October 11, 2014

Bits Bucket for October 11, 2014

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

162 Comments »

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 01:08:24

Did you strike out this week in the stock market?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 01:11:21

The Buzz
Stocks should fall more. You shouldn’t worry
By Paul R. La Monica @lamonicabuzz
October 10, 2014: 4:40 PM ET
The market suffers from whiplash

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
It looks like the streak of big gains for stocks following huge losses is over.

The broader market was down again Friday. The Dow suffered another triple-digit loss, dropping 115 points. The S&P 500 fell more than 1%.

And tech stocks really took it in the chin. The Nasdaq also dropped more than 100 points, a decline of more than 2%. Intel (INTC, Tech30), Facebook (FB, Tech30), Cisco (CSCO, Tech30), Microsoft (MSFT, Tech30) and many other stocks in CNNMoney’s Tech 30 index fell sharply.

It’s been a rough start to October. Volatility is back with a vengeance and white-knuckled investors are worried that the recent sell-off is going to get worse. CNNMoney’s Fear & Greed Index hit 1 on Friday. It can’t go lower than 0.

But do you know what? Stocks probably should fall further in the short-term.

Let’s put things in perspective. The Dow is only 4% below its all-time high from September 19. The S&P 500 is about 5% below its record high — also set that day.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 07:37:55

‘The Dow is only 4% below its all-time high from September 19. The S&P 500 is about 5% below its record high — also set that day’

What’s interesting to me is the failure to put prices in perspective. Stock soar for years when wages haven’t. Same for New Zealand dairy farms, houses in most of the world, old cars, paintings, shoot, the list is almost endless. Now what happened at the same time? Central banks printed up around $30 trillion. Coincidence?

We do know wealth can’t be printed. Sure, it can drive up stock prices, and it’s regularly reported that it has. But it’s an illusion really. An illusion people believe in. Watch the gnashing of teeth though, when artificially pumped up prices teeter. “Is it going to fall? Oh no!” With no connection made to the counterfeiting that made it go up in the first place.

Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 07:43:49

Central banks printed up around $30 trillion. Coincidence ??

Cause & Effect….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 08:00:34

My sense is that the Fed is in a position where they can’t unwind their “extraordinary stimulus measures” used to battle the Great Recession without seriously roiling markets. However it is increasingly obvious the banking system doesn’t work very well near the zero bound.

Hence they are gradually weening the economy off QE3, reintroducing market volatility in the process. Hold on to your hats, folks!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 08:10:34

Hold on to your hats, folks! ??

If any number of things break the wrong way its more like buckle-up and hold on to your azz….

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-10-11 08:37:06

I’ll strap my hat to my ass so I can hold onto both.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 08:54:31

You will crap in your Hat if you do that… :>)

 
Comment by Shillow
2014-10-11 10:43:18

My sense is that the Fed is in a position where they can’t unwind their “extraordinary stimulus measures” used to battle the Great Recession without seriously roiling markets.

When you go off steroids you deflate. It is that simple.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 11:25:47

When you go off Prozac, you get depressed.

 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 08:11:54

“Wealth can’t be printed.”

That is the bottom line.

i value the USD in the intermediate term but expect its value to erode a little bit relative to gold in the next five years and erode a lot relative to gold after that. However I expect the USD to be very strong relative to real estate the next five years. And maybe relative to stocks the next five years.

I need to have plenty of cash for a variety of reasons: my age, my car’s age, my career change of last year, but it is equally important to stack bullion.

For me, paper money is a safe store of wealth for my five year goals. Stacking precious metals takes care of the ten or twenty years beyond. Stocks are for twenty years or more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:18:38

Not to disagree with any of your points, but it is interesting to me how you think gold is somehow special compared to real estate or stocks. Didn’t you notice how its value went up by a factor of four since 2000? I guess the question gets down to whether that price increase is more sustainable than similar ones that have played out for stocks, housing, commodities, New Zealand farmland, Kansas farmland, etc etc etc.

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 12:08:29

Or a factor of 1.5 since 1980?

Real estate in form of SFH:
For the average person, if. You want your house value to keep up with inflation you have to time it it takes years to get to perfect timing. 1997 was the last good year to buy a house.

You also depend on the decency of your neighbors to keep the value of your neighborhood up.

You are a sitting duck for the statists to roll in, and increase your property taxes and utility taxes.

Precious metals bullion:

You can take with with you to another state. I have done so.

You can dollar cost average into them. A tenth ounce gold eagle is somewhere under $150, including premium. Buying that once a month is affordable for many people. That is probably dollar value averaging since you buy units worth, not dollars worth in such a small amount.

I repeat that neither physical precious metals nor primary residence is an investment.

Personally I only invest in stocks and wines.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 20:15:46

Business » Industry
MUMBAI, October 11, 2014
Updated: October 11, 2014 23:20 IST
Expectation of price fall triggers drop in gold demand
Ramnath Subbu
The demand for the metal seems to have been impacted by a strong U.S. dollar and its negative impact on gold prices.

The festival season is at the door, and yet for the most cherished commodity for Indians, gold, the demand — which normally spikes in this period — has been only tepid. This is reflected in the price of the yellow metal, which fell to a 15-month low at Rs.26,560 per 10 gram last week before some recovery. Gold closed the week at Rs.27,180 in
Mumbai.

The demand for the metal seems to have been impacted by a strong U.S. dollar and its negative impact on gold prices. Besides, the expectations of the U.S. Federal Reserve hiking interest rates have dented gold’s appeal.

In India, the lack of a clear price direction and the expectation of lower prices have been key drivers in deterring purchases among physical buyers and a similar mentality has prevailed in the investor demand. “We have been seeing a build up of short sellers and outflows from exchange traded funds (ETFs) continue,” Fund Manager at Quantum AMC Chirag Mehta said. “In India, physical buyers have been waiting for gold to come down to Rs.25,000 levels to enter the market,” said Nitin Nachnani, Commodities analyst at Geojit BNP Paribas. “However, in the domestic market, technically there is a strong support at Rs.26,200 levels and Rs.25,000 levels are unlikely to be seen in the current calendar.”

Alternative investments such as equities have rallied by more than 30-35 per cent in the last year, and the quarter results are expected to start trickling in. “However, stock prices seem to have discounted the good results and factored them in, and it would have to be something exceptional to trigger renewed interest. Besides, in the last few weeks, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have been huge sellers in the economy, and this has not be positive for equities,” Mr. Nachnani said.

Indian gold price has fallen 20 per cent in the last two years from the peaks, and analysts feel, at current levels, it does offer a ‘fair’ value. “There is apprehension as to whether gold prices have bottomed out. At around $1,200-mark, one should slowly start seeing smart money move to gold despite the negative momentum. This is because the prices are closer to the all in cost of producing an ounce of gold, which was around $1,200 per ounce levels,” Mr. Mehta said. Internationally, gold has recovered well from $1,180 (a strong support level) to $1,230 per ounce, which is indicative of a strong move, analysts feel.

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2014-10-11 21:17:25

‘Precious metals bullion:

You can take with with you to another state. I have done so.

You can dollar cost average into them. A tenth ounce gold eagle is somewhere under $150, including premium. Buying that once a month is affordable for many people. That is probably dollar value averaging since you buy units worth, not dollars worth in such a small amount.’

Bill, a key thing is that physical precious metals are fungible and have no annual expenses of account maintenance,fees, etc. Buy it and store it safely. Pass it on to heirs with instructions to liquidate only when the SHTF and gold is in demand for barter.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 22:27:45

“Pass it on to heirs with instructions to liquidate only when the SHTF and gold is in demand for barter.”

Has that ever happened before over the entire course of U.S. history?

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2014-10-12 18:31:44

‘ “Pass it on to heirs with instructions to liquidate only when the SHTF and gold is in demand for barter.”

Has that ever happened before over the entire course of U.S. history? ‘

Exactly. The gold hoarding keeps the S from HTF. A system of checks and balances. Same with guns. Take them away and see what happens ~/s

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-10-11 10:01:22

“wealth can’t be printed…”

The Fed didn’t just give this money away, they loaned it out for the most part. When this snaps back it is going to leave a mark that I cannot imagine more loans covering up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:24:36

“…they loaned it out for the most part.”

And some borrowers got alot better terms than others — ALOT!

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:28:23

Bernanke Says AIG Bailout Loan Called for Sterner Terms
By Andrew Zajac and Christie Smythe
Oct 9, 2014 5:38 PM PT

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke defended the sterner treatment of American International Group Inc. (AIG) in the 2008 bailout compared with how investment banks were handled, saying the rescue of the insurer had a different purpose.

Maurice “Hank” Greenberg’s Starr International Co. claims in a lawsuit that the government illegally took equity in AIG and that a 14 percent interest rate on the rescue loan was extortionate. Starr is seeking at least $25 billion in damages.

An $85 billion loan to AIG at a steep interest rate “was intended to prevent the collapse of a systemic firm” while keeping its shareholders from reaping a windfall, Bernanke testified today in Washington federal court.

Low-interest lending to banks and other institutions was meant to “get funds out into the system” to improve liquidity, even though it was understood that the action might lead to a windfall for their shareholders, Bernanke testified.

“There were offsetting considerations,” Bernanke told the court under questioning by David Boies, an attorney for Starr.

Earlier testimony and documents in the trial, which began Sept. 29, showed that banks paid less than 4 percent interest on their loans from the Fed.

‘Crazily High’

Bernanke testified that at the time of the bailout, he didn’t know the basis for what a New York Fed official called a “crazily high” interest rate the government charged the insurer.

“I have since learned something about it, but at the time I didn’t know,” Bernanke said. “I understand the overall goal was to minimize the windfall to the stockholders of AIG from being bailed out, but I couldn’t go term by term and explain them.”

