May 25, 2013

Bits Bucket for May 25, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

167 Comments »

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-25 04:47:07

“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.”

Talk:Henry Kissinger - Wikiquote
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Henry_Kissinger - 28k -

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:42:33

Who trains disciples controls America.

Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.

– Henry Kissinger –

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:50:38

Geithner and Kissinger Associates–pt. 1

From Bob Feldman:

Treasury Secretary-Designate Geithner’s Kissinger Associates Background—Part 1

Between 1986 and 1989, U.S. Treasury Secretary Designate Timothy Geithner was employed at Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft, and Lawrence Eagleburger’s Kissinger Associates influence-peddling firm, which also employed George W. Bush’s former special envoy to Iraq, L. Paul Bremer, during the early 1990s. A leading candidate for Commerce Secretary, Bill Richardson, also is a former employee of Kissinger Associates.

An expose, titled “The ‘Kissinger Affair’: A Look At Henry Kissinger’s Kuwaiti Connection,” which appeared in the March 27, 1991 issue of a Lower East alternative newsweekly Downtown, began with the following quotation from the April 20, 1986 issue of the New York Times Magazine about Kissinger Associates, during the years that Treasury Secretary-Designate Geithner worked there:

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-25 07:49:56

He’s a nasty character. The locals don’t particularly care for him because of it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 17:41:36

Geithner’s Home Under Contract One Week After Listing
By John Gittelsohn - Mar 21, 2013 9:01 PM PT

Timothy F. Geithner, who finished his term as U.S. Treasury secretary in January, has found a buyer for his house in Bethesda, Maryland, just a week after listing the home for $995,000.

Geithner’s four-bedroom property on Ogden Road is under contract with some contingencies, but isn’t dependent on a buyer selling a current house to close the deal, according to the website of brokerage Redfin Corp. It was listed March 14.

The quick deal is a contrast to Geithner’s attempt to sell his home in New York’s Westchester County in 2009, which ended with him renting the house out. U.S. home demand is rebounding as employment improves and buyers seek to take advantage of low mortgage rates, while inventory is tight. In Bethesda, there’s about a 1.5-month supply of houses listed for sale, compared with a six-month supply in a normal market, according to Mark Butterfield, owner of Re/Max Realty Services in Bethesda.

“We have a shortage of inventory,” said Butterfield, who isn’t involved in Geithner’s home sale. “Multiple offers are very common. Good stuff sells quickly.”

Matthew Maury, the real estate agent for Geithner’s home, with Stuart & Maury Inc., declined to comment. Jenni LeCompte, Geithner’s spokeswoman, also declined to comment.

Geithner bought the home in August 2009 for $950,000, according to public records. Built in 1954, the 2,500-square- foot (232-square-meter) house has hardwood floors, a family room with a “soaring” ceiling, two recreation rooms and a deck that overlooks the backyard on the 10,000-square-foot lot, according to the listing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 17:44:42

If he paid $950K in 2009 and sold for $995K in 2013, it seems likely that there was an overall loss, unless he somehow avoided the 6% in round trip transaction costs (e.g. 6%*$950K = $57K).

Not that such a small loss on a home sale matters at this echelon of the socio-economic spectrum…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jose canusi
2013-05-25 05:04:39

Now, why are they showing me an ad above to watch a trailer of the Backstreet Boys? Was it because I mentioned on the blog that I posted to a fansite when I’d had a drop too much? Is it because I sometimes like to watch old music videos and clips of bands from the 1960s-1980s on YouTube? What? I’m so confused, sigh.

This just goes to show how bogus so much internet advertising is. Let’s see, off to the right is an ad for Beazer (love the name) homes, from the $160s, no less.

Some real “target” marketing there, lol. What a joke.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:12:18

What do I see?

Dodge Dart — MSRP starting at $15,995.

I get it…I bought too expensive of a car… I could be dining out more often, drinking more $10/bottle wine instead of my $5/bottle Trader Joe’s varietal, wife could be working less, etc., but I foolishly overpaid for personal transportation.

Comment by jose canusi
2013-05-25 05:32:29

Yeah, maybe they want me to get with the times and watch more of today’s musical “stars”, as opposed to living in the past with Jay and the Americans and Def Leppard.

Meh. When you read some of the plaintive comments on some of the YouTube videos of bands from the 1980s and earlier, posted by young folk 16 and under, it’s enuf to break your heart. They’re wondering why their music sucks so profusely.

If we’ve stolen their futures and trashed their education, the least we could do is give them some decent entertainment.

Justin Bieber, are you listening? Enough with the thug hip-hop.
Jeebus, I caught a clip of him being booed at that award show. He was dressed like a cross between a dominatrix and a barber. I would have booed him too, just on GPs.

Comment by talon
2013-05-25 08:05:13

“He was dressed like a cross between a dominatrix and a barber”

That sentence is likely going to get you a different set of ads on your screen…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by azdude
2013-05-25 05:47:06

have you ever tried the kirkland brand of wines?

Bogle is fairly decent for the price.

Caymus is a good wine but pricey.

Total wine is a good place to hunt for wine.

Comment by inchbyinch
2013-05-25 07:03:39

Vineyard real estate is hot in N Ca right now.
I predict a bubble in the near future.
My cousin is the VP of a vineyard real
estate brokerage and it’s going
gangbusters right now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 07:10:54

It can go gangbusters right until the moment when the Fed really takes away the punchbowl…

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-25 07:53:05

In New Zealand the type of property leading the foreclosure pack is houses in the country with land used to grow grapes. I don’t think they make wine, just add to the grape harvest. In China, they actually have a bubble bursting in bottled wine.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-05-25 08:24:39

Ben-
Interesting. Thanks.
Some REIT sectors are doing
quite well right now.
Dividend Detective has
a Directory by sector of
REITs. I’m using it in my job hunt.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-25 09:19:31

Chinese wine is so badly made I’m surprised it’s not bursting the actual bottles. But if they ever get it together, the country will be an industry powerhouse. Problem is, demand is low because very few people in PRC drink wine; much like the US was in the 50’s-60’s, they’re acculturated instead to beer and distilled saki — if anything.

Even the top restaurants don’t have a wine list. And spirits, when available, are literally doled out by the capful.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-25 09:43:59

‘domestic wine maker Dynasty Fine Wines Group (0828.HK) has issued a profit warning. But whereas my previous post talked about the big potential in the baijiu industry for high-alcohol spirits, my latest post is decidedly more downbeat and points to a big bubble starting to burst in the fast growing but increasingly crowded market for western-style grape-based wines.’

‘I’ve previously predicted this looming bubble was coming, as the rapid development of China’s wine industry follows a pattern often seen in other hot new sectors. That pattern often sees hundreds of new companies pile into these emerging sectors, leading to overheated competition and forcing everyone into the red.’

‘Dynasty’s status as one of China’s oldest and best known domestic wine makers is particularly noteworthy, as the fact that it is losing money means that nearly everyone else in the sector is probably also posting even bigger losses. Dynasty noted in the warning that its sales volume actually decreased last year compared with 2011, and that the company has suffered from both China’s weak economy and the waning appeal of domestic wines compared with imported rivals.’

‘Dynasty’s declining sales seem almost inevitable, reflecting the entry of so many new players into the market over the last two years. One analyst report estimated that sales of domestic wines grew just 4 per cent in 2012, while even imported wine sales grew a relatively modest 9 percent. Those numbers are down sharply over the strong double-digit growth of previous years, and the slowing growth certainly can’t support the entry of so many new players into the market.’

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-05-25 12:09:55

“Vineyard real estate is hot in N Ca right now. I predict a bubble in the near future.”

Where have you been? It’s been in a bubble for more than 10 years.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-05-25 14:24:51

united
Evidently under a rock or feeding
the squirrels and blue jays.
Love the competition for the
roasted peanuts.
Gotta love nature.

I’m not a wine snob,
unlike my family.
Yawn.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 18:44:44

I love Total Wine. When I am near one I usually get a supply of dealcoholized wine. For the real wines I got into French wines, mostly Bordeaux. Can’t afford the $80 and up ones so I go for the $10 ones. Besides, many of those above $30 with 90 and up ratings are “drinkable” rated in several years.

Southwest France has Merlots, Cabs, Malbecs (I did not know til recently) and I am now exploring those. They are lower cost than the Burgundys and Bordeaux.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by chilidoggg
2013-05-25 05:38:19

Mine is a box of Kashi cereal. I have no idea why.

Comment by inchbyinch
2013-05-25 07:05:10

Kashi is really Kelloggs.
It is their fake health food brand.

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-25 09:21:45

Puffed 4-way horse feed at 100x the price.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:01:06

I have Meritage Homes at the top and Lear Capital - “The Precious Metal Leaders” to the right.

 
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-25 05:08:51

“Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic -

May 1, 2013

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.

So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.

No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty (see map).

On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group.

The seed bank is being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault’s relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.

Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?

Anytime Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta get together on a common project, it’s worth digging a bit deeper behind the rocks on Spitsbergen. When we do we find some fascinating things.

The first notable point is who is sponsoring the doomsday seed vault. Here joining the Norwegians are, as noted, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the US agribusiness giant DuPont/Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the world’s largest owners of patented genetically-modified (GMO) plant seeds and related agrichemicals; Syngenta, the Swiss-based major GMO seed and agrichemicals company through its Syngenta Foundation; the Rockefeller Foundation, the private group who created the “gene revolution with over $100 million of seed money since the 1970’s; CGIAR, the global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to promote its ideal of genetic purity through agriculture change.

Who uses such a seed bank in the first place? Plant breeders and researchers are the major users of gene banks. Today’s largest plant breeders are Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta and Dow Chemical, the global plant-patenting GMO giants. Since early in 2007 Monsanto holds world patent rights together with the United States Government for plant so-called ‘Terminator’ or Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT). Terminator is an ominous technology by which a patented commercial seed commits ‘suicide’ after one harvest. Control by private seed companies is total. Such control and power over the food chain has never before in the history of mankind existed.

This clever genetically engineered terminator trait forces farmers to return every year to Monsanto or other GMO seed suppliers to get new seeds for rice, soybeans, corn, wheat whatever major crops they need to feed their population. If broadly introduced around the world, it could within perhaps a decade or so make the world’s majority of food producers new feudal serfs in bondage to three or four giant seed companies such as Monsanto or DuPont or Dow Chemical.

