Detroit — Wayne County treasurer officials are foreclosing on thousands of properties from tax scofflaws, only to sell them to buyers who don’t pay taxes either, newly released records show.
Nearly 80 percent of 18,568 properties bought at the treasurer’s controversial foreclosure auctions in the last two years are now delinquent on taxes, according to county records from this month. One recent study found the bankrupt city of Detroit alone is owed about $70 million in taxes from the properties.
The situation frustrates critics who have been pushing for an overhaul of the annual online auction, which ends its first round this week. They argue the auction breeds a vicious cycle: Speculators buy properties for as little as $500 apiece, sit on them or milk houses for rental cash for three years without paying taxes until they are foreclosed on again.
Many of the bulk buyers The News examined from the last two auctions were tax delinquents, including 117 properties purchased in 2011 by attorney Robert Vanderwoude and put in the name of Detroit resident Bernice Pinkston-Carpenter.
All but one of the 117 properties is behind on taxes, for nearly $625,000 as of earlier this month. The average auction sale price for the properties was $650.
Wayne county can seize the land under a clause the treasurer added to deeds in 2011 and 2012 that requires buyers stay current on taxes or risk losing properties. The reform was added after a series of stories in The Detroit News about buyers who buy back their own foreclosed properties.
“We don’t want to sell properties to people who aren’t going to pay taxes,” Chief Deputy Treasurer David Szymanski said. “We are trying to break that cycle.”
But his office doesn’t have a plan on what to do with the land it takes back. Szymanski said he would hope to work with the state or city land banks to sell the properties to buyers who have proven to be more responsible.
A separate group wants Detroit Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr to step in.
A proposal being pitched by a coalition of community groups and backed by the Michigan Legislative Black Caucus, called Project 99, would have the city seize the properties now through a nonprofit and sell them to buyers deemed responsible. The plan would take only properties owned by investors, not owner-occupied ones.
How high can the taxes be on a $500 house?!?!
WHATEVER the assessing/tax authority decides. If the homeowner doesn’t like it he can (1) decline to pay tax (2) appeal through tax authority or through the courts, depending on local laws. I am not aware of alternatives.
i posted several links filled with data last week in response to 2ban’s posts on this topic.
and reminded the hbb that the real welfare queens are the government contractors that cost taxpayers 500,000,000,000+ dollars a year.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-09-23 12:20:34
Something like 80% of the highest food stamp counties went for Romney in ‘12. It’s really mind blowing when you remember that Mitt only got 200 electoral votes.
In addition to the contractors you mention, also remember that Medicare and SS are dominated by the 65+ set, which is the only age demographic that McCain and Romney won.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 12:29:45
So the GOP is the party whose members are most attached to the government teat.
Comment by tj
2013-09-23 14:12:22
So the GOP is the party whose members are most attached to the government teat.
nope. but they have the biggest percentage of liberals that claim to be conservative, otherwise known as ‘establishment republicans’ or ‘rinos’.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 14:21:52
they have the biggest percentage of liberals that claim to be conservative, otherwise known as ‘establishment republicans’ or ‘rinos’.
Then the true GOP is a very small party, no? Representative of very few.
Comment by tj
2013-09-23 14:47:52
Then the true GOP is a very small party, no? Representative of very few.
This is just untrue and you know it. I posted about his false stat last week. The fact that you need to keep pushing a false stat makes me wonder why. Concerned about the implications ?
The top 10 most populous counties are:
LA, CA –Obama, population: 9.9 million
Cook County, Ill – Obama, population: 5.2 million
Harris, TX – Obama, population: 4.2 million
Maricopa, AZ – Romney, population: 3.9 million
San Diego, CA – Obama, population: 3.1 million
Orange County, CA – Romney, population: 3.1 million
Miami-Dade, FLA – Obama, population: 2.5 million
King County, NY – Obama, population: 2.5 million
Dallas, TX – Obama, population: 2.4 million
Queens County, NY – Obama, population: 2.2 million
These amount to 39 million people. 80% of those top 10 counties went for Obama. 2 counties with 7 million for Romney. 8 Counties with 32 million for Obama.
Guess what you see in the next 10 most populous? Same thing.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by maldonash
2013-09-23 19:49:11
Correct, not only wealthiest also most populous regions.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 20:27:25
“The Bloomberg review of 2,049 counties where the data was available included the 250 with the highest concentration of food stamp recipients. Among that group, 227 are wholly within one congressional district, with 160 represented by Republicans and 67 by Democrats. ”
Bloomberg
Your base is on SNAP, GOPsters.
Now you know!
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-09-23 21:09:13
Alpha you are a partisan hack. I googled your quote and you clearly aren’t reading the article or are deliberately misrepresenting. This does NOT say anything about populations of those counties. There could be 5 or more low population rural counties in a single district. It is a gamed stat deliberately designed for a hit piece. The county they use for an example, Owlsley County, KY , has a population of 4,722 people according to the article. Yeah, compare that to LA or Cook County where there are 14 million people total. Quit peddling the lie.
“Wayne county can seize the land under a clause the treasurer added to deeds in 2011 and 2012 that requires buyers stay current on taxes or risk losing properties.”
You would think that a home owner should know better.
Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr’s bid to untangle a complicated debt transaction blamed as one of the underpinnings of Detroit’s plunge into bankruptcy could set the stage for the rest of his plan to rescue the city from crippling debt.
His proposal to pay UBS AG and Bank of America at least $250 million to terminate an interest rate swap arrangement that went bad for the city during the recession is opposed by insurers of the debt who stand to lose millions of dollars and retirees owed billions of dollars in promised retirement benefits.
Some legal and financial experts also question why Orr is trying to settle with the two big banks so quickly in the bankruptcy process.
“He gave the banks a big, wet sloppy kiss,” said Michael Greenberger, a financial derivatives expert at the University of Maryland law school. “Why should the banks get 75 to 82 cents on the dollar, but the Detroit workers get 10 cents on the dollar? Whose life is destroyed by this?”
A committee of retirees also is urging U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes to reject the settlement, which will be litigated over three days of hearings set to begin Tuesday.
“Once (the banks) take this money, that’s money that’s not available to satisfy the claims of the other claimants,” said Peter Shapiro, a South Orange, N.J., financial consultant who advises cities and states on interest rate swaps.
Orr has said he has no choice but to pay UBS and Bank of America a large chunk of what they’re owed because the banks control access to $15 million a month in casino tax revenues through another deal that staved off bankruptcy for the Motor City in 2009.
“The city needs the casino revenue badly,” Orr said last month in a sworn deposition. “Every day that we don’t have access to casino revenue, we cannot make the necessary reinvestment in this city to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens.”
…
In 2006, city leaders agreed to a fixed 6.3 percent interest rate on $800 million borrowed to pour into the pension funds. As part of the deal, the banks dangled what seemed to city leaders like a lucrative advantage: The banks would pay Detroit the difference between variable interest rates and the city’s fixed rate.
Based on rates at the time, the deal made the actual monthly payment for taxpayers less than 1 percent, city records show.
The deal was hailed by Wall Street insiders for its creativity in financing part of the $1.44 billion that former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick borrowed in 2005 and 2006 to fund pensions. It also appeared to lower costs for Detroit’s beleagured general fund.
City leaders effectively bet that variable interest rates would remain high, which would keep the costs to Detroit low — but the opposite occurred.
The city’s situation got worse in 2009 when Wall Street rating agencies downgraded Detroit’s credit rating to junk status, triggering a default on the swaps and the threat of an immediate $400 million termination payment that could have sent the city into bankruptcy, Harris said.
Harris, working under interim Mayor Ken Cockrel Jr. at the time, negotiated a deal with UBS and a Bank of America subsidiary to pledge the city’s $15 million in monthly casino taxes as collateral to keep the swaps arrangement in place — and avoid the potentially lethal termination fee.
“There was no question in anybody’s mind, because the city couldn’t come up with the $400 million, that bankruptcy was right around the corner,” he said.
“His proposal to pay UBS AG and Bank of America at least $250 million to terminate an interest rate swap arrangement that went bad for the city during the recession is opposed by insurers of the debt who stand to lose millions of dollars and retirees owed billions of dollars in promised retirement benefits.”
Didn’t Larry Summers lose Harvard University a lot of money with an interest rate swap arrangement that went bad?
Anyone who does not believe that these guys are all in cahoots with one another, that Wall Street runs Washington and that we are not even pawns in their chess game needs to check out “House of Cards” on Netflix. After watching the first season, rational ignorance looks pretty darn rational!
Emigration as a family is another draw - U.S. citizens may apply for Green Cards for their parents when they turn 21.
While there is no data on the total number of Chinese who have sought or used U.S. surrogates, agencies in both countries say demand has risen rapidly in the last two years.
U.S. fertility clinics and surrogacy agencies are creating Chinese-language websites and hiring Mandarin speakers.
The Federal Reserve has been creating a bunch of money since the 90’s and vast amounts in the last few years. Does it take a decade or two for inflation to show up? Or do we just get bubbles?
——————————————————————————–
What exactly am I supposed to be looking for to “show up?”
I know what the signs of poison ivy are, but how do I know when Im experiencing “inflation?”
When you drive by the gas station in the morning at $3.50 and when you drive by on the home in the evening the price is $3.69?
Actually, everyone thinks of inflation as from the 1970s. Prices going up quickly but wages going up almost as quickly. And with high interest rates.
With globalism we now have prices going quickly for things you need to survive (housing, food, medical care, education, etc.) but this is coupled with declining wages. With ZIRP there is 0% interest rates (for the connected).
This is a new type of inflation for America.
You can see how it ends by reading of life in North Korea. For some reason, I have read a few books on it recently.
An all powerful government telling you life is great and there is no inflation yet your pay can not even buy the basic foods (if they are even available). The government and the rich (all connected to government) live just fine. If you want to eat - you can sell your cloths/furniture/pot/pans/etc. Complaining is punishable by death or long prison terms for you and your entire extended family (and three generation of those yet to born). Escape is punishable by death.
“Actually, everyone thinks of inflation as from the 1970s. Prices going up quickly but wages going up almost as quickly. And with high interest rates.”
IIRC, wages didn’t grow with prices; stagflation became the new meme.
‘…how do I know when Im experiencing “inflation?”’
1) You notice it costs twice as much to fill your gas tank as it did just a few years ago.
2) You notice that you either come home from the grocery store with a half-full shopping cart or else you pay twice as much for a full cart compared with just a few years ago.
Perhaps you would have to jump into the sewer that all this supposed money flows through to get a personal experience of it. Not likely you will since you are making a living off the deflation that many are having a personal experience with.
For those of you who enjoy freezing in the dark in your house.
Obama’s is just keeping his campaign promises.
He promised to ruin the coal industry.
He promised to raise taxes.
He promised to ruin health care.
If your electric costs double - how many more jobs lost?
How many more homeowners forced into bankruptcy?
——————–
New carbon emission rules will devastate the coal industry
American Thinker | 9-21-2013 | Rick Moran
The UN’s climate change panel is set to release a report next month that reluctantly concludes there has been no warming of the earth in at least the last 15 years. Fewer and fewer people are believers that climate change is man made.
This hasn’t stopped the Obama administration from releasing new rules governing “carbon pollution” at new power plants that would mean the virtual destruction of the coal industry.
We paid $0.14/kw-hr for “below baseline rates” electric power in coastal California back in the mid-nineties. I don’t recall what the baseline power limit was or what the prices were over baseline, but it was really expensive. We usually rented 50’s homes, which were not energy efficient. Sweat pants and shirt were our evening attire during the brief wet winters.
Dang! I pay about 8 cents/kwh, and no baseline either. And Colorado generates 10%+ of its juice from windmills, and that’s expected to grow to 20%+ in a few more years.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-09-23 11:13:19
my highest electric bill this year was $55
Comment by rms
2013-09-23 12:06:45
“I pay about 8 cents/kwh, and no baseline either.”
Near the Columbia River Hydro-Power Complex residential power is $0.0375/kw-hr, and our “all electric” spec house rarely exceeds the baseline except in the deepest of cold-snaps, which are below zero. We usually hover around 24-degrees F during the winter months.
You want to see why electric prices might go up just watch what happens when a $45 billion electric utility goes bankrupt. Google ‘Energy Futures Holdings’. When you look how greedy Wall St. crooks rigged this deal it was bound to collapse and the losses will be dumped on consumers and tax payers. Since this deal went down in 2007 you can’t blame Obama for this one. Natural gas is killing coal, cheap wind and solar is killing coal, technology is killing coal and yes the EPA is killing coal. Just remember the climate we have today is a result of 50 years of cumulative GHG emissions and despite years of cooler Pacific Ocean waters (La-Nina) global temperatures haven’t gone down. Next time the La-Nino cycle kicks in we might see a new world record.
So why is it cheaper in Colorado? We get the same “subsidies” as everyone else. And even without the subsidies, which are about 2 cents per kwh, we’re still cheaper than most places coal generated power.
Coal is 18th century technology that will struggle to keep a shrinking share of the US market. The only reason it’s still viable is it gets to avoid the external costs of it’s pollution. That’s changing both here and in China.
If wind and solar were more economical, there wouldn’t be coal, hydro, nuke or combined cycle gas plants.
Comment by tj
2013-09-23 14:20:30
If wind and solar were more economical, there wouldn’t be coal, hydro, nuke or combined cycle gas plants.
spot on.. again.
Comment by polly
2013-09-23 15:46:48
I assume you guys mean “IF wind and solar were more econmical, there wouldn’t be any coal, hydro, nuke or combined cyle gas plants IF you could find an economy where new power generation facilities could be created with no start up costs.”
I don’t see any places where the new facilities can be created at no cost, so your statement is useless.
Comment by tj
2013-09-23 16:19:45
IF you could find an economy where new power generation facilities could be created with no start up costs.
Polly, why would you assume that we’re talking about no start up costs? that would mean that they are still uneconomical. to be economic, they must overcome the included start up costs. in other words, if it were profitable, it would have been done.
efficiency is rising and prices are coming down in solar, so in the near future, solar might be a very good option for a lot of people. in some cases, it already is. but there is still a ways to go.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-09-23 17:54:07
Lying lawyers are funny when they detect they’re losing control.
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-09-23 19:55:29
“I don’t see any places where the new facilities can be created at no cost…”
On the contrary, we have had a decade of “build it for the government subsidy”. Facilities depreciate and are always being replaced. The most economical technology will be used, or the most subsidized.
“Coal is 18th century technology…”
Gasp!
I don’t think I’ve ever been in a coal fired electric plant built in the 1700s.
We know what green, sustainable, solar and wind powered societies look like. Colonial America, Medieval Europe, Incan Empire, Roman Empire, etc… This time with high tech for the 1%!!
It’s not that hard to understand why solar and wind are becoming more affordable. Last year I did the math and my benchmark was the 10 year (2% yield) bond vs. a 6 KW solar array over 25 years or my annual electric bill. I paid $24,000 (installed) for my array (no tax credits) and have generated 17.7 Megawatts and I have a $176 credit on my utility bill. Compare this to 2011 when my annual electric bill was over $2,600 (note 2011 was the hottest year on record in Texas so lets just say $2,0000 yr.). Just locking in my electric costs for 25 years seems like a better deal than trying to factor in the constant inflation in energy prices.
One more thing, one of these days I’m going to hook this thing up to some batteries and drop off the grid. That’s a kind of freedom very few people have and it’s worth something. Kind of like having a gun means you don’t have to depend on the police when trouble comes knocking at your door.
I think this is great. But do not believe modern wind and solar can scale to run society as set up today, especially without a fossil fuel based platform on which to be built.
