September 12, 2014

Bits Bucket for September 12, 2014

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

117 Comments »

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-09-12 04:13:06

“Evergrowing bank” may be an ironic name for this latest casualty of China’s shadow banking system.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-12/china-lender-faces-650-million-of-defaults-from-shadow-banking.html

A Chinese bank was saddled with $650 million of defaults from an off-balance-sheet lending arrangement that channeled money to one of its shareholders and an affiliate, according to a state media report.

Evergrowing Bank Co. in Shandong province repaid 3.7 billion yuan ($600 million) of principal and 300 million yuan of interest on Aug. 29 as guarantor for the borrowing, the People’s Daily said on its website today. Three calls to the lender for comment went unanswered.

Intricate structures for some off-balance-sheet lending by China’s banks make it harder for investors to assess risks to the financial system after an explosion in shadow banking. In some cases, banks have channeled money to companies through trusts or brokerages to bypass government limits on lending and requirements relating to provisions and capital.

Comment by azdude
2014-09-12 05:02:01

Cant they just print a little more money to get them over the hump?

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 05:57:44

Hmmm…off-balance-sheet lending….

Where have I heard that before?

Enron
Bailed out banks
The Feds

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 06:49:47

Fake it til ya make it.

 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-09-12 07:19:50

Doesn’t China execute fraudsters?

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 07:38:26

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-09-12 09:06:29

Doesn’t China execute fraudsters?

They all moved to the US, Canada and Oz.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 05:44:49

the loss of privacy continues…

quick - someone blame Bush

———

Yahoo: Feds made us spy or pay $250K a day in fines
Washington Times | 9/12/14 | Cheryl K Chumley

Yahoo executives said the federal government made them participate in a surveillance program and turn over key private client information — else face $250,000 per day in fines.

The insider account of how and why Yahoo helped the feds expand their spy program came to light just this week, after a judge ordered some materials…

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 06:33:23

Or blame the messenger.

Comment by azdude
2014-09-12 07:00:50

Where is the S H Y S T E R today?

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 07:39:51

Out cashing checks and snapping donkey necks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-09-12 07:48:45

AZ.Fraud is enraged.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2014-09-12 07:26:12

“quick- someone blame Bush”

“Yahoo said in a statement that feds changed a law during the George W. Bush administration that allowed government to demand certain user data from online services provided by the company.”

Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-09-12 09:39:49

Pffft… you and your facts! Facts have no place in conservative discourse… it’s all about the panicked screeching!

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-09-12 11:17:22

Nanners just got pwnd.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2014-09-12 07:27:27

Quick, somebody blame Bush.

O K A Y

“Enough to fine the company $250,000 every day it failed to hand them over in 2008, according to 1,500 pages of unsealed court documents. Yahoo user records were reportedly demanded for people located outside of the United States, including U.S. citizens, in 2007 as part of the National Security Agency’s secret PRISM surveillance program.”

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 07:42:30

Thank goodness all that spying stuff ended after they closed Guantanamo.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-09-12 09:08:04

Meet the new boss, he’s just like the old boss

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-09-12 09:49:23

It sure seems as if the majority out there don’t give a rat’s a$$ about the loss of privacy, as long as their criminals are the ones doing all the snooping…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 05:50:05

A couple of thoughts:

What ever happened to Global Warming???

Glad we are not dependent on Russia to heat our homes (like most of Europe)

Wood stoves are a beautiful thing.

A poorly made house with poor insulation is going suck this winter

And there is already snowing/frost warnings in the Midwest TODAY

——————-

Brutally Cold 2014-15 Winter Shaping Up For The United States
Firsthand Weather | 11SEP2014 | Matthew Holliday

The 2013-14 winter was a season that I will never be able to forget simply because of the kind of cold Arctic outbreaks that occurred throughout that year. What’s even more remarkable is that the 2013-14 winter became known as that winter that simply would not end, and even this summer, we have seen times when the mid and upper level pattern strongly resembled what would be typical of a winter pattern. We had pretty severe Arctic outbreaks in both 2009-10 and 2010-11 winters but for entirely different reasons than last winter. The main driver of last winter was the warm pool of above average waters over the northeastern Pacific, and this warm pool is still there! It is to blame for a lot of the volatility that we have seen this year in our temperatures across the United States.

The 2014-15 winter could also be strongly influenced by the warm pool in the northeast Pacific if it persists going into the winter months, and based on some of the things that I have been looking at, chances are good that it will. This would likely lead to another brutally cold winter in the central and eastern United States while the western U.S. would have above average temperatures, particularly in the Pacific Northwest. The good news is that I think central and southern California will receive above average precipitation, and that is due to a developing weak El Nino that will not necessarily be the main driver of this winter but will have some influence. This also means more precipitation across the southern states including the Southwest through the Southern Plains to parts of the Southeast. The regions where the cold air will be in place will have an increased chance at seeing more wintry weather this season, even in locations that typically don’t get any snow/ice.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-09-12 07:24:46

August turned out to be one of the coldest Augusts in Phoenix (by Phoenix standards). There are usually fifteen days of highs above 110. The hottest day last month was 109 on August 17. There were 12 days of 100 degrees and lower.

Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-09-12 11:19:37

And it’s been record-setting heat in Washington State.

Comment by rms
2014-09-12 19:01:57

“And it’s been record-setting heat in Washington State.”

+1 Not much for rainfall this summer in the Columbia Basin either.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by RSpringbok
2014-09-12 11:20:59

Global warming/climate change is here and is thought to be driving the east coast cold weather and the west coast drought. See

http://www.usu.edu/ust/index.cfm?article=53856

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 12:01:47

Yes - because there never/ever was a drought in the west before.

Al Gore predicted by now that there would be no ice shelf left in Antarctica and all the polar bears would be dead…

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-09-12 05:54:39

Virologist: ‘It’s Too Late, Ebola Will Kill 5 Million’

Expert says virus will infect entire population of African countries
Virologist: ‘It’s Too Late, Ebola Will Kill 5 Million’

by Paul Joseph Watson | September 12, 2014

A top German virologist has caused shockwaves by asserting that it’s too late to halt the spread of Ebola in Sierra Leone and Liberia and that five million people will die, noting that efforts should now be focused on stopping the transmission of the virus to other countries.

Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit of the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg told Germany’s Deutsche Welle that hope is all but lost for the inhabitants of Sierra Leone and Liberia and that the virus will only “burn itself out” when it has infected the entire population and killed five million people.