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:15:46

“Stock soar for years when wages haven’t. Same for New Zealand dairy farms, houses in most of the world, old cars, paintings, shoot, the list is almost endless. Now what happened at the same time? Central banks printed up around $30 trillion. Coincidence?”

This would make a great topic for some economics grad student’s dissertation. Perhaps he could even carry out the work under the advisement of Dr. Edward Quince.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2014-10-11 15:38:56

I have no opinion.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 20:10:12

“Every time that the Fed has ended QE, rates have gone down, and stock prices have gone down.”

Sure makes you wonder whether there might be a link.

What’s next for funds when Fed stops buying bonds?

October 09, 2014 12:25 pm • By STAN CHOE

NEW YORK (AP) — In less than three weeks, a big change is nearly certain for investors. Few will be surprised, but some will be nervous.

On Oct. 29, virtually all economists expect the Federal Reserve to announce the end of its program that bought bonds every month in order to boost the job market. The purchases are widely credited for fueling price increases of all kinds of investments.

Investors have had a lot of advance notice that the end is coming, and the hope is that the announcement won’t cause big markets swings given all the time they’ve had to prepare. Many mutual fund managers say their bigger concern is when the Fed will start raising short-term interest rates, which the central bank has said won’t be for a “considerable time.” Rising interest rates would knock down prices for bonds, and it could also sap demand for stocks. Most managers expect the first rate hike to happen next year and for it to have a bigger impact than the end of bond buying, which is also known as quantitative easing or QE.

But some fund managers say this time may not be different from past instances that QE has ended, and they’re preparing to see jolts in both the stock and bond markets. That’s what happened in 2010 and 2011.

Every time that the Fed has ended QE, rates have gone down, and stock prices have gone down,” says Jim Keegan, portfolio manager of the $1.1 billion RidgeWorth Total Return Bond fund (CBPSX). “That seems to be holding true again.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 22:33:11

“On Oct. 29, virtually all economists expect the Federal Reserve to announce the end of its program that bought bonds every month in order to boost the job market. The purchases are widely credited for fueling price increases of all kinds of investments.”

They sure know how to pick an auspicious date over at the Fed.

The crash Oct. 29, 1929
Nearly 5,000 people wait outside the State Labor Bureau in New York City on Nov. 24, 1933. The country’s unemployment rate topped 25 percent that year. (Associated Press)
By Paul Farhi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 29, 2008

The bread lines didn’t form overnight. The banks didn’t buckle all at once. And no one, despite urban legend, is known to have jumped out of a window in sorrow over financial ruin.

Instead, the worst would come later, sometimes months and even years after Oct. 29, 1929, “Black Tuesday.” On that date — 79 years ago today — few people could conceive that an economic apocalypse was gathering, even as the ominous news soaked in. But the ripples would soon begin.

In 24 hours of trading, starting Oct. 28 and continuing into the next day, some 25 percent of the value of America’s biggest companies vanished on the New York Stock Exchange. Coming on the heels of big losses a few days earlier, the reversal was stunning. Just six weeks before, stocks had reached their all-time high.

Still, it was possible at first to view the Crash of ‘29 as an isolated event. Most people hadn’t shared in the rising prosperity after World War I, so most didn’t lose money in the Crash. Only about 2 percent of households owned stocks, says historian David E. Kyvig, compared with about 50 percent who have direct or indirect investments in the market today.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Shillow
2014-10-11 07:59:25

Did you strike out this week in the stock market?

Did you strike out this whole year, so far?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 08:04:48

Kind of goes hand in hand. In retrospect, it was a shoeshine boy moment when Pimco started talking about diversifying from bonds into stocks.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:26:27

Gross bailing on Pimco is the best barometer of where interest rates are going. For him his legacy is the first priority. And when typically lending rates are up to 10-12%, and you will, you’re going to see deluded fools in a panic.

Central banking is a fraud. And nobody does it like the fed. Nobody.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 11:00:15

Credit Markets
U.S. Government Bonds Book Fourth Straight Weekly Gain
Global Stock Selloff Adds to Rally
By Cynthia Lin
Updated Oct. 10, 2014 4:28 p.m. ET

U.S. Treasury prices rose Friday as selling pressure hit global stock markets, leading the 10-year yield to its longest streak of weekly declines since January.

In late afternoon trading, benchmark 10-year notes gained 6/32 in price to yield 2.305%. The yield fell from 2.45% at the start of the week, marking a fourth straight weekly decline—the longest since the turn of the year.

The 30-year bond rallied 20/32 to yield 3.031%. Bond yields decline when prices rise. The bond market is closed Monday in observance of Columbus Day.

Friday’s gains came as global stocks sold off on worries about economic growth. That added to the rally in bonds since the start of October, with the Treasurys market already handing owners 0.95% in total return this month as of Thursday’s close.

Despite U.S. economic data showing improvement, deflationary pressures plaguing the eurozone, disappointing data out of Germany and a plethora of geopolitical risks around the world have kept buyers around in the haven bond market.

“The global slowdown in Asia and especially Europe has been an enormous story this week,” said Tom di Galoma, head of rates and credit trading at ED&F Capital Markets. “It’s foreign money fleeing Europe which is driving the Treasury bid.”

Indeed, with shorter-dated German debt offering owners negative rates and its 10-year bund yielding 0.89%, even historically low yields on U.S. Treasurys look relatively appealing.

A research note by Bank of America Merrill Lynch out Friday found that €1.3 trillion of eurozone government debt trade at a negative yield, representing about 30% of the market. This could mean as much as €1 trillion is looking for better-yielding investments, the firm estimates.

Still, considering the magnitude of the selloff in global stocks, bond traders say the lift that has provided Treasurys has been limited.

Bonds face uncertainties of their own—namely when the Federal Reserve will become confident enough about the U.S. economy to tighten policy.

Unless we go into a deflation spiral, I don’t see yields going much lower,” said Gary Pollack, head of fixed-income trading at Deutsche Bank’s private wealth-management unit, pointing to widespread expectations that the Fed will begin raising rates in the middle of 2015.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 11:03:29

Markets
Pimco Total Return Cut U.S. Government-Related Holdings in September
Holdings Accounted for 38% of Bond Fund at End of Month, Compared With 41% in August
By Min Zeng
Oct. 9, 2014 8:34 p.m. ET

Pimco’s Total Return Fund, the world’s largest bond fund, cut U.S. government-related debt holdings in September amid an abrupt departure of the fund’s famed manager, Bill Gross.

U.S. government-related holdings accounted for 38% of the $201.6 billion bond fund at the end of last month, compared with 41% at the end of August, according to data available late Thursday on Pacific Investment Management Co.’s website.

The Pimco fund’s U.S. government-related holdings include Treasury bonds, Treasury inflation-protected securities, Treasury futures and derivatives linked to U.S. government debt securities.

Mr. Gross surprised the investing world on Sept. 26 when he announced his departure from Pimco, which he co-founded in 1971, following a year of heavy outflows from the Pimco flagship bond fund and a showdown with his former chief executive and heir apparent.

Investors are keeping a close eye on the asset allocation because any significant changes could affect prices of some financial assets given the fund’s massive size. One worry following Mr. Gross’s exit has been whether Pimco needs to sell holdings to meet cash outflows from clients.

Investors withdrew a net $23.5 billion from the Pimco Total Return Fund last month.

“A fund that large can cause a downdraft in prices for a given asset class if they wanted to quickly reallocate away from a given security type,’’ said Adrian Miller, director of fixed-income strategies at GMP Securities LLC in New York. “Having Bill leave is fine for those not happy with his performance and management style, but now Pimco needs to convince current and disgruntled investors that the firm has the answers to right the ship.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:14:14

What will you do if the market falls?
Published: Oct 11, 2014 8:10 a.m. ET
How to avoid self-destructive investing
By Jonathan Clements
Running for the exit isn’t always the right move.

During a stock-market decline, there are those who panic and sell. And then there are those who don’t have any choice.

In late 2008 and early 2009, I remember talking to many investors who lost their nerve as share prices plummeted. Some of those who dumped stocks were folks I considered to be seasoned investors.

But today’s column is aimed at a different group: those who set themselves up for failure before share prices even decline — by pursuing high-risk investment strategies that just don’t make sense for the typical investor.

Flirting with zero

Let’s say you take out a margin loan, which involves borrowing against your portfolio’s value. You then use that money to buy additional shares, so you end up owning, say, twice as much stock as you could otherwise afford.

That leverage should prove mighty rewarding if shares rally from here. But if, instead, stocks tumble, you could get a margin call demanding that you repay part of the loan. At that point, you might be forced to sell shares and give up all chance of recouping your losses. In a sign of the market’s frothiness, margin borrowing has doubled since the start of 2010.

Selling put options can also lead to permanent losses. When you sell a put, you receive a premium from the option’s buyer. In return, you give the buyer the right to sell you shares at a specified price. If the stock falls far below that price, you will lose a fistful of money—and the premium received will be scant compensation.

You could also suffer large, permanent losses if you bet heavily on a few stocks. While it’s reasonable to expect the broad market to rebound from a severe decline, there are plenty of individual stocks that plunge and never recover. Just think about all the dot-com companies that went out of business during the 2000-02 bear market.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 11:05:42

Heard on the Street
Slowing China Could Give Fed the Chills
By Justin Lahart
Oct. 10, 2014 3:44 p.m. ET

The slowing of China’s economy is pushing down on prices in the U.S. There may be much more pressure to come.

With recent economic data even weaker than expected, there lately has been a reassessment of how fast China is likely to grow. Last week, the World Bank lowered its forecast for Chinese gross-domestic-product growth in 2014 to 7.4% from 7.6%, and in 2015 to 7.2% from 7.5%. Many private forecasts are lower.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:17:57

“Many private forecasts are lower.”