I’ve been looking into going solar and one of the things I think I’ve learned is that solar power has a high upkeep (keeping the panels clean) and that they also degrade over time regardless of upkeep and lose their efficiency. I guess your solar panels are producing 6KW right now; any idea how many kilowatts they’re supposed to generate at year 15? 20? 25? As best I could tell, after factoring in degradation the solution wasn’t good enough and I decided to wait. Curious what your thoughts are, thanks.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bluestar
2013-09-23 12:31:37
My panels are ground mounted for optimum angle and cooling. I have cleaned them 4 time in 19 months and it takes about 20 min. and 50 gallons of water. If you can only mount them on a roof then they will be harder to clean, degrade faster because of the heat buildup and will need to be reinstalled when your roof needs replacing. You should wait till they get the efficiency up to 30% (mine are 15%). It will take 1/2 the space of current systems and will probably output AC directly instead of DC like mine. One more thing, the reason I have a credit on my electric bill is because I won a energy saver contest last year and added 3 extra panels so my current system is actually 6.7 KW now.
One last thought, avoid leasing. It’s a gimmick to turn Solar City into a unregulated utility. At some point they will package up the lease contracts and sell them off to Wall St. and stiff the customers when problems develop.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 12:48:26
If you can only mount them on a roof then they will be harder to clean, degrade faster because of the heat buildup and will need to be reinstalled when your roof needs replacing.
I’ve heard they prolong the life of your roof though, because they protect it from much of the elements, and keep it cooler by shading it.
So maybe it’s a wash? I was thinking of installing them on my garage roof, to power an electric car. Figured they’d be easier to service and clean on a low roof, and not take up yard space.
Comment by Bluestar
2013-09-23 13:20:24
It’s a tough call. The ideal solution would be to install a metal roof first and then you do get the benefit of the shade from the panels without the remove/replace hassles. I have that on my long term wish list when my roof plays out in another 10 years. A$$holes on the local zoning board changed the rules 3 months ago on roof top panels so they have to be mounted no more than 6″ above the roof and must match roof slope exactly, can’t be seen from the street and you have to have a 1 acre lot before they will let you do a new ground mount system. They love putting sand in the gears of progress. It’s funny in a way, they hate solar panels because they act like a symbol of anti-fossil fuel green/communist/left wing eco-Nazis. I see them as a symbol of freedom from energy monopolies. https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/pv/public_systems/3Fzt45951
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 13:48:40
The back of my garage faces south, so I could meet all those requirements you cite pretty easily. I suspect we have similar requirements here.
Yeah, it’s the kind of thing that makes you pay extra to live near your job.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-09-23 08:07:47
Because a 2×4 is triple the price depending on location right Slob?
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-09-23 09:22:11
Too funny. In my forty years of “jobs”, living close in was the cheapest option. People were paying more not to live in the decayed center. Of course I’ve worked in industry, which is nothing like living off of government.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 10:32:26
Because a 2×4 is triple the price depending on location right Slob?
If it keeps you from jumping off a bridge, then it should be rather valuable.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-09-23 10:46:35
Run slob Run!
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 10:59:34
Run slob Run!
Why should I run from the fact that you just refuted one of your major arguments- that location doesn’t matter?
Location is life or death for you!
Thanks for sharing honestly. It’s step one on the road to recovery.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-09-23 11:36:28
Keep running Slob. We expect nothing less from you.
Depends on the time of day and where in Silicon Valley you may be headed….The nightmare hours coming in are between 7:30-10:00…Going back from 3:30-7:00…
If you are commuting to lets say, central San Jose, you are coming from Manteca and your coming & going at the worst time its 2+ hours each way…Thats assuming no accidents…
If you can work around the bad hours somehow, its more like 1 hour..
Still brutal. I watched my dad commute for 45-60 minutes each way for 40 years…on bad days it would stretch to 1:30 or 2 hours. For a while he took the bus, sometimes he managed a vanpool from others who had the same commute.
Still a hassle, and a giant pain in the butt.
HOWEVER, that was a time when there was no such thing as the internet, and when he was home, he was not at work (with few exceptions).
And there is no way that my parents could have afforded to own 3 acres closer to where he worked.
Today, if you are talking about simply commuting to be able to own a home with similar characteristics as if you were renting close by, and despite the commute, you still can’t “shut it off” when you get home each day, I can’t say the commute is worth it to “own” your home…
Never mind about that, as HSBC sez that China’s industrial production index is back above 50.
Bloomberg News China Manufacturing Gauge Increases to Six-Month High By Bloomberg News September 23, 2013
Boeing Composites Tianjin Plant
An employee works on producing parts for Boeing Co. airplanes at the Boeing Composites Tianjin Co. Ltd. plant in Tianjin. Photographer: Nelson Ching/Bloomberg
A Chinese manufacturing index (SHCOMP) rose to a six-month high in September, signaling that a rebound in the world’s second-largest economy is gaining steam.
The preliminary reading of 51.2 for a Purchasing Managers’ Index released today by HSBC Holdings Plc and Markit Economics compared with a 50.9 median estimate from 14 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The gauge was at 50.1 in August. A euro-area manufacturing and services gauge rose more than estimated this month, a separate Markit report showed today.
…
Wall Street Journal - Foxconn Says 11 Injured in Large-Scale Fight at Chinese Campus:
“Foxconn Technology Co. said a large-scale fight that broke out last week at one of its campuses injured 11 people, the latest in a series of violent confrontations among the company’s workers that follows a summer of heightened unrest at Chinese factories.
The violence at the Foxconn plant followed a similar, though much larger-scale, fight last year at another facility in which a fight between two drunken workers escalated into unrest involving about 2,000 workers.”
“The workers, demonstrating for a third day, pelted factories with bricks and blocked a highway, Abdus Salam Murshedy, president of the Exporters Association of Bangladesh, said by phone. Television images showed police using tear gas on workers, some of whom set fire to a factory warehouse.
The protesters demanded a minimum monthly salary of 8,114 taka ($104), up from 3,000 taka now, Murshedy said as he headed into a meeting with government officials.”
Here’s a “victim” who used to make six figures but didn’t save enough for retirement. How many millions of baby boomers will follow this path?
“About 7.2 million Americans who were 65 and older were employed last year, a 67 percent increase from a decade ago, according to government data. Yet 59 percent of households headed by people 65 and older currently have no retirement account assets
Palome, He receives $1,200 from Social Security and a $600 a month pension from his last corporate job.
================================================
He’s 77. He had a pension through most of his career and it pays $600 a month. That’s only a little more than the median 401k pays ($4800 a year). Hope he enjoys water and rice.
Sometimes I like a little rice with my Ribeye steak. The taxes on my dock are only about $50/year.
You have to play to win they say. The reverse is more true.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 10:34:54
The taxes on my dock are only about $50/year.
Don’t you pay taxes on that house that you bought recently?
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-09-23 12:10:49
Sure. You remember that it is a cheap hobby studio? If I boasted about that as if it were my residence, it would still make my point about staying out of the game the majority are playing.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 12:32:31
it would still make my point about staying out of the game the majority are playing.
Dude, you bought. You bought at today’s absurdly high prices.
Prepare for losses from which you will never recover.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-09-23 17:52:32
Slob,
He paid $20/sq ft for it.
Comment by alpha-sloth
2013-09-23 20:35:00
He paid $20/sq ft for it.
Of course, he claims it’s just a shed. So maybe you’re right for once.
The subject of this story has a paid off house and paid his kids’ educations in full. That alone is a decent chunk of change especially if his kids went to better schools. I’d love to know what schools they went to and what their current income is. I hope they’re thankful for what their Dad and perhaps mother too has done and is still doing for them.
He struck me as very similar to my Dad who never really retired. I think not working would have killed him. He was self employed, a workaholic for his entire career, and always in perpetual motion. It took a surprise brain tumor to take him out at the tender age of 70. Doctors discovered it just weeks before he passed. It was the size of his fist. He wasn’t rolling in the dough at the end but I think he lived well and more importantly the way he wanted to.
He wasn’t rolling in the dough at the end but I think he lived well and more importantly the way he wanted to.
Sorry to hear that, CarrieAnne. On the other hand your father didn’t linger and cause the family a bunch of grief and palliative work, and he earned your respect.
So long as the housing market rally continues, why does this story matter one iota?
The Fed Archives
Sept. 23, 2013, 10:11 a.m. EDT Fed’s Lockhart, Dudley downbeat on outlook Economy may have lost ‘mojo,’ says Atlanta Fed president
By Greg Robb, MarketWatch
Reuters
Dennis Lockhart, who heads the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and is shown at right with his Chicago Fed counterpart, Charles Evans, suggests there is evidence that the U.S. economy has lost steam.
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Two senior Federal Reserve officials speaking Monday expressed disappointment with the pace of the U.S. recovery, with one, Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart, saying the economy may have lost dynamism.
“Is America losing its economic mojo?” Lockhart asked in a speech in New York to a summit on creative leadership sponsored by the Louise Blouin Foundation. “There is some evidence to the affirmative.”
…
Here is something “most” have agreed on for as long as I have been paying attention (well over a decade already!).
Watch for the phase-out of direct welfare payments to get offset by an increase in stealth welfare payments to farmers (e.g. subsidized crop insurance).
The farm bill which Congress is bitterly divided over is set to expire at the end of this month. Included in it is the $5 billion a year subsidy called Direct and Counter-cyclical Payment Program. It shells out money to farmers and land owners regardless of need or loss.
Paying politicians with a portion of the proceeds, to ensure they keep funneling public money to the donor, has been an excellent investment for Wall Street as well.
“Paying politicians with a portion of the proceeds, to ensure they keep funneling public money to the donor, has been an excellent investment for Wall Street as well.”
Remember when Obama promised that you could keep your doctor under Obamacare?
“With insurance marketplaces set to open next month under the new health care law, consumers may find that insurers have limited their options for doctors and hospitals”
Quantitative Easing Worked For The Weimar Republic For A Little While Too
There is a reason why every fiat currency in the history of the world has eventually failed. At some point, those issuing fiat currencies always find themselves giving in to the temptation to wildly print more money…
Between the vets killing themselves, and the mass shooters, one would think that maybe politicians would take the lead on introducing some legislation that addresses both mental health and firearms background checks. They are supposed to be legislators and policymakers, not just fundraisers.
On the one hand there is the zero-firearms crowd who, erroneously in my opinion, think that removing all firearms is the answer. On the other, there is the arms industry which is overwhelming focused on profit, and who frankly don’t really care what people do with the armaments they manufacture.
With our broken campaign finance system, and those who are in power because of it, it seems like an uphill battle. A 20-to-1 spending advantage by gun-rights groups underscores that, with ineffectual legislation introduced for political theater. But one worth fighting.
A reform of both the mental health system and firearms regulation. So when a bill is introduced and we ask, “How would this have prevented Sandy Hook? Or Navy Yard? Or Virginia Tech? Or veteran suicides?”, we’ll actually have an answer that says, “Wow, this actually would prevent and/or mitigate those situations.”
We could start by not using the military so often. And sending arms to Al Qaeda might get a few people killed, right?
Here in the US, I suggest a different view. Recently people legally bought millions of guns and every bit of ammo that could be produced for months. They did this because they fear their own government. A government that spies on us, sees itself above the laws we must live under, shovels money into the richest hands. Maybe if they would ratchet down the growing police state, people out here in the sticks wouldn’t be so nervous.
So, we are sure these Vets used firearms in their suicides? And if firearms were not available, there would be no other way to do it? Not jumping off a bridge or tall structure, not overdosing on Oxycontin or some other prescription drug? Or simply putting a plastic grocery bag over the head and sealing it off with duct tape, or cutting wrists? Or maybe charging at a cop with a baseball bat?
Good on ya, Ben! The solution is stay the hell out of foreign civil wars and bring ‘em all home. The days of providing a “Strong National Offense” for the benefit of the MIC are over. Feinstein and McCain and the other psycho’s can just get their slush fund money from somewhere else.
Hopefully, this recent rejection of another US created drone blitz on some hapless ME nation, in the interest of creating maximum blowback, has made a point among even the Nobel Peacenicks, that the public is growing tired of empire. Now, if people only understood the other costs involved as well, they might begin to understand that Bastiat was on to something when he penned the “Broken Window Fallacy.”
I know this is going to sound callous, us being so evolved and all, but has it occurred to anyone else that we are organic species that must obey that laws of nature one way or another? Could suicides, mass shootings, etc. just be humans instinctual attempt at thinning the herd since we’ve done such a good job at keeping ourselves alive? We are running out of resources and our population numbers are not sustainable. Something has to give.
While we’re being callous, keep in mind how statistically small the number of people being affected by mass shootings is. But they certainly are exciting to report on.
We are running out of resources and our population numbers are not sustainable.
this is wrong and really dangerous thinking. it attempts to justify things like ethnic cleansing. i know you’re not trying to justify it, i’m just giving an example.
when we start to run out of one resource, like oil, there will be others to take it’s place. enough food can be grown within a city to feed the entire city with the right technology. population isn’t the problem. we need big populations to do great things. the less people there are (working) the less we are able to do. the less wealth we create.
ted turner would like to cull a large percentage of the population. the pompous self-righteous jerk should go first.
@tj,
Yes, and if the day comes that populations need culling, let it be by natural selection, and not government induced! Seems governments always make the wrong choices, can’t imagine putting them in charge of more genocides.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-09-23 18:25:41
“…can’t imagine putting them in charge of more genocides.”
It certainly does at current massively inflated asking prices of resale housing considering prices are 250% higher than long term trend. If you buy a house in this environment, you’ll be deep in debt for the rest of your life.
Hey 2Ban, this is your boy-savior Ted Cruz… He wouldn’t even study with “lower Ivy” grads when he was in law school. Imagine what words he’d have for you. ROFL.
—————————
“The elite academic circles that Cruz was now traveling in began to rub off. As a law student at Harvard, he refused to study with anyone who hadn’t been an undergrad at Harvard, Princeton, or Yale. Says Damon Watson, one of Cruz’s law-school roommates: “He said he didn’t want anybody from ‘minor Ivies’ like Penn or Brown.”
“It’s hard for Ted Cruz to be humble. Part of the challenge stems from his résumé, which the Texas senator wears like a sandwich board. There’s the Princeton class ring that’s always on his right hand and the crimson gown that, as a graduate of Harvard Law School, he donned when called upon to give a commencement speech earlier this year. (Cruz’s fellow Harvard Law alums Barack Obama and Mitt Romney typically perform their graduation duties in whatever robes they’re given.) ”
‘Cruz’s fellow Harvard Law alums Barack Obama and Mitt Romney’
Don’t forget the skull and bones Yalies, Bush and Kerry. Interesting how our political system is dominated by silver spoon/lawyer types who traipse off to eastern ‘elite’ schools to get some cred.
“Harvard University set a goal to raise a record $6.5 billion by 2018 to boost education and research and carry out construction projects across the campus.
Harvard has already received $2.8 billion in donations and pledges toward its goal in the past two years, during what’s referred to as a “quiet phase,” Tamara Rogers, vice president for alumni affairs and development, said in an interview. ”
More than anyone I knew, Ted seemed to have arrived in college with a fully formed worldview,” [Princeton] colleague Erik Leitch said. “And what strikes me now, looking at him as an adult and hearing the things he’s saying, it seems like nothing has changed. Four years of an Ivy League education, Harvard Law, and years of life experience have altered nothing.”
While Cruz’s friends from the debate team foresaw a successful career in politics for Cruz, many of the Princeton alums offered that they were deeply troubled by the possibility of Cruz running for president, a notion that one, who did not want to be quoted speaking against a former classmate who is now a senator, called notion “horrifying.”
