June 28, 2013

Bits Bucket for June 28, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

206 Comments »

Comment by Roy G Biv
2013-06-28 01:47:12

All Quiet in Central Jersey. Newspapers are talking up the price rises, but me … I still do not see/hear of any big push on part of friends etc to buy.

Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 07:05:37

Maybe property taxes of $15,000/year are making them think about it…

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 07:30:06

Banana,

You’re so obtuse dude. Haven’t you learned yet from your liberal betters that high taxes = economic prosperity? $15K property taxes should be embraced by people as a sign of future economic awesomeness.

Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-28 08:33:41

Clue #1

Low taxes aren’t exactly the hot ticket for economic prosperity, either.

Our governor seems to think so. Even though his cuts are being contested by many in his own party as going too far.

His solution? Turning a “temporary” increase in sales taxes into a permanant one.

So far, I haven’t exactly seen a stampede of moving trucks heading our way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 11:49:34

WTF are you talking about (as usual).

From what I’ve seen, taxes in central NJ are generally about 2% of assessed value.

For example, Princeton Boro and Twp both have taxes around 2% (see http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/pdf/lpt/gtr12mer.pdf ).

Most of Mercer, Monmouth, and Ocean counties have effective tax rates of about 2%. Some municipalies as low as 1.3%.

Plus, state taxes are deductions for federal tax purposes. Do you think people just randomly build those big a$$ houses in NJ and CT when they leave NYC? Or do you think that they sometimes think it through? Additionally, NJ is segregated as hell and generally the public schools in white areas are the best public schools in the US on a statewide basis.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 12:23:21

“WTF are you talking about (as usual).From what I’ve seen, taxes in central NJ are generally about 2% of assessed value.”

And for an $800,000 home that’s $16,000 a year. Which is what 2Banana said. Here’s what $800K gets you in Princeton…

http://www.trulia.com/property/3122603611-16-Washington-Ave-Princeton-NJ-08540

3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, typical house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 12:35:34

That house is for sale for $365k, dawg.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2013-06-28 14:58:15

If can pay $800K for a house, nobody is going to have any empathy for you.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 12:26:43

$795,000
http://www.trulia.com/property/1042805486-1-Mansfield-Rd-Princeton-NJ-08540

2% = $16,000 annual tax

VIVA LOS TAXES!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 12:40:23

This one’s a 4,200 sq ft house in Princeton, what were you expecting? The University owns so much of the land around there (purchased to prevent development) and the local municipalities don’t want new tacky construction to junk up their area.

I’m not sure what your complaint is. It’s not like you’d want to live with the snobs around there anyway.

If you look in Hamilton (6-8 min down the road from Princeton) or maybe even in Princeton Junction (which really isn’t Princeton but is near the train to NYC) I bet you can find houses in 400k range that are more than adequate to your needs. The schools are still first rate, btw.

If you want cheap housing, you could move to Floriduh or flyover country and put your kids in the public schools with WTs and Future Trayvons.

 
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 12:46:37

Here’s what I’d buy if I was buying a house in central NJ. It’s on 2.1 acres backing up to preserved land.

http://www.trulia.com/property/3119226668-148-Carter-Rd-Princeton-NJ-08540

The kitchen and bathrooms need to be redone, obviously. But the location and rest of the house are quite nice. It’s small, but then again, if you want a 4k sq ft McMansion, best to look other places in NJ - - there are plenty. Try Salem or Gloucester counties.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 15:58:41

Point was paying $15K a year in taxes isn’t unheard of in NJ and it actually quite common.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-28 08:20:01

I know a lot of people here in Tucson. No one has house-buying fever.

Comment by prayer walker
2013-06-28 08:43:04

Same in my nabe. We must get new friends I suppose.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2013-06-28 11:10:52

Thanks to RAL and his advice to sit tight. I have talked several people from catching a falling knife.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 20:10:50

In my own sphere, I’ve dissuade a dozen or maybe even 16 people from making the tragic error of paying these massively inflated housing prices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57(?)
2013-06-28 02:55:52

Here’s my thought for the day: Are you kidding me?

A one percent rise in mortgage rates to . . . . . . 4 percent . . . . . will crush the market? Kill the low end and first time house debtors?

Are we back to borrowing every possible penny we can? “Starter homes” of $400K? In space, no one really can hear you scream.

In 2009 and 2010 though, I did some contract work for one of the big lender/servicers going through their loan files to identify fraud, robosigning and the like. Oh my, if you could see what I saw.

I also did some of this for borrowers and “investors.” Got the money up front of course. Succeeded in stopping many foreclosures and forcing loan modifications and in one case, complete debt cancellation.

In the end, I had sympathy for neither. Borrowers were greedy and stupid, lenders were greedy, stupid and malevolent.

And I see we’re back for round II.

The Dallas and Austin markets (I split time) are both in the worst bubbles I have ever seen. I’d say this will end badly but I don’t know, people are just pouring in here for the jobs. What jobs you ask? Beats me.

Hi, Alena! I am so glad you recovered successfully. Nice to see so many familiar people.

Comment by michael
2013-06-28 06:49:53

welcome back tex.

Comment by rms
2013-06-28 07:10:32

+1 It’s been a while.

 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2013-06-28 06:54:16

“And I see we’re back for round II.”

Round II will boost the comps, and since the banks hold a lot of these comps their balance sheets end up getting a boost.

Which, IMHO, is what this is all about.

Comment by Combotechie
2013-06-28 06:57:37

A little shorthand here …

“Boost the comps” = “boost the value of the comps”

“banks hold a lot of these comps” = ” banks hold a lot of the mortgages of these comps.”

Boost the value of the comps and you boost the value of the mortgages that back the comps.

Comment by Combotechie
2013-06-28 07:00:05

Plus, those on the Stay and Pay or Walk Away fence may decide to keep staying and keep paying.

And if they do this then there’ll be less houses dumped onto the market AND more money going into the banks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 15:30:12

I agree combo. I think it’s a concerted effort for certain special banksters to unload their bad MBS onto the F-word GSEs. *Pinky swear*

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 06:55:11

It is ALL about leverage.

Insane leverage.

It is great when it is going your way.

But a 1-2% move the other way can wipe you out.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 07:10:47

“But a 1-2% move the other way can wipe you out.”

Completely.

 
Comment by Overtaxed
2013-06-28 07:46:58

“But a 1-2% move the other way can wipe you out”

But a 1-2% move the other way can wipe THE BANK out

There, fixed it for ya. :) Welcome to the age of 0 personal responsibility.

 
 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-06-28 07:07:45

I’m in DFW and the 3 out of 4 homes listed by Zillow and ZipRealty have had lots of price reductions in the last few weeks. A few of them have cut prices several times so maybe they are trying to dump them before the market freezes up.

Comment by txchick57(?)
2013-06-28 07:26:36

Have you seen the cover of this month’s D magazine?

I’m not saying people aren’t greedy as hell here, they are.

I got a place in Austin on acreage for cash a few years ago.

Comment by oxide
2013-06-28 11:51:55

What’s on the cover of D?

Welcome back, tbw. We lost some old regulars, and gained some new ones. There are a lot of name changes too. I’m sure you figured this out, but Whac-a-Bubble is the old Get Stucco/Professor Bear.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 07:35:49

“The Dallas and Austin markets (I split time) are both in the worst bubbles I have ever seen. I’d say this will end badly but I don’t know, people are just pouring in here for the jobs. What jobs you ask? Beats me.”

You guys crack me up. Yesterday all I read was how a $100K job was beneath everyone here and how you all made $200K working 1/2 the hours. But given all that, you have no idea where the jobs are.

Comment by txchick57(?)
2013-06-28 07:46:52

I neither have not want a job, dude. The market pays me. Did you see that Weil, Gotshal is laying off lawyers and staff? Lawyers still have a tough go of it here if they didn’t graduate in the top 10% of a Tier 1 school.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 08:04:01

WHaaa? This is all so confusing. I was told yesterday that

a) lawyers make $200K by barely breathing

and

b) starting salaries for lawyers right out of school is $120K

and

c) you’d have to be crazy to go into IT and “ONLY” make $100K when you can make $200K doing all sorts of other things (including law) and working 1/2 the hours

So which is it?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by elmer fud
2013-06-28 08:45:01

c) you’d have to be crazy to go into IT and “ONLY” make $100K when you can make $200K doing all sorts of other things (including law) and working 1/2 the hours

So which is it?”

