I sold home in Cyprus when my husband died…and bank kept my money
EXPAT Sharon Connor was trying to move forward after the sudden death of her husband Gary when Cyprus’s economic crisis just as abruptly made her life fall apart again.
And how, exactly, do you expect the state to be able to bail out oligarchs from the failure of their stupid gambles, to the tune of trillions of dollars, unless they take whatever they can get from savers?
Like death taxes are a constant. Got to figure them in your business model. I figure the non taxable retirement accounts in the US will be completely taxable and hence have planned accordingly.
We don’t pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes.
– Leona Helmsley
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Anon In DC
2013-04-14 15:15:02
Leona was foolish to go to jail for such a small amount of money. But the idea that the rich don’t pay taxes is fantasy. The top taxpayers pay a disproportionate share of taxes. Leona and her husband had paid millions and millions. But there it is never enough for the tax and spend crowd. I remember the Helmsley case well. After paying millions and millions she got fed up and cut corners. Some the reaction was something else. Reminded me of the allies’ anti German propaganda in WWI ( I am not that old we studied it in school) You would have though Leona was roasting babies alive then eating them a la the Huns rather than fudging her bookkeeping.
Letter from Rosa Koire, Executive Dir. of Post Sustainability Institute to Democrats in the Oklahoma Legislature to Support HB 1412
February 3, 2013
To my fellow Democrats in the Oklahoma Legislature:
Concerns about UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development are spreading throughout the United States. Although you will hear that this is a right-wing position, in fact there are many Democrats across the nation who share these concerns. Loss of rights—private property and civil rights—are a concern of all Americans and are not partisan. As a registered Democrat since 1974, I have a different point of view from many others who oppose UN Agenda 21. My group, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, is active in educating the nation on what it is, where it is, who is implementing it locally, and how to fight it. As the author of Behind The Green Mask: UN Agenda 21, I have been invited to lecture all over the United States, and expect to be in Tulsa this April. Your constituents in support of HB1412 have requested that I write to you about this important vote.
UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a blueprint, the action plan to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. It is a global plan but it is implemented locally. This comprehensive plan was agreed to by G. H. W. Bush in 1992 at the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. You will hear that this is a non-binding agreement, that it is a dusty twenty year old document, or that it is a benign plan for the salvation of the planet. The truth is that it is dependent on artificial consensus, on manufactured democracy, on government by unelected boards and commissions, and on regionalization at the expense of local and state government. In fact UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a green mask. Far from being a conspiracy theory, it is a fact, and has had tremendously negative impacts in nearly every town in the nation. Based on Communitarianism—the individual’s rights must be balanced with the rights of the community—Sustainable Development is at odds with our Constitution. The guarantees of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are considered to be selfish when ‘balanced’ with the undelineated and
Oklahoma has an opportunity to pass a bill that reaffirms its commitment to the fundamental precepts upon which our nation was founded. As a nation we fought in a war for independence which joined people of differing religious beliefs, cultural origins, and political viewpoints in the birthing of liberty. This hard-worn battle must be fought every day in the halls of Congress and the Senate, and in the statehouses of every state in the Union.
I urge you to recognize that this battle is non-partisan, vital, and elemental to our continuing ideal of ourselves as a nation conceived in liberty and committed to the protection of our citizens. Please vote to support HB1412. Thank you.
Rosa Koire, ASA
Executive Director
Post Sustainability Institute
We’ve got some agenda 21 enthusiasts here in Locaville so I can tell you it’s not an imagined conspiracy theory. But some people overblow the threat and say we are going to be forced into sharing our homes, etc. But they do push the whole beehive living model even though that’s popular with only a small segement of the population. All it takes is one high rise condo project with 2 sales out of 70 to nip that in the bud.
I hate to see this used as an excuse to stop building bike paths though.
“I’m guessing the fear is heavy on the tin foil hat”
That is exactly what Rosa Koire said you would hear when this was brought up. Then she said “so what” tell them to do the research.
Monday, 04 June 2012 04:25
Alabama Adopts First Official State Ban on UN Agenda 21
Alabama became the first state to adopt a tough law protecting private property and due process by prohibiting any government involvement with or participation in a controversial United Nations scheme known as Agenda 21. Activists from across the political spectrum celebrated the measure’s approval as a significant victory against the UN “sustainability” plot, expressing hope that similar sovereignty-preserving measures would be adopted in other states as the nationwide battle heats up.
The Alabama Senate Bill (SB) 477 legislation, known unofficially among some supporters as the “Due Process for Property Rights” Act, was approved unanimously by both the state House and Senate. After hesitating for a few days, late last month Republican Governor Robert Bentley finally signed into law the wildly popular measure — but only after heavy pressure from activists forced his hand.
Virtually no mention of the law was made in the establishment press. But analysts said the measure was likely the strongest protection against the UN scheme passed anywhere in America so far. The law, aimed at protecting private property rights, specifically prevents all state agencies and local governments in Alabama from participating in the global scheme in any way.
The U.S. Senate, of course, has never formally ratified Agenda 21. But the executive branch — in conjunction with accomplices at the international, state, and local levels — has for two decades been quietly attempting to impose the plan on Americans by stealth, mostly using deceptive terms like “Smart Growth” and “Green.” And proponents of the global scheme consistently threaten that states seeking to protect citizens from the UN plot could end up losing some federal funds.
“Every time you take a dollar of federal money, there’s strings attached,” explained Ken Freeman, chairman of the Alabama-based group Alliance for Citizens Rights (ACR), an organization that fought hard to ensure that the Governor signed the bill into law. “We were originally walking soft on this issue, to tell you the truth, because when things were going our way, why change anything?”
But when Gov. Bentley did not immediately approve the bill, Freeman told a reporter, ACR turned the activism up a notch, urging citizens to contact the Governor’s office and express their support for the measure. The grassroots pressure paid off: Alabama became the first state to be officially shielded by law from UN-linked anti-property rights scheming.
“It seems that Agenda 21 does actually bring people together in communities — just not in the way the U.N. had hoped for,” remarked Justice Gilpin-Green in a column for the conservative site Townhall, citing Freeman and other instrumental supporters of the effort. “Hopefully other states can mirror Alabama’s determined nature in passing their anti-Agenda 21 legislation. It was citizen awareness and direct action that finally brought about the needed changes last week and that same awareness and action will be needed for the future of every other state.”
Wasn’t I just saying the other day that effective city-wide bike paths were only found in liberal cities?
Now we’ve got the knuckledraggers thinking bike paths are a UN one-world government plot! Alabama, that long-time bastion and defender of freedom, has now banned them.
Rosa Koire is a liberal Democrat who happens to be gay, she is smart, articulate and my new hero. If you listen to this interview Behind the Green Mask, skip to the 2 minute mark and you won’t have to listen to the start of the radio program.
From posts on the blog, we gather that The Pimp/RAL/manyothernames works for, or knows about, pre-fab homes. Great. Pre-fab is a great idea.
The Pimp claims that he can build houses “on your lot” for $50-$60/square foot. For fun, I poked around the net for pricing. The lowest example I found was $64/ square foot. If he can find something lower, I invite him to post it. And then try to find a buyer actually willing to live in such a POS house. A mobile home is about $51, but that’s not really “on your lot.”
Yesterday, Pimp said that labor and materials for houses — I assume just the house, not the land — cost the same from state to state. They do NOT. They may cost the same in the factory, but at the very least, someone’s got to move the house from the factory to “your lot.” This alone costs more. I’ve listed two examples below.
The Pimp demanded to know how much we all paid per square foot for our debt junkie houses. Very well, Pimp, I paid $78 / sq ft for my HOUSE, which is right in line with these prices. A greater fraction of the value of my property is in the LAND. Why should I include the land value in the price/sq ft? You never do.
Here are some sample price/sq ft for pre-fab homes:
Single-wide mobile home: $51*
Blu Homes: (modern green design) Most of the US: $204 - $290
Blu Homes: (modern green design) CA, Canada, HI: add ~10%
Schumacher Homes: $64-$110
Phoenix custom homes: $73 for basic basic “Harvest Gold” (!) rambler
Irontown Homes “Walker” 3/2 rambler Utah: $111
Irontown Homes “Walker” 3/2 rambler CA and CO: $139
Pimp says that his price per square foot is what you should pay because it includes profit for the company. He hasn’t mentioned that it includes the company’s profit often in the past few months because his style of discourse has been deteriorating from already low level, but he has mentioned it in the past. However, the fact that he says regularly that his price per square foot is the most anyone should be *paying* includes an implication that he is talking about what the list price should be, not his company’s construction costs.
There it is folks. That’s the extent of our blog debt junkies credibility.
And as for you school marm, your consulting fee’s are massively inflated. They’re not getting their moneys woth. Get your act together.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SUGuy
2013-04-14 08:57:41
I buy the material and hire very experienced workers (15 to 20 years) to do the work. I can hire plumbers, electricians, drywaller’s, carpenters, and commercial roofers for between $15 to $20 (cash) per hour. Painters and landscapers for $10 to $12.50.
I pay what they ask.
My prices per sq feet are a lot lower than pimps. If you pay what pimp is advocating you will lose a LOTof money? Pimp has to pay insurance, fica, taxes, overhead, profits all that nonsense. I cut of the lazy CELL PHONE CONTRACTOR aka THE WINDSHIELD COWBOY.
Comment by SUGuy
2013-04-14 09:20:03
I do this with my Cars also. I have a fleet of 8 cars and my mechanic Pete fixes them for $25(cash) per hour. He even pickup the parts comes to my building after work or on weekends and maintains them. I have the air compressor and various tools and what I don’t have he brings them. Most mechanics can work on their cars after work at the dealership they are employed at and so if I need anything done that cannot be done at my building he brings the cars to his dealership and fixes them.
All true.
Insurance? Yeah, Yeah ,Yeah save it
Comment by SUGuy
2013-04-14 10:41:10
Pricing of a project is also dependant on the neighborhood, homeowner’s profession, type of cars in the driveway. Some people like to prove to the contractors that they can afford their services. They want to shower contractors with money. Home owners at times want to tell the neighbors how much they paid for a certain project. In return the contactor has to put on a show by having uniformed employees, nice clean lettered trucks etc. Pricing also involves a dog and pony show.
I remember the good old days when you could pick up a nice double wide for 60k.
The way to keep the price of building a home down is to do the labor yourself. unfortunately most people do not have the skills or the ability to work that hard these days.
“I paid $78 / sq ft for my HOUSE, which is right in line with these prices. A greater fraction of the value of my property is in the LAND”
The used building lot is worth much more than the old house built upon it. That is interesting, but I suspect very unlikely. Have you made this split up in your own mind? One of the advantages of buying a used house is that the building lot has been consumed, kind of like driving a car off the lot. It is worth a lot less than when it was virgin, because someone has had their way with it. So, you paid something like $200/ft2 for an old house? No doubt you got a place that makes you happy, or will when it is fixed up, and you can afford to bring the place up to date, and you can afford to pay two times what you “paid” because it was borrowed. You can afford it and that works for you.
If people could only pay what they could actually pay, well most of us wouldn’t even have a job, and houses wouldn’t be so expensive.
AP Exclusive: Likely tax cheats flock South, West
AP | 4/14/13
Worried the Internal Revenue Service might target you for an audit? You probably should be if you own a small business in one of the wealthy suburbs of Los Angeles.
You might also be wary if you’re a small-business owner in one of dozens of communities near San Francisco, Houston, Atlanta or the District of Columbia.
A new study by the National Taxpayer Advocate used confidential IRS data to show large clusters of potential tax cheats in these five metropolitan areas. The IRS uses the information to target taxpayers for audits.
The taxpayer advocate, Nina Olsen, runs an independent office within the IRS. She got access to the data as part of an effort to learn more about why some taxpayers are more likely to cheat than others.
The study also looked at tax compliance in different industries, and found that people who own construction companies or real estate rental firms may be more likely to fudge their taxes than business owners in other fields.
Many of the communities identified by the study are very wealthy, including Beverly Hills and Newport Beach in California. Others are more middle class, such as New Carrollton, Md., a Washington suburb, and College Park, Ga., home to a section of Atlanta’s massive airport.
It’s almost over, folks. China, via NoKo, has those big phalluses pointed at various targets. Will they pull the trigger? I dare ‘em.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-04-14 08:47:16
I’m in Colorado Springs right now. Maybe we’ll get nuked today.
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 11:03:16
Not sure it would be any safer here in San Diego, where Northrup Grumman has several office complexes a short drive away from home (stumbled across one of them by chance yesterday driving home from CostCo by the scenic route…).
The TurboTax defense
Rodney P. Mock and Nancy E. Shurtz
Published 4:00 am, Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2009, before the Senate Finance Committee hearing on his nomination. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AP
As April 15 approaches, we remember when the tax preparation software TurboTax first gained national recognition - the day in 2009 when Timothy Geithner was questioned by the Senate on his nomination to be the U.S. Treasury Secretary.
The IRS had discovered that Geithner had failed to pay his self-employment taxes (i.e., Social Security and Medicare) on his International Monetary Fund income. When questioned, he said he used TurboTax and that his returns were not prepared “in a way that caught” his embarrassing mistake. Fortunately for Geithner (although admittedly negligent), the IRS waived his tax penalties. Yet this type of waiver hardly is ever available to similarly situated taxpayers who would owe interest on their back taxes plus a 20 percent penalty.
Cases in the U.S. Tax Court indicate taxpayers have attempted to assert a tax software excuse for penalty relief, but except for two cases, their efforts have largely fallen on deaf ears. Yet, an argument can be made that the advice and guidance provided by tax software should be in most cases the equivalent of the advice of a tax preparer. It is possible that the advice had been programmed incorrectly into the software and thus it makes sense to allow the taxpayers some relief from the IRS’s arsenal of penalties.
The TurboTax defense was successful in Olsen vs. Commissioner, where the taxpayer failed to input into his tax software certain income from his wife’s beneficial interest in a trust because he was “unfamiliar with the form” the couple received. The court determined the “forthright and creditable” taxpayer simply made an “isolated error” in transcribing the information into the software, and thus, penalty relief was warranted.
…
Our last mortgage was 1998 originated, and we had to submit what 2banana said, plus more. They put us through the ringer and our FICOs were 800+. Our debt ratios had to pass the test. My, have times changed.
Insurance, at least property insurance in FL, seems to be a total ponzi scheme. I’m surprised what these morons are doing is even legal.
First off, it probably helps to talk very quickly about the “theory” of insurance (at least as I learned it in college). First, you have to figure out the value of the asset that you’re insuring. Pretty straightforward (and dropping, but we’ll leave that out for now), not a lot of argument around this.
Next, you figure out the risk of loss. The person who does this is known as an actuary, they look at historic numbers and determine, based on a lot of criteria, how likely a loss is of the given asset that they are underwriting.
So, real simple example; if I want to insure a 100K house and the risk of loss is 1% annually:
100K*1%=1K/yr
And then, on that 1K/yr, we then add the insurance company’s profit.
Why all this math in the morning?? Well, because, per that article “New policies, however, could rise between 60 percent and 84 percent in Palm Beach County for the same property.”
This makes absolutely NO SENSE. It also makes no sense that after a hurricane comes through people’s policies start to double. The only way that makes sense is if, instead of figuring out the risk, in fact, they are just running a ponzi; collecting all the premiums and paying out of the kitty until it’s empty. What this means is that the “risk of loss” number above is off by up to 84%?!? Why even hire people to compute that number, why not just pull it out of the air, it would apparently be just about as accurate.
A hurricane barreling through should, in fact (perfect insurance model) have no impact what-so-ever on your rates. It was figured in; hurricane damage every X years, to your rate ahead of time. In fact, the only thing that should really impact your rate is if you do something to YOUR home or personally that changes your risk profile (like put in a highly flammable roof in fire country, for example).
The highest insurance quote I got last year (after I got dropped again) was about 15K/yr, the lowest was 2.5K (coverage limits held pretty equal). That’s ridiculous people! That’s like shopping a few banks and getting MTG rate offers from 3 to 15%, depending where you shopped.
My experience in S. FL tells me that there’s something fundamentally wrong with the insurance market. It doesn’t make sense that one insurer would be so far off from another when comparing policies. They should all bunch up, perhaps with a few outliers on either end. Instead, what’s happening is that the “Mr Wizard” guys at State Farm have my house at a 10% chance of loss per year and at All State they have that number at 5%!? That makes NO sense (and even less if you extend my example to include the re-insurance market).
2banana-
We have no mortgage as you know, but to self insure is crazy, unless you have a money tree. We also have earthquake Insurance as So Ca residence.
Your premiums have been used to buy Bernanke Bucks (AKA US Treasuries) plus the insurance industry is one of the biggest players in the highly leveraged collateralize debt markets. You think AIG was a one-off? Nope. Pension funds and insurance companies are bag holders for the the sum of all fears - a 8% 10yr treasury yield would bankrupt them.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 15:07:56
“…8% 10yr treasury yield would bankrupt them…”
Luckily we won’t go there again until most of the pig-in-a-python Baby Boom cohort of retirees has gone through the pension system.
The insurance market in each state is regulated by a “state” agency that makes the rules and the regulations.
If you have regulations that cause insurance companies to loose more money, or if you have a few too many hurricanes, the insurance companies aren’t going to offer to insure at prices you deem acceptable.
It’s pretty simple. A lot of insurance companies lost their a$$e$ in FLA in the last 10 years, so they have to try and recoup their losses.
Living close the coast is also more costly. Why? Because the losses are higher there probably for a variety of reasons, not just the hurricanes.
What I found interesting is the Ca EQ Authority insurance and GeoVera (a private EQ insurance firm) had pretty close premium costs, but the CEA had a lower deducible for our area as I dug into it. CEA has a disclaimer on pg 1 of their policy, when they run out of loot your sol. With private insurance its a guessing game if they will honor the claim as well. Either way you are screwed. But we have it, since 11% of Californians are in the pool. Just found out renters can buy it too. High density policy holders are the real issue. I don’t like that.
Remember the reason Florida was originally explored by Europeans 500 years ago was in search of the Fountain of Youth. And greater fools have ever since wandered there in search of whatever elusive form of wealth they expected to find.
Interesting to read some of the headlines this fine AM. Anyone who doesn’t think NoKo is China’s proxy isn’t paying attention. Bwahahaha! But, you know, keep sending Owl Man to SoKo proclaiming “Stop! Or I’ll yell stop again!” Keep outsourcing there. Keep buying their defective crap. Keep insourcing their scientists and techies so they can engage in espionage. Keep borrowing from them.
“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.”
Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project
Harvey Ruvin Biography
On National and International Levels
Harvey Ruvin served as the President of the National Association of Counties (NACo) (1987-88). He chaired separate NACo Task Forces on Immigration, Environment and Energy, and the Liability Insurance crisis. NACo is the only national organization representing the interests and acting as a clearing house for the more than 3,000 county governments in America.
Ruvin is a past chairman and current member of the Urban Consortium (UC) of Public Technology, Inc. (PTI). PTI is the technology arm of its parents, the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties and the International City/County Management Association. The UC is a coalition of the Nation’s 50 largest urban government seeking to apply emerging technologies to local government needs.
In addition to his leadership of America’s Counties and the Urban Consortium, Ruvin’s service at the NATIONAL (where he has served five Presidents in an advisory capacity) and INTERNATIONAL level has included:
Member, Intergovernmental Science Engineering and Technology Advisory Panel to Office of Science Advisor to the President (Presidents Ford and Carter, 1975-80).
Member, President’s Council on Energy Efficiency, as well as Vice Chairman of Local Government Energy Policy Advisory Committee (President Carter, 1977-80).
Served a four-year term on the prestigious Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). He chaired the ACIR Research committee. (Presidents Reagan and Bush, 1987-91).
Served as a member of the President Clinton 1988-91 Sustainable Communities Task Force of the President’s Counc
il On Sustainable Development (PCSD).
Member, Board of Directors of the National Association of Counties (1983-present).
Member, Board of Directors of National Association of Regional Councils (1973-1978).
Member, Board of Directors of the Community Associations Institute (1978-1982).
Vice Chairman of National Immigration Forum (1980-1984).
Delegate to the United Nations World Congress for a Sustainable Future, representing America’s Counties at this first-ever international effort to coordinate local governments’ environmental initiatives (1990).
Vice Chairman, Executive Committee of ICLEI which is the 15 member governing body of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). ICLEI is membered by 600 local governments from all over the planet, seeking pro-active ways to combat global environmental and sustainability concerns. He serves as President of USA – ICLEI. Inc. – the corporate entity operating the organization’s efforts in America.
ICLEI has been designated to represent local government at all United Nations’ meetings dealing with the environment and sustainability.
300 million guns in the hands of American people now. 70 million of them purchased since Obamao’s first inauguration. My handguns and rifle will help me keep my individual rights a while longer.
It’s “Go Time” but not with guns. I find myself in the seemingly odd position of being led by a liberal Democrat woman who is openly gay.
In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.
OK, I get it. What now? What can I do?
AWARENESS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE RESISTANCE
First take a deep breath and realize that you are not alone in this. There are people all over your state, all over America, all over the world, who are with you.
You may be looking for a leader. Take a look in the mirror. This is the real face of grassroots. YOU.
To start, the best thing you can do is to read more and open your eyes to the workings of your town.
Amazingly enough, flyering is one of the most effective ways of reaching a large number of people in a short time. Get up early on a weekend morning and take these around different neighborhoods for a few weeks. Drop them on porches, don’t put them in mailboxes (they’re FEDERAL property, apparently). Don’t let people waylay you and draw you into conversation or you’ll waste your Saturday arguing instead of putting out the info. Tell them to go to the website on the flyer if they want more info. If they want to help tell them to make copies of the flyer and walk them around. Take the flyers with you to the store, coffee shop, meetings, and give them out. It only costs about $5 to make 100 black and white copies. Go for it!
If you’re a skeptic, and you should be, keep reading and asking the questions. Be a sharp researcher. If you read about a group that is advocating for SmartGrowth, for instance, take a look at who’s in the group. Google the names of the people running the organization. Follow those links. Who funds them? What influence do they have on your community? For instance, in our town, Santa Rosa, CA, there is a group that is trying to develop new neighborhood associations in conjunction with the City so that they can hand-pick neighborhood ‘leaders’ and shut out other voices. It’s called the Neighborhood Alliance, a group founded by the local president of the UN-USA Association. Didn’t know there was a local chapter of the United Nations in your town? Neither did we. What else? The other founder is the director of advocacy for the California Lung Association. A check of that group shows that they lobby the legislature for smart growth (that term means multi-story residential condos stacked on top of retail stores next to railway lines, proposed rail lines, or transit corridors, the preferred development style for Agenda 21). Surprised? We were. That explained why the Board of the neighborhood association went nuts when my partner was elected neighborhood president. They threatened her with a trial to remove her when they found out she and I had organized a group and sued to stop a local redevelopment project. You get the point.
That’s a typical example of the “research” Dumb Money does. Understandable. But when Dumb Money attempts to float it as real is when we step in to expose the ignorance.
Now… Months ago after this ruse was attempted, we did a quick review and mark up of this charade… here it is.
For the public…… Material and labor costs are the same anywhere in the country. Anywhere. Don’t let charlatans, paid hacks and dumb money detract you from performing your own analysis and estimate on the value of a house in price per square foot. We bid and win bridge and highway work in tens of millions of dollars based on price per square foot. There is no other way to do it.
Well the answer is quite simple really and it Debunks RAL’s statement…California has very high sales taxes…Oregon has none…So, effectively, the cost of materials are higher in California even if the product face value is the same in both states…
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pimp Watch
2013-04-14 10:25:49
Sales tax accounts for your fantasy of 3x construction costs? Once again, you’ve demonstrated you’re out of your league.
But we expect nothing less from a “contractor” who sources materials from Home Depot.
How is it that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA can offer federal mortgage guarantees for so much cheaper than private mortgage insurers do for the same level of default risk, yet remain competitive for their shareholders (U.S. taxpayers)?
The mortgage securities business has become a shell game. Consider the disconnect in pricing of credit guarantees between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, on the one hand, and the Federal Housing Administration on the other.
One of the important differences in pricing between the government-sponsored enterprises and FHA is that Fannie and Freddie adjust their prices to some degree for risk while FHA largely charges fees that are flat across risk attributes. And although FHA has raised upfront and annual mortgage insurance premiums since the crisis, the all-in pricing for a GSE mortgage-backed security and a corresponding Ginnie Mae MBS (which is where most FHA loans end up) leaves FHA the clear winner for the riskiest pools. In that regard, we are merely shifting risk from one set of federally insured entities (the GSEs as wards of the state) to another. There does not seem to be any apparent rhyme or reason to this pricing — one more piece of evidence of the lack of cohesion in pricing in federally dominated mortgage markets.
The issue is far more than academic. The latest actuary report estimates that the FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund is underwater by more than $16 billion although the Obama administration’s estimate released Wednesday places it now at just under $1 billion. If FHA employed a more granular pricing approach, charging much higher premiums for riskier attribute combinations and less for lower-risk attributes, it would reduce the risk of the agency’s troubled MMIF over time.
Look at the pricing decision between a pool of 95% loan-to-value, 660 FICO score fixed-rate 30-year mortgages going into a 3% coupon Fannie Mae or a comparable GNMA security. The Fannie bond was recently quoted at $104.09 per $100 of principal, the GNMA at $105.56. For this pool, Fannie would charge an “adverse” delivery fee of 25 basis points, a loan-level pricing adjustment of 225 basis points. And since the loans have such little equity and low credit scores, a private mortgage insurer would charge 350 basis points for the risk that it bears. For the same pool, FHA would charge an upfront premium of 175 basis points and an annual premium of 130 basis points. If we further assume that the pools have an effective life of five years, then that annual premium takes 650 basis points off the dollar price of the bond.
Taking into consideration origination and differential servicing costs that also affect the bond coupon, the net price of the Fannie MBS is 95.24 per $100 of principal while the GNMA MBS is $97.57. In this example, the higher-priced GNMA MBS is the “best execution” for delivery of 95% LTV, 660 mortgage pools.
This simple illustration of relative mortgage pricing underscores the need to revisit FHA’s approach to pricing and it has implications for the extent of the federal guarantee as well.
…
Does anyone know how much of a windfall GSE bond owners collectively reaped from Uncle Sam at the point when the federal guarantee went from implicit to explicit in the wake of the Fall 2008 Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac collapse, right at the point when the fools who speculated in these MBS should have lost their shirts?
Does the Fed own every dollar it prints, which it can then use to competitively bid on whatever dollar-valued asset sales happen to be taking place? This private ownership business gets very confusing when a single federal agency has monopoly rights to mine the Bitcoin of the realm.
Do the Fed’s QE3 MBS purchases, which presumably allow the GSEs to sell their MBS at inflated prices to the private market bid, get counted as “shoveled in” taxpayer bailout money? Because I am thinking that with proper accounting for $40 bn a month in Fed-funded MBS purchases, the U.S. taxpayer has probably “shoveled in” a lot more than $116 bn worth of GSE bailouts.
Perhaps the stealth tax of the Fed’s Bitcoin mint is different than the explicit tax that shows up on your W-2s, since nobody exactly knows up front who will ultimately pay it and how. Or does the operation of the Federal Reserve Bitcoin mint not count as “taxes,” since they have a money tree farm hidden away somewhere which they aren’t revealing?
Fannie Mae earned $17.2 billion in 2012, is biggest annual profit ever, which could mean dividends for taxpayers.
With Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both reporting record profits for 2012, taxpayers might be wondering if there’s any reward for bailing out the agencies blamed for the housing bust – that is, besides saving the global financial system from imminent ruin.
According to Fannie Mae CEO Tim Mayopoulos, the government-sponsored enterprises aren’t the only ones that will be rolling in the dough. In his first TV interview since the company reported a more than $17 billion profit for 2012, Mayopoulos told Bloomberg TV that U.S. taxpayers could actually see a net gain from the $116 billion they’ve shoveled into the beleaguered mortgage giant.
…
If it were that easy then should we draw the conclusion that using taxpayers money to support bankrupt institutions and corporations we can make lots of money.
What is behind this? Doesn’t anyone in the MSM ask how this unprecedented price support to housing works in the long term. Especially, when truly middle class people cannot afford a house. In the end, the economy should collapse when all every family does is work to pay for the house.
I always wondered what happened to az_lender last 2 posts from hbb search:
Comment by az_lender
2011-04-06 02:44:41
Time marches on. Five or six years ago I thought the housing market would turn up in 2012 or so. That was based partly on Ivy Zellman’s mortgage reset chart, and some general feeling that nothing lasts forever. But the actions of our govt have so slowed the crash that the recovery still seems far away. What, 2015? I don’t know.
I have a positive cash flow on the apartment building I bought last October, even though I rent ‘em out heated in Maine. Still collecting fuel oil on a prepaid contract I negotiated last fall; it’ll be a shock when that runs out. Guess I could raise the rents a teeny bit, but will first make sure everyone has window blinds.
Loan demand is very great. But I have to maintain SOME liquidity. So I keep telling you people, if anyone wants to get into lending out your own money at around 8% on small houses in Florida, email me mimigerstell at yahoo dot com. I would not take any cut but would walk you through a first deal. What’s in it for me is maintaining my good relations with the persons who bring me the potential clients.
Had a little hassle with some heirs when one of my clients died. The kids were fighting over her property and therefore could not agree about who should be paying me. A $1500 bill from my lawyer got them to wise up and sell the place in a hurry. It wasn’t underwater, so they still received some money.
Other than that, no problems since 2003. Oh yeah, there are people who need “workouts” - and I’m happy to reduce their payments a little bit, stretch out the amortization, whatever it takes to keep them paying their money!
