March 11, 2014

Let’s Get Used To This, You’re Going To Lose Money

The Calgary Herald reports from Canada. “Prospective Canadian homebuyers are more willing to enter into a bidding war this year for properties they want to purchase, says a new report by BMO. Mike Fotiou, associate broker with First Place Realty, said Calgarians were so determined to buy a home in February that nearly one in five paid above the asking price. ‘Of the 1,854 properties that sold during the month, 364 or 19.6 per cent of buyers paid higher than list price. Compare that to the 10.4 per cent of buyers from a year ago or the 6.1 per cent from February 2012 that paid above asking,’ Fotiou wrote.”

“Laura Parsons, mortgage expert with BMO Bank of Montreal, said the competition for real estate in Canada, particularly in hotter markets, can be fierce and turn into an emotional frenzy. ‘It’s such an emotional thing. When you see it, you get it. I remember the days when there were lineups of people behind each other. The minute you see that your heart starts to race and you want to not lose,’ said Parson of the Calgary market.”

The Financial Post. “Could developers faced with a glut of condominiums turn to apartments? Real estate brokerage Rock Advisors Inc. is predicting that the number of purpose-built apartments will grow in 2014 as developers look elsewhere for income. Derek Lobo, chief executive of Rock Advisors, says purpose-built rental apartments avoided the 2008 recession and continue to outperform all other sectors of the real estate market. He noted the 36,186 housing units started in Toronto were up from the month before and he says apartments starts have helped bolster the housing market.”

“‘The heated housing markets are why apartments will do better in 2014,’ says Mr. Lobo. ‘More and more Canadians are finding the high cost of home ownership isn’t what it’s cracked up to be. Even with condominiums, the cost of maintaining a mortgage and paying condominium fees presents an ownership premium of 10% over what it costs to rent an apartment.’”

From CBC News. “TD Bank economists Derek Burleton and Diana Petramala said people’s obsession with house prices in the Toronto area has obscured the differences between various subsections of the market: the 905 area versus the 416; detached houses versus condos; and new builds versus existing homes. ‘One market is facing too much supply, while another appears to be heating up,’ the bank said.”

“So many new condos are being built that the sale prices are being cannibalized by those that came before. The average price of a new condo is $545,000, TD Bank said. But prices for existing condos are much lower — $347,000, on average. Older condos are also generally larger — the average unit size in 2005 was 925 square feet, but had shrunk to 798 square feet in January.”

“The bank also sounds a modest alarm about the market for investors who rent out their units. Recent estimates are that 26 per cent of the condos in Toronto aren’t owner-occupied, but rather are rented out — at an average cost of $1,700 a month, the report said. Investors face more of a risk to flip and sell their units upon completion, and are less likely to ride out a cold market if prices decline. ‘It is likely that a good portion of these rented units will ultimately end up on the market,’ the bank said.”

From Global News. “TD Economics is basing the fresh assessment on the fact that a whopping 70,000 units are set to be completed this year and next – a number the bank calls ’striking’ — at a time when buyer demand for new units already appears to be ‘dwindling,’ the bank said. ‘While a majority of these units have been sold, roughly 9,000 of the units remain to be absorbed,’ the report said.”

“But even among sold units, some suggest an unknown number of owners or investors are facing challenges when it comes time to securing a final loan to close the deal and take ownership. There’s some emerging (if anecdotal) evidence that some buyers who put down a small deposit a few years ago on a yet-to-be built unit are now facing unforeseen problems securing a loan to cover the remaining balance now that lending conditions have tightened.”

“‘They put their deposit down four or five years ago and then they’re ready to register the unit and get a mortgage and they’re walking into tough times,’ a Toronto broker told industry website Mortgagebrokernews.ca last month.”

“Experts says a pronounced downturn in Toronto’s condo segment could have farther-reaching effects on the regional economy and beyond. With tens of thousands of jobs in construction and financial services tied to the market, the Bank of Canada has specifically cited Toronto’s inflating condo sector as a potential source of concern.”

