January 6, 2014

An Overheated, Investor-Driven Market

The Phnom Penh Post reports on Cambodia. “A new report by SBI Royal Securities is taking a bullish view on the investment potential of Phnom Penh condominiums for high net-worth locals and residents or investors from overseas. Prime real estate in major cities in Cambodia was at the more affordable end of the spectrum, averaging $3,200 per square metre, the same as Indonesia, and just slightly more expensive than Malaysia at $2,800 per square metre. De Castle Royal condominiums development are currently selling for between $130,000 and $950,000 depending on size and amenities. ‘High-class facilities, luxury high-end furnishings and excellent interior and exterior designs are of course key attractive elements of De Castle Royal,’ said SBI Royal Securities senior associate Leng Vandy.”

The Sydney Morning Herald in Australia. “Tiffany Liu, 27, is a Shanghai socialite who wants to buy a house in Sydney by the water and in the coolest neighbourhood. Her budget is between $2 million and $5 million. Jack Yin is the head of property development company Brandmont, based in Hebei province. He is looking for investment opportunities that could double as a small holiday home for his family and friends. Ms Liu and Mr Yin were joined this week by about 6000 similarly cashed-up shoppers at the Luxury Properties Showcase in Shanghai to browse some of the world’s most expensive homes.”

“‘It is China’s private individuals who are the biggest investors in Australia,’ said Adam Wu, chief operating officer at China Business Network. ‘Our personal savings are the highest in the world. ‘We have private savings worth $US10 trillion and that money needs to be invested somewhere, and the property restrictions to only one house for each family makes Australian property an attractive option.’”

The Epoch Times. “China’s skyrocketing housing prices are driven mainly by the Chinese regime’s policies, which help Communist Party members make huge profits by selling off land and by the investment of speculative hot money. Foreign currency must be exchanged to the Chinese yuan before it can be used for investment in China. Data from the Central Bank of China shows that at the end of of third quarter in 2013, the funds outstanding for foreign exchange reached 27.51 trillion yuan (approximately US$4.5 trillion).”

“Zhang Tingbin, founder of CNYUAN Thinktank, said after speculative hot money was converted to the Chinese yuan, it went to the financial institutes first. Then, the commercial banks would increase their lending efforts, in turn boosting the already high housing price. The relation between the commercial banks and the real estates is that they are connected with wealth investment products and trusts. Within this model, real estate developers and speculators all get what they want. Speculators get a 5 to 15 percent return, sometimes as high as a 20 percent annual return, with additional profits from the appreciation of the Chinese yuan.”

“At the same time, local governments reduced the supply of available lands. The resulting higher land price would in turn drive up the housing price. So in brief, speculators, real estate developers, banks, and local governments are working seamlessly together to raise housing prices, and then pass on the additional costs to the house buyers.”

Want China Times. “Taiwan’s finance minister, Chang Sheng-ford, warned that the country’s property prices are too expensive, and the property bubble may burst any time, reports our sister paper China Times. The possible housing bubbles will focus on those areas with high vacant housing rate such as Taipei, New Taipei, Taoyuan and Taichung, he said.”

“Sway (pseudonym), a local property expert, questioned the government’s actions, however. ‘Since the government knows it, why does it do nothing?’ he said, adding that Taipei’s property prices have tripled in the past 10 years.”

From DNA India. “Shashank Jain, executive director, PwC India, says the housing sector is facing many perils. Q: Only property investors might reap higher returns. But end-users incur rental and EMI (equated monthly instalment) expenses while fighting inflation. A: Yes, end-users are significantly impacted. Unfortunately, majority of buyers are not end-users. It’s a vicious circle. Investors are indifferent to project delays as they help them get better appreciation.”

“According to quarterly home registration data, a large proportion of transactions is secondary sales. In any micro market, if the secondary rates are Rs1,000 to Rs1,500 per square foot lower than what the developer is offering, that’s a clear sign of an overheated market, an investor-driven market.”

The Financial Post. “Douglas Porter, chief economist at Toronto-based BMO Capital Markets, said the Bank of Canada under governor Stephen Poloz has ‘learned to live with high home prices. After years of scolding Canadians and warning about the perils of record debt levels, the bank was flatly calling for a soft landing in housing by the end of the year, and downplaying talk of a bubble.’”

