May 23, 2013

Bits Bucket for May 23, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

279 Comments »

Comment by Resistor
2013-05-23 03:12:48

Comment by rms
2013-05-22 06:15:55

“And the Weiner is officially IN!!”

-1 Dead on arrival, IMHO.

———-

Don’t judge weiner jokes. Writing them is hard.

Comment by rms
2013-05-23 05:08:12

“Don’t judge weiner jokes. Writing them is hard.”

Difficult or…hehe…hard?

 
Comment by michael
2013-05-23 06:17:12

“Writing them is hard”

not at first.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 06:35:46

That joke was limp…er, I mean, lame…

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-05-23 20:26:14

Weiner jokes are ALWAYS funny.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-23 04:25:50

Our differences make us stronger…

Oh - and gun control/bans makes us safer.

——————

Blood on his hands…Islamic fanatics wielding meat cleavers butcher a British soldier
UK Daily Mail | 5/22/13 | Arthur Martin and Sam Greenhill

Clutching a bloodied meat cleaver after executing a soldier on a crowded street, he delivers a chilling message of hate.

‘You people will never be safe,’ he declares in a clear south London accent. ‘An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.’

In broad daylight, he and an accomplice had just repeatedly stabbed and tried to behead an off-duty soldier in front of dozens of passers-by.

Throughout the frenzied attack they shouted ‘Allah Akbar’ – Arabic for ‘God is great’ – then demanded horrified witnesses film them as they ranted over the crumpled body.

The two black men in their 20s, waited calmly for armed police to arrive before charging at officers brandishing a rusty revolver, knives and meat cleavers.

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 05:19:24

It’s a good thing the soldier was in London on a crowded street In broad daylight, so the police probably got there within minutes.

Democratic Rep. Mocks Elderly Man During Gun Control Forum: ‘You’d Probably Be Dead Anyway’

by Noah Rothman | 3:55 pm, April 3rd, 2013

DeGette dismissed the questioners concerns. “The good news for you, you live in Denver. The Denver PD would be there within minutes,” she said to the laughter of the crowd.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/democratic-rep-mocks-elderly-man-during-gun-control-forum-youd-probably-be-dead-anyway/ - 209k -

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 05:42:24

“Blowback” from Tony Blair’s lapdog imperialism supporting our AIPAC directed foreign policy boondoggles?

But that might be too complicated for you to understand…

Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 05:55:17

Why do so many muslims kill one another every day throughout the Middle East? What “Blowback” is that from?

Comment by jose canusi
2013-05-23 05:58:39

Different sects.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 08:04:50

Maybe they’re just attacking us because we’re a different sect, too.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 12:06:20

Mr. McAnus aka “michael viking”,

Why are you hiding your occupation from the readers here?

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 06:12:08

If you say that islam is an inherently violent culture, the cultural relativists will call you a racist. But it is an inherently violent culture.

And christianity was the same way for centuries.

But we understand what 2banana’s Drudge-addled mind is trying to say. That gun bans don’t work (they don’t). And that muslims are violent (many are).

The UK and Europe’s immigration policies are suicide. This is true.

Re-posting Drudge links without considering that the U.S. Congress and U.K. Parliament are Israeli-occupied territory lacks context. But that’s racist too…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-23 06:38:21

‘it is an inherently violent culture…And christianity was the same way for centuries’

Our president is the only world leader that has a kill list, to my knowledge. How many people go shot in Chicago last night? Then there’s this:

‘ Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) blasted members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday, which voted overwhelmingly to arm elements of the Syrian opposition in a bill co-sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN). “This is an important moment,” Paul said, addressing his Senate colleagues. “You will be funding, today, the allies of al Qaeda. It’s an irony you cannot overcome.”

‘The legislation, which would authorize the shipment of arms and military training to rebels “that have gone through a thorough vetting process,” passed in a bipartisan 15-3 vote.’

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/05/21/rand_paul_my_colleagues_just_voted_to_arm_the_allies_of_al_qaeda

 
Comment by michael
2013-05-23 06:44:07

“war…for the lack of a better term…is good” - gordon gekko

 
Comment by goon squad
 
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 06:51:16

@Ben -

One wonders, then, if this is why the U.S. Government has been purchasing much ammunition and tanks as of late.

Part of the “Arab Spring”, perhaps?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-05-23 07:48:38

Rand Paul addresses the issue of Muslims killing Muslims. In many cases that killing is facilitated by weapons provided by non-Muslims.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 08:18:01

But I thought Obama and Democrats in Congress were FOR gun control?

I’m wrong again, I see.

Guns in the correct hands (i.e., government sponsored killing) is okay. Guns in the incorrect hands (i.e, in those who might slow the advance of government imperialism) are in the wrong hands.

So that’s what gun control means to Obama.

What does it mean to you?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-23 08:28:50

Our president is the only world leader that has a kill list, to my knowledge. How many people go shot in Chicago last night?

Indeed, if we are going to accuse any culture of being violent, we need to take a hard look in a mirror before throwing accusations. Or as Jesus said, we need to take care of the plank in our eye first.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 08:46:30

jesus said if you believe in him that after you die you get to live on a cloud with Sky Wizard and be reunited with all your dead pets and family members

mohammed said if you believe that his Sky Wizard is the only true Sky Wizard after you die you get to have sex with 72 virgins

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 09:00:25

One wonders, then, if this is why the U.S. Government has been purchasing much ammunition and tanks as of late.

Part of the “Arab Spring”, perhaps?

———————

You realize that DHS purchases are aimed at being overly prepared in case of a teabilly insurrection, right? I can’t tell if you are sincerely asking the question or just rhetorically doing so.

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 09:04:41

Re: the Nader piece… I’ve always liked Nader, he doesn’t have to always be right but at least he isn’t a pathetic shill. The media really ignores/stigmatizes guys like Nader though, see 2000 for example. Nader was the best candidate in that election after Bill Bradley conceded to Gore. The media acted shocked that people wouldn’t naturally back Gore.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 10:38:59

“…after you die you get to have sex with 72 virgins.”

What they don’t tell these guys is that there are ONLY those 72 virgins and now they’re over 1200 years old…

ba da dump.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-23 13:22:50

You realize that DHS purchases are aimed at being overly prepared in case of a teabilly insurrection, right?

Are they? I think most of the controversy is over trying to get them to admit that.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-05-23 20:29:33

They sound like a couple of loonies to me.

But yeah, Islam is inherently violent. When I had to read the Koran for a college course, I learned that Islam requires violence against all nonbelievers. That is quite the opposite from Christianity. Jesus Christ was killed because he declined to be a warlord.

The BASIS of Christianity is peace, but the basis of Islam is violence.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:27:23

Drone strikes: Four American citizens killed in drone strikes (+video)

Drone strikes: Four American citizens killed. Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged Wednesday that US drones have killed four American citizens in Pakistan and Yemen, justifying the attacks under US and international law. President Obama is scheduled to address the subject in a speech Thursday.

By Brad Knickerbocker, Staff writer / May 22, 2013

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 08:07:04

So you’re saying they’re attacking us because we killed our own citizens? Because you’re posting a link that we killed four of our own in response to posts that this incident in the UK was blow-back.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 08:20:01

Just goes to show.

You can trust government with guns, but you can’t trust the citizenry.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 10:22:51

“You can trust government with guns, but you can’t trust the citizenry.”

Govt always knows best.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 11:06:33

“Why do so many muslims kill one another every day throughout the Middle East?

So you’re saying they’re attacking us because we killed our own citizens?”

Nah…just pointing out an instance of the pot calling the kettle black.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 11:08:31

Nah…just pointing out an instance of the pot calling the kettle black.

You lost me. Who’s the pot and who’s the kettle?

 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 08:17:39

Something to do with the crazy borders the british carved the area up into before they abandoned their empire?

Or maybe something to do with sand getting in unwelcome crevices and chafing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by uncle sugar
2013-05-23 08:31:26

That’s racist.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 08:33:52

Something to do with the crazy borders the british carved the area up into before they abandoned their empire?

Not 100% sure (not 100% sure of anything) but weren’t they fighting and killing one another over there well before the area was carved up?

I think it’s the Koran, not the sand in the crevices. Have you read it?

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 09:07:39

Until pretty recently, EVERYBODY was fighting and killing each other. It’s what we did for fun before movies were invented.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 11:45:56

Until pretty recently, EVERYBODY was fighting and killing each other. It’s what we did for fun before movies were invented.

Well, not everyone. Half the population.

I can’t recall anything from the history books about armies of women slaughtering each other.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 11:52:12

Women were often employed at finishing off any wounded enemies left on the battlefield.

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 10:34:20

Why do so many Americans kill one another throughout the day in America?

Some just do it “officially”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 11:06:44

You raise an interesting question which made me do a little research. I quickly found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
which seems to show that the Middle East isn’t all that dangerous compared to Africa and central/south America. It’s hard to get a true read, though, based on the disclaimer at the top about how the data is gathered.

 
 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 06:24:51

Our Department of Defense is really not about defense at all. It’s about offense. And it creates far, far more safety issues than it solves.

AIPAC and the private defense contractors benefit vastly more from our aggressive wars than any of us do. Also, our soldiers are mostly cannon fodder.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 06:37:12

It’s easier to re-post Drudge links than it is to think.

We have a red, white and blue magnetic ribbon that says “Just Pretend It’s All OK” that a friend gave us several years ago. But we never put it on the squadmobile fearing vandalism from a Drudge reactionary, so it’s stuck on the fridge.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2013-05-23 07:06:40

I tell red white and blue Christians that I view the American flag as a false idol.

 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 07:29:32

Who benefits when the government attacks its own populace?

Washington DC is the wealthiest metropolitan area in the country, yet it produces nothing.

I say our domestic imperialism policy is just as strong as any international imperialism efforts we undertake.

Our government desire to be domineering is hardly limited to overseas territory.

I guess that’s hard to discern when one makes his or her paycheck that way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by uncle sugar
2013-05-23 07:36:13

DC = the real free sh*t army. Now shut up and pay your taxes, suckers!

 
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 08:24:22

Domestic imperialism.

Think about it.

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:24:50

MacBeth, did you read my posts yesterday? I responded at length to you. It might surprise you to know that I agree with you on most of what you say. Both of our parties are seriously f’ed up. But they’re the only ones who are allowed at the official debates, they’re the only ones who can afford air time. It’s a very sad situation. People who shill for either party or blindly link to Drudge or any other brainless source are part of the problem, not the solution.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 10:26:54

It’s a very sad situation. People who shill for either party or blindly link to Drudge or any other brainless source are part of the problem, not the solution.

________

Drudge bad
HuffPo, Kos good

Tea Party bad
Occupy good

But you’re non-partisan.

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 10:46:30

I never said either of those things. Although Drudge is extremely dumbed down for sure. I think a lot of what’s on DailyKos is “out there” and one-sided, thus not helpful. Drudge is dumbed down in a different way. HuffPo really falls into all the usual media traps - going for page views/buzz rather than deep reporting.

The tea party is bad as it’s now constituted. They basically support the GOP, which is a big part of our country’s problem. Same problem with MoveOn on the DEM side. Aligning with either party is not going to solve any problems.

Occupy, to the extent it drew attention to the problems of corporate kleptocracy and greed, could’ve been very useful.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Jess from upstate SC
2013-05-23 05:44:31

It looks like they hit the soldier with a car first , completely unexpected like , the cowards , to make sure he couldn’t protect himself….
It appears like no one in the crowd was armed , just a bunch of harmless onlookers. Armed British Police arrived in 14 minutes. That’s what could happen here , but for the vast number of CWP carriers , although most folks seem to carry small 32. cal automatics here .I would guess about 1 out of every 4 adults, both men & women ,carry guns here in upstate SC,in my Rural area…It keeps a lot of the crazy night-time folks more law abiding ,at least in daytime…

Comment by Montana
2013-05-23 06:16:08

rather hard to be armed in the UK.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-23 07:10:46

Yeah, if only there had been armed citizens there- and the murderers still only carried knives.