Comment by az_lender
2012-10-30 03:10:51
Of those who were frequently posting on HBB 5-7 years ago, many became real-estate investors themselves after a time. I haven’t read the blog for a while, and I see in yesterday’s “bits bucket” a clash between bulls and bears. My personal opinion matches my present investment position. (a) I own an apartment building and (b) I own a lot of mortgage notes, as I have done for nearly 20 years. I am interested only in the income, which means I can afford a depreciation of a few percent per year, but not a rapid further bust. Nor do I expect it. Bump along the bottom is my best guess.
I don’t know the Fed charter, but I would think the real question would be “where does it specifically prohibit this?”
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 15:20:11
Where does it specifically prohibit them from personally loaning out trillions of dollars at below-market interest rates to all of their favorite banks across the globe? And if it isn’t expressly prohibited, then why don’t they just do it?
Hedge funds have their hands out for their shares of the $40 bn in Fed-funded MBS purchases.
Hedge Funds Wagering on Fannie Reincarnation: Mortgages
By Katherine Burton, Zeke Faux & Jody Shenn - Apr 8, 2013 2:07 PM
April 3 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Representative Scott Garrett, a Republican from New Jersey and chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, talks about the outlook for the housing market and his proposal to wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac without disrupting the market. Garrett, speaking with Erik Schatzker and Scarlet Fu on Bloomberg Television’s “Market Makers,” also discusses the potential imposition of legal restrictions on banks deemed too big to fail. (Source: Bloomberg)
Investors including hedge funds are buying the preferred stock of government-controlled mortgage firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a long-shot bet they will have a future as private companies.
Fannie Mae (FNMA)’s 8.25 percent of preferred shares have more than doubled this year after the company reported record earnings. Some investors see the odds rising the two loan guarantors may somehow return to private ownership without cutting out existing investors, according to Bose George, an analyst at Keefe Bruyette & Woods in New York. The securities have a par value of $25, meaning investors could recoup more than five times the current price of $4.26.
“The idea is eventually, as these companies have paid back their debt to the government, they could potentially be turned back on,” George said. “From our perspective, you can only make an argument for this if you think the government’s going to change the rules somehow to benefit the preferred shareholders.”
The gains come after the U.S. Treasury Department changed the terms of the enterprises’ bailout last year to force them to turn over profits to the government. The agreement provides no mechanism for them to repay the $187.5 billion they owe the government from their 2008 bailout, a prerequisite to a change in their status.
…
Cyprus Bailout Deal Is Hit By New Fears A warning about political meddling in the independence of the country’s central bank raises fresh doubts over the rescue.
2:17pm UK, Sunday 14 April 2013
A bank employee shouts slogans and holds a banner reading in Greek: “employees are paying”
Cyprus’ central bank governor has warned he will only work with ministers on the country’s EU bailout if the bank’s independence is respected.
The comments from governor Panicos Demetriades come following a rift in Nicosia between the bank and political leaders over the EU/IMF-brokered bailout.
Last week, the government said the total bailout cost had jumped 6bn euros (£5.1bn) to 23bn (£19.6bn).
Mr Demetriades was appointed last May by the communist former administration but tension with the ruling centre-right government, in power for just two months, has deepened.
There has been growing pressure on him to resign over his handling of the economic crisis amid an unprecedented levy placed on bank accounts.
…
The reason why central banks bought gold in large quantities last year should be obvious by now: TO FINANCIALLY ENGINEER A GOLD PRICE PREMIUM WHICH COULD BE USED TO FUND SOVEREIGN DEBT BAILOUTS OFF THE PROCEEDS OF GOLD SALES.
It’s really a beautiful plan, as the “tax” to fund bailouts was willingly paid by those who participated in gold speculation during a parabolic bubble price blowout. What better way is there to raise taxes than on a voluntary basis?
And in case you are missing this, there is no reason the same bubble engineering principle could not be used by central banks to raise taxes in other asset classes, then profit off the proceeds of asset sales before taking away the punch bowl that was used to foster the irrational exuberance needed to get greater fools to willingly purchase bubble-valued assets.
(Reuters) - Heavily indebted euro zone nations such as Italy and Portugal could come under pressure to put their bullion reserves to work as a result of plans for Cyprus to sell gold to meet its financing needs.
A European Commission assessment of what Cyprus needs to do as part of its European Union/International Monetary Fund bailout showed Cyprus is expected to sell in excess gold reserves to raise around 400 million euros ($523 million).
Other struggling euro area countries may be pushed to take note. Between them, for example, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain, hold more than 3,230 metric tons (3561 tons) of gold between them, worth nearly 125 billion euros at today’s prices.
The lion’s share of that - 2,451.8 metric tons - belongs to Italy. But Portugal and Spain also hold hundreds of metric tons and gold is currently trading around $1,558.95 per ounce in spot terms, or 1,189 euros.
The metal makes up more than 90 percent of Portugal’s foreign exchange holdings, and 72.2 percent of Italy’s. India, by contrast, holds less than 10 percent of its reserves in gold.
Gold sales on their own would be far from a magic bullet to solve euro zone financing problems: Italy’s entire gold reserves, for example, are worth less than 95 billion euros, against outstanding debt of around 1.685 trillion euros.
But the Cyprus situation shows that even a relatively small gold sale may help address severe debt problems. Cyprus’ gold sale would allow it to easily come up with around 3 percent of what it must contribute to the bailout.
It is something that has the market somewhat concerned given that a big sale would push down the price. Central bank gold buying was one of the few areas of demand to increase last year at a time jewelry, coin and gold-bar buying was on the wane.
…
April 13, 2013 By The Doc 33 Comments
*BREAKING
5 million ounces of annual silver supply and 500,000 ounces of annual gold supply have just been vaporized landslided.
Rio Tinto’s Kennecott mine in Utah- the US’ 2nd largest silver mine and world’s largest copper mine has just suffered a massive landslide which will likely shut down production at the mine for years as upwards of 1 billion tons of dirt and ore have collapsed into the basin.
10% of US annual silver production just vanished. Good thing there aren’t any physical supply issues in silver currently or anything…
Astonishing Photos below:
According to Rio Tinto’s VP of Marketing Vania Grandi, Kennecott produces up to 5 million ounces of silver, and 1/2 million ounces of gold annually:
“We produce about 3 (million) to 5 million ounces of silver a year and 300,000 to 500,000 ounces of gold,” said Vania Grandi, vice president of marketing for the Precious Metals Copper Group at Rio Tinto — parent company of Kennecott Utah Copper Corp.
At 9.30 pm local time on 10 April 2013, Kennecott Utah Copper’s Bingham Canyon Mine experienced a slide along a geotechnical fault line of its north eastern wall. Movement on the north eastern wall had accelerated in recent weeks and pre-emptive measures were taken to relocate facilities and roads prior to the slide. All employees are safe and accounted for.
Mine operations are currently suspended while experts assess the extent of the slide and impact on operations.
About Rio Tinto
Rio Tinto is a leading international mining group headquartered in the UK, combining Rio Tinto plc, a London and New York Stock Exchange listed company, and Rio Tinto Limited, which is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange.
Rio Tinto’s business is finding, mining, and processing mineral resources. Major products are aluminium, copper, diamonds, thermal and metallurgical coal, uranium, gold, industrial minerals (borax, titanium dioxide and salt) and iron ore. Activities span the world and are strongly represented in Australia and North America with significant businesses in Asia, Europe, Africa and South America.|
From VisitUtah.org:
In addition to copper, the mine also produces about 400,000 ounces of gold, 4 million ounces of silver and 20 million pounds of molybdenum.
Located 28 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, the mine is 2 3/4-miles across and 3/4-mile deep. It is so big that it can be seen from outer space. Standing at the overlook within the Bingham Canyon Mine, you can see, hear, and feel the breathtaking and awesome magnitude of this massive man-made excavation. Kennecott Utah Copper’s Bingham Canyon Mine is the world’s largest man-made excavation!
This may be the next book I tackle, once I finish the last1250 pages of Les Miserables.
Review: The Robespierres of central banking
By Dominic Elliott
April 5, 2013
By Dominic Elliott
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
The most lasting inheritance of the 2008 financial crisis may be a change in the purpose of central banks. From the 1980s until 2007, most believed that monetary authorities should primarily use a policy interest rate to combat inflation. Interventions in the markets or in the financial system were outside the remit, or so the orthodox view went. Neil Irwin’s “The Alchemists” shows how that thinking has been turned on its head.
Central banks now have vast power. The European Central Bank, led by Jean-Claude Trichet, flouted the spirit of the Maastricht Treaty by buying bonds of euro zone states; Mervyn King’s independent Bank of England became part of the political debate as it engaged in monetary easing on a vast scale; and Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve has experimented with even more radical and creative ways to fix the U.S. economy. Irwin, a Washington Post journalist, underscores just how revolutionary those moves were.
The book breezes through central banking’s troubled history, starting with the first central banker, Johan Palmstruch, a jailed debtor who assumed a new identity. He plunged Sweden into an economic depression and died a much-reviled man. Reichsbank President Rudolf van Haverstein’s unfortunate penchant for monetising German debt during World War One was another low point.
Irwin really provides spice, however, with a blow-by-blow account of the financial crisis and its aftermath. There’s a fine level of detail: Mervyn King dog-sledding at a central bankers’ convention in the remote Canadian territory of Iqaluit, for example. Central banking seems sexy after all, even if the claim that French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s walk at Deauville with German Chancellor Angela Merkel was the “most consequential stroll on a beach in history” is exaggerated.
Still, it’s an achievement to produce a page-turner that also explains the various ideologies of central banking. In essence, central banking has been a game of trial and error. And the seat-of-the-pants decision-making in the euro zone involved many strange manoeuvres. Bundesbank head Axel Weber reneged on his support of Trichet’s bond-buying plan, placing the euro zone in even greater peril. Meanwhile, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the International Monetary Fund, was promising bailout money before he was authorised to do so.
Of the book’s three main protagonists – Trichet, Bernanke and King – only the U.S. Fed chairman comes out remotely well. His openness to new ideas is contrasted with King’s stubbornness and Trichet’s self-importance.
The author could have done more to consider the negative effects of flooding the global economy with cheap money. The concept of eurobonds – an important possible way to fix European finance – is also dismissed without comment. But China’s lack of central banking independence is highlighted as an important counterweight to the Western approach: the government’s authoritarian control of monetary policy helped the Chinese economy snap back with barely a blip post-crisis.
…
The one fundamental truism of investing, and the one most often ignored, is this: the higher the returns, the higher the risk.
The past is littered with examples of when that rule was ignored. The stocks of dot-com companies raced to stratospheric heights in the late 1990s, until they came crashing to the ground. After a decade of astonishing growth in value, junk bonds defaulted en masse in 1989. Values in the housing market zoomed for years, until they grew unsteady in 2006 and then collapsed in 2008. The bottom-line message of history is that, if you’re doubling and tripling your money in record time, you’re also more likely to lose it all.
For those who don’t know about Bitcoins, they are a brilliant technical concept designed to create a new, digital currency that essentially cuts out the middleman—values of Bitcoins are established online, peer to peer. There are no central banks, and at least for now, there is no government involvement. Like standard currency, Bitcoins can be traded or used for purchases, but only with those sellers who will accept them. Because it is a system independent of external meddling, there can be no sudden devaluation of Bitcoins through the actions of governments. (But make no mistake—there can be sudden devaluation of the currency through the actions of players in the Bitcoin market, and too many of them seem not to realize it. More on that below.) The values are not pegged to any existing currency; instead, members in the Bitcoin market establish the exchange rate through simple supply and demand—when the number of people wanting Bitcoins grows faster than the availability, the values go up.
…
The most interesting thing about Bitcoin is that it was created in response to the financial crisis of 2008 and a purposeful attempt to make a new currency that is not controllable by governments.
The gentle breezes of anarcho capitalism are occurring worldwide. I see this as a race between two competing pushes: one, a push by United Nations for a dictatorial world government and two, a push for freeing man from men. My bet is on the latter. But precious metals will reign as currency.
Once many competitor techno-anarcho currencies to Bitcoin spring up, Bitcoin will become virtually worthless, as it dawns on even the densest technogeek with the least economics education that the unlimited and unregulated supply of virtual currency can rapidly lead to competitive devaluation.
The techno-geek community seems overly fixated on the “slow-mining” process which governs Bitcoin creation, not recognizing that there is a potential for copy-cat Bitcoin currencies to spring up at any time.
Mark my word: By this time next year, there will be rival versions of Bitcoin in circulation…
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-04-14 10:46:12
I agree.
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 11:27:53
To take my point a step further, as you yourself might point out, gold has no close substitutes, while Bitcoin potentially has many close substitutes.
There really is no choice between gold and Bitcoin as a long-term store of value; if your interest is to engage in short-term bubble gambles, that is another matter entirely.
Once many competitor techno-anarcho currencies to Bitcoin spring up, Bitcoin will become virtually worthless
I disagree, PB. The overproduction of some _other_ virtual currency does not undermine the value of Bitcoin in any way—it merely affects the exchange rate between the two. The posited other virtual currency will become worthless, not the Bitcoin.
This is identical to having only one central bank over-producing one single fiat currency. The result is that THAT currency become devalued, but it does not devalue all fiat currencies. Other currencies merely gain strength in the relative exchange rate between the two.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 11:47:03
Read up on the economics of close substitutes and get back to us with a follow-up report.
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 11:48:44
P.S. Contrary to popular beliefs, there are fundamental and legal limits on how much fiat money can be created before serious problems ensue. Though the same fundamental issues face virtual currencies, the legal constraints are absent.
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-04-14 12:10:22
Read up on the economics of close substitutes and get back to us with a follow-up report.
A virtual currency that does not have the same guarantees against over-production is NOT a close substitute; thinking that it is is an error.
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-04-14 12:11:58
Contrary to popular beliefs, there are fundamental and legal limits on how much fiat money can be created before serious problems ensue.
Remind me of what the legal limit is on the production of fiat Federal Reserve Notes?
And can you please translate that into a maximum total number of dollars that will ever be produced—e.g. guaranteed never to be exceeded?
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 15:30:16
A virtual currency that does not have the same guarantees against over-production is NOT a close substitute; thinking that it is is an error.
Assuming there is not a small army of techno-geeks strewn across the planet who could come up with alternative schemes to create currencies with built-in technical safeguards against over-production is an error. For a basic example, consider the fact that even the Fed has mulled over the idea of automating money growth in order to reduce or eliminate human discretion from the monetary policy equation. Note this would have the undesirable side effect of effectively taking away the guns which too-big-to-fail Megabanks can currently aim at the FOMC in order to extract bailouts.
A great ideal that will never be fully realized as the nature of mankind is the brutish enslavement of others if given half a chance.
All that can ever be done is to minimize it and stay vigilant.
The signers of the Declaration of Independence knew and understood this.
As for BItcoin, think Flooze or Beenz. Realpolitik is that money, no matter anyone’s opinion, is always backed the country’s military might that issues it.
Isn’t it interesting how, even though Bitcoin is a “virtual currency,” the geek cult who trade in it felt the need to create a physical version of the coinage? Don’t they realize that if it exists in physical form, the government could potentially CONFISCATE IT?
And here is an even worse reason to for Bitcoin buyers to be afraid: Given the utter anonymity of Bitcoin transactions, there is no reason a central bank could not use a flood of fiat money to create a Bitcoin bubble, sucking in lots of wealth from the sidelines out of the pockets of geeks who think they will profit from the bubble. The central bank can be the first to sell, profiting handsomely off the premium sale price and leaving individual bubble speculators holding the bag on the price collapse. Like the vile Winklevii…
I note this is basically the Wall Street stock sales business model, appropriated by sovereign banks with massive financial fire power.
Mike Caldwell, a 35-year-old software engineer, looks over bitcoin tokens at his shop in Sandy, Utah. Caldwell mints physical versions of bitcoins, cranking out homemade tokens with codes protected by tamper-proof holographic seals. An actual coin is pictured above today’s article, although physical coins aren’t necessary in bitcoin transactions. (Credit: AP)
WASHINGTON, April 12, 2013 – Bitcoin, the hot, sort-of-but-not-exactly-new virtual currency seems to be going the way of oil and gold this morning: down. At last check this morning, a bitcoin was worth $60. Not bad, you say? No, not good. Just this past Wednesday, one bitcoin peaked out at $266 per coin before tanking, hitting a low of $120. Thursday, bitcoins endured a “trading halt” on one of its largest exchanges—known at “Mt. Gox”—that lasted for half a day. That didn’t stem the tide, though, as bitcoins have lost nearly 80% of their value in just two trading days. And we thought Apple options were volatile.
As a so-called virtual currency, a bitcoin is made up of digital bits and is allegedly based on cutting-edge mathematical algorithms meant to guard it against counterfeiting. Interestingly, it also appears to have been founded on an old idea, now dismissed by mainstream economists, about how a currency should operate—an idea that could be setting bitcoins up for an abrupt plunge.
Bitcoin was started in 2009 as a currency free from government controls, an entirely digital means of exchange for a digital age. It’s a rapidly growing phenomenon that has taken root as a payment method on some websites for both legal and illegal goods. The entire phenomenon seems to be a weird amalgamation of anarchism—born, in this case, due to an increasing distrust in some quarters of rapidly-debased fiat currencies like the dollar—and “Going Galt,” a process detailed in Ayn Rand’s controversial novel Atlas Shrugged, whereby an entrepreneurial genius goes underground in protest of increasing world socialism, taking the captains of productive capitalism with him in order to evade statist control.
On another level, though, bitcoins are the latest, techiest example of the 1960s’ energizing but ultimately failed hippie culture. In this case, however, it’s tech wienies and their philosophical soul mates who are using, effectively, a conjectural currency to do a John Galt on the system. On the other hand, you could probably argue that Ben Bernanke is doing the same thing via the Fed, although the Fed chair at least has a veneer of legitimacy to back up his efforts.
Yet bitcoins are also different from the “Federal Reserve Notes” we carry in our wallets and purses. They can be extraordinarily volatile for at least two key reasons, both of which we’ve seen this week.
Each bitcoin was typically worth less than $10 for most of the currency’s history. But this week the value surged past $200 - with the recent bailout crisis in Cyprus seen by many as one of the triggers of the surge. Wednesday saw a “flash crash,” as the value dipped close to $100 before recovering. Point one, then, is that this “currency” behaves more like a stock or a commodity than a so-called legitimate currency backed by a recognized government entity.
The meteoric rise and fall in bitcoin value this week is also linked to what some economists say is the biggest problem with the currency: that the supply of bitcoins increases only slowly, at a rate that’s coded into the system, which is our second point.
That’s a contrast to a regular paper currency like the dollar, whose supply is managed by a central bank like the Federal Reserve. The Fed engineers the dollar supply to increase slightly faster than the growth of the economy, which means that the value of the dollar falls slightly every year, in the phenomenon known as inflation.
…
Winklevoss twins amass huge Bitcoin haul as bubble bursts
Tyler, left, and Cameron Winklevoss are big supporters of digital currency Bitcoin. (Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times) Your take?
Are Bitcoins a good investment?
Yes 21%
No 79%
By Andrea Chang
April 12, 2013, 12:48 p.m.
The Winklevii are back, and this time they’re not talking about Facebook.
Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss — the Harvard twins who have argued for years that Mark Zuckerberg stole the idea for Facebook from them — this week told the New York Times that they had massive holdings, at one point valued at $11 million, in virtual currency Bitcoin.
The public backing by two widely recognized players in the tech world, combined with Bitcoin’s soaring — and now crashing — value, has forced the secretive digital money into the spotlight.
Bitcoin is known as the world’s first decentralized digital currency and was created four years ago by someone (or possibly more than one person) known by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Owners can buy and sell the currency, transfer it to others via the Internet and use it to buy digital and physical goods (although that is still in the early stages).
Bitcoin has been of particular interest this month as the dollar value of the virtual currency skyrocketed from $25 just two months ago to $266 on Wednesday.
But since then, Bitcoin’s value has plummeted as the bubble burst for the highly speculative currency. The coins were trading for as low as $54.25 on Friday, meaning the Winklevii have taken a huge hit on their investment.
Then again, when the twins first bought into Bitcoin last summer, the dollar value of the digital currency was in the single digits. And, with their multimillion-dollar settlement with Facebook, they can certainly afford some ups and downs in the market.
Well this is the current argument about why owning gold is a bad idea. Central bankers pump and dump. The deal today is that international central bankers are competing with each other. The most solvent banks do not dump gold. The least solvent dump gold. Draghi told Cyprus to sell its gold.
The brave individuals on main street merely yawn and regularly buy precious metals bullion. Bitcoin is just a blip and will be replaced. Hard currency will survive. Someone can please use statistics to try and prove otherwise. Won’t happen. Not with the history of precious metals.
It is arrogant for gold detractors to announce the death of precious metals as currency.
I hope you aren’t suggesting I am one of the detractors who has announced the death of gold as currency, because if so, you are mistaken.
Gold will always be traded as long as there are humans around to trade it, though it will trade at much lower values once the panic premium deflates. And don’t take my word for it — no less than Goldman Sachs predicts further gold price erosion dead ahead.
If you learned nothing else by now from over more than half a decade of reading and posting here, you should have learned that bubbles and their denouement can play out over longer time horizons than the speculators who try to profit off them can remain in the game.
Exhibit A: The Japanese stock market, which so far has failed to recover from the early-1990s collapse after nearly a quarter of a century. The collapse phase at this point has approached if not exceeded a typical speculator’s effective investing lifetime.
Exhibit B: Gold prices peaked at over $800 an ounce in the early 1980s, then deflated to just north of $300 nominal over the next two decades, by around 2000, with much larger inflation-adjusted losses. Next the price rocketed up to $1890 an ounce by late 2011, in what had to have been one of the most rapid real asset price ascents in history, given relatively low inflation over the past decade. Whether the subsequent 20%+ correction will last or will flip into another decade of volatile appreciation remains to be seen, but the rate of ascent to the 2011 peak leaves me wondering whether this time is different. One thing seems certain: Once the current gold bubble pops, and the price dynamics revert to the slow leak pattern seen from 1980-2000, dollar cost averaging will not help except to slow the falling knife’s rate of descent compared to if you made a lump sum investment in gold up front.
I further see no reason our hapless landlords and other housing bubble speculators might not face a long, painful period of sustained losses, bolstered by a cargo cult faith that they might someday, somehow get back the money they blew when they bought a U.S. residential real estate investment at peak bubble price levels circa 2005.
The special reasons driving the gold boom of the last decade have gone. It’s time to sell gold, not buy.The special reasons driving the gold boom of the last decade have gone. It’s time to sell gold, not buy.
The Indian price of gold has risen six folds in the last decade, fueling a record speculative import spree. Soaring gold imports have hit $42 billion in the first ten months of 2012-13, pushing the current account deficit to near-disaster levels. The finance minister is wringing his hands in distress, while housewives say that buying gold was the best thing they ever did.
Sorry, but the party is over. The notion that gold is the finest investment, whose value can only go up, is dead wrong. History shows that gold fluctuates crazily, so it can look a fabulous investment for some time and then become a total disaster. There’s nothing safe about it.
The Indian price reached a peak of Rs 33,000 per 10gm in late 2011. It has since fallen steadily to just Rs 29,000. Global trends suggest we have entered an era of falling or stagnant gold prices. Housewives and all other buyers beware: gold will probably be a lousy investment in the next decade.
After the US went off the gold standard in 1971, gold shot up from $35/ounce to $835 in 1980. It looked the best investment in sight. But then its price crashed and stayed down till 2001, at around just $250/ounce. Gold investors lost their shirts (and sometimes underpants) for two decades.
However, after 2003 gold zoomed again. It reached a new peak of $1,890 in late 2011. But it has fallen steeply to just $1,501 last Friday. It may bounce back temporarily , but will then fall again.
The fall in price has been less dramatic in India because the rupee has depreciated against the dollar. Even so, gold in rupee terms is down 10% from its peak. Goldman Sachs estimates that the world price will fall sharply to $1,270 by the end of 2014, and other analysts are almost as gloomy.
Gold is a safe haven to which people rush in troubled times, so speculators hoped its price would rise in today’s troubled conditions. North Korea is threatening nuclear war and Japan seeks to double its money supply. Cyprus has set a dangerous precedent by confiscating uninsured large deposits in its top banks, and this could have prompted a rush into gold. Why, then, has gold fallen instead of rising?
First, fears of a Eurozone breakdown took gold to a peak in 2011, but those fears are mostly gone, so gold is less needed as a safe haven. Second, the US is finally set, after five years, to end its quantitative easing of money supply, reducing the monetary fuel of speculators.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-04-14 10:25:20
These are troubled times. In the larger realm, although seeming simple, it is a struggle between individual liberty (spontaneous order) that erases borders on the one hand and world government (that also erases borders) that makes every human an equal serf.
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-04-14 10:26:56
Precious metals currency will win in a libertarian world. And we will get that.
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 10:59:44
“…that makes almost every human an equal serf.”
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
I’m trying to get my brain around the technical difference between Bitcoin and information age virtual Federal Reserve Notes. Some of the things I am reading are not much help:
“…bitcoins are the latest, techiest example of the 1960s’ energizing but ultimately failed hippie culture. In this case, however, it’s tech wienies and their philosophical soul mates who are using, effectively, a conjectural currency to do a John Galt on the system. On the other hand, you could probably argue that Ben Bernanke is doing the same thing via the Fed, although the Fed chair at least has a veneer of legitimacy to back up his efforts.
…”
The Washington Times, April 12, 2013
This 12 April 2013 Washington Times article is great on many levels:
…
In other words, as we always advise in this column anyway, whether you think bitcoins are the way of the future or still believe in the magic of traditionally valued stocks, bonds, and commodities, travel at your own risk. Tulips and residential real estate were the way to go. For awhile. That may also be the case with bitcoins.
As to the actual stock market this morning, it’s a mixed bag. The bitcoin mess, even though it’s not directly connected to Wall Street trading, added a bit of uncertainty to this morning’s market tone, as did the Fed’s weird, accidental release of information earlier this week, when we learned there’s at least the possibility that some 154 individuals and/or institutions may be receiving and may have been receiving special Fed info in advance of you and moi. We’re, shocked. Shocked.…
Virtual Federal Reserve Notes can be produced without any limit, other than the political.
Bitcoin cannot be produced so easily—it requires the actual computation of a non-trivial math problem to create them. The key is that it is hard to compute or forge, but cheap and easy to verify.
Everyone understands how dollars work, but who understands Bitcoins? You can’t even find the information on Wikipedia.
One thing is for certain: This currency will not go very far if only a few geeks know how to trade in it, due to fundamental liquidity constraints on its use.
There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.
Exactly. And you can bet your last dollar that governments can and will figure out a way to tax them. I already described one potential informal tax above (central banks and other strong hands blowing Bitcoin bubbles to suck in unwitting weak handed speculators, then pulling the plug first to cash in on knifeholders’ losses).
Given the utter anonymity of Bitcoin transactions, there is no reason a central bank could not use a flood of fiat money to create a Bitcoin bubble, sucking in lots of wealth from the sidelines out of the pockets of geeks who think they will profit from the bubble.
Isn’t this true of every asset class—in other words, what you describe has absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin.
You are describing the fundamental nature of fiat currency.
There are rules governing the relationship between fiat currencies and the value of goods and services they can purchase, which do not apply to Bitcoin. We can argue about how much these rules actually bind policy, but they definitely are definitely relevant to the comparison.
There are rules governing the relationship between fiat currencies and the value of goods and services they can purchase,
Huh? What rules?
I thought all of the rules about fiat currency and its value went out the window with QE, when the Fed began producing them at will out of thin air in order to bolster preferred asset classes.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 15:54:08
Despite QE1, QE2 and QE3-to-infinity-and-beyond, inflation remains low. I know this is true because FOMC members say so.
Fed doves play down threat of U.S. inflation
The Federal Reserve Building stands in Washington April 3, 2012. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
By Jonathan Spicer and Alister Bull
Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:02pm EDT
(Reuters) - Federal Reserve policymakers went out of their way on Saturday to play down the risk that aggressive measures to bolster the U.S. economy would lead to inflation in the future, in a clear signal of support for its ongoing actions to spur growth.
The U.S. central bank last month maintained a controversial program of buying $85 billion of bonds a month, while pledging to keep interest rates near zero until unemployment hits at least 6.5 percent, so long as inflation stays under 2.5 percent.
Two of the central bank’s most dovish officials - Chicago Federal Reserve boss Charles Evans and Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota - pushed back against recent signals from Fed hawks who want to taper those bond purchases.
“Without signs of actual inflation, many inflation-risk discussions ultimately raise this specter of … unlocking the long-ago-vanquished inflation demons from the dungeon,” said Evans, a voting member of the Fed’s policy committee this year.
“We have to monitor it, we have to be mindful, but I don’t think we should obsess over it,” he told an event in Boston.
Minutes of the Fed’s March 19-20 meeting, released on Wednesday, indicated that “many” of its 19 policymakers thought the pace of bond buying could be slowed in coming months, provided the nation’s labor market continues to improve.
However, data released since that meeting showed disappointingly small U.S. job growth in March and an unemployment rate of 7.6 percent, which was actually down from 7.7 percent the month before but only because people gave up looking for work.
The Fed’s preferred inflation measure is around 1.3 percent, well below its 2 percent target.
Kocherlakota, like-minded and speaking alongside Evans, argued that a balanced policy approach would allow inflation to deviate somewhat from its official 2 percent inflation goal, in order to lower U.S. unemployment.
“A balanced approach would allow for deviations of inflation from its longer run goal in order to facilitate a faster decline in unemployment back to its desired level,” Kocherlakota said.
Kocherlakota is alone in advocating for even more accommodation from the Fed in the form of lowering to 5.5 percent, from 6.5 percent currently, the “threshold” at which the central bank will consider raising rates from near zero.
…
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 16:05:33
There is actually a body of research, some of it written by Federal Reserve Bank economists, on “Rules vrs Discretion,” which explain policy actions in terms of the costs of following the rules (”commitment costs”) or breaking them (”weasel costs”).