That, of course, could also open the door to have those private companies, perhaps under orders from their host government, Washington, deny seeds to one or another developing country whose politics happened to go against Washington’s. Those who say ‘It can’t happen here’ should look more closely at current global events. The mere existence of that concentration of power in three or four private US-based agribusiness giants is grounds for legally banning all GMO crops even were their harvest gains real, which they manifestly are not.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-2/23503 - - Cached - Similar pages

Comment by oxide
2013-05-25 08:40:44

So wait, they’re filling a “doomsday” vault with seeds that are only good for one growing season after said Day of Doom? And after that season all the people — presumably left over from the Day of Doom — will be forced to go to Monsanto to buy…. hey wait, wouldn’t that Doomsday cause a disruption in Monsanto’s supply chain of seeds? There wouldn’t be anything to buy.

This is gonna backfire. At some point, those genes will mutate to where the seeds are no longer suicidal. As they said in Jurassic Park, life finds a way. Roundup Ready is already succumbing to superweeds.

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-25 11:13:04

“So wait, they’re filling a “doomsday” vault with seeds that are only good for one growing season after said Day of Doom?”

No, I think the New World Order seeds locked behind dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick will be the renewable kind.

“Since early in 2007 Monsanto holds world patent rights together with the United States Government for plant so-called ‘Terminator’ or Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT). Terminator is an ominous technology by which a patented commercial seed commits ‘suicide’ after one harvest. Control by private seed companies is total. Such control and power over the food chain has never before in the history of mankind existed.”

“This clever genetically engineered terminator trait forces farmers to return every year to Monsanto or other GMO seed suppliers to get new seeds for rice, soybeans, corn, wheat whatever major crops they need to feed their population.”
————————————————————————-
What do they talk about at those crazy Bilderberg meetings?

National Security Study Memorandum 200

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger.

It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975. It was originally classified, but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s.

The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries (LDCs) is a concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development. The policy gives “paramount importance” to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries, to control rapid population growth which the US deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the “U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad”, and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United States. It recommends the US leadership to “influence national leaders” and that “improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the U.N., USIA, and USAID.”

Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.

The report advocates the promotion of education and contraception and other population control measures. It also raises the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures.

National Security Study Memorandum 200 - Wikipedia, the free …
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200 - 32k
—————————————————————————-

Kissinger Report: A Retrospective on NSSM-200
Kissinger Report 2004

A Retrospective on NSSM-200

Brian Clowes

Human Life International, 2004

On December 10, 1974, the United States National Security Council promulgated National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM-200), also called The Kissinger Report. This document explicitly laid out a detailed strategy by which the United States would aggressively promote population control in developing nations in order to regulate (or have better access to) the natural resources of these countries.

In order to protect U.S. commercial interests, NSSM-200 cited a number of factors that could interrupt the smooth flow of materials from lesser-developed countries, LDCs as it called them, to the United States, including a large population of anti-imperialist youth, who must, according to NSSM-200, be limited by population control. The document identified 13 nations by name that would be primary targets of U.S.-funded population control efforts.

According to NSSM-200, elements of the implementation of population control programs could include: a) the legalization of abortion; b) financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates; c) indoctrination of children; and d) mandatory population control, and coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless an LDC implements population control programs.

While the CIA and Departments of State and Defense have issued hundreds of papers on population control and national security, the U.S. government has never renounced NSSM-200, but has only amended certain portions of its policy. NSSM-200, therefore, remains the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government.

http://www.hli.org/kissinger-report/193 - 163k -

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-25 09:10:45

Reminds me of taking a snapshot/backup of your codebase just before you do something that might totally screw it up.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-05-25 12:18:38

“Control by private seed companies is total. Such control and power over the food chain has never before in the history of mankind existed.”

We can thank the courts for the Megacorp, Inc. favorable rulings which allowed the patenting of food. The disgustingly greedy nature of mankind knows no limits.

Comment by non-conformist
2013-05-25 12:58:51

Not to worry, the United States Government holds world patent rights together with Monsanto.

“Since early in 2007 Monsanto holds world patent rights together with the United States Government for plant so-called ‘Terminator’ or Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT).”

Bilderberg Objectives

“Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and generals rub shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets along, and where the people running the wars, markets, and Europe (and America) say what they never dare say in public.”

The Group’s grand design is for “a One World Government (World Company) with a single, global marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially regulated by one ‘World (Central) Bank’ using one global currency.” Their “wish list” includes:

– “one international identify (observing) one set of universal values;”

– centralized control of world populations by “mind control;” in other words, controlling world public opinion;

– a New World Order with no middle class, only “rulers and servants (serfs),” and, of course, no democracy;

– “a zero-growth society” without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the rulers;

– manufactured crises and perpetual wars;

– absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;

– “centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies;” one size fits all globally;

– using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on “world citizens;”

– expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;

– making NATO a world military;

– imposing a universal legal system; and

– a global “welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for extermination.”

http://real-agenda.com/2013/05/16/the-bilderberg-group-origins-and-influence/ - 96k -

I wonder who built the Stones?

Georgia Guidestones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In June 1979, an unknown person or persons under the pseudonym R. C. Christian hired Elberton Granite Finishing Company to build the structure.[2]

A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese and Russian.

1.Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

2.Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.

3.Unite humanity with a living new language.

4.Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.

5.Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

6.Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

7.Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

8.Balance personal rights with social duties.

9.Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.

10.Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature

Georgia Guidestones - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones - 66k -

Comment by ahansen
2013-05-25 22:31:43

Remove some of the more hysterical language from the Bilderberg objectives and they’re not all that incompatible with the Georgia Guidestones.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:21:11

Suppose that over a three-week period, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by 7% (around 1000 points), from its current level of 15,303 to 14,300. Would that be considered “a real selloff,” or just a minor dip?

This is the magnitude of drop in 30-year Treasurys since May 2nd. And the Nikkei also had a 7% drop in just one night this past week. Luckily for Wall Street bulls, the headline U.S. stock market indices are fully decoupled from other asset classes.

Even better: U.S. housing is decoupled from everything else now, and leading the U.S. towards recovery.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:25:41

CREDIT MARKETS
Updated May 24, 2013, 3:05 p.m. ET
Treasurys Reclaim Their Mojo
Strength Returns as Bargain-Hunters Appear, but Prices Still Fall for the Week
By MIN ZENG

Treasury bonds strengthened Friday as the $11.4 trillion market regained some poise after being jolted by one of the biggest price swings in months.

The monthlong selloff sent the benchmark 10-year note’s yield above 2% this past week for the first time in more than two months, enticing buying from bargain-hunting investors.

Bond prices still posted losses for the week, driven by worries that the Federal Reserve, a major buyer, could cut back its purchases in coming months.

The anxiety was heightened by comments from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday, generating violent swings from Treasury bonds to mortgage-backed debt and stocks—all of which have benefited from the central bank’s liquidity provision.

The benchmark 10-year note’s yield has surged more than 0.3 percentage point in May, hitting as high as 2.069% during Thursday’s session, a level last seen in March.

“The Treasury market has stabilized as 10-year [yield] tested 2.06% this week and held,” said Tom di Galoma, head of fixed-income-rates sales at ED&F Man Capital Markets. “Money managers are redirecting funds back to fixed income” from riskier assets such as stocks.

At the end of Friday’s shortened session, the benchmark 10-year note was up 4/32 in price, pushing down the yield to 2.010%. The yield still rose 0.06 percentage point for the week. Bond prices move inversely to their yields.

The U.S. bond market closed at 2 p.m. EDT Friday, and will remain shut Monday for the Memorial Day holiday.

Just like in March, yields above 2% remain a magnet for some investors. The 10-year yield hit this year’s peak of 2.086% on March 8, but fresh buyers swooned in to push the yield lower.

Many buyers believe the selloff in May is overdone. They are skeptical the Fed would start cutting back on bond purchases any time soon given the still-uncertain economic outlook.

“Until stronger economic data tells us otherwise, I think Treasury bonds should find support at 2.0% yield,” said Mary Ann Hurley, vice president of trading in Seattle at D.A. Davidson & Co.

Some investors also see buying Treasury bonds as a hedge against potential big selloff in U.S. stocks. Prices of stocks have hit a record this month, driven by the Fed’s generous liquidity.

“That’s what buyers of bonds think today,” said Andrew Brenner, head of international fixed income at National Alliance Capital Markets in New York. But Mr. Brenner warned that this hedging strategy might not work once the Fed cuts its stimulus program.

Both Treasury bonds and stocks sold off Wednesday after Mr. Bernanke said that day that he doesn’t rule out cutting back on bond buying in coming months, even though he also suggested that premature tightening in monetary policy could stall economic recovery.

The Fed has been buying $45 billion in Treasury bonds each month since January along with $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities, keeping bond yields near historic lows.

One of these times, it is going to be a real selloff in Treasury bonds, and bond yields will break higher, but we don’t think the time is now,” said Jeffrey Young, U.S. rates strategist at Nomura Securities International in New York.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:33:32

GOLDMAN: ‘The Bond Sell-Off: It’s For Real’
Matthew Boesler
May 23, 2013, 11:30 AM

U.S. Treasury yields bottomed out in July 2012 after three decades of a steady grind lower.

Since then, they have had their ups and downs, but eventually, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury hit a high of 2.06% on March 11, right before the financial crisis in Cyprus blew up and the consensus began to shift its focus to fears over an emerging slowdown in global growth.

That backdrop set the stage for a big rally in Treasuries as investors piled back into them, sending yields all the way down to 1.63% on May 2.

In the last three weeks, however, yields have reversed violently as investors have sold bonds and are once again testing the post-low highs set in early March.

And this time, Goldman Sachs says the bond market sell-off is for real (in a note to clients titled “The Bond Sell-Off: It’s For Real”).

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:42:05

I’m coming to realize that most MSM financial writers are either too lazy or ignorant to run the numbers which show the price effect of a rise in Treasury yields. For instance, what is not dramatic about a 7% selloff in three weeks?

10-Year and 30-Year Treasury Yields Screaming, Challenge 2013 Cycle-Highs
by 24/7 Wall St. May 22nd 2013 12:57PM
Updated May 23rd 2013 6:45AM

Didn’t Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s testimony on Wednesday morning intend to calm fears that the bond buying was going to come to a quick end, or even a quick tapering off of activity? Apparently the bond market did not get that memo, and this matters because most investors consider the bond market to be more rational and a better prediction indicator than the stock market.

Now we have seen that the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note has suddenly gone back up over 2.00%. In fact, the last move was up about basis points for a 2.01% yield. The 30-year Treasury Bond is also up about 7 basis points to 3.20%. Over the last month we have now seen 10-year rates rise 22 basis points and 30-year rates rise by 25 basis points.