From First Post. “So what explains such fast rise in real estate prices all over the world? Most of the western world is going through a phase of very low economic growth. Given this incomes haven’t been rising. In fact, they have been falling. Given this, it is only fair to say that there is a housing bubble on. And the only possible explanation for it is the easy money policy run by governments and central banks all over the Western world to revive economic growth.”

“It needs to be pointed out here is that land is really not an issue in countries like United States and Australia. And this reflects in the numbers as well. As Alan S. Blinder writes in After the Music Stopped ‘The historical comparison reveals a stunning—and virtually unknown—fact: On balance, the relative prices of houses in America barely changed over more than a century! To be precise, the average annual relative price increase from 1890 to 1997 was just 0.09 percent.’”

“In the United States, the 20 City S&P/ Case- Shiller Home Price Index, the leading measure of US home prices, rose by 13.6% in October 2013, in comparison to a year earlier. Prices in London have also been going up at a very high rate. As Albert Edwards of Societe Generale writes in a recent note titled Here we go again…and once again no-one is listening.”

The Canadian Free Press on the UK. “The Conservative Government’s help-to-buy scheme may be well intentioned, but it runs the risk of fuelling a housing bubble as property values rise and banks lend more aggressively because of lower risk. The likelihood is that prices will be forced upward and that some householders will have bitten off more than they can chew. As a result government money will have to be diverted to the banks. This threatens to produce a repeat of the economic catastrophe seen in 2008.”

“The higher housing market will then become unsustainable, people will find themselves underwater in their loans, and a whole new housing crisis will be ready to kick-off. Politicians will meanwhile blame one another. Government needs to leave the marketplace alone. Only when that happens will prices reach their proper levels and people will pay what they can afford, with lenders loaning money based on appropriate risk.”




RSS feed

42 Comments »

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 05:51:15

“Seattle WA Median Housing Prices Down 18% Since April 2013″

http://www.movoto.com/statistics/wa/seattle.htm

Comment by Janet Felon
2014-01-06 10:59:17

The “listing price” is down, not median sold prices. For the record, sold prices are up YOY.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 11:20:23

Both parameters in the movoto table are median list prices. And both have been in decline since April as I stated. It’s a substantial change of trend due to the fact it began in April when prices are under pressure.

 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-01-06 17:20:32

Take a zillow sweep over the seattle area. You need to zoom in a couple levels to see them all, as it culls listings from the bigger areas so as not to completely flood the window. Not only is the number of listings striking, so is the percentage of them that are foreclosures. I’ve been hearing for over a year about how things are ‘picking up in Seattle’, but if that’s so, why so many listings, and so many forclosures?

I do want to buy a house, so I’ve been watching the listings for the last year or so, and about 10% of the properties in my area have had one or more price cuts, yet they’re still on the market 300 days later. Recently those DOM numbers are being reset too. I know some of these listings like old friends, and a new listing date catches my eye.

Where are the bidding warriors?

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-01-06 19:17:58

‘Since March’s record low, the supply of homes for sale in the Seattle metro area has steadily climbed. Not coincidentally, the rate of bidding wars has plunged, according to data from Seattle-based Redfin, an online real-estate brokerage.’

‘In November, about 43 percent of offers submitted by Redfin agents for home shoppers faced competition, down from 75 percent in April.’

‘For the next five years, inventory should gradually grow, Pierson said. The rebound in home prices has lifted thousands of homeowners out of negative equity, freeing them to sell their houses and wipe out mortgage debt. In King County, one of out six homes with a mortgage was in negative equity at the end of September, down from a peak of one in three in March 2012, according to Seattle-based Zillow, the online real-estate marketplace.’

‘Also, new-home construction is edging back up. Through October, there were 7,560 permits for new single-family homes in the Seattle metro area.’

I don’t buy this:

‘freeing them to sell their houses’

Like we’re seeing in Phoenix and Las Vegas, the motivation is more likely that these people think prices have peaked, whatever their situation. For instance, in Vegas, the MLS is being flooded with short sales and non-short sales. Even the banks are getting in on the action. Here in Flagstaff foreclosures jumped up in the week before Christmas, which is unheard of in the biz.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-01-06 19:41:17

I want to buy a house too. I’m already thinking about landscaping, architectural designs, painting/contrast techniques, and roofs. I want wood floors and some sort of perfect countertop that is easy to clean and won’t crack.