“The right time to get this epidemic under control in these countries has been missed,” said Schmidt-Chanasit. “That time was May and June. “Now it is too late.”

The current Ebola outbreak in West Africa has killed over 2200 people, with Liberia and Sierra Leone accounting for over 1700 of those fatalities.

While calling for “massive help” from the international community to prevent Ebola appearing in other countries like Nigeria and Senegal, Schmidt-Chanasit warns that getting a grip on the epidemic in Liberia and Sierra Leone is a departure from reality.

German aid organization Welthungerhilfe blasted Schmidt-Chanasit for his comments, with Sierra Leone based coordinator Jochen Moninger labeling his statements, “dangerous and moreover, not correct.” However, Moninger acknowledged that Schmidt-Chanasit’s assessment may be accurate in the case of Liberia.

The World Health Organization refused to comment on Schmidt-Chanasit’s remarks.

Although Ebola continues to rage in five African countries, media coverage of the epidemic has waned, despite evidence that the virus has mutated.

As we reported last month, former FDA official Scott Gottlieb, M.D. warned that if the virus was to hit the United States, the CDC would enact emergency procedures which could lead to healthy Americans who show no symptoms of the diseased being forcibly detained for an indefinite period of time.

Scientists in Canada and Canada’s Public Health Agency have both acknowledged that the virus has likely gone airborne at least to a limited degree, while the CDC has urged airline staff to take steps to prevent the airborne spread of the virus, including giving suspected Ebola victims surgical masks as well as directing staff to “not use compressed air, which might spread infectious material through the air.”

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:08:35

We heard the same story with AIDS in Africa…

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 06:37:11

My guess is that this larger Ebola outbreak will stop dead in its tracks long before 5 million deaths occur, due to quarantines and other similar actions to halt the spread of the disease, much as previous smaller Ebola outbreaks stopped as quickly as they flared up.

But the German virologist got his name along with his scary story into the international MSM, didn’t he?

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 06:51:20

Connect the dots. China’s presence is growing in Africa. They need to depopulate a continent to have a place for their rapidly growing population. And for their iron ore.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 05:56:02

What is even more shocking is being to collect a $135,000 tax-free pension (OT spiked with fake disability for a “back injury) after only 21 years (retired at age 45) of working as a public union goon.

It is no wonder every democrat and public union goon city will go bankrupt in the near future.

Gawd help you if you own a home or business in one of them…

————————————-

A retired cop’s shocking life of drugs and crime
NY Post | Phillip Messing

A retired police commander kept a stunning secret for more than two decades: Before joining the NYPD, he peddled crack, tried to murder a fellow drug dealer and was close pals with a notorious cop killer.

Corey Pegues — who collects a $135,000 tax-free line-of-duty disability pension for a back injury — revealed his sordid past on the “Combat Jack’’ podcast Aug. 13, in a blatant attempt to hype his yet-to-be-published book.

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 06:41:03

I think people really do not get how bad the abuses are unless they personally know someone who is benefitting from the ridiculous systems they have in place.

A person from Arizona and a person from Southern California have two entirely different frames of reference for public employees compensations and pensions. They are VERY different in these two places, very different. And it is not a cost of living thing because it includes places where the COL is not as jacked as in LA.

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:45:54

Q: What is the first thing a public union goon does when he retires?

A: Moves to a low tax and right to work state.

Comment by goon squad
2014-09-12 09:08:31

cool story bro

and you’re overdue for a reminder that government contractors cost taxpayers $500,000,000,000+ a year

that’s over half a trillion dollars, and by the way, we are hiring, i’m getting a referral bonus for a new employee starting next week

so keep bleating about how public labor unions and food stamps and section 8 are bankrupting this country

i am the free sh1t army

and your children will grow up to pay 70% marginal income tax rates, to pay for me doing what grover norquist calls shrinking the size of government to where you can shrink it in the bathtub

bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, looser!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goon squad
2014-09-12 09:14:55

drown it in the bathtub, but you get the idea

and i’m still waiting to hear how political candidates are going to run on a platform of taking free sh1t away from the free sh1t army, and get enough free sh1t army votes to win

as i correctly predicted, within a few decades, you will have the ‘choice’ of voting for the free sh1t party or the more free sh1t party

this is the future your children have to look forward to

as george w bush said in 2008, ‘this sucker could go down’

regards,

goon.squad.ctr@xxx.xxx.mil

 
Comment by Puggs
2014-09-12 09:31:47

‘This sucker could go down’

All it will take is a global financial panic to make it so. Once the dominoes start there is not much to stop it.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 10:12:50

Thanks for including the .mil reference. I’d like to see some retired generals and admirals determine how big our armed forces would be if they designed simply to defend the country, instead of controlling large parts of the world. It could be that we’re spending five to ten times as much as we need to spend. Thus the US Army would be a big part of the FS Army.

 
Comment by mathguy
2014-09-12 16:48:30

and you’re overdue for a reminder that government contractors cost taxpayers $500,000,000,000+ a year

that’s over half a trillion dollars, and by the way, we are hiring, i’m getting a referral bonus for a new employee starting next week

Goon,

Not that I don’t agree with you about government contractors getting a shit ton of money… but how about this statistic.

What dollar amount of products are produced by these government contractors (planes, ships, Internets, robots, etc..). Now what dollar amount of product is produced by the free sh1t army? you can break it down on a per capita basis or purely on ROI if you like.

 
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-09-12 06:45:24

It is no wonder every democrat and public union goon city will go bankrupt in the near future ??

Every democrat ?? Really ??

http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/6041ZA/307LEK/AS4Q6U/M9URLPT/EXVAWY/XL/h

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2014-09-12 06:58:05

“It is no wonder every democrat and public union goon city will go bankrupt in the near future.”

They should run citizen shakedown rackets and speed traps to fund their governments like many smaller municipalities that surround those big cities do.
__

“the chief prosecutor in Florissant Municipal Court makes $56,060 per year. It’s a position that requires him to work 12 court sessions per year, at about three hours per session.

That salary for the chief prosecutor works out to about $1,500 an hour. (If you worked full-time at that rate you’d make more than $3 million in a year.)”

from Slate
__

$1500 an hour for a podunk prosecutor (enforcing those speeding trap tickets). Those union goons have a lot to learn from their small-town equivalents! That ain’t working, that’s the way you do it…

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 07:34:33

How long is the near future?