The Metro News. “Unemployment in Toronto — at 8.4 per cent — is higher than in any of the main Canadian metropolitan areas reviewed by TD Economics’ Metro Beat report. Housing starts were down 30 per cent in 2013, according to Metro Beat, and they’re expected to drop another 20 per cent in 2014 and an additional 7.4 per cent in 2015. ‘The market is largely overbuilt … and there is a lot in the pipeline right now,’ said Sonny Scarfone, a TD economic analyst. ‘We can expect a pullback in construction as the market will need to absorb all the supply.’”

The Ottawa Sun. “Elizabeth Bannerman has heard all the statistics, the dire forecasts and the tempered expectations for the so-called ‘deep freeze’ in the Ottawa condo market. But as she prepares to place her two hotspot properties on the market, she’s undeterred. ‘Yes, prices have leveled out because of the overstock, but places that are well-maintained and priced positively are still selling,’ she says.”

“Sellers like Bannerman who snapped up properties during the record-setting condo boom of the last two years are having to work harder than ever to move their units, with the Ottawa market — once as stable as they come — now experiencing an almost unheard-of cooling period. Condo inventory is at an all-time high — one in five completed units is now sitting unsold — and a stagnant market, coupled with unprecedented uncertainty among buyers, is having a significant impact on prices.”

“Simply put, developers jumping on the condo boom bandwagon built too high, too fast, too soon. While developers are either slowing construction starts or shifting gears, a number of high profile dwellings are still in various states of completion across the city. That’s troubling for agents like Martin Elder of Keller Williams, who has been around the block long enough to recall when homes used to sell for under $20,000, yet still marvels at the developers ‘who have just flooded the market.’”

“‘The ones that have been newly built from Westboro to Beechwood, they’re still going up,’ says Elder. ‘How can these things keep going up?’”

“Elder currently counts a handful of clients who jumped into the condo market with both feet during the boom, only to be left with cold feet two short years later. ‘They got in for the right reasons, but life got in the way and now they have to sell, but they can’t sell. They’re expecting to recoup the price they bought it at, plus fees and what-not, but it’s just not possible. I’ve been telling them, ‘Let’s get used to this, you’re going to lose money.’”




RSS feed

62 Comments »

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 04:51:05

‘Let’s Get Used To This, You’re Going To Lose Money’

Losing money is a fact when it comes to depreciating assets like houses. It becomes a lot of money when bought in the current environment where housing prices are massively inflated. The losses become irrecoverable when they’re financed.

Comment by Furlow
2014-03-11 15:56:18

How much do you lose when renting?

Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-03-11 16:11:40

Certainly not as much as when you buy, or when sleeping outside in the elements while getting your head bashed in by opportunists on a regular basis.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 17:06:42

Realtors are Liars Furlow. ;)

 
 
Comment by pazuzu
2014-03-11 16:16:01

This Realtor must be extremely desperate to resort to the truth. Of course the whole truth is still missing: “You’re going to lose money, but I’ll still make that sweet commish!! CHACHING.”

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 06:42:32

Encino, CA Housing Prices Crater 25% YoY; Inventory Balloons 43%

http://www.movoto.com/encino-ca/market-trends/

Comment by polly
2014-03-11 07:13:13

median price per square foot up 3% (today’s median house size is 2139 square feet, a year ago it was 3033 square feet)

Comment by Blue Skye
2014-03-11 07:18:15

Apparently there is a lot of air under those 3000 ft2 houses that nobody wants.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 07:20:46

Attributed to what? A larger garage? A pool? Fencing? Basement? Finished basement? Newer house v. older house?

Yeah, I certainly believe that a new house is worth more than an old house don’t you?

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 06:47:06

Long Beach, CA Housing Prices Dive 13%; Excess Inventory Skyrockets 55%

http://www.movoto.com/long-beach-ca/market-trends/

Comment by Puggs
2014-03-11 08:35:16

Poor, poor So. Calli’s who bought last year and thought it’s different there. Better load up on Zanax.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-03-11 06:47:40

“The average price of a new condo is $545,000…for investors who rent out their units… average cost of $1,700 a month…”

Wow, that’s 320 months of rent just to recoup the purchase price, without fees, taxes, interest. Just wow.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-03-11 08:09:40

They are obviously counting on appreciation, because from a cash flow perspective it sure doesn’t pencil out.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 08:12:01

Make it up on volume?

