July 2, 2014

Bits Bucket for July 2, 2014

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

176 Comments »

Comment by azdude
2014-07-02 04:47:04

buy some more stock while its still cheap.

Comment by Combotechie
2014-07-02 05:38:28

Allow Wall Street to pay all your bills for you.

Comment by Combotechie
2014-07-02 05:43:54

Your house too, allow your house to pay all your bills for you.

It can be done, just ask this guy:

“If you paid your mortgage off, it means you probably did not manage your funds efficiently over the years,” said David Lereah, chief economist of the National Association of Realtors and author of “Are You Missing the Real Estate Boom?” “It’s as if you had 500,000 dollar bills stuffed in your mattress.”

He called it “very unsophisticated.” (Los Angeles Times Aug 28th, 2005)

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 05:49:26

May he soon join Jamie Dimon. Perhaps they can share a hospital room.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-07-02 06:47:01

That was mean spirited, IMO.

 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 07:00:42

Are you freakin’ kidding me? If people were more “mean-spirited” about these pigmen and liars, we wouldn’t be where we are now.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 07:04:29

You’re sick. Jamie Dimon has suffered enough already when he had his 52nd birthday dinner celebration interrupted by Bear Stearns imploding. The HBB should pool some money to send him flowers and oversized stuffed animals.

 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 07:09:32

I’m sick? Well, in for a penny, in for a pound. Here’s hoping Jamie Dimon gets the medical treatment equivalent of what he dealt to others.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 08:09:15

Here’s hoping Jamie Dimon gets the medical treatment equivalent of what he dealt to others.

I hope he gets treatment equivalent to Obamacare’s bronze plan.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 09:05:14

I hope he gets treatment equivalent to Obamacare’s bronze plan.

You mean an HD plan? Isn’t that what most people already had before Obamacare?

Bronze plans are worthless. When I tell my European relatives about how HD plans work, they’re aghast. They can’t believe how much we actually pay for those useless health plans.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 09:50:38

Bronze plans are worthless.

Yes. I think that the bronze plan is like the scene in Idiocracy where the person is being processed for medical care and he needs to put one “probe” in his mouth and one probe in his butt and the technician makes a mistake on which one is which. The butt probe is the bronze plan and Jamie does deserve that level of care since the bubble he helped create and the subsequent recession has caused millions to lose their employer based health insurance.

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-07-02 20:41:51

Why should people wish well for a man who ruined millions of lives? If Charles Manson got cancer, nobody would be wishing him well, yet Jamie Dimon gets cancer and people on blogs and market websites, etc., are wishing him well? He only, you know, contributed to the biggest economic meltdown in the history of the world, much of it by the way of FRAUD. F**k Jamie Dimon.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-07-02 22:11:30

I just can’t stop wondering about the origins of Michael Douglas’s throat cancer; could it also explain Jamie Dimon’s case?

 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2014-07-02 05:57:23

“He called it ‘very unsophisticated.’”

Sophisticated is where one draws out all his house’s equity and buys shares of company stock with the money, preferably a stock with the highest price/earnings ratio.

And it is probably true that those posters who regularly reply to their own posts are mentally unstable

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Salinasron
2014-07-02 06:06:32

Two years ago I had friends telling me their mortgage companies were continually asking them if they wanted a biweekly mortgage payment plan to help pay off their mortgage. This past month they are getting bombarded with ‘refinance and take out you equity so you can pay bills, vacation, buy a new car, etc’.
So this begs the question of when will bubble two pop? I’m sure that the slide will be faster than the first!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 06:29:13

And it is probably true that those posters who regularly reply to their own posts are mentally unstable

Stability is overrated.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 07:42:36

His definition of financial sophistication (for the retail participant) means funneling one’s wealth to Wall Street.

“C’mon, everyone’s doing it, don’t be such a square!”

It means something quite different for the FIRE infrastructure where sophistication means finding ways to receive that wealth.

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” — Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass

 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 09:01:03

So this begs the question of when will bubble two pop? I’m sure that the slide will be faster than the first!”

when the Youtube video of “how do you like your love” by Andrea true get posted again on this blog , sure sign of a top.

worked last time

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2014-07-02 09:41:50

More more more dont stop till you get enough…..my my my boogie shoes

Very underrated band of the 80’s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atJD2AtQ1TQ

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-07-02 18:21:39

Loved the song; thanks for posting. Also liked this gem, also by Kid Creole (cheesiest video ever).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNrdguuXTF8

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-07-02 21:38:48

I always loved this one, a gem from those days:

Endicott - Kid Creole and the Coconuts

“I’ll never be, I’ll never be, like Endicott - no Endicott in me.”

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2014-07-03 16:04:29

cool……people here have good taste in music…

 
 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 06:13:48

Per the Chicago Tribune:

“In October 2005 Lereah was busy calling the bubble believers ‘Chicken Littles.’ Many of the predictions espoused by the ‘Chicken Littles’ are fast becoming closer to reality. … David Lereah has lost credibility because of his irresponsible cheerleading.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 07:46:09

David Lereah, like the other architects of the bubble, cried all the way to the bank. They are The Untouchables, as PBS’s Frontline correctly identified them, thanks to federal, state and local government policy.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 13:59:50

And set up millions of fools like bowling pins that came after, 2006-2014

 
 
 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-07-02 06:58:52

“Allow Wall Street to pay all your bills for you.”

And that I do. Realized another 500% gain Monday morning. Proceeds go to pay for my disability income insurance.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 05:01:35

Hold on to your cash. You re going to need every last penny of it.

Comment by Amy Hoax
2014-07-02 06:44:32

Declare independence from your landlord, buy a home today!

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-07-02 06:49:29

Declare independence from mortgage lenders. Rent a home today!

Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 09:15:38

So if I understand correctly Ben of this Blog is a landlord now?

Started by helping Banks fix abandoned homes now does it for himself. Then rents them out.

Moving from AZ to maybe Nevada to continue this work because AZ got too expensive to pencil out ?

I like it

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 11:04:52

And what did he pay? $15 a sq ft? Thats right around what a used house is worth….. right cactus?

 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 12:04:12

So maybe HA helped Ben get accurate estimates on how much it would cost to fix a 15 dollar a square foot trashed home to make it ready to rent out..