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 07:38:37

How long will the obama bailouts continue?

Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 08:02:40

Well, he’ll be gone in less than 2½ years. It sounds you’ve put forward yet another doom and gloom prediction with no date attached.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 08:10:19

So you are comfortable buying municipal bonds of Chicago, Cleveland, Philly, Camden, Newark, Buffalo…etc.?

Maybe they will all get bailouts like Detroit just did - except the bond holders were wiped out (the union goons got the bailouts).

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 10:13:50

You referred to every city run by Democrats with unions, which is pretty much every big city in the country.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 10:22:33

Some bounce back and forth.

NYC, San Diego, LA and Indianapolis come to mind

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:07:07

This is probably the most beautiful house in all of Detroit (and still in great condition).

If you built it today - it would cost at least $10 million just for materials and craftmen.

Being located in a long time democrat and public union goon controlled city - it is worth maybe 10% of its replacement cost.

Similar examples can be found in Cleveland, Philadelphia, Buffalo, Trenton, Camden, etc.

Who says housing values always go up?

———————

Beautiful mansion is Detroit’s biggest sale in at least a decade
Yahoo Homes | September 10, 2014 | Ilyce R. Glink

Detroit has recorded its biggest home sale in a long, long time.

The historic and still-beautiful Alfred J. Fisher mansion sold to an anonymous all-cash buyer for $1.6 million, more than any Detroit home in recent memory, according to the Detroit Free Press.

That might not sound like much, but this is a city where thousands of homes have been razed because they couldn’t be sold for anything. Detroit hasn’t seen a sale price like that for at least a decade.

The home has 15 bedrooms, 17 bathrooms, an indoor pool, a ballroom and 2 acres of landscaped grounds in the Palmer Woods neighborhood.

Comment by reedalberger
2014-09-12 06:49:20

They’ll need the other 8.4 million for security.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-09-12 07:58:49

If you built it today - it would cost at least $10 million just for materials and craftmen ???

Well, lets see….16,500 square feet divided into $10,000,000……Thats is $606. per square foot….I can hear the Shrill’s from some distant basement right now….$50. per foot…MAX….Land, Labor, materials, overhead & profit….Why pay 1.6 mil…$96. per square foot…Just have the guy in the basement replace it for you for half that…

 
Comment by Cracker Bob
2014-09-12 09:16:28

I don’t think it is because of which political party is in power. Unfortunately, any town small or big, that has a minority population of >50% has a declining or dead residential downtown. It is a fact no matter where you go in this country.

I am a big fan of small Southern towns. Look at one that has a white majority and people still live right in town in fine old houses. Go another county or two over where there is an urban majority and the old houses are just rotting from neglect. Whatever the cause, white-flight, fear, it is just a fact. And, it is just a shame.

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 09:47:07

I don’t think it is because of which political party is in power.

Union goons are, by far, the largest political donors in history of America elections.

They give nearly ALL their money and support to democrats.

In turn, democrats give the union goons sweetheart pay/benefit/pension contracts.

These contracts have/will bankrupt every major city and state where they infest. Right after they chase out every productive person and businesses with insane taxes, failing schools, crumbling infrastructure, high crime and even more insane regulations.

So now you know.

And it was all for the children…

 
Comment by scdave
2014-09-12 11:19:49

I agree Cracker Bob…

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:20:21

So who are the people blocking amnesty?

It is not obama
It is not the democrat controlled senate
It is not the billionaire liberal elites

Democrats can not imagine these same lawless tactics being used against them some day. And it will and they will have nothing to complain about.

And yes - this speech is now on Drudge. Well worth the read anyways.

————-

Don’t Give the Masters of the Universe Their Amnesty
By Jeff Sessions

Senator Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, delivered a speech on the Senate floor Wednesday evening about Senate Democrats’ refusal to support legislation to block the president’s proposed executive actions on immigration policy, and the interests supporting amnesty. Following is an adapted version of his remarks.

Earlier this week I spoke about the president’s promise that he would issue an executive amnesty to 5 or 6 million people. The planned amnesty would include work permits, photo IDs, and Social Security numbers for millions of people who illegally entered the U.S., illegally overstayed their visas, or defrauded U.S. immigration authorities.

The Senate Democratic conference has supported and enabled the president’s unlawful actions and blocked every effort to stop them. Not even one of our Democratic colleagues has backed the House legislation that would stop this planned executive amnesty or demanded that Senator Reid bring it up for a vote. Every Senate Democrat is therefore the president’s partner in his planned lawless acts.

Tonight I would like to talk about the influence of special interests on our nation’s immigration system. How did we get to the point where elected officials, activist groups, the ACLU, and global CEOs are openly working to deny American workers the immigration protections to which they are legally entitled? How did we get to the point where the Democratic party is prepared to nullify and wipe away the immigration laws of the United States of America?

Just yesterday Majority Leader Reid wrote in a tweet something that was shocking. He said: “Since House Republicans have failed to act on immigration, I know the President will. When he does, I hope he goes Real Big.”

Let this sink in for a moment. The majority leader of the Senate is bragging that he knows the president will circumvent Congress to issue executive amnesty to millions, and he is encouraging the president to ensure this amnesty includes as many people as possible. And the White House has acknowledged that 5 to 6 million is the number they are looking at.

This body is not run by one man. We don’t have a dictator in the great Senate. Every member has a vote. And the only way Senator Reid can succeed in blocking this Senate from voting to stop the president’s executive actions is for members to stop supporting him.

In effect, the entire Senate Democratic conference has surrendered the jobs, wages, and livelihoods of their constituents to a group of special interests meeting in secret at the White House. They are surrendering them to executive actions that will foist on the nation what Congress has refused to pass and the American people have rejected. They are plotting at the White House to move forward with executive action no matter what the people think and no matter what Congress — through the people’s House — has decided.

So who are these so-called expert advocates and business leaders? They are not the law-enforcement officers; they are not our ICE officers; they are not our Border Patrol officers; they are not the American working man and woman; they are not unemployed Americans. They weren’t in the room. You can be sure of that. Their opinions weren’t sought.