But if the murderers had also been carrying guns, then they might have shot up a pub full of soldiers, killing many more.

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-23 07:31:54

Because islamic murders will follow gun laws?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-23 08:23:46

‘The most feared and effective rebel group battling President Bashar al-Assad, the Islamist Nusra Front, is being eclipsed by a more radical jihadi force whose aims go far beyond overthrowing the Syrian leader. Al Qaeda’s Iraq-based wing, which nurtured Nusra in the early stages of the rebellion against Assad, has moved in and sidelined the organization, Nusra sources and other rebels say.’

‘Al Qaeda in Iraq includes thousands of foreign fighters whose ultimate goal is not toppling Assad but the anti-Western jihad of al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri - a shift which could extend Syria’s conflict well beyond any political accord between Assad and his foes. The fighting has already cost 90,000 lives.’

‘Nusra is now two Nusras. One that is pursuing al Qaeda’s agenda of a greater Islamic nation, and another that is Syrian with a national agenda to help us fight Assad,’ said a senior rebel commander in Syria who has close ties to the Nusra Front. ‘It is disintegrating from within.’

‘Golani, a radical Sunni Muslim, won popularity in Syria even among some Christians, according to the Nusra fighter. “Baghdadi did not like this,” the fighter said. “Baghdadi and the (al Qaeda) leadership consider the Muslim Brotherhood, the Free Syrian Army and other factions including Christians as infidels and when they saw Golani was on good terms with them they were not happy. That is why he announced the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant without any consultation with Golani, and he is in charge to operate in his old failed way.’

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/17/us-syria-crisis-nusra-idUSBRE94G0FY20130517

All I know is what we are told on the nightly news is not what’s really happening. And 90k dead in a civil war we are perpetuating? What did Syria do to us?

These Al Qaeda people we are arming are some bad dudes. The use suicide bombers, have already set up religious police (Saudi style), post videos of mass executions and beheadings. Here’s something the MSM doesn’t mention; it was Al Qaeda we armed/provided air support for, in Libya too. We lost track of 10,000 missiles in Libya, some of them Stingers.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 22:17:01

Well, we armed them in Chechnya, then later in Afghanistan (remember that Bin Ladin guy? We equipped him and gave him the money to build the Tora Bora complex). We armed them in Iraq2 (to the benefit of Iran where they regrouped) –even as we supposedly fought them. Now they’ve moved on to Syria it only makes sense that we arm them there. Why do we arm them? Because they can be induced to fight against strong secular rulers who selfishly want to impede America’s oiligarchy by keeping their borders, finances, and/or natural reserves to themselves.

War is good for the economy, remember? It will be interesting to see what new schisms develop after Obama’s speech today — which essentially threw the war-powers ball back into Congress’ court, where they reliably voted to arm “the rebel fighters” in Syria.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-23 04:28:07

Out of curiosity - I wonder how the costs compare to America.

Oh yeah - huge housing bubble in Australia on the popping point.

————————

Ford Australia to close Broadmeadows and Geelong plants, 1,200 jobs to go
ABC News Australia | 5/22/2013 | abcnews.com.au

Ford Australia says it will close its Australian manufacturing plants in October 2016, with the loss of hundreds of jobs.

Ford president Bob Graziano said approximately 1,200 workers would lose their jobs when the Broadmeadows and Geelong plants were shut down.

He made the announcement in Melbourne this morning after announcing that the company had lost $141 million over the last financial year - taking losses over the past five years to more than $600 million. Key points

Ford to close plants in 2016 More than 1,000 jobs to go, more at risk Government promises support for sacked staff

“Our costs are double that of Europe and nearly four times Ford in Asia,” Mr Graziano said.

Comment by perkonkrusts
2013-05-23 08:21:37

That’s a tale of two countries, in the U.S. Ford is adding manufacturing capacity of 200,000 vehicles.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/05/22/ford-adds-production-in-north-america-to-meet-new-car-demand/

Apparently the high value of the Aussie dollar is primarily what is killing manufacturing down under.

 
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 04:57:18

“Just like Benghazi. GOP cuts funding for embassy security the previous year, then blames the President for security FAIL.”

“According to the email, several officials in the meeting shared the concern of Nuland, who was not part of the deliberations, that the CIA’s talking points might lead to criticism that the State Department had ignored the CIA’s warning about an attack.”

“Even the closest force couldn’t get there in time.”

“The U.S. Souda Bay Naval Base is an hour’s flight from Libya.”

“But that’s not the point. The point is the embassy security was gutted from lack of funding, thus making it vulnerable in the first place.”

Forget the fact that both loser parties cut the funding, (see washington post fact chcker) what was the funding for? 3-5 more guys with rifles? I don’t know do you? Seems like any security under attack from rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and AK-47 rifles would just have to hold the fort until help came from say, oh I don’t know maybe a Naval Base that is an hour’s flight from Libya.

This was incompetence or worse, with a cover up that included a lot of help from the media.

By Sharyl Attkisson /
CBS News/ May 6, 2013, 12:00 PM

Diplomat: U.S. Special Forces told “you can’t go” to Benghazi during attacks

The deputy of slain U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens has told congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command Africa.

The account from Gregory Hicks is in stark contrast to assertions from the Obama administration, which insisted that nobody was ever told to stand down and that all available resources were utilized. Hicks gave private testimony to congressional investigators last month in advance of his upcoming appearance at a congressional hearing Wednesday.

According to excerpts released Monday, Hicks told investigators that SOCAFRICA commander Lt. Col. Gibson and his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi prior to an attack on a second U.S. compound “when [Col. Gibson] got a phone call from SOCAFRICA which said, ‘you can’t go now, you don’t have the authority to go now.’ And so they missed the flight … They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.”

No assistance arrived from the U.S. military outside of Libya during the hours that Americans were under attack or trapped inside compounds by hostile forces armed with rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and AK-47 rifles.

Hicks told congressional investigators that if the U.S. had quickly sent a military aircraft over Benghazi, it might have saved American lives. The U.S. Souda Bay Naval Base is an hour’s flight from Libya.

“I believe if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them,” Hicks testified. Two Americans died in the morning mortar attack.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57583014/diplomat-u.s-special-forces-told-you-cant-go-to-benghazi-during-attacks/ - 125k

Initial Benghazi Talking Points Changed 12 Times, Mentions Of Terror Removed

Doug Mataconis · Friday, May 10, 2013

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before sheappeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

According to the Stephen Hayes at The Weekly Standard the changes all seemed to come at the request of the State Department:

[O]ne previously opaque aspect of the Obama administration’s efforts is becoming somewhat clearer. An email sent to Susan Rice following a key White House meeting where officials coordinated their public story lays out what happened in that meeting and offers more clues about who might have rewritten the talking points.

The CIA’s talking points, the ones that went out that Friday evening, were distributed via email to a group of top Obama administration officials. Forty-five minutes after receiving them, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland expressed concerns about their contents, particularly the likelihood that members of Congress would criticize the State Department for “not paying attention to Agency warnings.” CIA officials responded with a new draft, stripped of all references to Ansar al Sharia.

In an email a short time later, Nuland wrote that the changes did not “resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership.” She did not specify whom she meant by State Department “building leadership.” Ben Rhodes, a top Obama foreign policy and national security adviser, responded to the group, explaining that Nuland had raised valid concerns and advising that the issues would be resolved at a meeting of the National Security Council’s Deputies Committee the following morning. The Deputies Committee consists of high-ranking officials at the agencies with responsibility for national security​—​including State, Defense, and the CIA​—​as well as senior White House national security staffers.

The Deputies Committee convened the next morning, Saturday the 15th. Some participants met in person, while others joined via a Secure Video Teleconference System (abbreviated SVTS and pronounced “siv-its”).

The proceedings were summarized in an email to U.N. ambassador Rice shortly after the meeting ended. The subject line read: “SVTS on Movie/Protests/violence.” The name of the sender is redacted, but whoever it was had an email address suggesting a job working for the United States at the United Nations.

According to the email, several officials in the meeting shared the concern of Nuland, who was not part of the deliberations, that the CIA’s talking points might lead to criticism that the State Department had ignored the CIA’s warning about an attack. Mike Morell, deputy director of the CIA, agreed to work with Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to edit the talking points. At the time, Sullivan was deputy chief of staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the State Department’s director of policy planning; he is now the top national security adviser to Vice President Joe Biden. Denis McDonough, then a top national security adviser to Obama and now his chief of staff, deferred on Rhodes’s behalf to Sullivan.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/initial-benghazi-talking-points-changed-12-times-mentions-of-terror-removed/ - 203k

Comment by jose canusi
2013-05-23 06:06:19

Benghazi, feh. That’s where the State defartment rolled over on its own. I do feel for those who were collateral damage. But in a sense, Chris Stevens died by his own hand, since he was a major player in bringing about the conditions that caused the situation. Eerie how similar his death was to that of Quaddafi.

It also speaks to the “character” (and I used the term loosely) of those in the upper echelon of the administration. God help anyone who works in a position inferior to these turds, because Benghazi is a cautionary tale as to how they would be treated when the chips are down. And if they feel that way about “their own”, imagine how they feel about the rest of us? Think about that.

Comment by michael
2013-05-23 06:41:29

benghazi is simple…the president was running for re-election and was running around saying “osama is dead and GM is alive” and “al qaeda is on their heels”. this attack was contrary to his narrative so they hid the fact that it was an al qaeda attack. obama’s narrative was important because he was using it to illustrate a “succesful” foreign policy with respect to terror.

hillary pretty much admitted this when she said “what difference, AT THIS POINT, does it make”.

basically saying that it did make a difference at some earlier point (before the election).

all it proves is obama and politiians in general are shit tards…but i didn’t need benghazi to convince me of that.

now the issue with denied security is important but i think that is just incompetence…but i didn’t need benghazi to illustrate that either.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 06:53:03
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 07:21:05

“now the issue with denied security is important but i think that is just incompetence…”

An ignored CIA warning of a Sep. 11 attack and a stand down order that evidently came from the low level of the Cincinnati IRS office would suggest more than incompetence.

“According to the email, several officials in the meeting shared the concern of Nuland, who was not part of the deliberations, that the CIA’s talking points might lead to criticism that the State Department had ignored the CIA’s warning about an attack.”

By Sharyl Attkisson /
CBS News/ May 6, 2013, 12:00 PM

Diplomat: U.S. Special Forces told “you can’t go” to Benghazi during attacks

The deputy of slain U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens has told congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command Africa.
————————————————————————-
The shortest flight between Benghazi, LY and Tripoli, LY on Buraq Air is 416 miles.
————————————————————————-
“Hicks told congressional investigators that if the U.S. had quickly sent a military aircraft over Benghazi, it might have saved American lives. The U.S. Souda Bay Naval Base is an hour’s flight from Libya.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 22:36:11

“…a stand down order that evidently came from the low level of the Cincinnati IRS office…”

WTF? Link please?

 
 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-23 07:18:45

The Right runs down their scandal rabbit hole again, thinking the rest of the nation agrees with their obsessions about the evil communist President.

Just like when they went after Clinton on the Lewinsky crock of nothing. And then promptly lost the second-term midterm elections.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 07:26:48

We have a liberal friend who shrugs at all of Obama’s scandals and also blames his drones/assassinations policies on Bush 43’s invasion of Iraq.

Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 07:36:46

Useful idiots is the term you are looking for, goon.

Those still defending Obama are as blind and willfully dumb as any religious fanatic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-05-23 15:22:30

“We have a liberal friend who shrugs at all of Obama’s scandals and also blames his drones/assassinations policies on Bush 43’s invasion of Iraq.”