Craig Mazin said he knew some people might be afraid to speak in the press about a senator, but added of Cruz, “We should be afraid that someone like that has power.”
And the idea that his freshman roommate could someday be the leader of the free world? “I would rather have anybody else be the president of the United States. Anyone,” Mazin said. “I would rather pick somebody from the phone book.”
the idea that his freshman roommate could someday be the leader of the free world? “I would rather have anybody else be the president of the United States. Anyone,”
Demonstrating an overall decline in casual dining, Darden Restaurants on Friday reported first-quarter earnings that were much lower than expected. It also announced major cuts, including job eliminations, Reuters reported.
Darden’s holdings include the Olive Garden and Red Lobster chains.
“Darden in the most recent month was a little bit ahead of the industry, so it is a broader industry problem,” Jeffrey Bernstein, senior restaurant analyst with Barclays, told CNBC.
In a conference call today, CEO Clarence Otis said Darden would cut costs by $25 million in the current fiscal year and $50 million in 2015, including laying off 85 support staff members, according to Reuters. Otis had stated in a release earlier that the sluggish recovery would continue to affect restaurant sales.
Matthew DiFrisco, director and senior restaurant analyst at Lazard Capital Markets, told CNBC that the decline of middle-class casual dining could be connected to an unstable housing market.
“I think with the volatility of the mortgage rates and also the frugalness of the consumer that [the] sector’s very discretionary, and you saw some contraction there,” DiFrisco said.
On the one hand, the timing of my short on the stock market doesn’t matter, since most of my shares were sold in July by someone who broke into my account. On the other hand, I think I must be crazy because the market literally appears to be crashing ever since the day after I was GOING to sell my shorts. This is why I hate stocks so much. I wish I could buy low-priced houses and rent them out for income. That would be so much less risky.
Interesting but unrelated to housing: Ben Jealous (head of the NAACP) is 1/4 black and has a Columbia UG/Oxford grad school pedigree. Also went to a fancy private HS in Monterrey, CA.
Here’s his bio from wikipedia:
———————————
“Jealous was born in Pacific Grove, California and grew up in Monterey Peninsula, California. He holds a B.A. in political science from Columbia University and a master’s degree in comparative social research from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar. Jealous went to York School in Monterey for high school.
His mother, Ann Todd Jealous, who is black, is a retired psychotherapist from Baltimore, Maryland who participated in Western High School’s desegregation.[3] She is also the author, with Caroline Haskell, of Combined Destinies: Whites Sharing Grief about Racism, released in April 2013.[3] His father, Fred Jealous, who is white, from New England, is the Founder and President of the Breakthrough Men’s Community and participated in Baltimore sit-ins to desegregate lunch counters.[3] As a multiracial couple, it was illegal for them to get married in Maryland until 1967; therefore, they had to marry in Washington before returning to Baltimore.[4] Afterward, Jealous’ father was disowned by his white family from New England.[4]“
Also worth pointing out that Jealous’ half-black mom went to Western HS in Baltimore, which is an all-girls public school in the city and one of the 2 or 3 hardest HS’s to get accepted into. It also shares a campus with Polytech which is the best HS in the city. So it’s not like she was really around black people that much either. She was “desegregating the school”, so it was all white when she went. And she herself was only 1/2 black.
LOL @ this guy being the leader of the NAACP. 1/4 black and from a background better than 99.9% of Americans is apparently what you need to lead the NAACP “in the struggle”.
September 20, 2013 5:18 pm
Fed reveals weak spot in superhero powers
By Ralph Atkins in London and Michael MacKenzie in New York
Superman had issues with Kryptonite. For Achilles, it was his heel. With central bankers, is it communicating with markets?
The US Federal Reserve startled investors round the globe this week by deciding not to start scaling back its $85bn a month of asset purchases, or quantitative easing.
Bond and share prices jumped sharply on the prospect of unexpectedly undiminished Fed largesse. But even as they pocketed gains, investors wondered if they had misunderstood Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman. Based on hints dropped since May, the consensus view had been for a $10bn to $15bn reduction in the pace of purchases.
Central banks have sought to increase the effectiveness of their communication during the years of financial crisis. By extending their influence over markets’ expectations of future interest rates, they hope to leverage their superhero powers. But the Fed’s last minute hesitation was a reality check.
“It does raise the question of whether markets will believe the Fed in the future as much as they have in the past,” says Huw Pill, head of European economics at Goldman Sachs. “Why bother with transparency when you can – and do – change your mind,” asks Tom Di Galoma, co-head of rates trading at ED&F Man.
US 10-year Treasury yields, which had hit 3 per cent earlier this month, fell below 2.7 per cent after the Fed’s announcement. The FTSE All-World share index ended the week up more than 2 per cent, while the US S&P 500 reached a fresh record on Thursday.
“It is not so much an Achilles heel but the fact is that the Fed is really driving market prices – and so even subtle shifts in the way the Fed is appraising the situation can make a big difference,” says Julian Callow, international economist at Barclays.
…
Housing Analyst Raises Concerns of Artificial Price Appreciation
“Home price appreciation has been so rampant, particularly in California and Florida, that flippers and get-rich-quick scam artists are flourishing again,” said Chris Cagan, VP at John Burns. “Just as in the mania of 2004-06, flippers make money when the party is raging, but inevitably,” SOMEONE LOSES WHEN THE PARTY IS BUSTED”.
Prominent economist Nouriel Roubini, who is known as “Dr. Doom,” on Monday offered a negative take on gold and certain emerging markets, along with kind words for U.S. and Japanese stocks and the dollar.
“Why are we bearish on gold? Several reasons,” he said while delivering the keynote address at IndexUniverse’s Inside Commodities Conference in New York.
Roubini said tail risks for the global economy have declined and that’s hurt demand for the metal often seen as a safe haven. In addition, gold will be pressured by a strengthening dollar and real interests rates going higher, said the economist, who is known for his generally gloomy views.
In response to a question on areas where he’s more optimistic, Roubini suggested overweighting equities vs. bonds, and within equities, focusing on advanced economies rather than emerging markets — in particular U.S. and Japanese equities rather than European or U.K. stocks.
Roubini was gloomy on commodities in general, saying the “commodity supercycle” is likely over.
“Most commodity prices over the next couple of years are going to be lower rather than higher,” he said. Roubini cited Chinese growth slowing and becoming less resource-intensive, plus the Federal Reserve starting to wind down its stimulus measures. As he did with gold in particular, he also cited higher interest rates and a strengthening dollar, adding that “dollar doomsday folks” are wrong. The U.S. has advantages over other developed nations with its demographics and technology, he said.
Another area to be gloomy? Certain emerging markets with current account deficits and other challenges. Roubini said he’s concerned about nations such as Indonesia, India, Brazil, Turkey and the Ukraine.
…
Precious metals and cash - both! They look very attractive. Good deal to hold for at least 6 years The longer the better. PRPFX versus a 4% commission fee on gold bullion wins in less than 6 years but is a loser after that. The .69 (at least) expense ratio is the killer of PRPFX. Also physical gold and cash are movable and hidable. Hillary will be president in January 2017. She will confiscate 10% of the low hanging fruit: electronic assets. She will take that long before she confiscates our stash of precious metals and fiat currency (under the mattress).
I just found out that my dear late aunt left me a canal-front lot in Port St. Lucie FL and I thought that I’d let y’all know so that you would keep me from getting too excited about it.
Turns out that a quick look at Zillow did that quite well!
She was a wonderful aunt. A single woman, she was always wonderful and encouraging to all her nieces and nephews. She’s much missed.
I don’t have as much good to say about FL real estate. I am guessing that she paid $10,000 for each of 2 lots (one went to me and one to my brother) around 35 years ago.
Mine is worth a bit over $7,000 and brother’s a bit over $8,000. The property taxes she paid in the last 10 years on mine is over $7,000.
The subdivision does not appear to have a bright future.
Well, my kids have a single aunt who is gainfully employed. Perhaps I could gently suggest she invest in some FL land, once the housing market finally bottoms out. Who knows — maybe she will leave some real estate to my kids?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-09-23 18:13:44
P.S. Said “aunt” to my kids (also my sister) used to own an SFR within walking distance of Barton Springs Pool. I bet she would be alot richer at the moment if she had rented that place out instead of selling before moving to CO in the late 1990s — ALOT!
Comment by hip in zilker
2013-09-23 19:25:17
She would be.
If she saw what it’s like in this area now - 1st she would be saddened by the decline in quality of life - pecan-surrounded RV parks on Barton Springs Rd and the less charming auto-related businesses on S. Lamar being replaced by canyons surrounded by monolithic so-called “luxury apartment” complexes with retail, restaurants, and bars supposedly underneath - while places you can get a nice-priced sandwich or buy anything remotely useful move far to the south, undermining the once-great walkability factor. 10,000 “luxury” apartments within a few miles of us (our house is closer to Lamar than to Barton Springs).
Isn’t it great how much the RE racket learned from the luxury condo boom that busted - leading to the trailer park food courts on the denuded building sites. You’ve seen them on the
Food and Travel channels - thanks to our property taxes paying for Austin-promoting PR. But the food trailers are fast being moved off for the luxury apartments. ($1500 min rent. And to be converted to “luxury” condos after the recovery from the luxury apartment bust, when?
Zilker Park (the north side, not the pool side) is closed to the public. They’re preparing for two weeks of ACL and it takes weeks to prepare and weeks to recover (C3 productions - the Lollapalooza organ - gives the city money to rejuvenate the parks. Then they close them for events. It will be partially closed for the holidays for new longer weeks of Trail of Lights.
And I won’t even start on the noise, the traffic, the construction entrances, and the streets both residential and arterial torn up to provide additional infrastructure.
Than after she mourns the loss of quality of life in a place that was really nice, she would wish she hadn’t sold that house until maybe now (or before the next bust anyway). The lost educational funds or sports cars for your kids…
Comment by hip in zilker
2013-09-23 19:40:32
But hey, she could make up for your kids’ lost educational opportunities or sports cars.
Perhaps she would be interested in a couple of lots on a canal in Port St. Lucie with great potential.
Has she always wanted her own line of exotic handbags? Wanted to open a food trailer serving alligator burgers and hot snake dogs? We might be able to cut a deal.
My uncle had a lot or two in some state (not Arizona and not California). After his death I was so involved in consulting that I could not keep up. Stopped paying property taxes on it in 2000. I don’t care if the state took the lots. Hope it did, and hope for a good cause. The place was not mucking fuch anyway.
Don’t be a chump for a sump-pump
The list of good reasons to buy a home includes the desire to put down roots, the freedom to pick your own wallpaper, or even the urge to finally discover what a sump is, and why it needs pumping.
But nowhere on the list will you find “to beat rising mortgage rates” as a reason to rush out and buy a house.
Unless you’re considering that place down the street where the renters never clean up the yard. In that case, you should buy tomorrow and keep the neighborhood beautiful by either hiring a lawn service or renting to a sorority for supermodels.
Not exactly a case of mee-ouch!
To hear some people talk, anyone who doesn’t buy a house yesterday is losing out big time, because mortgage rates have climbed by nearly a full percentage point during the last 12 months. This indeed could be a panic-inducing financial development if it weren’t for the fact that mortgages are cheaper now than they were during World War II, a time when the housing market was depressed because home buyers feared they’d have to learn the German phrase for “closing costs.”
So how much of a hit has a prospective homeowner taken since last year? Rates went from an average of 3.6 percent to 4.5 percent, meaning that on a $100,000 loan, your monthly payment has gone up $52.04. That’s a real budget-buster, being about what the average American spends on caring for the family cat.
(I won’t say you can overcome the slight increase in cost of home ownership by ditching your cat, but let’s note that you don’t get much equity out of Fluffy’s hairballs, either.)
Over the life of a 30-year loan, that $52 will increase your total interest cost by nearly $19,000. Contrast that to rates in 2005 at the peak of the housing bubble, when a 30-year loan averaged 5.87 percent. People couldn’t grab mortgages fast enough then, even though the total interest cost at that rate was more than $30,000 higher.
No house of pain, please
The time to buy a house is when you can afford it, including down payment, fees, insurance, taxes, moving costs and upkeep. You also should be able to stay put for five years to recoup your purchase costs.
If mortgage rates go up, you can buy a less expensive property, put more money down, buy down your mortgage rate by paying points, or work out some combination of all of those. For example, borrowing $90,000 instead of $100,000 at 4.5 percent would keep your monthly payment the same as borrowing $100,000 at last year’s rate.
Don’t let the overwhelming desire to grab a home, sweet home mortgage rate sour your finances. Buy what you can afford when you’re ready, and you, too, can enjoy years of happy sump pumping.
Times are even worse in Detroit than we thought, from today’s Detnews:
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes agreed to delay a crucial hearing on a proposed settlement of $250 million in debt tied to the City of Detroit’s pension crisis.
The city requested a delay of the hearing, which was set for today and Wednesday, because it is “engaged in ongoing discussions” over the interest-rate swaps, which are held by UBS and Bank of America.
The settlement would pay the two banks between 75 and 82 cents on the dollar. In exchange, the banks would drop their claim to about $11 a month in revenue from the city’s three casinos.
While there’s a serious dog problem in Detroit, the initial results of an effort to count the number of homeless canines in the city indicate there are far fewer than that some news accounts have talked about.
“We’re not seeing mass numbers; we’re not tripping over dogs in the streets that are biting us and chasing us,” Tom McPhee, filmmaker and Executive Director of the , tells MLive.
He adds that “Detroit has problems — we just think it’s a bit much that Detroit is being jumped on with this idea whole that there are 50,000 stray dogs and they’re biting and hurting and its a vicious situation. In terms of actual, what we call actual, stray dogs, the number is demonstrably different than 50,000 number that’s being published.”
Just how much different the American Strays census concludes the number really is should be known in several weeks.
The project also aims to put GPS tracking collars on 50 of the strays, to keep tabs on where they go. Many dogs are known to live in some of the estimated 30,000 abandoned homes in the city.
Quinn Klinefelter of NPR member station WDET tells our friends at All Things Considered that even if the stray count ends up being much less than the 50,000 figure, the city still has a huge problem. Its three authorized shelters take in 15,000 stray dogs a year, he reports, and can’t cope with an influx of strays.
What’s more, “cash-strapped animal control department has only four active officers — a fifth is recovering from being mauled in a kennel,” Quinn says.
…
Apparently Detroit is not the only spot in the U.S. with dog issues. Pretty much wherever pit bulls are owned or bred, anyone who crosses paths with them is exposed to the risk of attack.
COLTON: Child, 2, dies in apparent dog mauling
September 23, 2013 by Richard Brooks
An apparent dog-mauling killed a 2-year-old child in Colton, police say.
The attack was reported at 5:32 p.m. along the 700 block of West Citrus Avenue in Colton.
Officers found the youngster suffering from extensive upper body injuries. The child died at a nearby hospital.
Animal control officers took custody of what police described as five mixed-breed pit bulls.
Police were conducting interviews and released no details of the circumstances of the attack.
Mumbai: The deepening economic slowdown, rising cost of living and low wage revisions, coupled with higher interest rares, are forcing salaried professionals who had earlier invested in properties to put them up for sale, say industry experts.
People who had invested in properties some 10-15 years ago are now finding it difficult to service their home loans which have become too expensive now due to the rising interest rates and falling rental yields.
According to a survey, resale inventory has increased nearly 30 per cent over the last six months.
“Economic slowdown has hit the real estate industry. Salaried professionals who had invested in properties five-six years ago to cash in on the boom, are now looking to sell them as they are finding it difficult to cope with the high cost of living,” property portal Housing.co.in co-founder and marketing head Advitiya Sharma told PTI.
