Friday evening and Saturday, yes. Yesterday, no.
I am enjoying (very) slowly trying (and not quite succeeding) to improve the yard.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 06:39:40
I stopped off at my HD twice this weekend to get mulch and annuals for my house and my in-laws. Parking lot was full around 1pm and again around 4pm on Saturday. First 60 degree day here in 2013 explains part of that, though. It’s usually only half full (largely contractors) but Saturday it was homedebtors. You can tell because of the confused looks when homedebtors come face to face with 14 varieties of insulation or 31 different hammer drills.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 06:46:10
Contractors don’t frequent HomeCheapo.
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-04-01 06:58:29
Honest folk were out raking the yard Saturday. Now it’s snowing again. Set to bounce back up into the 60s. Time to launch the cabin cruiser pretty soon! Must get off land before the debt donkey cottagers migrate back.
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 07:11:43
Pimp, do you have any suggestions as to where to buy home stuff? Or could you tell me what, if anything, from Home Depot/Lowe’s is acceptable? Their lumber is probably not as good. But HBB had a huge discussion that hand tools like hammers are just as good. And plumbers tell me that the fixtures from Home Despot and Lowe’s, especially the higher end, are no different than you would get in any pro showroom. I visited four showrooms looking for a vanity and decided on one from Lowe’s. And really, how can you screw up mulch and annual flowers?
Comment by scdave
2013-04-01 07:25:08
Contractors don’t frequent HomeCheapo ??
Thats the biggest lie that I have seen in quite sometime…Go look at the parking lot @ 6:30 AM and tell me who is shopping…Gee’s…What BS…
Comment by Rancher
2013-04-01 07:26:18
HD and Lowe’s carry mid range tools and materials. A professional would never shop there. An example: The new types of four
or eight foot florescent shop lamps look identical to those at the electrical wholesale house until you look at the ballasts. The ones
from HD or L’s are much smaller, noisier, less efficient, and can give you the high frequency
flicker effect. And the tools? All mid-range
in quality and price.
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-04-01 07:36:16
My local lumber yard in general carries higher quality tools than Low’s. Just my experience. They also have a price advantage on building supplies, if you have an account. They also deliver stuff for free. They also have lower prices on bulk fastners.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-04-01 07:39:43
I see all sorts of contractors at my local HD, especially buying lumber.
They go wherever it’s convenient and they can get a good deal, when they’re buying materials. They may buy their personal tools from Snap-On or some such, but that’s not a daily purchase.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 07:49:57
Well yeah, I live in the city, these contractors are the kind of guys needing relatively small amounts of supplies in a timely fashion, not their heavy duty tools. Lots of homes in my area get gutted out and redone one room or floor at a time and many of these contractors are small operators, not big remodeling companies. They may need a few pieces of dry wall or a bucket of thin set etc. Any morning at 6-7am it’s busy and the lot is 1/2 full of F350s, panel vans, and similar. Lots of these guys seem to pick up day labor (of the brown skinned variety) in the parking lot as well.
On weekends is when you see the homedebtors out in force. They seem to have no idea what they’re doing.
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-04-01 07:53:42
Homedebt is an addiction. Low’s is the porn shop.
Comment by scdave
2013-04-01 08:01:16
And the tools? All mid-range in quality and price ??
Really…Hilti….Bosch…..Mid-range quality ??
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 08:02:27
@Blue Skye - I agree with you, I was just answering the question posed, whether or not HD in the area seems to be busy. Unfortunately, the answer is yes.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 08:14:26
HD and Lowes don’t carry the same thing in all stores.
This applies to tools, colors of cabinets, etc.
The HD near me sells Bosch, Milwaukee, DeWalt, Hilti, etc. They also sell mid and lower level stuff like Ryobi.
Maybe where Rancher lives it doesn’t make sense (because of store volume) to carry so many brands?
HD in my area has a big advantage in terms of location - if you’re doing a job in Fells Point or Canton, you can be at HD in 5 or 6 minutes, whereas if you want to go to some specialty store it’s going to take alot [sic] more time.
The other “advantage” HD has is easy credit. Don’t have cash on you? Just give them your HD card or your phone number.
The other competitor with a similar location advantage is Grainger, but that’s on the other side of the harbor tunnel if you’re working in Canton/Fells Point (where the good reno jobs are). I also don’t think Grainger is as convenient as HD and it’s not geared towards the same type of work.
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 08:18:53
scdave, Hilti and Bosch might make a lower-end line for HD and Lowe’s. Sure it cheapens the brand value but money is money, right? The same thing happened to Calphalon cookware when they offered a cheaper line at Tar-jhay.
Blue, I’m tired of answering you.
Comment by scdave
2013-04-01 08:31:55
Hilti and Bosch might make a lower-end line for HD and Lowe’s ??
I don’t think so…I have seen the full line of their tools at the international homebuilders shows…They are the same…
Lowe’s & HD target two segments…Sub-contractor and Mom & Pop homeowner…I am not sure which provides more revenue but my bet would be the contractor segment…
The time when Lowe’s or HD may not make sense is on large orders…Lets say 8 units of drywall or 6 units of studs…They are just not geared for that type of volume sale or delivery…
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-04-01 08:34:57
I understand Oxy, you don’t need to answer me.
The debt service though, tiring as it may be, you have to answer that. If I ever wished you any misfortune, I would have encouraged it.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 08:42:59
Let me say it again so I’m clear.
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Do I need to say it again?
Here…
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Now…. let me ask. How many of you are contractors? How many of you execute $100 million or more of work a year? How about $10million? about $2 million? That’s right…. not a single one of you.
For my E contracts…. do you really think Home Cheapo junk meets spec? I’m here to tell you it doesn’t. And what is there is 2x the cost of a supply house. How about drop ins with battery backup? Get real. Go ahead…. go down to home cheapo and ask for a gasketed Quazite box. Report back to me your experience.
For P contracts….. Do you really think HomeCheapo has Terrazzo prec-cast shower pans? Really? Do you think Cheapo can provide something as simple as copper tubing for less than a supply house? They can’t and don’t. Supply houses are a fraction of the cost of Cheapo.
For structural and architectural IFS/EFS contracts…. do you really think you’ll find 18 gauge steel studs? And after I’m done waiting 2 weeks for Cheapo to source them and get them to my site, I’m going to pay them triple over what my competitors pay at a supply house?
Let me say it again for the benefit of the brainwashed housign junkies and ham and eggers….
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-04-01 09:02:23
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Then they pay people to pretend they’re contractors, and to drive white work vans and the like, and to buy big batches of lumber there.
Or maybe you’re wrong.
Comment by Crab Cakes
2013-04-01 09:11:28
Stop being a douche. You’re a builder or General Contactor, obviously you wouldn’t go to home depot. Plenty of small contractors, small businesses and subs shop at home depot. Key word here is small. Bobody was saying that All contractors shop there. Now before you say I don’t know what I am talking about I will let you know that I own a small business and I do shop there.
Get off your high horse…. Sheesh..
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 09:13:46
Here:
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
And you go to Cheapo because you’re not a contractor.
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 09:42:32
“The debt service though, tiring as it may be, you have to answer that. ”
Why?
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-04-01 09:47:34
“The debt service though, tiring as it may be, you have to answer that. ”
Why?
Unless you are wealthy or have inherited a house, you either pay rent to a landlord or you pay to rent money from the bank.
In some locations, the monthly costs are similar. The choice from there is based on your lifestyle, your career, your family, and your personal tastes.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 09:51:17
And at current inflated asking prices of resale housing, paying rent is half the monthly cost of buying.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 09:54:26
Pimp is being a douche. I laid out the kind of work these guys do, obviously it isn’t big projects or new construction.
Where’s the prestige in being a contractor, are we supposed to be impressed? Like oh wow they can get 5000 sheets of drywall at a lower unit price than I can get 25 sheets. Amazing!
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 09:55:42
you either pay rent to a landlord or you pay to rent money from the bank.
You left out (3) pay rent to the government (4) have someone else pay to house you or (5) sleep in a hollow log or cardboard box.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 09:57:31
No… You’re backpedalling because you jumped in a conversation too early figuring I wasn’t going to back myself up.
A harpsichordist and part time barrister is now pretending to be a contractor. You go girl!
Comment by SUGuy
2013-04-01 10:12:57
I buy some of the stuff from Erie materials for my building. They do deliver and have a helpful technical center. They designed and ordered a cricket for part of my torch down roof 2 years ago and it worked out quite well.
Comment by SUGuy
2013-04-01 10:27:59
Electrical stuff from Greybar and the Heating/ Air conditioning stuff from Total Line
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 10:32:16
Where could I buy aluminum siding? I have some patching & panel revision to do, but no local contractor seems to be interested in using aluminum. Aluminum is what I mostly have & am satisfied with. All they want to do is a tearoff & installation of vinyl siding.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 11:03:05
For God sakes grow a set and tell them what you want.
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-04-01 11:22:31
The Pimp knows everything. Haven’t you guys been paying attention?
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 11:25:50
We just happen to earn alot of money in the contruction biz. ALOT of money.
You? You pretend to know something about construction in order to make yourself and your housing junkie friends feel better about paying massively inflated prices. In the end, you’re suckers.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 11:46:17
… and yet you whine about replacement alternators for honda civics, which can easily be had for about $100
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 11:49:41
And this isn’t about you pretending to be an auto mechanic either my Harpsichordist friend.
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-04-01 11:50:51
Quazite boxes are those boxes in your easements that electric utilities are buried in. Most contractors aren’t burying utilities and telco as part of their jobs; actual utility companies or specialized utility contractors do that in most parts of the country.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 12:06:33
QZ’s are used for alot of things…. swimming pool pumps, site lighting, in lieu of valve boxes for sprinkler systems… so yes…. most contractors are burying utilities.
Did you price a QZ at Cheapo? It’s triple the price of a supply house. Did you get the turnaround time on it from Cheapo? 2 weeks. That’s 2 weeks longer than a supply house.
Contractors don’t frequent Cheapo
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 12:25:30
I have some patching & panel revision to do, but … all they want to do is a tearoff & installation of vinyl siding.
And that’s the crux of the issue, and it’s also why you see so many homeowners in Home Despot. It’s all about patching, repairing, switching out fixtures or moulding or plumbing, and landscaping or re-landscaping existing houses in the pre-1980 inner suburbs with decent commutes.
Big contractors aren’t interested in saving what’s still good. All they can do is rip down and/or start from scratch. So, enter the small outfits, handymen, and individual homeowners who do things themselves. Why is this a bad thing? Is it really so bad to be clueless? You have to start somewhere.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 12:36:44
And this is why the residual value of a 20+ year old house is near zero.
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-04-01 12:59:38
Seems like a huge waste of money to use those boxes to bury $50 sprinkler system parts when a $15 plastic box will do equally well but I guess you are trying to make some kind of a point. Lawn mowers can be heavy I guess…
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 14:45:11
I think it’s you that’s attempting to make a point. You’re not doing a very good job of it.
—Tell us about Lucky Ducky call center jobs in Sacramento….—-
“Sacramento ranks among fastest-growing cities for tech jobs …”
“When thinking of tech hubs, Silicon Valley, San Francisco or Seattle all spring to mind. It’s unlikely that many people think that places like Sacramento, Houston or Kansas City are tech-oriented, but a new report suggests the fastest-growing cities for tech jobs may be in those places, and not just in well-known industry centers……”
Buy two condos. And hurry! They’re not making any more land. And interest rates are at historic lows. And real estate always goes up. And 1,000 people a day are moving to Florida, Atlanta, the Sacramento suburbs, Queen Creek AZ, et cetera. HURRY!
Sacramento is a hot hot hot market. Not much land out there, very educated work force, lots of 6 figure jobs. BUY BUY BUY.
Also, CA is always going to be able to subsidize real estate via its locked-in property taxes. And the state isn’t having any budget problems, so buy buy buy. Stockton was an anomaly, most CA counties and towns are fiscally responsible.
’twas sarcasm directed at the NARscum shills on this blog.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 08:38:20
Everybody knows Sacramento is HOT, but if you had to pick between Modesto or Fresno, where would you choose? Everybody wants to live in Modesto or Fresno (or Bakersfield, too). Pack up the U-Haul today! And HURRY!
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 09:01:42
Hmmm… AAPL is going to locate a server farm in Fresno so that’s tempting, definitely going to be thousands of good long term jobs from that. On the other hand, Amazon is going to open a warehouse in Bakersfield. Oh, and there’s a Wells Fargo call center coming soon to SacTown.
So many touch choices.
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-04-01 09:44:20
Bakersfield, Stockton, Fresno.
Who knew that CA had THREE armpits?
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 09:58:10
I forgot Modesto and Chico.
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 10:06:33
Pack up the U-Haul today!
An oldie but goodie! Ah, the memories! Imagine you’re some middle manager tiring of your flyover life and just want to junk it all and strike it rich in RE:
17′ U-Haul from Indianapolis to Bakersfield: $1301
17′ U-Haul from Bakersfield to Indianapolis: $2699
Comment by Raimund Dippon
2013-04-01 10:13:58
living in the Sac area I find this thread hilarious…
A day after former Cypriot President Vassilou was found to be among many elite Cypriot (politicians and businessmen) who had loans written-off by the major (now insolvent) banks; it appears the rot is far fouler than expected. In a somewhat stunning (or purely coincidental) revelation, ENETEnglish reports that Cypriot newspaper Haravgi claims that current President Nicos Anastasiades’ family businesses transferred ‘dozens of millions’ from their Laiki Bank accounts to London just a week before the devastating depositor haircuts were unleashed upon his people. Of course, the denials are loud and Anastasiades has demanded an investigation into the claims; we are sure the government-selected ‘independent’ committee will be as thorough as the Libor anti-trust investigators. As a reminder, as we noted yesterday, here are Cyprus’ gun control laws.
…
Yep—there’s nothing like a crisis to aid in pretending to help the people, while actually shearing the sheeple.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 10:06:46
Also, it is another example of the billionaires eating the millionaires. When Obama talks about millionaires and billionaires it is absurd to lump them into the same category. Instead of going after billionaires that are the real beneficiaries of globalization, countries are destroying millionaires which are the small business people that actually employ people within their countries.
Comment by ecofeco
2013-04-01 14:32:23
<”Yep—there’s nothing like a crisis to aid in pretending to help the people, while actually shearing the sheeple.”</I.
It’s even better when you manufacture the crisis!
Comment by Dale
2013-04-01 15:37:09
“millionaires and billionaires it is absurd to lump them into the same category”
Yup. Like lumping thousandaires and millionaires together.
Some people believe that by imposing losses on investors and reducing the Cyprus banking system liabilities, the European powers have addressed the problems in Cyprus (if harshly). Others think that it was just an unjust tax on depositors. I have written about the sequence of events. Cyprus banks borrowed money and bought Greek government bonds. Greece defaulted, imposing big losses on bondholders. Cyprus banks postponed marking down their losses. Now, they have to mark those losses and admit that they are insolvent. This triggered a run on the banks. Now, finally, shareholders, bondholders, and depositors are taking their losses. The government of Cyprus and the “Troika” did not provide enough money to pay everyone.
Within Cyprus, there is now uncertainty about remaining deposits, capital controls, and the solvency of the Cyprus government itself. Elsewhere, the focus turns to other countries (e.g. Slovenia) where markets are becoming jittery that the same thing could happen.
…
People probably still don’t believe me, but this is why I think 401k’s and IRA’s are risky if your retirement horizon is more than 20 years. They’re a huge pool of potential revenue for the government. People say “well the government would never do that”. Haha, prior to 2008 I never thought our government would have such a ridiculous TARP plan. Prior to 2013 I never thought the EU/IMF would force bank depositors to take haircuts as a prerequisite to a bail out.
At a minimum we’re going to have some kind of means testing. Any decent sized IRA/401k will be vulnerable. And decent probably means a small amount, maybe 50k-100k.
Look at the depositors in Cyprus. 100k euros is a looooong way from being wealthy. But those people have to pay for the casino-like kleptocracy that is the .01%.
It is still a good idea for the complex paranoid to keep a reasonable 401K account active. They won’t take what they can’t find, but why make it obvious that there is anything to look for…..
I do a 401k up to the extent there is an employer match. That’s a 100% return on the money, so even if the gov’t takes a big chunk I come out OK.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-04-01 07:56:32
Later on in life, you can contribute the max to get the match and then disburse the original contribution back to yourself. That’s a pretty good return too.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 09:29:35
When your only tax shelter as a wage slave is a 401k, you max it out regardless of match.
We’re not allow entry into the lucrative tax shelters.
I thought that the Cyprus haircut was voted down, wasn’t it? What was appalling was the very suggestion of it.
It was ‘voted down’ in that it was removed for the first 100,000 euros in an account. For accounts higher than that, it was increased, with some estimates saying it will be as high as 60%.
The rumor is the big rich got their money out with their crony-connections, but local businesses and retirees are screwed.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-04-01 08:34:53
The bankster is not your friend.
Comment by bunga bunga
2013-04-01 09:57:57
rumor
Yup. It’s all a rumor. Nothing to see…your money is safe…..
The rumor is the big rich got their money out with their crony-connections
Before the rumor, there would have been an entirely reasonable assumption that cronies would have gotten the word well ahead of time & acted to save themselves, an assumption based on history & knowledge of human nature.
People say “well the government would never do that”.
1933
Gold
You left out “every bank in the entire country was closed”
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2013-04-01 13:09:55
Why didn’t the people use thier guns?
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 13:40:42
If Jesus shot anyone it would be the money changers. The only act of violence by him in the Gospels was directed at them by over turning their tables at the Temple and driving them off with a whip if I remember correctly. I say the banksters are the modern day money changers.
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 13:50:50
Great link concerning the temple and money changers:
Given the number of private pension plans that are going away and being replaced by 401k type plans, I find it very hard to believe that they are going to raid them. They will be just as difficult to raid as public pensions are today.
I think we’ll see a VAT first–an indirect way to raid retirees.
LIMASSOL, Cyprus—A multicolored stack of shipping containers stuffed with goods intended for Cypriot stores towered over this island nation’s largest seaport—a monument to the country’s financial paralysis.
In normal times, thousands of tons of cargo speed through the sprawling complex here every week, feeding Cyprus’s import-hungry economy. But with the country’s banking system on life support, the cargo network has shuddered to a halt.
“This is the artery of the economy and now nothing can move through here because no one’s sure they’ll get paid,” dockworker Marios Theodosiou said, as a huge crane moved another steel container into the holding area.
Many suppliers, wary of accepting letters of credit from Cyprus’s troubled banks, which reopened for business on Thursday after being closed for nearly two weeks, have refused to release the containers for anything but cash. The result: Some goods are starting to disappear from shop shelves.
Cash-starved businesses across Cyprus are counting the costs of the prolonged bank shutdown and of new capital controls aimed at keeping funds in the country. Unable to pay suppliers, many stores have opted to close until things improve. While banks reopened—allowing cash to return to the economy from depositors who can withdraw up to €300 ($390) per day—it isn’t clear how long it will take before funds and credit again flow freely through Cyprus’s banks.
With perishable goods such as fruit and vegetables running low, some Cypriots have begun to stockpile essentials, such as baby formula, tinned food and olive oil. Almost everyone is trying to hoard cash.
“The market right now is a time bomb ready to explode,” said Stefanos Koursaris, head of the Cyprus Small Business Confederation. The full costs, he said, will become apparent only in the days and weeks ahead. “Then businessmen will realize how big their losses are.”
…
The U.S. economy is in a bubble inflated by “phony money” from the Federal Reserve and will burst within a few years, warned David Stockman, who was budget director for President Ronald Reagan.
In an essay published yesterday in the New York Times (NYT), Stockman wrote that the Fed’s quantitative easing policies in the aftermath of the credit crisis have flooded stock markets with cash even while the “Main Street economy” remains weak. The combination, he wrote, is “unsustainable.”
“When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008,” wrote Stockman, a former senior managing director at Blackstone Group LP (BX) and a former Republican congressman from Michigan. “Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today’s feeble remnants of economic growth.”
…
The wingnut of the day award is easy to pick, it’s David Stockman:
Cranky Old Men, by Paul Krugman: … Actually, I was disappointed in Stockman’s piece. I thought there would be some kind of real argument, some presentation, however tendentious, of evidence. Instead it’s just a series of gee-whiz, context- and model-free numbers embedded in a rant — and not even an interesting rant. It’s cranky old man stuff, the kind of thing you get from people who read Investors Business Daily, listen to Rush Limbaugh, and maybe, if they’re unusually teched up, get investment advice from Zero Hedge. Sad.
David Stockman Goes Way, Way Over the Top, by Jared Bernstein: He has a featured piece in today’s NYT which, while about 11.8% absolutely and totally on target, is mostly a horrific screed, an ahistorical, dystopic, Hunger-Games vision of America based on debt obsession and willful ignorance of macroeconomics and the impact of market failure. …
David Stockman wants to pee in your cornflakes, Kids Prefer Cheese: Wow. David Stockman confuses cause and effect, goes all gold-buggy, slanders Milton Friedman, and just generally comes unhinged in a massive hissy fit in today’s NYT. …
Update: See also David Henderson’s “David Stockman Screeches.”
Posted by Mark Thoma on Sunday, March 31, 2013 at 11:33 AM in Economics,
cranky old man stuff, the kind of thing you get from people who read Investors Business Daily, listen to Rush Limbaugh, and maybe, if they’re unusually teched up, get investment advice from Zero Hedge.
Tyler Durden isn’t edgy anymore? But he’s on the internets!
Correct, Stockman is a hack. Krugman is a brilliant academic but should not be taken as a final authority on political/policy decisions.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 09:20:57
Brilliant academics have a long history of making spectacularly wrong predictions about what will happen in the real world.
Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.
– Irving Fisher (1929)
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 10:04:06
Brilliant academics have a long history of making spectacularly wrong predictions about what will happen in the real world. YOU CAN SAY THAT AGAIN.
28 March 2007: “At this juncture . . . the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime markets seems likely to be contained,” Ben Bernanke said in prepared testimony to Congress’ Joint Economic Committee.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 10:07:26
Their arguments are still worth listening to, because it can cause you to revise your own ways of thinking. Few people would really want to live in what the left or right consider a “utopia”. Moreover it is not practical. The point stands that Krugman has a Nobel for a reason and this is nearly entirely separate from whether we should adopt his recommendations into policy. Saying he is wrong about “everything” would be spectacularly ridiculous. Much of Krugman’s academic work is now widely accepted across the spectrum when it comes to international trade, much like academics accept much of the work of Milton F, John M. Keynes, etc. It doesn’t mean they want it as policy. And, FWIW, we’ve never really adopted *any* of these folk’s pure ideas into policy. It would’ve actually been an amazingly good thing if Greenspan had pulled his head out of his Ayn Rand-stuff ass and raised interest rates when the economy was strong to slow down the buildup of credit/leverage. It wouldn’t been amazing if Congress had paid down the debt/balanced the budget rather than have Medicare Part D. But when people talk about Keynesianism being disproven, they have no f’ing idea what they’re talking about.
The only position I’m taking is that to your average voter, these academics mean nothing beyond what the cable news show shorthand says. We shouldn’t “follow” Keynes or Krugman but we also shouldn’t “follow” Adam Smith or Ayn Rand, etc. We should realize the underlying assumptions they make and the limitations of their writing for our real world situations.
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 10:22:06
We should realize the underlying assumptions they make and the limitations of their writing for our real world situations.
The electorate should work to understand its real world situation. This is not currently the case & doesn’t seem likely to happen. Meanwhile, on with the show!
‘when people talk about Keynesianism being disproven, they have no f’ing idea what they’re talking about’
Well, we’ve had lots of deficit spending the last few years and unemployment hardly budged.
‘the limitations of their writing for our real world situations’
It’s hard to “disprove” ideas like fake space alien invasions and digging ditches and filling them back in, because it’s so dumb nobody will ever try it.
“Their arguments are still worth listening to, because it can cause you to revise your own ways of thinking.”
Listening to these highly-touted academicians blather on about the real world as though they own a crystal ball which can accurately predict the future or have policy levers to pull which can make their fantasies come true has led me to drastically revise downward the faith I put in their statements.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 11:54:57
We haven’t tried Keynesianism because we did not pay down debt, run a surplus, raise interest rates, or control credit when the economy was good. Instead, we aimed for even lower levels of unemployment by continuing to juice the market. We were at unemployment levels that were too low.
We also placed far too little emphasis on education and young people, continuing to confer benefits to the older generations in terms of Med. Part D, juiced up pensions, and lower taxes on capital gains. So basically we spent money that should’ve been used to bolster our future and instead plowed it into nearly-retired or fully-retired people. Very ineffective.
We really did not. We also did not have enough productive infrastructure spending in ‘08-’09 because we were fighting no one but TWO idiotic decade-long wars.
And again, I’m not saying we should adopt any policy wholesale. But it’s a lie to say we tried Keynes’ ideas. We *barely* tried deficit spending, but as noted above it was very limited in its effectiveness because the economy was already running on deficit spending, much of which was directed at unproductive things like transfer payments to old people and nation-building/wars in other countries. Idiotic.
‘We also did not have enough productive infrastructure spending in ‘08-’09 because we were fighting no one but TWO idiotic decade-long wars’
No, no. To Keynes, war is good. Remember how WW2 got us out of the great depression? It wasn’t true, but that’s what they say. And this is why Krugman thinks a fake space alien invasion would do the trick today; we would borrow and spend like crazy to keep Marvin the Martian from shooting down the Blue Angels.
‘We haven’t tried Keynesianism because…it was very limited in its effectiveness because…’
If a theory can’t be put into practice, what good is it?
Comment by tj
2013-04-01 12:22:50
If a theory can’t be put into practice, what good is it?
yes, but it’s even worse than that. it’s true it can’t be put into practice because no one can accurately predict up turns and down turn or how long they will last. so it simply can’t ever be done.
the second point is that, even if it could be done it would be detrimental to the economy. money that’s taken out of the economy to accomplish some type of keynesian demand management (public works), will never been used in more productive businesses that are guided by market oriented capital allocation. (the money gets spent in the wrong places)
in short, it’s a disastrous idea from beginning to end.
I haven’t read the Stockman rant or any of the responses yet. I saw that Mark Thoma had collected some responses in one of his top posts and thought that it was worth providing the links. And, in case none of you have noticed, Stockman is plugging a new book, so anything he puts out there that looks like it might be intended to get a lot of free publicity? It is.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by snowgirl
2013-04-01 09:13:01
Stockman’s been saying these things for years. Youtube is full of his rants. He’s just getting around to the book circuit.
And from the early 2000’s through 2008 while the bubble expanded we were told that there was no bubble and we didn’t have any facts.All one has to do for a dose of reality is look at the number of people out of work and the wages of those working vs. the cost of necessary goods including rent or mortgage.
