July 1, 2013

Speculation And Blind Investment In The Anti-Bubble

Some housing bubble news from around the globe. Fund Web, “A senior Bank of England official has refuted criticism that quantitative easing has created fresh asset bubbles in the world’s financial markets. External Monetary Policy Committee member David Miles argued that the Bank’s QE programme has helped to stop an ‘anti-bubble’ - or a downward spiral in asset prices - rather than artificially propping up markets. ‘There is a world of difference between supporting asset prices so as to prevent a self-reinforcing downward spiral in values and creating a bubble,’ he said. ‘Indeed preventing a downward spiral – because it stabilises both asset prices and the wider economy – is pretty much the opposite of blowing up a financial market bubble.’”

The Business Standard on India. “If you travel on the road to Noida and Greater Noida, you will find a large number of banners and hoardings of new residential real estate projects on both sides of the road. The moment you get close to construction sites, salesmen of property dealers descend on you like a horde of bees. Start talking to them and you will be offered discounts of up to 9 per cent on the published price straightaway. So are they desperate to sell their flats? Is this the first sign that the real estate bubble is all set to burst?”

“The pile-up of unsold inventory surely points towards that. The numbers have almost doubled in the last three years. In spite of this, prices are on the rise. ‘The residential sector is immune to economic conditions as it is driven less by demand and supply and more by the excess cash in the economy,’ says Aniruddh Wahal, managing director of real estate consultant DTZ India. ‘Hence, there is no real bubble in the realty sector. As long as cash is pumped into the realty sector, the developers will sustain this period of low liquidity and not resort to price cuts as their target audience is investors and not the end users.’”

The News on Pakistan. “Property prices have shot up in the twin cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi – as the law and order situation continues to force residents to go there from other parts of the country. This is particularly true of Karachi – which has seen a massive influx to the twin cities and also to Dubai. ‘The prices have doubled in Islamabad and its adjacent areas,’ said Malik Zulfiqar a real estate dealer at Hussain Builders and Properties in Islamabad.”

The Daily Nation on Kenya. “Kisumu is set to be the economic hub of western Kenya, thanks in part to thriving property development in the city. According to Mr Aban Eban, the managing agent at Tom and Company Agencies, the region around the airport was a ghost town after 7pm but real estate development and lighting along the road has encouraged development. ‘Areas adjacent to the airport were bought by investors when they got wind that the airport would be developed. They are now selling at triple the price,’ Mr Eban said. He sold his quarter-acre to an investor for Sh5 million last year and today it is valued at Sh20 million.”

“Mr Wycliffe Abok, the operations manager at Kisumu Real Estate, has also come up with gated land parcels for affordable prices. ‘This will ensure that no resident is left out of the investment rush. Plots measuring 0.02 of a hectare are now available for between Sh65,000 and Sh250,000, depending on the location,’ Mr Abok said.”

Construction Week on Doha. “The market for apartments and villas in Doha is likely to ‘experience strong demand over the short to medium term,’ according to property consultancy Colliers. The report added that although average property sale prices have dropped by 38% since the market peak in 2008 to $3,341 (QR: 12,167) per m2 and rental prices have dropped by 27% to $175 (QR: 639) per m2 in the same period. Despite this, sales and rental rates both grew marginally over the past 12 months.”

“Current occupancy levels in Doha hover at around 85%, although in prime areas like West Bay and the Pearl this has reached 90%. ‘However, the 10% vacancy cannot be regarded as an oversupply situation, but instead a ‘floating’ vacancy rate, seen predominantly in newer developments,’ Colliers stated in its report. ‘A flight to quality is also being observed as tenants are taking advantage of competitive rentals offered by landlords, and are moving into better quality units.’”

The Standard on China. “Tight liquidity in the mainland is helping to temper land prices and may be deterring developers from acquiring more sites. A commercial plot in a Beijing suburb attracted just three tender bids yesterday at prices much lower than a similar site in the same area sold in April. The offered prices ranged between 1.3 billion yuan (HK$1.63 billion) and 1.45 billion yuan, People’s Daily reported. With a total gross floor area of 105,400 square meters, that comes to 13,757 yuan per square meter based on the highest price. In April, a similar site in the area was sold for 21,300 yuan psm.”