He said the resale market is currently dominated by young professionals and the high cash inflows that the sector gets, has made it a lucrative field.
“In the current economic conditions, finding a tenant with higher rents has become more challenging as people have become cautious due to uncertain economic conditions and are thus opting for properties with similar or lower rents,” DTZ India chief executive Anshul Jain said.
Primary buyers are willing to deal in the resale sector than new homes due to the risks involved in new projects, said Shashank Jain, executive director, PricewaterhouseCoopers.
“Such resale inventory is mainly concentrated in large metro cities. Buyers are looking at such opportunities as they get closer to possession prices and do not have to worry about risks involved in new projects. On the other hand, sellers benefit as they can get higher returns on their investment, than settling for low rental yields,” he said.
Jain further mentioned that this situation will, however, not attract investors.
“Such deals will attract primary buyers. But people who are looking at investing in properties at this moment, may not consider this option,” he added.
…
Climbing interest rates could weaken Florida’s brisk housing recovery, especially among middle-class families and first-time homebuyers, a new University of Florida survey concludes.
But real estate experts in Southwest Florida have suggested this region should escape the brunt of the impact because nearly two-thirds of all buyers pay cash for residences here.
The university’s review found the general investment outlook for all sectors of the market declined for the first time in two years in the second quarter ended June 30.
The survey of 145 real estate analysts, investors and brokers shows optimism from previous quarters has waned — and will continue to weaken if mortgage rates rise.
“There are a lot of deals being done right now. That’s why the market has really picked up,” Timothy Becker, director of UF’s Bergstrom Center for Real Estate Studies, said in a statement. “But as those interest rates start to tick up and if they continue at this pace, it’s going to get to the point where it’s difficult to make deals work at the current rates.”
…
I have to check on that long-term Treasury mutual fund I snapped up a couple of months back. If the stock market correction gathers steam, it could do quite nicely!
U.S. Treasury yields are declining today after remarks from Fed Presidents Dudley and Lockhart advocating easy monetary policy to support a still struggling economy.
Both indicated that there are enough headwinds to the recovery to necessitate a continuation of the $85 billion in asset purchases the Fed conducts each month to keep interest rates low and provide adequate liquidity to the financial markets. Their remarks support the FOMC’s decision to keep QE unchanged at their last meeting and have eased worries of an October tapering mentioned by Bullard and George late last week.
At midday, the 10 year note is trading at a 2.71% yield, 3 basis points lower than Friday. The long bond is at 3.74%, 2 basis points lower. The yield curve has flattened 3 basis points to 238 bps.
…
I throw $100 monthly into the high yield corporate bond fund VWESX. I rarely ever sell stock mutual funds. I rarely ever put large lump sums into them. But when I need the cash I sell my biggest winner. If I have cash and need to save it somewhere I buy a big lump sum of my biggest loser.
“Och-Ziff were perhaps a little early but used the last 10 months to unwind their real estate and exit the landlord business as the hedge-fund sponsored echo-bubble in housing rolled over into the mainstream.”
“Oaktree, which specializes in distressed investing, and Carrington had initially planned on converting their portfolio into a real estate investment trust. But investors have now decided to simply exit the trade. Their asking price for the portfolio could not be learned.”
Poh Eddie…poh, poh Eddie…
Atlanta Housing Market Slowdown on its Way Real Estate Brokerage Redfin Explains why Atlanta’s Hyper Home-Price Growth will Taper or Even Drop by Year End
By Redfin Corporation
Published: Thursday, Sep. 12, 2013 - 6:08 am
ATLANTA, Sept. 12, 2013 — /PRNewswire/ — Redfin (www.redfin.com), the technology-powered real estate brokerage, today released its first-ever in-depth analysis on housing market conditions focusing specifically on the Atlanta metro area. After a year of uncharacteristically steep home-price growth, several factors indicate that the Atlanta housing market can no longer support double-digit growth rates, and the market will most likely see a sustained slowdown by the end of this year.
The report shows:
* Mortgage rate increases priced some buyers out of the market, a likely cause for the dip in August home sales. Rates are likely to continue to rise as the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program winds down. In an August survey, nearly 30% of Redfin buyers looking for a home in Atlanta said that they would “step back” or “stop” their home search if mortgage rates rose above 5%.
* Investors are leaving the market, with the number of homes purchased by firms decreasing from 28% to 23% of sales.
* Sellers are accepting lower prices, with Redfin buyers paying an average of 5% below list price compared to 1% below a year ago.
* New construction will ease inventory shortages. As of July, Atlanta had issued the third largest number of new residential building permits in the country in 2013.
…
India’s economic slowdown, high inventories of unsold homes and changes in regulations by the central bank, are set to put downward pressure on home prices in major cities, experts say.
Yashwant Dalal, the president of the Estate Agents Association of India, says that rates are set to fall as the festive season approaches. “Prices are on a deep slope and will be tumbling fast,” he says, explaining that property prices in Mumbai have risen to unrealistically high levels.
“The residential real estate demand has been subdued in the recent past with the consumers following a wait-and-watch policy,” according to a report on Mumbai’s property market released this month by Icra, a credit rating firm in India. “With the approvals gradually flowing in, the pace of new launches is expected to increase, thereby leading to increase in supply in the market.
“Going forward, considering the increase in inventory levels, subdued demand scenario with no immediate improvement in sight, and uncertain macro environment, the developers would find it difficult to increase prices. While the announced prices appear to have remained firm in the recent past, there has been a tacit price correction brought around through innovative marketing schemes being offered by developers.”
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently banned banks from issuing loans under the “80:20 scheme”, which through a three-way agreement between the lender, the developer and the homebuyer, allowed the customer to pay 20 per cent upfront, while the remainder of the loan would be issued to the developer, regardless of the stage of construction.
“Several viewpoints have been floated since the RBI announced this ban, largely speculating on a fall in real estate prices as a consequence,” said Ashutosh Limaye, the head of research and real estate intelligence service at Jones Lang LaSalle India. “It has been opined that developers’ holding power will be significantly reduced, forcing them to reduce prices. This analysis of the situation is based on the currently high levels of inventory that developers are saddled with, especially in larger cities like Mumbai, Bangalore and Delhi.
“Indeed, inventory levels in the leading seven cities in India are much higher than the comfortable industry levels seen around eight to 10 months ago, which is between 14-15 months’ worth of unsold supply,” Mr Limaye added.
…
ENID, Okla. — Enid employers are concerned they will be unable to fill vacant jobs, while employees are concerned they will not be able to find proper housing.
Whitney Box, city of Enid director of strategic and long-range planning, outlined concerns raised in a recent housing survey done by Enid Regional Development Alliance.
The price of housing in Enid has risen 34.5 percent since 2005, she said, and there is a critical need for lower-cost housing, or homes priced $150,000 and below. The average sale price of a new home in Enid has risen to $247,000.
…
By Carl Bonham for UHERO - Honolulu City Council Resolution 13-168 would amend the percentages of affordable housing units that developers must provide to receive authorization for housing projects. Current city policy requires that 10% of a development’s units must be affordable for households earning no more than 80% of the HUD median income for Honolulu.
Another 10% of units in a development should be affordable for families earning between 80 and 120% of the median income, and 10% for families earning between 120 and 140% of the median income. The resolution proposes that the mix of affordable housing required of developers be reconsidered. The intent is to change the requirements in a way that leads to more affordable housing for those who need it the most.
While requiring developers to set aside a fraction of a project to be sold at below market prices may seem like a reasonable way of dealing with the problem of affordable housing, economic theory and years of experience suggest exactly the opposite. Such requirements, known as inclusionary zoning (IZ), act as a tax on developers with the proceeds used to subsidize housing for gap income households earning between 80 and 140 percent of the median income. But that tax reduces incentives for developers to produce all forms of housing, and will reduce the overall supply of housing units and increase the price of housing.
In 2010, UHERO conducted a comprehensive review of studies that analyzed IZ policies across the United States.1 Approximately 90% of the studies concluded that IZ increases the market price of housing and decreases housing units available in the market. Of the 18 studies that were able to quantify the effect of inclusionary zoning on housing market outcomes, 13 found that IZ policies both increased the market price of housing and decreased housing units available in the market, and three more studies found evidence of at least one of those effects. UHERO’s report concluded that “Inclusionary Zoning policies have failed in other jurisdictions, and are failing on Oahu.” Such policies have not delivered substantial numbers of affordable housing units to households the programs were designed to help.
The undersupply of housing services relative to household formation on Oahu is a chronic problem. While IZ policies are politically appealing, they mistakenly tax housing to encourage more of it! The effect of a tax on the production of any product, housing included, is relatively straightforward. The extra tax imposed by IZ increases the cost to developers and limits the supply of housing provided. Facing the additional cost, developers will build fewer housing units, all else equal. In the worst case scenario, if the expected loss on the affordable units does not allow developers to meet their required rate of return, then projects will never get off the ground. The primary means of insuring the project is viable is to produce more upscale, higher priced homes to offset the loss on the subsidized housing.2 So, the IZ tax not only reduces the overall supply of housing, it also changes the mix of housing by encouraging higher end and more expensive housing developments.
“Low-cost housing is usually produced through a process called filtering where existing housing units drop in cost as their relative quality falls, rather than through construction of new, lower-cost units.” (Feldman, 2002 p. 9) Over time, the existing stock of housing depreciates and declines in quality relative to new amenity rich units. For example, new housing often includes central air-conditioning and energy saving appliances, whereas twenty years ago few housing units would have such amenities.
…
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Citigroup Inc. (C -3.20%) will cut 1,000 jobs in its mortgage business in the U.S., according to a statement by the firm on Monday. The firm is making nationwide cuts after higher interest rates have slowed down its new loans and refinancing business. “In response to decreased demand for mortgage originations and refinancing, CitiMortgage is eliminating some positions in sales, fulfillment, underwriting and mortgage default functions predominantly at Citi sites in Las Vegas, Nevada and Irving, Texas,” said the firm in a statement. The firm’s Las Vegas office will see about 760 cuts, while its Irving, Texas cite will see approximately 100 cuts. The cuts make up about eight percent of the firm’s mortgage division. Citi is the latest firm to announce cuts in its mortgage division following disappointing results. Citigroup shares fell more than 3% in trading on reports of a drop-off in trading revenues.
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
Detroit News: Most properties in Wayne County foreclosure auctions repeat cycle of unpaid taxes
Detroit — Wayne County treasurer officials are foreclosing on thousands of properties from tax scofflaws, only to sell them to buyers who don’t pay taxes either, newly released records show.
Nearly 80 percent of 18,568 properties bought at the treasurer’s controversial foreclosure auctions in the last two years are now delinquent on taxes, according to county records from this month. One recent study found the bankrupt city of Detroit alone is owed about $70 million in taxes from the properties.
The situation frustrates critics who have been pushing for an overhaul of the annual online auction, which ends its first round this week. They argue the auction breeds a vicious cycle: Speculators buy properties for as little as $500 apiece, sit on them or milk houses for rental cash for three years without paying taxes until they are foreclosed on again.
Many of the bulk buyers The News examined from the last two auctions were tax delinquents, including 117 properties purchased in 2011 by attorney Robert Vanderwoude and put in the name of Detroit resident Bernice Pinkston-Carpenter.
All but one of the 117 properties is behind on taxes, for nearly $625,000 as of earlier this month. The average auction sale price for the properties was $650.
Wayne county can seize the land under a clause the treasurer added to deeds in 2011 and 2012 that requires buyers stay current on taxes or risk losing properties. The reform was added after a series of stories in The Detroit News about buyers who buy back their own foreclosed properties.
“We don’t want to sell properties to people who aren’t going to pay taxes,” Chief Deputy Treasurer David Szymanski said. “We are trying to break that cycle.”
But his office doesn’t have a plan on what to do with the land it takes back. Szymanski said he would hope to work with the state or city land banks to sell the properties to buyers who have proven to be more responsible.
A separate group wants Detroit Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr to step in.
A proposal being pitched by a coalition of community groups and backed by the Michigan Legislative Black Caucus, called Project 99, would have the city seize the properties now through a nonprofit and sell them to buyers deemed responsible. The plan would take only properties owned by investors, not owner-occupied ones.
FYI - Detroit has some of the highest property taxes in America.
How is that working out?
Yet not one cut to insane public union salaries/benefits/pensions.
How high can the taxes be on a $500 house?!?!
How high can the taxes be on a $500 house?!?!
WHATEVER the assessing/tax authority decides. If the homeowner doesn’t like it he can (1) decline to pay tax (2) appeal through tax authority or through the courts, depending on local laws. I am not aware of alternatives.
The highest rates of food stamps are in overwhelmingly white areas with high % of GOP voters.
But don’t let facts bother you. The facts are the Romney dominated the areas with the highest %s of food stamps and disability.
i posted several links filled with data last week in response to 2ban’s posts on this topic.
and reminded the hbb that the real welfare queens are the government contractors that cost taxpayers 500,000,000,000+ dollars a year.
Something like 80% of the highest food stamp counties went for Romney in ‘12. It’s really mind blowing when you remember that Mitt only got 200 electoral votes.
In addition to the contractors you mention, also remember that Medicare and SS are dominated by the 65+ set, which is the only age demographic that McCain and Romney won.
So the GOP is the party whose members are most attached to the government teat.
So the GOP is the party whose members are most attached to the government teat.
nope. but they have the biggest percentage of liberals that claim to be conservative, otherwise known as ‘establishment republicans’ or ‘rinos’.
they have the biggest percentage of liberals that claim to be conservative, otherwise known as ‘establishment republicans’ or ‘rinos’.
Then the true GOP is a very small party, no? Representative of very few.
Then the true GOP is a very small party, no? Representative of very few.
yes, that’s true.
yes, that’s true.
Could be a problem in a democracy.
Dnc = wealthy party
Gop = less wealthy party
I thought this was the case for many years. Notice all of the DNC major wins during the recent elections are the richest cities/regions in America
This is just untrue and you know it. I posted about his false stat last week. The fact that you need to keep pushing a false stat makes me wonder why. Concerned about the implications ?
The top 10 most populous counties are:
LA, CA –Obama, population: 9.9 million
Cook County, Ill – Obama, population: 5.2 million
Harris, TX – Obama, population: 4.2 million
Maricopa, AZ – Romney, population: 3.9 million
San Diego, CA – Obama, population: 3.1 million
Orange County, CA – Romney, population: 3.1 million
Miami-Dade, FLA – Obama, population: 2.5 million
King County, NY – Obama, population: 2.5 million
Dallas, TX – Obama, population: 2.4 million
Queens County, NY – Obama, population: 2.2 million
These amount to 39 million people. 80% of those top 10 counties went for Obama. 2 counties with 7 million for Romney. 8 Counties with 32 million for Obama.
Guess what you see in the next 10 most populous? Same thing.
Correct, not only wealthiest also most populous regions.
“The Bloomberg review of 2,049 counties where the data was available included the 250 with the highest concentration of food stamp recipients. Among that group, 227 are wholly within one congressional district, with 160 represented by Republicans and 67 by Democrats. ”
Bloomberg
Your base is on SNAP, GOPsters.
Now you know!
Alpha you are a partisan hack. I googled your quote and you clearly aren’t reading the article or are deliberately misrepresenting. This does NOT say anything about populations of those counties. There could be 5 or more low population rural counties in a single district. It is a gamed stat deliberately designed for a hit piece. The county they use for an example, Owlsley County, KY , has a population of 4,722 people according to the article. Yeah, compare that to LA or Cook County where there are 14 million people total. Quit peddling the lie.