Should be required reading for married men, as many of the same principles which apply to central banking policy are also useful in the marriage arena.
If they sell their gold, they are left with toilet paper. Supposedly this is the reason for the sell off Friday. Cyprus has no resources other than being a money laundering place. If their gold is gone and since they permanently chased away tax evaders their future is fuster clucked.
If the gold detractors are right, why is gold still held by central bankers?
Buying gold is getting to be more lucrative. I hope the price falls to $1300.
Perhaps Goldman Sachs is too gloomy in their dismal gold price forecast? Here is a sunnier one to buoy the hopes of those who believe gold is not yet through with its current runup.
That said, one should always be cautious about the dangers of short-term trend extrapolation, as future asset prices are fundamentally unpredictable.
As gold prices hit a 2012 record of $1,787.40 per ounce on Friday, Bank of America Merrill Lynch analysts said the precious metal could soar to $3,000 or even $5,000 over the longer-term.
“We will be focusing in on gold. Ultimately we think gold can trade between $3,000 and $5,000 an ounce going forward,” MacNeil Curry, head of foreign-exchange and rates technical strategy at BAML, told CNBC’s “Worldwide Exchange.”
“Certainly not within the next few months, but on a long-term basis we are on a well-defined uptrend, and we have got more to run before that runs its course.”
Sabine Schels, senior director and head of fundamental commodity research at BAML, added: “The best long story for commodity markets right now is gold. In the type of aggressive monetary policy easing environment we have right now, post what the Fed has done with an open-ended QE, and what the ECB has done, you really want to be invested in gold.”
Schels forecast gold prices would reach $2,000 within six months, before rising to $2,400 by the end of 2014.
…
In the long run, liberty will win. That will take at least ten years. Most Americans still choose to initiate force against each other through their agent: government.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-04-14 12:20:23
In the long run, liberty will win.
You, my friend, are a seriously-deluded optimist.
My bet is that we will get more and more of the same things we have been getting in recent memory—e.g. less liberty.
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-04-14 13:10:31
So does this mean you happily initiate force? Or does it mean you are well aware your agents (politicians you vote for) I intimate force, but are still happy to vote for them?
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-04-14 13:12:42
Gah! Initiate!
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-04-14 15:27:24
So does this mean you happily initiate force?
Heck no, Bill—my guess would be that we vote fairly similarly.
I merely meant that I don’t share your sense of optimism regarding the future of liberty.
I view liberty as something that is always in flux. Here’s an analogy that just occurred to me: liberty is like leverage. Both fluctuate over time.
Leverage is at a low right after a Minsky moment, when the weak hands get flushed; it increases steadily over years of stability, eventually provoking that Minsky moment.
Liberty fluctuates similarly. It is at its highest immediately after a revolution, and then year after year it is slowly chiseled away, until the people cannot tolerate it any more and rise up in revolt.
“I still think gold prices will go to $3,000 per ounce in the next five years if the central bankers continue to do what they are doing now.”
That’s a reasonable conjecture, except for one potential problem: FOMC inflation hawks are already discussing the point when they will take away the punch bowl. Which might mean one of the following:
1) They really do plan to take away the punch bowl within the next few years, and are trying to soften the blow by openly warning the populace.
2) They are playing a fooling game, by creating the expectation for near-term punch bowl removal which they can later defuse in order to extract wealth out of those who believed them and went long into fixed dollar-denominated investments, as the dashing of these expectations through a “longer-than-expected” period of QE3 would naturally lead to another runup in risk-on assets (gold, stocks, etc) to the detriment of risk-off assets (savings accounts, Treasurys, money-market funds, etc).
3) They really do mean to stick to the plan of ending QE3 when unemployment drops far enough (6.5%), which introduces another wild card of uncertainty to the future of monetary policy.
Which door will it be, ladies and gents, number 1), number 2) or number 3)?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 11:18:12
Financial Times of London
Last updated: April 10, 2013 10:03 pm
Fed leaks rate-setting minutes to banks
By Robin Harding in Washington and Tom Braithwaite and Stephen Foley in New York
The Federal Reserve leaked the minutes of its last rate-setting meeting to bank lobbyists as well as congressional aides and trade associations.
On Wednesday the Fed published its March minutes in the morning rather than the afternoon as had been scheduled. The central bank said it was doing so because they had already been accidentally released on Tuesday afternoon to a distribution list, comprising “mostly congressional staffers and trade association members in Washington”.
However, on Wednesday afternoon, the Fed published that list, which included lobbyists at Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup, among other banks.
Though the list was predominantly comprised of staffers to members of Congress, it also included a significant number of employees working for banks, opening the possibility that they could have passed on the information to traders.
Staff at Fifth Third, Barclays, Regions Financial, Wells Fargo, Citi, UBS, US Bancorp, Goldman, JPMorgan and PNC Financial all received the minutes early. Naomi Camper, one of JPMorgan’s top lobbyists, was among the recipients.
Two banks whose lobbyists received the email said they had found no evidence that the minutes had been distributed to other employees or used as a basis for trading.
The potential damage may have been limited by the fact that the minutes contained no explosive revelations. It showed participants were ready to slow the QE3 programme of asset purchases in the summer or early autumn. Weak payrolls data, however, may already have changed plans.
“Many” participants at the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee said continued labour market improvement should prompt a QE slowdown “at some point over the next several meetings”.
…
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-04-14 12:22:33
Which door will it be, ladies and gents, number 1), number 2) or number 3)?
My vote is on door number 2; they are talking down long-term inflation expectations, but will ease until they are absolutely forced to stop.
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 15:49:12
Unfortunately, though I love it not, I find door number 2 most likely. With a great big crash to follow when and if the door is ever slammed shut.
Gold is still dropping, though I am a bit confused, as I thought it was down to $1476 already as of last Friday evening?
Gold - Electronic (COMEX) Jun 2013
$1,480.50
Change -20.90 -1.39%
Volume 30,901
Apr 14, 2013, 9:24 p.m.
Previous close $ 1,501.40
Day low $1,477
Day high $1,495
Open: 1,481.00
52 week low $1,476
52 week high $1,803
Spring Market Observation from suburban Boston. For sale inventory seems the same as past years. Low end (condos and houses under $400K not moving. Past few weeks lots of stuff on the market in the $750K - $500 range. And it seems to be selling quickly. But the newer listings of $750K look like what have been $450K - $500K houses. Honesty don’t know what they’re thinking. Lot’s of stuff $800K+ sitting. Many of the same houses have been for sale for the 3 years that I have lived here. This is western suburbs - Winchester, Arlington, Lincoln, Concord, Lexington, Waltham, etc… The housing stock is not great here in the sense that there have been very little added in the past 30 or 40 years. Maybe if you go way far out. Lots of the stuff is junk. Surprises the junk people buy bubble or no bubble. You can rent very nice apartments for reasonable amounts.
A mold-infested house in our vicinity went on the market just over a month ago at $550K, versus the Zestimate™ of $465K, which I am guessing fails to reflect the anecdotal reports on the mold situation which passed through the neighborhood grapevine. It is a comp to the place we rent, for which our LLs paid $565K near the bubble peak in 2004. Since listing it, they dropped the price to around $540K a couple of weeks ago, then again to under $520K just last week.
Apparently, despite the red hot market here in San Diego, all these price discounts have failed to spark a bid war on this property.
Flash forward to yesterday: The listing history says the home was delisted, then listed again on the same day at the same price (still just a little below $520K, and way north of the Zestimate™). Why bother delisting only to list again at the same price?
Would the Realtors™ possibly assume there are buyers out there who are too dumb to figure out that in a Dutch auction sale, one can most likely get a more attractive price by simply waiting until the sellers drop it again?
Folks, for those that are filing today and tomorrow, isn’t it grand to finally get the taxes done. Thank God the higher taxes for the rich didn’t affect me.
BTW, I hate comments like that…they takes nothing else into consideration: Investment of capital into business, investment of time and $ into education, current investment of time into work, willingness to take risk, investment of years working NOT making as much prior to making it to peak earning years, etc.
Clearly it’s better to have a good lifestyle as compared to sleeping in a box.
However, what’s better? A government desk job making $75k per year? Or working as an attorney making $120k per year?
Consider pension (or lack thereof), cost of education, current vacation days, hours worked per week, etc.
The answer is not always clear based on income alone.
P.S. If you don’t mind waiting in line, you can get free food at Carmel Mountain Chick-fil-A tomorrow to assuage the pain of paying taxes. Unless you are too broke after paying your taxes to afford the cash outlay…
I’m going to check out how long the line is just before dinner time…and bring along reading material as a hedge (the time is not wasted if you are doing something you would have to do anyway…).
After paying our taxes this year, I am in somewhat of a penny-pinching mood…
Taxation eve. Tomorrow for me will be the real “poof” as I allowed access to a bank account to pay the taxes. Poof goes one half of my cash savings.
My California colleagues tell me what Whac says. Be happy you are in a high tax bracket. It means you are able to have a high standard of living. Well maybe yes. In England in the 60s the maximum tax rate was 95%, which prompted The Beatles to write “Taxman.” “One for you nineteen for me…”
Need to go on extension…don’t have all the K-1s yet. With final payment for 2012, and first estimate for 2013…big ouch. I told my wife the final tally for 2012, and she is now officially a Republican. I’ll leave out the more colorful language related to people who say we aren’t paying our “fair share”.
California imposed a new law on banks innocuously called “Homeowners Bill of Rights” which forces banks to switch over to a judicial foreclosure process, which they can opt to do on their own, but takes a year or more to renegotiate contracts and compensation structures for the foreclosure law firms who do all the leg work for the banks. And while those changes are being made… it makes it appear that foreclosures have slowed down dramatically in the state.
The reality?
Defaults (undeclared) are spiraling upward that yet have to pass through the foreclosure pipeline.
The truth?
California is still the highest foreclosure state in sheer volume and percentage.
The low-down?
Resale housing in California is still massively overpriced as a result of unprecedented interference by individual states and the federal government. The market distortions will be removed and the down draft will continue allowing the market to correct.
With millions of excess empty houses and housing demand at 17 year lows, housing prices have a long way to fall. A very long way to fall.
If you’re paying more than $55-60 per square foot for a resale house, you’re paying far too much.
ALWAYS perform a per square foot estimate of the value of a house and NEVER entrust anyone else to do it for you. The Real Estate Machine will do and say anything to keep you from performing this analysis.
Suppose you had four choices of how to allocate your savings:
1) Put all your money into gold.
2) Put all your money into Bitcoin.
3) Put all your money into a dollar-denominated passbook savings account.
4) Put all your money into U.S. residential real estate investments.
Which is most likely to prove to be a money-losing strategy through the lens of the rear-view mirror?
I agree though. Strategy 4 is a fools game. We still have a cultural war. In the 1960s my family would leave the house unlocked. Many others too, in a town near Yosemite Park. Neighborhoods kept their characters until Nixon’s Section 8. CRA made irresponsible people get into SFH neighborhoods.
70% of neighborhoods in the USA are now ghettos. Why not burn your money instead of own RE? At least you will be mobile.
The Billboards will soon go up: SECTION OCHO, SI! brought to you by Blackrock.
I think this is the explanation for a lot of the institutional investors. They know that they can’t do worse than a Section 8 payment for rental income and theres getting resdy to be between 10 and 20 million who will now qualify. How much do you need to pay for the house to make the $1200 a month Section 8 payment cash flow you positive?
This is rich. The warmonger, racist, pro-drone murder poster, pro-government anything, invoking 60’s issues. Maybe you remember the guys in Easy Rider were making a few bucks smuggling cocaine. What has our wonderful government war on drugs given us? We have gangs in Mexico cutting peoples heads off on youtube. There are something like 60-100,000 dead in Mexico in the last few years, as the US paid Mexico to go militant. And Obama, your hero, supported a coup against the leader of Honduras and now we are running death squads down there. Sounds real free MAN!
What a joke; a fascist, war loving, brutal state solution to everything poster quoting Easy Rider. The Brotherhood of Man indeed.
‘What could be more destructive to the cherished freedoms that make America a “shining city on a hill” than giving a “high level official” the power to kill Americans on US soil without any due process, accountability or transparency? What could be more Orwellian than asserting such dictatorial authority, which has always been the hallmark of totalitarian states, in the name of protecting the public’s safety? The cost of war is not measured solely in terms of blood and treasure. War also corrodes human morality to a point where even the most inhumane acts become perfectly acceptable. In fact, summary executions without due process and the right to a fair trial served as one of the justifications for removing Saddam Hussein’s regime.’
‘Not only does the recent Department of Justice White Paper resoundingly affirm this power grab, it also destroys the foundation of Anglo-American jurisprudence by nullifying the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ It eviscerates the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits any deprivation of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” It obliterates the protections afforded by the Sixth Amendment, including the “right to a speedy and public trial,” by asserting that government allegations alone, based on secret evidence, are sufficient to establish guilt. Accusation is guilt, Winston. As Glenn Greenwald cogently observes:’
“But of course, when this memo refers to “a Senior Operational Leader of al-Qaida”, what it actually means is this: someone whom the President – in total secrecy and with no due process – has accused of being that. Indeed, the memo itself makes this clear, as it baldly states that presidential assassinations are justified when “an informed, high-level official of the US government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the US.’
‘This is the crucial point: the memo isn’t justifying the due-process-free execution of senior al-Qaida leaders who pose an imminent threat to the US. It is justifying the due-process-free execution of people secretly accused by the president and his underlings, with no due process, of being that.”
‘Rarely do apologists for the normalization of extra-judicial murder realize that this represents a permanent erosion of core liberties, an ever-lasting debasement of the Bill of Rights. “We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it,” Orwell said. “Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.”
‘Orwell explained doublethink as “holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them…To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed…”
I still say they’re not going to make the parish line.
Comment by RobertoRibas
2013-04-14 18:59:39
:kisses:
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-04-14 19:11:02
To me a key message of Easy Rider was what the state’s rights boys ( the rednecks at the coffee shop, shocked to see an American flag on his bike) did to Capt America.
That’s why I’m leery of state’s rights. That scene rang true. Still does today.
You win the prize. (I thought about including a diversification choice on my list of alternatives, but then I wondered if somebody would suggest it if I omitted it…)
If you had to choose one as a long-term store of value, it would have to be gold, as the others will naturally steadily erode in value through time.
That said, there is a risk that gold is overpriced today, reflecting its superiority as a long-term store of value, and may not recover to recent price levels for decades to come…
True: if you buy “today” which means tomorrow when most coin shops are open. But if you buy the same $ amount periodically why worry about what you paid for on a certain day? I have a few ounces I bought at $1780 spot. I have a few ounces I bought at $450 spot per ounce.
I agree with you unless gold has perchance entered a long-term slide, similar to between 1980-2000 or like the Japanese stock and real estate markets from 1990-2013, in which cases I disagree…
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 15:41:44
Of course, the problem is that you can only know when you are viewing a collapsed bubble through the lens of the rear-view mirror.
After taking a beating during the Great Recession, the housing market is finally staggering back to its feet—but millions of Americans are wondering: Is it safe to get back in the real estate game?
“It made so much sense at the time,” says Maura C. of the Chicago condo she and her husband purchased in 2009.
The 30-something couple—motivated in part by the $8,000 federal tax credit for first-time homeowners—decided to buy the $310,000 two-bedroom unit shortly after their wedding.
“I’d been a renter for more than a decade,” Maura says, “but I never doubted that I would eventually own. In my mind, it was an integral part of building a future for myself and my family.”
Fast-forward four years and their apartment is underwater. A neighboring unit went through a short sale last summer, going for just $220,000, and another condo in the building is on the market for $243,000.
Now pregnant with her second child, Maura wants to eat the loss and buy a larger home. “Prices are starting to come back up, and interest rates are so low. If we wait to get above water, we’ll miss our chance,” she says.
But first, Maura has to convince her husband, Paul. “He feels trapped by the whole situation,” she says. “For him, renting would mean regaining our freedom and flexibility. But I grew up dreaming of having a ‘forever home.’ I just can’t let go of that idea.”
Maura and Paul are not alone. As statistics hint at a budding housing recovery, millions are struggling with the same questions. Is it time to get back in the game? Can we trust the market again? And perhaps the most difficult question of all: Is owning a home still the right dream?
…
If she keeps working toward her dreams, her home will be a forever slum, with cRAP music blaring next door, stabbings down the street, crack moms across the street, domestic violence and sexual predators all over. Welcome to post section 8. Housing, the new depreciating asset for most American nabes. Ghetto, our new culture.
I not going to do the research but you can bet she’s lying about “it made so much sense at the time.” This is coming from someone who says “…But I grew up dreaming of having a ‘forever home.’ I just can’t let go of that idea.”
What it means is the nesting instinct got the better of good judgment and now wants to yield to it again. Poor Paul. But then he married her and decided to put up with her nonsense.
But first, Maura has to convince her husband, Paul. “He feels trapped by the whole situation,” she says. “For him, renting would mean regaining our freedom and flexibility. But I grew up dreaming of having a ‘forever home.’ I just can’t let go of that idea.”
The part of the story which left me confused was the wife’s musings about whether it is time to just “eat the loss” of $90,000 and move into a bigger place. Is it that hard to tell when you got stucco?
After having read through most of this real estate fluffer piece, I have a burning question: How much does the NAR pay MSM outlets to publish their tripe?
What could possibly go wrong with pumping $40 bn a month into mortgage backed securities purchase, then loaning out the proceed to help needy people buy homes?
U.S. homebuyers are getting an unexpected boost from the Bank of Japan.
As Governor Haruhiko Kuroda’s efforts to spark inflation by doubling the central bank’s bond purchases shrinks the available debt in his country, traders are betting that will bolster demand for U.S-owned Ginnie Mae’s mortgage securities, pushing up prices and lowering yields that guide home-loan rates.
Japanese investors venturing into the U.S. home-loan market typically favor debt from Ginnie Mae, which helps finance borrowers with down payments as low as 3.5 percent, because it carries an explicit government guarantee, unlike Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac notes. Bond buyers from the Asian nation that has suffered three recessions in five years may increase their Ginnie Mae holdings by $50 billion annually as a result of the BoJ’s easing, Nomura Securities International estimates.
“It’s amazing to see the spillover effects of different central bank actions,” said Greg Reiter, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based head of residential mortgage research at the securities arm of Wells Fargo & Co., the largest U.S. home lender. “It could be quite stimulative to the U.S. economy by keeping mortgage rates low and assisting the Fed.”
Potential demand for Ginnie Mae securities from Japanese investors such as banks and insurers comes at an opportune time. The rebounding U.S. housing market has entered its most-active season and Federal Reserve officials signal they’re considering scaling back their own debt buying, which adds $40 billion of U.S. mortgage bonds a month to the Fed’s holdings.
…
Post Special Report Wall Street buys up Main Street
New kid on the block:corporate titans
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Palm Beach County real estate investor Chip Bryan added 35 homes to his expanding cache in the first 60 days of the year. Backed by a private equity fund, he’s in buy, hold and rent mode. And he’s in a hurry.
Bryan’s competition is America’s financial masterminds, corporate behemoths who have set their sights on Florida as Wall Street buys up Main Street.
Another twist in the nation’s evolving housing market has hedge funds and multi-billion dollar companies becoming the landlords of the future, snapping up discounted single-family homes to rent out as they’ve done in the past with commercial properties and multi-family apartments.
It’s been just a year since a spontaneous comment by billionaire Warren Buffett ignited the corporate world’s home-buying spree. But already the New York-based Blackstone Group has 20,000 homes nationwide, including 4,000 in Florida.
Canada’s Tricon Capital, working with Lake Success Rentals, claims a bounty of 1,500 homes in South Florida and North Carolina. Colony Capital, based in Santa Monica, Calif., just announced its intention to buy 1,000 South Florida homes with a $2 billion nationwide investment.
One of the more aggressive buyers in South Florida is the Connecticut-based Starwood Property Trust. Despite having “no news to share” when contacted by The Palm Beach Post for this story, the company has picked up more than 80 Palm Beach County homes at foreclosure auction since it began buying in late November.
“This business used to be a subculture of deal makers and opportunists, mostly Realtors and contractors,” said Bryan, managing partner of Boca Raton-based Rebound Residential. “Then Wall Street arrived.”
Don’t be late on rent
The rapid-fire acquisitions are driven by a murky shelf life. Climbing home prices eat into profit, meaning a tipping point will arrive when the buy-hold-rent business model no longer makes sense. And unlike the mom and pop landlords of lore who may let a rent check slip in late now and then, corporations are all about the bottom line.
During a Starwood Property earnings conference call in February, one executive likened buying homes to trawling for tuna. You catch a lot of fish, keep the tuna, and throw everything else back in the ocean.
In late February 2012, Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Buffett sat in a director’s chair on CNBC’s Squawk Box and said if he had a way of managing them, he would buy “a couple hundred thousand single family homes.”
$37 million in this county
By April, the Blackstone Group was in the single-family landlord business, investing $3.8 billion nationwide. Blackstone created the new housing firm Invitation Homes to market and manage the rentals, buying heavily on Florida’s west coast with at least 700 homes in Hillsborough County, according to property appraiser records. Its South Florida purchases include about 150 homes in Palm Beach County, which cost a combined $37 million, according to the property appraiser’s office. Blackstone has another 500 homes in Broward and Miami-Dade counties.
‘Sweet spot’ price
Tricon Capital Group announced its partnership with Lake Success in July 2012 as part of an aggressive push to buy more distressed real estate. The basic business plan, said Lake Success co-founder Barry Bergman, is to buy homes at a “sweet spot” of between $75,000 and $150,000, spend an average of $15,000 on repairs, and rent them out until housing prices increase enough that it makes sense to sell. Lake Success has spent about $19.6 million in Palm Beach County for 140 homes.
“If the market changes and home prices go crazy, then maybe we’ll sell them in five to 10 years,” said Bergman, whose firm buys at auction and through bulk sales of distressed homes. “But we think there is a long term paradigm shift in the affordability of people to own homes. There is a definite portion of this population who will be renters for a while and want to rent in nice communities.”
Bryan, of Rebound Residential, said his company puts between $10,000 and $25,000 into remodeling a home before renting it out.
The clean-up job at a home on Cam Lee Road in suburban West Palm Beach wasn’t even finished before potential renters started calling. The house is on a cul-de-sac with three bedrooms, two bathrooms, a big backyard and wood flooring. The company paid $80,100 for the home in February through a short sale. The previous owner bought in 2006 for $250,000.
“buy homes at a “sweet spot” of between $75,000 and $150,000″
“portion of this population who will be renters for a while and want to rent in nice communities”
It’s a brilliant plan, only requires changing between 10 and 20 million’s legal status from illegal to legal to allow the Section 8 qualification. Then it’s virtually risk free! Been wondering why the reform seems to be much more of a fait accompli this time.
And before anyone gets their panties in a bunch, I agree we need to make them legal. But we’re going to do it Obamacare style without considering the consequences.
“Post Special Report Wall Street buys up Main Street”
With hundreds of billions (or was it trillions) in low-interest loans from the Fed to Megabank, Inc during the Fall 2008 financial crisis bailout, NOBODY COULD HAVE SEEN IT COMING!!!!
“Bryan’s competition is America’s financial masterminds, corporate behemoths who have set their sights on Florida as Wall Street buys up Main Street.”
I pity any individual U.S. householder who is dumb enough to go head-to-head with Wall Street’s Masters of the Universe in competition for U.S. single-family homes as investments. You are going to loose alot of money — ALOT!
The vast majority of borrowers being compensated for mortgage-related abuses will get $1,000 or less apiece.
About four million borrowers will share $3.6 billion in cash as part of a settlement between federal regulators and banks accused of foreclosure-processing mistakes. U.S. regulators said last week that banks wrongfully took away homes from 1,082 borrowers who were members of the U.S. military. Another 53 borrowers were found to have lost their homes despite not actually defaulting on their loans. Those 1,135 individuals will receive checks of $125,000.
Most borrowers will see far less, with about 80% receiving checks ranging from $300 to $1,000, according to data released by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve.
…
During the recent financial crisis, the Federal Reserve initially employed its traditional monetary policy tools, bringing the federal funds rate target rate down to practically zero by the end of 2008. But once they reached the zero bound, they could not push the rate any lower. The Fed then turned to some less traditional types of tools, including maturity extension and the purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS), to improve economic growth and the labor market. Since most textbooks have not yet caught up with these policy instruments, we offer a “plain English primer on the art and science of the Fed’s recent policy actions, with discussion questions that you can use with your students.
What policy actions did the Fed take recently?
In September 2011, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced a $400-billion program to sell, or redeem, short-term Treasury securities and purchase longer term securities with the proceeds. The FOMC later extended this program—officially called a maturity extension program, or MEP, and unofficially known as “Operation Twist”—through the end of 2012.
In September 2012, the Fed increased its accommodative monetary policy stance by increasing its purchases of agency MBS by $40 billion per month while continuing to reinvest the principal payments from existing securities and agency debt holdings into agency MBS. (Agency securities are guaranteed by government-sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.) The FOMC renewed these programs in December, directing the Trading Desk at the New York Fed to purchase $45 billion in longer-term Treasury securities per month and to extend the $40 billion monthly purchase of agency MBS and reinvestment of principal payments. They also announced that in January, the Fed’s maturing Treasury securities would be rolled over into new issue at auction and that it would continue its accommodation until the economic recovery is on solid footing and economic conditions warrant a change in direction.
…
The attorney for the man accused of murdering Trayvon Martin wants details about a wrongful-death settlement — which could have paid $1 million or more — given to the late teen’s parents.
Mark Zandi, a prominent economist, has emerged as a leading candidate to head the regulator of mortgage-finance companies Fannie Mae (FNMA -2.80%) and Freddie Mac (FMCC -4.13%) amid signs that he would likely attract support from Senate Republicans, according to people familiar with the matter.
The White House hasn’t yet decided who to nominate as the next director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, a position it has struggled to fill. Along with Mr. Zandi, the Obama administration has also been considering Rep. Mel Watt, a North Carolina Democrat.
…
The FHFA’s current director, Edward DeMarco, took the job four years ago in an acting capacity after his predecessor left for the private sector. Mr. DeMarco has at times clashed with the Obama administration over homeowner aid, and left-leaning groups have campaigned to replace him. The agency, created five years ago, has never had its own director confirmed by the Senate because of Republican opposition to an earlier nomination.
Mr. Zandi has attracted attention, in part, because he may have a good chance at winning Senate confirmation. Senate Republicans have largely supported Mr. DeMarco and are expected to scrutinize his successor closely. But Mr. Zandi may placate these critics.
Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.), who serves on the Senate Banking Committee, said in a written statement Friday: “If Mark Zandi and the administration have an acceptable plan to transition us away from our dependence on [Fannie and Freddie], I’m optimistic that he could do a good job helping our country effectively execute that plan while also protecting the taxpayer.”
On housing, Mr. Zandi has published a paper outlining the need for a continued government role in backstopping the home-loan market.
While he has sometimes advocated more government intervention to address the foreclosure crisis, he has also called for scaling back the mortgage-interest deduction and the government’s role in the mortgage market once the current crisis has abated.
Replacing Mr. DeMarco could give the administration greater latitude to expand initiatives to help homeowners facing foreclosure and to mediate disputes over when banks should be forced to “buy back” defaulted mortgages, which some policy makers fret has kept credit standards too tight. But people familiar with the process have said that the Obama administration’s push to fill the FHFA position has less to do with specific policy flare-ups and more to do with its desire to have a permanent director oversee the process of overhauling Fannie and Freddie.
Without clear direction from the White House or Congress, Mr. DeMarco has begun to move more aggressively to shrink the firms’ heavy presence in the mortgage market. Last month, he announced plans to merge some of the firms’ back-office operations into a separate company that, for now, would be jointly owned by Fannie and Freddie.
…
“Mr. DeMarco has at times clashed with the Obama administration over homeowner aid,”
If you put Gatorade and homeowner aid together you would get…….
Shop online for Sports Nutrition, Homeownerade items, health and wellness … It starts with Homeownerade Prime 01, which provides pre-workout or pre-foreclosure fuel …. Adding too much or too little water to the mix will adversely affect Homeownerade effectiveness. …. the Obama administration suggested to Mr. DeMarco that he use Homeownerade to …
If it mentioned anywhere in that article that the principle reductions that Democrats want the FHFA to approve would, in many cases, amount to handouts valued at north of $100K for many underwater borrowers and much more for many underwater borrowers in California, then I must have missed it.
I also never saw an MSM article which estimated the value of underwater refis offered through the GSEs, which I am quite sure are also worth six figures in many instances. None of these hard data on wealth transfers to homeowners ever cloud the happy talk about how much help homeowners are getting these days.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-04-14 20:58:55
I’m certain Mark Zandi will give a full accounting of such costs of GSE programs to the taxpayers, when and if he becomes head of FHFA…
“It does not require a majority to prevail,
but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.”
–Samuel Adams - Leader in our Fight for Independence
WILDLANDS PROJECT: Incredible, Outrageous and a Very Real Danger
Most Americans are completely unaware of the true nature of the threat from radical environmentalists. Although many of our countrymen are in a deep coma while others are pre-occupied with satisfying their appetites, we cling to the hope that there are enough good-intentioned but misinformed Americans who would join us in rescuing our way of life if they knew the truth. If you have any doubt that the green Fascists are undemocratic, elitist, socialist anti-Americans who despise humanity while worshipping “Mother Earth”, the rocks, the shrubs, the rodents and the grubs, we invite you to learn the truth from their own mouths, publications and websites.
The mission statement of the Wildlands Project states that “…we live for the day when Grizzlies in Chihuahua have an unbroken connection to Grizzlies in Alaska; when Gray Wolf populations are continuous from New Mexico to Greenland; when vast unbroken forests and flowing plains again thrive and support pre-Columbian populations of plants and animals;…” This sounds warm and fuzzy but what would it mean for the humans in the area?