You already know what it is, It’s hard to find the really top notch technically people that are needed for rapid growth in a zero sum game economy.

They used to go to start-ups for equity.

 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-06-28 08:46:14

She probably just doesn’t know.
The jobs she’s missing is that State Farm is moving 10k employees (probably not net 10k new), that Kohls just moved a ‘corporate headquarters’ in, that Motorolla is going to open factory to build some smartphone, honest Warren Buffett is building a giant Nebraska Furniture Mart complex, as examples. Is that enough to cover the massive building? Probably not, but who knows?

As for lawyers, Weil Gotshal may be laying off but Jackson Walker is expanding. Business is as business does.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 08:55:55

There’s a reason smart people are avoiding IT like the plague. They know that they will always be offshoring, H1-Bs and age discrimination to deal with. An most IT people do not make 100K.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 10:59:56

” An most IT people do not make 100K.”

Just like most people in all profession don’t. Aside from maybe physician, is there really any profession where one is guaranteed to make six figures? I mean realistic professions, not NFL player or things like that.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:07:02

http://www.bls.gov/ro6/fax/dfw_ces.htm

Look at chart 3. Dallas and Houston are #1, #2 nationally in terms of job growth. 100,000 new jobs in the past year in both cities.

But yeah, I guess TxChick is right. No jobs are being created in Texas. I’ll take her word over BLS data.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:26:48

” rapid growth in a zero sum game economy.”

The Democrat mode of thinking where everyone is fighting for a piece of a stagnant pie. If I get a raise that means someone has to take a paycut. Doesn’t work like that. When the pie grows everyone benefits. And the pie is growing quite nicely these days.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2013-06-28 11:30:55

” An most IT people do not make 100K.”

I have never saved less than 100K every year my entire career since the late 80’s. It’s more difficult to make a living and it is much easier to make money has been my experience. I only worked 3 months for an employer in my entire life and I was clock watching at that job.

Hated it.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 11:58:32

The Democrat mode of thinking where everyone is fighting for a piece of a stagnant pie. If I get a raise that means someone has to take a paycut. Doesn’t work like that. When the pie grows everyone benefits. And the pie is growing quite nicely these days.

Do you know how I know you’ve never taken an economics class?

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-28 12:20:34

And the pie is growing quite nicely these days.

Is it? Are you sure? Or is it just the piece you can see?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-28 14:03:50

. If I get a raise that means someone has to take a paycut. Doesn’t work like that. When the pie grows everyone benefits

Sounds like you favor an increase in the minimum wage. Make that pie grow.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:00:24

“Sounds like you favor an increase in the minimum wage. Make that pie grow.”

Sure, let’s make it $1000 an hour. Then everyone will be rich.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-28 16:23:05

Then everyone will be rich.

Sure would make that pie grow. Or does it only work when rich people get the money?

 
 
Comment by Weed Wacker™
2013-06-28 17:09:31

I don’t need a job because I own a house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 15:35:17

Slithers:

TXChick is a day trader by heart, and she’s mean enough to kill you with her bare toe. Watch out, this is gonna be fun. Why, with the return of the Texas Chick, I almost wish Eddie-tard and that other freak would come back too.

Comment by ahansen
2013-06-28 23:30:23

^^^This.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-06-28 07:44:22

Borrowers were greedy and stupid, lenders were greedy, stupid and malevolent.

Outstanding!

Good to see you back, tx.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-28 07:54:37

“A one percent rise in mortgage rates to . . . . . . 4 percent . . . . . will crush the market? Kill the low end and first time house debtors?”

This bond market selloff has only just begun. It could continue for decades from here…

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-28 08:21:01

Welcome back, Chick!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2013-06-28 09:44:30

June 27, 2013, 3:05 p.m. EDT
Scared of a 4.5% mortgage? We survived 17.5%

Mortgage rates have shot up to a two-year high, but don’t be too quick to assume this will scare away home buyers. Housing analysts say the market has done just fine under harsher conditions.

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 12:01:29

Ya no kidding. We all thought your stock crashed and you ended up living in chateau de cardboard.

B.R. (Frmrly Seattle Renter)

 
Comment by talon
2013-06-28 13:48:22

Welcome back! I missed your comments on the market, which were usually orders of magnitude more accurate than those of most analysts.

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-06-28 23:21:12

Looking forward to hearing about your adventures in debtorland :-)

 
 
Comment by Patrick
2013-06-28 05:04:06

Overtaxed / Joe re: pay levels

I have always envied those who can work miracles with computers.

I have wisely paid large legal bills in my business career.

70 to 80 hour weeks for 100 to 200k - wow.

When I had an oil service company I was signing take home pay cheques of over $5,000 per week for high school graduate tradesmen (welder, pipe fitter, etc) working six twelves. They often took home more than $250,000 a year.

And they were worth every penny too.

Comment by Overtaxed
2013-06-28 06:50:55

Not all our weeks are 70-80 hours. This week has been really light (which is why I have time to post here). The big problem with jobs like mine is that, while you may only “work” 40-50 hours a week, you’re often doing that while traveling. So you leave on Monday, bill Tuesday to Friday (call it 40 hours) and get back home at midnight on Friday night. You put in your 40, but it required an entire week away from home to do it. And, while sitting in a hotel room isn’t exactly “work” it’s also not “free time”, that’s for sure.

My point in the original post wasn’t to tell the world how wonderful or cool my job is (I do, however, enjoy it and wouldn’t trade it for most other professions out there), it was to show people that there are, in fact, lots of jobs out there that pay over that mythical 100K level. The initial attack on my first post was that “nobody makes that much in IT”. Where, in fact, a TON of people make that much. Yes, there are sacrifices (as there are for welders and pipefitters, I’m sure), but the jobs are there for those with the skills/interest and willingness to do the work.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2013-06-28 07:07:41

A travel load like that makes a big impact on one’s life. Like you say, sitting in a hotel room isn’t exactly free time.

Working on the road on a regular basis gets old very quickly.

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-28 07:09:51

Overtaxed should earn more with that kind of traveling.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 10:29:36

Working on the road on a regular basis gets old very quickly.

As for it being a “mini-vacation” … maybe if you’re someplace cool. But for the most part it’s probably someplace ordinary and what can you really do after work except go out to eat and drink?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-28 10:39:55

My road trips were/are to places like Lincoln, Nebraska, Alton, Illinois, or Salina, Kansas (at 1am).

I’ve been to DC and Austin, Texas, but unlike the professional class, all you see of the town is a hangar, the fast food joints closest to the airport, and the drive to/from the airline terminal.

 
Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-28 10:52:33

My favorite road trip was going to Little Rock, to disassemble an airplane that had bellied in (pilot forgot to put the gear down) and load it on a flatbed on Friday am.

On Thursday, started at 8am, had the thing ready to load at 10pm. Went to the hotel, uniforms saturated with sweat, jet fuel, hydraulic fluid, etc.

The hotel we stayed at happened to have one of the current popular yuppie hangouts inside. Got to the hotel, one of the guys says it would be nice to go by the bar and get a beer, but by the time we got cleaned up, it would be pushing midnight.

The -fixr assumed his leadership position, and said “Why go get cleaned up? We’re customers, and who are we going to impress?” So, we entered the club.

And the crowd parted. Everyone stepped aside. For the whole time we were there, it was like there was a 10 foot diameter bubble was around us. It was almost as if they wished we weren’t there. So we stood in a back corner, and drank a beer.

We had to drive a Ryder truck down there with all of our tools. Found out that truckers get pizzed off when you ask to see their Red Sovine albums. But I digress……

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 10:55:13

There’s a fun time to be had everywhere. If you go in with the attitude “this sucks I’m going to Nebraska, shoot me” then you’ll be a miserable SOB while there.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 12:59:13

There’s a fun time to be had everywhere. If you go in with the attitude “this sucks I’m going to Nebraska, shoot me” then you’ll be a miserable SOB while there.

What can you do there besides eat and drink?

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:02:34

Colorado, do you carry your trombone with you wherever you go to make Womp Womp Debbie Downer noise?

 
Comment by Pete
2013-06-28 16:04:52

“What can you do there besides eat and drink?”