Explains a few things

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 13:55:42

It doesn’t need any fixing at $15/sq.

 
 
 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-07-02 07:00:14

Become a slave to bankers, depend on your neighbors for not turning ghetto, and become a slave to government: Buy a house today.

 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-07-02 07:27:59

Hey Amy -

Those 3-1/2 percenters are still waiting for their home tours. Mr Banker is anxious to get a few more subprime marks, business hasn’t been very good for him lately…

Got a busy day ahead of you, sweetie, no time to spend here

 
Comment by Puggs
2014-07-02 11:58:41

Declare your independence - Buy a home with cash at 1997 prices. Or rent until you can.

 
 
 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 05:07:44

Not much sympathy for Jamie Dimon:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-01/jamie-dimon-diagnosed-throat-cancer-start-radiation-and-chemotherapy

I’ve made some pretty raw comments over the years, but the commenters on this thread at zero hedge are way advanced over me. Whew, that’s some pretty rough stuff. Although I had a good laugh about the set of presidential cufflinks being put up on ebay, lmao!

Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 06:55:26

It’s funny how far you can get just by being presentable/likeable, even if what you’re doing is awful for the country/financial system. On another note, his daughters are legit hot and this means they’re going to inherit earlier. The two that went to Duke are pretty (esp the one that was rush chair of Pi Phi), the Columbia one is OK too.

Thank God Blankfein only had sons.

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 07:23:04

His progeny are not spared in the comments, either. L.M.A.O.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 07:40:59

They probably have more money than we can imagine (even though, as Han Solo said, we can imagine a lot). If anyone is laughing their butts off, it’s them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 08:01:19

“If anyone is laughing their butts off, it’s them.”

Ah, yes, the assured triumph of the pigmen progeny meme.

Things change. Even for them.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 09:13:00

Ah, yes, the assured triumph of the pigmen progeny meme.

Things change. Even for them.

I’m sure their Cayman Islands based trust funds have enough zeros to the right to last a few lifetimes, and that their weekly allowance is more than what the median American makes in a year.

We’re not talking about the town douchebag whose dad owns the Ford dealership.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 09:30:13

“their weekly allowance”

See also: The Rich Kids of Snapchat

http://www.businessinsider.com/rich-kids-of-snapchat-2014-7

 
 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2014-07-02 07:55:53

Sample ZH comment: Let’s all be more kind about his illness now. And send him a nail gun.

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 08:06:53

Yep, some pretty rough stuff. My fave is still the one about the presidential cufflinks on ebay.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 08:10:24

A Cuban doctor and a nail gun.

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 08:38:11

Sounds like the opening line of joke:

A Cuban doctor walks into a bar with a nail gun….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 08:33:42

Another sample: “Look on the bright side: his tumour has spread to regional lymph nodes.”

Ho-leee. :shock:

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 09:04:28

And that’s one of the more polite ones.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 05:32:00

Huge kudos to the protesters who blocked the buses full of illegals in Murrietta, California. At least the mayor is not a weasel like most politicians.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/07/01/migrants-buses-california-protests/11938555/

More of this, please. And faster.

Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 06:40:05

Racist.

 
 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 06:01:58

Scott Walker is a debt donkey.

http://wisconsinelectionwatch.com/17213/governor-walker-tripled-outstanding-debts-2011/

Year Assets Debts
2010 $5,000-$50,000 $55,000-$100,000
2011 $0 $175,000-$350,000
2012 $5,000-$50,000 $160,000-$250,000
2013 $20,000-$200,000 $115,000-$250,000

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 08:22:49

Liberace!

 
 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 06:05:57

Lawrenceville student body prez resigns over statements mocking white men:

http://nypost.com/2014/07/01/black-student-president-resigns-after-mocking-rich-white-guy-classmates/

Lawrenceville, BTW, is one of the elite private HS’s that feeds Ivy colleges. The tution? $53k/yr. LOL.

Reminder: Unless you can truly afford an elite HS, you’re better off sending your kids to a good public HS.

—————– (excerpt)

“After the Instagram photos surfaced, officials at the school — whose graduates include former Disney CEO Michael Eisner and media titans Malcolm Forbes and Randolph Hearst — told Peterson that she would face disciplinary action if she didn’t resign.

Many students and teachers at the prep institution — where annual tuition runs $53,000 — felt “it was not fitting of a student leader to make comments mocking members of the community,” said Dean of Students Nancy Thomas to the student paper.”

Comment by Northeastener
2014-07-02 09:33:31

Lol. Looks to me like she and her parents missed the memo on why you pay $50,000/yr to go to a school like that. It’s called making the right connections/friends early in life. Looks to me like she was too busy being an angry, black, lesbian promoting Black Panther extremist ideology to fit in with her wealthy, white peers.

Must be new money…

Comment by Hi-Z
2014-07-02 10:05:14

“Must be new money…”

More likely no money; there on a inclusiveness grant.

Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 12:49:15

This. It’s not new money. Top schools admit under represented minorities for athletic reasons, mostly.

And yes, it’s about the connections, not the education. Most of the kids at top prep schools would have a great shot at HYPSM or another good undergrad just based on alumni parents or other “soft factors” (they aren’t in the pool that has to quality on GPA/SAT).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 14:02:53

From auto repairs to law to education to housing….. I wouldn’t take your advice even if I were indemnified against the losses.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 06:11:32

The pitchforks are coming for the plutocrats.

—————————————-
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html

The Pitchforks Are Coming… For Us Plutocrats

By NICK HANAUER

July/August 2014

Memo: From Nick Hanauer

To: My Fellow Zillionaires

There is no example in human history where wealth accumulated like this and the pitchforks didn’t eventually come out. You show me a highly unequal society, and I will show you a police state. Or an uprising. There are no counterexamples. None. It’s not if, it’s when.

Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-07-02 07:04:05

” The pitchforks are coming for the plutocrats.”

So how are the Marxists supposed to tell the difference between crony capitalists and those wealthy people who EARNED THEIR WEALTH THROUGH HARD WORK?

Or does it matter to the drooling envious types who hate all wealth?

Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 07:46:04

My guess: the crony capitalists are wealthy beyond imagination and will stand out like sore thumbs.