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 09:12:03
Notice how Krugman starts off with an ad hominem attack, instead of sticking to principles in his critique? The subtext of the message is “Stockman is not in my club; therefore he can’t possibly be right.”
The mess did not start until we started to believe that forcing interest rates down with the unlimited printing of money was good policy. Greenspan started to do that during the Clinton administration, he was reasonably tight before that. So tight that he actually caused Bush I to lose. Now, we do not want to do without our bubbles.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-04-01 10:39:31
Greenspan started to do that during the Clinton administration,
LOL. Try to keep it straight, even if it causes cognitive dissonance:
Volcker was appointed by Carter.
Reagan fired Volcker, and replaced him with Greenspan.
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 11:33:32
Alpha try reading the post. Greenspan did not start his easy money routine until Clinton and was reappointed for it. I never said he was first appointed under Clinton.
And Greenspan “supplied liquidity to the markets” the day after Black Monday, initiating the policy that has been known ever since as the Greenspan Put.
P.S. I disagree with Investopedia dating the term to the 1998 LTCM bailout, as the policy was in force already in 1987.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-04-01 11:46:42
Oops- sorry Dan. Guess it was my own cognitive dissonance there;)
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 11:56:02
There is a big difference between adding liquidity for a few days and following policies that keep interest rates below inflation for a protracted period of time. That did not begin until after Bush I left office. Also, Reagan was out of office by 1989 and Greenspan was not appointed to 1987, the Reagan recovery had nothing to do with Greenspan. Reagan inherited an economy with high inflation, interest rates and unemployment and they were all fixed by 1987. It is not his fault that others did not alter policies that needed to be altered to address different problems. Obama inherited an economy with too much debt and has added to it. Had he passed a version of Simpson/Bowles and put us on a path to a balanced budget, I would not have a problem with a 2% growth economy. The next president gets a problem bigger than he inherited. The economy had stabilized by the Summer of 2009 before any of his policies had even gone into effect in any meaningful way.
(Reuters) - The big milestone this week is not the 25th anniversary of the Black Monday crash but falls a day later when we mark the far darker advent of the Greenspan put.
The Greenspan put, the now long-established policy of easing and appeasing when markets go cold, arguably created the world in which we live - one of low growth, bubbles and, every once in a while, huge busts.
On Monday, October 19, 1987, the U.S. stock market crashed, along with falls in Asia and Europe, culminating in a 22 percent tumble in the Dow.
The exact causes are still in dispute, but currency tensions played a role, as did proposed legislation to take away some of the tax advantages of high-yield merger financings.
Margin calls, as ever, exacerbated falls, as did a then-new phenomenon, the program trade, which helped to drive volumes to then stratospheric levels and gave rise to a feeling that the machines had taken over.
Into the breach stepped Alan Greenspan, just months into an 18-year tenure as chairman of the Federal Reserve. Early the following Tuesday, the Fed came out with a statement, one which will seem very familiar to those who participated in the other crashes, panics and simple malaises which have been the defining financial feature of the past 25 years:
“The Federal Reserve, consistent with its responsibilities as the nation’s central bank, affirmed today its readiness to serve as a source of liquidity to support the economic and financial system.”
…
Stockman’s analysis skewers Keynesian spenders and GOP tax-cutters alike, showing how they converged to bloat the welfare state, perpetuate the military-industrial complex, and deplete the revenue base—even as the Fed’s massive money printing allowed politicians to enjoy “deficits without tears.” But these policies have also fueled new financial bubbles and favored Wall Street with cheap money and rigged stock and bond markets, while crushing Main Street savers and punishing family budgets with soaring food and energy costs. The Great Deformation explains how we got here and why these warped, crony capitalist policies are an epochal threat to free market prosperity and American political democracy.
How does he know that there will be no more bailouts? Does he have inside info, or maybe he knows/believes that Dodd-Frank will prevent a bailout.
Zero-sum austerity is not going to work…. not when the Big Boyz ran up trillions of *poof* money on the global credit card by jacking off with credit-default swaps and microsecond trading. Austerity might be able to manage debt backed by physical assets, but J6P doesn’t have enough assets — and can’t create assets (labor) fast enough — to offset all this *poof* sh!t.
Stockman raises a legitimate question, unfortunate Stockman is also a hack. So it’s a difficult situation where you can’t rely on Stockman alone. I’m not saying he’s wrong, but rather that he’s not the best messenger for this message.
So Neuro, when you are thinking about the side effects coming to the forefront, how long do you think we have?
My gut tells me that we have 2-4 years…maybe, before we see higher rates (inflation and interest). I don’t think we will see decades of low rates (like in Japan).
Much less than that actually, the Civic averaged 38.6 miles per gallon there and back yesterday.
Getting back from any of the resorts west of the tunnel (Breck, Keystone, Copper Mtn, Vail, Beaver Creek) usually means sitting in 1+ hour of stop and go traffic just to get to the tunnel. That burns ALOT of gas, and is just No Fun at all.
I’ve only ever skiied places with lifts; do you just hike to the top of a peak and ski down? I feel so sheltered by comparison. Plus we only have girly-man mountains on this coast.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 07:45:12
Loveland ski area sits on top of the Eisenhower/Johnson Interstate 70 tunnel, and sat there years before the tunnels existed. The high chairlift goes all the way to the ridge, and from there you can traverse (or ride the snowcat when it’s running) to drop into the basin from points along the ridge.
Our experience with backcountry skiing is limited as of now. And the gear for it gets expensive (you will spend ALOT of money), because in addition to skis you need an avalanche beacon. Add up all of the costs associated with this sport/hobby and theyar are Incalculable.
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-04-01 08:20:37
Hey goon, check this out: backcountry.com now has the ABS Avalanche Rescue Kit on sale for only $755.44! At that price you can snap up two of them. Buy now or be priced out forever.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 08:29:15
Hmmm I think I will stick to the comfortable, if boring, confines of ski resorts.
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 10:36:36
After a few more decades of climate change, there won’t be any skiing in the East any more.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 11:59:09
I probably only half a little over 2 decades left to ski, having a broken hip at 50+ does not sound like a good deal. I’ve taken some bad wipe outs over the years, a 50+ version of myself would probably be laid up for weeks.
Even though we have wimpy girlyman mountains in the east, bc of the warmer temps you mention, it is often icy at night on the slopes. Much less powder than you guys have out west. Alot [sic] less.
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 13:22:40
After a few more decades of climate change, there won’t be any skiing in the East any more.
If we have a few decades with no sunspots, you will need cross country skies just to get around town during the Winter. If we are the end of the interglacial warming period that will soon be year around.
Nice pictures Goon. Joe, I am skiing every week at 70 and have a 66 year old racing instructor. Oldest racing team member is 93 with one at 91 ! Another instructor at 77.
I was waiting behind this guy who was talking to his friend about where they stayed when skiing Whistler. My friend and I guessed they each were about 55. They were 89 !
Goon, there are two things I would like to have. The ability to ski your western powder and the stamina to be able to do it.
The Dow Jones and Standard & Poor’s 500 indexes reached record highs on Thursday, having completely erased the losses since the stock market’s last peak, in 2007. But instead of cheering, we should be very afraid.
Over the last 13 years, the stock market has twice crashed and touched off a recession: American households lost $5 trillion in the 2000 dot-com bust and more than $7 trillion in the 2007 housing crash. Sooner or later — within a few years, I predict — this latest Wall Street bubble, inflated by an egregious flood of phony money from the Federal Reserve rather than real economic gains, will explode, too.
…
Amid the weekly up and down reports on Vancouver’s housing market is one constant: a regular blog feature called “Absurd Vancouver Property” that highlights the city’s ridiculous property prices.
Melissa Carr aptly calls the section “Are you f*%#ing kidding me?” on her blog, the thirties grind.
Starting in March 2012, Carr finds eyesores, teardowns and just plain dumpy houses often selling for $1 million and up in Vancouver.
The reality is more astonishing when Carr compares what $1.7 million can buy — for example, this 2,700 sq.-ft., three-bedroom, five-bath Hollywood Hills home originally built for Charlie Chaplin and owned by Robert Downey Jr. …
…
“Why buy in Vancouver when you can buy in Hollywood Hills for the same price and live in sunny Southern California instead of frigid Canada?”
Because they’re idiots. The folks buying in Canada at 500/sq/ft make the morons down in FL standing in line for days to buy a pre-con condo look like Einstein.
Frigid. No. But way too much rain! We spent our honeymoon up in that area last year, and, while we had a great time, it was truly a workout for our GoreTex!
Florida isn’t frigid either, and it’s 1/5th the cost.
Cause the need to own and nest is irrational? A few weeks ago SFHomeowner said one of her reasons to buy was not to have her life “on hold” any more. Did not have time to reply that day but what do you mean? I can see if you were in a place temporarily for work (I am and I don’t want to put too much efforts into putting down roots.) But since San Fran. will remain your home what difference does renting vs. owning make.
But since San Fran. will remain your home what difference does renting vs. owning make.
The cost of rent has gone up so much in the past 20 years that most people I know who have lost their apartments (usually owner-occupied move in when the place gets sold or they had kids and needed more than a studio or one bedroom anymore) have had to leave the city entirely.
A 2-bedroom in a decent neighborhood easily runs $2500 per month. Our PITI is less than that.
Our rental of 13 years was not rent controlled (single family homes are not covered). When our landlord raised our rent $200 month on December 24th and sent us a letter that we had to get rid of our chickens (she had happily accepted free eggs for the previous 4 years) and insisted we clean our garage coupled with crazy, drop-in “inspections” we decided that almost 30 years of renting was enough for us.
Had we been in a nice, rent controlled flat with a yard, we probably would have kept renting.
We’re five years post crash w/no adjustment in sight. Or are you that certain this can’t be dragged out another decade? You do realize her house could be paid off before you even start looking, right? When her payments are taxes/maintenance only, yeah, she will look smarter than the renter.
Sorry, but I’m convinced these decisions are not one size fits all.
Owning can reduce uncertainty. As long as you can make the payments (including the taxes), you can continue to live in the same place - assuming a landslide or tornado or earthquake or eminent domain does not take out your residence.
When renting, you have the added uncertainty of the landlord selling or being foreclosed on. The acts of nature or government are still risks when renting.
Yes. Do you understand that some of us don’t expect the financial results of the last 20 years to be duplicated in the next 20 years? Until the Fed stepped in I was almost certain of severe deflation. Now I don’t know what’s going to happen, but it’s still possible.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2013-04-01 14:36:21
I see every decade I’ve been alive repeated.
Boom. Bust. Less jobs and less jobs that pay well. Blame the poor.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 15:10:34
Carl, do you mean you’re not counting on house prices going up? Well, neither am I. But what I don’t get is that nobody here seems to acknowledge the value of a paid-off house regardless of the economy. The house has value even if the price stays at what I paid for it. And for someone like me, who will have no kids to move in with and annoy, when I can no longer work, the house will have value even if the price goes to 0! Sure, the house itself will deteriorate; we’ve all seen houses where seniors aged in place. But it’s a roof over my head.
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-04-01 15:54:51
Yes…but what if we get deflation to the point that your income goes down significantly well before it’s paid off? That’s what I’ve been expecting…
If you can pay cash for your house then we’re in total agreement.
Goon - good farmland isn’t.. It’s about 8k an acre in the Iowa-missouri region (up from about 5k/acre recently) and you can actually produce on it. Don’t forget that that is real estate also…
Land generally appreciates with either the rate of general inflation or, in odd situations, the value of the crop that can be grown on it. Land in rural areas has almost no value except for what it can produce for crop, which, 5-10K/acre is pretty reasonable. Land in urban areas no longer has any tie to crop value; however, it should, in general, mirror inflation.
There are broad exceptions to this, of course. However, in general, land does not depreciate (in the general sense of the word, however that’s not the same as “does not lose value”) and should, over time, appreciate about in line with inflation. Houses depreciate over time and require continual upkeep to maintain their value, land typically does not.
If you want to speculate in “real estate” land is, IMHO, the place you should do it. Much less expensive, and, if you happen to find the right spots, the returns can be breathtaking. Speculating with fully constructed houses is a game for bored housewives and husbands (real estate agents), not a game that the major investment money plays (although, recently, that no longer seems to be the case, but, IMHO, this is a temporary dislocation).
Rural land can also be a hedge against economic disaster. My grandfather became a full time farmer during the Depression.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 15:15:43
Ditto for my grandparents. The story is that they had some business which went under, so they traded their last dime for a farmhouse and acreage and lived off the crops and livestock. You can live nearly cashless, which is a good way to live during a Depression. As they said, they couldn’t buy much, but they ate well.
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 04:35:51
RBC’s annual home ownership poll showed just 15 per cent of Canadians say they are likely to buy in the next two years, down from 27 per cent last year.
The right comparison here is percentage change:
(15/27-1)*100% = -44.4% year-on-year decline in percent of Canadians who say they are likely to buy a home in the next two years. In plain English, this is a collapse in the number of prospective buyers.
A majority of Canadians are taking a wait-and-see approach when it comes to home purchases and plans to buy have suffered the steepest year-over-year drop in two decades, thanks to Ottawa’s move to tighten mortgage rules last summer, says a poll released on Tuesday by the Royal Bank of Canada.
RBC’s annual home ownership poll showed just 15 per cent of Canadians say they are likely to buy in the next two years, down from 27 per cent last year. The 12-percentage-point drop is the biggest year-over-year fall in overall buying intention as tracked by the poll, which has been conducted annually for the past 20 years.
“The more cautious mood this year is not surprising and is consistent with broader economic and industry forecasts,” Sean Amato-Gauci, senior vice-president, home equity financing at RBC, said in a statement.
An unseasonably warm spring, ultra-low rates and anticipation of mortgage rule changes may have led many Canadians to buy homes in the first half of 2012, said Amato-Gauci.
Last summer, the federal government implemented tighter mortgage rules — the fourth move in as many years — to calm the once-hot real estate market and limit the record levels of debt Canadians have accumulated in recent years.
Data earlier this month showed that home sales in Canada fell in February and the rate at which people amassed household debt slowed in the fourth quarter, adding to the pile of evidence that the stricter rules are filtering through.
Overall, 75 per cent of Canadians say that Ottawa’s move last summer will impact or delay prospective homebuyers from getting into the market.
At the same time, however, the poll showed nearly six-in-10 recent and prospective homebuyers say that a shortened mortgage amortization period to 25 years from 30 years had little to no impact.
Affordability is a key barrier
Despite the caution, 84 per cent believe that a house or condominium is a good investment.
…
Yeah, the newer vinyl-sided POSs in the exurbs have little intrinsic value.
I would never recommend buying any house built in the last ~30 years, unless it was custom-built by a reliable builder (which you’ll only see in very rich areas). And even then, I wouldn’t buy one in the exurbs.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 09:40:46
“Yeah, the newer vinyl-sided POSs in the exurbs have little intrinsic value.”
And houses older than that have none.
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 10:34:20
And houses older than that have none.
And here I am paying over $2000 a year in taxes on something with no value.
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 10:40:24
Can you report on ZIP 44223, specifically the area of the Falls around State Rd and Broad Blvd?
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 11:04:23
“And here I am paying over $2000 a year in taxes on something with no value.”
You have plenty of company.
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 11:25:25
It’s a big crater.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 11:28:38
…. and growing ever deeper.
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 13:50:52
Would there be any big money to be made in urban / suburban home demolition? There seems to be a crying need for this.
I would never buy a house with vinyl or aluminum siding. Just shows a lack of taste. Quality is much more important than quantity and some shitbox in the ‘burbs with artificial siding is about as tacky as it gets.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 12:04:43
I would never buy a house with vinyl or aluminum siding. Just shows a lack of taste.
Extravagant and unnecessary spending also shows a lack of taste. Ceterum de gustibus non est disputandum.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 12:21:03
Vinyl, aluminum, clapboard, shakes, sandwich panels…. Houses depreciate rapidly no matter what it’s wrapped in.
And with 20 million excess empty houses with another 35 MILLION coming on the market as boomers head to the grave, it’s a long way to the bottom for housing. A very long way.
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-04-01 12:47:01
I would never buy a house with vinyl or aluminum siding. Just shows a lack of taste.
I’m imagining a harpsichord covered with it :-).
Comment by oxide
2013-04-01 12:54:37
Well then, Joe, I am not good enough for you.
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 15:32:38
Don’t feel bad Oxide none of us are. Joe, my house is stucco so you should have a lot of fun with that. I also bought some bags of mulch for my backyard at HD since it is the store is near to my house. I just have Desert Willow trees and wild flowers and use red colored mulch to provide ground cover for the rest of the area. I think it looks nice and I use very little water, it adsorbs the monsoon rains without erosion and avoids blowing sand and soil during the wind storms. But I am sure you can find fault Joe, tell me how hillbilly I am.
So, is total U.S. debt going up again? Or have the highly paid geniuses at the top found some other source of demand that doesn’t involve them taking less of the pie?
Are markets really headed for the mother-of-all crashes?
So says David Stockman, ex-budget director for President Ronald Reagan. In a gone-viral op/ed piece for the New York Times on Sunday, the former Republican congressman from Michigan predicts that crash is a few years away and points the finger at easy Fed money flooding Wall Street and the weakening of the gold standard.
Stockman is the author of “The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America,” which is hitting the shelves April 2. The book tells how we have eroded from free-market economy into a managed one that operates for the benefit of a privileged few.
Stockman ends the four-screener NYT piece (at least from a PC), “Sundown in America,” with this cheery quote:
When the latest bubble pops, there will be nothing to stop the collapse. If this sounds like advice to get out of the markets and hide out in cash, it is.
Bloomberg: “The U.S. economy is in a bubble inflated by “Phony Money” from the Federal Reserve and will burst within a few years, warned David Stockman, who was budget director for President Ronald Reagan … Stockman wrote that the Fed’s quantitative easing policies in the aftermath of the credit crisis have flooded stock markets with cash even while the “Main Street economy” remains weak. the combination, he wrote, is “unsustainable.”
“When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008,” wrote Stockman … “Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today’s feeble remnants of economic growth.”
Mainland shares of property developers closed sharply higher on Monday despite the announcement over the weekend that Beijing and Shanghai will enforce the property curbs announced in early March.
The Chinese government has been trying to cool its red-hot property market and has called for stricter enforcement of a 20 percent capital gains tax on home sale profits and asked cities with fast property price increases to raise the down payment requirement and mortgage rates on second homes.
Michael Klibaner, head of research Greater China at Jones Lang LaSalle said property stocks are staging a relief rally, because the measures were not surprising.
On Monday, Shanghai-listed shares of major real estate counters were up over 2 percent with China Merchants Property Development gaining almost 5 percent, outperforming the benchmark that closed down 0.1 percent. Hong Kong markets were shut for a holiday.
…
FILE- In this Tuesday, March 26, 2013 file photo, employees of the Bank of Cyprus shout slogans as they holds banners reading in Greek “shame” during a protest at Cyprus central bank in Nicosia, Cyprus. The moment word broke that Cypriot lawmakers in Parliament had voted down a bailout deal that would have raided everyone’s savings to prop up a collapsing banking sector, a huge cheer rose up from hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside that echoed through the building’s corridors. Many relished it as a kind of David-against-Goliath moment a country of barely a million people standing up to the will of Europe’s behemoths who wanted it to swallow a very bitter pill to fix its broken-down economy. (AP Photo/Petros Karadjias, File) (A2013)
Customers of an Italian bank have seen deposits fall by “a few billion euros” after a scandal in February, the bank announced Saturday.
According to Reuters, Monte dei Paschi bank reported a yearly loss of 3.2 billion euros ($4.1 billion) – a higher-than-expected net loss for 2012 – after loss-making derivatives trades at the lender amounting to 730 million euros. Bad loans also contributed to the loss.
The bank’s chief financial officer said after the earnings were released on Thursday that it was “quick in recovering ground in March” on the lost deposits in February.
The figures highlight the scale of the problems at Italy’s third-biggest lender, which received a 4 billion euro ($5.1 billion) state bailout last month, according to Reuters.
The news of Monte dei Paschi comes as a deal to rescue Cyprus banks from financial collapse has renewed fears about Europe’s shaky financial system.
…
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 04:41:50
Slovenia cuts growth forecast as bail-out fears grow
Fears that Slovenia will become the next eurozone nation to need a bail-out have been fuelled by a sharp cut to the country’s growth forecasts by the government’s economic institute.
Slovenia has become the first victim of contagion from Cyprus as its borrowing costs rocketed last week in the wake of a punishing bail-out deal. Photo: ALAMY
By Denise Roland
9:00PM BST 31 Mar 2013
Slovenian GDP is set for a deeper-than-expected 1.9pc contraction this year, compared with an earlier estimate of 1.4pc, according to official forecasts released on Friday.
Estimates of the recession-gripped country return to growth in 2014 were also slashed to 0.2pc, down from earlier predictions of 0.9pc.
The revised forecast brings government predictions in line with the IMF’s gloomier verdict that that the economy will shrink 2pc this year, the most in the European Union after Greece and Cyprus.
“Along with the worsening economic situation in the international environment, key elements for the decline will be the state’s continued fiscal consolidation and the rebuilding of the banking system,” said Bostjan Vasle, the institute’s director.
…
Spain built 675,000 homes a year from 1997 to 2006, according to a report by a unit of Spanish savings bank Cajamar. That’s more than France, Germany and the U.K. combined. The frenzy resulted in a surplus of about 2 million empty homes that will take between seven and 13 years to absorb, according to Madrid-based property research firm R.R. de Acuna & Asociados.
The Development Ministry estimates there are around 700,000 new unsold homes in Spain and more than half of those are in coastal areas. The total number of empty homes in Spain is 3 million, according to a spokeswoman for the government who asked not to be identified by name.
Left, a statue of the parents of Francisco el Pocero, the builder of the Residencial Francisco Hernando housing complex in Sesena. El Pocero planned to build the biggest housing development in Spain, with 13,508 homes. Only around 5,000 were permitted to be built, however, and only 750 home buyers have registered so far.
…
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 04:49:06
The scariest housing bubble
China’s ‘ghost cities’ are raising fears of an epic crash with global consequences
by Chris Sorensen on Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:00pm
In Ordos, a city of 1.5 million in Inner Mongolia, there sits a mostly vacant district that was built to house and service another one million people, complete with huge public squares and museums. In Dongguan, more than 2,500 km to the south, the sprawling New South China Mall opened in 2005 to host an expected 70,000 shoppers each day, but remains mostly empty. Other so-called “ghost cities” are strewn across China.
When China’s economy was flying, such spending was little more than a curiosity, an inevitable by-product of a rapidly urbanizing country of 1.3 billion where construction investment accounts for nearly half of GDP. But these days, economic growth is slowing—the government is targeting 7.5 per cent this year, compared to more than nine per cent a few years ago—and all those empty apartments are beginning to look more sinister. Are they evidence of an epic real estate bubble waiting to burst, with global consequences, or just another relatively harmless sideshow of China’s centrally managed economy?
There’s little doubt that Beijing’s policy-makers are wrestling with an overheated property market. In a bid to clamp down on speculators who are driving up prices on units they don’t plan to live in, the government recently unveiled plans to introduce a new 20 per cent tax on profits from home sales, while raising down-payment requirements in certain cities. That, in turn, sparked a buying frenzy ahead of the new rules. In Beijing, home sales spiked 280 per cent during the first week of March, compared to the same period a year earlier. Adding fuel to the fire was a recent 60 Minutes report in which a reporter toured vacant development projects and interviewed Wang Shi, the chairman of Vanke, one of China’s biggest real estate developers. Wang said he believes China is currently in the grips of a real estate bubble and its burst would trigger an Arab Spring-like uprising. The stocks of several Chinese developers plummeted soon after the program aired.
The prospect of a housing downturn in China is not to be taken lightly. The sector has been called one of the most important in the world, influencing global prices for everything from lumber to iron ore. But experts say it’s a mistake to confuse a handful of vacant developments with the property market as whole. While empty buildings are a sure sign of overcapacity in some areas (some reports claim as many as 64 million apartments are unoccupied), big cities like Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzen continue to face a chronic shortage of housing, keeping prices up. It’s essentially the tale of two housing markets: China’s thriving coastal cities and sleepier inland centres the government is keen to develop.
…
Someone said let the DC Beltway crumble, that will teach all those Washington people.
Ummmm, not really.
Most top DC people live *inside* the Beltway and rarely drive on the Beltway. For example, Bethesda, Chevy Chase, Arlington, etc… all inside the Beltway.
As for the other bigwigs who live further out like Potomac or Burtonsville, they either a) don’t drive themselves, they have a car service b) they don’t drive at rush hours or c) they’re still not using the Beltway, because they come into town via another corridor.
The Beltway is used to go around the edges of DC, so it’s more useful to middle class or Lucky Ducky types who don’t work downtown.
Maryland also just finished the ICC (inter county connector) which has stiff tolls, which was discussed here last week. It’s basically a toll road for people who can afford $10/day to go just a few miles. They pay their $10 and get to drive 75mph while Lucky Duckies sit on the Beltway and go stop/start/stop/start all the way to their exit.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 07:11:34
Single occupant vehicle = rugged individualist.
Public transportation = communist/homosexual.
Comment by bunga bunga
2013-04-01 07:15:23
Goon, what do you call a luxurios cross country private plane ride just for you and your family?
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 07:54:34
An Obama spring break family vacation?
they should have to ride the Greyhound bus. and while theyre riding the bus, they should have to sit in the Back Of The Bus, cus they were all like born in Kenya and sh*t.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-04-01 08:05:09
All Presidents must be rich enough to fly their own planes to their own ranches.
Comment by polly
2013-04-01 09:28:19
I avoid the Beltway whenever I can which means I use it to get to two of the area’s three airports (if I can’t arrange my flights at a time to make public transportation an option) and not much else. Now, East-West Highway. Military Road and Wisconsin are an entirely different story.
Comment by usury camp resident
2013-04-01 09:38:50
An Obama spring break family vacation?
I was thinking an environmentalist.
Yours not that good but you still get a C.
Comment by joe smith
2013-04-01 10:10:00
East-West Hwy seems like a mess, but I’ve only been on the stretch between NH Ave and Baltimore-Washington Turnpike (295).
Wisconsin seems to run right through the nice parts of Bethesda, I bet they’ll keep that paved up nicely.
Comment by polly
2013-04-01 10:30:51
I don’t drive any of them during rush hour. E-W Highway is a pretty convenient road, but it is very hilly and has a lot of turns. Avoid at all costs if it is snowing or sleeting (however, that goes double for the Beltway). Shouldn’t be a problem again until next January. Or a year from January. Or two years from January. Etc.