I dislike these ‘tards as much as those who continually bash Obama, but never breathed a word as the Bush admin and their “Patriot Act” eroded more Constitutional rights than anything ever before seen. You listening, Banana Boy?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 07:27:28

“Just like Benghazi. GOP cuts funding for embassy security the previous year, then blames the President for security FAIL.”

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 05:02:27

“The Massive Housing Price Decline Ahead Of Us”

http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/7812/caseshiller.jpg

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 09:04:18

How is the red line the “longterm trendline” when every number to the left of 1987, going back to 1890 (per Shiller’s own long term data using different sources), far below 75?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:26:38

And they’ll keep falling until resale prices are under replacement costs.

Catching on yet?

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 05:03:32

“Housing prices falling to dramatically lower and more affordable levels is bullish optimism and a boost to the economy.”

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-23 05:04:11

Low-skilled Worked Get Raw Deal Under Obamacare
Townhall.com | May 23, 2013 | Michael Barone

You might be wondering what a “skinny” or “low-benefit” insurance plan is. The terms may vary, but the basic idea is that policies would cover preventive care, a limited number of doctor visits and perhaps generic drugs.

They wouldn’t cover things such as surgery, hospital stays or prenatal care. That sounds similar to an auto insurance policy that reimburses you when you change the oil but not when your car gets totaled.

You might ask how Obamacare could encourage the proliferation of such policies. It was sold as a way to provide more coverage for more people, after all.

And people were told they could keep the health insurance they had.

As Weaver and Mathews explain, Obamacare’s requirement that insurance policies include “essential” benefits such as mental health services apply only to small businesses with fewer than 50 employees.

But larger employers, they write, “need only cover preventive service, without a lifetime or annual dollar-value limit, in order to avoid the across-the-workforce penalty.” Low-benefit plans may cost an employer only $40 to $100 a month per employee. That’s less than the $2,000-per-employee penalty for providing no insurance.

“We wouldn’t have anticipated that there’d be demand for these type of Band-Aid plans in 2014,” the Journal quotes former White House health adviser Robert Kocher. “Our expectation was that employers would offer high-quality insurance.”

It’s probably true that businesses trying to attract and retain high-skill employees for long-term positions have an economic incentive to offer generous and attractive health insurance. Otherwise they’d lose good people to competitors.

But the kind of businesses mentioned in the Journal story — restaurants, retailers, assisted-living chains — tend to employ lower-skill workers who typically work there only temporarily.

In a high-unemployment economy they may not need to offer gold-plated health insurance to get the workforce they need.

Such employers would have to pay a $3,000 penalty for each employee who buys insurance on Obamacare’s health insurance exchanges. But it seems likely that many workers, especially young ones, would opt not to pay the hefty premiums for that.

The problem here is that Obamacare’s architects seem to misunderstand the concept of insurance.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 05:56:47

Obamacare is not the same thing as single payer.

Health care = 18% of USA GDP.
Countries with single payer deliver better results at half the cost.

Comment by WT Econonmist
2013-05-23 06:33:33

Right. These low cost plans are a concession to the rich, the public employee unions, and the Republicans and Democrats who represent them.

These people are currently uninsured. If they get sick, they lose whtat little assets they have and then are covered by Medicaid. Taxpayers. Or are left to die.

The only difference is that maybe a little preventive care will lower Medicaid costs.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-23 08:30:00

Obamacare is not the same thing as single payer.

+1000. It’s a private insurers wet dream.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 08:40:42

the corporate paymasters who purchase our congress want the sheeple to think that obamacare and single payer are the same thing. when your brain is clouded in a fog of drudge the whole thing just gets smeared as socialism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:51:42

Another thing is that Obamacare is another subsidy of the old by the young. There are limits on how much more can be charged for health insurance for an old person vs a young person. A 60 yr old can only be charged 3x what a 30 yr old can be charged. So the prices are raised for 30 yr olds and lowered for 60 yr olds. Even though 60 yr olds consume VASTLY more health care than 30 yr olds.

We just need to get this over with and go single payer.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-05-23 10:35:44

Joe, ALL health insurace is a subsidy of the old by the young. It is justified by the knowledge that in time, the young will be the old and will need the young to subsidy them.

The advantage of single payer is to take employee hours and energy and stress that is now used for navigating the pay system and use it for care. And then, take money that is now used for profit and use it for care. And then, take the money that is used for lobbying and salespeople and use it for care.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 12:13:51

“The advantage of single payer is to take employee hours and energy and stress that is now used for navigating the pay system and use it for care. And then, take money that is now used for profit and use it for care. And then, take the money that is used for lobbying and salespeople and use it for care.”

Just like Canada does where there is a 6 month wait for surgery. It’s cool. Just take an aspirin every day. Those 6 months will fly by.

 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 15:18:52

“Countries with single payer deliver better results at half the cost.”

Like Canada where the wait for surgery is 6 months. But don’t worry, those 6 months will fly by, you’ll barely notice the pain.

 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 06:26:28

Single payer health care will come soon hopefully. Bye-bye middleman health insurance company scum.

Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 07:17:21

To be replaced by a program enacted by the wealthiest in the country, by people who somehow have become wealthiest in spite of producing nothing.

ObamaCare will be the first disaster (as planned). It never did matter what was in it (which is why itsa proponents never got on stage to promote the heck out of it), as the end goal was to screw up everything even more than it is already.

Then single payer will come to the rescue! Thank God! Alas, it too will be a disaster.

Washington DC will succeed in expanding its power and become increasingly corrupt as it tells even more lies to justify its actions.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 07:50:30

It’s always so black or white for you, isn’t it? We support legal guns, all guns. We think you should be able to buy guns at 7-Eleven and buy ammo from vending machines. We also support single-payer health care, because want to be as miserable as those miserable Canadians and miserable Scandinavians.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 08:35:44

It’s black and white to me because I don’t profit from government intrusion and corruption.

You DO profit, which is why everything is gray for you.

You make a good income without having to be productive. You don’t generate a profit. You cut expenses. The two are not the same.

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:48:45

How do I profit from the government? I represent PRIVATE contractors. My paychecks come from private companies who are defending themselves against the government (e.g. FCA lawsuits) or suing the government so they can be paid more or that a contract can be re-bid. If anything, my department of my firm is a nemesis to the government.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-05-23 09:04:00

You DO profit, which is why everything is gray for you.

That dog don’t hunt.

I don’t think his job is the reason why he can recognize shades of gray. That is a matter of critical thinking and objectivity.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 09:10:35

Was I a “Producer” when I worked for Big Firm (CPA, not Law), tasked with helping our bootstrapper clients maximize their Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement from the government (this was a specialty firm, we actually had nurses on staff and former nursing home directors as partners), simultaneously as our tax staff worked to (obviously) minimize their tax bill?

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 09:19:33

Macbeth doesn’t get it, the idea that both parties love the current system so that profiting from it is an adaptation. The money I receive for my services is money I’m free to save or spend, it opens up other opportunities later in life. I’m sure it’s the same for you. People have to live in the real world.

IIRC, Macbeth was a Romney supporter, so instead of criticizing, he/she should be a big supporter of what I do.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-05-23 10:32:02

Another way to describe single payer would be “Medicare for all” because that would be the way to implement single payer - just extend the current Medicare system to cover every American. As I mentioned over the weekend, Medicare is much more efficient than private insurance companies and is one of the most popular institutions in American life.

Of course, if anyone would like to criticize Medicare, I’m sure that there are many things to criticze. Any institution created and run by fallible men and women will make mistakes.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-23 08:32:49

To be replaced by a program enacted by the wealthiest in the country, by people who somehow have become wealthiest in spite of producing nothing.

That’s hyperbole. We certainly do not produce “nothing”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 08:41:11

True. You do produce much red tape and lots of headaches and ulcers.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 10:53:43

One could argue that government contractors and employees are producing precisely what we the taxpayers PAY them to produce for us.

What do you produce, MacBeth? Just the general field is sufficient.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 11:08:14

I think MacBeth is a trust fund baby (i.e. a consumer, not a producer).

Just a hunch…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 05:05:28

“The Housing Market Recovery Is ‘A Complete Hoax’”

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/the_housing_shell_game_20130503/

Afterall, a “housing recovery” is dramatically lower prices by definition.

If you bought a house 1998-current, you’ve already lost alot of money. And the losses will continue to grow.

Beware.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-23 05:54:14

If you bought a house 1998-current, you’ve already lost alot of money. And the losses will continue to grow.

Unless you’re A-Rod:

Alex Rodriguez to sell home for $30 million

Yankees third baseman Alex Rodriguez bought his 19,861 square foot home in Miami Beach for $7.4 million in 2010. He has recently accepted a $30 million offer for it. Take a look inside his luxurious mansion.

http://sports.yahoo.com/photos/alex-rodriguez-to-sell-home-for-30-million-1369263896-slideshow/

Comment by perkonkrusts
2013-05-23 06:39:34

This was simply a math error. Since that house must have declined by 65% since A-Rod bought it, the new buyer meant to offer $3,000,000 but accidentally added one too many zeros and offered $30,000,000.

I’m sure the buyers will soon realize their mistake and instead decide to rent for half the cost of owning. Meanwhile, A-Rod will be drowning in tears fueled by his massive real estate losses.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:35:27

RAL actually said something like this to me when I pointed out that Taylor Swift did something similar last year. She had a house next to the Kennedy Compound in Mass. and then sold it, after a rather brief period, for millions more than the purchase price. RAL argued it was lies and she obviously lost money. It’s like he’s completely incapable of admitting that not everyone loses money every time and that certain celebrity-driven markets are particularly prone to crazy price fluctuations - - in both directions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 11:55:52

You’re obviously lying.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 12:25:34

Depreciating assets in loss. Houses are depreciating assets ALWAYS.

Work that truth into your delusional corrupt minds.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 09:07:07

You keep posting that garbage, and I’ll keep posting the truth:

Alexander Reed Kelly

2010 graduate of Western Washington University, with a BA in Humanities and Liberal Studies (Per LinkedIn).

He was a freshman in college in 2005.

The article includes misreading/misinterpreting of other’s work (Mark Lieberman’s 7MM homes held off market are the total held off market in the US per the Census, not by banks, but by EVERYONE, including vacation homes) and a complete misunderstanding of the Private Equity industry (commenting that the PE industry has access to cheap capital, when in fact, the “Equity” in the “Private Equity” industry expects to see returns in the high-teens to low 20%’s).

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:31:47

Rental Watch,

You’re untrustworthy. You don’t know what the truth is. Why? Because you continually exaggerate and misrepresent housing in spite of the fact you have a stake in the direction of prices.

What did you pay for the house you bought last year?

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 11:54:57

If you are going to make demands where you won’t get answers, at least have your facts right, we bought in 2011.

And my personal financial interest is far less in my home value rising than land values rising, since that is where the bulk of my investment dollars went.

Since my business is investing in real estate (primarily commercial), I have plenty of other real estate investments–I don’t consider my house one of them, it’s shelter.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 12:19:11

You have a stake in the direction of prices. This is the reason why you post misrepresentations and falsehoods about housing. Expect to be exposed for the liar you are.

What did you pay for the depreciating debt shack you bought?

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 12:43:06

You have a stake in the direction of prices.

So what’s YOUR stake? Why care so much?

You are posting the same thing over and over, harassing and insulting other people for what?

For no good reason? (then you’re fer reals crazy)

To what end? What’s your stake?

Until you reveal your motivations, you’re nothing but a crackpot to everyone here.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 14:52:03

They only crackpot is you my helpless victim.

 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 12:23:11

Florida-Based Lender Processing Services Inc. to Pay $35 Million in Agreement to Resolve Criminal Fraud

http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/February/13-crm-206.html

This is the outfit that publishes fraudulent data that “Rental Watch” likes to quote.

