June 10, 2013

Bits Bucket for June 10, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

355 Comments »

Comment by chilidoggg
2013-06-10 03:11:41

What does it mean to be a “menudo seller?”

Yes I know what menudo is.

Comment by chilidoggg
2013-06-10 03:14:23

Never mind.

“Go peddle that tripe…”

Comment by chilidoggg
2013-06-10 03:26:28

jeremiad: a prolonged lamentation or complaint; also : a cautionary or angry harangue

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 05:30:09

CRATER

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 04:11:31

mean to be a “menudo seller?”

It means you love Rock-n-Roll!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3We6cNH2jyk

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 04:32:05

Did Your Senator Vote to Expand the Government’s Spying Powers?
Senate votes that expanded the government’s surveillance powers, mapped.

By Chris Kirk|Posted Saturday, June 8, 2013, at 6:00 AM

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/map_of_the_week/2013/06/maps_senators_who_voted_to_expand_nsa_s_power.html?wpisrc=flyouts

Most of the Senators voted for all of the powers- especially the GOPsters- with a few mostly liberal holdouts.

Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 06:59:06

Don’t liberals want our children to be SAFE?

 
Comment by rms
2013-06-10 07:18:39

According to its website, NSA is not allowed to spy on Americans.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:21:15

Spare me. Charters are meant to be broken.

Aren’t the GSE’s suppose to “make housing more affordable”??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2013-06-10 13:40:46

“Spare me.”

Obviously you missed my sarcasm. :)

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 14:03:24

I caught it. My harsh sarcasm coming thru.

 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 07:48:01

But is it spying when private companies turn over the info?

Is it really the NSA spying when all the work is being done by private contractors like Dell Federal Services, Booz Allen Hamilton, GDIT, Computer Associates, etc.?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 08:11:56

But is it spying when private companies turn over the info?

I don’t think goog, yhoo,fb, etc will turn over the info without government “requesting” it?

work is being done by private contractors like Dell Federal Services, Booz Allen Hamilton,

Who pays them? Can contractors “experiment” and cross the boundary without government knowing it? I suppose it’s possible, but then again it speak a volume about the uselessness of the government than that of the contractors.

 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 11:52:02

The NSA is an arm of military. As such, they have no authorization to enforce the law in the United States. That would be a job for police and courts with, you know, ELECTED sheriffs and judges. duh.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:09:50

These politicians are the real terrorists. We need to take back our country. Arrest these crooks.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 10:02:02

But wait a minute, I thought only Liberals wanted big government? Or is this a case of “it’s only bad when THEY do it.”

/watches for our resident troll’s head to asplode

Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:07:07

No, what most liberals want is more enforcement and oversight of corporations who have bought and sold the government.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 14:58:53

Eco - we’re on the same page. That was my reaction to the idea that we spend so much on contractors for military and intelligence purposes. Funny how the same people that often decry “big government” are strangely silent when it comes to big government military and big government intel. It’s like they’re saying “It’s actually ok when we do it.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 08:03:59

The word menudo always means “occasionally”.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 08:04:59

s/always/also

 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 04:24:02

Bad news, Bill. :-(

The Shine Is Off
Paranoid investors pushed gold to $1,900 an ounce in 2011, but the bubble has burst.

By Nouriel Roubini|Posted Sunday, June 9, 2013, at 6:45 AM

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/project_syndicate/2013/06/gold_bubble_paranoid_investors_pushed_gold_to_1_900_an_ounce_in_2011_but.html

The run-up in gold prices in recent years—from $800 an ounce in early 2009 to above $1,900 in the fall of 2011—had all the features of a bubble. And now, like all asset-price surges that are divorced from the fundamentals of supply and demand, the gold bubble is deflating.

At the peak, gold bugs—a combination of paranoid investors and others with a fear-based political agenda—were happily predicting gold prices going to $2,000, $3,000, and even to $5,000 in a matter of years. But prices have moved mostly downward since then. In April, gold was selling for close to $1,300 per ounce—and the price is still hovering below $1,400, an almost 30 percent drop from the 2011 high.

There are many reasons why the bubble has burst, and why gold prices are likely to move much lower, toward $1,000 by 2015.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2013-06-10 09:10:35

One thing about a forecast that you can be sure of is this: it will be wrong.

Forecasts are estimates. The more exact a forecast is, the higher the probability that it will be incorrect.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 04:43:17

Too funny…

———–

States consider fees for hybrids to recoup lost gasoline taxes
fuelfix.com | June 9 2013 | AP

North Carolina is joining a growing number of states exploring new fees for hybrid and electric car owners to help make up for revenue those drivers aren’t paying in gas taxes on their fuel-efficient vehicles.

The proposal strikes many owners of alternative-fuel vehicles and some advocacy groups as a wrong-headed approach to balancing priorities of promoting U.S. energy independence with sustainable infrastructure funding. But policymakers and some experts argue taxing hybrid and electric vehicle owners is a matter of making sure all drivers help maintain the roads they use and construct new ones.

Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2013-06-10 05:05:38

‘ But policymakers and some experts argue taxing hybrid and electric vehicle owners is a matter of making sure all drivers help maintain the roads they use and construct new ones.’

Love it. Maybe hybrid drivers can organize a no-drive day or a some other type of boycott. Of all places, NC ? I thought their economy was going gangbusters.

Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 06:30:02

Wouldn’t a no-drive day have opposite the intended effect? The savings in road wear-and-tear more than offsets the loss in gas tax revenue (duh, that’s why they want the extra fees in the first place). By that reasoning, the government would WANT a hybrid boycott day.

I can see why NC would want to do this. The gas tax isn’t really a gas tax; it’s a road repair tax. When everybody was using gasoline, the two were the same. But now, an electric car effectively tears up the roads for free. If anything, the road government should be asking the environmental government for the fees, since it’s the environmental government which is ostensibly reaping the benefits of cars using less gas.

I see a slippery slope here. My Corolla uses half the gas of a Ford F-350; in fact my milage is not much lower than a hybrid. Does my Corolla tear up the road half as much? If I tear up the road more than my gas tax is worth, should they ask for a extra fee from me?

Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 06:55:24

Kinda like the same logic of the government using cigarette taxes to fund health care?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 07:03:56

The most efficient and fair way to do this is pay by miles driven and weight of the car and remove the gas tax all together. If you drive 10K miles in a Corolla you pay $X a year to register the car. If you drive 10K miles in an F150 you pay 2X. If you drive 20K miles in an F150, you pay 4X. And so on. Gas mileage really should have nothing to do with how much damage your car does to roads.

People will whine that the govt then knows how much you drive. As long as they don’t know WHERE I drive, I don’t really care. And in most states cars need an inspection to register, so the state already knows mileage every year already.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 07:36:17

As long as they don’t know WHERE I drive, I don’t really care.

Among car enthusiasts the fear is that then they (and your insurance company) will know HOW FAST you drive. But luckily in the USA we respect privacy when it comes to data collection so that shouldn’t be an issue.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 07:43:24

will know HOW FAST you drive.

They essentially know this already, with their on-board computers, no? But I don’t see how seeing your yearly mileage will reveal how fast you drive.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 07:54:10

They essentially know this already, with their on-board computers, no?

The car knows how fast you are going and some of the latest cars may keep a rolling log and record that if the airbag goes off, but they don’t transmit the information outside the car yet, as far as I know. The assumption is that if they start charging by mileage that they will transmit that continuously to avoid odometer trickery, and once that begins they might as well transmit evidence of law breaking at the same time.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 08:05:32

They say the annoying thing about self-driving cars is they will not break the speed limit.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 08:57:48

Carl, what about the GPS systems? They know where you are, they display the speed limit of whatever road you’re on, and they calculate how long it will take to arrive at a destination, presumably using all the speed limits along the way. Does the GPS unit know which license plate it’s attached to?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 09:03:28

The GPS I’m familiar with is only a receiver of satellite signals and uses them to calculate. I’m not familiar with ones that transmit any information.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:13:56

Now Slithers, who blows hard about overreaching government, wants the government to track our mileage. Classic.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 10:32:25

Remember: Big government is only bad if they do it. When we create a big government standing army larger then the next twelve largest countries combined, why that’s just hunky dory. Nope, no problem with big government there.

/keep your government hands off my medicare

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-06-10 13:38:20

Let’s say you consider yourself a statist progressive…How far do you want to go? What are we progressing towards? What does utopia look like? I really want to know.

 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 13:52:30

The GPS I’m familiar with is only a receiver of satellite signals and uses them to calculate. I’m not familiar with ones that transmit any information.”

if its the GPS in your cell phone it can transmitt info , maybe you won’t even know its doing it ?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 13:59:58

if its the GPS in your cell phone it can transmitt info , maybe you won’t even know its doing it ?

That’s true, the phone could send. In fact, that might be a good way around all the car issues if they just used that to figure out how many miles you were really driving each day. That way they could get those pesky walkers and bikers tearing up the roads, too.

 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 14:14:53

That way they could get those pesky walkers and bikers tearing up the roads, too.”

it should go by weight of your vehicle as well as miles driven. Miles driven is gas used I don’t know why they feel they need to track miles ? its just BS

Electric car has to charged and I’m sure utilites add taxes.

In the desperate need of all Government both local and federal for more money I expect all kinds of reasons fees and taxes should go up on the average joe who can’t fight back.

first they make you feel guilty about some problem then they add a tax to make it right.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-06-10 15:00:24

once that begins they might as well transmit evidence of law breaking at the same time.
At one time one of the toll roads in the NE US would fine truckers who presented a toll ticket indicating they had exceeded the road’s speed limits between the entrance ramp and the exit ramp. No fancy shmancy electronic gizmos either, just the stamped ticket & the fact that the trucker got there.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-06-10 15:27:25

Let’s say you consider yourself a statist progressive…

Nobody actually considers himself to be a statist progressive. Statist is one of those silly words used by Rush Limbaugh fans who generally can’t define what it means when you ask them.

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2013-06-10 07:37:46

common sense and fair…just leveling the playing field.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 07:00:02

Liberal logic is fascinating to observe.

I remember when I was a kid, the libs went on an anti-paper bag campaign. Use plastic bags at the grocery store to save the trees!!! So everyone started using plastic bags. Fast forward 20 years, now the same people are pushing plastic bag bans in places like Austin and Seattle and coming soon to a city near you in order to save….I don’t even know what they’re trying to save anymore.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:05:36

Slippery Slithers,

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-06-10 07:19:24

It’s a commie plot.

China’s plastic-bag ban turns five years old
http://grist.org/news/chinas-plastic-bag-ban-turns-five-years-old/

A plastic bag ban launched five years ago has cut consumption by at least 67 billion bags, saving an equivalent of 6 million tonnes of oil, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said Friday.
Since the ban was implemented, use of plastic bags has dropped by more than two-thirds, said Li Jing, vice chief of energy-saving and environmental protection department under the NDRC, China’s top economic planner.

* Story says they switched to thinner bags :)

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:21:34

It’s funny how liberals always say we should like like other countries.

OK let’s do what China does:

- no minimum wage
- no OSHA
- no EPA
- no Obamacare

Or let’s be like France
- 80% of energy should come from noo-cular power

Great. Let’s do it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 10:41:31

Who are these straw-man liberals you keep talking about? I live in Seattle, have visited multiple Unitarian churches, taken my kid on protest marches against big government wars, and attended Hempfest at least half a dozen times, and I’ve never met the people you continuously describe as liberals.

The people I know who call themselves liberals are NOTHING like the ones you describe. They hate big government probably more than you do, especially if you acknowledge the Military industrial piece of it.

Face reality - you’re living in a fictional bubble created by Rupert Murdoch. It’s time for you to go nitey nite and let the grownups talk.