If you go back before this move to see higher rates earlier in 2013, the last time that the 10-year Treasury Note was up over 2.00% was March 15 and that cycle high yield was 2.09%.

Now go back to the 30-year Long Bond yield at 3.20%. The move here is less dramatic but we are now challenging yield highs going back to March as well when it looked as though the Treasury Long Bond was going to break above 3.30%.

 
Comment by azdude
2013-05-25 05:48:18

homes and stocks are the economy.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 09:53:33

The definition of a “Bear Market” is a 20% drop

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:10:08

There is the total amount by which an asset price falls since the latest peak, but then there is also the rate of descent.

Try to find a similar period when one of the headline stock market indexes fell by 7% over three weeks (annualized rate of decline =
((1-0.07)^(52/3)-1)*100 = 71.6%) without a single MSM comment.

I am pretty sure you won’t be able to do so…

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-25 05:22:51

What can be said about housing? Houses are depreciating assets year after year until they end up right back in the ground right where they came from. Thus it is wise to limit your exposure to anything related to housing unless you want to be in enslaved to losses from which you will not recover. Current asking prices of resale housing are massively inflated far far above replacement cost.

The increasingly distorted residential real estate market will result in a much larger implosion than anyone imagined. Being locked in to the housing market is something you’re going to regret.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:30:12

“The increasingly distorted residential real estate market will result in a much larger implosion than anyone imagined.”

Any thoughts on how or when this might happen, given the current presence of massive government intervention to prop up housing?

Comment by azdude
2013-05-25 05:43:09

you simply cannot lose buying a house in this climate. A house is the american dream.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:53:26

Those were my thoughts, too. And besides, real estate always goes up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2013-05-25 05:57:34

you gonna play a little golf at the RB country club today and dream of that white picket fence?

U should ask your landlord to install some solar panels so you can save some money.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:08:00

I don’t play golf…never have, never will, even if I come into a fortune some day.

In fact, I would rather sit here and read your stupid posts than lug a bag fully of irons and putters around an artificially-watered and -fertilized grass farm in order to hit a small, hard white ball into a small cup while patting myself on the back about how rich I am.

But that’s just me…different strokes for different folks!

 
Comment by azdude
2013-05-25 06:12:11

take a trip down to pacific beach for some eye candy?

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:35:35

“…take a trip down to pacific beach for some eye candy?”

Nice thought…but I work in plain view of a beach, with plenty of ‘eye candy’ in my immediate surroundings, which is a college campus. So I can’t say I feel much deprived in that area…

 
Comment by scdave
2013-05-25 08:17:05

but I work in plain view of a beach, with plenty of ‘eye candy’ in my immediate surroundings, which is a college campus ??

I am jealous….

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-25 09:13:18

In fact, I would rather sit here and read your stupid posts than lug a bag fully of irons and putters around an artificially-watered and -fertilized grass farm in order to hit a small, hard white ball into a small cup while patting myself on the back about how rich I am.

Sounds like the theme for the whole blog…Ben should put it on the front page somewhere :-).

 
Comment by oxide
2013-05-25 09:20:14

I’ve played golf twice. I kinda liked it, and can sort of understand the obsession with it. However, the comparison to money is incredibly apt. A sufficient amount is good, but it ultimately turns people mean. It’s not worth it.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:04:34

“Golf is a bunch of men in ugly pants walking” - Rosie O’Donnell

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:11:50

LOL — thanks, Bill!

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:16:54

I also had a severe belly laugh at how she made fun of Trump!

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2013-05-25 11:43:18

Go to youtube and type in “Robin Williams golf”.

Don’t blame me if you laugh so hard that you wet your pants.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-05-25 06:42:24

When? It will be an exogenous event that will precipitate the cascade and it will occur rapidly. We’re witnessing the wind up to it right now.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:52:55

Sounds about right. “Nobody could have seen it coming,” will be the oft-repeated phrase to describe the black swan guano bomb which eventually lands on the U.S. housing market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:50:07

Latest national casualty of the global economic slowdown?

Sweden.

Swedish police try to restore order in Stockholm after week of rioting

Reinforcements brought in after disturbances show Sweden is not immune to tensions festering in deprived communities
Anthony Lane in Stockholm and agencies
guardian.co.uk, Friday 24 May 2013 12.39 EDT

Stockholm suburb
Burnt out cars in Stockholm: rioting continued in the Swedish capital on Thursday for the fifth night in a row. Photograph: Rikard Stadler/Rikard Stadler/Demotix/Corbis

Police reinforcements have poured into the capital from provincial districts as Stockholm sought to put an end to a week of rioting, the worst to hit Sweden for years.

Disturbances have spread to 23 suburbs, dozens of cars have been set alight and around 30 people have been detained in connection with the riots, which were touched off on Sunday after police shot dead a man, believed to be Portuguese, who was reportedly wielding a knife.

The riots have served as a sharp reminder that despite regular praise for its ‘Nordic model’ of progressive politics, relatively low unemployment and a generous social safety net, Sweden is not immune to the tension that festers in deprived communities.

The riots began on Sunday in the neighbourhood of Husby, 14km north-west of Stockholm’s city centre, a week after police shot a 69-year-old man who was reportedly roaming the area with a machete. According to Stockholm police, the man retreated to an apartment that was stormed by officers who were concerned for the welfare of a female inhabitant. An attempt to disarm the man with a flash grenade was unsuccessful and he was then shot by the police. The incident resulted in groups of young local men setting fire to about 100 vehicles.

Husby was calm on Friday, with children making their way home from school only showing the most cursory interest in burnt-out wrecks under the bridge next to their school.

Although the smashed windows of shops, two schools and the local library had yet to be replaced, locals of the 12,000-strong neighbourhood, which has an 80% immigrant population, said there had been no problems since 20 members of the local Islamic centre went around Husby to talk to the youths involved in the original disturbances.

“They told them that it had to stop and that they were scaring people,” said Abdul, a nurse in the local hospital after Friday prayers at the mosque.

“At the moment it’s very hard to get jobs – not just here but for everyone in Sweden,” said the Moroccan immigrant who had lived in Husby for 11 years. Having registered growth of 6.1% and 3.9% in 2010 and 2011 respectively, the Swedish economy slowed to just 0.8% last year, largely as a result of faltering exports to the eurozone. Residents born outside Sweden represent 15% of the country’s 9.5 million population, but account for 35% of those registered as unemployed.

Many of the riots have occurred in cramped neighbourhoods with tall, run-down housing blocks, which were quickly constructed as part of Sweden’s “million homes” project in the 1960s and 1970s when Stockholm was in the grip of one of its periodic housing crises. Long-since abandoned by almost all of their original inhabitants, they are often the only source of available housing for migrants and asylum-seekers from war-torn countries.

Sweden’s relaxed immigration policy and generous asylum system has resulted in exceptionally high immigration levels over the last decade. In 2012, 82,000 non-Swedes migrated to the country – 44,000 of them were asylum-seekers. The country’s migration board expects to receive 54,000 asylum seekers in 2013, including around 20,000 Somalis.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 08:24:56

I’d say they are the latest casualty of uncontrolled importation of the “wretched refuse”

Too bad that none of the people who advocate immigration ever have to live with the consequences. Another “privatize the gains, socialize the losses” program.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-25 09:41:34

The Japanese catch a lot of flack for keeping their immigration doors shut tight, and end up being called xenophobes. Funny though how we never hear about these kinds of problems there.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:22:19

They are facing another set of problems unique to countries like Japan with tightly-shut immigration doors, which is that they have no quick and easy way to remedy the juxtaposition of a birth dearth with an aging post-WWII Baby Boom demographic bulge.

Though America faces similar issues, with the right immigration policy, we could completely avoid them.

For instance, I am currently advising a student who is every employer’s ideal: Young, attractive, engaging, industrious, capable, creative…the list of positives is long. But since she is a citizen of our northern neighbor, it is very expensive and nearly impossible for her to get permission to work in the U.S., despite her long-term interest in laying down roots here and becoming a U.S. citizen. By contrast, illegals flying under the radar screen appear to have a much easier time becoming citizens of the People’s Republic of California, if not the U.S. proper.

Here are some simple suggestions for anyone with the power to change U.S. immigration policy which could go a long way to remedy the demographic issues we face over the next three decades:

1. Make it easy for young, attractive, engaging, industrious, capable, creative foreign nationals who want to become U.S. citizens to do so.

2. Make it harder for illegal immigrants or foreign terrorists to gain entry and lay down roots here.

3. Design an immigration policy which effectively and efficiently discriminates in favor of immigrants in category 1. and against those in category 2.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-25 15:08:36

young, attractive,

I agree. Bring in the hotties! For the good of America!

I’ll sponsor a few.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 17:35:50

“…hotties…”

That wasn’t the main point…not that I have anything against sexually attractive females or anything.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-26 06:49:16

Your idea makes too much sense, but you end up with a country full of Fox News Republican women that way.

Seriously, the immigration proposals by McSame, former president GWB, and other RINOs and Demos favor a class of more dependents on the growing state.

Highly skilled people do not consider themselves serfs to the state and resent supporting low skilled people.

I am not saying they are future Republicans as much as I am saying they are future libertarians.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 09:55:58

The new immigrants are Free Sh*t Army voters.

That is WHY their current administration lets them in.

More votes. And more power. Works every place it is tried.

Besides, they never riot in their lilly white gated communities…

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:07:21

Yeah, that’s why.

Because expanding the labor pool and keeping wages down doesn’t benefit the business/Republican class.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-05-25 12:30:33

Exactly. If you want a new yacht, just increase the labor force to drive down wages, then buy your new yacht off the backs of the working poor. Bootstrapping 101.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:55:23

Italians getting glummer on economy, Letta government
By Gavin Jones
ROME | Fri May 24, 2013 1:59pm BST

(Reuters) - Italian consumer morale fell unexpectedly in May despite the tax-cutting promises of a new government whose approval ratings are already sliding.

Prime Minister Enrico Letta took office last month at the head of a left-right coalition which is bickering on a daily basis and its problems were underlined by the marked decline in sentiment on the economy.

Statistics office ISTAT’s consumer confidence index, the first to be conducted since the government was formed, slid to 85.9 in May from 86.3.

The fall in morale reversed a rise in April and left the index close to record lows, offering little prospect of a near term exit from Italy’s longest post-war recession.

Letta has suspended a hated housing tax that was due to be paid in June and promised to cut labour taxes. He says he will tackle youth unemployment of above 38 percent and lobby the European Union for more growth-oriented policies. But Italians appear unimpressed.