Davis says about the Wildlands Project publication, “Wild Earth exists in part to remind conservationists that in the long run all lands and waters should be left to the whims of Nature.” Davis says that serious conservationists cannot accept development for human needs which he calls “sacrifice zones”. Davis prophesies the complete and final demise of human civilization when he states that, “the premise that we ought to save the full range of biodiversity leads logically to the conclusion that humanizing of landscapes must stop now and be reversed.” By “full range” Davis means the natural bios as it existed in Pre-Columbian America. This is the premise that most environmental groups are committed to.
Davis concludes his harangue with this revealing statement: “Does all the foregoing mean that Wild Earth and The Wildlands Project advocate the end of industrial civilization? Most assuredly. Everything civilized must go.”
Davis unwittingly reveals the dirty secret about the public face these groups put on to elicit public support for their radical view of the future. “..no one need advocate dismantling industrial civilization in order to join with The Wildlands Project. One need only favor the perpetuation of the full range of biodiversity and natural processes. (If you like bears, eagles, scurfpeas, and pearly mussels, join.)”, he says. Join even though you don’t support the outcome we have planned for you. Join and add your voice to ours and let us worry about the future. Join because you have warm, fuzzy feelings about wild creatures and leave the driving to us.
Dr. Reed Noss who is associated with the Wildlands Project as well as the University of Oregon and other radical environmental groups describes the corridor that would be needed to assure viability of the grizzly bear in Montana. “If the population of grizzlies in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem is to be connected to other populations, which seems to be necessary to assure population viability, then wide corridors with resident grizzlies must connect Yellowstone with the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (about 200 miles away) and the wildlands of central Idaho. …corridor for grizzly bears should be at least 44.25 km (27.5 miles) wide.” In further describing the corridor, he states, “Because Road densities above about 0.5 miles of road per square mile of habitat may be a threat to grizzlies (Bader 1991), road closures would be required to make inter-regional corridors safe .”
The proposed corridor would have to run somewhere between the southern end of the Scapegoat Wilderness north of Lincoln, Mt to Yellowstone Park south of Bozeman. It would cross hundreds of roads not to mention pipelines and large regional power lines and thousands of acres of private land. If these people have there way, do you think they would allow I-90 to run slam through the middle of their grizzly bear corridor? Of course not. It would either be closed and torn up for the width of the corridor plus a buffer zone on each side as would most of the rest of the roads in the area or it would tunnel under the entire width of the corridor. East- west travel would be restricted to one or two narrow, dangerous slow speed roads with no services. This would be the best we could hope for since even high altitude overflight of these areas is considered harmful.
What the radical environmentalists of the Wildlands Project want are ” Vast landscapes without roads, dams, motorized vehicles, powerlines, overflights, or other artifacts of civilization..” Noss, who is generally more restrained than Davis states the goal thus: “I suggest that at least half of the land area of the 48 conterminous states should be encompassed in core reserves and inner corridor zones (essentially extensions of core reserves) within the next few decades.” Core reserves equals wilderness.
Typical environmentalist that he is, Noss is not satisfied with half as we find out further on in this article. “I would offer a more ambitious long-term goal, pending human population reduction, that at least 95 percent of a region be managed as wilderness and surrounding multiple-use wildlands.” Of course Noss envisions himself and his colleagues roaming the 95% in some scientific/management capacity. They would set themselves up as kings of the forest with all the wealth and authority of the federal government at their command. The rest of us will be forcibly confined in the remaining 5%. Thankfully, there will be fewer of us to share that urban desert of poverty, crime and hopelessness. The loggers have already been told by government officials and radical environmentalists alike that they must adapt to the new social realities. Sooner or later we all follow that road if these people win this battle.
Don’t think that Dr. Noss is some lightweight, hemp smoking, tree hugger whose opinion can be easily dismissed. He has a Ph.D. in Wildlife Ecology, a long list of awards and professional appointments to boards and committees. He has written hundreds of articles and books. Noss has worked as a naturalist/conservation biologist for 28 years for various universities, federal and state agencies, including the EPA, and environmental groups. These credentials don’t make him right - just respected. We don’t dare turn over control of our lives to educated fools no matter how many degrees they may have.
But that is exactly what we will do if we let Noss and his colleagues set the agenda for this century.
You notice they never want to bring back the pristine ecosystem of the NYC or SF areas. For Wyoming people wolf reintroduction has sucked just like they knew it would. These folks don’t care. So be it. I just get annoyed when the next tactic is to make fun of the way people vote when there are perfectly rational reasons for it, such as this.
It’s a small house in Detroit, but it carries a big warning.
“This house is being watched. You will get shot.”
But it’s not clear who is watching the house on West Davison and Petoskey. Every window and door is boarded up. Each board carries a similar message – squatters beware. And on the garage, a giant set of red cat-like eyes stares between the words, “Don’t let me catch you. I will shoot you.”
“I think it’s kind of weird,” said Nakesha Horton, 18, who was walking down West Davison Sunday night after her shift at Burger King.
She said she’s seen the house a couple of times, and wonders if the warnings will keep people out. Houses around it are in bad shape. Some are vacant, many are burned and others appear to be slowly falling apart. This is a neighborhood far from the hustle, bustle and promise of Detroit’s core neighborhoods.
“You can’t just walk down the street, People don’t even go in that park,” said Clay Vuron, 41, a resident of the neighborhood, walking near a playground across the street from the red-eye house.
County records show the home on West Davison went into forfeiture one month ago for non-payment of taxes. A few years ago, it carried a $75,000 mortgage. It’s not clear when the signage went up and publicly available phone numbers associated with the former owner, who apparently lives in Southfield, are disconnected.
“It’s a waste of time,” said Vuron, who said he is moving north of 8 Mile with his grandmother at the end of the month. “People are already in there. They need to just tear it down.”
That’s the trouble with Chinese food. A few hours later, you’re hungry again.
Police: 6-year-old Lapeer boy caught driving family car was headed to chinese restaurant
Detroit Free Press
A six-year-old Lapeer boy driving his family’s car made it about three miles before he was stopped by residents Saturday morning.
“I opened the door and asked him what he was doing,” Lapeer County Sheriff deputy Karl Sapp recalled. “He told me he was going to the dealer to get the car fixed.”
The boy, who had hit a street sign near his house and cracked the bumper, initially blamed the damage to the car on his father, he said.
His parents were home sleeping around 7:30 a.m. and didn’t know the child was gone with the family’s Ford Taurus station wagon, authorities said.
The boy was initially heading to the Chinese restaurant where he ate the night before.
Retail sales in the U.S. dropped in March by the most in nine months, pointing to a slowdown in consumer spending as the first quarter drew to a close.
Purchases fell 0.4 percent, the biggest setback since June, after jumping 1 percent in February, according to Commerce Department figures issued today in Washington. Consumer sentiment took a hit this month after employment cooled, a report from Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan also showed.
The sales data prompted economists to trim consumer- spending forecasts from what was projected to be the best quarter in two years. Gains in hiring and wages will be needed to ensure any slowdown proves temporary as federal budget cuts and an increase in the payroll tax restrain the expansion.
“It’s not as if things are falling apart, they’re just softening relative to a strong start to the quarter,” said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York. “The first quarter still looks better than had been expected a few months ago, particularly in the face of the headwinds.”
…
Asian stocks dropped, with the regional benchmark index retreating from the highest level in 20 months, after Chinese economic growth and industrial production expanded less than economists’ estimated.
Jiangxi Copper Co., China’s largest copper producer, plunged 5 percent in Hong Kong. Newcrest Mining Ltd., Australia’s biggest gold producer, sank 8.7 percent, after the bullion tumbled to the lowest price in almost two years. Nissan Motor Co. (7201), a Japanese carmaker that gets 32 percent of sales from North America, slid 3.3 percent, pacing declines among exporters after U.S. retail sales unexpectedly fell.
The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell 1 percent to 136.81 as of 12:50 p.m. in Tokyo, with about four shares falling for each that rose. Chinese gross domestic product expanded 7.7 percent in the first quarter, missing economists estimates, data released today showed.
“While the medium-term outlook is OK, people are having to digest the fact that some of this short-term news flow isn’t quite as good,” Angus Gluskie, managing director at Sydney- based White Funds Management, which oversees more than $350 million, said before the release of the Chinese data. “There’s no doubt China’s growth over the next five or six years is going to be at a more mature pace than it was over the last decade. We should be expecting lesser rates of growth.”
…
LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) — Oil futures slid nearly 3% in electronic trade Monday, with weaker-than-anticipated economic reports from China adding to festering worries about slowing growth in global demand for the commodity.
May crude oil (CLK3 -2.62%) fell $2.47, or 2.7%, to $88.83 a barrel in Asian trading after China posted quarterly-growth and monthly industrial-production figures that fell short of expectations.
China said gross domestic product rose 7.7% in the January-March quarter, slower than growth of 7.9% in the fourth quarter, and below expectations for an 8% gain in separate surveys from Dow Jones Newswires and Reuters.
…
It’s no longer Cyprus’s fault that gold is slumping. Rather the culprit du juor is China.
It couldn’t simply be that gold and other hard commodities were irrationally overvalued at the height of an epic global financial panic, and everyone is finally waking up to the fact, could it?
Gold sinks another $56 on China GDP disappointment
Precious metal has nearly duplicated Friday’s session that pushed it into bear-market territory after China growth data fell short of expectations. • Oil tumbles below $89 as China data deepen worries
April 15, 2013, 1:27 a.m. EDT
Gold falls sharply; copper hit after China data
By Carla Mozee, MarketWatch
LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) — Gold futures fell in electronic trade Monday, deepening their descent after entering bear-market territory last week, and prices for industrial metal copper suffered following economic data from China that fell short of expectations.
Gold for June delivery tumbled $61.70, or 4.1%, to $1,440.10 an ounce during Asian trading hours. Gold last week lost 4.7%.
The losses roughly matched gold’s heavy drop on Friday, when it lost $63.50, or 4.1%, to $1,501.40 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. Friday’s settlement price marked a 20.5% drop for the most-active contract from the record high settlement of $1,888.70 an ounce reached on Aug. 22, 2011.
Sentiment in the gold market has suffered in part from recent cuts to price forecasts for the precious metal and outflows from gold exchange-traded products.
Copper prices (HGK3 -1.64%), meanwhile, lost 6 cents, or 1.8%, to $3.29 a pound. Copper’s gain of 0.2% last week was wiped out after China, the world’s second-largest economy, posted quarterly-growth and monthly industrial-production figures that missed analyst expectations.
China’s gross domestic product in the January-March quarter rose 7.7%, slower than growth of 7.9% in the fourth quarter, and below expectations for an 8% gain in separate surveys from Dow Jones Newswires and Reuters.
…
Hedge funds and other speculators added to bullish gold bets as the metal slumped into a bear market and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. warned the retreat is accelerating after the longest rally in nine decades.
The investors increased net-long positions by 19 percent to 56,084 futures and options in the week ended April 9, the first gain in three weeks, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data show. That contrasts with a 7.9 percent decline in bullish wagers across 18 U.S.-traded raw materials, which fell to a five-week low of 431,581 contracts. Holdings in agriculture dropped to the lowest since September 2006.
The turn in the gold cycle is quickening and investors should sell the metal, Goldman Sachs said in an April 10 recommendation that returned 5.4 percent in three days. Gold retreated as the Standard & Poor’s GSCI Index of 24 raw materials fell to a nine-month low, extending a slump that Citigroup Inc. said marks the “death bell” for the supercycle, or longer-than-average period of rising prices. Global equities advanced to the highest since June 2008 as U.S. stocks reached a record.
“Anybody who did some buying before this big drop is probably in some pain,” said Donald Selkin, who helps manage about $3 billion of assets as chief market strategist at National Securities Corp. in New York. “The perception is that gold is not really needed as a safe haven. People are looking at the stock market and they’re stunned, and there’s no inflation. So people are saying ‘What do we need gold for?’”
…
Metals and energy sank, sending a gauge of commodities to an eight-month low and extending a slump that Citigroup Inc. said may mark the “death bell” for the four-year rally in materials. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SXXP) fell from a record as retail sales and consumer confidence slid.
The S&P/GSCI Index tumbled 1.3 percent to the lowest level since July. Gold futures plunged as much as 5.3 percent to trade below $1,500 for the first time since 2011 and entered a bear market, amid speculation Cyprus will sell reserves to raise cash. The S&P 500 Index slipped 0.3 percent, while emerging market technology stocks fell the most since August after Infosys Ltd.’s sales forecast missed estimates. The 10-year Treasury note yield lost seven basis points to 1.72 percent, while the dollar strengthened versus 10 of 16 major peers.
U.S. retail sales fell in March by the most in nine months, Commerce Department figures showed, and the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan preliminary index of consumer sentiment sank to the lowest level since July. European stocks and the euro fell earlier as the currency bloc’s finance ministers prepared to meet. Citigroup analysts said there will be “many more losers than winners” for commodities this quarter and most industrial and precious metals will decline.
“It’s partly driven by a number of investors who have come to the conclusion that it’s not attractive to be in commodities, especially with what’s going on in the stock market,” said Jesper Dannesboe, senior commodity strategist at Societe Generale SA in London. “When people see gold going down, that might have reinforced selling in other commodities. We think it’s overdone in base metals, in oil, because the global economy is recovering. In gold, this is the beginning of the bear market.”
…
I can’t help but wonder whether many of the shops which sprang up all over creation the past several years under signs that say “We Buy Gold” are soon to shutter their operations?
Or would a panic in gold actually result in an increase in sales, due to investors dumping their holdings of physical? I guess time will tell…
Gold’s Rout Deepens as Investors Reduce Holdings on Recovery
By Glenys Sim & Phoebe Sedgman - Apr 14, 2013 8:17 PM PT
Gold, which plunged into a bear market last week, extended a rout to the lowest level since April 2011 on expectations that demand for haven assets will contract as the global economy improves. Silver slumped.
Gold for immediate delivery dropped as much as 3.9 percent $1,425.75 an ounce and was at $1,444.07 at 11:14 a.m. in Singapore. Prices tumbled 5 percent on April 12, taking losses to more than 20 percent since the record close in September 2011, and meeting the common definition of a bear market.
Bullion has dropped 14 percent in 2013, after a run of 12 annual gains, as data showed that the U.S. recovery was gaining traction, prompting increased speculation that the central bank will rein in its unprecedented stimulus program. Holdings in exchange-traded products contracted at a record pace in the first quarter, and have fallen for the past nine weeks. The turn in the gold cycle is quickening and investors should sell the metal, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said in an April 10 note.
“The demise of gold is still at an early stage,” Georgette Boele, a commodities strategist at ABN Amro Group NV, wrote in a note today. “Other assets will become increasingly more attractive as the growth outlook improves.”
…
With so many other asset markets around the globe under severe price pressure, the resilience U.S. housing prices is a wonder to behold. Buy a U.S. investment house now, or even ten, as they aren’t making any more land here in the U.S.!
The Bank of Japan (8301)’s “huge bet” by boosting quantitative easing won’t turn the economy around and is instead sending the nation toward default, said Takeshi Fujimaki, former adviser to billionaire investor George Soros.
The BOJ said April 4 it will double monthly debt purchases to 7.5 trillion yen ($76 billion). That’s about 70 percent of planned bond issuance from the world’s most heavily indebted government. Governor Haruhiko Kuroda set a two-year horizon for achieving the 2 percent annual inflation target adopted in January at Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s urging and said the monetary base will grow to 270 trillion yen by the end of 2014.
“By expanding the monetary base to 270 trillion yen, the BOJ is making a huge bet which I think it will ultimately lose,” Fujimaki said in an interview in Tokyo on April 11. “Kuroda’s QE announcement is declaring double suicide with the government. The BOJ will have to share the country’s fate and default together.”
The BOJ governor said last week he won’t set a time limit for easing and he had taken all necessary measures for now to achieve the inflation target. Kuroda’s actions drove the yen to a four-year low of 99.95 yen and spurred volatility in government bond markets. The yield on the 10-year note climbed to 0.64 percent today after dropping as much as 14 basis points on April 5 to a record-low 0.315 percent.
Bond Volatility
“The volatility in the JGB market as well as the fact that there is large selling represent fear among investors,” the president of Fujimaki Japan, an investment advising company in Tokyo, said. “They are early signs of a larger selloff and we should continue to monitor the moves in the long-term bonds.”
…
The U.S. Treasury Department said it will press Japan to refrain from competitive devaluation while stopping short of accusing it of manipulating the yen in a report on exchange rates.
The Treasury will pressure Japan to adhere to international commitments “to remain oriented towards meeting respective domestic objectives using domestic instruments and to refrain from competitive devaluation and targeting its exchange rate for competitive purposes,” the department said in its semi-annual currency report to Congress released in Washington yesterday. The report also declined to name China a currency manipulator.
“This is a shot across the BOJ’s bow,” Kit Juckes, a global strategist at Societe Generale SA in London, said in an e-mail. “Everyone still supports Japan’s fight against deflation, but the U.S. would much rather the yen did not weaken significantly further.”
…
Wu Liangui left Shanghai’s Xiao Shaoxing restaurant with a delicacy his daughter wants him to avoid. Inside a plastic box were slices of white-cut chicken, traditionally served rare so that blood seeps from the bones.
“My daughter says I am committing suicide,” the gray- haired 65-year-old said. “But I really enjoy a dinner of chicken and rice wine and I won’t be giving it up easily.”
Wu was one of a few customers still buying Xiao Shaoxing’s specialty after the H7N9 strain of bird flu killed 13 people in China, including nine in Shanghai. Sales of white-cut chicken at the seven-decade old eatery have dropped to about 100 servings a day from as many as 600 before the outbreak, according to deputy General Manager Chen Zhiqiang, who said that in his 30 years at the restaurant he’s never seen demand fall as much.
“I fully understand,” Chen said. “I wouldn’t dare eat chicken either if I didn’t work here.”
…
How does bird flu spread so fast?
Combine densely packed populations, severe air pollution with resultant damage to lung epithelial surfaces, farmers living in close company with their animals & people traveling as never before - with the basic pathogenicity of influenza and its ability to mutate and you can have some real problems in a hurry.
Currencies designed to fix perceived flaws in Bitcoin could lead to competition that makes the idea of digital “cryptocurrency” stick.
By Tom Simonite on April 15, 2013
Why It Matters
Even if interest in Bitcoin fades, it could still have a lasting legacy as an inspiration to better-designed forms of digital money.
In recent weeks, the digital currency Bitcoin has soared and then dipped in value, along the way attracting more public attention than ever before and speculation as to whether it could become an established and widely accepted way to pay for goods and services.
But Bitcoin isn’t the only cryptocurrency out there. Several others are also surging in popularity and value, and they claim to offer technical improvements that make them better suited to mainstream use.
Some of these competing currencies already represent significant stores of value. The value of a single bitcoin on the most popular exchange was $93.70 at time of publication, and the total value of all bitcoins in circulation just over $1 billion (it was over $2 billion at the market’s high point last week). The largest alternative cryptocurrency, litecoins, were worth $2.31 each and $38 million in total; the next largest, PPCoin, were worth $0.22 each adding up to a total value of $4 million.
…
There’s a gold rush going on these days, or a Bitcoin rush, at least. Driven by the recent swings in the value of a Bitcoin, more and more people are learning about and becoming interested in the currency. While they could just buy Bitcoins at the current market rate, others are looking to try their luck at mining Bitcoins. And like prospectors who traveled west during the Gold Rush of the 19th century, many Bitcoin miners will find that they spend more on chasing the Bitcoin dream than they’ll ever hope to win back.
…
Squatters win, landlord loses –
Dave Thomas, an Akron area landlord, was surprised when he stopped by one of his rental homes
and found a bunch of complete strangers living there.
The previous tenant moved out without telling him and handed the keys to another group, which moved in without saying a word. He didn’t find out until the rent was way past due.
The newcomers didn’t fill out a rental form, so he couldn’t run a credit or background check. They didn’t put down a security deposit. They didn’t pay the first month’s rent. They didn’t sign up for utilities.
Thomas, 66, had never laid eyes on the people living in his house until he knocked on the front door. And even after that first visit, he still didn’t know their names.
So all he had to do was call police and have them thrown out, right?
Not even close.
Thanks to the state legislature, squatters have rights.
To get them out — which Thomas finally managed to do last week after two months of trying — he had to wade through the same legal process required to evict a legitimate tenant who has stopped paying the rent.
“It’s astounding, isn’t it?” says Stephanie York, city spokeswoman and assistant city law director. “Squatters have rights! It just blows my mind.
“It’s state law. I don’t understand it. I don’t know what they were thinking when they made this law.”
In 25 years as a landlord, he never had to evict anyone. He has been to court only once, when a tenant who ruined a carpet challenged his right to keep her security deposit. (He won.)
“I’ve never had problems with people,” he says. “I’m probably too easy. I just think, ‘Live and let live.’ If you rent a piece of property off me, there’s no reason for me to ever go in there unless you call and want something fixed.”
As he retraces the story of his squatters, though, he doesn’t sound the least bit mellow. The decibel level reaches about 120 and plateaus there.
“How can they live in my house — MY HOUSE! — and I don’t know them, and I got to pay their utilities?” he says, eyes shooting laser beams. “What the hell is wrong with this picture?”
Dave Thomas, an Akron area landlord, was surprised when he stopped by one of his rental homes
If he had a brain, his losses would have been lower: last months rent should have been escrowed; damage deposit equal to one months rent should have been escrowed.
A tenant moving out who wants either or both of the above back WOULD hand the keys back to the LL in order to get it.
Plus, he could/should sue for missed rent payments and damages against the previous tenant, who was the one with a legally-binding contract (lease) that they did not abide by; something on their credit-report would at least serve as a warning to future LLs.
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
I sold home in Cyprus when my husband died…and bank kept my money
EXPAT Sharon Connor was trying to move forward after the sudden death of her husband Gary when Cyprus’s economic crisis just as abruptly made her life fall apart again.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/391672/I-sold-home-in-Cyprus-when-my-husband-died-and-bank-kept-my-money
If you are no an oligarch, don’t save your money. The state will take everything you have saved. It’s better to be spendthrift with borrowed money.
And how, exactly, do you expect the state to be able to bail out oligarchs from the failure of their stupid gambles, to the tune of trillions of dollars, unless they take whatever they can get from savers?
Like death taxes are a constant. Got to figure them in your business model. I figure the non taxable retirement accounts in the US will be completely taxable and hence have planned accordingly.
Leona was foolish to go to jail for such a small amount of money. But the idea that the rich don’t pay taxes is fantasy. The top taxpayers pay a disproportionate share of taxes. Leona and her husband had paid millions and millions. But there it is never enough for the tax and spend crowd. I remember the Helmsley case well. After paying millions and millions she got fed up and cut corners. Some the reaction was something else. Reminded me of the allies’ anti German propaganda in WWI ( I am not that old
we studied it in school) You would have though Leona was roasting babies alive then eating them a la the Huns rather than fudging her bookkeeping.
Should have sold the house for Bitcoins.
Letter from Rosa Koire, Executive Dir. of Post Sustainability Institute to Democrats in the Oklahoma Legislature to Support HB 1412
February 3, 2013
To my fellow Democrats in the Oklahoma Legislature:
Concerns about UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development are spreading throughout the United States. Although you will hear that this is a right-wing position, in fact there are many Democrats across the nation who share these concerns. Loss of rights—private property and civil rights—are a concern of all Americans and are not partisan. As a registered Democrat since 1974, I have a different point of view from many others who oppose UN Agenda 21. My group, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, is active in educating the nation on what it is, where it is, who is implementing it locally, and how to fight it. As the author of Behind The Green Mask: UN Agenda 21, I have been invited to lecture all over the United States, and expect to be in Tulsa this April. Your constituents in support of HB1412 have requested that I write to you about this important vote.
UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a blueprint, the action plan to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. It is a global plan but it is implemented locally. This comprehensive plan was agreed to by G. H. W. Bush in 1992 at the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. You will hear that this is a non-binding agreement, that it is a dusty twenty year old document, or that it is a benign plan for the salvation of the planet. The truth is that it is dependent on artificial consensus, on manufactured democracy, on government by unelected boards and commissions, and on regionalization at the expense of local and state government. In fact UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a green mask. Far from being a conspiracy theory, it is a fact, and has had tremendously negative impacts in nearly every town in the nation. Based on Communitarianism—the individual’s rights must be balanced with the rights of the community—Sustainable Development is at odds with our Constitution. The guarantees of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are considered to be selfish when ‘balanced’ with the undelineated and
Oklahoma has an opportunity to pass a bill that reaffirms its commitment to the fundamental precepts upon which our nation was founded. As a nation we fought in a war for independence which joined people of differing religious beliefs, cultural origins, and political viewpoints in the birthing of liberty. This hard-worn battle must be fought every day in the halls of Congress and the Senate, and in the statehouses of every state in the Union.
I urge you to recognize that this battle is non-partisan, vital, and elemental to our continuing ideal of ourselves as a nation conceived in liberty and committed to the protection of our citizens. Please vote to support HB1412. Thank you.
Rosa Koire, ASA
Executive Director
Post Sustainability Institute
http://resist21.com/2013/02/05/letter-from-rosa-koire-executive-dir-of-post-sustainability-institute-to-democrats-in-the-oklahoma-legislature-to-support-hb-1412/ - 56k -
From what I can see this movement against agenda 21 seems to be heavy on the tin foil hat.
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/06/inside-agenda-21-international-tyranny-bike-lanes/53844/
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/02/is-the-un-using-bike-paths-to-achieve-world-domination/252572/
Got Smart Growth in your town or county? If so, you’ve got Agenda 21 in your town or county.
Tab 6.qxp - Palm Beach County
http://www.pbcgov.com/strategiceconomicplan/pdf/SmartGrowthAndTransportation.pdf - - Cached - Similar pages
SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS & MEMBERS … Randy Whitfield is the executive director of the Palm Beach County …
Publications | Smart Growth | US EPA
http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/publications.htm - 119k -
Reply to this comment
We’ve got some agenda 21 enthusiasts here in Locaville so I can tell you it’s not an imagined conspiracy theory. But some people overblow the threat and say we are going to be forced into sharing our homes, etc. But they do push the whole beehive living model even though that’s popular with only a small segement of the population. All it takes is one high rise condo project with 2 sales out of 70 to nip that in the bud.
I hate to see this used as an excuse to stop building bike paths though.
I’m guessing the fear is heavy on the tin foil hat
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/02/is-the-un-using-bike-paths-to-achieve-world-domination/252572/
“I’m guessing the fear is heavy on the tin foil hat”
That is exactly what Rosa Koire said you would hear when this was brought up. Then she said “so what” tell them to do the research.
Monday, 04 June 2012 04:25
Alabama Adopts First Official State Ban on UN Agenda 21
Alabama became the first state to adopt a tough law protecting private property and due process by prohibiting any government involvement with or participation in a controversial United Nations scheme known as Agenda 21. Activists from across the political spectrum celebrated the measure’s approval as a significant victory against the UN “sustainability” plot, expressing hope that similar sovereignty-preserving measures would be adopted in other states as the nationwide battle heats up.
The Alabama Senate Bill (SB) 477 legislation, known unofficially among some supporters as the “Due Process for Property Rights” Act, was approved unanimously by both the state House and Senate. After hesitating for a few days, late last month Republican Governor Robert Bentley finally signed into law the wildly popular measure — but only after heavy pressure from activists forced his hand.
Virtually no mention of the law was made in the establishment press. But analysts said the measure was likely the strongest protection against the UN scheme passed anywhere in America so far. The law, aimed at protecting private property rights, specifically prevents all state agencies and local governments in Alabama from participating in the global scheme in any way.
The U.S. Senate, of course, has never formally ratified Agenda 21. But the executive branch — in conjunction with accomplices at the international, state, and local levels — has for two decades been quietly attempting to impose the plan on Americans by stealth, mostly using deceptive terms like “Smart Growth” and “Green.” And proponents of the global scheme consistently threaten that states seeking to protect citizens from the UN plot could end up losing some federal funds.
“Every time you take a dollar of federal money, there’s strings attached,” explained Ken Freeman, chairman of the Alabama-based group Alliance for Citizens Rights (ACR), an organization that fought hard to ensure that the Governor signed the bill into law. “We were originally walking soft on this issue, to tell you the truth, because when things were going our way, why change anything?”
But when Gov. Bentley did not immediately approve the bill, Freeman told a reporter, ACR turned the activism up a notch, urging citizens to contact the Governor’s office and express their support for the measure. The grassroots pressure paid off: Alabama became the first state to be officially shielded by law from UN-linked anti-property rights scheming.
“It seems that Agenda 21 does actually bring people together in communities — just not in the way the U.N. had hoped for,” remarked Justice Gilpin-Green in a column for the conservative site Townhall, citing Freeman and other instrumental supporters of the effort. “Hopefully other states can mirror Alabama’s determined nature in passing their anti-Agenda 21 legislation. It was citizen awareness and direct action that finally brought about the needed changes last week and that same awareness and action will be needed for the future of every other state.”
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11592-alabama-adopts-first-official-state-ban-on-un-agenda-21 - 56k -
When G W Bush wanted to build a new stadium for his Rangers, he had no problem stealing people’s homes for a parking lot.
The Bush’s are all about stealing people’s land for the Community.
“The Bush’s are all about stealing people’s land for the Community.”
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Expect nothing less from the Bush Crime Family.
Wasn’t I just saying the other day that effective city-wide bike paths were only found in liberal cities?
Now we’ve got the knuckledraggers thinking bike paths are a UN one-world government plot! Alabama, that long-time bastion and defender of freedom, has now banned them.
Seriously, how pitiful can you get?
