bad recipe, IMO.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-03-14 12:29:54

true working from home has its limits…at least I have a nice view and can see the new WTC from my picture window…over the noisy LIE and a cemetery…

The LL installed Anderson double pane windows with the uv screen, last summer, what a big difference in sound deadening as well as insulating against the midday sun and winter cold….

I always hated commuting, and usually moved close to the job. So to commute an hour each way vs 5 minutes it would have to be a substantial pay raise like 50%…..or work for some famous company or celebrity which we make me super employable after the gig is over.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 06:43:44

What is a coolie?

The richest person is not the one who has the highest income, it is the one who wants little, needs less and owes nothing.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:52:15

Wow — I may be a lot richer than I knew…

Comment by rms
2013-03-14 07:35:44

“Wow — I may be a lot richer than I knew…”

+1 Indeed; you should wear that invisible suit today.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 19:45:59

Oh right…the Emperor’s New Clothes suit…

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-14 08:44:36

When I heard his description of the sacrifices required to make a 6 figure income in tech I decided I must be a lot richer than I knew, too. I have the mythical tech job that’s only about 8 hours a day and requires little travel.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by (Now that I'm "diversified") Jetfixr
2013-03-14 10:02:44

Blue Skye Description of Coolie =

Mindless propaganda/”wisdom” passed down by the overlords thru multiple generations, to brainwash the coolies from grabbing the pitchforks.

Add this to the “Meek shall inherit the Earth” file.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 13:37:12

I am familiar with the term from the Chinese workers on the western railroads. Thought maybe it had some now connotation regarding iphones or something.

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2013-03-14 07:23:51

was that a question during the contest?

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 07:38:34

Richest is admittedly a poor term and I should have said “highest income”. I’d rather cultivate my interests than consume so I have a hard time relating to our culture’s idea of “rich”. However, there is a trade off when it comes to income; there are a lot of people working really hard to make piddling amounts so if you’re going to work hard you might as well make a lot. Then you can always cut back on work at some later point. For example, I find it hard to imagine I’ll want to work on a full time, daily basis past my mid-50s and the idea of really working (much less relying on the income) in my 60s seems absurd. There will be two younger generations of lawyers by then and an entire world to see, tennis to play, music and books to enjoy. Hence, work hard and stack money now. Overtaxed is still youngish so he has time to cut back as well.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 07:56:08

Then you can always cut back on work at some later point.

Not always. We’ve all friends who didn’t make it past 30. Cut back in your mid 50’s?

Now there’s a best-laid plan but sometimes plans go astray.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 08:15:25

It seems like if you can make it to mid-50s with no major health problems, you are far ahead of the game. Where it gets tricky is insurance. I assume that a lot of people work jobs they don’t even like in their 50s and 60s for the health insurance.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 08:18:55

Not always. We’ve all friends who didn’t make it past 30.
Death is a sure-fire way of cutting back on work.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 12:48:28

Where it gets tricky is insurance. I assume that a lot of people work jobs they don’t even like in their 50s and 60s for the health insurance.

A dear friend did just that. Not only did he work for the health insurance, he worked for the health insurance until he died of cancer.

Don’t know what his wife did about her own insurance after he was gone. But I do know that she had a fatal stroke about eight months later.

 
 
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 07:57:00

A coolie is someone who works their a$$ off for peanuts. A chump would be a blunt slang term that is similar, but coolie has a historical origin that drives the point home. Kind of like it’s a lack of spine or a moral failing in that the person lacks the ability to go earn a fair wage. To be sure, it was different for the original coolies, who were essentially slave labor/indentured servants.

Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 08:20:18

Then there are chimps, who do as little as possible, no matter how many peanuts you give them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 08:15:52

finally admitted it when pressed: he wants 100k coolies. Must be willing to travel half your time, be on call 24/7, and spend a lot of time and money to get a laundry list of certs.
Nothing ‘unrealistic’ about that at all. Maybe a little hard to find someone with those qualifications, who is also willing to trade that much of their lives for so little compensation, but that does seem to be the current reality. I’m not saying it makes sense, is humane, is worth anyone’s while, etc. At least we got some clarity on job demands vs. job rewards. That was very helpful.

Comment by (Now that I'm "diversified") Jetfixr
2013-03-14 10:22:44

You guys live in another world, when making $100K is considered being a “coolie”.

A miniscule number of people working in my field make $100K, even the “best and the brightest”. Add to this is the fact that the miniscule few who make that salary get it mostly from “being in the right place, at the right time” that from being “best and brightest”, and finding an employer that doesn’t implode in five years.

Which is where my frustration lies. There are levels of skill in my business, and I’m probably in the top 10% (As a DOM, I get to do a lot of other things besides turn wrenches…..foreman/supervisor, concierge, part-time lawyer, contract/RFQ developer and negotiator, salesman, PowerPoint presentation specialist) etc.

None of this matters. I’ve come to the conclusion that most suits don’t WANT TO KNOW what really goes on, because they have it in their minds that a “mechanic” gets $”X”, and that’s it.

Who has the most influence on what I get paid? Chief Pilots. Because the smartest of them know that I might mean the difference between getting fired or not, if/when something bad happens with the bosses airplane.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 12:49:29

Who has the most influence on what I get paid? Chief Pilots. Because the smartest of them know that I might mean the difference between getting fired or not, if/when something bad happens with the bosses airplane.

There you go. The people who actually fly planes know how good you are.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 23:11:44

Who has the most influence on what I get paid? Chief Pilots. Because the smartest of them know that I might mean the difference between getting fired or not, if/when something bad happens with the bosses airplane.
At least some people who benefit from your efforts and skill have some say in what you get paid. Lots of other businesses don’t make that connection.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Overtaxed
2013-03-14 14:32:47

That conversation the other day made me realize I need to ask for a raise. :)

I’m glad to see some people offering conflicting perspectives on this, from both sides. It’s interesting how some people (GS-fixer) sounds like our positions would be a good job for them when many others sounds like you’d rather clean up the bathroom after a 24 hour chili eating contest. I guess that’s what makes the world go round.

A few quick points of clarification. Everyone here locked on to the “100K” number. While that’s the “ballpark” it’s not the outfield. We have guys (mostly those with all the certs) making in the 150s pretty regularly. Salary in the 120-130 range and bonus. That does not include health benefits or 401K match, it’s just their salary. Not sure that it matters, sounds like many people here wouldn’t take the job for 1M/yr, but it’s an important distinction. Lowest pay, after bonus, still will get you a bit over 100 (110-120 or so).

“Nothing ‘unrealistic’ about that at all. ”

Of course it’s not unrealistic, we’ve got entire teams of people like this. As does IBM. As does HP.. And so on. IBM has a lot of folks with all those certs AND a PhD (but, admittedly, does pay better, pretty easy to make 200K as a consultant there, would be very difficult where I am now). While you may feel the pay is unrealistic, we certainly find and retain people all the time. I’ve been with the company for 7 years. We have lots of 5 year + guys. And, remember, this industry is only about 7-8 years old, so, that’s quite a long time (the cloud industry, not IT, of course).

“When I heard his description of the sacrifices required to make a 6 figure income in tech I decided I must be a lot richer than I knew, too. I have the mythical tech job that’s only about 8 hours a day and requires little travel.”

You forgot some of my other qualifications. :) Sure, there are tech jobs that have a 6 figure salary and no/little travel. I think they are probably rarer than the types of jobs we have. And tech jobs that don’t require lots of OT are also pretty rare. So, while I’m not sure about “lottery odds”, I think what I do, and the jobs we have, are more common that what you’re doing.

“Funny you mention this. For Overtaxed’s position, it’s a combination of work from home and travel. Sort of takes one’s exact location out of the equation. This makes the position even more challenging. Not everyone has a home office where they can truly get work done on a consistent basis and very few people really want to spend all day, everyday at home. Then you mix in the travel to random places for at least 1/3 of the time… bad recipe, IMO.”

It’s funny you say that; I was thinking today, if I had to go the office every day and then travel the rest of the time, I’d quit, no doubt about it. No way I could ever stand that. The thing that makes my position tolerable today is that I get to spend a lot of time with my loved ones when I’m not traveling. I can kind of pick and choose the hours I want to work (going to be a lot of them, but at least I have some flex there). If I had to go to the office 8-5 and then fly 4-5 times a month, that would be it.

I never really understood a travel heavy/work in the office job. What do you do when you land on the red-eye from CA at 8AM? Go straight in? Are you kidding me? I’d make sure to schedule every single flight from 8-5. :)

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-14 14:51:54

So, while I’m not sure about “lottery odds”, I think what I do, and the jobs we have, are more common that what you’re doing.

That may be true, but you’ve certainly made me glad to be doing what I’m doing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:11:37

From the article:
“But I believe that the real culprits are the employers themselves.”

Whaaaaaatttt!!???! In the WSJ? Did hell just freeze over?!

 
 
Comment by joesmith
2013-03-14 05:11:44

We’re never going back to an environment where mom and pop investors can get low risk interest that outpaces inflation. If interest rates do rise, the risk won’t be worth it. unfortunately suckers will see this as a time to follow cramer and buybuybuy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/bill-frezza/too-big-to-fail-banks_b_2862625.html

” Future historians will puzzle in amazement about how otherwise sophisticated people allowed the entire global monetary system to come crashing down because some Princeton professor got his hands on a printing press. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s unshakable commitment to a Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) has impoverished savers, driven investors dangerously out along the risk curve, and baked a ticking time bomb into the federal budget cake. The last feat is quite an accomplishment considering we haven’t even had a federal budget for almost four years. But when and if Congress finally does its constitutional duty, the Fed cannot even contemplate a return of real interest rates to historical norms because interest payments on the federal debt compounded at 4 or 5 percent will be fatal.”

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:32:33

I should point out that the near-0% rates of now aren’t great, but return OF principal seems like a sure thing.

In the future, maybe investors will be able to get a higher rate, but the return OF principal concerns will outweigh any possible return ON principal benefits.

Comment by salinasron
2013-03-14 08:49:11

“I should point out that the near-0% rates of now aren’t great, but return OF principal seems like a sure thing.”

You mean return of principal without factoring in loss of buying power due to inflation.

Comment by (Now that I'm "diversified") Jetfixr
2013-03-14 10:26:45

At this point in time, at least that is calculable. Call it 4-5% year.

OTOH, a 50% loss in any other “conservative” investment is well withing the range of possibility.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 10:58:58

Hence my emphasis of return *of* principal, not return on principal.

If interest on US debt starts to get rolled over at 4 or 5% we won’t be able to keep up very long, the rates will rise further based on the risks, etc.

The only way to manage this is to keep ZIRP in effect. That’s why when people ask Bernanke how he will “unwind” ZIRP, he doesn’t have an answer or can’t say what the answer is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 06:54:16

An amazing amount of spin.

A democrat controlled senate has not produced a budget in four years (but the Republican controlled house has).

And that seven out of the eight members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (to include Bernanke) were appointed/reappointed by obama/democrats.

Nope - it is just one AMAZING puzzle how this happened and how we got here…

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 07:16:23

- it is just one AMAZING puzzle how this happened and how we got here…

This is obvious from your posts.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:15:41

*snerk*

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 11:02:04

I laughed.

Whenever I try to snark on 2Banana my posts seem to get lost in a filter or else nixed as attacks. 2Bonobo has to be some other poster running a schtick. Whoever it is, ‘fess up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 12:46:28

Ya think? But damn, that is some serious neurosis to like to be insulted, daily.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:53:37

The Fed pursued similar easy money policies under Greenspan, who started it all under Ronald Reagan’s (aka The Accidental Keynesian) oversight. Ben Bernanke is pretty much just continuing the easy money punch bowl spiking regime which Greenspan started.

SO as usual, I am missing the point of your partisan rant.

Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 13:01:42

Yep - Got it - I read them memo.

When Republicans are in power (in the White House): They are truly evil. All the bad, evil and rot in the world can be traced to the administration. They must be voted out of office immediately. Everything is their fault. They are solely responsible. In fact, they caused so much damage that we can blame them for the last five years for all the issues that never got fixed or were made even worse.

When Democrats are in power (in the White House): Well, gosh, this all started 30 years ago anyways. You really can’t blame them. There is not much difference between the parties anyways so we might as well keep what we got. There would have been no difference no matter who won the election. Big corporations and the banks control everything so what difference does it make who sits in the Oval Office anyways.

It is great logic in your own echo chamber. And you can call people wacko partisan for disagreeing with you as a bonus.