No, White House officials are meeting with the world’s most powerful corporate and immigration lobbyists and activists who think border controls are for the little people. The administration is meeting with the elite, the cosmopolitan set, who scorn and mock the concerns of everyday Americans who are concerned about their schools, jobs, wages, communities, and hospitals. These great and powerful citizens of the world don’t care much about old-fashioned things like national boundaries, national sovereignty, and immigration control — let alone the constitutional separation of powers.

Well, don’t you get it? They believe they are always supposed to get whatever it is they want. They are used to that. They spent hundreds of millions of dollars. In fact, one report says they have spent $1.5 billion since 2007 trying to pass their desired immigration bill — $1.5 billion. They tried and tried and tried to pass the bill through Congress, but the American people said: No, no, no. So they decided to just go to the president. They decide to go to President Obama, and they insist that he implement these measures through executive fiat. And Senate Democrats have apparently said: Well, that is just a wonderful idea. We support that. Just do it. Go big. But, Mr. President, wait a little bit. Wait until after the election. We don’t want the voters to hold us accountable for what you are doing. We want to pretend we in the Senate have nothing to do with it.

Well, the “masters of the universe” are very fond of open borders as long as these open borders don’t extend to their gated compounds and fenced-off estates.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 06:38:50

This is one of those rare days in recent times when both gold and U.S. stocks are dropping in tandem. Any thoughts on what’s up?

Comment by azdude
2014-09-12 06:59:01

liquidation?

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 07:02:33

-0.18% for gold. Hardly statically relevant.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 18:06:50

It’s gold and stocks falling in tandem that is unusual (and statistically relevant).

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 18:10:54

You can stick a fork in gold once the Fed starts raising rates.

Commodities
Rising U.S. Dollar Takes Shine Off Gold in Asia
Investors in China, India Cautious About Possible Federal Reserve Move To Raise Interest Rates
By Biman Mukherji
Sept. 12, 2014 6:16 a.m. ET

A strong U.S. dollar is fueling expectations in Asia that already-low gold prices will fall further. Bloomberg News

HONG KONG—A rallying U.S. dollar is fueling expectations in Asia that gold prices, already at their lowest in more than seven months, have further to fall, offsetting the expected rise in demand from year-end festivities in China and Indian weddings.

Gold and the dollar typically move in opposite directions, as rises in the currency prompt investors to shift into higher-yielding assets. By contrast, a falling U.S. dollar or rising geopolitical tensions usually sends investors to the safety of the precious metal.

In recent weeks, both factors have moved against gold, with the dollar rising sharply and investors discounting the likelihood that political tensions in the Middle East and Ukraine will escalate.

Any sharp fall in prices usually brings out bargain hunters betting gold will soon resume its rise. This time, though, investors in China and India, which together account for more than 70% of the global demand for gold, are being cautious. There are concerns the Federal Reserve is moving closer to raising interest rates—a potential boon for the dollar, as it boosts the allure of treasurys.

“The very strong dollar is getting stronger and stock markets are performing very well,” said Wallace Ng, head of precious metals trading at Gerald Metals in Shanghai. “Gold does not look very attractive. We don’t see any investment demand for gold and silver in China.”

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:42:31

Some insight into the mind of the free sh*t army..

“My son works — he’s not entitled to have his own bedroom?” she said. “Next thing they’re going to tell me is that I’m not entitled to a roof over my head.”

She makes $24,000/year but does want to spend $240/month for a great taxpayer subsidized apartment? Because that would be “unfair.” The government should pay for it because she is “entitled.”

The FSA votes. They vote for the party that will give them more free sh*t. And they are above 50% of the population now…

—————————————–

Budget Cuts Reshape New York’s Public Housing
New York Times | September 11, 2014 | MIREYA NAVARRO

The crushing news came less than a year after Diane Robinson and her 24-year-old son moved into an airy two-bedroom apartment in the Bronx. The city, which helps pay her rent, wrote this summer to say she would have to downsize into a one-bedroom apartment or pay $240 more a month in rent.

A public school aide, Ms. Robinson, 48, decided to stay in the apartment, in the Castle Hill neighborhood. But on an annual income of about $25,000, she is struggling, she said, and she does not know how long she can hang on. Moving to a one-bedroom apartment would mean that her son, a college student who works to help with food and utilities, would have to sleep in the living room. “My son works — he’s not entitled to have his own bedroom?” she said. “Next thing they’re going to tell me is that I’m not entitled to a roof over my head.”

Thousands of New York City tenants are facing similar choices because of cuts to the federal Section 8 voucher program and the resulting belt-tightening by the city. The rental vouchers allow low- and moderate-income tenants to live in private buildings and to pay about 30 percent of their income in rent, with the voucher program making up the rest. The cost of the program is about $400 million a year. But federal budget cuts under sequestration last year have left the program $37 million short, the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development said.

Comment by cactus
2014-09-12 13:28:31

“My son works — he’s not entitled to have his own bedroom?” she said. “Next thing they’re going to tell me is that I’m not entitled to a roof over my head.”

yea huh not fair

 
 
Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 06:48:05

Who is worse Big Pharma or the NAR?

I read on zero hedge that 1 in 4 women in their 40s and 50s is on depression meds. 1 in 3 kids in foster care are on psychotropics or add meds.

Big Pharma has created a nation of addicts.

Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 07:06:33

Which antidepressants are addicitve?

Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 08:00:45

Do people stop taking antidepressants? From what I see, once you are on them, you are on them for good.

Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 08:04:39

That’s true a number of drugs, such as those used to control blood pressure. However, that doesn’t constitute addiction.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Shillow
2014-09-12 17:13:09

Yes, there needs to be an effect on mental process for addiction. Antidepressants have that. Mood altering? Check. Need supply to function? Once they’ve got you hooked, Check.

Call it what you will, all those people on anti-depressants is not a good thing.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 17:21:33

Just because a person needs a drug to function doesn’t mean that he’s addicted to it. If wasn’t functioning before he took the drug, the drug is just treating his disease.

 
 
 
 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-09-12 07:58:15

“Who is worse Big Pharma or the NAR?”

From the numbers I hear quoted, it’s hard to say which one siphons more wealth off of the population at large. Real estate probably sucks about 10%-15% of GDP if you include mortgage interest payments. I’ve heard similar numbers for health care in total.

Depends on which of the two scams you fall for, I suppose.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-09-12 08:51:42

Both are very harmful.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:51:19

Just too funny NOT to post.

So gays don’t like their “weddings” mocked? How about that!