Strike up a conversation w/the locals about how they don’t seem to have much of a progressive movement there.

 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 07:55:02

Travel is what you make of it. When I travel I rarely sit in a hotel room. I take advantage of where I am. At the very least, I’ll find a good restaurant and have an expensive meal on the client. And usually I’ll also explore the city and if I’m there long term get to know the city and immerse myself in with the locals. I view it as paid for mini-vacations that I otherwise would never take.

Overtaxed,

As a valued employee you have wiggle room on the travel as well. I learned early on that you don’t have to be home at midnight on Friday. Tell your boss, you’re leaving at 1pm on Friday to catch the 2:30 flight that gets you home at 6:00pm. Chances are he’ll say that’s fine.

Comment by Overtaxed
2013-06-28 08:06:41

Yup, I try to do as much of that as I can; it’s just hard sometimes. You’re tired after a long day and really don’t feel like another few hours socializing (at least not me, I’m a private person and like me quiet time). But, yes, there are some benefits. The biggest is probably the frequent flyer/hotel programs; my vacations are pretty much free for the most part because I rack up so many points. That’s probably work 5-10K/yr, depending on how you look at it. And, of course, it’s tax free, which is wonderful! It is fun to see different areas; I’ve been working in Lexington for the past few weeks; expected to hate the area, and actually am really liking it. Worked in Vegas a few years ago for a month; thought I was gonna love it; absolutely hated it, could not wait to get out of there every Friday!

And yes, there is certainly flexiblity. I just started a new job, so I can’t really drop the “I’m leaving at noon” bit yet. But, at my old employer, I used to leave early on Friday and come in later on Monday.

I’m not saying it’s awful, it has it’s high points. It does take something from you though. Not being home for 4-5 days at a time really does make you feel disconnected from your home/family/community. And, of course, there’s your private time that’s adversely impacted as well; if you’re out to dinner until 10PM every night, that’s a lot of time that you’re not doing things with your loved ones.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 08:18:35

I rarely do the “let’s all go out for drinks after work” thing. To me THAT’s work. And if I’m putting in a 10 hour day the last thing I want is to spend another 2-3 hours with the same people over drinks or dinner talking about the same BS we just talked about all day long.

Definitely agree on the FF stuff. Over the years I’ve taken vacations worth hundreds of thousands of dollars using miles/points. My wife and I flew first class to the Maldives on BA and stayed a week in a cabana suite. The retail price of that trip was about $25,000. I wouldn’t even think about thinking of something like that without the miles/points I had.

 
Comment by Overtaxed
2013-06-28 08:23:33

“I rarely do the “let’s all go out for drinks after work” thing. To me THAT’s work.”

Couldn’t agree more. ;)

 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-06-28 08:56:33

It’s easy to tell that a huge number of people travel for work, and don’t earn anywhere near $100k since the US median individual income isn’t anywhere near $100k. All those hotels along interstates aren’t for personal travellers and planes would be empty if it weren’t for people travelling to client sites to hock their wares.

 
Comment by prayer walker
2013-06-28 09:07:31

nd if I’m putting in a 10 hour day the last thing I want is to spend another 2-3 hours with the same people over drinks or dinner talking about the same BS we just talked about all day long.

Agree 100%. One thing I have noticed though so many of my past and present co-workers (many times highly educated) were/are either very uncomfortable or totally clueless to talk about anything other than work. Sports being the exception.
I avoid any party with co-workers like plague. Not a good strategy career wise though.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 09:52:03

“It’s easy to tell that a huge number of people travel for work, and don’t earn anywhere near $100k since the US median individual income isn’t anywhere near $100k. All those hotels along interstates aren’t for personal travellers and planes would be empty if it weren’t for people travelling to client sites to hock their wares.”

There are 130 million people in the workforce. There are 45,000 commercial flights a day. Say the average number of passengers is 100 on those flights (and it’s probably less since a lot of those 45K flights are 30 seat puddle jumpers). If every single passenger on those flights were business travelers that would be That’s 4.5 million people out of 130 million people who travel for work. It’s a very, very small % of the general public. And it’s quite feasible that those people make significantly more than the median income for everyone else.

And I have never stayed at a motel along the interstate when traveling for business. I have stayed at those hotels more times than I can remember when traveling (and paying for) personally. If I need a place to sleep for 6 hours, I’ll stay at Motel 6 off the interstate for $40. If I travel for business I’m at the Hyatt for $175.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 09:54:19

“Agree 100%. One thing I have noticed though so many of my past and present co-workers (many times highly educated) were/are either very uncomfortable or totally clueless to talk about anything other than work. Sports being the exception.”

Heh. I’m a very social person, I just don’t like to socialize with the same people I’m forced to spend 40 hours a week working with. And education level has nothing to do with it.

 
Comment by Patrick
2013-06-28 15:04:16

I used to travel a lot and got super elite status - lots of freebies - but if I had more than four return trips a month I never seemed to fully recover.

I used to work from 8 am to about 10 pm with lunch and supper breaks. When I finished work I just wanted to get to the hotel and fall asleep. Always tried to get in a swim if the pool was still open. After visiting the same location for the twentieth time the locals treated you as one of them - fend for yourself !

Every location then became only as good as the local food - salmon in BC, lobster for the east coast, perch in Manitoba, white fish in northern Ontario, and artic char whenever I could get in the far north. A spot of whale blubber in the real far north, and lots of maple syrup in Quebec (fresh from the tank). Western beef - hmmm

Then along came my son on trips and wow what a difference. Instead of trying to get the trips over with, we extended them by a couple of days for his sightseeing.

Lots to look forward to with him. But I still don’t like flying more than four trips a month - no matter what the distance.

Oh - those freebies - never get a chance to enjoy the travel rewards. yet.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:04:17

“I used to work from 8 am to about 10 pm with lunch and supper breaks. ”

Your issue wasn’t travel, it was working insane hours. If I worked 14 hour days I’d be tired too, travel or no travel.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 06:07:04

wall street journal - corzine, o’brien charged in mf global collapse

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/a/SB10001424127887323873904578571681994899150?mg=reno64-wsj

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-28 06:54:51

Why not criminal charges?

Comment by michael
2013-06-28 06:58:35

didn’t eric holder already answer that?

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 06:58:50

FOO

Friend of obama

Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-28 08:35:27

BAR. Beyond All Recognition.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2013-06-28 06:12:45

QE will be around a long time.

Comment by michael
2013-06-28 06:36:03

yes…printing money is the only tool.

a lot like japan.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 07:10:01

Even when gas is $10/gal - it will still be around.

democrats will just blames the “greedy” oil companies.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 08:01:05

“democrats will just blames the “greedy” oil companies.”

Same with energy. Obama just announced a major increase in regulations for coal and natural gas generated electricity. When rates jump 50% as a result, he will give a speech blaming evil energy companies with a call for more regulation and more taxation.

It’s how the Demos roll….

 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 06:17:58

‘federal investigators have told lawmakers they have evidence that usis, the contractor that screened edward snowden for his top-secret clearance, repeatedly misled the government about the thoroughness of its background checks, according to people familiar with the matter.

the alleged transgressions are so serious that a federal watchdog indicated he plans to recommend that the office of personnel management, which oversees most background checks, end ties with usis unless it can show it is performing responsibly, the people said.

cutting off usis could present a major logistical quagmire for the nation’s already jammed security clearance process. the federal government relies heavily on contractors to approve workers for some of its most sensitive jobs in defense and intelligence. falls church-based usis is the largest single private provider for government background checks.’

http://m.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/company-allegedly-misled-government-about-security-clearance-checks/2013/06/27/dfb7ee04-df5c-11e2-b2d4-ea6d8f477a01_story.html

Comment by oxide
2013-06-28 06:53:32

Not sure if anything would have shown up on a background check for Snowden. The real issue is that a low-level contractor was given access to top secret information.

Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 07:00:39

The same way as an army E-4 got hold of the massive amount of documents in Wikileaks?

 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 13:01:45

How about we stop shooting the messenger and focus on the breech of all we hold sacred in our principles as a nation that the NSA has committed and now represents?

We went from “government of the people, by the people, and for the people” to “government of the people, by the well connected campaign donor for-profit companies, for profit.”

Why am I the only one who cares about how serious this is?