Go ahead and disclose to the readers what your relationship is with LPS “Rental Watch”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 13:32:26

I read LPS’s data as one of the sources that posts delinquency data.

There, that’s my relationship with them.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 14:53:07

You’re a crook.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-23 05:06:28

Japan Stock Market Crash Leads To Global Sell Off
Zero Hedge | May 23, 2013 | Tyler Durden

We had no idea how right we would be because the second Japan opened, its bond futures market was halted on a circuit breaker as the 10 Year bond plunged to their lowest level since early 2012, hitting 1% and leading to massive Mark to Market losses for Japanese banks, as we also warned would happen. That was just the beginning, and suddenly the realization crept in that the plunging yen at this point is not only negative for banks, but for the entire stock market, leading to what until that point was a solid up session for the Nikkei to the first rumblings of a ris-off.

Shortly thereafter we got the distraction of the Chinese Mfg PMI which dropped into contraction territory for the first time since late 2012, and which set the mood decidedly risk-offish, although the real catalyst may have been a report on copper from Goldman’s Roger Yan (which we will cover in depth shortly) and whose implications may be stunning and devastating and may have just popped the Chinese credit bubble (oh, btw, short copper).

And then all hell broke loose, with the Nikkei first rising solidly and then something snapping loud and clear, and sending the index crashing a massive 1,143 an intraday swing of 9% high to low, leading to an over 200 pips move lower in the USDJPY, and leading to a global risk off across the world. Looks like Mrs Watanabe’s infatuation with the “get rich scheme” known as the stock market is once again over, and it is time to start from scratch for Kuroda and Goldman proxy company.

Nikkei: -7.32% Hang Seng: -2.54% DAX: -2.64% FTSE 100: -1.9% CAC 40: -2.3% FTSE MIB: -2.56%

Comment by michael
2013-05-23 06:13:39

“10 Year bond plunged to their lowest level since early 2012, hitting 1%”

i do not understand this statement…is the 1% its yield? what was the yield before?

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-23 06:19:20

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/japan-stocks-dive-benchmark-bond-071310126.html

‘The Nikkei, even after Thursday’s fall, is up 39 percent so far this year.’

So why is it up 40% in a year? Of, right, they are printing a bunch of money. Then it falls because of bonds, or a speech or something. It’s never reported, “stock fell because they went up too fast in too short a time.”

Comment by michael
2013-05-23 06:25:58

thanks…so the 10 year yield spikes to a wopping 1% and it’s reported as some sort of catastrophe for equities…man this global economy is screwed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bluestar
2013-05-23 08:41:19

Just watch where all the debt is spread out over time. The US has massively increased it’s debt load but the percent that is on the short end of the curve is the most dangerous since the cost to roll it over becomes a death spiral. The increase in the bite this interest takes on the budget can gut a economy faster than you can raise taxes to pay for it.

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 10:03:36

Didn’t they take care of this with Operation Twist by preemptively buying up short term and reissuing long term debt? (I’m asking because I’m really not sure, I can’t keep all these programs straight.)

 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-05-23 13:29:16

That what I remember too. From what I can tell the buying was spread over all maturities though. The program ended last year after nearly 700 billion. One of their tricks is to have so many programs in play you can’t pin them down. You have to admit the numbers are so large that it numbs the mind. Turns out that radical economic policies is a effective tool to manipulate markets and should be proof that supply side/trickle down economics still works (except the trickle part never did work).

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-05-23 21:33:21

Didn’t they take care of this with Operation Twist by preemptively buying up short term and reissuing long term debt?

You have it exactly backwards, Joe. Operation Twist was selling short-term bonds, and buying long-term bond (6 to 30yr) in an effort to drive up prices of long-terms bonds, and then drive down their yields.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 23:33:40

Thanks for this, prime. My head was about to explode there….

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-05-24 06:50:33

:-) Happy to help, Allena…

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-23 06:29:25

There is no free lunch.

There is no free money.

If there was - it would have worked for the 100’s of times other countries have tried it and failed in world history.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by uncle sugar
2013-05-23 08:02:02

Lunch may not be free but her gas and mortgage are:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36×8rTb3jI

 
Comment by measton
2013-05-23 08:35:53

There is plenty of free money.

Just none for you and me.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 09:08:11

I believe it was Kyle Bass who said that the best performing stock market over the past decade was Zimbabwe’s, but now your entire portfolio will only buy 3 eggs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 06:44:22

How is that decoupling theory holding these days?

Bulletin U.S. stocks open lower in wake of Japan washout and Fed ‘tapering’ signal
Japan, China and Fed spell stock slump on Wall Street
• Drop in jobless claims continues to show modest employment growth
• Weak signal from U.S. manufacturing | Home prices on rise in March
• Why a freefall on the Nikkei should not be a signal for Wall Street

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 05:06:49

“Why pay these grossly inflated asking prices for resale housing when you can rent the same thing for half the monthly cost?”

Comment by goon squad
 
 
Comment by polly
2013-05-23 05:41:20

Has anyone taken a look at the new “your accounts” page at USAA Federal Savings Bank? Looks pretty terrible to me. I checked out the “your spending” page. It double counted everything and triple counted anything paid by credit card.

For example, they counted moving money from my savings account to my checking account as spending. They counted paying my credit card bill as spending. And they counted buying something with a credit card as spending. So, when I bought a pair of sneakers last month with a USAA credit card, it was counted as spending on the credit card, counted again when I paid the credit card bill and counted again because I paid the credit card with money I had moved from savings (where my work checks are deposited) to checking.

I deleted the “your spending” tile. Accounting that brain dead is not useful to see.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:38:06

Interesting, I used to have a USAA account but now I have Congressional Federal Credit Union. I think such “accounting” apps are gimmicks to give people the appearance of maybe one day getting their budget together and controlling their spending. But what is clear is that free apps don’t provide that much and people don’t demand that much because most people are on a shoestring budget or dependent on credit anyway.

 
 
Comment by scdave
 
Comment by Brett
2013-05-23 05:54:39

No bubble here in Austin
——

2,563 – Single-family homes sold, 32 percent more than April 2012.

$227,250 – Median price for single-family homes, eight percent more than April 2012.

——

AUSTIN — There’s no question that right now Austin is a seller’s market. Even with buyers spending tens of thousands of dollars over the asking price, new numbers released Tuesday show Austin home sales are up 32 percent compared to this time last year.

Additionally, homes sales here are the highest they’ve been for nearly a decade, and prices are up eight percent.
This rapid growth has some wondering whether the boom will become a bubble.

Austin real estate is so hot, national housing site Trulia put it on “bubble watch,” calling it the “number two most overvalued market in the country.”

The force behind this trend is job growth and supply and demand.
“What it says is that the Austin market has a very tight inventory,” said Cathy Coneway with the Austin Board of Realtors.

Too many people moving and not enough homes means buyers are making offers far over the asking price and still getting outbid.
“We’re seeing things go on the market, and we could get six to 10 offers on the first day,” said Coneway.

“I’ve been a realtor for 18 years. I’ve worked in two states, and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Theresa Bastian of KeepAustinWeirdHomes.com.

But is this boom pushing us toward a housing bubble? The Austin Board of Realtors says “no.”

“Jobs are what drive the housing market. As long as jobs are coming in, we’ll have a hot housing market,” said Coneway.

Coneway also says Austin is avoiding the “housing bubble” because people move here to buy homes for their families, not as investment properties.
The Austin Board of Realtors expects the market to continue to grow for the next several years.

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 06:05:45

What happened with the granite counter?

Comment by Brett
2013-05-23 06:18:06

Oh ya!
I guess I forgot to give you an update.
She must have had some strange change of heart. I was waiting to receive the check and list of damages; when i finally got it, she only took $100 off so I left it alone.

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 06:24:33

“she only took $100 off so I left it alone.”

:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:39:22

Nicely done on your part.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2013-05-23 06:18:27

they always deny a bubble exists until it deflates. I have a feeling the party will last awhile.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-23 06:24:26

$227,250 median house price, $42,689 median household income.

5.3x income. Seems awfully bubbly, unless Austin has joined the great coastal cities that seem to defy the normal income to house price ratio.

 
Comment by PeakHubris
2013-05-23 08:45:06

I will forever remember Ben’s story of a couple shooting up drugs at the cafe after lunch in a hip area of Austin.

 
Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 09:40:31

But is this boom pushing us toward a housing bubble? The Austin Board of Realtors says “no.”

Austin Board of realtors probably couldn’t find its fat a$$ with both hands

Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 12:00:32

Here’s your bubble:
Criminy.

The cheapest single-family home on the SF MLS

Readers from time to time ask why On the Block covers so many expensive homes and celebrity real estate. The answer is pretty simple: they make for better house porn, the glitz and glamour, the gorgeous layouts– even the tasteless displays of wealth tend to make better photo-ops than homes on the more modest end of the scale. The gallery above should confirm this.

Still, homes under $500K in San Francisco are news, whether they look sexy in photos or not. So today we look at 4 such homes. That means you got what you asked for, readers. We leave it up to you to decide– when it comes to these homes– if you get what you pay for.

There are only 22 single-family homes on the MLS now in San Francisco listing under $500K (and the least expensive of these we’ve shown you, above). All of them are in the southeast: Bayview, the Excelsior, Visitacion Valley, Silver Terrace and the Inner-Mission- in other words, District 10.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 13:00:13

A city without a middle class. How “progessive”. Where do the dishwashers and nannies and lanscapers all live? Do they BART across the Bay from Richmond or somewhere? We hear Oakland’s getting pricey too…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 13:32:10

A city without a middle class.

Pretty much.

Hence the Mayor’s Office of Housing giving out all sorts of interest-free down payment assistance to regular folks.

Worked for me. But it ‘aint the answer.

The rent is too damn high.

 
Comment by mathguy
2013-05-23 15:48:51

sf:

don’t you think it is a bit of a white lie to say you are a good example of purchasing at less than the cost of owning when you got all kinds of interest free loans and grants to finance your purchase?
I mean, I know the very very specifics of your case make your monthly payment about equal to rent and therefore may make sense for you, bit wasn’t it a pretty non-standard set of transactions that transpired to put you in that position? Didn’t you get like a 100k grant or something, and some huge interest free loan?

In other words, if you had to put 20% down for the full sale price for your house and finance with regular 3.5% or whatever fixed for 30 years like a regular person not sucking up some gov’t program money, what would your payment be? Trust me, my view is “good for you” that you were able to get your bit out of all these various programs, but for “normal” transactions, wouldn’t it sort of not make sense?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 06:03:55

Today there are 72 designated fusionin centers the U.S. (one in each state and 22 in major urban areas.

So where does The Department of Fatherland Security, I mean The Department of Homeland Security keep the comments from this blog? The fusionin center in Arizona or the fusionin center where the comment originated?

Well it is the government, so they probably keep them in the fusionin centers from where they were sent and then spend millions of dollars to figure out that they all went to this blog that is run by a dude in Arizona.

Comment by CharlieTango
2013-05-23 06:13:46

But Polly says the govt agencies are underfunded and can’t afford databases like, Google.

BTW One of my servers comes from Amazon and is free to anyone that wants one. It comes preconfigured with mySQL and can store millions of records with ease. You don’t have to be well funded to have a db.

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 06:33:34

DHS Fusion Centers Spend Much, Learn Little, Mislead a Lot

Wednesday, 03 October 2012 16:20

There is no telling how much taxpayer money was spent in preparing the fusion reports, since Congress has created such a complicated, multi-sourced grant process that even Department of Homeland Security officials don’t know how much money they have received and spent on the centers. The fusion centers are under the authority of the DHS, but are funded mainly by grants to local governments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Senate panel estimated that somewhere between $289 million and $1.4 billion in federal appropriations were spent on the fusion centers between 2003 and 2011. Federal spending accounts for 20 to 30 percent of the costs of operating the fusion centers, the report said, with the remaining 70 to 80 percent funded by state and local governments.