Wisconsin/355 has had some attention recently. And I think they are going to add a sidewalk to the west side of the street through the part of Chevy Chase just south of Bethesda. They should. There are bus stops over there and they don’t line up with the stop lights. Exactly how are you supposed to safely walk from the bus stop to the next place to cross the street without a sidewalk? Maybe the country club originally blocked it because they didn’t want to be responsible for shoveling it in case of a snow storm?
The last of the world-class infrastructure built during the ridiculous wasteful Keynesian period is finally crumbling away, revealing how little we’ve invested in ourselves since we ‘wised up’.
Drove over this bridge a lot, had to go over this and the Tappan Zee bridge on the way to and from Pennsylvania most weekends when I was a kid.
Mianus River Bridge Collapse
photo credit: Hank Morgan / Time Life Pictures / Getty
accesed from the Time photo gallery here.
Location
The Mianus bridge supported the six-lane Interstate 95 where it crossed the Mianus River near Greenwich, Connecticut. You can see a satellite image of the bridge from Google Maps here: Mianus River Bridge. The latitude and longitude of the bridge are 41.0344670 and -73.5957600. You can learn more about the Mianus River on Wikipedia here.
History
The bridge was built in 1958 and collapsed in 1983, after 25 years of use. The Mianus River bridge used a “pin and hanger” design common to 1950’s era bridges (2). Pin and hanger designs had cheaper construction costs compared to other design options (2). A historic overview of the Connecticut Turnpike, “The Mianus River Bridge and its Legacy” can be visited here.
Details of the Collapse
On June 28, 1983, at 1:30AM, a 100 foot suspended span of the northbound section of the bridge collapsed, completely separating from the bridge and falling into the river (see photo above). Two tractor-trailers and two cars fell into the Mianus River. There were three deaths and three serious injuries.
Wall Street Journal - Hiring Spreads, but Only 14 Cities Top Prerecession Level:
“Employers are hiring more readily across the U.S., though only 14 of the nation’s 100 biggest metrpolitan areas have more jobs now than they did before the 2008-2009 recession.
Six of them are in Texas …
Nationally, there were 3 fewer million jobs in February, or 2% less than when employment peaked in January 2008.”
Linked from Drudge Report (love, love, love your Drudge links)
“More than two dozen teens were arrested Saturday night after dozens of groups began randomly attacking pedestrians on Chicago’s Magnificent Mile.
Police responded to reports of disturbances around 6:30 p.m. Saturday near Michigan and Chicago avenues. they said a number of teens took to the streets and started fighting.”
Not really. This is the same story we read on Drudge Report last spring in Chicago. Warm weather officially opens up the season on ‘Haves’ for the ‘Have nots’.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-01 09:02:01
After hibernating indoors all winter, the “youfs” are just unleashing some pent-up demand to go get some Justice For Trayvon or some sh*t.
And after the racis cops shoot one of those kidz, expect the media to give a quote from some fambly member about how he was “an aspiring rapper” who was “turning his life around” et cetera.
A mile of high-end shops and hoity apartments located three blocks from a ghetto is just bad manners — if not sheer stoopidity.
Could never understand the allure of that town….
Comment by MiddleCoaster
2013-04-01 11:39:35
Cabrini Green is long gone, ahansen. Gentrification has pushed the ghetto more like three miles from the Mag Mile. The misunderstood youths take the “L” downtown after getting flashmob notifications on their iPhones.
Don’t know how long it has been since you last visited Chicago. To me, it’s a beautiful city with many cultural draws, and great recreation along the lakefront. Doesn’t mean I want to live in the city; but I am glad to have it nearby.
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-04-01 15:04:10
Cant wait for the Thug Trayon pictures to surface at trial…..i heard they were nasty…if so Zimmerman wont have much to worry about
—-
After hibernating indoors all winter, the “youfs” are just unleashing some pent-up demand to go get some Justice For Trayvon or some sh*t.
Was last on a walking tour of the city in 2006 when I abruptly found myself in chain link and cracked asphalt territory mere minutes from leaving the Prada shop. But I imagine seven years is plenty of time to gentrify an outskirt?
Visited briefly again in 2010 and the shore was teeming with people who did not look as though they’d just strolled over from RL Restaurant. The income disparities were striking, especially for someone coming from Outer Los Angeles where everything is less condensed and money is more dispersed.
1,000 people a day are moving to Cape Coral, Florida. Cape Coral real estate can only go up. They aren’t making any more land in Cape Coral. Interest rates are at historic lows. Only a licensed Realtor can guide you through the home buying process. Hurry!
These kidz need more meds. Only Big Pharma can save them:
“Nearly one in five high school age boys in the United States and 11 percent of school-age children over all have received a medical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder … These rates reflect a marked rise over the last decade and could fuel growing concern among many doctors that the A.D.H.D. diagnosis and its medication are overused in American children.”
concern among many doctors that the A.D.H.D. diagnosis and its medication are overused in American children.”
It is. And while they’re at it, they should look into the fact that antibiotics are still prescribed for colds (all mislabeled as “sinus infections”) in the US- all the time.
We are way over-medicated, thanks to our great health care system.
I’m not sure it is the doctors or the parents. Speaking with my children’s doctor over their ear infections (caused by a virus); she asked if we wanted something to treat it. I asked what it could be, her response was that almost all parents demand something be done, so lots of doctors just prescribe an antibiotic to get the parents out the door. The ear infection will likely clear on its own after a few days, so the parents are happy and an anxious parent is quieted down.
Parental ignorance is, in my opinion, the number one cause of the over diagnosis of ADHD and the prescribing of antibiotics for viral infections in children.
Or as a friend said: I don’t think my two boys have ADHD, I think I just have two young boys who’d rather be outside running around and exploring and learning about how the world works instead of learning to regurgitate some mundane fact on a multiple-choice test so the politicians can claim accountability.
God forbid the kids’ parents should provide discipline. Dope is so much easier. Another factor is the lack of physical actively. So many kids spend their play time on the computer.
Here’s something I find interesting; we pretty much laugh off threats of nuclear attack from North Korea. But we threaten to attack Iran all the time even though they don’t have a nuke and if they did, couldn’t deliver it.
There’s no bang for the bucks by threatening to attack NoKo.
Furthermore, every neocon’s legs gets tingly even with the though of bombing brown moosleems. Just ask 2Banana. I bet he’s already wrapped himself in red, white and blue.
Ben, I have been too busy to post, in fact most days even to peak at the blog, but I will bite on this one. Iran has the ability to cut-off the supply of oil from the Gulf and make gasoline go to $10 a barrel. It is active in working to spread its form of Islam in the region and is having some success. All North Korea can do is damage some of our competitors in the high tech space. It is having no impact in the region converting people to its views.
Thank you Jose and that was peek not peak. Thinking of peak oil, perhaps. BTW, perhaps I should not start this since I do not have time to engage but here goes. Even the Economist Magazine is now questioning the amount of global warming caused between 1978-98. At one time you had the advocates attributing almost of it, now you have a lot of people saying 1/3. Remember I have consistently used 14%. Not bad for someone who does not have a Nobel peace prize. The question is now: can you really call co2 a pollutant if it is keeping the world from going into a mini-ice age? A question Europe in particular is asking the last few months.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-04-01 08:03:02
90% of people are willing to believe the most illogical stuff if only told by a voice of authority. We are herd animals and thinking is too hard.
H2O is a much worse actor than CO2. More difficult to float a tax on that though.
Right. Because particulate matter from burning coal mixed with CO and CO2 is historically so conducive to human life.
Ten years ago when the “maybe-atmospheric-pollution-is-really-PROTECTING-the-planet” meme was first floated as a smart-ass response to science deniers in the US Congress, it was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. Why am I not surprised to see IPCC’s Rajendra Pachauri’s recent comments being misquoted by the Drudge brigade today?
While global surface temperatures may be in hiatus - for many reasons including those posited by Hansen’s paper — the rate of HEAT ACCUMULATION on earth has not slowed at all.
Graham Lloyd, (whose article being referenced here “The Australian” was forced to retract), is an oft-discredited hack for the American coal and oil lobby.
Right. Because particulate matter from burning coal mixed with CO and CO2 is historically so conducive to human life.
Coal mixed with co and co2? I do not even know what that means and neither do you. Coal is primarily carbon and when it burns it adds either o or o2 depending on how rich the air is in oxygen. Carbon in the air is very useful to plants, it is the other elements in coal that are the problem but they can be removed or reduced dramatically.
You can state that world is getting warmer over and over but it does not make it fact. Even according to James Hansen’s manipulated data the average of the first two months of this year is cooler than the average of temperature for 1998. 1998 .61C warmer than a base period, I think 1951-80 (off the top of my head) compared to .55C this year compared to the same base. We have been flat to down for almost two decades despite an increasing amount of co2 in the air. Completely contrary to predictions, which has just about everyone but you admitting that AGW was overestimated in the 1980s.
Burning coal produces carbon dioxide.When there is insufficient combustion, carbon monoxide is produced.(When carbon dioxide gas is passed over heated charcoal it forms carbon monoxide.) CO2 (g) + C (s) > 2CO (g). Which kills people, especially when it combines with low-lying fogs.
While global surface temperatures may be in temporary hiatus, the rate of HEAT ACCUMULATION on earth has not slowed at all. Approximately 90% of global warming goes into heating the oceans.
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 16:03:37
The first part is just saying what I said in a different manner and you should cite your source since I can tell it is a quote that you really do not understand since it is not what occurs in a coal power plant. In fact, it is two different quotes patched together.
As far as 90% of the warming going into the oceans that is more theory than fact. We do not know how enough data to know how warm the water was deep so we don’t know whether ocean warming that has occurred is due to uplift in the ocean or a warmer atmosphere. All we do know is the combined ocean and air measurements that we do have and have been taking since 1979 show no change in about twenty years and in fact we have a slight cooling trend in place. That may change radically over the next years if the predictions about a lack of sunspots is correct. You know when the predictions by the AGW crowd have some accuracy I might start taking them more seriously. 20 years ago we were told that children in Great Britain would never see snow by now and now they are buried by it.
If and when it is to China’s advantage to do so, they can squash their crazy little neighbor like a bug.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2013-04-01 13:52:52
If and when it is to China’s advantage to do so
I wouldn’t be all that surprised if an NKor nuke detonated somewhere in China before one went off anywhere else.
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2013-04-01 14:41:12
And I think this is why North Korea gets a lot less direct attention from the US. We are relying on China to keep them under control and China has let our government know that unilateral action against North Korea is a bad idea.
If NK launches an attack, the dynamic may change in that part of the world.
‘Iran has the ability to cut-off the supply of oil from the Gulf…It is active in working to spread its form of Islam in the region and is having some success.’
None of that has anything to do with nukes. Why are we constantly told there is a nuke threat from Iran, when we make jokes about North Korea, who actually have these weapons and issue statements about hitting the US with them?
Here’s an inconsistency; we know North Korea wouldn’t dare to use nukes. The same with Iran. But we’ve got Iran surrounded with bases, aircraft carriers, etc. We use cyber attacks against Iran, Their scientists are assassinated. We’re running a proxy war (using Al-Qaeda, as we supposedly fight them in Afghanistan) against Iran through Syria.
It just seems to me that someone in the media would contrast the Iran/N Korea reactions.
Ben, the issues are related. We do not take the threats by North Korea to attack the US with nukes seriously since they do not have the capacity to hit anywhere but Alaska and we have defensive missiles to stop that.
They do not have the conventional weapons capacity to cut-off anything we need.
Iran is different they have the capacity to cut-off oil supplies. While we have the conventional forces to end that cut-off, if they have nuclear weapons they could attack our forces or nuke Saudi Arabia. This is similar to the situation in Korean area where the South Koreans have had to absorb the limited conventional attacks by the North without a response, at least in part because of the threat to go nuclear. A nuclear capacity would allow Iran to engage in a more aggressive policy in the region.
Add to that the ability to attack Israel and you are dealing with a very different situation.
‘We do not take the threats by North Korea to attack the US with nukes seriously since they do not have the capacity to hit anywhere but Alaska and we have defensive missiles to stop that’
So we don’t have bases in that part of the world? You are purposefully dancing around the essential contradiction here. Never mind.
‘Iran is different they have the capacity to cut-off oil supplies’
Then we should try to get along with them, huh?
‘A nuclear capacity would allow Iran to engage in a more aggressive policy in the region’
Aggressive like invading Iraq? Oh, that was the US! Isn’t it a crime to invade a country who poses no threat and hasn’t done anything?
How about assassinating scientists; not in Pakistan, but on the streets of Iran. What’s the word for that? Terrorism.
‘Add to that the ability to attack Israel’
Like Israel doesn’t go around killing, bombing, assassinating people, shooting up ships/cars all the time. I can’t imagine why anyone would want to attack Israel!
Don’t look now, but the boys are coming home from yet another failed military adventure. I understand there are 2 US military suicides a day. Citizens here are stocking up on guns and ammo, and not to fight Muslims, BTW. If you look hard, you might see the Empires high-water mark fading in the distance.
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-01 09:43:41
No flattery intended but you are one badassed mofo when it comes to wielding truth. You just shutdown the conversation using it.
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 09:53:08
Ben, I have been against any nation building efforts in the Middle East. The bodies are coming home because in both Iraq and Afghanistan we tried to go beyond punishing people for bad behavior to trying to create a democracy in an area which is not fertile to democracy. Both wars would have been cheap in blood and money had we restricted our aims. In Afghanistan, we should have just insisted that the terrorists have no base and in Iraq the removal of Saddam for his actions against us which included an attempt on a US presidents life when visiting Kuwait. Flipping Iraq from a Sunni dominated to a Shiite dominated country just helped Iran.
Hint:
It has little to do with nukes and everything to do with Iran’s oil bourse no longer being denominated in USD. (As of 3/20/12, which coincidentally was just about when the war drums began to beat.)
Remember, “we” invaded Iraq not because Saddam was selling oil too high, but because he was selling it too low.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 11:35:40
Remember, “we” invaded Iraq not because Saddam was selling oil too high, but because he was selling it too low.
Link?
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 13:03:59
It has little to do with nukes and everything to do with Iran’s oil bourse no longer being denominated in USD. (As of 3/20/12, which coincidentally was just about when the war drums began to beat.)
Now, I do agree that THIS played a role, Iraq also tried to price its oil outside the USD. Banksters will fight to protect fiat money and US banksters will fight to keep the USD as the reserve currency. Manipulate the metals markets, war, whatever it takes not to lose the ability to control the money supply and thus the stock market etc. This knowledge of when money is easy or tight or to make it loose or tight allows them to accumulate more wealth.
The US is definitely Israel’s friend. Is Israel the US’ friend? I think less so. It makes sense after WWII the Jews wanted out of Europe but talk about going from the frying pan to the fire.
For a fraction of the blood and money spent on Israel you could set up a Jew community in the southwest of US.
Sand is sand. I say this as someone who ancestry is 1/2 Jewish and who had many family members perish in the holocaust. But this obsession about a patch of sand in the middle east is insane. But I guess I am here in the US because my ancestors were more sane. They left Europe right before WWI. They could see it coming. They had four teenage sons and thought four teenage sons + war not a good combo. The eldest enlisted much to his parents’ horror but came to the US after his stint as a POW when the war ended.
There’s quite the brain drain out of Israel. And, you won’t believe this, but guess where those brains are going.
If you guessed the United States, you’re right. They’re coming here. Because of our political stability. And for the fact that we’re surrounded by friendlier neighbors.
Comment by usury camp resident
2013-04-01 13:18:38
Is Israel the US’ friend?
USS Liberty
Comment by albuquerquedan
2013-04-01 14:04:14
It was a shameful example of putting domestic politics above US interests. The Israeli lobby which primarily supported democrats but had significant Republican support pressured the US to cover up the murder of US servicemen during the 67 war by Israel’s air force. President Johnson should have been ashamed of himself.
But as the Arab countries have moved from a Pan-Arabist modernizing ideology to a 7th century ideology that requires the conquering of the world for Islam by military means if necessary, we actually share more in common with Israel and making them make concessions will not make the world safer. Even Israel knows they should have made peace before the rise of radical Islam but now it is too late and the irony is they helped it by funding Hamas to undermine the PLO and split Arab Christians from Arab Moslems.
Here’s something I find interesting; we pretty much laugh off threats of nuclear attack from North Korea. But we threaten to attack Iran all the time even though they don’t have a nuke and if they did, couldn’t deliver it.
Here, you get to the gist of why many countries are eager to have nuclear weapons.
It’s hard for many to see the issue from the side of the opponent. But doing so is necessary to understand the overall situation. Surprisingly, the Iranians don’t see themselves as cartoon villains.
The inability of Spain and France to drastically cut budget deficits in a recessionary economy is a clear proof – if one was needed – that the German austerity mantra is nonsense and has always been. These two countries are the “declared” cases of budgetary slippages, but others will follow.
Confiscations of bank deposits are a much more dangerous nonsense. A failure of financial authorities to supervise the banking system is a failure of public policy, a failure of people whose salaries are paid by depositors as taxpayers to provide an essential public good: a sound and a reliable financial system. By reaching into depositors’ – taxpayers’ – pockets to pay for errors of public policy, the German-Dutch-Finnish disciplinarians are not only violating the rules of public service, but they are also running afoul of basic principles of social equity and justice.
I hope Washington will take all this very seriously. Surely, some Beltway pundits will probably gloat about German incompetence. And they might also like the fact that the U.S. is benefiting from the flight of capital to its safe, deep and broad financial markets
And when you stop to think about how things are sucking here at home, you have to wonder just how bad they are elsewhere.
And when you stop to think about how things are sucking here at home, you have to wonder just how bad they are elsewhere ??
Exactly Colorado…Other than maybe Germany what other country is safe in the EU ?? We are the cleanest shirt in the dirty laundry…So they are buying our assets & bonds because they believe its the only haven that has a good chance of returning the principal even if its eroded by some inflation over time…
If sometime wonder what I would do with a Powerball jackpot if I was lucky enough to win it. Where could I stash it to keep it safe? Treasuries? Stock market? Corporate Bonds? Swiss bank accounts. Piles of gold coins? (I guess I could swim in them a la Scrooge McDuck)
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Anon In DC
2013-04-01 14:43:01
By living well (this could mean doing charity, etc…) Good memories should be a part of every portfolio. Since one’s time is finite.
That link did not work either. But in general what those on the left just do not want to admit, austerity is not a first choice, it is what happens when you run out of money and credit. Germany was just more responsible and it engaged in its austerity first. The countries are broke, they have to engage in austerity despite the pain, the longer we pretend we can just borrow money the worse it is going to be for us. Increasing consumption with debt is not a long term strategy, creating another housing bubble (our present policy) is just making the problem worse. The argument made by Krugman that we should borrow while its cheap, is no better than the real estate agent who encouraged people to take the teaser rate on the mortgage. The low interest rates cannot and will not last and servicing of the debt will consume all the tax revenue.
Running a deficit is essentially borrowing growth from the future. Because we have run up almost 7 trillion dollars in debt the last five years, we are going to grow slower in the future.
The low interest rates cannot and will not last and servicing of the debt will consume all the tax revenue ??
Which is why I suspect the tax code will be completely overhauled…
How do we get more revenue ?? No more tax subsides for farmers…No more MID…No more deduction for state & local taxes…No more child credit…Less welfare…Less food stamps…Smaller military budget…On & On…They will get the revenue…They MUST…Its not like they have a choice…They will just get it in a way that you cannot avoid…National sales tax would be another one…
Scdave , it will consume all the present revenue stream, if you allow the debt to grow and then interest rates increase. You are right that no matter what they will get the revenue and austerity will be imposed. However, the longer we put off austerity the harsher the austerity will have to be.
However, the longer we put off austerity the harsher the austerity will have to be.
I once saw a movie called “Deadly Equations” or something like that. About excess weight on a spacecraft and the longer they waited to solve the problem the more weight would have to be jettisoned in order to survive. Eventually including people.
However, the longer we put off austerity the harsher the austerity will have to be ??
I don’t know about harsher but longer maybe….Problem is we have to many riding in the wagon and not enough people pulling it…Tax Reform will get a lot more people pulling than riding….I still think a national sales tax is in the cards…It would raise a boat load of revenue and everyone would pay…
Or they could just print massive piles of money and instead of handing to rich wall street types they could rebuild our infrastructure and telecomunications and give incentives for distributive generation - ie generators in every business with combined heat and power generation (80% eff vs current model of 35% ) solar geothermal etc.
Then initiate trade policy that charges taxes on countries that don’t pay a certain minimum wage.
These things would generate revenue and stimulate the economy and the velocity of money.
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 09:17:23
Updated March 31, 2013, 10:20 p.m. ET Crossroad Ahead for Investors Cornered by Fed Into Buying Riskier Assets, It’s a Guessing Game When Central Bank Decides to Turn Off Liquidity Spigot.
By TOM LAURICELLA
Investors have been rewarded since the financial crisis for following the old Wall Street adage of “Don’t fight the Fed.” That has meant loading up on stocks and riskier corporate debt as the Federal Reserve’s low interest rates have reduced the attractiveness of “safer” investments such as Treasurys.
But investors now find themselves having to constantly look over their shoulder to see when the Fed will shift gears or risk losing what they have gained.
During the first quarter, the move into riskier assets only intensified, with major central banks around the globe influencing financial markets to an even greater degree than just a few months ago. The result: record-breaking rallies in U.S. stocks and below-investment-grade bonds.
Not only has the Fed significantly expanded its footprint in the financial markets by essentially doubling the pace of its bond buying from last year, but the Bank of Japan is likely to finally join the aggressive easy-money club in an attempt to revive the moribund Japanese economy.
Those expectations alone—the Bank of Japan hasn’t actually done anything yet in 2013—were enough to spark a 19% rally in the Nikkei Stock Average in the first quarter. That made Japanese stocks the best performers among developed-economy stock markets, a big change from their reputation as dead money in a country mired in a long stagnation. Meanwhile, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index gained 10% on its way to a record of 1569.19 on the final trading day of the quarter.
If it does open the spigots of monetary easing, the Bank of Japan would join in with the Fed, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and, to a lesser degree, the European Central Bank, with policies aimed squarely at the financial markets.
“It’s no longer just a question of fighting the Fed, you’re fighting them all,” said Jason Trennert, chief investment strategist at Strategas Research Partners.
…
Shakespeare was a tax-evading food hoarder, study claims
William Shakespeare evaded tax and illegally stockpiled food during times of shortage so he could sell it at high prices, academics have claimed.
… a new study has found that he was repeatedly prosecuted and fined for illegally hoarding food, and threatened with jail for failing to pay his taxes, The Sunday Times reported.
Court and tax records show that over a 15-year period Shakespeare purchased grain, malt and barley to store and resell for inflated prices, according to a paper by Aberystwyth University academics Dr Jayne Archer, Professor Richard Marggraf Turley and Professor Howard Thomas.
The study notes: “By combining both illegal and legal activities, Shakespeare was able to retire in 1613 as the largest property owner in his home town, Stratford-upon-Avon. His profits - minus a few fines for illegal hoarding and tax evasion - meant he had a working life of just 24 years.”
a few fines for illegal hoarding and tax evasion
He was simply “saving” money in one of the few ways possible at the time. “Illegality” is sometimes simply a figment of an oligarch’s imagination.
A fuel shortage has helped send food prices soaring. Electricity is blacking out even before the summer. And gas-line gunfights have killed at least five people and wounded dozens over the past two weeks.
California imposed a new law on banks innocuously called “Homeowners Bill of Rights” which forces banks to switch over to a judicial foreclosure process, which they can opt to do on their own, but takes a year or more to renegotiate contracts and compensation structures for the foreclosure law firms who do all the leg work for the banks. And while those changes are being made… it makes it appear that foreclosures have slowed down dramatically in the state.
The reality?
Defaults (undeclared) are spiraling upward that yet have to pass through the foreclosure pipeline.
The truth?
California is still the highest foreclosure state in sheer volume and percentage.
The low-down?
Resale housing is still massively overpriced as a result of unprecedented interference by individual states and the federal government. The market distortions will be removed and the down draft will continue allowing the market to correct.
With millions of excess empty houses and housing demand at 17 year lows, housing prices have a long way to fall. A very long way to fall.
Ben, here’s one for the next time you do an international news desk-clearing. For the record, I have not been to Medellín, but what I’ve seen in Bogotá is very similar to this.
________________________________/
“In 2010, Medellin saw a price increase of 5.8%, followed by 6.2% in 2011 and 5.9% in 2012. This is pretty reflective of many parts of Colombia.
So is the real estate bubble coming?
I get this question a lot in Medellin as there is a lot of pre-construction high rise development going on, all over town, and especially in El Poblado, Medellin’s answer to Beverly Hills. Visitors say how can you keep building up this inventory? Surely it cannot sustain itself and prices will collapse.
Since I have to explain this to prospective buyers it is critical that my research be credible and believable. So here is why I think that not only is there no bubble in Colombia, but that there has never been a better time to buy, especially in Medellin.”
Thanks, I haven’t been able to do research lately because the foreclosure business is overwhelming right now. But from the article:
‘I get this question a lot in Medellin as there is a lot of pre-construction high rise development going on, all over town, and especially in El Poblado, Medellin’s answer to Beverly Hills. Visitors say how can you keep building up this inventory? Surely it cannot sustain itself and prices will collapse.’
‘Since I have to explain this to prospective buyers it is critical that my research be credible and believable. So here is why I think that not only is there no bubble in Colombia, but that there has never been a better time to buy, especially in Medellin’
‘wages are pegged to the annual inflation rate which from 2002-2008 ranged from 4-8% and from 2009-2012 ranged from 3-4%. Thus more than 50% of each year’s price increases in real estate are offset by higher annual wages that are pegged to the national inflation rate’
(Of course wages go up during a bubble. You might see 25YO mortgage brokers make 300k a year. I remember during the dotcom bubble, a guy would deliver as package on his bicycle and we would hire him on the spot. And still, the writer doesn’t explain the OTHER 50% of price increases.)
‘If you grant Medellin as being a “cosmopolitan city”, which most people would agree, then Medellin is the lowest priced cosmopolitan city in the world on a cost per sq. meter basis…The secondary market, where we do most of our sales, prices are typically between $800 and $1400 per sq. meter ($74 - $130 per sq. ft). This certainly implies that Medellin and many other parts of Colombia are a bargain when comparing prices internationally. When have you ever heard of bargain prices in a real estate bubble?’
(Yes, the old, “we’re cheaper than London” routine.)
‘Thus I believe the Colombian “housing bubble” is uniformed diatribe.’
(And we finish up with the usual nasty put down of non-believers.)