The government’s approval rating has fallen to just 31 percent from 43 percent three weeks ago, according to a poll published on Friday by the SWG agency.

Another survey released on Friday by the IPR agency gave Letta a personal approval rating of 45 percent.

That was down three points from April 30 and far lower than the ratings of any of the previous three prime ministers, Mario Monti, Silvio Berlusconi and Romano Prodi, after one month in office. Monti had an approval rating of 62 percent.

Consumer spending has long been a weak spot in the Italian economy, which has been the most sluggish in the euro zone for at least a decade.

Retail sales in March - the most recent data available - fell for a fourth consecutive month and were down an unadjusted 3 percent from the year earlier, indicating a marked contraction in real or inflation-adjusted terms.

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-25 06:29:31

‘Ratings agency Moody’s Investor Service said Monday that there is a high probability that Jamaica and Belize will relapse into default. Moody’s sees the default of Belize, Jamaica and Grenada over the past year as part of a broader debt crisis in the Caribbean. According to data compiled by the International Monetary Fund, Jamaica’s national debt exceeded 100 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) and other small Caribbean states were carrying debts above 70 percent of GDP.’

‘At its core, the Caribbean’s debt crisis is the result of a combination of poor fiscal discipline and unproductive investment that failed to significantly raise potential growth rates,” Moody’s said.’

‘This legacy of debt accumulation started in the 1990s, as governments accelerated borrowing, often from external commercial sources, to finance public-sector investment, it explained.’

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:40:30

“…as governments accelerated borrowing, often from external commercial sources,…”

I suppose that was when Megabank, Inc was wrapping its tentacles around the global financial system in order to get its beak into the best position for parasitic blood sucking?

 
Comment by measton
2013-05-25 07:54:04

It could also be a loss of tourism.
Middle class
Europeans and Americans are dieing
That’s who shows up in these countries.
As the countries get poorer security will worsen which will cut tourism even more.

Comment by scdave
2013-05-25 08:20:59

As the countries get poorer security will worsen which will cut tourism even more ??

Yep…What group has the most disposable income…Older group…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Lola
2013-05-25 09:53:17

All is not well in Paradise:
Back in 2009, Britain suspended parts of the constitution of the Turks and Caicos over systemic corruption and financial mismanagement. It was not restored until late last year and the country will remain under tight scrutiny for some time.
http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/67763/fco_turks_and_caicos_islands.html

The Cayman Islands has also had numerous clashes with the British FCO and in December last year, the Premier was arrested on suspicion of theft, breach of trust, abuse of office, and conflict of interest and was ousted from office in a non confidence vote. In the recent election, he sought re-election (even though he’s facing 11 criminal charges) but was not successful.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 09:58:39

The irony?

Debt to GDP in America under obama is now at 105%

Yeah - you don’t even have to do the math.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-26/total-us-debt-gdp-105

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 05:57:35

“High risk” of deeper Cyprus recession: central bank
POSTED: 22 May 2013 9:08 PM

Cyprus’s central bank governor said on Wednesday the country’s teetering economy could fall deeper into recession than previously thought.

Central Bank Governor Panicos Demetriades (AFP/Yiannis Kourtoglou)

NICOSIA: Cyprus’s central bank governor said on Wednesday the country’s teetering economy could fall deeper into recession than previously thought.

“Risks to the outlook are substantial and tilted to the downside,” Panicos Demetriades said in a prepared speech to certified public accountants.

“Macro-economic risks remain unusually high, given the uncertain impact of the banking crisis and fiscal consolidation on economic activity,” he added.

Demetriades did not forecast what the decline would be, but Finance Minister Haris Georgiades said on Tuesday the it could be in the double digits.

The International Monetary Fund, which has joined with the European Commission and European Central Bank to provide near-bankrupt Cyprus with a 10 billion-euro bailout (US$13 billion), forecast last week that gross domestic product would decline 8.7 percent this year and 3.9 percent in 2014.

But it also warned the decline could be worse than that.

Demetriades also said capital controls imposed as part of the bailout package will have to be eased gradually, as eliminating them abruptly could trigger rapid outflows from the banking sector and liquidity problems.

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 10:00:11

So bailing out banks by taking away money from citizens doesn’t work?

That is just commie talk.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:25:09

I think the problem is that they were not sneaky enough about it. If you use the printing press to redistribute wealth and claim it benefits everyone, while ignoring the subsequent huge increase in the wealth gap between those working in the FIRE sector and almost everyone else, you are likely to have more success.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:00:23

Is France’s Economy a Surprise Threat to Eurozone?
By Marlene Y. Satter, AdvisorOne
May 23, 2013

The “bad boys” of the southern Eurozone, Greece, Spain and Italy, have gotten most of the attention in the thorny question of a possible Eurozone breakup. Even little Cyprus has been in the spotlight, although its economy is small enough that failure to work out a deal for a bailout would not necessarily have threatened the currency union.

But the real threat may lie in an unexpected direction: France. It lost its AAA credit rating from Moody’s in January and is beset by controversy and hard times. Its unemployment rate hit a record high in April of 10.6%. Although lower than the Eurozone’s average rate of 11.4%, it’s still rising, and likely to keep doing so as its economy shrinks.

Rising unemployment, falling exports, and an increasingly negative trade balance have combined with other problems—an escalating dispute with Germany over austerity vs. jobs, the failure of French President Francois Hollande to fix the country’s economic woes, and increasing immigration hostility. Even the European Commission President Manuel Jose Barroso accused the country of having a negative view of globalization. He also said France had, over the past two decades, lost competitiveness.

France has, in fact, come to look upon its European Union membership as a handicap, not an advantage. A new Pew poll, The New Sick Man of Europe, said that, pre-2007, France’s outlook more closely resembled Germany’s. Now its views are more aligned with those of Spain, Italy, and Greece as some of the most pessimistic in Europe; France now believes being in the EU has undermined its overall economy.

Comment by measton
2013-05-25 07:56:01

The game is called dominoes see discussion of Jamaica and Belize above.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-05-25 16:15:32

Germany owns the euro, and by extension, the European Union. The rest of Europe is slowly becoming aware of that.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:10:09

Spanish unemployment
Indignant, undignified
It is the young who suffer most from high unemployment
May 25th 2013 | MADRID |From the print edition

JOSÉ GARCIA used to work as a doorman. But two years ago he lost his job. Since then the 62-year-old has lived off unemployment insurance built up when he was working. This month it runs out. Now he hopes for €426 ($550) a month in long-term state subsidy. With unemployment above 27%, he does not expect to work again. “I’ll keep looking, but the queue will always be long,” he says.

The jobless rate is unlikely to drop below 25% before he claims his pension at 65. The prime minister, Mariano Rajoy, hopes to turn the jobs corner before the next election in late 2015, but his record so far is dismal. Over the past 17 months 1.2m jobs have gone, taking the total lost since 2007 to over 6m. Net job growth needs GDP growth above 1%, yet the government does not predict that until 2016. In the European Union only Greece’s jobless figures are worse. And in southern provinces such as Cadiz the rate is above 40%. Among under-25s, the figure is a horrific 57%.

Some analysts say these figures hide a large underground economy. That may be true, although Visa Europe reckons that it is no bigger than the European average and, with the decline of construction, is contracting. But even if the numbers are exaggerated, the rate remains accurate on one count. Over 3m fewer workers now pay taxes or social-security contributions than did five years ago. That knocks the public accounts.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:13:24

Samaras says Ireland is model for Greek recovery
Prime minister says improving competitiveness and low tax rates would help Athens
Damian Mac Con Uladh
Thu, May 23, 2013, 15:47
First published: Thu, May 23, 2013, 08:20

Ireland is a model for Greece on how to exit the crisis and return to the money markets, the Greek prime minister told Taoiseach Enda Kenny in Athens this morning,

“Ireland is showing the way and that there is an end to this road,” Antonis Samaras, the conservative leader of Greece’s three-way coalition, said this afternoon at a press conference following a meeting between the two leaders.

“After many reforms implemented by Enda Kenny’s government, Ireland shows us the way. We know that they are on the track to recovery and are almost ready to fully return to the international money markets,” Mr Samaras told the press conference, which was relayed live on Greek state television.

The Greek leader said improving competitiveness, opening up to investment and low tax rates would help Greece match Ireland’s success.

“All of these issues have helped Ireland exit the crisis … and we will follow suit as soon as we start exiting the crisis,” he said, adding that it was his aim to introduce a flat-rate tax of 15 per cent.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:16:10

Russia to become ‘next Greece’ with slowing economic growth - Renaissance Capital
Published time: May 22, 2013 12:38
Edited time: May 22, 2013 15:02
An employee pours molten iron into molds for making manhole covers at the Smarhon Casting and Mechanical Plant in the town of Smarhon, the Grodno region.(RIA Novosti / Egor Eryomov)

* Federal budget deficit is likely to widen next year more than expected due to a weaker economy erasing $20.8 billion in revenue
* Economy is expanding at the weakest pace since contracting in 2009
* Main export Urals blend crude has averaged $107.51 a barrel this year, compared with $110.26 in 2012, according to Bloomberg.
* The rouble has weakened 1.3% against the central bank’s basket of dollars and euros to 35.3103 as of 1:26 pm GMT+4
* Russia will probably require an average Brent oil price of $117.8 a barrel this year to balance its budget

The Russian economy will not be able to grow faster than 2 percent per year in the coming decade and might become another Greece, says one of Russia’s leading investment banking firms Renaissance Capital.

This would mean the government increasing national debt just like it was in Greece.

The slowing economic growth in Russia to 1.6 percent in the first quarter of 2013 has been connected to various factors including falling investment, private consumption and weak exterior demand, Vedomosti daily reports.

However according to Ivan Chakarov, an analyst with Renaissance Capital quoted by the newspaper, the slowing pace of economic growth in Russia is mainly due to the so-called middle-income trap.

It is common for developing economies, when a country, which attains a certain income, gets stuck at that level as it begins losing its main advantage – low costs.

The analyst claims the middle-income trap strikes a country when annual per capita GDP reaches $16,000. In Russia this figure is slightly above that at $16,016. The analysts added that Russia is the first BRICS state to enter the middle-income trap. Similar economic situations were seen in the Western Europe’s economy in the 1970s, in South Korea in 1995 and in Singapore and Hong Kong at the beginning of the 1980s.

In his comments Chakarov refers to the study by the US National Bureau of Economic Research, which has come to a conclusion that countries falling into the trap lose two thirds of their growth speed. This means that Russian economic growth will slow to 1.6 percent of GDP against 4.3 percent in 2010-2011.