Marie Antoinette didn’t get it either. :-)

The Fed pursued similar easy money policies under Greenspan, who started it all under Ronald Reagan’s (aka The Accidental Keynesian) oversight. Ben Bernanke is pretty much just continuing the easy money punch bowl spiking regime which Greenspan started.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 19:50:58

“It is great logic in your own echo chamber.”

Talking to yourself and commenting on your own posts becomes you.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:50:47

“Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s unshakable commitment to a Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) has impoverished savers, driven investors dangerously out along the risk curve, and baked a ticking time bomb into the federal budget cake.”

The beauty of the scheme is that he will be long gone from his post when the bomb explodes.

 
 
Comment by polly
2013-03-14 05:30:30

Happy Pi Day, everyone. Be sure to be nice to the circles in your life!

Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 05:40:09

I will be watching the movie Pi, eat some Pie and listen to Psy.

Oppa gangnam style!

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 05:43:32

Pi R Square. No, Pi R Round, Cornbread R Square.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-03-14 05:44:17

Mmmmmm… I love pie.

Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 05:53:22

“Mmmmmm… I love pie.”

You better not let Mayor Bloomberg hear that, he`ll ban pie.

Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:10:46

he can’t ban pie…he can only limit how much of it you can eat.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:16:05

Does anyone really “love” ginormous regular coke or sprite? (the kind with HFCS?)

I’ve always assumed people buy these drinks because they’re cheap, readily available, and most soft drinks contain caffeine.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 06:21:43

I picked up a bad habit eating in college cafeteria. Swallowing bad food with sugary drinks. I carried that habit until in my mid 20’s and I used to buy 2 liter regular colas. I have been coke free over a decade now.

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:26:26

I did this but with diet coke. The sweetened stuff was never worth the sugar rush. And i’m pretty sure coke/pepsi have only used HFCS during my lifetime. I don’t ever remember regular coke tasting very good or even very sweet. It always had a metallic edge to it.

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 06:27:26

“I have been coke free over a decade now.”

Me too, but I still ocasionally drink soda.

 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 06:39:11

If memory serves regular Pepsi tested sweeter than regular Coke. I am sure they were HFCS…never paid any attention to it back then.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 06:39:20

Does anyone really “love” ginormous regular coke or sprite? (the kind with HFCS?)

I drink about a Coke a week now but in the USA hardly ever. They use sugar in Brazil. A funny thing about Brazil is when you ask them for ice, they only give you a couple small cubes that fill about 20% of the glass.

 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 06:40:35

tasted

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-03-14 06:49:19

The sweetened stuff was never worth the sugar rush.

And here I thought the sugar rush was the whole _point_ of drinking them!

(full disclosure: mostly quit many years ago, and now only have one very rarely).

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-03-14 12:00:56

Coroner Links Mom’s Death to Coke ‘Addiction’

A New Zealand coroner has linked the death of a 31-year-old woman to her Coca-Cola addiction.

Natasha Harris died Feb. 25, 2010 from a cardiac arrhythmia, according to a 19-page coroner’s report obtained by ABCNews.com. And while Harris, a mother of eight from Invercargill, New Zealand, was known to smoke heavily and skip multiple meals, coroner David Crerar concluded that the sugar and caffeine she got by drinking more than 2.6 gallons of Coca-Cola Classic per day was “a substantial factor” in her death.

“When all of the available evidence is considered, were it not for the consumption of very large quantities of Coke by Natasha Harris, it is unlikely that she would have died when she died and how she died,” Crerar wrote in his report.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:26:01

Or he might truncate it to six digits: 3.14159265358979323846264….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by mmrtnt
2013-03-14 12:04:55

And I heart Pi!

 
 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-03-14 06:10:23

When you die, if you get a choice between going to regular heaven or pie heaven, choose pie heaven. It might be a trick, but if it’s not, ummmm, boy!
– Deep Thoughts, by Jack Handey

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 05:36:54

Welcome to the obama housing bubble v2.0

“well-aged, bad loans”???

The 47% have spoken.

—————————

Home Repossessions Drop 29% to Lowest in U.S. Since 2007
By Dan Levy - Bloomberg – 14 March 2013

Home repossessions in the U.S. plunged 29 percent last month from a year earlier to the lowest level since 2007 amid increased efforts by state lawmakers and courts to delay property seizures, according to RealtyTrac.

Banks took 45,038 properties from delinquent borrowers in February, an 11 percent decrease from the previous month and the fewest since September 2007, the Irvine, California-based data provider said today in a report. Forty-one states had drops in completed foreclosures from February 2012, led by declines of 78 percent in Oregon and 69 percent in Massachusetts.

“The U.S. foreclosure inferno has been effectively contained and should be reduced to a slow burn in the next two years,” Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac, said in the report. “But dangerous foreclosure flare-ups are still popping up in states where foreclosures have been delayed by a lengthy court process or by new legislation making it more difficult to foreclose outside of the court system.”

Refinancing programs for borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth are helping cut foreclosures as companies add workers and mortgage rates remain low. Residential values rose 6.8 percent in December from a year earlier, the biggest gain since 2006, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home-price index. The average rate on a 30-year fixed loan was 3.52 percent as of March 7, close to the lowest level on record, according to Freddie Mac.

About 1.1 million property owners last year received new terms through the government’s Home Affordable Refinance Program, double the number in 2011 and more than the Washington- based Federal Housing Finance Agency estimated, according to a March 13 report. Borrowers in the hardest-hit states sought relief, with 68 percent of Nevada refinances and 58 percent in Florida going through HARP, the FHFA said.

In California, a new law that prohibits lenders from pursuing foreclosure while a borrower seeks modified loan terms, last month pushed the state down to 13th for foreclosure filings per household, the first time since 2006 California wasn’t in the top 10, RealtyTrac said.

The delaying effects of legislation in California and other states was evident in the prevalence of repossessions of homes with “well-aged, bad loans” originated from 2005 to 2007, which represent 65 percent of all mortgages in the foreclosure process nationwide, Blomquist said in an interview.

Among metropolitan areas, Baltimore filings rose 145 percent, the biggest gain, followed by Seattle, which climbed 129 percent, and New York, with a 44 percent increase, according to RealtyTrac.

“When we dig down into local markets, there’s still a foreclosure problem that needs to be dealt with,” Blomquist said.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 08:00:15

Among metropolitan areas, Baltimore filings rose 145 percent, the biggest gain, followed by Seattle, which climbed 129 percent, and New York, with a 44 percent increase, according to RealtyTrac.

————–
A good sign in that housing prices should start coming down in places where people have jobs. People shouldn’t have to move to the hinterlands and decide between affordable housing vs. a good job.

Comment by oxide
2013-03-14 08:52:22

But raising prices on ‘needs’ to what the market will bear is capitalism at its best! Why do you hate America?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 12:54:28

Nobody ‘needs’ to buy an overpriced house. Renting is always an option.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2013-03-14 16:39:07

Always? What if you don’t have an income or savings?

 
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 17:49:53

Always. And you won’t be buying a house with no income or savings.

*THINK*

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:17:18

Is this the 47% who are too poor to pay taxes or the 47% who hide billions in Swiss bank accounts and phony non-profits so they don’t have to pay taxes?

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-03-14 05:55:10

Re: the apparent take-off of construction: the losses will be incalculable…

(…but apparently they will all be borne by the taxpayers.)

:-(

Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 06:03:59

“the losses will be incalculable…”

Speaking of incalculable…

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ - 216k -

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:18:36

Did you know that food stamps and Earned Income Tax Credits account for over 50% of the annual deficit? It’s true, it was in the Washington Times.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:21:26

NY Times:liberal bedwetters::Wash Times:White trash

WT=WT

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:45:13

The Washington Times readership demographic: slack-jawed, mouth-breather, Drudge-link clickers whose summary knowledge and opinion of New York can be summarized in John Rocker’s commentary about riding the 7 train.

 
 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 06:39:26

“It’s true, it was in the Washington Times.”

There are some stories that are tough to find in the New York Tmes.

Hi honey, I`m home.

What do you mean you had a car accident?

Whaaaap!

No need in calling the police, that was just a “Garden Variety Slap Across the Face”.

Biden: ‘This Isn’t Your Garden Variety Slap Across the Face’

BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff
March 13, 2013 11:50 am

Vice President Joe Biden differentiated between the “garden variety slap across the face” and other violent acts which indicate domestic violence in a talk Wednesday morning.

This entry was posted in Video and tagged Joe Biden. Bookmark the permalink.

http://freebeacon.com/biden-this-isnt-your-garden-variety-slap-across-the-face/ - 26k -

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:47:08

tough to find in the New York Times

You mean like any reporting on black-on-white crime? LULZ

 
Comment by michael
2013-03-14 06:48:44

what do you tell a woman with two black eyes?

nothing…you’ve already told her twice.

(apparently biden thinks it’s ok to tell her just once…telling her twice is really crossing the line though)

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 06:55:02

Expanding on this month with Joe Biden. (one heartbeat from the presidency)

Hi honey, I`m home.

What do you mean you had a car accident?

Whaaaap!

No need in calling the police, that was just a “Garden Variety Slap Across the Face”.

Hold that thought, there is someone pounding on the front door and screaming. I am going to go shoot the shotgun through it and then open it up and see who is there.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 06:58:31

Joe Biden differentiated between the “garden variety slap across the face” and other violent acts which indicate domestic violence

I’m sure most men would rather take a garden variety slap across the face than a bullet.

 
Comment by michael
2013-03-14 07:09:52

come on Rio…if romney had made that statement your panties would be so “bindered” up you wouldn’t be able to breathe.

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 07:21:31

“I’m sure most men would rather take a garden variety slap across the face than a bullet.”

What does that have to do with the price of eggs?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 07:22:16

if romney had made that statement your panties would be so “bindered” up you wouldn’t be able to breathe.

Actually no. I can differentiate issues from unrelated politics.

There is a big difference between a garden variety slap across the face and a bullet no matter who you voted for.

Is this not obvious?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 07:23:57

What does that have to do with the price of eggs?

Are you kidding? Maybe this?

“Joe Biden differentiated between the “garden variety slap across the face” and other violent acts which indicate domestic violence”

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 07:59:35

“I’m sure most men would rather take a garden variety slap across the face than a bullet.”

He is talking about men abusing women. But if you want to state the obvious I am also sure most women and men would rather take a garden variety slap across the face than be run over by a drunk driver, or be blown up by an armed drone.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 08:08:45

He is talking about men abusing women.

Why? Because that’s the left’s “bleeding heart” take on domestic violence? Only men hit women? I’m not buying it. There are stats showing 40% of domestic violence is women against men. It might be more because what man is going to report a slap?

If a lady did something really bad and I lost my temper and called here a B!$ch, and then she slapped me, I’m not going to hit her back but I’m not going to call the cops on her either.

Now if she pointed a gun at me, I just might call the cops. (If I’m still alive.)

 
Comment by michael
2013-03-14 08:21:10

spin…spin…spin.

 
Comment by michael
2013-03-14 08:23:03

maybe i get it now…he’s only talking about legitimate assault?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 05:59:35

Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%:

“The only winners in the financial crisis that brought Detroit to the brink of state takeover are Wall Street bankers who reaped more than $474 million from a city too poor to keep street lights working.”

Blame labor unions, white flight, or whatever, but the PIGMEN got theirs.

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-14/only-wall-street-wins-in-detroit-crisis-reaping-474-million-fee.html

 
Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 06:09:02

is it safe to back up the truck on Facebook shares today?

 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:11:59

Renting is always better. Always.

“Americans have resumed moving from the Northeast and Midwest to the West and South — shaking off the effects of the recession and housing bust, which had made it more difficult to relocate.

The fact that more Americans are now moving west and south could reflect improved hiring and suggests fewer people are stuck in one place because they owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. Separate Census figures recently showed around 4% of the U.S. population moved to a different county in 2011, the highest level since before the recession.”

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/a/SB10001424127887324392804578358543880986774?mg=reno64-wsj

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:19:02

They’re mostly not moving for jobs, they’re moving because they’re retiring (because they’re 65 or because they’ve given up on finding meaningful new work).

America is aging. More people are leaving the workforce, that’s the only way that the official UE numbers have fallen significantly since 08/09.

God I hate articles that assume people only move for jobs. Yes, everyone is moving to FL, AZ, NV for all the amazing jobs. Ha-ha. :-P

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 06:50:38

Joe, the workforce is swelling with older folks. Their employment rate has gone up while employment of younger folks has gone down.