Los Angeles, March 17, 2013 - In recent months, real estate pundits have been saying that the housing markets are recovering. They point to increases in sales and home prices, as well as a decline in foreclosure filings, and predict that the worst of the foreclosure crisis is over.
The crisis may be almost over for the banks, but it is far from over for average people. Banks have completed foreclosure on approximately 3.9 million homes since September 2008, according to a Dec. 2012 report by CoreLogic. And 1.3 million homes, or 3.2% of all homes with a mortgage, were in some stage of the foreclosure process as of October, 2012.
1. Looking forward, there are another three million homes that are seriously delinquent and have yet to enter foreclosure.
2. With so many homeowners losing or having lost their homes, what is causing the increase in sales and prices? A look at the business press reveals that the so-called recovery of the market is based more on the purchase of homes by investors than home ownership by American families, which is on the decline.
…
“Wealthy homeowners are increasingly asking their houses to earn their keep.
Lenders say a growing number of luxury homeowners are turning to a prerecession tactic of withdrawing equity from their homes. And just like during the housing bubble, many of these affluent borrowers aren’t using this cash to renovate their homes. Instead, they’re pumping it into investments, including the stock market, other real-estate purchases or even using the money to purchase art, which they expect will generate large returns going forward. In other cases, they’re choosing to use this cash to pay for their children’s college tuition or other expenses that they’d otherwise finance with higher-interest debt.
Experts say the increase in cash-out refinancing comes at an opportune time: Interest rates remain near historic lows and the U.S. stock market is at record highs. Rates on 30-year fixed private jumbo mortgages—which start after $417,000 in most parts of the country and exceed $625,500 in pricey metro areas—average 4.02% as of the week ending March 22. That’s down from 4.70% a year prior and 5.49% two years ago, according to mortgage info website HSH.com. Rates on the 15-year fixed private jumbo average 3.30%, compared with 3.95% and 3.96%, respectively.
“Experts say the increase in cash-out refinancing comes at an opportune time: Interest rates remain near historic lows and the U.S. stock market is at record highs.”
“… U.S. stock market is at record highs.”
Which is - what? - a reason to mortgage one’s house so as to buy stocks?
Raise the price of most anything and generally sales will drop off. Lower the price and generally sales will pick up. Nobody thinks this to be strange.
If stocks have their prices lowered then sales of stocks drop off. If their prices are raised then sales pick up. Nobody thinks this as being strange either, which is a bit strange in itself if one cares to think about it a bit.
Price equals value? Raise the price and - presto - you raise the value?
What’s neat about raising the price of stocks or the price of houses is you don’t have to work to raise the price of every share of stock or work to raise the price of every house in the neighborhood. No, you only have to work to raise the price of a representative few shares of stock or raise the price of a representative few number of houses.
Raise the price of a representative few shares of stock or a few houses and the price of all the comps will rise right along with it. And when you raise the value of all the comps - whether they are stocks or houses - then you make the owners of the comps all the more richer.
Yeah, like you’ll hear about stocks rising on “thin volume”. Right now homeowner formation is dropping by many thousands a quarter, but we’re told houses are in short supply. This is a PT Barnum market.
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-04-01 22:33:15
Where do you see homeowner formation dropping?
The last three reported quarters by the Census (Table 8 on their Housing Vacancies and Homeownership Historical Tables) show increasing numbers of homeowners. And total households (homeowner PLUS renter households) is up by about 1MM year on year.
Total vacant housing units represent 13.48% of the total in Q4 2012, down from 13.88% Q4 of 2011.
Do you mean the homeownership rate is falling? That is still correct, as there are proportionately more new renter households than buyer households each quarter.
And to be clear, I’m not saying everything is hunky dory…there are clearly parts of the country that have not yet begun to clear their distress, but things are generally heading in the right direction (albeit slowly).
And I don’t define “right direction” as rising home prices. I define “right direction” as moving back to “normalcy” in terms of distress, vacancy, household formation, and stable levels of housing development (appropriate to the growth of the US population).
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-04-02 05:43:20
And the most recent Census shows another decade of slowing population growth to the lowest levels in US history.
Vacant housing? With 25 MILLION excess empty houses and growing by the day, It’s going to be a long time to get back to typical vacancy rates. Worse yet, an additional 35 MILLION houses have just begun to vacate as boomers head to the grave.
So how does all this excess housing inventory and land jive now that you’ve disclosed that you have a stake in the direction of prices?
(Newser) – A major Supreme Court decision in India could be good news for patients in developing countries, activists say. The court ruled that Novartis couldn’t have a new patent for a tuneup to an existing cancer drug, since it’s not a new medicine, the AP reports. “Patents will be given only for genuine inventions, and repetitive patents will not be given for minor tweaks to an existing drug,” a lawyer for a generic drugmaker said. India produces generic drugs for countries across the developing world.
The fight over the drug, known as Glivec or Gleevec, began in 2006 after India’s patent office denied Novartis’ application; the office referred to “evergreening,” when companies seek new patents after slightly altering medicines. “The generic version makes it affordable to so many more poor people, not just in India, but across the world,” said an activist. “For cancer sufferers, this ruling will mean the difference between life and death.” Novartis, however, said the decision was a “setback for patients.” Said an exec: “We strongly believe patents safeguard innovation and encourage medical progress.”
ft dot com
April 1, 2013 8:24 pm
US has lost 2m clerical jobs since 2007
By Robin Harding in Washington
The US has gained 387,000 managers and lost almost 2m clerical jobs since 2007, as new technologies replace office workers and plunge the American middle class deeper into crisis.
Data from the Bureau of Labour Statistics divide the US workforce into 821 jobs from dishwasher to librarian. They show rapid structural shifts – on top of a cyclical unemployment rate of 7.7 per cent – that may increase income inequality.
The figures help explain why the US median household income has fallen 5.6 per cent since June 2009 to $51,404, even as the economy recovers. The top 10 per cent of American earners, meanwhile, are collecting most fruits of the recovery.
One probable cause of rising inequality is new computing technologies that destroy some middle-class occupations even as they create jobs for highly skilled workers who can exploit them.
The number of clerical workers such as book-keepers, tellers, data entry keyers, file clerks and typists has been falling, pointing to a structural decline. The number of retail cashiers has also dropped – indicating that internet shopping and self-checkout systems may be eroding another occupation.
Employment growth came from healthcare, management, computing and food service jobs. The number of personal care aides is up 390,000 since 2007. Demand for people who figure out how to replace clerical workers – such as operations managers, management analysts and logisticians – grew substantially.
“We see growth in jobs that require complex, personalised interactions, such as home health aides, and continued declines in routine transaction and production jobs that can be scripted and automated,” said Susan Lund, co-author of a McKinsey Global Institute report on the future of work.
…
A federal bankruptcy judge ruled on Monday that the city of Stockton, Calif., was eligible for court protection from its creditors, clearing the way for a battle over whether public workers’ pensions can be cut when the city they work for goes bankrupt.
After declaring Chapter 9 bankruptcy last year, Stockton eliminated tens of millions of dollars in city services and said it would cut back some municipal bond payments in a way unseen before in municipal bankruptcy. But bondholders objected to Stockton’s effort to protect pensions while forcing losses on investors.
Many states have statutes and constitutional provisions making it illegal to cut public workers’ pensions. Until now, there has not been a major test of those laws in bankruptcy — particularly not in California, where the big state pension system, known as Calpers, has been girding for battle on the issue, trying to avoid the precedent of a cutoff or shortfall in a city’s pension contributions.
Federal bankruptcy law often trumps state laws, but municipal bankruptcies are so rare that there is almost no precedent on how to apply the law to state pension provisions.
In a ruling issued Monday in Sacramento, Judge Christopher M. Klein said he could see battle lines being drawn between Calpers and Stockton’s other creditors, including several companies that either bought Stockton’s bonds or insured them. But he ruled that it was still too early in the case for that battle to be joined.
“There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon,” he said.
…
But the case is also being watched closely because it could answer the significant question of who gets paid first by financially strapped cities — retirement funds or creditors.
“I don’t know whether spiked pensions can be reeled back in,” U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein said while making the ruling. “There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon.
…. and she attended a seminar how to good money after bad on a depreciating asset called a “house”. The seminar was sponsored and facilitated by CraterCare
Postcard alerts of foreclosure cash for more than 683,000 Floridians could be ignored
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
More than 683,000 Floridians are expected to receive foreclosure-restitution checks beginning this month through federal agreements with banks, but consumer advocates fear the letters could be mistaken for a scam or junk mail and thrown away.
The agreements, which replace the failed Independent Foreclosure Review, dole out $3.6 billion in cash to 4.2 million homeowners nationwide who were in some stage of foreclosure during 2009 and 2010.
Those eligible for the cash, including 50,599 people in Palm Beach County, should have received a postcard within the past two weeks alerting them a check worth between $250 and $125,000 is on its way.
But the unassuming postcard from Minneapolis-based Rust Consulting, the firm contracted by federal regulators to disburse the checks, is being questioned by wary homeowners already overwhelmed with foreclosure-related mailings. Rust Consulting also has an office in Palm Beach Gardens.
“I didn’t know what it was,” said Vero Beach resident Sheri Forman about the postcard. “When we were going through a loan modification we got all kinds of things in the mail from people saying they were going to give us $10,000 or whatever. There are so many scams.”
In January, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said it had reached agreements with 13 financial institutions to atone for foreclosure-related abuses and replace the Independent Foreclosure Review. The review had asked homeowners to apply to have their foreclosure inspected and receive compensation based on the findings.
Few people signed up for the review despite a $35 million advertising campaign and two deadline extensions. As of late September, just 3.8 percent of Floridians who were sent letters about the program had applied. In Palm Beach County, 50,599 residents were sent letters explaining the review, and 1,954 responded.
“I couldn’t believe people weren’t calling up for free money,” said Jim DiPaola, a Palm Beach County Realtor with Keller Williams and co-host of the show “Talk Real Estate with Rob and Jim” on WZZR 94.3.
DiPaola said the review was discussed several times on his program. Now, he’s concerned homeowners will miss out again by ignoring the postcard and check.
Kevin Maher, community outreach director for West Palm Beach-based DebtHelper.com shares DiPaola’s worry. A volunteer for DebtHelper.com brought in one of the postcards recently asking whether it was legitimate, he said.
“I’ve seen enough missed opportunities by homeowners because they were uninformed about options or programs,” Maher said. “I just had a feeling this could be a likely scenario.”
In addition to the $3.6 billion in cash payments, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency agreements provide $5.7 billion in other mortgage relief, such as principal reductions or short sale approvals. The agreements are separate from the $25 billion attorneys general settlement reached in February 2012.
For more information go to http://www.independentforeclosurereview.com or call Rust Consulting at 888-952-9105. Borrowers can also seek advice from a federal housing counselor at 888-995-4673.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. —
The people of Stockton will feel financial fallout for years after a federal judge ruled Monday to let the city become the most populous in the nation to enter bankruptcy.
But the case is also being watched closely because it could answer the significant question of who gets paid first by financially strapped cities — retirement funds or creditors.
“I don’t know whether spiked pensions can be reeled back in,” U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein said while making the ruling. “There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon.”
The potential constitutional question in the Stockton case is whether federal bankruptcy law trumps a California law that says money owed to the state pension fund must be paid.
In making his ruling, Klein disagreed with creditors who argued that Stockton failed to pursue all avenues for straightening out its financial affairs.
“It’s apparent to me the city would not be able to perform its obligations to its citizens on fundamental public safety as well as other basic government services without the ability to have the muscle of the contract-impairing power of federal bankruptcy law,” Klein said.
‘At issue will be whether U.S. bankruptcy law trumps California law, which says the pension plan must be funded. The $900 million Stockton owes to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to cover pensions is its biggest debt -– as is the case with many cities in California.’
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 19:16:40
‘The $900 million Stockton owes to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to cover pensions is its biggest debt -– as is the case with many cities in California.’
Just shy of $1 bn in pension debt for one small California city? Wow…
Yup, our pension loving overlords sure have screwed us. Jerry Brown doesn’t even have the guts to face up to current employees when it comes to stopping practices like pension spiking.
After he presented his plan, that would clearly stop pension spiking for new employees, but left it intact for current employees, I wrote his office asking why they didn’t stop this egregious practice for all pensioners, and they simply referred me to his plan…deflect.
Until public unions have lost some of this stranglehold over Sacramento, I will never vote in favor of anything that gives them more power, and will vote in favor of everything, no matter how far reaching, that takes some of their power away.
oxide
We purchased our bathroom vanities from Lowes and love them. We went with a builders style, that doesn’t have feet and look replaced. Chocolate w/ Quartz counter tops. I bought the Allen and Roth Leaves fixture (using CFLs) in the hall ba, and a round beveled mirror at Target in Oil Rubbed Bronze, and it looks beautiful.
Lowes had a double towel rod by Delta that was hard to find.
Our home is beautiful. Now its planting the front yard time. We just had a brick and cement entry done. Circa 1960’s and no one ever gave this home a walkway/steps to the front door. It’s finally inviting.
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb Thrower™
2013-04-01 20:21:21
What better way to restore a Rule of Law in the Wild, Wild West financial services industry than to take away their seats in the halls of political power? Perhaps the beginning of the end of ‘too big to jail’ is at hand.
ft dot com
Jamming Wall St’s revolving door to power
By Tom Braithwaite Potential damage from Washington’s distaste for bankers
It is now hard to believe that a career on Wall Street was once a qualification rather than an impediment for a job in Washington.
When Hank Paulson moved from Goldman Sachs to the Treasury in 2006, his banking past was neither excoriated nor really examined.
A Democratic senator did note the revolving door between Goldman and the government. But this is how he did it: “[Mr Paulson would] continue the long history of Goldman Sachs heads, including former Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin, New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, Deputy Secretary of State John Whitehead, serving their country with great distinction and success.”
Times have changed. The current head of Goldman is highly unlikely to be allowed to serve his country with distinction. And last week it emerged that Ruth Porat, chief financial officer of Morgan Stanley, will not be nominated as deputy Treasury secretary. Two people familiar with the situation say they feared her finances would be attacked during a congressional hearing.
Back in 2006 Washington barely blinked when Mr Paulson sold half a billion dollars of Goldman stock in advance of his move to Treasury. (It proved quite a good deal. Had he been forced to hold on to it he would have seen it halve in the crisis and still fail to surpass the previous level now.) It also came with a customary tax break – just try introducing something similar today – that allows wealthy individuals joining the government to defer capital gains tax.
If it is a new-found distaste for Wall Street that sunk Ms Porat’s nomination, it would be a shame for Washington and worse for Wall Street.
One of the industry’s most senior women, she helped shepherd Morgan Stanley through turbulent years after the crisis, shoring up investor confidence that the bank’s capital and liquidity was sound and could withstand further shocks.
She serves on the Treasury borrowing advisory committee, an industry panel that counsels government officials on debt issuance and wider market stability.
Following the departure of Tim Geithner as secretary, the Treasury needs someone with financial clout. Mr Geithner is being replaced by Jack Lew, a budget wonk – arguably the right horse for the course but not a markets expert.
The crisis is over but the new regulations are worryingly unfinished. The reinvention of the US housing system, on which, incidentally, Ms Porat quietly advised the Treasury in 2008, has not even started. New problems such as student loans are brewing.
For Wall Street the stakes are higher. If the industry has sunk so low that its top talent cannot be safely considered for Treasury jobs, bankers will lose their seat at the table.
…
Brad DeLong is puzzled by Martin Feldstein’s mental contortions as he tries to come up with a reason to raise interest rates in a depressed economy. So am I. But I’m also puzzled by Feldstein’s underlying economic analysis, in which he treats it as totally obvious that we have a massive bond bubble.
Now, maybe we do have a bond bubble. But the arguments Feldstein uses are one that I thought every sensible economist — a group I thought included Feldstein — had dismissed as bogus years ago. Feldstein writes:
Historically, the real interest rate on ten-year Treasuries has been above 2%; thus, today’s rate is about two percentage points below its historical average. But those historical rates prevailed at times when fiscal deficits and federal government debt were much lower than they are today. With budget deficits that are projected to be 5% of GDP by the end of the coming decade, and a debt/GDP ratio that has roughly doubled in the past five years and is continuing to grow, the real interest rate on Treasuries should be significantly higher than it was in the past.
In the words of Charlie Brown, aauuuggghhh! Why do we have large fiscal deficits? Because of the collapse of private demand, especially housing. The private sector’s financial surplus has surged; government deficits have risen in counterpart through the operation of automatic stabilizers, mainly revenue but also unemployment insurance and other safety-net programs.
…
In case you haven’t noticed, the multiple-asset bubble of 2006-7 is back. Home prices are jumping at double-digit rates in all the usual places—like Arizona and Florida. Equity markets hit all-time highs, with S&P 500 (SPY) up 11.82 percent over the last quarter; and Dow Jones (DIA) and Nasdaq (QQQ) following closely behind. The US Treasury market continues to trade near record low yields, while precious metals ETFs like SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), and iSilver Trust (SLV) have been holding steady after their recent correction, not too far from their all time highs.
The only thing that is different this time around is that the air that blows into the bubble doesn’t come from securitization and subprime loans, but several rounds of QE by the Fed and overseas central bankers that have kept most interest rates near zero levels.
Not everyone subscribes to the multi-bubble reflation theory, however. In spite of their big comeback, home prices are well below their pre-crash highs. Equity valuations are still reasonable, with the S&P500 Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio slightly above its long-term average. And the overall economy continues to improve, especially the labor market. Bullish Wall Street observers would compare the current equity valuations to those of 1982, which marked the beginning of a prolonged bull-market.
The problem, however, is that in 1982 most interest rates were in double digit, due to tight monetary policy in the preceding years. This meant that interest rates had nowhere to go but lower, as the Fed began easing to fight the recession, giving a big boost to real estate and equity prices.
Now, the opposite is the case. Interest rates are near zero, and have nowhere to go but up, if the economy improves and inflation catches up with Wall Street.
In either case, the consensus is that asset prices have further to go. This means that chances favor investors on the long side of the market—bubbles can be very rewarding for investors, provided that they catch the train early and leave at the right time.
…
SAN LUIS OBISPO Calif. (MarketWatch) — It’s not complicated. Prepare all you want. But the bull ends. The market sinks deep into its third bear of the 21st century. Wall Street loses another $10 trillion of our retirement money.
Banks again get bailed out by clueless politicians. Their CEOs pocket new bailouts, splitting with the Super Rich. The recession goes on for a few years, again. Growth slows, austerity increases with unemployment and Fed rates.
That’s the relentless economic cycle. Predictable for eight centuries.
But “it’s not complicated.” That’s the message in the fab-u-lous ATT ads with those cute kids and their straight-man narrator all sitting in little chairs in a kindergarten classroom. Kooky kids. Yes, Ad Age says ATT’s hyping its brand in mobile networks:
“The kids’ imaginations turn boring brand attributes like multitasking or download speeds into loads of fun …. Case in point: Dizzy boy … is able to wiggle both his head and his hand at the same time. Or the precocious girl who notes that being fast is necessary to avoid being bitten by a werewolf. Or the kids in a new NCAA spot who discuss how to do two things at once in basketball, with the pickle roll.”
Werewolves of Wall Street, Washington will soon ‘turn’ America
Dizzy boy? Cute girl worrying about werewolf bites? The pickle roll in a basketball game? If you have an imagination, you already know the right answers. Yes, these kids remind me of the endless questions readers ask about what to do when the market peaks, as it always does, like now, in the fourth or fifth year of a bull market, then crashes.
An AT&T “kids” commercial.
It’s not complicated, folks. Focus on the dizzy boy, or the pickle roller, better yet, the precocious girl. Imagine, is she really worried about werewolves? Naw, she’ll roll with the punches. You should too.
Investing is not really complicated. Nor are your investment strategies that complicated. Limited yes. To four strategies. But when the market peaks, the bubble bursts, when you see it crash a couple thousand points, when you wake up to another recession and our clueless politicians are conned into bankrupting taxpayers again, bailing out Wall Street banks, again, and you’re wondering about your strategies, again … remember, “it’s not that complicated.”
You’ve been down this road before. This is the third time in this 21st century. You should be used to it by now. First the bear/recession after the 2000 dot-com crash dragged on for 30 very long, agonizing months, far longer than the nine-month average. Then the 2007-2009 bear recession also got agonizingly longer than usual.
Now the current bull is four years old, ancient by historical averages. So a new bear crash is a no-brainer.
Now what? Think like a 5-year-old kid … it’s not really that complicated
Seriously, you must be used to these painful cycles that Wall Street’s too-dumb-to-fail bankers and Washington’s dumb-and-dumber politicians keep subjecting American investors to. It’s not really that complicated. Our so-called leaders really don’t know what they’re doing. But get this, you do in fact know what’s best for you.
So let’s stop kidding ourselves, folks. Get real, this bull’s ready to do the pickle roll in the pasture. Think of the dizzy boy. And that precocious fearless little girl sitting in the small chair in kindergarten. Crashes? Bear market? Recession? They’re like her little fears of being bitten by a werewolf. She’d rather be a human: “It’s not complicated.”
…
Wealthy homeowners are increasingly asking their houses to earn their keep.
Lenders say a growing number of luxury homeowners are turning to a prerecession tactic of withdrawing equity from their homes. And just like during the housing bubble, many of these affluent borrowers aren’t using this cash to renovate their homes. Instead, they’re pumping it into investments, including the stock market, other real-estate purchases or even using the money to purchase art, which they expect will generate large returns going forward. In other cases, they’re choosing to use this cash to pay for their children’s college tuition or other expenses that they’d otherwise finance with higher-interest debt.
…
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
All of your base are belong to 0.1%
Great point goon…..so articulate.
Hello realtor.
JM, the “all of your base are belong to” phrase is an internet inside joke.
Busy weekend at Home Depot and Lowes?
Friday evening and Saturday, yes. Yesterday, no.
I am enjoying (very) slowly trying (and not quite succeeding) to improve the yard.
I stopped off at my HD twice this weekend to get mulch and annuals for my house and my in-laws. Parking lot was full around 1pm and again around 4pm on Saturday. First 60 degree day here in 2013 explains part of that, though. It’s usually only half full (largely contractors) but Saturday it was homedebtors. You can tell because of the confused looks when homedebtors come face to face with 14 varieties of insulation or 31 different hammer drills.
Contractors don’t frequent HomeCheapo.
Honest folk were out raking the yard Saturday. Now it’s snowing again. Set to bounce back up into the 60s. Time to launch the cabin cruiser pretty soon! Must get off land before the debt donkey cottagers migrate back.
Pimp, do you have any suggestions as to where to buy home stuff? Or could you tell me what, if anything, from Home Depot/Lowe’s is acceptable? Their lumber is probably not as good. But HBB had a huge discussion that hand tools like hammers are just as good. And plumbers tell me that the fixtures from Home Despot and Lowe’s, especially the higher end, are no different than you would get in any pro showroom. I visited four showrooms looking for a vanity and decided on one from Lowe’s. And really, how can you screw up mulch and annual flowers?
Contractors don’t frequent HomeCheapo ??
Thats the biggest lie that I have seen in quite sometime…Go look at the parking lot @ 6:30 AM and tell me who is shopping…Gee’s…What BS…
HD and Lowe’s carry mid range tools and materials. A professional would never shop there. An example: The new types of four
or eight foot florescent shop lamps look identical to those at the electrical wholesale house until you look at the ballasts. The ones
from HD or L’s are much smaller, noisier, less efficient, and can give you the high frequency
flicker effect. And the tools? All mid-range
in quality and price.
My local lumber yard in general carries higher quality tools than Low’s. Just my experience. They also have a price advantage on building supplies, if you have an account. They also deliver stuff for free. They also have lower prices on bulk fastners.
I see all sorts of contractors at my local HD, especially buying lumber.
They go wherever it’s convenient and they can get a good deal, when they’re buying materials. They may buy their personal tools from Snap-On or some such, but that’s not a daily purchase.
Well yeah, I live in the city, these contractors are the kind of guys needing relatively small amounts of supplies in a timely fashion, not their heavy duty tools. Lots of homes in my area get gutted out and redone one room or floor at a time and many of these contractors are small operators, not big remodeling companies. They may need a few pieces of dry wall or a bucket of thin set etc. Any morning at 6-7am it’s busy and the lot is 1/2 full of F350s, panel vans, and similar. Lots of these guys seem to pick up day labor (of the brown skinned variety) in the parking lot as well.
On weekends is when you see the homedebtors out in force. They seem to have no idea what they’re doing.
Homedebt is an addiction. Low’s is the porn shop.
And the tools? All mid-range in quality and price ??
Really…Hilti….Bosch…..Mid-range quality ??
@Blue Skye - I agree with you, I was just answering the question posed, whether or not HD in the area seems to be busy. Unfortunately, the answer is yes.
HD and Lowes don’t carry the same thing in all stores.
This applies to tools, colors of cabinets, etc.
The HD near me sells Bosch, Milwaukee, DeWalt, Hilti, etc. They also sell mid and lower level stuff like Ryobi.
Maybe where Rancher lives it doesn’t make sense (because of store volume) to carry so many brands?
HD in my area has a big advantage in terms of location - if you’re doing a job in Fells Point or Canton, you can be at HD in 5 or 6 minutes, whereas if you want to go to some specialty store it’s going to take alot [sic] more time.
The other “advantage” HD has is easy credit. Don’t have cash on you? Just give them your HD card or your phone number.
The other competitor with a similar location advantage is Grainger, but that’s on the other side of the harbor tunnel if you’re working in Canton/Fells Point (where the good reno jobs are). I also don’t think Grainger is as convenient as HD and it’s not geared towards the same type of work.
scdave, Hilti and Bosch might make a lower-end line for HD and Lowe’s. Sure it cheapens the brand value but money is money, right? The same thing happened to Calphalon cookware when they offered a cheaper line at Tar-jhay.
Blue, I’m tired of answering you.
Hilti and Bosch might make a lower-end line for HD and Lowe’s ??
I don’t think so…I have seen the full line of their tools at the international homebuilders shows…They are the same…
Lowe’s & HD target two segments…Sub-contractor and Mom & Pop homeowner…I am not sure which provides more revenue but my bet would be the contractor segment…
The time when Lowe’s or HD may not make sense is on large orders…Lets say 8 units of drywall or 6 units of studs…They are just not geared for that type of volume sale or delivery…
I understand Oxy, you don’t need to answer me.
The debt service though, tiring as it may be, you have to answer that. If I ever wished you any misfortune, I would have encouraged it.
Let me say it again so I’m clear.
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Do I need to say it again?
Here…
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Now…. let me ask. How many of you are contractors? How many of you execute $100 million or more of work a year? How about $10million? about $2 million? That’s right…. not a single one of you.
