April 4, 2014

Bits Bucket for April 4, 2014

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

167 Comments »

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 02:41:09

realtors are liars

Comment by Jingle Male
2014-04-04 05:20:03

Rent a home or buy? Depends where you live - CNBC

An analysis of home prices and rents by RealtyTrac found that in more than 90 percent of the counties it looked at, the average rent is higher than the cost of buying a median-priced home.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101552634?__source=yahoo%7Cfinance%7Cheadline%7Cheadline%7Cstory&par=yahoo&doc=101552634%7CRent%20a%20home%20or%20buy?%20Depen

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 06:57:24

J._Fraud,

You failed to mention the the article excludes all buy side expenses except for principal and interest and requires 20% down payment and those losses are excluded too. I do like the comment section though…..

Besides…. what does the article have to do with the fact that realtors are liars?

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-04-04 07:02:57

Then there are people who for some reason figure becoming a debt slave is the main priority and move away from great paying jobs and climate so that they could become debt slaves (paying rent to bankers and government).

It is far cheaper to rent than to own where 1) the climate is a great Mediterranean climate and 2) the salaries are high. In fact, I pay double rent compared to most other renters in my part of OC (my choice) and my monthly is still way less than the costs of the surrounding houses.

Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 07:22:53

I’m curious why you equate buying = enslavement? Are you not beholden to your landlord albeit just for the term of the lease? Yes you are locked in much longer with buying, but think it’s a reach to paint with such a broad brush.

In your situation it sounds like renting works for you - in others buying may be best. In yet other places it may be an equal proposition.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:25:31

realtor branDan,

Why would buying be best when buying doubles your monthly costs at current asking prices of resale housing?

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 07:32:31

You haven’t been reading the HBB for very long now, have you?

Bill is like the rock star of renting here, he is richer than the vast majority of posters here, and he earned all of it, he’s no trust fund baby.

Listen and learn.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:38:58

Indeed Bill is the model. And he lives rent free in the skulls of many who just can’t get over the fact that he’s self-made by renting in the choicest locations for a mere fraction of the cost of buying.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 07:40:47

I used to frequent this blog way back in 2006 - so I’m not new. I’ve been renting since 1999 so I’m not stranger to renting either. I’m merely point out that he’s painting with a broad brush. His situation works for him and where he lives but may not work for others and where they live.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:43:36

Sales activity collapsed so you’re back to trolling realtor tripe because you’ve got no other means. Got it.

How much you on the hook for?

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 08:24:28

Was in Boise on biz yesterday. I’ve been going over there since ‘98. I really like Boise but it’s become Vegas-lite. On every flight in since ‘98 I swear I’ve spotted another development going in. Lots of high-desert farm land there that’s plenty habitable/buildable. The Boise-Nampa corridor amazingly has, what, 4 lanes in each direction?

So, the warnings on buying there are fairly well founded. If you’re going to do it, I’d low-ball the heck out of any offer. That developers are asking mid-300s+ on new stock is outrageous. There are only so many Californians to absorb that stuff.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 08:33:49

H A - I’m not in real estate and I rent. I see that you subscribe to to the Saul Alinsky school of attacking the opposition rather than engaging in debate. IMO not very “analyst” on your part.

You are correct that sales in my location of Ada Count are down 9.83% Feb 14 vs Feb 13 but median sales price increased 10.98%. I’m hoping the market is pivoting lower since sales dropped.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 08:36:52

Of course you’re not.

Back to the fundamentals. Renting is half the cost of buying at inflated asking prices of resale housing. Now go fix your shelter problem.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 08:43:01

sleepless_near_seattle,

You are 100% correct about the the land out west and prices at the lower end reflect the abundance. Far western Ada count and Canyon county have abundant land to develop and prices on the lower end reflect it. BUT the actual city of Boise is mostly landlocked by city protected reserves and BLM/state land. There is a lot of development going on in East Boise not far from me but it’s all at a price point of $300k + . I am curious about the south end of town (SE of Micron). The city added a new sewer plant and there are two new developments priced at $200k and up (still above my price range) but nothing else.

 
Comment by Ethan in Norfolk vA
2014-04-04 08:55:19

The area I’m moving to, rents aren’t that far off of purchase?

Here in Norfolk you can rent cheaper than buying, but you will often get lower quality.

One thing I notice in the apartment is the air conditioner is a power killer (it’s old. When the old one died, instead of a new one they just moved another old one in. It’s a larger building, chilled water loop style heatpump.)

Also appliances aren’t efficient either. And you get bottom of the rung.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 08:56:06

What are prices like in Garden City and places north of there along the western edge of North End (but not in North End)?

There seems to be a lot of beat up stock in there. With a family that might be difficult to pull off but that’s my speed.

Or is that area infested with meth-heads?

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 09:18:30

sleepless_near_seattle,

I not as familiar with the area - a 25-30 minutes away from me and my kids’ school. But Garden City is still a mixed bag but slowly going through gentrification. NW Boise is the same - hit or miss with most asking over $150k.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-04-04 09:19:26

Bill is like the rock star of renting here, he is richer than the vast majority of posters here, and he earned all of it, he’s no trust fund baby.