The official UE numbers have fallen significantly because many have run out of benefits, so they aren’t counted, and because the statistics are from the Ministry of Truth.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 07:42:29

This is also a terrible thing, except if you buy the AARP’s spin (”yay, is’nt it great that older people now can’t afford to retire and enjoy their interests? they get to work until they literally can’t work any more!”).

It’s not a sign of a healthy country when a lot of olds are working and the young are idle. Of course, the olds don’t care about America’s long term future and why should they? America being ripped off and having a grim future really doesn’t matter to anyone. The bankers will continue winning, as they always have.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 08:03:04

By what measure do you conclude that we do not care about the future of our children? Is it that we would rather be Wallyworld greeters than settle for lazy golf days?

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 08:09:19

As a generation, the Boomers havent’ cared about anyone but themselves and won’t stop until the carcass that was the U.S. is bereft of meat.

If we made a list of Boomers’ “contributions” to America it would be pretty interesting.

We’re talking about the generation, not individual Boomers. There are approx 70 million Boomers I think?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 08:15:56

Then can we assume that your generation is as a whole responsible for the current state and direction of affairs? And that your age group does not care?

 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 08:34:19

The boomers care about their own children and grand children. It’s the other people’s children and grand children, they don’t give a F. The boomers are just like any other generation.

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 09:21:56

How are millenials responsible? The oldest of us spoiled sh*theads are 30, the youngest are still in their teens. Don’t we get a few more years? We’re far too busy to vote while listening to 2chainz while smokin’ the kush.

Also, yes we probably will stink up the joint. This has almost nothing to do with me since I am unamerican by many people’s standards. Anti military, anti patriot act, don’t really believe in God, don’t believe we’re really a free market capitalist country, etc. I’m pretty sure you’re not a typical “Boomer” either.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:22:44

Grumpy and uncaring? Yeah, because seniors love to work in their old age, so it can’t be THAT.

 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 09:47:14

since I am unamerican by many people’s standards

You voted for Obama. You are as american as olive garden.

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 10:04:24

I voted for Obama because he doesn’t appoint hacks to the federal bench and because Mittens’ views on social and cultural issues sicken me. The way Mittens’ people rigged the GOP convention and didn’t allow Ron Paul to speak certainly helped as well.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 12:53:20

“The way Mittens’ people rigged the GOP convention…”

How’d that work out for them?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 17:49:51

Did the Democrats allow anyone to oppose their party pick??? I can’t remember even a whisper of that. We are down to Party Boss politics. A grassroots movement is easy now with the internet and all. Maybe it is just too early, with most of the USA debt donkeys just hoping for a little cheese rather than freedom.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 23:14:38

Did the Democrats allow anyone to oppose their party pick??? I can’t remember even a whisper of that.

In your life it only seriously happened once in any party. 1980. Get real.

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 08:18:11

The fact that more Americans are now moving west and south could reflect improved hiring

Here in low tax Colorado, home of a few of those “best place to live” cities, we get a ton of transients coming through, looking for work. They fill up the computer lab at the local library, where they use the PCs to search for jobs on Craigslist. Few find anything and move on.

“Yes, everyone is moving to FL, AZ, NV for all the amazing jobs. Ha-ha.”

In today’s offshored reality, an “amazing job” is a FT job that pays $10/hr.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 08:20:04

Anecdote, a few years ago (during the go-go housing bubble) a new Embassy Suites opened in our little burg. 2000 people showed up to apply for mostly menial, $10/hr jobs at the hotel.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 09:20:38

You lie. Everyone knows that Americans are entitled and lazy and drive Escalades to use food stamps at the grocery store!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 09:32:13

All of that is true. I read articles about it here:

http://www.breitbart.com/

 
Comment by Pete
2013-03-14 10:43:17

Wow, gotta love the headline, “Kelsey Grammer Lost Hundreds of Thousands Investing in Windmills”

 
Comment by rms
2013-03-14 21:11:14

Wow, gotta love the headline, “Kelsey Grammer Lost Hundreds of Thousands Investing in Windmills”

There is a company, Katana-Summit, that makes the huge tall towers for these windmill farms that are being developed along the Columbia River hydro-electirc complex since the electrical grid is not far away. Anyway, this company spent millions constructing a fabrication facility in Ephrata, WA, only to shutter it within a couple of years.

Apparently the State Department has given favor to Vietnam because they have a long antagonistic history against China. A deal was cut so that it is cheaper to build these huge towers in Vietnam and ship them here than it is to build them forty miles away. The Ephrata fabrication facility has been FOR SALE for several years now, and several hundred steel fabricator jobs were lost.

 
 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 09:25:10

How many of them were recently arrived from La Jolla or Noe Valley, CA?

I hear there is this “exodus” from CA going on, I assume it’s all the resourceful people from CA moving away from the socialist enclaves that were enslaving them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by (Now that I'm "diversified") Jetfixr
2013-03-14 10:40:36

I have a brother an sister (and other relatives) that live in DFW, some since the 40s or earlier.

The fabled “Texas Job Market” doesn’t exist for anyone except the high skilled techno nerds, and whoever sells them stuff.

My brother doesn’t have a degree, but has done many different kind of technical jobs over the years (which kept going away, as there jobs were moved to China and Mexico).

Now he’s in his mid-50s, and lives with my sister, because a guy like him can’t find a job in DFW that pays over $12-15/hr. And the only reason he makes that much is because he’s an English speaker who can do math.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 11:09:17

Another thing about Texas and Florida… they have a very interesting demographic future to look forward to.

Texas GOP is already running to the left on immigration and nominating as many brown people as they can. Ted Cruz, Jason Villalba, George P Bush, etc. They want to keep the state competitive because if they don’t start to get at least some Hispanic votes, Texas will be a blue state in 10 years or so.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 12:53:03

AZ’s Congressional delegation is now 5-4 Democratic. Phoenix and Tucson both have Democratic mayors. And, in this year’s Tucson City Council election, let’s just say that the three Dem candidates will most likely cruise to re-election.

So, watch this state turn blue too. It’s already happening.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 12:30:07

The fabled “Texas Job Market” doesn’t exist for anyone except the high skilled techno nerds, and whoever sells them stuff.

Pretty much the same story here in the Centennial State.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by rms
2013-03-14 22:05:49

“The fabled “Texas Job Market” doesn’t exist for anyone except the high skilled techno nerds, and whoever sells them stuff.”

Look at your bills that you and your neighbors [have] to pay each and every month, mortgage or rent, utilities, fuel card, smart phone etc., that’s where you look for employment during a downturn. You won’t get rich, but you’ll have steady work, IMHO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 06:18:00

Funny how obama and the democrats NEVER campaigned on ANY of this…

Oh well, never let a crisis go to waste.

————————–

Here’s where we are on Obama’s gun control proposals:
Gun Owners of America | Mar. 14, 2013 | GOA Staff

Here’s where we are on Obama’s gun control proposals: •Today, the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary voted to report the Feinstein gun ban –which could ban between 50% and 80% of guns and magazines in circulation today.

•Tuesday, the Judiciary Committee passed, by a 10-to-8 vote, the universal gun registry bill. Chief sponsor Chuck Schumer has been unable to achieve Republican support from anyone other than the anti-gun Illinois Republican Mark Kirk.

•This brings us to the central battlefield: Last week, the committee reported, by a vote of 11-to-7, the Veterans Gun Ban, S. 54. The lone GOP vote in favor came from Chuck Grassley, who indicated he would oppose the bill on the Senate floor unless it was improved from the committee-reported version.

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:50:15

What’s really pathetic are the regime apologists who try the justify the DHS’ purchase of billions and billions of rounds of ammunition. Nothing to see here folks, just more Hope and Change from the Nobel Peace Prize president.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 06:55:32

A local guy shot the window out of a parked vehicle in front of his house yesterday. 60 police cars came to the scene, a swat team, something that looked like an urban tank, hostage negotiators and even a bomb diffusing robot. It took them all day to decide what to do. What a circus.

Victor NY

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 07:12:02

What a circus

Dog Day Afternoon was a really cool movie.

 
 
 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 06:21:57

This Revealing Chart Shows You Exactly What the Calif. Exodus Looks Like

Mar. 13, 2013 12:12pm Becket Adams

“According to a 2012 University of Southern California study on state demographics, you have to go back to the early 1990s to find a time when more Americans were moving to California than leaving it for other states,” he writes. “Thanks to high housing prices and a weak job market, California is now a net exporter of U.S. citizens to other states.”

And in case you’d like help visualizing some of this, we have you covered. The below chart from the U.S. Census Bureau perfectly illustrates Carroll’s point:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/13/this-stunning-chart-shows-you-exactly-what-the-calif-exodus-looks-like-not-ready/ - -

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:30:44

When you consider that CA has almost 40 million people, those “exodus” totals are pathetic. You’re talking tenths of a percent. Over a 5 year period (which was in the late 90s…. they don’t have better data than that)?

Blah.

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:43:37

CA has almost 40 mil people. Those “exodus” numbers work out to tenths of a percent (or less!). Over 5 year periods. Pretty weak. “Oh noes, we lost .1% of our population to FL” (note: almost all geezers and WTs). This just isn’t that convincing. CA has problems for sure, but this “illustration” would only be persuasive for a rather dim person.

Also, why are they cherry-picking those years? The “exodus” figures are from ‘95-’00. Wasn’t Pete Wilson the governor then? And they couldn’t find anything more recent/better to illustrate their point?

Also, as pointed out above, I’m sure all those people leaving for FL and AZ really moved because the job market is so much better there! Lolsies for dayz.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 08:24:48

In the early 90’s we considered moving from SoCal to Phoenix. So I subscribed to the Arizona republic to get the want ads. Boy, where the pathetic. I mailed out a few resumes and did get some feedback. Those who contacted me were expecting me to take a huge pay cut of they hired me. After two months I decided that it was a waste of time and gave up.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 09:32:19

I kind of like PHX as a snowbird place (January through Mach). We stayed a resort for a week last year for a conference for my wife. Pointe Hilton Squaw Peak resort; I’m not sure if it was within Phoenix proper. The surrounding areas were like ghost towns. We’d walk a couple miles at night, we could walk in the middle of streets if we wanted, it was that dead.

There was a lot of new-ish and interesting looking housing that appeared to be sitting empty. Prices were a small fraction of what we are used to. Strip malls were half-empty with “for lease” signs everywhere. Prices at good restaurants were also super cheap, once you left the resort. I guess that’s because much of the food is grown nearby or in Mexico + the rent for the restaurants is likely cheap.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-03-14 08:58:06

Did anyone else catch this?

“net exporter of U.S. citizens to other states.”

 
 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:25:23

The losses in metro DC will be incalculable:

“The rapid-fire growth in the Washington region slowed appreciably last year as other cities hit hard by the recession started to recover and attract more newcomers, new Census Bureau figures show.

Demographers said the 2012 population estimates confirm that it is the twilight hour of a remarkable phase in the Washington region.

Now, in the aftermath of the recession, more options are opening up elsewhere. Among the 15 largest metropolitan areas, Washington is in the bottom third for job growth

http://m.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-metro-area-population-growth-slows/2013/03/13/145ffc66-8c09-11e2-9f54-f3fdd70acad2_story.html

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 06:35:58

Growth should no be the aim of a city/region. Quality should win out over quantity. Way too late for that in DC. And probably most of America. For some reason, people associate “capitalism” with “growth” but they understand different types of growth. We’ve been conditioned to focus on what is measurable; in the absence of measurables, some economist will make something up.

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 06:54:38

Been smoking those Kunstler buds again, commie?

Remember what they told us after 9/11:

http://www.sfvirtualshop.com/Web%20poster%20icon.jpg

 
 
Comment by CRATER!!!!
2013-03-14 06:36:35

The mid-atlantic and northeast is just entering its’ price decline phase.

Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 06:52:51

are the cabbies and shoe shine boys talking about home and stock prices yet?

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 06:55:22

Copper Falls on Concern China Housing Curbs Will Sap Demand
By Joe Richter - Mar 13, 2013 11:39 AM PT

Copper fell the most in a week amid concern that policy makers will expand efforts to cool the housing market in China, the world’s biggest consumer.

Chinese stocks fell, dragging the benchmark index to a two- month low, as real estate and construction companies tumbled. Sina.com reported the southern city of Shenzhen banned developers from raising home prices. Accelerating inflation means the country should be on “high alert,” Zhou Xiaochuan, head of the People’s Bank of China, said today, signaling a heightened focus on controlling prices.