Even ABQDan was shading his forecasts lower than 7.5% in his last few HBB posts.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:18:57

Can’t wait for him to resurface here with some Rasmussen poll results as the 2016 election approaches!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Shillow
2014-10-11 13:46:59

Obaby keeps going the way he’s going he ain’t gonna need Rasmussen polls.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:44:47

Outside the Box
Opinion: Investor who predicted the subprime crisis says stocks will fall 10%-plus
Published: Oct 10, 2014 5:08 p.m. ET
Lawrence G. McDonald says to buy certain beaten-down commodities
By Michael Brush

With the stock market in such a funk, it’s a great time to check in with someone who knows a thing or two about meltdowns.

That would be Lawrence G. McDonald, who says (with Patrick Robinson) in his New York Times best-seller, “A Colossal Failure of Common Sense,” that he warned colleagues at Lehman Brothers of the coming subprime storm and how it might hurt the investment bank.

Nowadays, McDonald is the head of U.S. macro strategy at Newedge, where he uses a six-factor capitulation model to judge when sentiment has broken down so much, a sector is worth buying.

It’s an indicator for true contrarians that can suggest the best time to buy a sector because everyone else hates it so much, they’re all trying to get out at once.

Too many people have the attitude of ‘don’t try to catch a falling knife.’ But you can take advantage of big sell-offs.

– Lawrence G. McDonald

This is the kind of tool that might come in handy right about now, given concern over the stock market — and the outright hatred of asset classes like gold, coal, uranium — all of which McDonald favors for a bounce right now.

I’ve watched McDonald make some great market-timing calls over the years, so I think he’s worth listening to. Like anyone, he’s not always right. But most recently, McDonald was bullish on Brazil right before the 7% jump in the iShares MSCI Brazil Index (EWZ, -4.38%) on Oct. 6. He was bullish on U.S. bonds in late August 2013, and late September 2014 ahead of big rallies; and gold last December ahead of a huge, three-month rally.

“Too many people have the attitude of ‘don’t try to catch a falling knife.’ But you can take advantage of big sell-offs,” says McDonald. “When the selling abates, it is like a storm that clears. The sky is blue and there is really nobody left to sell for the next three weeks to three months.”

Take note of that last phrase. A lot of times, these are just short-term trading calls of one to three months, and not buy-and-forget calls. He also prefers to play capitulations via ETFs, as opposed to stocks, which are riskier.

With those provisos, let’s take a look at some of his current calls.
Lawrence G. McDonald, head of U.S. macro strategy at Newedge, expects gold, coal and uranium to bounce from their lows.

U.S. stocks headed for more losses: McDonald expects a correction of 10% or more, which means we are less than halfway there, at best. Three factors point to more trouble ahead.

1. Oil and gas make up a big part of the S&P 500, and they probably have more downside — and some profit warnings to boot — because oil has fallen so much.

2. Many companies with big foreign exposure will report earnings misses and downward guidance, because the strong dollar means overseas earnings translate back into fewer greenbacks. That might shake up investors some more.

3. A lot of investors around the globe own U.S. stocks, and they’re now selling on concerns about global weakness hurting the U.S. economy. “Everyone was crowded into the U.S. trade,” says McDonald.

While there will no doubt be rallies on the way down, all of this spells trouble. “Between now and year-end you buy fear and sell rallies,” he says.

One hedged trade to consider: Go long small caps, or the iShares Russell 2000 (ETF IWN, -0.90%) because those stocks are so washed out, trading near a 52-week low. And go short an equal amount on large caps, say, the SPDR S&P 500 (ETF SPY, -1.14%) because it probably has greater downside, since it has not fallen as much.

The dollar weakness will continue: McDonald was negative on the dollar before Wednesday’s reversal on news of the Fed’s concern about greenback strength damaging U.S. economic growth. Now he thinks dollar weakness will continue for three reasons.

1. The dollar was simply way too overbought.

2. The U.S. is under pressure from China to weaken the dollar to help China’s economy. The Chinese yuan is linked to the U.S. dollar via a “crawling peg,” so a stronger yuan hurts non-U.S. demand for Chinese exports.

3. Global economic weakness is bound to bring down U.S. growth. That will push Fed interest-rate hikes out into 2016, he says. Many investors are not expecting this, since consensus recently suggested the Fed to start rate hikes in June 2015. That’s not going to happen, maintains McDonald. A delay in rates hikes would lower demand for dollars, in part because U.S.-denominated debt would look less attractive.

McDonald expects dollar weakness to continue for about three months.

MarketWatch Partner Center
340 comments
666 people listening

jp mahoga 13 minutes ago

I’ve watched McDonald make some great market-timing calls over the years, so I think he’s worth listening to. Like anyone, he’s not always right.

So listen to him unless you shouldn’t. Got it.

Any other random variables you’d like to recommend?

Tarot Cards? (They’ve made some great market-timing calls over the years, so I think they’re worth listening to. Like anyone, they’re not always right.)

Chicken entrails? (They’ve made some great market-timing calls over the years, so I think they’re worth listening to. Like anyone, they’re not always right.)

20-sided dice? (They’ve made some great market-timing calls over the years, so I think they’re worth listening to. Like anyone, they’re not always right.)

Grim Reaper 21 minutes ago

S&P going back to 1,750 range at the minimum, that’s only a 13.5% pullback that the R2K has already exceeded.

Hopefully we pullback to the 1,300 range, that would be spectacular and set up a great buying opportunity!

In the meantime happy to be 65% leveraged short.

Alex 1 hour ago

I’m ok with a 10% drop in the market in October 2014. The key right now is these employment figures coming out each month and they look healthy so eventually the more these future individual investors find work and contribute in their employers 401k even if just the min of say 1% to 3% at an aggregate it should keep the equity market healthy. The live birth rate from ‘71 to ‘76 relative to prior worries me the most.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:51:54

“The dollar weakness will continue:…”

Uh-huh…

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:54:25

ft dot com
Dollar strength starts to cause headaches
By Michael Mackenzie in New York
Slide in stocks echoes Fed concern about dollar impact on exports

The US dollar is beginning to cast a lengthy shadow across financial markets and the policy outlook at the Federal Reserve.

Having risen relentlessly since May, the dollar’s advance had hitherto largely escaped the attention of investors. To them, a firming dollar reflected a strengthening US economy and one that could handle increases in interest rates during 2015.

As the end of October approaches, however, investors are increasingly mindful of the formal end of quantitative easing, or QE3, by the Fed. Asset classes that prospered during the money printing era, notably equities, commodities, junk debt and inflation bonds, have been buffeted by dollar strength and fears are growing that this may be just the start of an extended trend.

No one doubts that a stronger dollar translates into a tightening of financial conditions and that is what causes so much concern at the moment. While the US economy looks in better shape than many rivals, a further rise in the dollar could well dent activity with tough implications for the current hefty valuations of equities and other riskier assets.

In the equity market, a rout in commodity prices, driven by sharply lower oil prices, has hammered energy shares in recent months. A broader concern focuses on the potential hit to foreign based earnings for large S&P 500 multinational companies and how much a stronger dollar weighs on export growth.

This point was addressed by the central bank this week with the Fed’s September meeting minutes released on Wednesday identifying a stronger dollar courtesy of a weakening eurozone as having “adverse effects” on exports and the broader economy.

A sliding share market earlier this week was duly reversed by such talk with the S&P 500 posting the largest one-day gain in nearly a year on Wednesday. Clearly, efforts by the Fed to hose down the rising dollar and rate increase expectations worked for a few hours. However, the S&P subsequently slumped 2.1 per cent on Thursday and the dollar rallied anew.

At this juncture, the correction in equity prices from last month’s record close on the S&P 500 remains modest, but that may be tested once third-quarter earnings start rolling during the rest of October.

Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank, says he is watching to see whether the strong dollar is the “new polar vortex” echoing how investors blamed a cold winter for a sluggish first quarter. “Companies will soon tells us about how they view the dollar and what that means for their business expectations.”

Troubling for S&P 500 companies, the dollar story may have only started, as the eurozone and Japan seek weaker currencies in order to jump start their slumping economies. Moreover, the dollar rebound has been broad based, rallying against currencies ranging from Australia, Canada, UK to Brazil.

Alan Ruskin, strategist at Deutsche Bank says feedback loops from the stronger dollar are influencing bonds and equities.

The combination of declining bond yields and lower equity prices tend to suggest disinflationary forces and slower growth prospects.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:58:22

US Dollar Gains Despite Drop After Federal Reserve Concerns About Its Strength
By Meagan Clark @MeaganKaym.clark@ibtimes.com on
October 10 2014 11:18 AM
American dollar notes are displayed. Reuters

The U.S. dollar gained against a basket of major currencies Friday for the second day, erasing a decline earlier this week after the Federal Reserve policymakers expressed concern about the impact of a strong dollar on the U.S. economy.

The dollar has surged about 10 percent over the past five months against a basket of currencies to reach a four-year high last week. On Friday, in late morning trading, it gained 0.3 percent, according to Bloomberg’s Dollar Spot Index that tracks the currency against 10 major counterparts.

Earlier this week a series of events set up the greenback for volatility. On Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund lowered its forecast for global economic growth to 3.8 percent in 2015 from the 4 percent it predicted in July. U.S. stocks fell sharply after the news.

Then on Wednesday, the Fed released minutes from its most recent meeting noting policymakers’ concerns that the dollar’s strength could slow a needed rebound in inflation. Investors have taken the Fed’s worries about the dollar as evidence that it will wait months, possibly until September of next year rather than July of next year, before raising interest rates, which would further strengthen the dollar. That sent the dollar down and stocks back up, but gains Thursday and Friday morning wiped out the decline.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 13:00:47

4:32 pm ET
Oct 10, 2014
Currency
Dollar Strength May Be Irritating Washington
By Ian Talley
CONNECT

The dollar’s strength may be finally irritating Washington.