Don’t kid yourself, Bill. You aren’t a member of the club. Your net worth is chump change to people who can afford to buy huge islands or pay 1 billion for a sports franchise.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-07-02 08:42:51

I think what they want is the cash, stowed away in savings and investment accounts, wherever they can find it. They don’t much care who technically ‘owns’ it as there is little respect for ownership any more, of any type.

Sure, it’s easier to go after the 1/.1/.00001/whatever small percenters, but there’s just not enough cash there in the aggregate. So they have their eyes on bigger but more distributed prizes.

And if the cash isn’t there in some particular account when they finally go after it, because it’s already been spent on overpriced houses and other consumer items? It’s all good.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2014-07-02 09:16:26

I think most poor people who receive government benefits think the money is just printed up by the government, it’s not really taken from someone else. To some extent theyŕe correct in this belief.

People calling for wealth redistribution are usually from the upper middle class bourgeoisie. This is also the group that creates and leads revolutions, not the poor. Che, Fidel, Lenin, Trotsky, Bin Laden, all from upper middle class or higher families. The Iranian revolution was a middle class college student uprising, as were many of the Arab Spring uprisings, like Egypt and Syria. A stymied middle class can be a dangerous thing. The poor are easier to deal with, theyŕe used to getting the shaft.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2014-07-02 09:33:07

The Founding Fathers were likewise mostly from the bourgeoisie, not a bunch of poor down-and-out types.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 11:10:04

That’s correct, Oddfellow. The French Revolution was also led by rich people. From what I recall, it was fairly prosperous people who made South Korea more democratic a few decades ago.

 
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2014-07-02 09:02:39

“Don’t kid yourself, Bill. You aren’t a member of the club”

That is bull poop.

1. You don’t know my net worth.

2. It’s subjective. To some people anyone with $500,000 is rich.

I am not convinced by your subjectivism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 09:16:58

You’re not a member of the club.

Club members have direct ownership stake in things. Controlling interest, management power, a say in how they are regulated and who audits the company, who prepares their shelf offerings, how the corp is structured for tax reasons, etc.

People who are in the club do not work for a salary, especially not a salary decided by anyone other than themselves.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2014-07-02 09:17:28

1. You don’t know my net worth.

You’ve let it slip here before; anyone who cared to read closely has a fairly good idea.

 
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 09:35:33

Bill, you’re not a member of the club. Whatever the wealth, you simply don’t have the attitude for it.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2014-07-02 09:36:53

“People who are in the club do not work for a salary, especially not a salary decided by anyone other than themselves.”

More bull poop.

How can you tell by looking at a person whether they have a salary or not? Good grief. No logic on HBB

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2014-07-02 09:38:22

“You’ve let it slip here before; anyone who cared to read closely has a fairly good idea.”

More bull poop.

My net worth changes daily. It is even much higher now than it was January 1 of this year.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2014-07-02 09:40:04

Face it. You are all commies. Anyone who hates ANY wealthy cannot agree among themselves at what net worth “wealthy is.” Liberace’s definition of not on salary is not the same as the next person. Stop your excuses and face it.

 
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 09:54:24

Now you’re just proving that you’re not a member of the club. If you have to argue about the definition of “wealthy,” then you are not wealthy enough. You want to be in that club, but you’re not, and deep down you know you can’t buy your way in, and deep down you know that you’re not that type of people person anyway, and you’re jealous, and you’re giving yourself away with the bitter posts.

Go swim some laps and have some oatmeal…. alone.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 09:57:57

“You are all commies”

So touchy, Bill.

I have some extended family that married into a 19th century Chicago industrial fortune (Social Register, Onwentsia Golf Club, et cetera). I have more respect that you earned your pile than that they just happened to be be born into it.

Just keep WINNING and ignore the haterz.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 10:19:41

Just keep WINNING and ignore the haterz.

And we are due to PM prices, thanks Obama.

 
Comment by Elanor
2014-07-02 10:26:44

Bill, you are right about one thing: some members of the club do have a salary set by others. By the board of directors of the company they lead. OK?

But you still are not, and never will be, in the Club.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 10:30:11

1. You don’t know my net worth.

I know you can’t afford to buy a Hawaiian Island, your own Gulfstream, a $20M mansion in Aspen or an NBA franchise.

You’re not in the club. You’re “little people” and you know it, hence your obsession with personal guns to protect yourself and your property.

 
Comment by polly
2014-07-02 10:43:58

Way back when, I heard the chief counsel of Goldman Sachs say how much money he thought you needed to be able to do whatever you wanted. That isn’t even necessarily “in the club,” but it it getting close. He thought that income (partnership draw only, income from investments is for reinvesting, not living expenses) of $10 million a year might be enough. And that was 20 years ago.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 10:44:11

Just keep WINNING and ignore the haterz.

No hating, just saying that Bill, who does a good job of keeping his wealth hidden, won’t be a target for the pitchfork and torches crowd. They’ll be ransacking the mansions, not the apartment complex where Bill lives.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 11:14:08

You don’t know my net worth.

Haven’t you posted what you claim to be your net worth a few times? Some time around six or nine months ago you wrote that it was $1.732 million. Then, a few months later, it was $1.8 million.

Either we know or you were dishonset.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2014-07-02 11:52:03

But you don’t know my net worth today. .

 
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 12:02:18

Good for you Bill! You go and you tell ‘em that you’re now worth $2.1 million instead of $1.8 million. They’ll let you in yet! :roll:

Just remember that the club doesn’t maintain their own arsenal. They have people for that.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 12:32:45

Exactly, oxide, how much could it have increased in a few months.

 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 12:52:57

It’s not an amount of money, per se, it’s ability to control assets and resources on a direct level. It’s the ability to dictate your terms in a meaningful way. It also implies the type of connections and knowledge to be able to get INSIDER deals on things, to get in on the ground level, etc. People who have this kind of control are vultures, they have an aggressive/dominant personality, they’re not working for anyone else after a certain point in life. They don’t know WTF a manager or supervisor or boss is. They know how to talk to the people who actually make big decisions.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 17:07:05

People who have this kind of control are vultures, they have an aggressive/dominant personality

You forget that some of them merely inherited their wealth. Some of those people are actually quite calm and relaxed.