For my E contracts…. do you really think Home Cheapo junk meets spec? I’m here to tell you it doesn’t. And what is there is 2x the cost of a supply house. How about drop ins with battery backup? Get real. Go ahead…. go down to home cheapo and ask for a gasketed Quazite box. Report back to me your experience.
For P contracts….. Do you really think HomeCheapo has Terrazzo prec-cast shower pans? Really? Do you think Cheapo can provide something as simple as copper tubing for less than a supply house? They can’t and don’t. Supply houses are a fraction of the cost of Cheapo.
For structural and architectural IFS/EFS contracts…. do you really think you’ll find 18 gauge steel studs? And after I’m done waiting 2 weeks for Cheapo to source them and get them to my site, I’m going to pay them triple over what my competitors pay at a supply house?
Let me say it again for the benefit of the brainwashed housign junkies and ham and eggers….
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
Then they pay people to pretend they’re contractors, and to drive white work vans and the like, and to buy big batches of lumber there.
Or maybe you’re wrong.
Stop being a douche. You’re a builder or General Contactor, obviously you wouldn’t go to home depot. Plenty of small contractors, small businesses and subs shop at home depot. Key word here is small. Bobody was saying that All contractors shop there. Now before you say I don’t know what I am talking about I will let you know that I own a small business and I do shop there.
Get off your high horse…. Sheesh..
Here:
Contractors don’t frequent Home Cheapo
And you go to Cheapo because you’re not a contractor.
“The debt service though, tiring as it may be, you have to answer that. ”
Why?
“The debt service though, tiring as it may be, you have to answer that. ”
Why?
Unless you are wealthy or have inherited a house, you either pay rent to a landlord or you pay to rent money from the bank.
In some locations, the monthly costs are similar. The choice from there is based on your lifestyle, your career, your family, and your personal tastes.
And at current inflated asking prices of resale housing, paying rent is half the monthly cost of buying.
Pimp is being a douche. I laid out the kind of work these guys do, obviously it isn’t big projects or new construction.
Where’s the prestige in being a contractor, are we supposed to be impressed? Like oh wow they can get 5000 sheets of drywall at a lower unit price than I can get 25 sheets. Amazing!
you either pay rent to a landlord or you pay to rent money from the bank.
You left out (3) pay rent to the government (4) have someone else pay to house you or (5) sleep in a hollow log or cardboard box.
No… You’re backpedalling because you jumped in a conversation too early figuring I wasn’t going to back myself up.
A harpsichordist and part time barrister is now pretending to be a contractor. You go girl!
I buy some of the stuff from Erie materials for my building. They do deliver and have a helpful technical center. They designed and ordered a cricket for part of my torch down roof 2 years ago and it worked out quite well.
Electrical stuff from Greybar and the Heating/ Air conditioning stuff from Total Line
Where could I buy aluminum siding? I have some patching & panel revision to do, but no local contractor seems to be interested in using aluminum. Aluminum is what I mostly have & am satisfied with. All they want to do is a tearoff & installation of vinyl siding.
For God sakes grow a set and tell them what you want.
The Pimp knows everything. Haven’t you guys been paying attention?
We just happen to earn alot of money in the contruction biz. ALOT of money.
You? You pretend to know something about construction in order to make yourself and your housing junkie friends feel better about paying massively inflated prices. In the end, you’re suckers.
… and yet you whine about replacement alternators for honda civics, which can easily be had for about $100
And this isn’t about you pretending to be an auto mechanic either my Harpsichordist friend.
Quazite boxes are those boxes in your easements that electric utilities are buried in. Most contractors aren’t burying utilities and telco as part of their jobs; actual utility companies or specialized utility contractors do that in most parts of the country.
QZ’s are used for alot of things…. swimming pool pumps, site lighting, in lieu of valve boxes for sprinkler systems… so yes…. most contractors are burying utilities.
Did you price a QZ at Cheapo? It’s triple the price of a supply house. Did you get the turnaround time on it from Cheapo? 2 weeks. That’s 2 weeks longer than a supply house.
Contractors don’t frequent Cheapo
I have some patching & panel revision to do, but … all they want to do is a tearoff & installation of vinyl siding.
And that’s the crux of the issue, and it’s also why you see so many homeowners in Home Despot. It’s all about patching, repairing, switching out fixtures or moulding or plumbing, and landscaping or re-landscaping existing houses in the pre-1980 inner suburbs with decent commutes.
Big contractors aren’t interested in saving what’s still good. All they can do is rip down and/or start from scratch. So, enter the small outfits, handymen, and individual homeowners who do things themselves. Why is this a bad thing? Is it really so bad to be clueless? You have to start somewhere.
And this is why the residual value of a 20+ year old house is near zero.
Seems like a huge waste of money to use those boxes to bury $50 sprinkler system parts when a $15 plastic box will do equally well but I guess you are trying to make some kind of a point. Lawn mowers can be heavy I guess…
I think it’s you that’s attempting to make a point. You’re not doing a very good job of it.
Thanks Oxide. I appreciate your clarification. JM
Jingle,
Tell us about Lucky Ducky call center jobs in Sacramento and how that’s going to drive a sustainable rebound in Cow Town home prices.
I’m all ears.
—Tell us about Lucky Ducky call center jobs in Sacramento….—-
“Sacramento ranks among fastest-growing cities for tech jobs …”
“When thinking of tech hubs, Silicon Valley, San Francisco or Seattle all spring to mind. It’s unlikely that many people think that places like Sacramento, Houston or Kansas City are tech-oriented, but a new report suggests the fastest-growing cities for tech jobs may be in those places, and not just in well-known industry centers……”
http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2012/03/15/top-fastest-growing-cities-tech-jobs.html
I’m heading over to the realtor’s office today and going to look into acquiring a condo near the local plastics plant.
Buy two condos. And hurry! They’re not making any more land. And interest rates are at historic lows. And real estate always goes up. And 1,000 people a day are moving to Florida, Atlanta, the Sacramento suburbs, Queen Creek AZ, et cetera. HURRY!
In just a few months, you will be able to flip them to an all-cash Canadian or Chinese investor.
Sacramento is a hot hot hot market. Not much land out there, very educated work force, lots of 6 figure jobs. BUY BUY BUY.
Also, CA is always going to be able to subsidize real estate via its locked-in property taxes. And the state isn’t having any budget problems, so buy buy buy. Stockton was an anomaly, most CA counties and towns are fiscally responsible.
Not sure if serious…
’twas sarcasm directed at the NARscum shills on this blog.
Everybody knows Sacramento is HOT, but if you had to pick between Modesto or Fresno, where would you choose? Everybody wants to live in Modesto or Fresno (or Bakersfield, too). Pack up the U-Haul today! And HURRY!
Hmmm… AAPL is going to locate a server farm in Fresno so that’s tempting, definitely going to be thousands of good long term jobs from that. On the other hand, Amazon is going to open a warehouse in Bakersfield. Oh, and there’s a Wells Fargo call center coming soon to SacTown.
So many touch choices.
Bakersfield, Stockton, Fresno.
Who knew that CA had THREE armpits?
I forgot Modesto and Chico.
Pack up the U-Haul today!
An oldie but goodie! Ah, the memories! Imagine you’re some middle manager tiring of your flyover life and just want to junk it all and strike it rich in RE:
17′ U-Haul from Indianapolis to Bakersfield: $1301
17′ U-Haul from Bakersfield to Indianapolis: $2699
living in the Sac area I find this thread hilarious…
“I forgot Modesto…”
That would be the bunghole.
LMAO at this thread. Don’t forget Manteca (lard) and Los Banos (the bathrooms).
Check the calendar.
The need for that clarification is very strong evidence that the bubble lives!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n5pd9eKapY
Here ya go, Bill in LA:
Cyprus President’s Family Transferred Tens Of Millions To London Days Before Deposit Haircuts
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/31/2013 15:11 -0400
A day after former Cypriot President Vassilou was found to be among many elite Cypriot (politicians and businessmen) who had loans written-off by the major (now insolvent) banks; it appears the rot is far fouler than expected. In a somewhat stunning (or purely coincidental) revelation, ENETEnglish reports that Cypriot newspaper Haravgi claims that current President Nicos Anastasiades’ family businesses transferred ‘dozens of millions’ from their Laiki Bank accounts to London just a week before the devastating depositor haircuts were unleashed upon his people. Of course, the denials are loud and Anastasiades has demanded an investigation into the claims; we are sure the government-selected ‘independent’ committee will be as thorough as the Libor anti-trust investigators. As a reminder, as we noted yesterday, here are Cyprus’ gun control laws.
…
It’s GOOD to be the insider!
Yep—there’s nothing like a crisis to aid in pretending to help the people, while actually shearing the sheeple.
Also, it is another example of the billionaires eating the millionaires. When Obama talks about millionaires and billionaires it is absurd to lump them into the same category. Instead of going after billionaires that are the real beneficiaries of globalization, countries are destroying millionaires which are the small business people that actually employ people within their countries.
<”Yep—there’s nothing like a crisis to aid in pretending to help the people, while actually shearing the sheeple.”</I.
It’s even better when you manufacture the crisis!
“millionaires and billionaires it is absurd to lump them into the same category”
Yup. Like lumping thousandaires and millionaires together.
“It’s GOOD to be the insider!”
Oh come on…they just have better intuition; sort of like Hillary the stock picker.
It was cattle futures, but don’t let 20 years interfere with you talking points.
‘It’s GOOD to be the insider!’
See you at the party, victor!
So who would you shoot if the bankers took all of your money ala Cyprus?
Who would you shoot if you had a forbidden hand gun and lived in Cyprus?
Would shooting someone get your money back?
Who would Jesus shoot?
Cyprus Collapse Triggers Unintended Consequences
Submitted by Monetary Metals on 04/01/2013 03:04 -0400
Some people believe that by imposing losses on investors and reducing the Cyprus banking system liabilities, the European powers have addressed the problems in Cyprus (if harshly). Others think that it was just an unjust tax on depositors. I have written about the sequence of events. Cyprus banks borrowed money and bought Greek government bonds. Greece defaulted, imposing big losses on bondholders. Cyprus banks postponed marking down their losses. Now, they have to mark those losses and admit that they are insolvent. This triggered a run on the banks. Now, finally, shareholders, bondholders, and depositors are taking their losses. The government of Cyprus and the “Troika” did not provide enough money to pay everyone.
Within Cyprus, there is now uncertainty about remaining deposits, capital controls, and the solvency of the Cyprus government itself. Elsewhere, the focus turns to other countries (e.g. Slovenia) where markets are becoming jittery that the same thing could happen.
…
People probably still don’t believe me, but this is why I think 401k’s and IRA’s are risky if your retirement horizon is more than 20 years. They’re a huge pool of potential revenue for the government. People say “well the government would never do that”. Haha, prior to 2008 I never thought our government would have such a ridiculous TARP plan. Prior to 2013 I never thought the EU/IMF would force bank depositors to take haircuts as a prerequisite to a bail out.
At a minimum we’re going to have some kind of means testing. Any decent sized IRA/401k will be vulnerable. And decent probably means a small amount, maybe 50k-100k.
Look at the depositors in Cyprus. 100k euros is a looooong way from being wealthy. But those people have to pay for the casino-like kleptocracy that is the .01%.
It is still a good idea for the complex paranoid to keep a reasonable 401K account active. They won’t take what they can’t find, but why make it obvious that there is anything to look for…..
I do a 401k up to the extent there is an employer match. That’s a 100% return on the money, so even if the gov’t takes a big chunk I come out OK.
Later on in life, you can contribute the max to get the match and then disburse the original contribution back to yourself. That’s a pretty good return too.
When your only tax shelter as a wage slave is a 401k, you max it out regardless of match.
We’re not allow entry into the lucrative tax shelters.
I thought that the Cyprus haircut was voted down, wasn’t it? What was appalling was the very suggestion of it.
If 401K’s are so risky, where do you suggest people put retirement money? Remember, HBB forbids us from working toward a paid-off house.
Saving for retirement isn’t much of a concern until one works their way out of debt. Working toward paid off debts is encouraged.
I thought that the Cyprus haircut was voted down, wasn’t it?
Your home’s keeping you busy.
Homeowners are a great source of “revenue” for the local governments and their financial mismanagement.
I thought that the Cyprus haircut was voted down, wasn’t it? What was appalling was the very suggestion of it.
It was ‘voted down’ in that it was removed for the first 100,000 euros in an account. For accounts higher than that, it was increased, with some estimates saying it will be as high as 60%.
The rumor is the big rich got their money out with their crony-connections, but local businesses and retirees are screwed.
The bankster is not your friend.
rumor
Yup. It’s all a rumor. Nothing to see…your money is safe…..
http://sigmalive.com/news/local/38012
The rumor is the big rich got their money out with their crony-connections
Before the rumor, there would have been an entirely reasonable assumption that cronies would have gotten the word well ahead of time & acted to save themselves, an assumption based on history & knowledge of human nature.
People say “well the government would never do that”.
1933
Gold
People say “well the government would never do that”.
1933
Gold
You left out “every bank in the entire country was closed”
Why didn’t the people use thier guns?
If Jesus shot anyone it would be the money changers. The only act of violence by him in the Gospels was directed at them by over turning their tables at the Temple and driving them off with a whip if I remember correctly. I say the banksters are the modern day money changers.
Great link concerning the temple and money changers:
http://christianpf.com/why-did-jesus-drive-the-money-changers-from-the-temple/
I would not put anything past the government.
Given the number of private pension plans that are going away and being replaced by 401k type plans, I find it very hard to believe that they are going to raid them. They will be just as difficult to raid as public pensions are today.
I think we’ll see a VAT first–an indirect way to raid retirees.
EUROPE NEWS
March 29, 2013, 7:19 p.m. ET
In Cyprus, Goods Hit a Bottleneck
By JOE PARKINSON and NEKTARIA STAMOULI
LIMASSOL, Cyprus—A multicolored stack of shipping containers stuffed with goods intended for Cypriot stores towered over this island nation’s largest seaport—a monument to the country’s financial paralysis.
In normal times, thousands of tons of cargo speed through the sprawling complex here every week, feeding Cyprus’s import-hungry economy. But with the country’s banking system on life support, the cargo network has shuddered to a halt.
“This is the artery of the economy and now nothing can move through here because no one’s sure they’ll get paid,” dockworker Marios Theodosiou said, as a huge crane moved another steel container into the holding area.
Many suppliers, wary of accepting letters of credit from Cyprus’s troubled banks, which reopened for business on Thursday after being closed for nearly two weeks, have refused to release the containers for anything but cash. The result: Some goods are starting to disappear from shop shelves.
Cash-starved businesses across Cyprus are counting the costs of the prolonged bank shutdown and of new capital controls aimed at keeping funds in the country. Unable to pay suppliers, many stores have opted to close until things improve. While banks reopened—allowing cash to return to the economy from depositors who can withdraw up to €300 ($390) per day—it isn’t clear how long it will take before funds and credit again flow freely through Cyprus’s banks.
With perishable goods such as fruit and vegetables running low, some Cypriots have begun to stockpile essentials, such as baby formula, tinned food and olive oil. Almost everyone is trying to hoard cash.
“The market right now is a time bomb ready to explode,” said Stefanos Koursaris, head of the Cyprus Small Business Confederation. The full costs, he said, will become apparent only in the days and weeks ahead. “Then businessmen will realize how big their losses are.”
…
Watch out for members of BB’s fan club to attack this guy for raising legitimate concerns about the sustainability of the debt bubble.
Bloomberg News
Stockman Warns of Crash Of Fed-Fueled Bubble Economy
By Richard Rubin on April 01, 2013
The U.S. economy is in a bubble inflated by “phony money” from the Federal Reserve and will burst within a few years, warned David Stockman, who was budget director for President Ronald Reagan.
In an essay published yesterday in the New York Times (NYT), Stockman wrote that the Fed’s quantitative easing policies in the aftermath of the credit crisis have flooded stock markets with cash even while the “Main Street economy” remains weak. The combination, he wrote, is “unsustainable.”
“When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008,” wrote Stockman, a former senior managing director at Blackstone Group LP (BX) and a former Republican congressman from Michigan. “Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today’s feeble remnants of economic growth.”
…
And if you want to read the other side:
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2013/03/david-stockman-goes-way-way-over-the-top.html
‘David Stockman Goes Way, Way Over the Top’
The wingnut of the day award is easy to pick, it’s David Stockman:
Cranky Old Men, by Paul Krugman: … Actually, I was disappointed in Stockman’s piece. I thought there would be some kind of real argument, some presentation, however tendentious, of evidence. Instead it’s just a series of gee-whiz, context- and model-free numbers embedded in a rant — and not even an interesting rant. It’s cranky old man stuff, the kind of thing you get from people who read Investors Business Daily, listen to Rush Limbaugh, and maybe, if they’re unusually teched up, get investment advice from Zero Hedge. Sad.
David Stockman Goes Way, Way Over the Top, by Jared Bernstein: He has a featured piece in today’s NYT which, while about 11.8% absolutely and totally on target, is mostly a horrific screed, an ahistorical, dystopic, Hunger-Games vision of America based on debt obsession and willful ignorance of macroeconomics and the impact of market failure. …
David Stockman wants to pee in your cornflakes, Kids Prefer Cheese: Wow. David Stockman confuses cause and effect, goes all gold-buggy, slanders Milton Friedman, and just generally comes unhinged in a massive hissy fit in today’s NYT. …
Update: See also David Henderson’s “David Stockman Screeches.”
Posted by Mark Thoma on Sunday, March 31, 2013 at 11:33 AM in Economics,
other side
You mean the wrong side?
cranky old man stuff, the kind of thing you get from people who read Investors Business Daily, listen to Rush Limbaugh, and maybe, if they’re unusually teched up, get investment advice from Zero Hedge.
Tyler Durden isn’t edgy anymore? But he’s on the internets!
I keep this one bookmarked:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVof0qj7SOw
That anyone touts either Stockman or Krugman is laughable.
I’m not saying you believe/follow either one, polly, but both of these guys are nuts.
Correct, Stockman is a hack. Krugman is a brilliant academic but should not be taken as a final authority on political/policy decisions.
Brilliant academics have a long history of making spectacularly wrong predictions about what will happen in the real world.
Brilliant academics have a long history of making spectacularly wrong predictions about what will happen in the real world. YOU CAN SAY THAT AGAIN.
28 March 2007: “At this juncture . . . the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime markets seems likely to be contained,” Ben Bernanke said in prepared testimony to Congress’ Joint Economic Committee.
Their arguments are still worth listening to, because it can cause you to revise your own ways of thinking. Few people would really want to live in what the left or right consider a “utopia”. Moreover it is not practical. The point stands that Krugman has a Nobel for a reason and this is nearly entirely separate from whether we should adopt his recommendations into policy. Saying he is wrong about “everything” would be spectacularly ridiculous. Much of Krugman’s academic work is now widely accepted across the spectrum when it comes to international trade, much like academics accept much of the work of Milton F, John M. Keynes, etc. It doesn’t mean they want it as policy. And, FWIW, we’ve never really adopted *any* of these folk’s pure ideas into policy. It would’ve actually been an amazingly good thing if Greenspan had pulled his head out of his Ayn Rand-stuff ass and raised interest rates when the economy was strong to slow down the buildup of credit/leverage. It wouldn’t been amazing if Congress had paid down the debt/balanced the budget rather than have Medicare Part D. But when people talk about Keynesianism being disproven, they have no f’ing idea what they’re talking about.
The only position I’m taking is that to your average voter, these academics mean nothing beyond what the cable news show shorthand says. We shouldn’t “follow” Keynes or Krugman but we also shouldn’t “follow” Adam Smith or Ayn Rand, etc. We should realize the underlying assumptions they make and the limitations of their writing for our real world situations.
We should realize the underlying assumptions they make and the limitations of their writing for our real world situations.
The electorate should work to understand its real world situation. This is not currently the case & doesn’t seem likely to happen. Meanwhile, on with the show!
‘when people talk about Keynesianism being disproven, they have no f’ing idea what they’re talking about’
Well, we’ve had lots of deficit spending the last few years and unemployment hardly budged.
‘the limitations of their writing for our real world situations’
It’s hard to “disprove” ideas like fake space alien invasions and digging ditches and filling them back in, because it’s so dumb nobody will ever try it.
“Their arguments are still worth listening to, because it can cause you to revise your own ways of thinking.”
Listening to these highly-touted academicians blather on about the real world as though they own a crystal ball which can accurately predict the future or have policy levers to pull which can make their fantasies come true has led me to drastically revise downward the faith I put in their statements.
We haven’t tried Keynesianism because we did not pay down debt, run a surplus, raise interest rates, or control credit when the economy was good. Instead, we aimed for even lower levels of unemployment by continuing to juice the market. We were at unemployment levels that were too low.
We also placed far too little emphasis on education and young people, continuing to confer benefits to the older generations in terms of Med. Part D, juiced up pensions, and lower taxes on capital gains. So basically we spent money that should’ve been used to bolster our future and instead plowed it into nearly-retired or fully-retired people. Very ineffective.
We really did not. We also did not have enough productive infrastructure spending in ‘08-’09 because we were fighting no one but TWO idiotic decade-long wars.
And again, I’m not saying we should adopt any policy wholesale. But it’s a lie to say we tried Keynes’ ideas. We *barely* tried deficit spending, but as noted above it was very limited in its effectiveness because the economy was already running on deficit spending, much of which was directed at unproductive things like transfer payments to old people and nation-building/wars in other countries. Idiotic.
‘We also did not have enough productive infrastructure spending in ‘08-’09 because we were fighting no one but TWO idiotic decade-long wars’
No, no. To Keynes, war is good. Remember how WW2 got us out of the great depression? It wasn’t true, but that’s what they say. And this is why Krugman thinks a fake space alien invasion would do the trick today; we would borrow and spend like crazy to keep Marvin the Martian from shooting down the Blue Angels.
‘We haven’t tried Keynesianism because…it was very limited in its effectiveness because…’
If a theory can’t be put into practice, what good is it?
If a theory can’t be put into practice, what good is it?
yes, but it’s even worse than that. it’s true it can’t be put into practice because no one can accurately predict up turns and down turn or how long they will last. so it simply can’t ever be done.
the second point is that, even if it could be done it would be detrimental to the economy. money that’s taken out of the economy to accomplish some type of keynesian demand management (public works), will never been used in more productive businesses that are guided by market oriented capital allocation. (the money gets spent in the wrong places)
in short, it’s a disastrous idea from beginning to end.
I haven’t read the Stockman rant or any of the responses yet. I saw that Mark Thoma had collected some responses in one of his top posts and thought that it was worth providing the links. And, in case none of you have noticed, Stockman is plugging a new book, so anything he puts out there that looks like it might be intended to get a lot of free publicity? It is.
Stockman’s been saying these things for years. Youtube is full of his rants. He’s just getting around to the book circuit.
And from the early 2000’s through 2008 while the bubble expanded we were told that there was no bubble and we didn’t have any facts.All one has to do for a dose of reality is look at the number of people out of work and the wages of those working vs. the cost of necessary goods including rent or mortgage.
Notice how Krugman starts off with an ad hominem attack, instead of sticking to principles in his critique? The subtext of the message is “Stockman is not in my club; therefore he can’t possibly be right.”
Notice how Krugman starts off with an ad hominem attack
Kind of like this?
Well, to be quite honest, I had already seen Krugman’s anti-Stockman piece when I mentioned that.
They said the same things about Stockman when he called out his boss, Reagan, for starting this mess thirty years ago. He was right back then, too….
And there’s a very good book that he wrote. Called The Triumph of Politics. Read it, says your HBB Librarian.
The mess did not start until we started to believe that forcing interest rates down with the unlimited printing of money was good policy. Greenspan started to do that during the Clinton administration, he was reasonably tight before that. So tight that he actually caused Bush I to lose. Now, we do not want to do without our bubbles.
Greenspan started to do that during the Clinton administration,
LOL. Try to keep it straight, even if it causes cognitive dissonance:
Volcker was appointed by Carter.
Reagan fired Volcker, and replaced him with Greenspan.
Alpha try reading the post. Greenspan did not start his easy money routine until Clinton and was reappointed for it. I never said he was first appointed under Clinton.
And Greenspan “supplied liquidity to the markets” the day after Black Monday, initiating the policy that has been known ever since as the Greenspan Put.
P.S. I disagree with Investopedia dating the term to the 1998 LTCM bailout, as the policy was in force already in 1987.
Oops- sorry Dan. Guess it was my own cognitive dissonance there;)
There is a big difference between adding liquidity for a few days and following policies that keep interest rates below inflation for a protracted period of time. That did not begin until after Bush I left office. Also, Reagan was out of office by 1989 and Greenspan was not appointed to 1987, the Reagan recovery had nothing to do with Greenspan. Reagan inherited an economy with high inflation, interest rates and unemployment and they were all fixed by 1987. It is not his fault that others did not alter policies that needed to be altered to address different problems. Obama inherited an economy with too much debt and has added to it. Had he passed a version of Simpson/Bowles and put us on a path to a balanced budget, I would not have a problem with a 2% growth economy. The next president gets a problem bigger than he inherited. The economy had stabilized by the Summer of 2009 before any of his policies had even gone into effect in any meaningful way.
Here is strong evidence that Investopedia’s dating is off by over a decade:
Black Monday and the Greenspan put
By James Saft
Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:11pm EDT
(Reuters) - The big milestone this week is not the 25th anniversary of the Black Monday crash but falls a day later when we mark the far darker advent of the Greenspan put.
The Greenspan put, the now long-established policy of easing and appeasing when markets go cold, arguably created the world in which we live - one of low growth, bubbles and, every once in a while, huge busts.
On Monday, October 19, 1987, the U.S. stock market crashed, along with falls in Asia and Europe, culminating in a 22 percent tumble in the Dow.
The exact causes are still in dispute, but currency tensions played a role, as did proposed legislation to take away some of the tax advantages of high-yield merger financings.
Margin calls, as ever, exacerbated falls, as did a then-new phenomenon, the program trade, which helped to drive volumes to then stratospheric levels and gave rise to a feeling that the machines had taken over.
Into the breach stepped Alan Greenspan, just months into an 18-year tenure as chairman of the Federal Reserve. Early the following Tuesday, the Fed came out with a statement, one which will seem very familiar to those who participated in the other crashes, panics and simple malaises which have been the defining financial feature of the past 25 years:
“The Federal Reserve, consistent with its responsibilities as the nation’s central bank, affirmed today its readiness to serve as a source of liquidity to support the economic and financial system.”
