November 11, 2013

Bits Bucket for November 11, 2013

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

210 Comments »

Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 05:09:24

happy veterans day from the corporate welfare military industrial complex!

http://www.picpaste.com/IMG_20131108_095400_100-VUJaggLH.jpg

Comment by Bring 'Em Home
2013-11-11 06:40:25

Support out troops.

Comment by In Colorado
2013-11-11 08:44:10

A nephew will be leaving the Marine Corps soon. Now he gets to go to the front of the line for FedGov jobs. No burger flipping for him!

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 09:00:32

Front of the line for the sequester. Many older veterans are already parked firmly in those jobs.

Good luck to him though. Hope he gets to see the world and enjoy himself!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2013-11-11 11:25:03

Good luck to him though. Hope he gets to see the world and enjoy himself!

He got to see Afghanistan. I don’t know if he “enjoyed himself”, but the fact that he isn’t signing up for a second tour makes me think that he didn’t.

 
Comment by my failure to respect is unacceptable
2013-11-11 13:03:32

he isn’t signing up for a second tour makes me think that he didn’t.

I have read that first kill is the hard one. You kind of enjoy after that. Your nephew must not have mustered even the first kill. We don’t need the weeklings in our marine.

USA! USA! USA!

 
Comment by SUGuy
2013-11-11 13:56:28

There is something called the Patriot loan which has a very low interest and helps veterans start a business.

 
Comment by jane
2013-11-11 16:42:12

The Corps is a tough place to be these days - they took it on the chin in the military reductions.

My son ended his term of enlistment Summer 2012. He said the Corps was doing everything it could to drum them out fast. Plus, there was little mercy shown to career officers just shy of their retirement marks. Did not sound like happytime.

I’ve been an employee at places that were going through repositionings, restructurings, whatever happy happy you want to call it. Not a pleasant place to be, whether military or civilian.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-11-11 09:50:51

I always opposed preferences or extra points given to military unless they were in active combat….why should as desk jockey get preference?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Steve J
2013-11-11 10:48:34

They already know how to fill out forms in triplicate.

 
 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 10:01:49

I’m not talking about your nephew, but these preferences you speak of — for veterans, for minorities, etc…. they are one of the reasons that the federal workforce is a mess. If highly talented non-veterans apply alongside a below-average qualified vet, they often don’t even make the first cut. They never make it past HR. The way federal hiring works, that is huge. Candidates are screened before the actual agency ever sees them. Someone actual hiring a subordinate can’t really see the type of people applying, they only seen what makes it through after “preferences” are given.

It’s well known among the bid procurement/contract management ranks that the veterans in the fed gov’t ranks are one of the big two “weak links”. Far less capable than the people they go up against. The other weak link is all the shaqueeshas and latishas who end up about 2 levels higher than they would if they were white or asian.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 10:43:15

You only have to go so far as healthcare.gov to see the problem with government contracting.

How likely is it that the best company for the job is also the best company at navigating the system?

How likely is it that the best company for the job would even bother going through the big process, when their likely status is that they have plenty of work already?

 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 11:36:54

To win high profile gov’t contracts you need to know the ins and outs of the procurement process. The people writing the bid proposals have to be A+; the people interacting with the CO have to be A+; your lawyers have to be A+. These are multi-stage procurements and are subject to lots of laws and agency regs.

It’s become all about the game.

 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2013-11-11 12:39:55

Good luck to him. Friend of mine retired over a year ago after 25 years in the Navy and just now got a job. So much for the front of the line.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2013-11-11 12:45:55

“Friend of mine retired over a year ago after 25 years in the Navy and just now got a job. So much for the front of the line.”

The feds usually have plenty of job openings available, but you frequently have to “man-up” and move to it.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-11-11 12:58:17

I know a woman who got an IT job with the USDA, with no experience, just a quick and dirty online MIS degree. She was selected over experienced candidates. Her husband is in the Air Force.

True, not everyone who gets out of the military will get a FedGov job. Some don’t have any skills. Others are too broken.

Also, there is a lot of competition for FedGov jobs. Your friend got one after a year. For most civilians,it can take a lot longer, if they even get one.

Remember those temporary census jobs? My daughter signed up and took the test. From what she told me, unless you got a near perfect score you had no chance as veterans were given plenty of bonus points on the test. She did make it, but only because she aced the test.

 
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 13:30:24

Your nephew came from marine corps. By your reasoning he is a socialist and WILL ALWAYS BE A SOCIALIST even if he votes libertarian from this point forward.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2013-11-11 18:20:23

Colorado was just making up his own definition of the word socialist yesterday. Of course, nearly all of the people who fell in love with that word around 5½ years ago also have their own definition. If he wants, he can use a definition which excludes his nephew.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-11-11 21:30:13

Of course, nearly all of the people who fell in love with that word around 5½ years ago also have their own definition.

+1. Yesterday was very telling. The definition (and rationalization) changes daily. Some days it’s a transfer of wealth from one US citizen to another. Other days, a government takeover of private corporations or industry. Any others? And I can’t speak for InCo but I don’t think he was excusing his nephew; I think he’s wondering why certain people on here think they can excuse themselves.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 07:07:53

“Remember what I told you? Debt is bondage”~Suze Orman, November 09, 2013

 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 07:42:28

Most of what our military does = things the founders would’ve considered treasonous and antithetical to a strong, just, and enlightened nation worthy of defending.

We should celebrate people who work for justice, not sheep who sign up to fight the ridiculous and disgraceful types of wars we’ve had since WWII.

(BTW, hi private contractor reading my messages from Ft Meade. I’ll wave at you when I pass the you on the ride home today.)

Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 08:13:45

Food stamps = $80,000,000,000 a year

Government contractors = $500,000,000,000+ a year

Comment by Bad Andy
2013-11-11 08:24:16

No excuse for either…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 09:05:04

At least the 500 billion produces helicopters and planes and tanks and such. Yes it is bloated and awful but we have the best military. What does the 80 billion produce? More poverty and hopelessness. Further generations of the same, but worse, having grown up in an environment with no examples of work ethic.

Why not cut em both in half?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 09:07:59

“What does the 80 billion produce?”

84% less death than the 500 billion……

Wack both.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-11-11 09:53:20

All you have to do is make them sit in English classes for their EBT card and i’ll bet 1/3 will quit, no need to cut….just demand we get something tangible in return like English literacy.

 
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 10:49:51

Good point DJ, and there we have the crux of he entire problem. No solution that requires accountability is ever really implemented. The LIEberL solution is always more money, not accountability. There are exceptions and safety valves to every accountability solution tried that end up undercutting and swallowing the rule.

My question for all the liberals here is, what do you do with someone who chooses not to work, not to avail themselves of drug rehab programs, not to put in effort towards bettering themselves?

On Veterans Day let me give you the solution that worked in generations past: Shape up or ship out.

 
Comment by Steve J
2013-11-11 10:50:18

I seem to recall 18% of food stamps are spent at Walmart.

 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 10:51:22

Dj, have you considered the possibility the system requires LESS, not more smarter people?

Several people on this blog assume everything would be better if there were no dumb people.

How do you know it would not lead to more conflict?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 13:47:25

Sweden vs. Sudan.

 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 18:25:42

OK Dan, took me a while but I got it.

So are you saying if all the nonwhite people in the United States became as smart as all the white people; all the problems among people of the United States would be solved?

*your move*

 
Comment by United States of Crooked Politicians and Bankers
2013-11-11 20:44:14

“I seem to recall 18% of food stamps are spent at Walmart.”

Queue Pink Floyd:

“And did we tell you the name of the game, boy? We call it Riding the Gravy Train.”

Walmart = Riding the Gravy Train of EBT largesse.

 
 
 
Comment by jane
2013-11-11 16:53:48

We all need to remember that the govt science, engineering, and defense contracting positions serve a fundamental purpose: they provide test beds and proving grounds for the next generation of scientists and engineers. These skills cannot be perfected while sitting on your butt and shooting off your mouth (or your keypad, as the case may be).

Seriously. You need hands on practice to translate calculations into things that work. With the evisceration of our manufacturing sector, we as a nation no longer have that as a venue for developing our intellectual capital in engineering and science.

Huff and puff all you want. Law school, and B-school, simply do not provide the test of truth, as much as of ability to generate BS. With a modicum of history thrown in as a grace note (in case studies and case law). It is nowhere near as demanding as demonstrating that your design actually flies or floats as intended.

Comment by MightyMike
2013-11-11 18:25:43

We all need to remember that the govt science, engineering, and defense contracting positions serve a fundamental purpose: they provide test beds and proving grounds for the next generation of scientists and engineers.

So the purpose of defense contracting is not to provide military hardward for the armed forces?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-11-11 08:05:53

How do we know that photo is real? Give us the middle finger so we know for sure. Thanks.

Sincerely,
The Give Us The Middle Finger Verification System Management Team

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 08:19:18

I think it emphasizes the middle finger Raytheon is already giving all of us.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 08:22:00

I would love to share some photos of the beautiful Raytheon campus, but I’d probably get arrested for being a suspected terrist if I got too nosy with the camera.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 09:13:00

How do you know he/she might just not pay someone to give you the middle finger in a photo?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 09:27:45

“How do we know that photo is real? Give us the middle finger so we know for sure. Thanks.”