Thanks Bloomberg!
‘Alpha you are a partisan hack’
Yeah, we know and most of us ignore his BS.
“Alpha you are a partisan hack. I googled your quote and you clearly aren’t reading the article or are deliberately misrepresenting.
That’s what Slob does. Deliberately misrepresent. He’s exemplifies the Blog Liars Club.
Right Slob?
“Wayne county can seize the land under a clause the treasurer added to deeds in 2011 and 2012 that requires buyers stay current on taxes or risk losing properties.”
You would think that a home owner should know better.
aapl up 30 bucks this morning. evidently those sheep standing inline made a difference for shareholders.
Detroit — The first big brawl in Detroit’s bankruptcy case will play out this week when the city’s lawyers try to persuade the judge that two Wall Street banks deserve to cut in front of pensioners and bondholders in the debt payment line.
Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr’s bid to untangle a complicated debt transaction blamed as one of the underpinnings of Detroit’s plunge into bankruptcy could set the stage for the rest of his plan to rescue the city from crippling debt.
His proposal to pay UBS AG and Bank of America at least $250 million to terminate an interest rate swap arrangement that went bad for the city during the recession is opposed by insurers of the debt who stand to lose millions of dollars and retirees owed billions of dollars in promised retirement benefits.
Some legal and financial experts also question why Orr is trying to settle with the two big banks so quickly in the bankruptcy process.
“He gave the banks a big, wet sloppy kiss,” said Michael Greenberger, a financial derivatives expert at the University of Maryland law school. “Why should the banks get 75 to 82 cents on the dollar, but the Detroit workers get 10 cents on the dollar? Whose life is destroyed by this?”
A committee of retirees also is urging U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes to reject the settlement, which will be litigated over three days of hearings set to begin Tuesday.
“Once (the banks) take this money, that’s money that’s not available to satisfy the claims of the other claimants,” said Peter Shapiro, a South Orange, N.J., financial consultant who advises cities and states on interest rate swaps.
Orr has said he has no choice but to pay UBS and Bank of America a large chunk of what they’re owed because the banks control access to $15 million a month in casino tax revenues through another deal that staved off bankruptcy for the Motor City in 2009.
“The city needs the casino revenue badly,” Orr said last month in a sworn deposition. “Every day that we don’t have access to casino revenue, we cannot make the necessary reinvestment in this city to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens.”
…
In 2006, city leaders agreed to a fixed 6.3 percent interest rate on $800 million borrowed to pour into the pension funds. As part of the deal, the banks dangled what seemed to city leaders like a lucrative advantage: The banks would pay Detroit the difference between variable interest rates and the city’s fixed rate.
Based on rates at the time, the deal made the actual monthly payment for taxpayers less than 1 percent, city records show.
The deal was hailed by Wall Street insiders for its creativity in financing part of the $1.44 billion that former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick borrowed in 2005 and 2006 to fund pensions. It also appeared to lower costs for Detroit’s beleagured general fund.
City leaders effectively bet that variable interest rates would remain high, which would keep the costs to Detroit low — but the opposite occurred.
The city’s situation got worse in 2009 when Wall Street rating agencies downgraded Detroit’s credit rating to junk status, triggering a default on the swaps and the threat of an immediate $400 million termination payment that could have sent the city into bankruptcy, Harris said.
Harris, working under interim Mayor Ken Cockrel Jr. at the time, negotiated a deal with UBS and a Bank of America subsidiary to pledge the city’s $15 million in monthly casino taxes as collateral to keep the swaps arrangement in place — and avoid the potentially lethal termination fee.
“There was no question in anybody’s mind, because the city couldn’t come up with the $400 million, that bankruptcy was right around the corner,” he said.
Should have gone bankrupt then & there.
“Deserve gots nothing to to do with it”
“His proposal to pay UBS AG and Bank of America at least $250 million to terminate an interest rate swap arrangement that went bad for the city during the recession is opposed by insurers of the debt who stand to lose millions of dollars and retirees owed billions of dollars in promised retirement benefits.”
Didn’t Larry Summers lose Harvard University a lot of money with an interest rate swap arrangement that went bad?
Anyone who does not believe that these guys are all in cahoots with one another, that Wall Street runs Washington and that we are not even pawns in their chess game needs to check out “House of Cards” on Netflix. After watching the first season, rational ignorance looks pretty darn rational!
Surrogacy agencies in China and the United States are catering to wealthy Chinese who want a baby outside the country’s restrictive family planning policies, who are unable to conceive themselves, or who are seeking U.S. citizenship for their children.
Emigration as a family is another draw - U.S. citizens may apply for Green Cards for their parents when they turn 21.
While there is no data on the total number of Chinese who have sought or used U.S. surrogates, agencies in both countries say demand has risen rapidly in the last two years.
U.S. fertility clinics and surrogacy agencies are creating Chinese-language websites and hiring Mandarin speakers.
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-09-22 17:04:30
The Federal Reserve has been creating a bunch of money since the 90’s and vast amounts in the last few years. Does it take a decade or two for inflation to show up? Or do we just get bubbles?
——————————————————————————–
What exactly am I supposed to be looking for to “show up?”
I know what the signs of poison ivy are, but how do I know when Im experiencing “inflation?”
When you drive by the gas station in the morning at $3.50 and when you drive by on the home in the evening the price is $3.69?
Actually, everyone thinks of inflation as from the 1970s. Prices going up quickly but wages going up almost as quickly. And with high interest rates.
With globalism we now have prices going quickly for things you need to survive (housing, food, medical care, education, etc.) but this is coupled with declining wages. With ZIRP there is 0% interest rates (for the connected).
This is a new type of inflation for America.
You can see how it ends by reading of life in North Korea. For some reason, I have read a few books on it recently.
An all powerful government telling you life is great and there is no inflation yet your pay can not even buy the basic foods (if they are even available). The government and the rich (all connected to government) live just fine. If you want to eat - you can sell your cloths/furniture/pot/pans/etc. Complaining is punishable by death or long prison terms for you and your entire extended family (and three generation of those yet to born). Escape is punishable by death.
“Actually, everyone thinks of inflation as from the 1970s. Prices going up quickly but wages going up almost as quickly. And with high interest rates.”
IIRC, wages didn’t grow with prices; stagflation became the new meme.
“I have read a few books on it recently”
HA! I am just finishing “Kim Jong-Il: North Korea’s Dear Leader” by Michael Breen.
This book will serve as a model for Obama’s third term. Obama’s permanent term, when he becomes president for life!
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Also recommended: “The Aquariums of Pyongyang” by Chor-hwan Kang.
‘…how do I know when Im experiencing “inflation?”’
1) You notice it costs twice as much to fill your gas tank as it did just a few years ago.
2) You notice that you either come home from the grocery store with a half-full shopping cart or else you pay twice as much for a full cart compared with just a few years ago.
Wait a minute…
“how do I know when Im experiencing “inflation?”
Perhaps you would have to jump into the sewer that all this supposed money flows through to get a personal experience of it. Not likely you will since you are making a living off the deflation that many are having a personal experience with.
For those of you who enjoy freezing in the dark in your house.
Obama’s is just keeping his campaign promises.
He promised to ruin the coal industry.
He promised to raise taxes.
He promised to ruin health care.
If your electric costs double - how many more jobs lost?
How many more homeowners forced into bankruptcy?
——————–
New carbon emission rules will devastate the coal industry
American Thinker | 9-21-2013 | Rick Moran
The UN’s climate change panel is set to release a report next month that reluctantly concludes there has been no warming of the earth in at least the last 15 years. Fewer and fewer people are believers that climate change is man made.
This hasn’t stopped the Obama administration from releasing new rules governing “carbon pollution” at new power plants that would mean the virtual destruction of the coal industry.
If you use over 600 kw / month where I am the rates go to 32- 35 cents / kw. your inititial 600kw are at about 14 cents / kw.
We paid $0.14/kw-hr for “below baseline rates” electric power in coastal California back in the mid-nineties. I don’t recall what the baseline power limit was or what the prices were over baseline, but it was really expensive. We usually rented 50’s homes, which were not energy efficient. Sweat pants and shirt were our evening attire during the brief wet winters.
Dang! I pay about 8 cents/kwh, and no baseline either. And Colorado generates 10%+ of its juice from windmills, and that’s expected to grow to 20%+ in a few more years.
my highest electric bill this year was $55
“I pay about 8 cents/kwh, and no baseline either.”
Near the Columbia River Hydro-Power Complex residential power is $0.0375/kw-hr, and our “all electric” spec house rarely exceeds the baseline except in the deepest of cold-snaps, which are below zero. We usually hover around 24-degrees F during the winter months.
You want to see why electric prices might go up just watch what happens when a $45 billion electric utility goes bankrupt. Google ‘Energy Futures Holdings’. When you look how greedy Wall St. crooks rigged this deal it was bound to collapse and the losses will be dumped on consumers and tax payers. Since this deal went down in 2007 you can’t blame Obama for this one. Natural gas is killing coal, cheap wind and solar is killing coal, technology is killing coal and yes the EPA is killing coal. Just remember the climate we have today is a result of 50 years of cumulative GHG emissions and despite years of cooler Pacific Ocean waters (La-Nina) global temperatures haven’t gone down. Next time the La-Nino cycle kicks in we might see a new world record.
If you’ve been following what’s been going on in the nuclear industry, the future of that is going to have a few hurdles in our future too.
Cheap wind and solar do not exist except where massive subsidies make them so.
Exactly.
So why is it cheaper in Colorado? We get the same “subsidies” as everyone else. And even without the subsidies, which are about 2 cents per kwh, we’re still cheaper than most places coal generated power.
This inability to do the long math is a byproduct of the housing mania.
So you’re a energy expert?
http://www.dallasnews.com/business/energy/20130920-wind-power-generation-surges-in-texas.ece
http://www.forbes.com/sites/edfenergyexchange/2013/01/28/new-ercot-report-shows-that-texas-wind-and-solar-are-highly-competitive-with-natural-gas/
http://www.ercot.com/content/news/presentations/2013/2012%20Long%20Term%20System%20Assessment.pdf
Coal is 18th century technology that will struggle to keep a shrinking share of the US market. The only reason it’s still viable is it gets to avoid the external costs of it’s pollution. That’s changing both here and in China.
“China Makes Cheap Coal Expensive”
http://oilprice.com/Finance/investing-and-trading-reports/China-Makes-Cheap-Coal-Expensive.html
-and-
“China local governments propose 2-10 percent coal resource tax”
http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/09/17/us-china-coal-tax-idINBRE98G04120130917
If wind and solar were more economical, there wouldn’t be coal, hydro, nuke or combined cycle gas plants.
If wind and solar were more economical, there wouldn’t be coal, hydro, nuke or combined cycle gas plants.
spot on.. again.
I assume you guys mean “IF wind and solar were more econmical, there wouldn’t be any coal, hydro, nuke or combined cyle gas plants IF you could find an economy where new power generation facilities could be created with no start up costs.”
I don’t see any places where the new facilities can be created at no cost, so your statement is useless.
IF you could find an economy where new power generation facilities could be created with no start up costs.
Polly, why would you assume that we’re talking about no start up costs? that would mean that they are still uneconomical. to be economic, they must overcome the included start up costs. in other words, if it were profitable, it would have been done.
efficiency is rising and prices are coming down in solar, so in the near future, solar might be a very good option for a lot of people. in some cases, it already is. but there is still a ways to go.
Lying lawyers are funny when they detect they’re losing control.
“I don’t see any places where the new facilities can be created at no cost…”
On the contrary, we have had a decade of “build it for the government subsidy”. Facilities depreciate and are always being replaced. The most economical technology will be used, or the most subsidized.
“Coal is 18th century technology…”
Gasp!
I don’t think I’ve ever been in a coal fired electric plant built in the 1700s.
Lookie here and get you some fresh talking points.
Stop Subsidizing Solar Power!
http://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2013/09/23/stop-subsidizing-solar-power/
Solar is 67% more expensive than wind and twice as expensive as natural gas.
Solar costs about 80 cents per kilowatt hour (kwh) compared to the national average of about 10 cents per kwh.
Solar panels rank 28th out of 33 carbon-reduction options.
People desire solar panels because they convey “green” status.
These cold hard fact should help you defeat those communist treehuggers when they have the nerve to promote this socialist UN Agenda 21 scam.
**Be sure to check out the winning eco-Nazis in the comments.
PS: Your utility company just added $7.25 a month to your electric bill so they could pay their CEO a $30 million dollar bonus. America is #1
We know what green, sustainable, solar and wind powered societies look like. Colonial America, Medieval Europe, Incan Empire, Roman Empire, etc… This time with high tech for the 1%!!
It’s not that hard to understand why solar and wind are becoming more affordable. Last year I did the math and my benchmark was the 10 year (2% yield) bond vs. a 6 KW solar array over 25 years or my annual electric bill. I paid $24,000 (installed) for my array (no tax credits) and have generated 17.7 Megawatts and I have a $176 credit on my utility bill. Compare this to 2011 when my annual electric bill was over $2,600 (note 2011 was the hottest year on record in Texas so lets just say $2,0000 yr.). Just locking in my electric costs for 25 years seems like a better deal than trying to factor in the constant inflation in energy prices.
One more thing, one of these days I’m going to hook this thing up to some batteries and drop off the grid. That’s a kind of freedom very few people have and it’s worth something. Kind of like having a gun means you don’t have to depend on the police when trouble comes knocking at your door.
I think this is great. But do not believe modern wind and solar can scale to run society as set up today, especially without a fossil fuel based platform on which to be built.
6 KW solar array over 25 years
I’ve been looking into going solar and one of the things I think I’ve learned is that solar power has a high upkeep (keeping the panels clean) and that they also degrade over time regardless of upkeep and lose their efficiency. I guess your solar panels are producing 6KW right now; any idea how many kilowatts they’re supposed to generate at year 15? 20? 25? As best I could tell, after factoring in degradation the solution wasn’t good enough and I decided to wait. Curious what your thoughts are, thanks.
My panels are ground mounted for optimum angle and cooling. I have cleaned them 4 time in 19 months and it takes about 20 min. and 50 gallons of water. If you can only mount them on a roof then they will be harder to clean, degrade faster because of the heat buildup and will need to be reinstalled when your roof needs replacing. You should wait till they get the efficiency up to 30% (mine are 15%). It will take 1/2 the space of current systems and will probably output AC directly instead of DC like mine. One more thing, the reason I have a credit on my electric bill is because I won a energy saver contest last year and added 3 extra panels so my current system is actually 6.7 KW now.
One last thought, avoid leasing. It’s a gimmick to turn Solar City into a unregulated utility. At some point they will package up the lease contracts and sell them off to Wall St. and stiff the customers when problems develop.
If you can only mount them on a roof then they will be harder to clean, degrade faster because of the heat buildup and will need to be reinstalled when your roof needs replacing.
I’ve heard they prolong the life of your roof though, because they protect it from much of the elements, and keep it cooler by shading it.
So maybe it’s a wash? I was thinking of installing them on my garage roof, to power an electric car. Figured they’d be easier to service and clean on a low roof, and not take up yard space.
It’s a tough call. The ideal solution would be to install a metal roof first and then you do get the benefit of the shade from the panels without the remove/replace hassles. I have that on my long term wish list when my roof plays out in another 10 years. A$$holes on the local zoning board changed the rules 3 months ago on roof top panels so they have to be mounted no more than 6″ above the roof and must match roof slope exactly, can’t be seen from the street and you have to have a 1 acre lot before they will let you do a new ground mount system. They love putting sand in the gears of progress. It’s funny in a way, they hate solar panels because they act like a symbol of anti-fossil fuel green/communist/left wing eco-Nazis. I see them as a symbol of freedom from energy monopolies.