…
Quote from Stockman’s upcoming Book;
Stockman’s analysis skewers Keynesian spenders and GOP tax-cutters alike, showing how they converged to bloat the welfare state, perpetuate the military-industrial complex, and deplete the revenue base—even as the Fed’s massive money printing allowed politicians to enjoy “deficits without tears.” But these policies have also fueled new financial bubbles and favored Wall Street with cheap money and rigged stock and bond markets, while crushing Main Street savers and punishing family budgets with soaring food and energy costs. The Great Deformation explains how we got here and why these warped, crony capitalist policies are an epochal threat to free market prosperity and American political democracy.
How does he know that there will be no more bailouts? Does he have inside info, or maybe he knows/believes that Dodd-Frank will prevent a bailout.
Zero-sum austerity is not going to work…. not when the Big Boyz ran up trillions of *poof* money on the global credit card by jacking off with credit-default swaps and microsecond trading. Austerity might be able to manage debt backed by physical assets, but J6P doesn’t have enough assets — and can’t create assets (labor) fast enough — to offset all this *poof* sh!t.
He means that the next crash will be so spectactular that even a huge bailout won’t be enough.
Stockman raises a legitimate question, unfortunate Stockman is also a hack. So it’s a difficult situation where you can’t rely on Stockman alone. I’m not saying he’s wrong, but rather that he’s not the best messenger for this message.
For the most part, all money is phoney money.
So what else is new?
And it is borrowed into existence! (Hey there, Darrell!)
The Fed’s interventions are like a drug with heavy side effects. They have some positive effects, but they have negative effects too.
The concern I have is that Krugman et. al. completely ignore the negative side effects.
Eventually those side effects are going to come to the forefront. I think that’s what Stockman is talking about.
“Eventually”?
So Neuro, when you are thinking about the side effects coming to the forefront, how long do you think we have?
My gut tells me that we have 2-4 years…maybe, before we see higher rates (inflation and interest). I don’t think we will see decades of low rates (like in Japan).
Keystone and Breckenridge looking west from the top of Loveland Basin:
http://www.picpaste.com/IMG_20130331_100512_208-iIYsfENe.jpg
Grays Peak and Torreys Peak looking east from the top of Loveland Basin:
http://www.picpaste.com/IMG_20130331_100531_045-1EyjTRbD.jpg
that looks fun, well worth half a tank of gas.
Much less than that actually, the Civic averaged 38.6 miles per gallon there and back yesterday.
Getting back from any of the resorts west of the tunnel (Breck, Keystone, Copper Mtn, Vail, Beaver Creek) usually means sitting in 1+ hour of stop and go traffic just to get to the tunnel. That burns ALOT of gas, and is just No Fun at all.
I’ve only ever skiied places with lifts; do you just hike to the top of a peak and ski down? I feel so sheltered by comparison. Plus we only have girly-man mountains on this coast.
Loveland ski area sits on top of the Eisenhower/Johnson Interstate 70 tunnel, and sat there years before the tunnels existed. The high chairlift goes all the way to the ridge, and from there you can traverse (or ride the snowcat when it’s running) to drop into the basin from points along the ridge.
Our experience with backcountry skiing is limited as of now. And the gear for it gets expensive (you will spend ALOT of money), because in addition to skis you need an avalanche beacon. Add up all of the costs associated with this sport/hobby and theyar are Incalculable.
Hey goon, check this out: backcountry.com now has the ABS Avalanche Rescue Kit on sale for only $755.44! At that price you can snap up two of them. Buy now or be priced out forever.
Hmmm I think I will stick to the comfortable, if boring, confines of ski resorts.
After a few more decades of climate change, there won’t be any skiing in the East any more.
I probably only half a little over 2 decades left to ski, having a broken hip at 50+ does not sound like a good deal. I’ve taken some bad wipe outs over the years, a 50+ version of myself would probably be laid up for weeks.
Even though we have wimpy girlyman mountains in the east, bc of the warmer temps you mention, it is often icy at night on the slopes. Much less powder than you guys have out west. Alot [sic] less.
After a few more decades of climate change, there won’t be any skiing in the East any more.
If we have a few decades with no sunspots, you will need cross country skies just to get around town during the Winter. If we are the end of the interglacial warming period that will soon be year around.
Nice Pic’s Goon….Clear sunny day also…
Nice pictures Goon. Joe, I am skiing every week at 70 and have a 66 year old racing instructor. Oldest racing team member is 93 with one at 91 ! Another instructor at 77.
I was waiting behind this guy who was talking to his friend about where they stayed when skiing Whistler. My friend and I guessed they each were about 55. They were 89 !
Goon, there are two things I would like to have. The ability to ski your western powder and the stamina to be able to do it.
I don’t consider this to be an April Fool’s joke. For starters, the book release is on April 2.
Opinion
State-Wrecked: The Corruption of Capitalism in America
Mark Pernice
By DAVID A. STOCKMAN
Published: March 30, 2013
GREENWICH, Conn.
The Dow Jones and Standard & Poor’s 500 indexes reached record highs on Thursday, having completely erased the losses since the stock market’s last peak, in 2007. But instead of cheering, we should be very afraid.
Over the last 13 years, the stock market has twice crashed and touched off a recession: American households lost $5 trillion in the 2000 dot-com bust and more than $7 trillion in the 2007 housing crash. Sooner or later — within a few years, I predict — this latest Wall Street bubble, inflated by an egregious flood of phony money from the Federal Reserve rather than real economic gains, will explode, too.
…
Why buy in Vancouver when you can buy in Hollywood Hills for the same price and live in sunny Southern California instead of frigid Canada?
Vancouver Housing Bubble: Absurd Prices Highlighted
The Huffington Post B.C. | Posted: 03/06/2013 5:33 pm EST | Updated: 03/07/2013 12:41 am EST
Amid the weekly up and down reports on Vancouver’s housing market is one constant: a regular blog feature called “Absurd Vancouver Property” that highlights the city’s ridiculous property prices.
Melissa Carr aptly calls the section “Are you f*%#ing kidding me?” on her blog, the thirties grind.
Starting in March 2012, Carr finds eyesores, teardowns and just plain dumpy houses often selling for $1 million and up in Vancouver.
The reality is more astonishing when Carr compares what $1.7 million can buy — for example, this 2,700 sq.-ft., three-bedroom, five-bath Hollywood Hills home originally built for Charlie Chaplin and owned by Robert Downey Jr. …
…
“Why buy in Vancouver when you can buy in Hollywood Hills for the same price and live in sunny Southern California instead of frigid Canada?”
Because they’re idiots. The folks buying in Canada at 500/sq/ft make the morons down in FL standing in line for days to buy a pre-con condo look like Einstein.
instead of frigid Canada
Vancouver isn’t frigid. I think that’s one of its selling points. (I’d still prefer Charlie Chaplin’s old house in the Hollywood Hills, tho).
Frigid. No. But way too much rain! We spent our honeymoon up in that area last year, and, while we had a great time, it was truly a workout for our GoreTex!
Florida isn’t frigid either, and it’s 1/5th the cost.
Because they have “better health care?”
For-profit, private-sector, invisible hand of free market, American insurance company death panels = Freedom.
Socialist, communist, nanny-state Canadian death panels = Marxism.
Why? Because LA sucks?
Cause the need to own and nest is irrational? A few weeks ago SFHomeowner said one of her reasons to buy was not to have her life “on hold” any more. Did not have time to reply that day but what do you mean? I can see if you were in a place temporarily for work (I am and I don’t want to put too much efforts into putting down roots.) But since San Fran. will remain your home what difference does renting vs. owning make.
But since San Fran. will remain your home what difference does renting vs. owning make.
The cost of rent has gone up so much in the past 20 years that most people I know who have lost their apartments (usually owner-occupied move in when the place gets sold or they had kids and needed more than a studio or one bedroom anymore) have had to leave the city entirely.
A 2-bedroom in a decent neighborhood easily runs $2500 per month. Our PITI is less than that.
Our rental of 13 years was not rent controlled (single family homes are not covered). When our landlord raised our rent $200 month on December 24th and sent us a letter that we had to get rid of our chickens (she had happily accepted free eggs for the previous 4 years) and insisted we clean our garage coupled with crazy, drop-in “inspections” we decided that almost 30 years of renting was enough for us.
Had we been in a nice, rent controlled flat with a yard, we probably would have kept renting.
OK to be your own landlord.
We’re five years post crash w/no adjustment in sight. Or are you that certain this can’t be dragged out another decade? You do realize her house could be paid off before you even start looking, right? When her payments are taxes/maintenance only, yeah, she will look smarter than the renter.
Sorry, but I’m convinced these decisions are not one size fits all.
Owning can reduce uncertainty. As long as you can make the payments (including the taxes), you can continue to live in the same place - assuming a landslide or tornado or earthquake or eminent domain does not take out your residence.
When renting, you have the added uncertainty of the landlord selling or being foreclosed on. The acts of nature or government are still risks when renting.
what difference does renting vs. owning make.
Does nobody here look 20 years into the future? At all?
Yes. Do you understand that some of us don’t expect the financial results of the last 20 years to be duplicated in the next 20 years? Until the Fed stepped in I was almost certain of severe deflation. Now I don’t know what’s going to happen, but it’s still possible.
I see every decade I’ve been alive repeated.
Boom. Bust. Less jobs and less jobs that pay well. Blame the poor.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Carl, do you mean you’re not counting on house prices going up? Well, neither am I. But what I don’t get is that nobody here seems to acknowledge the value of a paid-off house regardless of the economy. The house has value even if the price stays at what I paid for it. And for someone like me, who will have no kids to move in with and annoy, when I can no longer work, the house will have value even if the price goes to 0! Sure, the house itself will deteriorate; we’ve all seen houses where seniors aged in place. But it’s a roof over my head.
Yes…but what if we get deflation to the point that your income goes down significantly well before it’s paid off? That’s what I’ve been expecting…
If you can pay cash for your house then we’re in total agreement.
Does nobody here look 20 years into the future? At all?
The future ain’t what it used to be.
At what point will a majority realize that real estate is a terrible investment?
Real estate is always a loss. Always.
Goon - good farmland isn’t.. It’s about 8k an acre in the Iowa-missouri region (up from about 5k/acre recently) and you can actually produce on it. Don’t forget that that is real estate also…
Land generally appreciates with either the rate of general inflation or, in odd situations, the value of the crop that can be grown on it. Land in rural areas has almost no value except for what it can produce for crop, which, 5-10K/acre is pretty reasonable. Land in urban areas no longer has any tie to crop value; however, it should, in general, mirror inflation.
There are broad exceptions to this, of course. However, in general, land does not depreciate (in the general sense of the word, however that’s not the same as “does not lose value”) and should, over time, appreciate about in line with inflation. Houses depreciate over time and require continual upkeep to maintain their value, land typically does not.
If you want to speculate in “real estate” land is, IMHO, the place you should do it. Much less expensive, and, if you happen to find the right spots, the returns can be breathtaking. Speculating with fully constructed houses is a game for bored housewives and husbands (real estate agents), not a game that the major investment money plays (although, recently, that no longer seems to be the case, but, IMHO, this is a temporary dislocation).
Rural land can also be a hedge against economic disaster. My grandfather became a full time farmer during the Depression.
Ditto for my grandparents. The story is that they had some business which went under, so they traded their last dime for a farmhouse and acreage and lived off the crops and livestock. You can live nearly cashless, which is a good way to live during a Depression. As they said, they couldn’t buy much, but they ate well.
Well, except for the guy who found $30 million worth of artwork in garage and basement after buying.
The right comparison here is percentage change:
(15/27-1)*100% = -44.4% year-on-year decline in percent of Canadians who say they are likely to buy a home in the next two years. In plain English, this is a collapse in the number of prospective buyers.
Canadians’ house buying plans drop sharply: RBC
By Jennifer Kwan | Pay Day – Tue, 26 Mar, 2013 6:25 AM EDT
A majority of Canadians are taking a wait-and-see approach when it comes to home purchases and plans to buy have suffered the steepest year-over-year drop in two decades, thanks to Ottawa’s move to tighten mortgage rules last summer, says a poll released on Tuesday by the Royal Bank of Canada.
RBC’s annual home ownership poll showed just 15 per cent of Canadians say they are likely to buy in the next two years, down from 27 per cent last year. The 12-percentage-point drop is the biggest year-over-year fall in overall buying intention as tracked by the poll, which has been conducted annually for the past 20 years.
“The more cautious mood this year is not surprising and is consistent with broader economic and industry forecasts,” Sean Amato-Gauci, senior vice-president, home equity financing at RBC, said in a statement.
An unseasonably warm spring, ultra-low rates and anticipation of mortgage rule changes may have led many Canadians to buy homes in the first half of 2012, said Amato-Gauci.
Last summer, the federal government implemented tighter mortgage rules — the fourth move in as many years — to calm the once-hot real estate market and limit the record levels of debt Canadians have accumulated in recent years.
Data earlier this month showed that home sales in Canada fell in February and the rate at which people amassed household debt slowed in the fourth quarter, adding to the pile of evidence that the stricter rules are filtering through.
Overall, 75 per cent of Canadians say that Ottawa’s move last summer will impact or delay prospective homebuyers from getting into the market.
At the same time, however, the poll showed nearly six-in-10 recent and prospective homebuyers say that a shortened mortgage amortization period to 25 years from 30 years had little to no impact.
Affordability is a key barrier
Despite the caution, 84 per cent believe that a house or condominium is a good investment.
…
What is the residual value of a 20 year old SFR?
hint: not much.
Basically worth the land it is built on less teardown and cleanup costs…
Yeah, the newer vinyl-sided POSs in the exurbs have little intrinsic value.
I would never recommend buying any house built in the last ~30 years, unless it was custom-built by a reliable builder (which you’ll only see in very rich areas). And even then, I wouldn’t buy one in the exurbs.
“Yeah, the newer vinyl-sided POSs in the exurbs have little intrinsic value.”
And houses older than that have none.
And houses older than that have none.
And here I am paying over $2000 a year in taxes on something with no value.
Can you report on ZIP 44223, specifically the area of the Falls around State Rd and Broad Blvd?
“And here I am paying over $2000 a year in taxes on something with no value.”
You have plenty of company.
It’s a big crater.
…. and growing ever deeper.
Would there be any big money to be made in urban / suburban home demolition? There seems to be a crying need for this.
How so?
I would never buy a house with vinyl or aluminum siding. Just shows a lack of taste. Quality is much more important than quantity and some shitbox in the ‘burbs with artificial siding is about as tacky as it gets.
I would never buy a house with vinyl or aluminum siding. Just shows a lack of taste.
Extravagant and unnecessary spending also shows a lack of taste. Ceterum de gustibus non est disputandum.
Vinyl, aluminum, clapboard, shakes, sandwich panels…. Houses depreciate rapidly no matter what it’s wrapped in.
And with 20 million excess empty houses with another 35 MILLION coming on the market as boomers head to the grave, it’s a long way to the bottom for housing. A very long way.
I would never buy a house with vinyl or aluminum siding. Just shows a lack of taste.
I’m imagining a harpsichord covered with it :-).
Well then, Joe, I am not good enough for you.
Don’t feel bad Oxide none of us are. Joe, my house is stucco so you should have a lot of fun with that. I also bought some bags of mulch for my backyard at HD since it is the store is near to my house. I just have Desert Willow trees and wild flowers and use red colored mulch to provide ground cover for the rest of the area. I think it looks nice and I use very little water, it adsorbs the monsoon rains without erosion and avoids blowing sand and soil during the wind storms. But I am sure you can find fault Joe, tell me how hillbilly I am.
Looks like the economy is improving.
So, is total U.S. debt going up again? Or have the highly paid geniuses at the top found some other source of demand that doesn’t involve them taking less of the pie?
Curse these naysayers who don’t believe the stock market and housing market will always go up, so long as quantitative easing continues indefinitely!
Stockman’s doomsday market scenario finds some detractors
April 1, 2013, 2:53 AM
Are markets really headed for the mother-of-all crashes?
So says David Stockman, ex-budget director for President Ronald Reagan. In a gone-viral op/ed piece for the New York Times on Sunday, the former Republican congressman from Michigan predicts that crash is a few years away and points the finger at easy Fed money flooding Wall Street and the weakening of the gold standard.
Stockman is the author of “The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America,” which is hitting the shelves April 2. The book tells how we have eroded from free-market economy into a managed one that operates for the benefit of a privileged few.
Stockman ends the four-screener NYT piece (at least from a PC), “Sundown in America,” with this cheery quote:
…
LOLZ, Professor Bear. We both posted the Stockman article in reply to this.
Economy improving? that’s a LIE.
Bloomberg: “The U.S. economy is in a bubble inflated by “Phony Money” from the Federal Reserve and will burst within a few years, warned David Stockman, who was budget director for President Ronald Reagan … Stockman wrote that the Fed’s quantitative easing policies in the aftermath of the credit crisis have flooded stock markets with cash even while the “Main Street economy” remains weak. the combination, he wrote, is “unsustainable.”
“When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008,” wrote Stockman … “Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today’s feeble remnants of economic growth.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-31/stockman-warns-of-crash-of-fed-fueled-bubble-economy.html
Real Estate
China Housing Curbs Kick In, So Why Are Stocks Up?
Published: Monday, 1 Apr 2013 | 4:23 AM ET
By: Rajeshni Naidu-Ghelani
Assistant Producer, CNBC
Mainland shares of property developers closed sharply higher on Monday despite the announcement over the weekend that Beijing and Shanghai will enforce the property curbs announced in early March.
The Chinese government has been trying to cool its red-hot property market and has called for stricter enforcement of a 20 percent capital gains tax on home sale profits and asked cities with fast property price increases to raise the down payment requirement and mortgage rates on second homes.
Michael Klibaner, head of research Greater China at Jones Lang LaSalle said property stocks are staging a relief rally, because the measures were not surprising.
On Monday, Shanghai-listed shares of major real estate counters were up over 2 percent with China Merchants Property Development gaining almost 5 percent, outperforming the benchmark that closed down 0.1 percent. Hong Kong markets were shut for a holiday.
…
Chinese exports to the US include sand and lead and at no charge, how can you beat the price?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
Cyprus money woes, Italian bank’s $4.1B loss bring new fears about Europe finances
Published March 31, 2013
FoxNews dot com
FILE- In this Tuesday, March 26, 2013 file photo, employees of the Bank of Cyprus shout slogans as they holds banners reading in Greek “shame” during a protest at Cyprus central bank in Nicosia, Cyprus. The moment word broke that Cypriot lawmakers in Parliament had voted down a bailout deal that would have raided everyone’s savings to prop up a collapsing banking sector, a huge cheer rose up from hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside that echoed through the building’s corridors. Many relished it as a kind of David-against-Goliath moment a country of barely a million people standing up to the will of Europe’s behemoths who wanted it to swallow a very bitter pill to fix its broken-down economy. (AP Photo/Petros Karadjias, File) (A2013)
Customers of an Italian bank have seen deposits fall by “a few billion euros” after a scandal in February, the bank announced Saturday.
According to Reuters, Monte dei Paschi bank reported a yearly loss of 3.2 billion euros ($4.1 billion) – a higher-than-expected net loss for 2012 – after loss-making derivatives trades at the lender amounting to 730 million euros. Bad loans also contributed to the loss.
The bank’s chief financial officer said after the earnings were released on Thursday that it was “quick in recovering ground in March” on the lost deposits in February.
The figures highlight the scale of the problems at Italy’s third-biggest lender, which received a 4 billion euro ($5.1 billion) state bailout last month, according to Reuters.
The news of Monte dei Paschi comes as a deal to rescue Cyprus banks from financial collapse has renewed fears about Europe’s shaky financial system.
…
Slovenia cuts growth forecast as bail-out fears grow
Fears that Slovenia will become the next eurozone nation to need a bail-out have been fuelled by a sharp cut to the country’s growth forecasts by the government’s economic institute.
Slovenia has become the first victim of contagion from Cyprus as its borrowing costs rocketed last week in the wake of a punishing bail-out deal. Photo: ALAMY
By Denise Roland
9:00PM BST 31 Mar 2013
Slovenian GDP is set for a deeper-than-expected 1.9pc contraction this year, compared with an earlier estimate of 1.4pc, according to official forecasts released on Friday.
Estimates of the recession-gripped country return to growth in 2014 were also slashed to 0.2pc, down from earlier predictions of 0.9pc.
The revised forecast brings government predictions in line with the IMF’s gloomier verdict that that the economy will shrink 2pc this year, the most in the European Union after Greece and Cyprus.
“Along with the worsening economic situation in the international environment, key elements for the decline will be the state’s continued fiscal consolidation and the rebuilding of the banking system,” said Bostjan Vasle, the institute’s director.
…
Spain’s Zombie Developments
By Bloomberg Photos - Mar 26, 2013 3:56 AM PT
Monumental Problem
Spain built 675,000 homes a year from 1997 to 2006, according to a report by a unit of Spanish savings bank Cajamar. That’s more than France, Germany and the U.K. combined. The frenzy resulted in a surplus of about 2 million empty homes that will take between seven and 13 years to absorb, according to Madrid-based property research firm R.R. de Acuna & Asociados.
The Development Ministry estimates there are around 700,000 new unsold homes in Spain and more than half of those are in coastal areas. The total number of empty homes in Spain is 3 million, according to a spokeswoman for the government who asked not to be identified by name.
Left, a statue of the parents of Francisco el Pocero, the builder of the Residencial Francisco Hernando housing complex in Sesena. El Pocero planned to build the biggest housing development in Spain, with 13,508 homes. Only around 5,000 were permitted to be built, however, and only 750 home buyers have registered so far.
…
The scariest housing bubble
China’s ‘ghost cities’ are raising fears of an epic crash with global consequences
by Chris Sorensen on Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:00pm
In Ordos, a city of 1.5 million in Inner Mongolia, there sits a mostly vacant district that was built to house and service another one million people, complete with huge public squares and museums. In Dongguan, more than 2,500 km to the south, the sprawling New South China Mall opened in 2005 to host an expected 70,000 shoppers each day, but remains mostly empty. Other so-called “ghost cities” are strewn across China.
When China’s economy was flying, such spending was little more than a curiosity, an inevitable by-product of a rapidly urbanizing country of 1.3 billion where construction investment accounts for nearly half of GDP. But these days, economic growth is slowing—the government is targeting 7.5 per cent this year, compared to more than nine per cent a few years ago—and all those empty apartments are beginning to look more sinister. Are they evidence of an epic real estate bubble waiting to burst, with global consequences, or just another relatively harmless sideshow of China’s centrally managed economy?
There’s little doubt that Beijing’s policy-makers are wrestling with an overheated property market. In a bid to clamp down on speculators who are driving up prices on units they don’t plan to live in, the government recently unveiled plans to introduce a new 20 per cent tax on profits from home sales, while raising down-payment requirements in certain cities. That, in turn, sparked a buying frenzy ahead of the new rules. In Beijing, home sales spiked 280 per cent during the first week of March, compared to the same period a year earlier. Adding fuel to the fire was a recent 60 Minutes report in which a reporter toured vacant development projects and interviewed Wang Shi, the chairman of Vanke, one of China’s biggest real estate developers. Wang said he believes China is currently in the grips of a real estate bubble and its burst would trigger an Arab Spring-like uprising. The stocks of several Chinese developers plummeted soon after the program aired.
The prospect of a housing downturn in China is not to be taken lightly. The sector has been called one of the most important in the world, influencing global prices for everything from lumber to iron ore. But experts say it’s a mistake to confuse a handful of vacant developments with the property market as whole. While empty buildings are a sure sign of overcapacity in some areas (some reports claim as many as 64 million apartments are unoccupied), big cities like Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzen continue to face a chronic shortage of housing, keeping prices up. It’s essentially the tale of two housing markets: China’s thriving coastal cities and sleepier inland centres the government is keen to develop.
…
It’s essentially the tale of two housing markets: China’s thriving coastal cities and sleepier inland centres the government is keen to develop.
So the ghost towns are in China’s “flyover” country?
In China it’s not “flyover”, it’s train-over. Excellent piece here:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/the-china-diaries/china-at-the-crossroads-of-renewal-and-breakdown/article10579845/
Does anyone see a problem?
Seismic Stabilization Bolts Snap On New Bay Bridge
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/03/27/seismic-stabilization-bolts-snap-on-new-bay-bridge/
Also beware the Tappan Zee bridge.
Ah, I just love the stench of turd world standards in the US. Yes, we can!
See also Washington Post piece “Crumbling Beltway epitomizes nation’s deteriorating roads”
Someone said let the DC Beltway crumble, that will teach all those Washington people.
Ummmm, not really.
Most top DC people live *inside* the Beltway and rarely drive on the Beltway. For example, Bethesda, Chevy Chase, Arlington, etc… all inside the Beltway.
As for the other bigwigs who live further out like Potomac or Burtonsville, they either a) don’t drive themselves, they have a car service b) they don’t drive at rush hours or c) they’re still not using the Beltway, because they come into town via another corridor.
The Beltway is used to go around the edges of DC, so it’s more useful to middle class or Lucky Ducky types who don’t work downtown.
Maryland also just finished the ICC (inter county connector) which has stiff tolls, which was discussed here last week. It’s basically a toll road for people who can afford $10/day to go just a few miles. They pay their $10 and get to drive 75mph while Lucky Duckies sit on the Beltway and go stop/start/stop/start all the way to their exit.
Single occupant vehicle = rugged individualist.
Public transportation = communist/homosexual.
Goon, what do you call a luxurios cross country private plane ride just for you and your family?
An Obama spring break family vacation?
they should have to ride the Greyhound bus. and while theyre riding the bus, they should have to sit in the Back Of The Bus, cus they were all like born in Kenya and sh*t.
All Presidents must be rich enough to fly their own planes to their own ranches.
I avoid the Beltway whenever I can which means I use it to get to two of the area’s three airports (if I can’t arrange my flights at a time to make public transportation an option) and not much else. Now, East-West Highway. Military Road and Wisconsin are an entirely different story.
An Obama spring break family vacation?
I was thinking an environmentalist.
Yours not that good but you still get a C.
East-West Hwy seems like a mess, but I’ve only been on the stretch between NH Ave and Baltimore-Washington Turnpike (295).
Wisconsin seems to run right through the nice parts of Bethesda, I bet they’ll keep that paved up nicely.
I don’t drive any of them during rush hour. E-W Highway is a pretty convenient road, but it is very hilly and has a lot of turns. Avoid at all costs if it is snowing or sleeting (however, that goes double for the Beltway). Shouldn’t be a problem again until next January. Or a year from January. Or two years from January. Etc.
Wisconsin/355 has had some attention recently. And I think they are going to add a sidewalk to the west side of the street through the part of Chevy Chase just south of Bethesda. They should. There are bus stops over there and they don’t line up with the stop lights. Exactly how are you supposed to safely walk from the bus stop to the next place to cross the street without a sidewalk? Maybe the country club originally blocked it because they didn’t want to be responsible for shoveling it in case of a snow storm?