Three toed sloths can’t do that. ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2013-11-11 12:11:54

‘The International Business Times reported Friday that the Department of Veterans Affairs had stopped releasing the number of non-fatal casualties of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, thus concealing what the paper called a “grim milestone” of 1 million injuries.’

‘All that can be said with any certainty is that as of last December more than 900,000 service men and women had been treated at Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics since returning from war zones in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that the monthly rate of new patients to these facilities as of the end of 2012 was around 10,000. Beyond that, the picture gets murky. In March, VA abruptly stopped releasing statistics on non-fatal war casualties to the public. However, experts say that there is no reason to suspect the monthly rate of new patients has changed…

“VA stopped preparing and releasing these reports on health care use and disability claims involving the 2.6 million U.S. service members who have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan without warning, claiming unspecified “security” reasons.”

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 06:32:58

Here are my no-brainer tips for mom-and-pop investors in case the Fed follows through with the QE3 taper.

1) Get out of stocks and long-term Treasurys.

2) Get into short-to-intermediate Treasurys.

3) Buy back stocks and long-term Treasurys after yields have adjusted up to historic norms.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 06:35:47

SOCGEN: This Is It For The Stock Market
Matthew Boesler
Nov. 10, 2013, 5:30 AM

In its latest monthly report, Société Générale’s asset allocation team argues the U.S. stock market will be “at best flat over the coming few quarters, not forgetting risk of short-term correction.”

The firm expects the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note to rise to 3.9% in 2014 (from the current level of 2.75%) as the Fed winds down its quantitative easing program, making stocks less attractive on a relative basis.

“With bond yields expected to rise, equities may suffer in a weak economic recovery regime,” says SocGen’s head of global asset allocation Alain Bokobza. “Rising bond yields during period of economic recovery are not necessarily bad for equities. However, at a time when earnings momentum remains weak and the consensus earnings growth estimate is expected to moderate, rising bond yields could be a catalyst for a U.S. equity market correction.”

In the report, the SocGen strategists break down the impact of rising bond yields on the stock market:

Our methodology: For a given level of equity risk premium and 10-year government bond yield, we calculate the implied index level for U.S. equity market. We then compare the calculated index level with the current market level to calculate the implied upside for the equity market. For example, if U.S. 10-year government bond yield were to approach 3.5% and U.S. equity risk premium remained where it is now (4.65%), our model suggests the U.S. equity market could be 22% below its current level (see the table below). In our analysis, we keep all other parameters the same.

Key conclusion – Further S&P 500 progression from current level is unlikely as U.S. government bond yields head higher in 2014. We expect U.S. government bond yields to approach 4% by Dec. 2014. At that level of yield, and with the normalisation of the risk premiums from rather cheap today (4.65%) to their long-term average (3.9%, which is an optimistic assumption), this would leave no room for U.S. equities to continue progressing after already five years of sustained equity index rise (+51% total return since the Lehman crisis).

Potential for a near-term correction in U.S. equities can’t be ruled out. The FED will eventually bring tapering back on the agenda in 2014. After all, does real GDP growth of 2.8% in the last quarter really deserve not only zero rates but also active monetary injection? Our analysis suggests that a U.S. government bond yield between 3% and 3.5% could trigger a correction of between -12% and -22% on the current ERP.

Comment by cactus
2013-11-11 13:24:05

“Rising bond yields during period of economic recovery are not necessarily bad for equities. ”

Well they are bad for bonds so people rotate into equities.

also good for the dollar so very short term bonds should do OK.

IF INTEREST RATES RISE next year

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 06:41:35

Investors pull $1.8 billion out of stock funds worldwide: BofA
NEW YORK Fri Nov 8, 2013 10:54am EST

(Reuters) - Investors pulled $1.8 billion out of stock funds worldwide in the latest week on uncertainty over the U.S. Federal Reserve’s next move, data from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research report showed on Friday.

The outflows from stock funds in the week ended November 6 reversed big inflows over the previous three weeks. In the prior week, investors poured $12.4 billion into the funds.

Strong U.S. data on manufacturing and Midwest business activity over the week stoked fears that the Fed could begin scaling back its $85 billion in monthly bond-buying at its December meeting rather than in early 2014.

The Fed’s bond-buying has kept interest rates low and driven investors into riskier assets such as stocks, fueling a 24 percent rise in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index this year and record inflows of $228.8 billion into stock funds.

Overall, investors showed an aversion to risk and profit-taking in the latest week by pulling cash out of stock funds and committing money to safer bond and money market funds, according to the data, which also cited figures from fund-tracker EPFR Global.

Funds that hold U.S. stocks had outflows of $7.5 billion, with the majority of withdrawals leaving exchange-traded funds, including the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. The ETF had outflows despite a 0.4 percent rise in the S&P 500 over the weekly period.

Emerging market stock funds had outflows of $1 billion over the weekly period, their largest outflows in five weeks. Emerging market assets have benefited from the Fed’s bond-buying.

Comment by azdude02
2013-11-11 07:53:49

get out before wall street hoses you again.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2013-11-11 07:16:13

4) Get and stay out of debt.

5) Have some cash tucked away. It might become very useful.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 07:22:47

Those were givens, but thanks for the reminders!

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 07:22:56

None of this is going to end in a milquetoast way. And make no mistake about it, it’s going to end.

Got cash?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 07:31:13

Right now your pockets are full of borrowed money…. the piper will call and your pockets will be empty.

A vote for the Collapsicans or Collapsicrats won’t change anything.

Got Cash?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 07:29:56

Nov. 10, 2013, 12:01 p.m. EST
Yellen to get quizzed as taper-timing debate rages
By Steve Goldstein, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — It’s a pretty good time for Janet Yellen to face some public scrutiny.

The nominee to chair the Federal Reserve will be questioned by the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday at 10 a.m. Eastern, at a time when markets have changed their tune on when the central bank may start reducing its bond purchases.

Jobs data caused interest rates to rise.

Yellen has never been in a hurry to taper, but the jobs data released Friday offer some food for thought.

 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 07:50:53

Much better just to stash cash and wait for prices to drop across the board. I see the basis for your advice, but going in any one direction is an issue of timing and you can’t time these things. A year or two ago, I thought tapering would have begun by now.

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 08:13:02

Gotta agree with Sweetie here. Too much risk. I’d rather get no return for a while than lose 50% trying to wring out a few percent return. At least for the next few years.

We certainly seem to be at something of a fulcrum point in the next 6 months. Either that new construction is going to sell or not. If it doesn’t, the dominoes topple. this makes me want to wait. Except I firmly believe that THEY WILL DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO STOP THE NEXT SLIDE.

From talking to my friends coworkers and neighbors most of whom got burned bad in the collapse, I know this next leg down, if it happens, will be psychologically devastating.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 09:09:25

There is no if…. only a matter of when…..

And when is that?

Imminent.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by rms
2013-11-11 10:01:52

“From talking to my friends coworkers and neighbors most of whom got burned bad in the collapse, I know this next leg down, if it happens, will be psychologically devastating.”

Is “burned bad” a loss of home equity and 401k wealth, or a job loss and the wife running off with someone solvent?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 10:55:23

It is the results of their buying overpriced shacks at the wrong time abetted by the REIC, then having the value drop drastically, sometimes in half. Many lost mucho savings, had to take out retirement money, etc. Yes they made bad choices in buying a house. Nothing to do with wives running off.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:14:39

“I’d rather get no return for a while than lose 50% trying to wring out a few percent return.”

What state of the world are you envisioning (at what subjective probability of occurrence) where you lose 50% in short-to-mid-term Treasury funds?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:12:56

So long as you keep your duration short, Treasurys are better than U.S. dollar-denominated cash, as they pay a yield.

 
 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 08:12:31

Sounds good to me. The $50k I just moved into a short term mixed bond two weeks ago is now at $50,030 and change…But I still have that principle.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 19:55:59

SocGen: Rising Bond Yields Threaten Stock Market Rally
Monday, 11 Nov 2013 01:56 PM
By Dan Weil

Ascending bond yields will keep the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index flat “at best” in coming quarters, with the possibility of a short-term correction, say Societe Generale strategists led by Alain Bokobza.

The 10-year Treasury yield hit a seven-week high of 2.75 percent Friday after news of a 204,000 gain in October payrolls.

The SocGen analysts see the Federal Reserve tapering its quantitative easing next year, they say in a report obtained by CNBC.

“The Fed will eventually bring tapering back on the agenda in 2014. After all, does real GDP growth of 2.8 percent in the last quarter really deserve not only zero rates but also active monetary injection?” they question.

A combination of accelerating economic growth and appreciating interest rates isn’t necessarily bad for stocks, the analysts say.

“However, at a time when earnings momentum remains weak and the consensus earnings growth estimate is expected to moderate, rising bond yields could be a catalyst for a U.S. equity market correction,” they write.

“Those saying that an economic acceleration would translate into higher returns on equity are very probably wrong.”

The analysts expect the 10-year Treasury yield to approach 4 percent by December 2014.

While stocks are near record highs, “doubts abound that this stunning success can continue,” writes Barron’s Ben Levisohn.

“High-priced growth stocks such as Tesla Motors are selling off, and investors have sought safety in consumer staples and utilities.”

 
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-11-11 07:35:59

Happy Veterans Day to all still serving, and to those who have served.

Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 08:03:18

Subtle defense contractor trolling.

Comment by inchbyinch
2013-11-11 09:28:27

“Subtle defense contractor trolling”…

Nope, not at all. Had a friend who was a WWII vet. Know lots of Vietnam vets. Have a nephew who got his brain damage in Afghanistan. While I agree with the dislike of the MIC, don’t be hard on the vets.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 09:31:54

Who said anything that can be remotely interpreted as “hard on the vets”?

You’re a pandering fool.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 10:17:26

My father and 2 of my brothers were in the military (1 brother still is and has “toured” Iraq 2x and afghan 1x). We don’t really talk about it but in the limited cases where it’s come up, I don’t hesitate to say I think the military makes us a lot less safe and prosperous. It’s not the same as blaming individual servicemembers. But it is true, if the sheep didn’t line up to “serve”, things would be different, we couldn’t occupy nations or fight endless wars or spend billions on tanks and planes the military doesn’t even want.

I think my dad strongly dislikes the military in this country now, but I can’t say for sure. He does scoff at veteran pandering because of the high level of insincerity and the fact that the real beneficiaries of the military are the .00001%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-11-11 12:03:55

But it is true, if the sheep didn’t line up to “serve”, things would be different, we couldn’t occupy nations or fight endless wars or spend billions on tanks and planes the military doesn’t even want.

As long as that’s the best job/career you’re offering, why would you expect them not to?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2013-11-11 13:14:45

As long as that’s the best job/career you’re offering, why would you expect them not to?

As GS-fixer has said before, being a military grunt is about the only middle class, blue collar job left. Plus it can lead to a civilian FedGov job later.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-11-11 18:33:20

As GS-fixer has said before, being a military grunt is about the only middle class, blue collar job left. Plus it can lead to a civilian FedGov job later.

That’s interesting. My impression was that young guys were joining up to get money for college of a trade school.

 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 08:25:20

Support our troops
These colors don’t run
Power of pride
Remember 9/11
Let’s roll
Bring it on
Mission accomplished

et cetera

Regards,

goon.squad.ctr@xxx.xxx.mil

Comment by Steve J
2013-11-11 10:55:09

God is on our side.

Comment by SV guy
2013-11-11 11:37:38

To paraphrase the late, great George Carlin;

‘Two nations at war, each with god on their side………………….
someone’s going to be disappointed!’

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 07:48:15

Had to drive to work today. First time since mid/late February. Rail service is limited today bc of the federal holiday. Traffic was light but it’s still a pain in the rear. No idea how people do these clown car commutes voluntarily day after day. I also really missed the adrenaline rush from biking.

An even better question - WHY (??) do people drive to some of these random suburbs.

I was at a wedding in Richmond this weekend. Between DC and Richmond, all I saw were new commuter developments, as far out as Quantico (FBI headquarters, Marine officer training grounds). Some even past Quantico. And the Dept of Transit was adding all these HOV and express lanes. We’re talking 75 miles from DC and at least 55-60 miles from Tyson’s/Dulles area of NoVA. Most of the construction was townhouses of the garage + 3 levels above variety. Very cookie cutter. $400k and up. That’s probably for a basic model. I’m sure there are HOA fees too. Some McMansions but I was on I-95 so I mostly saw townhomes, the McMansions are probably further from the highway, all I saw were advertising signs. (4BR houses starting at low $500s, etc).

People who buy that far away are just pissing their lives away, it’s nuts. They learned NOTHING from the ‘07-09 time period. And they learned NOTHING from the government budget battles and shutdowns.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 07:52:40

Liberace!

Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 08:26:44

Downlow Joe has entered the building

 
 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 08:17:04

Always, renting is cheaper than buying. That NYT calculator the other day did not factor in the lower commute costs due to always movi g to where your job moves. Home moaners cannot do that. I know several who drive 60 miles or more each way. It takes away from workout time and makes them unhealthy. This morning’s regimen was swimming for me - the main set was thirteen 200-yard sprints.

An oatmeal, blueberries and coffee breakfast and I am kicking!

Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 08:29:15

What intervals do you do for 200 yrd sprints?

Long course or short course?

It’s very hard to sprint 200 yrds swimming. The 200 yd races (free and IM) were the premier tests of fitness. It’s a sprintable distance but just barely. Meaning, you really can give 100% (whereas the 400/500 distances are meticulously paced). But if you give 100% in a 200, you wouldn’t really be able to turn around and do another 200… it would take some cool down, rest, and warm up.

I guess what I’m saying is, if you do them on 3 min intervals that is brutal, esp if you do it long course.

Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 09:34:03

You don’t stand a chance of doing 100% all out if you take short rests between sprints. You do swim a faster pace than if you did a continuous 2600. I could tell this was a very good workout by detecting marked increase in blood flow for 30 minutes following my workout. It is short course 25 yards. Was worried before the workout that 13 would be too many. Rest interval very short so my heart rate stayed elevated. 600 yards warm up and 200 yards cool down

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 10:11:30

So what interval do you do? I know we used to do 200’s on the 3 minutes back in the day. When I got to college we practiced long course a lot and I couldn’t do repeats on the 3 minutes without the turns. (I walked on for swimming but quit after freshman yr to focus on crew. I only ever got to swim in meets against terrible teams like Rutgers or Providence.)

I had to pick between 200IM and 200 free in HS/USS because of the way our meets were structured. Usually our divers completed their 5 dives in under 15 minutes, not enough time between the events. I could only do both events when we had a combined guys/girls meet, which I hated because those would take 4 hours.

Swimming is good for aging. Just needs to be paired with some weight bearing exercise and some stretching with bands.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 10:50:46

Interval…I have to get back to using a water resistant watch. 3 minutes is an awesome interval. I am 54. To put this in perspective I did 100 yard intervals about 3 years back starting on 1:55 and ending at 1:47. Near the end I would have very little rest.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 11:03:52

Weights…I do a push ups workout the days I swim. The alternate days pull ups then biceps on machine.

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 19:50:52

On the interval topic, when I trained with the masters swimming the coach would start us out on easy intervals. Then he’d tighten up the time toward the end. Another workout is ladders. I forgot how that went. We would do mostly 50s and 100s. Yeah I only called 200 yard swims “sprints” based on that I was doing boring distance continuous 2 mile swims four days a week for 3 years. Breaking it up makes it more interesting.

I did not train in high school or college. From what I read, you have to do training when you are young to develop the cardiovascular system to go super fast. It’s not too late to improve cardio in swimming, but it’s too late for me to be a racer. And I’m under 6 feet tall, which really handicaps me in any race.

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 19:57:06

And the weight exercises are basically my way of getting back the strength I used to have. I have done remarkably well in pushups. But I have a long way to get back where I used to be in pullups. If you had only two upper body exercises you wanted to do, those would be pushups and pullups. Pushups for chest, pullups for back and shoulders. Both work your core strength. The former also really works the triceps if you position your hands right. The latter also works the biceps.

Then there is diet. The mark of success is when you can do more reps than the previous time you did that same exact workout. I have been rotating different pushups workouts every three weeks and will tighten it to every two weeks.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-11-11 21:09:54
 
 
 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 09:23:18

This morning’s regimen was swimming for me - the main set was thirteen 200-yard sprints.
—————————————————————————

If this swimming results in an increase in your lung capacity, will your child inherit a greater lung capacity?

or webbing between its toes?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 09:31:12

No. But it probably means they will not inherit your money as early.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 09:35:44

What Albuquerque said!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-11-11 09:36:01

Hey spook, good for you. Although we use our pool, I do more water aerobics and volleyball than swim.

Baby due when?
I assume this is the caboose?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-11-11 10:26:47

I’m working on a project for an advancement to Darwinian Evolution called “epigenetics” (support, I’m not a scientist or researcher) and the answer to increased lung capacity is “yes”, in some cases they will.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 10:53:04

I studied biology in university (one of my degrees). I wonder, in the case of lung capacity, how could they tease out lung capacity with simply the ability to improve lung capacity (which might be consistent with people who are good at, and therefore like to swim–the better you are at something, the more likely you are to do it)?

Very cool field of study though…very cool.

Oh, and just for fun. Evolution is a myth. The earth is 4,126 days, 14 hours and 21 minutes old. Dinosaurs aren’t in the bible because everyone who was writing down their observations got eaten by a T-Rex, and their notes were lost.

 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 10:56:07

Rocks, what is the mechanism for adaption that results in a change in morphology/structure?

Mutation?

If so, is it in your DNA or your childs?

 
Comment by HBB_Rocks
2013-11-11 11:11:49

Not 100% sure, that’s what this major study is for.

The basic idea of darwinian evolution is that genetic drift is essentially random, but this study says that certain characteristics are inheritable (not sure which all are yet- could be a lot!) and able to be passed from parents to offspring. The original study focused on things like weight and disposition (yeah that’s right), and they are included as well but very difficult to study across generations.

They are not sure of the triggering mechanism (usually trauma or hard times is a strong trigger in the original study) but athleticism is also a trigger, and things like muscle definition and lung capacity seem to be able to be passed on for multiple generations.

This is all still very theoretical -it’ll be a long time before the results come out.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 12:08:42

I have heard of it but I thought it related to extreme stress such as famine not someone just getting exercise but since we did not know the exact parameters I guess it is in theory possible but so is winning the lottery.