Rosa Koire is a liberal Democrat who happens to be gay, she is smart, articulate and my new hero. If you listen to this interview Behind the Green Mask, skip to the 2 minute mark and you won’t have to listen to the start of the radio program.
01/27/2013
hey, canada! don’t get fooled again! - Democrats Against UN …
http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2013/01/hey-canada-dont-get-fooled-again.html - 22k - Cached - Similar pages
HEY, CANADA! DON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN! 01/27/2013. 0 Comments. Listen to a Canadian radio interview on UN Agenda 21 in Canada …
From posts on the blog, we gather that The Pimp/RAL/manyothernames works for, or knows about, pre-fab homes. Great. Pre-fab is a great idea.
The Pimp claims that he can build houses “on your lot” for $50-$60/square foot. For fun, I poked around the net for pricing. The lowest example I found was $64/ square foot. If he can find something lower, I invite him to post it. And then try to find a buyer actually willing to live in such a POS house. A mobile home is about $51, but that’s not really “on your lot.”
Yesterday, Pimp said that labor and materials for houses — I assume just the house, not the land — cost the same from state to state. They do NOT. They may cost the same in the factory, but at the very least, someone’s got to move the house from the factory to “your lot.” This alone costs more. I’ve listed two examples below.
The Pimp demanded to know how much we all paid per square foot for our debt junkie houses. Very well, Pimp, I paid $78 / sq ft for my HOUSE, which is right in line with these prices. A greater fraction of the value of my property is in the LAND. Why should I include the land value in the price/sq ft? You never do.
Here are some sample price/sq ft for pre-fab homes:
Single-wide mobile home: $51*
Blu Homes: (modern green design) Most of the US: $204 - $290
Blu Homes: (modern green design) CA, Canada, HI: add ~10%
Schumacher Homes: $64-$110
Phoenix custom homes: $73 for basic basic “Harvest Gold” (!) rambler
Irontown Homes “Walker” 3/2 rambler Utah: $111
Irontown Homes “Walker” 3/2 rambler CA and CO: $139
http://www.bluhomes.com/homes/pricing/
http://www.schumacherhomes.com/floorplanfilter.aspx?mn=big
http://www.phoenixcustomhomes.us/id84.html
http://www.irontownhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Predesign-specials-Pricing-UT.pdf
http://www.irontownhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Predesign-specials-Pricing-CA-CO.pdf
—————
*Smallest single wide = 14′x60′ = 720 sq ft
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/advisor/answers/renting-and-real-estate-20110426160519AAX9kSS.html
*cheapest single wide = $37000
http://home.costhelper.com/mobile-home.html
Confusing marked up list prices for absolute crap with construction cost?
Pimp says that his price per square foot is what you should pay because it includes profit for the company. He hasn’t mentioned that it includes the company’s profit often in the past few months because his style of discourse has been deteriorating from already low level, but he has mentioned it in the past. However, the fact that he says regularly that his price per square foot is the most anyone should be *paying* includes an implication that he is talking about what the list price should be, not his company’s construction costs.
“I poked around the net for pricing.”>/i>
There it is folks. That’s the extent of our blog debt junkies credibility.
And as for you school marm, your consulting fee’s are massively inflated. They’re not getting their moneys woth. Get your act together.
I buy the material and hire very experienced workers (15 to 20 years) to do the work. I can hire plumbers, electricians, drywaller’s, carpenters, and commercial roofers for between $15 to $20 (cash) per hour. Painters and landscapers for $10 to $12.50.
I pay what they ask.
My prices per sq feet are a lot lower than pimps. If you pay what pimp is advocating you will lose a LOTof money? Pimp has to pay insurance, fica, taxes, overhead, profits all that nonsense. I cut of the lazy CELL PHONE CONTRACTOR aka THE WINDSHIELD COWBOY.
I do this with my Cars also. I have a fleet of 8 cars and my mechanic Pete fixes them for $25(cash) per hour. He even pickup the parts comes to my building after work or on weekends and maintains them. I have the air compressor and various tools and what I don’t have he brings them. Most mechanics can work on their cars after work at the dealership they are employed at and so if I need anything done that cannot be done at my building he brings the cars to his dealership and fixes them.
All true.
Insurance? Yeah, Yeah ,Yeah save it
Pricing of a project is also dependant on the neighborhood, homeowner’s profession, type of cars in the driveway. Some people like to prove to the contractors that they can afford their services. They want to shower contractors with money. Home owners at times want to tell the neighbors how much they paid for a certain project. In return the contactor has to put on a show by having uniformed employees, nice clean lettered trucks etc. Pricing also involves a dog and pony show.
Over paying is the American way
“Over paying is the American way”
Yep. That’s what Dumb Money does.
wow
I remember the good old days when you could pick up a nice double wide for 60k.
The way to keep the price of building a home down is to do the labor yourself. unfortunately most people do not have the skills or the ability to work that hard these days.
“Good old days”? $60k for a double wide?
Considering shop built structures are cost about half that, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
…nor do many of the “contractors”.
I see second trailers for much less. But the park fees seem very high.
“I paid $78 / sq ft for my HOUSE, which is right in line with these prices. A greater fraction of the value of my property is in the LAND”
The used building lot is worth much more than the old house built upon it. That is interesting, but I suspect very unlikely. Have you made this split up in your own mind? One of the advantages of buying a used house is that the building lot has been consumed, kind of like driving a car off the lot. It is worth a lot less than when it was virgin, because someone has had their way with it. So, you paid something like $200/ft2 for an old house? No doubt you got a place that makes you happy, or will when it is fixed up, and you can afford to bring the place up to date, and you can afford to pay two times what you “paid” because it was borrowed. You can afford it and that works for you.
If people could only pay what they could actually pay, well most of us wouldn’t even have a job, and houses wouldn’t be so expensive.
well most of us wouldn’t even have a job, and houses wouldn’t be so expensive.
Houses are quite expensive when you have no job.
Indeed. Even more so when your construct is the debt donkey wheel and then you have no job.
So if people didn’t borrow, there would be far fewer jobs?
Sounds like an argument if favor of borrowing.
well most of us wouldn’t even have a job
Only to the addict and the pusher. No one else would think such a thing.
No one else would think such a thing.
Really? Seems like a reasonable conclusion.
If people could only pay what they could actually pay, well most of us wouldn’t even have a job
The majority wouldn’t have jobs if we stopped borrowing? How would that be a good thing?
Really? Nobody will have jobs if suckers like you stop borrowing?
You come up with some strange notions Liar.
They are many.
Guess you couldn’t defend or explain what you said, Blue.
Good thing Pimples came in to distract.
Don’t duck and weave, explain your lie and why you’re lying to the readers here.
Blueskye, for whatever it is worth - at 3.5 - 4% the interest over 30 years is 61 or 71%. So not exactly double.
For a 15 yr loan the interest works out to 29% or 33% of the loan amount.
I’m of the opionion that if you can’t afford a house with a 15 yr loan it would be wise to rethink the purchase.
AP Exclusive: Likely tax cheats flock South, West
AP | 4/14/13
Worried the Internal Revenue Service might target you for an audit? You probably should be if you own a small business in one of the wealthy suburbs of Los Angeles.
You might also be wary if you’re a small-business owner in one of dozens of communities near San Francisco, Houston, Atlanta or the District of Columbia.
A new study by the National Taxpayer Advocate used confidential IRS data to show large clusters of potential tax cheats in these five metropolitan areas. The IRS uses the information to target taxpayers for audits.
The taxpayer advocate, Nina Olsen, runs an independent office within the IRS. She got access to the data as part of an effort to learn more about why some taxpayers are more likely to cheat than others.
The study also looked at tax compliance in different industries, and found that people who own construction companies or real estate rental firms may be more likely to fudge their taxes than business owners in other fields.
Many of the communities identified by the study are very wealthy, including Beverly Hills and Newport Beach in California. Others are more middle class, such as New Carrollton, Md., a Washington suburb, and College Park, Ga., home to a section of Atlanta’s massive airport.
“the District of Columbia.”
Where the real “tax cheats” are.
Why cheat when you’re getting the money back anyway in the form of salary/perks/commissions, etc.
Not to mention insider trading.
It’s almost over, folks. China, via NoKo, has those big phalluses pointed at various targets. Will they pull the trigger? I dare ‘em.
I’m in Colorado Springs right now. Maybe we’ll get nuked today.
Not sure it would be any safer here in San Diego, where Northrup Grumman has several office complexes a short drive away from home (stumbled across one of them by chance yesterday driving home from CostCo by the scenic route…).
Don’t let historians ever forget!
The TurboTax defense
Rodney P. Mock and Nancy E. Shurtz
Published 4:00 am, Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2009, before the Senate Finance Committee hearing on his nomination. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AP
As April 15 approaches, we remember when the tax preparation software TurboTax first gained national recognition - the day in 2009 when Timothy Geithner was questioned by the Senate on his nomination to be the U.S. Treasury Secretary.
The IRS had discovered that Geithner had failed to pay his self-employment taxes (i.e., Social Security and Medicare) on his International Monetary Fund income. When questioned, he said he used TurboTax and that his returns were not prepared “in a way that caught” his embarrassing mistake. Fortunately for Geithner (although admittedly negligent), the IRS waived his tax penalties. Yet this type of waiver hardly is ever available to similarly situated taxpayers who would owe interest on their back taxes plus a 20 percent penalty.
Cases in the U.S. Tax Court indicate taxpayers have attempted to assert a tax software excuse for penalty relief, but except for two cases, their efforts have largely fallen on deaf ears. Yet, an argument can be made that the advice and guidance provided by tax software should be in most cases the equivalent of the advice of a tax preparer. It is possible that the advice had been programmed incorrectly into the software and thus it makes sense to allow the taxpayers some relief from the IRS’s arsenal of penalties.
The TurboTax defense was successful in Olsen vs. Commissioner, where the taxpayer failed to input into his tax software certain income from his wife’s beneficial interest in a trust because he was “unfamiliar with the form” the couple received. The court determined the “forthright and creditable” taxpayer simply made an “isolated error” in transcribing the information into the software, and thus, penalty relief was warranted.
…
I think all home loans should require tax returns for the basis of the qualifying income. That would stop a lot of tax cheats right there.
They used to. Along with a pay stub. Back in the “bad old days” (ie pre 1995).
Then the government decided to “help” people buy homes and “help” banks make loans…
I think all home loans should require tax returns for the basis of the qualifying income.
Every home loan I’ve ever gotten (~2010 and 2013) required my last 2 years W2, 2 years tax return, and last 2 paystubs for myself and my wife.
If you can’t produce these documents, you shouldn’t be asking for a loan for 100’s of thousands of dollars, IMHO.
Sorry - that kind of thinking is racist and discriminatory…
Now back to the CRA line for you.
Our last mortgage was 1998 originated, and we had to submit what 2banana said, plus more. They put us through the ringer and our FICOs were 800+. Our debt ratios had to pass the test. My, have times changed.
What have to you done with the real cabana boy?
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/opinion/editorial-citizens-bill-would-be-unfair-to-south-f/nXLpw/
Insurance, at least property insurance in FL, seems to be a total ponzi scheme. I’m surprised what these morons are doing is even legal.
First off, it probably helps to talk very quickly about the “theory” of insurance (at least as I learned it in college). First, you have to figure out the value of the asset that you’re insuring. Pretty straightforward (and dropping, but we’ll leave that out for now), not a lot of argument around this.
Next, you figure out the risk of loss. The person who does this is known as an actuary, they look at historic numbers and determine, based on a lot of criteria, how likely a loss is of the given asset that they are underwriting.
So, real simple example; if I want to insure a 100K house and the risk of loss is 1% annually:
100K*1%=1K/yr
And then, on that 1K/yr, we then add the insurance company’s profit.
Why all this math in the morning?? Well, because, per that article “New policies, however, could rise between 60 percent and 84 percent in Palm Beach County for the same property.”
This makes absolutely NO SENSE. It also makes no sense that after a hurricane comes through people’s policies start to double. The only way that makes sense is if, instead of figuring out the risk, in fact, they are just running a ponzi; collecting all the premiums and paying out of the kitty until it’s empty. What this means is that the “risk of loss” number above is off by up to 84%?!? Why even hire people to compute that number, why not just pull it out of the air, it would apparently be just about as accurate.
A hurricane barreling through should, in fact (perfect insurance model) have no impact what-so-ever on your rates. It was figured in; hurricane damage every X years, to your rate ahead of time. In fact, the only thing that should really impact your rate is if you do something to YOUR home or personally that changes your risk profile (like put in a highly flammable roof in fire country, for example).
The highest insurance quote I got last year (after I got dropped again) was about 15K/yr, the lowest was 2.5K (coverage limits held pretty equal). That’s ridiculous people! That’s like shopping a few banks and getting MTG rate offers from 3 to 15%, depending where you shopped.
My experience in S. FL tells me that there’s something fundamentally wrong with the insurance market. It doesn’t make sense that one insurer would be so far off from another when comparing policies. They should all bunch up, perhaps with a few outliers on either end. Instead, what’s happening is that the “Mr Wizard” guys at State Farm have my house at a 10% chance of loss per year and at All State they have that number at 5%!? That makes NO sense (and even less if you extend my example to include the re-insurance market).
Well, you can always pay off your mortgage and self insure.
Another “plus” of the obama housing bubble - insane prices = insane insurance costs
2banana-
We have no mortgage as you know, but to self insure is crazy, unless you have a money tree. We also have earthquake Insurance as So Ca residence.
Your premiums have been used to buy Bernanke Bucks (AKA US Treasuries) plus the insurance industry is one of the biggest players in the highly leveraged collateralize debt markets. You think AIG was a one-off? Nope. Pension funds and insurance companies are bag holders for the the sum of all fears - a 8% 10yr treasury yield would bankrupt them.
“…8% 10yr treasury yield would bankrupt them…”
Luckily we won’t go there again until most of the pig-in-a-python Baby Boom cohort of retirees has gone through the pension system.
Overtaxed,
The insurance market in each state is regulated by a “state” agency that makes the rules and the regulations.
If you have regulations that cause insurance companies to loose more money, or if you have a few too many hurricanes, the insurance companies aren’t going to offer to insure at prices you deem acceptable.
It’s pretty simple. A lot of insurance companies lost their a$$e$ in FLA in the last 10 years, so they have to try and recoup their losses.
Living close the coast is also more costly. Why? Because the losses are higher there probably for a variety of reasons, not just the hurricanes.
Lip
Well reasoned post, thank you.
What I found interesting is the Ca EQ Authority insurance and GeoVera (a private EQ insurance firm) had pretty close premium costs, but the CEA had a lower deducible for our area as I dug into it. CEA has a disclaimer on pg 1 of their policy, when they run out of loot your sol. With private insurance its a guessing game if they will honor the claim as well. Either way you are screwed. But we have it, since 11% of Californians are in the pool. Just found out renters can buy it too. High density policy holders are the real issue. I don’t like that.
The entire state of Florida is a Ponzi scheme since the day is was created.
Remember the reason Florida was originally explored by Europeans 500 years ago was in search of the Fountain of Youth. And greater fools have ever since wandered there in search of whatever elusive form of wealth they expected to find.
Interesting to read some of the headlines this fine AM. Anyone who doesn’t think NoKo is China’s proxy isn’t paying attention. Bwahahaha! But, you know, keep sending Owl Man to SoKo proclaiming “Stop! Or I’ll yell stop again!” Keep outsourcing there. Keep buying their defective crap. Keep insourcing their scientists and techies so they can engage in espionage. Keep borrowing from them.
What a decadent, perverted bunch Washington is.
“What a decadent, perverted bunch Washington is.”
Rome had nothing, I mean NOTHING on DC. Believe it.
Harry Truman’s motto was, “The buck stops here.”
Congress’s motto has always been, “Anything for a buck.”
The corporate motto is, “Keep passing the buck.”
The Supreme Court motto is , “Define a ‘buck’.”
Clinton’s motto: “Whatever the definition of a buck is.”
November 30, 2011
“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.”
Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project
Harvey Ruvin Biography
On National and International Levels
Harvey Ruvin served as the President of the National Association of Counties (NACo) (1987-88). He chaired separate NACo Task Forces on Immigration, Environment and Energy, and the Liability Insurance crisis. NACo is the only national organization representing the interests and acting as a clearing house for the more than 3,000 county governments in America.
Ruvin is a past chairman and current member of the Urban Consortium (UC) of Public Technology, Inc. (PTI). PTI is the technology arm of its parents, the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties and the International City/County Management Association. The UC is a coalition of the Nation’s 50 largest urban government seeking to apply emerging technologies to local government needs.
In addition to his leadership of America’s Counties and the Urban Consortium, Ruvin’s service at the NATIONAL (where he has served five Presidents in an advisory capacity) and INTERNATIONAL level has included:
Member, Intergovernmental Science Engineering and Technology Advisory Panel to Office of Science Advisor to the President (Presidents Ford and Carter, 1975-80).
Member, President’s Council on Energy Efficiency, as well as Vice Chairman of Local Government Energy Policy Advisory Committee (President Carter, 1977-80).
Served a four-year term on the prestigious Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). He chaired the ACIR Research committee. (Presidents Reagan and Bush, 1987-91).
Served as a member of the President Clinton 1988-91 Sustainable Communities Task Force of the President’s Counc
il On Sustainable Development (PCSD).
Member, Board of Directors of the National Association of Counties (1983-present).
Member, Board of Directors of National Association of Regional Councils (1973-1978).
Member, Board of Directors of the Community Associations Institute (1978-1982).
Vice Chairman of National Immigration Forum (1980-1984).
Delegate to the United Nations World Congress for a Sustainable Future, representing America’s Counties at this first-ever international effort to coordinate local governments’ environmental initiatives (1990).
Vice Chairman, Executive Committee of ICLEI which is the 15 member governing body of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). ICLEI is membered by 600 local governments from all over the planet, seeking pro-active ways to combat global environmental and sustainability concerns. He serves as President of USA – ICLEI. Inc. – the corporate entity operating the organization’s efforts in America.
ICLEI has been designated to represent local government at all United Nations’ meetings dealing with the environment and sustainability.
http://bradleycountynews.wordpress.com/2011/11/ - 206k -
Another great example of groups that sound like they are for something that they are actually against.
…and of a scumbag who produces nothing but pomp and pontifications and is paid well to act as the front man for corporations.
“…and of a scumbag who produces nothing but pomp and pontifications and is paid well to act as the front man for corporations.”
Public-Private Partnerships.
300 million guns in the hands of American people now. 70 million of them purchased since Obamao’s first inauguration. My handguns and rifle will help me keep my individual rights a while longer.
In response to Hazard’s post on Harry Ruvin.
It’s “Go Time” but not with guns. I find myself in the seemingly odd position of being led by a liberal Democrat woman who is openly gay.
In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.
OK, I get it. What now? What can I do?
AWARENESS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE RESISTANCE
First take a deep breath and realize that you are not alone in this. There are people all over your state, all over America, all over the world, who are with you.
You may be looking for a leader. Take a look in the mirror. This is the real face of grassroots. YOU.
To start, the best thing you can do is to read more and open your eyes to the workings of your town.
Amazingly enough, flyering is one of the most effective ways of reaching a large number of people in a short time. Get up early on a weekend morning and take these around different neighborhoods for a few weeks. Drop them on porches, don’t put them in mailboxes (they’re FEDERAL property, apparently). Don’t let people waylay you and draw you into conversation or you’ll waste your Saturday arguing instead of putting out the info. Tell them to go to the website on the flyer if they want more info. If they want to help tell them to make copies of the flyer and walk them around. Take the flyers with you to the store, coffee shop, meetings, and give them out. It only costs about $5 to make 100 black and white copies. Go for it!
If you’re a skeptic, and you should be, keep reading and asking the questions. Be a sharp researcher. If you read about a group that is advocating for SmartGrowth, for instance, take a look at who’s in the group. Google the names of the people running the organization. Follow those links. Who funds them? What influence do they have on your community? For instance, in our town, Santa Rosa, CA, there is a group that is trying to develop new neighborhood associations in conjunction with the City so that they can hand-pick neighborhood ‘leaders’ and shut out other voices. It’s called the Neighborhood Alliance, a group founded by the local president of the UN-USA Association. Didn’t know there was a local chapter of the United Nations in your town? Neither did we. What else? The other founder is the director of advocacy for the California Lung Association. A check of that group shows that they lobby the legislature for smart growth (that term means multi-story residential condos stacked on top of retail stores next to railway lines, proposed rail lines, or transit corridors, the preferred development style for Agenda 21). Surprised? We were. That explained why the Board of the neighborhood association went nuts when my partner was elected neighborhood president. They threatened her with a trial to remove her when they found out she and I had organized a group and sued to stop a local redevelopment project. You get the point.
DEMOCRATS AGAINST U. N. AGENDA 21 - OK, So what is Agenda …
http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/ - 38k -
The corporations have done more to take away civil rights than the gov has ever done and these fruitcakes are worried about Agenda 21.
You really can’t fix our kind of stupid.
70 million of them purchased since Obamao’s first inauguration ??
And I would wager most were purchased in southern states…
Got Smart Growth in your town or county? If so, you’ve got Agenda 21 in your town or county.
Well SOB, guess what we have here in Palm Beach County.
Tab 6.qxp - Palm Beach County
http://www.pbcgov.com/strategiceconomicplan/pdf/SmartGrowthAndTransportation.pdf - - Cached - Similar pages
SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS & MEMBERS … Randy Whitfield is the executive director of the Palm Beach County …
Publications | Smart Growth | US EPA
http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/publications.htm - 119k -
BUT HE’S GOING TO TAKE OUR GUNS ANY DAY NOW! ANY DAY NOW!
Yep, the man who made it legal to carry in national parks is going to come take your guns!
SUCKERS!!!!
“Got Smart Growth in your town or county? If so, you’ve got Agenda 21 in your town or county.”
“BUT HE’S GOING TO TAKE OUR GUNS ANY DAY NOW! ANY DAY NOW!”
It all ties together.
Remember this link our Blog DebtJunkie provided to substantiate massively inflated housing prices and her own tragic error of paying them?
–> http://www.building-cost.net/
That’s a typical example of the “research” Dumb Money does. Understandable. But when Dumb Money attempts to float it as real is when we step in to expose the ignorance.
Now… Months ago after this ruse was attempted, we did a quick review and mark up of this charade… here it is.
http://imageshack.us/f/87/estimate.png/
For the public…… Material and labor costs are the same anywhere in the country. Anywhere. Don’t let charlatans, paid hacks and dumb money detract you from performing your own analysis and estimate on the value of a house in price per square foot. We bid and win bridge and highway work in tens of millions of dollars based on price per square foot. There is no other way to do it.
Material and labor costs are the same anywhere in the country ??
Really….What is the cost of a sheet of 3/8 plywood in California vs Oregon ??
dude I cannot answer that but I was in home depot the other day and a 15/16″ sheet of OSB was about 20 bucks with tax and the new 1% lumber tax in CA.
with tax and the new 1% lumber tax in CA ??
Well the answer is quite simple really and it Debunks RAL’s statement…California has very high sales taxes…Oregon has none…So, effectively, the cost of materials are higher in California even if the product face value is the same in both states…
Sales tax accounts for your fantasy of 3x construction costs? Once again, you’ve demonstrated you’re out of your league.
But we expect nothing less from a “contractor” who sources materials from Home Depot.
How is it that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA can offer federal mortgage guarantees for so much cheaper than private mortgage insurers do for the same level of default risk, yet remain competitive for their shareholders (U.S. taxpayers)?
RISK DOCTOR
Let the FHA Charge for Risk, Like Fannie and Freddie Do
by Clifford Rossi
APR 11, 2013 12:45pm ET
The mortgage securities business has become a shell game. Consider the disconnect in pricing of credit guarantees between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, on the one hand, and the Federal Housing Administration on the other.
One of the important differences in pricing between the government-sponsored enterprises and FHA is that Fannie and Freddie adjust their prices to some degree for risk while FHA largely charges fees that are flat across risk attributes. And although FHA has raised upfront and annual mortgage insurance premiums since the crisis, the all-in pricing for a GSE mortgage-backed security and a corresponding Ginnie Mae MBS (which is where most FHA loans end up) leaves FHA the clear winner for the riskiest pools. In that regard, we are merely shifting risk from one set of federally insured entities (the GSEs as wards of the state) to another. There does not seem to be any apparent rhyme or reason to this pricing — one more piece of evidence of the lack of cohesion in pricing in federally dominated mortgage markets.
The issue is far more than academic. The latest actuary report estimates that the FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund is underwater by more than $16 billion although the Obama administration’s estimate released Wednesday places it now at just under $1 billion. If FHA employed a more granular pricing approach, charging much higher premiums for riskier attribute combinations and less for lower-risk attributes, it would reduce the risk of the agency’s troubled MMIF over time.
Look at the pricing decision between a pool of 95% loan-to-value, 660 FICO score fixed-rate 30-year mortgages going into a 3% coupon Fannie Mae or a comparable GNMA security. The Fannie bond was recently quoted at $104.09 per $100 of principal, the GNMA at $105.56. For this pool, Fannie would charge an “adverse” delivery fee of 25 basis points, a loan-level pricing adjustment of 225 basis points. And since the loans have such little equity and low credit scores, a private mortgage insurer would charge 350 basis points for the risk that it bears.
For the same pool, FHA would charge an upfront premium of 175 basis points and an annual premium of 130 basis points. If we further assume that the pools have an effective life of five years, then that annual premium takes 650 basis points off the dollar price of the bond.
Taking into consideration origination and differential servicing costs that also affect the bond coupon, the net price of the Fannie MBS is 95.24 per $100 of principal while the GNMA MBS is $97.57. In this example, the higher-priced GNMA MBS is the “best execution” for delivery of 95% LTV, 660 mortgage pools.
This simple illustration of relative mortgage pricing underscores the need to revisit FHA’s approach to pricing and it has implications for the extent of the federal guarantee as well.
…
How long can the FED backstop the mortgage market and stock market?
I guess if the money never reaches the worker bees inflation wont be a problem.
Exactly….i never got a dime….Just the lunacy of this get me angry..
$40 billion equals 100 million households at $400 per MONTH
Wages have been decoupled from inflation for decades.
How many times do I have to explain voodoo economics to you people?
Does anyone know how much of a windfall GSE bond owners collectively reaped from Uncle Sam at the point when the federal guarantee went from implicit to explicit in the wake of the Fall 2008 Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac collapse, right at the point when the fools who speculated in these MBS should have lost their shirts?
Does the Fed own every dollar it prints, which it can then use to competitively bid on whatever dollar-valued asset sales happen to be taking place? This private ownership business gets very confusing when a single federal agency has monopoly rights to mine the Bitcoin of the realm.
the bubble is all in your head. scripps ranch is booming.
How much of these stellar GSE profits can be directly attributed to the Fed’s QE3 MBS purchase program?
Do the Fed’s QE3 MBS purchases, which presumably allow the GSEs to sell their MBS at inflated prices to the private market bid, get counted as “shoveled in” taxpayer bailout money? Because I am thinking that with proper accounting for $40 bn a month in Fed-funded MBS purchases, the U.S. taxpayer has probably “shoveled in” a lot more than $116 bn worth of GSE bailouts.
Perhaps the stealth tax of the Fed’s Bitcoin mint is different than the explicit tax that shows up on your W-2s, since nobody exactly knows up front who will ultimately pay it and how. Or does the operation of the Federal Reserve Bitcoin mint not count as “taxes,” since they have a money tree farm hidden away somewhere which they aren’t revealing?
Fannie Mae CEO: Taxpayers Will Get Their Money Back and Then Some
By Meg Handley
April 12, 2013
Fannie Mae earned $17.2 billion in 2012, is biggest annual profit ever, which could mean dividends for taxpayers.
With Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both reporting record profits for 2012, taxpayers might be wondering if there’s any reward for bailing out the agencies blamed for the housing bust – that is, besides saving the global financial system from imminent ruin.
According to Fannie Mae CEO Tim Mayopoulos, the government-sponsored enterprises aren’t the only ones that will be rolling in the dough. In his first TV interview since the company reported a more than $17 billion profit for 2012, Mayopoulos told Bloomberg TV that U.S. taxpayers could actually see a net gain from the $116 billion they’ve shoveled into the beleaguered mortgage giant.
…
If it were that easy then should we draw the conclusion that using taxpayers money to support bankrupt institutions and corporations we can make lots of money.
What is behind this? Doesn’t anyone in the MSM ask how this unprecedented price support to housing works in the long term. Especially, when truly middle class people cannot afford a house. In the end, the economy should collapse when all every family does is work to pay for the house.
Do the Fed’s QE3 MBS purchases… get counted as “shoveled in” taxpayer bailout money?
I thought they were just printing it up?
all of the profits.
Is there anyone left in the country who is giving out loans backed by private money besides owner financing?
What does it take to qualify so you can originate mortgages that conform to fannie and freddies guidelines and thus can be sold to them?
I always wondered what happened to az_lender last 2 posts from hbb search:
Comment by az_lender
2011-04-06 02:44:41
Time marches on. Five or six years ago I thought the housing market would turn up in 2012 or so. That was based partly on Ivy Zellman’s mortgage reset chart, and some general feeling that nothing lasts forever. But the actions of our govt have so slowed the crash that the recovery still seems far away. What, 2015? I don’t know.
I have a positive cash flow on the apartment building I bought last October, even though I rent ‘em out heated in Maine. Still collecting fuel oil on a prepaid contract I negotiated last fall; it’ll be a shock when that runs out. Guess I could raise the rents a teeny bit, but will first make sure everyone has window blinds.
Loan demand is very great. But I have to maintain SOME liquidity. So I keep telling you people, if anyone wants to get into lending out your own money at around 8% on small houses in Florida, email me mimigerstell at yahoo dot com. I would not take any cut but would walk you through a first deal. What’s in it for me is maintaining my good relations with the persons who bring me the potential clients.