“Crumbling Beltway epitomizes nation’s deteriorating roads”
The last of the world-class infrastructure built during the ridiculous wasteful Keynesian period is finally crumbling away, revealing how little we’ve invested in ourselves since we ‘wised up’.
Drove over this bridge a lot, had to go over this and the Tappan Zee bridge on the way to and from Pennsylvania most weekends when I was a kid.
Mianus River Bridge Collapse
photo credit: Hank Morgan / Time Life Pictures / Getty
accesed from the Time photo gallery here.
Location
The Mianus bridge supported the six-lane Interstate 95 where it crossed the Mianus River near Greenwich, Connecticut. You can see a satellite image of the bridge from Google Maps here: Mianus River Bridge. The latitude and longitude of the bridge are 41.0344670 and -73.5957600. You can learn more about the Mianus River on Wikipedia here.
History
The bridge was built in 1958 and collapsed in 1983, after 25 years of use. The Mianus River bridge used a “pin and hanger” design common to 1950’s era bridges (2). Pin and hanger designs had cheaper construction costs compared to other design options (2). A historic overview of the Connecticut Turnpike, “The Mianus River Bridge and its Legacy” can be visited here.
Details of the Collapse
On June 28, 1983, at 1:30AM, a 100 foot suspended span of the northbound section of the bridge collapsed, completely separating from the bridge and falling into the river (see photo above). Two tractor-trailers and two cars fell into the Mianus River. There were three deaths and three serious injuries.
http://35wbridge.pbworks.com/w/page/900718/Mianus%20River%20Bridge%20Collapse - 39k
Irony: how does it work?
Was this bridge the one they brought over from China?
Yup. But hey, I’m sure they saved a lot of money.
Bayou Sinkhole Update: Increased Seismic Activity, Access Ramp Caves In
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Bayou-Sinkhole-Update-Inc-by-Meryl-Ann-Butler-130328-19.html
There have been several incidents of brine storage caverns caving in swallowing entire towns in the LA, TX, OK regions over the last 4-50 years.
But honey badgers don’t care.
It’s the underground methane and butane under high pressure that is the greatest fear in Bayou Corne.
Wall Street Journal - Hiring Spreads, but Only 14 Cities Top Prerecession Level:
“Employers are hiring more readily across the U.S., though only 14 of the nation’s 100 biggest metrpolitan areas have more jobs now than they did before the 2008-2009 recession.
Six of them are in Texas …
Nationally, there were 3 fewer million jobs in February, or 2% less than when employment peaked in January 2008.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323361804578390823877463426.html
Well, by golly, just bring on the damnesty! That’ll fix it!
Yes, god knows we need more people that are dependent on government and drive down wages.
thats racis.
Linked from Drudge Report (love, love, love your Drudge links)
“More than two dozen teens were arrested Saturday night after dozens of groups began randomly attacking pedestrians on Chicago’s Magnificent Mile.
Police responded to reports of disturbances around 6:30 p.m. Saturday near Michigan and Chicago avenues. they said a number of teens took to the streets and started fighting.”
http://m.nbcchicago.com/nbcchicago/pm_107717/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=NGhHhQL2
It’s the “urban” youth at it again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJrbHapH5pM
Instead of: “endless mile” it should say “miracle mile”.
That’s kinda racist. They were probably a bunch of rich white kids who took the train down from Lake Forest.
Not really. This is the same story we read on Drudge Report last spring in Chicago. Warm weather officially opens up the season on ‘Haves’ for the ‘Have nots’.
After hibernating indoors all winter, the “youfs” are just unleashing some pent-up demand to go get some Justice For Trayvon or some sh*t.
And after the racis cops shoot one of those kidz, expect the media to give a quote from some fambly member about how he was “an aspiring rapper” who was “turning his life around” et cetera.
A mile of high-end shops and hoity apartments located three blocks from a ghetto is just bad manners — if not sheer stoopidity.
Could never understand the allure of that town….
Cabrini Green is long gone, ahansen. Gentrification has pushed the ghetto more like three miles from the Mag Mile. The misunderstood youths take the “L” downtown after getting flashmob notifications on their iPhones.
Don’t know how long it has been since you last visited Chicago. To me, it’s a beautiful city with many cultural draws, and great recreation along the lakefront. Doesn’t mean I want to live in the city; but I am glad to have it nearby.
Cant wait for the Thug Trayon pictures to surface at trial…..i heard they were nasty…if so Zimmerman wont have much to worry about
—-
After hibernating indoors all winter, the “youfs” are just unleashing some pent-up demand to go get some Justice For Trayvon or some sh*t.
Mag Mile my butt. I’ll just get the stuff online.
Was last on a walking tour of the city in 2006 when I abruptly found myself in chain link and cracked asphalt territory mere minutes from leaving the Prada shop. But I imagine seven years is plenty of time to gentrify an outskirt?
Visited briefly again in 2010 and the shore was teeming with people who did not look as though they’d just strolled over from RL Restaurant. The income disparities were striking, especially for someone coming from Outer Los Angeles where everything is less condensed and money is more dispersed.
What you do want to bet 90+ % of them are children of “single mothers” who are collecting some sort of federal benefits?
That’s racis too.
Because according to the cultural relativists, all types of parenting shall be considered equal, including non-parenting.
including non-parenting.
Cue Dione Warwick that’s what Jaaaaillllzzzzz are for.
When the parents are working 3 lucky ducky jobs, there is not much time for oversight of teenage behavior.
KEEEEEEEEEEEEEYRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASH!!!
What was that?!
You know that house you made the mistake of buying? Well the value of it just fell through the floor leaving a smoldering moon-crater.
Beware reading public. Beware.
1,000 people a day are moving to Cape Coral, Florida. Cape Coral real estate can only go up. They aren’t making any more land in Cape Coral. Interest rates are at historic lows. Only a licensed Realtor can guide you through the home buying process. Hurry!
These kidz need more meds. Only Big Pharma can save them:
“Nearly one in five high school age boys in the United States and 11 percent of school-age children over all have received a medical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder … These rates reflect a marked rise over the last decade and could fuel growing concern among many doctors that the A.D.H.D. diagnosis and its medication are overused in American children.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/01/health/more-diagnoses-of-hyperactivity-causing-concern.html?pagewanted=all
http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2013/04/lindsay-lohan-wanted-adderall-in-plea-deal-for-rehab—report.html
Just look what it’s done for Lindsay!
concern among many doctors that the A.D.H.D. diagnosis and its medication are overused in American children.”
It is. And while they’re at it, they should look into the fact that antibiotics are still prescribed for colds (all mislabeled as “sinus infections”) in the US- all the time.
We are way over-medicated, thanks to our great health care system.
thanks to our great health care system
No thanks to our wonderful doctors. Or should I say legalized drug dealers?
I’m not sure it is the doctors or the parents. Speaking with my children’s doctor over their ear infections (caused by a virus); she asked if we wanted something to treat it. I asked what it could be, her response was that almost all parents demand something be done, so lots of doctors just prescribe an antibiotic to get the parents out the door. The ear infection will likely clear on its own after a few days, so the parents are happy and an anxious parent is quieted down.
Parental ignorance is, in my opinion, the number one cause of the over diagnosis of ADHD and the prescribing of antibiotics for viral infections in children.
Or as a friend said: I don’t think my two boys have ADHD, I think I just have two young boys who’d rather be outside running around and exploring and learning about how the world works instead of learning to regurgitate some mundane fact on a multiple-choice test so the politicians can claim accountability.
Whatever happened to just being young, restless and bored?
It’s against the law.
No joke.
It’s not just the kids. Their parents, at least the women, are sometimes also medicated to the hilt. I’m seeing Xanax addictions in my circle.
God forbid the kids’ parents should provide discipline. Dope is so much easier. Another factor is the lack of physical actively. So many kids spend their play time on the computer.
“So many kids spend their play time on the computer.”
Aided and abetted by their moms…
Parents can be arrested for doing anything more than “time-outs”.
What kid in their right mind fears a “time-out”?
Here’s something I find interesting; we pretty much laugh off threats of nuclear attack from North Korea. But we threaten to attack Iran all the time even though they don’t have a nuke and if they did, couldn’t deliver it.
Because the U.S. Congress is Israeli-occupied territory?
There’s no bang for the bucks by threatening to attack NoKo.
Furthermore, every neocon’s legs gets tingly even with the though of bombing brown moosleems. Just ask 2Banana. I bet he’s already wrapped himself in red, white and blue.
These evil inversions are everywhere but nobody pays attention to them. Because of their simplicity?
Ben, I have been too busy to post, in fact most days even to peak at the blog, but I will bite on this one. Iran has the ability to cut-off the supply of oil from the Gulf and make gasoline go to $10 a barrel. It is active in working to spread its form of Islam in the region and is having some success. All North Korea can do is damage some of our competitors in the high tech space. It is having no impact in the region converting people to its views.
Thank you, dan. Miss ya, bro’.
Thank you Jose and that was peek not peak. Thinking of peak oil, perhaps. BTW, perhaps I should not start this since I do not have time to engage but here goes. Even the Economist Magazine is now questioning the amount of global warming caused between 1978-98. At one time you had the advocates attributing almost of it, now you have a lot of people saying 1/3. Remember I have consistently used 14%. Not bad for someone who does not have a Nobel peace prize. The question is now: can you really call co2 a pollutant if it is keeping the world from going into a mini-ice age? A question Europe in particular is asking the last few months.
90% of people are willing to believe the most illogical stuff if only told by a voice of authority. We are herd animals and thinking is too hard.
H2O is a much worse actor than CO2. More difficult to float a tax on that though.
Right. Because particulate matter from burning coal mixed with CO and CO2 is historically so conducive to human life.
Ten years ago when the “maybe-atmospheric-pollution-is-really-PROTECTING-the-planet” meme was first floated as a smart-ass response to science deniers in the US Congress, it was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. Why am I not surprised to see IPCC’s Rajendra Pachauri’s recent comments being misquoted by the Drudge brigade today?
While global surface temperatures may be in hiatus - for many reasons including those posited by Hansen’s paper — the rate of HEAT ACCUMULATION on earth has not slowed at all.
Graham Lloyd, (whose article being referenced here “The Australian” was forced to retract), is an oft-discredited hack for the American coal and oil lobby.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/australian-pachauri-global-warming.html
Right. Because particulate matter from burning coal mixed with CO and CO2 is historically so conducive to human life.
Coal mixed with co and co2? I do not even know what that means and neither do you. Coal is primarily carbon and when it burns it adds either o or o2 depending on how rich the air is in oxygen. Carbon in the air is very useful to plants, it is the other elements in coal that are the problem but they can be removed or reduced dramatically.
You can state that world is getting warmer over and over but it does not make it fact. Even according to James Hansen’s manipulated data the average of the first two months of this year is cooler than the average of temperature for 1998. 1998 .61C warmer than a base period, I think 1951-80 (off the top of my head) compared to .55C this year compared to the same base. We have been flat to down for almost two decades despite an increasing amount of co2 in the air. Completely contrary to predictions, which has just about everyone but you admitting that AGW was overestimated in the 1980s.
Here, I’ll make it real simple for you.
Burning coal produces carbon dioxide.When there is insufficient combustion, carbon monoxide is produced.(When carbon dioxide gas is passed over heated charcoal it forms carbon monoxide.) CO2 (g) + C (s) > 2CO (g). Which kills people, especially when it combines with low-lying fogs.
While global surface temperatures may be in temporary hiatus, the rate of HEAT ACCUMULATION on earth has not slowed at all. Approximately 90% of global warming goes into heating the oceans.
The first part is just saying what I said in a different manner and you should cite your source since I can tell it is a quote that you really do not understand since it is not what occurs in a coal power plant. In fact, it is two different quotes patched together.
As far as 90% of the warming going into the oceans that is more theory than fact. We do not know how enough data to know how warm the water was deep so we don’t know whether ocean warming that has occurred is due to uplift in the ocean or a warmer atmosphere. All we do know is the combined ocean and air measurements that we do have and have been taking since 1979 show no change in about twenty years and in fact we have a slight cooling trend in place. That may change radically over the next years if the predictions about a lack of sunspots is correct. You know when the predictions by the AGW crowd have some accuracy I might start taking them more seriously. 20 years ago we were told that children in Great Britain would never see snow by now and now they are buried by it.
Why are the ice caps melting then?
You’re right, dan, I don’t have a clue what goes on inside your head, but it’s certainly not science.
All North Korea can do is damage some of our competitors in the high tech space ??
And at the same time turn their country into an ash-tray…China needs to reign this little snot-nose in before it gets ugly…
If and when it is to China’s advantage to do so, they can squash their crazy little neighbor like a bug.
If and when it is to China’s advantage to do so
I wouldn’t be all that surprised if an NKor nuke detonated somewhere in China before one went off anywhere else.
And I think this is why North Korea gets a lot less direct attention from the US. We are relying on China to keep them under control and China has let our government know that unilateral action against North Korea is a bad idea.
If NK launches an attack, the dynamic may change in that part of the world.
‘Iran has the ability to cut-off the supply of oil from the Gulf…It is active in working to spread its form of Islam in the region and is having some success.’
None of that has anything to do with nukes. Why are we constantly told there is a nuke threat from Iran, when we make jokes about North Korea, who actually have these weapons and issue statements about hitting the US with them?
Here’s an inconsistency; we know North Korea wouldn’t dare to use nukes. The same with Iran. But we’ve got Iran surrounded with bases, aircraft carriers, etc. We use cyber attacks against Iran, Their scientists are assassinated. We’re running a proxy war (using Al-Qaeda, as we supposedly fight them in Afghanistan) against Iran through Syria.
It just seems to me that someone in the media would contrast the Iran/N Korea reactions.
Ben, the issues are related. We do not take the threats by North Korea to attack the US with nukes seriously since they do not have the capacity to hit anywhere but Alaska and we have defensive missiles to stop that.
They do not have the conventional weapons capacity to cut-off anything we need.
Iran is different they have the capacity to cut-off oil supplies. While we have the conventional forces to end that cut-off, if they have nuclear weapons they could attack our forces or nuke Saudi Arabia. This is similar to the situation in Korean area where the South Koreans have had to absorb the limited conventional attacks by the North without a response, at least in part because of the threat to go nuclear. A nuclear capacity would allow Iran to engage in a more aggressive policy in the region.
Add to that the ability to attack Israel and you are dealing with a very different situation.
‘We do not take the threats by North Korea to attack the US with nukes seriously since they do not have the capacity to hit anywhere but Alaska and we have defensive missiles to stop that’
So we don’t have bases in that part of the world? You are purposefully dancing around the essential contradiction here. Never mind.
‘Iran is different they have the capacity to cut-off oil supplies’
Then we should try to get along with them, huh?
‘A nuclear capacity would allow Iran to engage in a more aggressive policy in the region’
Aggressive like invading Iraq? Oh, that was the US! Isn’t it a crime to invade a country who poses no threat and hasn’t done anything?
How about assassinating scientists; not in Pakistan, but on the streets of Iran. What’s the word for that? Terrorism.
‘Add to that the ability to attack Israel’
Like Israel doesn’t go around killing, bombing, assassinating people, shooting up ships/cars all the time. I can’t imagine why anyone would want to attack Israel!
Don’t look now, but the boys are coming home from yet another failed military adventure. I understand there are 2 US military suicides a day. Citizens here are stocking up on guns and ammo, and not to fight Muslims, BTW. If you look hard, you might see the Empires high-water mark fading in the distance.
No flattery intended but you are one badassed mofo when it comes to wielding truth. You just shutdown the conversation using it.
Ben, I have been against any nation building efforts in the Middle East. The bodies are coming home because in both Iraq and Afghanistan we tried to go beyond punishing people for bad behavior to trying to create a democracy in an area which is not fertile to democracy. Both wars would have been cheap in blood and money had we restricted our aims. In Afghanistan, we should have just insisted that the terrorists have no base and in Iraq the removal of Saddam for his actions against us which included an attempt on a US presidents life when visiting Kuwait. Flipping Iraq from a Sunni dominated to a Shiite dominated country just helped Iran.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/timeline/062793.htm
Hint:
It has little to do with nukes and everything to do with Iran’s oil bourse no longer being denominated in USD. (As of 3/20/12, which coincidentally was just about when the war drums began to beat.)
Remember, “we” invaded Iraq not because Saddam was selling oil too high, but because he was selling it too low.
Remember, “we” invaded Iraq not because Saddam was selling oil too high, but because he was selling it too low.
Link?
It has little to do with nukes and everything to do with Iran’s oil bourse no longer being denominated in USD. (As of 3/20/12, which coincidentally was just about when the war drums began to beat.)
Now, I do agree that THIS played a role, Iraq also tried to price its oil outside the USD. Banksters will fight to protect fiat money and US banksters will fight to keep the USD as the reserve currency. Manipulate the metals markets, war, whatever it takes not to lose the ability to control the money supply and thus the stock market etc. This knowledge of when money is easy or tight or to make it loose or tight allows them to accumulate more wealth.
Most recent links:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/22/the-usa-attacked-iraq-because-saddam-had-wd/
http://www.gregpalast.com/how-george-bush-won-the-war-in-iraq-really/#more-7963
Ben we did attack Iraq and they had no nuke?
It’s all about the oil.
It’s all about the oil ??
Its all about Israel….
It’s all about the oiligarchy’s money.
The US is definitely Israel’s friend. Is Israel the US’ friend? I think less so. It makes sense after WWII the Jews wanted out of Europe but talk about going from the frying pan to the fire.
For a fraction of the blood and money spent on Israel you could set up a Jew community in the southwest of US.
Sand is sand. I say this as someone who ancestry is 1/2 Jewish and who had many family members perish in the holocaust. But this obsession about a patch of sand in the middle east is insane. But I guess I am here in the US because my ancestors were more sane. They left Europe right before WWI. They could see it coming. They had four teenage sons and thought four teenage sons + war not a good combo. The eldest enlisted much to his parents’ horror but came to the US after his stint as a POW when the war ended.
There’s quite the brain drain out of Israel. And, you won’t believe this, but guess where those brains are going.
If you guessed the United States, you’re right. They’re coming here. Because of our political stability. And for the fact that we’re surrounded by friendlier neighbors.
Is Israel the US’ friend?
USS Liberty
It was a shameful example of putting domestic politics above US interests. The Israeli lobby which primarily supported democrats but had significant Republican support pressured the US to cover up the murder of US servicemen during the 67 war by Israel’s air force. President Johnson should have been ashamed of himself.
But as the Arab countries have moved from a Pan-Arabist modernizing ideology to a 7th century ideology that requires the conquering of the world for Islam by military means if necessary, we actually share more in common with Israel and making them make concessions will not make the world safer. Even Israel knows they should have made peace before the rise of radical Islam but now it is too late and the irony is they helped it by funding Hamas to undermine the PLO and split Arab Christians from Arab Moslems.
Here, you get to the gist of why many countries are eager to have nuclear weapons.
It’s hard for many to see the issue from the side of the opponent. But doing so is necessary to understand the overall situation. Surprisingly, the Iranians don’t see themselves as cartoon villains.
Turn the austerity up to 11
cnbc.com/id/100605217?__source=yahoo%7Cheadline%7Cother%7Ctext%7C&par=yahoo
linky no clicky
“linky no clicky”
Try this, it’s a good read:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100605217
The inability of Spain and France to drastically cut budget deficits in a recessionary economy is a clear proof – if one was needed – that the German austerity mantra is nonsense and has always been. These two countries are the “declared” cases of budgetary slippages, but others will follow.
Confiscations of bank deposits are a much more dangerous nonsense. A failure of financial authorities to supervise the banking system is a failure of public policy, a failure of people whose salaries are paid by depositors as taxpayers to provide an essential public good: a sound and a reliable financial system. By reaching into depositors’ – taxpayers’ – pockets to pay for errors of public policy, the German-Dutch-Finnish disciplinarians are not only violating the rules of public service, but they are also running afoul of basic principles of social equity and justice.
I hope Washington will take all this very seriously. Surely, some Beltway pundits will probably gloat about German incompetence. And they might also like the fact that the U.S. is benefiting from the flight of capital to its safe, deep and broad financial markets
And when you stop to think about how things are sucking here at home, you have to wonder just how bad they are elsewhere.
And when you stop to think about how things are sucking here at home, you have to wonder just how bad they are elsewhere ??
Exactly Colorado…Other than maybe Germany what other country is safe in the EU ?? We are the cleanest shirt in the dirty laundry…So they are buying our assets & bonds because they believe its the only haven that has a good chance of returning the principal even if its eroded by some inflation over time…
If sometime wonder what I would do with a Powerball jackpot if I was lucky enough to win it. Where could I stash it to keep it safe? Treasuries? Stock market? Corporate Bonds? Swiss bank accounts. Piles of gold coins? (I guess I could swim in them a la Scrooge McDuck)
By living well (this could mean doing charity, etc…) Good memories should be a part of every portfolio. Since one’s time is finite.
Comment
Excellent post.
Good memories are defintely worth the visit.
Also, your children will remember you for what you did with them, not what you bought them.
That link did not work either. But in general what those on the left just do not want to admit, austerity is not a first choice, it is what happens when you run out of money and credit. Germany was just more responsible and it engaged in its austerity first. The countries are broke, they have to engage in austerity despite the pain, the longer we pretend we can just borrow money the worse it is going to be for us. Increasing consumption with debt is not a long term strategy, creating another housing bubble (our present policy) is just making the problem worse. The argument made by Krugman that we should borrow while its cheap, is no better than the real estate agent who encouraged people to take the teaser rate on the mortgage. The low interest rates cannot and will not last and servicing of the debt will consume all the tax revenue.
Running a deficit is essentially borrowing growth from the future. Because we have run up almost 7 trillion dollars in debt the last five years, we are going to grow slower in the future.
Why I am not surprised you will take article like this to heart.
Here’s the title - Why Only Obama Can Save Europe, Now
I though that title was absurd. We can’t even save ourselves.
The low interest rates cannot and will not last and servicing of the debt will consume all the tax revenue ??
Which is why I suspect the tax code will be completely overhauled…
How do we get more revenue ?? No more tax subsides for farmers…No more MID…No more deduction for state & local taxes…No more child credit…Less welfare…Less food stamps…Smaller military budget…On & On…They will get the revenue…They MUST…Its not like they have a choice…They will just get it in a way that you cannot avoid…National sales tax would be another one…
Scdave , it will consume all the present revenue stream, if you allow the debt to grow and then interest rates increase. You are right that no matter what they will get the revenue and austerity will be imposed. However, the longer we put off austerity the harsher the austerity will have to be.
However, the longer we put off austerity the harsher the austerity will have to be.
I once saw a movie called “Deadly Equations” or something like that. About excess weight on a spacecraft and the longer they waited to solve the problem the more weight would have to be jettisoned in order to survive. Eventually including people.
However, the longer we put off austerity the harsher the austerity will have to be ??
I don’t know about harsher but longer maybe….Problem is we have to many riding in the wagon and not enough people pulling it…Tax Reform will get a lot more people pulling than riding….I still think a national sales tax is in the cards…It would raise a boat load of revenue and everyone would pay…
Or they could just print massive piles of money and instead of handing to rich wall street types they could rebuild our infrastructure and telecomunications and give incentives for distributive generation - ie generators in every business with combined heat and power generation (80% eff vs current model of 35% ) solar geothermal etc.
Then initiate trade policy that charges taxes on countries that don’t pay a certain minimum wage.
These things would generate revenue and stimulate the economy and the velocity of money.
Eliminate the debt, leave the revenue as-is. Done.
Updated March 31, 2013, 10:20 p.m. ET
Crossroad Ahead for Investors
Cornered by Fed Into Buying Riskier Assets, It’s a Guessing Game When Central Bank Decides to Turn Off Liquidity Spigot.
By TOM LAURICELLA
Investors have been rewarded since the financial crisis for following the old Wall Street adage of “Don’t fight the Fed.” That has meant loading up on stocks and riskier corporate debt as the Federal Reserve’s low interest rates have reduced the attractiveness of “safer” investments such as Treasurys.
But investors now find themselves having to constantly look over their shoulder to see when the Fed will shift gears or risk losing what they have gained.
During the first quarter, the move into riskier assets only intensified, with major central banks around the globe influencing financial markets to an even greater degree than just a few months ago. The result: record-breaking rallies in U.S. stocks and below-investment-grade bonds.
Not only has the Fed significantly expanded its footprint in the financial markets by essentially doubling the pace of its bond buying from last year, but the Bank of Japan is likely to finally join the aggressive easy-money club in an attempt to revive the moribund Japanese economy.
Those expectations alone—the Bank of Japan hasn’t actually done anything yet in 2013—were enough to spark a 19% rally in the Nikkei Stock Average in the first quarter. That made Japanese stocks the best performers among developed-economy stock markets, a big change from their reputation as dead money in a country mired in a long stagnation. Meanwhile, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index gained 10% on its way to a record of 1569.19 on the final trading day of the quarter.
If it does open the spigots of monetary easing, the Bank of Japan would join in with the Fed, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and, to a lesser degree, the European Central Bank, with policies aimed squarely at the financial markets.
“It’s no longer just a question of fighting the Fed, you’re fighting them all,” said Jason Trennert, chief investment strategist at Strategas Research Partners.
…
Shakespeare was a tax-evading food hoarder, study claims
William Shakespeare evaded tax and illegally stockpiled food during times of shortage so he could sell it at high prices, academics have claimed.
… a new study has found that he was repeatedly prosecuted and fined for illegally hoarding food, and threatened with jail for failing to pay his taxes, The Sunday Times reported.
Court and tax records show that over a 15-year period Shakespeare purchased grain, malt and barley to store and resell for inflated prices, according to a paper by Aberystwyth University academics Dr Jayne Archer, Professor Richard Marggraf Turley and Professor Howard Thomas.
The study notes: “By combining both illegal and legal activities, Shakespeare was able to retire in 1613 as the largest property owner in his home town, Stratford-upon-Avon. His profits - minus a few fines for illegal hoarding and tax evasion - meant he had a working life of just 24 years.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/william-shakespeare/9963602/Shakespeare-was-a-tax-evading-food-hoarder-study-claims.html
a few fines for illegal hoarding and tax evasion
He was simply “saving” money in one of the few ways possible at the time. “Illegality” is sometimes simply a figment of an oligarch’s imagination.
He was a Prepper!
From a miscellaneous news item recently:
Where?
Where?
Cut, paste & Google that first sentence. It’s a quote & hit #1 gives the details.
It’s considered good manners (by the board host no less) to add a link when quoting something.
Egypt.