 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 14:17:06

A lot of the increases we could see in lung capacity (VO2 max) could probably be achieved by better regulating surfactants which help inflation of the lungs & keep them from collapsing.

From what I understand, increasing the actual surface area of the lungs during a person’s lifetime would basically be impossible without causing a whole cascade of problems.

Someday someone will probably break all of Michael Phelps records by exploiting scientific advances.

 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 14:37:33

Rocks, is there any truth to telegony?

 
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2013-11-11 08:26:15

Some of them have jobs further out, or at least one person in a couple has a job further out like being a teacher. Sound familiar?

Then again, I was talking to a friend at the office the other day. Her neighbors both commute to DC every day. 18 miles from where they live to their respective offices door-to-door. Halloween wasn’t a great commute day. Not tragic, but iffy weather and more people trying to get home early than usual to do trick or treating with young kids. Total time to travel that 18 miles (not sure of the start time, probably around 3:00) by car? Two and a half hours. And it would be worse on a non-Halloween day with actual rain or snow, not just grey skies a few scattered showers.

She commutes too, mostly by car. Says that as long as she leaves before 6:00 am, she can usually get to the office by 6:30. Ugh. I work a much later schedule. I like to do stuff in the city after I’m done with work. No use being done with a full day at 3:00 PM if I am going to a show or a concert or something else at 6:00 or 7:00 or 8:00.

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 08:46:39

Anything over about an hour (at best) is truly awful. I hear these horror stories of people with kids stuffing them in the car at 6AM and not getting back home until 8 PM, all so they can own a house in the Bay Area. Or working themselves into the ground all so the nanny can raise the kids.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-11-11 09:47:29

Light Rail is fantastic. Los Angeles has a great light rail system, but most folks consider it a low end way of getting around. Not us, the car is left in the park and ride lot. The metro is in its early development stages. When they expand it to the beach in Santa Monica, maybe the public will wake up. $5 for a day pass, $150 or less for a monthly pass.
It’s a bargain. Go Metro!

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 11:00:30

When they expand it to the beach in Santa Monica. Good luck with that ever actually happening. LAs public transportation is awful unless you happen to live in the very limited areas that make it convenient.

There is no train from downtown or Santa Monica or Century City to the airport. Ridiculous.

The fact that it doesn’t work is part of the reason why there are so many cars being used, not vice versa. Hop on the 10 from the west side to downtown any morning and tell me after taking an hour to go 10 miles how good it is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 10:30:34

Polly, the express lane construction is crazy. You know the lanes I mean, with the gates to control traffic inbound in the AM and outbound in the PM. The idea that the state of VA has decided to do such construction just tells you how crazy the sprawl situation is. A generation ago, people wouldn’t have dreamed of commuting from Quantico to DC or NoVA.

I’m talking a lot further out than I come from, I am 35 miles and I don’t need a car for any part of the trip. One urban area to antoher urban area. Even if you drive to a VRE station, you’re still tied up in traffic to get there. I hear parking at the stations fills up early. My intern this summer used to come into the office an hour before he had to because the Vienna Metro parking lot is jammed by 730am.

One last thought — I’m on the NE corridor/Amtrak lines so there are many more train options than the VRE lines. VRE also isn’t electrified, they run diesel engines. My understanding is these have more problems with lateness and breakdowns. When I lived in Charlottesville, I took Amtrak between C’ville and DC quite a bit and the diesel engines broke down 2x and were late at least half the time. (I know that’s not VRE, but the routes converge in that route 66 corridor near Manassas/Culpeper)

 
 
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 08:40:36

I think the reason you can’t see it is because you don’t have the kids yet. You and your wife are still living the DINK life right? Fun bars and restaurants. Still enough piss and vinegar to grind away 50 or 60 hours plus at work and still get some gym time in. Weekends where you can do fun singles things that tend to recharge your batteries.

An hour each way v. a half hour each way usually. It is only an extra hour. Yes, it is a very valuable hour and also a very stressful hour when done in traffic. There are some ways to lessen the stress, carpool with friends, audiobooks or podcasts, or good ole talk radio for some fun anger at the Liebs. It is still a grind.

But if it gets you to a place where your wife can maybe stay home, your kids are in a great public school, your neighbors are good fun people, the neighborhood is not within a mile of throat slitting gangbangers, the park is full of kids at play and life is generally pretty good, then that hour maybe worth it.

It is usually so much cheaper out there for what you get especially when factoring in the need for private schools that usually comes with any kind of decent area near a city because the public schools there still usually suck. Look at Pasadena for one.

Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 09:15:43

It is usually so much cheaper out there for what you get especially when factoring in the need for private schools that usually comes with any kind of decent area near a city because the public schools there still usually suck. Look at Pasadena for one.

Don’t underestimate this… everyone I know who lives close to Boston deals with public schools because they can’t afford private schools after paying the ridiculous housing prices. Those I know who live in the exurbs like me send their kids to private schools. We can afford it with the cheaper housing down here. I’ll gladly take a better education for my two children while avoiding the mouth-breathers and government-cheese-eaters they would have to interact with in public school.

In our situation, I’m the only one with a long commute. My wife works 15 minutes from home and both my parents and in-laws are 15 minutes from us. Besides, I telecommute 1-2 days a week. The big city is a fine place to visit, but anyone who raises a family there is a damn fool…

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-11-11 13:27:54

avoiding the mouth-breathers and government-cheese-eaters they would have to interact with in public school.

Ever eaten government cheese, NE? I have, while attending public school, while BOTH parents worked their a$$es off for scraps.

I now venture to say that I make in the top 1% of my HS and college peers.

Eff you and everybody else with your “Everybody’s a Socialist but me!” dogma.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 13:57:08

Ever eaten government cheese, NE? I have, while attending public school, while BOTH parents worked their a$$es off for scraps.

Good for you. You managed to work through adversity and achieve some measure of success. Have you ever once stopped to think that every dollar the government took from other hard working families to pay for your government cheese was a dollar that could have gone to their children instead of you?

Government: Picking winners is what you do.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2013-11-11 14:24:40

Have you ever once stopped to think that every dollar the government took from other hard working families to pay for your government cheese was a dollar that could have gone to their children instead of you?

Yes, because the taxes that I now pay go to others of similar circumstance, that they may one day also pull themselves up and achieve success. I’ve paid back far more than I ever ate of your cheese (and bread), NE. I don’t obsess over a small percent who game the system. Speaking from experience, most people taking your cheese would rather not.

But I keep forgetting, your $250k job is in the, never-never-never-NEVER-took-a-dime-from-hard-working-families-to-move-it-forward, IT industry.

Glass houses, NE. Glass houses.

 
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 15:49:20

I think you are an anomaly from the past. Not in having eaten government cheese, many, including me, have done that. That is how it worked years ago when your hard working parents got a little help. Today it isn’t about helping hard working people. It is about handouts to no-working people and what that does to our society and it’s future.

And it isn’t a very few gaming the system, it is the system. We all seem to agree that if it is some larger percentage then that is wrong and should be stopped. What percentage would you need to beleive are in the gaming the system category before you did let it worry you? Because I see it as at least 30 percent plus.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-11-11 15:57:24

I think you are an anomaly from the past. Not in having eaten government cheese, many, including me, have done that. That is how it worked years ago when your hard working parents got a little help. Today it isn’t about helping hard working people. It is about handouts to no-working people and what that does to our society and it’s future.

How do you know this? Do you actually have any facts? Given the trends in the economy over the past 40 years, the opposite may actually be true. A larger portion of our poor and near-poor population may actually be working than they were in decades past.

 
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 19:28:35

Then Mike you also agree with me that if there is the rampant fraud then there should be a solution. This is why the 30 percent figure troubles you so. See we have similar values, just a dispute over the facts. What percentage would you need to see to think the same as we do that it is a problem?

And like the government or some university study is going to actually track the fraud out there?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2013-11-11 19:57:51

Are you admitting that you have no evidence that things are different now than they were when you were a kid?

Also, when you mention 30%, which program are you talking about? Northeasterner mentioned government cheese. I assume that he meant food stamps or perhaps the school lunch program. Are you saying that 30% of the spending in those programs is fraudulent, meaning that it goes to people who don’t qualify?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 08:50:34

Liberace,

No matter where you choose, you’re going to sustain irrecoverable losses on housing. No matter if you buy now or in the past 13 years.

 
Comment by Pete
2013-11-11 14:27:52

“No idea how people do these clown car commutes voluntarily day after day.”

>>Of the estimated 12,700 commuters who travel out of the region for a one-way trip of at least 30 minutes to work, 53 percent said commuting provides an opportunity for better pay and benefits, better chances for advancement, and a relaxing drive.<<

http://www.coopercenter.org/csr/commuters-better-jobs-worth-long-drive-winchester-star

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-11-11 07:58:55

Of course they release this on a holiday:

The collapse of two Bear Stearns hedge funds in 2007 was among the earliest signs of the impending financial crisis. More than six years later, lawyers continue to fight over the cause of their demise.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/11/11/suit-charges-3-credit-rating-agencies-with-fraud-in-bear-stearns-case/

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 08:17:13

Enjoy the die-off, loosers!