The analyst says that in the upcoming decade the Russian economy won’t be able to expand faster than 2 percent per year. In his opinion this may force the Russian government to increase the national debt and make Russia “the next Greece”.

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-25 09:17:09

Seems like regardless of the price of oil, just having oil and natural gas means they will never be Greece.

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 10:02:54

That and having a functioning army, navy and airforce means that Russia will nationalize whatever they want.

And Putin will say “You got a problem with that?”

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-25 09:47:44

The Russian economy will not be able to grow faster than 2 percent per year in the coming decade and might become another Greece

SO while we are fubar’d, we are less fubar’d than others.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:21:25

Aside from the fact that they have a powerful political lobby which has proven very effective in bribing politicians to protect their political interests, isn’t there a case for completely ending the realty profession in the internet age? What good does a lying scumbag Realtor™ do you in an era when you can go online to get all the information you need about a home you want to buy, or even the entire market?

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:22:43

How Canada’s housing downturn threatens to shake up real estate commissions
TARA PERKINS - REAL ESTATE REPORTER
The Globe and Mail
Published Saturday, May. 25 2013, 8:00 AM EDT
Last updated Saturday, May. 25 2013, 2:15 AM EDT

The power of the Internet was going to shatter the grip that realtors have on house sales in Canada, driving down commissions and empowering consumers.

The Internet failed.

The Competition Bureau waded in to overcome the industry’s stasis, attempting to create a market where consumers pick which services they want and data are more widely available.

But, so far, it’s accomplished little.

In a country where grousing about bank fees is a national pastime, where a 5-cent rise in gasoline prices sparks outrage, one fee remains remarkably static: the thousands in commissions paid to real estate brokers. Technology has failed to snap consumers out of their complacency, and regulatory efforts to force the industry to make it easier for new Web-based firms to compete have been abortive.

But there is a new threat to the status quo that could be the catalyst for industry-rattling change: the housing slowdown.

Canadian house prices were generally on a tear from the turn of the century until last year, with most sellers still netting a tidy profit even after paying commissions. But that growth has now begun to taper off, with year-over-year price increases slowing from more than 6 per cent at the outset of last year to less than 3 per cent at the outset of this year (and some markets, such as Vancouver, seeing outright declines).

Economists suggest that the market could be entering a lengthy period in which house prices remain essentially flat. Toronto-Dominion Bank’s economists recently estimated that the nominal annual rate of return on real estate will be about 2 per cent over the next decade. In other words, the rise in home prices will just keep pace with inflation.

And that means that homeowners who buy and sell homes in the next 10 years will not be making the profits that homeowners who bought and sold in the past decade got used to. More commonly, sellers will be accepting prices that are much closer to what they paid.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:23:57

Housing
Do we still need real estate agents?
The Globe and Mail
Published Friday, May. 24 2013, 4:40 PM EDT
Last updated Friday, May. 24 2013, 8:37 PM EDT

Real estate reporter Tara Perkins joins Hannah Sung to discuss whether the demand for realtors has changed in recent years and whether it pays to save the commission fee and sell your home yourself. Read more in a full story in Saturday’s Report on Business and on ReportonBusiness.com.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:25:33

Is Canada’s housing market on the verge of a crash?
By Jennifer Kwan | Insight – 22 hours ago

Canada’s housing market has been a wildly popular topic lately with experts sounding off on everything from house-market affordability to house-buying intentions to the effects of too-long, very-low interest rates. All this is keeping the debate about the soft landing, or crash to come, firmly on the minds of Canadians.

The common link is the Bank of Canada’s benchmark rate, which has been frozen at 1.0 per cent since September 2010. The market doesn’t expect the central bank to move higher — if it moves higher — until sometime in the latter part of 2014, or even later, so in some ways there’s a bit more time to sit back, wait and watch.

If you believe The Economist, Canada’s housing market is “especially vulnerable” to a major correction, according to a recent analysis on global property markets. It says house prices here are overvalued by 73 per cent compared to rental prices, and 32 per cent overvalued when compared to household incomes.

“Home sales in March were 15% down on a year earlier. Buyers are in short supply. A recent poll showed that only 15% of Canadians are likely to buy a home in the next two years, down from 27% last year—the steepest decline in the 20-year history of the survey. After a big boom, the housing bust will be a wrenching affair,” the magazine stated earlier this month. This is golden for those who are in the doom and gloom camp, and don’t believe house prices will bounce any time soon.

Now, combine that with a recent warning by the Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals. This week the group said many Canadians are managing their debt responsibly, and warned Ottawa’s clampdown on mortgage lending rules has set the stage for up to a 30 per cent plunge in home sales by 2015, translating into massive job losses related to the industry and other negative things that could crimp economic activity. Think of all those first-time home buyers who may be on the sidelines.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:28:03

Portugal warns of deficit target miss
By AFP | 24 May, 2013, 09.51PM IST

LISBON: Portugal may request a third revision to deficit targets agreed with EU-IMF creditors as part of its 78-billion euro international bailout, Prime Minster Pedro Passos Coelho warned Friday.

“It is not excluded that it will be necessary to ask for further revision for 2014,” Coelho said in parliament.

The revision from the agreed 4.0 per cent of output would be the third one granted to Portugal after already winning leniency from the European Union and International Monetary Fund in March and December.

The warning comes as a new government spending package, announced by the centre-right government earlier this month, foresees the slashing of 30,000 public sector jobs out of a total 700,000.

The new terms are aimed at ensuring continued aid payments from a package worth 78 billion euros ($102 billion) granted in May 2011.

Passos Coelho said that the 2013 deficit target of 5.5 per cent of gross domestic product would however be met, even though budget figures for the first three months of the year were already off the mark.

Hit hard by the eurozone debt crisis, Portugal’s economy has been in recession for two years, and contracted by another 0.3 per cent in the first quarter with unemployment at a record high of 17.7 per cent.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:29:53

China’s Economic Outlook Just Keeps Getting Worse
posted: 6 hours ago

The unexpected contraction in China’s factory activity in May has heightened the risk of a further slowdown in the second quarter, after the world’s second largest economy grew at its slowest pace in three years over January to March, said economists.

The flash HSBC Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI) for May that was released on Thursday slipped to 49.6, falling under the key 50 level, which divides expansion from contraction, for the first since October. Last month, the final HSBC PMI stood at 50.4. The decline was driven partly by a fall in new orders - with the sub-index dropping to 49.5, the lowest reading since September.

“It is not good and it does increase the chances of a sequential slowdown in the second quarter GDP [gross domestic product]. Simply put, domestic demand this time wasn’t strong enough to counter fully the impact of still weak external demand,” Donna Kwok, greater China economist at HSBC told CNBC on Thursday.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 06:32:44

ft dot com
Last updated: May 23, 2013 3:50 pm
Shrinking eurozone output points to recession in second quarter
By Michael Steen in Frankfurt

The eurozone is likely to remain in recession in the second quarter, a business survey showed on Thursday, with output in both France and Germany, the two biggest economies, still shrinking.

The initial reading of the Markit eurozone Purchasing Managers’ Composite index for both the manufacturing and services sectors rose to 47.7 in May from 46.9 in April. That beat market expectations for the indicator but remained firmly short of the 50.0 level separating growth from contraction.

While country-specific readings for Germany showed it was at best stagnating, with a reading of 49.9, up from 49.2 in April, the broad-based downturn in France remained fierce. The French composite manufacturing and services index was unchanged at 44.3 in May.

The data will feed into a debate on whether the European Central Bank is doing enough to help stimulate a recovery in a region beset by record unemployment and stuck in the longest recession since the euro was created.

“The ECB’s quarter-point cut in interest rates seems to have done little to inspire confidence that the economy will start to pick up again,” Chris Williamson, chief economist at Markit, said.

The data group said there were signs of companies cutting prices in an effort to stimulate sales with the largest drop in manufacturing output prices since January 2010 recorded in the survey of about 5,000 eurozone businesses.

The prospect of a weak recovery later in the year for the eurozone hinges to a large extent on the global economy.

In a blow to hopes for such a recovery, a business survey released in China on Thursday showed industrial activity contracting.

The HSBC PMI survey for the manufacturing sector was on track to fall to a seven-month low of 49.6 in May from 50.4 the previous month. The Chinese economy has come under close scrutiny amid fears that growth is faltering. Preliminary manufacturing PMI data from the US showed output continued to expand but the pace of growth slowed, with the index falling to 51.9 from 52.1.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 07:01:39

Yesterday ahansen wanted to know why F&F stock prices were booming.

In short, the fix is in.

Rep. Mel Watt gains bipartisan support to head federal finance agency

Charlene Crowell

President Obama recently nominated Melvin (Mel) Watt, a long-time North Carolina Congressman, to direct the operations of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). While major news media reported on the development, few mentioned exactly what the new job would entail or the significance of an African American potentially leading a key financial office.

At a news conference announcing the nomination, President Obama said, “Mel understands as well as anybody what caused the housing crisis. He knows what it’s going to take to help responsible homeowners fully recover. And he’s committed to helping folks just like his mom — Americans who work really hard, play by the rules day in and day out to provide for their families.”

When our nation faced the worst financial crisis since that of the Great Depression, the House Financial Services Committee faced dealing with the nation’s financial solvency on one hand and millions of homeowners who were in or approaching foreclosure on the other. Through a series of discussions and hearings, Rep. Watt emerged as a voice of reason, consistently fair and balanced in crafting solutions to complex problems.

Following the Watt nomination, the Center for Responsible Lending said of the nominee, “He was one of the first elected officials to recognize and warn about the dangers of sub-prime lending, offering legislation to nip predatory lending in the bud and tirelessly advocating for ways to prevent needless home foreclosures…The Senate should move quickly to confirm him.”

Created by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the FHFA oversees the nation’s secondary mortgage markets: 12 Federal Home Loan Banks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. FHFA is also empowered to make policy, implement rules, and regularly report to Congress. In 2010, the combined debt and obligations of these 14 government-sponsored enterprises totaled $6.7 trillion.

Watt’s nomination is reminiscent of an earlier one in 1966. The late Andrew Brimmer, nominated by President Lyndon Johnson became the first African American member of the Federal Reserve Board. A Louisiana native, Brimmer attended segregated elementary and high schools but went on to earn a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard in 1957.

Watt, another son of the South raised from modest beginnings, became a 1967 Phi Beta Kappa graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. As a result of having the highest academic average in its business school, he also became president of the business honors fraternity. Three years later, he earned a law degree from Yale University Law School and was a published member of the Yale Law Journal.