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 13:53:10

Commie talk!

 
Comment by ahansen
2013-06-28 23:42:17

No. You’re not the only one.

 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 15:23:36

Why don’t they just hire employees instead? Isn’t it overly expensive and difficult to hire and keep track of all those contractors?

Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-06-28 18:01:27

Isn’t it overly expensive and difficult to hire and keep track of all those contractors?

Never let reality get in the way of a political theory.

 
 
 
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 06:28:50

Wow, from random hood guys to billionaires…

http://twitter.com/RapGenius/status/329078531101450240

In my next life I want to be Birdman.

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-28 07:00:56

It will take 10 lifetimes for you to lose your whiteness.

Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 10:02:55

This is true. When applying to colleges, I searched for any non-whiteness in my family, including a lot of people on my dad’s side I’ve never met. The process turned out OK without the boost. In retrospect - what a waste of time, my eyes are blue which pretty much negates the chance of any non-whiteness. Not sure why I did not realize that at the time. I was hoping for an Elizabeth Warren type “miracle”.

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 10:51:41

My friend Maria (last name with lots of vowels) is of Italian background but put Hispanic on her successful application to Northwestern Law.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:37:02

“My friend Maria (last name with lots of vowels) is of Italian background but put Hispanic on her successful application to Northwestern Law.”

But as I have been told by my liberal betters, diversity is the most important part of college admission. And I have also been told by my liberal betters that lying and cheating is perfectly fine as long as the greater good is achieved. So she lied and cheated to achieve diversity which is like total super duper awesome.

VIVA MARIA!!

VIVA OBAMA!!

SI SE PUEDE!!

 
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 11:42:53

This is a smart move, I’ve only heard of one person getting busted for this. He was fully Irish but his mom remarried a hispanic man who later adopted him. The guy was white in every sense but applied as hispanic. He admitted in his message board posting that he had NEVER suffered any discrimination, though his (non biological) dad had. He posted this on a message board (stupidly) and UTexas found out. BC of the LSAC clearinghouse in law school admissions, UTexas could see all the other schools he had applied to. UTexas admissions people alerted all the other schools. And even though he’d been found out, he still attended UMichigan.

In other words, he was busted, but UMichigan just overlooked it and probably counted him as hispanic so they could appear to be more diverse. I can only hope they made him pay full tuition and didn’t give him some kind of minority scholarship. He eventually flamed out of Baker Botts in about 2 yrs. Dion Alaniz, if you want to google him.

Here is a link to a message board discussion of this instance… http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.top-law-schools.com%2Farchives%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D14%26t%3D70939%26start%3D25&ei=CtnNUazwNJXA4AP0s4DQDQ&usg=AFQjCNH-u7clq_IQhCJ9ugjyH2anAGSzhw&sig2=Soij4h9Qv9oLZfApTnYjTQ

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-06-28 13:18:24

It sounds like his only mistake was to post that message. I often think that it would be interesting to have some fair-skinned white with blond hair and blue eyes check the African-American box on their college applications. It would be interesting to see what would happen. Would an admissions office ask them to prove somehow that they African ancestry?

 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-06-28 12:31:50

When applying to colleges, I searched for any non-whiteness in my family, including a lot of people on my dad’s side I’ve never met. The process turned out OK without the boost.

The world you live in annoys me but I know it’s a cultural thing and not you personally. I’m maybe 1/16th (1/32nd?) American Indian and it didn’t even occur to me to try to use that for anything. Even if somebody found out without my help and tried to give me something based on it I’d be too embarrassed by the thought to cooperate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2013-06-28 13:15:12

There must be so many people with these fractional minority ancestries. You would think that these college admission offices would give the phenomenon some thought. First they set up admissions policies which are supposed to create diversity in the student body. Then they admit the Elizabeth Warrens of this world for the purpose of generating that diversity, but it doesn’t work, because she doesn’t really bring any non-white culture to campus.

I have a cousin who’s half Scottish and half Italian. His wife is half Irish and half Mexican. Their daughter just finished her sophomore year at Stanford. I don’t know if she checked the Hispanic box when she filled out her application, but it would pretty absurd if she did. Both of her parents have pretty good jobs, so she grew up as an upper middle class white girl. So she also brought no non-white diversity when she showed up on campus.

 
 
Comment by Rancher
2013-06-28 14:54:09

I’m northern European stock, blue eyed and white/blond and I’ve met Mexicans and Argentinians that are more nordic than me.

The class structure in both countries makes
India look benign.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 07:29:44

“I’m not a businessman. I’m a business, man.” — Jay Z

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 06:53:16

I have said it before.

Conservatives expect to live under the same laws as everyone else.

Democrats/liberals/progressives expect to be exempted from the laws they want everyone else to live under.

——————

Congress plots exit from Obamacare coverage
pioneer press | 6-28-13 | Glenn Garvin

Congress is not as stupid as you think.

I realize that is not a high bar; but still, credit must be given when credit is due. Quite often when our duly-elected political representatives get together in Washington to pass some ill-designed, over-intrusive and brutally expensive law, they recognize the difficulties it will create — and so they exempt themselves.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration?

The National Labor Relations Act?

Minimum wage laws?

None of them govern Congress.

The much-lauded Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which sends corporate executives to prison for falsifying financial data, would decimate Congress if it were applied to the federal budgeting process. Which is exactly why it doesn’t.

Once in a while, even Congress gets embarrassed by the legal loopholes it writes itself.

But when the Obamacare law was being debated, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, a longtime opponent of the legal loopholes lawmakers write for themselves, argued that if Obamacare was so great, Congress and its staff should be subject to the thing.

The preferred candidate in this case is the Office of Personnel Management, which administers federal employee benefits. Lawmakers hope the office will declare that Congress has the legal authority to continue subsidizing its own insurance even when purchased through the exchanges.

Comment by Overtaxed
2013-06-28 07:20:28

Al Gore, telling all of us to drive a Prius while climbing into a bulletproof limo that gets 3MPG on his way to a private jet?

However, this isn’t just the Dems vs. Republicans. They all do it. Republicans telling us to value religion and marriage while getting a BJ under the desk and most certainly NOT doing what Jesus (or any other religious leader) would do?

Do as I say, not as I do. It’s the mantra of politics!

Comment by snowgirl
2013-06-28 08:55:41

Legislation is about masses management. The “we are all in this together” meme is merely a vote fishing device.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 08:01:21

Conservatives expect to live under the same laws as everyone else.

You really do live in a fantasy world.

Comment by prayer walker
2013-06-28 08:38:05

With the coming permanent democratic majority, that’s all they have left.

Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 09:30:03

Marie Antoinette didn’t get it either…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 10:42:20

the coming permanent democratic majority

____________

Yeah just like after 1964 no Republican would ever win the presidency again or 1980 ushered in a permanent Republican majority or after 2008 the Democrats would hold the house for a generation

Predictions about political permanency are as useful as 10 day weather forecasts. So tell me, what’s the weather going to be like next Friday?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 14:13:07

And how many Republicans voted for or are supporting the exemption?

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:06:20

Why shouldn’t they vote for it? Not a single Republican in the house or senate voted for this monstrosity. And they are being consistent by voting to exempt themselves from it. On the other hand about 98% of Democrats voted FOR for O’Care and now they’re voting to exempt themselves.

You really don’t see the difference? I don’t believe you.

 
 
 
Comment by michael
2013-06-28 06:54:27

with gold prices tanking…wonder if eric janszen and peter schiff are on suicide watch?

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-28 07:02:39

Saw Peter Schiff on TV the other day. He was still bullish gold.

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 09:31:04

All depends when you got “in”

Those in at $800 call it a “blip”

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 07:03:29

Are the Koreans the Japanese of the 1980s?

Koreans Snap Up U.S. Real Estate
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 06/28/2013 | Chosun Ilbo

Koreans were the second most enthusiastic Asian buyers of U.S. real estate after Singaporeans in the first half of this year, ahead of the mainland Chinese.

The combined real estate investments of Koreans, Chinese and Singaporeans amounted to US$5.2 billion from January to mid-June, an all-time high, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday quoting figures from research firm Real Capital Analytics.

Koreans invested $1.83 billion in U.S. properties during this period, overtaking the Chinese ($1.52 billion). Singaporeans spent the most with $1.87 billion.