“Any sign that demand in China may slip is going to hit copper,” Michael Smith, the president of T&K Futures & Options in Port St. Lucie, Florida, said in a telephone interview. “Copper is a building and expansion material, and when that slows, copper feels it.”

On the Comex in New York, copper futures for delivery in May slid 0.8 percent to settle at $3.525 a pound at 1:07 p.m., the biggest decline since March 1.

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao last month called for local authorities to “decisively” curb real estate speculation and take steps to rein the property market after data showed prices surged.

Stockpiles of copper monitored by the London Metal Exchange, up 63 percent this year, increased 0.5 percent today to 520,500 metric tons, the highest since March 2010. Inventories have risen for 20 straight days, the longest streak since January 2010.

On the LME, copper for delivery in three months declined 0.5 percent to $7,787.50 a ton ($3.53 a pound).

Nickel, aluminum and zinc also fell in London. Tin and lead were higher.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:03:45

Vancouver’s real estate market mirrors Chinese economy, according to study
By Kevin Griffin, Vancouver Sun March 12, 2013

All aspects of the Vancouver housing market and economic growth in China move together and are statistically significant, according to an analysis by an economist with the Conference Board of Canada.
Photograph by: Richard Buchan , THE CANADIAN PRESS

Vancouver’s housing market fortunes closely mirror trends in the Chinese economy, according to an analysis by an economist with the Conference Board of Canada.

Robin Wiebe says his number crunching has found that there are strong links between home sales, price growth and housing starts in Vancouver and the overall health of the economy in China.

Wiebe made the same comparison with the Toronto housing market and found that Chinese gross domestic product figures were linked to growth in that city’s housing sales, but not to price or starts. GDP is the market value of all goods and services produced in a country.

All aspects of the Vancouver housing market and economic growth in China move together and are statistically significant, Wiebe said.

“It’s another piece in a puzzle,” he said by phone from Ottawa on Monday. “It’s evidence that the Chinese economy moves with various Vancouver real estate variables. It’s another piece of evidence that supports the link between Vancouver and China.”

In the Hot Topics in Economics blog on the Conference Board of Canada website, Wiebe wrote that the effect of China’s economic growth on the Vancouver real estate market rivals the effects of three domestic factors: Vancouver’s population growth, changes in employment, and mortgage interest rates.

“The chief implication is that observers need to pay attention to China’s economic health when assessing the outlook for Vancouver’s housing market,” said Wiebe, a senior economist at the Conference Board’s centre for municipal studies.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:07:23

This Wikipedia article suggests the Chinese property bubble has already popped. How do they come up with their “facts”? The bubble hasn’t even begun to deflate.

Chinese property bubble (2005–2011)
An empty corridor in the mostly vacant New South China Mall.

The 2005–2011 Chinese property bubble was a real estate bubble in residential and/or commercial real estate in the People’s Republic of China. The bubble started to deflate in late 2011 when housing prices began to fall,[1][2] following policies responding to complaints that members of the middle-class were unable to afford homes in large cities.[2] The deflation of the property bubble is seen as one of the primary causes for China’s declining economic growth in 2012.[2]

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:15:35

Given that he used to work at the Fed, I guess it stands to reason that this guy’s housing bubble beer goggles are fogged up.

Real Estate
China Real Estate Won’t Bring It Down: Roach
Published: Tuesday, 5 Mar 2013 | 2:40 AM ET
By: Katie Holliday
Writer for CNBC.com

Fears of a bubble building in China’s property markets were debunked by Stephen Roach, senior fellow at Yale University, as investors become increasingly concerned over the country’s rising property prices.

According to the former non-executive chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, China’s residential property market represents only around 5 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), thus if things go bad it will not devastate the economy.

“Of that 5 percent [GDP], only 2 to 3 percent is at risk…Does that sound like an economy that will be strangled by a housing bubble?” he told CNBC. “This is not going to bring China down, and unlike the U.S., which allows bubbles to develop, the Chinese are very aggressive in trying to control that kind of thing.”

Speculation over the re-emergence of a bubble in China’s property market heightened this week after the government introduced policy measures seemingly designed to cool the market. The measures included an increase in down payments and loan rates for buyers of second homes in cities where prices are shooting higher.

The Shanghai Composite slumped 3.7 percent by Monday’s close, following the announcement late on Friday. Meanwhile a gauge of property developers listed in Shanghai dived by 9.3 percent by Monday’s close, its largest daily loss since June 2008.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:21:10

Which command-and-control economy nation has more vacant shadow inventory: The U.S.A. or China?

March 3, 2013 7:05 PM
China’s real estate bubble

China’s economy has become the second largest in the world, but its rapid growth may have created the largest housing bubble in history.

The following script is from “China’s Real Estate Bubble” which aired on March 3, 2013. Lesley Stahl is the correspondent. Shachar Bar-On, producer.

If trouble comes in threes, then what’ll be the next global market to melt down after the U.S. and Europe? Some are looking nervously at China.

China has been nothing short of a financial miracle. In just 30 years, this state-controlled economy became the world’s second largest, deftly managed by government policies and decrees.

One sector the authorities concentrated on was real estate and construction. But that may have created the largest housing bubble in human history. If you go to China, it’s easy to see why there’s all the talk of a bubble. We discovered that the most populated nation on earth is building houses, districts and cities with no one in them.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 10:55:28

I don’t understand why gloomsters assume this bubble cannot continue to expand for decades to come?

Marc Faber says investors should fear China’s ‘colossal credit bubble’
March 14, 2013, 4:12 AM

High-profile market bear Marc Faber says investors should be worrying about China’s “colossal credit bubble,” telling CNBC late Wednesday that how China chooses to deal with the situation will be crucial to determining whether the world’s second-largest economy can continue to grow.

“Whether they can ensure continuous growth will depend on reforms and how to deflate the colossal credit bubble we have in China,” said Faber, editor and publisher of The Gloom, Boom and Doom Report. “This is going to be a huge problem because we have so much underground credit, questionable loans outstanding and questionable investments.”

Faber said China’s economic growth is probably much slower than official numbers suggest.

China won’t miss its growth target of 7.5%, he told CNBC:

They will announce it, but the reality will be much lower. If you look at the statistics that are more relaible like Korean, Japanese or Taiwanese exports … then export figures from China don’t add up entirely.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:00:08

Republicans in Congress are doing all they can to keep bankster scam artistry alive and legal.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:01:48

Warren Says Consumer Bureau Foes Protect Profits for Bad Actors
By Cheyenne Hopkins - Mar 14, 2013 6:00 AM PT

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau before seeking office, said Republicans preventing a vote on Richard Cordray as the agency’s director are “keeping the game rigged.”

“Blocking Rich Cordray is about weakening the agency,” Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in comments prepared for a Consumer Federation of America conference in Washington. “Blocking Rich Cordray is about keeping the game rigged, keeping the game rigged so that consumers remain in the dark- and a few bad actors can rake in big profits.”

Comment by Neuromance
2013-03-14 10:26:36

There is big money in financial obfuscation.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 10:46:10

To badly paraphrase Gandhi:

“It is difficult but not impossible to live very well as an honest business, but impossible to become rich.”

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 12:54:13

Give this lady a Pecora Commission!

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:33:31

According to the 60 Minutes segment on the Chinese real estate bubble, “people in the middle class have bought five, even ten apartments,” many of which are situated in ghost cities with no residents.

Isn’t it pretty much guaranteed that these people are all going to get rich off this investing strategy, as Chinese real estate always goes up?

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:37:01

I thought the investing craze was bad in the U.S., and the Fed has definitely made it a lot worse by adding the fuel of $40 bn a month in QE3 MBS purchases to the raging bonfire, but after seeing that 60 Minutes story, I am pretty sure the situation in China is a lot worse — i.e. anyone who buys a home there now is going to lose a lot more than 65% on their investment.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:43:28

Why can’t the Fed’s balance sheet just keep expanding to greater and greater record size forever from here, just as the stock market can to to higher and higher record levels?

I fail to grasp this talk of the “need to get out of” the Fed’s balance sheet expansion. Why can’t the Fed balance sheet bubble continue to inflate forever? There is no physical limit on the electronic printing press technology.

Tapering Fed’s bond buys could help housing: Fed’s Fisher

Richard Fisher, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, speaks during a conference before the Committee for the Republic Salon at the National Press Club in Washington January 16, 2013. REUTERS/Jose Luis Magana

By Ann Saphir

Thu Mar 7, 2013 6:24pm EST

(Reuters) - Slowing the Federal Reserve’s current pace of monthly asset purchases could paradoxically help the U.S. housing market, a top Fed official said on Thursday.

“The housing market is getting to be quite strong. It’s quite possible, in my view - and this is my personal opinion - that a little tapering there would actually make people realize that we’ve bottomed out on the interest rate cycle,” Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher told Fox Business Network in a TV interview. “I think you’d actually see more activity than you are currently seeing.”

Fisher in the past has said that the Fed’s super-easy monetary policy may actually deter borrowing because consumers can continue to count on low borrowing costs far into the future. By cutting back on bond purchases, the reasoning goes, the Fed could touch off a rush of economy-boosting borrowing as consumers try to lock in low mortgage rates.

The Fed has been buying $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities and $45 billion in Treasuries each month to push down longer-term borrowing costs and encourage businesses to boost hiring.

That’s on top of vowing to keep short-term interest rates at rock bottom until the unemployment rate falls to at least 6.5 percent, as long as inflation stays under control. Unemployment is currently at 7.9 percent.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and several other influential members of the Fed’s policy-setting committee have argued that the benefits of the bond-buying program clearly outweigh possible costs.

But Fisher, who does not vote on the Fed’s policy-settting panel this year, has been among the minority who has emphasized the risks of continuing to add to the Fed’s balance sheet, now at a record $3.091 trillion.

“The issue to me is, how do we get out of this huge expansion of our balance sheet, and what will be the risks that we run in doing so as interest rates come up and the economy improves,” he said Thursday.

 
 
 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 07:34:06

A shout out to Spook for the AIDS documentary in youtube yesterday.

I watched half of it last night. Nicely done.

There will be similar documentaries on “climate change” in near future.

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 09:55:30

Can you expand on this idea. I’m not sure what parallel you’re drawing between HIV/AIDS and climate change? (I didn’t watch the documentary, I was busy cooking meth and downloading pr0n)

 
 
Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 07:43:02

As I suspected.

Hoyer’s Remorse: We Should Have Cliff-Dived

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:56:00

Beware the ides of March.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 07:58:05

The Stock Market Is a Debt-Fueled Bubble: Steve Keen
By Lauren Lyster | Daily Ticker – Wed, Mar 13, 2013 8:19 AM EDT

Stocks fell into the red ahead of the closing bell Tuesday and while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) went on to end its seven-day streak of gains, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) still managed to eke out its sixth straight day of posting an all-time record high.

To point out the very obvious, it’s not likely to continue forever. But according to economist and author of the book Debunking Economics, Steve Keen, it stands to get much, much worse in the next one to two years.

Keen tells The Daily Ticker the U.S. stock market is a giant bubble. But the key factor inflating it may not be what you think, according to the economist (i.e. he’s not pointing fingers at the Fed…at least not directly).

Keen has his eye on margin debt. This is the money people borrow from their stockbrokers to expand their holdings of shares. Keen says the ratio is now 70%, meaning with $300,000 you can borrow $1 million worth of shares.

Here’s where it gets interesting. Steve has found a relationship between the change in margin debt and the level of asset prices. Even more importantly, he points to a correlation between the acceleration in margin debt and the rise in asset prices.

If his theory holds true, this means we’re relying on the acceleration of margin debt to drive rising share prices. And when that acceleration slows down, equity prices will fall.

“Nothing can accelerate forever,” Keen tells The Daily Ticker. “At some point the acceleration stops, and when it does the market breaks.”

Keen says margin debt levels in the U.S. now are similar to where they were in 2000 and 2007.

“So I think you haven’t got a lot of head room there,” he notes.

Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 08:37:34

buy high sell low is the american way. they like saving money for wall street criminals.

 
Comment by Patrick
2013-03-14 10:07:39

Cantankerous

I so totally agree with this article. I just wish that it expanded a little more, ie that the 70% is held on the light side not the heavy. Heavies are about 100%; thankfully are few in number but hold a high percentage of the margined debt.

1929 anyone? Where are the regulators?

These wonderful profits being made by industry (with fewer workers than before) would disapear if interest rates went to where they should be.

I think we are in the calm before the storm and Bernake has allowed us to drift too far from shore to be able to find any kind of shelter.