‘as she prepares to place her two hotspot properties on the market, she’s undeterred’

Comment by In Colorado
2014-03-11 10:10:28

“Undeterred?” LOL. If there are no buyers, there are no buyers. End of story.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 10:18:36

undeterred = not going to give it away.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 06:54:17

‘Housing is a lynch pin in the generational divide. After adjusting for inflation, average housing values have nearly doubled. For those who bought homes decades ago, higher prices mean more wealth.’

‘But what’s been good for a generations of seniors and those heading into retirement has been bad for their kids and grandchildren. Statistics Canada data show that the typical 25 to 34 year old working full-time must pay far higher housing prices with wages that are 11 per cent (or about $3 per hour) lower than the same aged person in 1976. This is pushing the dream of home ownership out of reach for many younger Canadians, or saddling them with very heavy debts compared to a generation ago, even though today’s down payment often purchases a smaller yard, a Condo, or requires a longer commute.’

‘Young people’s wages are losing ground, despite the fact they are twice as likely to have post-secondary education compared to a generation ago. To cope, we have seen many young people adapt by devoting more time to the labour market, which is a major reason why there has been a dramatic shift toward dual earner households. But after adjusting for inflation, two young people still bring home little more than what one breadwinner often did in the mid-1970s. The result? Generations under age 45 are squeezed.Squeezed for time at home. Squeezed for money, because they pay higher tuition and housing prices with lower wages.’

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 06:57:10

“After adjusting for inflation, average housing values have nearly doubled.”

Yet tripled in the US.

Does anyone believe wages are going to triple in order to soak up all the excess empty inventory at these inflated prices? Of course not. Prices will dive to meet wages. In fact the process has already resumed.

Look out below.

Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-03-11 08:35:56

All they have to do is raise the minimum wage 3 bucks and everything will be peachy-keen!

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-03-11 07:22:06

Just like Californians, Canadians have impoverished themselves in a manic frenzy of debt.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 07:41:28

California Most Impoverish State In The US

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_poverty_rate

(geography adjusted)

(Is there a question as to why there are millions of excess empty and defaulted houses in that state?)

Comment by Rental Watch
2014-03-11 12:35:09

Geographic adjustment = local cost of living adjustment (including housing costs)

If there is abundant housing in CA, why is it so expensive?

If your answer is “low interest rates”, why don’t other states (who have the same low interest rates) have the same ridiculously high prices (relative to incomes)?

If your answer is “they” are hiding all the inventory, where are they hiding it?

Why doesn’t it show up as vacant housing, as it does in other states?

Why doesn’t it show up as non-current loans (ie. shadow inventory) as it does in other states?

Are “they” counting things differently in CA as opposed to other states? How do you know this is the case?

What about states that exhibit similar vacancy/non-current characteristics as CA, are they too being treated differently in terms of the data collection? Or do those states actually have low vacancy/low levels of distress?

I realize you won’t answer any of these questions, but I think people need to be asking themselves these kinds of questions (and doing their best to answer them) if they want to gain an understanding of the difference between the states.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Neuromance
2014-03-11 15:16:34

If there is abundant housing in CA, why is it so expensive?

I saw house prices skyrocket in Baltimore City in the early-mid 2000s. I’d heard it postulated that it too was lack of supply. However… population had been falling in Baltimore City for decades. So, it seemed like it was something other than a lack supply for residents. Loose lending drives up house prices as well.

I don’t know what the story is in CA. But increasing house prices does not necessarily indicate lack of supply. Increasing tulip bulb prices does not necessarily mean a lack of tulip bulbs and increasing stock prices doesn’t necessarily mean a lack of stocks. When there’s a lot of speculation in an asset, that tends to drive prices higher as well.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 17:18:42

If there is abundant housing in CA, why is it so expensive?

If your answer is “low interest rates”, why don’t other states (who have the same low interest rates) have the same ridiculously high prices (relative to incomes)?

Because other states do have ‘ridiculously high prices. (Did you think your were going to roll that one under the door? ;) )

If your answer is “they” are hiding all the inventory, where are they hiding it?

It’s not hidden. It’s right there in front of everyone including you. YOur denial is blinding you.

Why doesn’t it show up as vacant housing, as it does in other states?

It’s not count in other states either.