Just wait until lots of “fake gay” people get married to avoid taxes..

—————————-

Fury of gay community after two heterosexual men marry in New Zealand.
Daily Mail (Australia/UK) | 12th September 2014 | Heather McNab

Two heterosexual men have tied the knot on Friday morning under New Zealand’s liberal marriage laws.

Marrying not for love, but for Rugby World Cup Tickets, the two men from Dunedin in the South Island of New Zealand officially said ‘I do’ in front of 60 family and friends.

The ceremony was live broadcast by Edge Radio, who’s ‘I Love You, Man’ competition was launched earlier this year in a bid to find two straight men willing to wed for the sought after tickets.

‘It’s official folks, Travis and Matt have just said ‘I do’! Congrats to the happy couple!,’ the station tweeted.

Travis McIntosh, 23, and Matt McCormick, 24, won the ‘bromantic’ radio contest in August and are over the moon- not for a life together, but for the opportunity to head to the Rugby World Cup in England next year.

Local gay rights groups have condemned the wedding, protesting that it ‘trivializes what we’ve fought for,’ according to the New Zealand Herald.

Comment by oxide
2014-09-12 07:19:16

Marrying not for love, but for Rugby World Cup Tickets

In one form or another, this has been going on for thousands of years.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 06:53:06

Got wood?

Got nuclear? (like France)

It is kinda funny to see socialists freeze in the dark due to their insane energy policies…

——————-

Eastern Europe Braces for Energy Shortages as Russian Gas Flows Fall
The Wall Street Journal | Sept. 12, 2014 | Sean Carney

A fall in gas flows from Russia to two Eastern European countries this week has sent a chill through the region as it prepares for possible energy shortages this winter.

Slovakia’s gas distributor SPP said Thursday its daily gas intake from Russia fell 10% below contracted levels starting late Wednesday. Polish gas company PGNiG said its gas flows from Russia had fallen 45% below its contracted daily volumes by Thursday.

Comment by Oddfellow
2014-09-12 08:48:08

It’s funny to see France proven wiser than Germany, which ended its own nuclear energy program, conveniently enabling German ex-chancellors to retire and become CEOs at Russian energy companies.

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 09:50:08

The Germans fully embraced the “green energy” fraud meme.

Windmills and solar power are going to replace coal and nuclear energy…as long as the Russian gas keeps coming.

They will be freezing in the dark this winter.

Maybe it will wake them up.

Comment by Oddfellow
2014-09-12 10:17:14

I think “green energy” was a fig leaf to cover something more nefarious. Just ask ex-German chancellor Schroder, who started the whole thing, and is now a top exec of Russian energy giant Gazprom. Gazprom is anything but green energy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 14:16:26

It’s funny to see France proven wiser than Germany…

until France has its won Fukushima, that is

Comment by Oddfellow
2014-09-12 19:37:46

The Fukushima plant disaster was easily avoidable, if they had taken the most rudimentary safety precautions, google it. And France and Germany have far far lower risks of earthquakes, and even lower risks of tsunamis. That was a fig leaf too.

It’s almost as if top German officials had personal interests in Germany becoming dependent on Russian energy, but I can’t imagine why. Did I mention that the German Chancellor who initiated their cessation of nuclear power went on to a top job at Russian energy giant Gazprom? Specifically at the company that built a giant pipeline to supply Germany with natural gas. What’s that German word for amazing coincidence?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-09-12 10:07:46

“Got wood?”

You certainly seem to, today…

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 06:58:00

Latest News
Dow 17,002 -46.92 -0.28%
Nasdaq 4,581 -10.66 -0.23%
S&P 500 1,991 -6.06 -0.30%
9:10 A.M. ET Updated Gold slips for 5th straight day, eyes weekly loss of 2.5%

The Wall Street Journal
5 takeaways from the Bank of England’s bitcoin report
Published: Sept 11, 2014 9:48 a.m. ET
By Amir Mizroch
Bloomberg
Bitcoin may be a bank killer, the Bank of England says.

The Bank of England released a report Thursday on innovations in payment technologies and the emergence of digital currencies, specifically bitcoin. It’s bottom line: The digital currency doesn’t yet pose a threat to the U.K. financial system.

#1: It’s A Bank Killer

The BOE said the key innovation of digital currencies is the ‘distributed ledger’ technology that allows a payment system to operate in an entirely decentralized way, with no intermediaries such as banks.

#2: It’s Not For Everyone, Yet

While digital currencies could, in theory, serve as money for anybody with an internet-enabled device, at present they serve the roles of money only to a limited extent and only for relatively few people.

#3: Never Have So Few..

The BOE estimates that as few as 20,000 people in the United Kingdom currently hold any bitcoins, and that as few as 300 transactions may be conducted by those people per day.

#4: Owed So Little

The bank estimates that there is less than £60 million ($98 million) worth of bitcoins circulating within the U.K. economy, which represents less than 0.1% of sterling notes and coin and only 0.003% of broad money balances.

#5: Transaction Fees Will Rise

A key attraction of digital currencies like bitcoin is their low transaction fees. But as usage grows, and bitcoin’s set supply diminishes, these fees may eventually need to rise significantly.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-09-12 10:01:23

#2: It’s Not For Everyone, Yet

It will never be for everyone. The average Joe won’t be able to keep his digital wallet secure and will get hacked and lose all his money.

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 07:08:28

Another reason Main Street shouldn’t trust Wall Street
By Allan Sloan September 11 at 8:35 PM

Whenever Wall Street comes up with a hot new product, Main Street gets stuck with a bill. That happened with the dot-com mania that inflated and then destroyed stock prices, and with the junk mortgages that inflated and then helped tank the economy. And it’s starting to happen with Wall Street’s newest favorite product: corporate inversions.

“Inversion,” of course, is a euphemism for “desertion.” It happens when a U.S. corporation takes over a foreign company and then — for tax purposes only — pretends to be based in the taken-over company’s country. That allows the U.S. company to pay lower income tax rates — such as 12.5 percent (or even less) in Ireland rather than 35 percent in the United States.

Inverters and would-be inverters say their U.S. tax rate will remain the same, which is true. What they don’t say is that inversion makes their taxable U.S. income lower than it would otherwise be. Inverted companies reduce their federal and state income tax bills by siphoning income out of the United States in a variety of ways, but they continue to be run from here and benefit from what our country has to offer: deep and liquid financial markets, rule of law, intellectual infrastructure, great places to live, and military protection.