I think that he once mentioned inheriting some money from an uncle or something.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-04-04 09:34:25

You have to ask yourself if there is such a thing as a housing bubble. It effects the math out beyond the next lease. 2008 is too long ago for some to remember, but it was just a foreshock. Unless there never was and never is a housing bubble.

If you think that in a flat market buying (mortgaged) is cheaper than renting, we need not discuss math.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 09:43:29

There is a lot of development going on in East Boise not far from me but it’s all at a price point of $300k + .

I think you covered this the other day, but those areas (like Nampa) being new are a “victim” of the square footage bubble. It boggles that anyone would pay $300+ out there.

 
Comment by Amy Hoax
2014-04-04 09:51:06

Brandon, just ignore them. The same few people post these ignorant blanket statements day after day.

Good luck with the house hunting!

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 10:00:50

This is typical of what they’re building in East Boise: http://www.buildidaho.com/idaho_subdivisions/ada_county/boise-_northeast/the_mill_district_at_harris_ranch/

And in far Southeast Boise: http://www.buildidaho.com/idaho_subdivisions/ada_county/boise-_southeast/painted_ridge/

A few of the places in Painted Ridge have been on the market for months.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 10:18:28

Why buy it when you can rent it for half the monthly cost?

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 10:23:04

Months, eh? Renew your lease. Wait a year. Then let the low-balling begin!

And by “low-balling” what I mean is offering a fair price on what is wildly overpriced list pricing, ie - 30-50% off current list prices.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 10:30:59

Amy,

I feel sorry for H A - his ctrl+V and crtl+P must be absolutely worn out. I’m keeping my eye out for rentals and resale.

Sleepless,

Landlord is not renewing my lease after nearly 4 years - I have to move by June. They are either selling or moving back in.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 10:35:36

Your charade is turning into a memorable schooling for you.

Realtors are liars.

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-04-04 10:58:09

It doesn’t matter where it is, it’s in a fu*king bubble.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 10:59:44

H A - you are quite hilarious with your conspiracy theories. While I’m sure you’re a valuable contributing member of society, I can’t help but imagine you being hunkered down in your mom’s basement with a tinfoil hat.

If it makes you sleep better to believe I’m someone else then fine - more power to you.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2014-04-04 14:08:39

I inherited 58k from my uncle and 30k from my dad in 2001. Lost 26k in stocks that year. I did not get wealthy from inheritance

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 14:12:49

You’ve got a shelter problem. What are you going to do to solve it?

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 14:52:02

H A - two simple choices as a solution: rent or buy.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 16:18:57

There… you’ve stepped back into reality.

Now the obvious choice is to rent considering rental rates are half the costs of a mortgage at current asking prices of resale housing.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 17:49:17

H A - please specifically illustrate how you arrive at your state? What variables are you taking into account? I’m not going to let you proclaim such bold statements without any data or explanation.

For example the current home I rent (3/2 1100 sq ft.) would probably sell for $150k and I rent for $850 per month - the rent is quite fair and would stay if the landlord was willing to renew the lease. At what price would would this house be fair to buy? Keep in mind that the house when built in ‘94 probably sold new for $80-85k. During the bubble comps went for about $200k (neighbor bought at $197k) and bottomed 3 years ago at about $120k.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 17:52:52

Then post a link of it.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 18:06:37

While not my own home, this is quite typical of the type of home on the market in the area I’m interested in: http://www.trulia.com/property/3149385942-4160-E-Carnation-Ct-Boise-ID-83716

IMO it is overpriced. The house next door is a rental for $975 a mo and rented in under a week.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 18:35:17

What good is that? That house nor the house that supposedly went for rent is for sale.

 
Comment by Brandon Boise
2014-04-04 20:11:59

H A, the house posted is for sale…what are you not seeing? The house next door (of course) is not for sale because it’s a rental. The two houses are what you would call comps for asking and rental prices.

I’m done attempting to engage you in a dialogue - I’ll free up your time for blogging the same canned responses from your mother’s basement.

 
 
 
Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 07:23:44

Thanks pimp. Keep drinking that Kool aid.

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-04-04 10:08:48

You’re linking to CNBC? HAHAHA! It’s nothing but a shill site.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 06:58:13

Don’t you wish you could have been at this party?

“The people who sold most of the residential real estate in metro Denver in 2013 met at the Infinity Park Event Center Thursday to recognize the best among them at the Denver Metro Association of Realtors’ 36th Roundtable of Excellence Awards.”

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/blog/real_deals/2014/04/denver-metro-association-of-realtors-namebest-of.html

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:21:50

What a conglomeration of criminals boasting of their exploits.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:11:26

Time to apply the RICO Act.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-04-04 10:26:13

Sounds about as enjoyable as a rectal exam.