And I want it all for NUTTIN, and ima get it.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 20:19:11

It’s almost along the lines of “I’m not gonna give it away”.

There’s an expectation that the price should be retail +100%+ whenever the phrase is invoked.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 05:52:31

“Sacramento Housing Prices Crumble 11% Since July 2013″

http://www.movoto.com/statistics/ca/sacramento.htm

Comment by Puggs
2014-01-06 14:58:54

So how much downwind radiation from Fukushima is falling on Cali these days anyways??

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 17:31:21

I’m wagering everything in the ocean on the coast is lit up pretty good. Not long after that, everything on the ground gets fried.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 05:55:08

“Moorpark, CA Housing Prices Down 26% Since 2010″

http://www.movoto.com/statistics/ca/moorpark.htm#city=&time=5Y&metric=Median%20L

Comment by cactus
2014-01-06 12:28:10

Moorpark’s home resale inventories decreased sharply, with a 23 percent decrease since December 2014. Distressed properties such as foreclosures and short sales decreased as a percentage of the total market in January. The median listing price in Moorpark went up from December to January. There were a total of 0 price increases and 1 price decreases.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 13:55:19

I think their editor was out sick that day.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 05:57:27

“Simi Valley CA Housing Prices Fall 14% in 2013; Declines accelerating”

http://www.movoto.com/statistics/ca/simi-valley.htm

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 06:00:28

“Irvine, CA Housing Inventory Balloons 113%; Housing Demand Collapses”

http://www.movoto.com/statistics/ca/irvine.htm

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 06:01:41

“Granite Bay CA Housing Prices Collapse 20% Year Over Year; Inventory Skyrockets 53%

http://www.movoto.com/statistics/ca/granite-bay.htm

Comment by Puggs
2014-01-06 12:30:16

2 Bad for Cali!!! 2 Bad if you bought in the last 2 years too!

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 13:56:22

You’re correct. I maintain you’ve got a serious problem if you bought a house in the last 15 years. A very serious problem.

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-01-06 19:44:33

It depends on how much you paid for the house, relative to rents.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 20:16:47

If you bought it in the last 15 years, we know exactly what you paid.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
 
Comment by Martin
2014-01-06 06:42:53

The US Fed taper could have controlled the RE bubbles across the world. But the taper they announced is hopeless. Maybe in the coming months when the Fed tapers by another 30-40b, we might see steam coming out of those RE markets with their currencies declining.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-01-06 07:28:52

‘SINGAPORE: Private residential property prices fell for the first time in about two years in the fourth quarter of 2013, according to flash estimates released by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). Other data released on Thursday showed that Housing and Development Board (HDB) resale flat prices continued to decline for the second consecutive quarter in the last three months of 2013.’

‘The numerous measures to cool the housing market seem to be taking effect.’

‘Norwegian banks need to raise capital levels further to protect the economy amid signs the housing market in Scandinavia’s richest nation is deflating, the central bank said.’

“Norwegian banks’ capital adequacy ratios have increased, but banks must strengthen their equity capital further if they are to be in a position to withstand large losses without serious consequences for the Norwegian economy,” Governor Oeystein Olsen said in a statement.’

‘According to experts, developers and brokers, this festive season saw the worst period after the global recession struck in 2008-09. Instead of high demand and blockbuster sales characteristic of the period, developers had to resort to freebies and discount schemes to lure customers. And yet, the season, which normally accounts for as much as 25 per cent of the total annual sales of houses, remained sluggish.’

“This has been one of the worst years in the realty sector… sales are down, inventory is high and prices have peaked,” says Pankaj Kapoor, managing director, Liases Foras, a real estate research firm. “There is a wide gap between affordability and pricing, which is why sales are not happening.”

‘Although Vancouver has a reputation as one of the most expensive cities in North America for housing, condo prices stayed flat or even dropped last year, according to recently released assessment numbers. Recently released figures from the B.C. Assessment Authority show that values of, for example, two-bedroom condos in Vancouver were down by almost $20,000 from the previous year in all parts of the city, whether it was on the west side (where a two-bedroom that was assessed at $599,000 in 2013 is now assessed at $571,000 for 2014), the east side ($383,000 now assessed at $364,000) or downtown.’

‘Other parts of the region saw assessments for various types of condos drop by anywhere from a few hundred dollars to as much as $14,000.’