What’s really going on in California
California imposed a new law on banks innocuously called “Homeowners Bill of Rights” which forces banks to switch over to a judicial foreclosure process, which they can opt to do on their own, but takes a year or more to renegotiate contracts and compensation structures for the foreclosure law firms who do all the leg work for the banks. And while those changes are being made… it makes it appear that foreclosures have slowed down dramatically in the state.
The reality?
Defaults (undeclared) are spiraling upward that yet have to pass through the foreclosure pipeline.
The truth?
California is still the highest foreclosure state in sheer volume and percentage.
The low-down?
Resale housing is still massively overpriced as a result of unprecedented interference by individual states and the federal government. The market distortions will be removed and the down draft will continue allowing the market to correct.
With millions of excess empty houses and housing demand at 17 year lows, housing prices have a long way to fall. A very long way to fall.
Ben, here’s one for the next time you do an international news desk-clearing. For the record, I have not been to Medellín, but what I’ve seen in Bogotá is very similar to this.
________________________________/
“In 2010, Medellin saw a price increase of 5.8%, followed by 6.2% in 2011 and 5.9% in 2012. This is pretty reflective of many parts of Colombia.
So is the real estate bubble coming?
I get this question a lot in Medellin as there is a lot of pre-construction high rise development going on, all over town, and especially in El Poblado, Medellin’s answer to Beverly Hills. Visitors say how can you keep building up this inventory? Surely it cannot sustain itself and prices will collapse.
Since I have to explain this to prospective buyers it is critical that my research be credible and believable. So here is why I think that not only is there no bubble in Colombia, but that there has never been a better time to buy, especially in Medellin.”
http://tinyurl.com/cwzha4q
Thanks, I haven’t been able to do research lately because the foreclosure business is overwhelming right now. But from the article:
‘I get this question a lot in Medellin as there is a lot of pre-construction high rise development going on, all over town, and especially in El Poblado, Medellin’s answer to Beverly Hills. Visitors say how can you keep building up this inventory? Surely it cannot sustain itself and prices will collapse.’
‘Since I have to explain this to prospective buyers it is critical that my research be credible and believable. So here is why I think that not only is there no bubble in Colombia, but that there has never been a better time to buy, especially in Medellin’
‘wages are pegged to the annual inflation rate which from 2002-2008 ranged from 4-8% and from 2009-2012 ranged from 3-4%. Thus more than 50% of each year’s price increases in real estate are offset by higher annual wages that are pegged to the national inflation rate’
(Of course wages go up during a bubble. You might see 25YO mortgage brokers make 300k a year. I remember during the dotcom bubble, a guy would deliver as package on his bicycle and we would hire him on the spot. And still, the writer doesn’t explain the OTHER 50% of price increases.)
‘If you grant Medellin as being a “cosmopolitan city”, which most people would agree, then Medellin is the lowest priced cosmopolitan city in the world on a cost per sq. meter basis…The secondary market, where we do most of our sales, prices are typically between $800 and $1400 per sq. meter ($74 - $130 per sq. ft). This certainly implies that Medellin and many other parts of Colombia are a bargain when comparing prices internationally. When have you ever heard of bargain prices in a real estate bubble?’
(Yes, the old, “we’re cheaper than London” routine.)
‘Thus I believe the Colombian “housing bubble” is uniformed diatribe.’
(And we finish up with the usual nasty put down of non-believers.)
“I haven’t been able to do research lately because the foreclosure business is overwhelming right now.”
Interesting contrast to MSM hype:
Foreclosure Crisis: The Reality Behind the Housing Recovery Hype
March 18, 2013
By Carlos Marroquin
Los Angeles, March 17, 2013 - In recent months, real estate pundits have been saying that the housing markets are recovering. They point to increases in sales and home prices, as well as a decline in foreclosure filings, and predict that the worst of the foreclosure crisis is over.
The crisis may be almost over for the banks, but it is far from over for average people. Banks have completed foreclosure on approximately 3.9 million homes since September 2008, according to a Dec. 2012 report by CoreLogic. And 1.3 million homes, or 3.2% of all homes with a mortgage, were in some stage of the foreclosure process as of October, 2012.
1. Looking forward, there are another three million homes that are seriously delinquent and have yet to enter foreclosure.
2. With so many homeowners losing or having lost their homes, what is causing the increase in sales and prices? A look at the business press reveals that the so-called recovery of the market is based more on the purchase of homes by investors than home ownership by American families, which is on the decline.
…
Market Watch
“Wealthy homeowners are increasingly asking their houses to earn their keep.
Lenders say a growing number of luxury homeowners are turning to a prerecession tactic of withdrawing equity from their homes. And just like during the housing bubble, many of these affluent borrowers aren’t using this cash to renovate their homes. Instead, they’re pumping it into investments, including the stock market, other real-estate purchases or even using the money to purchase art, which they expect will generate large returns going forward. In other cases, they’re choosing to use this cash to pay for their children’s college tuition or other expenses that they’d otherwise finance with higher-interest debt.
Experts say the increase in cash-out refinancing comes at an opportune time: Interest rates remain near historic lows and the U.S. stock market is at record highs. Rates on 30-year fixed private jumbo mortgages—which start after $417,000 in most parts of the country and exceed $625,500 in pricey metro areas—average 4.02% as of the week ending March 22. That’s down from 4.70% a year prior and 5.49% two years ago, according to mortgage info website HSH.com. Rates on the 15-year fixed private jumbo average 3.30%, compared with 3.95% and 3.96%, respectively.
“Experts say the increase in cash-out refinancing comes at an opportune time: Interest rates remain near historic lows and the U.S. stock market is at record highs.”
“… U.S. stock market is at record highs.”
Which is - what? - a reason to mortgage one’s house so as to buy stocks?
Raise the price of most anything and generally sales will drop off. Lower the price and generally sales will pick up. Nobody thinks this to be strange.
If stocks have their prices lowered then sales of stocks drop off. If their prices are raised then sales pick up. Nobody thinks this as being strange either, which is a bit strange in itself if one cares to think about it a bit.
Price equals value? Raise the price and - presto - you raise the value?
Lol.
“Buying Because Prices Are Going Up”
http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=7659
What’s neat about raising the price of stocks or the price of houses is you don’t have to work to raise the price of every share of stock or work to raise the price of every house in the neighborhood. No, you only have to work to raise the price of a representative few shares of stock or raise the price of a representative few number of houses.
Raise the price of a representative few shares of stock or a few houses and the price of all the comps will rise right along with it. And when you raise the value of all the comps - whether they are stocks or houses - then you make the owners of the comps all the more richer.
Pure effin magic.
Yeah, like you’ll hear about stocks rising on “thin volume”. Right now homeowner formation is dropping by many thousands a quarter, but we’re told houses are in short supply. This is a PT Barnum market.
Where do you see homeowner formation dropping?
The last three reported quarters by the Census (Table 8 on their Housing Vacancies and Homeownership Historical Tables) show increasing numbers of homeowners. And total households (homeowner PLUS renter households) is up by about 1MM year on year.
Total vacant housing units represent 13.48% of the total in Q4 2012, down from 13.88% Q4 of 2011.
Do you mean the homeownership rate is falling? That is still correct, as there are proportionately more new renter households than buyer households each quarter.
And to be clear, I’m not saying everything is hunky dory…there are clearly parts of the country that have not yet begun to clear their distress, but things are generally heading in the right direction (albeit slowly).
And I don’t define “right direction” as rising home prices. I define “right direction” as moving back to “normalcy” in terms of distress, vacancy, household formation, and stable levels of housing development (appropriate to the growth of the US population).
And the most recent Census shows another decade of slowing population growth to the lowest levels in US history.
Vacant housing? With 25 MILLION excess empty houses and growing by the day, It’s going to be a long time to get back to typical vacancy rates. Worse yet, an additional 35 MILLION houses have just begun to vacate as boomers head to the grave.
So how does all this excess housing inventory and land jive now that you’ve disclosed that you have a stake in the direction of prices?
(Newser) – A major Supreme Court decision in India could be good news for patients in developing countries, activists say. The court ruled that Novartis couldn’t have a new patent for a tuneup to an existing cancer drug, since it’s not a new medicine, the AP reports. “Patents will be given only for genuine inventions, and repetitive patents will not be given for minor tweaks to an existing drug,” a lawyer for a generic drugmaker said. India produces generic drugs for countries across the developing world.
The fight over the drug, known as Glivec or Gleevec, began in 2006 after India’s patent office denied Novartis’ application; the office referred to “evergreening,” when companies seek new patents after slightly altering medicines. “The generic version makes it affordable to so many more poor people, not just in India, but across the world,” said an activist. “For cancer sufferers, this ruling will mean the difference between life and death.” Novartis, however, said the decision was a “setback for patients.” Said an exec: “We strongly believe patents safeguard innovation and encourage medical progress.”
I seem to recall reading that the pharma industry spends much more on marketing than it does on R&D.
And lobbying.
With 20-30 million excess empty houses and prices slipping daily, why buy a house now?
ft dot com
April 1, 2013 8:24 pm
US has lost 2m clerical jobs since 2007
By Robin Harding in Washington
The US has gained 387,000 managers and lost almost 2m clerical jobs since 2007, as new technologies replace office workers and plunge the American middle class deeper into crisis.
Data from the Bureau of Labour Statistics divide the US workforce into 821 jobs from dishwasher to librarian. They show rapid structural shifts – on top of a cyclical unemployment rate of 7.7 per cent – that may increase income inequality.
The figures help explain why the US median household income has fallen 5.6 per cent since June 2009 to $51,404, even as the economy recovers. The top 10 per cent of American earners, meanwhile, are collecting most fruits of the recovery.
One probable cause of rising inequality is new computing technologies that destroy some middle-class occupations even as they create jobs for highly skilled workers who can exploit them.
The number of clerical workers such as book-keepers, tellers, data entry keyers, file clerks and typists has been falling, pointing to a structural decline. The number of retail cashiers has also dropped – indicating that internet shopping and self-checkout systems may be eroding another occupation.
Employment growth came from healthcare, management, computing and food service jobs. The number of personal care aides is up 390,000 since 2007. Demand for people who figure out how to replace clerical workers – such as operations managers, management analysts and logisticians – grew substantially.
“We see growth in jobs that require complex, personalised interactions, such as home health aides, and continued declines in routine transaction and production jobs that can be scripted and automated,” said Susan Lund, co-author of a McKinsey Global Institute report on the future of work.
…
The future belongs to Lucky Ducky.
Pope Francis to move out of Vatican and live on the streets of Rome in a cardboard box.
Bagholder identification process continues:
Ruling Sets Stage for Pension Battle in Bankrupt City
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
Published: April 1, 2013
A federal bankruptcy judge ruled on Monday that the city of Stockton, Calif., was eligible for court protection from its creditors, clearing the way for a battle over whether public workers’ pensions can be cut when the city they work for goes bankrupt.
After declaring Chapter 9 bankruptcy last year, Stockton eliminated tens of millions of dollars in city services and said it would cut back some municipal bond payments in a way unseen before in municipal bankruptcy. But bondholders objected to Stockton’s effort to protect pensions while forcing losses on investors.
Many states have statutes and constitutional provisions making it illegal to cut public workers’ pensions. Until now, there has not been a major test of those laws in bankruptcy — particularly not in California, where the big state pension system, known as Calpers, has been girding for battle on the issue, trying to avoid the precedent of a cutoff or shortfall in a city’s pension contributions.
Federal bankruptcy law often trumps state laws, but municipal bankruptcies are so rare that there is almost no precedent on how to apply the law to state pension provisions.
In a ruling issued Monday in Sacramento, Judge Christopher M. Klein said he could see battle lines being drawn between Calpers and Stockton’s other creditors, including several companies that either bought Stockton’s bonds or insured them. But he ruled that it was still too early in the case for that battle to be joined.
“There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon,” he said.
…
This is what we were all waiting for:
Seems like the NYT left out an important quote……
But the case is also being watched closely because it could answer the significant question of who gets paid first by financially strapped cities — retirement funds or creditors.
“I don’t know whether spiked pensions can be reeled back in,” U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein said while making the ruling. “There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon.
Why pay these grossly inflated asking prices for resale housing when you can rent the same thing for half the monthly cost?
Mr Market seems to be attempting to price in anticipated future capital gains and rental increases.
“I visited four showrooms looking for a vanity and decided on one from Lowe’s.”
Did you go to Olive Garden for lunch?
…. and she attended a seminar how to good money after bad on a depreciating asset called a “house”. The seminar was sponsored and facilitated by CraterCare
Just got a check from Cyprus but the bank bounced.
Posted: 4:12 p.m. Monday, April 1, 2013
Postcard alerts of foreclosure cash for more than 683,000 Floridians could be ignored
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
More than 683,000 Floridians are expected to receive foreclosure-restitution checks beginning this month through federal agreements with banks, but consumer advocates fear the letters could be mistaken for a scam or junk mail and thrown away.
The agreements, which replace the failed Independent Foreclosure Review, dole out $3.6 billion in cash to 4.2 million homeowners nationwide who were in some stage of foreclosure during 2009 and 2010.
Those eligible for the cash, including 50,599 people in Palm Beach County, should have received a postcard within the past two weeks alerting them a check worth between $250 and $125,000 is on its way.
But the unassuming postcard from Minneapolis-based Rust Consulting, the firm contracted by federal regulators to disburse the checks, is being questioned by wary homeowners already overwhelmed with foreclosure-related mailings. Rust Consulting also has an office in Palm Beach Gardens.
“I didn’t know what it was,” said Vero Beach resident Sheri Forman about the postcard. “When we were going through a loan modification we got all kinds of things in the mail from people saying they were going to give us $10,000 or whatever. There are so many scams.”
In January, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said it had reached agreements with 13 financial institutions to atone for foreclosure-related abuses and replace the Independent Foreclosure Review. The review had asked homeowners to apply to have their foreclosure inspected and receive compensation based on the findings.
Few people signed up for the review despite a $35 million advertising campaign and two deadline extensions. As of late September, just 3.8 percent of Floridians who were sent letters about the program had applied. In Palm Beach County, 50,599 residents were sent letters explaining the review, and 1,954 responded.
“I couldn’t believe people weren’t calling up for free money,” said Jim DiPaola, a Palm Beach County Realtor with Keller Williams and co-host of the show “Talk Real Estate with Rob and Jim” on WZZR 94.3.
DiPaola said the review was discussed several times on his program. Now, he’s concerned homeowners will miss out again by ignoring the postcard and check.
Kevin Maher, community outreach director for West Palm Beach-based DebtHelper.com shares DiPaola’s worry. A volunteer for DebtHelper.com brought in one of the postcards recently asking whether it was legitimate, he said.
“I’ve seen enough missed opportunities by homeowners because they were uninformed about options or programs,” Maher said. “I just had a feeling this could be a likely scenario.”
In addition to the $3.6 billion in cash payments, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency agreements provide $5.7 billion in other mortgage relief, such as principal reductions or short sale approvals. The agreements are separate from the $25 billion attorneys general settlement reached in February 2012.
For more information go to http://www.independentforeclosurereview.com or call Rust Consulting at 888-952-9105. Borrowers can also seek advice from a federal housing counselor at 888-995-4673.
Posted: 7:18 p.m. Monday, April 1, 2013
Judge rules Stockton, Calif., to enter bankruptcy
By TRACIE CONE
The Associated Press
SACRAMENTO, Calif. —
The people of Stockton will feel financial fallout for years after a federal judge ruled Monday to let the city become the most populous in the nation to enter bankruptcy.
But the case is also being watched closely because it could answer the significant question of who gets paid first by financially strapped cities — retirement funds or creditors.
“I don’t know whether spiked pensions can be reeled back in,” U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein said while making the ruling. “There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon.”
The potential constitutional question in the Stockton case is whether federal bankruptcy law trumps a California law that says money owed to the state pension fund must be paid.
In making his ruling, Klein disagreed with creditors who argued that Stockton failed to pursue all avenues for straightening out its financial affairs.
“It’s apparent to me the city would not be able to perform its obligations to its citizens on fundamental public safety as well as other basic government services without the ability to have the muscle of the contract-impairing power of federal bankruptcy law,” Klein said.
‘At issue will be whether U.S. bankruptcy law trumps California law, which says the pension plan must be funded. The $900 million Stockton owes to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to cover pensions is its biggest debt -– as is the case with many cities in California.’
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-stockton-bankruptcy-pension-20130401,0,7699982.story
Are there more people in Stockton than Cyprus?
‘The $900 million Stockton owes to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to cover pensions is its biggest debt -– as is the case with many cities in California.’
Just shy of $1 bn in pension debt for one small California city? Wow…
Yup, our pension loving overlords sure have screwed us. Jerry Brown doesn’t even have the guts to face up to current employees when it comes to stopping practices like pension spiking.
After he presented his plan, that would clearly stop pension spiking for new employees, but left it intact for current employees, I wrote his office asking why they didn’t stop this egregious practice for all pensioners, and they simply referred me to his plan…deflect.
Until public unions have lost some of this stranglehold over Sacramento, I will never vote in favor of anything that gives them more power, and will vote in favor of everything, no matter how far reaching, that takes some of their power away.
oxide
We purchased our bathroom vanities from Lowes and love them. We went with a builders style, that doesn’t have feet and look replaced. Chocolate w/ Quartz counter tops. I bought the Allen and Roth Leaves fixture (using CFLs) in the hall ba, and a round beveled mirror at Target in Oil Rubbed Bronze, and it looks beautiful.
Lowes had a double towel rod by Delta that was hard to find.
Our home is beautiful. Now its planting the front yard time. We just had a brick and cement entry done. Circa 1960’s and no one ever gave this home a walkway/steps to the front door. It’s finally inviting.
When we are home, our hearts sing with joy.
^^^^^^
LOL
realtors are liars
This is the most amazing video you will watch this year:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=rTJ00aTLres
What better way to restore a Rule of Law in the Wild, Wild West financial services industry than to take away their seats in the halls of political power? Perhaps the beginning of the end of ‘too big to jail’ is at hand.
ft dot com
Jamming Wall St’s revolving door to power
By Tom Braithwaite
Potential damage from Washington’s distaste for bankers
It is now hard to believe that a career on Wall Street was once a qualification rather than an impediment for a job in Washington.
When Hank Paulson moved from Goldman Sachs to the Treasury in 2006, his banking past was neither excoriated nor really examined.
A Democratic senator did note the revolving door between Goldman and the government. But this is how he did it: “[Mr Paulson would] continue the long history of Goldman Sachs heads, including former Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin, New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, Deputy Secretary of State John Whitehead, serving their country with great distinction and success.”
Times have changed. The current head of Goldman is highly unlikely to be allowed to serve his country with distinction. And last week it emerged that Ruth Porat, chief financial officer of Morgan Stanley, will not be nominated as deputy Treasury secretary. Two people familiar with the situation say they feared her finances would be attacked during a congressional hearing.
Back in 2006 Washington barely blinked when Mr Paulson sold half a billion dollars of Goldman stock in advance of his move to Treasury. (It proved quite a good deal. Had he been forced to hold on to it he would have seen it halve in the crisis and still fail to surpass the previous level now.) It also came with a customary tax break – just try introducing something similar today – that allows wealthy individuals joining the government to defer capital gains tax.
If it is a new-found distaste for Wall Street that sunk Ms Porat’s nomination, it would be a shame for Washington and worse for Wall Street.
One of the industry’s most senior women, she helped shepherd Morgan Stanley through turbulent years after the crisis, shoring up investor confidence that the bank’s capital and liquidity was sound and could withstand further shocks.
She serves on the Treasury borrowing advisory committee, an industry panel that counsels government officials on debt issuance and wider market stability.
Following the departure of Tim Geithner as secretary, the Treasury needs someone with financial clout. Mr Geithner is being replaced by Jack Lew, a budget wonk – arguably the right horse for the course but not a markets expert.
The crisis is over but the new regulations are worryingly unfinished. The reinvention of the US housing system, on which, incidentally, Ms Porat quietly advised the Treasury in 2008, has not even started. New problems such as student loans are brewing.
For Wall Street the stakes are higher. If the industry has sunk so low that its top talent cannot be safely considered for Treasury jobs, bankers will lose their seat at the table.
…
April 1, 2013, 10:17 am
Bond Bubble Brouhaha
Brad DeLong is puzzled by Martin Feldstein’s mental contortions as he tries to come up with a reason to raise interest rates in a depressed economy. So am I. But I’m also puzzled by Feldstein’s underlying economic analysis, in which he treats it as totally obvious that we have a massive bond bubble.
Now, maybe we do have a bond bubble. But the arguments Feldstein uses are one that I thought every sensible economist — a group I thought included Feldstein — had dismissed as bogus years ago. Feldstein writes:
In the words of Charlie Brown, aauuuggghhh! Why do we have large fiscal deficits? Because of the collapse of private demand, especially housing. The private sector’s financial surplus has surged; government deficits have risen in counterpart through the operation of automatic stabilizers, mainly revenue but also unemployment insurance and other safety-net programs.
…
Everyone except for the doves on the FOMC seem to spot bubbles in every direction as far as the eye can see.
Panos Mourdoukoutas, Contributor
Markets
4/01/2013 @ 1:45PM
How To Trade The Reflation Of Multiple Bubbles
In case you haven’t noticed, the multiple-asset bubble of 2006-7 is back. Home prices are jumping at double-digit rates in all the usual places—like Arizona and Florida. Equity markets hit all-time highs, with S&P 500 (SPY) up 11.82 percent over the last quarter; and Dow Jones (DIA) and Nasdaq (QQQ) following closely behind. The US Treasury market continues to trade near record low yields, while precious metals ETFs like SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), and iSilver Trust (SLV) have been holding steady after their recent correction, not too far from their all time highs.
The only thing that is different this time around is that the air that blows into the bubble doesn’t come from securitization and subprime loans, but several rounds of QE by the Fed and overseas central bankers that have kept most interest rates near zero levels.
Not everyone subscribes to the multi-bubble reflation theory, however. In spite of their big comeback, home prices are well below their pre-crash highs. Equity valuations are still reasonable, with the S&P500 Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio slightly above its long-term average. And the overall economy continues to improve, especially the labor market. Bullish Wall Street observers would compare the current equity valuations to those of 1982, which marked the beginning of a prolonged bull-market.
The problem, however, is that in 1982 most interest rates were in double digit, due to tight monetary policy in the preceding years. This meant that interest rates had nowhere to go but lower, as the Fed began easing to fight the recession, giving a big boost to real estate and equity prices.
Now, the opposite is the case. Interest rates are near zero, and have nowhere to go but up, if the economy improves and inflation catches up with Wall Street.
In either case, the consensus is that asset prices have further to go. This means that chances favor investors on the long side of the market—bubbles can be very rewarding for investors, provided that they catch the train early and leave at the right time.
…
Why is it that everyone except the Fed and its minions believe this bull market is really just another bubble about to pop?
April 2, 2013, 12:01 a.m. EDT
The only 4 strategies to use in the next crash
Commentary: Even 5-year-old Dizzy Boy can pick the right one
By Paul B. Farrell, MarketWatch
SAN LUIS OBISPO Calif. (MarketWatch) — It’s not complicated. Prepare all you want. But the bull ends. The market sinks deep into its third bear of the 21st century. Wall Street loses another $10 trillion of our retirement money.
Banks again get bailed out by clueless politicians. Their CEOs pocket new bailouts, splitting with the Super Rich. The recession goes on for a few years, again. Growth slows, austerity increases with unemployment and Fed rates.
That’s the relentless economic cycle. Predictable for eight centuries.
But “it’s not complicated.” That’s the message in the fab-u-lous ATT ads with those cute kids and their straight-man narrator all sitting in little chairs in a kindergarten classroom. Kooky kids. Yes, Ad Age says ATT’s hyping its brand in mobile networks:
“The kids’ imaginations turn boring brand attributes like multitasking or download speeds into loads of fun …. Case in point: Dizzy boy … is able to wiggle both his head and his hand at the same time. Or the precocious girl who notes that being fast is necessary to avoid being bitten by a werewolf. Or the kids in a new NCAA spot who discuss how to do two things at once in basketball, with the pickle roll.”
Werewolves of Wall Street, Washington will soon ‘turn’ America
Dizzy boy? Cute girl worrying about werewolf bites? The pickle roll in a basketball game? If you have an imagination, you already know the right answers. Yes, these kids remind me of the endless questions readers ask about what to do when the market peaks, as it always does, like now, in the fourth or fifth year of a bull market, then crashes.
An AT&T “kids” commercial.
It’s not complicated, folks. Focus on the dizzy boy, or the pickle roller, better yet, the precocious girl. Imagine, is she really worried about werewolves? Naw, she’ll roll with the punches. You should too.
Investing is not really complicated. Nor are your investment strategies that complicated. Limited yes. To four strategies. But when the market peaks, the bubble bursts, when you see it crash a couple thousand points, when you wake up to another recession and our clueless politicians are conned into bankrupting taxpayers again, bailing out Wall Street banks, again, and you’re wondering about your strategies, again … remember, “it’s not that complicated.”
You’ve been down this road before. This is the third time in this 21st century. You should be used to it by now. First the bear/recession after the 2000 dot-com crash dragged on for 30 very long, agonizing months, far longer than the nine-month average. Then the 2007-2009 bear recession also got agonizingly longer than usual.
Now the current bull is four years old, ancient by historical averages. So a new bear crash is a no-brainer.
Now what? Think like a 5-year-old kid … it’s not really that complicated
Seriously, you must be used to these painful cycles that Wall Street’s too-dumb-to-fail bankers and Washington’s dumb-and-dumber politicians keep subjecting American investors to. It’s not really that complicated. Our so-called leaders really don’t know what they’re doing. But get this, you do in fact know what’s best for you.
So let’s stop kidding ourselves, folks. Get real, this bull’s ready to do the pickle roll in the pasture. Think of the dizzy boy. And that precocious fearless little girl sitting in the small chair in kindergarten. Crashes? Bear market? Recession? They’re like her little fears of being bitten by a werewolf. She’d rather be a human: “It’s not complicated.”
…
April 1, 2013, 12:03 p.m. EDT
Bubble-era home-equity strategies are back
More wealthy owners are using home loans to play the stock market
By AnnaMaria Andriotis
Wealthy homeowners are increasingly asking their houses to earn their keep.
Lenders say a growing number of luxury homeowners are turning to a prerecession tactic of withdrawing equity from their homes. And just like during the housing bubble, many of these affluent borrowers aren’t using this cash to renovate their homes. Instead, they’re pumping it into investments, including the stock market, other real-estate purchases or even using the money to purchase art, which they expect will generate large returns going forward. In other cases, they’re choosing to use this cash to pay for their children’s college tuition or other expenses that they’d otherwise finance with higher-interest debt.
…