 
 
 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-06-10 13:45:01

“I remember when I was a kid, the libs went on an anti-paper bag campaign. Use plastic bags at the grocery store to save the trees!!! So everyone started using plastic bags. Fast forward 20 years, now the same people are pushing plastic bag bans in places like Austin and Seattle and coming soon to a city near you in order to save….I don’t even know what they’re trying to save anymore.”

You are absolutely spot on with that comment. You will get nothing but attacks, but you are spot on…I saw the same thing happen in the late 80’s in California. The sad part is that they (progressives) get away with it time and time again, then when challenged pretend it never happened.

 
 
 
Comment by Ryan
2013-06-10 04:48:19

Commander in Chief on the campaign trail 2007:

“One of my first acts as president is going to be call in my new attorney general to review every single executive order that’s been issued… to overturn those that are undermining the Constitution, undermining our civil liberties, that are promoting this cockamamie theory of Unitary government, that says that somehow the executive branch does not need to obey the Constitution”

He went on to say this:

“…if it’s determined that laws have been broken, then obviously accountability would be part of my Attorney General’s job”

Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 07:01:29

He lies almost as purty as ol’ Bill Clinton.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-06-10 07:37:45

to overturn those that are undermining the Constitution, undermining our civil liberties,

BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAAHAHAHA!!!!!

(sniff)

Wow, that was rich…

 
 
Comment by Lip
2013-06-10 04:54:08

Hugh Hewitt: What part of ‘no fence, no deal’ does the Senate GOP not get?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/hugh-hewitt-what-part-of-no-fence-no-deal-does-the-senate-gop-not-get/article/2531443

Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 05:48:39

No deal, period. Not now, not ever. What was it I quoted yesterday? They’re only here because members of government want to pit them against the native populace.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 06:33:43

Do you really think it’s “members of the government” who are picking up these folks in the Home Depot parking lot?

Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 06:42:28

If the situation wasn’t allowed and encouraged by government, there would be no illegals to pick up in the Home Depot parking lot. And at our local Home Depot, there’s no pick up location anyway. So they don’t congregate. But they do shop there, which is what Home Depot wants in the first place.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 08:10:44

True, but as the late Walt Kelly said, through his creation Pogo: “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

http://www.jimandnancyforest.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/04/Pogo.jpg

We bitch and moan about illegals, then we hire them to mow our lawns, weed our gardens and scrub our toilets.

 
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 08:27:24

If you support Social Security and the debt based consumer economy, you need more people period. Immigration is a very effective way to recruit future debtors.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:18:31

Too many lazy slobs in this country, unwilling to even clean their own houses and care for their own yards. Disgusting.

 
Comment by Montana
2013-06-10 18:26:51

we hire them to mow our lawns, weed our gardens and scrub our toilets.

“We”? Speak for yourself dude.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-06-10 20:07:44

“We”? Speak for yourself dude.

+1. I prefer to scrub my own toilet…

 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 11:58:13

No oxide, but the government is facilitating the behavior. It should be enforcing the law.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:52:12

The GOP “experts” and “consultants” have said amnesty is needed to win Hispanic votes. So the GOP will give create 20 million new life-long Democrat voters with amnesty. And this action will magically mean the GOP wins Hispanic voters.

GOP: The Stupid Party that gets stupider daily.

Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 07:03:22

Build your party around people that believe in sky wizards, and this will happen.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 07:35:36

yup. Bobby Jindal nailed it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 13:17:48

FWIW, there are plenty of people of faith in the Democratic Party too. I know the GOP likes to paint the Dems as Club Atheist, but that isn’t the case.

Maybe what you should have said was “Build your party around fundamentalists …”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 08:12:46

GOP: The Stupid Party that gets stupider daily.

They can’t see past the cheap labor.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:24:31

I don’t buy that. Illegal labor isn’t that cheap to begin with.

Amnesty is a political beast not an economic beast. The power than be have decided amnesty is needed to win Hispanic votes. Never mind that amnesty will produce 20 million life long Democrats. McCain, admitted to this but said let’s do it anyway because not doing it is even worse.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 08:46:13

Why doesn’t the GOP propose to make them legal but make citizenship much much tougher like in many countries?

I know the courts will probably disallow this but I think it’s worth a shot. Ileegals would gladly take it IMO.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:21:23

“I don’t buy that. Illegal labor isn’t that cheap to begin with.”

Then you’re a blithering idiot. It saves large corporations billions, and passes the burden onto the American taxpayer.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 09:24:54

I don’t buy that. Illegal labor isn’t that cheap to begin with.

Yes it is. Just look at the meatpacking plants. They used to union and paid a living wage. They used illegals to bust the unions and now they pay minimum wage.

Flood the market with bodies and wages go down. Plus illegals don’t get bennies either.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:27:14

That’s the game. Flood the market with labor to lower wages. The savings goes towards massive bonuses and new yachts for the greedy pigs.

 
Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-10 10:15:32

“meatpacking plants”

And construction.

Back before the great meltdown, most of the local roofing contractors were going out of business.

All of the illegals were undercutting their price by 50% or better. One gal I know paid $4K to “someone her son-in-law knew” to her house re-roofed, when all of the local guys with addresses and phone numbers were bidding it at 10K.

She was selling the place, so she didn’t care about the quality. All she cared about was being able to say the place had a “new roof”.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 12:43:53

And the illegals are oftentimes not licensed, don’t pay taxes, etc. They even dump their scrap in the rural areas instead of paying dump fees. It’s despicable.

 
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 10:59:26

Now THAT is the most intelligent thing you’ve ever posted.

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-06-10 09:08:14

• The Great Wall Of China was built around 200 BC. It ranges anywhere from 3889 miles to 13171 miles.

• The US-Mexico border is 1969 miles long.

To suggest a border fence is technologically infeasible (as the government did when they started firehosing money at the “virtual fence” which managed to get 53 miles before being shut down as a 1 billion dollar failure) means modern US technology is inferior to 2300 year old Chinese technology.

The assertion that a border fence is technologically infeasible is absurd on its face.

Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:32:32

Good fences make good neighbors.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-06-10 09:44:57

I have doubts about a border fence. Even if we repealed NAFTA, which I’d like to see, these local economies are intertwined. That’s one reason we have a 50-150 buffer zone where people can come and go both ways on a short term basis. You’d have to do away with that. And it would be very expensive. The most important thing about a fence is, why do you think a government that refuses to enforce current laws is suddenly going to make a fence work?

I used to prepare payrolls. I can guarantee you that we could identify illegal workers by their payroll data. We have a law saying we can fine employers $10,000 per illegal employee. It just isn’t enforced. In fact the feds actively encourage illegal workers! Look at how they sued Arizona for making baby steps in curtailing government payments to illegals and daring to question people who have been arrested.

In short, eliminating illegal employment in the US would be astonishingly easy, using existing laws.

Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-10 10:22:53

There is absolutely no point in building a fence, if nobody plans on enforcing the immigration laws. Someone must be getting kickbacks on building a fence. (Carlysle Group? )

Throw a few hundred suits in jail for hiring illegals, and the problem will fix itself.

Better yet…..start suing/filing criminal charges on employers that hire illegals, who subsequently cause mayhem (murders, killing people while DWI, etc.). Call it “conspiracy”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 11:45:38

Throw the Job Creators in jail? Are you mad?!

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:02:03

Exactly.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-06-10 18:20:05

Laws can be easily gamed. Physical barriers cannot.

If we could secure the border, then we could finally discuss an arrangement which would mutually beneficial to both societies. Without control of the border, discussing illegal immigration solutions is a purely theoretical exercise.

 
 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 10:57:31

I think you’re right. We don’t even need a fence. By penalizing the companies who hire illegal workers, and refusing social benefits to non-citizens, they would all disappear.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2013-06-10 11:03:34

the anchor baby thing going away would help too.

 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 11:44:24

You have to man that fence, or it won’t keep anybody out.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 12:00:54

A fence would also cause a lot of ecological problems.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by mathguy
2013-06-10 14:19:46

Instead of trying to keep people out, we should be welcoming them in, and encouraging EVERYONE to stay off the public dole, even if it means working low wage jobs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 16:45:00

Do these immigrants bring along a job in each pocket?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-06-10 16:45:25

mathguy,

As I’ve mentioned here many times I lived 30 miles from Matamoros on the Texas side for 5 years. When I moved there, I was a full believer in open borders. By the time I left, I had completely turned around on the subject. This was an area in the buffer zone. Many Mexican nationals could live there without being noticed or deported. I read the papers, went to Mexico often, pretty much dived into the whole scene. I learned that 85% of the health care in that zone was provided by some form of US/state/local government. Welfare is not taken with any shame at all. This isn’t a racial thing; it’s cultural because of the crushing poverty south of the border, where many tens of millions live on a couple dollars a day or less. I eventually agreed with the position that open borders with Mexico are incompatible with a welfare state. If we allowed it, there would be 40-50 maybe 70 million immigrants into the US in months. The state of Mexico would gladly provide the buses to speed things along.

I also looked into living in Mexico. (This was pre-drug cartel violence for that part of Mexico). Nope. The government will only let you live there if you can prove a hefty fixed income; you can’t get a job to pay your way. And even then, you have to renew with them regularly, again proving you have this fixed income.

Mexico is exporting their poverty and unemployment into the US, and along with it social unrest. IMO, we should insist these people largely stay in Mexico and fix that seriously broken country themselves from within.

 
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2013-06-10 21:49:53

How are you going to get a 20′ fence into the middle of the Rio Grande and keep it there as the river shifts course?

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 04:56:42

Too, too, too, too, too funny…

——————-

Edward Snowden: I mistakenly believed in Obama’s promises
Washington Examiner | Sunday June 9, 2013

Edward Snowden, the self-revealed whistle-blower at the National Security Agency, explains that part of the reason he decided to come forward was because President Obama did not roll back the surveillance measures put into place by the Bush Administration.

“But I believed in Obama’s promises. I was going to disclose it [but waited because of his election]. He continued with the policies of his predecessor.”

Snowden acknowledged that he watched Obama struggle as he attempted to justify the surveillance programs during his press conference on Friday.

Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 05:35:01

I watched the interview. I must say, he seems like a remarkable young man, I don’t think I would ever have had the courage to do what he did.

They want to jail him.

They should be honoring him. He’s probably done more for the citizens of the US in that one interview than any of the worthless, despicable members of congress have done in their entire terms.

Comment by CharlieTango
2013-06-10 06:18:48

They want to jail him.

Intelligence officials overheard joking about how NSA leaker should be ‘disappeared’ after handing classified documents to press

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2338418/Steve-Clemons-leak-Intelligence-officials-overheard-joking-NSA-leaker-disappeared-handing-classified-documents-press.html

Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 06:46:48

Big brave men, eh? Bawh-hawh-hawh. Says a lot about the folks in charge, doesn’t it?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:48:15

friggin cowards. Every one of them.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:23:21

They are terrorists. Every last one of them. Same with the politicians. We are under a domestic terrorist attack.

 
 
Comment by michael
2013-06-10 08:06:08

so much for “we the people”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-06-10 08:07:37

They want to jail him.

They should be honoring him.

+infinity.

I was impressed by how articulate he was; he seemed quite thoughtful, and his actions seemed remarkably considered.

I wish I would have as much courage of my convictions, but I suspect otherwise; the notion of the intelligence community hunting me down for rendition or something similar would be too much to risk.

Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:25:11

He sacrificed his life for us. We should do something for this young man.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 11:25:53

He is Hesus?

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 11:44:00

Better. He’s ultimately standing up for your freedom.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 12:47:08

“He is Hesus?”

You mean “hay-soos?”

 
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 10:57:28

So here we have segments of the current government caught red handed in the most widespread and blatant violation of both constitutional letter and principles in history, and listening to the “news” outlets, the real problem apparently is that the information was leaked.

Nevermind the blatant betrayal - dare I sat treason? - committed against out nation. The problem is that it was leaked.