Asian investors bought mainly resorts or commercial real estate in Hawaii, high-risers in Chicago and condos in New York, the daily reported.

The main reason is the aging population in the three Asian countries, with pension funds investing in overseas markets like the U.S. to boost returns.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 10:17:42

And we know how well that worked out for the Japanese in the 1980’s. :mrgreen:

 
 
Comment by Sean
2013-06-28 07:14:30

I’ve been addicted to reading these Old Economy Steve memes. Thought some people on here may enjoy them as well:

http://m.quickmeme.com/Old-Economy-Steven/popular/2/?upcoming

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 07:35:26

That is both hilarious and depressing. Sounds like the exact career “advice” I’ve ever received from relatives born before 1950.

Comment by Sean
2013-06-28 08:00:11

I am an airline pilot. When I was looking for my first regional job years ago my mother in law said “Did you call the airport and see if they are hiring. Look in the phone book and get their number and call them.” And she was serious.

“Ummmm…..that’s NOT how it works, and phone book?”

I know she means well, but the world they live in has vastly changed without them. Only thing is it has all worked out for them.

Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-28 08:41:55

Hey, what are you seeing on airline pilot recalls?

We just had three guys quit their corporate jobs to go back. At almost double their coporate pay.

Three doesn’t sound like much, but the job market is fairly small around here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 08:52:21

The DHL guy I mentioned the other day was furloughed for about a year. He was recalled and is making 200K+ again.

If you’re a techie, you don’t get “furloughed” when times are tough, you are dismissed and when things pick up you might be able to reapply for your old job, unless of course the company has a “do not rehire” policy.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 10:00:32

“If you’re a techie, you don’t get “furloughed” when times are tough, you are dismissed and when things pick up you might be able to reapply for your old job, unless of course the company has a “do not rehire” policy.”

If you’re a smart techie you do some independent work and bill twice the hourly rate you made as an employee.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 10:16:22

If you’re a smart techie you do some independent work and bill twice the hourly rate you made as an employee.

I’ve had a few headhunters contact me for contract work. Turns out the hourly rate is about the same as what you get paid as full time, except no bennies and no paid time off. And once the contract is up after a few months you get to search for another gig.

In some cases I’ve seen when the contract pay is less than full time pay.

You might get “double” if you have a skill that is very hot and in short supply, and the half life on those is short, so last year’s “hot skill” could quickly become “dime a dozen”.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 10:24:29

The DHL guy I mentioned the other day was furloughed for about a year. He was recalled and is making 200K+ again.

I recall when I was laid off 12 years ago. An elderly gentleman acquaintance asked me how long until I would be called back. The look on his face was priceless when I explained to him that it doesn’t work that way anymore (unless you’re in a union like my DHL pilot friend).

My sis-in-law is a bilingual teacher in the Raleigh, NC area. She is not union. At the end of every school year the bulk of the teachers do not get their contracts renewed and they all scramble to find a new position with another school district. Of course this means they don’t accumulate seniority with any district and they all make the entry level wage, which in NC is pretty low, regardless of years of experience. Sis-in-law (unlike my sister in Winston-Salem) is now teaching at a year round school, so no long lazy summer for her!

 
Comment by (Neo-) Jetfixr
2013-06-28 11:09:21

“Independent work” in my line doesn’t pay squat. I’m doing better than most, because of my airplane specific training, I can get $70/hr (the going rate is $50, and has been for years).

Even at $50 hour, you might not get a call for 3 months, then the guy wants you to drop everything else, and come fix his AOG airplane.

A lot of airplane problems are intermittent. You might think you have the problem identified, and fix something. Doesn’t matter if the thing you fixed need to be fixed or not, if it doesn’t take care of the original problem, you have trouble getting paid.

I’m finding that, even at $70/hour, I’m working for near minimum wage, when you figure in all of the unbillable overhead time. (25 miles/45 minutes between regular job and the P/T deal)

Then you consider that any certificate action related to the part time stuff also kills your ability to do the full time gig.

And the PTB wonder why young guys with any smarts are staying away from the aviation maintenance business.

 
Comment by bluto
2013-06-28 11:21:19

My GF faces similar experiences as a teacher in Sonoma Co., California….yearly layoffs, a game of musical chairs with less seats each year, reduced benefits, etc. The schools here ARE union but that does not help much as there are something like 45 (!!!) separate districts within the county all with their own contracts and if you move to a new one (often necessary if you want to stay employed) you typically only get credit for 5 years seniority so another layoff at the end of the year is highly probable

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:30:47

“I’ve had a few headhunters contact me for contract work. Turns out the hourly rate is about the same as what you get paid as full time,”

That means you are either being overpaid as a FTE or you’re not negotiating very well with headhunters. As a general rule of thum, hourly rates are 2X FTE hourly rates. And that includes the full compensation package with bennies, vacation, FICA, etc.

EG: you make $80K salary and another $30K in benefits, FICA, vacation. That’s $110K a year total which is about $50/hr. As an indie you should get $100/hr minimum.

 
Comment by Sean
2013-06-28 12:48:29

Hey Jetfixer,

I’m still a bit younger so I am in the camp of guys waiting for the older guys to bypass so mainline jobs can open up. I’m still at my regional and waiting for the mainline call,, like most people. One of my friends is furloughed with NetJets and doesn’t expect a recall anytime in the next decade. Even the guys that get recalled are either at home and loving it or are at a place like JetBlue, where you can make a great career based on your seniority.

Corporate gigs are great, until they let you go. It’s very tough to sustain a career as a corporate guy as flying the airplane is secondary to running the company. I met a guy who had a great job, nice plane, treated him very well and loved life. His coworkers were the best and the passengers (Upper level management and their friends) treated him with dignity. He’d bend over backwards to make his company succeed. He worked for Enron.

On my level we can’t find anyone to come fly for us. The recent glut of people getting their private,commercial and building time has gone down. Couple that with the 1500 hour rule and the fact that your first year pay is $25k - not too many people are jumping in this profession.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 12:57:26

That’s $110K a year total which is about $50/hr. As an indie you should get $100/hr minimum.

Nope. They want to pay $40-50 per hour. No thanks.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 13:04:22

I remember when contract work used to pay double the hourly full time rate, and I used to partake of it. I think that today you need a security clearance and DoD experience to get that kind of pay.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:08:53

“Nope. They want to pay $40-50 per hour. No thanks.”

Who is “they”? Recruiters? Of course they offer 40-50. Their profit is the difference from what you get paid and what they bill you out. They’re billing this position out at $125. They offer 40-50 in the hopes that someone is idiotic enough to say yes. Very few are.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:10:09

“I remember when contract work used to pay double the hourly full time rate, and I used to partake of it. I think that today you need a security clearance and DoD experience to get that kind of pay.”

Security clearance and sweet DoD gig means 3X FTE rate. Good old fashioned corporate gig is 2X rate.

 
 
 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2013-06-28 19:58:03

‘I’ve been addicted to reading these Old Economy Steve memes.’

LOL

Love those memes with a random dude on them:

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/250/007/672.jpg

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-06-28 07:53:18

Immigration, Democrat style:

1) Enter the country illegally.
2) Wait around for many years while working, paying no taxes and enjoying bennies.
3) Be granted legal immigration status.

Comment by homie don't play houses
2013-06-28 08:01:24

AKA voter registration.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 08:08:01

Are we having second thoughts about Hope and Change boys and girls? Sorry no refunds. You voted for this twice. Enjoy….

Comment by prayer walker
2013-06-28 08:35:59

You think people who voted for Obama had problems with it? It’s a feature not a bug.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 10:03:20

“You think people who voted for Obama had problems with it? It’s a feature not a bug.”

I think there are a lot of people who bought the “Obama is a pragmatic centrist and Romney/McCain are frothing right wing radicals who will enslave women and minorities” BS who are now having second thoughts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 13:14:57

They BOUGHT their tickets….they knew what they were getting into…

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 14:20:15

Slithers:

Remember, Republicans LOVE illegal labor.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:13:08

HBBers crack me up. You all enthusiastically vote for Obama. He and the rest of the ‘Rats pass amnesty and reject every Republican border security amendment proposed. And from all that your brains process Republicans Love ILLEGALS.