Earlier this week, U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew didn’t seem all that bothered about the dollar’s recent rise.

But Friday he reminded his counterparts meeting at the annual IMF and World Bank meetings here that they need to stick to their currency commitments against competitive devaluation. “In light of the weakening global backdrop, it is especially important that all G-7 and G-20 countries adhere steadfastly to their exchange rate commitments,” he said in prepared remarks to the IMF’s steering committee.

“G-7 countries should stand by their commitment to orient fiscal and monetary policies toward domestic objectives using domestic instruments and not target exchange rates,” Mr. Lew said. “G-20 members should move more rapidly toward more market-determined exchange rate systems and exchange rate flexibility reflecting underlying fundamentals, avoid persistent exchange rate misalignments, refrain from competitive devaluation, and not target exchange rates for competitive purposes.”

Amid a weaker global outlook, the strengthening U.S. recovery has attracted investors and bolstered the greenback’s valued against a host of other currencies.

Adding to Washington’s headaches, officials in U.S. allies Europe and Japan have in recent months appeared to be talking down the value of their exchange rates. Those currency differentials essentially exports their problems overseas, with the U.S. economy having to do the heavy lifting as its products become more expensive in the global market place.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 13:02:52

The action going forward seems likely to be driven by the interplay of a dollar that fundamentally wants to strengthen as the QE3 punchbowl is withdrawn and the Fed jawbones eventual interest rate normalization, and offsetting stealth interventions to weaken the dollar.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 13:05:23

You have to wonder if these guys like McDonald talk the opposite of their book in order to lure greater fools into taking the other side of their trades. His comments about dollar weakness are inane and fly in the face of present market reality.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 13:51:00

October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks.

The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February.

― Mark Twain

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 05:25:40

Obama has added more to the US government deficit than ALL the other administrations COMBINED and accounting for inflation.

I have a better idea. Why don’t we sh*tcan world socialism and let free markets thrive?

Where does IMF they think the funds come from for increased spending? Sure, you can simply run the printing presses and how do you think that is going to end? Or you can run a deficit and force the next generation to cope with it.

Or you can live within your means.

———————-

With world economy stuttering, governments urged to open purse
GMA News / Reuters ^ | October 10, 2014 | Howard Schneider and Anna Yukhananov

World economic leaders are being urged to rally around a plan to let government do what it does best - spend money - in an effort to buoy a global economy that remains slack and slowing.

The effort comes as six years of crisis fighting have lapsed with little guarantee the world economy is on a stable footing. Germany is in danger of slipping into recession, China has slowed, and U.S. policymakers are concerned a fresh bout of global weakness will stymie the U.S. recovery as well.

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde issued a blunt call on Thursday for the United States and Germany to open the taps and spend more on infrastructure, a stark reversal from the Fund’s recent fixation on holding down government debt and lifting economies through “structural reforms” that have proved politically difficult to implement.

“It is a question of doing it, not just talking about it,” Lagarde said….

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 07:36:48

Keynesian kneejerk stimulus policy isn’t dead…just yet.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-10-11 07:50:10

I have a better idea. Why don’t we sh*tcan world socialism and let free markets thrive?

Because the billionaires and bankers like things just the way they are.

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 08:14:19

We cannot sh*tcan socialism in the USA until we stop abolish BOTHA welfare AND imperialism.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-10-11 08:39:44

Bush || did the same. I think we’re on track for every president from here on out to do the same thing. Exponential debt forever. We can plunder the incomes of thousands of years worth of future generations.

If we stop, the whole thing burns down. The point of no return was passed in the late 80s.

 
Comment by Overbanked
2014-10-11 10:30:58

“Obama has added more to the US government deficit than ALL the other administrations COMBINED and accounting for inflation.”

And it will be worse 2 years from now after the GOP has been the majority in the House for 6 years.

I haven’t cast a vote in the election for my local House Representative the last 2 elections. I won’t vote for a Republican and I won’t vote for a Democrat that acts like a Republican.

Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 10:49:27

I can’t keep up with leftie logic.

Clinton is the man because he balanced the budget (the republican controlled house at the time is never mentioned)

Obama adds more to the deficit than all the other previous administrations combined and had a democrat supermajority in the house and a filibuster proof democrat senate when he first became president…

and he still controls the senate today

but today’s obama deficits are all the fault of the house republicans….

Comment by Overbanked
2014-10-11 10:53:25

I think you’re starting to get it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 05:34:16

The hypocrisy of liberals/democrats on display is this little article.

1. This is the REAL war on women.

2. Imagine, lefties, if you forced to join and forced to pay dues (as a condition of employment) and most of that money was used to support pro-gun, pro-traditional marriage, pro-life groups, Rush Limbaugh and the republicans. You would be outraged. You would call it unamerican and unconstitutional.

3. She has to SHOW ID and show up in person to quit the union. Isn’t that racist and discriminatory? Or - only when democrats want to propagate voter fraud you don’t need ID.

I have said it before. Conservatives are more than happy to live under the same laws/taxes they want for everyone else. Liberals/democrats/progressive expect to be exempted from the same laws/taxes they want for everyone else.

————–

Michigan truck driver files coercion charge against UAW union
Reuters (Yahoo News) - 10/10/2014

DETROIT (Reuters) - A truck driver in Michigan filed a charge of coercion against the United Auto Workers union for keeping her from exercising her right to quit the union and stop paying dues, according to the National Right to Work Foundation.

Michigan became the 24th so-called “right-to-work” U.S. state after a contentious battle in the state’s legislature in December 2012. This means means that workers cannot be required to join a union or be forced to pay union dues.

Kathleen Sulkowski, a driver for CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc, filed the charge on Wednesday at the Detroit office of the National Labor Relations Board, the right-to-work group said.

Sulkowski sent a letter in August to officials at the UAW Local 600 union in Dearborn, expressing her desire to quit the union. But in mid-September, a Local 600 official responded that to do so she would have to come to the union hall and provide identification in order to quit.

“UAW union officials’ latest tactic to show up in person and furnish photo identification is designed to dissuade or intimidate workers from exercising their rights to refrain from membership,” Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation, said in a statement issued on Friday.

Michigan auto workers at General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co and Chrysler Group, a unit of Fiat SpA, are not eligible to quit the unions voluntarily until their current contracts expire in September 2015.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 05:45:20

San Diego, CA Sale Prices Plunge 6% YoY; Excess Housing Inventory Surges

http://www.zillow.com/san-diego-ca-92115/home-values/

Comment by SD Renter no more
2014-10-11 07:03:48

That shows that the area code show went up by 4.9%. Where do you get the plunging of 6%?

Also, not the greatest neighborhood in San Diego but still went up.

Please point out the drop. I really want to know. I don’t want to prove you wrong. I want to prove ME wrong.

Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 07:21:23

I want to prove ME wrong ??

He can’t…Don’t open his links…Don’t respond to him…All he does it put the same garbage out everyday….

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 07:48:11

Sale prices my friends…. sale prices. They fell 6% in San Diego.

Here’s some more.

Santa Ana, CA Sale Prices Plummet 10% YoY

http://www.zillow.com/santa-ana-ca-92704/home-values/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:38:18

PS- Rent or be owned.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:37:57

92704 Median Sale Price Change

May 2014 $410K
Aug 2014 $309K
Three month decrease in median sale price = -$101K
Three month percentage decline in median sale price
-($101K/$410K) X 100% = -25%
Annualized rate of median sale price change =
((309/410)^4-1) X 100% = -68%.

The numbers are all there, but it takes a little effort to find them.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 13:03:35

“The numbers are all there, but it takes a little effort to find them.”

Indeed they are. Dave is so far underwater he can’t bring himself to analyze the data.

 
 
 
Comment by butters
2014-10-11 07:47:43

Look into your heart, you know you are wrong buying a house at the peak level.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 07:52:54

It’s nothing to lose sleep over. How many millions of suckers signed up for a lifetime(30 years of earnings is a lifetime) of debt on a depreciating asset at a grossly inflated price in the last 15 years?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Shillow
2014-10-11 08:04:26

Choose median sale price from the drop down menu and click on view data table. Zillow shills try to use a “home value” which is a blend of listing and actually sold prices to maintain the illusion prices aren’t dropping. Actual sale prices show otherwise.

These links are valuable data.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 11:41:02

The real story in the 92115 zip code median sale prices lies between the level reached in late 2011, right before the onset of the Bernanke QE3 mortgage market stimulus in January 2012, the recent peak price, and the way forward as QE3 mortgage market stimulus is withdrawn.

Here are snap shots of median sale prices at various points:

September 2011 $249K (near pre-QE3 stimulus trough)
May 2014 $418K (post-QE3 stimulus peak)
August 2014 $369K (QE3 stimulus wind-down phase)

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-10-11 06:04:37

Step 1: Dumb ‘em down.
Step 2: Prosper.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-10/home-atm-back-helocs-surge-2008-levels

“It’s as if the lesson of the previous bubble was completely forgotten in a couple of years.”

“Are these people really that dumb?”

Thankfully, they are.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 06:21:57

And with the obama bailouts and obama QEs…

The banks have already sold this crap paper (at PAR) to the US taxpayers…

It is good to be a 1%er!

And FREE JOHN CORZINE!

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-10-11 06:26:32

“It is good to be a 1%er!”

Yes indeedy. The ninety-nine percenters work, the one-percenters reap.

God’s plan.

Comment by Shillow
2014-10-11 10:47:59

Yes indeedy. The ninety-nine percenters work, the one-percenters reap.

What percentage of that 99 percent is actually working?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-10-11 06:24:23

Bahahahahahahaha … I’m for establishing a national “Thank a teacher” day, a day that should be celebrated throughout the land.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 
Comment by SUGuy
2014-10-11 08:12:41

“Are these people really that dumb?”