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:05:03

Yeah, Obama promised us more transparency, but he didn’t say into whose affairs, so it wasn’t exactly a lie. We don’t get transparency into the official affairs of the government; they get transparency into the private affairs of citizens. Unreal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-06-10 12:52:05

We all seem to be having problems understanding that Technology is relentlessness and soulless. Every day the network grows and we will become even more dependent on it. Not just as individuals but ultimately as a species.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 14:24:21

That has nothing to do with the legal question of whether or not the military has the right to collect and record all of our private electronic communications.

There was a time when people used pens and paper. The King and Queen used to send armed thugs into their houses to confiscate the paper, and then they would read it. We made it illegal for a reason.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 14:53:11

Just out of curiousity - does anyone know what kind of take the Murdoch network(FoxNews) has on this?

I can’t begin to express how sickened I am that the “big issue” according to every major news place I’ve looked at today is basically that someone talked about this, not the outrage that is a government willfully violating the fourth amendment on an unbelievably huge scale.

They(major media) must be completely bought and paid for at this point, considering how they’ve been under the screws lately over receiving leaks.

There are no words….

 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-06-10 18:11:15

“There are no words….”
So technology keeps advancing while we are outraged a 200+ year old law can’t stop it. Let’s deal with the ethical challenges of where technology is going now. We need a new constitution written with a 21st. century vocabulary.
Corporations are not people.
Artificial Intelligence entities could have rights.
The State can not terminate humans but could suspend them.
Suicide is a right.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-06-10 22:03:49

Thank you, Blue.

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 05:37:47

Well since we’re on politics today:

Republican IRS agent says Cincinnati began ‘Tea Party’ inquiries

“A U.S. Internal Revenue Service manager, who described himself as a conservative Republican, told congressional investigators that he and a local colleague decided to give conservative groups the extra scrutiny that has prompted weeks of political controversy.

In an official interview transcript released on Sunday by Democratic Representative Elijah Cummings, the manager said he and an underling set aside “Tea Party” and “patriot” groups that had applied for tax-exempt status because the organizations appeared to pose a new precedent that could affect future IRS filings.

Issa vowed to press ahead with the investigation and said the IRS manager’s comments ‘did not provide anything enlightening or contradict other witness accounts.’ ”

The excerpts of interviews with IRS workers released by Cummings indicate that the IRS manager and an underling first decided to contact Washington, D.C. IRS officials for guidance on the cases from groups aligned with the anti-tax Tea Party movement.

They did so to consolidate them, as they might be precedent-setting for future cases, the manager said, according to the interview transcripts.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/09/us-usa-irs-scrutiny-idUSBRE9580A820130609

——————–

Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 05:59:43

So what does the liberal media mean by “scrutiny?” Scrutiny because of the political affiliation or scrutiny because the cases might be precedent-setting?

 
Comment by Charlie Tango
2013-06-10 07:52:26

“I strongly disagree with Ranking Member Cummings’ assertion that we know everything we need to know about inappropriate targeting of Tea Party groups by the IRS and the case is, in his word, ’solved.’ His extreme and reckless assertions are a signal that his true motivation is stopping needed Congressional oversight and he has no genuine interest in working, on a bipartisan basis, to expose the full truth,” Issa said in a statement released to the press.
“The American public wants to know why targeting occurred and who was involved. The testimony excerpts Ranking Member Cummings revealed today did not provide anything enlightening or contradict other witness accounts. The only thing Ranking Member Cummings left clear in his comments today is that if it were up to him the investigation would be closed. Fortunately, the decision to close the investigation is not his to make. Both House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp and I are committed to leading a fact based investigation that fully exposes all relevant facts about IRS efforts to target Americans for their political beliefs.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/09/Rep-Issa-blasts-Cummings

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:50:01

“But I believed in Obama’s promises”

HA HA HA HA

Good one.

So we know this guy’s not very smart.

Comment by polly
2013-06-10 06:57:12

You sure you want to go there?

Edward Snowden apparently a Ron Paul supporter

By Aaron Blake, Published: June 10, 2013 at 8:41 am

The man responsible for some of the most significant national security leaks in American history is apparently a Ron Paul supporter.

Campaign finance records show an “Edward Snowden” who appears to be the leaker contributed $250 to Paul’s presidential campaign twice in 2012.

The first donation came from an address in Columbia, Md., in March 2012, while the second came from Waipahu, Hawaii, two months later.

The first contribution describes the donor as an employee of Dell, a company Snowden has done contract work for in recent years. Snowden is from Maryland, and most recently for Booz Allen Hamilton in Hawaii.

In addition, Snowden told the Guardian that he supported a third-party candidate for president in 2008. Paul is closely allied with the libertarian movement and ran for president as the Libertarian Party nominee in 1988. For decades, Paul has been a vocal opponent of government intrusion into people’s lives.

Other men named Edward Snowden have made political contributions in recent years, but none appear to match the profile of the man who identified himself as the leaker.

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 08:17:20

Campaign finance records show an “Edward Snowden” who appears to be the leaker contributed $250 to Paul’s presidential campaign twice in 2012.

The first donation came from an address in Columbia, Md., in March 2012, while the second came from Waipahu, Hawaii, two months later.

Sounds like a resonable guy. Only a numbskull would support and vote for Obama again in 2012.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2013-06-10 10:06:59

My point was that bananas wanted to paint the guy as an idiot for “trusting” the President. If bananas insists that the guy is an idiot for one political belief that he once held, why are his other political beliefs any different?

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:28:14

So he believed Obama and donated to Ron Paul.

Wow. Gullible twice over.

If this is the caliber of people working at the CIA/NSA, I am starting to feel very unsafe.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:55:22

He worked for Booz Allen Hamilton. And yes, it is the caliber. Junior level employees there make more than even the most senior fed employees.

Private sector, baby! Learn to love it. They are the ones reading our emails.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:08:00

Speaking of caliber, do you realize that this man is a high school dropout? He was discharged from the army because he broke both legs during training. In other words, he was not the creme-de-la-creme. Do you think they hire guys like that for a reason? Looks like they made a mistake when asseessing this one.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-06-10 20:06:27

Speaking of caliber, do you realize that this man is a high school dropout?

Careful how you paint with that brush.

I have worked with more then one wicked-smart high school dropout, at large tech firms whose names you would know. And they have been some of the best people I’ve worked with.

Not everyone fits well into the regimented school system. That doesn’t necessarily mean that they aren’t both smart and capable.

 
 
 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:44:42

“So we know this guy’s not very smart.”

I am not sure you have the mental capacity to understand intelligence.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-06-10 15:47:26

So we know this guy’s not very smart.”

Why does it matter how smart he is? How is that relevant to anything of importance in this matter?

 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 08:51:16

Edward Snowden, I bet China gives him up to the US government or China lets him travel to another country just to get rid of him.

he is in Hong Kong now

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 09:38:15

It’s a PR coup for China….China will keep him and US can’t do $hit about it.

 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 05:04:01

you will never loose money with housing. never

Comment by azdude
2013-06-10 05:28:49

buy a house today and get a loan modification tomorrow?

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 07:25:32

buy a house today, open a heloc tomorrow, and get a modification for your wife’s breasts on wednesday.

Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 11:49:13

Always a bad idea. If your wife is asking to get her boobs done, it’s for the benefit of the next guy. Even worse if she gets you to think it’s YOUR idea.

Caveat emptor.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2013-06-10 06:58:33

+1 HELOC your home and put the money in the stock market. Winner!

 
 
Comment by goon squad
Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 05:44:05

Did you even see the interview, goon? That’s one brave soul there.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 06:56:19

He means that the guy is a private contractor (as are overwhelming majority of the people listening to and intercepting private communications) and he’s “biting the hand that feeds him”.

BTW, this guy is 29, has a few yrs in this type of work (4 or 5) and was making 200k. LOL @ our country for letting private companies abuse us like this. I routinely see complete hack contractors makign 400k, 500k, etc. Upper management pushing 1MM easily.

Privitization, people. Learn to love it. It’s a big part of what makes Washington go ’round these days. There’s no profit to be made when you have ACTUAL gov’t employees doing gov’t type work. No, you need to have private contractors involved… it gets Congress all excited (campaign contributions, baby!) and all the “expertise” is in the private sector, right? Right? They certainly have pure motives!

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 07:12:42

keep schooling the hbb on this subject, please.

and remember, feds drool, contractors RULE!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ahansen
2013-06-10 22:23:10

+1, joe. You’re HBB’s own whistleblower and it’s greatly appreciated by some of us.

 
 
Comment by ethan in norfolk va
2013-06-10 08:16:27

Uhm where do I apply for lame gov’t contract gig that pays $400k?

Or are those only for ex-govt people “retiring.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 08:56:08

Read here to learn about the “pay cap” for private contractors. Or just run a google search.

http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2011/12/14/ndaa-executive-compensation-benchmark.aspx

I have to read bid proposals wh en preparing bid protests. I see what the proposed salary grades are for private contractors. And on big contracts, private contractors *routinely* bill FTEs at $500k+ for the type of work performed by mid-level fed gov’t employees. Like, it’s so routine it’s not even a big deal, everyone is doing it. Federal gov’t employees definitely do not come out ahead in the long run. There is just as much security, once you have a security clearance, to work for a private contractor. Only an idiot would choose to be a fed. Even if your employer loses the bidding the next time around, the new contractor virtually always offers all the incumbents’ employees to stay on.

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:11:36

I have seen a lot of job postings for government contractors. Most of them basically require you to be a veteran. At the same time, the military is hostile toward women. You know that wage gap between men and women? How much you wanna bet 50% of it comes from government contracts?

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:30:22

Option 1: $200K a year as a contractor

Option2: $150K a year, 8 weeks paid vacation, every holiday off, retires are 50 with a $100K pension as a govt employee

The govt worker still comes out ahead in the long run.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 08:50:51

The Option 2 scenario is available only for old-school Feds.

And BTW, we are currently hiring. A few of the senior Fed staff here are retiring soon, and because of the hiring freeze, they will be replaced with contractors.

Bill in Los Angeles = WIN

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 08:52:26

You’re not comparing apples to apples.

Apples to apples comparison is someone like Polly making $150k vs. partners at my firm making 500k+.

Apples to apples would be a military officer making under 100k vs. this private contractor kid making 200k.

Private contractors cost much, much more than equivalent job grade federal employees.

Federal employee managers make 150-200k.

Private contractor managers make 400k+ easily. Recent legislation has attempted to cap them at $750k/yr. We’ll see if that holds up.

There are thousands of private contractor managers who are currently paid *over* $750k/yr, which is the reason the cap has been sought.

Note, private contractor mangers will still be able to make more than $750k, but the federal gov’t will only contribute $750k.

 
Comment by polly
2013-06-10 12:40:31

“Option2: $150K a year, 8 weeks paid vacation, every holiday off, retires are 50 with a $100K pension as a govt employee”

Exactly what group of government employees have this deal? 8 weeks of paid vacation? Some teachers are allowed to have their 10 month salaries paid out over 12 months, but that isn’t the same as 8 weeks of paid vacation. Feds don’t get 8 weeks. 100K pension is 67% of $150K. Nobody who started working for the federal government since 1986 (I think, might be earlier in the 80s) has been able to earn more than a 40% pension and that requires 40 years (or more) of service. So to retire on 40% after 40 years would mean starting as a fed when you are 10 years old. Even under the old system, getting 66% would mean 33 years of service so to retire at 50 would mean working for the government since you were 17.

Do you have fun making up this stuff, or do you really not know that it isn’t true?