 
Comment by rms
2013-03-14 23:04:56

“Here’s where it gets interesting. Steve has found a relationship between the change in margin debt and the level of asset prices. Even more importantly, he points to a correlation between the acceleration in margin debt and the rise in asset prices.”

Same thing happened to San Luis Obispo, CA real estate. Prices shot up to roughly 15x the household income while area incomes remained stagnant. The catalyst was taxpayer-backed debt.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:00:26

Stocks Have Hit New Highs Every Day For a Week–Time for a Crash?
By Henry Blodget | Daily Ticker – Tue, Mar 12, 2013 10:25 AM EDT

Since the market low in 2009, every move upward has been greeted with confident assertions that another crash was just around the corner.

After all, the world is still beset by problems, from the Eurozone, to China, to the gridlock and debt problems here in the U.S.

At some point, market gurus have assured us, this sucker’s rally will end, and stocks will plunge.

Well, a crash is always possible, but as time goes by, a return to the 2009 lows seems less and less likely.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) is up more than 110% from its 2009 lows. Despite some modest pullbacks along the way, this push higher has been steady and strong.

This year, the Dow is already up 10%, and it has set new all-time records in each of the past five days.

So, what’s next?

Will the bull run continue?

Or will we finally get the crash that some investors have been waiting to use as an entry point for the past four years?

As ever, it’s impossible to say.

Yahoo! Finance Senior Columnist Michael Santoli says those waiting for a crash may be waiting for Godot. The more likely event is a pullback at some point. If we do get that pullback, it won’t be obvious that it’s a “buying opportunity.” It will look like the beginning of a crash.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:03:56

March 14, 2013, 10:53 a.m. EDT
U.S. stock rally lifts S&P 500 near record
By Kate Gibson, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks advanced Thursday, lifting the S&P 500 index near its all-time closing high, as investors embraced an unexpected drop in weekly jobless claims.

Bolstering sentiment, the Labor Department reported initial applications for unemployment benefits declined by 10,000 to 332,000 last week.

Separately, the Labor Department reported a 0.7% jump in producer prices in February, boosted by a jump in gasoline prices.

Spencer Jakab reports February’s strong retail- sales figures set up a promising rest of 2013.

Extending gains into a 10th consecutive session, its longest streak in 16 years, the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA +0.41% climbed 57.71 points, or 0.4%, to 14,512.99.

The S&P 500 index SPX +0.35% rose 5.36 points, or 0.4%, to 1,559.88, leaving it 5 points shy of its record close set in October 2007.

Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 08:40:13

the economy is strong. 50 million on food stamps and going strong.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:56:14

Those 50 million on food stamps are stimulating food demand.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 09:04:09

By the end of Obama’s second term this country will spend more on food stamps than on the Pentagon, Medicare, and Social Security combined.

It’s true, it was in the Weekly Standard.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:06:26

March 14, 2013, 8:50 a.m. EDT
U.S. wholesale prices jump in February
All forms of energy cost more, but food prices drop
By Jeffry Bartash, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — U.S. wholesale prices climbed in February at the fastest rate in five months as the cost of gasoline and other forms of energy surged.

The producer price index rose a seasonally adjusted 0.7% in February, the Labor Department said Thursday. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had predicted a 0.8% increase.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:15:59

It’s time to sell Treasurys, buy the dollar and go headlong into stocks, says Citi
March 14, 2013, 10:50 AM

Equities are on a tear, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA +0.35% notching its longest winning streak since 1996 and the S&P 500 SPX +0.31% close to a record.

Investors shouldn’t get cold feet now, says Citigroup global macro strategist Jeremy Hale.

Hale and his team say U.S. growth could accelerate to about 3% in the second half of 2013 and for all of 2014, from a 0.1% annualized rate in the fourth quarter of 2012. This means the Federal Reserve could begin to slow its monthly asset purchases after the summer.

With the economy on the upswing, and the end to quantitative easing in sight, he’s outlined a series of moves to capitalize on these changing conditions.

Investors should sell U.S. Treasurys. If Citi’s economic forecasts are true, 10-year U.S. Treasury yields could gain another 50 to 100 basis points in 2013.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 11:14:17

Financial Times
March 13, 2013 6:51 pm
Beware monetary experimentation
By Martin Taylor
A little well-targeted fiscal relaxation feels less risky at this stage, Martin Taylor says

Suffering from persistently weak economies, governments and central banks are experimenting with ever more aggressive – some say dangerous – monetary treatments. Countries are being enrolled, like it or not, in the economic equivalent of clinical trials.

Before embarking on a new course of treatment, the doctors ought to inspect the patients in the wards next door. I found myself last month visiting two countries following diametrically opposite courses of treatment: Portugal, perhaps the least demonstrative sufferer on the eurozone periphery; and Argentina, which has long injected economic drugs not registered elsewhere. Both are instructive – and discouraging.

Portugal belongs to a strong currency bloc – its money functions as a real store of value, and convertibility is not in question. But the place is stony broke, and these advantages, so dear in the abstract to business people, have little appeal to residents with no money at all. The new roads built with EU funds are deserted, since they carry a toll; traffic has been displaced onto the roads they were designed to relieve. People prefer double-parking their ageing cars in the narrow streets to paying a euro or two at the shiny new car park. The receptionist in the empty hotel arrives, after a long wait, to serve you a drink in the bar; he later turns up as a waiter in the restaurant. Though they have the gentlest manners in Europe, the Portuguese have begun to express their frustration in a frank and vivid style of graffiti. Everything is on sale and no one is buying.

So poor Patient Fado, placed on an austerity-plus regime, is semi-comatose. The state spends as little as it can, and tries to extract ever more from its citizens, who seem to spend most of their time working out how to avoid paying. Fado’s ratios of indebtedness remain stubbornly high but the expensive foreign doctors believe a higher dose of the present medicine will, in the end, prove to be the right answer.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 15:52:22

Financial Times
March 14, 2013 8:36 pm
Fed rebukes Goldman and JPM plans
By Tom Braithwaite and Shahien Nasiripour and Washington and Tracy Alloway in New York

The Federal Reserve ordered Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase to improve their capital planning but approved tens of billions of dollars of dividends and share buybacks across the industry.

Goldman and JPMorgan, generally perceived as among the strongest Wall Street banks, were rebuked by the Fed for “qualitative” weaknesses in their procedures for planning payouts to shareholders.

Two other institutions had their capital plans blocked by the Fed: Ally Financial, majority-owned by the US government since its 2009 bailout, and BB&T, the regional lender.

The Fed did not set out the exact “weaknesses” that led the US central bank to require Goldman and JPMorgan resubmit their capital plans. But senior Fed officials said that discrepancies related to loss estimates and future revenue forecasts could have played a part.

Both Goldman and JPMorgan reported losses that were vastly lower than the Fed’s estimates when they unveiled the results of their own banking stress tests last week. Goldman forecast it would lose $6.6bn in a stressed market, about two-thirds lower than the Fed’s projection of $20.5bn. JPMorgan said it would lose just $200m – a fraction of the $32.3bn predicted by the Fed.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:02:09

Debunking Economics - Revised and Expanded Edition, now including a downloadable supplement for courses, exposes what many non-economists may have suspected and a minority of economists have long known: that economic theory is not only unpalatable, but also plain wrong. When the original Debunking Economics was published back in 2001, the market economy seemed invincible, and conventional “neoclassical” economic theory basked in the limelight. Steve Keen argued that economists deserved none of the credit for the economy’s performance, and “The false confidence it has engendered in the stability of the market economy has encouraged policy-makers to dismantle some of the institutions which initially evolved to try to keep its instability within limits.” That instability exploded with the devastating financial crisis of 2007, and now haunts the global economy with the prospect of another Depression. In this expanded and updated new edition, Keen builds on his scathing critique of conventional economic theory while explaining what mainstream economists cannot: why the crisis occurred, why it is proving to be intractable, and what needs to be done to end it. Essential for anyone who has ever doubted the advice or reasoning of economists, Debunking Economics - Revised and Expanded Edition provides a signpost to a better future.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:13:36

Iraq war costs U.S. more than $2 trillion: study

U.S. Navy Hospital Corpsman HM1 Richard Barnett, assigned to the 1st Marine Division, holds an Iraqi child in central Iraq in this March 29, 2003 file photo. REUTERS/Damir Sagolj

By Daniel Trotta
NEW YORK | Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:46am EDT

(Reuters) - The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest, a study released on Thursday said.

The war has killed at least 134,000 Iraqi civilians and may have contributed to the deaths of as many as four times that number, according to the Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University.

When security forces, insurgents, journalists and humanitarian workers were included, the war’s death toll rose to an estimated 176,000 to 189,000, the study said.

The report, the work of about 30 academics and experts, was published in advance of the 10th anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003.

Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 08:29:29

The war has killed at least 134,000 Iraqi civilians

I think it’s way more than that. No wonder Cheney needed a new heart. The old one just couldn’t take all the pain and guilt.

Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 08:42:13

how many people did saddam supposedly take out?

Comment by elle ven deep fried twinkies
2013-03-14 09:16:44

Way less than as purported by newcons.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 08:51:28

Iraq war costs U.S. more than $2 trillion: study

But:
“Bush even fired his top economic adviser, Lawrence Lindsey, for saying publicly that the war might cost between $100 billion and $200 billion…….”

The Cost Of War

http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/25/shared-sacrifice-war-taxes-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html

….In recent years, Republicans have been characterized by two principal positions: They like starting wars and don’t like paying for them. ………Republicans resolved to fight our wars on the cheap and with deceptive cost estimates. On the eve of war in December 2002, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) director Mitch Daniels claimed that the war in Iraq could be fought at a total cost of $50 billion to $60 billion. Indeed, Bush even fired his top economic adviser, Lawrence Lindsey, for saying publicly that the war might cost between $100 billion and $200 billion…….

…..Bush and his party, which controlled Congress from 2001 to 2006, never asked for sacrifices from anyone except those in our nation’s military and their families. I think that’s because the Republicans understood, implicitly, that the American people’s support for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has always been paper thin

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 12:50:37

“Bush even fired his top economic adviser, Lawrence Lindsey, for saying publicly that the war might cost between $100 billion and $200 billion…….”

I guess Bush realized how ridiculously low his estimate would turn out? Kind of like saying ’subprime will be contained to $200 bn…’

 
 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 09:08:30

They attacked us on 9/11 because they hate our freedoms.

We have to fight them over there so we won’t have to fight them over here.

Mission accomplished.

Power of pride.

These colors don’t run.

Freedom isn’t free.

Et cetera …

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 10:40:09

2. Trillion.

What is our current debt again? Now subtract the 2 TRILLION. Oh, and the $7 trillion bailouts.

Yep, it’s those damn unions and welfare bums ruining America. :roll:

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 11:19:00

it’s those damn unions and welfare bums ruining America. :roll:

The chart Dems love the Repubs to hate.

The single best chart on the policies driving our deficits — now updated!

“Tax cuts, wars account for nearly half of public debt by 2019″

Repeat:
“Tax cuts, wars account for nearly half of public debt by 2019″

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2013/02/parfait.jpg

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/28/the-single-best-chart-on-the-policies-driving-our-deficits-now-updated/

Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 13:12:39

Because, Lord Forbid, we actually SLOW down the rate of growth of government spending and government growth to match tax receipts.

Because buying votes doesn’t come cheap.

So now the US Government borrows almost 50 cents for every dollar it spend.

And what does it spend it on?

58% of the US Budget is spend on entitlements.
19% of the US Budget is spent on the military.

Them facts are tough to spin. But I know you can thumb through the democrat talking points and find something…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2011.png

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 14:50:39

4 trillion dollar war and 7 trillion dollar Wall St bailout.

Yep. That’s a lot of entitlements.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 14:58:23

Adapt or die: Which will it be?

March 14, 2013, 3:17 p.m. EDT · CORRECTED
Sen. Rand Paul calls for new Republican Party
By Greg Robb

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The Republican Party has grown “stale and moss-covered” and needs a fresh direction, said Sen. Rand Paul, the Republican Senator from Kentucky, on Thursday. In a speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference, Paul said Republicans should pay attention to the “Facebook generation” that wants to decriminalize drug use and opposes bank bailouts. Paul said the Republican Party must advocate economic opportunity. “We need a Republican Party that shows up on the south side of Chicago and shouts at the top of our lungs, we are the party of jobs and opportunity. The GOP is the ticket to the middle-class,” he said.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-14 15:23:05

So…should we watch what they say or what they do?