 
Comment by jane
2014-07-02 23:54:05

Speaking as a salary serf who has lived amongst The Anointed: the thing I noticed most is their utter composure. The lack of fear. In truth, the failure to manipulate. I guess I was never worth manipulating.

Startling - by way of contrast - to the circumlocutions and inward-focused one upsmanship moves I witness every day in the tier right underneath the agency heads. (I personally do not get to see agency heads, of course. The Ones who do go see them feel no obligation to report back.) The maneuverings are typical lower middle class moves. The ones who are trying to get there, and count their little parries as numbers on the scoreboard. They do not understand that they are not anywhere near the correct stadium.

The real rich, who don’t need to ask permission from anybody to do anything - they really don’t give a d*mn what you think. If it pleases them to converse, they will do so, and they will pursue the course of action they want to pursue. We are not owed explanations.

Try this experiment sometime. When in the company of some manipulator, don’t take the hook. Every manipulation is, at its bottom, an attempt to win this round through fear. Assume the composure you might imagine ??Warren Buffett?? has. IT FREAKS THEM OUT - they’re always afraid of losing their jobs, so they think everybody else is as well!

My alibi is, I’m looking at what’s best for the business, and I’m driven by facts. So, I have no fear.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2014-07-03 00:48:38

But you don’t know my net worth today. .

Who cares what it is _precisely_ on any given day? We know a range that is close enough for government work.

And don’t take me as a hater just because I contradicted you—I don’t reveal my net worth here because I like my privacy, but I respect the effort both to earn and to safe a significant portion of your earnings.

 
Comment by rms
2014-07-03 21:55:11

“You’re not a member of the club.”

As Spring Break approached one year when I was at CalPoly, SLO someone caught a photo of a youthful “polly-dolly” in her ratty denim bibs at the airport climbing aboard a Gulfstream jet with those upturned wingtips.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 07:52:34

I read the piece and disagree for one reason - people have to be hungry to turn out into the streets. As long as they have the basics - food, clothing and shelter - they’re not going to turn out into the street.

Now, they are being strained on the last and to a lesser degree, on the first. Additionally the declining standard of living which hurts their aspirational goals for their children will grow discontent. Also, rising inequality and perceived or real government support for the ultra-wealthy will also grow discontent.

But… picking up pitchforks requires some immediate discomfort it seems to me. We’d actually have to start seeing some turnover in politicians before anything starts changing.

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 08:09:22

Yesterday a small group turned back the buses in Murrietta. It’s starting.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 08:55:48

Re: being strained on shelter: politicians and the central bank institute policies to restrict supply and drive both rents and house prices higher. And it works, they can manipulate the real estate market quite effectively. It serves to keep property taxes up and enrich the FIRE sector. It’s a pure trickle-up policy, regardless of any Orwellian/Machiavellian pronouncements of pursuing goals of “housing affordability” from government real estate agency officials.

I suspect it will have consequences though. Not because the public will follow exactly how government and central bank policies damage them, but due to a general sense of malaise that higher de facto inflation and cost of necessities creates.

Comment by drumminj
2014-07-02 14:58:46

Not because the public will follow exactly how government and central bank policies damage them, but due to a general sense of malaise that higher de facto inflation and cost of necessities creates.

Sadly, I think this gets misdirected. See the outrage towards Google and their employees in San Francisco. The outrage/frustration seems to get directed at folks who aren’t doing the manipulation, but who are doing “better than most”. I say “sadly” because the recipients of this outrage are working for a living, and aren’t the ones causing the problems.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 09:16:36

+100

And what about Ancient Rome? Huge inequality but no real pitchforks. The dole and bread and circuses worked.

Meanwhile, the French Revolution was caused by direct starvation, summarized as “Let them eat cake.” As was the Arab spring, which was started by the high price of food.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 10:04:01

And what about Ancient Rome? Huge inequality but no real pitchforks. The dole and bread and circuses worked

Spartacus? The bread and circuses had to be paid for and the slaves provided the funds for it. Only Roman citizens received anything from the government or the people running for office. Slave revolts do count as pitchforks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2014-07-02 10:19:09

I thought the Roman Republic fell because of battles between the various social and political classes. The populares and the optimates. The popular and the best.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 10:23:08

It fell because the rich bought the poor citizens’ votes until they decided to just lose the pretense of a democracy. The Roman Empire fell when even the job of defending the empire was being done by non-citizens.

 
 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 12:55:37

I think the reason people in the US won’t grab pitchforks anytime soon is, the top .01% has succeeded in portraying the idea that it’s a 2-team contest and that the 2 teams should be mad at each other. The idea that the 100k earner should look down on the poor person, or the idea that the poor person should be jealous of his/her manager or McDonalds franchise owner, not the ACTUAL people who run the big show.

If the pitchfork moment really ever comes, it would need to be directed at the actual plutocrats, which means a) NYC and b) DC.

Instead, people in the US squabble over birth control (in 2014!), public employee unions, abortion, and other LOL-issues.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 17:21:18

I think the reason people in the US won’t grab pitchforks anytime soon is, the top .01% has succeeded in portraying the idea that it’s a 2-team contest and that the 2 teams should be mad at each other. The idea that the 100k earner should look down on the poor person, or the idea that the poor person should be jealous of his/her manager or McDonalds franchise owner, not the ACTUAL people who run the big show.

You make some good points here. One simple way to avoid the two team contest issue is to have people think more in terms of issues than parties or candidates.

I also thought of your point when the OWS people started talking about the 1% vs. the 99%. In order for the 99% to all work together, people making zero to $350k all have to think of themselves as being in the same boat.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2014-07-02 19:55:52

OWS and the Tea Party are both, in their own ways, middle class movements. That’s why they must be kept in opposition to each other. The PTB’s greatest fear is the middle class united against them.

 
 
 
Comment by Pete
2014-07-02 16:18:53

“people have to be hungry to turn out into the streets.”

I’m sure each geographical area/culture has it’s own limits, but hunger is a good marker. If our descent is slow enough, it will be a long wait. What I do know is that different parts of the world show us daily just what we as humans are capable of adapting to/tolerating. Where we sit on that chart is hard to gauge, as we really haven’t been around that long.