Both men’s lives are proof that difficulty need not defeat a person’s dreams or goals. And further, what may appear improbable is not the same thing as being impossible.

On learning of Rep. Watt’s nomination, U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., reached across the chamber’s partisan divide to offer his hopes for confirmation saying, “Having served with Mel, I know of his commitment to sustainable federal housing programs and am confident he will work hard to protect taxpayers from future exposure to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I look forward to working with Rep. Watt in his new role to find new ways to facilitate more private sector involvement in the housing and mortgage markets.”

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 10:07:53

The Race card is officially being played.

If you vote against Watt’s nomination - why you are just a racist.

Oh yeah - play by the rules day in and day

Does that mean PAYING FOR THE STUFF YOU PROMISED TO PAY? That you signed a contract for? What about those rules?

I forgot. Playing by the rules for the Free Sh*t Army means voting democrat.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:26:29

Cramdowns are coming…FINALLY!

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:44:01

Only fools repay their loans.

The Free Sh*t Army can not wait for their free money cramdowns.

Because they are victims.

And they vote.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-25 23:36:16

So you’re suggesting the eight-fold rise in FNAM’s stock price over the last three months is a result of Watt’s pending appointment? Why doesn’t this resonate? If uber-goosing a stock’s price was simply a matter of appointing an African-American CEO, why isn’t everyone doing it?

I repeat, “why now”? I’ve researched this pretty extensively, and I can’t seem to find a compelling explanation….

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-05-26 07:55:39

I repeat, “why now”? I’ve researched this pretty extensively, and I can’t seem to find a compelling explanation….

The best explanation that I can come up with is that the fix is in, and the appropriate insiders have been so informed…

 
 
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-05-25 07:09:46

ot, but that story this morning
about that Palmdale, Ca 8 yr
old that died from fractures and
cig burns, among other torture,
was just so sad. His mother
watched her BF torture the kid.

Off w/ their heads. No 3 hots w/
a cot. Brutal evil animals.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 07:13:59

Reasonable guess: BF was similarly abused as a child (but lived…).

Comment by inchbyinch
2013-05-25 08:30:25

Whac…to bad for mankind
if that is the case. I was
mistreated (not that bad)
and my behaviors are a 180.
I used it as an anti-role model.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2013-05-25 08:32:05

Off w/ their heads. No 3 hots w/
a cot. Brutal evil animals ??

Nope….Send them to Pelican Bay…They should be greeted with open arms there…

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 07:18:30

Who wins in the battle between gold ETF sellers and retail buyers?

Time will tell…but meanwhile, I have some simple advice to offer: SELL EVERY RALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!

PRECIOUS-Gold heads for best week in four as stocks retreat

Fri May 24, 2013 10:49am EDT

* Gold boosted this week by drop in stock markets

* Fed official dampens talk Fed policy may tighten

* Largest physical gold fund sees fresh outflow (Updates prices, adds comment)

By Jan Harvey

LONDON, May 24 (Reuters) - Gold stayed on track for its biggest weekly rise in a month on Friday, supported by a drop in stock markets and comments from a Federal Reserve official that dampened talk the U.S. central bank is set to curb monetary stimulus.

Gold got a boost this week from a fall in equities, which in Europe posted their biggest one-day drop in nearly a year on Thursday. A rotation out of gold and into stocks this year has helped drive gold prices down 17 percent.

Speculation the Fed would scale back its monetary easing programme threatened to weigh on gold this week after Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said it could start scaling back its $85 billion in monthly bond purchases in the next few meetings.

But St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said on Friday that U.S. inflation would have to pick up before he voted to scale back stimulus.

Spot gold was at $1,390.01 an ounce at 1427 GMT, little changed from $1,390.40 late on Thursday but up 2.3 percent on the week. It is on track for its biggest weekly rise since late April, pulling further away from the near 2-1/2 year low it slumped to during last month’s rout.

“This week presented something for everyone,” Saxo Bank vice president Ole Hansen said. “The bears have not seen any evidence of them being wrong, while the bulls got a bit of safe haven and on balance a rather dovish Bernanke.”

“Bottom line, we are still in dangerous territory having failed so far to move back above $1,414. The double bottom which is now in the making might give technical traders some comfort, but for it to be confirmed we ideally need to see a $1,432 print, so it’s not yet something to lean against.

U.S. stocks fell for a third day on Friday, hurt by lingering concerns the Fed may scale back its support to the economy, while European stocks were set to end lower this week, the first week in five.

GOLD FUND REPORTS FRESH OUTFLOW

The SPDR Gold Trust, the world’s largest gold-backed ETF, reported at the close of Thursday that its holdings had fallen by another 1.5 tonnes, bringing its total outflow for the week to 19.8 tonnes.

The fund is on track for its largest weekly outflow since the week ended April 26. At 1,018.567 tonnes, its holdings were at their lowest in more than four years.

Macquarie said in a note on Friday that ETF liquidation this year had totalled 450 tonnes of gold.

“Given the extent of these outflows - equivalent to mine production from all of Africa and South America during the same period - that the gold price hasn’t completely collapsed is testament to strong retail demand (for jewellery, coins and bars),” it said.

“If ETFs continue to leach gold - and despite the outflows, over 2,200 tonnes remain - then gold’s price outlook will depend on these retail buyers.”

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:15:16

No thanks. I will BUY every month. Forget rally, forget dips in prices. I am my own central bank, so to speak, since I know central banks around the world are buying while weak-kneed societies (heavy in debt) are selling.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:28:40

You’ll be fine regardless of whether gold goes up or down from here, so long as you don’t have to sell at the next trough (which I doubt you will, based on reported diversification).

However, I think it is fairly clear at this point that the future direction of gold is entirely dependent on how the Fed exits the QE3 punch bowl spiking era; agreed?

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:44:49

So gold bugs will be fine whether prices go up or down. But everyone who buys a house will be effed whether prices go up or down.

Makes sense.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 17:32:45

I can’t speak to all gold investors, but since Bill dollar-cost-averages and has done so for a long time, I know he has little basis risk.

By contrast, if you buy a house right now you will lose alot of money — ALOT! Because once you buy, you are priced in forever.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 21:15:40

My investing is more bearish than my outlook on the economy for the next nineteen years. At least based on filling out a test a few weeks ago, given by my investment advisors.

Where I am at:

67% stocks and precious metals
23% bonds
10% cash.

Assets in the seven figures.

Where they advise me to be, given I want to work til 73:
80% stocks (get rid of some precious metals)
20% bonds
NO CASH!!!

However maybe they consider savings bonds and TBills liquid enough. I can redeem $3,000 every four weeks for t bills. My electronic savings bonds can be redeemed immediately.

Health wise I am very active and work out regularly to avoid obesity, but take prescriptions for issues I inherited, and do not smoke, and see a doctor three times a year to review my bloodwork and am on top of things.

I like working too.

So there is no reason for me to want to be out to pasture. Hoping to start a business in my early sixties and work it eight months a year, “vacation” (research, which does not earn income) four months a year.

So this all justifies my advisors in suggesting I take more risk. They say I own too much company stock - well this is suggested since its a small company and my target asset allocation is much lower. I anticipate selling off some shares this Fall anyway.

I wonder if my net worth was much smaller they would advise me to have cash? It is kind of odd any investment advisor would advise any person to not have cash, even a 22 year old.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:52:35

Almost agreed. Yet I did mention the entitlement crisis coming up. Tail end boomers might get some of what they paid in. gen-x types are going to get far less social security than they paid in. Now that we are a mobocracy, the two wolves are voting with the sheep on lunch. 401ks and IRAs will be partially confiscated starting in the next ten years, and redistributed to the wolves. The federal government knows the account information on all outpr IRAs and 401ks. I paid my federal and state taxes via routing numbers to IRS and Arizona. They grabbed the money lightning fast. Same way will be how they confiscate our IRAs and 401ks. The Cyprus experiment showed there was not a revolution when government did the lightning-quick confiscation of electronic assets there. Electronic confiscation is much easier than door-to-door SWAT team searches for tangible assets. Precious metals are movable and hidable. Fine wines are movable and hidable too, but not everyone will like fine wines.

Precious metal bullion is not an investment but insurance against the upcoming worse conditions of mob rule.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 08:45:14

I’m fully convinced that People are becoming deranged over their hatred of the President.

The boss told me yesterday that he opposes drone strikes. Because Obama plans to use them domestically, to murder all his critics.

At the same time, this very same government is too big and too stupid to accomplish anything.

Really, I don’t get the whole “droneaphobia” deal. Absolutely zero difference between launching a Hellfire from a drone, or an F-16……except the F-16 launch costs more. And, as they say, the government doesn’t care about controlling costs.

As far as “due process” is concerned, we have a long history of whacking US citizens who decide to hang out with people shooting at us.

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-05-25 09:16:33

‘I don’t get the whole “droneaphobia” deal’

It’s called the rule of law. For some reason, if it’s a drone, we aren’t at war. If our jets were flying over Yemen or Pakistan killing people we’d call that being at war. We’d expect the President to consult congress; let us know what was happening and why. But instead we get a secret, ill-defined “war”. It’s illegal and immoral in multiple ways.

‘we have a long history of whacking US citizens who decide to hang out with people shooting at us’

‘It is one of the worst incidents of the entire drones campaign, yet one of the least reported. A CIA strike on a madrassa or religious school in 2006 killed up to 69 children, among 80 civilians. The attack was on a religious seminary in Chenegai, in Bajaur Agency. CIA drones attacked on October 30, flattening much of the school. Their target was reportedly the headmaster, a known militant.’

‘It was claimed that ‘one of the deceased was only seven-year old, three were eight, three nine, one was 10, four were 11, four were 12, eight were 13, six were 14, nine were 15, 19 were 16, 12 were 17, three were 18, three were 19 and only two were 21-years old’

‘Initially the Pakistan Army claimed that it had carried out the bombardment, even as shops and offices closed across the region and protests spread. But as the scale of the attack unfolded, the story changed. The Sunday Times carried a report from a key aide to then-President Pervez Musharraf stating: ‘We thought it would be less damaging if we said we did it rather than the US. But there was a lot of collateral damage and we’ve requested the Americans not to do it again.’

http://tribune.com.pk/story/229844/the-day-69-children-died/

So we the CIA didn’t kill this one man at his house, or driving in a car. They waited until he was in a school full of children. If you don’t see what’s wrong with that, just wait a few years and I’m pretty sure some blow-back here in the US will open your eyes.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-25 09:49:48

It’s called the rule of law. For some reason, if it’s a drone, we aren’t at war. If our jets were flying over Yemen or Pakistan killing people we’d call that being at war.