From China Daily. “Wide-ranging credit tightening by Chinese commercial banks is likely to spill over into the property market, and analysts said small and medium-sized developers may cut prices later this year as cash gets scarce. Zhang Hongwei, research director of Shanghai-based property consultancy ToSpur, warned that developers who poured a lot of capital into stockpiling land in the first half may be hit hard. ‘The most effective way to claw back capital is to mark down prices at property projects,’ said Zhang.

“Hui Jianqiang, research director of Beijing Zhongfang-yanxie Technology Service Ltd., said the spike in housing prices has outpaced the growth of GDP over several years, and it’s time for ‘a correction’ of the housing market boom, which is still being fueled by speculation and blind investment.”

Singapore Business Review. “According to Colliers International, the Singapore property auction market was relatively quiet in 2Q 2013, with both sale volume and value paling in comparison to that recorded in 1Q 2013. The total sale value of S$7.05 million in 2Q 2013 reflected a 91.6 per cent plummet from the S$83.44 million recorded in 1Q 2013. Only 4 properties were sold in 2Q 2013.”

“Ms Grace Ng, Deputy Managing Director of Colliers International, says, ‘Subdued market activity was further perpetuated by the persistent stalemate between buyers and sellers. While owners are holding on to their property, waiting for an offer that meets their price expectation, home buyers who now have to fork out larger cash outlay – due to the increase in ABSD, higher cash down payment and lower loan-to-value ratios – may take a more discretionary view of home buying. Coupled with the threat of a possible increase in interest rates, some buyers have also adopted a wait-and-see attitude in anticipation of a possible price fall.’”

“Together with concerns on the significant supply of residential units in the pipeline – with some 110,000 public home units and 90,000 private home units including executive condominiums slated for completion by 2016, buying interest in the private residential market could also be impacted.”

The Courier Mail on Australia. “Property sellers who didn’t hold onto their homes for long enough, took a $463 million bath during the March quarter selling their homes for less than they originally paid for them. RP Data national research director Tim Lawless said the likelihood of whether a property sale was at a profit or loss was often affected by how long it had been owned for. Only 8 per cent of properties bought before January 1, 2008 and sold in the March 2013 quarter were sold at a loss. Homes bought on or after that date were more likely to sell at a loss.”

“‘The weakness in Queensland is mostly reflective of the conditions across the lifestyle markets such as the Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast and Far North where the correction in home values has been more significant,’ Mr Lawless said.”

The Christian Science Monitor on Mexico. “When Jorge and María Arzave moved their family into a two-room house on the outskirts of Mexico City, they were elated. But today, their dream home has a ‘high risk’ sign posted over the front door, courtesy of a state civil protection agency. The house is barely 10 years old and it’s breaking apart. Poor and faced with indifference by the government and developers, some have simply abandoned their homes. Arzave says he holds keys to the homes of five neighbors who have left the troubled development.”

“The number of vacant homes soared, going from 2.4 percent of housing in 2005 to nearly 14 percent in 2010, according to census data. Some 5 million homes were classified as abandoned across the country in 2010, according to the latest census, with many buyers wondering if continuing to pay for them was worth the pride of ownership. And some of the homebuilders that benefited from the low-income housing boom are now facing cancelled credit lines and lawsuits by their lenders.”

“Infonavit, created in 1972 and one of a handful of state-backed housing lenders, is arguably the most important player in Mexico’s housing finance system, says Paavo Monkkonen, assistant professor of urban planning at UCLA’s Luskin School of Public Affairs. ‘It’s a good deal, especially in a country where interest rates are so high,’ says Mr. Monkkonen. ‘But I think a lot of people got loans to buy a house they didn’t really want. Even when governments want to put money into housing finance, it’s hard to get developers to build houses that are affordable.’”

“In Arzave’s home, piles of documentation sit on his double bed, which takes up most of the front room. Despite the hurdles, he hasn’t given up his fight, he says. He wants the government to move his family to a new home, one that isn’t sinking. ‘They told us they were giving us a life of dignity,’ he says. ‘The reality is another.’”