You people really do live in an alternative reality.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 16:32:04

Do not pretend that a vote for a Republican is a vote against artificially low wages. It is not.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-06-28 07:57:56

Seems everyone wants Paula Deen to recover from being racis.

http://www.today.com/money/how-paula-deen-can-recover-after-fall-grace-6C10480642

[beware: scary pics of TV makeup. Best off not scrolling down]

” The TV cook and restaurateur tearfully opens up to TODAY’s Matt Lauer about the recent controversy surrounding a discrimination lawsuit filed by a former employee, saying the using the N-word is “just not a part” of who she is and that despite the fallout, she is glad she didn’t lie under oath… [zing!]

“One by one, Deen has seen her vast empire crumble as diabetes drug maker Novo Nordisk, Target, Wal-Mart, Home Depot, the Food Network, QVC, Smithfield Foods and Caesars Entertainment have all terminated their partnerships with her. ”

—-

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 08:12:49

She can just give a few million to Shakedown Jesse (so his kids can get another Anheuser-Busch distributorship) and she will be forgiven.

Racism® is a business.

http://www.jessejackson.org/

Comment by rms
2013-06-28 23:01:47

+1 LOL! So true!!

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 09:29:13

So she takes her pile of cash and sails into the sunset?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 10:19:04

That woman is hideous.

Comment by oxide
2013-06-28 12:28:36

Probably not hideous. Just old. I guess the makeup — espeically now that they need to make people up for HD –makes people look really good or really bad.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-06-28 10:30:38

Paula Deen’s ‘New Testament’ cookbook #1 on Amazon

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/06/27/paula-deen-new-testament-cookbook-number-one-amazon/#ixzz2XX77nGzk

PS…the word cracker is not a racist term…..

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-06-28 10:46:19

Did she the words “cracka” and “n*gga” ??????

Oh wait - those are terms of endearment if you have the correct amount of pigment like obama son Trayvon

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:33:28

If St. Barrack had a 3rd daughter would she look like Jenteel?

 
 
 
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 10:04:02

In honor of 2Brony… “what libs want”. Enjoy.

————————————-

libs don’t want you to live in a nice house in the suburbs.

libs want to force you to live in a crumbling, rat-infested tenement filled with mexicans on welfare (all 6 teenage sons are in a gang). libs want you to get beat up by these miscreants every once in a while, just so you understand what white privilege is all about.

libs don’t want you to own a car.

libs want you to take a packed smelly cattle car train to the unemployment office every day (no jobs for whitey due to affirmative action), where you will be exposed to the ‘diversity’ of queer junkies with AIDS flinging syringes on the seats, black muggers and pickpockets stealing your wallet and iPhone, a fat black mammy taking up 3 seats and screaming at the top of her lungs on her govt-issued Obamaphone with 8 niglets in tow, and a bunch of Arabs reeking of BO and reciting Quranic verses at the top of their lungs.

libs don’t want you to marry a decent, pretty, modest girl.

libs want you to be in an ‘open relationship’ with a 350-pound, obese, bisexual bulldyke with hairy pits (if you’re going to date women at all).

this is the life libs are trying to give you.

Comment by goon squad
2013-06-28 10:57:52

Subtitled: inside the mind of a Drudge Report reader.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:34:46

I always laugh at libs who get so worked up over Drudge. 90% of his links are to MSM sources like WaPo, NY Times. He;s linking to your people. Why are you so upset?

 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 13:46:06

Dude, just ignore Smithers. He’s too stupid to realize he’s being played by a two headed snake.

Anyone who thinks the NY times is liberal clearly hasn’t done their research. There was an empirical study done of the column inches devoted to a pro-establishment(conservative) topic with an outcome favorable to the status quo and one topic nearly identical but with an anit-establishment outcome.

The times devoted dozens of times more column inches to the pro-status quo outcome.

Liberal indeed.

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 16:16:36

“Anyone who thinks the NY times is liberal clearly hasn’t done their research. ”

Dude how far to the left do you have to be to think the NY Slimes is right? Lemme guess you also think MSNBC is just slightly to the left. LOL!!

And lemme also guess, you are an independent critical thinking moderate who just always happens to vote Democrat.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 13:38:48

The minute a person uses the word “lib”, I immediately discount them. Just like those who try to discredit women by calling them “feminists”. You don’t gain agreement by turning a view-point into an insult.

Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 14:10:26

Don’t sweat it Uncle. People like that need a term like “lib” to assign to anyone that doesn’t agree with their (bubble)world view.

If you think it’s wrong that we pay more per capita for health care than any other nation in the world but finish 37th in outcomes, why you’re just a dirty liberal. Anyone who disagrees with any part of the official conservative narrative absolutely MUST be Karl Marx’s gay lover. Or their unwitting follower. there can be no independent thought.

To be honest, the thought did occur that Smithers is just Ben using an alt-id to have a bit of fun with us, but unfortunately I know people in real life that really are just like that.

 
 
 
Comment by joe the IRA stuffer
2013-06-28 10:32:31

Hey RAL, check out the advice from “Glen” in IL on this mrlandlord.com post re: Realtors.

http://www.mrlandlord.com/landlordforum/display.php?id=14081483#14081495

Glen FTW!

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 10:38:23

I talked to a Turd today. Apparently the NAR propaganda isn’t materializing into sales. “I don’t see it happening” the turd says. Heh. Surprised?

Comment by oxide
2013-06-28 12:34:20

No, not surprised. I called this new rise in prices a “bubblet” for a reason. What happened is that the bottom feeders came in to bottom feed. The MSM saw this and desperately wanted to bring back the good times and so wrote headlines like “Is Housing Back?” A few knife-catchers got caught, just enough to pack the magazines with anecdotal flipper data, while the silent majority is shakin’ their heads like HBB.

In other news, the two houses that I’ve been watching have disappeared from the online sites. Not a peep from Zillow, Redfin, or Trulia. One lawn sign is “under contract” and the other sign — well the post is there but the sign itself has been removed. I don’t know what’s going on.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 13:28:47

Sounds about right.

 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 11:52:01

More evidence of Great Depression 2.0 in Spokane:

Spokane Journal Of Business
June 20, 2013

The market for newly constructed homes is staging a welcome comeback, sources in the homebuilding industry say. The city of Spokane issued 96 building permits for single-family homes in the first five months of 2013, up 43 percent from a year-earlier period, and the highest in five years, says Julie Happy, spokeswoman for the city…….The median sales price for all homes sold through the MLS through the first five months of the year was $161,000, up 5.9 percent from the year-earlier period……The average valuation of homes permitted in unincorporated Spokane County this year through May was $387,800, up 19 percent from a year earlier, while the permit valuation for new single-family homes in the city of Spokane was $279,300, an increase of 6.6 percent compared with the year-earlier period.

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 13:33:31

Bring on the building! More building means lower prices. Wooooooohoo.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 20:06:04

And we’re going to keep adding more and more inventory until resale prices are driven in the ground like a timber pile in dilating sand.

 
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 11:53:18

I felt this little troll from yesterday needed a response:

Comment by “Uncle Fed, why wont’ you love ME?”
2013-06-27 20:22:54

Men are going “on strike” because American society has taught them that they should expect a woman to take care of everything. It’s hardly realistic to argue that the men have no incentives. They are paid more to do the same job with less education and lower expectations. If they want to “backlash” over that, then they will find their lives a bit more difficult than necessary.

Wow I bet that sounded great at the feminist movement in 1973, but in today’s world it simply isn’t true:

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html

And considering that men are now disadvantaged in education and becoming more so every day, the question has to be asked:

When will women stop blaming men for their own shortcomings?

Anyone who hangs around the CS or engineering department long enough at any university can attest that (most) women are simply unwilling or unable to learn the necessary skills to get these higher paying jobs after college, and it certainly isn’t because they aren’t welcome. Computer geeks would (literally - really) give their left nut if there were suddenly just as many women as men that were passionate about software/engineering as them, but it just isn’t happening.

Please stop blaming us when you’re communications, anthropology, or art history degree doesn’t pay off. You had your chance.

Finally, I think it’s only fair to mention that the most deadly and hazardous jobs in the country are almost exclusively done by Men, and it’s not because women are being passed over - they’re simply not applying.

If you’re so concerned about equality then you won’t mind giving up Alimony and that we insist that women be registered for the draft right? RIGHT?