“The human psyche naturally rebels against the idea of its end. Likewise, civilizations have throughout history marched blindly toward disaster, because humans are wired to believe that tomorrow will be much like today — it is unnatural for us to think that this way of life, this present moment, this order of things is not stable and permanent. Across the world today, our actions testify to our belief that we can go on like this forever, burning oil, poisoning the seas, killing off other species, pumping carbon into the air, ignoring the ominous silence of our coal mine canaries in favor of the unending robotic tweets of our new digital imaginarium. Yet the reality of global climate change is going to keep intruding on our fantasies of perpetual growth, permanent innovation and endless energy, just as the reality of mortality shocks our casual faith in permanence.

The biggest problem climate change poses isn’t how the Department of Defense should plan for resource wars, or how we should put up sea walls to protect Alphabet City, or when we should evacuate Hoboken. It won’t be addressed by buying a Prius, signing a treaty, or turning off the air-conditioning. The biggest problem we face is a philosophical one: understanding that this civilization is already dead. The sooner we confront this problem, and the sooner we realize there’s nothing we can do to save ourselves, the sooner we can get down to the hard work of adapting, with mortal humility, to our new reality.”

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/learning-how-to-die-in-the-anthropocene/

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 08:56:11

And the solution to the alarmist cries is, of course, more money, bigger budgets, etc. All to face this new threat.

Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 09:07:50

For the Al Gore bedwetters, perhaps.

My solution is to accept that there is no solution. Humanity is a cancer to the global ecosystem. I don’t owe any kind of future to your grandchildren.

As poet, mystic, and drunk Jim Morrison once wisely said, “I just wanna get my kicks before the whole sh*thouse goes up in flames”

Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 09:54:58

I don’t owe any kind of future to your grandchildren.

My 10yo daughter can shoot an AR15 accurately at 100 yards. She is about to test for her brown belt in Kenpo Karate. Her swim team training is three days a week swimming laps non-stop for an hour. She is currently an “A” student at her parochial school…

I don’t expect society to provide for my children, that’s my job. However, they will be as prepared as possible for whatever the future holds, whether that future is global competition or Armageddon.

Seriously, have a little goon. There is nothing in the world like the feeling of being a proud parent as your child grows and truly excels (not this “everyone gets a trophy crap”).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 10:23:28

Yeah man, this is what I think too. White Americans are like a dying breed, look at the census, well under 50% of births in recent years, up and down the coasts.

The only reason I want to have a kid is to pass along the estate. But if I don’t have a kid, then I can just blow it. So which is more enjoyable or fun? And will this country really be in the toilet by the time my kid is middle aged? Think of Greece but without the racial/ethnic ties. Or Japan after the tsunami but without the solidarity and family ties. There’s way too many people here in the US who don’t have a stake–not just immigrants but tons and tons of white trash.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 11:26:59

Some close friends (who we have known over 20 years) have three sprogs, to which I am Uncle Goon. As the sole squad sibling is sprogless, and likely to remain so, those three will get everything. Unless of course they grow up to be junkies or ungrateful little twits, in which case I’ll just will it all to the Foothills Animal Shelter.

http://foothillsanimalshelter.org/

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-11-11 12:06:32

The only reason I want to have a kid is to pass along the estate. But if I don’t have a kid, then I can just blow it. So which is more enjoyable or fun?

And with no kids who do you trust to take care of you when you can no longer do it yourself? Or do you have a plan for that like some here?

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 12:37:48

My parents have been taking care of my great aunt who is in assisted living. She is 87 and has Alzheimer’s, though she is otherwise healthy. So things like medication, finances, etc. are the responsibility of my parents.

I can’t tell you how much time and energy has been spent over the last 7 years in taking care of that elderly loved one… What I can tell you is that if you reach that age and have no one who is willing to help care for you, I guarantee your life is going to be a living hell for however long it lasts.

 
Comment by rms
2013-11-11 12:42:20

“I can’t tell you how much time and energy has been spent over the last 7 years in taking care of that elderly loved one… What I can tell you is that if you reach that age and have no one who is willing to help care for you, I guarantee your life is going to be a living hell for however long it lasts.”

+1 There was wisdom in the “man called horse” elderly castoff.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 13:39:28

No guarantee your kid will be around to take care of you. Your kid will have career and kids too, or do you assume everything is all about YOU? Buy LTD insurance

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 14:31:43

No guarantee your kid will be around to take care of you. Your kid will have career and kids too, or do you assume everything is all about YOU? Buy LTD insurance

LOLZ. That’s why you have 2… 2 is 1, 1 is none.

Seriously, that statement is probably why our society has so many issues today. Family is key. Without family, what are you? An individual among billions…

Even Goonsquad admits that he is an uncle. He has family, just no offspring of his own.

 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 14:42:07

No guarantee your kid will be around to take care of you.
——————————————————————-

thats what immigrants are for.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 16:36:06

Yes, and how many of the elderly have been robbed, raped or killed by the current crop of immigrants?

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2013-11-11 17:09:16

Nor’easterner, 2 kids, $500,000 to raise em

 
Comment by spook
2013-11-11 18:38:05

Yes, and how many of the elderly have been robbed, raped or killed by the current crop of immigrants?
——————————————————————–

I don’t know.

But what I do know is some white person ran the numbers and DECIDED the cost is acceptable for the benefit.

Was it you Dan?

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 20:08:53

“thats what immigrants are for.”

That’s the deal. I know some very bright second generation Americans who give me hope - so why worry about the so called lack of people? Color of the skin should not matter. The white skins are disappearing and if we disappear completely big deal. There will still be humans to improve the quality of life on earth and colonize space (hopefully) to give the human species longevity. A big asteroid could wipe out ancestors of ours on earth but those on other planets or colonies who are self sufficient will survive. That is the point.

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 20:18:01

My point was “what if your kids have other plans?” They have a busy life.

My dad lived six more years than my mom. The last 7 months he had LTC at his house. A friend would pop in almost daily. My oldest sister was living there too but no help. My dad had 24/7 care the last few months.

My sister was around only because my dad gave her things and she did not want a job. She had two kids, one an adult and one in high school at the time. They lived there too, sponging off my dad. If not for their neediness, they would have not been there.

I had my aunt in an assisted living home the last two years of her life after my uncle died. She was bipolar schizophrenic and had years before recovered from breast cancer. But she had a very bright room with three windows and a separate door to outside. The home took good care. I would pop in for a half hour or so every couple of days. I had my own life. Work, a girlfriend (and that meant relationship maintenance). At the same time my dad was dying of cancer and I would go fly to California from Arizona every other weekend to pop in.

But it was a short visit relatively. Stay all weekend. And so I presume you who say having kids will be a way to get taken care of when you are very sick and old and terminal - I betcha you don’t have Long Term Care insurance or intend to get it. So you expect a younger relative to be with you 24/7?

They have their own lives. You are intending to negatively affect others - the bad type of selfishness by making others a slave to you. Sounds like a liberal.

 
 
Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 11:24:33

In the last known picture taken of Jim Morrison he is wearing a pink shirt with a blue sweater tied around his shoulders. Looking very preppy. Seriously?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-11 20:04:40

A preppy poet. Hard to believe. According to the movie “The Doors”, they made Jim Morrison get off on violence. I did not believe it. Oliver Stone had to do something quirky to mess it up I guess.

Jim Morrison was said to have a genius IQ. I think he wrote “Horse Latitudes” in public school. He studied the great poets and was impressed with great poets such as Blake (of course) and Rimbaud. Not sure but I think Wallace Stevens was also an influence.

Now you tell me how many boys in high school today could do what Jim Morrison did at their age?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 09:01:25

Sorry the world is going to end due to global warming and we will continue to have big storms because that is the natural cycle but not due to any AGW.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 09:05:14

http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/typhoon-haiyan-sea-surface-temperature-anomalies-for-early-storm-track/

This shows that there was no warming of the waters that caused this to be a super storm just the natural ebb and flow of temperatures.

 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 09:06:00

The Indians have sent a probe to Mars. China is planning a colony on the moon. Lady Gaga will be performing in orbit on a Virgin shuttle. Our civilization isn’t dead, nor will it be barring some celestial calamity between now and about 2050…

The expansion into our solar system is inevitable and will open up VAST amounts of untapped resources necessary for continued growth. We’ll be stuck within our solar system until we discover a means to travel FTL, but we should have some breathing room until then.

We are the most dangerous and war-like species this planet has ever produced and we expand like a virus, consuming everything in it’s wake… another 100 years and it will be time to see how Gaia’s progeny compares on an interstellar level.

Comment by spook
2013-11-11 09:33:26

we expand like a virus, consuming everything in it’s wake
——————————————————————

Is cancer a virus?

If so, why is it not smart enough to know not to kill its host?

Low IQ?

Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 10:00:47

Is cancer a virus?

If so, why is it not smart enough to know not to kill its host?

Because cancer cells probably act independently of other cells, as do people… both may realize that “resources are limited”, but both will also do what is in the best interest of the individual, not the whole.

If you and another are both starving and there is only enough food for one, what do you do? Do you split it and both die slowly? Do you choose death and let the other take the food? Do you take the food and thus choose death for the other? Same concept as above…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2013-11-11 10:02:15

Actually, researchers have ID 7 kinds of Breast Cancer for instance, and they think there might be a virus or bacteria origin to the puzzle of the epidemic. Although this is a hypothesis, leading research facilities think they are on to something.