Why doesn’t it show up as non-current loans (ie. shadow inventory) as it does in other states?

You keep asking the same question and you’ll get the same answer. They’re set aside via moratoriums and other legislation.

Are “they” counting things differently in CA as opposed to other states? How do you know this is the case?
They are? This is your assertion.

What about states that exhibit similar vacancy/non-current characteristics as CA, are they too being treated differently in terms of the data collection? Or do those states actually have low vacancy/low levels of distress?

We’re not aware of any states exhibiting low vacancy.

I realize you won’t answer any of these questions, but I think people need to be asking themselves these kinds of questions (and doing their best to answer them) if they want to gain an understanding of the difference between the states.

As always, we’ll always respond and counter with the truth.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2014-03-11 17:45:42

I recognize that prices going up doesn’t automatically mean that there is a shortage of supply (the converse is also true, that falling prices doesn’t automatically mean an abundance of supply).

That said, given time, a shortage of supply will generally lead to rising prices. There needs to be a non-market based reason for prices to rise significantly absent a supply shortage.

The non-market based reasons (loose lending standards, massive speculation, etc.), often cross borders. State laws that restrict (or encourage) development do not cross borders.

From my understanding of the supply relative to population in CA, the amount of supply explains a lot of how the market moves in the state.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 17:53:22

With the 4.4 million excess empty houses in that state, I don’t think you have to worry about a short supply.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-03-11 18:02:22

Mania.

Our own manic prices half a mile over the border are half the manic prices of Canadian housing. It’s not like Canadians earn twice what Americans earn. They like debt more.

 
 
 
 
Comment by snake charmer
2014-03-11 08:08:41

This is common sense, but it is almost anathema to mention in socially and politically-broken Western cultures where rising housing prices officially are a good thing, period.

It’s been really unfortunate to see both Canada and Australia overtaken by greed and mania and poor leadership.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-03-11 08:14:05

It’s been really unfortunate to see both Canada and Australia overtaken by greed and mania and poor leadership.

It’s pretty much everywhere. Around the globe people have been brainwashed into believing that housing is supposed to be utterly unaffordable. It’s happened in Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Oceania and it’s even happening in the most impoverished continent of them all: Africa.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-03-11 11:54:58

Hello snake charmer:

I don’t think there is a western culture, but if there is, then it’s not broken. I think you may be referring to the cultures of white people. Don’t you think it’s weird that we are the minority on Earth, yet we are the ones who very visibly control the world? If that’s a broken culture, then what is a fixed culture?

All cultures have room for improvement, but attacking “the west” is really just bigoted, small minded, and jealousy-based.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-03-11 08:11:58

Nice post Ben….

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 06:54:34

Yorba Linda, CA Housing Prices Falling Apart On Skyrocketing Inventory; Prices Dive 14% YoY

http://www.movoto.com/yorba-linda-ca/market-trends/

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 06:58:35

‘Real estate is making British Columbian families richer, according to Statistics Canada’s latest report on financial security, though that is not necessarily making them better off.’

‘British Columbia saw the median family net worth, which measures total assets minus total debts, rise 128 per cent between 1999 and 2012 to $344,000 from $150,700 13 years previously — the highest among provinces in Canada compared with the national average of 78 per cent to $243,800 from $137,000 over the same time period.’

“From a financial planning perspective, that (gain) is irrelevant,” said Ian Black, a registered financial planner and principal with Vancouver firm Macdonald Shymko & Co., “unless you’re looking to get out of the market and (move) to another jurisdiction to release some of that equity.”

‘Black said the difficulty, particularly in the Lower Mainland, is that even if homeowners sell to downsize, they will still be looking to buy in an already expensive market. “You’ve got to live somewhere,” he added, and “that (increase in property value) isn’t going to generate any higher income.”

‘Those family units have also accumulated more debt: a total of $1.34 trillion in 2012, up from $864.6 billion in 2005. Most of the debt — about $1 trillion — has been used to finance home purchases. All figures are in inflation-adjusted dollars.’

‘However, the high prices are also a potential problem, according to economist Andrew Jackson of the Broadbent Institute, because prices are widely projected to moderate or even fall in the next few years. “The big question is if and when we get a housing price correction, individuals will still be holding the debt and that is a cause for concern,” he said.’