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2013-06-28 12:06:55

What the liberals want is a woman with a BA in 14th Century French Poetry working at Starbucks to make the same as man with an MA in Comp. Sci working at Google. Cuz anything else would be sexist and unfair (and probably racist too).

Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 12:27:34

You keep using this word “liberal.” I do not think it means what you think it means.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2013-06-28 14:19:04

The liberals also want to fit you out in a leather teddy and parade you down main street on a long black leash. There is no limit to their depravity.

 
Comment by Rancher
2013-06-28 15:07:24

Exactamunto!!

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-28 12:28:00

Anyone who hangs around the CS or engineering department long enough at any university can attest that (most) women are simply unwilling or unable to learn the necessary skills to get these higher paying jobs after college, and it certainly isn’t because they aren’t welcome. Computer geeks would (literally - really) give their left nut if there were suddenly just as many women as men that were passionate about software/engineering as them, but it just isn’t happening.

Watch their heads explode when they learned that one of the early pioneers of American computing was…

… Admiral Grace Hopper.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2013-06-28 12:29:19

BTW, I used to rent from a computer programmer/sysadmin. She could program circles around most of her GE coworkers.

But there was that thing called gender discrimination. It was why she couldn’t get ahead there.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 13:05:58

I don’t know … I’ve met more than a few ladies who were able to climb the ladder and get promoted to Principal Engineer or higher.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 13:21:12

In Colorado:

You don’t work in the engineering or computing fields, do you? The few women who get hired and promoted are always waaaaaayyyy more competent and qualified than men with equivalent positions, yet they are still paid less for the same work. It is illogical to say that a single promoted woman actually disproves gender discrimination.

Why just look at Big Richard. He complains that boys are “disadvantaged” at school, but that’s only because boys can’t do math or study. Then he demands that women stop blaming the in-power men for “their own shortcomings”. THEN he continues to claim that women are only being paid less because they do different jobs, just blatantly disregarding all the data showing otherwise. Women are paid less for the SAME jobs, even with more education, experience, hours per week, etc. If that’s not discrimination, then what is?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-06-28 14:00:50

I would say (from my limited experience) that it’s tough to get promoted to Principal Engineer regardless of gender. I would say that the ladies who get promoted are good, but then again, so are the guys. YMMV, of course.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 15:41:34

Colorado:

Our principal engineer is not an engineer. He is a man. A highly qualified woman was passed over for the job many times before finally being promoted to a sort of feminine “executivey” position. Yeah, she is awesome and he is not.

 
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 12:46:55

Thank you for proving my point.

 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 13:12:45

Hello Big Richard:

Just letting you know that I work with engineers and software geeks all day every day. I myself am a scientist by training, but I switched careers in order to earn more money.

In the engineering and computing fields, most males are extremely hostile toward women. They go out of their way to make sure that all women at the company understand that we are not wanted here. Period. The men persistently take credit for the accomplishments of women, keep the women out of the loop, and criticize womens work beyond belief. The better a womans work is, the more it is criticized. Then they all form a little circle of protection around their bro-ness, ensuring that no man is left behind.

Real world? Despite the huge and obvious advantages that males receive in today’s society, they are still falling behind. Women and girls are advancing faster because they are more energetic, responsible, and intelligent. American men today are spoiled. Very disappointing.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 14:04:38

Deep fried cheesecake.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-06-28 14:37:43

In the engineering and computing fields, most males are extremely hostile toward women. They go out of their way to make sure that all women at the company understand that we are not wanted here. Period.

I have never seen this at any place I’ve worked. I’m sure it happens in some places, but not *every* place. I don’t know the probabilities, but I’ve worked in a lot of places and I’ve been in the workforce for decades so my experience isn’t zero. We would be happy to hire females but 99% of the people who apply are male. And over the years I’ve worked with plenty of females, some good, some bad. Same with males.

If you see the behavior you’re describing at every place you work I have to wonder if the problem is that you’re not as good as you think you are. The only thing in common in all the places you’ve worked is you.

Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 15:36:05

Exactly. I’ve been in IT and system engineering for now over 20 year professionally and I have never seen it either. Done a lot of contract work, in a LOT of different organizations, both government and private, and I have yet to actually witness anything like this.

I’ve worked with a few very sharp women in engineering jobs, one of which is still a very close friend, and she’ll back me up on that.

I’ve also worked with a lot of women who simply DON’T perform as well in these jobs and they almost ALWAYS blame it on discrimination. Couldn’t possibly be that they just suck at their jobs. Nope. No way. Has to be discrimination.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 15:44:29

Personal attacks will get you nowhere, male.

I have only seen this behavior coming from the engineering field. Never saw it in science. I have also seen that males have a very difficult time admitting this behavior when it happens. If you can deny that it happens, then you don’t have to worry about anyone trying to stop it. After all, as a male, YOU are the beneficiary of sexism. Why would you want it to stop?

In the long run, actually, sexism is bad for everyone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 15:46:01

Which obvious advantages? Please do list them and be specific.

Are you talking about the one where more women are admitted into college than men? Is it that advantage? Or is it the one where more women earn degrees than men?

Maybe it’s that affirmative action advantage where employers are required to hire a certain quota of men? Oh wait…

Or perhaps it’s the advantage that men have where they’re ten times less likely to die on the job? Oh wait, that’s BS too.

Since education is the single greatest predictor of earning power, and women have a clear advantage there, I would genuinely like to hear about these wonderful advantages that somehow I failed to take advantage of when I was living in a tent/car while going to college?

Please tell me about these great advantages I somehow failed to take advantage of.

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 19:06:13

There is no affirmative action program anywhere that requires anyone to admit or hire a woman over a man.

No one is complaining that men get paid more to take more dangerous jobs. I am noting that women who perform the same job as an equivalent male will earn less per hour, and that’s documented. They will also be passed up for promotions when they are the most qualified person.

It is widely recognized by women everywhere that they must perform twice as well as a man to earn the same amount of credit. You’re either “brilliant”, or you suck. Men will not admit to a middle-ground in the performance of women. Also, you have to be a GENIUS before the men will call you brilliant.

Educational texts have historically been geared to appeal to boys, not girls. Math and physics were taught by metaphor to sports and cars. When I was youngin’, I was getting too many right answers, so they took me out of math and just told me to go through the book myself. I completed three years of math in only one year. Oddly, everyone in my class still thought that a boy was better at math than me. His name was Adrian. I member that. They also put me in a class three grades higher than my own to study writing, but of course I just got beat up by a bigger girl, but I digress.

Women are earning more degrees now because they have birth control, meaning they don’t have to stay home with seven kids anymore, meaning the boys now have to compete. So step up to the plate or not, I don’t care. In the meanwhile, stop whining. You have more advantage, whether you admit it or not. The data are there.

I’d like to remind you that this whole contest got started when someone wrote that America has an anti-male culture. You can stick that one back in your pocket, pal. America has a constantly evolving culture that tends more toward equality. Live with it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-06-28 13:51:24

Biggvs Richardvs:

That Time magazine article appears to contradict the rest of what you wrote. It details how young women are earning more than young men in many American cities.

Also, I think too many people on this blog have some sort of obsession with engineering, software, etc. I’m a programmer with an engineering degree, but I know that that sort of job makes up a pretty small proportion of the jobs in the economy. And there are plenty of good jobs in other fields. It’s absurd to say people who don’t major in engineering have no chance of earning a decent income.

Comment by Biggvs Richardvs
2013-06-28 15:59:36

I think you misread what I wrote then. My whole point was that the fact that women earn more than men once you factor out marriage and children disproves or certainly casts a huge doubt on the notion that there is some kind of inherent gender bias when it comes to earnings. It’s laregly the choices they make.

This narrative is as phony and counterproductive as the one that Smithers spews out.

Women now receive a majority of college degrees. I’m old enough to remember a time when heard all the time about how girls and women were so educationally D-I-S-A-D-V-A-N-T-A-G-E-D and that this was a horrible form of sex discrimination(I think Phil Donahue did entire shows about it).

Then in 1996 the tables flipped and the same people were like crickets chirping. If it was discrimination before, isn’t it discrimination now that men are disadvantaged in that area?

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 19:10:23

Rick:

You need to review the literature more. Women still learn less than men, even after you factor in marriage, children, education, accomplishments, and hours worked.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 19:17:43

LOL!!!