High blood sugar levels and environmental toxics are your enemy as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 11:42:30

Many cancers are caused by a viruses, so I think it is quite likely. But cancer itself is not a virus.

 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 09:35:55

When your gerbil cage starts filling up with gerbil shit and the gerbils start killing and eating each other, the obvious solution is to stop adding more gerbils.

Put down the science fiction fantasies and accept that the future = there is no future. Humanity is doomed :)

 
Comment by Bluestar
2013-11-11 10:04:55

But what if we just change our DNA?
“Genetics breakthrough enables scientists to edit any part of human genome”
The technique, known as Crispr, enables the most detailed and specific possible alteration to any part of DNA of the 23 pairs of human chromosomes without introducing unintended mutations or flaws. “Crispr is absolutely huge. It’s incredibly powerful and it has many applications, from agriculture to potential gene therapy in humans,” Craig Mello of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, a 2006 Nobel Prize winner, told the paper.”

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/11/07/report-genetics-breakthrough-enables-scientists-to-edit-any-part-human-genome/

Why not just genetically engineer super humans? First item of business would be to create a few hundred humans with a average IQ of 300 and then turn them loose to create a race of HomoMaximus sapiens who would be indistinguishable from gods.

Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 10:27:09

Why not just genetically engineer super humans? First item of business would be to create a few hundred humans with a average IQ of 300 and then turn them loose to create a race of HomoMaximus sapiens who would be indistinguishable from gods.

Star Trek already covered this… the genetically-engineered super humans were Khan and his crew. Didn’t end well for James T. Kirk and his crew.

“KHAAAANNNN!!!!!!!”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2013-11-12 08:21:23

It’s a cunundrum. When societies attempted to do the same they were very totalitarian. The first to try to weed out the inferior ones were the Romans. They would take sickly babies and leave them out somewhere to die. Hitler tried the same too.

The humane approach? I don’t think there is a humane way to stop genetically inferior people from having kids.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-11-12 10:03:07

The humane approach? I don’t think there is a humane way to stop genetically inferior people from having kids.

The more we learn about genes the more we should question the concept of “genetically inferior”.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-11-11 09:14:49

Goon, if you haven’t yet, rent and watch

Children of Men
The Road

Comment by Resistor
2013-11-11 09:16:13

Rent, don’t buy… (it’s cheaper)

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 09:15:02

And this from the coastal elitist pointy headed liberal New York Times:

MIAMI BEACH — In the most dire predictions, South Florida’s delicate barrier islands, coastal communities and captivating subtropical beaches will be lost to the rising waters in as few as 100 years.

Further inland, the Everglades, the river of grass that gives the region its fresh water, could one day be useless, some scientists fear, contaminated by the inexorable advance of the salt-filled ocean. The Florida Keys, the pearl-like strand of islands that stretches into the Gulf of Mexico, would be mostly submerged alongside their exotic crown jewel, Key West.

“I don’t think people realize how vulnerable Florida is,” Harold R. Wanless, the chairman of the geological sciences department at the University of Miami, said in an interview last week. “We’re going to get four or five or six feet of water, or more, by the end of the century. You have to wake up to the reality of what’s coming.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/11/us/south-florida-faces-ominous-prospects-from-rising-waters.html?hpw&rref=science

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 09:23:43

Why is the Mormon church buying land in a state that will be underwater?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 09:24:28

“Anywhere within 50 miles of the coast will be underwater.”

Yes in more ways than one.

 
Comment by goon squad
2013-11-11 09:25:51

I’m glad I burned a lot (alot) of jet fuel to fly down to Miami and drive out to Key West to see Hemingway’s house and get my picture taken with his six-toed cats, since it will all be underwater in a few decades.

 
 
Comment by Resistor
2013-11-11 09:20:46

BTW, that guy has serious PTSD, and needs professional counseling. Seeing death in everything is not healthy.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-11-11 19:50:09

The biggest problem we face is a philosophical one: understanding that this civilization is already dead.
Nope. The biggest problem we face is that we will all individually die, no matter how much $ we set aside, how athletic we are, what wonderful places we move to, whatever. Worrying about dying civilizations is just a way to distract ourselves. What to do, what to do…

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 08:19:52

Real Estate
Are We Already Back in a Housing Bubble?
By Karen Weise
November 07, 2013

Home prices keep rising—and not just in some markets. For the first time since 2005, each of the country’s 50 most populous cities are seeing higher prices. While that could be a good sign for the economy, the market is showing signs of overheating and the current pace is not sustainable, according to a new report by Fitch Ratings.

The report regards home prices across the country as overvalued by about 17 percent. Conditions are worrisome in several markets, most of them in coastal California, where homes are more than 20 percent overvalued. San Francisco and San Jose will set new home price records in the next six months, according to Fitch. While Bay Area tech companies are booming, the region’s economy isn’t growing nearly as fast as the “unprecedented” home price gains, making the market nearly 30 percent overvalued. Current conditions in the heart of Silicon Valley are akin to “the environment in 2003,” the report notes ominously, “three years into the formation of the previous home price bubble.”

Prices are being driven by investor interest in flipping homes, another familiar phenomenon. Fitch estimates that half of all homes in the Bay Area are now bought with cash, Fitch says, and that’s “often indicative of investor behavior.”

The danger is that overvalued markets could stall if interest rates rise as the economy rebounds: “When an expectation of rising rates is coupled with rising price levels,” the report notes, “there could be increased pressure on the housing market that could reverse recent gains.” That echoes an argument that Zillow’s (Z) chief economist, Stan Humphries, made in April, when he said that low rates were acting like a “carnival funhouse mirror” that distorts reality. Cheap mortgages, he said, made homes appear affordable when in fact, they were overvalued relative to what people are earning.

Rents are not climbing nearly as fast as purchase prices. It may be time to revisit a trusty ol’ rent vs. own calculator to see whether renting or owning makes more sense.

Comment by Strawberrypicker
2013-11-11 08:57:35

Is this really all just the dead cat bounce playing out ?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 08:59:21

Take a look at sales transaction over the last 6 months…. your question will be answered with clarity.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 09:13:52

Your head is empty, the fire is out
And all the BS you’ve got to give has all spurted out…..
Your head is empty, the fire is out
And all the BS you’ve got to give has all spurted out…..
Your head is empty, the fire is out
And all the BS you’ve got to give has all spurted out…..

http://youtu.be/fqhUyK52c9Y

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 09:37:58

Would you rather own a home or eat?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 09:39:57

Technically speaking, isn’t the choice for debt-strapped home owners between paying the mortgage and eating?

BBC Panorama, The Great Housing Price Bubble: British families are ‘choosing between paying the rent and eating’

A new BBC documentary warns that the housing market is forcing people to give up other basic needs, as fears of a bubble return to parts of Britain
By Ed Cumming
1:06PM GMT 11 Nov 2013

British families are choosing between paying the rent and eating, according to the chairman of a food charity.

Chris Mould, the Executive Chairman of the Trussell Trust, which runs 400 food banks nationwide, said: “Many of them (clients) are choosing between paying the rent and eating, or they’re choosing between paying the mortgage or having a reposession order.”

Mould’s comments appear in Panorama: The Great Housing Price Bubble?, which airs tonight on BBC One.

The documentary claims that 31 per cent of people spend more than a third of their income on mortgage or rent, meaning that they can’t afford other basic needs.

According to organisations such as Shelter and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, if people are spending 35 per cent or more of their disposable income on their accommodation, they many not be able to afford other essentials.

Comment by rms
2013-11-11 10:15:19

“A new BBC documentary warns that the housing market is forcing people to give up other basic needs, as fears of a bubble return to parts of Britain”

But those Brits are “bend the knee” subjects, not people. :)

 
Comment by Steve J
2013-11-11 11:02:55

If only they had guns.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 09:41:26

Quiz: can you guess the price of these London properties?

London property prices aren’t always what you’d expect. Can you guess the pricetag of these capital homes?

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2013-11-11 10:09:54

What exactly IS a bubble? Shiller and Fama co-won the Nobel / Nobel Equivalent for economics. They don’t agree whether bubbles exist or even whether they can exist.

In my opinion, the signature of a bubble is a rapid rise in the increase of an asset price, followed by a fall. It’s rearward looking. But when in the bubble, how can we identify it? Some possibilities:

• The purchased object has no use to the buyer, but is purchased with the intent to be sold to another buyer at a higher price, yielding profit.

• When the market for this object is primarily driven by participants seeking to achieve profit via the first point.

Tulip bulbs, beanie babies, art, stocks, houses.

Thoughts, examples, counterpoints?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 10:53:54

• Would-be end users are outbid by speculators chasing price gains.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 10:57:26

• Price/dividend (or price/rent) and price/end-user income levels are blown out of the water compared to historic norms.

• Borrowing at historically and unsustainably low interest rate levels fuels speculative purchases of bubbly assets.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 12:00:02

Prices out of whack with the utility a product provides (as compared to alternatives that provide similar utility).

This can occur due to credit bubbles (making products more affordable), but also speculative fevers, where there is a fervent belief that price momentum exists such that a greater fool can be found, regardless of the prices being out of whack.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:34:15

“…there is a fervent belief that price momentum exists such that a greater fool can be found, regardless of the prices being out of whack.”

The other part of the fervor is the belief that *you* will be able to get out of falling knife investments before everyone else tries to do so.