Had a little hassle with some heirs when one of my clients died. The kids were fighting over her property and therefore could not agree about who should be paying me. A $1500 bill from my lawyer got them to wise up and sell the place in a hurry. It wasn’t underwater, so they still received some money.
Other than that, no problems since 2003. Oh yeah, there are people who need “workouts” - and I’m happy to reduce their payments a little bit, stretch out the amortization, whatever it takes to keep them paying their money!
Comment by az_lender
2012-10-30 03:10:51
Of those who were frequently posting on HBB 5-7 years ago, many became real-estate investors themselves after a time. I haven’t read the blog for a while, and I see in yesterday’s “bits bucket” a clash between bulls and bears. My personal opinion matches my present investment position. (a) I own an apartment building and (b) I own a lot of mortgage notes, as I have done for nearly 20 years. I am interested only in the income, which means I can afford a depreciation of a few percent per year, but not a rapid further bust. Nor do I expect it. Bump along the bottom is my best guess.
Thanks for the update, that was interesting.
Where does it say in the Fed’s charter that they can legally hand over profits to specially favored firms?
I don’t know the Fed charter, but I would think the real question would be “where does it specifically prohibit this?”
Where does it specifically prohibit them from personally loaning out trillions of dollars at below-market interest rates to all of their favorite banks across the globe? And if it isn’t expressly prohibited, then why don’t they just do it?
Oh wait…
Hedge funds have their hands out for their shares of the $40 bn in Fed-funded MBS purchases.
Hedge Funds Wagering on Fannie Reincarnation: Mortgages
By Katherine Burton, Zeke Faux & Jody Shenn - Apr 8, 2013 2:07 PM
April 3 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Representative Scott Garrett, a Republican from New Jersey and chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, talks about the outlook for the housing market and his proposal to wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac without disrupting the market. Garrett, speaking with Erik Schatzker and Scarlet Fu on Bloomberg Television’s “Market Makers,” also discusses the potential imposition of legal restrictions on banks deemed too big to fail. (Source: Bloomberg)
Investors including hedge funds are buying the preferred stock of government-controlled mortgage firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a long-shot bet they will have a future as private companies.
Fannie Mae (FNMA)’s 8.25 percent of preferred shares have more than doubled this year after the company reported record earnings. Some investors see the odds rising the two loan guarantors may somehow return to private ownership without cutting out existing investors, according to Bose George, an analyst at Keefe Bruyette & Woods in New York. The securities have a par value of $25, meaning investors could recoup more than five times the current price of $4.26.
“The idea is eventually, as these companies have paid back their debt to the government, they could potentially be turned back on,” George said. “From our perspective, you can only make an argument for this if you think the government’s going to change the rules somehow to benefit the preferred shareholders.”
The gains come after the U.S. Treasury Department changed the terms of the enterprises’ bailout last year to force them to turn over profits to the government. The agreement provides no mechanism for them to repay the $187.5 billion they owe the government from their 2008 bailout, a prerequisite to a change in their status.
…
Cyprus Bailout Deal Is Hit By New Fears
A warning about political meddling in the independence of the country’s central bank raises fresh doubts over the rescue.
2:17pm UK, Sunday 14 April 2013
A bank employee shouts slogans and holds a banner reading in Greek: “employees are paying”
Cyprus’ central bank governor has warned he will only work with ministers on the country’s EU bailout if the bank’s independence is respected.
The comments from governor Panicos Demetriades come following a rift in Nicosia between the bank and political leaders over the EU/IMF-brokered bailout.
Last week, the government said the total bailout cost had jumped 6bn euros (£5.1bn) to 23bn (£19.6bn).
Mr Demetriades was appointed last May by the communist former administration but tension with the ruling centre-right government, in power for just two months, has deepened.
There has been growing pressure on him to resign over his handling of the economic crisis amid an unprecedented levy placed on bank accounts.
…
Red sky at night, sailor’s delight.
Red sky at morning, sailors take warning.
The reason why central banks bought gold in large quantities last year should be obvious by now: TO FINANCIALLY ENGINEER A GOLD PRICE PREMIUM WHICH COULD BE USED TO FUND SOVEREIGN DEBT BAILOUTS OFF THE PROCEEDS OF GOLD SALES.
It’s really a beautiful plan, as the “tax” to fund bailouts was willingly paid by those who participated in gold speculation during a parabolic bubble price blowout. What better way is there to raise taxes than on a voluntary basis?
And in case you are missing this, there is no reason the same bubble engineering principle could not be used by central banks to raise taxes in other asset classes, then profit off the proceeds of asset sales before taking away the punch bowl that was used to foster the irrational exuberance needed to get greater fools to willingly purchase bubble-valued assets.
Analysis: If Cyprus can sell gold to help bailout, why not others?
Related Video
Cyprus to offload €400M gold
By Jan Harvey and Clara Denina
LONDON | Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:49pm EDT
(Reuters) - Heavily indebted euro zone nations such as Italy and Portugal could come under pressure to put their bullion reserves to work as a result of plans for Cyprus to sell gold to meet its financing needs.
A European Commission assessment of what Cyprus needs to do as part of its European Union/International Monetary Fund bailout showed Cyprus is expected to sell in excess gold reserves to raise around 400 million euros ($523 million).
Other struggling euro area countries may be pushed to take note. Between them, for example, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain, hold more than 3,230 metric tons (3561 tons) of gold between them, worth nearly 125 billion euros at today’s prices.
The lion’s share of that - 2,451.8 metric tons - belongs to Italy. But Portugal and Spain also hold hundreds of metric tons and gold is currently trading around $1,558.95 per ounce in spot terms, or 1,189 euros.
The metal makes up more than 90 percent of Portugal’s foreign exchange holdings, and 72.2 percent of Italy’s. India, by contrast, holds less than 10 percent of its reserves in gold.
Gold sales on their own would be far from a magic bullet to solve euro zone financing problems: Italy’s entire gold reserves, for example, are worth less than 95 billion euros, against outstanding debt of around 1.685 trillion euros.
But the Cyprus situation shows that even a relatively small gold sale may help address severe debt problems. Cyprus’ gold sale would allow it to easily come up with around 3 percent of what it must contribute to the bailout.
It is something that has the market somewhat concerned given that a big sale would push down the price. Central bank gold buying was one of the few areas of demand to increase last year at a time jewelry, coin and gold-bar buying was on the wane.
…
http://silverdoctors.com/10-of-us-annual-silver-supply-just-vaporized/#more-25002
10% of US Annual Silver Supply Just Vaporized…
April 13, 2013 By The Doc 33 Comments
*BREAKING
5 million ounces of annual silver supply and 500,000 ounces of annual gold supply have just been vaporized landslided.
Rio Tinto’s Kennecott mine in Utah- the US’ 2nd largest silver mine and world’s largest copper mine has just suffered a massive landslide which will likely shut down production at the mine for years as upwards of 1 billion tons of dirt and ore have collapsed into the basin.
10% of US annual silver production just vanished. Good thing there aren’t any physical supply issues in silver currently or anything…
Astonishing Photos below:
According to Rio Tinto’s VP of Marketing Vania Grandi, Kennecott produces up to 5 million ounces of silver, and 1/2 million ounces of gold annually:
“We produce about 3 (million) to 5 million ounces of silver a year and 300,000 to 500,000 ounces of gold,” said Vania Grandi, vice president of marketing for the Precious Metals Copper Group at Rio Tinto — parent company of Kennecott Utah Copper Corp.
The Media Release from Rio Tinto:
Kennecott Utah Copper’s Bingham Canyon Mine pit wall slide
At 9.30 pm local time on 10 April 2013, Kennecott Utah Copper’s Bingham Canyon Mine experienced a slide along a geotechnical fault line of its north eastern wall. Movement on the north eastern wall had accelerated in recent weeks and pre-emptive measures were taken to relocate facilities and roads prior to the slide. All employees are safe and accounted for.
Mine operations are currently suspended while experts assess the extent of the slide and impact on operations.
About Rio Tinto
Rio Tinto is a leading international mining group headquartered in the UK, combining Rio Tinto plc, a London and New York Stock Exchange listed company, and Rio Tinto Limited, which is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange.
Rio Tinto’s business is finding, mining, and processing mineral resources. Major products are aluminium, copper, diamonds, thermal and metallurgical coal, uranium, gold, industrial minerals (borax, titanium dioxide and salt) and iron ore. Activities span the world and are strongly represented in Australia and North America with significant businesses in Asia, Europe, Africa and South America.|
From VisitUtah.org:
In addition to copper, the mine also produces about 400,000 ounces of gold, 4 million ounces of silver and 20 million pounds of molybdenum.
Located 28 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, the mine is 2 3/4-miles across and 3/4-mile deep. It is so big that it can be seen from outer space. Standing at the overlook within the Bingham Canyon Mine, you can see, hear, and feel the breathtaking and awesome magnitude of this massive man-made excavation. Kennecott Utah Copper’s Bingham Canyon Mine is the world’s largest man-made excavation!
Those guys mining gold in the Bering Staight seem to be doing fine.
It’s official…just saw Kendra Todd on the teevee.
I didn’t know who Kendra Todd was and had to look her up her. Proud to say I had no idea of her existence.
disregard second “her”, editing error.
“bubbles are for bathtubs”.
This may be the next book I tackle, once I finish the last1250 pages of Les Miserables.
Review: The Robespierres of central banking
By Dominic Elliott
April 5, 2013
By Dominic Elliott
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
The most lasting inheritance of the 2008 financial crisis may be a change in the purpose of central banks. From the 1980s until 2007, most believed that monetary authorities should primarily use a policy interest rate to combat inflation. Interventions in the markets or in the financial system were outside the remit, or so the orthodox view went. Neil Irwin’s “The Alchemists” shows how that thinking has been turned on its head.
Central banks now have vast power. The European Central Bank, led by Jean-Claude Trichet, flouted the spirit of the Maastricht Treaty by buying bonds of euro zone states; Mervyn King’s independent Bank of England became part of the political debate as it engaged in monetary easing on a vast scale; and Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve has experimented with even more radical and creative ways to fix the U.S. economy. Irwin, a Washington Post journalist, underscores just how revolutionary those moves were.
The book breezes through central banking’s troubled history, starting with the first central banker, Johan Palmstruch, a jailed debtor who assumed a new identity. He plunged Sweden into an economic depression and died a much-reviled man. Reichsbank President Rudolf van Haverstein’s unfortunate penchant for monetising German debt during World War One was another low point.
Irwin really provides spice, however, with a blow-by-blow account of the financial crisis and its aftermath. There’s a fine level of detail: Mervyn King dog-sledding at a central bankers’ convention in the remote Canadian territory of Iqaluit, for example. Central banking seems sexy after all, even if the claim that French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s walk at Deauville with German Chancellor Angela Merkel was the “most consequential stroll on a beach in history” is exaggerated.
Still, it’s an achievement to produce a page-turner that also explains the various ideologies of central banking. In essence, central banking has been a game of trial and error. And the seat-of-the-pants decision-making in the euro zone involved many strange manoeuvres. Bundesbank head Axel Weber reneged on his support of Trichet’s bond-buying plan, placing the euro zone in even greater peril. Meanwhile, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the International Monetary Fund, was promising bailout money before he was authorised to do so.
Of the book’s three main protagonists – Trichet, Bernanke and King – only the U.S. Fed chairman comes out remotely well. His openness to new ideas is contrasted with King’s stubbornness and Trichet’s self-importance.
The author could have done more to consider the negative effects of flooding the global economy with cheap money. The concept of eurobonds – an important possible way to fix European finance – is also dismissed without comment. But China’s lack of central banking independence is highlighted as an important counterweight to the Western approach: the government’s authoritarian control of monetary policy helped the Chinese economy snap back with barely a blip post-crisis.
…
If you like this, take a look at the history of the Medicis.
PBS has good series on them. You probably can find it on the web. Very interesting story.
For an example of excellent timing, check out the date on the article posted below.
If only the Plunge Protection Team had been there to supply liquidity to the Bitcoin market, the crash need never have happened!
The Logic Problems That Will Eventually Pop the Bitcoin Bubble
By Kurt Eichenwald
4:54 PM, April 9 2013
The one fundamental truism of investing, and the one most often ignored, is this: the higher the returns, the higher the risk.
The past is littered with examples of when that rule was ignored. The stocks of dot-com companies raced to stratospheric heights in the late 1990s, until they came crashing to the ground. After a decade of astonishing growth in value, junk bonds defaulted en masse in 1989. Values in the housing market zoomed for years, until they grew unsteady in 2006 and then collapsed in 2008. The bottom-line message of history is that, if you’re doubling and tripling your money in record time, you’re also more likely to lose it all.
Which brings us to the Bitcoin craze and what is almost certain to be the coming debacle.
For those who don’t know about Bitcoins, they are a brilliant technical concept designed to create a new, digital currency that essentially cuts out the middleman—values of Bitcoins are established online, peer to peer. There are no central banks, and at least for now, there is no government involvement. Like standard currency, Bitcoins can be traded or used for purchases, but only with those sellers who will accept them. Because it is a system independent of external meddling, there can be no sudden devaluation of Bitcoins through the actions of governments. (But make no mistake—there can be sudden devaluation of the currency through the actions of players in the Bitcoin market, and too many of them seem not to realize it. More on that below.) The values are not pegged to any existing currency; instead, members in the Bitcoin market establish the exchange rate through simple supply and demand—when the number of people wanting Bitcoins grows faster than the availability, the values go up.
…
The most interesting thing about Bitcoin is that it was created in response to the financial crisis of 2008 and a purposeful attempt to make a new currency that is not controllable by governments.
The gentle breezes of anarcho capitalism are occurring worldwide. I see this as a race between two competing pushes: one, a push by United Nations for a dictatorial world government and two, a push for freeing man from men. My bet is on the latter. But precious metals will reign as currency.
Once many competitor techno-anarcho currencies to Bitcoin spring up, Bitcoin will become virtually worthless, as it dawns on even the densest technogeek with the least economics education that the unlimited and unregulated supply of virtual currency can rapidly lead to competitive devaluation.
The techno-geek community seems overly fixated on the “slow-mining” process which governs Bitcoin creation, not recognizing that there is a potential for copy-cat Bitcoin currencies to spring up at any time.
Mark my word: By this time next year, there will be rival versions of Bitcoin in circulation…
I agree.
To take my point a step further, as you yourself might point out, gold has no close substitutes, while Bitcoin potentially has many close substitutes.
There really is no choice between gold and Bitcoin as a long-term store of value; if your interest is to engage in short-term bubble gambles, that is another matter entirely.
Litecoins is just one of the many digital currencies competing with Bitcoins.
So much for the false theory that the very slow mining process of Bitcoin will limit the supply of virtual currency in a manner to maintain its value.
Once many competitor techno-anarcho currencies to Bitcoin spring up, Bitcoin will become virtually worthless
I disagree, PB. The overproduction of some _other_ virtual currency does not undermine the value of Bitcoin in any way—it merely affects the exchange rate between the two. The posited other virtual currency will become worthless, not the Bitcoin.
This is identical to having only one central bank over-producing one single fiat currency. The result is that THAT currency become devalued, but it does not devalue all fiat currencies. Other currencies merely gain strength in the relative exchange rate between the two.
Read up on the economics of close substitutes and get back to us with a follow-up report.
P.S. Contrary to popular beliefs, there are fundamental and legal limits on how much fiat money can be created before serious problems ensue. Though the same fundamental issues face virtual currencies, the legal constraints are absent.
Read up on the economics of close substitutes and get back to us with a follow-up report.
A virtual currency that does not have the same guarantees against over-production is NOT a close substitute; thinking that it is is an error.
Contrary to popular beliefs, there are fundamental and legal limits on how much fiat money can be created before serious problems ensue.
Remind me of what the legal limit is on the production of fiat Federal Reserve Notes?
And can you please translate that into a maximum total number of dollars that will ever be produced—e.g. guaranteed never to be exceeded?
Assuming there is not a small army of techno-geeks strewn across the planet who could come up with alternative schemes to create currencies with built-in technical safeguards against over-production is an error. For a basic example, consider the fact that even the Fed has mulled over the idea of automating money growth in order to reduce or eliminate human discretion from the monetary policy equation. Note this would have the undesirable side effect of effectively taking away the guns which too-big-to-fail Megabanks can currently aim at the FOMC in order to extract bailouts.
“…a push for freeing man from men.”
A great ideal that will never be fully realized as the nature of mankind is the brutish enslavement of others if given half a chance.
All that can ever be done is to minimize it and stay vigilant.
The signers of the Declaration of Independence knew and understood this.
As for BItcoin, think Flooze or Beenz. Realpolitik is that money, no matter anyone’s opinion, is always backed the country’s military might that issues it.
Invest at your own, very real, risk.
…backed BY…
Isn’t it interesting how, even though Bitcoin is a “virtual currency,” the geek cult who trade in it felt the need to create a physical version of the coinage? Don’t they realize that if it exists in physical form, the government could potentially CONFISCATE IT?
And here is an even worse reason to for Bitcoin buyers to be afraid: Given the utter anonymity of Bitcoin transactions, there is no reason a central bank could not use a flood of fiat money to create a Bitcoin bubble, sucking in lots of wealth from the sidelines out of the pockets of geeks who think they will profit from the bubble. The central bank can be the first to sell, profiting handsomely off the premium sale price and leaving individual bubble speculators holding the bag on the price collapse. Like the vile Winklevii…
I note this is basically the Wall Street stock sales business model, appropriated by sovereign banks with massive financial fire power.
Bitcoin bust: Virtual currency in flash crash mode
Tulips, anyone? Late stage capitalism at its finest. Photo: AP
Friday, April 12, 2013 - Morning Market Maven by Terry Ponick
Mike Caldwell, a 35-year-old software engineer, looks over bitcoin tokens at his shop in Sandy, Utah. Caldwell mints physical versions of bitcoins, cranking out homemade tokens with codes protected by tamper-proof holographic seals. An actual coin is pictured above today’s article, although physical coins aren’t necessary in bitcoin transactions. (Credit: AP)
WASHINGTON, April 12, 2013 – Bitcoin, the hot, sort-of-but-not-exactly-new virtual currency seems to be going the way of oil and gold this morning: down. At last check this morning, a bitcoin was worth $60. Not bad, you say? No, not good. Just this past Wednesday, one bitcoin peaked out at $266 per coin before tanking, hitting a low of $120. Thursday, bitcoins endured a “trading halt” on one of its largest exchanges—known at “Mt. Gox”—that lasted for half a day. That didn’t stem the tide, though, as bitcoins have lost nearly 80% of their value in just two trading days. And we thought Apple options were volatile.
As a so-called virtual currency, a bitcoin is made up of digital bits and is allegedly based on cutting-edge mathematical algorithms meant to guard it against counterfeiting. Interestingly, it also appears to have been founded on an old idea, now dismissed by mainstream economists, about how a currency should operate—an idea that could be setting bitcoins up for an abrupt plunge.
Bitcoin was started in 2009 as a currency free from government controls, an entirely digital means of exchange for a digital age. It’s a rapidly growing phenomenon that has taken root as a payment method on some websites for both legal and illegal goods. The entire phenomenon seems to be a weird amalgamation of anarchism—born, in this case, due to an increasing distrust in some quarters of rapidly-debased fiat currencies like the dollar—and “Going Galt,” a process detailed in Ayn Rand’s controversial novel Atlas Shrugged, whereby an entrepreneurial genius goes underground in protest of increasing world socialism, taking the captains of productive capitalism with him in order to evade statist control.
On another level, though, bitcoins are the latest, techiest example of the 1960s’ energizing but ultimately failed hippie culture. In this case, however, it’s tech wienies and their philosophical soul mates who are using, effectively, a conjectural currency to do a John Galt on the system. On the other hand, you could probably argue that Ben Bernanke is doing the same thing via the Fed, although the Fed chair at least has a veneer of legitimacy to back up his efforts.
Yet bitcoins are also different from the “Federal Reserve Notes” we carry in our wallets and purses. They can be extraordinarily volatile for at least two key reasons, both of which we’ve seen this week.
Each bitcoin was typically worth less than $10 for most of the currency’s history. But this week the value surged past $200 - with the recent bailout crisis in Cyprus seen by many as one of the triggers of the surge. Wednesday saw a “flash crash,” as the value dipped close to $100 before recovering. Point one, then, is that this “currency” behaves more like a stock or a commodity than a so-called legitimate currency backed by a recognized government entity.
The meteoric rise and fall in bitcoin value this week is also linked to what some economists say is the biggest problem with the currency: that the supply of bitcoins increases only slowly, at a rate that’s coded into the system, which is our second point.
That’s a contrast to a regular paper currency like the dollar, whose supply is managed by a central bank like the Federal Reserve. The Fed engineers the dollar supply to increase slightly faster than the growth of the economy, which means that the value of the dollar falls slightly every year, in the phenomenon known as inflation.
…
Winklevoss twins amass huge Bitcoin haul as bubble bursts
Tyler, left, and Cameron Winklevoss are big supporters of digital currency Bitcoin. (Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times)
Your take?
Are Bitcoins a good investment?
Yes 21%
No 79%
By Andrea Chang
April 12, 2013, 12:48 p.m.
The Winklevii are back, and this time they’re not talking about Facebook.
Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss — the Harvard twins who have argued for years that Mark Zuckerberg stole the idea for Facebook from them — this week told the New York Times that they had massive holdings, at one point valued at $11 million, in virtual currency Bitcoin.
The public backing by two widely recognized players in the tech world, combined with Bitcoin’s soaring — and now crashing — value, has forced the secretive digital money into the spotlight.
Bitcoin is known as the world’s first decentralized digital currency and was created four years ago by someone (or possibly more than one person) known by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Owners can buy and sell the currency, transfer it to others via the Internet and use it to buy digital and physical goods (although that is still in the early stages).
Bitcoin has been of particular interest this month as the dollar value of the virtual currency skyrocketed from $25 just two months ago to $266 on Wednesday.
But since then, Bitcoin’s value has plummeted as the bubble burst for the highly speculative currency. The coins were trading for as low as $54.25 on Friday, meaning the Winklevii have taken a huge hit on their investment.
Then again, when the twins first bought into Bitcoin last summer, the dollar value of the digital currency was in the single digits. And, with their multimillion-dollar settlement with Facebook, they can certainly afford some ups and downs in the market.
Well this is the current argument about why owning gold is a bad idea. Central bankers pump and dump. The deal today is that international central bankers are competing with each other. The most solvent banks do not dump gold. The least solvent dump gold. Draghi told Cyprus to sell its gold.
The brave individuals on main street merely yawn and regularly buy precious metals bullion. Bitcoin is just a blip and will be replaced. Hard currency will survive. Someone can please use statistics to try and prove otherwise. Won’t happen. Not with the history of precious metals.
It is arrogant for gold detractors to announce the death of precious metals as currency.
I hope you aren’t suggesting I am one of the detractors who has announced the death of gold as currency, because if so, you are mistaken.
Gold will always be traded as long as there are humans around to trade it, though it will trade at much lower values once the panic premium deflates. And don’t take my word for it — no less than Goldman Sachs predicts further gold price erosion dead ahead.
If you learned nothing else by now from over more than half a decade of reading and posting here, you should have learned that bubbles and their denouement can play out over longer time horizons than the speculators who try to profit off them can remain in the game.
Exhibit A: The Japanese stock market, which so far has failed to recover from the early-1990s collapse after nearly a quarter of a century. The collapse phase at this point has approached if not exceeded a typical speculator’s effective investing lifetime.
Exhibit B: Gold prices peaked at over $800 an ounce in the early 1980s, then deflated to just north of $300 nominal over the next two decades, by around 2000, with much larger inflation-adjusted losses. Next the price rocketed up to $1890 an ounce by late 2011, in what had to have been one of the most rapid real asset price ascents in history, given relatively low inflation over the past decade. Whether the subsequent 20%+ correction will last or will flip into another decade of volatile appreciation remains to be seen, but the rate of ascent to the 2011 peak leaves me wondering whether this time is different. One thing seems certain: Once the current gold bubble pops, and the price dynamics revert to the slow leak pattern seen from 1980-2000, dollar cost averaging will not help except to slow the falling knife’s rate of descent compared to if you made a lump sum investment in gold up front.
I further see no reason our hapless landlords and other housing bubble speculators might not face a long, painful period of sustained losses, bolstered by a cargo cult faith that they might someday, somehow get back the money they blew when they bought a U.S. residential real estate investment at peak bubble price levels circa 2005.
Don’t look now, but Goldman Sachs just stuck a fork in this bubble.
Gold to be a lousy investment in the next decade
By Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar, TNN | 14 Apr, 2013, 03.34PM IST
The special reasons driving the gold boom of the last decade have gone. It’s time to sell gold, not buy.The special reasons driving the gold boom of the last decade have gone. It’s time to sell gold, not buy.
The Indian price of gold has risen six folds in the last decade, fueling a record speculative import spree. Soaring gold imports have hit $42 billion in the first ten months of 2012-13, pushing the current account deficit to near-disaster levels. The finance minister is wringing his hands in distress, while housewives say that buying gold was the best thing they ever did.
Sorry, but the party is over. The notion that gold is the finest investment, whose value can only go up, is dead wrong. History shows that gold fluctuates crazily, so it can look a fabulous investment for some time and then become a total disaster. There’s nothing safe about it.
The Indian price reached a peak of Rs 33,000 per 10gm in late 2011. It has since fallen steadily to just Rs 29,000. Global trends suggest we have entered an era of falling or stagnant gold prices. Housewives and all other buyers beware: gold will probably be a lousy investment in the next decade.
After the US went off the gold standard in 1971, gold shot up from $35/ounce to $835 in 1980. It looked the best investment in sight. But then its price crashed and stayed down till 2001, at around just $250/ounce. Gold investors lost their shirts (and sometimes underpants) for two decades.
However, after 2003 gold zoomed again. It reached a new peak of $1,890 in late 2011. But it has fallen steeply to just $1,501 last Friday. It may bounce back temporarily , but will then fall again.
The fall in price has been less dramatic in India because the rupee has depreciated against the dollar. Even so, gold in rupee terms is down 10% from its peak. Goldman Sachs estimates that the world price will fall sharply to $1,270 by the end of 2014, and other analysts are almost as gloomy.
Gold is a safe haven to which people rush in troubled times, so speculators hoped its price would rise in today’s troubled conditions. North Korea is threatening nuclear war and Japan seeks to double its money supply. Cyprus has set a dangerous precedent by confiscating uninsured large deposits in its top banks, and this could have prompted a rush into gold. Why, then, has gold fallen instead of rising?
First, fears of a Eurozone breakdown took gold to a peak in 2011, but those fears are mostly gone, so gold is less needed as a safe haven. Second, the US is finally set, after five years, to end its quantitative easing of money supply, reducing the monetary fuel of speculators.
These are troubled times. In the larger realm, although seeming simple, it is a struggle between individual liberty (spontaneous order) that erases borders on the one hand and world government (that also erases borders) that makes every human an equal serf.
Precious metals currency will win in a libertarian world. And we will get that.
“…that makes almost every human an equal serf.”
I’m trying to get my brain around the technical difference between Bitcoin and information age virtual Federal Reserve Notes. Some of the things I am reading are not much help:
“…bitcoins are the latest, techiest example of the 1960s’ energizing but ultimately failed hippie culture. In this case, however, it’s tech wienies and their philosophical soul mates who are using, effectively, a conjectural currency to do a John Galt on the system. On the other hand, you could probably argue that Ben Bernanke is doing the same thing via the Fed, although the Fed chair at least has a veneer of legitimacy to back up his efforts.
…”
The Washington Times, April 12, 2013
This 12 April 2013 Washington Times article is great on many levels:
Bitcoin should be called Ponzicoin.
What’s the technical difference between Bitcoin and virtual Federal Reserve Notes?
Federal reserve notes have a lot more guns…tanks…and nukes backing it.
Virtual Federal Reserve Notes can be produced without any limit, other than the political.
Bitcoin cannot be produced so easily—it requires the actual computation of a non-trivial math problem to create them. The key is that it is hard to compute or forge, but cheap and easy to verify.
Everyone understands how dollars work, but who understands Bitcoins? You can’t even find the information on Wikipedia.
One thing is for certain: This currency will not go very far if only a few geeks know how to trade in it, due to fundamental liquidity constraints on its use.
How Bitcoin works
Jump to: navigation, search
There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.
Bitcoins are not necessarily anonymous.
Forgot the link :
http://anonymity-in-bitcoin.blogspot.com/2011/07/bitcoin-is-not-anonymous.html
Exactly. And you can bet your last dollar that governments can and will figure out a way to tax them. I already described one potential informal tax above (central banks and other strong hands blowing Bitcoin bubbles to suck in unwitting weak handed speculators, then pulling the plug first to cash in on knifeholders’ losses).
Given the utter anonymity of Bitcoin transactions, there is no reason a central bank could not use a flood of fiat money to create a Bitcoin bubble, sucking in lots of wealth from the sidelines out of the pockets of geeks who think they will profit from the bubble.
Isn’t this true of every asset class—in other words, what you describe has absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin.
You are describing the fundamental nature of fiat currency.
False.
There are rules governing the relationship between fiat currencies and the value of goods and services they can purchase, which do not apply to Bitcoin. We can argue about how much these rules actually bind policy, but they definitely are definitely relevant to the comparison.
There are rules governing the relationship between fiat currencies and the value of goods and services they can purchase,
Huh? What rules?
I thought all of the rules about fiat currency and its value went out the window with QE, when the Fed began producing them at will out of thin air in order to bolster preferred asset classes.
Despite QE1, QE2 and QE3-to-infinity-and-beyond, inflation remains low. I know this is true because FOMC members say so.