 
Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 23:18:23

“We need a Republican Party that shows up on the south side of Chicago and shouts at the top of our lungs, we are the party of jobs and opportunity. The GOP is the ticket to the middle-class,” he said.

No amount of shouting is going to create jobs or opportunity. The middle class has a choice of how fast it is going to drop its standard of living. Unless a miracle happens, and they’ve happened before.

 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 12:49:21

“…damn unions and welfare bums ruining America.”

Dang those lazy 47%ers!

 
 
Comment by rms
2013-03-14 23:11:09

“The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest, a study released on Thursday said.”

That’s chump change when the Western Wall hangs in the balance.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-03-14 08:19:06

Hey peeps, like this page some really cool hilarious and down right awful things to think about:

http://www.facebook.com/ChicksOnTheRight

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:46:49

So far, the stock market has been on a tear ever since sequestration. I guess this just goes to prove that cutting government and unleashing the private sector pays powerful economic dividends to the U.S. economy.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:52:04

Why The Sequester Is Good For Stocks
By Rick Newman
March 12, 2013

Who knew political dysfunction could be so lucrative for investors?

In the days leading up to the government spending cuts known as the sequester, politicians in Washington warned of all the bad things that were about to happen. But since March 1, when the cuts went into effect, the stock market has gone nowhere but up and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has repeatedly hit new highs.

The stock market, of course, could turn south any day, and the spending cuts could in fact harm the economy as time goes on and the impact builds.

But investors and politicians alike seem to have underestimated the tacit upside of the sequester, which will entail spending cuts totaling about $85 billion in 2013. “The markets feel a little bit better these days because of the sequester,” says Mike Thompson, managing director of global markets intelligence at S&P Capital IQ. “It cut through the hyperbole. It turned out it’s not that bad.”

The spending cuts affect the stock market in three basic ways. First, they show the private sector is getting closer to standing on its own, even when Washington is harming the economy. In fact, there’s been a surprising spate of good news recently about jobs, incomes, business spending and a pickup in manufacturing. The stock market’s rousing performance seems to be saying those developments are more important than what’s going on in Washington, which wasn’t the case a year or two ago.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-14 09:07:04

Or Wall Street is starting to disbelieve the “sky will fall if we don’t get our way” cries from politicians in Washington DC.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 09:23:04

Or the Plunge Protection Team pumped in an extra large pile of liquidity to buffer the stock market against probable declines on the sequester news.

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-14 09:55:47

Or perhaps a 2% cut in overall government spending wasn’t seen as being all that meaningful in the grand scheme of things.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 12:47:00

Too early to tell.

Northern Colorado Gazette
newspaper

Home
Register
RSS Feed
RSS Comments Feed
Contact
Log in

Mar 5, 2013
Fed’s “Recession Index” Trumps Sequester
by Michael McCune

Attention, class: The word of the day is “Sequester.”

Isn’t it funny how a word you really never heard before 2013 is now threatening to topple our economy? At least it is if you listen to the major media outlets you’d get that impression.

But they are wrong, Wrong, WRONG!!! The sequester does nothing of consequence. All the rampant speculation, all public hand-wringing, all public finger-pointing and teeth-gnashing aside, understand sequester does nothing of consequence. That is because all the consequences have already been etched into stone long before this sequester was reached.

The Federal Reserve insiders knew this fact last fall but said nothing as they are in lock-step with the Administration. The White House Office of Management and Budget knew this fact last fall but said nothing because they are officially in the Administration’s back pocket.

Ben Bernanke has been suspiciously non-committal about everything of importance. He warbles on and on about what might happen but essentially gives no new particulars about anything. The market applauds and the Administration points to the rising index levels as “proof its policies are turning the economy around.”

Yet inside the Fed, the certain knowledge another recession is looming has been in its hands since mid-November.

The certainty lies in the Fed’s “U.S. Recession Probabilities Index.” Since 1967 the Index has hit 20% six times. Every time, EVERY TIME, a recession struck soon after. The Index hit that magical 20% mark late last year.

Trying to find out exactly what is in the Index components was a breeze, figuring out how the Fed manages the data is not. The unspoken understanding is the Fed is using real economic data, not the government-generated data that still shows unemployment below 8% or an economic ”recovery”.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 08:54:52

March 14, 2013, 9:12 a.m. EDT
Fannie, Freddie reform bill introduced in Senate

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — A bill aiming to spur substantive reform of the government’s role in housing finance was introduced Thursday by a bipartisan group of senators. The “Jumpstart GSE Reform Act” would prevent Congress from using any increase in certain fees charged by mortgage buyers Fannie Mae FNMA +1.03% and Freddie Mac FMCC +4.42% to offset other government spending. In addition, the U.S. Department of the Treasury would be prohibited from selling its preferred shares in Fannie and Freddie without an OK from Congress and structural housing finance reform. Critics say that Congress and the administration have been too slow on reforming Fannie and Freddie, with many concerned about partisan discord preventing meaningful progress in the near term. The GSE bill, backed by Democrats and Republicans, aims to jump-start the reform process. “We know our housing finance system is not sustainable in its current form, and this legislation will keep us on a path to accomplish real reforms. We believe that as we transition Fannie and Freddie out of their present roles, we need to think about the system in its entirety,” said Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat of Virginia and one of the bill’s sponsors. The other Democrat sponsor is Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 08:56:55

Freddie Mac: Mortgage rates jump; 30-year fixed averages 3.63%

http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-freddie-mac-mortgage-rates-20130314,0,489766.story

Mortgage rates moved sharply higher this week, with Freddie Mac pegging the typical rate on a 30-year fixed loan at 3.63%, up from 3.52% last week and 3.31% last fall when it set an all-time record low.

Freddie Mac’s weekly survey of what lenders are offering to solid borrowers showed the average 15-year fixed mortgage rate rose from 2.76% last week to 2.79%. Borrowers would have paid 0.8% of the loan amount in upfront lender fees to obtain the rates.

Stronger-than-expected growth in jobs and consumer spending were factors, Freddie Mac said in releasing the report Thursday. The economy added 236,000 new workers in February while retail sales rose by 1.1%, well above expectations

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 09:18:35

Suppose someone can afford a $2000 fixed monthly mortgage payment over 30 years. The present value equivalent amount of mortgage loan principle this can support at 3.31% is $456,093.97.

At 3.63%, the present value of $2000 a month drops to $438,276.66 — a 4% drop in the amount of purchasing power for the same monthly payment. And this is with the Fed all-in on its $40 bn a month MBS purchases.

Just imagine how the bottom will drop out of housing demand when the Fed finally stops pumping in mortgage money. For instance, at a closer-to-normal 5% rate on a 30-year fixed, $2000 a month can only fund $372,563.23 in principle — 18.3 percent less than at 3.31%.

When mortgage interest rates revert to anywhere near historic norms, the losses to those who were suckered into buying at all-time low interest rates will be calculable — and massive.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 09:21:20

Thursday, March 7, 2013 - 14:18
US Mortgage Memo: NY Fed Buys Net $18.3B MBS In Week
By Isobel Kennedy

NEW YORK (MNI) - The New York Federal Reserve bought a net $18.3 billion Agency mortgage-backed securities in the week ended March 6 under its combined QE3 and monthly prepayment reinvestment programs.

The mortgage originators continue to sell 30-year “to-be-announced” or TBA paper with 3.00% and into the market and that is what the Fed continues to buy.

In the latest week the Fed bought a total of $11.8 billion Fannie Maes, Freddie Macs and Ginnie Maes with 3.00% coupon for delivery in April.

Market sources have noted that the Fed has been buying more Ginnie Maes lately. In the latest week, $3.5 billion of the 30-year 3.00% coupon buying was in Ginnies.

It also bought a total of $2.15 billion 15-year Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs with 2.50% coupons for April delivery in the latest week.

Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 10:17:31

they wont ever stop buying.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by (Now that I'm "diversified") Jetfixr
2013-03-14 10:51:48

The CAN’T ever stop buying…….

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 14:38:24

Don’t stop
Believing!

 
 
 
Comment by rms
2013-03-14 23:35:37

“For instance, at a closer-to-normal 5% rate on a 30-year fixed, $2000 a month can only fund $372,563.23 in principle — 18.3 percent less than at 3.31%.”

Isn’t 5% is too low for actual risk; 7-8% used to be normal for the 680 FICO millionaire. A 40% drop is baked-in at an 8% rate. Ouch!

 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 09:04:57

Here’s a lot of numbers on a lot of countries:

Investment Analysis
Global housing markets recovering!

http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/investment-analysis/Global-housing-markets-recovering

The world’s housing markets are strengthening, according to the latest survey of global house price trends released by the Global Property Guide. House prices rose in 24 of the 41 housing markets in our latest survey, which includes all countries which have so far published their housing statistics for the year 2012.

Inflation-adjustment: The Global Property Guide’s statistical presentation uses price changes after inflation, giving a more realistic picture than the more upbeat nominal figures usually preferred by real estate agents. Nominal figures can be misleading, as suggested by the fact that in 2012, nominal house prices rose in 27 countries and fell in only 14 countries.

Conclusion: House prices are rising in more countries than not, and the momentum trend is clearly upwards. Much of Europe is not sharing the joy, though the situation in Ireland and some of core Eastern Europe is improving.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-03-14 11:38:22

We used to hear ALOT about The Netherlands here.
From that article above:

The Netherlands comes third on the list of the world’s worst performers. House prices fell by 9.52% during 2012, the eighteenth consecutive quarter of year-on-year house price falls. On a quarterly basis, house prices dropped by 1.27% in Q4.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-14 09:32:37

This one’s for you CIBT. A good and measured article.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1271381-just-how-risky-are-reits

 
Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 10:48:27

Has anyone else noticed that the CPAC convention speaking roster for this year is stuffed with tea people? And LOL, Chris Christie and Jeb Bush couldn’t get a spot. But chickenhawk Ted Cruz gets 30 minutes. Better not tell the tea people that Cruz might’ve gotten admitted to an Ivy law school with some “assistance” from AA, wink wink. It might hurt his “bootstrapping” image.

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 12:21:58

Me and my buttbuddy John McC can’t believe they’re letting all those “wacko birds” speak at CPAC this year. It’s not fair!

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-03-14 13:19:47

Lemmie see if I understand democrat logic.

Chicken Hawk = someone who has never started or voted for a war a military action. Someone who opposes drone strikes on American citizens. Someone who has not killed any children.

Nobel Peace Prize Winner = someone who has started at least one war, doubled the personnel on the ground in another war and thinks it is A-OK to have a personal kill list of American citizens. Killing kids is a bonus but we just call it collateral damage.

Note to the kool-aid drinkers: Obama precisely followed the Bush plan for withdrawal from Iraq. No bonus democrat talking points for you.

All American military forces were mandated to withdraw from Iraqi territory by 31 December 2011 under the terms of a bilateral agreement signed in 2008 by President Bush. The U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq was completed on 18 December 2011 early Sunday morning.[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq

Comment by joe smith
2013-03-14 13:39:47

I’m not a Democrat and Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize is just another reason that award is a joke. No U.S. President has ever earned a Nobel Peace Prize IMO. Not Obama, not Clinton, not any of them.

You get a bonobo prize from me for being extremely lazy and dumb. You can’t be tasked with fielding anything but the most tired and idiotic responses, Cabana Boy.

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-03-14 17:43:12

“that award is a joke…”

They did say, IIRC, that they gave the award on the hope. I do believe, that many of my neighbors voted for this guy on the hope. I am not against people hoping in the least, except letting it go seems to be like the decade long Five Stages of Grief.

It would cheer me up if the Nobel Peace Prize guys asked for the medal back. Like when a champion athlete turns out to be a druggie.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 13:51:32

It’s still Bush’s fault. And if another Democrat gets elected in 2016, it will still be Bush’s fault until at least 2021.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 16:32:31
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-03-14 11:05:28

FHA Watch, March 2013 (Vol. 2, No. 2)
Edward J. Pinto | American Enterprise Institute
March 14, 2013

FHA Fairy Tales
A number of fairy tales were told by FHA Commissioner Carol Galante in remarks on March 7 at J.P. Morgan’s Securitized Products Research Conference. FHA Watch separates fact from fiction in this new recurring feature.

Fairy Tale #1: “The books of business originated since 2010 are the strongest in agency history, in terms of underlying credit quality, measured by any standard.”

Over its first 20 years, the FHA paid only 5,712 claims out of 2.9 million insured mortgages, for a cumulative claim rate of 0.2 percent. At the same time, claim loss severity was only 9 percent of the original insured mortgage balance, or a total of $3 million on 5,712 claims.