 
 
 
Comment by brother_jimmy
2013-11-11 10:55:00

More evidence we are still in a bubble:

Had a couple dates with a nice young lady (RN). I did spend a fair amount of time mocking her for liking HGTV and last night she admitted she’s an aspiring real estate investor. The story goes like this: her and her parents invested in some Florida condos a few years back and finally unloaded them through short sales, but they are ramping up for round two. I suggested they broaden their horizons and take a look at Toronto :) She had no idea of P/L, rental income streams, just that the “people on HGTV can do it”.

Next….

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 11:53:36

Stupid people can make money if they have stupid government policies supporting them. The Government wants higher housing prices and will print money to obtain them. It will some day end and the people holding the bag will suffer but a few will get in and out fast enough. Fiat currency is the money of crony capitalism. It is what has undermined democracy in this country. The crony capitalism system will function until the currency collapses but the politically connected will make a fortune in the meantime and many will keep their ill gotten gains when we return to a system backed by something like gold.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2013-11-11 14:22:13

she’s an aspiring real estate investor.

Based on what you say she is an aspiring real estate *speculator* - and most likely a bad one.

Comment by Al
2013-11-11 14:51:52

If doctors and dentists can lose big bucks making bad investments, there no reason a nurse can’t do it too.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2013-11-11 16:48:47

“last night she admitted she’s an aspiring real estate investor”

It could have been worse, she could have admitted she was an aspiring real estate investor and her name was really Ralph.

 
Comment by tresho
2013-11-11 19:57:02

Had a couple dates with a nice young lady (RN).
She’s EEVIL. {Gesture holding cupped hands over forehead like horns growing} Don’t hook up with her.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 11:59:47

Gasoline at $3.18/gal for regular (after $0.20 discount). Let’s see what the Fed can do to pump up those pump prices, in order to forestall deflation!

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:01:39

P.S. We paid north of $4/gal in recent months.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:04:27

Check out all the places around San Diego selling gas under $3.40/gal!

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 12:15:38

What is diesel selling for? Don’t confuse a temp gasoline glut with deflation..

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:25:58

APEX
1602 E Valley Pkwy
Cross:
N Rose St
Escondido, CA, 92027-2409

Spotted:
Mon 8:04 AM

Reg $3.35
Mid $3.55
Prem $3.65
Diesel $3.68

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 12:37:28

What I am seeing in NM is gas prices about 2.85 but diesel around 3.71. I think in a very short time period gasoline will jump closer to the 3.71. These short term gluts mean nothing. Brent crude is still well above 100 dollars a barrel not far from where it was when the national average for gas was almost $4 a gallon. About ten dollars less which would translate into 25 cents a gallon or $3.75.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:44:47

My conjecture is that QE3 inflated commodities, including gold and oil. When the taper happens, let’s compare notes to see where things settle out.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 13:45:15

Of course it raised all prices but that was offset by manipulation of gold. That is why when you asked in the spring at what price you should buy gold I said below 1200 it got down to 1180. I have hidden in the platinum family of pm but before the fed seriously tightens gold will be back to the 2000 level.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 14:09:17

“…before the fed seriously tightens gold will be back to the 2000 level.”

How can you predict this? Do you have insider information on when they really plan to taper?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 15:40:36

No, but they do not want to deal with the headlines that gold is at another all time high. They have manipulated gold down every time people have been able to point to gold as an example that their printing is causing inflation. I have used these times to hedge my positions and/or change my mix of PMs. Right now I like 1. platinum/palladium 2. silver 3. Gold but soon I will pick 1. Silver 2. Gold 3. Platinum/palladium

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 20:56:28

My wife (aka “the coupon queen”) managed to pay $2.889/gal (after discounts) to fill the tank on our minivan today at one of those Escondido stations. :-)

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:32:17

Gasoline isn’t the only commodity whose price is falling. ;-)

Gold - Electronic (COMEX) Dec 2013
Market open $1,282.50
Change -$2.10 -0.16%
Volume 84,717
Nov 11, 2013, 2:20 p.m.
Previous close $ 1,284.60
Day low $1,278
Day high $1,289

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 12:43:24

Nov. 11, 2013, 2:14 p.m. EST
Gold futures extend slide on Fed taper fears
By William L. Watts and Shawn Langlois, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Gold futures slipped Monday, unable to shake off last week’s surprisingly strong U.S. jobs report and related expectations that the Federal Reserve will move soon to scale back the flow of monetary stimulus to the economy.

December gold futures fell $3.50, or 0.3%, to close at $1,281.10 an ounce in floor trading on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, its lowest finish since Oct. 15.

Silver, meanwhile, dropped four cents to end at $21.28 an ounce.

Typhoon Haiyan was downgraded to a severe tropical storm as it hit the coast of Vietnam. Relief workers say flooding and landslides are still a concern. Francis Markus of the International Federation of the Red Cross talks about the damage Haiyan is causing after massive destruction in the Philippines.

“Gold’s fragile floor is being tested,” wrote strategists at Citibank, led by Suki Cooper, in a note.

The much stronger-than-expected rise in October payrolls and the European Central Bank’s surprise rate cut last week helped push gold toward three-week lows. Stronger economic data reinforced ideas the Fed will begin to scale back its program of bond purchases.

Gold had rallied strongly in the wake of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, peaking in September 2011 at just under $2,000 an ounce. Gold’s gains were attributed in part to never realized fears that aggressive monetary easing by the Fed and other central banks would trigger a sharp spike in inflation, debasing paper currencies. Instead, central banks now find themselves more worried, on balance, about disinflationary pressures and the potential threat of deflation.

Meanwhile, physical gold demand remains softer than expected for this time of year, with demand in India subdued, the Citibank strategists noted.

Further rounds of stronger-than-expected macroeconomic data could expose gold to more weakness in the absence of support from the physical market, they said.

Ole Hansen, commodities strategist at Saxo Bank in Copenhagen, said bulls may take a modicum of solace from data showing that flows into gold exchange-traded products turned slightly positive last week after nine consecutive weeks of decline. “This potentially shows that institutional investors have now either left the metal or reduced their exposure to acceptable levels, which removes one of the key groups of sellers seen this past year,” Hansen said.

But a gold rebound still needs speculative traders, such as hedge funds, to step in, he said, noting that large speculators actually cut net long futures and options positions in the week ending Nov. 5.

Gold posted a 2.2% decline last week, extending its slide Friday in the wake of the jobs data.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 12:51:16

But oil is up today and the Feds will not stop propping up housing prices until gold takes off, you see you cannot win until Bill and I win big. Too bad for you.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 14:06:14

“…you see you cannot win until Bill and I win big. Too bad for you.”

Is this your own humble opinion, or did Rasmussen run a poll?

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 14:07:39

P.S. Don’t know about you, but evidently Bill is highly diversified, i.e. not foolishly putting all his beans in the ‘gold prices always go up’ basket.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 15:42:31

If you paid attention, you know that I have not placed on my eggs in a basket. And it is my opinion not Rasmussen.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 16:20:05

on=all

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 21:02:00

Why is the gold price tumbling again? Are Chindians getting the heebie-jeebies over getting stuck with falling knife PMs?

Gold - Electronic (COMEX) Dec 2013
Market closed
$1,278.00
Change -$3.10 -0.24%
Volume 10,627
Nov 11, 2013 10:50 p.m.
$ 1,281.10
Day low $1,276
Day high $1,282
Open: $1,281.40
52 week low $1,183
52 week high $1,765

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 23:37:29

What I wonder is, given how gold predictably bubbled up the slope of hope with the onset of quantitative easing in March 2009 straight up to its bubble-era peak of $1900, what leads gold bugs to believe it won’t simply retrace to under $1000 when QE3 is tapered away?

Or is the presumption there will not be a taper?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 12:31:18

The Feds don’t want to increase gasoline prices, they want to increase stock and housing prices. Thus, the low refinery margins are actually helping them prop up housing prices since it allows them to print money longer.

Comment by Neuromance
2013-11-11 12:53:14

Interesting point. The Fed has favored and non-favored sectors. Which means they have favored and non-favored consumers/citizens.

Too big to hail
China’s banking behemoths are too beholden to the state. It is time to set finance free
Aug 31st 2013
The Economist

AT FIRST sight, China seems to have a superb banking system.

[T]hat vaunted stability has come at a high price. China’s policy of financial repression, which forces households to endure artificially low interest rates on bank deposits so that subsidised capital can be lent to [State Owned Enterprises], is a cruel tax on ordinary people. [ed note.: But it raises nary a peep in the US and Europe.]

The size of China’s banks may seem impressive, but in fact it is a sign that the economy is excessively reliant on bank lending. And the incentives encouraging the risk-averse Big Four, whose bosses are leading figures in the Communist Party, to funnel lending to cronies at inefficient SOEs have starved dynamic “bamboo capitalists” of credit.

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21584342-chinas-banking-behemoths-are-too-beholden-state-it-time-set-finance-free-too-big

 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 14:42:39

Gasoline at $3.18/gal for regular (after $0.20 discount). Let’s see what the Fed can do to pump up those pump prices, in order to forestall deflation!