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:18:34

Slithers, like cabana boy, are both paid trolls and don’t give damn if we know it or not.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-06-10 15:06:20

Do you have fun making up this stuff, or do you really not know that it isn’t true?
The answer is YES.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 08:54:53

BTW, this guy is 29, has a few yrs in this type of work (4 or 5) and was making 200k.”

even more than a CA state safety worker

I guess when you don’t need to make a profit you can spend and pay whatever you can get away with

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 08:58:53

Option2: $150K a year, 8 weeks paid vacation, every holiday off, retires are 50 with a $100K pension as a govt employee”

Option 3 : 90K a year, 2 weeks vacation, 5 holidays off, no retirment no pension as a bounus get to compete with H1B visa workers private industry high tech worker

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 09:41:08

Option 4: $20k per year, 1 week vacation, no benefits.

Option 5: $14k per year unemployment benefits.

Option 6: Unemployed, no benefits, suicidal.

 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 14:00:12

while these other options are compelling I still like option 2 the best

 
Comment by nickpapageorgio
2013-06-10 14:18:21

Option 6 should be 40k in food stamps and welfare benefits (including EITC). Tough call, but suicide should be next in line :)

 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2013-06-10 11:05:02

Was he making $200K or was Booz Allen billing for him at $200K?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 12:04:55

Can we have congresscritters who actually run government well instead of giving up and selling out to whatever contractor makes the biggest campaign contribution? If we could get thta we’d really appreciate it.

Thanks,
The American People

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 12:46:14

Commie talk!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:20:13

http://www.theonion.com/articles/american-people-hire-highpowered-lobbyist-to-push,18204/

WASHINGTON—Citing a desire to gain influence in Washington, the American people confirmed Friday that they have hired high-powered D.C. lobbyist Jack Weldon of the firm Patton Boggs to help advance their agenda in Congress.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 15:06:05

Damn eco, that’s a great idea - why didn’t I think of that? If only there was some way we could fire the people in congress every few years or so….

 
Comment by tresho
2013-06-10 15:18:59

we could fire the people in congress every few years or so….
We could, but we don’t and we won’t.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 18:00:10

Exactly. We can and we don’t.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 05:20:53

“Why get ripped off on these massively inflated asking prices of resale housing? Rent for half the monthly amount and buy later after prices crater for 65% less.”

Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 11:00:24

Renting cannot provide riches through the magic of house price appreciation. Get with the program.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 05:25:02

As one of our more notable observers recently stated, “Renting is money in the bank at current massively inflated asking prices of resale housing.”

Comment by azdude
2013-06-10 05:30:18

renting is like p@ssing into the wind.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:00:48

And the best part about renting? It’s half the price of buying.

Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 06:07:00

My mortgage is renting money from the bank.
My property taxes is renting land from the government.
Those two rents together cost $1000 less per month than renting the same property from a landlord.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:09:35

And when you add the rest of your costs in?

It’s twice the amount you could have rented for.

Donkey.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:27:06

“My mortgage is renting money from the bank.
My property taxes is renting land from the government.
Those two rents together cost $1000 less per month than renting the same property from a landlord.”

And you get to deduct both of these rents from your taxes, while a renter cannot. Depending on your marginal tax rate that $1000 can be as low as $700 when taking the deduction into account.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:29:53

Slithers,

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 06:39:50

Smithers, do you mean “as high as $1300?”

Pimp/Analyst, you’d be hard pressed to find $1000 of “extra costs” per month, even with big-ticket maintenance.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:41:19

You’re going to find out just how easy it is. Just keep deferring Junkie.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:47:50

“Smithers, do you mean “as high as $1300?”

Not sure what you mean.

I mean you pay $1000. You deduct $1000. So your after tax cost is $700 (assuming your combined federal/state marginal tax rate is 30%).

As for other costs, $1000 a month? LOL Pimpy. You are deranged.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:49:26

Refute it then. You won’t because you can’t. You can’t because it’s the truth.

Now Slithers,

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:53:46

“Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?”

I’ll tell you as soon as you let me know the secret to building houses at $50/sq ft including land.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:54:57

Tell us Slithers.

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:56:24

Dude, I told you…you tell me the secrets to building $50/sq ft homes including land and I’ll answer every question you have. But you have to go first…..

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:58:24

That’s already been done many times.

Answer the question Slithers;

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

 
Comment by polly
2013-06-10 07:06:13

Smithers,

I’m not sure if it is the arithmetic or reading comprehension that is the problem, but your response to Oxide was simply appalling. Try again.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:08:35

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LOLZ. Readers…. look at this ruse.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-06-10 07:35:49

The math of the indentured must by its nature be full of holes. Otherwise it would be unbearable.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 08:03:05

Smithers, I didn’t say that I “pay” $1000 for interest I and property taxes T. I don’t pay $1000. I actually pay I+T, which I don’t want to reveal. But that I + T is $1000 LESS THAN rent on a comparable property. So if I deducted that I + T from my taxes, then I would get cash back in my refund, and effectively save more than the $1000.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-06-10 08:36:15

Buying overpriced things you don’t need and can’t afford on credit never is quite the same as “saving”.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:39:15

Oxide:

OK I misunderstood.

Point is you save a **ALOT** of taxes by owning vs. renting.

By the way, you should never have a refund. It’s an interest free loan to the govt. Always owe money at the end of the year, that way you get a 0% loan from them. And starting next year, Obamacare will penalize your refund if you don’t comply. No refund = no penalty. They can’t make you pay the tax (that Obama swore wasn’t a tax) any other way.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:45:09

Answer the question Slithers;

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 09:19:38

I have health insurance, so Obamacare won’t penalize my refund. Based on house prices around here, I didn’t overpay. I can afford it at 3x income.

And, yes, it is the same as saving. I have to live somewhere, and unfortuneately I don’t have a passel of rugrats to mooch off of.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 09:23:11

You overpaid for certain. You’re just too stupid to realize it but you will eventually.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-06-10 10:20:58

“I can afford it at 3x income”

I thought you had to borrow it for like 30 years. We use “afford” in a different sense.

Let’s agree that we cannot exchange offspring insults, you’re unarmed. Besides, you concept of mooching is apparently as inside out as your concept of saving.

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 11:03:41

“Smithers,

I’m not sure if it is the arithmetic or reading comprehension that is the problem, but your response to Oxide was simply appalling. Try again.”

+1k

 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 11:32:06

Blue Skye, yes, I had to borrow for 30 years. But compared to renting, I still come out ahead. Even if I had to sell tomorrow I would at least break even compared to renting. I can afford to buy as much as could afford to rent. And I have to do one or the other, because of [offspring situation]. ( <—- hope that’s good. I didn’t like the offpsring wars either. :-) )

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 11:51:04

How do you “come out ahead” when per month rental rates for the same square footage are a fraction of your total carrying costs?

Your failure to acknowledge this demonstrates you’re not able or willing to be honest about what you paid and the mess you’ve got yourself in.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-10 17:34:58

HA - good point. And don’t forget, the entire premise hinges upon the value of the property never going down. Once that happens (and it will eventually if we don’t magically create new high paying jobs), he has to factor that loss into the total cost.

Remember - he’s paying principle too, unless of course it’s an interest only crapola mortgage in which case we don’t even need to bother with this discussion….

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 22:40:51

“Always owe money at the end of the year, that way you get a 0% loan from them.”

Now giving out free (though incorrect) tax advice?

How can we ever thank you enough for all of your contributions?

 
 
Comment by ethan in norfolk va
2013-06-10 08:18:42

It’s not that great here in Norfolk — mainly thanks to the Navy.

Renting at half the cost gets you half the place or less.

Looking at Northern Virginia. It’s expensive up there but there are better jobs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:48:49

Not true. Price per square foot, rental rates are a small fraction of buying.

Why get ripped off by buying?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-06-10 10:23:18

Renters tend to be more practical in how area they really need. Debt thinkers tend to go for all they can pull.

 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-10 07:05:26

Downwind, instead of upwind.

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 07:30:32

Realtors® love giving golden showers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-06-11 09:27:58

HA
Your beating up on us homeowners is
getting old. You evidently live as a freeloader.
Most us got sick of paying the LL’s mortgage,
did the math, and bought a home.
I am very happy for oxide.

The ROI for paying rent is zilch.
At least we have a place to call home.

Our Supp. Property Tax bill finally came in
after 9 months. 9 freak’in months. (So Ca)

Just put the exterior shutters up and the adirondack
chairs out front. It’s starting to look like home.
Thinking of buying porch swing to enjoy
a lemonade with the neighborhood kids in the summer
evenings. Life is great.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-06-11 22:55:34

The ROI for paying rent is zilch.

Funny—I feel as though I get the use of the house and yard in exchange for my rent payments. That’s something, and definitely not zilch.

 
 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2013-06-10 05:44:29

Cash, homes,jobs,real estate, stocks, bonds, insurance, precious metals, bitcoins. Add to the list. Theme is tangibles (semi-tangibles?) and in the event of inflation or black swan, what happens to them.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:15:43

If you take on mortgage debt at current massively inflated housing prices, you’ll enslave yourself for the rest of your life.

“Debt is bondage.”~ Suze Orman, May 11, 2013

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 07:38:26

Such thoughtful, deliberated, financial decision making here:

“offering $100,000 more than the asking price or placing offers on homes they have only spent minutes in”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/us/cash-is-fueling-quick-home-sales.html?pagewanted=all

 
Comment by goon squad
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:19:02

Housing Sales At Multi Decade Lows

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2013/03/20130328_house2.jpg

You do know what happens when prices rise on tiny volume…. right?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:20:09

“Housing’s Dead Cat Bounce”

Now that it’s self-evident that housing is in dead cat bounce mode, you can now observe the losses of those who were foolish enough to believe the tripe and paid a grossly inflated price for a house even though a house is always a depreciating asset.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:21:51

Does this fall under the HOPE or the CHANGE portion of the program?

“The number of individuals on SNAP hit a record high in December, with 47,792,056 people enrolled. SNAP has been in the news in recent years and months as the program’s rolls have ballooned and the cost has quadrupled since 2001 and doubled since President Obama took office.”

Good thing we didn’t elect that nutty Mormon.

Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 08:20:57

That would be the OUTSOURCING AND INSOURCING program that’s been going on for 30 years.

And the WALMART GIVE YOUR EMPLOYEES 34 INCONSISTENT HOURS program.

And the GORDON GEKKO HIT MY NUMBERS program.

Comment by goon squad
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 13:16:47
 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 20:45:22

I love oxide’s posts when they don’t pertain to her house, or shilling housing period.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:22:42

No it falls under the GOP are screwing everyone but the rich, program.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68R40I20100928

 
Comment by Dirk Diggler
2013-06-10 15:31:33

But Mr. Smithers, that is the whole objective of this clown in the White House. More dependency on the nanny govt. and more power to tell you
what you can or cannot do with Obamacare.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:25:04

“Housing Recovery Is a Sham Says the Guardian’s Heidi Moore”

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/housing-recovery-sham-says-guardian-heidi-moore-131443918.html?=vp1

A “housing recovery” is dramatically lower and more affordable housing prices by definition.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:26:12

“Best Explanation on the Fake Housing Market Recovery I’ve Seen”

http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/advisor/best-explanation-fake-housing-market-recovery-ve-seen-162530153.html

First the HBB, then Mark Hanson, then Ritholtz…… now it’s gone mainstream.

Comment by ethan in norfolk va
2013-06-10 08:24:20

Will all of this rental inventory push rents lower? Here in Norfolk there is a ton of new projects in the pipeline.