I though loopholes were the “American Way”.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:01:43

Rule of law…..yeah, right. Let me know when anyone actually starts enforcing this on the kleptocrat/oligarch level.

As noted before, the Hellfire, like the honey badger, don’t give a s##t about what kind of aircraft it was launched from. And it isn’t the first time that kids have gotten into the line of fire. The USA has a long history of “doing what it takes to win”

A cynic like me might point out that these guys are hiding behind kids and non-combatants on purpose (you know, the old “swimming in the peasant sea” bit), and that blowing up a few markets/schools might send the message to the locals that being anywhere around these guys can be hazardous to you (or your kids) health, and save lives in the long run.

For the record: IMO, we shouldn’t be taking up temporary residence over there to begin with. The only reason we had business being in-country was to bring back OBL’s head on a long stick. All of this BS about “fighting them there instead of here” is a bunch of crap. For starters, if we were “fighting them over here” we’d have a lot fewer of them to identify and fight.

I know everyone hates “Nazi” comparisons, but, like the Nazis, the leadership and power centers in this country are rotten to the core, and are supported by a compliant Propaganda Ministry, aka the MSM. Putting Obama in jail (where I’m beginning to reluctantly conclude he may belong) would just mean that a bigger bunch of crooks (Republicans) would get the keys to the castle.

In my mind, I keep coming back to the “sow the wind, and reap the whirlwind” quote. People in this country won’t learn anything until we get our collective asses thoroughly kicked. Before then, I expect Republicans to implement policies that will create defacto Gulags/Arbeit macht Frei camps for the so-called Liberals/socialists/parasites of this country. You know, because taxation = theft.

Think I’m crazy? Try talking to some of these people out here in Flyover. I had a guy tell me the other day that US Muslim religious schools, no matter how radical, would be okay, as long as Christians are put in charge of the public schools.

(I was trying to explain that if you allow Christian-based teaching in public schools, you are opening the door for ALL religions to have the right to teach their religion in public schools, depending on what the local population believes…….good luck with nuanced, “thinking things thru to their logical conclusion” arguments)

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:17:04

Got it.

Democrats bad but Republicans would have been worse.

Democrats are in charge but Republicans want to build concentration camps.

Christian = muslims.

Don’t forget:

War = Peace

Slavery = Freedom

Work will set you free.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:35:30

You really are effing clueless

We’ve had thirty years of Republican dominated government policies to show us that maybe they aren’t working in the interest of anybody but the business owner class.

Concentration camps……..yeah, there are people out here saying that liberals should be in jail, if not shot.

Christians = Muslims…… I’m not prepared to sit here and say that I think Christians are closer to God than Muslims. Especially the brand of Christianity that I’m seeing.

War = Peace. WTF are you talking about?

Republican Freedom = The freedom to let just any kook buy an AR-15 (and 10,000 rounds of ammunition, with a Chase credit card, paying 20% interest.

In fact, think of the economic boost “legal” sales of MG-42s would provide. After all, they are the kind of gun a card-carrying militia member should have.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:43:31

“Democrats bad but Republicans would have been worse.”

SOP for the HBB. Everyone here is an “independent” who just happens to vote Democrat 100% of the time and blame 100% of the world’s problems on Republicans.

But don’t you dare accuse them of being partisan!! No, sir. They are independent critical thinkers.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:52:47

And 5 years into an obama presidency…

It is STILL all the fault of George Bush.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:57:01

Remember, 9/11, which happened 8 months into GWB’s 1st term was 100% Bush’s fault.

But the economy of 2013, is still Bush’s fault.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-25 11:59:54

Got it.

Democrats bad but Republicans would have been worse.

That is the the conclusion I have arrived at. Both will lead us to perdition.I quit the GOP, but did NOT become a Democrat. We need to find another way.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-25 12:03:07

SOP for the HBB. Everyone here is an “independent” who just happens to vote Democrat 100% of the time and blame 100% of the world’s problems on Republicans.

I’m a registered I who has never voted D for anything.

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:21:00

+1 Ben

Government lovers have no understanding of “Rule of Law.”

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:37:45

Uhhhhhh…….there was “law” before there was a means to enforce it?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-25 09:21:47

I’m fully convinced that People are becoming deranged over their hatred of the President.

Independent of the drone stuff, I think they’ve been deranged in their hatred of him for over 4 years now. And I didn’t vote for him.

But having said that, I’m concerned that in the end they will be proven right and I will be proven the sucker for thinking he’s a decent guy just doing the best he can.

Comment by jose canusi
2013-05-25 10:35:28

“But having said that, I’m concerned that in the end they will be proven right and I will be proven the sucker for thinking he’s a decent guy just doing the best he can.”

You have grave cause for concern because clearly, you’ve already been proven a sucker. You’re in good company, though. That’s the downfall of decent people and it’s how sociopaths get a foothold, because it’s very difficult for people to confront the evil in others and benefit of the doubt becomes the operating basis.

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-05-25 11:20:47

That’s the downfall of decent people and it’s how sociopaths get a foothold

I understand that. But for me it still hasn’t been proven that Obama is in that category and I’m suspicious of those who are 100% confident of it. I do have to acknowledge that it’s possible, though. As it is with many who make it that far.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:52:38

Dammit, enough with the nuance already!! :)

Don’t you know it’s a black/white, “if you aren’t with us, you are against us” world now???

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Angel
2013-05-25 10:47:43

he’s a decent guy just doing the best he can.

I started out as that but before 2008 election I wised up and voted for BB instead. Chris Matthews sums up my thoughts on Obama even in late 2008.

………………………………………..
President Obama “obviously likes giving speeches more than he does running the executive branch,” Chris Matthews said tonight.

Yes, you read that right: The MSNBC host who in 2008 felt a “thrill going up my leg” after hearing Obama speak has grown disenchanted. Tonight’s episode of Hardball saw Matthews delivering a rare, unforgiving grilling of the president as severe as anything that might appear on Fox News.

“What part of the presidency does Obama like? He doesn’t like dealing with other politicians — that means his own cabinet, that means members of the congress, either party. He doesn’t particularly like the press…. He likes to write the speeches, likes to rewrite what Favreau and the others wrote for the first draft,” Matthews said.

“So what part does he like? He likes going on the road, campaigning, visiting businesses like he does every couple days somewhere in Ohio or somewhere,” Matthews continued. “But what part does he like? He doesn’t like lobbying for the bills he cares about. He doesn’t like selling to the press. He doesn’t like giving orders or giving somebody the power to give orders. He doesn’t seem to like being an executive.”

Comment by Housing Angel
2013-05-25 10:49:44

He doesn’t like selling to the press.

Who knew Obama actually likes spying on press?

LOL what a fooking joke Obama has become.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:39:19

“I’m fully convinced that People are becoming deranged over their hatred of the President.”

I know right. It’s deranged to not adore a guy who spies on journalists and sends the IRS after his enemies.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:50:12

They were deranged before all of this stuff happened.

As far as the IRS is concerned, if you are an organization that advocates killing a buracracy like the IRS, it seems to me like you shouldn’t be surprised if the make sure all of your t’s are crossed, and i’s dotted.

What’s really funny is that they were applying for a tax exemption to begin with……organizations protesting about taxes, that aren’t paying any taxes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:56:19

Wow - your logic is like blaming a woman who got raped because she work too short a skirt.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 12:05:37

No, that’s your argument.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 12:17:05

Have you ever dealt with large organizations?

Calling it a POS (and indirectly, the people who work there POS as well), advocate for it’s termination, then applying to the same organization for bennies, is a good way to attract some extra scrutiny from said organization.

I’m sure that there are a bunch of people at the IRS who are convinced that government can’t function without a way to pay for things the government does. So, anyone coming along and advocating the destruction of the IRS is advocating a partial/complete destruction of the Federal government.

Calling people pieces of crap to their faces, then expecting them to do you favors never works. That’s just common sense.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 10:22:02

Modern day feudalism.

Hard to feel sorry for them. The majority of them voted away their freedoms and economic opportunities for an ever growing and ever expanding government.

They really think government’s going to “do stuff for them.”

—————————–

Millennials Won’t Be Debt Free Until They Die
RCM | 05/25/2013 | By Brian O’Connell

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — How bad have things gotten for millennials?

Their financial situation is so grim that they may never get completely out of debt — in their entire lives.

That’s the conclusion of a study from Ohio State University.

The real culprit is credit card debt, which tends to stifle economic growth of younger Americans, primarily because they pay it off so slowly, the OSU study says. But millennials are paying off all their debts so slowly they may accumulate credit card debt well into their 70s and die still owing, researcher say.

“If what we found continues to hold true, we may have more elderly people with substantial financial problems in the future,” says Lucia Dunn, a lead author of the study and an economics professor at Ohio State.

That dour sentiment comes from another study, this one from banking giant Wells Fargo, which has 54% of millennials saying it’s debt that keeps them up at night.

Another 42% of younger Americans say their debt is “overwhelming,” double the percentage of baby boomers who feel the same way. And 51% of millennials say they aren’t saving for retirement, primarily because they just don’t have enough extra cash to start a savings program. Any extra cash they do have needs to go to pay down debt, 81% of millennials say.

The trouble starts in their early 20s, with ever-skyrocketing student loan debt, Wells Fargo reports. More than 64% of millennials funded their college education through loans, compared with 29% of baby boomers. The report cites statistics from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which estimates total student loan debt topping $1 trillion last year, far and away the highest figure ever for U.S.-based college loans.

Comment by Combotechie
2013-05-25 10:44:17

“The majority voted away their freedoms and economic opportunities for an ever growing and ever expanding government.”

I agree the majority voted away their freedoms but I don’t agree it was to the government that they casted their votes.

Whenever they decided to spend money they didn’t have they decided to vote for “Modern day feudalism”, as you put it. They did this one dollar at a time, one vote at a time.

Pogo had it right. So did Barnum.

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:12:00

So did Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and Hitler.

But bonus points do go to Hitler.

He was elected, by the people, in one of the most culturally and technological advanced countries in the world (at the time).

By promising the German people free sh*t and all the good things the German government was going to do for them…

Comment by Combotechie
2013-05-25 11:24:45

Somehow I think you missed my point.

My point is: It was not the government that put these people is dire straits financially, it was themselves.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:22:04

Remember, the Republican plan is to create “economic opportunities” by eliminating the minimum wage, and have them pay off five-six figure student loan debts working a $5/hour McJobs.

And letting in thousands of H-1Bs, to fill all those “jobs that we can’t find qualified people to fill” (that will also work for $5/hour)

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:27:11

You totally have the republican nailed.