Whatever the total dollar amount is, the fusion centers have had enough money to spend heavily on data-mining software, flat-screen televisions and, in Arizona, two fully equipped Chevrolet Tahoes that are used for commuting, investigators found. Though the millions, or possibly billions, spent on the fusion centers has produced little of value, according to the report, Congress is unlikely to cut off or even reduce funding for the program. Its effectiveness, or lack thereof, in uncovering terrorist threats might be less important to members than the politically rewarding effects of sending all that money home to state and local law enforcement agencies.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/13097-dhs-fusion-centers-spend-much-learn-little-mislead-a-lot - 51k

Comment by MacBeth
2013-05-23 07:23:27

With any luck, we have a few hoards of rogue DHS employees who spend our money of frivolous nonsense like televisions and $50,000 vehicles.

Every dollar the DHS spends in such manners is a dollar put to better use than tracking everything non-conformist says or does on an hourly basis.

Would you not agree?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by uncle sugar
2013-05-23 08:10:49

FEMA Corps, because it’s “for the children”

http://www.fema.gov/fema-corps

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 08:44:17

50k would be cheap for a DHS vehicle. All the DHS, Secret Service, and FBI trucks I see around DC are heavy-duty Expedition/Tahoe types with every option and alot [sic] of expensive add-ons. None of them appear to be more than 2-3 yrs old at the very most.

In other words, DHS vehicles cost alot [sic] more than 50k. Even Amtrak cops get better trucks than 50k.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-05-23 11:00:26

They are most likely armored as well. Add another 50k to the cost.

 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2013-05-23 07:31:52

‘The Senate panel estimated that somewhere between $289 million and $1.4 billion in federal appropriations were spent on the fusion centers between 2003 and 2011. ‘

For that money they could of hired some psychics and remote viewers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ibbots
2013-05-23 06:51:33

That’s a lot of internet porn.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-05-23 20:51:44

This is why you need to use the Tor Browser.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 06:52:27

MSM commentators are acting as though Bernanke somehow slipped up yesterday, thereby failing to keep the stock market propped up on a permanently high plateau.

Haven’t these peops ever heard about the Fed’s role of taking away the punchbowl before the party gets out of control?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 06:56:49

Investor Alert Global stock markets in sharp retreat

May 22, 2013, 10:30 a.m. EDT
Brian Battle: Fed painted into a corner?
Stories You Might Like
How Bernanke blew it
Bernanke out by August, QE ends, rates up: Crash
Bernanke: ‘Step down’ in QE could come soon

As Fed chief Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill, Brian Battle of Performance Trust Capital Partners joins Jim Asendio for MarketWatch Stock Talk.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 08:12:31

Investor Alert
Global stock markets in sharp retreat

The Tell
The Markets News and Analysis Blog
Bernanke for dummies: Some keys to help decipher the chairman’s message
May 23, 2013, 11:03 AM

In the wake of the market’s whipsaw reaction to comments from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday, here are some keys to decipher the Fed’s message.

1. Tightening and tapering are different animals.

2. No danger of tapering in June.

3. Stock versus flow

This is the big enchilada. If you grasp this, you will see why the markets and the Fed can’t seem to communicate. The Fed thinks that what matters most about their bond purchases is the total amount of securities that the Fed has removed from the market and is holding on its balance sheet. The central bank thinks it is important how long the market thinks it will hold on to the securities. This is the “stock” of asset purchases.

But for the market, it is not just the total amount on the balance sheet, but the Fed’s ongoing presence in the market and the pace of the monthly purchases — or the flow.

“The Fed can be forgiven for wanting to believe there is no flow effect; it would be an uncomfortable admission that they are a bit trapped by QE and the balance sheet might get a lot larger than they are currently comfortable with,” said Julia Coronado, an economist at BNP Paribas.

“We hope the Fed is right that clearer communication can smooth the process of policy normalization, and we desperately hope they can deliver clarity in their communication soon,” she said.

– Greg Robb

Comment by measton
2013-05-23 08:42:58

The FED has to keep everyone guessing. That’s what gives it credibility. I suspect that behind closed doors they aknowledge the fact that it’s QE for the next 5-10 years. They might throw a few bumps in for show and to let those in the know make a little scratch.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 08:17:35

Whad’ya know: The slightest hint the Fed may soon taper QE3 is as devastating to the Japanese market as the March 2011 tsunami was.

May 23, 2013, 11:03 a.m. EDT
Treasurys benefit from flight-to-safety bid
By Ben Eisen, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Treasurys were beneficiaries of investors’ flight to safety on Thursday as global stock markets posted sharp losses, but lost most of their gains as the day wore on.

U.S. government bond prices rose, pushing the yield on the 10-year note (10_YEAR -0.39%) down 1 basis point to 2.033%, and helping the benchmark debt recoup a small part of its 10-basis-point loss on Wednesday.

Concern the Federal Reserve is poised to reduce its program to stimulate the U.S. economy hit European financial markets hard after causing turmoil in Asia. A flight to haven assets lifted gold and German Bunds at the expense of riskier assets like stocks and industrial metals.

The 30-year bond (30_YEAR -0.16%) yield fell 1 basis point to 3.215% while the 5-year note (5_YEAR -0.77%) yield fell 0.5 basis point to 0.897%.

The global stock selloff and resulting rally in Treasurys illustrate that the conflicting message of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke Wednesday continues to ripple through the markets. Bernanke indicated that the Fed could begin to taper its bond-purchase program in its next few meetings if the economic outlook continues to improve. That pushed up bond yields.

“The market doesn’t know whether to pare back Bernanke’s warning,” said Richard Gilhooly, U.S. director of interest-rate strategy at TD Securities.

The rise in Treasurys began on the heels of the largest drop in the Nikkei 225 index (JP:NIK -7.32%) since March 2011, when an earthquake and tsunami hit Japan. The Nikkei swung wildly Thursday amid ongoing uncertainty over Bernanke’s comments, combined with an unexpected contraction in Chinese manufacturing.

Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 09:02:20

“hot Money ” I wonder if most of the last few years gains in housing and stocks is all “hot Money” from uncle sugar ?

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:04:16

Gold bugs to markets: “Rumors of my untimely demise are greatly exaggerated.”

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:05:12

INVESTOR ALERT Global stock markets in sharp retreat

Currencies Futures Metals Stocks
May 22, 2013, 10:43 a.m. EDT
Gold will not make a comeback
Commentary: There may be a bounce, but don’t expect a recovery
Stories You Might Like
Don’t be fooled: Gold is no currency
By Jeff Reeves

Gold has been getting hammered the last week or two, pushing below $1,400 and threatening to retest the low mark of $1,322 set intraday in mid-April.

But since gold bounced big off that low — about 12% in just several trading days — some swing traders are starting to wonder if this could be an opportunity to snag a quick double-digit gain on another rebound off the bottom.

Or if you believe Peter Shiff, a rather modest 260% gain from here.

Don’t believe any of it.

Yes, the charts hint the worst may be over in the short term, as gold appears to be making a double bottom. And there remains decent demand from buyers of coins and jewelry — particularly in Asia. But it will take much more than necklaces and conspiracy theories to get gold back to the $1,500 range anytime soon.

The sellers are simply swamping the buyers, and there are no two ways about it.

You see, gold’s meteoric rise a while back was a perfect storm of factors fueling demand:

•Global investors went “risk off” as the financial crisis took hold and gutted the market.

•At home, excessive easing from the Federal Reserve prompted concerns about a devalued dollar and significant inflation.

•Abroad, EU fiscal woes called the viability of Europe’s currency into question.

•Wealthy emerging markets like China and India saw strong physical demand, as well as foreign central banks.

•ETFs like the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD +1.35%) allowing easy access to this momentum trade.

The result was gold prices tripling in about five years from the low $600s to start 2007 to a peak of around $1,900 in September 2011.

But of all those factors behind gold’s rise, the only one that truly remains is the Asian demand story — demand which, by the way, has been fueled by the recent precipitous drop in gold prices. Bargain hunting is hardly a sign of rabid demand and upside potential, even if it does provide a floor.

While gold bugs and conspiracy theorists will continue to make the evil eye at Ben Bernanke, the Fed/fear/FX trifecta has fallen apart. The dollar is strong and inflation is tame – and oh, by the way, we just got wind that the Fed may be mapping an exit from stimulus efforts in the next year or so.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:15:02

What’s the difference between saying an asset class is “in a bubble” and saying it is greatly overvalued?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:17:52

May 22, 2013, 2:41 P.M. ET
Pimco’s Gross: Treasuries Not In A Bubble, But Stocks Frothy
By Michael Aneiro

Appearing on CNBC just now to parse the latest Fed minutes, Pimco‘s Bill Gross was asked a direct question about what he sees as the most overvalued asset out there right now. Gross names both Treasuries and Japanese government bonds. He said he sees more overvaluation in 30-year Treasuries than in 5-year Treasuries, but that there’s “not a bubble in Treasuries.”

Pressed further on the subject of stocks by CNBC host Brian Sullivan, Gross said stocks are “not in a bubble but certainly frothy” and closed out his comments by conceding that stocks could be considered “mildly bubble-ish.”

Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 09:07:45

Is there enough demand in the markets to push rates up ?

seems like the FED / government has to go to extreme measures just to get regular people to borrow money these days.

half the population is not credit qualified without special government deals like 3% down or no down.

6 year car loans , etc.

The other half is borrowing to speculate.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-05-23 16:01:26

Bubble is when people buy with debt, and when it pops they have no chance of paying back what they owe and they go BK.
Overvalued is when people buy it with real money lying around. If the price goes down, people might be mad but since they don’t owe any money, there isn’t the same damage.

Housing was in a bubble.
Beanie babies were overvalued.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 16:10:10

“Bubble is when people buy with debt, and when it pops they have no chance of paying back what they owe and they go BK.”

You borrowed an inflated amount for a depreciating asset, a house in this case, in 2012 correct?

You’re one of them.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:25:34

Despite all the upheaval in the financial asset markets, at least U.S. home sales are still holding up strong.

Home sales continue to climb
By Chris Isidore @CNNMoney May 22, 2013: 10:34 AM ET
Home sales continued to climb in April.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
Home sales continued to climb in April, according to the latest reading on the housing recovery from an industry trade group.

The National Association of Realtors reported home sales edged up 0.6% to an annual pace of just under 5 million homes. Compared to a year ago, the pace of sales was up nearly 10%.

The pace of sales would have exceeded that level were it not for tight credit and insufficient houses for sale to meet rising demand, the group said.

“Without these frictions, existing-home sales easily would be well above the 5-million unit pace,” said Lawrence Yun, the Realtors’ chief economist. He said that customer traffic is up 31% compared to a year ago, showing greater demand than actual sales.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 07:26:05

Dow’s down 50. And this is a panic sell off? Ohhh kay!

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:29:49

How long is the wait time at Applebees these days, Eddie?

Comment by Michael Viking
2013-05-23 07:42:02

How long is the wait time at Applebees these days

I’ve eaten there once in my life so I don’t know the wait time around here, but last Thursday around 5:30 PM I was stopped at a light and was right next to the Applebee’s. Since I hear about this restaurant so much on this blog I thought I’d survey their parking lot. There was only one free space. To me that means it was probably busy.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:43:32

It was busy, all right, because most folks don’t have enough spare cash these days to eat at a nice restaurant.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-23 08:48:24

They have a 2-for-1 happy hour.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 09:13:26

Because you need to be drunk for their food to taste good?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-23 19:05:09

Because you need to be drunk for their food to taste good?

No, it’s still terrible when you’re drunk. The key is to drink so much you forget to eat.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:33:30

Too late now to “sell in May and go away”?

Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-05-23 15:54:07

Is it too late today to “go all in” on the Nikkei? After a 7+% drop, it’s sure to snap back given the complete reversal in the DOW today.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 22:02:53

Why buy today when you can get in for another 3%+ less tomorrow?