RSS feed

39 Comments »

Comment by Blue Skye
2013-07-01 06:10:37

“The number of vacant homes soared, going from 2.4 percent of housing in 2005 to nearly 14 percent in 2010…”

We’ve exported the American Dream.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 06:20:26

‘Mexico’s homebuilders are on shaky foundations: They have amassed more than $2.2 billion in debts, their share prices have sunk and more than 100,000 homes are sitting empty. Last month, the nation’s second and third largest homebuilders, Urbi, and Geo, defaulted on interest payments. Then on June 11, it was the industry leader’s turn, Homex, to fail to honor a debt payment.’

‘Their debt troubles reverberated in the stock market, with the shares of Homex falling by 70 percent by mid-June while Urbi’s stock tumbled by 74 percent and Geo lost 68 percent.’

“As a result of aggressive financial policies, major homebuilders in Mexico are taking a beating while demand for new housing has plunged to half of what it was in 2008,” the international ratings agency Standard & Poor’s said in a report this month. “Their inability to purge inventories and surpass significant hurdles in refinancing has resulted in collapsing operations and financial distress,” the agency said.’

‘Chinese steelmakers are dealing with a substantial oversupply problem that will likely force them to transform the way they do business. Figures from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that steel output increased by 11.3 percent year on year to 91.19 million tonnes in May. In the first five months of the year, steel product output rose 10.8 percent year on year to reach 426.16 million tonnes.’

‘Meanwhile, the Complex Steel Price Index (CSPI) released by CISA dropped by 13.35 percent year on year to hit 101.83 by the end of May, down 3.71 percent from that of April.’

‘The industry profit frate was only 0.23 percent in the first four months and 40 percent of large and medium-sized steel businesses suffered operational losses, according to CISA.’

‘Kasikornbank is warning local exporters, particularly small and medium-sized entrepreneurs, to exercise caution before extending credit to Chinese trading firms in the wake of that country’s economic slowdown.’

‘Executive vice-president Songpol Chevapanyaroj said Chinese importers in some sectors such as agriculture are requesting their trading partners allow them to stretch out payments to 1-3 months instead.’

‘Separately, Thiti Tantikulanan, the executive chairman of Kasikorn Securities, said his company has raised this year’s baht forecast to 30 to the US dollar from 28.50 after the US Federal Reserve issued a time frame for phasing out its asset-buying programme.’

‘Effects from China’s economic slowdown are escalating around the world, so it will be impossible for us not to feel any pinch,” said Mr Thiti.’

‘Home prices must not fall by more than 22%, because that would cause an economic crisis,’ new Ministry of Housing and Construction director general Shlomo Ben-Eliahu said at the Israel Builders Association’s annual conference in Eilat. He unveiled the ministry’s plan to lower housing prices.’

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-07-01 18:42:18

This growth-oriented central banking policy is working miracles all over the planet!

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-07-01 06:47:01

Rental Rates Sink 15% In Trendy Los Angeles County Community

http://picpaste.com/pics/77c7a063bd59e9bcf30c0fda7f0a9158.1372253292.png

 
Comment by 2banana
2013-07-01 06:47:22

Yep - that is the ONLY reason.

The Courier Mail on Australia. “Property sellers who didn’t hold onto their homes for long enough, took a $463 million bath during the March quarter selling their homes for less than they originally paid for them.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-07-01 06:47:33

Why? Unless you hear gunshots at night most people would love a 10-20% reduction in rent…

‘A flight to quality is also being observed as tenants are taking advantage of competitive rentals offered by landlords, and are moving into better quality units.’”

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 06:47:58

A headline at yahoo:

‘As Fed Masters Clarify Their Stance, Wall St. Falls Slave to the News’

Masters?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-07-01 06:52:01

Freudian.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-07-01 06:49:44
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 07:27:34

‘Monetary Policy Committee member David Miles argued that the Bank’s QE programme has helped to stop an ‘anti-bubble’ - or a downward spiral in asset prices - rather than artificially propping up markets. ‘There is a world of difference between supporting asset prices so as to prevent a self-reinforcing downward spiral in values and creating a bubble,’ he said. ‘Indeed preventing a downward spiral – because it stabilises both asset prices and the wider economy – is pretty much the opposite of blowing up a financial market bubble.’