We have had it “good” for a long time. Rome had it good much longer, but things change more quickly these days, so….

Yeah, I’ll stick with hunger as the main driver of revolution.

 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 06:18:58

Denver Post reports on the Permanent Democrat Supermajority

“Those wanting to make an appointment to get the new driver’s license for noncitizens overwhelmed the system Tuesday — the first day appointments were being scheduled.

Officials from the Department of Motor Vehicles did not answer specific questions Tuesday but said the website for appointments had approximately 60,000 hits in less than an hour Tuesday.

The licenses, a result of Senate Bill 251 approved by the Colorado legislature in 2013, will allow those who do not have a valid social security number — including immigrants in the country illegally and others in the country with temporary legal status — to obtain a driver’s license starting next month if they can prove they live in Colorado.”

Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 06:26:36

Wow, just wow.

< 50% of school age kids today are white and it’s going to continue to drop because we’ve disincentivized upwardly mobile white people from having kids by making college needlessly expensive, inadequately funding public schools, and not having single payer health care.

When you and I are 50, we’re going to be in the minority among working age people. When we’re 60, we’re going to feel like we have no country.

Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 06:34:20

Umm, isn’t it like racis and stuff to discuss these topics?

It’s only a matter of time until the Permanent Democrat Supermajority enacts a Social Justice™ Tax to atone for the sins of colonialism, slavery, segregation, et cetera.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2014-07-02 08:26:05

Social Justice™ Tax

Payable only by white folks, I presume?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 10:06:52

Payable by anyone that has money. Detroit was willing to tax anyone that would stay in the community long enough.

 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 06:48:45

I do not care whether in twenty or thirty years the country is majority white or not. I do deeply care whether the population has an average IQ of 100 or more. With the immigrants we are letting in, I am sure it will be lower than the present level of 98. At Ellis Island people were turned away that had diseases or the officials thought they would be a burden on society. Now, we seem to encourage such immigration. Combine that with policies that encourage low IQ people to breed and “Idiocracy” is our future.

Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 06:59:25

That’s racis, Dannyboy.

My liberal betters inform me that the importation of tens of millions of illiterate third-world peasants will enrich America with cultural contributions and technological innovations that will equal, if not exceed, those made by Irish, Italian, Jewish immigrants who came to America 150 to 100 years ago.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 07:02:50

This is true of the whites who are breeding these days as well. Idiocracy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 08:32:06

I grew up in an overwhelmingly white neighborhood of mostly middle class folks, generally professional. There was one white underclass family which lived near me. They caused all kinds of problems in the neighborhood, from loud parties to theft to vandalism. They attracted dysfunction from the wider neighborhood. The cops were there not infrequently. The parents were truculent and unapologetic, encouraging the mess.

There were about two black families I knew of. Never any problems, quiet, employed.

Now, don’t get me wrong - the plural of anecdote is not data. I’ve read the FBI statistics which show blacks statistically have much higher rates of crime and dysfunction than whites.

BUT - the differentiator is intelligence, values and temperament. In immigration policy we should deal with this obvious reality. We’re not doing ourselves any favors by importing MS-13 OR the chavalry.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2014-07-02 12:36:05

I disagree the differentiation is the lack of English skills……90% of inmates speak a foreign language call Ebonics. That’s why they almost always come back, there are very few job that require you to speak that language.

My plan is: as soon as you can read the NY Times and discus the stories in depth, you can apply for parole. If that takes 5 years or 50 its your choice.

the differentiator is intelligence, values and temperament

 
Comment by Pete
2014-07-02 16:22:55

“speak a foreign language call Ebonics.”

That is funny.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-07-02 19:01:49

DNC officials like Nancy Pelosi are salivating at the prospect of signing up all those new votes-for-entitlements lifelong Democrats. The dumber the better - easier to manipulate and breed more new Dems.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 10:29:51

When you and I are 50, we’re going to be in the minority among working age people. When we’re 60, we’re going to feel like we have no country.”

And when you’re 70 they will toss you on the street. This should be no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention.

Got kids ?

Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 12:27:37

Last month James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute suggested in The Week magazine that perhaps one way to spur economic growth in the U.S. is to encourage families to have more children. He points out that fewer children mean fewer workers in the future and fewer tax dollars to pay for social programs. It’s an interesting idea to say the least, one embraced by another world power…Russia.

Yahoo Finance asked economist and author Ben Stein what he thought of such an idea here in the states.

“I think it’s an incredibly terrible Idea,” he says. “I’m stunned that somebody coming out ot the American Enterprise Institute…would come up with that idea — even if he was doing it as a joke it’s not a very funny joke.”

To be fair, Pethokoukis wasn’t suggesting government mandated procreation, but rather incentives to grow the population. No matter how you slice it Stein says it simply wouldn’t work.

“There’s no evidence that countries that have larger numbers of children per family are richer than other countries,” he argues. “In fact the evidence is entirely to the contrary.. But we know that when families in this country have children they often wind up being heroin addicts. That doesn’t help the economy very much either.”

Stein argues just because in some instances (white upper middle class instances he says) more children seem to equal more wealth, doesn’t mean it’s the children that caused it. He backs it up by positing, “the lower income groups in this country have by far the highest number of children per family.”

Actual data aside, Stein says anything resembling such a plan is simply out of touch with the reality of parenting.

“I think the person that wrote this article must not be a parent because it’s an incredible amount of work being a parent,” he says. “To wish that upon anybody, to force anyone to undertake that kind of labor is akin to enforced and involuntary servitude. It’s an incredible expense to have children so let’s not have government telling us how many children we can have.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 12:45:59

He points out that fewer children mean fewer workers in the future and fewer tax dollars to pay for social programs.

Working what jobs? And at what salary? Enough to put them in a wage bracket high enough to take taxs from?

 
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 13:40:15

The focus on more population = more prosperity has a distinct element of nonsense.

The dividend is delayed
Hopes that Africa’s dramatic population bulge may create prosperity seem to have been overdone
Mar 8th 2014

To make matters worse, many economists fret that the recent story of “rising Africa”—a virtuous circle of economic growth and improved governance—is already starting to wear thin. Dani Rodrik of Princeton University, for example, reckons that manufacturing and private investment have hardly budged despite a decade of rising incomes. Some economists, to be sure, say that Africa is ripe for a manufacturing surge. But it is still the case that African growth depends heavily on commodity exports to China, where demand for raw materials is slowing.