The dumbest decision I have ever seen recently in getting a loan was by an accounting professor with a phd and her husband who was a CFO at a 250 million dollar company. They borrowed 35K paying $1500 per month for 5 years. These people are in their late 40”s with kids. I was so shocked that I am actually posting this on a blog.

Shakes his head

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-10-11 08:57:36

$1500 per month X 12 months/year X 5 years = $90,000.

Borrow $35,000 and pay back $90,000.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

People are smart.

Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 09:01:35

Those better be some amazing boobs and granite countertops…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 13:55:40

Shoot. Once in the early 90’s I had some software program that calculated what I would pay over 30 years on my mortgage. I borrowed $93,000 and it came out to be around $300,000 at the end of 30 years. I was numbed by that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 19:36:18

Luckily the average length of time most people are in a mortgage is well below ten years. The supposed 30-year mortgage is nothing but a fictitious strawman so far as most home debtors are concerned.

And by the way, almost all of the payments over the first seven-or-so years of a thirty-year mortgage go to the lender as interest payments..

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 19:40:27

54 months = 4 1/2 years is the record high mortgage age!

Mortgage age hits a record high on tight credit, interest rates
October 6, 2014, 1:14 PM ET

Mortgages are getting old, a sign that some families are still struggling to get a new loan, while others have already refinanced and are enjoying their cheap monthly payments, according to a report released Monday.

The average mortgage age hit a record-high of 54-plus months in August, up from an average of about 50 months in the year-earlier period, according to Black Knight Financial Services, a mortgage technology and information services firm based in Jacksonville, Fla. That age statistic shows how long a borrower has a loan before paying it off, typically through a home sale or refinancing, or before the loan was closed due to a foreclosure.

“The more newer loans you have, the lower the loan age,” said Kostya Gradushy, Black Knight’s research and analytics manager.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 19:52:47

Suppose a Californian takes out a $500K 30-year loan at 6% to buy a starter home, and pays it off after 54 months. What percent of his payments went to interest?

Monthly payment = $3K
Total payments after 54 months = $162K
Remaining principle owed after 54 months = $469.6K
Principle paid off after 54 months = $30.4K (19% of total)
Interest payments after 54 months = $131.6K (81% of total)

Looks pretty good for the lender; not so good for the home debtor. And this example ignores the risk the home’s market value drops over the 54 months after purchase.

 
 
 
Comment by Interested Observer
2014-10-11 09:00:58

$1500 x 60 (months) = $90,000

Mr. Banker must be very happy.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-10-11 09:07:25

Yep. I’m especially happy that once they get this loan paid off they’ll most likely come visit me so they can do another one.

“You can’t lose with the stuff I use.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 13:48:50

always fun to see what I am missing when my bank sends me a statement showing what the interst on my credit card would be if I have a balance. So fun to laugh at the dim witted debt docks.

 
 
 
Comment by Shillow
2014-10-11 06:16:11

Inventory is exploding.

But where are the buyers?

Prices are falling.

Realtors are liars.

Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 06:24:59

Get on the property ladder NOW!

Or you will be priced out forever!

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:00:57

“Realtors are liars.”

Indeed they are.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 06:52:56

I was at a mixer yesterday evening for business types. A property manager told me that a big investor group that has about 1,400 houses here approached him to find buyers for their holdings. They are looking to sell in lots of 4 houses, so they don’t “flood the market”. Later I was talking with a mortgage broker. He said they are seeing lots of “seconds”, going on to say it was mostly HELOC’s and that people don’t have the concept of paying a house off anymore. That they will always have a mortgage payment. He said they often write 30 year loan applications for people in their 60′ to 70’s.

Comment by goon squad
2014-10-11 07:03:40

“mostly HELOC’s and that people don’t have the concept of paying a house off anymore”

A nation of broke @ss loosers

 
Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 07:26:22

He said they often write 30 year loan applications for people in their 60′ to 70’s ??

I am not surprised at this Ben…I see it around me…Bottom line is many elderly even if they are homeowners have very low monthly income and the cost of living just continues to eat into that income….Its why you have seen the reverse mortgage market proliferate…Just look at the snake oil salesman’s pitching it on TV…

Comment by butters
2014-10-11 07:44:28

Bottom line is many elderly even if they are homeowners have very low monthly income and the cost of living just continues to eat into that income

Wha….? Cheap money is no so cheap, is it?

Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 07:52:53

Cheap money is no so cheap, is it ??

The cost is irrelevant if you have to have it….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by butters
2014-10-11 09:01:08

Reverse Mortgage - another gift the grifter gave to americans other than Greenspan.

 
 
Comment by butters
2014-10-11 07:31:02

Uh Oh! better get Maaco!

This sucker will go down…it would be interesting to see what Yellon does.

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-10-11 07:44:00

“… it was mostly HELOC’s and that people don’t have the concept of paying a house off anymore.”

Bahahahahaha … P.T. Barnum was right on!

“That they will always have a mortgage payment. He said they often write 30 year loan applications for people in their 60′ to 70’s.”

Bahahahahahahahaha … Don’t send your money to the landlord, send it to a banker instead.

Bahahahahahahahaha … life is good.

Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 08:01:08

Bahahahahahahahaha … Don’t send your money to the landlord, send it to a banker instead ??

Whats the difference to someone in their 70’s ??

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:39:53

The difference is rental rates are half the cost of a principle, interest, taxes, insurance and depreciation.

Why pay double the price for shelter?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 13:38:47

Mark Taylor Apartments are very attractive, upscale, and have carefree lifestyles. Those are in Phoenix. In California I am aware of the Avalon Bay apartments. It’s just that either community is not in my budget. I really love my Phoenix aparment layout and it’s in the quietist part of the community. Very peaceful.

In any case, it is so far cheaper to rent than to own. And you are comfortable knowing no deadbeats are allowed. No felons either. Can’t say the same for SFHS nabes. We read about those people who occupy the house they have not paid a mortgage paymen on for several years, nor own the house.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 07:58:32

Encino, CA Asking Prices Crater 27% As Sellers Slash Prices And Inventory Balloons

http://www.movoto.com/encino-ca/market-trends/

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-10-11 14:19:04

“That they will always have a mortgage payment. He said they often write 30 year loan applications for people in their 60′ to 70’s.”

Then it won’t be long before they are writing 70 year loan applications for people in their 20′ to 30’s.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 07:08:50

‘Mexico is helping some of its citizens apply for a controversial immigration program in the U.S. called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. Before applying for DACA, Tania Guzman was worried about revealing to the U.S. government that she left Mexico City and crossed the border illegally when she was 7 years old.’

‘Now 30, Guzman says she also worried about the cost, especially after she learned she would have to pay at least a couple of thousand dollars for immigration attorneys to help prepare her DACA application. “It was a big factor,” says Guzman, who works as a part-time personal assistant and baby sitter in Los Angeles. “It’s a lot of money, and I was struggling.”

‘She finally managed to apply last October after her lawyer from Public Counsel, a pro bono law firm based in California, told her she qualified for financial assistance from the Mexican Consulate in Los Angeles. Since 2012, that consulate has set aside $250,000 to help, so far, more than 260 Mexican citizens apply for DACA.’

‘Guzman, who was granted deferred action in May, says she paid $50. The rest of her attorney’s and application fees were covered by Mexico. “We are here [in the U.S.] basically not doing anything for our country, I will say. So it’s a great thing to know that even though you’re not in Mexico, you still get help from them,” Guzman says.’

‘The Mexican Embassy in Washington, D.C., does not keep track of how many DACA applications the consulates have funded nationwide, according to Julian Escutia, head of the embassy’s consular coordination and Hispanic affairs section. Paying for DACA applications, he added, is just one way Mexican consulates are trying to support Mexican citizens living in the U.S.’

“If it’s a program that helps youth to work in this country, well, that helps our nationals, and that helps us,” he said.’

‘When asked why Mexico is helping its citizens find ways to stay in the U.S., Escutia said that is not the Mexican government’s main objective.’

“Our main objective is the well-being of our nationals wherever they are,” he said. “So what we want for them is that they are successful and really continue contributing to this country [the U.S.].”

‘Mexico’s support for DACA applicants may seem counterintuitive, says Emily Edmonds-Poli, a professor who teaches Mexican politics at the University of San Diego, but she said it shows that the Mexican government is acknowledging a decades-long migration trend that led to 9 percent of people born in Mexico now living in the U.S.’

‘That has driven Mexico to build better relations with Mexicans abroad in hopes of maintaining remittance flows and other cross-border economic activity.’

“I think the message that it’s trying to send is that the Mexican government supports its population living in the U.S.,” Edmonds-Poli says. “I don’t think that that is the message that will be received in the U.S.”

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 07:15:22

Think about what a scam all this stuff is. Oh, but we need a higher minimum wage! While at the same time, people who can’t come up with a few hundred bucks (after living here for years!) are given the money to hire attorneys to stay in the US. What are the chances this woman is also receiving welfare and other government goodies? I see the benefit for Mexico. I don’t see what’s in it for US citizens.

Comment by goon squad
2014-10-11 07:20:54

“I don’t see what’s in it for US citizens”

Citizens? What a quaint concept that was.

Comment by phony scandals
2014-10-11 14:22:01

“I don’t see what’s in it for US citizens”

“We are all Americans — north and south in this hemisphere”

Pelosi then bizarrely said she wished she could simply “take home” the thousands of minors temporarily housed in the overburden facilities.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 19:53:59

…she wished she could simply “take home” the thousands of minors temporarily housed…

What’s standing in her way?

 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 07:29:06

What are the chances this woman is also receiving welfare and other government goodies ??

100% ??

I see the benefit for Mexico. I don’t see what’s in it for US citizens ??

+1….