‘preventing a downward spiral…is pretty much the opposite of blowing up a financial market bubble’

I was thinking about this earlier; we don’t even expect the government or central bankers to tell the truth. We fully expect that they lie and deceive. We even convince ourselves, or let them convince us, that they are actually doing it for our own good. Why, we should thank them for lying to us every day, even if they make our lives worse, and use our own money to do so.

Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-07-01 08:09:03

At least they are ‘honest’ in that they don’t expect the free market to work, at least not in favor of the people who currently have all the money.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-07-01 11:29:30

It is part of the mania. We don’t want the truth. We can’t handle the truth.

Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 11:40:20

This is shocking stuff:

‘There is a world of difference between supporting asset prices so as to prevent a self-reinforcing downward spiral in values and creating a bubble’

What part of this isn’t a bubble? The flipping, or dozens of offers over asking? The double digit price increases month after month? And if it isn’t a bubble, you can stop now, right?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-07-01 11:48:14

The incentivization of certain behaviors to accomplish their desired result doesn’t seem to be working. So they incentivize more. The size and scope of the rebound from this over-incentivization is going to be powerful and uncontrollable and they know it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2013-07-01 13:13:30

Ben, the part that’s not a bubble is that it doesn’t appear to be a bailout magnet. Cash offers don’t default on the mortage because there isn’t a mortgage. People who do buy with a mortgage are putting at least a little cash down and proving income. I have seen no risky products like I/O, neg-ams, cash-out refis, ARM resets. No hot news about cramdowns either.

So you can call it a bubble if you want, but it doesn’t really matter to the taxpayer (hopefully).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 16:33:22

‘you can call it a bubble if you want, but it doesn’t really matter to the taxpayer’

It doesn’t matter what I call it. What matters is what it is. If I’m right, this is going to be worse than 2008. Maybe by multiples. As I’ve said, this is the happy phase. People are making money, the mood is reported as cheerful, even ecstatic. When it turns, millions will lose jobs, be foreclosed, stocks will crash, companies will fold, more cities and maybe states will be bankrupt. I don’t expect many people to pay attention during the happy phase. I do expect the vast majority will be hit without any warning, because they are complacent.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-07-01 17:34:02

Ben, what money is being made? Yes, there are some investors and some ROI, but there certainly isn’t the frenzy of boats and boob jobs. Flippers might be selling, but the volume feels low. Where are the trillions in default swaps? How can you do a swap on defaulted credit if the house wasn’t bought on credit?

I don’t disbelieve that there will be a crash, but IMO it won’t be a result of this little bubblet. It will be the final collapse of the 1980-2010 economy, which is about when the economy became based on manipulation rather than goods and services.

 
Comment by DaniW
2013-07-01 17:43:19

“Cash offers don’t default on the mortage because there isn’t a mortgage. ”

It matters if what the person is doing is paying cash then getting a home equity mortgage on the value of the house (maybe inflated because they overpaid) and then the person is turning around with that cash and buying another house - rinse, repeat. (check out the biggerpockets website and you can read more about how this scheme is played out)

It all works as long as there is income coming in - either the first houses are being flipped or they are being rented, but if anything happens - a couple houses sit on the market or can’t be rented or there is a medical emergency a whole chain of houses go into foreclosure, not just one.

If the hedge funds are doing this - leveraging their initial purchases in order to buy more and or making their balance sheets look better than they are in order to get more investors, it could all come crashing down at once.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 18:22:33

We haven’t dealt with what’s already been defaulted on.

‘Well over a million U.S. homeowners are months behind on payments on government-backed mortgages, raising the risk federal housing agencies will end up facing the cost of managing a fresh flood of foreclosed homes, two government watchdogs said on Thursday. Some 1.7 million borrowers have missed several payments on mortgages backed by the U.S. government, the inspectors general of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Department of Housing and Urban Development said in a joint report.’