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21598646-hopes-africas-dramatic-population-bulge-may-create-prosperity-seem-have

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 11:27:51

When you and I are 50, we’re going to be in the minority among working age people. When we’re 60, we’re going to feel like we have no country.

You live in a city that is mostly non-white and you work in another city that is also mostyl non-white. You might not notice the difference.

Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 12:58:19

You live in a city that is mostly non-white and you work in another city that is also mostyl non-white. You might not notice the difference.

———-

True, but this is due to segregation. Cities in the NE are very segregated. Downtown and NW DC are blindingly white. SE and N Baltimore are the same. But I don’t think this will work for the country as a whole. And you have to keep in mind, DC and Balt suburbs are extremely white.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2014-07-02 16:53:54

JJJjoe Its NOT due to segregation, white flight is a myth

The real cause of this divide is ENGLISH. Not Color

“White” flight was a result of people coming into the school system who were on a jail track not on a college track so parents made a choice to move to the burbs, remember middle class BLACK families did the same.

 
 
 
Comment by jane
2014-07-03 00:09:52

The only saving grace is that the resentful minorities, nanny-staters and tit-suckers are some of the most heavily urbanized people on earth. They are afraid to leave the smell of asphalt and crack pipes.

They are afraid of anything they don’t know. They must cluster, like schools of fish.

Solution? Consider a place that’s on the long edge of a tank of gas away. Arrange your affairs so that you can make a living from anywhere. Don’t say a word - it’ll attract the MS-13′ers, as well as bring on some campaign or other from the resentful minorities, nanny-staters, and tit-suckers.

 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2014-07-02 08:15:32

Colorado: The next California.

Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 08:34:14

Overpriced housing? Check.
Traffic and air pollution? Check.
More free sh*t for illegals? Check.
Transformation into a two-tiered society with no middle class? Check.

At least there’s legal weed to help take your mind off of these problems 8)

Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 09:01:09

FWIW, I’m not seeing the number of illegals now that I saw during the construction bubble. Of course, the Mexodus could change that in blink of an eye. Of course, that requires jobs for them, and right now their traditional bastions, home construction and food services, still aren’t what they used to be.

The local paper announced that two restaurants went out of business in my little burg, and on the rare occasions when I go out to eat I’m not seeing crowds, not even in Denver. I saw a lot of people brown bagging it at Comic Con two weeks ago (even though technically it’s not allowed), instead of buying a bland $8 sandwich and washing it down with a $4 coke.

Truth be told, I’d rather pick up some tenderloins on the way home and make them myself. It’s far cheaper than eating crap at Applebee’s and way better.

Transformation into a two-tiered society with no middle class? Check.

Isn’t that a nationwide kind of deal?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2014-07-02 09:41:50

I’m also seeing saturation. Any low skill job that could be filled by an illegal has already been filled by an illegal. I suppose the next wave of illegals could try to undercut the wages of the illegals already here. That will make for interesting times.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 12:32:51

The poor cannot afford the legal weed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 13:20:20

Back To The Garden on South Broadway sells three grams of the most killer sh*t that will make you peel your skull open to take a better look inside for just $20, Dannyboy.

That’s about what a case of Duff or two 6-packs of a decent IPA costs.

If someone smokes so much weed that they can’t afford to pay $20 for three grams, they’ve probably got some serious life-functioning issues…

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 13:29:01

If that is an advertisement you need to send a check to Ben.

 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 13:35:56

I’ll be in La Veta tonight and tomorrow, just across the NM state line, meet me up there and I’ll give you a free sample.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 13:55:41

Checking out the FEMA camp near by? 8) You will need the glasses. Seriously, it is nice country but I am no where near there today. BTW, if you head down to Las Vegas, NM you can see where they shot Red Dawn.

http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/fema/camps-colorado/

 
 
 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 08:36:30

Ain’t it da trute?

 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 09:22:10

Maybe. CA’s public schools and in shambles outside of the absolutely wealthy areas (homes 2 MM+ to buy or 10k/month to rent). I don’t see that in CO yet, but California def is the canary in the coal mine.

CA’s public universities are done here as well, with the exception of Cal-Berkeley and, for med school, UCSF.

The combination of adverse demographics and underfunding by the state has really f’ed them up. It doesn’t help that the wealthy don’t want their kids at a UC anyway.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 09:39:56

It doesn’t help that the wealthy don’t want their kids at a UC anyway.

Are you sure about that? UC is very selective. Kids with 4.0’s and good SATs get turned away from most campuses (UCLA, UCSD, Irvine, Davis, etc.). I also recall reading once that the average UC student comes from a wealthier family than the average Stanford student

Cal State is another matter.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 12:06:19

Cal State is another matter.”

Cal Poly SLO is very good

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 06:52:52

Because my Sky Wizard is better than your Sky Wizard

Wall Street Journal - Clashes Erupt in Jerusalem After Body Is Found

“The death of a Palestinean teenager sparked clashes between protesters and Israeli police in East Jerusalem on Wednesday after rumors spread that the youth was lynched by Jewish vigilantes to avenge the kidnapping and killing of three Israeli teenagers.”

Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine, CA
2014-07-02 07:07:46

The USA must get COMPLETELY out of the Middle East and absolutely no foreign aid. If Israel was good enough to be an independent jewish nation it would not need propped and its neighbors as well as minorities would not be violent against jews.

Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 07:21:46

Yup. As I said before, let the Jewish Israelis immigrate to the USA, they’ll add more to this country than just lice and scabies and MS-13.

Israel was well intentioned, but it was a mistake. Time to pull the plug. And not another penny sent to the Middle East for anybody.

Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 12:30:56

Israel was well intentioned, but it was a mistake. Time to pull the plug. And not another penny sent to the Middle East for anybody.

I think that you have that backwards. Due to anti-Semitism it was thought that the Jews needed their own country. This was a reasonable idea. The problem was that they picked an area that belonged to someone else. In fact, the phrase “A land without a people for a people without a land” was used, originally by Christian supporters of Zionism, then later by European Jews.