Comment by butters
2014-10-11 07:37:10

1. Permanent Democratic super majority
2. Future debt owners
3. Cheap labor to build your overpriced shack.

Win, win, baby!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 08:24:04

Years ago, when I realized I was all wet on my immigration thinking, and I saw it as destructive to the economy, I started considering all the polices that were similar. For instance, why did the US, when it was strong, decide to begin these trade policies that sent factories, legally, out of the country. And at the exact same time, we were told by Greenspan and other, the US was to become the worlds economic engine; by borrowing and consuming, of course. Wouldn’t you know it, the US went from the biggest creditor nation to the biggest debtor in about 10 years.

Why, I asked myself. I came to the conclusion the US and others are being torn down on purpose. One of the little understood purposes of illegal immigration is to degrade the nation state. It’s always the globalist that are pushing this stuff. They disregard borders and laws and the silly people who don’t realize that the globalist are truly enlightened.

It’s the only reason I can think of why our government drives these self destructive policies. Decade after decade, wearing down our earning potential, our future economic prospects. Saddling us with what is now amounts of debt and obligations that can never be payed. These people aren’t stupid; they know this is happening. IMO, it has to be that it is what they intend to occur. And I realize, that is a scary thought.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 08:49:55

A conspiracy theory with 1000 of people involved that lasts over 50 years?

I go for the more simple theory.

Illegals, dirt poor legal immigrant, muslims, those who do not want to assimilate, those who want free sh*t without work vote solidly for one party.

From the 1964 Ted Kennedy Immigration Reform that threw open the gates to pretty much anyone to LBJ’s war on poverty - it is all about votes and power. NEVER about results.

Yes - it can be that simple. The left wants to prevent a Reagan or Thatcher from ever winning again. Their base was deserting them. Import a new base.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 09:33:04

‘The left wants to prevent a Reagan or Thatcher from ever winning again’

‘“Pres­i­dent Reagan ulti­mately came to under­stand Trilateral’s value and invited the entire mem­ber­ship to a recep­tion at the White House in April 1984″
 – David Rock­e­feller, Mem­oirs, 2002

Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission wrote in 2004, “The notion of total national security is now a myth. Total security and total defense in the age of globalization are not attainable. The real issue is: with how much insecurity can America live while promoting its interests in an increasingly interactive, interdependent world? Insecurity, while uncomfortable, has been the fate of many other nations for centuries. For America, there is no longer a choice; even if socially disagreeable, its insecurity has to be politically manageable.”

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 10:43:19

Zbigniew’s big idea has America over a barrel.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 10:59:40

More complex conspiracy theories.

Usually the simple explanation is one the one that is true.

Who benefits from open borders, no immigration policy and no deportations:
The Democrat Party
Those who want bigger and bigger government
Socialists
The rich
Those who want cheap labor

Who loses from open borders, no immigration policy and no deportations:
The Republican Party
Those who want a smaller and less intrusive government
Independent minded folks
Entrepreneurs
The environment
The middle class who get crushed in higher and higher taxes, increased crime and failing schools
Those in low wage/low skill jobs (ironically - blacks)

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 11:41:37

‘Who loses from open borders’

Everybody in the receiving country. So why would anybody advocate this if they cared about a peoples future? They don’t care about our future.

Anyway, you apparently haven’t noticed all the Republicans pushing amnesty. Heck, in Arizona, both Senators were in the gang of 8. What about the house speaker? Paul Ryan, Rubio?

BTW, calling stuff conspiracy theory is kinda 1980’s.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 13:04:50

Let’s see…

Obama wants amnesty
The democrat controlled senate wants amnesty
According to you - republicans want amnesty

So why hasn’t amnesty passed?

Even if you are called a racist for opposing amnesty

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 13:11:13

‘why hasn’t amnesty passed’

Probably two reasons. Incumbents are afraid of voter reaction and the tea party.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 13:17:59

Isn’t the mere notion of amnesty radioactive at this point? It should be.

These POS want to be politicians and elected oversee’ers must be blind to the pulse.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 07:48:42

What’s in it for the liberal voter who backs such policies?

Comment by butters
2014-10-11 07:54:46

They get to prove Einstein’s Theory of Insanity.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 08:24:30

I pound the same thing on my Facebook anti war posts. Einstein’s theory of insanity is why the U.S. has been turning the Middle East more violent by the decade, so much so that the violence has been exported to the USA. And Saudi Arabia fuels it too. Just saw this morning that my young second cousin, former West Point Cadet, who argued with me civilly over the wars, now “likes” the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Ha think some of my agitation is starting to influence others yet?

A gal friend of mine posted on FB about a home invasion by cops in Georgia and the occupants were in their late 50s. No drugs at all. that is the first anti statist post I saw from her.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:32:28

The incident in GA you speak of is occurring more frequently on a widespread basis. CYA, especially when in a vehicle.

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 08:33:07

some of you might be aware of the Ayn Rand institute. I like the philosophy of objectivism. I don’t like the cult part of it which is actually not objective at all. For instance, I saw a post from a lady that the outcry over police is a leftist conspiracy to destroy law. Even after I posted a link to policestateusa. I told her she is blind. I gave her only two examples and said she conveniently ignored the URL.

Some people do not want the truth. Those are the ones who are cultists. Thankfully, there are so few of them. They are as much an oddity as the Moonies of the 70s. powerless. the people who have active minds allow new ideas in their heads, and to work with them, think them through.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 08:54:20

Just saw this morning that my young second cousin, former West Point Cadet, who argued with me civilly over the wars, now “likes” the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Most soldiers and ESPECIALLY combat vets do NOT want war.

They will be ones fighting it. They will be the ones away from home. They be the ones coming home in a body bags or a wheel chairs.

Maybe there is a lesson in there.

And PS - If you don’t believe me - go to a local VA and strike up some conversations

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 09:00:48

This one never went into combat but is a service connected disabled veteran from an injury while on maneuvers. Severely injured. My dad was injured in WW II. Mine explosion. my dad was anti war longer than my second cousin has been alive. now my cousin is coming around. he communicates with his West Point friends a lot. Some or many of them have seen combat and I assume he is seeing that a soldier’s life is not really something to worship. I go so far to say they are not really heroes, not in the wars since WW II.

 
Comment by butters
2014-10-11 09:08:50


Most soldiers and ESPECIALLY combat vets do NOT want war.

Then who wants war? Since the fighters don’t want to fight….there’s got be a constituency that’s not affected one iota by war or worse profiting from it, no?

 
Comment by Combotechie
2014-10-11 09:37:47

“Then who wants war? Since the fighters don’t want to fight….there’s got be a constituency that’s not affected one iota by war or worse profiting from it, no?”

Go here for a possible answer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Heroes_Channel

Think of The American Hero’s Channel as one long, extended commercial that promotes the military.

Combine this commercial with the saying “Youth is wasted on the young” and I think you’ll have it.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 08:01:09

What’s in it for the liberal voter who backs such policies?

1. Permanent Democratic super majority

However - Liberal Do Not Think It Means What It Really Means”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 07:51:27

Remember…. current grossly inflated asking prices of resale housing are 400% higher than construction cost(lot labor materials and profit).

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 07:55:56

Cypress, CA Sale Prices Sink 4% YoY; Sellers Slash Prices On Cratering Demand

http://www.zillow.com/cypress-ca/home-values/

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:04:40

“California Most Impoverish State In The US”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_poverty_rate

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:29:06

RMS added some data the other day in addition to the data I posted above.

CA has 13% of US population but 34% of the welfare cases.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-10-11 08:41:34

They gather here to feast off the crumbs of the wealthy. Not much in the way of scraps in Kansas.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 09:32:42

Kansas has nothing to do with it. CA is an impoverished hole.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 08:21:42

The price declines are accelerating.The anxiety levels are rising… the fear is seething… the enragement is surging. The HBB proves it.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 08:29:38

From the “All Things Reach Their Logical Conclusion” department:

‘We have reached a point in our nation’s descent into psychotic tribalist fear where people of stature and apparent sobriety unabashedly use the expression “final solution” when discussing the existence of Muslims.’

‘For ISIS “and those similarly motivated,” insists retired Marine Lt. Col. James G. Zumwalt in an essay published by Family Security Matters, “a rational world should recognize but one `final solution’ exists – their extinction.”

‘For Zumwalt. “those similarly motivated” is an expansive category, which includes not only “al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, the mullahs of Iran, Somalia’s Shababb, [and the] Khorasan group,” but also their Muslim victims. On the basis of murkily sourced atrocity accounts and propaganda videos of dubious provenance, Zumwalt concludes that the victims of ISIS exhibit a “Muslim death wish” by supposedly allowing themselves to be killed without seeking “to overpower their captors.”

“The message to take from Muslim victims unwilling to save themselves to pursue their promised afterlife should be clear: their murderers will never be convinced to stop killing,” asserts Zumwalt. An unspoken but undeniable corollary of his view is that wholesale annihilation of Muslim populations is strategically necessary and morally justifiable, because Muslim victims of terrorism are infected with the same “ideology” as their captors.’

‘Zumwalt is a prominent a mouthpiece for the Military-Industrial Complex, and it’s not surprising that his views are echoed by other members of the Pentagon-aligned Commentariat. For example, Retired Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer claims that Syrians under siege by ISIS have pleaded, “Please bomb us! We’d rather be bombed and dead, than raped by ISIS.”

“Kill them all, for God will know his own,” recommended the religious adviser to the pious Crusaders laying siege to the castle at Beziers, setting their minds at ease over the prospect of killing orthodox Catholics along with Albigensian heretics. That mandate, adapted to a literary level suitable for “reality” television, was recently renewed by Duck Dynasty patriarch (and, therefore, theological heavyweight) Phil Robertson with application to Muslims: “In this case, you either have to convert them – which I think would be next to impossible … or kill them.”