Comment by albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 14:15:28

Lola would find that enjoyable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-04-04 04:43:09

“so No. 1 was concern for the children and concern for the environment,” Dillard said.”

11-year-old building tree fort says officer pulled gun on him, friends

By Aaron Diamant
Posted: 7:26 p.m. Tuesday, April 1, 2014

HENRY COUNTY, Ga. —
A fifth-grader says he was terrified when a police officer pointed a gun at him and his friends while they built a tree fort.

Omari Grant, 11, said he and his friends often play in a wooded area behind his home and were building a fort when a neighbor in the next subdivision called police to complain about what the boys were doing.

But no one anticipated what Omari and his mother say happened next.

Omari told Diamant that two officers, one with his gun drawn, rolled up on him and a few of his friends as they built a fort in the trees behind his home.

“I was thinking that I don’t want to be shot today, so I just listened to what they said,” Omari said.

Omari said the officer holding his gun also used foul language and made him and his friends lay down on the ground.

Diamant ran what Omari told him past Edgar Dillard, whose wife, according to 911 records, called in from the next subdivision to complain the boys were “chopping off tree limbs.”

And the reason for his wife’s call: “There were falling hazards, tripping hazards, all types of hazards, so No. 1 was concern for the children and concern for the environment,” Dillard said.

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/11-year-old-building-tree-fort-says-officer-pulled/nfQKK/ - 92k -

Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 06:44:26

Look, I know there are plenty of jackass cops and I’m not a fan of the militarized police culture which is usually just boondoggle toys for boys anyways. But these articles you post are no different than the ones about the property bubble that are so ridiculous. Instead of a Stealtor or banker saying some outrageous lie and expecting it to be taken at face value, you always have some lowlife or person suing someone else and they give some ridiculous story and the “reporter” takes it at face value without doing any probing.

This is not what really happened.

Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-04-04 07:06:51

“This is not what really happened.”

Huh? Prove it.

Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 07:33:12

Wake up. Here: “Omari now admits he and his friends made a bad call cutting off those branches, but is still a little shaken up about how he learned that lesson.”

He and his friends cutting off those branches? Chopping off tree limbs? What does that mean, how? Oh, maybe with cutting tools like axes or machetes?

So two cops, only one with gun drawn, have to roll up on a pack of kids with axes or machetes? And of course nothing from the other side because they are prevented by their own lawyers and rules from saying anything to the media at this point in the investigation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:13:30

Don’t be a badge licker.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-04-04 16:21:12

“like axes or machetes?”

Maybe they were gonna blow some stumps with dynamite!

As her whipped husband explained, some old green biddy didn’t like the kids cutting tree limbs so she called 911 out of concern for the environment. The I have to make it home alive tonight cop showed up gun drawn and put the dangerous fort building 11 year olds on the ground.

As far as the ridiculous articles I post about the militarized police, I was happy this kid and his Mom could tell their side as apposed to the homeless dude who the militarized police shot with bean bags, sicked the K-9 officer on and then shot to death right before they cuffed him last week.

 
Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 19:53:23

Badge licker? I said I don’t like the jackasses and militarization, but you guys are victims of a liberal race baiting cop hating media that spins ambulance chaser dream stories.

Whenever you see one of these stories that doesn’t quite make sense, it’s cause they are leaving stuff out and spinning it. Cops encounter people by the millions every day. Sure you are going to have some problems. You are also going to have lots of criminals whining and lying. Wake up.

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2014-04-04 22:03:53

Nope. You are living back 30 years ago. These are the days of the authorities stomping on innicentd FBI in Idaho versus the Weavers. Waco, where women and children were torched. Jack boot Janet ordering paramilitary thugs in Florida to grab Eloan and return him to communist Cuba. It’s all there.

And Chris Dorner in L.A. was no saint but he had a lot of accurate things he said in his manifesto about LAPD. The same LAPD who gunned down two Hispanic women delivering newspapers mistaking them for a big black man.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 06:45:00

Roids and cops do not mix.

 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2014-04-04 04:48:21

At what point do we reach the minima/Laffer Curve-like inflection point of interest rates where lenders decide that inflation is ahead and loans made now will be paid back with cheaper dollars? If I was loaning money out and realized that soon I could get better rates in a risk-free government bond pool, I’d probably not want to loan out as much.

I guess keeping an eye on the bond market is the real deal. Hard to imagine interest rates can be gamed for very long…….

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 05:15:09

What inflation?

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-04-04 05:01:07

Everyone Must Check In

Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 05:56:05

“Chiggity check yo self before you wreck yo self” — Ice Cube

Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 06:39:25

Cause tricks like Lola is bad of yo health.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-04-04 16:39:17

That wasn’t on the card.

My name is…

 
 
 
Comment by Blackhawk
2014-04-04 05:41:48

Cheap Shale Gas Leading to Chemicals Renaissance

Lower energy input costs and higher profitability have suddenly made the United States the investment center for the worldwide petrochemicals industry. Plans for nearly 150 factory and plant expansions across the country are on the drawing board, totaling $129 billion… all as a result of cheap shale gas.