Fed doves play down threat of U.S. inflation
The Federal Reserve Building stands in Washington April 3, 2012. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
By Jonathan Spicer and Alister Bull
Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:02pm EDT
(Reuters) - Federal Reserve policymakers went out of their way on Saturday to play down the risk that aggressive measures to bolster the U.S. economy would lead to inflation in the future, in a clear signal of support for its ongoing actions to spur growth.
The U.S. central bank last month maintained a controversial program of buying $85 billion of bonds a month, while pledging to keep interest rates near zero until unemployment hits at least 6.5 percent, so long as inflation stays under 2.5 percent.
Two of the central bank’s most dovish officials - Chicago Federal Reserve boss Charles Evans and Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota - pushed back against recent signals from Fed hawks who want to taper those bond purchases.
“Without signs of actual inflation, many inflation-risk discussions ultimately raise this specter of … unlocking the long-ago-vanquished inflation demons from the dungeon,” said Evans, a voting member of the Fed’s policy committee this year.
“We have to monitor it, we have to be mindful, but I don’t think we should obsess over it,” he told an event in Boston.
Minutes of the Fed’s March 19-20 meeting, released on Wednesday, indicated that “many” of its 19 policymakers thought the pace of bond buying could be slowed in coming months, provided the nation’s labor market continues to improve.
However, data released since that meeting showed disappointingly small U.S. job growth in March and an unemployment rate of 7.6 percent, which was actually down from 7.7 percent the month before but only because people gave up looking for work.
The Fed’s preferred inflation measure is around 1.3 percent, well below its 2 percent target.
Kocherlakota, like-minded and speaking alongside Evans, argued that a balanced policy approach would allow inflation to deviate somewhat from its official 2 percent inflation goal, in order to lower U.S. unemployment.
“A balanced approach would allow for deviations of inflation from its longer run goal in order to facilitate a faster decline in unemployment back to its desired level,” Kocherlakota said.
Kocherlakota is alone in advocating for even more accommodation from the Fed in the form of lowering to 5.5 percent, from 6.5 percent currently, the “threshold” at which the central bank will consider raising rates from near zero.
…
There is actually a body of research, some of it written by Federal Reserve Bank economists, on “Rules vrs Discretion,” which explain policy actions in terms of the costs of following the rules (”commitment costs”) or breaking them (”weasel costs”).
Should be required reading for married men, as many of the same principles which apply to central banking policy are also useful in the marriage arena.
Bitcoin is a joke. A scam. See my post above.
http://www.kitco.com/reports/KitcoNews20130412NC_2.html
Cyprus, sell your gold, said Draghi.
If they sell their gold, they are left with toilet paper. Supposedly this is the reason for the sell off Friday. Cyprus has no resources other than being a money laundering place. If their gold is gone and since they permanently chased away tax evaders their future is fuster clucked.
If the gold detractors are right, why is gold still held by central bankers?
Buying gold is getting to be more lucrative. I hope the price falls to $1300.
Perhaps Goldman Sachs is too gloomy in their dismal gold price forecast? Here is a sunnier one to buoy the hopes of those who believe gold is not yet through with its current runup.
That said, one should always be cautious about the dangers of short-term trend extrapolation, as future asset prices are fundamentally unpredictable.
Europe: Economy
Gold Prices Could Peak at $5,000: Bank of America
Published: Friday, 21 Sep 2012 | 12:36 PM ET
By: Katy Barnato
As gold prices hit a 2012 record of $1,787.40 per ounce on Friday, Bank of America Merrill Lynch analysts said the precious metal could soar to $3,000 or even $5,000 over the longer-term.
“We will be focusing in on gold. Ultimately we think gold can trade between $3,000 and $5,000 an ounce going forward,” MacNeil Curry, head of foreign-exchange and rates technical strategy at BAML, told CNBC’s “Worldwide Exchange.”
“Certainly not within the next few months, but on a long-term basis we are on a well-defined uptrend, and we have got more to run before that runs its course.”
Sabine Schels, senior director and head of fundamental commodity research at BAML, added: “The best long story for commodity markets right now is gold. In the type of aggressive monetary policy easing environment we have right now, post what the Fed has done with an open-ended QE, and what the ECB has done, you really want to be invested in gold.”
Schels forecast gold prices would reach $2,000 within six months, before rising to $2,400 by the end of 2014.
…
I still think gold prices will go to $3,000 per ounce in the next five years if the central bankers continue to do what they are doing now.
Rand Paul has little chance of winning in 2016. The majority of voters will vote for OPM.
Best to prep with “scary looking” guns, ammo, precious metals, and a red state residence.
In the long run, liberty will win. That will take at least ten years. Most Americans still choose to initiate force against each other through their agent: government.
In the long run, liberty will win.
You, my friend, are a seriously-deluded optimist.
My bet is that we will get more and more of the same things we have been getting in recent memory—e.g. less liberty.
So does this mean you happily initiate force? Or does it mean you are well aware your agents (politicians you vote for) I intimate force, but are still happy to vote for them?
Gah! Initiate!
So does this mean you happily initiate force?
Heck no, Bill—my guess would be that we vote fairly similarly.
I merely meant that I don’t share your sense of optimism regarding the future of liberty.
I view liberty as something that is always in flux. Here’s an analogy that just occurred to me: liberty is like leverage. Both fluctuate over time.
Leverage is at a low right after a Minsky moment, when the weak hands get flushed; it increases steadily over years of stability, eventually provoking that Minsky moment.
Liberty fluctuates similarly. It is at its highest immediately after a revolution, and then year after year it is slowly chiseled away, until the people cannot tolerate it any more and rise up in revolt.
“I still think gold prices will go to $3,000 per ounce in the next five years if the central bankers continue to do what they are doing now.”
That’s a reasonable conjecture, except for one potential problem: FOMC inflation hawks are already discussing the point when they will take away the punch bowl. Which might mean one of the following:
1) They really do plan to take away the punch bowl within the next few years, and are trying to soften the blow by openly warning the populace.
2) They are playing a fooling game, by creating the expectation for near-term punch bowl removal which they can later defuse in order to extract wealth out of those who believed them and went long into fixed dollar-denominated investments, as the dashing of these expectations through a “longer-than-expected” period of QE3 would naturally lead to another runup in risk-on assets (gold, stocks, etc) to the detriment of risk-off assets (savings accounts, Treasurys, money-market funds, etc).
3) They really do mean to stick to the plan of ending QE3 when unemployment drops far enough (6.5%), which introduces another wild card of uncertainty to the future of monetary policy.
Which door will it be, ladies and gents, number 1), number 2) or number 3)?
Financial Times of London
Last updated: April 10, 2013 10:03 pm
Fed leaks rate-setting minutes to banks
By Robin Harding in Washington and Tom Braithwaite and Stephen Foley in New York
The Federal Reserve leaked the minutes of its last rate-setting meeting to bank lobbyists as well as congressional aides and trade associations.
On Wednesday the Fed published its March minutes in the morning rather than the afternoon as had been scheduled. The central bank said it was doing so because they had already been accidentally released on Tuesday afternoon to a distribution list, comprising “mostly congressional staffers and trade association members in Washington”.
However, on Wednesday afternoon, the Fed published that list, which included lobbyists at Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup, among other banks.
Though the list was predominantly comprised of staffers to members of Congress, it also included a significant number of employees working for banks, opening the possibility that they could have passed on the information to traders.
Staff at Fifth Third, Barclays, Regions Financial, Wells Fargo, Citi, UBS, US Bancorp, Goldman, JPMorgan and PNC Financial all received the minutes early. Naomi Camper, one of JPMorgan’s top lobbyists, was among the recipients.
Two banks whose lobbyists received the email said they had found no evidence that the minutes had been distributed to other employees or used as a basis for trading.
The potential damage may have been limited by the fact that the minutes contained no explosive revelations. It showed participants were ready to slow the QE3 programme of asset purchases in the summer or early autumn. Weak payrolls data, however, may already have changed plans.
“Many” participants at the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee said continued labour market improvement should prompt a QE slowdown “at some point over the next several meetings”.
…
Which door will it be, ladies and gents, number 1), number 2) or number 3)?
My vote is on door number 2; they are talking down long-term inflation expectations, but will ease until they are absolutely forced to stop.
Unfortunately, though I love it not, I find door number 2 most likely. With a great big crash to follow when and if the door is ever slammed shut.
“If the gold detractors are right, why is gold still held by central bankers?”
Read my post above on the Cyprus bailout and get back to us.
Gold is still dropping, though I am a bit confused, as I thought it was down to $1476 already as of last Friday evening?
Gold - Electronic (COMEX) Jun 2013
$1,480.50
Change -20.90 -1.39%
Volume 30,901
Apr 14, 2013, 9:24 p.m.
Previous close $ 1,501.40
Day low $1,477
Day high $1,495
Open: 1,481.00
52 week low $1,476
52 week high $1,803
Spring Market Observation from suburban Boston. For sale inventory seems the same as past years. Low end (condos and houses under $400K not moving. Past few weeks lots of stuff on the market in the $750K - $500 range. And it seems to be selling quickly. But the newer listings of $750K look like what have been $450K - $500K houses. Honesty don’t know what they’re thinking. Lot’s of stuff $800K+ sitting. Many of the same houses have been for sale for the 3 years that I have lived here. This is western suburbs - Winchester, Arlington, Lincoln, Concord, Lexington, Waltham, etc… The housing stock is not great here in the sense that there have been very little added in the past 30 or 40 years. Maybe if you go way far out. Lots of the stuff is junk. Surprises the junk people buy bubble or no bubble. You can rent very nice apartments for reasonable amounts.
And here is a data point from suburban San Diego:
A mold-infested house in our vicinity went on the market just over a month ago at $550K, versus the Zestimate™ of $465K, which I am guessing fails to reflect the anecdotal reports on the mold situation which passed through the neighborhood grapevine. It is a comp to the place we rent, for which our LLs paid $565K near the bubble peak in 2004. Since listing it, they dropped the price to around $540K a couple of weeks ago, then again to under $520K just last week.
Apparently, despite the red hot market here in San Diego, all these price discounts have failed to spark a bid war on this property.
Flash forward to yesterday: The listing history says the home was delisted, then listed again on the same day at the same price (still just a little below $520K, and way north of the Zestimate™). Why bother delisting only to list again at the same price?
Would the Realtors™ possibly assume there are buyers out there who are too dumb to figure out that in a Dutch auction sale, one can most likely get a more attractive price by simply waiting until the sellers drop it again?
Happy April the 15th One Day Early
Folks, for those that are filing today and tomorrow, isn’t it grand to finally get the taxes done. Thank God the higher taxes for the rich didn’t affect me.
Oh wait, I got hosed again.
It’s still better to be wealthy and pay higher taxes than to be poor and pay none. The simple arithmetic speaks for itself…
That is what one of my financial advisors told me yesterday in Phoenix. Okaaaaaaaay.
Just signed our tax forms — ouch!
BTW, I hate comments like that…they takes nothing else into consideration: Investment of capital into business, investment of time and $ into education, current investment of time into work, willingness to take risk, investment of years working NOT making as much prior to making it to peak earning years, etc.
Clearly it’s better to have a good lifestyle as compared to sleeping in a box.
However, what’s better? A government desk job making $75k per year? Or working as an attorney making $120k per year?
Consider pension (or lack thereof), cost of education, current vacation days, hours worked per week, etc.
The answer is not always clear based on income alone.
Thank you for improving on my post, Captain Obvious.
P.S. If you don’t mind waiting in line, you can get free food at Carmel Mountain Chick-fil-A tomorrow to assuage the pain of paying taxes. Unless you are too broke after paying your taxes to afford the cash outlay…
i just dont get that. you wait in line 2 hrs for a 4.00 sandwich? How much is your time worth?
I’m going to check out how long the line is just before dinner time…and bring along reading material as a hedge (the time is not wasted if you are doing something you would have to do anyway…).
After paying our taxes this year, I am in somewhat of a penny-pinching mood…
bring your ipad and blog about bubbles.
Taxation eve. Tomorrow for me will be the real “poof” as I allowed access to a bank account to pay the taxes. Poof goes one half of my cash savings.
My California colleagues tell me what Whac says. Be happy you are in a high tax bracket. It means you are able to have a high standard of living. Well maybe yes. In England in the 60s the maximum tax rate was 95%, which prompted The Beatles to write “Taxman.” “One for you nineteen for me…”
The Beatles must have had lousy tax advisors.
Did mine a month ago.
Need to go on extension…don’t have all the K-1s yet. With final payment for 2012, and first estimate for 2013…big ouch. I told my wife the final tally for 2012, and she is now officially a Republican. I’ll leave out the more colorful language related to people who say we aren’t paying our “fair share”.
“I told my wife the final tally for 2012, and she is now officially a Republican.”
Hah!
After signing off on our taxes, I suggested to my wife that we need to find a good accountant to avoid paying so much going forward.
High Street bakery Greggs has been slimming down its food - while still pushing up the prices.
Several of the store’s best-selling savouries, including steak bakes, bacon rolls and pizzas have shrunk in size.
But the bakery giant has defended the shrinking size of its food, saying it is better on the waistline.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308843/Who-shrank-pies-Bakery-giant-Greggs-slims-pasties-bacon-rolls-pushing-prices.html#comments
Perhaps we shouldn’t fear the obesity epidemic as much
The steak bake now has 20% less horse meat.
What’s really going on in California
California imposed a new law on banks innocuously called “Homeowners Bill of Rights” which forces banks to switch over to a judicial foreclosure process, which they can opt to do on their own, but takes a year or more to renegotiate contracts and compensation structures for the foreclosure law firms who do all the leg work for the banks. And while those changes are being made… it makes it appear that foreclosures have slowed down dramatically in the state.
The reality?
Defaults (undeclared) are spiraling upward that yet have to pass through the foreclosure pipeline.
The truth?
California is still the highest foreclosure state in sheer volume and percentage.
The low-down?
Resale housing in California is still massively overpriced as a result of unprecedented interference by individual states and the federal government. The market distortions will be removed and the down draft will continue allowing the market to correct.
With millions of excess empty houses and housing demand at 17 year lows, housing prices have a long way to fall. A very long way to fall.
If you’re paying more than $55-60 per square foot for a resale house, you’re paying far too much.
ALWAYS perform a per square foot estimate of the value of a house and NEVER entrust anyone else to do it for you. The Real Estate Machine will do and say anything to keep you from performing this analysis.
Suppose you had four choices of how to allocate your savings:
1) Put all your money into gold.
2) Put all your money into Bitcoin.
3) Put all your money into a dollar-denominated passbook savings account.
4) Put all your money into U.S. residential real estate investments.
Which is most likely to prove to be a money-losing strategy through the lens of the rear-view mirror?
P.S. I already realize that strategy 4) is guaranteed to loose you alot of money — ALOT!
I agree though. Strategy 4 is a fools game. We still have a cultural war. In the 1960s my family would leave the house unlocked. Many others too, in a town near Yosemite Park. Neighborhoods kept their characters until Nixon’s Section 8. CRA made irresponsible people get into SFH neighborhoods.
70% of neighborhoods in the USA are now ghettos. Why not burn your money instead of own RE? At least you will be mobile.
Small towns have been ghettoized by the invasion of meth labs. I suspect that most of them are not due to Section 8.
Hard to say, as Section 8 renters may have more free cash available to pay for meth than those who don’t qualify for a rental subsidy.
The Billboards will soon go up: SECTION OCHO, SI! brought to you by Blackrock.
I think this is the explanation for a lot of the institutional investors. They know that they can’t do worse than a Section 8 payment for rental income and theres getting resdy to be between 10 and 20 million who will now qualify. How much do you need to pay for the house to make the $1200 a month Section 8 payment cash flow you positive?
I generally leave my door unlocked, except when I go to bed or go to work.
Why must anyone have to be 100% invested in any asset class? Did I miss seeing the gun against my head?
Strategy for me: 60/30/10 ratio stocks/government securities/precious metals.
Strategy for us: Play Caesar’s game in the front, do what we gotta do in the back.
Hey, Sloth was talking about tapping feet in men’s room stalls. What the hell does that mean?
I think it’s some LBGT code language he and his LBGT friends use.
l saw two of them one time
just kissing away.
Two males. Think of it!
What should we do with them?
l don’t know, but l don’t think
they’ll make the parish line.
They got fancy bikes.
That’s some Yankee queers!
Check the flag on that bike!
lt sure is.
l still say they’re not going to
make the parish line.
-from Easy Rider- Pimple’s and Jethro’s compadres in the coffee shop.
I take offense to that.
‘-from Easy Rider-’
This is rich. The warmonger, racist, pro-drone murder poster, pro-government anything, invoking 60’s issues. Maybe you remember the guys in Easy Rider were making a few bucks smuggling cocaine. What has our wonderful government war on drugs given us? We have gangs in Mexico cutting peoples heads off on youtube. There are something like 60-100,000 dead in Mexico in the last few years, as the US paid Mexico to go militant. And Obama, your hero, supported a coup against the leader of Honduras and now we are running death squads down there. Sounds real free MAN!
What a joke; a fascist, war loving, brutal state solution to everything poster quoting Easy Rider. The Brotherhood of Man indeed.
‘What could be more destructive to the cherished freedoms that make America a “shining city on a hill” than giving a “high level official” the power to kill Americans on US soil without any due process, accountability or transparency? What could be more Orwellian than asserting such dictatorial authority, which has always been the hallmark of totalitarian states, in the name of protecting the public’s safety? The cost of war is not measured solely in terms of blood and treasure. War also corrodes human morality to a point where even the most inhumane acts become perfectly acceptable. In fact, summary executions without due process and the right to a fair trial served as one of the justifications for removing Saddam Hussein’s regime.’
‘Not only does the recent Department of Justice White Paper resoundingly affirm this power grab, it also destroys the foundation of Anglo-American jurisprudence by nullifying the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ It eviscerates the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits any deprivation of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” It obliterates the protections afforded by the Sixth Amendment, including the “right to a speedy and public trial,” by asserting that government allegations alone, based on secret evidence, are sufficient to establish guilt. Accusation is guilt, Winston. As Glenn Greenwald cogently observes:’
“But of course, when this memo refers to “a Senior Operational Leader of al-Qaida”, what it actually means is this: someone whom the President – in total secrecy and with no due process – has accused of being that. Indeed, the memo itself makes this clear, as it baldly states that presidential assassinations are justified when “an informed, high-level official of the US government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the US.’
‘This is the crucial point: the memo isn’t justifying the due-process-free execution of senior al-Qaida leaders who pose an imminent threat to the US. It is justifying the due-process-free execution of people secretly accused by the president and his underlings, with no due process, of being that.”
‘Rarely do apologists for the normalization of extra-judicial murder realize that this represents a permanent erosion of core liberties, an ever-lasting debasement of the Bill of Rights. “We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it,” Orwell said. “Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.”
‘Orwell explained doublethink as “holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them…To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed…”
http://original.antiwar.com/faisal-moghul/2013/04/12/the-orwellian-paradigm/
I still say they’re not going to make the parish line.
:kisses:
To me a key message of Easy Rider was what the state’s rights boys ( the rednecks at the coffee shop, shocked to see an American flag on his bike) did to Capt America.
That’s why I’m leery of state’s rights. That scene rang true. Still does today.
You win the prize. (I thought about including a diversification choice on my list of alternatives, but then I wondered if somebody would suggest it if I omitted it…)
Money-losing, probably bit-coin.
Best thing to invest in is probably weaponry and survival stuff. Guns, ammo, crossbows, good tools, sun ovens, metal wheels, and the like.
“Money-losing, probably bit-coin.”
Before or after the 80% crash between last Wednesday-Friday?
I note that U.S. real estate crashed by a far smaller amount, so far, then started going up again. What makes you think Bitcoin won’t recover?
If you had to choose one as a long-term store of value, it would have to be gold, as the others will naturally steadily erode in value through time.
That said, there is a risk that gold is overpriced today, reflecting its superiority as a long-term store of value, and may not recover to recent price levels for decades to come…
if you own physical gold does it:
pay a dividend?
is there an opportunity for the gold to pay down the principal you invested to acquire that gold before you were to sell it?
what are the taxes on your gold sale?
can you use leverage to acquire that physical gold?
True: if you buy “today” which means tomorrow when most coin shops are open. But if you buy the same $ amount periodically why worry about what you paid for on a certain day? I have a few ounces I bought at $1780 spot. I have a few ounces I bought at $450 spot per ounce.
I agree with you unless gold has perchance entered a long-term slide, similar to between 1980-2000 or like the Japanese stock and real estate markets from 1990-2013, in which cases I disagree…
Of course, the problem is that you can only know when you are viewing a collapsed bubble through the lens of the rear-view mirror.
Housing demand has collapsed in the SF bay area. Down a whopping nominal 40% YoY and still falling.
http://picpaste.com/pics/10e645f823dc582e3f40990262beae01.1365961377.png
Washington DC rental rates down YoY,QoQ and MoM…. And still falling
http://picpaste.com/pics/70136eebddf41bfa4aa4cbdec120e110.1365961908.png
Why pay massively inflated prices for housing in the DC area when you can rent for half the monthly cost?
Shoeshine boy sell signal noted in today’s Parade Magazine cover story:
Living
Navigate the New Rules of Real Estate
April 13, 2013 – 6:00 AM
Kate Rockwood
By Kate Rockwood
Joe Zeff Design
After taking a beating during the Great Recession, the housing market is finally staggering back to its feet—but millions of Americans are wondering: Is it safe to get back in the real estate game?
“It made so much sense at the time,” says Maura C. of the Chicago condo she and her husband purchased in 2009.
The 30-something couple—motivated in part by the $8,000 federal tax credit for first-time homeowners—decided to buy the $310,000 two-bedroom unit shortly after their wedding.
“I’d been a renter for more than a decade,” Maura says, “but I never doubted that I would eventually own. In my mind, it was an integral part of building a future for myself and my family.”
Fast-forward four years and their apartment is underwater. A neighboring unit went through a short sale last summer, going for just $220,000, and another condo in the building is on the market for $243,000.
Now pregnant with her second child, Maura wants to eat the loss and buy a larger home. “Prices are starting to come back up, and interest rates are so low. If we wait to get above water, we’ll miss our chance,” she says.
But first, Maura has to convince her husband, Paul. “He feels trapped by the whole situation,” she says. “For him, renting would mean regaining our freedom and flexibility. But I grew up dreaming of having a ‘forever home.’ I just can’t let go of that idea.”
Maura and Paul are not alone. As statistics hint at a budding housing recovery, millions are struggling with the same questions. Is it time to get back in the game? Can we trust the market again? And perhaps the most difficult question of all: Is owning a home still the right dream?
…
Most people are trapped in their own minds.
If she keeps working toward her dreams, her home will be a forever slum, with cRAP music blaring next door, stabbings down the street, crack moms across the street, domestic violence and sexual predators all over. Welcome to post section 8. Housing, the new depreciating asset for most American nabes. Ghetto, our new culture.
“But first, Maura has to convince her husband, Paul. “He feels trapped by the whole situation,”
Cue the Suzanne ad. Yikes.
I not going to do the research but you can bet she’s lying about “it made so much sense at the time.” This is coming from someone who says “…But I grew up dreaming of having a ‘forever home.’ I just can’t let go of that idea.”
What it means is the nesting instinct got the better of good judgment and now wants to yield to it again. Poor Paul. But then he married her and decided to put up with her nonsense.
It amazes me the price some guys will pay for the certainty of female companionship.
But first, Maura has to convince her husband, Paul. “He feels trapped by the whole situation,” she says. “For him, renting would mean regaining our freedom and flexibility. But I grew up dreaming of having a ‘forever home.’ I just can’t let go of that idea.”
Paul needs to grow a pair.
The part of the story which left me confused was the wife’s musings about whether it is time to just “eat the loss” of $90,000 and move into a bigger place. Is it that hard to tell when you got stucco?
just “eat the loss”
“Just eating the loss” might be a euphemism for buy-and-bail… which is actually the rational thing for them to do in their situation.
After having read through most of this real estate fluffer piece, I have a burning question: How much does the NAR pay MSM outlets to publish their tripe?
What could possibly go wrong with pumping $40 bn a month into mortgage backed securities purchase, then loaning out the proceed to help needy people buy homes?
Neediest Homebuyers in U.S. Lifted by Japan: Mortgages
By Jody Shenn - Apr 14, 2013 10:00 AM PT
U.S. homebuyers are getting an unexpected boost from the Bank of Japan.
As Governor Haruhiko Kuroda’s efforts to spark inflation by doubling the central bank’s bond purchases shrinks the available debt in his country, traders are betting that will bolster demand for U.S-owned Ginnie Mae’s mortgage securities, pushing up prices and lowering yields that guide home-loan rates.
Japanese investors venturing into the U.S. home-loan market typically favor debt from Ginnie Mae, which helps finance borrowers with down payments as low as 3.5 percent, because it carries an explicit government guarantee, unlike Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac notes. Bond buyers from the Asian nation that has suffered three recessions in five years may increase their Ginnie Mae holdings by $50 billion annually as a result of the BoJ’s easing, Nomura Securities International estimates.
“It’s amazing to see the spillover effects of different central bank actions,” said Greg Reiter, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based head of residential mortgage research at the securities arm of Wells Fargo & Co., the largest U.S. home lender. “It could be quite stimulative to the U.S. economy by keeping mortgage rates low and assisting the Fed.”
Potential demand for Ginnie Mae securities from Japanese investors such as banks and insurers comes at an opportune time. The rebounding U.S. housing market has entered its most-active season and Federal Reserve officials signal they’re considering scaling back their own debt buying, which adds $40 billion of U.S. mortgage bonds a month to the Fed’s holdings.
…
“motivated in part by the $8,000 federal tax credit”
SUCKER! lol
And the best part about it….. even with the “tax credit”, they’re still underwater.
Posted: 10:00 p.m. Saturday, April 13, 2013
Post Special Report Wall Street buys up Main Street
New kid on the block:corporate titans
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Palm Beach County real estate investor Chip Bryan added 35 homes to his expanding cache in the first 60 days of the year. Backed by a private equity fund, he’s in buy, hold and rent mode. And he’s in a hurry.
Bryan’s competition is America’s financial masterminds, corporate behemoths who have set their sights on Florida as Wall Street buys up Main Street.
Another twist in the nation’s evolving housing market has hedge funds and multi-billion dollar companies becoming the landlords of the future, snapping up discounted single-family homes to rent out as they’ve done in the past with commercial properties and multi-family apartments.
It’s been just a year since a spontaneous comment by billionaire Warren Buffett ignited the corporate world’s home-buying spree. But already the New York-based Blackstone Group has 20,000 homes nationwide, including 4,000 in Florida.
Canada’s Tricon Capital, working with Lake Success Rentals, claims a bounty of 1,500 homes in South Florida and North Carolina. Colony Capital, based in Santa Monica, Calif., just announced its intention to buy 1,000 South Florida homes with a $2 billion nationwide investment.
One of the more aggressive buyers in South Florida is the Connecticut-based Starwood Property Trust. Despite having “no news to share” when contacted by The Palm Beach Post for this story, the company has picked up more than 80 Palm Beach County homes at foreclosure auction since it began buying in late November.
“This business used to be a subculture of deal makers and opportunists, mostly Realtors and contractors,” said Bryan, managing partner of Boca Raton-based Rebound Residential. “Then Wall Street arrived.”
Don’t be late on rent
The rapid-fire acquisitions are driven by a murky shelf life. Climbing home prices eat into profit, meaning a tipping point will arrive when the buy-hold-rent business model no longer makes sense. And unlike the mom and pop landlords of lore who may let a rent check slip in late now and then, corporations are all about the bottom line.
During a Starwood Property earnings conference call in February, one executive likened buying homes to trawling for tuna. You catch a lot of fish, keep the tuna, and throw everything else back in the ocean.
In late February 2012, Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Buffett sat in a director’s chair on CNBC’s Squawk Box and said if he had a way of managing them, he would buy “a couple hundred thousand single family homes.”
$37 million in this county
By April, the Blackstone Group was in the single-family landlord business, investing $3.8 billion nationwide. Blackstone created the new housing firm Invitation Homes to market and manage the rentals, buying heavily on Florida’s west coast with at least 700 homes in Hillsborough County, according to property appraiser records. Its South Florida purchases include about 150 homes in Palm Beach County, which cost a combined $37 million, according to the property appraiser’s office. Blackstone has another 500 homes in Broward and Miami-Dade counties.
‘Sweet spot’ price
Tricon Capital Group announced its partnership with Lake Success in July 2012 as part of an aggressive push to buy more distressed real estate. The basic business plan, said Lake Success co-founder Barry Bergman, is to buy homes at a “sweet spot” of between $75,000 and $150,000, spend an average of $15,000 on repairs, and rent them out until housing prices increase enough that it makes sense to sell. Lake Success has spent about $19.6 million in Palm Beach County for 140 homes.
“If the market changes and home prices go crazy, then maybe we’ll sell them in five to 10 years,” said Bergman, whose firm buys at auction and through bulk sales of distressed homes. “But we think there is a long term paradigm shift in the affordability of people to own homes. There is a definite portion of this population who will be renters for a while and want to rent in nice communities.”
Bryan, of Rebound Residential, said his company puts between $10,000 and $25,000 into remodeling a home before renting it out.
The clean-up job at a home on Cam Lee Road in suburban West Palm Beach wasn’t even finished before potential renters started calling. The house is on a cul-de-sac with three bedrooms, two bathrooms, a big backyard and wood flooring. The company paid $80,100 for the home in February through a short sale. The previous owner bought in 2006 for $250,000.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/business/new-kid-on-the-blockcorporate-titans/nXLFt/ - -
“buy homes at a “sweet spot” of between $75,000 and $150,000″
“portion of this population who will be renters for a while and want to rent in nice communities”
It’s a brilliant plan, only requires changing between 10 and 20 million’s legal status from illegal to legal to allow the Section 8 qualification. Then it’s virtually risk free! Been wondering why the reform seems to be much more of a fait accompli this time.