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/pv/public_systems/3Fzt45951
The back of my garage faces south, so I could meet all those requirements you cite pretty easily. I suspect we have similar requirements here.
When Silicon Valley gets going it spills over into the Central Valley…
http://cl.exct.net/?ju=fe5d1c717262047f741d&ls=fe1b1d777d6c017e741275&m=fefc1172766306&l=fed1157376640678&s=fe35157277640d7d711074&jb=ffcf14&t=
What are their commute times?
If I had to be one of those “super commuters” I would drive my car off a bridge
Forget the car. I’d throw myself off a bridge.
Forgot to mention that I’ll have a dozen Realtors® handcuffed in the backseat and trunk when I drive off the bridge
lmao
I’d throw myself off a bridge.
Yeah, it’s the kind of thing that makes you pay extra to live near your job.
Because a 2×4 is triple the price depending on location right Slob?
Too funny. In my forty years of “jobs”, living close in was the cheapest option. People were paying more not to live in the decayed center. Of course I’ve worked in industry, which is nothing like living off of government.
Because a 2×4 is triple the price depending on location right Slob?
If it keeps you from jumping off a bridge, then it should be rather valuable.
Run slob Run!
Run slob Run!
Why should I run from the fact that you just refuted one of your major arguments- that location doesn’t matter?
Location is life or death for you!
Thanks for sharing honestly. It’s step one on the road to recovery.
Keep running Slob. We expect nothing less from you.
What are their commute times ??
Depends on the time of day and where in Silicon Valley you may be headed….The nightmare hours coming in are between 7:30-10:00…Going back from 3:30-7:00…
If you are commuting to lets say, central San Jose, you are coming from Manteca and your coming & going at the worst time its 2+ hours each way…Thats assuming no accidents…
If you can work around the bad hours somehow, its more like 1 hour..
Still brutal. I watched my dad commute for 45-60 minutes each way for 40 years…on bad days it would stretch to 1:30 or 2 hours. For a while he took the bus, sometimes he managed a vanpool from others who had the same commute.
Still a hassle, and a giant pain in the butt.
HOWEVER, that was a time when there was no such thing as the internet, and when he was home, he was not at work (with few exceptions).
And there is no way that my parents could have afforded to own 3 acres closer to where he worked.
Today, if you are talking about simply commuting to be able to own a home with similar characteristics as if you were renting close by, and despite the commute, you still can’t “shut it off” when you get home each day, I can’t say the commute is worth it to “own” your home…
Hmmm, followup on China’s ghost cities…
http://www.businessinsider.com/revisiting-chinas-ghost-cities-2013-9
Never mind about that, as HSBC sez that China’s industrial production index is back above 50.
Bloomberg News
China Manufacturing Gauge Increases to Six-Month High
By Bloomberg News September 23, 2013
Boeing Composites Tianjin Plant
An employee works on producing parts for Boeing Co. airplanes at the Boeing Composites Tianjin Co. Ltd. plant in Tianjin. Photographer: Nelson Ching/Bloomberg
A Chinese manufacturing index (SHCOMP) rose to a six-month high in September, signaling that a rebound in the world’s second-largest economy is gaining steam.
The preliminary reading of 51.2 for a Purchasing Managers’ Index released today by HSBC Holdings Plc and Markit Economics compared with a 50.9 median estimate from 14 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The gauge was at 50.1 in August. A euro-area manufacturing and services gauge rose more than estimated this month, a separate Markit report showed today.
…
Your kewl new gold i-phone is covered in blood
Wall Street Journal - Foxconn Says 11 Injured in Large-Scale Fight at Chinese Campus:
“Foxconn Technology Co. said a large-scale fight that broke out last week at one of its campuses injured 11 people, the latest in a series of violent confrontations among the company’s workers that follows a summer of heightened unrest at Chinese factories.
The violence at the Foxconn plant followed a similar, though much larger-scale, fight last year at another facility in which a fight between two drunken workers escalated into unrest involving about 2,000 workers.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303759604579092641376933788.html
Commie brown people are getting uppity:
“The workers, demonstrating for a third day, pelted factories with bricks and blocked a highway, Abdus Salam Murshedy, president of the Exporters Association of Bangladesh, said by phone. Television images showed police using tear gas on workers, some of whom set fire to a factory warehouse.
The protesters demanded a minimum monthly salary of 8,114 taka ($104), up from 3,000 taka now, Murshedy said as he headed into a meeting with government officials.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-23/two-hundred-bangladesh-factories-shut-on-labor-unrest.html
Here’s a “victim” who used to make six figures but didn’t save enough for retirement. How many millions of baby boomers will follow this path?
“About 7.2 million Americans who were 65 and older were employed last year, a 67 percent increase from a decade ago, according to government data. Yet 59 percent of households headed by people 65 and older currently have no retirement account assets
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-23/why-100-000-salary-may-yield-retirement-flipping-burgers.html
Palome, He receives $1,200 from Social Security and a $600 a month pension from his last corporate job.
================================================
He’s 77. He had a pension through most of his career and it pays $600 a month. That’s only a little more than the median 401k pays ($4800 a year). Hope he enjoys water and rice.
Not even that if he owns a housing anywhere in a union goon state.
And that is assuming he has a fully paid off house.
Property taxes alone in/around anywhere near NYC/Boston/Hartford/Upstate NY/RI for a nothing special crack shack is going to cost $13,000/year.
Minimum $13k.
Sometimes I like a little rice with my Ribeye steak. The taxes on my dock are only about $50/year.
You have to play to win they say. The reverse is more true.
The taxes on my dock are only about $50/year.
Don’t you pay taxes on that house that you bought recently?
Sure. You remember that it is a cheap hobby studio? If I boasted about that as if it were my residence, it would still make my point about staying out of the game the majority are playing.
it would still make my point about staying out of the game the majority are playing.
Dude, you bought. You bought at today’s absurdly high prices.
Prepare for losses from which you will never recover.
Slob,
He paid $20/sq ft for it.
He paid $20/sq ft for it.
Of course, he claims it’s just a shed. So maybe you’re right for once.
We’re always right Slob.
The subject of this story has a paid off house and paid his kids’ educations in full. That alone is a decent chunk of change especially if his kids went to better schools. I’d love to know what schools they went to and what their current income is. I hope they’re thankful for what their Dad and perhaps mother too has done and is still doing for them.
He struck me as very similar to my Dad who never really retired. I think not working would have killed him. He was self employed, a workaholic for his entire career, and always in perpetual motion. It took a surprise brain tumor to take him out at the tender age of 70. Doctors discovered it just weeks before he passed. It was the size of his fist. He wasn’t rolling in the dough at the end but I think he lived well and more importantly the way he wanted to.
He wasn’t rolling in the dough at the end but I think he lived well and more importantly the way he wanted to.
Sorry to hear that, CarrieAnne. On the other hand your father didn’t linger and cause the family a bunch of grief and palliative work, and he earned your respect.
The subject of this story has a paid off house and paid his kids’ educations in full.
He also sold his house and gave much of the proceeds to his kids, as an early inheritance.
“He also sold his house and gave much of the proceeds to his kids, as an early inheritance.”
+1 Courageous too.
Liberace,
How did your harpsichord sound in the ravens lockerroom last nite? Were you able to tune out the echo?
So long as the housing market rally continues, why does this story matter one iota?
The Fed Archives
Sept. 23, 2013, 10:11 a.m. EDT
Fed’s Lockhart, Dudley downbeat on outlook
Economy may have lost ‘mojo,’ says Atlanta Fed president
By Greg Robb, MarketWatch
Reuters
Dennis Lockhart, who heads the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and is shown at right with his Chicago Fed counterpart, Charles Evans, suggests there is evidence that the U.S. economy has lost steam.
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Two senior Federal Reserve officials speaking Monday expressed disappointment with the pace of the U.S. recovery, with one, Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart, saying the economy may have lost dynamism.
“Is America losing its economic mojo?” Lockhart asked in a speech in New York to a summit on creative leadership sponsored by the Louise Blouin Foundation. “There is some evidence to the affirmative.”
…
You have to wonder if the end of Citi consultant Summers’ Fed Chair appointment prospects is contributing to the decline in Citi shares?
Bulletin New index components Goldman, Nike, Visa all contributing to Dow 30 decline »
Sept. 23, 2013, 10:10 a.m. EDT
Citi falls sharply, weighing on financial stocks
By Sital S. Patel
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Financial stocks fell on Monday on reports of a possible drop-off in bank trading revenue ahead of third-quarter earnings.
…
Here is something “most” have agreed on for as long as I have been paying attention (well over a decade already!).
Watch for the phase-out of direct welfare payments to get offset by an increase in stealth welfare payments to farmers (e.g. subsidized crop insurance).
Most Agree ‘Welfare For Farmers’ Has To Go
by Frank Morris
September 23, 2013 4:00 AM
4 min 30 sec
The farm bill which Congress is bitterly divided over is set to expire at the end of this month. Included in it is the $5 billion a year subsidy called Direct and Counter-cyclical Payment Program. It shells out money to farmers and land owners regardless of need or loss.
I wonder how quickly the corporate farm bubble will collapse once that happens.
Relax, the farm subsidies are baked in by both Democrats and Republicansfrom the mid-West.
Paying politicians with a portion of the proceeds, to ensure they keep funneling public money to the donor, has been an excellent investment for Wall Street as well.
A less flattering term for it is “kickback.”
“Paying politicians with a portion of the proceeds, to ensure they keep funneling public money to the donor, has been an excellent investment for Wall Street as well.”
+1 That’s the Israel lobby’s secret recipe.
Inventory is down down down and rents are going up up up
Displaced residents encountering tightest rental market in 13 years:
http://www.dailycamera.com/topbusinessstories/ci_24148291/boulder-county-flood-victims-facing-housing-crunch
Remember when Obama promised that you could keep your doctor under Obamacare?
“With insurance marketplaces set to open next month under the new health care law, consumers may find that insurers have limited their options for doctors and hospitals”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/23/health/lower-health-insurance-premiums-to-come-at-cost-of-fewer-choices.html?pagewanted=all
Quantitative Easing Worked For The Weimar Republic For A Little While Too
There is a reason why every fiat currency in the history of the world has eventually failed. At some point, those issuing fiat currencies always find themselves giving in to the temptation to wildly print more money…
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/quantitative-easing-worked-for-the-weimar-republic-for-a-little-while-too
I think that they always believe that later on they can close the spigot.
‘Every day, 22 veterans take their own lives. That’s a suicide every 65 minutes. As shocking as the number is, it may actually be higher.’
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/21/us/22-veteran-suicides-a-day/index.html
Between the vets killing themselves, and the mass shooters, one would think that maybe politicians would take the lead on introducing some legislation that addresses both mental health and firearms background checks. They are supposed to be legislators and policymakers, not just fundraisers.
On the one hand there is the zero-firearms crowd who, erroneously in my opinion, think that removing all firearms is the answer. On the other, there is the arms industry which is overwhelming focused on profit, and who frankly don’t really care what people do with the armaments they manufacture.
With our broken campaign finance system, and those who are in power because of it, it seems like an uphill battle. A 20-to-1 spending advantage by gun-rights groups underscores that, with ineffectual legislation introduced for political theater. But one worth fighting.
A reform of both the mental health system and firearms regulation. So when a bill is introduced and we ask, “How would this have prevented Sandy Hook? Or Navy Yard? Or Virginia Tech? Or veteran suicides?”, we’ll actually have an answer that says, “Wow, this actually would prevent and/or mitigate those situations.”
We could start by not using the military so often. And sending arms to Al Qaeda might get a few people killed, right?
Here in the US, I suggest a different view. Recently people legally bought millions of guns and every bit of ammo that could be produced for months. They did this because they fear their own government. A government that spies on us, sees itself above the laws we must live under, shovels money into the richest hands. Maybe if they would ratchet down the growing police state, people out here in the sticks wouldn’t be so nervous.
So, we are sure these Vets used firearms in their suicides? And if firearms were not available, there would be no other way to do it? Not jumping off a bridge or tall structure, not overdosing on Oxycontin or some other prescription drug? Or simply putting a plastic grocery bag over the head and sealing it off with duct tape, or cutting wrists? Or maybe charging at a cop with a baseball bat?
Good on ya, Ben! The solution is stay the hell out of foreign civil wars and bring ‘em all home. The days of providing a “Strong National Offense” for the benefit of the MIC are over. Feinstein and McCain and the other psycho’s can just get their slush fund money from somewhere else.
Hopefully, this recent rejection of another US created drone blitz on some hapless ME nation, in the interest of creating maximum blowback, has made a point among even the Nobel Peacenicks, that the public is growing tired of empire. Now, if people only understood the other costs involved as well, they might begin to understand that Bastiat was on to something when he penned the “Broken Window Fallacy.”
I know this is going to sound callous, us being so evolved and all, but has it occurred to anyone else that we are organic species that must obey that laws of nature one way or another? Could suicides, mass shootings, etc. just be humans instinctual attempt at thinning the herd since we’ve done such a good job at keeping ourselves alive? We are running out of resources and our population numbers are not sustainable. Something has to give.
While we’re being callous, keep in mind how statistically small the number of people being affected by mass shootings is. But they certainly are exciting to report on.
“The ethologist John B. Calhoun coined the term “behavioral sink” to describe the collapse in behavior which resulted from overcrowding.
Calhoun’s work became an animal model of societal collapse, and his study became a touchstone of urban sociology and psychology in general.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
We are running out of resources and our population numbers are not sustainable.
this is wrong and really dangerous thinking. it attempts to justify things like ethnic cleansing. i know you’re not trying to justify it, i’m just giving an example.
when we start to run out of one resource, like oil, there will be others to take it’s place. enough food can be grown within a city to feed the entire city with the right technology. population isn’t the problem. we need big populations to do great things. the less people there are (working) the less we are able to do. the less wealth we create.
ted turner would like to cull a large percentage of the population. the pompous self-righteous jerk should go first.
“ted turner would like to cull a large percentage of the population.”
Whoever proposes a culling should also volunteer to be the first to fall on his sword.
@tj,
Yes, and if the day comes that populations need culling, let it be by natural selection, and not government induced! Seems governments always make the wrong choices, can’t imagine putting them in charge of more genocides.
“…can’t imagine putting them in charge of more genocides.”
Hitler imagined it.
“housing will make you poor. Real poor”
It certainly does at current massively inflated asking prices of resale housing considering prices are 250% higher than long term trend. If you buy a house in this environment, you’ll be deep in debt for the rest of your life.
Don’t do it.
Hey 2Ban, this is your boy-savior Ted Cruz… He wouldn’t even study with “lower Ivy” grads when he was in law school. Imagine what words he’d have for you. ROFL.
—————————
“The elite academic circles that Cruz was now traveling in began to rub off. As a law student at Harvard, he refused to study with anyone who hadn’t been an undergrad at Harvard, Princeton, or Yale. Says Damon Watson, one of Cruz’s law-school roommates: “He said he didn’t want anybody from ‘minor Ivies’ like Penn or Brown.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/in-law-school-ted-cruz-only-studied-with-students-from-harvard-princeton-or-yale
More proof Ted Cruz is an @$$hole:
“It’s hard for Ted Cruz to be humble. Part of the challenge stems from his résumé, which the Texas senator wears like a sandwich board. There’s the Princeton class ring that’s always on his right hand and the crimson gown that, as a graduate of Harvard Law School, he donned when called upon to give a commencement speech earlier this year. (Cruz’s fellow Harvard Law alums Barack Obama and Mitt Romney typically perform their graduation duties in whatever robes they’re given.) ”
Read More http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201310/ted-cruz-republican-senator-october-2013#ixzz2fjPqcO6A
‘Cruz’s fellow Harvard Law alums Barack Obama and Mitt Romney’
Don’t forget the skull and bones Yalies, Bush and Kerry. Interesting how our political system is dominated by silver spoon/lawyer types who traipse off to eastern ‘elite’ schools to get some cred.