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 08:32:20

OK, I know it’s is a serious topic, but this made me laugh:

‘Duck Dynasty patriarch (and, therefore, theological heavyweight)’

Comment by AmazingRuss
2014-10-11 08:42:45

You won’t be giggling when he’s elected president.

Comment by butters
2014-10-11 08:56:08

Duck Dynasty/Palin presidency will be on worse than bush/cheney or Obama/BiPalin.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-11 08:59:20

You know Russ, this guys is just following along with what the PTB want. We need a boogie man, they think. So we’ll invent one. Mr Duck is simply taking it where it has to go.

Think of it this way; the Really Serious People (trademark) want regime change in Syria. Regime change arms what will become ISIS. ISIS puts our curiously good videos all of a sudden. Bam, we are bombing Syria.

These very same guys were beheading people in Syria and filming it over a year ago. I even saw one eat a human lung on youtube. (Funny how those videos were crude and amateur-y). Of course, back then, they were the good guys. And they couldn’t even beat the Syrian army. Now, they walk across the middle-east like giants. Or so we’re told.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 08:48:57

LOL….

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 11:06:23

It is all fun and games until you are ganged raped…

Austrian Teenagers Who Joined ISIS Now Regret the Move
National Review | October 10, 2014 | Charles C. W. Cooke

The teenage girls who abandoned their families in Austria to become jihadis for ISIS feel they’ve made a terrible mistake by joining the barbaric lifestyle and they want to come home.

Samra Kesinovic, 17, and Sabina Selimovic, 15, are believed to be married, pregnant and living in the Islamic State-controlled city of Raqqa in northern Syria, Central European News reports.

Evidently, the move didn’t work out as the pair had hoped:

The change of heart is a much different tune than the note they left behind for their parents when they fled back in April, which read: “Don’t look for us. We will serve Allah — and we will die for him.”

As I have noted before, totalitarianism is sadly attractive to the bored and the disaffected, and, as anybody who has either been a teenager or spent time around one knows, there are few people more bored and disaffected than they. At its root, this story is merely an extremely dramatic version of the age-old running-away-from-home-to-be-with-my-older-boyfriend tale. Except, that is, that the boyfriend doesn’t just have a motorcycle and an attitude, he has a rocket launcher and a death wish.

Austria has its problems. But the challenge the girls face is not so much that their fellow countrymen will judge them harshly if they return as that they have both thrown in their lots with a cabal of psychotic killers who would happily execute them in broad daylight if they so much as inquired as to how they could get out of Raqqah.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:22:57

The teenage girls who abandoned their families in Austria to become jihadis for ISIS feel they’ve made a terrible mistake by joining the barbaric lifestyle and they want to come home.

Samra Kesinovic, 17, and Sabina Selimovic, 15, are believed to be married, pregnant and living in the Islamic State-controlled city of Raqqa in northern Syria, Central European News reports.

I’ve heard of teenagers with troubled lives before, but this story pretty much takes the cake.

 
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 08:43:56

The horror! Faux News is reporting that Harvard students are saying America is the bigger threat to world peace, compared to ISIS.

so why does that network keep bringing on Ron Paul and Judge Napolitano? Those guys should scold Faux.

faux is taking jabs at libertarians. Young people tend to be libertarian these days.

Comment by scdave
2014-10-11 08:50:54

Young people tend to be libertarian these days ??

These days ?? Young people are always libertarian…

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 09:03:47

In the 70s I remember my peers were mostly socialists.

 
 
Comment by butters
2014-10-11 09:22:30

Irony on this is that the same Harvard graduates have always pushed wars on Americans. Never trust a poll or a word they say, watch the actions.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 12:22:38

So these 20 year olds were the same ones advising FDR during WWII?

 
 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2014-10-11 09:32:58

I have been noticing a lot of Chinese, Arabs, Indians, and Africans around Syracuse NY. They dress in their native clothing. Some of them carry items bought at a store in a basket on their heads like they do in third world countries. Syracuse in very cold and snowy area and there are not a lot of jobs in this area for the local population. I spoke to a veteran HR manager and she said that in her opinion no HR manager was going to hire them as these new immigrants had language barriers and no skills to offer a potential employer. In Syracuse NY about 35 percent of the population is on welfare, so who is going to support all these people who are here in large numbers. On top of this our local mayor as well as catholic charities wanted the South American children to come here despite the opposition from the local taxpayers.

Greedy selfish bastards are the local politicians and the charities/ Rant off

Is this happening in your city or town??

Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 10:53:36

Permanent Democrat Supermajority

It is really all you need to know.

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 12:25:03

Buy precious metals and keep stacking over time. That’s something you are much more likely to keep than your 401k because the Cyprus style confiscation will finance those unemployables.

Comment by SUGuy
2014-10-11 13:28:36

As there was a correlation between interest rates and the price of gold. I am planning to start stacking up gold next year after Feds rate increases. PCR claims that Feds been selling naked shorts on gold and thus driving down prices. The whole thing is such a mess and America being run by a bunch of selfish fools has gone mad. imho

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 13:53:35

“PCR claims that Feds been selling naked shorts on gold and thus driving down prices.”

Wouldn’t surprise me. Too many days start with stock market declines and end with stocks back at the opening bell and gold hammered.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 16:04:59

This is to allow the central bank to buy batches of gold the way I do: a set sum of money periodically.

I haven’t seen any article though about the Federal Reserve buying gold. Countries not aligned with the USA are buying gold.

https://www.bullionvault.com/gold-news/buying-gold-0820141

http://seekingalpha.com/article/2342445-is-this-why-central-banks-are-snapping-up-gold

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 19:57:43

Actually the Fed doesn’t have to buy gold to manipulate the price. All they have to do in order to drive down the gold price is to drop a hint that they may raise rates “sooner than expected,” as any increase in interest rates payable on dollar deposits increases the attractiveness of the numeraire (dollar) as a substitute for gold.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 12:31:37

My Phoenix area is a libertarian renter’s dream. Mark Taylor Apartments being built, and they are higher tiered than my current apartment. Some Mark Taylor apartments have attached two car garages. Then there is a tactical gun range I did not know about. I went in and looked. Very impressive. it’s a place I can take my “scary looking” firearms and glock.

No place is perfect: California has high paying jobs, but Arizona has a lot of libertarians not afraid to exercise freedom.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 12:48:05

Fed’s Tarullo: Banking scandals more than just a few bad apples
Published: Oct 11, 2014 11:56 a.m. ET
By Greg Robb
Senior economics reporter
Bloomberg /file 2013
Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo.

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch)—The plethora of banking scandals cannot be written off as just the work of a few bad actors, Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo said Saturday.

In remarks to the Institute of International Finance, Tarullo said that the average U.S. citizen reading the newspaper would be understandably upset after reading stories about bank mortgage fraud, and more recent scandals involving efforts to manipulate the Libor reference rate and allegations of manipulation of foreign exchange rates.

“The problem at this juncture is that there are so many problems,” Tarullo said. The institute is meeting on the sidelines of the annual meeting of the International Monetary Fund.

“You can’t just be telling yourself that there are a few apples. There is something about the structure of incentives and expectations within firms that needs to be addressed,” Tarullo said. “I think a lot of boards, and management, know it needs to be addressed.”

Tarullo is the Fed’s point man on bank regulation.

In other remarks, Tarullo said it was premature to declare that the problem of too-big-to-fail banks has been solved, noting that cross-border complications remain.

As the Fed puts higher liquidity and capital standards on the biggest banks, Tarullo said the central bank will be watching closely to see if any activities move into the shadow banking sector.

“That is something we are all going to need to keep a watch on and make sure risk is not building up in other places in the system.”

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 13:12:23

5:29 pm ET
Oct 7, 2014
Economy
SAT Scores and Income Inequality: How Wealthier Kids Rank Higher
By Josh Zumbrun
CONNECT

SAT originally stood for Scholastic Aptitude Test. But parsing the results by income suggests it’s also a Student Affluence Test.

On average, students in 2014 in every income bracket outscored students in a lower bracket on every section of the test, according to calculations from the National Center for Fair & Open Testing (also known as FairTest), using data provided by the College Board, which administers the test.

Students from the wealthiest families outscored those from the poorest by just shy of 400 points. Given the widespread use of the SAT in college admissions, the implications are obvious: Not only are the wealthiest families best equipped to pay for college, their kids on average are more likely to post the sort of scores that make admissions easy.

Thus the SAT is just another area in American life where economic inequality results in much more than just disparate incomes. And making matters worse, some employers continue to ask for test scores years after graduation.

The gap is not new to this year’s results and the College Board is not oblivious to the gap. Earlier this year the College Board announced plans to revise the test to help reduce the economic gaps in the test. They also announced plans to provide free online tutoring.

It’s tempting to believe the disparity in results arises because wealthy parents can easily afford SAT prep courses to help students game the test by learning its tricks. But some research suggests test prep has a fairly limited effect on scores. One study found that testing boosts math scores by 14-15 points and reading scores by 6-8 points.

Comment by 2banana
2014-10-11 14:45:55

A better correlation would be which kids have two parents and which kids go to union goon controlled schools

 
Comment by Combotechie
2014-10-11 18:08:47

“Students from the wealthiest families outscored those from the poorest by just shy of 400 points.”

If one hangs around some of the poorest for any length of time then he may gain an understanding of just why this is so.

(Think: Environment, environment, environment.)

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 19:58:53

The lifestyle factors that lead to impoverishment are also not conducive to helping your kids score well on the SAT.

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-10-11 14:50:44

Mobile homes: Many ‘hidden homeless’ Americans living in vehicles

October 10, 2014 5:30PM ET
by Dina Demetrius @DinaDemetrius & Michael Okwu @MichaelOkwu

Home is where the car is (part one) 4:21
America Tonight | October 9, 2014
Share Link Embed in Website

SANTA BARBARA, Calif. – For four years, the only life Paula Corb and her two daughters have known is the one inside their 2000 Mazda minivan – stopping once in a while for take-out, groceries and gas.