That behavior’s repellent, at least to me.

But let’s not get into questions of morality and social responsibility today, or whether proposals by the Treasury or Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) to rein in inversions will work. Instead, let me show you how regular people — especially prudent, long-term retail investors — pick up the tab for Wall Street’s inversion feast.

Advertisement

Wall Street firms get rich advisory fees and financing fees from inversions. Hedge funds, takeover trolls (who call themselves “activist investors”) and other institutional investors — all part of Wall Street — can get a quick boost to their investment performance, which helps them generate bigger fees and attract more investor money.

Board members and top executives of corporations that succumb to inversion mania get rich subsidies from the firms’ shareholders, who typically give them special payments to cover the excise taxes they owe on their restricted shares and options when the inversion happens. For example, Medtronic, a big medical-device company that wants to invert, estimates that it will give $63 million of nondeductible payments to its top executives and directors to cover their excise taxes and the taxes they will owe on their excise tax subsidy.

Meanwhile, retail investors who hold Medtronic in non-retirement accounts will pay taxes on shares they own directly, and will pay taxes indirectly on shares owned by mutual funds they hold.

Here’s why. Although a company pays no exit tax when it moves its tax domicile, tax law requires shareholders to pay capital gains tax as if the company were sold for cash at its market price on Inversion Day. (This is an anti-inversion regulation that hasn’t worked at all.) The holders continue to own their Medtronic shares but have to dig into their own pockets to pay the tax.

That can be serious money. For example, a high-bracket Minnesota resident who has owned shares of Minneapolis-based Medtronic for 20 years, when it sold for the equivalent of $5 a share, would have to pay about $20 a share in federal and state tax if the company inverts at $65, the price Medtronic assumed in a recent SEC filing. But such taxes don’t affect mutual fund and hedge fund managers, who are judged on pre-tax performance and who pass on tax obligations to their investors.

“It’s one thing for investors to have to pay tax if a fund manager is selling a stock at a profit, but it’s a whole other thing to have to pay on a stock the fund is keeping,” said Daniel P. Wiener, editor of a newsletter for Vanguard investors. The same, of course, is true for people who own stock directly.

Once again, Wall Street gets its way, while responsible Main Street folks get screwed. Let’s stop this inversion farce now, fix the corporate tax code, and get back to the business of growing our economy and improving our lives. 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/another-reason-main-street-shouldnt-trust-wall-street/2014/09/11/7e48d62e-39fb-11e4-8601-97ba88884ffd_story.html

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 07:46:02

1. Why doesn’t obama and the dems (while they were passing obamacare) reduce the HIGHEST corporate tax rate in the industrialized (USA!) world instead of punishing people and corporations?

2. When obama bailed out Chrysler (at a cost of billions of taxpayer dollars as a payback to the UAW) he allowed them to “merge” with FIAT. And now they have one of the BIGGEST “inversions” going on too.

Do you find that behavior’s repellent???

Comment by aNYCdj
2014-09-12 17:03:53

If we had NO corporate income there would be no tax breaks or TAX refunds because you didn’t pay any in the first place……….it will put lots of tax lawyers and accountants out of business……kooool!

 
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-09-12 07:32:23

Bang a bong bong… “Cash is king!” Rub-A-Dub-Dub…”Cash is King!” A Selfish hoarder sleeps easy! Bing a Bang bang!

A great day to laugh at Home moaners!

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-09-12 07:45:10

Oh my gosh, I’m getting ready to load up on precious metals too. I hope the price of gold goes below $1200 in October.

When interest rates rocket up (and they will), Treasuries will be a hot potato and so will stocks. Investors will be rushing to alternative assets and it will be both cash and precious metals.

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 07:49:12

When bonds pay a significant interest rate - people rush OUT of gold into bonds.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-09-12 09:07:40

You did not learn your history lesson. Look at the late 70s. People sold bonds like crazy. They sold stocks like crazy. They loaded up on gold.

Best thing to do is load up on precious metals while rates are low. Stop buying the precious when rates zoom up. Hold onto them. Then slowly sell off some and use the proceeds to buy long bonds.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-09-12 09:09:47

actually thinking about what you said again, you are right. We both say the same thing. Rates are zero now so that’s when the smart money buys up commodities.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-09-12 08:53:58

$20k short of $1 million in loose cash. Bonus check arrived yesterday. ;)

Comment by azdude
2014-09-12 09:07:51

do your food stamps get u through a month?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-09-12 10:16:55

You’re enraged AZ._Fraud.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-09-12 07:50:12

“It’s the land!”

Nope.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 09:58:16

If you like your machetes, you can keep your machetes…

Especially in a Sanctuary City!

————————–

Unprovoked Machete Attack By Illegal Aliens Caught On Camera In Chicago
American Thinker | September 12, 2014 | Thomas Lifson

A horrific machete attack by an illegal alien gang on two innocent young men waiting on a platform for a Chicago El train has been caught on surveillance camera, and is making big news in Chicago. Chicago is, of course, a sanctuary city for illegal aliens under the policies of Democratic Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Here is the ABC/channel 7 news report on the incident, which pauses the video to spare viewers the full horror

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 10:17:26

America - land of the free sh*t army

———————

America, 2014: The Land of Entitlements
American Thinker | 12 September 2014 | David Long

Earlier this week I had lunch with a CPA client of mine to talk with him about increasing the number of his small business clients who provide medical insurance plans to their employees. Everything I recount herein is from him; I am not making this up.

His answer and the reasoning behind his answer were stunning to me. In my naivety, I hadn’t even dreamed that I would hear anything like what he was about to tell me.

He explained that essentially, his clientele comprises Spanish-speaking business owners, almost all of whom employ essentially 100% Spanish speaking workers. They own firms such as restaurants, gardening services, custodial services, small grocery stores, painting companies, trucking companies, and so on. But, he said, most of their employees who work only 20 to 30 hours a week, with only a very few who work the full traditional “full time” 40 hours a week. As a result, my CPA client said, nearly all of his clients, the business owners, don’t feel an obligation to provide benefits to these “part-time” employees.

When I asked why they had mostly part-timers instead of full-time workers, he explained that the employees don’t want to earn too much money, or else they’ll lose their government benefits.