On the other hand, now that that nation has been established, it’s not reasonable or practical to call for its abolotion and the uprooting of its people.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 13:31:17

I would rather assimilate 5 million new citizens and give them the First Amendment protection of freedom of religion than continue giving billions of dollars in direct aid to Israel every year and indirectly spending hundreds of billions of dollars to maintain a military industrial complex to ensure their safety (and fat Americans’ right to drive 15mpg SUVs) in a region where they are surrounded by hundreds of millions who believe their Sky Wizard is better.

 
Comment by drumminj
2014-07-02 15:03:50

I would rather assimilate 5 million new citizens…

+1

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2014-07-02 16:57:34

Goon shouldn’t they be required to speak English first. My grandmother had to at Ellis Island!!

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 17:08:37

There shouldn’t be any need to continue give Israel $3 billion a year. They’re quite a prosperous country at this point.

 
 
 
Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 07:24:25

Amen, brothah!

Abe Foxman called, he’d like a word with you.

 
Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 09:26:16

Sounds good but when you get down to it, the US has to be there in some way until we don’t need oil anymore. If US leaves ME, who is going to protect the big Saudi fields, run the refineries, etc? ME are not capable of doing this at all. US and other multinational corps are just far more efficient than anything the ME could muster. If production falls, you get into a very big supply/demand problem.

We should just admit, yes, dammit, we’re there for the oil. This would be a) honest and b) financially sound, bc it means we stop doing nation building.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 10:09:29

We should just admit, yes, dammit, we’re there for the oil. This would be a) honest and b) financially sound, bc it means we stop doing nation building.

For the oil and the money that they have due to their sale of oil. Russia and China seems to be the big winners in Iraq.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 10:13:09

seems= seem, BTW can’t we find some used planes to sell the Iraq government? Putin seems, never, to miss an opportunity to expand Russian influence without costing Russia anything. In fact, Russia always seems to benefit economically. I think if Russia had invaded Iraq, they would be getting paid back with interest for all the money they expended.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 12:10:38

the US has to be there in some way until we don’t need oil anymore.”

I think it was a deal , US will export Crude in return for not defending middle east oil. Our allies must be really freaked the US is letting radical Islam take over , so we promise oil - to the highest bidder however. not so great for the US consumer.

Fits in with Obama wanting to get rid of far flung suburbia, cheap energy and everyone ride the bus, the government bus.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 12:11:47

If US leaves ME, who is going to protect the big Saudi fields, run the refineries, etc? ME are not capable of doing this at all.”

China

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Hi-Z
2014-07-02 10:23:10

“..its neighbors as well as minorities would not be violent against jews.”

I am not jewish but you seem to have your head in the clouds if you seriously think this.

 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 08:14:56

This is just sad

Bloomberg - Vacation-Phobic Americans Donate a Million Years of Work Annually

“The U.S. stands alone among developed countries by not mandating vacation time. Of those who get vacation time, four in 10 Americans stockpile them, failing to take all the days they’re offered. Those stay-at-work Americans leave an average of 8.1 days unused, according to a 2014 Oxford Economics analysis. That’s about 429 unused days per year.

Those million-plus years are one big gift to corporate America — and a gesture that doesn’t do employers or their employees much good. Few cultures can match the U.S. for its ability to stigmatize vacation time.”

Comment by jose canusi
2014-07-02 08:24:23

Meanwhile, Europeans get like six weeks or something. And have no compunctions about “going on holiday”.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 08:37:52

Management is naturally organized. Business owners are naturally organized and more politically active. It’s the nature of the beast. Labor is fragmented and disorganized. The result is labor gets less and less of the pie and owners and managers get more and more.

Once upon a time, politicians were supposedly looking out for the population at large. But today, and for quite some time now, with looser campaign finance laws, it’s been government of the highest bidder, by the highest bidder, for the highest bidder. They unapologetically carry water for their biggest donors. They facilitate moving factories offshore and importing more and more labor. All to increase profit for owners and executives.

Unions? They’ve taken a lot of hits. They’re not a perfect solution obviously. But they are one way of organizing labor to compete with owners and executives for a piece of the pie which both work to create.

Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 08:48:36

They unapologetically carry water for their biggest donors.

And it is true that unions are among the biggest donors, per Open Secrets (www.opensecrets.org). However, there is one big differentiation - business interests can much more effectively employ and compensate a politician once he leaves office, than can a union. That is a powerful carrot to wave in front of a politician or regulator who’s trying to figure out what career path to take next.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-07-02 09:59:19

Don’t let any facts get in your way…

Heavy Hitters: Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2014
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

1 ActBlue $107,563,973 UNION
2 American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $62,182,379 UNION
3 National Education Assn $59,005,000 56% 4%
4 AT&T Inc $57,225,773 41% 57%
5 National Assn of Realtors $55,561,528 41% 44%
6 Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $45,966,856 91% 2%
7 Goldman Sachs $45,954,910 52% 43%
8 Carpenters & Joiners Union $42,339,785 70% 9%
9 United Auto Workers $41,925,128 71% 0%
10 Service Employees International Union $38,663,398 84% 2%
11 Laborers Union $38,408,370 83% 7%
12 American Federation of Teachers $37,663,325 89% 0%
13 Teamsters Union $36,528,957 87% 5%
14 Communications Workers of America $36,340,373 86% 0%
15 JPMorgan Chase & Co $35,185,676 47% 51%
16 United Food & Commercial Workers Union $34,239,403 86% 0%
17 United Parcel Service $32,826,166 35% 64%
18 Citigroup Inc $32,606,867 48% 50%
19 National Auto Dealers Assn $32,423,910 31% 68%
20 EMILY’s List $32,076,849 98% 0%
21 American Bankers Assn $31,838,502 36% 63%
22 AFL-CIO $31,688,319 60% 3%

Comment by Neuromance
2014-07-02 15:19:40

So, unions have costs and benefits. When unions get too strong, one gets increasing inefficiency. Inability to fire workers when there is an business reason to do so, out of balance wages and so on. When management gets too strong, you get poor working conditions and suppressed wages.

It’s a balance. I saw a slogan on a vehicle some time ago: “Unions: The people who brought you the weekend.”