Companies Investing in U.S. Chemicals

From an investment standpoint, there are a number of companies taking the plunge and making multi-billion-dollar investments in new or upgraded petrochemical facilities:

- Dow Chemical (DOW) is spending $4 billion to expand its U.S. chemicals production. This investment includes a new plant in Freeport, Texas that will make ethylene.

- Royal Dutch Shell ADR (RDS.A)is moving ahead with plans to build a multi-billion-dollar, world-class ethane cracker facility here in my native western Pennsylvania.

- Other companies expanding their efforts in petrochemicals include the likes of

ExxonMobil (XOM), LyondellBasell Industries NV

(LYB), Sasol (SSL), Methanex (MEOH) and CPChem, a joint venture of

Chevron (CVX) and Phillips 66 (PSX).

Just another example how the oilfield industry boom is generating business activities in related industries, having an exponential effect on the economies “where these activities are allowed”.

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2014-04-04 05:59:51

Yeah, and have you ever seen magnesium burn? It goes up brilliantly in an intense flame and poof, it is over.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-04-04 06:29:21

Having worked for one of the giants in that business I can say first hand that they extrapolate short term trends to the moon. The plants will be built for 50 years of service, based on gas prices that can turn on a dime (relatively).

We’ll make money on it (the new plants).

Comment by Blackhawk
2014-04-04 07:33:35

So you think the natural gas boom is a short term trend? Hmm, I’m thinking it’s going to fuel the recovery of our economy and provide jobs for the masses in the future.

Have you ever been through a cracking plant, where they take natural gas and separate out all the –thanes? It’s an amazing process.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:35:33

^lol.

You’re talking to a guy that designs and build frac towers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 07:47:21

So you think the natural gas boom is a short term trend? Hmm, I’m thinking it’s going to fuel the recovery of our economy and provide jobs for the masses in the future.

Yes, we have a 50 to 100 year supply but we should not export it, we should use it here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-04-04 10:42:48

I’m in favor of the nationalization of all natural resources in the US and creating a sovereign wealth fund.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 06:21:46

I was thinking both about the discussion yesterday about Russia and Goon’s permanent democratic majority posts. If you live long enough you see just how far things can deviate from expected paths. My question for the day is: on what side is God on in the dispute between Russia and America? It is actually a trick question because the answer I want some people to say is there is no God. That would have been the correct response in the Soviet Union in 1964. In America, people, in 1964, could not even conceive of a time when the Russian leader would attend church far more than the American president. The first cold war was won by the Christian nation and I expect the second one will be as well. However, Russia is trending to becoming a Christian nation again and we are trending away. So I end this post as I started it not knowing if those trends will continue but fascinated on how different things can be than the expected outcome fifty years ago.

Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 07:03:06

You think Sky Wizard really gives a sh*t about the Russia vs. USA humanoids?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 07:21:23

My main point Goon is that trends often times make lousy predictors of the future. I am amazed that Pat Buchanan and I both ask the same question the same day even if I asked it more as a trick question and he asked it in a much more serious manner.

 
 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-04-04 07:10:41

You know my point of view. I’m an atheist and certainly an anti-communist. I couldn’t care less about the question of “God” and where she belongs (Russia or USA).

Red wine is better for you than imagination of a belligerant megalomaniac entity.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 07:24:09

I agree with you that red wine is good for you but not the rest of the sentence. P.S. my girlfriend is a militant agnostic as the bumper sticker goes; “I don’t know and neither do you” or something like that.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 07:52:08

“Red wine is better for you than imagination of a belligerent megalomaniac entity.”

LMAO. I agree.

Might I also add that red wine is better for you than belligerently insisting there is no megalomaniac entity.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:09:18

BTW Bill watching gold today?

Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2014-04-04 18:01:55

Yes it was up slightly but I am starting to notice the nice thing about leverage of a higher and higher stack: The slight uptick increased my physical holding value by more than $1,000.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-04-04 09:27:29

Red wine is better for you than imagination of a belligerant megalomaniac entity.

So when it comes to churches, does that make the fundamentalists who use grape juice instead of communion wine the worst of all of them?

 
 
Comment by The Zima Guy
2014-04-04 08:21:31

God is Russian. I have seen him chugging vodka too many times.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:28:17

You have confirmed many a Russian’s belief.

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-04-04 09:32:41

Some interesting statistics, if you could find them, would be the portion of Russians who call themselves Christians and the portion who go to church on regular basis and then compare them to the US numbers.

Also, I remember reading a few years ago that Putin gave the Russian Orthodox church an officially privileged position compared to other Christian churches. Then he did the same thing for certain varieties of the Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist religions. That’s definitely different form the American approach.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 09:59:15

Mike, I agree sounds like an interesting research project.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 10:10:19

this is interesting but does not capture trends of the last few years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Russia

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2014-04-04 18:25:03

The average person isn’t gracious and thankful to just to be alive; they expect an afterlife too. Greedy.