They like getting free things like food stamps, a housing allowance, MediCal insurance (California’s government subsidize medical care for low income people), and the like. They would rather earn less and get the entitlement programs for free than work longer hours, make more money, and have to pay for their own food, housing, insurance, and so on.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2014-09-12 10:49:20

I’ve got to back you up on this one.

Just came back from a visit with my Border Patrol agent brother. Some of the things he’s observed…….

-When he got married, the wife had a tough time finding a job, because she’s can’t speak Spanish.

-It has reached the point where there are enough Hispanics in the country that they don’t have the need/desire to assimilate.

-Almost all of the agents he knows are trying to get out of California. Because, “…….what’s the point of tearing up our bodies chasing illegals over these hills, when they are just cutting them loose, even if we catch them?”.

- “Mexicans are nothing, if not practical…….. this “pulling yourself up by the bootstraps” stuff for self respect doesn’t exist in their world. Their view is: If the government is giving away money/free s##t, you are an idiot for not taking as much as you can get”.

-There is a giant underground (and non-tax paying) economy based on food trucks and swap meets.

-There is some pretty high levels of anger and frustration among the W-2/middle class members about all of the college subsidies that immigrants (legal and non-legal) are getting for their kids, that aren’t available to they typical middle class J6P.. especially when this FS is going to a “low income” (on paper) immigrant, who is making big bucks under the table.

 
Comment by Dguy
2014-09-12 11:03:58

2B, why are you always so worked up about government benefits for poor people? Is it OK for the government to give billions of dollars of tax breaks to oil companies while they make record profits? Because I never hear you complain about that. Or are handouts only acceptable when they go to rich white guys in suits?

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 11:51:59

I complain about it all the time.

Beginning with TARP. And the Freddie and Fannie bail-outs. Etc.

Tax breaks to oil companies? Name them with sources.
Depreciating equipment is a tax break.
Providing medical insurance to your employees is a tax break.
Providing a 401k is a tax break.
Building a transfer station where a state builds some infrastructure is a tax break.
Do you agree with those tax breaks?

It all boils down to the FSA votes. And they vote democrat.

And THAT is all the liberals/progressives on this board care about.

Not insane housing prices
Not insane federal, state and local debt
Not cultural suicide
Not a lawless president who makes up laws as he goes and refuses to enforce laws he does not like.

I have said it before:

A conservative will be more than happy to live under the same laws he wants for everyone else.

A liberal/progressive expects to exempted from all the laws and taxes they want for everyone else.

Comment by Dguy
2014-09-12 12:42:57

All I can say is, Obama wouldn’t be president now if the conservatives who were in office before him weren’t a bunch of total screw-ups. Cutting taxes for the rich to reduce the deficit, attacking Iraq to get Bin Laden, passing out no-bid contracts to Dick Cheney’s friends so we can practice free enterprise, these are all conservative policies this country had to live with for 8 years. Thank God we have someone in office now who actually thinks before he acts, and not the tweedle-dum and tweedle-dick we had before.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-09-12 14:32:37

‘Thank God we have someone in office now who actually thinks before he acts’

News Organizations Finally Realize Obama’s War Plan Is a Hot Mess

 
 
Comment by Dguy
2014-09-12 12:57:41

We had 8 years of conservative policies, and they almost destroyed our economy. Obama wouldn’t be president now if people really wanted to go back to that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 13:12:13

The free sh*t army votes.

And they make up more than 50% of the population…

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-09-12 19:54:03

“We had 8 years of conservative policies, and they almost destroyed our economy. Obama wouldn’t be president now if people really wanted to go back to that.”

Flashback: Obama in 2008: Adding $4 Trillion to National Debt ‘Unpatriotic’

By Matt Cover

as a presidential candidate in 2008 Obama criticized then-President George W. Bush for adding $4 trillion to the national debt, saying it was “unpatriotic” and also “irresponsible” to saddle future generations with such a large national debt.

“The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion dollars for the first 42 presidents — number 43 added $4 trillion dollars by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child,” Obama said on July 3, 2008, at a campaign event in Fargo, N.D.

“That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic,” said candidate Obama.

Jan 11, 2014 … In fact, by Friday, the U.S. debt had rocketed past $17 trillion. … At $17 trillion, this number has passed total U.S. gross domestic product (GDP),

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ - 105k -

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-09-12 13:32:04

2B, why are you always so worked up about government benefits for poor people? Is it OK for the government to give billions of dollars of tax breaks to oil companies while they make record profits? Because I never hear you complain about that. Or are handouts only acceptable when they go to rich white guys in suits?

There is psychological research that explains that attitude.

Just-world hypothesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person’s actions always bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, so that all noble actions are eventually rewarded and all evil actions are eventually punished. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of—a universal force that restores moral balance. The fallacy is that this implies (often unintentionally) the existence of cosmic justice, destiny, divine providence, desert, stability, or order, and may also serve to rationalize people’s misfortune on the grounds that they deserve it.
The hypothesis popularly appears in the English language in various figures of speech that imply guaranteed negative reprisal, such as: “You got what was coming to you”, “What goes around comes around”, and “You reap what you sow”. This hypothesis has been widely studied by social psychologists since Melvin J. Lerner conducted seminal work on the belief in a just world in the early 1960s.[1] Research has continued since then, examining the predictive capacity of the hypothesis in various situations and across cultures, and clarifying and expanding the theoretical understandings of just-world beliefs.[2]

Melvin Lerner

Lerner was prompted to study justice beliefs and the just-world hypothesis in the context of social psychological inquiry into negative social and societal interactions.[3] Lerner saw his work as extending Stanley Milgram’s work on obedience. He sought to answer the questions of how regimes that cause cruelty and suffering maintain popular support, and how people come to accept social norms and laws that produce misery and suffering.[4]
Lerner’s inquiry was influenced by repeatedly witnessing the tendency of observers to blame victims for their suffering. During his clinical training as a psychologist, he observed treatment of mentally ill persons by the health care practitioners with whom he worked. Though he knew them to be kindhearted, educated people, they often blamed patients for the patients’ own suffering.[5] Lerner also describes his surprise at hearing his students derogate the poor, seemingly oblivious to the structural forces that contribute to poverty.[3] In a study on rewards, he observed that when one of two men was chosen at random to receive a reward for a task, that caused him to be more favorably evaluated by observers, even when the observers had been informed that the recipient of the reward was chosen at random.[6][7] Existing social psychological theories, including cognitive dissonance, could not fully explain these phenomena.[7] The desire to understand the processes that caused these phenomena led Lerner to conduct his first experiments on what is now called the just-world hypothesis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis

 
 
 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2014-09-12 10:23:41

From the personal “Chickens coming home to roost” department….