This symptom of not using vacation time - it’s likely a result of a sense of a precarious employment situation, not because people just love staying at the office, with all of its amenities.

Also, I’d say politicians are less able to be influenced by unions because unions are not able to provide the promise of on-going compensation, after the politician has left office, or provide benefits to the politicians’ family. Business organizations are able to provide this follow-on benefit much more effectively.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-07-02 10:03:09

Don’t let any facts get in your way…

Heavy Hitters: Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2014
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

Organization Total ‘89-’14 Dem % Repub %
1 ActBlue $107,563,973 99% 0% UNION
2 American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $62,182,379 80% 1% UNION
3 National Education Assn $59,005,000 56% 4% UNION
4 AT&T Inc $57,225,773 41% 57%
5 National Assn of Realtors $55,561,528 41% 44%
6 Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $45,966,856 91% 2% UNION
7 Goldman Sachs $45,954,910 52% 43%
8 Carpenters & Joiners Union $42,339,785 70% 9% UNION
9 United Auto Workers $41,925,128 71% 0% UNION
10 Service Employees International Union $38,663,398 84% 2% UNION
11 Laborers Union $38,408,370 83% 7% UNION
12 American Federation of Teachers $37,663,325 89% 0% UNION
13 Teamsters Union $36,528,957 87% 5% UNION
14 Communications Workers of America $36,340,373 86% 0% UNION
15 JPMorgan Chase & Co $35,185,676 47% 51%
16 United Food & Commercial Workers Union $34,239,403 86% 0% UNION
17 United Parcel Service $32,826,166 35% 64%
18 Citigroup Inc $32,606,867 48% 50%
19 National Auto Dealers Assn $32,423,910 31% 68%
20 EMILY’s List $32,076,849 98% 0% PRO ABORTION
21 American Bankers Assn $31,838,502 36% 63%
22 AFL-CIO $31,688,319 60% 3% UNION

Comment by goon squad
2014-07-02 10:38:12

Those godd@mn labor unions are gonna take over the country ANY DAY NOW! And, apparently, go abort some fetuses too.

Hopefully Sheldon Adelson can buy himself a GOP candidate (and get by with a little help from his Koch) to stop those scary, scary, bad labor unions (whose membership has been declining for 60 years) and Take America Back™ and Restore Our Future!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 12:54:47

Goon don’t worry the fabricated NASA numbers will be coming out in a few weeks:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/01/uah-global-temaperture-update-not-much-change/

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 13:36:26

BTW, look out Texas everything is bigger in China:

Xinhua)
Updated: 2014-07-02 09:54
Counter:6

China’s second-largest hydropower station started full operation on Tuesday after its last generating unit completed a three-day test run late on Monday.

With 18 large generators and a total capacity of 13.86 gigawatts, Xiluodu is the world’s third-largest station after the Three Gorges and Itaipu hydroelectric projects, according to its operator, China Three Gorges Corporation.

The station can generate 57.1 billion kwh of electricity a year, which can replace 20 million tonnes of coal and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of 48 million tonnes.

Construction of the Xiluodu hydropower station, located in the Jinsha River, a major headstream of the Yangtze in southwestern Yunnan and Sichuan provinces, started in 2005.

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-07-02 08:49:38

I remember when it was the Japanese who were the leaders at not taking their vacations. But there’s a new champ in town, folks! And to put into perspective how devoted we are to our jobs, even though we get less paid time off, we still leave more vacation hours on the table than anyone else.

USA! USA! USA!

Comment by j-j-j-joe
2014-07-02 09:27:17

Silly Colorado, vacations are only for wussy Euros from wealthy countries.

 
 
Comment by drumminj
2014-07-02 15:05:28


Those million-plus years are one big gift to corporate America

I see it as a savings plan. I expect to get paid out those stockpiled days if and when I leave the company.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 10:07:47

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/dow-flirts-with-17-000–but-most-people-missed-the-ride-202459906.html

Still, McBride says that if someone saving for retirement was smart enough to stick with stocks through the past five years, they may be OK, other economic factors aside. But McBride is just not sure how many investors had the wisdom to do so. “The train may be back at the top of the mountain,” says McBride, “but you’re not there unless you stayed on the train.”

Comment by azdude
2014-07-02 14:55:12

Where are we in the cycle?

lather

rince

or repeat?

 
 
Comment by cactus
2014-07-02 12:31:33

No more fast food for San Francisco

CKE’s outspoken chief executive, Andy Puzder, has strong feelings about some recent issues and how they impact his business, including minimum wage hikes and tax policy.

Puzder gave the example that, “in Texas it takes 60-63 days to get permits. In Los Angeles it takes 280 days and in San Francisco we’re not sure how many days it takes because it has been so long since anyone could open a restaurant there.” These factors are crucial for new businesses because the property sits idle until permitting allows construction to begin, creating losses for every day there’s a delay, according to Puzder.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 12:49:25

How long to open a Chick-Fil-A in San Francisco?

Comment by azdude
2014-07-02 14:22:42

when hell freezes over?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 14:59:15

When Bill and Oxide hook-up and start a family? Wait, I think we are back to when hell freezes over.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 15:01:57

This is how you open a fast food joint in SF, the jokes just right themselves:
http://living.msn.com/food-drink/food-news/burger-king-launches-gay-friendly-whopper

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 15:13:32

right=write

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-07-02 13:26:06

Look, what we need is a big ole drop in the prices of houses and stocks. People need to be able to buy these things so they can have paid-for shelter and dividend income in their old age. Why is this so hard for the elite to understand? Are they lacking in intelligence?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-07-02 13:30:36

No, just compassion and ethics.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-07-02 17:12:38

Many of the elites own a lot of stock.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-07-02 14:48:53

FEMA Region IV checking in

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-07-02 17:07:31

Westchester County, NY Housing Prices Plummet 17% YoY As Rental Rates Crater 28%

Westchester Co NY Housing Prices Plunge 18% YoY As Rental Rates Dive 26% YoY

http://www.zillow.com/local-info/NY-Westchester-County-home-value/r_3148/#metric=mt%3D18%26dt%3D1%26tp%3D5%26rt%3D6%26r%3D3148%26el%3D0

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-07-02 20:33:39

Title insurance, now there is a scam. The exclude anything they find from being covered.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post