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-04-04 19:57:21

Greedy.

+1 It’s funny because it’s true.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 06:26:18

Right after I created my post, I found this link on Drudge.

http://www.creators.com/opinion/pat-buchanan.html

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 06:31:31

‘if i had a son, he’d look like trayvon’ — president barack obama

drudge link:

‘as a 54-year old roseville man clings to life in the hospital following a brutal mob beating on detroit’s east side, many are starting to wonder if the whole thing was racially motivated.

as first reported by wwj newsradio 950, an 11-year-old boy suffered a broken leg on wednesday when he was hit by a pickup truck after walking into the street near morang and balfour. the driver, steven utash, immediately got out of his truck after hitting the boy and was viciously attacked by 10 to 12 men. the beating was so brutal, utash was rendered unconscious.

police declined to say if investigators thought the attack was racially charged.’

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2014/04/04/white-man-beaten-by-mob-in-detroit-after-hitting-boy-with-truck-was-it-a-hate-crime/

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 06:39:35

Another Drudge link:

“White House officials sought valuable primetime air for a rare, impromptu Tuesday night address to tout the accomplishment of signing up more than 7 million people under the Affordable Care Act.

But network officials refused to make the kind of accomodation they did previously for the announcement that Osama Bin Laden had been killed, for instance, and Obama was left instead cutting into the much smaller audiences of Ellen and other daytime shows.

Three sources familiar with the request confirmed the White House asked for the primetime slot in their effort both to emphasize a bright moment following the challenging roll out and, more important, to try to reintroduce the country to a law that remains unpopular.”

http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/the-white-house-tried-to-get-network-primetime-on?s=mobile

If you like your primetime TV, you can keep your primetime TV

LOLZ

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:12:59

But NFL on Primetime is great…. with 4 TV dinners.

Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 07:37:39

The obvious choices: One Salisbury steak. One Mexican enchiladas. One fried chicken. One more…, what am I missing?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 07:40:45

Pizza of course.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by LolaLOL
2014-04-04 19:54:56

Pizza TV dinner? Hmm I need to investigate.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 19:58:06

And don’t forget the Swanson Turkey TV dinner edition during thanksgiving. Half a dozen of those in front of TV watching football is heavenly.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 07:41:28

I would make the fried chicken, chicken wings and add some Chinese, maybe sweet and sour pork.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2014-04-04 09:01:03

If you have wimmynfolk with you, one must be a Lean Cuisine Spa Selection. Favorites are salmon with rice and butternut squash ravioli.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 09:25:16

If that is wild rice, it sounds good but that might be considered a metrosexual comment.

 
 
 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 07:54:10

Perhaps the networks are concerned that Obama is bad for ratings.

 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 07:11:57

Because we are better than you :)

“Boulder residents have the lowest obesity rates in the country for the fourth year in a row, according to a Gallup and Healthways poll released Friday.

With an obesity rate of just 12.4 percent, Boulder residents are well below the national average, where more than one-third of U.S. adults are overweight, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Two other Colorado communities also grace the top 10 for lowest obesity rates: Fort Collins-Loveland — 18.2 percent, and Denver-Aurora — 19.3 percent.

Boulder has claimed the No. 1 spot every year Gallup has conducted the survey, with the exception of 2009, when Fort Collins-Loveland nabbed first place.”

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/morning_call/2014/04/boulder-colorado-residents-no-1-for-skinniest-in.html

Comment by jose canusi
2014-04-04 07:31:21

Colorado is the new California.

Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 07:47:57

Wow - jose! Talk about being on a similar wavelength…

There’s much preoccupation on this board about diet and looks - among the men, no less. Metrosexuals abound.

Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 07:58:41

“Investing” in your health is one of the greatest investments you can make.

I’ve watched a few people die in their 50s and 60s from preventable lifestyle choices, and it doesn’t look fun.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:10:22

That’s not what your post was about.

It’s about comparing yourself with others to support a fragile ego. Are you balding?

 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-04-04 08:11:03

I know we all have to die someday, but I always thought in my case, an exception would be made.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:26:38

If someone finds fat people offensive, that’s his or her problem. Fat people don’t exist to please others, much like bald people don’t exist to please others.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:42:38

If someone finds fat people offensive, that’s his or her problem. Fat people don’t exist to please others, much like bald people don’t exist to please others.

There are differences. Obesity is a health issue, baldness isn’t. Obesity has an impact on the health care system and insurance rates, baldness does not.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 08:42:52

“that’s his or her problem”

Since I’m paying thousands of dollars annually for health insurance I never use to subsidize the bad lifestyle choices of others, you’re correct that it is my problem.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:50:47

Obesity is a health issue, baldness isn’t.

Sun burned heads lead to an increase in skin cancer. :) So government can now regulate hair under Obamacare.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:58:55

“Since I’m paying thousands of dollars annually for health insurance I never use to subsidize the bad lifestyle choices of others, you’re correct that it is my problem.”

LMFAO!