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-01-06 07:48:31

‘Sydney’s pre-Christmas rush will take on an added dimension on Saturday with the extraordinary extended spring auction season climaxing with a record listing just shy of 1000. An estimated 995 homeowners have put their properties on the market this weekend, pushing festive preparations into the background as they seek to tap into an auction market that has had records breaking every week for the past few months.’

‘Yet eastern suburbs agent Alex Phillips worried a lot of buyers might have ‘’switched off” and clearance rates could plummet. ”You’re probably missing 50 per cent of your market, at least,” he said. ”Most of the people who are selling now [are doing so] because they have to, because they’ve already bought and they’re trying to match up their settlements.”

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-01-06 18:21:33

from the India article:

experts say that this is indeed the right time to buy a property. Says Rahul Gaur…Reserve Bank of India’s tough measures to tame inflation mean interest rates will not come down in the next one year at least. So, any expectation of a price crash or correction is an argument that defies merit.”

Apparently this manic idea that higher interest rates mean higher house prices is alive on the other side of the planet as well.

Deflation is going to be the biggest surprise ever, and everywhere.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 07:31:48

It’s already leaking and the hole is enlarging.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-01-06 19:47:17

Is the stock market going to crash heartily?

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-01-06 08:41:40

“Pending Home Sales Plunge At Fastest Pace Since April 2011″

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-30/pending-home-sales-plunge-fastest-pace-april-2011

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
 
Comment by Janet Felon
2014-01-06 10:23:25

“Tiffany Liu, 27, is a Shanghai socialite who wants to buy a house in Sydney by the water and in the coolest neighbourhood[sic]. Her budget is between $2 million and $5 million.”

Hot money of sorts. The world we currently live in is a ridiculous joke, IMO.

Comment by snake charmer
2014-01-06 12:05:31

I agree one hundred percent. And the comment in that piece about “savings” is laugh-out-loud funny. Drug lords have savings too. Somebody should advise them to invest that cash in Australian real estate. Maybe they already have.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-01-06 10:24:09

‘An economist on Monday raised the specter of a real-estate bubble in the Philippines if the property sector continues its high-speed growth of 15 percent to 20 percent in the medium term. In a briefing UA&P Associate Prof. Victor Abola said the growth of the real-estate sector, while a positive sign that the economy is also growing, could still be a threat to the country’s economic growth in the next three to five years.’

“There’s an oversupply in the higher-end of the spectrum, but it’s a very small percentage, it’s about 5 percent to 10 percent. However, the reports we get is that banks are already starting to feel past dues and defaults and, of course, that needs more stringent requirements, apart from the bank, the BSP [Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas], which is what we’ve been calling for since a year ago,” Abola said.’

‘A bursting of a real-estate bubble would immediately lead to huge simultaneous drops in property prices. This, in turn, would immediately affect owners of property assets who would be left with assets having values much less than the time these were bought. As investors see the value of their investment getting exposed to higher risks, the option of pulling out of the market becomes attractive. The pullout further feeds the beast, and the bursting of the bubble then leads to a financial crisis, as banks and creditors would be left holding soured assets.’

“When real-estate companies start off with zero interest rate and zero down payment, then that’s a harbinger of possible trouble. [But] I think the bubble will be avoided [since] the banks have learned from the Asian Financial Crisis,” Abola said.’

 
Comment by taxpayers
2014-01-06 10:27:45

motovo data is week- they show 10%? of activity

penom penn- if the bubble pops they now what to do- to the fileds !

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-01-06 19:49:27

What?

Comment by Bronco
2014-01-06 23:16:16

think she means ‘the killing fields’

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-01-06 10:36:40

‘China’s getting tough on risky off-balance-sheet lending. While recognizing shadow banking as an indispensable part of the financial market, the country’s cabinet has published new rules aimed at reining in the rampant growth of shadow banking, various media reports said. The move will inevitably drive credit growth further lower in 2014. And, as a result, so will the overall economic growth.’

‘There are a number of harsh rules, targeting a number of major drivers of China’s credit growth in the past few years. For instance, in a notice dated March 25, the China Banking Regulatory Commission said banks must clearly link wealth-management products with the assets that proceeds are invested in. Separately, trust firms will likely face much tighter capital rules when conducting credit intermediation. These two items alone can lead to notable slowdown in credit growth, if implemented strictly, according to Yao.’