Some friends and myself rented a space as a community geek lab a few years ago. Since then the landlords are in prison for fraud, the bank collapsed and leaders are in prison, building bought at firesale and undergoing 24 million dollar reno to turn it into high priced studio apartments. The rental rate pencils out to over $24/sqft. In crappy Norfolk.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:42:54

Rental rates are falling and have been for 4 years.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:34:40

“The US Housing Recovery Is A Mirage And A Serious Delinquency Crisis Is Coming”

http://www.businessinsider.com/keith-jurow-us-housing-recovery-mirage-2013-4#ixzz2QpVCDDPz

Housing prices measured in price per square foot is cratering in the northeast.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:36:45

“The Second Housing Bubble Ends With A Bang, Not A Whimper, David Stockman Warns”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-04/second-housing-bubble-ends-bang-not-whimper-david-stockman-warns

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:39:29

Phoenix AZ Rental Rates Crashing

http://picpaste.com/pics/22c3a8022f353f7b65c4c937d5fa2af0.1368969951.png

The wave of “investors” who bought early in 2013 are losing money already. ALOT of money.

 
Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 06:50:38

Got facebook accounts?

Delete ‘em. Now.

See, this is something people could actually do, without much inconvenience to themselves, while sending a message. No protesting in crappy weather, no risk of arrest, etc. But will it happen? I doubt it. Snowden risked his neck for a mass of mouth-breathers.

Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 06:57:53

As long as the free government cheese gets delivered every month - the mouth breathers will do nothing.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 06:59:46

Deleted in April 2012 in advance of their cratering IPO.

People who can’t be bothered to individually phone, text, e-mail their “friends” are not really your friends.

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:16:16

Your phone calls, texts, and e-mails are all being recorded and stored by the US military.

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 12:51:27

missing. the. point.

and besides, I have a .mil work e-mail address, I am the military.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 14:26:19

That just makes it easier for them to spy on you, goon.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 17:59:45

Spy on what? My posts here? That I bought ammo online from some sketchy website linked off gunbot dot net?

Many of my .mil colleagues use their government computers to browse Drudge and all of his World Net Daily and Infowars links, and none of them have been asked about it.

Google is spying on me and I know it, but my life really isn’t all that interesting…

 
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-06-10 14:31:33

People who can’t be bothered to individually phone, text, e-mail their “friends” are not really your friends.

Brilliant synopsis.

 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 07:09:30

I admire the guy but agree, our country probably won’t stop violating civil liberties anytime soon. America is scarier than China right now. We have more capabilities and we use them in secret. At least China is pretty blunt about the fact it censors the ‘net and snoops on suspected dissidents.

It takes balls to do what this guy did. He had a BiLA job. Requires minimal skill but pays 200k/yr with good benefits. All you have to do is ignore your conscience and you end up on easy street. Actually, this somewhat describes my job too. I really don’t have that any nat’l security secrets, though. I just know about private contractors ripping off the gov’t and committing crimes in foreign countries while fulfilling DoD contracts.

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 07:21:25

feds drool, contractors RULE!

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 07:21:58

One of my favorite songs:

Christy Moore - No Time For Love

You call it the law, we call it apartheid, internment, conscription, partition and silence.
It’s the law that they make to keep you and me where they think we belong.
The hide behind steel and bullet-proof glass, machine guns and spies,
And tell us who suffer the tear gas and the torture that we’re in the wrong.

CHORUS

No time for love if they come in the morning,
No time to show tears or for fears in the morning,
No time for goodbye, no time to ask why,
And the sound of the siren’s the cry of the morning.

They suffered the torture they rotted in cells, went crazy, wrote letters and died.
The limits of pain they endured - the loneliness got them instead.
And the courts gave them justice as justice is given by well-mannered thugs.
Sometimes they fought for the will to survive but more times they just wished they were dead.

The boys in blue are only a few of the everyday cops on
The beat,
The C.I.D., Branchmen, informers and spies do their
Jobs just as well;
Behind them the men who tap phones, take photos,
Program computers and files,
And the man who tells them when to come and take you to
Your cell.

All of you people who give to your sisters and brothers the will to fight on,
They say you can get used to a war, that doesn’t mean that the war isn’t on.
The fish need the sea to survive, just like your people need you.
And the death squad can only get through to them if first they can get through to you.

 
Comment by jose canusi
2013-06-10 07:34:06

Great story: When the whole private contractor thing started getting cranked up during the Bush administration, a buddy of mine answered a blind ad on Craigslist (I kid you not) just on a lark. He was answered back right away, I think it was a pretty obscure outfit looking for their piece of the pie, but the recruiter was all excited and there was much back and forth, over the phone, via email, etc. All sorts of info about how much money was involved, etc. My buddy kept stringing him along until one day the guy mentioned something about how great it was that my buddy spoke Farsi. “Farsi???? sez buddy. Your ad never said anything about Farsi.”

Sure enough, the contractor had omitted that little requirement from the ad by mistake, and not realizing this, thought all the respondents spoke Farsi. That was the end of that.

Private contractors recruiting on Craigslist, and leaving out vital requirements in their ads. You can’t make this stuff up.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:38:17

Same experience.

‘04 a recruiter called me. The money was sweet for putting up a building in sand and a few miles of ductile iron pipe. $350k for 336 days work, untaxed.

Me: Can I pack iron.
Him: Silence
Me: Will I have armed escort in field
Him: Silence
Me: What is the max life insurance I can buy?
Him: $70k
Me: FU and good riddance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 07:43:26

He also lied to you about the income being untaxed.

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion

If you meet certain requirements, you may qualify for the foreign earned income and foreign housing exclusions and the foreign housing deduction.

If you are a U.S. citizen or a resident alien of the United States and you live abroad, you are taxed on your worldwide income. However, you may qualify to exclude from income up to an amount of your foreign earnings that is now adjusted for inflation ($91,400 for 2009, $91,500 for 2010, $92,900 for 2011, $95,100 for 2012). In addition, you can exclude or deduct certain foreign housing amounts.

http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Foreign-Earned-Income-Exclusion

 
 
 
 
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 07:48:28

Deleted FB account in 2006.

Thinking about deleting gmail account as well. The problem is I have been using gmail as my primary email since 2004. It will take some time but I will delete it.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 08:58:36

What alternative will you use to GMail?

AOL, Yahoo, Microsoft (Hotmail/Live/Outlook) all share info with the gov’t.

I’ve tried to use other providers before but the quality is much worse. I had a GMX account but it was really bad. And it doesn’t work very well on a smart phone.

Personally I think I am going to switch from Gmail to AOL just because I trust Google the least of all, they are _way_ too helpful to the government.

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 09:09:42

I have my own domain including email hosted on a small business server farm. I assume it’s too small potatoes to matter for now, but I wonder if the govt will lean on the small potatoes server farms eventually? I could just get a static IP from my ISP and run a server at home but it’s really nice to let someone else worry about the maintenance and upgrades and backups.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ahansen
2013-06-10 23:07:31

You could try a dial-up. For many years I maintained an account with a host ISP simply for the courtesy bypass of my address through their server. Alas, my new gov’t-subsidized (to them, not me) DSL didn’t bother to tell us rural rubes that they were about to be bought out by Google, so now I’m stuck with them.

Wildblue sucks, btw.

 
 
Comment by polly
2013-06-10 09:59:47

Doesn’t Princeton have alumni accounts hosted on their own servers? I’ve been using an alum account for years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 12:28:29

Excellent idea, I should start using alumni accounts. I just need to unsubscribe from the 2 dozen+ email list groups I’m on. Right now I’ve just been forwarding those addresses to gmail with everything else.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 14:26:33

My mom-n-pop ISP has its own email.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 14:28:56

FRII? Always liked them…

 
 
 
Comment by Bluto
2013-06-10 12:13:34

Some smaller ISP’s claim they protect customer data and mine (sonic.net) gets top marks from the EFF… (I have no connection to Sonic other than being a happy customer)
Anyway some 2013 privacy policy ratings (plus additional info)for some well known internet companies are at
https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2013
well worth a look…

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-06-10 10:18:10

The reality is that people are interested on the practical impact on their lives. Does the average person think the Patriot Act has impacted his/her life? Probably not. Does the average person think this revelation impacts his/her life? Probably not.

That’s the bottom line.

As long as the average person has a mission (work)* and through it can provide in a satisfactory manner for themselves and their family, the rest is entertainment.

* I really do think people need some sort of mission in their lives or they start to break down. Even if that mission is “make money to live.”

 
Comment by United States of Moral Hazard
2013-06-10 12:57:04

Never had a Facebook account, never will.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 06:51:47

“Global emissions of carbon dioxide from energy use rose 1.4 percent to 31.6 gigatons in 2012, setting a record and putting the planet on course for temperature increases well above international climate goals, the International Energy Agency said in a report scheduled to be issued Monday.

The agency said continuing that pace could mean a temperature increase over pre-industrial times of as much as 5.3 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit ), which IEA chief economist Fatih Birol warned “would be a disaster for all countries.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/carbon-dioxide-emissions-rose-14-percent-in-2012-iea-report-says/2013/06/09/35d32bac-d123-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_story.html

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 07:03:19

And before the political trolls pile on, the problem is too many humanoids, not whether they elect Coke or Pepsi to govern them. See Ben Jones’ post in yesterday’s bits bucket on that topic.

Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 07:48:44

But obama promised to heal the planet and lower the oceans.

Did he lie again?

But remember - all political parties are the same when democrats are in power. So why change. There is nothing we can do anyways. We might as well keep the devil we know.

When republicans are in power - they are the most vile and evil people on the planet and they must be voted out of office. All evil in the world can be traced to them and only if we elect democrats will these problems be solved. Plus we will save starving children.

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 08:33:06

Hey bananapanties, we voted for Gary Johnson (after donating money to Ron Paul and voting for him in the caucus), and in the past have voted for Tom Tancredo, Dennis Kucinich, and Ralph Nader. If you want to remain a slave on the two-party plantation, that’s your decision. And you’ll get the government you deserve.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:53:27

“we voted for Gary Johnson ”

A vote for a 3rd party kook = a NOT a vote for Obama’s opponent. Which means your vote was effectively a vote for Obama. You had a chance to remove Obama from office. You didn’t take that chance. You are as guilty as anyone who voted for him.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:55:22

Slithers,

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions??

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-06-10 10:28:24

“vote for a 3rd party kook = a NOT…”

Victim logic has a lot in common with Debt Donkey logic.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:56:22

“But remember - all political parties are the same when democrats are in power. So why change. There is nothing we can do anyways. We might as well keep the devil we know.

When republicans are in power - they are the most vile and evil people on the planet and they must be voted out of office. All evil in the world can be traced to them and only if we elect democrats will these problems be solved. Plus we will save starving children.”

Everything that happened starting as 12:01pm on Jan 20, 2001 was Bush’s fault. The .com collapse? Bush’s fault. 9/11 (which took 5 years to plan), Bush’s fault.

Yet here we are 4.5 years into Obama’s reign and everything is still Bush’s fault.

But all political parties suck. We just never seem to blame the party that starts with a “D” for anything.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:18:21

Both parties suck even when they’re _not_ in power. Did you see how the GOP treated Ron Paul in 2012? Borderline fascism. This was a guy with alot [sic] of delegates. They wouldn’t let him speak at their convention and basically changed the rules of the convention to marginalize his delegates.

Neither party deserves anyone’s support, the GOP least of all.

 
Comment by goon squad
 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:27:54

That pretty much it, joe.

But politics has been about the lesser of two evils.

The Dems suck, but they suck a lot less than the GOP.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-06-11 09:31:36

joe & eco
I came to that conclusion as well.
Stay home, why vote.
We do have the Declaration
Of Independence, but have yet to take
it seriously. Our founding fathers were brilliant optimists.

 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:03:14

Gary Johnson was the right choice. Mittens is a repulsive human being, unworthy of anyone’s support. I can’t believe the GOP is so “stuck on stupid” that their final primary choices were Mittens, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Herman Cain. Like, seriously, you have a chance to unseat Obama (it was doable) and that’s what you come up with?

I stand by saying that the GOP would never nominate someone like Chris Christie or John Huntsman. They aren’t the “take care of American first” party, they aren’t the “law and order” party, and they surely aren’t the efficient management party. The Eisenhower days are long gone.