‘Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration are backing about nine out of every ten new home loans. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac owned about 158,000 REO properties at the end of September 2012, while HUD had about 37,000.’

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-housing-idUSBRE94T10V20130531

Then there’s all the borrowers underwater but current. And this:

‘Thu Apr 26, 2012 (Reuters) - More than 1 million Americans who have taken out mortgages in the past two years now owe more on their loans than their homes are worth, and Federal Housing Administration loans that require only a tiny down payment are partly to blame.’

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/26/us-usa-housing-negative-idUSBRE83P12E20120426

Look at the number of countries I have above and in other international posts. There has never been anything like this in history. And it’s telling to me that more and more, these international reports are about falling prices. Here’s one I just found from New Zealand last January:

”Property prices are surging,” shouted the headline, but tell that to Gary of Tauranga. Gary, who asked that his surname be kept private, rang in one day to complain about that very headline. Prices were certainly not surging where he was. The local economy, heavily dependent on the kiwifruit industry, was faring badly from the impact of the Psa virus. Coastal properties near his house had been selling at huge discounts. Nearby houses previously valued at $3.4 million had started to sell for $2.2m. “It just shows you, no-one’s got any money,” he said.’

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/8860290/Homes-fly-higher-out-of-reach

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-07-01 18:55:24

“Some 1.7 million borrowers have missed several payments on mortgages backed by the U.S. government, the inspectors general of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Department of Housing and Urban Development said in a joint report.”

Say the average value of these homes is around $250,000. In that case, we are talking about roughly $425 billion in taxpayer guarantees at risk of getting tapped to cover defaults that have already taken place.

Is this what Oxide was talking about when she said there is no longer any bailout risk?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-07-01 19:09:10

‘roughly $425 billion in taxpayer guarantees at risk’

I’d say it’s much higher.

‘The U.S. government says it has received $66.3 billion in dividend payments from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, reflecting stronger earnings at the start of the year. Treasury officials say Fannie Mae on Friday paid $59.4 billion and Freddie Mac paid $7 billion.’

‘Fannie has now repaid $95 billion of the roughly $116 billion it received during the crisis, while Freddie has repaid roughly $37 billion of the $71.3 billion it received.’

http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2013/07/fannie_and_freddie_make_663_bi.html

Yet we have senators trying to shut these corporations down right now. Why, when they have already paid back almost everything the govt. paid? I’ll suggest this; the $190 billion was a drop in the bucket on what these corporations have lost/will lose. Again, how do two companies with $5 trillion in assets fail over $190 billion? They don’t. We are being lied to. And if these companies were able to generate this income legitimately, there would be no attempt to shut them down.

 
Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy
2013-07-02 03:59:56

I’m late to the party again and my crystal ball is in the shop, but here is my opinion. Firstly, Bubble 2.0 and another bailout are two completely different and separate events. One does not automatically follow the other and this time, I don’t think it will. Ben mentioned how widespread and fast this could happen and I think it will, especially here in the US. Ask yourself, ‘How much popular support (think youtube, twitter, street protests) will Obama have to bail out rich, old, white-guy fat-cats who gambled to drive up house prices and lost some of their cash?’

From a few days ago:

“Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy

2013-06-26 12:14:23

What about everything paid for in cash- no mortgages? No leveraged liability that risks bringing down the financial system in this bubble. I don’t think there will be a bailout this time, but there WILL be scapegoats. When prices start circling the bowl this time, Obama will paint himself as Robin Hood, defender of the poor and downtrodden. Since there will be no massive, public outcry for a bailout of rich people (quite the opposite) and no votes to be gleaned by saving them, Obama will just wring his hands and wish them the best of luck. Since there is no systemic risk, no political gain but huge political risk in any bailout attempt, Obama will sacrifice them upon the altar of political expediency. Because there are no potential ‘innocents’ (votes) this time. Just a whole lot of ‘hedge fund fat-cats’ and ‘evil speculators’ who have been ‘beating-down the common man’ with their huge bags of cash. He will say that ‘they just made a bad bet’ and there is ‘a price to be paid for poor investments- this is capitalism, after all’. And the crowd will love him for it. And RE prices will collapse.