So the poster who repeatedly drums support for Single Payer healthcare is all upset that he has to pay for some fat person’s healthcare.

Sad panda boo hoo.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 09:31:12

all upset that he has to pay for some fat person’s healthcare.

Single payer doesn’t (shouldn’t) connote a lack of responsibility.

Likewise, don’t argue for fatties being able to eat/do whatever they want and then complain about your medical insurance rates increasing.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 09:43:57

“LMFAO”

Keep laughing, Bethieboy.

Because that health care being 18% of USA GDP isn’t rugged individualist and American exceptionalist enough, lifestyle choices will push that amount north of 25% someday soon, hopefully that will tickle your funny bone as much as this joke of a thread has.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 10:09:06

Yes, sleepless, single payer will encourage “fatty” to do more of the same. And your costs will go up.

“Fatty” will tend to become less fat if “fatty” has to pay for his or her own insurance out of pocket. Same thing with “smoker Sally” and “Veggie Virginia”. All will become more healthy if they get to pay full freight.

As Fatty and Veggie Virginia pay more for being irresponsible, my costs go down.

But, hey, more power to you for voting for Big Government. You get more Fatty and less service. A win-win if there ever was one

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 10:27:01

“Fatty” will tend to become less fat if “fatty” has to pay for his or her own insurance out of pocket.

That “should” be true, but isn’t. They’ll just not get insurance, therefore, your rates will go even higher.

“It’s a vicious cycle.”
-Fat Bastard

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-04-04 11:25:35

“Fatty” will tend to become less fat if “fatty” has to pay for his or her own insurance out of pocket. Same thing with “smoker Sally” and “Veggie Virginia”. All will become more healthy if they get to pay full freight.

As Fatty and Veggie Virginia pay more for being irresponsible, my costs go down.

But, hey, more power to you for voting for Big Government. You get more Fatty and less service. A win-win if there ever was one

Probably nearly everyone in America who has insurance at this point, whether it’s through their employer or Medicare, has to pay significant co-payments and deductibles. These costs have been rising rapidly for decades. Obesity has not fallen in response to that. The opposite has happened.

Also, in every developed country on the planet the government plays a much larger role in health care and private, for-profit insurance companies play a much smaller role. Those countries all pay much less for health care.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 08:14:44

Its that diet time of year Mac. Just think….. Only 5 months from now I’ll be back on the couch consuming groceries all weekend.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 08:48:54

Real eaters don’t need concussionball on the teevee as justification to consume groceries.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:50:54

There’s much preoccupation on this board about diet and looks - among the men, no less. Metrosexuals abound.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a manpurse all the years I’ve lived here. I think the typical Coloradan is more interested in this year’s new hiking boots or mountain bikes than in getting a manicure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 09:03:16

The $500 Arc’Teryx jacket that has never been touched by a snowflake or speck of mud = the Colorado manpurse.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-04-04 09:39:55

Arc’Teryx - even the name sounds yuppie

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 10:21:03

The $500 Arc’Teryx jacket that has never been touched by a snowflake or speck of mud = the Colorado manpurse.

LOL! Hard to argue with that.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 13:24:16

the Colorado manpurse

Ditto the Oregon/Washington manpurse. Street cred in these parts is all about the “outdoorsy,” which seems like an oxymoron.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:23:03

Colorado is the new California.

Hardly. Muni employees rarely get db pensions. We have some of the lowest taxes in the country. We have TABOR. I’ve lived in California. The two are hardly the same.

I fail to see how having low obesity rates makes us “California”. Loveland is a redneck town, if anything, and it has a low obesity rate.

Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 08:26:51

Haters gonna hate. And to quote Bob Dylan:

“Don’t criticize what you can’t understand”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:29:48

Colorado has the guns but California has the numbers.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:31:08

They are going to move there and take over.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:33:42

They are going to move there and take over.

The typical transplant here is from the midwest, not the west coast. Californians are afraid of the snow.

 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:31:36

There’s plenty of rednecks in California, In Colorado.

Ever been to Susanville or Eureka? Egad.

What I don’t understand is what TABOR has to do with an obsessive need to compare people based on appearance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:46:04

Just pointing out that Colorado is not a California clone.

And obesity is not an “appearance” issue. How you dress or wear your hair is an appearance issue. Obesity is a health issue.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:52:01

“And obesity is not an “appearance” issue.”

Sure it is.

Need proof? Examine yesterday’s threads for starters.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:54:15

There’s plenty of rednecks in California, In Colorado.

Ever been to Susanville or Eureka? Egad.

Yes, but you have to realize that Loveland/Ft. Collins isn’t some remote podunk town. We have plenty of tech firms here.

I think you’d have to live here to get it.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 09:13:35

I already get it.

One thing you want to do if you want to keep Colorado and not lose Colorado to California is to eliminate vanity as it appears.

Do you want Colorado to be known for being vain? People elsewhere are starting to paint it as such, you know.

It’s not only fellow Coloradoans who roll their eyes at the People’s Republic of Boulder, for instance.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 10:31:09

Do you want Colorado to be known for being vain?