Latest News
12:46a Nikkei Average falls below 14,000
12:43a BREAKING Japan’s Nikkei Average diving sharply, down 3.2%
12:40a BREAKING Japan’s Nikkei Average extends loss, down 2.3%
12:35a BREAKING Japan stocks slip into losses after Kuroda remarks
12:26a BREAKING U.S. dollar down further vs. yen, at ¥101.17
12:19a BREAKING Nikkei Average drops 0.2% to 14,452.31
12:18a BREAKING Nikkei slides into losses after Kuroda remarks
12:10a Japan bonds stability ‘extremely desirable’:Kuroda
11:58p BREAKING Nikkei sharply pares gains after BOJ chief remarks
11:58p Nikkei up 0.4%, after rising more than 3% earlier
11:57p U.S. dollar slips below ¥102 level, at ¥101.77
11:01p Japan’s Abe reiterates commitment to reforms
10:57p Japan stocks recover modestly after steep sell-off

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 22:06:24

May 23, 2013, 1:36 p.m. EDT
Market carnage underlines dangers of overcrowding
By William L. Watts, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Japan’s stock market plunge, a sharp rebound by the yen, and even the temporary whack taken by major U.S. indexes on Thursday all help demonstrate what happens when trades get too crowded.

“Whenever one market becomes very crowded, that’s usually when the music ends,” said Adam Sarhan, chief executive at Sarhan Capital.

Since last fall, traders have been playing dollar/yen (USDJPY -0.35%) as though it were effectively a one-way bet. The dollar earlier this week pushed above ¥103 for the first time since October 2008, and even with Thursday’s 1.6% decline remains up more than 17% versus the yen year-to-date.

Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 Index (JP:NIK -3.14%) rose more than 70% from its 2012 lows and remains up nearly 67% since November even after Thursday’s drop.

It all comes down to quantitative easing. The yen plunge and Nikkei rally took on the qualities of a force of nature as Shinzo Abe led his party to victory in parliamentary elections last fall, pledging to force the Bank of Japan to aggressively fight deflation and promising fiscal action as well.

In April, the Bank of Japan announced a massive ramping up of its quantitative-easing program, accelerating the yen’s decline. Japanese stocks rallied, in turn, partly on expectations a weaker yen would aid exporters.

The aggressive Bank of Japan moves also fed into the notion of a global hunt for yield, with traders jumping into an array of so-called risky assets on expectations Japan’s efforts would force the nation’s investors to look outside Japan for returns.

But the catalyst for Thursday’s drop came from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who a day earlier had surprised investors by indicating the central bank could conceivably move to start paring back its own asset-buying program in coming months if the economy begins to improve.

The tone was only reinforced after minutes from the Fed’s latest meeting showed some policy makers were open to tapering the bank’s asset-buying program as early as June.

That knocked U.S. markets down Wednesday and set the plate for Thursday’s Nikkei rout and yen carnage, along with a rise in Japanese government bond yields. Throw in weak Chinese data and the stage was set for trouble in Tokyo.

Adam Cole, head of G-10 FX strategy at RBC Capital Markets in London, said it was “capitulation in to seriously crowded trades” that dominated price action.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 07:42:15

Wuz out for a stroll yesterday morning while visiting an area north of SD and came across this home which obviously was abandoned. I memorized the address out of curiosity over what Zillow would say it was “worth.”

The story on Zillow is pretty laughable. The home last sold for barely north of $600K in July 2007, the very month when Zillow sez it was “worth” $885K. And it went on the market late last year for $400K with no sale, even though the Zilldoes say it is now “worth” $501K. I guess pimping overpriced homes ain’t all that any more…

Zestimates
Value Range 30-day change $/sqft Last updated
Zestimate $501,246 $391K – $722K +$10,615 $176 05/21/2013
Rent Zestimate $2,287/mo $1.6K – $2.7K/mo +$38 $0.81 05/13/2013

Price History

Date Description Price Change $/sqft Source
12/08/2012 Listing removed $400,000 – $141 LETICIA JIMENEZ
11/02/2012 Listed for sale $400,000 -35.1% $141 LETICIA JIMENEZ
07/27/2007 Sold $616,500 23.5% $217 Public Record
05/24/2005 Sold $499,000 31.3% $176 Public Record
11/21/2002 Sold $380,000 – $134 Public Record

Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 09:12:10

it could be in a short sale standoff ? Second mortgage wanting more from the first and a forclosure around the corner ?

Just a guess ? San Diego is not Victorville after all

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 20:17:26

It’s at Lake Arrowhead.

 
 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-05-23 16:02:07

The fact that Zillow says it’s “worth” $885k today, and it sold for $380k in 2002, provides everything anyone needs to know when wondering whether we are currently in a real estate bubble.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 16:14:48

Exactly.

And $134 a square foot back then was over the top inflated. Even today that price is more than double construction costs plus profit.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 20:19:20

Actually they said it was worth $885K back in July 2007, when it mysteriously only sold for $616,500.

And though it wouldn’t sell for $400K last December, Zillow now claims it is “worth” over $500K.

Conclusion: ZILLOW ZUCKS.

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-24 00:03:54

Whac,

If you’re online tomorrow (24) noon-ish, reddit is hosting an “Ask Me Anything” with the hosts of “Let’s talk bitcoin”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 08:20:10

When China catches cold, the rest of the tightly-interconnected global economy is certain to come down with pneumonia.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-23 08:34:13

It will certainly hurt commodity producers such as Oz and Brazil.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-05-23 09:18:32

It will certainly hurt commodity producers such as Oz and Brazil.

China’s hard landing would hit Brazil very hard but Brazil needs to concentrate more on domestic growth too.

Comment by MightyMike
2013-05-23 10:46:22

I saw this today:

BRICS risk ’sudden stop’ as dollar rally builds

from the article:

Brazil has not yet lost its halo but it has all the signs of stagflation, and remains stuck where it has been for half a century in the “middle income trap”. Manufacturing output is lower today than in 2008, more like Italy than China. It is the result of an over-mighty real during the iron ore and agro-boom, and a bad case of the “resource curse”.

Fiscal policy was too loose, countered by tight money, so the real soared. Dilma Rousseff’s government tried to blame others with talk of “currency war”. Now it is dabbling in protectionism. We have seen this story before in Latin America.

Brazil’s global ranking is 107 for infrastructure, 123 for roads, and 135 for ports, according to the World Economic Forum. The country never really overcame its bad habits. And much the same could be said of Russia, another resourse casualty that bet too heavily on oil and gas in the shale-shaken energy universe.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/10074737/BRICS-risk-sudden-stop-as-dollar-rally-builds.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 21:56:17

Pretty soon, there will be BRICS falling out of the sky.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 08:21:06

May 23, 2013, 9:35 am EDT

China PMI Hints Again at Hard Landing
With manufacturing officially in contraction, Asia stocks are reeling

For the first time in seven months, China manufacturing is shrinking — and that has investors running for the exit in Asian stocks and other companies with Chinese exposure.

 
Comment by cactus
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 09:21:38

http://www.lpsvcs.com/LPSCorporateInformation/NewsRoom/Pages/20130522.aspx

Delinquencies falling, I’m wondering where they are going…is there an uptick in short sales or foreclosure completions? Or are rising prices allowing some people to simply sell their home to pay off the debt in full?

Full report supposedly in the first week in June.

Delinquencies of 30-90 days (one or two missed payments) now appear to be very close to “normal” at about 3.5% of loans.

Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 09:38:44

Delinquencies falling”

the Bernake plan is working.

The economy is so complex I would hate to screw around with it like the central Banks of the world are doing.

But I didn’t go to an Ivy League school so what do I know ?

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 10:00:19

What would have happened absent the Bernake plan?

The economy would have shed more jobs (every refinance at Fed-induced low rates gave somebody a permanent reduction in their costs of shelter–a lot of this money ended up back in the economy), and prices would have fallen further (fewer jobs means fewer people who can afford to pay for their own shelter).

But at the end of the day, we would have seen the same thing…prices firming up with cash buyers, most likely at a lower level, and eventually delinquencies would have fallen, most likely later.

What is the value of that benefit? Very hard to say (permanently scarred new depression generation? permanently damaged job/capital markets?).
What is the cost of that benefit? We don’t know yet entirely (inflation?).

 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-05-23 11:03:29

Or are rising prices allowing some people to simply sell their home to pay off the debt in full? refinance to 3.8% fixed.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 12:12:56

You’re quoting an outfit where the CEO is a convicted felon and con artist.

This is the type of company you keep. Criminals. And you’re no more trustworthy than your company.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-05-23 09:29:21

Some of today’s housing headlines:

Housing Off to Solid Spring
Wall Street Journal-16 hours ago
The report brought several new signs that the housing market is well on its way to recovery from the housing bust. Homes sold in April were on

Manatee County house sells in 17 minutes. The market’s that hot.
Bradenton Herald-12 hours ago

Housing market balancing out
Schenectady Gazette (blog)-22 hours ago

South Florida’s existing home prices jump by double digits from year …
In-Depth
-MiamiHerald.com-18 hours ago

Median home price hits all-time high
Blog
-Houston Chronicle (blog)-May 21, 2013

Frantic housing market recalls boom times in battered Florida Modesto Bee-4 hours ago
With the peak buying season in full swing, South Florida’s housing market is on fire. Real estate agents complain about needing more to sell.

Flaherty Says Doesn’t See a Bubble in Canadian Housing Market
Bloomberg-14 hours ago
“There’s been some beneficial effect in the retail housing market, particularly the condominium market,” Flaherty told a committee of senators in …

San Antonio’s housing market gaining strength
San Antonio Business Journal (blog)-15 hours ago
Houston-based Metrostudy, a leading residential research firm, has released its latest newsletter highlighting San Antonio’s housing market.

Luxembourg Housing Market Sours
NuWire Investor-1 hour ago
Data show that Luxembourg’s residential real estate market has had a good run over the past three years, but the latest numbers show that …

Better Chicago housing market getting sellers off the fence
Chicago Tribune-13 hours ago
Forty percent fewer homes were available for sale in the nine-county Chicago area in April than a year ago, leading to higher sales prices. That …

Why the Housing Market Won’t Drive the Recovery
CNBC.com-4 hours ago
Those who keep close track of the ins and outs of the housing market know the names of Case and Shiller for the monthly home price index …

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-23 09:52:36

‘Manatee County house sells in 17 minutes’

And now, for the rest of the story:

‘Given the trends and upward pressure on prices, it looks like Manatee County and the entire state has become a seller’s market. “Sellers received over 93 percent of their original listing price in April, whether they were selling a single-family home or a condo,” Asher said.’

http://www.bradenton.com/2013/05/23/4536995/manatee-county-house-sells-in.html#storylink=cpy

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-05-23 10:00:07

And now, for the rest of the story:

continued:
“…….Atkinson said you can thank — or blame — Manatee County’s hot housing market on groups of investors who are watching listings for existing home sales like hawks.

The driving up of prices for single-family homes is causing an issue for first-time homebuyers, she said.

The investors pay a high price with cash, eliminating much of their competition.

“They are coming in and scooping up a lot of existing inventory, really making it hard for a first-time homebuyer, who needs financing and has to have a mortgage,” Atkinson said.

The investors typically perform minimal housing renovations and rent out the properties, making it even more vital for vacation renters to do their research on any rental, she added.”

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-23 10:02:37

‘May 20 (Reuters) - Mexico’s third-largest homebuilder, Urbi Desarrollos, on Monday said it will not meet a $6.4 million interest payment due since last month. The company, like its larger rivals Geo and Homex , has been struggling to make debt payments amid a slump in home sales.’

http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20130520&id=16498852

‘(Reuters) - Struggling with slowing home sales and a lack of liquidity, Mexico’s top three homebuilders may have to seek bankruptcy protection if they fail to reach an agreement with creditors in the short term. Analysts are sceptical that restructuring efforts will work, arguing that at least in the cases of Geo and Urbi, the companies will likely have to rely on protection under Mexico’s version of U.S. Chapter 11, known as Concurso Mercantil.’