Compare this cumulative claim rate over 20 years of 0.2 percent to the projected annual claim rates for 2010, 2011, and 2012 of 8.24 percent, 5.61 percent, and 4.13 percent, respectively. Or how about claim loss severity rates? Instead of 9 percent, today the FHA has a loss severity rate of 63 percent. [which tends to supports RAL's contention that housing is 65% overvalued, at least in heavy FHA-loan areas.]

Fairy Tale #2: “Lender overlays are damaging the recovery by limiting access to creditworthy borrowers. . . . The obligation that I have is to ensure that lenders using the FHA program are lending to as full a spectrum of the credit box as possible. . . . FHA has learned some lessons, and we want these mortgages to be sustainable.”

First, a word about lender credit overlays. While the FHA’s minimum FICO credit score to get approved for a 3.5 percent down payment loan is 580, most FHA lenders prudently “overlay” a credit score requirement of at least 640. While this is due to many factors, two top the list. First, a 3.5 percent down payment loan with a 580 FICO, a 30-year term, and a 45 percent debt-to-income (DTI) ratio historically has about a 1 in 4 chance of foreclosure. Most banks do not want to subject their customers and community to such an excessive failure rate. Second, the potential liability for an enforcement action rises exponentially when a loan has an expected 25 percent default rate.

http://www.aei.org/article/fha-watch-march-2013/ [download the PDF from the link at the bottom of the table of contents]

 
Comment by mmrtnt
2013-03-14 12:07:42

Incalculable

“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Comment by ecofeco
2013-03-14 12:47:39

Indubitably.

 
 
Comment by Montana
2013-03-14 13:02:50

HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 13:28:47

Buy stocks now or get priced out forever!

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-03-14 13:28:41

“Get what you can get for your house today because it’s going to be much less tomorrow for many years to come.”

Comment by Lindsey Graham Cracker
2013-03-14 13:49:21

Recent buyers in suburban Maryland became instantly underwater and will remain underwater for years to come.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-03-14 14:16:50

Prime Atlantis real estate! They aren’t making anymore underwater land, you know.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-03-14 14:00:36

What’s really going on in California

California imposed a new law on banks innocuously called “Homeowners Bill of Rights” which forces banks to switch over to a judicial foreclosure process, which they can opt to do on their own, but takes a year or more to renegotiate contracts and compensation structures for the foreclosure law firms who do all the leg work for the banks. And while those changes are being made… it makes it appear that foreclosures have slowed down dramatically in the state.

The reality?

Defaults (undeclared) are spiraling upward that yet have to pass through the foreclosure pipeline.

The truth?

California is still the highest foreclosure state in sheer volume and percentage.

The low-down?

Resale housing is still massively overpriced as a result of unprecedented interference by individual states and the federal government. The market distortions will be removed and the down draft will continue allowing the market to correct.

If you play with fire, you will get burned.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 14:56:25

How can one avoid playing with fire when everything around you is going up in smoke?

 
 
Comment by anngogh
2013-03-14 14:13:14

Thank goodness someone has saved the mortgage market!

The home mortgage sector in the world’s largest economy has been “effectively nationalized,” says George Melloan, former deputy editor of the editorial page for The Wall Street Journal.

Government agencies — primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but also the Federal Housing Administration — insured or purchased more than 90 percent of home mortgages originated in 2012, a $1.3 trillion business, compared with 30 percent in 2006, according to ProPublica data.

Melloan, author of “The Great Money Binge: Spending Our Way to Socialism,” traced the situation back to the end of the last century, citing government and “powerful” lobbies.

“When President [Bill] Clinton forced the banks to begin their subprime mortgage binge in the 1990s, he called it ‘affordable housing’ for people with limited means, a politically appealing idea,” Melloan wrote in an opinion article for The Journal.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/FinanceNews/Melloan-Fannie-Freddie-banks/2013/03/14/id/494678?s=al&promo_code=12CDB-1#ixzz2NYD258wE

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 15:18:19

Black Man With A Gun
Gun Blog and Podcast

Welcome to the Black Man With A Gun Blog and The Urban Shooter Podcast Portal.

Gun Variety Show and Blog.

I blog and produce a podcast called The Urban Shooter that you can get free on your computer, and on iTunes or Stitcher radio. It’s a weekly, listener supported fun filled variety show for all law abiding gun owners, recreational shooters, hunters, air-soft, air-gun, and paintball enthusiasts of the world. It’s silly, it’s fun, it’s inspiration and I hope it’s for you.

I provide encouragement to my listeners, information, entertainment and inspiration. I support small businesses with voice-overs, commercials and social marketing.

I am Rev. Kenn Blanchard

Since 1991, I have been involved in the right to keep and bear arms activism. I am a former US Marine, Federal Police Officer and protective specialist and speaker like no other. I started a national gun club for people of color called the Tenth Cavalry Gun Club “the Buffalo Soldiers”. Today it is known as the Maryland Tenth Cavalry Gun Club, LLC and is doing great.

I have been involved internationally representing African Americans that shoot. It wasn’t intentional. I knew I wasn’t the only one that owned a gun nor was I alone in my beliefs. I was just the only one you could put your finger on easily. It changed my approach and outlook on a few things. In the beginning all I wanted to do was be a resource in my community for firearms instruction. I wanted to use my gift of being able take complex things and make them easier to understand into a business model that made the community safer. I had no idea the opposition I was to encounter within. I didn’t know the history. I didn’t know the racist roots of gun control. I only saw what racism did to the minds of people that looked like me.

When I started online everyone had dial up. Thanks for finding me.

Since 1991, I’ve been involved in almost every pro-rights event that involved a person of color. If I was not doing it personally, I probably helped in the recruiting or vetting of a plaintiff. I work with all the pro rights organizations, the National Rifle Association, the Law Enforcement Alliance of America, the Second Amendment Foundation, the CATO Institute, Gun Owners of America, and the list continues. And I’ve worked with groups that have come and gone.

I have lobbied the US Congress. I have testified in the state legislatures of Virginia, Texas, South Carolina, Michigan, Maryland, and Wisconsin. I have done commercials for TV against racist gun laws and been featured in three documentaries. I have debated nationally known anti-second amendment people on national television.

Since 2007, I have been the pastor of Baptist church that doesn’t condone, agree or support my beliefs in the right to keep and bear arms but that is ok.

The Urban Shooter Podcast.

It is here that I passionately, positively and persistently produce this podcast to encourage, educate and enlighten people around the world that want it.

I sing, I joke, I interview interesting people I have met or hear of that are not afraid of coming on a show where they might find a new friend.

The podcast is not just about guns its about the people behind the guns. It’s the unsung heroes of our communities. It’s the women, mothers and sexy grandmothers that choose to arm themselves. It’s those that hunt and compete too, (the women) that folks like to ignore or pimp only on special occasions.

This show is about all nationalities, ethnicities, white, black, brown, yellow and every combination in between that shoot, own guns and fight to do so because of misinformation and racism. It’s for the urbanite and rural shooter. It’s for America.

Kenn Blanchard is the Black Man WIth Gun
http://kennblanchard.com/landing/black-man-with-a-gun-2 - 24k

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-03-14 16:05:56

I was afraid it was going to be an archived post from Dorner.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower©
2013-03-14 15:54:50

Dang zombie whale!

Financial Times
March 14, 2013 9:00 pm
JPMorgan accused of lying over $6bn loss
By Tom Braithwaite and Shahien Nasiripour in Washington

JPMorgan Chase “misled investors” before “lying to investigators” about its $6bn trading losses, John McCain, the senior Republican on the US Senate panel investigating the affair, has alleged.

Mr McCain’s comments came on Thursday as the Senate subcommittee published its bipartisan findings into the trading, risk management failures and subsequent disclosures that marked last year’s so-called “London whale” episode.

The 300-page report hones in on disclosures by Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JPMorgan, and Doug Braunstein, who resigned as chief financial officer after the affair came to light.

Mr Dimon had initially played down the significance of credit derivatives trading activity in the bank’s London chief investment office during an earnings call in April last year, saying it was “a tempest in a teapot”.

However, the Senate report found that he was “already in possession of information about the . . . complex and sizeable portfolio, its sustained losses for three straight months, the exponential increase in those losses during March and the difficulty of exiting the . . . positions”.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-03-14 16:19:13

And nobody knows how to grab the spotlight quite like John McCain.

Comment by Resistor
2013-03-14 18:12:09

“And nobody knows how to grab the spotlight quite like John McCain.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chuiyXQKw3I

 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-03-14 16:52:38

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100554470

Everything’s just fine…nothing to see here.

Comment by azdude
2013-03-14 19:46:30

as long as wall street is making money there are no problems.

 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-03-14 17:36:35

Update from the Gunshine State:

- The abandoned house across the street from me is now occupied by the realtor that abandoned the house next to me.

- The abandoned house next to me was just purchased at auction by a flipper. The flipper, a reasonably nice guy, just introduced himself and told me if I know anyone looking to buy he’d give me a finder’s fee. He then asked if I wanted to buy it. I apologized for being an asshole. Nobody in my ‘hood rings doorbells. You’re either outside, or you aren’t. In a different ‘hood, someone might have stood their ground at such a knock.

- The abandoned house behind me is being renovated by a guy “who is being paid by some company.”

- Spring Break is full throttle this year. No vacancies, traffic like a mofo, lines out the door, etc. Speaking of Spring Break, and Pinellas, this looks… silly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVvn9T6bqls

- The last of my neighbs vehicles was REPO’d. Hats off to the repo man. My bedroom window is adjacent to the neighbs driveway. The windows have been open thanks to the amazingly cool weather… didn’t hear a sound. My neighb, a soon to be X-chopper-Fixr, is, well, running out of time. Like their cars, I suspect they will soon disappear into the night.

Comment by Resistor
2013-03-14 18:22:37

“The flipper, a reasonably nice guy”

Minus his domestic battery charge. Gotta live FL public records searches.

 
Comment by hazard
2013-03-14 19:23:07

“- The abandoned house across the street from me is now occupied by the realtor that abandoned the house next to me.”

“- The abandoned house next to me was just purchased at auction by a flipper.”

Stealers Wheel -stuck in the middle with u - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpWzbZGk3eA - 212k -

Comment by Anngogh
2013-03-14 20:01:37

Went to see my property manager to tell her about the coyote in my yard and to make sure the restoration company takes my name off the claims for the three leaks last year. Anyway, I mentioned I’d like to live in a better rental and she told me my landlord was a slumlord and then trotted in a realtor who gave me some guys name to get pre qualified for a home loan. I swear this San Diego bubble is never going to pop.
BTW is Lindsey graham cracker really faster pussycat?

Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-03-14 20:07:06

No…. Lindsay is LouMinatti.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ann gogh
2013-03-15 08:40:20

I recognized the style but couldn’t be sure. thnx

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-03-14 17:49:21

Tom Waits
“In The Neighborhood”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmTcSGukO4o

Comment by Resistor
2013-03-14 18:40:41

Man, what a genius.
—————–

Well the eggs chase the bacon
round the fryin’ pan
and the whinin’ dog pidgeons
by the steeple bell rope
and the dogs tipped the garbage pails
over last night
and there’s always construction work
bothering you
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood

Friday’s a funeral
and Saturday’s a bride
Sey’s got a pistol on the register side
and the goddamn delivery trucks
they make too much noise
and we don’t get our butter
delivered no more
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood

Well Big Mambo’s kicking
his old grey hound
and the kids can’t get ice cream
’cause the market burned down
and the newspaper sleeping bags
blow down the lane
and that goddamn flatbed’s
got me pinned in again
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood

There’s a couple Filipino girls
gigglin’ by the church
and the windoe is busted
and the landlord ain’t home
and Butch joined the army
yea that’s where he’s been
and the jackhammer’s diggin’
up the sidewalks again
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood
In the neighborhood

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 20:23:47

Concern: Who Will Buy U.S. Treasuries if the Fed Exits Quantitative Easing?
Finance
By Michael Lombardi, Published March 14, 2013

One of the biggest debates amongst American economists these days is whether the Federal Reserve’s continued $85.0-billion-a-month expansion of the money supply is making the U.S. economy more vulnerable, as opposed to helping strengthen the economy. One of the main reasons the central bank took on quantitative easing in the first place was to revive the financial system following the housing slump. After a $3.0 trillion increase in the Fed’s balance sheet, should the central bank put the brakes on money printing?