‘High prices are also a concern in B.C., particularly the Lower Mainland, because the rising value of real estate assets can come at the expense of other savings, said James Cripps, a chartered financial analyst and certified financial planner with Vancouver Financial Planning Consultants Inc.’

“What I’m seeing, actually, is more of people taking on mortgages so big they’ve finally figured out they won’t pay them off in their lifetime,” Cripps said.’

Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-03-11 11:58:27

Maybe you can’t pay the mortgage, but you can paint the walls, which makes a house into a home. Buy high and buy now!

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 07:22:51

“If you have to borrow for 15 or 30 years, you can’t afford it nor is it affordable.”

BINGO

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 07:24:19

‘Hints of the housing market’s undoing can be found in the questions being asked by a 26-year-old, recently graduated, money-saving virtuoso we’ll call Steve. He graduated with an engineering degree in 2012, landed a full-time job several months later and has been saving aggressively.’

‘He wonders, is it wise for a young person like himself to buy now, or is the market headed for a fall as baby boomers unload their family homes? “I’m curious who they think is going to buy their houses at the prices they expect to get,” Steve said.’

“I’m very fortunate in my situation,” he said. “But I feel like I’m a bit of an outlier. How many young people out there are swimming in debt and can’t even start saving up for a house down payment until their mid-30s?”

‘Boomers, wake up to this. A recent survey by Sun Life Financial suggests almost one in four Canadians see their house as their main source of income in retirement. Newsflash: Gen Y may not be able to pay the price you’re expecting to get for your home when you sell in the years to come.’

‘As for Steve, I suggest waiting on the home purchase. If it’s not Gen Y’s economic struggles that cool the market, it will be the total disconnect between rises in house prices and income.’

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 07:26:40

“A recent survey by Sun Life Financial suggests almost one in four Canadians see their house as their main source of income in retirement.”

The Managed Media Outlets continue to put this false notion out there.

Has anyone ever explained it?

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 07:56:35

‘Some homeowners in west Quebec are concerned that a Parti Québécois majority could create a glut in the housing market as non-Francophones are driven out of the province. There are also fears another referendum is around the corner as the separatist party leads in the polls in the run-up to the April 7 election.’

‘Sandro Santostefano said and his wife would not have bought a home in Aylmer three years ago if he knew there would be another referendum.’

“How many homes would be for sale at the same time? Would it be 2,000 or 3,000 homes for sale at the same time, which obviously dilutes the market, brings home values down, and of course worries me that I’ll be part of the thousands of homes that are for sale. Will it kill my investment?” he said.’

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 08:09:40

His “investment” was already dead and stinking the day he bought it.

I wonder if he realizes he holding onto a melting ice cube?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-03-11 08:10:21

I cannot remember a time when this wasn’t being floated. Quebec is Canada’s welfare province. They will whine for some benefit or another and then stop threatening to secede for another little while, I expect.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by snake charmer
2014-03-11 08:13:22

Canada is going to break up someday and yes, that will affect your investment Mr. Santostefano.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-03-11 12:05:33

Why do you think that Canada is going to break up? Do you think this will happen within Mr. Santostefano’s lifetime?

 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-03-11 08:38:36

When they’ve spent all their money on the mortgage, it kind of forces that to be true.

 
 
Comment by Puggs
2014-03-11 09:05:59

A HOUSE IS NOT AN INVESTMENT. Change your mindset and save yourself.

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-03-11 09:51:57

During the big bubble, all the Boomers were counting on Gen X to buy their houses. All the buying X-ers ended up bankrupt. Now the Boomers are counting on Gen Y to pick up the slack during the dead-cat bounce. Jimminy, how many generations of younger people will be whipped to death by the Baby Boomers?

First they offshore the jobs, then they borrow three generations worth of money to finance their lavish/early retirements, then they cause the cost of a college education to become a forever-burden, then they force young people to buy extrodinarily overpriced health insurance, so as to subsidize the Boomers. Will they stop at nothing? In another 15 years, there will be a law requiring toddlers to pay for burial plots.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
Comment by Puggs
2014-03-11 08:40:25

Central East City is REALLY tanking. Depression is what you get when you realize that you were taken buying in 2012-13. Oy!