Reply to this comment

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained

2013-06-26 20:31:05

Since there is no systemic risk,

What has changed that makes you believe that there is no systemic risk this time around?

Too big to fail has only been biggering, and biggering, and biggering…
(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy

2013-06-27 04:11:10

Correct. There is still the same old systemic risk that there has been for previously sold houses purchased with MORTGAGES, but Bubble 2.0 is primarily hot-money CASH. Credit is unlimited supply and infinite risk, cash/wealth is in finite supply and has limited risk. If I buy a house with $100,000 cash and its value goes to $0.00, then there is only one loser (me) and the most I can lose is $100,000. If I use a mortgage to make payments on a $100,000 and its value goes to zero, then there are multiple potential losers involved in this single transaction (me, the bank, the taxpayers, the PMI insurance company, MBS buyers and every downstream derivative thereof, etc) and the actual amount of loss is unknowable, but well in excess of the face value of the loan plus its interest rate.”

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-07-02 09:35:20

“Again, how do two companies with $5 trillion in assets fail over $190 billion?”

Leverage.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-07-02 23:15:53

Leverage.

Another common way: solvent but illiquid.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2013-07-02 23:17:21

but Bubble 2.0 is primarily hot-money CASH.

False. The vast majority of buyers are still buying with mortgages—roughly the same number of mortgaged-buyers are in 1997.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-07-01 07:48:56

Housing Prices Crater 11% In Exclusive Los Angeles Neighborhoods

http://picpaste.com/pics/15b0288c9a4ed6710dfd98adbfae729c.1372250662.png

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-07-01 08:21:00

“Speculation And Blind Investment In The Anti-Bubble”

Technically isn’t it a ‘Post-Bubble’ (i.e. ‘Anti’ = ‘before’, ‘Post’ = ‘after’)

Comment by oxide
2013-07-01 09:13:01

Ante is before. Anti is against. I guess the closest term to the context in the article is “black hole.”

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-07-01 14:28:57

Oops, somehow I missed that you had already wrote that. Just ignore me, I’m dottering.

 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-07-01 14:26:13

Ante = Before

Anti = Against

 
 
Comment by oxide
2013-07-01 09:09:36

Plots measuring 0.02 of a hectare are now available for between Sh65,000 and Sh250,000.

0.02 hectare = 0.05 acre
Sh65,000 = $756 (google finance as of today)
per capita income = $798 (UN data 2010)

A year’s salary for an empty plot which is 1/4 the size of my property. And that’s the cheapest.

 
Comment by oxide
2013-07-01 09:18:10

Start talking to them and you will be offered discounts of up to 9 per cent on the published price straightaway. So are they desperate to sell their flats?

Or they could just be haggling like any street market?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-07-01 10:24:50

“Housing’s ‘Shadow Inventory’ Still Haunts Banks”

According to the National Association of Realtors, only 15 to 20 percent of the homes that were foreclosed on during the downturn were making their way to the market in 2008 and 2009. The remaining 80 to 85 percent of the homes were bought back at foreclosure and are now owned by the banks. One might ask why the banks would want to own these properties. The answer is both telling and very scary.

http://news.yahoo.com/housings-shadow-inventory-still-haunts-banks-152949909.html

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-07-01 18:58:28

“One might ask why the banks would want to own these properties. The answer is both telling and very scary.”

Stupid is as stupid does.

– Forrest Gump

 
 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-07-01 11:51:00

“A senior Bank of England official has refuted criticism that quantitative easing has created fresh asset bubbles in the world’s financial markets.”

Hmmm, that’s odd. I wonder where all those bubbles are actually coming from then?

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-07-01 11:53:22

“The residential sector is immune …”

Thank you sir, that’s all I need to know.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2013-07-01 12:03:02

“‘However, the 10% vacancy cannot be regarded as an oversupply situation, but instead a ‘floating’ vacancy rate …”

wat

 
Comment by non-conformist
2013-07-07 13:07:01

+12

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post