BTW, the Dems obviously have problems too. But until the GOP fixes its “stupid” problem, they’re only be relevant in Flyover country and NASCAR country. Yee haw.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Dirk Diggler
2013-06-10 15:45:51

THE ONLY THING STUPID ARE THE BRAIN DEAD MORONS THAT
VOTED FOR BAMMY.

 
 
Comment by Dirk Diggler
2013-06-10 15:37:52

+1000. Keep rattling their cage banana!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 06:55:15

OLD: Selling secrets to China = treason

NEW: Selling secrets to China = hero of the people

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 06:59:30

Slithers,

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:41:46

I will tell you as soon as you reveal the secret of building houses for $50/ sq ft including land for a profit. Come on man, I’m dying to know this.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:43:56

It’s already been explained time and time again. You just don’t like it.

Slippery Slithers,

Why do you champion price fixing of housing and market distortions?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:21:13

Slithers:

Can you please enlighten us as to WHY you are bringing up the topic of selling secrets to China? I haven’t seen anything like that in the news lately.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:29:44

Corporations sending jobs and secrets to China = just business

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 07:01:04

“Yeah, Obamacare sucks and will never work, but something had to be done.”

Just keep making government bigger and bigger - they will solve all problems eventually.

——————————

Ohio Dept. of Insurance: Obamacare To Increase Individual-Market Health Premiums By 88 Percent
Forbes | 6/10/2013 | Avik Roy

Democrats continue to try to dismiss the evidence that Obamacare will dramatically increase the cost of insurance for people who buy it on their own. But on Thursday, the Ohio Department of Insurance announced that, based on the rates submitted by insurers to date, the average individual-market health insurance premium in 2014 will come in around $420, “representing an increase of 88 percent” relative to 2013.

“We have warned of these increases,” said Lt. Gov. Mary Taylor in a statement. “Consumers will have fewer choices and pay much higher premiums for their health insurance starting in 2014.”

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:46:32

Only 88%? Compared to CA where the increase is 150%, that’s a bargain.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:02:42

Why are there so many govt lawyers and paid hacks posting on the HBB?

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:21:03

polly is the only gov’t lawyer on here.

I do qualify as a paid hack, though.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 07:10:06

Another classic.

The most transparent administration in human history sure likes to plead the fifth..

————————

Obama: No warrantless wiretaps if you elect me (2008)
CNET | 1-08-2008 | Anne Broache

“My job this morning is to be so persuasive…that a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Barack,” he told a crowd of about 300 Ivy Leaguers–and, by the looks of it, a handful of locals who managed to gain access to what was supposed to be a students-only event.

For one thing, under an Obama presidency, Americans will be able to leave behind the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and “wiretaps without warrants,” he said.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:57:57

“For one thing, under an Obama presidency, Americans will be able to leave behind the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and “wiretaps without warrants,” he said.”

Didn’t he also promised no new taxes for anyone under $250K?

List of all new taxes Obama has introduced for those under $250K

http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-taxes.php

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:12:40

“CS Realtor Indicted for Allegedly Scamming Hearne Couple”

http://www.kbtx.com/news/local/headlines/39236052.html

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 07:14:17
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-10 07:28:53

But…the bigger government gets, the more it can help people…

—————-

The Totalitarianism at the Heart of the Obama Scandals
FrontPageMag.com | June 10, 2013 | Mark Tapson

The Obama administration’s legs are wobbling under the weight of so many scandals lately that whole chunks of the edifice – the IRS, the NSA, the DOJ – are threatening to implode, particularly without support from the normally adoring media. Even the New York Times – the New York Times! – is no longer willing to bolster an administration whose totalitarian urges have been exposed to the light.

Let’s begin with the Internal Revenue Service’s thuggish targeting of conservative groups. From April 2010 to April 2012, the IRS placed on hold the processing of applications for tax-exempt status received from organizations with such presumably conservative indicators as “Tea Party,” “patriots,” or “9/12” in their names, approving only four while green-lighting applications from several dozen organizations whose names included the likely left-leaning terms “progressive,” “progress,” “liberal,” or “equality.” It demanded from some conservative organizations unwieldy amounts of documentation and private information, such as what books their members were reading or what they had posted on social networking sites. The Coalition for Life of Iowa was actually asked to detail the content of their prayers at meetings. The Cincinnati office of the IRS leaked confidential donor information from some conservative applications to an investigative reporting organization. Even some conservative individuals are now alleging that they were personally targeted by the IRS for political reasons. Mark Steyn correctly labeled this abuse “a scale of depravity hitherto unknown to the tax authorities of the United States.”
So much for the administration that promised transparency.

But such behavior is entirely consistent with the power-hungry nature of Obama and his cronies. Remember, this is a cabal of Alinskyites who possess an open resentment of and frustration with the Constitution, the “flawed,” “living document” that throws up roadblocks to their totalitarian agenda.

What lies at the heart of these scandals – actually, “scandal,” implying merely naughty behavior, doesn’t adequately describe what these transgressions are: criminal and politically abusive activities – is that they confirm the totalitarian mindset of this supposedly “liberal” administration and reflect the validity of our motto at FrontPage Magazine: “Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out.” The Obama White House is brimming with political bullies who secretly and illegally surveil and target opponents among the media and “average” American citizens. That is the totalitarian way.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 07:52:02

The gov’t isn’t getting bigger. The fed gov’t is smaller now than any time in recent history. What is bigger are private contractors. They are much, much bigger.

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 08:40:14

That was the argument made by Bush republicans.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-10 08:40:24

And while the Feds are getting 11 sequester furlough days, the contractors will continue working (and getting PAID). Because Feds drool, and contractors rule.

“Even if I fell, I land on a bunch of money” — Jay Z

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 08:46:07

And they are the one’s reading your email and snooping on your phone calls.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-10 08:50:20

Still blaming Boooooooosh.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 09:11:41

Boooooooosh should be blamed to eternity.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Brett
2013-06-10 08:35:43

My friend who is a Realtor and landlord just updated his Facebook status with the following message:

—————-

“I do so enjoy that tenants feel as though you as the landlord somehow work for them. That they can demand whatever they want and you’re supposed to immediately provide. Good thing this is a super hot market, because I shall have no problems finding new tenants upon expiration of the current lease. :-)”

—————–

I would NEVER want to have a landlord with this attitude…

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:47:15

Considering rental rates are half the cost of buying at current inflated asking prices of resale housing, a “landlord’s atittude” doesn’t make much of a difference.

Comment by Brett
2013-06-10 08:50:33

I hope that statement is true in the middle of nowhere USA… Not always true across the board

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 08:52:43

No need to hope and pine. EVERYWHERE

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 17:23:23

Probably not true, Brett. Where the rent is cheap, there is probably cheap housing to match. However, in some places in flyover, houses are cheap enough that it would be folly NOT to buy. For example, Carl in his trailer park. Buying a trailer outright probably paid for itself in saved rent in a couple years. In 5 years it would pay for itself even if renting really were half the cost of buying.

A trailer park in Florida has been the senior citizen’s Oil City plan for decades.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 19:57:43

EVERYWHERE

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-11 08:53:15

Oxide, your example using me confuses me. I paid cash for a trailer and pay a pittance for lot fees each month specifically because the houses here are outrageously expensive relative to incomes. So I found a way to avoid giving all my spare income to the banks each month, but it required me to compromise on my “needs”, particularly in the image and extra space/garage area. There was no other way to accomplish that while living and working in this location.

Bottom line, the only way to avoid giving your money to the banks around here is to live like a poor person. Everything else has been gamed.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-06-10 08:55:11

Spoke to a guy yesterday who owns a few rental houses. He purposefully doesn’t raise the rents on his tenants as high as he can…and tells them about it.

“I could charge you a lot more, but I don’t because you’re a good tenant, treat the property well, and deal with small issues on your own, etc.”

His tenants are grateful, treat the properties well, and don’t call him for minor issues…his life is made much easier…wise man.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:08:52

On the Mr Landlord.com forms, I post as “Bmore Landlord” or “Bmore LL” and am constantly telling other LL’s to stop nickle and diming good tenants.

People on there post the most idiotic things like “how much should I charge my good tenants if they want to add a 2nd cat”… after they’ve already taken a $200 deposit for the first cat (in addition to regular sec dep) and they’ve seen that the tenants take good care of the cat and the unit.

I actually _lower_ the rates for good tenants. Not alot [sic] (bc I believe in doing proactive maintenance) but $50/month is enough for them to fill up their gas tank or pay some other bills. Also they already realize I could get more for the unit and prefer to have good people and not become anything approaching a full time LL.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:23:30

Here’s my response to some d-bag trying to get more $ out of tenants for adding a 2nd cat:
—————————————
http://www.mrlandlord.com/landlordforum/display.php?id=14078248

“Tenant to add 2nd cat? (by Bmore LL [MD]) Posted on: Jun 7, 2013 12:59 PM
Message: A lot of this depends on this question: How good are they as tenants? If they are good, stable tenants and they pay on time, I probably wouldn’t worry about the 2nd cat since they’re already responsible for carpet cleaning and since the first cat is working out. I would, if I were you, point out that it needs to be in writing with an amendment, and you could charge them some amt of money for their time. As a fee. As part of that agreement I would include that 2 is the absolute limit under that agreement.

It may turn out to be hard for them to get a mortgage. Or they may be unsure about buying a house for whatever reason. I wouldn’t just assume they’re going to be 1 yr tenants. I’ve seen people talk about saving for buying a house. All my tenants say that. Well, virtually all. Most of them don’t have the discipline to save up and/or can’t get approved for a mortgage now that more documentation and higher credit scores are needed.

If you treat good tenants well, you keep them longer and reduce their urgency to buy. If you hit them up for the 2nd cat, in my experience it’s likely that they will make sure to leave at the end of a yr, whether they buy or not. –38.127.xxx.xx

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Brett
2013-06-10 09:14:43

Scare tactics…

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-06-10 14:55:17

Recognition of the value of a painless tenant.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:13:01

This was a topic on the Mr Landlord cruise this past new yrs. Some LL’s get a hard on to show they have “control”. But the smarter ones realize that the “control” comes with a cost.

I personally would never want to use a realtor as a middleman. They tend to come off as douches and I wouldn’t trust one to be a go-between, distorting what I say. Postlets.com is great for avoiding realtors…

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 09:47:44

I have a property manager with this attitude. During their quarterly inspections they photograph every room. Last time, the PM flunkie, who apparently couldn’t get a job at the TSA or IRS, commented “Well, you look like you’re taking care of the house, but you’d better get on that (a few weeds in the xeriscaped front lawn.”)

I told him I understand that the owner is his customer, not me, but who kisses my ass for the $1,400 a month I pay for this underwater stucco crap shack?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 09:53:27

Be thankful you’re not the one carrying the losses on that rapidly depreciating asset.

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 10:10:45

Be thankful you’re not the one carrying the losses on that rapidly depreciating asset.

I suppose so.

But with what is happening here, the owner (if he’s smart) will probably sell it out from under us and we’ll have to move again. It’s the worst possible time in Las Vegas to buy, and the worst time for me to have cracked. Four moves in seven years - I’ve had it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 10:50:06

“It’s the worst possible time in Las Vegas to buy”

Then don’t buy. Why would you?

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 11:04:46

Then don’t buy. Why would you?

I’m not. Even if I was foolish enough to get involved with the mess the LV market is now, there is no selection because of the low inventory/multiple bids over asking.

Guess I roll the dice on another landlord (so far with three rentals - two crazy, one sane.)

Our oven’s electric, or else I’d be sticking my head in it.

 
 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 09:58:56

Photos of an undamaged house? For what reason? That’s seriously creeply.

Photos before you moved in? Sure, if you must. The message it sends to take photos of the house (without damages!) while inhabited outweighs any possible benefit.