It’s not just deflation, we’re in an energy boom here in the US. The US has surpassed Saudi Arabia as the largest producer of oil and gas in the world. At the same time, many US car buyers are purchasing more fuel efficient vehicles and driving less. So decreased economic demand coupled with increased fuel efficiency and increased domestic supply should mean cheaper gas prices.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 15:50:51

But goon is not wrong. There are too many people in the world and they are placing pressure on all natural resources. While I have said for over 7 years that Co2 is only 1/7 the warming agent that the AGW models have assumed and the data is actual consistent with that, it only means that if we do not change things we will warm up in about 700 years to the point where they say we will warm up in 100 years. The difference really is just a blink of the eye in geologic time. However, since China only has about 35 years of coal at its present burn rate, China will not be able to put the same amount of co2 in the air. This shortage will be lead to general cost pressure before that happens. Similarly, the oil we are producing will reach a Mesa in the next few years so oil will rise in price even if the Middle East oil supply is not interrupted and that is an unlikely event over the next few years.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2013-11-11 16:12:26

Speaking of not being wrong just a few days ago, I talked about how Chicago was close to the financial edge. Just today Fitch has downgraded Chicago, the spiral to bankruptcy is well underway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2013-11-11 12:01:57

This reeks of Canadian self-congratulation, but I suppose could be exactly true. Still trying to digest…curious about other opinions.

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140162/charles-w-calomiris-and-stephen-h-haber/why-banking-systems-succeed-and-fail

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 13:14:42
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 13:21:59

How many millions of houses does Phoney and Fraudie conceal?

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 13:58:20

A few interesting numbers from the report:

The percentage of fixed rate loans is still very high at 97.7%…people have yet to use ARMs as a way to get to affordable payments the same way they did in 2004-2006, when the percentage of fixed rate loans was generally around 80%.

Also, loans made to investors has been on a steady rise, now at 9.1% of the loans they acquire…the highest number on the page. (page 6)

Serious Delinquency rate:
AZ: 1.26%
CA: 1.13%
FL: 7.60% (!!!)
NV: 4.7% (!!)

Overall average is 2.55%

CA and AZ are comprising a decreasing share of the overall credit losses, FL is a dramatically increasing share (last line of Page 10).

About a third of modified loans redefault within 2 years (page 15).

Total Inventory of REO (Page 17)
AZ, Year on year fell from 3,865 to 2,168
CA, Year on year fell from 9,448 to 5,100
FL, Year on year ROSE from 12,633 to 18,808
NV, Year on year fell from 1,335 to 1,201 (small change)

Comment by Suite Joey Blue Eyes
2013-11-11 14:19:05

more proof FL is the dumping ground for the Northeast.

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 14:53:34

NY and NJ aren’t all that pretty either…it’s just that Fannie doesn’t call them out specifically. Per LPS, non-current loan rates are:

FL: 15.2%
NJ: 14.7%
NY: 12.4%

This more of a judicial vs. non-judicial thing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2013-11-11 16:22:52

Californias foreclosure moratorium is the only reason Phoneys numbers are what they are.

How many millions of houses does Phoney and Fraudie conceal?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 14:11:17

Has it dawned on you all that the Dow Jones Industrial Average has hit a new record high on more than one day out of every ten in 2013?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2013-11-11 14:13:31

Nov. 11, 2013, 2:06 p.m. EST
U.S. stocks set sights on new record highs
By Victor Reklaitis, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks wavered between small gains and losses on Monday after a strong performance in the prior session that boosted the Dow industrials to a record close.

The market has gone up so far, and for so long, that many have begun to worry that a big decline can’t be too far away. Mark Hulbert discusses on MoneyBeat. Photo: Getty Images.

Investors are weighing encouraging Chinese economic reports that came out over the weekend and helped Asian and European equities. They are also continuing to digest Friday’s better-than-expected U.S. jobs report.

Bond traders have a holiday Monday thanks to Veterans Day, when there will also be no economic reports from the U.S. government.

“Today is going to be a pretty mild day when it comes to movements, just because we’re not going to see much in the way of data,” said Kristina Hooper, a U.S. investment strategist at Allianz Global Investors. “The lack of economic data points today may just cause further scrutiny of Friday’s jobs report.”

 
Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 14:33:24

The FED Pomo is strong.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 15:15:04

This is interesting, from the first Presidential debate transcript–to put Obama’s claims that “if you like your insurance you can keep it” into the context of the time. (The transcript is available via Google search on NPR’s website)

“PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, four years ago when I was running for office I was traveling around and having those same conversations that Governor Romney talks about. And it wasn’t just that small businesses were seeing costs skyrocket and they couldn’t get affordable coverage even if they wanted to provide it to their employees; it wasn’t just that this was the biggest driver of our federal deficit, our overall health care costs. But it was families who were worried about going bankrupt if they got sick — millions of families, all across the country.

If they had a pre-existing condition they might not be able to get coverage at all. If they did have coverage, insurance companies might impose an arbitrary limit. And so as a consequence, they’re paying their premiums, somebody gets really sick, lo and behold they don’t have enough money to pay the bills because the insurance companies say that they’ve hit the limit. So we did work on this alongside working on jobs, because this is part of making sure that middle-class families are secure in this country.

And let me tell you exactly what “Obamacare” did. Number one, if you’ve got health insurance it doesn’t mean a government take over. You keep your own insurance. You keep your own doctor. But it does say insurance companies can’t jerk you around. They can’t impose arbitrary lifetime limits. They have to let you keep your kid on their insurance — your insurance plan till you’re 26 years old. And it also says that they’re — you’re going to have to get rebates if insurance companies are spending more on administrative costs and profits than they are on actual care.

Number two, if you don’t have health insurance, we’re essentially setting up a group plan that allows you to benefit from group rates that are typically 18 percent lower than if you’re out there trying to get insurance on the individual market.

Now, the last point I’d make before —

MR. LEHRER: Two minutes —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: — before —

MR. LEHRER: Two minutes is up, sir.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: No, I — I think I’ve — I had five seconds before you interrupted me — was — (laughter) — that the irony is that we’ve seen this model work really well in Massachusetts, because Governor Romney did a good thing, working with Democrats in the state to set up what is essentially the identical model. And as a consequence, people are covered there. It hasn’t destroyed jobs. And as a consequence, we now have a system in which we have the opportunity to start bringing down cost, as opposed to just —

MR. LEHRER: Your five —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: — leaving millions of people out in the cold.

MR. LEHRER: Your five seconds went away a long time ago. (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT OBAMA: That —

MR. LEHRER: All right, Governor. Governor, tell the — tell the president directly why you think what he just said is wrong about “Obamacare.”

MR. ROMNEY: Well, I did with my first statement.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: You did.

MR. ROMNEY: But I’ll go on.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Please elaborate.

MR. ROMNEY: I’ll elaborate.

Exactly right.

First of all, I like the way we did it in Massachusetts. I like the fact that in my state, we had Republicans and Democrats come together and work together. What you did instead was to push through a plan without a single Republican vote. As a matter of fact, when Massachusetts did something quite extraordinary, elected a Republican senator to stop “Obamacare,” you pushed it through anyway. So entirely on a partisan basis, instead of bringing America together and having a discussion on this important topic, you pushed through something that you and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid thought was the best answer and drove it through.

What we did, in a legislature 87 percent Democrat, we worked together. Two hundred legislators in my legislature — only two voted against the plan by the time we were finished.

What were some differences?

We didn’t raise taxes. You’ve raised them by a trillion dollars under “Obamacare.” We didn’t cut Medicare. Of course, we don’t have Medicare, but we didn’t cut Medicare by $716 billion. We didn’t put in place a board that can tell people ultimately what treatments they’re going to receive.

We didn’t — we didn’t also do something that I think a number of people across this country recognize, which is put — put people in a position where they’re going to lose the insurance they had and they wanted. Right now, the CBO says up to 20 million people will lose their insurance as “Obamacare” goes into effect next year. And likewise, a study by McKinsey & Company of American businesses said 30 percent of them are anticipating dropping people from coverage. So for those reasons, for the tax, for Medicare, for this board and for people losing their insurance, this is why the American people don’t want — don’t want “Obamacare.” It’s why Republicans said, do not do this.

And the Republicans had a — had a plan. They put a plan out. They put out a plan, a bipartisan plan. It was swept aside. I think something this big, this important has to be done in a bipartisan basis. And we have to have a president who can reach across the aisle and fashion important legislation with the input from both parties.”

Comment by Northeastener
2013-11-11 18:40:49

Libtards keep pointing to MA as an example of success… we have, to date, the most expensive health care of any state in the union.

Healthcare costs

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 18:48:50

BTW, I wasn’t bringing up the quote for any other reason to note that the current debacle was predicted by “Baahh, Romney”.

Question on the map though, NE, is that spending per person? Or per INSURED person?

Seems like spending per capita would naturally go up if you have a higher percentage of the population insured.

Comment by Rental Watch
2013-11-11 19:10:56

BTW, “predicted” is the wrong word…the problem was “raised” by Romney in the debates.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2013-11-11 16:58:25

We had a warm sunny day today up in eastern Washington, which was really out of place since the skies have been overcast and damp since our first snow. The pattern has been milder winters.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2013-11-11 21:37:40

Those older people from the Wussie generation:

College Students On Probation For Pulling Gun To Defend Against Intruder

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/11/11/college_students_on_probation_pulling_gun_to_defend_against_intruder_.html

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post