Speaking of eastern elite university street cred:
“Harvard University set a goal to raise a record $6.5 billion by 2018 to boost education and research and carry out construction projects across the campus.
Harvard has already received $2.8 billion in donations and pledges toward its goal in the past two years, during what’s referred to as a “quiet phase,” Tamara Rogers, vice president for alumni affairs and development, said in an interview. ”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-21/harvard-fundraising-effort-aims-for-record-6-5-billion-by-2018.html
More than anyone I knew, Ted seemed to have arrived in college with a fully formed worldview,” [Princeton] colleague Erik Leitch said. “And what strikes me now, looking at him as an adult and hearing the things he’s saying, it seems like nothing has changed. Four years of an Ivy League education, Harvard Law, and years of life experience have altered nothing.”
While Cruz’s friends from the debate team foresaw a successful career in politics for Cruz, many of the Princeton alums offered that they were deeply troubled by the possibility of Cruz running for president, a notion that one, who did not want to be quoted speaking against a former classmate who is now a senator, called notion “horrifying.”
Craig Mazin said he knew some people might be afraid to speak in the press about a senator, but added of Cruz, “We should be afraid that someone like that has power.”
And the idea that his freshman roommate could someday be the leader of the free world? “I would rather have anybody else be the president of the United States. Anyone,” Mazin said. “I would rather pick somebody from the phone book.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/19/ted-cruz-at-princeton-creepy-sometimes-well-liked-and-exactly-the-same.html
the idea that his freshman roommate could someday be the leader of the free world? “I would rather have anybody else be the president of the United States. Anyone,”
Sounds like the GOPsters have another winner.
“Never fall in love with a Politician. They’ll break your heart every time.”
Lee Rodgers
Demonstrating an overall decline in casual dining, Darden Restaurants on Friday reported first-quarter earnings that were much lower than expected. It also announced major cuts, including job eliminations, Reuters reported.
Darden’s holdings include the Olive Garden and Red Lobster chains.
“Darden in the most recent month was a little bit ahead of the industry, so it is a broader industry problem,” Jeffrey Bernstein, senior restaurant analyst with Barclays, told CNBC.
In a conference call today, CEO Clarence Otis said Darden would cut costs by $25 million in the current fiscal year and $50 million in 2015, including laying off 85 support staff members, according to Reuters. Otis had stated in a release earlier that the sluggish recovery would continue to affect restaurant sales.
Matthew DiFrisco, director and senior restaurant analyst at Lazard Capital Markets, told CNBC that the decline of middle-class casual dining could be connected to an unstable housing market.
“I think with the volatility of the mortgage rates and also the frugalness of the consumer that [the] sector’s very discretionary, and you saw some contraction there,” DiFrisco said.
‘the decline of middle-class casual dining could be connected to an unstable housing market’
It’s difficult to find the bucks for a bottomless pasta bowl when you are spending all your time and money wrestling an alligator.
And we have our very own blog DebtDonkey who is up to his ass in alligator(S)…….
On the one hand, the timing of my short on the stock market doesn’t matter, since most of my shares were sold in July by someone who broke into my account. On the other hand, I think I must be crazy because the market literally appears to be crashing ever since the day after I was GOING to sell my shorts. This is why I hate stocks so much. I wish I could buy low-priced houses and rent them out for income. That would be so much less risky.
Interesting but unrelated to housing: Ben Jealous (head of the NAACP) is 1/4 black and has a Columbia UG/Oxford grad school pedigree. Also went to a fancy private HS in Monterrey, CA.
Here’s his bio from wikipedia:
———————————
“Jealous was born in Pacific Grove, California and grew up in Monterey Peninsula, California. He holds a B.A. in political science from Columbia University and a master’s degree in comparative social research from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar. Jealous went to York School in Monterey for high school.
His mother, Ann Todd Jealous, who is black, is a retired psychotherapist from Baltimore, Maryland who participated in Western High School’s desegregation.[3] She is also the author, with Caroline Haskell, of Combined Destinies: Whites Sharing Grief about Racism, released in April 2013.[3] His father, Fred Jealous, who is white, from New England, is the Founder and President of the Breakthrough Men’s Community and participated in Baltimore sit-ins to desegregate lunch counters.[3] As a multiracial couple, it was illegal for them to get married in Maryland until 1967; therefore, they had to marry in Washington before returning to Baltimore.[4] Afterward, Jealous’ father was disowned by his white family from New England.[4]“
Liberace has entered the building!
Also worth pointing out that Jealous’ half-black mom went to Western HS in Baltimore, which is an all-girls public school in the city and one of the 2 or 3 hardest HS’s to get accepted into. It also shares a campus with Polytech which is the best HS in the city. So it’s not like she was really around black people that much either. She was “desegregating the school”, so it was all white when she went. And she herself was only 1/2 black.
LOL @ this guy being the leader of the NAACP. 1/4 black and from a background better than 99.9% of Americans is apparently what you need to lead the NAACP “in the struggle”.
I’m noticing a pattern with your three obsessions, Joe.
Yeah… darryl, darryl and darryl.
Is the taper on or off the table?
Is this good or bad news for stocks?
The Fed Archives
Sept. 23, 2013, 1:53 p.m. EDT
Fed’s Dudley says economy too weak to taper
…
Bernanke’s Kryptonite = DEFLATION
September 20, 2013 5:18 pm
Fed reveals weak spot in superhero powers
By Ralph Atkins in London and Michael MacKenzie in New York
Superman had issues with Kryptonite. For Achilles, it was his heel. With central bankers, is it communicating with markets?
The US Federal Reserve startled investors round the globe this week by deciding not to start scaling back its $85bn a month of asset purchases, or quantitative easing.
Bond and share prices jumped sharply on the prospect of unexpectedly undiminished Fed largesse. But even as they pocketed gains, investors wondered if they had misunderstood Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman. Based on hints dropped since May, the consensus view had been for a $10bn to $15bn reduction in the pace of purchases.
Central banks have sought to increase the effectiveness of their communication during the years of financial crisis. By extending their influence over markets’ expectations of future interest rates, they hope to leverage their superhero powers. But the Fed’s last minute hesitation was a reality check.
“It does raise the question of whether markets will believe the Fed in the future as much as they have in the past,” says Huw Pill, head of European economics at Goldman Sachs. “Why bother with transparency when you can – and do – change your mind,” asks Tom Di Galoma, co-head of rates trading at ED&F Man.
US 10-year Treasury yields, which had hit 3 per cent earlier this month, fell below 2.7 per cent after the Fed’s announcement. The FTSE All-World share index ended the week up more than 2 per cent, while the US S&P 500 reached a fresh record on Thursday.
“It is not so much an Achilles heel but the fact is that the Fed is really driving market prices – and so even subtle shifts in the way the Fed is appraising the situation can make a big difference,” says Julian Callow, international economist at Barclays.
…
Itchbyitch,
Are Realtors liars?
Housing Analyst Raises Concerns of Artificial Price Appreciation
“Home price appreciation has been so rampant, particularly in California and Florida, that flippers and get-rich-quick scam artists are flourishing again,” said Chris Cagan, VP at John Burns. “Just as in the mania of 2004-06, flippers make money when the party is raging, but inevitably,” SOMEONE LOSES WHEN THE PARTY IS BUSTED”.
http://www.dsnews.com/articles/analyst-warns-of-artificial-appreciation-2013-09-20
Bears will growl.
Roubini bearish on gold, but optimistic about U.S. and Japanese stocks
September 23, 2013, 3:01 PM
Prominent economist Nouriel Roubini, who is known as “Dr. Doom,” on Monday offered a negative take on gold and certain emerging markets, along with kind words for U.S. and Japanese stocks and the dollar.
“Why are we bearish on gold? Several reasons,” he said while delivering the keynote address at IndexUniverse’s Inside Commodities Conference in New York.
Roubini said tail risks for the global economy have declined and that’s hurt demand for the metal often seen as a safe haven. In addition, gold will be pressured by a strengthening dollar and real interests rates going higher, said the economist, who is known for his generally gloomy views.
In response to a question on areas where he’s more optimistic, Roubini suggested overweighting equities vs. bonds, and within equities, focusing on advanced economies rather than emerging markets — in particular U.S. and Japanese equities rather than European or U.K. stocks.
Roubini was gloomy on commodities in general, saying the “commodity supercycle” is likely over.
“Most commodity prices over the next couple of years are going to be lower rather than higher,” he said. Roubini cited Chinese growth slowing and becoming less resource-intensive, plus the Federal Reserve starting to wind down its stimulus measures. As he did with gold in particular, he also cited higher interest rates and a strengthening dollar, adding that “dollar doomsday folks” are wrong. The U.S. has advantages over other developed nations with its demographics and technology, he said.
Another area to be gloomy? Certain emerging markets with current account deficits and other challenges. Roubini said he’s concerned about nations such as Indonesia, India, Brazil, Turkey and the Ukraine.
…
Precious metals and cash - both! They look very attractive. Good deal to hold for at least 6 years The longer the better. PRPFX versus a 4% commission fee on gold bullion wins in less than 6 years but is a loser after that. The .69 (at least) expense ratio is the killer of PRPFX. Also physical gold and cash are movable and hidable. Hillary will be president in January 2017. She will confiscate 10% of the low hanging fruit: electronic assets. She will take that long before she confiscates our stash of precious metals and fiat currency (under the mattress).
Ha ha ha!
I just found out that my dear late aunt left me a canal-front lot in Port St. Lucie FL and I thought that I’d let y’all know so that you would keep me from getting too excited about it.
Turns out that a quick look at Zillow did that quite well!
In my next life, I plan to have a generous rich aunt.
She was a wonderful aunt. A single woman, she was always wonderful and encouraging to all her nieces and nephews. She’s much missed.
I don’t have as much good to say about FL real estate. I am guessing that she paid $10,000 for each of 2 lots (one went to me and one to my brother) around 35 years ago.
Mine is worth a bit over $7,000 and brother’s a bit over $8,000. The property taxes she paid in the last 10 years on mine is over $7,000.
The subdivision does not appear to have a bright future.
Good thing real estate always goes up.
” so that you would keep me from getting too excited about it.”
Two words: flood insurance
Is Zilker park in Chicago? If so you need a snowbird escape. It might be worth $700/year.
Ask Blueskye how to put a trailer home on pontoons. Whatever you do don’t put yourself in a position to have to pay for insurance.
We’re in Austin! A trailer home on pontoons sounds cool, but we’d rather do it on the Gulf Coast of Texas.
I don’t think that my aunt ever had those lots mowed or trees trimmed. (I hope that’s not what put the subdivision on its path to decline.)
I think that there might be some value there in alligator and snake skins.
Well, my kids have a single aunt who is gainfully employed. Perhaps I could gently suggest she invest in some FL land, once the housing market finally bottoms out. Who knows — maybe she will leave some real estate to my kids?
P.S. Said “aunt” to my kids (also my sister) used to own an SFR within walking distance of Barton Springs Pool. I bet she would be alot richer at the moment if she had rented that place out instead of selling before moving to CO in the late 1990s — ALOT!
She would be.
If she saw what it’s like in this area now - 1st she would be saddened by the decline in quality of life - pecan-surrounded RV parks on Barton Springs Rd and the less charming auto-related businesses on S. Lamar being replaced by canyons surrounded by monolithic so-called “luxury apartment” complexes with retail, restaurants, and bars supposedly underneath - while places you can get a nice-priced sandwich or buy anything remotely useful move far to the south, undermining the once-great walkability factor. 10,000 “luxury” apartments within a few miles of us (our house is closer to Lamar than to Barton Springs).
Isn’t it great how much the RE racket learned from the luxury condo boom that busted - leading to the trailer park food courts on the denuded building sites. You’ve seen them on the
Food and Travel channels - thanks to our property taxes paying for Austin-promoting PR. But the food trailers are fast being moved off for the luxury apartments. ($1500 min rent. And to be converted to “luxury” condos after the recovery from the luxury apartment bust, when?
Zilker Park (the north side, not the pool side) is closed to the public. They’re preparing for two weeks of ACL and it takes weeks to prepare and weeks to recover (C3 productions - the Lollapalooza organ - gives the city money to rejuvenate the parks. Then they close them for events. It will be partially closed for the holidays for new longer weeks of Trail of Lights.
And I won’t even start on the noise, the traffic, the construction entrances, and the streets both residential and arterial torn up to provide additional infrastructure.
Than after she mourns the loss of quality of life in a place that was really nice, she would wish she hadn’t sold that house until maybe now (or before the next bust anyway). The lost educational funds or sports cars for your kids…
But hey, she could make up for your kids’ lost educational opportunities or sports cars.
Perhaps she would be interested in a couple of lots on a canal in Port St. Lucie with great potential.
Has she always wanted her own line of exotic handbags? Wanted to open a food trailer serving alligator burgers and hot snake dogs? We might be able to cut a deal.
My uncle had a lot or two in some state (not Arizona and not California). After his death I was so involved in consulting that I could not keep up. Stopped paying property taxes on it in 2000. I don’t care if the state took the lots. Hope it did, and hope for a good cause. The place was not mucking fuch anyway.
In my next life, I plan to have a generous rich aunt.
My fortune teller told me I will have a generous rich ant. I was so happy until she put it in writing.
Don’t be a chump for a sump-pump
The list of good reasons to buy a home includes the desire to put down roots, the freedom to pick your own wallpaper, or even the urge to finally discover what a sump is, and why it needs pumping.
But nowhere on the list will you find “to beat rising mortgage rates” as a reason to rush out and buy a house.
Unless you’re considering that place down the street where the renters never clean up the yard. In that case, you should buy tomorrow and keep the neighborhood beautiful by either hiring a lawn service or renting to a sorority for supermodels.
Not exactly a case of mee-ouch!
To hear some people talk, anyone who doesn’t buy a house yesterday is losing out big time, because mortgage rates have climbed by nearly a full percentage point during the last 12 months. This indeed could be a panic-inducing financial development if it weren’t for the fact that mortgages are cheaper now than they were during World War II, a time when the housing market was depressed because home buyers feared they’d have to learn the German phrase for “closing costs.”
So how much of a hit has a prospective homeowner taken since last year? Rates went from an average of 3.6 percent to 4.5 percent, meaning that on a $100,000 loan, your monthly payment has gone up $52.04. That’s a real budget-buster, being about what the average American spends on caring for the family cat.
(I won’t say you can overcome the slight increase in cost of home ownership by ditching your cat, but let’s note that you don’t get much equity out of Fluffy’s hairballs, either.)
Over the life of a 30-year loan, that $52 will increase your total interest cost by nearly $19,000. Contrast that to rates in 2005 at the peak of the housing bubble, when a 30-year loan averaged 5.87 percent. People couldn’t grab mortgages fast enough then, even though the total interest cost at that rate was more than $30,000 higher.
No house of pain, please
The time to buy a house is when you can afford it, including down payment, fees, insurance, taxes, moving costs and upkeep. You also should be able to stay put for five years to recoup your purchase costs.