Only bigger and bigger government and higher and higher taxes can save us now…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:37:03

Don’t forget eating kittens and puppies. That’s a plank in the evil GOP platform. It was written by Haliburton’s CEO and the evil Koch Brothers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 11:42:55

I lived in Wichita for 20 years.

The Kochs aren’t interested in anything other than maximizing their take. Your basement could be flooded with six feet of their oil, and it would be your problem to deal with, if it were up to them.

All of those silly government rules, like safety and environmental rules, cost money to comply with.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:49:47

Don’t forget - And they also like starving kids and throwing grandma in the street.

I may have that backward - I can never keep it straight.

And they also want to put blacks back in chains.

I know it was the democrats who did that but no one studies history anyways (and it is such a good sound bite.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:50:30

“The Kochs aren’t interested in anything other than maximizing their take.”

You’re right. They should be more like Al Gore who made $250M profit selling his company to Arabs who got that money from pumping oil using near-slave labor. That’s how a business should be run.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:53:18

“Don’t forget - And they also like starving kids and throwing grandma in the street.

I may have that backward - I can never keep it straight.”

You don’t have it backwards, just incomplete.

They want to throw grandma AND kids in the street AND starve them both.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:59:55

That is almost like going straight to a triple dog dare…

You need to throw in stuff like “they want dirty air and dirty water for the children” FIRST.

They want to throw grandma AND kids in the street AND starve them both.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 12:03:28

So what’s your point?

Other than for every ten examples of Republican oligarchs/kleptocrats I can name, you can name 4-5 Democrats?

Usually the same ones all of the time……Gore, Soros, Clintons, Pelosi

These “you guys are bigger crooks than we are” arguments are tiresome.

For the record……I consider myself a moderate Republican, and believe that there is ample justification to put a few thousand politicians and business people in jail. Like Corzine.

The Republicans, being “Rule of Law” advocates, should be hammering Obama about his failure to prosecute Wall Street crooks, but are strangely silent on the matter.

Could it be because they are twin pigs of Obama, feeding at the same trough? Naah, can’t be that.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 12:19:21

Got it.

Republicans are baaaaaad because they are not hammering Obama enough for obama to do his job to prosecute Wall Street crooks.

But things would have been much, much worse if a republican won the last election.

And NOTHING is obama’s fault. It was such a big mess he inherited. But he is a really nice guy and he tries really, really hard.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 12:54:38

Now you are putting words in my mouth. Anything I’ve said about Republicans can be well documented, using their own words, and logical outcomes for the policies they advocate.

The only reason I voted for Obama in 2008, was the faint belief that he would put some of the banksters in jail. There was absolutely ZERO chance of that happening under McCain.

I’m done with voting, for anybody. The only thing that will dislodge the Vampire Squid class will be a massive military defeat suffered by the US.

I really don’t know what to think about you guys. Paid Republican shills? True believers in Free Market BS? 1%ers, who buy into “the 47% are parasites” meme? You seem believe that Republicans need to be running the show. I believe that Republican policies are a big reason this country is going straight down the crapper. Of course, I’m in the minority around here.

My current plan is to die early, preferably suddenly, so that the medical/insurance vampire squid doesn’t suck away all of my net worth, and leave some cash for the kids, because when the S finally HTF, I don’t really need to be around to say “Told you so”, and hard assets may mean the difference between the kids surviving, and not surviving.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-05-25 23:56:30

You’re on a roll today, Gulfie. But it’s pointless trying to hold a nuanced conversation with a shoulder parrot….

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-05-26 08:01:29

But it’s pointless trying to hold a nuanced conversation with a shoulder parrot….

Well said, Allena; I may have to steal that one… :-)

 
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-05-26 07:51:22

They did this one dollar at a time, one vote at a time.

+1. They chose to sell themselves into slavery, one dollar at a time…

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 11:25:01

Millenials laugh at the boomers and hope they will die alone. Yet millenials have a birth dearth among them and in 50 or 60 years they will see what it means when older people are laughed at for debilitating health.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-05-25 11:31:33

“That dour sentiment comes from another study, this one from banking giant Wells Fargo, which has 54% of millennials saying it’s debt that keeps them up at night.”

That’s amazing! I’m happy to report that I have very little debt (debt-to-income way under 100%) and little trouble sleeping at night.

Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:41:39

Reminds me of the Lending Tree commercial.

Help me - I am in debt up to my eyeballs…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0HX4a5P8eE

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:30:26

Eventually, we will all have to live within our means.

Even local, state and Federal governments.

—————————-

Hot Trend in Automobiles: Not Owning One
Paul Eisenstein - CNBC – Fri, May 24, 2013

Whether by choice or through financial reality, the percentage of American households without a car has doubled over the past two decades-and is now approaching 1 in 10.

The impact of this trend could be significant, especially when it comes to alternatives to driving, such as car-sharing and mass transit, according to research by CNW Marketing.

“While the recession was in large part responsible for the latest spurt, the trend was already clear,” said CNW’s research chief Art Spinella, “A growing number of Americans felt they didn’t need or want a personal car.”

The new research is in line with a separate study released last week by the U.S. Public Research Interest Group, or PIRG, which declared that, “the driving boom is over.” It noted a decline in the average household vehicle fleet, for one thing, and it found that millennial motorists are both waiting longer to get a driver’s license than previous generations and clocking fewer miles on the road.

CNW’s research found that it’s not a phenomenon limited to just millennials. The trend, said Spinella, is particularly noticeable among “both youngest and oldest Americans.”

“While the full impact of these trends are years away, we can see the formation of a future that includes more car-sharing, increased use of public transportation and diminishing status of owning a new vehicle,” said Spinella. “Again, this is years away-perhaps a decade-but the shift is clearly taking root.”

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 11:38:44

Going Galt except for student loans.

And what lender (without a government backing them up for ALL risks) gives a mortgage to a 75+ year old?

——————————————

Younger Americans: No House, No Car, Less Debt
21 Feb 2013 - John W. Schoen - CNBC

The bust that followed the epic borrowing binge of the late-2000s has apparently had a sobering effect on younger borrowers.

Americans under 35 are carrying substantially less debt than they were before the 2008 meltdown, according to an analysis released Thursday by The Pew Research Center. Still, they’ve also put off the big ticket purchases like cars and houses that are typically the main reasons for taking on debt.

There are several reasons younger households are carrying less debt than the generations that preceded them, said Richard Fry, a Pew senior economist.

“We know they’re going to school more, so that puts them into the job market later, and they’re postponing marriage and having kids later,” he said. “So if you marrying and having kids later, the urgency to buy a home and get a mortgage is also delayed as well.”

Until 2006, generations of young adult Americans had no reason to doubt the conventional wisdom that buying a house was a sure-fire investment.

However, the allure of home ownership was badly tarnished by the housing collapse. Since the bust, home ownership has become a financial albatross for millions of Americans who now owe their lender more than their house is worth. That collective “negative equity” now stands at about $1 trillion, according to figures released Thursday by Zillow.

The housing bust also knocked many younger households, who bought their first homes shortly before prices peaked in 2006, back into the rental market at greater rates than in the past, said Fry.

Younger Americans are also putting off borrowing to make other big-ticket purchases, including cars. In 2007, when credit was easy to get, nearly three out of four under-25 households had a car, the Pew researchers reported.

The one exception to younger Americans’ aversion to borrowing is student debt, which now stands at roughly $1 trillion outstanding. While more younger Americans are going to college and graduate school, financial aid has not kept up with rapidly rising tuitions. As a result, some 40 percent of younger households were carrying student debt in 2010, up from 34 percent in 2007.

The exception has been among the oldest Americans, who have seen their debt burden increase sharply since the 2007 recession began, according to an analysis from the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

For households aged 75 or older, the average debt burden essentially doubled to more than $27,000 in 2010. Debt payments, most of which went to paying off a mortgage, consumed 7.1 percent of income in 2010 – up from just 4.5 percent in 2007.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 12:21:50

The problem is, around here:

No car = No Job

Public transportation is essentially non-existant in Flyover.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-05-25 11:59:45

Memorial Day weekend and the temp is in the low 50s. Yesterday in the 40s.
Tell me more about this global warming…..

Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-25 12:01:10

It’s 85 in my neck of the woods.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-05-25 12:03:12

And last summer was hot as hell, our reservoirs and snow pack in the mountains are both low this year (which has become a trend out here). If this continues we will eventually be forced to ration water.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 12:27:59

You’ve gotta remember that these are also the guys who believe in “no need to divide the pie equitably, make the pie bigger”, in a resource-limited world.

Besides, it doesn’t matter what we do in the USA, unless India and China agree to buy-in to limiting greenhouse emissions. Anything we do here will just be more justification for moving what remains of the world’s industrial base there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-05-25 12:06:02

You are behind the times.

Any changes from what is perceived as “normal 70 degree sunny day weather” can be blamed on “climate change.”

Because we never has hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods or hot summer/cold winters before climate change.

The ONLY solution to climate change is bigger and bigger government and higher and higher taxes.

And liberals call religious folk ignorant :-/

Comment by X-GSfixr
2013-05-25 13:07:44

I’ll explain it simply.

Government ends up doing the stuff that the private sector deems unprofitable.

When the 1%ers demand and expect 7% ROI or more, that means a lot of things don’t get done by the private sector.

Sat in on a meeting with the CFO of our company. A proposal to build a new hangar, as a partner with the local FBO.

Our guys declined to invest, because a 3-4% return on a $3 million investment was too low.

And this is why our economy sucks. The only people who can promise 7% returns are the Wall Street squids, who get it by squeezing it out of other people’s returns.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 15:00:34

It must be 98 in Phoenix today. There’s your global warming and now I refuted you Smithers.

Oh, wait…!

Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-05-25 23:00:45

Yeah, it’s been a nice may so far in Phoenix, the night have just been spectacular.

 
 
Comment by howiewowie
2013-05-25 17:31:33

92 in my neck of the woods.

 
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-05-25 13:19:36

ATTENTION PROGRESSIVES

This aggression can not be allowed to stand.

—–

May 25, 2013

Libertarian movement gaining steam in New Hampshire

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/25/libertarian-movement-in-new-hampshire-10-years-later-successes-more-challenges/

Time to send in teams of attorneys, bus in the indigent from around the globe, have the radical college professors work overtime on indoctrination and ultimately win the race to fill local and state government with statist progressives.

I mean if one state goes off the reservation others could follow…Oh, the horror!!!

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-05-25 15:05:17

I would go there, but … It’s cold!

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post