Corb and the girls Alice and Emily are among 214,000 “unsheltered” homeless people in America, meaning they sleep in places not intended for human beings to sleep, like bus stations, abandoned buildings, parks or cars. For them, making a pit stop for gas is the equivalent of paying rent.

“We go on about a four-block radius,” Corb explained. “It’s $5 to $10 a day. You see, that’s $70 a week times four. I mean, that’s more than we really have got.”

The vast majority of the country’s 71,000 homeless families live in shelters, but almost 10,000 are living life like the Corbs.

For two decades, Paula Corb, her engineer ex-husband and two daughters lived in a four-bedroom house just outside of Santa Barbara. She described their life as a “fairy tale.” But after her eight-year divorce, Corb went broke. The money from selling the house – at the bottom of the housing market – went to her debts and her lawyers. And as a homemaker for more than 20 years, she’s had trouble finding work. The family packed up their stuff and moved into the van, where they live off of food stamps, gift cards for gas and food and Alice receives a Social Security disability check.

“It was scary. It was depressing,” said Alice Corb, 22, the older daughter, of the first night living in the van. “I just kept thinking, ‘How could this have possibly happened?’ And this mantra in my head just repeated over and over: ‘I want to go home.’ And I just kept avoiding this one thought in my head that says, ‘You don’t have a home to go back to.’”

Paula Corb gets maybe four hours of sleep before she’s awake and doing the family’s laundry in a church annex. To avoid the crowds, she’s started around 3 a.m. She uses a suitcase and microwave stacked on the passenger to stretch out her legs to sleep.
Doing a 180°

Home is where the car is (part two) 4:37
America Tonight | October 9, 2014
Share Link Embed in Website

In Santa Barbara, a city famous for its coastline and its moneyed, Mediterranean ease, it’s illegal for anyone to sleep in a vehicle parked on public roads. Being among the “hidden homeless” and getting through the day can be a serious struggle.

“The first concern is space,” said Emily Corb, 18. “A lot of the time [was] how I going to sleep? Where am I going to put my things? Where am I going to put my books so they’re safe? … Another big concern is bathrooms. Will the bathroom be taken? Will they be cleaned? Will we have gas to go to that bathroom? When will it close?”

But the Corbs have been able to find a semblance of stability through a Santa Barbara initiative that’s helped the hidden homeless for more than a decade. The “Safe Parking” program works with churches, businesses and other groups willing to host a small number of homeless in their vehicles overnight.

america.aljazeera.com/…bile-homes-manyhiddenhomelessamericanslivinginvehicles.html - 118k -

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-11 20:05:35

That story is beyond sad. But let it be noted that this is one of the unheralded consequences of government policies deliberately intended to push housing prices skyward.

 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-10-11 15:08:24

One of the things in Glenn Greenwald’s book I am having trouble (nightmares?) with is the middle part of the book where it is said that the intelligence data received on other nations and companies in other nations is fed to the U.S. dept of Commerce. Presumabley in turn that info is doled out to favored big businesses to get an economic advantage over foreign competitors.

As a stock investor I find it disturbing. It is true that other nations spy on us and do industrial espionage. But this does not mean we should do the same.

It was bad enough that big social media companies are complicit in giving all our info to the government. Once again here, if anyone wants to say they have nothing to hide, please provide your passwords in a reply to this post.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-10-11 18:22:18

Federal Judge: Texas Voter ID Law Unconstitutional

“…has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans…”

by Ross Ramsey | Texas Tribune | October 11, 2014

Less than two weeks before the start of early voting, a federal judge ruled the state’s photo voter ID law unconstitutional late Thursday and ordered state officials to drop the new requirements.

“The Court holds that SB 14 creates an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose,” U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi wrote in a 147-page opinion. “The Court further holds that SB 14 constitutes an unconstitutional poll tax.”

A spokeswoman for Attorney General Greg Abbott said the state would immediately file an appeal to the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“The State of Texas will immediately appeal and will urge the Fifth Circuit to resolve this matter quickly to avoid voter confusion in the upcoming election,” Lauren Bean said in an emailed statement. “The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that voter ID laws are constitutional so we are confident the Texas law will be upheld on appeal.”

The voter ID law, enacted last year, requires most citizens (some, like the disabled, can be exempt) to show one of a handful of allowable photo identification cards before their votes can be counted. Acceptable forms of photo ID include a Texas driver’s license or state ID card that is not more than 60 days expired at the time of voting, a concealed handgun license, a U.S. passport, a military ID card or a U.S citizenship certificate with a photo.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-10-11 18:35:30

School workers say they were fired because they weren’t Hispanic
Former workers say district is favoring Hispanic job candidates and employees

School workers say they were fired because they weren’t Hispanic

by Brian Amaral | NJ.com | October 11, 2014

Two former school district employees, including the one who oversaw its affirmative action policies, filed race discrimination suits in September, saying they were fired because they’re not Hispanic.

Bernice Marshall, the former human resources manager, and Edmund Treadway, the former transportation manager, argue in Superior Court filings that the Perth Amboy School District is favoring Hispanic job candidates and employees.

“No one’s paying attention to the kids,” said Marshall, who is African-American. “It’s about who’s getting hired, who needs to be hired. They’re paying attention to controlling the jobs in the district. They could care less about curriculum and instruction.”

School board members and officials dispute that the district discriminates against non-Hispanic candidates. Derlys Gutierrez, the school district’s lawyer, said that two recent lawsuits are “without merit.”

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-11 21:15:34

crater

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-12 00:07:08

Chinese Premier says economy will avoid hard landing
SHANGHAI Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:57am BST
China’s Premier Li Keqiang (L) and German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier laugh during a signing ceremony at ”The Hamburg Summit”, a Chinese-German business conference, at the chamber of commerce in Hamburg, October 11 2014.

(Reuters) - China will avoid a hard landing despite worries over a slowdown in the world’s number two economy and a flagging real-estate market, the country’s Premier Li Keqiang said in a speech in Germany on Saturday.

The comments, reported by state news agency Xinhua, echoed earlier ones he made in London in June.

“China’s economy will not suffer a ‘hard landing’ like some people fear, but will bring a positive impact to the global economy,” Li said during a speech in the city of Hamburg.

China’s third quarter growth is likely to be its weakest growth in more than five years as a property downturn weighed on demand, according to a Reuters poll of 20 economists released on Friday.

According to the poll, the economy may have expanded 7.3 percent in the third quarter from a year earlier, the weakest reading since 6.6 percent growth in the first quarter of 2009.

Premier Li said that staying power will be more important to China’s economy than speed of growth.

“Economic development is not a sprint, but a long-distance race without end. You need a certain amount of speed, but even more important is endurance and stamina,” he said.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-12 00:08:53

The world’s biggest economies
China’s back
Oct 11th 2014 | From the print edition
Timekeeper

This week the International Monetary Fund updated its data on the world economy. For the first time it ranks China’s economy as the world’s biggest in purchasing-power-parity terms. Historians, though, point out that China is merely regaining a title that it has held for much of recorded history. In 1820 it probably produced one-third of global economic output. The brief interlude in which America overshadowed it is now over.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-12 00:13:12

ft dot com > reports >
World Economy
October 9, 2014 9:59 pm
Fears of housing crash in China raise global alarm
By Emily Cadman

Fears of a housing market crash are weighing on forecasts for global growth. But this time it is China, not the US, which is causing concern in a sign of the shift under way in the world economy.

Ask economists what factors could hamper global growth this year and the majority will reel off a list that includes a hard landing for the Chinese economy.

The alarm is caused by property, with Moody’s Investors Service warning in its latest outlook that a “steep housing downturn in China could derail the global recovery”.

Residential sales dropped 9.3 per cent year on year in the second quarter of this year, with sales registering the deepest contraction since late 2008. Data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed house prices in August fell in 68 of 70 major cities.

Moody’s estimates that, in a pessimistic but plausible scenario of a 10 per cent fall in both property transactions and prices, China’s GDP growth would be between 1.5 and 2 percentage points lower than currently forecast – falling to about 5 to 6 per cent.

Lower growth in China, it warns, would “dampen” world trade, hit confidence and “could lead to a significant negative impact on global growth”.

Laura Eaton, an economist at Fathom Consulting, says the risk of a hard landing in China has been “creeping up over the past few years”, adding: “There is not a full-blown banking crisis in China yet, but we are certainly in the foothills.”

But in the west, there is little sense that property markets present the same systemic risk to the world economy as they did before the subprime bubble burst in the US.

House prices are beginning to inch up around the world, with the International Monetary Fund global house-price index having increased for the past seven quarters in a row.

Over the past year, 33 out of the 51 countries in its index have shown rises. Adam Slater, a senior economist at Oxford Economics, a consultancy, says there are still “pockets of housing risk” and that in Australia and Canada prices look overvalued. But given substantial price drops in recent years in many key markets “the macroeconomic fallout from any further market correction should be less severe than in 2007”.

In the US, house prices have recovered since bottoming out in early 2012, but have still only recovered about half of the decline from the housing crash at a national level. Hui Shan, a US economist at Goldman Sachs, says as the wider economy and labour market recovers “we expect improvements in the housing market, although the pace is likely to be measured”.

Burnt by the contagion inflicted by the subprime crash, national regulators and international bodies are keen not to be seen as complacent.

In June, Min Zhu, deputy managing director at the IMF, warned that regulators needed to “guard against another unsustainable boom”, but that the tool kit to manage booms “is still under construction”.

One of the major factors in rising house prices around the world has been ultra-low interest rates and exceptionally loose monetary policy, which has both made borrowing money cheaper for people with mortgages and-depressed yields on other assets, leading many cash rich buyers to pile into real estate.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post