“The homebuilders have a very heavy debt load … about 20 (percent) to 30 percent of their total debt, mostly bank debt, is due in the next 18 months,” said Marco Medina, an analyst at Ve por Mas. “They need a quick fix. They have limited time.”

‘Urbi already faces lawsuits seeking over $100 million in damages in the United States and Mexico over debt and bank derivative payments. Geo, too, is in trouble, having failed last month to meet interest payments on its local debt, potentially triggering a broader default on the 400 million pesos in principal it owes.’

http://www.iii.co.uk/news-opinion/reuters/news/93127

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 11:05:06

If I had a vacation property in Mexico I’d be putting it on the market about now. Anecdotal evidence suggests that Mexico is making it increasingly hard for American expats to get vehicles, small machinery and parts, personal goods and declared money, into and out of the country.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-23 12:00:02

The peso has been holding steady at ~12 to a dollar. If a crisis was imminent it would be in free fall.

That said, when the crisis does hit, foreigners will be blamed first.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:55:54

And don’t forget the important part of the story;

“Housing demand and housing ownership has fallen to multi decade lows.

Why?

Because housing prices are grossly inflated.

Why buy a house at these massively inflated prices when you can rent one for half the monthly cost?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-05-23 10:28:21

Don’t forget:

“New-Home Prices Hit High as Builders Limit Supply”
Courtesy of the WSJ:

A tidbit:

“In a May 13 client report, housing-research firm Zelman & Associates noted that 60% of builders questioned in a recent survey said they had intentionally slowed sales pace in at least one community in April.

Builders are focusing on pricing over sales volume in part because costs for land, labor and materials like lumber, concrete and drywall boards are rising. Land prices in particular have jumped because land developers—the companies that install sidewalks, pipes and other infrastructure—were largely dormant for most of the downturn, leading to a shortage of builder-ready lots.

Jonathan Jaffe, chief operating officer of Lennar Corp. the country’s third-largest builder by volume, told analysts in a March conference call that because of land shortages, Lennar is in many communities deliberately keeping its sales pace slow to “suppress it below what the market would demand.” As a result, “we are seeing more significant price increases,” Mr. Jaffe said.”

Sounds like the builders want to get in the manipulation action as well, but the problem does not appear to be demand.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:52:59

And don’t forget…. every one of us are profitable at $55 per square foot.

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 09:31:39

Why did Al Gore buy a house in Montecito which is near the ocean so global warming will flood it ?

You can walk to the ocean from this house, backs right off Olive mill rd

address is Old country lane ## if I remember right.

Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 11:10:38

It’s a conspiracy!

Comment by ecofeco
2013-05-23 13:30:24

Insidious!

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 11:13:26

Walk-to and beachfront are two different things — and in Montecito, two different elevations. Maybe he’s thinking strategically for the long term?

Also, who wants the noise and concussion from the constant pounding of the surf day in and day out? And guests tracking oil tar from the beach into your house….

Comment by tj
2013-05-23 11:29:38

Also, who wants the noise and concussion from the constant pounding of the surf day in and day out?

no concussion felt unless there was a storm surf. otherwise it’s very relaxing. i rented a place right on the beach. step out right on the sand. i opened the windows at night to better hear the surf. drowns out most other noises like barking dogs and traffic. nothing like falling asleep and waking up next to the ocean. but then, i love the water.. always have.

Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 12:08:24

Also, who wants the noise and concussion from the constant pounding of the surf day in and day out?

I do!

Except not if it means living in the fog zone.

Here in SF, houses (rent or buy) by the ocean are cheaper than other parts of the city because out there in the Spring and Summer you might not see the sun for weeks on end. Fog and wind, and then some more fog and wind.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 13:19:08

I lived on the sand (then on a seawall) for years. And yes, it’s lovely for about the first four of them. But at some point it becomes oppressive, almost demanding that you set your heart rate to the rhythms of the sea. And if you’re on a sea wall, or the sand gets too wet, the foundation transmits the concussion of the surf to the flooring.

What clinched it for me was what the humidity and corrosive salt air did to all my leather goods, books, and piano. Cracked mold city. And have you ever tried to keep crackers crisp in a kitchen-by-the-sea?

That said, this country would be a finer place is everyone spent a month of their life living alone on a winter beach.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tj
2013-05-23 13:39:54

i lived mostly on the ocean for 8 years (in different areas). never felt surf through the floor. don’t eat crackers so no problem there.

but you’re right, the salt air is a real problem. i only rented, so i didn’t have to do home repairs. but it gets into everything (even wiring) and destroys it over time. it gets under the paint on cars after a couple years. being inland even a few blocks lessens the problem. but right on the ocean.. the salt air is a killer. still, even with that problem, it was well worth it.

 
Comment by Beachchic
2013-05-23 16:51:01

Lived very close, within a few blocks, to the beach for 10 years, renting. I agree, the beach air is very corrosive and damp. It was very hard on my car too. I have lost the desire to live very close to the beach. Couldn’t afford to buy there anyway. I love the beach, but am okay driving a 1/2 hour to get to one.

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-05-23 17:26:13

Walk-to and beachfront are two different things”

you have to walk over the 101 so its not on the beach just close to it

I used to live in that house a long time ago before it had the pool added

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-24 00:17:13

Very cool, cactus. We’ve had the fine fortune to live in some amazing places over the years, neh?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 11:45:38

Selling Global Warming snake oil is very profitable.

Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 11:53:43

So is running radio programs for teabilly loons.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-05-23 13:29:18

*snerk* :lol:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-23 13:34:21

Win/win for everyone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2013-05-23 10:12:40

Some of the most expensive real estate in the WORLD??? Nothing to see here…..

Real estate prices’ increase in Rio and Sao Paulo among the highest in the world

http://en.mercopress.com/2013/04/02/real-estate-prices-increase-in-rio-and-sao-paulo-among-the-highest-in-the-world

The latest Knight Frank’s Global Real Estate Index released this month has Brazil ranking No. 3 in the world and No. 1 in the Americas for rising home prices. Only ridiculously expensive Hong Kong and Dubai, which are not countries, have seen prices rise more. So in fact, no single country has seen its housing prices increase as much as Brazil.

…Average price per square foot in São Paulo was 6,806 Real or around 3.403 dollars. Rio was even worse and has become the most expensive city in Brazil when consider square foot pricing. In Rio, it’s over 8,300 Real or around 4,000 dollars. In 2012 average price per square foot in New York City was 1.294 dollars.

But despite this spiraling of prices FIPE says there is no real estate bubble in Brazil.

By the popular US definition, Brazilian real estate is not in a bubble. Its banks do not trade in risky mortgage backed securities. Housing loans are not packaged up into sophisticated investment products for hedge funds and the bulge bracket banks to play around with. Moreover down-payments are actually required, unlike in the U.S. where sub-prime clients were able to get into a house with little or no money down, leading to a foreclosure crisis. Brazil is not even close to foreclosure crisis.

Strangely enough, despite the higher prices and red hot demand, many of Brazil’s real estate developers are struggling. Homebuilder Rossi Residential reported a 2012 loss of 206 million Real (102 million dollars) and PDG Realty did even worse, losing 2.17 billion Real, close to a billion dollars last year.

Rising material and labor costs are some of the reasons for the loss, though a lot of it seems inexplicable.

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-24 00:21:26

The silence here is deafening….

But the inexplicable certainly has much to do with the Olympics?

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-05-24 07:00:07

But the inexplicable certainly has much to do with the Olympics?

Any guesses as to what the _long_-term effects of the Olympics will be?

 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-05-23 10:13:38

So, the the Great Recession and the ensuing bailouts were a result of two factors:

1) Mixing of consumer deposits with a financial company’s gambling operations.

2) The ability of lenders to completely shed repayment risk. Which led to the curious situation of lenders making loans they didn’t care about having repaid.

Well, the government and financial sector knows this too. But there’s big money in prolonging the imploded system, for politicians and for the FIRE sector. So, below is a report on undermining Part 1 - separating consumer deposits from the financial company’s gambling operations - see below:

Volcker: Multiple Bank Regulators Is ‘Recipe for Getting Nothing Done’
Wall Street Journal
May 22, 2013, 3:22 PM
By David Wessel

Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, says the U.S. has too many agencies charged with the supervision and regulation of banks.

“It’s a recipe for getting nothing done,” he said at a forum at George Washington University inaugurating a scholarship in his name for law students pursuing careers in financial regulation.

“This really is a disaster,” Mr. Volcker said in an on-stage interview conducted by Donald Kohn, a former Fed vice chairman.

Mr. Volcker said he was particularly frustrated that three years after the passage of the Dodd-Frank law, regulators still haven’t agreed on a way to implement a still-controversial provision, known as “The Volcker Rule,” which is designed to force commercial banks to stay away from trading for their own accounts.

– “Realtime Economics”, Wall Street Journal

 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-05-23 10:25:33

And, in undermining Part 2 - Lenders being forced to retain repayment risk - we have the House Financial Services Committee “expressing concern” (i.e. totally rejecting) the Qualified Mortgage (QM) regulation which requires them to see if the lender can repay a loan, if they want to sell it to the government (note: FHA is drafting separate rules).

Loan originators are free to create loans any way they want but they can’t sell it to the government if they at avoid even cursory checking to see if it might be repaid. However, FHA could well insure the loan, as it has quite a high delinquency rate about which the government doesn’t seem to be too concerned about.

This is all just a scheme to transfer OPM to the FIRE sector in return for having a portion of it funneled back to the politicians.

They’re both hooked on the opium of OPM.

Members of the Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee expressed concerns at a hearing today that the Qualified Mortgage rule mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act will reduce access to credit that qualified borrowers need to buy homes.

Banks and credit unions have already pulled back on extending mortgage credit and have tightened underwriting standards in response to the financial crisis. The Qualified Mortgage (QM) rule may well exacerbate this reduction in access to credit.

http://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=334810

Unsurprisingly, Chairman Hensarling gets the vast majority of his money from the FIRE sector, by a wide margin.

Jeb Hensarling money contributors: http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=2012&cid=N00024922&type=I

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 10:30:57

“Sales of new single-family homes rose 2.3% in April, and prices climbed to ***record high*** levels, offering strong proof the sector’s rebound trend is intact. The Commerce Department said on Thursday sales increased to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 454,000 units. Economists polled by Reuters had expected sales to rise to 425,000-unit rate last month.

The median sales price for a new home was $271,600, up 14.9% from a year ago, and the ***highest on record*** since the Commerce Department began tracking the data in the early 1960s. Home prices are rising across the country and are helping consumers and the economy.”

Oh but I know, I know housing demand is off by 1000% according to Housing Analyst.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:28:06

No.

Housing demand is at 1997 levels which is roughly a 50% decline. Why?
Because asking prices of resale housing are massively inflated.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 11:37:45

HA HA HA. Demand is 50% off yet price is at a record high. If nothing else you are consistently amusing.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:48:14

Refute it Slithers. You know housing demand is at 1997 levels and ownership has fallen to 1996 levels.

Refute it. You won’t because you can’t. You can’t because it’s the truth.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 11:52:31

You’re right. Prices are at an all time high because demand is at an all time low. You’ve discovered the top secret alternate supply and demand theory that nobody else knows about. It goes like this…as demand falls, price increases. You should call the Nobel people, I think you might be in line for a prize.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:57:15

Refute it.

You won’t because you can’t. You can’t because it’s the truth.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-23 13:39:24

Demand is 50% off yet price is at a record high.