Federal Reserve Governor Daniel K. Trullo said late last week, “Significant increase in both the quality and quantity of bank capital during the past four years help ensure that banks can continue to lend to consumers and businesses, even in times of economic difficulty.” (Source: Federal Reserve, March 7, 2013.)

While this may be good news, I am more concerned about what may be next—the “exit” of a monetary policy, which in the eyes of many has now gone on for too long. As noted above, through quantitative easing, the Federal Reserve has added a significant amount of assets to its balance sheet.

How will it decrease its balance sheet and bring it back to historical levels? On one hand, the idea is that the Federal Reserve can continue to hold the bonds it has bought until maturity. On the other hand, the option is to go out into the open market and sell the bonds it has accumulated.

While these options sound feasible, I see them as troubling. If the Fed sells the bonds it has in the open market, then the prices of bonds will collapse due to an increased supply. A simple rule of economics: when the supply increases, prices go lower. In addition, it could cause borrowing costs or interest rates to rise significantly if there are no takers for the bonds. On the other hand, if the Federal Reserve holds its bond purchases until maturity, such action may be taken as an indication that there are no buyers for the bonds, thus, the Fed is forced to hold onto them—this creates investor uncertainty, which is bad for any market.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 20:27:26

Investing Strategies
Gundlach on Why Quantitative Easing Will End Badly
By Chris Ciaccia 03/06/13 - 09:43 AM EST

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — Jeff Gundlach, CEO and chief investment officer of Doubleline Capital, spoke about quantitative easing and said he doesn’t know when it will end. But when it does, he said, it won’t be pretty.

Gundlach, who manages DoubleLine Total Return Bond (DBLTX_), said the four major central banks around the world — the Bank of Japan, Federal Reserve, Bank of England and the European Central Bank — are all firmly in easing mode, expanding their balance sheets at an average rate of 3.5% per year. Many have talked about when the central banks, particularly the Fed, will end quantitative easing, or QE. But this is the wrong question. The Fed will continue to expand its balance sheet not for months, but for years.

“It’s not slowing down anytime soon,” Gundlach said during a presentation.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 20:28:52

March 14, 2013, 7:05 p.m. EDT
J.P. Morgan in government cross hairs
Senate London whale report, Fed stress test shine harsh light on nation’s largest bank
By Sital S. Patel

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — J.P. Morgan, the nation’s largest bank by assets, suffered a double blow on Thursday after it was charged by a Senate committee with misleading regulators and investors over massive credit derivatives losses and saw its plans to return capital to shareholders questioned by the government.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:41:16

Even as a mere child, I lived under the warm impression that we lived in a society subject to a rule of law, and that our financial services industry was part of the civilized, law-abiding part of society.

Now that I am older and more cynical, I take the impression that illegal activity is the norm in the financial services industry, with propaganda used to cover it up with the facade of legitimacy.

Is our society gradually disintegrating, or was I simply naive when I was young, lacking perspective on what now seems shockingly obvious?

Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 23:25:38

Is our society gradually disintegrating, or was I simply naive when I was young, lacking perspective on what now seems shockingly obvious?
Yes to both. Being young almost equates to being naive and lacking perspective. Things are always disintegrating, and new things are coming into being.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:45:45

Why would it be in Congress’s interest to end ‘too-big-to-jail’?

There is no native criminal class except Congress.
– Mark Twain

Congress must end ‘too big to jail’
By Stefanie Ostfeld, campaigner, Global Witness - 03/07/13 09:00 AM ET

Today, a Senate Banking Committee hearing will examine the extent, causes, and consequences of banks’ failure to adhere to anti-money laundering laws, and the laxity of regulators who are meant to keep the banks in line.

The hearing – entitled “Patterns of Abuse: Assessing Bank Secrecy Act Compliance and Enforcement” – follows a string of banking scandals that have raised serious questions about financial institutions’ compliance with anti-money laundering rules. Illicit flows of money through the financial system have been linked to corruption, international drug trafficking organizations, terrorist groups and sanctioned nations.

One recent example is HSBC, which was fined a record $1.9 billion in December by the U.S. authorities for doing business with Mexican drug lords, terrorists and pariah states, including Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Burma.

And yet, even though HSBC admitted failing to apply legally required money-laundering controls to $200 trillion in wire transfers, there have been no criminal prosecutions.

These are not victimless crimes, but have a very serious human cost. Forty seven thousand people died in drug related violence while HSBC was laundering drug money. 

Questions are rightly being asked as to the degree to which the Treasury Department influenced the decision not to prosecute HSBC. Rumors are circulating that the DOJ even had indictments ready to go but that Treasury insisted that they be held back.

The worrying signals sent by the HSBC affair are that profit trumps the law and banks and bankers will continue to get away with wrongdoing – regardless of any change in rhetoric. For the banks, the potential rewards far exceed the possible fines, and are not offset by the apparently minimal risk of prosecution. So why should they change their behavior?

Comment by tresho
2013-03-14 23:29:18

the decision not to prosecute
is up to the prosecutors and not to anyone else, AFAICT. Who appoints federal prosecutors?
That’s where the changes must be made, though I doubt they will be made.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:46:56

Sen. Warren: Drug dealers go to jail; bankers for drug cartel pay a fine
March 7, 2013, 2:45 PM

Sen. Elizabeth Warren waded back into the too-big-to-jail debate in a Senate Banking Committee hearing Thursday.

If you are caught with an ounce of cocaine, there is a good chance you will go to jail, she noted. However, if you are a bank that “laundered nearly a billion dollars for drug cartels and violated international sanctions, your company pays a fine,” Warren pointed out. Read about Holder admitting big banks are too big to jail.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:50:14

Accelerating price appreciation on ever-thinning volume…haven’t we seen this movie before?

March 14, 2013, 5:47 p.m. EDT
As stocks extend gains, volume gets even thinner
Trading volume drops below averages for month, year
By Wallace Witkowski, MarketWatch

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — As the Dow Jones Industrial Average logged its 10th day of gains and the S&P 500 Index neared a closing high Thursday, one thing has been missing from the rally: volume.

That’s a telling difference from when the Dow industrials DJIA +0.58% last had a run of ten consecutive sessions of gains in November 1996.

On Thursday, the Dow industrials finished up 83.86 points, or 0.6%, at 14,539.14, for a new closing record, its eighth in a row. Read more on Thursday’s stocks.

Also, the S&P 500 Index SPX +0.56% advanced 8.71 points, or 0.6%, at 1,563.23, just 1.92 points shy of its all-time high close set in October 2007. Read S&P 500 all-time high stocks most since 2004.

But like much of March, Thursday trading volumes were below average. Daily volume for stocks on the NYSE Euronext’s NYX +1.05% New York Stock Exchange topped 3.4 billion shares, and stocks listed on the Nasdaq OMX Group’s NDAQ +1.49% Nasdaq Stock Market topped 1.6 billion shares.

Daily trading volume for NYSE-listed shares has steadily declined from its 3.76 billion shares traded on March 1, according to WSJ/Dow Jones data.

The average daily volume over the 10 days ended Thursday, the period of the Dow streak, was 3.47 billion shares, below the average of 3.5 billion for the past 50 days. Also, the March average is about 12% off last year’s.

Similarly for Nasdaq-listed shares, daily composite volume has fallen from 1.85 billion shares on March 1, for an daily average of 1.7 billion shares over that period. That’s below an average of 1.8 billion shares for the past 50 days, and about 10% below last year’s March average.

The last time there was a Dow industrials rally like the current one was in November 1996. Back then, volume was a lot lower than today, but in contrast to this recent streak, volume in the mid-1990s streak rose as the run lengthened.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:52:46

Oh what a tangled web we weave
When at first we practice to deceive.

Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:56:53

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is accused of hiding information about big losses

Justin Sullivan/GETTY IMAGES - The Federal Reserve on Thursday granted conditional approval of JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs’ plans to return capital to shareholders.

By Danielle Douglas, Thursday, March 14, 5:59 PM

Washington dealt a double blow Thursday to JPMorgan Chase as a Senate report accused its iconic chief executive of hiding information about a massive loss from regulators while the Federal Reserve unexpectedly said it had found a “weakness” in the bank’s capital plans.

The twin announcements, both unveiled in the late afternoon, escalates the problems for JPMorgan, the nation’s largest bank and arguably its most prestigious. Once viewed as the strongest bank to emerge from the 2008 financial crisis, the firm on Thursday watched its weaker rivals, Bank of America and Citigroup, sail through the Fed’s examination.

Meanwhile, the bank’s capital plans contain “weakness,” the Fed says.

Perhaps more pressing is a report from the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which plans to hold a hearing Friday to probe the behavior of current and former senior bank executives as they tried to contain the fallout from a series of damaging trades, initiated by a trader known as the “London Whale.” The bets ultimately cost the bank about $6.2 billion.

The Senate report is the first to suggest that JPMorgan’s chief executive Jamie Dimon was less than forthright with regulators as he learned of the mounting losses. To date, Dimon has acknowledged that the bank failed to manage its risks, which allowed the bad trades to persist.

The report takes the bank to task for hiding losses for three months last year, overstating the value of its trading positions and ignoring red flags. When regulators grew concerned, JPMorgan withheld information about the nature of the portfolio, Senate investigators say.

At one point, the bank was providing regulators daily profit and loss statements from its investment division so they could see what was going on. But Dimon put a stop to it. When one of his subordinates resumed the updates, “Dimon reportedly raised his voice in anger,” the Senate report said.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-14 21:58:49

How is keeping banksters who commit crimes against society out of prison in society’s interest?

How Modern Finance Promises to Break the Cycle of Recidivism

By Paul Solman

A new type of financial investment being pioneered in the United Kingdom may be the key for breaking the cycle of recidivism — and it could be coming soon to a prison near you.

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-03-15 00:18:36

Who’d be crazy enough to buy bonds at this point? (Raises hand…)

P.S. Uncle Sam’s ultra-cheap borrowing cost are investors’ loss.

P.P.S. The analysis below is wrong, as it doesn’t consider the potential for deflation to increase real returns on bonds to a level above nominal returns. For instance, even if nominal returns on bonds went all the way down to zero, deflation could generate positive real returns. So the “mathematical truth” mentioned below is actually a “mathematical error.”

March 12, 2013, 5:30 a.m. EDT
The shocking truth about bond forecasting
By Todd Tresidder

Forget all the bond market forecasts you see today. They will only distract you from focusing on what is essential to making a smart investment decision — risk versus reward analysis.

The reality is nobody knows if the final top for the bond market is now or three years from now. It is a fool’s errand to play forecasting games because the future can’t be reliably predicted. Asset allocation decisions based on forecasts have no known mathematical expectation: They are a gamble instead of an investment.

Smart investment decisions should only be made based on what is known — not projected. In the bond market, we know the risk to reward ratio makes no investment sense over a long-term time horizon (10-30 years) and that’s more than enough to make a smart investment decision. Here are the facts:

* Interest rates peaked in September 1981 and have been falling ever since to reach extreme lows today.

* 2013 provides the most difficult environment for generating income in 140 years according to O’Shaughnessy Asset Management. Since 1871 there has never been a lower yield period in history — not even close.

* The historical yield on a 60% equity/40% bond portfolio has averaged 4.36% and is now at an all-time low of just 2.0%.

* Since 1790 the U.S. has never been able to borrow long-term capital (30-year bond rates) more cheaply than it can right now.

* According to Timely Portfolios, if the 10-Year U.S. Treasuries (constant maturity similar to IEF) went to their theoretical minimum - zero - the total remaining upside is a paltry 17% gain. In other words, if interest rates went as far as they could theoretically go on the downside the entire upside left on 10-Year Treasuries is a mere 17%.

* With that said, your actual returns would depend on how long it took to reach the theoretical limit. For example, Market Sci blog showed that if it took 4 years to reach zero then the annualized return would be just 5% and the total return would be 21.6%.

* If you assume a more realistic downside limit like Japan’s record low yield for their 10-Year Note at 0.47% then the maximum remaining upside is reduced to a mere 13.8%. If it takes four years to get there your annual return is just 4.1% with a total return of 17.6 — before inflation! If you net out inflation, the real return is minuscule at best.

The implication is clear — the upside potential in bonds is extremely limited. This is not opinion or prediction: it is mathematical truth. However, that is only the first half of the reward to risk analysis investors must make.

Unfortunately, the second half of the analysis - risk - is also unfavorable for bond investors because interest rates are at historic lows. Again, it is simple mathematics that cause this situation because a modest rise in rates from today’s low levels could cause disproportionately large losses potentially dwarfing any income received in the interim.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post