If the rest of the country is going to perceive us as “vain” because we aren’t landwhales, that’s their problem. We are what we are. If pudgy southerners think we’re vain, there’s nothing we can do about that. And to be honest, I don’t anyone here is concerned about what kind of image we project. We wouldn’t have legalized MJ if we were worried about image. If anything, worrying about image is vain.

 
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2014-04-04 08:41:20

If people restricted their carb intake (increases healthy longevity) , ate low pesticide produce,moved a little everyday, and would shed excess weight as it showed up, the obesity epidemic would have a big dent. People eat too much cr*p.

If the weather doesn’t permit outside activity, get a treadmill or equivalent.
It’s a learned behavior.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:47:45

The obesity “epidemic” is due to technology and personal devices more than lack of exercise.

Cut the former and most naturally will do more of the latter. Pretty simple.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 08:54:16

I want bikini pics (you can crop your face out to keep it anonymous).

Coo coo coo choo, Mrs. Robinson.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 11:20:30

The obesity “epidemic” is due to technology and personal devices more than lack of exercise.

Last time I checked people in Colorado had iPhones, TVs, PCs and iPads.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 13:31:07

If people restricted their carb intake

If by “carbs” you mean things like non whole wheat pastas/breads, yes. Veggies and fruits are great carbs that are needed for energy and provide other nutrients.

I went “low-carb” but didn’t back fill with more fruits/veggies and paid for it by always being tired.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2014-04-04 20:00:08

sleepless
I’m on the same page, but gotta tell you, fruit has a lot of sugar. I gain weight on even an apple (with cinnamon, no less). Avocado is my only fruit. I LOVE them!

The 99C Only store is a sugar orgasm for me. I stay out of it.

I use to be a vegan, and I became Pre-Diabetic, but reversed it by getting my $hit together.

 
 
 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 07:46:07

Californians also like to compare themselves to others in this very same manner. Quite vain.

I wonder…how many plastic surgeons are there per capita in Boulder, Fort Collins and Denver? Seems like a market ready ripe for the plucking, if that’s not being done so already.

Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 08:05:11

Not sure what people who stay in shape from exercising (which our 300 annual days of sunshine certainly encourages) has to do with plastic surgery.

This is the Front Range, not Aspen here.

Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:12:52

It means plenty if everyone there is as preoccupied with other people’s weight as you seem to be.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 08:32:33

Sizeists gonna size, Bethieboy.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:36:35

It means plenty if everyone there is as preoccupied with other people’s weight as you seem to be.

People out here don’t seem to obsess about that. They just enjoy the outdoors, which is much easier to do here than in places like the hot and humid South.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-04-04 08:38:52

Die of thirst or die of heatstroke…….. A distinction without a difference.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:42:24

Apparently so.

No wonder women often complain about the absence of real men.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 08:44:50

Thanks for the response, In Colorado. I hope you are correct. I wouldn’t be surprised if higher altitude discourages hunger pangs.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 08:55:56

I hope you are correct. I wouldn’t be surprised if higher altitude discourages hunger pangs

But pot causes hunger pains. Five years from now when Goon is as big as the Goodyear blimp, we will not hear a word from him and if we do he will blame it on AGW. :)

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 08:58:31

I wouldn’t be surprised if higher altitude discourages hunger pangs.

I really think it’s the lifestyle. People here really do seem to be more active. When my brother visited from North Carolina he said that the difference here is noticeable.

Also, heavy, fried food isn’t popular out here. There’s nothing here like Bojangle’s. I think there are two Krispie Kreme stores in the whole state.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 09:05:57

Don’t get me wrong - I think it’s great when people exercise and get in shape. “It feels great” is what should be promoted, not the “health issue” or the “looking good” angles.

I find the game of one-upmanship based on appearance and physical fitness to be laughable (are we still in high school?).

It’s downright hilarious when men act like some diva from a 1980s nighttime soap.

The divas on this board aren’t the women.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 09:19:47

I find the game of one-upmanship based on appearance and physical fitness to be laughable (are we still in high school?).

Sorry if came off like that but I do believe that getting good fats from foods like salmon and nuts are important. My father had a massive heart attack at 50 and had uncontrollable blood pressure when he was in his thirties.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-04-04 09:44:05

You didn’t Dan. I meant it as a general observation.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 09:45:49

are=is

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 10:32:46

“It feels great” is what should be promoted, not the “health issue”

Are you serious? People shouldn’t care about their health?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 10:36:37

No wonder women often complain about the absence of real men.

That is a whole different ball of wax, best discussed elsewhere.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-04-04 10:37:58

I find the game of one-upmanship based on appearance and physical fitness to be laughable (are we still in high school?).

Sounds like goonie hit a nerve.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 11:57:43

“hit a nerve”

Forget high school, let’s take it all the way back to 3rd grade.