“The key to a less painful deleveraging path is to divert credit away from the inefficient part of the Chinese economy that is also insensitive to interest rates, such as local governments and some state-owned enterprises,” Yao said.’

‘An official audit released last week showed that China’s local government debt reached 17.9 trillion yuan ($2.95 trillion) at end-June 2013, or up from 10.7 trillion at end-2010.’

‘A financial drama is unfolding in China as the new year begins. Last week, for the second time in six months, interest rates in the critical interbank lending market spiked above 10%, prompting fears of a liquidity crisis that would trigger mass defaults and cripple the world’s second largest economy. Western investors largely ignored the cash crunch and failed to grasp its potential significance.’

‘To those who wrote off China’s first banking seizure in June as a fluke, this latest episode appeared to come out of nowhere. They cast about for explanations…With inflation at manageable levels, they reasoned, PBOC had plenty of room to loosen monetary policy again and ease the cash crunch.’

‘In fact, loose monetary policy is the problem, not the solution. Two simple words—bad debt—are the key to understanding why China has too much money, yet not enough…Total debt has risen sharply, from 125% of GDP in 2008 to 215% in 2012. Credit has spiralled to $24 trillion from $9 trillion at the end of 2008. That’s an additional $15 trillion—the size of the entire US commercial banking sector—lent out in just five years.’

‘A lot of that money has gone into projects whose purpose was to inflate the country’s economic statistics, not to generate a return. Officially, China’s banks report a non-performing loan ratio of less than 1%. In reality, they are rolling over huge amounts of bad debt, both on their own books and by repackaging it into retail investment products— many of them extremely short-term.’

‘China’s banks can hide bad debt by playing this shell game, yet that doesn’t change the fact that they’re not getting their money back. With their capital locked up in existing projects, the only way they can finance the next round of big investments—and keep China’s GDP growth rates from collapsing—is by expanding credit. More and more of that new credit is now eaten up paying imaginary returns on the growing pile of bad debt.’

It’s interesting how this keeps coming up:

‘that doesn’t change the fact that they’re not getting their money back’

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-01-06 10:41:25

Oh dear.

‘Due to the credit crunch at Chinese banks at the turn of the year, many Taiwanese-invested enterprises in China have been forced to resort to underground financiers, driving up the latter’s interest to nearly 200% per annum.’

‘One Taiwanese businessman said that Taiwanese businesses cannot borrow loans from their peers this year, as “everyone is short of cash.”

‘The share of loans extended through financing outside mainstream avenues, that is to say shadow banks, in the overall loan structure in China is continually shooting upwards. The interest rate for loans extended by legal private financiers has also topped 40% per annum. A Hong Kong-based private loaning institution, for instance, is charging borrowers at a rate four times the legal ceiling, or 6% per annum. After taking consulting fees into account, the fee levels at 50%, according to Din Pengyun, chairman of the company. The company’s loans typically have a term of only two weeks.’

‘Many analysts and investors worry that China’s economic slowdown may trigger a debt crisis, at a time when loans from shadow banks are still expanding. According to the central bank, only 53% of total loans were supplied by banks in the first 10 months of 2013, down from 72% in 2010 and 92% in 2012. The expansion of shadow banking has led to a growing stockpile of high-risk loans and boosted housing prices, augmenting the downside risk for the Chinese credit market.’

Comment by Janet Felon
2014-01-06 13:44:08

Black Swan breeding ground.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-01-06 18:24:00

Congrats!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-01-06 18:34:37

It isn’t really a black swan. It is in plain sight. It isn’t new. It isn’t different. It is just bigger and uglier and more lethal and contagious than ever.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by snake charmer
2014-01-06 12:13:00

Buy now in Cambodia or be priced out forever. You know, the Khmer Rouge only officially dissolved two decades ago.

What gets me is that all history now pales besides perceived real estate investment opportunities. You’d think that expropriation risk and a Third World justice system, not to mention the possibility of death, would act as a damper on speculative activity. You would be wrong. How long before the killing fields are the scene of development? Trump will put up a condo tower.

Comment by Janet Felon
2014-01-06 13:48:34

I hear Rwanda is in, baby. And if that ain’t your thing, there’s some mortar blasted dirt parcels for sale in Lebanon. I hear they’re zoned for multi-family.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post