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 07:37:01

‘It’s such an emotional thing. When you see it, you get it. I remember the days when there were lineups of people behind each other. The minute you see that your heart starts to race and you want to not lose’

And she’s a “mortgage expert” for a bank? Golly, I wonder if some of these people might be paying too much?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 07:58:34

Real Estate Agent Swindled $20 Million Up For Sentencing

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20140310/articles/140319964

 
Comment by "Uncle Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-03-11 09:42:56

For some reason, I feel sorry for Canadians with their oddly rolling socialist housing bubble. I totally don’t feel sorry for Americans though. I wonder why.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-03-11 10:12:32

Because our bubble was born in a log cabin and pulled itself up by its bootstraps?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-03-11 20:04:31

There is nothing “socialist” about huge household debt. It’s a mania. Just like every place else.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 22:18:49

Is there anything socialist about fractional reserve banking?

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 10:19:55

Trouble in landlord paradise? Volume is sorta high too:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=amh

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-03-11 11:27:49

Now there’s an equity I wouldn’t touch, ever.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2014-03-11 12:41:24

Went public less than a year ago…have any lockups come off recently?

 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2014-03-11 11:16:17

I know condo hotels is the indicator of the peak ,but how about “cash for house today !”

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 15:49:35

It’s hittin’ the fan in China.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 16:46:15

‘Shanghai-based Chaori Solar Energy Science & Technology Co on Friday confirmed the landmark default on interest payments of 89.8mn yuan ($14.7mn) for a five-year bond issued in 2012.’

‘The bond’s lead underwriter and trustee China Securities had asked Chaori to provide immovable assets, equipment and accounts receivable to be sold or auctioned, the solar cell maker said in a filing to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, where the bonds and its shares are listed.’

‘One investor said yesterday he did not have confidence in China Securities handling the issue, saying the firm had originally assured investors of Chaori’s ability to pay. “China Securities is the one that deceived us, it can’t be trusted,” investor Wang Yong told AFP. “We demand that China Securities repay us first and it can take the collateral from Chaori.”

http://www.gulf-times.com/eco.-bus.%20news/256/details/384217/chaori-to-sell-assets-to-make-payments

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 16:49:57

‘Iron ore prices tumbled nearly 9% to $104.70 a ton on Monday. The commodity slumped after the release of disappointing Chinese trade data over the weekend. China’s exports dropped 18.1% in February, and as a result China’s trade balance swung into a deficit. The weak trade data comes on the back of some disappointing manufacturing data, highlighting the fact that the Chinese economy is seeing a slowdown.’

‘China is the world’s top consumer of iron ore, and any weakness in the world’s second-largest economy has a negative impact on prices. Apart from the weak Chinese economic data, another reason for the drop in iron ore prices is concern over trade financing deals under which Chinese steel mills use iron ore as collateral to secure loans.’

‘As I noted in a previous article, China’s credit squeeze has forced financially stretched steel mills to secure loans using iron ore as collateral. This explains the significant increase in iron ore stockpiles at Chinese ports. As per data from Steelhome, iron ore stockpiles rose to a record of 105 million tons on Friday. Last week, a Chinese solar equipment maker defaulted on its debt. Following the default, rumors surfaced that a steel mill in China’s Shanxi province shut 5 to 6 furnaces. The rumors have sparked concerns that some of the trade financing deals that used iron ore as collateral could turn sour.’

‘Iron ore prices have already fallen more than 20% this year, entering into a bear market. The sharp decline means that some high-cost mines in China could be shut down. Given that iron ore supplies are set to increase this year, this could create a glut, further hurting prices.’

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/03/11/a-bear-market-for-iron-ore-is-bad-news-for-these-m.aspx

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-03-11 18:59:37

I just came across this from Australia:

‘Two of the major victims of the GFC, the quasi-private, government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage providers, are to be quietly dismantled under new proposed legislation and replaced with a scaled-back government mortgage guarantee and greater financial responsibility for private sector mortgage providers…Suffice to say shares in both took a tumble last night.’

‘Investors appeared to react to news first reported by Politico of a bi-partisan deal on Capitol Hill to phase-out the nation’s top two mortgage lenders. Shares of Fannie dropped 30% and Freddie shed 26% at day’s end.’

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post