You say that like it’s not possible. All that’s required is a severe (probably artificial) restriction in supply for both to be true.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 15:07:32

“You say that like it’s not possible. All that’s required is a severe (probably artificial) restriction in supply for both to be true.”

Sales increased 29% YOY. That’s a result of increased demand, not restricted supply.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 15:50:06

And we’ll continue to build and over supplying the market with new inventory until resale prices are driven in the ground.

 
Comment by mathguy
2013-05-23 16:01:10

Housing:
(Genuinely curious)
How many new units *have* you guys put out in the past 6 months? Any idea what rate your industry is putting out houses vs household rate of formation? What kinds of market analysis are you doing, or do you have enough demand that you don’t have to worry about it for the time being?

Thanks in advance…

mathguy

 
 
 
 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 12:26:47

My pal from Portland just informed me that she closed on a house (sight unseen) in SF.

I want to tell her she made a big mistake, but the deed has already been done and she says the rain in the Pacific northwest was making her suicidal.

I also told her that she should rent and wait for this mania to pass. Turns out that finding a rental is just as difficult as buying a house. Currently there are only 3 3BR places for rent for under 3K month (that allow cats), and they are all in sketchy neighborhoods.

Bummer all around…

Comment by ecofeco
2013-05-23 13:23:15

I wonder what it’s like to have that much stupid money?

Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 14:24:29

I wonder what it’s like to have that much stupid money?

Inherited money is generally a lot stupider than earned money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 15:00:09

And you had neither…. LOL

Now you’re stuck with a depreciate, rotting shack and an $800k debt burden.

 
Comment by sfhomowner
2013-05-23 15:09:47

$800k debt burden.

You pulled that number out of your a$$.

Even if I took 30 years to pay off my house (which it won’t), it still doesn’t even come close to 800K. Not even close.

What’s your problem, anyway?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 15:14:24

Close? It’s right on. Add in your taxes, insurance and maintenance.

Now you’re well over 1.3 million on a depreciating ghetto shack.

Brilliant.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 10:42:37

Guys, I found a picture of 2Banana’s car/bumper sticker: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BDlYlH3CYAAK5pk.jpg:large

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 13:06:04

Ohio plates, reminds us of when we lived in Cincinnati, in Jean Schmidt’s (”marines don’t cut and run”) Congressional District.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 15:19:05

Whose was Ronald “Regan”?

Comment by CharlieTango
2013-05-23 17:52:33

Whose was Ronald “Regan”?

He was our cat.

 
 
 
Comment by Bubbabear
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 11:11:15

** pops popcorn **

** waits for RentalWatch and RAL to battle **

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:35:41

With 4 million excess, empty, defaulted and delinquent houses and mortgages in California, this is no surprise.

Seriously folks…… Why would a 20+year old house cost more than a brand new house?

*THINK*

Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 16:57:06

That used house smell?

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 11:09:29

The Plunge Protection Team did a great job of rescuing Wall Street bacon today…

 
Comment by michael
2013-05-23 11:26:18

http://www.oftwominds.com/blog.html

debt financed wealth redistribution without representation.

gen x take it back from the boomers…lolz.

why worry about that when they can just saddle those too young to vote or even the yet to be born with even more debt.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 11:50:26

I wonder if having a gun would have helped this woman? Nah. I’m constantly told by my liberal betters that guns are bad and gun free zones are the way to go since NOBODY ever deters criminals with a gun.

JOSEPHINE COUNTY, Ore. (CBS Seattle) — An Oregon woman was told by a 911 dispatcher that authorities wouldn’t be able be able to help her as her ex-boyfriend broke into her place because of budget cuts.

Oregon Public Radio reports that an unidentified woman called 911 during a weekend in August 2012 while Michael Bellah was breaking into her place. Her call was forwarded to Oregon State Police because of lay-offs at the Josephine County Sheriff’s Office only allows the department to be open Monday through Friday. “Uh, I don’t have anybody to send out there,” the 911 dispatcher told the woman. “You know, obviously, if he comes inside the residence and assaults you, can you ask him to go away? Do you know if he’s intoxicated or anything?…….Police say Bellah choked the woman and sexually assaulted her. He was arrested by Oregon State Police following the incident.”

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 11:55:26

When seconds count the police is only 30 minutes away, finishing their their cream filled donuts. Just hold on and see if you can ask the rapist to pretty please go away. I’m sure he’ll listen to you. Under no circumstances however should you have a gun in the home. Only right wing lunatics own those icky things.

Comment by goon squad
2013-05-23 13:11:13

That’s racis.

We found some 7.62×39 linked off gunbot dot net last weekend and ordered 200 at a cost of $0.365 per round including shipping.

More than WalMart, but WalMart never has any in stock.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-05-23 13:21:16

The reason police are multiple minutes away is because some people think less cops = less government = better and therefore voted to cut funds.

Funny how that works, isn’t it?

I call it the “Benghazi Effect”. Cut the funds and blame others.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 15:09:16

“I call it the “Benghazi Effect”. Cut the funds and blame others.”

The Benghazi Effect would mean the police chief calls the patrol guys and tells them to stand down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 15:34:33

“The Benghazi Effect would mean the police chief calls the patrol guys and tells them to stand down.”

:)

Then sends someone out on the Sunday talk shows and blames the attack the police couldn’t respond to on a video that was never viewed by anyone.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 15:10:22

So let’s say liberals got their wet dream and spent an unlimited amount of money. Are you saying the police would be at your door in under 60 seconds?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 15:13:39

Did you notice where this story is from? Oregon, the Democratic People’s Republic that has been controlled by Democrats forever. Democrats hold the house, the senate, the governor and the state treasurer.

But lack of funding for the police is the Republicans’ fault in a state run by and for Democrats.

Amazing.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-05-23 16:59:08

All of you zealots are immune to logic. You should embrace your far left brethren, and celebrate your shared mental illness.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 11:51:11

Why are there so many lawyers(sounds like ‘liars’) posting on The Housing Bubble Blog?

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that its immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-05-23 12:42:29

Two is not alot [sic].

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 15:02:21

You’re forgetting a few my harpsichordist friend.

 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-23 12:02:15

What happens when a liberal Democrat president runs a car company that employs unionized workers to build the cars?

The wheels literally fall off.

CHICAGO, May 22 (Xinhua) — General Motors Corporation said it is recalling nearly 20,000 new Cadillac SRX SUVs for faulty wheel lug nuts, according to a Detroit News report on Wednesday. The Detroit automaker told the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration it is recalling 18,871 2013 SRX SUVs in the United States and nearly 1,000 in Canada over concerns that a wheel could eventually fall off.

GM has been investigating the issue of loosening wheel nuts since October 2012. In March and April, GM received six reports for noise and other issues caused by loose lug nuts. But according to GM spokesman Alan Adler, the automaker has no reports of wheels falling off.”

Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-23 20:13:40

Wouldn’t it be funny of those lug nuts were made by non union workers in China?

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-23 12:04:48

“Why pay a massively inflated price for depreciating asset like a house for which your costs double due to financing?

Comment by Resistor
2013-05-23 16:31:37

I was thinking about this the other day. If you told someone that you took out a loan for a pack of gum, they would laugh and think you’re crazy.

And yet, taking out a loan for the MOST EXPENSIVE thing you can buy… is normal?

 
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 15:53:19

Red Bone - Redbone - Come and Get Your Loan - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7eloXr2iak - 223k -

 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 16:26:24

The Outlaws - Green Grass and High Tides (Lyrics) - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boR0mqkFDic - 213k -

Green grass and high tides forever

or

Free homes and Deadbeats forever

In a place you only dream of
Where your house is always free
Silver stages, golden curtains
Filled my head, plain as can be
As a rainbow grew around the sun
All the stars above who died came from
Somewhere beyond the scene you see
These lovely people paid just for me

Now if I let you see this place
Where sob stories all ring true
Will you let me past your face
To see what’s really you
It’s not for me I ask this question
As though I were a king
For you have to stop paying, believe, and whine
Before the burst of bailouts can take you there

Free homes and Deadbeats forever
Castles of stone, souls and glory
Loan papers say we adore you
As taxpayers bow and pay for you

Those who don’t believe me
Find your loans and let them see
Those who do, believe and know
We’ll always live for free
Time and time again I’ve thanked them
For a peace of mind
That helped me find myself
And loan papers robo-signed
That enchants you there

Free homes and Deadbeats forever
Castles of stone, souls and glory
Loan papers say we adore you
As taxpayers bow and pay for you

Yeah, they pay just for you

 
Comment by Resistor
2013-05-23 16:36:58

Lovely:

The lady across the street, who finagled a free house from a dying old lady (after abandoning the one next to me), is now suing the penny-loafer/g-string guy because water from his sprinkler occasionally drifts into her yard depending on the wind.

 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-23 17:01:46

“We swear by Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you.”

My, that is troubling.

They need to put that dude in a cell with Jodi Arias and make him take a shower.

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-23 18:35:51

Now! On PayPerView!

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-05-23 22:09:51

I’m not sure who this “we” is anyway. It was him and one other dude, apparently on drugs, with a meat cleaver.

Trippy.

Now if it were me, I’d go all out and plan some sort of electricity attack. Fry everyone on a rainy day. But then it would just be “me” never stopping fighting against you, so it wouldn’t seem so cool. It would just seem like I was a jerk.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 22:08:09

May 23, 2013, 10:04 a.m. EDT
Mortgage rates rise for third straight week
By Steve Goldstein

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Mortgage rates rose for the third straight week, Freddie Mac reported Thursday. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 3.59% with an average 0.7 point for the week ending May 23, 2013, up from last week when it averaged 3.51%. The 15-year FRM this week averaged 2.77% with an average 0.7 point, up from last week when it averaged 2.69%. The 5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage averaged 2.63% with an average 0.5 point, up from last week when it averaged 2.62%. The 1-year Treasury-indexed ARM averaged 2.55% this week with an average 0.4 point, the same as last week. “Fixed-rates moved up for the third consecutive week, with the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage about a quarter-percentage point higher than three weeks ago. While this may slow some of the refinance momentum, rates are nonetheless low and home-buyer affordability high, which should further aid home sales and construction in coming weeks,” said Frank Nothaft, chief economist.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-23 22:11:18

May 23, 2013, 12:16 p.m. EDT
Bernanke to Congress: You’re killing us
Commentary: Fed chief tries to use bully pulpit one more time

“Fiscal policy at the federal level has become significantly more restrictive,” he said. “In particular, the expiration of the payroll tax cut, the enactment of tax increases, the effects of the budget caps on discretionary spending, the onset of the sequestration, and the declines in defense spending for overseas military operations are expected, collectively, to exert a substantial drag on the economy this year.”

The Fed chairman once again called on Congress to re-prioritize its deficit-cutting efforts to allow some fiscal stimulus in the short term and a more sustainable balance in the long term.

“The objectives of effectively addressing longer-term fiscal imbalances and of minimizing the near-term fiscal headwinds facing the economic recovery are not incompatible,” he said.

Let’s keep in mind that Bernanke is not a Democrat, liberal or otherwise. The former Princeton professor, who was appointed to the Fed by George W. Bush and briefly served as Bush’s chief economic adviser, has always been considered a Republican.

But he is first and foremost an economist, and for him the economics of our current situation are clear: High unemployment is our biggest problem and must be the primary target of policy.

“High rates of unemployment and underemployment are extraordinarily costly: Not only do they impose hardships on the affected individuals and their families, they also damage the productive potential of the economy,” Bernanke lectured lawmakers this week.

The best way to reduce the deficit, this economist made clear, is to put people back to work.

“The loss of output and earnings associated with high unemployment also reduces government revenues and increases spending on income-support programs, thereby leading to larger budget deficits and higher levels of public debt than would otherwise occur,” Bernanke said, not for the first time.

The Fed chairman’s admonitions to Congress came as lawmakers continued their chicanery over the federal budget.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post