Women still learn earn less …

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-06-28 13:46:45

Another peek behind the curtain. This tells you who’s really running the show (like you didn’t know):

Apparently a new scandal is brewing with the release of some leaked phone calls between leaders of Anglo Irish bank from the 2008 meltdown. They know who’s calling the shots. The arrogance is not the scandal. The scandal - not contained in the quotes below - is misleading the Irish Central Bank.

The net result is that the executives looted the bank and dumped the losses on the Irish Central Bank. Another game of “Privatize the profits, socialize the losses” executed perfectly.

The details are contained in the latest of a series of leaked phone calls published by the Irish Independent.

The so-called Anglo tapes date from September 2008 when the bank was on the verge of collapse.

Former chief executive of the bank, David Drumm, can be heard setting out the strategy for the meeting.

“Get into the f***ing simple speak: ‘We need the moolah, you have it, so you’re going to give it to us and when would that be?’ We’ll start there,” he said.

Mr Drumm was speaking on the phone to Director of Treasury John Bowe.

He said he would threaten regulators unless they wrote him a cheque.

“I’m going to keep asking the thick question: ‘When, when is the cheque arriving?’” he said.

Mr Drumm also told Mr Bowe: “And by the way, the game has changed now because really the problem now is at their [regulator's] door.

“Because if they don’t give it [7bn euro (£5.9bn] to us on Monday, they have a bank collapse. If the f***ing money keeps running out the door, the way it has been running out the door.”

The former bank chief said he would “lose the plot” and threaten to hand over the keys to the bank and walk away.

He said: “If you want the f***ing keys now, I can give them to you. So I’m relaxed about it.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23081752

Primary link with links to sub-articles:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-23093988

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 14:12:08

“Get what you can get for your house today because it’s going to be much less tomorrow for many years to come.”

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-28 16:09:38

I finished my last day on the job.

In negotiation stage for a permanent job. yeah I can’t believe I’m going out of consulting or considering it. But I do have a spreadsheet. I do know the people at the company. The salary and compensation total is very competitive with what I would be with my staffing company who would otherwise loan me out. I figure my staffing company would skim $100,000 off the contract, which is why the CEO, a friend of mine prefers to hire me as a salaried type.

I’m 54. I have a seven figure net worth already. The consulting rates are falling fast. I really don’t have a need to temp anymore since I made enough money already. And the position is in orange county. I intend to keep my Arizona address - because I have a CCW there and can own firearms which cannot be owned in California. In three years I could basically go direct hire in Phoenix and not really care about income.

$125,000. 3 weeks of vacation. 50 cents per every dollar matching 401k for up to 4% of income. health insurance and dental insurance all paid for. I think the work is mostly, if not all, commercial and some of it is with mobile devices. The other choice is $75 per hour. No bennies. And the loss in what I would take as compensation I lose by not buying this six months worth of stock, the CEO will make up for. It’s $2,000 or $3,000 - additional. So figure that as a hiring bonus.

Comment by SUGuy
2013-06-28 18:12:09

Congratulations Bill

Would you get better tax deductions as an independent?

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-28 18:23:11

Thanks! Yeah I would be better off on taxes if I stay consulting. But this is a way I can get my foot in the door of commercial work which could leave me out west for good. The group of 16 people is small. They are easy to get along with if you are a direct just like them.

If things don’t turn out I can up and leave for consulting again.

Comment by SUGuy
2013-06-28 19:00:32

Good luck

Enjoy life as it is short. Buy your dream car and date a lot. You might just find Ms. Right

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-28 19:31:50

Thanks! I hope so! Dream car and dream lady.

I’m looking for a rental with full W/D in the Irvine area. The nice thing about that area is the apartments usually have W/D included. But in the South Bay part of LA it’s very common to only have coin laundry machines.

 
 
 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-06-28 19:15:44

Take the job!

PS: Can you teach me how to do what you do? I want, like, more money.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-28 19:27:01

The sky is the limit for being a software developer. I know of old timers who started ten years before me. They are still writing software.

Comment by imaadesi
2013-06-28 20:19:06

Although one can earn a lot being a software developer or being in IT but sky is not the limit :) . It depends on one’s aptitude and how good one is and how good one’s analytical and problem solving skills are.
Here is my story, I am an Engineer and an Indian body shopping consulting company brought me here from India 10 years back @60K/year on H1B. I was at a client’s place for around 10 months and the client company (one of fortune 500) offered me a full time position and I accepted it.
I have been with the same company since then and am a US citizen now and earn gross salary (base + bonus) of 160K with 4 weeks of paid vacation + benefits (which comes to around 40K) and work full time from home.
I write code i.e. do programming sometimes but mostly I troubleshoot problems with code and performance problems.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-28 20:31:00

You’re doing better than me. My best year was 2005 when I earned $223,000. Had some $190,000 years too.

I let it drift down because my company stock purchase was a great deal.

7100-7200 shares average price below $6. Current price is above $25.

It’s staffing stock. But at some point staffing will do poorly and the stock will tank. So it’s probably a good time for me to move to direct before going direct is a trend. I have doubts because Obamacare is encouraging more temp hiring.

 
Comment by imaadesi
2013-06-28 20:58:43

I am a conservative (not political views), so I prefer to have full time position, although consulting has tempted me often but I have avoided it. Also at times senior mgmt has offered me project management and/or some I management roles, which I declined because I know I can not survive there :) , I know my weakness. I can perhaps survive as technical person / individual contributor for a very very long time.

 
Comment by tom
2013-06-29 05:05:12

For another data point, I work in Phoenix writing software and earn 147k with bennies

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-29 06:44:15

Consulting is tough,but very rewarding with its tax advantage.

I will miss the weeks when I would buy several ounces of gold and end up still with a lot of fiat to spend on women.

But still, I lived below my means for a long time, investing $1300 per month in municipal bond funds, sometimes buying a $1,000 series I bond too back when fixed rates were above 1%.

So I can now stop investing so much into municipals, probably drop to $300 per month. My income on munis is $600 per month, which is going to remain reinvested. With nearly $500,000 in government securities and my income going down I now have to increase my risk and invest more for inflation. I don’t have to increase my investing, just change my allocation of future investments and cut back on new fiat going to municipals.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-06-28 20:02:19

I hope you’re getting some per diem or some other gimme because that 125k is gonna get eaten up by thuggernment in a big way. I banked far more getting the per diem but at a much lower salary(half my current rate which isn’t much more than your “permanant” offer.) I’d jump on a contract gig at full per diem in a millisecond if it were available. What I pay in income taxes is fawkin’ highway robbery.

I think you’re right though. The consulting world is shrinking and increasingly competitive. Civil eng, heavy and highway anyways.

Good luck and choose wisely Brother.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-28 20:19:44

I’ll put it this way: My recruiter is only allowing $75 per hour. $150k no frills for 2,000 hours.

The direct is $125,000 + the 2% matching 401k…$2,500. Plus three weeks paid vacation so I can use my time share and use my air miles but just pay my membership fee of 1,000 for the week and get paid for it. 7 holidays.

Health care insurance all paid. I told my buddy hey I’m 54. You guys aren’t worried about us old geezers going to the doctor more often? He says of course not.

Dental all paid.

So my current health insurance is $350 a month. Dental $60 a month. Figure $5,000. No vacation. $3800 I would otherwise pay. Then the 401k matching of 2500. Then there is profit sharing and bonuses which I cannot calculate.

then the more potential of secure job so I can find a 12 month lease of apartment somewhere decent with good apartment ratings reviews.

No tax benefit but mine goes away after a year (Per diem).

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2013-06-29 07:09:01

I will be paying double rent for a few years still. I do not want to give up on my Arizona address since it’s where I keep my firearms that are illegal in Cali and its my legal address for my CCW. It is $1000 per month plus utilities. Ouch. Prefer one address on a direct hire job. And my rent in SOuthern Cal is more.

My CEO buddy is okay with that. I told him. I am not one to hide that I have one foot out the door. He is very eager to snag me from the current former client, he has others from the client too. I think it’s partly revenge and partly to build up the skill base of his company for the type of work the former client does. It’s a statement when the highest skilled people from the former client are taken. A “WTF” is the management thinking by getting rid of the engine of their profits?

 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post