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 10:20:35

Photos of an undamaged house? For what reason? That’s seriously creeply.

The PM kid hates me. Every time he shows up I tell him I gave the prostitutes and sweatshop workers the day off, and packed up the weed/meth operation - all in honor of his arrival. My husband says I’m a bitch.

It’s ludicrous. Our family members are my 81 yo mother who I’m caring for after a stroke, 64 yo husband, me 59, and a 21 yo daughter. We’re real desperados.

I read lately they’re charging the owner for the inspections ($55 each.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 11:11:00

$55 per inspection? WTF? At least you are only paying it indirectly.

If I were you, I’d make sure no one was home when these inspectors come. Do they just drop in or do they make appointments? Even if it’s an appointment, I’d have “something came up at work” as an excuse and go take a walk in the park that evening. I see no way they can charge you a convenience fee. I also don’t think they can enter without you there because it’s not an emergency (check your state laws on that one).

 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 11:23:05

a co-worker owns SFH rentals in henderson NV, says he can’t rasie the rent because too many rentals are availible now.

Same with phoenix I read. Too many landlords

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 11:25:31

$55 per inspection?

They very determinedly make appointments. You can protest, delay, tell them your mother is deathly ill (which she was) - makes no difference. The one concession I got from them was not to take a picture of her bedroom and of her in it.

Our lease states that inspections are three times a year. PM boy told me they’re quarterly. I responded no, they’re three times a year, per the lease. He said they’ve changed it (ha!) and I’d have to argue about it with the office.

I emailed the owner. The owner forwarded the email to the PM. The PM emailed me and commanded me not to contact the owner again. Comedy ensued (too long to bore you all with.)

 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 12:21:52

I just would act like the PM doesn’t exist. He can’t enter the premises without you being there or your permission. I would not return calls, blow him off for a while. Eventually you can let him in, but there’s no emergency, I see no reason to structure things in his favor.

This LL is also an epic buffoon for paying someone who has such spectacularly bad customer service skills.

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 12:58:17

I just would act like the PM doesn’t exist. He can’t enter the premises without you being there or your permission.

The place is old and naturally, things break down, so I have to call them (rare.) They never fix it right the first time. Usually, they don’t hear boo from us because if it’s small, I fix it myself rather than deal with them.

When I do call for a repair, it creeps me out that they always ask if they can enter without us being there.

This LL is also an epic buffoon for paying someone who has such spectacularly bad customer service skills.

He seems to be decent (accidental LL). Very wary of us, though, and comes off a bit superior.

After I let the PM know that I would not be told who I can talk to and that I was no longer feeling comfortable in the rental (month to month), the LL called me immediately to smooth things over. He was a little panicky. Got a semi-conciliatory note from the jerk at the PM, too.

I’m looking, even though I hate the thought of moving again. I hear the rents are really coming down.

 
Comment by snowgirl
2013-06-10 13:10:25

Weird….I took photos when we signed papers on our rental because they promised work would be done before we moved in and the realtor was adamant I not take any photos w/him in it.

Creeped me out.

Btw, that work promised in writing on the contract was never done.

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 13:16:56

And you just know that they’re going to try and screw you out of your deposit even if you leave the place spotless.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:41:15

Tell the PM to eff off.

Unless it says so in the contract, you did not give rights to a third party to enter your home for anything other than repairs.

Check your local renters laws.

I sincerely hope you told him to kiss your ass when he said not to contact the landlord. Loudly. I would have cussed the SOB upside one wall and down the other and threaten legal actions as well, and then proceeded with at least a formal legal complaint.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-06-10 10:33:41

I would never want to have a friend with that attitude.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 12:23:29

I had a landlord like that one time. I accidentally broke the window when I moved out at lease expiration, quite willingly.

 
Comment by wittbelle
2013-06-10 23:03:44

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 09:20:13

June 10, 2013, 6:30 a.m. EDT
In some places, homes sell in just one day
Tight inventory in hot markets means buyers act in a flash
By Amy Hoak, MarketWatch

Here’s a sign of how tight inventory levels have been lately: More homes are selling in a flash—finding a buyer within 24 hours of being listed.

Sound unlikely?

Angela Catanzaro thought so, too, until her Broward County, Fla., home received a written offer one day after their listing hit the Internet. The home she and her husband decided to buy was also on the market for less than a day; they pounced on it after struggling to find quality properties that didn’t “need work.”

They plan to close on both transactions this month.

“We weren’t anticipating our home to sell so fast, so we asked if it was OK to stay until June so our daughter could finish school,” Catanzaro said. The Catanzaros didn’t even use a real-estate agent to market their house. They simply posted it on Zillow, a real-estate website.

Glenn Kelman, chief executive of Seattle-based real-estate brokerage Redfin, calls quick transactions like these “flash sales,” and said there have been more of them since the beginning of the year. That’s due to low inventory in the most competitive markets, including Miami, Washington, D.C., San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Comment by oxide
2013-06-10 10:06:52

after struggling to find quality properties that didn’t “need work.”

Key phrase, folks. I think we’re going to see more and more of this. Foreclosures are a lower price for a reason.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 11:01:26

I can’t wait to hear your lame excuse for construction costs that are lower than foreclosure prices.

Waiting anxiously.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-10 10:42:31

Here in Tucson, inventory is starting to creep up. A lot of the houses were on the market before.

Methinks that the owners are giving those 2005-09 wishing prices another try. Good luck with that.

Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 11:14:15

Did that flip you posted the last few weeks end up being a rental? I remember you were going to do a ride-by last weekend.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-10 13:13:03

It’s still up for sale. I didn’t see any sign of an open house yesterday afternoon. Or on Saturday.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-10 12:03:54

Bubble 2.0 is very regional this time around.

 
Comment by snowgirl
2013-06-10 13:16:07

A lot of what is on the market now has been on before. Some have gone off one, two, three times. Some have been on since 2007.

 
 
 
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 09:30:27

via zerohedge

Submitted by Pater Tenebrarum of Acting-Man blog,

You want to invest $100,000 in agency paper but find the yield to be too low. How can you increase your yield without assuming additional risk? Easy, here is how. You do not have to send me $19.99 for the tapes (plus shipping and handling) or spend $5,000 for my weekend seminar. This is a freebie.

First, go buy a house with your $100,000. Then sell the house to someone who has no money and only a marginal credit history, taking a loan of $120,000 in return. In real estate terms, this is called a 120% LTV loan (loan-to-value).

Instead of receiving interest on your $100,000 capital, your interest is now based on the $120,000 loan amount. For example, if agency paper is yielding 3%, your $100,000 would normally pay you $3000 interest. With this perfect investment scheme, you would in addition receive the 3% of $20,000, increasing your yield to 3.6%. Furthermore, if the house appreciates in value, you will receive the first $20,000 in addition to getting your $100,000 principal back. There is no risk because your rich Uncle Sam said he will guarantee the loan.

There is an even better way to monetize the loan. Brother Ben, who is as rich as Uncle Sam, said he will buy $45 billion of these notes at face value every month. Just sell the note to Brother Ben and pocket a $20,000 profit, all with no risk.

Honestly, this is more a scam than an investment strategy. The victim is the sucker who is paying interest on a 120% LTV loan on a house that may never be his unless the value appreciates by at least 20%.

In real life, this scheme is known as HARP. It is the Government that is victimizing borrowers by offering them this terrible deal, somehow convincing them that it is in their best interest to become a mortgage slave.

In closing, this short outburst is a byproduct of my other recent rants. I simply do not see how we can have a genuinely recovering real estate market before these wild schemes are removed.

Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:44:22

No Banker left behind!

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-10 15:33:16

Ry Cooder recorded a very good song by that name.

 
 
 
Comment by joe sees your PPQ and counters that it's immaterial to your unpopulated joint venture
2013-06-10 10:14:05

Booz Allen Hamilton… an instrumentality of the “invisible hand of the free market” and “private sector bootstrapping”.

http://www.infowars.com/leakers-employer-became-wealthy-by-maintaining-government-secrets/

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-10 11:07:19

This morning, NPR reported that their stock price was down sharply.

 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 11:29:50

Full Time Employees: 24,500

 
 
Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-10 10:47:54

Daughter moved to a nicer apartment about 6 months ago. Said last night that she is about ready to move back to the ghetto.

Why? Because the meth cookers and weed growers/sellers weren’t a-holes like her current neighbors. Said the druggies were polite and pretty much kept a low profile, unlike the current frat-boy residents of her building.

Their latest idea of fun is to knock on doors/ring doorbells at random times during the night. (Next up……burning bags of dog crap?)

Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:46:25

“Frat boys” is a pretty damn good description.

Young dumbA’s with too much money is even better.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 11:14:15

Federal Reserve policy has been credited often with pushing up stock prices, but one research firm believes the central bank has pushed all asset prices to extreme levels.

“We think investors with a longer-term outlook should tread carefully in financial markets,” TrimTabs said in its widely followed weekly market analysis. “The Federal Reserve and its fellow central banks have succeeded in making almost every major asset class in the world overpriced.”

While the S&P 500 (^GSPC) has climbed more than 15 percent year-to-date, other risk assets have surged as well, while the Fed has expanded its balance sheet past $3.4 trillion in efforts to spur growth.

TrimTabs cites a few: Global junk bond issuance (a record $254 billion through May); house flipping in California, which a recent Wall Street Journal report pegged at its fastest pace since 2005; and the increased creation of collateralized debt obligations , the instruments that helped create the financial crisis. They are around pre-crisis levels.

“It is amazing how quickly bubble behaviors from the last decade have come back,” TrimTabs CEO David Satschi noted.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 13:25:03

“The Federal Reserve and its fellow central banks have succeeded in making almost every major asset class in the world overpriced.”

Compared to what?

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-10 14:02:48

Compared to what?

Incomes.

 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 14:04:22

Compared to what?”

yes thats the right question. wages maybe ? I don’t see any other meaningful comparison that will work long term.

could be global wages though

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 14:58:26

“wages maybe ?”

Bailout cash stashes?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-06-10 13:00:22

I love honest people.

5:00 to 6:10 of this video this poor woman looses track of the talking points that were written for her as she is reading them live on MSNBC and then turns to the left and tells her handler “I messed up”.

Sandy Hook Mom Describes Seeing Police Officer … - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZvo-W1u47o - 217k -

Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-10 13:49:00

WTH is this all about?

Comment by non-conformist
2013-06-10 14:22:52

“WTH is this all about?”

I believe this guy was right.

James Tracy, Controversial FAU Professor, Says Boston Bombing Is …

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/james-tracy-professor-boston-bombing-conspiracy_n_3143643.html - 175k -

James Tracy, FAU Professor, Disputes Newtown Sandy Hook Massacre Account

Sun Sentinel | By Mike Clary
Posted: 01/08/2013 3:42 am EST

A communication professor known for conspiracy theories has stirred controversary at Florida Atlantic University with claims that last month’s Newtown, Conn., school shootings did not happen as reported — or may not have happened at all.

Moreover, James Tracy asserts in radio interviews and on his memoryholeblog.com that trained “crisis actors” may have been employed by the Obama administration in an effort to shape public opinion in favor of the event’s true purpose: gun control.

“As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers, there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends,” writes Tracy, a tenured associate professor of media history at FAU and a former union leader.

In another post, he says, “While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place — at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/fau-professor-newtown-massacre-james-tracy_n_2428898.html - 172k -

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2013-06-10 13:42:41

As home prices rise, demand for jumbo mortgages is rising too. And as investors look for new ways to cash in on the housing recovery, these mortgages are starting to look more attractive.

Since the housing crash began, the market for jumbo mortgage-backed securities, pools of these loans sold to investors, has been close to nothing. Banks still make the loans, but hold them on their books. Now that is beginning to change.