You, Carl Morris, and myself stole MacBeth’s bookbag and we are running around him in a circle playing keepaway, and he’s too slow to catch any of us :)

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2014-04-04 13:40:10

People shouldn’t care about their health?

+1. I’d like to hear more about how that works.

I agree that “looking good” shouldn’t be a focus because it leads to diets/exercise that aren’t sustainable. If you focus on good health, the others follow. Has to be a lifestyle.

 
Comment by inchbyinch
2014-04-04 20:13:18

It’s both, let’s be honest. Firstly, I avoid the medical field as much as possible. Staying healthy through diet and exercise is a high priority.

Secondly, I like clothing and want to look like a well put together lady. Land Whales as friends, has taught me a lot. They look like slobs and can’t do things with me. NASA/JPL’s last open house was a disaster. Obesity slowed us down and we had to leave early.

Thirdly, I have an obese family, and my mother has had cancer 4 times. I refuse to go there, if at all possible.

Four, I have to see my naked body. I women should look like a lady until the end.

 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 09:16:39

LOLZ

 
 
Comment by inchbyinch
2014-04-04 07:50:24

OT, just for fun…Last night we watched George Carlin’s monologue on soft language and euphemisms. Carlin was a bright and insightful fellow. Truly, beyond a comedian.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuEQixrBKCc

WWI- Shell Shock
WWII -Battle Fatigue
Korean -War Operational Exhaustion
Vietnam War- Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Burying the pain …

Comment by The Zima Guy
2014-04-04 09:52:46

Chickens coming home to roots. The only sad part is they are killing their own. Know the enemy, people.

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2014-04-04 18:06:02

You should google up Carlin’s take on religion. I love what he wrote!

Comment by inchbyinch
2014-04-04 20:19:26

Bill
LOVE Carlin’s take on Religion. Right on!
And the 10 Commandments was great. Don’t forget his take on yuppie parents “obsessive diaper sniffers” LOL

Here’s the text on his Religion monologue.
http://rense.com/general69/obj.htm
I took it with me to a family dinner and caused high bp. LOL

 
 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2014-04-04 09:14:26

MF Global customers made “whole”

http://tinyurl.com/kocvodx

So……..MF Global steals their money to pay off gambling debts, but are considered “whole” when they eventually get their money back almost three years later…….essentially an involuntary three year, no interest loan.

And, since there was no crime committed, nobody goes to jail.

Another example of when you owe the bank enough money, you own the bank.

Such a deal. Too bad deals like this never seem to trickle down to the wretched refuse.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 09:31:42

So……..MF Global steals their money to pay off gambling debts, but are considered “whole” when they eventually get their money back almost three years later…….essentially an involuntary three year, no interest loan.

No disagreement with your analysis but because of the Fed most people that save money have been getting around 0% interest since 2008. The elderly must either risk their money or accept a return below inflation.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 10:20:01

RIO DE JANEIRO, April 4 (Reuters) - Brazilian state-run oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA suffered a setback in its effort to boost oil output last month when Italian contractor Saipem SpA dropped a 2.3 km steel pipe into the Atlantic Ocean. On March 16, rigging failed as it was being used to wrangle the pipe into position on a floating oil platform. The high-grade, metal-alloy tubes plunged about 1,800 meters (5,900 feet) to the seabed, a total, crumpled loss. The pipe itself was worth about $2 million, but the cost of the accident will be much higher, two sources with direct knowledge of the situation told Reuters. By setting back efforts to expand Roncador, Brazil’s No. 2 oilfield, by at least a month, Petrobras will lose tens of millions of dollars in oil output, salaries and equipment leases when it can least afford it. The accident was the latest in a series of setbacks as Petrobras has struggled to transform giant new offshore discoveries into increased output, despite a $221 billion five-year investment plan. “The series of management and engineering problems the company faces is flabbergasting,” said Cleveland Jones, a professor and researcher with Brazil’s National Petroleum and Gas Institute at the State University of Rio de Janeiro. “This may have been an unfortunate accident, but it comes as the company’s organizational problems are becoming more evident.” 1234 - See more at: http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/132418/Petrobras_Setbacks_Threaten_2014_Oil_Production_Targets#sthash.1wnOXq3D.dpuf

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
Comment by goon squad
2014-04-04 12:06:32

Legal MJ means less business for the cartels, and less violence on both sides of the border. If only American junkies would stop using meth, coke, heroin, demand would disappear and with it these problems.

What say, Dannyboy?

Comment by albuquerquedan
2014-04-04 14:24:30

Legal MJ means less business for the cartels, and less violence on both sides of the border.

I think that Colorado is a good experiment. Whether it means less money for the cartels will depend on whether the cartel competes with legal stores and undercuts them. Cigarettes are legal but organized crime makes a bundle by hauling cigarettes from low cigarette tax states to high cigarette states.

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-04-04 18:30:29

zlop • 2 hours ago

“The Trillion Dollar Heist” ?

Carbon disclosure project was $80 Trillion.
In addition to the $200 billion, trying to find CO2 warming,
another $100 billion is requested.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post