And before anyone gets their panties in a bunch, I agree we need to make them legal. But we’re going to do it Obamacare style without considering the consequences.
“…if he had a way of managing them,…” key words that many of you have noted before.
“Post Special Report Wall Street buys up Main Street”
With hundreds of billions (or was it trillions) in low-interest loans from the Fed to Megabank, Inc during the Fall 2008 financial crisis bailout, NOBODY COULD HAVE SEEN IT COMING!!!!
“Bryan’s competition is America’s financial masterminds, corporate behemoths who have set their sights on Florida as Wall Street buys up Main Street.”
I pity any individual U.S. householder who is dumb enough to go head-to-head with Wall Street’s Masters of the Universe in competition for U.S. single-family homes as investments. You are going to loose alot of money — ALOT!
PERSONAL FINANCE
April 14, 2013
Limited Relief in Foreclosure Pact
The vast majority of borrowers being compensated for mortgage-related abuses will get $1,000 or less apiece.
About four million borrowers will share $3.6 billion in cash as part of a settlement between federal regulators and banks accused of foreclosure-processing mistakes. U.S. regulators said last week that banks wrongfully took away homes from 1,082 borrowers who were members of the U.S. military. Another 53 borrowers were found to have lost their homes despite not actually defaulting on their loans. Those 1,135 individuals will receive checks of $125,000.
Most borrowers will see far less, with about 80% receiving checks ranging from $300 to $1,000, according to data released by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve.
…
How large is the Fed’s propaganda budget?
Primer on Nontraditional Monetary Policy Tools: The Maturity Extension Program
During the recent financial crisis, the Federal Reserve initially employed its traditional monetary policy tools, bringing the federal funds rate target rate down to practically zero by the end of 2008. But once they reached the zero bound, they could not push the rate any lower. The Fed then turned to some less traditional types of tools, including maturity extension and the purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS), to improve economic growth and the labor market. Since most textbooks have not yet caught up with these policy instruments, we offer a “plain English primer on the art and science of the Fed’s recent policy actions, with discussion questions that you can use with your students.
What policy actions did the Fed take recently?
In September 2011, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced a $400-billion program to sell, or redeem, short-term Treasury securities and purchase longer term securities with the proceeds. The FOMC later extended this program—officially called a maturity extension program, or MEP, and unofficially known as “Operation Twist”—through the end of 2012.
In September 2012, the Fed increased its accommodative monetary policy stance by increasing its purchases of agency MBS by $40 billion per month while continuing to reinvest the principal payments from existing securities and agency debt holdings into agency MBS. (Agency securities are guaranteed by government-sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.) The FOMC renewed these programs in December, directing the Trading Desk at the New York Fed to purchase $45 billion in longer-term Treasury securities per month and to extend the $40 billion monthly purchase of agency MBS and reinvestment of principal payments. They also announced that in January, the Fed’s maturing Treasury securities would be rolled over into new issue at auction and that it would continue its accommodation until the economic recovery is on solid footing and economic conditions warrant a change in direction.
…
“Since most textbooks have not yet caught up with these policy instruments…”
Textbooks? What about the law? Has the law caught up with them yet?
The attorney for the man accused of murdering Trayvon Martin wants details about a wrongful-death settlement — which could have paid $1 million or more — given to the late teen’s parents.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/11/attorney-wants-details-of-trayvon-wrongful-death-suit/2075759/
Cramdowns are coming.
POLITICS
April 12, 2013, 8:03 p.m. ET
Economist Eyed for Fannie Watchdog
By NICK TIMIRAOS
Mark Zandi, a prominent economist, has emerged as a leading candidate to head the regulator of mortgage-finance companies Fannie Mae (FNMA -2.80%) and Freddie Mac (FMCC -4.13%) amid signs that he would likely attract support from Senate Republicans, according to people familiar with the matter.
The White House hasn’t yet decided who to nominate as the next director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, a position it has struggled to fill. Along with Mr. Zandi, the Obama administration has also been considering Rep. Mel Watt, a North Carolina Democrat.
…
The FHFA’s current director, Edward DeMarco, took the job four years ago in an acting capacity after his predecessor left for the private sector. Mr. DeMarco has at times clashed with the Obama administration over homeowner aid, and left-leaning groups have campaigned to replace him. The agency, created five years ago, has never had its own director confirmed by the Senate because of Republican opposition to an earlier nomination.
Mr. Zandi has attracted attention, in part, because he may have a good chance at winning Senate confirmation. Senate Republicans have largely supported Mr. DeMarco and are expected to scrutinize his successor closely. But Mr. Zandi may placate these critics.
Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.), who serves on the Senate Banking Committee, said in a written statement Friday: “If Mark Zandi and the administration have an acceptable plan to transition us away from our dependence on [Fannie and Freddie], I’m optimistic that he could do a good job helping our country effectively execute that plan while also protecting the taxpayer.”
On housing, Mr. Zandi has published a paper outlining the need for a continued government role in backstopping the home-loan market.
While he has sometimes advocated more government intervention to address the foreclosure crisis, he has also called for scaling back the mortgage-interest deduction and the government’s role in the mortgage market once the current crisis has abated.
Replacing Mr. DeMarco could give the administration greater latitude to expand initiatives to help homeowners facing foreclosure and to mediate disputes over when banks should be forced to “buy back” defaulted mortgages, which some policy makers fret has kept credit standards too tight. But people familiar with the process have said that the Obama administration’s push to fill the FHFA position has less to do with specific policy flare-ups and more to do with its desire to have a permanent director oversee the process of overhauling Fannie and Freddie.
Without clear direction from the White House or Congress, Mr. DeMarco has begun to move more aggressively to shrink the firms’ heavy presence in the mortgage market. Last month, he announced plans to merge some of the firms’ back-office operations into a separate company that, for now, would be jointly owned by Fannie and Freddie.
…
“Mr. DeMarco has at times clashed with the Obama administration over homeowner aid,”
If you put Gatorade and homeowner aid together you would get…….
Shop online for Sports Nutrition, Homeownerade items, health and wellness … It starts with Homeownerade Prime 01, which provides pre-workout or pre-foreclosure fuel …. Adding too much or too little water to the mix will adversely affect Homeownerade effectiveness. …. the Obama administration suggested to Mr. DeMarco that he use Homeownerade to …
If it mentioned anywhere in that article that the principle reductions that Democrats want the FHFA to approve would, in many cases, amount to handouts valued at north of $100K for many underwater borrowers and much more for many underwater borrowers in California, then I must have missed it.
I also never saw an MSM article which estimated the value of underwater refis offered through the GSEs, which I am quite sure are also worth six figures in many instances. None of these hard data on wealth transfers to homeowners ever cloud the happy talk about how much help homeowners are getting these days.
I’m certain Mark Zandi will give a full accounting of such costs of GSE programs to the taxpayers, when and if he becomes head of FHFA…
“It does not require a majority to prevail,
but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.”
–Samuel Adams - Leader in our Fight for Independence
WILDLANDS PROJECT: Incredible, Outrageous and a Very Real Danger
Most Americans are completely unaware of the true nature of the threat from radical environmentalists. Although many of our countrymen are in a deep coma while others are pre-occupied with satisfying their appetites, we cling to the hope that there are enough good-intentioned but misinformed Americans who would join us in rescuing our way of life if they knew the truth. If you have any doubt that the green Fascists are undemocratic, elitist, socialist anti-Americans who despise humanity while worshipping “Mother Earth”, the rocks, the shrubs, the rodents and the grubs, we invite you to learn the truth from their own mouths, publications and websites.
The mission statement of the Wildlands Project states that “…we live for the day when Grizzlies in Chihuahua have an unbroken connection to Grizzlies in Alaska; when Gray Wolf populations are continuous from New Mexico to Greenland; when vast unbroken forests and flowing plains again thrive and support pre-Columbian populations of plants and animals;…” This sounds warm and fuzzy but what would it mean for the humans in the area?
Davis says about the Wildlands Project publication, “Wild Earth exists in part to remind conservationists that in the long run all lands and waters should be left to the whims of Nature.” Davis says that serious conservationists cannot accept development for human needs which he calls “sacrifice zones”. Davis prophesies the complete and final demise of human civilization when he states that, “the premise that we ought to save the full range of biodiversity leads logically to the conclusion that humanizing of landscapes must stop now and be reversed.” By “full range” Davis means the natural bios as it existed in Pre-Columbian America. This is the premise that most environmental groups are committed to.
Davis concludes his harangue with this revealing statement: “Does all the foregoing mean that Wild Earth and The Wildlands Project advocate the end of industrial civilization? Most assuredly. Everything civilized must go.”
Davis unwittingly reveals the dirty secret about the public face these groups put on to elicit public support for their radical view of the future. “..no one need advocate dismantling industrial civilization in order to join with The Wildlands Project. One need only favor the perpetuation of the full range of biodiversity and natural processes. (If you like bears, eagles, scurfpeas, and pearly mussels, join.)”, he says. Join even though you don’t support the outcome we have planned for you. Join and add your voice to ours and let us worry about the future. Join because you have warm, fuzzy feelings about wild creatures and leave the driving to us.
Dr. Reed Noss who is associated with the Wildlands Project as well as the University of Oregon and other radical environmental groups describes the corridor that would be needed to assure viability of the grizzly bear in Montana. “If the population of grizzlies in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem is to be connected to other populations, which seems to be necessary to assure population viability, then wide corridors with resident grizzlies must connect Yellowstone with the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (about 200 miles away) and the wildlands of central Idaho. …corridor for grizzly bears should be at least 44.25 km (27.5 miles) wide.” In further describing the corridor, he states, “Because Road densities above about 0.5 miles of road per square mile of habitat may be a threat to grizzlies (Bader 1991), road closures would be required to make inter-regional corridors safe .”
The proposed corridor would have to run somewhere between the southern end of the Scapegoat Wilderness north of Lincoln, Mt to Yellowstone Park south of Bozeman. It would cross hundreds of roads not to mention pipelines and large regional power lines and thousands of acres of private land. If these people have there way, do you think they would allow I-90 to run slam through the middle of their grizzly bear corridor? Of course not. It would either be closed and torn up for the width of the corridor plus a buffer zone on each side as would most of the rest of the roads in the area or it would tunnel under the entire width of the corridor. East- west travel would be restricted to one or two narrow, dangerous slow speed roads with no services. This would be the best we could hope for since even high altitude overflight of these areas is considered harmful.
What the radical environmentalists of the Wildlands Project want are ” Vast landscapes without roads, dams, motorized vehicles, powerlines, overflights, or other artifacts of civilization..” Noss, who is generally more restrained than Davis states the goal thus: “I suggest that at least half of the land area of the 48 conterminous states should be encompassed in core reserves and inner corridor zones (essentially extensions of core reserves) within the next few decades.” Core reserves equals wilderness.
Typical environmentalist that he is, Noss is not satisfied with half as we find out further on in this article. “I would offer a more ambitious long-term goal, pending human population reduction, that at least 95 percent of a region be managed as wilderness and surrounding multiple-use wildlands.” Of course Noss envisions himself and his colleagues roaming the 95% in some scientific/management capacity. They would set themselves up as kings of the forest with all the wealth and authority of the federal government at their command. The rest of us will be forcibly confined in the remaining 5%. Thankfully, there will be fewer of us to share that urban desert of poverty, crime and hopelessness. The loggers have already been told by government officials and radical environmentalists alike that they must adapt to the new social realities. Sooner or later we all follow that road if these people win this battle.
Don’t think that Dr. Noss is some lightweight, hemp smoking, tree hugger whose opinion can be easily dismissed. He has a Ph.D. in Wildlife Ecology, a long list of awards and professional appointments to boards and committees. He has written hundreds of articles and books. Noss has worked as a naturalist/conservation biologist for 28 years for various universities, federal and state agencies, including the EPA, and environmental groups. These credentials don’t make him right - just respected. We don’t dare turn over control of our lives to educated fools no matter how many degrees they may have.
But that is exactly what we will do if we let Noss and his colleagues set the agenda for this century.
Wildlands Project - Montanans For Multiple Use
http://www.mtmultipleuse.org/wildlands_project.htm - 22k -
You notice they never want to bring back the pristine ecosystem of the NYC or SF areas. For Wyoming people wolf reintroduction has sucked just like they knew it would. These folks don’t care. So be it. I just get annoyed when the next tactic is to make fun of the way people vote when there are perfectly rational reasons for it, such as this.
http://www.freep.com/article/20130414/NEWS01/130414027/Detroit-house-carries-scary-warning-You-will-get-shot-
That’s the trouble with Chinese food. A few hours later, you’re hungry again.
Police: 6-year-old Lapeer boy caught driving family car was headed to chinese restaurant
Detroit Free Press
A six-year-old Lapeer boy driving his family’s car made it about three miles before he was stopped by residents Saturday morning.
“I opened the door and asked him what he was doing,” Lapeer County Sheriff deputy Karl Sapp recalled. “He told me he was going to the dealer to get the car fixed.”
The boy, who had hit a street sign near his house and cracked the bumper, initially blamed the damage to the car on his father, he said.
His parents were home sleeping around 7:30 a.m. and didn’t know the child was gone with the family’s Ford Taurus station wagon, authorities said.
The boy was initially heading to the Chinese restaurant where he ate the night before.
http://www.freep.com/article/20130414/NEWS06/130414004/Police-6-year-old-Lapeer-boy-caught-driving-family-car-headed-chinese-restaurant
‘Tis a mere flesh wound.
Retail Sales in U.S. Decline by Most in Nine Months
By Alex Kowalski - Apr 12, 2013 1:11 PM PT
Retail sales in the U.S. dropped in March by the most in nine months, pointing to a slowdown in consumer spending as the first quarter drew to a close.
Purchases fell 0.4 percent, the biggest setback since June, after jumping 1 percent in February, according to Commerce Department figures issued today in Washington. Consumer sentiment took a hit this month after employment cooled, a report from Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan also showed.
The sales data prompted economists to trim consumer- spending forecasts from what was projected to be the best quarter in two years. Gains in hiring and wages will be needed to ensure any slowdown proves temporary as federal budget cuts and an increase in the payroll tax restrain the expansion.
“It’s not as if things are falling apart, they’re just softening relative to a strong start to the quarter,” said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York. “The first quarter still looks better than had been expected a few months ago, particularly in the face of the headwinds.”
…
Market Snapshot
Nikkei 13,280.20 -204.97 -1.52%
Hang Seng 21,754.30 -334.73 -1.52%
S&P/ASX 200 4,939.10 -74.44 -1.48%
Asian Stocks Drop as China GDP Grows Less Than Estimated
By Jonathan Burgos - Apr 14, 2013 8:54 PM PT
Asian stocks dropped, with the regional benchmark index retreating from the highest level in 20 months, after Chinese economic growth and industrial production expanded less than economists’ estimated.
Jiangxi Copper Co., China’s largest copper producer, plunged 5 percent in Hong Kong. Newcrest Mining Ltd., Australia’s biggest gold producer, sank 8.7 percent, after the bullion tumbled to the lowest price in almost two years. Nissan Motor Co. (7201), a Japanese carmaker that gets 32 percent of sales from North America, slid 3.3 percent, pacing declines among exporters after U.S. retail sales unexpectedly fell.
The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell 1 percent to 136.81 as of 12:50 p.m. in Tokyo, with about four shares falling for each that rose. Chinese gross domestic product expanded 7.7 percent in the first quarter, missing economists estimates, data released today showed.
“While the medium-term outlook is OK, people are having to digest the fact that some of this short-term news flow isn’t quite as good,” Angus Gluskie, managing director at Sydney- based White Funds Management, which oversees more than $350 million, said before the release of the Chinese data. “There’s no doubt China’s growth over the next five or six years is going to be at a more mature pace than it was over the last decade. We should be expecting lesser rates of growth.”
…
It’s looking like the cost of getting to work may go down some in the next few months:
April 15, 2013, 12:36 a.m. EDT
Oil below $89 as China deepens demand worries
By Carla Mozee, MarketWatch
LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) — Oil futures slid nearly 3% in electronic trade Monday, with weaker-than-anticipated economic reports from China adding to festering worries about slowing growth in global demand for the commodity.
May crude oil (CLK3 -2.62%) fell $2.47, or 2.7%, to $88.83 a barrel in Asian trading after China posted quarterly-growth and monthly industrial-production figures that fell short of expectations.
China said gross domestic product rose 7.7% in the January-March quarter, slower than growth of 7.9% in the fourth quarter, and below expectations for an 8% gain in separate surveys from Dow Jones Newswires and Reuters.
…
It’s no longer Cyprus’s fault that gold is slumping. Rather the culprit du juor is China.
It couldn’t simply be that gold and other hard commodities were irrationally overvalued at the height of an epic global financial panic, and everyone is finally waking up to the fact, could it?
Gold sinks another $56 on China GDP disappointment
Precious metal has nearly duplicated Friday’s session that pushed it into bear-market territory after China growth data fell short of expectations. • Oil tumbles below $89 as China data deepen worries
April 15, 2013, 1:27 a.m. EDT
Gold falls sharply; copper hit after China data
By Carla Mozee, MarketWatch
LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) — Gold futures fell in electronic trade Monday, deepening their descent after entering bear-market territory last week, and prices for industrial metal copper suffered following economic data from China that fell short of expectations.
Gold for June delivery tumbled $61.70, or 4.1%, to $1,440.10 an ounce during Asian trading hours. Gold last week lost 4.7%.
The losses roughly matched gold’s heavy drop on Friday, when it lost $63.50, or 4.1%, to $1,501.40 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. Friday’s settlement price marked a 20.5% drop for the most-active contract from the record high settlement of $1,888.70 an ounce reached on Aug. 22, 2011.
Sentiment in the gold market has suffered in part from recent cuts to price forecasts for the precious metal and outflows from gold exchange-traded products.
Copper prices (HGK3 -1.64%), meanwhile, lost 6 cents, or 1.8%, to $3.29 a pound. Copper’s gain of 0.2% last week was wiped out after China, the world’s second-largest economy, posted quarterly-growth and monthly industrial-production figures that missed analyst expectations.
China’s gross domestic product in the January-March quarter rose 7.7%, slower than growth of 7.9% in the fourth quarter, and below expectations for an 8% gain in separate surveys from Dow Jones Newswires and Reuters.
…
The cost of getting to work is very low for the unemployed.
Gold Bulls Endure Bear Market as Goldman Says Sell: Commodities
By Tony C. Dreibus - Apr 14, 2013 7:43 PM PT
Simon Dawson/Bloomberg
Gold futures for June delivery fell 2.2 percent to $1,531 an ounce at 9:53 a.m. on the Comex in New York.
Hedge funds and other speculators added to bullish gold bets as the metal slumped into a bear market and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. warned the retreat is accelerating after the longest rally in nine decades.
The investors increased net-long positions by 19 percent to 56,084 futures and options in the week ended April 9, the first gain in three weeks, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data show. That contrasts with a 7.9 percent decline in bullish wagers across 18 U.S.-traded raw materials, which fell to a five-week low of 431,581 contracts. Holdings in agriculture dropped to the lowest since September 2006.
The turn in the gold cycle is quickening and investors should sell the metal, Goldman Sachs said in an April 10 recommendation that returned 5.4 percent in three days. Gold retreated as the Standard & Poor’s GSCI Index of 24 raw materials fell to a nine-month low, extending a slump that Citigroup Inc. said marks the “death bell” for the supercycle, or longer-than-average period of rising prices. Global equities advanced to the highest since June 2008 as U.S. stocks reached a record.
“Anybody who did some buying before this big drop is probably in some pain,” said Donald Selkin, who helps manage about $3 billion of assets as chief market strategist at National Securities Corp. in New York. “The perception is that gold is not really needed as a safe haven. People are looking at the stock market and they’re stunned, and there’s no inflation. So people are saying ‘What do we need gold for?’”
…
Will gold plunge below $1400/oz already by tomorrow?
Gold - Electronic (COMEX) Jun 2013
Market closed $1,439.40
Change -62.00 -4.13%
Volume 110,235
Apr 15, 2013 12:32 a.m.
Previous close $ 1,501.40
Day low $1,422
Day high $1,495
Open: $1,481.00
52 week low $1,422
52 week high $1,803
Ask not for whom the death bell tolls: IT TOLLS FOR THEE.
Commodities Slump as ‘Death Bell Rings’; U.S. Stocks Drop
By Lu Wang & Tony C. Dreibus - Apr 12, 2013 1:35 PM PT
Metals and energy sank, sending a gauge of commodities to an eight-month low and extending a slump that Citigroup Inc. said may mark the “death bell” for the four-year rally in materials. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SXXP) fell from a record as retail sales and consumer confidence slid.
The S&P/GSCI Index tumbled 1.3 percent to the lowest level since July. Gold futures plunged as much as 5.3 percent to trade below $1,500 for the first time since 2011 and entered a bear market, amid speculation Cyprus will sell reserves to raise cash. The S&P 500 Index slipped 0.3 percent, while emerging market technology stocks fell the most since August after Infosys Ltd.’s sales forecast missed estimates. The 10-year Treasury note yield lost seven basis points to 1.72 percent, while the dollar strengthened versus 10 of 16 major peers.
U.S. retail sales fell in March by the most in nine months, Commerce Department figures showed, and the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan preliminary index of consumer sentiment sank to the lowest level since July. European stocks and the euro fell earlier as the currency bloc’s finance ministers prepared to meet. Citigroup analysts said there will be “many more losers than winners” for commodities this quarter and most industrial and precious metals will decline.
“It’s partly driven by a number of investors who have come to the conclusion that it’s not attractive to be in commodities, especially with what’s going on in the stock market,” said Jesper Dannesboe, senior commodity strategist at Societe Generale SA in London. “When people see gold going down, that might have reinforced selling in other commodities. We think it’s overdone in base metals, in oil, because the global economy is recovering. In gold, this is the beginning of the bear market.”
…
I can’t help but wonder whether many of the shops which sprang up all over creation the past several years under signs that say “We Buy Gold” are soon to shutter their operations?
Or would a panic in gold actually result in an increase in sales, due to investors dumping their holdings of physical? I guess time will tell…
Gold’s Rout Deepens as Investors Reduce Holdings on Recovery
By Glenys Sim & Phoebe Sedgman - Apr 14, 2013 8:17 PM PT
Gold, which plunged into a bear market last week, extended a rout to the lowest level since April 2011 on expectations that demand for haven assets will contract as the global economy improves. Silver slumped.
Gold for immediate delivery dropped as much as 3.9 percent $1,425.75 an ounce and was at $1,444.07 at 11:14 a.m. in Singapore. Prices tumbled 5 percent on April 12, taking losses to more than 20 percent since the record close in September 2011, and meeting the common definition of a bear market.
Bullion has dropped 14 percent in 2013, after a run of 12 annual gains, as data showed that the U.S. recovery was gaining traction, prompting increased speculation that the central bank will rein in its unprecedented stimulus program. Holdings in exchange-traded products contracted at a record pace in the first quarter, and have fallen for the past nine weeks. The turn in the gold cycle is quickening and investors should sell the metal, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said in an April 10 note.
“The demise of gold is still at an early stage,” Georgette Boele, a commodities strategist at ABN Amro Group NV, wrote in a note today. “Other assets will become increasingly more attractive as the growth outlook improves.”
…
With so many other asset markets around the globe under severe price pressure, the resilience U.S. housing prices is a wonder to behold. Buy a U.S. investment house now, or even ten, as they aren’t making any more land here in the U.S.!
Ex-Soros Adviser Says BOJ Bet on Massive Easing to Backfire
By Mariko Ishikawa & Yumi Ikeda - Apr 14, 2013 6:34 PM PT
The Bank of Japan (8301)’s “huge bet” by boosting quantitative easing won’t turn the economy around and is instead sending the nation toward default, said Takeshi Fujimaki, former adviser to billionaire investor George Soros.
The BOJ said April 4 it will double monthly debt purchases to 7.5 trillion yen ($76 billion). That’s about 70 percent of planned bond issuance from the world’s most heavily indebted government. Governor Haruhiko Kuroda set a two-year horizon for achieving the 2 percent annual inflation target adopted in January at Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s urging and said the monetary base will grow to 270 trillion yen by the end of 2014.
“By expanding the monetary base to 270 trillion yen, the BOJ is making a huge bet which I think it will ultimately lose,” Fujimaki said in an interview in Tokyo on April 11. “Kuroda’s QE announcement is declaring double suicide with the government. The BOJ will have to share the country’s fate and default together.”
The BOJ governor said last week he won’t set a time limit for easing and he had taken all necessary measures for now to achieve the inflation target. Kuroda’s actions drove the yen to a four-year low of 99.95 yen and spurred volatility in government bond markets. The yield on the 10-year note climbed to 0.64 percent today after dropping as much as 14 basis points on April 5 to a record-low 0.315 percent.
Bond Volatility
“The volatility in the JGB market as well as the fact that there is large selling represent fear among investors,” the president of Fujimaki Japan, an investment advising company in Tokyo, said. “They are early signs of a larger selloff and we should continue to monitor the moves in the long-term bonds.”
…
This may not much help the BOJ’s chances of succeeding:
U.S. Urges Japan to Refrain From Competitive Yen Devalue
By Kasia Klimasinska & Ian Katz - Apr 12, 2013 7:27 PM PT
The U.S. Treasury Department said it will press Japan to refrain from competitive devaluation while stopping short of accusing it of manipulating the yen in a report on exchange rates.
The Treasury will pressure Japan to adhere to international commitments “to remain oriented towards meeting respective domestic objectives using domestic instruments and to refrain from competitive devaluation and targeting its exchange rate for competitive purposes,” the department said in its semi-annual currency report to Congress released in Washington yesterday. The report also declined to name China a currency manipulator.
“This is a shot across the BOJ’s bow,” Kit Juckes, a global strategist at Societe Generale SA in London, said in an e-mail. “Everyone still supports Japan’s fight against deflation, but the U.S. would much rather the yen did not weaken significantly further.”
…
How does bird flu spread so fast?
Shanghai Chicken Served With Blood Shunned as Bird Flu Spreads
By Bloomberg News - Apr 14, 2013 4:09 PM PT
Wu Liangui left Shanghai’s Xiao Shaoxing restaurant with a delicacy his daughter wants him to avoid. Inside a plastic box were slices of white-cut chicken, traditionally served rare so that blood seeps from the bones.
“My daughter says I am committing suicide,” the gray- haired 65-year-old said. “But I really enjoy a dinner of chicken and rice wine and I won’t be giving it up easily.”
Wu was one of a few customers still buying Xiao Shaoxing’s specialty after the H7N9 strain of bird flu killed 13 people in China, including nine in Shanghai. Sales of white-cut chicken at the seven-decade old eatery have dropped to about 100 servings a day from as many as 600 before the outbreak, according to deputy General Manager Chen Zhiqiang, who said that in his 30 years at the restaurant he’s never seen demand fall as much.
“I fully understand,” Chen said. “I wouldn’t dare eat chicken either if I didn’t work here.”
…
How does bird flu spread so fast?
Combine densely packed populations, severe air pollution with resultant damage to lung epithelial surfaces, farmers living in close company with their animals & people traveling as never before - with the basic pathogenicity of influenza and its ability to mutate and you can have some real problems in a hurry.
It’s time for beggar-thy-neighbor competition in cybercurrencies.
Try not to catch yourself a falling knife.
Or perhaps I am overly skeptical, and the technogeeks will figure out how to spin unlimited amounts of gold out of memory chips?
Computing News
Bitcoin Isn’t the Only Cryptocurrency in Town
Currencies designed to fix perceived flaws in Bitcoin could lead to competition that makes the idea of digital “cryptocurrency” stick.
By Tom Simonite on April 15, 2013
Why It Matters
Even if interest in Bitcoin fades, it could still have a lasting legacy as an inspiration to better-designed forms of digital money.
In recent weeks, the digital currency Bitcoin has soared and then dipped in value, along the way attracting more public attention than ever before and speculation as to whether it could become an established and widely accepted way to pay for goods and services.
But Bitcoin isn’t the only cryptocurrency out there. Several others are also surging in popularity and value, and they claim to offer technical improvements that make them better suited to mainstream use.
Some of these competing currencies already represent significant stores of value. The value of a single bitcoin on the most popular exchange was $93.70 at time of publication, and the total value of all bitcoins in circulation just over $1 billion (it was over $2 billion at the market’s high point last week). The largest alternative cryptocurrency, litecoins, were worth $2.31 each and $38 million in total; the next largest, PPCoin, were worth $0.22 each adding up to a total value of $4 million.
…
This is so inane, only a technogeek could love the scheme.
Bitcoin Miners Are Racking Up $150,000 A Day In Power Consumption Alone
Ryan Lawler
There’s a gold rush going on these days, or a Bitcoin rush, at least. Driven by the recent swings in the value of a Bitcoin, more and more people are learning about and becoming interested in the currency. While they could just buy Bitcoins at the current market rate, others are looking to try their luck at mining Bitcoins. And like prospectors who traveled west during the Gold Rush of the 19th century, many Bitcoin miners will find that they spend more on chasing the Bitcoin dream than they’ll ever hope to win back.
…
Squatters win, landlord loses –
Dave Thomas, an Akron area landlord, was surprised when he stopped by one of his rental homes
Dave Thomas, an Akron area landlord, was surprised when he stopped by one of his rental homes
If he had a brain, his losses would have been lower: last months rent should have been escrowed; damage deposit equal to one months rent should have been escrowed.
A tenant moving out who wants either or both of the above back WOULD hand the keys back to the LL in order to get it.
Plus, he could/should sue for missed rent payments and damages against the previous tenant, who was the one with a legally-binding contract (lease) that they did not abide by; something on their credit-report would at least serve as a warning to future LLs.