If mortgage rates go up, you can buy a less expensive property, put more money down, buy down your mortgage rate by paying points, or work out some combination of all of those. For example, borrowing $90,000 instead of $100,000 at 4.5 percent would keep your monthly payment the same as borrowing $100,000 at last year’s rate.
Don’t let the overwhelming desire to grab a home, sweet home mortgage rate sour your finances. Buy what you can afford when you’re ready, and you, too, can enjoy years of happy sump pumping.
The whole interest rate selling point is a total joke, because:
• High interest rate x low price = Monthly Payment X
• Low interest rate x high price = Monthly Payment X
X is identical.
The system attempts to maximize that monthly payment. The interest payment is really what the house purchaser is buying.
House prices will vary with interest rates to reach that maximum target monthly payment.
Times are even worse in Detroit than we thought, from today’s Detnews:
Apparently the city has gone to the dogs.
Four animal control officers, 30,000 abandoned homes, and 50,000 stray dogs; what could possibly go wrong?
Detroit Has Many Strays, But ‘We’re Not Tripping Over Dogs’
September 23, 2013 2:01 PM
4 min 15 sec
A stray dog in Detroit last week.
Carlos Osorio/AP
While there’s a serious dog problem in Detroit, the initial results of an effort to count the number of homeless canines in the city indicate there are far fewer than that some news accounts have talked about.
“We’re not seeing mass numbers; we’re not tripping over dogs in the streets that are biting us and chasing us,” Tom McPhee, filmmaker and Executive Director of the , tells MLive.
He adds that “Detroit has problems — we just think it’s a bit much that Detroit is being jumped on with this idea whole that there are 50,000 stray dogs and they’re biting and hurting and its a vicious situation. In terms of actual, what we call actual, stray dogs, the number is demonstrably different than 50,000 number that’s being published.”
Just how much different the American Strays census concludes the number really is should be known in several weeks.
The project also aims to put GPS tracking collars on 50 of the strays, to keep tabs on where they go. Many dogs are known to live in some of the estimated 30,000 abandoned homes in the city.
Quinn Klinefelter of NPR member station WDET tells our friends at All Things Considered that even if the stray count ends up being much less than the 50,000 figure, the city still has a huge problem. Its three authorized shelters take in 15,000 stray dogs a year, he reports, and can’t cope with an influx of strays.
What’s more, “cash-strapped animal control department has only four active officers — a fifth is recovering from being mauled in a kennel,” Quinn says.
…
Apparently Detroit is not the only spot in the U.S. with dog issues. Pretty much wherever pit bulls are owned or bred, anyone who crosses paths with them is exposed to the risk of attack.
COLTON: Child, 2, dies in apparent dog mauling
September 23, 2013 by Richard Brooks
An apparent dog-mauling killed a 2-year-old child in Colton, police say.
The attack was reported at 5:32 p.m. along the 700 block of West Citrus Avenue in Colton.
Officers found the youngster suffering from extensive upper body injuries. The child died at a nearby hospital.
Animal control officers took custody of what police described as five mixed-breed pit bulls.
Police were conducting interviews and released no details of the circumstances of the attack.
The child’s name also was not released.
Jain = Sikh version of ‘Smith’
siliconindia Real Estate
eal Estate >> News
Salaried Real Estate Investors In Mess As Loan Cost Pinches
By PTI | Monday, September 23, 2013
Mumbai: The deepening economic slowdown, rising cost of living and low wage revisions, coupled with higher interest rares, are forcing salaried professionals who had earlier invested in properties to put them up for sale, say industry experts.
People who had invested in properties some 10-15 years ago are now finding it difficult to service their home loans which have become too expensive now due to the rising interest rates and falling rental yields.
According to a survey, resale inventory has increased nearly 30 per cent over the last six months.
“Economic slowdown has hit the real estate industry. Salaried professionals who had invested in properties five-six years ago to cash in on the boom, are now looking to sell them as they are finding it difficult to cope with the high cost of living,” property portal Housing.co.in co-founder and marketing head Advitiya Sharma told PTI.
He said the resale market is currently dominated by young professionals and the high cash inflows that the sector gets, has made it a lucrative field.
“In the current economic conditions, finding a tenant with higher rents has become more challenging as people have become cautious due to uncertain economic conditions and are thus opting for properties with similar or lower rents,” DTZ India chief executive Anshul Jain said.
Primary buyers are willing to deal in the resale sector than new homes due to the risks involved in new projects, said Shashank Jain, executive director, PricewaterhouseCoopers.
“Such resale inventory is mainly concentrated in large metro cities. Buyers are looking at such opportunities as they get closer to possession prices and do not have to worry about risks involved in new projects. On the other hand, sellers benefit as they can get higher returns on their investment, than settling for low rental yields,” he said.
Jain further mentioned that this situation will, however, not attract investors.
“Such deals will attract primary buyers. But people who are looking at investing in properties at this moment, may not consider this option,” he added.
…
Rising interest rates could impact real estate recovery, survey says
By Josh Salman
Published: Thursday, September 12, 2013 at 11:32 p.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, September 12, 2013 at 11:32 p.m.
Climbing interest rates could weaken Florida’s brisk housing recovery, especially among middle-class families and first-time homebuyers, a new University of Florida survey concludes.
But real estate experts in Southwest Florida have suggested this region should escape the brunt of the impact because nearly two-thirds of all buyers pay cash for residences here.
The university’s review found the general investment outlook for all sectors of the market declined for the first time in two years in the second quarter ended June 30.
The survey of 145 real estate analysts, investors and brokers shows optimism from previous quarters has waned — and will continue to weaken if mortgage rates rise.
“There are a lot of deals being done right now. That’s why the market has really picked up,” Timothy Becker, director of UF’s Bergstrom Center for Real Estate Studies, said in a statement. “But as those interest rates start to tick up and if they continue at this pace, it’s going to get to the point where it’s difficult to make deals work at the current rates.”
…
I have to check on that long-term Treasury mutual fund I snapped up a couple of months back. If the stock market correction gathers steam, it could do quite nicely!
U.S. ECONOMICS: Treasury Yields Continue to Fall on Fed Comments
By MT Newswires, September 23, 2013, 12:28:30 PM EDT
U.S. Treasury yields are declining today after remarks from Fed Presidents Dudley and Lockhart advocating easy monetary policy to support a still struggling economy.
Both indicated that there are enough headwinds to the recovery to necessitate a continuation of the $85 billion in asset purchases the Fed conducts each month to keep interest rates low and provide adequate liquidity to the financial markets. Their remarks support the FOMC’s decision to keep QE unchanged at their last meeting and have eased worries of an October tapering mentioned by Bullard and George late last week.
At midday, the 10 year note is trading at a 2.71% yield, 3 basis points lower than Friday. The long bond is at 3.74%, 2 basis points lower. The yield curve has flattened 3 basis points to 238 bps.
…
I throw $100 monthly into the high yield corporate bond fund VWESX. I rarely ever sell stock mutual funds. I rarely ever put large lump sums into them. But when I need the cash I sell my biggest winner. If I have cash and need to save it somewhere I buy a big lump sum of my biggest loser.
Have put $1000 into VWESX a month ago - lump sum.
The American Dream - The Story of Your Enslavement
http://www.knowledgeoftoday.org/2012/01/american-dream-with-international.html
Housing “Recovery” Endgame Escalates
“Och-Ziff were perhaps a little early but used the last 10 months to unwind their real estate and exit the landlord business as the hedge-fund sponsored echo-bubble in housing rolled over into the mainstream.”
“Oaktree, which specializes in distressed investing, and Carrington had initially planned on converting their portfolio into a real estate investment trust. But investors have now decided to simply exit the trade. Their asking price for the portfolio could not be learned.”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-23/housing-recovery-endgame-escalates
“hedge-fund sponsored echo-bubble”
Nicely struck!
Poh Eddie…poh, poh Eddie…
Atlanta Housing Market Slowdown on its Way
Real Estate Brokerage Redfin Explains why Atlanta’s Hyper Home-Price Growth will Taper or Even Drop by Year End
By Redfin Corporation
Published: Thursday, Sep. 12, 2013 - 6:08 am
ATLANTA, Sept. 12, 2013 — /PRNewswire/ — Redfin (www.redfin.com), the technology-powered real estate brokerage, today released its first-ever in-depth analysis on housing market conditions focusing specifically on the Atlanta metro area. After a year of uncharacteristically steep home-price growth, several factors indicate that the Atlanta housing market can no longer support double-digit growth rates, and the market will most likely see a sustained slowdown by the end of this year.
The report shows:
* Mortgage rate increases priced some buyers out of the market, a likely cause for the dip in August home sales. Rates are likely to continue to rise as the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program winds down. In an August survey, nearly 30% of Redfin buyers looking for a home in Atlanta said that they would “step back” or “stop” their home search if mortgage rates rose above 5%.
* Investors are leaving the market, with the number of homes purchased by firms decreasing from 28% to 23% of sales.
* Sellers are accepting lower prices, with Redfin buyers paying an average of 5% below list price compared to 1% below a year ago.
* New construction will ease inventory shortages. As of July, Atlanta had issued the third largest number of new residential building permits in the country in 2013.
…
Sounds like India is a bit ahead of the U.S. on the next round of global housing bubble collapse.
India’s economic slowdown puts the squeeze on home prices
Rebecca Bundhun
Sep 23, 2013 Updated: Sep 23, 2013 19:10:00
India’s economic slowdown, high inventories of unsold homes and changes in regulations by the central bank, are set to put downward pressure on home prices in major cities, experts say.
Yashwant Dalal, the president of the Estate Agents Association of India, says that rates are set to fall as the festive season approaches. “Prices are on a deep slope and will be tumbling fast,” he says, explaining that property prices in Mumbai have risen to unrealistically high levels.
“The residential real estate demand has been subdued in the recent past with the consumers following a wait-and-watch policy,” according to a report on Mumbai’s property market released this month by Icra, a credit rating firm in India. “With the approvals gradually flowing in, the pace of new launches is expected to increase, thereby leading to increase in supply in the market.
“Going forward, considering the increase in inventory levels, subdued demand scenario with no immediate improvement in sight, and uncertain macro environment, the developers would find it difficult to increase prices. While the announced prices appear to have remained firm in the recent past, there has been a tacit price correction brought around through innovative marketing schemes being offered by developers.”
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently banned banks from issuing loans under the “80:20 scheme”, which through a three-way agreement between the lender, the developer and the homebuyer, allowed the customer to pay 20 per cent upfront, while the remainder of the loan would be issued to the developer, regardless of the stage of construction.
“Several viewpoints have been floated since the RBI announced this ban, largely speculating on a fall in real estate prices as a consequence,” said Ashutosh Limaye, the head of research and real estate intelligence service at Jones Lang LaSalle India. “It has been opined that developers’ holding power will be significantly reduced, forcing them to reduce prices. This analysis of the situation is based on the currently high levels of inventory that developers are saddled with, especially in larger cities like Mumbai, Bangalore and Delhi.
“Indeed, inventory levels in the leading seven cities in India are much higher than the comfortable industry levels seen around eight to 10 months ago, which is between 14-15 months’ worth of unsold supply,” Mr Limaye added.
…
The echo bubble has spread inland to Enid, Oklahoma!
September 23, 2013
Addressing the housing problem
By Robert Barron, Staff Writer Enid News & Eagle
ENID, Okla. — Enid employers are concerned they will be unable to fill vacant jobs, while employees are concerned they will not be able to find proper housing.
Whitney Box, city of Enid director of strategic and long-range planning, outlined concerns raised in a recent housing survey done by Enid Regional Development Alliance.
The price of housing in Enid has risen 34.5 percent since 2005, she said, and there is a critical need for lower-cost housing, or homes priced $150,000 and below. The average sale price of a new home in Enid has risen to $247,000.
…
In GovSpeak, affordable means MORE EXPENSIVE.
Monday, September 23rd, 2013 | Posted by University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization
The Unintended Consequences of Affordable Housing Policy
Honolulu (courtesy of Watchdog.org)
By Carl Bonham for UHERO - Honolulu City Council Resolution 13-168 would amend the percentages of affordable housing units that developers must provide to receive authorization for housing projects. Current city policy requires that 10% of a development’s units must be affordable for households earning no more than 80% of the HUD median income for Honolulu.
Another 10% of units in a development should be affordable for families earning between 80 and 120% of the median income, and 10% for families earning between 120 and 140% of the median income. The resolution proposes that the mix of affordable housing required of developers be reconsidered. The intent is to change the requirements in a way that leads to more affordable housing for those who need it the most.
While requiring developers to set aside a fraction of a project to be sold at below market prices may seem like a reasonable way of dealing with the problem of affordable housing, economic theory and years of experience suggest exactly the opposite. Such requirements, known as inclusionary zoning (IZ), act as a tax on developers with the proceeds used to subsidize housing for gap income households earning between 80 and 140 percent of the median income. But that tax reduces incentives for developers to produce all forms of housing, and will reduce the overall supply of housing units and increase the price of housing.
In 2010, UHERO conducted a comprehensive review of studies that analyzed IZ policies across the United States.1 Approximately 90% of the studies concluded that IZ increases the market price of housing and decreases housing units available in the market. Of the 18 studies that were able to quantify the effect of inclusionary zoning on housing market outcomes, 13 found that IZ policies both increased the market price of housing and decreased housing units available in the market, and three more studies found evidence of at least one of those effects. UHERO’s report concluded that “Inclusionary Zoning policies have failed in other jurisdictions, and are failing on Oahu.” Such policies have not delivered substantial numbers of affordable housing units to households the programs were designed to help.
The undersupply of housing services relative to household formation on Oahu is a chronic problem. While IZ policies are politically appealing, they mistakenly tax housing to encourage more of it! The effect of a tax on the production of any product, housing included, is relatively straightforward. The extra tax imposed by IZ increases the cost to developers and limits the supply of housing provided. Facing the additional cost, developers will build fewer housing units, all else equal. In the worst case scenario, if the expected loss on the affordable units does not allow developers to meet their required rate of return, then projects will never get off the ground. The primary means of insuring the project is viable is to produce more upscale, higher priced homes to offset the loss on the subsidized housing.2 So, the IZ tax not only reduces the overall supply of housing, it also changes the mix of housing by encouraging higher end and more expensive housing developments.
“Low-cost housing is usually produced through a process called filtering where existing housing units drop in cost as their relative quality falls, rather than through construction of new, lower-cost units.” (Feldman, 2002 p. 9) Over time, the existing stock of housing depreciates and declines in quality relative to new amenity rich units. For example, new housing often includes central air-conditioning and energy saving appliances, whereas twenty years ago few housing units would have such amenities.
…
Another day, another drop in the Citigroup share price…
Just think how ugly their business outlook might be if it weren’t for the U.S. housing recovery now underway!
Sept. 23, 2013, 5:18 p.m. EDT
Citigroup to cut 1,000 in mortgage division
By Sital S. Patel
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Citigroup Inc. (C -3.20%) will cut 1,000 jobs in its mortgage business in the U.S., according to a statement by the firm on Monday. The firm is making nationwide cuts after higher interest rates have slowed down its new loans and refinancing business. “In response to decreased demand for mortgage originations and refinancing, CitiMortgage is eliminating some positions in sales, fulfillment, underwriting and mortgage default functions predominantly at Citi sites in Las Vegas, Nevada and Irving, Texas,” said the firm in a statement. The firm’s Las Vegas office will see about 760 cuts, while its Irving, Texas cite will see approximately 100 cuts. The cuts make up about eight percent of the firm’s mortgage division. Citi is the latest firm to announce cuts in its mortgage division following disappointing results. Citigroup shares fell more than 3% in trading on reports of a drop-off in trading revenues.