As some may have noted, my appearances here have become less frequent. Simple reason……too busy.

Ran into an acquaintance of mine on Monday, who told me about a project I might be interested in. Seems that an Ivy-League type bought an old airplane/business jet, took it to a local shop to do the 3-year inspection, and now those guys are in over their heads. The one guy in the shop who had any experience just left for a new job in SoCal. Nobody else knows anything, not even the kind of inspections they are supposed to be doing. The shop manager is thinking about just putting it back together, and telling the owner to try to find someone who will work on it. (and taking a $10K hit in the shops budget).

Hell, even the aircraft OEM can’t/won’t help them. Even if they were interested in doing an inspection on a thirty year old airplane, all of the guys who have actually worked on this model are either retired, bought out, and/or have moved on to bigger better things.

As it turns out, yours truly is the answer to everyone’s problems, and I could pick up an easy ten grand for about two weeks of supervisory work.

But I ain’t touching it. The guy doesn’t have enough money to pay me to make it worth my while, or for me to assume the risk of approving his airplane for “Return to Service”.

Risking my regular job, and my continuing contract work on professionally flown and operated, adequately budgeted corporate jets just isn’t worth the risk of doing a one time deal for some guy who couldn’t figure out (in spite of his Ivy League degree) that the airplane he just bought was super-cheap for a reason.

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 10:39:53

“Experience keeps a dear school, but fools will learn in no other.”
– Ben Franklin

Comment by X-GSfixr
2014-09-12 11:22:21

Airplane had had mods done to it that the OEM doesn’t approve/recognize. They won’t touch it, even if they still had guys in the shop with experience working them (which they don’t……the current staff think a 1990 airplane is “old”).

They even say that the inspections/manuals don’t apply to it, “because it isn’t a ###### anymore”. The guys that sell these mods usually can’t be bothered with developing approved inspections, because they have your money already, and/or they don’t have the engineering team to develop them.

With some effort, we could generate an inspection package that would pass muster with the FAA. But why waste my time?

Add to that the type of “operator” he is (to paraphrase Ron White, a guy flying to the scene of the crash)

A situation similar to CRT displays. Nobody has the expertise, or makes the parts to fix them anymore. Worth more as used parts than a flying airplane.

Even Boeings and Airbus airliners are in this scenario. The airlines lease them, then get rid of them as soon as a major inspection comes due. Then the leasing companies have the inspections done in low cost shops overseas, then lease them out again. Because of treaties, an airline can/has to accept a major inspection sign off done in BFE.

There is a big fight going on right with the FAA now between the mechanics unions and the US based maintenance shops, and the airlines. Most overseas shops don’t have mandatory alcohol and drug testing, like they do here in the USA. The overseas shops are flying the “sovereignty/you can’t apply US regs here” flag, while at the same time saying that aviation treaties require that a signoff of a major inspection in BFE is the same as one done in a Part 145 USA based shop.

The airlines management is siding with the foreign shops, because they save money (read as get bigger paychecks, stock options and bonuses).

Of course, you can fix the problem by getting rid of mandatory testing for all “public safety” workers in the US.

Comment by 2banana
2014-09-12 11:59:44

It would be interesting if:

Airplanes would have to post (on the plane and online) where they have been inspected/maintained.

One lawsuit from a preventable accident would wipe out all the profits from using a substandard foreign maintenance shop.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Puggs
2014-09-12 13:38:01

just ONE MORE reason why I love driving whenever possible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2014-09-12 21:00:25

‘The airlines management is siding with the foreign shops, because they save money (read as get bigger paychecks, stock options and bonuses).’

I remember back in the 1980’s the whole outsourcing of plane maintenance taking place. It did not register with me as the future as I thought it was bizarre to fly a plane hundreds or even thousand of miles from the airline’s hub to get inspection and repairs done. I mean, why risk the extra distance if you could have mechanics on home-base site to do the work? After a while, I heard about planes being flown to South America for work? Does that sound about right X-GSfixr?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Puggs
2014-09-12 13:40:33

1st rule of investing. Know what you’re getting into.

Comment by azdude
2014-09-12 15:17:26

make sure you use other peoples money so when there is a crash u dont lose.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-09-12 19:10:49

C R A T E R

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by goon squad
2014-09-12 16:11:27

The best song the Kinks ever recorded:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_M0jDbmPTc

Comment by phony scandals
2014-09-12 20:07:39

Name that tune

“Hey, what’s the matter man?
We’re gonna come around at twelve
With some Puerto Rican girls that are just dyin’ to meet you.
We’re gonna bring a case of wine
Hey, let’s go mess and fool around
You know, like we used to”

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-09-12 20:23:55

Miss You

Comment by phony scandals
2014-09-13 06:32:28

We have a winner!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 18:12:39

If only everyone were wealthy, we could all own $500K starter homes or even $1 million dollar SFRs in SF.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-09-12 18:14:18

Heard on the Street
Why Bullish Renters Still Aren’t Buying
Fed Survey Highlights Disconnect Between Ambition to Buy and Ability to Do So
By John Carney
Sept. 12, 2014 1:50 p.m. ET

The American dream of owning a home is still alive and well among Americans who rent. Unfortunately, that isn’t likely to become a reality for many of them anytime soon.

The reason doesn’t have to do with a turn against homeownership or a belief in the wake of the financial crisis that buying a home is a bad investment. A recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York showed that a survey of renters found 60% thought buying property in their ZIP Code is a good investment, compared with just 12% who rate it a bad one.

Although many would like to buy a home, the level of those who actually expect to buy is far lower. The average renter, the survey found, believes he or she has a 63% chance of moving in the next three years but only a 44% chance of buying when moving.

Why the disconnect? In a word: fundamentals.

A majority of renters believe their balance sheets are weak because of low levels of savings or high levels of debt. Fifty-three percent think their income is too low and 41% say their credit isn’t good enough. About two-thirds believe it would be difficult to get a mortgage.

This suggests that without a significantly stronger economy or easier credit standards, the pace of renters flowing into home buying is unlikely to pick up.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-09-12 20:10:43

Region IV checking in

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post