While the number of jumbo loans originated in the first quarter of this year was up 15 percent from a year ago, the number of those loans securitized and sold by lenders was up 400 percent, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. Four billion worth of jumbo loans were sold to investors, more than the $3.5 billion in jumbos originated in all of 2012.

Both Chase (JPM) Mortgage and Everbank began issuing non-agency mortgage-backed securities at the beginning of this year. Before that, Redwood Trust (RWT) and Credit Suisse were the only players in the market, and small players at that. Chase has made a big push in the space, rising to the number two spot in jumbo loan originations from number four in the market, and in turn opening the door for investors.

 
Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-10 13:55:02

Give a Middle finger to voyeurs in DC and Silli Valley!

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-10 14:28:08

Hey guys, we’re all flipping you the bird right now :)

 
Comment by Resistor
2013-06-10 16:03:41

Why? They’re here to protect us! Thank you NSA, I feel safer now!

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 20:53:22

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 21:38:14

Sorry for the mispost. It either didn’t work or was censored (picture a bobbing middle finger emoticon…).

 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2013-06-10 15:29:06

Northeastern NM’s dismal housing market:

From ABQ Journal today:

Northeastern New Mexico has been described as a “housing desert” where homes typically sell at a snail’s pace or sometimes not at all and new construction is rare to nonexistent.

The irony is that there are plenty of houses in the six counties that form the northeast quadrant of the state – Colfax, Harding, Mora, Quay, San Miguel and Union – but most are trashed out dumps, overpriced or both not ready or available for purchase by local residents.

An initiative is under way to organize a Northeast New Mexico Housing Task Force to explore the housing issues by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development and the New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority.

The first task force meeting is scheduled today at 11 a.m. at the Mosquero School District multipurpose building in the village of Mosquero in Harding County.

“There’s a recipe for how you put this all together and that’s where we have to get started,” said USDA Rural Development State Director Terry Brunner. “You need adequate employment opportunities, a stable water supply — to hell with this place, I quit & I’m moving away good local government leadership. You need public and private financing. You need a good group of existing or new homeowners. You need a housing agency to coordinate everything.”

Colfax, Harding, Mora, Quay, San Miguel and Union counties make up 16 percent of New Mexico’s total land area, 3 percent of the state’s population and an almost infinitesimally small portion of the state’s new construction.

Second homes and investment properties help to pump up the number of housing units relative to the number of households in a rural area.

In Colfax County, for example, there were 10,121 housing units compared to only 5,781 households, according to census data. The result is a housing overhang or excess capacity of 75 percent, hardly indicative of a housing shortage.

Comparable housing overhangs can be found in Mora County at 82 percent and Harding at 71 percent.

Quay County had one of the lower housing overhangs among the six counties at 51 percent, 5,567 housing units against 3,686 households. The lowest overhangs were in Union County at 38 percent and San Miguel at 31 percent.

For comparison, the housing overhang in urban Bernalillo County was only 9 percent, while the statewide average was 19 percent.

During the first quarter, a total of 47 homes were sold in all six counties. Asking prices for homes in the northeast quadrant vary greatly, from lows of less than $40,000 to highs approaching $1 million.

USDA Rural Development’s Ernie Watson said, “There is a major problem with absentee owners who live somewhere else and have let their houses fall in total disrepair. The value is not much and nobody would really want to live in them.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-10 15:35:56

This is one of the most rural parts of the U.S. Not much in the way of population, unless you count the herds of cattle.

 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-06-10 16:05:50

I would like to leave FL a year from now. Here are my top choices:

Georgia (ATL or North)
NW Arkansas
Delaware (anywhere, but maybe look into Wilmo first)

Now taking comments…

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-10 17:41:06

1) Wouldn’t a new job offer determine a new area? Can you just move wherever you want?

2) Why in the world would Atlanta be a top choice?

Comment by Resistor
2013-06-10 19:09:24

1. New job offer would determine, but since we’re K-12 Ed., we can look pretty much anywhere (except Upstate NY)

2. Family

 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-06-10 19:10:38

BTW, IIRC you live in Louisville area… KY is another option as well.

How does the pubic view public ed. there? Do you guys bash teachers and have a bunch of charters?

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-11 06:09:35

I’m in Lexington. It, Louisville, or the northern Ky area around Cincinnati (Covington, Ft Mitchell) might all warrant a look. They’re all reasonably pro-public ed.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-10 20:00:50

DE, hands down.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 22:35:43

Go the Poway.

P.S. We know the board president, so just in case there is any interest, give us a holler…

 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-06-10 17:25:18

Assuming at face value everything about Snowden is real, the internet poses some interesting challenges for controlling the masses.

Of course, they probably also have an “off” button for all of it.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 20:49:18

… “I’m cold,” Snowden moaned. “I’m cold.”

“You’re going to be all right, kid,” Yossarian assured him, patting his arm comfortingly. “Everything’s under control.”

Snowden shook his head feebly. “I’m cold,” he repeated, with eyes as dull and blind as stone. “I’m cold.”

“There, there,” Yossarian, with growing doubt and trepidation. “There, there. In a little while we’ll be back on the ground and Doc Daneeka will take care of you.”

But Snowden kept shaking his head and pointed at last, with just the barest movement of his chin, down to his armpit. Yossarian bent forward to peer and saw a strangely colored stain seeping through the coverall just above the armhole of Snowden’s flak suit. Yossarian felt his heart stop, then pound so violently he found it difficult to breathe. Snowden was wounded inside his flak suit. Yossarian ripped open the snaps of Snowden’s flak suit and heard himself scream wildly as Snowden’s insides slithered down to the floor in a soggy pile and just kept dripping out. A chunk of flak more than three inches big had shot into his other side just underneath the arm and blasted all the way through, drawing whole mottled quarts of Snowden along with it through the gigantic hole in his ribs it made as it blasted out. Yossarian screamed a second time and squeezed both hands over his eyes. His teeth were chattering in horror. He forced himself to look again. Here was God’s plenty, all right, he thought bitterly as he stared — liver, lungs, kidneys, ribs, stomach and bits of the stewed tomatoes Snowden had eaten that day for lunch. Yossarian hated stewed tomatoes and turned away dizzily and began to vomit, clutching his burning throat. The tail gunner woke up while Yossarian was vomiting, saw him, and fainted again.

Yossarian was limp with exhaustion, pain and despair when he finished. He turned back weakly to Snowden, whose breath had grown softer and more rapid, and whose face had grown paler. He wondered how in the world to begin to save him.

“I’m cold.” Snowden whimpered, “I’m cold.”

“There, there. Yossarian mumbled mechanically in a voice too low to be heard. “There, there.”

Yossarian was cold, too, and shivering uncontrollable. He felt goose pimples clacking all over him as he gazed down despondently at the grim secret Snowden had spilled all over the messy floor. It was easy to read the message in his entrails. Man was matter, that was Snowden’s secret. Drop him out a window and he’ll fall. Set fire to him and he’ll burn. Bury him and he’ll rot, like other kinds of garbage. The spirit gone, man is garbage. That was Snowden’s secret. Ripeness was all.

“I’m cold,” Snowden said. “I’m cold.”

“There, there,” said Yossarian. “There, there,” He pulled the rip cord of Snowden’s parachute and covered his body with the white nylon sheets.

“I’m cold.”

“There, there.”

– Joseph Heller, Catch-22, 1961
Death of Snowden

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2013-06-10 21:22:32

“I see everything twice!”

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 22:06:43

Peak oil is on hold forever? (Luckily oil prices are staying up plenty high despite rising shadow inventory…God’s work, ya know…)

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 22:09:34

The fracking eh…

ft dot com
June 10, 2013 7:53 pm
World has 10 years of shale oil, reports US
By Gregory Meyer in New York
Cuadrilla Shale Fracking Plant©Getty

Global shale resources are vast enough to cover more than a decade of oil consumption, according to the first-ever US assessment of reserves from Russia to Argentina.

The US Department of Energy estimated “technically recoverable” shale oil resources of 345bn barrels in 42 countries it surveyed, or 10 per cent of global crude supplies. The department had previously only provided an estimate for US shale reserves, which it on Monday increased from 32bn barrels to 58bn.

The pace of oil and gas production gains has consistently surprised forecasters since horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, better known as “fracking”, were pioneered in US shale rock formations about ten years ago. Only the US and Canada were producing oil and natural gas from shale in commercial quantities, the department said.

Monday’s assessment indicated that Russia has the largest shale oil resource, with 75bn barrels. Russia and the US were followed by China at 32bn, Argentina at 27bn and Libya at 26bn.

The report said gas from shale formations increased world natural gas resources by 47 per cent to 22,882tn cu ft.

The question of whether other countries can replicate North America’s success in drilling in shale rocks has captivated geologists and diplomats. US crude imports are at a 16-year low, reconfiguring the map of global oil trade.

“Looking at shale resources has typically been understated by outside market participants because the geology is new and the technology is growing rapidly,” said Edward Morse, head of commodities research at Citigroup.

Production from shale has helped keep a lid on crude oil prices at about $120 a barrel, giving western countries leverage to impose sanctions on Iran, a key supplier. World oil demand is about 90m barrels a day, suggesting the world shale oil resource covers 10.5 years of consumption.

The US and Canada have advantages including large domestic pipeline networks. Both countries also have enough water and specialised drilling rigs to support fracking, which involves pumping huge quantities of liquid and sand underground to crack open rocks and release energy reserves.

Private US landowners also have rights to hydrocarbons beneath their properties. According to Mr Morse, this situation is “truly unique to the United States” and makes oil and gas exploration more efficient.

The US report looked only at technically recoverable resources without regard to profitability, and warned the estimates are “highly uncertain”.

Adam Sieminski, head of the department’s Energy Information Administration, said: “Today’s report indicates a significant potential for international shale oil and shale gas, though the extent to which technically recoverable shale resources will prove to be economically recoverable is not yet clear.”

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 22:13:18

Are you prepared for a period of drawn-out market consolidation?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-10 22:15:27

ft dot com
REFILE-GLOBAL MARKETS-Dollar jumps on S&P credit revision, bond yields rise
Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:27pm EDT

* S&P drops negative outlook for U.S. government debt

* Dollar gains on the news, government debt prices fall

* Equity markets mostly flat amid unease about Fed policy

* Uncertainty reigns over when Fed might ease its bond buying

By Herbert Lash

NEW YORK, June 10 (Reuters) - The dollar rose against the yen and U.S. bond yields neared 14-month highs on Monday on improved sentiment toward the U.S. economy after rating agency Standard & Poor’s dropped its negative credit outlook for U.S. government debt.

S&P upgraded the U.S. credit outlook to “stable” from “negative,” saying the chances of a downgrade of the country’s rating is “less than one in three.”

The dollar extended gains versus the yen to hit a session high, while prices for long-dated Treasury debt slipped, continuing a selloff sparked by uncertainty over when the Federal Reserve would begin scaling back bond purchases.

The 30-year bond’s yield rose to its highest since April 2012 after the S&P revision, while the 10-year note’s yield touched 2.20 percent for just the second time since then.

German Bund futures fell to a three-month low with the September Bund futures contract settling down 54 ticks at 142.85, its lowest since mid-March.

Analysts and investors said the S&P news was unlikely to spur a sharp rally or impact speculation about when the Fed might ease back on its bond buying, but added to generally upbeat sentiment about the outlook for the U.S. economy.

Stocks fell in Europe and straddled break-even on Wall Street as investors assessed equity valuations that are no longer as attractive as last year or at the beginning of 2013. Along with uncertainty regarding the Fed, it makes a sustained rally less likely now.

“It’s enough to put the markets in a period of what I think will be drawn-out consolidation,” said Steven Einhorn, vice chairman at hedge fund Omega Advisors Inc in New York.

“Not a lot of downside, just not a lot of upside,” Einhorn said, adding stocks were likely to be range-bound for awhile.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post